The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.5 San Ramon Rd Specific Plan 370,-* ,.._ . AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 8, 1985 . SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING San Ramon Road Specific Plan Improvement Assessment District EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1 . A Resolution Overruling Protests on Resolution of Intention to Acquire and Construct Improvements. 2 . A Resolution and Order Adopting Engineer' s Report Confirming the ' Assessment and Ordering the Work and Acquisitions . 3 . A Resolution of Award of Contract. 4 . A Resolution Designating Collection Officer. 5 . A Resolution Awarding Sale of Bonds . 6 . Engineers Report 7 . Bid Summary 8 . Boundary Map RECOMMENDATION: 1 . Open public hearing 2 . Hear protests 3 . Close public hearing 4 . Adopt resolutions FINANCIAL STATEMENT: No cost to the City except maintenance cost of improvements once completed and • accepted. This district will construct public improvements including purchasing right-of-way and incidental costs at an estimated cost of approximately $857, 869 . These costs will be spread J over the parcels within the district on a benefit basis. DESCRIPTION: On May 28 , 1985, the City Council held a public hearing and received Staff and public input on the. preliminary Engineer' s Report. The City Council then adopted the following resolutions : . ITEM NO. b . 5 COPIES TO: f 1 . Resolution of Preliminary approval of Engineer' s Report. 2 . Resolution appointing time and place of hearing protests in relation to proposed acquisitions and improvements and directing notice. 3 . Resolution calling for sealed proposals . _ 4 . Resolution describing proposed boundaries of assessment district, directing filing of map, and directing recordation of notice of assessment. In response to the resolution calling for sealed proposals the City received a total of three ( 3 ) bids (see attached bid summary) for this project. The low bidder was Redgwick Construction Compancy with a bid of $171, 743 . 00 . Staff has reviewed the low bidder ' s proposal and finds it to be in order. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions to accomplish the following: 1. Overrule protests on the Resolution of Intention (No. 94-84 ) to acquire and construct improvements 2 . Adopt Engineer' s Report confirming the assessment and ordering the work and acquisitions . 3 . Award of the contract to Redgwick Construction Company the low bidder. 4 . Designate a collection officer to receive assessment payments . 5 . Award the Sale of Bonds . Mr. Robert Haight, the legal counsel for the District will be available at the meeting to explain the legal, details of the proceedings . Further, he has negotiated a Sale of Bonds for this District with First California Regional Securities, Inc. for which you have a resolution awarding _ sale in your packet.- Because of the extremely good market for these types of bonds a negotiated purchase is as good as a bid for sale. This will also save time in the processing of the District. Since the low bid was close to the engineer' s estimate, it is recommended that the construction contingency allowance be increased in order to keep the total construction cost the same as identified in the preliminary engineer' s report. The right-of-way estimate, however is shown as approximately $43 , 500 more than the preliminary engineer' s estimate at the advice of the City Attorney in order to allow for contingencies within this portion of the budget. The related incidental costs will also raise a small amount accordingly. These right-of-way costs are shared only by the three property owners adjacent to the extension of Amador Valley Boulevard. Frontage improvements and the installation of a permanent four way signal at San Ramon Road and Amador Valley Boulevard will be undertaken at the same time as the City' s Capital Improvement Project San Ramon Road Phase II . Should the cost of these improvements be either higher or lower than the estimate in the Engineer' s Report, the Council would have taken action at a later date to adjust the assessment. -2- RESOLUTION NO. -85 A RESOLUTION OVERRULING PROTESTS ON RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ACQUIRE AND CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF DUBLIN SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, that WHEREAS, this Council did on the 27th day of August, 1984 , adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 94-84 , to acquire and construct public improvements in and for said City; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 1985, this Council adopted Resolution No. 45-85 appointing time and place of hearing protests in relation to the proposed acquisitions and improvements and directing notice : WHEREAS, notice was given of the time and place therein stated in the manner provided by law, as appears from the affidavits on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said matter came on regularly for hearing at the time therein fixed; and WHEREAS, all written protests and other written communi- cations were publicly read at said meeting and all persons desiring to be heard were fully heard. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, as follows : 1 . That the protests against said acquisitions and improve- ments were not signed by the owners of a majority or more ,of :.the area . of the lands within the assessment district, or of the area of the lands within the assessment district assessed for the costs and expenses of said work. 2 . That protests be, and each of them are hereby, overruled. ******* I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution -was duly :.and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of July, 1985, by the following vote of members thereof: AYES: NOES : ABSENT: City Clerk Mayor 3 i f y ,a ; RESOLUTION NO. 85 A RESOLUTION AND ORDER ADOPTING ENGINEER' S REPORT CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING THE WORK AND ACQUISITIONS CITY OF DUBLIN SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California that, WHEREAS, on the 27th day of August, 1984 , said Council adopted its Resolution of Intention No. 94-84, to acquire and con- struct public improvements in said City and referred the proposed improvements to the Engineer of Work of said City, he being the officer having charge and control of the construction of improve- ments in and for said City of the kind described in said Resolution of 'Intention and being a competent person appointed by said Council for that purpose; and WHEREAS, said Council thereby directed said Engineer of Work to make and file with the City Clerk a report in writing in accordance with and pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ; and WHEREAS, said report was duly made and filed with the City Clerk, whereupon said Clerk presented it to the Council for consid- eration; and WHEREAS, said Council thereupon duly considered said re- port and each and every part thereof and found that it contained all the matters and things called for by provisions of said Act, including ( 1) plans and specifications of the proposed improvement, • (2 ) estimate of costs, (3 ) diagram of district, and (4 ) an assess- ment according to benefits, all of which was done in the form and manner required by said Act; and WHEREAS, said Council found that said report and each and every part thereof was sufficient in every particular and deter- mined that it-should stand as the report- for all subsequent proceed- ings under said Act, appointed Monday, July 8, 1985, at the hour of 7 :30 o ' clock p.m. , of said day in the Dublin Library, 7606 Amador Valley Blvd. , Dublin, California, as the time and place for hearing protests in relation to said proposed improvements, and directing the City Clerk to give notice of said hearing as required by said Act; and I WHEREAS, it appears that notices of said hearing were duly and regularly posted, mailed and published in the time, form and manner required by said Act, as evidenced by the affidavits on file with the City Clerk, whereupon said hearing was duly and reg- ularly held at the time and place stated in said notice; and WHEREAS, person interested, objecting to said acquisitions and improvements , or to the extent of the assess- ment district, or to the proposed assessment or diagram, or to the maps and descriptions or to the grades at which said work will be done, or to the Engineer ' s estimate of the costs and expenses thereof, filed written protests with the City Clerk at or before the time set for hearing, and all persons interested desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and all matters and things pertaining to said improvements were fully heard and considered by said Council, and said Council has acquired juris- diction to order said improvements and the/confirmation of said 42 diagram and assessment to pay the costs and expenses thereof . NOW, THEREFORE, said Council does hereby FIND, DETERMINE and ORDER, as follows ; 1. That the owners of one-half (z) of the area to be assessed for the cost of the project did not, at or prior to the time fixed for said hearing file written protests against the pro- posed improvements as a whole, or against the said district or the extent thereof to be assessed for the costs and expenses of said improvements as a whole, or as to the Engineer ' s estimate of said costs and expenses , or against the diagram and assessment to pay for the costs and expenses thereof . 2 . That the district benefited by said improvements and to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof and the exterior boundaries thereof are more particularly described in said Resolutiion of Intention and made a part hereof by reference thereto. That all public streets and highways within said assessment district in use in the performance of a public function as such shall be omitted from said district and from the levy and collection of the special taxes to be hereafter levied and collected to cover the costs and expenses of said improvements . 3 . That the plans and specifications for :the_.proposed'_im- provements, contained in said report, be, and they are hereby, finally adopted and approved as the plans and specifications to which said work shall be done as called for in said Resolution of Intention. 4 . That the Engineer ' s estimate of the itemized and total costs and expenses of said improvements , and of the incidental ex- penses in connection therewith, contained in said report, be, and it is hereby, finally adopted and approved as the Engineer ' s total and detailed estimate of the costs and expenses of said improvements . 5 . That the public interest and convenience require and said Council does hereby order the improvements to be made as described in and in accordance with said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk, reference to which is hereby made for a more particular description of said improvements, and also for further particulars pursuant to the provisions of said Municipal ImprovementAct of 1913 . 6 . That the diagram showing the assessment district referred to and described in said Resolution of Intention, and also the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions having been given a separate number upon said diagram, as contained in said report, be, and it is hereby, finally approved and confirmed as the diagram of the properties to be assessed to pay the costs and ex- penses of said improvements . 