HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 144-21 Revising the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee for Future Development within the Eastern Dublin Area, Renaming the Program as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact FeReso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 1 of 12
RESOLUTION NO. 144 - 21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
REVISING THE EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN THE EASTERN DUBLIN AREA, RENAMING THE PROGRAM AS THE EASTERN
DUBLIN TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE, AND UPDATING THE CONSOLIDATED IMPACT
FEE ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES
SECTION I – RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has adopted Chapter 7.82 of the Dublin
Municipal Code which creates and establishes the authority for imposing and charging
transportation impact fees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”),
and corresponding Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment (“GPA”) in 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Specific Plan has been the subject of various amendments, and all
references herein to the “SP” are to the Specific Plan as amended to date; and
WHEREAS, the GPA outlined future land uses for lands within the City's eastern sphere of
influence, including approximately 13,906 dwelling units and 9.737 million square feet of
commercial, office, and industrial development; and
WHEREAS, the SP provides more specific detailed goals, policies, and action programs
for the lands covered by it; and
WHEREAS, the GPA and SP areas (“Eastern Dublin”) are included on the Land Use and
Boundary Map of the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Area, attached hereto as Exhibit
A; and
WHEREAS, a Program Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) was prepared for the GPA
and SP (SCH No. 91103604) and certified by the Council on May 10, 1993, by Reso lution No. 51-
93, and two Addenda dated May 4, 1993, and August 22, 1994 (“Addenda”), were prepared and
considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the GPA and SP provided for, and the EIR and Addenda analyzed, future
buildout of Eastern Dublin and identified freeway, freeway interchange and road improvements,
as well as transit improvements, pedestrian trails and bicycle paths necessary to implement the
SP; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a “Mitigation Monitoring Program: Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment” by Resolution No. 53-93 which requires development
within Eastern Dublin to pay its proportionate share of certain transportation improvements
necessary to mitigate impacts caused by development within Eastern Dublin; and
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 2 of 12
WHEREAS, a Program EIR (“the Transit Center EIR”) was prepared for the Dublin Transit
Center project, and certified by the Council by Resolution 215-02; and
WHEREAS, the Dublin Transit Center project area was added to the SP area and the
Transit Center EIR identified new improvements beyond those identified in the EIR; and
WHEREAS, supplemental CEQA documents, including supplemental environmental
impact reports, mitigated negative declarations, negative declarations and addenda have been
prepared for Eastern Dublin development since the EIR was certified in 1993 (collectively, the
“CEQA Documents”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan in 2013 which
identified new improvements beyond those identified in the EIR; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Dublin Crossing
Specific Plan (SCH No. 2012062009) and certified by the City Council on November 5, 2013, by
Resolution No. 186-13 and an Addendum was prepared and considered by the City Council by
Resolution No. 100-15 (collectively, the “Dublin Crossing Environmental Reports”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan for the
City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted the appropriate level of environmental review for the
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and adopted a Negative Declaration (“ND”) on October 7,
2014, by Resolution No. 169-14; and
WHEREAS, the GPA, SP, the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan and the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan (collectively, the “Plans”) provide specific detailed goals, policies, and
action programs for land and transportation for the Eastern Dublin area, and show future uses for
the Eastern Dublin area; and
WHEREAS, the EIR, Addenda, Transit Center EIR, Dublin Crossing Environmental
Reports, CEQA Documents, and ND (collectively, the “Environmental Documents”) considered
and describe certain transportation improvements necessary for implementation of the Plans; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Documents describe the impacts of contemplated future
development on existing public facilities in the areas of Eastern Dublin through the year 2040,
and contain analyses of the need for new public facilities and improvements to mitigate future
development within such areas of Eastern Dublin; and
WHEREAS, the EIR requires, and applicable Environmental Documents assumed, that
certain traffic and transportation improvements would be made and that development within
Eastern Dublin would pay its proportionate share of such improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1-95 on January 9, 1995,
establishing an “Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee” for development within Eastern Dublin; and
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 3 of 12
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the
City of Dublin by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., in a document dated November 1994 and
entitled “Traffic Impact Fee-Eastern Dublin” (hereinafter “Study”), which was attached as Exhibit B
to Resolution No. 1-95; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1-95 further relies upon a second report which was prepared
for the City of Dublin by Santina and Thompson in a document dated December 30, 1994,
entitled, “Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Study/Roadway Costs, Initial Level” (hereinafter “Cost
Report”), which was attached as Exhibit C to Resolution No. 1 -95; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-96 on April 9, 1996, revising the
fee established under Resolution No. 1-95; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 41-96 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared for the
City by TJKM (“1996 Study Update”) and cost estimates prepared by Santina and Thompson
(“1996 Cost Estimate Update”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 225-99 on December 7, 1999,
revising the fee established under Resolution No. 41-96; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 225-99 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared by the
Public Works Department (“1999 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update”, hereinafter “1999
Study Update”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 111-04 on June 15, 2004, revising
the fee established under Resolution No. 225-99; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 111-04 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared by the
Public Works Department (“2004 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update”, hereinafter “2004
Study Update”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 41-09 on April 7, 2009, revising the
fee established under Resolution No. 111-04; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 41-09 relies upon and incorporates a report prepared by the
Public Works Department (“2009 Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update”, hereinafter “2009
Study Update”); and
WHEREAS, testimony was received during the April 7, 2009 public hearing, requesting
that the City Council incorporate into the EDTIF a provision for reducing fees within the Eastern
Dublin Transit Center (Transit Center), as allowed under State Government Code Section
66005.1, on the basis that transit-oriented developments generate less traffic than conventional
development due to proximity of public transit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff at the April 7, 2009 public hearing to prepare a
work plan to develop a fee reduction study for the Transit Center, to determine if further revision
to the EDTIF is appropriate to reflect lower trip generation rates for development within the
Transit Center (“2009 Fee Reduction Study”); and
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 4 of 12
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 65-09 on May 19, 2009, approving
the work plan and directing Staff to proceed with the 2009 Fee Reduction Study; and
WHEREAS, the City's Public Works Department prepared a revised report, incorporating
the recommendations of the 2009 Fee Reduction Study, dated February 22, 2010, entitled, “2010
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Update” (hereinafter “2010 Study Update”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 40-10 on March 16, 2010, revising
the fee established under Resolution No. 41-09; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 40-10 relies upon and incorporates the 2010 Study Update;
and
WHEREAS, Section 8 of Resolution No. 40-10 provides that the City will periodically
review the fee and make revisions as appropriate; and
WHEREAS, in December 2021, a report was prepared by Fehr and Peers Transportation
Consultant titled, “Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update” (hereafter “2021 Study
Update”) which assessed updating the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee (hereinafter
“Fee”), and is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the 2021 Study Update includes and incorporates Tables 1 through 8 and
Appendices A through E; and
WHEREAS, the 2021 Study Update sets forth the relationship between future
development in Eastern Dublin, the needed improvements and facilities, the estimated cost of
those improvements and facilities, and demonstrates overall the appropriateness of modifying the
Fee in certain respects; and
WHEREAS, the 2021 Study Update, which includes updated cost estimates, together with
a copy of the Staff Report, proposed Resolution and all referenced documents were available for
public inspection and review for 10 days prior to this public hearing; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was provided as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the Fee is referenced in numerous documents, including the Master Fee
Schedule, and the Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines (hereinafter
“Administrative Guidelines”); and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to update the Fee to better implement the goals contained in
the Plans, including updating the fee methodology and the fee amount; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to update the Administrative Guidelines to better implement
the goals contained in the Plans, including clarifying the exceptions applicable to the various fees
and the procedures surrounding fee credits; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to re-title the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee as the
“Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee” to more accurately reflect the Fee’s scope and intent,
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 5 of 12
including its multi-modal focus, as well as correspondingly update all references to the Fee in the
Plans and other related documents.
SECTION II – FINDINGS
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby
finds as follows:
A. The purpose of Fee is to finance public improvements and facilities needed
to mitigate the transportation-related impacts caused by future development in Eastern Dublin.
The public improvements and facilities are listed in Table 1 of the 2021 Study Update and are
hereafter defined and referred to as “Improvements.” The Improvements are needed to
accommodate new development projected in Eastern Dublin and development in Eastern Dublin
will pay its fair and proportional share of such Improvements with the im plementation of this Fee.
B. The Fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the
Improvements.
C. After considering the Study, the Cost Report, the 1996 Study Update, the
1996 Cost Estimate Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, the 2009 Study
Update, the 2010 Study Update, the 2021 Study Update, Resolution No. 1 -95, Resolution 41-96,
Resolution 225-99, Resolution 111-04, Resolution 41-09, Resolution 40-10, the Staff Report, the
Plans, all EIRs and Environmental Documents, all correspondence received and the testimony
received at the noticed public hearing held on December 21, 2021 (the “Record”), the City
Council reapproves and readopts the Study, as revised by the 1996 Study Update, the 1999
Study Update, the 2004 Update Study, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study Update and the
2021 Study Update, and the Cost Estimate Report, as revised by the 1996 Cost Estimate, the
1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study Update, and
the 2021 Study Update, and incorporates each herein, and further finds that future development
in Eastern Dublin will generate the need for the Improvements and the Improvements are
consistent with the Plans.
D. The adoption of the Fee is within the scope of the Env ironmental Documents.
E. The Improvements were all identified in the Environmental Documents as
necessary to accommodate traffic from and/or to, to mitigate impacts of development in Eastern
Dublin. The impacts of such development, including the Improvements, were adequately
analyzed at a Program level in the Environmental Documents. There are no changes proposed to
the Improvements identified in the Environmental Documents , or to the surrounding
circumstances, as a result of this Fee, and no other new information of substantial importance so
as to require revisions to the Environmental Documents. No specific development is authorized
by the adoption of this Fee. The adoption of the Fee is not a project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Sections 15378 and 15061(b)(3), as it can be seen with certainty that there is no potential for the
Fee to have any significant effect on the environment. Specific Improvements will be required to
undergo the applicable environmental review when sufficient physical details are available to
permit meaningful CEQA review.
F. The record establishes:
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 6 of 12
1. That there continues to be a reasonable relationship between the need for
the Improvements and the impacts of the types of development for which the corresponding Fee
is charged in that new development in Eastern Dublin, both residential and non-residential, will
generate increased vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic which contributes to the need for the
Improvements; and
2. That there continues to be a reasonable relationship between the Fee’s use
(to pay for the construction and costs of the Improvements) and the type of development for
which the Fee is charged in that all development in Eastern Dublin, both residential and non-
residential, generates or contributes to the need for the Improvements; and
3. That there continues to be a reasonable relationship between the amount of
the Fee and the cost of the Improvements or portion thereof attributable to development in
Eastern Dublin in that the Fee is calculated based on the total number of net new PM peak hour
trips projected to be generated by specific types of land uses, the total cost to construct the
Improvements, and the percentage by which development within Eastern Dublin contributes to
the need for the Improvements; and
4. That the cost estimates set forth in the Study, as revised by the 1996 Study
Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study
Update, and the 2021 Study Update, and the Cost Estimate Report, as revised by the 1996 Cost
Estimate, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010
Study Update, and the 2021 Study Update are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the
Improvements, and the Fees expected to be generated by future development will not exceed the
projected costs of constructing the Improvements; and
5. That the method of allocation of the Fee to a particular development, set forth
in the Study, as revised in the 1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study
Update, the 2009 Study Update, the 2010 Study Update, and the 2021 Study Update bears a fair
and reasonable relationship to each development’s burden on, and benefit from, the
Improvements to be funded by the Fee, in that the Fee is calculated based on the total number of
net new PM peak hour trips each particular development will generate.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin DOES RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION III - RESOLUTION
1. Definitions
a. “Development” shall mean the construction, alteration or addition of any
building or structure within Eastern Dublin.
b. “Eastern Dublin” shall mean all territory depicted within the Eastern Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee Area on the Land Use and Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit
A.
c. “Improvements” shall include those public improvements and facilities as
listed in Table 1 of the 2021 Study Update. “Improvements” shall also include comparable
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 7 of 12
alternative improvements and facilities should later changes in projections of development in
the region necessitate construction of such alternative improvements and facilities; provided
that the City Council later determines (1) that there is a reasonable relationship between
development within Eastern Dublin and the need for the alternative improvements and facilities,
(2) that the alternative improvements and facilities are comparable to the improvements and
facilities in the 2021 Study Update and (3) that the revenue from the Fee will be used only to
pay Eastern Dublin development’s fair and proportionate share of the alternative improvements
and facilities.
d. “Single Family Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the
Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed
on property designated by the SP and GPA for up to 6 units per acre.
e. “Medium Density Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the
Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed
on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 6 to 14 units per acre.
f. “Medium/High Density Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined
in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be
constructed on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 14 to 25 units per acre.
g. “High Density Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the
Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin constructed or to be constructed
on property designated by the SP and GPA for over 25 units per acre.
h. “Accessory Dwelling Unit” shall mean a dwelling unit as defined in the
Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the City of Dublin that is issued a building permit as
an accessory dwelling unit pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.80 (Accessory Dwelling
Regulations) of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
i. Definitions of various non-residential land uses for the purpose of calculating
the Fee shall be as per the current General Plan or the Specific Plan, as applicable.
2. Impact Fee Retitled
The Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee shall henceforth be known as the “Eastern Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee.” All references to the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee in the Plans
and other official City documents are deemed to be references to the Eastern Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee, unless the context otherwise requires, and all future documents will
refer to the Fee by its new title.
3. Transportation Impact Fee Imposed
a. A Transportation Impact Fee (“Fee”) shall be charged and paid for each
residential unit within Eastern Dublin no later than the date of final inspection for the
unit, provided that the Fee shall be payable by the date that the building permit is
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 8 of 12
issued for any such unit from and after the date the City Council approves a Capital
Improvement Program for the Improvements.
b. A Fee shall be charged and paid for non-residential buildings or structures
within Eastern Dublin at the time of issuance of the building permit for such building or
structure, except where the building or structure will require a later stage of
discretionary approval by the City before it can be occupied, in which case, with the
approval of the Public Works Director, the Fee for that building or structure may be
deferred for payment to the date the City makes the last discretionary approval which
is required prior to occupancy.
c. The Fee includes the Freeway Interchange Fee and the Residential BART
Garage Fee. The calculations of each fee component are described in the 2021 Study
Update. The Residential BART Garage Fee (formerly known as Section II Residential
BART Parking Fee) and Freeway Interchange Fee are separate fees but both,
together with the Transportation Impact Fee, are collectively referred to as the “Fee.”
4. Amount of Fee
a. The amount of the Fee shall be as set forth in the Eastern Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated
by reference.
b. For any non-residential buildings or structures not reflected in Exhibit C, the
Fee per unit shall be calculated as follows.
i. The Fee per unit shall be calculated by multiplying $13,751 (the
Maximum Fee amount) by the PM Peak Hour Trip rate for that specific
land use category, as set forth in the ITE Trip Generation Manual,
10th Edition. The Public Works Director shall determine the
applicable land use category.
ii. A pass-by percentage reduction may be applicable per the guidance
presented in ITE Trip Generation publications. The Public Works
Director shall have sole discretion in determining whether to approve
any pass-by percentage reduction.
5. Minimum Cash Payment
The minimum cash payment for the Fee shall be 11% of the total Fee due. Developers
may utilize credits for the remainder of the Fee, if authorized by the Administrative Guidelines.
6. Exemptions from Fee
In addition to exemptions authorized by the Administrative Guidelines, the following types
of development will be exempt from the Fee:
a. Non-Residential Replacement or Reconstruction: Any replacement or
reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure that has been destroyed or
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 9 of 12
demolished is exempt from payment of the Fee, provided that the use of the new or
reconstructed building would not increase the trips over those from the existing non -
residential structure, calculated as provided in Exhibit C.
b. Non-Residential Replacement or Reconstruction (Partial Exemption): Any
replacement or reconstruction of an existing non-residential structure that has been
destroyed or demolished is entitled to a partial exemption from the Fee if the use of
the new or reconstructed building would increase the trips over those from the ex isting
non-residential structure calculated as provided in Exhibit C. The partial exemption
from the Fee shall be equal to the square footage of the existing non-residential
structure that was destroyed or demolished multiplied by the number of trips shown on
Exhibit C for its previous use, which total is then subtracted as a “Partial Fee
Exemption” from the fees owed based on the use and square footage of the new or
reconstructed building as provided in Exhibit C. The new development shall not
accrue any credit or reimbursement rights in the event that the fee for the new or
reconstructed building is less than the “Partial Fee Exemption” as calculated above.
c. Non-Residential Additions More Than 500 Square Feet (Partial Exemption:
Any addition of 500 square feet or more to an existing non -residential building or
structure is entitled to a partial exemption from payment of the Fee. The partial
exemption from the Fee shall be equal to the square footage of the existing non -
residential building or structure calculated as provided in Exhibit C.
7. Use of Revenues
a. The revenues raised by payment of the Fee shall continue to be placed in the
Traffic Impact Fee Fund, which will henceforth be known as the Eastern Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee Fund (“Fund”). The revenues (and interest) shall be used
for the following purposes:
i. To pay for design, engineering, right-of-way acquisition and
constructions of the Improvements and reasonable costs of outside
consultant studies related thereto;
ii. To reimburse the City for Improvements constructed by the City with
funds from other sources including funds from other public entities,
unless the City funds were obtained from grants or gifts intended by
the grantor to be used for traffic improvements;
iii. To reimburse developers and/or public agencies who have
constructed Improvements; and
iv. To pay for and/or reimburse costs of program development and
ongoing administration of the Fee program.
b. Fees in these Fund accounts shall be expended only for the Improvements
and only for the purpose for which the Fee was collected.
