HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso 10-24 Jordan Ranch PD Rez Stage 2 Devel Plan RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 24
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE WITH A
STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR JORDAN RANCH
PA 09-011
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Mission Valley Properties, on behalf of BJP ROF Jordan
Ranch LLC, submitted applications for an area of approximately 189.4 acres known as Jordan
Ranch within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area; and
WHEREAS, the applications include: a) Stage 2 Development Plan; b) Site Development
Review; c) Vesting Tentative Map 8024; and d) Development Agreement. The project proposes
a total of 252 Low Density Residential units, 205 Medium Density Residential units, 309 units
Medium High Density Residential units, 10,000 to 12,000 square feet of commercial use and 14
attached residential lofts as Mixed Use, Neighborhood Park, portion of a Community Park,
Neighborhood Square, Elementary School site, Semi-Public use site, open space, and other
related improvements. The applications collectively define this "Project;" and
WHEREAS, the Project site is mostly located north of the Central Parkway extension,
east of Fallon Road, generally west of Croak Road, and immediately south of the Cantara
neighborhood under construction within the previously approved residential community known
as Positano, also within the Fallon Village Project Area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution 10-XX (incorporated herein by reference) on May 11, 2010
recommending that the City Council consider a CEQA Addendum and approve its findings that
the impacts of the proposed Project have been adequately addressed in previously certified
EIRs and that no further environmental review is required for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the previously certified EIRs identified significant unavoidable impacts from
development of the Eastern Dublin area, some of which would apply to the Project; therefore,
approval of the Project must be supported by a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
WHEREAS, the Stage 1 Planned Development Rezone for the Fallon Village Project
area, including Jordan Ranch, provided for various land uses including the development of
3,108 units on 1,132 acres. This total included up to 1,064 units as part of Jordan Ranch; and
WHEREAS, the resulting density by land use for Jordan Ranch is consistent with the
respective land use category of the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan,
as follows:
Page 1 of 2
Units Descri tion/Unit Acres Densit
252 du Low Densi Residential 52.7 ac 4.8 du/ac
111 du
94 du Medium Density Residential 29.2 ac 6.9 du/ac
126 du Medium High Density
15.8 ac 14.1 du/ac
92 du Residential
105 du Mixed Use 6.6 ac 15.9 du/ac
780 du 104.3 ac du/ac
; and
WHEREAS, a Planning Commission Staff Report, dated May 11, 2010 and incorporated
herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project and the CEQA Addendum and
recommended approval of the applications; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing held on May
11, 2010 at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and use their independent judgment and
considered the CEQA Addendum, prior related environmental documents, and all said reports,
recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission, based on
the findings in the attached draft Ordinance, recommends that the City Council approve the
Ordinance attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, which Ordinance adopts
a Stage 2 Development Plan which, among other things, establishes the maximum number of
development units within Jordan Ranch and provides development regulations for the Jordan
Ranch community.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of May, 2010 by the following
vote:
AYES: King, Brown, Wehrenberg, Schaub
NOES:
ABSENT: Swalwell
ABSTAIN: ~
C
Plan ing ommissio Chair
ATTEST:
Plannin ger
G:IPA#120091PA 09-011 Jordan RanchlPC Meeting 5.11.101FINAL PC Reso-Stage2.doc
2 Of 2 .
ORDINANCE NO. XX - 10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE WITH A
STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE JORDAN RANCH PROJECT
PA 09-011
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. RECITALS
A. The Jordan Ranch project site is located in the Fallon Village Project area. Through
Ordinance 32-05, the City Council adopted a Stage 1 PD-Planned Development Rezone
Amendment for the Fallon Village Project Area which, among other approvals, established the
maximum number of residential units at 3,108 units for the Fallon Village Project Area.
B. The Stage 2 Development Plan establishes the number of residential units for Jordan
Ranch as 457 detached units, 309 attached units, and Mixed Use (consisting of 10,000 to
12,000 square feet of commercial use and 14 attached residential lofts) within six
neighborhoods.
C. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan recognizes that roadway alignments and land use
boundaries are approximate and that flexibility is needed when interpreting the plan. It further
notes that minor adjustments to roadway alignments and land use boundaries may be
necessary and that the land use map must be used in conjunction with goals and policies.
Through Ordinance 45-08, the City Council adopted an amendment to the Stage 1 Development
Plan for Fallon Village (Ordinance 32-05) which set forth minimum yard requirements for 50% of
the product proposed within land designated for Medium Density Land Uses. As such, minor
adjustments to the land use boundaries were made to meet the minimum density requirement of
the Medium Density Land Use range (14.1 du./ac).
Section 2. FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Section 8.32.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as
follows:
1. Jordan Ranch Planned Development Zoning, including a Stage 2 Development Plan,
meets the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.32 in that it complies with the land uses
and maintains the residential character and densities adopted with the Stage 1 PD-
Planned Development Rezone Amendment for the Fallon Village Project Area.
2. The Stage 2 Development Plan for Jordan Ranch will be harmonious and compatible
with existing and potential development in the surrounding area in that the Project
continues to reflect and implement the type and scale of development envisioned in
the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The Project is generally similar to
the character and density of the Stage 1 PD-Planned Development Rezone
Amendment for the Fallon Village Project Area. It provides attractive and interesting
Page 1 of 50 EXHIBIT A TO
ATTACHMENT 1
development among the six residential neighborhoods, establishes a village center,
and preserves open space, hillsides, and natural habitat.
B. Pursuant to Section 8.120.050.A and B of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council
finds as follows:
The Stage 2 Development Plan for Jordan Ranch will be harmonious and compatible
with existing and potential development in the surrounding area in that the Project
continues to reflect and implement the type and scale of development envisioned in
the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The Project is generally similar to
the character and density of the Stage 1 PD-Planned Development Rezone
Amendment for the Fallon Village Project Area. It provides attractive and interesting
development among the six residential neighborhoods, establishes a village center,
and preserves open space, hillsides, and natural habitat.
2. The Project Site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the zoning district
being proposed in that the Project maintains the general character and density of the
Stage 1 PD-Planned Development Rezone Amendment for the Fallon Village Project
Area and will implement all adopted CEQA mitigation measures identified in the
Eastern Dublin EIR, the EDPO SEIR, the 2005 SEIR related to potential
environmental impacts associated with development of the site. The Project site is
highly accessible and provides for six residential neighborhoods, a village center, and
preserves open space, and pedestrian circulation.
