HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.02 RedevFeasStudyRosenow
r
"If" ,.,.-s-,a
CITY CLERK
File # [J[6J[QJl(lJ..~lClJ
('
\
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCil MEETING DATE:. October 5, 1999
SUBJECT:
Consultant Services for Redevelopment Feasibility StudY@'
l1eport Prepared by: Christopher L. Foss, Economic Developm n.
Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving Agreement with Consultant
2. Consultant Services Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt Resolution Approving Agreement with Rosenow
Spevacek Group for Redevelopment Consulting Services
2. · Authorize the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City
,/fAi'/.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: Funds are available in FY 1999-2000 budget ($44,000)
r DESCRIPTION: The City Council identified the selection of a Redevelopment
\ Consultant to perform a Redevelopment Feasibility Analysis as one its high priority goals for FY 1999-
2000.
BACKGROUND:
F or the past two years, the City Council has identified the selection of a consultant to perform a
redevelopment feasibility analysis. Redevelopment is a tool available to local govemmentalentities to
revitalize deteriorating and blighted neighborhoods and/or business districts. In order for redevelopment
and its benefits to be utilized, a local legislative body' (the City Council) must pass an ordinance declaring
the need for. such an agency. Such an ordinance cannot be considered until a redevelopment feasibility
analysis is undertaken /
On January 9, 1999, the. City Council directed staff, to issue a Request for- QualificationslProposal
(RFQ/P) for. consultants to perform a redevelopment feasibility analysis ,on six (6) study areas within the
City limits. These areas include:
Western Dublin BART Station (Golden Gate Drive below Dublin Boulevard)
Village Parkway (between Dublin Boulevard and Amador Valley Parkway)
Montgomery WardslTarget
Scarlett Court area (between 1-580 and Dublin Boulevard)
(
\.
COPIES TO:
ITElVl NO.3Z
Wcc-forms/agdastmt.doc
San Ramon Village Shopping Center
Shamrock Village Shopping Center
io>
...
The Feasibility Analysis would include, among other things, a blight analysis. The blight analysis is
intended to identify study. areas that suffer from economic or physical blight as defined by California....".,
Redevelopment Law and is a determining factor in the viability of a redevelopment project as it is the
product on which an agency must spend its funding.
The original RFQIP was mailed to eleven (n) redevelopment consultants from throughout the State of
California. Following a review of the RFQ/P submittals, the City Council subcommittee (Lockhart and
Zika) and staff conducted interviews with the three finalists on May 14, 1999. For a number of reasons,
the City Council subcommittee could not recommend any of the consultants to complete the study.
On August 23, 1999, staffre-submittedthe RFQIP to two (2) additional firms. Staff received only one (1)
RFQ/P submittal from the Rosenow Spevacek Group on September 3, 1999..
On September 22, 1999, the subcommittee interviewed the Rosenow Spevacek Group and unanimously
recommended that the Rosenow Spevacek Group be forwarded for ratification by the entire City Council.
The proposal from the Rosenow Spevacek Group calls for the completion of the feasibility study in
approximately 20 weeks at a cost not to exceed $33,895. The work product will include an initial findings
report, a visioning session (if necessary), economic feasibility analysis, collateral public outreach
materials, and a fmal report. Staff conducted a reference check on the Rosenow Spevacek Group and their
references were exemplary.
RECOMMENDATION:
'-'
There are sufficient funds in the FY 1999-2000 budget to proceed with the work outlined in the proposal
submitted by the Rosenow Spevacek Group. It is therefore staff's recommendation that the City Council
approve the Consultant Services Agreement with the Rosenow Spevacek Group and authorize the City
Manager to sign on the City's behalf.
....J
.- ;2. -
~--'. . ,~ .
/4~9
RESOLUTION NO. - 99
e-'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ROSENOW SPEV ACEK GROUP
TO CONDUCT REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS, the City Council has identified the completion of a redevelopment feasibility study
as a high priority for FY 1999-2000; and
WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Qualifications/Proposals to qualified redevelopment
consulting fIrms and subsequently interviewed four (4) redevelopment consultants; and
WHEREAS, the Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. was determined to be the most qualified
consultant;
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
approve the agreement with the Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1999.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEN!:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 1
.J.. ;;( ;Z?
STANDARD CONTRACTUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made at Dublin, California, as of October 5, 1999, by and between the CITY ('1:'
DUBLIN, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. ("CONTRACTOR"), who ag~
as follows:
1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, CONTRACTOR shall
provide to CITY the services described in Exhibit A. CONTRACTOR shall provide said services at the time,
place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.
2. PAYMENT. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at
the time and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B. The payments specified in Exhibit B shall be the only payments
to be made to CONTRACTOR for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall submit all
billings for said services to CITY in the manner specified in Exhibit B; or, if no manner be specified in Exhibit B,
then according to the usual and customary procedures and practices which CONTRACTOR uses for billing clients
similar to CITY.
~
3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth in Exhibit C, CONTRACTOR shall, at its
sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment which may be required for furnishing services pursuant
to this Agreement. CITY shall furnish to CONTRACTOR only the facilities and equipment listed in Exhibit C
according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit C.
4. GENERAL PROVISIONS. The general prOVISIons set forth in Exhibit D are part of this
Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between said general provisions and any other terms or conditions of
this Agreement, the other term or condition shall control insofar as it is inconsistent with the general provisions.
5. EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred to herein are attached hereto and are by this reference
incorporated herein.
.....,
ATTACHMENT 2
3vf;;'~
6. CONTRACT ADMINISTRA nON. This Agreement shall be administered by Richard C. Ambrose
("ADMINISTRATOR"). All correspondence shall be directed to or through the ADMINISTRATOR or his or her
.,r--
;slgnee.
