No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 7.2 Arroyo Vista Legis Action Attch 2 Exhibit D (3)~'~-I~' ~' ~~5 Appendix 8.6 Acoustic Analysis Arroyo Vista Project PA 07-028 Page 185 Draft Environmental Impact Report January 2009 City of Dublin Tel.' 707-766-7700 www, illingworthrodkin.com Fax: 707-766-7790 illro@illingworthrodkin. com January 28, 2008 Stephen Christensen Citation Homes 404 Saratoga Avenue, Suite 100 Santa Clara, CA 95050 VIA E-Mail: schristensen~fi)scsdevclonment com SUBJECT: Arroyo Vista Residential Project, Dublin, California - Environmental Noise Assessment Dear Stephen: This letter presents the results of our environmental noise assessment of the Arroyo Vista Residential Project proposed west of Dougherty Road in Dublin, California. The project would redevelop the site with high-density residential uses. Included in the report are the fundamentals of environmental acoustics, applicable noise regulations and guidelines, and a description of existing noise levels at the project site. The report summarizes the results of calculations of future noise levels at proposed noise sensitive receptors and presents the noise and land use compatibility assessment of the proposed project. Preliminary recommendations are made to ensure a compatible residential development. Fundamentals of Acoustics Noise may be defined as unwanted sound. Noise is usually objectionable because it is disturbing or annoying. The objectionable nature of sound could be caused by its pitch or its loudness. Pitch is the height or depth of a tone or sound, depending on the relative rapidity (frequency) of the vibrations by which it is produced. Higher pitched signals sound Iouder to humans than sounds with a lower pitch. Loudness is intensity of sound waves combined with the reception characteristics of the ear. Intensity may be compared with the height of an ocean wave in that it is a measure of the amplitude of the sound wave. In addition to the concepts of pitch and loudness, there are several noise measurement scales which are used to describe noise in a particular location. A decibel (dB) is a unit of measurement which indicates the relative amplitude of a sound. The zero on the decibel scale is based on the lowest sound level that the healthy, unimpaired human ear can detect. Sound levels in decibels are calculated on a logarithmic basis. An increase of 10 decibels represents aten-fold increase in ILLJNGWORTH 8r RODrvN, INC. lJ/1 Acoustics • Air Quality llll'' 505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petaluma, California 94952 Stephen Christensen January 28, 2008 Page 2 of 15 acoustic energy, while 20 decibels is 100 times more intense, 30 decibels is 1,000 times more intense, etc. There is a relationship between the subjective noisiness or loudness of a sound and its intensity. Each ]0-decibel increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness over a fairly wide range of intensities. Technical terms are defined in Table 1. There are several methods of characterizing sound. The most common in California is the A- weighted sound level or dBA. This scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive. Representative outdoor and indoor noise levels in units of dBA are shown in Table 2. Because sound levels can vazy markedly over a short period of time, a method for describing either the average character of the sound or the statistical behavior of the variations must be utilized. Most commonly, environmental sounds are described in terms of an average level that has the same acoustical energy as the summation of all the time-varying events. This energy-equivalent sound/noise descriptor is called Leq. The most common averaging period is hourly, but Leq can describe any series of noise events of arbitrary duration. The scientific instrument used to measure noise is the sound level meter. Sound level meters can accurately measure environmental noise levels to within about plus or minus 1 dBA. Various computer models are used to predict environmental noise levels from sources, such as roadways and airports. The accuracy of the predicted models depends upon the distance the receptor is from the noise source. Close to the noise source, the models are accurate to within about plus or minus 1 to 2 dBA. Since the sensitivity to noise increases during the evening and at night -- because excessive noise interferes with the ability to sleep -- 24-hour descriptors have been developed that incorporate artificial noise penalties added to quiet-time noise events. The Community Noise Equivalent Level, CNEL, is a measure of the cumulative noise exposure in a community, with a 5 dB penalty added to evening (7:00 pm - 10:00 pm) and a 10 dB addition to nocturnal (10:00 pm - 7:00 am} noise levels. The Day/Night Average Sound Level, DNL, is essentially the same as CNEL, with the exception that the evening time period is dropped and all occurrences during this three-hour period are grouped into the daytime period. 55 I ~~' ~ 5 Stephen Christensen January 28, 2008 Page 3 of 15 TABLE 1 Definitinnc of 4rnnct:ral Tormc ifcod :.. +ti:~ ne....... Term Definitions Decibel, dB A unit describing the amplitude of sound, equal to 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the pressure of the sound measured to the reference pressure. The reference pressure for air is 20. Sound Pressure Level Sound pressure is the sound force per unit area, usually expressed in micro Pascals (or 20 micro Newtons per square meter), where 1 Pascal is the pressure resulting from a force of 1 Newton exerted over an area of 1 square meter. The sound pressure level is expressed in decibels as 20 times the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio between the pressures exerted by the sound to a reference sound pressure (e.g., 20 micro Pascals). Sound pressure level is the quantity that is directly measured by a sound level meter. Frequency, I-Iz The number of complete pressure fluctuations per second above and below atmospheric pressure. Normal human hearing is between 20 Hz and 20,000 Hz. Infrasonic sound aze below 20 Hz and Ultrasonic sounds are above 20,000 Hz. A-Weighted Sound The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A- Level, dBA weighting filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the frequency response of the human ear and correlates welt with subjective reactions to noise. Equivalent Noise Level, The average A-weighted noise level during the measurement period. The hourly Leq Leq used for this report is denoted as dBA Lr,tni. Community Noise The average A-weighted noise level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of Equivalent Level, 5 decibels in the evening from 7:00 pm to 10:00 pm and after addition of 10 decibels CNEL to sound levels in the night between 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. Day/Night Noise Level, The average A-weighted noise level during a 24-hour day, obtained afer addition of DNL Or L,,,, 10 decibels to levels measured in the night between 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. Ln Values The A-weighted noise levels that are exceeded 1 %, 10%, 50%, and 90% of the time 1wn, Liu, Lei, Lssi during the measurement period. Ambient Noise Level The composite of noise from all sources near and far. The nonnal or existing level of environmental noise at a given location. Intrusive That noise which intrudes over and above the existing ambient noise at a given location. The relative intrusiveness of a sound depends upon iu amplitude, duration, frequency, and time of occurrence and tonal or informational content as well as the prevailing ambient noise level. 55a ~ X 55 Stephen Christensen January 28, 2008 Page 4 of 15 TABLE 2 T ical Noise Levels in the lunv~ronment Common Outdoor poise Source ? \oise Level .Common Indoor Noise Source 120 dBA Jet fly-over at 300 meters Rock concert 110 dBA Pile driver at 20 meters 100 dBA Night club with live music 90 dBA Large truck pass by at 15 meters 80 dBA Noisy restaurant Garbage disposal at 1 meter Gas lawn mower at 30 meters 70 dBA Vacuum cleaner at 3 meters Commercial/Urban area daytime Normal speech at I meter Suburban expressway at 90 meters 60 dBA Suburban daytime Active office environment 50 dBA Urban area nighttime Quiet office environment 40 dBA Suburban nighttime Quiet rural areas 30 dBA Library Ouiet bedroom at ni¢ht Wilderness area 20 dBA Quiet recording studio Most quiet remote azeas to aaA Threshold of human hearing 0 dBA 55 3 ~~~ ~=~ ~ ~ Stephen Christensen January 28, 2008 Page 5 of ] 5 Regulatory Background HUD environmental noise regulations are set forth in 24CFR Part S 1B (Code of Federal Regulations). The following exterior noise standards for new housing construction would be applicable to this project. • 65 dBA La„ or less -acceptable. • exceeding 65 dBA La„ but not exceeding 75 dBA La„ -normally unacceptable (appropriate sound attenuation measures must provide an additional 5 decibels of attenuation over that typically provided by standard construction in the 65 dBA La„ to 70 dBA La„ zone; 10 decibels additional attenuation in the 70 dBA La„ to 75 dBA Lan zone) • exceeding 75 dBA La„ -unacceptable These noise standards apply, "... at a location 2 meters from the building housing noise sensitive activities in the direction of the predominant noise source..." and "...at other locations where it is determined that quiet outdoor space is required in an area ancillary to the principal use on the site." A goal of 45 dBA La„ is set forth for interior noise levels and attenuation requirements are geared toward achieving that goal. It is assumed that with standard construction any building will provide sufficient attenuation to achieve an interior level of 45 dBA La„ or less if the exterior level is 65 dBA La„ or less. The City of Dublin has adopted noise and land use compatibility guidelines for new residential projects. Residential development is considered compatible without mitigation up to a day/night average noise level (La„)2 of 60 dB. This standard is more restrictive than the HUD exterior noise standard and is applied in primary outdoor use areas associated with asingle-family development (backyards) and common outdoor use areas associated with multi-family projects. Multi-family housing in the State of California is subject to the environmental noise limits set forth in the 2007 California Building Code (Chapter 12, Appendix Section 1207.11.2). The noise limit is a maximum interior noise level of45 dBA La„. Where exterior noise levels exceed 60 dBA La„, a report must be submitted with the building plans describing the noise control measures that have been incorporated into the design of the project to meet the noise limit. This interior noise limit is consistent with the HUD guidelines. I City of Dublin General Plan, City of Dublin Community Development Department, Adopted February 11, 1985, Updated September 14, 2006. 2 Day/Night Noise Level, L,~. The average A-weighted noise level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of 10 decibels to levels measured in the night between 10:00 pm and 7;00 am. ~~~ ~ ~ ~5 Stephen Christensen January 28, 2008 Page 6 of 15 Existing Noise Environment The project site is located west of Dougherty Road, south of Amador Valley Road. Parks +~ Reserve Forces Training Area is located east of Dougherty Road. The site is currently developed with residential land uses that will be replaced with the project. A 7-foot noise barrier is located at the property line of the project site to reduce noise levels generated by traffic along Dougherty Road. Ambient noise levels, resulting primarily from traffic, were measured at the project site sr from midday 7uly 17, 2007 to the afternoon of July 19, 2007. The noise monitoring survey consisted of one long-term noise measurement (LT-1) and two short-term, attended noise °~` measurements (ST-1 and ST-2). Noise measurement locations are shown on Figure 1. The long-term noise measurement was made approximately 50 feet from the centerline of Dougherty Road at an elevation approximately 12 feet above the ground. This measurement location was not shielded by the existing noise barrier and quantified the daily trend in noise levels during the approximate two-day measurement period. Daytime hourly average noise levels ranged from 70 to 75 dBA Leq, and nighttime hourly average noise levels ranged from 58 to 74 dBA Len. The day-night average noise level, calculated based on the measured noise data at this location, was 75 dBA Ld,,. Figures 2, 3, and 4 depict the daily trend in noise levels at the long-term noise measurement site. Two short-term noise measurements were made at positions five-feet above the ground to quantify noise levels at residential receivers that are shielded by the existing seven-foot noise barrier. Average noise levels generated by vehicular traffic were 56 to 58 dBA LeQ. The estimated Ldp at these locations is 59 to 61 dBA. Table 3 summarizes the short-term noise data. ~r. ui v ~ cunu~r_T'~uM NniCF. MFACi1RF,MENT SUMMARY lALLlI J - - -~ ~- Location --- -- Leq L(10) L(50) L(90) Ldn ST-1 - 65 ft. from the center of Dougherty 58 61 57 52 61 Road, microphone 5 ft. above the ground, shielded by existing 7 ft. noise barrier. ST-2 - 95 ft. from the center of Dougherty 56 59 55 51 59 Road, microphone 5 ft. above the ground, shielded by existing 7 ft. noise barrier. Parks Reserve Forces Training Area (Camp Parks) is also a source of noise that affects project site. The site is located within 1,000 feet of the westernmost boundary of Camp Parks and is subject to audible noise from helicopters. Helicopters are required to enter and exit Camp Parks from the north and east, and although audible, noise levels resulting from distant helicopters are generally at or below ambient traffic noise levels along Dougherty Road. Training activities at the small arms ranges, located approximately one-mile to the northeast, may also be audible and X55 ~ ~(>~ Stephen Christensen January 28, 2008 Page 7 of 15 annoying at times. The Environmental Noise Management Plan for Parks Reserve Forces Training Area' indicates that the project site is within the Suggested Noise Disclosure Area but the site is not subject to incompatible noise levels. Noise and Land Use Compatibility Assessment Exterior Noise Assessment The compatibility of proposed exterior use areas is assessed against HUD's environmental noise regulations (65 dBA Lan or less) and the Land Use Compatibility Standards established in the City of Dublin General Plan (60 dBA Lan or less). FHWA's Traffic Noise Model (TNM v. 2.5) was used in the noise analysis for this project. Roadway, barrier, terrain features, and receiver locations were digitized and input into the traffic noise model in athree-dimensional reference coordinate system. Geometrical inputs were based on the project's Conceptual Land Plan' and field observations. Traffic volumes, including the vehicle mix ratio, and traffic speeds were also input into the model for calibration based on field counts. TNM predicts noise levels assuming calm wind conditions with moderate temperatures and humidity. Future traffic projectionss were used to calculate the relative increase in traffic noise levels expected along Dougherty Road, adjacent to the project site, by 2025. Future traffic noise levels are anticipated to be about 2 dBA Lan higher than existing conditions. Exterior noise levels would be as high as 77 dBA Lan at the easternmost property line of the project site. Future noise levels in private/common exterior use areas were calculated assuming the attenuation provided by a noise barrier at the easternmost property line of the project site and the shielding provided by the proposed residential units, assumed to be two-stories high. Calculations were made for receivers located between proposed buildings and for receivers proposed near access roads that would receive less shielding (Figure 5). Traffic noise modeling results are summarized in Table 4. 3 Environmental Noise Management Plan, Parks Reserve Forces Training Area, California, U. S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine, December 2000. 4 Arroyo Vista Conceptual Land Plan, Carlson, Barbee, & Gibson, Inc., June 20, 2007. 5 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development, Figures 3 and 9, TJKM, December 19, 2007. 55~ °~ ~~s Stephen Christensen January 28,2008 Page 8 of 15 .r ..~. r. • ern ~ ~~m ntnictti M(lilFi .iN(: RF.CTii ,TS (dRA. La..l 1HDLt.Y- 11~[lrrat. i.va~a Receiver .1 ,...~....~.~..