3. The Stage 2 Development Plan will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the vicinity or be detrimental to the public health, safety
and welfare because the Project will comply with all applicable development
regulations and standards and will implement all applicable mitigation measures
identified in the Eastern Dublin EIR, the EDPO SEIR, the 2005 SEIR. The CEQA
Addendum for the Project identified no potential for significant environmental impacts
beyond those in the previous analyses.
4. The Stage 2 Development Plan is consistent with the Dublin General Plan and
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan in that the development plan remains consistent with the
land uses of Single-Family Residential, Medium Density Residential, Medium High
Density Residential, Community Park, Neighborhood Park, Neighborhood Square,
Semi-Public, Elementary School, and Open Space,.
C. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), on 2010 the
City Council considered the CEQA Addendum and adopted Resolution No. XX-10 finding
that the Project impacts had been adequately addressed in the previously certified
Eastern Dublin EIR, the EDPO SEIR, and the 2005 SEIR, and that no further
environmental review was required, and adopting a related Statement of Overriding
Considerations for the Jordan Ranch project, which resolution is incorporated herein by
reference.
Page 2 of 51
Section 3. ZONING MAP.
Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code, the Dublin Zoning Map is
amended to rezone the following property ("the Property") to a PD-Planned Development
district:
189.4 gross acres within APN 985-0027-007-02.
A map of the rezoning area is shown below:
ZE
Section 4. STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL
Any amendments to the approved PD-Stage 1 Planned Development Rezone amendment and
Stage 2 Development Plan shall be in accordance with Section 8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal
Code.
The regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the subject
property are set forth as follows and are hereby approved:
Stage 2 Development Plan
The following is a Stage 2 Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning
Ordinance.
1. Statement of compatibility with the Stage 1 Development Plan. The Jordan Ranch
Stage 2 Development Plan is consistent with the Stage 1 Development Plan for the Fallon
Village Project area in that it provides for 457 detached units and 309 attached units, Mixed
Use (consisting of 10,000 to 12,000 square feet of commercial use and 14 attached
residential lofts), a 5.8 acre Neighborhood Park, an 11.1 acre portion of a Community Park, a
2.7 acre Neighborhood Square, a 10.1 acre Elementary School site, a 2.7 acre Semi-Public
use site, 52.7 acres of open space, and other related improvements approved in Ordinance
32-05.
Page 3 of 51
2. Statement of uses. Permitted, conditional, accessory and temporary uses are allowed as
set forth in the Stage 1 Planned Development Rezone amendment for Fallon Village in
Ordinance 32-05, incorporated herein by reference (PA-04-040).
3. Stage 2 Site Plan. The Stage 2 Site Plan for Jordan Ranch is set forth below:
4. Site area, proposed densities. The gross and net area of the Stage 2 site, maximum
densities and maximum numbers of residential units by type are set forth in the Table 1
below:
Table 1: Land Use
Land Use/Zone Unit T e No. of units Neighborhood Density Acreage
Detached- Single-Family
Low Density
Residential • 5,200 sf minimum lot 80 du 1
4.8 du/ac
52
7
Low Density
Residential • 4,000 sf minimum lot 172 du 1 4.8 du/ac .
Medium Density
Residential • 4-unit Clusters 111 du 2 6.9 du/ac
29
2
Medium Density
Residential . Small Lot/Alley Loaded 94 du 3
6.9 du/ac .
Subtotal 457 du
Attached - Multi-Famil & Mixed Use
Medium High Density
Residential . 3-story Townhomes 126 du 4 14.1 du/ac
15
8
Medium High Density
Residential 3-story Towns w/Flat
Live-work O tions 92 du 5 14.1 du/ac .
NeighborhoodNillage
Commercial
Mixed Use 3-story Towns w/Flat
(Live-work Options)
91 du
6
15.9 du/ac
6.6
• Loft over Retail
Commercial 14 du 6 15.9 du/ac
Subtotal 323 du
Semi Public 5 2.7
Elementary School 1 10.1
Community Park N/A - 11.1
Neighborhood Park 1 - 5.8
Neighborhood Square 6 - 2.7
Open Space N/A 52.7
Total 780 du 8.21 du/ac 189.4
Page 4 of 50
S. Development Regulations.
The following development standards apply to the various neighborhoods within Jordan Ranch. This
oommunity is planned to provide both single family and multi-family housing through a variety ofneigh-
borhood styles. It is intended to create affordability by design, by making a conscious effort to limit
the size of the homes and maximize the public and private open space within the community. These
standards shall supplement those found in the table ofstandards and plan requirements in Dublin's City
Ordinance.
?f
4l
Neiohborhood Ke
DRDAN RANCH
11.1 acre
Community Park
Low Density Residential
5200 SF Lots
0 4000 SF Lots
Medium Density Residential
---j Clusters
17-
0 Small Lot Alley
Page 5 of 50
Med-High Density Residential
3-Story Towns
Towns/Flats
Mixed Use
2-1
W
F
U
w
F-
r
U
Q
It is important to create a street scene that provides visual quality and variety:
W
W
Visual quality and variety can be accomplished by siting homes with varying setbacks, reversing plans so
that garages and entries are adjacent to each other where possible, and providing architectural massing
relief through porches, bays and other single story elements along the street. Where sides and rears of
homes can be viewed from streets or open space, articulation of these elevations is important as well.
This can be accomplished by providing architectural massing relief through varied setbacks and by pro-
viding both one and hvo story elements at these locations.
VARIEC GABLES AT
9U'LCING APPROPRIA7
:SATEP.,'ALS SCAI.FS
VARYING PORCH JSE OF ONE
LOCATIONS 8 & TWO STORY
DEPTH ELEMENTS
VARYING UPPER FLOOR
SETBACKS ?& SIDE & REAR
i
Y'
• a
VARYING FRONT
VARIED ROOF
FORMS & PITCHES
FR,'Ji%d\LN- FRONT
EV-RY AT EACFI
ARTICULATED FACADES
1 SIDES FACING THE
ARTICULATION OF FRONT
FACADES AND USE Or
ENCROACHING BUILDING
ELEMENTS TC PROVIDE
VARIED STP,EETFP.ONT-
r-y' a .