7. NOTICES. Any written notice to CONTRACTOR shall be sent to:
F elise Acosta, Principal
Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc.
540 North Golden Circle, Suite 305
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Any written notice to CITY shall be sent to:
City of Dublin Attn.: Richard Ambrose
P. O. Box 2340
Dublin. CA 94568
..,r--
Executed as of the day first above stated:
CITY OF DUBLIN
a municipal corporation
By
"CITY"
Attest:
City Clerk
By
"CONTRACTOR"
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
-'~
EXHIBIT A
Lj 4' ~'l
,
SCOPE OF SERVICES
....."
The Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. will provide redevelopment consulting servIces to the City of Dublin
regarding
. Comprehensive Review of the physical and economic conditions that exist within the six study areas
. Evaluation of the economic viability of implementing a redevelopment project in the study areas
. Tasks include:
Blight Analysis
Initial Findings Report
Visioning Study Session
Economic Analysis
Public Outreach
Presentation of Final Report
The proposal from Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. has been attached for detail and reference.
Said services shall be performed at the direction of the City Manager or his designee.
~
-..",
EXHIBIT B
s ~ eJ.'1
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
~
CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR an amount not to exceed Thirty Three Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety
Five ($33,895) for consulting services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. The rate is inclusive of all
staff support and no additional amounts shall be payable for faxing, postage, messengers and other material costs.
CONTRACTOR shall submit bi-monthly/monthly invoices during the term of this Agreement.
The total sum stated above shall be the total which CITY shall pay for the services to be rendered by
CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement. CITY shall not pay any additional sum for any expense or cost
whatsoever incurred by CONTRACTOR in rendering services pursuant to this Agreement.
CITY shall make no payment for any extra, further or additional service pursuant to this Agreement unless
~ch extra service and the price therefor is agreed to in writing executed by the City Manager or other designated
...l.icial of CITY authorized to obligate CITY thereto prior to the time such eA"tra service is rendered.
The services to be provided under this Agreement may be terminated without cause at any point in time in
the sole and exclusive discretion of CITY. In this event, CITY shall compensate the CONTRACTOR for all
outstanding costs incurred as of the date of written notice thereof and shall terminate this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall maintain adequate logs and timesheets in order to verify costs incurred to date.
The CONTRACTOR is not authorized to perform any services or incur any costs whatsoever under the
terms of this Agreement until receipt of a fully executed Purchase Order from the Finance Department of the City
of Dublin.
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 1
5/4/99
b ff~f
EXHIBIT C
CITY shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, as may~
reasonably necessary for CONTRACTOR'S use while consulting with CITY employees and reviewing records and
the information in possession of CITY. The location, quantity, and time of furnishing said physical facilities shall
be in the sole discretion of CITY. In no event shall CITY be obligated to furnish any facility which may involve
incurring any direct expense, including, but not limiting the generality of this exclusion, long-distance telephone or
other communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities.
'-'
'...I
Exhibit C
Page 1 of1
5/4/99
7 ff ct9
EXHIBIT D
GENERAL PROVISIONS
~.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
At all times during the term of this Agreement,
1.
CONTRACTOR shall be an independent contractor and shall not be an employee of CITY. CITY shall have the
right to control CONTRACTOR only insofar as the results of CONTRACTOR'S services rendered pursuant to this
Agreement; however, CITY shall not have the right to control the means by which CONTRACTOR accomplishes
services rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
2. LICENSES: PERMITS: ETC. CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to CITY that he has all
licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for
CONTRACTOR to practice his profession.
CONTRACTOR represents and warrants to CITY that
CONTRACTOR shall, at his sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement
any licenses, permits, and approvals which are legally required for CONTRACTOR to practice his profession.
3. TIME. CONTRACTOR shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this
Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for satisfactory performance of CONTRACTOR'S obligations
~
. ..rrsuant to this Agreement.
4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of
the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the CONTRACTOR, his agents, representatives,
employees or subcontractors.
(a) Minimum Scope ofInsurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Insurance Services Office form number GL 0002 (Ed. ~/73) covering comprehensive General
Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 covering Broad Form
Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General
Liability coverage ("occurrence" form CG 0001.)
2. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability,
code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025.
,,-
3.
Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California
and Employers Liability Insurance.
Exhibit D
Page 1 of5
5/4/99
-'=-
'? if ~l
(b) Minimum Limits of Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall maintain limits no less than:
1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If commercial General Liability Insurance or other form "''''''''
a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
3. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as
required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000
per accident.
(c) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be
declared to and approved by the CITY. At the option of the CITY, either the insurer shall reduce or
eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the CITY, its officers, officials and
employees; or the CONTRACTOR shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration and defense expenses.
(d) Other Insurance Provisions. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the followin"t'
prOVISIOns:
1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages.
a. The CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of
the CONTRACTOR; products and completed operations of the CONTRACTOR,
premises owned, occupied or used by the CONTRACTOR, or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by the CONTRACTOR. The coverage shall contain no
special limitations on the scope of the protection afforded to the CITY, its officers,
officials, employees or volunteers.
.....".
Exhibit D
Page 2 of 5
5/4/99
9 ~ cJ.?
b. The CONTRACTOR'S insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the
/~
CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by the CITY, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the CONTRACTOR'S insurance and shall not contribute with it.
c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect
coverage provided to the CITY, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
d. The CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall apply separately to each insured against
whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the
insurer's liability.
2. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage.
The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of. subrogation against the CITY, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the
CONTRACTOR for the CITY.
