Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
*February 18, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda Packet
February 18, 2020 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 1 of 3 REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, February 18, 2020 Council Chamber, 100 Civic Plaza DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL A G E N D A • Agendas and Staff Reports are posted on the City’s Internet Website (www.dublin.ca.gov) • Agendas may be picked up at the City Clerk’s Office for no charge, or to request information on being placed on the annual subscription list, please call 833-6650. • A complete packet of information containing Staff Reports and exhibits relate to each item is available of public review at least 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting or, in the event that it is delivered to City Council members less than 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting, as soon as it is so delivered. The packet is available in the City Clerk’s Office and also at the Dublin Library. REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 3.1. Introduction of Visit Tri-Valley’s New President and CEO Tracy Farhad The City Council will receive an introduction to Visit Tri-Valley’s new President and CEO Tracy Farhad. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the introduction. 3.2. Employee Introduction New member of City Staff will be introduced: Danielle Muther, Office Assistant II, City Manager's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Welcome the new City of Dublin Staff member. 3.3. 2020 St. Patrick's Day Celebration Festivities Report The City Council will receive a preview of the 2020 St. Patrick's Day Celebration festivities which will be held March 14 and 15. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. 3.4. Public Comment At this time, the public is permitted to address the City Council on non-agendized items. Please step to the podium and clearly state your name for the record. COMMENTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with State Law, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. The Council may respond to statements made or questions asked, or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the matter. Any member of the public may contact the City Clerk’s Office related to the proper procedure to place an item on a future City Council agenda. The exceptions under which the City Council MAY discuss and/or take action on items not appearing on the agenda are contained in Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(1)(2)(3). 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the City Council with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the City Council who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor to remove the item. 4.1. Approval of the February 4, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the February 4, 2020 Regular City Council meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the February 4, 2020 Regular City Council meeting. February 18, 2020 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 2 of 3 4.2. Establish Right-Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road Alignment Project The City Council will review and consider an Initial Study/C EQA Addendum and will consider adopting a Resolution of Intention to establish the precise alignment for the right-of- way lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit Line. The proposed alignment will revise the existing alignment in the northerly segment of Tassajara Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution of Intention to Establish Precise Alignment for the Future Right-Of- Way Lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit Line. 4.3. Appointing Directors to Pooled Liability Assurance Network (PLAN) Joint Exercise of Powers (JPA) to Represent the City of Dublin The City Council will designate employees to represent the City of Dublin on the Board of Directors to the Pooled Liability Assurance Network Joint Powers Authority. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 97-18 and Appointing Directors to PLAN JPA on Behalf of the City of Dublin. 4.4. City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2019 The City Council will receive an informational report of the City’s investments through the quarter ending December 31, 2019 including a monthly transaction ledger. The City’s investment portfolio for this period totaled $296,625,984 (book value) with an average market yield of 1.80%. As required by the Policy, the City Treasurer (Administrative Services Director) affirms that the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. 4.5. Revisions to the Personnel System The City Council will consider proposed changes to the City’s current Personnel System. The proposed adjustments are based on the need to revise the City’s Classification Plan, Salary Plan and Management Leave and Benefit Plans for new positions exempt from competitive service. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the following: 1) Resolution Amending the Classification Plan; 2) Resolution Amending the Salary Plan for Management Positions Exempt from Competitive Service; 3) Resolution Amending the Salary Plan for Part-Time Personnel; and 4) Resolution Amending the Management Positions Exempt from Competitive Service Resolution and Prescribing Leave Benefits for the Designated Positions. 4.6. Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from December 1, 2019 - January 31, 2020 totaling $10,890,854.91. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION – NONE. 6. PUBLIC HEARING – NONE. February 18, 2020 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 3 of 3 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7.1. Shared Autonomous Vehicle Testing - Project Implementation The City Council will receive a presentation on the implementation of the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority Shared Autonomous Vehicle testing program in Dublin. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the presentation. 8. NEW BUSINESS 8.1. Informational Report on Sixth Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation and Housing Element Update The City Council will receive information about the upcoming sixth cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and Housing Element Update. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. 9. OTHER BUSINESS Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234). 10. ADJOURNMENT This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a) If requested, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.2, this agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office (925) 833 - 6650 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Mission The City of Dublin promotes and supports a high quality of life, ensures a safe and secure environment, and fosters new opportunities. Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Introduction of Visit Tri-Valley’s New President and CEO Tracy Farhad Prepared by: Hazel L. Wetherford, Economic Development Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive an introduction to Visit Tri-Valley’s new President and CEO Tracy Farhad. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the introduction. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. DESCRIPTION: The City Council will receive an introduction to Visit Tri-Valley’s new President and CEO Tracy Farhad. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. 3.1 Packet Pg. 4 Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Employee Introduction Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: New member of City Staff will be introduced: Danielle Muther, Office Assistant II, City Manager's Office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Welcome the new City of Dublin Staff member. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. DESCRIPTION: New member of City Staff will be introduced: Danielle Muther, Office Assistant II, City Manager's Office. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. 3.2 Packet Pg. 5 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: None. 3.2 Packet Pg. 6 Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: 2020 St. Patrick's Day Celebration Festivities Report Prepared by: Rich Jochner, Recreation Supervisor EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive a preview of the 2020 St. Patrick's Day Celebration festivities which will be held March 14 and 15. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The 2020 St. Patrick's Day Celebration is budgeted to bring in $137,935 in revenue. Expenditures associated with putting on the festival and supporting the parade are budgeted at $111,445. The Shamrock 5K Fun Run and Walk is budgeted separately and is expected to bring in $53,500 in revenue, with $31,778 in expenditures. The cost of Police Services is not included in these numbers and is typically about $25,000. The total budget impact (revenues less expenditures) for the event is a positive $23,212. DESCRIPTION: The City of Dublin’s 37th annual St. Patrick's Day Celebration will be held on March 14 and 15, 2020, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Dublin Civic Center. The free two -day festival attracts crowds from all over the Bay Area and is expected to draw as many as 80,000 people. The festival will have a strong focus on Irish music, dance, food, and drink , and will feature three outdoor stages. The Dance Stage will be devoted to Irish dancers performing Irish Step Dance. The Pub Stage will offer a mix of Irish music including Celtic rock, Irish pub and traditional Irish folk music as well as a roaming bagpiper and leprechaun. The Mainstage headliner bands include the popular Celtic rock band, Tempest, The U2 experience band Zoo Station, the high energy Irish Band Fast & Vengefully and to close each day of the festival the Killer Dueling Pianos. 3.3 Packet Pg. 7 Page 2 of 3 The festival will also feature an authentic Irish tearoom in the City Hall lobby and Regional Meeting Room, serving tea cookies, scones, and shortbread along with fresh- brewed Irish tea in china cups. Celtic Food Court vendors will sell traditional Irish fish and chips, bangers and mash, and boxty (Irish potato pancakes) along with the Irish American favorite, corned beef and cabbage. Guests can also find Irish-inspired food items such as Guinness marinated tri-tip, corned beef sliders, and banger corn dogs. The Dublin Rotary Club will again manage beverage operations, with two bars serving Guinness, Harp, and Smithwick’s beers on tap, in addition to wine. Vendors in the Irish Marketplace will sell Irish tartan kilts, scarves, wraps and capes, Celtic jewelry, artwork, metalwork, pottery, Irish shortbread, scones, and cakes. More than 100 other arts and crafts vendors will also be on hand. Carnival rides will be set up in a portion of the Dublin Sports Grounds parking lot. New this year will be a Petting Zoo featuring an array of miniature animals such as mini -horses, goats, sheep, silkie chickens, rabbits, and ducks. A monster mural activity will be incorporated into the Festival to promote the 2020 census. Attendees will get to paint a section of the mural. Also, the new temporary art program featuring 20 artist painted Adirondack chairs promoting “Dublin, the New American Backyard” will be on display. After the Festival the chairs will be moved to various City facilities and private businesses throughout Spring and Summer. The chairs will be auctioned off in September. On Saturday morning Fire Station #16 will host the annual Firefighters Pancake Breakfast starting at 7:00 a.m., serving green pan cakes, sausage, eggs, juice, and coffee. Breakfast is $5 per person for this fundraiser and tickets can be purchased at the door. The Dublin Lions Club will host the 37th annual St. Patrick's Day Parade, starting on Saturday at 9:30 a.m. The parade begins at Dublin Boulevard and Amador Plaza Road, traveling east on Dublin Boulevard, north on Village Parkway, and west on Amador Valley Boulevard to end near the Dublin Senior Center. The parade is expected to feature more than 80 entries, including local mar ching bands, floats, equestrian groups, bagpipers, and community groups. Sunday morning, the City will sponsor the Shamrock 5K Fun Run and Walk, with the race ending at the festival Main Stage. Runners will enjoy live music, pizza, fruit , and other giveaways in the post-race area, and many festival vendors will open early to welcome runners at the finish line. The Shamrock 5K is expected to attract more than 2,000 participants. Sponsorship and vendor recruitment are underway for this year’s events and Staff is on track to meet or exceed 2019 totals. Sponsors for the festival and Fun Run include Kaiser Permanente, Lucky California, Dicks Sporting Goods, Geico, All Natural Stone, and many more. To mitigate traffic and parking issues throughout the weekend, Staff has arranged offsite parking for sponsors, volunteers, and vendors at Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., 5160 Hacienda Drive, with a free shuttle bus operating 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. both days. The shuttle is also available to the public. In addition, Staff is reaching out to local 3.3 Packet Pg. 8 Page 3 of 3 corporations, particularly those west of Civic Center, to request use of their parking lots. The City provides participating business owners with insurance and arranges to have their lots swept clean after the event. Furthermore, the City is once again partnering with BART and LAVTA to offer free bus rides from both BART stations via the Wheels Rapid 30R bus and discount rides within Dublin via Lyft, Uber, and DeSoto Cab. Cycling to the festival is also encouraged, and the City will provide free secure bike parking at two bike valet stations. Please note, the Civic Center parking lot will be closed beginning Friday, March 13, while setup is taking place. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: Neighboring businesses have been provided reminders about the event and information related to impacts on traffic and parking. ATTACHMENTS: None. 3.3 Packet Pg. 9 Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of the February 4, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the February 4, 2020 Regular City Council meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the February 4, 2020 Regular City Council meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. DESCRIPTION: The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the February 4, 2020 Regular City Council meeting. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Minutes of the February 4, 2020 Regular City Council Meeting 4.1 Packet Pg. 10 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REGULAR MEETING – FEBRUARY 4, 2020 DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 4, 2020 A Regular Meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, February 4, 2020, in the City Council Chamber. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM., by Mayor Haubert. 1. Call to Order Attendee Name Title Status David Haubert Mayor Present Arun Goel Vice Mayor Present Melissa Hernandez Councilmember Present Jean Josey Councilmember Present Shawn Kumagai Councilmember Present 2. Pledge of Allegiance - The pledge of allegiance was recited by the City Council, Staff, and those present at the meeting. 3. Oral Communications 3.1. Employee Introductions The City Council welcomed the new Dublin Staff members. 3.2. Presentation by East Bay Housing Organizations (EBHO) Linda Smith, City Manager, stated that this item would be moved to a future City Council meeting. 3.3. Public Comment Shelly, Dublin resident, and children with Soaring City, provided public comment. Shawn Costello, Dublin resident, provided public comment. Anna, Dublin resident, provided public comment. 4. Consent Calendar By consensus, the City Council agreed to pull Items 4.6 and 4.7 for further discussion. 4.1.a Packet Pg. 11 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . D r a f t M i n u t e s o f t h e F e b r u a r y 4 , 2 0 2 0 R e g u l a r C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g ( D r a f t M i n u t e s o f t h e F e b r u a r y 4 , 2 0 2 0 R e g u l a r M e e t i n g ) DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 4, 2020 Item 4.8 was pulled from the consent calendar to be considered at a future City Council meeting. 4.1. Approved the minutes of the January 14, 2020 Regular City Council meeting. 4.2. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 05 -20 DECLARING WEEDS AND COMBUSTIBLE REFUSE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE ABATEMENT THEREOF 4.3. Approved the budget change for the Purchase of a Cargo Trailer and Related Equipment and Supplies for Dublin Police Services. 4.4. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 06 – 20 AMENDING THE DUBLIN TRAFFIC CODE APPROVING AN EMERGENCY VEHICLE PARKING ZONE ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF CLARK AVENUE SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD FRONTING THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 4.5. Waived the reading and adopted ORDINANCE NO. 01 - 20 AMENDING CHAPTER 4.40 (TOBACCO RETAILERS) TO TITLE 4 (REGULATION OF BUSINESSES) OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE 4.9. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 08 – 20 MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE ALAMEDA COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES 4.1.a Packet Pg. 12 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . D r a f t M i n u t e s o f t h e F e b r u a r y 4 , 2 0 2 0 R e g u l a r C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g ( D r a f t M i n u t e s o f t h e F e b r u a r y 4 , 2 0 2 0 R e g u l a r M e e t i n g ) DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 4, 2020 RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVED BY: Jean Josey, Councilmember SECOND: Melissa Hernandez, Vice Mayor AYES: Josey, Kumagai, Goel, Haubert, Hernandez 4.6. Youth Advisory Committee Mini Grant Program Funding Allocations Vice Mayor Goel recused himself from Item 4.6. On motion of Councilmember Josey, seconded by Councilmember Hernandez, and by unanimous vote (Vice Mayor Goel recusing himself), the City Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 07 - 20 APPROVING FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINI GRANT PROGRAM with the addition of the donation of Performing Arts Center hours to Ted Ex. 4.7. Grafton Plaza Daycare and Retail Project (PLPA 2018-00010) - Second Reading On motion of Councilmember Kumagai, seconded by Mayor Haubert, and by majority vote (Vice Mayor Goel voting no), the City Council waived the reading and adopted ORDINANCE NO. 02 – 20 AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT WITH AMENDED STAGE 1 AND STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE GRAFTON DAYCARE AND RETAIL PROJECT PLPA 2018-00010 5. Written Communication - None 6. Public Hearing - None 4.1.a Packet Pg. 13 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . D r a f t M i n u t e s o f t h e F e b r u a r y 4 , 2 0 2 0 R e g u l a r C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g ( D r a f t M i n u t e s o f t h e F e b r u a r y 4 , 2 0 2 0 R e g u l a r M e e t i n g ) DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 4, 2020 7. Unfinished Business - None 8. New Business 8.1. Proposed Updates to the Public Art Master Plan The City Council received the update of the Public Art Master Plan. 8.2. Update on Housing Legislation and Affordable Housing Opportunities The City Council received the update of housing legislation and affordable housing opportunities. 8.3. Discussion Regarding City Council Salary By consensus, the City Council directed Staff to return with an ordinance to increase the City Council salary by 5% per year, for the past two years, for a new salary of $1,335.49 per month, with the Mayor receiving $100 more per month. 9. Other Business Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234). By consensus, the City Council directed Staff to return with an informational item regarding data on the taxation of delivery of recreational cannabis and research on what other jurisdictions are doing. 10. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:42 p.m. in honor of Sean Diamond, all our fallen troops, and former BART Board member, Bob Allen. Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ City Clerk 4.1.a Packet Pg. 14 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . D r a f t M i n u t e s o f t h e F e b r u a r y 4 , 2 0 2 0 R e g u l a r C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g ( D r a f t M i n u t e s o f t h e F e b r u a r y 4 , 2 0 2 0 R e g u l a r M e e t i n g ) Page 1 of 4 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Establish Right-Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road Alignment Project Prepared by: Erwin Ching, Associate Civil Engineer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will review and consider an Initial Study/CEQA Addendum and will consider adopting a Resolution of Intention to establish the precise alignment for the right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and the Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit Line. The proposed alignment will revise the existing alignment in the northerly segment of Tassajara Road. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution of Intention to Establish Precise Alignment for the Future Right- Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and Alameda -Contra Costa County Limit Line. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Tassajara Road Realignment and Widening Project, included in the City’s approved 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (ST0116), is part of the larger multi- jurisdictional Tassajara Road/Camino Tassajara Realignment Project that extends from Palisades Drive in the City to Windemere Parkway in Contra Costa County. This project will be a joint effort between the City and Contra Costa County. The City’s share of the total project’s estimated cost is $12.5 million, which Staff anticipates being funded by State Gas Tax, Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB-1) funds, and Traffic Impact Fees. There is no impact to the General Fund. 4.2 Packet Pg. 15 Page 2 of 4 DESCRIPTION: Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.68 - Establishing Right-of-Way Lines allows for establishment of right-of-way lines for purposes of future roadway extension, widening, or creation of space for future utilities, pedestrian p athways, fire and police emergency access to property, and all public rights-of-way. The Municipal Code requires the Planning Commission hold at least one public hearing on any proposed establishment of right-of-way lines. Upon completion of the hearing, the Planning Commission shall submit its report and recommendation to the City Council. Furthermore, in accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law, a planning local agency (Planning Commission) must report on the project’s conformity to the General Plan as to the location, purpose, and intent of the future right-of-way prior to the establishment of said right-of way lines. Additionally, an environmental analysis as per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) must also be completed for the proposed right-of-way alignment. On February 11, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and adopted a Resolution (Attachment 1), recommending that the City Council consider an Initial Study/CEQA Addendum (Attachment 5) and recommending that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention to establish precise alignment for the future Right -Of- Way Lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and the Alameda -Contra Costa County Limit Line. The Planning Commission also reviewed and recommended the adoption of a General Plan (GP) amendment and an Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) amendment related to the Tassajara Road Alignment Project. The GP amendment and EDSP amendment did not include any land use changes, but instead proposed modify ing the number of lanes on Tassajara Road between North Dublin Ranch Drive to the Alameda -Contra Costa County Limit from six lanes to four lanes. If the City Council adopts the Resolution of Intention, a public hearing date of March 3, 2020, will be set. At the public hearing, City Council will hear public testimony, review the proposed right-of-way lines, and then consider the Initial Study/CEQA Addendum and consider establishing the right-of-way lines by the first reading of an ordinance. On this same public hearing date, City Council will also consider approving the GP amendment and EDSP amendment. ANALYSIS: The establishment of right-of-way lines are intended to reserve sufficient right-of-way for future road construction. Adoption of an ordinance to establish such lines will not result in the immediate acquisition of any property but will preclude property owners from constructing structures within the right-of-way area. The process of acquiring right-of- way will not begin until after the project’s final design has been completed to ensure that the required right-of-way has been accurately determined. Land use designations and density of development surrounding the proposed revised alignment for Tassajara Road are not modified through the proposed creation of the right-of-way lines. The existing land uses in General Plan and EDSP will remain as they currently exist. 4.2 Packet Pg. 16 Page 3 of 4 The Municipal Code requires that City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention to establish right-of-way lines (Attachment 2). The legal description and plat (Attachment 4) for the proposed right-of-way lines show the right-of-way that will be required. Only one property will be affected by the proposed revised alignment and the impact on this property is approximated in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 Assessor’s Parcel Number Property Owner Right-of-way Acquisition in Square Feet (SF) 986-0004-001-00 Singh Family Properties LP 28,696 SF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Potential environmental impacts of the project were previously assessed in the ED SP Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #91103064) in 1993, which analyzed the future development of all of Eastern Dublin, including the future widening of Tassajara Road from two to six lanes. In 2004, the City prepared an Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (SCH #2004042008) for a precise alignment of Tassajara Road for the ultimate widening to six lanes from North Dublin Ranch Drive to the Alameda-Contra Costa County border. The current project would reduce the number of travel lanes within the same area as previously studied, from six lanes to four lanes. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Dublin completed an Initial Study/CEQA Addendum (Attachment 5) which analyzed the proposed project including its footprint and the proposed permanent right-of-way lines for Tassajara Road, and concluded that the project would not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in 1993 EIR or the 2004 IS/MND and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. No further environmental review is required for the project. The Planning Commission adopted a Resolution (Attachment 1) on February 11, 2020, recommending to the City Council to review and consider the Tassajara Road Alignment IS/Addendum and to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Establish Precise Alignment for the Future Right-of-way Lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and Alameda-Contra Costa County Limit Line. Prior to introducing an ordinance establishing the right-of-way lines, the City Council will first consider the IS/Addendum for the project and then consider approving the GP and EDSP amendments. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: A copy of this report has been provided to all property owners abutting the proposed revised alignment. 4.2 Packet Pg. 17 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution Recommending that the City Council Consider an IS/CEQA Addendum and Adopt of a Resolution of Intention to Establish Precise Alignment for Tassajara Road 2. Resolution of Intention to Establish Precise Alignment for the Future Right-Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road 3. Exhibit 1 to Attachments 1 and 2 4. Exhibit A to Attachments 1 and 2 (Plat & Legal Description) 5. Initial Study/CEQA Addendum 6. CIP ST0116 Tassajara Realignment and Widening 4.2 Packet Pg. 18 RESOLUTION NO. 20-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER AN INITIAL STUDY/CEQA ADDENDUM PREPARED FOR THE TASSAJARA ROAD ALIGNMENT PROJECT AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR THE FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR TASSAJARA ROAD BETWEEN PALISADES DRIVE AND ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIMIT LINE WHEREAS, the City of Dublin adopted Right-Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road by Ordinance No. 20-99 and Ordinance No. 21-04; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the Dublin City Council adopted Re solution No. 51-93, certifying an Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan (Eastern Dublin Environmental Impact Report, SCH #91103064) (the “1993 EIR”) that analyzed the ultimate development of Tassajara Road at six travel lanes; and WHEREAS, in 2004, the Dublin City Council adopted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for a precise alignment of a future six-lane major roadway within the Eastern Dublin Planning Area (Tassajara Road/Fallon Road Ultimate Road Right -of-Way Alignment Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, SCH #2004042008) (the “2004 IS/MN”); and WHEREAS, in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 7.68, the City of Dublin has proposed a revised alignment for portions of Tassajara Road that differs slightly from the alignment previously approved in May 2004 (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the Project includes a programmatic change in the number of ultimate travel lanes from six lanes to four lanes for the portion of Tassajara Road as depicted on Exhibit 1, attached to this Resolution and hereby incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, the affected segment of Tassajara Road is between Palisades Drive and the Alameda-Contra Costa County limit line; and WHEREAS, to complete the Project, the alignment of Right-Of-Way Lines on Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and Alameda -Contra Costa County line must be adjusted; and WHEREAS, the Right-Of-Way Lines are appropriate and compatible with the existing and planned land uses and will not overburden public services; and WHEREAS, the properties through which the proposed Right-Of-Way Lines pass are within the boundary of Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and therefore will be encompassed by, and consistent with, the General Plan; and WHEREAS, precise alignment for the future Right-Of-Way Lines will not have a substantial adverse effect on safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or public improvements; and 4.2.a Packet Pg. 19 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n R e s o l u t i o n R e c o m m e n d i n g t h a t t h e C i t y C o u n c i l C o n s i d e r a n I S / C E Q A A d d e n d u m a n d A d o p t o f a WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21166, et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 require that when an EIR or negative declaration has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that one or more of the following exists: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, Dublin has completed an Initial Study/CEQA Addendum (the “Addendum”) for the Project as shown in the Initial Study/CEQA Addendum for the Tassajara Road Ultimate Right -Of-Way Alignment Project prepared by Jerry Haag on January 2020 is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Addendum concluded that the Project would not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in 1993 EIR or the 2004 IS/MN and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met; and WHEREAS, the Dublin Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 11, 2020 on the proposed establishment of the Right-Of-Way Lines, for which proper notice of the public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and 4.2.a Packet Pg. 20 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n R e s o l u t i o n R e c o m m e n d i n g t h a t t h e C i t y C o u n c i l C o n s i d e r a n I S / C E Q A A d d e n d u m a n d A d o p t o f a WHEREAS, the Dublin Planning Commission considered the Addendum as well as the 1993 EIR and 2004 IS/MN referenced above, before taking action on the Project, and the Planning Commission did further hear and consider all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove as set forth before taking any action; and WHEREAS, all of the above Resolutions and Ordinances are incorporated by reference and are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community Development Department, Dublin City Hall, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, CA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, on the basis of substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to, the 1993 EIR, the 2004 IS/MN, the Addendum, and all related information presented to the Planning Commission, that the environmental effects of the proposed Project were sufficiently analyzed and that an Addendum is the appropriate environmental document for the proposed Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Project will not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in the previous CEQA documents and no further environmental review under CEQA is required . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention to establish Right -Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and Alameda-Contra Costa County. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of February 2020 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Planning Manager 3476044.2 4.2.a Packet Pg. 21 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n R e s o l u t i o n R e c o m m e n d i n g t h a t t h e C i t y C o u n c i l C o n s i d e r a n I S / C E Q A A d d e n d u m a n d A d o p t o f a RESOLUTION NO. XX-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR THE FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR TASSAJARA ROAD BETWEEN PALISADES DRIVE AND ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIMIT LINE WHEREAS, the City of Dublin adopted Right-Of-Way Lines for Tassajara Road by Ordinance No. 20-99 and Ordinance No. 21-04; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the Dublin City Council adopted Resolution No. 51-93, certifying an Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan (Eastern Dublin Environmental Impact Report, SCH #91103064) (the “1993 EIR”) that analyzed the ultimate development of Tassajara Road at six travel lanes; and WHEREAS, in 2004, the Dublin City Council adopted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for a precise alignment of a future six-lane major roadway within the Eastern Dublin Planning Area (Tassajara Road/Fallon Road Ultimate Road Right-of-Way Alignment Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, SCH #2004042008) (the “2004 IS/MN”); and WHEREAS, in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 7.68, the City of Dublin has proposed a revised alignment for portions of Tassajara Road that differs slightly from the alignment previously approved in May 2004 (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the Project includes a programmatic change in the number of ultimate travel lanes from six lanes to four lanes for the portion of Tassajara Road as depicted on Exhibit 1, attached to this Resolution and hereby incorporated by reference; and WHEREAS, the affected segment of Tassajara Road is between Palisades Drive and the Alameda-Contra Costa County limit line; and WHEREAS, to complete the Project, the alignment of Right-Of-Way Lines on Tassajara Road between Palisades Drive and Alameda -Contra Costa County line must be adjusted; and WHEREAS, the Right-Of-Way Lines are appropriate and compatible with the existing and planned land uses and will not overburden public services; and WHEREAS, the properties through which the proposed Right-Of-Way Lines pass are within the boundary of Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and therefore will be encompassed by, and consistent with, the General Plan; and WHEREAS, precise alignment for the future Right-Of-Way Lines will not have a substantial adverse effect on safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or public improvements; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21166, et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 require that when an EIR 4.2.b Packet Pg. 22 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . R e s o l u t i o n o f I n t e n t i o n t o E s t a b l i s h P r e c i s e A l i g n m e n t f o r t h e F u t u r e R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] or negative declaration has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR or negative declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, that one or more of the following exists: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, Dublin has completed an Initial Study/CEQA Addendum (the “Addendum”) for the Project as shown in the Initial Study/CEQA Addendum for the Tassajara Road Ultimate Right -Of-Way Alignment Project prepared by Jerry Haag on January 2020 is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Addendum concluded that the Project would not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in 1993 EIR or the 2004 IS/MN and no other CEQA standards for supplemental revisions are met; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after hearing and considering all said reports, recommendations and testimony at a public hearing on February 11, 2020, adopted Resolution 20- __, recommending that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, on the basis of substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but not limited to, the 1993 EIR, the 2004 IS/MN, the Addendum, and all related information presented to the City Council, that 4.2.b Packet Pg. 23 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . R e s o l u t i o n o f I n t e n t i o n t o E s t a b l i s h P r e c i s e A l i g n m e n t f o r t h e F u t u r e R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] the environmental effects of the proposed Project were sufficiently analyzed and that an Addendum is the appropriate environmental document for the proposed Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Project will not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in the previous CEQA documents and no further environmental review under CEQA is required. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts this Resolution of Intention and calls for a public hearing pursuant to Sections 7.68.080 through 7.68.100 of the Dublin Municipal Code, at 7:00 p.m. on March 3, 2020, in the City of Dublin City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, to hear protests and objections to the establishment of the proposed Right-Of-Way lines as depicted on the legal description and plat attached hereto as Exhibit A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is directed to post this Resolution of Intention in accordance with Section 7.68.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code at least 10 days before the public hearing. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2020 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 3476237.1 4.2.b Packet Pg. 24 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . R e s o l u t i o n o f I n t e n t i o n t o E s t a b l i s h P r e c i s e A l i g n m e n t f o r t h e F u t u r e R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] 4.2.c Packet Pg. 25 At t a c h m e n t : 3 . E x h i b i t 1 t o A t t a c h m e n t s 1 a n d 2 ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.d Packet Pg. 26 At t a c h m e n t : 4 . E x h i b i t A t o A t t a c h m e n t s 1 a n d 2 ( P l a t & L e g a l D e s c r i p t i o n ) ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.d Packet Pg. 27 At t a c h m e n t : 4 . E x h i b i t A t o A t t a c h m e n t s 1 a n d 2 ( P l a t & L e g a l D e s c r i p t i o n ) ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.d Packet Pg. 28 At t a c h m e n t : 4 . E x h i b i t A t o A t t a c h m e n t s 1 a n d 2 ( P l a t & L e g a l D e s c r i p t i o n ) ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 29 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 30 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 31 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 32 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 33 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 34 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 35 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 36 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 37 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 38 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 39 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 40 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 41 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 42 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 43 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 44 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 45 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 46 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 47 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 48 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 49 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 50 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 51 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 52 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 53 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 54 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 55 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 56 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 57 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 58 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 59 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 60 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 61 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 62 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 63 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 64 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 65 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 66 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 67 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 68 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 69 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 70 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 71 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 72 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 73 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 74 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 75 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 76 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 77 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 78 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 79 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 80 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 81 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 82 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 83 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 84 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 85 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 86 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 87 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 88 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 89 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 90 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 91 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 92 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 93 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 94 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 95 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 96 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 97 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 98 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 99 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 100 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 101 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 102 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 103 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 104 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 105 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 106 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 107 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 108 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 109 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 110 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 111 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 112 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 113 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 114 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 115 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 116 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 117 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 118 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 119 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 120 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 121 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 122 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 123 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 124 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 125 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 126 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 127 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 128 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 129 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassa Capacit Final Re By 1970 Broadw Oakland, CA (510) 763‐20 March 19, 20 jara R ty Analy eport way, Suite 740 94612 61 015 Road/C ysis 0 Caminno Tasssajaraa 4.2.e Packet Pg. 130 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Client DKS Projec Project Na Related Ta Document File Path Date Docu Versi Numb 0‐1 0‐2 0‐3 0‐4 1‐0 a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra ct Number me sk / WBS Num Name ment Issued ion ber 11/ 11/ 11/ 2/1 3/1 no Tassajara aft Report City of D 14112‐0 Tassaja mber N/A Tassaja p:\p\14 tassajar March 1 Date /18/2014 I /19/2014 R /21/2014 D 18/2015 U 19/2015 F Docume Dublin 001 ra Road/Camin ra Road/Camin 4\14112‐001 ci ra capacity ana 19, 2015 Versi D nitial Documen Reviewed and u Draft Report Updated with c Final Report i nt Descr no Tassajara Ca no Tassajara Ca ty of dublin on alysis draft tech ion Contr Description o nt updated comments from iption apacity Analys apacity Analys n‐call tassajara hnical report.d rol of Change m City of Dubli is is Draft Report rd\07 delivera docx in March t ables\camino Author JMP JMP JMP JMP/DCM JMP/DCM 19, 2015 r 4.2.e Packet Pg. 131 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Table o TABLE OF APPENDIC LIST OF FI LIST OF TA EXECUTIV STUDY SUMMA CONCLU EXISTING STUDY STUDY ANALYSIS STUDY Scena Scena Mode LEVEL O Signa Road CCTA TR ROADW INTERS CCTA TR SIGNIFI Contr City o a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra of Conten F CONTENTS .. CES ............... IGURES ......... ABLES .......... VE SUMMARY APPROACH .. ARY OF RESU USIONS ........ ROADWAY S INTERSECTIO ROADWAY SE S METHODOL SCENARIOS .. ario #1 – Fou ario #2 – Six‐l el Adjustmen OF SERVICE M alized Intersec way Segment RAVEL DEMA WAY SEGMEN ECTION VOLU RAVEL DEMA CANT IMPAC ra Costa Coun of Dublin ...... no Tassajara aft Report nts .................... .................... .................... .................... Y .................. ..................... LTS ............... ..................... SETTING ....... ONS ................ EGMENTS ..... LOGY ............ ..................... r‐lane Capaci lane Capacity ts ................. METHODOLOG ctions ........... ts .................. AND MODEL .. T VOLUME FO UME FORECAS AND MODEL R T CRITERIA ... nty and Tri‐Va ..................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... ty on Tassaja y on Tassajara ..................... GIES AND PAR ..................... ..................... ..................... ORECAST MET ST METHODO REVIEW ......... ..................... alley Transpo ..................... i .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... ...................... ...................... ...................... .................... ...................... ...................... .................... ...................... ra Road/Cam a Road/Camin ...................... RAMETERS..... ...................... ...................... ...................... THODOLOGY OLOGY ........... ...................... ...................... rtation Counc ...................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... mino Tassajara no Tassajara . ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... Y .................... ..................... ..................... ..................... cil ................. ..................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... a ................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... March .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... ...................... ...................... ...................... .................... ...................... ...................... .................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... 19, 2015 ....... I ...... II ..... III ..... III ...... 1 ....... 1 ....... 2 ....... 5 ...... 6 ....... 6 ....... 6 ...... 8 ....... 8 ....... 8 ....... 8 ....... 8 ....... 9 ....... 9 ..... 10 ..... 11 ..... 11 ..... 12 ..... 12 ..... 13 ..... 13 ..... 13 4.2.e Packet Pg. 132 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Town Caltra EXISTING EXISTIN INTERS ROADW FUTURE C 2040 LA 2040 SE INTERS ROADW FINDINGS STUDY PA Appen APPEND APPEND APPEND APPEND APPEND a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra n of Danville . ans ............... CONDITIONS NG TRAFFIC VO ECTION PEAK WAY PEAK HO CUMULATIVE AND USE DES ELECT‐LINK A ECTION PEAK WAY PEAK HO S AND CONCL ARTICIPANTS dices DIX A INTERSE DIX B ROADW DIX C MODEL DIX D LANE AS DIX E SELECT‐ no Tassajara aft Report ..................... ..................... S .................. OLUMES AND K HOUR LEVEL UR LEVEL OF E (2040) COND CRIPTION ..... NALYSIS ....... K HOUR LEVEL UR LEVEL OF LUSIONS ....... ................... ECTION LEVE WAY SEGMENT LINK VOLUM SSUMPTIONS ‐LINK ANALYS ..................... ..................... .................... D LANE CONF L OF SERVICE SERVICE ANA DITIONS ....... ..................... ..................... L OF SERVICE SERVICE ANA .................... .................... L OF SERVICE T LEVEL OF SE MES S SIS ii ...................... ...................... .................... IGURATIONS ANALYSIS (EX ALYSIS (EXIST .................... ...................... ...................... ANALYSIS (CU ALYSIS (CUMU .................... .................... E ANALYSIS ERVICE ANALY ..................... ..................... .................... .................... XISTING CON TING CONDITI .................... ..................... ..................... UMULATIVE 2 ULATIVE 2040 .................... .................... YSIS ..................... ..................... .................... ..................... DITIONS) ...... ONS) ............ .................... ..................... ..................... 2040 CONDIT 0 CONDITION .................... .................... March ...................... ...................... .................... ...................... ...................... ...................... .................... ...................... ...................... TIONS) ........... NS) ................. .................... .................... 19, 2015 ..... 14 ..... 14 .... 14 ..... 14 ..... 18 ..... 19 .... 20 ..... 20 ..... 20 ..... 24 ..... 29 .... 31 .... 32 4.2.e Packet Pg. 133 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A List of Figure 1 ‐ Figure 2 ‐ Figure 3 ‐ Figure 4 ‐ Figure 5 ‐ Figure 6 ‐ Figure 7 ‐ Figure 8 ‐ List of Table 1 – Table 2 – Table 3 – Table 4 – Table 5 – Table 6 – Table 7 – Table 8 – Table 9 – Table 10 – a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra Figures Study Area .. Lane Configu Existing Cond Existing Cond 4‐Lane Cumu 6‐Lane Cumu 4‐Lane Cumu 6‐Lane Cumu Tables Study Interse List of Deficie Signalized Int Roadway Seg Existing Cond Existing Cond 2040 Select‐L Cumulative 2 Cumulative 2 – Cumulative no Tassajara aft Report ..................... urations ........ dition Traffic dition Link Vo ulative 2040 C ulative 2040 C ulative 2040 C ulative 2040 C ections and Ju ent Intersecti tersection LO gment LOS Th ditions Interse dition Roadwa Link Analysis 2040 Conditio 2040 Conditio 2040 Conditi ..................... ..................... Volumes ...... olumes .......... Condition Lin Condition Lin Condition Tra Condition Tra urisdiction ..... ons under Fu OS Thresholds hresholds and ection Level o ay Segment L Volumes....... ons Intersectio ons Intersectio ions Roadway iii ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... k Volumes .... k Volumes .... affic Volumes affic Volumes ...................... uture 2040 Tra and Definitio d Definitions .. of Service ...... Level of Servic ...................... on Level of Se on Level of Se y Segment Le ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .................... .................... ..................... affic Conditio ons ............... ..................... ..................... ce ................. ..................... ervice – AM P ervice – PM P evel of Service ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ons ................ ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... Peak Hour ..... Peak Hour ..... e ................... March ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... 19, 2015 ....... 7 ..... 15 ..... 16 ..... 17 ..... 22 ..... 23 ..... 27 ..... 28 ....... 3 ....... 4 ....... 9 ..... 10 ..... 18 ..... 19 ..... 21 ..... 24 ..... 25 ..... 30 4.2.e Packet Pg. 134 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Execut The City o Tassajara Route of future gr developm lanes and standards Tri Valley Tassajara Town of D staff, Alam County Tr Study A Key inters Dublin, D determine operate t to evalua traffic imp Scenario # With an a City of Du the study expected Avenue, C via Highla six lanes existing tr Scenario # With an whether between demand f expected 1 Dougher a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra tive Summ of Dublin and Road/Camin Regional Sig rowth in tra ments in the p d intersection s of Contra Co y Transportat is from Dubl Danville in Co meda County ransportation Approach sections and Danville and e if two or th he roadway a te the numb pact on local #1 – Four‐lan assumed cap ublin in Alame assessed wh to divert to Collier Canyon and Road. Wh were assume ravel lanes alo #2 – Six‐lane assumed cap relevant stan I‐580 and I‐ forecast and L to attract ad rty Valley Sett no Tassajara aft Report mary d Contra Cos o Tassajara R nificance in t affic along t proximate reg n configuratio osta County, tion Plan/Act in Boulevard ontra Costa C y staff, San R n Authority st roadway seg San Ramon, hree travel la acceptably un er of lanes n roadways in t e Capacity on acity of four eda County to hether relevan use local ro n Road, and N hile the majo ed south of D ong the roadw Capacity on T pacity of six ndards would 680 to avoid LOS analysis t ditional traffi tlement Agre sta County ar Road corridor the Tri‐Valley the study ro gion. The pur on needed to the City of D tion Plan1. T in the City of County. This Ramon and D aff. gments in th and Contra anes per direc nder future (2 eeded to me the Tri‐Valley n Tassajara Ro lanes on Tas o Sycamore V nt standards oadways such North Liverm ority of Tassaj Dublin Boulev way segment Tassajara Roa lanes on Ta d be met and d congestion that widening ic of approxim eement (1994 1 re planning t r to meet fut y Transportat oadway will rpose of this o operate Ta Dublin, the Ci The study ro f Dublin in Ala study was co Danville staff, e study area Costa Coun ction are nee 2040) traffic c eet the releva y area from po oad/Camino T ssajara Road/ Valley Road in would be me h as El Charr ore Road to a jara Road/Ca vard along Ta t. ad/Camino Ta assajara Road d whether so on I‐580 an g Tassajara Ro mately 100 ve 4) to improve tr ture multi‐mo tion Plan/Act result prim study was to assajara Road ty of Danville adway segm ameda Count onducted in , and Contra a were select ty staff. The eded on Tass conditions. Tw ant standards ossible traffic Tassajara /Camino Tass n the Town of et and wheth ro Road/Fallo access Tassaj mino Tassaja assajara Road assajara d and Camin ome traffic w nd I‐680. It w oad/Camino T ehicles per ho ransportation odal transpo tion Plan and marily from o determine t d/Camino Ta e, the City of ment of Tassa ty to Sycamor collaboration Costa Count ted in consult e objective o sajara Road/ wo traffic sce s and to dete c diversions d sajara from G f Danville in C her traffic to/f on Road, Isa jara Road/Cam ara was mode d consistent o Tassajara, would use thi was determin Tassajara fro our each duri March n facilities alo rtation needs d it is expect planned res the number o ssajara to m San Ramon ajara Road/ re Valley Roa n with City of ty and Contr tation with C of the study /Camino Tass enarios were ermine the p described as f Gleason Drive Contra Costa from I‐580 w bel Avenue, mino Tassaja eled with fou with the num the study a is roadway a ned from the m four to six ing both the A 19, 2015 ong the s. It is a ted that sidential of travel eet the and the Camino d in the f Dublin ra Costa Cities of was to ajara to studied otential ollows: e in the County, would be Portola ra Road ur lanes, mber of assessed as a link e travel lanes is AM and 4.2.e Packet Pg. 135 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A PM. This Road, Wi areas sou insignifica area. It is arterials i Road is e Doughert The study traffic con including The CCTA because i Alameda travel dem link analy area that lanes. The Capacity M Summa This is an Road/Cam analysis i study area a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra is the traffic ndemere Par uth of Contra ant (less than s also not ex in Contra Cos expected to y Road/Dubli y roadway seg nditions. The the Mollar Ra A countywide t produced a countywide t mand model i ysis was cond may result f e intersection Manual analy ary of Resu n investigativ mino Tassaja ncluded leve a as listed in T no Tassajara aft Report c that would rkway and Bo a Costa Coun n 1 percent) a xpected to s sta County a relieve traff n Boulevard gments and in existing con anch Traffic Im e travel dema a more conse travel deman is included in ducted to det from widenin n and roadwa ysis methodol ults ve study to d ra acceptabl l of service a Table 1. have otherw ollinger Cany nty. The shif and does not significantly i nd Alameda ic congestion intersection. ntersections w ditions were mpact Study and model w ervative traffi nd model. The the Analysis termine trave g Tassajara R ay segment le logy. determine th y according analysis for 1 2 wise used oth on Road, Air ft in traffic f t affect the o mpact other County. How n along Dou were analyze analyzed us and the 2014 was used to f ic forecast th e detailed dis Methodology el patterns an Road/Camino evel of servic he number o to establish 12 intersectio her arterials rway Parkway from the var overall travel r intersection wever, a sligh ugherty Road ed under exist ing recent tr 4 Tri‐Valley Tr forecast the han the Dubl scussion on t y section of t nd the extent o Tassajara fro e analysis we of travel lane ed and app ons and six (6 such as Dou y and I‐680 t rious listed a distribution ns and roadw ht shift in tra d and particu ting and cum affic data fro ransportation cumulative 2 in travel dem the reason fo his report. Fu t of traffic di om four trav ere conducte es needed to licable signif 6) roadway s March ugherty Road to and from j arterials is re pattern in th way segment affic from Do ularly at the ulative (futur om multiple s n/Action Plan 2040 traffic v mand model a or selecting th urthermore, a iversion in th vel lanes to si d using the H o operate Ta ficance criter segments wit 19, 2015 d, Fallon job rich elatively he study ts along ugherty critical re 2040) sources, . volumes and the he CCTA a select‐ he study ix travel Highway assajara ria. The thin the 4.2.e Packet Pg. 136 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Table 1 – S No 1 San 2 San 3 Tass 4 Tass 5 Fall 6 Cam 7 El C 8 El C 9 Fall 10 Fall 11 Cam 12 Cam Study Roa The appl significan 1. Ta 2. Ta 3. Ta 4. C 5. C 6. C Assumptio For the p optimized consisten Level of S Intersecti intersecti hours. Th hour but Fallon Ro peak hou The Cami County G a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra Study Intersect Inte ta Rita Rd/I‐58 ta Rita Rd/Tas sajara Rd/Dub sajara Rd/Glea on Rd/Camino mino Tassajara/ Charro Rd/I‐580 Charro Rd/Fallo on Rd/Dublin B on Rd/Silvera mino Tassajara/ mino Tassajara adway Segme icable level ce is LOS E. assajara Road assajara Road assajara Road amino Tassaj amino Tassaj amino Tassaj on urpose of the d by the var t basis to asse ervice Analys ions LOS Res ons currently e Tassajara R operates una ad/Camino T r but operate no Tassajara/ eneral Plan s no Tassajara aft Report tions and Juris ersection Name 80 EB off‐ramp sajara Rd/I‐580 lin Blvd ason Dr o Tassajara/Tas /Highland Rd 0 EB off‐ramp on Rd/I‐580 WB Blvd Ranch Dr /Windemere P and Crow Can ents of services s d between Gl d between No d/Camino Tas ara from Win ara from Lusi ara from Crow e analysis, it w ious agencie ess the impac sis (Existing Tr sults – Based y operate acc oad/Dublin B acceptably at Tassajara/Tas es unacceptab /Highland Ro standard duri sdiction e p 0 WB off‐ramp ssajara Rd B ramps Pkwy nyon Rd standard for eason Drive a orth Dublin R ssajara from F ndemere Park itano Street t w Canyon Ro was assumed s under cum ct of the two raffic Conditio d on the LOS eptably acco Boulevard inte LOS E under sajara Road bly at LOS F u ad intersectio ng the AM pe 3 Owne Caltrans p Caltrans City of Dub City of Dub City of Dub Contra Cos Caltrans Caltrans City of Dub City of Dub Contra Cos Town of Da r Tassajara R and North Du anch Drive to Fallon Road to kway to Lusita o Crow Canyo ad to Sycamo d that the sig mulative (futu study scenar ons) S results und rding to appl ersection ope the City of D intersection o nder the City on operates u eak hour and rship Ci Ci blin Ci blin Ci blin Ci ta County Co Ca Ca blin Ci blin Ci ta County Co anville To Road/Camino ublin Ranch D o Fallon Road o Windemere ano Street on Road; and ore Valley Roa nalized study ure 2040) tra rios. der Existing C icable LOS st erates accept Dublin standa operates acc y of Dublin sta unacceptably d operates ac Signal Opera ity of Pleasanto ity of Pleasanto ity of Dublin ity of Dublin ity of Dublin ontra Costa Co altrans altrans ity of Dublin ity of Dublin ontra Costa Co own of Danvill o Tassajara, a rive e Parkway d ad y intersection affic conditio Conditions, n tandards duri ably at LOS C ard during the ceptably at LO andard durin y at LOS E und cceptably at L March tor Appli LO Stan on D on D D D D ounty C D D D D ounty C e D a regional ro ns will be pro ons. This pro ine of the 1 ng AM and P C during the A e PM peak ho OS D during g the AM pea der the Contr LOS C during 19, 2015 icable OS ndard D D D D D C D D D D C D oute of oactively ovides a 2 study PM peak AM peak our. The the PM ak hour. ra Costa the PM 4.2.e Packet Pg. 137 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A peak hou operates Roadway during AM faster dur Level of S Intersecti located u peak hou intersecti Table 2 – L Defic Tassajar Tassajar Fallon Source: Notes: a. Delay b. LOS = c. Analy analysis BOLD in During th than the Fallon Ro scenario. During th intersecti E standar operate w Roadway Drive ope 6‐lane sc expected a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra r. Only the i worse than th LOS Results M and PM pe ring the AM p ervice Analys ions LOS Res nder the City r or PM peak ons expected List of Deficien cient Intersect a Rd and Dubl ra Rd and Glea Rd and Dublin : DKS Associate y is in seconds = Level of Serv ysis performed s ndicates unacc e AM peak h 2014 Tri‐Vall ad/Dublin Bo he PM peak ons are expe rd under both worse than LO LOS Results erate at LOS C enarios the to operate a no Tassajara aft Report ntersection o he 2014 Tri‐V – Under Exis ak hours in b peak hour. sis (Cumulativ sults – Under y of Dublin ju k hour or bot d to operate u nt Intersections ion (#1 Del in Blvd 39 son Dr 97 Blvd 59 es, 2014 per vehicle an ice d using Synchro ceptable LOS hour, the Tas ey Transport oulevard inte k hour, the cted to opera h scenarios. A OS E under th – Under Cum C or better du segment of at LOS C or LO of Fallon Rd/ Valley Transpo ting Conditio both the nort ve/Future 204 r Cumulative urisdiction ar th according unacceptably s under Future AM Peak 1) 4‐Lane lay LOS D .9 D .8 F .5 E nd is based on a o 8.0 HCM 200 ssajara Road/ ation Plan/Ac rsection is ex Tassajara R ate worse tha Also, the Tas e six‐lane sce mulative 2040 uring AM and Tassajara Ro OS D during t 4 Camino Tass ortation Plan/ ons, all study hbound and 40 Traffic Con 2040 Condit e expected t to the City o are listed in T e 2040 Traffic C k Hour (#2) 6‐Lane Delay LOS 40.2 D 90.4 F 52.1 D average stoppe 0 based on lim /Gleason Driv ction Plan LO xpected to op Road/Gleason an the 2014 T ssajara Road/ enario. 