7 . That the assessment of the total amount Of :the :costs and expenses of the proposed improvements upon the several sub- divisions of land in said district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by said subdivisions respectively, from said improvements , and of the expenses incidental thereto, contained in said report, be, and the same is hereby, finally approved and confirmed as the assessment to pay the costs and expenses of said improvements . 8 . That said Engineer ' s Report be, and the same is hereby, finally adopted and approved as a whole . 9 . That the City Clerk shall forthwith deliver to the Superintendent of Streets the said assessment, together with said diagram thereto attached and made a part thereof, as confirmed by 7 this Council, with his certificate of such confirmation thereto attached and of the date thereof ; and that said Superintendent of Streets shall record said diagram and assessment in his office in a suitable book to be kept for that purpose; and append thereto his certificate of the date of such recording, and such recordation shall be and constitute the assessment roll herein. 10 . That said Superintendent of Streets, upon the recording of said diagram and assessment, shall mail to each owner of real property within the assessment district at his last known address as the same appears on the tax rolls of the City or on file in the office of the City Clerk, or to both addresses if said address is not the same, or to the general delivery when no address so appears , a state- ment containing a designation by street number or other description of the property assessed sufficient to enable the owner to identify the same, the amount of the assessment, the time and place of payment thereof, the effect of failure to pay within such time, and a state- ment of the fact that bonds will be issued on the unpaid assessment pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 . 11 . That said Superintendent of Streets shall also give notice by publishing a copy of a Notice to Pay Assessments once a week for two weeks in the local newspaper published and circulated in Dublin, that said assessment has been recorded in his office, and that all sums assessed thereon are due and payable immediately, and that payment of said sums is to be made thirty (30 ) days after the date of recording said assessment, which date shall be stated in said notice, and of the fact that bonds will be issued upon unpaid assessments as above provided. * * * * * * * * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution -was duly arid regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of July , 1985 , by the following vote of the member thereof : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: City Clerk Mayor / • RESOLUTION NO. -85 - A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT CITY OF DUBLIN SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, that WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin did in open session on the 26th day of June , 1985, publicly examine and declare all sealed proposals or bids for the work to be done and improvements to be made, as described and specified in Resolu- tion of Intention No. 94-84 , adopted by the City Council on August 27, 1984 , to which resolution reference is hereby made for a. description of the work and improvements to be done and the materials , supplies and equipment to be furnished therefor. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows : 1 . That said City Council hereby rejects all of said proposals or bids except that hereinafter mentioned, and hereby awards the contract for doing the work and improvements and furnishing the materials, supplies and equipment necessary therefor, to the lowest responsible bidder, to wit: Redgwick Construction Company at the prices named in its bid. 2 . That the Mayor of said City is hereby authorized to make and enter into a written contract with said successful bidder, and to receive and approve all bonds in connection therewith, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to attest his signature and affix thereto the official seal of said city. * * * * * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, at aregular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of July , .1985, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES : NOES : ABSENT: l City Clerk Mayor 7 ri, A r 3-; DI , 7 1471. -70. 1-' 3 RESOLUTION NO. -85 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COLLECTION OFFICER CITY OF DUBLIN SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, that the Finance Director of said City, be, and he is hereby appointed as the person to whom payment of assessments shall be made under Resolution of Intention No. 94-84 , adopted by this Council on August 27, 1984, and that his office at City Hall, 6500 Dublin Blvd. , Dublin, California, is hereby designated as the place at which the said payments will be made. ' * * * * * * * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of July , 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: City Clerk Mayor 1 t RESOLUTION NO. - 85 A RESOLUTION AWARDING SALE OF BONDS CITY OF DUBLIN SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, that WHEREAS, the City has received a proposal for the purchase of bonds, and said proposal has been received and publicly examined and declared by this City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, as follows : 1 . That the proposal received for the purchase of said bonds from FIRST CALIFORNIA REGIONAL SECURITIES, INC. , is acceptable and said bonds be, and they are hereby ordered sold to FIRST CALIFORNIA REGIONAL SECURITIES, INC. , subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth in their bid for the purchase of said bonds . 