Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Reso 57-20 Approving An Addendum To A Mitigated Negative Declaration And Approving An Update To The Fallon Sports Park Master Plan
Reso No. 57-20, Item 4.7, Adopted 06/16/20 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 57 - 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * * * APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING AN UPDATE TO THE FALLON SPORTS PARK MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, the project site is located in the eastern portion of the City of Dublin, for which the City adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan to provide a planning framework for land uses, including recreational facilities and community parks. In connection with this approval, the City of Dublin certified a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15168 (SCH: 91103064, Resolution 51-93, and Addendum dated August 22, 1994; and WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared to analyze the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan in 2005. The 2005 Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved by City Council Resolution No. 89-05 on June 7, 2005; and WHEREAS, on January 8, 2019, the City Council directed Staff to update the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan to include batting cages and a cricket field, and to look at the cost and location of adding sand volleyball courts, in lieu of two softball fields; and WHEREAS, on December 17, 2019 the City Council approved the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 Concept Plan to include four sand volleyball courts and to eliminate the group picnic area and stairway access, and the City Council directed Staff to complete an environmental review in order to consider the inclusion of lighting for the batting cages; and WHEREAS, Staff prepared an initial study checklist pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, subdivision (a), to evaluate whether the proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would result in any new impacts or impacts that would be more severe than were evaluated and disclosed in the 2005 Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, subdivision (a) provides that the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or MND if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or MND have occurred (CEQA Guidelines § 15164, subdivision (a)); and WHEREAS, the analysis provided in the initial study checklist confirms that the proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not result in any new impacts or impacts that would be more severe than were evaluated and disclosed in the 2005 Mitigated Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the Addendum, checklist, and attached documents constitute substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that preparation of a subsequent MND is not required prior to construction of Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 by responsible and trustee agencies and provides the required documentation under CEQA. Reso No. 57-20, Item 4.7, Adopted 06/16/20 Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby accept and approve the Addendum attached as Exhibit A as substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration is not required and provides the required documentation under CEQA. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve an update to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan attached as Exhibit B. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of June 2020, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Goel, Hernandez, Josey, Kumagai and Mayor Haubert NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ City Clerk Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 (Upper Terrace) Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND May 28, 2020 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Background 2 Project Description 3 Environmental Checklist 6 Explanation of Environmental Checklist Responses 8 Appendices A Photometric Plan List of Figures Figure 1: Regional Location .......................................................................................................... 53 Figure 2: Project Location ............................................................................................................ 54 Figure 3: Phase 3 – Concept Plan .................................................................................................. 55 Note: All figures are included at the end of the document. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 1 Fallon Park Phase 3 (Upper Terrace) Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND Introduction This Addendum, checklist, and attached supporting documents have been prepared to determine whether and to what extent the 2005 Fallon Sports Park Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)/Initial Study (2005 MND) prepared by the City of Dublin remains sufficient to address potential impacts of the proposed new cricket field, batting cages, sand volleyball courts, and walkway, or whether additional documentation is required under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC], § 21000, et seq.). For the purposes of this Addendum, Phase 3 (also known as the Upper Terrace) of the Fallon Sports Park (Park) is the proposed project and project site. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166, and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, subdivision (a), the attached checklist has been prepared to evaluate the proposed project. The attached checklist uses the standard environmental checklist categories provided in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, subdivision (a) provides that the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or MND if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR or MND have occurred (CEQA Guidelines § 15164, subd. (a)). This Addendum, checklist, and attached documents constitute substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that preparation of a subsequent MND is not required prior to approval of the above-referenced permits by responsible and trustee agencies and provides the required documentation under CEQA. This Addendum addresses improvements and construction of the remaining 12.83 acres of Phase 3 of the Fallon Sports Park. Proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan include the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of the originally proposed softball diamonds in the Upper Terrace area. All other existing and proposed components of the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would remain unchanged. Project Title Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 (Upper Terrace) Lead Agency Name and Address City of Dublin Community Development Department 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 2 Contact Person and Phone Number Rosemary Alex Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator Phone: 925/833-6630 rosemary.alex@dublin.ca.gov Background Project Location and Context The project site is in the City of Dublin, Alameda County, California (APN: 985-54-2) (Figure 1: Regional Location). The 60.58-acre Fallon Sports Park is located at the northwest corner of Fallon Road and Central Parkway in Eastern Dublin and currently consists of a variety of athletic fields, courts, and activity areas accommodating baseball, softball, soccer, tennis, basketball, and bocce ball, a jogging/walking loop, BMX course, and parking areas (Figure 2: Project Location). The Fallon Sports Park area has been graded to create a lower and upper terrace. Drainage improvements, entry roads, parking lots, and utilities have already been installed. This existing development covers 47.75 acres and was completed in two phases. Phase I developed 28 acres that opened in 2010, and included two Little League baseball diamonds, two lighted softball diamonds, four lighted basketball courts, two lighted soccer fields, four lighted tennis courts, a restroom/field office structure, two restroom/concession structures, a parking lot, picnic areas, and vehicle and pedestrian entryways. Phase II (also known as the Lower Terrace Phase) developed 19.75 acres that opened in 2018, and included a lighted baseball diamond, four lighted bocce ball courts, two lighted, turf soccer fields, a playground, parking lot, group picnic areas, and a vehicle entryway. The original Fallon Sports Park Master Plan for the entire 60.58 acres was approved by the City in June 2005. A Master Plan Update for Phase II was adopted in February 2012 which deleted the original proposed sand volleyball courts, added a lighted baseball diamond as well as lighting for the existing soccer field, and temporarily relocated an existing City preschool to the project site. (The preschool was never relocated to the Fallon Sports Park.) The Park is bound by single-family and medium-density residential development on all sides, in addition to a fire station and open space to the north, undeveloped parkland to the south, and a public elementary school to the west. Prior Environmental Review Documents The project has been included in two previous CEQA documents, as noted below: Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (State Clearinghouse # 1991103064). A Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment (Eastern Extended Planning Area) and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 3 (EDSP) was certified by the City Council in 1993 by Resolution No. 51-93. This document and its related Addenda collectively are referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR (EDEIR.) It evaluated the following impacts: Land Use; Population, Employment and Housing; Traffic and Circulation; Community Services and Facilities; Sewer, Water and Storm Drainage; Soils, Geology and Seismicity; Biological Resources; Visual Resources; Cultural Resources; Noise; Air Quality; and Fiscal Considerations. The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Resolution No. 53–93) for the following impacts: Cumulative loss of agriculture and open space land, cumulative traffic, extension of certain community facilities (natural gas, electric and telephone service), consumption of non - renewable natural resources, increases in energy uses through increased water treatment and disposal and through operation of the water distribution system, inducement of substantial growth and concentration of population, earthquake ground shaking, loss or degradation of botanically sensitive habitat, regional air quality, noise and alteration of visual character. The EDEIR was challenged in court and was found to be legally adequate. Fallon Sports Park Master Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration (2005 MND) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to analyze the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan in 2005. The 2005 MND was approved by City Council Resolution No. 89-05 on June 7, 2005. The 2005 MND assumed development of the Park consistent with the 2005 Fallon Sports Park Master Plan. Several mitigation measures were included in the adopted MND in the attachment to the Initial Study. Project Description The entire Fallon Sports Park is designated in the General Plan as Parks/Public Recreation, and in the Zoning Ordinance as Planned Development. The proposed project includes developing Phase 3 (Upper Terrace) of the Fallon Sports Park with the following components: • Installation of a new cricket field with three pitches • Installation of four sand volleyball courts approximately lining south end of BMX course • Installation of lighted batting cages south of proposed sand volleyball courts • Elimination of two softball diamonds originally proposed in the Master Plan, to be replaced with the new cricket field, sand volleyball courts, and batting cages The Master Plan already includes the following uses for the Upper Terrace Area. These uses would also be constructed, and were previously evaluated and approved as part of the 2005 MND: • Two Little League baseball diamonds adjacent to existing Little League diamonds City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 4 • Activity area (children’s play area and picnic plaza) between Little League diamonds and proposed new improvements • Walkway along cricket field and sand volleyball courts Figure 3: Phase 3 – Concept Plan demonstrates locations of proposed improvements. Field Lighting. The City of Dublin is proposing to install up to 20 lighting fixtures in the proposed batting cages, to be located south of Fallon Road and the existing BMX course. A photometric plan is included as Appendix A. Lights would only be used when the Park is open until 10 p.m. each night; all lights would be turned off by 10:00 p.m. New lights would be sited to minimize spillover of unwanted light and glare on adjacent residential areas. Additionally, as described in the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, all lighting would be “cut-off” style, directing light down, not out. Project Approvals The City proposes to amend the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan to accommodate the proposed revisions to Phase 3 Park improvements, as described in this Addendum. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 5 Lead Agency City of Dublin Community Development Department 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Contact Person and Phone Number Rosemary Alex Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator Phone: 925/833-6630 rosemary.alex@dublin.ca.gov Project Location Fallon Sports Park, northwest corner of Fallon Road and Central Parkway in Eastern Dublin Project Sponsor City of Dublin General Plan Designation Parks/Public Recreation Zoning Planned Development Project Approvals The City proposes to amend the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan to accommodate the proposed project. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 6 Environmental Checklist The purpose of the checklist is to evaluate the categories in terms of any changed condition (i.e., changed circumstances, Project changes, or new information of substantial importance) that may result in an adverse change in the environmental result (e.g., a new significant impact or substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant effect) (CEQA Guidelines § 15162). The questions posed in the checklist come from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. A “no” answer does not necessarily mean that there are no potential impacts relative to the environmental category, but that there is no adverse change in the condition or status of the impact since it was analyzed and addressed with mitigation measures in the 2005 MND. These environmental categories might be answered with a “no” in the checklist, since the proposed Project does not introduce adverse changes that would result in a modification to the conclusion of the previously approved CEQA document. This addendum addresses the conclusions of the 2005 MND. Explanation of Checklist Evaluation Categories (1) Conclusion in 2005MND and Related Documents This column summarizes the conclusion of the 2005 MND relative to the environmental issue listed under each topic. (2) Do the Proposed Changes Involve New Significant Impacts? Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subdivision (a)(1), this column indicates whether the changes represented by the revised Project will result in new significant environmental impacts not previously identified or mitigated by the 2005 MND, or whether the changes will result in a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact. (3) New Circumstances Involving New Significant Impacts? Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subdivision (a)(2), this column indicates whether there have been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the 2005 MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (4) New Information of Substantial Importance Requiring New Analysis or Verification? Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subdivision (a)(3)(A-D), this column indicates whether new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the 2005 MND was adopted, shows any of the following: City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 7 (A) The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous 2005 MND; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous 2005 MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. If the additional analysis completed as part of this environmental review were to find that the conclusions of the 2005 MND remain the same and no new significant impacts are identified, or identified impacts are not found to be substantially more severe, or additional mitigation is not necessary, then the question would be answered “no” and no additional environmental document would be required under section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. (5) Mitigation Measures Implemented or Address Impacts Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, subdivision (a)(3), this column indicates whether the IS/MND provides mitigation measures to address effects in the related impact category. Any previously adopted mitigation measures will be identified. The response will also address proposed revisions to previously adopted mitigation measures. These mitigation measures will be implemented with the construction of the Project, as applicable. If “NA” is indicated, the IS/MND has concluded that the impact either does not occur with this Project or is not significant, and therefore no additional mitigation measures are needed. Discussion and Mitigation Sections (1) Discussion A discussion of the elements of the checklist is provided under each environmental category in order to clarify the answers. The discussion provides information about the particular environmental issue, how the Project relates to the issue, and the status of any mitigation that may be required or that has already been implemented. (2) Mitigation Measures Applicable mitigation measures from the 2005 MND that apply to the Project are listed under each environmental category. (3) Conclusions A discussion of the conclusion relating to the analysis is contained in each section. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 8 Explanation of Environmental Checklist Responses Aesthetics ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Issues Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstances Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification? Mitigation Measures 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less than significant No No No None b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Less than significant No No No None c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less than significant No No No None d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than significant with mitigation No No No 2005 MND Mitigation Measure 1 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a–c) Scenic vistas and resources, visual character The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with visual quality and resources would be less than significant because the implementation of Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not significantly alter the appearance of the originally vacant site. Fallon Sports Park is not located within a scenic route, and the proposed improvements would provide street frontage landscaping that would improve the visual community landscape of the area. The proposed Phase 3 portion of the Fallon Sports Park is currently vacant and has been rough graded in connection with prior approvals and in anticipation of construction of a public park. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 9 The project would involve minor changes to the site plan proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan include the installation of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of the two softball diamonds originally proposed in Phase 3 of the Master Plan. These proposed changes to the Master Plan would retain the athletic development originally proposed and would not significantly alter the visual characteristics of the site as analyzed in the 2005 MND. Therefore, the project would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to scenic vistas, scenic resources, or visual characteristics than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with new light or glare because of nighttime park lighting in proximity to residential neighborhoods would be less than significant with mitigation. Mitigation Measure 1 required a photometric study for the Master Plan demonstrating low lighting prior to electrical permits for lighting installation. This mitigation measure applies to the proposed Phase 3 development. Daytime glare is not expected to be generated by any components of the Phase 3 development. The only proposed new lighting would be installed at the batting cages. Lighting was not originally proposed for Phase 3 development and was not analyzed in the 2005 MND. However, this lighting would be contained to a small area compared to field lighting for other parts of the Park. The lighted batting cages would be located in the interior of the park, not adjacent to neighboring residential uses. A photometric plan was prepared for the City by Associated Lighting Representatives on February 21, 2020 and is included as Appendix A of this Addendum. Proposed changes to the Master Plan include adding 20 light fixtures to the Phase 3 development area. The photometric study demonstrates that based on the location of the proposed batting cages in the interior of the Park, the lighting would dissipate sufficiently at the property line and not adversely affect any surrounding residences. Furthermore, the Park is surrounded by local roadways, which provide an additional buffer, and all lighting would be shut off at 10 p.m. Therefore, proposed changes to the Master Plan would not result in any light trespass during nighttime hours or new or more severe impacts from light and glare than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. Mitigation Measures 2005 MND MM 1 – A photometric study shall be provided with final construction drawings of the project prior to the issuance of an electrical permit for installation of any lighting. "Spill over" lighting shall be kept to a minimum to prevent disturbance and intrusion into residential areas using lower lighting, with light standards for fields and courts designed to minimize the light intrusion into residential areas. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce the impact of nighttime lighting to a level of less-than-significant. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 10 Agricultural and Forestry Resources Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstances Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Less than significant No No No None b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Less than significant No No No None c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non- agricultural use? Less than significant No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (farmland) The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact associated with the conversion of farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance. The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These minor changes would not result in any new or additional impacts in relation to agricultural resources. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impact to important farmland than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 11 (b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a William Act contract The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with existing zoning conflicts or Williamson Act contracts would be less than significant because the Fallon Sports Park contains no agricultural zoning or farmland and is zoned for use as a community park, consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan. According to the 2005 MND, no portion of the site is associated with a Williamson Act Land Conservation Agreement. The project would involve development of parkland with minor changes to the originally proposed plan that was analyzed in the 2005 MND. These minor changes would be consistent with existing zoning and would not conflict with agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. As such, the project would not result in any new or more severe impact to important farmland than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (c) Conflict with existing zoning The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with existing zoning conflicts would be less than significant because the Park is zoned for use as a community park. The project would fulfill the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan’s intended use of the land as a community park and is consistent with the existing zoning. The minor changes that are proposed would not necessitate a change of zoning or result in any new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 12 Air Quality ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Issues Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstan ces Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification? Mitigation Measures 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No impact No No No None b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less than significant with mitigation. No No No 2005 MND Mitigation Measure 2 c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less than significant No No No None d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than significant No No No None e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less than significant No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Consistent with air quality plans The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not conflict with the Clean Air Plan adopted by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. The proposed amount of nonresidential development has been included in the City of Dublin's planned growth as part of the EDEIR since 1994 and would serve the existing community. The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as analyzed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These minor changes would not alter the amount of nonresidential development as compared to the previously proposed plan, and therefore would not result in any new or additional impacts. As City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 13 such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND with respect to Clean Air Plan consistency. (b) Violate any air quality standard The 2005 MND concluded that, with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact associated with air quality standard violations. The 2005 MND required the incorporation of Mitigation Measure 2 into future phases of project construction to reduce potential air quality impacts related to construction on the 60.58 acres of park development to a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure 2 requires dust control for the project’s construction and earthwork to conform to the requirements of the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) prepared by the City and to established City standards. This mitigation measure includes additional requirements for dust control, including daily watering of all active construction areas, covering all trucks hauling soil, sand or other loose materials; daily watering or application of nontoxic soil stabilizer on all unpaved access roads, parking area and staging areas; daily sweeping of all paved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas with water sweepers; and hydroseeding or application of nontoxic soil stabilizers to construction areas that have been graded. The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These changes would involve a similar level of construction as the previously proposed plan, and therefore would not result in any new or additional impacts. The proposed project would implement Mitigation Measure 2 from the 2005 MND, updated to reflect current BAAQMD guidance. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to air quality standards violations than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (c) Cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutant The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact associated with cumulatively considerable net increases of criteria pollutants. The implementation of the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not generate significant amounts of additional traffic beyond that considered in previous environmental documents, and vehicular traffic emissions and stationary source emissions would not exceed regional air quality standards or thresholds. The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These minor changes would not increase vehicle trips associated with the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan as analyzed in the 2005 MND, and therefore would not result in any new or additional criteria pollutant impacts. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to criteria pollutants than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 14 (d–e) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations, or create objectionable odors The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have less than significant impacts associated with the exposure of sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations and the creation of objectionable odors. The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These minor changes would not result in an increase in pollutants or odors associated with the construction and operation of the project, and therefore would not result in any new or additional impacts. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to pollutants or odors than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. Mitigation Measures 2005 MND MM 2 – Dust control for the construction and earthwork for the project shall conform to the requirements of the SWPPP prepared by the City and established City standards. All active construction areas shall be watered daily and more frequently, if necessary. All trucks hauling soil, sand or other loose materials shall be covered. Water shall be applied daily, or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking area, and staging areas at construction sites. All paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites shall be swept daily with water sweepers. Hydroseed or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers to construction areas that have been graded. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 15 Biological Resources ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Issues Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special- status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than significant No No No EDEIR MM 3.7/1.0 – 5.0, 10.0, 14.0, 16.0, 17.0, and 19.0 b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than significant No No No None c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Less than significant No No No None d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less than significant No No No None e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No impact No No No None f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No impact No No No None City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 16 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Substantial adverse effect on candidate, sensitive, or special-status species The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact regarding adverse effects on candidate, sensitive, or special-status species if the mitigation measures defined in applicable CEQA documents (including the EDEIR), and all applicable environmental permits, are implemented. Mitigation measures defined in the EDEIR to reduce significant impacts on biological resources are included in IM 3.7A through S. Mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed project are listed below. The proposed project involves only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. Additionally, the proposed project site is heavily degraded following implementation of previous phases of the Fallon Sports Park. No candidate, sensitive, or special-status species or signs thereof were detected during a field survey conducted on March 12, 2020, by FCS biologist Bernhard Warzecha. Therefore, the minor changes associated with the proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special-status species than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (b) Substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact regarding adverse effects on riparian or other sensitive natural communities if the mitigation measures defined in the EDEIR are implemented. Based on the field survey conducted on March 12, 2020 by FCS biologist Bernhard Warzecha, no riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are present on the proposed project footprint covered under this Addendum. Therefore, the project would not result in any adverse effects to riparian or other sensitive natural communities and would therefore remain consistent with the conclusions of the 2005 MND. The proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (c) Substantial adverse effect on wetlands The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact regarding adverse effects on federally protected wetlands. Based on the field survey conducted on March 12, 2020 by FCS biologist Bernhard Warzecha, no aquatic features, including wetlands, are present at the proposed project site covered under this Addendum. Therefore, the project would not result in any adverse impacts to federally protected wetlands and would therefore remain consistent with conclusions and findings of the City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 17 2005 MND. The proposed project would not result in any new or more severe impact than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (d) Interfere or impede the movement of migratory fish or wildlife The 2005 MND concluded that the impacts of the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would be less than significant in relation to interference or impediments to movement of migratory fish or wildlife. The proposed project involves only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Additionally, the proposed project site is heavily degraded following implementation of previous phases of the Fallon Sports Park. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts regarding adverse effects to movement of migratory fish or wildlife than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (e) Conflict with local policies or ordinance include tree preservation The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not conflict with the EDSP, General Plan, or other adopted policies and ordinances including tree preservation, and that no heritage trees exist on-site. Approval and construction of the proposed project would not affect any protected trees on- site, since no mature trees currently exist where the cricket pitches, batting cages, or sand volleyball courts would be constructed. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts regarding conflicts with local policies or ordinance than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (f) Conflict with adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not conflict with the provision of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state Habitat Conservation Plan. The project site lies within the Eastern Alameda County Conservation Strategy (EACCS) planning area. The City of Dublin utilizes the EACCS as guidance for environmental permitting for public projects. Private development projects are encouraged to use the EACCS as a resource as well. The EACCS embodies a regional approach to permitting and mitigating wildlife habitat impacts associated with land development, infrastructure, and other activities. The EACCS is neither a Habitat Conservation Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan, but is a document intended to provide guidance during the project planning and permitting process to ensure that impacts are offset in a biologically effective manner. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or significantly more severe impacts with respect to this topic than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. Mitigation Measures City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 18 EDEIR MM 3.7/1.0 – Direct disturbance or removal of trees or native vegetation cover should be minimized and be restricted to those areas actually designated for the construction of improvements. EDEIR MM 3.7/2.0 – Vegetation enhancement/management plans should be prepared for all open space areas (whether held publicly or privately) with the intent to enhance the biologic potential of the area as wildlife habitat. The focus of such plans will be to reintroduce native species in order to increase the vegetative cover and plant diversity. EDEIR MM 3.7/3.0 – The City will require a detailed revegetation/restoration plan to be developed for all disturbed areas that are to remain undeveloped. The plan will be developed by a qualified revegetation specialist, and should incorporate stockpiling of native topsoils as appropriate, for later reapplication to cut slopes, shoulders, and pads. EDEIR MM 3.7/4.0 – Grazing management plans shall be developed by the City and implemented soon after approval of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. Management plans shall favor protection of riparian and wetland areas, increased plant diversity, and the recovery of native plants, in particular, perennial grasses. EDEIR MM 3.7/5.0 – All areas of disturbance should be revegetated as quickly as possible to prevent erosion. Native trees (preferably those species already on site), shrubs, herbs, and grasses should be used for revegetation of areas to remain as natural open space. The introduction of non-native plant species should be avoided. EDEIR MM 3.7/10.0 – Establish a stream corridor system (see Specific Plan: Figure 6.1) which provides multi-purpose open space corridors capable of accommodating wildlife and pedestrian circulation. In order to facilitate the use of these corridors by both humans and wildlife, human activities (e.g., trails) should be limited to one side of the stream. EDEIR MM 3.7/14.0 – The City should enact and enforce an erosion and sedimentation control ordinance establishing performance standards to ensure maintenance of water quality and protection of stream channels. The ordinance should regulate grading and development activities adjacent to streams and wetland areas, and require revegetation of all ground disturbance immediately after construction to reduce erosion potential. Until such an ordinance is in place, the City shall require project applicants to provide a detailed erosion and sedimentation control plan as part of the project submittal. EDEIR MM 3.7/16.0 – Existing sensitive habitats shall be avoided and protected where feasible. EDEIR MM 3.7/17.0 – Construction near drainages shall take place during the dry season. EDEIR MM 3.7/19.0 – The use of rodenticides and herbicides within the Project area should be restricted to avoid impacts on wildlife. The City shall require any poisoning programs to be done in cooperation with and under supervision of the Alameda County Department of Agriculture. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 19 Cultural Resources Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? No impact No No No MM 3.9/1.0–4.0 of the EDEIR b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? No impact No No No MM 3.9/5.0 of the EDEIR c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? No impact No No No None d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? No impact No No No MM 3.9/5.0 of the EDEIR Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Historical resources The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with historical resources because no resources were discovered on the Fallon Sports Park site in a site-specific survey. Unrecorded cultural resources that could be encountered on the site would be addressed as required by the mitigation measures contained in the EDEIR. These mitigation measures (3.9/1.0–4.0) mandate a program of mechanical and/or hand subsurface testing for the presence or absence of midden deposits, recordation of identified midden sites, collection and/or testing of resources, and development of a site-specific protection program for prehistoric sites. The Phase 3 development area has remained relatively unchanged since the implementation of Phase II and is still vacant. No new State or local historical resources have been designated on or adjacent to the site. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to historical resources than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 20 (b, d) Archaeological resources, human remains The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with archaeological resources or human remains because no resources or remains were discovered on the Fallon Sports Park site in a site-specific survey. It did, however, reference Mitigation Measure 3.9/5.0 of the EDEIR, establishing protocols for inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources found during site grading. The 2005 MND stipulated that these measures would continue to be followed during ongoing development of Fallon Sports Park, and so are incorporated in this Addendum. In addition, the cultural resource mitigation measures contained in the EDEIR would address impacts to human remains. The Phase 3 development area has remained relatively unchanged since the implementation of Phase II and is still vacant. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to archaeological resources and disturbance of human remains than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (c) Paleontological/unique geological resources The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with paleontological resources because no resources were discovered on the Fallon Sports Park site in a site-specific survey. The Phase 3 development area has remained relatively unchanged since the implementation of Phase II and is still vacant. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not result in new or more severe impacts related to paleontological resources than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. Mitigation Measures EDEIR MM 3.9/1.0 – All locations of prehistoric resources will need a program of mechanical and/or hand subsurface testing to determine the presence or absence of midden deposits associated with the surface indicators of aboriginal presence. EDEIR MM 3.9/2.0 – All locations containing either midden components or concentrations of cultural materials located on the surface will be recorded on State of California site survey forms. The borders of any midden deposits or concentrations of cultural materials (other than single isolated artifact discoveries) will be staked so that accurate location maps can be produced by professional survey teams. EDEIR MM 3.9/3.0 – If it can be demonstrated that these recorded and mapped locations will be impacted in any manner by future construction or indirectly impacted as a result of increased access to the areas, a plan of evaluative testing of each resource will have to be devised in order to prepare responsive mitigation measures. Evaluative testing will consist of the collection and analysis of any surface concentration of cultural materials, and the hand excavation and analysis of the scientific content of any midden components discovered during presence or absence testing. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 21 EDEIR MM 3.9/4.0 – The City shall retain the services of a qualified archaeologist to develop a protection program for prehistoric sites which contain either a surface or subsurface deposit of cultural materials or information which qualify under Appendix K of CEQA as "significant", and which are located in areas of the Project site where development will significantly alter the current condition of the prehistoric resource. EDEIR MM 3.9/5.0 – The discovery of historic or prehistoric remains during grading and construction will result in the cessation of such activities until the significance and extent of those remains can be ascertained by a certified archaeologist. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 22 ENERGY Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures The topic of the project's energy use was not analyzed in the EDEIR or the 2005 MND. The project’s impacts related to energy use are not required to be analyzed unless they constitute new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete (Public Resources Code section 21166 and Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). The impact of energy use was known at the time of the certification of the EDEIR and the 2005 MND. Under CEQA standards, it is not new information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or negative declaration. Therefore, no supplemental environmental analysis of the project's impacts on this issue is required under CEQA. (a–b) Wasteful consumption of energy resources, or conflict with local plans for renewable energy As discussed above, no additional environmental analysis is required under CEQA Section 21166. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 23 Geology and Soils Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Indirectly or directly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Less than significant No No No None ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less than significant No No No None iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less than significant No No No None iv) Landslides? Less than significant No No No None b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than significant No No No None c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less than significant No No No MM 3.6/14.0 through 16.0 of the EDEIR d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less than significant No No No MM 3.6/14.0 through 16.0 of the EDEIR e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No impact No No No None City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 24 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Seismic hazards The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with seismic hazards would be less than significant because recommendations from previous area and site geotechnical evaluations were incorporated into development plans for the Fallon Sports Park. The location of the Phase 3 development would not change. Additionally, the proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not change existing circumstances related to seismic hazards or result in any new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (b) Erosion/topsoil loss The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with erosion or topsoil loss would be less than significant because standard City Conditions of Approval would be followed and incorporated into construction documents, including implementation of erosion control plans and a SWPPP. These conditions would also apply to the Phase 3 development. The proposed project is located within Fallon Sports Park, which had been analyzed for erosion and topsoil loss impacts. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (c–d) Soil stability, expansion The 2005 MND concluded that impacts associated with soil stability and expansive soils would be less than significant because Mitigation Measures 3.6/14.0 through 16.0 of the EDEIR were adopted to reduce shrink-swell potential. These mitigation measures require appropriate structural foundations, support for court and parking areas, and other methods to mediate impacts. These mitigation measures would be carried forward as applicable. The proposed project is located within Fallon Sports Park, which had been analyzed for unstable or expansive soil impacts. The proposed minor changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not result in any new or more severe impacts related to unstable or expansive soils than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (e) Soil capability to support alternative wastewater disposal The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with supporting alternative wastewater disposal because the restroom facilities at Fallon Sports Park would be connected to the public sewer system. Restroom facilities are not part of the proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, nor were they included in the originally proposed Phase 3 development. As such there would be no new or more severe impacts related to soil capability to support alternative wastewater disposal than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. Mitigation Measures City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 25 EDEIR MM 3.6/14.0 – The potential impact of expansive soils and rock with respect to Project improvements can be significantly reduced, or in many cases prevented by the recognition and characterization of site-specific conditions, and the formulation of appropriate design criteria and mitigation measures during detailed design-level geotechnical investigation, conducted for each specific proposed project. EDEIR MM 3.6/15.0 – The potential for shrink and swell of expansive soils and rock can be reduced by controlling moisture and by treatment through measures listed below. Subsurface drainage alone is not generally effective against the effects of regional wet/drought cycles. Required measures for a specific project should be based on the recommendation of the project geotechnical consultant and approved by the City and include: • Moisture conditioning prior to construction; • Construction of surface and subsurface drainage to control infiltration after construction; • Lime treatment, which can be used to produce non-expansive fill; and EDEIR MM 3.6/16.0 – The potential effects of expansive soil and rock can be reduced by appropriate foundation and pavement design, including those design elements listed below. Adjustable foundation systems are not generally effective against the effects of regional wet/drought cycles and are considered undesirable because the systems require periodic maintenance, and their use should be discouraged. Appropriate design criteria should be developed by the project geotechnical consultant and approved by the City. • Founding structural foundations below the zone of seasonal moisture change; • Use of structurally supported floors; and • Removal and replacement with non-expansive fill beneath structure slabs and asphaltic concrete. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 26 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures Since the EDEIR and the 2005 MND were approved before greenhouse gas (GHG) emission analysis became a CEQA requirement in 2006, the determination of whether GHG emissions and climate change need to be analyzed for this proposed project is governed by the law on supplemental or subsequent EIRs (Public Resources Code section 21166 and Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). The topic of the project's contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions was not analyzed in the EDEIR or the 2005 MND. However, these impacts are not required to be analyzed unless they constitute new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete (Public Resources Code section 21166 and Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). The impact of GHG emissions was known at the time of the certification of the EDEIR and the 2005 MND. Under CEQA standards, it is not considered new information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or negative declaration. Therefore, no supplemental environmental analysis of the project's impacts on this issue is required under CEQA. (a–b) Generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, or conflict with GHG plans or regulations. As discussed above, no additional environmental analysis is required under CEQA Section 21166. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 27 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? No impact No No No None b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? No impact No No No None c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within ¼ mile of an existing or proposed school? No impact No No No None d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No impact No No No None e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No impact No No No None f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No impact No No No None g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No impact No No No None h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent No impact No No No None City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 28 Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a–d) Exposure to hazardous materials, upset/accident, near school, hazardous materials list, The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts associated with exposure to hazardous materials, upset/accident, hazards near schools, or hazardous sites. The 2005 MND determined that no hazardous material has been transported to or from the site or is anticipated to be done in the future, as the site was planned to be developed into a public park. The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts. The proposed project involves only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These proposed changes would not involve additional exposure to hazardous materials, or any other risks associated with upset or accident or exposure of hazards near schools. The proposed project would not be located on a hazardous materials site. Although Kolb Elementary School is located 500 feet west of the Park, given the nature of the proposed project, there would be no risk of exposure of hazardous materials to the school. There are no hazardous sites or other areas of concern listed on the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor database.1 The nearest site of concern listed on EnviroStor is a former cleanup program site located about 500 feet east of the Fallon Sports Park at the Jordan Ranch at 4233 Fallon Street. The case was resolved and closed in January 2016. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with hazards or hazardous materials than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (e–f) Proximity to a public or private airport The 2005 MND concluded that the site is not located within an airport land use plan or within the vicinity of a public airport. According to the 2005 MND, the Livermore Municipal Airport and the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) confirmed that the Area F Planning Area in 1 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2020. EnviroStor. Website: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=4605+Lockhart+St%2C+Dublin%2C+CA+94568. Accessed March 19, 2020. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 29 Eastern Dublin was outside the referral area for the airport, and the ALUC has no jurisdiction over the land uses. The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not change the circumstances regarding proximity to public or private airports or regarding airport planning areas. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with hazards or hazardous materials than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (g) Impair implementation of an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with emergency evacuation plans. According to the 2005 MND, the site’s driveways with entry features from Lockhart Street and Central Parkway provide adequate emergency access, and the emergency access as shown on the Master Plan was approved by the Alameda County Fire Department. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not involve any changes to emergency access, or to an emergency response plan, or to an emergency evacuation plan. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (h) Expose people or structures to wildland fires The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts due to exposure of people or structures to the risk of wildland fires. According to the 2005 MND, improvements to the Park as well as urbanization in the surrounding areas would minimize the risks of wildfires in the project area. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not create any new risk of wildland fires or any increased exposure to such risks. The site is located within a State Responsibility Area and is currently located outside of the fire hazard severity zones as indicated on the applicable Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map provided by CalFire.2 As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with wildland fires than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. 2 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2020. Fire Hazard Severity Zones Maps: Alameda County. Website: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/wildfire-planning-engineering/wildland-hazards-building-codes/fire- hazard-severity-zones-maps/. Accessed March 19, 2020. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 30 Hydrology and Water Quality Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less than significant No No No No b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local ground water table level (for example, the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less than significant No No No No c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Less than significant No No No EDEIR MM 3.5/49.0, 51.0, and 52.0 d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site. Less than significant No No No EDEIR MM 3.5/49.0, 51.0, and 52.0 e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less than significant No No No EDEIR MM 3.5/49.0, 51.0, and 52.0 f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less than significant No No No EDEIR MM 3.5/49.0, 51.0, and 52.0 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood-hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Less than significant No No No No City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 31 Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood-hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Less than significant No No No None i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less than significant No No No None j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Less than significant No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Violate water quality or waste discharge requirements The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact regarding violations of water quality or waste discharge requirements. The proposed project involves only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These proposed changes would not violate water quality or waste discharge requirements. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with water quality or waste discharge requirements than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (b) Substantially deplete or interfere with groundwater supplies The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact regarding groundwater supplies. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not involve any additional demand to groundwater supplies. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with groundwater supplies than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 32 (c–f) Substantially alter existing drainage patterns re: erosion/siltation, re: flooding, or degrade water quality The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact regarding drainage patterns and water quality. According to the 2005 MND, an intermittent creek flows along the western boundary of the site. According to the 2005 MND, the project utilized a United States Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 wetland fill permit, a U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Opinion, a Regional Water Quality Control Board Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and a California Department of Fish and Game 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, and all other required permits from the appropriate State and federal agencies. The 2005 MND stated that the Park’s existing drainage patterns would be changed as a result of grading and contouring of the land. The 2005 MND noted that the creek would be improved and enhanced, and swales would be constructed to filter and absorb stormwater and runoff at the site. Mitigation measures requiring drainage and runoff control and the use of biodegradable pesticides and herbicide to reduce pollution were implemented. These include the following mitigation measures from the EDEIR: 3.5/49.0, 51.0, and 52.0. The 2005 MND determined that these mitigation measures would reduce impacts to water quality and drainage to a less than significant impact. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. The project would be required to implement the applicable mitigation measures identified above. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with the alteration of drainage patterns, erosion, siltation, or degradation of water supply than were previously analyzed and mitigated in the 2005 MND. (e) Runoff exceed drainage capacity, or add pollution The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact regarding runoff, drainage capacity, and pollution. According to the 2005 MND, the grading plan that was prepared for the project conformed to the Alameda Flood Control and Water Quality District, Zone 7 requirements. The grading plan also met the water quality standards of the City of Dublin’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and the Alameda County Urban Runoff Clean Water Program. The City of Dublin’s Conditions of Approval included erosion control plans and preparation of a SWPPP. The City Public Works Department’s hydrology and drainage studies determined that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the project’s stormwater and drainage facilities. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Existing drainage patterns may be slightly modified to accommodate the changes; however, the changes would not be significant. The project would be required to implement the mitigation measures as outlined above, which would reduce any changes to drainage patterns to a less than significant impact. The proposed changes would not cause additional City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 33 pollution beyond what was analyzed in the 2005 MND. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with runoff than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (f) Water Quality The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact on water quality. As discussed in Impact Question 9 (c–e), the project has complied with all requirements related to water quality and has implemented mitigation measures that were determined to reduce the project’s impacts on water quality to less than significant. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not include changes that would impact water quality beyond what was analyzed in the 2005 MND. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts to water quality than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (g–h) Flood hazard The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact regarding flood hazards. According to the 2005 MND, the area is not located within a 100-year flood zone as identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).3 The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not involve any additional flood hazards beyond what was analyzed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not alter the location of the site, which is currently designated an Area of Minimal Flood Hazard on the most recent FEMA flood maps. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to flood hazards than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact regarding seiche, tsunami, or mudflows. According to the 2005 MND and discussed in the previous impact question, the site is not located within a 100-year flood zone as identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map published by FEMA. Additionally, the project site is not located near major bodies of water and is therefore not at risk of tsunami or seiche. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND, which would not include any changes to the site’s location or boundaries. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts associated with seiche, tsunamis, or mudflows than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. 3 Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2009. Flood Map Number 06001C0328G. August 3. Website: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?#searchresultsanchor. Accessed March 19, 2020. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 34 Mitigation Measures EDEIR MM 3.5/49.0 – Plan facilities and select management practices in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area that protect and enhance water quality. EDEIR MM 3.5/51.0 – Water Quality Investigation. Require a specific water quality investigation be submitted with each development application to demonstrate existing water quality and impacts that urban runoff would have. The water quality investigation should address the quantity of runoff and the effects from discharged pollutants from surface runoff into creeks and detention facilities. EDEIR MM 3.5/52.0 – Develop community-based programs to educate local residents and businesses on methods to reduce non-point sources of pollution. Coordinate such programs with current Alameda County programs. Such programs should include: • Increased availability of liquid recycling centers (i.e.: oil, greases, etc.), to reduce potential/or dumping into storm drains. • Programs that educate the public that catch basins and storm drains flow to creeks, to potable groundwater basins, and to the San Francisco Bay, including a potential program to paint labels at each catch basin and storm drain to alert people to these facts. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 35 Land Use and Planning Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? No impact No No No None b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? No impact No No No None c) Conflict with any applicable Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan? No impact No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Physically divide an established community The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts related to the physical division of an established community. As discussed in the 2005 MND, the project does not divide an established community because the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan designated the site to provide recreational facilities to new and existing developments in Eastern Dublin for use by residents and the surrounding community. The Master Plan is consistent with the EDSP and General Plan. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not alter the location or boundaries of the Park. Therefore, the impacts of the proposed changes are consistent with the 2005 MND. The site would not physically divide an established community. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (b) Conflict with general plan The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts associated with conflicts with applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations. The Master Plan is consistent with the EDSP/General Plan EIR. These plans designate the Master Plan area City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 36 as City Park and Park. Additionally, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan is consistent with the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. The proposed changes would not cause any inconsistencies with the EDSP, the General Plan, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan, or any other land use or zoning designations. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts related to conflicts with a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan. According to the 2005 MND, there are no applicable Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans for the project area. The proposed changes would occur within the Fallon Sports Park and would not be inconsistent with any applicable Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 37 Mineral Resources Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No impact No No No None b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No impact No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a–b) Loss of known mineral resource The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with mineral resources because State mineral resource maps do not indicate mineral resources on-site, and the EDEIR does not indicate significant mineral deposits on-site. The proposed project would involve only minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND, which would not include any changes to the site’s location or boundaries. The proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not change existing circumstances related to mineral resources or result in any new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 38 Noise Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than significant No No No MM 3.10/4.0- 5.0 b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Less than significant No No No MM 3.10/4.0- 5.0 c) Substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less than significant No No No MM 3.10/4.0- 5.0 d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less than significant No No No MM 3.10/4.0- 5.0 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No impact No No No MM 3.10/4.0- 5.0 f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No impact No No No MM 3.10/4.0- 5.0 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a–d) Exposure to or generation of noise exceeding standards, exposure to ground borne vibration or ground borne noise, permanently increasing ambient noise levels, or substantial temporary noise increase The 2005 MND concluded that with implementation of mitigation measures defined in the EDEIR and requirements in the City of Dublin’s standard conditions of approval, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have a less than significant impact associated with exposure to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards, exposure of people to ground-borne vibration, or permanent increases in ambient noise levels. These mitigation measures and City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 39 conditions of approval require preparation of a construction noise management plan to minimize noise and adherence to construction hour limitations. The project would involve minor changes to the Phase 3 development as analyzed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These minor changes would not result in any new or additional noise impacts. Implementation of these changes are expected to result in similar levels of construction, trip generation, and spectator attendance. These changes would not introduce any new noise sources not previously analyzed. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND for any impacts related to exposure to or generation of noise in excess of standards, exposure to ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise, a permanent increase in ambient noise levels, or a substantial temporary noise increase. (e–f) Excessive noise level near a public or private airport The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not expose people in the project area to excessive noise levels because the project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip. The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. However, these minor changes would not alter the location of the project, and therefore would not result in any new or additional noise impacts related to proximity to airports. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. Mitigation Measures MM 3.10/4.0 – Developers shall submit to the City a Construction Noise Management Program that identifies measures to be taken to minimize impacts on existing planning area residents. The program will include a schedule for grading and other major noise-generating activities that· will limit these activities to the shortest possible number of days. Hours of construction activities shall be limited in keeping with Dublin ordinances. The Program for construction vehicle access to the site shall minimize construction truck traffic through residential areas. If construction traffic must travel through residential areas, then a mitigation plan should be developed. The Program may include barriers, berms or restrictions on hours. MM 3.10/5.0 – In order to minimize the impact of construction noise, all operations should comply with local noise standards relating to construction activities. When construction occurs near residential areas, then it should be limited to normal daytime hours to minimize the impact. Stationary equipment should be adequately muffled and located as far away from sensitive receptors as possible. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 40 Population and Housing Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstances Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No impact No No No None b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No impact No No No None c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No impact No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Population growth The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with population growth because Fallon Sports Park was planned well in advance of actual development in the eastern area of the City to serve projected residential units and those already planned and approved. The proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not be significantly different from the originally proposed softball diamonds regarding inducing population growth or result in any new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (b–c) Housing and resident displacement The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with displacement of housing or people because the site was planned for park uses and not residential uses, and there is also no housing on-site. The proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not be significantly different from the originally proposed softball diamonds and would not result in any new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 41 Public Services Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? No impact No No No None b) Police protection? No impact No No No None c) Schools? No impact No No No None d) Parks? No impact No No No None e) Other public facilities? No impact No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a–e) Fire, police, schools, parks, and other public facilities The 2005 MND concluded that there were no impacts associated with public services because development of the Fallon Sports Park would not create a need for new services or facilities. Alameda County Fire Department and the City of Dublin Police Department had ensured that the Fallon Sports Park met the applicable safety criteria for public use. The City would provide maintenance of streets, roads, the Park itself, and other related governmental facilities. The project would involve minor changes to the Phase 3 development as analyzed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These minor changes would not increase the demand of fire, police, parks, and other public facilities. In addition, these proposed changes would not induce population growth and thus would not impact nearby schools. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to public services than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 42 Recreation Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No impact No No No None b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No impact No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Increase the use of existing recreation facilities causing deterioration The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts associated with the use of existing recreational facilities. The 2005 MND determined that the project would provide much-needed recreational facilities, which would increase recreational resources for the community and thereby have a beneficial impact on the provision of park facilities with no adverse impacts on existing recreational facilities. The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts. The project would involve minor changes to the Phase 3 development as proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These minor changes would not result in any new or additional impacts regarding the use of existing recreational facilities. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (b) Propose, require new facilities that cause physical effect The 2005 MND concluded that the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would have no impacts associated with the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. The 2005 MND determined that a standard requirement of 2.5 acres of community parkland is needed per 1,000 residents and that the area needed approximately 10 acres to meet this standard. The Fallon Sports Park would add 60 acres, leading to beneficial impacts associated with parks and recreational facilities. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 43 The proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are minor, and the total acreage of parkland would not change pursuant to the proposed changes. The project would fulfill the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan’s intended use of the land as a community park. The proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan would not result in any new or additional impacts regarding construction of new recreational facilities. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 44 Transportation/Traffic Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadways, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less than significant No No No None b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Not analyzed No No No None c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less than significant No No No None d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Less than significant No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Conflict with applicable transportation plans standards, including bicycle and pedestrian facilities The 2005 MND concluded the Fallon Sports Park would have less than significant impacts regarding traffic. Several new traffic improvements and extensions of roadways were underway at the time of the 2005 MND preparation and would provide adequate transportation facilities and transit modes with sufficient capacity for the planned Fallon Sports Park. A traffic study was prepared for the 2005 MND to analyze the two intersections on Lockhart Street, one at the main entrance to the Park and the second across from the pedestrian bridge. Impacts related to transportation were anticipated to be less than significant with the construction of a driveway leading to the Lower Terrace area of the Park. A driveway was since constructed from Central Parkway into the Lower Terrace, which satisfied the 2005 MND mitigation measure. No impacts related to parking and pedestrian circulation were expected. Future traffic as part of the Phase 3 development was analyzed in the 2005 MND. The proposed project is generally consistent with the original Phase 3 development, with minor changes such as constructing cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. Traffic as analyzed in the 2005 MND is not anticipated to change as a result of the proposed changes. The proposed project also would not change parking or pedestrian City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 45 circulation. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in new or more severe impacts related to transportation plans, ordinances, or policies than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (b) Conflict with CEQA Section 15064.3 (b) The topic of the project's contribution to vehicle miles travelled (VMT) was not analyzed in the EDEIR or 2005 MND. This impact is not required to be analyzed unless it constitutes new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete (Public Resources Code section 21166 and Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). The impact of increased traffic was analyzed using other methods at the time of certification of the EDEIR and 2005 MND. Under CEQA standards, it is not considered new information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or negative declaration. Therefore, no supplemental environmental analysis of the project's impacts on this issue is required under CEQA. (c) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature The 2005 MND concluded that there were less than significant impacts associated with design hazards with the implementation of the independent roadway improvements that would be completed prior to the completion of Phase I of the Fallon Sports Park. In addition, a driveway was constructed from Central Parkway into the Lower Terrace, which satisfied the 2005 MND mitigation measure. No changes to vehicular access are proposed as part of the changes to the Master Plan. As such there would be no new or more severe impacts related to design hazards than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (d) Result in inadequate emergency access The 2005 MND concluded that there were less than significant impacts associated with emergency access and that access roads would meet City of Dublin and Alameda County Fire Department design standards. Vehicular access to the Phase 3 development area is currently provided via one driveway on Lockhart Street connecting to a parking lot and providing emergency access. The driveway and parking lot were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. No changes to vehicular access are proposed as part of the changes to the Master Plan, nor were they included in the originally proposed Phase 3 development. As such, the proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not impact existing emergency access or result in any new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 46 Tribal Cultural Resources Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a, b) Listing in a Register of Historical Resources, or significant according to National Register of Historic Places criteria The topic of the Master Plan’s potential impacts to tribal cultural resources was not specifically analyzed in the EDEIR or the 2005 MND. However, the EDEIR and the 2005 MND analyzed prehistoric and historic resources and included mitigation measures related to historical and archaeological resources and human remains. These measures are listed in the cultural resources section of this Addendum. Additionally, Assembly Bill 52 does not require tribal consultation for Addendums. Therefore, the proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not create significant impacts to tribal cultural resources. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 47 Utilities and Service Systems Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? No impact No No No None b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction or which could cause significant environmental effects? No impact No No No None c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (V.4) No impact No No No None d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? No impact No No No None e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? No impact No No No None f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? No impact No No No None g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No impact No No No None City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 48 Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Wastewater treatment requirements The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with wastewater treatment requirements. The 2005 MND determined that the project would not increase the need for additional wastewater services because the project was taken into consideration in the EDEIR. The project would involve minor changes to the site plan as proposed in the 2005 MND. Specifically, proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan are the substitution of cricket pitches, batting cages, and sand volleyball courts in place of softball diamonds. These minor changes would not result in any new or additional impacts regarding wastewater treatment requirements. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (b) Require construction of new facilities The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with the construction of new facilities. The 2005 MND determined that the project was taken into consideration when the water and wastewater facilities were planned for the Eastern Dublin area and were included in the EDEIR. The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not require the construction of new facilities. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (c) Stormwater drainage The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with stormwater drainage. As discussed in the response to Impact Question 9(e), the grading plan that was prepared for the project conformed to the Alameda Flood Control and Water Quality District, Zone 7 requirements. The grading plan also met the water quality standards of the City of Dublin’s NPDES Permit and the Alameda County Urban Runoff Clean Water Program. The City of Dublin’s Conditions of Approval included erosion control plans and preparation of a SWPPP. The City Public Works Department’s hydrology and drainage studies determined that there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the project’s stormwater and drainage facilities. The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not alter the stormwater drainage for the site or require new facilities. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (d) Sufficient water supply The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with water supply. According to the 2005 MND, the construction of the proposed recreational facilities would not increase the need for additional water services. The project was considered when the water facilities were planned for the Eastern Dublin area and were analyzed in the EDEIR. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 49 The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not increase the demand for water supply or require new facilities. As such, the project would not result in a new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (e) Sufficient wastewater capacity The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with wastewater capacity. According to the 2005 MND, the construction of the proposed recreational facilities would not increase the need for wastewater services. The project was considered when the wastewater facilities were planned for the Eastern Dublin area and were analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan EIR. The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not increase the demand for wastewater services or require new facilities. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. (f–g) Adequate landfill and compliance The 2005 MND concluded that there would be no impacts associated with solid waste. According to the 2005 MND, the project would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs. The minor changes to the plan as proposed in the 2005 MND would not increase the demand for solid waste disposal services or require greater capacity or new facilities. As such, the project would not result in new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2005 MND. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 50 Wildfire Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a–d) Impair an emergency response plan, exposure to wildfire, require installation or maintenance of infrastructure, exposure to flooding or landslides The EDEIR and the 2005 MND were certified prior to the mandatory analysis of wildfire impacts. However, wildfire risks were adequately discussed in impact question 8(h). The proposed minor changes to the Master Plan would not create significant impacts related to wildfire. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 51 Mandatory Findings of Significance Environmental Issue Area Conclusion in IS/MND Do the Proposed Changes Involve New or More Severe Impacts? New Circumstanc es Involving New or More Severe Impacts? New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification ? Mitigation Measures 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Does the project: a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than significant with mitigation No No No EDEIR MM 3.7/1.0 – 5.0, 10.0, 14.0, 16.0, 17.0, and 19.0, EDEIR MM 3.9/1.0– 4.0 b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of the past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Less than significant with mitigation No No No 2005 MND MM 1 and 2 c) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No impact No No No None Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures (a) Have the potential to degrade the quality of environment Potential impacts related to biological resources, including a reduction of fish or wildlife habitat, elimination of a plant or animal community, or elimination of an important example of major periods of California history or prehistory, were analyzed in the EDEIR and the 2005 MND. The proposed project would represent a similar development type that was previously analyzed. No new or more significant impacts are anticipated than previously analyzed. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 52 (b) Individually limited but cumulatively considerable impacts Although incremental increases in certain areas can be expected as a result of construction, including air emissions and light and glare, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan is within an area with an approved specific plan that permits urbanized development and community facilities. Mitigation measures discussed in the 2005 MND and this Addendum would reduce any residual impacts on the surrounding community to less than significant levels. (c) Substantial adverse effects of human beings As detailed in this Addendum and in the 2005 MND, impacts to the environment and human beings are considered less than significant, and the proposed changes would not create new or more severe environmental impacts. City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park Phase 3 Addendum to the 2005 Fallon Sports Park MND | Page 52 (b) Individually limited but cumulatively considerable impacts Although incremental increases in certain areas can be expected as a result of construction, including air emissions and light and glare, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan is within an area with an approved specific plan that permits urbanized development and community facilities. Mitigation measures discussed in the 2005 MND and this Addendum would reduce any residual impacts on the surrounding community to less than significant levels. (c) Substantial adverse effects of human beings As detailed in this Addendum and in the 2005 MND, impacts to the environment and human beings are considered less than significant, and the proposed changes would not create new or more severe environmental impacts. ! ·|}þ4 ·|}þ4 Alameda County Santa Clara County C o n tra C o s ta C o u n ty A la m e d a C o u n ty !"#$580 ·|}þ92 ·|}þ84 !"#$680 !"#$880 ·|}þ24 !"#$680 ·|}þ237 (/101 !"#$280 ·|}þ238 Mount DiabloState Park Brentwood Ala m e d a C o u nty S a n M ate o C o u nty Pittsburg Martinez Antioch Oakley PleasantHill WalnutCreekLafayette Orinda Moraga Danville SanRamon DublinCastroValleySanLeandro LivermoreSanLorenzoPleasanton Hayward UnionCity FremontNewarkRedwoodCity MenloPark NorthFairOaks EastPaloAlto Milpitas Stanford MountainViewPaloAlto Sunnyvale EastFoothills San Joa quinRiverCarquinez S t ra i t Sherm anLake Bi g Bre a k Br io n esReservoi r Up p er S a nLeandroReservoir Lak e C habot Lak e D elValleSan AntonioReservoir Ca l a vera sReservoir CliftonCourtForebayLos Va q u ero sReservoir Figure 1Regional Location Map 5 0 52.5 Miles ! Text Project Site Source: Census 2000 Data, The CaSIL. I CITY OF DUBLINFALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE III (UPPER TERRACE)ADDENDUM 37660008 • 03/2020 | 1_regional.mxd Project Site 37660008 • 03/2020 | 2_project_location.mxd Figure 2Project Location Source: Bing Aerial Imagery. CITY OF DUBLINFALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE III (UPPER TERRACE)ADDENDUM I 1,000 0 1,000500 Feet Legend Project Site - Phase III Fallon Sports Park I37660008 • 02/2020 | 3_phaseIII_concept_plan.cdr Figure 3 Phase III - Concept Plan CITY OF DUBLIN FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE III (UPPER TERRACE) ADDENDUM Source: BFS Landscape Architects, 5/29/2020. PATHWAY ACRICKET BATTING CAGE_WorkplanePATHWAY BPATHWAY BPATHWAY APATHWAY APATHWAY AMATCHLINEXAXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXAXA1XA1XA1XA1XA1XA1XAXAXA0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.010.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.010.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.010.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.02 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.01 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.01 0.02 0.03 0.09 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.08 0.15 0.22 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.14 0.11 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.03 0.03 0.030.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.14 0.27 0.35 0.36 0.32 0.26 0.20 0.14 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.030.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.24 0.40 0.49 0.49 0.43 0.35 0.26 0.16 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.030.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.22 0.41 0.61 0.69 0.66 0.55 0.43 0.30 0.18 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.030.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.15 0.38 0.67 0.90 0.97 0.87 0.70 0.52 0.34 0.21 0.15 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.030.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.09 0.28 0.60 1.00 1.28 1.33 1.15 0.88 0.60 0.36 0.26 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.33 0.36 0.36 0.33 0.29 0.26 0.22 0.17 0.12 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.22 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.38 0.35 0.31 0.28 0.24 0.18 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.17 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.030.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.15 0.45 0.89 1.42 1.73 1.74 1.46 1.06 0.68 0.44 0.31 0.26 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.22 0.30 0.39 0.46 0.54 0.60 0.60 0.53 0.45 0.38 0.29 0.21 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.29 0.38 0.46 0.55 0.62 0.64 0.58 0.49 0.41 0.32 0.23 0.16 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.11 0.16 0.21 0.26 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.11 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.030.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.29 0.67 1.29 1.92 2.29 2.21 1.78 1.23 0.76 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.34 0.30 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.24 0.28 0.42 0.55 0.70 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.82 0.69 0.54 0.40 0.27 0.24 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.15 0.19 0.24 0.29 0.39 0.55 0.71 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.90 0.75 0.59 0.45 0.29 0.25 0.18 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.18 0.27 0.34 0.40 0.41 0.40 0.36 0.31 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.06 0.04 0.040.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.16 0.48 1.00 1.80 2.52 2.93 2.77 2.13 1.36 0.80 0.56 0.52 0.54 0.54 0.51 0.48 0.43 0.41 0.48 0.67 0.90 1.10 1.32 1.57 1.72 1.72 1.53 1.31 1.08 0.87 0.64 0.47 0.40 0.35 0.34 0.36 0.42 0.51 0.66 0.93 1.18 1.42 1.65 1.85 1.89 1.73 1.48 1.25 1.01 0.74 0.52 0.39 0.29 0.22 0.17 0.14 0.15 0.19 0.30 0.42 0.50 0.57 0.58 0.56 0.50 0.43 0.35 0.28 0.20 0.13 0.07 0.05 0.040.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.28 0.73 1.41 2.42 3.22 3.70 3.43 2.53 1.46 0.84 0.67 0.69 0.75 0.79 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.86 1.05 1.36 1.78 2.27 2.67 3.03 3.28 3.28 2.99 2.62 2.22 1.74 1.33 1.02 0.79 0.65 0.60 0.65 0.79 1.02 1.36 1.78 2.27 2.69 3.07 3.38 3.40 3.19 2.81 2.42 1.92 1.46 1.06 0.76 0.53 0.38 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.39 0.52 0.64 0.73 0.79 0.79 0.76 0.67 0.58 0.49 0.37 0.26 0.15 0.08 0.05 0.040.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.16 0.51 1.05 1.99 3.19 4.144.754.29 2.82 1.46 0.88 0.85 0.93 1.02 1.10 1.12 1.15 1.20 1.31 1.48 1.80 2.29 2.89 3.40 3.81 3.98 3.98 3.77 3.35 2.83 2.24 1.76 1.41 1.16 0.98 0.92 0.98 1.15 1.39 1.73 2.19 2.78 3.34 3.75 4.01 4.00 3.88 3.47 2.98 2.35 1.81 1.39 1.05 0.77 0.56 0.43 0.40 0.47 0.62 0.77 0.90 0.98 1.04 1.05 1.02 0.90 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.16 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.050.01 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.28 0.74 1.51 2.65 4.125.456.08 5.01 2.83 1.38 1.02 1.07 1.22 1.34 1.40 1.46 1.53 1.63 1.73 1.78 1.95 2.31 2.93 3.41 3.82 3.93 3.93 3.77 3.37 2.87 2.28 1.87 1.61 1.42 1.25 1.17 1.24 1.41 1.60 1.84 2.22 2.77 3.31 3.69 3.89 3.89 3.81 3.42 2.97 2.34 1.87 1.53 1.25 0.96 0.71 0.59 0.62 0.74 0.89 1.05 1.15 1.23 1.30 1.39 1.34 1.17 0.97 0.77 0.56 0.35 0.18 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.050.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.17 0.50 1.05 2.02 3.41 5.08 6.71 7.15 5.28 2.52 1.28 1.18 1.29 1.51 1.67 1.68 1.74 1.84 1.98 2.09 2.15 2.10 2.24 2.61 3.06 3.34 3.44 3.43 3.31 3.01 2.56 2.15 1.93 1.80 1.60 1.39 1.30 1.38 1.58 1.78 1.90 2.09 2.47 2.91 3.23 3.35 3.37 3.28 3.03 2.59 2.16 1.83 1.67 1.39 1.07 0.84 0.76 0.85 1.03 1.18 1.35 1.44 1.49 1.58 1.74 1.65 1.44 1.17 0.92 0.65 0.41 0.20 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.060.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.10 0.30 0.73 1.44 2.56 3.95 5.65 7.28 7.024.471.92 1.30 1.29 1.46 1.71 1.96 1.94 2.01 2.12 2.26 2.32 2.22 2.10 2.09 2.26 2.49 2.64 2.69 2.69 2.63 2.45 2.17 1.91 1.71 1.64 1.56 1.40 1.32 1.38 1.53 1.61 1.68 1.85 2.10 2.36 2.54 2.60 2.61 2.57 2.43 2.16 1.87 1.63 1.46 1.33 1.13 0.99 0.98 1.13 1.31 1.50 1.66 1.78 1.83 1.91 2.02 1.91 1.71 1.41 1.06 0.75 0.44 0.20 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.060.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.16 0.48 1.00 1.86 2.89 4.065.446.39 5.49 2.93 1.46 1.21 1.31 1.57 1.84 2.14 2.24 2.34 2.42 2.43 2.39 2.26 2.11 2.05 2.00 2.01 2.03 2.03 2.03 2.02 1.95 1.80 1.64 1.51 1.44 1.37 1.29 1.25 1.27 1.35 1.41 1.48 1.59 1.74 1.88 1.95 1.96 1.96 1.95 1.90 1.78 1.59 1.42 1.28 1.18 1.11 1.12 1.29 1.40 1.63 1.84 2.05 2.21 2.29 2.33 2.30 2.26 2.06 1.67 1.25 0.84 0.49 0.25 0.14 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.070.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.11 0.30 0.68 1.31 2.13 2.99 3.88 4.72 4.65 3.23 1.59 1.04 0.99 1.21 1.63 2.04 2.37 2.63 2.76 2.77 2.68 2.52 2.33 2.18 2.01 1.83 1.69 1.60 1.54 1.53 1.56 1.52 1.47 1.38 1.30 1.23 1.19 1.13 1.10 1.13 1.16 1.21 1.27 1.34 1.42 1.47 1.50 1.48 1.49 1.50 1.47 1.42 1.33 1.22 1.15 1.15 1.22 1.37 1.52 1.76 1.93 2.21 2.54 2.79 2.92 2.92 2.84 2.77 2.43 1.91 1.42 1.01 0.59 0.29 0.13 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.080.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.16 0.43 0.88 1.50 2.18 2.81 3.27 3.40 2.84 1.65 0.88 0.75 0.73 0.93 1.54 2.25 2.76 3.17 3.32 3.22 2.96 2.64 2.41 2.17 1.98 1.76 1.51 1.34 1.22 1.17 1.17 1.16 1.13 1.10 1.04 1.01 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.92 0.98 1.01 1.07 1.09 1.11 1.12 1.10 1.13 1.11 1.10 1.09 1.06 1.03 1.07 1.19 1.40 1.64 1.85 2.05 2.33 2.67 3.11 3.49 3.62 3.60 3.45 3.20 2.66 2.18 1.72 1.19 0.68 0.30 0.16 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.080.01 0.02 0.04 0.10 0.25 0.56 0.99 1.51 1.99 2.31 2.41 2.20 1.51 0.80 0.56 0.52 0.52 0.69 1.24 2.17 3.05 3.59 3.78 3.70 3.29 2.86 2.45 2.18 1.93 1.66 1.40 1.14 0.93 0.83 0.80 0.81 0.79 0.77 0.75 0.71 0.69 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.67 0.69 0.71 0.74 0.74 0.76 0.73 0.70 0.74 0.73 0.75 0.76 0.79 0.90 1.09 1.36 1.62 1.89 2.15 2.44 2.78 3.23 3.73 4.08 4.13 3.99 3.84 3.41 2.90 2.56 2.05 1.37 0.73 0.35 0.17 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.090.01 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.30 0.60 0.98 1.35 1.62 1.72 1.61 1.26 0.75 0.44 0.38 0.40 0.45 0.55 0.83 1.69 2.84 3.70 4.13 4.02 3.67 3.11 2.60 2.20 1.85 1.59 1.28 1.00 0.76 0.59 0.48 0.46 0.47 0.45 0.46 0.44 0.43 0.43 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.41 0.42 0.40 0.38 0.36 0.39 0.39 0.41 0.52 0.65 0.90 1.21 1.55 1.89 2.17 2.47 2.82 3.26 3.80 4.234.454.48 4.09 3.78 3.60 3.48 3.11 2.37 1.52 0.81 0.34 0.18 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.100.01 0.02 0.06 0.16 0.35 0.60 0.85 1.07 1.21 1.19 1.01 0.71 0.41 0.29 0.29 0.33 0.39 0.50 0.68 1.09 2.14 3.41 4.07 4.12 3.89 3.38 2.75 2.25 1.83 1.54 1.25 0.99 0.74 0.53 0.37 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.25 0.22 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.21 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.19 0.24 0.30 0.48 0.73 1.09 1.44 1.80 2.14 2.42 2.74 3.13 3.63 4.144.554.59 4.27 3.76 3.79 4.34 4.29 3.59 2.66 1.61 0.82 0.37 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.120.01 0.03 0.08 0.20 0.37 0.53 0.68 0.79 0.83 0.77 0.58 0.40 0.25 0.20 0.22 0.26 0.32 0.42 0.58 0.86 1.42 2.64 3.62 4.06 3.92 3.46 2.85 2.28 1.88 1.59 1.34 1.11 0.89 0.68 0.50 0.38 0.30 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.19 0.28 0.47 0.74 1.06 1.40 1.77 2.10 2.38 2.64 2.96 3.33 3.81 4.18 4.42 4.30 3.70 3.20 4.35 5.51 5.17 4.03 2.85 1.65 0.82 0.37 0.20 0.16 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.130.01 0.02 0.04 0.10 0.21 0.33 0.44 0.52 0.57 0.56 0.47 0.32 0.22 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.19 0.25 0.33 0.48 0.71 1.04 1.60 2.68 3.40 3.57 3.31 2.77 2.26 1.90 1.65 1.46 1.31 1.10 0.92 0.79 0.63 0.51 0.42 0.34 0.25 0.19 0.18 0.14 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.25 0.38 0.56 0.83 1.07 1.41 1.76 2.12 2.42 2.65 2.87 3.16 3.46 3.69 3.97 3.93 3.44 2.70 3.01 5.29 6.77 6.05 4.52 3.01 1.67 0.83 0.35 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.14 0.140.01 0.02 0.06 0.11 0.19 0.26 0.33 0.38 0.39 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.19 0.26 0.37 0.55 0.77 1.01 1.48 2.36 2.93 2.86 2.46 2.14 1.92 1.72 1.59 1.45 1.33 1.18 1.06 0.95 0.84 0.74 0.64 0.53 0.41 0.36 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.18 0.25 0.34 0.51 0.70 0.90 1.14 1.46 1.77 2.11 2.46 2.74 2.96 3.19 3.40 3.34 3.38 3.39 3.05 2.37 2.12 3.04 6.01 7.73 6.82 4.86 3.08 1.67 0.82 0.31 0.20 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.170.01 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.15 0.19 0.23 0.26 0.27 0.23 0.15 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.27 0.39 0.53 0.67 0.83 1.29 1.97 2.22 2.08 1.88 1.88 1.83 1.65 1.53 1.47 1.39 1.31 1.24 1.19 1.09 1.00 0.89 0.76 0.68 0.60 0.49 0.45 0.37 0.35 0.32 0.36 0.49 0.65 0.81 1.02 1.26 1.51 1.79 2.11 2.49 2.85 3.09 3.24 3.28 3.20 3.03 2.89 2.53 2.00 1.60 1.76 2.79 5.86 7.66 6.78 4.85 3.06 1.65 0.82 0.32 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.191.05 1.12 1.18 1.24 1.31 1.37 1.41 1.420.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.45 0.54 0.65 1.05 1.46 1.62 1.58 1.59 1.61 1.58 1.56 1.57 1.55 1.51 1.50 1.49 1.45 1.37 1.27 1.18 1.03 0.96 0.86 0.76 0.71 0.65 0.65 0.69 0.80 0.95 1.13 1.35 1.59 1.87 2.18 2.57 2.98 3.35 3.53 3.51 3.27 2.97 2.65 2.22 1.63 1.18 1.17 1.35 2.26 4.83 6.53 5.94 4.46 2.97 1.64 0.82 0.35 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.211.03 1.10 1.18 1.27 1.36 1.44 1.53 1.62 1.72 1.80 1.84 1.85 1.80 1.71 1.52 1.320.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.18 0.24 0.31 0.36 0.38 0.49 0.76 1.06 1.20 1.28 1.34 1.40 1.52 1.67 1.71 1.70 1.75 1.82 1.84 1.77 1.65 1.57 1.43 1.34 1.23 1.13 1.05 1.01 0.99 1.04 1.13 1.24 1.41 1.64 1.92 2.28 2.68 3.14 3.59 3.90 3.94 3.79 3.29 2.75 2.14 1.49 0.98 0.75 0.80 0.98 1.69 3.57 5.08 4.94 3.89 2.77 1.60 0.80 0.36 0.21 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.231.14 1.24 1.33 1.44 1.56 1.67 1.77 1.87 1.99 2.12 2.23 2.30 2.33 2.35 2.37 2.30 2.11 1.81 1.45 1.050.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.21 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.36 0.59 0.79 0.93 1.07 1.22 1.42 1.67 1.90 1.91 2.04 2.20 2.32 2.29 2.16 2.00 1.86 1.73 1.59 1.46 1.35 1.31 1.28 1.33 1.39 1.49 1.62 1.86 2.19 2.65 3.20 3.69 4.05 4.29 4.16 3.75 3.08 2.22 1.42 0.79 0.57 0.52 0.57 0.70 1.21 2.56 3.76 3.96 3.39 2.54 1.54 0.79 0.37 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.261.23 1.35 1.47 1.59 1.72 1.85 1.99 2.11 2.24 2.38 2.52 2.65 2.76 2.83 2.88 2.90 2.98 3.00 2.87 2.53 1.97 1.37 1.09 0.920.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.30 0.48 0.63 0.79 1.00 1.25 1.52 1.78 2.06 2.34 2.67 2.92 2.96 2.83 2.63 2.42 2.19 1.94 1.73 1.59 1.54 1.53 1.54 1.58 1.65 1.76 1.98 2.35 2.91 3.51 4.02 4.24 4.25 3.92 3.15 2.22 1.35 0.76 0.47 0.39 0.39 0.42 0.52 0.91 1.82 2.72 3.10 2.90 2.26 1.46 0.79 0.35 0.21 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.281.26 1.44 1.60 1.76 1.90 2.06 2.21 2.34 2.48 2.61 2.76 2.95 3.11 3.24 3.34 3.38 3.42 3.49 3.62 3.71 3.67 3.37 2.65 1.85 1.41 1.11 0.95 0.870.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.26 0.38 0.54 0.75 1.02 1.34 1.70 2.10 2.60 3.15 3.47 3.61 3.54 3.35 3.05 2.63 2.24 1.95 1.76 1.70 1.65 1.62 1.67 1.78 1.90 2.06 2.39 2.94 3.49 3.85 3.97 3.65 3.00 1.98 1.19 0.76 0.52 0.40 0.33 0.31 0.33 0.38 0.65 1.30 1.98 2.39 2.38 1.97 1.34 0.74 0.38 0.21 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.311.36 1.62 1.83 2.04 2.24 2.41 2.59 2.75 2.90 3.04 3.18 3.38 3.58 3.77 3.91 3.93 3.95 3.98 4.05 4.22 4.43 4.43 4.21 3.43 2.52 1.87 1.36 1.16 1.05 0.96 0.880.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.22 0.32 0.48 0.71 1.05 1.50 2.06 2.67 3.29 3.75 4.03 3.95 3.87 3.50 3.05 2.49 2.11 1.92 1.86 1.72 1.61 1.64 1.77 1.86 1.95 2.21 2.65 3.08 3.13 2.90 2.34 1.63 1.12 0.81 0.59 0.44 0.35 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.33 0.51 0.94 1.47 1.82 1.90 1.66 1.21 0.72 0.36 0.23 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.381.37 1.70 2.02 2.26 2.50 2.73 2.94 3.15 3.37 3.54 3.71 3.92 4.13 4.344.544.61 4.584.54 4.574.64 4.79 4.96 4.99 4.87 4.23 3.35 2.46 1.69 1.44 1.29 1.19 1.09 0.980.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.11 0.16 0.23 0.37 0.59 0.96 1.50 2.18 2.83 3.44 3.88 3.98 3.97 3.60 3.16 2.53 2.11 1.88 1.75 1.58 1.45 1.43 1.48 1.55 1.66 1.89 2.12 2.18 1.90 1.47 1.17 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.43 0.34 0.28 0.25 0.23 0.22 0.28 0.42 0.71 1.11 1.40 1.51 1.37 1.05 0.68 0.38 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.24 0.26 0.29 0.32 0.37 0.421.28 1.71 2.14 2.50 2.75 2.99 3.23 3.47 3.74 4.02 4.28 4.51 4.81 5.09 5.33 5.46 5.44 5.35 5.28 5.28 5.33 5.41 5.43 5.34 5.25 4.86 4.19 3.13 2.13 1.82 1.67 1.52 1.36 1.19 1.060.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.20 0.30 0.45 0.69 1.14 1.66 2.32 2.97 3.31 3.30 3.16 2.85 2.36 1.93 1.63 1.46 1.32 1.21 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.26 1.33 1.26 1.09 0.87 0.77 0.73 0.66 0.54 0.42 0.32 0.25 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.35 0.56 0.87 1.09 1.19 1.13 0.92 0.61 0.37 0.24 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.531.14 1.57 2.11 2.68 3.06 3.30 3.51 3.73 3.98 4.29 4.66 5.06 5.50 5.91 6.25 6.55 6.63 6.52 6.38 6.31 6.23 6.22 6.08 5.99 5.77 5.62 5.42 4.94 3.82 2.80 2.51 2.23 1.96 1.78 1.60 1.35 1.10 0.900.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.20 0.30 0.44 0.63 0.86 1.15 1.47 1.75 1.90 2.02 1.99 1.79 1.52 1.30 1.11 0.99 0.90 0.84 0.82 0.80 0.77 0.66 0.57 0.45 0.49 0.50 0.47 0.42 0.36 0.29 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.20 0.30 0.47 0.72 0.89 0.98 0.97 0.83 0.58 0.35 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.43 0.50 0.59 0.70 0.85 1.27 1.87 2.61 3.28 3.67 3.88 4.04 4.23 4.50 4.84 5.31 5.87 6.53 7.16 7.63 7.95 8.02 7.94 7.81 7.68 7.53 7.30 7.12 7.04 6.89 6.69 6.56 6.00 5.10 4.16 3.53 3.08 2.84 2.53 2.12 1.69 1.32 1.06 0.890.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.11 0.17 0.25 0.34 0.45 0.59 0.75 0.89 0.92 0.89 0.87 0.87 0.89 0.83 0.78 0.71 0.64 0.59 0.54 0.50 0.45 0.37 0.31 0.26 0.29 0.33 0.33 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.19 0.28 0.43 0.66 0.81 0.89 0.89 0.79 0.58 0.35 0.24 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.29 0.32 0.36 0.41 0.47 0.54 0.64 0.78 0.96 1.35 2.13 3.08 3.88 4.32 4.52 4.63 4.81 5.12 5.52 6.12 6.84 7.68 8.45 9.02 9.36 9.50 9.52 9.44 9.30 9.09 8.93 9.02 9.15 9.11 8.97 9.01 8.51 7.35 6.07 5.07 4.49 4.02 3.45 2.76 2.12 1.64 1.31 1.07 0.890.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.10 0.15 0.19 0.25 0.30 0.39 0.49 0.57 0.58 0.55 0.52 0.44 0.34 0.37 0.32 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.27 0.22 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.18 0.27 0.42 0.64 0.80 0.89 0.90 0.79 0.58 0.35 0.25 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.51 0.59 0.69 0.84 1.09 1.45 2.34 3.45 4.38 4.82 5.04 5.21 5.46 5.87 6.45 7.20 8.08 8.96 9.74 10.28 10.66 10.95 11.19 11.31 11.30 11.48 12.04 12.40 12.37 12.37 12.36 12.44 11.79 9.74 7.87 6.71 6.02 5.31 4.40 3.47 2.67 2.02 1.58 1.27 1.04 0.840.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.16 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.30 0.24 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.18 0.28 0.44 0.67 0.84 0.93 0.92 0.81 0.59 0.37 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.43 0.49 0.56 0.65 0.76 0.91 1.19 1.68 2.51 3.74 4.83 5.14 5.40 5.69 6.13 6.73 7.54 8.47 9.45 10.38 11.17 11.77 12.30 12.87 13.48 14.00 14.64 15.88 17.02 16.94 16.52 16.42 16.26 16.01 14.63 11.76 9.56 8.05 7.05 6.21 5.17 4.08 3.10 2.37 1.85 1.49 1.19 0.96 0.750.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.16 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.21 0.17 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.18 0.30 0.49 0.77 0.97 1.07 1.04 0.88 0.62 0.39 0.29 0.27 0.29 0.32 0.36 0.41 0.47 0.54 0.62 0.72 0.86 1.02 1.26 1.85 2.77 3.98 4.95 5.35 5.68 6.25 6.93 7.76 8.77 9.88 11.04 12.24 13.26 14.14 14.85 15.85 17.01 18.07 19.03 20.39 21.79 21.59 21.10 20.77 19.84 19.54 17.68 13.71 10.93 9.04 7.78 6.84 5.76 4.53 3.44 2.64 2.07 1.65 1.33 1.08 0.840.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.20 0.35 0.61 0.96 1.22 1.32 1.24 1.00 0.66 0.43 0.30 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.51 0.60 0.69 0.81 0.96 1.15 1.40 1.85 2.94 4.26 5.11 5.75 6.43 7.38 8.50 9.73 11.20 12.67 13.95 15.33 16.75 17.74 18.52 19.64 21.07 22.18 23.03 24.96 26.86 25.85 24.56 23.37 22.04 22.05 20.68 16.25 12.81 10.24 8.44 7.30 6.13 4.85 3.72 2.88 2.27 1.82 1.46 1.19 0.94 0.740.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.16 0.24 0.43 0.79 1.25 1.58 1.67 1.50 1.13 0.74 0.44 0.30 0.31 0.33 0.37 0.42 0.49 0.56 0.66 0.78 0.92 1.10 1.32 1.61 2.03 2.88 4.35 5.62 6.84 7.99 9.50 11.06 12.93 15.20 17.51 18.78 19.50 20.51 22.06 23.60 25.04 26.10 27.02 27.71 29.32 30.22 27.0823.79 19.08 14.63 11.45 9.04 7.65 6.44 5.15 3.99 3.11 2.46 1.97 1.59 1.30 1.05 0.830.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.19 0.28 0.52 1.06 1.66 2.04 2.10 1.79 1.28 0.78 0.45 0.33 0.32 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.61 0.73 0.87 1.06 1.29 1.58 1.98 2.55 3.41 4.95 6.92 8.80 10.56 12.39 14.43 16.52 19.12 21.88 23.30 23.81 25.08 26.76 27.72 28.04 28.05 28.5826.42 21.55 16.26 12.83 9.74 7.97 6.72 5.47 4.27 3.34 2.64 2.12 1.71 1.40 1.14 0.91 0.720.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.19 0.23 0.33 0.69 1.48 2.25 2.66 2.58 2.09 1.39 0.81 0.45 0.31 0.33 0.37 0.42 0.48 0.56 0.66 0.79 0.96 1.18 1.48 1.87 2.40 3.16 4.35 6.17 8.68 11.43 13.79 15.67 17.97 20.41 22.87 25.81 28.18 28.80 28.99 28.9727.84 23.23 17.61 13.96 10.42 8.20 6.89 5.73 4.56 3.59 2.84 2.26 1.83 1.49 1.22 0.98 0.780.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.18 0.23 0.31 0.45 0.95 2.08 3.10 3.41 3.07 2.35 1.50 0.82 0.45 0.33 0.34 0.38 0.44 0.50 0.59 0.71 0.87 1.09 1.41 1.84 2.43 3.19 4.15 5.44 7.20 9.59 12.82 16.28 18.67 20.64 22.95 24.76 26.4923.83 18.60 14.57 11.12 8.39 6.98 5.90 4.83 3.85 3.05 2.42 1.94 1.57 1.27 1.03 0.83 0.670.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.16 0.21 0.29 0.41 0.61 1.30 2.94 4.27 4.29 3.52 2.58 1.55 0.84 0.41 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.52 0.61 0.74 0.93 1.20 1.60 2.19 3.00 4.01 5.19 6.53 8.05 10.07 13.15 17.74 21.03 22.0423.05 18.96 14.79 11.49 8.55 7.05 6.02 5.06 4.12 3.29 2.59 2.05 1.63 1.32 1.08 0.88 0.710.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.18 0.26 0.37 0.55 0.81 1.74 4.04 5.61 5.22 4.02 2.80 1.58 0.85 0.44 0.33 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.63 0.77 0.96 1.25 1.70 2.41 3.39 4.58 5.83 6.99 8.27 10.33 13.28 18.22 23.0321.12 19.03 15.29 11.80 8.77 7.14 6.09 5.20 4.34 3.52 2.75 2.14 1.70 1.37 1.13 0.93 0.76 0.600.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.21 0.29 0.44 0.67 1.02 2.23 5.23 6.95 6.19 4.53 2.92 1.62 0.86 0.42 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.54 0.66 0.81 1.03 1.34 1.83 2.58 3.60 4.79 6.05 7.17 8.41 10.54 13.63 18.26 23.9619.52 19.07 16.29 12.52 9.31 7.40 6.25 5.34 4.50 3.63 2.84 2.22 1.76 1.44 1.19 0.98 0.80 0.640.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.16 0.22 0.31 0.46 0.71 1.14 2.44 5.80 7.59 6.63 4.76 3.00 1.67 0.88 0.41 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.55 0.69 0.86 1.10 1.43 1.90 2.59 3.51 4.71 5.95 7.14 8.34 10.21 13.71 17.74 23.5719.25 17.34 13.51 9.99 7.74 6.46 5.53 4.63 3.69 2.87 2.25 1.81 1.49 1.24 1.02 0.83 0.670.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.15 0.21 0.30 0.44 0.67 1.03 2.27 5.31 7.04 6.26 4.56 2.93 1.63 0.86 0.42 0.33 0.35 0.38 0.45 0.55 0.70 0.89 1.14 1.48 1.93 2.53 3.34 4.39 5.63 6.90 8.09 9.85 13.20 16.73 22.20 26.9118.98 17.79 14.40 10.71 8.15 6.73 5.73 4.76 3.76 2.91 2.27 1.82 1.51 1.27 1.06 0.86 0.70 0.570.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.18 0.26 0.37 0.56 0.82 1.79 4.14 5.72 5.29 4.06 2.82 1.61 0.87 0.44 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.55 0.70 0.91 1.17 1.48 1.89 2.43 3.15 4.07 5.27 6.53 7.73 9.35 12.21 15.70 20.19 24.3118.88 18.22 15.14 11.76 8.78 7.08 5.98 4.91 3.83 2.94 2.28 1.83 1.53 1.29 1.10 0.88 0.72 0.590.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.21 0.30 0.42 0.62 1.34 3.02 4.38 4.37 3.57 2.61 1.57 0.85 0.43 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.45 0.54 0.69 0.89 1.16 1.45 1.84 2.33 2.97 3.82 4.92 6.15 7.25 8.66 11.23 14.47 17.97 21.5019.34 19.37 16.34 13.04 9.79 7.44 6.17 5.07 3.93 2.98 2.31 1.86 1.55 1.32 1.13 0.92 0.74 0.610.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.23 0.31 0.46 0.98 2.15 3.19 3.49 3.12 2.39 1.53 0.83 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.39 0.45 0.54 0.67 0.87 1.14 1.42 1.78 2.24 2.82 3.58 4.58 5.73 6.77 7.89 10.01 13.00 16.20 19.5021.32 18.24 14.39 10.84 8.00 6.33 5.19 4.02 3.03 2.34 1.89 1.57 1.35 1.15 0.96 0.77 0.630.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.18 0.23 0.34 0.71 1.52 2.32 2.72 2.63 2.13 1.42 0.82 0.44 0.32 0.34 0.39 0.45 0.54 0.67 0.86 1.11 1.38 1.71 2.12 2.66 3.38 4.30 5.33 6.31 7.29 8.84 11.61 15.10 18.37 19.2323.44 20.36 15.62 11.79 8.46 6.50 5.27 4.12 3.11 2.42 1.94 1.62 1.38 1.18 0.99 0.81 0.650.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.19 0.28 0.53 1.09 1.71 2.10 2.16 1.84 1.32 0.79 0.45 0.33 0.33 0.38 0.44 0.53 0.66 0.84 1.07 1.34 1.64 2.02 2.53 3.20 4.05 5.02 5.89 6.78 8.12 10.47 14.12 17.71 19.1424.59 21.69 16.66 12.80 8.89 6.60 5.35 4.24 3.25 2.53 2.02 1.67 1.42 1.21 1.01 0.83 0.68 0.540.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.23 0.44 0.81 1.29 1.63 1.73 1.56 1.19 0.77 0.44 0.31 0.32 0.36 0.43 0.51 0.64 0.81 1.03 1.28 1.56 1.92 2.40 3.05 3.84 4.70 5.54 6.41 7.60 9.69 13.00 16.83 18.9721.92 17.23 13.35 9.36 6.66 5.37 4.36 3.44 2.68 2.13 1.74 1.45 1.21 1.02 0.85 0.70 0.560.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.19 0.35 0.62 0.99 1.27 1.39 1.31 1.07 0.71 0.44 0.31 0.31 0.36 0.42 0.50 0.61 0.78 0.98 1.20 1.46 1.80 2.25 2.86 3.62 4.42 5.23 6.09 7.16 8.93 11.91 15.49 18.42 19.1520.97 17.12 13.14 9.66 6.68 5.35 4.43 3.62 2.88 2.28 1.82 1.47 1.20 1.01 0.86 0.71 0.570.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.29 0.49 0.78 1.00 1.13 1.12 0.98 0.70 0.44 0.32 0.31 0.34 0.40 0.48 0.59 0.74 0.92 1.12 1.36 1.66 2.08 2.63 3.31 4.09 4.93 5.82 6.82 8.29 11.14 14.48 18.28 20.6319.26 16.75 12.99 9.63 6.84 5.36 4.49 3.77 3.08 2.44 1.90 1.49 1.21 1.02 0.87 0.74 0.590.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.24 0.41 0.66 0.86 0.99 1.03 0.96 0.74 0.47 0.33 0.31 0.33 0.39 0.47 0.57 0.70 0.87 1.06 1.27 1.55 1.92 2.37 2.95 3.69 4.58 5.55 6.57 7.88 10.67 14.03 18.16 21.9717.44 16.79 13.66 9.99 7.12 5.47 4.56 3.89 3.23 2.56 1.97 1.54 1.24 1.05 0.89 0.75 0.610.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.21 0.35 0.58 0.78 0.93 1.01 0.99 0.81 0.54 0.36 0.32 0.32 0.38 0.45 0.54 0.66 0.82 1.00 1.21 1.46 1.75 2.12 2.62 3.30 4.16 5.18 6.21 7.46 9.95 13.67 17.65 22.2716.89 14.87 10.90 7.62 5.69 4.68 3.99 3.31 2.59 1.99 1.55 1.26 1.07 0.91 0.75 0.610.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.12 0.19 0.31 0.52 0.74 0.92 1.05 1.07 0.94 0.67 0.44 0.34 0.32 0.37 0.43 0.52 0.63 0.78 0.95 1.15 1.36 1.61 1.91 2.34 2.93 3.74 4.76 5.79 6.97 9.07 12.72 16.50 21.42 24.4216.27 15.33 11.66 8.22 6.06 4.87 4.12 3.38 2.61 1.97 1.54 1.25 1.07 0.91 0.76 0.610.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.16 0.28 0.46 0.72 0.97 1.17 1.26 1.15 0.86 0.56 0.36 0.33 0.36 0.42 0.50 0.60 0.73 0.89 1.08 1.28 1.49 1.75 2.09 2.59 3.30 4.26 5.31 6.42 8.21 11.31 15.01 19.43 22.5615.91 15.39 12.13 9.00 6.53 5.17 4.30 3.49 2.63 1.96 1.51 1.23 1.05 0.90 0.77 0.600.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.15 0.26 0.43 0.74 1.09 1.40 1.55 1.45 1.12 0.72 0.44 0.35 0.36 0.41 0.48 0.57 0.68 0.82 1.00 1.20 1.39 1.61 1.90 2.32 2.92 3.78 4.82 5.84 7.25 9.97 13.44 16.76 19.8716.00 15.86 12.81 10.25 7.48 5.51 4.54 3.62 2.67 1.96 1.50 1.21 1.02 0.88 0.760.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.22 0.43 0.77 1.25 1.68 1.92 1.82 1.43 0.90 0.54 0.36 0.36 0.40 0.47 0.54 0.64 0.76 0.92 1.13 1.30 1.50 1.76 2.13 2.65 3.39 4.35 5.31 6.34 8.47 11.64 14.42 17.5717.05 14.23 11.45 8.55 6.03 4.75 3.79 2.77 1.98 1.49 1.19 1.00 0.86 0.740.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.22 0.40 0.81 1.43 2.02 2.38 2.29 1.79 1.16 0.68 0.41 0.36 0.40 0.45 0.52 0.60 0.71 0.86 1.06 1.23 1.42 1.65 1.98 2.44 3.11 3.97 4.81 5.69 7.14 9.78 12.91 16.21 16.7918.74 15.86 12.22 9.26 6.51 4.93 3.91 2.90 2.07 1.52 1.18 0.97 0.84 0.730.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.21 0.39 0.85 1.66 2.48 2.96 2.85 2.27 1.47 0.84 0.45 0.37 0.39 0.43 0.49 0.56 0.66 0.80 0.98 1.16 1.35 1.56 1.86 2.29 2.90 3.66 4.41 5.16 6.34 8.53 11.92 15.51 16.4019.87 17.01 12.77 9.77 6.70 5.02 3.97 3.02 2.18 1.57 1.19 0.96 0.820.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.23 0.36 0.84 1.91 3.09 3.72 3.49 2.80 1.85 1.03 0.58 0.37 0.38 0.42 0.47 0.53 0.62 0.75 0.91 1.09 1.27 1.48 1.76 2.17 2.74 3.44 4.09 4.76 5.73 7.62 10.79 14.65 16.3819.35 17.26 13.04 9.76 6.73 4.93 3.88 3.04 2.26 1.64 1.23 0.96 0.800.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.19 0.27 0.41 0.81 2.10 3.87 4.77 4.35 3.46 2.31 1.31 0.75 0.41 0.37 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.58 0.71 0.85 1.00 1.17 1.36 1.64 2.04 2.60 3.24 3.86 4.48 5.31 6.89 9.59 13.04 15.6716.58 12.83 9.15 6.62 4.69 3.65 2.93 2.27 1.69 1.27 0.98 0.790.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.16 0.22 0.31 0.47 0.82 2.17 4.57 6.02 5.52 4.30 2.85 1.63 0.93 0.48 0.37 0.38 0.42 0.47 0.54 0.65 0.79 0.92 1.06 1.23 1.49 1.87 2.38 2.99 3.61 4.25 5.02 6.35 8.76 11.69 14.97 16.6914.22 14.86 12.30 8.67 6.21 4.37 3.32 2.69 2.16 1.70 1.30 1.000.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.17 0.24 0.35 0.55 0.88 2.05 4.94 7.05 6.77 5.12 3.46 2.03 1.12 0.61 0.37 0.36 0.39 0.44 0.50 0.60 0.73 0.86 0.98 1.14 1.37 1.69 2.11 2.66 3.33 4.04 4.81 5.97 8.50 11.35 14.54 17.6411.09 10.54 11.35 11.55 11.72 12.21 11.22 8.52 5.92 4.06 2.98 2.40 1.97 1.60 1.27 1.000.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.17 0.25 0.38 0.59 0.92 1.73 4.44 7.12 7.32 5.64 3.92 2.46 1.37 0.76 0.42 0.35 0.36 0.40 0.46 0.55 0.67 0.80 0.93 1.08 1.26 1.51 1.84 2.32 2.99 3.79 4.62 5.70 8.05 11.22 14.12 17.939.04 9.05 9.54 11.21 11.59 10.43 9.97 10.00 9.75 9.78 9.78 8.07 5.61 3.76 2.66 2.09 1.72 1.42 1.150.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.18 0.25 0.37 0.56 0.84 1.36 3.19 5.92 6.69 5.45 3.99 2.77 1.66 0.93 0.51 0.35 0.34 0.38 0.43 0.51 0.62 0.74 0.87 1.01 1.16 1.34 1.60 2.01 2.62 3.46 4.38 5.37 7.30 10.39 13.10 17.15 19.809.36 8.96 8.67 8.47 8.31 8.28 8.37 9.51 10.97 10.53 9.47 8.93 8.45 8.12 7.93 6.86 5.11 3.39 2.35 1.79 1.46 1.22 1.010.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.17 0.24 0.33 0.48 0.70 0.98 1.87 3.89 5.14 4.86 3.84 2.87 1.93 1.12 0.63 0.37 0.33 0.36 0.40 0.47 0.57 0.68 0.81 0.94 1.06 1.20 1.41 1.74 2.27 3.08 4.04 4.99 6.47 8.97 11.67 15.38 18.2910.64 11.94 10.48 8.76 8.30 7.96 7.70 7.59 7.54 7.51 7.88 8.80 9.05 8.50 7.87 7.32 6.76 6.18 5.49 4.48 3.22 2.05 1.52 1.22 1.020.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.27 0.38 0.52 0.68 1.04 2.26 3.55 3.84 3.47 2.81 2.04 1.29 0.76 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.43 0.51 0.61 0.73 0.86 0.96 1.08 1.25 1.52 1.98 2.71 3.64 4.53 5.62 7.52 10.00 12.99 15.83 15.03 12.88 11.99 10.52 10.57 11.50 9.87 8.12 7.64 7.33 7.10 6.97 6.94 6.81 6.75 6.87 6.76 6.53 6.12 5.76 5.30 4.75 4.41 3.91 3.26 2.07 1.28 1.03 0.850.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.17 0.21 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.62 1.24 2.19 2.75 2.82 2.54 2.01 1.41 0.89 0.53 0.36 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.46 0.54 0.65 0.78 0.88 0.99 1.13 1.36 1.75 2.38 3.21 3.98 4.79 6.15 8.19 10.59 13.25 12.96 11.26 10.39 9.84 10.17 10.76 9.00 7.52 7.01 6.83 6.63 6.51 6.40 6.25 5.99 5.65 5.24 4.92 4.60 4.38 4.16 3.94 3.88 3.69 3.13 2.11 1.25 0.860.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.25 0.31 0.39 0.69 1.29 1.85 2.11 2.08 1.82 1.40 0.97 0.63 0.42 0.34 0.33 0.36 0.42 0.48 0.58 0.72 0.80 0.90 1.02 1.21 1.56 2.11 2.79 3.41 4.02 4.95 6.56 8.66 10.92 10.87 9.66 9.14 9.07 9.27 8.94 7.63 6.70 6.43 6.31 6.18 6.05 5.91 5.70 5.38 4.91 4.45 4.10 3.85 3.71 3.67 3.69 3.77 3.70 2.89 1.91 1.21 0.780.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.19 0.22 0.26 0.42 0.76 1.19 1.51 1.62 1.54 1.30 1.00 0.69 0.49 0.37 0.33 0.34 0.38 0.44 0.53 0.64 0.74 0.82 0.92 1.10 1.39 1.84 2.39 2.88 3.30 3.95 5.23 7.05 8.94 9.03 8.28 8.08 7.89 7.54 6.86 6.15 5.84 5.78 5.74 5.67 5.60 5.45 5.20 4.84 4.39 4.02 3.71 3.54 3.46 3.51 3.62 3.68 3.60 2.71 1.71 1.030.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.19 0.27 0.47 0.75 1.05 1.22 1.22 1.14 0.97 0.77 0.57 0.42 0.35 0.33 0.36 0.41 0.49 0.58 0.67 0.74 0.84 0.99 1.25 1.62 2.04 2.39 2.70 3.13 4.06 5.54 7.01 7.37 6.85 6.64 6.25 5.70 5.22 4.95 4.94 5.05 5.15 5.19 5.18 5.07 4.81 4.44 4.05 3.75 3.49 3.37 3.32 3.36 3.45 3.43 3.18 2.51 1.600.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.20 0.30 0.46 0.71 0.89 0.97 0.99 0.94 0.85 0.71 0.55 0.40 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.45 0.53 0.60 0.67 0.76 0.90 1.12 1.42 1.72 1.96 2.17 2.47 3.07 4.17 5.20 5.57 5.29 5.08 4.72 4.39 4.17 4.16 4.26 4.40 4.57 4.71 4.77 4.70 4.46 4.16 3.81 3.55 3.33 3.21 3.15 3.15 3.17 3.06 2.73 2.15 1.440.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.21 0.32 0.48 0.66 0.80 0.88 0.92 0.91 0.84 0.69 0.51 0.40 0.34 0.35 0.41 0.48 0.55 0.61 0.69 0.81 1.01 1.22 1.42 1.58 1.72 1.91 2.27 3.23 4.09 4.27 4.12 4.03 3.85 3.73 3.63 3.68 3.80 3.92 4.11 4.28 4.34 4.23 4.08 3.86 3.58 3.35 3.15 3.01 2.90 2.82 2.76 2.63 2.31 1.760.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.23 0.34 0.50 0.66 0.80 0.90 0.98 0.98 0.90 0.70 0.51 0.37 0.34 0.38 0.44 0.50 0.56 0.63 0.74 0.88 1.02 1.15 1.26 1.35 1.47 1.72 2.66 3.55 3.81 3.76 3.70 3.59 3.47 3.43 3.42 3.49 3.61 3.73 3.86 3.86 3.73 3.59 3.41 3.23 3.05 2.87 2.72 2.59 2.45 2.31 2.14 1.830.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.17 0.25 0.38 0.54 0.71 0.89 1.06 1.19 1.17 0.98 0.72 0.47 0.38 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.52 0.58 0.66 0.75 0.84 0.93 1.00 1.06 1.14 1.34 2.15 3.00 3.54 3.78 3.68 3.55 3.39 3.28 3.24 3.25 3.33 3.40 3.39 3.32 3.22 3.07 2.90 2.77 2.64 2.49 2.35 2.22 2.06 1.89 1.710.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.13 0.18 0.29 0.42 0.64 0.91 1.20 1.45 1.52 1.35 1.01 0.65 0.43 0.37 0.39 0.43 0.48 0.53 0.58 0.63 0.69 0.75 0.79 0.83 0.89 1.03 1.60 2.27 3.03 3.58 3.55 3.44 3.26 3.11 3.03 3.02 3.04 3.02 2.93 2.81 2.66 2.52 2.40 2.29 2.17 2.04 1.92 1.81 1.66 1.500.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.14 0.22 0.36 0.56 0.92 1.34 1.72 1.92 1.80 1.39 0.93 0.56 0.40 0.38 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.50 0.53 0.57 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.82 1.14 1.59 2.36 3.04 3.21 3.15 2.97 2.84 2.76 2.70 2.65 2.57 2.47 2.32 2.17 2.03 1.93 1.84 1.73 1.63 1.53 1.430.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.18 0.28 0.50 0.90 1.46 2.02 2.40 2.35 1.92 1.30 0.80 0.46 0.37 0.38 0.40 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47 0.49 0.51 0.54 0.57 0.66 0.82 1.10 1.73 2.29 2.57 2.66 2.59 2.46 2.38 2.33 2.22 2.12 2.00 1.88 1.74 1.63 1.54 1.45 1.35 1.260.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.24 0.41 0.84 1.54 2.35 2.94 3.00 2.56 1.80 1.09 0.66 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.46 0.52 0.61 0.78 1.23 1.63 1.92 2.07 2.10 2.03 1.96 1.90 1.79 1.69 1.58 1.48 1.38 1.30 1.21 1.13 1.060.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.20 0.35 0.70 1.55 2.69 3.59 3.77 3.30 2.50 1.56 0.93 0.50 0.36 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.39 0.43 0.47 0.57 0.86 1.11 1.35 1.55 1.60 1.59 1.54 1.49 1.41 1.31 1.23 1.15 1.08 1.01 0.940.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.20 0.30 0.59 1.40 2.94 4.42 4.84 4.29 3.38 2.20 1.29 0.77 0.39 0.32 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.35 0.38 0.44 0.61 0.76 0.91 1.08 1.16 1.20 1.19 1.130.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.22 0.31 0.51 1.15 2.84 5.08 6.22 5.68 4.40 3.01 1.80 1.04 0.57 0.33 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.30 0.31 0.35 0.45 0.540.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.23 0.33 0.52 0.93 2.35 5.20 7.19 6.96 5.43 3.81 2.46 1.44 0.81 0.43 0.28 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.28 0.34 0.400.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.23 0.34 0.55 0.87 1.68 4.11 6.84 7.42 5.97 4.30 3.03 1.94 1.13 0.64 0.35 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.27 0.31 0.340.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.11 0.16 0.23 0.34 0.53 0.79 1.24 2.48 4.91 6.17 5.68 4.39 3.28 2.37 1.52 0.90 0.51 0.30 0.22 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.23 0.25 0.270.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.15 0.22 0.31 0.45 0.65 0.91 1.32 2.62 4.12 4.56 4.03 3.29 2.55 1.79 1.15 0.69 0.39 0.23 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.220.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.14 0.20 0.26 0.36 0.49 0.65 0.78 1.21 2.20 3.01 3.11 2.87 2.44 1.89 1.34 0.88 0.54 0.33 0.22 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.190.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.17 0.21 0.27 0.34 0.42 0.49 0.61 1.06 1.71 2.10 2.18 2.05 1.76 1.39 1.01 0.67 0.43 0.27 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.160.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.36 0.52 0.88 1.27 1.51 1.57 1.48 1.27 1.03 0.80 0.56 0.38 0.23 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.1425.7026.6827.0228.7032.7431.9530.7030.4029.5728.5528.5229.5230.3830.6931.8632.8528.8827.0926.7625.7428.7128.7027.8327.4430.8730.2528.7129.0429.0428.3028.2829.0029.0528.7130.1831.0127.5227.8228.7628.7130.9730.2928.0225.7128.3527.8426.0426.7727.7228.2428.2827.7626.8126.0127.7328.4625.7427.8930.3130.9631.0131.1628.7324.9425.9724.7422.9524.1626.9630.1730.2427.1424.2222.9524.6526.0424.9028.6131.2031.0428.3228.8228.0726.1927.8425.9224.3225.4927.5429.5229.6027.6925.5824.3625.8427.8526.2327.9928.9028.3424.6124.3923.5823.7426.0023.8622.8123.3523.7223.9823.9623.7323.3622.8123.7926.0123.8023.5724.4424.6321.6221.4521.2622.4523.0620.5920.0620.6420.9921.1321.1321.0020.6520.0720.5423.0022.5421.2821.4821.6220.0720.3320.7821.8621.1919.5119.3519.6819.8219.7719.7719.8219.6919.3619.4921.1621.9020.8020.3520.1019.8520.2520.4620.2919.3918.7118.7018.8018.8218.6418.6318.8118.8018.7218.7119.3620.3020.4820.2719.8819.3519.7219.9719.9218.9018.0617.9417.9317.8817.7517.7517.8817.9417.9518.0518.8819.9119.9919.7519.3818.8318.9819.3420.4219.5917.4416.9917.0517.0817.0917.0917.0917.0517.0117.4219.5420.4719.3819.0018.8519.9319.3818.6819.4919.9217.2216.1416.2316.4216.5616.5616.4316.2516.1517.1719.9019.5618.7119.3819.9222.2721.0919.1018.0719.5917.0915.5215.5915.7916.0616.0715.8115.6015.5217.0119.6318.1319.0621.0822.2124.6822.6219.9017.1918.7516.9314.9014.9515.1715.4315.4315.1814.9614.8916.8418.8017.1619.8022.6224.6026.0323.2720.0816.6717.9716.5614.2814.3314.6214.8214.8314.6414.3314.2616.4718.0316.6719.9623.2525.9225.3822.6319.4216.0417.3415.9513.6813.7213.9614.2514.2513.9713.7213.6715.8617.4016.0419.3122.6125.2822.7420.6317.9415.3316.9915.1013.1113.1613.3313.5813.5813.3413.1613.0915.0017.0215.3317.8620.6222.6719.4918.1816.1815.3116.7814.1812.6112.6812.8312.9612.9612.8412.6912.6114.1016.8115.3416.1318.1919.4617.0716.2915.4516.0516.1713.3412.3112.2812.3012.3812.3812.3112.2912.3113.3016.1516.1415.4816.3517.1016.5116.3216.1416.5215.0812.8312.1712.0311.9511.8911.8911.9512.0312.1812.8215.0716.6016.2116.4016.6216.6316.7616.7116.2114.3512.4711.9811.8311.7411.5511.5411.7311.8312.0012.4814.3416.2816.8016.8416.7216.1215.8915.7415.9914.5512.3611.6811.5611.4711.4211.4211.4711.5611.6912.3414.5616.0515.7815.9516.2016.0715.2714.4315.0015.1212.3511.3011.2811.2911.3711.3711.3011.2911.3012.3015.0915.0614.4215.3016.1117.7316.3614.4513.6215.1312.5510.9911.0711.2111.3311.3311.2211.0810.9912.4615.1313.6314.4016.4217.7620.1918.0415.4712.8814.5912.7810.7510.7810.9611.2111.2110.9810.7810.7212.6614.6112.8915.3718.0620.1321.8819.1716.1412.8014.0812.8110.4510.4010.5610.8510.8610.5810.3910.4112.6514.1512.7615.9619.1421.7621.6418.9215.9412.5313.7712.5110.099.9610.0410.1510.1510.059.9510.0312.3313.8512.4415.7118.8521.4119.4217.4114.8612.1213.5711.859.619.419.329.319.319.329.399.5611.6813.6712.0414.6317.3119.16ASSOCIATED LIGHTING REPRESENTATIVES, INC7777 PARDEE LANEP.O. BOX 2265OAKLAND, CA 94621PHONE: (510) 638-3800 - FAX (510) 638-2908* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *ALL VALUES SHOWN ARE MAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES AT GRADEPHOTOMETRIC DATA USED AS INPUT FOR THESE CALCULATIONSIS BASED ON ESTABLISHED IES PROCEDURES AND PUBLISHEDLAMP, RATINGS. FIELD PERFORMANCE WILL DEPEND ON ACTUALLAMP, BALLAST, ELECTRICAL AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS.Calculations have been performed according to IES standards and good practice.Some differences between measured values and calculated results may occur due tomeasurement techniques and field conditions such as voltage and temperaturevariations. Input data used to generate the attached calculations such as roomdimensions, reflectances, furniture and architectural elements significantly affect thelighting calculations. If the real environment conditions do not match the input data,differences will occur between measured values and calculated values.REPORT FOR: AURUM CONSULTING ENGINEERSBY: APPLICATIONS ENGINEERING; GILBERTO J. RODRIGUEZSALES REPRESENTATIVE: ALR; JD STEPHENSAGI32 VERSION 19.11AGI (C) 1999-2020 LIGHTING ANALYSTS, INC.10268 W. CENTENNIAL ROAD, SUITE 202LITTLETON, CO 80127FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 34605 LOCKHART ST. DUBLIN CADRAWING NO. / INPUT FILEPROJECT DESCRIPTION17734JDS - E2.2N.DWG /.AGISCALE1" = 16'SHEET1 OF 2DATE02.21.2020REV0***LIGHTING LAYOUT RECOMMENDATION*****PARTIAL SITE*** TWIN ROTATED ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.** HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLE VALUES SHOWN AT 36" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.1.0FC0.5FCLuminaire ScheduleProject: FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 - PARTIAL SITESymbolQtyLabelArrangementLum. LumensLLFLDDLLDDescriptionFilenameLum. Watts6XASINGLE66520.8500.9000.944SIGNIFY GARDCO GL13-XXX-1-2-70LA-6435-NW-VOLT-XXX - 15' POLEGL13-2-70LA-6435-NW.IES706XA1SINGLE67500.8500.9000.944SIGNIFY GARDCO GL13-XXX-1-3-70LA-6435-NW-VOLT-XXX - 15' POLEGL13-3-70LA-6435-NW.IES70.18XB *TWIN274320.8500.9000.944VISIONAIRE BLX-II-4-T4-128LC-5-4K-VOLT-XX-XX-(TWIN) - 25' POLEBLX-II_4_T4_128LC_5_4K.IES211Calculation SummaryProject: FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 - PARTIAL SITELabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/Min# PtsCRICKET BATTING CAGE_Workplane **IlluminanceFc18.5632.859.311.993.53560PATHWAY AIlluminanceFc2.575.010.882.925.69238PATHWAY BIlluminanceFc3.027.730.634.7912.27263 CRICKET BATTING CAGE_WorkplanePATHWAY BPATHWAY BPATHWAY BMATCHLINEXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXA1XAXAXAXA1.611.641.771.861.952.212.653.083.132.902.341.631.120.810.590.440.350.290.260.260.330.510.941.471.821.901.661.210.720.360.230.190.190.200.220.240.270.300.340.381.371.702.022.262.502.732.943.153.373.543.713.924.134.344.544.614.584.544.574.644.794.964.994.874.233.352.461.691.441.291.191.090.981.451.431.481.551.661.892.122.181.901.471.171.000.800.600.430.340.280.250.230.220.280.420.711.111.401.511.371.050.680.380.210.190.200.210.240.260.290.320.370.421.281.712.142.502.752.993.233.473.744.024.284.514.815.095.335.465.445.355.285.285.335.415.435.345.254.864.193.132.131.821.671.521.361.191.061.211.161.161.191.261.331.261.090.870.770.730.660.540.420.320.250.220.200.190.190.230.350.560.871.091.191.130.920.610.370.240.200.210.230.250.280.310.350.400.460.531.141.572.112.683.063.303.513.733.984.294.665.065.505.916.256.556.636.526.386.316.236.226.085.995.775.625.424.943.822.802.512.231.961.781.601.351.100.900.900.840.820.800.770.660.570.450.490.500.470.420.360.290.230.190.170.160.150.170.200.300.470.720.890.980.970.830.580.350.240.220.220.240.270.300.340.380.430.500.590.700.851.271.872.613.283.673.884.044.234.504.845.315.876.537.167.637.958.027.947.817.687.537.307.127.046.896.696.566.005.104.163.533.082.842.532.121.691.321.060.890.590.540.500.450.370.310.260.290.330.330.300.270.240.200.180.160.140.130.130.140.190.280.430.660.810.890.890.790.580.350.240.230.240.260.290.320.360.410.470.540.640.780.961.352.133.083.884.324.524.634.815.125.526.126.847.688.459.029.369.509.529.449.309.098.939.029.159.118.979.018.517.356.075.074.494.023.452.762.121.641.311.070.890.320.290.270.220.180.180.180.200.230.230.200.180.170.150.140.130.120.120.120.130.180.270.420.640.800.890.900.790.580.350.250.230.250.280.310.350.390.450.510.590.690.841.091.452.343.454.384.825.045.215.465.876.457.208.088.969.7410.2810.6610.9511.1911.3111.3011.4812.0412.4012.3712.3712.3612.4411.799.747.876.716.025.314.403.472.672.021.581.271.040.840.160.160.130.110.110.110.120.140.160.160.140.130.130.120.110.110.110.110.110.130.180.280.440.670.840.930.920.810.590.370.270.260.270.300.340.380.430.490.560.650.760.911.191.682.513.744.835.145.405.696.136.737.548.479.4510.3811.1711.7712.3012.8713.4814.0014.6415.8817.0216.9416.5216.4216.2616.0114.6311.769.568.057.056.215.174.083.102.371.851.491.190.960.750.080.070.070.070.070.080.090.110.120.120.110.100.100.100.100.100.100.110.110.130.180.300.490.770.971.071.040.880.620.390.290.270.290.320.360.410.470.540.620.720.861.021.261.852.773.984.955.355.686.256.937.768.779.8811.0412.2413.2614.1414.8515.8517.0118.0719.0320.3921.7921.5921.1020.7719.8419.5417.6813.7110.939.047.786.845.764.533.442.642.071.651.331.080.840.050.050.050.050.060.060.070.080.090.090.090.080.090.090.090.090.100.110.120.140.200.350.610.961.221.321.241.000.660.430.300.280.310.350.390.450.510.600.690.810.961.151.401.852.944.265.115.756.437.388.509.7311.2012.6713.9515.3316.7517.7418.5219.6421.0722.1823.0324.9626.8625.8524.5623.3722.0422.0520.6816.2512.8110.248.447.306.134.853.722.882.271.821.461.190.940.740.040.040.040.040.050.050.060.070.070.070.070.070.080.080.080.090.100.110.130.160.240.430.791.251.581.671.501.130.740.440.300.310.330.370.420.490.560.660.780.921.101.321.612.032.884.355.626.847.999.5011.0612.9315.2017.5118.7819.5020.5122.0623.6025.0426.1027.0227.7129.3230.2227.0823.7919.0814.6311.459.047.656.445.153.993.112.461.971.591.301.050.830.040.040.040.040.040.040.050.050.060.060.060.060.070.070.080.090.110.130.150.190.280.521.061.662.042.101.791.280.780.450.330.320.350.400.460.530.610.730.871.061.291.581.982.553.414.956.928.8010.5612.3914.4316.5219.1221.8823.3023.8125.0826.7627.7228.0428.0528.5826.4221.5516.2612.839.747.976.725.474.273.342.642.121.711.401.140.910.720.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.050.060.060.070.070.080.100.120.150.190.230.330.691.482.252.662.582.091.390.810.450.310.330.370.420.480.560.660.790.961.181.481.872.403.164.356.178.6811.4313.7915.6717.9720.4122.8725.8128.1828.8028.9928.9727.8423.2317.6113.9610.428.206.895.734.563.592.842.261.831.491.220.980.780.030.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.050.060.060.070.090.110.140.180.230.310.450.952.083.103.413.072.351.500.820.450.330.340.380.440.500.590.710.871.091.411.842.433.194.155.447.209.5912.8216.2818.6720.6422.9524.7626.4923.8318.6014.5711.128.396.985.904.833.853.052.421.941.571.271.030.830.670.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.050.060.080.100.120.160.210.290.410.611.302.944.274.293.522.581.550.840.410.330.350.390.450.520.610.740.931.201.602.193.004.015.196.538.0510.0713.1517.7421.0322.0423.0518.9614.7911.498.557.056.025.064.123.292.592.051.631.321.080.880.710.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.070.080.100.140.180.260.370.550.811.744.045.615.224.022.801.580.850.440.330.350.400.460.530.630.770.961.251.702.413.394.585.836.998.2710.3313.2818.2223.0321.1219.0315.2911.808.777.146.095.204.343.522.752.141.701.371.130.930.760.600.020.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.070.090.110.150.210.290.440.671.022.235.236.956.194.532.921.620.860.420.330.350.390.450.540.660.811.031.341.832.583.604.796.057.178.4110.5413.6318.2623.9619.5219.0716.2912.529.317.406.255.344.503.632.842.221.761.441.190.980.800.640.030.030.030.040.040.050.070.090.110.160.220.310.460.711.142.445.807.596.634.763.001.670.880.410.330.350.390.450.550.690.861.101.431.902.593.514.715.957.148.3410.2113.7117.7423.5719.2517.3413.519.997.746.465.534.633.692.872.251.811.491.241.020.830.670.030.030.030.040.040.050.070.080.110.150.210.300.440.671.032.275.317.046.264.562.931.630.860.420.330.350.380.450.550.700.891.141.481.932.533.344.395.636.908.099.8513.2016.7322.2026.9118.9817.7914.4010.718.156.735.734.763.762.912.271.821.511.271.060.860.700.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.130.180.260.370.560.821.794.145.725.294.062.821.610.870.440.330.350.390.450.550.700.911.171.481.892.433.154.075.276.537.739.3512.2115.7020.1924.3118.8818.2215.1411.768.787.085.984.913.832.942.281.831.531.291.100.880.720.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.120.160.210.300.420.621.343.024.384.373.572.611.570.850.430.330.350.390.450.540.690.891.161.451.842.332.973.824.926.157.258.6611.2314.4717.9721.5019.3419.3716.3413.049.797.446.175.073.932.982.311.861.551.321.130.920.740.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.130.170.230.310.460.982.153.193.493.122.391.530.830.460.340.340.390.450.540.670.871.141.421.782.242.823.584.585.736.777.8910.0113.0016.2019.5021.3218.2414.3910.848.006.335.194.023.032.341.891.571.351.150.960.770.020.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.090.110.140.180.230.340.711.522.322.722.632.131.420.820.440.320.340.390.450.540.670.861.111.381.712.122.663.384.305.336.317.298.8411.6115.1018.3719.2323.4420.3615.6211.798.466.505.274.123.112.421.941.621.381.180.990.810.020.030.030.030.040.050.050.060.080.100.120.150.190.280.531.091.712.102.161.841.320.790.450.330.330.380.440.530.660.841.071.341.642.022.533.204.055.025.896.788.1210.4714.1217.7119.1424.5921.6916.6612.808.896.605.354.243.252.532.021.671.421.211.010.830.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.100.120.150.230.440.811.291.631.731.561.190.770.440.310.320.360.430.510.640.811.031.281.561.922.403.053.844.705.546.417.609.6913.0016.8318.9721.9217.2313.359.366.665.374.363.442.682.131.741.451.211.020.850.020.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.100.130.190.350.620.991.271.391.311.070.710.440.310.310.360.420.500.610.780.981.201.461.802.252.863.624.425.236.097.168.9311.9115.4918.4219.1520.9717.1213.149.666.685.354.433.622.882.281.821.471.201.010.860.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.060.070.090.120.160.290.490.781.001.131.120.980.700.440.320.310.340.400.480.590.740.921.121.361.662.082.633.314.094.935.826.828.2911.1414.4818.2820.6319.2616.7512.999.636.845.364.493.773.082.441.901.491.211.020.870.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.100.140.240.410.660.860.991.030.960.740.470.330.310.330.390.470.570.700.871.061.271.551.922.372.953.694.585.556.577.8810.6714.0318.1621.9717.4416.7913.669.997.125.474.563.893.232.561.971.541.241.050.890.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.130.210.350.580.780.931.010.990.810.540.360.320.320.380.450.540.660.821.001.211.461.752.122.623.304.165.186.217.469.9513.6717.6522.2716.8914.8710.907.625.694.683.993.312.591.991.551.261.070.910.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.120.190.310.520.740.921.051.070.940.670.440.340.320.370.430.520.630.780.951.151.361.611.912.342.933.744.765.796.979.0712.7216.5021.4224.4216.2715.3311.668.226.064.874.123.382.611.971.541.251.070.910.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.060.070.080.110.160.280.460.720.971.171.261.150.860.560.360.330.360.420.500.600.730.891.081.281.491.752.092.593.304.265.316.428.2111.3115.0119.4322.5615.9115.3912.139.006.535.174.303.492.631.961.511.231.050.900.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.110.150.260.430.741.091.401.551.451.120.720.440.350.360.410.480.570.680.821.001.201.391.611.902.322.923.784.825.847.259.9713.4416.7619.8716.0015.8612.8110.257.485.514.543.622.671.961.501.211.020.880.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.100.140.220.430.771.251.681.921.821.430.900.540.360.360.400.470.540.640.760.921.131.301.501.762.132.653.394.355.316.348.4711.6414.4217.5717.0514.2311.458.556.034.753.792.771.981.491.191.000.860.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.110.140.220.400.811.432.022.382.291.791.160.680.410.360.400.450.520.600.710.861.061.231.421.651.982.443.113.974.815.697.149.7812.9116.2116.7918.7415.8612.229.266.514.933.912.902.071.521.180.970.840.