8. Standards
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 10 of 12
The standards upon which the needs for the Improvements are based are the standards of
the City of Dublin, including the standards contained in the Plans, and the Environmental
Documents.
9. No Existing Deficiencies
The City Council determines that there are no existing deficiencies within Eastern Dublin
and that the need for the Improvements in the 2021 Study Update is generated entirely by new
development within Eastern Dublin, and, therefore, the 2021 Study Update has determined the
proportionate share of the cost of the Improvements for which development within Eastern Dublin
is responsible.
10. Periodic Review
a. During each fiscal year, the City Manager shall continue to prepare a report
for the City Council, pursuant to Government Code Section 66006.
b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66002, the City Council shall also
review, as part of any adopted Capital Improvement Program each year, the
approximate location, size, time of availability and estimates of cost for all
Improvements to be financed with the Fee. The estimated costs shall be adjusted in
accordance with appropriate indices of inflation. The City Council shall make findings
identifying the purpose to which the existing Fee balances are to be put and
demonstrating a reasonable relationship between the Fee and the purpose for which it
is charged.
11. Subsequent Analysis of the Fee
The Fee established herein is adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on
the Record identified above. The City will continue to conduct further study and analysis to
determine whether the Fee should be revised. When additional information is available, the City
Council shall review the Fee to determine that the amounts are reasonably related to the impa cts
of development within Eastern Dublin. The City Council may revise the Fee to incorporate the
findings and conclusions of further studies and any standards in the Plans, as well as increases
due to construction costs and land values. The City will evaluate land values through an appraisal
approximately every three (3) years, as determined by the Public Works Director.
12. Automatic Increases in Fee
The purpose of this section is to provide for an automatic annual adjustment to the Fee in
years when the City Council does not revise the Fee pursuant to Section 11 above. The City
Manager shall adjust the Fee automatically, effective July 1, 2022, and each July 1 thereafter, as
follows:
a. The costs of construction of the Improvements (which account for 80% of the
improvement cost) shall be increased/decreased each July 1st by the annual
percentage increase/decrease in the Engineering News Record's Construction Cost
Index for the San Francisco Bay Area for the preceding month of December over the
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 11 of 12
same Construction Cost Index for the month of December of the prior year. The City
Manager may round the Fee adjustment to whole dollars.
b. The Land Cost per acre for the Improvements shall be increased/decreased
annually by the percentage increase/decrease between the land cost per acre in the
most recent land appraisal (prepared for the City for purposes of adjusting the Fee)
over the land cost per acre in the immediately preceding appraisal (prepared for the
City for purposes of adjusting the Fee and using the same methodology), calculated
as an annual increase/decrease. For example, if the appraised land value in Year One
is $10/acre and in Year Two is $11/acre, that is an annual increase of 10% which will
result in a yearly increase of 10%, until the Fee is revised by the Council pursuant to
Section 11 above. The City Manager may round the Fee adjustment to whole dollars.
The “land” comprises 20% of the improvement costs financed by the fees.
13. Area of Benefit Fee
A portion of the Fee shall also be deemed to be an Area of Benefit Fee adopted pursuant
to Dublin Municipal Code Section 9.16.090. This is the portion of the Fee designated for the
construction of those Improvements that are major thoroughfares and bridges. These
Improvements and the estimated cost of such improvements are listed on Exhibit D attached
hereto. The “Area of Benefit” is Eastern Dublin as defined herein. The fee shall be apportioned
over the Area of Benefit in the same manner set forth in Section 4 of this Resolution and in the
Study, 1996 Study Update, the 1999 Study Update, the 2004 Study Update, and the 2009 Study
Update, with the amount to be assessed for residential and non-residential as shown on Exhibit
D. The Area of Benefit Fee shall be deposited into the Fund into separate accounts established
for each of the improvements identified in Exhibit D.
14. Administrative Guidelines
The City Council hereby adopts the revised Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative
Guidelines attached hereto as Exhibit E.
15. Effective Date
This Resolution shall become effective immediately. The alterations to the Fee provided in
this Resolution shall be effective 60 days from the effective date of the Resolution and shall
supersede the Fee established by Resolution No. 40-10. The Area of Benefit Fee established in
Section 13 of this Resolution shall be effective only if the Fee provided in Sections 3 and 4 hereof
is declared invalid for any reason.
16. Severability
Each component of the Fee, including the Freeway Interchange Fee and the Residential
BART Garage Fee, and each and every improvement financed by the Fee or any of the
component fees, and all portions of this Resolution are severable. Should any individual
component fee of the Fee or other provision of this Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and
unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be and continue to be fully effective, and the Fee
shall be fully effective except as to that portion that has been judged to be invalid.
Reso. No. 144-21, Item 6.1, Adopted 12/21/2021 Page 12 of 12
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of December 2021 by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Hu, Josey, Kumagai, McCorriston and Mayor Hernandez
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
City Clerk
Attachment 2 – Exhibit A to the Resolution
Boundary Map of the EDTIF Area
Eastern Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee Update:
Final Report
Prepared for:
City of Dublin
December 2021
WC16-3332
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1
2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS .............................................................................................. 2
Project Identification .......................................................................................................................................................... 2
Cost Estimates ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2
3. GROWTH PROJECTIONS .................................................................................................................. 6
Land Use Growth.................................................................................................................................................................. 6
Trip Generation ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6
4. NEXUS ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................................. 9
Existing Deficiencies ........................................................................................................................................................... 9
EDTIF Project Cost Responsibility ............................................................................................................................... 11
Fee Calculations ................................................................................................................................................................. 14
EDTIF Fee Calculations ........................................................................................................................................... 15
Freeway Interchange Fee Calculations ............................................................................................................. 18
Residential BART Garage Fee Calculations ..................................................................................................... 18
5. SUMMARY OF REQUIRED PROGRAM ELEMENTS ....................................................................... 20
Appendices
Appendix A: Current EDTIF Projects
Appendix B: Detailed Information on Updated EDTIF Projects
Appendix C: Growth Projections
Appendix D: Level of Service Criteria
Appendix E: EDTIF Fee Amounts by Land Use Category
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
List of Figures
Figure 1 EDTIF Project Locations ............................................................................................................................................. 3
List of Tables
Table 1: Updated EDTIF Projects and Estimated Cost ............................................................................................................ 4
Table 2: East Dublin Trip Generation (New Future Development) .................................................................................. 8
Table 3: Existing Levels Of Service ................................................................................................................................................. 9
Table 4: Updated EDTIF Projects and Total Amount Per Project .................................................................................. 12
Table 5: EDTIF Calculation .............................................................................................................................................................. 16
Table 6: Fee Amounts For Typical Land Use Categories .................................................................................................... 17
Table 7: Summary of Updated Fees ........................................................................................................................................... 19
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
1
1. INTRODUCTION
On January 9, 1995, the Dublin City Council adopted (by Resolution #1-95) an Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact
Fee program, intended to generate funds to allow the City of Dublin to implement a number of important
transportation investments planned in the eastern Dublin area, which generally covers the area from
Dougherty Road to the easterly city limits (see Figure 1 for the boundaries of the Eastern Dublin Traffic
Impact Fee program). The program has been updated several times, most recently by Council Resolution
#40-10 on March 16, 2010. The funds generated have been used to construct several improvements to
transportation infrastructure in the affected area.
The City now wishes to update the program to account for changes pursuant to the City’s most recent
General Plan, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, adoption of the 2014 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and
Complete Streets Policy, and more current information about proposed developments in the eastern Dublin
area. The City also determined the fee program should be renamed to better reflect the program’s scope
and intent; it will now be known as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee (EDTIF). This report
includes updating the list of capital improvement projects, the growth projections in the geographic area
covered by the EDTIF, and the fee calculations. This report describes each of these steps and the approach
to establishing the “nexus” or relationship between the impacts of new development in the EDTIF area and
the fees that could justifiably be charged to construct transportation improvements to serve
new development.
Impact fees are established under a state law known as AB 1600, the Mitigation Fee Act. Fees charged
pursuant to this legislation are used to build capital facilities needed to serve the demands generated by
new development. Fees are not used to correct existing deficiencies, but rather are intended to address
future needs. There must be a demonstrated relationship, or “nexus,” between the amount of the fee, the
cost of the facilities, and the types of development on which the fee is imposed. This report presents the
information needed to demonstrate those relationships and is commonly called a nexus study.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
2
2. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
City staff provided an updated list of capital improvement projects in the area covered by the EDTIF
program. Most of these projects are continuations of capital improvements that have already been part of
the EDTIF program; in some cases, the components of a project have been updated to reflect the most
recent information about development patterns in the area as well as the policy direction set in the City’s
General Plan and other planning documents. Overall, the purpose of the projects remains the same as when
the EDTIF was first adopted. These projects are intended to accommodate travelers more efficiently through
adding travel lanes and turn lanes, as well as adding or upgrading sidewalks, and adding or modifying traffic
signals. For reference, the projects that have historically been included in the current EDTIF program are
shown in Appendix A, along with the current status of each project and whether it is being carried forward
into the updated EDTIF. Table 1 displays the updated EDTIF project list, and the project locations are shown
in Figure 1.
COST ESTIMATES
For the purposes of the EDTIF, it is necessary to have an estimate of the cost to implement each of the
capital improvement projects on the EDTIF project list. Cost estimates were developed for the EDTIF
projects by the City. For the three interchange projects, the cost estimates were taken from a prior EDTIF
analysis in 2010 and were escalated to 2021 dollars using cost escalation factors approved by the City.
Consideration was given to whether right-of-way would need to be acquired as part of each project.
Consistent with the practice typically used in the EDTIF, in cases where there is a fronting developer who
would be required to dedicate right-of-way, no acquisition cost was included in the cost estimate. The
estimated cost of each project is shown on Table 1.
More detailed information about the capital improvement projects is provided in Appendix B, including a
conceptual layout of each project and documentation of the cost estimates described above. Please note
that the conceptual layouts shown in the appendix are for illustrative purposes; details of each project may
change as more refined design work is completed.
#
"
"
#
"
#
"
"k
§¨¦580
§¨¦680
Fallon Rd
G le a s o n D r
Fallon RdScarlett Dr Dublin BlvdDougherty RdVillage PkwyOwens Dr
Central PkwyAmador Valley BlvdHacienda DrRosewood DrHo
p
y
a
r
d
Rd Arnold RdTassajara RdDublin Blvd
C:\GIS\MXD\figX_EastDublinImpactFee_100521.mxdEast Dublin Transpor tation Impact Fee Project LocationsFigure 1
5
Project Location s
5
E
B
C G
Dublin Transit Center Area
!!!!!East Dublin TIF AreaD
A G
IF
Tassajara Rd
Tassajara Rd / I-580 Interchange
Fallon Rd
Scarlett DrH
F
Dublin Blvd
Hacienda Dr / I-580 Interchange
Interchange Improvements I Fallon Rd / 580 Interchange
H
C Central Pkwy
D
A
Project Improvements
New Signal
Roadway Improvements B
Gleason DrE
J
J Hacienda Dr
K
K Iron Horse Trail CrossingNew Bike / Ped Bridgek
L
Class I Trail
L Altamirano Class I Trail
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
4
TABLE 1: UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS AND ESTIMATED COST
Number Project Location Description Estimated Cost
A Dublin Boulevard
Roadway improvements, including frontage
improvements, signal modifications, widening and
roadway extension, from Sierra Court to Dougherty
Road and from Iron Horse Parkway to Airway
Boulevard (Segments: 6, 8A, 9, 10, 11)
$112,433,000
B Hacienda/I-580
Interchange
Reconstruct overcrossing with additional NB lane;
widen EB off-ramp with third left-turn lane; modify WB
loop on-ramp; and widen WB off-ramp with third left-
turn lane
$14,445,000
C Central Parkway
Sidewalks, curb ramps, new signal (at Park Place), turn
lanes, from Arnold Road to Hacienda Drive (Segments:
16A, 17, 18)
$2,820,000
D Gleason Drive
New signal and turn lanes at Gleason Drive and Arnold
Road; new sidewalks and striping from Tassajara Road
to Fallon Road (Segments: 19, 20)
$1,234,000
E Tassajara Road
Widening, turn lanes, sidewalks, curb ramps, new
signals from I-580 to County line (Segments: 22, 22A,
23, 24)
$32,399,000
F Tassajara/I-580
Interchange
Widen eastbound off-ramp approach at Tassajara
Road to provide fifth lane $4,308,000
G Fallon Road Widening, turn lanes, sidewalks, new signals between
I-580 and Gleason Drive (Segments: 26A, 27) $8,166,000
H Scarlett Drive
New 4 lane roadway with median from Houston Drive
to Dublin Boulevard, and raised medians, curb ramps
and new traffic signals from Dougherty Road to
Houston Place (Segment: 21)
$9,049,000
I Fallon/I-580 Interchange
Reconstruct overcrossing with four lanes in each
direction; reconstruct SB to EB loop on-ramp; widen EB
off-ramp with two exit lanes with two left turn and two
right tum lanes; widen EB on-ramp; widen WB off-
ramp with two left turn and two right turn lanes; and
widen WB on-ramp.
$4,307,000
J Hacienda Drive New turn lanes, restriping between Dublin Boulevard
and Gleason Drive (Segment: 14) $3,279,000
K Iron Horse Trail Crossing New bike/pedestrian bridge for Iron Horse Trail across
Dublin Boulevard $11,600,000
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
5
L Altamirano Avenue Class
I Trail
New Class I trail along Altamirano Avenue, north of I-
580 between Iron Horse Trail and Hacienda Drive $1,552,000
M Ongoing Traffic Signal
Upgrades
Signal timing modifications and signal systems
upgrades associated with accommodating traffic from
new development ($100,000 per year for 5 years)
$500,000
N Future Nexus Report
Update
Update EDTIF nexus study to reflect updated growth
projections, project definitions, and costs $150,000
O Update Eastern Dublin
Travel Demand Model
Update City of Dublin travel demand model for
changing growth projections and to keep it up-to-date
for applications in future East Dublin planning studies
$300,000
Total Estimated Cost $206,542,000
Notes: See Appendix B for further description of the segments shown for most projects.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
6
3. GROWTH PROJECTIONS
LAND USE GROWTH
An important step in quantifying the nexus relationship is to determine the amount of new development
anticipated in the planning horizon of the study, which is the year 2040. The City has recently completed
an update of the City’s travel demand model, including updates of the current and future land use
throughout the City. The base year of the model is now 2020 and the horizon year is 2040, and the model’s
land use inputs reflect the City’s General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. See Appendix C for a
map showing the Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) from the City model that represent the EDTIF area, as well
as a table showing the amount of existing and expected future development in the area. As shown in the
appendix materials, a substantial amount of new development is anticipated; the number of jobs in this area
could increase by about 20,000 (more than double when compared to current conditions), and the number
of housing units could increase by approximately 1,700 (a 15% increase from base year to future year).
It is also important to note that, as shown in Figure C-1 in Appendix C, the boundary of the EDTIF area is
undergoing a minor change. As had been intended when the Boulevard project (then Dublin Crossing) was
approved in 2013, the small parcel in the northwest quadrant of the Dublin Boulevard/Arnold Road
intersection is now a part of the Boulevard development and will no longer be part of the EDTIF area.
TRIP GENERATION
Once the land use assumptions were established, the trip generation associated with those land uses was
calculated. As a first step, the employment numbers applied in the City of Dublin travel model were
converted into building square footages, since the fees for non-residential uses will typically be applied on
the basis of building area. Consideration was also given to whether it might be appropriate to apply any
trip reduction factors to account for mixed-use development, particularly in areas that are well-served by
high-frequency transit. The EDTIF area does contain the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station, which is located
at the western edge of the EDTIF area. The Dublin Transit Center development is the only portion of the
new development anticipated in the EDTIF area that will be within easy walking distance of the BART station.
To estimate the vehicular trip generation of the new development for all areas except the Dublin Transit
Center, the average rates presented in the ITE Trip Generation manual (10th Edition) were applied to the
relevant land use categories. For the Dublin Transit Center, Fehr and Peers’ MXD+ tool was applied to
estimate the trip generation. This tool was selected because the traditional ITE Trip Generation
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
7
methodologies are primarily based on data collected at single-use, freestanding sites located in suburban
areas with very little accessibility by transit, bicycling, or walking. These defining characteristics limit the
data’s applicability to mixed-use or multi-use development projects in more pedestrian-friendly and transit-
accessible places, such as the Dublin Transit Center.
The development of the MXD+ technique began in response to the limitations in the ITE Trip Generation
methodology. With the goal of providing a straightforward and empirically validated method of estimating
vehicle trip generation at mixed-use developments, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
sponsored a national study of the trip generation characteristics of mixed-use sites. Travel survey data was
gathered from 239 mixed-use developments (called MXDs) in six major metropolitan regions and correlated
with the characteristics of the sites and their surroundings. The findings indicated that the amount of traffic
generated by each site is affected by a wide variety of factors including the mix of jobs and residents at the
site, the overall size and density of the development, the availability of convenient internal connections for
walking or driving between nearby uses, the availability of transit service to the site, and the surrounding
trip destinations within the immediate area. None of these factors is explicitly accounted for in the
traditional application of the ITE Trip Generation manual method.
