HomeMy WebLinkAbout6.10 Rainbow Investment Co Rezone Request V
CITY OF DUBLIN
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
City Council Meeting Date: September 28, 1987
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: PA 87-076 Rainbow Investment Company request to rezone a
1.3+ acre partially developed property from a C-0,
Administrative Office District to a PD, Planned
Development District at 7601 Amador Valley Boulevard.
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit A: Draft Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance.
Background Attachment 1 City Council Resolution
Approving PD, Planned
Development Rezoning
RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open public hearing.
2) Hear Staff presentation.
3) Receive testimony from the Applicant and the public.
4) Question Staff, the Applicant and the public.
5) Close public hearing and deliberate.
5) Waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance
(Exhibit A) .
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None.
DESCRIPTION: On September 14, 1987, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving
PA. 87-076 Rainbow Investment Company Rezoning application and introduced an Ordinance
amending the Zoning Ordinance.
The application involves the rezoning of a 1.3+ acre partially developed property at
7601 Amador Valley Boulevard from a C-0, Administrative Office District to a PD,
Planned Development District
Staff recommends that the City Council waive the second reading and adopt the
Ordinance (Exhibit A) .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COPIES TO: Applicant/Owner
ITEM NO. r File PA 87-076
a.+iaiae°a1�5?ld'1.�tdf+'v;�i�NiF:�b:�,lti;�a,.:�+«�..",..'4x;:iit�;:�:6kliGilvYlt�`. t'ffi��3i�"3a [ '��'�ztxuaaa�� �a�rcs...+,�:cra;:au:;n:;eua:cs��'xrtr�:GO:uur.�s.^^wsru+esiviz�,rsrmt:•c�,�xec�ya.:s.�ar-a;M-,w :.
2♦
= t DRAFT. ORDINANCE NO.`
,,,;,,,1,.,•,., *;, ..:,,,,k,;,,,AN,,0,RDINANCE .OF.:.:T�iE,::,CITY;OF,,DUBLIN. AMENDING,:THEN-ZON-ING-•ORDINANCE-.TO PERMITr�..:-��r --r -�+--•�
THE REZONING OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST'AND'SOUTHWEST
CORNERS OF THE INTERSECTION OF AMADOR PLAZA ROAD AND DUBLIN BOULEVARD
-----------------=---------------------------------------------------------
The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: .
Section 1
Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Dublin Ordinance Code is hereby amended in the
following manner:
Approximately 1.3 acres consisting of lands fronting along the northeast
corner of Starward Drive and Amador Valley Boulevard and the northwest corner of
Donahue Drive and Amador Valley Boulevard, more specifically described as
Assessor's Parcel Number 941-173-1-6, to a PD, Planned Development District; and
PA 87-076 - Rainbow Investment Company, as shown on Exhibit A (Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance) , and Exhibit B (Approval, Findings and
General Provisions of the PD, Planned Development Rezoning) on file with the City
of Dublin Planning Department, are hereby adopted as regulations for the future
use, improvement, and maintenance of the property within this District.
A map depicting the rezoning area is, outlined below:
��. .
"}�1 �•e 15U1 Z.U.
i� A.C.Ord. *so. N*
1 �N 82-3
R-S-D"3
-tsll R„V
c oo«i N���� u ,51x, '�, R\ _D_20 C-1
PAl2-33 I`- Y e• `
i
C-O
' �"
o?b
i
_Cni-- r B PD,
S R.R.S. �V. �ST��
Section 2
This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days from and
after its passage. Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage,
it shall be published once, with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the same, in The Herald, a newspaper published in Alameda County and
available in the City of Dublin.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 28th
day of September, 1987, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
RIM
EXmI211BIT A
drd�n�v+ c
Pm 7 -2-07Co
. .e.::.:'a'::w:imU 41T:W:u.W9Tf.0''".'.'Swril:iMhM.H1...,�::J'... ..'!', h,"i.,-Ay @ -;',,F_41;�n..s..,ti;Lwr+su•/v.WrN dIWlMwsr-NNrmN/MYIe<IM.M'1�.:i.rsar.irua:. r 4J.b ,. .
