HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.2 MAD 86-1 EngRpt CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
City Council Meeting -Date: June 25, 1990
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Landscaping and Lighting District
No. 1986-1 (Tract 5511)
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1) Engineer' s Report
2) Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming
Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessment
3) Assessment Diagram
RECOMMENDATION: ) Open public hearing
2) Receive Staff report and public testimony
� � 3) Question Staff and the public
4) Close public hearing and deliberate
, 5) Adopt Resolution Approving Engineer' s Report, Confirming
Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessment
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: $120 per single-family property owners and $60 per multi-
family unit to be assessed for 1990-91 landscaping and
lighting maintenance costs, for a total assessment of
$78,180. No cost to the City. _
DESCRIPTION:
As part of the review and approval of the Villages' 145-unit single family
development (Village VI) and the other, multi-family phases, certain landscaping
and open space maintenance was made a condition of approval. This Maintenance
Assessment District provides funds for this work. The City Council approved
formation of the District on November 10, 1986, with the initial assessment in the
1987-88 tax year.
The County Assessor collects these monies for the City for the maintenance of
landscaping and irrigation systems, right-of-way fencing, and walls and entrance
signs. The open space parcel maintenance was charged to the District for three
years only, similar to the agreement made for Tract 4719. The 1989-90 year was
the third and final year that the District paid for open space maintenance, and
that cost will now be paid from the City' s park maintenance budget. The
District' s boundaries include all of Tract 5511.
This year's assessment is proposed to be $120 per single-family lot and $60 per
multi-family unit, which is the same as last year' s assessment. The costs
projected for 1990-91 exceed the estimated revenue generated by $8,418. The
shortfall will reduce the accumulated reserve. The reserve for 1989-90 increased
substantially by the end of the year to a projected $111,465 due to the delay in
accepting landscaping along Dougherty Road north of Willow Creek Drive and along
Fall Creek Road.
On April 9, 1990, the City Council authorized preparation of the Preliminary
Engineer' s Report which is attached to this agenda statement. On June 11th, the
City Council adopted resolutions approving the preliminary Engineer' s Report and
setting June 25, 1990, as the date of the protest hearing. Notice of the hearing
was published, posted, and mailed to property owners in accordance with Government
Code regulations.
Staff held an informational meeting with interested property owners on June 19th
in order to explain the scope of work and answer any questions. One homeowner
attended the meeting and asked some general questions pertaining to formulation of
the assessment.
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and
adopt the resolution.
ITEM NO. 61.2, COPIES TO: Rafanelli & Nahas
Standard Pacific
J.L. Construction
CITY OF DUBLIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1986-1
(TRACT 5511)
FISCAL YEAR 1990-91
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CONTENTS
1. Assessment: Including Scope of Work, Estimate of Costs,
Assessment Roll, and Method of Apportioning
2. Assessment Diagram
•
•
ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, on April 9, 1990, the City Council of the City of Dublin,
California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972, adopted its Resolution Directing Preparation of Annual Report for
Maintenance Assessment District for the maintenance of improvements more
particularly therein described; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned to prepare and file a
report pursuant to Section 22565, et. seq. of said Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me
under said Act and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the
following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of the
maintenance of said improvements and the cost and expenses incidental thereto, to
be paid by said District.
ESTIMATE OF COSTS
(1) (2) (3)
As Filed As Preliminarily As Finally
Approved Approved
Cost of Maintenance $ 85,360 $ 85,360 $
Incidental Expenses $ 112,285 $ 112,285 $
TOTAL COST: $ 197,645 $ 197,645 $
Est. 1989-90 Interest Income
Applied to 1990-91
Operating Costs $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $
Est. Surplus from 1989-90
Fiscal Year $ 111,465 $ 111,465 $
NET TO BE ASSESSED FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 $ 78,180 $ 78,180 $
As required by said Act, a diagram is hereto attached showing the
exterior boundaries of said landscaping maintenance assessment district and also
the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within said landscaping
maintenance assessment district as the same existed at the time of the passage of
said resolution, each of which lots or parcels having been given a separate
number upon said diagram.
