Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNo PA#/Prpsd.PlanLine/NewRoad-3GITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT Planning Commission Meeting Date: May 16, 1988 SUBJECT: Proposed Plan Line - New Road Parallel to and Southerly of Dublin Boulevard (Between Amador Plaza Road and Regional Street) EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibits A) Resolution Recommending City Council Adoption of Plan Line Attachments 1) Plan Line Alternatives Map 2) Description of Proposed Plan Line Alternative 1 3) Description of Proposed Plan Line Alternative 3 RECO~MENDATION:~_ ~L-- Adopt Resolution Recommending City Council Approval of Plan Line FINANCIAL STATF~MENT: No direct financial impacts would occur from the recommended action. Costs to the City as a result of development of the road would depend on the financing mechanism selected for this project. A separate action would be required by the City Council to authorize financing the project. DESCRIPTION: Discussion Public hearings regarding the plan line for a road parallel to and southerly of Dublin Boulevard were held by the Planning Commission on April 4 and May 2, 1988. At the May 2, 1988, meeting, the Planning Commission considered three plan line alternatives (Attachment 1) and closed the public hearing. After adopting a resolution recommending that the City Council certify the Negative Declaration, the Commission indicated their preference to recommend Alternative 3. City Staff had recommended Alternative 1 and had not prepared a legal description for the other alternatives. The Planning Commission continued deliberation on the item and directed Staff to prepare the legal description for Alternative 3. Staff believes that Alternative 1 is preferable. The preliminary estimate of costs to acquire land, mitigate impacts, and design and construct the road per Alternative 1 is $3.0 million. Alternative 3 would be more costly as it requires the acquisition of additional lands and may require compensation for the severing of a parcel (i.e., the Enea property). The right-of-way that has been offered for dedication (adjacent to the Enea Plaza development) was part of a negotiated settlement for a lawsuit pertaining to the Conditions of Approval for the Enea Plaza project. The preliminary estimate for Alternative 3 is $3.3 million. This estimate does not include possible additional compensation for severing a parcel. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Plan Line Alternative 1 to the City Council. As the Commission has indicated a preference for Alternative 3, the legal description for Alternative 3 is also attached. The draft resolution has a blank which can be filled in with the Alternative n~ber recommended by the Planning Commission. ITEM NO. ~o I COPIES TO: Property Owners File RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISH A PLAN LINE FOR PARALLEL ROAD SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM REGIONAL STREET TO AMADOR PLAZA ROAD WHEREAS, the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin by Resolution No. 55-87 on July 21, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan contains an objective in the vehicular circulation plan to develop a plan line for a new street south of Dublin Boulevard connecting Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on April 4, 1988, and continued the hearing to May 2, 1988, and continued the deliberation to May 16, 1988; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been recommended for adoption (Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-026) for this project, as it will have no significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Staff report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the project (Alternative 1); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth; and WHEREAS, the plan line is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing and proposed land uses and conforming to the underlying land use designation and it will not overburden public services; and WHEREAS, the plan line will not have a substantial adverse effect on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or public improvement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the plan line Alternative __ as described on the attached Exhibits A and B dated May 11, 1988. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Planning Commission Chairperson Planning Director /kT, t ® ® Proposed Street Right-of-Way SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN AMADOR PLAZA ROAD AND REGIONAL STREET Ail that certain real property situated in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the west 1 ine of Amador Plaza Road on the south line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Enea Plaza recorded December 19, 1980, as Instrument No. 80-224805, Records of Alameda County; thence northerly along said west line of Amador Plaza Road 427 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence leaving said west line of Amador Plaza Road along the arc of a non-tangent 30.00 foot radius curve, concave to the northwest, to a point on the prolongation of the north line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Robert T..& Betty J. Wolverton recorded December 20, 1978, as Instrument No. 78-248211, Records of Alameda County; thence, on a course tangent tothe previous curve westerly along said prolongation of said north 1 ine (78-248211) a distance of 285 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of said Wolverton Parcel (78-248211); thence westerly along said north line (78-248211) and its prolongation 430 feet, more or less, to a point on the centerline of Golden Gate Drive, hereon referred to as Point "A"; thence in a southwesterly direction 380 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 966 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 105 feet, more or less, to a point on the east line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Peter B. Bedford recorded November 21, 1982, as Instrument No. 82-193550, Records of Alameda County, said point hereon referred to as Point "B", lying South 4 feet, measured at right angles to, the prolongation of the south line of an existing warehouse lying on said Bedford parcel (82-193550);thence westerly on a course parallel with said south line of the existing warehouse 330 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the southeast, having a radius of 