2 . That the City Treasurer be, and he is hereby, directed to have said bonds printed forthwith, and that the same be immedi- ately signed, sealed and delivered to said FIRST CALIFORNIA REGIONAL SECURITIES, INC. , in exchange for the purchase price thereof. 3 . That the interest rate of said bonds, be and the same is hereby fixed at the rate stated in said bid. * * * * * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly -adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of July , 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof : AYES : NOES : ABSENT: City Clerk Mayor l 7'.::';,,1 111' -; .:'-': ].. tim57 ' ENGINEER'S REPORT ON SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 AREA "A" FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS WEST SIDE OF SAN RAMON ROAD AND OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS AREA "B" - AM ADOR VALLEY .BOULEVARD EXTENSION AND TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION CITY OF DUBLIN PREPARED BY: SANTINA & THOMPSON INC. atm (c, CONTENTS Engineers Report (Naritive) Description of Work Assessment Assessment Spread Engineers Cost Estimate Method of Apportionment of Assessment Certifications Descriptions and Plats of Parcel to be Acquired Assessment Diagram ENGINEER' S REPORT ON SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF DUBLIN I, Lee S. Thompson, Engineer of Work and City Engineer, City of Dublin, Alameda County, California, in proceedings being conducted by the City Council of said City under Resolution of Intention No 94-84, adopted on August 27 , 1984 relating to the above described improvement project, hereby submit the Engineer's Report called for in said Resolution of Intention. 1 . Plans and Specifications of the proposed improvements to be made are hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference. 2 . The Engineer' s statement of the itemized and total costs and expense of said improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, is bound into the accompanies and Diagram and Assessment hereinafter mentioned. 3 . The Diagram of the Assessment district is bound into and constitutes a part of said Diagram and Assessment. 4 . A proposed assessment is bound into and constitutes a part of the Diagram and Assessment hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference. 5 . Maps and descriptions of any lands, easements, facilities, and rights-of—way to be acquired, if any, in said proceedings are hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference. Respectfully sub ted, By: Lee S. Thompson Engineer of Work City of Dublin City Engineer • • Description of Work San Ramon Road Specific Plan Improvements This district will provide funding for engineering design and survey work, construction costs, inspection services right of way, right of way engineering and acquisition costs, assessment district costs, and miscellaneous appurtenant costs for the public improvements generally described as follows: 1. Street widening improvements along San Ramon Road frontages . 2 . The extension of Amador Valley Blvd. extending west from San Ramon Road ending in a cul-de-sac . 3 . Water, sewer and utility installation within the right of way areas for the above improvements. 4 . Required offsite improvements along San Ramon Road. 5 . New four way traffic signal at San Ramon Road and Amador Valley Blvd. ASSESSMENT ON SAN RAMON ROAD SPECFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CITY OF DUBLIN WHEREAS, on August 27, 1984 , the City Council of the City of Dublin, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, as amended, adopted its Resolution of Intention No. 94-84 for the acquisition and construction of the improvement therein described. WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention directed the Engineer of Work to make and file a report presenting a general description of any works and applicances already installed and any other property necessary or convenient for the operation of the improvements, plans , and specificaions for the proposed consruction, estimate of costs, maps and descriptions of lands ad easements to be acquired, and diagram and assessment of and upon the subdivisions of land within the assessment district, to which Resolution reference is hereby made for further particulars. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Lee S. Thompson, Engineer of Work and said City, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the City Council of said City, hereby made the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated costs and expenses of said acquisition work, and improvements, and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by the assessment district as follows : ENGINEER' S ESTIMATE As Preliminarily As Finally As Modified after Approved Confirmed Recordation Construction $ 416,723 Right-of-Way 206 ,409 Incidentals 181 ,436 'Total Costs $ 804 , 568 Assessment $ 804,568 And I do hereby assess and apportion said total amount of the cost and expenses of said acquisitions, work and improvements upon the several lots, pieces or parcels or portions of lots or subdivisions of land liable therefore and benefited thereby, and hereinafter numbered to correspond with the numbers upon the attached diagram, upon each, severally and respectively, in accordance with the benefits, and more particularly set forth in the list hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof. As required by said Act , a diagram is hereto attached showing the assessment district and also the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within said district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions having been given a separate number upon said diagram. Said assessment is made upon the several subdivisions of land wihin said district in proporion to the estimated benefits to be received by said subdivisions , respectively, from said improvement. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herin are the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of said property. And because the names of several owners are unknown to me, I hereby assume all owners are "Unknown", and same is assumed so designated opposite the number of each subdivision of land assessed , the amount assessed thereon, the number on the assessment and the book. Each subdivision of land is described on the assessor's maps of the County of Alameda for the fiscal year of 1984-85 above the parcel numbers. Said description are a combination of numbers such as 941-111-14 , which means Book 941 , Page 11, Block 1, Parcel 14 of the Assessor' s Map Books and used for the County Tax Roll . Notice is hereby given that serial bonds to represent unpaid assessments and bear interest at the rate of not to exceed twelve (12%)percent per annum, will be issued hereunder in the • manner provided by Division 10 of the Streets and Highway Code, and Imporvement Bond Act of 1915, and the last installment of such bonds shall mature not to exceed fourteen (14) years from 'the second day of January next succeeding the next September 1st following their date. Dated : 5 /2-1 i Lee S. Thompso'1111PF Engineer of Work ASSESSMENT SPREAD - ASSESSMENT ASSESSORS PARCEL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT PARCEL NO. NO. AREA A AREA B TOTAL 1 941-2773-1 $ 23 ,841 92,276 116 ,117 2 941-2773-2 24 ,102 • 93,286 117 ,388 3 941-2773-3 11 ,746 45,465 57 ,211 4 941-2773-4 27 ,323 105 ,747 . 133 ,070 SUBTOTAL 1-4 423 ,7.86 5 941-040-007 25 ,049 237 ,655 262 ,704 6 941-040-003 671 64 ,647 65 ,318 7 941-040-002-3. 4 ,894 37 , 888 42 ,782 8 941-040-022-7 0 24 ,648 24 ,648 SUBTOTAL 6-8 132 ,748 9 941-040-002-10 6 ,774 0 6 ,774 • 10 941-040-002-14 9 ,659 _0 9 ,659 11 . 941-040-001-2 22 ,198 0 22,198 TOTALS 156 ,257 701,612 857 ,869 COST ESTIMATE SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RIGHT OF WAY TOTAL TO AREA COSTS LAND COSTS INCIDENTALS ASSESSMENT FRONTAGE IMPROVE- $115,645.00 40,612.00 $156,257.00 MENT WEST SIDE OF S:R.R., AND OFF- A SITE IMPROVEMENTS & NORTH BOUND DUBLIN BLVD/SRR MEDIAN AMADOR VALLEY $301,078.00 $250,000.00 150,534.00 $701,612.00 B BOULEVARD EXTEN- SION AND TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION . RIGE)T OF WAY LAM) COST (ARDOR VALLEY BOULEVARD iSION) PROPERTY OWNER LAND AREA UNIT LAND COST TOTAL LAND COST JEHA 4,352 S.F. 7.00/S.F. $ 30,464.00 NICHANDROS 23,635 S.F. 7.00/S.F. $165,445.00 SUBTOTAL $195,909.00 APPRAISAL 5,000.00 TITLE REPORT AND INSURANCE 1,000.00 ACQUISITION COST AND LEGAL 20,000.00 CONTINGENCY 28,091.00 TOTAL $250,000.00 SAN RAMON SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 ITEMIZED INCIDENTALS AREA ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ATTORNEY'S PRINTING BOND DISCOUNT INSPECTION TOTAL FEE FEE FEE ADVERTISING 5% @ 8% ASSESSMENT 2% OF BOND BOND RESERVE DISTRICT ASSESSMENT PRINTING FUND DISTRICT 10% 9,252.00 1,804.00 2,313.00 578.00 7,347.00 4,625.00 40,612.00 A 14,693.00 24,086.00 4,696.00 11,022.00 2,755.00 31,977.00 12,043.00 150,534.00 63,955.00 CITY OF DUBLIN. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 AREA "B" ENGINEER' S ESTIMATE OF COST OF CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE EXTENSION OF AMADOR VALLEY BLVD. (CONTRACT 85- ITEM ITEM EST UNIT UNIT TOTAL NO DESCRIPTION QTY OF PRICE PRICE MEASURE (IN FIG) (IN FIG) 1. Mobilization LS LS 4 ,880 .00 2 . Traffic Control LS LS 5,150 .00 3 . Construction Staking LS LS 5 ,000 . 00 4 . Clearing & Grubbing 4,500 SY 2.50 11,250 .00 5. Earthwork (Road Excavation) 2,700 CY 3 .15 8,505 .00 6. Finish Grading 3 ,330 SY 1.90 6 ,270 .00 7. Conc. Curb & Gutter 1,386 LF 8.00 11,088 .00 ' 8 . Conc. Sidewalk, Driveway & Handicap Ramp 4 ,600 SF 2.00 9,200 .00 9. Street Pavement Section (2 1/2 AC; 6" AB; 9"ASB) (Amador Valley Blvd. ) 22 ,000 SF 1. 32 29 ,040 .00 10. Street Pavement Section (6" AC; 15. 1/2" AB) (San Ramon Road) 10 ,400 SF 2.47 25 ,688 .00 11. Median Curb 270 LF 6 .00 1 ,620 .00 12. Interlocking Paving Stone 405 SF 10 .00 4 ,050 .00 13. Drop Inlet 3 .EA 1,200 .00 3 ,600 .00 14 . Remove existing headwell and construct S.D. Manhole 1 EA 2,000 .00 2,000.00 15. Remove SSMH Frame & Cover to Grade 1 EA 500 .00 500 . 00 16 . 12" RCP CL. III 284 LF 19 .00 5 ,396 .00 17. 8" ACP 600 LF 22 .00 13 ,200 .00 . 18 . 8" Gate Valve 1 EA 10 .00 1 ,000 .00 19 . Connect Water Main to Existing 1 EA 2,500 .00 2,500 .00 20. Asphalt Conc. Island 920 SF 2.70 2 ,484 . 00 21. AC Dike 210 LF 2. 10 441.00 22 . 2x12 RWD Header 80 LF 7 .00 560 .00 23 . Striping 4" 420 LF .40 168 .00 24 . Striping 8" white 410 LF .50 205.00 25. Striping 12"solid white 545 LF .60 327 .00 26 . Pavement Markings 6 EA 25.00 150 .00 27 . Relocate Fire Hydrant - 1 EA 15 .00 1,500 .00 28 . Interim Traffic Signal LS LS 10 ,000 .00 29 . Relocate existing fence 195 LF 20 .00 3,900 .00 30 . New fire hydrant 1 EA 2,200 .00 2,200 .00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $171,743 .00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 25,094 .00 • TOTAL ESTIMATED COST PLUS CONTINGENCY $196 ,837 .00 ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 AREA "B" ULTIMATE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND RELATED COSTS ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY PRICE 1. Final Traffic Signalization 1 EA 85 , 000 . 