HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.2 I580/SR Rd-Foothill RdCITY CLERK FILE # 800-30
AGENDA STATEMENT
CZTY COUNCZL MEETZNG DATE: October 17, 2000
SUBJECT:
Presentation of the Findings of the Project Study Report for the
1-580/San Ramon Road-Foothill Road Interchange Improvement
Report Prepared by: Lee S. Thompson, Public l/Forks Director
ATTACHMENT:
1)
2)
Project Study Report
Heidi Ouren of HQE, Inc., will make a brief presentation
at the Council meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the findings of the Project Study Report (PSR) and direct
Staff to proceed with the steps necessary for the continuation of
the preparation of the Project Report (PR) / Environmental
Documentation (ED) and Plans, 'Specifications and Estimates
(PS&E)
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
The estimated cost of the improvements proposed in the PSR is
$3.91 million, which includes the preparation of the PR/ED, PS&E,
construction, and construction administration costs. The next step
in acquiring Caltrans 'approval is the preparation of the PR/ED and
PS&E. There is sufficient monies in the 20% Set-Aside of the Tri-
Valley Traffic Impact Fees to fund half of the cost of preparing these
'two tasks. Staff anticipates that Pleasanton will fund the other half
of the cost consistent with the funding of the PSR and will seek
approval.
DESCRIPTION: The first step in acquiring approval from Caltrans in improving the
1-580/San Ramon Road-Foothill Road Interchange is the preparation of a Project Study Report. The City
hired HQE, Inc. to prepare this study, and the consultant .has recently completed the report. As stated in
the attached Project Study Report, this project proposes to modify the 1-580/San Ramon Road/Foothill
Road Interchange in order to eliminate weaving problems and improve traffic operations. The existing
San Ramon Road/I-580 Interchange is a four-quadrant cloverleaf interchange providing free flow
characteristics for all movements. The purpose of this project is to reconfigure the interchange to
eliminate two weaving areas: the westbound 1-580 diagonal off-ramp/northbound San Ramon Road
weave between the off-ramp and Dublin Boulevard; and the eastbound 1-580 diagonal off-
ramp/southbound Foothill Road weave between the off-ramp and Dublin Canyon Road.
COPIES TO:
g:\miscproj\I-580 SR RoadxAgst580-SanRamon PSR Presentation
Heidi Ouren, HQE
ITEM NO.
The proposed project will modify the interchange by realigning both the westbound and eastbound
diagonal off-ramps to tee intersections with San Ramon Road and Foothill Road and removing 2the
existing corresponding loop off-ramps in both directions. The proposed configuration will become a
standard partial cloverleaf'interchange as shown in the PSR.
Major features of the proposed project include:.
· Realignment of the westbound 1-580 off-ramp terminus to a tee intersection at San Ramon Road
and installation of a new traffic signal
· Realignment of the eastbound 1-580. off ramp terminus to a tee intersection at Foothill Road and
installation of a new traffic signal
· Removal of the westbound 1-580 to southbound San Ramon Road loop off-ramp
· Removal of the eastbound 1-580 to northbound San Ramon Road loop off-ramp
· Widening the westbound diagonal off-ramp to two lanes
· Widening the eastbound diagonal off-ramp to two lanes and providing a 400 meter auxiliary lane
· Landscaping of the San Ramon Road median between 1-580 and Dublin Boulevard
The estimated cost of these improvements is $3.91 million, which includes preliminary engineering,
design, construction, and construction administration costs. This PSR has been prepared at the request of
both the City of Dublin and City of Pleasanton, with the City of Dublin acting as the lead agency for this
effort. The PSR is funded through Tri-Valley Traffic Impact Fees allocated to each City for regional
transportation improvements. After completion of the PSR, the next tasks required by Caltrans are ~the
preparation of the PR/ED and PS&E.
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the findings of the Project Study Report and direct Staff to
proceed with the steps necessary to continue with the preparationof the PR/ED and PS&E.
04-ALA-580-KP 33.8/35.1
04257- 28480K
October 2000
PROJECT STUDY REPORT
In Alameda County
In the Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton
On the Route 580/San Ramon Road/Foothill Road Interchange
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
Arthur L. Dao, District Office Chief
APPROVED:
H. P. Hensley
Chief Deputy District Director
Date
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Ala-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1
2. BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................1
9. NEED AND PURPOSE .................................................................................................2
4. ALTERNATIVES ..........................................................................................................2
5. TRAFFIC AND ACCIDENT DATA ............................................................................9
6. SYSTEM PLANNING/RELATED PROJECTS ...........................................................8
7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .......................................................................................9
8. TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP) ............................................... 9
9. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT .............................................................................9
10. FUNDING / SCHEDULING .......................................................................................10
11. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT/OTHER AGREEMENTS ...................................... 11
12. PROJECT CONTACTS .............................................................................. ................12
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Existing Intersection Operations ...........................................................................4
Table 2 - Existing Weave Operations ...................................................................................4
Table 3 ~ 2025 Intersection Operations .................................................................................6
Table 4 - Accident Statistics .................................................................................................7
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Proposed Project Geometry
Attachment B - Project Cost Estimate
Attachment C -Right of Way Data Sheet
Attachment D - Draft Cooperative Agreement
04-ALA-580-KP 33.8/35.1
04257- 28480K
October 2000
This Project Study Report has been prepared under the direction of the following
registered civil engineer. The registered civil engineer attests to the technical information
contained herein and the engineering data upon which recommendations, conclusions,
and decisions are based.
Registered Civil Engineer
~ 0~o
Date
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-AIa-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
1. INTRODUCTION
This project proposes to modify the 1-580 / San Ramon Road / Foothill Road Interchange in
order to eliminate weaving problems and improve traffic operations. The existing San
Ramon Roada-580 Interchange is a four-quadrant cloverleaf (Caltrans Type L-10)
imerchange providing free flow characteristics for all movements. The purpose of the
project is to reconfigure the interchange to eliminate two weaving areas: the westbound 1-
580 diagonal off-ramp/northbound San Ramon Road weave between the off-ramp and
Dublin Boulevard; and the eastbound 1-580 diagonal off-ramp/southbound Foothill Road
weave between the off-ramp and Dublin Canyon Road.
The estimated cost of these improvements is $3.91 million, which includes preliminary
engineering, design, construction and construction administration costs. This Project Study
Report has been prepared at the request of both the City of Dublin and City of Pleasanton,
with City of Dublin acting as the lead agency for this effort. The PSR is being funded
through Tri-Valley Traffic Impact Fees allocated to each city for regional transportation
improvements.
2. BACKGROUND
In the vicinity of this interchange, 1-580 is an east-west route connecting Castro Valley to
the west and Dublin/Pleasanton to the east. It also serves as a connector between Rome 238
and Interstate Route 680. This interchange lies at the intersection of Interstate Rome 580,
San Ramon Road in the City of Dublin and Foothill Road in the City of Pleasanton. Office,
hotel and retail land uses mainly surround the interchange with a large shopping center in
the southeast quadrant. The proposed project is located within the city limits of both Dublin
and Pleasanton. Figure 1 shows the project Vicinity Map.
The existing interchange is a four-quadrant cloverleaf (Caltrans Type L-10) interchange
providing free flow characteristics for all movements. It is limited in its capacity because of
short weaving distances between loop ramps. It is also limited in the available weaving
distance for the 1-580 westbound to San Ramon Road northbound movement due to its close
proximity to the Dublin Boulevard/San Ramon Road intersection, causing operational
problems.
The existing configuration consists of eight single-lane ramps - four for each travel
direction. Both the westbound and eastbound travel directions include one diagonal off-
ramp, one loop off-ramp, one diagonal on-ramp, and one loop on-ramp. A collector-
distribmor (C-D) road connects the off-ramps with the on-ramps in each direction. The
bridge structure provides two through northbound lanes, one northbound to westbound on-
ramp lane, two through southbound lanes, and one southbound to eastbound on-ramp lane.
~- HQE, Inc. 1 10/09/00
WALNUT
CREEK
\1
L
PM 30.221
30.351 (CS)
LEANDR~~
)ANVILLE
"PM 21.316
21.317~~
21.539
21.540
~,,
I
PM 28.413 (CS)
28.270
Project
Site
PM 21.536
21.535
21.320
21.319
~Rd.
Dublin BIvd
LIVERMORE
PLEASANTON
· ';
.. -:>",,,L,Uvl;
~ iPM 13.219 (CS)l
-- 13.366
~_ ....
z ...'
_e ....
PM 18.286
18.219 (CS)
Tesla Rd
1-580 & San Ramon/Foothill Interchange
Vicinity Map
Figure
1
c:\project\2000\OOO23\fig 1 .fh9
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Ala-580-KP 33.8/35.1
EA 28480K
3. NEED AND PURPOSE
The short weaving distances mentioned above increase delays during the peak hours and
create potential operational problems. The proposed project will result in elimination of all
weaving movements along San Ramon Road, Foothill Road, and along the collector-
distributor roads, thus improving overall traffic operations. The proposed improvements
will also provide for better traffic management via new intersections, traffic signals and
signal coordination.
4. ALTERNATIVES
There are two altematives being considered for this project, a build altemative (Proposed
Project) and a No Build alternative. Related projects that are proposed in the area are
discussed in section 6. SYSTEM PLANNING and are assumed to be in operation prior to
the construction of this project.
Proposed Project
The proposed project will modify the interchange by realigning both the westbound and
eastbound diagonal off-ramps to a tee intersection with San Ramon Road/Foothill Road and
removing the existing loop off-ramps in both directions. The proposed configuration is a
standard partial cloverleaf (Caltrans Type L-9) interchange as shown in Attachment A. No
right of way acquisition will be required for the proposed project and no major utility
relocations will occur.
Major features of the proposed project include:
· Realignment of the westbound 1-580 off ramp terminus to a tee intersection at San
Ramon Road and installation of a new signal;
· Realignment of the eastbound 1-580 off ramp terminus to a tee intersection at Foothill
Road (San Ramon Road) and installation of a new signal;
· Removal ofwestbound 1-580 to southbound San Ramon Road loop off-ramp;
· Removal of eastbound 1-580 to northbound San Ramon Road loop off-ramp;
· Widening the westbound diagonal off-ramp to two lanes; and
· Widening the eastbound diagonal off-ramp to two lanes and providing a 400 m auxiliary
lane.
Non-Standard Features
The proposed project will have one mandatory and four advisory non-standard features. The
mandatory superelevation rate of 12% will not be provided at the westbound and eastbound
off ramp termini. The advisory non-standard features are as follows:
HQE, Inc. 2 10/09/00
I~580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Ala-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
1. Superelevation runoff lengths less than required at both westbound and eastbound off-
ramp termini and the westbound loop on-ramp.