(e)
Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than
,r---.
A:VIL
(f)
Verification of Coveral2:e. CONTRACTOR shall furnish CITY with certificates of insurance and
with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates and
endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to
bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by
the CITY before work commences. The CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified
copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
(g) Subcontractors. CONTRACTOR shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or
shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for
subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
(h) The Risk Manager of CITY may approve a variation in those insurance requirements upon a
determination that the coverages, scope, limits and forms of such insurance are either not
commercially available or that the CITY's interests are otherwise fully protected.
..c-
Exhibit D
Page 3 of5
5/4/99
/~ qj cJ..7
,
3. CONTRACTOR NO AGENT. Except as CITY may specify in writing, CONTRACTOR shall have no
authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of CITY in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.
CONTRACTOR shall have no authority, express or implied, pursuant to this Agreement to bind CITY,~
any obligation whatsoever.
4. ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITED. No party to this Agreement may assign any right or obligation pursuant to
this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation pursuant to this
Agreement shall be void and of no effect.
5. PERSONNEL. CONTRACTOR shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this
Agreement. In the event that CITY, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement,
desires the removal of any such persons, CONTRACTOR shall, immediately upon receiving notice from
CITY of such desire of CITY, cause the removal of such person or persons.
6. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE. CONTRACTOR shall perform all services required pursuant to this
Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the
profession in which CONTRACTOR is engaged in the geographical area in which CONTRACTOR
practices his profession. All instruments of service of whatsoever nature which CONTRACTOR deliver~
to CITY pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a substantial, first class and workmanlike mann~
and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing in CONTRACTOR's
profession.
7. HOLD HARMLESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTORS. CONTRACTOR shall take all
responsibility for the work, shall bear all losses and damages directly or indirectly resulting to him, to any
subcontractor, to the CITY, to CITY officers and employees, or to parties designated by the CITY, on
account of the performance or character of the work, unforeseen difficulties, accidents, occurrences or other
causes predicated on active or passive negligence of the CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor.
CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY, its officers, officials, directors,
employees and agents from and against any or all loss, liability, expense, claim, costs (including costs of
defense), suits, and damages of every kind, nature and description directly or indirectly arising from the
performance of the work. This paragraph shall not be construed to exempt the CITY, its employees and
officers from its own fraud, willful injury or violation oflaw whether willful or negligent.
~
Exhibit D
Page 4 of5
5/4/99
)/ of--<r
For purposes of Section 2782 of the Civil Code the parties hereto recognize and agree that this agreement is
not a construction contract. By execution of this agreement CONTRACTOR acknowledges and agrees that
he has read and understands the provisions hereof and that this paragraph is a material element of
consideration.
Approval of the insurance contracts does not relieve the CONTRACTOR or subcontractors from liability
under this paragraph.
8. GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal
assistance from another governmental entity, CONTRACTOR shall comply with all applicable rules and
regulations to which CITY is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program.
9. DOCUMENTS. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda or
other written documents or materials prepared by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement shall
become the property of CITY upon completion of the work to be performed hereunder or upon termination
of the Agreement.
~.
/...--. '
Exhibit D
Page 5 of5
5/4/99
-"-
/~ ,01 ~.1
City of Dublin
......"
Proposal for
Redevelopment Feasibility
Study Services
'....",
Contact:
Felise Acosta, Principal
Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc.
540 North Golden Circle, Suite 305
Santa Ana, Califomia 92705
Phone 714.541.4585
Fax 714.836.1748
Email RSGlncCA@aoLcom
..."",
-"-
;3 :{;2..'1
~.
Introduction
The City of Dublin (the "City") is seeking a highly qualified redevelopment consultant to conduct a
feasibility study (the "Study") to determine if six (6) potential areas (the "Study Areas") will legally
qualify for redevelopment Primary elements of the Study will address the following:
Does each of the areas meet blight and urbanization requirements to justify the use of
redevelopment?
Is redevelopment of these areas financially and politically feasible?
What would a redevelopment plan adoption effort cost?
What will the adoption process entail and will there be a need to form a Project Area Committee?
What will be the timeline of activities and the cost to form a project area?
~
What is the public sentiment within the community regarding the potential of establishing a
redevelopment district or districts within the City?
The purpose of the Feasibility Study is to evaluate the Study Areas and present recommendations
on whether to proceed with redevelopment plan adoption, and if so, the parameters within which to
proceed.
Firm Background
RSG has processed over ninety (90) redevelopment project area formations and redevelopment
plan amendments. We have a proven track record of preparing thoughtful and definitive feasibility
studies and conducting successful plan adoptions. We are known for providing all necessary
assistance to cities and agencies efficiently and proceeding through the redevelopment process In
a cost-effective manner. The following clients can attest to our timely and responsive delivery, and
quality work products:
Greg Brown, Director of Community Development, Port Hueneme Redevelopment Agency
.. _..... ...... _........................... _.. _...... _..................................................................................... (805) 986-6553
(1997 Feasibility Study and Adoption NCEL [Military Base Reuse] Redevelopment Plan and 1998
Central Community Feasibility Study and Project Area Amendment)
Robert-Goldin, Community Development Director, City of Lawndale........................... (310) 970-2100
(1997 & 1999 Feasibility Study and adoption of the Lawndale Economic Revitalization Project
Redevelopment Plan)
/"~"
Terrence Belanger, City Manager, City of Diamond BaL............................................. (909) 396-5667
(1996 Feasibility Study and 1997 Diamond Bar Economic Development Project Redevelopment
Plan adoption)
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP. INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
- 1 -
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
/~ qf .;1.1
, .