0 Conditions, d PM peak ho oad between the AM peak ajara/Tassaja /Action Plan roadway seg southbound nditions) tions, three ( o operate un of Dublin sign Table 2. Conditions PM (#1) 4‐Lan Delay LO 96.9 73.9 168.1 ed delay. mitations in HCM ve intersectio OS E standard perate worse n Drive and Tri‐Valley Tra /Dublin Boule , all roadway ours in both d n Gleason D k hour in both ara Rd during LOS E standa ments operat directions. G (3) of the 12 nacceptably u nificant impac M Peak Hour ne (#2) 6‐ OS Delay F 136.5 E 101.5 F 188 M 2010 on is expecte d under both e than LOS D Fallon Roa nsportation P evard interse segments no directions. Un Drive and Du h directions. March g the AM pea rd. te at LOS C o Generally, spe 2 study inters under either ct criteria. Th App L Sta ‐Lane LOS F F F ed to operate scenarios w under the fo d/Dublin Bo Plan/Action P ection is expe orth of Dublin nder both 4‐la ublin Ranch D During the P 19, 2015 ak hour r better eeds are sections the AM he three plicable LOS ndard D D D e worse hile the our‐lane oulevard Plan LOS ected to n Ranch ane and Drive is M peak 4.2.e Packet Pg. 138 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A hour it op lane Scen scenarios Select‐lin there is n travel lan the study Road/Cam during the Conclus The selec both four overall tra intersecti The result similar le However, scenario p delay per time, the southbou 10% to 15 It can the scenarios any signif a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra perates at LO nario than the . k Analysis – no significant es on Tassaja y roadway fr mino Tasssaja e AM and PM sions t‐link analysi r lane and six avel distribut ons and road ts of the Cum evel of servic for intersec provides less r vehicle duri travel time s nd segment 5% travel time erefore be co that widenin icant benefit no Tassajara aft Report OS F in the no e six lane sce The results o difference in ara Road/Cam rom four lan ra by less tha M peak hours. s results indi x lane scenar tion pattern way segment mulative Cond ce with sligh ctions that a than 10 seco ng the PM p savings is gen along Tassaja e savings dur oncluded from ng Tassajara R to motorists. orthbound dir enario; howev of the select n the traffic d mino Tasssaja nes to six lan an 100 vehicle icate that the io. The shift in the study ts along arter ditions analys ht improveme re expected onds of saving peak hour. Ad nerally under ara Road bet ing the PM pe m the similar Road/Camino . 5 rection. The t ver there is v link analysis distribution p ara is increas nes is expec es per hour in ere are no si in traffic is re area. It is als rials in Contra ses for the fo ents at som to experien gs per vehicle dditionally, w r 5% of the se tween Gleaso eak hour. ity in results Tassajara fro travel time is very little dif for roadway attern in the ed from four cted to slight n both northb gnificant diff elatively insig so not expec a Costa Count our‐lane and s e intersectio ce intolerab e during the A while the six‐l egment trave on Drive and of the analy om four to six s consistently fference in LO ys in the stud e study area w r to six lanes. tly increase bound and so ferences in tr gnificant and cted to signif ty and Alame six‐lane scena ons under th le delays at AM peak hou ane scenario el time with t North Ranch ysis for the fo x lanes is not March longer unde OS between t dy area indica when the num . However, w traffic on Ta outhbound dir ravel pattern does not aff icantly impac eda County. arios general he six‐lane sc LOS F, the r, and an inc o shows lowe the exception h Drive which our‐lane and expected to r 19, 2015 er the 4‐ the two ate that mber of widening assajara rections s under fect the ct other ly show cenario. six‐lane rease in er travel n of the h shows six‐lane result in 4.2.e Packet Pg. 139 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Existin Study In Figure 1 s All of the synchroni are opera ramp inte Rd/I‐580 Camino T intersecti Study R Tassajara concrete access lim directions Tassajara of unsigna center‐tu roadway bike lane Tassajara with a low side of the Camino T density of roadway. posted sp Camino T concrete speed lim Camino T raised con limit of 45 a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra ng Roadwa ntersectio shows the stu study interse ized. The Cam ated by Contr ersections are WB off‐ramp assajara/Crow ons are all op Roadway S Road betwee median and mited to only s of travel. Road betwee alized access rn lane that for the majo between Nor Road/Camin w density of e roadway. It Tassajara bet f unsignalized The roadwa peed limit of 4 Tassajara betw median betw it of 45 mph Tassajara from ncrete media 5 mph with ac no Tassajara aft Report ay Setting ons udy area and l ections are sig mino Tassajar ra Costa Cou e operated b p intersection w Canyon Ro perated by th Segments en Gleason D curbs on eit y signalized in en North Dub points. The continues no rity of the se rth Dublin Ra no Tassajara b unsignalized t has a posted tween Winde d access poin y segment h 45 mph. ween Lusitan ween signalize with access li m Crown Can an between s ccess limited g locations of t gnalized and ra/Highland R nty. The El C by Caltrans. T ns are owned ad intersectio e City of Dub Drive and Nor her side of t ntersections a blin Ranch Dri segment has orth until Sh egment. It ha nch Drive and between Fall access point d speed limit o emere Parkw nts. The roadw has striped le no Street and ed intersectio imited to only nyon Road a signalized inte to only signa 6 he 12 study in operating “fr Road and Cam Charro Road/ The Santa Rit d by Caltrans on is operate lin. th Dublin Ran the roadway. along the roa ive and Fallon striped left‐t hadow Hill Dr as a posted s d Shadow Hill on Road and s. The roadw of 45 mph. way and Lusit way segment eft turn lanes d Crow Canyo ons and curbs y signalized in nd Sycamore ersections an lized intersec ntersections. ree”. In other mino Tassajar /I‐580 EB off‐ ta Road/I‐580 but operate ed by the Tow nch Drive is a . It has a pos adway. There n Road is a tw turn lanes at rive and has peed limit of l Drive. d Windemere way segment tano Street i t has no med s at Highland on Road is a s on both side ntersections a e Valley Road nd curbs on e ctions along t r words the t ra/Windemer ‐ramp and Fa 0 EB off‐ram d by the City wn of Danville a four‐lane ro sted speed li e are Class II wo‐lane roadw t major acces a curb on t f 45 mph. Th e Parkway is has no media is a two‐lane dian or curb o d Road and F four‐lane roa es of the road along the roa d is a four‐la either side. It the roadway. March traffic signals e Road inters allon Road/I‐5 p and the Ta y of Pleasant e. The remain oadway with a mit of 45 m bike lanes f way with low ss points as w the east side ere is a nort a two‐lane r an or curb on e roadway w on either side Finley Road. adway with a dway. It has a adway. ane roadway has a posted 19, 2015 are not sections 580 WB assajara on. The ning five a raised ph with for both density well as a e of the hbound oadway n either with low e of the It has a a raised a posted y with a d speed 4.2.e Packet Pg. 140 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 1Figure - Signalized Study Intersection & Number LEGEND 00 Study Area Ca m i n o Tas s a j a r a P: \ P \ 1 4 \ 1 4 1 1 2 - 0 0 1 C i t y o f D u b l i n O n - C a l l T a s s a j a r a R d \ 0 6 G r a p h i c s D o u g h e r t y R d A l c o s t a B l v d Dublin Blvd Gleason DrVil l a g e P k w y Ama d o r V a l l e y B l v d O w e n s D r W Las P o s i t a s B l v d Stoneridge Dr E B r a n c h P k w y Pimlico Dr B l a c k h a w k R d Silve r a Ran c h D r Westminster Pl Tassajara Ranch Dr Tassajara Village Dr Buckingham Pl Parkhaven Dr Jasmine Wy Lawrence Wy Hansen Ln Shadow Creek Dr Knollview Dr Charbray St Lusitano St 12 6 11 5 10 4 3 2 9 8 71 D o u g h e r t y R d Do u g h e r t y R d N. Dublin Ranch Rd Antone Wy S Dublin Ranch Rd Signal Hill Dr Turnberry Dr - Signalized Intersection - Danville/Dublin City Boundary - Contra Costa County Boundary City of Danville City of D u b l i n Contra C o s t a C o u n t y Alamed a C o u n t y C a m i n o Ta s s a j a r a Cami n o Tassaj a r a Windemere P k w y Fa l l o n R d Ta s s a j a r a R d AM (PM) - Segment Peak Hour Volumes 4.2.e Packet Pg. 141 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Analys Study S In order t traffic div Scenario With an a City of Du the study Charro Ro to access Road/Cam Boulevard segment. Scenario With assu roadway t model as lanes from Plan. Model Ad During th more accu adjustme R p A C V C Pa Appendix future sce In additio scenarios a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra sis Method Scenarios o determine ersions, the f o #1 – Four‐l assumed cap ublin in Alame y assesses wh oad/Fallon Ro s Tassajara R mino Tassajar d along Tassa o #2 – Six‐lan umed capacity to access Cam sumes six la m Windemer djustments e model scen urately the ex nts were mad evised the nu lanned roadw dded a centro oded Tassaja alley Road fo oded Tassaja arkway for Sc x C contains a enarios. on, key roadw were revie no Tassajara aft Report dology the potentia following two lane Capacit acity of four eda County to hether traffic oad, Isabel Av Road/Camino ra is modeled ajara Road co ne Capacity y of six lanes mino Tassajar nes from the e Parkway to nario develop xisting and fu de to the netw umber of lane way improvem oid connecto ara Road/Cam r Scenario #1 ara Road/Cam cenario #2. a table and m way improve ewed to en l of traffic im o scenarios ar ty on Tassaj lanes on Tas o Sycamore V c to/from I‐58 venue, Portol Tassajara Ro with four lan onsistent wit on Tassajar on Tassajara ra in Danville e Tassajara R o Tassajara R pment proces uture roadwa work: es along Tassa ments, r from Silvera mino Tassajar 1, and mino Tassajar maps showing ments were nsure that 8 pact on local e analyzed: ara Road/C ssajara Road/ Valley Road in 80 is expecte a Avenue, Co oad via High nes, the upda h the numbe ra Road/Cam Road, there to avoid cong Road/I‐580 in anch Drive a ss the CCTA t ay network co ajara Road, Sa a Ranch Drive ra as a 4‐lan a as a 6‐lane g the number identified an the models roadways in Camino Tass /Camino Tass n the Town of ed to divert t ollier Canyon hland Road. ated CCTA Mo er of existing mino Tassaj is the possib gestion on I‐5 nterchange to ccording to t travel deman onfiguration i anta Rita Roa e to Tassajara ne facility fro e facility from r of travel lan nd the future accurately the Tri‐Valle sajara sajara from G f Danville in C to use local r Road, and No While the m odel has six la g travel lanes jara ility that som 580 and I‐680 o Windemere the Contra Co nd model wa in the project ad and El Cha a Rd, om Gleason D m Gleason Dr nes assumed e model netw reflect the March ey area from p Gleason Drive Contra Costa roadways suc orth Livermo majority of Ta anes south of s along the r me traffic will 0. The update e Parkway a osta County G s adjusted to t area. The fo rro Road to r Drive to Syca rive to Winde for the exist works for th planned r 19, 2015 possible e in the County, ch as El re Road assajara f Dublin oadway use this ed CCTA nd four General o reflect ollowing reflect amore emere ting and e study oadway 4.2.e Packet Pg. 142 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A improvem Costa Cou C Jo Ex H Ex Fa Sa Level o Signalize A Level of the avera represent LOS A is c Valley Tra capacity. Table 3 – S According capacity a during the Highway C a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra ments. Some o unty’s Compre onstruction o oaquin Count xtension of D acienda Drive xtension of D allon Rd/El Ch anta Rita Roa f Service M ed Intersect f Service (LOS age delay p ting free‐flow considered ex ansportation LOS definitio Signalized Inte L Sou Boa g to the City o analysis were e weekday A Capacity Man no Tassajara aft Report of the key pr ehensive Tran of HOV lanes y Dublin Bouleva e widening Dougherty Roa harro Road in ad interchang Methodolo tions S) evaluation er vehicle e w conditions t xcellent, whi Plan/Action ns, considerin rsection LOS T Level of Service A A B C D E F urce: 2000 High ard, 2000. of Dublin, Mo e conducted M peak hour nual (HCM) op ojects that ar nsportation P s on I‐580 fr ard from Fallo ad nterchange im e improveme ogies and P is a qualitat experienced to “F” repres le LOS E is co Plan; and L ng vehicle de Thresholds and Average Cont (seconds/v ≤ 10 > 10 and ≤ 2 > 20 and ≤ 3 > 35 and ≤ 5 > 55 and ≤ 8 > 80 hway Capacity oller Ranch Tr on April 19, (7:00 to 9:00 perations me 9 re included in Project List ar rom Tassajara on Road to Ai mprovements ents Parameter ive descriptio during peak senting conge onsidered sat LOS F repres lay for signali d Definitions trol Delay vehicle) F In 0 S M 5 S A 5 A T 0 U S F E y Manual, Tran raffic Impact 2012. Inters 0 AM) and PM thodology an n the model n re: a Road to V irway Boulev rs on of an inte k travel peri ested conditi tisfactory op sents unacce ized intersect Descr Free flow/ nsignificant De Stable Operatio Minimal Delay Stable Operatio Acceptable Del Approaching U Tolerable Delay Unstable Opera Significant Dela Forced Flow/ Excessive Delay nsportation Re Study interse sections were M peak hour nd Synchro 8. networks acc Vasco Road a ard rsection’s pe iods. LOS ca ions with lon erating cond eptable cond tions, are sho ription elay on/ on/ ay nstable/ y ation/ ay y esearch ection vehicle e evaluated f (4:00 to 6:00 0 software. March ording to the nd further to rformance ba an range fro ng delays. Ge itions under ditions, at or own in Table 3 e counts used for traffic con 0 PM) using th 19, 2015 e Contra o San ased on om “A” enerally, the Tri‐ r above 3. d for the nditions he 2000 4.2.e Packet Pg. 143 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A For signal intersecti the inters intersecti Roadway Measures performa used to c reflects th including congested while LOS Plan; and vehicle tr As there calculated delay for Table 4 – R The above done by c 2 According Transporta Capacity M a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra ized intersect on. The LOS section. A com on. y Segments s of effective nce measure characterize v he factors tha control dela d conditions S E is consider LOS F repre avel speeds a is no coord d as the sum study interse Roadway Segm Level Servic A B C D E F Source: 20 e MOEs for e comparing the g to the 2013 C ation/Action Pl Manual for ana no Tassajara aft Report tions, this me is then based mbined avera ness (MOE) es as signal d vehicular LOS at influence r y. LOS can r with long de red satisfacto esents unacce as a percenta ination betw of free flow ctions within ment LOS Thres of ce Tr Perce 010 Highway C xisting condit e results of th CCTA Technica lan for Routes lyses of impact ethodology de d on average age delay, we for roadway elay, travel t S for a given unning time a range from “ elays and ext ory operating eptable cond age of free flo ween signals travel time a each study s sholds and De ravel Speed a entage of Fre Speed >85 > 67 and ≤ 8 > 50 and ≤ 6 > 40 and ≤ 5 > 30 and ≤ 4 > 30 Capacity Manu tions provide he each propo l Procedures (p of Regional Sig ts of developm 10 etermines the e delay (in se eighted by ap segments re ime, and ave direction of along each lin A” represent ensive queui conditions un ditions, at or ow speed, are along the st long each stu segment. finitions as a ee Flow 5 7 0 0 ual2 e a basis for e osed scenario p.26) and spec gnificance, “an ment or benefit e capacity of conds per ve pproach volum eported in th erage speeds travel along nk and the de ting free‐flow ing. Generally nder the Tri‐V above capac e shown in Ta tudy roadwa udy segment Desc Primarily Free Reasonably un operation Stable Operati Less stable op Unstable Oper Significant Del Extremely low Extensive que evaluating the o. cified in the 20 nalysts are enco ts from transpo each lane gro ehicle) for the me, and LOS his analysis in . Through ve a roadway s elay incurred w conditions y, LOS A is c Valley Transp city. LOS def able 4 and m y segments, and the aver ription flow operatio nimpeded ion eration ration/ lay w speed/ uing e proposed sc 14 Tri‐Valley ouraged to use ortation impro March oup approach e movements is presented nclude such c ehicle travel s segment. Thi by through v to “F” repre onsidered ex portation Plan finitions, cons meet CCTA sta travel time rage through n cenarios. This e the 2010 Hig ovements”. 19, 2015 hing the s within for the corridor speed is s speed vehicles, esenting xcellent, n/Action sidering andards. will be ‐vehicle s will be hway 4.2.e Packet Pg. 144 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A CCTA T To estima version of also make interim d 5‐year in environm that set h land use analysis. I the result Different horizon y years bet Projection land use s The curre • A • A • P • P • O For this ef • 20 • 20 For each procedure Roadwa The volum general, o Instead, c produced illustrated Horizon a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra Travel Dem ate the future f the CCTA tra es use of 201 raft land use ncrements. I ental review as not been r distributions In general, th ts of this analy highway net years. The cu tween 2000 a n, the model set for the sce nt countywid M Peak hour M Peak perio M peak hour, M Peak perio Off‐Peak perio ffort, the follo 013 (represen 040 (represen scenario, th es are further ay Segmen me forecasts outputs from changes in for by the trav d in the follow Year Volume no Tassajara aft Report mand Mode e year traffic avel demand 0 count data Projections 2 t should be is currently reviewed and and therefo he land use e ysis more con works are av rrent version and 2040. Fo interpolates enario year. de travel dem , od (6‐10 AM), , od (3‐7 PM), a od, covering a owing model nting the “exi nting Scenario he AM peak r described in nt Volume for the stud m the travel recast deman vel demand wing equation es = Existing ( el demand inpu model was u . The land us 2011 (Curren e noted tha underway an d approved by ore not appro stimates in P nservative co vailable in the n of the trave or scenario ye the land use and model in and ll remaining h datasets wer isting year” m os 1 and 2 in k hour and n the followin e Forecast y segments w demand mo nd volumes b model, were n: (Observed) V Mo 11 uts for the tra used. This mo e and socio‐d nt Regional Pl at the Cont nd will be bas y the local jur opriate for th Projections 20 mpared to re e model to r el demand m ears that are e between th ncludes the fo hours. re used: model scenari horizon year PM peak ho g sections. Methodol were develop odel were no etween the e e added to Volumes + (Ho odel Forecast affic operatio odel set is cali demographics lans) which c tra Costa C sed on ABAG risdictions, it he Tassajara 011 are highe esults based o represent net model can ge e not directly he nearest tw ollowing analy io), 2040). our assignme logy ped using the ot used direc existing year a observed tr orizon Year M t) onal analysis, ibrated to 200 s information over years 20 ountywide T G’s Projection includes an a Road/Camin er than Proje on Projections twork improv enerate scena y included in wo years in o ysis periods: ents were u e CCTA trave ctly in the o and each futu affic volume Model Forecas March the latest ap 00 traffic cou n is based on 010 through Transportatio s 2013, but b approximatio o Tassajara c ections 2013, s 2013. vements at d ario networks the ABAG la order to deve tilized. The el demand m operational a ure scenario es. This appr st – “Existing 19, 2015 pproved unts and ABAG’s 2040 in on Plan because n of the capacity making different s for all and use elop the specific odel. In analysis. year, as roach is g Year” 4.2.e Packet Pg. 145 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A For new f used dire adjustme The 2013 used to fo growth w existing p volumes f The appro approach Interse For the i procedure then appl Following intersecti This proce • G • C • A ex • A CCTA T As the lar demand m model by travel dem area, incl Parkway, Road, El C The CCTA model vo compariso similar re being slig models a facilities b a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra facilities and ectly for inp nts described model datas orecast grow will be determ peak hour vol for both exist oach describ and departu ection Volu ntersection a es described ying the Furn g this proced ons. ess may be su enerate 2013 ompute the m pply Furness xisting turn m pply manual Travel Dem rgest part of model for the y comparing i mand model. uding but no Fallon Road Charro Road a A travel dema olumes, as th on showed th sults with re ghtly more co long Tassajar being coded d no Tassajara aft Report movements t put to the o d below. set was used wth for the fu mined using th ume for each ing and futur ed above wa re links for th ume Forec analysis, an above to det ness methodo dure, manua ummarized as 3 and 2040 m model growth methodolog movement de adjustments mand Mode the study co e roadway ca t with a) the . The compar ot limited to , Gleason Dr and Stoneridg and model vo he City of D hat the two m spect to the onservative. ra Road and differently in that do not e operational d for the “exi uture traffic c he respective h link. Appen re year scenar as used to de he study inter cast Metho expanded ap termine appr ology to dete al adjustmen s follows: model forecast h for each link gy to comput mands and fo to balance de el Review rridor is in Co apacity analy e City of Dub rison mostly the following rive, Central ge Drive. olumes were Dublin and th models (both trip allocatio There were Fallon Road, the two mod 12 exist today, t analysis, sub isting year” m conditions. Fo peak hour m dix D contain rios. evelop foreca rsections. odology pproach was oach‐link and ermine individ ts were ma ts for each int k (2040 mode e individual t orecast appro emands betw ontra Costa C ysis. However lin travel dem focused in th g facilities: Ta Parkway, Du e compared w he Tri‐Valley based on lan on in the stud certain signi , but that di dels; the two he horizon‐ye bject to the model foreca or AM and P models. This g ns maps of th asts for the a used. This d departure‐l dual turning de to balan tersection ap el output min turning move oach and dep ween adjacent County, it wa r, DKS took a mand model he estimated assajara Roa ublin Bouleva with the Alam y are incorpo d use forecas dy area, with ificant volum d not raise c models have ear model fo reasonablen ast. The 2040 PM analysis p growth volum he study area arterial segm approach inv ink growth fo movements a nce demands pproach and d nus 2010 mod ement dema arture link gr t intersection s decided to a first step in and b) the A peak hour v d/Camino Ta ard, Dougher meda county orated in Ala sts of Project the volumes me difference concerns as e different ass March orecast outpu ness and ba 0 model data periods, the f me was added a showing mo ments, as wel volved apply or each inter at each inter s between a departure link del output); nd forecasts rowth; and ns. use the CCTA n assessing th Alameda coun volumes in th assajara, Win rty Road, San wide travel d ameda Coun ions 2011) pr s in the CCTA es between t it was due t sumptions ab 19, 2015 uts were alancing set was forecast d to the odel link l as the ying the section, section. adjacent k; using A travel he CCTA ntywide he study demere nta Rita demand nty. The roduced A model the two o those bout the 4.2.e Packet Pg. 146 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A number o case. Having co the Alam segment analysis. T produced “gateway Signific Contra C The Tri‐Va such as in is an acce area rega evaluated 50 or mor The stan Plan/Actio At the int LOS stand intersecti threshold Project. City of D An impac project w significant previously that the C already op uses HCM with the H a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra of lanes of the ompared the eda countyw is located in The model s more conse capacity con cant Impac Costa County alley Transpo ntersections a ptable level o ardless of ho d under CCTA re project trip dard set for on Plan is LOS tersections of dard is LOS C ons are regar as outlined ublin t would be s ould exceed a t if a new inte y identified in City strive fo perating belo M 2000 metho HCM 2000 me no Tassajara aft Report e two facilitie CCTA travel d wide model, a Contra Costa cenarios wer rvative traffic straints”. ct Criteria y and Tri‐Va ortation Coun along Camino of traffic oper ow the inter A requiremen ps in a peak p rth for Rout S E. All study f Camino Tas based on the rded as a sem in the Count ignificant if a acceptable le ersection is id n the Eastern or LOS D at in ow an accepta od for interse ethod es, and that re demand mod as well as tak a County, it w re developed c volumes in alley Transp cil set maxim Tassajara. Ac ration at inte rsections are ts include sig eriod when u tes of Regio intersections ssajara/Highla e standard se mi‐rural inter ty’s comment an intersectio evels with the dentified as e Dublin EIR a ntersections. able threshold ection LOS ca 13 esulted in the del volumes w king into acc was decided t using the “u the study are portation Co mum levels of ccording to th rsections on t e currently o gnalized inter used to assess onal Significa s are on Route and Road and et forth in in section and t ts in the Add on operating e addition of p xceeding acce as a study inte An impact w d and the pro lculations. Th ese facilities a with those fro count the fac to use the CC unconstraine ea compared ouncil f congestion f he CCTA requ the routes of operating. Fu rsections tha s the potentia ance in the es of Regiona d Camino Tas the Contra C therefore hav dendum to th at an accept project traffic eptable level ersection. Th would also b oject worsens he remaining attracting trip om the City o ct that the m CTA travel dem ed” version o to the versio for routes of uirements, lev f regional sign urthermore, t are expecte al impact of n 2014 Tri‐Va al Significance ssajara/Wind Costa County ve a more str he Proposed table level of c. In addition, s and if such e General Pla e significant s the conditio intersections March ps differently of Dublin mo majority of th mand model of the model on that incorp regional sign vel of service nificance in th intersections ed to be affe new developm alley Transpo e. emere Parkw General Plan ringent perfo Creekside Ce f service with , an impact w intersection w an standard r if an interse on. The City of s were also a 19, 2015 in each odel and e study for this as that porated ificance E (LOS) he study s to be ected by ment. ortation way, the n. These ormance emetery hout the would be was not requires ection is f Dublin nalyzed 4.2.e Packet Pg. 147 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Town of The Tri‐V Regional S are: • D m • Sy • C Intersecti Capacity intersecti Caltrans Caltrans e highway f that the l highway f maintaine Existin Existing The lane Condition condition 3 Town of D a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra Danville3 Valley Council Significance i anville Boule missing segme ycamore Valle row Canyon R ons on the f Manual (HCM on of Crow C endeavors to facilities, how ead agency c facility is ope ed. ng Conditi g Traffic V configuration ns traffic volu s. Danville Gener no Tassajara aft Report l has establis nclude two co vard/San Ram ent through D ey Road and Road (south o first two of t M) Operation anyon Road a o maintain a wever, Caltran consult with erating at less ions Volumes an ns for each o umes are pre ral Plan, Chapt shed LOS sta orridors with mon Valley Bo Downtown Da Camino Tassa of Camino Tas these corrido nal Method. and Camino T target LOS a ns acknowled Caltrans to d s (worse) tha nd Lane Co of the study sented in Fig er 4, 2013 14 andards for “ in Danville an oulevard sout anville in the c ajara (a single ssajara) ors are subje The Town o Tassajara. at the transit dges that this determine th n the approp onfigurati intersections gure 3. Figure “Routes of R nd one corrid th of Sycamo center) e corridor com ect to an LOS of Danville h tion between may not alw e appropriat priate target ions s are presen e 4 shows lin Regional Sign dor on the edg ore Valley (a s mprised of tw S E standard as a standar n LOS “C” an ways be feasib e target LOS LOS, the exis ted in Figure nk volumes u March ificance.” Ro ge of Danville single corrido wo roads) d using the H rd of LOS D nd LOS “D” o ble and recom . If an existin sting MOE sh e 2 and the under existing 19, 2015 outes of e. These or with a Highway for the on State mmends ng State ould be Existing g traffic 4.2.e Packet Pg. 148 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Figure 2 Existing Lane Configuration Traffic Signal Stop Sign A A CDE LEGEND JJ L N A CD P A C JJ N A A C JL L N N 9. Fallon Rd & Dublin Blvd 10. Fallon Rd & Sivera Ranch Dr 11. Camino Tassajara & Windemere Pkwy 12. Camino Tassajara & Crow Canyon Rd DE A D A A A C D JLL N JL KL JLL N N JL N A CE D JJ N N CDE 5. Tassajara Rd & Fallon Rd 6. Camino Tassajara & Highland Rd 7. El Charro Rd & I‐580 EB ramps 8. El Charro Rd & I‐580 WB ramps A A CCE A C E O A B E E JL N L N JKL JLL JL N N CCCE CCE JJ L L N N A A A CCE JL N N A A D JLL N 1. Santa Rita Rd & I‐580 EB ramps 2. Santa Rita Rd & I‐580 WB ramps 3. Tassajara Rd & Dublin Blvd 4. Tassajara Rd & Gleason Dr A A E E A A E E A A A C D JLL N JJLLL JJLLLL N N P:\P\14\14112‐001 City of Dublin On‐Call Tassajara Rd\06 Graphics\Camino Tassajara Volume Figures v2 4.2.e Packet Pg. 149 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) RT RT TH LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT RT TH LT TH RT RT TH RT TH LT LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT TH RT TH LT LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT RT RT TH TH RT TH LT LT TH LT LT RT TH RT TH LT LT LT TH RT TH RT LT TH RT TH RT TH RT RT RT RT TH TH RT TH LT RT TH RT TH RT TH LT LT LT LT TH RT LT LT TH LT LT TH LT LT TH RT TH TH RT RT RT RT Traffic Signal AM(PM) 25 8 (3 0 7 ) 0 (0 ) 18 1 (1 8 9 ) 40 8 (4 0 2 ) 15 (4 6 ) 36 4 (5 1 6 ) 75 (3 3 ) 21 (1 5 8 ) 71 (128) 282 (1017) 19 3 (1 8 3 ) 99 (184) 12. Camino Tassajara & Crow Canyon Rd 78 (7 2 ) 28 (13) 434 (438) 252 (172) 74 (3 2 ) 82 (2 1 4 ) 192 (514)182 (182) 5 (1) 21 (6 ) 42 (1 2 7 ) 88 (1 ) 21 (18)71 (19) 17 0 (4 1 5 ) 2 (4 7 ) 2 (3) 97 (5)58 (22) 0 (1) 264 (43)198 (314) 3 (3)2 (6)27 0 (4 2 5 ) 59 (1 5 7 ) 34 7 (1 9 6 ) 27 4 (5 7 1 ) 5. Tassajara Rd & Fallon Rd 6. Camino Tassajara & Highland Rd 7. El Charro Rd & I‐580 EB ramps 8. El Charro Rd & I‐580 WB ramps 68 1 (2 3 5 ) 12 0 (7 9 ) 0 (1 ) 44 3 (2 0 8 ) 53 (2 1 5 ) 86 (1 9 1 ) 41 6 (7 0 3 ) 17 2 (1 9 1 ) 665 (338) 181 (477) 33 (66) 10 0 9 (1 4 3 3 ) 55 3 (6 7 7 ) 63 (551) 32 9 (4 0 2 ) 55 3 (7 1 4 ) 11 7 (3 9 4 ) 114 (192) 48 (213) 23 0 (7 1 ) 92 0 (4 6 6 ) 59 (2 3 ) 252 (151) 374 (479) 315 (298) 15 (34) 51 (22) 191 (147) 155 (67) 77 9 (1 2 8 8 ) 39 8 (5 3 7 ) 1. Santa Rita Rd & I‐580 EB ramps 2. Santa Rita Rd & I‐580 WB ramps 3. Tassajara Rd & Dublin Blvd 4. Tassajara Rd & Gleason Dr 22 8 (2 9 8 ) 10 1 3 (1 0 2 1 ) 17 5 (2 8 8 ) 84 4 (6 4 7 ) 86 6 (1 1 0 4 ) 163 (179) 544 (509) 384 (233) 538 (434) 59 (306) 147 (226) 17 0 (9 9 ) 10 9 4 (6 5 4 ) 16 (5 5 ) 14 8 (4 2 8 ) 287 (124) 10. Fallon Rd & Sivera Ranch Dr 3 (1 9 ) 13 8 (7 8 ) 1 (5) 11 (9 ) 65 (1 2 8 ) 29 (10) 11. Camino Tassajara & Windemere Pkwy 62 (3 5 ) 50 1 (1 8 8 ) Volume Turning Movements Figure 3 LEGEND 87 (329) 9. Fallon Rd & Dublin Blvd 29 (2 0 ) 51 2 (3 6 0 ) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (1) 18 (88) Existing Condition Turn Movement Volumes 20 (30) 0 (1) 56 (7 9 ) 12 4 (4 6 8 ) P:\P\14\14112‐001 City of Dublin On‐Call Tassajara Rd\06 Graphics\Camino Tassajara Volume Figures v2 4.2.e Packet Pg. 150 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 4Figure - Signalized Study Intersection & Number LEGEND 00 Existing Condition Link Volumes P: \ P \ 1 4 \ 1 4 1 1 2 - 0 0 1 C i t y o f D u b l i n O n - C a l l T a s s a j a r a R d \ 0 6 G r a p h i c s - Signalized Intersection - Danville City Boundary - Dublin City Boundary - Contra Costa County BoundaryAM (PM) - Segment Peak Hour Voumes 4.2.e Packet Pg. 151 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Interse Table 5 su and PM p Table 5 – E No 1 Sa I‐5 2 Sa Rd 3 Ta 4 Ta 5 Fa Ta 6 Ca Hig 7 El I‐5 8 El 58 9 Fa 10 Fa Sil 11 Ca W 12 Ca Cr Source: Notes: a. Delay b. LOS = BOLD in Appendix Condition standards acceptabl standard at LOS C d during the E under th at LOS C during the standard. a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra ection Peak ummarizes th eak hours. Existing Condit Intersection nta Rita Rd/ 580 EB off‐ram nta Rita Rd/Ta d/I‐580 WB off‐ ssajara Rd/Du ssajara Rd/Gle llon Rd/Camin ssajara/Tassaj amino Tassajar ghland Rd Charro Rd/ 580 EB off‐ram Charro Rd/Fall 80 WB ramps llon Rd/Dublin llon Rd/ vera Ranch Dr amino Tassajar indemere Pkw amino Tassajar ow Canyon Rd : DKS Associate y is in seconds = Level of Serv ndicates unacc x A contains t ns, nine of th s during AM y at LOS D du during the AM during the AM e PM peak ho he Contra Co during the P e AM peak h no Tassajara aft Report k Hour Lev he results of t tions Intersect Name p assajara ‐ramp blin Blvd eason Dr o ara Rd a/ p lon Rd/I‐ n Blvd a/ wy a and es, 2014 per vehicle an ice ceptable LOS the LOS analy e 12 study in and PM pea uring the PM M peak hour. M peak hour our. The Cam sta County G PM peak hou our operates vel of Serv the intersect tion Level of Se Control Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized nd is based on a ysis and calcu ntersections k hours. The peak hour bu . The Tassajar but operates ino Tassajara eneral Plan st ur. Only the s worse than 18 vice Analy ion LOS analy ervice AM peak ho Average Delaya LO 55.9 10.3 35.8 27.8 16.0 65.8 4.0 6.0 11.2 5.6 21.6 24.3 average stoppe lation worksh currently ope Santa Rita R ut operates u ra Road/Dubl s unacceptab a/Highland Ro tandard durin intersection the 2014 Tri‐ ysis (Existi ysis conducte our PM p OSb Averag Delaya E 38.1 B 12.1 D 57.8 C 36.5 D 46.4 E 24.1 A 7.5 A 8.4 B 18.3 A 4.9 C 23.5 C 39.3 ed delay. heets. Based erate accepta Road/I‐580 EB unacceptably in Boulevard bly at LOS E u oad intersecti ng the AM pe of Fallon Rd ‐Valley Trans ing Condit ed for the Exi peak hour ge a LOSb D B E D D C A A B A C D on the LOS r ably accordin B off‐ramp in at LOS E und intersection under the City ion operates eak hour and d/Camino Tas portation Pla March tions) isting Conditi esults under ng to applica ntersection o der the City of operates acc y of Dublin st unacceptably operates acc ssajara/Tassa an/Action Pla 19, 2015 ons AM Existing ble LOS operates f Dublin ceptably tandard y at LOS ceptably ajara Rd n LOS E 4.2.e Packet Pg. 152 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Roadwa Table 6 condition for throu determine factors us median, a speeds as LOS analy As shown both direc Table 6 – E Tassajara R North Dub Tassajara R Ranch Dr a Tassajara R between F Parkway Camino Ta parkway a Camino Ta Street and Camino Ta Canyon Ro Road Notes: Fr Trave a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra ay Peak H summarizes s. Average tra ugh traffic at ed using free sed to calcul access point d s a percentag ysis and calcu n in Table 6, a ctions. Gener Existing Condit Roadway Segm Rd between Gl lin Ranch Dr Rd between No and Fallon Road Rd/Camino Tas Fallon Rd and W ssajara betwee nd Lusitano St ssajara betwee Crow Canyon ssajara betwee oad and Sycam ree flow Speed is el Time (sec) = T no Tassajara aft Report our Level the average avel time was t study inter ‐flow speeds late free flow density and n ge of free flow lation worksh all roadway s rally, speeds a tion Roadway ment eason Dr and orth Dublin d ssajara Windemere en Windemere reet en Lusitano Rd en Crow ore Valley s defined by HCM he average time of Service travel time s calculated a rsections wit calculated fr w speed incl number of lan w speed as d heets. segments ope are faster dur Segment Leve Approach Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound e Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound M 2010 method e taken for a veh 19 e Analysis e and roadw as the sum of hin each roa rom the 2010 ude posted s nes. Roadway efined in Tab erate at LOS ring the AM p el of Service Peak Hour d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM ology hicle to travel the (Existing way segment free‐flow tra adway segm 0 Highway Ca speed limit, y Segment LO ble 4. Appen C or better d peak hour. r Average T e segment. Condition level of ser avel time and ent. Free flo pacity Manua existence an OS is determin dix B provide during AM an Travel Time (se 69.6 82.6 63.2 79.7 86.2 86.2 95.2 111.0 98.5 109.8 87.8 88.6 329.2 325.4 325.4 325.8 213.9 213.9 237.6 244.4 278.8 301.6 250.8 250.8 March ns) rvice under average sign ow travel tim al methodolo nd type of cu ned by vehicl es roadway s nd PM peak h ec) Segme C C B C A A A B A B A A A A A A A A A A A B A A 19, 2015 existing al delay me was ogy. The urb and e travel segment hours in ent LOS C C B C A A A B A B A A A A A A A A A A A B A A 4.2.e Packet Pg. 153 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Future 2040 La According significant Livermore CCTA Cou 2040 Se Select‐link peak‐hou Tassajara/ Tassajara Turnberry Road for b Appendix Tassajara the level summariz when the However, on Tassaj southbou significant Figure 5 a traffic con a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra e Cumulat and Use D g to the volu t new develo e and Pleasan untywide Mod elect‐Link k analyses we r traffic cond /Tassajara Ro Road betwee y Drive. Table both scenario x E contains p Road/Camin of traffic dis zed in Table 6 e number of t widening th jara Road/Ca nd directions t differences and Figure 6 s nditions. no Tassajara aft Report tive (2040 escription ume forecast opment and g nton. Growth del, which is d k Analysis ere conducte itions to dete oad. The links en Fallon Roa e 7 shows av os and peak h plots of the se o Tassajara in stribution alo 6, there is no travel lanes o e study road amino Tassaj s during the A in travel patt show link vol 0) Conditi n s for year 20 growth in all h in trip gene described mo d for both Sc ermine the tra s selected for ad and Winde verage flows hours. elect‐link ana n the study a ng the vario significant dif on Tassajara R way from fou jara by less AM and PM p terns under b umes for the 20 ions 040, as I‐580 of the Bay A eration was b ore in detail u cenario 1 and avel patterns the analysis emere Parkwa along severa lysis with traf rea. The thick us routes in fference in th Road/Camino ur lanes to si than 100 v eak hours. Th both four lane 4‐lane and 6 0 gets more Area, traffic d based on land nder the Ana d Scenario 2 u s of vehicles u are Camino T ay, and Fallon l segments a ffic volumes kness of the v the study ar he traffic dist o Tassajara is ix lanes is ex vehicles per herefore it ca es and six lane 6‐lane scenari congested in diverts to loc d use project alysis Method under the AM using various Tassajara nort n Road betwe along Camino along various various links rea. As show ribution patte increased fro pected to slig hour in bot an be conclud es scenario. ios respective March n the future cal streets in tions included dology section M peak hour segments of th of Highlan een Antone W o Tassajara/Ta s roadways in graphically in n in the figu ern in the stu om four to si ghtly increase th northbou ded that there ely under cum 19, 2015 due to Dublin, d in the n. and PM Camino d Road, Way and assajara ncluding ndicates res and udy area ix lanes. e traffic nd and e are no mulative 4.2.e Packet Pg. 154 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Table 7 – 2 Tassajara and North Tassajara Ranch Dr Tassajara between Parkway Camino T Windeme Street Camino T Street and Camino T Canyon R Road a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra 2040 Select‐Lin Roadway Segm Rd between G h Dublin Ranch Rd between N and Fallon Roa Rd/Camino Ta Fallon Rd and Tassajara betwe ere parkway an Tassajara betwe d Crow Canyon Tassajara betwe Road and Sycam no Tassajara aft Report nk Analysis Vo ment Gleason Dr h Dr North Dublin ad assajara Windemere een nd Lusitano een Lusitano n Rd een Crow more Valley lumes Approach Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound 21 Peak Hour d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM d AM PM r Scenario Average Volume 422 75 75 272 500 150 175 300 670 320 603 495 670 200 400 475 300 150 600 200 20 30 350 40 1 e e Scenario Averag Volum 490 75 72 332 550 150 150 390 750 315 660 550 735 200 400 530 400 150 600 200 30 30 350 50 March o 2 ge me 19, 2015 4.2.e Packet Pg. 155 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 5Figure - Signalized Study Intersection & Number LEGEND 00 4-Lane Cumulative 2040 Condition Link VolumesP: \ P \ 1 4 \ 1 4 1 1 2 - 0 0 1 C i t y o f D u b l i n O n - C a l l T a s s a j a r a R d \ 0 6 G r a p h i c s - Signalized Intersection - Danville City Boundary - Dublin City Boundary - Contra Costa County BoundaryAM (PM) - Segment Peak Hour Volumes 4.2.e Packet Pg. 156 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 6Figure - Signalized Study Intersection & Number LEGEND 00 6-Lane Cumulative 2040 Condition Link VolumesP: \ P \ 1 4 \ 1 4 1 1 2 - 0 0 1 C i t y o f D u b l i n O n - C a l l T a s s a j a r a R d \ 0 6 G r a p h i c s - Signalized Intersection - Danville City Boundary - Dublin City Boundary - Contra Costa County BoundaryAM (PM) - Segment Peak Hour Volumes 4.2.e Packet Pg. 157 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Interse Conditi Table 8 c during the Table 8 – C No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sourc Notes a. De b. LOS BOLD During th following condition Sa Ta The inters worse tha a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra ection Peak ions) compares the e AM peak ho Cumulative 204 Intersecti Santa Rita Rd EB off‐ramp Santa Rita Rd Rd and I‐580 ramp Tassajara Rd Blvd Tassajara Rd Gleason Dr Fallon Rd/Ca Tassajara an Rd Camino Tass Highland Rd El Charro Rd EB off‐ramp El Charro Rd/ and I‐580 W Fallon Rd/Du Fallon Rd/Sil Dr Camino Tass Windemere Camino Tass Crow Canyon ce: DKS Associa s: lay is in second S = Level of Se D indicates una he AM Peak two interse s: anta Rita Rd a assajara Road sections of Ta an the 2014 no Tassajara aft Report k Hour Lev e results of th our between 40 Conditions ion Name d and I‐580 d/Tassajara 0 WB off‐ and Dublin and amino d Tassajara ajara and and I‐580 /Fallon Rd B ramps ublin Blvd vera Ranch ajara and Pkwy ajara and n Rd ates, 2014 ds per vehicle a rvice cceptable LOS hour, the in ections are and I‐580 EB o d and Gleason assajara Road Tri‐Valley Tr vel of Serv he intersectio the 4‐lane an Intersection L Control Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized and is based on ntersection L expected to off‐ramp (und n Drive (unde d and Gleaso ransportation 24 vice Analy on LOS analy nd 6‐lane scen Level of Service W 4‐Lane Scen Average Delaya 94.5 29.4 40.4 87.8 18.6 11.5 6.3 6.1 33.4 6.0 28.2 25.7 n average stop OS is genera o operate u der both 4‐la er both 4‐lane n Drive and S n Plan/Action ysis (Cumu ysis conducte narios. e – AM Peak H With Optimizat nario 6‐L LOSb Aver Del F 95 C 29 D 39 F 80 B 16 B 9. A 6. A 9. C 33 A 5. C 27 C 26 pped delay. ally similar b nacceptably ne and 6‐lane e and 6‐lane s Santa Rita Rd n Plan LOS E ulative 204 ed for the Cu Hour ion Lane Scenario rage aya LOSb 5.8 F 9.2 C 9.5 D 0.1 F 6.9 B .0 A .3 A .7 A 3.4 C .9 A 7.4 C 6.0 C between the under cumu e scenarios) scenarios) d and I‐580 E standard un March 40 umulative Con Applicable LOS Standard D D D D D C D D D D C D two scenari ulative 2040 B off‐ramp o nder both sce 19, 2015 nditions e os. The 0 traffic operates enarios. 4.2.e Packet Pg. 158 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Table 9 c during the Table 9 – C No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sourc Notes a. De b. LOS BOLD During th following condition Ta Ta Fa a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra compares the e PM peak ho Cumulative 204 Intersecti Santa Rita Rd EB off‐ramp Santa Rita Rd Rd and I‐580 ramp Tassajara Rd Blvd Tassajara Rd Gleason Dr Fallon Rd/Ca Tassajara an Rd Camino Tass Highland Rd El Charro Rd EB off‐ramp El Charro Rd/ and I‐580 W Fallon Rd/Du Fallon Rd/Sil Dr Camino Tass Windemere Camino Tass Crow Canyon ce: DKS Associa s: lay is in second S = Level of Se D indicates una he PM Peak three inter s: assajara Road assajara Road allon Road an no Tassajara aft Report e results of th our between t 40 Conditions ion Name d and I‐580 d/Tassajara 0 WB off‐ and Dublin and amino d Tassajara ajara and and I‐580 /Fallon Rd B ramps ublin Blvd vera Ranch ajara and Pkwy ajara and n Rd ates, 2014 ds per vehicle a rvice cceptable LOS hour, the in sections are d and Dublin d and Gleason nd Dublin Bou he intersectio the 4‐Lane an Intersection L Control Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized Signalized and is based on ntersection LO expected t Boulevard (un n Drive (unde ulevard (unde 25 on LOS analy nd 6‐Lane sce Level of Service W 4‐Lane Scen Average Delaya 39.2 12.9 91.2 65.4 16.8 11.6 11.4 7.4 132.7 6.1 20.9 44.2 n average stop OS is genera o operate u nder both 4‐l er both 4‐lane er both 4‐lane ysis conducte enarios. e – PM Peak H With Optimizat nario 6‐L LOSb Aver Del D 47 B 17 F 133 E 87 B 17 B 12 B 11 A 4. F 174 A 6. C 20 D 42 pped delay. ally similar b unacceptably ane and 6‐lan e and 6‐lane s e and 6‐lane s ed for the Cu Hour ion Lane Scenario rage aya LOSb 7.7 C 7.8 B 3.5 F 7.9 F 7.1 B 2.3 B 1.3 B .4 A 4.9 F .1 A 0.6 C 2.5 D between the under cum ne scenarios) scenarios) scenarios) March umulative Con Applicable LOS Standard D D D D D C D D D D C D two scenari ulative 2040 19, 2015 nditions e os. The 0 traffic 4.2.e Packet Pg. 159 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A The inters Road and standard Figure 5 a under cum on the LO at LOS E o a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra sections of T Dublin Boule under both s and Figure 6 s mulative 2040 OS results und or better duri no Tassajara aft Report assajara Road evard operate cenarios. show the fore 0 traffic cond der Cumulativ ng both the A d and Dublin e worse than ecasted traffi ditions. Appen ve Conditions AM and PM p 26 Boulevard, T the 2014 Tri ic volumes fo ndix A provid s, nine of the eak hours for Tassajara Roa i‐Valley Trans or the 4‐lane des LOS analy e twelve stud r both the 4‐L ad and Gleas sportation Pla and 6‐lane sc ysis and calcu dy intersectio Lane and 6‐La March on Drive, and an/Action Pla cenarios resp ulation sheets ns currently o ane scenarios 19, 2015 d Fallon an LOS E pectively s. Based operate s. 4.2.e Packet Pg. 160 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) RT RT TH LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT RT TH LT TH RT RT TH RT TH LT LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT TH RT TH LT LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT RT RT TH TH RT TH LT LT TH LT LT RT TH RT TH LT LT LT TH RT TH RT LT TH RT TH RT TH RT RT RT RT TH TH RT TH LT RT TH RT TH RT TH LT LT LT LT TH RT LT LT TH LT LT TH LT LT TH RT TH TH RT RT RT RT Traffic Signal AM(PM) LEGEND Figure 7 Volume Turning Movements 4‐Lane Cumulative Condition Turn Movement Volumes 353 (1264) 15 3 (1 2 0 ) 60 9 (6 8 5 ) 21 3 (5 2 2 ) 36 (94) 4 (9)24 (103)87 (189) 568 (2486) 56 (0 ) 24 1 (1 7 1 5 ) 26 7 (0 ) 44 (6 1 ) 149 (0) 102 (72) 400 (315) 49 (79) 59 5 (5 9 5 ) 57 0 (3 6 6 ) 22 1 (5 8 1 ) 762 (1099)298 (109) 884 (0)82 (28) 954 (0)599 (472)39 0 (4 7 ) 76 9 (1 4 7 ) 11 4 (1 6 6 ) 50 9 (5 4 7 ) 47 (1 8 0 ) 9. Fallon Rd & Dublin Blvd 10. Fallon Rd & Sivera Ranch Dr 11. Camino Tassajara & Windemere Pkwy 12. Camino Tassajara & Crow Canyon Rd 73 (6 9 4 ) 10 2 8 (1 9 8 ) 7 (4 4 ) 65 9 (4 8 1 ) 57 8 (1 7 5 4 ) 74 (3 4 ) 97 (182)206 (798) 23 2 (6 7 4 ) 12 (5 9 ) 27 7 (1 6 6 3 ) 63 6 (9 4 9 ) 455 (854)429 (264) 1 (1) 14 4 (5 8 ) 46 8 (5 5 3 ) 92 (2 ) 3 (5) 266 (10)292 (380) 0 (0) 80 (103)50 (27) 2 (2)17 (102)74 7 (6 0 2 ) 16 9 2 (7 3 9 ) 13 3 6 (3 4 2 ) 64 0 (1 0 0 8 ) 5. Tassajara Rd & Fallon Rd 6. Camino Tassajara & Highland Rd 7. El Charro Rd & I‐580 EB ramps 8. El Charro Rd & I‐580 WB ramps 99 1 (4 0 5 ) 55 2 (3 7 6 ) 0 (0 ) 84 9 (2 3 4 ) 50 (2 3 5 ) 348 (150) 86 (514) 110 (304) 12 4 (1 0 4 ) 89 2 (1 5 4 2 ) 19 8 (2 7 5 ) 13 (39) 4. Tassajara Rd & Gleason Dr 83 8 (1 6 7 ) 11 0 1 (1 0 8 7 ) 17 1 (1 4 3 ) 318 (89) 652 (67) 223 (509) 159 (670) 189 (1893) 44 0 (4 6 3 ) 10 3 3 (1 0 3 9 ) 24 4 (8 9 9 ) 844 (253) 72 (76) 658 (259) 3. Tassajara Rd & Dublin Blvd 32 5 (2 4 2 ) 13 3 2 (9 8 5 ) 48 (2 6 7 ) 14 8 3 (2 2 3 7 ) 61 1 (6 7 7 ) 1318 (346) 536 (373) 2. Santa Rita Rd & I‐580 WB ramps 19 5 0 (1 1 4 7 ) 58 4 (9 2 3 ) 992 (590) 705 (256) 183 (325) 85 4 (9 4 6 ) 41 4 (9 6 3 ) 208 (453) 420 (409) 1. Santa Rita Rd & I‐580 EB ramps 55 7 (1 2 0 7 ) 11 3 4 (9 4 ) 16 3 (2 2 ) P:\P\14\14112‐001 City of Dublin On‐Call Tassajara Rd\06 Graphics\Camino Tassajara Volume Figures v2 4.2.e Packet Pg. 161 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) RT RT TH LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT RT TH LT TH RT RT TH RT TH LT LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT TH RT TH LT LT LT LT TH RT TH RT RT RT RT TH TH RT TH LT LT TH LT LT RT TH RT TH LT LT LT TH RT TH RT LT TH RT TH RT TH RT RT RT RT TH TH RT TH LT RT TH RT TH RT TH LT LT LT LT TH RT LT LT TH LT LT TH LT LT TH RT TH TH RT RT RT RT Traffic Signal AM(PM) LEGEND Figure 8 Volume Turning Movements 6‐Lane Cumulative Condition Turn Movement Volumes 347 (1271) 10 8 (1 3 2 ) 59 0 (6 5 7 ) 23 9 (5 1 5 ) 44 (20) 4 (9)16 (102)73 (185) 633 (2473) 67 (0 ) 25 9 (1 5 5 1 ) 26 3 (0 ) 45 (5 7 ) 199 (0) 101 (73) 401 (309) 35 (84) 65 1 (5 4 9 ) 59 1 (3 7 1 ) 23 8 (6 3 4 ) 782 (1133)384 (104) 826 (0)126 (25) 984 (0)671 (477)23 8 (4 5 ) 76 5 (1 5 2 ) 89 (1 7 4 ) 45 7 (5 4 0 ) 59 (1 7 0 ) 9. Fallon Rd & Dublin Blvd 10. Fallon Rd & Sivera Ranch Dr 11. Camino Tassajara & Windemere Pkwy 12. Camino Tassajara & Crow Canyon Rd 72 (7 8 1 ) 10 0 7 (1 5 3 ) 6 (4 5 ) 60 6 (4 8 4 ) 57 8 (1 6 6 3 ) 74 (3 4 ) 64 (163)208 (789) 25 4 (7 2 7 ) 3 (5 9 ) 25 7 (1 6 4 6 ) 63 6 (9 3 1 ) 411 (940)427 (252) 1 (1) 12 8 (4 0 ) 55 0 (5 2 5 ) 92 (2 ) 3 (5) 135 (9)222 (366) 0 (0) 183 (103)75 (0) 2 (2)11 (95)73 4 (6 0 5 ) 17 2 0 (7 4 5 ) 12 9 2 (3 3 8 ) 73 5 (1 0 3 7 ) 5. Tassajara Rd & Fallon Rd 6. Camino Tassajara & Highland Rd 7. El Charro Rd & I‐580 EB ramps 8. El Charro Rd & I‐580 WB ramps 99 4 (3 8 3 ) 53 1 (3 9 8 ) 0 (0 ) 83 0 (2 3 7 ) 44 (2 3 8 ) 423 (191) 83 (391) 111 (232) 12 0 (1 0 5 ) 90 2 (2 0 6 8 ) 21 1 (3 7 0 ) 16 (24) 4. Tassajara Rd & Gleason Dr 82 7 (1 5 4 ) 14 1 6 (1 0 6 7 ) 18 7 (1 7 5 ) 312 (140) 609 (80) 174 (458) 160 (992) 232 (1844) 37 2 (3 4 8 ) 10 1 1 (1 4 7 7 ) 29 1 (8 4 1 ) 788 (315) 86 (155) 680 (281) 3. Tassajara Rd & Dublin Blvd 39 4 (2 1 1 ) 14 6 2 (9 8 8 ) 82 (2 8 9 ) 14 8 6 (2 3 5 1 ) 58 8 (6 7 7 ) 1335 (337) 494 (515) 2. Santa Rita Rd & I‐580 WB ramps 20 0 8 (1 1 4 7 ) 55 0 (9 3 0 ) 953 (611) 727 (285) 194 (330) 83 2 (1 0 0 7 ) 41 5 (9 3 6 ) 192 (438) 416 (426) 1. Santa Rita Rd & I‐580 EB ramps 58 9 (1 2 1 3 ) 10 7 8 (8 6 ) 17 2 (2 0 ) P:\P\14\14112‐001 City of Dublin On‐Call Tassajara Rd\06 Graphics\Camino Tassajara Volume Figures v2 4.2.e Packet Pg. 162 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Roadwa Table 10 Average t through t As shown during AM between in both d time is lo between t a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra ay Peak H compares the travel time w raffic at study in Table 10, M and PM pe Gleason Drive irections. Du nger in almos the scenarios no Tassajara aft Report our Level e estimated a was calculate y intersection all roadway s eak hours in e and North D ring the PM p st all cases un s. of Service average trave ed as the su ns within each segments nor both directio Dublin Ranch peak hour it nder the 4‐La 29 e Analysis el times and s m of free flo h roadway se rth of North D ons. Under bo Drive operat operates at L ane Scenario; (Cumulat segment LOS ow travel tim egment. Dublin Ranch oth scenarios tes at LOS C o LOS E in the ; however the tive 2040 C under each o me and avera h Drive operat s, the segmen or LOS D durin northbound ere is very lit March Conditions of the two sce age signal de te at LOS C o nt of Tassaja ng the AM pe direction. Th tle difference 19, 2015 s) enarios. elay for r better ra Road eak hour e travel e in LOS 4.2.e Packet Pg. 163 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Table 10 – Road Segm Tassajara Rd Gleason Dr a Dublin Ranch Tassajara Rd North Dublin and Fallon Ro Tassajara Rd/ Tassajara bet Rd and Wind Parkway Camino Tass between Win parkway and Street Camino Tass between Lus and Crow Ca Camino Tass between Cro Road and Syc Valley Road Notes: a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra – Cumulative 20 dway ment A between nd North h Dr between n Ranch Dr oad /Camino tween Fallon demere ajara ndemere d Lusitano ajara sitano Street nyon Rd ajara ow Canyon camore Free flow Spee Travel Time (se no Tassajara aft Report 040 Condition Approach Pe Ho SB A P NB A P SB A P NB A P SB A P NB A P SB A P NB A P SB A P NB A P SB A P NB A P d is defined by H ec) = The average s Roadway Se eak our 4‐La Avera Travel T (sec AM 79.7 M 70.0 AM 89.1 M 137. AM 86.0 M 86.0 AM 93.4 M 98.3 AM 103. M 103. AM 89.2 M 90.4 AM 352. M 330. AM 326. M 327. AM 213. M 213. AM 237. M 240. AM 280. M 307. AM 250. M 250. HCM 2010 meth e time taken for 30 gment Level o ane Scenario age Time c) Segme LOS 7 C 0 C 1 D 3 E 0 A 0 A 4 A 3 A 1 B 8 B 2 A 4 A 3 A 5 A 7 A 6 A 9 A 9 A 8 A 7 A 6 A 1 B 8 A 8 A odology a vehicle to trav of Service 6‐Lan ent S Averag Travel Ti (sec) 78.4 61.6 86.2 135.1 85.9 85.9 93.2 98.4 101.9 104.1 88.9 90.4 346.0 329.9 324.6 326.9 213.5 213.5 237.0 241.5 281.1 305.4 250.3 250.3 vel the segment ne Scenario ge ime Segmen LOS C B C E A A A A 9 B B A A 0 A 9 A 6 A 9 A 5 A 5 A 0 A 5 A A 4 B A A t. March Diff nt Average Travel Tim (sec) ‐1.3 ‐8.4 ‐2.9 ‐2.2 ‐0.1 ‐0.1 ‐0.2 0.1 ‐1.2 0.3 ‐0.3 0 ‐6.3 ‐0.6 ‐2.1 ‐0.7 ‐0.4 ‐0.4 ‐0.8 0.8 0.5 ‐1.7 ‐0.5 ‐0.5 19, 2015 ference e Segment LOS No change CB DC No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change No change 4.2.e Packet Pg. 164 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Finding The CCTA the adequ generated Livermore with the m City of D demand m roadway volumes t The level unincorpo The exist Road/Cam similar int under fut difference The result similar le However, scenario p delay per time, the and five m It can the scenarios any signif a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra gs and Co A Countywide uate number d from propo e, San Ramon model output ublin Model. models, the C segments ar than the ACTC of service w orated Contra ting CCTA m mino Tassajar tersection an ture traffic c es in travel pa ts of the Cum evel of servic for intersec provides less r vehicle duri travel time sa minutes. erefore be co that widenin icant benefit no Tassajara aft Report onclusion e Travel Dema of lanes alon osed future d n, Danville a t with forecas While there CCTA Travel re in Contra C and Dublin was conducted a Costa Count model shows ra and this st nd roadway s conditions. T atterns under mulative Cond ce with sligh ctions that a than 10 seco ng the PM p avings is gene oncluded from ng Tassajara R to motorists. s and Model w ng Tassajara R development nd unincorpo sts from the A e is consisten Demand Mod Costa Coun travel deman d for key inte ty to assess a s variable la tudy determi segment LOS The select‐lin r both four la ditions analys ht improveme re expected onds of saving peak hour. Ad erally two sec m the similar Road/Camino . 31 was executed Road/Camino s in the vicin orated Contr Alameda CTC ncy in travel del was used nty and the nd models. ersections in ny possible tr nes (i.e. 2‐3 ned that eith results along k analysis re nes and six la ses for the fo ents at som to experien gs per vehicle dditionally, w conds or less ity in results Tassajara fro for future 20 Tassajara to nity of the C ra Costa Cou C’s Countywid distribution d for the stud model conse Dublin, Live raffic impacts 3 lanes in e her two or th g Tassajara R esults indicat anes scenario our‐lane and s e intersectio ce intolerab e during the A while the six‐l for segments of the analy om four to six 040 traffic vo accommoda amino Tassaj nty. The resu de Travel Dem pattern amo dy because m ervatively for rmore, San R s due to traffi each directio hree lanes pe Road and Cam te that there . six‐lane scena ons under th le delays at AM peak hou ane scenario s with travel t ysis for the fo x lanes is not March olumes to det te traffic that jara Road in ults were co mand Model ong the three majority of th recast higher Ramon, Danv ic diversions. on) along Ta er direction p mino Tassaja e are no sig arios general he six‐lane sc LOS F, the r, and an inc o shows lowe times betwee our‐lane and expected to r 19, 2015 termine t will be Dublin, mpared and the e travel he study r traffic ville and assajara produce ra Road gnificant ly show cenario. six‐lane rease in er travel en three six‐lane result in 4.2.e Packet Pg. 165 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Tassajara Capacity A Study P DKS Perso Bill Loudo David Ma Joshua Pil Adonis Ga Garnet W Deserae M Others Obaid Kha Gary Huis Angela Vi Nancy We John Cunn Reference 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. a Road/Camin Analysis –Dra Participan onnel on, P.E. hama, P.E. lachowski, Ph arefalakis, E.I Wing, E.I.T. Mallori an, P.E. sing llar, P.E. eir ningham es . Mollar . Green . Tri‐Val . Compr (Contr . Highw no Tassajara aft Report nts hD, P.E. .T. r Ranch Traffi Traffic ADSEI lley Transpor rehensive Agr ra Costa Coun way Capacity M Principa Project Transpo Transpo Associat Word P City of D City of D Contra C Contra C Contra C ic Impact Stud IR, Kittleson A tation Plan/A reement to S nty Case No. C Manual, 2000 32 al‐In‐Charge Manager ortation Engin ortation Plann te Transporta rocessing and Dublin Dublin Costa County Costa County Costa County dy Final Repo Associates 10/ Action Plan, D Settle Litigati C‐02‐02250; S 0 and 2010 Tr neer ner ation Enginee d Graphic Des y Public Work y Public Work y Public Work ort, Kimley‐Ho 0/2013 DKS, 2014 ion, Town of San Joaquin C ransportation er signer ks Departmen ks Departmen ks Departmen orn & Associa f Danville v. C County Case N n Research Bo March nt nt nt ates, 09/10/20 Contra Costa No. CV‐020073 oard 19, 2015 012 a, et al., 3) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 166 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Appendix A Intersection Level of Service Analysis 4.2.e Packet Pg. 167 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) APPENDIX A1 Existing Condition 4.2.e Packet Pg. 168 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Santa Rita Road & I-580 EB off-ramp/Pimlico Drive 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)538 147 665 163 0 374 0 779 398 175 1013 228 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 4.0 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.88 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 5085 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 5085 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)578 158 715 175 0 402 0 838 428 188 1089 245 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 84 0 0 19 0 0 316 0 0 134 Lane Group Flow (vph) 578 158 631 175 0 383 0 838 112 188 1089 111 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot custom NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 3 8 7 5 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.9 30.5 30.5 9.9 38.4 26.7 26.7 15.4 46.1 46.1 Effective Green, g (s) 21.9 30.5 30.5 9.9 33.9 26.7 26.7 15.4 46.1 46.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.33 0.26 0.26 0.15 0.45 0.45 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 739 558 474 334 928 1334 415 268 1603 717 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.08 0.05 0.14 0.16 0.11 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.07 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.28 1.33 0.52 0.41 0.63 0.27 0.70 0.68 0.15 Uniform Delay, d1 37.7 27.3 35.6 43.7 26.3 33.2 29.8 41.0 22.0 16.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.0 0.1 163.0 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.4 6.6 1.2 0.1 Delay (s)42.7 27.4 198.6 44.4 26.4 34.1 30.2 47.6 23.2 16.5 Level of Service D C F D C CCDCB Approach Delay (s)117.9 31.8 32.8 25.1 Approach LOS F C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 55.9 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 101.8 Sum of lost time (s)16.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 169 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Santa Rita Road/Tassajara Road & I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 544 0 315 0 1009 553 0 866 844 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 3539 1583 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 3539 1583 5085 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 567 0 328 0 1051 576 0 902 917 RTOR Reduction (vph)000001250025600407 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 567 0 203 0 1051 320 0 902 510 Turn Type Prot custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s)15.1 15.1 33.1 33.1 33.1 33.1 Effective Green, g (s)15.1 15.1 33.1 33.1 33.1 33.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)871 707 1969 881 2829 1550 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 c0.30 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.20 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.29 0.53 0.36 0.32 0.33 Uniform Delay, d1 19.8 17.9 8.3 7.3 7.1 7.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 Delay (s)21.2 18.0 8.6 7.6 7.2 7.3 Level of Service C B A A A A Approach Delay (s)0.0 20.0 8.3 7.2 Approach LOS ABAA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 10.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 59.5 Sum of lost time (s)11.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 170 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)59 63 181 384 191 15 329 553 117 16 1094 170 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.88 0.94 0.95 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 2787 4990 3502 4990 3539 1583 3433 6408 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 2787 4990 3502 4990 3539 1583 3433 6408 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)61 65 187 396 197 15 339 570 121 16 1128 175 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 31 03000350053 Lane Group Flow (vph) 61 65 156 396 209 0 339 570 86 16 1128 122 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 52316 38 74 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 16.0 32.4 17.1 17.1 16.4 88.5 88.5 5.9 78.0 78.0 Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 16.0 32.4 17.1 17.1 16.4 88.5 88.5 5.9 78.0 78.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.22 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.59 0.59 0.04 0.52 0.52 Clearance Time (s)5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 367 379 604 571 401 547 2095 937 135 3343 1454 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.02 0.03 c0.08 c0.06 c0.07 0.16 0.00 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.05 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.26 0.69 0.52 0.62 0.27 0.09 0.12 0.34 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 60.7 60.7 48.6 63.7 62.4 63.6 14.8 13.2 69.3 20.8 17.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.2 0.1 2.9 1.2 1.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 Delay (s)60.8 60.9 48.7 66.6 63.6 65.0 15.2 13.4 69.4 21.0 18.0 Level of Service E E D E E EBBECB Approach Delay (s)53.6 65.6 31.4 21.2 Approach LOS D E C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 35.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 149.5 Sum of lost time (s)16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 171 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Tassajara Road & Gleason Drive 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)48 114 33 252 155 51 86 416 172 59 920 230 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 1863 1583 3433 1794 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 1863 1583 3433 1794 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Adj. Flow (vph)58 137 40 304 187 61 104 501 207 71 1108 277 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 34 0800011600115 Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 137 6 304 240 0 104 501 91 71 1108 162 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.5 15.2 15.2 13.6 23.3 8.0 43.6 43.6 7.7 43.3 43.3 Effective Green, g (s) 5.5 15.2 15.2 13.6 23.3 8.0 43.6 43.6 7.7 43.3 43.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.23 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.44 0.44 Clearance Time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 4.5 4.5 2.5 4.5 2.5 4.0 4.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 190 285 242 470 421 276 1552 694 137 1542 690 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.07 c0.09 c0.13 0.03 0.14 c0.04 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.06 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.48 0.03 0.65 0.57 0.38 0.32 0.13 0.52 0.72 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 45.1 38.5 35.8 40.6 33.6 43.3 18.2 16.6 44.1 23.0 17.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 2.2 0.1 2.7 2.5 0.6 0.2 0.1 2.5 1.7 0.2 Delay (s)45.8 40.7 35.9 43.3 36.1 44.0 18.4 16.7 46.5 24.8 17.9 Level of Service DDDDD DBBDCB Approach Delay (s)41.1 40.1 21.3 24.5 Approach LOS DDCC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 27.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 99.4 Sum of lost time (s)14.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 172 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Fallon Road/Camino Tassajara & Tassajara Road/Syrah Drive 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)192 5 21 2 3 0 21 42 88 0 120 681 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1770 1863 1583 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1770 1863 1583 1863 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)206 5 23 2 3 0 23 45 95 0 129 732 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 16 000005400486 Lane Group Flow (vph) 206 572302345410129246 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.9 16.8 16.8 1.0 0.9 0.9 24.0 24.0 18.5 18.5 Effective Green, g (s) 16.9 16.8 16.8 1.0 0.9 0.9 24.0 24.0 18.5 18.