Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 07-05-1989 ~ • ~ . ~ - Jul 5 1989 Re ular Meetin ular meeting of the City of Dublin PlYnning Commission was held on July The meeting was called to order A reg 5, 1989, in the Meeting Room, Dublin Li ra y at 7:35 p.m. by Cm. Barnes, Chairman. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ROL_ L GALL ~ Okun, and Zika; Laurence L. Tong, PRESENT: Commissioners Barnes, Burnham, Senior Planner; Maureen 0'Halloran, Senior Planning Director; Rod Barger, planning Secretary Planner; John Donahoe, Project Planner; and Gail Adams, ~ ~ ~ ~ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG led e of Cm. Barnes led the Commission, Staff, and those present in the p g allegiance to the flag. ADDITIONS OR REVI5ION5 TO THE AGENDA None ~ ~ ~ ~c CONSENT CALENDAR 1989 were 5.1 Minutes of Previous Meetings - The minutes of June 5, approved. The minutes of June 19,~g899 were held over until the July 17, meeting. 5 2 pA 88-117 Doyle Variance - Approved ~ ~ ~ ~ ORAL COMMtTNICATIONS None ~ ~ ~ ~ WRITTEN COMMUNICATION5 ealable and final Mr. Tong advised that the Commission had received various app action letters. ~XXX'KT X ~X)~X~' ~XX'~X'X ~X~ti7~C~Y' ~X7C7Y ~X ~X ~X'~K'X7~C~'XX~ ~X'~X''~C'~~7~C'~~C~Y~F' ~X7C~ ~X ~XXT'X'X~'7~C~Y~Y ~X ~X~:~~T'i:~'TJulyX 5 ,x1989~~~:sc PCM-8-101 Reguiar Meeting • . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS SUBJECT: PA 89-037 Valle Nissan Mitsubishi Conditional Use Fermit extension re uest to maintain the existin use of automobile dealershi s at 6015-6015B Scarlett Court continued from the June 19, 1989 meeting) Cm. Barnes opened the public hearing and called for the Staff Report. Mr. Barger indicated that on June 19, 1989, the Commission held a public hearing regarding this application, however, there wa5 nobody present to represent the Applicant so the Commission continued the matter to tonight's meeting. Mr. Barger indicated that Chris Regalia, representative for Valley Nissan, was in the audience to answer any questions the Planning Commission might have. He stated that there had been a management change regently and tpe~icationeral Manager was not aware of the scheduled public hearin for this a p Mr. Barger indicated that all pertinent agencies h~~ rrovewthetapplicationlfor and Staff was recommending the Planning Commission app three years. The Applicant may request an administrative extension for an additional two years from the Planning Director. Chris Regalia, representing Valley Nissan, apologized for not having som~one in attendance at the last Commission meeting. He stated that he would be happy to answer any questions the Commission might have. Cm. Burnham asked Mr. Regalia if there was any conflict in the approval's time frame. Mr. Regalia indicated that they owned the property and saw no problems with the time frame. Cm. Okun asked what the criteria was for having the extension for three years instead of two. Mr. Barger indicated that it was appropriate to grant a three year approval since this business had been operating in compliance with City standards for a number of years now. Cm. Barnes closed the public hearing. On motion from Cm. Burnham, seconded bedCm. Zika, and with a vote of 4-0 (one absent), the Planning Commission adop RESOLUTION N0. 89-032 APPROVING PA 89-037 VALLEY NISSAN/MITSUBISHI CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION REQUEST TO MAINTA AT 6015X 015B SCARLETT ACOURT BILE DEALERSHIPS x~Yx~'c~Cxxx~'cxxxx~~'cxx~Y~Y~'c~'cx~cx 3c~Yx~YsYx~Y~'cxx~~'c~Y~c'~Y~Y~'cxx~'c'~Y~'c'#x~Y~Y~Y~Y~'rx~'c~'r~'c~Y~Y~'c~Yx.TU~.y~' S~, X' 1.~ 89'^scxx Regular Meeting PCM-8-102 , ' • • SUBJECT: PA 88-139 Crown Chevrolet Conditional Use Permit/Site Development Review for exterior car storage and parking on approximately 1.97 acres of vacant land located on Golden Gate Drive, south of 7544 Dublin Boulevard (continued from the June 5, 1989 meeting) Cm. Barnes opened the public hearing and called for the Staff Report. Mr. Tong introduced John Donahoe. Mr. Donahoe would be taking Trudi Ryan's place as Ms. Ryan had accepted a position with the City of Sunnyvale. Mr. Donahoe indicated that this item had been continued from the June 5, 1989 meeting. The Applicant had revised the site plan to show deletion of the proposed employee/customer parking and revision of the storage area from 102 vehicles to 118. This revised plan indicated that only the northern