Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-23-2014 HSC AgendaPage 1 of 2 CITY OF DUBLIN HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA THURSDAY, October 23, 2014, 7:00 PM DUBLIN CIVIC CENTER, 100 CIVIC PLAZA, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 3.1 Public Comments At this time, the public is permitted to address the Human Services Commission on non-agendized items. The Commission must, however, comply with all State Laws in regard to items not appearing on the posted agenda. The Commission may respond to statements made or questions asked, or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the matter. Any member of the public may contact the Office of the Community Development Department related to the proper procedure to place an item on a future Human Services Commission agenda. The exceptions under which the Human Services Commission MAY discuss and/or take action on items not appearing on the agenda are contained in G.C. 54954.2(b)(1)(2)(3). 4. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS – July 24, 2014 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Minutes. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – None 6. PUBLIC HEARING – None 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – None 8. NEW BUSINESS 8.1 Alameda County social services provided to Dublin residents The Commission shall receive information from Josh Thurman, Deputy Chief of Staff from Alameda County Supervisor Haggerty’s Office on the social services provided to Dublin residents by Alameda County agencies. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive Report and Discuss. 8.2 Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Community Grant Program: Grant Recipient Year-End Reports The Human Services Commission will be presented with the Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Community Grant Program year-end summary reports submitted by grant recipients. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive Report. 9. OTHER BUSINESS Page 2 of 2 Brief INFORMATION ONLY reports from the Human Services Commission and / or Staff related to meetings attended at City Expense (AB 1234). 10. ADJOURNMENT – Next Meeting Thursday, January 22, 2015 This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a) If requested, pursuance to Government Code Section 54953.2, this agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, please contact the Office of the Community Development Department at (925) 833-6610 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. A complete packet of information containing Staff Reports (Agenda Statements) and attachments related to each item is available for public review at least 72 hours prior to a Human Services Commission Meeting or, in the event that it is delivered to the Commission less than 72 hours prior to a Humans Services Commission Meeting, as soon as it is so delivered. The packet is available in the Community Development Department at the Civic Center. HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION Mission The City of Dublin Human Services Commission is dedicated to outreach, education, and collaboration to address the community’s human service needs as represented in the adopted needs assessment. Vision The Human Services Commission seeks solutions to the needs identified in the adopted needs assessment. The Commission will make recommendations to the Council on priorities for efforts that are consistent with the City Council’s adopted mission, vision and values. The Commission evaluates, encourages and advocates for the provision of human services in the community by making recommendations for organizational grant funding, educating residents on human services needs and promoting available services, supporting citizen awareness, engagement and volunteerism in addressing human service needs, and by collaborating with neighboring cities on regional human services solutions. DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 1 of 10 HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DRAFT Minutes CITY OF DUBLIN July 24, 2014 The July 24, 2014 Human Services Commission (HSC) was called to order at 6:59:00 PM at the Dublin Civic Center, Dublin, California, by Chairperson (Chair) Lockhart. ROLL CALL Commissioners (Cm.) Present: Vice Chair (Vc.) Brown, Lockhart, McCormick, Muetterties, Wakamoto-Lee Commissioners Absent: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Lockhart led the Pledge of Allegiance. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 3.1 Public Comments – None 3.2 Presentation by Alameda County Sheriff’s Office Paul Hess, Emergency Services Supervisor of Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, with the Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Services presented information about how the Sheriff’s Office collaborates with local social service agencies in emergency situations. Mr. Hess mentioned that most cities have established emergency volunteer centers with an organized group of people, trained to help at the time of an incident. Chair Lockhart stated that these volunteers are referred to as disaster relief volunteers. Amy Cunningham, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that the Neighborhood Resources Unit in conjunction with Roger Bradley, Assistant to the City Manager, is coordinating that function for the City of Dublin. Chair Lockhart asked if block captains and the Neighborhood W atch Program is involved. Mr. Hess confirmed the Neighborhood Watch Program is involved. He further stated that a grant received this year is helping to establish a website for the emergency volunteer centers. He added that the website has information for the public and for the volunteer centers to provide continuing training and mentoring. Chair Lockhart asked if Collaborating Agencies Responding to Disasters (CARD) is reaching out to people where English is their second language. She explained that Dublin includes many people in this demographic and expressed concern about the lack of disaster preparedness information provided to these residents. DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 2 of 10 Mr. Hess stated that he was not sure if CARD is reaching out to other language groups, but will check on that. Vc. Brown asked what services the emergency volunteer centers provide. Mr. Hess explained that the centers collect, analyze and categorize the skill level of each volunteer and assign them to functions that best match their skill set. Cm. McCormick asked if CARD is a government agency. Mr. Hess explained that CARD is a not-for-profit organization that provides educational services to people throughout Alameda County. Cm. McCormick asked if Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster (VOAD) is similar to CARD. Mr. Hess explained that VOAD is a nationwide program comprised of various agencies that respond post disaster. VOAD volunteers have specific skills and functions. One, such group, the Mennonite Church, rebuilds homes after a disaster. He also explained another function of CARD is to train people that are economically challenged and agencies that can assist these groups. Ms. Cunningham explained that CARD spoke at the recent Faith Leaders Breakfast about disaster preparedness and provided faith leaders with information about how their congregations could prepare for disasters. Terry Langdon with the Office of Emergency Services explained that VOAD is a national program. Alameda County has had its own VOAD program for three years. She added that the Alameda County VOAD is currently identifying church and volunteer organizations that can be used post disaster. She encouraged any group to contact them to be added to the VOAD list. Vc. Brown asked how the HSC and other Commissions can help with pre/post disaster needs. Mr. Hess suggested the Commission identify the top ten human services needs that could surface in Dublin post disaster. He then recommended the Commissioners support the City through information and preparedness. He encouraged the Commissioners to think about people with special needs including single moms and the elderly who may need extra assistance post disaster. Chair Lockhart asked who determines if an organization’s facility, whether public or privately owned, can be used for feeding or shelter post disaster. DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 3 of 10 Mr. Hess explained that in emergencies the Operations group, those staff working in the field (fire, police, public works, emergency services), will advise the Logistics staff that a facility is needed. Chair Lockhart suggested that the HSC put together a plan to identify facilities that might be needed. She felt that, if possible, organizations should be consulted prior to a disaster about the use of their facilities. Ms. Cunningham explained that Roger Bradley has a data base that includes organizations and businesses the City works with in the event of an emergency. Chair Lockhart asked if the Shannon Center is the only volunteer center and voiced concern that it may be problematic getting across town in a post disaster situation. Ms. Cunningham explained that multiple sites throughout the City have been identified for use as volunteer centers and shelters, including the Office of Emergency Services, which is located by the Santa Rita Jail. Chair Lockhart asked how Camp Parks military base will be used during a disaster. Vc. Brown explained that Camp Parks practices various scenarios for preparedness, such as setting up a shelter and a morgue unit. He explained that Camp Parks responds and reports to the Department of Defense about how the facility will be used. He then mentioned that education and communication is the most important role the HSC can have. He suggested the core focus be on the Neighborhood W atch program. Ms. Langdon reminded the HSC that a shelter in place during criminal activity or during explosions is also a type of mini-disaster. She then added that neighborhood training is paramount to successfully handling the smaller disasters. These events prepare neighborhoods for larger disasters. Ms. Cunningham stated that Dublin’s police officers and fire department are contracted through Alameda County. These relationships provide for greater support in disasters. When faced with a disaster Dublin has many amenities available. Chair Lockhart stated that the HSC should establish priorities as to whether the Commission will be more effective focusing on everyday human service needs or disasters. She emphasized education as the common denominator for both. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS 4. April 24, 2014 On a motion by Cm. McCormick and seconded by Cm. Muetterties, on a vote of 4-1, the HSC approved the minutes of the April 24, 2014 meeting. Vc. Brown was absent from the meeting and abstained from voting. DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 4 of 10 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS – None PUBLIC HEARING – None UNFINISHED BUSINESS – None NEW BUSINESS 8.1 Joint Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton Human Services Commission Workshop held June 10, 2014 Ms. Cunningham opened the discussion by summarizing the joint Human Services Commission workshop as presented in the staff report. She stated that Pleasanton was unable to pick their representatives for the subcommittee due to a lack of a quorum for their last meeting. She added that they expect to choose two or three representatives at their next meeting in late August. Cm. McCormick thought the joint meeting was a valuable exercise in learning how other commissions approach the needs in their communities. She noted that some commissions take a hands-on approach by raising money, designing a community plan and identifying agencies to fund that fill their priority needs. Ms. Cunningham highlighted that the other two cities have a much larger population and are eligible for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding as entitlement cities, whereas Dublin mainly uses General Fund money in granting funds. Cm. Wakamoto Lee noted that Livermore is collaborative within the region. Ms. Cunningham stated that Livermore and Pleasanton commissions are excited that Dublin has a formal HSC as this creates opportunities for more regional collaboration. Vc. Brown suggested establishing a HSC task force to assist in the recruitment of volunteers to help with the HSC’s educational piece. He explained that task forces have been used by other commissions and may provide the hands-on approach the HSC is looking for. Cm. McCormick stated she would also like to see a more proactive approach either through a task force or through a design plan with the assistance of a consultant who can identify funding needs. Ms. Cunningham explained that grant funding centers on the City Council’s priorities. She then outlined progressive steps taken regionally and locally addressing human services needs in the Tri-Valley. Vc. Brown emphasized the importance of knowing the demographics of those in need, including: age, gender, race and economic status. He explained that this would assist in targeting services to existing and emerging needs. DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 5 of 10 Cm. McCormick asked if demographic statistics appear in Eastern Alameda County Human Services Needs Assessment (Needs Assessment). Ms. Cunningham stated that the Needs Assessment does contain some demographic data, but it may be too dated and general to use. She suggested getting more current data. Chair Lockhart elaborated that Scott Haggerty of Alameda County Board of Supervisors may have this information. She suggested having Josh Thurman, Deputy Chief of Staff, from Scott Haggerty’s Office speak to the HSC regarding the demographics of Dublin residents and their needs. Vc. Brown suggested obtaining demographics from Eden I & R. Ms. Cunningham explained that the demographics obtained from Eden I & R are provided voluntarily by the participants and may not be conclusive. Chair Lockhart suggested obtaining a broader range of demographics: age, number of children and single parent households. She stated these statistics may be obtained through The Young Men’s Christian Association, Eden Housing or the Groves at Dublin Ranch. Cm. Wakamoto-Lee stated that Axis Community Health may be able to provide statistics. She also suggested capturing English as a second language data. She noted that Eden I & R may record this statistic when translation services are used. Ms. Cunningham asked if the HSC would prefer: 1.Staff to compile data; or 2. to have service providers come in and speak; or 3. Staff can compile a list and the Commission can choose a few providers from the list to come in and speak. Chair Lockhart stated choosing from a list would be helpful. Cm. Muetterties asked if the HSC can make a request from the City Council to meet monthly. Ms. Cunningham explained the process to increase the frequency of meetings would be initiated through the strategic planning process. It would require additional funding and staff resources. Chair Lockhart stated that for the HSC to be effective, they would need to meet more often. She further explained that to educate the public it would be easier for them to remember a monthly meeting, rather than quarterly. Cm. Wakamoto-Lee added that the HSC should identify an effective way to provide communication, either through a meeting or reading materials. Chair Lockhart stated that some education can be provided through the Neighborhood Watch captains. DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 6 of 10 Cm. Muetterties asked how often block captains meet. Ms. Cunningham answered that it is up to each neighborhood to decide how often they would like or need to meet. Cm. Muetterties suggested the HSC represent at National Night Out. Chair Lockhart stated that it is up to the City Council to decide if the HSC should attend National Night Out. Ms. Cunningham clarified, as individuals the Commissioners could attend National Night Out gatherings and discuss regional priorities with community members. Chair Lockhart suggested the HSC focus on the local need of mental health. She explained this regional priority does not get addressed often. Understanding and acceptance must exist for organizations to effectively assist these people in successfully living on their own in the community. Ms. Cunningham suggested the Commissioners focus on what the majority of residents need. Vc. Brown stated that behavioral health is a recognized need and suggested bringing in organizations that can discuss the topic with the HSC. Chair Lockhart suggested seeking data to determine if Dublin residents have unmet mental health needs. Cm. Wakamoto-Lee explained that behavioral health is hard to identify and unless you see a person in a particular behavior, it may go unnoticed. Ms. Cunningham suggested having Josh Thurman speak at the next HSC meeting to identify behavioral health and other County services provided to residents in Dublin. Cm. Wakamoto-Lee stated that Dublin broke the barrier with what low income housing looks like. She would like to see Dublin do the same with mental health, by taking out the stigma and adding compassion. Chair Lockhart stated that mental health has been silently calling for help but the HSC would need City leadership support before it can be tackled. She related to her fellow Commissioners that as a Commission, their role is to advise the Council. Ms. Cunningham suggested that the HSC could identify the top needs and recommended actions for the City Council to consider through the strategic planning process. DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 7 of 10 The HSC discussed whether to focus on the top three regional issues as decided upon at the joint HSC workshop. Cm. Muetterties asked if Josh Thurman could help the HSC identify the most critical need out of the top three. Ms. Cunningham stated that Josh can pull data relating to the top three needs. She asked for consensus from the Commissioners that they want to focus on the top three regional needs and not any of the other eleven needs identified in the Needs Assessment. The HSC agreed to focus on the top three needs decided upon at the joint Human Services Commission workshop: 1. behavioral health; 2. health care (including dental care); and 3. senior services. Ms. Cunningham stated that all three cities are currently doing a lot to help meet the need for medical services through the joint funding agreement with Axis Community Health (Axis). The funding will assist with construction of the new facility. Vc. Brown asked if Axis has a behavior health unit. Ms. Cunningham stated yes. She explained counseling services are provided in addition to referrals to other agencies that might have resources to address mental health needs. Vc. Brown reiterated how the Commission can go forward with a plan: 1. get data; and 2. review the data to determine a priority; and 3. write it down. The HSC discussed how they can write it down through a work session, an identified timeline, and a work plan. Ms. Cunningham reiterated that at the next HSC meeting Josh Thurman from Scott Haggerty’s Office will be invited to speak. He could provide the County’s perspective on what the needs are as it relates to the three regional priorities and suggest ways the HSC can move forward locally. Once the information is presented the HSC can discuss the results and draft a work plan. Chair Lockhart asked if the HSC can be informed of the new strategic planning process so that more meeting opportunities for the Commission can be requested. Ms. Cunningham explained that the strategic planning process starts after the new City Council is seated. 8.2 Human Services Commissioners Term of Office and Reappointment Process DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 8 of 10 Ms. Darensburg presented the term of office for each Commissioner and explained the reappointment process. She advised that the process will begin in the latter part of October or beginning of November. Ms. Cunningham encouraged the Commissioners to outreach to residents interested in human services and encourage them to apply. She explained that the HSC appointment process will be aligned with the other commissions starting next year. OTHER BUSINESS 9.0 Brief INFORMATION ONLY reports from the Human Services Commission and / or Staff related to meetings attended at City Expense (AB 1234). Cm. Muetterties shared information about an event in Pleasanton, Kids Against Hunger. Volunteers packed food that was then shipped to Haiti. Cm. McCormick invited the Commissioners to the McCormick Rose Garden dedication ceremony at Emerald Glen Park on August 7, 2014, 5:30 PM. Ms. Darensburg stated that the City of Dublin received notification from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that the City has reached the population threshold to become an entitlement City. She explained that the City has already entered into a cooperative agreement with Alameda County for the next three-year cycle and that will remain in place. Over the next several months, the City will evaluate whether to become an entitlement City as of June 2018. Chair Lockhart asked if HUD requires a three-year agreement. Ms. Darensburg confirmed that HUD does mandate a three-year agreement. Ms. Cunningham explained that this will give the City time to study and determine if it makes sense to become an entitlement City or stay with the County. Ms. Darensburg explained that one of the big concerns is funding. Currently the City is able to use approximately 55 percent of its CDBG funding for public services. She explained that as an entitlement City, that amount would be reduced to 15 percent. Chair Lockhart asked if contract services for fire and police services are paid out of the General Fund. Ms. Cunningham confirmed that public services for fire and police services are primarily paid out of the General Fund. Ms. Darensburg clarified that in this case not-for-profit organizations/grant recipients are referred to as public services. Ms. Cunningham further explained that public services is a CDBG funding category and includes the not-for-profit programing. Ms. Darensburg explained that as an entitlement city, the City is eligible to receive more CDBG funding, however specific funding categories are capped. She explained that currently CDBG DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 9 of 10 public services are funded at $46,000 and as an entitlement city only $18,000-$20,000 could be used towards public services. Chair Lockhart stated that the City would receive additional funds in other areas. Ms. Darensburg agreed that other funds would be received; however the use of those funds is limited because of stringent requirements, such as providing curb cuts in low income areas. She further explained that HUD allocates money according to factors including population, age of housing, low income census tracts, and community income. Ms. Cunningham explained that HUD estimates the City would receive $155,000 in CDBG funding with $15,000 to $18,000 available to not-for-profit organizations for program and operational purposes. Chair Lockhart asked how the not-for-profit organizations get served by Dublin’s neighboring cities. Ms. Darensburg explained that other cities receive more CDBG funding than Dublin and are also limited in the way they can spend monies received from HUD. Ms. Cunningham reiterated neighboring cities are capped at 15 percent also; however they receive more money so the actual dollar figure they are able to allocate to public services is higher. She also stated that entitlement would require more administrative work and staff time. She explained that it is Staff’s perception that the HSC and City Council are interested in retaining the ability to give as much funding as possible directly to not-for-profit programing. Currently the City gives more than the 15 percent cap because some of the agencies in the County’s pool do not use their funding for public services. This allows the City of Dublin to access more funds for public services. Ms. Darensburg stated that Staff will ask the City Council to reactivate the Ad Hoc CDBG Subcommittee to re-evaluate the CDBG program. She stated that the grant process is starting again and post cards will be sent to the grant recipients informing them of the mandatory grant workshop. Ms. Cunningham explained that funding for the arts programs has been reviewed by the Parks and Heritage and Cultural Arts Commissions as suggested by the HSC. In August/September Staff will present recommendations to the City Council about how to allocate funding to arts in the future. Up-and-coming events: 1. Scott Haggerty’s Office, a public meeting through the public health department, August 4, 2014, 5:30-7:30 PM, Livermore Library; 2. Tri-Valley Health Fair, Carnaval de la Salud, August 23, 2014, 10 AM - 4 PM (in need of volunteers); 3. Tri-Valley Poverty Awareness Initiative, a new grassroots effort to educate the community on poverty in the region; and 4. HSC meeting, Thursday, October 23, 2014 ADJOURNMENT Being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:00:47 PM. DRAFT HSC Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2014 Page 10 of 10 Respectfully Submitted, _________________________________ Anastasia Nelson, Recording Secretary APPROVED: ______________________________ Chairperson, Janet Lockhart COPIES TO: Josh Thurman, Supervisor Haggerty’s Office ITEM NO: 8.1 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA STATEMENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION DATE: October 23, 2014 TO: Human Services Commission SUBJECT: Alameda County social services provided to Dublin residents Prepared by Amy Cunningham, Assistant to the City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Commission shall receive a report from Josh Thurman, Deputy Chief of Staff from Alameda County Supervisor Haggerty’s Office on the social services provided to Dublin residents through Alameda County agencies. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Receive Report and Discuss. DESCRIPTION: At the July 24, 2014 meeting, Commissioners expressed interest in learning more about the types of social services that Alameda County provides directly to Dublin residents. Josh Thurman, Deputy Chief of Staff from Alameda County Supervisor Haggerty’s Office, will make a presentation about the services Dublin residents receive. At the conclusion of the presentation, the Human Services Commission will engage in discussion about the information presented by Mr. Thurman. Commissioners will be asked to: • Share their thoughts about the data. • Discuss how the information relates to: o the needs identified in the 2011 Human Services Needs Assessment o the Tri-Valley Human Services Commissions’ priorities  behavioral health;  medical/dental services; and  senior services. • How this information can be used in Dublin’s human services efforts. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS / PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. COPIES TO: ITEM NO: 8.2 Page 1 of 2 AGENDA STATEMENT HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION DATE: October 23, 2014 TO: Human Services Commission SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Community Grant Program: Grant Recipient Year-End Reports Prepared by Amy Cunningham, Assistant to the City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Human Services Commission will be presented with the Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Community Grant Program year-end summary reports submitted by grant recipients. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Receive Report. DESCRIPTION: The City of Dublin Community Grant Program was created by the City Council to provide financial support to local not- for-profit organizations serving the Dublin community. The program is supported through several funding sources including the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program and the City’s General Fund and Affordable Housing Fund (as appropriate). Each year, the City Council awards funding to organizations that best meet the community’s needs in support of the City’s adopted Mission, Vision and Values (see City of Dublin website for more information: http://www.dublin.ca.gov/index.aspx?nid=72) and the needs identified in the 2011 Tri-Valley Needs Assessment (link available at: http://www.dublin.ca.gov/index.aspx?NID=1347). One of the annual funding requirements is the completion of a year-end report. The report summarizes how the City’s funding was used, what results were achieved, and if the organization met the goals outlined in the initial application proposal and funding agreement. The attached documents provide a summary of the funding awards for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 (Attachment 1) and the outcomes/impacts each agency achieved as a result of the City’s funding (Attachment 2). This information is provided to assist the HSC in making future grant funding recommendations to the City Council. Prior to the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 grant cycle, a City Council Grants Program Subcommittee provided grant funding recommendations to the City Council for consideration. That responsibility shifted to the Human Services Commission (HSC) when it was formed in 2013. All organizations submitted their reports by the deadline. Upon review by staff, the organizations were deemed to have met their funding obligations for the funding cycle. COPIES TO: ITEM NO: 8.2 Page 2 of 2 Planning and outreach for the Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Community Grant Program has already commenced. The grant application cycle will open in mid-November 2014 and the HSC will consider funding proposals at the January 22, 2015 meeting. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS / PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Grant Award Summary (by funding type) 2. Year-End Summary Reports (alphabetical) Organizations Approved for CDBG Funds Award Axis Community Health - Capital Project 15,000$ Bay Area Community Services - Valley Wellness Center 3,500$ CALICO - Child Abuse Intervention 5,000$ Open Heart Kitchen - Hot Meals Program 10,000$ Senior Support - Case Management 10,209$ Spectrum - Meals on Wheels Program 6,475$ TOTAL 50,184$ Organizations Approved for Housing In-Lieu Funds Award Community Resources for Independent Living - Housing Services 3,500$ Tri-Valley Haven - Domestic Violence Shelter 2,000$ Tri-Valley Haven - Homeless Shelter 2,500$ Tri-Valley Housing Opportunity Center - Community Stabilization Program 25,000$ TOTAL 33,000$ Organizations Approved for General Fund Award Axis Community - Access to Health Care 10,000$ Chabot -Las Positas Community College District - Tri-Valley One Stop 10,000$ Child Care Links - Early Child Education 10,000$ Dublin High School/PFSO - Safe & Sober Grad Night 4,000$ Dublin Partners in Education- Operational Grant 25,000$ Easter Seals Bay Area - Kaleidoscope 2,500$ Eden I & R - 2-1-1 Alameda County 10,000$ Hope Hospice, Inc. - Grief Support Center 10,000$ Livermore Valley Opera - Dublin Student Program 5,000$ Pacific Chamber Symphony - Music is Fun 5,000$ Tri-Valley Haven - Domestic Violence Shelter 6,000$ Tri-Valley Haven - Homeless Shelter 7,500$ Tri-Valley YMCA - Kids w Special Needs Thrive at Y Camp 5,000$ Tri-Valley YMCA - Family Engagement at Emerald Vista 10,000$ Valley Children's Museum - Mobile Museum 5,000$ Valley Christian Center - CityServe of Tri-Valley 5,000$ TOTAL 130,000$ City of Dublin Community Grants Program Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Axis Community Health Access to Care for Uninsured, Low-income Dublin Residents Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Valerie Jonas Program Title: Report 5 Chief Development Officer Telephone: Report 5 201-925-6068 E-Mail: Report 5 vjonas@axishealth.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes.  Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 This program assists low-income residents in accessing medical care through enrollment in public insurance programs. This improves health outcomes for individuals and the community as a whole. The objective of this project is to enroll low-income Dublin residents in health care plans that provide them with immediate access to medical care. Axis's enrollment service is an ongoing program in place at our clinic sites as well as public libraries. A total 329 low-income Dublin residents received enrollment assistance during the project year, which represents 109% of the project goal of 300. The number of people seeking care at our clinical sites continues to grow and we are enrolling nearly 400 people each month at our clinics. Those who come to Axis who do not have medical insurance meet on a one-on-one basis with an enrollment specialist who provides assistance in enrolling them in a health plan that is applicable to the individual's circumstances and medical needs. Because most public plans require the completion of re-enrollment documents at six- and 12-month intervals, our enrollment staff also provides assistance in maintaining enrollment. As a result of this service, low-income residents have access to medical care and are able to maintain optimal health. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 5256 5,256.00 Total Program Participants 329 329.00 Total Dublin residents 5,585.00 5,585.00 TOTAL Page 1 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 The program was efficiently carried out by our trained Enrollment Specialists. We surpassed our goal of enrolling 300 Dublin residents. A total of 329 low-income Dublin residents received enrollment assistance during the project year, which represents 109% of the project goal. Our enrollment services have improved health outcomes for hundreds of low-income Tri-Valley residents by providing them with immediate access to medical care. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 300 300.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 329 329.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 0.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 629.00 629.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 79 79.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 250 250.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 13 13.00 Seniors (62 and older) 5 5.00 Disabled 29 29.00 Female-Headed Households 376.00 376.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 111 111.00 White 146 146.00 White + HISPANIC 14 14.00 Black/African American 0 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 50 50.00 Asian 0 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 4 4.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC Page 2 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0 0.00 Asian and White 0 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Black/African American and White 0 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 4 4.00 Other/Multi Racial 0 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 329.00 329.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 hours of service Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 329 329.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 329.00 329.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 numbers served Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 329 329.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 329.00 329.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 N/A FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Page 3 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Report 5 Axis's enrollment services reach out to uninsured families to assist them in accessing medical care by enrolling in publicly-funded health insurance programs. Axis is the sole provider of medical services for low income and uninsured Dublin residents and the only provider of enrollment assistance in the Tri-Valley. This grant supported the salary costs of a 0.25 FTE enrollment specialist who assisted a total of 329 Dublin residents in enrolling in health insurance plans. All project funds were expended in support of this service during this project year. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 A total of 578 Dublin residents received enrollment services during the project year, of which 329 were enrolled in a health insurance plan with the support of the City of Dublin Community Grant. The Affordable Care Act began this year which expanded Medi-Cal and affordable health care coverage for thousands of newly eligible residents in the Tri-Valley. Axis is a Certified Enrollment Entity (CEE) for Covered CA, and the only Covered CA entity in the Tri-Valley. Our Enrollment Specialists are trained Covered CA Certified Enrollment Counselors who provide in-person enrollment assistance to residents seeking health care coverage for health plans through Covered CA. Our Enrollment Specialists are also trained to assist in Medi-Cal, HealthPAC and all other forms of public insurance enrollment. Key strategies that have contributed to the success of our enrollment efforts include outreach and education activities such as interactive presentations, one-on-one meetings, flyers, and e-newsletters to inform the community about affordable health insurance, and determine appropriate health plans and subsidy eligibility. As a result of our enrollment services, residents were able to access primary medical care. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 Axis enrolled a total of 578 Dublin residents during this project period, of which 329 (109% of the project goal) received enrollment assistance with the support of the City of Dublin Community Grant. Success was measured through the evaluation of the number of persons served. We also conduct a comprehensive quality assurance program on an ongoing basis which tracks patient outcomes. Data demonstrated clinical improvement in patient outcomes for chronically ill patients, increased mammogram rates for women over the age of forty, increased immunization rates for children and excellent outcomes for prenatal patients and their newborns. Axis's clinical data demonstrates that our patient outcomes consistently meet federal health standards. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 There were no problems or delays in this project. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 Axis coordinates enrollment services with a variety of local entities, including local human service providers, CAPE Head Start and the local libraries. We also provide enrollment information at various health fairs in the Tri- Valley and at school-based events throughout the year. In addition, we work closely with all Tri-Valley safety-net providers to ensure that information regarding the service is widely available. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 Axis received additional support for enrollment services from the federal Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). We received a grant that totaled $180,690, of which $14,275 was allocated in additional support for this service in Dublin. Page 4 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Axis Community Health Pre-Development for Capital Project Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 4 Valerie Jonas, Chief Development Officer Program Title: Report 4 Pre-Development for Capital Project Telephone: Report 4 925-201-6068 E-Mail: Report 4 vjonas@axishealth.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes.  Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 4 Axis Community Health has outgrown its medical clinic space and must increase facility capacity in order to serve increasing numbers of patients. This pre-development project enables Axis to pursue the goal of constructing a new facility that will open in FY 14/15 and service an estimated 7,000 Dublin residents. As the sole provider of quality, affordable primary care in the Tri-Valley, this project is critical to Axis having the capacity to meet the rapidly rising numbers of low-income and uninsured Dublin residents and those in surrounding communities. This project supports the services of a project/finance consultant, architectural design, fundraising consultant, and legal services which are necessary pre-development tasks leading up to the construction phase. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 0 0.00 Total Program Participants 0 0.00 Total Dublin residents 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 4 The fourth quarter of this pre-development project was very successful and all goals were met. Specifically, during this reporting period we focused on providing additional architectural plan information as needed for planning review. We continued to refine project financial projections and updated our business plan with the most Page 5 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp up-to-date information regarding state, county and federal health reform regulations. We worked with Capital Incubator to update project timelines and identify project support necessary to each phase. We worked with our fundraising consultant (Laura McCrea and Associates) and capital campaign committee to begin campaign activities. These included meeting with potential contributors and holding a donor cultivation event. The project has been both efficient and effective in that we are on-target for opening the new facility in the anticipated timeframe which will enable us to meet the rising need for affordable care. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 0 0.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 0 0.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 0 0.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) 0 0.00 Disabled 0 0.00 Female-Headed Households 0.00 0.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 0 0.00 White 0 0.00 White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Black/African American 0 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Asian 0 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC Page 6 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0 0.00 Asian and White 0 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Black/African American and White 0 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 4 number of people served (unduplicated) Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 4 Please note that the new facility will not be completed until FY 14/15; no patients will be served through this project until that time. An estimated 2,500 Dublin residents were served in FY 13/14 through existing services at existing sites. Page 7 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 4 Axis Community Health has outgrown its medical clinic space and must increase facility capacity in order to serve increasing numbers of patients. We have initiated a facility development project and received funding from the City of Dublin related to pre-development costs prior to the construction phase. The grant allowed Axis to engage the services of a project/finance consultant, business plan/financial feasibility consultant, architectural firm, and fundraising consultant. At construction completion in 2015, an estimated 2,500 Dublin residents will be served by the new facility. All grant funds were expended. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 4 Funds from this project enabled Axis Community Health to achieve several accomplishments in our pre- development project. The funding provided for a project/financial consultant and financial feasibility consultant to pursue necessary financial modeling in preparation for pursuing construction financing. Funding for consultants also enabled us to complete the architectural design and launch a capital campaign. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 4 The program has been successful in that we are on track to meet our goal of completing pre-development work and moving into the construction phase of this project. Hitting these project milestones is critical to achieving our goal of opening the much-needed new medical facility slated for 2015. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 4 There were no problems or delays encountered with the project. Nor were there any unforeseen effects on project costs. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 4 This project did not involve collaborating agencies. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 4 City of Livermore - $125,000 City of Pleasanton - $100,000 Alameda County Measure A - $200,000 Page 8 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Bay Area Community Services, Inc. Valley Wellness Center Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 4 Benjamin Blake Program Title: Report 4 Valley Wellness Center Telephone: Report 4 613-0330 E-Mail: Report 4 bblake@bayareacs.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes.  Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 4 The program has reached out to many individuals in the community, has developed relationships with community based supports, and has provided a safety net for the community for families and individuals struggling with mental illness in the community. This safety net has been a valuable asset for the community in the means of providing support and security. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 26 26.00 Total Program Participants 1 1.00 Total Dublin residents 27.00 27.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 4 The program continues to be a success in the community in a number of ways. The graduation of participants to community supports has increased and over ten individuals have graduated to a lower level of care this past year. The employment program has also been successful and five individuals successfully obtained sustainable and competitive employment with the support of our employment counselor. We have been successful in attaining our goals and have done so with a consistent staff and with reaching out to the community to use these resources as natural supports for our participants. Page 9 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application): Persons  Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 5 5.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 1 1.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 6 6.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 12.00 12.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 1 1.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) 0.00 Disabled 0.00 Female-Headed Households 1.00 1.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 1 1.00 White 0.00 White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC Page 10 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 1.00 1.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 4 individual persons attending the program Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 1 1.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 1.00 1.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 4 The program continues to benefit from the ongoing support of the agency, the community and the participants who are actively involved in the program on the whole. The largest barrier is the lack of referral sources for the program and the limited number of new referrals to the program. This is a ongoing conversation with the county to open u the width of the referral possibilities for the program. The goal is to serve the communities which are served by the behavioral health care agency and to support them to make positive changes in their lives within the scope of wellness and recovery principles. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 4 The original purpose of this grant proposal was to support staffing to provide the highest level of care for the participants at the wellness center Page 11 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 4 The original proposal was developed to support the existing staffing patterns in the program to accomplish the wellness and recovery goals and to do community outreach to support individuals in the community to access services and to act as a safety net for individuals and families in the community. We accomplished this goal and look forward to doing so for many more years. We used the entire grant amount. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 4 The program has been successful at assisting and supporting Alameda County participants in the mental health system to graduate from services and integrate into the community using natural supports in the community as well as primary health care, spiritual resources and psychiatric resources as well. We have used employment resources to accomplish this goal, housing supports and basically work in multiple domains of living to support individuals in their wellness and recovery goals. Implementation of the IPS model of employment, which is geared to supporting a work first model has been implemented and has been very successful. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 4 The main challenge to the program is the referral base to the agency and the program is through the Behavioral Health Care System of Alameda and the team at the Valley site have not fully bough into the system change at this time. They are making slow progress, yet this struggle is causing a challenge with developing the critical mass for the program to be optimally functional FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 4 The main agencies we cooperated with were any number of medi-cal providers in the area for primary health care and behavioral health care. We worked closely with the Family Education and Resource Center, the Valley Service team representing Alameda County Behavioral Health Care, and Pathways to Wellness, a private non profit agency providing psychiatric services. We also worked with a number of local churches, senior centers, community centers and other agencies that helped to further our mission of supporting them with their wellness and recovery plans and to maintain independent living in the housing situation of their choice. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 4 The main source of funding for the wellness centers is ACBHCS/ Page 12 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp CALICO Center Dublin Child Abuse Intervention Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 4 Victoria Gwiasda, Executive Director Program Title: Report 4 Dublin Child Abuse Intervention Telephone: Report 4 510-895-0702 E-Mail: Report 4 calicocenter@yahoo.com Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes.  Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 4 CALICO is the only child advocacy center that aids children abused in Alameda County and the only local nonprofit partner that works collaboratively with Dublin Police Services (DPS) and Alameda County Department of Children and Family Services to conduct forensic interviews of young victims. DPS detectives and prosecutors rely on children’s testimony obtained at CALICO to investigate and prosecute violent crimes against Dublin children, and child welfare workers and attorneys from Alameda County Counsel use that information to determine if a child is safe at home or needs to be taken into protective custody. If CALICO services did not exist, Dublin child-abuse victims would be forced to go back to telling their stories in unsuitable environments by people insufficiently trained to talk to children, evidence would be lost, and many offenders who victimize children would not be prosecuted. CALICO’s partnership increases the safety, health and well-being of Dublin children who have suffered abuse and children at risk of abuse. Based on the testimony of a child at CALICO, detectives can determine if a crime was committed and apprehend offenders. With offenders in custody, they can no longer harm the victim-child or any other child in the home or community. Consequently the security of all Dublin children is increased. In addition, CALICO’s support services are offered at a critical moment when families are most receptive to assistance. If this moment is not seized, then families may miss the opportunity to begin the path to healing. In that case, behavioral and medical health problems may surface later that require substantially more community assistance and resources long term. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? Page 13 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 1 1.00 Total Program Participants 1 1.00 Total Dublin residents 2.00 2.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 4 Results of the project goals and outcomes for FY13-14 are provided below: GOAL 1: To minimize trauma to abused children. Outcome 1a: At least 75% of children interviewed will feel positive/neutral about their experience. 78% (14 of 18) of Dublin children reported in an exit interview they were happy/neutral about the interview questions and 94% (17 out of 18) were happy/neutral about the room. Outcome 1b: At least 75% of low-income caregivers will indicate a favorable response to their child’s treatment. All 8 (100%) of the low-income caregivers reached for follow-up calls indicated a favorable response. GOAL 2: To improve coordination of child abuse case investigations across multiple agencies. Outcome 2a: At least 70% of interviews will be observed by at least 2 team members (i.e., a child welfare worker, Dublin detective and/or prosecutor). 89% (16 of 18) of the interviews were observed by at least 2 team members. Outcome 2b: At least 10% of Dublin cases will be reviewed at monthly Case Review meetings. Three Dublin cases were reviewed involving 6 Dublin children (or 40% of the children interviewed). GOAL 3: To assist children and families in accessing medical, legal and therapeutic services. Outcome 3a: Assess at least 75% of families to determine immediate safety needs and provide appropriate referrals. All 8 (100%) of the low-income caregivers received an on-site assessment. Outcome 3b: Complete a Victims Compensation Program (VCP) application (to access funds for counseling) with at least 75% of families. All 8 (100%) caregivers received assistance with VCP. Outcome 3c: Contact at least 75% of caregivers by phone post-interview to offer additional referrals and support. All 8 (100%) caregivers received follow-up support. Outcome 3d: Of caregiver’s contacted twice, at least 50% will report that their child is enrolled in counseling. Of the 15 children interviewed, 1 is in counseling, 2 are on a waiting list, and 9 were determined not to need counseling. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period? Yes (already submitted invoice/s)  Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 18 18.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 1 1.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 0 0.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 19.00 19.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): Page 14 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 1 1.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) 0.00 Disabled 0.00 Female-Headed Households 1.00 1.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 0.00 White 0.00 White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 1 1.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 1.00 1.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 4 Conduct forensic interviews with 4 Dublin children who have been sexually or physically abused Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 1 1.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 1.00 1.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 Provide support services to 3 low-income caregivers of the Dublin victims Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a Page 15 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 4 During FY13-14, CALICO also used other funding to provide on-site and follow-up support services to five Dublin caregivers whose income levels were moderate or above. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 4 The purpose of the Dublin Child Abuse Intervention project was as follows: (1) To conduct forensic interviews with a total of 10 Dublin children (including 4 funded through the City of Dublin grants program) who were sexually abused, physically hurt, severely neglected or witnessed a homicide or severe violence in their home; (2) To provide on-site and follow-up support services to approximately 8 caregivers of the Dublin children (including 3 funded through the City of Dublin grants program); and (3) To facilitate a multi-agency response to child abuse allegations that involves Dublin Police Services, child protective services, the District Attorney’s Office and other professional partners. All funds were expended. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 4 CALICO exceeded our overall goals for the project. We conducted 18 forensic interviews with 15 unduplicated Dublin children, whereas we projected interviewing 10 victims. In addition, we provided on-site and follow-up support services to 13 unduplicated caregivers (including 8 low-income caregivers) of the Dublin children interviewed, whereas we projected providing services to 8 caregivers. CALICO continues to enhance its services to be more responsive to the children, families and professionals who rely on us. In FY13-14, we made updates to the Alameda Co. Child Abuse Protocol as recommended by CALICO and discussed with our Program Advisory Committee. For example, with the guidance of experts on disabilities, CALICO tailored the Protocol to be more responsive to the needs of child and adult victims with developmental disabilities. A new section is added on scheduling related interviews including gathering information upfront about the victim’s diagnosis, communicative abilities and daily routine, whenever possible. In addition, the Protocol now allows Adult Protective Services to schedule, attend and view forensic interviews related to their clients. Another significant change for CALICO has been the launch of our prevention education services for families. Our aim is to educate parents and other adult caregivers of young children (typically pre-K through 3rd grade) about situations that put children at risk of sexual abuse and about behaviors of adults and older youth that may indicate the individual intends to sexually offend against a child. This training emphasizes that it is the responsibility of adults to protect children and that most individuals who offend against children are known and trusted by the child. With funds from Kaiser, we piloted and began to implement the training and trained 40 School Resource Officers countywide on how to co-facilitate the training. We also integrated messages from those trainings into Page 16 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp other aspects of our work. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 4 CALICO feels the program was a success. We carefully tracked demographic and outcome data using a robust Microsoft Access database. As noted in Q8 above, CALICO exceeded nearly all of the goals and outcomes on this project. The one area in which the specific outcome was not met was the percentage of children enrolled in counseling at the time caregivers were contacted for a follow up call. While the percentage enrolled in counseling is unusually low, when examining the details of each child’s case, it appears that appropriate interventions occurred in all situations. Of the 12 Dublin children whose caregivers reported they were not in counseling or on a waiting list, nine were determined by CALICO staff not to need counseling. That figure is higher than usual, but in those cases, the child was either unlikely to have been abused, s/he was solicited online (but no physical contact made) and the situation did not warrant a clinical intervention, or there was appropriate support in other ways given the nature of the allegation. In addition, one child’s caregiver was in counseling, which is often an important first step toward healing for the whole family – a caregiver needs to receive appropriate clinical support in order to offer full and appropriate support to his/her child. The three remaining children comprise one family. In that case, the family was in crisis at CALICO, dealing with domestic violence and other emergency issues. The CALICO Family Resource Specialist (FRS) followed up 5 times by phone and met with the family twice in-person to help the mother deal with urgent concerns to help stabilize the family. The case was discussed in-depth at CALICO case review, and a child welfare worker (CWW) from Alameda County Children and Family Services was providing ongoing support; referrals to Tri-Valley Haven were provided. The FRS has left a message with the CWW to get an update of the case. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 4 We did not encounter any problems or delays with the project. However, we do have two staff – one interviewer and one Family Resource Specialist (FRS) – out on family leave for four months. In the meantime, we were able to hire a temporary FRS to fill in – Mercedes Aguirre Sullivan, MSW. In addition, we expanded our interviewing team and added a sixth part-time interviewer, Holly Fleming. This addition was essential, as CALICO’s interviewing services have grown significantly in the past year. We conducted 775 interviews countywide in calendar year 2013, which is 10% higher than any year prior in our 17-year existence. CALICO’s Program Advisory Committee discussed one policy concern this reporting period that could, depending on the resolution, require more attention to ensure that CALICO and our multi-disciplinary team are able to use the CALICO DVDs fully to minimize the times child abuse victims need to testify in dependency hearings. In a recent appeal of a dependency case, the appellate court issued an order mandating that Alameda County Counsel’s Office create a transcript of a CALICO DVD that the office entered into evidence. Prior to this ruling, County Counsel had not been required to produce a transcript in these situations. Due to the time necessary and costs involved preparing transcripts, this ruling could have an impact on County Counsel’s ability to use CALICO DVDs in dependency hearings. If the DVD is not introduced, that could mean more children having to testify. However, there exists an option for judges to offer a good cause exception, in which case the Office of the County Counsel would not have to prepare the transcript; the office is requesting such a ruling when CALICO DVDs are introduced. The issue is not yet resolved. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 4 CALICO collaborated with multiple agencies on this project, as follows: Detectives from Dublin Police Services (DPS) were the primary source of referrals of Dublin children. They also observed interviews and participated in monthly case review meetings. Sgt. Rafael Alvarez is the DPS representative on CALICO’s Program Advisory Committee (PAC). Child Welfare Workers from Alameda County Children and Family Services (CFS) also referred Dublin children to Page 17 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp CALICO, observed interviews, and participated in case review. The CFS Program Manager who oversees the Emergency Response Unit (ERU) serves on PAC and an ERU Supervisor serves on Case Review. Briggitte Lowe is the on-site District Attorney Liaison from the District Attorney’s Office. She observes interviews, consults with other DAs, facilitates case review, serves on PAC, and co-facilitates trainings with CALICO’s Training Coordinator Staff from Children’s and Highland Hospital conducted forensic medical examinations of Dublin children and adolescents interviewed at CALICO, and children and families were referred to Children’s Hospital Center for Child Protection for mental health services. Representatives from both agencies participate in case review and PAC. Other agency partners include the following Alameda County Departments: Probation, Behavioral Health Care, and County Counsel. Representatives from Probation and Behavioral Health Care participate in monthly case review meetings, and all three agencies are represented on PAC. CALICO’s Family Resource Specialists also make referrals to a range of community-based organizations in the tri-valley area (e.g., Horizon’s, Tri-Valley Haven) and other organizations that serve all of Alameda County. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 4 CALICO was able to fully fund the Dublin Child Abuse Intervention Project in FY13-14, as described below. $3,750 was received from Dublin Police Services A FY13-14 contract in the amount of $71,400 for countywide services was received from Alameda County Social Services Agency, Department of Children and Family Services (Child Abuse Trust Fund); a portion of those funds (approximately 2%) were applied to services for Dublin families A two-year contract (FY13-15) in the amount of $119,000 was received from Alameda County First 5; a portion of the year 1 funds (approximately 2% of half of the contract amount) was used to support services to Dublin caregivers with children under five years of age in the household Approximately $1,500 out of the total generated through CALICO’s participation in the Oakland Running Festival and general operating donations received in FY13-14 from individual donors was used to support Dublin families The salary and benefits of a full-time Executive Director were also provided in-kind through the District Attorney’s Office. The office also assigns a full-time District Attorney Liaison to CALICO. Page 18 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Chabot-Las Positas Community College District/Tri Valley One Stop Career Center City of Dublin Employment and Training Services Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Rafael Valle, Director Program Title: Report 5 Project Dublin Telephone: Report 5 925-485-5266 E-Mail: Report 5 rvalle@clpccd.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 As previous unemployment rates indicated in previous Labor Market Information (LMI) reporting nadir in 2010 at 7%, and though subsequent improvement has occurred, at just below 6% during the first seven months of 2012 and continuing to improve during the 2013 and first two quarters of 2014, the community continues to suffer in this area as the economy struggles toward recovery. Project Dublin provides coordinated services between Las Positas College and the Tri-Valley One-Stop Career Center that combine to offer Dublin residents who are unemployed or underemployed opportunities to improve their economic situations, and does so with a depth and breadth unavailable through any other combined community resource. At the College, for an affordable cost (or, for those financially challenged, at no cost), residents can take day, evening, and weekend classes to enhance their marketability. At the One-Stop Career Center, they can connect with available job announcements, employers recruiting on-site for new employees, self-directed resources including books, DVDs, and Internet use for employment searching, career counselors and job developers with whom to consult on career-path choices, workshops teaching effective re-employment skills, and federal programs that can finance vocational certification and licensure programs aimed at adding skill sets to make residents more competitive in this challenging job market. The Project also provides regular job search workshops, resume reviews, and career counseling at the Dublin Library to make these services even more conveniently accessible to Dublin residents. In short, Project Dublin likely represents the single most comprehensive provider of services to residents currently unemployed, or in need of better employment, available to the City during these continuing economically challenging times. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 13704 13,704.00 Total Program Participants 3603 3,603.00 Total Dublin residents Page 17 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 17,307.00 17,307.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 The goals outlined in the application were met in the last year, and we expect to meet them once again in the coming year should the Project be re-approved. The Project has annually served the City of Dublin effectively for several years running. Due to the longevity and experience of the Project leadership and key staff, its efficiency has never been better, despite difficult economic conditions that make seeking and realizing re-employment for those in need highly challenging in such a competitive area market. Though Las Positas College suffered budgetary difficulties, we served a higher number of Dublin residents in the recent fiscal year than previously. The $10,000.00 contribution received from the City was applied directly to Dublin residents seeking re-training in federal programs specifically designed to enhance their employability, and to those Dublin residents already deemed employment-ready in resume reviews, counseling sessions, and weekly workshops specifically designed to teach effective work search strategies. Dublin residents were successfully tracked via a new Virtual One-Stop (VOS) tracking software system to provide even more accurate records of participation. More participants took part in the workshops and resume review/counseling sessions offered regularly at the Dublin Library than at any time in the past. Those participating in specific training programs designed to enhance individual skill sets to upgrade marketability were tracked carefully through certificate or licensure attainment and subsequent return to the workforce. Documentation/data/records to support the above have been submitted in supplemental portions of the application. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 3300 3,300.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 3603 3,603.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 13704 13,704.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 20,607.00 20,607.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): n/a 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) 0.00 Disabled 0.00 Female-Headed Households 0.00 0.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] Page 18 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp n/a 0.00 White 0.00 White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: Page 19 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 n/a FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 5 The original purpose of the grant was to provide workforce development activities to Dublin citizens categorically classified as job seekers, laid off workers/displaced workers, youth, new entrants to the workforce, veterans, persons with disabilities, ex-offenders and services for employers. We spent the entire grant. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 The project has been a success for several years and the present year is not the exception. As previously mentioned, the $10,000.00 contribution from the City was applied directly to Dublin residents seeking re-training in federal programs specifically designed to enhance their employability, and to those Dublin residents already deemed employment-ready in resume reviews, counseling sessions, and weekly workshops specifically designed to teach effective work search strategies. Furthermore, there was an increase of participants taken part in the workshops and resume review/counseling sessions offered regularly at the Dublin Library than at any time in the past. In regards to the needs of the community, as previously mentioned the community continues to suffer in as the economy struggles toward recovery. Project Dublin provided coordinated services offering Dublin residents who were unemployed or underemployed opportunities to improve their economic situations. In regards to attempting creative methods, our agency has coordinated workshops at the Federal Correction Institution in Dublin and continues to provide resume and interviewing skills workshops as well as participating in mock job fairs. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 Project Dublin was an absolute success. Our original target was to served 3300 unduplicated Dublin citizens, we exceeded our target objective by 9.1%. How do we measure the program? We utilize our Virtual One Stop (VOS) System to track the number of services and participants in workshops, training activities, employment, etc. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 Fortunately, we encounter no problems or delays in our project. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 We work with many different partners, some of the most significant partners are: Employment Development Department, nature of collaboration is for verification purposes when clients find Page 20 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp employment. Department of Rehabilitation, nature of collaboration is to serve the disabled population. City of Livermore, nature of collaboration was to coordinate employment events. City of Dublin, nature of collaboration was to coordinate employment events and participated in TV30 as guest speaker. Many Employers: Coordinated job fairs and hiring events. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 Our main funding source comes from the Workforce Investment Board in the county of Alameda. This is how we are able to pay for citizens in need of training/re-training. Page 21 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Child Care Links Early Childhood Education Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Donnamarie Fuller, Project Specialist Program Title: Report 5 Early Childhood Education Telephone: Report 5 (925) 249-3923 E-Mail: Report 5 dfuller@childcarelinks.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 Parents were invited to attend training on various child development training topics including communication, brain development, challenging behavior and behavioral expectations. Developing parenting skills and increasing effective communication between parents and children fostered positive relationships and healthier families. Family home child care and center based providers received free professional development and training opportunities that allowed them to create and maintain quality early childhood programs. Offering free trainings and resources eased the economic burden of paying for professional growth development at institutions of higher education. The Annual Rate Survey provided Dublin residents with information about the supply, demand and average program fees for child care services. The survey provided parents with information about the availability of child care and average child care program fees in their surrounding neighborhood. The survey also helped child care providers determine gaps in service and average child care program fees in their surrounding neighborhoods. Let’s Move, “Move It”, provided opportunities for residents to participate in group and individual games and exercises that highlighted the importance of good nutrition in building a healthy lifestyle. Activities were designed to encourage an hour of physical activity every day. Residents were provided with an opportunity to ensure their child restraint (car seat) was properly installed and that their child fit into the restraint appropriately. Parents were unclear about when to switch a young child from rear to forward facing and how long school-age children need to remain in a booster seat. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children ages 1-12 years. Clearing up misunderstandings about the installation and proper use of child restraints increased the health and well-being of Dublin’s youngest residents. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? Page 22 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 578 578.00 Total Program Participants 235 235.00 Total Dublin residents 813.00 813.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 The Early Childhood Education Grant goals were successfully and efficiently completed. Dublin residents received: • training and technical assistance on a variety of child development related topics including EMSA health and safety training, emergency preparedness, internet safety, techniques and tools for dealing with challenging behaviors, communication skills, business practices, curriculum, professional development, housing and zoning laws, managing legal risks, circle time activities, managing transition, brain development and the CLASS (CLASSroom Assessment Scoring System) tool. • car seat check appointments with a trained technician • facilitated movement and exercise activities • information about choosing quality child care • an opportunity to meet with staff from local child care programs and learn about different types of programs available in the Tri-Valley • an opportunity to market their child care program at the 2014 Preschool Fair • information about local child care supply, demand and average child care costs See the response to Question #22 for more information about these services. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 200 200.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 235 235.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 578 578.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 1,013.00 1,013.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) 0 0.00 Disabled 0 0.00 Female-Headed Households 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Page 23 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 0 0.00 White 0 0.00 White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Black/African American 0 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Asian 0 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Asian and White 0 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Black/African American and White 0 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Page 24 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 Child Care Links served a total of 235 unduplicated Dublin residents through technical assistance, professional development, training opportunities, car seat checks, Let's Move "Move it" activities and the 14th Annual Tri- Valley Preschool Fair. The City of Dublin also received the Annual Child Care Rate Survey. The survey documented child care supply, demand and average program fees in the City of Dublin. Child Care Links served an estimated 470+ duplicated Dublin residents through other agency-wide funded programs such as subsidized child care programs, child care referrals, Community Care Licensing Orientations and local community events. The Early Childhood Education Grant served a total of 578 program participants from Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton and Sunol. Child Care Links is very appreciative of the 2013-2014 grant monies that helped make this project a success. Thank you. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 5 All Dublin grant funds were expended during this reporting period to provide these originally proposed services: • Provide trainings and technical assistance to family child care providers, center based staff and parents of the Tri-Valley community. Topics included child development, business practices, health and safety and serving children with special needs. • Implement car seat safety checks, allowing the community to have their child’s car seat inspected by a trained technician • Implement “Move It” curriculum including facilitated exercise. Staff will visit children and providers at their child care sites to educate on the importance of health, nutrition and how to effectively foster environments to support healthy choices for children. • Produce the 14th annual Tri-Valley Preschool Fair in spring 2014. This event presented an opportunity for parents to visit and meet with a variety of Preschool programs in the Tri-Valley in one central location. The variety of programs available helped parents choose the best program for their child. • Produce an Annual Child Care Rate Survey for the City of Dublin, and document any changes in child care supply and demand; this will aid the city in planning for the community’s child care needs. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 A total of 24 trainings were implemented between July 2013 and June 2014. Child Care Links surveyed parents, family home child care and center based providers throughout the program year to receive feedback regarding un-met training needs in the Tri-Valley Area. Topics included effective communication, nutrition, business practices, behavior expectation and management and communication. Twenty three Dublin families participated in car seat checks. According to the Alameda County Public Health Department, over 95% of all car seats are installed improperly. These car seat checks increased the health and safety of Dublin’s most vulnerable citizens. Eight Let's Move "Move It" activities were offered on-site at Child Care Links and at child care programs as requested. Parents, children and child care providers participated in these activities. 