HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.4 MAD 97-1 Petition Frmtn CITY CLERK
File # a (0
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 23, 1996
SUBJECT: Petition Requesting Formation of Landscaping and Lighting
Maintenance Assessment District 97-1
Report Prepared by: Public Works Director Lee Thompson
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Resolution Initiating Proceedings
2) Petition, including Engineer's Report and Diagram
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution initiating proceedings
.. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: No assessments are proposed for FY 1996-97. The estimated
assessment for FY 1997-98 is $39,411, or$460.40 per acre(based
on 85.6 acres), depending on the extent of landscaping that is
installed for that year. Additional financial information is provided
in the Description below. Assessments are subject to review and
approval of the City Council on an annual basis through the required
public hearing process.
DESCRIPTION: _The Development Agreement between the City,the Surplus Property
Authority of Alameda County, and Kaufman&Broad (K&B)for the California Creekside residential
project provides that the Surplus Property Authority and K&B will take action to assure that the cost of
_ maintenance of street and creek landscaping is paid by the individual lot owners (Development
Agreement,Exhibit B,page xii.),
One of the mechanisms identified in the Development Agreement is a Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District. The Development Agreement further provides that, consistent with the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan,the Surplus Property Authority will take action to assure that purchasers of any
remaining portions of the of the Santa Rita property will pay their proportionate share of maintenance
costs for street and creek landscaping.
Pursuant to these provisions of the Development Agreement,the Surplus Property Authority and K&B
have proposed the formation of a Landscape and Lighting Assessment District covering the entire Santa
Rita property as the selected mechanism.
COPIES TO: Pat Cashman,Alameda Co.
Steve Hicks,K&B O
Joseph Azar,Ruggeri-Jensen
ITEM NO.
\assessdist\97-1\agstI1 1u 1
The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority has,therefore, submitted a petition to form an
assessment district to fund street landscape maintenance and utility costs for the Santa Rita development
area. This area is bounded by Arnold(Sebille) Road on the west, Gleason Drive on the north, Tassajara
Road on the east, and Dublin Boulevard on the south, as shown on the assessment diagram included with
Exhibit 2.
The scope of work includes maintenance of roadside landscaping for Dublin Boulevard, Hacienda
Drive,the"transit spine," a portion of Arnold (Sebille)Road, and a portion of Gleason Drive, plus the
maintenance of the trail and landscaping along the Tassajara Creek channel, as delineated in the scope of
LK
work on Page 1 and 2 of the petition.
2
At this time,the Surplus Property Authority is the only property owner within the proposed area of
assessment. As various properties-are sold and developed,the new property owners would be assessed
according to the formula set forth in the petition and Engineer's Report. It is proposed that the cost of
• maintenance be spread equally among the property owners on a per-acre basis. In the case of single-
family or multi-family residential developments,the assessment would be based on the total acreage of
the development, divided equally among the single-family or multi-family housing units. (If a residential
development contains both single- and multi-family units,the proportion between the two housing types
may be different, based on their relative areas divided by the number of units for each density category.)
The estimated assessment for the 1997-98 fiscal year is $39,411, or$460.40 per acre, based on 85.6 acres
• anticipated to be developed at that time. The ultimate assessment at buildout is estimated to be $317,756,
. or$710 per acre, based on 447.6 acres, and based on 1996-97 unit costs.
The petition further specifies that the maximum developed acre assessment will be increased annually by
the percentage of increase of the Consumer Price Index (San Francisco Bay Area Urban Wage Earners),
45. insofar as non-utility costs are concerned. Any actual increase in utility costs will also be passed on to the
• properties as part of the assessment.
Any costs in excess of the total maximum allowable assessment of developed properties would be
assessed to the Surplus Property Authority's remaining undeveloped property.
The petition proposes a formula for calculating the assessment at buildout of the Santa Rita property. As
such, once the initial assessment is levied, it will merely be necessary for the Council to annually
determine the amount of the assessment by applying the formula.
The schedule for formation of this assessment district provides that Staff will return to the City Council at
the August 13th meeting with a proposed resolution for formation of the District, and that public hearings
will be held on September 10th and October 8th. There will be no assessment for Fiscal Year 1996-97.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution initiating proceedings for Landscaping and
Lighting Assessment District No. 97-1.
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. - 96
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 97-1
(SANTA RITA AREA)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin proposes to form an assessment district
pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section 22500 and following, Streets and
Highways Code) for the purpose of the following improvements (hereinafter"Improvements"):
The maintenance and repair of landscaped and open space areas, entry features, entry lighting,
masonry soundwalls,wrought iron fences, common area drainage ditches, irrigation systems,trees
and plantings,furnishing of water and power for irrigation systems, sidewalks and pathways,
r�r=. 2 together with all appurtenant and incidental expenses within-the-Alameda County Surplus Property
Authority property, City of Dublin, for the following areas:
A. The northerly and southerly street frontages for Dublin Boulevard from Sebille Road
(Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road.
B. The northerly and southerly street frontages for Central Parkway from Sebille Road
(Arnold Road)to Tassajara Road, excluding the future school frontage landscaping.