I do hereby assess the net amount to be assessed upon all assessable
lots or parcels of land within said landscaping maintenance assessment district
by apportioning that amount among the several lots or parcels in proportion to
-2-
the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the
maintenance of said improvements, and more particularly set forth in the list
hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.
Said assessment is made upon the several lots or parcels of land within
said landscaping maintenance assessment district in proportion to the estimated
benefits to be received by said lots or parcels respectively from the maintenance
of said improvements. The diagram and assessment numbers appearing herein are
the diagram numbers appearing on said diagram, to which reference is hereby made
for a more particular description of said property.
Each lot or parcel of land assessed is described in the assessment list
by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor' s Maps of the County
of Alameda for the fiscal year 1990-1991 and includes all of such parcel
excepting those portions thereof within existing public roads or right-of-way to
be acquired in these proceedings for public road purposes. For a more particular
description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on
file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Because
the names of the several owners are unknown to me, I hereby place the word
"Unknown" opposite the number of each lot or parcel of land assessed, the amount
assessed thereon, and the number of the assessment.
Dated: June 20, 1990 y /a
y=''
C i t Engine-
-3-
•
SCOPE OF WORK
The following areas are to be maintained by this Maintenance Assessment District:
1) The median and roadside landscaping along the north side of the street for
the entire length of Willow Creek Drive.
2) Roadside landscaping along Shady Creek Drive within Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
15, 16, 37, 38, and south of Lot 145, all within Tract 5511.
3) Roadside landscaping, wall, fence, and pathway improvements along the west
side of Dougherty Road between Amador Valley Boulevard and the northerly City
Limit line, and along the north side of Amador Valley Boulevard between Dougherty
Road and Wildwood Road.
4) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west side of
Wildwood Road.
5) Roadside landscaping, fence, wall, and pathway improvements along the west , . -
side of Dougherty Road and the south side of Amador Valley Boulevard adjacent to
Lot 150.
6) Roadside landscaping, fence, and pathway improvements along the west and
north sides of Fall Creek Road.
-4-
ENGINEER' S COST ESTIMATE
FISCAL YEAR 1990-91
The estimated cost for the maintenance of improvements described in this Report
for the fiscal year 1990-91 is as follows:
Maintenance
1. Weeding, fertilizing, pruning, plant replacement,
irrigation system: $ 67,135
2. Utilities: 18,225
$ 85,360
Incidentals
1. Engineer' s Report and Proceedings $ 4,000
2. Cost of Collection (County of Alameda) 1,329
3. Delinquencies 3,909
4. Contingencies/Reserve 103,047
$ 112,285
Total $ 197,645
-5-
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Amount of Assessment
Assessment and Lot No. Property Owners 1990-91 Tax Year
Lots 1-145 (Village VI) Unknown $120 per lot = $17,400
Lot 150 (Village I) Unknown $ 3,360
Lot 151 (Commercial Corner) Unknown $ 480
Lot 149 (Village II) Unknown $14,880
Lot 148 (Village III) Unknown $13,440
Lot 146A (Village IV) Unknown $ 8,100
Lot 146B (Village V) Unknown $12,240
Lots 152-177 (Village VII) Unknown $60 per D.U. _ $ 8,280
$78,180
-6-
METHOD OF APPORTIONING
Each single family lot shall be assigned a benefit unit of one, each multifamily
unit assigned a benefit unit of one-half, the commercial lot shall have a benefit
unit of 4, and the open space lots shall have a benefit unit of zero. This gives
the following benefit units and apportionments for each Village for this Fiscal
Year:
Number of Benefit % of Total
Living Units Units Assessment
Lot 150, Village I 56 28 4.30
Lot 149, Village II 248 124 19.03
Lot 148, Village III 224 112 17.19
Lot 146A, Village IV 135 67.5 10.36
Lot 146B, Village V 204 102 15. 66
Lots 1-145, Village VI 145 145 22.26
Lots 152-177, Village VII 138 69 10.59
Lot 151, Commercial 0 4 0.61
Lots A - D, Open Space 0 0 0.00
Total: 1,150 651.5 100.00
-7-
CITY OF DUBLIN
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1
CERTIFICATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 1990-91
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the
foregoing Engineer' s Report, including Assessment, in the amounts set forth in
Column (1) , with the diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on June 7, 1990
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the
foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was preliminarily
approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No.
