HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.04 Developer Impact Feeby
~- ~ -i~
1
'~\~
CITY CLERK
File # ^~~~-~~
~/l~%
AGENDA STATEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 16, 2008
SUBJECT: Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits:
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66002, 66006 and 66008
(AB 1600)
Report Prepared by: Paul S. Rankin, Administrative Services Dir. Q~,
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits
2. Resolution Making Findings Regarding Unexpended
Traffic Mitigation Contributions for Fiscal Year 2007-2008
RECOMMENDATION: 1) Accept the Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds For the
Year Ended June 30, 2008; and
E
2) Adopt the Resolution Making Findings Regarding Unexpended
Traffic Mitigation Contributions for Fiscal Year 2007-2008.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: All Developer Deposits are anticipated to be utilized for the purpose
for which they were originally collected.
DESCRIPTION: A City is authorized under State Law to require development applicants to
contribute fees toward off-site public improvements, which are needed as a result of the new development.
Annually the City is required to disclose the status of funds held for this purpose. The report in
Attachment 1 provides information covering the period from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008.
Requirements of Law
The law requires the City to review on an annual basis the status of development fees collected. The law
provides for a report to be made available within 180 days from the end of the Fiscal Year. In addition,
Government Code Section 66006(b)(2) requires the report is to be included on the Agenda at a public
meeting not less than 15 days after the information was made available. Staff previously made available
to the public a draft copy of this report on Monday, December 1, 2008. In the event that any fees remain
unexpended for more than five years, the City Council must adopt a Resolution making certain findings
related to the continued need for the funds to complete the improvements. In the event that findings are
not made to support the retention of the funds, the unexpended fees must be returned to the current owners
of the subject property.
--------------------------------------------------------------
COPY TO:
Page 1 of 3
ITEM NO.
G:W61600 -Impact Fees~FY 07-08~AGENDA FY0708.DOC
Maior Components of Report
The Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Annual Report of Developer Funds is shown in Attachment 1. The law
requires disclosure of numerous details with respect to activity in these accounts. This includes:
beginning and ending balances; collections for the year; expenditures for the year; interest earned; and any
refunds. For the purpose of this report the City is providing information on the following funds:
FUNDS ACCOUNTED FOR IN REPORT (ATTACHMENT 1)
• Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees
• Downtown Traffic Impact Fee
• Public Facilities Impact Fees
• Park Dedication Fees
• Fire Impact Fees
• Tri Valley Transportation Development Fees
• Category 3 Regional Traffic Impact Fees
• Pass Through Fees: (Freeway Interchange Fees /BART Garage)
• Dublin -Contra Costa Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees
Excluded from this report are developer fee types that do not fit the definition for the disclosure
requirements found in State Law. California Government Code section 66001 is applicable to funds
collected for public improvements. The Noise Mitigation funds are collected to finance future noise
mitigation on private properties and would not meet the public improvement criteria. Three fees are
collected as part of the Zoning powers of the City: 1)Non-Residential Affordable Housing Linkage Fee 2)
Housing In-Lieu funds; and 3) Public Art In-Lieu funds. Fees collected under the City's general police
power are not deemed as mitigation fees.
Details of activity for each of the fees are displayed in the Annual Report (Attachment 1). The following is
a summary of the activity for the year including the Beginning and Ending Balance.
Expenses:
FEE
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact
Beginning
~~Balance
X1112007 Additions::
Fees Collected
Interest
Revenue Project Costs;
Interest,
Loan .
Re a menfs
--
Lnding
Balance (June
30,2008
Fees (Excludes BART Garage
Com onent -Pass Throu ) $ 10,711,594 $ 13,345,881 ($ 4,264,080) $ 19,793,395
D
owntown Traffic Impact Fees &
Miti ation Pro'ects
P
bli
F
il $ 2,238,316 $ 169,533 $ 44,288) $ 2,363,561
u
c
ac
ity Fees
Fi
I $ 9,343,597 $ 2,895,214 ($ 4,538,484) $ 7,700,327
re
mpact Fees -Advance
Owed To General Fund
T
i
V
ll ($ 1,791,762 $ 28,308 ($ 73,567) ($ 1,837,021)
r
-
a
ey Transportation
Develo ment Fees ($ 69,979) $ 67,784 None ($ 2
195)
C
t
3 ,
a
egory
Regional Traffic
hn act Fees $ 1,316,019 $ 58,803 None $ 1
374
822
P
Th ,
,
ass
rough Fees: Freeway
Interchange /BART Gara e
D
bli $ 1,081,138 $ 284,245 ($1,365,383) $ p
u
n -Contra Costa Traffic
Im act Miti ation Fees $ 3,154,496 $ 1,299,697 ($4,454,193) $ p
TOTAL $ 25,983,419 $18,149,465 $14,739,995) $ 29,392,889
rage~or~
It is important to note that these fees are restricted and can only be used for the capital related purposes for
which they have been collected. Given the multi-year nature of the capital projects to be financed it is
expected that funds will be accumulated and used based on the construction timing.