C. The southerly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Sebille Road(Arnold Road)
to Tassajara and the nor therly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Tassajara Creek to
Tassajara Road.
D. _ :The easterly street frontage for Sebille Road(Arnold Road)from Dublin Boulevard to
Gleason Drive.
E. The easterly and westerly street frontages for Hacienda Drive from Hacienda Interchange
to Gleason Drive.
F. The westerly street frontage of Tassajara Road 350 feet southerly of Tassajara Road and
Dublin Boulevard intersection to 450 feet northerly of the Gleason Drive and Tassajara
Road intersection.
G. Tassajara Creek from I-580 to the northerly boundary of the Alameda County property.
WHEREAS, the proposed assessment district shall be designated Lighting and Landscape
Maintenance District No. 97-1, Dublin,Alameda County, California, and shall include the land shown on
the map designated"Assessment Diagram, Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District No. 97-1, City
of Dublin,Alameda County, California,"which map is on file with the City Clerk and is hereby approved.
Page 1 .':
kkezi1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designed Engineer for
the purpose of these formation proceedings and that the City Council hereby directs the Engineer to
prepare and file with the City Clerk a report in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Landscaping
and Lighting Act of 1972.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of July, 1996.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
assessdist197-1\resofrm 1
Page 2
LANDOWNER PETITION & CONSENT TO
FORMATION OF MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 97-1
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
LANDOWNER PETITION & CONSENT TO
FORMATION OF MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 97-1
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting act of 1972)
1. The undersigned are the owners of the lands as shown in the
Engineers' report attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof.
2. -• The undersigned hereby requests and consents to the
formation of a maintenance district pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972 (Sections 22500 and following, California Streets and Highways
Code) for the purpose of providing the following improvements:
The maintenance and repair of landscaped and open space areas,
entry features, entry lighting, masonry soundwalls, wrought.iron
f ' fences,:common area drainage ditches; irrigation systems,trees and
plantings, furnishing of-water and power for irrigation systems,
sidewalks and pathways, together with all appurtenant and
incidental expenses with the Surplus Property of Alameda County,
City of Dublin for the following areas:
A. The northerly and southerly street frontages for Dublin _
Boulevard from Sebille Road (Arnold Road) to Tassajara
Road.
t B.:.- The northerly and southerly street frontages for Central
Parkway from-Sebille Road (Arnold Road) to Tassajara
r
Road excluding the future school frontage landscaping.
}
C. :. The southerly street frontage.for Gleason Drive from Sebille
Road (Arnold Road).to Tassajara Road and the northerly
street frontage for Gleason Drive from Tassajara Creek to
Tassajara Road.
D. The easterly .street frontage for Sebille Road
(Arnold Road) from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason
Drive.
E. The easterly and westerly street frontages for
Hacienda Drive from the 1-580/'Hacienda interchange to
Gleason Drive.
F. The westerly street frontage of Tassajara Road 350 feet
southerly of the Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard
Page 2
• 1
G. Tassajara Creek from 1-580 to the northerly property
boundary of the Surplus Property Authority of Alameda
County.
3. The undersigned hereby requests and consent to the following
method of spread of assessments:
The maximum developed acre assessment fee will be $710 per year.
The actual cost of the Improvements will be divided equally among the total number
of developed properties within the boundaries of the District on a per acre basis.
Total actual cost of assessment of developed acreage (areas that have been
subdivided) for that year shall be spread based on the following:
= A. Actual cost to maintain the landscaped area installed by developed
properties relative to the total cost to maintain the landscaping
within the District.
B. Total amount of developed acreage.
C. Developed acreage total actual cost of assessment for that year
shall be spread based on the following:
1) `' Commercial developed area, per acre basis.
2) Single-family residential area, per acre basis.
3) .Multi-family residential area, per acre basis. :.-
D. The single-family and multifamily residential area per acre
= assessment cost will be spread on a per unit basis based on the
approved development plan for each particular development.
E. The Surplus Property Authority of Alameda County remaining
undeveloped property shall be assessed the "difference" between
the total maximum.assessment of the developed properties and the
actual required cost of maintenance for that year.
F. The maximum developed acre assessment of$710 per year, will be
increased annually by the percentage increase in the Bay area
Urban Wage Earner Price Index (applies to all costs except water
and electricity), plus any actual increase in the cost for water and
electricity.
G. If the square footage cost of the Improvements will be less than the
amount set forth herein (after adjustment in accordance with
Page 3
•
Paragraph F), the assessment shall be reduced proportionately to
reflect the reduced cost of Improvements in that year. _
The cost of Improvements and the total square footage of the Improvements are
• taken from Part B of the Engineer's Report. The following is an•example calculation
for a first year and second year assessment scenarios:
SAMPLE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
•
1. FIRST YEAR
A. ASSUMPTIONS
Constructed Landscape Area 50,000 S.F.
Constructed Creek Area 0 S.F.