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.44 0.44 0.34 0.34 Clearance Time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 544 569 484 32 30 29 813 691 627 532 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.00 0.00 c0.00 c0.01 0.02 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.03 c0.16 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.10 0.79 0.06 0.06 0.21 0.46 Uniform Delay, d1 14.9 13.3 13.3 26.5 26.7 27.0 9.0 9.0 13.0 14.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 2.0 79.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.9 Delay (s)15.5 13.3 13.3 27.7 28.6 106.5 9.0 9.0 13.2 15.2 Level of Service B B B C C F A A B B Approach Delay (s)15.3 28.2 22.7 14.9 Approach LOS B C C B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 16.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.38 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 55.0 Sum of lost time (s)13.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 173 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Camino Tassajara & Highland Road 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph)97 264 170 2 53 443 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1657 1860 1770 1863 Flt Permitted 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1657 1860 1770 1863 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)102 278 179 2 56 466 RTOR Reduction (vph) 65 00000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 315 0 181 0 56 466 Turn Type NA NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 22.0 92.2 7.5 103.7 Effective Green, g (s) 22.0 92.2 7.5 103.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.68 0.06 0.76 Clearance Time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 269 1264 98 1424 v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 0.10 c0.03 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 1.17 0.14 0.57 0.33 Uniform Delay, d1 56.8 7.7 62.5 5.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 109.9 0.2 4.9 0.6 Delay (s)166.7 8.0 67.5 5.6 Level of Service F A E A Approach Delay (s) 166.7 8.0 12.3 Approach LOS F A B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 65.8 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 135.7 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 174 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: El Charro Road & I-580 EB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)182 0 71 00007521059270 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 3378 1441 3037 1441 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 3378 1441 3037 1441 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)202 0 79 00008323066300 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 61 0000100940 Lane Group Flow (vph) 202 0 18 000084210122150 Turn Type custom custom NA Free NA Free Protected Phases 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 4.4 4.4 7.4 19.8 7.4 19.8 Effective Green, g (s) 4.4 4.4 7.4 19.8 7.4 19.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.37 1.00 0.37 1.00 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 763 619 1262 1441 1135 1441 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.01 0.01 c0.10 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.11 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 6.4 6.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Delay (s)6.4 6.0 4.0 0.0 4.1 0.1 Level of Service A A A A A A Approach Delay (s)6.3 0.0 3.2 2.5 Approach LOS AAAA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 4.0 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.15 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 19.8 Sum of lost time (s)4.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 175 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: El Charro Road/Fallon Road & I-580 WB on-ramp/I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 58 2 198 0 181 74 0 274 347 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)3.5 3.5 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.99 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1681 1690 2787 1759 1504 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1681 1690 2787 1759 1504 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 64 2 220 0 201 82 0 304 386 RTOR Reduction (vph)0000013301000184 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 33 33 87 0 208 74 0 304 202 Turn Type Perm NA custom NA Free NA Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 1 8 Free 6 Actuated Green, G (s)10.1 10.1 18.2 11.8 37.0 19.4 19.4 Effective Green, g (s)10.1 10.1 14.7 11.8 37.0 19.4 19.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.40 0.32 1.00 0.52 0.52 Clearance Time (s)3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)459 461 1107 561 1504 1856 830 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.02 c0.03 0.05 c0.13 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.37 0.05 0.16 0.24 Uniform Delay, d1 10.0 10.0 6.9 9.7 0.0 4.6 4.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 Delay (s)10.0 10.0 6.9 9.9 0.1 4.6 4.9 Level of Service A A A A A A A Approach Delay (s)0.0 7.7 7.3 4.7 Approach LOS AAAA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.0 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.25 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 37.0 Sum of lost time (s)11.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 176 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)18 0 87 0 0 0 56 258 0 0 512 29 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.3 4.9 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 2787 1770 3539 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 2787 1770 3539 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)19 0 92 0 0 0 59 272 0 0 539 31 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 75 0000000011 Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 0 17 0 0 0 59 272 0 0 539 20 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.7 14.4 5.7 56.8 45.8 52.5 Effective Green, g (s) 6.7 14.4 5.7 56.8 45.8 52.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.18 0.07 0.71 0.57 0.66 Clearance Time (s)5.3 4.9 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 148 501 126 2510 2024 1142 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.03 0.08 c0.15 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm c0.01 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.03 0.47 0.11 0.27 0.02 Uniform Delay, d1 34.0 27.1 35.7 3.7 8.7 4.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 Delay (s)34.1 27.1 36.7 3.8 9.0 4.8 Level of Service C C D A A A Approach Delay (s)28.3 0.0 9.6 8.8 Approach LOS C A A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.2 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.24 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.1 Sum of lost time (s)14.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 177 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Fallon Road & Silvera Ranch Drive 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 10 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)1 29 11 65 138 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1616 1770 1863 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1616 1770 1863 1863 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Adj. Flow (vph)1 39 15 88 186 4 RTOR Reduction (vph) 38 00002 Lane Group Flow (vph) 2 0 15 88 186 2 Turn Type NA Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 1.0 1.1 28.3 23.2 23.2 Effective Green, g (s) 1.0 1.1 28.3 23.2 23.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.03 0.73 0.60 0.60 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)42 50 1366 1120 951 v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 c0.01 0.05 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.30 0.06 0.17 0.00 Uniform Delay, d1 18.3 18.4 1.4 3.4 3.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 3.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 Delay (s)18.5 21.7 1.5 3.6 3.1 Level of Service B C A A A Approach Delay (s) 18.5 4.4 3.5 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 5.6 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.17 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 38.6 Sum of lost time (s)13.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 178 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Camino Tassajara & Windemere Parkway 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 11 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)20 287 82 148 501 62 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 0.97 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 2787 3433 1863 3481 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 2787 3433 1863 3481 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)22 312 89 161 545 67 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 270 0020 Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 42 89 161 610 0 Turn Type NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 17.4 7.7 104.1 92.4 Effective Green, g (s) 4.0 17.4 7.7 104.1 92.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.14 0.06 0.81 0.72 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)55 379 207 1518 2517 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.02 c0.03 0.09 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.40 0.11 0.43 0.11 0.24 Uniform Delay, d1 60.7 48.4 57.9 2.4 5.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 Delay (s)62.5 48.5 58.5 2.5 6.2 Level of Service E D E A A Approach Delay (s) 49.4 22.5 6.2 Approach LOS D C A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 21.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.26 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 127.8 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 179 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Crow Canyon Road/Blackhawk Road & Camino Tassajara 3/18/2015 Existing AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)71 282 99 252 434 28 193 364 124 15 408 78 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 4990 3507 3433 3373 1441 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 4990 3507 3433 3373 1441 3433 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)77 307 108 274 472 30 210 396 135 16 443 85 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 87 03001760051 Lane Group Flow (vph) 77 307 21 274 499 0 210 409 45 16 443 34 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.4 14.6 14.6 12.2 21.4 10.2 28.7 28.7 1.9 20.4 20.4 Effective Green, g (s) 5.4 14.6 14.6 12.2 21.4 10.2 28.7 28.7 1.9 20.4 20.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.16 0.28 0.13 0.38 0.38 0.02 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 243 676 303 797 982 458 1267 541 85 945 423 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.09 0.05 c0.14 c0.06 0.12 0.00 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.03 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.45 0.07 0.34 0.51 0.46 0.32 0.08 0.19 0.47 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 33.7 27.4 25.3 28.5 23.1 30.6 16.9 15.4 36.5 23.5 21.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.1 Delay (s)34.0 28.0 25.5 28.6 23.7 30.8 17.1 15.5 36.9 24.0 21.1 Level of Service CCCCC CBBDCC Approach Delay (s)28.4 25.4 20.7 23.9 Approach LOS CCCC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 24.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 76.4 Sum of lost time (s)20.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 180 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Santa Rita Road & I-580 EB off-ramp/Pimlico Drive 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)434 226 338 179 0 479 0 1288 537 288 1021 298 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 4.0 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.88 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 5085 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 5085 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph)452 235 352 186 0 499 0 1342 559 300 1064 310 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 89 0 0 15 0 0 326 0 0 143 Lane Group Flow (vph) 452 235 263 186 0 484 0 1342 233 300 1064 167 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot custom NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 3 8 7 5 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 28.1 28.1 11.8 47.5 37.1 37.1 23.1 64.2 64.2 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 28.1 28.1 11.8 43.0 37.1 37.1 23.1 64.2 64.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.36 0.31 0.31 0.19 0.54 0.54 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 575 438 373 339 1004 1580 492 342 1903 851 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.13 0.05 0.17 c0.26 c0.17 0.30 v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 0.15 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.54 0.71 0.55 0.48 0.85 0.47 0.88 0.56 0.20 Uniform Delay, d1 47.6 40.0 41.9 51.3 29.6 38.5 33.3 46.8 18.2 14.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.0 1.3 6.0 1.8 0.4 5.9 3.2 21.4 1.2 0.5 Delay (s)54.6 41.2 47.8 53.1 29.9 44.4 36.5 68.2 19.4 14.8 Level of Service DDDD C DDEBB Approach Delay (s)49.3 36.2 42.1 27.3 Approach LOS DDDC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 119.4 Sum of lost time (s)14.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 181 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Santa Rita Road/Tassajara Road & I-580 WEB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 509 0 298 0 1433 677 0 1104 647 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.88 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 3539 1583 5085 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 3539 1583 5085 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 530 0 310 0 1493 705 0 1150 703 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000430026600266 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 530 0 267 0 1493 439 0 1150 437 Turn Type Prot custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s)17.3 17.3 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 Effective Green, g (s)17.3 17.3 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)785 637 2202 985 3164 1734 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 c0.42 0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.28 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.42 0.68 0.45 0.36 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1 26.6 24.9 9.3 7.5 7.0 6.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 0.4 1.7 1.5 0.3 0.3 Delay (s)28.9 25.4 11.0 8.9 7.3 6.8 Level of Service C C B A A A Approach Delay (s)0.0 27.6 10.4 7.1 Approach LOS A C B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.1 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.7 Sum of lost time (s)11.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 182 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)306 551 477 233 147 34 402 714 394 55 654 99 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.88 0.94 0.95 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 2787 4990 3440 4990 3539 1583 3433 6408 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 2787 4990 3440 4990 3539 1583 3433 6408 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph)319 574 497 243 153 35 419 744 410 57 681 103 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 71 060001620080 Lane Group Flow (vph) 319 574 426 243 182 0 419 744 248 57 681 23 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 52316 38 74 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.5 81.5 102.7 16.5 75.5 21.2 47.0 47.0 15.1 40.9 40.9 Effective Green, g (s) 22.5 81.5 102.7 16.5 75.5 21.2 47.0 47.0 15.1 40.9 40.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.45 0.56 0.09 0.41 0.12 0.26 0.26 0.08 0.22 0.22 Clearance Time (s)5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 424 1584 1572 452 1426 581 913 409 285 1439 626 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.16 0.03 0.05 0.05 c0.08 c0.21 0.02 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.16 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.36 0.27 0.54 0.13 0.72 0.81 0.61 0.20 0.47 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 77.1 33.2 20.4 79.2 32.9 77.6 63.5 59.4 77.9 61.3 55.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.6 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.2 3.7 5.7 2.5 0.1 0.2 0.0 Delay (s)83.7 33.8 20.5 79.8 33.1 81.3 69.1 61.9 78.0 61.5 55.2 Level of Service F C C E C F EEEEE Approach Delay (s)40.5 59.4 70.5 61.9 Approach LOS D E E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 57.8 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 182.1 Sum of lost time (s)16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 183 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Tassajara Road & Gleason Drive 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)213 192 66 151 67 22 191 703 191 23 466 71 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 1863 1583 3433 1794 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 1863 1583 3433 1794 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph)234 211 73 166 74 24 210 773 210 25 512 78 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 46 060001440059 Lane Group Flow (vph) 234 211 27 166 92 0 210 773 66 25 512 19 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 40.7 40.7 10.9 38.6 12.3 34.8 34.8 4.5 27.0 27.0 Effective Green, g (s) 13.0 40.7 40.7 10.9 38.6 12.3 34.8 34.8 4.5 27.0 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.37 0.37 0.10 0.35 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.25 0.25 Clearance Time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 405 688 585 340 628 383 1118 500 72 867 388 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 c0.11 0.05 0.05 c0.06 c0.22 0.01 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.04 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.31 0.05 0.49 0.15 0.55 0.69 0.13 0.35 0.59 0.05 Uniform Delay, d1 46.0 24.7 22.3 47.0 24.5 46.3 33.0 26.9 51.4 36.7 31.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 1.2 0.1 1.1 0.5 1.6 1.9 0.1 2.9 1.1 0.1 Delay (s)48.0 25.9 22.4 48.1 25.0 47.9 34.9 27.0 54.3 37.8 31.8 Level of Service DCCDC DCCDDC Approach Delay (s)35.4 39.5 35.8 37.7 Approach LOS DDDD Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 36.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.2 Sum of lost time (s)14.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 184 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Fallon Road/Camino Tassajara & Tassajara Road/Syrah Drive 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)514 1 18 33161271179235 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)559 1 20 33171381186255 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 14 00100100146 Lane Group Flow (vph) 559 1633071380186109 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 47.5 44.5 44.5 15.0 12.0 12.0 1.8 59.6 59.6 1.8 59.5 59.5 Effective Green, g (s) 47.5 44.5 44.5 15.0 12.0 12.0 1.8 59.6 59.6 1.8 59.5 59.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.32 0.32 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.43 0.43 0.01 0.43 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 607 598 508 192 161 137 23 801 681 23 800 680 v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.00 0.00 c0.00 c0.00 c0.07 0.00 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.30 0.17 0.00 0.04 0.11 0.16 Uniform Delay, d1 43.7 32.0 32.1 55.2 57.9 57.8 67.8 24.3 22.5 67.5 23.7 24.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 2.7 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 Delay (s)65.3 32.0 32.1 55.4 58.1 57.8 70.5 24.8 22.5 67.8 23.9 24.8 Level of Service E C C EEEECCECC Approach Delay (s)64.1 56.9 27.0 24.7 Approach LOS E E C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 46.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 138.6 Sum of lost time (s)13.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 185 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Camino Tassajara & Highland Road 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph)5 43 415 47 215 208 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.88 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1629 1837 1770 1863 Flt Permitted 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1629 1837 1770 1863 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)5 44 428 48 222 214 RTOR Reduction (vph) 42 02000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 0 474 0 222 214 Turn Type NA NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 4.7 92.3 19.8 116.1 Effective Green, g (s) 4.7 92.3 19.8 116.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.71 0.15 0.89 Clearance Time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)59 1296 268 1654 v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 c0.26 c0.13 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.11 0.37 0.83 0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 61.0 7.6 53.9 0.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.8 17.8 0.2 Delay (s)61.3 8.4 71.7 1.1 Level of Service E A E A Approach Delay (s) 61.3 8.4 37.0 Approach LOS E A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 24.1 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.8 Sum of lost time (s)14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 186 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: El Charro Road & I-580 EB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)182 0 19 0000331580157425 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.89 0.85 0.91 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 3032 1441 3098 1441 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 3032 1441 3098 1441 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)198 0 21 0000361720171462 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0000212105656 Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 030000101650346175 Turn Type Prot custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.1 8.1 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 Effective Green, g (s) 8.1 8.1 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 421 342 2293 1090 2343 1090 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.03 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.05 c0.12 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.15 0.16 Uniform Delay, d1 27.0 25.5 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 Delay (s)27.3 25.5 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 Level of Service C C A A A A Approach Delay (s)27.1 0.0 2.1 2.4 Approach LOS C A A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 7.5 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.20 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 66.1 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 187 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: El Charro Road/Fallon Road & I-580 WB on-ramp/I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 22 6 314 0 189 32 0 571 196 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)3.5 3.5 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1681 1718 2787 1766 1504 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1681 1718 2787 1766 1504 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 23 6 334 0 201 34 0 607 209 RTOR Reduction (vph)0000026500110052 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 14 15 69 0 204 20 0 607 157 Turn Type Perm NA custom NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 1 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s)10.0 10.0 18.0 45.0 45.0 52.5 52.5 Effective Green, g (s)10.0 10.0 14.5 45.0 45.0 52.5 52.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.64 0.64 0.75 0.75 Clearance Time (s)3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)240 245 577 1135 967 2654 1187 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.01 c0.02 0.01 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.02 0.23 0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 25.9 25.9 22.6 5.0 4.5 2.6 2.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 Delay (s)26.0 26.0 22.6 5.4 4.6 2.8 2.7 Level of Service C C C A A A A Approach Delay (s)0.0 22.9 5.3 2.8 Approach LOS A C A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 8.4 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.21 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s)7.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 188 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)88 1 329 1 0 0 79 307 0 0 360 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.3 4.9 4.9 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1863 2787 1770 1770 3539 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 1863 2787 1770 1770 3539 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)91 1 339 1 0 0 81 316 0 0 371 21 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 286 000000007 Lane Group Flow (vph) 91 1 53 1 0 0 81 316 0 0 371 14 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.7 12.8 12.8 0.8 6.7 54.5 42.5 53.2 Effective Green, g (s) 10.7 12.8 12.8 0.8 6.7 54.5 42.5 53.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.16 0.16 0.01 0.08 0.66 0.52 0.65 Clearance Time (s)5.3 4.9 4.9 5.3 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 230 290 433 17 144 2344 1828 1125 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.00 0.00 c0.05 0.09 c0.10 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm c0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.00 0.12 0.06 0.56 0.13 0.20 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 32.8 29.4 29.9 40.4 36.4 5.2 10.8 5.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.5 3.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 Delay (s)33.2 29.4 30.1 40.9 39.4 5.3 11.0 5.2 Level of Service CCCD DA BA Approach Delay (s)30.8 40.9 12.2 10.7 Approach LOS C D B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 18.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.26 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 82.3 Sum of lost time (s)14.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 189 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Fallon Road & Silvera Ranch Drive 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 10 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)5 10 9 128 78 19 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1671 1770 1863 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1671 1770 1863 1863 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Adj. Flow (vph)6 11 10 147 90 22 RTOR Reduction (vph) 11 00005 Lane Group Flow (vph) 6 0 10 147 90 17 Turn Type NA Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 1.1 1.3 64.8 59.5 59.5 Effective Green, g (s) 1.1 1.3 64.8 59.5 59.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.86 0.79 0.79 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)24 31 1605 1474 1253 v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 c0.01 c0.08 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.32 0.09 0.06 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 36.6 36.5 0.8 1.7 1.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 6.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Delay (s)38.7 42.5 0.9 1.8 1.7 Level of Service D D A A A Approach Delay (s) 38.7 3.5 1.8 Approach LOS D A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 4.9 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.09 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.2 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 190 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Camino Tassajara & Windemere Parkway 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 11 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)30 124 214 428 188 35 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 0.97 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 2787 3433 1863 3456 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 2787 3433 1863 3456 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph)32 132 228 455 200 37 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 110 0040 Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 22 228 455 233 0 Turn Type NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 4.7 22.5 13.3 109.8 92.5 Effective Green, g (s) 4.7 22.5 13.3 109.8 92.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.17 0.10 0.82 0.69 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)62 469 342 1530 2391 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.01 c0.07 c0.24 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.52 0.05 0.67 0.30 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 63.4 46.6 58.1 2.8 6.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 0.0 3.8 0.5 0.1 Delay (s)66.4 46.6 61.8 3.3 6.9 Level of Service E D E A A Approach Delay (s) 50.5 22.9 6.9 Approach LOS D C A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 23.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.33 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 133.7 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 191 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Crow Canyon Road/Blackhawk Road & Camino Tassajara 3/18/2015 Existing PM 10/3/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)128 1017 184 172 438 13 183 516 468 46 402 72 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 4990 3524 3433 3268 1441 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 4990 3524 3433 3268 1441 3433 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)139 1105 200 187 476 14 199 561 509 50 437 78 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 75 0100152090053 Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 1105 125 187 489 0 199 724 122 50 437 25 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.1 39.0 39.0 9.8 38.7 12.0 43.0 43.0 5.9 36.9 36.9 Effective Green, g (s) 10.1 39.0 39.0 9.8 38.7 12.0 43.0 43.0 5.9 36.9 36.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.33 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.05 0.32 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 297 1183 529 419 1169 353 1204 531 174 1119 501 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.31 0.04 c0.14 c0.06 c0.22 0.01 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.08 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.93 0.24 0.45 0.42 0.56 0.60 0.23 0.29 0.39 0.05 Uniform Delay, d1 50.7 37.6 28.1 50.9 30.3 49.9 29.9 25.4 53.4 31.1 27.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 13.2 0.2 0.8 0.2 2.1 2.2 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.2 Delay (s)51.9 50.8 28.3 51.6 30.5 51.9 32.1 26.4 54.3 32.2 27.9 Level of Service DDCDC DCCDCC Approach Delay (s)47.8 36.3 33.7 33.5 Approach LOS DDCC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 39.3 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 116.7 Sum of lost time (s)9.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 192 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) APPENDIX A2 Cumulative Conditions 4-Lane Scenario 4.2.e Packet Pg. 193 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Santa Rita Road & I-580 EB off-ramp/Pimlico Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)705 183 992 208 0 420 0 854 414 163 1134 557 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 4.0 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.88 0.95 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 3539 2787 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 3539 2787 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)758 197 1067 224 0 452 0 918 445 175 1219 599 RTOR Reduction (vph)00700320031800336 Lane Group Flow (vph) 758 197 1060 224 0 420 0 918 127 175 1219 263 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot custom NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 3 8 7 5 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.4 47.6 47.6 5.5 31.0 31.3 31.3 6.3 41.6 41.6 Effective Green, g (s) 28.4 47.6 47.6 5.5 31.0 31.3 31.3 6.3 41.6 41.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.38 0.38 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 886 806 685 172 785 1007 793 101 1338 599 v/s Ratio Prot 0.22 0.11 c0.07 0.15 0.26 c0.10 c0.34 v/s Ratio Perm c0.67 0.05 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.24 1.55 1.30 0.54 0.91 0.16 1.73 0.91 0.44 Uniform Delay, d1 38.8 19.8 31.2 52.2 33.4 38.0 29.5 51.9 32.4 25.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.61 0.16 Incremental Delay, d2 7.8 0.1 253.7 171.8 0.4 13.7 0.4 349.2 5.9 1.2 Delay (s)46.7 19.9 284.9 224.0 33.8 51.7 29.9 387.7 25.7 5.3 Level of Service D B F F C D C F C A Approach Delay (s)169.8 96.8 44.6 51.4 Approach LOS F F D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 94.5 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.35 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s)19.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.0% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 194 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Santa Rita Road/Tassajara Road & I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 1318 0 536 0 1483 611 0 584 1950 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.91 0.86 0.86 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.90 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 4863 4348 1362 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 4863 4348 1362 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 1373 0 558 0 1545 636 0 608 2120 RTOR Reduction (vph)000001206600282559 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1373 0 546 0 2115 0 0 1386 501 Turn Type Prot custom NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s)46.7 46.7 52.0 52.0 52.0 Effective Green, g (s)46.7 46.7 52.0 52.0 52.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.47 0.47 0.47 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)1457 1183 2299 2055 644 v/s Ratio Prot c0.40 c0.43 0.32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.46 0.92 1.07dr 0.78 Uniform Delay, d1 30.4 22.7 27.1 22.4 24.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.2 0.1 5.1 1.8 9.0 Delay (s)42.6 22.8 24.9 24.2 33.2 Level of Service D C C C C Approach Delay (s)0.0 36.9 24.9 27.7 Approach LOS A D C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 29.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s)11.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 195 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)159 189 223 844 658 72 440 1033 244 48 1332 325 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.88 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.86 0.88 0.97 0.86 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 6408 2787 3433 6408 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 6408 2787 3433 6408 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)164 195 230 870 678 74 454 1065 252 49 1373 335 RTOR Reduction (vph)00400590014800201 Lane Group Flow (vph) 164 195 226 870 678 15 454 1065 104 49 1373 134 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 52316 38 74 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 16.0 33.0 26.8 26.8 26.8 17.0 53.7 53.7 11.8 48.5 48.5 Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 16.0 33.0 26.8 26.8 26.8 17.0 53.7 53.7 11.8 48.5 48.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.25 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.41 0.41 0.09 0.37 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 422 624 706 1026 1046 326 651 2641 1149 311 2385 1037 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.04 0.04 c0.17 c0.13 c0.09 0.17 0.01 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.31 0.32 0.85 0.65 0.05 0.70 0.40 0.09 0.16 0.58 0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 52.6 52.1 39.5 49.8 47.4 41.5 54.2 27.0 23.4 54.7 32.7 27.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.3 0.1 6.4 1.4 0.1 2.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 1.0 0.3 Delay (s)52.9 52.4 39.6 56.2 48.8 41.6 56.8 27.5 23.5 54.8 33.7 27.2 Level of Service D D D E D D E CCDCC Approach Delay (s)47.5 52.4 34.4 33.1 Approach LOS DDCC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 40.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 130.3 Sum of lost time (s)16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 196 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Tassajara Road & Gleason Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)86 110 13 348 652 318 124 892 198 171 1101 838 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 3433 3365 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 3433 3365 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Adj. Flow (vph)104 133 16 419 786 383 149 1075 239 206 1327 1010 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 12 0 41 0 0 0 130 0 0 72 Lane Group Flow (vph) 104 133 4 419 1128 0 149 1075 109 206 1327 938 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.0 37.0 37.0 14.5 46.5 5.5 54.6 54.6 19.6 68.7 68.7 Effective Green, g (s) 5.0 37.0 37.0 14.5 46.5 5.5 54.6 54.6 19.6 68.7 68.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.32 0.04 0.38 0.38 0.14 0.47 0.47 Clearance Time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 4.5 4.5 2.5 4.5 2.5 4.0 4.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 118 903 404 343 1079 130 1333 596 239 1677 750 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.04 c0.12 c0.34 0.04 0.30 c0.12 0.37 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.07 c0.59 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.15 0.01 1.22 1.05 1.15 0.81 0.18 0.86 0.79 1.25 Uniform Delay, d1 69.7 41.8 40.3 65.2 49.2 69.8 40.5 30.3 61.4 32.1 38.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 48.0 0.1 0.0 123.1 40.1 123.6 3.9 0.2 25.6 2.8 123.7 Delay (s)117.7 41.9 40.3 188.4 89.4 193.3 44.3 30.5 87.0 34.9 161.8 Level of Service F D D F F F D C F C F Approach Delay (s)73.0 115.5 57.3 89.5 Approach LOS E F E F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 87.8 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.16 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 145.0 Sum of lost time (s)14.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 197 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Fallon Road/Camino Tassajara & Tassajara Road/Syrah Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)455 1 97 3 2 0 144 468 92 0 552 991 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 0.94 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)4990 3539 1583 1770 1863 1770 3539 1583 3539 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)4990 3539 1583 1770 1863 1770 3539 1583 3539 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)489 1 104 3 2 0 155 503 99 0 594 1066 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 82 000004000659 Lane Group Flow (vph) 489 1 22 3 2 0 155 503 59 0 594 407 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.5 16.5 16.5 1.5 4.5 11.9 46.0 46.0 29.5 29.5 Effective Green, g (s) 13.5 16.5 16.5 1.5 4.5 11.9 46.0 46.0 29.5 29.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.06 0.15 0.60 0.60 0.38 0.38 Clearance Time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 873 756 338 34 109 273 2109 943 1352 1065 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 c0.09 0.14 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm c0.01 0.04 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.00 0.07 0.09 0.02 0.57 0.24 0.06 0.44 0.38 Uniform Delay, d1 29.1 23.9 24.2 37.2 34.3 30.3 7.3 6.5 17.7 17.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.1 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 Delay (s)30.1 23.9 24.3 38.7 34.4 31.9 7.4 6.6 18.0 17.6 Level of Service CCCDC CAA BB Approach Delay (s)29.1 37.0 12.3 17.7 Approach LOS C D B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 18.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.2 Sum of lost time (s)13.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 198 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Camino Tassajara & Highland Road 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph)266 80 232 12 50 849 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1738 3512 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1738 3512 1770 3539 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)280 84 244 13 53 894 RTOR Reduction (vph) 31 08000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 333 0 249 0 53 894 Turn Type NA NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.6 12.8 1.8 18.6 Effective Green, g (s) 10.6 12.8 1.8 18.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.33 0.05 0.47 Clearance Time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 470 1147 81 1679 v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 0.07 0.03 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.71 0.22 0.65 0.53 Uniform Delay, d1 12.9 9.6 18.4 7.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.0 0.4 13.5 1.2 Delay (s)16.9 10.0 31.9 8.5 Level of Service B B C A Approach Delay (s) 16.9 10.0 9.8 Approach LOS B B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 39.2 Sum of lost time (s)10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 199 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: El Charro Road & I-580 EB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)429 0 206 000027763601692 747 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 4420 1362 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 4420 1362 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)477 0 229 000030870701880 830 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 00001340000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 477 0 211 000052835301880 830 Turn Type custom custom NA Free NA Free Protected Phases 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 10.9 10.9 31.1 50.0 31.1 50.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.9 10.9 31.1 50.0 31.1 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.62 1.00 0.62 1.00 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 748 608 2749 1362 3163 1583 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.37 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.08 0.26 c0.52 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.35 0.19 0.26 0.59 0.52 Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 16.5 4.1 0.0 5.7 0.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.2 Delay (s)19.1 16.7 4.2 0.5 6.0 1.2 Level of Service B B A A A A Approach Delay (s)18.3 0.0 2.9 4.5 Approach LOS BAAA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.3 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.0 Sum of lost time (s)4.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 200 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: El Charro Road/Fallon Road & I-580 WB on-ramp/I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 292 17 50 0 578 74 0 640 1336 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)3.5 3.5 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.91 1.00 0.86 0.86 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1681 1694 2787 5085 1583 4438 1362 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1681 1694 2787 5085 1583 4438 1362 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 324 19 56 0 642 82 0 711 1484 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000440000233233 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 172 171 12 0 642 82 0 1220 509 Turn Type Perm NA custom NA Free NA Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 1 8 Free 6 Actuated Green, G (s)8.2 8.2 14.2 28.8 50.0 34.3 34.3 Effective Green, g (s)8.2 8.2 10.7 28.8 50.0 34.3 34.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.21 0.58 1.00 0.69 0.69 Clearance Time (s)3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)276 278 596 2929 1583 3044 934 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 0.27 v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.10 0.00 0.05 c0.37 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.02 0.22 0.05 0.40 0.54 Uniform Delay, d1 19.5 19.4 15.5 5.1 0.0 3.4 3.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 2.8 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 2.3 Delay (s)22.6 22.3 15.5 2.2 0.1 3.8 6.2 Level of Service C C B A A A A Approach Delay (s)0.0 21.5 1.9 4.6 Approach LOS A C A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.0 Sum of lost time (s)7.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 201 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)36 568 149 762 954 884 56 241 267 667 1028 73 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.3 4.9 4.9 5.3 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.88 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 0.88 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 5085 2787 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 5085 2787 3433 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)38 598 157 802 1004 931 59 254 281 702 1082 77 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 119 0 0 505 0 0 245 0 0 38 Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 598 38 802 1004 426 59 254 36 702 1082 39 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 8462 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.1 20.9 20.9 25.6 43.4 43.4 3.0 13.2 13.2 23.7 33.9 37.0 Effective Green, g (s) 3.1 20.9 20.9 25.6 43.4 43.4 3.0 13.2 13.2 23.7 33.9 37.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.42 0.42 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.23 0.33 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 5.3 4.9 4.9 5.3 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 103 1033 566 1241 2145 668 145 652 358 791 1675 569 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.12 0.16 0.20 0.01 c0.05 c0.20 c0.21 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.27 0.01 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.58 0.07 0.65 0.47 0.64 0.41 0.39 0.10 0.89 0.65 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 48.9 37.0 33.1 34.6 21.4 23.5 49.1 41.2 39.6 38.3 29.4 21.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.2 2.3 0.7 1.8 0.6 11.5 1.9 0.0 Delay (s)49.8 38.0 33.2 35.5 21.7 25.8 49.8 42.9 40.2 49.8 31.3 21.6 Level of Service DDCDCCDDDDCC Approach Delay (s)37.6 27.1 42.3 37.9 Approach LOS DCDD Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 33.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 102.9 Sum of lost time (s)15.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 202 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Fallon Road & Silvera Ranch Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 10 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)4 102 44 595 659 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1617 1770 5085 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1617 1770 5085 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Adj. Flow (vph)5 138 59 804 891 9 RTOR Reduction (vph) 124 00004 Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 0 59 804 891 5 Turn Type NA Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.6 3.2 32.9 25.7 25.7 Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 3.2 32.9 25.7 25.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.07 0.70 0.55 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 159 121 3575 2792 869 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.03 0.16 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.49 0.22 0.32 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 19.2 21.0 2.5 5.8 4.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 3.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Delay (s)19.4 24.1 2.5 5.9 4.8 Level of Service B C A A A Approach Delay (s) 19.4 4.0 5.9 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.0 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.31 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 46.8 Sum of lost time (s)13.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 203 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Camino Tassajara & Windemere Parkway 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 11 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)24 400 570 221 769 390 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 0.97 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 2787 3433 3539 3361 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 2787 3433 3539 3361 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)26 435 620 240 836 424 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 99 0 0 45 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 336 620 240 1215 0 Turn Type NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 1.6 36.2 21.1 67.2 42.1 Effective Green, g (s) 1.6 36.2 21.1 67.2 42.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.39 0.22 0.72 0.45 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)30 1074 771 2533 1507 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.12 c0.18 0.07 c0.36 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.87 0.31 0.80 0.09 0.81 Uniform Delay, d1 46.0 20.2 34.4 4.1 22.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 105.7 0.1 5.8 0.1 4.7 Delay (s)151.7 20.2 40.2 4.1 27.1 Level of Service F C D A C Approach Delay (s) 27.6 30.1 27.1 Approach LOS C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 28.2 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 93.9 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 204 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Crow Canyon Road/Blackhawk Road & Camino Tassajara 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)87 353 49 298 599 82 153 609 213 47 509 114 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 4990 3475 3433 3373 1441 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 4990 3475 3433 3373 1441 3433 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)95 384 53 324 651 89 166 662 232 51 553 124 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 43 0 11 0 0 2 135 0 0 87 Lane Group Flow (vph) 95 384 10 324 729 0 166 683 74 51 553 37 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.5 15.6 15.6 14.9 26.0 6.3 28.1 28.1 1.6 23.4 23.4 Effective Green, g (s) 4.5 15.6 15.6 14.9 26.0 6.3 28.1 28.1 1.6 23.4 23.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.33 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.02 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 195 697 312 939 1141 273 1197 511 69 1046 468 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.11 0.06 c0.21 c0.05 c0.20 0.01 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.05 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.55 0.03 0.35 0.64 0.61 0.57 0.15 0.74 0.53 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 36.2 28.6 25.7 27.9 22.6 35.3 20.7 17.4 38.6 23.3 20.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.2 0.1 0.1 1.3 2.6 0.8 0.2 29.5 0.6 0.1 Delay (s)36.9 29.8 25.8 28.0 23.9 37.9 21.5 17.6 68.1 23.9 20.2 Level of Service DCCCC DCBECC Approach Delay (s)30.7 25.2 23.3 26.4 Approach LOS CCCC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 25.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 79.2 Sum of lost time (s)15.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 205 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Santa Rita Road & I-580 EB off-ramp/Pimlico Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)256 325 590 453 0 409 0 946 963 22 94 1207 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 4.0 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.88 0.95 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 3539 2787 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 3539 2787 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)275 349 634 487 0 440 0 1017 1035 24 101 1298 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 473 0 0 48 0 0 511 0 0 582 Lane Group Flow (vph) 275 349 161 487 0 392 0 1017 524 24 101 716 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot custom NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 3 8 7 5 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.2 24.7 24.7 15.9 35.9 41.9 41.9 3.0 48.9 48.9 Effective Green, g (s) 12.2 24.7 24.7 15.9 31.4 41.9 41.9 3.0 48.9 48.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.24 0.24 0.15 0.30 0.40 0.40 0.03 0.47 0.47 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 400 439 373 521 835 1415 1114 51 1651 739 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.19 c0.14 c0.14 0.29 0.01 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.19 c0.45 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.79 0.43 0.93 0.47 0.72 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.97 Uniform Delay, d1 44.5 37.7 34.1 43.9 29.9 26.5 23.2 50.1 15.3 27.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.9 9.0 0.3 23.9 0.2 1.8 0.3 2.5 0.0 25.3 Delay (s)48.4 46.7 34.4 67.8 30.1 28.3 23.6 52.6 15.4 52.5 Level of Service D D C E C C C D B D Approach Delay (s)40.8 49.9 25.9 49.9 Approach LOS DDCD Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 39.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 104.8 Sum of lost time (s)19.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 206 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Santa Rita Road/Tassajara Road & I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 346 0 373 0 2237 677 0 923 1147 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.91 0.86 0.86 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.97 0.94 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 4908 4522 1362 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 4908 4522 1362 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 360 0 389 0 2330 705 0 961 1247 RTOR Reduction (vph)000001308300179209 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 360 0 376 0 2952 0 0 1406 414 Turn Type Prot custom NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s)10.4 10.4 43.1 43.1 43.1 Effective Green, g (s)10.4 10.4 43.1 43.1 43.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.67 0.67 0.67 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)551 447 3264 3008 906 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.60 0.31 v/s Ratio Perm c0.14 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.84 0.90 0.47 0.46 Uniform Delay, d1 25.5 26.4 9.1 5.3 5.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 12.9 4.0 0.1 0.4 Delay (s)27.6 39.3 13.1 5.4 5.6 Level of Service C D B A A Approach Delay (s)0.0 33.7 13.1 5.4 Approach LOS A C B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.8 Sum of lost time (s)11.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 207 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)670 1893 509 253 259 76 463 1039 899 267 985 242 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.88 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.86 0.88 0.97 0.86 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 6408 2787 3433 6408 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 6408 2787 3433 6408 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)691 1952 525 261 267 78 477 1071 927 275 1015 249 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 19 0 0 54 0 0 280 0 0 173 Lane Group Flow (vph) 691 1952 506 261 267 24 477 1071 647 275 1015 76 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 52316 38 74 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 50.0 66.0 16.0 46.0 46.0 16.0 47.0 47.0 15.0 46.0 46.0 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 50.0 66.0 16.0 46.0 46.0 16.0 47.0 47.0 15.0 46.0 46.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.33 0.44 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.31 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 458 1695 1226 532 1559 485 532 2008 873 343 1965 855 v/s Ratio Prot c0.20 c0.38 0.04 0.05 0.05 c0.10 0.17 0.08 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.02 c0.23 0.03 v/c Ratio 1.51 1.15 0.41 0.49 0.17 0.05 0.90 0.53 0.74 0.80 0.52 0.09 Uniform Delay, d1 65.0 50.0 28.7 63.2 38.1 36.6 66.2 42.5 46.1 66.0 42.8 37.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 240.0 75.5 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 17.2 1.0 5.6 12.0 1.0 0.2 Delay (s)305.0 125.5 28.8 63.4 38.1 36.6 83.4 43.5 51.7 78.0 43.8 37.3 Level of Service F F C E D D F D D E D D Approach Delay (s)148.7 48.8 54.2 48.9 Approach LOS F D D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 91.2 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s)16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 208 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Tassajara Road & Gleason Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)514 304 39 150 67 89 104 1542 275 143 1087 167 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 3433 3237 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 3433 3237 3433 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Adj. Flow (vph)619 366 47 181 81 107 125 1858 331 172 1310 201 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 39 0 96 0 0 0 91 0 0 78 Lane Group Flow (vph) 619 366 8 181 92 0 125 1858 240 172 1310 123 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 20.9 20.9 11.1 12.5 7.9 55.8 55.8 11.5 59.4 59.4 Effective Green, g (s) 19.5 20.9 20.9 11.1 12.5 7.9 55.8 55.8 11.5 59.4 59.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.47 0.47 0.10 0.50 0.50 Clearance Time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 4.5 4.5 2.5 4.5 2.5 4.0 4.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 564 624 279 321 341 229 1665 745 172 1772 793 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 c0.10 0.05 0.03 0.04 c0.52 c0.10 c0.37 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.15 0.08 v/c Ratio 1.10 0.59 0.03 0.56 0.27 0.55 1.12 0.32 1.00 0.74 0.16 Uniform Delay, d1 49.5 44.9 40.5 51.4 48.9 53.6 31.4 19.6 53.5 23.5 16.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 67.3 1.9 0.1 1.8 0.7 2.1 61.1 0.3 68.6 1.8 0.1 Delay (s)116.9 46.8 40.5 53.3 49.6 55.7 92.5 19.9 122.2 25.2 16.1 Level of Service F DDDD EFBFCB Approach Delay (s)88.5 51.4 80.1 34.1 Approach LOS F D F C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 65.4 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.04 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 118.6 Sum of lost time (s)19.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 209 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Fallon Road/Camino Tassajara & Tassajara Road/Syrah Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)854 1 182 5 2 0 58 553 2 0 376 405 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 0.94 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)4990 3539 1583 1770 1863 1770 3539 1583 3539 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)4990 3539 1583 1770 1863 1770 3539 1583 3539 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)918 1 196 5 2 0 62 595 2 0 404 435 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 130 00000100307 Lane Group Flow (vph) 918 1 66 5 2 0 62 595 1 0 404 128 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.1 22.0 22.0 1.3 1.2 5.0 28.8 28.8 19.2 19.2 Effective Green, g (s) 22.1 22.0 22.0 1.3 1.2 5.0 28.8 28.8 19.2 19.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.44 0.44 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1689 1192 533 35 34 136 1561 698 1041 819 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.00 c0.00 0.00 0.04 c0.17 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.00 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.00 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.46 0.38 0.00 0.39 0.16 Uniform Delay, d1 17.5 14.4 15.0 31.5 31.5 28.8 12.3 10.2 18.4 17.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.0 0.1 2.6 1.0 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Delay (s)18.0 14.4 15.1 34.0 32.5 29.7 12.3 10.2 18.7 17.2 Level of Service B B B C C C B B B B Approach Delay (s)17.5 33.6 14.0 17.9 Approach LOS B C B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 16.8 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.3 Sum of lost time (s)8.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 210 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Camino Tassajara & Highland Road 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph)10 103 674 59 235 234 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.88 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1627 3497 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1627 3497 1770 3539 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)11 108 709 62 247 246 RTOR Reduction (vph) 102 0 14 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 17 0 757 0 247 246 Turn Type NA NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 16.6 8.3 28.9 Effective Green, g (s) 2.4 16.6 8.3 28.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.40 0.20 0.70 Clearance Time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)95 1406 356 2476 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.22 c0.14 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.18 0.54 0.69 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 18.5 9.4 15.3 2.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 1.5 4.7 0.1 Delay (s)18.9 10.9 20.0 2.1 Level of Service B B B A Approach Delay (s) 18.9 10.9 11.1 Approach LOS B B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 41.3 Sum of lost time (s)14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 211 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: El Charro Road & I-580 EB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)264 0 798 00001663 949 0 739 602 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.97 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 4677 1362 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 4677 1362 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)293 0 887 00001848 1054 0 821 669 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 186 0000590000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 293 0 701 00002190 653 0 821 669 Turn Type custom custom NA Free NA Free Protected Phases 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 14.3 14.3 27.7 50.0 27.7 50.0 Effective Green, g (s) 14.3 14.3 27.7 50.0 27.7 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.55 1.00 0.55 1.00 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 982 797 2591 1362 2817 1583 v/s Ratio Prot c0.47 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 c0.25 0.48 0.42 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.88 0.85 0.48 0.29 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 13.9 17.0 9.4 0.0 5.9 0.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.79 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 10.8 3.6 1.2 0.2 0.8 Delay (s)14.0 27.8 13.0 1.2 4.9 0.8 Level of Service B C B A A A Approach Delay (s)24.4 0.0 10.3 3.0 Approach LOS C A B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.0 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 212 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: El Charro Road/Fallon Road & I-580 WB on-ramp/I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 380 102 27 0 1754 34 0 1008 342 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)3.5 3.5 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.91 1.00 0.86 0.86 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.99 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1681 1720 2787 5085 1583 4777 1362 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1681 1720 2787 5085 1583 4777 1362 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 422 113 30 0 1949 38 0 1120 380 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000300008127 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 266 269 27 0 1949 38 0 1158 207 Turn Type Perm NA custom NA Free NA Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 1 8 Free 6 Actuated Green, G (s)11.5 11.5 16.1 26.4 50.0 31.0 31.0 Effective Green, g (s)11.5 11.5 16.1 26.4 50.0 31.0 31.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.32 0.53 1.00 0.62 0.62 Clearance Time (s)3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)387 396 897 2685 1583 2962 844 v/s Ratio Prot c0.38 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.16 0.01 0.02 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.68 0.03 0.73 0.02 0.39 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1 17.6 17.6 11.6 9.0 0.0 4.8 4.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.0 3.6 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.4 0.7 Delay (s)21.6 21.2 11.6 5.4 0.0 5.2 4.9 Level of Service C C B A A A A Approach Delay (s)0.0 20.9 5.3 5.1 Approach LOS A C A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 7.4 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.0 Sum of lost time (s)7.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 213 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)94 2486 0 1099 0 0 0 1715 0 0 198 694 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.3 4.9 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.94 0.91 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 4990 5085 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 5085 4990 5085 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)99 2617 0 1157 0 0 0 1805 0 0 208 731 RTOR Reduction (vph)0000000000056 Lane Group Flow (vph) 99 2617 0 1157 0 0 0 1805 0 0 208 675 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 8462 Actuated Green, G (s) 90.7 58.1 27.7 39.0 37.7 128.4 Effective Green, g (s) 90.7 58.1 27.7 39.0 37.7 128.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.42 0.20 0.28 0.27 0.92 Clearance Time (s)5.3 4.9 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2240 2125 994 1427 1379 1583 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.51 c0.23 c0.35 0.04 0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.04 1.23 1.16 1.26 0.15 0.43 Uniform Delay, d1 8.6 40.5 55.6 50.0 38.5 0.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 108.5 85.0 124.9 0.2 0.1 Delay (s)8.6 149.0 140.6 174.9 38.7 0.7 Level of Service A F F F D A Approach Delay (s)143.8 140.6 174.9 9.1 Approach LOS F F F A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 132.7 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.23 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 139.0 Sum of lost time (s)14.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 113.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 214 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Fallon Road & Silvera Ranch Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 10 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)9 72 61 595 481 44 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1630 1770 5085 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1630 1770 5085 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Adj. Flow (vph)12 97 82 804 650 59 RTOR Reduction (vph) 87 000029 Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 0 82 804 650 30 Turn Type NA Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.5 3.8 29.9 22.1 22.1 Effective Green, g (s) 4.5 3.8 29.9 22.1 22.