HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.1 Oakmont Memorial Park Appeal x450- 5D
AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE: September 26, 1983
SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning Commission decision
on Planning Application PA 83-029 =-
Oakmont (Memorial Park
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1. Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis
2. Appeal Letter
3. Resolution of Planning Commission
approving application
4 . Minutes of Planning Commission
meeting
5. Letter, dated September 22, 1983,
from Dublin Chamber of Commerce
RECOMMENDATION: 1. Hear Staff Presentation
2. Open public hearing
3. Hear applicant and public
presentations
4 . Close public hearing
5. Adopt Resolution adopting Negative
Declaration
6. Adopt Resolution denying
application
,IN-2NCIAL STATEMENT: None
DESCRIPTION: I- BACKGROUND
Oakmont Memorial Park, the applicant, is applying for
Conditional Use Permit to allow a mortuary at 7400 San Ramon
Rd- The site is in an area designated for Retail
Commercial/Shopper Goods use by the San Ramon Road Specific
Plan. The mortuary would serve 100 families and conduct 60
funeral services during the first year of operation. All
funeral processions would travel south on San Ramon Road to
Highway 580, and then go to the appropriate cemetery.
On September 6, 1983, tine Planning Commission: revie;.Iied
the application- A member of the public spoke in favor of
the application.
The Planning Commission, by a 4 to 1 vote, approved the
application with the following adjustments to the draft
conditions of approval:
- Condition 1-a- : Parking to be provided for 20 cars
rather than 50 cars.
- Condition 2 .a- : Allow for a performance bond or letter
of credit.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ITE:: ii0. �� COPIES TO: Applicant
Property Owner
Funeral services may require on-site parking for up to
60 cars . The proposed parking layout would need to be
redesigned, and even then, might not be large enough to
accommodate the number of cars reasonably expected to attend
the funeral services .
When the funeral procession exits the site, traffic
problems would probably occur as cars attempt to enter
traffic lanes and travel down San Ramon Road. The street is
one of the busiest in the City and is expected to carry more
traffic in the future .
3 . Effective Time Period: If the application is
approved, the permit should be on a limited time basis
rather than a long-term basis _ A two year time period would
provide the City an opportunity to consider and respond to
any changes in conditions that might affect the permit _
III _ RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the
appeal and deny the application, because the proposed use
does not conform to .the San. Ramon .Road Specific Plan, and
because of potential traffic and parking problems .
Should the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission that the application is a retail
commercial/shooper goods use, Staff would recommend denying
the appeal and approving the application subject to
conditions of approval . The Conditions are designed to
assure that the project conforms as much as possible to the
requirements for retail uses and future retail developments
as required by the Specific Plan .
CITY OF DUBLIN
MEMORANDUM
PRE-HEARING STAFF ANALYSIS
Meeting Date : September .6 , 1983
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Staff
SUBJECT: PA 83-029 Oakmont Memorial Park Conditional
Use Permit to operate 'a mortuary on property
designated for Retail Use in the San Ramon
Road Specific Plan Area
GENERAL INFORMATION
PROJECT: This is a request fora Conditional Use Permit to
allow the operation of a mortuary on property .
formerly used, by Valley Christian Church, as a'
church. The site is governed by the San Ramon
Road Specific Plan, which indicates that the
property should be used for retail uses .
APPLICANT: Oakmont Memorial Park
PO Box 417
Lafayette CA 94549
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-40-2-14
PROPERTY OWNER: Valley Christian Center of Dublin, Inc .
7400 San Ramon Rd.
Dublin CA 94568
EXISTING ZONING : San Ramon Road Specific Plan - Retail
Commercial (Shopper Goods )
The Zoning Ordinance is superceded by San Ramon
Road Specific Plan
EXISTING LAND USE: Church (vacant)
Day Care Center (permit expires 3/87 )
Vacant .
SURROUNDING ZONING LAND USE_
North - Retail Commercial Residential
East San Ramon Rd. *. . Roadway-
South - Retail Commercial ' Commercial
West - Multi-family .Residential Vacant
and Office Uses
SITE/ZONING HISTORY: . DC-3 permits the operation of a private
school, in conjunction with a church, for 110 students . This
permit continued the approval of the school, which was previously
permitted by C-3643 , until March, 1987 .
In June, 1983 , the City Council approved the San Ramon Road
Specific Plan, which shows the subject property within an area
designated for Retail Commercial use, with a permitted use being
"shopper goods" such as family apparel and household furnishings ,
and eating and drinking establishments .
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS :
Refer to the San Ramon Road Specific Plan:
Pages 6-7 : Indicates the permitted, conditional, and
prohibited uses that apply to the subject property . These
allow retail . shopper oriented uses , and eating and drinking
establishments . Conditional Use Permits are required for
community, religious , charitable, and public facilities and
use . It prohibits convenience retail uses such as grocery
stores and drive-ins , as well as residential office and
industrial uses .
Page 9 : Requires the use of 1 ) the extension of Amador
Valley Boulevard to provide access to parcels fronting along
San Ramon Road; and 2 ) a limited number of direct access.
points from properties adjacent to San Ramon Road-
-,10 #2-Compatibility of uses :' States that "Special
attention shall be placed on insuring compatibility of uses
proposed in any new development with existing. or . other
commercial development now located within or adjacent to the
Specific Plan Area. "
Page 10 , 43-Circulation Improvements : Requires that vehicular
ingress , egress and internal circulation be provided -
according to the provisions of the circulation element of
the Specific Plan .
Page 10 , #l-Zoning: Requires that new development proposals
go through a Planned Development Rezoning process . Because
this application involves the use of an existing structure,
the application process started prior to adoption of the
Specific Plan, and _it ' s purpose is to establish a use on a
limited time basis , Staff has determined that it is , in this
case, acceptable to process this application for a
Conditional Use Permit, consistent with the previous Zoning
Ordinance procedures .
Zoning Ordinance, Section 8-94 . 0 states that conditional uses
must be analyzed to determine : 1 ) whether or not the use is
required by the public need; 2 ), whether or not the use will be
properly related to other land uses , transportation and service
facilities in the vicinity; 3 ) whether or not the use will
materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or
working in the vicinity; and 4 ) whether or not the use will be
contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards
established for the district in which it is located.
Section 8-94 . 4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit
may be valid only for a specified term, and may be made
contingent upon the acceptance and observance of specified
conditions , including but not limited to the following matters :
a) substantial conformity to approved plans and drawings ;
b) limitations on time of day for the conduct of specified
activities ;
c ) time period within which the approval shall be exercised and
the proposed use brought into existence, failing which, the
approval shall lapse and be void;
d) guarantees as to compliance with the terms of the approval,
including the posting of bond;
e ) compliance with requirements of other departments of the
City/County Government .
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Negative Declaration was prepared on
August 3 , 1983 . A copy of the Negative Declaration is
attached to this report .
NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the' September 26, ' 1983 , hearing
was published in the Tri-Valley Herald, mailed to adjacent
property owners, and posted in public buildings _
ANALYSIS :
General Site Conditions : --
This is a Conditional Use Permit application to establish
and operate a mortuary on a 1 . 49 acre site, located on the west
side of San Ramon Rd. , just north of Amador Valley Blvd. . The
proposed mortuary building was formerly used as a church. . . The
remainder. of_the site contains a daycare, center, that can have up
-to, 110,:children,; and vacant -.land The property to the south
contains a paint store, and a dog-`.grooming shop.` The property to
the north is _in residential use
' The proposed mortuary is -expected to serve 100 families and
conduct 60 . on-site .funeral services during.: the . first year of its
.operation. Funeral processions will proceed-'south, on .San Ramon
Rd- , ' to Highways 580/680 . The processions will then use the
Highway system to proceed to the selected cemetary.