Maintenance Cost per Square Foot $0.50
Developed Area: 15 acres (Subdivision "A"
100`'Single=Family Lots
5 acres (Subdivision "B"
70 Multi-Family Lots
20 acres Commercial
40 acres total
B. ASSESSMENT CALCULATION:
Total Landscape Maintenance Cost=$0.50 x 50,000 &F:=$25,000
Assessment.per.Developed Acre=$25,000140 Acres=$625 per acre
- Subdivision•!`lk"-Assessment=15-Acres-x $625/Acre=$9,375
Subdivision "A"_.Assessment per lot=$9,375/100=$93.75 per lot
Subdivision "B" Assessment=5 Acres x $625/Acre=$3,125
Subdivision "B" Assessment per unit=$3,125/70 lot=$44.64 per lot
Commercial Assessment=$526.00 per acre
Undeveloped Property Assessment=$0 per acre
Page 4
• i
2. SECOND YEAR
A. ASSUMPTIONS:
Constructed Landscape Area 70,000 SF
Constructed Creek Area: 400,000 S.F.
Maintenance Cost per Square Foot
for landscaped area $0.40
Maintenance Cost per Square Foot
for creek area $0.08
Developed Area: 15 Acres (Subdivision "A"
100 Single-Family
Detached Lots
5 Acres (Subdivision "B")
70 Multi-Family Lots)
8 Acres (Subdivision "C"
64 Single-Family Lots
7=Acres (Subdivision "D"
140 Multi-Family Lots
20 Acres Commercial
55 Acres Total
Undeveloped Area 410 Acres
Cost of Living Increase: .. 3% Over Year One
Water Cost Increase 3% Over Year One
Electrical Cost Increase 3% Over Year One
B. ASSESSMENT CALCULATION:
Maximum Allowable Assessment=Year One Maximum Assessment+
Electrical, Water, & Cost of Living Increases
=$710.00 +$21.30=$731.30/Acre
Total Max. Allowable Assessment=Max. Assessment x Devel.
Acres =$731.30/Acre x 55 Acres=$40,221.50
Maintenance Cost=Landscape Area Cost+ Creek Cost
=70,000 x $0.40 + 400,000 x $0.08=$60,000
Undeveloped Property Assessment=Maintenance Cost- Max.
Allow Assessment =$60,000 - $40,221.50=$19,778.50
Undeveloped Property Assessment Per Acre=$19,778.50/410
Acres =$48.24/Acre
Assessment per Developed Acre=Max. Assessment=$731.30 per
Acre
Page 5
1
Subdivision "A" Assessment= 15 Acres x
$731.30/Acre= $10,969.50
Subdivision "A" Assessment per Lot= $10,969.50/100=$109.70 per Lot
Subdivision "B" Assessment=5 Acres x $731.30/Acre= $3,656.50
Subdivision "B" Assessment per Lot= $3,656.50/70= $52.24 per Lot
Subdivision "C" Assessment= 8 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$ 5,850.40
Subdivision "C" Assessment per Lot=$ 5,850.40/64= $ 91.41 per Lot
Subdivision "D" Assessment= 7 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$ 5,119.10
Subdivision "D" Assessment per Lot=$ 5,119.10/140=$ 36.57 per Lot
f.
•
Commercial Assessment= $731.30/Acre
4. The undersigned hereby waive the notice of public hearing otherwise
required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 for the formation of the
maintenance district and the adoption of the first annual budget, and the undersigned
further consent to the approval by the City Council of the City of Dublin Engineer's
Report attached hereto.
NAME AND ADDRESS _ • DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Surplus Property Authority. - portion of Parcel 1 as said
• of Alameda County parcel is described in the deed
• 224 W. Winton Ave., Rm 151 - recorded July 11, . 1969 in
Hayward, CA 94544 _ reel 2439 at image 213,Alameda
'County, California.
By: i�J / /[ /Ji/,
ITS: 7 • r
• `��/� Dated: /
Page 6
f
ENGINEER'S REPORT
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 97-1
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City
Council.
DATED:
Engineer of Work
By:
I,the City Clerk of'-the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the
foregoing Engineer's Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in
Part B, with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the
, 199 .
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin;.California, hereby certify that the
foregoing-AsSe ment, with the diagram'-thereto attached,`wa&preliminarily
approved and confirmed by the City-Council of said-City by its Resolution No.
duly adopted by said Council on the , 199 .
I, the City-Clerk=of the"City of Dublin 'California, hereby certify that the.` -
foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved
and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. , duly
adopted by said Council on the , 199 .
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the
foregoing Assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the County Auditor
of the County of Alameda, California on' , 199 .
Page 1
•
9
ENGINEER'S REPORT
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 97-1
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
LEE THOMPSON, City Engineer of the City of Dublin and Engineer of
Work for Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District, City of Dublin, Alameda
County, California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant
to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972).
The total assessment District area shall be 447.6 acres as shown in Part F
(the Assessment Diagram) of this report.
t._
The Ultimate Improvements w hich are the subject of this report are briefly
described as follows (hereinafter "Improvements"):
The maintenance and repair of landscaped and open space areas,
entry features, entry lighting, masonry soundwalls, wrought iron
fences, common area drainage ditches, irrigation systems, trees
and plantings, furnishing of water and power for irrigation systems,
together with all appurtenant and incidental expenses within the Surplus Property Authority of Alameda County,lands, City of Dublin
for the following.areas
1.