~. _~~_ 7-foot ___ ___-, _ B-foot 9-foot 1st Row -Between Buildin s 63 61 60 2nd Row- Between Buildin s 61 61 60 3rd Row-Between Buildin s 59 58 58 4th Row -Between Buildin s 5th Row -Between Buildin s 57 56 56 55 56 54 1st Row-Near Access Road 71 71 71 3rd Row -Near Access Road 67 67 66 5th Row -Near Access Road 62 62 62 As shown in Table 4, the existing 7-foot noise barrier (relative to the elevation of Dougherty Road) would reduce exterior noise levels to 63 dBA Ld„ at first-row exterior use areas proposed between the residential units themselves. Exterior noise levels would be 61 dBA Ld„ at second- row exterior use areas and less than 60 dBA Ld„ at third-row through fifth-row exterior use areas located between the residential units. The existing noise barrier would provide sufficient attenuation such that exterior noise levels between building rows would be less than 65 dBA La„ meeting HUD's exterior noise standards for new housing. Larger noise barriers would be necessary to meet the City of Dublin's exterior noise level guidelines. An 8-foot noise barrier would reduce exterior noise levels at first- and second-row exterior use areas (between building rows) to 61 dBA Ld„ and to less than 60 dBA Ld„ at third- row through fifth-row exterior use areas. A 9-foot barrier would be required to reduce exterior noise levels to 60 dBA Ld„ or less at all residential use areas located between building rows (first-row through fifth-row exterior use areas). Exterior noise levels at receivers adjacent to the access roadways would receive minimal shielding from noise barriers. Exterior noise levels would range from 62 dBA Ld„ to 71 dBA La„ at first- through fifth-row receivers adjacent to an access roadway from Dougherty Road with the existing 7-foot noise barrier. Recommendation: As the site plan develops, continue to locate private or common exterior use areas away from Dougherty Road in areas shielded by proposed residential buildings. The project applicant and the City should agree on an acceptable exterior noise Level and design noise barriers accordingly to meet the agreed upon level. The existing 7-foot noise barrier would reduce exterior noise levels to less than 65 dBA Ld„, consistent with HUD guidelines and within the conditionally acceptable noise level range identified by the City of Dublin. A 9-foot barrier would be required to reduce exterior noise levels to 60 dBA Ld„ or less (normally acceptable range identified by the City of Dublin). Final detailed design of proposed noise barriers should be completed when the project site plan and grading plan are available. Noise generated by Camp Parks should also be disclosed to prospective homeowners/occupants in the property deed or lease agreement. 55l af- ~i55 Stephen Christensen January 28, 2008 Page 9 of I S /nterior Noise Assessment The easternmost facades of proposed first-row units would be exposed to future exterior noise levels of about 76-77 dBA Ldp assuming amulti-story residential building with and uninterrupted view of Dougherty Road. Exterior noise levels at residential facades of second-row through fifth-row units would be lower assuming increased distance from the roadway and the shielding provided by adjoining buildings. Exterior noise levels would range from 62 to 73 dBA L~, at second-row through fifth-row units. Interior noise levels with the windows partially open for ventilation are approximately 15 decibels lower than exterior noise levels assuming typical California construction methods. With the incorporation of mechanical ventilation systems that allow occupants the option of maintaining the windows shut to control noise, interior noise levels are normally 20 to 25 decibels lower than exterior noise levels. Interior noise levels would be approximately 52 to 57 dBA Ldn inside residential units assuming the windows are closed. Interior noise levels would vary depending on the specific design of the buildings (relative window area to wall area) and construction materials and methods. Since project-level recommendations cannot be made without building elevation and floor plans, an acoustical analysis should be prepared during detailed design of the project. Attaining the necessary noise reduction from exterior to interior spaces is readily achievable in noise environments less than 75 dBA Lai with proper wall construction techniques, the selections of proper windows and doors, and the incorporation offorced-air mechanical ventilation systems. In noise environments exceeding 75 dBA Ld,,, the construction materials and techniques necessary to reduce interior noise levels to acceptable levels become more expensive and difficult to implement. Noise insulation features such asstucco-sided staggered-stud walls and high STC-rated windows and doors would be required for first-row receivers adjacent to Dougherty Road. First-row residences would also need to be equipped with a full heating and air-conditioning system because it is unlikely residents would open their windows for ventilation. A minimum of 32 decibels of attenuation would be required to meet the 45 dBA Lai interior noise level guideline at units nearest Dougherty Road. Recommendation: Noise insulation features to be included in the project's design will need to be developed once detailed floor plans and building elevations are available. The noise control treatments should be designed to reduce interior noise levels to 45 dBA Lai or less to meet the interior noise limits established by HUD and the State Building Code. Special building construction techniques (e.g., sound-rated windows and building facade treatments) will be required for new residential uses adjacent to Dougherty Road. These treatments would include, but are not limited to, sound rated windows and doors, sound rated wall constructions, acoustical caulking, etc. The specific determination of what treatments are necessary will be conducted on a unit-by-unit basis. Results of the analysis, including the description of the necessary noise control treatments, will be submitted along with the building plans and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 55~ ~~ X55 ~` Stephen Christensen January 28, 2008 Page ]0 of 15 This concludes our environmental noise assessment. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, Michael S. Thill ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. (07-131) f ~~„ ~ Jr .~- A'y~.~--.~=.-s---~-""wr+.-~IY~ sr s+w..'~i""'s L.. ~r s~.~ 2„ ~ ~i'~.,w,~.. _c ~ ~ ~ ..:. 7. _ ~..,~ ~ '~_r "~ 1,,,,74. t""w~.*` ~ aq-r:'ICLLx ~, i _ ,,,,- y~s'_~ *~" ,.>~ may-, `Y ~: z :, .. w. ~ < /' Kam, ~ ~ ~ j ..:3'r";,~ C~ ~'Mr'~+i^iij ~L~~ . ~ .. " - w,~, ~.. r .. •. ` ~ ._ _ ._- _.. . ___.. \A..ncnr..mwnt iACa2tOAS \oise Le~Tels at LT-1 ^•50 feet from the Center of Dougheric~ Road Tuesdaf, July 17, 2007 5~1 ~f X155 Noise Levels at LT-1 ~Sd feet from the Ceoter of Dougherh~ Road «eduesdav, Jnh 18, 2407 90 es f? C ~5 is ~ ~L 50 v c~ .~ Z `D a~ ao ss ___ .. - ..--. - _._ }a 1 1 I I F-rl I h--,-r--r-1 I H I I f 1 1 I I I c:oo zoo ~:oo r 1L U A 1 G N~ O R T H~ R U D Kl N l a 1~ C. 'fIJJAcoustics ~ Air Qualitylltlf' +zoo s:oo ia:ao r2:ao ra:o-o is:oo ,e:ao zo:ao zz:ao Hour Begioniag • Leq -e- L(i aj -~-- Lf50; - -_ Lf90; 75 dBA Ldn Figure 3 5ha ~f- X55 Noise Levels at LT-1 ~50 feet from the Center of Doughert<~ Road Thursday, July 19, 20D7 ~~ es eo 35 "a u 50 ~ 50 4. V~ 'SC :a o:ao z:ao a:oo ~LLINGW4RTH~rAiODKIN~IA1~ rlNl Aooustics • Air Quality 1~N' s:oc s:ao 1a:oa 1z:aa 1e:ao 1e:oo 16:00 zo:ac zz:oa Hour Beginning • LEq -~ Lf1} -G- L(10; --~- L(50 ~._ L(~r Fignre 4 5~3 a~ ~t55 Figure 5 -Sample \oise Modeling Recewers and,\oise^Leveis Assam~na 7-E'ot>t Barrier _.._. __. _.,_ _ -- _ _ __ _._..r _w. ~...._ r ~. --~' _ ~, _ ~7Ldn ~ _. _. _~~ __ . 161 Ldn _ ~- _~~_ --- ______ __ ~.~ 6~ Ldn _~ ,,_~ ~,.~> _ j Ro~~ 56€~dnv~~. 7-foot farrier ~.~ Ro~~w ~ _~ v~ _ _, . _....,. _.~. _~Ta Row 59 Ldn. ~~ ~ . fi7 Ldn ~"~ Rom ~ - __ , _ -- .,. 15~ Ro~~ 63 Ldn ®_ ~ ~ t Lcn _. 7-foot farrier ., ~:. - . .~ s _ :.+. _ . _. t~ ~~ EP ti ~.. ~.-~~i~r~i.~~ 5~`I ~ X155 From: "Erica Fraser" <Erica.FraserCci.dublin.ca.us> Subject; Cost of Project Date: January 30, 2008 5:52:55 PM GMT To: "Jerry Haag" <jphaag@pacbell.neb Jerry - This is Eden's estimate of building the affordable project. Let me know if you need anything else. The estimated total cost of the Arroyo Vista Affordable Apartments is $56,995,000. The total includes approximately $41,030,000 for the Affordable Family Apartments and approximately $15,965,000 for the Affordable Senior Apartments. The sources of funding for the Affordable Family Apartments would most likely include the City of Dublin, the Dublin Housing Authority from Citation Homes Central's site purchase, Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Investor, Affordable ~"" Housing Program (AHP) funding from the Federal Home Loan Bank and a permanent bank loan. The sources of funding for the Affordable Senior Apartments would most likely include the same sources except that HUD Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly Program would be included and there would be no permanent bank loan. „- Erica Fraser, AICP Senior Planner City of Dublin 925-833-6610 . 5(~5 o f - X155 Appendix 8.7 Traffic Impact Analysis Arroyo Vista Project PA 07-028 Page 186 Draft Environmental Impact Report January 2009 City of Dublin TJ KM Transportation Consultants Vision That Moves Your Community Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development In the City of Dublin January 7, 2009 Pleasanton Fresno Sacramento Santa Rosa vrww.tjkm.com S(~~ ~ ~;:~ ~ ~ Sb1 ~ X155 TJKM Transportation Consultants Vision That Moves Your Community Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development In the City of Dublin January 7, 2009 www.tjkm.com Prepared by: TJKM Transportation Consultants 3875 Hopyard Road Suite 200 Pleasanton, CA 94588-8526 Tel: 925.463.06 I I Fax: 925.463.3690 J:\Jurisdict-on\D\Dublin\157-001 On-calATask 115- Arroyo Housing Development\Report\R O10709.docx 5~8 ~f G55 TJKM T ansportation Consultants Table of Contents Introduction and Summary .................................................................. ............................... I I Introduction .................................................................................................................. ....................................... I Summa ......................... ry ............................................................................................... ....................................... . """ """"""""""""~~~~~~~ 5 . . . . . Analysis Methodolo .......... .......... ~ ............................... ... . .. ......... ............................. ........ Study Intersections Study Arterial and Freeway Mainline Segments ................................................... ........5 ............................... ..................5 Study Scenarios .................................... ....................................................... ...................... 6 Level of Service Analysis Methodologies and Parameters ................................ ........................................ ..........6 ', Signalized Intersections ........................................................................................ .............................. ..........6 Unsignalized Intersections ................................................................................... .............................. ......7 Dublin Traffic Model .................................................................................................. .................................. 7 Dublin Traffic Model Calibration ............................................................................ ........................................ 7 City of Dublin General Plan and Tri Valley Transportation Action Plan Requirements ................... Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) Analysis .................................................... 7 MTS Roadway Segments ...................................................................................... ........................................8 ......8 Peak Hour Factor Assumptions .............................................................................. .................................. .....8 Significant Impact Criteria ....................................................................................... .................................... .......8 City of Dublin Intersections ............................................................................... .................................. ..8 City of Pleasanton Intersections ....................................................................... ....................................... 9 Routes of Regional Significance ......................................................................... ......................................... 9 CMA (Arterial and Freeway Segments) .......................................................... ......................................... ................9 Public Transit ......................................................................................................... ......................... ..........9 .................................................................................................... Traffic Safety ...... ............................... ....................................9 Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation ..............................:.................................... ..... i Existing Conditions .............................................................................. ............................... I 0 Existing Roadway Network .................................................................................... .......................................10 I I ' Existing Transit Service .....................:................:.................................................... ........................................ I I Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (Wheels) ............................. ........................................ I I .DART ..................................................................................................................... : ........................................ ................. 12 ...................... BART ............................................................................................... ....................... 12 ACE Commuter Train ........................................................................................ ........................................ 12 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation ....................................................... ........................................ 13 Existing Traffic Volumes and Lane Geometry ................................................... ........................................ Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Existing Conditions ........................ ........................................16 Project Characteristics ....................................................................... ................................ 17 Project Description ................................................................................................ .........................................17 .....17 Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................ .................................... 18 Trip Distribution and Assignment ....................................................................... ......................................... 18 ........................................................................ Project Site Access Assumptions """""""""" ..................... Existing plus Project Conditions ........................................................ ................................21 Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Existing plus Project Conditions .........................................21 Short Term Cumulative (2015) Conditions .....................................................................24 Dublin Traffic Model (2015) Assumptions ........................................................ .........................................24 Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Short Term Cumulative Conditions ..................................28 5e`~ `~ ~ 55 T JKM Transportation Consultants Short Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions ............................................................30 Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Short Term Cumulativ l P C e p us roject onditions...........30 Long Term Cumulative Conditions ,, ............... , , , ,, •...•••~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' 33 Dublin Traffic Model (2025) Assumptions .. , ........ _ ..... „ , ,,, , ,,,, , , , ,, , , ,,,, ..... ...............................33 Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Long Term Cumulativ C di i e on t ons ...................................36 Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions .............................................................38 Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions............38 Alameda County CMP Land Use Analysis Program .......................................................42 MTS Arterial Impacts ....................... ~ ...............................................................................................................42 Freeway/State Highway Impacts ............ } .......................................................................................................44 Transit System Impacts .................... ................. .............47 BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) ........... ... ................................................................................................. 