Funds Remaining Unexpended More Than 5 Years After Beim Collected
One of the provisions in the legislation regulating development fees is to regularly review funds collected
and held without being expended for more than five years. The law requires the City to make certain
findings in order to continue to hold fees collected and unexpended for more than five years. The
following Table summarizes the accounts with contributions which have remained unexpended for more
than five years. All of the projects are identified in the adopted City of Dublin 2008-2013 Capital
Improvement Program.
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTS WITH FUNDS REMAINING UNEXPENDED
FOR FIVE YEARS OR MORE AFTER THEY WERE COLLECTED
Impact Fees
Pro'ect Name
D
h (Unexpended)
as of June 30, 2008 Accumulated
Interest TOTAL
DESIGNATED
oug
erty Road -North of
Amador Valley Boulevard To City Limit
St
P
i
k $294,364 $ 131,366 $ 425,730
.
atr
c
Wa -Regional to Golden Gate
D
h $395 266 $ 190,809 $ 586,075
oug
erty Road Improvements -Houston
Place North to Amador Valley Blvd
Bik
L $148,791 $ 41,413 $ 190,204
e
ane - Amador Valley Boulevard
Stagecoach Road to Dou erty Road $ 51 507 $ 19,491 $ 70,998
Dublin Boulevard Improvements -
Sierra Court to Dublin Court
S
l
D $509,046 $ 170,305 $ 679,351
car
ett
rive Extension Between Dublin
Blvd and Dou herty Road $ 28 801 $ 78,664 $ 107,465
Proposed Resolution Making Necessary Findings
In order to retain fees longer than five years certain findings must be made by the City Council. Without
this action the fees would need to be refunded. All of the projects summarized in the previous section of
this report are identified projects that will require the funding in the future. The City continues to allocate
interest on the balances retained. Staff has identified the findings necessary as part of the attached
Resolution (Attachment 2). Adoption of the Resolution allows the City to continue to retain the fees, in
order to fund the projects for which they were collected.
Staff would recommend that the City Council accept the Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds
For the Year Ended June 30, 2008 (Attachment 1) and adopt the attached Resolution Making Findings
Regarding Unexpended Traffic Mitigation Contributions for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 (Attachment 2).
Page 3 of 3
v`~/y;~or~Ut~~~~
l9 ~-; _=x,,82
City of Dublin
Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits
For the Year Ended June 30, 2008
CONTENTS
i~ ~~
SECTION INFORMATION pAGEfS)
Section 1: Table of Disclosure Requirements With Cross
Reference To Government Code and Location In
City of Dublin Report ...................................... 1-2
Section 2: Description Impact Fees Included ~In Report......... 3
Section 3: Status of Funds
• Interfund Loans & Transfers
• Specific Funds Held In Excess of 5 Years
• Refunds .............................................. 4-6
Section 4: 2007/2008 Accounting of Impact Fees
• Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees
• Public Facility Impact Fees
• Park Dedication Fees
• Fire Impact Fees
• Downtown TIF /Mitigation (All Accounts)
• Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee
• Freeway Interchange Fees
• BART Parking Garage Component TIF
• Dublin /Contra Costa Mitigation Fees....... 7-8
Section 5: Detail By Account -Downtown Traffic Mitigation
Contributions ................................................ 9
Section 6: Schedule of Funding For Public Improvements 10-11
And Percentage Funded By Developer Fees...........
Data Available To Public December 1, 2008
Presented City Council Meeting
December 16, 2008
~tew,~ ~/ ~ ~i I2~1 b
ATTACHMENT 1
~~,3
Section 1
TABLE OF IMPACT FEE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
WITH CROSS REFERENCES
Government Code Information Found In
Section Requirement Ci Report At
Provide the following:
66006 (b) (A) 1. A brief description of each of the City's impact fees. Section 2, Part A
66006 (b) (B) 2. The amount charged for the City's impact fees. Section 2, Part B
66006 (b) (C) 3. The beginning and ending balance for the City's Section 4 and Section 5
impact fee accounts.