00 85 ,000 .00 2. New Island 1 EA. 800.00 800. 00 3. 8" Striping AVB & SRR 4,400 LF . 40 1,760 . 00 4. Pavement Markings 8 EA 25.00 7,750. 00 TOTAL 95 , 330. 00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 9 ,533 .00 $104 , 863. 00 ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 1, 2, 3 , & 4 ITEM . DESCRIPTION OF ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL ITEM • QUANTITY PRICE 1. Northbound Dublin/SRR Median Curb 560 LF 7. 00 3 ,920 . 00 2. Remove Median Curb & Conc . LS LS 1,120. 00 3. Striping . - Northbound 680 LF . 50 340. 00 4. Pavement Markings - Dublin 4' EA 25:00 100. 00 5. Sawcut 560 LF 1. 00 560. 00 6. AC Pavement, Northbound 3 ,200 SF 2.00 6,400. 00 SUBTOTAL 12,440. 00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 1 ,244 .00 13,684.00 . 1. Sawcut (Frontage . Improvements 50 LF 1.00 50.00 2. AC Pavement 12.5 625 . SF . 2. 00 1,250.00 3. Clearing & Grubbing LS "LS 500 . 00 4. Curb & Gutter 50 LF 10. 00 500.00 5. Contribution to Improv. on Dublin Blvd. West of SRR 50 , 000. 00 6. Grading 1, 800 SF 0.20 360. 00 SUBTOTAL 52 ,660. 00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 266 .00 52 , 926. 00 • TOTAL 66, 610. 00 ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY PRICE 1. Clearing & Grubbing LS LS 1,200 . 00 2. Grading 6,585 SF .20 1, 317. 00. 3. Saw Cut A.C. 439 LF 1. 00 439. 00 4. A.C. Pavement . - 6,585 SF 2. 00 13,170. 00 TOTAL 16,126. 00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 1 ,612 .00 17, 738. 00 ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 6 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY PRICE 1. Curb & Gutter 10 LF 10. 00 100. 00 2. Grading (36 'W) 360 SF . 20 72 . 00 3. AC Pavement (12.5 'W) 125 SF 2. 00 250. 00 4. Sawcut 10 LF 1. 00 10. 00 TOTAL 432.00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 43 .00 475. 00 ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 7 (8 = $0 ASSESSMENT) ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY PRICE 1. Curb & Gutter 66 LF 10. 00 660 . 00 2. Sawcut 66 LF 1. 00 66.00 3. Grading (36 'W) 2, 376 SF . 20 475 . 00 4. Clearing & Grubbing LS LS 300.00 5. AC Pavement 825 SF 2. 00 1, 650 . 00 TOTAL 3,151. 00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 315 .00 3,466. 00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 9 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY PRICE 1. Clearing & Grubbing LS LS 300. 00 2. Grading 3 , 384 SF . 20 677. 00 3. Sawcut 94 LF 1.00 9.4. 00 4. Curb & Gutter 94 LF 10. 00 940. 00 5. AC Pavement (12.5'W) 1,175 SF 2. 00 2,350. 00 TOTAL 4, 361. 00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 436 .00 4, 797 . 00 ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 10 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY PRICE 1. Clearing & Grubbing LS LS 300.00 2. Grading 4,932 SF . 20 986 .00 3. Curb & Gutter 137 LF 10. 00 1,370. 00 4. Sawcut 137 LF 1. 00 137. 00 5. AC Pavement (12.5 'W) _1,713 SF 2. 00 3, 426. 00 TOTAL 6, 219. 00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 622 .00 6,840. 00 ENGINEER 'S ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY SAN .RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84-1 11 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT TOTAL ITEM QUANTITY PRICE 1. Clearing & Grubbing LS LS 600. 00 2. Grading 7,992 SF . 20 1,598 . 00 3. Sawcut 222 LF 1. 00 222. 00 4. Curb & Gutter 222 LF 10. 00 2 ,220.00 5. AC Pavement 2,775 SF 2.00 5, 550.00 6. 8"Sewer Line 190 LF 20. 00 3, 800 . 00 7. C.O. & 6" Lat. LS LS 300.00 TOTAL 14 ,290 . 00 CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 1 ,429 .00 15,719. 00 Method of spread of assesments based on benefits derived . I. Area "A": Frontage improvements-west side of San Ramon Rd . and offsite improvemens . Each property owner shall be assessed for the contruction cost plus attendant prorata costs of assessment district costs and incidental costs based on the amount of improvements necessary to widen San Ramon Rd. by one traffic lane plus any utility costs required to extend utility service to those parcels requesting said service plus any required offsite public improvement fees requested by the property owners. II. Area "B": Amador Valley Boulevard Extension and Traffic Signalization. The adjacent three property owners (parcels 1 through 8) shall share in the costs of extending Amador Valley Blvd. to the west from San Ramon Rd. including a new four way traffic signal at Amador Valley Blvd. and San Ramon Rd. and the necessary right of way and incidental and assessment district cost in the following manner . A. Parcels 1 through 4 50 % less a percent equivalent to the value of land lying within the Amador Valley Extension already dedicated to the City of Dublin by Morrison "Homes -spread on a proportionate square foot area of the total of parcel 1 through 4. B. Parcel 5 • Proportion . of area of the sum of parcels 5 through 8 times the remainder of the costs after parcels 1 through .4 spread has been . removed. C. Parcels 6 through 8 Proportion of area of the sum of parcels 5 through 8 the area calculations times the remainder of the costs after parcels 1 through 4 spread has been removed. AFFIDAVITS I, Lee S. Thompson, Engineer of Work of the City of Dublin, do hereby certify that the individual amounts under Assessment on the foregoing pages of this Assessment, have been confired in accordance with the order of the City Council of said City as expressed by Resolution No. , duly adopted by said City on , 1985 . DATED: Lee S. Thompson City Engineer I, Richard Ambrose, City Clerk of the City of Dublin, hereby certify that the foregoing assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on , 1985. Richard Ambrose City Clerk I, Richard Ambrose, City Clerk of the City of Dublin, hereby certify that the foregoing assessment, with the diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City on , 1985 . Richard Ambrose City Clerk I, Lee S. Thompson, Superintendent of Streets of the City of Dublin, hereby certify that the foregoing assessment, together with diagram thereto attached, was recorded in my office on , 1985.. Lee S. Thompson Superintendent of Streets A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAD PURPOSES, BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF THE LANDS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 2806 FILED IN ALAMEDA COUNTY MAP BOOK 109 PAGE 90 , IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: RIGHT OF WAY #1 BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 OF THE LANDS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 2806 (109 M 90) WHICH BEARS S80°29'57"W, 104.95 FEET, ALONG SAID LINE, FROM POINT "A", SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON- TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 370.00 FEET, TO WHICH BEGINNING OF CURVE A RADIAL BEARS N23°27'35"; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 90.14 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE; THENCE ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 2806 (109 M 90 ) , S80 029'57"W, 262.95 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- WESTERLY 19.29 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 26.16 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2 OF PM 2806 (109 M 90 ) ; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE N9 °31 '37"W, 27.9850 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF Pm 2806 (109 M 90) , N80°29 '57"E, 393.22 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. END OF DESCRIPTION ii , _ . . .., ,..,,.,....., . , OtO J : I SCALE; I 100' N9°:31' 37uW :27..99' . s R= 35.00' . I 42°49 07. :p L = :26.16' R - 25.00' �� ,/ a•1 a. 44°13 .12 o0 ro L = 19.30' VD W , . -� , �a l . a10 ® im -\\s\s,\ - to Z R = 370.00' ei I d =!3° 5732 ; , L =.90.14 I 1 rs) to .Nj . L - '. SAN RAMON 'ROAD 1 CITY OF DUBLIN -AMADOR VALLEY :BLVD. EXTENSION -.:R/W — I ACQUISITION PLAT ASSESSMENT ,.DISTRICT 84 - I �' ' SUBMITTED BY_--SA1sTi�f& k : JOB No DWG No. °,�..�c. „!i!3144 APP f' 0 119 DRAWN BY C ENGINE' CHECKED BY 1ST THE RIGHT OF WAY, FOR ROAD PURPOSES, BEING A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF BARDT REFERRED TO IN ALAMEDA COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS, BOOK 7965 PAGE 338, IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: RIGHT OF WAY #2 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS OF BARDT (7695 OR 338) , SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF THE LANDS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 2806 FILED IN ALAMEDA COUNTY MAP BOOK 109 PAGE 90 (THIS POINT WILL BE REFERRED TO HEREAFTER AS POINT "A") ; THENCE S 80°29'57"W, 499.00 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LAND; THENCE N 9°31'37"W, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE SAID LAND, 42.14 - FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CON- CAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET , TO WHICH BEGINNING OF CURVE A RADIAL BEARS S 9°31'37" E; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 27.03 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 19.30 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE; THENCE ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BARDT (7965 OR 338) , N 80°29'57"E, 218 .03 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 195.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 146.16 FEET ALONG .SAID CURVE TO THE BEGIN- NING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 156.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 116.86 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAN RAMON ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S 9°31'37"E , 119.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. END OF DESCRIPTION J - •iith.. 1 ' ' s SCALE: Ill=too' ' `• N9° 31' 37t'.W 42.14' j .A=44°144611. � L='27.03' ' R=25.00' -o o 41_44°13'I o ad , _L=19.30' . W . ti a .,,,. - . t: //' I ' . 1'95.00' . A= 42°56'41'1 " `: L 146:16' iho o . NIP • • N9° 311 37"W . 1i19. SAN RAMON 'ROAD. ' CITY 'OF 'DUBLIN' AAMAD+OR VALLEY BLVD. �• 'EXT ♦� ENScIONT RA,/VII' 2/� ° CQUISI 1 ION PLAT- - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT '84 - :I SUBMITTED BY �iTINA i JOB NO DWG.No. - t69a ► . 01)3144 APP D 19 DRAWN BY ' grit-- . . A l ' g .. . �1TY BNGIN R ? :CHECKED BY let v-Z-tf ST BID SUMMARY Contract 85-3 - Extend Amador Valley Boulevard ITEM ITEM ESTIMATED ENGINEERS EST. REDGWICK GALLAGHER & BURK MCNAMARA CONST. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANITY Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Price Price Price Price 1. Mobilization L.S. 5,000 5,000 4,880 4,880 1,613 1,613 13,400 13,400 2. Traffic Control L.S. 1,500 1,500 5,150 5,150 2,970 2,970 1,300 1,300 3. Construction Staking ' L.S. 3,500 3,500 5,000 5,000 2,970 2,970 6,000 6,000 4. Clearing and Grubbing 4,500 S.Y. .90 4,050 2.50 11,250 1.33 5,985 1.00 4,500 5. Earthwork (Road ' ' , Excavation) 2,700 C.Y. 2.50 6,750 3.15 8,505 8.50 22,950 10.00 27,000 6. Finish Grading 3,300 S.Y. 1.30' 4,290 1.90 6,270 2.00 6,600 2.00 6,600 7. Conc. Curb & Gutter 1,386 L.F. 10.00 13,860 8.00 11,088 11.75 16,285.50 12.00 16,632 8. Conc. Sidewalk Driveway & Handicap Ramp 4,600 S.F. 3.00 13,800 2.00 9,200 3.40 15,640 2.50 11,500 9. Street Pavement Section (Amador Valley Bl) 22,000 S.F. 2.50 55,000 1.32 29,040 1.65 36,300 1.80 39,600 10. Street Pavement Section (6"AC;15 z"AB) (San Ramon Rd. ) 10,400 S.F. 2.50 26,000 2.47 25,688 2.50 26,000 3.00 31,200 11. Median Curb 270 L.F. 7.00 1,890 6.00 1,620 11.00 2,970 12.00 3,240 12. Interlocking Paving Stone 405 S.F. 6.50 2,633 10.00 4,050 9.00 3,645 8.00 3,240 13. Drop Inlet 3 EA. 1,200 3,600 1,200 3,600 1,100 3,300 1,000 3,000 14. Remove Existing Headwall ( & Construct S.D. Manhole 1 EA. 