Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.6 1984-85 Budget Modifications CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 12, 1985 SUBJECT 1984-85 Budget Modifications EXHIBITS ATTACHED Budget Change Forms RECOMMENDATION Approve Budget transfers and additional appropriations FINANCIAL STATEMENT: See Below DESCRIPTION The City presently accounts for expenditures and revenues on a modified accrual basis . This means that the City incurs expense during the fiscal year based on the criteria of delivery of goods or the provision of service within that fiscal year, even if the billing is not received until after the close of the fiscal year . This makes it difficult to anticipate some budget modifications until all of the accrued expenses have been accounted for . During the process of closing the books for Fiscal Year 1984-85, Staff has identified several accounts that will exceed the previously approved 1984-85 budget. These overruns cannot be taken care of at an administrative level because it would either require a transfer from another activity account, or exceeds the $2 , 500 limit the City Manager can presently transfer within any individual activity account. As indicated in the attached budget change forms, there are in some cases sufficient funds within an activity ' s budget to transfer to those sub- accounts which may be lacking sufficient funds . For example, in the Police Contract Services Personnel Account adequate unexpended funds are available to cover the budget overrun in the Dispatch Account. Those activity budgets which will require transfers of this kind include the City Manager ' s budget, Legal Services budget, Police Services budget, Animal Control budget, Street Maintenance budget, Recreation budget, and the Planning budget. There are other activity budgets that do not have sufficient funds budgeted to cover anticipated expenditures incurred during 1984-85 . These include the Finance budget, Beautification budget, Engineering Services budget, and the Traffic Signals & Street Lighting budget. These budgets will either require a transfer from another activity account, or a transfer from a reserve account. The most significant transfer of this type which is required occurs in the Engineering budget . As indicated on the budget change form, the increased cost of Engineering Services budget was primarily due to the increased level of development activity which is covered by fees, and the overall additional demand for general engineering services from the public, City Council and City Manager ' s office. In addition to the need to transfer funds to cover cost overruns , there is also a need for additional appropriations in capital project accounts . The budgets for these capital projects were overrun for a variety of reasons . An explanation for each overrun is indicated on each project ' s respective budget change form. The San Ramon Road Specific Plan Assessment District and Landscape Maintenance District 83-2 (Stagecoach Road) both had budget overruns . The cost of these expenditures will be paid by assessments levied on the specific properties . The budget overrun will require an appropriation from the fund balance . It is recommended that the City Council review the Budget change forms and authorize the Mayor to execute the Budget transfers and additional appropriations . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- COPIES TO: ITEM NO. �. P 2 c i CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHANCE FOFT1 FROM I TO APPROPRIATION /,7— TRANSFER ACCOUNT Pt�OL'i ACCOU�► t 0`�— x-05".a � 1-7 AjmENCm NT _ - j i` O --+fl 1, 69 43 0 JUSTIFICATION FOR CHMCE 1}- p 1 1�,Q.1\�Q.Yrte,.fit c.{�PQrs to C� ` GL� ��lLe tti S e- �n 0vurv � , �1�e �cG�i e r a .zizP 'Pfi�' o� l 1 1 1 , rP e se(-Ns 4 ,e. CO tiT v� e 1— dE COSIS .S�-`1 �}� � �� o�c �eS o� 3y3o - TO I AL L=.it CITY tACEER AFFROVAL � I,A. tt ' CITv COUI4Cjt iWFRGVAL 1 �r CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHPINCE FORM FRCM TO APPRCPR I AT I CN Af' Ui IT ACCOt;``T _ TRANSFER P------- _ _ r7 Pr'FUlri!ENT JUSTIFICATION FOR CPANGE ccset\j er A,c CC)o�" ro� �}� yf� �Q � 1� b co•rec-e� `� 1. 1 . ITv lI 7 COSTS n i fT TOTAL CITY h'Ar cR AFFROVAL DATE CI T`; COl!IvCIt�/Pr, RO/AL CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CMICE FORM FRCM I 'TO APPRCPRIAiICN - �cco�rri ar���rrr accoUtirr ArJ;��►� _ VSFER JUSTIFIC4TICN FOR CPANGE 1 secJlLe5 0 - of C'o S��q i�ne I C 3 9 bopi�.5, r2 IS�11 � (R� ��e '0 4-ri ,ncfease ,v\. p. S pA �o w..ce- aUVV�;T �2(�octA 'YOt -�-fo.ns,ef`� OCGJ�aV�`l.U, I-FE-112E. COSTS TOTAL CITY FAMOER F OVAL LATE - CIlY CGl!I�C��Pr, RG/P.L C 2— CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHANGE FORM FRCM I TO APPRCPRIATICN . TRAINSFER ACCOUNT AFGUNi i ACCOUtiT Pf'i�l iii J JUSTIFICATION FOR CN�Pi`ICE � \e es . lke- Volvyv"e wa-5 're.Je-c- -�1�°�. c. e CZ Co .-�- SecJices ITv II iE COSTS s cLS p °° fi T071 AL CITY MACER AFFROVAL 0..'3[� �� . . ... - 2� - CITY, COUNCjriAFFROVA.L c CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CNANCE FORM FROM I TO /-I A°PRCPRIATICN pfIrl:t� ACCOUNT AI�QUi r ACCGL', TRANSFER o0 0 6 . D I 3 f5$ �. . JUST IFIC4TION FOR CPANGE ^ o e- -rr o C C. Z n,A al• �1 v�� j r�,t�ct?,c�S Cc►� cL s re.SO p�„d � 'vim n7 �� „�1� � ���`"1��2 S �c.G�u.N �- �-s Go vt... •- 4A",�s jz,lj% COSTS �o T071 AL I zi LA►c CJY AAGER AFFROVAL - (7,& CI►Y COUNC Ir,ArFRGVA.L DAit. - CITY OF DUBLIN BInG-c CNANICE FORi'1 FRCM TO APPRCPRIATICN ACCOUlf a,`00�r ACCOUNT /-7 AmENDMENI T s t-1— o . 1— 30 JUSTIFI MON FOR CPANCEI � 2, exce- JeJ 4j Laic �l;l� � P 1:.>>�r w�.. � s P��.. w e eo` a��'e r�,�,�" !�o��r�e� 't�. � ��Y . • ct c'cave"' I °lIL COSTS IQ�on- i TM AL I Li I CITY i�Ar GER AFFROVAL D ' C� �6 � � DAIS CI T`; C0U.I CICAp Rio 1A.L CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CNANGE FOR•1 FROM I TO .�7 APPRCPRIATICN TRANSFER 00 Al�OU►T I A.CCGL`I Pf'irLifl 00 �) o �7 A-f-NOrLNT JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE C,��S ro�r.,c�� 0.�P C o �Ec� 19 ��v ��t.e G- 1 y cv�� a�,,,o ��2.0�' oS O�.�n �,r��ec�w�, �ecCea�� r`.���ec�fl I', k?�e ► ° ITv°lI%` COSTS 1 ray°SSo►.¢� <ecJ TG AL FF�iOVA.L DATE . CITY LACER A CITv COUNCjt�7APFROVAL CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHANGE FORM FRCrt TO /-7 APPROPRIATION � TRANSFER ACCOUNT AVOUNT ACCOUN Pf'I✓U«-1 f7 ar E - b 2 o I) � a o �otq IOET ' JUST IFICATION FOR CRANGE b l a.