66006 (b) (D) 4. The amount of fees collected and interest earned. Section 4 and Section 5
66006 (b) (E) 5. An identification of each public improvement on Sections 4, 5 and 6
which fees were expended and the amount of the
expenditures on each improvement, including the
total percentage of the cost of the public
improvement that was funded with fees.
66006 (b) (F) 6. An identification of an approximate date by which Section 3, Part B
the construction of the public improvement will
commence if the local agency determines that
sufficient funds have been collected to complete
financing on an incomplete public improvement, as
identified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of
Section 66001, and the public improvement remains
incomplete.
66006 (b) (G) 7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan Section 3, Part A
made from the account or fund, including the public
improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees
will be expended, and, in the case of an interfund
loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and
the rate of interest that the account or fund will
receive on the loan.
66006 (b) (H) 8. The amount of refunds made pursuant to Section 3, Part C
subdivision (e) of Section 66001 and any allocations
pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 66001.
Page 1
G:Wb1600 -Impact Fees\FY 07-08\OUTLINE.DOC
-~ ~3
Section 1
TABLE OF IMPACT FEE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
WITH CROSS REFERENCES
Government Code Information Found In
Section Requirement City Report At
66001 (d) 9. For the fifth year following the first deposit into the Section 3, Part B and
account or fund, and every five years thereafter, the attached Resolution for
City shall make all of the following findings with items a-e below.
respect to those portions of the impact fee
remaining unexpended, whether committed or
uncommitted.
66001 (d) (1) a. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be used
for.
66001 (d) (2) b. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between
the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.
66001 (d) (3) c. Identify all sources and amounts of funding
anticipated to complete financing in incomplete
improvements.
66001 (d) (4) d. Designate the approximate dates on which the
funding referred to in item c above is expected to
be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
66006 (b) (1) (F) e. When sufficient funds have been collected, the
agency shall identify, within 180 days of the
determination that sufficient funds have been
collected, an approximate date by which the
construction of the public improvements will
commence.
Page 2
G:\Ab1600 -Impact Fees\FY 07-08\OUTLINE.DOC
Section 2 ~ I~
DESCRIPTION OF IMPACT FEES
A. DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY'S IMPACT FEES
The City of Dublin has established the following Impact Fees and Traffic Mitigation Contributions:
• Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees
• Downtown Traffic Impact Fee
• Public Facilities Impact Fees
• Park Dedication Fees
• Fire Impact Fees
• Tri Valley Transportation Development Fees
• Freeway Interchange Fees
• Dublin -Contra Costa Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees.
These impact fees were established to pay for the design, development and construction of public
improvement projects for: streets; public facilities; parks; fire capital expansion projects and community
amenities.
B. AMOUNTS CHARGED BY THE CITY FOR IMPACT FEES AND PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FUNDED BY THESE FEES
The amounts charged for the impact fees noted above are dependent upon the type and size of a particular
development and were based upon related studies, conducted prior to the adoption of the fees. The City
Council has adopted and imposed the subject fees through the passage of the following resolutions. These
fees are updated on an annual basis based upon various cost indexes described in further detail as part of
the resolutions for these fees:
The studies and supporting documentation presented or adopted as part of the resolutions noted above
identify the public improvements that those fees will be used to finance. These studies also show that
there is a reasonable relationship a.) between the fees' use and the type of development project on which
the fee is imposed and b.) between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on
which the fee is imposed.
Page 3
G:\Ab1600 -Impact Fees\FY 07-08\sec_2_Descrip[ionofFees.DOC
Impact Fee Resolution /Ordinance
SECTION 3 ~- ~3
STATUS OF FUNDS
A. INTERFUND LOANS AND TRANSFERS OF IMPACT FEES
No interfund loans or transfers of impact fees were granted to other funds during Fiscal Year 2007-2008.
The Fire Impact Fee Fund received an advance /loan from the General Fund in both Fiscal Year
2003/2004 and Fiscal Year 2004/2005. Collections of Fire Impact Fees are being used to repay the
advance. Interest accrues at the rate equal to the City's return on its investment portfolio.
B. ANALYSIS OF FEES LEVIED AGAINST DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 66001 OF THE (CGC) AND UNSPENT AFTER 5 YEARS
The purpose of the review was to identify monies that have been collected and held for a period of more
than five years and to make appropriate disclosures. The City of Dublin has analyzed the balance of
monies held in its impact fee funds and has determined that there are six projects involving the use of
Traffic Mitigation Contributions, which have continued to be held for more than five years. The Projects
are accounted for in the adopted City of Dublin Five Year Capital Improvement Program 2008 - 2013. In
accordance with State Law, the City Council has previously adopted Resolution #01-08 on January 15,
2008 declaring the need to continue to maintain the funds in order to complete these six projects.