As part of the study, these characteristics were related statistically to trip behavior observed at the
development sites using statistical techniques. These statistical relationships produced equations, known as
the EPA MXD model, that predict how the trip generation from a particular mixed-use site would be reduced
as compared to the traditional ITE methods. Applying these vehicle trip reduction percentages to the “raw
trips” predicted by the ITE methods produces an estimate for the number of vehicle trips traveling in or out
of a site. Table 2 shows the results of the trip generation estimation for the new development in the EDTIF
area, including the trip reduction estimated for the Dublin Transit Center (DTC) as a result of the application
of the MXD+ tool.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
8
TABLE 2: EAST DUBLIN TRIP GENERATION (NEW FUTURE DEVELOPMENT)
ITE Land Use Quantity Daily
Total
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Housing
(including Townhomes)
1,452
Dwelling Units 13,707 269 806 1,074 906 531 1,437
Apartments 283 Dwelling
Units 2,072 30 100 130 84 74 158
Shopping Center (Adj
Streets, 7-9A, 4-6P)
1822.5 KSF
leasable area 44,720 690 423 1,114 2,166 2,347 4,513
General Office Building
(Pk Hr, AM & PM)
5144.3 KSF
gross floor
area
50,106 5,132 835 5,967 947 4,969 5,916
Manufacturing (Adj
Streets, 7-9A, 4-6P)
897.3 KSF
Gross Floor
Area
3,527 428 128 556 186 415 601
114,130 6,549 2,293 8,842 4,289 8,336 12,625
Less Trip Reduction for DTC Area -3,010 -568 -489
Total Net New Vehicle Trips 111,120 8,274 12,136
Notes: KSF = Thousand Square Feet.
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021.
Note that PM peak hour trips are the focus of this EDTIF study. This is a change from the current application
of the fee program, which uses daily trips as the basis for the fee calculations. Most transportation facilities
are designed to accommodate usage during peak periods, and the PM peak is the time period during which
all of the land uses in the EDTIF area will be active, so it is the time period that will best capture the full
range of travel effects caused by the anticipated future development.
For the purposes of the EDTIF program, which focuses on the impacts of new development, the most
important piece of information is the estimated growth in trips between existing and future conditions. As
shown in Table 2, the total number of net new PM peak hour trips will be used to calculate the EDTIF fee
per new peak hour trip.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
9
4. NEXUS ANALYSIS
EXISTING DEFICIENCIES
An important part of a nexus analysis is to establish whether the transportation facilities that will be
addressed by the projects in the fee program are currently deficient. If there are existing deficiencies at any
of those locations, then an adjustment should be made in the fee calculations to ensure new development
pays its fair share and is not being charged to correct an existing problem.
The most recent study that comprehensively addresses the Eastern Dublin area is the transportation impact
analysis conducted for the Dublin Kaiser Medical Center. The Dublin Kaiser study collected traffic count data
and analyzed 22 intersections throughout the Eastern Dublin area located on or near one of the capital
improvement projects proposed as part of the EDTIF. The City of Dublin uses vehicle Level of Service (LOS)
as a performance measure, with a standard of LOS D or better at all intersections outside of the downtown
area. Table 3 summarizes the current operations at the 22 intersections analyzed in the Dublin Kaiser study.
(For reference, the Level of Service criteria for signalized intersections from the 2000 Highway Capacity
Manual is included in Appendix D.) As shown, all of the intersections are reported as operating at LOS D
or better in both the AM and PM peak hours; this level of operation meets the City’s standards, thus
indicating these locations are not currently deficient. Because there are no existing deficiencies, it is
reasonable to carry forward all of the cost of the future improvements into the next stage of the
fee calculations.
TABLE 3: EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE
Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour
Existing
Conditions
(sec/veh)1
LOS2,3
1. Dublin Blvd/Scarlett Dr Signalized AM 7.0 A
PM 10.0 A
2. Central Pkwy/Arnold Rd Signalized AM 7.3 A
PM 6.3 A
3. Dublin Blvd/Arnold Rd Signalized AM 20.4 C
PM 28.1 C
4. Dublin Blvd/Hacienda Dr Signalized AM 39.6 D
PM 39.6 D
5. I-580 WB Ramps/Hacienda Dr Signalized AM 6.4 A
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
10
TABLE 3: EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE
Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour
Existing
Conditions
(sec/veh)1
LOS2,3
PM 6.4 A
6. I-580 EB Ramps/Hacienda Dr Signalized AM 11.2 B
PM 11.2 B
7. Fallon Rd/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 20.2 C
PM 20.2 C
8. Gleason Dr/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 28.4 C
PM 23.2 C
9. Central Pkwy/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 28.1 C
PM 28.1 C
10. Dublin Blvd/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 39.2 D
PM 39.2 D
11. I-580 WB Ramps/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 6.5 A
PM 6.5 A
12. I-580 EB Ramps/Tassajara Rd Signalized AM 29.9 C
PM 29.9 C
13. Dublin Blvd/Brannigan St Signalized AM 14.4 B
PM 14.4 B
14. Dublin Blvd/Carnmore Pl Signalized AM 4.3 A
PM 4.3 A
15. Dublin Blvd/Keegan St Signalized AM 10.6 B
PM 10.6 B
16. Dublin Blvd/Lockhart St Signalized AM 8.6 A
PM 8.6 A
17. Dublin Blvd/Fallon Gateway Signalized AM 4.3 A
PM 4.3 A
18. Central Pkwy/Fallon Rd Signalized AM 13.0 B
PM 13.0 B
19. Dublin Blvd/Fallon Rd Signalized AM 18.5 B
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
11
TABLE 3: EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE
Intersection Traffic Control Peak Hour
Existing
Conditions
(sec/veh)1
LOS2,3
PM 18.5 B
20. Fallon Gateway/Fallon Rd Signalized AM 5.3 A
PM 5.3 A
21. I-580 WB Ramps/Fallon Rd/El Charro Rd Signalized AM 8.6 A
PM 8.6 A
22. I-580 EB Ramps/Fallon Rd/El Charro Rd Signalized AM 8.2 A
PM 8.2 A
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2017
Notes:
1 Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections.
2 LOS calculations performed using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method.
3 Unacceptable seconds of delay per vehicle and LOS highlighted in bold.
EDTIF PROJECT COST RESPONSIBILITY
As described earlier, the land use projections for the year 2040 were used in the Dublin travel demand
model (Model)and the Model was applied to generate estimates of travel patterns and volumes in the
future. A common modeling technique called a select zone analysis was applied within the Model to identify
the amount of future traffic volume on each roadway link that is generated by land uses in the EDTIF area.
On each Model link that represents the location of an EDTIF project, the future traffic volume attributable
to the EDTIF area was compared to the overall future traffic volume, thereby calculating the share of the
usage of that link that can be attributed to the land uses in the EDTIF area. These usage percentages are
shown in Table 4.
One project (Project L, the Altamirano Avenue Class I Trail) involves an extension of an off-street trail, which
is a type of project that cannot be reflected in the Model so the usage percentage must be calculated
differently. This project will serve bicycle and pedestrian travel as an extension of current bicycle/pedestrian
facilities and will provide non-vehicular travel options both to existing and new residents and workers. The
percentage of the project cost to be included in the EDTIF program has thus been calculated as the
proportion of future population and employment added by the new development that will be subject to
the fee. As calculated from the data presented in Table C-1 in Appendix C, the sum of the additional
households plus employment expected in the EDTIF area (1,735 households plus 20,423 jobs) will constitute
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
12
about 47% of the total future households plus employment in the Eastern Dublin area, so the usage
percentage for this project has been set at 47%.
The percentages described above were applied to the cost of each EDTIF infrastructure project, and the
resulting amount represents the portion of the cost of each project that will be included in the EDTIF
program. As shown in Table 4, the EDTIF program would capture about 61% of the total project costs, while
other funding sources (such as grants, County Measure BB funds, or other sources) would be needed to
cover the remainder. This means that about 61% of the usage of these facilities comes from current and
future residents and employees in the EDTIF area, while the remainder comes from travelers who use these
facilities, but do not live or work in the EDTIF area.
It should be noted that the previous EDTIF classified the capital improvement projects as Section I or Section
II improvements and established a fee for each category. Section I improvements were those located inside
the EDTIF area, while Section II improvements were located outside the area. Because of the application of
the select zone modeling technique described above and its ability to capture Eastern Dublin’s share of
usage on any facility regardless of the facility’s location, it is no longer necessary to make that distinction.
The Model results show the percentage of usage on each facility coming from the land uses in the EDTIF
area, thereby allowing for the fee to be calculated based directly on the amount of EDTIF usage of each
facility, regardless of the facility’s location. The distinction is being eliminated. This change has implications
for existing fee credits, which were issued as either Section I or Section II fee credits. Simultaneously with
the EDTIF update, the City intends to update its Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines to
eliminate the provision stating that Section I and Section II fee credits can only be used to offset fees in
those same categories.
TABLE 4: UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS AND TOTAL AMOUNT PER PROJECT
Project Project Location Description Estimated
Cost
% from
EDTIF
Area
EDTIF
Amount
A Dublin Boulevard
Roadway improvements, including
frontage improvements, signal
modifications, widening and roadway
extension, from Sierra Court to
Dougherty Road and from Iron Horse
Parkway to Airway Boulevard
(Segments: 6, 8A, 9, 10, 11)
$112,433,000 61% $68,076,800
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
13
TABLE 4: UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS AND TOTAL AMOUNT PER PROJECT
Project Project Location Description Estimated
Cost
% from
EDTIF
Area
EDTIF
Amount
B Hacienda/I-580
Interchange
Reconstruct overcrossing with
additional NB lane; widen EB off-ramp
with third left-turn lane; modify WB
loop on-ramp; and widen WB off-ramp
with third left-turn lane
$14,445,000 56% $8,080,100
C Central Parkway
Sidewalks, curb ramps, new signal (at
Sybase Drive), turn lanes, from Arnold
Road to Hacienda Drive (Segments:
16A, 17, 18)
$2,820,000 90% $2,543,600
D Gleason Drive
New signal and turn lanes at Gleason
and Arnold; new sidewalks and striping
from Tassajara to Fallon (Segments: 19,
20)
$1,234,000 90% $1,113,000
E Tassajara Road
Widening, turn lanes, sidewalks, curb
ramps, new signals from I-580 to
County line (Segments: 22, 22A, 23, 24)
$32,399,000 85% $27,569,800
F Tassajara/I-580
Interchange
Widen eastbound off-ramp approach at
Tassajara Road to provide fifth lane $4,308,000 70% $3,031,500
G Fallon Road
Widening, turn lanes, sidewalks, new
signals between I-580 and Gleason
Drive (Segments: 26A, 27)
$8,166,000 69% $5,632,500
H Scarlett Drive
New 4 lane roadway with median from
Houston Dr to Dublin Blvd, and raised
medians, curb ramps and new traffic
signals from Dougherty to Houston
(Segment: 21)
$9,049,000 39% $3,570,300
I Fallon/I-580
Interchange
Reconstruct overcrossing with four
lanes in each direction; reconstruct SB
to EB loop on-ramp; widen EB off-ramp
with two exit lanes with two left turn
and two right tum lanes; widen EB on-
ramp; widen WB off-ramp with two left
turn and two right turn lanes; and
widen WB on-ramp.
$4,307,000 40% $1,730,700
J Hacienda Drive
New turn lanes, restriping between
Dublin Blvd and Gleason Drive
(Segment: 14)
$3,279,000 92% $3,001,400
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
14
TABLE 4: UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS AND TOTAL AMOUNT PER PROJECT
Project Project Location Description Estimated
Cost
% from
EDTIF
Area
EDTIF
Amount
K Iron Horse Trail
Crossing
New bike/pedestrian bridge for Iron
Horse Trail across Dublin Boulevard;
(the EDTIF amount is the local match
amount likely necessary to obtain
outside funding)
$11,600,000 4% $500,000
L
Altamirano
Avenue Class I
Trail
New Class I trail along Altamirano
Avenue, north of I-580 between Iron
Horse Trail and Hacienda Drive
$1,552,000 47% $729,400
M Ongoing Traffic
Signal Upgrades
Signal timing modifications and signal
systems upgrades associated with
accommodating traffic from new
development ($100,000 per year for 5
years)
$500,000 100% $500,000
N Future Nexus
Report Update
Update EDTIF nexus study to reflect
updated growth projections, project
definitions and costs
$150,000 100% $150,000
O
Update Eastern
Dublin Travel
Demand Model
Update City of Dublin travel demand
model to keep it up-to-date for
applications in future East Dublin
planning studies
$300,000 100% $300,000
Totals $206,542,000 61% $126,529,100
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021.
FEE CALCULATIONS
There are three different transportation fee components charged within the Eastern Dublin area. The basic
EDTIF fee is the primary fee program and is charged to new development of all types located in the Eastern
Dublin area to address the wide range of transportation improvements needed to support future
development in the area as described above. In addition, there is a Freeway Interchange Fee that is focused
on reimbursing the City of Pleasanton for improvements previously constructed at two interchanges along
I-580, and there is a BART Garage Fee that is charged only in a portion of the Eastern Dublin area for the
purpose of reimbursing Alameda County for previous investments in the parking garage at the East
Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. The calculations of each fee component are described below.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
15
EDTIF FEE CALCULATIONS
The calculation of the basic EDTIF fee was completed based on the figures described above. Starting from
the approximately $126 million of project costs eligible to be included in the EDTIF program, we add the
outstanding fee credits currently carried by the EDTIF program and subtract the current (as of June 30, 2021)
EDTIF fund balance, and the result is divided by the number of net new PM peak hour vehicle trips estimated
to be generated by new development in the EDTIF area. Table 5 shows the results of the calculation.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
16
TABLE 5: EDTIF CALCULATION
Calculation Value
Total Eligible Project Cost in EDTIF Program $126,529,100
Plus Outstanding EDTIF Fee Credits (as of 6/30/21) $53,929,941
Less Current EDTIF Fund Balance (as of 6/30/21) ($13,577,379)
Total EDTIF Amount $166,881,662
Divided by Number of New PM Peak Hour Trips 12,136
Maximum Fee per New PM Peak Hour Trip $13,751
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021.
It is important to note that the fee calculation shown in Table 5 is intended to represent the maximum fee
that could be charged to support the list of projects shown above.
The fees would be charged to new development of all types located in the geographic area covered by the
EDTIF. In order to allocate the fees equitably among different development types, the fee amounts charged
to each land use category should reflect the relative effects of each category on the transportation system.
This is consistent with the approach used in the current fee program, which specifies different fee rates for
different land use types. Using the maximum fee per new PM peak hour trip calculated in Table 5 above as
a basis, the number of PM peak hour trips associated with a representative sample of land use categories
has been estimated and the associated fee amount calculated. Error! Reference source not found. shows
the results of those calculations for several typical land use categories, along with an informational
comparison of the updated fees to the fee rates currently charged through the existing EDTIF program. It
should be remembered that the existing EDTIF program assesses a project’s fees based on its daily trips
whereas the updated EDTIF is going to assess fees based on PM peak hour trips. Updated EDTIF fee
calculations for a wider range of land use categories are shown in Appendix E.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
17
TABLE 6: FEE AMOUNTS FOR TYPICAL LAND USE CATEGORIES
Category Unit1
Updated EDTIF Fees Current EDTIF Fees
Adjusted PM Peak
Hour Trip Rate2
Fee per New PM Peak
Hour Trip
Updated Fee per
Unit Current Fee per Unit
Single-Family/Medium Density
Residential (up to 14 units/acre) DU 0.99 $13,751 $13,613 $11,829
Medium/High Density Residential
(14.1 – 25 units per acre) DU 0.56 $13,751 $7,701 $8,285
High Density Residential
(more than 25 units per acre) DU 0.44 $13,751 $6,050 $7,098
Hotel Room 0.60 $13,751 $8,251 $11,430
General Office KSF 1.15 $13,751 $15,814 $22,860
Restaurant (sit-down, high turnover) KSF 6.35 $13,751 $87,325 $118,872
Community Shopping Center KSF 2.48 $13,751 $34,054 $52,578
1. DU = Dwelling Unit; KSF = Thousand Square Feet.
2. Adjusted PM peak hour trip rates were taken from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, and a pass-by percentage of 35% has been applied to the uses that are considered
retail (i.e., the restaurant and shopping center).
Note that the EDTIF Fees shown above do not include the Freeway Interchange Fee or Residential BART Garage Fee, which are both described in the following section.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
18
FREEWAY INTERCHANGE FEE CALCULATIONS
The Freeway Interchange Fee is applied to new development within the Eastern Dublin area as a mechanism
for reimbursing the City of Pleasanton for the costs of making improvements to the interchanges on
Interstate 580 at Hacienda Drive and at Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road that benefit development in both
Pleasanton and Eastern Dublin. Pleasanton already constructed improvements at those two interchanges at
the time the Freeway Interchange Fee was created; the fee is a mechanism to allow development in East
Dublin to pay a proportional share of those costs.
The Freeway Interchange Fee was set at $21.46 per daily trip per Resolution No. 11-96, Exhibit C. The
agreement between Dublin and Pleasanton regarding transfer of fee revenues provided that the fee would
be automatically escalated each year, beginning with a base year of 1998 (the year of the revenue transfer
agreement between the two cities). The escalation index selected at that time was the Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF) interest rate, and that rate has been applied consistently by the City’s Finance
Department ever since. As of September 1, 2021, the current Freeway Interchange Fee per new daily trip is
$36.15 per daily trip. Note that this fee continues to be assessed per daily trip, whereas the updated EDTIF
is going to be assessed per PM peak hour trip for reasons described previously.