The-northerly and southerly street frontages for Dublin
Boulevard from Sebille Road (Arnold Road) to Tassajara Road.
2. The northerly and southerly street frontages for Central
Parkway from Sebille Road.(Arnold.Road) to.Tassajara Road excluding the
future school frontage landscaping.
3. The southerly street frontage for Gleason Drive from Sebille
Road (Arnold Road) to Tassajara Road and the northerly street frontage for
Gleason Drive from Tassajara Creek to Tassajara Road.
4. The easterly street frontage for Sebille Road (Arnold Road)
from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive.
5. The easterly and westerly street frontages for Hacienda Drive
from the I-580/Hacienda interchange to Gleason Drive.
Page 2
/D
•
6. The westerly street frontage of Tassajara Road 350 feet
southerly of Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard intersection to 450' northerly
of the Gleason Drive and Tassajara Road intersection.
7. Tassajara Creek from 1-580 to the northerly property boundary
of the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority property.
8. Street median landscapings are not part of this Lighting and
Landscape Maintenance District.
This report consists of six parts, as follows:
PART A - Site plan and street cross sections.
PART B - An Estimate of the annual maintenance costs of the ultimate
Improvements.
PART C - An assessment of the estimated cost of the Improvement on
each benefitted parcel of land within the assessment district.
PART D - A statement of the method by which the undersigned has
determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.
PART E - A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property
within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll
for taxes, or as known to the Clerk.
PART F A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this
assessment district.
Respectfully submitted,
LEE THOMPSON
Engineer of Work
Page 3
//
PART A
SITE PLAN AND STREET CROSS SECTIONS
•
•
ti.
Page 4
/r
3S
. .
142' RW ■., .'; ';: ' ; : *
110' R/W
20' 44' 14' 44' 20' „ I
30'
7 5 5 8' 12. 1 12' I 12' ; I 12' 12 12' 8' 8' I , , (REQUIRED FOR 28 . 52'
1S1 1 — —4 SW CHANNEL R/W)2 40' 1 10'
..,
4' 4. 24'
6
----b----.--------•-•4 1 e----_____ , ' 12' 12' I 8' _i _5' SW DUBLIN BLVD.
,.
, —
(ARNOLD ROAD TO HACIENDA DRIVE & TASSAJARA CREEK TO TASSAJARA ROAD)
N.T.S. ), ARNOLD ROAD
..,
• ' (FROM DUBLIN BLVD. TO GLEASON DRIVE)
148' R/W
I71' I 77' I . N.T.S.
15' 8' i 12' 12' 12' 211, 12' 12' 12'. 1 5'1 12' 12'
5' 1.....,,55W
.: . ::......, .
102' R/41
-----1
I f' 12 32' 14' 1 32 12'
• -1. ' ''
DUBLIN BLVD. • •
. 8' 12' 12' I 12' 1 12' a'
(FROM HACIENDA DR. TO COLLECTOR ROAD "A"), :' 5' SW I_
- I
N.T.S.
162' RW HACIENDA DRIVE
.12.-.35 24
' 44'TO 46' ' i -151- '' .: ::: : ;.,- „
1281K( 8' I 12 12' '7: 1 ,-'-•5' SW,' ' ';,-, ,., ; . (FROM ROUTE 580 TO GLEASON DRIVE)
PAM 4•3 . ■ N.T.S.
----- .444-1.„ ..1-'-'0 """, .!;..;:',-',..,,;:-.$. r•••'' ... . , •' '
: • ,i , 68'
DUBLIN BLVD. : - ,,
, v.. ). •, . 10' 20' R' 20 10';
102 R/W
(FROM COLLECTOR ROAD "A" TO TASSAJARA CREEK) ! :
l' ' 4' SW rall all 4' s'vi 12 32 32
ill' I
32' 12'
'
12' I 12' i 12' 1 8'
_1 _5' SW
WSW— [— 1
• ' ' '' ICE ' ' ' '' COLLECTOR ROAD : .II All ---L. I- I
11----
\ 84' R/w (DUBLIN BLVD TO TRANSIT SPINE)
w r . 24' 14' 24' 8' W N.TS.
GLEASON DRIVE
sw RittiND
I
PROPERTY sw BEHIND ', 2,, (ARNOLD ROAD TO TASSAJARA ROAD)
LINE N • If PROPERTY LINE
1 .-^ N.T.S.
--b----------4 I 'k, ,_,
CENTRAL PARKWAY , H. .
142.R/W ' - -- -- ---
(ARNOLD ROAD TO HACIENDA DRIVE) .. ', ::
20' 1 44' '14' 44' 20'
N.T.S. W 12' 12' 12' I ' 12' I 12' I 12' I 8' .
5'Sw . I 5' SW
--
, ; : 's !;':: • .-.
106'R/W .
20' 24' 20' 10 28' ",i i ;• ,
- i5' 15% TASSAJARA ROAD •
14' SW , , '1' . , (FROM ROUTE 580 TO DUBLIN BLVD.)