Details related to the six projects and funds held for more than five years are identified below:
1. DOUGHERTY RD - AMADOR VALLEY BLVD NORTH TO CITY LIMIT (#96855)
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation: $294,364
Project Cost As Identified In CIP (#96855): $4,377,563
Descri tion of Pro'ect This project will widen Dougherty Road to a six lane divided highway, including
landscaped medians within the project limits. In a previous phase a traffic signal was added at Willow
Creek Drive and funded from the Dougherty Valley Impact Fees.
Source of Funding The work is anticipated to be funded by Traffic Impact Fees, including contributions
from this source as well as Eastern Dublin TIF and contributions from the Dublin /Contra Costa County
(Dougherty Valley) Mitigation Fees.
Approximate Project Completion Dates
A precise completion date for the project has not been established. It is currently expected that it will be
will be a date outside the current 5 Year CIP planning horizon.
2. ST. PATRICK WAY -REGIONAL STREET TO GOLDEN GATE DRIVE (#96870)
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to S Year Limitation: _$395,266
Project Cost As Identified In CIP (#96870): 1 501 365
Description of Prot This project will construct a 2-lane roadway between Golden Gate Drive and
Regional Street, south of and parallel to Dublin Boulevard. The need for a connector road for three long
commercial cul-de-sacs was first identified in the City's original Downtown Study. This need is becoming
more apparent as this portion of the Central Business District develops further and the BART parking
structure has been constructed along Golden Gate Drive.
The section of Saint Patrick Way between Amador Plaza Road and Golden Gate Drive was constructed by
the Alameda County Transportation Authority (ACTA) as part of the I-580/I-680 Interchange
Page 4
G:\Ab1600 -Impact Fees\FY 07-08\sec}_Status of FundsFY0708.DOC
SECTION 3
STATUS OF FUNDS
~~13
Improvements. For the purpose of this Capital Project, only the portion of Saint Patrick Way that is
anticipated to be built by the City is included in the cost estimate.
Source of Funding Downtown Traffic Mitigation Contributions and Impact Fees, BART mitigation
funds, and developer mitigation improvements.
Approximate Project Completion Dates A deposit has been made to the State Condemnation Fund for
the acquisition of the right-of--way. It is estimated that the City will complete the acquisition of right-of-
way in Fiscal Year 2008-2009 and the Developer will then construct improvements.
3. DOUGHERTY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS -HOUSTON PLACE NORTH TO AMADOR
VALLEY BOULEVARD (#96850)
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation: $148,791
Project Cost As Identified In CIP # 96850: $4,474,177
Description of Project This project consists of two phases and the first phase is complete. The second
phase consists of widening the number of travel lanes from four to six lanes and installing landscaped
medians.
Source of Funding In addition to these funds, Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Funds; and Dougherty
Valley (Contra Costa County Impact Fees)
Approximate Project Completion Dates A precise completion date for the project has not been
established. It is currently expected that it will be will be a date outside the current 5 Year CIP planning
horizon.
4. BIKE LANE - AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD CORRIDOR (#96778)
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation: $51,507
Project Cost As Identified In CIP #96778: 110 204
Description of Project This project would construct a Class 2 bicycle lane along the north side of
Amador Valley Boulevard between Stagecoach Road and Dougherty Road to allow for the exclusive use
of bicycles and pedestrians. This Bike Lane Project on Amador Valley Boulevard will connect the Iron
Horse Trail, the Alamo Creek Bike Path, and the Dougherty Road Bike Path.
Source of Fundine Measure B Bike and Pedestrian, and Traffic Mitigation Contributions.
Approximate Project Completion Dates It is estimated that the project will be completed in Fiscal Year
2008-2009.
5. DUBLIN BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS -SIERRA COURT TO DUBLIN COURT (#96930)
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation: $509,046
Project Cost As Identified In CIP #96930: $2,984,005
Descri tion of Project This project will widen Dublin Boulevard from Sierra Court to Dublin Court and
underground existing overhead utilities. This project will increase the roadway capacity from four to six
Page 5
G:\Ab 1600 -Impact Fees\FY 07-08\sec_3_Status of FundsFY0708.DOC
SECTION 3 ~ ~
STATUS OF FUNDS
lanes. This is the third phase of the Dublin Boulevard widening. The widening of this segment of Dublin
Boulevard will complete the improvements on Dublin Boulevard from San Ramon Road to Dougherty
Road. Recent traffic studies have shown that six lanes of traffic will be needed as Dublin continues to
expand to the east.