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 1,500 1,500 15. Raise Ex. SSMH Frame & Cover to Grade 1 EA. 500 500 500 500 350 350 200 200 16. 12" RCP CL.III 284 L.F. 15.00 4,260 19.00 5,396 38.00 10,792 20.00 5,680 17. 8" ACP 600 L.F. 18.00 10,800 22.00 13,200 34.00 20,400 20.00 12,000 18. 8" Gate Valve 1 EA. 500 500 1,000 1,000 300 300 500 500 19. Connect Water Main to Existing 1 EA. 750 750 2,500 2,500 500 500 1,800 1,800 20. Asphalt Conc. Island, 6" High 920 S.F. 3.00 2,760 2.70 2,484 1.00 920 3.00 2,760 21. AC Dike, 6" High 210 L.F. 6.00 1,260 2.10 441 4.00 840 5.00 1,050 0 A i iii 0 IF - ITEM ITEM ESTIMATED ENGINEERS EST. REDGWICK GALLAGHER & BURK MCNAMARA CONST. NO. ' DESCRIPTION QUANITY Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Price Price Price Price 22. 2x12 Rough Sawn Heart RWD Header 80 L.F. 4.00 320 7.00 . 560 5.00 400 5.00 400 23. . Striping 4" Broken Yellow Line 420 L.F. .35 147 .40 168 .50 210 .40 168 24. Striping 8" Solid White 410 L.F. .50 205 .80 328 1.00 410 ' .80 328 25. Striping 12" Solid White 545 L.F. .60 327 1.00 545 1.20 654 1.00 545 26. Pavement Markings 6 EA. 25.00 150 30.00 180 35.00 210 30.00 180 27. Abandon Exist Fire Hydrant & Relocate 1 EA. 900.00 900 1,000.00 1,000 ' 1,200.00 1,200 1,500.00 1,500 28. Interim Traffic Signal System L.S. 10,000 10,000 10,000.00 10,000 10,300.00 10,300 10,000.00 10,000 29. Relocate Exist. Wood Fence 195 L.F. 8.00 1,560 20.00 3,900 20.00 3,900 10.00 1,950 30. New Fire Hydrant 1 EA. 1,500 1,500 2,200.00 2,200 1,700.00 1,700 2,000.00 2,000 TOTAL PRICE 179,811.50 171,743.00 203,314.50 207,373.00 n Ir, - FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN THIS DAY OF , 1985. KAY KECK, DEPUTY CITY CLERK CITY OF DUBLIN R C.RDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF DfB'-IN THIS DAY OF , 1985 LEE S. THOMPSON, CITY ENGINEER CITY OF DUBLIN AN ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF D';BLIN ON THE LOTS, PIECES AND PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS - :ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM. SAID ASSESSMENT WAS LEVIED ON THE DAY 1985. REFERENCE IS MADE TO THE 1' ASSESSMENT ROLL RECORDED IN THE 0FICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR THE EXACT AMOUNT OF EACH ASSESSMENT LEVIED AGAINST EACH PARCEL F LAND SHOWN ON THIS ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM. KAY KECK, DEPUTY CITY CLERK CITY OF DUBLIN FILED THIS DAY OF 1985, AT THE HOUR OF O'CLOCK M. IN BOOK OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS AT PAGE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTRY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. RENE' C. DAVIDSON, COUNTY RECORDER IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFCRNIA LEGEND BOUNDARY ASSESSMENT PARCEL LINE QASSESSMENT PARCEL NUMBER NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM RECORD DATA o ° 44 52, W N 24 ASSESSMENT IA A SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -1 CITY OF DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAY, 1995 SCALE I" = 100' SANTINA & THOMPSON INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 1040 OAK GROVE ROAD CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94518 2 43' 8 W s X002 N ?3° sue. As. NO, • • q 001 N V' O ti rn rA lz o SCALE: I"= 100' O v tT_ O, rN 800 09'57"E �^ 0. 84' N 90 31'37 "W 410.40'(408.29) ,x�y_ -� I� N 90 31' 37 "W 44783' 12 13 160.00' 66.00' 94.00' 127 83' o .,� 11 �/ > J m 36.60' w o J OI J c o (� o `t m o� a) v < rn i0 W la O _ o 11.00' 0 1 N 0 w O o N � O z o 9 SBg9 7 59 o_ /3 438.75' 1 40.9' 66.0' C) N 90 31' 37" W 83.14'- =' ' 136.00' R; 2 �8 31 37 W _12314.94' SAN 4RAMON COURSE TABLE o. -� _= l» N I 0-1 ° O d• tJ i�,.r � �I RADIUS DELTA or BEARING LENGTH I N 9 °31'37 "W 119.14' 2 156.00' 42055'07 H 1 1 6.86' ~ 3 1 95.00' 42056'41 " 146.16 N 9° 31' 37" W 261.42' 4 370.00' 13 °57'32" 90.14' 5 N 80° 29' 57" E 218.03' -ED 6 N 80 029' 57" E 262.95' 7 25.00' 44013' 12 19.30' N 8 35.00' 268026'24" 163.98' 9 N 9 031'37 "W 27.99' u� f0 35.00' 181 0 22' 31 " 110.79 o- 11. 35.00' 44014' 46" 27.03' N w 12 35.00' 42 049' II " 26.16' a, - 13 N 9 ° 3 1' 37 " 42.00' z lzr �' N 1 IZ _ o 0 to Z /4+ ` o —� _ _ 50.94 155-49' bmw N 9° 31'37 "W r/ r� -------- G u ASSESSMENT IA A SAN RAMON ROAD SPECIFIC PLAN IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 84 -1 CITY OF DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAY, 1995 SCALE I" = 100' SANTINA & THOMPSON INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 1040 OAK GROVE ROAD CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94518 2 43' 8 W s X002 N ?3° sue. As. NO, • • q 001 N V' O ti rn rA lz o SCALE: I"= 100' O v tT_ O, rN 800 09'57"E �^ 0. 84' N 90 31'37 "W 410.40'(408.29) ,x�y_ -� I� N 90 31' 37 "W 44783' 12 13 160.00' 66.00' 94.00' 127 83' o .,� 11 �/ > J m 36.60' w o J OI J c o (� o `t m o� a) v < rn i0 W la O _ o 11.00' 0 1 N 0 w O o N � O z o 9 SBg9 7 59 o_ /3 438.75' 1 40.9' 66.0' C) N 90 31' 37" W 83.14'- =' ' 136.00' R; 2 �8 31 37 W _12314.94' SAN 4RAMON z -4 _rl _ co ° m cn N — ? N O QO m 0 A sdi° _ /0 .'q N s 'oo s° 'p c w o. -� _= l» N I 0-1 ° O d• tJ i�,.r � �I m z -4 _rl _ co ° m cn N — ? N O QO m 0 A sdi° _ /0 .'q N s 'oo s° 'p c O / N ® 0 iJ SO O - `Jo m C) o ao N '' 11z o% N° ON .L N� 9° S, 221.33' \u' S 90 31' 48" E SHEET OF SHEETS Jj44 titNTED JUL 21985 i Jj44 titNTED JUL 21985