Susan Evans, Assistant Director, Burbank Redevelopment Agency ........................... (818) 238-5180
(1996 Feasibility Study and 1997 South San Fernando Project Redevelopment Plan adoption)
'....,p
Ken Hobbs, Director, Hercules Redevelopment Agency.............................................. (510) 799-8200
(1997 Tenth Township Redevelopment Plan adoption and the Legacy Redevelopment Plan
adoption)
Ronald Kiedrowski, Community Development Director, San Pablo Redevelopment Agency
......................................... ...... .......... ......... .......... ............ ................... ............. ... ............... (51 0) 215-3040
(1999 Project Area 2 Redevelopment Plan adoption)
....",I
~
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
-2-
CITY OF DUBUN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBilITY STUDY SERVICES
IS- c4;29
Scope Of Services
The following Scope of Services outlines RSG's approach to evaluating the feasibility of including
the Study Areas within a redevelopment project area pursuant to the August 23, 1999 Request for
Proposals ("RFP").
RSG's engagement efforts would primarily involve a comprehensive review of the physical and
economic conditions that exist within the Study Areas. RSG would also evaluate the economic
viability of implementing a redevelopment project in the Study Area. In this manner, the City will be
appraised of both the legal and economic feasibility of establishing a redevelopment project
Task 1 - Blight Analysis
The purpose of this task is to ascertain whether there is sufficient evidence of blight within the Study
Areas to warrant the creation of a redevelopment project
r---
. Convene Scoping Meeting with Staff: RSG will meet with assigned staff and legal counsel
to refine the work effort, discuss critical issues, and identify City officials who may be of
assistance in assembling information for the Study.
. Collect and Analyze Baseline Data: Either during the initial project team meeting or
immediately thereafter, RSG will obtain data on code enforcement violations, crime statistics,
business tumovers, real estate vacancies, infrastructure deficiencies, and land use
impediments to substantiate the extent of the social, physical, or economic problems in the
Study Areas. This information would be compared to similar statistics for other areas of the
City.
. Perform Land Use/Blight Study: RSG will conduct a parcel level land use and blight survey
of the Study Areas. This survey will document urbanization, land use, and physical and
economic conditions as defined in Redevelopment Law, as well as surface potential
redevelopment opportunities. Findings of the survey will be tabulated and included in the
feasibility report document
. Parcel Level Assessments: Using our parcel management database and assessment
information from the Alameda County Assessor's Roll, RSG will identify the ownership,
assessment, and sales data for each parcel in the Study Areas.
Task 2-lnitial Findings Report
,-~-
Using the information collected and analyzed to date, RSG will prepare a report of our initial
findings that will be forwarded to the City Council. The report will provide the Council with our
assessment as to which, if any, of the six (6) Study Areas would qualify as blighted under Califomia
Redevelopment Law (the "CRL").
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP. INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
-3-
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAl FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
-:.
/t.~.2t
Task 3 - Vision Study Session
~
RSG will facilitate a half-day study session with the City Council, Planning Commission and City
Staff to define a vision for those areas that have been primarily determined as meeting the CRL
standards of blight The study session will discuss potential and desired development for the
qualffied areas.
Task 4 - Economic Analysis
As part of the feasibility study effort, RSG also proposes to evaluate the economic feasibility of
implementing a redevelopment project involving the qualified Study Areas, both separately and
collectively. This task would generate tax increment revenue projections and a bond capacity
analysis; this information would then be employed to identify the anticipated financial resources to
fund implementation activities.
Develop Tax Increment Revenue Model: Using the County's 1999-2000 tax roll, RSG will
develop tax increment revenue projections involving taxable secured and unsecured properties
within the qualified Study Areas. This revenue model will consider the impacts of potential new
land uses as developed in the Visioning Session, and will indicate the annual amount of tax
increment to be deposited into the low and moderate income housing fund, the amount to be paid
to affected taxing entities, and the remaining non housing funds available to the Agency. The model
will also indicate the cumulative and net present value of these amounts, and estimate the
redevelopment projecfs bonding capacity to finance improvement activities. Charts and graphs will
compliment this presentation.
~
Task 5 Public Outreach to Assess Political Feasibility
RSG will provide necessary expertise and information to explain redevelopment to the community.
RSG will prepare a newsletter to be mailed by the City to the tenants and property owners within
the qualified Study Areas. If desired the City may provide this information to all City residents and
business. Additionally, RSG will conduct two (2) town hall meetings to discuss redevelopment and
solicit community input
-
RSG will prepare newsletter and mailing list of property owners. With Cfty assistance, a business
tenant listing will be compiled through business license information. Labels will be provided to the
Cfty for the mailing. If desired by the Cfty, RSG can provide the needed services to mail the
newsletter. This service is not included in the not-to-exceed fee and would be billed on a cost plus
10% basis
Task 6 - Review Issues/Present Recommendations
Information compiled through Tasks 1 and 5 will be aggregated in the Study report that will identify
the opportunities and constraints associated with a redevelopment project involving the Study
Areas. Specific activities associated with this task are as follows:
~
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP. INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
-4-
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
-"-
/ '1 c;if ;<.9
~
. Meet with Project Team to Present Preliminary Findings: RSG will review blight and
other economic and physical conditions within the Study Areas, as well as the tax projections
and overall financial capacity. This presentation will pennit staff to comment on these findings
and critique RSG's recommendations.