Source of Funding Traffic Mitigation Contributions, Category 2 Eastern Dublin TIF Fees
Approximate Project Completion A precise completion date for the project has not been established. It
is currently expected that it will be will be a date outside the current 5 Year CIP planning horizon.
6. SCARLETT DR & IRON HORSE TRAIL EXTENSION -DUBLIN BLVD -
DOUGHERTY RD (#96840)
Amount Collected in Previous Fiscal Years Subject to 5 Year Limitation: $28,801
Project Cost As Identified In CIP #96840: 11 140 426
Description of Project This project will widen Dublin Boulevard from Sierra Court to Dublin Court and
underground existing overhead utilities. This project will increase the roadway capacity from four to six
lanes. This is the third phase of the Dublin Boulevard widening. The widening of this segment of Dublin
Boulevard will complete the improvements on Dublin Boulevard from San Ramon Road to Dougherty
Road. Recent traffic studies have shown that six lanes of traffic will be needed as Dublin continues to
expand to the east.
Source of Funding Traffic Mitigation Contributions, Category 2 Eastern Dublin TIF Fees; Alameda
County Transportation Improvement Authority Project Funds.
Approximate Project Completion Dates A precise completion date for the project has not been
established. It is currently expected that it will be will be a date outside the current 5 Year CIP planning
horizon.
C. REFUNDS
No refunds were made during Fiscal Year 2007-2008.
Page 6
G:~Ab1600 -Impact Fees~FY 07-08~Sec_3_Status of FundsFY0708.DOC
N n v
'~ ~ CO o rn
~
LL O
LL f, C ~ M r
i rn
W ~
•
~~ m
d N N n O
~~I--NN ~
a LL Z C
U c
~ Z
3 ~
N ~ ~ y v
F . a~
:a
:
3~
° o
~ F=OB
W
7 N v c°o
V W O h
a coo 0
i[i
LL N
nj
~
.-.
n F
-
O
N d LL~ V M
t!y r
O ~
~ ~ O ~ O J V~ ~~ ~ N O
N V
LL a j O M ~ n ~ V~ O ~
m r
d LL
~ ~
q N (h
C W Q
~ F LL Q ('7
~ZaC7
~ _ 6 ~ O ~ F- N
C
~ ° V ~ ~ O
M
~
O
N "O
C
LL
~
O
O
O
O
O
O
~
N O (D
W N Q M
V
~
C
Z ' EH O
~ N
LL
M
O
y
~ ~
~
O W~ O M
= M r
~ a Z~
0 N
~'
•? a W M
ac~w•c ~
a
u M
0
o3aa .M
W
Uo N
• p
.;~
W ~
V
min
0
C1
Q LL N
~ =~ ~ F
7
~ LL
v
.m
~ H a 7 v
y Z m
°
Q
O ~ c
~
a QQ
v
N ;-
~•
~
~
~
O M W M O
N
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ CO fM0 O h (Op M W O
a (n
W V O
N O
M N N (O N ~
~ (O ~ O LL ~ O
0
LL W
~
j ~
LL O
F r1
„ ~ n
v }
~
W 0
'R' W rn
~ A
mJV c i Q
~JF~ tH
~ a V a O
LL W a V 0
Z
d LL~ ~
d.M-~
a0
~ V W ~
W
W ~ o
LL
F
V
a
a m
~
J ~
d N N
~ M
1~ coo
M ~
~ a
~
O M at
(O to ~
F Z U ~ u7 M V 00 M Z N ~ ~
a
(~ m a~
~ V N ~ ~ ~
N ~
n °z o
~' F
Z
~ LL aR ~`'~ p
~ ~
~
O W ~
J F rL N
J ~~ F N f9 Ja D: a W V
a~W
~
p ~rrn a
w W •~ ~
O
wLLM
p W a s ~~ ~ ~
U c i F- O
v a
V O y O
. Z Z Z
Z U
O
~ U
O ~ C •~
CO
.~
p
LL
d 7
LL C
~'
O
N
N
U y
~~
7
~
~
~ 7
O
~ N
O
N~
O V
~
o M
~? w c N N _
~ ~~ aci N ~
_
° c ° e _
g ° o ~ ~ > U ~ ~ 0 0
~
N ^ M~ k `
V ~ ~ N Y ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ M
t
O ~ ~ ' O _
~O
w o a v c E U
R d ~ p ~ O C ~ y ~ O~ > ~ V
R v d
~ N
o ~ J V O U C
Q
~ ~
~ c ~
~ U
O
p O ~ c ~
°
E ~ ~
0 N N O ~ LL in d m
U d L C U y U 0
C
N
~
N U O
. C
O
d p
U
~ - O
C
d d ~ U L .~ L ~ N (
0 j
W lL C V U aif (n Z l C D f- N C
~ W
~~
.~,
w ~
N y~
V' py
O
M
N
V!