The application indicates that the daycare center will,
likely, be vacated by December. Their conditional use permit,
however, -is good until March, 1987.
The site is slightly sloping, with its northwest corner
adjacent to Martin Canyon Creek. Access to the site is from a .
28-foot access easement that lies between the subject site and
the property to the south . Parking currently takes place on a
poorly maintained asphalt pad. Access to the site is now limited
to right turn in, and right turn out, from San Ramon Road.
People do turn left into the site, however, and to do so they
illegally cross . a painted median . Legal access for northbound
San Ramon Rd. traffic requires that these cars make a: U-turn at
Silvergate .
There are several issues/concerns that should be considered
in determining if the mortuary should be granted a Conditional
: Use ..Permit . . These include :
a. relationship of use to adopted City plans ; _.
b::.:. appropriateness of the use; . .
C .. traffic circulation, -.access, and.;parking; .
d. site plan .and site conditions ;._
e . other .
Each of the above issues/concerns will be briefly discussed
below.
a. Relationship of the proposed use to adopted City Plans .
The San Ramon Road Specific Plan clearly states that
the subject site should be developed for retail commercial
use with the emphasis being on providing for the sale of
shopper goods , such as clothing stores and furniture stores
that "offer comparison goods based on price and quality" .
A mortuary is not considered as providing retail
shopper goods services . It is a personal service use which
is prohibited on the subject site according to the Specific
Plan . '
b . Appropriateness of the use on the subject site_
A mortuary use is not thought of as being conducive to
encouraging retail uses to locate in proximity to it_ Since
the subject site is large enough to have new buildings built
on it, and the property to the north can have additional-
development . on it, it is important that any use permitted in
this area be looked at as to whether or not it will
encourage new development supporting the -City ' s plan for the
area. The proposed use is not considered as supporting the
City ' s plans .
C . Traffic circulation, access and parking .
The subject site has limited and restricted access,
since only right turns into and out of the property are
permitted. The adopted San Ramon Road alignment -and design
will require that a raised median be installed down .San
Ramon .Road, . east of the site :.This. will. require northbound
traffic .to proceed to _Silvergate Drive, and make . a U-turn at
that point :';. Alternatively, :access could be gained through ..
the properties at Amador Valley Blvd and San Ramon Road,
and then proceeding across those properties to the site. A
Right-of-Access agreement from these properties would be
required. The existing parking aisle layout for these
properties is not now
conducive to cross-property traffic .
The mortuary will have funeral processions that will
require on-site parking for 40 to 60 cars . There are
several problems associated with parking and moving the
procession on and off the site . The current parking area
will have to be enlarged to hold the likely number of cars
that may form a procession . The applicant proposes to add a
temporary gravel parking lot . With large processions , the
traffic and parking will impact adjacent property.
Additionally, when a procession exits the site, it will
enter San Ramon Rd_ , which is and will be one of the most
heavily travelled streets in the City. Traffic problems are
expected as the processions attempt to enter and travel down
San Ramon Road. Clearly, access , circulation, and parking
will create problems for this . site and adjacent property.
d: Site plan and site. conditions
The e xisting site is not designed to accommodate the
,.anticipated parking .demands of '-the, mortuary iise or any -
' additional development-'.of -the site . _.to.-.40
additional parking.. stalls .are :needed for "the.-.mortuary _alone
Several other -stalls are needed f.or. :the.;daycare center, and
for.,any.,additional uses .that,- could be added to .the site i.n-::
the future : These additional . parking areas .:should-,be .",_
designed to permit' effective on .°arid off-site circulation,.`
permit north/south .access .across , t he pr-operty, . as required . .
by .the San 'Ramon Road Specific- Plan; and recognize that-
retail uses are going to surround this property, with joint
use parking and access being sought_
SUMMARY=
The proposed use does not conform with the use limitations
of the San Ramon Road Specific Plan _ The mortuary is not
considered to be conducive to encouraging the development of
retail uses in proximity to the mortuary site . There are
significant traffic circulation and access problems which
will occur approximately one day a week . The site, should
the mortuary be permitted to be established, will need to
have considerable site work done to create parking and -
circulation pathways that are adequate for the use, relate
to present and future retail development in the area.
This use, while it is a relatively nuisance-free use, is not
compatible or conducive to the future development of retail ,
shopper-goods use in the proposed location. The use might
not be consistent with the San Ramon Road Specific Plan .
Traffic circulation and access problems further speak
against approval of the mortuary use .
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED - The City Council should hold
the pubic hearing on this request, make a decision on the
application, and then make findings to support the City
Council ' s action. If the City Council approves, or _
disapproves , the Conditional Use Permit, a resolution should _
be passed to support that decision ( see the two attached
draft resolutions : one which includes the required findings
for approval, ' and. the other for denial) _ Per Section. 5 of
Ordinance No. 11 , if there is no majority vote by the City
Council, .the Planning Commission action approving -the
` pro jects will- remain in effect - (for example, if there is a
;' ., •.
2-2 vote :of `the City Council) .
PRE-HEARING RECOMMENDATION
. It is recommended that the Oakmont Memorial Mortuary
Conditional Use Permit be denied, and that the City Council
find that it is not consistent with the San Ramon Road
Specific Plan, and that the findings required to approve .a
Conditional Use Permit cannot be made .
Should the City Council choose to approve the Permit, Staff
recommends that the approval be conditioned to assure that
the development and improvement of the subject site be done
consistent with City requirements for retail uses and be
done to relate well to adjacent property, as is required by
the San Ramon Road Specific Plan . A resolution with such
conditions is attached.
Attachments : 1 _ Site Plan
2 _ Draft Resolution adopting Negative
Declaration
3 . Draft Resolution denying. Conditional
:.Use . Permit.. ;.-
4 -Draft Resolution. approving
-Conditional , Use Permit
5 _ Memorandum from; City Engineer--dtd
8/19/8.3
6 = Letter . from DSRSD dtd.,.7/18/83..'
7 . Letter from Fire .`Department dtd -
7/1.9/83 _.;
8 - .:',Negative Declaration
9 . . .. Area Site Plan
10 . Description of .Project
11 _ Memo from Frank R. . Haswell
12 . Aerial photo of mortuary site
13 . Photos of site
( 4PN ,V/• 40
4-1;?9/
C m cr ari � o''iYkX �.Y-GfYrACL�i(AY Y�'1�) {� � I •`t'{• �.I I �4+1� i
Ah .1 W� 'I � / �.�j`F+Z•- _ :41'�.. ---_f -L-y���-:^�.;� ' �-�--,"Fs-•:c-�'^'_'"-.V-+-%,�-r I t , •c .�• �p� i.
J I ( 7 b/Yi vG al e4P1 LYE?J
�I .. —.—.,—I •''•' ;•l' •.I '.r.�:.E-�::'N:..,,M M ti �� �' ,~..p.
j�' �I- I' I I i � �•� �=� �� .'� ::I:• :::� t• � � fy;, (Va��I: t'�(; I
.11 ''I I I I IO D {H+'PY4P �fL.r/Uf Jy �.' J' Y• •'�•/'.1 .. I
III
. -j aiVee�Kr.wre COG✓ a/ �tit, �� - ,d � T � � �r 1
dY•(bu•bC.'ras 'E.osE sVT,fit .v79 Q�'E - -—— — 1
��-.Za10 GUT,YiT.ES ld.fiiGL.{SCl,4YYfL f. - 'r t,1 y ,{4 'r .� ✓ jv iA" : �' n t[` -1• • ,�± I y �l._i r•( �y r
.f f+�Id. Ij4m:i�f _ Ktiyti• �Fx.-,� �w.T 1:jy..e _1� 3 i lY`t
�— �. �ti t ' �� ��.�!�Y. `,' �-, fi\ a� a�+.,y') +L �7 ,�+k'� ,1 �_�. V'^.1• p -?;Z�?� �'�y"'";�✓ f I'y7°-_„ L
- ! l 7n.,�..it-�i"1 lfl FY~: .7.ti r+1�T 1�,.�`fy.�y. �'t � .1._ ..if.]N'. f C..�_,- -•y� �..J ; •1��� -�. 11 7•� .