2. Several locations will not provide 2/3 rimoff on the tangent and 1/3 within the curve.
3. The eastbound off-ramp will have a vertical curve length less than the 60 m minimum
required.
4. The westbound off-ramp will connect to San Ramon Road where the grade is greater
than 4%.
Design exception fact sheets have been prepared and reviewed by Gordon Brown, Design
Reviewer for Design and Local Programs.
No Build Alternative
No modifications to the existing interchange would be made. The configuration will remain
as a full cloverleaf (Caltrans Type L-10) interchange.
Rejected Alternative
Since the purpose of the project is to eliminate weaving along the arterial, the only other
build alternative that will meet the purpose and need would require creation of a non-
standard interchange type. The weaving areas discussed earlier could be eliminated by
removing the diagonal off-ramps in each direction and bringing the existing loop off-ramps
to a tee (signalized) intersection at the arterial (San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd.) This altemative
was not considered practical for the following reasons:
The weaving sections on the C-D road between the existing loop on/off ramps currently
operate a LOS F during the peak periods. Adding the diagonal off-ramp traffic to these
areas would only exacerbate this problem.
· A substantial portion of the loop off-ramps would need to be widened to provide
adequate storage for vehicles destined in both the noah- and southbound directions.
· A non-standard interchange type would be created, potentially causing driver confusion.
5. TRAFFIC AND ACCIDENT DATA
Following is a summary of the findings in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report prepared
by CCS Planning and Engineering dated September, 2000. Intersection and weaving Level
of Service (LOS) are shown for Existing, Future (2025) No Build and Future (2025)
Proposed Project conditions. The proposed project geometry is shown in Attachment A.
Because the purpose of this project is to eliminate weaving on the arterial (San Ramon
Road/Foothill Road) crossing 1-580, no freeway or ramp merge/diverge operations are
summarized in this document. Technical details of those elements can be found in the
Traffic Operations Analysis Report referenced above.
HQE, Inc. 3 10/09/00
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Ala-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
A. Existing Conditions
1. Intersection Operations
Intersection LOS was calculated for the existing signalized intersections at San Ramon
Road/Dublin Boulevard and Foothill Road/Dublin Canyon Road/Canyon Way using the
existing average peak hour volumes shown in Figure 2. As shown in Table 1 below,
both intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS during the peak hours.
Table 1
Existing Intersection Operations
AM Peak Hour
Intersection LOS
1. San Ramon Road & Dublin Blvd C
2. Foothill Road & Canyon Way C
Source: Traffic Operations Analysis, CCS Planning & Engineering, September, 2000
PM Peak Hour
LOS
D
D
2. Weaving Operations
Weaving operations were analyzed using the "Leisch Method" from Chapter 5 of the
1995 Highway Design Manual. Table 2 compares the A.M. and P.M. peak hour level of
service (LOS) along the weaving areas. The "Weaving" column indicates the LOS of
the vehicles conducting the weaving movement. The "Overall" column indicates the
LOS of the entire roadway encompassing the weaving segment.
Table 2
Existing Weave Operations
PM Peak LOS
AM Peak LOS
Location Weaving Overall Weaving Overall
1. NB San Ramon Rd between WB off-ramp F* D F* B
and Dublin Blvd.
2. NB San Ramon Rd between EB loop off- D A E* C
ramp and WB 'loop on-ramp
3. SB Foothill Rd between WB loop off-ramp D B D A
and EB loop on-ramp
4. SB Foothill Rd between EB off-ramp and E* B E* B
Canyon Way/Dublin Canyon Rd
5. WB 1-580 C-D road between WB 1-580 E* A F* C
loop on-ramp and WB 1-580 loop off-ramp
6. EB 1-580 C-D road between EB 1-580 loop F* D F* C
on-ramp and EB 1-580 loop off-ramp
*Weaving volume exceeds maximum
Source; Traffic Operations Analysis, CCS Planning & Engineering, September, 2000
__ HQE, Inc. 4 10/09/00
N
177,000 (8 el~
.......... ~ 7,979(8,706)
6,958(6,236)
Dublin
cococo
co u~ r- }'- 75<221)
e4 -- eq '~- 143(186)
~2 ~ ~ r479(940)
Dublin Blvd.
186(196)-f~ ~ ~ ~'
176(216)--~ ~' ~'~'
688(273)-~ ~, ,t c~ g
'-
2 ~,~
~'~ ~. 8o(~oo)
Oooco
~ ~ ~ r S(31)
Dublin Canyon Wy
389(454)~ ~ ~ ~
75(74)~ ~ ~
0(346)~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-- J_JLL_ COS
178,000 (8 ~]
:-
Leftend
] C) study Intersections
58(187) AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes "
Figure
1-580 & San Ramon/Foothill Interchange
2
2000 Existing
Peak Hour Volumes
cfiprojectx2000\00023\~g3.fh9
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Aia-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
As shown in Table 2 above, peak hour traffic on San Ramon Road in the vicinity of the
1-580/San Ramon Road/Foothill Road Project is at the capacity of the existing cloverleaf
interchange. In particular, five of the six weaving sections at the interchange operate at
LOS E or F during one or both peak hours. Deficient weaving operations occur on
northbound San Ramon Road noah of the westbound diagonal off-ramp, southbound
Foothill Road south of the eastbound off-ramp, on northbound San Ramon Road
between the westbound on-ramp and eastbound off-ramp, and on both of the collector-
distributor (C-D) roads paralleling 1-580.
The purpose of the project is to eliminate weaving between vehicles traveling
northbound on San Ramon Road and those entering from the westbound off-ramp.
There are approximately 2800 vph in the a.m. peak hour and 3500 vph in the p.m. peak
hour using this short 140 m weaving section between the off-ramp and Dublin
Boulevard. Similarly, on the south side of the interchange, there are approximately 2600
vph in the a.m. peak hour and 2800 vph in the p.m. peak hour using the available 1 !0 m
weaving section on southbound Foothill Road between the eastbound off-ramp and
Canyon Way. The proposed project will not only eliminate these local arterial weaving
sections, but will have the added benefit of eliminating all weaving sections within the
interchange.
B. Future Conditions (2025)
The Tri-Valley Transportation Model was applied to provide A.M. and P.M. peak hour
traffic volumes for 2025 conditions. The traffic generated by the proposed West Dublin
Bart Station has been included in the 2025 projections. Figures 3 and 4 show the projected
volumes for the No Build and Proposed Project. Future growth will increase peak hour
traffic demands by an average of 12% by 2025. These traffic increases will cause increased
congestion during peak periods. It should be noted that the proposed project does not have a
direct effect on mainline traffic and does not propose to remedy existing or future mainline
congestion.
1. Intersection Operations
Future intersection operations were evaluated using the same 1994 HCM Operations
methodology as the existing conditions analysis. For purposes of this comparative
analysis, existing lane geometries and signal phasing were assumed at the two existing
intersections for the No Build scenario. However, the two existing intersections were
assumed to be interconnected and coordinated with the two proposed ramp intersections
for the Proposed Project scenario. In addition, both scenarios assume that the City of
Pleasanton widening project shown in Attachment A will be constructed and operational.
~ HQE, Inc. 5 10/09/00
N
Dublin
~ v ~L. 97(280)
O')T-O
co ,- co 4-175(223)
~2 ~, L4, ~-454(91a)
Dublin Blvd.
301 (284)--'~ ~ ~ r·
273(250)-+ o= 7o '~ ~
r,O r-,- {:~
81 2(303)-~ ~_ ~' 5 ~'
(O I'- C,I
I'--
4 I~
co ~o k. 205(1077)
~ ~.~
· - o ~ ~ ~8(2~1)
~ ~ ~ ~ 20(~2)
Dublin Canyon Wy.
510(667)~ ~ ~ ~
226(145)~ ~ ~ ~
419(559)~ ~ S G
O ~ ~
-- ccs
ADT: 218,200 (8 ~]
Leqend
10 Study Intersections
58(187) AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes
1-580 & San Ramon/Foothill Interchange Figure
2025 Projected
Peak Hour Volumes 3
No Project
c:\project~2000\OOO23\~g5-fh
Cq~C',I
o~ ,- o ~,- 97(280)
co ,-co ~--175(223)
~2 ~, ~ ~454(918)
Dublin Blvd.
301(284)~ ~ ~ ~ ~
273(250)~ ~
81 2(303)~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,,.r~~~,_ 1196(1211) · -,~ 1099(2150)
O
E
n-
31
1288(1111)~ ~__,~
1-580 EB off ramp
679(620 -/'f~_~'q'
840(987) -~ ~
o
o
. '*--8735(9495)
6936(7582)--~
:. Dublin
\
'XDT: 214,033 {8
O
:>,
r-'
o
4 ~,~-~,
e ~ k_ 205(1077)
~ e ~ ~ ~8(2~)
~ ~ ~ F 20(82}
Dublin Canyon Wy
510(667)~ ~ ~ ~
226(145)~ ~ ~
419(559)~ ~ 5~
Leqend
]'0 Study Intersections
58(187) AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes
1-580 & San Ramon/Foothill Interchange Figure
2025 Projected
Peak Hour Volumes 4
with Project
c:\project~OOO\OOO23\~g6.fh9
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothiil Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-AIa-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
Table 3
2025 Intersection Operations
Intersection
1. San Ramon Road & Dublin Boulevard
2. San Ramon Road & 1-580 WB Ramps
3. Foothill Road & 1-580 EB Ramps
4. Foothill Road & Canyon Way
2025 AM(PM) 2025 AM(PM)
Peak Hour LOS Peak Hour LOS
No Build Proposed
Project
C(D) C(C)
- B(C)
- B(B)
C(E) *C(D)
*Assumes traffic mitigation improvements proposed by City of Pleasanton are constructed. Those intersection
improvements are not included in the cost of this project but will be implemented in a separate project.
Source: Traffic Operations Analysis, CCS Planning & Engineering, September, 2000
Acceptable traffic operations, as shown in Table 3, will be provided at all four study
intersections (the two existing intersections adjacent to the interchange and the two
proposed signals at the off-ramps) with the proposed project geometry and proper signal
coordination. It is assumed that signal interconnect between all four signals will be
provided.
2. Weaving Operations
The proposed project shown in Attachment A will provide traffic signal control for off-
ramp traffic and will eliminate all of the existing weaving sections at the interchange,
including the two collector-distributor roads, northbound San Ramon Road north of 1-
580 and southbound Foothill Road south of 1-580. This will greatly improve overall
operation of the interchange.
C. Accident Data
Accident data for the interchange area for the three-year period from October 1, 1996 to
September 30, 1999 was obtained from Caltrans TASAS Table B data and is summarized in
Table 4. Intersection accident data was also obtained from the Cities of Dublin and
Pleasanton for the study areas located in each jurisdiction. The accident information includes
the numbers of fatal (F), fatal plus injury (F+I) and total (TOT) accidents on the study area
freeway, ramps and at intersections. The actual rates for the 1-580/San Ramon Road project
area are compared with statewide averages for similar facilities in urban areas.