I 5' SW '!
INIM•■•■.mei, 01111.00MMINO N.T.S. R uggerl -
SANTA RITA. PROPERTY a'Itensen and
- 'Associates
CENTRAL PARKWAY LIGHTING AND MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
•• A &linos... . • aunvarona 1
6601 OWENS •
DRIVE SUITE 155 • PLEASANTON.CA 94589
(HACIENDA DRIVE TO TASSAJARA ROAD) - DATE: JULY 5, 1996 JOB NO.: 961069 PHONE(510) 227-9100 • FAX(510) 227-9300
!WIWI
. —
.•''vp F.,0.4,14,'',,,,q.t.:1,pm,,k:.);,..,.•'•,;'„"ev,!.,..,..n...,7,310,,,....,, ..• ,,. 1,■•,*trt45...,:11,''A'y',4.,V,-;,,,,,r,•57r.',,,,,,,,•,,,',.,!,ii^;„'"..11.,`,..:?...,-,',"', ,;-0''/..,,T,, ,,..,.... ,..4it.,,ii.7.,:..!,!,'s', V■ p •■,...•
... ' ':4!::•l'..,k•.':.t■.i.:.;' ...., . ','. .L. , .•
. .
' I
:L.., ," , ,
..---:
GLEASON ','4 , ,,,,,.',r,“,•,.!.b:;DRIVE ., —
-A :r.,,,,4.,•..„,,,.„ ; .. ,
, , .,.
...■•..=- ii
I •'•••;•; ;,;•;•:,... •;•::::•:•:••••;,;•••::.....:::.:::......;;.;. , ,
1450
: '. MO' i.'i: : •'' ', .,
' ' .1';',:;, in.‘,,...111111■Iir
.'..■11 ----
1 SF. DETACHED
1600' s3 ii '
•■•il A
il
_.._ ____. ...,:.::::.,..........::::,..........:„.:.:.........,
:,.....
,.;„ .,_
__.--
=,_-_-= 1700' :1
• • 'al; I < '- '111--- __.----,====.
COMMERCIAL OW il
,/
• ii
&___.--.=/____.___.=-- • :',i;:;:::::::;:;:iiiiiiiii:■ ,
i•l: ;b: I; I 7 iiii ; ,,,,.•„_-=- ._----•
%____-_-=--,=1,i) .
::::
_—_,-:-=-:- 1p.
=_-_ _=...._ .... :Ili - 4
:XI ,.... ii 11I,1,4! iiii :3•.! swat .-.- ..:, .___
. • ii
1
.: ., , „..,.
'Lis:
-. .-.1-.-=-" i!iiiCOMIERCIAL
1450' .:: :;isi
=---1=------ CENTRAL PARKWAY ..
• (TRANSIWPINE)
'.:______*_:.___ .:._ .,, :..,.. ii• I i J00.;Ili ' 459.:.... 800' •--___,,=----
600' .• ; - — -:.--- ,-...--..-
1 1::::::::.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.::::::.:.:::.::.;.;:,.:.,..-::-.........;......':-....,•:•:;::: :::•_:•:.:•:.:.::_:::••: ,-•. . ___ ________________.•_
•, ::;: 500'
__ <
7.:_‘_:.
• : 1 .: i; :: ii;•::.:,.• . .: :. <
;:
.' /53°g. li:3 MItil-FAMIL r
:ii: SI: DEMCHED I • , •• :i
SE. DEFAChEV • :::::
. .
...- li. .• ..
man-rAmar ii ii iiii _. -.--. .-- ... .4. .
1400' :: .: • : . , :: , ;:i:
:::; %-------•- --_--
- ---- ..._-
:.•
:::: F ..
..... ___ ___
/660. .._ =_.
•1 ____________ , __ ERIBUIL.________
1400 ii I •:;:
2400 , '- -ARO__
------—-
''';;;;;;:.:1.;;;;;;;;......,..... •..........: •.•••;• ; • • ;•;•..:..1.:••.:
I •• E.-... ,--,...-
;„
'::al E....,J I.—:"..= il
Ei: li i ii 4, ..?,.. _-,....
R_.-;,_=_
COMMERCIAL ' ':iii i- COMMERCIAL ...=.--.-.,=-
COMMERCIAL
.• . -_ -_-_,
__.--- _
.......L !---•-• ---
; • ATE-- E--
±----7-,1.------- ,
H.;-.-_--- •
= ...-
10011WAY ROUTE 550 ,i
[
' SANTA RITA PROPERTY Ruggeri n-
, iense and
LIGHTING AND MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
DAIE: JULY 5, 1996 JOG NO.: 951069
6601 OWENS DRIVE SUITE 155 • PLEASANTON.CA 94568
• PHONE(510)227-9100 • FAX(510) 227-9300
*any:
. ,
' ,..
k -
..,..
•
•
PART B
AN ESTIMATE OF THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST
OF THE ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENT
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 97-1
CITY OF DUBLIN
The budget for the Ultimate Improvement shall be $317,756/YR.