As of the end of FY21, the current balance remaining to be collected and transferred to Pleasanton is
$2,711,538. The Freeway Interchange Fee will continue to be collected until the outstanding balance is paid
off.
RESIDENTIAL BART GARAGE FEE CALCULATIONS
The Residential BART Garage Fee is a contribution toward additional parking spaces constructed at the East
Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station by the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority (ACSPA) and BART. Per
the terms of the agreement between Dublin and the ACSPA, the ACSPA is to receive a cumulative total of
$6 million in fees; as of the end of FY21, there was a remaining balance of $1.127 million yet to be collected.
The fees are collected only on residential development located outside the Dublin Transit Center area.
The Residential BART Garage Fee component is calculated as follows:
• Estimate the portion of future residential development in the EDTIF area that is outside the Transit
Center and thus would be subject to the fee. This has been calculated as 1,735 total new dwelling
units in the overall EDTIF area minus 464 units anticipated within the Transit Center area, for a
remainder of 1,271 new dwelling units that will be subject to the Residential BART Garage Fee.
• Divide the remaining $1.127 million due to the ACSPA by the 1,271 new residential units subject
to the fee, for a resulting fee of $887 per dwelling unit.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
19
A summary of the three fee components is shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7: SUMMARY OF UPDATED FEES
Category Unit1 Updated EDTIF Fee Updated Freeway
Interchange Fee
Updated BART
Garage Fee2
Single-Family/Medium
Density Residential (up to
14 units/acre)
DU $13,613 $362 $887
Medium/High Density
Residential (14.1 – 25
units per acre)
DU $7,701 $253 $502
High Density Residential
(more than 25 units per
acre)
DU $6,050 $217 $394
Hotel Room $8,251 $362 $0
General Office KSF $15,814 $723 $0
Restaurant (sit-down, high
turnover) KSF $87,325 $4,808 $0
Community Shopping
Center KSF $34,054 $1,663 $0
1. DU = Dwelling Unit; KSF = Thousand Square Feet.
2. BART Garage Fee is charged only on residential development located outside DTC area.
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
20
5. SUMMARY OF REQUIRED PROGRAM ELEMENTS
This report has provided a detailed discussion of the elements of the updated Eastern Dublin Transportation
Impact Fee program and explained the analytical techniques used to develop this nexus study. The report
addresses all of the fee program elements required by AB 1600, as summarized below.
1. Identifying the purpose of the fee
The Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee (EDTIF) program has been in place for more than 20 years.
Consistent with the provisions of the City’s General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, t he purpose
of the EDTIF program is to support public improvements and facilities needed to mitigate the traffic-related
impacts of new development in eastern Dublin.
2. Identifying how the fee will be used and the facilities to be funded through the fee
The fee will be used to help fund capital improvement projects that will accommodate future transportation
needs in eastern Dublin. Table 1 identifies the projects to be funded through the fee.
3. Determining a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development on which
the fee is imposed
As described in this report, different types of development generate traffic with different characteristics.
The fee amounts presented in Error! Reference source not found. account for these different
characteristics by applying different per-unit fee factors to each type of development. These considerations
account for the differential impacts on the local transportation system generated by different development
types.
4. Determining a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of
development on which the fee is imposed
The need for the facilities listed in Table 1 has been established through the prior EDTIF nexus studies, as
well as through planning studies sponsored by the City over the last several years, as described in Section
2 of this report. Table 4 shows that there are no existing deficiencies on the facilities included in this EDTIF
program, indicating that the need for improvements is not caused by existing development.
5. Determining a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public
facility (or portion of facility) attributable to new development
Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update, Final Report
December 2021
21
Section 4 of this report describes the calculations applied to determine the cost of the public facility that is
attributable to new development; this process accounts for the effects of existing deficiencies (of which
there are none in this program) and the effects of traffic generated from outside the EDTIF area. Thus, a
reasonable effort has been made to quantitatively establish the relationship between the fees charged in
the EDTIF program and the costs of public improvements attributable to new development within the
EDTIF area.
APPENDIX A:
CURRENT EDTIF PROJECTS
TABLE A-1:STATUS OF EAST DUBLIN TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROJECTS SINCE ADOPTION OF EDTIF
Segment #Project Description from old EDTIF Current Status
Include in Updated
EDTIF?
Updated EDTIF Project
Designation
SECTION I IMPROVEMENTS *Section I/II distinction no longer necessary8Dublin Boulevard Extension - Southern Pacific R/W to East BART Access Project is complete No8ADublin Boulevard Extension - East BART Access to Hacienda Drive Planned Yes Project A9Dublin Boulevard - Hacienda to Tassajara Road Planned Yes Project A10Dublin Boulevard - Tassajara Road to Fallon Road Under construction Yes Project A11Dublin Boulevard Extension - Fallon Road to Airway Planned Yes Project A13Hacienda - I-580 to Dublin Boulevard Extension (not including interchange)Project is complete No
14 Hacienda - Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Drive
Updated to maintain 4 lane segment; some widening needed to provide 4 lanes.Yes Project J15Hacienda Road - Freeway Interchange improvements Planned Yes Project B16Arnold Road - Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Project is complete No16ACentral Parkway - Arnold to Hacienda Planned Yes Project C17Central Parkway - Hacienda to Tassajara Planned Yes Project C18Central Parkway - Tassajara Road to Keegan Street Planned Yes Project C18ACentral Parkway - Keegan Street to Fallon Project is complete No19Gleason - Arnold Road to Hacienda: signal and frontage improvements Planned Yes Project D19AGleason - Hacienda to Tassajara Project is complete No20Gleason - Tassajara to Fallon Planned Yes Project D22Tassajara Road - 5,000 feet north of Gleason to Contra Costa County Line: turn lanes Planned Yes Project E22ATassajara Road - Gleason Road to 5,000 feet north of Gleason Road: 6 lanes Partially complete Yes Project E23Tassajara Road - Dublin Boulevard Extension to Gleason Road: 6 lanes Planned Yes Project E24Tassajara Road - Dublin Boulevard Extension to I-580: 6 lanes Planned Yes Project E25Tassajara Road - Freeway Interchange improvements Planned Yes Project F26Fallon Road - Tassajara to Gleason Project is complete No26AFallon Road - Gleason to Dublin Boulevard: three SB lanes, medians between Dublin and Central Planned Yes Project G27Fallon Road - Dublin Boulevard to North of I-580: 8 lanes Planned Yes Project G
SECTION II IMPROVEMENTS *Section I/II distinction no longer necessary
1 Dougherty Road - City Limits to Amador Valley Widening Project is complete No2Dougherty Road - Amador Valley Boulevard to Houston Place Project is complete No3Dougherty Road - Houston Place to Dublin Boulevard Project is complete No4Dougherty Road - Dublin Boulevard to North of I-580 Off Ramp Project is complete No5Dublin Boulevard - East of Village Parkway to Sierra Court Widening Project is complete No6Dublin Boulevard - Sierra Court to Dougherty Road Widening Partially complete Yes Project A7Dublin Boulevard - Dougherty to Southern Pacific Right-of-Way Project is complete No12Freeway Interchange - Dublin Boulevard Extension with I-580 (Airway Blvd)Project is complete No21Scarlett Drive - Extend from Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard Under construction Yes Project H28Fallon and I-580 Freeway Interchange with Signals Planned Yes Project I
SECTION I RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS *Section I/II distinction no longer necessary
29 Tassajara Creek Bike Path
Some segments completed, EBRPD working on remaining section No30Park and Ride Lots Project is complete No31Iron Horse Trail Bridge Crossing at Dublin Blvd New Project Yes Project K
32 Altamirano Class I Trail New Project Yes Project LOTHER COSTS INCLUDED IN 2010 TIF UPDATEBrighton Drive and Amador Valley Boulevard, install traffic signal Project is complete No
Village Parkway and Amador Valley Boulevard, lengthen southbound left-turn lane
Based on recent traffic volume review, project is no longer needed NoOther miscellaneous costs, such as traffic signal upgrades, update of nexus study, and travel model update, have been reviewed and updated and are now shown in Table 1 of updated EDTIF Report Costs have been updated Yes
* Section I and Section II are now combined into one single fee schedule. See the EDTIF Nexus Report for more details.
APPENDIX B:
DETAILED INFORMATION ON UPDATED EDTIF PROJECTS
PROJECT A:
DUBLIN BOULEVARD
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 6
Segment 6 Dublin Blvd from Sierra Court to Dougherty Road
Date: 8/1/2017
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $226,000.00 $226,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $181,000.00 $181,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $46,000.00 $46,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $46,000.00 $46,000
$499,000
5 New Sign and Post 5 EA $700.00 $3,500
6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 5 EA $900.00 $4,500
$8,000
7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 3,600 LF $1.00 $3,600
8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)1,750 LF $1.50 $2,625
9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 100 LF $4.80 $480
10 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)150 SF $12.00 $1,800
11 Remove Traffic Legend 100 SF $3.00 $300
12 Remove Traffic Stripe 3,500 LF $3.00 $10,500
$19,305
13 Sawcutting 2,100 LF $5.00 $10,500
14 Pavement Section 6,400 SF $23.00 $147,200
15 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 2,100 SF $55.00 $115,500
16 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,200 LF $90.00 $108,000
17 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000
$399,200
18 Remove AC Pavement 2,100 SF $5.00 $10,500
19 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter 1,200 LF $20.00 $24,000
20 Remove Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Ramp 15,300 SF $16.00 $244,800
$279,300
21 Concrete Sidewalk 8,700 SF $20.00 $174,000
22 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 8,400 SF $55.00 $462,000
$636,000
23 Signal Modifications at Dublin Blvd./Sierra Ct. 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000
24 Signal Modifications at Dublin Blvd./Dublin Ct. 1 LS $271,000.00 $271,000
$421,000
$2,261,805
$452,361
$339,271
$339,271
$20,000
$3,412,708
$207,833.89
$3,620,541.39
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Signing
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
SUBTOTAL
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
Frontage Improvements
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE (2019 DOLLARS)
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 8A
Segment 8A Dublin Blvd from Iron Horse Parkway to Hacienda Drive
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $44,000.00 $44,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $36,000.00 $36,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $9,000.00 $9,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $9,000.00 $9,000
$98,000
5 New Sign and Post 2 EA $700.00 $1,400
6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 1 EA $900.00 $900
$2,300
7 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 0 LF $4.80 $0
8 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)0 SF $12.00 $0
$0
9 Sawcutting 450 LF $5.00 $2,250
10 Pavement Section 5,000 SF $23.00 $115,000
11 Concrete Curb 450 LF $85.00 $38,250
12 Bus Pullout 1 EA $35,000.00 $35,000
13 Bus Shelter 1 EA $20,000.00 $20,000
$210,500
14 Clear and Grub 1,000 SF $1.00 $1,000
$1,000
15 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0
16 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0
17 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0
$0
18 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Arnold 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000
19 Street lighting 5 EA $6,000.00 $30,000
$130,000
$441,800
$88,360
$66,270
$66,270
$30,000
$692,700
$42,185.43
$734,885.43
Signing
Contingency (20%)
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Frontage Improvements
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Electrical
SUBTOTAL
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Electrical
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Paving/Curb
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 9
Segment 9 Dublin Blvd from Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $149,000.00 $149,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $120,000.00 $120,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000
$329,000
5 New Sign and Post 4 EA $700.00 $2,800
$2,800
6 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 1,000 LF $1.00 $1,000
7 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)360 LF $1.50 $540
8 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 560 LF $10.00 $5,600
9 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)105 SF $12.00 $1,260
10 Remove Traffic Stripe 550 LF $3.00 $1,650
11 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 280 LF $4.80 $1,344
$10,050
12 Sawcutting 1,000 LF $5.00 $5,000
13 Pavement Section 5,000 SF $23.00 $115,000
14 Concrete Curb 200 LF $85.00 $17,000
15 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 3,000 SF $55.00 $165,000
16 Concrete Curb & Gutter 750 LF $90.00 $67,500
17 Bus Pullout 1 EA $35,000.00 $35,000
18 Modify Bus Stop 1 EA $10,000.00 $10,000
19 Slurry Seal 76,000 SF $2.00 $152,000
20 Curb Ramp 6 EA $9,000.00 $54,000
$620,500
21 Deepened Curb and Gutter 110 LF $150.00 $16,500
22 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 50 LF $30.00 $1,500
23 Biotreatment Soil 10 CY $150.00 $1,500
24 Permeable Rock 10 CY $100.00 $1,000
$20,500
21 Remove AC Pavement 900 SF $5.00 $4,500
22 Remove Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Ramp 6,700 SF $16.00 $107,200
23 Remove Tree 2 EA $2,500.00 $5,000
$116,700
24 Concrete Sidewalk 6,000 SF $20.00 $120,000
25 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 3,000 SF $55.00 $165,000
26 Landscaping 4,500 SF $10.00 $45,000
$285,000
26 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Hacienda 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000
$100,000
$1,484,550
$296,910
$222,683
$222,683
$15,000
$2,241,825
$136,527.14
$2,378,352.14
Subtotal - Green Infrastructure
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Signing
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
SUBTOTAL
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
Frontage Improvements
Stormwater Improvements
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 10
Segment 10 Dublin Blvd from Tassajara Road to Fallon Road
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG); Updated 1/6/2020 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $130,000.00 $130,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $104,000.00 $104,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $26,000.00 $26,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $26,000.00 $26,000
$286,000
5 New Sign and Post 5 EA $700.00 $3,500
6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 2 EA $900.00 $1,800
$5,300
7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 500 LF $1.00 $500
8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)500 LF $1.50 $750
9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 200 LF $4.80 $960
10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 200 LF $10.00 $2,000
11 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)200 SF $12.00 $2,400
12 Remove Traffic Legend 280 SF $3.00 $840
13 Remove Traffic Stripe 500 LF $3.00 $1,500
$8,950
14 Sawcutting 400 LF $5.00 $2,000
15 Pavement Section 21,000 SF $23.00 $483,000
16 Curb Ramp 12 EA $9,000.00 $108,000
17 Concrete Curb 0 LF $85.00 $0
18 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000
19 Bus Shelter 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000
$703,000
20 Excavation 1,260 CY $75.00 $94,500
21 Clear and Grub 2,000 SF $1.00 $2,000
$96,500
22 Deepened Curb and Gutter 450 LF $150.00 $67,500
23 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 210 LF $30.00 $6,300
24 Biotreatment Soil 35 CY $150.00 $5,250
25 Permeable Rock 24 CY $100.00 $2,400
$81,450
26 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Dublin 1 LS $80,000.00 $80,000
27 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Brannigan 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000
28 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Keegan 0 LS $90,000.00 $0
29 Signal Modifications at Dublin/Lockhart 0 LS $150,000.00 $0
30 Street lighting 0 EA $6,000.00 $0
$130,000
$1,311,200
$262,240
$196,680
$196,680
$65,000
$2,031,800
$123,736.62
$2,155,536.62
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Subtotal - Green Infrastructure
Signing
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
SUBTOTAL
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
Stormwater Improvements
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
Segment 11
$5,943,840.00
$103,543,840.00
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
PROJECT B:
HACIENDA/I-580 INTERCHANGE
Project B: I-580/Hacienda Drive Interchange
Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate
Date: Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
Description
Cost Estimate, 2018
EDTIF Report*
2017-2021
Construction Cost
Escalation (3%
Annualized)
Updated Cost
Estimate
Reconstruct overcrossing with additional NB lane; widen EB off-ramp with
third left-turn lane; modify WB loop on-ramp; widen WB off-ramp with third
left-turn lane 12,834,416.00$ 1,610,832.28$ 14,445,248.28$
*Cost estimate represented 2017 dollars
28
PROJECT C:
CENTRAL PARKWAY
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 16A
Segment 16A Central Parkway between Arnold Road and Hacienda Drive