� c �..�•r,:R;'s' til: 'tw:'L<<4,TF' , 1 } �,�. s -k .�'. a, i I r
_ l �J�1tc�. ;:1 •i�tt �'�r� f „�jT... 'i. •��`v by s -f;4C f.. l t�,fE''c�5�. Y y�i��� I t
.. QP.N. .9Q/•4v-?•7 t' _ 'r'r: r:J.'•,»q•_.f.. 6Ei :P ; � •,' 1
1 AA �4 / YLP ` :RT>, JI4 -w ✓.1 r }L: 'jI I
•1 "; �` f ,_ `8hr '7 r r L +, I •�' "7.r � 'f •�r .:.�L��?'� 5�., y��V.• ��. Y 1
' ... ..",1 FIN .A7/�'t�,t9 .:r-'------, ,...... ti `'. �..�......�J.s._ —� i_.--- .17�1�i-.•� 1 � ',tiy' 4
- f}'�7T/n!; ..SGrGt°P,�K DLL4 � •�. ... �.- �_ ���_. � I ,�ll � .-
. Fry,<,4,r s�vtCS•R�bc✓S,weeEQULST.2�c�-o,a,e�uiebr � � 7 I I � {
f
:?YJ.�arE�YirO.�-G.1.r.^yftLYO�l7�f�On 6vT .
i
..=•:.-I.GL-f'L°.srL!L-- Of
/.u'04✓azPE LcsE�v CL�Em4°.P�9US, � j
i
AZ A°D.wUSE.OW IWI-JI 1YE-rIEN/3 S.v000 BE .. I .`=. 7 1.1
.�CCST'fYiCYEO.OJ J.u1W--C1 aPCJ.PfY,l/if>`-O e tk .6 ' - --�_- --• _• 7'!.1"x-'7— Q�,.�, i
rc7 �o/ ea tcwN i - - r.: HL 7. tlno .:; IIiG
oaalcinES�E,r�sroL�. • ---: .uc�rtPr -_• ...... _ .
7':-
- • RECEIVE D
S/TE PLAN
J? -
x"x.rrEacv: �s�rie�c�r i�a�rsn�t���st �
SAP, 1983
a s�/E�2.ECa�-7+�'NT,F�r,YJV irw irrcc c���arEO �. . . .. /G'LLfY G�,G.P/ST/D/V LNl�i4
-�'V V2 oavi.WSTPV/ire.PErrEiY rn2srl ` .y,^� C/lY ar GY/0z//V i
�� ✓rrc OF, f/E 2c+2 DUBLIN PLANNING DIDiYlEDD G4U�Yly
• v 77;H�DC SEfTiLiU
SCHELL AND MARTIN, INC.
uxn SUZY"O AM M INGl nw {
'1••• 0077 YT,OULLO 111ILM11)
o
LA/t7RT
/o �s sa V6
L GU/ORM IA RNOM7 74!111
4'1G7,7)'4A1ckCl10C�fe< C
2E. L n r - lo.•a<o-4S
THE CITY OF DUBLIN
Y.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94566 . (415) 829-3543
MEMORANDUM
September 7 , 1983 -
TO City -Clerk/City .Manager
, FROM: ` Councilmember ."Jeffer "
y
SUBJECT : . PA :83-029 Oakmont Memorial park
On September 6 , 1983 , the Planning Commission reviewed Planning
Application PA 83-029 Oakmont Memorial Park, ;a Conditional Use
Permit to .allow a mortuary in an area designated for Retail
Commercial/Shopper Goods use, at 7400 San Ramon Rd.. . The Planning
Commission approved the application subject to conditions .
I appeal the Planning Commission ' s action on the application so
that the City Council will have an opportunity to review the
application and make a determination .
t -
Couci member, Linda.�J&,ffe�r_y
cc : Planning Director
i
RECEIVED
:SEP ° i983
CITY Cc D?_!3L'N1
RESOLUTION NO. 83-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF .'DUBLIN
-------------------------------------------------------------
APPROVING PA 83-029 OAKMONT MEMORIAL PARK CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A MORTUARY IN AN AREA DESIGNATED FOR
RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES
WHEREAS, Oakmont Memorial Park has filed an application
for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a mortuary
in an area designated for Retail Commercial uses located at 7400
San Ramon Rd. , Dublin, California (APN 941-40-2-14 ) ; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing on said application on August 6, ' 1983 ; and,
WHEREAS, the proper :notice -or.'said public hearing was
,given in all respects.. as required by -law; .and,
WHEREAS; `the application. ha's -been *reviewed in accordance
with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act '
and a Negative , Declaration was prepared; and, .
WHEREAS, a Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis was submitted
recommending the application be conditionally approved; and,
WHEREAS; the Planning Commission did hear and consider
all said reports, recommendations , and testimony as herinabove set
forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Dublin Planning
Commission does hereby find that :
a . The use is required to serve a public need.
b . The use will be properly related to other land uses and
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity;
c . The use, if permitted, under the circumstances and conditions
of this particular case, will not materially affect adversely
the health or safety of persons residing or working the
vicinity, or be materially deterimental to. the public welfare
".` or injurious to property or improvements in -the neighborhood,. .
as .all applicable regulations will be met .':.'
' d. The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses _
or performance standards established for the area in which it
is . to be located. _
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does
hereby conditionally approve said application as shown by
materials labelled "Exhibit A" , on file with the Dublin Planning
Department, subject to the following conditions :
1 . A revised site plan and landscape plan shall be submitted to,
and be approved by, the Dublin Planning Department prior to
issuance of any building permit that shows :
a . parking for 20 cars within parking lots. that are
designed to City zoning and engineering standards ;
b . parking lots containing landscaping and lighting (e-g-
15-gallon trees :' one per each four parking stalls ; )
C . a north/south vehicular travel aisle , providing a
connection between the subject site and the properties
to the north and south ;
d. provision of pedestrian walkways , connecting parking
areas to the mortuary;
e . a substantial trash enclosure .
2 . Construction of San Ramon Road street improvements, as
recommended by the City Engineer, which are :
a . street improvements shall be installed along the San
Ramon Rd. frontage , based on the newly adopted street
plan for San Ramon Rd- , for the area west of the
existing paved street; or a performance bond, or letter _
of intent shall be poSted;
b . the site plan be cor.,patible with the proposed extension
of Amador Valley Blvc_ , to the south of the subject
property, as far as allowing for a circulation
connection . to the extension of Amador Valley Blvd. ;
: c . the existing :access _(prior :to the adjacent property to
'the -south providing-access ) shall be right turn . in, and
right turn:.out;
d..:: the parking areas shall be :paved and shall be properly
graded and drained_
e . only one driveway s;-?all serve this, and the property to
the south.
3 : ,. Compliance with DSRSD cone=lions (see attached letter) .
a . Compliance with DSRSD Fire Department requirements regarding
installation of a fire Yhyd-ant cn-site (see attached letter)
5 _ All changes to the buildin , landscaping, signing, lighting,
and site plan shall be approved by the Dublin Planning
Department prior to issuace of the related permits ..