-- HQE, Inc, 6 10/09/00
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Ala-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
Table 4
Accident Statistics
Three Year Totals
Actual Rates
(per million
Location No. of Accidents vehicle miles)
(Postmile) F I F+I ]TOT F I F+I I TOT
Average Rates
(per million
vehicle miles)
F+I I TOT
A. FREEWAY MAINLINE/RAMPS (October 1, 1996 to September 30, 1999)
WB 1-580 (21.0 - 22.0) 0 8 8 0.000 0.09 0.26 0.005 0.32 0.92
EB 1-580 (21.0 - 22.0) 0 24 24 0.000 0.26 0.85 0.005 0.32 0.92
WB off-ramp to NB San
0 1 4 0.000 0.11 0.45 0.006 0.36 0.90
Ramon (21.316)
WB off-ramp to SB San
0 1 1 0.000 0.23 0.23 0.020 0.33 1.20
Ramon Road (21.317)
EB on-ramp from NB San
0 0 2 0.000 0.00 0.37 0.004 0.23 0.60
Ramon Road (21.319)
EB on-ramp form SB San
0 1 4 0.000 0.12 0.47 0.002 0.27 0.70
Ramon Road (21.320)
EB off-ramp to SB San
0 3 6 0.000 0.44 0.88 0.006 0.36 0.90
Ramon Road (21.535)
EB off-ramp to NB San
0 2 4 0.000 0.25 0.50 0.020 0.33 1.20
Ramon Road (21.536)
WB on-ramp from SB San 0 2 3 0.000 0.24 0.37 0.004 0.23 0.60
Ramon Road (21.539)
WB on-ramp from NB San
0 3 6 0.000 0.66 1.32 0.002 0.27 0.70
Ramon Road (21.540)
B. INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ~,2
0.77 0.003 0.22 0.54
0.41 0.003 0.22 0.54
San Ramon Rd/Dublin Blvd ~ n/a n/a 53 n/a n/a
Foothill Rd/Canyon Way 2 n/a n/a 30 n/a n/a
x. xx = Actual rate is higher than average rate.
~ Three year period from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1999
2 Three year period from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1998
No fatalities were reported on freeway segments, freeway ramps or intersections during the
three-year analysis periods. However, the total accident rates in the study area are higher
than statewide averages at two locations: 1) on the westbound on-ramp from northbound San
Ramon Road and 2) at the San Ramon Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection. A description of
accidents occurring at those two locations is summarized below. The installation of two new
signals and elimination of weaving areas proposed by this project should serve to decrease
.-- HQE, Inc. 7 10/09/00
1-580/San Ramon RdfFoothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Ala-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
the accident rates at these two locations 'by slowing down traffic and substantially decreasing
conflict areas.
There were a total of six accidents at the westbound loop on ramp from northbound San
Ramon Road) during the three-year period. A majority of those involved speeding violations
(67%) and occurred on a wet road surface (67%). Four of the six accidents involved single
vehicles, and of those 75% were speeding while it was raining and the road surface was wet.
All four of the single vehicle accidents went off the ramp to the driver's right. The remaining
two accidents involved two vehicles, one being a rear end collision involving speeding during
the P.M. peak hour on a weekday.
The City of Dublin reported 53 accidents at the intersection of San Ramon Road/Dublin
Boulevard from 1997 to 1999. In 1997, 28 total accidents occurred and dropped to 10 in
1998. Of those 38 reported incidents, 31% were rear-end collisions and 77% occurred during
the daylight hours. No detail data is available for 1999. The City will continue to monitor
and evaluate the accident rates at this intersection.
6. SYSTEM PLANNING/RELATED PROJECTS
The City of Dublin has submitted this project to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC) for inclusion in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program
(FTIP) for regional planning purposes only. No funding elements are being requested at this
A change in access control request will need to be submitted to and approved by FHWA due
to the elimination of the two existing loop off-ramps. FHWA will also review and concur
with this PSR prior to Caltrans final approval.
Related Projects
A Ramp Metering and HOV Bypass Project Study Report (PSR) was prepared by Caltrans
in December 1999 (CU-EA 4373-15105K). That PSR proposes to install and implement the
ramp metering system in the westbound direction from the 1-580/San Ramon/Foothill Rd
Interchange easterly to the 1-580/Tassajara Road Interchange. The installation of ramp
metering at both the diagonal and loop on-ramps at the 1-580/San Ramon/Foothill Road
Interchange will be constructed with that project. Construction is anticipated to begin in
December 2001.
The City of Pleasanton, via traffic impact mitigations required of developers, will construct
a project to widen northbound Foothill Road between Deodor Way and the 1-580 eastbound
diagonal on-ramp. That project will conform to the south of the proposed project and will
include widening of the eastbound on-ramp to two lanes. The on-ramp will then merge to
one lane prior to the gore area. It is also anticipated that ramp metering will be installed and
the widening will be constructed prior to the proposed project.
,I~ HQE, Inc. 8 10/09/00
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Ala-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
The City of Pleasanton is also in the process of preparing an environmental document for a
Smart Corridor project in this area. It involves revising the signal system to connect and
communicate with MTC and Caltrans systems, as well as the fiberoptics in the BART
corridor. Closed circuit television (CCTV), changeable message signs (CMS) and other
operations systems are also proposed at major arterials and various interchanges in the
corridor. Implementation of the Traffic Operations Systems (TOS) project will be not
precluded by this project.
Finally, the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) is in the process of planning a station
in the median of 1-580 between the 1-580/1-680 interchange and the 1-580/San Ramon
Road/Foothill Road interchange. As stated in the traffic section of this report, the traffic
generated by the proposed West Dublin BART Station has been included in the 2025
projections for this project. There is also the potential that BART will propose construction
of an emergency egress stairway in the median up to the San Ramon/Foothill overcrossing
structure. This will not impact the proposed project, however, because there is no structure
work proposed.
7. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
An Initial Site Assessment (ISA) was prepared in May, 2000. With the exception of
additional studies for aerial deposited lead, there were no potential hazardous materials
found in the immediate project footprint. The aerial deposited lead investigations will be
performed during the PS&E phase of the project prior to construction excavations.
8. TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP)
A stage construction/traffic-handling plan will be prepared during the PS&E phase of the
project to minimize traffic delays' and ensure safe operations during construction. It is
anticipated that traditional traffic handling practices will be sufficient for this project.
9. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
A Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report (PEAR) was prepared in August, 2000. It
indicated that the following studies will need to be prepared during the Project Report phase
in order to support a Categorical Exemption/Exclusion (NEPA/CEQA):
Air Quality
A qualitative air quality study will need to be prepared to evaluate project conformity
with the State Implementation Plan (SIP).
~ HQE, Inc. 9 10/09/00
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Aia-580-KP 33. 8/35. 1
EA 28480K
Biological Resources
A Natural Environment Study Report (NESR) should be prepared due to the proximity
of Dublin Creek, which is habitat for the federally threatened California red-legged frog.
Coordination with USFWS and preventative measures will be required to ensure that
runoff from the project area during construction does not introduce sediment and
contamination into the Dublin Creek. An appropriate Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan will also be implemented during construction to control sedimentation, erosion and
other pollutants.
Cultural Resources
Technical studies addressing cultural resources - an Archaeological Survey Report
(ASR) and Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) will need to be prepared for this
project and an Area of Potential Effect (APE) must be prepared in coordination with
Caltrans and FHWA. There is one potential historic property adjacent to Dublin Canyon
Road, west of the interchange that should be evaluated and possibly included in an
architectural APE.
Noise
An environmental noise analysis should be conducted for this project to address
potential for noise increases for offices, hotels and residences in the southwest and
northeast quadrants of the project.
At this time, the appropriate environmental document for this project appears to be a
Categorical Exemption (CE) under CEQA and Categorical Exclusion under NEPA with the
above listed backup studies to show whether there will be any significant impacts to
endangered species, cultural resources and impacts tiom noise.
10. FUNDING / SCHEDULING
This project is 100% locally funded with regional traffic impact fees collected by the Tri-
Valley Transportation Council for the Cities of Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, San Ramon,
Danville and the counties of Alameda and Contra Costa. Each jurisdiction is allocated a
portion of the collected fees to improve facilities within their jurisdiction. The Cities of
Dublin and Pleasanton will jointly fund this project using the 20% portion of these fees
collected within their jurisdictions. The following summarizes the remaining anticipated
costs associated with the project, including engineering and construction administration
costs.
-- HQE, Inc. 10 10/09/00
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Ala-580-KP 33.8/35. 1
EA 28480K
Project Report/Environmental Document
Plans, Specifications & Estimate
Right of Way and Utilities
Construction Phase:
Roadway Items
Structures Items
Construction Administration @ 10%
Subtotal Construction Phase
Total Project Costs (2000 Dollars)
$161,000
$339,000
$0
$3,099,000
$0
$310,000
$3,409,000
$3,909~000
The following project schedule is anticipated:
Final Project Study Report
Final Project Report/Environmental Document
Final Plans, Specifications, & Estimate
Right of Way Certification
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
October 2000
June 2001
June 2002
June 2002
September 2002
August 2003
11. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT/OTHER AGREEMENTS
A Cooperative Agreement will be prepared between Caltrans and the City of Dublin
covering the design and construction phases of this project. Under this agreement, the City
will be responsible for preparation of the Project Report/Environmental Document, the
Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) and award and administration of the construction
contract. Caltrans will provide design oversight for all phases of the project. The Draft
Cooperative Agreement has been prepared and is included in Attachment D.
A separate agreement will be executed between the City of Dublin and City of Pleasanton
since the project will be jointly funded by both cities. Both City Councils must approve this
Project Study Report prior to programming subsequent phases.
A signal maintenance agreement will be required between the cities and Caltrans. At this
time it is assumed that Caltrans will be responsible for operation and maintenance of the two
proposed signals. A maintenance agreement covering landscaping, irrigation, and other
roadway features will also be required. The respective maintenance responsibilities of each
party will be determined during later phases of the project.
-- HQE, Inc. 11 10/09/00
..~~
~:,TY OF DUDLIN
i;C CIVIC PLAZA
~}..'iLIN, CA 9~t568
· .~.!., INC.
~II6 N. MAIN STREET. SUITE K
~A NUT CREEK, CA 94596
.....
;'~"~ LAYouT
SHEET 2 OF 3
PROPOSED PROJECT
SCALE I= I000
::
"'
· ',~:? ~
..(';
· ~
:..;....,; '.: .,"'-....:..~:~: . ,~.,,
":: ~:""':' '.~i: '~'...:~':~'.~ '~"'
· :.'?',
:..~ . .