63-90 duly adopted by said Council on June 11, 1990.
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that the
foregoing Assessment, with the diagram thereto attached, was finally approved and
confirmed by the City Council of said City by its Resolution No. -90 duly
adopted by said Council on , 1990.
I, the City Clerk of the City of Dublin, California, hereby certify that a
certified copy of the assessment and diagram was filed in the office of the
County Auditor of the County of Alameda, California, on
1990.
-8-
RESOLUTION NO. -90
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,
AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT
CITY OF DUBLIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1986-1
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 37-90, a resolution directing
preparation of Annual Report for Maintenance Assessment District, City of
Dublin Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 1986-1
(the "district") , this Council designated the City Engineer as Engineer and -
ordered that Engineer to make and file a report in writing in accordance with
and pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City
Clerk a preliminary report in writing as called for, which report was
presented to the City Council on June 11, 1990; and
WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has filed with the City Clerk an
Engineer' s Report for final consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered said Report and
each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said
Report is sufficient; and that said Report nor any part thereof requires
modification in any respect;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
a) That the Engineer' s estimate of the itemized and total costs
and expenses of maintaining said improvements and of the incidental expenses
in connection therewith, be; and each of them are hereby finally approved;
b) That the diagram showing the assessment district, description
of improvements to be maintained; and the boundaries and dimensions of the
respective lots and parcels of land within said district as contained in said
district as contained in said report be, and it is hereby finally approved;
c) The assessment of the total amount of cost and expenses of
the proposed maintenance of said improvements upon the several lots and
parcels of land in said District in proportion to the estimated benefits to
be received by such lots and parcels, respectively, from said maintenance and
tr-l?;. u 'a'2 Z--.07
of the expenses incidental thereto, as contained in said report be, and they
are hereby finally approved and those assessments are hereby ordered levied
as contained in said reports.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 25th day of June, 1990.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
9
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
CURVE
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
TANGENT
1
N 27.40'32'W
83.56
1
90'00'00'
50.00
78.54
50.00
2
N 27'40'32'W
288.82
2
38.03'08'
540.00
339.78
175.73
3
N 88'46'5B'W
25.00
3
38'03'00'
480.00
289.45
i49.B9
4
N 88'48'58'W
59.11
4
90.00'00'
50.00
78.54
50.00
5
N 34'50'080W
550.00
5
3'31'25'
1555.00
95.83
47.83
6
N 08'38'30'M
65.89
6
18'05'24'
1555.00
438.88
219.79
7
N 08'38'30'W
180.00
7
38'03'08'
508.00
318.39
184.88
8
N 88.15 *05'E
52.12
9
N 88'15'05 "E
135.54
10
N 19'27'38'N
158.35
ii
N 55'09'54'E
290.08
12
N 88.46'58'W
59.11
13
N 88'48'58'M
25.00
14
N 15'20'00'W
210.87
15
N 17'18.280E
294.93
200150100 50 0
200
i8
N 00'22'26'W
180.07
17
N 88'48'58'W
153.11
18
N BO'29'57'E
50.00
SCALE IN FEET
i9
N 29'30'030W
20.96
FOUND ALAMEDA COUNTY
MO/JUMENT 79 -2
400
DOUGNERTy ROAD
- O "
M
N N 1217'-
!! N X1.68'
_ - N11.48 eRrY ROAD
00 e- 1s's9'92' L' 54 W�DEN�ND
t,
14G A.
14G B
cR -
_ ` FALL
" LOT 'E '
� h
o
¢ n m 1 N c.
�Ap y
U O
m
0 O N
^ C/ a
m �
FOUND ALAMED/CONTR COSTA
COUNTY MONUMENT "79 -1'
LOT 'A'
CHORD CHORD BRG
70.71 N 48'13'02'E
334.21 N 73'ii'280E
284.89 N 73'SS'28'E
70.71 N 43'48'58'W
95.82 N 13'34'17'W
435.25 N 09'15'44'E
313.18 N 73'ii'28'E
X11
Li � � CAMP 194RKS
LOT 'C
1
1 �
1 �
1 1
1
/ W 1
GR
V 167N 1Ty ✓ -410
A T. 5.