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.09 0.68 0.51 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 168 154 3479 2572 801 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.05 c0.16 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.53 0.23 0.25 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 19.1 2.6 6.1 5.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 3.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 Delay (s)18.0 22.6 2.7 6.2 5.5 Level of Service B C A A A Approach Delay (s) 18.0 4.5 6.2 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.23 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 43.7 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 215 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Camino Tassajara & Windemere Parkway 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 11 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)103 315 366 581 147 47 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 0.97 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 2787 3433 3539 3411 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 2787 3433 3539 3411 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)112 342 398 632 160 51 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 249 0 0 22 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 93 398 632 189 0 Turn Type NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 6.0 21.4 12.0 53.0 37.0 Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 21.4 12.0 53.0 37.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.27 0.15 0.68 0.47 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 135 761 525 2392 1610 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.03 c0.12 c0.18 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.83 0.12 0.76 0.26 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 35.7 21.4 31.8 5.0 11.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 31.2 0.0 5.5 0.3 0.1 Delay (s)66.9 21.5 37.3 5.3 11.7 Level of Service E C D A B Approach Delay (s) 32.7 17.7 11.7 Approach LOS C B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.38 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 78.4 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 216 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Crow Canyon Road/Blackhawk Road & Camino Tassajara 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)189 1264 79 109 472 28 120 685 522 180 547 166 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 4990 3510 3433 3298 1441 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 4990 3510 3433 3298 1441 3433 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)205 1374 86 118 513 30 130 745 567 196 595 180 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 44 0400172600121 Lane Group Flow (vph) 205 1374 42 118 539 0 130 892 377 196 595 59 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.9 39.8 39.8 3.0 34.9 7.4 34.9 34.9 6.0 33.5 33.5 Effective Green, g (s) 7.9 39.8 39.8 3.0 34.9 7.4 34.9 34.9 6.0 33.5 33.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.03 0.34 0.07 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 264 1371 613 146 1193 247 1121 490 201 1154 516 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.39 c0.02 0.15 0.04 c0.27 c0.06 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.26 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.78 1.00 0.07 0.81 0.45 0.53 0.80 0.77 0.98 0.52 0.11 Uniform Delay, d1 46.5 31.5 19.8 49.6 26.4 46.0 30.7 30.3 48.3 28.0 24.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.2 24.8 0.1 25.6 0.4 0.9 4.2 7.6 55.6 0.5 0.1 Delay (s)58.8 56.3 19.9 75.2 26.8 46.9 34.9 37.8 103.9 28.5 24.3 Level of Service EEBEC DCDFCC Approach Delay (s)54.7 35.5 36.8 43.0 Approach LOS DDDD Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 44.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 102.7 Sum of lost time (s)13.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 217 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) APPENDIX A3 Cumulative Conditions 6-Lane Scenario 4.2.e Packet Pg. 218 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Santa Rita Road & I-580 EB off-ramp/Pimlico Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)727 194 953 192 0 416 0 832 415 172 1078 589 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 4.0 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.88 0.95 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 3539 2787 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 3539 2787 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)782 209 1025 206 0 447 0 895 446 185 1159 633 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 12 0 0 42 0 0 314 0 0 382 Lane Group Flow (vph) 782 209 1013 206 0 405 0 895 132 185 1159 251 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot custom NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 3 8 7 5 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.8 40.5 40.5 4.5 17.2 29.7 29.7 6.0 39.7 39.7 Effective Green, g (s) 33.8 40.5 40.5 4.5 17.2 29.7 29.7 6.0 39.7 39.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.40 0.40 0.04 0.17 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.40 0.40 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1160 755 641 154 479 1051 828 106 1405 628 v/s Ratio Prot 0.23 0.11 c0.06 0.15 0.25 c0.10 c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm c0.64 0.05 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.28 1.58 1.34 0.85 0.85 0.16 1.75 0.82 0.40 Uniform Delay, d1 28.4 19.9 29.8 47.8 40.1 33.1 25.9 47.0 27.0 21.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.46 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.1 268.2 189.1 12.4 8.7 0.4 352.7 2.7 0.9 Delay (s)29.6 20.0 298.0 236.9 52.5 41.8 26.4 399.8 21.5 32.3 Level of Service C C F F D D C F C C Approach Delay (s)165.1 110.7 36.6 60.4 Approach LOS F F D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 95.8 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.24 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s)13.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 219 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Santa Rita Road/Tassajara Road & I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 1335 0 494 0 1486 588 0 550 2008 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.91 0.86 0.86 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.90 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 4869 4333 1362 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 4869 4333 1362 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 1391 0 515 0 1548 612 0 573 2183 RTOR Reduction (vph)000001107100342584 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1391 0 504 0 2089 0 0 1323 507 Turn Type Prot custom NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s)42.2 42.2 46.5 46.5 46.5 Effective Green, g (s)42.2 42.2 46.5 46.5 46.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.46 0.46 0.46 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)1449 1176 2264 2015 633 v/s Ratio Prot c0.41 c0.43 0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.43 0.92 1.05dr 0.80 Uniform Delay, d1 28.1 20.4 25.1 20.6 22.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.9 0.1 5.3 1.7 10.3 Delay (s)42.9 20.5 25.8 22.3 33.1 Level of Service D C C C C Approach Delay (s)0.0 36.9 25.8 26.6 Approach LOS A D C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 29.2 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s)11.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 220 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)160 232 174 788 680 86 372 1011 291 82 1462 394 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.88 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.86 0.88 0.97 0.86 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 6408 2787 3433 6408 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 6408 2787 3433 6408 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)165 239 179 812 701 89 384 1042 300 85 1507 406 RTOR Reduction (vph)00400720018500221 Lane Group Flow (vph) 165 239 175 812 701 17 384 1042 115 85 1507 185 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 52316 38 74 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 16.0 32.2 24.6 24.6 24.6 16.2 48.0 48.0 15.0 46.8 46.8 Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 16.0 32.2 24.6 24.6 24.6 16.2 48.0 48.0 15.0 46.8 46.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.26 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.13 0.38 0.38 0.12 0.37 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 437 648 715 977 996 310 644 2449 1065 410 2388 1038 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.05 0.03 c0.16 c0.14 c0.08 0.16 0.02 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.37 0.25 0.83 0.70 0.06 0.60 0.43 0.11 0.21 0.63 0.18 Uniform Delay, d1 50.2 50.2 37.1 48.5 47.1 41.1 51.6 28.6 25.0 49.9 32.3 26.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.4 0.1 5.8 2.3 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 1.3 0.4 Delay (s)50.4 50.5 37.1 54.3 49.4 41.1 52.6 29.2 25.2 50.0 33.6 26.8 Level of Service DDDDDDDCCDCC Approach Delay (s)46.4 51.4 33.7 32.9 Approach LOS DDCC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 39.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 125.6 Sum of lost time (s)16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 221 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Tassajara Road & Gleason Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)83 111 16 423 609 312 120 902 211 187 1416 827 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 3433 3359 3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 3433 3359 3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Adj. Flow (vph)100 134 19 510 734 376 145 1087 254 225 1706 996 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 14 0 45 0 0 0 169 0 0 83 Lane Group Flow (vph) 100 134 5 510 1065 0 145 1087 85 225 1706 913 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.3 36.6 36.6 17.5 48.8 5.5 48.5 48.5 22.7 65.7 65.7 Effective Green, g (s) 5.3 36.6 36.6 17.5 48.8 5.5 48.5 48.5 22.7 65.7 65.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.25 0.25 0.12 0.34 0.04 0.34 0.34 0.16 0.45 0.45 Clearance Time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 4.5 4.5 2.5 4.5 2.5 4.0 4.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 126 896 401 415 1134 131 1706 531 278 2310 719 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.04 c0.15 c0.32 c0.04 0.21 0.13 0.34 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.05 c0.58 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.15 0.01 1.23 0.94 1.11 0.64 0.16 0.81 0.74 1.27 Uniform Delay, d1 69.1 41.9 40.5 63.5 46.5 69.5 40.6 33.7 58.9 32.4 39.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 27.3 0.1 0.0 122.6 14.6 110.2 0.9 0.2 15.4 1.4 132.0 Delay (s)96.4 42.1 40.5 186.1 61.1 179.7 41.5 33.9 74.2 33.7 171.4 Level of Service F D D F E F D C E C F Approach Delay (s)63.4 100.4 53.7 83.7 Approach LOS E F D F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 80.1 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 144.6 Sum of lost time (s)14.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 222 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Fallon Road/Camino Tassajara & Tassajara Road/Syrah Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)411 1 64 3 2 0 128 550 92 0 531 994 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 0.94 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)4990 3539 1583 1770 1863 1770 3539 1583 3539 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)4990 3539 1583 1770 1863 1770 3539 1583 3539 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)442 1 69 3 2 0 138 591 99 0 571 1069 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 55 000003900644 Lane Group Flow (vph) 442 1 14 3 2 0 138 591 60 0 571 425 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.9 15.7 15.7 1.5 1.3 11.2 46.3 46.3 30.5 30.5 Effective Green, g (s) 15.9 15.7 15.7 1.5 1.3 11.2 46.3 46.3 30.5 30.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.40 Clearance Time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1034 724 324 35 32 258 2136 956 1407 1108 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.00 c0.00 0.00 c0.08 0.17 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.04 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.06 0.53 0.28 0.06 0.41 0.38 Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 24.3 24.5 36.9 37.1 30.3 7.2 6.3 16.6 16.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 0.1 1.4 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 Delay (s)26.8 24.3 24.6 38.4 38.2 31.4 7.3 6.3 16.9 16.7 Level of Service CCCDD CAA BB Approach Delay (s)26.5 38.3 11.2 16.8 Approach LOS C D B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 16.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.40 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 76.7 Sum of lost time (s)13.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 223 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Camino Tassajara & Highland Road 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph)135 183 254 3 44 830 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1682 3533 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1682 3533 1770 3539 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)142 193 267 3 46 874 RTOR Reduction (vph) 143 01000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 0 269 0 46 874 Turn Type NA NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 8.0 13.9 1.8 19.7 Effective Green, g (s) 8.0 13.9 1.8 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.37 0.05 0.52 Clearance Time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 357 1303 85 1849 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.08 0.03 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.54 0.21 0.54 0.47 Uniform Delay, d1 13.2 8.1 17.5 5.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.4 3.7 0.9 Delay (s)14.0 8.5 21.3 6.6 Level of Service B A C A Approach Delay (s) 14.0 8.5 7.3 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.0 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 37.7 Sum of lost time (s)10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 224 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: El Charro Road & I-580 EB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)427 0 208 000025763601720 734 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 4407 1362 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 4407 1362 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)474 0 231 000028670701911 816 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 16 00001330000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 474 0 215 000050735301911 816 Turn Type custom custom NA Free NA Free Protected Phases 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 10.8 10.8 31.2 50.0 31.2 50.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.8 10.8 31.2 50.0 31.2 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.62 1.00 0.62 1.00 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 742 602 2750 1362 3173 1583 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.08 0.26 c0.52 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.36 0.18 0.26 0.60 0.52 Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 16.6 4.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.8 1.2 Delay (s)19.2 16.8 4.1 0.5 5.8 1.2 Level of Service B B A A A A Approach Delay (s)18.4 0.0 2.8 4.4 Approach LOS BAAA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.3 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.0 Sum of lost time (s)4.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 225 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: El Charro Road/Fallon Road & I-580 WB on-ramp/I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 222 11 75 0 578 74 0 735 1292 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)3.5 3.5 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.91 1.00 0.86 0.86 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.93 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1681 1693 2787 5085 1583 4469 1362 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1681 1693 2787 5085 1583 4469 1362 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 247 12 83 0 642 82 0 817 1436 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000660000223223 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 128 131 17 0 642 82 0 1312 495 Turn Type Perm NA custom NA Free NA Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 1 8 Free 6 Actuated Green, G (s)8.0 8.0 14.0 29.0 50.0 34.5 34.5 Effective Green, g (s)8.0 8.0 10.5 29.0 50.0 34.5 34.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.21 0.58 1.00 0.69 0.69 Clearance Time (s)3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)269 271 585 2949 1583 3084 940 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.08 0.01 0.05 c0.36 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.22 0.05 0.43 0.53 Uniform Delay, d1 19.1 19.1 15.7 5.0 0.0 3.4 3.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.22 7.72 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 1.7 Delay (s)19.6 19.6 15.7 2.9 0.1 1.1 30.9 Level of Service B B B A A A C Approach Delay (s)0.0 18.7 2.5 10.6 Approach LOS ABAB Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.7 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.0 Sum of lost time (s)7.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 226 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)44 633 199 782 984 826 67 259 263 544 1007 72 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.3 4.9 4.9 5.3 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.88 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 0.88 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 5085 2787 3433 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 5085 2787 3433 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)46 666 209 823 1036 869 71 273 277 573 1060 76 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 141 0 0 386 0 0 234 0 0 34 Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 666 68 823 1036 483 71 273 43 573 1060 42 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 8462 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.5 22.3 22.3 23.0 41.8 41.8 3.5 15.4 15.4 19.8 31.7 35.2 Effective Green, g (s) 3.5 22.3 22.3 23.0 41.8 41.8 3.5 15.4 15.4 19.8 31.7 35.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.42 0.42 0.04 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.32 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 5.3 4.9 4.9 5.3 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 120 1134 622 1148 2126 662 175 783 429 680 1612 557 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.13 c0.16 0.20 0.01 0.05 c0.17 c0.21 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.30 0.02 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.59 0.11 0.72 0.49 0.73 0.41 0.35 0.10 0.84 0.66 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 47.2 34.7 30.9 35.5 21.3 24.4 47.2 37.8 36.3 38.6 29.5 21.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.75 1.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.9 0.1 1.8 0.2 4.3 0.6 1.2 0.5 9.0 2.1 0.0 Delay (s)47.9 35.7 31.1 37.3 21.5 28.7 43.0 29.6 57.9 47.6 31.6 21.6 Level of Service DDCDCCDCEDCC Approach Delay (s)35.2 28.5 43.8 36.5 Approach LOS DCDD Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 33.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s)10.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 227 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Fallon Road & Silvera Ranch Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 10 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)4 101 45 651 606 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1617 1770 5085 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1617 1770 5085 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Adj. Flow (vph)5 136 61 880 819 8 RTOR Reduction (vph) 122 00004 Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 0 61 880 819 4 Turn Type NA Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.6 3.2 31.6 24.4 24.4 Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 3.2 31.6 24.4 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.07 0.69 0.54 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 163 124 3532 2727 849 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.03 0.17 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.49 0.25 0.30 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 18.6 20.4 2.6 5.8 4.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 3.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Delay (s)18.7 23.4 2.6 6.0 4.9 Level of Service B C A A A Approach Delay (s) 18.7 4.0 6.0 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 5.9 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.29 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 45.5 Sum of lost time (s)13.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 228 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Camino Tassajara & Windemere Parkway 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 11 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)16 401 591 238 765 238 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 0.97 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 2787 3433 3539 3413 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 2787 3433 3539 3413 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)17 436 642 259 832 259 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 92 0 0 20 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 17 344 642 259 1071 0 Turn Type NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 0.7 36.6 21.7 67.3 41.6 Effective Green, g (s) 0.7 36.6 21.7 67.3 41.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.01 0.39 0.23 0.72 0.45 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)13 1098 802 2564 1528 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.12 c0.19 0.07 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 1.31 0.31 0.80 0.10 0.70 Uniform Delay, d1 46.1 19.5 33.6 3.8 20.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 363.0 0.1 5.4 0.1 2.7 Delay (s)409.1 19.5 39.0 3.9 23.3 Level of Service F B D A C Approach Delay (s) 34.1 28.9 23.3 Approach LOS C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 27.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 92.9 Sum of lost time (s)18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 229 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Crow Canyon Road/Blackhawk Road & Camino Tassajara 3/18/2015 Cumulative AM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 2-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)73 347 35 384 671 126 108 590 239 59 457 89 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 4990 3455 3433 3370 1441 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 4990 3455 3433 3370 1441 3433 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)79 377 38 417 729 137 117 641 260 64 497 97 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 31 0 15 0 0 3 157 0 0 69 Lane Group Flow (vph) 79 377 7 417 851 0 117 664 77 64 497 28 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.7 15.7 15.7 17.5 29.5 5.3 26.9 26.9 2.2 23.8 23.8 Effective Green, g (s) 3.7 15.7 15.7 17.5 29.5 5.3 26.9 26.9 2.2 23.8 23.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.19 0.19 0.22 0.36 0.07 0.33 0.33 0.03 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 156 683 306 1074 1254 224 1115 477 93 1036 463 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.11 0.08 c0.25 c0.03 c0.20 0.02 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.05 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.55 0.02 0.39 0.68 0.52 0.60 0.16 0.69 0.48 0.06 Uniform Delay, d1 37.9 29.6 26.6 27.3 21.9 36.8 22.7 19.2 39.2 23.7 20.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 1.2 0.0 0.1 1.6 1.0 1.0 0.2 15.5 0.5 0.1 Delay (s)38.9 30.8 26.6 27.4 23.5 37.8 23.7 19.5 54.7 24.1 20.8 Level of Service DCCCC DCBDCC Approach Delay (s)31.8 24.8 24.3 26.6 Approach LOS CCCC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 26.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 81.3 Sum of lost time (s)20.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 230 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Santa Rita Road & I-580 EB off-ramp/Pimlico Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)285 330 611 438 0 426 0 1007 936 20 86 1213 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 4.0 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.88 0.95 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 3539 2787 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 1863 1583 3433 2787 3539 2787 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)306 355 657 471 0 458 0 1083 1006 22 92 1304 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 452 0 0 44 0 0 590 0 0 587 Lane Group Flow (vph) 306 355 205 471 0 414 0 1083 416 22 92 717 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot custom NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 3 8 7 5 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.8 24.8 24.8 13.7 20.8 36.1 36.1 6.1 46.2 46.2 Effective Green, g (s) 23.8 24.8 24.8 13.7 20.8 36.1 36.1 6.1 46.2 46.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.14 0.21 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.46 0.46 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.4 4.5 5.4 5.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 817 462 393 470 580 1278 1006 108 1635 731 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.19 c0.14 0.15 0.31 0.01 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.15 c0.45 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.77 0.52 1.00 0.71 0.85 0.41 0.20 0.06 0.98 Uniform Delay, d1 31.9 34.9 32.5 43.1 36.8 29.4 24.0 44.6 14.9 26.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.21 0.86 1.92 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 6.8 0.6 42.0 3.5 7.1 1.3 0.3 0.1 27.3 Delay (s)32.0 41.7 33.1 85.2 40.3 36.5 25.2 54.1 12.9 78.2 Level of Service C D C F D D C D B E Approach Delay (s)35.1 63.1 31.1 73.6 Approach LOS D E C E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 47.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s)9.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 231 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Santa Rita Road/Tassajara Road & I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 337 0 515 0 2351 677 0 930 1147 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.91 0.86 0.86 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.97 0.94 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 4915 4524 1362 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 4915 4524 1362 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 351 0 536 0 2449 705 0 969 1247 RTOR Reduction (vph)000001005100115196 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 351 0 526 0 3103 0 0 1478 427 Turn Type Prot custom NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s)20.2 20.2 68.5 68.5 68.5 Effective Green, g (s)20.2 20.2 68.5 68.5 68.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.68 0.68 0.68 Clearance Time (s)5.4 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)693 563 3367 3099 933 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.63 0.33 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.31 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.93 0.92 0.48 0.46 Uniform Delay, d1 35.5 39.2 13.5 7.4 7.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 22.4 5.1 0.5 1.6 Delay (s)35.7 61.7 15.0 7.9 8.8 Level of Service D E B A A Approach Delay (s)0.0 51.4 15.0 8.2 Approach LOS A D B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 17.8 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s)11.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 232 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)992 1844 458 315 281 155 348 1477 841 289 988 211 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.88 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.86 0.88 0.97 0.86 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 6408 2787 3433 6408 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 5085 2787 4990 5085 1583 4990 6408 2787 3433 6408 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph)1023 1901 472 325 290 160 359 1523 867 298 1019 218 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 13 0 0 111 0 0 279 0 0 151 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1023 1901 459 325 290 49 359 1523 588 298 1019 67 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 52316 38 74 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 50.0 66.0 16.0 46.0 46.0 16.0 46.2 46.2 15.8 46.0 46.0 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 50.0 66.0 16.0 46.0 46.0 16.0 46.2 46.2 15.8 46.0 46.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.33 0.44 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.31 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 458 1695 1226 532 1559 485 532 1974 858 362 1965 855 v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 c0.37 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.07 c0.24 c0.09 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.03 0.21 0.02 v/c Ratio 2.23 1.12 0.37 0.61 0.19 0.10 0.67 0.77 0.69 0.82 0.52 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 65.0 50.0 28.2 64.0 38.2 37.2 64.5 47.1 45.5 65.7 42.9 36.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 562.2 63.2 0.1 1.5 0.1 0.1 2.7 3.0 4.4 13.4 1.0 0.2 Delay (s)627.2 113.2 28.2 65.5 38.3 37.3 67.2 50.1 50.0 79.1 43.9 37.1 Level of Service F F C E D D E D D E D D Approach Delay (s)256.2 49.5 52.3 49.7 Approach LOS F D D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 133.5 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s)16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 233 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Tassajara Road & Gleason Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)391 232 24 191 80 140 105 2068 370 175 1067 154 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 3433 3201 3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 3433 3201 3433 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Adj. Flow (vph)471 280 29 230 96 169 127 2492 446 211 1286 186 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 24 0 101 0 0 0 177 0 0 105 Lane Group Flow (vph) 471 280 5 230 164 0 127 2492 269 211 1286 81 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.5 13.1 13.1 6.4 13.0 5.0 33.5 33.5 5.5 34.0 34.0 Effective Green, g (s) 6.5 13.1 13.1 6.4 13.0 5.0 33.5 33.5 5.5 34.0 34.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.17 0.06 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.44 0.44 Clearance Time (s)4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.3 5.3 4.5 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.5 4.5 4.5 2.5 4.5 2.5 4.0 4.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 287 596 267 282 535 221 2190 682 125 2222 692 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 c0.08 0.07 0.05 0.04 c0.49 c0.12 0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.17 0.05 v/c Ratio 1.64 0.47 0.02 0.82 0.31 0.57 1.14 0.40 1.69 0.58 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 35.6 29.2 27.0 35.1 28.4 35.4 22.1 15.2 36.1 16.5 13.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 303.8 1.0 0.0 16.0 0.6 2.9 68.2 0.5 341.6 0.4 0.1 Delay (s)339.4 30.2 27.0 51.2 29.0 38.3 90.4 15.7 377.8 16.9 13.1 Level of Service F CCDC DFBFBB Approach Delay (s)216.8 39.3 77.4 61.8 Approach LOS F D E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 87.9 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.8 Sum of lost time (s)14.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 234 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Fallon Road/Camino Tassajara & Tassajara Road/Syrah Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)940 1 163 5 2 0 40 525 2 0 398 383 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Lane Util. Factor 0.94 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.88 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)4990 3539 1583 1770 1863 1770 3539 1583 3539 2787 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)4990 3539 1583 1770 1863 1770 3539 1583 3539 2787 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph)1011 1 175 5 2 0 43 565 2 0 428 412 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 115 00000100291 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1011 1 60 5 2 0 43 565 1 0 428 121 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2684 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.8 22.7 22.7 1.3 1.2 4.9 29.0 29.0 19.5 19.5 Effective Green, g (s) 22.8 22.7 22.7 1.3 1.2 4.9 29.0 29.0 19.5 19.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.44 0.44 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time (s)4.6 4.6 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1719 1214 543 35 34 131 1550 693 1042 821 v/s Ratio Prot c0.20 0.00 c0.00 0.00 0.02 c0.16 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.00 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.00 0.11 0.14 0.06 0.33 0.36 0.00 0.41 0.15 Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 14.3 14.9 31.9 31.9 29.1 12.4 10.5 18.7 17.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 0.1 2.6 1.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 Delay (s)18.5 14.3 15.0 34.5 32.9 29.6 12.5 10.5 19.1 17.3 Level of Service B B B C C C B B B B Approach Delay (s)17.9 34.0 13.7 18.2 Approach LOS B C B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 17.1 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 66.2 Sum of lost time (s)8.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 235 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Camino Tassajara & Highland Road 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph)9 103 727 59 238 237 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.88 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1624 3499 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1624 3499 1770 3539 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)9 108 765 62 251 249 RTOR Reduction (vph) 102 0 13 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 15 0 814 0 251 249 Turn Type NA NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 17.1 7.8 28.9 Effective Green, g (s) 2.4 17.1 7.8 28.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.41 0.19 0.70 Clearance Time (s)4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)94 1449 334 2476 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.23 c0.14 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.16 0.56 0.75 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 18.5 9.2 15.8 2.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 1.6 8.2 0.1 Delay (s)18.8 10.8 24.0 2.1 Level of Service B B C A Approach Delay (s) 18.8 10.8 13.1 Approach LOS B B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 41.3 Sum of lost time (s)14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 236 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: El Charro Road & I-580 EB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)252 0 789 00001646 931 0 745 605 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.97 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 2787 4681 1362 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 2787 4681 1362 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)280 0 877 00001829 1034 0 828 672 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 148 0000550000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 280 0 729 00002157 651 0 828 672 Turn Type custom custom NA Free NA Free Protected Phases 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 15.5 15.5 26.5 50.0 26.5 50.0 Effective Green, g (s) 15.5 15.5 26.5 50.0 26.5 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.53 1.00 0.53 1.00 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1064 864 2481 1362 2695 1583 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.26 0.48 0.42 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.84 0.87 0.48 0.31 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 13.0 16.1 10.2 0.0 6.6 0.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 7.2 4.5 1.2 0.3 0.8 Delay (s)13.0 23.4 14.7 1.2 5.6 0.8 Level of Service B C B A A A Approach Delay (s)20.9 0.0 11.7 3.4 Approach LOS C A B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.0 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 237 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: El Charro Road/Fallon Road & I-580 WB on-ramp/I-580 WB off-ramp 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)0 0 0 366 95 0 0 1663 34 0 1037 338 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.91 1.00 0.86 0.86 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1681 1719 5085 1583 4783 1362 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1681 1719 5085 1583 4783 1362 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph)0 0 0 407 106 0 0 1848 38 0 1152 376 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000000006128 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 252 261 0 0 1848 38 0 1184 210 Turn Type Perm NA custom NA Free NA Perm Protected Phases 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 8 1 8 Free 6 Actuated Green, G (s)11.4 11.4 31.1 50.0 31.1 31.1 Effective Green, g (s)11.4 11.4 31.1 50.0 31.1 31.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.62 1.00 0.62 0.62 Clearance Time (s)3.5 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)383 392 3163 1583 2975 847 v/s Ratio Prot c0.36 0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.67 0.58 0.02 0.40 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1 17.5 17.6 5.6 0.0 4.7 4.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.20 0.03 Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 3.3 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.5 Delay (s)20.6 20.9 2.7 0.0 1.3 0.7 Level of Service C C A A A A Approach Delay (s)0.0 20.7 2.7 1.1 Approach LOS A C A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 4.4 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.0 Sum of lost time (s)7.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 238 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)20 2473 0 1133 0 0 0 1551 0 0 153 781 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)5.3 4.9 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.94 0.91 0.91 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 5085 4990 5085 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 5085 4990 5085 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph)21 2603 0 1193 0 0 0 1633 0 0 161 822 RTOR Reduction (vph)0000000000087 Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 2603 0 1193 0 0 0 1633 0 0 161 735 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 3 Permitted Phases 8462 Actuated Green, G (s) 68.7 34.1 29.7 22.0 20.7 89.4 Effective Green, g (s) 68.7 34.1 29.7 22.0 20.7 89.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.34 0.30 0.22 0.21 0.89 Clearance Time (s)5.3 4.9 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2358 1734 1482 1119 1053 1583 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.51 c0.24 c0.32 0.03 0.32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.01 1.50 0.80 1.46 0.15 0.46 Uniform Delay, d1 4.9 33.0 32.5 39.0 32.5 1.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 228.6 3.1 210.8 0.3 0.1 Delay (s)4.9 261.5 35.6 242.4 32.8 1.0 Level of Service A F D F C A Approach Delay (s)259.5 35.6 242.4 6.2 Approach LOS F D F A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 174.9 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.25 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s)14.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.8% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 239 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: Fallon Road & Silvera Ranch Drive 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 10 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)9 73 57 549 484 45 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1630 1770 5085 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1630 1770 5085 5085 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Adj. Flow (vph)12 99 77 742 654 61 RTOR Reduction (vph) 89 000030 Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 0 77 742 654 31 Turn Type NA Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.5 3.8 30.2 22.4 22.4 Effective Green, g (s) 4.5 3.8 30.2 22.4 22.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.09 0.69 0.51 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 167 153 3490 2589 806 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.04 0.15 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.50 0.21 0.25 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 18.0 19.2 2.5 6.1 5.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 Delay (s)18.1 21.8 2.6 6.2 5.4 Level of Service B C A A A Approach Delay (s) 18.1 4.4 6.1 Approach LOS B A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.27 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 44.0 Sum of lost time (s)13.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 240 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: Camino Tassajara & Windemere Parkway 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 11 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)102 309 371 634 152 45 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.88 0.97 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 2787 3433 3539 3418 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)1770 2787 3433 3539 3418 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)111 336 403 689 165 49 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 244 0 0 20 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 111 92 403 689 194 0 Turn Type NA custom Prot NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 6.0 21.4 12.0 53.0 37.0 Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 21.4 12.0 53.0 37.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.27 0.15 0.68 0.47 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 135 761 525 2392 1613 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.03 c0.12 c0.19 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.82 0.12 0.77 0.29 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 35.7 21.4 31.9 5.1 11.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 30.2 0.0 6.0 0.3 0.2 Delay (s)65.9 21.5 37.9 5.4 11.7 Level of Service E C D A B Approach Delay (s) 32.5 17.4 11.7 Approach LOS C B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.40 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 78.4 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 241 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 12: Crow Canyon Road/Blackhawk Road & Camino Tassajara 3/18/2015 Cumulative PM 5:00 pm 10/3/2014 3-Lanes Synchro 8 Report JMP Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph)185 1271 84 104 477 25 132 657 515 170 540 174 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot)3433 3539 1583 4990 3513 3433 3291 1441 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)3433 3539 1583 4990 3513 3433 3291 1441 3433 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)201 1382 91 113 518 27 143 714 560 185 587 189 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 46 0300192700128 Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 1382 45 113 542 0 143 869 359 185 587 61 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 40.1 40.1 3.0 33.4 7.5 34.5 34.5 6.0 33.0 33.0 Effective Green, g (s) 9.7 40.1 40.1 3.0 33.4 7.5 34.5 34.5 6.0 33.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.39 0.39 0.03 0.33 0.07 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.32 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.7 5.7 4.0 5.7 4.0 5.3 5.3 4.0 5.3 5.3 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 325 1383 619 146 1144 251 1107 485 201 1138 509 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.39 c0.02 0.15 0.04 c0.26 c0.05 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.25 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.62 1.00 0.07 0.77 0.47 0.57 0.78 0.74 0.92 0.52 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 44.7 31.2 19.6 49.5 27.6 46.0 30.7 30.1 48.1 28.3 24.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 23.9 0.1 20.4 0.4 1.8 3.9 6.2 41.2 0.5 0.1 Delay (s)47.1 55.1 19.7 69.9 28.0 47.8 34.6 36.3 89.3 28.8 24.7 Level of Service D E B E C D C D F C C Approach Delay (s)52.2 35.2 36.4 39.7 Approach LOS DDDD Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 42.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 102.6 Sum of lost time (s)13.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 4.2.e Packet Pg. 242 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Appendix B Roadway Segment Level of Service Analysis 4.2.e Packet Pg. 243 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Roadway Segment Segment Length (mi) Speed Limit Speed Constant Median/ Curb Cross Section Adj Access Points Access Density Lanes Access Adj Base Freeflow Speed 1 (mph) Distance between Signals Signal Spacing Adj Freeflow Speed (mph) Freeflow Travel Time (sec) Approach Peak Hour Signal delay Average Travel Time (sec) Average Speed (mph) Speed Ratio Segment LOS AM 24.8 69.6 26 65% C PM 37.8 82.6 22 55% C AM 18.4 63.2 28 70% B PM 34.9 79.7 23 57% C AM 86.2 46 100%A PM 86.2 46 100%A AM 9.0 95.2 42 91%A PM 24.8 111.0 36 78% B AM 13.2 98.5 40 86%A PM 24.5 109.8 36 78% B AM 2.5 87.8 45 97%A PM 3.3 88.6 45 97%A AM 11.8 329.2 45 97%A PM 8.0 325.4 45 97%A AM 8.0 325.4 45 97%A PM 8.4 325.8 45 97%A AM 213.9 40 99%A PM 213.9 40 99%A AM 23.7 237.6 36 89%A PM 30.5 244.4 35 87%A AM 28.0 278.8 37 89%A PM 50.8 301.6 35 84% B AM 250.8 42 101%A PM 250.8 42 101%A Existing Conditions 40.4 1600 0.9 41.62 1100 0.9 40.2 5800 1.0 45.9 5800 1.0 46.4 5 5 4 0 0 2 1 -0.3 6 -0.3 18 -0.3 0 -0.2 1 1 2 Southbound Northbound 45 46.8 -2.7 Restrictive Median, Curb Camino Tassajara between Lusitano Street and Crow Canyon Rd 2.4 43.9 213.9 Southbound Northbound 46.8 -2.7 Restrictive Median, Curb 45 Camino Tassajara between Crow Canyon Road and Sycamore Valley Road 2.9 43.9 250.80-0.2 1150 0.9 Southbound Northbound 46.8 0No Median, No Curb 21600 Tassajara Rd/Camino Tassajara between Fallon Rd and Windemere Parkway 1.1 46.5 85.3 Southbound Northbound 46.8 0 No Median, No Curb45 45 Camino Tassajara between Windemere parkway and Lusitano Street 4.1 46.5 317.41.0 46.5 Southbound Northbound 46.8 -0.5 Non- restrictive Median, Curb 5 Tassajara Rd between Gleason Dr and North Dublin Ranch Dr 0.5 43.9 44.8 Southbound Northbound 46.8 -2.7 Restrictive Median, Curb 2 -0.245 45 Tassajara Rd between North Dublin Ranch Dr and Fallon Road 1.1 46.0 86.2 4 4.2.e Packet Pg. 244 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Roadway Segment Segment Length (mi) Speed Limit Speed Constant Median/ Curb Cross Section Adj Access Points Access Density Lanes Access Adj Base Freeflow Speed 1 (mph) Distance between Signals Signal Spacing Adj Freeflow Speed (mph) Freeflow Travel Time (sec) Approach Peak Hour Signal delay Average Travel Time (sec) Segment LOS AM 34.9 79.7 C PM 25.2 70.0 C AM 44.3 89.1 D PM 92.5 137.3 E AM 86.0 A PM 86.0 A AM 7.4 93.4 A PM 12.3 98.3 A AM 18.0 103.1 B PM 18.7 103.8 B AM 4.1 89.2 A PM 5.3 90.4 A AM 35.6 352.3 A PM 13.8 330.5 A AM 10.0 326.7 A PM 10.9 327.6 A AM 213.9 A PM 213.9 A AM 23.9 237.8 A PM 26.8 240.7 A AM 29.8 280.6 A PM 56.3 307.1 B AM 250.8 A PM 250.8 A Cumulative Conditions 4‐Lane Scenario 41.6 250.8 Southbound Northbound -2.7 0 0 2 -0.2 43.9 0.9 40.4 213.9 Southbound Northbound Camino Tassajara between Crow Canyon Road and Sycamore Valley Road 2.9 45 46.8 Restrictive Median, Curb 0 0 2 -0.2 43.9 1150 Camino Tassajara between Lusitano Street and Crow Canyon Rd 2.4 45 46.8 Restrictive Median, Curb -2.7 1600 0.9 46.6 316.7 Southbound Northbound 0 18 4 2 -0.2 46.6 1.0 46.5 85.1 Southbound Northbound Camino Tassajara between Windemere parkway and Lusitano Street 4.1 45 46.8 No Median, No Curb 6 5 2 -0.2 46.6 5800 Tassajara Rd/Camino Tassajara between Fallon Rd and Windemere Parkway 1.1 45 46.8 No Median, No Curb 0 21600 1.0 46.0 86.0 Southbound Northbound -0.5 5 5 2 -0.2 46.1 0.9 40.2 44.8 Southbound Northbound Tassajara Rd between North Dublin Ranch Dr and Fallon Road 1.1 45 46.8 Non- restrictive Median, Curb 2 4 2 -0.2 43.9 1100 Tassajara Rd between Gleason Dr and North Dublin Ranch Dr 0.5 45 46.8 Restrictive Median, Curb -2.7 5800 1.0 4.2.e Packet Pg. 245 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Roadway Segment Segment Length (mi) Speed Limit Speed Constant Median/ Curb Cross Section Adj Access Points Access Density Lanes Access Adj Base Freeflow Speed 1 (mph) Distance between Signals Signal Spacing Adj Freeflow Speed (mph) Freeflow Travel Time (sec) Approach Peak Hour Signal delay Average Travel Time (sec) Average Speed (mph) Speed Ratio Segment LOS AM 33.7 78.4 23 57% C PM 16.9 61.6 29 72% B AM 41.5 86.2 21 52% C PM 90.4 135.1 13 32%E AM 85.9 46 100%A PM 85.9 46 100%A AM 7.3 93.2 42 91%A PM 12.5 98.4 40 87%A AM 16.9 101.9 39 84% B PM 19.1 104.1 38 82% B AM 3.9 88.9 45 97%A PM 5.4 90.4 44 94%A AM 29.9 346.0 43 92%A PM 13.8 329.9 45 96%A AM 8.5 324.6 45 96%A PM 10.8 326.9 45 96%A AM 213.5 40 99%A PM 213.5 40 99%A AM 23.5 237.0 36 89%A PM 28.0 241.5 36 89%A AM 30.8 281.1 37 89%A PM 55.1 305.4 34 82% B AM 250.3 42 101%A PM 250.3 42 101%A Cumulative Conditions 6‐Lane Scenario 41.7 250.3 Southbound Northbound -2.7 0 0 3 -0.1 44.0 0.9 40.5 213.5 Southbound Northbound Camino Tassajara between Crow Canyon Road and Sycamore Valley Road 2.9 45 46.8 Restrictive Median, Curb 0 0 3 -0.1 44.0 1150 Camino Tassajara between Lusitano Street and Crow Canyon Rd 2.4 45 46.8 Restrictive Median, Curb -2.7 1600 0.9 46.7 316.1 Southbound Northbound 0 18 4 3 -0.1 46.7 1.0 46.6 85.0 Southbound Northbound Camino Tassajara between Windemere parkway and Lusitano Street 4.1 45 46.8 No Median, No Curb 6 5 3 -0.1 46.7 5800 Tassajara Rd/Camino Tassajara between Fallon Rd and Windemere Parkway 1.1 45 46.8 No Median, No Curb 0 21600 1.0 46.1 85.9 Southbound Northbound -0.5 5 5 3 -0.1 46.2 0.9 40.3 44.7 Southbound Northbound Tassajara Rd between North Dublin Ranch Dr and Fallon Road 1.1 45 46.8 Non- restrictive Median, Curb 2 4 3 -0.1 44.0 1100 Tassajara Rd between Gleason Dr and North Dublin Ranch Dr 0.5 45 46.8 Restrictive Median, Curb -2.7 5800 1.0 4.2.e Packet Pg. 246 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Appendix C Lane Assumptions 4.2.e Packet Pg. 247 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Original Model Inputs (NB/SB) Modified based on Existing Conditions (NB/SB) Model Adjustment?Lane Assumptions (NB/SB) Change from Modified Existing? Lane Assumptions (NB/SB) Change from Modified Existing? Tassajara Rd/Camino Tassajara I‐580 WB Ramps to Dublin Blvd 3/3 3/3 No 3/3 No 3/3 No Dublin Blvd to Central Pkwy 2/2 2/3 Yes 2/3 No 3/3 Yes Central Pkwy to S Dublin Ranch Cir 2/2 2/2 No 2/2 No 3/3 Yes S Dublin Ranch Cir to N Dublin Ranch Cir 2/2 2/3 Yes 2/3 No 3/3 Yes N Dublin Ranch Cir to Fallon Dr 2/2 1/1 Yes 2/2 Yes 3/3 Yes Fallon Dr to Windemere Pkwy 1/1 1/1 No 2/2 Yes 3/3 Yes Windemere Pkwy to Lucitano St 1/1 1/1 No 2/2 Yes 2/2 Yes Lucitano St to Tassajara Ranch Dr 2/2 2/2 No 2/2 No 2/2 No Tassajara Ranch Dr to Crow Canyon Rd 2/2 3/3 Yes 3/3 No 3/3 No Fallon Dr I‐580 WB Ramps to Central Pkwy 1/1 2/2 Yes 3/3 Yes 3/3 No Central Pkwy to Gleason Dr 1/1 3/3 Yes 3/3 No 3/3 No Gleason Dr to Signal Hill Dr 1/1 2/2 Yes 3/3 Yes 3/3 No Signal Hill Dr to Tassajara Rd 1/1 3/3 Yes 3/3 No 3/3 No Other modifications to the model ‐ added a second centroid connector to represent Silvera Ranch Dr connecting to Tassajara Rd in addition to Fallon Rd to better model traffic assignment stemming from that residential development. Segment Existing Conditions Scenario 1 Scenario 2 4.2.e Packet Pg. 248 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a Lane Assumptions Ta s s a j a r a Rd Fa l l o n Rd Dublin Blvd Ta s s a j a r a Rd Fa l l o n Rd Dublin Blvd Original 2013 Final 2013 4.2.e Packet Pg. 249 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a Lane Assumptions (cont’d) Camino Tassajara Cr o w Ca n y o n Rd Windemere Pkwy Highland Rd Windemere Pkwy Highland Rd Cr o w Ca n y o n Rd Camino Tassajara Original 2013 Final 2013 4.2.e Packet Pg. 250 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a Lane Assumptions (cont’d) Ta s s a j a r a Rd Fa l l o n Rd Dublin Blvd Ta s s a j a r a Rd Fa l l o n Rd Dublin Blvd Scenario 1 (2040) Scenario 2 (2040) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 251 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a Lane Assumptions (cont’d) Camino Tassajara Cr o w Ca n y o n Rd Windemere Pkwy Highland Rd Windemere Pkwy Highland Rd Cr o w Ca n y o n Rd Camino Tassajara Scenario 1 (2040) Scenario 2 (2040) 4.2.e Packet Pg. 252 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a Appendix D Model Link Volumes 4.2.e Packet Pg. 253 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Link Volumes Ta s s a j a r a Rd 2013 AM 4.2.e Packet Pg. 254 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Link Volumes (cont’d) Ta s s a j a r a Rd 2013 PM 4.2.e Packet Pg. 255 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Link Volumes – AM Peak Hour Windemere Pkwy Ta s s a j a r a Rd Windemere Pkwy Ta s s a j a r a Rd Scenario 1 Scenario 2 4.2.e Packet Pg. 256 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a Link Volumes – PM Peak Hour Windemere Pkwy Ta s s a j a r a Rd Windemere Pkwy Ta s s a j a r a Rd Scenario 1 Scenario 2 4.2.e Packet Pg. 257 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a Appendix E Select‐link Analysis 4.2.e Packet Pg. 258 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 3 1 628 80 517 0 5 8 9 3 312 2475 420 248 510 168 00 170 3419 02 3112 209 1 3 4 6 7 1 561 2 00 00 17 22 5 0 1 1 3 1 1 75 03 36 470 5606 0 1 0 6 0 3 6 7 9 2 0 5890 33 188 0 0 57 35 3643 813 1 2 3 8 10 2 1 6 1 7 5 186 106 00 470 36 561 2 51 432 13 1 1 0 589 01 674 110 3373 2 1 1 2 0 7 5 24 00 02 00 63 2 7 2 05 11 35 74 625 0 0 1231 247 270 1 0 45 6 98103 0 0 577 659 132 1 0 0 00 7524 1 0 3677 63 6 8 3 668 00 2 30 3 5 2 3 00 057 3 0 139 29 676 629 0 1 0 1 2 33 0 0 1 43 0000 00 4 5 6 2 81 0 13 6 31 00 34 1 2 7 1 0 10 22 6 4 8 03 6 53 05 33 81 00 123 125220 241 46 2 561 1 036 33100 314 00 00 16 5 00 21 33 1 536 11 1522 28 00 151 00 00 00 9 50 3 0 00 0 13 5254 12 00 00 30 20 0 0 00 3047 814 10 100 00 220 1 5 1017 1541 20 8 5 1 5 2 01 00 1 25 00 264 1 1 51 1 0 81 343 75 413 684687 0 54 47 171 513 00 227 1 1 0117 92 2 46 6 1 0 14 10 2 6 0 0 3 1 00 4570 11 82 677 103 13 2 47 5 03 2 0 133 168 22 00 22 0 34 11 0 14 00 00 32 814 00 00 40 4570 4 0 5452 2413 5921 315 01 12 372 61 0 0011273 117 03 2 0 00 1 07 1 0 97 65 4 4 8 05 6 7 00 00 0 0 15 25 1 5 612 20 3423 00 3 0 0 139 77 11 4118 0 12 0 0 0 0 00 230 247 00 33 188 1837 213 13 647 1322 00 8 45 0 00 117 75 1 68 7 157 02 1 070 150 10 00 0 0 12 131 159 1 2 1 1 3 37 13 6 77 81 0 0 00 414 0 0 0 33 188 00 77 0 3718 00 03 00 1 0 02 519 10 22 10 00 00 69 3 0 05 00 0 713 00 2534 1611 156 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 5 1 00 6 1 0 0 00 0 0 3 591 2 1324 12 5602 0 0 525 1116 14 30 3 0 25 15 00 1 2 70 2 0 02 00 2 159 3 0 97 071 64 3126 1 429 01 00 2 0 4 3 0 2 916 52 0107 0 0 5 0 10 1 33 1 0 2 125 453 1498 103 02 01 00 813 01 2 0 10 5726 220 00 00 1 4 7 05 618 202400 31 1 9 90 32 00 11 5 0 0 141 71 20 9 6 6 2 00 5 2 20 251 595 04 00 88 24 1 13 0 0 1 0 665 00 09 43 74 1 0 00 05 2019 35 00 0 0 312 00 2 111 0 0 0 5 1 5 6 3 5 1 9 8 6 9 8 142 471 0 2 33 2 0 00 8 00 8 217 0 00 00 2 9 1 3 6 11 00 00 01 1 58 00 00 1 2 9 1 1 0 0 10 1 9 629 4 5 1 1 0 0 4113 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 20 6 15 02 2102 01 0 0 00 227 247 0 00 10 22 00 10 93 21 0 1 7 0 010 0 21 2 06 2 00 2416 5 00 125 77 76 12 5 23 1 67 00 0 247 227 10 2 0 0 2134 00 6 71 1 9 3 0 9 0 143 90 03 85 00 1 08 3 014 575 50 11 00 019 0 00 34 0 1 62 14 10 31 00 53 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 1 12 17 0 0 00 143 1611 20 7 0 0 00 0 6 0 0 9 8 58 872 1 1 0 21 0 0 00 32 4 1 9 8 0 1 1 0 2 1 00 0 1 055 30 20 0 6779 1 1 6 37 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 11 1 9 4 5 1 2 6 1 80 3718 14 3 1 1 58 00 532 0 0 1 2 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 14 0 0 0 0 0 00 7 13 0 0 1 40 1 02 2 7 4 0 55 0 00 0 0 6 8 3 0 1 430 6 13 111 7 7 0 0 4 0 16 0 32 0 1 0 3 014 0 23 1 10 0 5 0 13 14 8 00 03 5 3 0 10 6 8 3 0 5 9 7 0 0 63 5 0 5 352 12 1 2 7 0 0 071 00 90 159 0 427 82 01 1 0 1 7 1 7 3 7 3 1 9 60 53 1 82 332 2413 21 00 0 0 08 0 0 1 0 0 5 000 0 3 0 12 02 1 0 02 9 677 1 0 1 70 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 01 38 00 11 0 0 1 6 1 0 1 8 00 3 1 0 9 0 555 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 2 8 5 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 76 1 1 41 0 6 3 0 0 1 0 2 3 31 1 5 4 6 3 00 1 45 02 5 4 7 0 4 0 1 3 35 11 63 0 0 581 0 24 0 0 1 13 0 1928 01 0 0 1 0 251 53 4 9 00 0 0 2 8 00 0 110 0 21 3 0 0 0 0 00 2 0 71 45 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 606 12 0 0 0 6 0 00 2475 0 5 0 6 0 8 1 6 32 3 0 0 0 0 1 00 2 17 202 1 98 3 1 2 1016 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 19 2 0 20 0 0 00 00 0 0 1 2 0 103 0 0 1 55 0 10 0 0 0 00 0 0 10 103 3 00 00 0 0 62 10 1 12 1 27 0 0 0 0 00 1 0 1 17 8 88 0 0 0 12 40 0 0 00 03 5 0 1 00 00 0 0000 5 00 33 3 Camino Tassajara Capacity Analysis 0 .5 1 1.5 Miles AM Peak Hour Select-Link Analysis - Scenario 1 1,000 500 250 4.2.e Packet Pg. 259 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 2 2 98 88 913 4 6 3 2 640 3083 1 66 135 41 215 00 251 2842 10 1065 66 2 8 6 1 6 3 6318 00 00 22 1 95 1 0 1 8 1 1 47 00 152 38 1376 0 0 0 4 9 9 3 1 4 1 3 634 9448 0 0 01 193 3343 187 0 1 3 0 00 2 6 4 1 8 8 256 722 00 38 152 6318 26 384 8 463 10 165 433 5734 5 3 3 9 8 4 3 1 00 11 00 319 1 7 4 20 8 62 83 93 0 0 5106 115 171 0 1 1135 56104 0 0 527 717 53 1 0 0 00 8330 4 3 4154 58 2 5 1 529 00 5 01 6 2 0 5 00 491 0 3 4372 490 254 1 1 1 1 5 3 0 0 08 0000 00 2 3 4 2 1 42 6 26 3 62 00 34 1 11 2 0 0 01 32 5 8 6 4 7 5 45 30 49 05 00 97 106130 241 54 1863 1 215 0150 80 00 00 9 21 00 03 32 1 811 15 1114 42 00 23 00 00 00 6 05 0 1 00 0 11 4454 10 00 01 03 35 0 0 00 4628 128 00 16 00 130 4 3 78 4425 01 1 7 5 1 0 7 00 00 0 0 00 63 8 13 0 0 15 2715 10 1 16 536268 0 26 147 59 27 00 51 9 680 38 2 58 3 0 1 4 7 6 2 0 0 1 3 00 080 11 56 154 434 00 3 18 4 10 0 1 89 164 74 00 1 0 301 03 0 10 00 00 33 7 4 00 00 00 080 1 2 5444 1819 3866 99 5 00 31 437 26 0 0017632 715 10 0 2 00 1 18 0 0 85 55 2 2 5 00 1 3 1 0 00 00 0 0 113 0 6 31 8 01 3043 00 0 0 0 1 11 18 21 3235 6 31 0 0 0 0 00 141 252 00 9448 3715 8 5 32 717 1918 00 1 45 0 00 1111 12 98 2018 00 0 007142 00 00 0 0 2623 4218 0 0 5 1 7 0 2 22 81 86 0 0 00 116 0 0 0 94 48 00 18 0 3235 00 10 00 0 0 11 54 00 32 00 00 00 63 8 0 30 01 0 511 00 4430 1111 153 0 0 1 0 4 00 0 1 3 1 8 3 00 4 5 0 0 00 0 0 0 150 28 1918 11 654 0 0 1943 1412 28 25 0 1 0 00 00 1 5 00 1 1 10 00 1863 131 183 1 1 7 1 0 491 16 54 9620 2 010 11 00 0 0 4 6 0 1 929 44 004 80 0 0 2 00 2 92 4 0 280 97 1926 434154 10 00 00 187 00 0 0 0 01 4650 01 00 0 2 1 5 10 68 191500 24 1 2 58 33 00 6 14 0 0 75 0 24 00 2 5 5 5 00 3 3 01 145 239 11 00 1 2 14 3 11 0 0 1 1 563 00 11 18 73 0 0 00 10 1915 27 00 0 0 012 00 3 414 0 0 0 4 7 7 6 3 9 2 4 1 5 1 5 6 281 130 1 0 23 0 1 00 8 00 34 211 0 00 00 5 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 00 00 00 78 00 11 2 1 0 0 0 0 00 3 254 2 1 4 0 0 0 5732 33 1 53 0 0 0 0 0 03 12 11 10 281 00 0 0 00 141 252 0 00 00 23 00 10 21 11 00 2 1 1 85 0 13 0 06 28 00 2933 20 00 20 73 01 1 12 1 01 7 00 0 252 141 00 4 0 0 4329 00 163 1 29 4 1 08 00 00 9 00 611 6 00 502 01 20 00 30 0 00 18 1 01 4 7 2 00 42 00 00 00 0 0 00 8 0 0 2 1 1 31 42 0 0 00 08 1214 0 0 4 8 00 0 0 0 1 3 4 258 1 0 1 0 13 0 1 00 34 0 2 4 0 3 2 1 7 7 1 281 4 00 1 1 480 01 00 3 11499 0 2 5 15 0 0 1 0 1 01 650 0 0 0 21 2 2 2 1 2 2 00 1537 0 1 1 78 00 183 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 48 0 2426 0 0 0 0 0 00 18 13 0 0 0 00 4 10 1 3 1 27 2 42 0 00 0 48 5 2 8 0 2 5 00 145 6 3 0 0 2 14 0 56 1 0 1 6 00 0 12 1 01 0 0 1 11 4 7 00 03 0 0 00 2 5 1 0 2 4 9 0 0 1 0 0 1 11 0 5 7 0 0 11 00 00 28 0 80 273 00 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 1 8 26 2 843 1819 110 00 0 0 00 0 4 1 0 0 18 0000 0 0 2 0 31 0 0 00 0 492 0 1 0 4 7 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 3 27 00 11 0 50 4 2 0 3 00 0 7 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 1 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2325 97 0 2 01 0 0 11 1 0 0 2 19 0 1 0 3 1 7 0 1 4 0 00 0 00 0 1 6 3 8 5 4 8 1 1 2 23 57 0 0 1 0 14 0 1 1 11 10 1519 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 00 0 0 2 11 0 00 2 5 0 00 0 0 10 33 1 00 0 0 00 28 801 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 483 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 3083 2 0 0 0 7 2 10 33 4 2 0 0 0 1 00 00 01 2 56 94 0 2 78 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 17 497 0 0 0 00 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 42 1 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 00 00 0 0 00 27 0 0 0 0 0 00 4 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 9 127 0 00 00 4 8 1 0 43 00 00 00 0 1 00 1 0 6 00 94 6 Camino Tassajara Capacity Analysis 0 .5 1 1.5 Miles PM Peak Hour Select-Link Analysis - Scenario 1 750 375 188 4.2.e Packet Pg. 260 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 3 1 669 72 518 0 6 2 7 3 014 2567 420 211 510 197 00 185 3120 03 2912 192 1 3 1 7 2 8 596 1 00 00 17 22 6 0 1 1 4 1 1 65 02 34 527 5645 0 1 0 6 6 0 7 4 6 3 0 6270 31 203 0 0 67 39 3347 79 1 2 0 2 10 2 4 9 2 0 4 187 144 00 527 34 596 1 51 412 11 1 0 0 627 01 737 103 32 77 2 1 1 1 7 6 7 25 00 02 00 103 2 3 1 05 10 35 66 665 0 0 1229 210 229 0 0 46 6 10592 0 0 510 727 140 1 1 0 00 6725 9 7742 33 7 25 68 8 00 3 30 2 5 2 4 01 071 3 0 150 28 696 669 0 91 3 36 0 0 1 94 0000 00 4 2 7 3 4 9 13 5 31 00 25 1 3 5 1 0 10 22 55 8 63 4 59 06 32 81 00 114262 202 46 1 596 944 3670 219 00 00 17 5 00 11 33 1 240 13 1323 30 00 151 00 00 01 9 50 4 0 00 0 12 4758 12 00 01 30 20 0 0 00 2652 814 10 90 00 262 1 6 918 1541 20 8 5 1 0 1 01 01 1 33 00 164 1 0 51 1 0 91 363 76 416 704729 0 53 47 178 412 00 226 1 0 0157 102 2 55 8 2 0 13 11 2 5 0 0 3 1 00 6162 11 82 742 97 13 2 56 7 04 2 0 175 150 21 01 2 2 1 29 01 0 14 00 00 32 913 00 00 1 00 6162 3 0 5847 2711 5922 295 01 12 352 51 0 0011311 87 03 2 1 00 1 05 0 0 87 73 4 5 3 05 5 6 00 00 0 0 13 26 1 5 961 20 3125 00 3 0 0 141 67 11 4917 1 11 0 0 0 0 00 272 208 00 31 203 1641 213 12 714 1125 00 11 36 0 00 117 83 1 77 7 205 02 0 070 152 10 00 0 0 13 179 168 2 2 1 1 0 71 14 3 77 83 1 0 00 415 0 0 0 31 203 00 67 0 3917 00 04 00 1 0 02 522 10 23 10 00 00 59 3 0 05 00 714 00 2731 1411 146 0 0 9 2 00 1 0 8 1 5 1 00 7 0 0 0 00 0 0 2 721 2 1127 12 5902 0 0 527 1016 13 33 4 0 33 14 00 1 3 60 2 0 02 00 1 159 3 0 87 078 64 3142 1 230 01 00 0 0 4 3 0 2 916 47 0107 7 0 5 1 20 1 33 3 0 1 114 521 1978 97 02 01 00 79 01 1 0 5 20 6624 230 00 0 1 8 4 07 518 232100 33 1 7 90 32 00 9 5 0 0 141 71 00 8 5 9 3 00 5 2 20 267 616 04 00 97 22 1 120 0 0 1 3 00 42 96 1 0 00 03 2317 37 0 0 0 372 00 2 141 0 0 0 4 4 9 7 0 3 2 3 0 6 118 538 0 2 33 2 0 00 7 00 7 117 0 00 00 3 2 1 5 8 13 9 00 00 01 1 37 00 0 1 4 4 0 1 0 0 10 2 1 669 4 7 1 1 0 0 4412 2 7 0 0 0 0 10 6 13 02 294 01 0 0 00 208 0 00 1 22 00 10 82 20 0 1 1 2 0 1 4 0 11 2 062 00 2216 5 00 140 69 13 5 34 1 57 00 0 208 262 10 2 0 0 2331 00 72 8 1 7 3 2 1 01 194 120 03 8 00 98 3 012 510 70 11 00 022 0 01 31 0 1 82 13 11 56 10 62 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 12 12 18 0 0 00 194 1610 21 7 7 0 00 0 6 1 0 9 8 3 57 822 1 2 0 11 0 2 00 2 3 2 3 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 00 0 0 057 30 20 0 6778 1 1 6 41 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 11 5 1 1 6 40 4116 12 3 1 1 37 00 557 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 14 0 0 0 0 0 00 6 13 0 0 5 30 1 02 2 2 3 8 45 0 00 0 0 7 0 2 0 32 6 13 214 7 7 0 0 4 0 17 0 35 0 1 0 3 012 0 34 0 10 0 0 13 13 9 0 2 5 2 0 10 7 2 5 0 6 1 8 1 0 62 5 0 4 552 12 1 2 6 0 0 078 00 0 168 494 81 01 2 0 1 6 1 7 3 1 3 1 8 59 53 2 156 2711 21 00 0 0 07 0 1 5 000 1 2 74 0 12 03 1 0 00 11 697 0 0 1 70 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 97 0 11 0 0 1 7 1 0 1 0 7 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 8 5 0 0 0 0 5 3 1 0 0 75 2 1 21 0 5 3 0 00 2 0 3 6 9 5 5 6 2 0 1 0 6 0 4 0 4 0 1 3 37 12 65 0 0 71 0 22 0 0 14 0 1729 01 0 0 1 228 53 6 7 00 0 00 2 9 00 0 110 0 31 2 0 0 0 0 00 6362 219 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 662 11 0 0 0 6 0 176 00 2567 0 4 8 0 8 1 8 32 3 1 0 2 00 2 4 212 1 105 3 1 2 917 1 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 16 91 0 2 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 1 7 0 97 0 0 1 4 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 92 00 00 0 0 10 1 13 0 1 0 00 1 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 38 0 10 02 4 01 00 00 00 0000 3 00 31 3 Camino Tassajara Capacity Analysis 0 .5 1 1.5 Miles AM Peak Hour Select-Link Analysis - Scenario 2 750 375 188 4.2.e Packet Pg. 261 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) 2 2 99 89 913 4 6 4 2 740 3085 1 66 133 31 207 00 239 2942 00 1026 67 2 8 2 1 6 7 6421 00 00 22 2 05 1 0 1 4 1 1 46 00 151 40 1377 0 0 0 5 5 5 3 1 1 1 3 644 133 48 0 0 01 223 3339 127 0 1 2 9 00 2 5 0 1 8 2 245 725 00 40 151 6421 26 384 8 464 10 166 484 6334 5 1 3 9 8 5 3 1 00 11 00 322 1 7 6 20 8 62 85 94 0 0 6102 117 174 0 0 1135 55104 0 0 529 667 53 8 0 00 8530 4 8 5154 53 25 2 5 81 00 3 01 6 2 0 5 00 791 0 4 43 109 542 256 1 1 1 1 4 3 0 0 08 0000 00 2 4 3 8 1 32 6 25 3 52 00 34 1 01 2 0 0 01 32 57 6 4 7 6 41 30 55 06 00 93 105125 240 54 2164 1 214 0160 80 00 00 9 22 00 02 32 1 910 12 1114 31 00 23 00 00 00 6 05 0 1 00 0 11 4450 10 00 00 03 25 0 0 00 4526 128 00 16 00 125 4 3 78 4425 01 1 5 8 1 0 7 00 00 0 0 00 53 8 13 0 0 15 2615 10 1 16 587270 0 26 152 59 17 00 61 9 577 38 2 58 4 0 1 4 7 6 2 0 0 1 3 00 081 11 46 154 485 00 3 18 5 10 0 1 87 164 73 00 1 0 251 02 0 00 00 00 33 74 00 00 00 081 1 1 5044 1619 39 67 95 6 00 11 435 26 0 0022532 710 10 0 2 00 1 08 0 0 86 53 2 3 5 00 1 3 9 00 00 0 0 110 0 6 421 01 3043 00 0 0 0 1 41 17 11 3235 5 21 0 0 0 0 00 135 251 00 133 48 3714 8 4 32 667 1916 00 4 45 0 00 1011 8 88 1915 00 0 007173 00 00 0 0 2520 5218 0 0 5 1 8 0 2 42 81 88 0 0 00 116 0 0 0 13348 00 18 0 3235 00 10 00 0 0 11 54 00 32 00 00 00 54 8 0 30 01 510 00 4331 1110 143 0 0 1 0 4 00 0 1 3 1 7 3 00 4 5 0 0 00 0 0 0 180 12 1916 11 663 0 0 1941 1512 29 25 0 1 0 0 00 1 2 00 1 1 10 0 2164 133 1 1 6 1 0 791 16 54 10821 2 09 11 0 0 0 4 3 0 1 929 43 007 80 0 0 2 00 2 92 4 0 5 340 96 1625 485154 10 00 00 127 00 0 0 0 01 4650 01 00 0 2 0 7 20 68 191500 24 1 2 58 33 00 6 13 0 0 74 0 24 00 1 5 5 8 00 3 3 01 146 242 11 00 1 2 14 3 110 0 0 1 1 00 19 73 0 0 00 10 1915 26 00 0 0 013 00 3 313 0 0 0 4 7 9 5 9 2 2 5 1 9 5 5 5 341 105 1 23 0 1 00 8 00 35 211 0 00 00 4 4 2 9 150 00 00 00 68 00 1 2 1 1 0 0 00 3 256 2 1 7 0 0 0 5432 3 19 8 0 0 0 0 02 1 2 11 10 121 00 0 0 00 135 251 0 00 0 22 00 10 11 11 00 3 1 1 5 0 12 0 06 12 00 2933 0 00 20 7214 01 1 22 1 01 6 00 0 251 135 00 3 0 0 4330 00 16 7 1 2 1 0 4 1 08 00 00 7 00 610 9 00 505 02 20 00 30 0 00 19 1 11 5 7 2 00 41 00 00 00 0 0 00 8 0 0 2 11 42 0 0 00 08 1214 0 0 7 8 00 1 0 0 1 3 2 2 333 1 0 1 0 12 0 1 00 4 0 2 5 0 3 2 2 2 5 1 121 4 00 1 1 480 01 00 2 11199 0 2 2 14 0 0 1 0 1 21 660 0 0 11 2 3 2 1 2 3 00 1437 0 1 1 68 00 363 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 78 2125 0 0 0 0 0 00 18 12 0 0 0 00 4 10 1 4 1 1 6 2 32 0 00 0 78 5 8 0 0 25 00 135 6 2 0 0 14 0 53 1 0 1 3 00 0 22 1 01 0 1 21 4 7 0 02 0 0 00 2 5 2 0 2 5 8 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 0 5 8 0 11 00 0 28 0 80 00 0 0 2 1 8 0 2 1 8 26 43 1619 113 00 0 0 0 0 4 0 36 0000 0 0 2 0 11 0 0 00 0 545 0 0 0 7 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 7 0 11 0 3 8 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 1 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 24 96 0 2 01 0 11 1 0 0 2 19 0 1 0 3 1 8 0 1 4 0 0 0 00 0 1 5 9 8 3 1 0 2 20 57 0 0 1 0 14 0 1 1 10 10 1619 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 00 0 0 2 11 0 0 5 0 0 01 0 0 10 2 8 00 1 0 0 00 12 811 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 538 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 3085 2 9 0 6 2 9 33 3 1 0 0 0 1 00 00 01 2 55 0 2 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 18 0 0 00 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 00 00 0 0 00 25 1 0 0 0 00 4 0 0 5 0 3 2 0 1 0 9 0 00 00 3 00 41 00 00 00 000 1 0 3 00 6 Camino Tassajara Capacity Analysis 0 .5 1 1.5 Miles PM Peak Hour Select-Link Analysis - Scenario 2 750 375 188 4.2.e Packet Pg. 262 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . I n i t i a l S t u d y / C E Q A A d d e n d u m [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r T a s s a j a r a R o a d A l i g n m e n t P r o j e c t ) Number ST0116 Program STREETS ESTIMATED COSTS PRIOR YEARS 2018-2019 BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 FUTURE YEARS ESTIMATE TOTALS 9100 $11,280 $91,458 $89,360 $108,440 $300,538 9200 $116,096 $1,214,206 $454,110 $145,050 $1,929,462 9300 $1,980,000 $1,980,000 9400 $48,589 $7,751,411 $7,800,000 9500 $490,000 $490,000 $127,376 $1,305,664 $592,059 $10,474,901 $12,500,000 FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR YEARS 2018-2019 BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 FUTURE YEARS ESTIMATE TOTALS 2201 $200,000 $200,000 2220 $15,254 $84,746 $592,059 $692,059 4301 $112,122 $108,638 $220,760 Road Maint. & Rehab. Account (RMRA) TASSAJARA ROAD REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING - FALLON ROAD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT 2018-2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Salaries & Benefits Contract Services Land/Right of Way Improvements Miscellaneous TOTAL State Gas Tax Traffic Impact Fee - Category 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project provides for the planning and preliminary engineering to define a new roadway alignment, design cross-section,right-of-way, and environmental clearance for Tassajara Road between North Dublin Ranch Drive and the City and Contra Costa County limit. The project also provides for the design and construction of a realigned Tassajara Road from Fallon Drive to the northern City limit. The design and construction of the southerly Tassajara Road segment, down to North Dublin Ranch Drive, is included in another Capital Improvement Program, project, Tassajara Road Improvements - North Dublin Ranch Drive to Quarry Lane School. The project will improve Tassajara Road to a four-lane arterial standard with bike lanes, sidewalks, landscaped median, stormwater treatment areas, and other associated street improvements. Portions of the existing roadway have been improved by adjacent development projects and this project will complete the street improvements and realign a portion of existing roadway to improve safety and achieve good circulation while adhering to the Complete Streets Policy. The roadway segment is a project within both the Tri-Valley Transportation Council Strategic Expenditure Plan (Project B-8) and the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact (Category 1) Fee Program. Design and construction of the realigned roadway will be coordinated with Contra Costa County. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT:TBD MANAGING DEPARTMENT: Public Works 4.2.f Packet Pg. 263 At t a c h m e n t : 6 . C I P S T 0 1 1 6 T a s s a j a r a R e a l i g n m e n t a n d W i d e n i n g ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR YEARS 2018-2019 BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 FUTURE YEARS ESTIMATE TOTALS 4303 $409,263 $409,263 4306 $503,017 $2,000,000 $2,503,017 9998 $8,474,901 $8,474,901 $127,376 $1,305,664 $592,059 $10,474,901 $12,500,000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT TOTAL Traffic Impact Fee - Category 3 TVTD Unidentified 4.2.f Packet Pg. 264 At t a c h m e n t : 6 . C I P S T 0 1 1 6 T a s s a j a r a R e a l i g n m e n t a n d W i d e n i n g ( E s t a b l i s h R i g h t - O f - W a y L i n e s f o r Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Appointing Directors to Pooled Liability Assurance Network (PLAN) Joint Exercise of Powers (JPA) to Represent the City of Dublin Prepared by: Renuka Dhadwal, Management Analyst EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will designate employees to represent the City of Dublin on the Board of Directors to the Pooled Liability Assurance Network Joint Powers Aut hority. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 97-18 and Appointing Directors to PLAN JPA on Behalf of the City of Dublin. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Adoption of the Resolution (Attachment 1) will have no direct financial impact. Participation on the Board of Directors provides the City with one vote on the approval of Pooled Liability Assurance Network (PLAN) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) business including premiums for programs provided by PLAN JPA (formerly ABAG PLAN). Service on the Board of Directors is assumed as part of the employee’s regular duties and the Board Members do not receive additional compensation. DESCRIPTION: The City of Dublin has been a charter member of ABAG PLAN Corporation since 1986 for the provision of liability insurance property insurance, and employee bonds. In June 1992, the City Council approved a Risk Coverage Agreement which established procedures by which ABAG PLAN could also offer partially self -insured property insurance program. This document was unanimously approved by all 26 cities which were member agencies in ABAG PLAN Corporation. On July 27, 1992 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-92 (Attachment 2) designating City Staff as the regular and alternate voting members to the ABAG PLAN Board of Directors. Later in 2014, the City Council updated its regular and alternate voting members to the ABAG PLAN Board of Directors due to changes in City Staff (Attachment 3). 4.3 Packet Pg. 265 Page 2 of 2 During 2017, ABAG PLAN Corporation separated from the former model of service and moved to a new risk management-focused joint powers authority that provides the same pooled risk coverage for its member agencies, with preference for the existing members of ABAG PLAN, under a new risk coverage agreement to ensure these essential insurance services continued in a seamless manner. On December 19, 2017, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the Pooled Liability Assurance Network (PLAN) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) Agreement, pursuant to California Government Code §6500 et seq., including the powers delegated. In mid-2018, the City Council updated its regular and alternate voting members to the PLAN JPA Board of Directors (Attachment 4). However, with the change in Staff leadership it is now appropriate to appoint new Board representatives via the proposed Resolution (Attachment 1). STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: A copy of this staff report has been provided to Jon Paulsen, General Manager / Executive Director PLAN JPA under contact with Sedgwick (formerly Bickmore). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 97-18 and Appointing Directors to PLAN JPA on Behalf of the City of Dublin 2. Resolution 90-92 Appointing Directors to ABAG PLAN Corporation on Behalf of the City of Dublin 3. Resolution 131-14 Rescinding Resolution 64-13 and Appointing Directors to ABAG PLAN Corporation on Behalf of the City of Dublin 4. Resolution 97-18 Rescinding Resolution No. 131-14 and Appointing Directors to PLAN JPA on Behalf of the City of Dublin 4.3 Packet Pg. 266 ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. XX - 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 97-18 AND APPOINTING DIRECTORS TO PLAN JPA ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has been a charter member of ABAG PLAN Corporation since 1986; and WHEREAS, ABAG Plan Corporation officially dissolved on June 20, 2018; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2017, the City Council approved membership in PLAN JPA and this succession JPA is now providing the City with liability insurance, property insurance, and employee bonds; and WHEREAS, PLAN JPA is a self-funded insurance pool serving public agencies; and WHEREAS, the operations of these programs are governed by a Board of Directors consisting of one representative from each member agency; and WHEREAS, participation on the Board of Directors has been carried out by City Staff as part of its regular duties and does not result in any remuneration to the employee; and WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City Council revise its designees to the new PLAN JPA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Dublin rescinds Resolution No. 97-18. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby designate the following individuals as appointees to the PLAN JPA Board of Directors: Name Title Designation Julie E. Carter Human Resources Director Director Lisa Hisatomi Administrative Services Director / Finance Director Voting Alternate Director Linda Smith City Manager Second Voting Alternate Director BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these appointments shall be in accordance with PLAN JPA Corporation Bylaws and the Memorandum of Coverage. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2020, by the following vote: 4.3.a Packet Pg. 267 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n R e s c i n d i n g R e s o l u t i o n N o . 9 7 - 1 8 a n d A p p o i n t i n g D i r e c t o r s t o P L A N J P A o n B e h a l f o f t h e C i t y o f D u b l i n ( P L A N J P A ) ATTACHMENT 4 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ City Clerk 4.3.a Packet Pg. 268 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n R e s c i n d i n g R e s o l u t i o n N o . 9 7 - 1 8 a n d A p p o i n t i n g D i r e c t o r s t o P L A N J P A o n B e h a l f o f t h e C i t y o f D u b l i n ( P L A N J P A ) 4.3.b Packet Pg. 269 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . R e s o l u t i o n 9 0 - 9 2 A p p o i n t i n g D i r e c t o r s t o A B A G P L A N C o r p o r a t i o n o n B e h a l f o f t h e C i t y o f D u b l i n ( P L A N J P A ) 4.3.c Packet Pg. 270 At t a c h m e n t : 3 . R e s o l u t i o n 1 3 1 - 1 4 R e s c i n d i n g R e s o l u t i o n 6 4 - 1 3 a n d A p p o i n t i n g D i r e c t o r s t o A B A G P L A N C o r p o r a t i o n o n B e h a l f o f t h e C i t y o f 4.3.c Packet Pg. 271 At t a c h m e n t : 3 . R e s o l u t i o n 1 3 1 - 1 4 R e s c i n d i n g R e s o l u t i o n 6 4 - 1 3 a n d A p p o i n t i n g D i r e c t o r s t o A B A G P L A N C o r p o r a t i o n o n B e h a l f o f t h e C i t y o f 4.3.d Packet Pg. 272 At t a c h m e n t : 4 . R e s o l u t i o n 9 7 - 1 8 R e s c i n d i n g R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 3 1 - 1 4 a n d A p p o i n t i n g D i r e c t o r s t o P L A N J P A o n B e h a l f o f t h e C i t y o f D u b l i n 4.3.d Packet Pg. 273 At t a c h m e n t : 4 . R e s o l u t i o n 9 7 - 1 8 R e s c i n d i n g R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 3 1 - 1 4 a n d A p p o i n t i n g D i r e c t o r s t o P L A N J P A o n B e h a l f o f t h e C i t y o f D u b l i n Page 1 of 4 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2019 Prepared by: Jay Baksa, Assistant Administrative Services Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive an informational report of the City’s investments through the quarter ending December 31, 2019 including a monthly transaction ledger. The City’s investment portfolio for this period totaled $296,625,984 (book value) with an average market yield of 1.80%. As required by the Policy, the City Treasurer (Administrative Services Director) affirms that the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact resulting from this report. Investments are made in accordance with the City Investment Policy and State Law. Interest earned is apportioned between funds (i.e. General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, etc.) based upon their proportionate share of the total cash balance. Based on the financial needs of the City including the timing of revenues and expenditures, the quarterly cash balance can vary from quarter to quarter. DESCRIPTION: The total investment portfolio of $296,625,984 (book value) is comprised of $204,640,300 managed by Chandler Asset Management (Chandler), and $91,985,684 invested by the City in local government pools. The average m arket yield of the Chandler portfolio and the local pools was 1.75% and 1.91% respectively. The total investment portfolio balance fluctuates throughout the year due to normal cash flow needs and includes both discretionary and restricted funds. 4.4 Packet Pg. 274 Page 2 of 4 Economic Update Highlights The following are some highlights from the Economic Update included in the attached Investment Report prepared by Chandler (Attachment 1). Economic growth has slowed over the past year and the consensus forecast calls for GDP growth of 1.8% in 2020 versus 2.3% in 2019. Chandler does not anticipate a recession within the next six-month horizon. However, an uncertain outlook on the future path of global central bank policy, lingering uncertainty about trade policy and Brexit, and the upcoming US presidential election potentially sets the stage for a continued volatile financial market environment this year. The Federal Open Market Committee kept the target fed funds rate unchanged in December in a range of 1.50%-1.75%. The vote to keep policy unchanged was unanimous and the Fed's quarterly update on their Summary of Economic Projections was little changed from the September 2019 forecast. Notably the Fed's forecast calls for no change to the fed funds rate in 2020. Chandler believes the hur dle rate to tighten policy remains high, as market-based measures of inflation are still too low. Conversely, if market-based inflation metrics fail to improve, and/or the domestic or global economy experiences an exogenous shock, Chandler believes the Fed has left the door open for additional policy accommodation. The Treasury yield curve steepened slightly in December. The two -year Treasury yield decreased about four basis points to 1.57%, the five-year Treasury yield increased almost seven basis points to 1.69%, and the 10-year Treasury yield increased about 14 basis points to 1.92%. Chandler believes the increase in longer-term yields were driven by more favorable developments with regard to global trade and Brexit. City of Dublin Portfolio The City's portfolio managed by Chandler has maintained a healthy balance of investment types with minimal change from the prior quarter as shown below in Chart 1. In the reporting period the City received a large portion of its property tax revenue, the largest single component of the City’s revenue, which was placed into the local government pools. While the yield of the two local governmental pools is currently outpacing the funds managed by Chandler, the difference between the yield of the funds managed by Chandler and those in the local pools has been decreasing over the past six months. As previously mentioned, Chandler is still advocating investing monies not needed for the next 18 months in a longer maturity strategy, as historically, over an investment cycle, the total return of a longer maturity investment strategy will be superior to a shorter maturity mandate. Accordingly, Staff will continue to look to the locally invested funds for short term needs while positioning the bulk of City funds for higher earni ngs over the long term. 4.4 Packet Pg. 275 Page 3 of 4 Chart 1: Investments by Type September 30,2019 - December 31, 2019 The market value of the City's portfolio increased by $11.92 million from the September 30, 2019 quarter, due to the receipt of property tax revenue. The City’s portfolio increased $23.53 million from the same quarter the prior year due to the excess of revenues over expenditures in Fiscal Year 2018 -19 (see Table 1 below). Overall market yield-to-maturity decreased from 1.94% to 1.80% (shown in Table 2) due t o the decrease in shorter term rates as discussed in the Economic Update Highlights. For detailed monthly transactions, see Attachment 2. Table 1: Portfolio Values and Yield to Maturity 4.4 Packet Pg. 276 Page 4 of 4 Table 2: Quarterly Holdings (Market Value) by Type, and YTM, 5 Quarters Funds Managed by the City The City participates in two local agency investment pools managed by government finance professionals and treasurers: the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the California Asset Management Program (CAMP). The City has typically carried close to the $50 million maximum allowable in LAIF with any excesses deposited into CAMP. LAIF quarterly rates are currently near the highest measured since 2011, but have been decreasing, as shown below. Table 3: Quarterly LAIF Yields, Recent Eight Years and 3 Quarters STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: Strategy 1: Assure the City's long-term financial sustainability. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: Q2 Reduced 2. Transaction Ledger - October-December 2019 4.4 Packet Pg. 277 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. | 800.317.4747 | www.chandlerasset.com INVESTMENT REPORT Period Ending December 31, 2019 City of Dublin 4.4.a Packet Pg. 278 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) SECTION 1 Economic Update SECTION 2 Account Profile SECTION 3 Consolidated Information SECTION 4 Portfolio Holdings SECTION 5 Transactions Table of Contents As of December 31, 2019 1 4.4.a Packet Pg. 279 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) SECTION |Section 1 |Economic Update 2 4.4.a Packet Pg. 280 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Economic Update ▪ ▪ ▪ Economicgrowth has slowed overthe past yearand the consensus forecast calls for GDP growth of 1.8%in 2020 versus 2.3% in 2019.We are not anticipating arecession within our 6-month outlook horizon.We believe the impact of monetary policy on economicgrowth is somewhat lagged, and the more accommodative monetary policy stance of the Federal Reserve and otherglobal central banks throughout 2019 should provide atailwind for an ongoing slow economicgrowth environment in 2020.However,an uncertain outlook on the future path of global central bank policy, lingering uncertainty about trade policy and Brexit, and the upcoming US presidential election potentially sets the stage for a continued volatile financial market environment this year. The recent confirmation of aphase one trade deal is consistent with our view that there will be modest incremental progress on trade in front of the presidential election cycle. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) kept the target fed funds rate unchanged in December in a range of 1.50%- 1.75%. The vote to keep policy unchanged was unanimous and the Fed's quarterly update on their Summary of Economic Projections was little changed from the September 2019 forecast. Notably the Fed's forecast calls for no change to the fed funds rate in 2020. We believe the hurdle rate to tighten policy remains high, as market-based measures of inflation are still too low. Conversely,if market-based inflation metrics fail to improve, and/or the domestic or global economy experiences an exogenous shock, we believe the Fed has left the door open for additional policy accommodation. The Treasury yield curve steepened slightly in December. The 2-year Treasury yield decreased about 4 basis points to 1.57%, the 5-year Treasury yield increased almost seven basis points to 1.69%, and the 10-year Treasury yield increased about fourteen basis points to 1.92%. We believe the increase in longer-term yields were driven by more favorable developments with regard to global trade and Brexit. 3 4.4.a Packet Pg. 281 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor Employment U.S. nonfarm payrolls rose by 145,000 in December, below expectations of 160,000. Payrolls for Octoberand Novemberwere revised down by a total of 14,000.On a trailing 3-month and 6-month basis, payrolls increased an average of about 184,000 and 189,000 per month, respectively. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.5% and the participation rate held steady at 63.2%. A broader measure of unemployment called the U-6, which includes those who are marginally attached to the laborforce and employed part time for economicreasons, declined to 6.7%in December from 6.9%in November. Wages edged up 0.1%in December, below expectations of 0.3%,but the November increase in wages was revised up slightly to 0.3% from 0.2%. The average workweek was unchanged at 34.3 hours.On a year-over-year basis, wages were up 2.9%in December, versus up 3.1% in November. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 MO M C h a n g e I n ( 0 0 0 ' s ) Nonfarm Payroll (000's) Non-farm Payroll (000's) 3 month average (000's) 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% Unemployment Rate Underemployment Rate (U6) Unemployment Rate (U3) Ra t e ( % ) 4 4.4.a Packet Pg. 282 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Commerce Inflation The ConsumerPrice Index (CPI) was up 2.1% year-over-year in November,up from 1.8%in October. Core CPI (CPI less food and energy) was up 2.3% year-over-year in November, unchanged from October. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index was up 1.5% year-over-year in November versus up 1.4% year-over-year in October. Core PCE, which is the Fed's primary inflation gauge, was up 1.6% year-over-year in November versus 1.7% year-over-year in October. Core PCE softened and remains below the Fed’s 2.0% inflation target. 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) PCE Price Deflator YOY % Change PCE Core Deflator YOY % Change YO Y ( % ) C h a n g e 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% Consumer Price Index (CPI) CPI YOY % Change Core CPI YOY % Change YO Y ( % ) C h a n g e 5 4.4.a Packet Pg. 283 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Retail sales increased 0.2%in November, following growth of 0.4%in October. Excluding auto and gas, retail sales were flat in November, below expectations of 0.4%.On a year-over-year basis, retail sales increased 3.3%in November, versus 3.2%in October. The Consumer Confidence Index was nearly unchanged at 126.5 in December versus 126.8 in November. Overall, the index remains at a strong level. Source: US Department of Commerce Source: The Conference Board 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% Retail Sales YOY % Change YO Y ( % ) C h a n g e 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 In d e x L e v e l Consumer Confidence Consumer 6 4.4.a Packet Pg. 284 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Source: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Activity The Leading Economic Index (LEI) was flat in November, following adownwardly-revised 0.2% decline in October. Although the index remains slightly positive on a year-over-year basis,up 0.1%, the year-over-year rate of change has decelerated. The Conference Board believes the index points to roughly 2.0% GDP growth in 2020.The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) jumped to +0.56 in Novemberfrom -0.76 in October. Weakness in vehicle production related to the GM strike (which ended on October 25)contributed to the October decline.On a 3- month moving average basis, the index improved to -0.25 in November versus -0.35 in October. Negative values are generally consistent with below-average growth,but the index suggests that trends are improving. Periods of economic contraction have historically been associated with values below -0.70 on a 3-month moving average basis. -0.70 -0.50 -0.30 -0.10 0.10 0.30 0.50 0.70 Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) 3 M o n t h A v e r a g e -0.4% -0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% Leading Economic Indicators (LEI) MO M ( % ) C h a n g e 7 4.4.a Packet Pg. 285 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Source: US Department of Commerce Source: S&P Housing 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 MO M C h a n g e ( I n T h o u s a n d s o f U n i t s ) Housing Starts Multi Family Housing Starts Single Family Housing Starts 1.5% 2.5% 3.5% 4.5% 5.5% 6.5% 7.5% S&P/Case -Shiller 20 City Composite Home Price Index YO Y ( % ) C h a n g e Housing starts increased 3.2%in November to a 1.365 million annualized rate and starts in the prior month were revised higher. Permits were also stronger than expected in November,up 1.4%. Multi-family starts rose 4.9% month-over-month in November to an annualized rate of 427,000. Single-family starts rose 2.4%in November to an annualized rate of 938,000. The trends suggest that low mortgage rates and astrong labor market continue to drive housing activity. According to the Case-Shiller 20-City home price index, home prices were up 2.2% year-over- year in October, versus up 2.1% year-over-year in September. The year-over-year pace of price appreciation remains low but suggests that pricing in the sector may be gaining momentum. 8 4.4.a Packet Pg. 286 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Source: Institute for Supply Management Source: Federal Reserve Manufacturing The Institute forSupply Management (ISM) manufacturing index decreased to 47.2 in Decemberfrom 48.1 in November. The reading was below expectations and suggests the manufacturing sector remains in contraction. The Industrial Production index declined 0.8% year-over-year in November versus down 1.3% year-over-year in October.On a month-over-month basis, the index rose 1.1%in November, greater than the consensus forecast of 0.9%, following a 0.9% decline in October. The manufacturing component of the index also rose 1.1%in November, following a 0.7% decline in October. The GM strike negatively impacted manufacturing volumes in October. Capacity Utilization increased to 77.3% in November from 76.6% in October, but remains below the long-run average of 79.8% indicating there is still excess capacity for growth. 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 Institute of Supply Management Purchasing Manager Index EXPANDING CONTRACTING -2.0% -1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% Industrial Production YO Y ( % ) C h a n g e 9 4.4.a Packet Pg. 287 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce 12/18 3/19 6/19 9/19 1.0% 0.8% 3.0% 2.1% 0.5% 1.1% -1.2% -0.2% -0.4% 0.7% -0.7% -0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5% 0.2% -0.1% 0.4% 0.3% 0.1% 1.1% 3.1% 2.0% 2.1% Net Exports and Imports Personal Consumption Expenditures Gross Private Domestic Investment Federal Government Expenditures State and Local (Consumption and Gross Investment) Components of GDP Total 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% Gross Domestic Product (GDP) GDP QOQ % Change GDP YOY % Change Gross Domestic Product (GDP) According to the third estimate, third quarter 2019 GDP grew at a2.1% annualized rate. This follows growth of 3.1%in the first quarter, and 2.0% in the second quarter on 2019.Third quarter growth was fueled by consumer spending which contributed 2.1%to GDP in the quarter, while business investment and exports were a drag on the economy. The consensus estimate for the fourth quarter signals a slowdown to 1.9% growth. The consensus forecast calls for GDP growth of 1.6% in the current quarter and 1.8% for the full year 2020. 10 4.4.a Packet Pg. 288 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% US Treasury Note Yields 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year Y i e l d ( % ) 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% US Treasury Yield Curve Dec-19 Sep-19 Dec-18 Y i e l d ( % ) Bond Yields Treasury yields declined meaningfully in 2019.At year-end, the 3-month T-bill yield was down 81 basis points, the 2-Year Treasury yield was down 92 basis points, and the 10-Year Treasury yield was down 77 basis points.We believe the year-over-year decline in long-term Treasury yields largely reflects adecline in global economicgrowth and inflation expectations, while the decline in shorter-term rates is in line with the Fed's three 25 basis point rate cuts in 2019. 11 4.4.a Packet Pg. 289 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Section 2|SECTION |Section 2 |Account Profile 12 4.4.a Packet Pg. 290 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Objectives Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective The performance objective of the City of Dublin is to earn a return that equals or exceeds the return on of the ICE BAML 1-5 Year Treasury and Agency Index. Investment Objectives The investment objectives of the City of Dublin are first,to provide safety of principal;second,to provide adequate liquidity to meet all requirements which might be reasonably anticipated;third,to attain a market average rate of return on its investments throughout economic cycles;and fourth,to be diversified to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual financial institutions. Strategy In order to achieve this objective,the portfolio invests in high quality fixed income instruments consistent with the City's investment policy and California Government Code. As of December 31, 2019 13 4.4.a Packet Pg. 291 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Compliance As of December 31, 2019 Category Standard Comment Treasury Issues No limitations Complies Agency Issues 35% max per issuer; 25% max callables Complies Supranationals "AA" rated or equivalent by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; USD denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued by: IBRD, IFC, IADB Complies Municipal Securities "A" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 5% max per issuer Complies Medium Term Notes "A" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; Issued by corporations organized and operating within the U.S. or by depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating within the U.S.Complies Banker’s Acceptances "A-1" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 40% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 20% max amount invested in BA with any one financial institution in combination with any other debt from that financial institution; 180 days max maturity Complies Commercial Paper "A-1" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 25% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 20% max amount invested in CP of any one issuer in combination with any other debt from that issuer; 270 days max maturity Complies Negotiable Certificates of Deposit "A" or better long term debt rating and/or "A-1" or higher short term rating by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 20% max amount invested in NCDs with any one financial institution in combination with any other debt from that financial institution. Complies Time Deposits/ Certificates of Deposit 10% max; Collateralized/FDIC Insured; 1 year max maturity Complies Asset-Backed and Mortgage-Backed Securities (ABS/MBS)"AA" rated or higher by a NRSRO; "A" rated or higher for the issuer's debt by a NRSRO; 20% maximum; 5% max per issue Complies Money Market Mutual Funds and Mutual Funds Highest rating or "AAA" rated by two NRSROs; SEC registered adviser with AUM >$500 million and experience greater than 5 years; 10% per one Mutual Fund; 20% maximum in Money Market Mutual Funds; 20% maximum combined of total portfolio in these securities Complies LAIF Max program limit Complies CAMP Not used by adviser Complies Max Per Issuer 5% (except US Government, Agencies and its instrumentalities including agency backed-mortgage pools, Money Market Mutual Funds)Complies Maximum Maturity 5 years Complies City of Dublin Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and with the City's investment policy. 14 4.4.a Packet Pg. 292 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Portfolio Characteristics City of Dublin 12/31/2019 9/30/2019 Benchmark*Portfolio Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs)2.65 2.69 2.66 Average Modified Duration 2.53 2.42 2.39 Average Purchase Yield n/a 2.18%2.19% Average Market Yield 1.62%1.75%1.81% Average Quality**AAA AA/Aa1 AA/Aa1 Total Market Value 208,229,491 207,220,561 *ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index **Benchmark is a blended rating of S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively. As of December 31, 2019 15 4.4.a Packet Pg. 293 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) City of Dublin Sector Distribution ABS 7.3% Agency 32.4% Commercial Paper 2.0% Foreign Corporate 3.1% Money Market Fund FI 0.2% Supranational 2.2% US Corporate 21.3% US Treasury 31.6% December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 ABS 7.1% Agency 32.8% Commercial Paper 2.0% Foreign Corporate 3.1% Money Market Fund FI 1.3% Supranational 2.2% US Corporate 22.4% US Treasury 29.1% As of December 31, 2019 16 4.4.a Packet Pg. 294 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio Government of United States US Treasury 31.57% Federal Home Loan Bank Agency 15.08% Federal National Mortgage Association Agency 10.57% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Agency 3.59% Federal Farm Credit Bank Agency 3.15% Honda ABS ABS 2.26% John Deere ABS ABS 2.00% MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Commercial Paper 1.98% JP Morgan Chase & Co US Corporate 1.53% Apple Inc US Corporate 1.50% Nissan ABS ABS 1.35% Deere & Company US Corporate 1.35% Honda Motor Corporation US Corporate 1.24% Royal Bank of Canada Foreign Corporate 1.23% Toyota ABS ABS 1.22% Inter-American Dev Bank Supranational 1.21% Bank of America Corp US Corporate 1.21% Toronto Dominion Holdings Foreign Corporate 1.17% Boeing Company US Corporate 1.15% PNC Financial Services Group US Corporate 1.12% IBM Corp US Corporate 1.00% Charles Schwab Corp/The US Corporate 0.99% US Bancorp US Corporate 0.99% ChevronTexaco Corp US Corporate 0.98% Intl Bank Recon and Development Supranational 0.98% Chubb Corporation US Corporate 0.97% Qualcomm Inc US Corporate 0.96% Berkshire Hathaway US Corporate 0.93% Microsoft US Corporate 0.89% Exxon Mobil Corp US Corporate 0.88% State Street Bank US Corporate 0.87% HSBC Holdings PLC Foreign Corporate 0.74% Wal-Mart Stores US Corporate 0.70% Bank of New York US Corporate 0.61% General Dynamics Corp US Corporate 0.55% Oracle Corp US Corporate 0.48% American Express ABS ABS 0.48% Merck & Company US Corporate 0.37% Issuers City of Dublin –Account #10198 As of December 31, 2019 17 4.4.a Packet Pg. 295 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio First American Govt Oblig Fund Money Market Fund FI 0.16% TOTAL 100.00% Issuers City of Dublin –Account #10198 As of December 31, 2019 18 4.4.a Packet Pg. 296 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) AAA AA A <A NR 12/31/19 6.9%71.3%18.2%0.0%3.6% 09/30/19 7.7%69.2%19.3%0.0%3.8% Source: S&P Ratings December 31, 2019 vs. September 30, 2019 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% AAA AA A <A NR 12/31/2019 9/30/2019 Quality Distribution City of Dublin As of December 31, 2019 19 4.4.a Packet Pg. 297 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ City of Dublin ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Portfolio Compared to the Benchmark as of December 31, 2019 0 -0.25 0.25 -0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ Portfolio 1.4% 7.6% 10.3% 21.9% 19.8% 25.2% 13.9% 0.0% Benchmark*0.3% 0.1% 1.8% 34.9% 28.0% 20.4% 14.4% 0.0% *ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Duration Distribution City of Dublin As of December 31, 2019 20 4.4.a Packet Pg. 298 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% 5.00% 12 months 2 years 3 years 5 years 10 years Since Inception City of Dublin ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Total Rate of Return Annualized Since Inception 10/31/2013 Annualized TOTAL RATE OF RETURN 3 months 12 months 2 years 3 years 5 years 10 years Since Inception City of Dublin 0.49%4.61%3.03%2.35%1.87%N/A 1.64% ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index 0.35%4.18%2.85%2.11%1.68%N/A 1.46% *ICE BAML 1-3 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index to 12/31/2014 Total rate of return: A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time.It is the internal rate of return,which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value;it includes interest earnings,realized and unrealized gains and losses in the portfolio. Investment Performance City of Dublin As of December 31, 2019 21 4.4.a Packet Pg. 299 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Portfolio Characteristics City of Dublin Reporting Account 12/31/2019 Portfolio 9/30/2019 Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs)0.00 0.00 Modified Duration 0.00 0.00 Average Purchase Yield 1.91%2.25% Average Market Yield 1.91%2.25% Average Quality*AAA/NR AAA/NR Total Market Value 92,248,998 81,335,761 *Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s, respectively. As of December 31, 2019 22 4.4.a Packet Pg. 300 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) City of Dublin Reporting Account Sector Distribution LAIF 53.8% Local Gov Investment Pool 46.2% December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 LAIF 61.1% Local Gov Investment Pool 39.0% As of December 31, 2019 23 4.4.a Packet Pg. 301 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio Local Agency Investment Fund LAIF 53.80% CAMP Local Gov Investment Pool 46.20% TOTAL 100.00% Issuers City of Dublin Reporting Account –Account #10219 As of December 31, 2019 24 4.4.a Packet Pg. 302 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) SECTION |Section 3 |Consolidated Information 25 4.4.a Packet Pg. 303 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Portfolio Characteristics City of Dublin Consolidated 12/31/2019 9/30/2019 Portfolio Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs)1.86 1.91 Modified Duration 1.67 1.72 Average Purchase Yield 2.10%2.21% Average Market Yield 1.80%1.94% Average Quality*AA+/Aa1 AA+/Aa1 Total Market Value 300,478,490 288,556,322 * Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively. As of December 31, 2019 26 4.4.a Packet Pg. 304 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) City of Dublin Consolidated Sector Distribution ABS 5.1% Agency 22.4% Commercial Paper 1.4% Foreign Corporate 2.2% LAIF 16.5%Local Gov Investment Pool 14.2% Money Market Fund FI 0.1% Supranational 1.5% US Corporate 14.7% US Treasury 21.9% December 31, 2019 September 30, 2019 ABS 5.1% Agency 23.5% Commercial Paper 1.4% Foreign Corporate 2.2% LAIF 17.2%Local Gov Investment Pool 11.0% Money Market Fund FI 0.9% Supranational 1.6% US Corporate 16.1% US Treasury 20.9% As of December 31, 2019 27 4.4.a Packet Pg. 305 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) SECTION |Section 4 |Portfolio Holdings 28 4.4.a Packet Pg. 306 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration ABS 43814WAB1 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 A2 2.750% Due 09/20/2021 1,400,888.67 02/19/2019 2.77% 1,400,798.45 1,400,828.14 100.39 1.91% 1,406,329.58 1,391.16 0.68% 5,501.44 NR / AAA AAA 1.72 0.45 47788BAD6 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 1.820% Due 10/15/2021 153,617.17 07/11/2017 1.65% 153,605.92 153,612.43 99.91 2.11% 153,480.21 124.26 0.07% (132.22) Aaa / NR AAA 1.79 0.31 89239AAB9 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A A2A 2.830% Due 10/15/2021 1,017,643.89 02/05/2019 2.85% 1,017,551.48 1,017,582.00 100.35 1.94% 1,021,205.62 1,279.97 0.49% 3,623.62 Aaa / AAA NR 1.79 0.39 47789JAB2 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 2.850% Due 12/15/2021 1,020,708.69 03/05/2019 2.87% 1,020,662.14 1,020,675.72 100.33 2.03% 1,024,028.87 1,292.90 0.49% 3,353.15 Aaa / NR AAA 1.96 0.39 43815NAB0 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A2 1.900% Due 04/15/2022 1,300,000.00 08/20/2019 1.91% 1,299,909.00 1,299,928.36 99.98 1.93% 1,299,742.60 1,097.78 0.62% (185.76) Aaa / AAA NR 2.29 0.92 47788CAC6 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-A A3 2.660% Due 04/18/2022 427,831.59 02/21/2018 2.68% 427,800.83 427,814.52 100.38 1.95% 429,443.54 505.79 0.21% 1,629.02 Aaa / NR AAA 2.30 0.52 477870AB5 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A2 2.280% Due 05/16/2022 955,000.00 07/16/2019 2.29% 954,996.37 954,996.94 100.22 2.03% 957,065.65 967.73 0.46% 2,068.71 Aaa / NR AAA 2.38 0.83 43814UAG4 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 A3 3.010% Due 05/18/2022 610,000.00 05/22/2018 2.24% 609,986.70 609,992.03 100.92 1.90% 615,627.25 663.04 0.30% 5,635.22 NR / AAA AAA 2.38 0.82 43815HAC1 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3 2.950% Due 08/22/2022 1,360,000.00 08/21/2018 2.49% 1,359,813.41 1,359,876.38 101.01 1.91% 1,373,706.08 1,114.44 0.66% 13,829.70 Aaa / NR AAA 2.64 0.95 02582JHE3 American Express Credit Trust 2017-3 A 1.770% Due 11/15/2022 1,000,000.00 06/28/2018 2.25% 980,625.00 987,297.27 99.96 1.91% 999,631.00 786.67 0.48% 12,333.73 NR / AAA AAA 2.88 0.27 47788EAC2 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 3.080% Due 11/15/2022 1,585,000.00 07/18/2018 3.10% 1,584,879.86 1,584,919.93 101.03 2.00% 1,601,277.95 2,169.69 0.77% 16,358.02 Aaa / NR AAA 2.88 0.93 65479GAD1 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B A3 3.060% Due 03/15/2023 1,220,000.00 07/17/2018 3.08% 1,219,960.47 1,219,972.72 101.35 1.92% 1,236,513.92 1,659.20 0.59% 16,541.20 Aaa / AAA NR 3.21 1.16 89231PAD0 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D A3 3.180% Due 03/15/2023 1,500,000.00 08/29/2019 2.08% 1,532,050.78 1,528,977.08 101.72 1.92% 1,525,774.50 2,120.00 0.73% (3,202.58) Aaa / AAA NR 3.21 1.33 65479JAD5 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3 1.930% Due 07/15/2024 1,580,000.00 10/16/2019 1.94% 1,579,916.58 1,579,919.96 100.04 1.92% 1,580,627.26 1,355.29 0.76% 707.30 Aaa / AAA NR 4.54 2.45 TOTAL ABS 15,130,690.01 2.49% 15,142,556.99 15,146,393.48 1.95% 15,224,454.03 16,527.92 7.32% 78,060.55 Aaa / AAA Aaa 2.72 0.96 Agency 313383HU8 FHLB Note 1.750% Due 06/12/2020 2,000,000.00 10/08/2015 1.46% 2,026,040.00 2,002,485.08 100.03 1.69% 2,000,562.00 1,847.22 0.96% (1,923.08) Aaa / AA+ NR 0.45 0.44 As of December 31, 2019 29 4.4.a Packet Pg. 307 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 3137EAEK1 FHLMC Note 1.875% Due 11/17/2020 2,400,000.00 11/28/2017 1.91% 2,397,336.00 2,399,211.12 100.20 1.65% 2,404,711.20 5,500.00 1.16% 5,500.08 Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.88 0.87 3135G0F73 FNMA Note 1.500% Due 11/30/2020 2,500,000.00 12/04/2015 1.87% 2,455,750.00 2,491,879.40 99.97 1.54% 2,499,130.00 3,229.17 1.20% 7,250.60 Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.92 0.91 3130A7CV5 FHLB Note 1.375% Due 02/18/2021 3,470,000.00 Various 1.45% 3,457,221.20 3,467,089.38 99.75 1.60% 3,461,449.92 17,627.12 1.67% (5,639.46) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.14 1.11 3135G0J20 FNMA Note 1.375% Due 02/26/2021 5,000,000.00 Various 1.29% 5,018,675.00 5,004,690.23 99.75 1.60% 4,987,425.00 23,871.52 2.41% (17,265.23) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.16 1.13 313379RB7 FHLB Note 1.875% Due 06/11/2021 3,000,000.00 08/30/2017 1.67% 3,022,620.00 3,008,638.22 100.32 1.65% 3,009,636.00 3,125.00 1.45% 997.78 Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.45 1.42 3130A8QS5 FHLB Note 1.125% Due 07/14/2021 2,500,000.00 07/25/2016 1.28% 2,481,475.00 2,494,281.15 99.25 1.62% 2,481,322.50 13,046.88 1.20% (12,958.65) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.54 1.51 3137EAEC9 FHLMC Note 1.125% Due 08/12/2021 3,000,000.00 Various 1.33% 2,971,215.00 2,990,580.77 99.26 1.59% 2,977,869.00 13,031.26 1.44% (12,711.77) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.62 1.58 3135G0Q89 FNMA Note 1.375% Due 10/07/2021 2,000,000.00 10/06/2016 1.45% 1,992,924.00 1,997,500.54 99.62 1.59% 1,992,402.00 6,416.67 0.96% (5,098.54) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.77 1.73 3135G0S38 FNMA Note 2.000% Due 01/05/2022 2,500,000.00 01/30/2017 2.04% 2,495,475.00 2,498,152.29 100.77 1.61% 2,519,267.50 24,444.44 1.22% 21,115.21 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.02 1.95 313378CR0 FHLB Note 2.250% Due 03/11/2022 2,000,000.00 06/19/2017 1.86% 2,035,280.00 2,016,361.74 101.30 1.64% 2,026,042.00 13,750.00 0.98% 9,680.26 Aaa / AA+ NR 2.19 2.12 3135G0T45 FNMA Note 1.875% Due 04/05/2022 3,250,000.00 05/05/2017 1.99% 3,232,125.00 3,241,775.31 100.64 1.58% 3,270,939.75 14,557.29 1.58% 29,164.44 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.26 2.20 3135G0T94 FNMA Note 2.375% Due 01/19/2023 2,500,000.00 03/28/2018 2.70% 2,463,675.00 2,476,968.67 102.26 1.61% 2,556,450.00 26,718.75 1.24% 79,481.33 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.05 2.91 313383QR5 FHLB Note 3.250% Due 06/09/2023 1,500,000.00 08/28/2018 2.87% 1,525,005.00 1,517,983.54 105.36 1.64% 1,580,454.00 2,979.17 0.76% 62,470.46 Aaa / AA+ NR 3.44 3.25 3137EAEN5 FHLMC Note 2.750% Due 06/19/2023 2,000,000.00 07/16/2018 2.88% 1,988,360.00 1,991,810.57 103.86 1.60% 2,077,196.00 1,833.33 1.00% 85,385.43 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.47 3.30 3133EKZK5 FFCB Note 1.600% Due 08/14/2023 4,000,000.00 08/26/2019 1.54% 4,009,000.00 4,008,210.64 99.88 1.64% 3,995,004.00 24,355.56 1.93% (13,206.64) Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.62 3.48 313383YJ4 FHLB Note 3.375% Due 09/08/2023 5,000,000.00 Various 2.90% 5,102,615.00 5,080,493.79 106.09 1.66% 5,304,545.00 52,968.76 2.57% 224,051.21 Aaa / AA+ NR 3.69 3.44 3130A0F70 FHLB Note 3.375% Due 12/08/2023 5,000,000.00 Various 2.73% 5,147,870.00 5,118,296.02 106.23 1.73% 5,311,380.00 10,781.25 2.56% 193,083.98 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.94 3.69 3135G0V34 FNMA Note 2.500% Due 02/05/2024 2,000,000.00 02/27/2019 2.58% 1,992,340.00 1,993,644.28 103.09 1.71% 2,061,874.00 20,277.78 1.00% 68,229.72 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.10 3.85 As of December 31, 2019 30 4.4.a Packet Pg. 308 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 3130A1XJ2 FHLB Note 2.875% Due 06/14/2024 3,795,000.00 Various 1.96% 3,958,639.85 3,940,956.48 105.00 1.71% 3,984,575.43 5,152.24 1.92% 43,618.95 Aaa / AA+ NR 4.46 4.18 3133EKWV4 FFCB Note 1.850% Due 07/26/2024 2,500,000.00 08/13/2019 1.65% 2,524,140.00 2,522,270.75 100.41 1.76% 2,510,297.50 19,913.19 1.22% (11,973.25) Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.57 4.33 3130A2UW4 FHLB Note 2.875% Due 09/13/2024 2,000,000.00 10/10/2019 1.58% 2,122,020.00 2,116,458.22 105.23 1.71% 2,104,660.00 17,250.00 1.02% (11,798.22) Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.71 4.37 3135G0W66 FNMA Note 1.625% Due 10/15/2024 2,000,000.00 11/08/2019 1.80% 1,983,400.00 1,983,861.37 99.54 1.72% 1,990,882.00 6,590.28 0.96% 7,020.63 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.79 4.57 TOTAL Agency 65,915,000.00 1.96% 66,403,201.05 66,363,599.56 1.65% 67,108,074.80 329,266.88 32.39% 744,475.24 Aaa / AA+ Aaa 2.70 2.57 Commercial Paper 62479LDQ5 MUFG Bank Ltd Discount CP 1.900% Due 04/24/2020 4,140,000.00 11/19/2019 1.94% 4,105,695.50 4,115,091.00 99.40 1.94% 4,115,091.00 0.00 1.98% 0.00 P-1 / A-1 NR 0.32 0.31 TOTAL Commercial Paper 4,140,000.00 1.94% 4,105,695.50 4,115,091.00 1.94% 4,115,091.00 0.00 1.98% 0.00 P-1 / A-1 NR 0.32 0.31 Foreign Corporate 404280BF5 HSBC Holdings PLC Note 2.650% Due 01/05/2022 1,500,000.00 01/12/2018 2.89% 1,486,320.00 1,493,060.87 101.10 2.09% 1,516,549.50 19,433.33 0.74% 23,488.63 A2 / A A+ 2.02 1.93 89114QCB2 Toronto Dominion Bank Note 3.250% Due 03/11/2024 2,300,000.00 03/26/2019 2.95% 2,331,234.00 2,326,419.48 104.72 2.07% 2,408,461.10 22,840.28 1.17% 82,041.62 Aa3 / A AA- 4.20 3.89 78013XZU5 Royal Bank of Canada Note 2.550% Due 07/16/2024 2,500,000.00 09/10/2019 2.28% 2,531,325.00 2,529,359.44 101.54 2.19% 2,538,472.50 29,218.75 1.23% 9,113.06 A2 / A AA 4.55 4.22 TOTAL Foreign Corporate 6,300,000.00 2.67% 6,348,879.00 6,348,839.79 2.12% 6,463,483.10 71,492.36 3.14% 114,643.31 A1 / A AA- 3.82 3.56 Money Market Fund FI 31846V203 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 337,866.59 Various 1.20% 337,866.59 337,866.59 1.00 1.20% 337,866.59 0.00 0.16% 0.00 Aaa / AAA AAA 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Money Market Fund FI 337,866.59 1.20% 337,866.59 337,866.59 1.20% 337,866.59 0.00 0.16% 0.00 Aaa / AAA Aaa 0.00 0.00 Supranational 459058FY4 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note 2.000% Due 01/26/2022 2,000,000.00 10/26/2017 2.12% 1,990,320.00 1,995,275.61 100.72 1.65% 2,014,326.00 17,222.22 0.98% 19,050.39 Aaa / NR AAA 2.07 2.00 As of December 31, 2019 31 4.4.a Packet Pg. 309 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 4581X0CZ9 Inter-American Dev Bank Note 1.750% Due 09/14/2022 2,500,000.00 11/28/2017 2.18% 2,451,675.00 2,472,729.12 100.23 1.66% 2,505,850.00 13,003.47 1.21% 33,120.88 Aaa / AAA AAA 2.71 2.62 TOTAL Supranational 4,500,000.00 2.15% 4,441,995.00 4,468,004.73 1.65% 4,520,176.00 30,225.69 2.19% 52,171.27 Aaa / AAA Aaa 2.42 2.34 US Corporate 747525AD5 Qualcomm Inc Note 2.250% Due 05/20/2020 2,000,000.00 Various 2.22% 2,001,128.80 2,000,219.36 100.11 1.96% 2,002,198.01 5,125.00 0.96% 1,978.65 A2 / A- NR 0.39 0.38 24422ESY6 John Deere Capital Corp Note 2.375% Due 07/14/2020 1,000,000.00 09/15/2016 1.69% 1,025,153.50 1,003,521.13 100.27 1.87% 1,002,660.00 11,017.36 0.49% (861.13) A2 / A A 0.54 0.53 00440EAT4 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 10/3/2020 2.300% Due 11/03/2020 2,000,000.00 Various 2.25% 2,003,489.00 2,000,740.53 100.35 1.82% 2,007,084.00 7,411.11 0.97% 6,343.47 A3 / A A 0.84 0.75 24422ETF6 John Deere Capital Corp Note 2.550% Due 01/08/2021 750,000.00 Various 2.42% 753,733.15 750,941.78 100.71 1.84% 755,337.00 9,190.62 0.37% 4,395.22 A2 / A A 1.02 0.99 30231GAV4 Exxon Mobil Corp Callable Note Cont 2/1/2021 2.222% Due 03/01/2021 1,800,000.00 Various 2.06% 1,813,024.00 1,803,181.15 100.59 1.71% 1,810,625.40 13,332.00 0.88% 7,444.25 Aaa / AA+ NR 1.17 1.14 369550BE7 General Dynamics Corp Note 3.000% Due 05/11/2021 1,130,000.00 05/08/2018 3.24% 1,122,146.50 1,126,445.86 101.68 1.74% 1,149,016.77 4,708.33 0.55% 22,570.91 A2 / A+ NR 1.36 1.33 166764BG4 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 4/15/2021 2.100% Due 05/16/2021 1,000,000.00 04/20/2017 2.09% 1,000,190.00 1,000,064.23 100.63 1.60% 1,006,315.00 2,625.00 0.48% 6,250.77 Aa2 / AA NR 1.38 1.27 857477AV5 State Street Bank Note 1.950% Due 05/19/2021 1,800,000.00 Various 1.91% 1,802,989.00 1,800,919.50 100.21 1.80% 1,803,731.41 4,095.01 0.87% 2,811.91 A1 / A AA- 1.38 1.36 594918BP8 Microsoft Callable Note Cont 7/8/2021 1.550% Due 08/08/2021 1,850,000.00 Various 1.59% 1,846,471.85 1,848,854.48 99.87 1.63% 1,847,552.46 11,390.35 0.89% (1,302.02) Aaa / AAA AA+ 1.61 1.57 68389XBK0 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont 8/15/2021 1.900% Due 09/15/2021 1,000,000.00 06/28/2018 3.08% 964,080.00 980,938.53 100.21 1.77% 1,002,095.00 5,594.44 0.48% 21,156.47 A1 / A+ A 1.71 1.59 91159HHP8 US Bancorp Callable Cont 12/23/2021 2.625% Due 01/24/2022 2,000,000.00 05/23/2017 2.35% 2,023,280.00 2,010,052.73 101.59 1.80% 2,031,720.00 22,895.83 0.99% 21,667.27 A1 / A+ AA- 2.07 1.90 808513AT2 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 12/25/2022 2.650% Due 01/25/2023 2,000,000.00 05/21/2019 2.74% 1,993,920.00 1,994,929.56 101.96 1.97% 2,039,184.00 22,966.67 0.99% 44,254.44 A2 / A A 3.07 2.83 44932HAH6 IBM Credit Corp Note 3.000% Due 02/06/2023 2,000,000.00 02/26/2018 3.09% 1,991,340.00 1,994,565.90 102.94 2.02% 2,058,734.00 24,166.67 1.00% 64,168.10 A2 / A NR 3.10 2.92 084670BR8 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont 1/15/2023 2.750% Due 03/15/2023 1,865,000.00 Various 3.34% 1,818,500.75 1,832,251.03 102.54 1.88% 1,912,415.76 15,101.32 0.93% 80,164.73 Aa2 / AA A+ 3.21 2.89 As of December 31, 2019 32 4.4.a Packet Pg. 310 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 58933YAF2 Merck & Co Note 2.800% Due 05/18/2023 740,000.00 10/26/2018 3.41% 720,996.80 725,893.47 103.04 1.87% 762,478.98 2,474.89 0.37% 36,585.51 A1 / AA A+ 3.38 3.21 46625HRL6 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont 3/18/2023 2.700% Due 05/18/2023 500,000.00 12/20/2018 3.74% 479,055.00 483,919.56 101.82 2.11% 509,097.50 1,612.50 0.25% 25,177.94 A2 / A- AA- 3.38 3.06 69353RFL7 PNC Bank Callable Note Cont 5/9/2023 3.500% Due 06/08/2023 2,210,000.00 Various 3.53% 2,206,955.80 2,207,905.66 104.91 1.98% 2,318,440.28 4,941.80 1.12% 110,534.62 A2 / A NR 3.44 3.16 097023BQ7 Boeing Co Callable Note Cont 4/15/2023 1.875% Due 06/15/2023 2,400,000.00 02/13/2019 2.98% 2,293,368.00 2,314,950.69 99.38 2.06% 2,385,002.40 2,000.00 1.15% 70,051.71 A3 / A- A 3.46 3.32 166764AH3 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 3/24/2023 3.191% Due 06/24/2023 1,000,000.00 11/08/2018 3.59% 983,170.00 987,307.54 104.11 1.87% 1,041,063.00 620.47 0.50% 53,755.46 Aa2 / AA NR 3.48 3.07 931142EK5 Wal-Mart Stores Callable Note Cont 5/26/2023 3.400% Due 06/26/2023 1,380,000.00 Various 3.41% 1,379,641.30 1,379,749.99 105.15 1.83% 1,451,068.63 651.66 0.70% 71,318.64 Aa2 / AA AA 3.49 3.22 02665WCJ8 American Honda Finance Note 3.450% Due 07/14/2023 1,000,000.00 Various 3.54% 996,275.00 997,153.48 104.69 2.07% 1,046,927.00 16,004.17 0.51% 49,773.52 A2 / A NR 3.54 3.28 06406RAJ6 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Note 3.450% Due 08/11/2023 1,200,000.00 08/24/2018 3.42% 1,201,836.00 1,201,337.67 105.13 1.97% 1,261,525.20 16,100.00 0.61% 60,187.53 A1 / A AA- 3.61 3.36 06051GHF9 Bank of America Corp Callable Note 1X 3/5/2023 3.550% Due 03/05/2024 2,400,000.00 Various 3.10% 2,434,650.00 2,429,440.82 103.79 2.30% 2,490,852.00 27,453.33 1.21% 61,411.18 A2 / A- A+ 4.18 2.97 037833CU2 Apple Inc Callable Note Cont 3/11/2024 2.850% Due 05/11/2024 3,000,000.00 Various 2.55% 3,038,334.00 3,034,678.93 103.44 1.99% 3,103,317.00 11,875.00 1.50% 68,638.07 Aa1 / AA+ NR 4.36 3.94 24422ETT6 John Deere Capital Corp Note 2.650% Due 06/24/2024 1,000,000.00 08/26/2019 2.00% 1,029,680.00 1,027,557.59 102.84 1.98% 1,028,423.00 515.28 0.49% 865.41 A2 / A A 4.48 4.21 02665WCZ2 American Honda Finance Note 2.400% Due 06/27/2024 1,500,000.00 07/10/2019 2.49% 1,493,742.00 1,494,339.48 101.12 2.14% 1,516,788.00 400.00 0.73% 22,448.52 A2 / A NR 4.49 4.24 46647PAU0 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note Cont 7/23/2023 3.797% Due 07/23/2024 2,500,000.00 09/12/2019 2.35% 2,632,175.00 2,622,116.16 105.41 2.33% 2,635,125.00 41,661.53 1.29% 13,008.84 A2 / A- AA- 4.56 4.13 TOTAL US Corporate 43,025,000.00 2.70% 43,049,325.45 43,053,976.81 1.95% 43,978,776.80 285,930.34 21.26% 924,799.99 A1 / A+ A+ 2.82 2.56 US Treasury 912828H52 US Treasury Note 1.250% Due 01/31/2020 2,500,000.00 Various 1.53% 2,466,968.02 2,499,448.13 99.97 1.62% 2,499,195.00 13,077.45 1.21% (253.13) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.08 0.08 912828XE5 US Treasury Note 1.500% Due 05/31/2020 3,000,000.00 Various 1.67% 2,976,025.68 2,997,982.41 99.94 1.63% 2,998,344.00 3,934.43 1.44% 361.59 Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.42 0.41 As of December 31, 2019 33 4.4.a Packet Pg. 311 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 912828XM7 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due 07/31/2020 1,500,000.00 09/08/2015 1.52% 1,507,622.21 1,500,904.26 100.00 1.63% 1,499,941.50 10,200.41 0.73% (962.76) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.58 0.58 912828L99 US Treasury Note 1.375% Due 10/31/2020 5,000,000.00 Various 1.69% 4,927,376.14 4,987,665.97 99.77 1.65% 4,988,475.00 11,710.17 2.40% 809.03 Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.84 0.82 912828N89 US Treasury Note 1.375% Due 01/31/2021 2,000,000.00 03/15/2016 1.49% 1,988,834.83 1,997,518.85 99.72 1.63% 1,994,454.00 11,508.15 0.96% (3,064.85) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.09 1.07 912828P87 US Treasury Note 1.125% Due 02/28/2021 3,000,000.00 12/28/2018 2.54% 2,911,171.88 2,952,325.16 99.41 1.63% 2,982,423.00 11,404.53 1.44% 30,097.84 Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.16 1.15 912828T34 US Treasury Note 1.125% Due 09/30/2021 1,500,000.00 Various 1.66% 1,463,144.24 1,486,690.05 99.20 1.59% 1,487,929.50 4,287.91 0.72% 1,239.45 Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.75 1.72 912828U65 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 11/30/2021 2,500,000.00 12/28/2016 2.06% 2,464,461.50 2,486,176.18 100.31 1.59% 2,507,715.00 3,825.14 1.21% 21,538.82 Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.92 1.87 912828V72 US Treasury Note 1.875% Due 01/31/2022 1,500,000.00 02/27/2017 1.84% 1,502,407.37 1,501,018.91 100.59 1.59% 1,508,788.50 11,769.70 0.73% 7,769.59 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.09 2.02 912828J76 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 03/31/2022 3,000,000.00 04/25/2017 1.85% 2,985,830.37 2,993,544.95 100.38 1.58% 3,011,250.00 13,340.16 1.45% 17,705.05 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.25 2.19 912828WZ9 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 04/30/2022 2,750,000.00 05/23/2017 1.84% 2,738,944.75 2,744,785.26 100.38 1.59% 2,760,312.50 8,283.81 1.33% 15,527.24 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.33 2.27 912828XR6 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 05/31/2022 1,500,000.00 06/28/2017 1.81% 1,496,020.65 1,498,049.08 100.39 1.58% 1,505,859.00 2,295.08 0.72% 7,809.92 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.42 2.35 912828XW5 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 06/30/2022 3,000,000.00 07/25/2017 1.86% 2,984,072.55 2,991,938.94 100.41 1.58% 3,012,423.00 144.23 1.45% 20,484.06 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.50 2.44 912828L24 US Treasury Note 1.875% Due 08/31/2022 2,000,000.00 09/27/2017 1.92% 1,995,944.20 1,997,805.18 100.73 1.59% 2,014,688.00 12,671.70 0.97% 16,882.82 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.67 2.58 912828L57 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 09/30/2022 3,750,000.00 Various 2.02% 3,702,841.80 3,723,551.64 100.40 1.60% 3,765,086.25 16,675.20 1.82% 41,534.61 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.75 2.66 912828M49 US Treasury Note 1.875% Due 10/31/2022 1,000,000.00 01/30/2018 2.47% 973,359.38 984,113.96 100.75 1.60% 1,007,461.00 3,193.68 0.49% 23,347.04 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.84 2.74 9128284D9 US Treasury Note 2.500% Due 03/31/2023 3,750,000.00 Various 2.75% 3,706,123.05 3,721,165.09 102.77 1.62% 3,854,002.50 23,821.72 1.86% 132,837.41 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.25 3.10 912828R69 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due 05/31/2023 1,500,000.00 05/30/2018 2.67% 1,427,167.97 1,450,301.91 100.00 1.62% 1,500,058.50 2,131.15 0.72% 49,756.59 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.42 3.30 912828U57 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 11/30/2023 5,000,000.00 Various 2.53% 4,908,242.19 4,925,851.93 101.78 1.65% 5,089,060.00 9,289.62 2.45% 163,208.07 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.92 3.74 912828V80 US Treasury Note 2.250% Due 01/31/2024 5,000,000.00 Various 2.32% 4,983,691.41 4,986,172.35 102.32 1.66% 5,115,820.00 47,078.80 2.48% 129,647.65 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.09 3.86 As of December 31, 2019 34 4.4.a Packet Pg. 312 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 912828WJ5 US Treasury Note 2.500% Due 05/15/2024 1,750,000.00 06/10/2019 1.91% 1,798,261.72 1,792,792.06 103.47 1.67% 1,810,772.25 5,649.04 0.87% 17,980.19 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.38 4.13 9128282N9 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 07/31/2024 2,000,000.00 08/30/2019 1.44% 2,064,531.25 2,060,078.34 101.95 1.68% 2,038,906.00 17,785.33 0.99% (21,172.34) Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.59 4.32 912828YH7 US Treasury Note 1.500% Due 09/30/2024 3,500,000.00 Various 1.65% 3,474,941.41 3,475,459.80 99.17 1.68% 3,470,880.00 13,340.16 1.67% (4,579.80) Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.75 4.55 9128283J7 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 11/30/2024 3,000,000.00 Various 1.76% 3,051,650.40 3,051,187.23 102.04 1.69% 3,061,290.00 5,573.77 1.47% 10,102.77 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.92 4.65 TOTAL US Treasury 65,000,000.00 1.99% 64,499,634.97 64,806,527.64 1.63% 65,485,134.50 262,991.34 31.57% 678,606.86 Aaa / AA+ Aaa 2.64 2.54 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 204,348,556.60 2.19% 204,329,154.55 204,640,299.60 1.75% 207,233,056.82 996,434.53 100.00% 2,592,757.22 Aa1 / AA Aaa 2.69 2.42 TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 208,229,491.35 As of December 31, 2019 35 4.4.a Packet Pg. 313 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Holdings Report City of Dublin Reporting Account -Account #10219 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration LAIF 90LAIF$00 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 49,367,485.67 Various 2.03% 49,367,485.67 49,367,485.67 1.00 2.03% 49,367,485.67 263,314.31 53.80% 0.00 NR / NR NR 0.00 0.00 TOTAL LAIF 49,367,485.67 2.03% 49,367,485.67 49,367,485.67 2.03% 49,367,485.67 263,314.31 53.80% 0.00 NR / NR NR 0.00 0.00 Local Gov Investment Pool 90CAMP$00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 42,618,198.31 Various 1.77% 42,618,198.31 42,618,198.31 1.00 1.77% 42,618,198.31 0.00 46.20% 0.00 NR / AAA NR 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Local Gov Investment Pool 42,618,198.31 1.77% 42,618,198.31 42,618,198.31 1.77% 42,618,198.31 0.00 46.20% 0.00 NR / AAA NR 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 91,985,683.98 1.91% 91,985,683.98 91,985,683.98 1.91% 91,985,683.98 263,314.31 100.00% 0.00 NR / AAA NR 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 92,248,998.29 As of December 31, 2019 36 4.4.a Packet Pg. 314 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) SECTION |Section 5 |Transactions 37 4.4.a Packet Pg. 315 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger City of Dublin -Account #10198 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 10/11/2019 3130A2UW4 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note 2.875% Due: 09/13/2024 106.101 1.58%2,122,020.00 4,472.22 2,126,492.22 0.00 Purchase 10/23/2019 65479JAD5 1,580,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3 1.93% Due: 07/15/2024 99.995 1.94%1,579,916.58 0.00 1,579,916.58 0.00 Purchase 10/28/2019 912828YH7 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.5% Due: 09/30/2024 99.449 1.62%1,491,738.28 1,721.31 1,493,459.59 0.00 Purchase 11/12/2019 3135G0W66 2,000,000.00 FNMA Note 1.625% Due: 10/15/2024 99.170 1.80%1,983,400.00 2,166.67 1,985,566.67 0.00 Purchase 11/19/2019 62479LDQ5 4,140,000.00 MUFG Bank Ltd Discount CP 1.9% Due: 04/24/2020 99.171 1.94%4,105,695.50 0.00 4,105,695.50 0.00 Purchase 12/09/2019 912828YH7 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.5% Due: 09/30/2024 99.160 1.68%1,983,203.13 5,737.70 1,988,940.83 0.00 Purchase 12/13/2019 9128283J7 2,250,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due: 11/30/2024 101.723 1.76%2,288,759.77 1,698.26 2,290,458.03 0.00 Purchase 12/24/2019 9128283J7 750,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due: 11/30/2024 101.719 1.76%762,890.63 1,045.08 763,935.71 0.00 Subtotal 16,220,000.00 16,317,623.89 16,841.24 16,334,465.13 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 16,220,000.00 16,317,623.89 16,841.24 16,334,465.13 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 11/12/2019 3135G0A78 2,000,000.00 FNMA Note 1.625% Due: 01/21/2020 100.006 1.59%2,000,120.00 10,020.83 2,010,140.83 -543.58 Sale 12/13/2019 912828H52 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.25% Due: 01/31/2020 99.957 1.57%999,570.31 4,585.60 1,004,155.91 -69.15 Subtotal 3,000,000.00 2,999,690.31 14,606.43 3,014,296.74 -612.73 Maturity 10/02/2019 3137EADM8 2,500,000.00 FHLMC Note 1.25% Due: 10/02/2019 100.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 September 30, 2019 through December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2019 38 4.4.a Packet Pg. 316 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger City of Dublin -Account #10198 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss Maturity 10/08/2019 68389XAX3 1,250,000.00 Oracle Corp Note 2.25% Due: 10/08/2019 100.000 1,250,000.00 0.00 1,250,000.00 0.00 Maturity 11/13/2019 40428HPN6 1,000,000.00 HSBC USA Inc Note 2.375% Due: 11/13/2019 100.