half af the property would be used. Mr. Donahoe indicated that the Commission had requested Staff to prepare revised resolutions and conditions of approval to include a 10 foot wide landscaping strip on the east and west sides of the storage area and the permitted use of gravel surface for that storage area. Mr. Donahoe indicated that the City Engineer had concerns regarding the gravel surface of the storage area because the gravel could be tracked into the public street. The City Engineer suggested that the surface be base rock layer with a chip seal surface and prevent public street access from the storage area. Mr. Donahoe indicated that the Applicant wished to fence around the entire parcel and Staff had no problems with that request. The Staff recommendation, however, would be to have the Applicant fence the southern portion of the storage area to prevent unauthorized parking and storage on the unimproved portion of the site. This condition would be required regardless if the Applicant fenced the entire parcel or not. Mr. Donahoe indicated that the Commission needed to rnake findings on Item #d, g and h for the Conditional Use Permit and Item A and D of the Site Development Review to enable the project to be consistent with the general intent of Downtown Specific Plan. Cm. Zika asked what the purpose would be of having a fence installed in the middle of the lot. Mr. Donahoe indicated that the fence would restrict the parking of cars outside of the improved area. Mr. Pat Costello, Applicant, indicated that an additional fence in the center of the site wouid be too expensive. He indicated that there would not be any additional public traffic. This was private parking for the storage of vehicles. k~~~~~~~~~~x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Yk~x~Y Regular Meeting PCM-8-103 July 5, 1989 , ~ ~ Mr. Costello discussed Exhibit D(Site Development Review). He had concerns over the required 35' width opening of the gate. He saw no problems with keeping the gate at 20'. He indicated that if this was a mandatory requirement, then he would go ahead and change the gate, however, there was no significant impact from the traffic engineer's point of view. Mr. Costello discussed the landscaping and gravel surface issues. He indicated that there wouid be new automobiles stored on the lot and the gravel surface with oil did not seem appropriate. He requested that a loose gravel base rock that was almost dust free be substituted. Ms. Woolverton indicated that Mr. Costello was very much aware where cars were being stored and saw no reason for the additional fence. Mr. Costello indicated that it did not make sense to spend a lot af money at this time. He stated that the curbing would be too expensive as well as the landscaping requirements. Cm. Zika asked if the public street had to be crossed to get to the lot. Mr. Costello indicated no. Cm. Zika indicated that he was in favor of the one year permit and since nobody knows when BART is coming in, did not feel that it was appropriate for the Applicant to have to spend a lot of money at this time. He asked Staff if a violation could be issued if the storage area was not used properly. Mr. Tong indicated yes. The storage area was limited to the storing of vehicles. If the fence was installed, the Applicant would only have to drive through a gate insetad of having an open area. Cm. Zika asked if a violation could cause the Conditional Use Permit to be voided. Mr. Tong indicated yes. Cm. Burnham concurred with Cm. Zika. He indicated that the more money the Applicant puts into the property, the more the City will need to pay to acquire it. He had no problem with the gravel surface. He asked Staff why the gate had to be 35 feet. Mr. Donahoe indicated that this condition was in the original Staff Report and would make it access easier for trucks. Cm. Burnham indicated that 20 feet seemed efficient. Cm. Barnes reiterated that this lot was for storage only and Mr. Costello was required to keep the area weed free. She saw no reason for trucks to be back in the storage area. Mr. Costello indicated that trucks have been using the 20 foot gate and had not had any problems. Cm. Burnham asked if there was a violation clause in the conditions of approval. ~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~r~c~~~c~~~~~~~s~~~~~~c~~~~~~~c~~~~r~~~~~c~~~e~, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~c~~~~~~~x~~~ti~ Regular Meeting PCM-8-104 July 5, 1989 • ! . Mr. Tong indicated there was no condition of approval stating that vehicles could be parked there. The Comrnission requested Staff to add Condition #27 to Exhibit C(Conditional Use Permit) which would state, "There will be no vehicle parking or storing of materials located on the undeveloped southern 1.0 acre portion of the site". On motion from Cm. Zika, seconded by Cm. Okun, with a vote of 4-0 (one absent), the Planning Commission adopted RESOLUTION N0. 