}4,
RESOLUTION NO. 74 - 87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
ADOPTING FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
FOR A PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING CONCERNING PA 87-076,
RAINBOW INVESTMENT COMPANY REZONING APPLICATION
WHEREAS, Robert Glockner filed an application to rezone
approximately 1.3 acres from a C-0, Administrative Office District to a C-1,
Retail Business District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on
August 17, 1987, at which time the Planning Commission adopted Resolution
No. 87-063, consistent with Staff's recommendations, recommending that the City
Council rezone the property to a PD, Planned Development District allowing a
general range of C-1, Retail Business District uses which, along with the
application of site specific development criteria, would be consistent with the
goals and objectives identified in the recently adopted Dublin Downtown
Specific Plan and which would also be reflective of the sites'- potential
impacts to the existing adjoining residential land uses; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative
Declaration of Environmental- Significance has been adopted (City Council
' Resolution No. 73 - 87) for this project, as it will have no significant effect
on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and consider all said reports,
recommendations and testimony herein above set forth; and
WHEREAS, rezoning the property to a PD, Planned Development
District will be appropriate for the subject property in terms of providing a
range of allowable and conditionally allowable uses which will be compatible to
existing and proposed land uses in the immediate vicinity and conforming to the
underlying land use designation; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning will not have a substantial adverse affect on
health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be
injurious to property or public improvement; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning will not overburden public services; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City Council approves the
PD, Planned Development Rezoning request subject to the following general
provisions:
1. The subject PD, Planned Development District is established to provide
areas for comparison retail shopping and office uses, with the specific
range of permitted uses to include the following:
a) Retail Stores
b) Office Uses (as delineated in Section 8-46.1 a) of the Zoning
Ordinance)
c) Financial Institutions
d) Service Commercial (including, but not limited to: Barber Shop, Beauty
Parlor, Tailor Shop, Handicraft Shop, Repair Shop for Cameras, Shoes,
Watches and Household Applicances)
T ACH ENT I
- -MPrvJ��
D-0 t le I - KZ-r1 4
!r.... , ...•.. ..r ...II .n.l Ytw ../.!1 r...n..r...r .l... !.. •I ... .. .. .. •, .1:1 Y..•r.-..x':./.a. ...... I rn.,r, Ya•...... r•.e..... , ..M r✓.-w.5w / 'lNrrr...,.wu... ......,.I,r ._ ,.
i
2. Conditional uses in the subject PD, Planned Development District permitted
. ..--only._,if.appgoyed as_pro.vided.in,_.Se,ction;.,8,_.94...O..of-:th_e-..Zoning=.-Ordinance -- •,, -.
shall include:
a) Community Facility
b) Commercial Recreation Facility, if within a building
c) Hotel, Motel or Boarding House
d) Service Station, Type A
e) Restaurant or Tavern
3. Minimum setback requirements for new development on the subject property
shall be as follows:
a) Front Yards: For this site, for purposes of calculating setback
requirements and the property's front lot line, the minimum setback
from Amador Valley Boulevard shall be a minimum of 20 feet for single-
story stuctures and a minimum of 25 feet for any structure with a
height in excess of 18 feet.
b) Street-Side Side Yard: The setback from both Starward Drive and
Donahue Drive shall be a minimum of 20 feet, a standard which shall
extend to the mid-point of the radius returns onto Amador Valley
Boulevard.
c) Side and Rear Setbacks: The minimum setbacks along the property's
north and west boundaries shall be 10 feet for one-story structures and
15 feet for structures with a height in excess of 18 feet.
4. No building established in this PD, Planned Development District shall
exceed a height of two-stories or 35 feet.
5. No building or buildings estalished in this PD, Planned Development
District shall exceed a maximum lot coverage of 35 percent.
6. A minimum of 25 percent of the land in this PD, Planned Development
District shall not be occupied by buildings, structures, or pavement, but
shall be landscaped. A minimum of 75 percent of this open area shall be
planted and maintained with growing plants.
7. Development of any new structure in this PD, Planned Development District,
or any construction activity in the form of exterior building alterations
(beyond minor alterations and/or repairs) or additions involving the
existing structures in the District, shall be subject to Site Development
Review pursuant to Section 8-95.0 of the Zoning Ordinance. Plans submitted
for a Site Development Review application covering this site shall detail
the following site modifications.
a) Elimination of the existing unused drive-thru window roof and support
structure and creation of a two-way on-site driveway connection between
on-site parking areas.
b) Modification of the dimensional layout and striping plan layout for the
westerly parking lot to create a 90-degree, double-loaded parking area
with a raised landscape planter separation between the parking lot and
the adjoining on-site driveway.
c) Elimination of the southerly Donahue Drive driveway with a concurrent
revamping of the eastern parking area to substantially reflect the
layout and dimensions of the 90-degree, double-loaded parking area
detailed in the Staff Study dated August, 1987.