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $120,000.00 $120,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $96,000.00 $96,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $24,000.00 $24,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $24,000.00 $24,000
$264,000
5 New Sign and Post 4 EA $700.00 $2,800
6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 5 EA $900.00 $4,500
$7,300
7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 1,650 LF $1.00 $1,650
8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)1,900 LF $1.50 $2,850
9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 510 LF $4.80 $2,448
10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 100 LF $10.00 $1,000
11 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)420 SF $12.00 $5,040
12 Remove Traffic Legend 100 SF $3.00 $300
13 Remove Traffic Stripe 560 LF $3.00 $1,680
$14,968
14 Sawcutting 2,000 LF $5.00 $10,000
15 Pavement Section 15,500 SF $23.00 $356,500
16 Concrete Curb 1,250 LF $85.00 $106,250
17 Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $90.00 $0
18 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000
$490,750
19 Deepened Curb and Gutter 200 LF $150.00 $30,000
20 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 100 LF $30.00 $3,000
21 Biotreatment Soil 20 CY $150.00 $3,000
22 Permeable Rock 15 CY $100.00 $1,500
$37,500
19 Remove AC Pavement 4,300 SF $5.00 $21,500
20 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter 1,250 LF $20.00 $25,000
21 Clear and Grub 14,000 SF $1.00 $14,000
$60,500
22 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0
23 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0
24 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0
$0
25 New Traffic Sginal at Central/Sybase 1 EA $300,000.00 $300,000
26 Street lighting 5 EA $6,000.00 $30,000
$330,000
$1,205,018
$241,004
$180,753
$180,753
$25,000
$1,832,527
$111,600.89
$1,944,127.89
Subtotal - Green Infrastructure
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Signing
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Stormwater Improvements
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Electrical
CIVIL ESTIMATE
SUBTOTAL
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
Frontage Improvements
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
Subtotal - Electrical
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 17
Segment 17 Central Parkway between Hacienda Drive and Tassajara Road
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000
$11,000
5 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 30 LF $10.00 $300
6 Remove Traffic Stripe 30 LF $3.00 $90
$390
7 Concrete Curb & Gutter 60 LF $90.00 $5,400
8 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000
$23,400
9 Concrete Sidewalk 500 SF $20.00 $10,000
10 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 500 SF $0.00 $0
$10,000
$44,790
$8,958
$6,719
$6,719
$5,000
$72,185
$4,396.07
$76,581.07
CIVIL ESTIMATE
Subtotal - Paving Curb
SUBTOTAL
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Frontage Improvements
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Subtotal - Striping
Paving/Curb
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Striping
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 18
Segment 18 Central Parkway between Tassajara Road and Keegan Street
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG); Updated 1/9/2020 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $51,000.00 $51,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $41,000.00 $41,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $11,000.00 $11,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $11,000.00 $11,000
$114,000
5 2" AC Overlay 66,000 SF $4.00 $264,000
6 Curb Ramp 6 EA $9,000.00 $54,000
7 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000
$388,000
8 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0
9 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0
10 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0
$0
$502,000
$100,400
$75,300
$75,300
$0
$753,000
$45,857.70
$798,857.70
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
SUBTOTAL
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Frontage Improvements
Paving/Curb
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Subtotal - Paving Curb
PROJECT D:
GLEASON DRIVE
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 19
Segment 19 Gleason Drive between Arnold Road and Hacienda Drive
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $47,000.00 $47,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $38,000.00 $38,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000
$105,000
5 New Sign and Post 2 EA $700.00 $1,400
6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 3 EA $900.00 $2,700
$4,100
7 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)500 LF $1.50 $750
8 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 200 LF $10.00 $2,000
9 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)140 SF $12.00 $1,680
$4,430
10 Sawcutting 0 LF $5.00 $0
11 Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $90.00 $0
12 Curb Ramp 4 EA $9,000.00 $36,000
$36,000
13 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0
14 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0
$0
15 Street lighting 3 EA $6,000.00 $18,000
16 New Traffic Signal 1 EA $300,000.00 $300,000
$318,000
$467,530
$93,506
$70,130
$70,130
$5,000
$706,295
$43,013.37
$749,308.37
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Signing
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Frontage Improvements
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
SUBTOTAL
Contingency (20%)
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 20
Segment 20 Gleason Drive between Tassajara Road and Fallon Road
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG); Updated 1/13/2020 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $31,000.00 $31,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $7,000.00 $7,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $7,000.00 $7,000
$70,000
5 New Sign and Post 0 EA $700.00 $0
$0
6 2" AC Overlay 35,000 SF $4.00 $140,000
7 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000
8 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 0 LF $4.80 $0
9 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 250 LF $10.00 $2,500
10 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)230 SF $12.00 $2,760
11 Remove Traffic Legend 150 SF $3.00 $450
12 Remove Traffic Stripe 200 LF $3.00 $600
$216,310
13 Sawcutting 0 LF $5.00 $0
14 Pavement Section 0 SF $23.00 $0
15 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $46.00 $0
16 Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $90.00 $0
17 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000
$18,000
18 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0
19 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0
20 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0
$0
21 Signal Modification at Gleason/Tassajara 0 EA $80,000.00 $0
$0
$304,310
$60,862
$45,647
$45,647
$0
$456,465
$27,798.72
$484,263.72
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Signing
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
SUBTOTAL
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Frontage Improvements
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
PROJECT E:
TASSAJARA ROAD
2/13/2019
Tassajara Road Improvements (Segment 22- City Portion)
Fallon Road to City/County Limits
Description Budget
Construction
Engineers Estimate 6,054,752.50$
Contingency 15% 908,212.88$
Construction CCO Authority 10% 696,296.54$
Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2022 (6.7%)* 513,170.55$
Total Construction 8,172,432.46$
Right‐of‐way
Road R/W 0.65 acre $540K/acre 351,000.00$
R/W Engineering & Legal 20%of R/W 70,200.00$
Mitigation Land bank (Ave. Ratio 2.75 @35,000/ac) 1,241,346.59$
Creek Setback Mitigation 100,000.00$
Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2022 (6.7%)* 118,090.62$
Total Right‐of‐way 1,880,637.21$
Project Soft Costs
Environmental Study/CEQA 3% of Const. 229,778$
Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2021 (5.1%)* 11,719$
Environmental Study/CEQA Total 241,497$
Detail Design 12% of Const. 919,111$
Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2021 (5.1%)* 46,875$
Detail Design Total 965,986$
Total Project Soft Costs 1,207,483$
CM/Testing/Inspect/Permits
CM/RE/Inspection 13% of Const. 995,704$
Design Construction Support 2% of Const. 153,185$
Cost Rise Projected in Mid‐2022 (6.7%)* 76,976$
Total CM/Testing/Inspect/Permits 1,225,865$
Fees
Impervious Area Development Fee 113,300$
Total Project Estimate 12,599,717$
10/1/2021
Tassajara Road Improvements (Segment 1)
North Dublin Ranch Road to Quarry Lane School Road
Description Budget
Construction
Engineers Estimate 7,140,839.72$
Mobilization 15%714,083.97$
Contingency 15%1,178,238.55$
Cost Rise Projected in Mid-2021 (3%)*270,994.87$
Total Construction 9,304,157.11$
Construction CCO Authority 10% 930,415.71$
Total Construction Budget 10,234,572.82$
Total Construction Budget (Round) 10,235,000$
CM/Testing/Inspect
CM/RE/Inspection 10% of Const.930,416$
Design Construction Support 2% of Const. 186,083$
Cost Rise Projected in Mid-2022 (3% per year)**66,990$
Total CM/Testing/Inspect 1,183,489$
Total CM/Testing/Inspect (Round)1,183,000$
11,418,000$
Right‐of‐way
Road R/W 0.346 acre ***1,074,616.49$
Road R/W 0.100 acre ****62,116.56$
R/W Engineering & Legal 40%of R/W
Mitigation Land bank (Ave. Ratio 2.75 @35,000/ac)
Cost Rise Projected in Mid-2021 (3% per year)
Total Right‐of‐way 1,136,733.05$
Total Right‐of‐way (Round) 1,137,000.00$
12,555,000$
Design 970,232$
13,525,232$
Other Costs, Expenses and Contingencies
PW Staff Time 87,746$
City Attorney 10,000$
Total Staff Costs 97,746$
Env application 2,500$
Advertising 2,000$
Printing 5,000$
Total Expenses 9,500$
Fees
Impervious Area Development Fee 16,566$
PG&E Electrical Service 100,000$
DSRSD Irrigation Service 50,000$
DSRSD SS Limited Construction Permit 5,000$
Total Fees 171,566.00
278,812$
13,804,044$
Project Contingency 690,202$
5.00%
14,494,246$
14,494,000$
* Percentage of cost rise based on Construction Cost Indices and Forecast for 2020 & 2021.
** Assumed CPI increase of 3% per year.
***City valuations determined from the City of Dublin Appraisal Consulting Assignment Report, dated Septem
**** Rural Segment $540k per acre
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 22A
Segment 22A-South Tassajara Road - From Gleason Drive to North Dublin Ranch Drive
Date: 1/9/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%) 1 LS $240,000.00 $240,000
2 Traffic Control (8%) 1 LS $192,000.00 $192,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $48,000.00 $48,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $48,000.00 $48,000
$528,000
5 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 5,500 LF $1.00 $5,500
6 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)1,090 LF $1.50 $1,635
7 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 680 LF $4.80 $3,264
8 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 800 LF $10.00 $8,000
9 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)350 SF $12.00 $4,200
10 Remove Traffic Legend 130 SF $3.00 $390
11 Remove Traffic Stripe 420 LF $3.00 $1,260
$24,249
12 Sawcutting 3,700 LF $5.00 $18,500
13 Pavement Section 35,000 SF $23.00 $805,000
14 Concrete Curb 3,500 LF $85.00 $297,500
15 Curb Ramp 4 EA $9,000.00 $36,000
$1,157,000
16 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter 3,200 LF $20.00 $64,000
17 Remove Tree 11 EA $2,500.00 $27,500
18 Clear and Grub 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000
19 Excavation 1,500 CY $75.00 $112,500
$239,000
20 Deepened Curb and Gutter 70 LF $150.00 $10,500
21 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 30 LF $30.00 $900
22 Biotreatment Soil 5 CY $150.00 $750
23 Permeable Rock 3 CY $100.00 $300
$12,450
24 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Gleason 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000
25 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/S. Dublin Ranch 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000
26 Conversion of copper connection to fiber optic connection 2,500 LF $50.00 $125,000
$425,000
$2,385,699
$477,140
$357,855
$357,855
$20,000
$3,598,549
$219,151.60
$3,817,700.10
Contingency (20%)
Stormwater Improvements
Subtotal - Green Infrstructure
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Demolition & Removals
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
SUBTOTAL
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
20
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 23
Segment 23 Tassajara Road - Between Dublin Blvd and Gleason Drive
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG); Updated 1/9/2020 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $74,000.00 $74,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $60,000.00 $60,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000
$164,000
5 New Sign and Post 2 EA $700.00 $1,400
6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 2 EA $900.00 $1,800
$3,200
7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 1,000 LF $1.00 $1,000
8 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000
9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 250 LF $4.80 $1,200
10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 30 LF $10.00 $300
11 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)100 SF $12.00 $1,200
12 Remove Traffic Legend 100 SF $3.00 $300
13 Remove Traffic Stripe 250 LF $3.00 $750
$74,750
14 Sawcutting 1,000 LF $5.00 $5,000
15 Pavement Section 13,000 SF $23.00 $299,000
16 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $46.00 $0
17 Concrete Curb 820 LF $85.00 $69,700
18 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000
19 Curb Ramp 4 EA $9,000.00 $36,000
$479,700
20 Remove AC Pavement 1,000 SF $5.00 $5,000
21 Remove Concrete Curb 1,000 LF $20.00 $20,000
22 Excavation 220 CY $75.00 $16,500
$41,500
23 Deepened Curb and Gutter 270 LF $150.00 $40,500
24 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 130 LF $30.00 $3,900
25 Biotreatment Soil 22 CY $150.00 $3,250
26 Permeable Rock 14 CY $100.00 $1,444
$49,094
27 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Central 0 LS $50,000.00 $0
28 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/The Shops 0 LS $160,000.00 $0
29 1-A Pole 0 LS $30,000.00 $0
30 Street lighting 0 EA $6,000.00 $0
$0
$812,244
$162,449
$121,837
$121,837
$15,000
$1,233,367
$75,112.03
$1,308,478.70
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
SUBTOTAL
Stormwater Improvements
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Signing
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
21
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 24
Segment 24 Tassajara Road - Between I-580 Interchange and Dublin Blvd
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000
$11,000
5 New Sign and Post 1 EA $700.00 $700
6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 1 EA $900.00 $900
$1,600
7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 0 LF $1.00 $0
8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)0 LF $1.50 $0
9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 0 LF $4.80 $0
10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 0 LF $10.00 $0
11 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)0 SF $12.00 $0
12 Remove Traffic Legend 0 SF $3.00 $0
13 Remove Traffic Stripe 0 LF $3.00 $0
$0
14 Sawcutting 0 LF $5.00 $0
15 Pavement Section 0 SF $23.00 $0
16 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $46.00 $0
17 Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $90.00 $0
18 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000
$70,000
19 Remove AC Pavement 0 SF $5.00 $0
$0
20 Landscaping 0 SF $10.00 $0
21 Concrete Sidewalk 0 SF $20.00 $0
22 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0
$0
23 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Dublin 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000
24 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/Dublin Corporate Way 0 LS $75,000.00 $0
25 Signal Modifications at Tassajara/I-580 Westbound off-ramp 0 LS $150,000.00 $0
26 Street lighting 0 EA $6,000.00 $0
$30,000
$112,600
$22,520
$16,890
$16,890
$0
$168,900
$10,286.01
$179,186.01
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
SUBTOTAL
Frontage Improvements
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Signing
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
22
PROJECT F:
TASSAJARA/I-580 INTERCHANGE
Project F: I-580/Tassajara Road Interchange
Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate
Date: Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
Description Cost Estimate,
2018 EDTIF
Report*
2017-2021
Construction Cost
Escalation (3%
Annualized)
Updated Cost
Estimate
Widen eastbound off-ramp approach at Tassajara
Road to provide fifth lane 3,827,397.00$ 480,372.04$ 4,307,769.04$
*Cost estimate represented 2017 dollars
29
PROJECT G:
FALLON ROAD
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 26A
Segment 26A Fallon Road between Gleason Drive and Dublin Blvd
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $330,000.00 $330,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $264,000.00 $264,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $66,000.00 $66,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $66,000.00 $66,000
$726,000
5 New Sign and Post 4 EA $700.00 $2,800
6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 1 EA $900.00 $900
$3,700
7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 5,300 LF $1.00 $5,300
8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)3,300 LF $1.50 $4,950
9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 800 LF $4.80 $3,840
10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 1,000 LF $10.00 $10,000
11 Detail 22 - Double Yellow Center Line 400 LF $2.00 $800
12 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)890 SF $12.00 $10,680
13 Remove Traffic Legend 180 SF $3.00 $540
14 Remove Traffic Stripe 5,500 LF $3.00 $16,500
$52,610
15 Sawcutting 4,000 LF $5.00 $20,000
16 Pavement Section 32,600 SF $23.00 $749,800
17 Bus Pullout 1 EA $35,000.00 $35,000
18 Concrete Curb 2,450 LF $85.00 $208,250
19 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,200 LF $90.00 $108,000
20 Narrow Raised Median (< 2') 200 LF $12.00 $2,400
21 Curb Ramp 2 EA $9,000.00 $18,000
$1,141,450
22 Excavation 1,250 CY $75.00 $93,750
$93,750
23 Landscaping 32,300 SF $10.00 $323,000
24 Concrete Sidewalk 6,750 SF $20.00 $135,000
25 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 4,500 SF $55.00 $247,500
$705,500
26 Deepened Curb and Gutter 800 LF $150.00 $120,000
27 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 400 LF $30.00 $12,000
28 Biotreatment Soil 70 CY $150.00 $10,500
29 Permeable Rock 45 CY $100.00 $4,500
$147,000
