Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC MInutes 03-05-1984 • • j r a ~ Regular Meeting - March 5, 1984 A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commission was held on March 5, 1984, in the Meeting Roam, Dublin Library. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Cm. Tenery, Chairman. * * * * ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners Alexander, Vonheeder, Petty, Mack, and Tenery, Thomas P. DeLuca, Associate Planner, and Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director. * * * * PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Cm. Tenery led the Commission, Staff, and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. * * * * MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the regular meetings of February 6, 1984, and February 21, 1984, were approved as written. * * * * ORAL COMMUNICATION Mr. Charles Minshell, a Ladera Court resident, spoke briefly regarding his opposition to the Kaufman & Broad project. He protested the density of the project and felt that the housing was not compatible with the area. Mr. Fernando Uribe, a Padre Way resident, asked questions regarding the course of action which might be taken to prevent this development. Mr. Tong responded that the proposal is not within the City Limits of Dublin, and is being reviewed by Alameda County. He noted that the Alameda County Planning Staff will be holding hearings regarding this project on March 13, 1984, and at that time, Dublin residents may voice concerns to the County. * * * * WRITTEN COMMUNICATION Cm. Mack questioned the status of the denial of the Variance request by Mr. McCartney (PA 83-060). Mr. Tong indicated that the Applicant is appealing the Zoning Administrator's decision. ~ ~ * * * * UNFINISHED BUSINESS None * * * * PUBLIC HEARING PA 84-003 YEN (LITTLE KID'S LEARNING CENTER RENEWAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mr. DeLuca introduced the application for renewal of a Conditional Use Permit for a daycare/pre-school facility. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve Mr. Yen's request for renewal of the permit to operate a preschool and daycare facility, for a maximum of 95 children, at 11760 Dublin Blvd. Mr. Yen was present and explained that, when he purchased the property in 1981, he was unaware of the December 13, 1983, expiration date of the County-approved Conditional Use Permit. When he was informed that the permit had expired, he promptly filed for a renewal. Mr. Don Hoffman, owner of 11820-11828 Dublin Blvd., noted that the school does create traffic problems in the early morning and evening hours, and encouraged a condition that a curb and gutter be installed, to alleviate traffic and drainage problems. He offered to work with Mr. Yen to mitigate those problems. After the close of the public hearing Cm. Alexander questioned Staff regarding the property line with relation to the existing trees on the Dublin Blvd. frontage. Mr. DeLuca assured the Commission that the sidewalk would be on public property, while the trees are on private property. r~ There was a discussion regarding a need for an -foot high fence on the rear perimeter of the property. The discussion continued regarding the need for landscaping along the entire northern and eastern perimeter line of the property. It was determined that additional landscaping would be subject to Planning Commission review concurrently with development of the adjacent parcels. It was also agreed that trees would be required only along the residential property bordering the westerly property line of the site. These requirements were added as additional conditions of approval. ~ ~ Cm. Alexander made the motion, with Cm. Vonheeder's second to approve the renewal of the Conditional Use Permit, with an additional condition to cut and maintain the ivy surrounding the trees, fronting on Dublin Blvd., at ground level. The motion passed by unanimous vote. RES~LUTION 84-11 APPROVING PA 84-003 CHSANG YEN'S (LITTLE KID'S LEARNING CENTER) RENEWAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A DAYCARE AND PRESCHOOL FACILITY * * * * CITY OF DUBLIN 6ENERAL PLAN Mr. Tong introduced Mr. John Blayney, General Plan Consultant, and gave a brief history regarding development of the General Plan, which was, at this time, being presented in Draft form. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission hear presentations from Staff, Mr. Blayney, and the public, and then continue the Public Hearing to a later date for further discussion. Mr. Blayney explained the General Plan Vol. 1: Plan Policies. He displayed maps illustrating land within the City Limits, as well as that within the Dublin Sphere of Influence, reminding the Commission that the General Plan is still in draft form, and that the structure of the General Plan, as well as the type and cost of housing available, is largely mandated by the State. Cm. Tenery extended appreciation to Mr. Blayney and his staff for work completed to this date. Mr. Pete Smietana, 11672 Harlan Rd., commented on his perception of the "devastation of Dublin", and expressing disappointment in "cheap housing" development in specific areas of the City, and stated there is a great need for parkland within the City. He felt that providing children with a good education is more important than providing them with 'starter homes'. Cm. Alexander commented that the Planning Cornmission had recommended that a park be established on the Dolon School site. It was his contention that a good education would not necessarily guarantee young people a good place to live. Cm. Vonheeder agreed that, by State mandate, the City needs to provide avenues for people, young and old, and of all economic levels, to obtain and maintain adequate housing. Dennis Ransdell, a Silvergate resident, felt that a radical change in density was the issue being resisted. He felt that the General Plan does not offer a proper balance of housing. He continued by questioning whether or not public comments would, in fact, be heeded in the development of the General Plan. • ~ Harry Demmel, a Silvergate resident, felt that there is a great need in Dublin for open space, parks, and recreation land. He noted that one thing that does help higher-density areas survive is the availability of parks and recreation areas. He stated that the Planning Commissioners should be allowed, and encouraged, to speak at City Council meetings. Cm. Vonheeder emphasized her agreement with Mr. Demmel's statements regarding the need for parks. She reiterated the Planning Commission's desire to create more parkland within the City with the City Council's reversal of their recommendations. Tanya Clark, Gardella Drive resident, stated that she felt that the City Council is also in favor of additional parks. Mr. Blayney reminded the audience that, while the City Council may be in favor of more parkland, they also have the responsibility of maintaining a balanced budget, as well as maintaining their obligations to future residents. Mr. Paul Dillon, a Castillian Way resident, voiced opposition to multifamily or high density housing. Ms. Dorothy Wisecoff, a Ladera Court resident, commented that she had contacted the County Planning Department regarding the Kaufman and Broad project, and felt that the units planned for that project were expensive and would not provide low-cost housing for Dublin residents. Mr. George Williams voiced an opinion that the already existing parks appear to be under-utilized. He further opposed site- specific information contained within the General Plan. Mr. Glenn Walter, a Wallom Place resident, was pleased to see medium- and low-cost housing planned, but feared that approval of the Draft General Plan would be hurried and might not allow community input. Ms. Jane Meyer, 11711 Betlen Dr., agreed that there should be more time for public input. Mr. Dan Rodriguez, 6851 Ione Way, commented on the density issue, and Mr. Blayney noted that it was typical for more mature cities. Fernanda Uribe, a Padre Way resident, felt that Dublin should not shoulder responsibility of starter-housing for the Tri-Valley area. Mr. Virgil Howard, 7575 Amador Valley Blvd., voiced a strong opinion regarding the apparently low opinion, of Dublin residents', toward renters and multifamily-unit dwellers. There were several general comments regarding an awareness that multifamily does not necessarily equal low-cost or cheap. ~ ~ Stan Harrop, 7536 Calle Verde, discouraged a quick approval of the General Plan because he felt that the citizens of Dublin have not yet been heard. Vivian Kahn, representing the Bay Area Council, addressed the Commission, explaining the Council's membership and expressing concerns over Dublin's capacity to produce jobs exceeding its capacity to produce housing. Ted Fairfield, Civil Engineer, representing 760 acres within the City, and 807+ acres outside the City Limits but within Dublin's planning area, distributed a map, a geological study, and a letter to the Commissioners. He requested that the open space in the Tassajara area be designated as temporary or a"holding area". He suggested that geological concerns mentioned in the Draft General Plan are over-stated. At this time, the public hearing regarding the Draft General Plan was continued to a meeting on March 13, 1984. Cm. Tenery encouraged Dublin residents to submit written communication regarding the issues contained in the Draft General Plan. * * * * NEW BUSINESS None * * * * OTHER BUSINESS None * * * ~ ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~w_~.,.,~__ y -,.,,,~.-,w,_,,,,.,~_ ,ns* ~ i~ d ~ anning Commission hairma Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director * * * *