89-033 ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR PA 88-139 CROWN CHEVROLET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, GOLDEN GATE DRIVE, SOUTH OF 7544 DUBLIN BOULEVARD Mr. Donahoe indicated that the Downtown Specific Plan was not consistent with the conditions of approval of the Conditional Use Permit and the Commission would need to find that the approval was for a temporary use only. The Commission supported findings that the use was "temporary". Mr. Donahoe indicated that the 9th Whereas had a error. The first July date would need to be changed to June. On motion from Cm. Okun, requesting the date correction, the addition of Condition #27 and Condition #16 to allow a gravel surface, seconded by Cm. Burnham, and with a vote of 4-0 (one absent), the Planning Commission adopted RESOLUTION N0. 89-034 APPROVING PA 88-139 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR THE CfLOWN CHEVROLET ON GOLDEN GATE DRIVE SOUTH OF 7544 DUBLIN BOULEVARD Cm. Burnham requested that Condition #6 of Exhibit D(Site Development Review) be eliminated and revision to Condition #13 to eliminate additional fence requirement. On motion from Cm. Zika, with language revisions to Condition #6 and #13, seconded by Cm. Burnham, and with a vote of 4-0 (one absent), the Planning Commission adopted RESOLUTION N0. 89-035 APPROVING THE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST FQR PA 88-139 CROWN CHEVROLET ON GOLDEN GATE DRIVE, SOUTH OF 7544 DUBLIN BOULEVARD Mr. Costello indicated that there were conditions in the Site Development Review that should be discussed. The Planning Commission and Staff discussed the correct procedures for reopening the public hearing. The public hearing was re-opened. Mr. Costello requested clarification on Condition of Approval #C, Attachment A, of the Site Development Review. ~x~: x~Yx~tc~Yxx~'c~Yx~x~~'c~'c~'e~'c~'c~Y~nt~'c~c~Y~Y~'x~c~e~'c~Y~~~'c9c~Y~Y~Y~e~'r~x~Yk~Y~Y~Y~~xx~e~Y~Y~x~Y~Yx~Yxx~Yx~c~'ez'r~'r~'c~Yxx~sYx7F Regular Meeting PGM-8-105 July S, 1989 ~ ~ Mr. Tong indicated that these were standards conditions, however this application was unique in that it was not considered a parking lot. The Planning Commission and Staff discussed the standard conditions of approval (Attachment A) and decided that Staff would work with the Applicant. The public hearing was closed and the approvals were taken as stands. SUBJECT: PA 89-047 Goldies Fitness Plus Commercial Recreation Facility Conditional Use Permit request to allow continued operation of a commercial recreation facility (health/ fitness center) at 7164 Regional Street Cm. Barnes opened the public hearing and called for the Staff Report. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that this application was for a Conditional Use Permit. The fitness center had been operating without an approved Conditional Use Permit since 1979. The Applicant was unaware of the requirement for an approved Conditional Use Permit. During the last 10 years, the Planning Department had not received any zoning complaints. The Planning Department was unaware that the fitness center was operating without an approved use permit. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that the center operates Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m, and 8:00 p.m, and on Saturday from 9:00 a.m. through 12 noon. There is an estimate of 125 people who utilize the facility on the weekdays and approximately 35 people on Saturday. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that all appropriate agencies and departments have reviewed the application and the proposal is consistent with the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan. Staff recommends that the Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit until July 19, 1992. Cm. Zika asked how the Staff had found out that the fitness center was operating without a permit. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that the appliaant was in the process of selling the business and an individual interested in the business had contacted the City to determine whether the use was a permitted use in its present location. Mr. Brad Gilbertson, Applicant, indicated that he would be happy to answer any questions the Commission might have. Cm. Barnes closed the public hearing. Cm. Zika suggested the permit be for one year with two 2-year extensions. Cm. Barnes re-opened the public hearing. Mr. Gilbertson indicated that part of the final sale of the business required a 5-year lease and had concerns about the one year permit. He indicated that the buyer seemed confortable with the three year permit approval and discussed the financial background of the business. ~~r~~~~~~~~r~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~r~~~t~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~x~~~x~ti~~z. Regular Meeting PCM-8-106 July 5, 1989 ~ • Cm. Zika had concerns regarding a new buyer with a new business. Cm. Barnes concurred with Gm. Zika. Mr. Tong indicated that this was a typically 3-5 year permit approval and was comfortable with conditions of approval. He indicated that the Applicant did not need to discuss the business sale with Staff and had the Commission not known, the 3-5 year permit would have been okay. He indicated that Conditional Use Perraits run with the land and are not tied to a specific property or business owner. Cm. Burnham indicated that the business had been around for some time and would go along with Staff's recommendations. Cm. Okun concurred with Cm. Burnham. Cm. Barnes closed the public hearing. On motion from Cm. Burnham, seconded by Cm. Okun, with a vote of 3-1 (one absent), the Planning Commission adopted RESOLUTION N0. 84-036 APPROVING PA 89-047 GOLDIES FITNESS PLUS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO CONTINUE OPERATION OF A COMMERCIAL RECREATION FACILITY (HEALTH/FITNESS CENTER) AT 7164 REGIONAL STREET Cm. Barnes indicated that she voted with the Staff recommendations because of the revocable clause in item #8 and she trusted the new owner wauld comply with the conditions of approval and requirements of the zoning district. SUBJECT: PA 89-058 Southexn Pacific Conditional Use Permit/Site Development Review request to construct a gasoline pump station and power and control center at 6433 Dougherty Road Cm. Barnes opened the public hearing and called for the Staff Report. Mr. Barger indicated that the application was a request for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review to install an unmanned gasoline pump station at 6433 Dougherty Road on the old Southern Pacific Railroad right-of- way. The facility would be located outdoors behind a solid ehainlink fence and be east of the American Building Gomponents construction yard and west of Parks Military Training Reserve. Mr. Barger indicated that the site could be accessed by a 20' wide private road feeding from Dougherty Road. The station would be located approximately 1400 feet away from Dougherty Road out of direct public view. Mr. Barger indicated that there would be two electric motor drive pumps, one with 1250 horsepower, one with 1500. There would be a power control center building and transformer also on the site. Mr. Barger indicated that this was not your typical gas station. Gasoline would not be stored or dispensed on the site. This facility serves as a booster station to assist in the transfer of gasoline through pipes located ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~r*~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~F Regular Meeting PCM-8-107 July 5, 1989 . . ~ underground along the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way between San Jose and Concord. This eliminates the need of using heavy trucks for gasoline transportation. Mr. Barger indicated that Southern Pacific Pipelines has been identified as a public utility, serving as an underground transporter of gasoline for gas companies. A fee is charged for this service and the company is not involved in the sale or purchase of gasoline. Mr. Barger indicated that the company has a emergency response plan in effect to deal with any potential leaks, spills, ruptures, fires etc. The company will continuously monitor the facility and if a problem occurs, the company would be able to respond within one-half hour. The company has been