8. Prior to occupancy of any existing or new structure by a use allowed by
this District, compliance with the following City Engineer recommendations
shall occur:
a) Repair deficiencies in existing frontage improvements such as chipped
and offset sidewalk as required by the City Engineer.
b) Raise low dirt grade to be level with the sidewalk.
c) Remove damaged fence and post at the northeast driveway.
d) Trim landscaping at all driveways so that sight distance for vehicles
entering and exiting the site is not obstructed. Also trim landscaping
that is encroaching on the sidewalk.
-2-
CdBIWOW—W 40166w fa ' _wp+ mv u n .. ,.x` i
.,,t�y1 r- r h a 'y✓.n,p, i. a..u,... J z i"/f.�a iti2 ,j•
A(3!t.+t J y., i rR�j.n.r 15t'.Er y rV.U`.a�'1�:L:N'.lL i"\t t�•i*r�fi',ya�', i'r •�r^'YSr.Y 7'd}r N l'kYSir n/t+Y s„�t N.r r i i R ti�u�s!rs KllS,.ij,i'"k,y'/,i4L'f,Y,•.Sr;IQi Y'3' 'it J a�rri;�p'�J.ri�'f �p` - iJr.J+1 1''; 3�1.t.„. �,i 4 .i.w.�Lu;F r. l
.{,r} k F n l I.!, g.v. e•^`;ib�tlyg F-yf d 3� .. 11r r.+,J�,`)�yc'7yy,'�'+1"E:'irr�R,..,�{v y'�`a r p 5,'4
_
.Ir-I f...� / tE{y.f/h' &;•'�l.r�'�W4{5 w�d +.(., �
1 7 /�j �. t � '.n;,�," .i r:..Jx/!���` { � .� � ;� �}!r'tr��� ! 'iF � '+�''��,•L!-q�7�"{'-I.vt.�y �•P• �r +d� F�,^� +�_•°isair�'�� #y' .t j
1�
l4 P 4Jt r 1 n !r r2 h tAK fv �y, tyr �d a �"Lf al.{lf
., .y,s. {� J v 't r r' v .) ik It=�y r• t i v t fii 'Irs31• d+'�dyt�''„
r -/'t nt vA - s t ,"'4��� R� �' Sl � ��+.�`� �^ 01 ��1 3�! ryF�i 7L r'•�-""vH""tY r
. � �'i r i u r1,.){W iiY ::{ �k ..?i, � ^t r :';v.t� .i� _ lti_`rs'/.��r�ti"d`uL tr�i4s�►���"�r-7�y7'"�a�ra�'''•�i*..}?C •'fit .
9. .': Develo ment:of an structure in this PD ``"Planned Develo merit"District "'�
P y ►._ p or
any construction activity in the form:ofexterior`building`'alterations
(beyond minor alterations and/or repairs) or,"'additions "involving_'the �.
existing- structures `in='the•°Di`strict ''-;shall not"occur until ;the Developer.
makes a contribution to the planned future."'signal`at,`Amador.Plaza,Road and ,
Amador ,Valley Boulevard. ';The amount of.'contributioii:'shall Abe',determined by
the City Engineer based on increased„traffie'generated by the"project,
,-in no case to exceed 5% of the signalization cost or $5;000,00 r'✓
10. Except as specifically modified by the•above °listed Conditions of
.. .,
Approval; development and operation of land usJ. e activities"'within'"this PD;
Planned Development District shall be subject to_the•='guidelines 6f the.-.-...
C-1, Retail Business District of the City .of.Dublin Zoning Ordinance as ."''
regards both land use restrictions and minimum/maximum"development
criteria.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of September, 1987.
AYES: . Councilmembers Hegarty, Moffatt, Snyder, Vonheeder and
Mayor Jeffery
NOES: None
ABSENT: None -
Mayo
ATTEST:
1 7,Y.t
—city Clerk .
-3-