Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.2 Support Roth Amendment CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: October 28, 1991 SUBJECT: Letters in Support of the Roth Amendment (Prepared by: Bo Barker, Management Assistant) EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Draft Letters of Support RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to execute letters in support of he Roth Amendment q11,, FINANCIAL STATEMENT:None DESCRIPTION: Senator William Roth has introduced new language to amend the Defense Authorization Act. The Amendment would clarify Section 8125, regarding conveying closed military bases to the neighboring local communities . The bill previously did not state this as the original intention of Section 8125 . Without the Amendment, the State would have control over the land and decide to keep the base or to designate some other entity to receive it. The Roth Amendment would return control of closed military bases to local governments . The National League of Cities has written all California Cities to muster support for the "Roth Amendment . " Staff recommends letters be sent to Congressman Julian Dixon and Congressman Jerry Lewis . These are the two California representatives on committees in which the bill is scheduled to be heard. a: 1028roth.agenda#6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO: ITEM No. AWAo C ITY CLERK FILE 0 0 DRAFT October 29, 1991 Honorable Jerry Lewis Honorable Julian Dixon 2312 Rayburn HOB 2400 Rayburn HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 RE: Roth Amendment to Defense Authorization Bill Dear Mr. Lewis and Mr. Dixon: At the regular City Council meeting on October 28, 1991 , the City Council considered the legislation referenced above. On behalf of the City Council and the residents of the City of Dublin urge you to support an amendment to the Defense Authorization Bill that Senatoro William Roth has submitted. The Roth Amendment will clarify and improve the language of Section 8125 adopted by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The Committee language is identical to an amendment recently adopted (67-30) by the Senate on the Defense Authorization Act. The stated purpose of that language is to convey closed military bases to the neighboring local communities. Unfortunately, that would not be the effect of the section without the amendment. Through an oversight in the drafting of that section, local communities would not receive the property from the federal government. Instead, it is the State which would decide whether to keep the base itself or to designate some other entity to receive it. It is clear this was not the intended result of the legislation from the findings and purposes provisions of Section 8125. For example, one excerpt reads: the purpose of the section is to help impacted local communities "by authorizing the real and excess related personal property, on which the military installations are located, to be conveyed to the impacted community as soon as possible after a decision to close the military installation is made." We are also concerned with the committee language in the provisions allowing the Department of Defense to retain five bases which could be sold to the highest bidder. Our concern is that in those instances, the local communities are not given zoning authority prior to the sale of the land by the Department. Such authority is vital if those communities are to ensure that the development which occurs on the excess property is needed and can be supported by existing infrastructure. Senator Roth's amendment will address the concerns mentioned and assure that this section of the bill actually achieves the desired result. Without its adoption, that section will do little to help those communities impacted by a base closing. Sincerely, DRAFT Peter W. Snyder Mayor City of Dublin PWS:bb:slh a: 1029roth.agenda#6 cc: Congressman Fortney "Pete" Stark, 9th District