OT
1
\
1
1�
0
II
♦ Z.
Street Lighting Mmaintenance
Assessment S
CAMP PARKS
146 A I �1
LOT
0 � (� I Z
Co .A .. PM 457 \
70 ' C EASEMENT �\ \
m N �� _ - \ SEE DETAIL B `
SHEET 2 OF 2 �
Co
\ rn O
-jN nllo /
1;3 m a �.M 1 1 SEE DETAIL A -\
CU s ROAD
CU N °� r\ SHEET 2 OF 2\ `
U /RREL CIRCLE j - - - - --
a m cv m a in MO M \ \ / LOT "G' ,
M m m m L.M.L�.....Y L^^' ✓ �DO
•.'1)0 ON .
m )
^Co�mly v1v
„
LOT 153 TRACT 4719- -142 M 41
BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE LINE BETWEEN THE FOUND STREET MONUMENTS
ALONG THE MONUMENT LINE OF DOUGHERTY ROAD,
TAKEN AS N01 *13'02'E. PER P.M.4575
BOOK 155 MAPS, PAGE 97.
1
ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL Iq
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
I PARCEL ..0 SERIES NO 84- 076934
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
(12l -5190
150
m`
o
0
ILOT
D' Vi
x
0
ti
n
a
2
0
Q
Niv- T 411'
w6 OT 153 TRA41 NOTES: i
L/ )42 M E }?ETES AND 3OL:IC - :ESCRI ?T- ,N JF
-_S DISTRICT ARE - SAME 'IS _:iCSc
r2T Tii
6 S .0 oDE D :ND RESER�iED
S E = AR SHOWN
._
MAP P Iii =, -- 'CT
CT MAP 6100
., -,:N , 1985 REVISION: ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT LOT 1417 Di';--:)ED INTO LOTS
THROUGH 177 AND LOTS I THROUGH
:W. LOT '_43 DT ,,'I -'1T0 LOTS 1:81
..iD LOT
I-NE, 1939 REVISIOLI: ASSESSMENT
�- STRICT LOTS '46A AND 146B WERE
.: ?:E:iED INTO THE DISTRICT. LOT
=9, AND LOTS 152-177 & LOTS 1 - +v
:ERE SUBDIVIDED INTO CONDOMINIUMS
=.5 SHOWN ON SHEET 2 DETAILS B Ai1D
A RESPECTIVELY. LO=S 77 -79 AND
LOTS B, C,E,F AND G WERE AD.USTED
FOR LOT LINES.
PRINTED SHEET 1 OF 2
Somme and Thwnpm. lw,,.
C03345
m
mlmllm
m
V 167N 1Ty ✓ -410
A T. 5.
OT
1
\
1
1�
0
II
♦ Z.
Street Lighting Mmaintenance
Assessment S
CAMP PARKS
146 A I �1
LOT
0 � (� I Z
Co .A .. PM 457 \
70 ' C EASEMENT �\ \
m N �� _ - \ SEE DETAIL B `
SHEET 2 OF 2 �
Co
\ rn O
-jN nllo /
1;3 m a �.M 1 1 SEE DETAIL A -\
CU s ROAD
CU N °� r\ SHEET 2 OF 2\ `
U /RREL CIRCLE j - - - - --
a m cv m a in MO M \ \ / LOT "G' ,
M m m m L.M.L�.....Y L^^' ✓ �DO
•.'1)0 ON .
m )
^Co�mly v1v
„
LOT 153 TRACT 4719- -142 M 41
BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE LINE BETWEEN THE FOUND STREET MONUMENTS
ALONG THE MONUMENT LINE OF DOUGHERTY ROAD,
TAKEN AS N01 *13'02'E. PER P.M.4575
BOOK 155 MAPS, PAGE 97.