�no vv`�� ptv� -�-o �r,�.,�'.c� P o�e.� ����?• -���.rn �a ,c. f?c�,�e S, 3 yl \Pp-(e� rY• 4 e t'°sans b!A I-lIL COSTS ° no CITY r,P:VACER AFFROVFL b 3 -� 'fJ CYr/AF°RGVAL DAit l CIt , COLS coy 1 CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CNA`iCE FORM FRCM I TO j pPPRCPRIATICN _ ACCOUNT pr�QU(`�i ACCOUNT PrI✓Lr�i TRAi`ISFER o0 . of ` 9i Doo o �_�_qo3- x-05. 05 �joo) 1q1 o� 1-►- aoi-�lo 0 /7 p,"IENL�`'�VT �-`-.901– x-05, 05 y�� `T 85 — cto 3_ i5 4 -�- go► -7'OI , 01 a �f0q °= JUSTIFICATION FOR UNGE - ►xc level c,4 - ` �evQ� J � k5p, oo b I Cox� ,n..� 1 , 4 < 1 Ls of �, �;��re -Fo r P I,,r,sc' tea S4or - COSTS O j l9l 0 p ��o�esS�o Serv�e5 � 0 0 T��ALIno a �'� r F�F�OVAL Y,t C i►Y � tp'c_ R P , b ' 3 D E CITv c0U(JCt'AFFROVAL CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHANCE FORM FRCM I TO 7 APPRCPR I AT I CN Af'ivUfCl 7 TRANSFER ACCOIii`ff AMON 1-.3 -020 -900- 7aS 0 . s JSTIFIG4TION FOR C�'�AN%E -1�e, eS�G�R o-na �`�ta �' Q` A ��o+ d-�*`L :tvt�t.•,..rfi_ o_c4A( was IS r,�re�'S l lIL COSTS 07 p 't-D�.0 JectCfS I CITY WlAGER AFFROVAL Dais . CI-i,, COl!NCYj�7AFFR0VA.L , CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHANCE FORM FRCM TO rI APPRCPRIATICN ACCOUff TNSFER ACACCOUNT RA 5 770 f7 A"'oI mENI T JUSTIFICATION FOR CPANGE n � t �� ,� �,�r,��- �K ���►� 4� 0.'-i L l Ce�w2 OD RI b�d�•e�� ��� �n 0.� �ncce,aSe �• E U�- j :- ` V;llO-Ce�a.rk a .� � / co����- W�.S c-e. �� � �o b e fe(�la�•e.o�� Q.h.o� .. re�2G�" Sarver o� -fie � � Mote- ce.JP-V-t JP �,u,,,� �z o���� +��- wca a.�,�, P I IIZ` COST S - i I. Tu►AL DATE C i T Y r"AMPIGER PF, CITY COLI4Q7APCMOVA.L DA Ht c CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CHA`iCE FORM FROM I TO /-I APPRCPRIATICN TRANSrER ACCOUNT A�-OUNT ACCOUNT TJ arIsNaENT a_,y Dos.VS— JUSTIFICMON FOR CHANCE 3- I L o-. j y n t v c f ec� rri��� l eX�e n ci ��Ire- f� � CA c O'S `a r u1�Ef - n o r m o a I�►4` 17ENIL COSTS TGCAL -? 7. I DA.i CITY �?AmcER AFMOVAL I;A ATE CITy COUI4CIt�7AFFROVA.L . CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CPANCE FON l FROM I TO �7 APPRCPRIASICN ACCOUNT P��QU►r ACCGU\T 14�4'�.' 3oo y 3 — I — 55 4-0 o 5 . l a - R CN�Pt C J�1 TIFIaTIOiV FOR APPro o.�'��n 'S eca•�;� C � Pco.��-S - R�s�F�J2, -To Q 11 rr ...r�' Rea-`-O+� \ ' '� n.�c�►ce�' ed e .. \ M.O�►•.S'.c:J�n�.c� were.(•ec�wc o ' {tcld �:. .�dc✓�Wa s ���nC ci� fs COT, C- T evY+�1P S ,1 `` was mVl,red+e r�a.r� car e�ecoc�e�.h,e,�T (aaa4` Teo . �o�. ST, �aMC A �Da w, or �;1:C1• C `� ',�> -ire p�e�eo woo�c� \.e eo.,?1� 4,c c c o e A LA �+.a n R\j 6 co �:;�. �� lie ►55 °1 CO sis °1 Y�o j� G-�� p�t)Lit 0 00 ` 6 i- Tti,AL I Vii C D� C i T Y i �-NAC�R PF, ROVAL CITY COI;NCjt/WFROVAL DA it CITY OF DUBLIN BUDGET CNAINCE FORM FROM I TO �7 A°PROPRIATION . ACCOUNT Ai�OU►fi RCCGL'ti I Pr'�:Lfff -7 ar�,ui✓����T 3 -oo��- -V-30 S�2-0 3- 2`t �s► - os Saoo 0o � o 0 t� T.f D rte. e A e r u IUSTIFIC4TION FOR CHANGE 7F,"I, Ae. 0(�.O o.a P q�� A l O� Q.t J� �' '�epp C.l C. �1 11 1 V hC CO IA DT ?D[e�Io�t 5�-�eS o. I Ic I "J i n , rneakc•v��SMS , cLi eve. djCt n�, '_cJ:eeS �JeCe cttu.,C 17L NEE COSTS o0 10AL I lt Sj ADO LATE b, �o� $� CITY ��ArIAGE,R AFFROVAL -1 71 CIS COU«CfriAPFROVAL. �i. �� af�GD��•�-�'�-1 �(i%tee- ,