in operation for 28 years. Mr. Barger indicated that all pertinent agencies have reviewed the application and no problems have been identified. He indicated that the proposed use was consistent with the intent of the M-1 zoning district and Staff recomends the Commission approve the draft resolutions of approval. Mr. Barger indicated that representatives from Southern Pacific Pipelines were in the audience. Cm. Okun asked if this was a new Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Barger indicated yes. Cm. Zika asked if the 6 foot fence was appropriate. Mr. Barger indicated that a 6 foot fence was typical, however the Commission could require a higher fence. Cm. Zika was concerned over the height of the fenee and thought a higher fence would give added protection. Cm. Burnham had concerns over vandalism and graffiti. Mr. Art Thomassen, Applicant, described the business and installation of the pump station. He indicated that the pump station was needed to transport gas for oil and military companies and there was an increased gasoline demand in the San Jose area. Mr. Thomassen indicated that this was an unmanned station and was routinely maintained. He indicated that the Department of Transportation had safety regulations that his company has to adhere to which includes having an emergency response plan. The Company has state-of-the-art technology and the station would be shutdown and investigations held if an emergency occurred, Mr. Thomessen indicated that typically, razor wire would be installed on the top of the fence. He requested that Condition #5 regarding handicap access be eliminated. He stated that an unmanned pump station would not require handicap access. ~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~x~ Regular Meeting PCM-8-108 July 5, 1989 • ~ ~ Cm. Zika asked if there was ventilation for gas fumes. Mr. Thomessen indicated that there was no storage of gasoline at the site. There was an underground sump - storage tank that had ventilation. Mr. Bob Cardinal, representative, described the mechanics of the sump pump. Cm. Zika asked if the company had any vandalism problems. Mr. Thomessen indicated no, only pot shots at their facilities in the desert areas. He indicated that the station would be designed in compliance with Department of Transportation's regulations and would be very difficult for a child to do a lot of damage. The Commission and Applicant discussed the safety response time procedures. Marie Cronin asked about psi ratings and the diameter measurements for the pipes. Mr. Thomessen indicated that it had 1300 psi with maximum 10 inch diameter pipes. Cm. Zika asked if there was any problem with eliminating the handicap access requirement. Mr. Barger indicated that he would talk with the Building Official to verify this. However, this condition of approval could be required by the State. Cm. Okun indicated that there were no discussion of safety measures in the conditions of approval. Mr. Thomessen indicated that the State and Fire Marshall regulated safety measures and conditions. Cm. Barnes closed the public hearing. On motion from Cm. Burnham, seconded by Cm. Zika, with a vote of 4-0 (one absent), the Planning Commission adopted RESOLUTION N0. 89-037 ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PA 89-058 SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPELINES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A GASOLINE PUMP STATION AND POWER CONTROL CENTER AT 6433 DOU~HERTY ROAD On motion from Cm. Okun, seconded by Cm. Burnham, with a vote of 4-0 (one absent), the Planning Commission adopted RESOLUTION N0. 89-038 APPROVING PA 89-058 SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPELINES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A GASOLINE PUMP STATION AND POWER AND CONTROL CENTER BUILDING AT 6433 DOUGHERTY ROAD On motion from Cm. Zika, with the appropriate revision to Condition #5 by Staff, seconded by Cm. Burnham, with a vote of 4-0 (one absent), the Planning Commission adopted ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~*~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-x~ Regular Meeting PCM-8-109 July S, 1989 . . i ~ RESOLUTION N0. 