HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.08 Non Point Water Pollution AgreementH
H
t
z
O
H
0
a
r• m
d
0 0
m a
N O'
rt fD
o
rt fD
as
o G -t
UGi m UOi
d
o rt
o
G r-+,
rt
r• rt
D
C R•
G'
w m
cn N•
rr,
H
n d
rt m
r•
m m
rt
w rt
h
m o0
m
ro a
OG "d
a
o w
rt rt
o r•
n
0
r• o
I rn
a w p L rt b rt m o a
w w O p O fD rt t-h O D
rt C d Uo D d m G rt
wow o r• G rt art cow
m C G G N r• C G' r•
N C7 rt N rt H rw-r C7 0 4 crn N H
r G o H w r• G r• a
fD w d m E3 r• O d I-` r• N N
w d o w w d
a r• c rt r• r• p n N
C r• G H, o m d p d rt m o 0
G m n r• rt r• a b
d a n m o m o w w o w
o r• r• rt r• rt u.
o r7 rt rt G m n d r• c w
G o ort m`Cr r rt
a r• to o d G G H, w
rD p rt m p v, o M a rt o r
C ri P- N Fwh IG-' Uri rGr C V rt
I H, rt w w p r• o n
o rt r• n r• a o o rt m C m
t7 O F, O F-' fD rt C O w O
o K o w U, m C w I w rt N G
a s rt rt o cn rt rr w G r•
x' m w m ro r• w t
a n o a o r• rt m
r• r• rt b m o r-i, p r• m
rt w w o o o o0 0
r• r• p r• w p r• p w
r• p I rt p G o rt w G rt o0
m cn r• oo r• rt rn m b r• p' o 0
NfDr' ww• d° rto
p rt o w G' N, p w I G r•
a o oomawcrt w cfDn
f N r• m rt w cn P• I
w w rt d C ri o r• p rt d
rt p o N N rt a G w o r•
r• a m r• w a r• rt
c c p m N a p
o G o woo rt m rt r•
I C d G rt p r• p
c m p w w rD a rt o
rt
H, rt N Pa m b G
r• o rt w r• oo rt w n w
t o d p C d o C n p
o o o
r m b m a.
fD rfrt a w
000w
u. r' p o D fD i-n F-' n
O r• d ri O fD O F-' O
dw rtnaa
rt m Qo w D yr In r• rt
o cn r• N o c
y r• rt rt o u G
n ci w m w rn o rn rt
o rt H o a d o
m m do`
r• o a o a n o o
m rt rn
d d N m
N
rt uwi O N C
m o m rn m V m
p a n m r• n w
w r• w m o
d G r• cn
w oo rn rt
o G p m m
p o p G G
rr rn o r• r•
rt, N N H
ai H • p O
rt ' p rt rt
m rt w cn w
mC7 cn rn
G'
w r• o m o
p w m Fes-' n
art d aw m
r• o r• p
m m N m r• o
rt F-` rt p
o n rGr w°o w
m o rf d
a G E
r°t wv rt
rt m n
p rt r• P b
OV ' f G w C
o ' o
r• rt p
p m r• r; rt
o cn r• ri
rtb N N
N 10-'"d
N
d
p ri N ri t7 r•
a G G O r•
w
m w r irt
G a d n n rt
G o rt
rt K m w
m m '
a d
w dvO m
c o
w P, co G
r• rt rt rt
rt o w m r•
B m a
b
w o °•
rt rt p (D
w rt •
o a
w G
w
0o m
r
LTJ
c
H
rty
H
H
z
yH
Z
C'
9H
r
H
H
z
H
O Cn C7 H
CJ G G '
r1, d r•
rt r+, N m
w r• r•
rt p w
r• r• -
oho
rn o G
aG d E
0o G o r•
co a rs
rt m rt N
r•
wi p N
m
rwr G
r• m r•
m
N O
a w
a fD
r• M
G rt
ro
w °,
o m G
H
0o rt
o O
O n to
m x
t
r• v
Fh
0
n
z
LTJ
n
0
CrJ
d
H
H
z
w ate.