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.090.110.150.210.390.851.662.482.962.852.271.470.840.450.370.390.430.490.560.660.800.981.161.351.561.862.292.903.664.415.166.348.5311.9215.5116.4019.8717.0112.779.776.705.023.973.022.181.571.190.960.820.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.130.170.230.360.841.913.093.723.492.801.851.030.580.370.380.420.470.530.620.750.911.091.271.481.762.172.743.444.094.765.737.6210.7914.6516.3819.3517.2613.049.766.734.933.883.042.261.641.230.960.800.020.030.030.030.040.050.050.070.080.110.140.190.270.410.812.103.874.774.353.462.311.310.750.410.370.400.450.500.580.710.851.001.171.361.642.042.603.243.864.485.316.899.5913.0415.6716.5812.839.156.624.693.652.932.271.691.270.980.790.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.110.160.220.310.470.822.174.576.025.524.302.851.630.930.480.370.380.420.470.540.650.790.921.061.231.491.872.382.993.614.255.026.358.7611.6914.9716.6914.2214.8612.308.676.214.373.322.692.161.701.301.000.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.120.170.240.350.550.882.054.947.056.775.123.462.031.120.610.370.360.390.440.500.600.730.860.981.141.371.692.112.663.334.044.815.978.5011.3514.5417.6411.0910.5411.3511.5511.7212.2111.228.525.924.062.982.401.971.601.271.000.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.120.170.250.380.590.921.734.447.127.325.643.922.461.370.760.420.350.360.400.460.550.670.800.931.081.261.511.842.322.993.794.625.708.0511.2214.1217.939.049.059.5411.2111.5910.439.9710.009.759.789.788.075.613.762.662.091.721.421.150.020.030.030.040.040.060.070.090.130.180.250.370.560.841.363.195.926.695.453.992.771.660.930.510.350.340.380.430.510.620.740.871.011.161.341.602.012.623.464.385.377.3010.3913.1017.1519.809.368.968.678.478.318.288.379.5110.9710.539.478.938.458.127.936.865.113.392.351.791.461.221.010.030.030.040.040.050.070.090.120.170.240.330.480.700.981.873.895.144.863.842.871.931.120.630.370.330.360.400.470.570.680.810.941.061.201.411.742.273.084.044.996.478.9711.6715.3818.2910.6411.9410.488.768.307.967.707.597.547.517.888.809.058.507.877.326.766.185.494.483.222.051.521.221.020.030.030.030.040.050.070.090.110.150.200.270.380.520.681.042.263.553.843.472.812.041.290.760.460.340.340.370.430.510.610.730.860.961.081.251.521.982.713.644.535.627.5210.0012.9915.8315.0312.8811.9910.5210.5711.509.878.127.647.337.106.976.946.816.756.876.766.536.125.765.304.754.413.913.262.071.281.030.850.020.030.030.040.050.060.080.100.130.170.210.270.360.450.621.242.192.752.822.542.011.410.890.530.360.330.350.390.460.540.650.780.880.991.131.361.752.383.213.984.796.158.1910.5913.2512.9611.2610.399.8410.1710.769.007.527.016.836.636.516.406.255.995.655.244.924.604.384.163.943.883.693.132.111.250.860.030.030.040.040.050.070.080.100.130.160.200.250.310.390.691.291.852.112.081.821.400.970.630.420.340.330.360.420.480.580.720.800.901.021.211.562.112.793.414.024.956.568.6610.9210.879.669.149.079.278.947.636.706.436.316.186.055.915.705.384.914.454.103.853.713.673.693.773.702.891.911.210.780.020.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.100.130.160.190.220.260.420.761.191.511.621.541.301.000.690.490.370.330.340.380.440.530.640.740.820.921.101.391.842.392.883.303.955.237.058.949.038.288.087.897.546.866.155.845.785.745.675.605.455.204.844.394.023.713.543.463.513.623.683.602.711.711.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.100.120.140.160.190.270.470.751.051.221.221.140.970.770.570.420.350.330.360.410.490.580.670.740.840.991.251.622.042.392.703.134.065.547.017.376.856.646.255.705.224.954.945.055.155.195.185.074.814.444.053.753.493.373.323.363.453.433.182.511.600.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.080.100.110.120.140.200.300.460.710.890.970.990.940.850.710.550.400.340.340.370.450.530.600.670.760.901.121.421.721.962.172.473.074.175.205.575.295.084.724.394.174.164.264.404.574.714.774.704.464.163.813.553.333.213.153.153.173.062.732.151.440.020.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.090.100.110.150.210.320.480.660.800.880.920.910.840.690.510.400.340.350.410.480.550.610.690.811.011.221.421.581.721.912.273.234.094.274.124.033.853.733.633.683.803.924.114.284.344.234.083.863.583.353.153.012.902.822.762.632.311.760.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.070.080.090.110.150.230.340.500.660.800.900.980.980.900.700.510.370.340.380.440.500.560.630.740.881.021.151.261.351.471.722.663.553.813.763.703.593.473.433.423.493.613.733.863.863.733.593.413.233.052.872.722.592.452.312.141.830.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.060.070.080.090.110.170.250.380.540.710.891.061.191.170.980.720.470.380.370.410.460.520.580.660.750.840.931.001.061.141.342.153.003.543.783.683.553.393.283.243.253.333.403.393.323.223.072.902.772.642.492.352.222.061.891.710.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.060.070.080.090.130.180.290.420.640.911.201.451.521.351.010.650.430.370.390.430.480.530.580.630.690.750.790.830.891.031.602.273.033.583.553.443.263.113.033.023.043.022.932.812.662.522.402.292.172.041.921.811.661.500.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.060.060.070.080.110.140.220.360.560.921.341.721.921.801.390.930.560.400.380.400.440.470.500.530.570.600.630.660.700.821.141.592.363.043.213.152.972.842.762.702.652.572.472.322.172.031.931.841.731.631.531.430.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.060.070.080.100.130.180.280.500.901.462.022.402.351.921.300.800.460.370.380.400.410.430.450.470.490.510.540.570.660.821.101.732.292.572.662.592.462.382.332.222.122.001.881.741.631.541.451.351.260.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.060.060.070.090.110.150.240.410.841.542.352.943.002.561.801.090.660.400.360.360.370.380.390.400.410.430.450.460.520.610.781.231.631.922.072.102.031.961.901.791.691.581.481.381.301.211.131.060.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.110.140.200.350.701.552.693.593.773.302.501.560.930.500.360.330.330.330.340.340.350.360.370.390.430.470.570.861.111.351.551.601.591.541.491.411.311.231.151.081.010.940.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.110.150.200.300.591.402.944.424.844.293.382.201.290.770.390.320.300.300.300.300.300.310.320.330.350.380.440.610.760.911.081.161.201.191.130.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.120.160.220.310.511.152.845.086.225.684.403.011.801.040.570.330.280.270.270.260.270.270.270.280.300.310.350.450.540.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.090.120.160.230.330.520.932.355.207.196.965.433.812.461.440.810.430.280.250.240.230.230.240.240.240.250.260.280.340.400.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.090.120.160.230.340.550.871.684.116.847.425.974.303.031.941.130.640.350.240.220.210.210.210.210.210.220.230.240.270.310.340.030.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.110.160.230.340.530.791.242.484.916.175.684.393.282.371.520.900.510.300.220.190.180.180.180.190.190.190.200.230.250.270.020.030.030.030.040.040.050.070.080.110.150.220.310.450.650.911.322.624.124.564.033.292.551.791.150.690.390.230.190.170.160.160.160.170.170.180.190.210.220.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.140.200.260.360.490.650.781.212.203.013.112.872.441.891.340.880.540.330.220.170.150.150.150.150.150.160.170.180.190.190.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.100.120.170.210.270.340.420.490.611.061.712.102.182.051.761.391.010.670.430.270.180.150.140.130.130.140.140.140.150.160.160.020.030.030.040.040.050.060.080.100.130.160.200.240.280.320.360.520.881.271.511.571.481.271.030.800.560.380.230.160.140.130.120.120.130.130.130.130.140.140.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.090.100.120.140.170.200.210.230.290.430.710.971.121.141.080.980.860.730.550.340.200.150.120.120.110.120.120.120.120.120.120.120.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.110.120.140.150.160.180.250.410.560.750.860.910.920.900.840.720.520.320.210.130.120.110.110.110.110.110.100.100.110.020.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.070.080.100.110.110.120.120.160.240.330.480.640.760.850.920.950.910.760.520.320.160.120.110.110.110.100.100.090.090.090.090.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.070.070.080.090.090.090.110.140.220.320.460.630.790.941.081.161.070.820.510.270.140.110.110.100.100.090.080.080.080.080.030.030.030.040.040.050.050.060.060.070.070.070.070.080.100.150.220.330.500.720.991.261.461.451.210.790.440.200.130.110.100.100.090.080.080.080.070.070.020.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.050.060.060.060.070.080.100.150.240.390.651.031.441.781.891.691.200.720.360.160.120.110.100.090.080.070.070.070.070.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.050.050.060.070.080.120.160.310.561.021.592.132.422.271.771.080.610.270.140.110.100.090.080.070.060.060.060.060.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.040.050.050.050.060.070.100.140.230.470.941.702.493.012.972.451.650.940.480.200.130.110.090.080.070.060.060.060.050.020.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.060.070.090.120.190.360.801.722.873.733.793.272.411.440.800.370.160.110.090.080.070.060.060.050.050.050.020.020.030.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.050.060.070.090.130.180.280.631.543.144.624.954.373.372.161.260.650.270.130.100.080.070.060.060.050.050.040.040.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.050.060.070.100.130.190.280.511.192.975.246.405.834.493.031.841.010.520.210.110.080.070.060.050.050.040.040.040.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.100.140.200.310.490.912.355.177.217.065.513.912.551.510.820.400.170.090.070.060.050.050.040.040.040.030.020.020.020.030.030.030.040.050.060.070.100.140.200.310.510.821.563.836.527.205.894.323.092.071.220.660.300.130.080.060.050.040.040.040.030.030.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.040.050.070.090.130.200.300.480.731.142.114.245.635.444.363.302.431.620.950.490.220.090.060.040.040.040.030.030.030.020.020.020.030.030.030.040.050.070.090.130.180.270.400.580.811.112.063.414.063.753.172.531.861.230.720.370.160.080.050.040.030.030.030.030.030.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.060.080.120.170.230.320.430.560.670.901.672.432.692.582.261.821.330.860.480.230.110.060.040.030.030.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.060.070.100.140.180.230.290.350.410.460.721.241.671.811.761.561.250.900.570.310.140.060.040.030.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.060.080.110.130.160.190.230.260.270.320.540.901.151.251.191.020.800.580.370.200.090.040.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.070.080.100.110.130.150.170.170.190.280.460.640.790.820.760.650.510.380.240.130.060.030.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.100.110.110.120.160.230.340.460.530.540.490.420.330.230.150.080.050.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.050.050.060.070.070.080.080.080.090.110.190.240.330.370.360.310.250.190.140.090.050.030.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.040.040.040.050.050.050.050.050.060.070.100.140.190.240.240.210.180.140.110.080.050.030.020.020.020.010.020.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.040.040.040.040.040.040.050.050.080.100.140.150.140.120.100.070.050.040.030.030.020.020.010.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.030.050.060.070.090.090.080.060.050.040.030.030.020.020.020.010.010.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.040.040.050.060.050.040.030.030.020.020.020.020.010.010.010.010.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.030.030.030.030.020.020.020.020.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.020.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.020.020.020.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.0125.7026.6827.0228.7032.7431.9530.7030.4029.5728.5528.5229.5230.3830.6931.8632.8528.8827.0926.7625.7428.7128.7027.8327.4430.8730.2528.7129.0429.0428.3028.2829.0029.0528.7130.1831.0127.5227.8228.7628.7130.9730.2928.0225.7128.3527.8426.0426.7727.7228.2428.2827.7626.8126.0127.7328.4625.7427.8930.3130.9631.0131.1628.7324.9425.9724.7422.9524.1626.9630.1730.2427.1424.2222.9524.6526.0424.9028.6131.2031.0428.3228.8228.0726.1927.8425.9224.3225.4927.5429.5229.6027.6925.5824.3625.8427.8526.2327.9928.9028.3424.6124.3923.5823.7426.0023.8622.8123.3523.7223.9823.9623.7323.3622.8123.7926.0123.8023.5724.4424.6321.6221.4521.2622.4523.0620.5920.0620.6420.9921.1321.1321.0020.6520.0720.5423.0022.5421.2821.4821.6220.0720.3320.7821.8621.1919.5119.3519.6819.8219.7719.7719.8219.6919.3619.4921.1621.9020.8020.3520.1019.8520.2520.4620.2919.3918.7118.7018.8018.8218.6418.6318.8118.8018.7218.7119.3620.3020.4820.2719.8819.3519.7219.9719.9218.9018.0617.9417.9317.8817.7517.7517.8817.9417.9518.0518.8819.9119.9919.7519.3818.8318.9819.3420.4219.5917.4416.9917.0517.0817.0917.0917.0917.0517.0117.4219.5420.4719.3819.0018.8519.9319.3818.6819.4919.9217.2216.1416.2316.4216.5616.5616.4316.2516.1517.1719.9019.5618.7119.3819.9222.2721.0919.1018.0719.5917.0915.5215.5915.7916.0616.0715.8115.6015.5217.0119.6318.1319.0621.0822.2124.6822.6219.9017.1918.7516.9314.9014.9515.1715.4315.4315.1814.9614.8916.8418.8017.1619.8022.6224.6026.0323.2720.0816.6717.9716.5614.2814.3314.6214.8214.8314.6414.3314.2616.4718.0316.6719.9623.2525.9225.3822.6319.4216.0417.3415.9513.6813.7213.9614.2514.2513.9713.7213.6715.8617.4016.0419.3122.6125.2822.7420.6317.9415.3316.9915.1013.1113.1613.3313.5813.5813.3413.1613.0915.0017.0215.3317.8620.6222.6719.4918.1816.1815.3116.7814.1812.6112.6812.8312.9612.9612.8412.6912.6114.1016.8115.3416.1318.1919.4617.0716.2915.4516.0516.1713.3412.3112.2812.3012.3812.3812.3112.2912.3113.3016.1516.1415.4816.3517.1016.5116.3216.1416.5215.0812.8312.1712.0311.9511.8911.8911.9512.0312.1812.8215.0716.6016.2116.4016.6216.6316.7616.7116.2114.3512.4711.9811.8311.7411.5511.5411.7311.8312.0012.4814.3416.2816.8016.8416.7216.1215.8915.7415.9914.5512.3611.6811.5611.4711.4211.4211.4711.5611.6912.3414.5616.0515.7815.9516.2016.0715.2714.4315.0015.1212.3511.3011.2811.2911.3711.3711.3011.2911.3012.3015.0915.0614.4215.3016.1117.7316.3614.4513.6215.1312.5510.9911.0711.2111.3311.3311.2211.0810.9912.4615.1313.6314.4016.4217.7620.1918.0415.4712.8814.5912.7810.7510.7810.9611.2111.2110.9810.7810.7212.6614.6112.8915.3718.0620.1321.8819.1716.1412.8014.0812.8110.4510.4010.5610.8510.8610.5810.3910.4112.6514.1512.7615.9619.1421.7621.6418.9215.9412.5313.7712.5110.099.9610.0410.1510.1510.059.9510.0312.3313.8512.4415.7118.8521.4119.4217.4114.8612.1213.5711.859.619.419.329.319.319.329.399.5611.6813.6712.0414.6317.3119.16CRICKET BATTING CAGE_WorkplaneXBXBXBXBXBXBXBXB6.566.005.104.169.029.159.118.979.018.517.356.0711.3111.3011.4812.0412.4012.3712.3712.3612.4411.799.747.8712.3012.8713.4814.0014.6415.8817.0216.9416.5216.4216.2616.0114.6311.769.5611.0412.2413.2614.1414.8515.8517.0118.0719.0320.3921.7921.5921.1020.7719.8419.5417.6813.7110.939.048.509.7311.2012.6713.9515.3316.7517.7418.5219.6421.0722.1823.0324.9626.8625.8524.5623.3722.0422.0520.6816.2512.8110.245.626.847.999.5011.0612.9315.2017.5118.7819.5020.5122.0623.6025.0426.1027.0227.7129.3230.2227.0823.7919.0814.6311.452.553.414.956.928.8010.5612.3914.4316.5219.1221.8823.3023.8125.0826.7627.7228.0428.0528.5826.4221.5516.2612.839.743.164.356.178.6811.4313.7915.6717.9720.4122.8725.8128.1828.8028.9928.9727.8423.2317.6113.9610.424.155.447.209.5912.8216.2818.6720.6422.9524.7626.4923.8318.6014.5711.126.538.0510.0713.1517.7421.0322.0423.0518.9614.7911.496.998.2710.3313.2818.2223.0321.1219.0315.2911.808.777.178.4110.5413.6318.2623.9619.5219.0716.2912.529.318.3410.2113.7117.7423.5719.2517.3413.519.998.099.8513.2016.7322.2026.9118.9817.7914.4010.717.739.3512.2115.7020.1924.3118.8818.2215.1411.768.787.258.6611.2314.4717.9721.5019.3419.3716.3413.049.797.8910.0113.0016.2019.5021.3218.2414.3910.847.298.8411.6115.1018.3719.2323.4420.3615.6211.796.788.1210.4714.1217.7119.1424.5921.6916.6612.808.896.417.609.6913.0016.8318.9721.9217.2313.359.367.168.9311.9115.4918.4219.1520.9717.1213.149.666.828.2911.1414.4818.2820.6319.2616.7512.999.636.846.577.8810.6714.0318.1621.9717.4416.7913.669.997.126.217.469.9513.6717.6522.2716.8914.8710.907.626.979.0712.7216.5021.4224.4216.2715.3311.668.226.428.2111.3115.0119.4322.5615.9115.3912.139.006.535.847.259.9713.4416.7619.8716.0015.8612.8110.257.486.348.4711.6414.4217.5717.0514.2311.458.555.697.149.7812.9116.2116.7918.7415.8612.229.265.166.348.5311.9215.5116.4019.8717.0112.779.776.704.765.737.6210.7914.6516.3819.3517.2613.049.766.735.316.899.5913.0415.6716.5812.839.156.625.026.358.7611.6914.9716.6914.2214.8612.308.676.214.815.978.5011.3514.5417.6411.0910.5411.3511.5511.7212.2111.228.525.924.064.625.708.0511.2214.1217.939.049.059.5411.2111.5910.439.9710.009.759.789.788.075.613.765.377.3010.3913.1017.1519.809.368.968.678.478.318.288.379.5110.9710.539.478.938.458.127.934.996.478.9711.6715.3818.2910.6411.9410.488.768.307.967.707.597.547.517.888.809.058.504.535.627.5210.0012.9915.8315.0312.8811.9910.5210.5711.509.878.127.647.337.106.976.946.813.984.796.158.1910.5913.2512.9611.2610.399.8410.1710.769.007.527.016.836.634.024.956.568.6610.9210.879.669.149.079.278.947.633.303.955.237.058.949.038.288.082.703.134.065.5425.7026.6827.0228.7032.7431.9530.7030.4029.5728.5528.5229.5230.3830.6931.8632.8528.8827.0926.7625.7428.7128.7027.8327.4430.8730.2528.7129.0429.0428.3028.2829.0029.0528.7130.1831.0127.5227.8228.7628.7130.9730.2928.0225.7128.3527.8426.0426.7727.7228.2428.2827.7626.8126.0127.7328.4625.7427.8930.3130.9631.0131.1628.7324.9425.9724.7422.9524.1626.9630.1730.2427.1424.2222.9524.6526.0424.9028.6131.2031.0428.3228.8228.0726.1927.8425.9224.3225.4927.5429.5229.6027.6925.5824.3625.8427.8526.2327.9928.9028.3424.6124.3923.5823.7426.0023.8622.8123.3523.7223.9823.9623.7323.3622.8123.7926.0123.8023.5724.4424.6321.6221.4521.2622.4523.0620.5920.0620.6420.9921.1321.1321.0020.6520.0720.5423.0022.5421.2821.4821.6220.0720.3320.7821.8621.1919.5119.3519.6819.8219.7719.7719.8219.6919.3619.4921.1621.9020.8020.3520.1019.8520.2520.4620.2919.3918.7118.7018.8018.8218.6418.6318.8118.8018.7218.7119.3620.3020.4820.2719.8819.3519.7219.9719.9218.9018.0617.9417.9317.8817.7517.7517.8817.9417.9518.0518.8819.9119.9919.7519.3818.8318.9819.3420.4219.5917.4416.9917.0517.0817.0917.0917.0917.0517.0117.4219.5420.4719.3819.0018.8519.9319.3818.6819.4919.9217.2216.1416.2316.4216.5616.5616.4316.2516.1517.1719.9019.5618.7119.3819.9222.2721.0919.1018.0719.5917.0915.5215.5915.7916.0616.0715.8115.6015.5217.0119.6318.1319.0621.0822.2124.6822.6219.9017.1918.7516.9314.9014.9515.1715.4315.4315.1814.9614.8916.8418.8017.1619.8022.6224.6026.0323.2720.0816.6717.9716.5614.2814.3314.6214.8214.8314.6414.3314.2616.4718.0316.6719.9623.2525.9225.3822.6319.4216.0417.3415.9513.6813.7213.9614.2514.2513.9713.7213.6715.8617.4016.0419.3122.6125.2822.7420.6317.9415.3316.9915.1013.1113.1613.3313.5813.5813.3413.1613.0915.0017.0215.3317.8620.6222.6719.4918.1816.1815.3116.7814.1812.6112.6812.8312.9612.9612.8412.6912.6114.1016.8115.3416.1318.1919.4617.0716.2915.4516.0516.1713.3412.3112.2812.3012.3812.3812.3112.2912.3113.3016.1516.1415.4816.3517.1016.5116.3216.1416.5215.0812.8312.1712.0311.9511.8911.8911.9512.0312.1812.8215.0716.6016.2116.4016.6216.6316.7616.7116.2114.3512.4711.9811.8311.7411.5511.5411.7311.8312.0012.4814.3416.2816.8016.8416.7216.1215.8915.7415.9914.5512.3611.6811.5611.4711.4211.4211.4711.5611.6912.3414.5616.0515.7815.9516.2016.0715.2714.4315.0015.1212.3511.3011.2811.2911.3711.3711.3011.2911.3012.3015.0915.0614.4215.3016.1117.7316.3614.4513.6215.1312.5510.9911.0711.2111.3311.3311.2211.0810.9912.4615.1313.6314.4016.4217.7620.1918.0415.4712.8814.5912.7810.7510.7810.9611.2111.2110.9810.7810.7212.6614.6112.8915.3718.0620.1321.8819.1716.1412.8014.0812.8110.4510.4010.5610.8510.8610.5810.3910.4112.6514.1512.7615.9619.1421.7621.6418.9215.9412.5313.7712.5110.099.9610.0410.1510.1510.059.9510.0312.3313.8512.4415.7118.8521.4119.4217.4114.8612.1213.5711.859.619.419.329.319.319.329.399.5611.6813.6712.0414.6317.3119.16ASSOCIATED LIGHTING REPRESENTATIVES, INC7777 PARDEE LANEP.O. BOX 2265OAKLAND, CA 94621PHONE: (510) 638-3800 - FAX (510) 638-2908* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *ALL VALUES SHOWN ARE MAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES AT GRADEPHOTOMETRIC DATA USED AS INPUT FOR THESE CALCULATIONSIS BASED ON ESTABLISHED IES PROCEDURES AND PUBLISHEDLAMP, RATINGS. FIELD PERFORMANCE WILL DEPEND ON ACTUALLAMP, BALLAST, ELECTRICAL AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS.Calculations have been performed according to IES standards and good practice.Some differences between measured values and calculated results may occur due tomeasurement techniques and field conditions such as voltage and temperaturevariations. Input data used to generate the attached calculations such as roomdimensions, reflectances, furniture and architectural elements significantly affect thelighting calculations. If the real environment conditions do not match the input data,differences will occur between measured values and calculated values.REPORT FOR: AURUM CONSULTING ENGINEERSBY: APPLICATIONS ENGINEERING; GILBERTO J. RODRIGUEZSALES REPRESENTATIVE: ALR; JD STEPHENSAGI32 VERSION 19.11AGI (C) 1999-2020 LIGHTING ANALYSTS, INC.10268 W. CENTENNIAL ROAD, SUITE 202LITTLETON, CO 80127FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 34605 LOCKHART ST. DUBLIN CADRAWING NO. / INPUT FILEPROJECT DESCRIPTION17734JDS - E2.2N.DWG /.AGISCALEAS NOTEDSHEET2 OF 2DATE02.21.2020REV0**PARTIAL SITE**1" = 16'1" = 8'1.0FC0.5FC***LIGHTING LAYOUT RECOMMENDATION**** TWIN ROTATED ASSEMBLIES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.** HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLE VALUES SHOWN AT 36" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.Luminaire ScheduleProject: FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 - PARTIAL SITESymbolQtyLabelArrangementLum. LumensLLFLDDLLDDescriptionFilenameLum. Watts6XASINGLE66520.8500.9000.944SIGNIFY GARDCO GL13-XXX-1-2-70LA-6435-NW-VOLT-XXX - 15' POLEGL13-2-70LA-6435-NW.IES706XA1SINGLE67500.8500.9000.944SIGNIFY GARDCO GL13-XXX-1-3-70LA-6435-NW-VOLT-XXX - 15' POLEGL13-3-70LA-6435-NW.IES70.18XB *TWIN274320.8500.9000.944VISIONAIRE BLX-II-4-T4-128LC-5-4K-VOLT-XX-XX-(TWIN) - 25' POLEBLX-II_4_T4_128LC_5_4K.IES211Calculation SummaryProject: FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 - PARTIAL SITELabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/Min# PtsCRICKET BATTING CAGE_Workplane **IlluminanceFc18.5632.859.311.993.53560PATHWAY AIlluminanceFc2.575.010.882.925.69238PATHWAY BIlluminanceFc3.027.730.634.7912.27263 Dublin, California LITTLE LEAGUE LITTLE LEAGUE PLAY AREA WITH ADJACENT SEATING SCORE KEEPING BOOTHS NEW WALKS BATTING CAGES WITH TURF LAWN SAND VOLLEYBALL COURTS CRICKET FIELD CONCRETE TERRACE SEATING 3–PITCHES SIGHT SCREEN SIGHT SCREEN Fallon Sports Park - Phase 3 Concept Plan BATTING CAGE LIGHTING: 25' HIGH POLE LIGHTS 5/29/2020 r \\..w rr.4 -3 FALLON SPORTS PARK 4 DUBLIN. CALIFORNIA 1 CARDUCCI & ASS• TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY If. INTRODUCTION fll, MASTER PLAN PROGRAM IV. SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS V. PROCESS VI. MASTER PLAN DESIGN COMPONENTS VII. PHASING VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IX. APPENDICES a. Task Force Meeting Agenda b. Task Force Meeting Minutes c. Task Force Design Concepts d. Task Force Meeting Handouts e. Irrigation and Recycled Water Demand Analysis f. Cost Estimate (ARDUCC) & ApOCI,4TES INC r SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FALLOR SPORTS PARK DU LINt CALIFORNIA SECTiON I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2004 the City of Dublin included funding for development of the Master Plan for the 60-acre Fallon Sports Park. This Master Plan Report outlines the desires, intentions, and objectives of the City of Dublin for the development of Fallon Sports Park. The basis for the programming of the 60-acre sports park is the "City of Dublin: Parks and Recreation Master Plan, March 2004 Update" (PRMP) which was developed to assure the future development of parks throughout the City. The PRMP identified this 60-acre parcel on Fallon Road in eastern Dublin as a "park facility developed to accommodate the majority of competition ball fields in the City".' As part of the master plan process the Fallon Sports Park project was initiated in March of 2004 and the City Council appointed a 22-person Task Force, to represent the interests of particular groups, users, and residents. The program for the Fallon Sports Park as contained in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan includes the following amenities: baseball fields, soccer fields, softball fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, BMX track, children's play area, jogging or walking loop, fam- - ily and group picnic areas, shade structures, restrooms, concession/ scoreboard areas, lighting for sports fields and parking lots. Through input received from the Fallon Sports Park Task Force additional amenities have been identified including bocce ball courts, cricket fields, and water play areas. The Sports Park will also create link- ages to adjacent open space, establish a focal element for the Dublin Community, and provide competition sports fields for tournament play. Throughout the design process the Task Force has taken part to help assure the Master Plan's acceptance by City residents and its relevance with current trends and future demands, MASTER PLANNING DESIGN PROCESS The Design Team worked closely with the Task Force members to incorporate their participation in the design process. The meetings allowed the participants to guide the design and have a primary role in the decision -making process. The Task Force members were included in a series of six meetings which were held to solicit input into the process. They included an Introductory Meeting - outlining the parameters of the program and the physical make up of the site; a Site Visit - where the task force members actually hiked the site and gained a sense of the scale of the project; Design Meeting #1 - where the task force prepared a series of potential layouts for the park; Design Meeting #2 - took the potential layouts and refined them to six viable plans and the task force narrowed these down to three options to be refined further; Design Meefing #3 - the three refined plans were presented and a preferred alternative was selected; De- sign Meeting #4 - the preferred alternative and phasing plans were --- presented to the Task Force for approval and recommendation to the Parks and Community Services Commission; and Design Meeting #5 - discussed the comments and recommended changes from the Parks Commission and asked for direction from the Task Force. 1. "city of Dublin: Parks and Recreation Master Plan, March 2004 Update," (March 2004): 50. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Existing aerial photo Site views Site views of hillside and distance Task Force introduction Meeting (04/28/2004). Design Meeting #1 Design Meeting #2 FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA SECTION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In June of 2004 the Parks & Community Services Commission was presented the three master plan alternatives and the preferred scheme of the Task Force. The Commission selected Scheme B as the preferred design with the recommendation that the design be referred back to the Task Force to reevaluate the space requirements of the two 90' baseball diamonds and to consider removal of the baseball diamonds to allow for program flexibility in the future. Staff returned to the Task Force and looked at options for the base- '" ball field area which included a revised Master Plan with updated engineering information. The updated engineering information adjusted the grades leaving space for only one 90' baseball field and —• reconfigured the parking to allow for access per Traffic Engineer- ing requirements. The Task Force was in favor of retaining one 90' baseball field in the plan. This is supported by the standards for baseball fields in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan which shows the need for two additional 90' baseball fields within the City. As the Parks and Recreation Master Plan designated both 90' baseball fields for the Fallon Sports Park, it would be necessary to identify — another location for the remaining 90' baseball field in order to meet the standards for City build -out. The Final Draft Master Plan was presented to the Parks and Com- munity Services Commission at the June 2005 meeting. The Com- mission received the presentation and public comment, including comments from Task Force members. The Commission deliberated on elements of the plan and commented on the baseball field and the option of removing it from the plan. The discussion included the overall programming requirements of the Parks and Recreation -- Master Plan and limitations for future locations should the field be removed. Further, the Master Plan is meant as a template and simi- lar to other master planned parks it is flexible given future recreation needs. Upon completion of deliberations the Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Master Plan, as present- ed to the City Council. The Final Draft Fallon Sports Park Master Plan was presented to the City Council. The City Council was in favor of the majority of the design elements in the overall Master Plan. The City Council dis- -- cussed the need for flexibility for future recreation needs and chose to eliminate the remaining 90-foot baseball field and leave the space open as a future study area. The Final Master Plan and cost estimates have been revised to re- flect these changes. The Master Plan follows the Executive Summa- ry and the cost estimates are included in the Appendix of this report. DESIGN ELEMENTS Based on input received from the Task Force and Parks and Com- - munity Services Commission meetings, a final list of park elements was developed to incorporate into the park. These elements are listed on the following page: CARDL1CCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Master plan with future study area Baseball Basketball FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA 1-2 SECTION I, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sport Facilities • 4-60' Little League fields • 4 softball fields (2 lighted) • 4 soccer fields (2 lighted) 2 natural turf fields with a cricket field overlay 2 natural turf fields with synthetic turf option • 4 tennis courts (lighted) • 4 basketball courts (lighted) • 4 bocce courts (lighted) • 2 additional courts optional (lighted) • 4 sand volleyball courts • BMX course Other Park Facilities • Activity hubs/staff offices (200-300 sf) • Restrooms • Concessions • Picnic plazas • Play areas • Art and water features (optional) • Loop jogging trail (one mile) • Family picnic areas with barbecues • On -site parking for 459 cars (259 upper terrace parking spaces, and 200 lower terrace parking spaces) • Lockable bicycle parking distributed throughout the park • Shade structures Sport Field Lighting • 2 softball fields • 2 soccer fields • 4 tennis courts • 4 basketball courts • 4 bocce courts • 2 additional bocce courts optional Other Lighted Facilities • Vehicular entry lighting • Parking lot lighting • Pathway lighting • Security lighting • Arrival/Drop-off lighting • Activity hub lighting • Pedestrian bridge lighting SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site has an overall elevation change of approximately 100 feet, from the Fallon RoadlGleason Drive intersection (+1-490 feet) to the Lockhart Street/Central Parkway inter- section (+/-390 feet). This 100-foot drop occurs over a length of 2,500 feet, creating an overall 4% slope across the site; it should be noted that much of the site exceeds 5%, which is considered to be the maximum slope for park usability. The site is bordered to the north and northwest by housing devel- CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATE:S", INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA' Pedestrian circulation Site Visit (05101/04) FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA 1-3 SECTION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IP opments and a golf course. To the south and east, additional housing and a school site are planned for future development. On the west- ern edge of the park and parallel to Lockhart Street is a continuous 70-foot-wide stream corridor that is being developed for environmen- tal mitigation purposes. This stream corridor defines this western and — northwestern edge of the park and will be reinforced with a series of riparian zone plantings. City of Dublin Fire Station #18 is located along Fallon Road approximately 20 to 30 feet higher than the park's existing finish grade and is supported by a large retaining wall. The overall site topography consists of roiling hills with two small val- leys that create drainage channels across the site from its northern to southwestern boundary. The grass -covered, treeless rolling hills create attractive views to the east and to the south. The prevailing western winds often dominate the park environment. The existing soil is classified as being predominately of the Tassajara formation characterized by a high -clay content and poor drainage. GRADING CONCEPT In order to create usable, level surfaces for the facilities, and to — accept .5 million to 1 million cubic yards of fill from adjacent devel- opments, two main terraces (upper and lower) have been created. These terraces create a dramatic grade change of 30 feet between each level and significant embankments at the northwest and south- west corners of the park. These terraces provide many opportunities for views and topographic interest throughout the park. The terracing also allows for two main vehicular entries, one off of Lockhart Street at the upper level on the western edge of the park, and the second off of Central Parkway on the southern edge of the lower level. SITE DRAINAGE All site drainage will connect to the perimeter storrn drainage system running along Fallon Road and Central Parkway. Each field, hub, — and parking lot will serve as its own watershed and will connect to the perimeter storm drainage system. Further, each terrace will be a closed drainage system that directs all water into the storm drainage system. No park drainage will enter the stream corridor, which will be controlled and maintained by the Home Owners' Association from the adjacent residential development. The stream corridor is only meant to accept drainage from northerly developments and is intended to be a wildlife corridor as it runs along the sports park. PARK FEATURES The park is designed to include memorable identification features and signage clearly directing visitors to specific facilities. Fallon Sports Park will be an identifiable and memorable park through the use of a ranch theme. This theme is exemplified by the split -rail -style — fencing running the perimeter of the park and large, traditional "ranch gates" at the two main entrances. Other park elements such as play areas, trellis, and restrooms will incorporate colors and elements that reinforce the ranch theme. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA r Site Characteristics Grading Plan (Red lines indicate contour lines) FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA SECTION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Activity hubs, located at the end of the entry drives and at the heart of each terrace, will create a sense of place and arrival. in addition, a series of sport and activity hubs will organize uses throughout the park. The circulation system will provide accessible paths throughout the park connecting the park facilities and providing neighborhood access. These neighborhood connections will link the park to the 4 F- = , - surrounding areas so that residents can easily walk to the park. The __ multiuse trail, located within the stream corridor, links the park to the Tassajara bike trail via the continuation of the stream corridor north along Fallon Road and south along the proposed extension of Lock- hart Street across Central Parkway. Sports facilities will be lighted to allow for tournament play and safety at night. Park hours will be dawn to dusk and lighted facilities will be open and lighted until 10 p.m. -- PHASING The park will be divided into Phase 1, and Subsequent Phases to be subdivided in the future. Phase 1 will follow the development of Lockhart Street giving the park vehicular access for the upper ter- race where a variety of facilities will be constructed. The Subsequent Phases will be subdivided in the future and will provide uses that remain current with budgeting, community use demands, and sur- rounding road development. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 4OCKRART STREET r IA la' r:f 1 la' PATTI s1.4EE SLOPE 70 WIDE r CORRIDOR Stream corridor at ripper terrace erray Existing stream corridor along Fallon Road Dublin Ranch entry Fencing at Fire Station #18 Existing ranch fencing 1 FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA I - 5 SECTION ll. INTRODUCTION The Master Plan is intended to guide the park development by defining the goals and establishing the design elements to be used at the Fallon Sports Park. The park is a 60-acre parcel located in the fast-growing eastern portion of Dublin. It was identified in the PRMP to contain the majority of competition sports fields; the PRMP lays the framework for all future park development in Dublin and has identified the need for 299.5 acres of land for public park use at build -out of the City. In addition, the City of Dublin will protect existing open space and provide _ linkages through trails, streets, and bikeways to connect these parks and open space resources. Fallon Sports Park has been identified as the site to provide the core of competition sports fields to serve the communitywide recreation needs in the City of Dublin. Master Plan Goals Seven major goals were established to lead the Master Plan. These goals are as follows: 1. Create a focal and destination point in the City of Dublin, and create a regional attraction that welcomes users from surrounding communities. 2. Create a premier sports park with a wide range of fields and courts to be used for competitive and tournament play. 3. Provide lighted facilities for extended use and tournament play. Position lighted facilities in the center of the park to reduce glare impact on surrounding neighborhoods. — 4. Develop the park adjacent to the 70-foot-wide (4-acre) stream corridor so that the park and the stream corridor complement each other and provide a large open space resource. 5. Provide a park like experience and recreational opportunities for non -sport users, such as picnic, play, walking trails, relaxation, etc. Promote nature appreciation through native plantings, stream corridor interaction, distant views, and open space connections. 6. Provide linkages to the regional bike system, other parks within the City, neighborhoods, and the adjacent private open space. 7. Create a clear traffic pattern with descriptive signage to allow visiting teams and out-of-town users ease in finding the site. In addition, provide clear descriptive signage giving directions to specific facilities on site. 2. "City of Dublin: Parks and Recreatlon Master Plan„ March 2004 Update.' (March 2004): 23. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC 5AN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Site location map - Dublin Ranch Ma-d. Panrcacrm„.,Ey AMA _ µ .74 .sue c ..vw-...,rw Dublin Ranch future development location map (Courtesy of MacKay & Somps) FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA SECTION III. MASTER PLAN PROGRAM Enkim The City appointed a 22-person Task Force, representing the interests of particular groups, users, and residents, to help guide and give input -- for the Master Plan design process. Through the Master Planning process the original list of proposed park elements and components, as specified in the PRMP, has been adjusted. The following list of site elements and components will be integrated into the park. SPORT FACILITIES • 4-60' Little League fields • 4 softball fields (2 lighted) • 4 soccer fields (2 lighted) 2 natural turf fields with a cricket field overlay 2 natural turf fields with synthetic turf option ▪ 1-90' baseball field (lighted) • 4 tennis courts (lighted) • 4 basketball courts (lighted) • 4 bocce courts (lighted) 2 additional bocce courts optional (lighted) • 4 sand volleyball courts • BMX course OTHER PARK FACILITIES • Activity hubs • Restrooms • Concessions • Picnic plazas • Play areas • Art and water features (optional) • Loop jogging trail (one mile) — • Family picnic areas with barbecue • On -site parking for 459 cars (259 upper terrace parking spaces, 200 lower terrace parking spaces) • Lockable bicycle parking distributed throughout the park • Shade structures SPORT FIELD LIGHTING — • 1 baseball field • 2 softball fields • 2 soccer fields — • 4 tennis courts • 4 basketball courts • 4 bocce courts 2 additional bocce courts optional OTHER LIGHTED FACILITIES • Vehicular entry lighting • Parking lot lighting • Pathway lighting • Security lighting • Arrival/Drop-off lighting • Activity hub lighting ▪ Pedestrian bridge lighting CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Task Force Meeting (06/t 8/04) Little League BMX course Cricket field Lighted baseball field FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA SECTION IV. SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS This 60-acre parcel is located approximately 1,4 mile north of 1-580 along the western edge of Fallon Road. Fallon Road, Gleason Drive, Lockhart Street, and Central Parkway will define the park boundary. Currently, residential developments and a golf course exist to the north and there are proposed residential developments to the west and to the south of the park. In addition, an elementary school is slated for development across from the park along Lockhart Street on the westem edge of the site. The site's major landmark is City of Dublin Fire Station #18, which is positioned along the park's border on Fallon Road with a 20- to 30- foot-tall retaining wall on its eastern edge. Otherwise, the topography embodies the classical Northern Californian rolling hills. Natural waterways and drainage channels cross the site from the northeast to southwest. The site has significant grade changes with a 100-foot vertical drop over a 2,500-foot horizontal distance from the most northerly point at the Fallon Road/Gleason Drive intersection to the most southerly point at the Lockhart Street/Central Parkway intersection. This grade change results in an overall slope of 4%. The existing soil -- is classified as being predominately of the Tassajara formation, which is characterized by a high clay content and poor drainage. The stream corridor is being constructed by the developer of the adjacent housing project as part of the mitigation of environmental impacts from the surrounding developments. The existing stream corridor will enter the park site at the Gleason Drive/Fallon Road intersection and continue along the western border of the site parallel to Lockhart Street. There are strict design guidelines for the stream corridor. It will be 70 feet wide and will incorporate a multi -use trail along its western edge. The streambed will have a 15-foot-wide flat bottom and 3H:1V (Horizontal: Vertical) maximum -sloped sides. It will be planted with a mixture of native grasses, trees and shrubs. No park drainage will enter this stream corridor along the western edge of Fallon Sports Park. Fast view of Liar; ili'!S CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISC©. CALIFORNIA 111,12,1, c LEGEND M Medium Density Residential MH Medium High Density Residential ES Elementary Scholl MS Middle School L Low tensity Residential OS + Space NP Neighborhood Pam NS Neighborhood Square NC Neighborhood Connection RRA Rural Residential Agricultural PISP Pub& Semi -Public GC General Commercial CO Canmercial alfce Existing Flee Station #18 Soulhh view of the mrlrntains , fLL3AD ;' i Dublin Ranch future de- velopment Location map (Courtesy of MacKay & Soups) FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA IV-1 SECTION IV. SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS HYDROLOGY — — SWALE RIDGE Wind Speeds (Calm: 7.5%) C,k.s OS,A 1,51.9 104.9 5Af.9 3612 Gti'd Ca4ri 5.5-1A C5.I.4 0.5•1.4 0.5.1.1 O.S-fA I+41ti0 CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SOLSTICE: SHORTEST DAYS N $ TOPOGRAPHY SLOPES $% OR GREATER iP 416l {El SPOT ELEVATIONS a17.]x PROPOSED ROAD SPOT ELEVATIONS EQUINOX: SOLSTICE: DAY = NIGHT LONGEST DAYS N N rieT)W E S S MARCH JUNE HIGHEST SUN ALTfTUDE EQUINOX: DAY = NIGHT SEPTEMBER DECEMBER LOWEST SLIM ALTITUDE GEOLOGY ARTIFIC AL FILL LANDSLIDE DEBRIS / COLLUVIUM ALLUVIUM Y TASSALARA FORMATION lA BORING LOCATION WIND/SUN Existing site conditions PREVAILING WIND FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA 1V-2 SECTION V. PROCESS The Design Team worked closely with the Task Force members to gamer extensive input into the design process. This Master Planning resulted in an accurate assessment of the community's needs and a prioritization of facilities that offer the highest value to the entire community while appealing to all ages of Dublin residents. TASK FORCE MEETINGS During the course of the project, seven Task Force meetings were held, including informal introductions, site visits, and formal design meetings. The Task Force meetings are summarized as follows: Introductory Task Force Meeting Prior to beginning substantive work on the park, an initial informal introductory meeting with City Staff and Task Force members was held to discuss project scope, schedule, site characteristics, design elements, budgetary goals, master planning process, and meetings. The Task Force members were also asked about their interests, needs, concerns, ideas, and suggestions. Informal Task Force Site Visit A site visit with the City Staff and the Task Force was conducted to assess the site characteristics, discuss site opportunities, constraints, views, natural systems, and contextual setting. Task Force Meeting #1 A design charrette was held to give the Task Force members an opportunity to offer input and ideas into the park design. They were given grading plans and site element templates and created their own layouts for the park design. The Task Force members created seven — conceptual options and then chose three preferred schemes. Task Force Meeting #2 The Task Force responded to three refined Master Plan alternatives and chose their preferred plan. This plan was a combination of options from all three preferred schemes and incorporated additional comments from the meeting. Task Force Meeting #3 The preferred Master Plan was presented and approved by the Task Force. The plan was then brought before the Parks and Community Services Commission. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Task Force Meeting #2 Preferred scheme selection FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA V-1 SECTION V. PROCESS Task Force Meeting #4 This meeting further refined elements such as sports field lighting and a parking concept. In addition, a final phasing plan was selected. Task Force Meeting #5 The Master Plan and Phasing Plan were presented to the Task Force for review and comment. Budgetary constraints were also discussed. Parks and Community Services Commission Meeting #1 After the third Task Force Meeting the three master plan alternatives and preferred Master Plan were presented to the Parks and Community Services Commission. The Commission voiced concern with some of the items of the preferred plan, primarily that the site might not comfortably accommodate all of the elements and that not enough parking had been provided. They recommended that one 90' baseball field be dropped from the Master Plan to provide a better fit with the site and allow for additional parking. Parks and Community Services Commission Meeting #2 The Master Plan, Lighting Plan, Phasing Plan and cost estimates were presented to the Parks and Community Services Commission for review and comment. City Council Meeting The Master Plan, Lighting Plan, Phasing Plan, and cost estimates were presented to the City Council for review and comment. Throughout the Master Plan Process, Task Force members gave input and direction into the sports park development, allowing the design to meet the interests of the community. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Task Force Meeting #4 FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN. CALIFORNIA V-2 SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS In order to serve the needs and vision of the growing community and the vision of the City of Dublin, Fallon Sports Park will be the premier sports facility for all Dublin residents. The park will feature two terraces, with pedestrian and vehicular entries on each. The entries will have strong axial connections to the internal Park Activity hubs, which will provide a sense of place and arrival. The following section describes the specifics of the site and design elements. GRADING AND DRAINAGE ` The site will be graded into two main terraces to fit the sports fields within the 100-foot overall elevation change from the Gleason Drive/Fallon Road intersection (+1-490 feet) to the Lockhart Street/Central Parkway intersection (+/-390 feet). This 100-foot drop occurs over a 2,500-foot horizontal distance creating a 4% slope across the site. In addition, the terraces will be graded to allow vehicular entrances on both the upper and lower terraces. The grading will conform to all proposed edge conditions and will create "level" surfaces for the proposed field layouts. Approximately .5 million to 1 million cubic yards of import fill from adjacent developments will be used to create these terraces and will provide the majority of imported fill needed. A geotechnical report, created by Kleinfelder, Inc., states that slopes should be no steeper than 2H:1V (Horizontal: Vertical), and where feasible, slopes should be no steeper than 3H:1V (Horizontal: Vertical).3 In order to capitalize on the import fill and respond to the overall 100-foot elevation change on site, two main terraces with a 25- to 30-foot grade change will create level surfaces for sport fields, accessible pathways, and proper drainage. A48-inch storm main drainage system will run the perimeter of the site along Fallon Road and Central Parkway. This storm drainage system will handle drainage from adjacent developments, roadways, and accommodate all of the park drainage. Upper terrace vehicular only 3.'Geolecfini al Grading and Drainage Recommendations Proposed Fallon Sports Park Dublin, California,' (September 29, 2004): 12. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Existing site aerial photograph E . Lowe) terrace -..$tream corridor 'See section below Upper terrace FALLON SPORTS PARK, DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA VI-1 SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS The existing drainage swales and channels that run across the site from the northerly to the southerly border will be put into subsurface drains. Due to the highly expansive nature of the clay soils, the natural turf fields will require additional subsurface drainage systems. This subsurface drainage will also connect to the perimeter storm drainage lines. The overall drainage concept creates individual watersheds that connect to the perimeter storm drainage system. Specifically, each field, hub, and parking lot will serve as its own watershed and will connect to the perimeter storm -- drainage system. Further, each terrace will be a closed drainage system that directs all water into the storm drainage system. No water from the terraces will drain over the embankments below the terraces. The upper terrace parking lot will either have a fossil filter system or a small bioswale and biobasin to filter and drain the parking lot water before it reaches the storm drainage system. In addition, the lower terrace will have a bioswale that will filter water from the parking lot along Central Parkway. The park drainage will not drain into the stream corridor, as on -site water used for irrigation will be recycled water and recycled water is not compatible with the stream corridor habitat mitigation. SPORTS FIELDS As noted in the PRMP, Fallon Sports Park is intended to be "a park facility developed to accommodate ▪ the majority of competition ball fields in the City"4 that could be utilized for tournament play. The PRMP specifies two 90' baseball fields for the sports park, but one field was omitted due to site spatial and grading constraints. Through meetings with the Task Force and the Parks and Community Services Commission, a final list of park components was created. FALLON SPORTS PARK wp +tH 1! flln,.Iln, 4. "City of Dublin: Parks and Recreation Master Plan, March 2004 Update," (March 2004YY 50. CARDUCCI & A55dCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA GRADING PLAN C. O+,0.4 • u.. r +o'M COMMA NRRIYJ hyl VW &UCAKN +ATWA.' I.nli , rTIM I= weed ream .ask Caere» ■ Potion Road FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA VI-2 SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS II ■ The list of sport fields and uses is as follows: 4-60' Little League fields 4 softball fields (2 lighted) 4 soccer fields (2 lighted) 2 natural turf fields with a cricket field overlay 2 natural turf fields with a synthetic turf option* 1-90' baseball (lighted) 4 tennis courts (lighted) 4 basketball courts (lighted) 4 bocce courts (lighted) 2 additional bocce courts optional (lighted) 4 sand volleyball courts All baseball and softball fields will have perimeter warning tracks and will be fully fenced allowing them to accommodate premier tournament play. *See Appendix IX - Section f. for further discussion on synthetic fields. PARK IDENTITY FEATURES Fallon Sports Park was designed to be a memorable park utilizing a ranch theme. This theme is exemplified by the ranch -style fencing running the perimeter of the park and the large, traditional "ranch -gate" entryways at the two main entrances. In addition, on the four surrounding intersections, thematic signage will identify the park. It is important that the park create a memorable arrival experience, as it will be used by residents from Dublin and surrounding communities. PARK ENTRIES The entries to the park, celebrated by the large entryways, will welcome visitors into an exciting sports destination. The entryways distinguish the park from other facilities in the City of Dublin, as a "focal element for (the) Dublin Community."' The upper terrace will have a vehicular "bridge" crossing the stream corridor and the lower terrace vehicular entry will be on grade. There fi. _AT 11 FALLON SPORTS PARK MASTER PLAN will be a pedestrian bridge on the southern portion of Lockhart Street providing access from the proposed school and on -street parking. All entries will provide visitors with a sense of place and arrival as they enter the park. 5. "City of Dublin: Parks and Recreation Master Plan. March 2004 Update. {March 2004): 50. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA VI-3 SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS The October 23, 2003 TJKM Traffic Study proposed one four-way intersection on Lockhart Street at the entrance to the park.6 The current plan shows two intersections on Lockhart Street: one at the park entrance, which will remain a four-way intersection with one lane in and two lanes out, and one three-way intersection across from the pedestrian bridge. Both these intersections will connect with streets from the adjacent neighborhoods. At the time of the report no study had been completed on the lower terrace entry off Central Parkway. Although a preferred entry location for the park site is shown, further study of this entrance is needed as a housing development is planned directly across from the park on Central Parkway. It is expected that the lower terrace vehicular entry will also have one lane in and two lanes out, but a new traffic study or intersection requirement confirmation is needed. AUTOMOBILE PARKING The entries lead the visitors to tree -shaded parking areas located in the heart of the park, close to the facilities. As indicated in the PRMP, it was projected that the park would need roughly 500 parking spaces to serve its proposed facilities. Through the Master Planning process, and due to tight spatial and grading restrictions, a total of 459 parking spaces are located within the park. These spaces will be divided into two main lots with one off of each entry. An additional 84 on -street parking spaces will be directly related to the park on Lockhart Street and Central Parkway, as well as possible overflow parking at the proposed school across Lockhart Street. This provides fora total of 459 on -site parking spaces and 84 on -street parking spaces, adding up to 543 total parking spaces related to the park (See parking analysis table). PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION A system of pathways provides access to all areas and activities. The pathway system provides neighborhood connections to promote community use and access from all sides of the park. These neighborhood connections allow community residents to go for walks in the park on a loop pathway system. All pathways on site are accessible and connect to perimeter sidewalks. Pedestrian circulation pathways take advantage of the unique site characteristics such as views from the upper terrace, axial views from the main entry points, and interaction with the stream corridor edges. In particular, the pathways provide connections between facilities and will clearly direct and guide the visitors throughout the 60-acre park. There is an internal pathway system that connects the facilities and a perimeter loop system for exercise and walking. These pathways connect to the local neighborhood, the Dublin community, and the regional Tassajara bike trail. F.'Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Lockhart Street in Eastern Dublin, (October 23.213044. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Upper terrace entry and parking Lower terrace entry and parking :FACILITY 1115E Baseball Field Little League Field Softball Field Soccer Field Basketball Court Tennis Court Picnic Area Play Area Bocce Court Volleyball Court BMX Course Subtotal On -site Parking Total Lockhart Street Central Parkway Total On -street Parking Subtotal wi On -street Total Parking analysis table UPPER TERRACE LOWER TERRACE Facility 1 Spaces 4190 4190 4120 4110 1129 115 Facility,/ Spaces 1 i 24 41100 1i41 5 4,15 4 i 15 1115 259 parking sy)Fes 200 oarkinp spaces 459 Parking Spaces 23 282 Parking Spaces 44 17 61 291 Parking Spaces 543 Parking Spaces FALLON SPORTS PARK DURIAN, CALIFORNIA VI-4 SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS 4 It is essential to link the park to the surrounding neighborhoods and to the Dublin community through pathways and bike trail connections. There will be Class 2 Bike Lanes along Fallon Road, Gleason Drive, and Central Parkway and a multiuse trail along the stream corridor on Lockhart Street that connects Fallon Sports Park to the Dublin community. BICYCLE PARKING To encourage bicycling to and from the park, the Master Plan includes lockable bicycle parking distributed throughout the park at locations convenient to the park facilities and activity areas. SEATING AND PICNIC AREAS The Master Plan provides opportunities for sitting, viewing, picnicking, and barbecuing at various locations throughout the park. Although the park will be a premier sports park, it also provides activities for non -sport users. A series of small picnic areas are dispersed throughout the site — along the pathway system. At each of the two picnic plazas, there is group picnic seating for 100 people with an expansion area for 200. Each terrace will have approximately equal picnicking capacities, as there is an even distribution of tables at each terrace. The Little League and softball plazas are located within the sport hubs, each with a large picnic plaza to allow for tournament or end -of -season celebrations. In addition, smaller picnic plazas and picnic areas are dispersed throughout the park. 4 HUBS Separate hubs or concentrated use groupings are the concepts behind organizing and defining spaces and activities throughout the park. The activity hubs, defined with special paving and planting, will create a sense of place for the arrival on each terrace. In addition, the sport hubs will group each sport type and related facilities to create gathering and viewing places for the user. Each hub includes some enclosed dry and lockable storage for use by leagues and similar organizations. ACTIVITY HUBS These activity hubs will be composed of the following activities: Upper Terrace Activity Hub • Restroom/staff offices (200-300 sf) • Picnic plaza (covered with overhead arbor) • Play area • Shade trees • Water or art feature (optional) Lower Terrace Activity Hub • Restroom • Adventure play area • Shade trees • Water or art feature (optional) CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Pedestrian path Contour Pedestrian circulation diagram t WEE FEPEIT1L. €Nor & NEmneocn§ CONNECT'�j Neighborhood connection Upper terrace group picnic area Lower terrace group picnic area FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA Vl-5 SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS SPORT HUBS There will be a softball hub, a Little League hub, and a soccer hub, a small tennis center, and baseball, basketball, volleyball, and bocce ball area. These areas are composed of the following activities: Softball Hub • 4 softball fields (2 lighted) • Restroom/concession • Picnic plaza Shade trees Little League Hub • 4-60' Little League fields • Restroom/concession • Picnic plaza Shade trees Baseball Area — 1-90' baseball field (lighted) Terraced seating • Picnic area • Shade trees emilm Soccer Area • 4 soccer fields (2 lighted) 2 natural turf fields with a cricket field overlay 2 natural turf fields with a synthetic turf option • Viewing areas • Picnic areas • Shade trees Tennis Center • 4 tennis courts (lighted) • Restroom and small tennis center • Viewing area Basketball Area • 4 basketball courts (lighted) • Seating areas Volleyball Area • 4 sand volleyball courts • Picnic area Bocce Bali Center • 4 bocce courts (lighted) 2 additional bocce courts optional (lighted) • Shaded seating area • Picnic area CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Upper Terrace softball hub with restroorn/ concession FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA VI - b SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS LIGHTING — Lighting requirements in the park differ between sports, vehicular and pedestrian. The vehicular and pedestrian lighting will identify the entries and provide orientation for park visitors. In order to minimize any potential impacts to the surrounding developments, the sports lighting will be concentrated at the center of the park and across from the proposed school site. All lighting will be designed with "cut-off' style lights, which direct illumination down and not out. Lighting Criteria: • Light required areas only �- • Light only paths that connect lighted facilities to parking lots • Light pathways to minimum requirements to discourage nighttime use • Light parking lots for nighttime safety • Light entries to distinguish park from street and to welcome users • Park hours will be dawn to dusk and until 10 p.m. for lighted facilities • Provide specific lighting types for specified facilities (as noted in the Lighting Table) Sport Field Lighting • 1 baseball field • 2 softball fields • 2 soccer fields • 4 tennis courts • 4 basketball courts • 2 bocce courts (2 additional courts optional) Mounting Height and Foot Candle Table As seen in the Mounting Height and Foot Candle Table, sports lighting depends on the desired level of play. Competition play demands greater illumination while lighting for recreation purposes reduces the illumination and the cost. To be a premier sports park, the competition level lighting should be provided. FALLON SPORTS PARK LIGHTING DIAGRAM C,TY OF DUBLIN CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC ▪ 5AN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ••# • r• •- FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA VI-7 SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS PLANTING Due to the varying terrain and park uses, different plant materials will be used to define park elements; the planting will reinforce the use and reflect the fandforms. In addition the park will be irrigated with recycled water that will limit some types of planting. The Master Plan identifies seven tree types for Fallon Sports Park: • Street Trees (perimeter street trees consistent with the Planning Department requirements and the overall planned development) • Entry Trees (formal trees identifying the entries) • Accent Trees (attractive, seasonal, colorful trees reinforcing areas of interest) • Deciduous Shade Trees (lining parking lots and pathways at sport hubs) • Evergreen Screen Trees (as backdrops to baseball, Little League, and softball fields) • Native Riparian Edge Trees (to relate to stream corridor and provide wildlife habitat) • Native Oak and Sycamore Groves (on slopes to provide shade, add interest, and frame views) MAINTAINED FOOT CANDLES FACILITY/ USE MOUNTING HEIGHT CompetitionlRecreatton 2 Softball Fields Infield 50' 501 30 Outfield 80'-sideline 1 70'. outfield 301 20 1 Baseball Field Infield SO' 501 30 Outfield90'- sideline 180'- outfield 30120 2 Soccer Fields 70' 301 20 4 Tennis Courts 30' 30120 4 Basketball Courts 30' 30120 4 Bocce Courts 30' 10 1 5 Sport Hubs 14' 1 Activity Hubs 14' 1 Vehicular Entnes 20' 1 ArrivallDrdp-off 20' 1 Pedestrian Bridge 30° 1 Parking Lighting 20' 0.5 at perimeter and 1 tc average Path Lighting 14' 0.5 Security Lighting Determined by police dept. Determined by police dept. Perimeter Sidewalks Lit by public street Lit by public street IRRIGATION The irrigation system should be designed for water conservation, flow management, energy efficiency and interface with any future Central Irrigation System. The irrigation system will use recycled water in accordance with the Dublin San Ramon Services District standards. Where the facilities such as softball, Little League, baseball, soccer, picnic, and play areas will have users in potential contact with the water, any irrigation will need to be done after 10 p.m. and before dawn. Nonrecycled water will be used specifically for washing down areas, field hoses, watering of synthetic fields for cooling, water features, etc. The recycled water is not to be used in areas where there will be human contact. It is also mandatory that recycled water does not drain into the stream corridor and instead drains into the perimeter storm drainage system. The recycled water system will run during non-use times between the hours of 10 p.m. and dawn. Refer to irrigation and recycled water demand analysis and DSRSD water flow and pressure information in Appendix IX -Section e. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, [NC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Mounting height and foot candle table Accent frees at entry activity hub FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA VI-8 SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS UTILITIES Stub -ins from perimeter street utilities should be provided at each vehicular entry (one on each terrace). The stub -ins should provide the park with the following utilities: • Electricity • Telephone • Sanitary sewer • Recycled water • Irrigation water • Domestic water • Fire water (centrally locate one fire hydrant for each terrace - final location to be approved by the Fire Department) • Storrn drainage system (stub- - ins from Fallon Road and Central Parkway) CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES. INC 5AN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA gt\\ IF \ • " 4Sli .400, ,C TY OF DUltIN • FALLON SPORTS PARK SCHEMATIC RRIGATION PLANT. LEGEND VAA RIVKIN) MUFF. WATEI FONT Of CONFOCT1ON POW COPO4.E.L-70.1 IUG AllON CONFROUEIL 0 7 o• FALLON SORTS Pek105 DUBLIN, CALIFdRNIA VI-9 SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS CARDUCCI & ,t)SSQCIATES. INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA VI-10 . w1 FALLON RANCH PARK SCHEMATIC LEGEND F OTAIII WATIR • 17 ..Aaf raw IAHITAIT' Sl Mrll Fitt wATCI . RISFROOM OS CONCCssioN ECONNCCTIOI yir FIRC HYDRANT 7 i KW AY FALLON SPORTS PARK SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS CARDUCCI & A,sSOCIATES. INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA VI-11 11111-10. FALLON SPORTS PARK MAW! MOM MAW SYSTEM .�..�pm.,el.t. p•pankReo plop *COMMIT SRAM DtAIV STSTlM. • OtA WACI STIUCTIII QIAIFA[dl TIVILKTURE FALLON SPORTS PARK SECTION VI. DESIGN COMPONENTS • FALLON SPORTS PARK CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES. INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FALLON SPORTS PARK DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA VI-12 SECTION VII. PHASING PHASING Fallon Sports Park phasing will provide a variety of facilities that serve a wide range of users. In addition, proposed road — construction dates may also influence park development. Therefore, the park will be developed in phases that include Phase 1, and Subsequent Phases that will be subdivided, if needed, as the project evolves. Phase 1 Phase 1 developments will provide a variety of activities and uses while developing the core of the upper terrace to create a cohesive and self-contained park. A significant portion of the upper terrace facilities are shown in Phase 1 because it is projected that Lockhart Street will be completed first, allowing for vehicular access. In addition, all lighted fields or courts, except the baseball field, are to be constructed in Phase 1. Phase 1 will also include the two lighted soccer fields, with a synthetic turf option. A list of Phase 1 facilities follows: • Upper terrace park identification features — • Upper terrace parking lot • Pedestrian bridge • 2-60' Little League fields with hub 2 lighted softball fields with hub • 4 lighted basketball courts • 4 lighted tennis courts • 2 lighted soccer fields • Loop walking trail (connects upper and lower terrace) CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA + •• s � • K • TyO Or _ ► •• . 4. *, PHASE\;" • nam4 I. *. tr S. • z a FALLON RANCH H SPORTS PARK PHASING DIAGRAMS �. _. C6]Y F OHRIIN - 4 - • - • nratLn ":42 u• __ Ate. • fitiv • 0 + 1 • E E 8 • 4• , • r'-i J' , --7 ;1 1 � tir J I • ▪ s UPPER TERRACE** i;+ 44 PHASE is '*'% • 7 44+ 44 •w PHASING CONCEPT FOLLOW ROAD DETWLOPMENI PROVIDE A VAIIEIV of FACRmES AND USES HALO HGNIN TIMM AHD COURTS FIRS! T0,Mc1 ASE usuun PRONLDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OPF FALCON paAA FOR 5l$3*OL*1.I PHASE OEVRLOIPMENT ROAD AND STREAM CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT-If1scAtnal GLEASON DIEM . COMIW Q LOCKHART LANE. COAVI[TE IDES/2 OS STRHAL CORRIOCTR . COht3TWCr. 0NG WITH LOCKHART lApd mamma RnEAM CORRIDOR ON GLEASON DWI PALLOR RTAD- NORTHERN NW OP ROAD, SA• RCP, AND SQUD*EN MAE1 MASS GEAOING. nun x LAME COMDEIE xDORTOODS • wR]EN AND COMPETE FM1DN RL1W 2UD6/2DDJ CENRAL PARKWAY COMNE1E 2OO /70DTF PHASE 1 PEDESTTDAN Mt0GE Two LITTLE LEASER RElns wTDL ASSOCLUED HATA PICMC. AND RESIEOOM/CGNCE55 ON TwO LIGHTED SOPAALL MDR VAM ASfpd,ALEp PLATA, PTCNRC, AND RESTROGM/LDNd.`3E1DN Pam LIGHTED TIMM COLIMIS MINT LIGHTED SASCETRAll COURTS rwo LIGHTED NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELDS WGN SYNTHETIC 1W IOPIIO$ALF ART AND WARR PRATIURES UPPER TERRACE PARKING LOT LIPPER SWAM LOOP WAMIRO TRAIL } UPPER TERRACE PAR[ 00411EicATION FEATURES tH . * ROUGH GRADING IN PHASE 1 • i ___ SUBSEQUENT PHASES IAORDER OF DEVNOPRMENT TO RE O 1ERM NEDI s" `, f ! L • r - w•' l4) LOWER TERRACE PHAS4 1 • R 1 rt�ii�s r. 41+0.'1 ANC. •'•r*:wF* ARKWA' Phasing plan • ' ' ! Ms WPM TRRRAC. .