::: . ...., .-.-. .......,-
.... -..,.~, .:~
:t, "" t · ' ' wJ'( :, "';' '
..',.. 'i,'~,i ,,,. .. ~
'" ' """"ll , , ' '
i':,~"'"~'.. "'
....: · ,., .... . ... .....
,~ · . ......,. ,..,~,~,..
I '~":"'~";' .."""':"='.'' ':: '''''''''''''''~'' "
~!"~;;~ . ,'. .,.:.:~;!,....; ~]..... :.:. ,..:.... ........:'.....
! ~i!:i ::.:,~.!".' .:.'.- , ..: ;..~"""".'~i:!!! :: .. "i;::;."~:..~'''!'.=~'.'''''. ~:,.
--I ~i'. '~.; ,'. ....."':' "'. :...'~, .' :~.."'.~.,.......~... ............, \, ~,.'~,'.~ ~-' ~
,~! ~ ,;.." ". ,.!.'., '.:..!.':..: '...:: ~:~!,....'.. : .,:.,' ,. ~. 'i:'~:!.. .".... ::-.":i. '.'..., .. ;'.",.~
._,'.-; ~., - · .. ....~:' .:.-~.:.' ....' . ,' ".:' ,..' ""...'7"' "!':.::.:'~" · :,':.'....: ...':. '.'.,'.. "~: ~ .-=.. ~
· ' . ":::::'-:-':':~ .......~' ~,.~ . :.~:~:~"":~i""~::--:.-~'
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET ~
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 2
~ 42 'j ~ ~ ~8 ~0 E EINE
- -' · ~ 2. :: ~>: =~;:;~' ' ~ ~ ' -: -: ~:'2
· .], -~,: ':'" .'- .~.. XXX X
~' =!' ~;,~ ~ ~ 't :.].~ "'-.' .' '~ . ,
~ -: · -,
~:;~:t' , -..:.., ,
"'~' ~ :~=i~;~'~
-..:.,,. . - , :---,{,.:
~' ?v. ',
~ :: ;,:. ~'C; .:--'~"'~'-'-'-': ...,=..
=;: :,' .. ,.~;~f'~-~ '. ,..~.
~:', zv-. ...-,
-~..
: ....--,, -?..
.' ~/j~ .
--~:.:,-....
.... -.=-.
..: -; .? ~-., .
; .':. ':::'~
; ,'i:
e. tric
REGiSTEREO CIVIL ENGINEER
! ;~: ~UBLIN
ES E8 ON-RAMp
LOL
R/W ES ETW
1.0~ I,m , ' -, 7.8 ,, 6.7 T. 8
~, 3.6 2.4
~ 5X 2Z 2X
I r.": ..................... ==~
"HM" LINE
San Ramon Road/Foothill Road
etric
CITY OF DUBLIN
I00 CIVIC PLAZA
DUBLIN, CA 94568
HOE, INC.
2116 N. MAIN STREET, SUITE K
NALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
LOL
ETW ETW ES R/W
Ex,sT Es LANES '/ /
E S '
D 14.4 (MINI
.................. I
"MSM" LINE
Eastbound 1-880
"HSIM" LINE
ES ETW LOL
I ,I, !I ~ 3.6 3 ./W
IN)
PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION TO BE ~"
DETERMINED DURING PS&E PHASE
CSEE NOTE r~ "H$1M" LINE
Eastbound Off-Ramp
R/W ES ETW
. vAH,Es~:; , ~;;, ~ ..s., ._3.6o ~.,~ ET~ ~ Es w. oN:RAM~
~ 5X 3, 6 TO 0 / ~j_'
. ~v~B~°~sov2~,~s"
O~ ~S 2Z & VAR I ES
__ _
"HNAM" LINE
Wastbound Off-Ramp
ES LOL ETW ES
-~ 2.4 3.6 & 1.2I
I VAR I ES ~ 5X &
· VAR I ES3'-
NOTES:
I. THE FOLLOWING PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTIONS (EXISTING)
WERE ASSUMED FOR COST ESTIMATINC PURPOSES.
ARTERIALS AND RAMPS
I00 mm AC (A)
200 m CT8
275 rrra AS (4)
I.-580 AUXILIARy LANE
250 rim PCC
135 rrm CT8
150 rrrn AS (4)
"HN3M" LINE
Westbound Loop On-Ramp
1-580/SAN RAMON RD/FOOTHILL RD
INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT STUDY REPORT
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
NOT TO SCALE
0'4257 28480K
............. : ........... .......................... ........;.....,..! ......................: ........! ~....:....~ .....":"~/, '="°Y y,
.......... : ..... .......~ ~""'LX"'" ' ....~" ': ' '; 'i" '~ ' '~ ' "~'~ : ' ~ ~ 7
! :7"'~ ...........!"i ~';, ..........:'7:: .........!"""'C :'~ ""'T":"'~ ............. :"- s ' :, -~ .........F'';''s''~ ~' 'Y"i":"'~'
........................................ :"- ...........................................~ "'~""'~"':"":; ..........~'' 5' '+' 7"'~ ..........;r""~" s' ': "~""~"" F":" """"'=""
:;";v ""';";:"~E~:'~"';""";""'~"~ :f ........?"'::""'4 ~ ~"'f
.... :....>. :..~....~ ...:....~.....;....: ..................L~ ...' ·:: --;-.-.t--;..-~ 4 ~:-----~--4.---~----: ;-- ':....L ...~:....:~....~.....,... :: ....~ ..........~ .......~ .........e ......z--?f:: ~-~ ----~.--~--.-~-..-~----s- --'-
........ ,....:...., .... ..... ........,...., .................:..,..,..,,. =============================================
, ....... IOO CIVIC PLAZA
. . DUBLIN, CA ~4568
...................................... ~ ......~ .......................:.-=-..;..,.,--.--:.--~~...::~. . " ..
· - · ;R=IIO~ :. : ' , : : ~ : ~ ; : . : : ~ALNUT CREEK, CA ~45~6
'E ""."" . ....::""':"' 'Y".' "'}' "T""~ .......T' '~' 'P":""~ .....~' '.""="'E""F" ~.~::
:: ..... ~ ...........~ : : '- ~.-~ ~-..-E-'---D-- ~-~ ;---'f-.--~'---f--' ':--"-~- ~ ;---f----F
.-.U.-.-. ~--t-.~----~-..-f....~----b-~---4----~~ ~----*~----D-.-~--.-~.--.~ .........~--~----~
· s=,s ........c-.-.2..--:. ....t--..L.-~----~ .~ :--~ ..........t.-.: f.-:--~---.-:...-4--:--2~....;....L..~. ~ ~ ~..~ .......~,. ~
..... ........ .......t., ,.=.-..;.44...t..t--'.... 4., ...:
~ ~ ~ AXISZOF:RdTAf~Ofi=~pRbFILE~GRADE; ' ~ E ~ j
7 ~ .... F' "':""'F"'~ ~ ':
....... '-'/"; .......... ~"";:"'t""F""D"",""'~
..,..-~----~-~"--~--~.~-, ......;--,--~---D--.~--.-~-4---~ '- ~:: , '; ~ ~'~' ~ 'l
, ; , , : ; · .
..... :"": .......... :""~""':"":""~ ...... LT ~={: dj'~ ...... / . ~ ~ ~ : ~ , : : ~ ', : E :: : ] :
,-: ........~ 4- =:----;-.--~ ' ' ~ : '
,,: ...............
....... =--'s -:- , :- '-:"--'r .....
..... '~:: ~':- .,L.,,L
'= .........................~ ............F" T"'7""~ ..........t"' :""?"":
. - ............- .....sup~-v~,~moN ~m,~..,-.~
........ , ........: ................,...
............................................. ;--..~....,:...-:----:----: ........;....! ..........:....T....U...r...r...:
~ ~ ~ _ ..............:.._._~ aez ............ L 5 '
' ...~ "'T]"{"'Z~ZXZ4XZZ': "7"}"X].'ZX;.ZZZE...]/"}""'y'7'7}' .::: . , , . ,: . :"'"/;""T "'. ~'; .................*""?""~ '1:;'5'8to7 S'A'N":~R'A'M'ON* "RDTFO'OTHI~L':RD':"'
' "PROFILE .......................... ;- ~"""'~":'; ?""""" "IN:TERCHAN~GE'~"IMPROVEMENTS'
'7: ..............~"". "';"' '?""E, '~ ........... . '~ ........v"":-',~.;~ L',:~E'; ...............................~" ~ .........: ;: ........t .........~ ........T""Y"FP;R O'a'E'C'~' 8'T'0'~'Y RE'~'~'R'T: "'F : ......
4 {" D' }"}"'; ~ ~- ~ ·; : { -~.. e,.-::.- ES~BOQND~OFF-~AMP~ ...... ~. ;' T : ': , ""3 ..... : ," "} .....~" ~ "c' '" "F"";"'C' ';': ;: .....:" ":
SCALE: 1:500 H ,
............................................................................................. h-~o,-v ......................................Z, .:....L ........~-~: .......; ............~---:: ............WESTBOUND: -OFF; 'R'AMP'-PROFILE ~ .......L,......
' : : : : :
250 +20 +40 ,60 +80 25 +20 ,40 +60 +80 252 +20 +40 +60 +80 253 +20
1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange
Project Study Report
04-Aia-580-KP 33.8/35. 1
EA 28480K
12. PROJECT CONTACTS
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza,
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 94568
City of Pleasanton
200 Old Bemal Ave.
P.O. Box 520
Pleasanton, CA 94566
FHWA
980 9th Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Caltrans
111 Grand Ave.
P.O. Box 23660
Oakland, CA 94623
HQE Inc.
360 22nd Street, Suite 700
Oakland, CA 94612
CCS Planning & Engineering
1440 Broadway, Suite 402
Oakland, CA 94612
Ferd Del Rosado
Phil Grubstick
Bill van Gelder
R.C. Slovensky
Rubin Woo
May C. Kung
Gordon Brown
HQ Local Programs
Tom Bickford
R/W Engineer
Thong Nguyen
Traffic/Planning
Dennis Radel
Environmental Planning
Heidi Ouren
Project Manager
Chwen Siripoconant
Traffic Operations
Phone: 925-833-6637
Fax: 925-829-9248
Phone: 925-935-5675
Phone: 925-931-5666
Phone: 916-498-5774
Phone: 510-286-5086
Fax: 510-286-5122
Phone: 510-286-5094
Fax: 510-286-5122
Phone: 510-622-5932
Phone: 510-286-5246
Fax: 510-286-5366
Phone: 510-622-5488
Phone: 510-286-6214
Phone: 510-763-4895
Fax: 510-763-5896
Phone: 510-267-1800
Fax: 510-267-1807
HQE, Inc. 12 10/09/00
~ V~32 '~h ' " ' , : : ~.: ........~ ~" '~""~""~""':"":""'~ ..........: CITY OF DUBLIN
............ , ..........- .........~ ..................................' ...........................::' : ......: .....I00 CIVIC PLAZA
~ .....~ ........: : ~:: ': . ..........~ ...........E.. ~ ....: ........%----: DUBLIN, CA 94568
.......................... ~ ............~ : ' ~ ~ ""E""~"" ~ ' 'E"":'" ":""~ .........~"":"":""': ~ ' HOE, INC.