4 7 LAVTA (Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority) -- Wheels ..................................................48 ACE (Altamont Commuter Express) Train ..........................................................................................48 On site Bus Circulation Options i .......... """' ...................................................................................................48 ' Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation Impacts ~` ...............................................................................................52 Project Site Circulation, Parking, and Access Review .............................. 53 ~~~ ...................... Parking Review ................. u ............................................................................................................................53 Access Review .... ..........................................................................................................................................53 Project Site Circulation . ......... ................................... ..................................................................................54 Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation ~,R ..........................................................................................................54 .Q. Supplementary Analysis ..................................................................................................... 55 Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions .~ ` (Alternate Camp Parks Access) ....................................................................................................................55 ,:: Study Participants ...............................................................................................................59 ,. TJKM Personnel ................................................................................................................................................59 Persons Contacted .r~- ........................................................................................................................................ 59 References .........................................................................................................................................................59 List of Appendices ,~ Appendix A -Level of Service Methodology i Appendix B -Existing Conditions Traffic Count Sheets Appendix C -Level of Service Worksheets: Existing Conditions •~ Appendix D -Project Trip Generation Calculation Spreadsheets Appendix E -Level of Service Worksheets: Existing plus Project Conditions Appendix F -Traffic Analysis ZonesAppendix G -Level of Service Worksheets: Short Term Cumulative Conditions Appendix G -Level of Service Worksheets: Short Term Cumulative Conditions ~' Appendix H -Level of Service Worksheets: Short Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions ,,,~ Appendix I -Level of Service Worksheets: Long Term Cumulative Conditions Appendix J -Level of Service Worksheets: Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions ' Appendix K -Level of Service Worksheets: Long Term Cumulative Conditions -Supplementary ,~ Analysis for Alternate Camp Parks Access ~~ 0 ~~: 5~0 ~ X55 TJKNi Transportation Consultants List of Figures Figure I: Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................................................3 Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan ............................................................................................................................... ..4 Figure 3: Existing Conditions Turning Movement Volumes ........................................................................ 14 Figure 4: Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls ...................................................................... 15 Figure 5: Net Project Trip Distribution Assumptions (A.M. Peak Hour) ................................................ 19 Figure 6: Net Project Trip Distribution Assumptions (P.M. Peak Hour) ................................................. 20 Figure 7: Existing plus Project Conditions Turning Movement Volumes ................................................. 22 Figure 8: Short Term Cumulative (2015) Conditions Turning Movement Volumes ............................ 26 Figure 9: Short Term Cumulative (2015) Conditions Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls..... 27 Figure 10: Short Term Cumulative (2015) plus Project Conditions Turning Movement Volumes... 32 Figure I I: Long Term Cumulative (2025) Conditions Turning Movement Volumes ........................... 34 Figure 12: Long Term Cumulative (2025) Conditions Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls.... 35 Figure 13: Long Term Cumulative (2025) plus Project Conditions Turning Movement Volumes.... 40 Figure 14: Bus Circulation Options ................................................................................................................... 49 Figure 15: Long Term Cumulative (2025) plus Project Conditions -Alternate Camp Parks Access Turning Movement Volumes ........................................................................................................ 57 Figure 16: Long Term Cumulative (2025) plus Project Conditions -Alternate Camp Parks Access Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls ................................................................................. 58 List of Tables Table I: Study Arterial and Freeway Segment Locations ...............................................................................6 Table II: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Existing Conditions ............................................... 16 Table III: Project Trip Generation ..................................................................................................................... 17 Table IV: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Existing plus Project Conditions ....................... 23 Table V: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Short Term Cumulative Conditions ................ 29 Table VI: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Short Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 I Table VII: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Long Term Cumulative Conditions ............... 37 Table VIII: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 I Table IX: Year 2015 and Year 2030 PM Peak Hour MTS Arterial Levels of Service ............................ 43 Table X: Short Term Cumulative (2015) Conditions Freeway Analysis .................................................. 45 Table XI: Long Term Cumulative (2030) Conditions Freeway Analysis .........................:........................ 46 Table XII: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions (Alternate Camp Parks Access) ........................................................................................... 56 5~ i D~- a5s ~ i<! i ranspor'u~tiar rOflSUlt~rltS Introduction and Summary Introduction This report presents the results of TJKM's traffic impact study for the proposed Arroyo Vista Housing Development in the City of Dublin. The project site is bounded by Dougherty Road to the east, Alamo Creek to the west, Amador Valley Boulevard to the north, and Iron Horse Trail to the south. The project vicinity is shown on Figure 1. The proposed development consists of three types of housing: 50 affordable senior units, 130 affordable family units, and 198 for sale units. The development will replace 150 units of public housing on a 23.8-acre site. The development will also include a Community Building and a Child Care Center. Primary vehicle access will occur from three reconfigured roadways located on Dougherty Road. The existing N. Mariposa Drive will be eliminated with the project. The proposed project site plan is shown in Figure 2. The purpose of this traffic study is to evaluate traffic impacts, identify short-term and long-term roadway and circulation needs, determine potential mitigation measures, and identify any critical traffic issues that should be addressed in the on-going planning process. The study primarily focused on evaluating conditions at ten existing intersections and four project driveway intersections that may potentially be impacted by the proposed project. The intersection operating conditions were evaluated under six traffic scenarios that are listed in a subsequent section of this report. The analysis assumes that by Year 2025, Camp Parks access will be relocated from Dublin Boulevard to Dougherty Road opposite Amador Valley Boulevard. A supplementary analysis was conducted to assess the impact of the possible relocation of the Camp. Parks access onto Dougherty Road opposite the main project access at S. Mariposa Drive. For the purpose of this study, it was assumed that the future Central Parkway extension would connect with Dougherty Road north of where Scarlett Drive intersects Dougherty Road. Summary ' Under existing conditions, all 10 of the signalized study intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service following the completion of the current construction project to improve Dougherty Road between I-580 and Houston Place. Two of the four unsignalized study intersections at the existing Arroyo Vista development experience levels of service E or F at the stop signs on the side streets. They include Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive and Dougherty Road/ S. Mariposa Drive. The proposed development will add a net of 83 a.m. peak hour trips and 110 p.m. peak hour trips to the street system. Under existing plus project conditions, all 10 signalized study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. With the reconfigured driveway system for the new project, the intersection of Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive will require signalization to mitigate unacceptable side-street delay. Short term cumulative impacts were examined with the use of the 2015 scenario of the Dublin Traffic Model (DTM). In this scenario, only one signalized study intersection, Dougherty Road at Amador Valley Boulevard, has unacceptable levels of service. Three of the four unsignalized study Page 1 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 5~a °~. X55 Til`-.~` ransr:o ~~ior ~c,^~sui~ants intersections at the existing Arroyo Vista site would experience unacceptable levels of service (excessive delays to motorists on the side streets) without the proposed project. Under short term cumulative conditions plus the proposed project, the project would exacerbate unacceptable conditions at Dougherty Road and Amador Valley Boulevard. Although the City has an identified Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project to widen Dougherty Road, it will not be complete by 2015. Thus, the project impact is significant and can be mitigated by the Project applicant making a fair share payment toward the future improvements. In this same scenario, a new traffic signal will be required to serve the new project at the intersection of Dougherty Road and S. Mariposa to mitigate unacceptable side-street delay. Long term cumulative impacts were examined with the use of the 2025 scenario of the DTM, which represents build out of the Dublin General Plan. Without the proposed project, level of service ~,,. deficiencies would exist at two intersections, Dougherty Road at Amador Valley Boulevard and Dougherty Road at Dublin Boulevard. A supplemental analysis at the end of this report shows that without the Camp Parks access opposite Amador Valley Boulevard, this intersection would operate ~, acceptably under long-term cumulative conditions. The intersection of Dublin Boulevard and ' Dougherty Road will operate unacceptably and no improvements, beyond those currently being constructed, are feasible. As in the previous cumulative scenario, three of the four existing unsignalized intersections serving the existing Arroyo Vista site would experience unacceptable levels of service (excessive delays to motorists on the side streets) without the proposed project. ~: Project traffic is comparatively minor, so only the same intersections would continue to operate unacceptably with the addition of project traffic to long term cumulative traffic. The addition of project traffic at Dougherty Road and Amador Valley Boulevard would exacerbate unacceptable conditions. This potential impact would remain significant and unavoidable because the City will not have the authority to require the Army to construct improvements at this intersection. Since ` the project contributes some traffic to the already impacted intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Dougherty Road, this results in a significant and unavoidable impact. The City will need to continuously monitor this intersection in the future and implement any available transportation '' measures to reduce traffic. In addition, a new signal will be required to serve the project traffic on Dougherty Road at S. Mariposa to mitigate unacceptable side-street delay. Arterials and freeways were analyzed to satisfy the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency requirements. No project impacts were identified. The project creates no significant impacts for BART or the Altamont Commute Express, but does require some rerouting of Wheels buses due to a changed street pattern. Various rerouting options are presented that can be selected in the future to mitigate this impact. An analysis of bicycle and pedestrian impacts and a review of on-site circulation, parking and access were conducted. On site circulation needs to be modified somewhat, parking is adequate as proposed, and the previously described new traffic signal on Dougherty Road is required. The analysis also determined that the new entrance to Camp Parks could be placed either at Amador Valley Boulevard, requiring some additional mitigation at that intersection, or opposite the new signal at Arroyo Vista. If placed at the new signal, conditions would be acceptable. Poge 2 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Vicinity Map 5`l3 ~ cJ~ Figure I Project Site 1 11 ~~~o. y ~~P~~,~ 12 8TH ST. BRODER BLVD. Pia 13 P~ o,~ o GLEASON DR. fP o, 1 Q o ~ 7 D O ~ 2 o Z d } ~'. Z W ~ w ~' .. C9C ~~ ? ~~~ -'-----------------~----- CENTRAL PKWY. •1 ~ _ ~ . q~~ h ~ SIERRALN.~', SiERRA~a. 3 7 ~ DUBLIN BLVD. 8 4 m~ w vR~~rT a o HAaENo 5 ~ cRass~q cT. ~` 9 tic :1 JOHNSON DR. 6 OWENS DR. 10 LEGEND N O R T H Not to Scale • Study Intersection ~ Project Site Driveway ----Future Roadway -uu I - Y/YI VO - V I"I 5~~t °f X55 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Figure Proposed Site Plan ~ ,,~ ,, 'ICI i iIU iii ~_iu III}I \\ ~. ~a ~ _, ~'~ I .1 °4`3 ~1 / - -- ~ .::i VENTURADR. 1 5 5 .~ a 6 ~~ ~ '7. ~n - '~. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~' I --~ ~- _ i `~/1 ~ ~~~ ~~ i~; .~ F /// i~'v~ % ~~~ \~~ ~ S. MARIPOSA DR. S ~ ~, ~. <r n ~ ~~ ~ ~ :~: - - ~~ ~I ~ ~, ~ ~5 ~. ~; _ +((+ I .y, J ' ~ ~ ,, _~`~ ~~ - ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~; i '~ ;~, ~~ , .:,~~ ~~ - ry. "~ df ~ ~~ ~ ~ { h10NTEREY DR. 6~G~ rO - N O RT H No: 'co Scale '~ 1 157-001 - 5(2!08 - DM S~5 ~f- ~j55 -i~, anspo-a;iar wansuitan~s Analysis Methodology Study Intersections City staff selected the following intersections for analysis. The traffic analysis for the intersections is based on weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes. I. Dougherty Road / Amador Valley Boulevard (signalized) 2. Dougherty Road / Scarlett Drive (signalized) 3. Dougherty Road /Sierra Lane (signalized) 4. Dougherty Road /Dublin Boulevard (signalized) 5. Dougherty Road /Westbound I-580 off-ramp (signalized) 6. Hopyard Road /Eastbound I-580 off-ramp (signalized) 7. Dublin Boulevard / Scarlett Drive (signalized) 8. Hacienda Drive /Dublin Boulevard (signalized) 9. Hacienda Drive /Westbound I-580 off-ramp (signalized) 10. Hacienda Drive /Eastbound I-580 off-ramp (signalized) I I . Dougherty Road / Ventura Drive (unsignalized) 12. Dougherty Road / N. Mariposa Drive (unsignalized -will be eliminated with the project) 13. Dougherty Road / S. Mariposa Drive (unsignalized -will be signalized with the project) 14. Dougherty Road /Monterey Drive (unsignalized) Study Arterial and Freeway Mainline Segments City staff also selected the study arterial and freeway mainline segments shown in Table I. The roadway segments were selected based on the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) requirement for the analysis of Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) arterial and freeway facilities that may be impacted by the project. The CMA analysis is required since the proposed project is expected to generate more than 100 net new vehicle trips (CMA threshold) during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Study Scenarios The following six traffic scenarios were addressed in the traffic study: I . Existing Conditions -This scenario evaluates intersection conditions based on recent traffic counts and field surveys. 2. Existing plus Project Conditions -This scenario is similar to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of net project traffic. 3. Short Term Cumulative Conditions -This scenario evaluates intersection and roadway conditions based on 2015 traffic forecasts. 4. Short Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions -This scenario is similar to Short Term Cumulative Conditions, but with the addition of net project traffic. This scenario assumes that the entire proposed project will be completed by 2015. 5. Long Term Cumulative Conditions -This scenario evaluates intersection and roadway conditions based on 2025 traffic forecasts and assumes the development of the potential Camp Parks mixed-use project. 6. Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions -This scenario is similar to Long Term Cumulative Conditions, but with the addition of net project traffic. Page 5 Report - Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 Sib ~-f- ~t55 ~ ii -rar.soo; a.ior~ ti.;~asultarzts Table I: Study Arterial and Freeway Segment Locations Freewoys East of Fallon Road Between Tassajara Road and Fallon Road I-580 Between Hacienda Drive and Tassajara Road Between Dougherty Road and Hacienda Drive Between Dougherty Road and I-680 I-680 Alcosta Boulevard to I-580 South of I-580 SR-84 South of I-580 Arterials Between Hacienda Drive and Tassajara Road Dublin Boulevard Between Dougherty Road and Hacienda Drive Between Dougherty Road and Village Parkway Between I-580 and Dublin Boulevard Tassajara Road Between Dublin Boulevard and Gleason Drive North of Gleason Drive San Ramon Road Between I-580 and Amador Valley Boulevard Dougherty Road Between I-580 and Dublin Boulevard «„ Level of Service Analysis Methodologies and Parameters Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative description of intersection operations that uses an A through F letter rating system related to travel delay and congestion. LOS A indicates free flow conditions with little or no delay, while LOS F indicates jammed conditions with excessive delays and long back-ups. "'" !' Signalized Intersections '~` TJKM evaluated operating conditions at signalized study intersections using the Contra Costa ~° Transportation Authority Level of Service (CCTA LOS) Operations methodology contained in TRAFFIX software. Peak hour intersection conditions are reported as critical volume-to-capacity ' (v/c) ratios with corresponding LOS. Where appropriate, TJKM analyzed queuing with Synchro ,~ software. Appendix A contains a detailed description of the CCTA LOS methodology. Unsignalized .Intersections LOS at Unsignalized study intersections was evaluated using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) Unsignalized Intersections methodology. The method ranks level of service on an A through F scale similar to that used for signalized intersections, using average delay in seconds per vehicle for stopping movements as its measure of effectiveness. The HCM 2000 methodology is also described in Appendix A. ,,:: Page 6 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ~^' ~~~ ~~ X55 -,i E ranst,c. ~arar orsuizar~s Dublin Traffic Model The new Dublin Traffic Model (DTM) was used as the traffic analysis model. This model includes both Short Term Cumulative (2015) Conditions and General Plan Buildout or Long Term Cumulative (2025) Conditions, with 2015 reflecting a straight-line interpolation between 2004 and 2025 land use conditions. The use of 2015 is intended to approximate "approved development" conditions. The DTM was built on the CCTA model framework and its assumptions. The DTM is a refinement of the CCTA model and reflects the latest information on future land use projections and street networks in the City of Dublin. However, the CCTA Model is based on the regional San Francisco Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) travel demand model, with greater local detail in the area covering Contra Costa County and Tri-Valley. The CCTA Model serves as a valuable tool for transportation planning and traffic forecasting along the I-580 and I-680 transportation corridors. Local jurisdictions and congestion management agencies in Contra Costa and Alameda Counties have used this model extensively in preparing traffic impact studies and general plan updates. For example, the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (ACCMA) used the CCTA Model for the Tri-Valley Triangle Study in the cities of Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton. Dublin Traffic Model Calibration The DTM was calibrated to account for local project conditions prior to generating the future travel demand forecasts. A model calibration is a process that includes revisions of network attributes and adjustments of the model estimated demands to more closely match existing traffic counts. The model was calibrated to existing turning counts collected in the City of Dublin between 2002 and 2004. The model roadway network was modified to include all the future study intersections. Based on the City's collected counts, the a.m. and p.m. turning movement volumes were entered into the "existing condition" portion of the model. The calibration for the study area also included revising the network topology and attributes as well as the Origin-Destination (OD) demand. After the model was calibrated, the difference method was used to generate future link and turn volumes based on the calibrated existing volumes. City of Dublin General Plan and Tri Valley Transportation Action Plan Requirements The following arterials are Routes of Regional Significance (RRS) in the City of Dublin: Dublin Boulevard, Tassajara Road, San Ramon Road and Dougherty Road. The DTM was used to forecast traffic volumes for the traffic impact analysis of intersections along RRS. The levels or service for ` intersections along RRS were analyzed using the CCTA methodology for signalized intersections, and the 2000 HCM LOS methodology for unsignalized intersections. Additionally, the analysis of facilities along RRS was limited to intersection LOS analysis in this traffic report. This is because intersection performance measures are better indicators of LOS conditions along arterials than are segments between intersections. Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) Analysis The Alameda County Congestion Management Agency's (CMA) 2007 Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires analysis of Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) arterial, freeway, and transit facilities that are potentially impacted by the project. Since the proposed project is expected to generate more than 100 p.m. peak hour trips (net new), the 2007 CMP also requires a traffic impact analysis that includes use of the Alameda Countywide Transportation Demand Model for analyzing 2015 and 2030 traffic conditions. Consistent with CMP guidelines, the Alameda CMA analysis focuses on MTS roadway segments and transit corridors, but does not extend to intersections. The transit corridors in the project area Page 7 Report - Tral~ic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 5~8 ~ X155 -~~~~ V, ansecr~.a~ior~ ~~nsuicar~.s include Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) regional rail and Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) buses. MTS Roadway Segments TJKM evaluated potential impacts due to project traffic on Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) roadways. The MTS roadway system in the vicinity of the project includes I-580, I-680, SR-84, Dublin Boulevard, Tassajara Road, San Ramon Road and Dougherty Road. The study MTS roadway segments are included in Table I. The LOS for the designated MTS facilities were analyzed using the 1985 HCM LOS methodology as required by the CMA. The evaluation of the MTS roadway system was conducted to meet the requirements of the ACCMA and not to satisfy the City's General Plan or Tri Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan requirements described in the previous section. Peak Hour Factor Assumptions The author of Mysteries of the PHF, Ransford S. McCourt, suggests guidelines for the appropriate use of PHF's for existing, near term and future traffic conditions. The author suggests using actual PHF's for existing conditions and 0.95 to 0.99 for future congested environments and/or where Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs are effectively implemented or anticipated (spreading out peak traffic). Thus, utilizing aPHF = I.0 in future 20 year analysis may be reasonable if assumptions are stated such as the anticipation of TDM measures. Based on the above and the City of Dublin's promotion of Transit Oriented Developments (TOD's) in the City, aPHF = 0.97 was assumed for the analysis of all study intersections under future traffic conditions (i.e. Short Term Cumulative Conditions and Long Term Cumulative Conditions). Significant Impact Criteria The study intersections, arterial segments, and freeway segments were evaluated according to the following criteria: City o f Dublin Intersections An impact to a study intersection would be significant if an intersection operating at an acceptable level of service would deteriorate to unacceptable levels with the addition of project or cumulative traffic. The City of Dublin General Plan Circulation Element and Scenic Highways Guiding Policy standards require that the City strive for LOS D at intersections. Therefore, any study intersections operating below LOS D are considered potentially significantly impacted and will be evaluated for mitigation. City o f Pleasanton Intersections According to the adopted 1996 Circulation Element of the City of Pleasanton General Plan, LOS D is the Citywide traffic operational threshold. There are exceptions to meeting this threshold within the Downtown Area; however, none of the study intersections are located within Downtown Pleasanton. The September 2008 Draft Circulation Element allows gateway intersections, such as the ramp intersections along I-580, to exceed the LOS D standard, but this document has not yet been approved so its policies cannot be applied. An intersection is considered significantly impacted if the addition of project trips deteriorates the level of service from LOS D (or better) to LOS E or LOS F. Also, a project significantly impacts an intersection operating at LOS E or LOS F if it adds more than 10 trips to the intersection. The Hacienda Drive /Eastbound I-580 off-ramp, Hacienda Page 8 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 5~q °f 155 ~,~~~ o ifi~ 4i Q~^le v{~i i _ :: FS $ t1 i Lc'L^t:: Drive /Westbound I-580 off -ramp, and Hopyard Road/ Eastbound I-580 off-ramp intersections are Pleasanton intersections. Routes o f Regional Significance Routes identified since certification of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR would be considered to have a significant impact if the routes fail to comply with the applicable standard of the General Plan (i.e. LOS D). The General Plan requires the City to make a good faith effort to maintain Level of Service D on arterial segments of, and at the intersections of, routes of~regional significance (Dublin Boulevard, Dougherty Road, Tassajara Road and San Ramon Road) or implement transportation improvements or other measures to improve the level of service. If such improvements are not possible or sufficient, and the Tri-Valley Transportation Council cannot resolve the matter, the City may modify the level of service standard assuming other jurisdictions are not physically impacted (General Plan Circulation and Scenic Highways Guiding Policy E). CMA (Arterial and Freeway Segments) The LOS standard for CMA analysis is LOS E. The CMA does not have a policy for determining a threshold of significance for segments operating unacceptably without the project Rather, professional judgment is required to determine project level impacts. Therefore, for the purpose of this traffic impact assessment, if a segment operates unacceptably without the project, the impacts of the proposed project are considered significant if the contribution of project traffic is at least two percent of the total traffic. ' Public Transit Public transit impacts would be significant if the demand for public transit service increases above that which local transit operators or agencies could accommodate. In addition, an impact would be significant if the project conflicts with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation. An impact is also significant if the project disrupts existing transit service or does not provide amenities necessary to accommodate transit demand. Tragic Safety A significant traffic safety impact would include a project design feature, such as a sharp curve or { potentially hazardous intersection that would not be consistent with City of Dublin engineering design standards or standards published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) or Caltrans. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation ': As listed in the City of Dublin Environmental Checklist, pedestrian and bike impacts would be ', significant if the project conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts and bicycle racks). A guiding principle for the architectural design of the project must include a pedestrian oriented design that provides safe and strong pedestrian connections between uses, through parking areas and along street corridors. Page 9 Report -Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 5$° °f ~f55 -~< ~':-~nsr,~; ration Consuitant; Existing Conditions This section includes analysis results for existing traffic conditions in the study area, and establishes the baseline traffic conditions for the assessment of project impacts. Existing Roadway Network Interstate 580 (1-580) is an eight-lane, east-west freeway that connects Dublin with local Tri-Valley cities such as Livermore and Pleasanton as well as regional cities such as Oakland, Hayward and Tracy. In the vicinity of the City of Dublin, I-580 carries between 195,000 and 218,000 vehicles per day (vpd) (occording to Caltrans' 2006 Tra)~c Volumes on California State Highways). I-580 interchanges are located at San Ramon Road/Foothill Road, Dougherty Road/Hopyard Road, Hacienda Drive, Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road, and Fallon Road/EI Charro Road. Interstate 680 (I-680) is a six-to-eight lane north-south freeway that provides access to the south to Fremont, Milpitas and San Jose, and north to San Ramon, Danville, Walnut Creek and beyond. In the vicinity of the City of Dublin, I-680 carries between 154,000 and 173,000 vpd (according to Cahrans' 2006 Tragic Volumes on California State Highways). i Dougherty~Rood is a north-south arterial in the City of Dublin. It consists of four lanes between the Alameda/Contra Costa county line and Dublin Boulevard, and six lanes between Dublin Boulevard and I-580. South of I-580, it continues with six lanes as Hopyard Road in the City of Pleasanton. The project fronts Dougherty Road. A current construction project is widening Dougherty Road to six lanes between Houston Place and Dublin Boulevard and eight lanes between Dublin Boulevard and I-580. Airway Boulevard/Isabel Avenue (SR-84) is an arterial in the project, vicinity. It provides access to traffic from the I-580/Airway Boulevard interchange to the residential and commercial uses in northwest Livermore and also the Livermore Airport and the Las Positas Golf Courses to the south of I-580 freeway. It connects to I-680 via the extension of Isabel Avenue, Vallecitos Road. Dublin Boulevard is a major east-west arterial in the City of Dublin. Dublin Boulevard, west of Dougherty Road is a four- to six-lane divided road fronted largely by retail and commercial land uses. Between Dougherty Road and Tassajara Road, Dublin Boulevard is a six-lane divided arterial fronted primarily by residential uses, commercial uses, and vacant land. Dublin Boulevard extends i east of Tassajara Road to Lockhart Street as a four- to five-lane roadway fronted by new mixed- ; use development. A future extension to Fallon Road is planned to open when improvements to the I-580/Fallon Road interchange are completed by approximately 2010. Hacienda Drive is an arterial that provides access to I-580. North of I-580, Hacienda Drive is a three-to five-lane arterial running in the north-south direction from Gleason Drive southerly to Dublin Boulevard, and six-to-seven lanes from Dublin Boulevard to I-580. It is primarily fronted by commercial, office and residential uses. South of I-580, Hacienda Drive is a divided six-lane major arterial in the City of Pleasanton. 