53 Dublin residents learned about the importance of daily water intake, sun safety, choosing quality foods and portion control. They also participated in group and individual games and exercises designed to encourage an hour of physical activity every day. The Tri-Valley Preschool Fair took place in February 2014 at the Dublin Senior Center. Parents met with a variety of Preschool programs in the Tri-Valley, in one central location, and learned about the different options available. Child care programs who participated in the Preschool Fair had the opportunity to speak with many families, learn more about what families are looking for in care and other child care services being offered in the Tri-Valley area. To be competitive, providers need to be aware of the rates being charged in their service area, however, state and federal laws limited child care providers from discussing their rates (price fixing). The Annual Rate Survey Page 25 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp informed providers of average program costs without potentially violating price fixing laws. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 The 2013-2014 Early Childhood Education grant was a success. Examples include: • Child Care Links exceeded its participant goals for the program year • Child Care Links exceeded the number of unduplicated residents who attended training in 2012-2013 • Early Childhood Education Grant activities aligned with the City of Dublin’s mission to “support a high quality of life which ensures a safe and secure environment that fosters new opportunities for children” • Dublin residents reported limited opportunities to schedule car seat checks with AAA or the local CHP offices due to congested schedules and staffing shortages. Residents would have had to travel outside of the area if Child Care Links did not provide car seat checks. • Child Care providers networking at the 2014 Preschool Fair arranged to refer families to each other’s program. Short and simple networking opportunities like these can be quite impactful to the long term success of small business in the City of Dublin. • Identifying and maintaining quality child care programs helps Dublin residents maintain employment. When residents maintain stable employment, due to reliable and quality child care, they are able to financially contribute to the City of Dublin’s economy. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 Child Care Links staff did not experience any problems or delays this fiscal year. Surveying parents and child care providers throughout the year allowed staff to plan a program that would address the un-met needs and interests of City of Dublin residents in the 2014-2015 program year. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 Collaborations included the following agencies and programs: Child Care Initiative Project City of Pleasanton First 5 of Alameda County Valley Family Child Care Association CAPE Headstart Examples of collaboration included training facilitation, event coordination, cost sharing and clerical assistance. These collaborations allowed the agency to continue to offer the highest level technical assistance, trainings and events to Dublin residents. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 Child Care Links collaborated with several agencies and programs which ensured the Early Childhood Education Grant would continue to offer the highest level technical assistance, trainings and events to Dublin residents. These collaborations helped maintain the quality and consistency of the services offered to the community despite the decrease in funding. Page 26 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp CityServe of the TriValley CityServe of the Tri-Valley Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Gloria Gregory Program Title: Report 5 Executive Director Telephone: Report 5 (925) 452-8276 E-Mail: Report 5 gloria@cityservetrivalley.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 Before CityServe of the Tri-Valley came into existence, there was no agency that we are aware of that was bringing together representatives from churches, schools and government entities on a regular basis. We have filled a much needed niche. Our bi-monthly community meetings, where we invite the representatives of the various non-profits in the Tri-Valley area to interact and info share, have fostered many new relationships among the schools, churches and government entities, resulting in many beneficial partnerships and shared strategies that directly benefit the city of Dublin. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 16749 16,749.00 Total Program Participants 5583 5,583.00 Total Dublin residents 22,332.00 22,332.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 Through CityServe of the Tri-Valley's monthly newsletter and website, which broadcasts the opportunities to serve at non-profits along with resources to meet the needs of the community, we have seen many volunteer needs met and non-profit agencies energized. In compiling our volunteer hours from July 2013 thru June 2014, we have had 11,995 hours reported in Dublin alone to Dublin Pride Day and Food Drive, Easter Seals Kaleidoscope, JobLink, Santa Rita Jail, Hope Hospice, Open Heart Kitchen, Ministry of Care (Grief), Valley High, Page 27 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Fredericksen Elementary, Dublin Senior Center, Senior Support Services, Childrens Emergency Food Bank, Hilltoppers Supper Club Senior Outreach, St. Raymond's Community Fish Fry, Dublin Thanksgiving Dinner, City Blast summer outreach, Camp Parks and individual/family needs. We must be successful because we are getting requests from many agencies as well as the Dublin School District for client services such as a family whose house burned down and needed kitchen goods, linens, towels, clothing and bus tickets. We were able to take them to the YMCA where they got most of the items they needed from a program where Bed, Bath & Beyond sends their unsaleable items. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): n/a 0.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 120 120.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 0 0.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 120.00 120.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): x 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) x 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) x 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) x 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) x 0.00 Disabled x 0.00 Female-Headed Households 0.00 0.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] x 0.00 White x 0.00 White + HISPANIC x 0.00 Black/African American x 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White Page 28 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: x 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. x 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. x 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: x 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. xx 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. x 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: x 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. x 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. x 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 Per Lynette Darensburg, we are not required to answer Questions 12-20 FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Page 29 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Report 5 City of Dublin grant funds were used to pay for the office space leased at $500.00 monthly, $6000 annually. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 CityServe has provided support to Valley High Continuation School staff through tutoring, gardening mentoring, & bi-monthly breakfasts; Easter Seals Kaleidoscope through monthly cleaning service not covered in their budget; Camp Parks through Welcome bags for newly arriving military families, connecting chaplain Noble to the Dublin Pride committee, and providing desserts at the Christmas dinner; community awareness of faith based programs such as Divorce Care, Grief Ministry, JobLink, budgeting/financial training, and respite care for the special needs community. We compiled a comprehensive list of all food pantries, the only list that includes both church and non- profit resources. We teamed with Dublin Rotary to provide assistance to needy Dublin families at Christmas as identified by Dublin School District staff and responded to individual family needs, such as bus tickets, mattresses, household goods and transportation. We expanded the scope of the monthly CityServe newsletter and launched the CityServe Youth newsletter. We futher expanded the CityServe website to be a more comprehensive list of resources, focused specifically on the Tri-Valley. Our CityServe community meetings are a place where representatives from non-profits, churches, government agencies, and school districts come together to collaborate and learn about solutions to human service needs. Meetings also build alliances and provide a forum for the sharing of common needs leading to solutions. Under CityServe leadership, nine Tri-Valley churches plus the chaplains from Camp Parks provided an affordable 4 day camp experience (City Blast) for 194 children ages 6-12 at Emerald Glen Park. And CityServe presented the 1st Annual Tri-Valley Prayer Breakfast hosted by Mayor Tim Sbranti held at Holiday Inn in Dublin. The breakfast, sold out with 200+ attending, provided lists from the non-profit agencies of their Holiday needs. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 We at CityServe do believe that our efforts have been successful. One way we measure success is by the comments from the non-profits we serve. They include "This is what we've been praying for"! Kelly Dulka of the Tri-Valley YMCA and Marlene Peterson of Senior Support of the Tri-Valley. "CityServe is the best I've ever seen. I've served at non-profits around the world and I've seen efforts to facilitate non-profit collaboration which most often deteriorated into bickering. These meetings are positive, helpful and inspirational." Kim Mascaro of Easter Seals/Kaleidoscope. We were also selected to receive special Board recognition from the Dublin Unified School District as part of the annual District Employee/Volunteer Recognition Program in April 2014. And as a result of CityServe’s work, our Executive Director, Gloria Gregory, was a recipient of the YMCA’s Martin Luther King Legacy Award. We also introduced the Kinship Support Services of Lincoln Child Center to the Tri-Valley non-profits.This agency provides provides grandparents or other relatives raising children not their own with services such as parenting skills, financial resources, senior services, legal assistance and mental health resources plus emergency food, clothing and shelter. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 There were no delays or problems. Our primary challenge has been to keep up with the opportunities we see to enhance communication among the stakeholders focused on human service needs in the tri-valley. and to address the individual/family needs we see referred to us, e.g. homelessness, employment, financial counseling, etc. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 We have collaborated with the following Dublin agencies: Easter Seals Kaleidoscope Hope Hospice Open Heart Kitchen Tri-Valley YMCA JobLink Page 30 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Camp Parks Childrens Emergency Food Bank Dublin Pride/Food Drive Dublin Senior Center Senior Support Services of the Tri-Valley Dublin School District - Valley High and Fredericksen Elementary Dublin Rotary Kinship Support Services Santa Rita Jail We have also collaborated with other agencies in the Tri-Valley as follows: Livermore Unified School District, Pleasanton Unified School District, Axis Community Health, Tri-Valley Haven, Shepherd’s Gate and Valley Pregnancy Center. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 Sixteen member churches contributed $13,035 to CityServe. Page 31 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Community Resources for Independent Living Housing & Independent Living Support Services for People with Disabilities ✔ Report 1 submitted: 9/2/2014 1. Name and Title of Person Completing Report: P Michael Galvan 2. Program Title: Program Director 3. Telephone: 510-881-5743 4. E-Mail: Michael.Galvan@crilhayward.org 5. Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21-26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. 1 total to date Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. 6. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need & improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Dublin Grant funds were used to help support the costs of providing the Tri-Valley branch office's Housing & IL Program services and training administered by CRIL's Tri-Valley Service Coordinator. Funds primarily covered 15% of the salary and benefits of the Service Coordinator, with a small amount for shared indirect costs associated with necessary program and office operations (e.g., telephone, supplies, insurance, etc.). Thus the Dublin Community Grant funds now more than ever support maintaining CRIL's local presence in the Tri-Valley. CRIL is the only Tri-Valley full-service provider for persons with disabilities. This past year CRIL added two new services: Travel Training and the Community Leadership Academy. 7. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 18 Total Program Participants 18 total to date 18 Total Dublin residents 18 total to date 36.00 TOTAL 36.00 TOTAL 8. Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Yes, CRIL exceeded our targeted goal for the 2013-2014 by 200% (18 as opposed to 6 consumers served). We continue to be a full-service disability office. Our mission is to provide advocacy and resources for people with disabilities to improve lives and make communities fully accessible. This FY 2013-14, CRIL added two new programs: Travel Training and the Community Leadership Academy and began to once again provide services for WIPA. Each consumer who seeks CRIL services works with a service coordinator to develop an Independent Living Plan (ILP) with goals and activities to achieve their overall objective. Dublin consumers with disabilities set 20 goals last year and met 2 (10%) of them. Please note that 40% of CRIL's new consumers set housing goals. These housing goals are longer term, such as locating affordable, accessible housing, achieving economic self-sufficiency or acquiring disability benefits. Longer-term goals often take more than one year to complete 9. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period? Yes (already submitted invoice/s) 1 total to date Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: 10. Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application): Persons 1 total to date Households 11. Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 6 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 6 total to date 18 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 18 total to date 0 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 0 total to date 24.00 TOTAL 24.00 TOTAL 12. Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): N/A Low Income (50% to 80% Median) Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) Seniors (62 and older) Disabled Female-Headed Households 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 13. List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers "Hispanic" as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] n/a White White + HISPANIC Black/African American Black/African American + HISPANIC Asian Asian + HISPANIC American Indian/Alaskan Native American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC Asian and White Asian and White + HISPANIC Black/African American and White Black/African American and White + HISPANIC American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC Other/Multi Racial Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 14. Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. N/A 15. Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 16. If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter “N/A”): n/a 17. Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 18. If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter “N/A”): N/A 19. Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 20. Please include any additional comments or clarifications here N/A 21. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. CRIL’s funding request was to provide Independent Living (IL) and Housing Services to low- and very low-income Pleasanton residents with disabilities and seniors with functional limitations. CRIL's Housing & IL Program promotes and supports a high quality of life and ensures a safe, diverse and economically balanced community within the City by providing support services and direct intervention to help low income people with disabilities who are at risk of losing their housing maintain it, and those who need to secure affordable housing obtain it. Since the City values a strong, open and responsive government that addresses the needs of all residents and businesses, CRIL's Housing & IL Program supports meeting this goal by the City investing in a community service that reaches out to its most vulnerable and growing population of older seniors with disabling conditions as well as very low income residents of all ages with disabilities. Lastly, the City strives to ensure aesthetic downtown appeal, environmental sustainability and provide public access. CRIL encourages new low-income senior, disability or multi-family housing that is developed in Dublin, and CRIL supports Dublin's lower income residents in understanding themselves as a welcomed and valued part of the community. Additionally, an integrated, multifaceted and ethnically diverse population allows for a more vibrant, dynamic and innovative city, one which values creating a quality life for each resident and neighborhood. 22. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. In January of 2014, CRIL hired a new full-time Independent Living/Travel Training Coordinator for the Tri-Valley Office. CRIL now has 1.7FTE at the Tri-Valley Office. This past year, CRIL added a new Travel Training Program, as well as, a Community Leadership Academy which encourages and supports leadership development among our consumers. The additional staff and new programs have added to CRIL's effectiveness in the Tri-Valley. 18 Dublin residents with disabilities were provided direct housing assistance or independent living services during the 2013-14 year. Independent Living Services included: Benefits counseling, Advocacy, Assistive Technology services and AT device loans, IL Skills training, Peer counseling, Personal Assistance Services, Employment services, ADA assistance, and Information & Referra, Travel Teaining and Leadership Development. Seven (4) or 39% of the 18 Dublin consumers who were provided with 1:1 assistance chose Housing as their primary or secondary goal. Finding affordable and, often accessible, housing frequently takes more than one year. CRIL continues to work with these 7 housing consumers to meet their long-range goal of moving into permanent, low-cost housing. CRIL service coordinators continue to work with the consumers who have ongoing goals that have yet to be met. CRIL also transported 50 consumers, some of whom live in Dublin, to the 2014 Disability Capitol Action Day in Sacramento. This annual event attracts 2,000 people with disabilities from all over California, and offers both a celebratory disability pride experience as well as an opportunity to meet with state legislators to discuss issues of importance to members of the disability community. 23. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh CRIL exceeded our goal of 6 unduplicated Dublin consumers by 12. CRIL has noticed an increase in the number of consumers county-wide who have multiple service needs and require additional assistance in meeting their goals. Those requesting multiple or long-range services have increased; therefore, our duplicated consumer numbers are also up. CRIL’s consumers are empowered to self-assess their success in meeting their individual goals through creating an Independent Living Plan. 100% of Dublin consumers created an ILP and a set goals in such areas as Self-Advocacy, Housing, Vocational, Healthcare access and Assistive Technology. Two met their long-term Housing goal - a tremendous accomplishment especially since long-term housing goals often take two or more years to meet due to the lack of enough affordable, accessible housing for extremely low-income residents. CRIL’s Service Coordinators will continue to work with these consumers during the 2014-15 year in assisting them with meeting their independent living goals. 24. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea In January of 2014, CRIL hired a new full-time Independent Living/Travel Training Coordinator for the Tri-Valley Office. CRIL now has 1.7FTE at the Tri-Valley Office. This past year, CRIL added a new Travel Training Program, as well as, a Community Leadership Academy which encourages and supports leadership development among our consumers. The additional staff and new programs have added to CRIL's effectiveness in the Tri-Valley. The difficulty in finding affordable and accessible housing in the Tri-Valley (and the entire Bay Area) poses a tremendous challenge to persons with disabilities and seniors with functional limitations. An increase in funding will help CRIL in assisting our consumers who seek to lead full and independent lives. 25. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. CRIL collaborates with a number of agencies in the Tri-Valley. We are located in a multi-service center which helps provide comprehensive & rapid service delivery. • ABODE (refer consumers back and forth) • Alameda County Housing Authority (collaborate to find low-cost housing) • Alameda County Public Authority (collaborate to match consumers with caregivers) • Alameda County Public Health (collaborate to find medical services) • Alameda County Social Services (collaborate to find benefits) • Alliance Healthcare (affordable health insurance our consumers) • AXIS Healthcare Center (collaborate to find medical services for consumers) • Carmen Avenue Apartments (collaborate to find low-cost housing for consumers) • Department of Rehabilitation (refer consumers back and forth) • Dublin Senior Center (collaborate to provide services) • ECHO (collaborate to find low-cost housing for consumers) • Eden I & R (to fight housing discrimination against people with disabilities) • FERC (collaborated to assist parents of psychotic children) • Homeless Prevention Program (low-cost housing for consumers) • Kaiser Permanente – Diablo Valley (medical services for consumers and support for Healthy Living Workshops) • Legal Assistance for Seniors (legal advice for our consumers) • Dublin Chamber of Commerce (outreach to businesses) • Network of Health (medical services for consumers) • NAMI Tri-Valley (psychological counseling) • PEERS (mental health support groups) • Planned Parenthood (collaborate to find medical services) • Pleasanton Paratransit (para-transit services for consumers) • Satellite Affordable Housing Associates (low-cost housing for consumers) • St. Vincent de Paul (food & rental assistance) • STAND (domestic violence counseling) • United Way of the Bay Area (seasonal tax services) • WHEELS (para-transit services for consumers) 26. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Kaiser-$1,334.68 City of Pleasanton- $11,928.60 City of Pleasanton Community Grant- $3,312.19 City of Livermore- $7,725 Dept. of Education-ARRA-$836.08 Dept. of Rehabilitation-$1,349.29 Western Digital-$2236.24 Lead-$1,020.38 CIL-WIPA-19,937.68 CIL-GAP-22,290.95 Dublin High School Parent Faculty Student Organization Dublin High Safe and Sober Grad Night Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Michelle McDonald, former PFSO President Program Title: Report 5 DHS Safe and Sober Grad Night Telephone: Report 5 925-918-2250 E-Mail: Report 5 macsmith413@yahoo.com Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 As we have done every year for more than 20 years, the parents of Dublin High seniors organized and executed the annual Grad Night celebration at Club Sport in Pleasanton, securing a safe and sober graduation night for the DHS graduating class. The event was not only fun for students, but an exercise in safety for the entire community, keeping our kids in a supervised, safe place where they could celebrate. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 350 350.00 Total Program Participants 350 350.00 Total Dublin residents 700.00 700.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 The event was a success. Nearly 100 percent of the students who registered participated and had a fun, safe evening. The goals were indeed met as students were ushered in and ushered out in an organized, supervised fashion with support from parent chaperones and Alameda County Sheriffs. Another successful year for the Grad Night program. Page 36 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 350 350.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 0.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 0.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 350.00 350.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): n/a 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) n/a 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) n/a 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) n/a 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) n/a 0.00 Disabled n/a 0.00 Female-Headed Households 0.00 0.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] n/a 0.00 White 0.00 White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC Page 37 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 Number of tickets purchased by students to reserve their place. Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 350 350.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 350.00 350.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 350 350.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 350.00 350.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 350 350.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 350.00 350.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 n/a FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 5 The entire grant was expended in the service of planning and executing the Grad Night celebration. The funds were used for expenses such as decorations, rental activities and facility expenses at Club Sport. Page 38 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 The annual program provided our high school students a safe, supervised celebration, thus making our community a safer place. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 The event was a significant success, as always. Success is measured by the safety of our students. It met the goals of the original application, as it always does. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 n/a FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 Alameda County Sherriffs - additional security Dublin High School adminstration - planning FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 Parent donations Sale of fundraising items Student ticket admission fees Page 39 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Dublin Partnerships in Education Dublin Partnerships in Education Report 1 (submitted 8/27/2014) 1. Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Susan Campbell Executive Director 2. Program Title: Dublin Partnerships in Education 3. Telephone: 925-828-2551 EXT. 5435 4. E-Mail: Susan@dpie.org 5. Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21-26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. 1 total to date Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. 6. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need & improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Dublin Partnerships in Education was able to operate and staff 3 part-time employees Monday through Friday to provide personnel to develop and complete programs for students throughout the school district and to represent the education foundation with the business community in Dublin and the Tri-Valley region. We provide programs that the schools and the District are unable to fund. 7. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 8000 Total Program Participants 8,000 total to date 8000 Total Dublin residents 8,000 total to date 16,000.00 TOTAL 8. Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. These operational grant funds were used to keep our office open each day from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 pm, Monday through Friday, year-around. The grant helps maintain three (3) regular, part-time employees who fund raise, create and administer programs for students throughout the school district, create partnerships between the business and educational community, and represent the education foundation with the business community in Dublin and the Tri- Valley region. It is also used to help keep our office equipment and supplies in working order. Also, since beginning our Enrichment Academy in 2011, DPIE pays monthly rent and utilities for our office space so as to solidify our status as an independent, private organization. Efficiently operating a private Enrichment Academy also requires specialized computer programs, which are very expensive. Running our office independently requires the support of our community to remain operational. Although our Academy grew by 50% in 2013, because we had not received our WASC-accreditation status prior to last summer's Academy, our enrollment was lower than anticipated. Since then, we have obtained our status as an accredited Academy. This year, DPIE created a part-time position of Enrichment Academy Superintendent to focus solely on the planning and administration of our newly WASC- accredited program so that it can grow and earn funds at a much quicker pace. 9. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period? Yes (already submitted invoice/s) 1 total to date Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: 10. Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application): Persons 1 total to date Households 11. Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 7100 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 7,100 total to date 8000 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 8,000 total to date 0 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 0 total to date 15,100.00 TOTAL 12. Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0 total to date 0 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0 total to date 0 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0 total to date 0 Seniors (62 and older) 0 total to date 0 Disabled 0 total to date 0 Female-Headed Households 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 13. List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers "Hispanic" as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 0 White 0 total to date 0 White + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Black/African American 0 total to date 0 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Asian 0 total to date 0 Asian + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 total to date 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 total to date 0 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0 total to date 0 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Asian and White 0 total to date 0 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Black/African American and White 0 total to date 0 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0 total to date 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Other/Multi Racial 0 total to date 0 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 14. Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. n/a 15. Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 16. If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter “N/A”): N/a 17. Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 18. If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter “N/A”): n/a 19. Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 20. Please include any additional comments or clarifications here N/A 21. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. The Grant has aided DPIE in retaining an office, supplies, rent and a staff for 3 part-time employees for delivering programs and services to the students of Dublin Unified School District. Our Four Core Services provided are: Career Exploration Arts for the Classrooms Resources for the Educators Educational Support and Enrichment DPIE maintained working hours of 9am to 1pm daily Monday through Friday 22. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Prepared our Membership drive that is in effect from August through June. Distributed our New Teacher Grants of $100 each for over $7000 Provided Donations and materials for Teachers Facilitated Volunteers for Celebrity Waiter, Challenge Day at Valley High, volunteers for Mock Interviews. We put together the information for the new Summer Bowling passes for students in our district at Earl Anthony's Dublin Bowl to keep the children busy during the summer with healthy activities. DPIE has another successful DPIE Summer Enrichment Academy with an increase in enrollment. A few of our classes included Honors Chemistry, Geometry, Biology, Algebra and Physical Education. Our Middle School Leadership class culminated with a day at the Dublin City Council Chambers where the students had the opportunity to take part in a Mock City Council meeting. Facilitated Career Exploration by obtaining speakers for both the Wells and Fallon Middle School career days. Also worked as a Speaker Bureau for all schools when the teachers were in need of an expert speaker for their classrooms. Facilitated the Inside Dublin Event at Valley High School where City of Dublin Managers shared with students their pathway to success. Participated in the Grand Opening of the new Dublin High Arts Center Supported the Dublin Chamber of Commerce at their Golf Tournament and by being an Ambassador to the Chamber for new businesses opening in Dublin and the Tri-Valley. Provided two teachers at each elementary school the opportunity to take classes for the Common-Core Arts Integration and earn their Certifications. Provided much needed after school art programs at the Middle Schools. Provided Art Supply Donations Provided funding and support for Challenge Day at Valley High School. 23. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Our annual goals are based on our Four Pillars of Service. 1. Career Exploration for Students - Signature program is Professional Pathways which includes Career Days at Middle and High schools, as well as Health and Trade Classes along with Inside Dublin at Valley High. 2. Arts Education: Signature Program - After school Art program at the Middle Schools, Guest Artist classroom visits, Art Supply Donations, and Common- Core Arts Integration Certification for Two Teachers at each elementary school. 3. Resources for Educators: Signature Program- New Teacher Welcome Grants, as well as local business in-kind donations and subject expert speakers for classrooms 4. Educational Support: Signature Program - STEM-based, WASC-accredited Summer Enrichment Academy, which provides for -credit enrichment and advanced math and science classes for high school students, as well as enrichment classes for middle school students. We also collect and disburse school supplies for low income families. Our strategies for tracking program success are evaluation of money spent, surveys and progress counted through the administration of the programs by DPIE's Governance Committee. We define success in our programs by typical school measurements such as State Testing Scores and the support we develop in the business community to not only fund our programs but to provide hands-on service in our classrooms. As evidenced by the increase in state testing scores at all levels of education in Dublin, we feel that our programs have produced direct support to improvement at our schools. Both our collaborations with the business community and our volunteer force have increased. With the growth of the Dublin Unified School District to exceed 9000 students this coming school year, we know that DPIE will be able to assist the District when we are asked and able. 24. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea DPIE had to move their offices again this year - to Wells Middle School. The move did not effect any of our efficiency in completing our mission and our core goals but as with any move extra expenses arise. With the growth of Dublin and the Tri-Valley we have experienced many new possible alliances and opportunities to better serve the Dublin Unified School District and the program that they are unable to fund.. A few of these include the beginning stages of the GearUp Workforce program at Valley High, the Wente Arts Foundation regional collaboration for the Arts, the Dublin Walk for Education and the StopWaste initiative. 25. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. High Parent Faculty and Student organization. Most recently, the DPIE Board took action that would allow staff to partner with the middle school PFCs for their assistance in marketing our afterschool art classes in order to fill them to capacity. As a result of this partnership, DPIE will donate to them all proceeds from the class registration fees. While maintaining our separate organizations, our goal is to support the needs of each of these groups, as well as the Dublin Chamber of Commerce and various other businesses in our community and the surrounding area. Specifically, we work with the Administration office of City government on preparing opportunities for the City to share with students with the Inside Dublin program, which educates students on the various local government career opportunities and pathways. The Fire Department and Police Services departments are both valuable partners with DPIE and provide ongoing educational programs for our students and the community. We also partner with other non-profit organizations such as School of Imagination, who have loaned us their bus for field trips for DUSD students. This year, DPIE promoted the City's holiday "Shop Dublin" campaign through our Facebook page. Another non-profit we partner with is the Tri- Valley Non-Profit Alliance. We hope to hope to further expand and strengthen a partnership with the City of Dublin regarding their "Shop Dublin" campaign through promotions on our website, newsletter and Facebook page. We are currently in the process of developing and promoting On the Border, Barons and Jersey Mikes. This partnership which will not only benefit DPIE's business sector stakeholders, but our city and residents, as a whole. We also partner with the Dublin Rotary for the Dictionary project. 26. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. DPIE is able to request funding from a variety of businesses to support our extensive and critically needed programs, but no funding to stay in operation. We have to pay for rent, insurance, supplies, and the general cost of doing business so that we can obtain funding to complete our programs. This Grant has allowed us to use fundraising dollars to meet the needs of the community. Easter Seals Bay Area 2013 Community Grant Easter Seals Kaleidoscope Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Zach Lupton Program Title: Report 5 Administrative Coordinator Telephone: Report 5 925-828-8857 E-Mail: Report 5 zlupton@esba.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 Yes our program has addressed the community need to improve the quality of life for Dublin residents. During this reporting period the participants from all three of our groups, (Community Integration, Teen and Youth Groups) have volunteered their time in community clean ups, social skills, life skills and recreation/leisure activities. The Lead Teachers of these groups work with the parents and schools to establish goals, then create calendars to work on said goals. Within this reporting period, Easter Seals Kaleidoscope hosted an Art & Sound Festival at Kaleidoscope in which every participant entered a piece of art work to be on display and also had given their input on what they would like to have as an outcome of the event. The participants from all groups, created flyers and walked the surrounding neighborhoods to hand out invites door to door. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 37 37.00 Total Program Participants 8 8.00 Total Dublin residents 45.00 45.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 Goals outlined within this application have been met. Our participants have been working on the volunteering, social skills, and life skills. Kaleidoscope has created an environment that is all inclusive for every student that attends our program. We have succeeded in creating a greater sense of independence in our youth students, Page 44 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp helping them learn life skills that will be necessary beyond the influences of Kaleidoscope. We have also created an environment where our students with disabilities have learned to trust and rely on one another, deep friendships have been built between students, and we have seen an increased awareness in community involvement. More and more, our students have come to own a part of Kaleidoscope, have become more involved in planning and implementing activities, and have gained a valuable sense of accomplishment working with their fellow friends. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period? Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted)  No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 5 5.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 3 3.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 5 5.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 13.00 13.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 1 1.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 8 8.00 Seniors (62 and older) 8 8.00 Disabled 1 1.00 Female-Headed Households 18.00 18.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 5 5.00 White 1 1.00 White + HISPANIC 2 2.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 1 1.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White Page 45 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 9.00 9.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 Number of participants served Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 3 3.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 8 8.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 11.00 11.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 n/a FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Page 46 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Report 5 Dublin Grant funds will help to support the salaries of our three (3) Lead Teachers. Lead Teachers are responsible for creating curriculum for each of our groups, youth, teen, and community integration altogether serving 31 students. 5 of which are Dublin residents. Lead Teachers help to improve the experiences of all our students enrolled at Kaleidoscope. Support of these staffing costs is even more critical as the Kaleidoscope program continues to grow as the strongest behavioral program in Alameda County. As a result of continually high success rate of our program, the Regional Center of the East Bay is referring high numbers of youth who require Intensive Behavioral and Social Skills (IBSS) training at a 1:1 student/teacher ratio. While youth requiring 1:1 ratio are the most resource intensive students we serve, the growth and development outcomes for these students are the most impressive. Almost all of these students who exit the program require only a 1:3 or 1:5 ratio. This means that youth are now able to be contributing members of their families and communities. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 Throughout this reporting period, Easter Seals Kaleidoscope has increased the number of participants served from the city of Dublin from five (5) to nine (9). It is with the support of the city grant funds, that we are able to do so. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 Easter Seals Bay Area, Regional Center of the East Bay, Parents, family members, communities, and cities all praise our project. Within the past year we were able to increase the awareness of our program, grow our participant and staff numbers, host an annual Art & Sound event, provide many hours of volunteer opportunities, educate our participants on the benefits of recycling, job searching, social interaction, and leisure activities. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 The major problem that we encountered during this project was maintaining quality staff. During the typical school year, we are only able to hire part time staff. Many people do not want to work 20 hours a week. The staff that we have hired understand it is a part time job during the school year, with full time options during summer/spring/winter breaks and non-school days. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 Easter Seals Kaleidoscope has collaborated with Regional Center of the East Bay, the City of Livermore, Pleasanton, and Dublin. We have also collaborated with City-Serve, Valley Christian Church, Dublin SPCA, First Tee of Pleasanton, and Rosewood Gardens in Livermore. We seek to get our participants into the communities to which they reside. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 City of Livermore - $5000.00 City of Pleasanton - $5000.00 Page 47 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Eden I&R, Inc. 2-1-1 Alameda County Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Mitch Reitman, Development/Marketing Officer Program Title: Report 5 2-1-1 Alameda County Telephone: Report 5 510-537-2710 E-Mail: Report 5 mreitman@edenir.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 The quality of life for Dublin residents is improved by providing 24 hours a day, seven days a week access to 2-1-1 Alameda County, providing a full range of information related to personal and economic self-sufficiency. 2-1-1 was available to all Dublin residents and employees in multiple languages by either dialing the three-digit number, or 1 (888) 886-9660. 2-1-1 Resources Specialists conducted in-depth assessments with callers to determine the full breadth of their circumstances and to gauge their personal skills and strengths. Once that was determined, Resource Specialists utilized complex relational databases to locate services and/or housing that is most appropriate for the caller’s needs. Through Eden I&R’s ongoing partnerships with the Office of Emergency Services, Red Cross, and other local public and nonprofit responders, 2-1-1 was prepared to respond if local disasters occurred. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 104,070 104,070.00 Total Program Participants 603 603.00 Total Dublin residents 104,673.00 104,673.00 TOTAL Page 48 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 Throughout the grant period, 2-1-1: -Continued to provide a central point of entry to health, housing & human service information and referrals for Dublin residents and employees. 2-1-1 assessed the needs of 603 Dublin callers and provided them with 1,031 referrals to health, housing and human services, exceeding the goal by 20%. -Eden I&R succeeded in updating each of the 2,915 program records currently in our service database (which included 153 new programs added this year) at least once. 2-1-1 is the single, central access point for a full range of information related to personal and economic self-sufficiency. -Increased the number of affordable housing units by 4,136 units, exceeding the 450 units projected. The number of housing units listed in Dublin increased to 596. -In-service trainings were conducted weekly. In FY 2014, these trainings included presentations by Tri-Valley agencies such as Child Care Links and East Bay works One-Stop Career Center. -Eden I&R participated in seven events in Dublin in FY 2014, and made presentations and/or distributed 2-1-1 marketing material to an additional eight Dublin organizations. These events included the Dublin Senior Fair, a Veterans Resource Fair, and re-entry fairs at Santa Rita Jail and FCI. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application): Persons  Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 500 500.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 180 180.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 22,924 22,924.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 23,604.00 23,604.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): N/A 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) N/A 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) N/A 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) N/A 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) N/A 0.00 Disabled N/A 0.00 Female-Headed Households 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Page 49 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] N/A 0.00 White N/A 0.00 White + HISPANIC N/A 0.00 Black/African American N/A 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC N/A 0.00 Asian N/A 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC N/A 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native N/A 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC N/A 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander N/A 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC N/A 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White N/A 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC N/A 0.00 Asian and White N/A 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC N/A 0.00 Black/African American and White N/A 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC N/A 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American N/A 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC N/A 0.00 Other/Multi Racial N/A 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Page 50 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 N/A FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 5 Eden I&R/2-1-1 Alameda County was granted these funds to continue operating the free, easily accessible, multilingual phone service 24/7, specifically with the goal to assist 500 Dublin callers. The agency expended the full grant. It is not possible to discern whether all callers are repeat or new because callers often are rushed and only share their city of residency and don't provide additional identifying information. Though 180 unduplicated Dublin callers were served in FY14, the agency has no way of knowing how many of the 283 "general" calls handled from Dublin were unduplicated. The agency's online resource directory was heavily used throughout the year, receiving 1542,326 hits from 159,963 visitors, which represents a more than 30% increase over FY 2013. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 -Fiscal Year 2014, 2-1-1 Resource Specialists handled 104,070 calls and these callers were provided 162,027 health, housing and human service referrals. -All 14 cities are once again financially supporting 2-1-1. We welcomed back the three cities that, due to economic hardships in the past, were unable to sustain 2-1-1 funding. With the beginning of government departments rebounding from the worst of the recession, and the acknowledgement that 2-1-1 has sustained and grown over the past few years, we are grateful and proud that all Alameda County cities understand and support 2-1-1’s role in the fragile health, housing, and human services safety net. -Eden I&R continued its partnership with 2-1-1 San Diego to conduct outreach to eligible individuals and families about the CalFresh food assistance program. For the second year in a row, 2-1-1 Alameda County Phone Resource Specialists significantly increased their proactive outreach to callers about the CalFresh program. Outreach/pre-screenings occurred in 12,229 calls to 2-1-1 during FY 2014, a 70% increase over the previous fiscal year! This partnership is a great example of how 2-1-1 Resource Specialists are trained to conduct a comprehensive assessment with callers whenever possible. Based on the information provided, the caller receives referrals to critical programs they may not have been aware of, such as CalFresh. -2-1-1 again provided referrals to a number of resources throughout the county for holiday food baskets and toys for needy families. 2-1-1 handled 775 calls requesting information about holiday programs and provided 1,054 referrals. -During tax season, once again Eden I&R provided assistance for low-income people and those on active military duty. 2-1-1 Resource Specialists pre-screened and referred 774 callers eligible for the Earned Income Tax Credit. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 We made a concerted and sustained effort to increase outreach in the Tri-Valley in FY 2014. However, with only one dedicated Development/Marketing Officer, it posed a challenge. Eden I&R is considering ways to expand our volunteer presence in the Tri-Valley communities so that more contacts can be made and number of clients and call volume can be sustained. While call volume was lower this year, 2-1-1 met or exceeded all other outcomes Page 51 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp set forth in the grant application (see question 22). As it has the last several years, 2-1-1 handled more than 100,000 calls (104,070). These callers were provided 162,027 health, housing and human service referrals. At the conclusion of each call to 2-1-1, callers are asked two questions: "Is this information better than what you've gotten elsewhere?" and "Have you received enough information to help you with your search?" 99% of callers indicated in the affirmative to both questions in FY 2014. Other methods used to evaluate the program include messages left on the anonymous caller feedback line; analysis of various quantitative and qualitative data; and follow-up calls placed to a select number of 2-1-1 callers within a couple of weeks of their original call to assess their customer service experience and the impact the referrals they were provided had. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 The biggest challenge that continues to face Eden I&R/2-1-1 Alameda County is funding. Despite the high number of calls handled by 2-1-1, we still miss nearly 1,000 calls a month simply because we cannot afford to hire enough staff to field them all. The Marketing/Development Officer and other management staff are constantly working to try and increase our funding stream from diverse sources. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 Eden I&R collaborates with various community agencies and organizations, as well as government departments, on a number of programs designed to empower vulnerable populations and increase economic achievement. In addition, the agency maintains longstanding partnerships with approximately 2,850 property owners/managers and over 1,000 agencies to maintain its databases. For example, the agency is one of nine Bay Area 2-1-1s partnering to develop mutual support systems and data sharing agreements; is an active member/participant of emergency preparedness and planning groups with the County's Office of Emergency Services and the Public Health Department, among others; staff participates in the Tri-Valley Scholarship meetings; is involved in Everyone Home Ending Homelessness in Alameda County; and was a member of the East County's Needs Assessment Steering Committee. Specific collaborations in the Tri-Valley include a partnership with CityServe whose volunteers conduct 2-1-1 outreach; Tri-Valley One Stop Career Centers; Rental Housing Association; and Dublin, Livermore & Pleasanton Libraries and Senior Centers. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 City of Alameda: $25,000 City of Albany: $5,000 City of Berkeley: $35,000 City of Emeryville: $5,000 City of Fremont: $10,000 City of Hayward: $50,000 City of Livermore: $15,000 City of Newark: $15,000 City of Oakland: $100,000 City of Piedmont: $5,000 City of Pleasanton: $16,000 City of San Leandro: $25,000 City of Union City: $10,000 Alameda County Social Services Agency: $60,879 Alameda County Social Services Agency (Medi-Cal): $51,000 Alameda County Workforce Investment Board: $20,000 Alameda County Probation Department: $15,000 Alameda County Public Health Department: $3,000 2-1-1 San Diego/CA Public Health: $41,971 Alameda County Public Health (Medi-Cal): $160,061 Cisco Foundation: $15,000 Colliers International: $1,000 Comerica: $4,000 Eden Area Foundation: $12,000 Eden Township Healthcare District: $10,000 First 5/Every Child Counts: $10,000 Firedoll Foundation: $20,000 Page 52 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Fremont Bank Foundation: $20,000 Kaiser Permanente Northern California Community Benefit Program: $29,166 Computer and Communications Industry Association and the Intuit Financial Freedom Foundation: $20,700 PG&E: $25,000 Safeway Foundation: $3,500 Simpson Strong Tie: $1,000 Thomas J. Long Foundation: $25,000 United Way of the Bay Area: $50,000 Van Loben Sels/Rembe Rock Foundation:$2,500 Walter & Elise Haas Fund: $59,588 Wells Fargo Bank: $5,000 WestAmerica Bank: $1,000 Alameda County Housing and Community Development: $45,000 Page 53 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Hope Hospice, Inc. Grief Support Center Report 1 (submitted 9/4/2014) 1. Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Victoria A. Emmons 2. Program Title: Hope Hospice Grief Support Center 3. Telephone: 925-829-8770 4. E-Mail: victoriaemmons@hopehospice.com 5. Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21-26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. 1 total to date Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. 6. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need & improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? The Grief Support Center offers high quality grief counseling provided by trained professionals for children, teens and adults. These services include telephone guidance and when needed, referrals to professionals in the community. The services offered by the Center are individual and group counseling, educational classes and an annual memorial service to assist grieving people to heal the pain of their grief after the death of a loved one. This program provides compassionate and expert grief counseling not only for the family members of Hope Hospice patients but also for members of the community, including counseling for people whose loved one died suddenly or tragically or has experienced the death of a companion animal. Hope Hospice is the only non-denominational, non-profit organization in Dublin that offers a comprehensive grief support program for the community. 7. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 943 Total Program Participants 943 total to date 36 Total Dublin residents 36 total to date 979.00 TOTAL 8. Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. The following goals as outlined in the application were met: 36 individual assessments 3 parent and 3 spousal/partner loss closed group sessions were held 2 sessions for children (6-12) and teens (13-18) 22 Pet Loss drop-in groups 12 community presentations on specific grief related topics The Grief Support Center and administrative staff at Hope Hospice work collaboratively to ensure that the program goals are met efficiently. There are volunteers who audit client session documentation and an administrative assistant who quantifies the number of people participating in our services. Our success is measured by verbal reports and written evaluations from our clients at the conclusion of individual or group counseling sessions. The Hope Hospice family members are also requested to complete and a Family Evaluation of Bereavement Services 14 months after the death of their loved one. 9. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period? Yes (already submitted invoice/s) 1 total to date Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: 10. Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application): Persons 1 total to date Households 11. Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 36 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 36 total to date 36 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 36 total to date 943 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 943 total to date 1,015.00 TOTAL 12. Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0 total to date 0 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0 total to date 0 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0 total to date 0 Seniors (62 and older) 0 total to date 0 Disabled 0 total to date 0 Female-Headed Households 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 13. List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers "Hispanic" as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 0 White 0 total to date 0 White + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Black/African American 0 total to date 0 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Asian 0 total to date 0 Asian + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 total to date 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 total to date 0 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0 total to date 0 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Asian and White 0 total to date 0 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Black/African American and White 0 total to date 0 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0 total to date 0 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0 Other/Multi Racial 0 total to date 0 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 14. Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. N/A 15. Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 16. If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter “N/A”): N/A 17. Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 18. If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter “N/A”): N/A 19. Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 total to date 0 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0 total to date 0.00 TOTAL 20. Please include any additional comments or clarifications here N/A 21. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. The funds granted through the City of Dublin were used specifically to pay wages for Grief Support Center staff. Our highly trained and experienced grief support providers are key to our ability to offer the quality and variety of grief support services we provide to our complex and diverse community. The services offered through the Grief Support Center require many hours of planning, preparation, participation and follow up, regardless of the number of clients who benefit from the scheduled activity. The services include one-on-one grief support sessions, unique group sessions designed specifically for adults and children, community-based seminars and workshops on grief-related topics, and a library of resource material. A drop-in Pet Loss Support Group was established in 2012. It is our privilege to make these services available at no cost to our hospice families and to members of the Dublin community who have experienced the loss of a love one for any reason. 22. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. The Hope Hospice Grief Support Center is well known in the community for providing services to people whose loved one died as a hospice or hospital patient or died accidentally, tragically and/or by suicide. Many medical and mental health professionals are aware of the services we provide for the community and refer their patients and clients to us. The Grief Support Center is also contacted by various organizations in the community to provide educational programs about grief and coping strategies. Grief may manifest mentally, emotionally, spiritually and physically. In mid-2013, the Grief Support Center staff developed a program called "Stress Reduction: A Path to Peace." This program includes a 2-hour class about how to use the breath to decrease stress and 1/2-hour individual Healing Touch sessions with a master Healing Touch practitioner. This service is offered once a quarter. The Grief Support Providers are also using expressive art to help people process their grief and it is facilitated by a Certified Art Therapist. 23. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh This program is highly successful as measured by 1. positive verbal and written comments received from the participants. 2. overall satisfaction with bereavement services from the Family Evaluation of Bereavement Services Survey (98% satisfied Hope Hospice versus national average 96%) 24. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea There were no problems or delays encountered with the project. 25. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. For the past two years, the Grief Support Center collaborated with The City of Dublin to host the Hope Hospice Annual Service of Remembrance in the Library Community Room. This space provided a sanctuary for our clients to honor and remember their loved ones and reconnect with Hope Hospice clinical staff. This service consists of inspirational poetry, music, candle-lighting and supportive interaction between the staff and participants over refreshments. We also collaborated with the Valley Humane Society to launch our Pet Loss support group. VHS has been very supportive by referring grieving pet owners to this group. The Animal Rescue Foundation provides our children's grief groups with volunteer therapy dogs to provide a calming presence and comfort for the children. In addition, the Art For Life organization brings volunteers, ceramic objects and paint to the last children's grief group to support the children and their parents in the creation of a memory object to honor their deceased loved one. 26. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Other funding sources included: 8 individual donors totaling $1,035.00. Livermore Valley Opera Dublin LVO Student Program ✔ Report 1 submitted: 5/27/2014 1. Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Jim Schmidt LVO Board President 2. Program Title: Dublin LVO Student Program 3. Telephone: 925-443-5450 4. E-Mail: jims2ndlife@yahoo.com 5. Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21-26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. 1 total to date Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. 6. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need & improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Introductions and education in the Arts has suffered especially in the recent years of educational cutbacks. This program has introduced opera and classical music to 1,230 students via school assemblies. Professional singers conducted a short age-appropriate short opera, plus provided entertaining education about opera. The assemblies were well-received by teachers and administrators. 7. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 1,230 Total Program Participants 1,230 total to date 1,230 Total Dublin residents 1,230 total to date 2,460.00 TOTAL 2,460.00 TOTAL 8. Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. The goal was to visit 300 students. This grant greatly exceeded that number with 1,230 students visited. Early on LVO met with the school administration and followed their advice to visit Fredrickson and Donlon schools. We develop a (new to LVO) assembly program that was age appropriate and was modified from the lower grades to the upper grades. I am happy to report that Frederiksen served as the pilot school for this kind of program. 9. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period? Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) 1 total to date No (no expenditures this period) Other: 10. Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application): Persons 1 total to date Households 11. Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 300 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 300 total to date 1,230 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 1,230 total to date C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 1,530.00 TOTAL 1,530.00 TOTAL 12. Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 1230 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 1,230 total to date Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) Seniors (62 and older) Disabled Female-Headed Households 1,230.00 TOTAL 1,230.00 TOTAL 13. List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers "Hispanic" as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] White White + HISPANIC Black/African American Black/African American + HISPANIC Asian Asian + HISPANIC American Indian/Alaskan Native American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC Asian and White Asian and White + HISPANIC Black/African American and White Black/African American and White + HISPANIC American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC Other/Multi Racial 1230 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 1,230 total to date 1,230.00 TOTAL 1,230.00 TOTAL 14. Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Not Required 15. Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 1,230 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 1,230 total to date Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 1,230.00 TOTAL 1,230.00 TOTAL 16. If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter “N/A”): Not Required 17. Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 1230 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 1,230 total to date Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 1,230.00 TOTAL 1,230.00 TOTAL 18. If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter “N/A”): N/A 19. Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 1230 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 1,230 total to date Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 1,230.00 TOTAL 1,230.00 TOTAL 20. Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Questions 12-20 not required but I cannot submit the report without filling in something. 21. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. The purpose of the grant was to bring opera education to Dublin students, and to host Dublin students to a free Student Performance of LVO' October and March operas as the Bankhead Theater in Livermore. Both halves required expenditures, plus rehearsal time for the new assembly program. All funds were expended. 22. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. 630 students at Frederiksen and 600 at Murray Elementary were provided an introduction to opera by professional and skilled singers. Flyers were distributed inviting students and parents to the Student Performance. Relatively few student came to this, just as few came from Pleasanton in the initial year. This number grows larger after time. This project addresses the need to provide music education in the elementary grades. The creative method was to create an engaging program which could be age appropriate from 1 through 8 grades. Then two assemblies were scheduled on the same day. That made it efficient for the singers to travel and perform for a fee LVO could afford. 23. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, why? The program was a success. Besides exceeding the stated goals, LVO received favorable feedback from teachers and administrators. 24. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Since a new assembly program was developed, and a new team was formed, the program was late in starting in the fall of 2013. That will not be problem in the future. 25. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Meetings were held with the Dublin Unified School District. We were given encouragement, advice, and contacts for the schools to be scheduled. 26. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. No other funding sources for Dublin residents were received. All grants for the Student Education program restrict expenditures to their students. Open Heart Kitchen Dublin Meal Program Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Linda McKeever Executive Director Program Title: Report 5 Dublin meal program Telephone: Report 5 925 580 1616 E-Mail: Report 5 executivedirector@openheartkitchen.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes.  Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 Open Heart Kitchen served nutritious hot meals to low income residents of Dublin and Weekend Box Lunches to low income Dublin children in Dublin schools and low income residents of the Groves and camellia Place ( new program) This reporting period Served a total of 2,297hot meals and 10,257 box lunches. total YTD 8,590 Dublin hot meals and YTD 37,285 weekend box lunches to Dublin children. By providing healthy meals for low income underserved residents of Dublin we help improve the health and well being of the Dublin community. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 668 668.00 Total Program Participants 488 488.00 Total Dublin residents 1,156.00 1,156.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 We have exceeded our goal of providing 150-200 hot meals to low income families and adults. We have served 2,297 hot meals to low income Dublin residents and 37,285 box lunches to children of low income families in Dublin schools YTD. Qtr numbers above. Page 62 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 150-200 0.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 488 488.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 668 668.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 1,156.00 1,156.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 133 133.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 192 192.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 163 163.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 79 79.00 Seniors (62 and older) 15 15.00 Disabled 86 86.00 Female-Headed Households 668.00 668.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 122 122.00 White 64 64.00 White + HISPANIC 28 28.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 76 76.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 4 4.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 25 25.00 Asian and White 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 2 2.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC Page 63 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 128 128.00 Other/Multi Racial 39 39.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 488.00 488.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 meals served Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 488 488.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 70 70.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 558.00 558.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 N/A FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 5 The Goal was to feed healthy meals to low income residents in Dublin. The funds have all be spent and the goal was met. Page 64 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 This year we moved our hot meal program site. The move has been successful more Dublin residents are now accessing the program. The new site is closer to the wheels bus access. This year we have also added weekend box access points for the summer. We will be dropping off weekend box lunches to Dublin school children at the Groves, Camilla Place and the summer school locations. Our programs continue to grow with the needs of the community. We work with the local social service agencies and school district to access the community need for healthy meals for the low income population of Dublin. Starting July 1st we will also be adding the Dublin senior meal program to our programs to meet the Dublin community needs. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 We feel the program was a success. We measure success in 2 ways: Have we meet the meal goal of for units of service and are we within budget. We successfully exceeded the meal count goal and we stayed within budget. We served a total of 46,235 meals in Dublin. 8,950 hot meals and 37,285 weekend box meals to Dublin low income school children. This year we moved the hot meal program and the new location has been successful for the community, the meal counts and the number of Dublin residents has been increasing. We are now serving the weekend box lunch program all summer long. So we feel we are meeting the goals by expanding our service to match the Dublin community needs. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 N/A FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 Alameda County food bank to purchase food for the program. The local churches for volunteers and financial support. Local businesses for volunteers and financial support. Tri- Valley Haven for referrals. Axis Community health referrals. 211 referrals. we help local food pantries with food donations, storage and distribution. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 Our general funds are used for this project. yhe sources are described in the proposal. Local churches, local businesses, grants, foundations, individual contributions and fund raising events. Page 65 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Pacific Chamber Symphony "Music is Fun!" educational assemblies for elementary schools Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Maryann Brent, Freelance Grant Writer Program Title: Report 5 Music is Fun! educational assemblies for elementary schools Telephone: Report 5 925 324-2775 E-Mail: Report 5 LawrenceKohl@hotmail.com Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 The PCS assembly project presented the gift of musical performance and introduced concepts to a young audience that might not otherwise have enjoyed this opportunity. Further, as a universal language music easily crosses cultural boundaries and offers the possibility of social cohesiveness during followup teacher-student discussions and other individual expressions, such as student artwork and letter writing to PCS. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 0.00 Total Program Participants 1,100 1,100.00 Total Dublin residents 1,100.00 1,100.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 Four concert assemblies were successfully performed on June 5, 2014 at Murray Elementary School (8435 Davona Drive, Dublin. 925-828-2568. 9:30 a.m. and 10:10 a.m.) and Frederiksen Elementary School (7243 Tamarack Drive, Dublin. 925-828-1037. 1:15 p.m. and 1:50 p.m.). Students created remarkable drawings and articulate letters to PCS expressing their appreciation for the Page 66 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp assembly concerts. Also the PCS director and musicians discussed the schools' preferences and opinions with teachers to refine the project for future assemblies. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 3600 3,600.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 1100 1,100.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 0 0.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 4,700.00 4,700.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) 0 0.00 Disabled 0 0.00 Female-Headed Households 0.00 0.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 0 0.00 White 0 0.00 White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Black/African American 0 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Asian 0 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Asian and White 0 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Black/African American and White 0 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American Page 67 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 n/a FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 5 The original purpose for the community grant was to offer a total of four (4) flute, clarinet, trumpet, violin and cello quintet assembly performances at elementary schools. The music selections featured diverse cultures and time periods in order to teach fundamental musical concepts such as rhythm, melody, acoustics, timbre, harmony, form, and style. Page 68 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp The symphony spent the entire grant amount. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 The project helped to bridge cultural, social and economic hurdles in the community by the very nature of music, by virtue of its universality. It introduced concepts that will extend throughout the young person's lifetime and that can be applied to other areas of cognitive investigation, including those of harmony, form, and style. The methodology for feedback left nothing to chance. It involved teachers (by providing them with instructive packets) and students (by requesting letters or art as a response to the performances). The results of these replies are always different and always instructive for PCS. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 PCS can confirm that the project met our goals and was a stunning success. We measured the success of the project by evaluating the feedback from participating teachers and students. Teachers returned completed feedback forms and the children sent us drawings and letters. The feedback from everyone was overwhelmingly positive. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 We did not experience any notable problems or delays. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 PCS collaborated with the Dublin School District and the staff at Murray and Frederiksen Elementary Schools. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 Hacienda Child Development Fund: $1,000. Page 69 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Spectrum Community Services Meals on Wheels for Dublin's Homebound Seniors Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 4 Tara Marino Program Title: Report 4 Program Manager Telephone: Report 4 5108810300 ext. 222 E-Mail: Report 4 tmarino@spectrumcs.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes.  Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 4 Spectrum Community Services Meals on Wheels program provides hot, nutritious meals and check-ins for homebound seniors. Each year we aim to serve a minimum of 35 homebound Dublin seniors, 3500 healthy meals. Seniors receiving Meals on Wheels through Spectrum are not be able to prepare food for themselves and may be living alone. The program helps Dublin seniors remain independent and in their homes. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 39 39.00 Total Program Participants 4 4.00 Total Dublin residents 43.00 43.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 4 This quarter we continue to serve all homebound Dublin seniors in need of home delivered meals. We have reached our goal of 35 unduplicated Dublin seniors and serve 3500 meals. We have currently served 46 unduplicated Dublin seniors and nearly 6,689 hot, nutritious meals. Each year, the number of homebound Dublin seniors served increases as more seniors learn about our program and we have continued to serve all of those in need without putting individuals on a wait list. Page 71 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 35 35.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 4 4.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 39 39.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 78.00 78.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 3 3.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 1 1.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 4 4.00 Seniors (62 and older) 4 4.00 Disabled 1 1.00 Female-Headed Households 13.00 13.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 3 3.00 White 1 1.00 White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC Page 72 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 4.00 4.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 4 Meals Served Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 4 4.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 4.00 4.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 4 N/A FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 4 Dublin grant funds have helped cover the staff and travel costs of one Meals On Wheels delivery route in Dublin. Specifically, grant funds covered 1) the mileage for that route, estimated to be 6,144 miles a year at a reimbursement rate of $0.555 per mile, 2) grant funds were also used to cover the part-time salary and benefits for the Meals On Wheels Delivery Driver who covers that route, a full time equivalent of 25%. Page 73 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 4 Thanks to funding by Alameda County Meals on Wheels, we have been able to expand the hours and scope of work for our Pleasanton/Dublin Meals on Wheels Coordinator. Jennifer Nelson has been able to do more outreach events in Dublin and promote the program and inform Dublin residents and seniors about our service. She's also been recruiting more volunteers to help us continue to reach all the homebound seniors in need. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 4 Spectrum's Meals on Wheels program has been a success as we have been able to meet the needs of Dublin's homebound seniors by providing them healthy, hot meals, that they would otherwise, go without. We met and exceeded our goals and each year we serve in Dublin the number of seniors receiving home delivered meals continues to grow. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 4 N/A FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 4 Alameda County Meals on Wheels-fundraising and program support ValleyCare Health Systems-Spectrum purchases the home delivered meals from the hospital Alameda County Area Agency on Aging FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 4 Funding from Alameda County Area Agency on Aging Alameda County Meals on Wheels Senior donations Page 74 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Senior Support Program of the Tri Valley Case Management Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Marlene Petersen Program Title: Report 5 Case Management Telephone: Report 5 925-931-5378 E-Mail: Report 5 mpetersen@ssptv.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes.  Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 The case management program successfully responds to unmet community needs by serving as a one-stop- resource shop. With the addition of senior housing in Dublin, our case managers have received more and more requests for services. To accommodate for the Mandarin/Cantonese-speaking populations in Dublin, we also have a staff member and volunteers who translate. Case management cases also continue to become more complex. For example, Ms. C is a 62-year-old, low-income Dublin resident without family or friends in the area. A neighbor who received Farmer's Market coupons from a Senior Support case manager suggested Ms. C contact Senior Support for assistance. Ms. C's case manager discovered she was off her depression medication, since she was struggling to financially make ends meet and did not have health insurance. The case manager enrolled Ms. C in Medicare, helped Ms. C apply and receive a Wiesner grant to pay her rent for 2 months, signed Ms. C up for a Kaiser plan, and helped organize her finances. Shortly after insurance approval, Ms. C had a couple of UTIs and was able to receive the medical care she needed. Ms. C is relieved she has medical coverage and can fill her prescriptions; she is feeling optimistic about the future and has even scheduled meetings with a psychologist. This is one example of how case managers' ability to help coordinate services can lead to overall improvements in health. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 33 33.00 Total Program Participants 33 33.00 Total Dublin residents 66.00 66.00 TOTAL Page 70 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 Our case managers continue to make a difference in the lives of the seniors we serve. Senior Support (SSPTV) continues to provide greatly needed services to older adults in our community. Our seniors' needs continue to grow as they age in our community. SSPTV case managers served 33 new seniors this year along with 30 seniors with one-time-serves; we provided information and referral to approximately 351 Dublin residents and provided 359 visits. Success in case management is defined by improvements in the quality of life for the seniors who have received our services. This improvement may be evident in a cleaner living environment or simply in the relationship forged between the case manager and senior client. Case management is all about small successes. Our primary function is to provide seniors the tools and support that will enable them to make the choices necessary to maintain their independence, improve their quality of life and ensure their safety and well being with dignity. This program’s success can be measured by the fact that all seniors served this quarter were provided with one or more services to assist them in remaining independent. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 52 52.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 63 63.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 63 63.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 178.00 178.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 6 6.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 27 27.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 63 63.00 Seniors (62 and older) 0.00 Disabled 12 12.00 Female-Headed Households 108.00 108.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 19 19.00 White 2 2.00 White + HISPANIC 10 10.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 1 1.00 Asian Page 71 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 1 1.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 33.00 33.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 Visits/Services Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 33 33.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 33.00 33.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 One-Time-Only Services Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 30 30.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 30.00 30.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Page 72 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 We are so grateful for your continued support of aging services! Funding has allowed us to provide essential case management services to Dublin seniors. We are also thankful for Dublin Pride Week; during this time, we were able to provide many of our seniors with volunteers to complete special projects, such as flipping mattresses and cleaning windows, they would otherwise not be able to do. We also enjoyed collaborating with the City of Dublin and Alameda County Fire Department for the Wishes to Warm the Winter Chill holiday gift program. Seniors, who otherwise would not have received a gift during the holidays, thoroughly enjoyed receiving a beautifully wrapped package; this was a special treat for our seniors. These events bring so much joy to the seniors; they not only love the projects, but they love the volunteers who visit with them. Please note since this is the final report we have used the year totals instead of the quarterly. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 5 The original purpose for the case management program was to deliver free, comprehensive services to seniors aged 60 and older in Dublin to foster independence, promote safety and well-being, preserve dignity, and improve quality of life. With our case management department and support from over 125 volunteers, we are able to carry out this goal. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 Senior Support’s case management team has helped coordinate several volunteer events. For instance, the Dublin Rotary project helped seniors with tasks they could not safely accomplish on their own. Various companies, church groups, and other generous community members volunteered their time to assist with household tasks. From cleaning windows and gutters to removing weeds from a hilly backyard, these events successfully responded to older adults’ needs. Connecting seniors to resources within their community is one way we help meet their needs. Additionally, our case management team must come up with creative assistance methods customized for each seniors. For example, Ms. B felt anxious about many aspects of her life, including her finances, diet, and overall health. Her case manager was able to to break down one large set of worries into manageable tasks. The case manager set up nutrition appointments with Senior Support's registered dietitian to review dietary guidelines to manage Ms. B's diabetes and counseling appointments to help understand . The case manager helped Ms. B sort her mail, which she stored in bags, missing important bills. Even holding a piece of mail made Ms. B shake with anxiety. After the case manager went through the mail with her, Ms. B is now caught up on her bills and feels prepared to sort mail as it comes in. The coordination of services has been key to mitigating Ms. B's anxiety, and she now has a friend, her case manager, to help her navigate any obstacles that come her way. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 Senior Support feels the case management program is a great success, as the goals outlined on the application were met and exceeded. We measure success by tracking progress thorough pre/post and annual assessments, in conjunction with vital observations. In-home visits are key in helping case managers assess needs and progress. As case managers work with seniors through telephone consultations and repeat in-home visits, improvements in activities of daily living (ADLs) and indirect activities of daily living (IADLs) are seen. Progress is evident in various ways, such as when a senior: remains independent in their home, no longer makes frequent calls to emergency services, and has a cleaner living environment. These quality of life improvements confirm our program’s success. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 Fortunately, we did not encounter any problems or delays. Page 73 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 From over 32 years of experience as an organization, we realize the importance of coordinating as a team to deliver services older adults need most. We have relationships with numerous senior housing facilities, Kaiser, Valley Care, Tri-Valley senior centers, Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department, Open Heart Kitchen, Dial-a-Ride, Paratransit, community churches, Meals-on-Wheels, community food banks, and Tri-Valley emergency responders. While we often receive referrals from these agencies, we also rely on these relationships to serve as valuable resources for our seniors. Overall, these partnerships help us better understand the unique challenges seniors face and deliver services addressing the whole person. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 Our program fortunately received a small grant from the Area Agency on Aging and private donations to serve Tri-Valley seniors; however, we rely on support from Tri-Valley cities to fund this program. We continually seek additional funding, but grants funding case management services for older adults are scarce. The Eastern Alameda County Needs Assessment confirms there is a misconception that the Tri-Valley is generally prosperous, and there is no need to expand behavioral health services. In reality, the majority of seniors we serve are considered "near poor," meaning they do not qualify for federal assistance but are not able to make ends meet. We have seen so many improvements through Senior Support's case management program and recognize the need for these services to continue. On behalf of Senior Support's board, staff, volunteers, and seniors, thank you so much for your support; you have truly helped us make a difference in the lives of so many seniors. Page 74 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Tri-Valley Haven's Domestic Violence Services Program ✔ Report 1 submitted: 8/28/2014 1. Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Cynthia Cunningham Morales 2. Program Title: Data Manager 3. Telephone: 925-449-5845 4. E-Mail: cynthia@trivalleyhaven.org 5. Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21-26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. 1 total to date Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. 6. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need & improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? The project addresses three Dublin Areas of Concern: Domestic Violence, Homelessness and Food and Nutrition. Domestic Violence is the primary cause of homelessness for women in the US. Shiloh provides a confidential shelter and supportive case management, educational therapeutic and support groups and individual counseling to assist survivors of domestic violence and their children in preparing to establish a new household free from abuse. While in our domestic violence shelter, residents utilize the Haven Pantry to obtain free groceries during their stay, enabling them to save more money. Our Life Skills groups provide information about nutrition and meal planning to shelter residents. Our Crisis Line provides crisis counseling and safety planning and links survivors who do not require shelter with other Haven programs such as counseling, legal assistance or the food pantry. 7. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 1727 Total Program Participants 1,727 total to date 91 Total Dublin residents 91 total to date 1,818.00 TOTAL 1,818.00 TOTAL 8. Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. We exceeded our projected goal of serving 65 Dublin residents by serving 91 Dublin residents. The program was carried out efficiently by shelter staff funded by this grant, and by volunteers who assist with Crisis Line coverage and providing childcare at the shelter while the moms participate in groups. 9. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period? Yes (already submitted invoice/s) 1 total to date Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: 10. Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application): Persons 1 total to date Households 11. Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 65 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 65 total to date 91 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 91 total to date 1727 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 1,727 total to date 1,883.00 TOTAL 1,883.00 TOTAL 12. Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): n/a Low Income (50% to 80% Median) n/a Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) n/a Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) n/a Seniors (62 and older) n/a Disabled n/a Female-Headed Households 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 13. List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers "Hispanic" as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] n/a White n/a White + HISPANIC n/a Black/African American n/a Black/African American + HISPANIC n/a Asian n/a Asian + HISPANIC n/a American Indian/Alaskan Native n/a American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC n/a Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander n/a Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC n/a American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White n/a American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC n/a Asian and White n/a Asian and White + HISPANIC n/a Black/African American and White n/a Black/African American and White + HISPANIC n/a American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American n/a American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC n/a Other/Multi Racial n/a Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 14. Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. n/a 15. Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 16. If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter “N/A”): n/a 17. Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 18. If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter “N/A”): n/a 19. Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 20. Please include any additional comments or clarifications here n/a 21. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Funds were granted to support our domestic violence shelter program and crisis line. All funds were spent 22. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. In addition to the services provided as described above, Tri-Valley Haven conducts outreach to the community at the St. Patrick’s Day parade and through community education presentations. We are also active on social media and provide information to local media outlets about services and events. We conduct annual briefings with Dublin Police Services to update them about our services and give them an opportunity to meet our Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Program Directors in order to maintain a good working relationship so that they will feel confident in recommending Tri-Valley Haven as a resource when they respond to domestic violence calls. 23. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Yes; the program was very successful, exceeding stated goals by almost 50%. The measure of success is different for each client, depending upon that individual’s needs and circumstances. We pride ourselves in providing trauma- informed care that is sensitive to the impact domestic violence has had on the family and empowering clients to identify and strive towards their own goals 24. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea There were no problems or delays. 25. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. We have MOU’s with over 40 agencies throughout Alameda County to ensure coordinated service delivery, including Dublin Police Services. 26. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Not applicable. Tri-Valley Haven Tri-Valley Haven's Homeless Services Program ✔ Report 1 submitted: 8/28/2014 1. Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Cynthia Cunningham Morales 2. Program Title: Data Manager 3. Telephone: 925-449-5845 4. E-Mail: cynthia@trivalleyhaven.org 5. Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source). Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21-26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. 1 total to date Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. 6. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need & improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? The Tri-Valley Haven Homeless and Family Services program not only met, but exceeded their goal for 2013-2014 Fiscal Year. The Food Pantry provides free food and personal necessities to low income, homeless, and “at risk of becoming homeless” Tri-Valley residents. Clothing vouchers, referrals to other social services and emergency assistance with housing and transportation is also provided. We collaborate with the ACCFB to provide Food Stamp Outreach and the Valley Humane Society to provide free pet food twice a month. We continue to network with the local community to gain donors and to outreach to local communities to educate residents about our services. This reporting period we provided 56 referrals to other social services to Dublin residents. 7. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 5220 Total Program Participants 5,220 total to date 323 Total Dublin residents 323 total to date 5,543.00 TOTAL 5,543.00 TOTAL 8. Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the success and impact. This agency believes the food pantry program is a success. Success is defined by our ability to meet, and hopefully exceed, the needs of our program participants from the Tri-Valley community. Tri-Valley Haven exceeded the original objective of serving 300 Dublin homeless or near-homeless individuals. Through our Food Pantry we actually served 323 unduplicated individual Dublin clients. 282 of these were extremely low income, 28 were disabled head of households, 54 were female headed households, and 74 were senior households. We provided 56 social service referrals to Dublin clients. 9. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period? Yes (already submitted invoice/s) 1 total to date Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: 10. Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application): Persons 1 total to date Households 11. Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 300 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 300 total to date 323 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 323 total to date 5220 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 5,220 total to date 5,843.00 TOTAL 5,843.00 TOTAL 12. Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): n/a Low Income (50% to 80% Median) n/a Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) n/a Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) n/a Seniors (62 and older) n/a Disabled n/a Female-Headed Households 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 13. List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers "Hispanic" as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] n/a White n/a White + HISPANIC n/a Black/African American n/a Black/African American + HISPANIC n/a Asian n/a Asian + HISPANIC n/a American Indian/Alaskan Native n/a American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC n/a Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander n/a Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC n/a American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White n/a American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC n/a Asian and White n/a Asian and White + HISPANIC n/a Black/African American and White n/a Black/African American and White + HISPANIC n/a American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American n/a American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC n/a Other/Multi Racial n/a Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 14. Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. n/a 15. Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 16. If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter “N/A”): n/a 17. Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 18. If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter “N/A”): n/a 19. Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. n/a Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 TOTAL 0.00 TOTAL 20. Please include any additional comments or clarifications here N/A 21. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Tri-Valley Haven’s Homeless Services Program will provide assistance with issues related to homelessness through the shelter, job readiness/job search Life Skills education and the Food Pantry 22. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Tri-Valley Haven Food Pantry provided any household in need with free food (ACCFB programs, in addition to donated food), personal hygiene items, household items, clothing vouchers, emergency transportation and housing, and referral resources to local social service programs and agencies. New clientele, on-going clientele and returning clientele who had been self-sustaining but unfortunately found themselves requiring help again, continue to receive our services. We actively network and outreach to the local community to solicit donations to meet the needs of our program participants. The Food Pantry Coordinator did Outreach to several Pleasanton residential communities to educate residents about our services. We continue to collaborate with the ACCFB to provide Food Stamp Outreach and the Valley Humane Society to provide free pet supplies twice a month. We also held several Homeless Outreach events to provide clients with seasonal supplies, as well as Thanksgiving and December programs to provide holiday food and gifts. 23. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Yes this agency believes the food pantry program is a success. Success is defined by our ability to meet, and hopefully exceed, the needs of our program participants from the Tri-Valley community. Tri-Valley Haven exceeded the original objective of serving 300 Dublin homeless or near-homeless individuals. The pantry actually served 323 unduplicated individual Dublin clients. 282 of these were extremely low income, 28 were disabled head of households, 54 were female headed households, and 74 were senior households. We provided 56 social service referrals to Dublin clients. 24. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Not applicable. 25. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. The Tri-Valley Haven Food Pantry receives a monthly food delivery from the Alameda County Food Bank consisting of USDA and Emergency Food Boxes. The Food Pantry is a member of the Tri-Valley Hunger Coalition with other Livermore food pantries and Open Heart Kitchen. This allows pantries to share resources and work together to meet the growing need. A consortium of local churches funds the ESTA (Emergency Short Term Assistance) Program, administered by the Food Pantry Coordinator, which allows the Haven to provide emergency motel, transportation and food assistance for at-risk-for-homelessness clients. The Haven Food Pantry benefits from food drives sponsored by local churches, businesses and schools. Volunteers pick up food donated from local stores. Private donors provide gift cards which allow the Haven to purchase items in low supply or items to meet special dietary requirements. We continue to collaborate with the ACCFB to provide monthly Food Stamp Outreach and the Valley Humane Society to provide free pet supplies once a month. 26. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Not applicable Tri-Valley Housing Opportunity Center Community Stabilization Program Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Annika Olson, Executive Director Program Title: Report 5 Community Stablization Program Telephone: Report 5 925-373-3130 Ext. 301 E-Mail: Report 5 annika@tvhoc.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 The TVHOC served 76 Dublin households during the recent grant year (July 2013 through June 2014) with extensive housing related services totaling approximately 300 hours of dedicated staff time. The primary services offered were: pre-purchase first time home buyer education, pre-purchase counseling, default and delinquency counseling, financial education (Understanding Credit and Budgeting),and free tax preparation assistance. The TVHOC provided a total of 6, 8-hour HUD-approved home buyer education courses at Las Positas College; 13 Dublin households attended home buyer education services through the TVHOC. The TVHOC supported 5 additional first time home buyers in the purchase of their first home. The services provided by the TVHOC clearly supports first time home buyers in navigating the complex system of purchasing a home. By effectively pre- screening BMR candidates, the TVHOC saves Dublin city employees valuable time in the screening process for BMR candidates. The TVHOC collaborated with other housing agencies in the area and community partners to provide essential financial education skills to senior and low income populations. These classes were offered on site to households and with additional live translation services as well (ie. Mandarin). An additional 35 households were supported through phone calls from residents that reached out to the Center in order to gain support around rental housing and legal assistance. Six (6) Dublin households walked in to the Center to gather supportive information about affordable housing options within the Tri-Valley. This highlights the need for additional supportive services and resources for those families that are currently renting, and may not be financially viable to purchase, or may not qualify for affordable home ownership opportunities offered through the City of Dublin. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 626 626.00 Total Program Participants 76 76.00 Total Dublin residents Page 87 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 702.00 702.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 The TVHOC provided home buyer education to 13 new Dublin households throughout the year. A total of 43 new households received financial education. One new Dublin household received pre-purchase counseling. Foreclosure/ mortgage delinquency counseling to 1 new Dublin households throughout the year, suggesting that Dublin residents have a smaller percentage of homeowners that are struggling to stay in their homes. The TVHOC provided free tax preparation services to 17 new Dublin households. The TVHOC fielded over 35 phone calls from new Dublin households inquiring about rental resources, legal services, and default/ delinquency support and supported 6 walk- in households looking for housing/ shelter support. The numbers reflected in this report illustrate that Dublin residents are for the most part primarily seeking homebuyer/ homeownership opportunities within the Tri-Valley and that the TVHOC is a recognized resource in helping them to achieve these goals. Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application): Persons  Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 90 90.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 76 76.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 626 626.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 792.00 792.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): 7 7.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 47 47.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 11 11.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 24 24.00 Seniors (62 and older) 4 4.00 Disabled 10 10.00 Female-Headed Households 103.00 103.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] 34 34.00 White 12 12.00 White + HISPANIC 1 1.00 Black/African American Page 88 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 17 17.00 Asian 0 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Asian and White 0 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 Black/African American and White 0 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + HISPANIC 1 1.00 Other/Multi Racial 0 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 65.00 65.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 Hours of service/ case management Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: 325 325.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 325 325.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 325 325.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 975.00 975.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. N/A 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. Page 89 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 N/A FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 5 - 16 Dublin HH with 8-hour HUD-approved Homebuyer Education class. The course will assess homebuyer readiness, teach money and credit management, mortgage loan products, avoiding predatory lending and post- purchase education to maintain your home; aimed at creating sustainable housing situations and educating clients on protecting home investments. Outreach to low-income, limited English speaking households, traditionally besieged by predatory lending practices, will be specifically targeted. The TVHOC works with clients to address challenges such as credit and savings requirements, and increase the number of qualified applicants for the housing programs in Dublin. - 6 Dublin HH Financial Literacy class. Program will include one-on-one case management to assist individuals to develop a monthly spending plan (budget), establish/improve credit, access banking services and guard against predatory lending practices and identify theft. - 45 Dublin HH with free tax preparation services through the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program to assist very-low and low-income households with Earned Income Tax credits which can be reinvested into the community. TVHOC plans to target affordable housing complexes within Dublin and provide tax preparation onsite to ensure households are aware of this free service. - 15 Dublin HH with foreclosure/mortgage delinquency 1-1 counseling, assist with lender loan modification applications, and communication with lenders. The TVHOC will implement its Foreclosure Recovery and Community Stabilization Program by partnering with other organizations to connect residents with real estate and legal services and advice on other options to avoid foreclosure, and to assist residents that have been victimized by predatory loan modification scams. - 4 Employer Assisted Housing sessions to Dublin businesses customized to assist employers in recruitment, retention and jobs-housing balance. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 The Center provided culturally competent financial education services to low income and uniquely diverse populations of all age ranges including both Senior populations and at risk youth. The Center utilized collaborative relationships with affordable housing developers (Eden Housing), financial education providers (National Budget Planners), and service providers to at risk youth (East Bay Youth Initiative) to deliver services. The Center's shifting approach to addressing the needs of the community on a preventative level, rather than a reactive level has indeed proved to be of value and created impact in the community. The Center responded to the particular cultural needs of the communities it served by providing live translation of educational courses in Mandarin and Spanish. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 The Center believes that the Community Stabilization Program was successful. This is supported by the fact that first time home buyers receiving education and one on one counseling have remained in their homes have continued to make payments on their mortgages. The Center supported first time home buyers in avoiding questionable loan products (such as adjustable rate mortgages or interest-only payment structured loans. The number of Dublin households that received financial education was substantially more than the targeted goal for this fiscal year. Of the households that received mortgage default counseling, none of the households counseled were foreclosed upon. Through one on one counseling, homeowners received unbiased information regarding their various options with regards to their mortgages/ homes, and either worked with their lenders to modify their loan or develop a strategy to exit the property gracefully and secure sustainable housing. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Page 90 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Report 5 The Center provided financial education courses to pregnant and parenting teens enrolled in high school and independent living courses at the Alternative High School in Dublin--Valley Continuation High School. The courses aim at increasing basic budgeting, credit management, and independent living skills to at risk youth. The Center is actively trying to expand programs which provide assistance to Hispanic populations. The Center has created a relationship with Axis Community Health, a trusted resource and medical provider for Hispanic households in the Tri-Valley region. The Center has started offering First time home buyer education classes in Spanish, however additional resources and more permanent bilingual staff are needed in order to expand outreach and direct services. Active engagement in community outreach events should be continued in order to further help community members identify the Center as a tangible resource in the Tri-Valley region. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 -Eden Housing--financial education, donated space -National Budget Planners – financial education (Budgeting and Understanding Credit), in-kind donation of instructors and space to hold classes. -RDH Education Services – in-kind donation of homebuyer education instruction. -Cities of Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton, San Ramon, and Town of Danville – technical assistance, marketing, outreach, in-kind donation of space -East Bay Youth Initiative-collaboration on providing financial education to at risk youth. -Axis Community Health-outreach and collaboration for various programs and classes FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 City of Pleasanton--$25,000 HUD--$17,059 Wells Fargo--$15,000 Livermore Rotary--$5,000 LLNS--$5,000 National Association of Realtors--$4,000 Livermore Rotary Minigrant--$500 United Way of the Bay Area (VITA)--$8,500 Women's Council of Realtors--$1,000 National Foreclosure Mitigation Council (NFMC)--$5398 Page 91 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Tri-Valley YMCA Family Engagement at Emerald Vista Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 5 Kenny Altenburg, Branch Operations Director Program Title: Report 5 Family Engagement at Emerald Vista Telephone: Report 5 925.263.4444 E-Mail: Report 5 kaltenburg@ymcaeastbay.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 5 The Tri-Valley YMCA is helping to strengthen the Emerald Vista community. We have provided parent education and support and served as a community resource and referral agency. We have also provided tangible goods for families, including household goods, clothing, school supplies and furniture. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 135 135.00 Total Program Participants 135 135.00 Total Dublin residents 270.00 270.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 5 To date, we have been most successful in two areas listed in our initial proposal: 1. Provide families with connections to appropriate community resources. 2. Provide parents with education and support to more effectively parent their children. The 3rd goal was a focus on education on healthy living (nutrition classes, wellness activities, and events, etc). Throughout the year, we had a lot more success in these areas through the curriculum we were able to provide to the kids on site. Page 96 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period?  Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted) No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 130 130.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 135 135.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 0.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 265.00 265.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): n/a 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) 0.00 Disabled 0.00 Female-Headed Households 0.00 0.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] n/a 0.00 White 0.00 White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + Page 97 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp HISPANIC 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 5 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 5 n/a FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 5 This grant was intended to be used for 50% of a FTE staff person to oversee family engagement at Emerald Vista. While it wasn't fully funded, we were still able to put several staff members in charge of this project on a part time basis. All of the funds were used. Page 98 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 5 This program greatly affected the families at Emerald Vista, and helped us to leverage our work there to build outside partnerships. Not only were we able to bring in resources to teach the kids about healthy nutrition and active lifestyle, but we were also able to bring in outside resources for families. We had a PT Case Manager who referred families to resources in the community when they needed them the most. In addition to this, we were able to distribute donations that the Y received to various families in our program there. Finally, our staff were able to create behavior plans with our Case Manager, and share some of these techniques with the families we were working with. This allowed these adults to more effectively parent their children. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 5 Yes we do! We definitely had to learn how to meet these parents where they were at, and had to overcome hurdles working with Eden Housing; however, we feel that our leanings have not only allowed us to serve these families, but will also give us the opportunity to have a greater impact on their lives in the future. We were right on par with our expectations, and have barely exceeded the goal number of residents that we hoped to serve. Our staff did not do as well of a job measuring the outcome measures that we had originally listed, due to staff turnover. That being said, we are confident in the number of families we served with the parent education/support, healthy living advice, and connection to local services. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 5 We had a few challenges, but no problems or delays. This is a tough population to serve, and it's hard to get the parents' complete buy-in. To overcome this, we worked with Eden Housing to survey the parents and get a sense from them on what they really wanted/needed. This worked out well for us, but came much later in the year. This information will be invaluable in the upcoming fiscal year. Another challenge was turnover on our staff, as the Branch Operations Director and on-site recreation workers changed over halfway through the year. While this affected some of the record keeping of the outcome measures, we were still able to keep track of the number of residents we served, and know that we were very close to hitting all of the measures we listed. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 5 We work closely with Eden Housing, since this is their property. We also collaborated with Dublin Unified School District, CityServe of the Tri-Valley and the LDS Church. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 5 No we did not. That being said, we are using our successes from this past year to leverage additional funding from other partners. We believe that Kaiser will be supplementing our healthy living initiative at Emerald Vista with a $10,000 grant for the upcoming fiscal year. Page 99 of 1052013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Tri-Valley YMCA Allowing Kids with Special Needs to Thrive at Y Camp Name and Title of Person Completing Report: Report 4 Kenny Altenburg, Branch Operations Director Program Title: Report 4 Allowing Kids with Special Needs to Thrive at Y Camp Telephone: Report 4 925-263-4444 E-Mail: Report 4 kaltenburg@ymcaeastbay.org Please indicate if this report is for a Community Support Grant or Community Development Block Grant. (if same agency received funding from multiple funding sources, you must submit a separate report for each funding source).  Community Support Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6 through 11 and 21- 26 only. After that, you are through: you do not have to enter anything in the remaining question boxes. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - if you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. Housing In-Lieu Grant - If you checked here, please continue to answer questions 6-20 for quarterly reports. For the FINAL report, you must answer all questions. How has the PROJECT/PROGRAM addressed an unmet community need &amp; improved the qualify of life for Dublin residents? Report 4 The Tri-Valley YMCA was able to expand the services offered to include higher staffing ratios, more support for families and more intensive care management services. With these additional resources, our summer camp was truly a place where children with special needs could thrive. How many TOTAL participants were served by this PROJECT/PROGRAM THIS QUARTER? How many of those participants are Dublin residents? 200 200.00 Total Program Participants 75 75.00 Total Dublin residents 275.00 275.00 TOTAL Please evaluate the success of your PROJECT/PROGRAM. Were the goals outlined in the application met? Was the PROJECT/PROGRAM carried out efficiently? Please use the objectives identified in your application to discuss the sucess and impact. Report 4 We were able to meet our goals during the summer camp season. 1. We were able to provide an adult to child ratio of 1:8 or better serve our special needs population. 2. We were able to provide staff time to perform observations of children. 3. We implemented developmentally appropriate behavior plans for special needs children based on observations and staff feedback. Page 87 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp Were any Dublin grant funds expended for this project during this reporting period? Yes (already submitted invoice/s) Yes (but invoice/s not yet submitted)  No (no expenditures this period) Other: Please indicate how client data are reported for this project (please keep consistent for questions 11 through 13 and with your original application):  Persons Households Please complete the following table regarding the NUMBER OF UNDUPLICATED CLIENTS SERVED during this reporting period using the indicator chosen above (persons OR households): 60 60.00 A) Numeric GOAL stated in your Agreement for the number of Dublin clients to be served THIS FISCAL YEAR (unduplicated) 75 75.00 B) Number of NEW DUBLIN CLIENTS served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated) [NOTES: In the 1st quarter report, all unduplicated clients are considered to be new. In the subsequent 3 quarterly reports, include only new unduplicated clients who were not included in the previous report.] 200 200.00 C) Number of NEW CLIENTS AGENCY-WIDE served by this project during this reporting period (unduplicated; if project serves only Dublin clients, enter a zero) 335.00 335.00 TOTAL Please indicate the number of new, unduplicated DUBLIN clients served during this reporting period, as reported in 11B above, who met the following special categories (note that some clients may meet multiple categories and some not any): n/a 0.00 Low Income (50% to 80% Median) 0.00 Very Low Income (30% to 50% Median) 0.00 Extremely Low Income (<30% Median) 0.00 Seniors (62 and older) 0.00 Disabled 0.00 Female-Headed Households 0.00 0.00 TOTAL List the number of new, unduplicated Dublin clients your agency served during this reporting period in the following race/ethnicity categories. [Notes: Total must equal 11B. HUD considers &quot;Hispanic&quot; as an ethnicity and not a separate race.] n/a 0.00 White 0.00 White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American 0.00 Black/African American + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian 0.00 Asian + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native + HISPANIC 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.00 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White 0.00 American Indian/ Alaskan Native and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Asian and White 0.00 Asian and White + HISPANIC 0.00 Black/African American and White 0.00 Black/African American and White + HISPANIC 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American 0.00 American Indian/Alaskan Native and Black/African American + Page 88 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp HISPANIC 0.00 Other/Multi Racial 0.00 Other/Multi Racial + HISPANIC 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please define the primary UNIT OF SERVICE you use when tracking this project, submitting invoices, etc. (e.g., hours of counseling, medical visits, meals served, miles driven, etc.; should match the unit of service stated in your Agreement/Contract. Report 4 n/a Please complete the following table regarding the UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had TWO unit of service types, please define the second UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a second unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the second UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL If you had THREE unit of service types, please define the third UNIT OF SERVICE here (if you did not have a third unit of service, enter &#8220;N/A&#8221;): Report 4 N/A Please complete the following table regarding the third UNIT OF SERVICE listed above: n/a 0.00 Number of persons assisted with new access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted with improved access to a service. 0.00 Number of persons assisted who no longer have access to a substandard service. 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Please include any additional comments or clarifications here Report 4 n/a FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the original purpose for which the funds were granted. If applicable, explain why your agency did not spend the entire grant. Report 4 The purpose of this grant was to give our agency the ability to serve the needs of kids with special needs at our Y camp. All funds were spent. Page 89 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe the accomplishments of the program funded. Provide detail on how the program responded to needs within the community. Describe any new and creative methods the agency implemented to meet community needs. Report 4 Grant funds were used to hire professional, trained staff to work with the special needs children at camp. This additional staffing allowed for lower staff to camper ratios. In addition, we were able to implement developmentally appropriate curriculum modifications to meet the specific needs of the campers. Additional staff allowed for more intensive behavioral guidance for the special needs children which will included observations and behavior plans. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Does the agency feel this program was a success? How do you measure the success of the program? Did it meet or exceed the goals and outcomes described in the performance measures in the original application? If not, wh Report 4 Yes, the project was a success! Y-Camp provided children with a community of caring adults, who nurture experiential education that results in self-respect and appreciation for human value. We have seen a dramatic increase in the number of children with special needs attending the Y summer day camp program (Y-Camp). This grant funding allowed us to hire additional trained staff to ensure that those with special needs received the care and attention they require. All of our outcomes -- self-identity, self-worth, self-esteem, leadership, and self-respect -- built personal competencies in our campers. In terms of numbers, we exceeded our stated goal by 25% - this was VERY encouraging to us! FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Describe any problems/delays encountered with the project. How were they handled? What effects were there on project costs? Describe any changes that made the project successful or will make it successful in future yea Report 4 We did not run into any problems or delays. As we stated in the application, we are very well-equipped and trained to handle this project... and we did so! FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: List agencies you collaborated with on this project. Describe the nature of the collaboration. Report 4 We did not have any partnerships that were specifically involved in this project. FOR THE FINAL REPORT ONLY: Did you obtain other funding sources for this particular project? If so, list sources and amounts. Report 4 Yes we did. We received a grant from the City of Pleasanton in the amount of $6,500. We also conducted a significant amount of fundraising here at the Y to provide camp scholarships to some of these families that had children with special needs, and nowhere else for their kids to grow and thrive in the summer. Page 90 of 992013-2014 Community Grants Program 10/13/2014https://www.zoomgrants.com/customreport.asp