1
ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL Iq
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
I PARCEL ..0 SERIES NO 84- 076934
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
(12l -5190
150
m`
o
0
ILOT
D' Vi
x
0
ti
n
a
2
0
Q
Niv- T 411'
w6 OT 153 TRA41 NOTES: i
L/ )42 M E }?ETES AND 3OL:IC - :ESCRI ?T- ,N JF
-_S DISTRICT ARE - SAME 'IS _:iCSc
r2T Tii
6 S .0 oDE D :ND RESER�iED
S E = AR SHOWN
._
MAP P Iii =, -- 'CT
CT MAP 6100
., -,:N , 1985 REVISION: ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT LOT 1417 Di';--:)ED INTO LOTS
THROUGH 177 AND LOTS I THROUGH
:W. LOT '_43 DT ,,'I -'1T0 LOTS 1:81
..iD LOT
I-NE, 1939 REVISIOLI: ASSESSMENT
�- STRICT LOTS '46A AND 146B WERE
.: ?:E:iED INTO THE DISTRICT. LOT
=9, AND LOTS 152-177 & LOTS 1 - +v
:ERE SUBDIVIDED INTO CONDOMINIUMS
=.5 SHOWN ON SHEET 2 DETAILS B Ai1D
A RESPECTIVELY. LO=S 77 -79 AND
LOTS B, C,E,F AND G WERE AD.USTED
FOR LOT LINES.
PRINTED SHEET 1 OF 2
Somme and Thwnpm. lw,,.
C03345
I
C NUMBERS ARE
FOLLOWED BY A
P NUMBER; OR 'b)
iYPHEN AND THE
)MMON AREAS; OR
[YPHEN AND THE
MON AREAS.
r NUMBERS ARE
BUILDING NUMBER
WIT LETTER; OR
Y A HYPHEN;-AND
MON AREAS.
0
0
O
J
G
Y.vY% d' o Yr 2a ik rvw -u=v3
Street > A g 1
mi 9 n g
Assessment Distr4ct 86-1
�Q
y9
n
f{
t -r �
ci� Co
l3�C
u9f
F�r� CiB
•'S.9
1tll� /_i5 D
GCr�i
E`i
J \�A
l.6, c 9 4
GJ77711//''
9jG
G N
� n6�Cfi \ ?J
ff
eye
G`o, �JG
�9 / A
L o5 <J
A 44
143 O
NT E 142
14 H ASSESSMENT
F 42
139 G DISTRICT
B 139
139 C LOT
BLDG
6570 NUMBER
N
6570G
COMM 250
AREA N —COMM
f
4
F � H
C
eL o
r�
�CJcffcJ
lot a9
/:9 fCAcrl
p
,5
L8 /1
F \91�G
J Oc
e�uG.6` -oz
� 6 F
fo )
(9
SCALE: 1"= 200'
:r
D H L K G C
1J- 8�
\ %�81 \J 3Z / \J
A E I J F 8
P C! L]LI
D H L K� G C
rt /31iv��:!7 rq�4
CJ�J
r 5 i:J, 7B17��5f �5
A E I J F 8
Pk Lam. 6-,dl
AG
p o6f (@ C
o�cG 6t
16
;�by5
8 F E A
C G H D
E, DG 6558
Co
r4)
179 \�J� b'S6
14Plv�0
i
BLVD.
n
ix
r
Ld
w
X
C9
O
0
is
PRINTED
JUN 191990
SaNim and ihemmn, tnr„
SHEET 2 OF 2
LH G
q $l8 (j�i
°c E•, 9
E
D�ti� A
B
F
P: DG LLU9
\, {h l {
,�
c'I J B
C G- �6 6
g
G F 6D F
z D
K / \J �i )
L (S) 01
D H G C
p 53�Jp
7D9 (1c6
018607603
P, C.1 Ca6
A E F 8
K CG 651.
C�51r52 B
5✓ •�J
G r:9 50 F
K .47 S8 J
L t5 46 1
�0
'�1C.7'0
O H 45 S4 E
33 35 �J
39 D,•4/ a2 A
A E F
B
e�oc6ae
eLOeee�z ,fr
BLVD.
n
ix
r
Ld
w
X
C9
O
0
is
PRINTED
JUN 191990
SaNim and ihemmn, tnr„
SHEET 2 OF 2