Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Meeting Minutes * * * * PA 83-079 KINHAL DAYCARE CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mr. DeLuca presented information regarding the Conditional Use Permit application for a daycare center, located in an R-I-B-E (Single Family) Residential District, for a maximum of 16 children, as an integral part of the Dublin Pre-school, located immediately to the west of the site. Staff recommended approval with conditions. Veena Kinhall, applicant, was present, and acknowledged that she was in agreement with all conditions of approval. After a brief discussion, the public hearing was closed, and Cm. Vonheeder made the motion to approve the Conditional Use Permit with conditions as set forth by Staff. The motion was seconded by Cm. Alexander and passed by unanimous vote of the Commissioners present. RESOLUTION NO. 84-02 APPROVING PA 83-079 KINHAL DAYCARE CENTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION * * * * UNFINISHED BUSINESS REVIEW OF AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Mr. Tong briefly explained the information provided to the Commissioners regarding amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance, and offered assistance and answers to any questions they might have. There were no questions. * * * * NEW BUSINESS DISCUSSION OF JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION Mr. Tong presented information regarding the proposed joint Planning Commissioners meeting, noting that Dublin had previously offered to host the meeting. He suggested two dates in February as possible meeting dates (February 23, as first choice, and February 16, as alternate.) February 23, 1984, was selected as the preferred meeting date. TOpics of discussion were suggested by the Commissioners, in the following priority: 1) Valley-wide Planning Coordination 2) Housing 3) Transportation 4) BART The Commissioners requested that Staff invite the City of San Ramon to have its Planning Commissioners participate in the meeting. Cm. Vonheeder commented that she took exception to a letter from Mr. Fraley, Alameda County Planning Director, suggesting topics of discussion, and she wished that Alameda County to participate in the discussion, strictly as an observer. It was agreed that Staff should arrange for the meeting location. * * * * The Planning Commissioners Institute was briefly discussed, with more detailed information expected soon. * * * * ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~L-T~ Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director