:~: ~:. :...:. '::::: '- + :-.~ .........~ ~ : ~ ......~.....~ -~ , ~ ~ -~,-..,.-...~ ......:+-~ ~ ~ .......~,..,: ~~ ..........~- :,-..~ ...~-..-:
...............
..... I------~--..:-...:-.--~ .......:~.. .~....:....~ ........~~ ..........:...,.',...;.....~.....~ ..~.....: ..........; ..........2.....'... ~ .........' .......~ ...................~--..: ...............~...,- ............ ~....~...~ ....:,...~....:. ~ALNUT CREEK, CA94596
+~ I ~ ~ ' , . . : . : : :
+,~ .-, .:....,:...:...,: , , , ....
........................ ~ .... ~'~ ~' ~ ~'~"': ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '. ~ , ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ · ~ , ~ ~ ~:
__ : ~`~.~`~..~-~- ~: :~-:~...~.. ~`.``L ~`~...`L~`.:..~...~..`~.`.~ ~`~.. ~`.``~`.~``: ......................L-. ~-..-~.....~.....L.--&--.-.~. ........;.,,,,:. :.....'......L,..~...,.~ ,,.:,..~.,...~ L..:...:_~2_: ......~..`~....~..`~..`~....~`~.~::..`~``.`~..`~.~.~....~.~.`~.. `~...~`...~`~..~ ....
114 .
J:_
I
ATTACHMENT B
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Project Study Report
Preliminary Cost Estimate
District-County-Route 04-ALA-580
KP(PM) 33.8/35.1(15.3/16.1)
EA 28480K
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1-580/San Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange Modifications
Limits Approximately 900 m west of San Ramon Rd Interchange to Westbound Off-ramp of
Interchange
Proposed Improvement (Scope) The proposed work for this project is: provide EB auxiliary
lane. widening ramps. and provide ramp widening near ramp termini. and signalize
intersections.
SUMMARY OF PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS
TOTAL STRUCTURE ITEMS
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
TOTAL PROJECT CAPITAL OUTLAY COSTS
$3,099,000
$0
$3,099,000
$0
$3,099.000
Reviewed by:
Approved by:
(Signature)
(Signature)
Phone No.
Date
Page 1 of 6
District-County-Route 04-ALA-580
KP(PM) 33.8/35.1(15.3/16.1)
EA 28480K
I. ROADWAY ITEMS
Section 1 Earthwork
Roadway Excavation
Imported Borrow
Clearing & Grubbing
Develop Water Supply
Quantity unit
7,650 M3
1,000 M3
Section 2 Pavement Structural Section*
PCC Pavement ( Depth) 3,000
PCC Pavement ( Depth)
Asphalt Concrete Pavement
Lean Concrete Base
Cement-Treated Base
Aggregate Base
Treated Permeable Base
Aggregate Subbase
Pavement Reinforcing Fabric
Edge Drains
AC Overlay 820
M2
13,500 M2
Totroe
1 LS
UnitPrice ItemCost Section Cost
$20 $153,000
$12 $12,000
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
Subtotal Earthwork $165.000
$60 $180,000
$ $
$40 $54O,OOO
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$55 $45,100
$ $
$ $
Subtotal Pavement
Structural Section
$765,000
Section 3 Drainage
Large Drainage Facilities
Storm Drains
Pumping Plants
Project Drainage
(X-Drains, overside, etc.)
$ $
$100,o00 $100,000
$ $_
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
Subtotal Drainage
$100,000
*Reference sketch showing typical pavement structural section elements of the roadway. Include (if available) T.I., R-Value
and date when tests were performed. NOTE: Extra lines are provided for items not listed, use additional lines as
appropriate.
Page 2 of 6
District-County-Route 04-ALA-580
KP(PM) 33.8/35.1 (15.3/16.1)
EA 28480K
Section 4 Specialty Items
Retaining Walls
Noise Barriers
Concrete Barriers (type 27A)
Equipment/Animal Passes
Highway Planting
Replacement Planting
Irrigation Modification
Relocate Private Irrigation
Facilities
Erosion Control
Slope Protection
Water Pollution Control
Hazardous Waste Mitigation
Work
Environmental Mitigation
Resident Engineer Office Space
MBGR
Minor Concrete (C & G, SW. &
Quantity
8Oo
300
0.58
Unit Unit Price Item Cost
M2 $500 $400,000
$ $
M $250 $75,000
$ $
$ $
HA $153,900 $89,262
$ $
$ $
HA $8,000 $6,560
$ $
LS $17,000 $17,000
$ $
$ $
$ $
M $80 $10,400
0.82
Section Cost
130
Medians)_ 280 M3 $350 $98,000
$ $
Subtotal Specialty Items
Section 5 Traffic Items
Lighting 1 LS $100,000 $100,000
Traffic Delineation Items 1 LS $10,000 $10,000
Traffic Signals 2 EA $120,000 $240,000
Overhead Sign Structures 2 EA $20,000 $40,000
Roadside Signs 1 LS $15,000 $15,000
Traffic Control Systems 1 LS $50,000 $50,000
Transportation Management Plan 1 LS $5,000 $5,000
$ $
$ $
$ $
$696,000
Subtotal Traffic Items
$460,000
TOTAL SECTIONS 1 thru 5
NOTE: Extra lines are provided for items not listed, use additional lines as appropriate.
$2~18&320
Page 3 of 6
District-County-Route 04-ALA-580
KP(PM) 33.8/35.1 (15.3/16.1)
EA 28480K
Section 6 Minor Items
Item Cost Section Cost
$2,186,320 x (5%)=
(Subtotal Sections 1 thru 5)
$109,316
TOTAL MINOR ITEMS
$109,300
Section 7 Roadway Mobilization
$2,295,620 x (5%)=
(Subtotal Sections 1 thru 6)
$114,781
TOTAL ROADWAY MOBILIZATION
$114.800
Section 8 Roadway Additions
Supplemental Work
$2,295,620 x (5%)=
(Subtotal Sections 1 thru 6)
$114,781
Contingencies
$2,295,620 x (25%)=
(Subtotal Sections 1 thru 6)
$573,905
TOTAL ROADWAY ADDITIONS
$688.700
TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS
(Subtotal Sections 1 thru 8)
$3,099,000
Estimate Prepared By Stacey Lee Phone# 510-763-4895 Date 09/18/00
(Print Name)
Estimate Checked By Heidi M. Ouren Phone# 510-763-4895 Date 09/18/00
(Print Name)
** Use appropriate percentage per Chapter 20.
Page 4 of 6
II. STRUCTURES ITEMS
Bridge Name
Stmcture Type
Width (out to out) - (m)
Span Lengths - (m)
Total Area - (m2)
Footing Type (pile/spread)
Cost Per m2
(ind. 10% mobilization
and 20% contingency)
Total Cost for Structure
Railroad Related Costs:
COMMENTS:
District-County-Route 04-ALA-580
KP(PM) 33.8/35.1 (15.3/16.1)
EA 28480K
Structure Structure Stmcture
( 1 ) (2) (3)
SUBTOTAL STRUCTURES ITEMS
(Sum of Total Cost for Structures)
SUBTOTAL RAILROAD ITEMS $
$0
0
TOTAL STRUCTURES ITEMS $
(Sum of Structures Items plus Railroad Items)
Estimate Prepared By
(Print Name)
Phone# Date
NOTE: If appropriate, attach additional pages and backup.
Page 5 of 6
III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
A. Acquisition, including excess lands,
damages to remainder(s) and Goodwill
B. Utility Relocation (State share)
C. Relocation Assistance
D. Clearance/Demolition
E. Title and Escrow Fees
District-County-Route 04-ALA-580
KP(PM) 33.8/35.1 (15.3/16.1)
EA 28480K
ESCALATED VALUE
TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS
(Escalated Value)
Anticipated Date of Right of Way Certification $ N/A
(Date to which Values are Escalated)
Construction Contract Work
Brief Description of Work:
Right of Way Branch Cost Estimate for Work *
* This dollar amount is to be included in the Roadway and/or
Structures Items of Work, as appropriate. Do not include in Right
of Way Items.
COMMENTS:
Estimate Prepared By
(Print Name)
Phone#
NOTE: If appropriate, attach additional pages and backup.
Date
Page 6 of 6
ATTACHMENT C
RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET
To:
Attention:
Subject:
District Office Chief
R/W Local Public Agency Services
Dislrict Branch Chief
Local Public Agency Services
Date: 9/18/00
Co. ALA Rte.
Expense Authorization
RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET- LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY SERVICES
580 K.P. 33.8 / 35.1
28480K
Project Description: Modification of 1-5 80/S an Ramon Rd/Foothill Rd Interchange to eliminate weaving problems and improve
traffic o~emtions.
Right of way necessary for the subject project will be the responsibility of N/A - No R/W required
The information in this dam sheet was developed by Stacey Lee
Right of Way Engineering
Will fight of way engineering be required for this project? · No X
· Yes __ (Submit a copy of the Right of Way Engineering, Surveys and Mapping Services
checklist for Special Funded Projects. This checklist includes but is not limited to the following
items.)
· Hard copy (base map) __
· Appraisal map __
· Acquisition Documents __
· Property Transfer Documents __
· R/W Record Map __
· Record of Survey __
Engineering Surv ,evs
1. Is any surveying or photogrammetric mapping required?
No __ Yes X (Complete the following)
2. Datum Requirements
Yes X Project will adhere to the following criteria.
· Horizontal ~ datum policy is NAD 83, CA-HPGN, EPOCH 1991.35 and metric.
· Vertical - datum policy is NAVD 88.
· Units - metric is required.
No
__ Provide an explanation on additional page.
Will land survey monument perpetuation be scoped into the project, if required?
Yes X
No Provide explanation on additional page.
R/W Data Sheet - Local Public Agency Services
Page 2 of 5
III. Parcel Information (Land and Improvements)
Are there any property rights required within the proposed project hmits?
No X Yes
A. Number of Vacant Land Parcels
__ (Complete the following)
Part Take
Full Take
Estimate $
$
B. Number of Single Family Residential Units
C. Number of Multi_Family Residential Units
D. Number of CommercialFlndustrial Parcels
E. Number of Farm/Agricultural Parcels
F. Permanent and/or Temporary Easements
G. Other Parcels (define in "Remarks" section)
Totals
$
0 0 $ 0
Provide a general description of the right of way and excess lands required (zoning, use, improvements,
critical, or semifive parcels, etc.). N/A
Dedications
Are there any property rights which have been acquired, or anticipate will be acquired, through the
"dedication" process for the Project?