?y n
JORDAN RANCH
Page 6 of 50
Single Family Site Development Standards
5,200 s.f. Lots 4,000 s.f. Lots
Typical Lot Width 58.5' mir. and cco•:e 50' min. and above
Minimum Lot Size 5,200 s.f, 4,000 s.f.
Minimum Street =rontage width 'Tv
cuI-ce--,a _!knuckIes 35' 35'
Miaximum Lot Coverage 55% one story(45''c tvc story 55°.a one storyr45`-'; two sto-y
Maximum Building Height 35' 35'
Maximum Stories 3 3
Minimum Front Yorc Setcoc<s
Living A•ea 5 15'
Porch.? Ceck G' 1011
Garage (front facing) 8' 18'
Garage (side facing) 72' N/A
Encroachments 2 max, into rege. setback 2' max. into req'd. setcac<
Minimum Side Yard Setbacks
First =1oor 5'-2' 51-2'
Uppe- Floors 5 -2" ?iin. /51% 1u 7.5 min. 5'-2' min./. 50% 03? 7.5' min.
Corner Lot C' 10'
Porch/E)eck 7' T
Encroachments 2 max, into req c. setback 2' max. into req'd. setback
Minimum Rear Ya-d Setbacks
Living Area 10 min,`15' min, averace 12' min."' 15 min. average
One story Garace 5-2" 51-2'
Living A-ea above Garage 7.5' 7.5'
Encroachments 2 max. into req c. setback 2' max. into req'd. setaac<
500 s.f. min. flat area 500 s.f
min. flat area
Usable P-ivate Rea- vorc Space min. dimension: 1C' .
mm. cimersion: 10'
Required Parking 2 spaces cove-ec 2 spaces covered
Guest Parking 1 space 1 space
Notes
1 Setbacks o-e measured from the p-operty line
2 In neicnborhoods of 5,200 s.f. lots and greate-, 50% of homes backing up to open space
or public st-eets shall have one story elements on visible elevations
3 In neic-iborhoods of 5,200 s.f, lots and greater, 50% of homes backing up to open space
or public st-eets shall have a minimum 10 onset at the rear elevation
d In neiehborhoods of lots less than 5,200 s.f., 50% of homes backinc up to open space
or public streets shall have a •nimmum 2.5' offset at the rear elevation
5 T?iird stories must be tucked below the roof line into attic space
b One story homes can nave 'restec" second floor living space witin the roof o- attic space
7 Encroachments -nay incluce wTndov: coy*, chimneys, furrec columns or walls, A.'C units
and othe- a-chitectural projections. A. mmimu•n o= 3' clear passage must be nnointained
for e-nergency responders.
8 Guest oa-king shall be p-oviced on street
2-3
Page 7 of 50
- 'Ir QQR. 51-71 PAIN_
- h•:aIIOF `:
LMMI)
n
FIiST r-ooR 5'-2-vm I , 7-;
SECOND F.OOR 5! P'MN-I 7'JJ' Vl\-'O4 i6'{ Gf
FF:ATION
TYPICAL INTERIOR LOT
S
AL b>
Ij(= j FIRS FLDDR: 5??SVQN-
SKO IN FLOOR- S4'Y.I"1. -1= -_ -
lLif hQN, FOR Y..':. QF _ •_??
EUVAIJON
3: TYPICAL INTERIOR LOT
2-4
I I:51 I OOR
SCi.OND r,Gi
?'JJ'.YI\-' OR
c-c.•nTlur.
S-C:JVG rLU-)f •5--?
P.f•MIN-rC C.:". i.
[L[';&TION
SECOND `_OC
7U.' VP4. FOR
I =;an flC;\
TYPICAL CORNER LOT
TYc'ICAL CORNER LOT
JORDAN RANCI
Page 8 of 50
Medium Density Single Family Site Development Standards
Clusters Small Lot Alley
Typical Lot Wicth 60' min. and above 35 min. and above
Minimum Lot Size 3,600 s.f. 2,900 s.f.
Minimum Street =rontage width
50
25'
cukde-sac/knuckles
Maximum Lot Coverage 55'e 55%
Maximum Building Height 35 35'
Maximum Stones 3 3
Minimum Front Yarc Setaac<s
Living Area 15' 15'
Pcrcn / Deck 10' 10'
Encroachments 2 max. into req'd. setback 2' max. into req'c, setback
Minimum Side Yard Setbacks
Yard Sice 5 -2" 5'-2'
Alley Sice 15' fi-st floor/1 3 seconc floor
N,."A
f•o•n center of autocourt
Corner Lot 10' 2'
Porcn%Deck 51-2' (T C corner lot; 5'-2' (7' ,Q corner lot',
Garage Talley focinel 16' from center of autocourt N/A
Encroachments 2 max. into req'd. setback 2' max, into req'c. setback
Minimum Rear Yard Setbacks
Living Area 5 -2" 15' first floor/13' second floor
from center of alley
Garage (alley facing! N/A ' S' from center of alley
Encroachmerts 2 max. into req'd. setback 2' max, into reclb. setback
400 s.f. mir, flat area 4C0 s.f. min. flat area
Usable P•ivate Yore Space min. dimension; 18' min. cimensionc 16'
See note 6 See note 6
Required Parking 2 spaces covered 2 spaces cove•ec
Guest Parking 1 space 1 space
Notes
1 Setbacks are measured from the property line
2 Tnird stories must be tucked below tie roof line into attic space
3 Encroachments may incluce winco--v bays, chimneys, fir-ec cclumns or walls, A/C units
and other architectural p-oiecticrs. A mirimum c: ?' c ear rassage must be mairtairec
for erne-gency responde-s.
4 Guest parking shall ae provided or st-eet
5 Minimum lot size dimensions taker to center 'ine of alley
6 Per City of Dublin Medium Density single family ordinance, o minimum of 50?" of
homes must have Meir own arivate /-CC sq. ft. minimum yare space. -he -emaininc
homes must have common oaer wage crovidee,
W
w
MEMO
I
U
Page 9 of 50
W
F-
U
ua
H
r
T
U
.900
Clusters
I;_EhTERLIWC
p' AL-E4
I _
II
TYPICAL INTER OR LOT
Small Lot Allev
Page 10 of 50
JORDAN RANCH
TYPICAL CORNER LOT
Because these neighborhoods are denser in nature, buildings shall be sited to maximize open space.