- ■. ACIRRYH INCLUDING DC1x PIA A. PUT AIM HERD RESTROOMsI TWO urns LEAGTFE F$WE f W0 SafIRALl HEWS RAUICOINSE HEIGIMORHDOD CONNECTIONS PROVIDE TE/APORARF CONSTRU[TLoll ACCESS OFF OFF FALCON ROAD A+ iLOWER TEPRACE ♦ I • PARKING MP ACTMII' NIA IM0L DING, FIO C NAM. HAP AREA, A!L RE5ROC]ALTD • TWO NATURAL LLM SOCCER P+LT wills CRICKET OVERLAY • ONE HOHTEDRASERALI FI9G • POUR LIGHTED BOCCE COURTS TWO ADDITIONAL LIGHTED bCCE COMETS ioP*io«ALI • FOAM SAND VOiLETLUL COLMTR • ART AHD WATER FEAIU T • NEIGM WOODGOWroTRgNU • PARK IDEAL IFIGUON FEATRES COAUSETEurns AIi! LOWER 1E31ACE D 1a•R 2D0 SOD FALLON iP9RTS PARS( DUBLIN, CALIFaRNIA VI 1-1 SECTION VII. PHASING Subsequent Phases • The order of the remaining phases will be determined in the future and will provide uses current with budgeting, community use demands, and surrounding road completion. • Subsequent phases will be developed to allow for efficient staging and access. • Subsequent phases will be designed so as not to impact prior phase improvements. Tentative Schedule for Road Completion Dates: • Gleason Road — Completed • Lockhart Street— Complete 2005/2006 • Stream Corridor — Will be constructed along with Lockhart Street (including stream corridor on Gleason Drive) • Fallon Road — Northern half of road, storm drainage, southern half of mass grading, plus two lanes — Complete 2004/2005 • Widen and complete Fallon Road — Complete 2006/2007 • Central Parkway — Complete 2006/2007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The Dublin Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) included Falcon Sports Park. The ERR did not identify specific park uses, which will require the City to file a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Impact (Neg. Dec.). Staff has prepared the Neg. Dec. in conjunction with this Master Plan report to allow for all future design and construction to move forward without further environmental review. The exception would be if any of the uses addressed in the Master Plan are changed or added to, as this may require the environmental review to be reopened. CAROUCCI, $L ASSOCtIAIES, INC SAµ FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FALLON SPORTS PARK UUBLIN, CALIFORHIA V1t-2 , Fr FALLON RANCH SPORTS PARK PHASING DIAGRAM, k Q aa'. .44 PHASE 1 • rtarWF4 4 Nt, flI C4 40e CON..FCrwrw UPPER TERRACE PHASE • ••H t r Fri •CI INC. F .tIISN Dom.. Nnrcnow ova. •{•FSr•IAw Fwr.r N COOMF04wO.O C ONNeCr�vN LOWER TERRACE PHASE II �L ! • TWO NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELDS WITH CRICKET OVERLAY., �r • ONE LIGHTED BASEBALL FIELD '' } r� •� • FOUR LIGHTED BOCCE COURTS !�—. y TWO ADDITIONAL LIGHTED BOCCE COURTS (OPTIONAL} ' #i Q AR K W A •.e.:wcIrr 4441441044 OOO CO Nwt{rl Ow .•, :,:. .• 14, r. i.ORANC.I.CIF• 4•SRI PHASING CONCEPT FOLLOW ROAD DEVELOPMENT PROVIDE A VARIETY OF FACILITIES AND USES BUILD LIGHTED FIELDS AND COURTS FIRST TO INCREASE USABILITY PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OFF FALLON ROAD FOR SUBSEQUENT PHASE DEVELOPMENT ROAD AND STREAM CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT. (FISCALYEAR) GLEASON DRIVE -COMPLETED LOCKHART LANE -COMPLETE 2005/2006 STREAM CORRIDOR - CONSTRUCT ALONG WITH LOCKHART LANE (INCLUDING STREAM CORRIDOR ON GLEASON DRIVE( FALLON ROAD, NORTHERN HALF OF ROAD, 54" RCP, AND SOUTHERN HALF MASS GRADING, PLUS 2 LANES -COMPLETE 2001/2005 WIDEN AND COMPLETE FALLON ROAD 2006/2007 CENTRAL PARKWAY - COMPLETE 2006/2007 PHASE 1 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TWO 'LITTLE LEAGUE FIELDS WITH ASSOCIATED PLAZA, PICNIC, AND RESTROOM/CONCESSION TWO LIGHTED SOFTBALL FIELDS WITH ASSOCIATED PLAZA, PICNIC, AND RESTROOM/CONCESSION FOUR LIGHTED TENNIS COURTS FOUR LIGHTED BASKETBALL COURTS TWO LIGHTED NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELDS WITH SYNTHETIC TURF (OPTIONAL( ART AND WATER FEATURES UPPER TERRACE PARKING LOT UPPER TERRACE LOOP WALKING TRAIL UPPER TERRACE PARK IDENTIFICATION FEATURES / WAX COURSE • ROUGH GRADING IN PHASE 1 Mi• IOFn*Nr 1••fu•F Ni 14.41Nao• I. lei IcN•r3I ":'" r,on SUBSEQUENT PHASES It (ORDER OF DEVELOPMENT TO BE DETERMINED( 41 ZIPPER TERRACE ►►►"' ♦ • ACTIVITY HUB (INCLUDING PICNIC PLAZA, PLAY AREA, AND RESTROOMS) fL • TWO LITTLE LEAGUE FIELDS 1 • TWO SOFTBALL FIELDS I • BMX COURSE • NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS •.1 • PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OFF OF :1. st FALLON ROAD i h LOWER TERRACE • PARKING AND ACTIVITY HUB (INCLUDING, PICNIC PLAZA, PLAY AREA, AND RESTROOMSI ,-"'' • FOUR SAND VOLLEYBALL COURTS • ART AND WATER FEATURES • NEIGHEORHCH)D CONNECTIONS • PARK IDENTIFICATION FEATURES - • COMPLETE UPPER AND LOWER TERRACE 0 100 200 300 ,, — SECTION Vila. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CITY COUNCIL Janet Lockhart - Mayor — George Zika - Vice Mayor Claudia McCormick - Councilmember Tony Oravetz - Councilmember Kasie Hildenbrand - Councilmernber Tim Sbranti - Councilmember (Former) PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION Sue Flores - Chairperson Steve Jones - Vice Chairperson Burr Cain - Commissioner Richard Guarienti - Commissioner Angela Muetterties - Commissioner Kasie Hildenbrand - Commissioner (Former) Erik Smith - Student Representative CITY STAFF Diane Lowart - Parks and Community Services Director Hernia Lichtenstein - Parks and Facilities Development Manager Rosmary Alex - Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator Rich Jochner - Recreation Supervisor — Paul Kruger - City Civil Engineer Consultant Melissa Morton - Director of Public Works — TASK FORCE Anthony Casadonte Ignatus Chinn Roy Chowduri Greg Duncan Alan Elias David Galli Richard Guarienti Michele Haubert Diane Hudson Jim North Arlene Elizabeth Raffo Kimberly Roth _ Ellen Silky Anupam Singh Karen Y. Wang Eric Weinhagen — Dave Chadbourne Jeff Lawrence Shane Huntoon — Connie Mack Paul Silvas Brandon Chapin CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA VE� ON RArNCH. r SPORTS FAK DUBLIN; CALIFORNIA SECTION VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS MASTER PLAN CONSULTANTS Carducci & Associates, Inc. (Landscape Architects) Bill Fee - Principal Vince Lattanzio - Principal Yi Jin Kim - Associate Jim Bensman -Associate Tony Esterbrooks - Associate Dave Andrews - Associate Zeiger Engineers (Electrical Engineers) Ron Zeiger Bohley Consulting, inc. (Civil Engineers) Pete Bohley DEVELOPER REPRESENTATIVES MacKay & Somps Dave Chadbourne Jeff Lawrence Matt Jenson CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES. INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ON RANCH. SPORTS PARK DUBLIN*, CALIFORNIA =TM' V#II-2 mmo L SECTION IX. APPENDICES a. TASK FORCE MEETING AGENDAS • INTRODUCTORY MEETING (04-28-04) • DESIGN MEETING 1 (05-26-04) • DESIGN MEETING 2 (06-16-04) • DESIGN MEETING 3 (09-08-04) DESIGN MEETING 4 (10-06-04) • DESIGN MEETING 5 (11-03-04) CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC - SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 77-M1 FALLON SPORTS PAkK DUBLIN`, CALIFORNIA IXa-1 ucci L A vU..If SCAPE " ARCI TECTS • April 28, 2004 Meeting Agenda Fallon Sport Park Introductory Task Force Meeting 7:00PM Dublin Citv Hall — Council Chambers 100 Civic Plaza, 94568 I. Welcome and Project Overview — Diane Lowart, City of Dublin, Director of Parks and Community Services Department II. Introductions — Vince Lattanzio, Carducci Landscape Architects III. Task Force Members Input A. Interests B. Needs C. Concerns D. Ideas E. Suggestions IV. Review of Project Program — Bill Fee, Carducci Landscape Architects , F. Distribution of program, site plan and program templates V Review of Site Conditions — Yi Sin Kim, Carducci Landscape Architects A, Context, traffic patterns, neighborhood, physical constraints, grading, drainage, natural syste: opportunities, views, etc. VI. Review of Task Force Planning Process — Vince Lattanzio A. Discussion of meeting schedule VII. Discussion of Next Steps — Vince Lattanzio A Next meetings: Site Walk, 5/1/04, 10:00 AM at corner of Fallon Road and Bent Tree Design Meeting # 1: 5/26/04, 7:00 PM at Dublin City Hall, Regional Meeting Roma CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET .SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • IRRIGATION DESIGN • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN AGENDA Fallon Ranch Sports Park Task Force Meeting #1 7 PM Dublin City Hall — Regional Room May 26, 2004 1, Summarize Introductory Meeting and Site Walk II. Design Workshop — Vince Lattanxio, Carducci Landscape Architects A. Distribution of Grading Plan (basic template) and new sports field templates B. Group Formation (3 Groups) C. Design Charrette (3 Groups) III. Design Workshop Review A. Review of group design concepts IV. Next Steps V. Meeting Schedule Meeting Introductory Meeting Site Visit Meeting Design Meeting #1 Design Meeting #2 Design Meeting #3 Design Meeting #4 Design Meeting #5 Date & Time April 28, 2004,7:00 PM, May 1, 2004, 10:00 AM May 26, 2004 7:00 PM, June 16, 2004,7:00 PM Sept 8, 2004,7:00 PM Oct 6, 2004,7:00 PM Nov 3, 2004,7:00 PM Place City Hall Council Chambers Intersection of Bent Tree & Fallon Rd City Hall — Regional Room Library Community Room City Hall — Regional Room City Hall — Regional Room City Hall — Regional Room Final presentation to Council for adoption of Master Plan - December 7, 2004 Meeting Purpose Introductory Meeting Site Familiarity Design Charrette Review 3 Alternative Plans Review Preferred Plan Presentation Confirmation & Phasing Review Final Plan & Phasing r CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET . SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • IRRIGATION DESIGN • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN AGENDA Fallon Ranch Sports Park Task Force Meeting #2 Dublin Library Community Room 7 PM, June 16, 2004 Summarize Last Meeting Present 3 Alternative Plans to Task Force Members Review & Comment of 3 Alternative Plans by Task Force Members A. Review of each plan by Task Force Members B. Record Comments C. Task Force Members vote for preferences Summarize Comments & Preferences Next Steps VI. Meeting Schedule Meeting Introductory Meeting Site Visit Meeting Design Meeting #1 Design Meeting #2 Design Meeting #3 Design Meeting #4 Design Meeting #5 Date & Time April 28, 2004,7:00 PM, May 1, 2004, 1 0:00 AM May 26, 2004, 7:00 PM June 16, 2004. 7:00 PM Sept 8, 2004, 7:00 PM Oct 6, 2004, 7:00 PM Nov 3, 2004, 7:00 PM Place City Hall Council Chambers Intersection of Bent Tree & Fallon Rd City Hall — Regional Room Library Community Room City Hall — Regional Room City Hall — Regional Room City Hall — Regional Room Final presentation to Council for adoption of Master Plan - December 7, 2004 Meeting Purpose Introductory Meeting Site Familiarity Design Chan-ette Review 3 Alternative Plans Review Preferred Plan Presentation Confirmation & Phasing Review Final Plan & Phasing CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET , SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • IRRIGATION DESIGN • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN C RC7 1.ntin ARCH .11 IJC SCh I'E TECTS AGENDA Fallon Ranch Sports Park Task Force Meeting #3 City Hall — Regional Room 7 PM, September 8, 2004 Summarize Progress since Last Meeting A. Grading B. Parks & Community Services Commission input II. Present Preferred Plan & Supporting Documents to Task Force Members III, Review & Comment of Preferred Plan & Supporting Documents by Task Force Members A. Record Comments IV Summarize Comments 11. V, Next Steps VI. Meeting Schedule Meeting Introductory Meeting Site Visit Meeting Design Meeting #1 Design Meeting #2 Design Meeting #3 Design Meeting #4 Design Meeting #5 Date & Time April 28, 2004,7:00 PM, May 1, 2004, 10:00 AM May 26, 2004, 7:00 PM June 16, 2004, 7:00 PM Sept 8, 2004, 7:00 PM Oct 6, 2004, 7:00 PM Nov 3, 2004, 7:00 PM Place City Hall Council Chambers Intersection of Bent Tree & Fallon Rd City Hall — Regional Room Library Community Room City Hall — Regional Room City Hall — Regional Room City Hall — Regional Room Final presentation to Council for adoption of Master Plan - December 7, 2004 Meeting Purpose Introductory Meeting Site Familiarity Design Charrette Review 3 Alternative Plans Review Preferred Plan Presentation Confirmation & Phasing Review Final Plan & Phasing CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET , SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • IRRIGATION DESIGN • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN CARD L A ' D ARCH! CI }CA f'E TEL TS AGENDA Fallon Ranch Sports Park Task Force Meeting #4 City Hall — Regional Room 7 PM, October 6, 2004 Summarize Progress since Last Meeting A. Incorporate revisions based on TF comments B. Coordinate with MacKay & Somps Engineers II. Presentation to Task Force Members A. Plan Revisions B. Phasing Options III. Review & Comment of Phasing Options by Task Force Members A. Record Comments IV. Summarize Comments V. Next Steps VI. Meeting Schedule Meeting Introductory Meeting Site Visit Meeting Design Meeting #I Design Meeting #2 Design Meeting #3 Design Meeting #4 Date & Time April 28, 2004,7:00 PM, May I, 2004, 1 0:00 AM May 26, 2004, 7:00 PM June 16, 2004, 7:00 PM Sept 8, 2004, 7:00 PM Oct 6, 2004, 7:00 PM Design Meeting #5 Nov 3, 2004, 7:00 PM Final presentation to Council for adoption of Master Plan - December 7, 2004 Place City Hall Council Chambers Intersection of Bent Tree & Fallon Rd City Hall — Regional Room Library Community Room City Hall — Regional Room City Hall — Regional Room City Hall — Regional Room Meeting Purpose Introductory Meeting Site Familiarity Design Charrette Review 3 Alternative Plans Review Preferred Plan Presentation Confirmation & Phasing Review Final Plan & Phasing CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET . SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • IRRIGATION DESIGN • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN CARD c I LAND I&scAre A¢[Fil1 TECTS AGENDA Fallon Ranch Sports Park Task Force Meeting #5 7 PM Dublin City Hall — Council Chambers November 3, 2004 I. Summarize Introductory Meeting and Site Walk Il. Design Workshop — Vince Lattanzio, Carducci Landscape Architects A, Distribution of Grading Plan (basic template) and new sports field templates B. Group Formation (3 Groups) C. Design Charrette (3 Groups) r III. Design Workshop Review A. Review of group design concepts IV, Next Steps V. Meeting Schedule Meeting Date & Time Place Parks Commission November 22, 2004 City Council December 7, 2004 Meeting Purpose Adoption of Master Plan Adoption of Master Plan CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET . SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • IRRIGATION DESIGN • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN SECTION IX. APPENDICES b. TASK FORCE MEETING MINUTES INTRODUCTORY MEETING (04-28-04) SITE VISIT MEETING (05-1-04) DESIGN MEETING 1 (05-26-04) • DESIGN MEETING 2 (06-16-04) • DESIGN MEETING 3 (09-08-04) • DESIGN MEETING 4 (10-06-04) • DESIGN MEETING 5 (11-03-04) CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES. INC - SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FALION: SP©;l TS_PkU( ' - DUBLIN*, CALIFORNIA IXb-1 CARD UCCI LAND . SCAPE ARCH! . TECTS Date: To: Job Name Job # Re By MEETING NOTES 04-28-04 Herma Lichtenstein Fallon Ranch Sports Park DUB03-02 Informal Task Force Meeting Jin Kim On Wednesday, April 28, 2004 an informal meeting was held with the Task Force to review the project and get initial input from the Task Force members. Refer to attached Agenda. Attendees Name X Diane Lowart (DL) X Herma Lichtenstein (HL) X Rich Jochner (RJ) X Anthony Casadonte (AC) Egnatus Chinn (IC) Roy Chowdhuri (RC) Greg Duncan (GD) X Alan Elias (AE) X David Galli (DG) X Michele Haubert (MH) X Diane Hudson (DH) X Jim North (JN) X Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR) X Kimberly Roth (KR) X Ellen Silky (ES) X Anupam Singh (AS) Karen Y. Wang (KW) Eric Weinhagen (EW) X Mary X Dave Chadbourne (DC) Jeff Lawrence (JL) X Shane Huntoon (SH) X Richard Guarienti (RG) X Connie Mack (CM) X Paul Silvas (P5) Brandon Chapin (BC) X Vince Lattanzio (VL) X Bill Fee (BF) X Jin Kim (EM) Affiliation City of Dublin City of Dublin City of Dublin Dublin Ranch HOA (President) Summer Glen HOA Summer Glen HOA Dublin Ranch Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League Dublin Ranch Bocce, Dublin Little League Dublin Little League Summer Glen HOA (CFO) Dublin Green Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President) Greenbrier Dublin Ranch Senior Center Developer (Mac Kay & Somps) Developer (Braddock & Logan) Special Interest Group (BMX) Parks and Community Services Commission Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission Senior Center Advisory committee Youth Advisory Committee Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciasseciates.com Jin@ cardu cciassociates.coin LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN Fallon Sports Park The following were initial comments from individual members: Mary: Dublin Senior Center Paul Silvas: Dublin Senior Center Get input 4:00 sun, keep sun out of base persons eyes Wind Sande - Arlene Elizabeth Raffo: Summer Glen HOA Sports input Shane Huntoon: non-resident/ BMX group advocate Wants to introduce BMX to Dublin. It is a sport for everyone 3-60 yrs old Kimberly Roth Real estate value Toll Brothers. Orchard HOA representative David Galli: Soccer advocate Soccer 1500 kids 30% annual increase in annual participation Diane Hudson: Bocce, everyone can play, low impact, provide 2 courts Anupam Singh: Sybase employee, VP of Northern Cricket Association, Cricket advocate Cricket ground here in Dublin 32 teams Anthony Casadonte: Dublin Ranch HOA Balanced interest of community Richard Guarienti: Parks and Community Services Commissioner Represent Western Dublin _ Was an EGP Master Plan Task Force Member Dogs? Trails walking Balance Here for input and to integrate Here for input and to listen Alan Elias: Dublin Ranch, writes for the Valley Times Has 3 kids, likes baseball and organized sports T Like to see Dublin get ahead of the curve to meet recreation needs Rich Jochner: Recreation Supervisor Dave Chadbourne: MacKay & Somps Lin Family representative and worked on planning for Lin family for 12 yrs No preconceived ideas, relate park to context, circulation, lighting, earthwork Michele Hauber: a parent Shade, restrooms, cover Jim North: Dublin Little League Baseball Board Member, Little League Baseball advocate Balance of facilities, appropriate adjacencies Ellen Silky: Dublin Little League, a parent Shade, parking, restrooms Connie Mack: Heritage and Cultural Arts Commissioner - Open Comments and Questions During Review of Program, Site Conditions and the Planning Process: CARDUCCI Sc ASSOCIATES. INC.. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 - www.carducciassociates.com lin@carducciassociates.corn LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN Why move Fallon Road? Need to meet requirements for safe road geometric standards of City. Good to have activity for seniors, walking Plants: Include opportunity to make park a demonstration garden and would like nametags of planting for educational value. Use of native plants a good idea. Infrastructure: does this include drainage? Need better drainage than at other parks. - Will there be a master plan review of the citywide plan to look at the allocation of the facilities? Yes, at the next meeting. - What parks are now are on hills in Dublin? Dolan, Ted Fairfield Trees: take 25 years to grow, wind blows them sideways; why not plant mature trees? Need to have shade. Process timeline: What is the process and timeline? It will be similar to Emerald Glen Park, 10-year development process to be completed in phases. Type of grass: Have soccer grass, baseball grass Do not overlay baseball and soccer fields Have permanent fences for baseball 4 adult softball and 2 adult baseball fields will generate revenue - How is this project funded? Developer fees Annual review of revenues Build in phases as the money comes in, as population & needs grows, as tax revenue grow, etc. Consider Synthetic Turf here to minimize maintenance and maximize year-round use. What is time frame for phase 1? Unknown at this time — Have Snack bar/ concession stand Coordinate with EGP development Sept 8 meeting may be conflict with Labor Day holiday? Can be rescheduled if necessary Can we look at ideas and drawings together? Yes Develop 2 or 3 options for the task force to review Yes — Lighting concerns: Lack of light or too much light. From Dublin Ranch the Pleasanton Sports Park is visible and dominates the valley at night CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com jin[ c.arducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN Usability concerns: If its dark people cannot use the facilities. People have jobs and can't play until the evening when it is dark. They come home and evenings are the only time for them to use. 7 to 730pm is a common time for recreation and it is usually dark therefore you need lighting for sports. But not too much light Understand surrounding development and the effect sports lights will have - Too much light can be detrimental to property values Try to minimize impacts - How do we get in touch with you guys? Send all pictures and emails to Herma (the gate keeper) - What is BMX? BMX, all unique in response to site, 80' by 200' area Shane will provide info on BMX course design (see original flip chart notes page 8) Is roller hockey a consideration? New Pleasanton park: At Val Vista east of 680 @ Stone ridge is a good model to look at. Think out of the box for the stream corridor Consider waterfalls Responsible dog owners Provide dog area and maybe dog waste bag dispenser posts throughout the park Drinking fountains throughout the project for convenient use near sports facilities - lst phase should provide adequate parking and restroom facilities for visitors Consider family restrooms Place restrooms convenient to small children's play areas For Saturday meet at 10 am at the site There is a park in Colorado on a hillside End of Meeting Notes Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, Inc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 - www.carducciassociates.com jin@carducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN CARD LAND ARCM ccr SCAPE 7ECTS Date: To: Job Name Job # Re By MEETING NOTES 05-01-04 Herma Lichtenstein Fallon Ranch Sports Park DU B03-02 Informal Task Force Site Visit Jin Kim On Saturday, May 1, 2004 an informal meeting was held with the Task Force to review the project and get initial input from the Task Force members. Refer to attached Agenda. Attendees Name _ Diane Lowart (DL) X Herma Lichtenstein (HL) Rich Jochner (RJ) Anthony Casadonte (AC) Ignatus Chinn (IC) Roy Chowdhuri (RC) Greg Duncan (GD) X Alan Elias (AE) David Galli (DG) Michele Haubert (MH) Diane Hudson (DH) Jim North (JN) Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR) Kimberly Roth (KR) Ellen Silky (ES) Anupam Singh (AS) Karen Y. Wang (KW) Eric Weinhagen (EW) Mary Dave Chadbourne (DC) Jeff Lawrence (JL) Shane Huntoon (SH) X Richard Guarienti (RG) X Connie Mack (CM) X Paul Silvas (PS) Brandon Chapin (BC) X Vince Lattanzi° (VL) X Bill Fee (BF) X Jin Kim (EM) Affiliation City of Dublin City of Dublin City of Dublin Dublin Ranch HOA (President) Summer Glen HOA Summer Glen HOA Dublin Ranch Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League Dublin Ranch Bocce, Dublin Little League Dublin Little League Summer Glen HOA (CFO) Dublin Green Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President) Greenbriar Dublin Ranch Senior Center Developer (Mac Kay & Somps) Developer (Braddock & Logan) Special Interest Group (BMX) _ Parks and Community Services Commission Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission Senior Center Advisory committee Youth Advisory Committee Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects C.ARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciasssociates.corn jin@carducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN Fallon Sports Park The following were comments from the members: VL: Introduction to Tassajara formation, which is the soil that will be imported to the site. The overview of the soil condition of the site and his recommendations. We might need to take the top (e) layer of the site soil aside then fill with import soil (Tassajara formation) then relay (e) soil on top. 54" RCP the third knoll will get cut back quite a bit due to fallon rd. Water feature near Gleason End of Meeting Notes Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, Inc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes. CARDLJCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com jin@carducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN • CARD LAND ARCH 0 urci SCAYE TECTS - Date: To: Job Name - Job# Re By MEETING NOTES 06-07-04 Herma Lichtenstein Fallon Ranch Sports Park DUB03-02 Task Force Meeting #1 David Andrews On Wednesday, May 26, 2004 a meeting with the Task Force was held at the City Hall Regional Room to provide the members with an opportunity to participate in a design charette that lead to the creation of three - preferred design schemes. Refer to attached Agenda. Attendees Name X Diane Lowart (DL) X Herma Lichtenstein (HL) X Rich Jochner (RJ) Anthony Casadonte (AC) Ignatus Chinn (IC) Roy Chowdhuri (RC) Greg Duncan (GO) X Alan Elias (AE) X David Galli (DG) Michele Haubert (MH) X Diane Hudson (DH) X Jim North (JN) Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR) Kimberly Roth (KR) Ellen Silky (ES) X Anupam Singh (AS) X Karen Y. Wang (KW) Eric Weinhagen (EW) X Dave Chadbourne (DC) Jeff Lawrence (JL) X Shane Huntoon (SH) Richard Guarienti (RG) X Connie Mack (CM) X Paul Silvas (PS) X Brandon Chapin (BC) X Danny Wang X Kasie Hildenbrand • Affiliation City of Dublin City of Dublin City of Dublin Dublin Ranch HOA (President) Summer Glen HOA Summer Glen HOA Dublin Ranch Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League Dublin Ranch Bocce, Dublin Little League Dublin Little League Summer Glen HOA (CFO) Dublin Green Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President) Greenbrier Dublin Ranch Developer (Mac Kay & Sommps) Developer (Braddock & Logan) Special Interest Group (BMX) Parks and Community Services Commission Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission Senior Center Advisory committee Youth Advisory Committee PCSC CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 - www.carducciassociates.corn david@carducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN x x x x x Vince Lattanzi° (VL) Bill Fee (BF) Jin Kim (JK) David Andrews (DA) Chungpo Fang (CF) Fallon Sports Park Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects The following is a review of the meeting content: VL: Description of the park and the site constraints as well as the review of the Program Elements. The Task Force was then divided into three groups where base maps and cutouts of the program elements were provided for the members to design the layout of the park. Carducci Associates lead the groups and assisted the members in creating seven design schemes for the park. The designs were posted on the wall and the schemes were reviewed to identify what issues were most important to the members. A rating system was used to identify the members' design scheme preferences. Members were asked to place colored stickers on the drawings to identify their preferred scheme; the sticker identification is as follows: Red-3 points, Green- 2 points, Blue-1 point. The following Table displays the points given to each scheme. RED (multiply x 3) GREEN (multiply x 2) BLUE (multiply x 1) TOTAL weighted value) Fallon Sports Park - May 26, 2004 Preference Matrix for Design Charette Schemes SCHEME A B C t) 5 1 2 2 2 6 1 1 0 3 2 1 19 18 10 9 E 2 0 3 9 All schemes are listed in order of preference as chosen by the Task Force members. F 0 G 0 3 0 5 2 Schemes A and B were the favorites while Schemes C, D, and E closely followed. Because there is no clear third preference, we will develop a composite of Schemes C, D, and E identifying the best components and layouts of each. Attachment: Seven Design Schemes End of Meeting Notes Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, Inc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www,cardlucciassociates.cam david(f2}carducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN CAR© LAND A RCHI urri SCA PE TECTS - Date: To: Job Name - Job # Re MEETING NOTES 06-16-04 Hernia Lichtenstein Fallon Ranch Sports Park DUB03-02 Task Force Meeting #2 Tony Esterbrooks On Wednesday, June 16, 2004 a meeting with the Task Force was held at the City Hall Library Community Room to review three design schemes while receiving input from the Task Force Committee. See attached - meeting agenda. Attendees Name Diane Lowart (DL) Herma Lichtenstein (HL) X Rich Jochner (RJ) Anthony Casadonte (AC) lgnatus Chinn (IC) Roy Chowdhuri (RC) Greg Duncan (GD) Alan Elias (AE) David Galli (DG) X Michele Haubert (MH) Diane Hudson (DH) X Jim North (JN) Arlene Elizabeth Reffo (AR) X Kimberly Roth (KR) X Ellen Silky (ES) X Anupam Singh (AS) X Karen Y. Wang (KW) X Eric Weinhagen (EW) X Dave Chadbourne (DC) Jeff Lawrence (JL) X Shane Huntoon (SH) X Richard Guarienti (RG) X Connie Mack (CM) X Paul Silvas (PS) Brandon Chapin (BC) Danny Wang Kasie Hildenbrand Affiliation City of Dublin City of Dublin City of Dublin Dublin Ranch HOA (President) Summer Glen HOA Summer Glen HOA Dublin Ranch Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League Dublin Ranch Bocce, Dublin Little League Dublin Little League Summer Glen HOA (CFO) Dublin Green Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President) Greenbrier Dublin Ranch Developer (Mac Kay & Somps) Developer (Braddock & Logan) Special Interest Group (BMX) Parks and Community Services Commission Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission Senior Center Advisory committee Youth Advisory Committee PCSC CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.corn tony@a card ucciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN X Vince Lattanzi° (VL) X Bill Fee (BF) X Jin Kim (JK) Fallon Sports Park Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects The following is a review of the meeting content: Comments on Scheme A: BMX Course Comments: 1. Possibility of axis terminating at the BMX course 2. Parking, restroom, and playground at BMX 3. A portion of BMX should have a lower level of difficulty for younger kids 4. Location of BMX near fire station 5. Would be nice to have a level viewing area at the starting point Lighting Issues: 1. Prefer that lighting is further away from residential areas 2. Consider lighting at BMX course 3. Concerns with the light at baseball fields 4. Light the central parking areas 5. Turn sports fields at 45 degree angle for better lighting Playgounds: 1. Would like to have two large playgrounds, one in the upper terrace, one at lower terrace 2. Incorporate a gated play area for younger children 3. Have playgrounds located further away from bocce Sports Fields: 1. Association between bocce and tennis is preferred 2. Keep picnic and viewing areas associated with bocce courts. 3. Consider possibility of having a sand volleyball court 4. Prefer to have the cricket overlay located in the synthetic turf area. Locate the overlay away from parking for safety reasons 5. Incorporate synthetic turf into softball fields Misc. Design Issues: 1. Integrate walking/exercise into the park 2. A shorter walkway circulation route is preferred. 3. A portion of the park could be reserved for a picnic/trellis area Comments on Scheme B: BMX Course Comments: 1. Prefer to have BMX course located at lower terrace where it will become less visible 2. Do not like location of BMX. Would prefer to have it near the fire station Lighting Issues: 1.Light sports field away from housing Sports Fields: 1. Take out one baseball field and replace with fifth soccer field 2. Locate sand volleyball and bocce courts near soccer fields for possible expansion 3. Prefer to have a larger single level soccer for flexibility 4. Sand volleyball over turf 5. Flexible ball fields between 80 and 90 feet 6_ Possibility of replacing softball with roller hockey 7. Move basketball away from Little League fields 8. Prefer to have broken, terraced soccer fields to help reduce wind CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISC©, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.caraucciassaciates.com tony@carducciassOciates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN 9. Possibility of having neither hockey or tennis courts - Misc. Design Issues: 1. Locate parking near Little League, softball, and baseball fields 2. Concession and play areas located centrally to baseball complexes 3. Water fountains near field areas and restrooms 4, Prefer more organic layout to orthogonal layout 5. Spread parking out away from street 6. Place the restrooms adjacent to play areas 7. Place drop-off areas in parking Cots near sports fields Comments on Scheme C: BMX Course Comments: _ 1. Prefer this BMX location over scheme A or B 2. BMX needs 20 parking spots close by (50' to 60' away) 3. Locating BMX at fire station will help block wind 4. Provide temporary parking at BMX for two vehicles - Restroom Issues: 1. How many restrooms and where should they be located? 2. Consider unisex restrooms Sports Fields: 1. Practice areas for cricket should be like a pitch layout 2, Softball outfield fence is too close 3. Two task force members prefer to have four soccer fields versus three, while one member prefers three instead of four 4. Variety of adult sports is good to have 5. Could be difficult to schedule Little League and adult baseball leagues 6. Prefer grouped sports activity to mixed sports activity 7. Prefer sand volleyball courts 8. Idea of having hockey overlay tennis courts is not possible 9. Like artificial turf -is cheaper in long run Misc. Design Issues: 1, Cluster layout could be good and bad. Look and pro's and con 2. Like this playground layout. Prefer to have main playground at the upper level and smaller play area at lower level. Group play areas according to age. 3. Love the surrounding water 4. Look at Memorial Park in San Ramon Conclusions: - The task force members preferred Scheme B over Scheme A or C End of Meeting Notes Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, Inc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (4l5) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com tony@carducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN 1 MEETING NOTES CAE 11 uCcl I.AYD SCAPE ARCM TECTS Date: To: Job Name Job # Re By 09-10-04 Herma. Lichtenstein Fallon Ranch Sports Park DUB03-02 Task Force Meeting #3 Dave Andrews On Wednesday, September 8, 2004 a third public meeting was held with the Task Force to review the preferred scheme and get input from the Task Force and approval to continue with proposed plan. Refer to the attached Agenda. Attendees Name X Diane Lowart (DL) X Herma Lichtenstein (HL) X Rich Jochner (RJ) X-ALT Anthony Casadonte (MC)-X- MARY-ALT. Ignatus Chinn (IC) Roy Chowdhuri (RC) Greg Duncan (GD) X Alan Elias (AE) _ David Galli (DG) X Michele Haubert (MH) Diane Hudson (DH) Jim North (JN) Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR) Kimberly Roth (KR) x Ellen Silky (ES) x Anupam Singh (AS) X x x X X-ALT x x X X x Karen Y. Wang (KW) Eric Weinhagen (EW) Mary Dave Chadbourne (DC) Jeff Lawrence (JL) Shane Huntoon (SH) Richard Guarienti (RG) Connie Mack (CM) Paul Silvas (PS) -X- MARY SUE-ALT. Brandon Chapin (BC) Vince Lattanzio (VL) Bill Fee (BF) Jin Kim (JK) Dave Andrews (DA) Affiliation City of Dublin City of Dublin City of Dublin Dublin Ranch HOA (President) Summer Glen HOA Summer Glen HOA Dublin Ranch Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League Dublin Ranch Bocce, Dublin Little League Dublin Little League Summer Glen HOA (CFO) Dublin Green Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President) Greenbrier Dublin Ranch Senior Center Developer (Mac Kay & Somps) Developer (Braddock & Logan) Special Interest Group (BMX) Parks and Community Services Commission Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission Senior Center Advisory committee Youth Advisory Committee Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects _ Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com david@carclucciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN 2 Fallon Sports Park The following were initial comments from individual Task Force members in attendance: TURF _ • Synthetic turf is a great idea, promotes water conservation, no irrigation needed. ■ Bring synthetic turf samples next time DRAINAGE • Stream corridor is not used for site drainage. • Be careful when draining the terraces — do not drain upper terraces to lower terraces, specifically the soccer fields as there are clay soils which will create subsurface sheet drainage possibly to lower terraced fields. Ted Fairfield Park drainage is terrible. ■ Field drainage options: - Sand channel — - Sand field - Synthetic turf • Each field to be a separate watershed • Drainage to be accepted and directed to major storm drainage system at Fallon Road and Central Parkway BMX • Need electricity to BMX course, but not necessarily for lighting, as lighting is not required. 1 inch water hook-ups (QCVs) needed at the inside of each turn. Drainage should occur at the inside of each turn. Linear drains (French drains) could also line the track in between the straight-aways (said either could be done) • is the BMX a fully open area or is it fenced? — will be fenced all around, minimum 4' high chain link fence • Need sedimentation and erosion control at BMX LIGHTING • Light only major connector paths consistent with other city parks • Keep lighting at perimeter entries and parking lots, but keep to minimum where possible (ie. parking lots) —do not light in park • Provide lighting for nighttime events (therefore might need some path lights from/to specific areas that would be used at night • Operation times for park lighting - Games start as late as 7:48 or 8:30 - Possibly have field lights go off at 10:00pm - Existing city park rules have operation times dawn to dusk - Existing city park rules have field tights turn off at 10:00pm - Keep in mind that sports are seasonal • Keep lighting in center of park - Concerned with light glare - Use glare reduction systems if possible Light the parking lots and especially the pedestrian bridge CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES. INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com dauid@carducciassaciates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN 3 NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS • Would like to see access points from all around (likes what is shown on plans), but would specifically like connection of open spaces at southern edge (across Central Parkway) ■ Possibly make a second pedestrian bridge connection at Gleason/Lockhart intersection ■ Provide pedestrian street crossings by fire station and at all neighborhood connection points WATER/ART FEATURES • Are there any water features anywhere? = Would like to see art features and water features throughout the park - Water features possibly at entry Possibly misting water features at the trellis and picnic areas as comfort options a Would like to see water features and restrooms at picnic areas • Have "special" things/places/objects outside of sport fietd items to promote attraction to other parts/facets of park and to create non -sporting areas of interest = Is it possible to take advantage of slopes for water elements, surrounding sporting areas? FENCING • Are the fields fenced? - fences needed for tournaments - softball and baseball needs fences for big games or tournaments or teams - fences are needed to attract teams and tournaments, they will not come without the fences PARK DEVELOPMENT • The city has new standards for soil amendment _ ▪ What is the financial reality of Fallon, especially, in terms of Emerald Glen Park, if the !money is not available yet for Emerald Glen Park what is supposed to help pay for its construction costs - developers pay through impact fees - neighborhood park fees - community park fees - the city has taken everything into account, and the park will happen - problems at EGP are because they need more manpower, not because the funds are not available - each phase takes at least 3 years to plan, design, and build • The City sees Fallon as a premier sports park ■ See ground -breaking to potentially be in 2-3 years after first phase funding is approved by the council • Private development west of Fallon Park is working from west to east - Might be able to make interim intersection of Fallon and Central if new Fallon alignment is not constructed yet - Pedestrian bridge axis/location is adjustable dependent upon elementary school and intersection locations • Stream corridor to continue on south side of Central Parkway (MacKay & Sumps to provide plans) • At Lockhart 12' or 16' walkway adjacent to corridor? Sidewalk becomes corridor walkway ADDITIONAL STEMS • Is it possible to have shade structures in ptay area itsetf? • Would like pathways to be large enough to allow for bikes. Strollers, and people to move easily • Provide shade trees/areas by soccer fields and other fields for viewing • Use embankments for seating opportunities • Provide equipment sheds for each sport where possible (maybe the 8' x 20" containers) ■ Can we make the soccer goals permanent? - This might be a conflict with the cricket fields • Walking/running path could have a softer surface for jogging, possibly DG, resin paving, or dirt CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES. [NC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com david(a'carducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN 4 • Provide areas for celebratory gathering (BBQ, parties, sports team awards, jamborees, team/league award ceremonies, parades, etc) • Bike racks throughout (allow for bike racks at major hubs and at Little League, softball, baseball, and soccer hubs) • Provide for separate toddler (2-5yrs) playground areas as well as older kid [school age) playgrounds - Try to fence in toddler areas or at least have them secured for safety - Have places for parents to sit within or around these toddler playground areas (shaded) - Adult areas within play areas - No rocks/granite or dangerous objects in play areas - Provide form of immediate shade while large/planted trees are growing in (plant larger trees) • Recommend to use sand opposed to wood fiber or rubber because it is a bit too hard sometimes • Make sure there are BBQ pits at picnic areas • Provide stairways between landings of sloped walks at Gleason Drive and Fallon Road • For east vs. west town league games, would want to have 2 batting cages for Little League • Are the Little League batting cages owned by LL or by city? - They are not a cornmercial venture • Cricket needs batting cages too (net cages that are removable and will be installed and removed each. time), but would like sleeves for its placement and possibly have electrical connections for bowling machine which they will provide PHASING • Lin Family responsibility for Fallon Road • Mass grading and stream bed corridor may happen in 2 years time • Stream corridor might get built first due to permit obligations, so would make sense to build Lockhart or part of Lockhart along with it Possible phasing considerations per Carducci & Associates:. • Roads • Utilities into hubs • Perimeter trees and stream corridor planting • Mass grading • Soccer fields • Parking as needed (build -out sooner than later) • Restrooms along with needs • Meet community needs • Soccer growing at 30% per year • Coordinate with developers concerning their responsibilities to build roads as soon as possible • Consider perimeter roads paths and access as 1'` Phase and develop from perimeter into park area Phasina reouests per Task Force • Picnic areas, small areas, walks, for immediately surrounding residents • Build pathways in first phase • North side, then work southward • Perimeter work • BMX in first stages as it is new to area • It should be a community park first, then can grow to complete its sport park needs • Infrastructure first • Little League first as it is on the north side where the roads are already built, plus there is no Little League at Emerald Glen Park so have the need to build them first CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www,carducciassociates.com david@carduc:ciassociates.com. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN 5 ■ Possibly have the section of Lockhart from Gleason to upper entry be built, as to provide access to upper terrace and Little League fields Because Central Parkway might happen first, then maybe use lower parking with sloped walks or roads leading up to upper terrace (Little League Fields}; then fill in as if in north/south halves(build eastern half first) • Just make it usable whatever parts are possible End of Meeting Notes Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, inc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com david@carducciassociates.corn LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN 1 MEETING NOTES cNR43 I.NNO ARCH] Date: 10-8-04 To: Herma Lichtenstein Job Name Fallon Ranch Sports Park Job # DUB03-02 Re Task Force Meeting #4 By Tony Esterbrooks On Wednesday, October 6, 2004 a fourth public meeting was held with the Task Force to review the preferred _ scheme and get input from the Task Force and approval to continue with the proposed plan. Refer to the attached Agenda. Attendees Name Affiliation X Diane Lowart (DL) City of Dublin X Herma Lichtenstein (HL) City of Dublin X Rich Jochner (RJ) _ City of Dublin Anthony Casadonte (MC) Dublin Ranch HOA (President) Ignatus Chinn (IC) Summer Glen HOA _ Roy Chowdhuri (RC) Greg Duncan (GD) X Alan Elias (AE) David Galli (DG) Michele Haubert (MH) X Diane Hudson (DH) Jim North (JN) Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR) X Kimberly Roth (KR) ) X Ellen Silky (ES) X Anupam Singh (AS) Karen Y. Wang (KW) Eric Weinhagen (EW) Mary X Dave Chadbourne (DC) Jeff Lawrence (JL) X Shane Huntoon (SH) X Richard Guarienti (RG) X Connie Mack (CM) ` Paul Silvas (PS) X Brandon Chapin (BC) X Vince Lattanzio (VL) X Bill Fee (BF) X Jin Kim (JK) X Tony Esterbrooks(TE) Summer Glen HOA Dublin Ranch Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League Dublin Ranch Bocce, Dublin Little League Dublin Little League Summer Glen HOA (CFO) Dublin Green Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President) Greenbrier Dublin Ranch Senior Center Developer (Mac Kay & Somps) Developer (Braddock & Logan) Special interest Group (BMX) Parks and Community Services Commission Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission Senior Center Advisory committee Youth Advisory Committee Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com tony@earducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN Fallon Sports Park The following were comments from individual Task Force members in attendance: DRAINAGE • Ensure that drainage is effective on ball fields • Subsurface drainage will be used that ties into a main storm drain line • Concern with Ted Fairfield Park and the fact that it does not drain well. Task force does not want this situation at Fallon Sports Park ▪ Synthetic turf is a permeable surface and will work well with drainage plan - BMX • A rough grade for the BMX course can be used initially LIGHTING • Most of the lighted sports fields lighting would be constructed during Phase 1. There is concern that adjacent future neighbors would be upset with construction of sports lighting after the purchase their property. It is better for lights to already be present before new developments are finished near lighted sports fields NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS • Toll Brothers will start development on the west side of the site. They will be responsible for the curb and stream corridor along Lockhart linking Lockhart Lane from curb to stream corridor - PLAY AREA • The consideration of a tot lot near the Little League and softball hubs may be dangerous due to balls flying into the play areas ADDITIONAL ITEMS • Incorporation of a space or opportunity for on -site staff to manage park facilities. Due to large size of park, it may be important for someone to be present to monitor the park • Need to understand that the park stays on track as a sports park before considering other items PHASING • Phase 1 to include 2 Little League fields and 2 lighted softball fields. Two lighted and synthetic turf Soccer fields should be included in Phase 1 due to a high demand as well • Most lighted fields should be built first • Include the priority of demand/need for Phase 1. For example phasing must meet demands for Dublin and East Dublin Little League. There is currently high demand for Little League and that demand will most likely continue to grow. Little league can use softball fields as a temporary solution • BMX course can be a rough graded area included in Phase 1 • The time frames for each should be determined by next meeting. Mostly depends on the funding avai}able, but are probably look at 2-3 years for each phase • Come to final conclusions on Phase 1 without having to be locked into Phases 2 and 3, leave the rest open for future phases • Phasing for alternative 1 looks good 2 End of Meeting Notes - Attendees are to notify Carducci & Associates, Inc., in writing, of discrepancies in these minutes. CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES. INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 W w W. c and uc c i Assoc iates.com tony@carducciassociates.com - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN CArto I AND ANC 111 C I SCAPE EC TS MEETING NOTES Date: 11-03-04 - To: Herma Lichtenstein Job Name Job # - Re *14 14. By Fallon Ranch Sports Park DUB03-02 Task Force Meeting #5 Dave Andrews 1 On Wednesday, November 11, 2004, a fifth public meeting was held with the Task Force to review the final plan Phasing Plan and provide an opportunity for them to select their preferred design components that they would like to see in the park if there are budget restrictions that may call for their deletion. Attendees Name Affiliation X Diane Lowell (DL) City of Dublin X Herma Lichtenstein (HL) City of Dublin Rich Jochner (RJ) City of Dublin Anthony Casadonte (MC) Dublin Ranch HOA (President) Ignatus Chinn (IC) Summer Glen HOA Roy Chowdhuri (RC) Greg Duncan (GD) X Alan Elias (AE) David Galli (DG) Michele Haubert (MH) X Diane Hudson (DH) Jim North (JN) Arlene Elizabeth Raffo (AR) X Kimberly Roth (KR) X Ellen Silky (ES) X Anupam Singh (AS) Karen Y. Wang (KW) Eric Weinhagen (EW) Mary X Dave Chadbourne (DC) Jeff Lawrence (JL) X Shane Huntoon (SF!) X Richard Guarienti (RG) X Connie Mack (CM) Paul Silvas (PS) Brandon Chapin (BC) X Vince Lattanzi° (VL) X Bill Fee (BF) X Jin Kim (JK) X Dave Andrews (DA) Summer Glen HOA Dublin Ranch Dublin Ranch, Dublin United Soccer League Dublin Ranch Bocce, Dublin Little League Dublin Little League Summer Glen HOA (CFO) Dublin Green Dublin Ranch, Dublin Little League Northern California Cricket Association (Vice President) Greenbriar Dublin Ranch Senior Center Developer (Mac Kay & Somps) Developer (Braddock & Logan) Special Interest Group (BMX) Parks and Community Services Commission Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission Senior Center Advisory committee Youth Advisory Committee Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects Carducci Landscape Architects CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 �., www.carducciassociates.com tony@carducczassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN 2 Trellis Expansion refers to the expansion at the soccer area, the bocce area, and the volleyball area Little League and softball will have shade structures What are the parameters to make something cost effective (i.e. scale of item's price)? • More an issue of what the needs and wants are. • For example — synthetic soccer fields may be one of the most expensive items, but the budget will be adjusted if people really want it Why is synthetic important or wanted? • Can play in rain...the field does not get damaged as natural turf does and is ready to use immediately The City will find a way to make budget happen if people want it SH - Water Features are very important (particularly for summer) Some iterns could be added later but some can't be • But could add bocce or par course later • But special paving it would be best to add now • Could add trellis later • Water feature might be able to be piped and added later, but still may not be best idea • Synthetic turf needs to be done now...not later Other par courses have been taken out...people not really using • How big would this be...would it be strung out along the trail or concentrated • Long courses typically don't get used as much...concentrated equipment seem to be better This one would be concentrated CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES. 1NC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941.33 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com tony@carducciassociates.com carducciassnciates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN SECTION IX. APPENDICES c. TASK FORCE DESIGN CONCEPTS CARDUCCI & .qp9CIATES. INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA `J' FALLON SPORTS PARK DUSLIN., CALIFORNIA IXc-1 • RED 5 GREEN 2 BLUE 0 TOTAL 19 (weighted) 4 SCHEME A RED 1 GREEN 6 BLUE 3 TOTAL 18 (weighted) • • • SCHEME B RED 2 GREEN 1 SLUE 2 TOTAL 10 (weighted) SCHEME C RED 2 GREEN 1 BLUE 1 TOTAL 9 (weighted) SCHEME D RED 2 GREEN 0 BLUE 3 TOTAL 9 (weighted) • SCHEME E RED 0 GREEN 1 BLUE 3 TOTAL 5 (weighted) 1 RED Q GREEN 1 BLUE Or TOTAL 2 (weighted) SCHEME G e>PeN) alb SECTION IX. APPENDICES d, TASK FORCE MEETING HANDOUTS • CONTEXT (INTRODUCTORY MEETING) • SITE ANALYSIS (INTRODUCTORY MEETING) • IMAGERY 1 & 2 (MEETING 1) • MASTER PLAN (MEETING 5) • IMAGERY PLAN (MEETING 5) • LIGHTING DIAGRAM (MEETING 5) • GRADING PLAN(MEETING 5) • SITE SECTIONS (MEETING 4) • PHASING PLAN (MEETING 5) CARDUCCI g55pC)gTES„ INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FALLON; SPORTS PARK DUBLIN% CALIFORNIA e, . IXd-1 VICINITY AND EXISTING CONDITION 0-3N FALLON SPORTS PARK FUTURE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP rwe. SITE ANALYSIS X Di.Ca Mori ki SITE PLAN ADJACENT LAND USE AND VIEWS OEM EAST view OF THE HILLS SOUTH VIEW OF THE MOUNTAINS 8% FALLON SPORTS PARK Dublin, California TOPOGRAPHY SLOPES 5%0R GREATER tla VOT ELEVATIONS ,1.11s PeoPosEa mous SPOT ELEVATIONS GEOLOGY WA MeT1FLCIAL NDSUDE MRS OLLINum ALLLALIUM TASSAIARA FOPMATION LLORTESO LOCATION EMEt."-rNV, IN4•414.•• F..."7.217"17. :71ALTI 47:7:07:. eee.")....., a2Mat.• YttriEll ...riportim.• Rm. nil 4.n...ft d..••••• 0 .1.r mom. Wow ,-....orin•••••••.—..,4 m•••••-•... HYDROLOGY SWALE EQUINOX DAY • NIGHT .4111 46.-4;1 MARCH EGUINOX. DAY • NiGIIT SEETE/ABER SOLSTICE- ONGFST DAYS TUNE 14IGI4EST SUN ALTITUDE SOLSTICE. SHOW-6T DAYS OCEMUI LOWEST SUN &MIME WIND/SUN PREVAILING WIND WWI Spoils 74%1 fL• • iamr 0 9 gA =54PS" 177 ...•1 SITE ANALYSIS IR = EAST VIEW OF THE HILLS SITE IMAGERY PEDESTRIAN PATH to FALLON SPORTS PARK Dublin, California PAVILION BRIDGE STREAM CORRIDOR BASEBALL TERRACE SEATING CIRCULATION FALLON SPORTS PARK Dublin, California SOFTBALL LITTLE LEAGUE SOCCER BMX VOLLEYBALL 311 BASKETBALL BOCCE PLAY AREA IMAGERY ‘11 FALLON SPORTS PARK 10u11 MIDI rL • ttIMIN]4( Ylnl[0u! II w1 1*! ! u F TIMI NECTW CRMWIRM. Mt[IwR lla� WWI[ 1t0CIT1y t4I NE10IMO C , COMO 1.• TY F\ 'o'ywn ,.t1f'1 ss ! I II Yad' if I10 TAtDI ii G HCD IO[e11 IId.r d iOCCE! '�yL EI us ,wlwnl[ ry ntn(fl[ WTI OHO IIOTTIOw1 In[[,. I .0CC.1 4 I I L I u!e rw1uw eawuly ellmiwo.l Ifleiew eve, a NIIOUIO•wRO COMSICTrON AOYIMILI4 t HAIA SOMALI, iuGnPt6� tl O1*OITUMIY 11t00M/ CONC•FIION SOMA!. ACclwl T1111 of. qtttl. •ItCI oES, II,c .4. •I.in ..EletlH r.cla IOs fN Ta fl+!a am.Vc.. �EIHONI}FOI00 CT!na11 fi= I•Lre IMI r �j F' wW011.10011 e 0,ON 80 1 0 240 a FALLON SPORTS PARK SLOPED WALK TO UPPER TERRACE-- HBORN co NECTION PLAY EQUIPMENT IMF AMPHITHEATER HILL SEATWALLS • CROUP PICNIC * WITH AR ,y 1150 FECIRE INTERACTIVE WATER FEATURE TERRACED SEATING TERRACED HILLSIoe LOWER T ` ACE PARKFNG FALLON SPORTS PARK LIGHTING DIAGRAM CITY OF DUBLIN 1411.1141c1 C fCICCIl 40CClk 11434Inl1.0 4 11flI0X311C k i161.r303 1.G3.I3c1 •OYCN70111 I[41 .414 41+CN!C.l4G Iruu '00010 emoonf CON 013 II... iI I I i0Nik6) *1C4 fNON1;01 p it Kw AY VIA"11 ,ue.rrl tN1M��CC'I1CIN `OM*1[OI F A L L O N RANCH SPORTS PARK SITEPERIMETER SECTIONS V' 0 0 KEY MAP .o 1.4 taal tJg' 1' � f LOCKHART 6' LANE 12' WIDE MULTI -USE PATH LOCKHART 6 LANE 12' WIDE MULTI -USE GLEASON DRIVE ATH �r fir• 3,,1 15,3,1 SLOPE SLOPE 76' WIDE STREAM CORRIDOR 3:1 15' 3:1 10' PATH SLOPE SLOPE 70' WIDE STREAM CORRIDOR 3:1 15' 311 SLOPE SLOPE -/- CENTRAL PARKWAY PATH r ) • 'r 3:1 SLOPE/ RIPARIAN PLANTING PARKING LOT PLAZA/FIELDS 70' WIDE STREAM CORRIDOR 3:1 SLOPE/RIPARIAN PLANTING 10' 3:1 LITTLE LEAGUE PATH SLOPE FIELDS 1.0 .t \FALL°N few ccieLEv: - -- 3 EAGUE B 1" 4 CENTRAL PARKWA CONCESSION CONCESSION/ RESTROOM DROP-OFF/ LAWN PARKING PLAY AREA LITTLE LEAGUE REST• ROOM SECTIONS gj SOFTBALL FIELDS FALLON ROAD GLEASON DRIVE STREAM CORRIDOR PINES BMX TRACK WALK REST- TRELLIS BOCCE TRELLIS BOCCE TRELLIS SAND TRELLIS ROOM VOLLEY- BALL 3:1 SLOPE FALLON ROAD CENTRAL PARKWAY Mom • FALLON SPORTS PARK GRADING PLAN 1 frees 40▪ 111.1.1. ca errr ,r hmerererrr LMT Cr OR.PPeS • i!) C.CSJCI ft er RNISN GONTQ.R ^J' Ih'eR514Li FIN+ GGNrprt n nrteRJ.L. • Pea514 SPOT MSVATION PATMNAY IEI'.ISOPV 1 iaNE3ir AvtA LOGAnON CAMSAINT Rf0.1:5T AR":A 4:CATION ti Il ll (E) Fallon Road i41 UmM,UICIRRIa MIIi'� 1 III Ali Ito* P14 .1• a ao 140 FALLON RANCH SPORTS PARK PHASING DIAGRAM CITY OF DUBLIN o Wee YeeflOe ENTRY NOMTN e0000 4 COMMECr.OM (OwLt RE[e4TeuN ex I NMGM40F1,000 CONNeCTOM e444 EOe NMI\ reaeuH 4 Nro.Modo CON NtGTOM 4* , -' I. 4IliP 1.- ' 'WCfnuN ▪ +-•� • ro�.ma ,� PHASE.] �r4 +4 • s _wR• 44,4 UPPER TERRACE* 4>►i PHASE 4 1 +A s u PHASING CONCEPT FOLLOW ROAD DEVELOPMENT PROVIDE A VARIETY OF FACILITIES AND USES BUILD LIGHTED FIELDS AND COURTS FIRST TO INCREASE {� USABILITY PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OFF FALLON ROAD FOR SUBSEQUENT PHASE DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1 I tl 1l iT-l- -N !*'+T •Allr LOWER TERRACE. (I i PHASE LOWE. ENrer L.I* N•OIM000 GONMICMOM no i McNNece. SUBSEQUENT PHASES N000 1 eoMNEcnoN J (ORDER OF DEVELOPMENT TO BE DETERMINED) ROAD AND STREAM CORRIDOI DEVELOPMENT. (FISCAL YEAR) GL EASON DRIVE -COMPLETED LOCKHART LANE • COMPLETE 2005/2006 STREAM CORRIDOR - CONSTRUCT ALONG WITH LOCKHART LANE {INCLUDING STREAM CORRIDOR ON GLEASON DRIN FALLON ROAD - NORTHERN HALF OF ROAD, 54" RCP, AND SOUTHERN HALF MASS GRADING, PLUS 2 LANES -COMPLETE 2004/2005 - WIDEN AND COMPLETE FALLON ROAD 2006/2007 CENTRAL PARKWAY •COMPLETE 2006/2007 PHASE 1 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TWO LITTLE LEAGUE FIELDS WITH ASSOCIATED PLAZA, PICNIC, AND RESTROOM/CONCESSION TWO LIGHTED SOFTBALL FIELDS WITH ASSOCIATED PLAZA, PICNIC, AND RESTROOM, FOUR LIGHTED TENNIS COURTS FOUR LIGHTED BASKETBALL COURTS TWO LIGHTED NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELDS WITH SYNTHETIL TURF (OPTIONAL) ART AND WATER FEATURES UPPER TERRACE PARKING LOT UPPER TERRACE LOOP WALKING TRAIL UPPER TERRACE PARK IDENTIFICATION FEATURES BMX COURSE • ROUGH GRADING IN PHASE 1 • ■��+�-� P A R 1( A [ ..Lne,"uii or. 81.4010,000 COMM/CFO.. 4 4 0I tip UPPER TERRACE ,`' -_ -. i , • • ACTIVITY HUB (INCLUDING PICNIC PLAZA, PLAY AREA, AND RESTROOMS % 1 • TWO LITTLE LEAGUE FIELDS { • TWO SOFTBALL FIELDS • 11MM COURSE t •' NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS 9 • PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OFF OF # -L:a FALLON ROAD • njj ■ LOWER TERRACE "• .4 • PARKING AND ACTIVITY HUE {INCLUDING, PICNIC PLAZA, PLAY AREA, AND RESTROOMS • TWO NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELDS WITH CRICKET OVERU • ONE LIGHTED BASEBALL FIELD • FOUR LIGHTED BOCCE COURTS TWO ADDITIONAL LIGHTED BOCCE COURTS IOPT1ONAI • FOUR SAND VOLLEYBALL COURTS • ART AND WATER FEATURES • NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS • PARK IDENTIFICATION FEATURES • COMPLETE UPPER AND LOWER TERRACE 0 100 200 300 fra SECTION IX. APPENDICES e. IRRIGATION AND RECYCLED WATER DEMAND ANALYSIS • DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DIS- TRICT WATER FLOW AND PRESSURE INFORMATION CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES. INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA C .A R E. ANP A RC ki cc� APE T ECTS Analysis of the Irrigation Water Requirements Fallon Sports Park The following is an analysis of the irrigation water requirements for the Fallon Sports Park. The analysis is based on the following data: Approximate park area: 62.44 acres Approximate turf area: 40.00 acres Approximate unplanted area: 22.44 acres 1 cubic feet of water = 7.48052 gallons irrigation water will be recycled water. Recycled water static pressure is approximately 130 psi at the corner of Fallon Road and Gleason Drive and 74 psi at the corner of Central Parkway and Lockhart Street according to the memos dated 3-22-05 from Rudy Portugal of the Dublin San Ramon Services District This analysis ignores the use of synthetic turf for two soccer fields (3.67 acres). Synthetic turf would save water consumption and optimize maintenance resources and reduce impacts of overuse of the other turf fields. Phase 1 Upper Terrace Phase Lower Terrace Phase Total Park Acres 26.42 14.41 19.75 60.58 Street Frontage Turf Acres Acres 0 0.68 1.18 1.86 17.00 11.00 12.00 40.00 The maximum evaporation rate would be approximately 0.25 inches per day or 7.75 inches per month (July). The plant factor for turf would be 80% of the maximum evaporation rate. The irrigation efficiency would he 80% The watering window would be 10 PM to 6 AM or 8 hours. Turf summer irrigation requirements: 40.00 acres x 0.25 inches per day x 0.80 plant factor divided by 0.80 irrigation efficiency x 27,154 gallons per acre inch = 271,154 gallons per day. 8-hour window requirements: 271.154 gallons per day divided by 480 minutes = 565 GPM or approximately 600 GPM Provide two irrigation water connections, two at the upper terrace to make use of the static water pressure for recycled water of approximately 130 psi. Phase 1 and Upper Terrace Turf summer irrigation requirements: _ 28.00 acres x 0.25 inches per day x 0.80 plant factor divided by 0.80 irrigation efficiency x 27,154 gallons per acre inch = 190,078 gallons per day. CARDUCC1 & ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 i4151 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.cor bill@carducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN 8-hour window requirements: 190,078 gallons per day divided by 480 minutes = 396 GPM or approximately 400 GPM Lower Terrace Turf summer irrigation requirements: 12.00 acres x 0.25 inches per day x 0.80 plant factor divided by 0.80 irrigation efficiency x 27,154 gallons per acre inch = 81,462 gallons per day. 8-hour window requirements: 81,462 gallons per day divided by 480 minutes = 170 GPM or approximately 200 GPM CARDUCCI : ASSOCIATES, INC. 555 BEACH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133 (415) 674-0990 FAX (415) 674-0999 www.carducciassociates.com bill@carducciassociates.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ■ PLANNING • URBAN DESIGN • IRRIGATION DESIGN URGENT Need By: Date Fm. r Time Request Taken By: Dublin San Ramon Services District 7051 Dublin Blvd., Dublin, CA 94568 Telephone: (925) 828-0515 FAX: (925) 829-1180 FACSIMILE INFORMATION TRANSMITTAL WATER FLOW AND PRESSURE INFORMATION REQUEST _ No. of Pages (incl. transmittal page): 1 To: Name Herma Lichtenstein Company City of Dublin Phone 833-6645 FAX 833-6651 almr Location (Address & Cross Streets): Date of Request: 3-22-05 Date of Response: 3-23-05 Response by: Rudy Portugal Assistant Engineer 925-875-2251 RCP Initials Fallon Sports Park — Fallon Road & Gleason Drive — Potable Water Pressure Zone 2 Recycled Water Pressure Zone 2 In response to your request, we ran our hydraulic model to determine water pressures at the above noted location. The results are as follows: Potable Water: Static Pressure 90 psi Residual Pressure 87 psi at a flow of 1500 Recycled Water: Static Pressure Residual Pressure 130 psi psi at a flow of gPm gPm Actual water pressures may vary depending on delivery pressures from water wholesaler (Zone 7), system demands, and the dynamic status of facilities. This information does not relieve Requestor of responsibility to perform due diligence. Actual field test is recommended. Additional notes/comments: Should you have additional questions, please contact us at the above number. H..115ER5I8UGTAWORMS \kirrfm. [L;g4C:r Form.doc URGENT I Need By: Date Request Taken By: Time Dublin San Ramon Services District 7051 Dublin Blvd., Dublin, CA 94568 Telephone: (925) 828-0515 FAX: (925) 829-1180 FACSIMILE INFORMATION TRANSMITTAL WATER FLOW AND PRESSURE INFORMATION REQUEST No. of Pages (incl. transmittal page): 1 To: Name Herma Lichtenstein Company City of Dublin Phone 833-6645 FAX 833-6651 Location (Address & Cross Streets): Date of Request: Date of Response: Response by; 3-22-05 3-23-05 Rudy Portugal Assistant Engineer 925-875-2251 RCP initraiS Fallon Sports Park — Central Pkwy & Lockhart St — Potable Water Pressure Zone 2 Recycled Water Pressure Zone 1 In response to your request, we ran our hydraulic model to determine water pressures at the above noted location. The results are as follows: Potable Water: Static Pressure Residual Pressure 135 128 psi psi at a flow of Recycled Water: Static Pressure 74 psi Residual Pressure psi at a flow of 1500 gpm Actual water pressures may vary depending on delivery pressures from water wholesaler (Zone 7), system demands, and the dynamic status of facilities. This information does not relieve Requestor of responsibility to perform due diligence. Actual field test is recommended. — Additional notes/comments: Should you have additional questions, please contact us at the above ttuinbel% N=4lSERS�8IAGTANWCIRMS-FireQorr Requdt F v.doc SECTION IX. APPENDICES f. COST ESTIMATE CARDUCCI & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FALLON SPORTS PARK �. TiDUBLII4' CALIFORNIA OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS - Fallon Sports Park Cost Estimate Summary item Phase 1 Upper Terrace Phase Lower Terrace Phase Cost Estimate Summary Total Park Construction Costs Total I $9,531,468 $4,970,293 $5,636,530 $20,138,291 1 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS - Fallon Sports Park Item Qty unit PHASE 1 Cost Total Phase 1 Construction (26.42 acres) 1. Little League Field (2) Backstop 2 EA $50,000.00 $100,000 Grading 91,000 EA $1.00 $91,000 Infield Mix & Warning Track 26,000 EA $2.00 $52,000 Lawn & Irrigation 65,000 EA $2.00 $130,000 Score Keeper's Booth 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000 Scoreboard 2 EA $20,000.00 $40.000 Dugouts 4 EA $10,000.00 $40,000 Bullpens 4 EA $10,000.00 $40,000 Foul poles 4 EA $3,000.00 $12,000 Bleachers 4 EA $4,000.00 $16,000 Trench Drain 350 LF $50.00 $17,500 Perimeter Fencing & Mowband 1.300 LF $40.00 $52,000 Subsurface Drainage 2,200 LE $30.00 $66,000 2. Softball (2) Backstop 2 EA $50,000.00 $100,000 Grading 174,000 EA $1.00 $174,000 Infield Mix & Warning Track 46,000 EA $2,00 $92,000 Lawn & Irrigation 128,000 EA $2.00 $256,000 Score Keeper's Booth 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000 Scoreboard 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000 Dugouts 4 EA $10,000.00 $40,000 Bullpens 4 EA $10,000.00 $40,000 Foul poles 4 EA $3,000.00 $12,000 Bleachers 4 EA $4,000.00 $16,000 Trench Drain 350 LF $50.00 $17,500 Perimeter Fencing & Mowband 2,000 LF $40.00 $80,000 Subsurface Drainage 2.200 LF $30.00 $66,000 Softball Field Lighting 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000 _ 3. Basketball Court 4 EA $50,000.00 $200,000 Fencing AC Paving w/ Color Course Backboard / Hoops Basketball Court Lights 1 LS $46,000.00 $46,000 4. Soccer Field( Natural Turf) (80,000 SF) 2 EA $320,000.00 $640,000 Grading, Lawn & Irrigation Sand Drainage Goals Soccer Field Lighting 1 'LS $332,400.00 $332,400 5. Tennis 4 EA $60,000.00 $240,000 Tennis Center Striping AC Paving w/ Color Course Fencing Nets Tennis Court Lighting 1 LS $90,000.00 $90,000 1 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS - Fallon Sports Park PHASE 1 Item 6, Office / Restroom Structure (2 Fixtures) -Prefabricated 7. Restroom / Concession Structure -Prefabricated 8. Shade Structure 9. Conc Curb at Parking Lot. 10. Parking Lot (259 cars) Striping & Signage Wheel Stops Accessible Parking Grading 11. Conc Paving 12. Conc Paving 13. Upper Entry Drive Asphalt Paving Concrete Paving 14. Upper Terrace Entry Feature 15. Signage ! Identity Feature 16. Conc Steps & Handrails 17, Upper Terrace Culvert Entry Gateway / Railing AC Paving 18. Lower- Pedestrian Entry Pedestrian Bridge -Prefabricated Special Conc Paving Conc Paving Pilasters 19. Conc Paving for paths due to slopes 20. BBQ Grills -Small 21. Picnic Table --Square (Upper Terrace) 22. Seatwalls 23. Bench 24. Bike Rack 25. Storage Container 26. Drinking Fountain 27. Fire Hydrant 28. Drain Inlet 29, Storm Drainage 30. Sanitary Sewer 31. Electrical Service 32. Underground Electrical Work 33. Pathway Lights 34. Concession/ Restroom Building (Electrical/ Lights) 35. Restroom Building (Electrical/ Lights) 36. Parking Area Lights 37. Potable Water Service (1 Connection) 38, Potable Water System 39. Fire Service (1 Connection) 40, Recycled Water Service (1 Connection) 41. Telephone Service Qty Unit Cost Total 1 EA $100,000.00 $100,000 2 EA $200,000.00 $400,000 2 EA $25,000.00 $50,000 2,625 LF $20.00 $52,500 94,835 SF $4.50 $426,758 15,288 SF $6.50 119,707 SF $5.50 4,831 SF $4.50 6,935 SF $6.50 1 LS $50,000.00 2 EA $50,000,00 795 SF $75.00 1 LS $150,000.00 1 LS $200,000,00 3,200 SF $6.50 4 EA $300.00 8 EA $1,500.00 75 CY $1,000.00 50 EA $1,500.00 6 EA $1,500.00 3 EA $4,000.00 6 EA $5,000.00 1 EA $10,000.00 24 EA $1,500.00 1 LS $300,000.00 1 LS $50,000.00 1 LS $67,500.00 1 LS $200,000.00 1 LS $65.000.00 1 LS $22,580.00 1 LS $6,000.00 1 LS $54,400.00 1 LS $20,000.00 1 LS $28,000.00 1 LS $15,000.00 1 LS $20,000.00 1 LS $10,000.00 $99,372 $658,389 $21,740 $45,078 $50,000 $100,000 $59,625 $150.000 $200.000 $20,800 $1,200 $12,000 $75,000 $75,000 $9,000 $12,000 $30,000 $10,000 $36,000 $300,000 $50,000 $67,500 $200,000 $65,000 $22,580 $6,000 $54,400 $20,000 $28,000 $15,000 $20,000 $10, 000 2 OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS - Fallon Sports Park PHASE 1 Item 42. Lawn (Excludes Sport Fields) 43. Irrigation Controllers 44. Irrigation 45. 24" Box tree 46. SWPPPfErosion Control 47. Basketball Court Lights 48. Maintenance (90 days) Phase 1 Park Construction Costs Phase 1 Optional Items Not included in Estimate Qty Unit Cost Total' 375,332 SF $1.00 $375,332 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 375,332 SF $1.00 $375,332 1,049 EA $250.00 $262,250 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000 1 LS $46,000.00 $46,000 375,332 SF $0.15 $56,300 Subtotal $8,146, 554 Bonding & Insurance (2%) $162,931 Mobilization & General Conditions (5%) $407,328 Contingency (10°!°) $814,655 TOTAL $9,531,468 Phase 1 Cost Per Acre $360,767 1. Soccer Field (Change to Synthetic Turf) (80,000 SF) 2 EA $750,000.00 $1, 500, 000 (Refer to enclosed Operating Cost Analysis) Subtotal $1,500,000 Bonding & Insurance (2%) $30, 000 Mobilization & General Conditions (5%) $75, 000 Contingency (10%) $150,000 Total Phase 1 Optional Items Not Included in Estimate $1, 755,000 Notes: 1) This Estimate excludes utility provider connection fees, Construction Contingency, changes due to unforeseen conditions, work related to hazardous materials, Design Fees. Engineering, Inspection, Testing, and Etc. 2) Unit Costs for elements include a 17% markup for general contractor overhead and profit. 