6 . This permit shall termir_ate five years from the effective
date of this resolution (on September 16, 1988 ) . During the
effective time period, t-? 7permit shall be subject to
revocation for cause in accordance with Section 8-90 . 3 of the
Dublin . Zoning Ordinance -
7 - . All improvements to the site shall be .undertaken with the
'intent ,.of making the proper=y' compatible to future retail :
development. on adjacent p=czerties and on the vacant portions
of. .this property_
PASSED;' APPROVED 'AD ADOPTED this 6th .day of September,
N
1983 ; .
AYES : .4
NOES : 1
ABSENT. 0 �
"Planning Commission Chairman �(
ATTr.ST:
Planning Directo
all , • n this building . Mr . Coupe asked whether that gilding
would required to be sprinkled (referring to the Fire
DepartmenC etter dated August 26, 1983 ) , and Mr-"'Tong indicated
that the app l ' ant would need to get togeth �with the Fire Chief = _
in order to clar • v that requirement . =
on motion of Cm. Alexan r, second by Cm_ Petty, and by
unanimous vote of the Comm l io rs ; the following Resolution was
approved .(with the correctio reference .to Highway I-580 , ' .
.:-rather .than '•I-680 ) = .
RESOLUTION NO- : 83-
APPROVING 83-041, - SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING RORATION, A
- CONDITION USE PERMIT APPLICATION TO ALLOW THE. STO E OF MOBILE
OFFICFd AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTATIVE OFFICES T AN M-1
/ (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT ,
PA 83-029 OAKMONT MEMORIAL PARK
CONDITIONAL USE PE.RMI^1
Mr . Tong explained the application, distributing new site plans ,
and noting the proposed uses for the San Ramon Road area, as
established by the San Ramon Road Specific Plan . He also noted
traffic patterns wi-iich were of considerable concern, and
recommended denial of the application .
Mr . Frank Haswell, Executive Vice President of the Oakmont
Memorial Park, provided background for the project .
Dr. Ward Tanneberg, Pastor of the Valley Chris Church, owner
of the property in question, pointed out that the EIR, prepared
for the :Negative Declaration for the project-, indicated no
significant impact 'v:ith mitigation Of traffic . He also indicated
.that there is a frontage road from -Amador _Valley Blvd. , ' across.
San Ramon Road, which has served patrons of the commercial
: properties , as well as the Valley Christian - Center . ..
Additionally, he requested that the application be extended, from ..
two. year ' s duration to five years .
Mr Tong clarified Staff ' s position, responding that a mortuary
is not a religious activity, but .ra..her a personal service, and, . _.
typically, is not considered conducive to retail/commercial
shopper goods uses, as designated in the San Ramon Road Specific
Plan . Additionally, the traffic and parking characteristics are
considerably different from religious activities carried on in a.
church .
PC- µ(NuTEs
• S�- h � S�S3
Elizabeth Schmitt, 8358 Cypress Court, interjected that, although
she does not, personally, believe in funerals , she hoped that the
Commission would consider those Dublin residents who do rely on _
this type of service , and she encouraged approval of the _=
Conditional Use Permit .
Cm. Alexander asked Pastor Tanneberg if the .church had an
easement across the property where the "frontage road" appeared
to be located_ Pastor Tanneberg responded that, to -his .
knowledge,`- thearea has been -,public access , -across the front of
those properties for .several years
•
Mr - -Tong indicated .that, according :to .records 'in. the. Planning
Department, .. the area ,in front of the 'Nichandros"property" was
: not actually .acquired by the County,'-.,and that. access to the
' properties no1rth 'oz . the proposed. extension" of .Amador Valley Blvd.
has been gained through private property access agreements . . .The
easement in question was never consummated by Mr- Nichandros for
the County .
Cm. Alexander then asked what would. occur should Mr. Nichandros
decide to erect a fence sometime in the future . He suggested, in
light of the lack of easements , that the property owners enter
into an agreement for joint access . He added that he did not
reel comfortable deciding on this matter until after an agreement
of legal access is reached between the property owners .
Cm. Petty spoke in defense of Staff ' s concern over conformance
with Retail Uses , as defined in the San Ramon Road Specific Plan.
On motion of Cm. Alexander, and second by Cm. .Vonheeder, the
Commission unanimously adopted the following Resolution : .
RESOLUTION 83-012
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONCERNING
PA 83-029 OAKMONT MEMORIAL PARK
With regard to the Conditions of 'Approval- sL-ipulated.,for the
Conditional Use Permit, ' Pastor.. Tanneberg -specifically.:,disagreed .
with
Item la - indicated a need for only 20 parking spaces ;
lb - the requirement called for too many trees ;
le - requested clarification of "substantial trash
enclosure" ;
2a - felt street improvements too extensive prior to
San Ramon Road improvement;
4 - requested clarification of requirement for fire
hydrants for buildings already in existance;
6 - requested extension to 5 years .
The 'Commissioners agreed that Conditions of Approval should be
revised as follows :
Item la 20 parking stalls required;
2a add: "A performance.bond :or 'letter 'of .intent
.
May be submitted for approval by the City
Engineer
6 : extend the approval period is 5 years, until
September 16; .
Cm. Mack made the motion, with Cm_ Vonheeder ' s second, to adopt
the ,Resolution Approving PA 83-039 , subject to revised Conditions
of Approval . The . motion passed 4-1, with Cm_ Petty, opposed:
RESOLUTION 83-013 .
APPROVING PA 83-029 OAKMONT MEMORIAL PARK CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A MORTUARY IN AN AREA DESIGNATED
FOR RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES
SIN GR L
REZ LING
Mr . g introduced item, _ which is an application for Tanned
Develop nt rezoning to allow a 269-unit apartment pplex on a
13 . 4 acre ite .( 20 dwelling units per acre . ) He oted . several _.
technical re sions to the General Provisions zovided in the
draft Resoluti n. labelled "Exhibit D" , ,as f lows :
Item 2 : shou read " _ _ 50 u is
10 : the prop ty ow (not developer) should provide
status repo
11 : should ad " wall or heavy timbered fence .
17b : e property owner (not veloper) shall maintain
facilities ;
21 and 24 : add: "This condition will subject to
modification by the City Engineer, as ecessary _ "
27 . add: "The possibility for a common water me
may be discussed with DSRSD. "
old in heritage - new in ideas
bf
,
1 t
R, ECEIYEp
Ch b� of Commerce September 22, .1983 SEP 2 2 198
CITY OF DUBLJJ�j
Dublin City Council ?
City of.DubIin
6500 Dublin Boulevard, Suite 100
Dublin., California 94568
Dear.Mayor Snyder & Council Members:
This is to inform you that the Dublin Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors
fully support the Valley Christian Center at 7400 San Ramon Road becoming
a funeral home.
While we recognize your desire to have "shopper goods" stores in the area,
the building does exist and the funeral home will improve the area by better
landscaping and the removal of the portable classrooms in the rear of the
property. It is our understanding the portables will be removed by July-
August, 1984.
Your approval of the Planning Commission's decision is respectfully
requested.:
Fp//rely
� .
A L WHITE, First Vice' President
Board of Directors
AW: `nf
6500-E Dublin Boulevard Dublin, California 94566 (415) 828-6200
RESOLUTION N0:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
--- ---------------------------------------------------------
DENYING 'THE APPEAL AND APPROVING PA 83-029 OAKMONT MEMORIAL
PARK CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A
, MORTUARY .IN AN AREA DESIGNATED FOR.: RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES
WHEREAS, Oakmont Memorial .•Park has filed. an application.
:. for `a Conditional Use Permit .to .allow the operation of . a mortuary
in an area designated for Retail Commercial uses located at .7400
San Ramon Rd. , Dublin, California • (•APN . 941-40-2-14 ) ; and, ._..