332 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 125 feet, more or less; thence on a course tangent to the previous curve southwesterly 130 feet, more.or less, to the beginning of a tangent curvet concave to the north, having a radius of 266 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 120 feet, more or less, to a point on the south line of said Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence on a course tangent to the previous curve along said south line (82-193550) a distance of 165 feet! more or less, to the east line of Regional Street; thence leaving said south line (82-193550) southerly along said east line of Regional Street to a point 68 feet south, measured at right angles to said south line (82- 193550); thence in an easterly direction parallel with said south line (82-193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius 334 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 90 feet, more or less; thence on a course tangent to the previous curve, "ATTACHMENT Z ,, rYxA¥ IL, northeasterly 130 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 268 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 80 feet, more or less, to a point 68 feet south of, measured at right angles to, the prolongation of the south line of said existing.warehouse lying within the Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence easterly parallel with said prolongation 330 feet, more or less, to a point south 64 feet from Point "B", at the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 1034 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 105 feet, more or less; thence on a course tangent to the previous curve, northeasterly 375 feet, more or less, to a point on the centerline of Golden Gate Drive, said point being South 68 feet from Point "A"; thence easterly on a course parallel with the north line of said Wolverton parcel (78-248211), and its prolongation 735 feet, more or less, t'o the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the southwest, having a radius of 30 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 40 feet, more or less, to a point on the west line of Amador Plaza Road; thence northerly along said west line of Amador Plaza Road 130 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT 'OF BEGINNING. ~ Proposed Street Right-of-Way SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN ~MADOR PLAZA ROAD AND REGIONAL STREET Ail that certain real property situated in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the west line of Amador Plaza Road on the south line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Enea Plaza recorded December 19, 1980, as Instrument No. 80-224805, Records of Alameda County; thence northerly along said west line of Amador Plaza Road 167 feet, more or less, to a point easterly of the prolongation of the southern line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Robert T. and Betty J. Wolverton recorded December 20, 1978, as Instrument No. 78-248211, Records of Alameda County, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING for this description; thence continuing northerly along said west line of Amador Plaza Road to a point 68.00 feet north measured at right angles to said south line (78-248211) and its prolongation; thence westerly parallel with said south line and its prolongation a distance of 775 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Golden Gate Drive; thence leaving said centerline, on a course deflecting 5.6 degrees to the right 180 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 266.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 145 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 334.00 feet; thence along the arc of said reverse curve 180 feet, more or less, to a point on the east line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Peter B. Bedford recorded November 21, 1982, as Instrument No. 82- 193550, Records of Alameda County, said point hereon referred to as Point "A", lying South 4 feet, measured at right angles to, the prolongation of the south line of an existing warehouse lying on said Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence westerly on a course parallel with said south line of the existing warehouse 330 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the southeast, having a radius of 332.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 125 feet, more or less; thence southwesterly on a course tangent to the previous curve 130 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 266 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 120 feet, more or less, to a point on the south line of said Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence on a course tangent to the previous curve along said south line (82- 193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to the east line of Regional Street; thence leaving said south line (82-193550) southerly along said east line of Regional Street to a point 68.00 feet south, measured at right angles to said south line (82-193550); thence in an easterly direction parallel with said south line (82-193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less, ATTACHMENT the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 334.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 90 feet, more or less; thence northeasterly on a course tangent to the previous curve, 130 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 268.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 80 feet, more or less, to a point 68.00 feet south of, measured at right angles to, the prolongation of the south line of said existing warehouse lying within the Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence easterly parallel with said prolongation 330 feet, more or less, to a point south 64.00 feet from Point "A", at the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 266.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 142 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 334.00; thence along the arc of said reverse curve 175 feet, more or less; thence southeasterly 183 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Golden Gate Drive, said point lying west of the prolongation of the southern line of said Wolverton parcel (78-248211); thence easterly along said prolongation of said southern line (78-248211) a distance of 778 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.