Individual buildings themselves shall provide the articulation in the form of multiple setbacks. miktures
of one, two and three story elements; and a variety of porches, decks and other features that provide
massing relief. Where sides of buildings face streets or open space, articulation of these elevations is
important as well.
BUILDING
FRONT
VARYING UPPER FLOOR
SETBACKS SIDE 6? REAR
VARIED ROOF
=OILb55
1 -ll L.G_ L r aJ.1i iL
DETAILS APPROPRIATE
TO HUMAN SCALE-
ARTICULATED FACADES
?:?% SIDES FACING THE
STREET
VARYING FRONT
Mufti-Family Massing Diagram
JORDAN RANCH
ARTICULATION OF FRONT
rACADES AND USE OF
ENCROACHING BUILDING
ELEMENTS TO PROVIDE
VARIED STREETFRONT -
,- U
2-7
W
F
U
w
F-
2
U
Q
Page 11 of 50
Medium High Density Multi-Family Site Development Standards
W
U
W
Mr?1
1?1
d
Town Home/Condos Mixed Use Lofts
Maximum Building Height dC' 45'
Maximum Stories 3 3
Minimum FrontYarc Setbac<s
Living A-ea
Porch./Deck
Encroachments
Minimum Side Yard Setbacks
Living A-ea
Corner Lot
Porch/ Deck
Encroachments
Minimum Rear Yard Setbacks
Garage I;olley facing',
Living A-ea
Deck above Garage
Encroachments
Required Parking
jest =nrklrq
Notes
13'
10'
2 max. into regc, setback
70,
13'
5' f9' .Z corner lots.)
2 max. into req c. setback
15' frorn center of alley
15' first floor./ 13 second floor
from center of alley
3' fro-n certer c= c!ley
2 max. into regc. setback
2 space-
12'
6'
2' max. into req'd. setback
10'
15'
5' 110' '.:D corner lots.)
2' max. into req'd. setback
15'f rom center of alley
15 first floo-/13' second floor
f-om cente- of alley
13' f-om center of alley
2' max. into rea'd. set-ac<
2 =paces covered
1 Setbacks are measured from the property line or assumed property line between
two buildings
2 Encroachments may incluee window bays, chimneys, furred columns or walls, A/C units
and other a-chitectural projections. A minimum of 3' clear passage must be maintained
for emergency responders.
3 Guest barking is allowec off street or on street
d Limited units with tandem parking in private go•ages is allowed, provided additional
guest parking is provided.
5 A/C units must be screened from street view
30RDAN RANCH
Page 12 of 50
Town Homes/Condos
w
NMI
Mixed Use Lofts
JORDAN RANCH
Page 13 of 50
6. Architectural Standards.
The purpose of this section is to provide guidance on the architectural design and massing of the vari-
ous homes and buildings within Jordan Ranch. Care and consideration shall be given when plotting
specific home plans on specific lots to insure a variety of massing, color and material variation within
the project.
MASSING
Each home or building shall be articulated so that the massing of the streetscape of a neighborhood has
variety and visual interest. This is applicable to all front elevations, as well as street facing side eleva-
tions of corner lots. In addition, easily visible rear elevations such as those that back onto open space or
public streets shall be articulated. Solutions to achieve these goals include:
Providing floor plans with a mixture of one and two story elements (when appropriate to the
style)
Providing floor plans with offset wall planes
Providing a variety of roof forms
Providing variety of porches, decks or other architectural elements
W
U
`W
l
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN MIX
Homes and multi-family buildings shall be plotted in a manner that provides a variety of floor/building
plans and elevation styles along any given streetscape. Plotting two floor plans of the same type on adja-
cent lots shall be avoided. At no time shall the same single family floor plan with the same elevation style
be plotted adjacent to each other. Where multi-family buildings of the same type must plotted next to
or across from each other, different color schemes shall be used.
Each neighborhood shall have a minimum of the following floor or unit plans and elevation styles:
Mixed Use Lofts.
2 unit plans
I building plan
I elevation style
3 Story Towns!Flats
6 unit plans
3 building plans
2 elevation styles each
3 Story Towns
3 unit plans
3 building plans
2 elevation styles each
7_In
Small Lot Allev.
4 floor plans
3 elevation styles each
Clusters
4 floor plans
2 elevation styles each
4000 SF Lots
floor plans
3 elevation styles each
5200 SF Lots
3 floor plans
3 elevation styles each
ORDAN RANCH
Page 14 of 50
The building materials on the front elevation should wrap to a logical termination point or perpendicular
change of plane on the side elevation. Building materials on homes or buildings plotted on corner lots
shall wrap to a logical termination point or perpendicular change on the rear elevation. End lots on lanes
or courts and lots adjacent to walking paths shall be considered corner lots.
Homes shall be plotted in a manner that maximizes the rear usable portion of the lot for the homeown-
er's private open space.
SIDE YARDS
Homes shall be plotted to maximize the visual separation between homes within the project.
Care shall be given to minimize the aligning of windows between neighboring homes on side
elevations. Where possible, the visual sight lines between the homes shall be broken.
Trash receptacles are permitted to be located within the side yard setbacks (behind the perpen-
dicular fence) provided that they are screened from view by appropriate side yard fencing and
have access to the street through an appropriate gate.
Encroachments of up to two (2) feet are permitted into required yards for architectural projections
that provide relief to the main building massing form. Items such as, but not limited to chimneys, bay
windows, furred walls or columns, retaining walls less then C in height, media centers, A/C units, etc.
may encroach 2' into the required setback ofa side yard, provided a 36" minimum flat and level area is
maintained for access around the house.
..el
Single family homes shall be limited to thirty-five (35) feet in height. Third story rooms are allowed, but
must be tucked below the roof line in attic space. Roof dormers, lifts or gable end windows are allowed
to provide natural light and ventilation into these rooms.
Multi-family buildings shall be limited to three stories and forty (40) feet in height. Mixed Use buildings
shall be limited to three stories and forty-five (45) feet in height. -?
-?I
Porches may be used as single story elements at street elevations if they are incorporated into the archi-
tecture and rooflines of the home.
A minimum of 40% of the single family homes must have porches.
Porches and decks shall be designed to reflect the appropriate scale and detail for the architec-
tural style they are associated with.
Porches shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in depth so that they are useable to the home-
owners.