No X Yes __ (Complete the following)
Number of dedicated parcels 0
Have the dedication parcel(s) been accepted by the municipality involved ? N/A
Excess Lands/Rdinquishments
Are there Caltrans property rights which may become excess lands or potential relinquishment areas?
No X Yes (Provide an explanation on additional page.)
Reve298 p~k
R/W Data Sheet - Local Public Agency Services
Page 3 of 5
Relocation InformaltOn
Are relocation displacements anticipated?
No X Yes (Complete the following)
A. Number of Single Family Residential Units
Estimated RAP Payments
B. Number of Multi_Family Residential Units
Estimated RAP Payments
C. Number of Business/Nonpro~t
Estimated RAP Payments
Number of Farms
Estimated RAP Payments
Other (define in the "Remarks" section)
Eslimated RAP Payments
D,
Eo
Totals 0
$ 0
Utility Relocation Information
Anticipate any utility facilities or utility rights of way to be affected?
No X Yes
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Facility Owner
__ (Complete the following)
Estimated Relocation Expense
State Local Utility Owner
Obligation Obligation Obligation
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
$ $ $
Totals
Number of facilities 0 [ $ 0 * I $
*This amount reflects the estimated total financial obligation by the State.
° I$
Additional information concerning utility involvement on this project?
R/W Data Sheet - Local Public Agency Services
Page 4 of 5
RevS/98 pgk
Utilities to be protected in place.
VIII.
Rail Information
Are railroad facilities or railroad fights of way affected?
No X Yes __ (Complete the following)
Describe railroad facilities or railroad rights of way affected.
Owner's Name
Transverse Crossing
Longitudinal Encroachment
Discuss types of agreements and rights required from the railroads. Are grade crossings requiring services
contracts, or grade separations requiring construction and maintenance agreements involved?
Clearance Information
Are there improvements that require clearance?
No X Yes __(Complete the following)
A. Number of Structures to be Demolished 0 $ 0
Estimated Cost of Demolition
Hazardous Materials/Ff aste
Are there any site(s) and/or improvements(s) in the Project Limits that are known to contain
hazardous materials? None X Yes __ (Explain in the "Remarks" section)
Are there any site(s)and/or improvement(s) in the Project Limits that are suspected to contain
hazardous waste? None X Yes
XI. Pro}eet Scheduling
* Preliminary Engineering, Surveys
* R/W Engineering Submittals
* R/W Appraisals/Acquisition
Proposed Environmental Clearance
Proposed R/W Certification
__ (Explain in the "Remarks" section)
Proposed lead time Completion date
20 (months) June. 2002
0 (monthsJ N/A
0 (months) N/A
June. 2001
June. 2002
Rev8/98 pgk
R/W Data Sheet - Local Public Agency Services
Page 5 of 5
XII. Proposed Funding
Local
State Federal Other
Acquisition N/A
Utilities N/A
Relocation Assistance Program N/A
R/W Support N/A
Cost (Eng. Appraisals, etc.)
Remarks All work proposed by this project is within state ri~,ht of way. and will be 100% locally funded.
Project Sponsor Consultant
Prepared by:
Project Sponsor
Reviewed and Approved by:
Heidi Ouren
Ferdinand Del Rosado
HOE, Inc. City of Dublin
Date
9/18/00
Date
Caltrans
Reviewed by:
Caltrans District Branch Chief
Local Public Agency Services
Division of Right of Way
Date
RevB/98 pgk
ATTACHMENT D
DRAFT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
N- 1 Pre-Approved
June 8, 2000
MMM
4-ALA-580 KP 33&35.1
(P.M. R21.0-R21.8)
28480K
Foothill/San Ram on I/C
Dist. Agrnt. No. 1834-C
Document No. ALA-1~
THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON , is
between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of
Transportation, referred to herein as ~STATE", and
CITY OF CAN RAMON, a body politic and
a .municipal corporation of the State of
California, referred to herein as "CITY".
STATE and CITY, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 130, .are
authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State
highways within the City of San Ramon.
CITY desires to construct State highway improvements consisting of
reconstructing the existing Foothill/San Ramon Interchange on Route 580,
referred to herein as "PROJECT", and is willing to fund one hundred percent
(100%) of all capital outlay and staffing costs, except for costs of STATE's
oversight of project development and construction activities.
CITY desires to prepare the contract documents and advertise, award, and
administer the construction contract for PROJECT in order to bring about
the earliest possible completion of PROJECT.
STATE is agreeable to CITY's proposal to prepare the contract documents
and advertise, award, and administer the construction contract for
PROJECT.
This Agreement supersedes any prior Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
relating to PROJECT.
The parties hereto intend to define herein the terms and conditions under
which PROJECT is to be developed, designed, constructed, financed, and
maintained.
Draft District Agreement No. 1834-C
SECTION I
LOCAL AGENCY AGREES:
To perform all necessary preliminary engineering, including environmental
documentation (ED), prepare detailed Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
(PS&E), and utility identification and location, and perform all necessary
construction engineering for PROJECT and bear all actual costs thereof.
To submit to STATE detailed PS&E for review and approval. Final plans and
standard special provisions shall be signed by a Civil Engineer registered in
the State of California.
Personnel who prepare the PS&E and right of way maps shall be available to
STATE, at no cost to STATE, through completion of construction of PROJECT
to discuss problems which may arise during construction and/or to make
design revisions for contract change orders.
To make written application to STATE for necessary encroachment permits
authorizing entry onto the State highway right of way to perform surveying
and other investigative activities required for preparation of the ED and/or
PS&E.
To identify and locate all high and low risk underground facilities within the
area of PROJECT as part of its design responsibility and to protect or
otherwise provide for such facilities, all in accordance with STATE's Manual
on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights of
Way". CITY hereby acknowledges receipt of STATE'S "Manual on High and
Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights of Way". All
facilities not relocated or removed in advance of construction shall be
identified on the PS&E for PROJECT.
To furnish evidence to STATE, in a form acceptable to STATE, that
arrangements have been made for the protection, relocation, or removal of all
conflicting facilities within the State highway right of way and that such work
will be completed prior to the award of the contract to construct PROJECT or
as covered in the PS&E for said contract. This evidence shall include a
reference to all required State highway encroachment permits.
CITY shall require the utility owner and/or its contractors performing the
protection or relocation work within the State highway fight of way to obtain
an encroachment permit.from STATE prior to the performance of said work.
To be responsible, at CITY's expense, for the investigation of potential
hazardous waste sites within and outside of the existing State highway right
of way that would impact PROJECT as part of the responsibility for the ED
for PROJECT.
Draft District Agreement No. 1834-C
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Any hazardous material found within the area of PROJECT requiring remedy
or remedial action, as defined I Division 20, Chapter 6.8 et seq. of the Health
and Safety Code, or any cultural, palleontological, anthropological, or other
protected resource requiring protection shall be the responsibility of CITY, at
CITY's expense as part of the costs of PROJECT. Locations subject to
remedy or remedial action and/or protection include utility relocation work
required for PROJECT. Costs for remedy and 'remedial action and/or
protection shall include, but not be limited to, the identification, treatment,
removal, packaging, transportation, storage, and disposal of such material.
CITY shall be responsible, at CITY's expense, for the development of the
necessary remedy and/or remedial action plans and designs. Remedial
actions proposed by CITY shall be preapproved by STATE and shall be
performed in accordance with STATE's standards and practices and those
standards mandated by the Federal and State regulatory agencies.
To advertise, award and administer the construction contract for PROJECT
in accordance with requirements of the State Contract Act and the California
Labor COde, including its' prevailing wage provisions. Workers employed in
the performance of work contracted for by CITY, and/or performed under
encroachment permit, are covered by provisions of the Labor Code in the
same manner as are workers employed by STATE's contractors. CITY shall
obtain applicable wage rates from the State" Department of Industrial
Relations and shall adhere to the applicable provisions of the State Laboi
Code. Violations shall be reported to the State Department of Industrial
Relations.
To apply for necessary encroachment permits for required work within State
highway rights of way, in accordance with STATE's standard permit
procedures, as more specifically defined in Articles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Section
III of this Agreement.
In recognition that construction work for PROJECT done on STATE's
property will not be directly funded and paid by STATE, for the purpose of
protecting stop notice claimants and the interests of STATE relative to the
successful completion of PROJECT, CITY agrees to require its construction
contractor to furnish both a payment and performance bond naming CITY as
obligee with both bonds complying with the requirements set forth in Section
3-1.02 of STATE's current Standard Specifications prior to performing any
construction work for PROJECT. CITY shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless STATE, its officers and employees from all claims related to the
construction of PROJECT under the payment or performance bond by
contractors' and all claimants.
To construct PROJECT in accordance with the plans and speCification~ of
CITY to the satisfaction of and subject to the approval of STATE.
Contract Administration procedures shall conform to the applicable
requirements set forth is STATE's Construction Manual, Local Assistance
Procedures Manual and the Encroachment Pen~it for° the construction of
PROJECT,
3
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Draft District Agreement No. 1834-0
Construction within the existing or ultimate State highway right of way shall
comply with the requirements in STATE's Standard Specifications and
PROJECT Special Pr~ovisions, and in conformance with methods and
practices specified in STATE's Construction Manual.
If CITY uses its own staff or hires another entity to perform surveys, all
survey work shall conform to the methods, procedures, and requirements of
STATE's Surveys Manual and STATE's Sting Information Booklet.
Material testing and quality control shall conform to STATE's Construction
Manual and STATEs Material Testing Manual, and shall be performed, at
CITY's expense, by a certified material-tester acceptable to STATE.
Independent assurance testing, specialty testing, and off-site source
inspection and testing shall be performed by STATE, at no cost to CITY
except as noted herein. CITY shall reimburse STATE for any additional travel
expenses incurred by STATE for off-site inspection and testing performed by
STATE which is more than 300 airline miles from both Sacramento and Los
Angeles. Approval of the type of asphalt and concrete plants shall be by
STATE, at STATE expense.
To furnish, at CITY expense and subject to approval of STATE, a field site
representative who is a license Civil Engineer in the State of California, to
perform the functions of a Resident Engineer. If the' plans and specifications
for PROJECT were prepared by a private engineering company, the Resident
Engineer shall not be an employee of that company. The Resident Engineer
shall also be independent of the construction contractor.
To pay one hundred percent (100%) of the actual costs of construction
required for satisfactory completion of PROJECT, including changes
pursuant to contract change orders concurred with by the STATE
representative and any material furnished by STATE.