3) All costs shown are 2004/05 costs. 4) Public Art to be determined per phase in conjunction with Council and Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission. 5) In Providing the Estimate, the Client understands that the Landscape Architect has no control over costs or the price of labor equipment or materials, or over the Contractor's method of pricing, and that the budget analysis provided herein are to be made on the basis of the Landscape Architect's qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs. 3 Fallon Sports Park Item Qty Unit Future Phase - Upper Terrace Cost Total' Upper Terrace Phase - Park Construction (14.41 acres) 1 Little League Field (2) Backstop 2 EA $50,000.00 $100.000 Grading 91,000 EA $1.00 $91,000 Infield Mix & Warning Track 26,000 EA $Z.00 $52,000 Lawn &Irrigation 65,000 EA $2.00 $130,000 Score Keeper's Booth 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000 - Scoreboard 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000 Dugouts 4 EA $10,000.00 $40,000 Bullpens 4 EA $10,000.00 $40,000 Foul poles 4 EA $3,000.00 $12,000 Bleachers 4 EA $4,000.00 $16,000 Trench Drain 350 LF $50.00 $17,500 Perimeter Fencing & Mowband 1,300 LF $40.00 $52,000 Subsurface Drainage 2,200 LF $30.00 $66,000 2. Softball (2) Backstop 2 EA $50,000.00 $100,000 Grading 174,000 EA $1.00 $174,000 Infield Mix & Warning Track 46,000 EA $2.00 $92,000 Lawn & Irrigation 128,000 EA $2.00 $256,000 Score Keeper's Booth 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,f100 Scoreboard 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000 Dugouts 4 EA $10,000.00 $40,000 - Bullpens 4 EA $10,000.00 $40,000 Foul poles 4 EA $3,000.00 $12,000 Bleachers 4 EA $4,000.00 $16,000 Trench Drain 350 LF $50.00 $17,500 Perimeter Fencing & Mowband 2,000 LF $40.00 $80,000 Subsurface Drainage 2,200 LF $30.00 $66,000 3. BMX Course (62,858 SF) 1 LS $200,000.00 $200,000 F Earthwork Starting Pavilion Bleachers Conc Paving Drainage Fencing Soil Amendments 4. Upper Adventure Playground (2,260 SF) 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000 5. Restroom Structure (2 Fixtures) -Prefabricated 1 EA $100,000.00 $100,000 - 6. Shade Structure 1 EA $25,000.00 S25,000 7. Seatwalls 38 CY $1,000.00 $38,000 8. Conc Curb 205 LF $20.00 $4,100 9. Conc Paving (Special Paving Optional) 16,460 SF $6.50 $106,990 10. Conc Paving 87,336 SF $5.50 $480,348 11_ Conc Steps & Handrails 1,626 SF $75.00 $121,950 12. Conc Paving for paths due to slopes 7,000 SF $6.50 $45,500 13_ Trellis --Picnic Play Area 1,275 SF $100.00 $127,500 14. Tree Wells 30 EA $200.00 $6,000 15. BBQ Grills --Large 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500 16. BBQ Grills ---Small 3 EA $300.00 $900 17. Picnic Table --Rectangular (Upper Terrace) 4 EA $2,500.00 $10,000 1 Fallon Sports Park Future Phase - Upper Terrace Item 18. Picnic Table ---Square (Upper Terrace) 19. bench 20. Bike Rack 21. Storage Container 22. Drinking Fountain 23. Drain Inlet 24. Storm Drainage 25. Sanitary Sewer 26_ Underground Electrical Work 27. Pathway Lights 28. Potable Water System 29. Lawn (Excludes Sport Fields) 30. Irrigation Controllers 31. Irrigation 32. 24" Box tree 33. 15 Gallon tree (Slope Planting 34. SWPPP/Erosion Control 35. Maintenance (90 days) Upper Terrace Phase - Park Construction Costs Qty Unit Cost Total' 12 EA $1,500.00 $18,000 13 EA $1,500.00 $19,500 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500 2 EA $4,000.00 $8,000 3 EA S5,000.00 $15.000 12 EA $1,500.00 $18,000 1 LS $150,000.00 $150.000 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 1 LS $41,000.00 $41,000 1 LS $35,500.00 $35,500 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 275,039 SF $1.00 $275,039 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 275,039 SF $1.00 $275,039 315 EA $250.00 $78,750 300 EA 5100.00 $30,000 1 LS $7,000.00 $7,000 275,039 SF $0.15 $41,256 Subtotal $4,129,372 Bonding & Insurance (2%) $82,587 Mobilization & General Conditions (5%) $206,469 Contingency (10%) $412,937 Subtotal $4,831,365 Upper Terrace Phase Cost Per Acre $335,279 Upper Terrace Phase - Street Improvements (0.68 Acres) Construction 1. 24" Box tree 37 EA $250.00 $9,250 2. Concrete Paving 11,736 SF $5.50 $64,548 3. Lawn 16,960 SF $1.00 $16,960 4. Irrigation 16,960 SF $1.50 $25,440 5. Maintenance (90 days) 16,960 SF $0.15 $2,544 Subtotal $118,742 Bonding & Insurance (2%) $2,375 Mobilization & General Conditions (5%) $5,937 Contingency (10%) $11,874 D. Upper Terrace Fallon Rd. Street Improvement Construction Costs Subtotal $138,928 Upper Terrace Phase Park & Street Improvements Construction Costs Total S4,970,293 Upper Terrace Phase Park & Street improvements Costs Acre $329,377 Fallon Sports Park Future Phase - kipper Terrace Item Qty Unit Cost Total Upper Terrace Optional items Not included in Estimate 1. Par Course - Upper Terrace 1 EA $30, 000.00 $30, 000 2. Upper Water Feature 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 3. Add Special Conc Paving 16,460 SF $3.50 $57,610 4. Trellis —Picnic Play Area 3,825 SF $100,00 $382,500 5. BBQ Grills ---Large 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500 6. Concrete Fence along Fallon Road 1,467 LF $28.00 $41,076 7. Picnic Table ---Square (Upper Terrace) 12 EA $1,500.00 $18, 000 Subtotal 583,686 Bonding & insurance (2%) $11,674 Mobilization & General Conditions (5%) $29,164 Contingency (10%) $58,369 Total Upper Terrace Optional Items Not Included in Estimate $682,913 Notes: 1) This Estimate excludes utility provider connection fees, Construction Contingency, changes due to unforeseen conditions, work related to hazardous materials, Design Fees, Engineering, Inspection, Testing, and Etc. 2) Unit Costs for elements include a 17% mark up for general contractor overhead and profit. 3) All costs shown are 2004/05 costs. 4) Public Art to be determined per phase in conjunction with Council and Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission. 5) In Providing the Estimate, the Client understands that the Landscape Architect has no control over costs or the price of labor equipment or materials, or over the Contractor's method of pricing, and that the budget analysis provided herein are to be made on the basis of the Landscape Architect's qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs. Fallon Sports Park Future Phase • Lower Terrace Item Qty Unit Cost Total l Lower Terrace Phase - Park Construction Costs (-19.75 acres) -- 1, Future Study Area (1) Grading 94,082 EA $1.00 $94,082 Lawn & Irrigation 94,082 EA $2.00 $188,164 Drainage 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 Subsurface Drainage 2,200 LF $30.00 $66,000 2. Bocce Court 4 EA $20,000.00 $80,000 Bocce Court Lights 1 LS $28,000.00 $28,000 3. Volleyball Court 4 EA $35,000.00 $140,000 Sand Subdrainage Fine Grading Conc Border wl Resilient Paving Nets 4. Soccer Field (Natural Turf) (80,000 SF) 2 EA $350,000.00 $700,000 Lawn & Irrigation Sand Drainage Goals 6. Cricket Overlay 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000 7. Lower Adventure Playground (11,175 SF) 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 8. Restroom Structure (2 Fixtures) -Prefabricated 2 EA $100,000,00 $200,000 9. Shade Structure 1 EA $25,000.00 $25,000 10. Seatwalls 77 CY $1,000.00 $77,000 11. Conc Curb at Parking Lot 3,423 LF $20.00 $68,460 12. Parking Lot (200 cars) 67,941 SF $4.50 $305,735 Striping & Signage Wheel Stops Accessible Parking Grading 13. Conc Paving (Special Conc Paving Optional) 24,690 SF $6.50 $160,485 14. Conc Paving 138,930 SF $5.50 $764,115 15. Conc Steps & Handrails 510 SF $75.00 $38,250 16. Conc Paving for paths due to slopes 5,000 SF $6.50 $32,500 17. Lower Entry Drive - Asphalt Paving (Special Conc Paving Optional) 6,808 SF $4.50 $30,636 Concrete Paving 4,812 SF $6.50 $31,278 18. Lower Terrace Entry Feature 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000 19. Signage / IdentityFeature 2 EA $50,000.00 $100,000 - 21. Trellis -Lower Entry Plaza 1,275 SF $100.00 $127,500 22. Tree Wells 79 EA $200.00 $15,800 23. BBQ Grills ---Large 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500 24. BBQ Grills ---Small 3 EA $300.00 $900 25. Picnic Table ---Rectangular (Lower Terrace) 4 EA $2,500.00 $10,000 26. Picnic Table ---Square (Lower Terrace) 20 EA $1,500.00 $30,000 27. Bench 38 EA $1,500.00 $57,000 - 28, Bike Rack 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500 29. Drinking Fountain 3 EA $5,000.00 $15,000 30. Fire Hydrant 1 EA $10,000.00 $10,000 _ 31. Drain Inlet 12 EA $1,500.00 $18,000 32. Storm Drainage 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000 33. Sanitary Sewer 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 34. Storage Container 5 EA $4,000.00 $20,000 - 35. Bioswale 660 LF $40.00 $26,400 36. Underground Electrical Work 1 LS $41,000.00 $41,000 37_ Pathway Lights 1 LS $35,500.00 $35,500 38. Parking Area Lights 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000 - 39. Potable Water Service (1 Connection) 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000 40. Potable Water System 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000 Fallon Sports Park Future Phase - Lower Terrace item 41. Fire Service (1 Connection) 42. Recycled Water Service (1 Connection) 43. Lawn (Excludes Sport Fields) 44. Irrigation Controllers 45. Irrigation 46. 24" Box tree 47. 15 Gallon tree (Slope Planting) 48. SWPPP/Erosion Control 49. Maintenance (90 days) Lower Terrace Phase - Park Construction Costs. Qty Unit Cost 1 LS $15,000.00 1 LS $20,000.00 220,229 SF $1.00 1 LS $50,000.00 220,229 SF $1.00 645 EA $250.00 300 EA $100.00 1 LS $10,000.00 220,229 SF $0.15 Subtotal Bonding & Insurance (2%) Mobilization & General Conditions (5%) Contingency (10%) Subtotal Lower Terrace Phase Cost Per Acre Total $15,000 $20,000 $220,229 $50,000 $220,229 $161,250 $30,000 $10,000 $33,034 $4,817,547 $96,351 $240,877 $481,755 $5,636,530 $285,394 Lower Terrace Phase - Street Improvements Fallon & Central (-.1.18 Acres) Construction 1. 24" Box tree 115 EA $250.00 $28,750 - 2. Concrete Paving 17,152 SF $5.50 $94,336 3. Lawn 33,160 SF $1.00 $33,160 4. Irrigation 33,160 SF $1.50 $49,740 5. SWPPPIErosion Control 1 LS $7,500.00 $7,500 - 6, Maintenance (90 days) 33,160 SF $0.15 $4,974 Subtotal $218,460 Bonding & Insurance (2%) $4,369 Mobilization & General Conditions (5%) $10,923 Contingency (10%) $21,846 Lower Terrace Phase - Street Improvements Fallon & Central Subtotal $255,598 - Lower Terrace Phase - Park & Street Improvements Construction Costs TOTAL $5,892,123 Lower Terrace Park & Street Improvements Construction Costs !Acre 281,516 2 Fallon Sports Park Future Phase - Lower Terrace Item Qty Unit Cost Total Lower Terrace Optional Items Not Included in Estimate 1. Add Bocce 2 EA $20, 000.00 $40, 000 — 2. Par Course - Lower Terrace 1 EA $30,000.00 $30,000 3. Add Special Conc Paving 24,690 SF $3.50 $86, 415 4. Lower Water Feature 1 LS $100, 000, 00 $100, 000 5. Lower Entry Drive Special Conc Paving 6,808 SF $3.50 $23,828 6_ Trellis —Lower Entry Plaza 3,000 SF $100.00 $300, 000 7. Trellis-- Volleybafi Area 3,300 SF $100.00 $330,000 g 8. Trellis --Natural Soccer Field Area 5,200 SF $100.00 $520, 000 9. Trellis —Bocce Area 2,100 SF $100.00 $2 1O, 000 10. BBO Grills ---Large 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500 11. Picnic Table ---Rectangular (Lower Terrace) 8 EA $2, 500.00 $20,000 — 12. Picnic Table ---Square (Lower Terrace) 32 EA $1,500.00 $48,000 13. Concrete Fence at Fallon Road 933 LF $28.00 $26,124 14. Concrete Fence at Central Parkway 1,300 LF $28.00 $36,400 Subtotal $1,775,267 — Bonding & insurance (2/) $35,505 Mobilization & General Conditions (5%) $88,763 Contingency (10%) $177, 527 Total Optional Items Not included in Estimate $2,077,062 Notes: 1) This Estimate excludes utility provider connection fees, Construction Contingency, changes due to unforeseen conditions, work related to hazardous materials, Design Fees, Engineering, Inspection, Testing, and Etc. 2) Unit Costs for elements include a 17% mark up for general contractor overhead and profit. 3) All costs shown are 2004/05 costs. 4) Public Art to be determined per phase in conjunction with Council and Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission. 5) In Providing the Estimate, the Client understands that the Landscape Architect has no control over costs or the price of labor equipment or materials, or over the Contractor's method of pricing, and that the budget analysis provided herein are to be made on the basis of the Landscape Architect's qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy qualifications and experience. The Landscape Architect makes no warranty, expressed or implied as to the accuracy of such opinions as compared to bid or actual costs. MEW 3 10-Year Cost comparison between a NATURAL GRASS field and a SYNTHETIC TURF field. Natural Grass (sand drainage) initial Capital Cost Excavate existing site, install drainage & irrigation systems, install & grow grass (seed/sod) Provide equipment to maintain grass Contactor to maintain field during growing SUBTOTALS Future Capital Costs Field replacement of irrigation & turf, etc. (10 years) Periodic equipment replacement SUBTOTALS 10 yr. Annualized Operation Cost Water and PG & E (Approxiamtely $3,2001acralyear) Labor to apply materials, mowing, aerating, divot replacement, area sod replacement (Approxiamtely S11,000lacrelyear) SUBTOTALS TOTALS' Exam.le of casts for 10 years with an 80,000 square toot field Syntetic Turf Initial Capital Cost Local Area Cost $320,000I $ 30,000 1 $20,0001 $370,000I S240,0001 I $20,000I 5260,0001 1 $64,0001 $220,0001 1 $284,0001 1 $914,000I Excavarian, drainage, Installation of Field Turf (2-112" Pro Series) Operating equipment required --roller brush, sweeper and cart SUBTOTALS Future Capital Costs Field replacement is done determining the useful service life interval (10 years) Operating maintenance equipment replacement SUBTOTALS 10 yr Annualized Operation Cost Water and PG & E Labor to sweep field (Approxiamtely $5,000/year or 5100 per week) SUBTOTALS TOTALS' 'These totals do not reflect any income garnered from field rental fees, nor the income lost in rental fees when natural grass fields are dosed due to inclement weather, maintenance or time down for repairs; such revenue losses do not occur with a FieldTurf field. Local Area Cost $750.000I I s10,0001 I ST60,0001 $400,0001 $5,0001 I S405,000I 54,0001 { $50.0001 S54,000I 51,219,0001 10-Year Cost comparison between a NATURAL GRASS field and a SYNTHETIC TURF field Both Fields have sports lighting and are available till 10:00 pm each day Natural grass fields are closed in the winter due to rain !Type of Event Natural Grassi I Synthetic Turf 84 weekend days x 10 hours per day 800 100 weekend days x 10 hours per day 1000 120 Spring & Fall weekdays x 6 hours Per day 720 120 Spring & Fall weekdays x fi hours per day 720 60 Summer weekdays x 10 hours per day 600 60 Summer weekdays x 10 hours per day 600 60 Winter weekdays x 6 hours per day 360 TOTALS Athletic Surface Costs Over 10-Year Periot 10 u88y Annually J Annually 2°1a0D1 26800] Over 10 Years Over 10 Years Expense Natural Grass Synthetic Turf' Installation Costs $370,000 $760,000 Replacement Cost $260,000 $406,000 Maintenance $284,000 $54.000 Total Cost Over 10 Years $914,000 S1,219,006 Hours Supportec 21,200 26,800 — Cost Per Hour $43 $45 Revenue Data: City of Roseville $135 for 1-112 hours, $325 for 4 hours, $750 for full day (up to 10 hours). Use of lights is an additional charge of $15 per hour, min 1-1/2 hours. City of Petaluma The City of Petaluma has told us that their field is rented 360 out of 365 days per year. Their rental rate Is $75/haur without lights and $95/hour with lights for "out of towners," $45/hour without lights and $65/hour with lights to "in-towners" and the local Petaluma soccer club, which may be the majority of their use. City of Folsom The City of Folsom rents their Feld as well, and it is constantly in use, with rates of $601hour without lights and $75/hour with lights for "out of towners," $48/hour without lights and $80/hour with lights to in-towners." Marin Academy The Marin Academy rents out their field to youth groups and the last rental rate i heard was $100/hour per third of the field, adding up to $3001per hour_ And I understand they have had waiting lists to rent field time in the winter. Fallon Sports Park Electrical Work City of Dublin Description Electrical Service and Equipment: Est. Ginty f Unit Unit Cost 4130 Volt Electrical Service Enclosure and Controls Transformer pad_ _- Switchboard pad Total Cost 1 !Is 34400.00 34000.00 Access control system and enclosure Site telephone service Scoreboard connections and grounding Scorekeepers booths - light, switch and receptacle Underground Electrical Work: 2000.00 2000.00 2500.00 2500.00 1 ea 8000.00 6000.00 1 Is 3000.00 3000.00 1:ea 11,ea 1 Is 14000.00 14000.00 5 ea 800.00 - 4000.00 Underground trenching, backfill and compaction Concrete sports field pull boxes and ground rods Concrete pull boxes and ground rods Waterproof receptacles outlets Irrigation controller connections Irrigation booster pump connections Conduit: 2'" PVC sch 40 3" PVC schd 40 4" PVC schd 40 5" PVC schd 40 75001 If 5.00 37500.00 42 ea 40 ea 16 ea 1 Is 1 is 500.00 21000.00 300.00 12000.00! 500.001 8000.001 1000.001000.00! 9000.00 9000.001 PVC elbows large radius Special conduit elbows at sports tight poles Conductors: No.12 AWG CU THWN No.8 AWG CU THWN 14000 If No. 6 AWG CU THWN No.4 AWG CU THWN No. 4I0 AWG CU THWN Wire terminations, splicing and tapping_ Grounding conductors, fittings and connections 160 280 30 0 If 0 If 0 If 1 Is 60 ea 3.00T 5.00! 6.001 15.001 1000.00 400.00 $67,500 42000.00 8000.00 16800.00 4500.00 1000.00 24000.00 12 CLF 56.00 672.00 135 CLF 85.00 11475.00 300 CLF 103.00 30900.00 300; CLF 112.00 33600.00 50,CLF 150.00, 7500.00 1 Is 6000.001 6000.00 1,Is ' 7000.00 7000,00, $281,947 Note: underground conduit, pull boxes, and wiring to light poles is covered idlndergraund Electrical Wort/ Little League Softball Light Poles: 50/30 fc illumination (pin wheel design, dual use pole with lights banked on both sides of pole to light two adjacent fields) Pole Tie Al 8 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete Pale Type B/ 16 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete Security lights on poles -_ Nighttime tests and re -aiming of ballfield lights 41ea 4 ea a ea 11Is 1 _ Softball Light Poles: 50130 illumination into wheel design. dual use pale with lights banked on both sides of pole 21000.001_ 84000.00 28000.00 112000.00 900.00 7200.00. 2000.00 2000.00 a light two adjacent fields) Pole Type Al 8 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 4 ea 21000.00 84000.00 Pole Type 61 16 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 4 ea 28000.00 112000.00 Pole pe C1 12 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 8 ea 24000.00 192000.001 Security lights on poles 8Iea 1 900.00 7200.00] Nighttime tests and re -aiming of ballfield lights 11ls 2040.00 2000.001 8397,200 I Baseball Light Poles: 50/30 fc illumination 1 ea t 13000.00 Pole Type Al 4 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete _ 2' 26000.0a Pole Type B18 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 10 2 ea ea 19000.00 r 220000 Q 190000.001 Pole Type C/ 9 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 44000.001 Nighttime tests and re -aiming of ballfleld lights 1 is 2000.00 2000.001 1 $262,000 Soccer Field Light Poles: 30 fc illumination I Pole Type S11 10 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 4 ea 23000.001 92000.001_ Pole Type S2/ 20 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 2 ea 31000.001 62000.001 Dnin Tuna RI/ 19 hiiminnire5 oozes and bases/concrete 4 ea i 24000.001 96000.00: Pole Type S4/ 24 luminaires, poles and baseslconcrete 2Jea j 36000.00 72000.00 Security lights on poles 12, ea 1 1 i Is 700.00 8400.00 2000.00 $332,400 Nighttime tests and re -aiming of ballfield lights 2000.00j Pathway Lights 20' pole, luminaire and footing - 1 34 ea 3000,00 102000.00 Parkhng_Area Lights _ 25' pole, single luminaire and footing 14 12 ea ea 3400.00 47600.00 3900.00 46800,00 25' pole, twin luminaire and footing ea Tennis Court Light Poles: 50' pole height - 50 fc illumination 4 a 13000.00 Pole Type T1/ 4 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 52000.00 Pale Type T2/ 8 luminaires, poles and baseslconcrete 2 ea 17000.00 34000.00 28000.00 $86,000 Basketball Court Light Poles: 30' pole height - 20 fc illumination Pole Type B112 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 4:ea 7000.00, Pole Type B21 4 luminaires, poles and bases/concrete 2!ea 9000.00: 18000.00t i $46,000 Bocce Court Light Poles: 30' pole height - 20 fc illumination Pole Type B1f 2 luminaires, poles and baseslconcrete 4 ea 7000.00 28000,00 Volleyball Court Light Poles: 30' pole height - 20 fc illumination Pole Type V112 luminaires, poles and baseslconcrete 4 ea 7000.001 28000.00 CancessloniRestroom Building 16 8 ea ea Interior lights 300.00 4800.00 - Exterior lights 400.00 3200.00 Receptacles 14 ea 150.00 2100.00 _-- Switches 7 ea 140.00 980.00 25 kva transformer 480v-2401120v 1 ea 3000.00 3000.00 Telephone Service, conduit, box, terminal board & outlet 1 ea 3000.00 3000.00 Panelboard 1:ea 2000.00 2000.00 A/C unit connection Ilea ' 1000.00 1000.00 Water heater, hand dryer connections 5 ea 500.00 2500.00 _ $22, 580__ Restroom Buildinrc-small, prefabricated Panel feeders, connections and grounding 4 ea 1500.00r 6000.00: Total subcontractor cost 1953227 00' rti/ ; 32F A L L N SPO sE IPA {PdAN PARK IDENTITY' FEATURE S. NETCHBORHOOD CONNECTION PARK IDENTITY - FEATURE 6 NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION LITTLE LEAGUE . LITTLE LEAGUE LIGHTED TURF NIC THTSOCCER 1, LE LEAGUE CENTER S. PICNIC PLAZA LITTLE LEAGUE NKIIN . 1.25.9)4 LIGHTED R (SYNTHETIC TURF OPTION) SOCCER SOCCER VOLLEYBALL ICNIC PLQZAy CRICKET OVERLAY :DE5TR IAN ENTR$ NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION FIRE STATIO ADVENTURE PLAY AREA S. PICNIC PLAZA 1 UUPEOPLE) FEATURE SOFTBALL (LIGHTED]. ART OPPORTUNITY FUTURE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREA BMX CENTER MASTER PLAN SOFTBALL WARM-µP ARE SOFTBALL )LIGHTED) EVERGREEN SCREEN ACCENT TREES PICNIC PLAZA FUTURE STUDY AREA "OVERLOOK NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION —•— IDENTITY A �•- ' NEIGHBORHOOD FALLON01- SPORTS PARK D ti iN 4jHBB EMS" nentary 01. Oa Oa is RIGHTED', (SYNTHETIC YARDS 'TF, LIGHTED SOCCER OW,'v YAR71 AND 65 „BYAR NATURAL SOCCER FIELD TE,NNIS CENTERIRESTRQOM THEnCTI:Fr yx TED SOCCER SOFTBALL (LIGHTED, BA 1 REVISED MASTER PLAN/LOWER TERRACE SOFTBALL (LIGHTED, sss BEACH STREET ITHk7 MT �o x ,z„n, On E,GH¢ORHOO CO 0%BBYARDS SOCCER r11. r 44 - J �. � � � •b a .�� N.= �851' TEnt>o,Mrtv 50%80 YARDS SOCCER BASIN/ WARM UP ARE (122 LOWER TERRAC- • ENTRY ROAD AND PARKING (165 CAS( — - • PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION • UTILITIES OPTIONAL PARK AMENITIES • LANDSCAPING (EROSION CONTROL) • 2 SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FIELDS (2(65 X110) OR 2 • 2 NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELDS (80 X120 AND 65%110) SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FIELDS (802120 AND 65 %1 10) • LIGHTED 90' BASEBALL DIAMOND (NATURAL GRASS ONLY) ,. BASEBALL FIELD REST ROOM • ADVENTURE PLAYGROUND N BUILDING • BASEBALL SYNTHETIC TURF INFIELD • ADVENTURE PLAYGROUND BASEBALL FIELD TERRACED SEATING • RECREATION BUILDING • SCORE KEEPER'S BOOTH SOCCER FIELD LIGHTING BASEBALL SCOREBOARD • SOCCER FIELD SHADE STRUCTURES • SOCCER FIELD WIND BREAKS BOCCE COURT • SOCCER PRACTICE WALLS BOCCE COURT LIGHTS GROUP PICNIC (100 PEOPLE) PARK IDENTITY AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNS SITE FURNISHINGS STAIRS A SLOPED P nentary NNO 1 1, EiERRAtE Ear I (LIGHTED', (SYNT'H'ETIC TURFLIGHTED 1 -- BO X 1E0 YARIT1 AND „0YARD NATURAL SOCCER FIELD 50X80 YARDS SOCCER BASIN/ u> AREA fa22 SOCCER 'PRACTICE WALL SOFTBALL(LIGHTED, aSOFTBALL I l 1ST PHASE OPTIONS LOWER TERRACE BBB BEACH STREET /Try ,2,,>, o,° .F° TUINIS ENTER RF, ..- UPPER TERRA (SYNT'H'ETIC TURFLIGHTED SOCCER FUTURE OPEN SPACE SOFTBALL (LIGHTED, POP CITY OF A Y"▪ a NEIMTOA. BALL DIAMON.0'- NEIGHBORHOOD CO NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION CZ 0 1ST PHASE LOWER TERRACE • ENTRY ROAD AND PARKING (145 CARS) • PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION • UTILITIES • LANDSCAPING (EROSION CONTROL) • 2 NATURAL TURF SOCCER FIELDS (80 X120 AND 65X1110) • 90 BASEBALL DIAMOND (NATURAL GRASS ONLY) • RESTROOM/CONCESSION BUILDING • MINIMAL SITE FURNISHINGS o so ioo so �� 23.11.1.11_,f V) .4- Z 0 0 — CV V) • — CO Ce CV 112..---ob ate Fallon Sports Park Mitigated Negative Declaration / Initial Study File No.: PA 05-021 Lead Agency: City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 April 26, 2005 ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 94568 ECLARATION April 26, 2005 Website: httP://www,oi.dublin.oa.us (Prepared pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines) Mitigated Negative Declaration For: PA 05-021 Fallon Sports Park Master Plan — Park Development Plan Description of Project: The project consists of the construction of recreational features and facilities on the Fallon Sports Park property located In the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. The park development encompasses approximately 60 acres of property, and improvements to the land consist of baseball, softball and soccer fields; tennis and bocce courts; group picnic areas and play areas, pathways, and associated parking lots to serve the park. The park development will serve as a major sports field recreational facility for the City and is consistent with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan adopted by the City in 2004, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan EIR, and the City of Dublin General Plan. Project Location: Generally located southwest of the Intersection of Fallon Road and Gleason Drive Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area Name of Proponents: City of Dublin Parks & Community Services 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Public Hearings: A public hearing will be held before the City Council on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Project on Tuesday, May 17, 20D5, at 7:00 P.M. in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin. I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the mitigation measures incorporated in the project. A copy of the Initial Study (Environmental Information Form" and "Environmental Checklist Form7) documenting the reasons to support the above finding is available for review at the Cfty of Dublin Community Development Department, Planning Division, at 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin. Dated: April 26, 2005 Harbin, Senior Planner Date Published: April 27, 2005 Date Posted; April 27, 2005 Date Notice Mailed: April 26, 2005 Considered by: City Council on: Action on Mitigated Negative Declaration: Approved Disapproved Notice of Determination flied: Resolution No. Area Code (926) - City tvlanagZi'5Ttjty Council 833-664Aaa,RIMM• e-gRigomic Development 83303650 Finance 833-6640 • Public Works/Engineering 833-6830 - Parks & Community Services 803-6645 -Pr1ke 833-6670 Planning/Code Enforcement 833-6610 • Building Inspection 833-6620 • Fire Prevention Bureau 833-6606 Printed on Recycled Paper TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Project Description and Context 4 Exhibits 8 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 14 Determination 14 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 15 Attachment to Initial Study 26 Discussion of Checklist 26 L Aesthetics 26 H. Agricultural Resources 27 III. Air Quality 28 IV. Biological Resources 33 V. Cultural Resources 34 VI. Geology and Sails 34 VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 36 VIII. Hydrology and Water 37 IX. Land Use Planning 38 X. Mineral Resources 39 Xl. Noise 39 XII. Population and Housing 40 XIII. Public Services 41 XIV. Recreation 41 XV. Transportation/Traffic 41 XVI. Utilities and Service Systems 43 XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance 44 Background Information 45 References 45 City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 2 April 26, 2005 INTRODUCTION This Initial Study and associated Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California. Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the 2005 CEQA Guidelines adopted by the City of Dublin. The Initial Study assesses the potential environmental impacts of implementing the proposed project described below. The Initial Study consists of a completed environmental checklist, and a brief explanation of the environmental topics addressed in the checklist. 1. Project. Title: City of Dublin Fallon Sports Park, PA 05-021 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: City of Dublin Community Development 101 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Janet Harbin, Senior Planner Community Development Department (925) 833-6610 4. Project Location: Southwest of the intersection of Gleason Drive/Fallon Road APN: 985-0027-008 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Dublin Parks & Community Services Dept. 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Contact Person: Herma Lichtenstein, Parks and Facilities Development Manager 6. G-eneral/Specific Plan Designation: Parks/Public Recreation, Open Space (Stream Corridor) & City Park 7. Zoning: 8. Public agency required approvals: City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 pp Connnunity Park Building and Grading Permits (City of Dublin) Utility, Sewer and Water Service Permits (DSRSD) Encroachment Permits (City of Dublin) Page 3 April 26, 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CONTEXT The development of Fallon Sports Park and conceptual plan for the Park was approved by the Dublin City Council, with funding provided through the Capital Improvement Program CIP Budget for fiscal year 2001 to 2002. The basis for creation of the Park was the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan updated in 2004, which also outlined the specific program elements to be included in Fallon Sports Park. As there was a need for a large competition ball field park to serve the growing community in the eastern portion of Dublin, and also the rest of the Dublin community, the Master Plan directed such facilities to be located on the subject 60-acre parcel (see Exhibit A). The City Council appointed a 22- member task force to study these program elements and design options beginning in March 2004. Working with City staff, a design consultant, Carducci & Associates, and other members of the community, various design options and associated park elements and features were refilled for the inclusion in the final Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, presented to the City Council in December 2004. The Master Plan for the Park includes such recreational facilities to serve the community as sports fields, play areas, plazas, restrooms and concession buildings, trails and associated parking areas, with linkages to large open space areas. It is anticipated that the Park will be built in three phases as shown in the diagram in Exhibit E. Location: Fallon Sports Park is located near major transportation corridors such as Fallon Road, Gleason Drive, Central Parkway and Lockhart Street within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment planning area of the City, ensuring convenient access for all members of the Dublin community (see Exhibit B). Its location in east Dublin is in an area experiencing a great deal of growth at this time based on the implementation of the Specific Plan adopted in 1994. The existing land use development pattern and projected land uses in the east will likely double the size and population of the City within the next 20 years. Recreational Features and Facilities: The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan directs the growth of infrastructure, community centers and parks such as the Fallon Sports Park and other park sites to meet the future demands of the Dublin community under the projected land uses in Specific Plan. The Specific Plan provided the necessary land use framework for development of the 60-acre park site by establishing the goals and priorities for development of parklands and recreational spaces in the eastern portion of the City, in a portion of an area known as Dublin Ranch, Area F. With consideration to the land use established by the Specific Plan for the property, and based on the various elements and features identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan with input from the Task Force and Parks and Community Services Commission meetings, the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan has been designed to include the following recreational features and facilities as shown in Exhibit C: Sport Facilities: a. 4-60' Little League Fields; City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 4 April 26, 2005 11 b. 4 Softball Fields (2 lighted); c. 4 Soccer Fields (2 lighted), 2 natural turf fields with cricket field overlay 2 natural turf fields with synthetic turf option; d, 1-90' Baseball Field (lighted); e. 4 Bocce Courts (lighted), 2 additional courts optional (lighted); f. 4 Basketball Courts (lighted); g. 4 Sand Volleyball Courts; and, h. BMX Course. Other Park Facilities: i. Activity Hubs j. Picnic Plazas and Family Picnic Areas (with barbeques); k. Play Areas; 1. On -Site Parking and street frontage improvements; rn. Loop Jogging Trail; n. Connecting Trails to adjacent open space; o. Art and Water Features (optional); p. Lockable Bicycle Parking throughout Park; q. Restrooms & Concessions; and, r. Shade Structures. OTHER RELATED ACTIONS The Fallon Sports Park is the eastern portion of Area F, in the original 186-acre Jordon property presently being developed for residential use. Grading activities have commenced on the future park site in conjunction with the development of Area F in Dublin Ranch in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, along with preliminary infrastructure improvements. These activities were analyzed and evaluated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (March 2000) adopted by the Dublin City Council for Area F (PA 98-068, Reso. No. 34-00), and also in the Addendum (PA 01-037) adopted by the City Council (Reso. No. 43-04) in March 2004 for the Area F North Project. Subsequently, a preliminary grading plan (see Exhibit D) for the park land area was prepared as part of the Area F overall grading plans. On the western edge of the park property, running parallel to Lockhart Street and its intersection with Gleason Drive, is a continuous 70-foot wide open channel stream corridor being erihanced for environmental mitigation purposes related to development of Area E. The park site topography consists of rolling hills and two small valleys, with, an overall 4% slope over the entire property. Construction of site improvements requires grading with related cut and fill to balance the soil on the property, thereby facilitating the improvements and recreational uses planned. Stormwater drainage on the site City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 5 April 26, 2005 will be provided through a series of swales and filtration methods, to eventually channel stormwater to connections with the existing on -site facilities. Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD), in accordance with DSRSD's Eastern Dublin Faeilities Master Plan, will provide water, sewer and recycled water services. Sewer service for the project will be accommodated through a connection to the existing sewer system owned and maintained by the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD). Recycled water from DSRSD will be used for irrigation purposes, reducing the need for potable water. Additionally, irrigation and drainage requirements are provided and planned for all on -site improvements. PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS Approval of the General Plan / Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments, Planned Development Rezoning / Development Plans, future Tentative Map and amendment to the Development Agreement for Area F of Dublin Ranch are within the Dublin General Plan's Eastern Extended Planning Area and the Pastern Dublin Specific. Plan Area, which was the subject of an Environmental Impact Report, certified by the City of Dublin in 1993 (Addenda to the EIR were also approved, dated May 4, 1993 and August 22, 1994). The General Plan/Specific Plan EIR is a program EIR, which anticipated several subsequent actions related to future development in Eastern Dublin. The FIR did identify some impacts from implementation of the General Plan/Specific Plan that were not able to be mitigated. Upon certification of the EIR, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for several irnpacts, some of which relate to this project. The City also adopted a mitigation -monitoring program, which included measures intended to reduce impacts from the development of Eastern Dublin area. These mitigation measures apply to project approvals and actions at various stages in the development process, and will be applied to this project as applicable. The timing of the mitigation measures was indicated in the City's OR mitigation monitoring matrix (City Council Resolution No.53-93) and was to he incorporated into the timing of the development of Area F. Through the Initial Study process discussed above, several issues presented themselves requiring additional analysis, and, ultimately, mitigation measures which resulted in an additional Mitigated Negative Declaration to be prepared for Area F. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was published for review on November 9, 1999, for the mandatory 30-day review period. Based on discussions with the project applicants, measures to mitigate loss of on -site breeding and movement (estivation) habitat for both species within Planning Area F, including the portion of the corridor on the Fallon Sport Park site, were refined and included in the original Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. Mitigation for the impacts consists of permanently creating suitable red -legged frog and California tiger salamander habitat and preserving a minimum 63-acre site in the northern drainage area of the Dublin Ranch property. Other mitigations have also been included. The amended mitigation measures reduced impacts to biological resources to a less -than -significant level (document is incorporated by reference). City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 6 April 26, 2005 The park site has been the subject of subsequent environmental reviews as applications for various phases of the Dublin Ranch development were submitted to and approved by the City. The park site was once included within Areas B and E of Dublin Ranch (known as the "Area F/B/E Project"), and the City approved a Negative Declaration for that project on November 18, 1997 through Resolution 140-97. The Negative Declaration evaluated an area of approximately 453 acres, consisting of Dublin Ranch Areas B through E, and proposed for a variety of residential and non-residential uses, as well as a community park site of approximately 42 acres, The portions of Areas B and E analyzed at that time included residential uses and the community park site configured to be approximately 65 acres. For the portions of the project within Area F, the City approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration on February 15, 2000 through Resolution 34-00. Following the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration in 2000, the City prepared an Initial Study dated February 9, 2004, for the Area F area to determine whether supplemental environmental impacts would occur as a result of this project beyond or different from those already addressed in the Program EIR and the previous Negative Declaration and Mitigated Negative Declaration, incorporated by refernece. The Initial Study reviewed the proposed reconfiguration of 'uses, including the use of 60 acres for a community park, and recent environmental studies prepared for the Area F project. These studies included a TJKM traffic report containing projected traffic volumes based on the various land uses proposed with the project. Since the prior reviews, the applicant also has obtained permits from state and federal agencies for alteration of wetlands and has implemented related offsite mitigation, as anticipated in the prior reviews and further described in the Initial Study for the project, and incorporated here by reference. The Initial Study determined that the Area F project would cause no environmental impacts beyond those previously identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR, the subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Negative Declaration based on the project description and the minor nature of the changes proposed by the project, evaluation of the prior reviews, and evaluation of recent reports. Under these circumstances, a CEQA Addendum was prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164, and adopted by the City Council on March 16, 2004. Additionally, the proposed Fallon Sports Park was included in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2004 Update (PA 04-035) and the acreage used in determining City community park acreage along with the type of facilities to be included in the park, for which the City Council adopted a Negative Declaration on March 16, 2O04 (Reso. No. 48-04). An Initial Study was prepared for the Master Plan 2004 Update in accordance with City environmental guidelines and CEQA Guidelines. The Initial Study concluded that implementation of the specific changes to park lands and open space in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan 2004 Update would not pose any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration was prepared. A copy of City Council Resolution No. 48-04 and associated information is included as incorporated in this document by reference. As the various sports fields, courts and other facilities pertinent to the development and successful future of the Master Plan for Fallon Sports Park were not analyzed in depth in previous environmental documents noted here, but only as a general land use category of community park, this Mitigated City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 7 April 26, 2005 Iz documents noted here, but only as a general land use category of community park., this Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study analyzes the development and design of the specific types of activity and passive areas to be developed within the boundaries of Fallon Sports ?ark, City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 8 April 26, 2005 ASSESSOR'S MAP 98 I5 R4 1 DESISNATEO REMAINDER AMA N4. 4 r(NQTAPARTI ( fe Ial,,4 AC.* 08845 AC, 2I Code Arco Nos, 26-024 26-•026 64-00,6 64-004 RANCHO SANTA IR TA (John Yaunlx} rAr.aK.•A-fra,le t T..2S...R.1E.iSEC..34 2E (A) TR. 5925 241.10 .r IIL.1-'•- 1 9 0 DU LlN „ SOSI. 4AR4 ffi P wf 28 0.5.57 AS.* x v'IY•if j{CI,A✓ r , I35.49 AC.* 155.04 AC.A Um 15,004 .TIt9a:ZE�.w•+..n.hv414 .-A1-A-a60 INTERSTATE 55'04 -6lJ [R 0405 946 1128 EX 904/1 IT A — Assessor Parcel Map City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 904/1 DETAIL -A- acALtl 1.•Rc4' 4r'- �ww INTERSTATE Page 9 April 26, 2005 905. 2 905 2 SEE I- • Y +( 580 E City of Dublii2 Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 IT B - Vicinity Map. EXHIBIT C - Fallon Sports Park Master Plan City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 11 April 26, 2005 ALLON SPORTS PARK Am:04.1c., 40W MA' ITIVAmm. EX c'e c'CO' tii.FavcocfAcc.' • k p GRADING PLAN t ( 411.11 carroir. 01145t1 &wow prrvLJ 99MSH e,ENTAPP,rrALJ ri4m4t trept PNTP4olck- wow B...seap.r puci.A1...ted.5,0c4 EMITAIN° !EMU AKCA LeleArOci IT D - Preliminary Grading Plan City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Ntgative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 D DO 1+0 Page 12 April 26, 2005 !“. T S,\=1"4•R/K7 : SING DIAGRAM . 1:144bw. .,i,' • • 1 '... '11.tii ikA. . "" , ' \ , • P1.. .4.V.F.f..',...,,P..'' . EFT .. I I .. • • ', . ..'.:.:P.,." ''' ,,,..,•;;;,0.:;• ', 1„. Oiiiii5W,O(OAr l'.", ,, ...PROVIOW90. ' .4.1411t5 ANo•UsEs ..,...,.., , ' .. ,H .,..:1,•Buuz ikRiTEp)4Erkp".dti'' ' ;.•riksTrci:INREAsE., • ':. . .• .. toAliii.dmitiesEQuekenpflAsE I" , ''' R000100'. .M PO ARY CT/4 Ac.0E DEYELOPMEM":;'6 of FAitroN i .• . k A..:i .- AN Cin-tflttii,,M CC6' R Ill ;6' 64 ,, „R.. V E L 0: p. Iiixs T..,FippgyEo.),..... ,,, t..;...„ tGLEAPI:w . H 6,RIVE....COM0 ...• .7•fir•'..•.,..::.!:.;:*.,:..;. B.TRBE=TGOMP.ITE 2005/20kr 0-4'.,'`i,'..j •:;7.,t':.:.*2.'„..:',:z..4,!., T1, snot coUBIO.OR: CONSTRUCT AI.ON.q1WITT;1 0C1.5,,,IRT,. ';'''.:';, ' 1E ..4..E liNcoiNpsrREAm,celmb..pk.o0LEM9..41?",* , Fo!...014•koAD..1.NORTHERN,HA,L..r.9.y.ROAD.74:1TICr..ANO ,i,'2.1'•:..:. UTHEBN NMI MASS gRApliztp;Tv.J.0•2 ..",r IDEti.,#i:?•,c9mri.sTe...fAlipt.i.i O.AD 2,0. (2.0 1.1., '',•.:..': MPIA1,1, 2004/2005 !'CENTIALPARPCWAY,,'COmPLETE-2ooh 2 ocr/1.4 If • ;,.....7.,v-,.' - .. '0,,,-V. .zi,::' ... ',.. ..: , ..:.,',. p.'5'i• . — '")''S I PE.4,iikR't..P ilt AttO 14 ' 'Pitl'itS'k ":!,-,7 mAs.s...q00,113. • . ,,....„...,...4:,:,.•,,r._•T, :,•3.:•• '•,:, •••••.•.,.......,, vEmicuUka'BRIC,tike- ' • ...i.V4': ,-.). !.''' .',,e.,..i:,..,;;Y!'6"..., TEAAPOR'ARY.WIRV4.'AI LilltkitrirACE '; '....1.:'A.,C;I:i::•,,,,,..,;(...H:I.,.: - siTE:AtoEsswi*.iftliP.Lo-trileD reks - .' ...',1!•;X:,,;',:17..,;';'.,'•• ..pEkikt-trER INFRAFTRUOTuRE!.44:, ..' . ''' • • , . '..,,•,.!::;4,!:!'.,'!'...','";'' . U11Lflrrwrva$2:','•••••,. • :. .r•;'''' ...i.' ' • '''';'7';';'*L'''•;%; T. ER oRION'CONTROL , i ,.. ri(:.• • BEEOING ,. • ,STORM DRAINAdi." ,•L':'. ,.. , • .. . .,.. , ,... . • PWkSE 1•••' .PEOESTRIAN,BZDOE ' • • • . TWOUTTLE LEAGUE FIRos,WETti AsS.00IATEO;PLAZA,..PcNIC, AND.P.E.STROOm/CONCES610N TWo.LIGHTED'tO.PTBALL FIELAR.WITp PICNIC, ANDRERTROOM/CONCREBION:j'•;:' POUR LIOKTED tENNas cougrs ;''"1 ftr1.1•11. UOFITED.BASKETRALL rout • TWO LIOKTBD NATURAL TUPlOCCER1 IELbE,W.ITI.•.STNTHETX niPF (OPTIONAL). ' ' ' ' . ART AN WATER PEATUREB'1... .U.PPER TERRACE PARRINO,LOT .1,0PpER 'TERRACE LOP WilkIN 0 litA4C. UPPER TERRAcE P.A.AK IDENTIFICATION ftAIWIE5 BAI,X COURSE . • .•.R.p00,141.iiRRAI:4NO INii3FiASE .1 :PE ll (ORDER OP Ei•VEI:o ,„. UPPBRI1_00 ".t. • TY 1, q:.„ • g I • kOURSE aORHOOD OE TEMPOR -4.4t ',.koWER TERRACE g PARKINO,AND AcTivir'r,E nwcLuDiN41, CNI1C PLAZA, • TWO/NATURAL TURP50..,CER FI ONE OWED BASEBALL MLR '44....P0,11PUGHTED BOCCE CoU.R1 : . ‘rruip ApoTTIONALLioNTEp.reo. SOUP SANDVOLLEY6AlitOORIV. '.:•••Aitti'ANO WATER FEATLIRES • ositippi8qmoop,col4wEcrtio • OKRIcIpENtriPicAlricaNTEATUR;d •coMPL PPER.ANo . ' EXHIBIT E - Fallon Sports Park Phasing Plan City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 13 April 26, 2005 1 2. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "potentially significant impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics - Agriculturai Resources - 1 Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Soils Hazards and Hazardous Hydrology/Water Quality - Land Use/ Planning Materials Mineral Resources Noise - Population/Housing Public Services - Recreation - Transportation/ Circulation Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY LEAD AGENCY): On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be plwared+ 1 find that although the proposed project could 411.110 environment there will not be a significant,e*Ptintlaw ease becauserefiosions in the woj yot have been made by or agreed tolpy:. the project proponent; A MJTJGATE» NEGATIVE DECL.ARA1ON will he prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed, I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the iroposed project, nothing further is required. Signature: Printere: Janet Harbin, Senior Planner City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Date: April 26, 2005 For: Citv of Dublin Page 14 April 26, 2005 i Environmental Impacts (Note: Source of determination listed in parenthesis. See listing ofsources used to determine each potential impact at the end of the checklist.) Note; A full discussion of each item is found following the checklist. I. Aesthetics. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a scenic vista? (Source: 1-8) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Source: 1 - 7) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings'? (Source: 1 - 7) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Source: 1-5,7) II. Agricultural Resourc . Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as showing on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to a non-agricultural use? (Source: 2-5,7,8) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Source: 6,7,8) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to a non -agricultural use? (Source., 2-5,7,8,11,12) M. Air Quality (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district may be relied on to make the following determinations). Would the project; a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Source: 4,5,7,11,12) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Source: 5,7 , 11 -13) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 poterujq0 MThgthithi X X X X X X Page 15 April 26, 2005 .. , Note: A fill discussion of each item is found following the :.:..Potentially.• .... .1.,ii-ii..." ......LeSktliatit:••• .. Ni)'. impaet • • •. checklist. .:',gnzi7c(int::';7:. !::.08.111ficri:11.(.;•.,;..:.,;:.$.4g7T.I.P.acirir:: -...,::........:"....H:H•:::::,-...•:.: .• : 'ir:itii0.••:••:j ...•.:'.,;.Iiiith;,';]!.i.:H.. ...H•iiiiiiit''H: '.: '''.';:•L'..'':':....'',..!..'''H' ' ...... ... ..,..... .. ...........„, .,. , .... ... . ... 4grei.4014.:.:.........:.'..,.. :,..,..•.":, ,: , .:,•.,....7.!:',:.,;!,:':-, c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? (Source: 5,7 ,11-13) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Source: 5,7 ,11-13) c) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Source: 1,3,5-7,11-13) rv. Biological Resources. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the (J.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Source: 1-3,5,7,9,11-13,15-20) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Source: 1-3,5,7,9,11-13,15-20) c) Have a substantial adverse impact on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direr t removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other means? (Source: 1-3,5,7,9,11-13,15-20) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Source: 3,5,7,9,11 -13,15 - 20) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree protection ordinances? (Source: 3,5,7,9, 11 -13 ,15- 20 ) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 X X X X X Page 16 April 26, 2005 X Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the checklist. f) Conflict with the provision of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? (Source! 3-5, 7,9,11-13) V. Cultural Resources. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse impact in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Sec. 15064.5? (Source: 1,2,4,5,9,11-14) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to Sec. 15064.5 (Source: 1,2,4,5,9,11-14) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature? (Source: 1,2,4,5,9,11-14) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of a formal cemetery? (Source: 1,2, 4,5,9,11-14) VI. Geology and Soils. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist or based on other known evidence of a known fault (Source: 1-9,11- 13) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking (Source: 1-9,11-13) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (Source: 1-9,11-13) iv) Landslides? (Source: 1-9,11-13) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Source: 1-9,11-13) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become nnctable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- and off - site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or similar hazards (Source: 1-9,11-13) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Les.S4hanL lmpacr : . difttzganon: I VI Less -than- o impact Ei signajzcant lmpact Page 17 April 26, 2005 Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the checklist. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table .13-1-T3 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial rislcs to life or property? (Source: 1-9,11-13) e) Have soils capable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste? (Source:1-3,6-9,11,12,13) VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? (Source:1-3,6, 7,10) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous into the environment? (Source: 1-3,6,7, 10-13) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Sourc e: 1- 3,6,7,10-13) d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65962.5 arid, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Source: 1-7,10-13) e) For a project located within an airport land usc plan or, where such plan has not been adopted, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Source: I - 7,10-23) f) For a project within the vicinity of private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Source: 1,2,4,6,7,11-13) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with the adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Source: 1,2,6,7,10-13) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 „ • Pozen tial‘Y. 4,f;f4w7111(;:iit-:: Lqss:4iv4r4HE:::•.N=?:imPacT • : ; : : : • :: X X X X X X Page 18 April 26, 2005 X X Note: A fill discussion of each item is found following the checklist. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildiands? (Source: 1-7,11-13) VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality . Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Source:1 -7,11-13,18, 19) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g. the production rate of existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (Source: 1 -7,11-13, 18) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the aeration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off -site? (Source: 1-7,11-13, 18) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas, including through the alteration of a course or stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (Source: 1-7,11-13, 18,20) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Source: 1- 7,11-13, 18) f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Source: 1-7,11-13,18,19) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? (Source: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,11-13) h) Place within a 100-year fhood hazard area structures which impede or redirect, flood flows? (Source: 1- 7,11-13, 18) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 1 31 • Patentictii N9:61:0Pet J.:Impact Impact : : X X Page 19 April 26, 2005 X Note: A full discussion of each item is pund following the checklist. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, and death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (Source: 1-7,11-13,18) j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? (Source: I-7,9,11-13,18) IX. Land Use and Pla.nning. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Source: 1-7,11-13) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect'? (Source: 1-8,11-13,16-20) e) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (Source: 1-8,11-13) X. Mineral Resources. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Source: 1,2,6,7,11-13) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general Plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Source: 1,2,6,7,11-13) XL Noise. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Source: 1-8,11 -13) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Sonrce: 1 -8,11-13) c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above existing levels without the project? (Source: 1-8,11-13) d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels without the project? (Source: 1-8, 11-13) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 o., ay With Iinpac/ Aro' 4 4,411•1.,L X X X X Page 20 April 26, 2005 Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the checklist, e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working n the project area to excessive noise levels? (Source: 1-8,11-13) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Source; 1-8,11.13) X11. Population and Housing. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Source: 1-4,7,8,10) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Source:1-4,7,8,10) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the replacement of housing elsewhere? (Source: 1- 4,7,8,10) XIII. Public Services. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (Sources: 1,3,5 ,7, 11-13) Police protection? (Sources: 1,3,5 ,7, 11-13) Schools? (Sources: 1,3,5,7,11-13) Parks? (Sources: 1,3,5,7,11-13) Other public facilities? (Sources: 1-5,7,11- 13,18,21) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 1 t3 •../:\ro? impact stgniflcaii X X X X X Page 21 April 26, 2005 X X X X 134 Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the ; No impact checklist. Impac, !wItn;lmpact H,;;;• • : !:: • : XIV. Recreation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated (Sources: 1,3-5,7,11- 13) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Sources: 1,2,4,5,7,11-13) XV. Transportation and Traffic. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase X in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads or congestion at intersections)? (Sources: 1,3A 7, 1 1-13,21) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the County X Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways? (Sources: 1,3,4,6,7,11-13,21) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in X location that results in substantial safety risks? (Sources: 1,3,4,6,7,11-13,21) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses, such as farm equipment? (Sources: 1,2,4,7-10) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Sources: 1-4,7-11) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X (Sources: 1-5,8) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (such as bus X turnouts and bicycle facilities)? (Sources: 1,3-8,21) X X XVI. Utilities and Service Systems. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (Sources: 1,4-6,9,11-13,19) City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 1011.1011011 nosoomem, x Page 22 April 26, 2005 Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the checklist. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1,2-7,11-13,18-20) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1-7,11- 13,18-20) d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing water entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (Sources: I -7,11-13,18-20) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (Sources: 1-7.11-13,18-20) 0 Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (Sources: 1-7,11-13,18-20) g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (Sources: 1-7,11- 13,18-20) XVI. Mandatary Findings af Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable • when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects arid the effects of probable future projects). City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Potentially:: Impact ! ' • Les412n- , .Les,V-thgn- ' sgnifica,rit 37gmficant .:!Wu Impact Mitigation ;,:i Page 23 April 26, 2005 irnpact X X X X X X X Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the •;Patentially:L! ..F411.0cant • checklist. c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectiy7 City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 24 April 26, 2005 1 31 Sources used to determine potential environmental impacts: 1. Project location & Preliminary Grading Plan prepared by MacKay & Somps, March 10, 2005 2. Field/Site Review of project area 3. Master Plan for Fallon Sports Park, prepared by Cardueci & Associate s, November 30, 2004 4. Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2002) 5. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update (2004) 6. City of Dublin General Plan (updated 2002) 7. Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amend went Environmental Impact Report and Addendum (1994)* 8. City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance 9. Geotechnical Investigation for Lin Property, prepared by Bergolar Geotechnical Consultants, November 1999 10. Environmental Assessment/Investigation for Hazardous Materials, Phase I & II, prepared by Kleinfelder Engineering, November 2004 11. Individual Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program — Area B-E (1997) 12. Individual Mitigated Negative Declaration for Dublin Ranch Area F (2000) 13. Initial Study and Addendum for Dublin Ranch Area B/F/E, PA 01-037 (2004) 14. Cultural Resource Survey. Dublin Ranch, Holman & Associates (June 1999) 15. Special -Status Species Survey. Pao Yeh Lin Property, H.T. Harvey Associates (October 1999) 16. U.S Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Fill Permit, dated May 23, 2003 17. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Opinion, dated July 1, 2002 18. Drainage and Hydrology Study for Dublin Ranch, MacKay & Somps (November 2003) 19, Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Quality Certification Order , dated April 22, 2003 20. California Department of Fish & Game 1603 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, dated June 5, 2003 21. Project Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TJKM Associates (October 1999 vv/2003 update) 22. Discussion with City Staff or affected Special Districts *Portions of the environmental setting, project impacts and mitigation measures for this Initial Study refer to environmental information contained in the 1994 Eastern Dublin Specific PlanIGeneral Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Report. (SCH 91103064). This document is referred to in the Initial Study as the 'Final Eastern Dublin E1R." Copies of this document, and all other documents referenced here , are available for public review at the City of Dublin Planning Department, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA, d uring normal business hours. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 25 April 26, 2005 I 3t ATTACHMENT TO INITIAL STUDY: DISCUSSION OF CHECICUST bliect Impacts and Mitigation Measures. L Aesthetics a-c) Significant impact on scenic vista, damage to scenic resource, degrade visual character of the site or create light or glare? Less -than -significant The project site is vacant and consists of gently rolling hills and valleys. Historically, grazing and cultivation of agricultural crops took place on the subject 60-aere parcel. The visual image of the land is formed by patterns of the soil that have been furrowed. The improvements proposed with the development of the sports fields and the other recreational amenities will, naturally, alter the appearance of the undisturbed farmland, but not to a potential significant level. The park use will continue to be an open space type use and be enhanced with landscaping and provide trail links to other open space acres. The development of the property as a park will provide scenic and landscaped views from Central Parkway to Lockhart Street and the trail along the creek corridor adjacent to the street and Gleason Drive. The parking lot areas accessed from Lockhart. Street and Central Parkway will be screened with improved landscaped areas and vegetation, as will the tennis courts and ball fields. From the residential areas west of the creek alignment and Lockhart Street, and those to the southwest and northeast of Fallon Road, the most prominent visual features will be the enhanced creek corridor along the park's western edge and the landscaping surrounding the park. The active recreational features and areas will be several hundred feet and across roadways from the homes. Views of the site arc limited to the immediate area and from the 1-580 freeway. Although, the proposed park is located one mile north of1-580 freeway, which is a designated scenic highway, the park is not within a scenic route. Visual impacts were addressed in the Eastern Dublin EIR (Impact TM 3.8/C. Obscuring of Distinctive Native Features) and it was determined that no measures would reduce the impacts to a less -than -significant degree. Other mitigation measures (3.8/4.0 through 4.5, 5.0 and 5,1) have been included in the Eastern Dublin EIR to reduce the impacts of hillside development. The EIR concluded this impact would be a potentially significant irreversible change and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council. The parcel of land where the park development is proposed is slightly hilly with an overall 4% slope and is at a lower elevation than much of the surrounding land. Specifically, the construction of park features and landscaping will benefit the existing visual character of the park. These improvements would provide street frontage landscaping, ranging from lawn areas to annual grasses, garden areas and trees, and improve the visual community landscape of the area. As visual quality was discussed in the earlier analyses of the community park site and addressed in the Final Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR, any development of urban uses in Eastem Dublin would inalterably change the character of the area. The development of a community park at this location was addressed by the previous documentation related to Area F, cited as references, and City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 26 April 26, 2005 1 Yr found to have a less-zhan-sigMficant effect on visual quality in the area, based on the resulting visual benefits to the community provided by the newly landscaped areas and the presence of the open space and recreational use. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR (EDSP EIR) and the subsequent documents related to Area F of Dublin Ranch will occur as a result of the proposed project. Additionally, measures to maintain the visual quality of the area, especially from views along scenic corridors in Eastern Dublin. Mitigation measures. 3.8/1.0 through 3.8/8.1of the EDSP EIR require that grading be done sensitively to reduce visual impacts. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project. d) Less -than -significant with Mitigation. The Master Plan for Fallon Sports Park contains information on the lighting needs for the uses at the park. The park will generally be open from dusk to dawn; however, the various sports fields, courts and associated parking lots will be lighted. The project may create additional light and glare for surrounding single-family residential neighborhoods. Low-level lighting will be used along walkways and trail. Sensor lighting lamps with low wattage are proposed for the parking area. New street lights and other security lighting combined with the night lighting for the courts and fields at the park could create a "spill over" effect oflight in the residential areas closest to the site, and may operate as late as 10:00 PM, The following mitigation measure will be added to the project to ensure that the lighting is adequate for the use and unobtrusive to surrounding residences: Mitigation Measure 1: A photometric study shall be provided with final construction drawings of the project prior to the issuance of an electrical permit for installation of any lighting. "Spill over" lighting shall be kept to a minimum to prevent disturbance and intrusion into residential areas through the use of lower lighting, with light standards for fields and courts designed to minimize the light intrusion into residential areas. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce the impact of nighttime lighting to a level of Iess-than-significant 11. Agricultural Resources a-c) Convert Prime Farmland, conflict with agricultural zoning or convert prime farmland to a non- agricultural use? Less -than -significant. Historically, grazing and cultivation of agricultural crops took place on the subject 60-acre parcel when it was part of the greater Dublin Ranch area. Surrounding areas near the park have been planned for conversion from agricultural use to urban and residential uses since 1994, The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Master Plan for Fallon Sports Park, the Negative Declaration prepared for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and other environmental analysis of Dublin Ranch and Area F in 1997, 2000 and 2004 have concluded that the area will be urbanized during the next five years. The park land contains no current agricultural zoning or farmland., and is zoned for use as a community park, consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan designation of Parks/Public Recreation & City Park. Approval and construction of the proposed project would allow further City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 27 April 26, 2005 I i+D development of land for a much needed sports field park to provide recreational activity areas for surrounding residents and the community. Discontinuation of agricultural use or loss of farmland of local importance were considered less -than -significant impacts in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR and previous environmental analyses for Dublin Ranch Area F. Therefore, less -than -significant impacts are anticipated with regard to prime farmland or loss of agricultural production for the sports park property. Based on information contained in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Nan Amendment EIR, no portion of the site is nor has been encumbered with a Williamson Act Land Conservation Agreement, Similarly, No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. lit Air Quality Environmental Setting The project is within the Amador Valley, a part of the Livermore sub -regional air basin distinct from the larger San Francisco Bay Area Basin. The Livermore sub -area basin is surrounded on all sides by high hills or mountains. Significant breaks in the hills surrounding the air basin are Niles Canyon and the San Ramon Valley, which extends northward into Contra Costa County. According to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR and other environmental studies, the terrain of the Amador Valley influences both the climate and air pollution potential of the sub -regional air basin. As an inland, protected valley, the area has generally lighter winds and a higher frequency of calm conditions when compared to the greater Bay Area, The occurrence of episodes of high atmospheric stability, known as inversion conditions, severely limits the ability of the atmosphere to disperse pollutants vertically. Inversions can be found during all seasons in the Bay Area, but are particularly prevalent in the summer months when they are present about 90% of the time in both morning and afternoon. Additionally, during the winter, the sheltering effect of terrain and its inland location results in frequent surface -based inversions. Linder these conditions pollutants such as carbon monoxide from automobiles and particulate matter generated by fireplaces and agricultural b-urning can become concentrated. According to the Bay Area Quality Management District, air pollution potential is high in the Livermore-Amador Valley, especially for ozone in the summer and fall. High temperatures increase the potential for ozone, and the valley not only traps locally generated pollutants but can be the receptor of ozone and ozone precursors from upwind portions of the greater Bay Area. Transport of pollutants also occurs between the Livermore Valley and the San Joaquin Valley to the east, Ambient air quality standards Both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board have City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 28 April 26, 2005 1 44 established ambient air quality standards for common pollutants. These ambient air quality standards are levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each pollutant. The ambient air quality standards cover what are called "criteria" pollutants because the health and other effects of each pollutant are described in criteria documents. The federal and California ambient air quality standards are summarized in Table 1 for important pollutants. The federal and state ambient standards were developed independently with differing purposes aid methods, although both federal and state standards are intended to avoid health -related effects. As a result, the federal and state standards differ in some cases. In general, the California state standards are more stringent. This is particularly true for ozone and PM10. Table 1. Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant Averaging Time Federal State Primary Standard Standard Ozone 1-Hour 0.12 PPM 0,09 PPM 8-Hour Carbon Monoxide 8-Hour 9 PPM 9.0 PPM 1-Hour 35 PPM 20 PPM Nitrogen Dioxide Annual Average 0.05 PPM 1-Hour 0.25 PPM Sulfur Dioxide Annual Average 0.03 PPM 24-Hour 0.14 PPM 0.25 PPM 1-Hour PM10 Annual Average 50 ug/m3 30 ugfin.3 24-Hour 150 ug/m3 50 ug/m3 PM2,5 Annual 15 ug/m3 24-Hour 65 ug/m3 PPM = Parts per Million -g/m3 = Micrograms per Cubic Meter Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1997 adopted new national air quality standards for ground -level ozone and for fine Particulate Matter, The existing 1-hour ozone standard of 0.12 PPM will be phased out and replaced by an 8-hour standard of 0.08 PPM. New national standards were retained, but the method and form for determining compliance with the standards were revised. Implementation of the new ozone and Particulate Matter standards has been complicated by a lawsuit. On May 14, 1999 the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a decision ruled that the Clean Air Act as applied in setting the public standards for ozone and particulate matter, was unconstitutional as an improper delegation of legislative authority to the Environmental Protection Agency. The decision has been appealed, but the legal status of the new City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 29 April 26, 2005 standards will probably remain uncertain for some time. Ambient air quality The project is within the nine -county Bay Area Basin. The Bay Area Quality Management District (BAAQMD) operates a network of air quality monitoring sites in the region, including one in central Livermore on Old First Street. Table 2 shows a summary of air quality data for this monitoring site for the period 1995-1999. Data are shown for ozone, carbon monoxide. PM10 and nitrogen dioxide. The numbers of days exceeding each standard are shown for each year. Table 2. Air Quality Data for Livermore, 1995-1999 Pollutant Standard Days Exceeding Standard In: 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Ozone Federal 1-Hour 7 8 0 6 2 Ozone State 1-Hour 20 22 3 21 14 Ozone Federal 8-Hour 11 10 0 10 5 Carbon State/Federal 0 0 0 0 0 Monoxide 8 Hour PM10 State 6 6 12 12 18 24-Hour PM10 Federal 0 0 0 0 24-Hour Nitrogen State 1-Hour 0 0 0 0 Dioxide Source: Air Sources Board Aeromettic Data Analys._s and Management System (ADAM) Table 2 shows that concentrations of carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide at the Livermore monitoring site meet state/federal standards. Ozone concentrations exceed both the state and federal standards, and exhibit wide variations from year-to-year related to meteorological conditions, Years where the summer months tend to be warmer than average tend to have higher average ozone concentrations while years with cooler than average temperatures tend to have lower average ozone concentrations. Levels of PM10 at Livermore meet the federal ambient standards but exceed the more stringent state standard. Attainment status The Federal Clean Air Act and the California Clean. Air Act of 1988 require that the State Air Resources Board, based on air quality monitoring data, designate air basins within the state where the federal or state ambient air quality standards are not met as "nonattainment areas." Because of the differences between the federal and state standards, the designation of nonattainment areas is different under the federal and state legislation. The Bay Area is currently a nonattainment area for the federal 1-hour ozone standard. Under the City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 30 April 26, 2005 California Clean Air Act the Bay Area is a nonattainment area for ozone and PM10. To meet federal Clean Air Act requirements, the District has adopted an Ozone Attainment Demonstration Plan. In addition, to meet California Clean Air Act requirements, the District has adopted and updated a Clean Air Plan addressing the California ozone standard. The control strategies contained into these plans include new limits on emissions from industry, prohibitions on sources of hydrocarbons, and buyback programs for older vehicles and educational programs. The California Legislature, when it passed the California Clean Air Act in 1988, recognized the relative intractability of the PMI 0 problem with respect to the state ambient standard and excluded it from basic planning requirements of the Act. The Act did require the Clean Air Resources Board to prepare a report to the Legislature regarding the prospect of achieving the State ambient air quality standard for PM10. This report recommended a menu of actions, but did not recommend imposing a planning process similar to that for ozone or other pollutants for achievement of the standard within a certain period of time. Sensitive receptors The Bay Area Air Quality Management District defines sensitive receptors as facilities where sensitive receptor population groups (children, the elderly, the acutely ill and the chronically ill) are likely to be located. These land uses include residences, schools, playgrounds, child-care centers, hospitals and medical clinics. This project would involve construction and development of new park and recreational facilities where children would play and gather for recreation. a) Would the project conflict or obstruct implementation of an air quality plan? No impact. The proposed project would not conflict with the local Clean Air Plan adopted by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, since the proposed amount of non-residential development has been included in Dublin's planned growth as part of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan EIR since 1994, a-nd would serve the existing community. Therefore, such impacts would be less -than -significant. b) Would the project violate any air quality standards? Less- than -significant with Mitigation. Short-term construction impacts related to implementation of the project, including grading and excavation, could result in exceeding air quality standards established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Adherence to Mitigation Measures nos. 3.11/1.0, 3.11/3.0, 3.11/4.0 and 3.11/12.0 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR has been included in the plans for the preliminary and subsequent grading of the property to reduce short-term air quality impacts to a less -than -significant level. These measures minimize the creation of fugitive dust during grading and construction activities with frequent watering of those areas, and also mandate that construction equipment be kept in proper running order at all times during construction. Additionally, certain mitigation measures for the control of fugitive dust arc incorporated into the preliminary grading plans to be implemented as part of the responsibility of the contractor, and monitored by the Inspector for the Project. These measures should be incorporated into the construction plans for the park project. The Eastern Dublin Specific City a Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 31 April 26, 2005 144 Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR concludes that potential air quality impacts related to construction equipment could not be mitigated to a less -than -significant impact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this impact. However, potential air quality impacts related to construction on the 60-acres of park development will be mitigated to a less -than - significant impact with the following measures related to air quality impacts incorporated into the future phases of project construction. Mitigation Measure 2: Dust control for the construction and earthwork for the project shall conform to the requirements of the SWPPP prepared by the City and established City standards. All active construction areas shall be watered daily and more frequently, if necessary. All trucks hauling soil, sand or other loose materials shall be covered. Water shall be applied daily, or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking area, and staging areas at construction sites. All paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites shall be swept daily with water sweepers. Hydroseed or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers to construction areas that have been graded. c) Would the project result in cumulatively considerable air pollutants? Less -than -significant The Eastern Dublin Specific.; Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR identifies Mobile Source Emissions and Stationary Source Emissions as significant irreversible impacts. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with certification of the EIR in 1994 and with subsequent environmental documents related to development of the Dublin Ranch Area F. Generally, such impacts are based on vehicular emission from future traffic within the sub -region as well as stationary sources. Similarly, potential air quality impacts related to vehicular traffic emissions on roadways of Reactive Organic Gasses and Nitrogen Oxide, both precursor indicators of smog, and stationary source emissions would not exceed regional air quality standards or thresholds. This project will not generate significant amounts of additional traffic beyond that considered in previous environmental documents, as it serves the existing community with a planned transportation network and roadways engineered to support the development . Therefore, vehicular emissions are estimated to be minimal and impacts would be less -than -significant. d, e) Expose sensitive receptors to significant pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors? Less -than -significant Proposed uses in the park will include softball, baseball and soccer fields; tennis and bocce courts; play areas; parking and street frontage improvements with landscaping; an enhanced stream/creekbed corridor; and, connecting trails. Air quality impacts associated with the proposed project are expected to be less- than -significant, as no significant pollutant concentration or creation of objectionable odors are anticipated from the park use and the improvements proposed for project. The only source of pollutants would be vehicles using the roadways adjacent to the park. These items were previously addressed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, the Mitigated Declaration in 2000 and the Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch. No further impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 32 April 26, 2005 4 C TV. Biological Resources a-d) Have a substantial adverse impact on special -status species, riparian features, movement offish or wildlife species, or conflict with California Fish & Game or US, liflildl(fe Service policies or regulations? Less-than-signIficant. Impacts from the project upon biological resources were thoroughly addressed in the earlier analysis of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, the Mitigated Declaration in 2000 and the Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch, and mitigation measures are currently being undertaken by the Developer of Dublin Ranch Area F (Toll Brothers) to enhance the stream/creek corridor along Lockhart Street and a portion of Gleason Drive, with some filling of wetlands and relocation of species such as tiger salamander and red -legged frog pursuant to USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers) and DFG (California Department of Fish and Game) permits (copies of pennits are contained in Appendices C). Biological analyzes and wetland delineations were conducted for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, as well as the Mitigated Declaration (2000) and the Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch, prior to the development of the preliminary grading plan and issuance of the USACE and DFG permits, describing both habitat and species present on the project site. Walking trails and other pathways proposed within the park boundaries, as well as proposed structures, are located on the site plan for Fallon Sports Park in accordance with setbacks and buffers approved by the USACE and DFG permits. A number of mitigation measures are included in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR to reduce significant impacts on biological resources, IM 3.7A through S, which still apply to the project site and reduce all such impacts to a less -than -significant level. Additionally, the Mitigated Declaration in 2000 for Area F contained two Supplemental Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 to protect special -species and wetlands in this planning area. There would be a less -than -significant impact on biological resources with the measures and the mitigation measures allowed under agency permits, currently underway at the project site. e, 0 Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological res•ources, such as tree protection ordinances. No impact. The Fallon Sports Park project's preliminary plan has been designed to be consistent with all Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, General Plan and other adopted policies and mitigation measures related to preservation and protection of biological resources. Mitigation measures are currently underway in accordance with USACE and DFG permits. Few trees are located on the Sports Park site due to the past agricultural cultivation of the land, and a substantial amount of landscaping and plantings will be installed on the site to enhance the appeal of the area and upgrade the present vegetation along the creek. Additionally, landscaping and vegetation will be installed around manmade structures and improvements proposed for the site. No known Heritage trees exist on the site. Additionally, the proposed project is not located within the boundaries of any Habitat City of Dublin Initial Study & Ivlitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 33 April 25, 2005 40 IV. Biological Resources a-d) Have a substantial adverse impact on special -status species, riparian features, movement offish or wildlife species, or conflict with California Fish & Game or U.S. Wildlife Service policies or regulations? e, 0 Less -than -significant. Impacts from the project upon biological resources were thoroughly addressed in the earlier analysis of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, the Mitigated Declaration in 2000 and the Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch, and mitigation measures are currently being undertaken by the Developer of Dublin Ranch Area F (Toll Brothers) to enhance the strearn/creek corridor along Lockhart Street and a portion of Gleason Drive, with some filling of wetlands and relocation of species such as tiger salamander and red -legged frog pursuant to USACE (United States Anny Corps of Engineers) and DFG (California Department of Fish and Game) permits (copies of permits are contained in the 2004 Addendum and incorporated here by reference). Biological analyzes and wetland delineations were conducted for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, as well as the Mitigated Declaration (2000) and the Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch, prior to the development of the preliminary grading plan and issuance of the USACE and DFG permits, describing both habitat and species present on the project site. Walking trails and other pathways proposed within the park boundaries, as well as proposed structures, are located on the site plan for Fallon Sports Park in accordance with setbacks and buffers approved by the USACE and DFG permits. A number of mitigation measures are included in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR to reduce significant irnpacts on biological resources, IM 3.7A through S, which still apply to the project site and reduce all such impacts to a less -than -significant level. Additionally, the Mitigated Declaration in 2000 for Area F contained two Supplemental Mitigation Measures 2 and 3 to protect special -species and wetlands in this planning area. There would be a less -than -significant impact on biological resources with the measures and the mitigation measures allowed under agency permits, currently underway at the project site. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree protection ordinances. No impact. The Fallon Sports Park project's preliminary plan has been designed to be consistent with all Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, General Plan and other adopted policies and mitigation measures related to preservation and protection of biological resources. Mitigation measures are currently underway in accordance with USACE and DFG permits, Few trees are located on the Sports Park site due to the past agricultural cultivation of the land, and a substantial amount of landscaping and plantings will be installed on the site to enhance the appeal of the area and upgrade the present vegetation along the creek. Additionally, landscaping and vegetation will be installed around manmade structures and improvements proposed for the site. No known Heritage trees exist on the site. Additionally, the proposed project is not located within the boundaries of any Habitat City of Dublin Page 33 Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005 Conservation Plan. No biological resource impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment FIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, as well as the Mitigated Declaration (2000) and the Addendum (2004) for Area F of Dublin Ranch, are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. In accordance with the approval conditions of the USAGE wetland fill permit dated May 23, 2003; U.S.Fish &Wildlife Service Biological Opinion dated July 1, 2002; RWQCB Water Quality Certification Order dated April 22, 2003; and, DFG 1603 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement dated June 5, 2003, mitigation measures applicable to the park site addressing impacts on candidate, sensitive or special status species have already been implemented, and the Developer has obtained all necessary permits from the appropriate State and Federal agencies. Based on implementation of these measures, species impacts are no longer considered to be applicable to this project. V. Cultural Resources a-d) Cause substantial adverse change to significant historic, archeological or paleontological resources or human remains? No inspact The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, identified a number of potentially significant impacts associated with development in East Dublin, including disruption or destruction of prehistoric resources, and disruption to historic resources. In May 1999, Holman and Associates performed an additional survey of the properties in Area F of Dublin Ranch, and no potentially significant prehistoric archaeological materials or indicators were found on the proposed park site. Although there are no historic structures/resources or known archeological or paleontological resources on this site, Mitigation Measure 3.9/5.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR establishes procedures in the event archeological resources are encountered during grading for development of the park. These measures have been incorporated into the grading project currently underway, and will be followed in the event that subsurface deposits are discovered during the continuing development of the Fallon Sports Park. No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, the Negative Declaration in 1997 for Areas B-E, as well as the Mitigated Declaration (2000) and the Addendum (2004) for Area F are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project. Therefore. No impacts are anticipated related to cultural resources because of implementation of the Park development. VI. Geology and Soils a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse impacts, including loss, injury or death related to ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, ground failure, landslide, substantial erosion, unstable soils, or liquefaction? Leo -than -significant Preliminary geotechnical reports were prepared for Area F in Eastern Dublin, including the subject Project site, as part of the environmental review for the properties with both the Negative Declaration in 1997 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration in 2000. A follow-up geotechnical survey for the Fallon Sports Park site was prepared by Berlogar Geoteehnical Consultants prior to the development of the preliminary grading plan prepared by MacKay & Somps in 2004 for the site, The recommendations of the geotechnical report have City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 34 April 26, 2005 It been incorporated into the preliminary plans for development of the site. The site is subject to groundshaking caused by a number of regional faults such as the Calaveras, Greenville, Hayward and San Andreas Faults. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR identifies several potential impacts to soils and geology, including earthquake and ground shaking, ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, impacts to groundwater resources, shrink -swell potential due to expansive soils, slope stability, erosion and sedimentation, in many locations in the Specific Plan planning area and established mitigation measures to be incorporated into projects in the area. As the site is not within a Special Study Zone for faults as identified by the State of California under the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone legislation, the potential for ground rupture is expected to be minimal. However, under moderate to severe seismic events which are probable in the Bay Area over the next 30 years, buildings, utilities and other improvements constructed at the Project site could be subject to damage caused by groundshaking. Mitigation Measures 3.6/1.0 through 8.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR were adopted to ensure that new structures built within Area F will comply with generally recognized seismic safety standards to reduce groundshaking impacts to a level of less -than -significant. The mitigation measures referred to also are consistent with the recommendations of the last geotechnical study for the site. b) Is the site subject to substantial erosion and/or loss of topsoil? Less -than -significant. The Eastern Dublin EIR notes that the impact of constructing all the land uses identified in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan would be an increase of erosion and sedimentation caused by grading activities. Consistent with adopted Mitigation Measures 3.6/27.0 of the EIR, the Conditions of Approval require preparation and implementation of interim erosion plans as part of grading plans and permitting. These requirements will be reflected in the plans prepared by MacKay & Somps in conjunction with City Public Works Department Staff. As noted in the 2000 Mitigated Declaration for Area F and the 2004 Addendum for Areas B-E, standard City of Dublin development Conditions of Approval require erosion control plans and preparation of a Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan to minimize the impacts of erosion and loss of soil. Project construction documents will reflect these conditions, and also ensure that all improvements to the park will comply with generally recognized seismic safety standards so that ground shaking or ground failure impacts would be reduced to a level of less -than -significant. Additionally, less -than -significant impacts are anticipated in the park phase related to soil or geotechnical hazards as the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer have been incorporated into the Project. c-d) Is the site located on soil that iv unstable or expansive, or result in potential lateral spreading, liquefaction, landslide or collapse? Less -than -significant. The Project site is located on the Tassajara Formation and contains areas of colluvium soil, and a small amount of landslide debris near the intersection of Lockhart Street and Central Parkway. The soil has a high shrink -swell potential, and Mitigation Measures 3.6/14.0through 16.0 of the Eastern Dublin EIR were adopted to reduce potential shrink -swell impacts to a level of less -than -significant by requiring appropriate structural foundations, underlying support for court and parking areas, and other related techniques to overcome the City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 35 April 26, 2005 I 4°7 adverse effects. No additional mitigation measures are required. Additionally, less -than - significant impacts are anticipated in the development of the park related to soil or geotechnical hazards as the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer have also been incorporated into the Project. e) Does the site have soils capable of supporting on -site septic tanks if sewers are not available? No impact. The park property is in the process of being connected to the sewer system with service provided by the Dublin San Ramon Services District. Therefore, there will be No impact related to septic tanks or systems. VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials a-d) Create a significant hazard through transport of hazardous materials or release or emission of hazardous material,s, and/or listed as a hazardous materials site? No impact. The proposed use of the site would include construction of recreational facilities for the Fallon Sports Park, and street frontage improvements along Central Parkway, Fallon Road and Lockhart Street. Recreational improvements on this site were discussed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, and have always been planned for this property. No hazardous material has been transported to or from the site, nor is anticipated to be done in the future as the site will be a public park. Phase I and Il hazardous materials studies were completed for the site by Berlogar Geotechnical Consultants in 1996 and 1997, which found no hazardous materials on the site. The site has not been listed as containing a historical hazardous site, hazardous material generator or transporter location, nor is it known to contain underground storage tanks according to the site assessments. Additionally, there is no change in the conclusion in the previous environmental documents for the site that only minor and less -than -significant quantities of potentially hazardous materials would be associated with the park use. Materials would include normal and customary substances such as lawn chemicals, household solvents and similar items in minimal quantities. Therefore, the project would not involve the use or transportation of hazardous material, and there would be No impact with regard to the release of hazardous materials. e, f) Is the site located within an airport land use plan of a public airport or private airstrip? No impact. The site is not located within an airport land use plan or within the vicinity of a public airport. The Livermore Municipal Airport and the ALUC confirmed in 1999 that the Area F Planning Area in Eastern Dublin was outside the referral area for the airport, and the ALUC has no jurisdiction over the land uses. Therefore, No impacts are anticipated regarding airport noise and crash hazard zones. g,h) Interference with an emergency evacuation plan, expose people and structures to a significant risk involving wildland fires, and are nearby residences intermixed with wildlands? City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 36 April 26, 2005 150 No impact. Since the project would convert undeveloped land to a paved parking lot, and recreational facilities with associated structures, the proposed driveways with entry features from Lockhart. Street and Central Parkway will provide adequate emergency access. Adequate emergency access as shown on the Master Plan for the park has been approved hy the Alameda County Fire Department which provides services to Dublin, Additionally, a Fire Station is located adjacent to the park with access from Fallon Road. Due to the provision of adequate access to and from the site, there would be No impact with regard to any emergency evacuation plans. Additionally, the project site is presently vacant grassland, but in the future, based on plans approved by the City and ensuing construction, the adjacent lands will soon be an urbanized area. The park will be improved with irrigation from new water lines and services that will be regularly maintained, as will the surrounding future developed area. Therefore, the risk of wildland fire is anticipated to be minimal, and No impact is expected relative to wildfires in the project area. VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality a-i) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, deplete groundwater resources, alter drainage patterns, effect surface or subsurface water quality, result in placing housing in a flood plain? Less -than -significant. Portions of the Project site are characterized by slopes above 5 %, An intermittent creek flows along the west boundary of the site and proceeds to the east slightly across the northwest comer of the property near the intersection of Lockhart Street and Fallon Road. Improvements and preliminary grading is currently in process at the site as part of the larger Area F project. In accordance with the approval conditions of the TISACE wetland fill permit dated May 23, 2003; U.S.Fish &Wildlife Service Biological Opinion dated July 1, 2002; RWQCB Water Quality Certification Order dated April 22, 2003; and, DFG 1603 Lake and Streamhed Alteration Agreement dated June 5, 2003, mitigation measures applicable to addressing impacts on creek on the park site and water quality provisions have already been implemented, and the Developer of Area F has obtained all necessary permits from the appropriate State and Federal agencies. Additionally, the project preliminary grading plan conforms to Alameda County Flood Control and Water Quality District, Zone 7 requirements and meets the water quality standards of the City of Dublin's NPDES permit and the Alameda County Urban Runoff Clean Water Program. The contractor selected by the City to develop park project will be responsible for obtaining all permits necessary from Zone 7 prior to construction, and follow all provisions of the City's SWPPP and the Water Quality Control Board requirements. These requirements will be reflected by the plans prepared by MacKay & Somps in conjunction with City Public Works Department Staff. As noted in the 2000 Mitigated Declaration for Area F and the 2004 Addendum for Areas B-E, standard City of Dublin development Conditions of Approval require erosion control plans and preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. No additional water quality impacts are anticipated. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 37 April 26, 2005 151 Although the Eastern Dublin EIR acknowledges that grading and recontouring of the land for the park will change existing natural drainage patterns, the existing creek on the site will be improved and enhanced, and swales will be constructed to filter and absorb stormwater and run- off at the site, Diagrams of the utility systems, including pipes, culverts, drainage and stormwater systems are included in the Master Plan for the Fallon Sports Park, and are currently being installed at the site with the appropriate permits under the development plan for Area F, Adherence to mitigation measures nos. 3.5/20.0, 3.5/44.0, 3.5/47.0 through 3.5/55.0 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment ELR requiring proper drainage and run-off control, and the use of biodegradable pesticides and. herbicides, will reduce surface water quality pollution and provide the proper drainage facilities for the site, thereby reducing the impacts on water quality and drainage to a level of less -than -significance. Additionally, the City Public Works Department has performed extensive hydrology and drainage studies to insure that all stormwater and drainage facilities constructed for the park contain sufficient capacity to service the projected development of the Master Plan for the Park, The site is not located within a 100-year flood plain as identified on the applicable Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Construction of the Fallon Sports Park recreational facilities will be consistent with all the previous actions and environmental documentation approved by the City of Dublin for east Dublin, No impacts not previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR are expected to occur. IX. Land Use and Planning a) Physically divide an established community? No impact. The project is consistent with the General Plan and planned recreational and open space uses in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR and in the plans for Area F. As this property has always been planned to be an open space type use, it is a consolidated open area consisting of 60 acres on the eastern edge of Area F. adjacent to Fallon Road. Residential development exists across Fallon Road, and is currently being constructed by Toll Brothers adjacent to the future extension of Lockhart Street. To the east of the park site, additional urbanization, predominately residential, is anticipated to occur in the future in the East Dublin Property Owners development. No residential subdivision or community is divided by the park as all the uses have been master planned in an orderly fashion. Therefore, there would be no disruption of any established community because the proposed facilities for Fallon Sports Park are designed to serve new and existing development in east Dublin, providing recreational facilities within walking distant to residents and community access routes. Therefore, the park development will result in no negative or adverse impact on land use or the community. h) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation? City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 38 April 26, 2005 No impact. The Fallon Sports Park Phase project is consistent with the goals and policies contained in both the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan, which indicate that these facilities are needed to serve the growing population in east Dublin and the other growing areas of the cotnrnunity. The Specific Plan and General Plan land use maps include the designation for this park site as a City Park and Park, and refer to the Dublin Parks and Recreation Master Plan, recently updated in 2004, for a description of the land use activities and types of facilities to be provided in the park. Additionally, the Master Plan for the Fallon Sports Park is a comprehensive plan for the development of the recreational facilities to serve the activity needs of the surrounding cornmunity, and proposes ballfields and sports courts consistent with the projected uses in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The Park site is also located near a planned school site, and will be used by schools as needed for recreational activities and events. The City presently does not have a recreational facility of this size that will serve the organized sports popular in a growing community. Therefore, the park development is consistent with all land use plans, policies and regulations of the City, and will result in no negative or adverse impact on land use. c) Conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No impact. No such plan has been adopted within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. There would, therefore, be No impact to a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan for the existing site. X. Mineral Resources a, b) Result in the loss of availability of regionally or locally significant mineral resources? No impact. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR does not indicate that significant deposits of minerals exist on the site. Additionally, the site is not shown as a location for mineral or aggregate resources on State Mineral Resource maps. No impacts related to the loss of mineral resources would occur as a result of the project. XL Noise a-d) Would the project expose persons or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established by the General Plan or other applicable standard, expose people to groundborne vibration, or result in permanent increases in ambient noise levels? Less -than -significant. Major sources of noise on and adjacent to the Project site include distant noise generated by vehicles traveling through the Eastern Dublin planning area on I-580, traffic sources on Tassajara Road and from aircraft flyovers. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR addressed potential noise impacts of adopting and implementing the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan, which included the development of Area F and the Fallon Sports Park. Short-term noisc-related impacts were identified in the EIR which included exposure of residents to increased levels of noise from construction of proposed residential, park and improvement development in east Dublin. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 39 April 26, 2005 Mitigation measure nos. 3,10/4.0 and 3,10/5,0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR require individual project builders to prepare construction noise management plans to minimize noise as well as adhere to construction hour limitations. City of Dublin standard Conditions of Approval required by the Public Works Department for all projects constructed in the City also include preparation of a construction noise management plan and construction hour limitations. Including these measures in all construction phases for the project will mitigate or minimize construction noise impacts to a level of less -than -significant. However, short-term construction related noise could be expected which would be considered significant depending on the specific type of equipment used in the grading process for the parking lot and various sports courts and paved areas. The City has adopted common practices for all construction and grading operations, and which are included in the construction documents for the Project, to limit the hours of construction to 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, including the idling of equipment, unless the Director of Public Works approves alternative hours. Additionally, all equipment used on the construction site is to be in good, well -maintained condition, and mufflers, to minimizemoise generation that could affect the residents in the area of the park. Therefore, noise -related impacts of the project will be reduced to a less -than -significant impact. e, f) No impact. The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, public use airport, or a private airstrip. Therefore, the project will not expose people in the project area to excessive noise levels. XII. Population and Housing a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? No impact. Implementation of planned recreational facilities will not induce additional growth in Eastern Dublin that has not been projected for in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, and subsequent environmental documents, The proposed recreational facility and community park were planned well in advance of actual development in the eastern area of the City to serve projected residential units and those already planned and approved. 'Therefore, no population growth impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. b, e) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing units or people? No impact. The project site is designated as a park on the Dublin General Plan, and a City Park in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan for residents in the immediate and surrounding areas of Dublin, The site is currently being developed as parkland with preliminary grading underway with appropriate permits as part of the approved and permitted development of Area F. The property has never been designated for housing nor previously developed for such use. Displacement of housing units or people, therefore, would not occur. Additionally, the site was vacant and undeveloped prior to construction of other development in the area. EDSP Mitigation measures 3.4/20.0 through 3.4/35.0 are designed to ensure that adequate parks and recreational facilities are provided in the community near residential development to serve the growing population of Dublin. This project is planned to serve the residential growth and residents City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 40 April 26, 2005 in the immediate area based on the park standards in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Therefore, No impacts related to displacement of housing units or people are anticipated. XIII. Public Services a-c) Potential impacts related to: fire protection, police protection, schools, maintenance, or solid waste generation? No impact. Construction and operation of the proposed recreational facilities will not create a need for new public services or facilities. The Alameda County Fire Department and the Dublin Police Department have reviewed the project to ensure that the facility meets their criteria for public use. An additional fire station has been built in the east Dublin area adjacent to the Park site to serve the planning area. Additionally, the park plan has been designed in conjunction with security criteria provided by the Police Department. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, as a basis for the provision of the Fallon Sports Park at this location, included sufficient fire safety resources to serve the projected growth and facilities in the area. The City of Dublin will provide maintenance of streets, roads, the park and other related governmental facilities. Solid Waste service will be provided by the Livermore Dublin Disposal Company. As these services will already be extended to the Area F planning arca, no significant impacts related to public services is anticipated. XIV. Recreation a, b) Would the project increase use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or require the construction of new recreational facilities? No impact. The proposed project does not include residential development, so there would be no increase in the need for or impact on recreational facilities. The project would add a much needed recreational facility with various types of active recreational uses to the east Dublin area, thereby increasing the City's recreational resources and facilities to serve the community. No adverse impact related to recreational facilities will result, but rather, the park development will provide more recreational activities and facilities and opportunities for the neighborhoods being developed in east Dublin and for the public's use. Based on the criteria of the updated Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2004), a standard requirement of 3.5 acres of community parkland is needed per 1,000 residents. Area F is anticipated to have a population of 2,725 residents in the planning area at build -out. Approximately 10 acres of community parkland would be needed for Area F, and the Fallon Sports Park at 60 acres well exceeds the community parkland requirement for the planning area. Therefore, the Project will have a beneficial impact on the provision of park facilities, and not have an adverse impact on park or recreational facilities. XV, Transportation/Traffic a-g) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial to existing traffic load and street capacity, exceed LOS standards for CMA roadways, change of air traffic patterns, increase traffic safety hazard, provide for inadequate emergency vehicle access, inadequate parking , provide hazard City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 41 April 26, 2005 s-r or barrier to alternative transportation modes? Less-than-sign(ficant. To implement the transportation and circulation aspects of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan based on future land use projections with existing, the City has undertaken a comprehensive program of transportation improvements in the community. The purpose of this program is to accommodate anticipated traffic from the Eastern Dublin area. Overall, the program includes upgrades to the 1-580 freeway intersections, construction of new roads and improvements to existing roads. These improvements are required to be installed by the developer of a specific project which will be generating additional traffic in the area, or through the Capital Improvement Program (C1P). Improvements are primarily funded from fees collected from new development in eastern Dublin. Traffic Impacts & Improvements: An extensive traffic analysis was prepared for the original Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan EIR approved in 1994 to establish this program. That analysis identified 16 potentially significant and potentially cumulatively significant impacts related to the development of the Specific Plan. Although many of these impacts could be reduced to a level of less -than -significance, a Statement of Overriding Consideration was adopted for impacts to mainline 1-580 and 1-680 freeways; cumulative freeway impacts; Santa Rita & 1-580 eastbound freeway ramps due to existing level of traffic; and, cumulative impacts on Dublin Boulevard. Additionally, the 1997 Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Areas B-E, in which the Fallon Sports Park property was included for community park use, did not identify new or supplemental impacts or mitigation measures in addition to those already identified in the early environmental document. The 2000 Mitigated Negative Declaration identified a number of supplemental mitigation measures to be implemented with the Dublin Ranch Area A project as a result of changes to the Land Use Plan of the Specific Plan, but not as a result of proposed community park use. Less -than -significant impacts are anticipated with regard to traffic and parking for the proposed recreational improvements at the Fallon Sports Park site. Several new traffic improvements and extensions of roadways are underway at the present time to facilitate the overall development scheme for Area F. The existing and proposed roadway improvements in Area F have been designed, sized and approved to provide adequate transportation facilities and transit modes with sufficient capacity for the park use. The following extensions and improvements will be completed prior to the completion of Phase 1 of the Fallon Sports Park (see Exhibit E for phasing); • Lockhart Street is proposed for extension with the development underway for Area F, and is projected to be completed in 2005; • Central Parkway is proposed for extension in fiscal year 2005-2006; • Fallon Road will be improved in fiscal year 2005-2006; • A traffic signal will be installed at the Gleason Drive/Fallon Road intersection in fiscal year 2005-2006; and, • A second traffic signal may be installed at the main entry to the Park on Lockhart Street if CalTrans warrants are met. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 42 April 26, 2005 An October 23, 2003 Traffic Study prepared by TJKM for the design of Lockhart Street proposed on four-way intersection on Lockhart Street at the entrance to the park. The current plan for the Park shows two intersections on Lockhart Street: one at the main entrance to the Park and the second across from the pedestrian bridge. Both these intersections will connect with streets from the adjacent neighborhoods. At the present time, there has been no study of the entry location off Central Parkway. Although this is the preferred location of the Central Parkway entrance, further study of this entrance is needed to determine the optimum location as future multi -family development is planned across from the Park on Central Parkway. A mitigation measure is proposed as follows: Mitigation Measure3; Future study of specific location of the entrance to the Park from Central Parkway shall he completed prior to development of the Lower Terrace Phase of the Project, with consideration given to thc potential multi -residential land use across Central Parkway from the Park. Impacts related to transportation are anticipated to be reduced to a less -than -significant level with the mitigation measure above and those included in the mitigation for the development of Area F, in process at this time. Parking Analysis/Study: No impact. Additionally, a parking study was prepared for the Master Plan for the sports park by Carducci & Associates which analyzed the parking needs for the various recreational activities and sports fields planned for the Park. The parking study anticipated the parking needs for each type of recreational facility, activity, court, or field proposed for the Park, and determined that approximately 500 parking spaces would be needed to serve park users. The Park is also designed with pedestrian connections to the various surrounding neighborhoods and the school site across Lockhart Street. Due to spatial and grading constraints, and the location of environmentally sensitive areas adjacent to the creek, a total of 459 spaces are proposed for location within the boundaries of the park, and divided between the two proposed parking lots accessed by Lockhart Street and Central Parkway (see Master Plan Exhibit B). An additional 84 on -street parking spaces will also be available for a total of 524 parking spaces. Overflow parking on late afternoons, evenings and weekends will be able to park in the lots of the school on Lockhart Street. Therefore, no adverse impacts relative to parking areas are anticipated. Pedestrian Circulation &Pathways: No impact. A system of pathways will provide access for pedestrians to all areas of the Park. The pathway system also provides neighborhood connections to promote community use of the facility from all sides of the Park. All pathways on the site are accessible and connect to perimeter sidewalks along the Park boundaries, and to the Tassajara bike trail. A pedestrian bridge on the southern portion of Lockhart Street will provide access from the proposed school and on -street parking. As this system of pathways and walkways will provide complete access to all areas of the Park and surrounding neighborhoods and trails, there are no adverse impacts related to pedestrian and bike access. City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 43 April 26, 2005 XVI. Utilities and Service Systems a-g) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB, require new or expanded water or wastewater treatment facilities, require new storm drain facilities, require additional water supplies, require new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities, or require new solid waste facilities? No impact. Since the subject site is within an area where the extension of urban services is underway, and in adjacent areas already available, the construction of the proposed recreation facilities will not increase the need for additional water or wastewater services. Some service connections are anticipated prior to opening the facilities for public use. The project was taken into consideration when the water and wastewater facilities where planned for the east Dublin area, and considered in the previous environmental documents prepared for Area F. Therefore, there will be no need for additional mitigation measures than those already established by the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR. XV. Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? No impact. The preceding analysis indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse impact on overall environmental quality, including biological resources or cultural resources, with the implementation of mitigation measures included in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR, as discussed in this document. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable fiaure projects). No impact. Although incremental increases in certain areas can be expected as a result of constructing this project, including air emissions, light and glare, the project site lies within an area with an approved specific plan which permits urbanized development and community facilities. Mitigation measures are included in an approved EIR that would reduce any residual impacts on the surrounding residential community to Iess-than-significant levels. c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No impact. No such impacts have been discovered in the course of preparing this Initial Study. City of Dublin Page 44 Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 April 26, 2005 15 t BACKGROUND INFORMATION INITIAL STUDY PREPARER Janet Harbin, Senior Planner City of Dublin Community Development Department AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED The following agencies and organizations were contacted in the course of this Initial Study: • City of Dublin Community Development Department City of Dublin Parks and Community Services Department City of Dublin Public Works Department City of Dublin Police Department Alameda County Fire Department, Dublin Division REFERENCES City of Dublin General Plan, updated November 2002. City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. 2000. Construction Project Plans for Fallon Sports Park, prepared by MacKay & Somps, dated November 10, 2004. Geotechnical Investigation for Fallon Park, prepared by Kleinfelder Engineering, November 22, 2004. Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (with updates) Eastern Dublin Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Report., Wallace Roberts and Todd, 1994, and subsequent Negative Declarations & Mitigated Negative Declarations. Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 1994, with update in 2004. Final Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Wallace Roberts and Todd, 1998. Master Plan for Fallon Sports Park, prepared by Carducci & Associates, November 30, 2004 City of Dublin Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park PA 05-021 Page 45 April 26, 2005 FALLON SPORTS PARK DEVELOPMENT & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PA 05-021 LETTERS OF COMMENT RECEIVED WITH RESPONSES A) Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District - Zone 7 B) City of Livermore ATTACHMENT 4 110V 2 CITY OF i)LIFILIN 100 GM° Plaza, 1.30lin, Oalrfornia 9,I50 WebSite: http;//www.C.i.dublin.ca.11S May 26, 2005 Jim Horen, Principal Engineer Advance Planning Section Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7 100 North Canyons Parkway Livermore, CA 94551 RE: Comments on Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park (PA 05-021) Dear Mr. Horen: The City appreciates your comments of May 13, 2005 on the Fallon Sports Park (PA 05-021) project proposed in eastern Dublin, The Master Plan for the Fallon Sports Park was approved in November 2004, and implemented the park established by the East Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment adopted in 1994. Since the original conception of the plan for the Park, the City Council has also adopted a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2004), which addressed the features and locations of the proposed facilities for the Sports Park. Regarding your first comment relative to the fees that the Applicant will be required to pay for Zone 7's review of the project, the City of Dublin collects the Zone 7 fees at the Building Permit stage, and then forwards the funds to Zone 7. In this case, because the sportsfield park project is a City sponsored project on land dedicated to the City through the agreement related to Dublin Ranch Area F, the City intends to pay any and all required fees to the various permitting agencies prior to development and improvement of the Fallon Sports Park. Payment of these fees was included as a mitigation measure in the Eastern Dublin General Plan/Specific Plan EIR and the Mitigation Monitoring Program applicable to this Project. In response to DSRSD's second comment, the project does not propose to improve or enhance the stream corridor as it is not within the boundaries of the park area, The improvement and enhancement of the corridor is underway as part of the development of Area F of Dublin Ranch and was analyzed in previous environmental documents for that project (1997 Negative Declaration, 2000 Mitigated Negative Declaration, and 2004 Addendum), as stated in the Fallon Sports Park Development Initial Study on page 33 and 34. DSRSD reviewed the environmental documents and improvement plans, including the hydrology study, in their review of the Dublin Ranch Area F and Dublin Ranch Area F North Projects prior to issuance of grading permits for that project. This information is on file with the District. All appropriate p -rmits from USACE, CDF&G and RWQCB were obtained prior to the commencement of the grading and improvement activities for the Area F projects, as detailed on page 33 of the Fallon Sports Park Development Initial Study. Any site -specific mitigation measures relative to Fallon Sports Park such as landscaping around manmade structures, parking areas, and sportsfields and courts are contained in the Initial Study for PA 05-021. Other potential impacts of the project will be reduced to a Area Code (925) • City Manager 833-6650 • City Council 833-6650 • Personnel 833-6605 • Economic Development 833-6650 Finance 833-8840 • Patine Works/Engineering 833-6630 • Parks 8, Community Services 833-6845 • POliee 833-6670 Planning/Code Enforcement 833-6610 • Building Inspection 833-6620 • Fire Prevention Bureau 833-6606 P111110CI on Recycled Paper Letter to Zone 7 — Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park Development Page 2 PA 05-021 level of insignificance with the mitigation measures contained in the Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Fallon Sports Park project will not result in significant effects on the environment. Should you have any further comments or questions, please contact me at (925) 833-6610. Sin ely, anet Harbin Senior Planner Cc: Mayor & City Councilmembers Rich Ambrose, City Manager Diane Lowart, Parks and Community Services Dir. Herma Lichtenstein, Park and Facilities Dev. Mngr. Paul Kruger, Consulting Engineer 070-- ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 100 NORTH CANYONS PARKWAY, LIVERMORE, CA 94551 PHONE {925) 454-500o May 13, 2005 Ms. Janet Harbin, Senior Planner City of Dublin Planning Department 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Re: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Fallon Sports Park Dear Ms. Harbin: Zone 7 has reviewed the referenced CEQA document and we have several comments, which are made in the context of Zone 7's mission to provide drinking water, non -potable water for agriculture and irrigated turf, flood protection, and groundwater and stream management in the Livermore-Arnador Valley. Our comments are as follows: • Mitigation for the creation of new impervious surface areas within the Livermore-Amador Valley is addressed through the collection of Special Drainage Area (SDA) 7-1 Drainage Fees. These fees are collected for Zone 7 by the appropriate local governing agency upon approval of the vesting tentative or final map for new streets/developments andlor upon approval of any new building/grading/use permit required of any public agency/commercial/residential/ industrial/agricultural user. Collection of the drainage fees is dependent upon whether post - project impervious surface area conditions are greater than pre -project conditions and/or whether fees have previously been paid for that particular site. The current fee is S0.662 per square feet of new impervious surface area. The project proposes to enhance an existing stream corridor located along the western edge of the project site for environmental mitigation purposes in the development of "Area F. The Hydrology and Water Quality section of the Initial Study, page 37, states that the "project preliminary grading plan conforms to Alameda County Flood Control and Water Quality District, Zone 7 requirements and ...." Please be advised that this creek is not currently designated as a Special Drainage Area 7-1 Authorized Project Line, nor is it. currently owned/maintained by Zone 7. The jurisdiction of this creek does not belong to Zone 7. Therefore, at this time, there are not any Zone 7 permits and/or other Zone 7 requirements placed on this project. Also, note that Zone 7 is part of Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and is not a Water Quality District. For our future use, we would very much appreciate it if you could provide us information on where this creek drains to and ,gCEIVe15° provide a copy of the hydrology study, ,AV I' -6 'MS ,,LANNING • Ms. Janet Harbin City of Dublin Planning Department May 13, 2005 Page 2 1(3 We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this document. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jack Fong at (925) 454-5035 or myself at (925) 454-5019 at your earliest convenience. Sincer ly, irn Boren Principal Engineer Advance Planning Section .11-1:JF:arr cc: Joe Seto, Zone 7 Jack Fong, Zone 7 Mary Lim, Zone 7 P,.'vldvpianklackrEQA-FailorapaisParkdot CITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plan, Dublin, Gall fornia 9456a vveosito: http://www.ci.dUblin.ca_LiS May 26, 2005 Jennifer Craven Associate Planner City of Livermore 1052 S. Livermore Ave. Livermore, CA 94550 RE: Comments on initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park (PA 05-021) Dear Ms. Craven: The City appreciates your comments dated May 12, 2005 on the Fallon Sports Park (PA 05-021) project proposed in eastern Dublin. As stated in the Initial Study(Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, the Master Plan for the Fallon Sports Park was approved in November 2004, to implement the park established by the East Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment adopted in 1994. Since the original conception of the plan for the Park, the City Council has also adopted a new Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2004), which addressed the features and locations of the proposed facilities for the Sports Park. Below are the City of Dublin's responses to your comments. The numbered paragraphs below correspond to the comment sections in your letter: 1) Regarding your first comment related to the connection between the description of a "community park" and a "sports park," and whether a "sports park" is indeed a "community park," the Parks & Recreation Master Plan was done in concert with the East Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment and the associated Environmental Impact Report adopted in 1994 and subsequent Supplemental EIR's and Addendums. The Community Park that is referred to in the East Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment adopted in 1994 is referred to in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan as a Sports Park. There is a prototype in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan which identifies the types of facilities that were to be in the park. The Fallon Sports Park Master Plan used this prototype as a basis for the plan adopted in November 2004. Furthermore, the Fallon Sports Park at approximately 60 acres exceeds the minimum acreage required for a community park in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan . 2) Comment noted. On page 27 of the Initial Study for the development of the Fallon Sports Park, it is stated that: Low-level lighting will be used along walkways and trail. Sensor lighting lamps with low wattage are proposed for the parking area. New street lights and other security lighting combined with the night lighting for the courts and fields at the park could create a "spill Arca Code (925) • City Manager 833-6650 • City Counoil 833-060 • Personnel 833-6605 • Economic Development 833-6650 Finance 833-8840 • Public Works/Engineering 833-6630 • Parks & Community Services 833-66416 • Police 833-6670 Pianning/Code Enforcement 833-66'10 • Building Inspection 833-6620 • Fire Prevention Bureau 833-6606 Printed on ReCyrMW Paper Letter to City of Livemiore — Mitigated Negative Declaration Fallon Sports Park Development Page 2 lc,95 PA 05-021 over" effect of light in the residential areas closest to the site, and may operate as late as 10:00 PM The following mitigation measure will be added to the project to ensure that the lighting is adequate for the use and unobtrusive to surrounding residences: Mitigation Measure 1: A photometric study shall be provided with final construction drawings of the project prior to the issuance of an electrical permit for installation of any lighting. "Spill over lighting shall be kept to a minimum to prevent disturbance and intrusion into residential areas through the use of lower lighting, with light standards for fields and courts designed to minimize the light intrusion into residential areas. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce the impact of nighttime lighting to a level of less -than -significant• This mitigation measure is included as a mitigation measure in the Eastern Dublin General Plan/Specific Plan EIR and the Mitigation Monitoring Program applicable to this Project (see attached Exhibit). The assumption used in the environmental document regarding the effects of the park lighting on aircraft flying approximately 700 feet or higher above the ground is that if "spill over" lighting is kept to a minimum so it does not intrude on the nearby residences, based on the photometric study, and is directed toward the playing fields and courts, it would not have adverse effects on aircraft above the park. There is absolutely no reason to direct lighting for the park toward aircraft in the sky. However, the study will include verification that this assumption is indeed correct. 3) It is acknowledged that aircraft from the Livermore Airport regularly flies over a portion of Eastern Dublin where the Fallon Sports Park is located. This was discussed in regard to the expansion of the Livermore Airport and the use of larger, heavier aircraft related to the expanded airport in the correspondence from the City of Dublin to the Livermore Airport District and the City of Livermore earlier this year and in 2004. It was not identified as a significant hazard related to the present airport use type. The Livermore Airport Master Plan Advisory Committee's Negative Declaration document for the airport expansion stated that overflights contribute little to anThient noise levels in Livermore where they originate, and did not evaluate the noise resulting from the larger aircraft to be used at the expanded facility. The previous Dublin environmental documents which evaluated the environmental and noise impacts of development of a park on the subject property, the Eastern Dublin General Plan/Specific Plan EIR and the associated Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted in 1994, the Negative Declaration for Areas B and E of Dublin Ranch approved on November 18, 1997, the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Area F of Dublin Ranch approved on February 15, 2000, and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Area F in 2004, were incorporated by reference in the Initial Study for the Fallon Sports Park development (page 7 of the Initial Study). The Initial Study for the 2004 Mitigated Negative Declaration for Area F of Dublin Ranch in 2004 reviewed the proposed reconfiguration of uses, including the use of 60 acres for a community park. Included in the Initial Study was a detailed analysis of the existing noise sources in the vicinity of the project site, and identification of areas subject to unacceptable noise levels exceeding 60 decibels. The major sources of noise identified in the documents were the traffic on 1-580, some local streets in Area F of Dublin Ranch, and aircraft flyovers. Mitigation Measures for noise (Mitigation Measures 3.10/1.0 and 3.10/3.0-5.0), which was determined to be a less -than -significant impact in the area with mitigation, were addressed by Letter to City ofLivermore — Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 3 'Leto PA 0S-021 Fallon Sports Park Development these documents and are included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program in the attached Exhibit matrix. Relative to the park use, short-term construction noise was an issue of concerti and Mitigation Measures incorporated into the park project will reduce the level of short-term construction noise to a less -than -significant level, The proposed park area was not identified as a location subject to excessive long-term noise exceeding 60 decibels, unlike some residential subdivisions which are surrounded by sound walls due to traffic noise. Therefore, no further mitigation for noise impacts, including those resulting from aircraft flyovers, is necessary. Please refer to Response under Comment 2, above, related to hazards resulting from park lighting on aircraft. 