0 Tassajara Road connects with Santa Rita Road at I-580 to the south and continues north to the Town of Danville. It is four to six lanes wide between I-580 and North Dublin Ranch Drive. It is ~ named Camino Tassajara north of the Contra Costa County line. Page 10 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ~g l ~ c~ J s i" i €-ans~or`~aci~r~ ~onsuit~^~s Santa Rita Road is a major north-south six-lane divided urban arterial in the City of Pleasanton. It connects with Tassajara Road at I-580 to the north. It serves the east side of Pleasanton, including the Hacienda Business Park, and provides access to the downtown Pleasanton area. Existing Transit Service Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (Wheels) Wheels is the fixed-route bus transit service provided by the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) for the Tri-Valley communities of Dublin, Livermore, and Pleasanton. Current bus routes serving the East Dublin area, including the immediate project vicinity along I-580, are Routes I , 3, 10, 12, 20, and 202 Route 1 consists of Routes I A, I B, I C, and I E. Route I A operates clockwise and Route I B operates counter-clockwise. Routes I A and I B connects the Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station with the Santa Rita jail, Hacienda Crossing, and the Rose Pavilion. Routes I A and I B operate on weekdays between 5:40 a.m. and 9:OOp.m. Route I C operates via the southern part of Routes I A and I B during the morning and afternoon peak periods between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and 3:45 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. respectively. Route I E connects Dublin BART to Dublin Ranch via Central Parkway and Tassajara Road during the same periods as Route I C. Service is provided with 30-minute headways. Route I operates on Saturdays between 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Route 3 connects the Dublin BART station and Stoneridge Mall along Dublin Boulevard and Foothill Road. Route 3 serves the existing Arroyo Vista housing site with a bus stop located on the west side of the Mariposa Drive loop. Service is provided from 5:40 a.m. to 8:10 p.m. on weekdays with 30-minute headways. Route 3 operates on Saturdays between 6:20 a.m. and 7:20 p.m. Route 10 provides 24-hour daily service between the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and LLNUSandia Transit Hub in Livermore at 30-minute headways. Route 12 provides service between the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and the Livermore Transit Center at 30-minute headways on weekdays between 5:30 a.m. and 9:50 p.m. Weekend service on Route 12 is provided between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. at one-hour headways. Route 20 provides weekday morning and afternoon service at 30-minute headways. Route 20 connects the Dublin BART station with two Altamont Commuter Express (ACE) train stations in Livermore. Route 202 provides school service connecting Dougherty Road to Wells Middle School and Dublin High School with one morning run and one afternoon run. Route 202 serves the existing Arroyo Vista housing site. DART Direct Access Response Transit (DART) provides service during off-peak hours when most fixed- route buses are not in operation. Weekday service operates between 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. and from 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. DART operates on Saturdays between 8:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Dial-a- Ride paratransit is also available seven days a week for passengers with disabilities. Page I I Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 5$a ~- ~5 ~i~~; 'ranspa ~xcian ~~nSUIL~ntS sARr BART provides regional rail transit service in the study area via the Dublin/Pleasanton station. BART runs at I5- to 20-minute headways between 4:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. on weekdays. Saturday service is available every 20 minutes between 6:00 a.m. and 12:45 a.m. Service is also available on Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 12:45 a.m. with 20-minute headways. A new West Dublin-Pleasanton station is currently under construction and is expected to be operational within about three years. Additionally, long-range planning studies are currently being conducted to determine the feasibility of extending BART lines to Livermore. The studies also will ', examine alternative means of improving transit service to Livermore in the BART corridor until funds are available to construct the BART extension. ACE Commuter Train Altamont Commuter Express (ACE) offers an alternative to the automobile for regional commute trips from Livermore to Pleasanton and the South Bay area including Fremont, Santa Clara and San Jose. ACE trains provide westbound service to the South Bay area in the morning and eastbound service in the evening. There is one ACE station in Pleasanton near the intersection of Bernal Avenue and Pleasanton Avenue. Livermore has two ACE stations, one in Downtown near the Livermore Avenue/Railroad Avenue intersection and the other on Vasco Road, at the Vasco Road/Brisa Street intersection. In the morning, westbound trains stop at Pleasanton at approximately 5:35 a.m., 6:50 a.m., 7:55 a.m. and 10:45 a.m. In the afternoon and evening, eastbound trains stop at Pleasanton at approximatelyl2:56 p.m., 4:26 p.m., 5:26 p.m. and 6:26 p.m. Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation The project site is bounded on the west by the Alamo Creek Trail that extends to Amador Valley Boulevard and to the Dublin City Limits to the north and the Iron Horse Trail and the Dublin Civic Center and Dublin Sports Grounds to the south. The Alamo Creek Trail is a multipurpose trail that provides access to the Alamo Creek Villas and Park Sierra Apartment homes located west of the trail Currently, a sidewalk exists on the west side of Dougherty Road that borders the project site. There are no southbound bicycle lanes in this area, but there is an eight foot shoulder in the southbound direction, not specifically designated for bicycle usage. On the east side of Dougherty Road, aClass Itwo-way north /south bike path with exclusive right-of-way runs parallel to Dougherty Road between Fall Creek Road just south of the Alameda County Line and Monterey Drive. Southbound cyclists are required to cross Dougherty Road westbound on the south side of the Monterey Drive intersection to continue southbound. A "Bicycle Crossing" warning sign facing northbound traffic exists south of this intersection to warn motorists of this crossing. The northbound bike path begins on Dougherty Road at Scarlett Drive/Iron Horse Trail. Iron Horse Trail is a major north-south multipurpose trail with a Class I bikeway, and also serves pedestrian and equestrian uses. The Iron Horse Trail starts from the Dublin /Pleasanton BART station and continues north through the San Ramon Valley to Concord. Currently, there are sidewalks on both sides of the internal streets within the project site. There are no existing dedicated bicycle lanes on these streets and thus cyclists are expected to share these streets with autos. Page 12 Report - Tra f~c Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 5SS3 ~f ~ 55 ~ftf ~f an~nor~z~lor= ~c,E~suuit~rE~, Existing Traffic Volumes and Lane Geometry The existing weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour vehicle turning movement counts at all study intersections were collected in May 2007. The traffic counts were balanced for a few closely spaced intersections to account for differences in the manual counts. The volume balancing is based on a review of traffic count data collected for previous City of Dublin traffic studies. Appendix B contains the traffic count sheets. Figure 3 illustrates the existing peak hour turning movement volumes at all study intersections. Figure 4 shows the existing intersection lane configurations and traffic controls at all study intersections. Page 13 Report - Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 58 1 ~ X55 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista. Housing Development Figure Existing Conditions Turning Movement Volumes 3 Intersection I Intersection 2 Intersettion 3 Intersection 4 Intersettion 5 Dougherty Rd./Amador Vly. Blvd. Dougherty Rd./Scarlett Dr. Dougherty Rd./Sierra Ln. Dougherty Rd./Dublin Blvd. Dougherty RdJWB I-580 Off Ram W ~ rn N ~ v' ~ ~ rn 8;,0 ~~ x.00 Q' ~ N vM ~ ~~ v N .,,. ~ .rtL 1~ ~ N ~"? ~o~w u~'D..o ~ 1(9) ~?° ~ 163(394) ins ~'~ ~ ~i` ` mgr f-5 (6) `f ~`" (297(646) ~~ ~ 552!573) ~` ~' ~ o is~ R `gyp 1' ~ ~ - 18 (19} t~ ~ ~- -: 216 (302) r ~ ~ 426 (251) 94 (330) ±I ~ ~. 9i,~4~i.Y ~-2s J~isi 31 (87)~ R, ~ ~ 27 (87) ~! ~, f X 324 (294) ~~ 2 (4)~ ~ ~'~ 209 (853)~- ~r,'.~-. ! ~I ~ vN ~ ~"ooo ~j 50(106) +~ co` 285(528) ~~rn ~~ ~~.,~ ~o~ ~~ ~7V t_n ~L~fpp1 d' r n tD O l+1 Intersection 6 Intersettion 7 Intersection 8 Intersection 9 Intersection 10 Hopyard Rd./EB I-580 Off-Ramp Dublin Blvd.lScarlett Dr Hacienda Dr./Dublin Blvd. Hacienda DrJWB I-580 Off-Ram Hacienda Dr./EB I-580 Off-Ramp ~ ~ cO M ~: ~ ~' N U7 W m ~ ~ a ^ (p.v (D M N ~ ~~ (h V r ~ N W `- lf1 m ~ m th ~""' ~~.F-690 1.307 ~~N X40(14) `Vi`i' R 300(414) r <' + O ) 15 {20 ~ ~ ~ ~ 408 (196) ~ ~ ~ 531 (304) ~ * 5 (9)~ ~ 42 (239) R ~ ~ 694 596 ~ 590 (832) ~' ~l I I i ~ ( )_ 820(1,528)-i 186(1,113)-+----,--, 1,092(582) 1,310(995) ~N mm u~aorn ~N 21 (13)~ o" 116(488) ~ io~v ~~ y rno ~~ ~~ ~-u~ co r° ~ ~ m %O "co mN ~ ~~'~ ~~.~j CN ~ ~: ~ ~ W'k 7 %Y Intersection I I Intersection 12 Intersection 13 Intersection I4 LEGEND Dougherty Rd./Ventura Dr. Dougherty Rd./N. Mariposa Dr Dougherty Rd./S. Mariposa Dr. Dougherty Rd./Monterey Dr. o o ~ • Study Intersection °' °i ° m ~ Project Site Driveway ~r ~_~ ~o v~ ~?~ XX AM Peak HourVolume ~ ~ ~~ ~, s~ + ~ ~ (XX) PM Peak HourVolume 8 (2)~ ~ t 3 (6)-1/ Ri * 28 (13)-~ •) ~ 0 (0}~I h: ~ ---- Future Roadway 1 (1)-~ ~ ~ 3 (6)-;~ o 0 16 (9)-~ ~ ^ 8 (14)-~ M ~ ~: Right turn volumes don't p ~~ ....~ o V •- ~ ~ ~ v m ~ go through intersection ac co ~ ~ °o^' ~ ~ NORTH PCOJeCt Not to kale Site ° 1 ,o. ~~ y ,P~~,E 8TH ST. BRODER BLVD, ~ o 12 ~P~ 13 P ~ c., GLEASON DR. a ~ sP `' 14 ° o 2 ~ `-- 0 J 0 . ' O Z l 1 ~ . ~' ~ ~. si , 1 a ~' ~ ~ U y r , ¢ 'PC `'~-------------------------- = CENTRAL PKWY C ~Q j ~~ . q ~~ `O ~ SIERRALN ~• ~ S~E~RAV~. 3 . 7 ~ DUBLIN BLVD. ~ N 4 ~ s c ~R~ ~ ' FlT a HACIc NO $ ~ CRUS ~ 9 S~ 4' CT. ~a G :1 JOHNSON DR s OWENS DR. 10 I5/-W I T I l S- 4(9/08 - DM IRR' City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Figure Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls 4 Intersection I Dougherty Rd./Amador Vly. Blvd. Intersection 2 Dougherty Rd./Scarlett Dr. Intersettion 3 Dougherty Rd./Sierra Ln. Intersection 4 Dougherty Rd./Dublin Blvd. Intersection S Dougherty Rd.NVB I-580 Off-Ram o ~11~ _ w w ,~~~1 ~ ~ ~ tt~ Ott ~ W } LL Intersettion 6 Hopyard Rd./EB I-580 Off-Ramp Intersettion 7 Dublin Blvd./Scarlett Dr. Intersection 8 Hacienda Dr./Dublin Blvd. Intersection 9 Hacienda DrJWB I-580 Off-Ram Intersection I O Hacienda DI•./EB I-580 Off-Ramp w w •~~11 ~ f-- 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~-11 R :: ~ w X11 r.~ tt~ ~ ?t~ ~ i t~~' ~ W ~ Overlap LL w LL Intersection I I Dougherty Rd./Ventura Dr. Intersection 12 Dougherty Rd./N. Mariposa Dr. Intersection 13 Dougherty Rd./S. Mariposa Dr. Intersection 14 Dougherty Rd./Monterey Dr. LEGEND ~ Study Intersection ~ Project Site Driveway 'Traffic Signal X11 X11 X11 X11 ~- Stop Sign R ~ ~ el ,p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l t i -Future Roadwa= N O RT H IJot to Scal= Project Site ° 1 11 ~~o e ~yt'~~~y 12 8TH ST. 0 RODER BLVD. Pc P~ 13 ~~. a, GLEASON DR. ~ - `. 14 L] 0 0 J Q c 2 } c = l~ ~ Z Z ^ ~ W D: -------------------- a "- CENTRAL PKWY. ~ .:1 q ~~y~ ~ o ~ ~ ^ SIERRALN'~ SIE~RA~~~ 3 7' DUBLIN BLVD, 8. 'a Q ~' 4 s~ 9ni<~rr 5 w Qp N HACIENO cROSS~-v ti cT. .,rr :1 ~ 9 JOHNSON DR. s OWENS DR. 1 O 157-001 T I T S - 4/9/08 - DM -I ~,, ~, .a;:~r}~; .Atari ^r:suztar~ts Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Existing Conditions Table II below summarizes peak hour levels of service at all study intersections under Existing Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Under Existing Conditions, all signalized study intersections currently are operating at acceptable City standards of LOS D or better except Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard (LOS E during the p.m. peak period). A City Capital Improvement Program Project is underway to increase the capacity of Dougherty Road in the vicinity of Dublin Boulevard. With the improvements scheduled for completion in August 2008, the intersection of Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard will operate at an acceptable LOS B or better. Also, under Existing Conditions, all unsignalized study intersections currently are operating at LOS A with an acceptable minor approach service level of LOS D or better, except Dougherty RoadNentura Drive and Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive. The critical minor approaches of these two intersections are both currently operating at LOS E or worse during the a.m. peak period. Table I1: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Existing Conditions ID Signalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour V / C LOS V / C LOS I Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard 0.75 C 0.74 C 2 Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive 0.58 A 0.55 A 3 Dougherty Road/Park Sierra 0.66 B 0.62 B 4 Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevards .....__...,_......~__.._..---..._ ...................-----._..._.~..._._...._................._._.__......._._.._._.__......................._..._.............. With City's Capital Improvement Project 0.67 ..........---.._..._..._.........._._ 0.48 B ._....__.._.._..........._._...._ A 0.98 _....._......................._....._...._.. 0.63 E ..............~...__....._._........._... B 5 Dougherty Road/Westbound I-580 off-ramp 0.58 A 0.56 A 6 Hopyard Road/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ~ 0.72 C 0.71 C 7 Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive 0.20 A 0.39 A 8 Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard 0.28 A 0.54 A 9 Hacienda Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp 0.34 A 0.44 A 10 Hacienda Drive/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp 0.53 A 0.55 A ID Unsignalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS I I Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive 0.2(42.5) A (E) 0.0 (2 f .6) A (C) 12 Dougherty Road/N. Mariposa Drive 0.1(27.7) A (D) 0. I (I 9.5) A (C) 13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive 1.2(62.8) A (F) 0.2(22) A (C) 14 Dougherty Road/Monterey Drive 0.1(18.4) A (C) 0. I (I 2.2) A (B) ~- V / C =Volume-to-capacity ratio for overall signalized intersection X (X) =Intersection level of service (Level of service for the minor approach) X.X (X.X) =Average delay in seconds per vehicle overall one-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) intersection (Delay in seconds per vehicle to minor approach) a Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS conditions The existing a.m. level of service is worse than indicated due to underserved demand resulting from southbound traffic congestion. Page I6 Report - Tra1~c Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 58l ~ X55 -~~:M ~~nsuican*_s Project Characteristics Project Description Based on information provided by the City of Dublin in March 2007, the proposed Arroyo Vista residential development will include approximately 378 dwelling units. There will be three types of housing: 50 affordable senior units, 130 affordable family units and 198 for sale units. The development will replace 150 units of public housing on a 23.8-acre site. The development will also include a village community center and a childcare center. Primary vehicle access will occur from three reconfigured driveways located on Dougherty Road. Project Trip Generation TJKM estimated project trip generation based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip ', generation rates, shown in Table III. The project is expected to generate approximately 2,868 daily trips, with 198 trips occurring during the a.m. peak hour and 224 trips occurring during the p.m. peak hour. Since the project is a redevelopment of an existing site with similar land uses, TJKM subsequently discounted volumes generated by the existing land use at the existing site driveways. As a result of these discounts, the project is expected to generate 83 net a.m. peak hour trips and 110 net p.m. peak hour trips. Appendix D contains a detailed project trip generation calculation spreadsheet. Table III: Project Trip Generation Land Use Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour ITE Code ~ ~ Size Unit Rate Totol Trip In:Out In Out Tot°- Trip In:Out In Out Tot°I Rate % Rate / Low Rise Apartment (22 I) ~ 58 d.u. 11.8 684 0.61 21:79 7 28 35 0.72 65:35 27 15 42 Rental Townhouse (224)2 72 d.u. 10.5 756 0.70 33:67 17 34 51 0.72 51:49 26 25 51 Senior Housing - Attached (252) - 50 d.u. 3.48 174 0.08 45:55 2 2 4 0.1 I 61:39 3 2 5 Residential Condominium/ 198 d.u. 5.79 1,147 0.45 17:83 15 74 89 0.53 67:33 71 35 104 Townhouse (230) Sub Tot°I Residential Trips 2,762 41 138 179 127 77 204 Day Care Center (565) 48 stu. 4.48 215 0.80 53:47 20 18 38 0.82 47:53 18 21 39 Internalization of Day Care Center Trips - 108 - I 0 -9 - 19 -9 - I 0 - 19 (50% assumed) Net Day Care Trips 107 10 9 19 9 I 1 20 Total Project Trips 2,868 5 I 147 198 136 88 224 Existing Site Traffic 48 67 1 I5 62 52 114 Net Project Trips 3 80 83 74 36 110 motes: a.u. = vwewng units stu. =Students/Children Rates developed from ITE equations ZDaily equation for code 221 was used to estimate the daily trips for code 224 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (7th Edition, 2003) Report - Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Paget 7 January 7, 2009 ~~ I n ~ n G•. ~~ s~~ X55 ~i~: 'rarts~o; ~aCiot-~ ~ort~ uitan=_; ____ _ The study assumes 50 percent internalization of daycare center trips to account for home-based trips made internally within the project site between the residences and daycare center. The daycare center is intended to serve local residents; the home to daycare trip does not leave the immediate project area and affect any surrounding streets or intersections. The other 50 percent of the day care trips are expected to originate externally. ' Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution is a process that determines in what proportion vehicles would travel between a given project site and various destinations outside a given study area. The process of trip assignment determines the various routes that vehicles would take from the project site to each destination using the estimated trip distribution. TJKM used the Dublin Traffic Model to develop trip distribution and assignment of project trips to and from the site. Project trips were assigned to the local street network according to the model's trip distribution. Trips were assigned to the driveways in proportion to residential unit counts. Figures 5 and 6 show the distribution of the net project trips in the study area for the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour respectively. As shown in Figures 5 and 6, the project is expected to generate approximately eight net a.m. peak hour trips and three net p.m. peak hour trips to and from San Ramon. Most of the trips to/from the north of the project site are made via Dougherty Road. Therefore, project impacts in San Ramon are expected to be minimal. Project Site Access Assumptions The following project site access was assumed by considering transit circulation, driveway queuing, and a review of the project site plan for consistency with the City's design policy guidelines. The existing project site access driveways along Dougherty Road will be reconfigured as follows: • Dougherty Road /Monterey Drive will be restricted with aright-in/right-out access traffic control • Dougherty Road /South Mariposa Drive will operate with full access traffic control • Dougherty Road /North Mariposa Drive will be eliminated • Dougherty Road / Ventura Drive will. have alert-turn egress restriction Detailed discussions of the above site access and recommended traffic controls are presented under the "Project Site Circulotion, Parking and Access Review "section of this report. Page f 8 Report -Traffic Study for the Arroyo Visia Housing Development Januory 7. 