•
It is estimated that the budget for the fiscal year 1997/98 will be in the amount of
$39,411, but the budget for the fiscal year 1997/98 shall be set at a public hearing.
A. Landscaped Areas (maintenance)
1997-1998 Ultimate 1997-1998 1997-1998 Ultimate Ultimate
Maintenance Mainatenance Base Unit Maintenance Base Unit Maintenance
Areas Areas Cost/SF Cost/YR Cost/SF Cost/YR
1. Dublin Boulevard Area (51,800 SF) (189,100 SF) $0.30 $15,540 $0.30 $56,730
2. Central Parkway Area (9,100 SF) (53,700 SF) $0.30 $2,730 $0.30 $16,110
3. Gleason Drive Area (0.00 SF) (48,100 SF) $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $14,430
4. Arnold Road Area (0.00 SF) (11,600 SF) $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $3,480
5..Hacienda Drive Area . (6,300 SF) (42,100 SF) .$0.30 ,. $1,890 $0.30 $12,630
6 Tassajara Road Area (0.00 SF) (44,800 SF) r,$0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $13,440
1 Total Area 67,20D SF 389,400 SF $20,160/YR $116,820/YR :-
B.Tassajara Creek
1r 1. Trail Maintenance `= -` (0.00 SF)' (45,000 SF) .: '`$0.06 = $0.00/YR $0.06 $2,700/YR
Tic 2:"a Creek Landscape I . :; (0:00 SF) :(895,000 SF):` '$0.08 :_. : .,s $000/YR 50.08 $71,600/YR
3. Trall.Connections 1 (0.00 SF) - •(17,000 SF);";--, $0.36 40.00/YR -.-$0.36 $6,120/YR
$80,420/YR. - ---
C. Soundwalls
1. Repair and Maintenance (1,600 LF) (7,100 LF) $6,400/YR $28,400/YR
D. Dublin Boulevard Trail (46,800 SF) $0.06 $2,808/YR
E. Sidewalk
1. Dublin Boulevard Area (30,300 SF) $0.05 $1,515
2. Central Parkway Area (56,500 SF) $0.05 $2,825
3. Gleason Drive Area (37,000 SF) $0.05 $1,850
4. Arnold Road Area (12,800 SF) $0.05 $640
5. Hacienda Area (32,350 SF) $0.05 $16,175
6. Tassajara Area (15,450 SF) $0.05 $773
(184,400 SF) $9,220/YR
5
1997-1998 Ultimate 1997-1998 1997-1998 Ultimate Ultimate
Maintenance Mainatenance Base Unit Maintenance Base Unit Maintenance
Areas Areas Cost/SF Cost/YR Cost/SF Cost/YR
F. Vandalism/Repair $3,500/YR $14,000/YR
(all planting area)
G. Water
1. All Planting $4,000/YR $23,364/YR
•
H. Power
1. Controllers $300/YR $2,000/YR
Subtotal $34,360/YR $277,032/YR
I. Administration Fees
1. City of Dublin Administration @ 8% $2,749/YR $22,163/YR
2. County Fees for Collection.of.Assessments @ 1.7% $584/YR $4,709/YR
3. Delinquency Factor @ 5% $1,718/YR $13,852/YR
Total $39,411/YR $317,756/YR
Assessment per Acre 1997-1998 (85.6 Acres) $ 460.41/YR
Assessment per Acre Ultimate (447.6 Acres) $ 710/YR
The annual levy of assessment shall be established asa range between $0.00:and
$710.00 per developed acres.:--However, the maximum-amount_of the assessment of
$710.00 per developed acre:, shall be increased annually, beginning on January 1, 1998,
f: by the percentage increase in the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Price Index .(applies_to all
- costs except water and electricity), plus any increase.in the,cost of water and.electricity.
if the.Bay:Area Urban Wage Earner Index is unavailable or deemed by the City Council to
be inappropriate,-a comparable consumer price_index,..,as.approved by the City Council,
shall be used to replace the Bay Area Urban Wage Earner Index.
6
/6
PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 97-1
CITY OF DUBLIN
ASSESSMENT and LOT PROPERTY OWNERS ACRES LOTS AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT FOR
NUMBER 1997-1998 TAX YEAR
Per Acres Per Lot TOTAL
LOTS 1 -154,(SINGLE FAMILY) UNKNOWN 21.9 . 154 460.4 65.472 10082.76
OF TRACT 6822 - _
LOTS 155-277 (TOWNHOMES) UNKNOWN 7.7 122 460.4 29.058 3545.08
OF TRACT 6822
PARCELS 1,2 and 3 UNKNOWN 56 460.4 25782.4
OF PARCEL MAP 6879
REMAINDER OF UNDEVELOPED SURPLUS PROPERTY 362 0.00 0.00
PARCEL AUTHORITY OF
ALAMEDA COUNTY
TOTAL _ 3941024
, .
•
, -
•
7
PART D
METHOD OF SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO: 97-1
CITY OF DUBLIN
•
_`. The maximum developed acre assessment will be $710 per year, based on a total of
389,400 square footage of street improvements and a total of 957,000 square
footage of creek improvements and 447.6 acres of developed property at buildout of
all property within the District.