26 Partial Signal Modifications at North Leg of Dublin/Fallon 1 LS $120,000.00 $120,000
27 Signal Modification at Central/Fallon 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000
28 Street lighting 17 EA $6,000.00 $102,000
$422,000
$3,292,010
$658,402
$493,802
$493,802
$10,000
$4,948,015
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Signing
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
Frontage Improvements
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
SUBTOTAL
Stormwater Improvements
Subtotal - Green Infrastructure
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
23
$301,334.11
$5,249,349.11
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
24
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 27
Segment 27 Fallon Road between Dublin Boulevard and North of I-580
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $175,000.00 $175,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $140,000.00 $140,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000
$385,000
5 New Sign and Post 8 EA $700.00 $5,600
6 New Sign on Signal Mast Arm 6 EA $900.00 $5,400
$11,000
7 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 7,250 LF $1.00 $7,250
8 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)3,000 LF $1.50 $4,500
9 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 1,500 LF $4.80 $7,200
10 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 1,200 LF $10.00 $12,000
11 Detail 22 - Double Yellow Center Line 600 LF $2.00 $1,200
12 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)1,360 SF $12.00 $16,320
13 Remove Traffic Legend 1,500 SF $3.00 $4,500
14 Remove Traffic Stripe 2,000 LF $3.00 $6,000
$58,970
15 Sawcutting 4,500 LF $5.00 $22,500
16 Pavement Section 23,000 SF $23.00 $529,000
17 Roadway Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $46.00 $0
18 Concrete Curb 2,300 LF $85.00 $195,500
19 Bus Pullout 1 EA $35,000.00 $35,000
20 Narrow Raised Median (< 2') 600 LF $7.50 $4,500
21 Curb Ramp 5 EA $9,000.00 $45,000
$831,500
22 Remove AC Pavement 22,250 SF $5.00 $111,250
$111,250
23 Deepened Curb and Gutter 470 LF $150.00 $70,500
24 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 230 LF $30.00 $6,900
25 Biotreatment Soil 40 CY $150.00 $6,000
26 Permeable Rock 30 CY $100.00 $3,000
$86,400
27 Partial Signal Modifications at South Leg of Dublin/Fallon 1 EA $100,000.00 $100,000
28 New Traffic Signal at Fallon/Fallon Gateway 0 EA $300,000.00 $0
29 Signal Modification at Fallon/I-580 SB Exit Ramp 1 EA $120,000.00 $120,000
30 Street lighting 12 EA $6,000.00 $72,000
$292,000
$1,776,120
$355,224
$266,418
$266,418
$85,000
$2,749,180
$167,425.06
$2,916,605.06
SUBTOTAL
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
Stormwater Improvements
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Signing
Subtotal - Green Infrastructure
Electrical
Subtotal - Electrical
Subtotal - Signing
Striping
Subtotal - Striping
Paving/Curb
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
Contingency (20%)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
CIVIL ESTIMATE
25
PROJECT H:
SCARLETT DRIVE
Segment 21
$519,477.00
$9,049,477.00
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
PROJECT I:
FALLON/I-580 INTERCHANGE
Project I: I-580/Fallon Road Interchange
Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate
Date: Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
Description Cost Estimate,
2018 EDTIF
Report*
2017-2021
Construction Cost
Escalation (3%
Annualized)
Updated Cost
Estimate
Reconstruct overcrossing with four lanes in each
direction; reconstruct SB to EB loop on-ramp; widen
EB off-ramp with two exit lanes with two left-turn and
two right-turn lanes; widen EB on-ramp; widen WB off-
ramp with two left-turn and two right-turn lanes; and
widen WB on-ramp (remaining Dublin Phase 2
Contributions)3,826,360.00$ 480,241.89$ 4,306,601.89$
*Cost estimate represented 2017 dollars
30
PROJECT J:
HACIENDA DRIVE
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ESTIMATE SEGMENT 14
Segment 14 Hacienda Drive between Dublin Boulevard and Gleason Drive
Date: 8/1/2017; Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
By:CHS Consulting Group and Pakpour Consulting Group
ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty.UNIT Unit Cost Total
1 Mobilization (10%)1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000
2 Traffic Control (8%)1 LS $160,000.00 $160,000
3 SWPPP/Erosion Control (2%) 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000
4 Construction Staking (2%) 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000
$440,000
5 Detail 9 - 4" Dashed Lane Line 2,300 LF $1.00 $2,300
6 Bicycle Lane (Thermoplastic)1,200 LF $1.50 $1,800
7 Detail 38 - 8" Channelization Line 550 LF $4.80 $2,640
8 12" Limit Line/Crosswalk 350 LF $10.00 $3,500
9 Detail 22 - Double Yellow Center Line 50 LF $2.00 $100
10 Pavement Legends (Thermoplastic)510 SF $12.00 $6,120
11 Remove Traffic Legend 200 SF $3.00 $600
12 Remove Traffic Stripe 2,900 LF $3.00 $8,700
$25,760
13 Sawcutting 2,750 LF $5.00 $13,750
14 Pavement Section 28,300 SF $23.00 $650,900
15 Bus Pullout 2 EA $35,000.00 $70,000
16 Concrete Curb 1,600 LF $85.00 $136,000
17 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,000 LF $90.00 $90,000
18 Curb Ramp 20 EA $9,000.00 $180,000
$1,140,650
19 Deepened Curb and Gutter 350 LF $150.00 $52,500
20 4" Underdrain with Cleanout 170 LF $30.00 $5,100
21 Biotreatment Soil 30 CY $150.00 $4,500
22 Permeable Rock 20 CY $100.00 $2,000
$64,100
23 Remove AC Pavement 5,700 SF $5.00 $28,500
24 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter 1,000 LF $20.00 $20,000
25 Remove Concrete Sidewalk/Curb Ramp 8,000 SF $16.00 $128,000
26 Clear and Grub 21,400 SF $1.00 $21,400
$197,900
27 Concrete Sidewalk 1,000 SF $20.00 $20,000
28 Frontage Right of Way Acquisition 0 SF $55.00 $0
$20,000
29 Signal Modifications at Hacienda/Central 1 EA $40,000.00 $40,000
30 Signal Modifications at Hacienda/Dublin 1 EA $40,000.00 $40,000
31 Street lighting 12 EA $6,000.00 $72,000
$152,000
$2,040,410
$408,082
$306,062
$306,062
$30,000
$3,090,615
$188,218.45
$3,278,833.45
Paving/Curb
Demolition & Removals
Subtotal - Electrical
Electrical
Subtotal - Paving Curb
Frontage Improvements
Subtotal - Frontage Improvements
Stormwater Improvements
Subtotal - Green Infrastructure
SUBTOTAL
$1/SF Zone 7 Drainage Fee
Description:
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
General
Subtotal - General
Subtotal - Striping
Striping
Subtotal - Demolition & Removals
Escalation factor at 3% annually (2019 to 2021)
ADJUSTED CIVIL ESTIMATE (2021 DOLLARS)
CIVIL ESTIMATE
Soft Costs (15% Construction Management, Inspection & Testing)
Soft Costs (15% Design/Environmental)
Contingency (20%)
PROJECT K:
IRON HORSE TRAIL CROSSING
Project K
Project K: Iron Horse Trail Overcrossing
Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate
Date: Updated 9/29/21 (Per City provided estimate)
Description Cost Estimate
Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing across Dublin Blvd along
the Iron Horse Trail 11,604,439.00$
PROJECT L:
ALTAMIRANO CLASS I TRAIL
Project L: Segment 32 - Altamirano Avenue Class I Trail
Description: Preliminary Cost Estimate
Date: Updated 6/28/2019 (PCG)
Description Cost Estimate,
2018 EDTIF
Report*
2017-2021
Construction Cost
Escalation (3%
Annualized)
Updated Cost
Estimate
Class I Trail; 1,400' Long, 14 feet wide 1,379,000.00$ 173,076.65$ 1,552,076.65$
*Cost estimate represented 2017 dollars
27
APPENDIX C:
GROWTH PROJECTIONS
TASSAJARA RDFALLON RDCENTRAL PKWY
DUBLIN BLVDHACIENDA DRDOUGHERTY RDAMADOR VALLEY BLVD1014
985
992
2136
1029
2137
1030
1028
2138
979978
1001
975
2139
966
994
1002
2124
995
1048
1050
1035
2135
1031
1123
2123
2122
2145
1034
1033
1388
1015
973
1213
1049
1046
1013
1155
967
982
1216 12171121
991
996
1032
990 1027
1010
993
1036
1016
980 1038
1024
965 984983 1043986
989 1195
1022969
1025
1125
968
1018
1042
1045
1193
1019
2125
1118
10201005
997
1012
1021
1037
1117
1009
1101
1023
1007
971
988976
11001157
1044
987
1194
977
1041
1097
1099 1102
1026
1017
999
1051
1000
1388
1047
1040
981
1052
1011
1211
1192
1198
1156
2141
1008
1004 1006
1093
1039
1106
1003
974 998
11241172
1395
1196
11191098
960
1214
970
N
NOT TO SCALE
Eastern Dublin TAZs
Legend
TAZ Boundaries
Eastern Dublin
§¨¦580
0211016
021
992
998
1004
Figure C-1: Eastern Dublin TAZs
*The area shaded in yellow is being removed from the East Dublin TIF area
TABLE C-1: EAST DUBLIN GROWTH BY LAND USE CATEGORY
Land Use Category Base Year (2020) Future Year (2040) Growth (Base Year to 2040)
Households
Single Family Dwelling Units 9,375 10,827 1,452
Multi-Family Dwelling Units 2,531 2,814 283
Total Households 11,906 13,641 1,735
Employment
Retail Jobs 3,204 6,849 3,645
Office Jobs 9,747 25,179 15,432
Manufacturing Jobs 440 1,786 1,346
Total Employment 13,391 33,814 20,423
APPENDIX D:
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA
TABLE D-1: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS CRITERIA
Level of Service Description Delay in Seconds
A
Progression is extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive
during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all.
Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay.
< 10.0
B
Progression is good, cycle lengths are short, or both. More
vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of
average delay.
> 10.0 to 20.0
C
Higher congestion may result from fair progression, longer
cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to
appear at this level, though many still pass through the
intersection without stopping.
> 20.0 to 35.0
D
The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable.
Longer delays may result from some combination of
unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C
ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles
not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are
noticeable.
> 35.0 to 55.0
E
This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of
acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate
poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios.
Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences.
> 55.0 to 80.0
F
This level is considered unacceptable with oversaturation,
which is when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the
intersection. This level may also occur at high V/C ratios
below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor
progression and long cycle lengths may also be contributing
factors to such delay levels.
> 80.0
Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual.
APPENDIX E:
EDTIF FEE AMOUNTS BY LAND USE CATEGORY
EDTIF Fee Calculations by Land Use Category
Category Unit
PM Pk Hr Trip
Rate
Pass-by
Adjustment
Adjusted PM Pk Hr
Trip Rate
Fee per PM Pk Hr
Trip Fee per Unit
RESIDENTIAL:
Single-Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre)DU 0.99 0 0.99 $13,751 $13,613
Medium-Density Residential (6-14 units/acre)DU 0.99 0 0.99 $13,751 $13,613
Medium/High Density Residential (14-25 units/acre)DU 0.56 0 0.56 $13,751 $7,701
High Density Residential (greater than 25 units/acre)DU 0.44 0 0.44 $13,751 $6,050
HOTEL:Room 0.60 0 0.60 $13,751 $8,251
OFFICE: General Office KSF 1.15 0 1.15 $13,751 $15,814
RECREATION:
Recreation Community Center KSF 2.31 0 2.31 $13,751 $31,765
Health Club KSF 3.45 0 3.45 $13,751 $47,441
Bowling Center KSF 1.16 0 1.16 $13,751 $15,951
Golf Course Acre 0.28 0 0.28 $13,751 $3,850
Tennis Courts Court 4.21 0 4.21 $13,751 $57,892
Movie Theater (multi-plex)Screen 13.64 -35%8.87 $13,751 $121,916
Theater, Live Seat 0.02 0 0.02 $13,751 $275
EDUCATION: Private School (K-8)Student 0.26 0 0.26 $13,751 $3,575
HOSPITAL:
General Hospital Bed 1.42 0 1.42 $13,751 $19,526
Convalescent/Nursing Bed 0.22 0 0.22 $13,751 $3,025
CHURCH:KSF 0.49 0 0.49 $13,751 $6,738
INDUSTRIAL: Light Industrial KSF 0.63 0 0.63 $13,751 $8,663
RESTAURANT:
Quality (leisure)KSF 7.80 -35%5.07 $13,751 $69,717
Sit-down, high-turnover KSF 9.77 -35%6.35 $13,751 $87,325
Fast food, no drive-through KSF 28.34 -35%18.42 $13,751 $253,306
Fast food, with drive-through KSF 32.67 -35%21.24 $13,751 $292,009
Coffee shop, with drive-through KSF 43.38 -35%28.20 $13,751 $387,736
AUTOMOTIVE:
Gas station Pump 13.87 -35%9.02 $13,751 $123,972
Auto sales/parts KSF 2.26 -35%1.47 $13,751 $20,200
Auto repair center KSF 3.11 0 3.11 $13,751 $42,765
FINANCIAL: Bank/savings and loan KSF 12.13 0 12.13 $13,751 $166,799
RETAIL:
Community shopping center KSF 3.81 -35%2.48 $13,751 $34,054
Supermarket KSF 9.24 -35%6.01 $13,751 $82,588
Convenience market KSF 49.11 -35%31.92 $13,751 $438,951
Discount store KSF 4.18 -35%2.72 $13,751 $37,361
Pharmacy with Drive-Through KSF 10.29 -35%6.69 $13,751 $91,973
Notes: Trip rates are drawn from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Residential categories are as set forth in the resolution. Fees for all non-residential categories,
including those not listed here, shall be categorized based on the definitions set forth in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition.
Updated EDTIF Calculations
EDTIF Fee Calculations by Land Use Category
Category Unit
PM Pk Hr Trip
Rate
Pass-by
Adjustment
Adjusted PM Pk Hr
Trip Rate
Fee per PM Pk Hr
Trip Fee per Unit
RESIDENTIAL:
Single-Family Residential (up to 6 units/acre)DU 0.99 0 0.99 $13,751 $13,613
Medium-Density Residential (6-14 units/acre)DU 0.99 0 0.99 $13,751 $13,613
Medium/High Density Residential (14-25 units/acre)DU 0.56 0 0.56 $13,751 $7,701
High Density Residential (greater than 25 units/acre)DU 0.44 0 0.44 $13,751 $6,050
HOTEL:Room 0.60 0 0.60 $13,751 $8,251
OFFICE: General Office KSF 1.15 0 1.15 $13,751 $15,814
RECREATION:
Recreation Community Center KSF 2.31 0 2.31 $13,751 $31,765
Health Club KSF 3.45 0 3.45 $13,751 $47,441
Bowling Center KSF 1.16 0 1.16 $13,751 $15,951
Golf Course Acre 0.28 0 0.28 $13,751 $3,850
Tennis Courts Court 4.21 0 4.21 $13,751 $57,892
Movie Theater (multi-plex)Screen 13.64 -35%8.87 $13,751 $121,916
Theater, Live Seat 0.02 0 0.02 $13,751 $275
EDUCATION: Private School (K-8)Student 0.26 0 0.26 $13,751 $3,575
HOSPITAL:
General Hospital Bed 1.42 0 1.42 $13,751 $19,526
Convalescent/Nursing Bed 0.22 0 0.22 $13,751 $3,025
CHURCH:KSF 0.49 0 0.49 $13,751 $6,738
INDUSTRIAL: Light Industrial KSF 0.63 0 0.63 $13,751 $8,663
RESTAURANT:
Quality (leisure)KSF 7.80 -35%5.07 $13,751 $69,717
Sit-down, high-turnover KSF 9.77 -35%6.35 $13,751 $87,325
Fast food, no drive-through KSF 28.34 -35%18.42 $13,751 $253,306
Fast food, with drive-through KSF 32.67 -35%21.24 $13,751 $292,009
Coffee shop, with drive-through KSF 43.38 -35%28.20 $13,751 $387,736
AUTOMOTIVE:
Gas station Pump 13.87 -35%9.02 $13,751 $123,972
Auto sales/parts KSF 2.26 -35%1.47 $13,751 $20,200
Auto repair center KSF 3.11 0 3.11 $13,751 $42,765
FINANCIAL: Bank/savings and loan KSF 12.13 0 12.13 $13,751 $166,799
RETAIL:
Community shopping center KSF 3.81 -35%2.48 $13,751 $34,054
Supermarket KSF 9.24 -35%6.01 $13,751 $82,588
Convenience market KSF 49.11 -35%31.92 $13,751 $438,951
Discount store KSF 4.18 -35%2.72 $13,751 $37,361
Pharmacy with Drive-Through KSF 10.29 -35%6.69 $13,751 $91,973
Notes: Trip rates are drawn from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Residential categories are as set forth in the resolution. Fees for all non-residential categories,
including those not listed here, shall be categorized based on the definitions set forth in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition.
Updated EDTIF Calculations
Attachment 3-Exhibit C to the Resolution
Attachment 5-Exhibit D to the Resolution
Dublin Boulevard
Hacienda Drive
Central Parkway
Gleason Drive
Tassajara Road
Fallon Road
Street Alignment Study
AREA OF BENEFIT
MAJOR THOROUGHFARES AND BRIDGES
WITHIN EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
Extend and widen to 6 lanes from the Southern Pacific
Right-of-Way to Airway Boulevard (from the EIR future
*Cost of Roadway *Cost of Bridge
Improvements Improvements
road improvement assumptions on pages 1 and 2 of the $ 27,780,432.39 $ 5,070,000.00
OKS revised report form December 15, 1992 and
mitigation measure 3.3/10).
Widen and extend as 4 lanes from Dublin Boulevard to
Gleason Drive and to 6 lanes from 1-580 to Dublin
Boulevard (from the EIR future road improvement
assumptions on page 1 of the OKS revised report).
Construct four-lane road from Dublin Boulevard west of
$ 942,195.00 $
Hacienda Drive to Fallon Road (from the EIR future road
improvement assumptions on page 1 of the OKS revised
report).
$ 4,453,310.63 $ 1,040,000.00
Construct new 4-lane road from west of Hacienda Drive
to Fallon road (from the EIR future road improvement
assumptions on page 1 of the OKS revised report). (The
project does not require extension of Gleason Drive to $
Doolan Road due to no development proposed in the
future study area.)
Widen to 4 lanes over a 6-lane right-of-way from Dublin
Boulevard to the Contra Costa County Line, and to 6
292,110.00 $
lanes over an 8-lane right-of-way from Dublin Boulevard
to 1-580 from the EIR future road improvement
assumptions on page 1 of the OKS revised report and
$ 33,065,738.01 $ 5,293,600.00
mitigation measure 3.3/14.0
Extend to Tassajara Road, widen to 4 lanes over a 6-
lane right-of-way from 1-580 to Tassajara road (from the
EIR future road improvement assumptions on page 1 of
the OKS revised report).
$ 9,247,554.20
A study is required to specify the exact street alignments $ in the Eastern Dublin area.
Right-of-Way Contingency Funds are required to acquire land in the event that right-
Total
of-way must be obtained through condemnation and $
value of land is greater than the appraised value.
$ 75,781,340.23 $ 11,403,600.00
The Area of Benefit Fee for roadway improvements based on 63,213 related trips for residential and 231,976 trips for non
residential is $2,570/unit for Low Density (1-6 units per acre) and Medium Density Residential (7-14 units per acre), $1,799
for Medium/High Density Residential (15-25 units per acre), and $1,542 for High Density Residential (more than 25 units per
acre); and $1,157 for High Density Residential (more than 25 units per acre) within the Transit Center; and $257/trip for non
residential.
The Area of Benefit Fee for bridge improvements for Low and Medium Density Residential is $390/unit, for Medium/High
Density Residential is $273/unit, and for High Density Residential is $234/unit, and for High Density Residential (within the
Transit Center) is $176/ unit; and non-residential is $39/trip.
The eastern Dublin Specific Plan area has 3,916 Low Density units; 4,863 Medium Density units; 2,680 Medium/High
Density units;and 3,952 High Density units.
*These cost estimates do not include credits due for construction of portions of these major thoroughfares and bridges. In
the event that the Area of Benefit Fee becomes effective, the appropriate credit amounts will be calculated and the Area of
Benefit Fee will be adjusted accordingly.