. Prepare Feasibility Study ReportlPresent Recommendations: The blight and feasibility
findings will be incorporated into draft and final feasibility study reports; the reports will also
present RSG's altematives and recommended courses of action. Areas of focus will include:
1) Findings of blight
2) Economic feasibility analysis
3) Suggested project area boundaries
4) Recommendations on redevelopment program structure and implementation activities
5) The next steps necessary to establish a redevelopment project
6) Anticipated costs associated with establishing a redevelopment project
7) A suggested community participation process
~
Schedule
RSG is prepared to commence work on this engagement within the next 30 days. The Initial
Findings Report will be completed by December 31, 1999 for review by staff. Visioning meeting
and community meetings would be held in January of 2000, with the draft and final Feasibility Study
presented to the City in February of 2000.
.~
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
-5-
CI1Y OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILI1Y STUDY SERVICES
/ % b";) ;1.-'7<
Project Management Approach
~
Over the course of nearly twenty years, RSG has provided redevelopment plan adoption consultant
services on over ninety (90) separate projects. Our success rate has been a direct result of RSG's
commitment to assuring that every detail of the engagement is managed efficiently and thoroughly.
Consultant Team
TIl.e following personnel would be assigned to this engagement in the indicated capacities. Their
respective resumes ar!3 included at the end of this section. .
Felise Acosta, Project ManagerIManaging Principal
Ms. Acosta will be the Project Manager for this assignment In this role, she will direct the
preparation of all documents, attend meetings, and formulate the proposed redevelopment
strategies. Ms. Acosta has recent experience in the area of redevelopment project feasibility
analyses, including engagements in the Cities of Burbank, Diamond Bar, Lawndale, Port Hueneme
and San Bernardino, California and Sparks, Nevada. Each of these efforts has proceeded to the
preparation of a redevelopment plan. .~
James C. Simon, Associate
Mr. Simon will be responsible for the day-to-day activities of this assignment, including document
preparation, financial analysis, and data review. Mr. Simon has worked in this capacity for many of
RSG's plan adoption engagements, including assignments for the Cities of Chula Vista, Fountain
Valley, Hercules, and San Pablo, California and Sparks, Nevada.
Michael Garcia~ Analyst
Mr. Garcia will provide support services to the RSG staff for this engagement In this capacity, he
would assist with document preparation and data compilation and synthesis. Mr. Garcia has
participated on feasibility study activities in the communities of San Buenaventura, Lawndale, and
San Bernardino.
Gary Gyves, Analyst
Mr. Gyves will also provide support services to the RSG staff for this engagement. In this capacity,
he would assist with document preparation and data compilation and synthesis. Mr. Gyves has
participated on feasibility study activities in the communities of Carlsbad, Huntington Park,
Huntington Beach, California and Sparks, Nevada.
""""
ROSENOWSPEVACEKGROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
-6-
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
..-:.
1111027
~
In-House Resources
RSG has aggressively integrated computer applications into our data managemen~ economic
analysis, fiscal projection, document preparation, and client interface activities. Our capabilities in
these areas are as follows:
. Data Management: RSG employs a customized parcel-based data management system to
store, categorize and summarize land use, situs condition, assessment information, and
infrastructure data. This system incorporates a graphics component that facilitates the
presentation of data in tabular and graphic formats.
. County Assessment Roll: RSG subscribes to the Transamerica/Metroscan property
information' service for 1999-2000 Alameda County assessment and ownership information.
This CD-ROM product will be an integral component of RSG's engagement; permitting rapidly
affordable access to sales comparables, assessed values, and parcel maps.
. Document Preparation: RSG utilizes Microsoft@ Word for Windows 7.0 for document
preparation; this program can read and write most IBM-PC and Macintosh files, and is capable
of converting files into all major word processing applications. Spreadsheets are generated
employing Microsoft@ Excel 6.0, which is fully compatible with Lotus 1-2-3.
. E-Mail: In our capacity as contract staff to client agencies, RSG is required to prepare letters,
memos, resolutions, and staff reports formatted for client stationery, ready for signature. We
transmit these documents and associated data via e-mail.
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
-7-
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBilITY STUDY SERVICES
..;:.
~D &J c2 r
Consultant Team Resumes
~
Felise Acosta
Rosenow Spevacek Group - Principal
Project Manager for clients requiring services in redevelopment planning, economic development,
finance activities and developer/public sector coordination. Specializes in redevelopment project
area implementation and formation, economic development programs, redevelopment and bond
financing. Has directed the creation or amendment of project areas for the Cities of Buena Park,
Carson, Fontana, Palm Desert, Poway, Orange, and the Inland Valley Development Authority
(IVDA) for the Norton Air Force Base and the Victor Valley Development Authority for the George
Air Force Base.
Project implementation experience includes: coordination of Disposition and Development
Agreement process for redevelopment agencies; development pro forma analysis; the acquisition,
relocation and disposition process required for project implementation; commercial and residential
rehabilitation, and local agency financial analysis and planning for numerous clients throughout
southern Califomia.
City of Buena Park, California - Community Development Officer
Directed and managed the activities of the Redevelopment Agency, the City's HCDBG and
Economic Development programs supervising a staff of seven, an annual budget of $14 million,
and two Redevelopment Project Areas totaling over 1,000 acres. Was responsible for Agency's ~.
cash flow and preparation as five year financial implementation plan, directed the Agency bond
financing program. Managed numerous site assembly projects. Negotiated with developers for
acquisition and development of sites in the project areas, acted as chief staff liaison with
Redevelopment Agency Board, Project Area Committee, and Citizens Advisory Committee.
City of Carson, California - Assistant Planner
Staff to both the planning and redevelopment divisions responsible for current and long-range
planning projects, environmental review, and planning support for the block grant program.