4) Comment acknowledged regarding distances from the Project site to the Livermore Airport. Please refer to Response under Comment 3, above, regarding noise impacts. Based on the environmental documents prepared by Dublin for the project site, and those prepared to the Livermore Airport Expansion project, there is no need to disclose noise hazards to potential park users. Should you have any further comments or questions, please contact me at (925) 833-6610. Sincerely, anet Harbin Senior Planner Cc: Mayor & City Councilmernbers Rich Ambrose, City Manager Diane Lowart, Parks and Community Services Dir. Herma Lichtenstein, Park and Facilities Dev. Mngr. Paul Kruger, Consulting Engineer ADM / NISTRATION BUILDING 1052 S, Livermore Aveilue Livermore. CA 945504899 Ph; (925) 960-40(41 . Fax: (925] 960405E TDD (925) 960-4104 www.ci.liYeT111Gre,MIAIS N1AVOR COUNCIL Ph; 9G0-40S0. Fax 960-4025 CITY MANAGER Ph. 966-4040 • Fax: 960-4045 CITY ATTORNEY Ph: 960-4150 • Fax; 960-4100 RISK MANAGEMENT ph: 960-4 70 • Fax: 960.4104 CITY CJ IRK Ph: 960-4200 • Fax: 960-4205 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ph: 960-4400 • Fax 7 960'4459 Building Division ph: 960_44.10. Fax: 9604419 Engenddrilig Divlxian Ph: 960-4500 • Fax: 960-4505 Rousing Boman Services Division 960-4580 • Fax 9404149 Planning P5; 960-4450* Fax: 960-4459 ECONOMIC DEVKLOPMENT Ph: Q(50-4140 • 960-4149 FINANCE DEPARTM I. Ph: 960-130(1 Fax 960-4309 FERE num RTMENT 4560 Ead Avenue 434-2;i4I • Fax: 454-2367 LIBRARY 1000 S. Lirecmore Avenue p0: 373-5500 • Fax: 373-5563 )101 AN RIOSOURCES ph: 960,4 WO* Fax: 960411J5 POLICE DEPARTMENT Livermore AvunLic Ph: .371-9900 • Fax: 371-4950 TDD 311-4982 PUBLIC SERVICES 3500 Rthertson Park Rd. Ph: 908-8000* Fax; 960-800$ 4 irperi 636 "Vcrrrinal Circie Ph: 373-5280* Fax: 373-5042 Goff COMM Dirivinn 909 Cl1LbhralS6 DriVC. P11: 373-5239 * Fax: 373-5203 Maintenance Divisive 3500 Robertson Park Rd. 960-8020 * Fax: 960-8025 Waxer Reconrces Divixian 1.01 W . Jack I..ondffr: Blvd. Ph; 960-8100 Fax: 960-8105 wr../te Country ,crttce 1849" RECEI MAY 1 6 DUBUN f—Ir t.,ITY OF LIVE 1 ORE tD1 Janet Harbin, Senior Pinner City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 RE: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for proposed City of Dublin Fallon Sports ark Development (PA 05-021) Dear Ms. Harbin: 1 Thank for you providing the City of Livermore the opportunity to review and comment on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the proposed Fallon Sports Park. Liveiniore's concerns with the environmental analysis and proposed sports park generally focus on the location of the sports park, and the subsequent interplay of sports park operations with aircraft operations, as described below. Project Description and Previous Environmental Documentation — From the project description, it appears that this enviromnental analysis is being tiered from the 1993 Elk prepared for the East Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan, as well as a number of subsequent tiered IS/MND's for the East Dublin planning area. It is not clear, however, that the previous environmental documents planned for and analyzed th.e proposed sports park, because the references in the prior analysers were for a "community" park, and not a "sports" park (see paragraph 1 and 2, page 7 of IS/WEND). If the proposed sports park is indeed the previously analyzed community park, please provide additional discussion indicating how the connection from "community" park to "sports" park was determined appropriate to enable CEQA tiering (e.g., the description, intended uses, and acreage range standards for community parks are consistent with and appropriate for the proposed sports park). Aesthetics — Section I, Aesthetics, response "d," indicates that lighting sources utilized at the sports park will create new light and glare impacts for the surrounding single-family residential areas. This response, however, neglects to acknowledge that the project site located under the FAA established traffic pattern for, aircraft utilizing the primary runway (25R-7L) at the Livermore Airport, and that any new lighting source added to the project site could potentially create lighting and glare impacts for pilots. This impact could create a new hazard for pilots, and, as such, it is discussed further under the following Hazards comment section. I tot Hazards — Section VII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, response "e, f' indicates that there are no anticipated impacts related to aircraft noise and crash zone hazards, The project site, however, is located under the FAA established traffic pattern for the primary runway (25R-7L) at the Livermore Airport, indicating that the site will be frequently over -flown by aircraft. Secondly, this hazards response indicates that in 1999, the ALUC had no jurisdiction over land uses within the project site, Since that time, however, the ALLTC airport influence area boundary has expanded, and now encompasses the southern half of the project sith, indicating that the ALLTC now has jurisdiction over land uses within the project. Finally, Livermore requests that additional mitigation be incorporated into the IS/MIND that will ensure that all lighting sources utilized at the sports park are designed to direct light downward so as .to prevent upward spill- over or create glare into the FAA designated aircraft traffic pattern. Livermore requests that this IS/MND response be amended to disclose the potential of these aircraft related conflicts, and to add additional mitigation to control lighting source impacts from the project on pilots. Noise — Section XI, Noise, response "e, f' indicates that the project is not located within two - miles of a public airport, finding that project would not expose people in the project area to excessive noise levels. This response is incorrect because the western boundary of the Livermore Airport is located (.83)-mile from the project site, and the western end of the primary runway is located 1,52-miles from the project site, Additionally, as discussed under the hazards comment, the project site is located under the FAA designated aircraft traffic pattern for the primary runway, and, as such, will be frequently over -flown by aircraft, therefore exposing sports parks users to some amount of aircraft noise. During consideration of the draft Airport Master Plan Update in 2004, Livermore received 21 letters from Dublin residents indicating that aircraft operations were problematic for their business and residential activities, as well as two letters from the City of Dublin echoing these same concerns (attached). Livermore requests that this response be amended to disclose the potential for sports park users to be exposed to aircraft noise. Once again, Livermore appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Livermore requests that Dublin respond to our concerns with this project, and indicate how these concerns will be incorporated into the project's design, use, and operation. Please contact me, or Principal Planner Susan. Frost, at 925-960-4450, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jennifer Craven Associate Planner cc: Marc Roberts, Community Development Director Eric Brown, Planning Manager Leander Hauri, Airport Manager Susan Frost, Principal Planner CITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza, Dibr, C$Ilfornia 9456B January 6, 2005 Leander Hauri, Airport Manager Livermore Municipal Airport 636 Terminal Circle Livermore, CA 94551-9609 Wabsite: http://www,cl,dublin.ca,us R 4c:EIVED JAN 1 0 200( LIVERMORE AIRPORT Re: Livermore Airport Master Plan Advisory Committee Item for January 31, 2005 Dear Mr. Hauri: I have appreciated the opportunity to participate in the Livermore Airport MasterTlan Advisory Committee (Advisory Committee), as the City of Dublin City Council Representative..The Advisory Committee has developed recommendations for the Draft Livermore Airport 2004 Master Plan Update (2004 Update) and the project's Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Negative.Declaration), prepared in conformance with State of California law. I am writing to express my concern that many of the important issues raised by myself and by earlier- coiTespondence from the City of Dublin hoe not addressed by the Advisory Committee's recommendations. I believe that the following issues should be addressed in the revisions to the Airport Master Plan and in future environmental documentation, which should be in the faun. of ui Environmental.Impact Report (EIR) consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and provisions: Proiect Site • The Negative Declaration does not discuss existing or approved noise sensitive uses within the City of Dublin that are located in close proximity to the Airport. This information should be used, in the documents, such as in the Airspace Plan,. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan .Amendment and the subsequent implementing approvals have been consistent with AMC policies regarding the Airport and specifically recognized the existing Airport Protection Area. Likewise, existing and approved development within the. City of Dublin should be recognized in the Airport, Master Plan and the resulting effects should be addressed. Aircraft Mix • The changes in aircraft mix that will result from the proposed changes to hangar space, runway design (length and pavement strength), and Airport. Business Plan will create noise impacts that have not been adequately addressed in the previous Negative Declaration. The changes to hangars will. .accommodate larger and noisier aircraft and these additional impacts should be studied and mitigated in the environmental documentation under CEQA. Under a "Reduced Project" scenario, typically found in the Alternatives section of an EIR, the Livermore Municipal Airport would have an opportunity to review the Airport's goals and impacts without the changes brought about by the proposed new hangars, new runway design, and new leaseholds. Fliht Patterns and Apnroach Patterns Insufficient information is provided in the 2004 Update on the a.sropelland take:off patterns and flightths. I am concerned that the ±light paths and flight patterns resulting from changes it the Livermore Municipal Airport will permit the flight of larger and noisier aircraft above the eastern Dublin community. Area Code (925) • City Manager 833-8650 • City Council 83S-6850 • Personnel 833-8605 Economic Development 833-6550 Finance 833-630 • Public WorksiEnginsering 833-6330 • Parks & Community SerYloas 333-8645 • PWice 833-6870 Planning/Code Enforcement as-asio - Building inspection 833-6620 • Firs Prevention Bureau 833-6806 Printed QJ Recycled Paper iD ▪ INToise The Livermore General Plan EIR stated that over flights contribute little to ambient noise levels in Livermore, However, the General Plan Erk did not assume a shift in aircraft mix resulting from the proposed changes to the Airport as a result of the 2004 Update project or assume that planes operate as low as 700 feet above existing and planned residential uses in the eastern Dublin area. At this distance, over flights do have the potential to increase noise impacts to residences located within these flight paths. Additionally, the General Plan EIR and Mitigated Negative Declaration do not include any discussion of single noise events from aircraft flyovers to sensitive receptors located in Dublin. Further analysis and disclosure of existing and potential impacts are needed to provide full disclosure of the potential adverse impacts of the 2004 Update project. • Airport Business Plan The Airport Business Plan attached to the Master Plan Update recommends that a b4fer,be created .5 to I mile beyond the Airport Protection Area due to perceived conflicts with residential, uses., These conflicts should be fully disclosed and identified in greater detail to adequately address the project ilirpacts. . Operational Limits . • I Without operational linaits and noise 1:3offering, as required for new uses inthe Livermore General Plan (Policy ,1\11. /P4), the imnaetts of the airport have not been adequately preclicted,ot cOntrolled. ' For:example, the proposed runway lights would increase nighttime aircraft Operations, 3,111Jess, . operational controls such as restrictions on flight times during the night and restrictions on the number. of aircraft operations were implemented. Although the airport is not a new use, the proposed changes in operations activity would change the RAJA classification of the airport, resulting iri.a new type ofairpott use and increased intensity at the site. ▪ Forecasts Lastly, the Master Plan 2004 Update's stated intent is to accommodate the forecasts ,for growth in . aircraft operations. It is essential that the operations forecast ts.ed in the 2004 Update (376,000 operations annually by the year 2020) be accompanied by supporting data, such as the sources- of the forecast's conclusions. I believe that the 2004 Update has not established the basis for, or need for, the Livermore Airport's expansion I urge the Livermore City Council to work with its neighboring cornmunities to resolve these important issues for the mutual benefit of the Livermore Municipal Airport and all of the businesses and residents in the Tri-Valley Region. Sincerely, George City of D lin Viotz ayor cc: , Members of the Dublin City Council Richard C. Ambrose, City Manager Eddie Peabody, Jr., Community Development Director ITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 94568 April 7, 2004 Ms. Jennifer Craven, Associate Planner City of Livermore Planning Division 1052 S. Livermore Avenue Livermore, CA 94550-4899 WebsIte: http://vvww,ci.dublin,ce.us RECEIVED APR - B ZUO4 PLANNING DIVISION Re: Review of the Livermore Municipal Airport 2004 Master Plan Update and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Dear Ms. Craven: The City Of Dublin appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the City of Livermore Municipal Airport 2004 Master Plan Update (hereafter "Master Plan" and "Mitigated Negative Declaration") The City recognizes the importance the Livermore Airport provides to the local community, however as an adjacent, jurisdiction, the City of Dublin is concerned about the potentially significant impacts of the proposed project from associated noise impacts from the Airport. Specifically, the City is concerned that the expanded airport operation will result in additional noise impacts to the existing and planned residential uses located within Eastern Dublin. In the past, the City has received complaints from Eastern Dublin residents regarding flight activities from existing operation of the Livermore Airport. Dublin is concerned that the scope and content of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is not adequate. The City's comments are .5-LitritnaTiZed MOW: Project Size The Mitigated Negative Declaration does not mention uses within the City of Dublin as a.djacent to the project site. The Mitigated Negative. Declaration does not discuss existing or approved noise sensitive uses within the City of Dublin that are located in close proximity to the Air -port. The City of Dublin is located less than '4 mile away from the 7L-25R Runway and the General Plan shows residential land uses that are located less than 1 mile from the existing Runway. Additionally, existing single-family residential land uses are located approximately 1.8 miles away from the existing Runway. Additionally, the Master Plan should recognize existing development approval within adjacent cities. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment and the subsequent . implementing approvals (i.e. prezoning and annexation) were consistent with the ALUC policies regarding the Airport and specifically recognized the existing Airport Protection Area. surrounding the Airport. Likewise the Master Plan should recognize existing and approved development within the City of Dublin. Area Code (925) • City manager 833-65o • City Council 833-5550 - Personnel 833-5t305 • Economic Development 953-f3650 Finance 533-1:3640 • Putft Works/Engineenng B33-65aP Parks S Community Services 833•6645 • Police s53-9e70 Panning/Cods Entorcemeni 52-66.10 uiiding Inspection 823-9620 • Fire Prevention Bureau 833-006 printed on Recycled Paper 1110, The Map contained in the Master Plan, labeled Airspace Plan, is inadequate in that it utilizes an out .of date USGS base map and does not show current or approved land uses or nearby jurisdictional lines. The City would be happy to share the most current data in our GIS library to facilitate the preparation of a new map. Protect Descrintioll The project description states the plan does not encourage increased operations, however changes to airport including runway lengthening and strengthening, new taxiway, and additional banger space will result in increased utilization of the Airport. The Project Description section on page 7 includes the statement that "implementation of the plan does not encourage increased operations." This statement is contradicted by a statement in the Master Plan, fou-nd on page 2-9, which, reads: "The availability of reasonably priced hangar units will largely govern the amount of increase in single -engine aircraft based at the airport. Hangar availability will also shape the growth in other aircraft types. ...Growth in multi -engine aircraft (i.e. both piston and jet) will also be affected by the ability of commercial leaseholds." According to the Master Plan the aircraft mix is projected to change significantly in the future. The proposed modifications to the Airport will facilitate these changes to the aircraft mix, which will in turn result in a higher percentage of larger and noisier aircraft utilizing the Airport. The table below is from the Master Plan, which demonstrates that the largest percentage increase in aircraft type occurs in the twin -engine and small business jet aircraft. These planes tend to produce the highest levels of noise. Without the proposed changes to the Airport, the increased utilization of these types of aircraft could not be accommodated. The change in aircraft mix would result in additional noise impacts, which were not addressed or studied, nor mitigation measures iden ti tied. Aircraft type Single Engine Fixed Single Engine Variable Tvvin-Engine Piston Twin -Engine Turbo Prop Small Fan Jet Med Fan Jet Large Fanjet Small Turbojet Large Turbo Fan Helicopters total scurce:Livonnorc Muoicipal Airport viation Activity 2001 Protected 149,980 55,000 45,000 3,800 1,100 800 100 200 20 1,500 257,500 mastor plan Update March 2004 Activity 2020 171,500 g0,000 80,000 8,000 10,000 7,500 1,000 % increase .2020 v. 2001 14.3% 63.6% 77.8% 110.5% 809.1% 837.5% 900.0%. 2,000 33.3% 370,000 43. 7% Flight Patterns and ADvroach Patterns Insufficient infoknaation is provided in the Master Plan Update on the approach and take -off patterns and flight paths. The City is concerned that the flight paths and flight patterns will regularly place larger and noisier aircraft above sensitive receptors within the Eastern Dublin Area. 11) Noise The Mitigated Negative Declaration does not contain an adequate discussion or analysis on potential noise impacts. Aircraft noise around airports consists of a series of single -events from individual aircraft flyovers. The methodology utilized in the Mitigated Negative Declaration was an average of noise levels (CNEL). This methodology does not quantify the maximum instantaneous noise levels (Lmax) from individual aircraft flybys, therefore the utilization of CNEL alone can make it difficult for the public -and decision makers to fully evaluate noise effects, The Livermore General Plan EIR stated that over flights contribute little to ambient noise levels in Livermore. However, according to information from the Airport Manager, aircraft operate as low as 700 feet above existing and planned residential uses within Eastern Dublin. At this distance, •over flights do have the potential to increase noise impacts to residences located within flight paths. Additionally, the General Plan EIR and Mitigated Negative Declaration do not include any discussion of single noise events from aircraft flyovers to sensitive receptors located in Dublin. The General Plan EIR projected an additional 113,000-flight increase from 2000. to 2020. However, the General Plan EIR did not assume a shift in aircraft mix resulting from the proposed changes to the Airport. As a result of this shift, larger aircrafts would be introduced and additional potential noise impacts -would result that were not studied and mitigation measures were not identified in either the Livermore General Plan EIR or the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Therefore the sole reliance upon Mitigation Measure Noise GP-2 to fully mitigate noise impacts is inappropriate given the prOgrammaticnature of the Livermore General Plan EIR andthe proposed changes to the Airport as a result of the Master Plan update. • . The Airport Business Flan The Airport Business Plan attached to thc Master Plan Update suggests that a buffer be created .5 to 1 mile beyond the Airport Protection Area due to conflicts with residential uses, Please clarify if it is intended to extend this buffer beyond jurisdictional lines, into nearby cities. Operational 1,-171itS The Draft City of Livermore General Plan contains Policy (N-1.1.P4) that the City shall require operational limitations and feasible noise buffering for new uses that generate significant 110150 impacts near sensitive uses. Although the airport is not a new use, changes in operations activity would change the FAA classification of the airport, the Airport Reference Code, The City of Dublin is concerned that without specific operational limitations, the impacts of the airport expansion cannot be adequately predicted or controlled. Thank you again for the opportunity to provide these comments. The City of Dublin looks forward to working with Livermore represeratives to craft appropriate mitigation measures that ensure the impacts from the proposed expansion of the Airport are fully mitigated. The City respectfully requests that this Mitigated Negative Declaration not be adopted until such time that adequate mitigation measures can be identified that fully mitigates the impacts resulting from the Master Plan inip I eill en t ati The City believes that cooperation between Livermore and Dublin on this issue can result in a solution that is beneficial to the citizens of both communities. Should you need clarification on any of the comments provided in this letter, please feel free to contact Ms. Jeri Ram, Dublin Planning Manager, at 925-833-6610. Sincerely, /r Eddie Peabody Jr. AICP Community Development Director cc: Mayor and City Council Richard Ambrose City Manager Jeri Ram, Planning Manager Melissa Morton, Public Works Director • ROSEN GOLDBERG &DER Consultants in Acoustics 31 March 2004 Pierce Macdonald City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Subject: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Livermore Municipal Airport Master Plan RGD Project #: 04-012-1 Dear Pierce: We have completed our review of the noise impacts that were identified in the initial study/mitigated negative declaration (IS/MND) for the Livermore Municipal Airport. In summary, we found three areas that need additional analysis to allow a reader to acquire a complete understanding of the project's impacts. They are: 1. Increase in ambient noise due to project — The IS/MND does not providean analysis of the change in aircraft noise levels that would occur as a result of the project implementation. 2. Sinale event noise levels — The IS/MND does not discus e single event noise levels from individual plane flyovers. The California Division of Aeronautics and a recent court decision both identify the need to discuss single event noise and potential effects. 3. Outdoor noise levels in excess of City standards — The IS/MND states that existing residences east of the airport will be exposed to a potentially significant impact since outdoor noise levels will be in excess of a CNEL of 60 dBA, the City's normally acceptable noise level, Air-conditioning is proposed to mitigate the impact by allowing windows to remain closed. Is the impact mitigated if outdoor levels remain over 60 dBA? Discussion The IS/MND identifies impacts that are associated with the implementation of the master plan. Impacts associated with the plan are primarily based on the findings of the EIR on the Livermore General Plan Update. The noise related sections of the following documents were consulted during our review: 1100 Larkspur Landing Circle #254 Larkspur CA 94939 Tel 415 464 0150 Fax 415 464 0155 Pierce Macdonald 31 March 2004 Page 2 110 • Livermore Municipal Airport Master Plan Update, Public Review Draft, March 2004 • Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Livermore Municipal Airport Draft Master Plan, February 2004 • City of Livermore General Plan 2003 — 2025 ▪ The Draft/Final EIR on the City of Livermore General Plan (except Appendix F Noise) ▪ Noise Impact Analysis, Livermore Airport, Livermore California, Prepared by LSA Associates, June 2002 1. NO "INCFMASE IN NOISE" DISCUSSION Page 51 of the IS/MND, section XI(c) addresses increase in ambient noise levels. The IS/MND states that the implementation of the Airport Master Plan Update would , not lead to any greater or different noise impacts related to substantial permanent increases in ambient noise levels than those identified in the 2003 EIR for the General Plan Update and refers the reader to pages 165 to 174 in Volume II of the 2003 EIR. According to the 2003 EIR, a project would have significant noise impact if the project wouid increase noise levels by over 4 dBA above existing levels without the project. The increase in noise from the airport, however, is not assessed with respect to this . standard, instead it is assessed only with respect to the City of Livermore's standard for outdoor noise, a CNEL of 60 dBA. This approach ignores the guidance of the State of California's Airport Land Use Planning Handbcok1 which states that, "... consideration needs to he given to not just the absolute level of noise, but also the amount of noise increase resulting from the project." Examination of the existing and future airport noise contours indicates that areas near the airport would experience increases in aircraft noise of up to 5 dBA. An analysis of noise increases should be conducted for the noise sensitive areas in the airport vicinity including those in the City of Dublin. 2, NO SINGLE EVENT NOISE LEVEL DISCUSSION Aircraft noise around airports consists of a series of single events from individual aircraft flyovers. Federal and State regulations require that the noise exposure from airports be quantified in terms of cumulative (or average) noise level descriptors such as CNEL or Ldn. These descriptors, however, do riot quantify the maximum instantaneous noise levels (1_) from individual aircraft flybys and, therefore, can make it difficult for the public and decision makers to fully evaluate noise effects. 1 "California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook," State of California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics, January 2002, prepared by Shutt Moen Associates, page 7-40. Pierce Macdonald 31 March 2004 Page 3 Litigation over an E1R on the Airport Development Plan at the Oakland International Airport resulted in a recent court decision that required a supplemental E1R addressing single event noise levels. Simila,rly, the State of California recognizes the limitation of the CNEL metric and suggests the use of other noise metrics such as Lax as is evidenced by the following excerpt from the State's Airport Land Use Planning Handbook. . 'A final consideration with respect to reviews of airport development proposals is that the issue involves not only a matter of policy (how much noise is acceptable?), but also, as previously noted, communication of the information in a form that the general public can comprehend, Consequently environmental impact documents prepared for airport - related projects may need to make use of supplemental noise metrics to explain the impacts even though the determination of significance relies upon criteria related to cumulative noise metrics."2 The inclusion of information regarding single event noise and flight tracks would help the public understand the effects of the project and allow adjacent communities to adopt appropriate land uses and planning policies. Disclosure of flight tracks and a discussion of single event noise levels and their effects could reduce the potential for . future noise complaints. 3. MITIGATION OF. Qui-Doorz NOISE • The IS/WIND refers to page 173 of the 2003 E1R which has the sole impatt statement regarding aircraft noise (NOISE GP-2).3 It identifies that homes, east of the airport, will be exposed to a CNEL greater than 60 dBA, a significant impact. The adopted mitigation measure requires that the City purchase and installing air conditioning units for the affected residences so that their windows can be closed when it would otherwise be too hot to do so. Although the EIR states that this mitigation measure will reduce the impact to a less then significant level, the air conditioning will not improve the noise environment in the backyards of the homes. The backyards would still have a CNEL which is greater than the "normally acceptable" noise level of 60 dBA for residential land use (General Plan Table 9-7), The Negative Declaration should explain how the installation of air conditioning will fully mitigate the significant noise impact. 2 Same as footnote 1, 3 Livermore Draft General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report Public Review Draft, Volume June 2003, page 174 Pierce Macdonald 31 March 2004 Page 4 11 1 This concludes our current comments, Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, Alan Rosen Principal Rosen Goldberg & Der, Inc, comirteni 31 oiart)4,(Ipc Fallon '} pi its Park Phase II INITIAL STUDYI CEQA ADDENDUM Lead Agency: City of Dublin Prepared By: Jerry Haag, Urban Planner February 7, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Applicant 2 Project Location and Context 3 Prior Environmental Documents 3 Project Description 5 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 15 Deteiiznination 15 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 17 Attachment to Initial Study 30 1. Aesthetics 30 2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources 32 3. Air Quality 33 4. Biological Resources 35 5. Cultural Resources 37 6. Geology and Soils 39 7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 41 8. Hydrology and Water Quality 42 9. Land Use and Planning 44 10. Mineral Resources 46 11. Noise 46 12. Population and Housing 47 13. Public Services 49 14. Recreation 49 15. Transportation/Traffic 51 16. Utilities and Service Systems 52 17. Mandatory Findings of Significance 54 Initial Study Preparers 57 Agencies and Organizations Consulted 57 References 57 City of Dublin Environmental Checklist/ Initial Study Introduction This Initial Study has been prepared in accord with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and assesses the potential environmental impacts of approving and implementing Phase II (the Lower Terrace) of the Fallon Sports Park located in Eastern Dublin. The Initial Study consists of a completed environmental checklist and a brief explanation of the environmental topics addressed in the checklist. Because the proposed project is generally based on the land use designations, circulation patterns etc. assigned to the project by the City of Dublin General Plan, the Initial Study relies on a Program EIR certified by the City in 1993 for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan (the "Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Environmental'impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 91103064). That EIR, also known in this Initial Study as the "Eastern Dublin EIR," evaluated the following impacts: Land Use, Population, Employment and Housing, Traffic and Circulation, Community Services and Facilities, Sewer, Water and Storm Drainage, Soils, Geology and Seismicity, Biological Resources, Visual Resources, Cultural Resources, Noise, Air Quality and Fiscal Considerations. In 2005, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-05 that approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan. This will be referred to as the "2005 MND." The 2005 MND analyzed the environmental impacts of approving a Master Plan for the development of the Fallon Sports Park, located on the northwest corner of Fallon Road and Central Parkway and constructing recreational improvements envisioned in the Master Plan. The subject of this Initial Study is a proposed change to the Master Plan to install night lighting on one sports field located on the northeast corner of Central Parkway and Lockhart Street that was not previously considered for night lighting and to relocate an existing City preschool center from Emerald Glen Park to Fallon Sports Park for approximately five years. Applicant: City of Dublin Parks and Community Services Department 100 Civic Plaza Dublin CA City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 2 February 2014 Attn: Rosemary Alex Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator (925) 833-6646 Project Location and Context Fallon Sports Park consists of approximately 60 acres of land devoted to a range of active sports recreational uses, including baseball and softball diamonds, soccer fields, basketball and tennis courts. Other uses include group picnic areas, play areas, sports paths, restroorns and vehicle parking lots. Phase 1 improvements, encompassing approximately 27 acres of land, was completed in 2010 and is open for public use. Two additional phases, generally located in the north, east and south, remain to be constructed. This Initial Study addresses improvements in Phase II, also known as the "Lower Terrace." A Master Plan for the entire 60-acre Fallon Sports Park was approved by the City of Dublin in June 2006. The park is located on the northwest corner of Fallon Road and Central Parkway in the Eastern Extended Planning area of the City of Dublin as identified in the Dublin General Plan. It is generally located along the west side of Fallon Road, north of Central Parkway and approximately one-half mile north of the 1-580 freeway. Exhibit 1 shows the regional location of the City of Dublin. Exhibit 2 shows the location of Fallon Sports Park in relation to surrounding features in Eastern Dublin. Exhibit 3 depicts the Lower Terrace area, the focus of this Initial Study, as well as the location of proposed site improvements (discussed below), Existing land uses adjacent to the project site includes residential development and a fire station north of the park, residential development and undeveloped land to the east, residential development to the west and undeveloped land to the south. Prior Environmental Review Documents The project has been included in two previous CEQA documents, as noted below: Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (State Clearinghouse #91103064). A Program Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment (Eastern Extended Planning Area) and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) was certified by the City Council in 1993 by Resolution No. 51-93. This document and its related Addenda collectively are referred to as the "Eastern Dublin EIR" or "EDEIR." It evaluated the following impacts: Land Use; Population, Employment and Housing; Traffic and Circulation; Community Services and Facilities; Sewer, Water and Storm Drainage; Soils, Geology and Seismicity; Biological Resources; Visual Resources; Cultural Resources; Noise; Air Quality; and Fiscal Considerations. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 3 February 2014 The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Resolution No. 53-93) for the following impacts: Cumulative loss of agriculture and open space land, cumulative traffic, extension of certain community facilities (natural gas, electric and telephone service), consumption of non-renewable natural resources, increases in energy uses through increased water treatment and disposal and through operation of the water distribution system, inducement of substantial growth and concentration of population, earthquake ground shaking, loss or degradation of botanically sensitive habitat, regional air quality, noise and alteration of visual character. The Eastern Dublin EIR was challenged in court and was found to be legally adequate. Fallon Snorts Park Master Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration (2005 MND) A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to analyze the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan in 2005. The MND was approved by City Council Resolution No. 89-05 on May 15, 2005. The MND assumed development of the park consistent with the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan. A number of mitigation measures were included in the adopted MND in the attachment to the Initial Study. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 4 February 2014 Project Description The proposed project includes approving and developing the Lower Terrace of the Park. Overall improvements envisioned for this phase include but are not limited to: • Constructing an on -site entry road at the existing curb cut along the north side of Central Parkway; • Building an approximately 145-space vehicle parking lot. • Constructing a combination restroom and concession building. • Extending existing on -site pedestrian pathways from the existing park. • Constructing a 90' lighted baseball field. • Construction of a 2,000 square foot building for public use, including but not limited to community meetings, rentals, etc.) • Constructing two synthetic turf lighted soccer fields plus a warm up area. • Extending utility lines. • Temporarily relocating a City preschool center for a five-year period. • Related improvements, such as site grading and water quality features, to facilitate the above improvements. Details regarding the proposed field lighting and temporary preschool center relocation are discussed below. Field Lighting. The City of Dublin is proposing to install up to 8 lighting fixtures (still correct number?) adjacent to existing lighted soccer fields similar to existing lights that were constructed as part of the initial phase of the park. The planned athletic fields are located on the southwest corner of Fallon Sports Park. The approximate locations of the light fixtures are shown on Exhibit 4a. An alternative location is shown on Exhibit 4b. Exhibit 5 shows the design of a typical lighting fixture_ Lighting standards (poles) are proposed to be up to 80 feet tall to illuminate soccer and rugby fields. All light fixtures would be 1500-watt metal halide lamps. Lights would only be used when the field is in use up until 10 pm each night and all lights would be turned off at 10:10 p.m. New lights would be sited so as to minimize spill over of unwanted light and glare on adjacent residential areas to the south and west of the park. To achieve this, lights are proposed to be installed using the following criteria to limit spill over of light from the site. • Lights near Lockhart Street shall have a maximum vertical illumination of 0.20 foot-candles at a distance of 260 horizontal distance from the west side of the proposed soccer field. A foot-candle is a unit of illumination equivalent to the light produced from 1 candle at a distance of 1 foot. Prior to using the lights, a photometric analysis will be completed by the City's lighting consultant to confirm this standard is achieved. • Lights near Central Parkway would be limited to a maximum vertical illumination of 0.40 foot-candles at a distance of 260 horizontal feet from the south side of the baseball field. A photometric analysis will also be completed by the City to ensure this lighting standard is achieved. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 Page 5 February 2014 Preschool Relocation. The City proposes to relocate Emerald Glen preschool from its current location in Emerald Glen Park to a portion of the existing (Phase 1) Fallon Sports Park while Emerald Glen Aquatic facility is under construction for up to a 5-year period. Exhibit 6 shows the approximate location of the proposed preschool, which would be immediately north of the existing parking lot in the approximate north central of the park. The preschool enrolls a maximum of 50 students per session with two sessions operated per day. The morning session would begin at approximately 8:45 to 9:15 a.m. and end at 11:00 to 11:45 a.m. The afternoon session would extend from approximately 12.45 to 1:45 p.m. to 3:15 to 3:45 p.m. Each session would have a maximum staff of six staff people at the school would arrive approximately 15 minutes before the start of the session and depart approximately 15 minutes following the close of the session. Proposed preschool facilities include installing modular classrooms totaling 2,300 square feet on a portion of the existing park as described above. Water, wastewater, electrical and other utilities would be extended to the buildings. School staff and visitors would use the existing parking lot. Requested City approvals. The City is proposing to amend the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan to accommodate the proposed project. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 6 February 2014 El,nhraorr i R:rhm kortll d {�cihi oa}Ir:yhU Richman W.. / .; 9r Asuiet _ 3nanc SAN FRANCISCO pekna Hafghe p Ian Amazon Skylawnt�.r Mrfnmral Park SI Ifanllncy•lm Bari: Slay • Ibany Irms sr Berkeley 6Ci�: I.rYmlmpn wremcn C pT OAKLAND Balm San C imareln Hl surkrgh Marray ?; � - rrurl+aI SCilwOp CityS;`r„• Ranh - fax Oak r fast ado y,na -16Y Evpri`, Meafa Perk IeARRylenditNalv._ Ile r rnirip'Fctlre Eeerc p Plrei grimed Regional' Paik RVolr vaii - Ca i8 c.nne wanut I.alayeue Samna klpraga Cmxon Hayward Clapon Cacrle Rack Park Mack Oremnrrd Merles Rrglonar'•: Preserve SAN RAMON ri San Jfarrean Cmuaf Park' Tacmalaa al Morgan yeailory ReglortM park SITE LOCATION a Seater Park A Bhfelrr Cormp x Stentwami Bml°ax Aapk . Fhkl Park g 1 Casho _.._0e." ma.+ DUBLIN ,,,rrk.M, :.-.—a valley \P`a,P1.4, a.... Pn:rvirw . y=aarrar� ", CITY OF DUBLIN FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE II INITIAL STUDY LIVERMORE L 2.11 Cpmmu, r PLEASANTON Peri Park FREMONT to er gumor 2 MILES r—i Exhibit 1 REGIONAL CONTEXT 0 0.5 1 Miles STREAM CORRIDOR SITE LOCATION 0 SCHOOL LEJ FIRE STATION CITY OF DUBLIN FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE II INITIAL STUDY RURAL RESIDENTIAL/ AGRICULTURE LOW -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MED-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IMMED/HIGH-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL "HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL =OPEN SPACE " Ill PUBLIC / SEMI-PUBLIC ®GENERAL COMMERCIAL K ®GENERAL COMMERCIAL / CAMPUS OFFICE CAMPUS OFFICE INDUSTRIAL PARK MIXED USE 2 / CAMPUS OFFICE PARS( HIGHWAY 580 EXIT 48 AT FALLON ROAD Exhibit 2 SITE CONTEXT _..__.e ,^: EXISTING LIGHTED \�; 1_ �� r ;i SOFTBALL FIELD f', EXISTING SYNTHETIC '� . TURF SOCCER FIELDS I ! ',_ . -''—`#4..._�. _.� ems` r• - fi f 90' BASEBALL DIAMOND (NATURAL GRASS ONLY) 20 80X12O YARD LIGHTED SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FIELD 0 65X100 YARD LIGHTED SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FIELD 0 RESTROOM / CONCESSION BUILDING LEI RECREATION BUILDING CITY OF DUBLIN FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE iI INITIAL STUDY a 1 � D it as 250' APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF WORK 0 LIGHTED BOCCE COURTS (4) 0 ADVENTURE PLAY AREA 9 GROUP PICNIC AREA 0 ENTRY ROAD AND PARKING (-145 CARS) Exhibit 3 PROPOSED LOWER TERRACE IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING LIGHTED SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER ;FIELDS 1 \jj { L urpr f — V,1 � O�v 0 SPORTS POLE LIGHT APPROXIMATE LOCATION ❑ LIGHTED BOCCE BALL COURTS CITY OF DUBLIN FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE II EXISTING LIGHTED , K SOFTBALL FIELD .%f r __---�� r AEI I i \j/ ji ?Os N Exhibit 4 LOCATION OF FIELD LIGHTING INITIAL STUDY E EEIJDED GLARE CONTROL VISORS BP15-1 ADJACENT PAVEMENT PULL BOX r CONCRETE PAD POLETOP LUMINAIRE / A3 REBAR ASSEMBLY 4.1 ' `-- 3" - I — CAISSON PRECAST 30' , CL CONCRETE BASE f 1 LP---1i— WIRE HARNESS — i*WI ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS — ENCLOSURE -Moms -PANG - PRMANY WICHIG LUGS - GTE CISCONEGI PEN racwi PER LIGHT-SIGUICRJRE 2" MEN - GROUNDING LUG GALVANI7ED STEEL POLE reir PULL BOX V 1 4' LONG PRECAST CONCRETE BASE CENTRIFUGALLY SPUN. PRESTRESSED SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER FOR DESIGN OF CONCRETE BASE CITY OF DUBLIN FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE II INITIAL STUDY 27 1 /2" --- TOP VIEW 0 PULL BOX #3 REBAR- Gnk flLL 9AGKFIC JACKING EAR DETAIL 'A' GROUND LEVEL SSD FOR BASE AND REINFORCEMENT DETAILS 30" DTA MIN. 3000 PSI CONCRETE BACKFILL. SSD 15.75' ELEVATION NEW GN LIGHPOLES S3T FIXTURE F3 LIGHT POLE BASE OWBAND 0 :GROUND LEVEL DETAIL 'A' SCALE: NTS ARE MINIMUM REQUIRED CL= 2W-6" ATTACHMENT BR,:.KET 2'-0" CUSTOMER/CONTRACTOR SUPPLIES: '. - GROUNDING ROO AND CONNECTION is TO SYSTEM GROUNDING LUG - CONCRETE BACKFIU. - UNDERGROUND WIRING - SERVICE ENTRANCE PRECAST BASE `'KNUCKLE -F3 ON POLES SI & S2 --CL �-- BRACKET WIRE ACCESS HUB HANDHOLE WITH GROUNDING LUG ACCESS INTEGRATED POLE GROUNDING FITTINGS — LIFTING BAR HOLE SIDE VIEW ABOVE GROUND ACCESS HOLE UNDERGROUND ACCESS HOLE Exhibit 5 INTEGRATED GROUNDING ELECTRODE TYPICAL LIGHT FIXTURE CITY OF DUBLIN FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE II INITIAL STUDY 1. Project description: 2. Lead agency: 3. Contact persons: Approval of Phase II improvements to the existing Fallon Sports Park, would include lighted baseball field, two lighted soccer fields, a temporarily relocated preschool, a 2,000 square foot building and other park and recreation improvements. City of Dublin Community Parks & Community Services Department 100 Civic Plaza Dublin CA 94568 Rosemary Alex Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator (925) 833 6646 4. Project location: Fallon Sports Park, northwest corner of Fallon Road and Central Parkway in Eastern Dublin 5. Project sponsor: City of Dublin 6. General Plan designation: Community Park 7. Zoning: PD-Planned Development 8. Other public agency required approvals: • Amendment to City of Dublin Parks and Recreation Master Plan (probable) City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 14 February 2014 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The envirorunental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "potentially significant impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Utilities/Service Systems Agricultural Resources Cultural Resources Hydrology/ Water Quality Noise Recreation Mandatory Findings of Si • nificance - Air Quality - Geology/Soils Land Use/ Planning Population/ Housing - Transportation/ Circulation Determination (to be completed by Lead Agency): On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and the previous Negative Declaration certified for this project by the City of Dublin adequately addresses potential impacts. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Negative Declaration will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on earlier analysis as described on the attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." A Environmental Impact Report is required, but must only analyze the effects that remain to be addressed. X I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be any new or substantially more severe significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects: a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR and MND pursuant to applicable standards; and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR and MND, including revisions or mitigation City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase li Page 15 February 2014 measures that are imposed on the proposed Project, except for those impacts which were identified as significant and unavoidable and for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was previously adopted by the City. An Addendum to the Eastern Dublin Environmental Impact Report and the 2005 Fallon Sports Park Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared. Signature: " 1 � Date: ? ( emAl For: , h ©r 61:4 . t Printed Name: City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 16 February 2014 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "no impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parenthesis following each question. A "no impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "no impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general factors (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less -than -significant with mitigation, or less -than -significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less -than -Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less -than -Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less -than -significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17, "Earlier Analysis, as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier FIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). The checklist will include a response "no new impact" in these circumstances_ In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less -Than -Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase l9 Page 17 February 2014 6) Lead Agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances, etc.). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is a suggested form and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should notinally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each agency should identify the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question and the mitigation measures identified, if any, to reduce the impact to a less than significant level. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 18 February 2014 Environmental Impacts (Note: Source of determination listed in parenthesis. See listing of sources used to determine each potential impact at the end of the checklist) Note: A full discussion of each item is found following the checklist. 1. Aesthetics. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Source: 2,3,5) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Source: 2,3,4) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Source: 2, 5) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Source: 2,4, 6) 2. Agricultural Resources Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to a non- agricultural use? (Source: 2, 3, 5) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Source: 1,2,3) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to a non- agricultural use? (Source: 2,3,5) 3. Air Quality (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district may be relied on to make the following determinations). Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Source: 2,4) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Source: 2,4) City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Less than No New Significant Impact Impact X Page 19 February 2014 c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? (2, 4,6) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Source: 4, 5) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Source: 5, 6) 4. Biological Resources. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?(Source: 2,3,4) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Source: 2,3,4) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other means? (Source: Source: 2,3,4) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Source: 2, 3,4) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree protection ordinances? (Source: 1, 2, 4) City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Potentially Less Than Less than Significant Significant Significant Impact With Impact Mitigation No New Impact Page 20 February 2014 f) Conflict with the provision of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? (Source: 1,2) 5. Cultural Resources. Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse impact in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Sec. 15064.5? (Source: 2,4,5) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to Sec, 15064.5 (Source: 2,4,5) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource, site or unique geologic feature? (Source: 2,3,5) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of a formal cemetery'? (4) 6. Geology and Soils. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault (Source: 2, 4) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking (2, 6) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (2, 4) iv) Landslides? (2, 4) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Source: 2,4,5 ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on - or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or similar hazards (Source: 2, 4) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (Source: 2,4) Potentially Less Than Less than No New Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II X Page 2f February 2014 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? (Source: 2,4) 7. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials (Source: 2, 4, 5) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Source: 2, 4, 5) c) Emit hazardous ernissions or handle hazardous materials or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Source: 2, 3, 4) d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Sec. 65962,5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Source: 6) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of a public airport of public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project arca? (Source: 2, 3) f) For a project within the vicinity of private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Source: 2, 4) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with the adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Source: 2, 6) City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase it Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Less than No New Significant Significant Impact With Impact Mitigation Page 22 February 2014 h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Source: 2,45) 8. Hydrology and Water Quality. Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Source: 2,4 ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g. the production rate of existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (2,4) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (Source: 2, 4, 5) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (Source: 2, 4, 5) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Source: 2, 4, 5) f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Source: 2, 4) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? (Source: 4, 6) City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 Potentially Less 'Phan Less than No New Significant Significant Significant impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Page 23 February 2014 h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Source: 4, 6) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, and death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (4) j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or rnudf€ow? (5) 9. Land Use and Planning. Would th.e project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Source: 1) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Source: 1, 2,3,6) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (1,2,3,6) 10. Mineral Resources. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Source: 1, 2, 4) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general Plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Source:1, 2, 4) l 1. Noise. Would the proposal result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (2,4) b) Exposure of persons or to generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Source: 2, 4) c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above existing levels without the project? (2, 4, 5) City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Potentially Less Than Less than No New Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Page 24 February 2014 d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (2,4, 5) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working n the project area to excessive noise levels? (2, 4, 5) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Source: 2, 4, 5) 12. Population and Housing. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Source: 2, 4, 5) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (4, 5) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement of housing elsewhere? (Source: 4, ) 13. Public Services. Would the proposal: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? (Sources: 2, 6) Fire protection Police protection Schools Parks Other public facilities Solid Waste City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 Potentially Less Than Less than No New Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation x x Page 25 February 2014 14. Recreation: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated (Source: 2, 4, 5) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Source: 2, 4, 5) 15. Transportation and Traffic. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e, result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads or congestion at intersections)? (2, 4, 5) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways? (4,5) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (4, 5) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses, such as farm equipment? (5) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (5) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (5) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (such as bus turnouts and bicycle facilities) (1,2,4) City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon. Sports Park/Phase i€ Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Less than No New Signifi cant S i gnificant 1 mpact With Impact Mitigation x Page 26 February 2014 16. Utilities and Service Systems. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (4, 5) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (4, 5 ) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (4, 5) d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing water entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (5) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? (5) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (5) g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (5) 17. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? City of Dublin InitiaE Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Less than Significant Significant With Impact Mitigation No New Impact Page 27 February 2014 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Less than No New Significant Significant Impact With Impact Mitigation Sources used to determine potential environmental impacts 1. Eastern General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan 2. Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan EIR 3 2005 Fallon Sports Park Mitigated Negative Declaration 4. Discussion with City staff or service provider 5. Site Visit 6. Other Source X XVII. Earlier Analyses a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. Portions of the environmental setting, project impacts and mitigation measures for this Initial Study refer to environmental information contained in the 1993 Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No_ 91103064), hereinafter referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR or EDEIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR is a Program EIR which was prepared for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and. Specific Plan of which this Project is a part. It was certified by the Dublin City Council on May 10, 1993. Following certification of the FIR, the Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for impacts including but not limited to: cumulative traffic, extension of certain community facilities (natural gas, electric and telephone service), regional air quality, noise and visual. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a large number of mitigation measures which apply to this project and which would be applied to any development within the project area. Specific mitigation measures identified in the certified Eastern Dublin EIR for potential impacts are referenced in the text of this Initial Study. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 28 February 2014 This Initial Study also relies on the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted in 2005, previously cited, that analyzed the impacts of approving the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan and constructing the park. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and 15163, this Initial Study is intended to identify the potential for any new or substantially increased significant impacts on or of the project which were not evaluated in the Eastern Dublin EIR or the 2005 WIND for the park and which would require additional environmental review. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 29 February 2014 Attachment to Initial Study Discussion of Checklist 1. Aesthetics Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures to reduce anticipated visual resource impacts from the General Plan and EDSP project. These include: • Mitigation Measure 3.8/1.0 reduced project impacts related to standardized tract development (IM 3.8 /B) to a less -than -significant level. This mitigation requires future developers to establish visually distinct communities which preserves the character of the natural landscape by protecting key visual elements and maintaining views from major travel corridors. • Mitigation Measure 3.8 / 2.0 reduced the impact of converting the rural and open space character of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan area (IM 3.8/B) but not to a Less -than -significant level. The mitigation measure requires implementation of the land use plan that emphasizes retention of predominant natural features. Even with adherence to this measure, IM 3.8/B would remain significant and unavoidable on both a project and cumulative level. • Mitigation Measure 3.8/ 3.0 would reduce the impact of obscuring distinctive natural features of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan area (IM 3.8 / C) but not to a less -than -significant level. The mitigation measure requires implementation of the land use plan that emphasizes retention of predominant natural features. • Mitigation Measures 3.8/4.0-4.5 reduced the impact of altering the visual quality of hillsides (IM 3.8/D) to a Tess -than -significant level. These mitigation measures require implemtation of appropriate Eastern Dublin Specific Plan policies including but not limited to use of sensitive grading design to minimize grading, use of existing topographic features, limiting use of flat pads for construction, using building designs that conform to natural land forms, recontouring hillside to resemble existing topography and minimizing the height of cut and fill slopes. • Mitigation Measures 3.8 / 5.0-5.2 reduced the impact of altering the visual quality of ridges (IM 3.8 / E) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures limit development on main ridges that border the Specific Plan area to the north and east but are allowed on foreground hills, and would limit development in locations where scenic views would be obscured or would extend above a ridgetop. City of Dublin initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase #I Page 30 February 2014 • Mitigation Measure 3.8/ 6.0 reduced the impact of altering the visual quality of watercourses (1M 3.8/ G) to a less -than -significant level. This mitigation measure protects Tassajara Creek and other stream courses from unnecessary alteration or disturbance, and adjoining development should be sited to maintain visual access to stream corridors. • Mitigation Measures 3.8/7.0 and 7/1 reduced impacts on scenic vistas (IM 3.8/1) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures require protection of designated open space areas and directs the City to conduct a visual survey of the EDSP area to identify and map viewsheds. 2005 M7VD • Mitigation Measure 1 required a photometric study with final construction drawings prior to the issuance of an electrical permit for the installation of any lighting. Lighting "spill -over" shall be kept to a minimum to disturbance and intrusion into residential areas through the use of lower lighting, with light standards for fields and courts designed to minimize Light intrusion into residential areas. The proposed project will be required to adhere to applicable mitigation measures identified above. Project Impacts a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a scenic vista? No New Impact. The Lower Terrace area is located on a downslope area generally facing Central Parkway. Although planned for a major park, the site is vacant and does not contain any existing scenic vistas or public gathering places. Proposed development of an additional phase of the Fallon Sports Park under the auspices of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and Fallon Sports Park Master Plan was analyzed in the 2005 MND. The proposed day care facility would be located within a developed portion of the existing park and there would be limited visibility of school buildings from surrounding streets. No new or more severe impacts are anticipated for the added field lighting and temporary preschool with respect to substantial adverse impacts on a scenic vista. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including state scenic highway? No New Impact. The project site has been rough graded in connection with prior approvals and in anticipation of construction of a public park. The site is located approximately one-half mile north of the 1-580 freeway, a designated scenic highway. No major stands of trees or other similar scenic resources are present on the site that would be significantly impacted. The site for the proposed day care facility has already been graded as part of Phase I improvements for the park. No new or more severe impacts are anticipated with respect to this topic than have been previously analyzed. c) Substantially degrade existing visual character or the quality of the site? No New Impact. The proposed project includes the consideration developing an City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 31 February 2014 additional, second phase of the Fallon Sports Park. Aesthetic impacts would include disturbance of existing vegetation and grading of undeveloped land to create generally flat pads for sports fields, parking areas, walkways and other recreational improvements. This second phase of park development was considered and analyzed in the 2005 MND and no new or more severe impacts are anticipated with approval of the second phase of park development. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? No New Impact. The proposed project would include the installation of sports field lighting as described in the Project Description section of this Initial Study. To ensure that there would be minimal and less - than -significant "spill over" of unwanted light and glare off of the park site, the City will require that field lighting plans and specification conform to a maximum maintained vertical illuminance level for spill light that does not exceed 0.8 foot-candles (FC) (initial 1.1 FC) when treasured 150 feet from edge of the soccer field. Measurements are to be taken facing the lights and at heights that may be of most concern (i.e. 5 feet, 10 feet and 15 feet above grade). The lighting designer shall prepare initial vertical illuminance calculations on the line to establish compliance with 0.8 FC level and indicate maintenance factor used to convert initial values to maintained values. At 200 feet from edge of soccer field spill light design specifications shall not exceed 0.1 FC measured at finished grade level. 2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR identified several potential impacts related to agricultural resources. Impact IM 3.1 /C stated that discontinuation of agricultural uses would be an insignificant impact due to on -going urbanization trends in Dublin and the Tri-Valley area. Impact 3.1 ID identified a loss of lands of Farmlands of Local Importance with approval and implementation of the General Plan and Specific Plan. This was also noted as an insignificant impact. Impact 3.1 / F stated that buildout of Specific Plan land uses would have a significant and unavoidable impact on cumulative loss of agricultural and open space lands. Finally, Impact IM 3.1 / E noted indirect impacts related to non -renewal of Williamson Act contracts. This impact was also identified as an insignificant impact. 2005 MND. No impact to agricultural or forestry resources were identified in this document. Project Impacts a-d) Convert prime farmland to a non-agricultural use or involve other changes which could result in conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use, conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract, result in the loss of forest land use conversion afforest land to a non forest use or involve of other changes that could result in the conversion of forest land to a non forest use? No New Impact. No significant City of Dublin Page 32 Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II February 2014 impacts were identified with respect to agricultural resources in previous CEQA documents listed above. No new conditions have been identified in this Initial Study with respect to conversion of prime farmland or forest land to a non- agricultural or non -forest use and no new or more severe impacts would result than were analyzed in previous CEQA documents for this site. The site is not zoned for agricultural use nor is there a Williamson Act contract in effect on the property, No new or more severe impacts are therefore anticipated than were previously analyzed n the 2005 MND. 3. Air Quality Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures to reduce anticipated air quality impacts from the General Plan and EDSP project. These include: Mitigation Measures 3.11/2.0-4.0 reduced project and cumulative impacts related to vehicle emission from construction equipment (IM 3.11 / B) but not to a less - than -significant level. These mitigations require emission control from on -site equipment, completion of a construction impact reduction plan and others. Even with adherence to these mitigations, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable. • Mitigation Measures 3.11/5.0-11.0 reduced mobile source emission from ROG and NOx (IM 3.11/ C) but not to a Tess -than -significant level. Mitigation measures require coordination of growth with transportation plans and other measures. Many of which are at a policy (not a project) level. Even with adherence to adopted mitigations, IM 3.11 / C would remain significant and unavoidable. • Mitigation Measures 3.11 / 12.0-13.0 reduced project and cumulative impacts related to stationary source emissions (IM 3.11/E) but not to a less -than - significant level. The two adopted mitigations require reduction of stationary source emissions to the extent feasible by use of energy conservation techniques and recycling of solid waste material. Even with adherence to the two measures, stationary source emissions would remain significant and unavoidable. 2005 MND. This document did not identify and significant air quality impacts or mitigation measures. The proposed project will be required to adhere to applicable mitigation measures related to air quality. Project Impacts a) Would the project conflict or obstruct implementation of can air quality plan? No New Impact. Approval and construction of the Phase 11 portion of the Fallon Sports Park would be consistent with growth projections included in the Dublin General City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 33 February 2014 Plan, which is used as the basis of the Regional Clean Air Plan. No new or more severe impacts would occur result with respect to this topic than was previously analyzed. b) Would the project violate any air quality standards? No New Impact. Grading and construction activities associated with Phase II would generate fugitive dust into the environmental, potentially exceeding Bay Area Air Quality Management District air quality standards. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 2 contained in the 2005 MND and other applicable Eastern Dublin EIR air quality mitigation measures will reduce this impact to a less -than -significant level by requiring a number of dust control measures, including frequent watering of graded areas, covering of haul trucks, stabilizing graded areas with non -toxic soil stabilizers, sweeping of paved areas and hydroseeding or stabilizing graded areas. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts would result than have been previously analyzed in other CEQA documents. c) Would the project result in cumulatively considerable air pollutants? No New Impact. The Eastern Dublin EIR found that Mobile Source and Stationary Source air emissions as significant and irreversible impacts. Accordingly, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was approved when the EDSP was approved and the EDSP EIR certified in 1994. The proposed park expansion is not anticipated to generate additional vehicle trips beyond those analyzed in the EDSP FIR and the 2005 MND. Therefore, new or more severe impacts would occur and no additional analysis is required for this topic. d) Expose sensitive receptors to significant pollutant concentrations No New Impact. The same level of park use is anticipated than was anticipated in the 2005 MND in terms of sensitive receptors. Adherence to mitigation measures contained in the 2005 MND and Eastern Dublin EIR reduced impacts to sensitive receptors to a less -than -significant level. No new or more severe impacts have been identified in this Initial Study than were previously analyzed. e} Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No New Impact. Since the proposed project does not include manufacturing or similar uses uses, no significant amounts of objectionable odors would be created. The Eastern Dublin EIR identified this impact as a potentially significant cumulative impact which could not be mitigated to achieve the eight -fold reduction in stationary source emissions needed to meet the less -than -significant threshold and, pursuant to CEQA, the City of Dublin adopted a Statement of Overriding Consideration for this impact. No new impacts are identified in this Initial Study beyond those identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR and other CEQA documents. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 34 February 2014 4. Biological Resources Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures to reduce anticipated impacts to biological resources from the General Plan and EDSP project. These include: • Mitigation Measures 3.7/ 1.0-4.0 reduced impacts related to direct habitat loss (IM 3.7/A) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigations require minimization of direct habitat loss due to development, preparation of vegetation management and enhancement plans and development of a grazing management plan by the City of Dublin. • Mitigation Measure 3.7/5.0 reduced impacts related to indirect loss of vegetation removal (IM 3.7/B) to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure 3.7/5,0 requires revegetation of graded or disturbed areas as quickly as possible. • Mitigation Measures 3.7/6.0-17.0 reduced impacts related to loss or degradation of botanically sensitive habitats (IM 3.7/ C) to a less -than --significant level. These measures require a wide range of steps to be taken by future developers to minimize impacts to sensitive habitat areas, including preserving natural stream corridors, incorporating natural greenbelts and open space into development projects, preparation of individual wetland delineations, preparation of individual erosion and sedimentation plans and similar actions. • Mitigation Measures 3.7/ 18.0-19.0 reduced impacts related to the San Joaquin kit fox (IM 3.7/D) to a less -than -significant level. These measures require consultation with appropriate regulatory agencies regarding the possibility of kit fox on project sites and restrictions on use of pesticides and herbicides. • Mitigation Measures 3,7/20.0-22.0 reduced impacts related to the tri-colored blackbird (IM 3.7/1) to a less -than -significant level. These measures require preconstruction surveys for this species and protection of impacted habitat areas. These measures also apply to burrowing owl and badger species. • Mitigation Measures 3.7/23.0-24.0 reduced impacts related to destruction of Golden Eagle nesting sites (IM 3.7/J) to a less -than -significant level. These measures require preconstruction surveys for this species and protection of impacted habitat areas. • Mitigation Measure 3.7/ 25.0 reduced impacts related to loss of Golden Eagle foraging habitat (IM 3.7/K) to a less -than -significant level. This measure requires the identification of a Golden Eagle protection zone within the Eastern Dublin planning area. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 35 February 2014 • Mitigation Measure 3.7/ 26.0 reduced impacts related to Golden Eagle and other raptor electrocution (IM 3.7/L) to a less -than -significant level. This measure requires undergrounding of electrical transmission facilities. • Mitigation Measure 3.7/ 27.0 reduced impacts related to American badger (IM 3.7/N) to a Less -than -significant level. This measure mandates a minimum buffer of 300 feet around burrowing owl nesting sites and American badger breeding sites during the breeding season. • Mitigation Measure 3.7/ 28.0 reduced impacts related to special status invertebrates (IM 3.7/S) to a less -than --significant level. This measure requires follow-on special surveys for these species during appropriate times of the year. The Eastern Dublin EIR also addresses potential impacts and mitigation measures regarding bald eagle, peregrine falcons, red -legged frog, California tiger salamander, western pond turtle the prairie falcon, northern harrier, black -shouldered kite, sharp - shinned hawk, Cooper's hawk, short -eared owl and California horned lizard. 2005 MND. No significant biological resource impacts were identified in this document. The proposed project will be required to adhere to applicable biological resource mitigation measures contained in the previous CEQA documents prepared for the site. Project Impacts a) Have a substantial adverse impact on a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species? No New Impact. The Eastern Dublin EIS, contains numerous mitigation measures to reduce impacts to candidate, sensitive and special -status species to a less - than significant level. These are listed above. As noted above, the project site was analyzed in multiple previous CEQA documents and the site has been previously disturbed as part of a rough grading plan. Proposed construction of the Phase II portion of Fallon Sports Park will be required to comply with applicable mitigation measures to protect candidate, sensitive and special - status plant and wildlife species. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts with respect to candidate, sensitive or special -status species would occur than have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents. The proposed project would continue to contribute to cumulative loss or degradation of botanically sensitive habitat, which was identified as a significant and unavoidable impact (IM 3.7/C) in the Eastern Dublin EIR. b, c) Have a substantial adverse impact on riparian habitat or federally protected wetlands? No New Impact. Although no wetlands and waters of the United States have been identified on the project site, mitigation measures are included in the Eastern Dublin EIR to reduce such impacts to a less -than -significant level. No new or more severe impacts would occur than have been previously analyzed with respect to this topic. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 36 February 2014 d) Interfere with movement of native fish or wildlife species? No New Impact. Mitigation measures contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR contain mitigation measures that reduced this impact to a less -than -significant level. No new or more severe impacts would occur than have been previously analyzed with respect to potential interference with fish or wildlife movement. e, f) Conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or any adopted Habitat Conservation PIans or Natural Community Conservation Plans? No New Impact. Approval and construction of the proposed project would not affect any trees on the site, since no mature trees are found there. The project site lies within the Eastern Alameda County Conservation Strategy (EACCS) planning area. The City of Dublin utilizes the Conservation Strategy as guidance for environmental permitting for public projects, and private development projects are encouraged to use the EACCS as a resource as well. The Conservation Strategy embodies a regional approach to permitting and mitigation for wildlife habitat impacts associated with land development, infrastructure, and other activities. The Conservation Strategy is neither a Habitat Conservation Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan, but is a document intended to provide guidance during the project planning and permitting process to ensure that impacts are offset in a biologically effective manner. There would therefore be no new or significantly more severe impacts with respect to this topic than previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR 5. Cultural Resources Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures to reduce anticipated impacts to cultural resources from the General Plan and EDSP project. These include: ■ Mitigation Measures 3.9 / 1.0-4.0 reduced impacts related to disruption or destruction of identified prehistoric resources (IM 3.9 / A) to a less -than - significant level. These mitigations mandate a program of mechanical and/or hand subsurface testing for the presence or absence of midden deposits, recordation of identified midden sites, collection and / or testing of resources and development of a site -specific protection program for prehistoric sites. • Mitigation Measures 3.9/5.0-6.0 reduced impacts related to the disruption or destruction of unrecorded prehistoric resources (IM 3.9B) to a less -than - significant level. • Mitigation Measures 3.9 / 7.0-12.0 reduced impacts related to disruption or destruction of identified historic resources to a less -than -significant level. These measures would include preparing site -specific archival research for individual resources, encourage adaptive reuse of historic resources, recordation of historic City of Dublin Page 37 Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II February 2014 sites on local state and federal registers, as appropriate and development of preservation programs for significant resources. 2005 MND. No significant impacts or mitigation measures were included in the 2005 MND. The proposed project will be required to comply with the above cultural resource mitigation measures. Proiect Impacts a) Cause substantial adverse change to significant historic resources? No New Impact. No historic resources have been identified in the project area in either the Eastern Dublin EIR or the 2005 MND. Unrecorded cultural resources that could be encountered on the site will be addressed as required by mitigation measures contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR. No new or more severe supplemental impacts have therefore been identified for the proposed project than were disclosed in previous CEQA documents. b, c) Cause a substantial adverse impact or destruction to archeological or paleontological resources? No New Impact. The Eastern Dublin EIR identifies a remote but potentially significant possibility that construction activities, including site grading, trenching and excavation, may uncover significant archeological and / or paleontological resources on development sites. The Eastern Dublin EIR categorized these resources as pre -historic cultural resources. The Eastern Dublin EIR assumed that all pre -historic sites would be disturbed or altered in some manner. This potential impact was identified and addressed in the Eastern Dublin EIR (Impact 3.9 / A) and mitigation measures 3.9 / 1.0 through 3.9 / 4.0 (page 3.9-6 -- 3.9-7) that require subsurface testing for archeological resources; recordation and mapping of such resources; and development of a protection program for resources which qualify as "significant" under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Mitigation Measures 3.9 / 5.0 and 3.9 / 6.0, described above, also were adopted to address the potential disruption of any previously unidentified pre -historic resources and would apply to the project as may be appropriate. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan also contains policies (Policies 6-24 and 6-25) requiring research of archaeological resources prior to construction and determination of the significance and extent of any resources uncovered during grading and construction. Therefore, no new or more significant impacts with respect to cultural resources have been identified that have been previously analyzed in other CEQA documents for the project area and no additional analysis is required. d) Disturb an.y human remains, including those interred outside of a formal cemetery? No New Impact. Existing cultural resource mitigation measures contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MND reduced impacts to human remains to a City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 38 February 2014 less -than -significant level. No new or more severe impacts with respect to cultural impacts are anticipated beyond those previously analyzed. 6. Geology and Soils Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures to reduce anticipated impacts related to Soils, Geology and Seismicity from the General Plan and EDSP project. These include: • Mitigation Measure 3,6 / 1.0 reduced impacts related to primary effects of earthquake ground shaking (IM 3.6 / B) but not to a less -than -significant level. This mitigation measure requires that future structure and infrastructure facilities be designed to applicable local and state building codes. • Mitigation Measures 3.9/ 2.0-6.0 reduced impacts related to the secondary effects of earthquake ground shaking (TM 3.9/C) to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation measures mandate building setbacks from landslides, stabilization of unstable land forms, removal and reconstruction of unstable soils, use of engineered retaining structures, use of appropriately designed and engineered fill, and design of structures to account of potential soil failure. • Mitigation Measures 3,6/9.0-10.0 reduced impacts related to substantial alteration to landforms to a less -than significant level (IM 3.6/D). Mitigations require minimal grading plans with minimal cuts and fills and careful siting of homes and improvements to avoid excessive grading. • Mitigation Measures 3.6/14.0-16.0 reduced impacts related to expansive soils (IM 3.6 / H) to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation measures require formulation of site -specific designs to overcome expansive soils, reducing the amount of moisture in the soil and by appropriate foundation and pavement design. • Mitigation Measures 3.6/17.0-19.0 reduced impacts related to natural slope stability (IM 3.6/1) to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation measures mandate formulation of use of site -specific designs based on follow-on geotechnical reviews of individual developments, limiting the location of improvements on downslopes of unstable soils, removal / reconstruction of potentially unstable slope areas and installation of surface and subsurface slope drainage improvements. • Mitigation Measures 3.6/20.0-26.0 reduced impacts related to cut and fill slope stability (IM 3.6 / J) to a less -than -significant level. These measures include developing grading plans for hillside areas that minimize grading and associate cuts and fills, ensuring that grading plans comply with appropriate building codes, utilizing keys and benches as part of grading to ensure slope stability and City of Dublin initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase fl Page 39 February 2014 minimizing use of unreinforced fill slopes, appropriate compaction of fill areas and on -going maintenance of slope drainage areas. • Mitigation Measure 3.6/27.0 reduced the impact related to short-term construction -related erosion and sedimentation (IM 3.6 / K) to a less -than - significant level. This measure includes limiting timing of construction to avoid the rainy season and implementing a number of other specific erosion control measures. • Mitigation Measure 3.6/28.0 reduced the impact related to Long-term erosion and sedimentation (IM 3.6/L) to a less -than -significant level. This measure includes installation of erosion control facilities into individual development projects, including sediment catch basins, creek bank stabilization, revegetation of graded areas and similar measures. 2005 MND. No supplemental impacts or mitigation measures were identified in this MND. The proposed project will be required to comply with applicable soil, geologic and seismic mitigation measures. Protect Impacts a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse impacts, including loss, injury or death related to ground rupture, seismic ground shaking, ground failure, or landslides? No New Impact. The Eastern Dublin EIR identified that the primary and secondary effects of ground -shaking (Impacts 3.6/B and 3.6 / C) could be potentially significant impacts. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.6 / 1.0 the primary effects of ground -shaking are reduced but not to a less -than - significant level by using modern seismic design for resistance to lateral forces in construction, which would reduce the potential for structure failure, major structural damage and loss of life. Mitigation Measures 3.6 / 2.0 through 3.6 / 7.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR will be implemented to reduce the secondary effects of ground -shaking on proposed project improvements but not to a less -than -significant level. Impact 3.6/B found that impacts related to seismic action in the Eastern Dublin area could damage structures and infrastructure and would be significant and unavoidable. This finding also applies to the proposed Fallon Sports Park Phase II as well. Adherence to Mitigation Measures 20 through 23 by the City will ensure that infrastructure facilities built on the project site will comply with generally recognized seismic safety standards so that effects due to ground shaking and ground failure will be less -than -significant. Overall, no new or more severe impacts would occur with respect to ground rupture, ground shaking, ground failure or landslides than have been previously analyzed. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 40 February 2014 b) Is the site subject to substantial erosion and/or the Toss of topsoil? No New Impact. Construction of the proposed project improvements on the Fallon Sports Park site would modify the existing ground surface and alter patterns of surface runoff and infiltration and could result in a short-term increase in erosion and sedimentation caused by grading activities. Long-term impacts could result from modification of the ground -surface and removal of existing vegetation (Eastern Dublin EIR Impact 3.6 / L). With implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.6 / 27.0 and 28.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR and re -stated above, both of these impacts would be less -than -significant. The Eastern. Dublin Specific Plan also contains a policy (Policy 6-43), which requires that new development be designed to provide effective control of soil erosion as a result of construction activities. This policy will be applied to the proposed project. Overall, with adherence to previous mitigation measures, there would be no new or more severe impacts than have been previously analyzed in other CEQA documents for this site. c,d) Is the site located on soil that is unstable or expansive or result in potential lateral spreading, liquefaction, landslide or collapse? No New Impact. The 2005 MND notes that the project site is located on the Tassajara Geologic Formation and contains colluvium soils with a high shrink -swell potential. With adherence to Eastern Dublin EIR mitigation measures, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan policies that require appropriate building foundations, underlying supports for sports fields and other related techniques, no new or more severe impacts have been identified related to lateral spreading, liquefaction and other soil hazards than have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents. e) Have soils incapable of supporting on -site septic tanks if sewers are not available? No New Impact. Proposed restroom facilities on the site would be connected to sanitary sewers provided by DSRSD, so there would be no new or more severe impacts with regard to septic systems. 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Environmental Setting Since certification of the Eastern Dublin EIR in 1993 and follow-on CEQA documents, the issue of contribution of greenhouse gasses to climate change has become a more prominent issue of concern as evidenced by passage of AB 32 in 2006. On March 18, 2010, amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines took effect which set forth requirements for the analysis of greenhouse gasses. The topic of the project's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change was not analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR or the 2005 MND. Since the Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MND have been approved, the determination of whether greenhouse gasses and climate change needs to be analyzed for this proposed project is governed by the law on supplemental or subsequent EIRs (Public Resources Code section 21166 and City of Dublin Page 41 Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II February 2014 Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). Greenhouse gas and climate change is not required to be analyzed under those standards unless it constitutes "new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete (CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15162 (a) (3).) Greenhouse gas and climate change impacts is not new information that was not known or could not have been known at the time the Eastern Dublin EIR was certified and the 2005 MND was adopted. The issue of climate change and greenhouse gasses was widely known prior to the certification of these EIRs. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was established in 1992. The regulation of greenhouse gas emissions to reduce climate change impacts was extensively debated and analyzed throughout the early 1990s. The studies and analyses of this issue resulted in the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997. In the early and mid 2000s, GHGs and climate change were extensively discussed and analyzed in California. In 2000, SB 1771 established the California Climate Action Registry for the recordation of greenhouse gas emissions to provide information about potential environmental impacts. In 2005, the Governor issued Executive Order # S-03-05 establishing greenhouse gas emission reduction targets in California. AB 32 was adopted in 2006. Therefore, the impact of greenhouse gases on climate change was known at the time of the certification of the Eastern Dublin EIR in May 1993 or the 2005 MND. Under CEQA standards, it is not new information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or negative declaration. No supplemental environmental analysis of the project's impacts on this issue is required under CEQA. Proiect Impacts a,b Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment or conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? As discussed above, no additional environmental analysis is required under CEQA Section 21166. 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Previous CEOA documents 2005 MIVD. No significant impacts were identified with respect to hazards or hazardous materials in the 2005 MND. The topic of hazards and hazardous materials was not analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR. Proiect Impacts a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environanent through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? No New Impact. There would be no impact with regard to transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials, since the proposed project involves construction of an additional phase of a recreational park adjacent to existing phases of the park. There would be no use, storage or transport of significant quantities of hazardous materials associated with the City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 42 February 2014 proposed park. No new or more severe impacts would therefore occur on the site than have been previously analyzed. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset -and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? No New Impact. Based on the discussion in subsection "a," above, no new impacts are anticipated with respect to the release of hazardous materials than were analyzed in the 2005 MND. c) Emit hazardous materials or handle hazardous materials or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. Approval and implementation of the proposed project would have no impact with regard to this topic, since no schools exist or are planned near the project area. No new or more severe impact with respect to emission or handing of hazardous materials within one -quarter of an existing or planned school. d) Is the site Iisted as a hazardous materials site? No New Impact. No properties comprising the project area are listed on the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control as an identified hazardous site as of October 28, 2013. There is therefore no new or more severe impacts impact with respect to this topic than have been previously analyzed. e,f) Is the site located within an airport land use plan of n public airport or private airstrip? No New Impact. The project site is not located near a public or private airport, airfield or airstrip. No new or more severe impacts are anticipated regarding airport safety issues than were discussed in the 2005 MND. g) Interference with an emergency evacuation plan? No New Impact. The proposed park expansion would be located on land owned by the City of Dublin, purchased for park purposes. No emergency evacuation plan would be affected since no roadways would be blocked. No new or more severe impacts would result than have been previously analyzed. h) Expose people and structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No New Impact. The project area is located in a partially undeveloped area with residential development approved to the north and east (Moller Ranch and Mission Peak) and west (Dublin Ranch West). However, significant natural areas remain to the west (Tassajara Creek and adjacent open space easement area) and south (Moller Creek), Adherence to mitigation measures contained in previous CEQA documents will reduce impacts to wildland fire risk to a less -than -significant level. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 43 February 2014 9. Hydrology and Water Quality Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures to reduce anticipated impacts related to hydrology and storm drainage from the General Plan and EDSP project. These include: • Mitigation Measures 3.5/44.0-48 reduced impacts related potential flooding {IM 3.5 / Y) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures require new storm drainage facilities as part of new development, requires developers to prepare storm drain plans for individual development projects and requires new flood control facilities to alleviate downstream flooding potential. • Mitigation Measures 3.5/51.0 and 52.0 reduced impacts related to non --point source pollution (TM 3.5 / AA) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures mandate that specific water quality investigations be submitted as part of development projects and that the City should develop community -based programs to educate residents and businesses to reduce non -point source pollution. 2005 MND. No significant hydrology or water quality issues or mitigation measures were identified in this document. The proposed project shall adhere to all of the applicable above previous mitigation measures. Project Impacts a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? No New Impact. Approval and construction of the proposed development project would add impervious surfaces, including but not limited to a paved parking lot, building areas and pedestrian walkways, to the essentially undeveloped site that would increase the amount of stormwater runoff and potentially degrade water quality. Mitigation Measure 3.5/51.0 contained in the EDSP EIR requires each project developer to prepare and submit a water quality investigation. Adherence to the existing EDSP EIR mitigation measures will ensure that no new or more significant impacts with respect to water quality violations or wastewater discharges would result than have been previously analyzed. b) Substantially deplete groundwater recharge areas or lowering of water table? No New Impact. No new or more significant impacts are anticipated with regard to depletion of groundwater resources than have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents. Although a new parking area would be constructed on the site as well as paved pathways and a number of small buildings, much of the site would remain as open play fields or landscaped areas that would allow recharge of the underground aquifer. Based on discussions with City staff, recycled water from DSRSD would be used for irrigation and a synthetic surface would be used for City of Dublin page 44 Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014 j) playfields, significantly reducing potable water use (source: R. Alex, Dublin Parks and Community Services Department, 10/ 29/ 13). No new or more significant impacts would therefore result than previously analyzed. c) Substantially alter drainage patterns, including streambed courses such that substantial siltation or erosion would occur? No New Impact. Limited new impervious surfaces would be added to the park expansion project site to accommodate a parking lot, r, driveways, pathways, small buildings and similar surfaces. Existing drainage patterns may be slightly modified based on proposed development. However adherence to Mitigation Measure 46.0 contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR would reduce changed drainage patterns to a less -than --significant level. No new or more severe impacts would result with respect to changed drainage patterns than have been previously analyzed. d) Substantially alter drainage patterns or result in flooding, either on or off the project site? No New Impact. No impacts or significant changes to drainage patterns are anticipated as part of the project. Based on the 2005 MND, the project site outside of a FEMA 100-year flood hazard area. No new or more significant impacts are anticipated than have been previously analyzed. e) Create stormwater runoff that would exceed the capacity of drainage systems or add substantial amounts of polluted runoff? No New Impact. Adherence to Eastern Dublin EIR Mitigation Measures 3.5 / 44.0-48.0 will reduce drainage and pollution impacts to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures require new storm drainage facilities as part of new development and requires developers to prepare storm drain plans for individual development projects. No new or more significant impacts have been identified in this Initial Study regarding increases in stormwater runoff than have been previously analyzed. f) Substantially degrade water quality? No New Impact. This is a potentially significant issue and has been addressed above in items "a" and "e." Place housing within a 100--year flood hazard area as mapped by a Flood Insurance Rate Map? No New Impact. No portions of the project site are located within a 100-year flood plain, as documented in the 2005 MND. No new or more significant impacts are anticipated than have been previously analyzed. h, i) Place within a 100-year flood hazard boundary structures that impeded or redirect flood flow, including dam failures? No New Impact. Refer to item "g," above. Result in inundation by seiche, tsunami or mallows? No New Impact. The project site is located well inland from San Francisco Bay or other major bodies of water to be impacted by a tsunami or seiche. No new or more significant impacts would therefore result than have been previously analyzed. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase li Page 45 February 2014 10. Land Use and Planning Proiect Impacts a) Physically divide an established community? No New Impact. The project site is located immediately south of the first phase of Fallon Sports Park, which has been developed as a recreation park. The project site is included as Phase II of the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, which depicts future recreational uses on the site, as currently proposed. Therefore, no existing, established community would be physically divided. No new or more significant impacts have been identified in this Initial Study than have been previously analyzed. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation? No New Impact. No changes are proposed to any regulation regulating environmental protection. No new or more significant impacts are anticipated with regard to land use regulations than have been previously analyzed in previous CEQA documents. c} Conflict witha habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No New Impact. The project site lies within the Eastern Alameda County Conservation Strategy (EACCS) planning area. The City of Dublin utilizes the Conservation Strategy as guidance for environmental permitting for public projects, and private development projects are encouraged to use the EACCS as a resource as well. The Conservation Strategy embodies a regional approach to permitting and mitigation for wildlife habitat impacts associated with land development, infrastructure, and other activities. The Conservation Strategy is neither a Habitat Conservation Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan, but is a document intended to provide guidance during the project planning and permitting process to ensure that impacts are offset in a biologically effective manner. There would therefore be no new or significantly more severe impacts than previously analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR and other CEQA documents prepared for this site. 11. Mineral Resources Proiect Impacts a, b) Result in the loss of availability of regionally or locally significant mineral resources? No New Impact. Neither the Eastern Dublin EIR nor the 2005 MND indicates that significant deposits of minerals exist in the project area, so no new or more severe impacts would occur than have been previously analyzed. City of Dublin initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 46 February 2014 12. Noise Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR notes that major noise sources within Eastern Dublin include traffic noise from arterial roadways, helicopter overflights from Camp Parks RFTA, west of Tassajara Road, noise generated by development of land uses under the Specific Plan and General Plan and construction noise. No specific significant future noise sources are identified on the project site. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures to reduce anticipated noise impacts from the General Plan and EDSP project. These include: • Mitigation Measures 3.10/ 1.0 reduced impacts related to exposure of proposed housing to future roadway noise (IM 3.10 / A) to a less -than -significant level. This mitigation measure require that all future development projects within a future CNEL 60 noise contour have an acoustic analysis prepared to ensure that future dwelling units meet City noise exposure levels. • Mitigation Measures 3.10/4.0 and 5.0 reduced impacts related to construction noise (IM 10 / E) to a less -than -significant level. These mitigation measures require developers to submit construction noise management plans and to limit hours of construction operations. 2005 MND. No significant noise impacts or mitigation measures were identified in the 2005 MND. The proposed project will be required to comply with applicable noise mitigation measures identified above. Project Impacts a) Would the project expose persons or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established by the General Plan or other applicable standard? No New Impact. The 2005 MND found that exposure of persons to excessive noise Levels in above City exposure levels to be less -than -significant. Major source of noise on the Phase II site include distant noise generated by vehicles traveling the 1-580 freeway to the south, traffic noise from Fallon Road and Central Parkway and occasional aircraft flyovers. Table 1, below, shows the current exterior noise exposure levels included in the Noise Element of the General Plan. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 47 February 2014 Table 1. City of Dublin Land Use/Noise Compatibility Standards (decibels) Land Use Residential Lodging Facilities Schools, churches, nursing homes Neighborhood parks Normally Conditionally Normally Acceptable Acceptable Unacceptable 60 or less 60-70 70-75 60 or less 61-80 71-80 60 or less 61-70 71-80 60 or less 61-65 66-70 Office/ Retail 1 70 or less 71-75 Industrial 70 or less 71-75 Source: Dublin General Plan Noise Element, Table 9-1, 2013 76-80 Over 75 Clearly Unacceptable 75+ Over 80 Over 80 Over 70 Over 80 Noise impacts to the proposed relocated day care facility would be less -than - significant by the requirement for the school to meet interior and exterior noise exposure levels as set forth in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Noise impacts for proposed sports fields would be minimized by having future playfields elevated above Central Parkway and out of the "line of sight" of noise transmissions. No new or more significant noise impacts have been identified than have previously analyzed. b) Exposure of people to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? No New Impact. The proposed project would not include construction or operational elements that would result in significant groundborne vibration levels to nearby residents (source: R. Alex, Dublin Parks and Community Services Department, 10 / 30 / 13). No new impacts would result with respect to vibration or groundborne vibration than was analyzed in previous CEQA documents on the project site. c) Substantial increases in permanent in ambient noise levels? No New Impact. Increased levels of permanent noise on the project that would occur based on project construction would be reduced to a less -than significant level through adherence to applicable mitigation measures contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the Dublin Noise Ordinance. No new or more significant impacts have been identified in this Initial Study than have been previously analyzed. d) Substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels without the project? No New Impact. Increased Levels of short-term construction noise generated on the project site would be reduced to a less -than -- significant level through adherence to applicable mitigation measures contained in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the Dublin Noise Ordinance. These measures require project developers to limit hours of construction activity and to prepare construction noise management plans. No new or more significant impacts have been identified in this Initial Study than have been previously analyzed. e, f) For a project located within an airport land use plan, would the project expose people to excessive noise levels? No New Impact. No portions of the site are located within the City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase if Page 48 February 2014 airport referral area for Livermore Municipal Airport. No new or more significant impacts are therefore anticipated in terms of this topic than was previously analyzed in previous CEQA documents. 13. Population and Housing Project Impacts a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly? No New Impact. Approval of the proposed project would not induce substantial additional population growth in the Eastern Dublin area, since development of the Fallon Sports Park has been envisioned in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and Dublin General Plan. In addition, the proposed project would not contain any residences. No new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed are therefore anticipated with respect to this topic. b,c) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing units or people? No New Impact. The proposed expansion area is vacant and no impact would result with respect to displacement of housing units or people. No new or more severe impacts than were previously analyzed are therefore anticipated with respect housing displacement. 14. Public Services Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. Applicable mitigation measures contained in Eastern Dublin FIR addressing fire and police protection include: • Mitigation Measure 3,4/7.0: Establish appropriate funding mechanisms to cover up- front costs of capital fire improvements. • Mitigation Measure 3.4/ 9.0: Incorporate Fire Department recommendations on project design relating to access, water pressure, fire safety and prevention into the requirements of development approval. • Mitigation Measure 3.4/10.0: Ensure, as a requirement of project approval, that an assessment district, homeowners association or other mechanism is in place that will provide regular long-term maintenance of the urban/ open space interface, • Mitigation Measure 3.4 / 12.0: The City shall work with the Fire Department and qualified biologists to prepare a wildfire management plan for the project area. • Mitigation Measure 3.4/1.0: Provide additional personnel and facilities and revise beats as necessary in order to establish and maintain City standards for police protection service in Eastern Dublin. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 49 February 2014 • Mitigation Measure 3.4/3.0-5.0: Incorporate into the requirements of project approval Police Department recommendations on project design that affect traffic safety and crime prevention. 2005 MND. No significant public utility impacts or mitigation measures were identified in the 2005 MND. The project will be required to comply with the above mitigation measures. Project Impacts a) Fire protection? No New Impact. Approval and implementation of the proposed project would increase the number of fire and emergency medical calls for service that would need to be responded to by the Alameda County Fire Department, the City of Dublin's contract fire department, as a result of increased recreational use of Phase II of Fallon Sports Park. Consistent with Eastern Dublin EIR Mitigation Measure 3.419.0, proposed development of the park will be reviewed by the Fire Department to meet Fire Department requirements including but not limited to maintaining minimum water pressure and fire flow, providing adequate site access, using fire retardant building materials and similar features. Proposed development on the site will also be conditioned to be consistent with the City's adopted Wildfire Management Plan (Eastern Dublin EIR Mitigation Measure 3.4112.0). Based on discussions with Alameda County Fire Deparhnent staff, there would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts with respect to fire service beyond that analyzed in previous CEQA documents (source: Bonnie Terra, Alameda County Fire Department, 10/28 / 13) and no new or expanded fire stations would be needed to provide fire and emergency service for the proposed project. Police protection? No New Impact. Similar to fire protection, there would be no new impact with regard to police protection, based on mitigation measures included in the Eastern Dublin EIR. These Mitigation Measures include incorporating Police Department safety and security requirements into the proposed project, including but not limited to adequate locking devices, security lighting and ensuring adequate surveillance for structures and parking areas (EDSP EIR Mitigation Measures 3.4 / 3.0-5.0). Based on discussions with Dublin Police Services Department staff, there would be no new or substantially more severe impacts with respect to police service associated with the proposed project beyond that analyzed in previous CEQA documents (source: Captain Tom McCarthy, Dublin Police Services, 10 / 28/ 13). c) Schools? No New Impact. No new impacts to school service are anticipated should the proposed project be approved since no residents that would generate school aged children would be built.. There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts with respect to this impact than has been previously analyzed in previous CEQA documents. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 50 February 2014 Other governmental service, including maintenance of public facilities? No New Impact. Maintenance of public facilities would continue to be provided by the City of Dublin with no new impacts in regard to this topic. New public facilities will be required to be designed to meet City of Dublin standards. There would therefore be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts with respect to this impact than has been previously analyzed in previous CEQA documents. 15. Recreation Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. Applicable mitigation measures contained in Eastern Dublin EIR addressing fire and police protection include: • Mitigation Measure 3.4 / 29.0: Ensure, as a part of the approval process, that each new development provide its fair share of planned open space, parklands and trail corridors. • Mitigation Measure 3.4/31.0: Calculate and assess in -lieu park fees based on the City's parkland dedication ordinance. Credit towards parkland dedication requirements will only be given for level or gently sloping areas suitable for active recreation use. • Mitigation Measure 3.4/36.0: Require developer to dedicate public access easements along ridgetops and stream corridors to accommodate the development of trails and staging areas. No mitigation measures were included in the 2005 MND. Project Impacts a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks? No New Impact. Approval and construction of the proposed project would increase the use of City or regional recreational facilities, since the underlying project includes construction of new park and recreation facilities as part of the Fallon Sports Park. The intent of the project is to expand park and recreation opportunities in the Eastern Dublin planning area as directed by the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. There would therefore be no new or more severe impacts with respect to recreation than were previously analyzed. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction of recreational facilities? See item "a," above. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 51 February 2014 16. Transportation/Traffic Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR contains a number of mitigation measures to reduce anticipated traffic impacts from the General Plan and EDSP project. These measures generally include construction of new roadways, widening of existing roadways and improvements to local freeway facilities to accommodate anticipated increases in the number of vehicles associated with the build out of the Eastern Dublin area. With the exceptions noted below, the EIR found that all traffic and transportation impacts could be reduced to less -than -significant levels with adherence to mitigation measures identified in the EIR. A number of impacts could not be reduced to a level of insignificance even with mitigations. These include: impacts to the 1-580 freeway between I-680 and Hacienda Drive (IM 3.3/B), impacts to the 1-580 Freeway between Tassajara Road and Airway Boulevard (IM 3.3 j C), cumulative freeway impacts (IM 3.3/E) impacts to Santa Rita Road and T-580 Eastbound ramps (IM 3.3 / I), and cumulative impacts to Tassajara Road (IM 3.3/N). 2005 MND. One Mitigation Measure dealing with traffic and transportation was included in the 2005 MND. Mitigation Measure 3 required that a future study be completed at the entrance of proposed Phase II of the Park from Central Parkway prior to the development of this area, with consideration given to the potential for multi- family housing on the south side of Central Parkway from Fallon Sports Park. The proposed project will be required to comply with all of the above transportation and circulation mitigation measures. Project Impacts a,b) Conflict with applicable plans related to the effectiveness of the circulation system, including all modes of travel, including intersections, streets, highways and other components or conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including level of service standards, travel demand measures and other applicable standards? No New Impact. The Eastern Dublin EIR considered the development of Fallon Sports Park and, following approval of the Specific Plan and EIR, approved development impact fees for Eastern Dublin that provided funding for local and community parks and transportation improvements in Eastern Dublin. Many of the proposed road and pedestrian improvements have been installed by either the City or by local developers. Future traffic that would be generated by construction of the Lower Terrace of the Fallon Sports Park have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents for Eastern Dublin and for the original Park Master Plan. Proposed uses within the park expansion are generally consistent with those included in the 2005 Park Master Plan. The proposed relocation of the day care facility to the Phase I of the Park was not considered in previous documents; however, based on the information about City of Dublin Page 52 Initial Study/Fallon Sports ParklPhase II February 2014 hours of operation included in the Project Description section of this Initial Study, the proposed day care would operate between the hours of late morning and early afternoon on weekdays. Traffic generated by the proposed day care operation would therefore be outside of a.m. and p.m peak hours, so this traffic would not contribute vehicles to nearby major intersections or to nearby freeways. Also, it is assumed that many of the trips to and from the relocated preschool facility are currently in operation, although the routes of the new trips would be somewhat different from current traffic patterns. A driveway has been constructed from Central Parkway into the Lower Terrace portion of the park. Since the improvement plans that depicted the location of he driveway have been approved by the Dublin Public Works Department, Mitigation Measure 3 contained in the 2005 MND has been satisfied. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts would result with respect to intersections, streets highways, routes of regional significance or other components of the local and regional circulation system than have been previously analyzed. c} Change in air traffic patterns? No New Impact. The proposed project includes park and recreational uses and would have no impact on air traffic patterns. No new or more severe impacts would result with respect to this topic than was previously analyzed in other CEQA documents. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use? No New Impact. The primary on -site circulation feature on the Phase II park site would be a parking lot for approximately 145 vehicles. Adherence to Mitigation Measure 2 contained in the 2005 MND requires a study for the location of the drive entrance to the park site. This analysis will also determine if adequate driver site lines would be provided and that other safety standards would be met. No new or more severe impacts with respect to design hazards would be created than previously analyzed. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? No New Impact. A single drive access to Central Parkway would be provided to serve the Lower Terrace portion of the park that would meet City of Dublin and Alameda County Fire Department design standards to ensure that adequate emergency access would be provided. No new or more severe impacts would result with respect to this topic. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? No New Impact. No conflicts to plans, policies or programs that promote public transit, pedestrian use or similar features were identified in the 2005 MND as part of previous CEQA review of the overall park development. No new or more impacts have been identified in this Initial Study that has been previously analyzed in other CEQA documents. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 53 February 2014 16. Utilities and Service Systems Environmental Setting The project area is served by the following service providers: • Water supply and distribution: Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD). • Sewage collection and treatment; recycled water: DSRSD. • Storm drainage: City of Dublin and Zone 7. • Solid waste service: Amador Valley Industries • Electrical and natural gas power: Pacific Gas and Electric Co. • Communications: AT BcT Previous CEOA documents Eastern Dublin EIR. In terms of water resources, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified overdraft of groundwater resources (Impact 15 / P) as a potentially significant impact Adherence to Mitigation Measures 3.5/24.0 and 25.0 would reduce this impact to a level of insignificant. These measures require the City of Dublin to coordinate with DSRSD to develop recycled water resources and otherwise carefully use water resources and that all new development in the Eastern Dublin project area to connect to the DSRSD water system. Impact 3.5 / Q identified an increase in water demand as a potentially significant impact, but this impact could be mitigated to an insignificant level based on implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.5/26.0-31.0. These mitigation measures require implementation of water conservation measures in individual development projects and construction of new system -wide water improvements which are funded by development impact fees. Another related impact identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR is the need for additional water treatment plant capacity (Impact 3.5/R). This impact was identified as being reduced to a level of insignificance through the implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.5 / 32.0-31.0, which requires improvement to the Zone 7 water system, to be funded by individual development impact fees, Impact 3.5/S (lack of a water distribution system) was identified as a potentially significant impact in the Eastern Dublin EIR, but this impact has been reduced to an insignificant level through adherence to Mitigation Measures3.5/4.34.0-38.0. These mitigations require upgrades to the project area water system and provision of a "will serve" letter prior to issuance of a grading permit. Impact 3.5/T identified a potentially significant impact related to inducement of substantial growth and concentration of population in the project area_ The Eastern Dublin found that this was a significant and unavoidable impact. Regarding sewer service, the Eastern Dublin EIR identified Impact 3.5 / B (lack of a wastewater collection system) as a potentially significant impact that could be mitigated City of Dublin Page 54 Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 February 2014 through adherence to Mitigation Measures 3.5/1.0-5.0. These measures require DSRSD to prepare an area -wide wastewater collection system master plan, requires all new development to be connected to DSRSD's public sewer system, discourages on -site wastewater treatment, requires a "will -serve" letter from DSRSD and requires that all sewer facilities be constructed to DSRSD engineering standards. Impact 3.5 noted an impact with regard to extension of a sewer trunk line with capacity to serve new development, but could be reduced to an insignificant level since the proposed Eastern Dublin Specific Plan sewer system has been sized to accommodate increased sewer demand from the proposed Specific Plan project. Impact 3.5/G found that lack of wastewater disposal capacity as a significant impact. An upgraded wastewater disposal facility is presently being constructed by the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency. Impact 3.5 / E identified lack of wastewater treatment plant capacity as a potentially significant impact, which could be reduced to an insignificant level through adherence to Mitigation Measure. No significant impacts or mitigation measures pertaining to utilities or service systems were identified in the 2005 MND. Project Impacts a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the RWQCB? No New Impact. The current project would contain the same type of development as analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR and he 2005 MND. based on recent discussions with DSRSD staff (noted below) regarding this project, the proposed project would not exceed wastewater requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). No new or more significant impacts with respect to wastewater treatment requirements have been identified in this Initial Study than have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents. b) Require new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities? No New Impact. Water, recycled water and wastewater extensions to existing mains in Central Parkway and other local roads would need to be extended to provide recycled water for field irrigation and potable water for restrooms, drinking fountains and similar uses. Sewer laterals would also need to be extended to the site to serve proposed restrooms and concession uses. According to a representative of DSRSD, District wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities and proposed recycled and domestic water for the proposed project would not result in a new or more significant impact than was analyzed in previous CEQA documents (source: Stan Kolozdie, DSRSD 11 / 11 / 13) c) Require new storm drainage facilities? No New Impact. The proposed expansion of Fallon Sports Park would require new and or upgraded drainage facilities to support proposed new uses. Consistent with Eastern Dublin EIR Mitigation Measures, the project developer (City of Dublin) will be required to install new or upgraded on and off -site (if required) storm drain systems that comply with City of Dublin and Zone 7 standards. No storm drainage impacts were identified in other previous CEQA documents. No new or more significant impacts are anticipated with respect to storm drain facilities that have been analyzed in previous CEQA documents. City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 55 February 2014 d) Are sufficient water supplies available? No New Impact. Based on the information provided by DSRSD staff, the District has planned for future urban uses on this site and included such development in the District's Urban Water Management Plan (source: Stan Kalozdie, DSRSD,11 / 11 / 13). No new or more significant are anticipated with respect to water supplies than have been previously analyzed. e) Adequate wastewater capacity to serve the proposed project? See response to "a," above. e, f) Solid waste disposal? No New Impact. The project site is within the franchise area of Amador Valley Industries that provides residential and commercial solid waste pick-up and recycling services. Fallon Sports Park is currently receiving solid waste services from Amador Valley Industries. The topic of solid waste disposal was not identified as a potentially significant impact in previous CEQA documents and no new or more significant impacts have been identified in this Initial Study than have been previously analyzed. Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No New Impact. The existing service provider will ensure adherence to federal, state and local solid waste regulations. No new or more severe impacts are anticipated impacts than have been previously analyzed. 17. Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? No. Potential impacts related to biological resources, including a reduction in habitat area of fish or wildlife species, elimination of a plant or animal community, or elimination of an important example of major periods of California history or prehistory was analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MN. The proposed project would represent a similar development type that was previously analyzed and no new or more significant impacts are anticipated than previously analyzed. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects). No. Cumulative impacts of the proposed Fallon Sports Park project have been analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No. No such impacts have been discovered in the course of preparing this Initial Study. City of Dublin initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase 11 Page 56 February 2014 Initial Study Preparers Jerry Haag, Urban Planner, project manager Agencies and Organizations Consulted The following agencies and organizations were contacted in the course of this Initial Study: City of Dublin Paul McCreary, Director of Parks and Community Services Rosemary Alex, Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator Bonnie Terra, Alameda County Fire Department Chief Tom McCarthy, Dublin Police Services Kathleen Faubion, AICP, Assistant City Attorney California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC) Website DSRSD Stan Kolozdie References Dublin General Plan, City of Dublin, Updated through 7/ 2/ 11 Eastern Dublin General Plan, Wallace Roberts & Todd, 1993 Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Environmental Irnuact Report, Wallace Roberts & Todd, 1994 Fallon Sports Park Master Plan, Carducci & Associates, , 2006 Livermore Municipal Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, ESA Associates, August 2012 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, City of Dublin, 2006 update City of Dublin Initial Study/Fallon Sports Park/Phase II Page 57 February 2014 CEQAADDENDUM CEQA ADDENDUM FOR THE FALLON SPORTS PARK PHASE II PROJECT February 7, 2014 On May 10, 1993, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 51-93, certifying an Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan ("Eastern Dublin EIR, SCH #91103064). The certified EIR consisted of a Draft EIR and Responses to Comments bound volumes, as well as an Addendum to the Eastern Dublin EIR dated May 4, 1993, assessing a reduced development project alternative. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 53-93 approving a General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan for the reduced area alternative on May 10, 1993. On August 22, 1994, the City Council adopted a second Addendum updating wastewater disposal plans for Eastern Dublin. The Eastern Dublin EIR evaluated the potential environmental effects of urbanizing Eastern Dublin over a 20 to 30 year period. Since certification of the EIR, many implementing projects have been proposed, relying to various degrees on the certified EIR. In 2005, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 89-05 that approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan. The 2005 MND analyzed the environmental impacts of approving a Master Plan for the development of the Fallon Sports Park, located on the northwest corner of Fallon Road and Central Parkway and constructing recreational improvements envisioned in the Master Plan. This Addendum has been prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 for the Project, as described below. Project Description The current application includes approving and developing the Lower Terrace of the Park, also identified as Phase II. Overall improvements envisioned for this phase include but are not limited to: • Constructing an on -site entry road at the existing curb cut along the north side of Central Parkway; • Building an approximately 145-space vehicle parking lot. • Constructing a combination restroom and concession building. • Extending existing on -site pedestrian pathways from the existing park. • Constructing a 90' lighted baseball field. • Construction of a 2,000 square foot building for public use, including but not limited to community meetings, rentals, etc.) • Constructing two synthetic turf lighted soccer fields plus a warm up area. • Extending utility lines. • Temporarily relocating a City pre-school facility for a five-year period. • Related improvements, such as site grading and water quality features, to facilitate the above improvements. Prior CEQA Analyses and Determinations As summarized above and discussed in more detail in the attached Initial Study, the site has been planned for a community park since the Eastern Dublin approvals in 1993 and has been the subject of a Mitigated Negative Declaration in 2005. Tlie Eastern Dublin EIR identified numerous environmental impacts, and numerous mitigations were adopted upon approval of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. For identified impacts that could not be mitigated to insignificance, the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Similarly, the 2005 MND identified environmental impacts and mitigation measures. All previously adopted mitigation measures for development of Eastern Dublin identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MND that are applicable to the Project and Project site continue to apply to the currently proposed Project as further discussed in the attached Initial Study. Current CEQA Analysis and Determination that an Addendum is Appropriate for this Project. Updated Initial Study. The City of Dublin has determined that an Addendum is the appropriate CEQA review for the Project, which proposes minor changes to the approved Fallon Sports Park Master Plan. If approved, the proposed project would allow lighted soccer fields and a temporarily relocated City pre-school facility within the park. The City prepared an updated Initial Study dated February 7, 2014, incorporated herein by reference, to assess whether any further environmental review is required for this Project Through this Initial Study, the City has determined that no subsequent EIR, or Negative Declaration is required for the plan and zoning amendments or the refined development details. No Subsequent Review is Required per CEOA Guidelines Section 15162. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 identifies the conditions requiring subsequent environmental review. After a review of these conditions, the City has determined that no subsequent EIR or negative declaration is required for this Project. This is based on the following analysis: a) Are there substantial changes to the Project involving new or more severe significant impacts? There are no substantial changes to the Project analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MND. The Project is similar to land uses for the project site analyzed in previous CEQA documents. As demonstrated in the Initial Study, the proposed changes within park would not be a substantial change to either the 1993 Eastern Dublin EIR analysis or the 2005 MND and will not result in additional significant impacts, and no additional or different mitigation measures are required. b) Are there substantial changes in the conditions which the Project is undertaken involving new or more severe significant impacts? There are no substantial changes in the conditions assumed in the Eastern Dublin EIR or the 2005 MND. This is documented in the attached Initial Study prepared for this Project dated February 7, 2014. Page 2 c) Is there new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the previous EIR that shows the Project will have a significant effect not addressed in the previous EIR; or previous effects are more severe; ar, previously infeasible mitigation measures are now feasible but the applicant declined to adopt them; or mitigation measures considerably different front those in the previous EIR would substantially reduce significant effects but the applicant declines to adopt them? As documented in the attached Initial Study, there is no new information showing a new or more severe significant effect beyond those identified in the prior CEQA documents. Similarly, the Initial Study documents that no new or different mitigation measures are required for the Project, All previously adopted mitigations continue to apply to the Project. The previously approved CEQA documents adequately describe the impacts and mitigations associated with the proposed development on portions of the Fallon Sports Park site. d) If no subsequent EIR-level review is required, should a subsequent negative declaration be prepared? No subsequent negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration is required because there are no impacts, significant or otherwise, of the Project beyond those identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR and previous CEQA documents for the site, as documented in the attached initial Study. Conclusion. This Addendum is adopted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 based on the attached Initial Study dated February 7, 2014. The Addendum and Initial Study review the proposed changes to the Fallon Sports Park Master Plan as discussed above. Through the adoption of this Addendum and related Initial Study, the City determines that the above minor changes in land uses do not require a subsequent EIR or negative declaration under CEQA Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163. The City further determines that the Eastern Dublin EIR and the 2005 MND adequately address the potential environmental impacts of the Master Plan change as documented in the attached Initial Study. As provided in Section 15164 of the Guidelines, the Addendum need not be circulated for public review, but shall be considered with the prior environmental documents before snaking a decision on this project. The Initial Study, Eastern Dublin EIR, the 2005 MND, and all resolutions cited above are incorporated herein by reference and are available for public review during normal business hours in the Community Development Department, Dublin City Hall, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin CA during norrnal business hours. Page 3 Number — PKO 119 FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 Program — PARKS PROJECT DESCRIPTION Fallon Sports Park is a 60-acre community park bordered by Fallon Road, Central Parkway, Lockhart Street and Gleason Drive. Phases 1 and 2 of the park have been completed and Phase 3 represents the final phase of park development. The Phase 3 project provides for the design and construction of the remaining 14 acres of Fallon Sports Park, referred to as the Upper Terrace. On December 17, 2019, City Council approved the concept design that includes a cricket field, sand volleyball courts and multi -sport batting cages. Construction is anticipated to start in 2021. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT: $260,000 MANAGING DEPARTMENT: Public Works 2020-2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ESTIMATED COSTS PRIOR 2019-2020 YEARS BUDGET 2020-2021 2021-2022 FUTURE 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 YEARS TOTALS 9100 - Salaries & Benefits 9200 - Contract Services 9400 - Improvements 9500- Miscellaneous $19,909 $44,519 $105,590 $55,696 $1,938,416 $980,924 $7,252,846 $26 $200,074 $170,018 $1,994,112 $8,233,770 $200,100 TOTAL $75,631 $3,163,933 $7,358,436 $10,598,000 FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR 2019-2020 FUTURE YEARS BUDGET 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 YEARS TOTALS 4100 - Public Facility Fees $75,631 $3,163,933 $7,358,436 $10,598,000 TOTAL $75,631 $3,163,933 $7,358,436 $10,598,000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 Parks City of Dublin Capital Improvement Program 2020-2025 Page 46