At CITY's expense, to furnish qualified support staff, subject to approval of
STATE, to assist the Resident Engineer in, but not limited to, construction
surveys, soils and foundation tests, measurement and computation of
quantities, testing of construction materials, checking .shop drawings,
preparation of estimates and reports, preparation of "As-Built" drawings, and
other inspection and staff services necessary to assure that the construction
is being peffo~Taed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Said
qualified support staff shall be independent of the design engineering
company and construction contractor, except that the designer of PROJECT
may check the shop drawings, do soils foundation tests, test construction
materials, and do construction surveys.
To make progress payments to the contractor using CITY's funds and pay all
costs for required staff services as described in Articles 18 and 20 of this
Section I. STATE's representative shall review all contract progress pay
schedules. STATE does not assume responsibility for accuracy of itemization
on progress pay schedules.
4
Draft District Agreement No. 1834-C
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Within sixty (60) days following the completion and acceptance of the
construction contract for PROJECT, to furnish STATE with a complete set of
acceptable full-sized film positive reproducible "As-Built" plans and a copy of
all contract recordsT including survey documents, Records of Surveys, and a -
micro film copy of all structure plans.
Upon completion of work under this Agreement, CITY will assume
maintenance and the expense thereof for any part of PROJECT located
outside of the current State highway right of way until acceptance of any
such part of PROJECT into the State highway system by STATE, approval by
the Federal Highway Administration, ff required and conveyance of
acceptable title to STATE.
If CITY terminates PROJECT prior to completion of the construction contract
for PROJECT, STATE may require CITY, at CITY's expense, to return STATE's
right of way to its original condition or to a condition of acceptable
permanent operation. If CITY fails to do so, STATE reserves the right to
finish PROJECT or plac,e PROJECT in satisfactory permanent operation
condition. STATE will bill CITY for all actual expenses incurred and CITY
agrees to pay said expenses within thirty (30) days or STATE, acting through
the State Controller, may withhold an equal amount from future
apportionments due CITY from the Highway User Tax Fund.
If buried cultural, archaeological, paleontological or other protected materiali
are encountered during construction of PROJECT, CITY shall stop work in
that area, until a qualified professional can evaluate the nature and
significance of the fred and a plan is approved for the removal or protection
of that material.
To obtain, at CITY's expense, all necessary pern~its and/or agreements from
appropriate regulatory agencies. All mitigation, monitoring, and/or remedial
action required by said permits shall constitute part of the cost of PROJECT.
SECTION II
STATE AGREES:
To provide, at no cost to CITY, oversight of all work on PROJECT done by
CITY or its designee, to provide prompt reviews and approvals, as
appropriate, of submittals by CITY, and to cooperate in timely processing of
PROJECT.
Upon proper application by CITY, to issue, at no cost to CITY, an
encroachment permit to CITY authorizing entry onto the State highway right
of way to perform survey and other investigative activities required for
preparation of the ED and/or PS&E. If CITY uses consultants rather than its
own staff to perform required work, the consultants will also be required to
obtain an encroachment permit. The permit will be issued at no cost upon
proper application by the consultants.
Draft District Agreement No. 1834-C
To issue at no cost to CITY and CITY's contractor, upon proper application by
CITY and by CITY's contractor, the necessary encroachment permits for
required work within the State highway right of way, as more specifically
defined in Articles 2, 374, 5 and 6 of Section III of this Agreement.
To provide, at no cost to CITY, a qualified STATE representative who shall
have authority to accept or reject work and materials or to order any actions
needed for public safety or the preservation of property and to assure
compliance with all provisions of the encroachment permit(s) issued to CITY
and CITY's contractor.
To provide, at CITY expense, any "State-furnished material" as shown on the
plans for PROJECT and as provided in the Special Provisions for PROJECT.
SECTION' IH
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:
All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the
appropriation of resources by the Legislature.
Construction by CITY of improvements referred to herein which lie within the
State highway right of way or affect STATE's facilities, shall not be
commenced until CITY's original contract plans involving such work and plan
for utility relocations have been reviewed and accepted by STATE's District
Director of Transportation or the District Director's delegated agent and an
encroachment perirdt authorizing Such work has been issued to CITY by
STATE.
CITY shall obtain aforesaid encroachment permit through the office of State
District Permit Engineer and CITY's application shah be accompanied by five
(51 sets of reduced construction plans of aforesaid STATE-accepted contract
plans, and five {5) sets of specifications. Receipt by CITY of the approved
encroachment permit shah constitute CITY's authorization from STATE to
proceed with work to be performed by CITY or CITY's representatives within
the proposed State highway fight of way or which affects STATE's facilities,
pursuant to work covered by this Agreement. CITY's authorization to
proceed with said work shall be contingent upon CITY's compliance with all
provisions set forth in this Agreement and said encroachment permit.
CITY's construction contractor shah also be required to obtain an
encroachment permit from STATE prior to commencing any work within the
State highway right of way or which affects STATE's facilities. The
application by CITY's construction contractor for said encroachment permit
shah be made through the office of STATE's District Permit Engineer and
shah include proof said construction contractor has payment and
perfon~ance surety bonds covering construction of PROJECT.
Draft District Agreement No. 1834-C
10.
11.
CITY shall provide a right of way certification prior to the granting of said
encroachment permit by STATE, to certify that legal and physical control of
rights of way were acquired in accordance with applicable State and Federal
laws and regulations. ~'
CITY shall not advertise for bids to construct PROJECT until after an
encroachment permit has been issued to CITY by STATE.
CITY's construction contractor shall maintain in force, until completion and
acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT, a policy of Contractual
Liability Insurance, including coverage of Bodily Injury Liability and Property
Damage Liability in accordance with Section 7-1.12 of STATE's Standard
Specifications. Such policy shall contain an additional insured endorsement
naming STATE, its officers, agents, and employees as additional insured
Coverage shall be evidenced by a Certificate of Insurance in a form
satisfactory to STATE which shall be delivered to STATE before the issuance
of an encroachment permit to CITY's contractor.
During the construction of PROJECT, representatives of CITY and STATE will
cooperate and consult, and all work pursuant to PROJECT shall be
accomplished according to approved plans, specifications, and STATE's
applicable standards. STATE's representative shall verify satisfaction of
these requirements. STATE's representative is authorized to enter. CITY's
property during construction for the purpose of monitoring and coordinating
construction activities.
Changes to the plans and specifications for PROJECT shall be implemented
by contract change orders reviewed and concurred with by STATE's
representative. All changes affecting public safety or public convenience, all
design and specification changes, and all major changes as defined in
STATE's Construction Manual shall be approved by STATE in advance of
performing the work. Unless otherwise directed by STATE's representative,
changes authorized as provided herein will not require an encroachment
permit rider. All changes shall be shown on the "As-Built" plans referred to
in Article (2 1) of Section I of this Agreement.
CITY shall provide a construction contract claims process acceptable to
STATE and shall process any and all claims through CITY's claim process.
STATE's representative will be made available to CITY to provide advice and
technical input in any claim process.
If any existing public and/or private utility facilities conilict with the
construction of PROJECT or violate STATE's encroachment policy, CITY shall
make all necessary arrangements. with the owners of such facilities for their
protection, relocation, or removal in accordance with STATE's policy and
procedure for those facilities located within the limits of work providing for
the improvement to the State highway and in accordance with CITY's policy
for those facilities located outside of the limits of work for the improvement to
the State highway. The cost of the protection, relocation or removal shall be
apportioned between the owner of the utility facility and CITY in accordance
with STATE's policy and procedure. CITY shall require any utility owner
· Draft District Agreement No. 1834-C
12.
performing relocation work in the State highway right of way to obtain an
encroachment permit from STATE prior to the performance of said relocation
work. The requirements of the most current version of STATE's "Policy on
High and Low risk UndergFound Facilities Within Highway Rights of Way"
shall be fully complied with. Any relocated or new facilities shall be correctly
shown and identified on the "As-Built" plans referred to in Article 23 of
Section I of this Agreement.
13.
If any unforseen potential hazardous material sites are encountered during
construction of PROJECT CITY shall confer with appropriate professionals
and regulatory agencies on a course of action. C~TY may be required to stop
work until the nature of the fred can be evaluated and until a remedy or
remedial action plan is prepared and approved. The costs for any required
remedy or remedial action shall be covered as a cost of PROJECT
contemplated by this Agreement.
14.
Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 591 of the Vehicle Code,
STATE has determined that within such areas as are within the limits of
PROJECT and are open to public traffic, CITY shall comply with all of the
requirements set forth in Divisions 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of the Vehicle
Code. CITY shall take all necessary precautions for safe operation of CITY's
vehicles, the construction contractor's equipment and vehicles and/or
vehicles of personnel retained by CITY, and for the protection of the traveling
public from injury and damage from such vehicles or equipment.
15.
All phases of PROJECT, from inception through construction, whether done
by CITY or STATE, shall .be developed in accordance with all policies,
procedures, practices, and standards that STATE would normally follow.
16.
Upon completion and acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT
by CITY to the satisfaction of STATE's representative and subsequent to the
execution of a maintenance agreement, STATE will accept control and
maintain, at its own cost and expense, those portions of PROJECT lying
within the State highway fight of way, except local roads delegated to CITY
for maintenance. STATE will maintain the entire structure below the deck
surface of local road overcrossings, at STATE's expense.
17.
CITY will accept control and maintain, at its own cost and expense, the
portions of PROJECT lying outside the State highway right of way. Also,
CITY will maintain at CITY expense, local roads within STATE's right of way
delegated to CITY for maintenance, and remaining portions of any local road
overcrossing structures, including the deck surface and above, as well as all
traffic service facilities that may be required for the exclusive benefit or
control of CITY's local road traffic.
~f~?':~$~ATE. will maintain the traf~ ..cb~i~.01"sig'nal system' '.ah"d :Safety li.~~a
ins. tailed and .pay-. ,-m - amount "a'qUll :: t0 ?. .' . . percant' (" %) of. 'the total
maiin'~dnai~C~(d6s~S,' inCliiding eie'ctrical ene~'~, ~0its. '. citY' shall reimb~t:ri~
$~A~'E.'!~Gr '~ITY's' p~p0~ti~iate. share. 9f-sa.'id 2main~enan&e:..c0stS;. s~!dil 's~ire
to be an amount equal to' "5per. c~nt'(_'.2%) o[ the total main~en.ance Cgst.s.i:
ini.qlUding el.e~.rical ener. g~..~oitsi
Draft District Agreement No. 1834-C-
~1~'; ~J~'ti{'ri "i'kie traffid' do~trol ..signalT.and'siif6tyi"'ligiitiTn~:'i'
Lii~t2 eqdai'to .:. l:.-., B~:i-cen'~;'.]E[": ]°(o).'.gf.th.ej i'tota!~rnaintenind.e
Costs, .,.if/~ludin~"'eledtrical..enei-gy.~':ai~ts..:::."STATE,-; shall'."reimburse': CITY. for
STATE~S' i~op0i*ticinate Share oi':'S~a
am6..~fi.i :~eqgS.aSi'~'5:' t6 ".';:)!p'erge~5f'~'(Y::-):;:%)').':'..:'9'jf.'...~.~.'.a."".'2' ~b.'t~c-i).~.'d.int6:.n~e .' .'.c.o.~..~i.','
in.c..1.u..d. ii~g .2el~.c.'~ical..eLn. e.'.r. gy
2O..
Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership and title to
materials, equipment, and appurtenances installed within the State highway
right of way will automatically be vested in STATE, and materials, equipment
and appurtenances installed outside of the State highway right of way will
automatically be vested in CITY. No further agreement will be necessary to
transfer ownership as hereinbefore stated.
21.
Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or
obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect
the legal liability of either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard
of care with respect to the development, design, construction, operation, or
maintenance of State highways and public facilities different from the
standard of care imposed by law.
22.
Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any
damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be
done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that,
pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend,
indemnify and save harmless STATE and all its officers and employees from
all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or
on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8)
occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or
in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY
under this Agreement.
23.
Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible ,for any ..~
damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be ,,
done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or
jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and
agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully
defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY from all claims, suits or actions of
every name, kind and description brought for or on accotint of injury (as
defined in Government Code Section 8 10.8) occurring by reason of anything
- Draft District Agreement No. 1834-C
24.
25.
26.
27.
done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement.
This Agreement may 15e terminated or provisions contained herein may be
altered, changed, or amended by mutual consent of the parties hereto.
No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless
made in writing and signed by the parties hereto and no oral understanding
or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties
hereto.
Those portions of this Agreement pertaining to the construction of PROJECT
shall terminate upon completion and acceptance of the construction contract
for PROJECT by CITY with concurrence of STATE, or on, whichever is earlier
in time; however, the ownership, operation, maintenance, liability, and
claims clauses shall remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing
by mutual agreement.
10
DRAFT District Agreement No. 4-XXXX-C
SCOPE OF WORK
This Scope of Work outlines the specific
development activities for the proposed
areas of responsibility for various project
Description of Project__
1. (CITYCOUNTY) and STATE concur that the proposal is a Category __ as defined in
STATE's Project Development Procedures Manual.
2. STATE will review, monitor, and approve all project development reports, studies, and
plans, and provide all necessary implementation activities up to, but not including
advertising of the project.
Use one of the two alternative Articles, as appropriate.
3. The existing freeway agreement need not be revised.
Use the following alternative Article when existing freeway agreement needs to be revised.
4. STATE will provide the revised freeway agreement and obtain approval of the new
public road connection(s) from the California Transportation Commission.
5. All phases of the project; from inception through construction, whether done by
(CITYCOUNTY) or STATE, ~vill be developed in accordance with all policies, procedures,
practices, and standards that STATE would normally follow.
6. Detailed steps in the project development process are attached to this Scope of Work.
These Attachments are intended as a guide to STATE and (CITY/COUNTY) staff.
8
DRAFT District Agreement No. 4-XXXX-C
PROJECT ACTMTY
ATTACHMENT 1
PLANNING PHASE ACTIVITIES
RESPONSIBILITY
STATE (CITYCOUNTY)
1. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS & DOCUMENT PREPARATION
Establish Project Development Team (PDT)
Approve PDT
Project Category Determination
Start and maintain Project History File
Prepare Preliminary Environmental Assessment
Identify Preliminary Alternatives and Costs
Prepare and Submit Environmental Studies and Reports
Review and Approve Environmental Studies and Reports
Prepare and Submit Draft Environmental Document (DED)
Review DED in District
2. PROJECT GEOMETRICS DEVELOPMENT
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Apply for Encroachment Permit for Surveying on Site
Issue Encroachment Permit X
Prepare Existing Traffic Analysis
Prepare Future Traffic Volumes for Alternatives
Prepare Project Geometrics and Profiles
Prepare Layouts and Estimates for Alternatives
Prepare Operational Analysis for Alternatives
Review and Approve Pruject Geometrics andOperational Analysis X
3. PROJECT APPROVAL
Lead Agency for Environment Compliance Certifies
ED in Accordance with its Procedures X
Prepare Draft Project Report (DPR) X
Finalize and Submit Project Report with Certified ED for Approval X
Approve Project Report X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
DRAFT District Agreement No. 4-XXXX-C
ATTACHMENT 2
DESIGN PHASE ACTIVITIES
PROJECT ACTI~TY
1. PRELIMINARY COORDINATION
Request 1- Phase EA
Field Review of Site
Provide Geometrics
Approve Geometrics
Designate a Surveying Manager and Conduct
Initial Surveys Discussion with District Staff
Obtain Surveys & Aerial Mapping
Obtain Copies of Assessor Maps and Other R/W Maps
Obtain Copies of As-Builts
Send Approved Geometrics to Local Agencies for Review
Revise Approved Geometrics if Required
Approve Final Geometrics
Determine Need for Permits from Other Agencies
Request PernMts
Initial Hydraulics Discussion with District Staff
Initial Electrical Design Discussion with District Staff
Initial Traffic & Signing Discussion with District Staff
Initial Landscape Design Discussion with District Staff
Plan Sheet Format Discussion
2. ENGINEERING STUDIES AND REPORTS
Prepare and Submit Survey Data
Review and Approve Survey Data
Prepare & Submit Materials Report and Typical Section
Review and Approve Materials Report and Typical Section
Prepare and Submit Landscaping Recommendation
Review and Approve Landscaping Recommendation
Prepare and Submit Hydraulic Design Studies
Review and Approve Hydraulic Design Studies
Prepare and Submit Bridge General Plan and
Structure Type Selection
Revie~v and Approve Bridge General Plan and
Structure Type Selection
RESPONSIBILITY
STATE (CITYCOUNTY)
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
10
DRAFT District Agreement No. 4-XXXX-C
PROJECT ACTIVITY
RESPONSIBILITY
STATE (CITYCOUNTY)
3. R/W ACQUISITION & UTILITIES
(Used when qualified Local Agency is performing R/W activities)
Send Geometric Base Maps to R/W staff for Ordering Title Reports
Request Utility Verification
Request Preliminary Utility Relocation Plans from Utilities
Prepare R/W Requirements
Prepare R/W and Utility Relocation Cost Estimates
Submit R/W Requirements and Utility
Relocation Plans for Review
Review and Comment on R/W Requirements X
Longitudinal Encroachment Review X
Longitudinal Encroachment Application to District
Approve Longitudinal Encroachment Application X
Request Final Utility Relocation Plans
Check Utility Relocation Plans
Submit Utility Relocation Plans for Approval
Approve Utility Relocation Plans X
Prepare Utility Agreements
Submit Final R/W Requirements for Review and Approval
Fence and Excess Land Review X
R/W Layout Review X
Approve R/W Requirements X
Prepare and Submit R/W Certificate of Sufficiency
Review and Approve R/W Certificate of Sufficiency X
Perform Record and Non-record Data Search
Con~plete Property Surveys and Begin Monumentation
Prepare Retracemerit Record of Survey
(Pre~construction)
Review and Comment on Record of Survey X
Prepare R/W engineering Hard Copy
Prepare R/W Appraisal Map
Provide STATE with R/W Engineering Back-up and
Reference Data
Review and Accept R/W Hard Copies and Appraisal Maps X
Obtain Title Reports
Complete Appraisals
Review; and Approve Appraisals for Setting
Just Compensation X
Prepare Legal Descriptions
Review and Accept Legal Descriptions X
Complete Acquisition Documents
Review and Accept Acquisition Documents X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
11
DRAFT District Agreement No. 4-XXXX-C
Acquire R/W
- Open Escrows and Make Payments
~ Obtain Resolution of Necessity
- Perform Eminent Domain Proceedings
Provide Displace Relocation Services
Prepare Relocation Payment Valuation
Provide Displacee Relocation Payments
Perform Property Management Activities
Perform R/W Clearance Activities
Prepare and Submit Certification of R/W
Review and Approve Certification of R/W
Submit Monumentation Layout for Project Monuments
Review and Approve Agreed Layout for Project Monuments
Complete new Right of Way Monumentation
Prepare Record of Survey (Post-construction)
Review and Comment on Record of Survey
Transfer R/W to State
- Approve and Record Title Transfer Documents
Prepare R/W Record Maps
Review and Accept R/W Record Maps
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
12
DRAFT District Agreement No. 4-XXXX-C
PROJECT ACTIVITY
RESPONSIBILITY
STATE (CITYCOUNTY)
4. PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES
Prepare and Submit Preliminary Stage Construction Plans
Review Preliminary Stage Construction Plans
Calculate and Plot Geometrics
Cross-Sections & Earthwork Quantities Calculation
Prepare and Submit BEES Estimate
Put Estimate in BEES
Local Review of Preliminary Drainage Plans and
Sanitary Sewer and Adjustment Details
Prepare and Submit Preliminary Drainage Plans
Review Preliminary Drainage Plans
Prepare Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation
Plans and Submit for Review
Review Traffic Striping and Roadside Delineation Plans
Prepare and Submit Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans
Review Landscaping and/or Erosion Control Plans
Prepare and Submit Preliminary Electrical Plans
Review Preliminary Electrical Plans
Prepare and Submit Preliminary Signing Plans
Review Preliminary Signing Plans
Quantity Calculations
Safety Review
Prcparc Specifications
Prepare and Submit Checked Structure Plans
Revie~v and Approve Checked Structure Plans
Prepare Final Contract Plans
Prepare Lane Closure Requirernent~
Revie~v and Approve Lane Closure Requirements
Prepare and Submit Striping Plan
Review and Approve Striping Plan
Prepare Final Estimate
Prepare and Submit Draft PS&E
Review Draft PS&E
Finalize and Submit PS&E to STATE for Approval
Prepare & Submit Copy of Survey Engineer's File
Review Survey Engineer's File
Prepare & Submit Skeleton Plans (For use in
Future Freeway Maintenance Agreement)
Prepare & Submit Copy of Resident Engineer's File
Prepare & Submit all Project Files & Records
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
13
DRAFT District Agreement No. 4-XXXX-C
ATTACHMENT 3
DEFINITIONS
Basic Design Features - A general description of the facility:
, Design speed of State highway facility and Local Agency roads and streets.
, Number of through lanes, auxiliary lanes and locations of interchanges and
separations.
· Widths of through lanes, medians, and shoulders for both the State highway
facility and local roads and streets.
· Need for special feature such as soundwalls, transportation system management
plans, HOV lanes, bridge widening, ramp metering, etc. See Figure 2-1.3A of
State Project Development Procedures Manual for additional discussion of items
to be considered as basic design features.
Mandatory and Advisory Design Standards - See Index 82.3 of State's Highway Design
Manual for the definition and listing of these items.
14