Orange County Transit District - Planning Aide
Staff support for Rapid Transit-Corridor Study. Responsible for conducting and analysis of land use
study of potential station locations.
EDUCATION
B.A Califomia State University, Long Beach - Urban Geography
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, Southern California Chapter
California Association for Local Economic Development
'....,,1
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2, 1999
-8-
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
2 / ~ 21
(~
Consultant Team Resumes
James C. Simon
Rosenow Spevacek Group - Associate
Handles annual reporting requirements and creates bonding capacity, cash-flow, and capital
improvement program budgeting analyses. Develops annexation, incorporation, and
reorganization studies for cities and special districts, housing and five-year implementation plans,
development impact reports, and pro forma analysis. Prepares documentation for redevelopment
plan adoptions. Mr. Simon has worked in these capacities for the County of San Diego and the
Cities of Chula Vista, La Quinta, EI Cajon, Solana Beach, Huntington Beach, Coronado, and Palm
Springs. He has also consulted various non-City clients, including the Los Angeles Unified School
Distric~ the Bahan Family Trust, and Coto de Caza, Ltd.
Rosenow Spevacek Group - Senior Analyst
Assisted project manager in redevelopment plan adoption and implementation activities, including
compilation and analysis of property information management system. Forecasted revenues and
expenditures for debt financings. Conducted field assessment surveys of property conditions and
businesses. Mr. Simon has worked in these capacities for the Cities of Palm Desert, Carlsbad, Big
Bear Lake, Ontario, and Lemon Grove.
,~
EDUCATION
University of California, Irvine - Certificate in Light Construction and Development Management (in
progress)
University of California, Irvine - Certificate in Marketing for the Residential Builder (in progress)
BA California State University, Fullerton - Business Administration - Entrepreneurial Management
Concentration
MEMBERSHIPS
Commissioner, City of Laguna Niguel Planning Commi~sion (1998-1999)
City of Laguna Niguel Environmental Review Board, City Council Appointee (1996-1998)
ROSENOW sPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
-9-
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
.....
;2 J- .,~.:41
Consultant Team Resumes
.....,
Michael L Garcia
Rosenow Spevacek Group - Analyst
Responsible for assisting with redevelopment plan adoptions and amendments, implementation
activities, bond issues. and planning and scheduling project activities. Assignments include
revenue projections. data analysis/gathering, database design/management, and document
preparation. Mr. Garcia has worked in this capacity for the Cities of Santa Ana, San Marcos,
. Rohnert Park, Port Hueneme, EI Monte, La Quinta. LawndaJe, Riverside, Santa Barbara, Fountain
Valley and Lemon Grove.
City of Santa Ana, Personnel Services - Personnel Technician
Performed recruitment/selection and classification/compensation duties for City departments.
Assisted in performing classification and compensation studies and reports, and completing salary
and benefit surveys. Assisted in answering Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and
Department of Fair Employment and Housing requests for information. Designed databases for
City programs and reporting requirements. Compiled information for employee grievance and
discipline investigations. Analyzed and drafted language for employee Union provisions. Provided
research assistance to other City departments for grant applications.
City of Santa Ana, Economic Development - Senior Administrative Intern
.....,
Assisted in business retention and attraction activities of companies for the City. Marketed the
Enterprise Zone, Foreign Trade Zone and Fac;:ade Improvement Rebate Program. Assisted in
implementing the Santa Ana Enterprise Zone. Coordinated the Fac;:ade Improvement Rebate
Program for companies located in Redevelopment Project Areas. Conducted eligibility verification
for the Job Training Partnership Act and the Targeted Jobs Tax Credit- Conducted surveys and
presented findings.
UCI Irvine, University Advancement - Corporate Affairs Intern
Conducted prospect research for the Unive~ity Advancement department at UCI. Developed
strategies for establishing a relationship between corporations, chief executives, and the university.
Assisted in writing grant applications and efforts to obtain private foundation funding. Assisted in
coordinating and conducting university tours for corporate executives and governmental dignitaries.
EDUCATION
M.P.A California State University Fullerton - Public Administration (Concentration - Urban
Planning and Management)
BA University of California Irvine - Political Science
~
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2,1999
-10-
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
-:0
;{3 ~e27
,r----
Consultant Team Resumes
Gary M. Gyves
Rosenow Spevacek Group - Analyst
Responsible for assisting with redevelopment plan amendments, project planning, market studies,
budget analysis, research, fieldwork and document preparation. Responsible for the preparation
and analysis of sales tax, property tax and other municipal revenues. Assists in the preparation of
fiscal impact reports related to incorporations and annexations. Assists in the analysis of the
feasibility of project and related real estate acquisition. Mr. Gyves has worked in this capacity for
the Cities of EI C;;ajon, Lawndale, La Quinta, Covina, Fontana, and Sparks, Nevada.
Wall Street Relations Group - Analyst
Responsible for the research and analysis of companies and their respective industries looking for
funding or public relations. Assisted in helping clients with initial public offerings and secondary
offerings. Wrote press releases associated with new development for client companies.
EDUCATION
SA California State University Fullerton - Finance
;-.