2-II
Page 15 of 50
Garages and driveways should be set back from the main fagade of the homes on the 4000 SF lots and
5200 SF lots. Garages should be setback from the side fagade of the Clusters to create an inviting path-
way to homes on the back side of the duster.
Varying garage locations and configurations from neighborhood to neighborhood is important. Some
strategies to accomplish the desired results are:
Designs shall strive to reduce the overall visual mass of the garage on the front elevation.
Garages should be de-emphasized by highlighting other elements of the home through architec-
tural form.
The garage must be set back behind the main living space of the home.
Front facing, three-car garages shall not be allowed. although an interior third car tandem space
is permitted
Driveways shall be varied in width as appropriate to the various plan types.
only sectional type garage doors are permitt ed.
Driveways shall alternate along the street as much as possible.
Alleys are encouraged to hide garage doors from the street.
W
V
w
F
z
U
94
2-12 P, 'A N H
Page 16 of 50
ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT
All four sides of each home or building should be given similar architectural treatment. Where materials
from one elevation terminate on an adjacent elevation, care and consideration shall be given to identify
an appropriate terminus for the material.
Recesses and shadow lines shall be created by the architecture of the home or building. Recessed win-
dows are encouraged when appropriate to the style.
ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS
Appropriately scaled architectural projections such as window bays are encouraged in order to provide
additional massing forms
Where possible, the upper stories of a home or building shall be located behind lower story elements
created by living space, garage space or porch elements
Each home or living unit shall have an appropriately scaled entry element. These elements may include
Decorative surrounds
Porches
Porticos
Garden Walls and Gates n1
Trellises
Side elevations of homes or buildings should have architectural relief and detailing similar- to the front
and rear elevation. This relief and detailing shall be appropriate in scale to the overall architectural style
of the home or building. It may be necessary to enhance visible side and rear elevations ?,,,,here the view
is prominent. -
Window grids, door styles and their associated trim design shall vary per elevation. Consistency of this
detailing around all elevations shall be maintained
On all elevations, openings shall be articulated with the appropriate head and sill details as a
minimum. Jamb details should be added when appropriate to the style.
Shutters, if incorporated, shall be sized appropriately to the window or door they serve.
Window grids. vAen appropriate to the architectural style, shall be used on all elevations.
Windows may be provided in various shapes and sizes, provided they are appropriate to the _
architectural style of the home or building.
J C 2-13
Page 17 of 50
Dormer windows shall be architecturally correct in scale, proportion and detail with the se-
lected architectural style.
Bay windows shall be carried down to grade or express appropriate visual support of a cantile-
vered condition The wall area of bay windows shall be detailed in a manner that is appropriate
to the architectural style.
ROOFS
A variety of roofforms and pitches shall be provided and will assist in meeting the massing and site criteria
for Jordan Ranch. Roof pitches shall be appropriate to the architectural style of the home or building.
Mechanical equipment, other than solar equipment, is not permitted on the roof.
Solar equipment shall be installed at the same slope as the pitch of the roof plane on which it is
located.
Satellite dishes shall be located so that they are limited from street view as much as possible.
Central hook-ups shall be provided for all single family homes and multi-family buildings. In addi-
tion, a central "home run" location shall be provided for multi-family units Satellite dishes shall
not be permitted on decks, balconies or railings.
Roof penetrations for vents shall be on the rear side of roof ridges whenever possible. All vents
shall be painted to match the color of the roof.
Overhangs shall be appropriate to the elevational style of the home or building.
The exterior elevations shall receive a consistent use of materials and colors on all sides. Accent ma-
terials such as brick and stone used on street facing elevations should be returned to a logical point of
termination at perpendicular change of plane on the adjacent elevations. Natural or natural appearing
materials shall be used as details to compliment the architectural style, and are subject to architectural
??;, design review.
W..#
Elevation materials may include'.
Stucco, board and batt siding, lap siding, or shingle siding (siding may be real wood or a cementi-
T 3 tious material)
Stone or brick, when appropriate to the architectural style.
Wood and high density foam trim elements.
Roofing material shall consist of
ONE" Composition shingle (high quality, 40 year minimum shingle with shadow relief).
Standing seam metal roofing on accent roofs or bay windows.
Concrete tile roofing is not appropriate to the style and is not allowed.
Accessory and garden structures are subject to the City of Dublin Building Code in effect at the time
of construction.
2-14
Page 18 of 50
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE GUIDELINES
The community of Jordan Ranch is designed to reflect a time when simple farmhouses, cottages and
barns were the predominant built structures among the rolling hillsides. The design intent is to create a
community that touches upon the history of the site. To accomplish this, a rural palette of architectural
styles is used to develop the theme. Farmhouse, Cottage, Shingle, Folk Victorian, Colonial, Italianate,
Folk Victorian and Rural Contemporary.
The following architectural guidelines work in conjunction with the generous amount of open space
to create a community that touches upon the history of the site. The common architectural theme
enforces a sense of place. Strong landscape design completes the connection between the built com-
munity and the natural site.
The following features shall provide guidance for architectural style throughout the neighborhoods of
Jordan Ranch:
Architecture shall be simple in massing and form and provide visual interest.
Architectural elements and materials shall be mixed and matched among elevation styles to
provide variety
Color palettes shall be bold and appropriate to the style
While neighborhoods may be traditional or contemporary interpretations as detailed in the examples
below, all styles shall reflect the simple farm house and cottage theme of the community as a whole.
The simplicity of the structures is the key element used to evoke this theme. Homes have a basic mass-
ing and form, which is the framework of the design theme. This is an important feature because the -
architectural style does not have much ornamentation to it. Pitch breaks, dormers, lifts and dropped
plates dress up the simplicity of the massing and are features that are common to the style.