o
N
M
O
V
7 p p
~ O
'~ ~
~ ~
N
Y9
h
n
eq
M
M
N
f9
O
Z H
U C
N N
O
d N
O w ~
O y C "' > 7 ~
O ` N ~ O ~
M
O ~ f0
O n O 'O O N > ~ O O
M ~ O d d 3 .N.. Ul O ~
ep ~ M d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M
y n co W ~ ~ E .c U `O
m n c ~~> ~ U v
• c o c
> w r ~` H rn a c y a
a is °° ~ ~ ~ ~ d R
~ (~ y N
C N v N O1 C `~ N C _C
~ d d N N f0 N N w ~
W ti ~ v~ m H LL ~ W
Z
0
H
U
W
N
g
M
0
N~
g
4
E
m
d
a
h
g
a`
O
Page 7
}
W
H
a
r
m
fn
D
Z
LL
W
~ LL
O ~
V
w a ~
W ~ N
V
~ ~ M
V ~
C
a~ f- ~
~ Z '
o
0
N
a c
v ~ ''
Z W ~
m y
~ ~
~ - Q
~ O ~-
V ~
Y
W
m
J
H
Z
W
W
J
a
a
N
0 oo~
0 0
0
Q N
d ~ ~ M ~
~? ~ ~
~
a~a m
~
:~
LL
Z Ofn
Q
N
o° ~ ~
M
ZW
Z O
~ W t~ c°Dp
00 ~ (O
~ c
J Q
J
Q =
U
N ~ (_O
M ~
I~ (O M M
M
v W
p
O
LL ~
0
W .O
~ ~-
~ ~
0
0
~ Z
7
~ fA
Z W ~ o° v o° °
M J ~
~. m E' In
N M O ~
~ (p O ~
~
~ („~
pGa
d O
~
~
~° N
m ~
rn
W d'~ _
~ ~ ~
U ~ W 0
~
w~
I-
W O a00 ~ M
v W
ui
NJLL c} ONi M M cN7 O
~ ~ C)
~ ~ Q o
V ~ ~ ~
CO tf) co
I~ co
W ~ ~
.n
b9
~ ~
~
~W 0
V
Q W lq
W
H
W
~ ~ 'MV.
N
N
r J W
~? U
O ~ W M
N O ~ tt
~
Off
O
Oda ~ ~ v ° ~ '~'~
WG'~- ~ ~ N
V
o ~ O
i fA
t n
W
H
O
Z
U
~
_
0
d
O
O y ~
O w
'~
~
~
+_3+
~ ^ ao :a
~ ~
~ 4%
~
o0
M ~ O
d
~O ~ M Q O
C
~ ~ O
M
m ~ m to
~ 'a ~ U
a~
> U m
v
~ ao
.~ ~ o 0 o U c
Q df n ~ ~ a R
m
m V y N
y d iii U ~
m c c
W W ~ ~ ~ ~ W
Page 8
~~ ~3
r
n
o~
~i
o~
~~
0
U
s
0
a
d
d
U
a
E
ni
E
N
m
0
0
N
N ;
o°
v ~
~' a
C LL
a
do
w
O o
v
z
_~
~"'
U
W
~ O O p ..1 ~
O ~ ^
N ~ ~~ ~~
,~ ~ N N Q
~ d: .- i
O > ~ O ~
~ ~ ~
c+1
~ ~ aM0 ~
~ 00 ~
O-
Q O
~ ~ ~
N N
to
~ M
M O
~ ~ N
~ ~
M
C
~. ~ Z N ~ rC°i Z
~ N N O
~
'""
m V
o
O ~+ Q ~!
~ L 0 O ~!
~ ~ ti ~~
F- C M
to N rn
O M rn
M ~
Lf~ W
O
N O~ F- O CO
~
~
~ M
~ M
O
N ~
_ f~ ~ N
~~ ~ O ~
M CV
ti O
O
~
O
O T
N O O
O rn ~> t0 ~ ...
