Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Mtg Minutes 05-19-1986 .Y' . ~ ~ Regular Meeting - May 19, 1986 A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commission was held on May 19, 1986, in the Meeting Room, Dublin Library. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Cm. Ma~k, Chairperson. * * * * ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners Barnes, Burnham, Petty, Mack, and Raley, Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director and Kevin J. Gailey, Senior Planner. * * * * PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cm. Mack led the Commission, Staff, and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. * * * * MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the regular meeting of May 5, 1986, were approved as presented. * * * * ORAL COMMUNICATION None. * * * * WRITTEN COP~IMUNICATION Mr. Tong said the Commissioners had received various action letters for Barons Jewelers, Circus Vargas, Waterbed Factory, and Standard Brands Paints. * * * * Regular Meeting PCM-6-5~ May 19, 1986 - ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: PA 86-010.1 and .2 Pu1te Home Corporation - Betlen Drive Planned Development (PD) Rezonin and Subdivision Map (Tentative Map 5588) requests for a planned development with 44 proposed sinqle family residential lots involving an 8.4+ acre ro erty located along the south side of the terminus of Betlen Drive in the southwest corner of the City of Dublin. Cm. Mack opened the public hearing and referred to a letter from Michael Milani, Project Manager for Pulte Homes, dated May 16, 1986, requesting a continuance of the hearing. Mr. Tong advised the Commission they had the option of taking any of the following actions: grant the continuance and not hear public testimony, hear public testimony and continue the item, or hear public testimony and take action on the project. Cm. Raley inquired if the Applicant had made any changes in the original proposal. Mr. Engle, Pulte Homes Representative, said they are requesting the continuance be granted until the June 16, 1986, meeting. He said they were reviewing the plans with the intent of revising them for a lesser number of units than originally requested. He indicated that the additional time would allow them to reassess the market information, put together a revised presentation for the Commission, and attempt to set up a meeting with the property owners in the vicinity of the project in order to address the issues of concern raised by those property owners. Mr. Tom Fahey, Betlen Drive resident, expressed concern about continuing the public hearing. He said that it may be difficult for people who have scheduled vacations to be present at the next hearing if it is continued. He stated that, in his opinion, if the continuance were granted, it would be better for the homeowners if it were scheduled for the June 2, 1986, meeting. - Elliot Healy, 11362 Betlen Drive, requested assurance that enough advance notification of the next meeting be supplied to insure that homeowners are able to be in attendance at that meeting. Mr. Gailey advised that if any substantive changes are made to the plans, Staff would need to redistribute them to responsible agencies for review and comment, and should that occur, the hearing date of June 16th may even be difficult to make. Lee Stoffiger, 1162 Betlen Drive, indicated there may be a problem with summer vacations. He stated that he thought the changes to the project previously recommended by the Planning Commission should be made. Regular Meeting PCM-6-5~ May 19, 1986 ; ` • • Mr. Gailey requested that anyone in attendance who did not live within the 300-foot radius of the subject property, and who did not receive notification of the previous hearing, provide the Planning Department with their names and addresses to insure they are notified of the next public hearing. Mrs. Fahey inquired if any changes had actually been made to the plans. Mr. Gailey said no new materials had been submitted, but that the Applicants have indicated their intent to do so. Betty Moore, 11292 Betlen Drive, said she would be out of the Country at the time the next hearing is held and expressed concern that she would not have an opportunity to review the revised proposal. Cm. Mack suggested she submit any comments she may have to the Commission in writing. Mr. Gailey said a spokesperson could be designated, and the Staff could provide them with copies of new plans for distribution among the homeowners. He reviewed the process which would have to be followed after the Planning Commission takes action on the proposal. By consensus of the Planning Commission, the public hearing was continued to the meeting of June 16, 1986. SUBJECT: PA $6-040 Ozzie Davis - Pontiac/Toyota Car Dealership (6450 Dublin Court) • Temporary Promotional Advertisin Displays Conditional Use Permit for use of temporary promotional advertisin displays for a maximum cumulative period of sixty days within a 12-month period. Cm. Mack opened the public hearing and read a letter xeceived from Ozzie Davis, dated May 16, 1986, requesting that the hearing be continued until the meeting of June 2, 1986. By consenus of the Commission, the public hearing was continued until June 2, 1 986. * * * * NEW BUSINESS SUBJECT: Planninq Commission Meetin Format Revisions Mr. Tong said this topic had been placed on the agenda as a follow-up to the Planning Commission meeting of May 5, 1986. He referred to the Draft Planning Commission Rules of Procedure, the Existing Planning Commission Rules of Procedure, the Draft Planning Commission Procedures Summary and the Draft Speaker Slips which were included in the packet. Mr. Tong reviewed the revisions which had been made to the Dublin Planning Commission Rules of Procedures. The Commission requested that the following Regular Meeting PCM-6-60 May 19, 1986 ' . , ~ ~ ~ V.4., the words "to the Agenda" be added after "Additions or ReVisions"; and on the same page, item VI. B., the words "or approve" be added to the end of the second sentence. There was discussion concerning the use of Speaker Slips, and Mr. Tong said they would be submitted to the Chairperson for review; the Chairperson would then either indicate that a written communication had been received, or read in its entirety the information contained on the Speaker Slip. Cm. Raley moved, Cm. Barnes seconded, and by a unanimous voice vote, the revised Planning Commission Rules of Procedure, the Planning Commission Procedures Summary, and the Speaker Slips were adopted as amended. * * * * OTHER BUSINESS In response to a question from Cm. Raley, Mr. Tong said he has not received any comments from the City Council regarding the concerns raised by Cm. Raley about the Tri-Valley Planning Citizens' Committee. He advised that this topic will be on the next City Council agenda. * * * * PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S CONCERNS Cm. Burnham asked if the mobile pet clinic had been held. Mr. Tong advised that it did not occur, and that a representative of the clinic was at the site to let customers know the clinic would not be held. He said that the Planning Commission's decision had been appealed by Councilmember Moffatt. Cm. Raley referred to the sign which refers to the historical church being a point of interest; he stated that the word "interest" had been misspelled on the sign. * * * * ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Res ct lly submitted, ~ ~ _ f ~ ann'ng ommission Chairperson Laurence L. Tong Planning Director Regular Meeting PCM-6-61 May 19, 1986