Modest and straightforward materials associated with local rural buildings are also important features m?
of the design theme. These materials are used in different combinations to create variations of the ar-
chitectural style. -11"
Examples of single family homes and multi-family neighborhoods that address these guidelines are J
shown in the following vignettes. A
M??1
V
C4
ORDAN RAN 2-15 4<
Page 19 of 50
• Varied Roof Forms and Plate Height
• Board -ind Batt Sidin^
• Brick `JenerrAce ent
Uj
V
W
*Omni
U
04
Q
• Wood Bay
• Metal Roof Accent
• Stucco Finish
• Bold Colors
• Wood Bay with Metal Roof
• Mixture of Roof Pitches
• Board and Batt Siding
• Stone Veneer Accent
• Wood Bays and Lifts
• Metal Roof Accents
Page 20 of 50
• Simple Forms
• Varied Plate Heights
• Lap Siding
• Brick Chimney
• Shutters
• One and Two Story Massing
• Varied Plate Heights
• Shingle Siding
• Brick Chimney
• Wood Bav and Potshelf
w
• VarLed Roof Forms
r
,
'
Deck
• Lap Siding
• Brick Chimney
• wood Railing and Potshelf "O~
I
Rl>AN RANCH
Page 21 of 50
W
H
U
w
F
2
U
d
• Simple Massing
• Mixture of Materials
• Brick Accents
• Wood or Steel Balconies an
• Metal Roof Accents
• Simple Massing
• Var,,-d Plate Heights
• Mixture of Materials
JORDAN RANCH
• Metal Roof Accents
• Steel or Wood Bala
Page 22 of 50
• Simple forms break up building mass • Sliding shutters
• Variety of siding materials • Metal awnings
• Prominent balconies
7. Preliminary Landscaping Plan.
LEGEND
_"._- ACER RUBRUM ARMSTRONG - Scarlet Maple
CARPINUS BETULUS'FASTIGIATA - Hombeam
C£LTIS OCCIDENTALIS - Hackberry
CHITALPA TASHKENTENSIS - Chitalpa
FRAXINUS ANGUSTIFOLIA -RAYWOOD' - Raywood Ash
LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS - Brush Box
? PYRUS CALLERYANA- Flowering Pear
? ROBINIA AMBIGUA TURPLE ROBE' Purple Locust
? TILIA CORDATA Little Leaf Linden
? ULMUS PARViFOUA 'DVKr - C,mn a Elm
JORDAN RANCH
w
COW
4<
rU?
r i
Q
z
4<
0iiiiij
Page 23 of 50
STREET TREE DIAGRAM
W
PLO
4<
U
`A
o"
STREET THEE S
ACER RUBRUM ARMSTRONG'
Srmiet Maple
n
r,
CARPINUS BETULUS'FASTIGIATA'
l +omtxC,ri
Page 24 of 50
CHITALPA TASHKENTENSIS
Chitofpa
FRAXINUS ANGUSTIFOLIA'RAYWOOO'
Prffwd Ash
CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS
Hockbcny
LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS
Brush Box
STREETTREES
JORDAN RANCH
Page 25 of 50
i
C
r?
mi
ROBINIA AMBIGUA'PURPLE ROBE'
liaplf. (a uvr
TILIA CORDATA
Lttlr t_ .f Iwiden
PYRUS CALLERYANA
Flo rmg lea:
ULMUS PARVIFOLIA'DRAKE'
Chmese Elm
^W
U
A
Z
niA .,
FLOWERING PEAR
Pp m mk?•ys..,
NACKBERRY NACKBERRY
Celtm o .d"31A CPOI r.-ndrvnAla
ruRe? oe
Page 26 of 50
STREET SECTIONS
e F 1C• it 7r, e' I?'
--,? r,[ r L.,ds ? - T„u Ms
..r
Positano Parkway Fallon Road
6' 8 9' :0' , 16 , , A' . 8 ti 1
T-ar .0di" T,
PA
Central Parkway - West of Street I
n
FAriot ab_.. •. ^!?d?+Pik. LrPmkin¢ tA? PSE
Central Parkway - East of Street I
STREET SECTIONS
r S!,,, T'ro nlar,a i
V,- °_ `tr- . Tree omgg i
LU
COO
4<
ru
v S
A
z
Q
immi
Page 27 of 50
5" / 5' 5' / 5' / Y /
5msnak Sde.vall
Sr.
/ RDW !
Residential Street 56' RW
I R. / Y / IB / IP / 5 / 5 / 7 /
PSE 5llew.?lF Sid-wal*.
S I' /
/ R Q'N
Residential Street with Monolithic Sidewalk
SEL._ ._
STREET jL-T IONS
--HORNBEAM HORNBEAM
Glpquc m9uhM1 BwJim.irn Gvpnua nrluhµ'=SLEia12
SCARLET MAPLE SCARLET MAPLE
ACG• rL'JNT A,meorrg' Ac ,,,, A•T w%
t
5 is Io' S.
,
IT
Secondary Neighborhood Street
W
PLO
4<
7
A
z
4<
Omni
COAST UVL OAK
r C?.Iwnrt A?allrcA
a p'
e '
\V r
u,
12' ,Vim! le' r Is
Tnll
MY 4
PnIK Aff~ F,es, r, r k.D V:
Residential Street Cq? Open Space
.-Varies ;5n Srmnr Rpe Daaranr'.
5' , 5 ,3/
SIDCN'll.
Page 28 of 50
6- , A' / A' / lfl' , 'n , A r n 6 /
T-4
Residuntal Collector Street
FENCING
This wall is used along Positano Parkway,
8
Fallon Road, and at the residential entry 'S
roads to the single-family Neighborhood 1. T
The purpose is to define the edge of the
primary streetscape and visually con-
nect Jordan Ranch Neighborhood I to
the Positano development. The wall is a
Sierra Precast stucco. 6' in height with
columns located every 25' or at grade
changes. The wall and column color is
Copper A-42049, the wall and column
cap color is Breccia A-42048 to match
the existing wall in the existing Positano
development
T Cap Color.
Breda fA420481
wall and Column Color
Copper (A.42049)
i Ir _ 6' min.
2
The good neighbor fence is located be-
tween lots in Neighborhoods 1, 2 &-3. The
design is a vertical board wood fence, 6'
tall with cap and fascia board. Wood 4x4
posts are located at a minimum of 8' on
center.
This fence is used at locations where the
fence is visible from the public right-of-
way such as parallel to the front of the
home and along corner lots. This fence is
similar to the good neighbor fence with
an 18" top panel of vertical lattice inte-
grated into the overal 16' height.