The cost of the Improvements will be divided equally among the total number of
developed properties within the boundaries of the District on a per acre basis.
"Developed property" shall include property which has a recorded final map or parcel
map as of July 1st of each year.
Each year the City Council shall determine the assessment for that year based on the
following:
1. Actual square footage of installed improvements relative to the total amount.
of square footage of Improvements`. -
r` 2. Cost of installed Improvements.
: -
= 3. Total amount of developed acreage.
. 4.-,.: The an nual assessment for the developed acreage for. that year shall be
spread based on the following:
A. Commercial developed area, per acre basis.
B. Single-family residential area, per acre basis.
C. Multi-family residential area, per acre basis.
5. The single-family and multi-family residential area per acre assessment will
be spread on a per lot basis based on the number of lots on the final map or
parcel map for each particular development.
6. If the assessment in any year would exceed $710 per acre, the amount in
excess of $710 shall be assessed to the remaining undeveloped property on
a per acre basis, subject to the maximum developed acre amount.
8
7. The maximum developed acre assessment of $710 per year will be
increased annually by the percentage increase in the Bay area Urban
Wage Earner Price Index (applies to all costs except water and
electricity), plus any actual increase in the. cost for water and
electricity.
8. If the square footage cost of the Improvements will be less than the
amount set forth herein (after adjustment in accordance with
Paragraph 7), the assessment shall be reduced proportionately to
reflect the reduced cost of Improvements in that year.
•
The cost of the Improvements and the total square footage of the Improvements
are taken from Part B of the Engineer's Report. The following is an example
calculation for first year and second year assessment scenarios:
SAMPLE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
1. FIRST YEAR
A. ASSUMPTIONS
Constructed Landscape Area; 50,000 s.f.
Constructed Creek Area: 0 s.f.
Maintenance Cost per Square Foot $0.50
Developed Area: - �.., 15 Acres Subdivision "A",
LL 100 single-family detached lots
5 Acres Subdivision "B"
70 multi-family lots
20 Acres Commercial
40 Acres Total
B. ASSESSMENT CALCULATION: -
Total Landscape Maintenance Cost=$0.50 x 50,000 S.F.=$25,000
Assessment per Developed Acre=$25,000/40 Acres=$625 per acre
Subdivision "A" Assessment=15 Acres x $625/Acre=$9,375
Subdivision "A" Assessment per lot=$9,375/100=$93.75 per lot
Subdivision "B" Assessment=5 Acres x $625/Acre=$3,125
Subdivision "B" Assessment per unit=$3,125/7.0 lot=$44.64 per lot
Commercial Assessment=$526.00 per acre
Undeveloped Property Assessment=$0 per acre
Page 9
¶
2. SECOND YEAR
A. ASSUMPTIONS:
Constructed Landscape Area 70,000 SF
Constructed Creek Area: 400,000 S.F.
Maintenance Cost per Square Foot
for landscaped area $0.40
Maintenance Cost per Square Foot
for creek area $0.08
Developed Area: 15 Acres (Subdivision "A"
100 Single-Family .•
Detached,Lots
5 Acres (Subdivision "B")
70 Multi-Family Lots)
8 Acres (Subdivision "C"
• 64 Single-Family Lots
7 Acres (Subdivision "D"
140 Multi-Family Lots
20 Acres Commercial
55 Acres Total
Undeveloped Area 410 Acres
Cost of Living Increase: 3% Over Year One
Water Cost Increase 3% Over Year One
Electrical Cost Increase 3% Over Year One
,;.B. , :; ASSESSMENT CALCULATION:
Maximum Allowable Assessment=Year One Maximum Assessment
} =_ + Electrical, Water, & Cost of Living Increases 4710.00 +
$21.30=$731.30/Acre
Total Max. Allowable Assessment=Max. Assessment x Devel. Acres
=$731.30/Acre x 55 Acres=$40,221.50
Maintenance Cost=Landscape Area Cost+ Creek Cost
=70,000 x $0.40 + 400,000 x $0.08=$60,000 -
Undeveloped Property Assessment=Maintenance Cost- Max. Allow
Assessment=$60,000 - $40,221.50=$19,778.50
Undeveloped Property Assessment Per Acre=$19,778.50/410 Acres
=$480.24/Acre .
Page 10
Assessment per Developed Acre=Max. Assessment=$731.30 per
Acre
Subdivision "A" Assessment=15 Acres x $731.301Acre=$10,969.50
Subdivision "A" Assessment per Lot=$10,969.501100=$109.70 per
Lot
Subdivision "B" Assessment=5 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$3,656.50
Subdivision "B" Assessment per Lot=$3,656.50170=$52.24 per Lot
Subdivision "C" Assessment= 8 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$5,850.40
Subdivision "C" Assessment per Lot=$ 5,850.40164=$91.41 per Lot
Subdivision "D" Assessment= 7 Acres x $731.30/Acre=$5,119.10
-- Subdivision "D" Assessment per Lot=$ 5,119.101140=$36.57 per Lot
Commercial Assessment=$731.30/Acre
Page 11
PART E
PROPERTY OWNERS'S LIST
LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 97-1
CITY OF DUBLIN
Assessment No. Name of Property Owner
Surplus Property Authority of
Alameda County
224 W. Winton Avenue, Rm 151
Hayward, CA 94544
•
•
•
Page 12
,•�w .! i(;{ ;igi',:'.IU ,a r;+.. ny. ..,. x, '.ok rC rvyJ ota:;'trt �.4.:0,., or+ _ . „ ..,a«u,,... ..