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing and approve said application on September 6 , 1983 ; and,
WHEREAS, a Councilmember filed an 'appeal of the Planning
Commission decision; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing on
said application on September 26, 1983 ; and
WHEREAS, the proper notice of said public hearing was
given in all respects as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance
with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
and a Negative Declaration was prepared; and,
WHEREAS, a Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis was submitted
recommending the application be denied; and, .-
WHEREAS, the City Council . did hear .and consider all said
.reports, . recommendations, ,, and testimony as hereinabove set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the, Dublin City
Council does hereby find .that : .,.
a_ The use is required to - serve- a public need_ "_
b . The use will be properly related to other land uses and
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity;
c . The use , if permitted, under the circumstances and conditions
of this particular case, will not materially affect adversely
the health or safety of persons residing or working the
vicinity, or be materially deterimental to the public welfare
or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood,
as all applicable regulations will be meta
d_ The use is considered a retail commercial shopper goods will
not be contrary to .the specific intent clauses or performance .
standards established for the area in which it is to be _
located, as prescribed by the San Ramon Road Specific Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
conditionally approve said application as shown by materials
labelled "Exhibit A" , on file with the Dublin Planning Department,
subject to the following conditions : .
1 A 'Sit Development Review,' including a revised site plan . and
landscape plan shall be submitted to, ' .and be approved by, the
Dublin .Planning' Department. prior to issuance of. any building
permit '.that shows :
a. parking for - 50 cars within parking . lots `that are
designed to City zoning and engineering standards ;
b . parking lots containing landscaping and lighting (e -g-
15-gallon trees : one per each four parking stalls ; )
C . a north/south vehicular travel aisle, providing a
connection between the subject site and the properties
to the north and south;
d. provision of pedestrian walkways, connecting parking
areas to the mortuary;
e . a substantial trash enclosure.
2 . Construction of San Ramon Road street improvements, as
recommended by the City Engineer, which are :
a. street improvements shall be installed along the San
Ramon Rd. . frontage, based .on the newly adopted street
plan for . San Ramon Rd. , . for the area west of ..the
existing paved street, or a performance -bond or letter
of credit shall be posted; .
b . the site plan be compatible 'with..the proposed extension
of Amador.. ValleyBlvd. , to the south of. the subject
. .'property, as far as 'allowing fora :circulation
connection to the extension of Amador•Valley Blvd.
C . the existing access (prior to the adjacent property to
the south providing access ) shall be right turn in, and
right turn out;
d. . the parking areas shall be paved and shall be properly
graded and drained.
e . only one driveway shall serve this , and the property to
the south.
3 . Compliance with DSRSD conditions ( see attached letter) .
4 . Compliance with DSRSD Fire Department requirements regarding
installation of a fire hydrant on-site (see attached letter) .
5 . All changes to the building, landscaping, signing, lighting,
and site plan shall be approved by the Dublin Planning
Department prior to issuance of the related permits . ., .
6 . This permit shall;. terminate on .two" years from the effective
date of _this . resolution (on September 26; -1985) . .:, During the
. effective-,time -period, -, the permit°'.shall be subject to
revocation for--cause in accordance -with Section' 8-90 .3 of the
Dublin Zoning .Ordinance .
7 . All improvements to the site shall -be undertaken with the
intent of making the property compatible to future retail
development on adjacent properties and on the vacant portions
of this property. .
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of
1983
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:. .
City Clerk
CITY OF DUBLIN
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin. CA 94568 (415) 529-4600
M E M O R A N D U M
August 19 , 1983
TO Planning Director
FROM: City * Engineer
RE:- Vallev, Christian Center/Mortuary
If approved, we recommend the following conditions :
1 . Street improvements be . installed along the San Ramon Rd.
frontage based on the newly adopted schematic street plan
for San Ramon Road for that area west of the existing paved
street ,-
2 . The site plan be compatible with the proposed extension of
Amador Valley Blvd. , to the south of the subject property,
as far as allowing for connection -o the extension
circulation of Amador Valley Blvd;
3 . Provision be .made for circulation elements through this site
for the property to the north to be able to access the
extension of Amador Valley Blvd;
4 : ' The��exist�ing - access (prior to the adjacent property; .to the _
south, providing access ) .;shall be right .turn in,- and right,
turn out; .
5 All parking areas shall be properly graded:'and drained;
6 ., There may be some parking conflicts while the daycare
building is ..being used, and if some other. use is made' of the
daycare buildings ;
7 . Only one driveway shall serve this , and the property -to the
south .
-10-
J �'�:� wr)r-a A �R I". 'rN u `�✓ H v �aa k.� R: V �?,,.i'�v S �..�' S � :7 ,a 0
I vr�
General Offices: 7051 Dublin Boulevard Dublin, California 94568 (415) 828-0515
July 18 , 1983
Mr. Larry Tong
W. Dublin 'Planning .Director
City of Dublin
P 0_ Box 2340
Dublin,' CA ' :94568
File No. PA 83-029 "Oakmont Memorial Chapel: :
Conditional Use- Permit .
Dear Mr.' Tong:
Thank you . Lor the opportunity to review the Oakmont Memorial Park
Proposed Mortuary.'
The Dublin San Ramon Services District Public Works Department has
reviewed the site plan and has the -following comments:
1 . The water connection will require a reduced
pressure back flow prevention device on the
water supply .
2 _ This facility may fall under the Industrial
Waste Code oL the District and may require
an inspection manhole. Without. improvement -
plans , final . inspection of sewer needs and.
fees is - not possible. :
3 . Future fees that may be required can only
be °determined by.. improvement plans . ==
4 . The . history of :this .site has .been' that the
- access road has been ;poorly. maintained;
thus , exposing District facilities (such,,.as
manholes) . to traffic damage:-`
Be assured that we' will work wi th.you-and the .developer *in -every- way
possible to make this a successful project: '
Very .truly .yours,
CE ED
7-_24,L2-/JUL 19 1983
Miles A. Ferris
Director of Public:��n)tsi�1G
MAF: cp
CC : Chief Phillips
Emil Kattan
Jt.iRC;..:i!:i:Oi:hS,;••,CF ff!E''.;TA 7"c':�F!:AL:=Oarlic --...`HOES reVNIC:P- ".re_SERVICES iO CITIZE^ISOFAMADCR-U-w r--=-h:=Ea ..'' ' :•I'.`-E .;
DUBLIN SAN RA ON SERVICES DISTRICT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
HEADQUARTERS STATION
9399 Fircrest Lane 7051 Dublin Boulevard Teleonone:
San Ramon, California Dublin, California 94566 829-2333
July 19, 1983
Mr.- Laurence L.' Tong
Planning Director
City of Dublin
P. 0. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94S63
Dear Mr. Tong
In reference to Fire_No. PA 83-029) Oakmont Memorial
Chapel Conditional Use Permit,_the Dublin San Ramon
Services District Fire Department has reviewed the
site plan and has the following comment :
The Day Care Center buildings must beremoved before
final approval by the Fire Department. If these
buildings are not removed,- an on-site fire hydrant
will be required. .
V e7y ruly yours,
.
Jam
es M. Morton.
Captain
Fire .Prevention
JNN:cb . P. ECEIV. ED
cc: E. Kattan JUL 21 1983 .