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 11/19/2019 62479MYK3 4,140,000.00 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Discount CP 2.12% Due: 11/19/2019 99.464 4,140,000.00 0.00 4,140,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 8,890,000.00 8,890,000.00 0.00 8,890,000.00 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 11,890,000.00 11,889,690.31 14,606.43 11,904,296.74 -612.73 September 30, 2019 through December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2019 39 4.4.a Packet Pg. 317 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger City of Dublin Reporting Account -Account #10219 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 10/31/2019 90CAMP$00 54,824.84 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2.00%54,824.84 0.00 54,824.84 0.00 Purchase 11/30/2019 90CAMP$00 39,139.04 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1.84%39,139.04 0.00 39,139.04 0.00 Purchase 12/31/2019 90CAMP$00 45,007.40 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1.77%45,007.40 0.00 45,007.40 0.00 Subtotal 138,971.28 138,971.28 0.00 138,971.28 0.00 Security Contribution 12/19/2019 90CAMP$00 22,500,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 22,500,000.00 0.00 22,500,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 22,500,000.00 22,500,000.00 0.00 22,500,000.00 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 22,638,971.28 22,638,971.28 0.00 22,638,971.28 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Security Withdrawal 10/25/2019 90CAMP$00 1,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 11/05/2019 90CAMP$00 2,700,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,700,000.00 0.00 2,700,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 11/15/2019 90CAMP$00 2,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 11/19/2019 90CAMP$00 3,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 September 30, 2019 through December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2019 40 4.4.a Packet Pg. 318 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger City of Dublin Reporting Account -Account #10219 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss Security Withdrawal 11/22/2019 90CAMP$00 3,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 11,700,000.00 11,700,000.00 0.00 11,700,000.00 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 11,700,000.00 11,700,000.00 0.00 11,700,000.00 0.00 September 30, 2019 through December 31, 2019 As of December 31, 2019 41 4.4.a Packet Pg. 319 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Important Disclosures 2019 Chandler Asset Management,Inc, An Independent Registered Investment Adviser. Information contained herein is confidential.Prices are provided by IDC,an independent pricing source.In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value,Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures.Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A. Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return.The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results.These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings.Past performance may not be indicative of future results.Therefore,clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels.All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss.Economic factors,market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio. Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions.Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee,the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results.It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Source ice Data Indices,LLC ("ICE"),used with permission. ICE permits use of the ICE indices and related data on an "as is"basis; ICE,its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers disclaim any and all warranties and representations, express and/or implied,including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use,including the indices,index data and any data included in,related to,or derived therefrom.Neither ICE data,its affiliates or their respective third party providers guarantee the quality,adequacy,accuracy,timeliness or completeness of the indices or the index data or any component thereof,and the indices and index data and all components thereof are provided on an "as is"basis and licensee's use it at licensee's own risk. ICE data,its affiliates and their respective third party do not sponsor,endorse,or recommend chandler asset management,or any of its products or services. This report is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a specific investment or legal advice.The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication,but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice.Any opinions or views expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change.This report may contain forecasts and forward-looking statements which are inherently limited and should not be relied upon as indicator of future results.Past performance is not indicative of future results.This report is not intended to constitute an offer,solicitation,recommendation or advice regarding any securities or investment strategy and should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment. Fixed income investments are subject to interest, credit and market risk.Interest rate risk:the value of fixed income investments will decline as interest rates rise.Credit risk:the possibility that the borrower may not be able to repay interest and principal.Low rated bonds generally have to pay higher interest rates to attract investors willing to take on greater risk.Market risk:the bond market in general could decline due to economic conditions,especially during periods of rising interest rates. Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s,S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Security level ratings for U.S.Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”)reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated.The issuing U.S.Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a AA+/Aaa/AAA by S&P,Moody’s and Fitch respectively. As of December 31, 2019 42 4.4.a Packet Pg. 320 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Benchmark Disclosures ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index The ICE BAML 1-5 Year US Treasury &Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market.Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s,S&P and Fitch).Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than five years remaining term to final maturity,at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance,a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies.(Index:GVA0.Please visit www.mlindex.ml.com for more information) The ICE BAML 1-3 Year US Treasury &Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market.Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s,S&P and Fitch).Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three years remaining term to final maturity,at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance,a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies.(Index:G1A0.Please visit www.mlindex.ml.com for more information) As of December 31, 2019 43 4.4.a Packet Pg. 321 At t a c h m e n t : Q 2 R e d u c e d ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of October 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 10/01/2019 31846V203 6,131.35 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%6,131.35 0.00 6,131.35 0.00 Purchase 10/02/2019 31846V203 2,500,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 Purchase 10/02/2019 31846V203 15,625.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%15,625.00 0.00 15,625.00 0.00 Purchase 10/05/2019 31846V203 30,468.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%30,468.75 0.00 30,468.75 0.00 Purchase 10/07/2019 31846V203 13,750.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%13,750.00 0.00 13,750.00 0.00 Purchase 10/08/2019 31846V203 1,250,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%1,250,000.00 0.00 1,250,000.00 0.00 Purchase 10/08/2019 31846V203 14,062.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%14,062.50 0.00 14,062.50 0.00 Purchase 10/11/2019 3130A2UW4 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note 2.875% Due 9/13/2024 106.101 1.58%2,122,020.00 4,472.22 2,126,492.22 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 1,141.59 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%1,141.59 0.00 1,141.59 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 4,068.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%4,068.17 0.00 4,068.17 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 2,861.88 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%2,861.88 0.00 2,861.88 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 3,111.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%3,111.00 0.00 3,111.00 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 3,975.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%3,975.00 0.00 3,975.00 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 1,814.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%1,814.50 0.00 1,814.50 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 2,058.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%2,058.33 0.00 2,058.33 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 1,475.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%1,475.00 0.00 1,475.00 0.00 Execution Time: 11/8/2019 11:00:53 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11 4.4.b Packet Pg. 322 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of October 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 20,321.49 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%20,321.49 0.00 20,321.49 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 124,916.16 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%124,916.16 0.00 124,916.16 0.00 Purchase 10/15/2019 31846V203 109,917.01 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%109,917.01 0.00 109,917.01 0.00 Purchase 10/18/2019 31846V203 1,530.08 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%1,530.08 0.00 1,530.08 0.00 Purchase 10/18/2019 31846V203 3,723.96 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%3,723.96 0.00 3,723.96 0.00 Purchase 10/21/2019 31846V203 3,343.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%3,343.33 0.00 3,343.33 0.00 Purchase 10/23/2019 65479JAD5 1,580,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3 1.93% Due 7/15/2024 99.995 1.94%1,579,916.58 0.00 1,579,916.58 0.00 Purchase 10/28/2019 912828YH7 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.5% Due 9/30/2024 99.449 1.62%1,491,738.28 1,721.31 1,493,459.59 0.00 Purchase 10/30/2019 31846V203 24,062.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%24,062.50 0.00 24,062.50 0.00 Purchase 10/31/2019 31846V203 43,750.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%43,750.00 0.00 43,750.00 0.00 Purchase 10/31/2019 90CAMP$00 54,824.84 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2.00%54,824.84 0.00 54,824.84 0.00 Subtotal 9,316,932.44 9,430,607.30 6,193.53 9,436,800.83 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 9,316,932.44 9,430,607.30 6,193.53 9,436,800.83 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 10/11/2019 31846V203 2,126,492.22 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%2,126,492.22 0.00 2,126,492.22 0.00 Execution Time: 11/8/2019 11:00:53 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12 4.4.b Packet Pg. 323 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of October 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Sale 10/23/2019 31846V203 1,579,916.58 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%1,579,916.58 0.00 1,579,916.58 0.00 Sale 10/28/2019 31846V203 1,493,459.59 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.57%1,493,459.59 0.00 1,493,459.59 0.00 Subtotal 5,199,868.39 5,199,868.39 0.00 5,199,868.39 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 02582JHE3 0.00 American Express Credit Trust 2017-3 A 1.77% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 1,475.00 1,475.00 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 43815NAB0 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A2 1.9% Due 4/15/2022 100.000 0.00 2,058.33 2,058.33 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 477870AB5 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A2 2.28% Due 5/16/2022 100.000 0.00 1,814.50 1,814.50 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 47788BAD6 20,004.12 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 1.82% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 20,004.12 317.37 20,321.49 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 47788CAC6 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-A A3 2.66% Due 4/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,141.59 1,141.59 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 47788EAC2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 3.08% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 4,068.17 4,068.17 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 47789JAB2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 2.85% Due 12/15/2021 100.000 0.00 2,861.88 2,861.88 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 65479GAD1 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B A3 3.06% Due 3/15/2023 100.000 0.00 3,111.00 3,111.00 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 89231PAD0 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D A3 3.18% Due 3/15/2023 100.000 0.00 3,975.00 3,975.00 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 89238BAB8 124,459.13 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-A A2A 2.1% Due 10/15/2020 100.000 124,459.13 457.03 124,916.16 0.00 Paydown 10/15/2019 89239AAB9 106,768.64 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A A2A 2.83% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 106,768.64 3,148.37 109,917.01 0.00 Execution Time: 11/8/2019 11:00:53 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13 4.4.b Packet Pg. 324 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of October 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Paydown 10/18/2019 43814UAG4 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 A3 3.01% Due 5/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,530.08 1,530.08 0.00 Paydown 10/18/2019 43814WAB1 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 A2 2.75% Due 9/20/2021 100.000 0.00 3,723.96 3,723.96 0.00 Paydown 10/21/2019 43815HAC1 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3 2.95% Due 8/22/2022 100.000 0.00 3,343.33 3,343.33 0.00 Subtotal 251,231.89 251,231.89 33,025.61 284,257.50 0.00 Maturity 10/02/2019 3137EADM8 2,500,000.00 FHLMC Note 1.25% Due 10/2/2019 100.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 Maturity 10/08/2019 68389XAX3 1,250,000.00 Oracle Corp Note 2.25% Due 10/8/2019 100.000 1,250,000.00 0.00 1,250,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 3,750,000.00 3,750,000.00 0.00 3,750,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 10/24/2019 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 Security Withdrawal 10/25/2019 90CAMP$00 1,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 1,000,104.17 1,000,104.17 0.00 1,000,104.17 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 10,201,204.45 10,201,204.45 33,025.61 10,234,230.06 0.00 OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 10/02/2019 3137EADM8 2,500,000.00 FHLMC Note 1.25% Due 10/2/2019 0.000 15,625.00 0.00 15,625.00 0.00 Interest 10/05/2019 3135G0T45 3,250,000.00 FNMA Note 1.875% Due 4/5/2022 0.000 30,468.75 0.00 30,468.75 0.00 Interest 10/07/2019 3135G0Q89 2,000,000.00 FNMA Note 1.375% Due 10/7/2021 0.000 13,750.00 0.00 13,750.00 0.00 Interest 10/08/2019 68389XAX3 1,250,000.00 Oracle Corp Note 2.25% Due 10/8/2019 0.000 14,062.50 0.00 14,062.50 0.00 Execution Time: 11/8/2019 11:00:53 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14 4.4.b Packet Pg. 325 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of October 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 10/30/2019 912828WZ9 2,750,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due 4/30/2022 0.000 24,062.50 0.00 24,062.50 0.00 Interest 10/31/2019 912828L99 5,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.375% Due 10/31/2020 0.000 34,375.00 0.00 34,375.00 0.00 Interest 10/31/2019 912828M49 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.875% Due 10/31/2022 0.000 9,375.00 0.00 9,375.00 0.00 Subtotal 17,750,000.00 141,718.75 0.00 141,718.75 0.00 Dividend 10/01/2019 31846V203 2,638,644.76 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 0.000 6,131.35 0.00 6,131.35 0.00 Dividend 10/15/2019 90LAIF$00 4,509,642,181.94 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 0.000 302,227.54 0.00 302,227.54 0.00 Dividend 10/31/2019 90CAMP$00 30,679,227.03 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 0.000 54,824.84 0.00 54,824.84 0.00 Subtotal 4,542,960,053.73 363,183.73 0.00 363,183.73 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 4,560,710,053.73 504,902.48 0.00 504,902.48 0.00 Execution Time: 11/8/2019 11:00:53 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 15 4.4.b Packet Pg. 326 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of November 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 11/01/2019 31846V203 5,262.90 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%5,262.90 0.00 5,262.90 0.00 Purchase 11/03/2019 31846V203 23,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%23,000.00 0.00 23,000.00 0.00 Purchase 11/11/2019 31846V203 59,700.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%59,700.00 0.00 59,700.00 0.00 Purchase 11/12/2019 3135G0W66 2,000,000.00 FNMA Note 1.625% Due 10/15/2024 99.170 1.80%1,983,400.00 2,166.67 1,985,566.67 0.00 Purchase 11/12/2019 31846V203 24,574.16 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%24,574.16 0.00 24,574.16 0.00 Purchase 11/13/2019 31846V203 1,000,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Purchase 11/13/2019 31846V203 11,875.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%11,875.00 0.00 11,875.00 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 21,875.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%21,875.00 0.00 21,875.00 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 4,068.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%4,068.17 0.00 4,068.17 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 1,475.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%1,475.00 0.00 1,475.00 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 2,058.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%2,058.33 0.00 2,058.33 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 1,814.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%1,814.50 0.00 1,814.50 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 3,111.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%3,111.00 0.00 3,111.00 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 1,863.52 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%1,863.52 0.00 1,863.52 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 3,975.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%3,975.00 0.00 3,975.00 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 22,509.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%22,509.75 0.00 22,509.75 0.00 Execution Time: 12/17/2019 11:53:45 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10 4.4.b Packet Pg. 327 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of November 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 54,074.24 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%54,074.24 0.00 54,074.24 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 94,802.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%94,802.50 0.00 94,802.50 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 125,006.92 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%125,006.92 0.00 125,006.92 0.00 Purchase 11/15/2019 31846V203 112,905.42 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%112,905.42 0.00 112,905.42 0.00 Purchase 11/16/2019 31846V203 10,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%10,500.00 0.00 10,500.00 0.00 Purchase 11/17/2019 31846V203 22,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Purchase 11/18/2019 31846V203 17,110.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%17,110.00 0.00 17,110.00 0.00 Purchase 11/18/2019 31846V203 1,530.08 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%1,530.08 0.00 1,530.08 0.00 Purchase 11/18/2019 31846V203 98,366.40 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%98,366.40 0.00 98,366.40 0.00 Purchase 11/19/2019 31846V203 4,140,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%4,140,000.00 0.00 4,140,000.00 0.00 Purchase 11/19/2019 31846V203 17,550.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%17,550.00 0.00 17,550.00 0.00 Purchase 11/19/2019 62479LDQ5 4,140,000.00 MUFG Bank Ltd Discount CP 1.9% Due 4/24/2020 99.171 1.94%4,105,695.50 0.00 4,105,695.50 0.00 Purchase 11/20/2019 31846V203 22,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Purchase 11/21/2019 31846V203 3,343.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%3,343.33 0.00 3,343.33 0.00 Purchase 11/30/2019 31846V203 141,562.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%141,562.50 0.00 141,562.50 0.00 Execution Time: 12/17/2019 11:53:45 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11 4.4.b Packet Pg. 328 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of November 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 11/30/2019 90CAMP$00 39,139.04 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1.84%39,139.04 0.00 39,139.04 0.00 Subtotal 12,228,052.76 12,177,148.26 2,166.67 12,179,314.93 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 12,228,052.76 12,177,148.26 2,166.67 12,179,314.93 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 11/12/2019 3135G0A78 2,000,000.00 FNMA Note 1.625% Due 1/21/2020 100.006 1.59%2,000,120.00 10,020.83 2,010,140.83 -543.58 Sale 11/19/2019 31846V203 4,105,695.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.44%4,105,695.50 0.00 4,105,695.50 0.00 Subtotal 6,105,695.50 6,105,815.50 10,020.83 6,115,836.33 -543.58 Paydown 11/15/2019 02582JHE3 0.00 American Express Credit Trust 2017-3 A 1.77% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 1,475.00 1,475.00 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 43815NAB0 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A2 1.9% Due 4/15/2022 100.000 0.00 2,058.33 2,058.33 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 477870AB5 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A2 2.28% Due 5/16/2022 100.000 0.00 1,814.50 1,814.50 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 47788BAD6 22,222.72 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 1.82% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 22,222.72 287.03 22,509.75 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 47788CAC6 52,932.65 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-A A3 2.66% Due 4/18/2022 100.000 52,932.65 1,141.59 54,074.24 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 47788EAC2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 3.08% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 4,068.17 4,068.17 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 47789JAB2 91,940.62 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 2.85% Due 12/15/2021 100.000 91,940.62 2,861.88 94,802.50 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 65479GAD1 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B A3 3.06% Due 3/15/2023 100.000 0.00 3,111.00 3,111.00 0.00 Execution Time: 12/17/2019 11:53:45 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12 4.4.b Packet Pg. 329 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of November 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Paydown 11/15/2019 65479JAD5 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3 1.93% Due 7/15/2024 100.000 0.00 1,863.52 1,863.52 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 89231PAD0 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D A3 3.18% Due 3/15/2023 100.000 0.00 3,975.00 3,975.00 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 89238BAB8 124,767.70 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-A A2A 2.1% Due 10/15/2020 100.000 124,767.70 239.22 125,006.92 0.00 Paydown 11/15/2019 89239AAB9 110,008.85 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A A2A 2.83% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 110,008.85 2,896.57 112,905.42 0.00 Paydown 11/18/2019 43814UAG4 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 A3 3.01% Due 5/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,530.08 1,530.08 0.00 Paydown 11/18/2019 43814WAB1 94,642.44 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 A2 2.75% Due 9/20/2021 100.000 94,642.44 3,723.96 98,366.40 0.00 Paydown 11/21/2019 43815HAC1 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3 2.95% Due 8/22/2022 100.000 0.00 3,343.33 3,343.33 0.00 Subtotal 496,514.98 496,514.98 34,389.18 530,904.16 0.00 Maturity 11/13/2019 40428HPN6 1,000,000.00 HSBC USA Inc Note 2.375% Due 11/13/2019 100.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 11/19/2019 62479MYK3 4,140,000.00 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Discount CP 2.12% Due 11/19/2019 99.464 4,140,000.00 0.00 4,140,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 5,140,000.00 5,140,000.00 0.00 5,140,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 11/05/2019 90CAMP$00 2,700,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,700,000.00 0.00 2,700,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 11/15/2019 90CAMP$00 2,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 11/19/2019 90CAMP$00 3,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 Execution Time: 12/17/2019 11:53:45 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13 4.4.b Packet Pg. 330 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of November 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Security Withdrawal 11/22/2019 90CAMP$00 3,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 11/25/2019 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 Subtotal 10,700,104.17 10,700,104.17 0.00 10,700,104.17 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 22,442,314.65 22,442,434.65 44,410.01 22,486,844.66 -543.58 OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 11/03/2019 00440EAT4 2,000,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 10/3/2020 2.3% Due 11/3/2020 0.000 23,000.00 0.00 23,000.00 0.00 Interest 11/11/2019 037833CU2 3,000,000.00 Apple Inc Callable Note Cont 3/11/2024 2.85% Due 5/11/2024 0.000 42,750.00 0.00 42,750.00 0.00 Interest 11/11/2019 369550BE7 1,130,000.00 General Dynamics Corp Note 3% Due 5/11/2021 0.000 16,950.00 0.00 16,950.00 0.00 Interest 11/13/2019 40428HPN6 1,000,000.00 HSBC USA Inc Note 2.375% Due 11/13/2019 0.000 11,875.00 0.00 11,875.00 0.00 Interest 11/15/2019 912828WJ5 1,750,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.5% Due 5/15/2024 0.000 21,875.00 0.00 21,875.00 0.00 Interest 11/16/2019 166764BG4 1,000,000.00 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 4/15/2021 2.1% Due 5/16/2021 0.000 10,500.00 0.00 10,500.00 0.00 Interest 11/17/2019 3137EAEK1 2,400,000.00 FHLMC Note 1.875% Due 11/17/2020 0.000 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Interest 11/18/2019 46625HRL6 500,000.00 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont 3/18/2023 2.7% Due 5/18/2023 0.000 6,750.00 0.00 6,750.00 0.00 Interest 11/18/2019 58933YAF2 740,000.00 Merck & Co Note 2.8% Due 5/18/2023 0.000 10,360.00 0.00 10,360.00 0.00 Interest 11/19/2019 857477AV5 1,800,000.00 State Street Bank Note 1.95% Due 5/19/2021 0.000 17,550.00 0.00 17,550.00 0.00 Execution Time: 12/17/2019 11:53:45 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14 4.4.b Packet Pg. 331 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of November 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 11/20/2019 747525AD5 2,000,000.00 Qualcomm Inc Note 2.25% Due 5/20/2020 0.000 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Interest 11/30/2019 3135G0F73 2,500,000.00 FNMA Note 1.5% Due 11/30/2020 0.000 18,750.00 0.00 18,750.00 0.00 Interest 11/30/2019 912828R69 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due 5/31/2023 0.000 12,187.50 0.00 12,187.50 0.00 Interest 11/30/2019 912828U57 5,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 11/30/2023 0.000 53,125.00 0.00 53,125.00 0.00 Interest 11/30/2019 912828U65 2,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due 11/30/2021 0.000 21,875.00 0.00 21,875.00 0.00 Interest 11/30/2019 912828XE5 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.5% Due 5/31/2020 0.000 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Interest 11/30/2019 912828XR6 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due 5/31/2022 0.000 13,125.00 0.00 13,125.00 0.00 Subtotal 33,320,000.00 348,172.50 0.00 348,172.50 0.00 Dividend 11/01/2019 31846V203 1,620,779.80 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 0.000 5,262.90 0.00 5,262.90 0.00 Dividend 11/22/2019 90CAMP$00 23,034,051.87 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 0.000 39,139.04 0.00 39,139.04 0.00 Subtotal 24,654,831.67 44,401.94 0.00 44,401.94 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 57,974,831.67 392,574.44 0.00 392,574.44 0.00 Execution Time: 12/17/2019 11:53:45 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 15 4.4.b Packet Pg. 332 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 12/02/2019 31846V203 2,760.01 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%2,760.01 0.00 2,760.01 0.00 Purchase 12/08/2019 31846V203 123,050.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%123,050.00 0.00 123,050.00 0.00 Purchase 12/09/2019 31846V203 24,375.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%24,375.00 0.00 24,375.00 0.00 Purchase 12/09/2019 912828YH7 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.5% Due 9/30/2024 99.160 1.68%1,983,203.13 5,737.70 1,988,940.83 0.00 Purchase 12/11/2019 31846V203 28,125.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%28,125.00 0.00 28,125.00 0.00 Purchase 12/12/2019 31846V203 17,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 0.00 Purchase 12/13/2019 9128283J7 2,250,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 11/30/2024 101.723 1.76%2,288,759.77 1,698.26 2,290,458.03 0.00 Purchase 12/14/2019 31846V203 54,553.13 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%54,553.13 0.00 54,553.13 0.00 Purchase 12/15/2019 31846V203 22,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 3,975.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%3,975.00 0.00 3,975.00 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 2,541.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%2,541.17 0.00 2,541.17 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 3,111.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%3,111.00 0.00 3,111.00 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 4,068.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%4,068.17 0.00 4,068.17 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 1,814.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%1,814.50 0.00 1,814.50 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 2,058.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%2,058.33 0.00 2,058.33 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 1,475.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%1,475.00 0.00 1,475.00 0.00 Execution Time: 1/16/2020 11:20:36 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10 4.4.b Packet Pg. 333 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 13,662.66 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%13,662.66 0.00 13,662.66 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 35,260.01 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%35,260.01 0.00 35,260.01 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 94,994.21 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%94,994.21 0.00 94,994.21 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 11,952.25 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%11,952.25 0.00 11,952.25 0.00 Purchase 12/16/2019 31846V203 103,215.76 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%103,215.76 0.00 103,215.76 0.00 Purchase 12/18/2019 31846V203 1,530.08 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%1,530.08 0.00 1,530.08 0.00 Purchase 12/18/2019 31846V203 132,975.96 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%132,975.96 0.00 132,975.96 0.00 Purchase 12/19/2019 31846V203 27,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%27,500.00 0.00 27,500.00 0.00 Purchase 12/23/2019 31846V203 3,343.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%3,343.33 0.00 3,343.33 0.00 Purchase 12/24/2019 31846V203 29,205.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%29,205.00 0.00 29,205.00 0.00 Purchase 12/24/2019 9128283J7 750,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 11/30/2024 101.719 1.76%762,890.63 1,045.08 763,935.71 0.00 Purchase 12/26/2019 31846V203 23,460.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%23,460.00 0.00 23,460.00 0.00 Purchase 12/27/2019 31846V203 18,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%18,000.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 Purchase 12/31/2019 31846V203 26,250.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.20%26,250.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00 Purchase 12/31/2019 90CAMP$00 45,007.40 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1.77%45,007.40 0.00 45,007.40 0.00 Subtotal 5,858,262.97 5,893,116.50 8,481.04 5,901,597.54 0.00 Execution Time: 1/16/2020 11:20:36 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11 4.4.b Packet Pg. 334 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Security Contribution 12/19/2019 90CAMP$00 22,500,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 22,500,000.00 0.00 22,500,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 22,500,000.00 22,500,000.00 0.00 22,500,000.00 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 28,358,262.97 28,393,116.50 8,481.04 28,401,597.54 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 12/09/2019 31846V203 1,988,940.83 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%1,988,940.83 0.00 1,988,940.83 0.00 Sale 12/13/2019 31846V203 1,286,302.12 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%1,286,302.12 0.00 1,286,302.12 0.00 Sale 12/13/2019 912828H52 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.25% Due 1/31/2020 99.957 1.57%999,570.31 4,585.60 1,004,155.91 -69.15 Sale 12/24/2019 31846V203 763,935.71 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.26%763,935.71 0.00 763,935.71 0.00 Subtotal 5,039,178.66 5,038,748.97 4,585.60 5,043,334.57 -69.15 Paydown 12/16/2019 02582JHE3 0.00 American Express Credit Trust 2017-3 A 1.77% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 1,475.00 1,475.00 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 43815NAB0 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A2 1.9% Due 4/15/2022 100.000 0.00 2,058.33 2,058.33 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 477870AB5 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A2 2.28% Due 5/16/2022 100.000 0.00 1,814.50 1,814.50 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 47788BAD6 13,409.34 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 1.82% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 13,409.34 253.32 13,662.66 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 47788CAC6 34,235.76 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-A A3 2.66% Due 4/18/2022 100.000 34,235.76 1,024.25 35,260.01 0.00 Execution Time: 1/16/2020 11:20:36 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12 4.4.b Packet Pg. 335 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Paydown 12/16/2019 47788EAC2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 3.08% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 4,068.17 4,068.17 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 47789JAB2 92,350.69 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 2.85% Due 12/15/2021 100.000 92,350.69 2,643.52 94,994.21 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 65479GAD1 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B A3 3.06% Due 3/15/2023 100.000 0.00 3,111.00 3,111.00 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 65479JAD5 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3 1.93% Due 7/15/2024 100.000 0.00 2,541.17 2,541.17 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 89231PAD0 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D A3 3.18% Due 3/15/2023 100.000 0.00 3,975.00 3,975.00 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 89238BAB8 11,931.37 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-A A2A 2.1% Due 10/15/2020 100.000 11,931.37 20.88 11,952.25 0.00 Paydown 12/16/2019 89239AAB9 100,578.62 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A A2A 2.83% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 100,578.62 2,637.14 103,215.76 0.00 Paydown 12/18/2019 43814UAG4 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 A3 3.01% Due 5/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,530.08 1,530.08 0.00 Paydown 12/18/2019 43814WAB1 129,468.89 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 A2 2.75% Due 9/20/2021 100.000 129,468.89 3,507.07 132,975.96 0.00 Paydown 12/23/2019 43815HAC1 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3 2.95% Due 8/22/2022 100.000 0.00 3,343.33 3,343.33 0.00 Subtotal 381,974.67 381,974.67 34,002.76 415,977.43 0.00 Execution Time: 1/16/2020 11:20:36 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13 4.4.b Packet Pg. 336 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Security Withdrawal 12/23/2019 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 Subtotal 104.17 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 5,421,257.50 5,420,827.81 38,588.36 5,459,416.17 -69.15 OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 12/08/2019 3130A0F70 5,000,000.00 FHLB Note 3.375% Due 12/8/2023 0.000 84,375.00 0.00 84,375.00 0.00 Interest 12/08/2019 69353RFL7 2,210,000.00 PNC Bank Callable Note Cont 5/9/2023 3.5% Due 6/8/2023 0.000 38,675.00 0.00 38,675.00 0.00 Interest 12/09/2019 313383QR5 1,500,000.00 FHLB Note 3.25% Due 6/9/2023 0.000 24,375.00 0.00 24,375.00 0.00 Interest 12/11/2019 313379RB7 3,000,000.00 FHLB Note 1.875% Due 6/11/2021 0.000 28,125.00 0.00 28,125.00 0.00 Interest 12/12/2019 313383HU8 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note 1.75% Due 6/12/2020 0.000 17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 0.00 Interest 12/14/2019 3130A1XJ2 3,795,000.00 FHLB Note 2.875% Due 6/14/2024 0.000 54,553.13 0.00 54,553.13 0.00 Interest 12/15/2019 097023BQ7 2,400,000.00 Boeing Co Callable Note Cont 4/15/2023 1.875% Due 6/15/2023 0.000 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Interest 12/19/2019 3137EAEN5 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Note 2.75% Due 6/19/2023 0.000 27,500.00 0.00 27,500.00 0.00 Interest 12/24/2019 166764AH3 1,000,000.00 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 3/24/2023 3.191% Due 6/24/2023 0.000 15,955.00 0.00 15,955.00 0.00 Interest 12/24/2019 24422ETT6 1,000,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note 2.65% Due 6/24/2024 0.000 13,250.00 0.00 13,250.00 0.00 Execution Time: 1/16/2020 11:20:36 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14 4.4.b Packet Pg. 337 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 12/26/2019 931142EK5 1,380,000.00 Wal-Mart Stores Callable Note Cont 5/26/2023 3.4% Due 6/26/2023 0.000 23,460.00 0.00 23,460.00 0.00 Interest 12/27/2019 02665WCZ2 1,500,000.00 American Honda Finance Note 2.4% Due 6/27/2024 0.000 18,000.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 Interest 12/31/2019 912828XW5 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due 6/30/2022 0.000 26,250.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00 Subtotal 29,785,000.00 394,518.13 0.00 394,518.13 0.00 Dividend 12/02/2019 31846V203 3,422,331.35 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 0.000 2,760.01 0.00 2,760.01 0.00 Dividend 12/31/2019 90CAMP$00 42,573,190.91 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 0.000 45,007.40 0.00 45,007.40 0.00 Subtotal 45,995,522.26 47,767.41 0.00 47,767.41 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 75,780,522.26 442,285.54 0.00 442,285.54 0.00 Execution Time: 1/16/2020 11:20:36 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 15 4.4.b Packet Pg. 338 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . T r a n s a c t i o n L e d g e r - O c t o b e r - D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 ( Q 2 2 0 2 0 - I n v e s t m e n t R e p o r t ) Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Revisions to the Personnel System Prepared by: Angelica Smith, Senior Management Analyst EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider proposed changes to the City’s current Personnel System. The proposed adjustments are based on the need to revise the City’s Classification Plan, Salary Plan and Management Leave and Benefit Plans for new positions exempt from competitive service. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the following: 1) Resolution Amending the Classification Plan; 2) Resolution Amending the Salary Plan for Management Positions Exempt from Competitive Service; 3) Resolution Amending the Salary Plan for Part-Time Personnel; and 4) Resolution Amending the Management Positions Exempt from Competitive Service Resolution and Prescribing Leave Benefits for the Designated Positions. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed changes to the Personnel System , if approved by the City Council, will not require a budget adjustment. There are no financial impacts of updating Part -Time job classifications in Fiscal Year 2019-20. The addition of two Manager job classifications is proposed to take effect on July 1, 2020 and will and will be reflected in the proposed Fiscal Year 2020-21 budgeted position allocation plan. DESCRIPTION: CLASSIFICATION PLAN AMENDMENT: Pursuant to the City’s Personnel System Rules, a job description must be adopted for each classification in the organization. The job description typically includes key elements, knowledge, skills, abilities, and requirements of the position. The job descriptions make up the City’s Classification Plan. 4.5 Packet Pg. 339 Page 2 of 3 Communications Manager/Human Resources Manager The City Manager proposes the creation of the Communications Manager position to oversee the City’s internal and external communications program, which supports the City Manager’s plan for improved services to the community. The creation of the Human Resources Manager supports anticipated staffing changes in the City’s organization and provides for a seamless transition in the Human Resources division. Based on recent/anticipated employment separations and a review of the current and future needs of the City Manager’s Office, the City Manager has determined that the above modifications to the Classification Plan are necessary. Part-Time, Temporary Job Classifications The revisions to the Part-Time, temporary/seasonal job classifications is proposed to increase efficiencies in the management of Part-Time personnel and to address staffing challenges in all recreational programming area. The proposed broader job classifications help to streamline City recruitment, offers greater opportunities for cross training, and provides Parks and Community Services staff with greater flexibility to move and assign Part-Time employees across various program areas as required. The proposed revisions eliminate 24 Part-Time job classifications and consolidate related positions into five job classifications as follows: Eliminated PT Job Classification Consolidated & Amended PT Job Classifications Customer Service Assistant I Customer Service Assistant II Customer Service Assistant Lifeguard I, Lifeguard II, Lifeguard/Swim Instructor I, Lifeguard/Swim Instructor II, Swim Instructor I, Swim Instructor II Lifeguard/Swim Instructor Aquatics Program Specialist, Lead Preschool Teacher, Pool Manager Program Specialist Cashier, Facility Attendant I, Preschool Aide, Recreation Leader I Recreation Aide Facility Attendant II, Preschool Teacher, Recreation Leader II, Senior Facility Attendant, Senior Recreation Leader Recreation Leader Assistant Pool Manager (eliminated) Assistant Swim Lesson Manager (eliminated) Recreation Driver (moved to contract service) Sports Official (moved to contract service) The City Manager is proposing that the above Job Classifications be created, eliminated, and/or amended as described in the attached Resolution (Attachment 1) to align with current and future staffing needs of the City. SALARY PLAN AMENDMENT: Included in the City’s Personnel System are Resolutions that address salary ranges for Part-Time personnel and management positions exempt from competitive service. The attached Resolution (Attachment 2) is a proposed amendment to the City’s Salary Plan 4.5 Packet Pg. 340 Page 3 of 3 for the inclusion of the following positions: Communications Manager and Human Resources Manager. The salary ranges for the Communications Manager and Human Resources Manager were determined based on a market assessment of comparable positions in similar agencies and then aligned internally within the City classification plan of related jobs in terms of scope and requirements to establish pay equity within the City’s Salary Plan. Attachment 3 is a proposed amendment to the Salary Plan for Part-Time Personnel which reflects the hourly rates from consolidating Part -Time job classifications. MANAGEMENT POSITIONS EXEMPT FROM COMPETITIVE SERVICE AMENDMENT: Communications Manager and Human Resources Manager will be designated as management and exempt from the City’s competitive service system. In order to identify these positions as management and exempt, a separate Resolution must be adopted that establishes the benefits for such management positions. The Resolution amending the management positions exempt from competitive service (Attachment 4) designates these two positions as exempt and defines specific management level benefits. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Amending the Classification Plan 2. Exhibit A to Resolution Amending the Classification Plan 3. Exhibit B to Resolution Amending the Classification Plan 4. Exhibit C to Resolution Amending the Classification Plan 5. Exhibit D to Resolution Amending the Classification Plan 6. Exhibit E to Resolution Amending the Classification Plan 7. Exhibit F to Resolution Amending the Classification Plan 8. Exhibit G to Resolution Amending the Classification Plan 9. Resolution Amending the Salary Plan for Management Positions Exempt form Competitive Service 10. Resolution Amending the Salary Plan for Part-Time Personnel 11. Resolution Amending the Management Positions Exempt from Competitive Service Resolution and Prescribing Leave Benefits for the Designated Positions 4.5 Packet Pg. 341 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Personnel System Rules, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 30-84 and subsequent resolutions which comprise the Classification Plan; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to periodically add and revise job descriptions in the Classification Plan to reflect current responsibilities and laws. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 30-84 and subsequent Resolutions shall be amended to add the following positions: Communications Manager (Exhibit A) Human Resources Manager (Exhibit B) Recreation Aide (Exhibit C) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 30-84 and subsequent Resolutions shall further include changes to the following amended positions: Customer Service Assistant (Exhibit D) Lifeguard/Swim Instructor (Exhibit E) Program Specialist (Exhibit F) Recreation Leader (Exhibit G) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 30-84 and subsequent Resolutions shall be amended to delete the following positions: Aquatics Program Specialist Assistant Pool Manager Assistant Swim Lesson Manager Cashier Customer Service Assistant I Customer Service Assistant II Facility Attendant I Facility Attendant II Lead Preschool Teacher Lifeguard I Lifeguard II Lifeguard/Swim Instructor I Lifeguard/Swim Instructor II Pool Manager Preschool Aide Preschool Teacher Recreation Driver Recreation Leader I Recreation Leader II Senior Facility Attendant Senior Recreation Leader Sports Official Swim Instructor I Swim Instructor II 4.5.a Packet Pg. 342 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) ATTACHMENT 1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this document shall become a part of the official Classification Plan for the City of Dublin; and that the changes contained herein shall be effective February 18, 2020. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ City Clerk 4.5.a Packet Pg. 343 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) Exhibit A 1 Date Adopted: 2/18/2020 Date Revised: Title: Communications Manager FLSA: Exempt/At-Will/Designated Management General Purpose: To plan, organize, and manage the activities of the Public Information Division within the City Manager’s Office. Directs the creation, development, production and distribution of public information and government affairs materials using all forms of communication and media. Demonstrates a full understanding of all applicable policies, procedures, laws and work methods associated with assigned duties. Act as the City’s representative to internal and external groups and advisory bodies related to areas of responsibility. Serve as public information officer during emergency operations. Provides highly complex staff assistance to the City Manager or designee. Distinguishing Characteristics: This is a single classification reporting directly to the City Manager or designee. The Communications Manager is responsible for the Public Information Division within the City Manager’s Office. The Communications Manager performs complex and politically sensitive tasks including functioning as the City’s media advisor and strategist. Appropriate judgment is essential to this position, as this position is expected to use professional judgement and skills in establishing relationships working with community and neighborhood groups. Strategic thinking is also essential to this position, including the ability to see emerging trends and develop strategies to succeed in a changing environment. Community sensitivity and awareness are crucial to this position, including gauging community reaction to City communications and programs and being able to effectively communicate to a very culturally diverse community. Creativity is paramount in developing and implementing effective marketing, public information, and media relations programs, campaigns, and materials using all available media, including social media. This position serves as the City’s coordinator of public information and media spokesperson by performing highly complex professional level work by developing, implementing, maintaining and evaluating the City’s information, education and public relations/marketing programs. Employees at this level receive administrative direction from the City Manager, or designee, in terms of goals and are reviewed in terms of results. A person appointed to the Communications Manager classification is an At-Will Employee. Supervision Received and Exercised: Receives administrative direction from the City Manager or designee. Exercises direct or indirect supervision over supervisory, professional, technical and clerical personnel as appropriate. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: The following duties are normal for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to this class. 4.5.b Packet Pg. 344 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . E x h i b i t A t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) Exhibit A 2 Develop and implement divisional goals, objectives, policies and procedures. Direct, oversee and participate in the development of the Division work plan; assign work activities, projects and programs; monitor workflow; review and evaluate work products, methods and procedures. Prepare the Division budget; assist in budget implementation; participate in the forecast of additional funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials and supplies; administer the approved budget. Develop and conduct public relations surveys through various methods. Represent the Division and City Manager’s Office to outside agencies and organizations; participate in outside community and professional groups and committees; provide technical assistance as necessary. Advise City Manager, City Council and Management staff on effective public information methods and procedures; develop training programs for staff on effective media relations. Coordinate public information program with all City Departments. Create, coordinate and/or contribute to a variety of written publications such as the City Newsletter, Department brochures, fact sheets and other publications. Assist Departments with the material content associated with the City’s website. Prepare media releases covering City programs and projects, governmental activities and matters of general interest to the community. Write, coordinate and/or contribute articles and develop other methods for the City to receive regional, State and national recognition for local programs and services. Establish schedules and methods for community and public relations; develop and implement public relations and social media policies and procedures. Design and implement marketing campaigns to promote City services, activities, programs and special events. Work directly with members of the local media as the media liaison on specific issues, when appropriate, and deliver communications designed to control local issues identified in the media/community relations program. Organize special events relating to areas of responsibility. Research and prepare technical and administrative reports; prepare written correspondence. Represent the City in a variety of community outreach activities and public education programs including participating as a contributing member of designated community organizations, committees/project teams and work groups. Prepare speeches and live and/or recorded presentations for the Mayor and City Council. Serve as public information officer during emergency operations. 4.5.b Packet Pg. 345 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . E x h i b i t A t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) Exhibit A 3 May recommend the appointment of personnel; provide or coordinate staff training; conduct performance evaluations; implement discipline procedures as required; maintain discipline and high standards necessary for the efficient and professional operation of the Public Information Division. Establish positive working relationships with representatives of community organizations, State/local agencies and associations, City management, City staff, news media, and the public. Attend conferences/trainings to remain current on professional issues and related legislation. Perform other related duties as required. Minimum Qualifications: Knowledge of: Principles of effective community relations in the municipal governance realm. Principals, practices and techniques for design and implementation of public affairs, public information and community programs. Practices and techniques used in disseminating information to the public through various media channels. Methods and techniques for creating effective media and public relations materials. Modern communication and marketing concepts, techniques and procedures. Production techniques for various print and electronic media. Operations and functioning of local media such as newspapers, radio and television. English language mechanics, syntax, grammar and spelling. Applicable Federal, State and local laws, rules and regulations. Principles and practices of leadership, motivation, team building and conflict resolution. Principles and practices of supervision, training and personnel management. Budgeting procedures and techniques. Modern office practices, procedures, methods and equipment. Customer service skills. Ability To: Organize and manage the operations of the Public Information Division. Interpret and apply City policies, procedures, rules and regulations as related to public information activities. Coordinate the dissemination of information concerning City services and events on a routine basis. 4.5.b Packet Pg. 346 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . E x h i b i t A t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) Exhibit A 4 Use all relevant forms of social media (including the City website, FaceBook, Twitter, etc.) to keep all segments of the community informed of important municipal issues and information; monitor and manage comments and postings on social media to minimize inaccuracies damaging to the City. Develop and maintain effective working relationships with local, regional, national and online media entities to maximize access on behalf of the City. Develop and distribute up-to-date information to the local business community using social media outlets, general media contacts and the City website. Communicate politically, culturally, and socially sensitive issues persuasively and tactfully; communicate effectively, clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing. Use interpersonal skills to initiate, establish and maintain effective working relationships with elected officials, neighborhood and community groups, business leaders; Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work; Gain cooperation through discussion and persuasion. Prepare written material regarding local government activities and programs. Maintain effective working relationships with the media. Coordinate the public information program with other City Departments to present a clear and concise description of activities, programs and events. Train, educate and advise City Staff and Elected Officials in effective ways to make public presentations and develop and implement constructive media relations. Handle pressure of deadlines and work on several projects or processes at the same time. Write with sufficient clarity to produce clear, concise and readable copy on a wide variety of topics. Effectively use a personal computer to produce a wide variety of written and graphic material and information for external and internal distribution. Prepare and administer a budget. Supervise, train and evaluate personnel, as appropriate. Work a flexible schedule including evening and weekend hours. Physical Standards: The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfully perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. An employee is regularly required to sit for long periods of time; intermittently stand, walk, bend, and twist to reach equipment around desk; perform simple grasping and fine manipulation; use telephone, hand writing and use of keyboard to communicate; see small text and numbers; intermittently move equipment weighing 20 pounds or less. 4.5.b Packet Pg. 347 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . E x h i b i t A t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) Exhibit A 5 Use written and oral communications skills; read and interpret complex data, information and documents; analyze and solve problems; observe and interpret people and situations; learn and apply new information or skills; perform highly detailed work on multiple, concurrent tasks with constant interruptions; work under intensive and constantly changing deadlines and interact with those encountered in the course of work. Education, Experience, and Training: Any combination of education and experience equivalent to the following is likely to provide the required knowledge and abilities. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: Education: Equivalent to a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university with major course work in business or public administration, public relations, mass communications, English, journalism, or a closely related field. A Master’s degree is desirable. Experience: Four years of progressive responsible professional level work in public relations or public information products and programs. Experience working with all relevant media, including social media. Two years of administrative and/or lead supervisory experience required. Experience working with City officials is highly desirable. Training: Any recent training, such as academic courses and certification programs, which are relevant to this job classification. Licenses, Certificates, Special Requirements: Possession of a valid California Class C Drivers’ License and Certificate of Automobile Insurance for Personal Liability. Special Requirements: Must have the willingness and ability to: work the hours necessary to accomplish the assigned duties, including evening and week-end hours; attend evening meetings; travel out of town and attend workshops, conferences, seminars during work and non-work hours. 4.5.b Packet Pg. 348 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . E x h i b i t A t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT B 1 Date Adopted: 2/18/2020 Date Revised: Title: Human Resources Manager FLSA: Exempt/At-Will/Designated Management General Purpose: The Human Resources Manager under the administrative direction of the City Manager or his/her designee is responsible for the management, supervision and operation of the Human Resources Division of the City Manager’s Office; provides high-level management of departmental division and related ancillary human resources programs; performs administrative and managerial work related to carrying out City and division goals, objectives, and priorities; and performs related work as required. Under general direction, plans, organizes, directs, and supervises the Human Resources Division; directs and participates in the administration, development and analysis of human resources programs, policies and procedures in support of the City's employee and labor relations, benefits administration, recruitment and selection, classification and compensation, training, and workers' compensation; participates as a member of the Department's management team and on City-wide teams; provides highly responsible and complex administrative support; and performs other duties as assigned. Distinguishing Characteristics: The Human Resources Manager is a management position in a single job classification providing highly responsible and complex staff assistance to the City Manager or his/her designee. Employees in this classification have a broad range of independence within policy and procedural limitations and work under minimal supervision. While the general parameters of the job are defined, the employee is expected to select and put into effect work procedures and practices which will lead to the effective and efficient accomplishment of division goals and objectives. Persons appointed to this classification are considered At -Will employees serving at the pleasure of the City Manager. As designated by the City Manager, this position may serve as the City’s Personnel Officer. The Human Resources Manager has considerable latitude in the management of human resources programs and staff, within the general guidelines and professional and administrative standards. This classification is distinguished from the Management Analyst series (Confidential) in that the Human Resources Manager is the division manager with overall responsibility for the Human Resources. It is further distinguished from the Human Resources Director in that the Director has overall responsibility for the Human Resources, Risk Management and Safety Divisions. 4.5.c Packet Pg. 349 At t a c h m e n t : 3 . E x h i b i t B t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT B 2 Supervision Received and Exercised: Receives administrative direction from the City Manager or his/her designee. Exercises direct and indirect supervision to professional, technical, administrative, and temporary staff. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: The following duties are normal for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to this class. Direct Division activities such as personnel merit system administration, recruitment, testing and selection, classification and compensation, employee relations, employee benefits, workers’ compensation administration, Injury and Illness Prevention Plan (IIPP) and maintenance of centralized personnel file and records. Plan and direct all activities necessary to provide Human Resources management services to City Departments. Develop and make recommendations to the City Manager and operating departments on creating, revising, or abolishing various rules, policies and procedures relating to personnel matters. Advise executive and management staff regarding sound Human Resources practices and encourage the use and application of such practices and techniques in resolving operating problems. Administer the City’s position classification, salary plan, and benefit systems. Manage the development and implementation of the Human Resources Division goals, objectives, policies and priorities in accordance with City policy. Counsel and advise the City Manager, Department Heads, employee representatives, and others on employee relations matters. Investigate staffing problems and provide guidance for problem solving and disciplinary action. Direct the preparation and administration of the department’s work program. Direct the preparation and presentation of the department’s budget; monitor expenditures and compliance. Coordinate and direct the City’s labor relations process with City employees. Administer employee disciplinary, grievance and complaint procedures. 