M C ~ O
O
r
~ Q ~
~
O
= N ~
I~ p M
~ O
O
~ ~
y ~
~' Q ~ ~
~' ? = Q ~ ~
Z V
ti
O V -a ~ p ~ O O M M
W ~ ~ O ~~ ~ IN N ~ ~~
m O O N N
fn ~+
7 ~ O~Q O ~
Cfl O
~ p ~ _
O (tn9~ ~ N
Ln
- ~
C ~ ~
~ O
~ ~ C O ~ r N
d' , ~ U
N >, ~ .
~ Cfl
~
N O F- ~
~ ~ ~ N
L, U F-
o° .~ ~!-
N
N
~ ~ W ~
~ O .-~
~ ~
~ Z
~
~
~
O
O H
d~ °°
I- -o m ~ N ~
N o
ti ~'
r~ ~
V m
~
M `~
~
ti ao o V ~ .c rn
N U O
7 N M O Q O J
O M O
W H
W Z ~
0
0, L p
rn N co
~' lf') O
V O Y ~ ~
O
~ M ~
~~ ~
a~ ma °'
~ ~
c)~;0° °' rn
m~°
i-c~ ~:
~ w~
~
O
a? ~ ¢
~Q w
.J C9
a
~
1_
- ~
d Q m
. ~ ~
O ~ ~
a ~ ~ M
M
a~
V
LL ~ C ~
~ ~~
o a~ ~ ~
O ~
~
cq ti ~
~
~ ~,
~ -~ ~.
>~ ~
rn
N ~
~r,
p ~
~ r
o
W }, ~
~
W ~
o
~ v
~
m ~ M a
J
~ ~
~
O ~
~
~ ~
O N ~
M o
~
p Z ~ ~ ~
cv ~ O
N '~
'~ ~ •~ `~'I
~
U ~ ~ ~~
0 ~
~ ~ 0 v~
c
Z o
V y
o
Q
LL
~ ~
y
Q C
~ ~ O a
E
~ O ~
W
~
O M
~ i
~ G1
~
O O
ti M vl
i ~
v m
E
~ O O ~ O
O ~
O ~ ~ O ~v~+
O , O
O O
O c
a~
ti
~ \
` O =
~„~ ~ ~p M \ O
~ ~ a
C = ~ O LL
~ ~ ~ O K U O ~ - co Q U ~ a
H ~
. 'a ~ W
° V ~
~ ~
U ~
' ~ K (7 m N
>
W
Q v
~ o ~
a ~ ~
~ o 0o V ~
p
~
v ~ o m ~ Q
o ~ ~
w a ~
m N
a ~ N = _ ~ ~
U o
~ `~' N
c a'
~ N L y ~ a c c
Page 9
~1 I;~
rn z
W o
W
W
~ v o a o
o o
c
0
~
o
a
o
U
~, ~~ s. o
.~ o ~. o ~o
~ 0
o o
o W
a ~ c c ~
~ ~
W a~^a
f~ y R
a~
a i
A „ .-~
O ~www
a
W r~ o
o
r ~
A W N _
~
c
M
~o
N
00
~
0~
p~
~
cv~
I~ O
~ O
a
Q
~
~
~
~^
O~
_
o0
~t
N
O~
~Wh~
V ~ N
Q
~
69
~
~ 0~
N ~o ~n
~
~,
Ey
~
69
l~ N
69 N
O~
~~
/ 69
W
~ a
~ o 0 0 0
W F U ~ ~~..' rn ~ N ~p l~
a ~-+ v, ~ ~ ~ o
N
~ ~ o ~,
I~1
U ~" y ~ ~
~~~~
~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~
v
o
~o W V [-~ a
~
~,
~
a ~
Z
~
~ ~
~ E
O a as b oo
O --~ o ~
M
U
~
a A
~ wg
~ b °
`'
~ ~ ~
M
~ ~
~ N
~
~,
N
Q~ Or ,~ L.
y P! v ~ N
69 ~
~ `n
59 ~
~D N
69 N
z r
`~ O\
3
(~
~--~ O O y ~ ~
~ •-, ^-
w
a ~ z aa
a v ~
O
~ A w
U
W
O
U
A ~ ~ ~ ~? ~ ~
~ ~ ~, V a .
~.,~0 y
z a C7 ~ ~ ~ o o
,~
w~H
wh
o
w ~
~
a .~
~ ~ °' U ~ C is °' P.
~ r.