DUBLIN PLAN;KING
CI'X'Y OF DUBLIN
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568 (415) 829-4600
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR: PA83-029 Oakmont Memorial Park
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code 'Section 21000, et seq: )
LOCATION A_NLD West side , of San Ramon .Rd just north of Amador. .Valley Blvd_
The proposed use would :occupy .-he existing church building
PROPONENT:
Oakmont` Memorial Parke,- ' Frank Haswell
DESCRIPTION: This is a proposal to convert an existing church into a .
mortuary _ 100 families a. year will be served_
FINDINGS : The project will no t have a 51gn1_T1Cant e.-cCt on ' he
env iron-ment_
INITIAL STUDY: The Initial Studv .is attach°_d with a brief. discussion
of ,the folio�eis-ig_ .environmental components:
:. Seismic , traffic
f
ITIGaTION M_E.ASURES
Seismic-New construction snail .comply � 2-'C h 'Alameda-,.County Building
Department requirements
Traffic-Off-site traffic circulation will be limited .to restrict north
bound traffic on .San Ramon Rd. & adequate on-site parking will be
PREPARATION : This Negative Declaration was prepared by the City required_
of Dublin Planning Staff , (415) 829-4916
SIGNATURE :
1 DATE:
Laurence L. Tong, Plann Director
DP 83-11
CITY OF DU51_lt� �; PA No
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.) _
Based on the project information submitted in Section 1 General Data, the Planning Staff
w'I l use 'Section 3, Initial Study, to determine whether c Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report is required.
SECTION 3. 1NITIAL` STUDY:- - .to be completed by the' ,PLANNING .STAFF.
Name of Project or A r pl icant_
-A.. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING - Description of projecs site before the.'projecfi, including
information-on: topography; soil sfic6ility; plants and animals; �istor, a(, cultural, a
scenic aspects;. existing structures; and use of structures t'{?j -� �R
- r
A,6
Description of surrounding properties, including information ion en: plants a,td enimols;
historical, .cultural, and scenic cspects; type and Inienslry of land use;`aa ale Or
development_ ` ? 1€�9�-t f x� �Z� t.^i -P 3A i� 7t
6, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Factucl explanations of all answers except ".no".cre re
-
B.
red 0., G, sheets
T_ Ii" F ET-P C1' "
NO (EJ1�'L ES - L G�
rte :
z
_ 1 � t
_ OIo1010
1.0 WATER 1 } t
1.1 Hydrologic 8olanco Will comtrucrion of the project altar the hydro— I I I
logic bolonce? 1 t
1.2 Ground Woter Will the project affect the quality or quenr4y of
V I
ground vote, supplies?
1.T Dcprh to Water Tebla Will the rare of water vrithdra�-al chonge the depth
or gradient of th_ vntcr table? { { {
1.4 Drainage and channel form Will construction impel^ the natural drainage pattern I {or cause niter t;on of strcam channel Form?
1-S Sedimentation Will construction in an area result in major sediment { {
fnflu> into adjacent carer bodies? {
1.S Flooding Will there be risk of loss of life or property due { { {
to 11001iina?
A-5
Ca 1 RENT
�Il'ACTS SCALE OF INTACT
No QJALIFIID YES M\GI 3-,`N
I\;0
l.7 Y later Gwl ry Doc,drinking --at" supply foil to-cat state and
- federal standards? - -
Will - -age 6. incle-Ivatcly aceommcdotCd and I
treated? -
.'. Will receiving waters foil to a:cr.t local, stc'c pad '• "
fcderol sto,sdords? .
( ( I
1
Will ground water suffer co ntom,natioo by vnfa_e
seepa?1, intrusion of salt or polluted v.atcr (rr-.m
adjacent water bodies or from another,:onti-inrsted
2.0 AM ] ( I
2,1 A r Pollution Will there be ganeration and dispeniar-of p-)llutants" /
by projeC related activities or in pro.:r.sir tr-t.':e ✓ ] ( _ 1
.. .. project which mill ercecd mete n:re.:i-na c•r
. .. gvolity stordards? .s .
2.2 Wind Al,tcrotion Will ,trvcturc and terra in'impedc p:c tilirc.,ink I - ( ]
flow causing channeling along certair.eorri:sz 7r
obstruction of wind movementz?
3}.0 EARTH
3.1 Slaps Stability Are there potential dang-, rclo tad to c:app failures? - --
3.2 Foundation Supaor; Wiil there 6e risk to life or propen:v'r_-au.e of
excessive defamation of
3.3 Can olida.'ion Vllll :here be risk to Iifc or proocr/!'ccc cf s/ I
ucessi•re consolidation of foundati-sn r..n to-iois?
t
3.4 Subsidence Is tharc:isk of major crounc r�6sid�:n,-.r.anacoarcd t t t
t=c project? ( ( ] { f
3.5 Seismic Activity Is there risk of damasc or loss resnitina f:na acr:h- t t t If f
c�•o�-e ac:i•r ity? I ( i I -
3.5 liquefaction Ylill :Sa project ec•na or be exposed Nn IiGv=:ectSon 1
of soils in slcoes or unCrr founda!i:ns?
3.7 Erodioility - Will :hcrc be s-.:bstcntial loss of snit r`.-:,
s:ruc:ions proc!ices?
3.8 Pe meability Will the permeability of saiis auociat-r!
. - project prnent adver-a conditions relat2ve
" velooment of wells?
3.9 Unigvv Features Will eny ursigoe geologiccl.(eetu:es br_da mo]ed ]
destroyed by project octw,hcs?
3.10 Mineral Resources - Are there geologic depot-ts of potential r; ercinl
value close to the prniccr? t -
4.0 PLANTS AND ANIMALS r :
4.1 Plant and Animal Species
Are there rare or endanecrcd species p-rcnt�
Arc tEscrc species pre._nt which arc pa-t:cola ly
• .; ' " susccptiolc to impact from human octivityo s i - -
Is there vc_tJOrionprasont,. the !ate.of
deny fo d or habitat to important wild:i.re spcc.•'s?-.
Arc there nuisance species of plar..or onim�:s for
• which conditions will i,e improved by kFe project? -
Are there on unusual populations of pinnrs ISO!may
4.2 Vegetative Com-.s..,ty Types Y r
be of scientific iotcrect? ( -
- Are there ve Sctati— Community tyres";Ch a-C -
per:icaiorly su-ccp.'iblc to impact fhr:m t:vmon activity
Are th_re mojor trees or major vcgr.tn how that -;,I -
hc cd:c-s^1�•nffr:ctr.-i by the proi.act? -
. •. .. f.rr: :I C.0 v_3=:c:ivc rnmmunity tynas r--.rr-:.,ti-r. Los
of wi,ich v:ill dcov Enna ar hobito• tr. i-.•?'?-'-c: .-:itali
species, or to a ;utia•.ntial nvm.L^-ar
r^ ( ( I
4_J Diversity is there svbsta�:inl diversity in th-: rv.,—rni '�r..�,ni:y I ( I
o,reflected in the -.-S"and type
species p•escot or the. thre--dim.:nsinnr.l
of p!ont species prcicor? -
• I i
( I I
CavlNE`lT ElCIS SCA= OF Ii%TA.CF
No c�IFzrD YES a.
NO
IPI � o
IM I (:_�
o I Io I
5.0 FACILITIES AND SERVICES I I t
5.1 Educotionol Facilities :. Will projectrd enrollments adversely effect the ex- ( I t
icing or p:op.scd Focilitics in terms of sooting for _ I
all activities, Including elessrooms, recreational
areas, and scoffing needs? I I 1
• Will the project impoc! the pvp;11t .Cher ratio so ✓ 1 I I I I .
as to impede the learning process?
Is the school located such that it presents a hardship.'
- for a portion of the enrollment in ter-ss of travel tsme,
distance, or safety hazards?
l 1 I i
5.2.Com erc;al Focilit;o, Will there be an inedegvote supply of and access to f 1 I 1
commercial facilities for the projec.?