4.5.c Packet Pg. 350 At t a c h m e n t : 3 . E x h i b i t B t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT B 3 Manage the activities and review the work of subordinate personnel engaged in employee development, employment, recruitment and examination, classification, compensation, benefits administration, and employee relations. Monitor compliance with federal, state and local equal employment opportunity laws and regulations. Implement any necessary revisions and amendment to ordinances and resolution relating to personnel matters. Develop and direct new employee orientation, employee development, and employee training and recognition programs. Attend conferences/trainings to remain current on professional issues and related legislation. Perform required duties under the City’s disaster response plan. Prepare correspondence to other human resource agencies, regulatory agencies, represented groups, etc. Assist the City Manager, as a member of the City’s executive m anagement team, in the overall administrative and policy planning process of the City. Participate in Human Resources-related activities with local, regional, and statewide organizations and confer with outside agencies and organizations on a wide variety of personnel management matters. Perform other related duties as assigned. Minimum Qualifications: Knowledge of: Modern and highly complex principles and practices of human resources program and administration. Concepts and elements of employee benefit and workers’ compensation administration and programming including necessary liaison with claims administrators, brokers and insurance companies. Organizational and management practices as applied to the analysis and evaluation of programs, policies, and operational needs. Pertinent Federal, State and local laws, regulations, codes, ordinances, and policies applicable to human resources management. Statistical concepts and methods, research organization, problem solving techniques, budget processes, management and resource allocation. 4.5.c Packet Pg. 351 At t a c h m e n t : 3 . E x h i b i t B t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT B 4 Principles and practices of leadership, motivation, mentoring, team building, and conflict resolution. Supervision and performance appraisal techniques and systems. Effective public speaking. Pertinent computer and other equipment use and related software/program applications. Ability To: Organize and manage the City’s Human Resources Division of the City Manager’s Office. Become knowledgeable of the City's policies and procedures, such as the Personnel Rules and Regulations, Administrative Regulations, and other policies and procedures, and apply them to resolve problems and/or answer questions from employees and managers. Use a computer and common software in the performance of job responsibilities. Effectively formulate and administer sound Human Resources departmental policies and procedures for City. Set work standards and priorities for staff; effectively use staff in a proactive way; conduct periodic performance reviews, mentor, coach and provide clear and concise direction to staff; recommend corrective action when necessary. Exercise considerable judgment, resourcefulness, leadership and tact in dealing with City employees, Councilmembers, organizations, agencies and the general public. Handle sensitive Human Resources matters including disciplinary issues, reclassification, employee problems, employee relation issues and grievances. Analyze and make sound recommendations for resolving controversial inter and intra-departmental personnel problems. Properly interpret and make decisions in conformance with pertinent Federal, State and local laws and regulations governing personnel practices and in accordance with City rules and policies. Use a computer and common human resource software platforms in the performance of job responsibilities. Physical Standards: The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfully perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. 4.5.c Packet Pg. 352 At t a c h m e n t : 3 . E x h i b i t B t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT B 5 An employee is regularly required to sit for long periods of time; talk or hear, in person, in meetings and by telephone; use hands and fingers to handle, feel or operate standard office equipment; and reach with hands and arms. The employee is frequently required to, bend and twist to reach files, walk and stand and occasionally lift up to 30 pounds. While performing duties, the employee is regularly required to use written and oral communication skills; converse in person, and to large groups and be clearly understood. Read and interpret complex data, information and documents; analyze and solve problems; interact with City management, other governmental officials, contractors, vendors, employees and the public. Training and Experience: Any combination equivalent to education and experience is likely to provide the required knowledge and abilities. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: Education: Bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university in human resource management, business administration or a closely related field. Master’s degree is highly desired. Experience: Four years of progressively responsible, professional human resources work including two years of supervisory experience. Experience in a public sector agency is highly desirable. Licenses; Certificates; Special Requirements: Any recent training such as academic courses and certification programs which are relevant to this job classification. International Public Management Association for Human Resources Certification Senior Certified Professional (IPMA-SCP) highly desirable. Must be willing to work such hours as are necessary to accomplish the job requirements; travel to attend meetings, seminars and conferences. This classification is designated as a Mandatory Reporter; Completion of Mandatory Reporter training is required within one month of employment. Classification requires the possession and continued maintenance of a valid class “C” California driver’s license for operating a motor vehicle and Certificate of Automobile Insurance for Personal Liability. 4.5.c Packet Pg. 353 At t a c h m e n t : 3 . E x h i b i t B t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT C 1 Date Adopted: February 18, 2020 Date Revised: Title: Recreation Aide FLSA: Non-Exempt, Part-Time/Temporary-Seasonal/At-Will General Purpose: Under general supervision, assist in the proper use of a community recreational facility and assist Recreation Leaders in providing a variety of recreation programs related to preschool, playground, after school programs, parks, teens, sports, special events, and senior citizen activities. Supervision Received and Exercised: Receive general supervision from a Recreation Coordinator and may receive technical and/or functional supervision from a Recreation Leader or Program Specialist. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: The following duties are normal for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to this class. Assist in leading recreation activities in program areas such as preschool, playground, parks, teens, sports, special events, and senior citizen activities. Assist in carrying out recreational activities appropriate to a variety of locations such as playgrounds, parks, community centers, pre-school classrooms, school sites, and sports facilities. Assist in leading activities in areas such as arts and crafts, games, sports, music, drama, and nature study. Assist in setting up, taking down, and cleaning up recreational facilities, as assigned; open and close facilities as scheduled for use, secure the facility upon leaving. May provide minor first aid to recreation program participants and/or perform related first aid/emergency techniques. EXHIBIT C 2 Exercise precautions necessary to ensure the safety of recreation program participants and spectators. Build and maintain positive working relationships with co-workers, other City employees and the public using principles of good customer service. Set up furniture or equipment for activities scheduled and see that it is in proper condition and is replaced after use. Monitor activities of facility users for appropriate and safe conduct. Clean up after facility users and set up for subsequent activities; sweep and mop floors as required, empty trash receptacles throughout the facility as necessary; keep restrooms and kitchen clean and well stocked with paper towels, tissues, etc. Collect fees from public swimming pool patrons and aquatics class registrants, and issue pool passes. Complete daily attendance and cash receipt report forms. Answer the telephone, provide information to callers and write messages, as needed. Assist customers at the front counter. Perform general clerical work such as issuing receipts, photocopying, and filing; complete and submit required forms and reports. Clean and sanitize workstation and equipment. Assist in conducting preschool class activities in areas such as arts and crafts, games, music, or story time. Interpret and apply official game rules for a variety of sports related to league play. Conduct sports contests according to rules of the game and maintain control of the contest. Oversee the work of scoring officials to ensure proper timing and scoring of the event; perform as official scorer-of-record. Inspect playing field area and equipment prior to play to ensure preparation and safety for play to begin. Ensure safety of players and spectators. Notify appropriate City staff regarding necessary repair and/or replacement of play areas/related equipment. EXHIBIT C 3 Perform other duties as assigned. Minimum Qualifications: Knowledge of: Basic knowledge of a variety of recreation activities. Rules, regulations, procedures, and score keeping as applied to the conduct of a variety of field sport league activities. Age group characteristics of preschool children Basic arithmetic, including addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. English language skills, including punctuation and spelling; Point of sale or cash registers. Ability to: Learn skills needed to conduct basic recreation activities. Follow written and oral instructions. Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing. Perform heavy physical work including the lifting and moving of tables and chairs. Deal with difficult or stressful situations in a calm and professional manner. Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Officiate at a variety of field sport league activities; engage in physical activity. Exercise objective judgment in making field sport rules determinations/calls. Exercise courtesy and tact in dealing with recreation program participants, spectators, players, and sports and team officials. Must be available to work nights, weekends and holidays. Use of a personal computer is desirable. EXHIBIT C 4 Physical Standards: The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfully perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. On a continuous basis, know and understand all aspects of the job; intermittently analyze work papers, reports and special projects; identify and interpret technical and numerical information; observe and report operational and technical policy and procedures. On an intermittent basis, sit at desk for long periods of time; stand, walk, and bend while assisting with recreation activities; squat, climb, kneel and twist when setting up various recreation programs; talk or hear, in person, in meetings and by telephone; use hands and fingers to handle, feel or operate standard office equipment; reach with hands and arms; perform simple grasping and fine manipulation; and lift or carry weight of 100 pounds or less. While performing duties, the employee is regularly required to use written and oral communication skills; interact with City staff, volunteers, vendors, and the public. Training and Experience: Any combination equivalent to education and experience likely to provide the required knowledge and abilities are qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: Education: There is no educational requirement for this class; equivalent to completion of two years of high school is desirable. Experience: Work experience is not required; experience in handling money and cashiering is desirable. Demonstrated experience (paid or volunteer) working with preschool age children in a structured or supervised social/recreational program is desirable. Licenses; Certificates; Special Requirements: At time of hire, must be 15 years of age or older (18 years of age if assigned to Preschool Program). Work Permit, as applicable. Any offer of employment to an adult who will have direct contact with minors is conditional upon submission of completed fingerprint screening and a satisfactory background check. Current certification in First Aid and CPR is required within one month of employment Possession of a valid California Class C driver’s license is not required for this class; however, if an employee possesses a valid license, he/she may be required to provide a Certificate of Automotive Insurance for Personal Liability. EXHIBIT C 5 This classification is designated as a Mandatory Reporter; Completion of Mandatory Reporter training is required within one month of employment. EXHIBIT D 1 Date Adopted: February 18, 2020 Date Revised: Title: Customer Service Assistant FLSA: Non-Exempt, Part-Time/Temporary-Seasonal/At-Will General Purpose: To perform a wide variety of customer service, cashier, and clerical duties related to the function, facility, and department assigned. The location and hours of this part-time position are flexible and vary based on the needs of the assigned department. Supervision Received and Exercised: Receives immediate supervision from assigned supervisor and functional and/or technical supervision from higher-level clerical and/or technical personnel. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: The following duties are normal for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to this class. Perform general clerical duties related to assigned functional area, facility, and department. Type, proofread, and process a variety of documents including general correspondence, customer- related correspondence, and memos, from rough draft or verbal instruction. Assist customers at the front counter; act as a receptionist; answer the telephone and wait on the general public. Provide information on department and programs areas and policies and procedures; refer inquiries as appropriate. Receive facility rental applications for public facilities and registration forms for City programs; check availability. Process transactions and collect fees from the public for registrations, facility rentals, and other 4.5.e Packet Pg. 359 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . E x h i b i t D t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT D 2 program areas. Balance cash register and prepare reconciliation form. Perform a wide variety of routine clerical work including filing, tallying, checking and recording information on records. Sort and file documents and records, maintaining alphabetical, index, and cross-reference files. Operate standard office equipment including computer, printer, copier, and facsimile machine. Receive, sort and distribute incoming and outgoing mail; send facsimile requests. Build and maintain positive working relationships with co-workers, other City employees, and the public using principles of good customer service. Perform related duties as assigned. Minimum Qualifica tions : Knowledge of: English usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Word processing and spreadsheet software. Personal computer and ten-key adding machine. Office methods and equipment including filing systems. Cash handling and cashiering procedures. Organization, procedures and operating details of the City department to which assigned. Laws, rules and regulations related to area of assignment. Techniques in managing difficult or stressful situations. Ability to: Learn the organization, procedures and operating details of the City department to which assigned. Learn department processes and procedures, rules, and regulations related to area of assignment. Perform routine clerical work including maintenance of appropriate records 4.5.e Packet Pg. 360 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . E x h i b i t D t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT D 3 Verify and check files and data. Understand and carry out both oral and written directions Perform simple mathematical calculations. Communicate in an effective manner. Exercise courtesy and tact in meeting or talking with the public. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Operate a variety of work-related office equipment. Must be available to work nights, weekends and holidays. Independently perform duties in assigned area. Type accurately at a speed of 35 words per minute. Training and Experience: Any combination of experience and training that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: Education: Equivalent to the completion of the twelfth grade. Experience: Some clerical experience is desirable. Physical Standards: The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfully perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. An employee is regularly required to: sit at desk for long periods of time; talk or hear, in person, at the public counter and by telephone; use hands and fingers to handle, feel or operate standard office equipment; and reach with hands and arms. Intermittently, twist to reach equipment surrounding desk; walk to observe department activities; bend and squat to perform file searches; perform simple grasping and fine manipulation; use telephone and write or use a keyboard to communicate through written means. While performing duties, the employee is regularly required to use written and oral communication skills; explain policies and procedures to vendors, employees and the general public. 4.5.e Packet Pg. 361 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . E x h i b i t D t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT D 4 Licenses; Certificates; Special Requirements: Valid typing certificate. Must be available to work nights, weekends and holidays. Any offer of employment to an adult who will have direct contact with minors is conditional upon submission of completed fingerprint screening and a satisfactory background check. Certification in Standard First Aid and CPR is desirable. Possession of a valid California Class C drivers' license and Certificate of Automobile Insurance for Personal Liability. This classification is designated as a Mandatory Reporter; Completion of Mandatory Reporter training is required within one month of employment. 4.5.e Packet Pg. 362 At t a c h m e n t : 5 . E x h i b i t D t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT E 1 Date Adopted: February 18, 2020 Date Revised: Title: Lifeguard/Swim Instructor FLSA: Non-Exempt, Part-Time/Temporary-Seasonal/At-Will General Purpose: To perform lifeguard duties in enforcing City public swimming pool rules and monitoring pool patron conduct; perform emergency rescue and lifesaving techniques. To provide instruction in all levels of American Red Cross swimming certification and other aquatics programs. Supervision Received and Exercised: Receives immediate supervision from assigned supervisor and functional and/or technical supervision from higher-level technical personnel including Recreation Coordinator. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: The following duties are normal for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to this class. Enforce swimming pool rules and regulations, including ensuring orderly conduct of swim team and pool patrons. Assist in providing instruction and coaching for a variety of swimming classes and activities for all ages and ability levels. Assist swimmers who are in distress and administer a variety of first aid and/or life saving techniques, as appropriate. Assist in maintaining pool areas in a safe and clean condition. Build and maintain positive working relationships with co-workers, other City employees and the public using principles of good customer service. Develop and implement lesson plans for swimming classes. Maintain accurate records related to swimming classes. 4.5.f Packet Pg. 363 At t a c h m e n t : 6 . E x h i b i t E t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT E 2 Perform other duties as assigned. Minimum Qualifications: Knowledge of: Basic instruction/training techniques. Proficient use of lifesaving techniques and equipment used at public swimming pools. Ability to: Develop and implement lesson plans for swimming instruction and certification activities. Instruct and train patrons in a variety of swimming skills and techniques. Learn and enforce City swimming pool rules, regulations, and policies. Perform lifesaving strokes according to American Red Cross standards, perform lifesaving and emergency first aid techniques and practices; engage in physical activity. Follow written and oral instructions. Communicate in an effective manner. Exercise courtesy and tact in dealing with pool patrons. Deal with difficult or stressful situations in a calm and professional manner. Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Physical Standards: The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfully perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. On a continuous basis, know and understand all aspects of the job; intermittently analyze work papers, reports and instructions, observe, identify, and report operational problems. On an intermittent basis, sit in lifeguard station for long periods of time; stand, walk, and bend while monitoring various swimming activities; squat, climb, kneel and twist intermittently when setting up various programs; perform various swimming techniques; perform simple grasping and fine manipulation; and lift or carry weight of 100 pounds or less. 4.5.f Packet Pg. 364 At t a c h m e n t : 6 . E x h i b i t E t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT E 3 Training and Experience: Any combination equivalent to education and experience likely to provide the required knowledge and abilities are qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: Education: There is no educational requirement for this class; equivalent to completion of two years of high school is desirable. Experience: Demonstrated experience in skilled aquatic activities is desirable. Licenses; Certificates; Special Requirements: At time of hire, must be 15 years of age or older. Work permit, as applicable. Any offer of employment to an adult who will have direct contact with minors is conditional upon submission of a completed fingerprint screening and a satisfactory background check. Current certification in American Red Cross CPR or the Professional Rescuer with AED; Lifeguard Training with Administering Emergency Oxygen; First Aid for Public Safety Personnel (California Title 22) within one year of employment; Water Safety Instructor (WSI) is desirable. Possession of a valid California Class C driver’s license is not required for this class; however, if an employee possesses a valid license, he/she may be required to provide a Certificate of Automotive Insurance for Personal Liability. This classification is designated as a Mandatory Reporter; Completion of Mandated Reporter training is required within one month of employment. 4.5.f Packet Pg. 365 At t a c h m e n t : 6 . E x h i b i t E t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT F 1 Date Adopted: December 16, 2014 Date Revised: February 18, 2020 Title: Program Specialist FLSA: Non-Exempt, Part-Time/Temporary-Seasonal/At-Will General Purpose: The purpose of the Program Specialist classification is to assist in the development, organization, and operations of programs and projects within the City. Distinguishing Characteristics: Employees assigned to this classification are responsible for performing a broad range of tasks that support planning, coordinating and implementing programs within an assigned area. The individual is expected to perform routine and difficult staff work and take specific responsibility for the assigned programs. Supervision Received/Exercised: Receives direction from full-time personnel. As appropriate, may exercise technical and functional supervision over part-time recreation staff and volunteers Essential Duties and Responsibilities: The following duties are normal for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to this class. Under supervision, assist with planning, coordinating and implementing programs and projects within an assigned area. Aid in the analysis, implementation and monitoring of City programs. Assist in the development of new program elements and program modifications as necessary to meet stated goals and objectives. Conduct surveys and perform routine research and statistical analyses as requested; prepare related reports. 4.5.g Packet Pg. 366 At t a c h m e n t : 7 . E x h i b i t F t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT F 2 Compile materials and assist in the preparation of reports, manuals, publications and miscellaneous public information literature. Oversee part-time recreation staff as assigned and review the activities of volunteers. Assist with administrative tasks including the maintenance of records, files and other data. Participate in assessing supplies needed for programs and requisition additional supplies as needed. Assist in ensuring that City activities start and finish in the prescribed manner and time frames. Build and maintain positive working relationships with co-workers, other City employees and the public using principles of good customer service. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to this class. Minimum Qualifications: Knowledge of: Techniques and methods related to the coordination of the assigned program or project. Basic budgeting techniques. Pertinent local, State and Federal laws, ordinances and rules. English language usage, spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Principles and practices of record keeping. Principles and practices of standard safety precautions. Methods of program planning and evaluation. Operational characteristics of the assigned Parks and Community Services program or project. Customer service techniques. Ability To: Assist with planning, coordinating and implementing programs and projects. Communicate in an effective manner, both orally and in writing. 4.5.g Packet Pg. 367 At t a c h m e n t : 7 . E x h i b i t F t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT F 3 Use a personal computer, including word processing, spreadsheet, database, and desktop publishing applications. Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Attend day, evening, and weekend meetings and events. Problem-solve conflicts and disputes. Analyze, interpret and explain program policies and procedures. Prepare written reports, newsletters, flyers and other written materials. Exercise good judgment, tact and courtesy. Physical Standards: The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfully perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. On a continuous basis, know and understand all aspects of the job; intermittently analyze work papers, reports and special projects; identify and interpret technical and numerical information; observe and report operational and technical policy and procedures. On an intermittent basis, sit at desk for long periods of time, stand, walk, and bend while conducting/reviewing programs; squat, climb, kneel and twist intermittently when setting up various programs; frequently interact with children (depending on program area); perform simple grasping and fine manipulation; and lift or carry weight of 100 pounds or less. While performing duties, the employee is regularly required to use written and oral communication skills; read and interpret information; resolve customer services issues; interact with City staff, volunteers, vendors, and the public. Training and Experience: Any combination equivalent to education and experience is likely to provide the required knowledge and abilities. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: Education: Completion of twelfth grade and some college course work in the area relevant to the assigned program area. Completion of Associates Arts or Science degree (A.A/A.S.) is desirable. If assigned to Preschool Program, college course work must include specialization in early childhood education. 4.5.g Packet Pg. 368 At t a c h m e n t : 7 . E x h i b i t F t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT F 4 Experience: Two years of progressively responsible paid experience in programming and project areas representative of the assigned program area. If assigned to Preschool Program, experience must include one-year of supervising staff. Licenses; Certificates; Special Requirements: At time of hire, must be 18 years of age or older Any offer of employment to an adult who will have direct contact with minors is conditional upon submission of a completed fingerprint screening and a satisfactory background check. Possession of a valid California Class C Driver’s License and a Certificate of Automotive Insurance for Personal Liability. This classification is designated as a Mandatory Reporter; Completion of Mandated Reporter training is required within one month of employment. Possession of current certificate, credential or license in the area of specialty program (as appropriate). If assigned to: Aquatics: Current certification in Safety Training for Swim Coaches; Water Safety Instructor; American Red Cross CPR for the Professional Rescuer with AED; Lifeguard Training with Administering Emergency Oxygen; First Aid for Public Safety Personnel (California Title 22) within one year of employment. Lifeguard Management certification desirable. Preschool: Possession of valid Red Cross CPR and First Aid Certification. 4.5.g Packet Pg. 369 At t a c h m e n t : 7 . E x h i b i t F t o R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e C l a s s i f i c a t i o n P l a n ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) EXHIBIT G 1 Date Adopted: February 18, 2020 Date Revised: Title: Recreation Leader FLSA: Non-Exempt, Part-Time/Temporary-Seasonal/At-Will General Purpose: Under general supervision, lead and conduct activities in the delivery of recreation program areas including preschool, playground, after school programs, parks, teens, sports, special events, and senior citizen; oversee the proper use of a community recreational facility; perform a variety of custodial tasks; assist the public and staff in their use of the facility. Distinguishing Characteristics: The Recreation Leader classification is distinguished from the Recreation Aide level in the complexity of duties assigned, independence of action taken, the amount of time spent performing the duties, the nature of the public contact made, and its training responsibilities of new staff. Positions at this level are required to be fully trained in all procedures related to assigned area of responsibility. Supervision Received and Exercised: Receive general supervision from a Recreation Coordinator. May receive technical and/or functional supervision from a Program Specialist. Exercise technical and functional supervision over Recreation Aide. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: The following duties are normal for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to this class. Plan, oversee, and conduct recreational activities in program areas such as preschool, playground, parks, after school programming, teens, sports, museum, special events, and senior citizen activities. EXHIBIT G 2 Conduct activities in areas such as arts and crafts, games, sports, music, drama, and nature study. Instruct participants in the rules and methods of playing indoor and outdoor games. Inspect activity areas and related equipment, make written reports of damage to equipment or facility and recommend maintenance and repair, as appropriate. Enforce safety rules and regulations; maintain orderly participant conduct. Provide minor first aid to recreation program participants/spectators and/or perform related first aid/emergency techniques. Exercise precautions necessary to ensure the safety of recreation program participants and spectators. Build and maintain positive working relationships with co-workers, other City employees and the public using principles of good customer service. Open and close facilities as scheduled for use; clean up after facility users and set up for subsequent activities; secure the facility upon leaving. Set up furniture or equipment for activities scheduled and see that it is in proper condition and is replaced after use. Sweep and mop floors as required; keep restrooms and kitchen clean and well stocked with paper towels, tissues, etc.; empty trash receptacles throughout the facility as necessary. Responsible for monitoring adherence to building rules and party limitations. Maintain records and complete written program plans and reports. When work assignments are in public area of assigned facility, greet visitors, collect fees, have visitors sign guest book. Provide facility and exhibit orientations and/or tours including appropriate tour materials. Develop weekly lesson plans; plan and direct lessons, games, crafts and songs for after school and pre-school programs. Function as supervising attendant for evening rentals and weekday evening shifts, as necessary. Monitor patrons, patrol parks and enforce rules to ensure that permit areas are safe, clean, and functional; notify Dublin Police Services as deemed necessary. EXHIBIT G 3 Observe park conditions to ensure that permit areas, including picnic areas and fields are within appropriate standards. Post City information as required and remove outdated and or unauthorized notices. Confirm reservations for specific permitted areas; resolve conflicts when appropriate. Provide advice and information on park and recreation regulations to the public when requested and/or as needed; prepare incident reports and related documentation as needed. Train and oversee activities of part-time staff, as assigned. Ensure that activities operate in accordance with general department philosophy, objectives and guidelines. Perform related duties as assigned. Knowledge of: English usage and vocabulary. Operational characteristics of the assigned programs. Principles and practices of facility maintenance and operational practices. Principles and practices of standard safety precautions. Customer service techniques. Techniques of instruction for conducting recreation programs in preschool, playground, parks, after school programming, teens, sports, museum, special events, and senior citizen activities. Ability to: Conduct recreation activities; lead recreational activities such as games, arts & crafts, music and drama. Develop and implement effective program curriculum/content; plan and schedule activities. Organize people, supplies, equipment and facilities. Follow written and oral instructions. Express ideas and communicate effectively both verbally and in writing. EXHIBIT G 4 Exercise courtesy and tact in dealing with recreation program participants and spectators. Deal with difficult or stressful situations in a calm and professional manner. Problem solve conflicts and disputes as applicable. Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course of work. Work effectively with preschool, elementary and teenage children and parents. Learn tour and exhibit content; provide tours to diverse audiences. Analyze and interpret facility policies and procedures. Explain and enforce rules, regulations, procedures and program objectives. Do heavy physical work including the lifting and moving of tables and chairs; perform routine maintenance tasks. Administer basic First Aid/CPR. Train and oversee part-time staff. Must be available to work nights, weekends and holidays. Physical Standards: The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfully perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. On a continuous basis, know and understand all aspects of the job; intermittently analyze work papers, reports and special projects; identify and interpret technical and numerical information; observe and report operational and technical policy and procedures. An employee is regularly required to sit for long periods of time; talk or hear, in person, in meetings and by telephone; use hands and fingers to handle, feel or operate standard office equipment; and reach with hands and arms. The employee is frequently required to bend, twist, lift, walk; stand; and set-up and move equipment weighing up to 100 pounds. While performing duties, the employee is regularly required to use written and oral communication skills; read and interpret information and room layout specifications; and interact with City staff, volunteers, vendors, and the public. EXHIBIT G 5 Training and Experience: Any combination equivalent to education and experience likely to provide the required knowledge and abilities are qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be: Education: Equivalent to completion of three years of high school. Some college level course work in recreation, early childhood education, leisure services, or a related field are desirable. Experience: A minimum of one-year experience performing duties similar to that of a Recreation Aide. Licenses; Certificates; Special Requirements: At time of hire, must be 16 years of age or older (18 years or age if assigned to Preschool Program). Work Permit, as applicable. Any offer of employment to an adult who will have direct contact with minors is conditional upon submission of completed fingerprint screening and a satisfactory background check. Current certification in First Aid and CPR is required. Possession of a valid California Class C drivers’ license and a Certificate of Automotive Insurance for Personal Liability. This classification is designated as a Mandatory Reporter; Completion of Mandated Reporter training is required within one month of employment. ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * RESOLUTION AMENDING THE SALARY PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT POSITIONS EXEMPT FROM COMPETITIVE SERVICE WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Personnel System Rules, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 64-97 and subsequent Resolutions which establish a Salary Plan for full-time personnel; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 86-01 and subsequent Resolutions which establish a Salary Plan for management positions exempt from competitive service in accordance with the City’s Personnel System Rules. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the positions of Communications Manager and Human Resources Manager shall be added and covered under Article I, Section A of the Salary Plan for Full-Time Management Positions Exempt from Competitive Service; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following position shall be paid a monthly salary within the following salary range with the exclusion of any Performance Pay Adjustment granted in accordance with the adopted Personnel Rules: Communications Manager $ 10,800 - $ 13,501 Human Resources Manager $ 10,800 - $ 13,501 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this document shall become a part of the official Salary Plan for the City of Dublin; and that the changes contained herein shall be effective July 1, 2020. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ City Clerk 4.5.i Packet Pg. 375 At t a c h m e n t : 9 . R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e S a l a r y P l a n f o r M a n a g e m e n t P o s i t i o n s E x e m p t f o r m C o m p e t i t i v e S e r v i c e ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. XX-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * AMENDING THE SALARY PLAN FOR PART-TIME PERSONNEL WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Personnel System Rules, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 61-17 and subsequent resolutions which comprise the Salary Plan for Part-Time Personnel; and WHEREAS, competitive salary provisions which will attract and retain quality employees are important to the organization; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to update salary provisions for part-time employees in the City’s personnel system. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following salary ranges in accordance with the adopted Personnel Rules: Part-Time Classification Minimum Maximum Administrative Intern Minimum Wage $26.52 Customer Service Assistant Minimum Wage $28.52 Food Service Worker Minimum Wage $21.37 Head Lifeguard Minimum Wage $25.68 Lifeguard/Swim Instructor Minimum Wage $21.37 Program Specialist Minimum Wage $42.44 Recreation Aide Minimum Wage $17.85 Recreation Leader Minimum Wage $21.37 Slide Attendant Minimum Wage $14.85 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this document shall become a part of the official Salary Plan for the City of Dublin; an d that the changes contained herein shall be effective February 18, 2020. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 4.5.j Packet Pg. 376 At t a c h m e n t : 1 0 . R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e S a l a r y P l a n f o r P a r t - T i m e P e r s o n n e l ( R e v i s i o n s t o t h e P e r s o n n e l S y s t e m ) ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. XX- 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * AMENDING THE MANAGEMENT POSITIONS EXEMPT FROM COMPETITIVE SERVICE RESOLUTION AND PRESCRIBING LEAVE BENEFITS FOR THE DESIGNATED POSITIONS WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a Personnel Ordinance in which Section 2.20.040 E of the Ordinance exempts Department Heads and other Management Positions from Competitive Service; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Personnel Ordinance, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 202-08 which establishes Management Positions and defines benefits for those positions; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to periodically update the Resolution to reflect new classifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following positions shall be designated as a Management Position under the City’s Personnel Ordinance and shall be granted benefits in accordance with City Resolution 202-08: Communications Manager Human Resources Manager BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the changes contained herein shall be effective July 1, 2020. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2020. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ City Clerk 4.5.k Packet Pg. 377 At t a c h m e n t : 1 1 . R e s o l u t i o n A m e n d i n g t h e M a n a g e m e n t P o s i t i o n s E x e m p t f r o m C o m p e t i t i v e S e r v i c e R e s o l u t i o n a n d P r e s c r i b i n g L e a v e B e n e f i t s Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers Prepared by: Veronica Briggs, Senior Finance Technician EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from December 1, 2019 - January 31, 2020 totaling $10,890,854.91. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. FINANCIAL IMPACT: SUMMARY OF PAYMENTS ISSUED December 1, 2019 through January 31, 2020 Total Number of Payments: 461 Total Amount of Payments: $10,890,854.91 DESCRIPTION: The Payment Issuance Report (Attachment 1) provides a listing of all payments for the period beginning December 1, 2019 through J anuary 31, 2020. This report is provided in accordance with the policy adopted November 15, 2011 in Resolution No.189 -11. The listing of payments has been reviewed in accordance with the policies for processing payments and expenditures. The City’s practice of reporting payments to the City Council after the payments have been made is in compliance with California Government Code Sections 37208 (b) and (c), which allow for an agency to make payments without first being audited by the legislative body, as long as such payments are: 1) conforming to a budget approved by ordinance or resolution of the legislative body; and 2) presented to the legislative body for ratification and approval in the form of an audited comprehensive annual financial report. 4.6 Packet Pg. 378 Page 2 of 2 STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Payment Issuance Report for December 2019 - January 2020 4.6 Packet Pg. 379 Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 1 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 12/03/2019 DSRSD 11,485.15 SERVICE TO 10/31/2019 Payments Issued 12/3/2019 Total: 11,485.15 12/05/2019 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 400.00 AFTER SCHOOL REC SUPPLIES 958.27 BUSINESS ANNIVERSARY SUPPLIES 650.86 CA PARK & REC SOCIETY DUES & CONF REG-MENDEZ 2,946.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES-SHANNON CENTER 917.37 CEQA CONFERENCE 16.00 EAST BAY COMMUNITY ENERGY MTG EXP-HERNANDEZ 103.18 EAST BAY HOUSING ORGANIZATION CITY DUES 1,294.00 EMPLOYMENT ADS 576.66 GETTING TO ZERO CONFERENCE EXP-PARNES 881.96 HARVEST FAIR EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES 434.05 HERITAGE CENTER AND MUSEUM SUPPLIES 1,439.81 ICMA CONFERENCE EXPENSES - L. SMITH 1,732.88 ICMA CONFERENCE EXPENSES -TRIBBY 1,886.35 IMCA CONFERENCE EXPENSES - WETHERFORD 167.00 INT'L CODE COUNCIL CONF EXPENSES - SHREEVE 646.22 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES CONF EXPENSES - JOSEY 164.96 LEARNING RESOURCES NTWRK CONF EXP - J. MENDEZ 2,159.88 LEARNING RESOURCES NTWRK CONF-HATZIKOKOLAKIS 319.39 LUNCH SUPPLIES FOR INFO FAIR 2,764.70 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS CONF EXP- MCDONALD 769.69 MISAC CONFERENCE EXPENSES – EISLER 538.76 NAT’L LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF EXP – GOEL 1,266.20 MMANC/PROCUREMENT OFFICIALS CONF EXP-DHADWAL 1,025.34 INSIDE DUBLIN BUS TOUR AND SUPPLIES 1,145.54 MMANC CONFERENCE EXPENSES-NELSON 152.65 MMANC CONFERENCE EXPENSES-STEFANSKI 1,330.20 NATIONAL PARK & REC ASSN CONF EXPENSES-BUTLER 563.49 NORCAL HR DIRECTOR ASSN CONF EXP-CARTER 946.07 OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES 109.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 763.57 POLICE EQUIPMENT 60.00 POLICE INVESTIGATIONS SUBSCRIPTION 321.08 POLICE INVESTIGATIONS SUPPLIES 1,974.70 POLICE SUPPLIES 1,405.86 POLICE SUPPLIES, RECORDS SUPERVISOR TRNG-HANNA 1,046.41 POLICE TRAINING AND SUPPLIES 1,669.37 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 246.28 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX PAINT SAMPLES 1,952.39 PUBLIC WORKS ASSN CONF REG - PW STAFF 548.72 RECREATION SUPPLIES 4.6.a Packet Pg. 380 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 2 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 700.57 SAFETY WEEK AND EOC TRAINING SUPPLIES 543.00 THE WAVE SUPPLIES 6.00 TRAFFIC COMMISSION BOARD MEETING EXP-KHAN 792.75 TRAFFIC ENG DUES-KHAN, CEQA TRAINING-MIDIDIDDI 369.64 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION & OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,006.41 WORLD WATERPARK ASSN CONF EXPENSES-AMAYA Check Total: 41,713.74 Payments Issued 12/5/2019 Total: 41,713.74 12/06/2019 UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA 11,724.36 LIFE AND AD&D PREMIUM - DEC 2019 Payments Issued 12/6/2019 Total: 11,724.36 12/09/2019 4 PAWS GOOSE CONTROL, INC 1,000.00 GEESE CONTROL SERVICES AUG 2019 1,000.00 GEESE CONTROL SERVICES SEP 2019 Check Total: 2,000.00 12/09/2019 ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,174,978.67 FIRE SERVICES NOV 2019 12/09/2019 ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 30,187.00 MEMBER AGENCY FEES FY19-20 12/09/2019 AMP PRINTING, INC. 167.32 BUSINESS CARDS 12/09/2019 AREVALO, ASHLEY E. 250.00 HERITAGE CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/09/2019 ARMIJO, JOSHUA 58.92 REIMB ADV ROADSIDE IMPAIRMENT TRNG EXPENSES 12/09/2019 AT&T - CALNET 3 508.64 SERVICE TO 11/14/19 12/09/2019 AXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH 2,283.75 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JUL-SEP 2019 12/09/2019 BAO, DESTIN 78.86 REIMB ADV ROADSIDE IMPAIRMENT TRNG EXPENSES 12/09/2019 BATCHU, RAJESH 195.00 PRESCHOOL REFUND 12/09/2019 BERGDOLL, JIM 48.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT AUG 2019 11.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JUL 2019 6.38 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT OCT 2019 46.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT SEP 2019 Check Total: 112.68 12/09/2019 BLAISDELL'S BUSINESS PRODUCTS 3,952.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES-DEC 2019 12/09/2019 BRINKS, INC. 184.78 ARMORED CAR SERVICE-FINANCE NOV 2019 6.12 ARMORED CAR SERVICE-THE WAVE OCT 2019 Check Total: 190.90 12/09/2019 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENT 94.00 CA WATER ENVIRONMENT ASSN RENEWAL-YOUNG 12/09/2019 CHECKERS CATERING 1,022.74 INSIDE DUBLIN GRADUATION RECEPTION 12/09/2019 CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY FOOD BANK 1,447.79 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT OCT 2019 12/09/2019 CHRISP COMPANY 15,595.67 ON-CALL STRIPING AND MARKING SERVICES 12/09/2019 CHRISTIANSEN, JANET M 500.00 REFUND OF CASH COMPLETION BOND 12/09/2019 CRUZ, ADALBERTO 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/09/2019 DEAF COUNSELING ADVOCACY 2,584.09 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JUL-SEP 2019 12/09/2019 DHADWAL, RENUKA 98.42 REIMBURSE MMANC CONFERENCE EXPENSES 12/09/2019 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 175.00 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 11/22/19 12/09/2019 GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION, INC. 158,120.08 PED IMPROVEMENTS AVB/STAGECOACH/WILDWOOD 12/09/2019 GRAKOVSKY, YELENA O. 500.00 HERITAGE CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/09/2019 HOPE HOSPICE, INC. 12,974.23 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT FY19-20 12/09/2019 IARLA, SUZANNE 25.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2019 12/09/2019 INDIGO/HAMMOND + PLAYLE 8,455.98 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN-POLICE BLDG RENOVATION 12/09/2019 IRON MOUNTAIN 218.58 ACAP RECORDS STORAGE NOV 2019 4.6.a Packet Pg. 381 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 3 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 12/09/2019 JAM SERVICES INC 114.71 ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL SYSTEMS EQUIP 214.49 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT Check Total: 329.20 12/09/2019 JOSEY, JEAN 49.78 REIMB LEAGUE OF CA CITIES CONF EXPENSES 12/09/2019 KINDERMUSIK W/ MS LINDSAY & 1,800.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/09/2019 KUMAGAI, SHAWN 1,038.42 REIMB LEAGUE OF CA CITIES CONF EXPENSES 12/09/2019 LITTLE HEARTS DAY CARE 1,000.00 REFUND OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FEE 12/09/2019 LOGOBOSS 2,520.11 2019 BUSINESS ANNIVERSARY PLAQUES 12/09/2019 MAKE ME A PRO SPORTS 2,355.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/09/2019 MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. 35,712.82 IRON HORSE TRAIL CROSSING DESIGN SVCS 12/09/2019 MCPHERSON, LISA 1,154.31 HEALTH PREMIUM REIMBURSEMENT 12/09/2019 MENDEZ, ANDREA 57.54 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT-OCT 2019 12/09/2019 MEYERS NAVE 500.00 LEGAL SERVICES-COST ONLY INVOICE 12/09/2019 MGT OF AMERICA CONSULTING, LLC 1,150.00 SB90 CLAIMS PROCESSING 12/09/2019 MIDIDIDDI, SAI 24.36 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2019 12/09/2019 MINUTEMAN PRESS 191.76 PRINTING OF “NO PLACE FOR HATE” POSTERS 115.00 PRINTING OF “STAND UNITED” POSTERS Check Total: 306.76 12/09/2019 MMANC 75.00 MMANC MEMBERSHIP DUES-IARLA 12/09/2019 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8,642.00 PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AMADOR VALLEY BLVD 330.00 PLAN REVIEW- IRON HORSE TRAIL/DUBLIN BLVD Check Total: 8,972.00 12/09/2019 MONCADA, MARVIN 36.59 REIMB ADV ROADSIDE IMPAIRMENT TRNG EXPENSES 12/09/2019 OFFICE TEAM 1,950.23 TEMPORARY CLERICAL SUPPORT 12/09/2019 OPEN HEART KITCHEN 5,597.50 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JUL-SEP 2019 12/09/2019 PADEN & BLETSSCHER CONSTRUCTN 2,000.00 REFUND OF CASH COMPLETION BOND 12/09/2019 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 3,975.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2019 12/09/2019 PG&E 7,281.60 SERVICE TO 11/01/19 68.44 SERVICE TO 11/05/19 22,590.47 SERVICE TO 11/06/19 6,143.55 SERVICE TO 11/07/19 87.83 SERVICE TO 11/08/19 1,366.97 SERVICE TO 11/12/19 2,142.88 SERVICE TO 11/13/19 1,965.93 SERVICE TO 11/14/19 27,021.79 SERVICE TO 11/15/19 Check Total: 68,669.46 12/09/2019 PUBLIC BENEFIT TECHNOLOGY 420.00 CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO SERVICES OCT 2019 12/09/2019 REVEL ENVIRONMENTAL MFG INC. 23,920.00 TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 12/09/2019 RHODES, WINSTON 426.33 CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT FOR FSA ELECTION 12/09/2019 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 562.22 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DEPT 12/09/2019 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP 1,671.25 PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES OCT 2019 12/09/2019 SIMPLER SYSTEMS, INC 1,500.00 SOFTWARE LICENSING SUPPORT DEC 2019 12/09/2019 SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SVCS INC. 1,347.10 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT AUG 2019 1,352.12 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JUL 2019 1,347.10 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT SEP 2019 Check Total: 4,046.32 12/09/2019 STARGEN, ROBERT 62.00 REIMBURSE EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINTING FEE 4.6.a Packet Pg. 382 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 4 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 12/09/2019 STEFANSKI, JOHN 72.04 REIMB HOMELESSNESS SUMMIT EXPENSES 12/09/2019 SUAREZ & MUNOZ CONSTRUCTION 160,250.13 IMAGINE PLAYGROUND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 12/09/2019 TRAFFIC LOGIX CORP 4,421.90 SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN FALLON RD 12/09/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 35,906.78 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/ STREET LIGHT MAINT SEP 2019 12/09/2019 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV 1,165.84 RECORD/TELEVISE CITY COUNCIL/ PLNG MTGS 12/09/2019 TRI-VALLEY HAVEN, INC 459.95 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT OCT 2019 515.25 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT SEP 2019 Check Total: 975.20 12/09/2019 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 11/22/19 12/09/2019 URBAN FIELD STUDIO 28,518.39 DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES 12/09/2019 VASUDEVAN, PRIYA 1,206.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/09/2019 VSI RISK MGMT & ERGONOMICS INC 857.50 ERGONOMIC EVALUATIONS 12/09/2019 WAGEWORKS, INC. 548.75 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT FEES NOV 2019 12/09/2019 WESTERN PACIFIC SIGNAL LLC 1,600.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECH SUPPORT SVCS 12/09/2019 WETHERFORD, HAZEL 13.30 REIMB ICMA CONFERENCE EXPENSES-WETHERFORD 12/09/2019 WONG, ANNE 48.75 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 12/09/2019 ZAVERI, PARIMAL 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND Payments Issued 12/9/2019 Total: 1,826,193.12 12/13/2019 CAL PERS 75,987.50 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 12/6/19 12/13/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 20,861.92 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 12/6/19 12/13/2019 I C M A 401 PLAN 2,527.75 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 12/6/19 12/13/2019 I C M A 457 PLAN 25,171.19 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 12/6/19 12/13/2019 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 67,014.10 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 12/6/19 12/13/2019 US BANK - PARS 1,822.81 PARS: PE 12/6/19 12/13/2019 WAGEWORKS, INC. 4,195.71 WAGEWORKS: PE 12/6/19 Payments Issued 12/13/2019 Total: 197,580.98 12/16/2019 4LEAF INC. 94,914.00 BUILDING INSPECTION/PLAN CHECK SVCS NOV 2019 12/16/2019 A SPECIAL TOUCH FUNERAL SVC 250.00 HERITAGE CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/16/2019 ACTIVE NETWORKS, LLC 42,500.00 RECREATION SOFTWARE UPGRADE 12/16/2019 ALL 4 DANCE 200.00 SPLATTER FESTIVAL ENTERTAINMENT 12/16/2019 AMP PRINTING, INC. 502.55 PRINTING SVCS-IMAGINATION PLAYGROUND OPENING 12/16/2019 AMY'S ENGRAVED SIGNS & AWARDS 150.91 NAMEPLATES – GOEL/ L. SMITH / TRIBBY 227.73 NAMEPLATES - DIAZ/ FABRIGAS Check Total: 378.64 12/16/2019 APWA-AMERICAN PUBLIC WORK ASSN 315.00 APWA MEMBERSHIP-SHAFAQ / PARNES 12/16/2019 ARORA, AKSHAY 5,166.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/16/2019 BALLARD, MITCH 1,000.00 TREE LIGHTING SOUND TECHNICIAN SVCS 12/16/2019 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 161.10 LEGAL NOTICES OCT 2019 12/16/2019 CALIFORNIA SPIRIT ELITE, INC. 453.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/16/2019 CASTRO VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS 356.40 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/16/2019 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 11,995.40 INVESTMENT SERVICES NOV 2019 12/16/2019 COIT SERVICES, INC. 374.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES-CORP YARD 12/16/2019 CONNAUGHTON, JUDITH A. 513.79 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/16/2019 CPS HR CONSULTING 2,480.00 SMART GOALS STAFF TRAINING 12/16/2019 CRANFORD, ROBIN 1,234.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/16/2019 DENG, JUN YUAN 343.50 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/16/2019 DU-ALL SAFETY, LLC 1,885.00 SAFETY CONSULTING & INSPECTION SERVICES 4.6.a Packet Pg. 383 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 5 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 12/16/2019 DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 23.74 PGE SPURR GAS USE 9/4/19-10/2/19 12/16/2019 EAST BAY DIVISION LCC 35.00 EAST BAY DIVISION HOLIDAY RECEPTION-KUMAGAI 12/16/2019 ELLIOTT, ELIZABETH 116.81 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2019 12/16/2019 ENGEO INC 538.50 FALLON CROSSING GHAD MANAGEMENT OCT 2019 17,406.68 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MANAGEMENT OCT 2019 1,160.41 SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD MANAGEMENT OCT 2019 Check Total: 19,105.59 12/16/2019 EVERPRO KIDS 204.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/16/2019 HUBER, JENNIFER B. 1,000.00 UTILITY BOX ART PROJECT 12/16/2019 INCREDIFLIX, INC 2,739.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/16/2019 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 8,671.50 DOWNTOWN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN CEQA REVIEW 12/16/2019 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC. 460.66 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 12/16/2019 LA FAMILIA COUNSELING 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/16/2019 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 21.20 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES NOV 2019 12/16/2019 LESLIE'S POOLMART, INC. 149.91 THE WAVE POOL TEST SUPPLIES 12/16/2019 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC. 1,559.75 EXECUTIVE COACHING SERVICES SEPT-NOV 2019 8,750.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT SVCS NOV 2019 Check Total: 10,309.75 12/16/2019 MARRIOTT, LAUREN 24.01 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2019 12/16/2019 MEIN, STEPHANIE 60.00 REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE WAVE CHRISTMAS TREE 12/16/2019 MINUTEMAN PRESS 56.81 PRINTING OF BUILDING SIGN 12/16/2019 MMANC 75.00 MMANC MEMBERSHIP DUES-DHADWAL 12/16/2019 PLAN JPA 2,011.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS EXPENSE NOV 2019 12/16/2019 PLEASANTON, CITY OF 10,125.57 HUD SECTION 108 LOAN PAYMENT-AXIS COMMUNITY 12/16/2019 PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING 30,096.00 CITY-WIDE SIDEWALK INSPECTION & REPAIRS 12/16/2019 REDDELL, DANIEL E. 900.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/16/2019 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 285.60 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DIVISION 12/16/2019 SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR SVC INC 331.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS DEC 2019 12/16/2019 SANTOS, CARMENCITA 500.00 SENIOR CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/16/2019 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 41,332.00 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX CONSULTANT SVCS OCT 2019 12/16/2019 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 5,051.51 EXTRA JANITORIAL SERVICES NOV 2019 20,631.45 JANITORIAL SERVICES DEC 2019 20,631.45 JANITORIAL SERVICES NOV 2019 Check Total: 46,314.41 12/16/2019 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 630.85 PORTABLE TRAILER DISPOSAL SERVICES NOV 2019 Payments Issued 12/16/2019 Total: 341,352.59 12/18/2019 DSRSD 17,688.59 SERVICE TO 11/14/2019 Payments Issued 12/18/2019 Total: 17,688.59 12/19/2019 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 725.00 2020 CITY MANAGERS CONFERENCE REG - L. SMITH 1,174.81 AFTER SCHOOL REC SUPPLIES 587.93 ANNUAL TAX FORMS AND ENVELOPES 905.64 CA EMERGENCY SERVICES ASSN CONF EXP-CARTER 151.96 CA PARKS & REC SOCIETY CONF EXPENSE-A. MENDEZ 18.00 EAST BAY COMMUNITY ENERGY MTG EXP-HERNANDEZ 1,606.50 EMAIL MARKETING SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES 1,028.62 LEARNING RESRCES NTWRK CONF EXP-HATZIKOKOLAKIS 4.6.a Packet Pg. 384 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 6 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 813.30 PRINTING OF HOLIDAY HAPPENINGS FLYERS/POSTCARDS 627.74 ERGONOMIC EQUIP, OSHA COMPLIANCE SEMINAR 35.00 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT COURSE EXP-MCDONALD 1,146.22 HALLOWEEN LUNCHEON, ECON DEV CONF EXP-IARLA 268.50 HERITAGE CENTER & MUSEUM SUPPLIES 879.68 HUMAN RESOURCES CONFERENCE REG & EXP-BLANCO 628.24 INSIDE DUBLIN SUPPLIES 411.84 INSIDE DUBLIN SUPPLIES, CSMFO DUES-RAMIREZ 745.48 INT'L CODE COUNCIL CONF EXPENSES-SHREEVE 55.00 INT'L CODE COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP-SHREEVE 1,000.00 JUNIOR WARRIORS COACHES WORKSHOP 1,082.26 LEARNING RESOURCES NETWORK CONF EXP-MEIN 929.51 LEARNING RESOURCES NETWORK CONF EXP-J. MENDEZ 110.00 LOCAL GOV'T HISPANIC NETWORK DUES-WETHERFORD 75.00 MMANC ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP-STEFANSKI 233.68 NEW AMERICAN BACKYARD DOMAIN REGISTRATION 799.42 NORCAL RECYCLE ASSN DUES/CONF EXPENSE-PARNES 119.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 73.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 879.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES & NEW LAW CONF REG - BLANCO 182.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES, SOCIAL MEDIA CONF REG-KATZ 126.30 PARKS & COMM SVCS MANAGEMENT RETREAT SUPPLIES 2,904.23 POLICE SUPPLIES 520.00 POLICE VEHICLE TINTING 1,251.79 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES & FIELD TRIPS 3,239.57 PRINTING/POSTAGE-DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN NOTICES 474.00 PUBLIC SAFETY BOOTH SUPPLIES 9.36 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX SIGN BACKERS 771.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES, BUSINESS WRITING CLASS-SHAFAQ 45.00 SB743 WORKSHOP EXPENSE-KHAN 1,024.38 SENIOR CENTER SUPPLIES 510.17 SMART GOALS TRAINING EXP FOR MGRS & SUPERVISORS 105.00 TEAM DUBLIN SUPPLIES 381.74 THE WAVE SUPPLIES 35.00 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING EXP-HAUBERT 1,466.41 VETERAN'S DAY LUNCH, EGGSTRAVAGANZA SUPPLIES 429.00 WORLD WATERPARK ASSN MEMBERSHIP-AMAYA Check Total: 30,588.08 Payments Issued 12/19/2019 Total: 30,588.08 12/20/2019 4IMPRINT INC 1,720.11 SCHOOL SAFETY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 12/20/2019 4LEAF INC. 2,170.00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS SERVICES-CIP NOV 2019 2,852.00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS SERVICES-CIP OCT 2019 Check Total: 5,022.00 4.6.a Packet Pg. 385 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 7 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 12/20/2019 ADAMS, GISELLE 500.00 SENIOR CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 ADVANCED INTEGRATED PEST 945.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES NOV 2019 12/20/2019 ALAMEDA CO SHERIFF'S OFFICE 374.00 PRINTING SERVICES NOV 2019 12/20/2019 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC 5,186.40 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES - 11/17/19 TO 11/30/19 11,669.40 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES - 11/3/19 TO 11/16/19 Check Total: 16,855.80 12/20/2019 ALPHA MEDIA LLC 3,000.00 SPLATTER FESTIVAL RADIO ADVERTISING 12/20/2019 AMADOR VALLEY INDUSTRIES LLC 2,704,260.72 RESIDENTIAL GARBAGE SERVICES JUL-DEC 2019 12/20/2019 AMP PRINTING, INC. 318.42 BUSINESS CARDS 12/20/2019 ANASTASIS DBA RADIANCE SCHOOL 200.00 SPLATTER PERFORMANCE 12/20/2019 APEX GRADING 50,593.72 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MAINTENANCE 15,000.00 SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD MAINTENANCE Check Total: 65,593.72 12/20/2019 ARLEN NESS ENTERPRISE 4,401.19 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 12/20/2019 ARRINGTON, MICHELLE 72.00 RECREATION REFUND 12/20/2019 ASSOC. OF DEFENSE COMMUNITIES 450.00 ASSN OF DEFENSE COMMUNITIES DUES-STEFANSKI 12/20/2019 AT&T - CALNET 3 290.62 SERVICE TO 11/26/19 127.51 SERVICE TO 11/27/19 120.57 SERVICE TO 12/01/19 Check Total: 538.70 12/20/2019 BARTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC 2,706.00 ACTUARIAL CONSULTING SERVICES OCT 2019 12/20/2019 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 884.41 PLANNING LEGAL NOTICES NOV 2019 12/20/2019 BAY ISLAND OFFICIAL ASSOC 1,008.00 SPORTS OFFICIATING SERVICES SEPT 2019 12/20/2019 BELINGHERI, MEGAN 32.72 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 12/20/2019 BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 10,063.61 DESIGN SUPPORT FOR DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING 12/20/2019 BERGDOLL, JIM 752.00 REIMB AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN MEMBER DUES 12/20/2019 BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1,457.00 CONCEPT DESIGNS/CONSTR DOCS FALLON PARK 12/20/2019 BIG O TIRES #7 422.16 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 12/20/2019 BKF ENGINEERS 58,050.95 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY DUBLIN BLVD 12/20/2019 BRINKS, INC. 195.77 ARMORED CAR SERVICE-FINANCE DEC 2019 2.04 ARMORED CAR SERVICE-THE WAVE NOV 2019 Check Total: 197.81 12/20/2019 BSK ASSOCIATES INC. 828.00 CONSTR INSPECTION/TESTING-IMAGINE PLAYGROUND 1,689.00 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES-CLOVER PARK Check Total: 2,517.00 12/20/2019 CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE 50,382.97 RETENTION DEPOSIT-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 12/20/2019 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 5,187.98 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT-CIP 6,225.98 PSC NETWORK SWITCHES/SONICWALL SECURITY Check Total: 11,413.96 12/20/2019 CELLEBRITE USA, CORP. 3,700.00 ANNUAL SOFTWARE RENEWAL 12/20/2019 CHAN, ROSA 338.