Attachment 6-Exhibit E to the Resolution
b
r
Document Description
Amendment Control
Project Name Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update
Related Documents City of Dublin General Plan (Amended November - 2014), Downtown
Dublin Specific Plan (Amended - October 2014), City of Dublin Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan (Updated October – 2014)
Document Name Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines
File Path G:\TRANSPORTATION\TIF\Eastern
Dublin\2021\12062021_materials_F&P
Date Document Approved December 21, 2021
City Council
Resolution
Number
Amendment
Date
Description of Change
122-13 07/16/2013 Adoption of Consolidated Impact Fee Guidelines, Superseding
previously adopted individual fee program guidelines
117-14 07/15/2014 Extension of Credit Life and Right-to-Reimbursement
111-15 06/16/2015 Extension of Credit for Perpetuity, Right-to-Reimbursement, and Park
Credit Conversion
147-16 09/06/2016 Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Update
109-17 08/05/2017 Fire Facilities Fee Credit and Right-to-Reimbursement
____-21 12/21/2021 Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee
Attachment 6-Exhibit E to the Resolution
Table of Contents
I. Introduction/Overview ..................................................................................................................... 1
II. Authority of City Manager to Interpret Situations Not Covered ..................................................... 1
III. Fee Administration........................................................................................................................... 2
A. Responsible Departments ...................................................................................................... 2
B. Effective Fees ........................................................................................................................ 2
C. Basis for Calculating Fees for Projects not Covered in Fee Resolutions .............................. 2
IV. Payment Records ............................................................................................................................. 4
V. Other Miscellaneous Administrative Guidelines ............................................................................. 4
A. Refunds ................................................................................................................................. 4
B. Annual Review of Fee Collection ......................................................................................... 4
C. Funds and Accounting .......................................................................................................... 5
D. Exemptions ........................................................................................................................... 5
E. Administrative Fees .............................................................................................................. 6
VI. Developer Fee Credits...................................................................................................................... 7
A. General .................................................................................................................................. 7
B. Fee Credit/Reimbursement Agreement Required ................................................................. 7
C. Calculating the Fee Credits ................................................................................................... 9
D. Use of Fee Credits ................................................................................................................. 9
E. Use of Fee Credits requires Completion of Facility or Performance Bonds ....................... 10
F. Transferring of Credits ........................................................................................................ 10
G. Options At or Prior to Expiration of Credit Life ................................................................. 10
H. Reimbursement Rights (Excluding EDTIF Section II Residential BART Garage Fees) .... 11
I. Process for Reimbursement of Reimbursement Rights....................................................... 11
J. Procedures for Construction of Designated Facilities by Developers ................................. 12
K. Guidelines for Issuing Trip Credits for Transportation Impact Fees .................................. 13
L. Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee-Section II Residential BART Garage ............. 14
Appendix A: Illustrative Examples
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 1
CITY OF DUBLIN CONSOLIDATED IMPACT FEE
ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES
I. Introduction/Overview
These guidelines apply to the Western Dublin Transportation (formerly known as the Downtown
Traffic) Impact Fees (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin through Resolution 210-
04 and as subsequently amended), the Eastern Dublin Transportation (formerly known as the
Eastern Dublin Traffic) Impact Fees (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin through
Resolution 1-95 and as subsequently amended), the Public Facilities Fees (adopted by the City
Council of the City of Dublin through Resolution 32-96 and as subsequently amended), the Fire
Facilities Fees (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin through Resolution 37-97 and
as subsequently amended), the Noise Mitigation Fee (adopted by the City Council of the City of
Dublin through Resolution 33-96 and as subsequently amended), and the Non-residential
Development Affordable Housing Impact Fee (adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin
through Resolution 70-05 and as subsequently amended) which fees are, unless otherwise
provided, hereinafter referred to as the "Fee" or "Fees." Except as otherwise provided herein,
terms used in these guidelines shall be defined in the same manner as such terms are defined in
the Resolution.
The application of these guidelines will, at times, refer to various reference documents adopted by
the City of Dublin. These documents include the City's General Plan, Specific Plans, and the most
recent Impact Fee Studies. Such reference documents are subject to change and may affect the
application of these guidelines.
II. Authority of City Manager to Interpret Situations Not Covered
Should situations arise not covered by these guidelines, the City Manager will have the authority
to determine how the resolutions, ordinances, guidelines and agreements will be administered.
Such interpretations by the City Manager will be in writing, and the City Manager’s
determination will be final and not appealable.
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 2
III. Fee Administration
A. Responsible Departments
The Administrative Services Department serves as the lead department to gather and coordinate
the information necessary to calculate the Fee. The Community Development Department is
responsible for determining the intended land use. The Public Works Department is responsible
for determining the number of vehicle trips assigned to the project.
B. Effective Fees
The Fee will be collected at the filing of final map and/or at the issuance of building permit for
the development project, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Fee Resolution, or developer
enters into a fee deferral agreement with the City. This section shall be applicable whether the
fees are paid in cash or a credit is used.
C. Basis for Calculating Fees for Projects not Covered in Fee Resolutions
The Fees for projects will be calculated as provided for in the Fee Resolutions. However, in
certain circumstances, the applicable resolutions may not appropriately reflect or apply to a
particular project. Examples of this situation could include, but not be limited to mixed use
projects or projects that involve land uses that are not included in the Resolution. In those
situations, the guidelines presented in this section will be applied.
For non-residential development projects in which the land use is not included in the definitions
contained in the applicable Fee Resolution, the Community Development Director will determine
which of the defined categories is appropriate, maintaining as much consistency as possible with
the definition of such terms.
For mixed-use development projects in all fee programs other than the Western Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee, the Community Development Director will determine the projected
percentage of each of the uses at the time the Final Map, other appropriate entitlement, or
building permit is approved. The Fee will be calculated on a pro-rata basis for each different use.
If the project contains both residential and non-residential portions, the Fee will be based upon
the residential per dwelling unit fee schedule for the residential po rtion and the non-residential
per square foot schedule for the non-residential portion. (Note that the Western Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee directly addresses the effects of mixed-use development.)
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 3
If the use(s) are unknown at the time of obtaining a building permit and the building permit does
not include adequate interior details to determine the intended use, the use for the initial fee
calculation purposes will be determined by the Community Development Director. Any Fee
discrepancy as a result of a different final use of the property will be calculated and reconciled at
the time that a building permit is issued for interior tenant improvements . Such reconciliation
may result in an additional Fee or a partial refund of previously paid Fee(s). This fee calculation
shall be at the rate in effect at the issuance of building permit.
Quasi-public uses (churches, non-profit organizations, etc.) shall be subject to the Fees. For these
uses, the Community Development Director will determine which of the categories most
appropriately reflects the land use and allocate the project to this category. Affordable housing
projects developed by government agencies and/or non-profit entities will be subject to the same
Fees that are assessed on private residential development.
Where the Fee in question is calculated based on trips generated, the Fee Schedule of the
applicable Approving Resolution for the Fee will define appropriate trip rates to be used for the
calculation of the Fees. If an applicant disagrees with the Fee calculated based on trips generated
by the proposed project per respective Fee program, including but not limited to quasi -public
uses, applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director, requesting that the City
undertake a specific traffic study for the purpose of determining the estimated trip generation of
the proposed development project. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with
the study.
If the Public Works Director determines that the land use of the proposed development project is
not appropriately reflected in the Fee Schedule to the Resolution or that the intensity of the
proposed land use is not consistent with the adopted land use categories in the Fee Schedule to
the Resolution, the Public Works Director will have the option of requiring a traffic analysis or
utilizing an existing relevant study for the purpose of determining the estimated trip generation of
the proposed development project. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with
the study.
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 4
IV. Payment Records
The Administrative Services Department will record the payment of the Fees. Records will be
maintained to comply with refunding requirements as prescribed by State Law. The
Administrative Services Department will obtain a mailing address from each payor, as well as the
applicable Assessor’s Parcel Number, and will note the payor as the entity or person whose name
appears as the applicant for the building permit. The Administrative Services Department will
maintain the records for a period of ten years from their collection , unless a legal mandate exists
for a longer retention.
V. Other Miscellaneous Administrative Guidelines
A. Refunds
Refunds of Fees associated with withdrawn applications or projects on which construction has not
commenced, will be done in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Dublin Municipal
Code Section 7.28.450.
If, pursuant to said procedures for paid building permits, a refund is no longer available, and if,
within 10 years of the original payment of the Fees, new building permits are issued for a project
on the subject property, the developer of the new project shall be required to pay only the
difference between the amount of the Fees that were originally paid, and the amount of the Fees
in effect at the time of issuance of building permits for the new project. This calculation of the
difference in Fee amounts shall be done on a Fee by Fee basis. Thus, if any one Fee is reduced or
eliminated between the time of the original payment and the issuance of building permits for the
new project, the original payment amount for that reduced or eliminated Fee shall not be included
in the calculation of the amount owed for the other Fees.
B. Annual Review of Fee Collection
The City has existing procedures for complying with State Law in regards to accounting for
developer Fees. The Administrative Services Department will maintain records to provide the
following items:
A brief description of the Fee;
An identification of the improvements and the percentage of cost of the improvements
which the Fee will be expended upon; and
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 5
For improvements which are funded and yet to be completed, an identification of an
expected date by which construction of the facilities will commence.
C. Funds and Accounting
The City will incorporate the following items into its accounting procedures, which are the
responsibility of the Administrative Services Department:
The City will maintain a separate fund for the collection and expenditure of Fees.
The City will allocate interest to Fees collected in the fund based upon month end cash
balances.
The City will identify, in accordance with State Law, the beginning and ending balance
of the funds held for the Fee as of fiscal year end.
The City will identify the amount of Fees collected and interest earned in each fiscal year
for Fees.
The City will provide a description and accounting of any inter-fund transfers made by
the Fee Fund.
The City will calculate reimbursements annually within 180 days of each fiscal year end.
The City will file an annual accounting of all development impact fees with the City
Council and for public inspection within 180 days of each fiscal year end.
D. Exemptions
1. Total Exemption. The following types of development will be exempt from the co llection of
Fees:
a) Any alteration or addition to a residential structure, except to the extent that a residential
unit (e.g., second dwelling unit) is added to a single-family unit, or another unit is added
to an existing multi-family building.
b) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing single-family residential structure that
has been destroyed or demolished. This exception shall not apply to the extent that the
replacement or reconstruction includes the addition of a residential unit (e.g., second
dwelling unit).
c) Any replacement or reconstruction of an existing multi-family residential structure
without changing the use type as a residential structure that is not part of a mixed used
development and that has been destroyed or demolished. This exception shall not apply to
the extent that the replacement or reconstruction increases the number of residential units
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 6
on the property.
d) Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee only. Some of the retail uses within the
Eastern Dublin Transit Center and the Fairway Ranch High-Density Residential
Development may be considered ancillary to the adjoining residential uses and therefore
may not generate outside vehicle trips. The Public Works Director shall provide the final
determination of land uses that could be considered ancillary. If a land use is found to be
not completely ancillary, an appropriate fee per trip will be charged in accordance with
the provisions of these guidelines.
e) The City Council, in its sole discretion, may waive the applicability of the Fee to certain
development constructed or to be constructed by a public entity on land having an
appropriate General Plan land use designation upon findings of the City Council that such
a waiver is in the interest of the public health, safety, and/or welfare, for reasons specified
in the findings.
f) Any alteration or addition to a non-residential building or structure resulting in a net
increase of no more than 500 square feet.
g) Any Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) that is less than 750 square feet in size per the
requirements of Assembly Bill 345.
2. Partial Exemption – Applicable only to Western Dublin and Eastern Dublin TIF
A partial exemption may be granted based on prior Fees paid as follows:
If after paying the Fees for a specific development project, the project is demolished and replaced
by a new type of development, an exemption may be given for up to the amount which was paid
by the prior development project. In the event that the replacement project would result in a lower
Fee, the new development shall not accrue any unused credit or reimbursement rights. Any
change in use outside of the establishment of the Fee program shall be obligated to pay the entire
Fee except to the extent that another exemption applies. Any Transportation Impact Fees will be
calculated using the procedures outlined in these Guidelines.
E. Administrative Fees
Developers will pay the City administrative fees, provided the fees are established in the City's
Master Fee Schedule, to cover the costs associated with:
The establishment of the credit/reimbursement agreement
Credit transfers
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 7
Annual credit/Right to Reimbursement maintenance and monitoring.
VI. Developer Fee Credits
This section applies only to the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, Eastern Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee, Public Facilities Fee, Fire Facilities Fee, Non-residential Affordable
Housing Impact Fee and the definitions contained in the Resolutions establishing and amending
said Fees shall apply. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the "Fee" or "Fees" in this
section shall mean only the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, Eastern Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee, Public Facilities Fee, Fire Facilities Fee, and Non-residential
Affordable Housing Impact Fee.
A. General
This section establishes the authority for providing credits and/or reimbursement to developers
who construct and/or dedicate any of the improvements and facilities for which the Fees are
imposed. When such public improvements and facilities are constructed and/or dedicated by a
developer, the developer shall be given a credit when appropriate to be applied against the Fees
due for the development project. The amount of the credit shall be determined pursuant to these
guidelines. If the amount of the credit is greater than the Fees due for the development project,
the developer may, subject to the restrictions described herein, use the credit toward the Fees for
another development project or transfer the credit to another eligible developer in accordance
with these guidelines. If the developer cannot use or transfer the credit within ten years, then the
credit will convert to a reimbursement right unless the developer first extends the credits as
provided for in Section VI.G of these Guidelines.
B. Fee Credit/Reimbursement Agreement Required
The allotment of fee credits and/or provision for a reimbursement will only occur in accordance
with a written credit/reimbursement agreement between the City and the developer responsible
for the construction of the Fee facilities or dedication of land.
1. All fee credits will be granted by use of a standard agreement approved by the City
Attorney.
2. This credit/reimbursement agreement will be entered into at the time the improvements
are secured and/or the right-of-way is accepted for dedication. The terms of this
agreement may, at the City's discretion, be included in the agreement entered into with
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 8
the City to secure certain public improvements as contained on a Final Parcel Map or
Final Subdivision Map.
3. Any credits, which are unused within ten years following their creation, pursuant to
Section VI.G.a of these Guidelines, shall convert to a right to reimbursement, unless the
developer first extends the credits as provided for in Section VI.G .b of these Guidelines.
4. Neither a credit nor the right to reimbursement shall either be increased for inflation or
accrue interest. The park land right to reimbursement amount shall be based on land
value at the time of dedication.
5. Credits are transferable, with the written approval of the City Manager, provided that the
administrative fee is paid, as specified in these guidelines.
6. The developer will sign the fee credit/reimbursement agreement attesting that it obtained
a copy of these administrative guidelines and they were read, understood, and accepted.
7. Prior to the 2021 Update, the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee distinguished
between Section I and Section II improvements and, therefore, credits earned by Section I
and Section II improvements could only be used to offset fees for that same category.
These distinctions were eliminated in the 2021 Update to the Eastern Dublin
Transportation Fee. After the effectiveness of the 2021 Update to the Eastern Dublin
Transportation Fee, any previously created credits that were denominated “Section I” or
“Section II” credits can be used to satisfy Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee
obligations for which credits can be used.
8. With respect to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, no fee credits shall be
established for the " Residential BART Garage Fee" (formerly known as “Section II
Residential BART Garage”) component of the Fee. Payments from those monies shall be
made in accordance with subsection VI.L below.
9. With respect to the Public Facilities Fee, the City Manager may approve the conversion
of credits from one park land category to another park land category based on the land
values conversion ratio, or may approve the conversation of credits from one park
improvement category to another park improvement category. Park land credits cannot
convert to park improvement credits nor can park improvement credits convert to park
land credits. Any such conversion shall require an amendment to the
credit/reimbursement agreement that documents the existing credits or a new
credit/reimbursement agreement, if the credits have not been documented. Requests for
conversion under this section must be made in writing and the decision to approve or
deny a request is made at the sole discretion of the City Manager. The City Manager shall
approve the conversion only if he or she finds that the conversion would not materially
change the Public Facilities Fee program's ability to deliver the acreage in each category
specified in the program. This provision does not apply to any other category in the
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 9
Public Facilities Fee program.
C. Calculating the Fee Credits
1. General
The fee credit/reimbursement agreement will identify the total credit for Fee
improvements/facilities constructed or land dedicated for a particular development
project. The contributed land or improvements must be the facilities described in the
applicable Fee Resolutions and/or any subsequent replacement resolutions. There must be
a minimum value of $50,000 in improvements and/or right of way dedicated before
credits will be allotted to a developer.
2. Determination of Value
The Public Works Director will determine the value of the contributed
improvements/facilities based upon improvement plans submitted by the developer and
approved by the City, which plans shall quantify the size of the Fee facilities to be
constructed or dedicated. It is recognized that, in some cases, the scope of construction or
dedication will not exactly match the Fee facilities shown in the exhibits to the Fee
Resolution.
The credits will be the lesser of the following: a) the estimated cost of the improvements
as noted in the Resolution and/or any subsequent replacement resolution; or b) the pro-
rated value of the improvement using the standard cost measurements in the Resolution
and/or any subsequent replacement resolution. The Fee credits cannot exceed the cost
estimates of the improvements in the most recent Fee study and resolution. In no case
shall the fee credits include facility financing costs. See Appendix A for illustrative
examples 1 through 6, which pertain to this section.