. • . :
c--,T, w EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT
�r RE 3382 IN 478
i
• N7 .y'j/�. Y i�;! CITY OF DUBLIN CERTIFICATES —N•
riiro 'or A%e� I --MQD �~---/r-� ' ' �r FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK THIS __
T W lucre .. Z a DAY OF _ 199_
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
'zr % m
• KAY KECK, CITY CLERK
g, PARCEL 2, RE 2439 IN 213 • i CITY OF DUBLIN o 600 Izo��o
1 hr� y, Y d tr. ��. 1
•
i "»SJTr� � k's I. 1R I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS APPROVED BY I IA rta
e4Rj "-3 I Inch-e00 IL
lb . rn o THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AT A
• I IwlpYUTr • I6''•/q _en
REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE ___DAY
JvLIC ; . .";, /1 Z OF •199_ BY ITS RESOLUTION NO.
• _e'•' 'ki7lV?T krk S
Aololtlt P1 rL£ KAY KECK, CITY CLERK
6 1719.94'
_ CITY OF DUBLIN•
rleeTJxy tit LANDS OF CASTERSON
JNe9r R-341.50' NYTe77t Nxtl/et h
1,- K$FRIES N0. 80-229805 C .189 Of of iotam'
n C-Jldx' 142A7' JJasl' ,b ?'�CYli71♦� ��[L�
8 O �' ,:[ A 70' T' �� .M, 6 ZW.O Q7.1 71 .11•
W N T% % i17r5077T ,�% C7 7lUllP' Iedx. ari0'4!.
1.M I- 1RQY, .
I-N �3 A�.>e31y 14'‘ COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE IN Marna( p1/MIL
oc i U "51040Jy Jan
CJ Y i , FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF THE 0 eorijllt JAJJ'
14 t ' 'o % e-JJ79'J9• '• COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIS _ U Notsve 1t 771.7 '
t II Ree7JYJt 107.77
Z tl-S i.B ;i• �i DAY OF 199 t1 x7479147 9cL'
D ♦5 % �`, le lain Cry &Lir
ti 3 c u N8r4e�oti ,
i,1 od 99.JY to Amman. .ILr�I.Y
x ,` o PATRICK 0'CONNELL u MV'uY4y ISeb'
a a COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER U9 RQ7SYuy JMn'
'„� �i - ;v;, a COUNTY OF ALAMEDA LII Hee'eu'r 150.11
i �, STATE OF CAUFORNIA trl Me1s1'111r, 7747Y
.1 al 111}VY00y 1 2411'
II4 Nee'4eb9y 1�AY
• �0 •,'. :�...�' 111
jIJ77.x r- Cre
t i 11111111111: �� ': u9 we4r4at Ilaro'
111111111: Aaevrny uo NOI41TJ 443x•
i i _ hi to xeew•toj Jraw-
% Ts 9QP\,,; 4499 COUNTY RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE MxM11� 17e7i�
L7J Nee70i4 W se.0
' i 11 • ►t4Q►• '‘ FILED THIS DAY OF 199_, AT
///// � �Y ✓�////%�:-i 44t ltri t ■ 1HE HOUR OF O'CLOCK __.M. IN BOOK ---
� ��'�"'�'� OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AT PAGE __
MllTr7rt I rARtri orc IJJ'� �///////../. /��'� THEREOF IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
mzel' 111 3379 •,i1. 7lray THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
s - .r
. w_._ .. - • 7A cE TWO I . ...- ._ - -
,'; 1 AC17J'Ut L
i PM 3377 I Wan.Fait s 40AQ6' 1 FEE: • SERIES N0. _____
LI (16 111 L Pu eel9 ;��•Q ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM u
L'• LIMITING AND LANDSCAPE
I 4• G L7 1 PARC0.THR[C I `"•` PAINICK O'CONNELL, COUNTY HLCONUEN IN AND
Npi76,re • I rN/9771 ` U FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, MAINTENANCE DISTRICT•
J,37117,4' c 14 CIJ- ,,,' JI •. STATE OF CALIFORNIA NO. 97-1
1r ur L' I u 1 •to CITY OF DUBLIN
•
(10
HIGHWAY ROUTE )u C„ it tY ALA1dEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
L!o
LEGEND
RUGGERI - JENSEN AND ASSOCIATES
1.9•4■4 DISTRICT BOUNDARY
LOT LINE CIVIL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
PVA4ANTON.CALIFORNIA
JUNE 199E
1
JOB N0.961074.10 31117.7 l or l SHEETS
PART F
..1
.