'
• 5.3 Liquid Waste Di�osal Arc provisions for se+wgo ccpacity irsadtgwte for
- - the needs of the project without exec-cling gcolity
atondards? '
Will the project be exposed to nufsenccs and odors
associated with va0e titer treatmcn!plants? I f I I
5_4 Solid Wosla Disposal Is there inadequate provision for diTrosol of solid I 1
wostes generared by dse project? .. I
5.5 Water Supply Is there inodegvatc gwntity or gwlity of water ( I I !
supply to mac! the needs of ;!-P prpjcc�'? -
1 I !
5.6 Storm Water Drainage srYill storm w ter drainaec_ be incdcgvale ra prevent
donstream flooding and to meet Federal Store and
s•r
local stcrdcrds? I ( I
5-7 Police Will the project's additional populeric, , facilities,
or other features ecnero!c an in ccu in police scrv;ce I I
or create a police hazard? I I 1
Will the project's cdditioncl pcpulerien, fcciiilies,
5.8 Fire ( f i
or other feotvres gzne-rate on increase_ to lire services
or create o fire haxcrd?
9 Rcc project option
Will the have incdegwte fccilities to meet 1 tf
: I ( (
the recreational needs of the residents? I t
5_10 Cultvrol Facilities Will cultural Facilities 6e unawi!ablz to the project
residents? - � t I It i I
6.0 TRANSPOSTATION I I t
6.1 Transportation Facilities Are the traffic demands on adjacent roods cu really
at or above copocity? If not, will tie trcffic Gen
crated by the proje-L ccuse the acunt roads to { I I
_ reach or exceed capacity?.
Are the other transport r cn Facilities which serve the - � �. •'I I I I _ -
- project inadequate to accemnoc a ti•.c project's -
travel demonds7
6.2 Circulation Conflicts. ., Will design of the project or conditions in the surround-
ina area increase accidents due to.cireslation conflic'z.
6 J f Rood Safety and Design ;';ill project resident:oral users be exposed to incensed -
1
accident risks dun to rao2w y and street des;gn,or lack 1 I I
" of trcffic controls?
7.0 HEALTH I I
7.1 Odors Will the project be exposed to or Generate any intense
. odors? I 1
Will the residents and users be cxpaxd to crowding a
Gow /
7.2 dm ns g and De ty - Fl
high den;i:y to their piyucol living cnv�ronm cat? I ( I
7.3 Nuizanecs Will the project be exposed to or gcr.crote fac:ors that may be considered Os nuiscnccs? - i
7.4 Structural Safety Will design and propoud eomtruc:ipn tcciniquas fail
to meel,tta to and local building cedes?
1 1 1
8.0 NOISE
Will the project be expos�rl to rr 5cncratc advcrn v I I I
8.1 Noise Lcvols I I I
noise Icvrls7
8.2 �orotion, Will the pr.ajcct be expo!d to v nrctirns annoying to I I t
. haman,� 1 l 1
I 1 I
I I I
cc � ^ . IMP sc E or xrlP�cr
:o CkTALIFIED Yi.s rna�v
N.0
II � 0
• I I
N '
0 i 10 { o
9.0 COMMUNITY C'rv'•',ACTED
9.1 Community Orgooization Will the projcc:d;vvpt on existing s-t of -
- oreani_nt;ons or groups within th. corrmun;ty?
9.2 Homogeneity and D;vers;ty N{;;I the project change the choracter of the {
I I '
commun;ty in terms of dislr;bvtion or concenlrotion I " I I
of income, ethnic, housing, or age group? Z.
9_3 Cam u Ity StaSil;ry and Will the project be expos=d w or gtnccatc an I I I
Physscol Conditions arcs of poor stob;lity and physical con-i7llons�
r
10.0 VISU4L Q Ulk L ITY
Y{;i1 rcsidcnts of the surrounding ores be odverscly t
10_1 Views I i I
affected by vie—of or from the project? i 1
• V,;;i :he projcc: residents be edverrscly afFzc:ed by
_ v;e..-s of or from the surrounding area?
10.2 Shadows - the project be exposed to or generate cr.cess;ve
11.0 HISTORIC AND CULTU Al
-- �ESOI.r�s - . .: - - . - - i I I • ..
11_1 Historic and Cultural Will tho project involve the des!ructinn or after- -
ot;.^n of c historic re»urcc? '
' f;•_sources � _
Will +.e project rewlt in isolataon of e historic
rc5.^vrc_ irom its surroundino cnviro"ent?
\Y;II the project intrcdvcc phvsicol, v;sucl, audible f I
or c'^o:�herie elements thn:
are not in charec:cr withj'
0 6h:o:is re»�-cc or is sr_It;ng? I I
i 1 I I
11.2 Archoeo!oglecl Sites Wi;l :he Project involve th drstruc:;on or al:crohon
• and Structures of cn cchor_ological rc:nurce? _ I ( I I .
1 Will ;hc project result in isolation of co orchacalogical l -
. rc s�ssrcc?
•
Will the project ;nlrod-scc physical, v;-.ual, audible
or ct.m•ospher;c elements thot are not ;n charaCer with
I I
cr:ares:aeological resource or its attting. t I t
12.0 ENE=GY 1 I I
412_I Energy tquircmants Aec there potent;ol problems with the supply of If { I I
Wert;rcavircd for Rse project?
Will :hc cncrgy requirements exceed the capacity -
"' - or the s^rv;cc utility canpany?
:here be a net increase in energy used for the
project compered to the no project aiternct;ve? 1 -
I 1 {
12.2 Conserro tson Measures Does:be project planning and�!^sign fn;. to include
It=b!c cr,er Jy con:cr.in:ion m
13.0 LAND USE
• 13.1 S;:e 1'==arils Do ccrsditians of the sate, proposed site develop-^nt, (' ( I -
or xrrounding area vaote patcotiolly hazardous s;tu-
13.2 Physical Threat- v{;I! the proicet or the surcound;n-i onto create a feeling
of insecurity and physicol threat among the residents I I I
' and uscn7 I
13.3 Son;tcry landfall :Sc project bA exposc:f to arvttvrn!
no;ac, air, or rfcct nail r:oun,i water pollution Y ( 1
r•r q:htr nu;u,ncr,;asaxin:cJ with a san;tocy londf;II i
13.4 \':otcrwoys '.4';:: too projer.t o(fcct on exis h
ting..r_:cr-•ay throug I ( {
fiP.;no, dredging, draining, cul'Qrr,nJ, "lc dis-
chargcs, lou of visual quality or wk r land u:c { ( {
I I 1
I l 1
I I
. l I I
CallaD hNENT ?�IPACTS SCALE OF TiIP CT
'No QUALIFIED YES umalcG.N
NO
I t . I0
of IO10
I t t t
other Environm1enlal [a�ponentrp_�
C_ MANDATORY FINDINGS Op SIGNIFICANCE Qut�=
ti0 t0
. I
(j ) Does the project have the potential to degrade the .
_ f
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below selF-
sus-,a ining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant
'or animal communiry,: reduce the number or restrict t..
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or. eliminate important exa:-nples of t'n.e"major periods
or California history or prehistory
Does the ro'ect have the otent ial to cchieve.short
(2) o P I P
term;' to the disadvantage of-long-term, environmentcl
goals?
(3) Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited but cumu.lateively considercble? (A project
may impact on two or more separate resources where
the impact on each resource is relatively small, but
where the effect o` the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.)