D. Use of Fee Credits
1. Credits expire when used or 10 years from the date of the credit/reimbursement
agreement, whichever occurs first.
2. Developer can request that a credit exists in perpetuity, with the exception of the Fire
Facilities Fee. To exercise this option, Developer must make a written request to the City
Manager or designee, and the credit will not be eligible to convert to a right to
reimbursement.
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 10
The value of the credits will be listed in the agreement and applied as credits to the Fees
as authorized by the developer. The City's Administrative Services Department will keep
record of credit utilization and balance.
3. Only the developer who builds or dedicates the Fee facilities will be entitled to the
original or initial credits, until such time as they may be transferred in accordance with
these guidelines.
E. Use of Fee Credits requires Completion of Facility or Performance Bonds
Fee credits cannot be used by the developer until the developer has either:
1. Dedicated the land or constructed improvements/facilities representing the credits to the
City; or
2. Provided the City with a performance bond and a labor and materials bond or other
adequate security to insure that the improvements will be constructed prior to the first
Certificate of Occupancy for any building that is part of the project. The performance
bond or other security shall be in an amount equal to 100% of the engineer's estimated
cost to construct the improvements and the labor and materials bond shall be written by a
surety licensed to conduct business in the State of California and approved by the City
Manager or designee. See Appendix A for illustrative example 7, which pertains to this
section.
F. Transferring of Credits
1. The original holder of credits can request a transfer of credits to a person owning an
interest in property that is subject to the same category of the Fee in question. Such
transactions shall be subject to an administrative fee, which shall cover the City's
administrative costs associated with the credit transfer. The administrative fee shall be
established in the City's Master Fee Schedule.
2. There is no limit on the number of times that credits can be transferred between
developments.
3. In certain circumstances, and as required in the interest of equity, the City Manager may,
at his or her sole discretion, authorize the transfer of credits to a person who does not own
an interest in property subject to the Fee.
G. Options At or Prior to Expiration of Credit Life
At or prior to expiration of the credit, the developer has the following options:
a) The expired unused fee credit shall automatically convert to a reimbursement right as
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 11
provided for under these guidelines, unless Developer submits a written request for
extension no more than six months prior and no less than three (3) months prior to the
credit expiration date or with City Manager's approval if the request passes the City's
required timeframe. The period for right to reimbursement extends ten (10) years from
the date of expiration.
b) As an alternative, Developer can request that credits, other than credits created under the
Fire Facilities Fee, exist in perpetuity and not convert to a right to reimbursement. To
exercise this option, Developer must make a request, in writing, no more than six months
prior and no less than three (3) months prior to credit expiration, or with City Manager's
approval if the request passes the City's required timeframe. Developer must secure a
written approval from the City Manager or designee for the request. Credits cannot be re -
converted to a right to reimbursement.
o Developers that have Fire Facilities Fee credits that would exist in perpetuity
may request that the credits be converted to a right to reimbursement with
approval, in writing, by the City Manager.
H. Reimbursement Rights (Excluding Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact
Fee Residential BART Garage Fees)
Reimbursement rights are created from the conversion of Fee credits, which occurs 10 years after
the initial date of the credit/reimbursement agreement, or after credit extension. Right to
reimbursement life is 10 years. Reimbursement rights are subject to the following specific
guidelines:
1. Reimbursement will only be from funds that were collected in payment of the same Fee
as the one for which a developer is seeking reimbursement.
2. The City will determine the amount of funds available for reimbursement on an annual
basis based on Fee programs, such as the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee and
Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, and the Public Facilities Fee programs.
I. Process for Reimbursement of Reimbursement Rights
1. Determination of Funds Available for Reimbursement
Within 180 days of the end of each fiscal year, the Administrative Services Department
will make an accounting of all Fees collected for the fiscal year that just ende d. The
Administrative Services Department will also determine, for each of the Fees, the amount
of Fee funds that are unspent and unplanned. The remaining funds (the reimbursement
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 12
set-aside) will be used to reimburse holders of reimbursement rights for facilities already
contributed, if any such reimbursement rights exist.
2. Allocating the Reimbursement Set-Aside to Outstanding Reimbursement Rights
In the event that the City designates that a reimbursement set-aside is available, 50% will
be used to pay the oldest reimbursement right outstanding. If the oldest right is paid off
before this portion of funds is entirely consumed, then the balance of the 50% will go
toward the next oldest right. This portion of reimbursement set -aside funds will be
allocated according to this method until it is exhausted. The other half of the
reimbursement set-aside will be allocated to all remaining reimbursement rights on a pro-
rata basis according to their amounts outstanding, including the remaining un-reimbursed
portion of the oldest agreement. Unused reimbursement set-aside funds will not be
carried over to another fiscal year. See Appendix A for illustrative example 7, which
pertains to this section.
This guideline does not apply to any Fire Facilities Fee reimbursement that was
converted from a credit in perpetuity. Upon such conversion, the City Manager shall
have the authority, in writing, to establish the right to reimbursement priorities for rights
of reimbursement.
J. Procedures for Construction of Designated Facilities by Developers
1. With respect to the Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee and the Eastern Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee, the improvements requested to be constructed or dedicated
must be submitted for approval in writing to the Public Works Director no later than 30
calendar days prior to the approval of the Final/Parcel Map on the development project.
Absent a Map, a letter must be submitted for approval prior to the approval of the
improvement agreement. The submittal of the improvement plans and/or description of
area to be dedicated shall be in sufficient detail, as determined by the Public Works
Director, for the Public Works Director to make a determination regarding the approval.
The developer constructing or dedicating improvements in lieu of paying a portion of the
Fee must post a performance bond before the issuance of any grading and/or building
permits for the construction of the improvements.
2. With respect to the Public Facilities Fee (PFF), developers may, with City approval, be
permitted to design and construct facilities included in the FF program. The design and
construction materials/methods must be in accordance with standard City specification s,
and City inspectors shall be responsible for construction inspection throughout the
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 13
duration of the construction period. The PFF Facilities to be constructed or dedicated by
the developer must be submitted for approval in writing to the Public Works Director no
later than 30 calendar days prior to the approval of the Final/Parcel Map or improvement
program on the development project. The submittal of the improvement plans and/or
description of area to be dedicated shall be in sufficient detail, including the layout of
timeline/milestones of the construction, as determined by the Public Works Director, for
the Public Works Director to make an informed determination regarding the approval.
The developer constructing or dedicating PFF Facilities in lieu of paying a portion of the
Fee must post a performance bond and a labor and materials bond before the issuance of
any grading and/or building permits for the construction of the PFF Facilities.
K. Guidelines for Issuing Trip Credits for Transportation Impact Fees
1. Trip credit shall be determined by the City based upon the adopted trip generation rates
as specified in the Fee program. See Appendix A for illustrative examples 8 through 11,
which pertain to this section.
2. Trip credits shall follow the land use and not the user. For example, assume User X
relocates from Space A to Space B, both of which are located within the Western Dublin
TIF area. User X shall not receive trip credit for vacating Space A. User X shall be
charged the appropriate TIF amount for moving into Space B, subject to receiving trip
credit as specified below. Similarly, the appropriate TIF amount shall be charged to the
next user of Space A, subject to the appropriate trip credit.
3. Trip credit associated with unoccupied space shall be issued if, and only if, the space has
been vacant for three (3) calendar years or less prior to the date when a use permit is
issued to the new user.
4. TIF calculations/trip credit for uses, other than Urgent Care Medical Office, located
within a general office building that houses multiple tenants (such as professional
services, insurance companies, investment brokers, bank or savings and loan institutions,
medical offices, restaurant or cafeteria, retail facilities, etc.) shall be based upon a
uniform trip generation rate for Standard Commercial Office as specified in the F ee
Program. For Urgent Care Medical Office use within a general office building, the trip
generation rate for Clinic, as specified in the Fee program, shall be used to calculate the
TIF and the trip credit.
5. Trip credit for uses located within a shopping center containing retail stores, as well as
non-merchandising facilities (such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post
offices, banks, health clubs, recreational facilities, etc.) shall be based upon a uniform trip
generation rate for the appropriate type of Shopping Center as specified in the Fee
program.
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 14
L. Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee- Residential BART Garage
1. Payment to Alameda County Surplus Property Authority (ACSPA) for $6 million of
BART Garage Costs (Residential BART Garage, formerly known as Section II
Residential BART Garage).
With respect to the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee, payment of Residential
BART Garage Fees, payment shall be made to the Alameda County Surplus Property
Authority (ACSPA), which is responsible for the parking garage construction and
dedication of the improvement to the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) District for public
use. Except for interest earned on Residential BART Garage fees prior to distribution, the
maximum amount to be paid to ACSPA shall not exceed $6,000,000 (six million dollars).
Payment to Alameda County Surplus Property Authority is subject to the following
specific guidelines:
a) The maximum to be disbursed from fees collected shall be six million dollars
($6,000,000), which amount shall not be increased for any reason including inflation. In
addition, any accrued interest pending disbursement shall be disbursed to ACSPA.
b) Disbursement will be only from the Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee
Residential BART Garage fee, and will not come from any other source including the
City's General Fund.
c) The amount disbursed will depend on the payment of fees by development subject to the
fee. There is no guarantee that ACSPA will receive a total of $6,000,000.
d) The City will determine and report on an annual basis to ACSPA, the amount of funds
collected from the Residential BART Garage fee and the amount available for
disbursement, including interest accrued prior to disbursement, if any.
e) The procedure for distributing the disbursements to ACSPA is described below.
2. Process for Payment to ACSPA - Residential BART Garage Fee Funds
a) Initial Distribution of Residential BART Garage Fee Funds
i. Once the BART Garage has been accepted by BART and made available for
public use, the ACSPA shall provide to the City a written certification of the
completion of the BART Garage.
ii. Within 45 days of receipt of the certification described above, City shall calculate
the balance of funds available in Residential BART Garage fee, as of the first day
of the month preceding the date of the notice. City shall also calculate and
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 15
account for accrued interest based on the quarterly balance of Residential BART
Garage Fees and the earning rate applied to pooled funds managed by the City.
City shall remit to ACSPA the funds as calculated along with a report showing
the maximum remaining fees that may be paid to ACSPA.
iii. Thereafter, funds shall be distributed on an annual basis as described below.
b) Annual Determination of Residential BART Garage Fee Funds Available for Payment
i. Within 180 days of the end of each fiscal year, the Administrative Services
Department will make an accounting of all Residential BART Garage fees
collected, and not previously disbursed, for the fiscal year that just ended. This
shall include accrued interest.
ii. The City shall distribute to ACSPA, Residential BART Garage fees available, to
the extent that the total distribution including previous payments, excluding any
amounts paid as interest, does not exceed the maximum amount described above.
iii. The Administrative Services Department shall annually report to the ACSPA the
current balance remaining in Residential BART Garage fees that may be paid.
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 16
Appendix A: Illustrative Examples
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 17
Illustrative Example 1 (Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee or Western Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee): Assume that a developer dedicates land for the partial widening of a
major street to offset the Fees due from a development project. To qualify for a credit, this
roadway widening project must be included in the relevant Transportation Impact Fee program.
The land dedication to be applied for a Fee credit shall not include improvements immediately
adjacent to the development project, as these improvements are entirely the responsibility of the
developer and are not to be funded by the Fee. To qualify for a credit for the improvements
immediately adjacent to the development project, these improvements must be included in the
relevant fee program. The Resolution used a standard cost measurement on the current value per
square foot for right-of-way dedication in calculating the TIF. The Fee credits due to the
developer can be calculated by determining the square footage of the land to be dedicated
multiplied by the proper square foot cost measurement after automatic annual adjustments based
on the change in land acquisition costs.
Illustrative Example 2 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee): A Developer constructing
multi-family homes contributes traffic signal improvements (TIF improvement) valued at
$200,000. Assume that the Fee at the time totals $2,497 per dwelling unit. The credit of $200,000
will cover approximately 80.10 dwelling units. When the building permit is issued for the 81st
dwelling unit, the developer will have used up the credit and will have to begin paying the Fee.
Illustrative Example 3 (Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee): A developer constructing
single family homes has a fee credit of $200,000 from previous construction of improvements
that were part of the prior Section I EDTIF program. The EDTIF program no longer makes a
distinction between Section I and Section II improvements. The fee credits can be used to offset
the developer’s future EDTIF obligations. Assume that the EDTIF at the time totals $13,613 per
home. The credit of $200,000 can be used against the developer's EDTIF obligation and will
cover approximately 14.69 homes. When the building permit is issued for the 15th home, the
developer will have used up the credit and will have to begin paying the EDTIF.
Illustrative Example 4 (Public Facilities Fee): Assume that a developer improves 10 acres of
land for a planned 20-acre community park to offset the Fees due for the Community Parks
Improvement fee component. The last adopted fee study used a standard cost estimate of
$420,000 per acre for calculating the cost of improved community parkland. The fee credit due to
the developer will be calculated using this cost estimate (10 acres, $420,000 per acre =
$4,200,000).
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 18
Illustrative Example 5 (Public Facilities Fee): A developer constructing single family homes in
Dublin contributes neighborhood park improvements valued at $200,000. The Neighborhood
Parks Improvements portion of the Fee for a single family home is $2,280 of the total Fee of
$32,643. The developer must pay a Fee of $30,363 for each single-family home (total Fee of
$32,643 less credit of $2,280) until the $200,000 credit is used up. This credit will cover the
Neighborhood Parks, Improvements component of the Fee for the first 87 single -family homes
constructed ($200,000/$2,280 = 87.72). When the developer applies for the building permit for
the 88th home, he or she will begin paying this component of the Fee with the balance of the
Public Facilities Fee due for the project.
Illustrative Example 6 (Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee or Western Dublin
Transportation Impact Fee): A developer is constructing certain street improvements, which will
be dedicated to the City to offset a portion of the Fee. The improvements are a project in Fee
Program. The developer supplies the City with a right-of-way conveyance, a performance bond
and a labor and materials bond for the completion of the street improvements. Fee credits can be
used in advance of completing the improvements, since the City is assured that the land will be
dedicated and the improvements will be completed.
Illustrative Example 7 (Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee): During one fiscal year, the
City collects $88,000 in Fees for Eastern Dublin TIF improvements. The total outstanding
reimbursements owed for the Eastern Dublin TIF are $100,000 to the following developers:
Developer A (the oldest agreement): $50,000
Developer B: $20,000
Developer C: $30,000
For the upcoming fiscal year, the City retains $44,000 for improvements not built by developers
and allocates $44,000 as the reimbursement set-aside to reduce current reimbursement
obligations. $22,000 (50% of the $44,000) of the reimbursement set-aside is used to pay
Developer A, who holds the oldest agreement. Developer A now has $28,000 of outstanding
reimbursements (beginning balance of $50,000 less the $22,000 payment). The other half of the
reimbursement set-aside ($22,000) is allocated proportionally to all three parties who currently
hold reimbursement rights as follows:
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 19
Holder of
Reimbursement
Current Value of
Reimbursement
Owed
Percent of Total
Reimbursements
Outstanding
Amt. of $22,000
Reimbursement
Distributed
Reimbursement
Balance
Remaining
Developer A $28,000 35.90% $7,898.00 $20,102.00
Developer B $20,000 25.64% $5,640.80 $14,359.20
Developer C $30,000 38.46% $8,461.20 $21,538.80
TOTAL $78,000 $22,000.00 $56,000.00
Illustrative Example 8 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee): User X moves his/her fast
food restaurant business into an individual (standalone) building located within the Western
Dublin TIF area. Previous use of the building consisted of a sit -down restaurant, which was
vacated approximately two years prior to User X obtaining his/her use permit. Would User X be
entitled to trip credit?
Answer: Yes, because the previous use was vacated only two years before he/she would be
entitled to trip credit for the previous sit-down restaurant use which generates fewer trips than a
fast food restaurant. User X would pay TIF based on the net trips estimated for his/her project.
Illustrative Example 9 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee): User X (insurance company
office) and User Y (dental office) occupy office space in two separate general office buildings
(building A and building B, respectively). Both buildings are located within the Western Dublin
TIF area. The two users have decided to switch office spaces (e.g., User X would relocate to the
space in building B and User Y would relocate to the space in building A). Would either user be
required to pay TIF?
Answer: No, because as each user moves into the other space, he/she would receive full trip credit
for the previous use, based on the uniform trip generation rate for Standard Commercial Office as
specified in the Fee program. Note: Although User Y operates a dental office, which generates
more trips than an insurance company office (User X), the same trip generation rate (i.e.,
Standard Commercial Office) is used in both cases to calculate the TIF, as both uses are proposed
to take place within a general office building.
Illustrative Example 10 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee): User X proposes to
change the use of his/her individual (standalone) space within the Western Dublin TIF area from
Health Club to Bowling Center/Video Arcade. How would the TIF be determined?
Answer: The TIF would be determined based on the net change in trips estimated for the
proposed project. For example, User X would be charged TIF based on the proposed Bowling
City of Dublin Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative Guidelines – December 2021 Page 20
Center/Video Arcade use, but would receive trip credit for the discontinued Health Club use.
Illustrative Example 11 (Western Dublin Transportation Impact Fee): User X proposes to
establish an Urgent Care Medical Office within a general office building by replacing existing
retail/restaurant uses located on the first floor of the building. How would the trip credit be
determined?
Answer: The trip credit would be determined based on the trip generation rate for Standard
Commercial Office. Note: The TIF would be based upon the increase in trips due to the proposed
project (e.g., the difference between Clinic trips and Standard Commercial Office trips).