2009 City of Dublin -tragic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Net Project Trip Distribution Assumptions (A.M. Peak Hour) 157-00 I T I I S- 4/30/08 - DM Figure 5 City of Dublin -Traffic Study forArroyoVista Housing Development Net Project Trip Distribution Assumptions (P.M. Peak Hour) Figure ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~1 ~ll~, -~ ~~s~a; atior, ~ar~sui~an Existing plus Project Conditions This scenario is similar to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of net project traffic to assess any traffic impacts at the study intersections if the project were to be developed immediately. This analysis scenario evaluates the effect that the project has on "baseline" (existing) conditions, as required by CEQA. Figure 7 shows the resulting turning movement volumes at the study intersections under Existing plus Project Conditions. Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Existing plus Project Conditions Table IV summarizes peak hour levels of service at all study intersections under Existing plus Project Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix E. Table IV shows slight increases in measures of effectiveness (MOEs) [i.e. v/c and LOS] compared with Table II for all study intersections. The analysis assumes that the current improvements at Dublin Boulevard / Dougherty Road will be completed by the time the project is developed. Under Existing plus Project Conditions, all study intersections are expected to continue operating at acceptable levels of service. Project driveways along Dougherty Road will be reconfigured with _ the project therefore the MOEs for the "with" and "without" project are not directly comparable. Impact TR- I _ Under Existing Conditions, side-street traffic on S. Mariposa Road at Dougherty Road experiences ': unacceptable LOS F conditions during the a.m. peak hour. The addition of project traffic would exacerbate this condition. This impact is significant. Mitigation Measure TR-I Signalization of the S. Mariposa Road/Dougherty Road intersection would improve operations to LOS A. This improvement would bring the impact to aless-than-significant level. The removal of the Dougherty Road / N. Mariposa Drive intersection together with the proposed eastbound left-turn access restriction at Dougherty Road / Ventura Drive will impact bus circulation, especially for the northbound operations. Detailed discussions and recommendations to mitigate the bus circulation impacts are presented under the "On Site Bus Circulation Options" of this report. Additionally, detailed discussions of site access controls are presented under the "Project Site Circulation, Parking and Access Review" section of this report. Page 2 I Report - Tro~c Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Jonuory 7, 2009 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Figure Existing Plus Project Conditions Turning Movement Volumes 7 Intersection I Intersection 2 Intersection 3 Intersettion 4 Intersection 5 Dougherty Rd.lAmadorVly. Blvd. Dougherty Rd./Scarlett Dr Dougherty Rd.lSierra Ln. Dougherty Rd./Dublin Blvd. Dougherty RdJW61-580 Off-Ram ^ O N ~. ~N `D~ ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~i~" ~ ~y >> . ~ ~ Op O] V1n ~ co'N~.o ~ 1(9) °' ;'- ~-5 (6) I~ ~ y. - 18 (19) ~ f~ '••~ CD ~ v(D ~ ~?~ ~ 163(404 `~'~ ~ ," ~-297 (646; r ~ ~ j 216 (302) ~ ~. l11 O M v~ n~ - 552 (579) a~ ~ ~ 426 (251) 94 (330) `-~ f 330 (312) ~A~~~J ~ ~ j'o~i ~ ' 31 (88),( R, l ~ 2 (4)~ 27 (107j,1 ~, f 209 (853 -y1 ~cp vN E % 6% F/,• ~ ` ~, .~ rj~ miov 50(106) i~ cnv -- rnrn~ 285(528)" °~° ~,~I o~ oo~ ~ v ~o~ J ~~~ N~.~ ono ~_~_ v m ~ ~ o ri m ~'^ Intersection 6 Intersection 7 Intersection 8 Intersection 9 Intersection 10 Hopyard Rd./EB 1-580 Off-Ramp Dublin Blvd./Scarlett Dr. Hacienda Dr/Dublin Blvd. Hacienda Dr/VVB I-580 Off-Ram Hacienda Dr/EB I-560 Off-Ramp ~ ~~~ O p ~' (D M ~ N '~' N (D CD M N ~. V r` N M. ~~ ~-691 (1,319) ~~ 15(20) ("JOB ~ ~~ O N R') - 40 (14) °,"JN 1404 (517) ~~~ l~178(196) ~~ ~ rn C °J - 300 414 sl1 531 (304) ~~ o ao ~ 591 (839)-~ ~ ~ 1,310(995) Nn m V 5 (10) f~ •) ~- 821 (1,528)-- ._~ 21 (13)1 °M ~ 43 (239) ~ ~ f~ 191 (1,114)-~ ------ 119(489) ovm uJ m vJ `~ I ~~ 694 (596)_ ~, 1,093 583 ( )~ rno .~-.JtJ O ~N ~~ ao r O ~ u7 0~ N If1 tD cnO Jn m ~O OM r~ co ~rn °m v -K Intersettion I I Intersection 12 Intersection 13 Intersection 14 LEGEND Doughert Rd /Ventures Dr Dou hert Rd /N Mari D D h Rd /S M y . g y . . posa r oug erty . . ariposa Dr Dougherty Rd./Monterey Dr. • Study Intersection o ° o Q Project Site Driveway v~ ~ ~ ti ~ XX AM Peak Hour Volume "' ~ Does not exist with project ` j~ ~ '~ N n ~ ~ (XX) PM Peak Hour Volume 24 (15) ~ ~'~ 33 (20)-~ ~ ~ 24 {15)- ~ '~ - - Future Roadwa Y o ~ 66 (38) ~ ~ ~ N :r• Right turn volumes don't N ~ o v ~? go through intersection r> cc o ~ ~ v m Project N Site ~ No; r~ s~aie 1 11 ~~' ~~~ JP~~S% 12 8TH ST. BRODER BLVD. p- P~P~O 13 olyc GLEASON DR. P^ ~' 14 , ~ o 2 - • ° a J ° ~ ` `~~. F- ~ ' Q Z Z W ° fr ~' CJ~ w 4'l ~~ ~ ~~- -- "----------------------- _ CENTRAL PKWY. ~ 1 A ~~~ ~ p `~ ~ SIERRALN.~• u4i SIE~,RA~-~' 3 7• DUBLIN BLVD. 8 F 4 s~ W 9~~ETT z Q° HACIEIyC 5 ~~,, CROSS ~ CT. ~~ /ti 9 C .1 JOHNSON DR. 6 OWENS DP•. 10 5`f3 ~ x(55 ~;, r.OT'.=Ujtaf?~~ Table IV: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Existing plus Project Conditions Existing Conditions Existing + Project Conditions ID Signalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour V/ C LOS V/ C LOS V/ C LOS V I C LOS I Doughercy Road / Amador Valley Boulevard 0.75 C 0.74 C 0.76 C 0.75 C 2 Doughercy Road /Scarlett Drive 0.58 A 0.55 A 0.62 B 0.61 B 3 Dougherty Road /Park Sierra 0.66 B 0.62 B 0.68 B 0.64 B 4 Dougherty Road /Dublin Boulevard) ------------------------------------- With City's Capital Improvement Project - ---------- 0.48 - ---- A - ------------- 0.63 - ----- B - ---------- 0.49 - ------- B - ------------- 0.63 - ----- B 5 DonPherty Road /Westbound I-580 off- 0.58 A 0.56 A 0.59 A 0.56 A 6 Hopyard Road /Eastbound I-580 off-ramp 0.72 C 0.71 C 0.72 C 0.71 C 7 Dublin Boulevard /Scarlett Drive 0.2 A 0.39 A 0.21 A 0.4 A 8 Hacienda Drive /Dublin Boulevard 0.28 A 0.54 A 0.26 A 0.51 A 9 Hacienda Drive /Westbound I-580 off-ramp 0.34 A 0.44 A 0.34 A 0.44 A 10 Hacienda Drive /Eastbound I-580 off-ramp 0.53 A 0.55 A 0.53 A 0.53 A ID Unsignalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS Deloy LOS Defoy LOS I I Dougherty Road / Ventura Drives 0.2(42.5) A (E) 0.0 (21.6) A (C) 0.2(I 9.2) A (C) 0. I (I 2.6) A (B) 12 Doughercy Road / N. Mariposa Drive3 0. I (27.7) A (D) 0. I (I 9.5) A (C) - - - - 3 Doughercy Road / S. Mariposa Drivel ----------------------------------------------- With Tragic Signols as Mitigation4 1.2(62.8) ------------- - A (F) ----- - 0.2(22) -------------- - A (C) -------- - 3.7 (91.4) ---------- 0.67 A (F) ------- B 0.8 (23.2) ------------ 0.57 A (C) ---- A 14 Dougherty Road /Monterey Drivel 0.1(18.4) A (C) 0. I (I 2.2) A (B) 0.2(20.6) A (C) 0.1(I 2.5) A (B) Notes: LOS =Level of Service V / C =Volume-to-capacity ratio for overall signalized intersection X (X) =Intersection level of service (Level of service for the minor approach) X.X (X.X) =Average delay in seconds per vehicle overall one-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) intersection (Delay in seconds per vehicle to minor approach) Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS conditions ICity's CIP intersection improvement project is assumed to be complete by the time the Project is developed zReconfigured driveway as proposed in Arroyo Vista project 3lntersection does not exist with project 4Performance measure is v/c Page 23 Report - 7ra~c Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 5~1`I °~" X55 -~,~~: i ~"~ iISG~G~%3uE0~t ~UflSUiiaflt Short Term Cumulative (2015) Conditions This section includes the analysis results for 2015 traffic conditions in the study area. Dublin Traffic Model (2015) Assumptions The Dublin Traffic Model (DTM) was used for the future 2015 forecasts. In order to forecast traffic generated by land uses, the DTM divides the region into traffic analysis zones (TAZs), which contain information on existing and/or projected land uses that are located within a particular TAZ. Each TAZ is connected to the adjacent street network via a connector, which provides access to and from the TAZ. Depending on the type of land uses allocated to each zone, the TAZ will generate a certain combination of outbound trips (trip production) and inbound trips (trip attraction) during the analysis period(s). For example, a residential TAZ would generate a net production of trips in the a.m. peak hour and a net attraction of trips in the p.m. peak hour. Conversely, a TAZ that contains office development would generate a net attraction of trips in the a.m. peak hour and a net production of trips in the p.m. peak hour. The expected 2015 land uses for each TAZ within City of Dublin were developed using a linear interpolation between existing 2004 land uses and 2025 Buildout land uses, in consultation with City staff. The CCTA Model 2025 land uses were conservatively assumed for the 2015 analysis for areas outside the City of Dublin. The TAZ map is contained in Appendix F. Detailed land uses within each TAZ are shown in Table I of Appendix F. Under Short Term Cumulative conditions, the network used in the analysis included arterial w extensions and improvements planned in the Tri-Valley Area, including the following: I. Dublin Boulevard between Tassajara Road and North Canyons Parkway at Doolan Road (Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Program). ~' 2. Fallon Road between existing terminus at the Dublin Ranch Golf Course and Tassajara Road (Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Program). 3. Central Parkway between Arnold Road and east of Fallon Road (Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Program). ,~; 4. All local and collector roadways in Eastern Dublin within Dublin Ranch and areas to the west (Eastern Dublin Specific Plan -most are constructed). 5. Planned improvements to the Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection and the widening of Dougherty Road from four to six lanes between I-580 to Houston Place (under construction with a completion date in 2008). '"'" 6. All improvements identified for the Dublin Transit Center and the Blake Hunt (previously ~,, IKEA) retail center (Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Program). 7. Windemere Parkway connection with Camino Tassajara in Contra Costa County (Now open). ~~- 8. EI Charro Road between I-580 and Stanley Boulevard (Pleasanton General Plan). 9. Busch Road connection with EI Charro Road (Pleasanton General Plan). ""` 10. Stoneridge Drive connection with EI Charro Road (Pleasanton General Plan). I I. Jack London Boulevard extension between the Livermore Airport area and EI Charro Road (City of Livermore General Plan). 12. Widening of Route 84 (Isabel Avenue and Vallecitos Road) to six lanes north of Stanley Boulevard and four lanes south of Stanley Boulevard and on Vallecitos Road (Fully funded with a target completion date in 2012). Page 24 Report - Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 Sq5 ~ f q55 _ ~ 1;~~~ vOf!Sul:c~R~ In addition, the following freeway and interchange improvements were also included: • The Phase I Fallon Road/I-580 interchange improvements currently planned by the Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton, and Caltrans (City of Dublin -Now under construction with completion scheduled for 2009). • The I-680/West Las Positas interchange in Pleasanton is not included since Pleasanton has no plans to construct it. • The Isabel (Rt. 84)/I-580 interchange Stage I and II improvements. This includes the removal of ramps at Portola Avenue (Fully funded -Construction is scheduled to occur from 2009 to 2012). • Improvements to I-580 interchanges in Livermore identified in the City of Livermore General Plan at N. Livermore Avenue, N. First Street, Vasco Road and Greenville Road (City o f Livermore General Plan). • Improvement of I-580 between Santa Rita Road/Tassajara Road and Vasco Road to include four mixed flow lanes, one HOV lane and one auxiliary lane in each direction (Fully funded - Construction is scheduled to be complete by 2015). • Construction of the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART station (Under construction -scheduled to be complete by 2010). • No extension of BART facilities east of the existing Dublin/Pleasanton station. • The 2015 network does not assume the planned extension of Scarlett Drive from Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard. Therefore Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive is analyzed as a three-leg ("T") intersection. Figure 8 shows the Short Term Cumulative Conditions traffic volume forecasts using the Dublin Traffic Model. All planned improvements, including the study intersection lane configurations and traffic control under Short Term Cumulative Conditions, is shown on Figure 9. Page 25 Report - Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 5~fb ~ q55 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Figure Short Term Cumulative (20 15) Conditions Turning Movement Volumes g Intersection I ugherry Rd./AmadorVly. ro m o~ ^_ `r-' o O ~ m 'A M~ a 352 (345) rl T 502 (390) ~ ~ ~ v cn ~~ M O Intersection 6 Hopyard Rd./EB I-580 Off-Ram ~ ~. ~~ 887 (875) 1,575 (1,095) mrn c+~ c+~ N ~ n~ N N Intersettion I I Dougherty Rd./Ventura Dr. 0 ~~ N N ~' 1 (1)~ =~ om v ~f--1.430 (2,56; Intersection 3 Dougherty Rd./Sierra Ln. c _~ M ^ o ~ u~ ~ 11 (30) °' N `_ ~-- 5 6 ~~ 1 ~~- 1 51( (20) 40 (100)_x/ ~ r ~ 51 (106) °o° ro~ N ~~ O Intersection 8 Hacienda Dr.IDublin Blvd. m .., ~nvco ~~^ N ca'o m ~n ~! 118 (27) C °"" ~-1,323 (852) ~~ ~ ~- -r 684 (298) 161 (250) ~ ~ ~ rI 445(1,287)--- ~~.., 133(490) ~ N ~ ~6)N Intersettion 13 ~ougherry Rd./S. Mariposa Dr. ~ 70 (70) 16 (15)~ ~ (I .246 (1,720)-- ---, 49 (60j-it, N v 01 O O Intersection 12 ~ougherry Rd./N. Mariposa Dr. co ~~ N N 3 (6)~ ~`, 3{6) ~ om v ....oo My Project Site 1 ~~o" ~~ ~,A~~~ 00 ASP 'o seT. ~i L ~i i `-scF ~~ 2~ ~. U ~ ~e = ~ O W ~ O O Intersection 2 Dougherty Rd./Scarlett Dr. N' ~ 'N' N N ~ ~ ~,, ~ r ./ ~~ ~~v h (s~~s ~ ~~~ ~. ~. ~2j ~N N w `~ N ~N Intersection 7 Dublin Blvd./Scarlett Dr. siEkRAU~" 3 4 m~ ~M r ~ ~ N a' ~ 28 (13)?~ h~ 16 (9) ~ v~ ~~ ~~ 0 ST. 4 0 O O \ `. Z ~ .~ ~ '~c -'-------------------------a. LN.' 7~ DUEL w z F~ e o CT JOHNSON DR. OWENS DR. Intersection 4 Dougherty Rd./Dublin Blvd. v N M ~ ~ ~.co ~~ N ~ X327 (396) ~NM ~--1,427(1.7: s" ~ 7- 1278 (650) 164 (206)? Ry! 856 (1,158)-- o-~ ~ co 391 (535) m~v m `-"r^i ~ O ~ N Intersection 9 cienda DrIW6 I-580 Off-Rar _~~ 314 (48'. ~ ` ~ 1,683 (1 m r ~~ OD V N s: Intersection 14 ~M O N ~~ 0 (0)~ R 1 8 (14)'~ v~ m~ v 0 Intersection 5 Dougherty Rd.lWB I-580 Off-R a` u; m ,_ T .`. m rn~ rn ~- R 781 (605) s' ~ ~ 552 (410) m_o N-~ 01 lri V 10 ~ M ~~ Intersection 10 Hacienda Dr./EB I-580 Off-Ra rn ~~ ~~ S (V 1,190 (610) ~ 1,100 (590)-~ ,n~,., ~~_ cam .1 N LEGEND D r. - • Study Intersection ~ Project Site Driveway XX AM Peak Hour Volume (XX)PM Peak Hour Volume ---- Future Roadway Right turn volumes don go through intersection BRODER BLVD. GLEASON DR. 0 a Z U x CENTRAL PKWY. 8 HACIE/yp 9 CROSS~~ 10 NORTH No! to Scale i O tr Q 157-001 T I I S - 5/30/08 - DM sq, o f ~15s City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Figure ShortTerm Cumulative (2015} Conditions Lane Configurations andTraffic Controls 9 Intersection I Intersection 2 Intersection 3 Intersection 4 Intersection S Dougherty Rd./Amador Vly. Blvd. Dougherty Rd./Scarlett Dr. Doughercy Rd./Sierra Ln. Dougherty Rd./Dublin Blvd. Dougherty Rd./WB I-580 Off-Ram ~- ~ 0 ~ 1, ~ ~,~ ~ 11 ~. - ~'~ 111 ~~• ~ ~ ; ,~-- -~ -~` t i taw w Overlap ~ LL Intersection 6 Intersection 7 Intersection B Intersection 9 Intersection 10 Hopyard Rd./EB I-SBD Off-Ramp Dublin Blvd./Scarlett Dr Hacienda Dr.IDublin Blvd. Hacienda DrJWB I-580 Off-Ram Hacienda Dr./EB I-580 Off-Ramp w i~~. ,.