~ c ~ °' d ,~
~ o
O a ~'
~
z ~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
a i
o
W
v
w
° ~
a
~ ~
a ~ ~
•
' .~ .~ c a .~ ~ ~
~
y
a °: U Sr
v ~
a (~
~ L .Q y ..Di
A
'~ ~ a A a, w
W '~
o ~ °
o
~
~
o
U z w~
~~ ~ ~ ~
, ~ ~ ~,
~ ~ „
A ~
a
Page 10
y, pp ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ o o
~w~~
W ..~
W ~'aw
~"
z
W ~
~
L,
~ o~~ oo~,~rn
o0 0 0o v~
O
~ a
Q ~ ~ 00
~-. N
O 00 ~h M
v'~
~]
~ F ~ .
M ~ ~
~
0 ~ l0
~
69 69 ~ 69
W H N
az~
Woo
U N
c~
~
°o o°OO
o
_ .
~
~ ~
~
~~~ ~ °~
~~
w w
U
W H U
a ~ ~
N
~ _
~ ~ '~
~ '"
E-~ ~ ~" w
A o
~
W W ~ U ~
~
~
z
~,W [~ ~ ~ ~
3. m O Over
N A M Orn.-.Q,
00 O o0 ~
E..y O ~ ~+ ~ 'S7 ~ ~ '"" ~ 00 ~ .-+
M
V ~ ~ ~ C ~ O
~ O~ l~ M ~ ~ O N
O by
W Q °' N
r.+
3. ~ M ~ ~' `' `° ~
~
,
M
'ti
~ ~y ~ ~
~ v~9
~
~
'C ~ W ~ ~ ~
y s
~- ~
~ ~ V y > ee
'
a ~ A
a ~
~
~
O
O
U
rr~
W ~ w
~ a o ~
Z ~ Q
0
~ U _
Y
~ ° ~
F ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
y
o~c~
AUL7
~ ,
~ o o ~,
~~~b
~ ~
z
~ o ~ ~, x ~ ~ ~
~ W
~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~
w ~ E,.y ~
°' > .~ ~ o
o ~ ~ ~ o ;~
.~ F" o k"
O ~ ~ i ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~a ~ ~° a~
yx
Wr ~~
~
O
^
~
C~ .
y~
a F
y
~
~~ w ~ O
U
a
~w
~, ~ ~ ~
W z ~ :ow ~ ¢A"ae p
xi ~ ~ Q~ o ~ ~~~~ °
U ° ~ w~Ca ~ ~' Via,
~ a: F, ~ Q v~ v~ Q
a -~
Z ~
w, A c
OON c
O M ~ +.+
_M000
V [~
~t ~' 00 C 00
O 00 00
A W rnrn~ c rnrno,rn
A
13
0
U
Page 11
RESOLUTION NO. -08 ~ J J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
MAHING FINDINGS REGARDING UNEXPENDED
TRAFFIC MITIGATION CONTRIBUTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-2008
Recital
The City has collected contributions for completion of off-site public traffic improvements needed as a result of
new development, which will not be expended within five years after deposit. The improvements are described
in the 2008-2013 Ca ital Im rovement Pro am and include the im rovements described below:
Unexpended
Project Name Developer
Fees
1. Dou ert Road - Amador Valley Boulevard North to City Limit as of June 30, 2008
2. St. Patrick Way - Re Tonal to Golden Gate $294,364
3. Dou ert Rd Im vts -Houston Pl North to Amador Valle Blvd $395,266
4. Bike Lane - Amador Valley Blvd Sta ecoach Rd to Dou hert Rd $148,791
5. Dublin Blvd Irri rovements -Sierra Ct to Dublin Ct $ 51,507
6. Scarlett Drive Extension -Between Dublin Blvd &Dou ert Rd $509,046
$ 28,801
2. The Six Projects described in the recital above are referred to as the "Six Traffic Improvements."
The City Council finds, on the basis of the foregoing ReFci'taldsl that:
A. The contributions which have been collected for the Six Traffic Improvements will remain unexpended after
Fiscal Year 2007-2008,
B. The contributions which have been collected for the Six Traffic Improvements will remain committed for
construction of the improvements identified in the adopted Capital Improvement Program;
C. The purpose for which the contributions will be used is construction of the Six Traffic Improvements, as
described above and in the 2008 - 2013 Capital Improvement Program,
D. The contributions were collected to make the Six Traffic Improvements, which improvements will mitigate
traffic impacts caused by the new development projects which paid the contributions, and
E. The contributions which have been collected for the Six Traffic Improvements are needed for construction of the
Six Traffic Improvements.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 16th day of December 2008
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
G:~Ab1600 -Impact Fees~FY 07-08Uesolution08.doc
Mayor
ATTACHMENT 2