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/20/2019 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC 2,219.00 CIVIC CENTER INTERNET SERVICE DEC 2019 12/20/2019 COIT SERVICES, INC. 646.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES-SHANNON CENTER 12/20/2019 COMCAST 2,300.00 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION INTERNET SVCS 12/20/2019 COMCAST 1,418.61 INTERNET/CABLE SVCS - VARIOUS CITY DEPTS 12/20/2019 CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES 20,264.86 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES NOV 2019 12/20/2019 CSI FORENSIC SUPPLY 1,450.28 POLICE EVIDENCE SUPPLIES 12/20/2019 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING 3,199.00 ENGINEERING SVCS MAINT CORP YARD IMPROVEMENTS 12/20/2019 DENALECT ALARM COMPANY 336.00 QUARTERLY ALARM CHARGE FIRE STATION 18 4.6.a Packet Pg. 386 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 8 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 12/20/2019 DOWNTOWN DISPLAYS LLC 1,200.00 ANNUAL FEE FOR DOWNTOWN WI-FI TOWER 12/20/2019 DSRSD 238,967.99 SERVICE TO 11/30/2019 12/20/2019 DUBLIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 945.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FY19-20 12/20/2019 DUBLIN DAWGS 219.00 RECREATION REFUND 12/20/2019 DUBLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PFC 475.00 SENIOR CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 DUBLIN SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION 328.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL INSURANCE REFUND 12/20/2019 DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,410.99 STAGER GYM ELECTRIC 10/14/19-11/12/19 12/20/2019 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 840.00 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS NOV 2019 12/20/2019 EAST BAY POOL SERVICE, INC. 8,620.00 POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE WAVE 12/20/2019 ENGEO INC 1,509.47 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MANAGEMENT 3,118.16 SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD MANAGEMENT Check Total: 4,627.63 12/20/2019 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR 1,961.06 VEHICLE RENTAL-SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT 12/20/2019 EVERYTHING GROWS INTERIOR 192.77 PLANT SERVICE DEC 2019 12/20/2019 FEDEX 34.77 EXPRESS SHIPPING 12/20/2019 FOSS, CHRISTOPHER 2,315.36 REIMBURSEMENT FOR IT EQUIPMENT PER CONTRACT 12/20/2019 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 175.00 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 12/6/19 12/20/2019 GATES & ASSOCIATES, INC., DAVID L. 7,125.00 PLAN REVIEW DON BIDDLE COMMUNITY PARK 12/20/2019 GHD, INC. 3,551.50 VEHICLE SPEED SURVEY 12/20/2019 GLUMAC 4,500.00 COMMISSIONING AGENT SERVICES FOR PSC PROJECT 12/20/2019 GOEL, ARUN 1,254.53 REIMBURSE NAT'L LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF EXPENSES 12/20/2019 GOLDEN STATE FLEET SVCS INC 100.00 POLICE VEHICLE TOW 12/20/2019 GROUP 4 ARCHITECTURE, 27,304.50 CULTURAL ARTS CENTER DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION 12/20/2019 GUITAR CENTER 250.00 HERITAGE CHURCH RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 HAAG, JERRY P 625.00 CEQA DOCS TASSAJARA PRECISE PLAN 12/20/2019 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & ASSOC 9,892.19 SALES TAX AUDIT CONSULTING OCT-DEC 2019 12/20/2019 IARLA, SUZANNE 75.23 REIMB SILICON VALLEY ECON DEV ASSN CONF 12/20/2019 IRON MOUNTAIN 218.58 ACAP RECORDS STORAGE DEC 2019 360.81 POLICE RECORDS STORAGE - DEC 2019 Check Total: 579.39 12/20/2019 JAM SERVICES INC 196.65 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT 12/20/2019 KAKANI, NIMISHA 120.00 RECREATION REFUND 12/20/2019 KATZ, STEFANI 112.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT DEC 2019 12/20/2019 KING, ARTHUR SCOTT 57.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/20/2019 KISLING, KAITLIN 250.00 HERITAGE CHURCH RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 KLEIST-CORWIN, JULAINA 240.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/20/2019 KOLLI, RAGINI 30.00 RECREATION REFUND 12/20/2019 LADNER, JAMES C 650.00 SANTA SERVICES FOR CHRISTMAS EVENTS 12/20/2019 LANLOGIC INC. 4,255.00 INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONSULTING SVCS NOV 2019 1,050.00 MALWARE SOFTWARE MONITORING NOV 2019 425.00 NETWORK MONITORING SERVICES NOV 2019 1,092.79 WIRELESS ACCESS POINTS-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX Check Total: 6,822.79 12/20/2019 LAWSON MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 480.00 THE WAVE CHEMICAL ROOM FAN REPAIR SERVICE 12/20/2019 LI, OU 199.00 RECREATION REFUND 12/20/2019 LIVERMORE AUTO GROUP 151.21 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 12/20/2019 LOEWKE PLANNING ASSOCIATES 1,635.00 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES NOV 2019 12/20/2019 MAILFINANCE INC. 1,066.39 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE PAYMENT OCT-DEC 2019 4.6.a Packet Pg. 387 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 9 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 12/20/2019 MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. 54,536.85 IRON HORSE TRAIL CROSSING DESIGN SVCS 12/20/2019 MCE CORPORATION 410,739.88 BUILDING MAINTENANCE NOV 2019 9,497.42 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DSRSD NOV 2019 Check Total: 420,237.30 12/20/2019 MCGLASHAN, RHONDA 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 MEIN, STEPHANIE 59.74 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - OCT 2019 12/20/2019 MEYERS NAVE 68,492.74 LEGAL SERVICES OCT 2019 12/20/2019 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L, INC. 1,510.00 HOUSING CONSULTING SERVICES AUG-SEP 2019 1,235.00 HOUSING CONSULTING SERVICES OCT 2019 Check Total: 2,745.00 12/20/2019 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 1,750.00 CONSTR MGMT-DUBLIN BLVD TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJ 6,020.00 INSPECTION SERVICES-IMAGINE PLAYGROUND 2,810.00 PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AMADOR VALLEY BLVD 660.00 PLAN REVIEW- IRON HORSE TRAIL/DUBLIN BLVD Check Total: 11,240.00 12/20/2019 NWN CORPORATION 19,109.61 REPLACEMENT COMPUTERS FOR POLICE VEHICLE 12/20/2019 OH, SEUNGKYUM 242.00 RECREATION REFUND 12/20/2019 ONE WORKPLACE L. FERRARI LLC 232.01 OFFICE FURNITURE 6,513.25 OFFICE FURNITURE-INFO SYSTEMS Check Total: 6,745.26 12/20/2019 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 3,628.50 2019 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT NOV 2019 3,150.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES NOV 2019 4,060.00 PROJECT MGMT-ALAMO CREEK TRAIL REPAIRS 2,366.00 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Check Total: 13,204.50 12/20/2019 PANDYA, NISHANT 500.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 PG&E 8,164.17 SERVICE TO 11/24/19 113.28 SERVICE TO 11/25/19 117.63 SERVICE TO 11/26/19 50.27 SERVICE TO 11/27/19 244.35 SERVICE TO 12/01/19 9,264.65 SERVICE TO 12/02/19 13,713.64 SERVICE TO 12/03/19 Check Total: 31,667.99 12/20/2019 PGADESIGN INC. 580.75 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SVCS-CLOVER PARK 12/20/2019 PIZZA GUYS 374.00 THE WAVE BIRTHDAY PARTY PACKAGE SUPPLIES 12/20/2019 PLEASANTON EVENT RENTALS INC 53.66 TREE LIGHTING SUPPLIES RENTAL 12/20/2019 PRESSWALA, SHAFAQ 250.00 LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 PULTE HOMES 90,056.00 REFUND OF CASH COMPLETION BOND 15,000.00 REFUND OF LANDSCAPE BOND Check Total: 105,056.00 12/20/2019 PUREWAL, NAVDEEP 375.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 QUENCH USA, INC. 895.90 WATER FILTER SYSTEM SERVICES 12/20/2019 QUETEL CORPORATION 1,574.00 ANNUAL TECHNICAL SUPPORT RENEWAL 12/20/2019 RAYNE OF SAN JOSE 156.83 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES FS16 DEC 2019 175.95 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES FS17 DEC 2019 131.85 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES FS18 DEC 2019 Check Total: 464.63 4.6.a Packet Pg. 388 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 10 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 12/20/2019 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB. INC. 6,440.00 FORENSIC DRUG & ALCOHOL EXAMS 12/20/2019 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 81.60 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DIVISION 12/20/2019 ROY, RUSHIL 250.00 CIVIC CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 SAN RAMON VALLEY OFFICIALS AS 803.00 ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIATING SERVICES NOV 2019 2,132.00 ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIATING SERVICES OCT 2019 Check Total: 2,935.00 12/20/2019 SAN RAMON, CITY OF 168,590.19 DRFA WORKERS COMP/MEDICAL BENEFITS JUL-SEP 2019 12/20/2019 SAUSAL CORPORATION 959,176.32 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 12/20/2019 SDI PRESENCE, LLC. 2,506.00 ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLNG SELECTION ASSISTANCE 12/20/2019 SHAMROCK OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LLC 1,737.27 COPIER MAINTENANCE & COPIES DEC 2019 3.31 PRINTER OVERAGES NOV 2019 11.47 PRINTER SUPPLIES 18,889.33 REPLACEMENT PLOTTER Check Total: 20,641.38 12/20/2019 SHASTRI, CHITRA 90.00 RECREATION REFUND 12/20/2019 SILVA, LAURA 12.06 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT-NOV 2019 12/20/2019 SINGH, SUKHDEV 126.00 RECREATION REFUND 12/20/2019 SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SVCS INC. 1,347.10 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT OCT 2019 12/20/2019 STONERIDGE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE 108.18 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 12/20/2019 STUDIO BLUE REPROGRAPHICS 100.53 SCANNING SERVICES 12/20/2019 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 34,239.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING PROJ 12/20/2019 THE COOLTONES BIG BAND 900.00 SENIOR CENTER PROGRAM BAND PERFORMENCE 12/20/2019 TIREHUB, LLC. 2,353.36 POLICE VEHICLE TIRES & MAINTENANCE 12/20/2019 T-MOBILE USA, INC. 434.51 CELL PHONE SERVICES NOV 2019 12/20/2019 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 2,573.78 INTERNET & PHONE SVCS TO 01/08/20 2,760.13 INTERNET & PHONE SVCS TO 12/08/19 Check Total: 5,333.91 12/20/2019 TRB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 9,990.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES NOV 2019 12/20/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 1,493.92 RETURN OF ASSET SEIZURE FUNDS 12/20/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 17,320.80 FUEL OCT 2019 12/20/2019 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV 15,095.77 TRI-VALLEY PEG CONTRIBUTION FY19/20 (PMT 2 OF 2) 52,447.00 OPERATING SUBSIDY FY19-20 (PMT 2 OF 2) 1,222.10 RECORD/TELEVISE CITY COUNCIL/ PLNG MTGS NOV 2019 Check Total: 68,764.87 12/20/2019 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 12/6/19 12/20/2019 VERIZON WIRELESS 2,197.54 POLICE CELL PHONE SERVICE TO 12/03/19 1,672.44 POLICE SITCAM SIM CARD SERVICE TO 12/03/19 Check Total: 3,869.98 12/20/2019 WASSERMAN, EMILY 250.00 LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 12/20/2019 WEISS, ROBIN S. 405.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/20/2019 WETHERFORD, HAZEL 76.56 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2019 12/20/2019 WORKBRIGHT 8,400.00 ANNUAL ONBOARDING SUBSCRIPTION 12/20/2019 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 7,396.00 PROJECT MGMT SVCS-DON BIDDLE COMMUNITY PARK Payments Issued 12/20/2019 Total: 5,373,580.20 12/27/2019 CAL PERS 77,879.32 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 12/20/19 12/27/2019 CAL PERS HEALTH PREMIUM 125,159.60 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM - JAN 2020 12/27/2019 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA 11,190.67 DELTA DENTAL PREMIUM - JAN 2020 4.6.a Packet Pg. 389 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 11 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 12/27/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 18,050.27 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 12/20/19 12/27/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 200.00 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 12/20/19 Vendor Total: 18,250.27 12/27/2019 I C M A 401 PLAN 2,527.75 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 12/20/19 12/27/2019 I C M A 457 PLAN 23,303.87 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 12/20/19 12/27/2019 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 57,111.25 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 12/20/19 12/27/2019 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 896.69 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 12/20/19 Vendor Total: 58,007.94 12/27/2019 US BANK - PARS 2,912.02 PARS: PE 12/20/19 12/27/2019 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) 1,278.53 VISION INSURANCE PREMIUM - JAN 2020 12/27/2019 WAGEWORKS, INC. 4,194.81 WAGEWORKS: PE 12/20/19 Payments Issued 12/27/2019 Total: 324,704.78 01/07/2020 UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA 11,266.07 LIFE AND AD&D PREMIUM - JAN 2020 Payments Issued 1/7/2020 Total: 11,266.07 01/08/2020 AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR & 56,582.85 STREET RESURFACING 2019 SLURRY SEAL 01/08/2020 DU-ALL SAFETY, LLC 1,160.00 SAFETY CONSULTING & INSPECTION SERVICES 01/08/2020 FAIR FINANCIAL CORP 500.00 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT REFUND 01/08/2020 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 175.00 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 12/20/19 01/08/2020 LENNAR HOMES 100,000.00 IMPACT FEE RIGHT TO REIMBURSEMENT 01/08/2020 OFFICE TEAM 2,335.46 TEMPORARY CLERICAL SUPPORT 01/08/2020 PULTE HOMES 157,589.00 IMPACT FEE RIGHT TO REIMBURSEMENT 01/08/2020 PULTE HOMES 10,000.00 REFUND OF LANDSCAPE BOND Vendor Total: 167,589.00 01/08/2020 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 761.60 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DIVISION 01/08/2020 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 12/20/19 01/08/2020 WAGEWORKS, INC. 601.25 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT ADMIN FEES-DEC 2019 Payments Issued 1/8/2020 Total: 330,155.09 01/10/2020 CAL PERS 80,118.15 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 1/3/20 01/10/2020 CALPERS 42,124.80 CALPERS REPLACEMENT BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 01/10/2020 CALPERS 5,747.92 CALPERS ARREARS CONTRIBUTIONS 01/10/2020 CALPERS 500.00 CALPERS ADMIN FEE Vendor Total: 48,372.72 01/10/2020 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 23,333.90 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 1/3/20 01/10/2020 I C M A 401 PLAN 59,527.75 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 1/3/20 01/10/2020 I C M A 457 PLAN 27,880.88 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 1/3/20 01/10/2020 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 82,531.78 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 1/3/20 01/10/2020 US BANK - PARS 561.09 PARS: PE 1/3/20 01/10/2020 WAGEWORKS, INC. 81,284.50 WAGEWORKS: PE 1/3/20 Payments Issued 1/10/2020 Total: 403,610.77 01/13/2020 BAUDVILLE 136.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01/13/2020 CALBO 845.00 CA BUILDING OFFICIALS CONFERENCE REG-SHREEVE 01/13/2020 CASTRO VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS 1,143.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/13/2020 CONNAUGHTON, JUDITH A. 264.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/13/2020 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 971.25 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS DEC 2019 4.6.a Packet Pg. 390 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 12 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/13/2020 EAST BAY CHAPTER ICC 270.00 INT'L CODE COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP DUES-SHREEVE 01/13/2020 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 175.00 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 1/3/20 01/13/2020 GREENPLAY, LLC. 1,780.10 PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE 01/13/2020 HARRELL HARRIS PHOTOGRAPHY 435.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES - HOLIDAY TREE LIGHTING 345.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES - THE WAVE Check Total: 780.00 01/13/2020 HAYWARD RUBBER STAMP CO INC 397.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01/13/2020 HOME DEPOT USA, INC. 46.20 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE 01/13/2020 INT'L ASSN OF ELECTRICAL INSP 28.00 2020 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE BOOKS 01/13/2020 KLUBER ASSOCIATES, INC 906.00 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS DEC 2019 01/13/2020 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC. 1,400.00 EXECUTIVE TEAM RETREAT 01/13/2020 MEREDITH FAMILY INC 1,324.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/13/2020 PG&E 237.92 SERVICE TO 12/03/19 19,580.72 SERVICE TO 12/06/19 4,500.98 SERVICE TO 12/08/19 7,734.07 SERVICE TO 12/09/19 103.22 SERVICE TO 12/10/19 3,495.11 SERVICE TO 12/11/19 414.14 SERVICE TO 12/12/19 17,205.60 SERVICE TO 12/15/19 11,784.17 SERVICE TO 12/16/19 10.71 SERVICE TO 12/18/19 5,074.75 SERVICE TO 12/25/19 324.17 SERVICE TO 12/31/19 Check Total: 70,465.56 01/13/2020 PIZZA GUYS 350.00 THE WAVE BIRTHDAY PARTY PACKAGE SUPPLIES 01/13/2020 PUBLIC BENEFIT TECHNOLOGY 460.00 CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO SVCS NOV 2019 01/13/2020 ROSAS BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION 3,316.81 RETENTION RELEASE-SIDEWALK SAFETY REPAIR 01/13/2020 SELECT IMAGING 132.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01/13/2020 STANFORD HEALTH -VALLEYCARE 185.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS 01/13/2020 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 87,703.07 EDEN SOFTWARE SUPPORT 2020 01/13/2020 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 1/3/20 01/13/2020 URBAN FIELD STUDIO 12,507.05 DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES 01/13/2020 VASUDEVAN, PRIYA 198.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/13/2020 WC3-WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANT 36,720.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES NOV 2019 01/13/2020 WEE HOOP, INC. 1,458.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR Payments Issued 1/13/2020 Total: 224,413.74 01/17/2020 4 PAWS GOOSE CONTROL, INC 1,000.00 GEESE CONTROL SERVICES NOV 2019 01/17/2020 4LEAF INC. 88,875.50 BUILDING INSPECTION/PLAN CHECK SVCS DEC 2019 01/17/2020 ADVANCED INTEGRATED PEST 945.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES DEC 2019 01/17/2020 ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 48,521.88 ZONE 7 FEES COLLECTED OCT-DEC 2019 01/17/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC 12,879.56 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 12/1/19 TO 12/14/19 6,483.00 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 12/15/19 TO 12/28/19 Check Total: 19,362.56 01/17/2020 AMP PRINTING, INC. 62.44 BUSINESS CARDS 01/17/2020 ARLEN NESS ENTERPRISE 911.12 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 01/17/2020 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING 18,176.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2019 4.6.a Packet Pg. 391 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 13 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 21,264.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OCT 2019 24,784.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - SEP 2019 Check Total: 64,224.00 01/17/2020 AT&T - CALNET 3 120.01 SERVICE TO 01/01/20 1,174.34 SERVICE TO 12/12/19 484.55 SERVICE TO 12/14/19 289.96 SERVICE TO 12/26/19 126.76 SERVICE TO 12/27/19 Check Total: 2,195.62 01/17/2020 BIG O TIRES #7 336.76 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 01/17/2020 BRIGGS, VERONICA 200.68 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 01/17/2020 CAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY INC 977.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2019 01/17/2020 CALICO CENTER 4,500.00 ANNUAL FORENSIC SERVICE FEE - 2020 01/17/2020 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS 1,191.60 GREEN BUILDING FEES OCT-DEC 2019 01/17/2020 CINTAS CORP 149.40 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES 01/17/2020 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 550.00 MUNI CODE CODIFICATION 01/17/2020 CORWOOD CAR WASH, INC. 590.00 POLICE CAR WASHES - NOV/DEC 2019 01/17/2020 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 4,191.03 SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING FEE OCT-DEC 2019 01/17/2020 DIV OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 632.00 BUSINESS LICENSE ADMIN CASP FEE OCT-DEC 01/17/2020 DOCTOR DIESEL 1,915.00 ANNUAL DIESEL TANK SERVICE - FIRE STATION 940.00 ANNUAL DIESEL TANK SERVICE-CIVIC CENTER Check Total: 2,855.00 01/17/2020 DSRSD 4,114.87 SERVICE TO 12/31/2019 01/17/2020 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 472.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2019 01/17/2020 ELECTRICBABY, INC. 1,080.00 HOUSING CONSULTING SERVICES DEC 2019 01/17/2020 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR 1,961.06 VEHICLE RENTAL-SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT 01/17/2020 EVERYTHING GROWS INTERIOR 198.55 PLANT SERVICE JAN 2020 01/17/2020 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS, INC. 4,652.00 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE/STRMWTR RESOURCE PLAN 01/17/2020 HERC RENTALS INC. 13,034.68 SPLATTER FESTIVAL ELECTRICAL SERVICES 01/17/2020 IRON MOUNTAIN 447.14 POLICE RECORDS STORAGE - JAN 2020 01/17/2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 5,840.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2019 18,240.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OCT 2019 Check Total: 24,080.00 01/17/2020 LIVERMORE AUTO GROUP 4,078.18 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 01/17/2020 MCE CORPORATION 9,497.42 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DSRSD DEC 2019 01/17/2020 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 35,910.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OCT 2019 01/17/2020 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 7,722.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2019 01/17/2020 PG&E 1,409.43 SERVICE TO 12/07/19 01/17/2020 PHOENIX GROUP INFO SYS. 515.90 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING - NOV 2019 01/17/2020 PLEASANTON, CITY OF 8,298.75 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE DEBT PMT OCT-DEC 2019 01/17/2020 PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING 15,840.00 CITY-WIDE SIDEWALK INSPECTION & REPAIRS 01/17/2020 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB. INC. 185.00 FORENSIC DRUG & ALCOHOL EXAMS 01/17/2020 SCHOOL OF IMAGINATION 2,308.00 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE 01/17/2020 SERVICE CHAMPIONS 57.60 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE 01/17/2020 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC 6,780.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES DEC 2019 01/17/2020 SIERRA DISPLAY, INC. 15,682.73 BANNER INSTALLATION & CHANGE-OUT SVCS 01/17/2020 SNG & ASSOCIATES INC. 22,129.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2019 26,776.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OCT 2019 Check Total: 48,905.75 4.6.a Packet Pg. 392 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 14 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/17/2020 SPECIFIED PLAY EQUIPMENT CO 206,785.95 IMAGINE PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT/CONSTRUCTION 01/17/2020 STONERIDGE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE 2,129.68 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 01/17/2020 STUDIO BLUE REPROGRAPHICS 182.05 PRINTING SERVICES - MAPE MEMORIAL PARK PROJECT 01/17/2020 SUAREZ & MUNOZ CONSTRUCTION 143,683.75 IMAGINE PLAYGROUND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 01/17/2020 SURF TO SNOW ENVIRONMENTAL 1,176.25 SPILL RESPONSE ASSISTANCE & MRP INSPECTIN 01/17/2020 TJ KRISTI CORPORATION 300.00 FUEL TANK INSPECTIONS 01/17/2020 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 221.09 FINGERPRINT PROCESSING NOV 2019 01/17/2020 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 4,143.38 EXTRA JANITORIAL SERVICES DEC 2019 20,631.45 JANITORIAL SERVICES JAN 2020 3,535.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DEC 2019 3,613.76 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES NOV 2019 Check Total: 31,924.57 01/17/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 630.85 PORTABLE TRAILER DISPOSAL SERVICES 01/17/2020 VALLEY WINDOW CLEANING INC 3,950.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES - THE WAVE 01/17/2020 WESCO GRAPHICS INC 8,046.61 SPRING ACTIVITY GUIDE PRINTING & MAILING 01/17/2020 YOUNG, SHANNAN 105.03 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2019 268.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT DEC 2019 Check Total: 373.11 01/17/2020 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 10,363.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2019 12,513.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OCT 2019 Check Total: 22,876.00 Payments Issued 1/17/2020 Total: 871,783.56 01/21/2020 DUEMLING PROPERTIES 2,424.50 REFUND DEVELOPER DEPOSIT 01/21/2020 NEOPOST USA INC 4,000.00 REPLENISH POSTAGE MACHINE 01/21/2020 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 4,067.08 2020 CAMPS & AQUATICS GUIDE POSTAGE/MAILING Payments Issued 1/21/2020 Total: 10,491.58 01/24/2020 CAL PERS 76,573.77 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 1/17/20 01/24/2020 CALPERS 21,801.86 CALPERS REPLACEMENT BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION 01/24/2020 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 17,093.89 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 1/17/20 01/24/2020 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 4,331.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE REIMB Q2 FY19/20 01/24/2020 I C M A 401 PLAN 2,527.75 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 1/17/20 01/24/2020 I C M A 457 PLAN 21,359.46 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 1/17/20 01/24/2020 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 54,492.59 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 1/17/20 01/24/2020 US BANK - PARS 2,502.62 PARS: PE 1/17/20 01/24/2020 WAGEWORKS, INC. 4,594.50 WAGEWORKS: PE 1/17/20 Payments Issued 1/24/2020 Total: 205,277.44 01/27/2020 4 PAWS GOOSE CONTROL, INC 1,000.00 GEESE CONTROL SERVICES DEC 2019 01/27/2020 ACCOPSA -ALAMEDA COUNTY CHIEFS 950.00 POLICE POST EXECUTIVE SEMINAR 2020-HOLMES 01/27/2020 ADAMS SAFETY TRAINING 144.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/27/2020 ALAMEDA COUNTY TRAINING CENTER 125.00 FINANCES FOR NON-FINANCIAL MNGRS TRNG-MIDIDIDDI 01/27/2020 AT&T - CALNET 3 46.47 SERVICE TO 01/06/20 1,167.15 SERVICE TO 01/12/20 500.75 SERVICE TO 01/14/20 Check Total: 1,714.37 01/27/2020 BAY ALARM COMPANY 335.76 ALARM SERVICES CIVIC CENTER 600.00 ALARM SERVICES CORP YARD 4.6.a Packet Pg. 393 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 15 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 172.50 ALARM SERVICES FIRE STATION 16 237.75 ALARM SERVICES FIRE STATION 17 2,232.03 ALARM SERVICES HERITAGE PARK 87.00 ALARM SERVICES POLICE DEPT 268.05 ALARM SERVICES POLICE SERVICES 628.71 ALARM SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 1,269.27 ALARM SERVICES SHANNON CENTER 2,070.00 ALARM SERVICES THE WAVE Check Total: 7,901.07 01/27/2020 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 324.00 LEGAL NOTICES - NOV 2019 01/27/2020 BKF ENGINEERS 18,012.50 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY DUBLIN BLVD 01/27/2020 BLAISDELL'S BUSINESS PRODUCTS 4,034.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES DEC 2019 01/27/2020 BLUETOAD, INC. 510.00 SPRING ACTIVITY GUIDE DIGITAL EDITION 01/27/2020 BRINKS, INC. 195.77 ARMORED CAR SERVICE JAN 2020 4.08 ARMORED CAR SERVICE DEC 2019 Check Total: 199.85 01/27/2020 CA DEPT. OF TAX & FEE ADMIN 36,057.00 SALES & USE TAX RETURN FOR CAL YEAR 2019 01/27/2020 CA SURVEYING & DRAFTING SUPPLY 1,048.74 LARGE FORMAT COLOR PLOTTER SUPPLIES 01/27/2020 CAIRES, SANDRA 38.00 REIMBURSE LIVESCAN FEE 01/27/2020 CAPIO 540.00 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICIALS CONF REG-JACKMAN 01/27/2020 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 82,263.33 PSC NETWORK SWITCHES/SONICWALL SECURITY 46,546.64 SOFTWARE LICENSING-ADOBE, MICROSOFT, SOPHOS 160,370.36 VXRAIL SERVER AND SOFTWARE SUPPORT Check Total: 289,180.33 01/27/2020 CHAN, ROSA 246.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/27/2020 CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY FOOD BANK 1,058.54 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT DEC 2019 01/27/2020 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC 2,219.00 CIVIC CENTER INTERNET SERVICE JAN 2020 01/27/2020 COMCAST 2,300.00 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION INTERNET DEC 2019 01/27/2020 COMMUNICATION ACADEMY 666.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/27/2020 CONVERGEONE, INC. 12,126.64 PHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 11/01/2019-06/30/2020 01/27/2020 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC. 26,135.00 REPLACE TRAFFIC SIGNAL PUSH BUTTONS 01/27/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 271.00 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES DEC 2019 192.00 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES NOV 2019 555.00 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES OCT 2019 Check Total: 1,018.00 01/27/2020 DIABLO PUBLICATIONS 1,256.00 VISIT TRI-VALLEY GUIDE PUBLICATION 01/27/2020 DKS ASSOCIATES 26,949.10 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS FOR BIKE/PED SAFETY 01/27/2020 DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL BAND 3,301.20 BREAKFAST WITH SANTA EVENT SERVICES 01/27/2020 EAST BAY POOL SERVICE, INC. 2,129.65 POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE WAVE 01/27/2020 EDEN I & R INC 12,325.00 2-1-1 ALAMEDA COUNTY SERVICES FY19-20 01/27/2020 GIS WORKSHOP LLC 420.00 SOFTWARE SUPPORT-TRAFFIC SIGN TRACKING 01/27/2020 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SVCS INC 500.00 RECORDS MANAGEMENT SERVICES -DEC 2019 01/27/2020 GREENPLAY, LLC. 2,670.15 PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE 01/27/2020 HAUBERT, DAVID 3,319.18 REIMB U.S. CONF OF MAYORS CONF EXPENSES 01/27/2020 IRON MOUNTAIN 218.58 ACAP RECORDS STORAGE JAN 2020 01/27/2020 JAM SERVICES INC 2,909.48 TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT 01/27/2020 JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY 1,182.97 FIRE ALARM MONITORING SERVICES LIBRARY 01/27/2020 KAPADIA, MARIA 504.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 4.6.a Packet Pg. 394 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 16 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/27/2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 7,091.88 TRAFFIC SIGNAL FIBER INTERCONNECT DESIGN 01/27/2020 KING, ARTHUR SCOTT 57.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/27/2020 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC. 1,817.35 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 01/27/2020 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 9.50 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES DEC 2019 01/27/2020 LANLOGIC INC. 3,792.50 INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONSULTING SVCS DEC 2019 1,050.00 MALWARE SOFTWARE MONITORING DEC 2019 425.00 NETWORK MONITORING SERVICES DEC 2019 Check Total: 5,267.50 01/27/2020 LAWSON MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 2,071.00 REPAIR CHLORINE RM VENTILATION ALARM-THE WAVE 01/27/2020 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 585.00 EAST BAY DIVISION MEMBERSHIP DUES 2020 01/27/2020 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 75.00 CITY MANAGERS CONFERENCE DINNER - L. SMITH Vendor Total: 660.00 01/27/2020 LEJANO, ESTHER 2.63 REFUND OVERPAYMENT OF FTHB LOAN INTEREST 01/27/2020 LIVERMORE VALLEY WINEGROWERS 7,500.00 MARKETING SPONSORSHIP FY19-20 01/27/2020 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC. 3,640.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT SVCS DEC 2019 01/27/2020 MCE CORPORATION 15,776.09 REGIONAL STREET RESTORATION 01/27/2020 MICHAEL CLANCY CONSTRUCTION 2,651.75 REFUND DEVELOPER DEPOSIT 01/27/2020 MISRA, VAISHNAVI 1,248.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/27/2020 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 688.00 PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AMADOR VALLEY BLVD 01/27/2020 MOBILITE, LLC. 1,818.00 REFUND DEVELOPER DEPOSIT 01/27/2020 NAIA BAR GELATO 105.84 THE WAVE CONCESSION SUPPLIES 01/27/2020 NOVANI, LLC. 3,000.00 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS CENTER ANNUAL SUPPORT 01/27/2020 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 150.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-CIP 01/27/2020 PG&E 16,782.82 SERVICE TO 01/01/20 2,085.49 SERVICE TO 01/02/20 22,509.03 SERVICE TO 01/06/20 1,417.50 SERVICE TO 01/07/20 911.64 SERVICE TO 12/11/19 115.84 SERVICE TO 12/26/19 150.17 SERVICE TO 12/29/19 2,226.17 SERVICE TO 12/30/19 Check Total: 46,198.66 01/27/2020 PIZZA GUYS 126.00 THE WAVE BIRTHDAY PARTY PACKAGE SUPPLIES 01/27/2020 PLAN JPA 1,386.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS EXPENSE DEC 2019 01/27/2020 PLEASANTON EVENT RENTALS INC 638.58 CITY MANAGER RETIREMENT EVENT EQUIP RENTAL 01/27/2020 RAYNE OF SAN JOSE 156.83 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES FIRE STATION 16 131.85 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES FIRE STATION 18 Check Total: 288.68 01/27/2020 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 129.20 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DIVISION 01/27/2020 SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR SVC INC 347.55 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS JAN 2020 01/27/2020 SELECT IMAGING 105.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 99.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES Check Total: 204.62 01/27/2020 T-MOBILE USA, INC. 434.51 CELL PHONE SERVICES DEC 2019 01/27/2020 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 11,518.10 FUEL NOV 2019 01/27/2020 TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORT. COUNCIL 70,119.72 TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION FEES OCT-DEC 2019 01/27/2020 WEISS, ROBIN S. 342.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 4.6.a Packet Pg. 395 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Print Date: 02/03/2020 City of Dublin Page 17 of 17 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/27/2020 WEST CORPORATION 2,668.18 CARD READER INSTALLATION COUNCIL A/V ROOM 01/27/2020 WESTERN PACIFIC SIGNAL LLC 4,054.61 CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSULTING/UPGRADES Payments Issued 1/27/2020 Total: 657,245.07 Grand Total for Payments Dated 12/1/2019 through 1/31/2020: 10,890,854.91 Total Number of Payments Issued: 461 4.6.a Packet Pg. 396 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 - J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ( P a y m e n t I s s u a n c e R e p o r t f o r D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 9 a n d J a n u a r y 2 0 2 0 ) Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Shared Autonomous Vehicle Testing - Project Implementation Prepared by: Obaid Khan, Transportation and Operations Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive a presentation on the implementation of the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority Shared Autonomous Vehicle testing program in Dublin. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the presentation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City of Dublin is providing support to Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) on this project and has allocated adequate funding for it in the current Capital Improvement Program (CIP Project ST0519 - Intelligent Transportation System Upgrade - Connected/Autonomous Vehicle and Safety Improvements). The City of Dublin also received a $385,000 grant from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in support of this project. The CIP project budget provides for the local match funding for the MTC grant. There is no impact to the General Fund. DESCRIPTION: On October 12, 2017, the Governor approved Assembly Bill No. 1444 (AB 1444), the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority: Demonstration Project. The law authorized the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) to test Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAV) on City of Dublin public streets through May 1, 2018. While LAVTA has worked towards the implementation of the SAV Testing Project, actual testing has not occurred yet. On February 28, 2018, the California Department of Motor Vehicles adopted regulations for the testing of driverless autonomous vehicles on public streets. The new regulations now allow testing along public streets beyond the original May 1, 2018 sunset date of AB 1444. The City of Dublin received grant funding in the amount of $385,000 from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) through the Innovative Deployments to 7.1 Packet Pg. 397 Page 2 of 3 Enhance Arterials (IDEA) program to support the SAV Testing Project. LAVTA was also successful in receiving a grant in the amount of $966,000 from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District for the project. LAVTA will use some of its funding to provide the SAV for the testing. On September 18, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution 100 -18 (Attachment 1) approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Dublin and LAVTA for the project. On November 19, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution 118-19 (Attachment 2) which amended the MOU to streamline adm inistration of MTC grant funds for the project and expedite project delivery. City staff and LAVTA staff have coordinated to implement SAV testing along certain public streets in the general vicinity of the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station. Attachment 3 provides a general overview of the testing location and the route that the SAV will use to conduct various tests in Dublin. LAVTA recently selected an operator for the project and received National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) approval of the project. NHTSA approved the SAV testing plan on December 12, 2019. SAV testing is expected to begin in early March and will continue for approximately 18 months. During this time various aspects of operation and safety will be tested including communication with the traffic signal at the intersection of Arnold Road and Martinelli Way. While in this testing phase, the SAV will always have an on -board operator who will be able to take control of the vehicle in order to respond to an emergency or any other unforeseen issue. No public passengers will be allowed on the shuttle, however operational features of passenger interaction with the vehicle, such as stopping at shuttle stops and operating the vehicle doors, will be tested by the SAV operator and LAVTA staff. At all times an operator will be present inside the vehicle to take over vehicle operation. In order to facilitate the SAV testing program, LAVTA will install signs along the testing route (Attachment 4). These Localization Signs will be installed at intervals along the edge of the roadway, particularly in areas where there are no other vertical surfaces or improvements because the adjacent properties are not yet developed. The Localization Signs allow the SAV to "see" where it is along the testing route. Additional warning signs will also be installed along the testing route to inform the public of the SAV testing. The signs will be removed once testing is complete. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: Strategy 3: Pursue efforts to help strengthen the City’s infrastructure and technology. Strategic Objective 3A: Continue to embrace technology to improve traffic, street and engineering infrastructure. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: LAVTA will reach out to residents, businesses, and BART users at the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station. The SAV testing sings will also serve to notify street users of the SAV testing work. ATTACHMENTS: 7.1 Packet Pg. 398 Page 3 of 3 1. Resolution No. 100 -18 2. Resolution No. 118-19 3. SAV Testing Route 4. SAV Signs 7.1 Packet Pg. 399 RESOLUTION NO. 100 — 18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY FOR THE SHARED AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TESTING PROJECT IN DUBLIN WHEREAS, The California Legislature enacted AB 1444, which provided Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) the ability for testing of Shared Autonomous Shuttle (SAV) in the City of Dublin (CITY) through May 1, 2018; and WHEREAS, The California Department of Motor Vehicles new regulations allow further testing along Public Streets beyond the May 1, 2018 sunset date of the AB1444; and WHEREAS, LAVTA is in the process of finalizing the testing plan and would like to initiate the SAV testing in the CITY; and WHEREAS, CITY and LAVTA are coordinating on the SAV testing project and have agreed to implement the SAV testing along Public Streets in the general vicinity of the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station (TESTING SITE); and WHEREAS, CITY received grant funding in the amount of $385,000 from Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) through the Innovative Deployments to Enhance Arterials (IDEA) program to support the SAV testing and to enhance bicycle and pedestrian safety in the vicinity of the TESTING SITE; and WHEREAS, LAVTA represents that it has $966,000 in funds from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District committed and available for the implementation of the SAV testing in CITY and part of this funding will be used to acquire and make available the SAV for the testing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin approves the Memorandum of Understanding and authorizes the City Manager to execute the MOU (Exhibit A) and make any non-substantive changes to carry out the intent of this Resolution as well as associated documents for the SAV testing project. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of September 2018, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Goel, Gupta, Hernandez, Thalblum and Mayor Haubert NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor ATTEST: Cu )1•Ti City Clerk Reso No. 100-18, Adopted 9/18/2018, Item No. 4.2 Page 1 of 1 7.1.a Packet Pg. 400 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 0 0 - 1 8 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY FOR THE SHARED AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TESTING PROJECT THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is entered into as of 5i 2018, by and between the CITY OF DUBLIN (CITY), a municipal corporation of the StAte of California, and the LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY (LAVTA), a joint exercise of powers authority established pursuant to California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. RECITALS A. The California Legislature enacted AB 1444, which provided authority for testing Shared Autonomous Vehicle (SAV) in Dublin through May 1, 2018. B. The California Department of Motor Vehicles has adopted new regulations that have allowed further testing along public.streets beyond the May 1, 2018 sunset date of AB1444. C. LAVTA is in the process of finalizing the testing plan for its SAV project and would like to initiate the testing. D. CITY and LAVTA have agreed to implement SAV testing along public streets in the general vicinity of the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station (the "TESTING SITE"). E. CITY received grant funding in the amount of $385,000 from Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) through the Innovative Deployments to Enhance Arterials (IDEA) program to support the SAV testing and to enhance bicycle and pedestrian safety in the vicinity of the TESTING SITE. F. CITY and LAVTA, in cooperation with MTC, desire to implement SAV testing and coordinate on grant funded improvements at a total of six (6) signalized intersections ("PROJECT"). The PROJECT will allow signal equipment to communicate with SAVs, LAVTA buses, and other vehicles. G. The PROJECT will be implemented by CITY with coordination and support from LAVTA. H. LAVTA represents that it has $966,000 in funds from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District committed and available for the implementation of the SAV testing in CITY and part of this funding will be used to acquire and make available the SAV for the PROJECT. MTC, in coordination with CITY, has prepared various PROJECT documents including a Scope of Work for a consultant to design and implement the PROJECT. 14748587.1 7.1.a Packet Pg. 401 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 0 0 - 1 8 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) J. LAVTA represents that it will support CITY in completing the PROJECT. K. City will waive encroachment permit fees associated with the PROJECT. L. LAVTA, as part of its participation in the PROJECT, is ready and able to contribute staff time and resources through the design, construction and operational phases of the PROJECT. NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows: SECTION I PROJECT DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND ADMINISTRATION A. LAVTA AGREES: 1. To cooperate in reviewing PROJECT procurement documents, and the construction contract documents. 2. To designate a LAVTA representative, at its own expense, to work with CITY in coordinating all aspects of the PROJECT including planning, engineering, construction and installation work. 3. To cooperate in CITY's implementation of the MTC's IDEA grant, including any SAV vehicle testing data sharing as permitted by the law and as requested by CITY's SAV consultant for the sole purpose of implementing the PROJECT. 4. To acquire and make available a SAV for the PROJECT. 5. To assist in implementing communications between the PROJECT equipment and the SAV. This may include testing of equipment at off -site facilities used by LAVTA for the SAV testing in CITY. B. CITY AGREES:. 1. To pay for all costs associated with the design and construction of the PROJECT, except for the work that is being performed under MTC's contract relating to the development, design, and construction of the PROJECT. 2. To cooperate with LAVTA and its staff, agents, in planning, designing, constructing, testing, and implementing the PROJECT. 14748587.1 7.1.a Packet Pg. 402 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 0 0 - 1 8 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) 3. To designate, at its own expense, a CITY representative to work with LAVTA in coordinating all aspects of the PROJECT including planning, engineering, construction and installation work. SECTION II MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS PARTIES MUTUALLY AGREE: Upon CITY completing and accepting all work on the PROJECT under this MOU, ownership and title to materials, equipment and appurtenances in relation to the PROJECT installed on LAVTA buses will automatically vest in LAVTA. No further agreement will be necessary to transfer ownership. LAVTA will be the sole owner and will be responsible for operation and maintenance of all PROJECT equipment installed on LAVTA buses as part of the PROJECT. 2. Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties, or affect the legal liability of either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the development, design, construction, operation, improvement or maintenance of public facilities different or greater than the standard of care imposed by law. 3. Neither LAVTA, nor its directors, officers and employees, shall be responsible for any damage, loss, expense, costs or liability occurring by any act or omission by CITY under or in connection with any work,, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless LAVTA and its directors, officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. 4. Neither CITY, nor its officers and employees, shall be responsible for any damage, loss, expense, costs or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission by LAVTA under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to LAVTA under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, LAVTA shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the CITY, and its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of act or omission by LAVTA under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to LAVTA under this Agreement. 5. The PARTIES shall work together in the spirit of good faith and cooperation to successfully implement this Agreement. To the extent there are disagreements between the CITY and LAVTA, those disagreements shall immediately be raised between the parties. Prior to initiating any legal action, the parties hereto agree to meet in good faith to attempt to resolve any dispute. 14748587.1 7.1.a Packet Pg. 403 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 0 0 - 1 8 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) 6. If any term or provision of this Agreement, or the application of any term or provision of this Agreement to a particular situation, shall be finally found to be void, invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, then notwithstanding such determination, such term or provision shall remain in force and effect to the extent allowed by such ruling and all other terms and provisions of this Agreement or the application of this Agreement to other situations shall remain in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any term or provision of this Agreement or the application of such material term or condition to a particular situation is finally found to be void, invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, then the parties hereto agree to work in good faith and fully cooperate with each other to amend this Agreement to carry out its intent. 7. Either the CITY or LAVTA may terminate this Agreement upon 60 days prior written notice to the other party. 8. This Agreement and all work performed thereunder shall be interpreted under and pursuant to the laws of the State of California. 9. Neither party may assign or delegate any of its rights or obligations hereunder without first obtaining the written consent of the other. 10. This Agreement shall commence as of the date entered and shall continue in effect until the parties reach a mutually agreeable date for termination of the Agreement after all work required by this Agreement has been completed. 11. All of the terms, provisions and conditions of the Agreement hereunder, shall be binding upon and inure the parties hereto and their respective successors, assigns and legal representatives. 12. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and all such agreements entered into prior hereto are revoked and superseded by this agreement, and no representations, warranties, inducements or oral agreements have been made by any of the parties except as expressly set forth herein, or in other contemporaneous written agreements. This Agreement may not be changed, modified or rescinded except in writing, signed by all parties hereto, and any attempt at oral modification of this Agreement shall be void and of no effect. 1474 &5$7,1 7.1.a Packet Pg. 404 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 0 0 - 1 8 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL RECOMMENDED FORAPPROVAL I - Gafy Huisingh Public Works Director General Counsel akkerPAttorney Dated: Dated: © its 14748587.1 7.1.a Packet Pg. 405 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 0 0 - 1 8 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL APPROVED AS TO FO 7____ General Counsel Dated: CITY OF DUBLIN Chris L. Foss City Manager RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Gary Huisingh Public Works Director APPROVED AS TO FORM John Bakker City Attorney Dated: 14748587.1 7.1.a Packet Pg. 406 At t a c h m e n t : 1 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 0 0 - 1 8 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) RESOLUTION NO. 118 - 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY FOR THE SHARED AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TESTING PROJECT IN DUBLIN WHEREAS, on September 18, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution 100-18 approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Dublin (CITY) and the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) for the Shared Autonomous Vehicle testing PROJECT) in Dublin to enable LAVTA to implement the PROJECT in accordance with the Assembly Bill 1444 (AB1444); and WHEREAS, the California Department of Motor Vehicles new regulations have now allowed further testing along Public Streets beyond the May 1, 2018 sunset date of the AB1444; and WHEREAS, LAVTA is in the final stages of implementing the PROJECT in the CITY; and WHEREAS, the CITY and LAVTA are coordinating on the PROJECT and have agreed to implement the PROJECT along Public Streets in the general vicinity of the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station (TESTING SITE); and WHEREAS, the CITY received grant funding in the amount of $385,000 from Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) through the Innovative Deployments to Enhance Arterials IDEA) program to support the PROJECT at the TESTING SITE; and WHEREAS, LAVTA represents that it has $966,000 in funds from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District committed and available for the implementation of the PROJECT in CITY and part of this funding will be used to acquire and make available the SAV for the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, LAVTA and the CITY desire to streamline administration of MTC grant funds for the PROJECT and expedite project delivery by adding LAVTA as a partner agency to the MTC grant funding in order to access some MTC-administered funds directly. MTC has approved this change to its Program of Projects by MTC Resolution No. 4202, dated on September 4, 2019; and WHEREAS, LAVTA and the CITY further desire to amend the MOU to include LAVTA as an MTC grant recipient in addition to the CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin amends the Memorandum of Understanding with LAVTA for the shared autonomous vehicle testing project Exhibit A). Reso No. 118-19, Adopted 11/19/19, Item No. 4.3 Page 1 of 2 7.1.b Packet Pg. 407 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 8 - 1 9 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute in the name of the City of Dublin the Amendment and any associated documents for the SAV testing project. vote PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2019, by the following AYES: Councilmembers Goel, Hernandez, Josey, Kumagai and Mayor Haubert NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None o Mayor ATTEST: 6" 4' P. City Clerk Reso No. 118-19, Adopted 11/19/19, Item No. 4.3 Page 2 of 2 7.1.b Packet Pg. 408 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 8 - 1 9 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) 7.1.b Packet Pg. 409 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 8 - 1 9 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) 7.1.b Packet Pg. 410 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 8 - 1 9 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) 7.1.b Packet Pg. 411 At t a c h m e n t : 2 . R e s o l u t i o n N o . 1 1 8 - 1 9 ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) Vehicle Route Arnold Rd Altamirano Ave Campus Dr Martinelli Way 7.1.c Packet Pg. 412 At t a c h m e n t : 3 . S A V T e s t i n g R o u t e ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) Signs Localization Signs Advance & Warning Signs 7.1.d Packet Pg. 413 At t a c h m e n t : 4 . S A V S i g n s ( S h a r e d A u t o n o m o u s V e h i c l e T e s t i n g - P r o j e c t U p d a t e ) Page 1 of 4 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 18, 2020 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Informational Report on Sixth Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation and Housing Element Update Prepared by: Kristie Wheeler, Assistant Community Development Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive information about the upcoming sixth cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and Housing Element Update. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. DESCRIPTION: Background Since 1969, the State has mandated that all California cities and counties plan for their share of the region’s housing needs at all income levels. Every eight years, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) determines the share of the state’s housing need for each region based on population projections prepared by the California Department of Finance. Councils of government s then distribute a share of a region’s housing need to each city and county within the region. In the Bay Area, that group is called the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). This is known as the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process. While state law does not require an agency to build the housing units assigned through the RHNA process, it does require that land use planning regulations accommodate the units. Each city and county must then update the Housing Element of its General Plan to provide locations where housing can be built and the goals and policies necessary to meet the community’s housing needs. The “No Net Loss” laws ensure that local governments do not downzone these “opportunity sites” after their Housing Element has been certified. Each jurisdiction must also submit an annual report to HCD to 8.1 Packet Pg. 414 Page 2 of 4 demonstrate progress toward meeting the goals and policies of the Housing Element. Table 1, below, shows the City of Dublin’s RHNA for the last three cycles. Table 1: Regional Housing Need Allocation (from the Adopted Housing Elements) 1999-2006 2007-2014 2015-2023 Income Level # Units % of Total # Units % of Total # Units % of Total Extremely Low/Very Low 796 15% 1,092 32.8% 796 34.8% Low 531 9% 661 19.8% 446 19.5% Moderate 1,441 26% 653 19.6% 425 18.6% Above Moderate 2,668 50% 924 27.7% 618 27% Total 5,436 100% 3,330 100% 2,285 100% Following the last RHNA process, the City updated the Housing Element and demonstrated how the RHNA could be achieved through a combination of approved projects and planned residential units. The City Council adopted the 2015 - 2023 General Plan Housing Element on November 18, 2014, and HCD certified that the updated Housing Element was compliant with State law. The City’s on-going implementation and annual reporting over th e past five years have also met with HCD approval. Staff is currently preparing the Annual Progress Report for 2019 and will provide it to the City Council for review and approval at an upcoming City Council meeting. Regional Housing Needs Allocation ABAG kicked off the sixth RHNA cycle with the formation of a Housing Methodology Committee, which began meeting in October 2019. The Methodology Committee is comprised of nine elected officials (one from each Bay Area county), 12 housing or planning staff members (at least one from each county), 13 regional stakeholders representing diverse perspectives, and one partner from state government. The goals of the Housing Methodology Committee are as follows: • Advise ABAG staff on the RHNA allocation methodology for the RHNA cycle. • Ensure the methodology and resulting allocation meet statutory requirements. • Ensure the methodology and resulting allocation are consistent with the forecasted development pattern included in Plan Bay Area 2050. Staff anticipates that preparation of the City’s Housing Element Update for the sixth RHNA cycle will be more challenging than the last given the following: • Higher expected total regional housing need. • New requirements for identifying eligible sites in Housing Elements. • More factors to consider in allocations (i.e., overpayment of rent/mortgage, overcrowding in residential unit, greenhouse gas emissions, jobs-housing fit). • Expanded HCD oversight on methodology and allocations. 8.1 Packet Pg. 415 Page 3 of 4 • Greater emphasis on social equity. Of particular concern is the higher expected total regional housing need, which ABAG has indicated is due in part to prior RHNA cycles where the total of number units assigned has gotten progressively smaller while the need for housing has increased. Although the region often meets the needs for market-rate units, the region has consistently struggled to meet the goals for affordable units. Table 2 below shows the decline in the number of units assigned for the region over the last three RHNA cycles and progress toward meeting the RHNA. Table 2: Bay Area RHNA Progress 1999-2017 RHNA Permitted Percent of RHNA Permitted Cycle Assignment Total All Extremely Low/Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate 1999-2006 230,743 213,024 92% 44% 79% 38% 153% 2007-2014 214,500 123,098 57% 29% 26% 28% 99% 2015-2023 187,990 87,691 65% 15% 25% 25% 125% For example, in southern California, HCD recently assigned 1.34 million new housing units through the RHNA process to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) compared to 412,137 units during the prior RHNA cycle. This represents an additional 932,603 units and a more than threefold increase over the prior RHNA cycle. Although SCAG filed a formal objection, HCD did not alter SCAG’s RHNA. Using that metric, a similar increase in the Bay Area RHNA could result in a 6,855-unit allocation for Dublin. The requirements for identifying eligible sites in the Housing Element is also an area of concern. Over the past three years, there has been additional scrutiny on sites identified in the Housing Element to meet the City’s RHNA. For example, HCD has indicated that sites smaller than 0.5 acres and larger than 10 acres will require supportive analysis to document the viability of a site for housing , and sites identified in the current Housing Element cannot be reused unless rezoned to allow by-right development. Thus, Staff anticipates that the City will need to rezone vacant and underutilized sites, and potentially commercial sites, to be able to accommodate our RHNA. As shown in Table 3 below, ABAG expects that HCD will issue the Regional Housing Need Determination (RHND) for the nine-county Bay Area in April 2020. Between May and September 2020, ABAG will release the proposed methodology (i.e., how the RHND will be allocated to cities and counties), hold public hearings, and submit the draft methodology to HCD for review and approval. In January 2021, the final methodology should be adopted and ABAG will release the draft RHNA to jurisdictions. Appeals can be submitted until March 2021, and decisions on appeals and the final RHNA will be issued by May 2021. The City will then have until December 2022 to adopt a Housing Element Update. 8.1 Packet Pg. 416 Page 4 of 4 Table 3: Key Milestones Key Milestones Date 1 HCD issues Regional Housing Need Determination (RHDA) for the Bay Area April 2020 2 ABAG releases proposed RHNA methodology May 2020 3 Public hearings on proposed RHNA methodology June 2020 4 ABAG releases draft RHNA methodology and submits to HCD for review September 2020 5 Final RHNA methodology adopted and draft RHNA released to jurisdictions January 2021 6 Deadline for appeals March 2021 7 Decision on appeals and final RHNA issued to jurisdiction May 2021 8 Deadline to adopt Housing Element Update December 2022 Preparing for Housing Element Update Senate Bill 2 established a permanent source of funding intended to increase affordable housing stock in California and directed HCD to use 50 percent of the revenue in the first year to establish a program that provides financial and tech nical assistance to local governments to update planning documents and zoning ordinances to streamline housing production. On October 15, 2019, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the submittal of an application for Senate Bill (SB) 2 grant funds. On January 16, 2020, HCD approved the City’s SB 2 grant application totaling $310,000. The grant includes $55,000 to prepare an analysis of vacant and underutilized sites that could be used to accommodate the next RHNA allocation. Staff will begin the site analysis described above later this year and develop a scope of work for the Housing Element Update. Staff anticipates the need to supplement staff resources with consultants to assist with preparation of the Housing Element Update and will be returning to the City Council later this year to select a consultant to begin this process. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. 8.1 Packet Pg. 417