~ -~ ,~ TT~' ~ -. ~. w w w Overlap ~ ~ Intersettion I 1 Intersection 12 Intersection 13 Intersection 14 LEGEND Dougherty Rd./Venture Dr. Dougherty Rd./N. Mariposa Dr. Doughercy Rd./S. Mariposa Dr Dougherty Rd./Monterey Dr. ~ Study Intersection Will not exist with project ~ Project Site Driveway 'Traffic Signal -f 1 ~1 ~1 ~1 -+- Stop Sign . ~ ~ ~ tl e ~ ~ ~ a~ ~.. ~ .~,.; I i ----Future Roadway ~~~~ ~ ~ T I -----Under No Project ~' Conditions NORTH Net to Scale Project Site ~~O `y0 dP~Y O~ P~ P~ o„yo PT i !~ ~ ~F q~ ~ ~~ ti' ~e 11 8TH ST. BRODER BLVD. 12 13 GLEASO N DR. O K ~ 14 0 ~ 2 J z < O z F `nn ` a - w ~ '-. ~~C --------------------------- CENTRAL PKWY. ~~ ~ o '. ~ SIERRALN'~ 7 ~ DUBLIN BLVD $ 3 , 4 s 5 ~~. CT r~r~s 9 JOHNSON DR. OWENS DR. ~'1 D a a 157-00 I T I I S- 4/ 1 5/OB - DM 5~~ ~~ ~ 55 Ali i s-a~sE.a, ;,anion ~.~€~sacants 0 Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Short Term Cumulative Conditions Under Short Term Cumulative without Project Conditions, all study intersections are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service except for the following intersections: • The Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard intersection is expected to operate ""' unacceptably at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour and the p.m. peak hour. Improvements to reduce the impacts at the Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard intersection to an acceptable LOS would require widening Dougherty Road to include one additional .~ southbound through lane. There are plans to widen the segment of Dougherty Boulevard between Scarlett Drive and the north City Limits after 2015 under the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP), funded by the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees. Without ~, the CIP improvements, the Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard intersection will operate at an unacceptable level of service. It is recommended that the City monitor the `~` intersection for peak hour volumes on a periodic basis and continue to obtain updated ~, forecasts for future years. Such monitoring should be done to assist the City to comply with General Plan policies requiring implementation of transportation measures to improve ""~' levels of service. • The Hacienda Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp is expected to operate unacceptably at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour. Improvements to reduce the impacts at the Hacienda "•°' Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp intersection to an acceptable LOS would require widening the westbound off-ramp to include an additional lane, and adding one northbound ~ lane to the overcrossing. As described in the Eastern Dublin Property Owners EIR, there '~' are future plans to widen the Hacienda Drive/I-580 interchange. Without the improvements, which are expected to occur after 2015, the intersection will operate at an '~ unacceptable level of service. .kk. Without signalization, eastbound motorists exiting the project driveways along Dougherty Road are expected to experience significant delays due to minimal gaps in traffic needed for safe turns. Table V summarizes peak hour levels of service at all study intersections under Short Term Cumulative Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix G ~,. Page 18 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ~„ -14~ !~' an;p;;rtarior nsuirarr r ,. M rr r 5~~1 ~f q55 Table V: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Short Term Cumulative Conditions Notes: LOS =Level of Service V / C =Volume-to-capacity ratio for overall signalized intersection X (X) =Intersection level of service (Level of service for the minor approach) X.X (X.X) =Average decay in seconds per vehicle overall one-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) intersection (Delay in seconds per vehicle to minor approach) Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS conditions ID Si nalized Int ti n A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour g ersec o V ! C LOS V / C LOS I Dougherty Road / Amador Valley Boulevard I.I I F 1.00 F 2 Dougherty Road /Scarlett Drive 0.82 D 0.61 B 3 Dougherty Road /Park Sierra 0.71 C 0.49 A 4 Dougherty Road /Dublin Boulevard 0.79 C 0.87 D 5 Dougherty Road /Westbound I-580 off-ramp 0.79 C 0.68 B 6 Hopyard Road /Eastbound I-560 off-ramp 0.86 D 0.83 D 7 Dublin Boulevard /Scarlett Drive 0.36 A 0.59 A 8 Hacienda Drive /Dublin Boulevard 0.70 B 0.68 B 9 Hacienda Drive /Westbound I-580 off-ramp 0.99 E 0.82 D 10 Hacienda Drive /Eastbound I-580 off-ramp 0.90 D 0.71 C ID Unsi nolized Intersection Q.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour g De1oy LOS Delay LOS I I Dougherty Road / Ventura Drive 1.5(1 20+) A(F) 0.1(1 20+) A(F) 12 Dougherty Road / N. Mariposa Drive 0.5(1 20+) A(F) 0.5(1 20+) A(F) 13 Dougherty Road / S. Mariposa Drive 17.9(120+) A(F) I.6(I 20+) A(F) 14 Dougherty Road /Monterey Drive 0. I (26.4) A(D) 0.2(16.7) A(C) Page 29 ' Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ~~ °~" X55 --~,r i °arsgo~ ~~,iarP ~ansui~a.n~~, Short Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions This scenario is similar to Short Term Cumulative Conditions, but with the addition of net project traffic to assess any traffic impacts at the study intersections. Figure I 0 shows the resulting turning movement volumes at the study intersections under 2015 plus Project conditions. Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Short Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions Table VI summarizes peak hour levels of service at all study intersections under Short Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix H. Table VI shows little or no change in intersection performance compared with Table V for all study intersections, because the project is expected to add minimal net trips to the roadway network. The intersections of Dougherty Road /Amador Valley Boulevard and Hacienda Drive /Westbound I-580 off-ramp will continue to operate at unacceptable LOS F and LOS E respectively with the addition of the project. The project will increase the volume to capacity (v/c) ratios at the Dougherty Road /Amador Valley Boulevard intersection by 0.01 or less during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. The level of service will remain unchanged at LOS F. Although the project contribution is minor, the project will exacerbate an unacceptable condition. Therefore, project impacts are significant but can be mitigated by widening of Dougherty Road. This is a planned CIP project expected to occur after 2015. The project is expected to add less than 10 trips to the Hacienda Drive /Westbound I-580 off-ramp intersection, and the level of service and v/c ratios will remain unchanged. Per the City of Pleasanton Significance criteria, the project impacts are considered less than significant at the Hacienda Drive !Westbound I-580 off-ramp intersection. Impact TR-2 Under Short-term Cumulative (2015) Conditions, the intersection of Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard would operate at unacceptable LOS F conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The addition of project traffic will exacerbate this condition. This impact is significant. Mitigation Measure TR-2 • Roadway modifications to improve operations to LOS D or better include the addition of a southbound through lane. A project has been identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program, the Dougherty Road Improvements Project, to add an additional through lane in both the northbound and southbound directions on Dougherty Road from the existing six- ., lane cross-section to the south to the northern City Limit. The improvements are planned to be funded by fees collected through the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee (EDTIF) program. Since the Arroyo Vista project is not contained within the EDTIF program area, the Project applicant shall instead make a fair share payment toward the cost of this roadway widening. While construction of these improvements would reduce the impact to aless-than-significant level, because the improvements will likely not be complete by 2015, the impact remains significant and unavoidable. It should be noted that this impact would be temporary until an additional southbound lane is constructed as part of the Dougherty Road Improvements CIP project. It is recommended that the City monitor the intersection for peak hour volumes on a periodic basis and continue to obtain updated forecasts for future years. Such monitoring should be done to assist the City to comply with General Plan policies requiring implementation of transportation measures to improve levels of service. Page 30 Report -Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 1~0t ~- ~i55 ril:r ansco~°~.aian .-.vr~ai3li.3ilr~~ Eastbound motorists exiting the Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa (Intersection 13) driveway are expected to experience excessive delays due to minimal gaps in traffic needed for safe turns. Impact TR-3 Under Short-term Cumulative (2015) Conditions, side-street traffic on S. Mariposa Road at Dougherty Road experiences unacceptable LOS F conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The addition of project traffic would exacerbate this condition. This impact is significant. Mitigation Measure TR-3 Signalization of the S. Mariposa Road/Dougherty Road intersection would improve operations to LOS C during the a.m. peak hour and LOS A during the p.m. peak hour. This improvement would bring the impact to aless-than-significant level. Table VI: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Short Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions Short Term Cumulative Conditions Short Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions ID Signalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS I Dougherty Rd. / Amador Valley Blvd. I.I I F 1.00 F I.I I F 1.01 F 2 Dougherty Rd. /Scarlett Drive 0.82 D 0.61 B 0.82 D 0.63 A 3 Dougherty Rd. /Park Sierra 0.71 C 0.49 A 0.71 C 0.5 A 4 Dougherty Rd. /Dublin Blvd. 0.79 C 0.87 D 0.8 C 0.87 D 5 Dougherty Rd. / WB I-580 off-ramp 0.79 C 0.68 B 0.81 D 0.68 B 6 Hopyard Rd. / EB I-580 off-ramp 0.86 D 0.83 D 0.86 D 0.68 B 7 Dublin Blvd. /Scarlett Drive 0.36 A 0.59 A 0.36 A 0.6 A 8 Hacienda Drive /Dublin Blvd. 0.7 B 0.68 B 0.7 B 0.68 B 9 Hacienda Dr. / WB I-580 off-ramp 0.99 E 0.82 D 0.99 E 0.82 D 10 Hacienda Drive / EB I-580 off-ramp 0.9 D 0.71 C 0.9 D 0.71 C i fi d I A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peok Hour ID Unsigna ze ntersect on Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS I I Dougherty Rd. / Ventura Dr.~ 1.5(120+) A(F) 0. I (120+) A(F) 0.2(28.8) A(D) 0.1(1 6.9) A(C) 12 Dougherty Rd. / N. Mariposa Dr? 0.5(1 20+) A(F) 0.5(1 20+) A(F) - - - - 3 Dougherty Rd. / S. Mariposa Dr. ~ --------------------------------------------------- With tragic signals as mitigation3 17.9(120+) -------------- -- - A(F) ------- - 1.6(1 20+) ------------- - A(F) --- - 57.5(120+) ------------ 0.8 F(F) ------- C 12. I (I 20+) ------------- 0.59 B(F) ----- A 14 Dougherty Rd. /Monterey Dr. ~ 0. I (26.4) A(D) 0.2(16.7) A(C) 0.2(30.7) A(D) 0. I (17.2) A(C) motes: w~ _ ~evei of aervice V / C =Volume-to-capacity ratio for overall signalized intersection X (X) =Intersection level of service (Level of service for the minor approach) X.X (X.X) =Average delay in seconds per vehicle overall one-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) intersection (Delay in seconds per vehicle to minor approach) Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS conditions Reconfigured driveway under project conditions Zlntersection does not exist with project 3Performance measure is V / C Page 3 I Report -Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development f anuary 7, 2009 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Short Term Cumulative (2015) Plus Project Conditions Turning Movement Volumes Figure ~0 Intersection 1 Intersection 2 Intersection 3 Intersettion 4 Intersettion 5 Dougherty Rd./AmadorVly. Blvd. Dougherty Rd./Scarlett Dr. Dougherty Rd./Sierra Ln. Dougheny Rd./Dublin Blvd. Dougherty Rd./WB I-580 Off-Ram ~ ~ ~ O ~ cND M p N ~_ (t`M~ ,~Cv v NO ~~v .~0... o ~ ~ ~ `' ? In ~ 11 (30) N ~ ~ ~ 327 (406) rn °r w 781 (611) ~~ '~ i~` ~ °',`~~ f-5 (6) ~cvr> ('1,427(1,735) r' 552 410 ~' ~ o~~?~ ~~~ ~S s' r h- 1 51 (20) k' - 278 (650) ~ 1 ( j 352 (345) ~`) ~ ~yui~~ uf4~~(2oi 40 (101),( ~, ~ ~! 164 (226) ~,~~ * ~I 502(401) NN ~ r2> 2(6j--orno 856(1,158)--MO~ ~~, ~ '~O' r = ~ 51 (106) C~ ~ 391 (535) ~~~, ?O er M l' N W .~... ~'OOi N li') ~Ql ~ v~ ~v M~ N~in N~ MOB It c0 N M N I~ M ~ _ _ Intersection 6 Intersection 7 Intersection 8 Intersection 9 Intersection 10 Hopyard Rd./EB I-580 Off-Ramp Dublin Blvd./Scarlett Dr. Hacienda Dr/Dublin Blvd. Hacienda DrlWB I-580 Off-Ram Hacienda Dr./EB I-580 Off-Ramp ~ *^'~ m ~ ~ -ti~ ~^ invco ~~ ~R'i us ~°'< <n `~' o°~' c°'omr> - 116(27 ~° ~ ~`" 1^0 ~ )~-1.431 (2.577) "',°' u' f--1,323 (857) I' ~ ~ 1 6834(1,303) ~ N .~~ ~ ~ 70 (70) ~ y ~'+~ X684 (298) 16 16) ±~ R 162 (250) `t ~I 1,190 (610) 888(882 ~ 4~ ( I ~ -~. ~~~.., ~~ 1,101 (591)- ~ 1.247(1,720)-~ 450(1,288) ^n~ mrn ~ m~ 1,575(1,095)-~ ^a°, 49(60j ~ N~ 136(491) cno,rn m~ u`tico 1+) r~ _ vcvv v _ ~ ~r O NN OC' aON~ ~~ ~ p~~ O 1000 O NN to Q)N .,I, N%h Intersection I I Intersection 12 Intersettion 13 Intersection 14 LEGEND Dougherty Rd.IVencura Dr. Dougherty Rd./N. Mariposa Dr Dougherty Rd.lS. Mariposa Dr Dougherty Rd./Monterey Dr. • Study Intersection ~ ~ ~ ~ Project Site Driveway ~ ~ _vM ~ XX AM Peak HourVolume „~ N In li N N (XX) PM Peak Hour Volume ,-' ~ Does not exist with project ~' + ~' + _ _ ill 33 (20) ~ ~'~ 24 (15)-~ ~ -- Future Roadway 24 (15} ~1 0 ~ 66 (38j -~ ~ ~ m :~ Right turn volumes don't N ~ ~; ~ ~ go through intersection '~ o u'v M NORTH PrOJeGt Not to Scale Site 1 11 ~~~ ~~y~ 8TH ST. BRODER BLVD. ~~P~ 12 po0 13 P~ i„-- GLEASON DR. o'tio Nr K '~ 14 ~ o o a O Z ~ 2~ J ~ L ~' ~ S°S • • 4 = C O = 'A~ ~_________________________Z CENTRAL PKWY. ~ ~CF ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ : 1 .°.~ y o ~ In 4y~ SIERRA LN. S~ER~gLt~' $ 7' DUBLIN BLVD. 8 ~ 4 sc, w CT. JOHNSON DR. OWENS DR. 9 10 157-001 T I I S • 5130/06 - DM w~~ ~. !14! -,, ~-an~uo ~ac.ian `onsul~an~_ Long Term Cumulative Conditions This section includes analysis results for 2025 traffic conditions in the study area (buildout under the General Plan), and assumes the development of the potential 180-acre Camp Parks Redevelopment Project (Dublin Crossing). The 180-acre Camp Parks site is a portion of the RFTA site bounded by Scarlett Drive to the west, Dublin Road to the south, Arnold Road to the east and the extension of Central Parkway to the north. At the time of preparation of this report, the most reasonable foreseeable use of the site includes the following mixed-uses: 1,996 residential units, 196,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of retail, 196,000 sq. ft. of campus office, 117,000 sq. ft. of civic uses, plus provisions for open-space and school uses. Dublin Traffic Model (2025) Assumptions The DTM was used for the future 2025 forecasts. A description of the model development is contained in the Buildout (2015) Conditions section of this report. Both the 2015 and 2025 models have similar roadway networks and assume arterial extensions and improvements planned in the Tri Valley Area. However, in addition to the 2015 base network, the following improvements are also included in the 2025 network: • Currently, there is only one access to Camp Parks off Dublin Boulevard. Two gates along Arnold Road are closed for security reasons. Camp Parks plans to relocate the existing Camp Parks access at Dublin Boulevard/Camp Parks Boulevard to the intersection of Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard to form afour-leg intersection. The study assumes that this relocation will be completed by 2025 concurrent with the Camp Parks Redevelopment Project. • The City plans to extend Scarlett Drive from Dougherty Road to Dublin Boulevard. The study assumes that this extension will be completed by 2025. Therefore, Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive is analyzed as a four-leg intersection under 2025 Conditions (Eastern Dublin Tragic Impact Fee Program). • It is assumed that Central Parkway would be extended westerly concurrent with the Camp Parks Redevelopment Project. For this analysis, it was assumed that it would connect with Dougherty Road north of where Scarlett Drive intersects Dougherty Road. The intersection will be limited to a right-in/right-out access. The actual alignment may differ but will be studied as part of future studies for the Camp Parks Redevelopment Project. • The widening of Dougherty Road from four to six lanes between Houston Place and the north City Limits (Eastern Dublin Tragic Impact Fee Program). • As described in the Eastern Dublin Property Owners EIR, the Hacienda Road / I-580 interchange will be widened by adding one lane to the eastbound and westbound off-ramps and one northbound lane to the overcrossing (Eastern Dublin Tragic Impact Fee Program). Figure I I shows the resulting turning movement volumes at the study intersections under the Long Term Cumulative Conditions. Figure 12 shows the lane configurations and traffic controls that are planned/programmed under the City of Dublin Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and which are consistent with the City's Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Program. Page 33 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ~D`~ °~" x(55 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Figure Long Term Cumulative (2025) Conditions Turning Movement Volumes I Intersection I Dougherty Rd.lAmadorVly. Blvd. N N ~_~ N -°'a~ °' ~ 5 (27) ~ °i ° x-:25 (370) ~~~ x;_25(188) 380 (350) r., t ~- 15 (10}~ 597 (395) ~ ~ °o a0 v0 M N N Intersection 6 Hopyard Rd./EB 1-580 Off-Ramp ~ ~ O r: ~ N 920 (880) '~ ~ ~ .! 