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2, 1999
-11 -
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SE~YJCES
). I 11,,17
Price Proposal
RSG proposes to provide the services outlined in the Scope of Services on a time-and-materials
basis for a fee not-to-exceed $33,895, as detailed in the following estimated budget
CITY OF DUBLIN
REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY
Principal Senior Senior Analyst Research Word Clerical
Associate Analyst . Assistant Processor
AREAS OF @$13O @ $100 @$80 @$70 @$SO @$40 @$30 Total
CONSULTANT SERVICE Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours
Area 1- Field Survey & Preparation a 16 16 4 2 0 0.5 $4,315
Area 2- Blight Analysis a 16 12 a 4 0.5 $4,375
Area 3 - Initial Finding Report 4 20 a a 2 4 1 $4,010
Area 4 - Vision Study Session 10 2 0 2 0 2 1 $1,750
Area 5 - Financial Feasibility Analysis a 16 a 0 0 2 1 $3,390
Area 6 - Public Outreach 16 a 4 0 0 4 1 $3,395
Area 7- Feasibility Analysis Report &
Presentation 30 20 12 a 6 4 1 $7,910
SUBTOTAL 84 98 60 30 14 16 6 $29,145
---
Expenses & Contingency Sll5Q
TOTAL ESTIMATE $33,895
- -
The not to exceed fee includes presentation of the Initial Finding Report to the City Council, Vision Study Session,
preparation of the required newsletter to be mailed by the City, two (2) town hall meetings, and individual
presentations of the Study to Planning Commission and City Council. Meetings with the City Councilor Planning
Commission in excess of the those listed above are outside of the not to exceed fee and upon authorization by the
City wi11 be billed on a time and materials basis. Printing, assembly and mailing of the Newsletter is not included,
however these services can be provided upon request of the City bi11ed on a cost plus 10% basis. Further, one (1)
original and five (5) copies of the Initial Report and Studyare included in the fee and will be provided. Additional
copies, and other expenses will be billed at cost plus 10%.
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2,1999
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
-12-
-"-
~
"-"
"-"
~s vcJ ,;<'1
.~
This fee will be based on the following hourly fee charge:
Position Billing
Rate
Principal $ 130
Senior Associate 100
Senior Analyst 80
Analyst 70
Research Assistant 50
Word Processor 40
Clerical 30
Invoicing: Invoices will be issued monthly and are payable upon receip~ unless otherwise agreed
upon in advance. Invoices will identify tasks completed to date, hours expended and the hourly
rate.
Scope of Work Modification: In the event the scope of work should change to a degree that
would alter the fee, RSG will contact the Agency in writing and submit a revised fee schedule prior
to the commencement of work. Requests for extra work will be documented, and a completion
time and compensation amount will be submitted for approval prior to initiating work.
Reimbursable Expenses: Cost plus 10%
~
It is RSG's policy to not charge clients for auto mileage, parking, telephone-fax expense, postage,
and incidental copies. We do, however, charge clients for additional insured certificates,
messenger services, Express Mail/Federal Express costs, and extra copies of reports, documents,
notices and support material. These costs are charged at actual expense, plus a 10% surcharge.
Insurance Coverage
RSG carries general liabifity insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit per
occurrence with a $2,000,000 general aggregate; fire damage liability in the amount of $50,000;
and medical expense liabifity of $5,000; automobile Iiabifity for non-company owned automobiles in
the amount of $1,000,000 combined single limits; $1,000,000 professional liability; and worker's
compensation and employer's liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000. A Certificate of
Insurance will be supplied upon request
RSG provides all employees with full-paid medical insurance coverage.
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2, 1999
-13-
CrTY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILrTY STUDY SERVICES
...;:,
;{b
oj ;if
Statement of Qualifications
...."",
This section summarizes the redevelopment project adoption/amendment engagements wherein
RSG has prepared the required redevelopment and financial documents; managed the adoption
activities; and staffed project area committee and community meetings. To date, RSG has
managed over 90 redevelopment formation/amendment/merger projects.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
San Pablo Redevelopment Agency
Tenth Township Amendment
Legacy Redevelopment Project
Adopted 3/97
Adopted 3/97
Hercules Redevelopment Agency
Dynamite Project Area Amendment
Scheduled 12/98
KERN COUNTY
Califomia City Redevelopment Agency
Project Area Adoption
Adopted 7/88
..."
Ridgecrest Redevelopment Agency
Project Area Adoption
Project Area Amendment
Adopted 11/86
Adopted 6/91
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Bell Community Development Agency Project Area No. 1 and No.2 Merger/ Adopted 7/86
Project Area NO.1 Amendment
-
Bell Gardens Redevelopment Agency Project Area Adoption Considered 6/87
Redevelopment Plan Amendment Scheduled for 1/99
Burbank Redevelopment Agency South San F.emando Adopted 6/97
Redevelopment Project
City Centre Eminent Domain Amendment Adopted 2/99
West Olive Plan Amendment Scheduled 412000
Carson Redevelopment Agency Eminent Domain Amendment to P A NO.1 Adopted 6/96
Eminent Domain Amendment to PA No.3 Adopted 6/96
6th Amendment to P.A. NO.1 Adopted 7/96
AmendmentIMerger of P A 2 & 3 Adopted 7/96
"wIfIJl
Compton Redevelopment Agency Project Area Amendment Adopted 11/92
ROSENOWSPEVACEKGROUP,INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
-14-
CrTY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILrTY STUDY SERVICES
~1trf;L'1
~
Cudahy Redevelopment Agency
Second Projed Area Amendment
Third Projed Area Amendment
Adopted 11/92
Adopted 7/93
Culver City Redevelopment Agency
Projed Area No.1 Amendment
Adopted 12/89
Diamond Bar Redevelopment Agency
Economic Revitalization Projed Area
Adopted 7/97
EI Monte Redevelopment Agency
Downtown Projed Area Amendment
Scheduled 612000
Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency
Projed Area Amendment
Adopted 10/95
Lawndale Redevelopment Agency
Economic Revitalization Project
Adopted 6/99
Lomita DeveloPlT!ent Commission
Lomita Improvement Project
Pending
Santa Monica Redevelopment Agency
Earthquake Recovery Project
Adopted 6/94
West Hollywood Redevelopment Agency
Eastside Redevelopment Project
Adopted 6/97
Whittier Redevelopment Agency
Whittier Boulevard Project Area Amendment Adopted 11/92
Greenleaf Project Area Amendment Adopted 1994
ORANGE COUNTY
Brea Redevelopment Agency Project Area AB Amendment Adopted 12/97
Buena Park Redevelopment Agency Central Business District Amendment Adopted 7/81
Project Area No. II Adoption Adopted 7/86
Fountain Valley Agency for Industrial Area Amendment Adopted 4/97
Community Development
Garden Grove Community Project Area AmendmentlMerger Adopted 7/92
Development Agency
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Project Area AmendmentlMerger Adopted 12/96
La Palma Community Development Agency Project Area Adoption Adopted 11/82
Mission Viejo Community Projed ~a Adoption' Adopted 7/92
Development Agency
Orange County Community Santa Ana Heights Project Area Adopted 1986
Development Agency Santa Ana Heights Amendment Scheduled for 7/98
Orange Redevelopment Agency Tustin Street Projed Area Amendment Adopted 7/88
Northwest Project Area Adoption Adopted 7/88
Southwest Projed Area Amendment Adopted 7/88
Southwest Amendment No.3 Adopted 7/96
~,
Santa Ana Community Development Agency South Main Projed Area Amendment Adopted 7/95
Inter-City Project Area Merger Abandoned
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2, 1999
-15-
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
--:.