89-039 APPROVING PA 89-058 SOUTHERN PACIFIC PIPELINES SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A GASOLINE PUMP STATION AND POWER AND CONTROL CENTER BUILDING AT 6433 DOUGHERTY ROAD SUBJECT: PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon (Blaylock, Gleason & Fletcher) General Plan Amendment request to include approximately 197 acres of project site within the City's Primary Planning Area, to designate 19.1 acres for medium-high density residential, 13 acres for single-family residential and 164.9 acres for open space. Subsequent applications pendin~ General Plan Amendment action will include Planned Development Prezoning, Subdivision and Annexation (continued from the June 19, 1989 meeting) The public hearing had been closed at the June 19, 1989 meeting. The Commission would be discussing only the fiscal analysis and geotechnical report issues. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that at the June 19th meeting, the Commission discussed the Draft and Final EIR, the proposed General Plan Amendment and proposed land use designation and density. The Commission had directed Staff to begin preparation of the EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program, provide additional information on the fiscal analysis sectian, and provide comments on the appropriate timing for requiring specific geotechnical reports. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that EIP, the City's environmental consultant, spoke with the City Manager and Finance Direct in re-evaluating the fiscal impacts of the proposed project. EIP has rewritten the fiscal analysis section of the EIR to incorporate all new changes. Letter #14 has been replaced. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that the re-evaluation resulted in 1) a decrease in the estimated recreation cost from $18,325 to $11,388; 2) an increase in the sales tax revenue from $89,245 to $99,521 due to the actual sale tax receipts for 1987-1988; and 3) a decrease in the general government cost from $40,376 to $37,352. This resulted in a decrease in the cost/reveneue balance from a negative $14,902 to a positive $3,267. She noted that unit costs were based on estimates the Applicant provided for 1987-88, the time period consistent with figures used in determining the other items. Given the rise in housing costs, the costs of these units are likely to be higher at the time of actual sale, which will increase property tax revenue. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that the Public Service Section of the Draft EIR has been revised to include 1) DRFA as a joint powers authority between Dublin and San Ramon; 2) the 1.5 mile response limit for DRFA; 3) the $6Q0 per unit fire impact fee required to be pad by the developer; 4) the potential need for an additional fir station; and 5) a mitigation requiring Class B or better roofs and Class A or non-cambustible roofs for the 17 single-family units. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that the City Manager has reviewed and concurred with the figures presented for the revised fiscal analysis section. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the revised Fiscal Analysis and Public Services Section of the Final EIR are complete and adequate. ~~~Y~Y~Y~'c~Y~Y~~FyF~c~t~Y~Y~Y~Y~Y~~~'c:c~~c~Y~'e~Y~Y~Y~Y~~c~'e~e~Y~Yx~~e~e~Y k~Y~k~Y~Y~~~~e~'e~.e~'e~'ex~Y~Y~: ~+n'r~c~Y~Y~Y~Y~: ~~'e~Y~~'rsti~~r~': xsY Regular Meeting PCM-8-110 July S, 1989 . ~ ~ Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that the Public Works Director, Building Official, and a Geologist from EIP have reviewed and commented on the Geology and Soils Section of the Draft EIR. She indicated that the concensus is that it is premature to do detailed studies at the General Plan Amendment stage. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that land use designation would not equate to approval of development plans for the site. The Tentative Map and Prezoning stage would determine where within the land use designation development should occur. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that Staff recommends the Commission find that the Geology and Soils section of the Draft and Final EIR are complete and adequate. She then indicated that the Commission needed to direct Staff to 1) prepare a resolution relating to the Commission's recommendation on the completeness and adequacy of the EIR; 2) prepare a resolution relating to the Commission's recommendation on the EIR Monitoring Program and 3) prepare a resolution relating to the Commission recommendatian on the General Plan Amendment. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that the General Plan Amendment recommendation would include the project site within primary planning area and consistency with existing general plan policies. The proposed land use designations are 1) low density single-family with 0.5 to 3.8 dwelling units per acre; 2) medium high density with 14.1 to 25 dwelling units per acre and 3) 164.9 acres of open space. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that Jennifer Toth from EIP was in the audience if the Commission had any questions or concerns. Cm. Zika asked for clarification on land use designation and zoning. Mr. Tong clarified that land use designations would be recommended at this time. The actual zoning of the property would occur afterwards. The prezoning is more precise. Mike Gleason, Applicant, concurred with the Staff's recommendation and ask~d the Commission to adopt the resolutions of approval. Cm. Okun indicated that there seemed to be a big turnaround in the fiscal analysis. Ms. 0'Hallaran indicated that the fiscal analysis was re-evaluated using the most current and available information contained in the new City budget. Cm. Okun asked how stable the figures were. Ms. 0'Halloran stated that the figures were based on the most current information available. She indicated that the figures could change as the project is developed, however, at this point in time rhe figures are accurate based upon actual cost of items during 1987-88. Mr. Tong cautioned the Commission not to use the fiscal analysis as permanent figures. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~x~~~~~~x~x~~x:~~~~~~~~ Regular Meeting PCM-8-111 July 5, 1989 . . • • Ms. Jennifer Toth, EIP, indicated that she was confident that the figures were accurate. Cm. Okun asked about the status of the mitigation monitoring program. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that the rnonitoring program was being prepared and would have to be reviewed by the City Attorney. Mr. Tong indicated that Staff would be able to present the monitoring program to the Commission at the July 17th meeting. Ms. 0'Halloran indicated that the Commission needed to give Staff specific direction on how to proceed regarding the completeness of the EIR, the recommendation for the resolution of approval for the Monitoring Program and the General Plan Amendment. The Commission concurred with Staff's recommendation and requested Staff to proceed with the preparation of the re5olutions of approval. The Cornrnission continued the item to the July 17, 1989 meeting. ~ ~ ~ ~ NEW BUSINESS OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS Mr. Tong indicated that Donlan Canyon, Kassibian Motors, and Jimmy 0'Gills will be heard at the July 17, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Tong indicated that at the last City Council meeting, the Council appraved the budget. He stated the Council had approved compensation for the Planning Commission that would amount to $30.00 a meeting, not to exceed three meetings a month. ~ ~ ~ ~ OTHER BUSINESS None ~ ~ ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONCERNS Crn, Okun stated that he had received an invitation for the dedication of Aolan Park and asked what the status was on the park renovation. Mr. Tong indicated that the Recreation Department would be able to answer any questions regarding the park. Cm. Burnham had concerns regarding the alignment of the new section of San Ramon Road. Cm. Burnham had concerns regarding BART. He felt that the Planning Connrnission might have some questions regarding BART issues and would like to be able to voice these concerns to the City Council ~x~YsYxxxx~Y~x~xsc~xstisc~~x~Fxxxxx~Y~'cxxx~Fxx~~ti~Y~Yx~c~Yxxx~c~c~F~rx~'r>Y~.cx~x k~Yx~kx~Yxstistisc~c~~~'r~Ys'rx~x:t~z: ~'~x Regular Meeting PCM-8-112 July 5, 1989 ~ • Cm. Zika requested that the Planning Commission be informed of all BAR.T proceedings concerning the Dublin stations. Cm. Barnes stated that someone had decorated Amador Valley Boulevard with flags to represent the July 4th holiday and thought this was a nice addition to the street. ~ ~ ~ ~ ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:27 p.m. ~ ~ ~ ~ Respectfully submitted, Planning Commissio on Laurence L. Tong Planning Director ~ ~ ~ ~ xs:~x~:k~Fx~Y~Yx~x:c:rsF~xx~~~:x~cT°xs~x~Yx~Yzc~x~xx~Yx~Y~~~~Y~'cxx~Y~c~sYsY~M~tiscsY~Yscxx~FT~xx: ~Ysck~Yxxstix~ti:C:::c^~x~i': Regular Meeting PCM-8-113 July 5, 1989