o d
rr
rt rt
o m
D G
rt
G r•
m
m w
o
d
00
w
00
h
m
m
N
rt
a
w
G
rt
0
n
r•
N
O
t
k
x
H
H
H
H
H
x
trJ
d
N
t7
n° w
rt
rt
0
N
G
rt
r•
0
C
t
L
n
H
w oq
rt ri
m m
n
o
F-' rt
H
rt m
r• o0
a
00
w
N
G
w
rt
r•
0
0
Fh
z
0
I
d
0
rt
0
G
h
fD
C
r•
rt
O
N
0
O
rt
OG
d
w
00
G
rt
N
0
V
ti
9
H
n
H
H
0
t7
r
H
z
V
{A,1
r}'• '�t��! �� 1 t at etF �.r
ti
•, t� 1 a. da.� t s, a v j r.* �a ,a
11
RESOLUTION N0.` -87
A'RESOLUTION OF.THE CITY COUNCIL'...
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING AGREEMENT REGARDING EVALUATION OF ."
NONPOINT SOURCE OF.WATER POLLUTION
WHEREAS, the San Francisco-Bay Water Control-.Board, in-carrying
out the Federal Clean Water Act, has established certain requirements for
local agencies within Alameda County for the preparation of a detailed .
proposal for evaluation of non-point source pollution'by June 1,,- 1988; and .
WHEREAS, the various local agencies propose to prepare a.combined
study with Alameda County as a lead agency; and
WHEREAS, this initial study is not to exceed $150,000; and
WHEREAS, ' the City of Dublin's pro-rata share is 1.17% based on
area and .population;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Dublin approves
this Joint Agreement Regarding Evaluation of Non-Point Source of Water
Pollution and authorizes Mayor to execute same.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of August, 1987.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
.,.�.1_..aillt.ts.t..a...,. :....u>..,u,ww..:.....v._..:Ya:_..;u-v.w...[�+GIA:]a,wti.a'rAi:i.L.'<eai�F'vitSekbt14C11t�".w+aw�.iu,LbltFU!'.unr'3Ywr.U/4G:.lSl.Siv-.s:'hr.:.uY..•M..n:i..Y..T..a....t.fr.;l...1_...f1:ki:42.LJL..4sw':sfi'_:GRi*Stw.Yii.-<t tLYaGNn:-aa.k. :Lrs..m—.. ...w... Y-r
AGREEMENT
` REGARDING EVALUATION OF NON-POINT SOURCE OF WATER POLLUTION
Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District,
a local public agency of the State of California:
Zone 7 of Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District, a local public agency of the State of California:
County of Alameda, a subdivision of the State of California;
City of Alameda, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Albany, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Berkeley, a municipality of ,the State of California;
City of Dublin, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Emeryville, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Fremont, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Hayward, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Livermore, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Newark, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Oakland, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Piedmont, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Pleasanton, a municipality of the State of California;
City .of San Leandro, a municipality of the State of California;
City of Union City, a municipality of the State of California;
AGREE this day of 1987, as follows:
RECITALS:
A. The San Francisco Bay Basin Water Quality Control Plan of the
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board requires that local
agencies in the County of Alameda (viz, the parties to this agreement)
shall prepare for review by said Regional Board a detailed proposal for
evaluation of non-point source pollution by June 1, 1988.
B. This agreement will provide for the allocation of responsibility
for the work and for distribution of the cost thereof.
- 1 -
iV3 6}i3a•vL.ty dwa.��i•:°ny: ,;c•.vx,gli.5. ;1 k�ffU:FdC4f'i.�nL'U ,, _ °iiYd .AUX,
AGREEMENT:
1. In accordance with the Water. Quality Control Plan for the San
Francisco Bay Basin (Basin Plan), the Alameda County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District (hereinafter District) is assuming a significant . .
coordination role in development of this program and shall undertake to secure
the services of a consultant in accordance with District procedures on selection
of professional consultants. ' The District's contract with the consultant will
contain a hold harmless and indemnity provision for the benefit of all parties
to this agreement.