(4) Does the project, have environmental effects which VII
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
D. MITIGATION MEASURES - Discussion of the ways to mitigo'e e significant effects
I identified, if any:
I \
E. DETERMINATION — On the basis of this initial evaluation:
The City''of_Dublih :finds that there will not:be`any significant effect_ The par-
- ticu]or characteristics of this project and the" mitigation
measures incorporated into `
the 'desian of the project provid,, `h�: `actual basis for the- finding_ A NEGATIVE.. -
DECLARATIO\ IS ?=QUIRED_
[� The City of ptablin ;finds that the preocsed project MAY have a sianificant effect .
on the en_ vironment_ AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED**
Signature and date: ��
Name and title: �[` C�c _TLA-fs-0(N GS (fz111tr2:_171_1(L _
4e .
1 ..
t� w�l
t TLe
'NOTE: Where a project Is rcvlsed 1n response to on Initial Study so tht7` adverse
effects are mitigated to a point where no signifia:nt environmentol effects would occur, a
C
revised Initial S,u.jy •,vill be prepared and a NeSative eclaration will be reauire:? i ns`ecd of
1,
is
:�-
_
;t
-OAKMONT MEMORIAL !PARK
OUBLIN . PROPERTY
n=RTPTTON OF PRO=
...The current church facility le.nds . itsa1. to .conversion to a
mortuary facility with only minor cosmetic changes . The mortuary
will be contained within the existing facility and will not '
require use ofthe portable buildings . It is currently
anticiapated that the portable buildings, will become vacant at
the end of 1983 , and will no longer be used For classroom
instruction . The anticipated changes will be in the access and
egress to the Facility , the paving . oF the parking area and the
drainage of the property . . The interior of the church will be
remodeled to upgrade the Facility and provide for oFFice space ,
casket display rooms , -visitation rooms , and the preparation area .
The chapel area wi11 remain basically the same with minor
improvements to meet the requirements of many faiths , rather than
one denomination .
sLTFTCr" TTQ
��T N FC1P P°OJEST
The Dublin- market area is not currently being served by . any . local
mortuary . .To the north Dub1in. residents 'must .:trave1 o.v.er 15
miles to the nearest - mortuary Facility :and to .the . south"over
7. miles The. cur,rent:popuIation oF .• the. south county area coupled
with the anticipated growth.°in the near :future points out : the
need .For a local. mortuary- Facility Vital statistyics ..,shcw that
ther.e were
123 deaths •lass year:.:oF residents. .in the Oublin/San
Ramo ,n city limits "Nand these Fami1ies .'and : their F,rien d s, were
F,ored to go .many miles . .for .mort�uary services that should, te
•
;- 'Provided * within their local - area .
This service .to the community can— be provided on a
local basis with the trans Formation of the Valley Christian
Center into a locally owned and professionally managed mortuary .
Oakmont Memorial Park has been serving - the residents of the
entire Diablo Valley area since 1956 . Our years of service
coupled with our mortuary experience make us uniquely qualiFied
to provide these services to the community of Oublin .
TO: CITY OF DUBLIN!
FROM: OAnMONT M-EMORIAL PARK
FR_P'VK R. HAS4TELL
RE:. PA ,.83-029
•• ITE21 ,r3 . (DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF •ACTIVITIES)
Market dzmographics indicate that a mortuary in the Dublin area will
service 100 families in its first. year of operation_'. Families served
are not an indication of the number of funerals provided by the facility_
Breakdown of the 100 ser-vices would be as follows: ,
100. Total Families served
30 .. Families — no service
10 Families - full service not at mortuary site
60 Families - full service at mortuary site
_ The averaGe funeral size at c= cemetery location has been 57 Dersons,
With t e average num_^er O_ persons _Der c= at 2.3 Persons_ Par{i ng
for funeral services t'vDlcaliv is not Gone by stalls but is done by
DrocesSlcn_
runeral services 2re typ1Ca11:T SC_^2.c::leQ•between 10:00 a.-. ana 3:00. a.i1_ .
w-th atten-c i°°S arr v-ing aocroXlmate-'v 30 minutes prior t0 *he Ser71Ce
and l eav i nC in-procession to the Ce3'.ete?"'V of the family's .choice
Item -3 -er of 'Emalovees) .`
The funeral nome/moruuarl will. he staffed _aith one .full. time funeral
-dl rector a d a receotionist. :. Su1:)Cc_t workers SLCh. as aCC011ntlT2C� ^ma30r' '
•clerical. needs and other :categories .wi11'be. done in 0='--Lalayette'ozz?ce '
and.will not,,reau, re anv -on-site D2rSOIInel
vj
-3 (T_ e. ana Amount'o� Service :De_�veries)
Ca5'.{eL. deliveries are
to be made on a weekly basis and will only involve
a' small delivery truck Laundry services will be bi-weekly and are
provided by commercial vans.
Page 2
Item n4 (Funeral Processions) ,
As discussed earlier,..approximately 60 -services will be proviaed from
the mortuary during its 'first year of operations- .,These services would
ideally "enterrfrom the paved access road on San Ramon Blvd_ and exit
on the one way' only 'exit. road onto San Ramon I Blvd_ . Funeral processions
will proceed south. on San Ramon Blvd_ and enter.the :580/680 freeway
system to proceed to any cemetery selected_ Travel 'in a northerly
direction. will proceed with the pattern and will then head north on 680. ,
.Item '5 (Day Care)
The Dav Care Center buildings are a=_y.icipated to be vacated by December
with the church moving those services to another location_ 1 e Zor'-uary
has. no need -or those buildings -at. t.=rs tine and will atte_mct to sell sa_-ne.
Item '6 (D:-ansi on)
The ap)r•CxlTate 41800 su ice. ilL'11d____ will handle the c:'___ _ �_
term grot,`n rates antic'_Oated by i..___=-eme_n T_^_ere:ore, ai
we are not anticipati ng any e.-aans_c
Item -7 (rte-hinder of Property)
•None. as o= this date- .
Item '8 (Lancscaping)
The .bu lei c will�ibe cleaned, pa' t re roofed as recess�ry The
SllrrOLLr'.C11ng Gardens will be t_rimr.ed edged,.and additional plant
J ng •,;i 11
t .Cn
be provided
to upgrade the appearance O- he faC�llty. Oa�i � C2 2t?ry
has skilled, trained, and licensee _ersonnel who have over 100 years o:
landscaoing and lawn care service -his skill 'will be uti Lied to upgrade
the outward appearance of the facility-
Item 9 (_licht Lighting)
See enclosed brochure.
Item '10
Mortuary facilities do not recuire anv special handling or care of
"refuse" . The standard disposal contractor will handle removal of trash
just as it is handled for other ret=ail outlets.
RESOLUTION NO. - 83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN -
--------------------------------------
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONCERNING
PA 83-029
OAKMONT MEMORIAL PARK
WHEREAS, 'theCalifornia Environmental 'Quality Act (CEQA) , as
. amended together with `the State ' s administrative guidelines for
:implementation .of the .*California Environmental Quality Act and
City -Environmental • regulations,' requires that."certain projects be
reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental :
documents be prepared; .and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared by the
Dublin Planning Department; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and adopt the
Negative Declaration at a public hearing on September 6, 1983 ;
and .
WHEREAS, a Councilmember filed an appeal of the Planning
Comission decision; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did review the Negative
Declaration and considered it at a public hearing on
September 26 , 1983 .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds
that the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in
accordance with State and local environmental law and guideline
regulations and that it is adequate and complete .
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of September,
1983 _
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
C . The use, under the circumstances and conditions of this
particular case, will negatively affect safety of persons
residing or working the vicinity, ;
d. The use will not encourage future retail shopper-good
development in the area;
e . The use will create parking and traffic circulation problems,
which will materially affect adjacent present, and future,
development and traffic .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin City
Council does hereby deny PA 83-029 Oakmont Memorial Park
Conditional Use Permit .
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of
::1983
AYES
NOES
ABSENT: _
Mayor
ATTEST.
City Clerk