North Harbor Project Area Amendment
South Harbor Project Area Amendment
?f ? r;2. 'f~
Abandoned
Adopted 1992
.....,.,.
Westminster Redevelopment Agency
Feasibility Study to Delete Amendment No.4 Completed
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Corona Redevelopment Agency
Downtown & Project Area "A" Adopted 7/98
Merger/Amendment
Hemet Redevelopment Agency
CitylSchool Project Area
Combined Commercial Project Area
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
Project Area No.2 Adoption
Project Area No.1 Amendment
Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency
Project Area No.3' Adoption
Project Area NO.4 Adoption
Abandoned 7/92
Adopted 4/96
Adopted 4/89
Adopted 3/95
Adopted 7/90
Adopted 7/93
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Big Bear Lake Improvement Agency Big Bear Lake Project Abandoned
Fontana Redevelopment Agency Sierra Corridor Commercial Project Area Adopted 6/92 .~
SWlP Amendment No.5 Project Area Adopted 6/92
County of San Bernardino Norton A.F.B. Redevelopment Project Adopted 7/90
(Inland Valley Development Agency)
City of San Bernardino 40th Street Redevelopment Project Scheduled 5/99
Victorville Redevelopment Agency Seventh and "0" Street Amendments Abandoned 7/89
Bear Valley Redevelopment Amendment Adopted 11/92
Victor Valley Economic Development George A.F.B. Redevelopment Project Adopted 12/93
Authority 1998 Redevelopment Plan Amendment Adopted 6/9S
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency
Town Centre 11 Project Area Amendment
Southwest City Project Area
Southwest City Project Area Amendment
Bayfront Plan Amendment
Town Centre I Plan Amendment
Coronado Community Development Agency Community Development Plan
Community Development Plan Amendment
Adopted 7/88
Adopted 11/90
Adopted 5191
Adopted 6/98
Adopted 6/98
Adopted 11/85'
Adopted 6/91
.....""
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC.
SEPTEMBER 2, 1999
-16-
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAl FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES
~7 11 2/
,~. EI Cajon Redevelopment Agency Project Area Amendment Adopted 7/87
City of Encinitas Project Area Adoption Abandoned 9/91
Lemon Grove Community Project Area Adoption Adopted 11/86
Development Agency
National City Community Development Downtown Project Area Amendment Adopted 7/95
Commission
Poway Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Plan Amendment Adopted 6/93
City of San Diego Redevelopment Agency SDSU Project Area Adoption Adopted 11/93
North Park Blight Study Completed 1994
County of San Diego Upper San Diego River Improvement Project Adopted 7189
San Marcos Redevelopment Agency Project Area No. 1 Adoption - Adopted 7/83
Project Area NO.2 Adoption Adopted 7/85
Project Area No. 3 Adoption Adopted 7/89
Project Area No. 1 Amendment Adopted 7/93
Solana Beach Redevelopment Agency Project Area Adoption Adopted 7/90
Vista Redevelopment Agency Project Area Adoption Adopted 7/87
,,r--
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
City of Santa Barbara Redevelopment
Agency
Eminent Domain Amendment
Redevelopment Plan Amendment
Scheduled for 12/98
Scheduled for 6/99
County of Santa Barbara
Redevelopment Agency
Isla Vista Redevelopment Project
Adopted 11/90
VENTURA COUNTY
County of Ventura Redevelopment Agency
Piru Earthquake Recovel)' Project
Adopted 7/95
Camarillo Redevelopment Agency
Camarillo Redevelopment Project Area
Adopted 6/96
Port Hueneme Redevelopment Agency
NCEL (Milital)' Base Reuse)
Redevelopment Project Area
Adopted 11/97
Central Community Redevelopment
Project Amendment
Adopted 1998
San Buenaventura Redevelopment Agency Midtown Corridor Project
Scheduled for 12/98
ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP. INC.
SEPTEMBER 2. 1999
-17 -
CITY OF DUBLIN
PROPOSAL FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY SERVICES