2. A Task Force consisting of representatives of agencies specified
on Exhibit A hereto, so marked and made a part hereof, shall oversee and
direct the preparation by the consultant so engaged of the proposal men-
tioned in Recital A above.
3. The parties shall share in meeting the cost of the proposal, including
the consultant's fee and the necessary and reasonable cost incurred by the
District therein, in the proportions stated in the schedule thereof marked
"Exhibit B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. The indicated shares are
based on population and area of the respective jurisdictions as computed for
purposes of this agreement.
4. The total cost to be so apportioned shall not exceed $150,000.
5. This agreement will be effective as to signing parties upon the
execution of parties sharing 87 per cent or more of the apportioned cost.
District will thereupon proceed to secure the services of a consultant as
stated in paragraph 1 above. If execution is refused by one or more of the
balance of the named proposed parties hereto the share of such party or parties
will be met by the executing parties other than District or Zone 7 of Alameda
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (hereinafter Zone 7) in the
general proportion shown on Exhibit B or by such division as the executing
parties other than District and Zone 7 may determine and agree upon.
ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,
a political subdivision of the
APPROVED AS TO FORM: State of California
By:
County Counsel Chairman, Board of Supervisors
ATTEST: ZONE 7 OF ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,
a political subdivision of the
State of California
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
ATTEST:
Secretary, Board of Directors
_ 2 _
ALAMEDA COUNTY, 'a political
subdivision of the State of
APPROVED AS TO FORM: California
By:
County .Counsel Chairperson, Board of
Supervisors
ATTEST:
CITY OF ALAMEDA, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF ALBANY, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF BERKELEY, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney City Manager
ATTEST:
_ 3 _
...;ti7iGG�(^''•7R'+A' ."-•'"-.i#,.S77ot:C"�t "1�:a°'i^,L'flui4lRI.SW:TtWlY57GL'ilYVEXk6>3YL"kLelC�itGr7Ne'W. Yi .0'::Y�'1'."'WTL' •+'tC�E 1�.6^.;Ai !
CITY OF DUBLIN, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: . of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF EMERYVILLE, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF FREMONT, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
City
By
orney Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF HAYWARD, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
- 4 -
CITY OF LIVERMORE, a municipality '
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF NEWARK, ,a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney City Manager
ATTEST:
CITY OF PIEDMONT, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
- 5 -
w.�,��y.:.ti.^.iSieiti:Jk.'li'f�'°n-a-•.� .- ;GYR'+aiGx3r.YyLZ.•`:�-•ax.;yx....���7ns�-''8a4L6G••,.•. „yu-.••,• eid�'S'37^6i.ir+C°:L17iYSS ..w+3A::i`�,o— -x«rr
CITY OF PLEASANTON, a municipality
a APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By
City Attorney ay or
ATTEST:
CITY OF SAN LEANDRO, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF UNION CITY, a municipality
APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the State of California
By:
City Attorney Mayor
ATTEST:
_ 6 _
0
EXHIBIT A
TASK FORCE AGENCIES
. San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Zone 7 of Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
City of Berkeley
City of Dublin
City of Fremont
City of Hayward
City of Oakland
City of San Leandro
JM1A11
a
EXHIBIT B
SCHEDULE- OF COST SHARING PROPORTIONS.,
URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT PLAN
PROPORTIONAL
JURISDICTION SHARE
1. ALAMEDA 2.48
2. ALBANY 0.40
3. BERKELEY 3.11
4. DUBLIN 1.17
5. EMERYVILLE 0.20
6. FREMONT 8.52
7. HAYWARD 5.76
8. LIVERMORE . 2.70
9. NEWARK . 1.52
10. OAKLAND 11.90
11. PIEDMONT 0.38
12. PLEASANTON 2.23
13. SAN LEANDRO 2.42
14. UNION CITY 2.57
15 ALAMEDA COUNTY 4.64
16. ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD 45.00
CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
17. ZONE 7 OF ALAMEDA COUNTY 5.00
FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
JM1A5-12