J 0 F ^.?% til H 3-7
6'
1?I
a
U
V i
z
Q
Wj
Page 29 of 50
SECTION
This fence is used to connect side yard
wood fencing to the house on lots that in-
terface with non-irrigated open space in
neighborhoods I & 2. The design is pow-
der coated ornamental iron with 5!8"
square pickets and 3" square posts. The
overall height is 6'. Screening material in
a complementary color and material may
be added to conceal side yards with City
approval. (See open space interface fenc-
ing exhibit page 3-10)
Thisfence is used where rear of side yards
abut open space. The design is a welded
wire fence on 4x4 wood posts with wood
rails. The overall height is 6'.
This fence is used in addition to the 6'
lattice fence on corner lots to provide
greater lot coverage while maintaining an
open side view of the house. (See corner
LL, lot fencing exhibit page 3-9)
rJ
This fence is used for cluster- housing that
T fronts on the public trail or common open
space. The design can be ornamental iron
to complement the adjacent architecture
or another fire resistant material with
3
5'
.
.
City approval. The overall height is
* In some cases a solid hedge no greater
than 3'5 feet in height may be used to
separate private front yards from public
spaces.
pmni' 3-8
)AN
4.5'
.5'
Page 30 of 50
7M
On corner lots, the 6' fence shall overlap a maeimLlm of 25% of the side house length. A 4.5' lattice
fence may be added where the layout creates a large side yard to create more private space for the
homeo-,vner. Special care shall be taken on corner houses to insure that the character of front facing
architecture wraps around side elements.
FNCF
6' LATTICE TOP FENCE TO COVER 114 OF
SIDE HOUSE LENGTH
OPTIONAL 4.5' LATTICF TOP FFNCF
TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COVERAGE:
D'STANCE VARIES ACCORDING TO
SPECIFIC HOUSE PLAN MAXIMUM ?s=b
COVLRAGL O; 1IOUSL
x
6' GOOD NEIGHBOR FFNCF
r 6' LAT'T;CE TOP FENCE
•
•
•
x LU
v •
•
coo
•
A ?
E I.5' LATTICE
-OP FFNCF
/ U
m •
•
L (/
ss A
¦ ¦ imw
?
IRDA.N RANCH 3-9
Page 31 of 50
On lots that Interface with open space, ornamental iron fencing is used in locations vAere the fencing
attaches to the building. A matching ornamental iron gate a mmimum Of 30" in width shall be added as
necessary to provide side yard access.
6' ORNAMENTAL
IRON FENCE
6" WOOD GOOD
NEIGHBOR FENCE
6' OPEN SPACE
=F NCF
3.5' ORNAMFNTAL
IRON FENCE
6' WOOD GOOD
NEIGHBOR FENCE
6' WOOD LATTICE
TOP FENCE fTM
CLUSTER HOUSING - LOTS I-7.44=4.5
CLUSTER HOUSING - LOTS 47-111
6 WOOD FFNCF OR VIFW FENCE
VARIES BY LOT!
W
rw?
'r
A
z
4<
omi
C ORNAMENTAL
IRON ?FNCE
TYPICAL S NGLF FAMILY LOT
Page 32 of 50
OPEN SPACE INTERFACE DIAGRAM
it
zi
w
a
Q
U
Q
z
4<
iCIRDAN RANCf- 3-II Umi
Page 33 of 50
• Lots Which Require Open Space Interface Fencing
ENTRIES
W
T?
r
A
z
d<
OMJ
A hierarchical system of thematic landscape monumentation has been developed for the Jordan Ranch
property to introduce the community image and enhance the proposed architecture. The monuments
reflect the ranch character of the site while complimenting the existing entry elements at the adjacent
Positano neighborhoods creating a seamless blend between the two developments.
Positano Parkway &
4
a
Community Entry Locations
Page 34 of 50
Key neighborhood entries have been identified on the diagram below. Each of these entries includes one
or more of the monuments with thematic landscaping to highlight each area.
MENTATION
r 5-v r
PRIMARY ENTRY GATEWAY
RANCH
Page 35 of 50
TERTIARY MONOLITH
a•
6 x 6 Pests wtcMmfet at top, 8' ac mox.
1x6 POiis
dui
?
En
A
z
Q
wi
5.
LARGE MONOLITH
, 9'-0' ,
SECONDARY MONOLITH
SECONDARY ENTRY PORTAL
/
I?
^W
41
A
z
a
mi
Accent tre
Plarter wa
Smndwalt
Jor
Page 36 of 50
Positom Parkwoy
Positano Parkway and Street C
ENTRY AT FALLON ROAD AND STREET TT
Fallon Road and Street TT
qoqoolol1"' TlF rr+ y - r't
Now
3-15
Page 37 of 50
=CT{ON 3
ENTRY AT FALLON ROAD AND CENTRAL PARKWAY
Accent trees in
W
Q
A
Q
Rail fence
Hedgerow
Orchard grid
3
o-
v
C u +r
ldo?
FAC(O,V ROAD
Special paving
Fallon Road and Central Parkway
Secondary monolith
with low stone wall
to mach monoliths
Large monolith
Contrasting,
perennial rows
Page 38 of 50
i frt4 IY.+F? N i Od i1.t'i ?: t-' ?5'.Y? AA i •A ?. .i?t'i Ai i
:C7
ENTRY AT CENTRAL PARKWAY AND STREET I
accent trees and
12' T af.
r
ma?yy. ,t
Central Parkway and Street 1
Secondary mnofitn
with rad fence
W
POLO
q<
'
u
A
z
4<
Omj
Page 39 of 50
ENTRY AT CENTRAL PARKV
W
d
U
a
z
4C
Wi
large monolith
with rail fence
a
0
0
rr
J
N
}r.• 1
0 V ,, ?
Accent trees and
color perennials
Large monolith
with ran fence
Cerwof Parkway
3-I$ F:.-ANC N
Page 40 of 50
Central Parkway at School Loop Road
SEC; I IUN 3
COMMON SPACE
The design of the higher density neighborhoods within Jordan Ranch provides a series of common open
spaces that are intended to serve the adjacent residents. These common areas will provide a range of
passive and active recreational opportunities for the neighborhood residents separate from the City
parks that will be available within the Jordan Ranch development. Not only do these spaces expand the
amount of usable exterior space provided for residents. but they connect the neighborhoods to each
other creating a visually cohesive community. The design of the common areas is intended to encour-
age pedestrian activity and interaction between residents. Examples of common open space design are
shovm on the following pages.
"a
it
jl
l?
Common Neighborhood Open Space
Page 41 of 50
i
W
- i ?
_ r
3-19
The common open space associated with the cluster housing neighborhood provides residents with a
garden like open space with walking paths and small lawn areas. The design of this space is intended
to visually extend the front yards and provide an off-street path of travel. Larger shade trees and or-
namental plantings highlight the cottage feel of the architecture, lawn areas expand the space while
maintainingan intimate scale. Connections to the public sidev?alk are included to invite people into the
commons interior.
? r
See Enlargement
Open lawn areas within
common space
i commons
Mork
i1'1 _-
ial
Landscapnng in
bulb- ou[s W
F ighl ght corners
COW,
q<
U
z
4<
MMJ
Connection from public
sidewalk to commons interior
Access through priwte drive aisles
to rear unit entries
Landscaping to buffer homes
from common space
I ,Md ,r ng in hi lh-nnrt with reriocrrinn
connection to adjacent commons
Page 42 of 50
N?
A 5' public path shall be included
in the common space to connect
public sidewalks. private residences,
and add,tional open space parcels
V \ _.
Provide large canopy
shade trees throtfhout
\\ common space
',\ a Small flexible use spaces
e should be provided in common
Provde a buffer between open spaces
private residences and S
public open space with Public connections between
landscaping 7 the street and common open
spice shall he provided through
prWare dnves and are highlighted
witl• accert trees and landscape
y'i I I
JORDAN RANCH
M
V)
A
Page 43 of 50
SECT!'_
The common open space associated with the single-family alley neighborhood provides a large multi-use
area with will function as a semi-private park for adjacent residents. The design of this space includes
an open lawn for active play, a tot-lot, group picnic areas, large shade trees and ornamental gardens.
Pedestrian paths connect the public sidewalk to individual entries and provide separation between the
houses and the lavm area. Bulb-outs in the parking area are utilized as connection points for adjacent
common areas.
- t? -- Pcdestnan
connernon to,rfrom
`public sidewalk to
Landscaped bulb-out
with pedestrian
connecuonto
sidewalk
Connect paths to
front doors from
- common walk
?C
r?
w rr
7f
1
V _
V l '
-Community space
with amenities such
as seating, play areas.
BBQ's• etc.
Pedestrian connection
to adjacent common areas
; ?'??^;!!-?(? rr. •..? Landscaped entry to highlight
Kae? 71 commons entry
--I
Multi-use recreation area
Ircludr mm?w yes sieh ac
ornamental gardens & berches
in conrno'is area
wJ 3-22 A. N P _A N C!-- _
Page 44 of 50
Tot lot within common open space
with play equipment, shade structure,
seating, shade trees and landscaping to
screen area from adjacent residences
', r 1111111F :
e
1 7 115 --
5' wide public pedestrian walk
throughout common space to
link individual entries and access
to parking areas
S' minimum landscape area between
individual units and public walk
Small aexible open space shall
be provided throughout the
commons for more intimate
gatherings and casual activny
AW
I?
r /
z
q<
OMJ
Page 45 of 50
The common open space within the town neighborhood provides passive recreational space and a con-
nection betr,veen the individual units and the public sidewalks. Landscaping is provided between the
main pedestrian paths and porches to give a sense of privacy to residents. The lawn areas expand the
space and a center garden visually breaks up the building mass. Connections to adjacent open spaces
are highlighted and paths are provided between buildings to encourage pedestrian activity.
Landscape bulb-ow
to signal access to
common area, use
flowering trees, evergreen - -
shrubsand other color- _
planting to highlight connection 1 26 2b l 24 3
W
COW
q<
U
z
Q
WJ
Pedestrian connection -
to adjacent community
5
to public path
Plan or other special
feature at Central
Parkway with special
paving and flowering
`7
Town Commons
3-24 G A IN L----J III
Page 46 of 50
The common open spaces associated with the town/flat units have a visual character which reflects
the more urban nature of the neighborhood. Pedestrian paths and small plazas are used to visually dis-
tinguish each space providing individuality to each block. Paths are more linear and planting areas are
formal in character. The design of these spaces are meant to be visually distinct from the upper floors
Of the units.
i
I
1
JORDAN RANCH
Landscape to buffer individual
units from common area
Connert front doors
to public path
common space from
parking area
ro
Central courtyard with
architectural character
W
V
A
z
d
Page 47 of 50
r
Town/flats Commons - North of Central Parkway
SECTION
TOWN/FLATS COMMONS
Highlight pedestrian
connection to retail
Common area lawn
f ,
Amenities within commons
may include shade structures
and benches
t
Provide connect+on from
w. • i a adjacent parking and sidewalks
M through commons
Lannscape to buffer ,snits
from scree[
Town; Flats Commons South of Central Parkway
W
Q
U
A
Z
3-26 A N F
Page 48 of 50
Access to the public trail along the open space corridor is provided in several locations within the cluster
neighborhood. These trail access points are highlighted "with bulb-outs and include informal landscaping
and pedestrian paths.
Trail Along Open Space Corridor
Common ALcess _oTra
JORDAN RANCH
12' commurty trail along
open space corridor: 8' asphalt
path with 2' DG shoulders per
Fallon Village Stage I PD
Open space trees and
shrubs within the 30'
trail easement
Create view areas along trail
IT community trail along
open space corridor
DG pedestrian path. 5 min.
Highlight entry at
put3lic connection to trail with
nowe-ing trees. widened entry
path and monument or trellis
w
tU
rII f
A
z
4<
Wi
Page 49 of 50
8. Phasing Plan. No specific phasing is required. Any project phasing shall be established at
the time of grading permit issuance for individual neighborhoods.
9. Inclusionary Zoning Regulations. The Project's inclusionary requirements have been
satisfied through an "alternative method of compliance" under City code section 8.68.040E
as set forth in the Development Agreement, including a specific Community Benefit
Payment.
Section 5. Pursuant to the Dublin Zoning Ordinance, section 8.32.060.C, the use,
development, improvement, and maintenance of the Project area shall be governed by the
provisions of the closest comparable zoning district as determined by the Community
Development Director and of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance except as provided in the Stage
1/Stage 2 Development Plans.
Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of
its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause the Ordinance to be posted in at
least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the
Government Code of the State of California.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this
day of 2010 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
G: SPAM20091PA 09-011 Jordan RanchlPC Meeting 5.11.1 MFINAL CC ORD_Stage2.doc
Page 50 of 50