1,584 (1164)-~ Nrn Intersection 2 erty Rd./Scarlett Dr. 2 `~° ~,~ t u' ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~R ~ e~~~ ~'~~ x`'90 ~ ~ ~ 3v/ no ~ M, =~ Dublin Blvd.lScarlett Dr n (O O O(O f+. ~vv ' ~ ~, ~ ~ R_361 (742) ~--1,987 (2,257) I~ ~ ~- ~ X73 (75) 20 (70) w ~) t ~- 104 (1,830 -- ------ 52 (65;~ ^~n `M ~ O ~ Intersection 12 )ougherty Rd.lN. Mariposa Dr. m ~~ ~' + 3 (6)-y ° c ~o M CV m Intersection 3 herty Rd./Sierra Ln. Intersection 4 Dougherty Rd.lDublin Blvd. io .-.~ ~~ r ~!] N o ^ -L102(62) ~c~im ~-1,650(1,61 a' + L. i~ 324 (780) 175 (264) ~=1! 1,228 (1,4503--- ~ ~-- 394 (580 ~ m ~.n N~~ Intersection 5 Dougherty Rd./WB I-580 Off-RamF 0 * ~ N ~ N t!y ~ ~ ~ ~ 565 (420j ~~ ~ a~~ Ol ~ rr ~ Intersection 10 Hacienda Dr./EB I-580 Off-Ramp Intersection 11 ~gherty Rd./Ventura Dt: m m v~ g (2)~ ~ ~ 00 N 0 ~vN °Nm -L12(32) N~ f-5(6) .rl ~ S- -~ 53 (113) 41 (218)~R*~+ 51 (106-~ CSC N N N Intersection 8 Hacienda Dr./Dublin Blvd. ~ ~ N x.164 (34) "~"-fO ~-1,654(1,134 ~- x710 (575) 170 (255) ~ '-1 f ~/ 564 1,438))-- -----~ 29 (491 ~ ~ ~ ti re{O u~]ON Intersection 13 Dougherty Rd.(S. Mariposa DI•. m ~~ ~..~ ~' + 28 (13)~ R~ 16 (9)-~ vo ~ N ~~ M Project Slte~ ° Relocated ~ Camp Parks 1 r ~ Access ~~O 9 ~~y 8TH ST. ~~°~ 12 ~P~° 13 P 0 ^snI `" 14 ° ° 2 0 ~' ~ scv ~. •'~.- a w c~, w~ ' ~~ 0 S~eRRq~~' 3 7~ DUBLIN BLVD.. ~ 5 ~ ~ ^~ CT ~ JOHNSON DR. 6 ~ OWENS DR. ~a Dr1WB I-580 Off-Ramp W ~i~ ~~ .- ~ O O M ~ v ~~ R 360 (490) r> N ~~ ~ ~ 1,690 (1,305) ~ 1,450 880 ~ ~ ~o ~ 1145 ~599;~ o N ._ ~ ~ (~.~ V..~ V r> ~ ~ V Rch ~~, Intersection 14 LEGEND ;herty Rd./Monterey Dr. rn • Study Intersection 0 Project Site Driveway ~~ XX AM Peak Hour Volume ~+ (XX)PM Peak Hour Volume `(0 ~ RZ ---- Future Roadway 8 14;-~ vo ~ Right turn volumes don't °'~ go through intersection N OJ _ f`7 N O RT H Not to Scale BRODER BLVD. GLEASON DR. d ° 0 z o w ~ U Z CENTRAL PKWY ~ 8 0 ~ 9 10 157-DOITI I S - 417108 - DM ~~~ ~ X5.5 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Figure Long Term Cumulative (2025) Conditions Lane Configurations and ~ 2 Traffic Controls D H Intersection I .y Rd./Amador ~•~ .1 ~ .11 SPLLIT SPLIT ~ J•I~ I I Intersection 6 yard Rd./EB I-580 C w w ~~11 :. ... 1t~, Intersection I I ferry RdJVentura Dr. X111 !r~ 4 'l~ ~~ A~~ Intersection 2 Dougherty Rd./Scarlett Dr. 0 J ~111~• ~' _ ~-`~ I**~IJ w Intersection 7 Dublin Blvd./Scarlett Dr. Overlap ~ ~•~• `~ ~ --. Intersection 12 ~ugherry Rd.iN. Mariposa Dr. Will not exist with projett X11 ~ ~T°? Intersection 3 herry Rd./Sierra Ln. ~11~•, ;J I~~~ Intersection 8 Hacienda Dr/Dublin Blvd. i,- .~111~.. '~'~`~ttt~' -~. OVERLAP Intersection 13 >ougherry Rd./S. Mariposa Dr. x'.11 -~.~tit Project $Ite ~ Relocated / Camp Parks 1 ~/ Access 0 ~ 11 ~4 ~y ~), ~P 8TH ST. op. 12 P~,P~ 13 ~a sP ~' 14 2 0 ~ s~ --'~ z ~. . , u ~ \ ~ O ~ SIERRA LN. / S/ERRA1-~' 3 7' DUBLIN BLVD. 4 3c w a ~~Fr_ ~ o CT. JOHNSON DR. OWENS DR. Intersettion 4 erty Rd./Dublin Blvd. . ~-- Intersection 9 Hacienda Dr./WB I-580 Off• w w .~~11 r ~+ ,.., ttt~` Intersection 14 X11 ~ ..+ '``:tit Intersection 5 Dougherty Rd./WB I-580 Of W ~~~11 ~.. tt~ w tt w Intersection 10 Hacienda Dr./EB I-580 Off- w .~ 111 ::; .. ~ tt~~' ~ w LL LEGEND Dr. • Study Intersection O Project Site Driveway Traffic Signal i Stop Sign -~-Under No Project Conditions ~-- NORTH Not to Stale BRODER BLVD. GLEASON DR. d 0 a 0 z w U CENTRAL PKWY. 8 HACIE/y~ 9 CROSS/~C ~~i 10 it Q Q ra- 157-DOITI IS - 5/30/08 - DM ~~~ ~ ~~5 "~.S"iS~v wdL.i~t"+ .~C1SU;L~ir~., __ Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Long Term Cumulative Conditions "' As previously mentioned, this scenario assumes the development of the potential Camp Parks Redevelopment Project (Dublin Crossing). As a part of the future acquisition of a portion of the ~ RFTA site by a private developer for amixed-use development, the main access to the existing RFTA located at Dublin Boulevard/Camp Parks Boulevard will be relocated to Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard to form the fourth leg of the intersection. Therefore Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard is analyzed as a four-leg intersection. """' Under Long Term Cumulative Conditions with the completion of the planned City of Dublin Capital Improvement Projects, all study intersections are expected to operate at acceptable levels l,, of service except for the following intersections: • Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard is expected to continue to operate unacceptably at LOS E during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Additional improvements to reduce the „~ impacts at the Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard intersection to an acceptable LOS would require adding an exclusive southbound right-turn lane, which requires an additional right-of-way acquisition beyond what is planned for the CIP. Without the additional right-of way, the Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard intersection would operate at an unacceptable level of service. It is recommended that the City monitor the intersection for peak hour volumes on a periodic basis and continue to obtain updated ~ forecasts for future years. Such monitoring should be done to assist the City to comply with General Plan policies requiring implementation of transportation measures to improve levels of service. Additionally, under a reconfigured Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard four-way intersection, a shared eastbound through/left-turn lane and aright-turn lane are required to accommodate ingress for Camp Parks. The eastbound and westbound approaches to the intersection will need to operate with "split" traffic signal phasing because of the shared eastbound through/left-turn lane. As noted in the introduction to this section, this scenario includes adding a fourth leg to , the intersection to accommodate the relocated Camp Parks entrance. In a subsequent f the effects of this relocated entrance. d ~~ e o section to this report, a separate analysis is ma tion would operate acceptably without the fourth i ntersec The analysis shows that this (Camp Parks) leg, with or without the Arroyo Vista project, and the southbound right turn ~~ lane would not be required. wee • Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard is expected to operate unacceptably at LOS E during the p.m. peak hour. No additional lanes beyond those in the current construction project recommended that the City It i s are likely to be feasible due to physical constraints. monitor the intersection for peak hour volumes on a periodic basis and continue to obtain updated forecasts for future years. Such monitoring should be done to assist the City to to comply with General Plan policies requiring implementation of transportation measures nt and future phases of the I-580 Smart ,,,~ improve levels of service. In addition, curre Corridor Project will likely relieve some congestion at the Dougherty Road/Dublin ulevard intersection through Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) measures and B o discourage traffic from diverting off the freeway due to congestion or incidents. Therefore, ~~ the Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection will continue to operate at an unacceptable level of service. .r Page 3 6 Report - Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development f onuary 7, 2009 I i ~'4r ~ rCtriJ4~':~R :avian • ft should be noted that eastbound motorists exiting the project driveways along Dougherty Road are expected to experience significant delays due to minimal gaps in traffic needed for safe turns. Table VII summarizes peak hour levels of service at all study intersections under Long Term Cumulative Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix I. Table VII: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Long Term Cumulative Conditions ID Signalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour V / C LOS V / C LOS I Dougherty Road / Amador Valley Boulevard 0.91 E 0.95 E 2 Dougherty Road /Scarlett Drive 0.57 A 0.73 C 3 Dougherty Road /Park Sierra 0.70 B 0.52 A 4 Dougherty Road /Dublin Boulevard 0.80 C 0.94 E 5 Dougherty Road /Westbound I-580 off-ramp 0.55 A 0.78 C 6 Hopyard Road /Eastbound I-580 off-ramp 0.87 D 0.88 D 7 Dublin Boulevard /Scarlett Drive 0.78 C 0.81 D 8 Hacienda Drive /Dublin Boulevard 0.87 D 0.82 D 9 Hacienda Drive /Westbound I-580 off-ramp 0.88 D 0.75 C 10 Hacienda Drive /Eastbound I-580 off-ramp 0.81 D 0.71 C (~ Unsignalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS I I Dougherty Road / Ventura Drive 0.3(120+) A(F) 0.0(35.6) A(E) 12 Dougherty Road / N. Mariposa Drive 0. I (68.3) A(F) 0.1(31.8) A(D) 13 Dougherty Road / S. Mariposa Drive 3.1(I 20+) A(F) 0.3(38.4) A(E) 14 Dougherty Road /Monterey Drive ------------------ 0. I (30.0) ------------- A(D) ------------------- 0.2(16.8) -------------- AI V / C =Volume-to-capacity ratio for overall signalized intersection X (X) =Intersection level of service (Level of service for the minor approach) X.X (X.X) =Average delay in seconds per vehicle overall one-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) intersection (Delay in seconds per vehicle to minor approach) Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS conditions Page 3 7 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Visto Housing Development January 7, 2009 -~~: ~~ a~sa.~r-a~ian .. ~~n;uitant Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions '~` This scenario is similar to Long Term Cumulative Conditions, but with the addition of net project traffic to assess any traffic impacts at the study intersections. Figure 13 shows the resulting turning !~ movement volumes at the study intersections under 2025 conditions. Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions Table VIII summarizes peak hour levels of service at all study intersections under Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix J. ,,., Table VIII shows little or no change in intersection performance compared with Table VII for a study intersections, because the project is expected to add minimal net trips to the roadway ~ network. The intersections of Dougherty Road /Amador Valley Boulevard, Dublin Boulevard / Dougherty Road and Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa driveway will continue to operate at unacceptable LOS E or worse after the construction of improvements programmed under the ~ City's Capital Improvement Program, funded by Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fees. Details of these three intersections follow: `~" • As noted in the Long Term Cumulative scenario, the intersection of Dougherty ~ Road/Amador Valley Boulevard operates at an unacceptable LOS E condition during both the a.m. and p.m. peak periods. With project traffic added, the v/c rating stays the same in the morning (0.91) and increases by 0.01 to 0.96 in the p.m. period. However, as noted previously, this intersection will operate acceptably until and if the Camp Parks entrance is "" relocated as the fourth leg. ~~ Impact TR-4 The assumed relocation of the Camp Parks access onto Dougherty Road opposite Amador Valley Road results in the Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard-Camp Parks intersection operating at an unacceptable LOS E during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under Long-term Cumulative (2025) Conditions. The addition of project traffic would exacerbate this condition. This impact is significant. Mitigation Measure TR-4 The Long-term Cumulative scenario assumes that the Dougherty Road Improvement CIP project is ~~' complete. Additional intersection modifications required to improve operations to LOS D or .~ better include the addition of a southbound right-turn lane and modification of the traffic signal ! system to accommodate split phasing for the eastbound and westbound approaches. It should be noted that if Camp Parks access is not relocated opposite Amador Valley Boulevard, then this significant project impact will not occur. Even with the relocation of access to this location, the City will not have the authority to require the Army to construct improvements to the Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard intersection. Therefore, the potential impact remains significant and unavoidable. It is recommended that the City monitor the intersection for ""~ peak hour volumes on a periodic basis and continue to obtain updated forecasts for future years. Such monitoring should be done to assist the City to comply with General Plan policies requiring implementation of transportation measures to improve levels of service. "~' • The unacceptable conditions at the intersection of Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard are exacerbated by the Arroyo Vista project. No additional lanes beyond those in the current construction project are likely to be feasible due to physical constraints. Therefore, the ~' impacts are significant and unavoidable. Page 38 Report - Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Januory 7, 2009 -~~: `~-anss~a!-~,.~tiar ~.~nsuit~nt~. __ Impact TR-5 Under Long-term Cumulative (2025) Conditions, the Dublin Boulevard/Dougherty Road intersection would operate at an unacceptable LOS E during the p.m. peak hour. The addition of project traffic will exacerbate this condition. This impact is significant. Mitigation Measure TR-5 A CIP project is near complete at the Dublin Boulevard/Dougherty Road intersection. Businesses were relocated and right-of-way was acquired to accommodate the improvements, which include the addition of a third northbound left-turn lane, a third northbound through lane, two exclusive northbound right-turn lanes, a second eastbound left-turn lane, a third eastbound through lane, a second eastbound right-turn lane, a fourth southbound through lane, a third westbound left-turn lane, and a third westbound through lane. These improvements are assumed complete under the Short-term Cumulative and long-term Cumulative scenarios. To improve operations in the future to LOS D or better during the p.m. peak hour, a fourth northbound left-turn lane would be required. This modification is considered not feasible because of the potential safety implication of such a configuration. This impact remains significant and unavoidable. i The City shall continue to monitor the operation at this intersection on a periodic basis. Such monitoring will assist the City to comply with General Plan policies requiring implementation of transportation measures to improve levels of service. Current and future phases of the I-580 Smart Corridor Project will likely relieve some congestion at the Dublin Boulevard/Dougherty Road intersection through Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) measures and discourage traffic from diverting off of the freeway due to congestion or incidents. ' Eastbound motorists exiting the Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa driveway are expected to experience excessive delays due to minimal gaps in traffic. Impact TR-6 Under Long-term Cumulative (2025) Conditions, side-street traffic on S. Mariposa driveway at Dougherty Road experiences unacceptable LOS F conditions during the a.m. peak hour and LOS E conditions during the p.m. peak hour. The addition of project traffic would exacerbate this condition. This impact would be significant ~` Mitigation Measure TR-6 s Signalization of the S. Mariposa driveway/Dougherty Road intersection would improve operations to LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS A during the p.m. peak hour. This improvement would bring the impact to aless-than-significant level. Poge 39 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 boo ~- q55 City of Dublin -Traffic Study forArroyoVista Housing Development Long Term Cumulative (2025) Plus Project Conditions Turning Movement Volumes Intersection I ~ Rd./AmadorVly. Blvd. ~-'-• ,`S; °i ° F25 (370) ~i~y x_25{188) 380 (350) ~ t ?- 15 (10)~ ~ o ~ 597 (406) ~ ~ ~ v v ~.o MMO Intersection 6 ovard Rd./EB I-580 Off-F ~v nr ~ ~ ~' 921 (887}~ *?~ 1,584 (1164) Mrn 1~ C7 ~R ~~ d N %K ettion I I Rd.Nentura Dr. ~~ M N ~~ f 24 (15)-~ 8~ ~~ N v N 7 i ~l 9~ A ~~ Intersettion 2 Dougherty Rd./Scarlett Dr. _m ~"= a ~~ a° ~ih (D N (~l `~ ~ 8s~~o~~`~i • ~ ~w R ! 9J J %rn m rn ~o •-o N'-'tO N Intersection 7 Dublin Blvd./Scarlett Dr. -,o m r- o cn r~ , v'"-, o N r"i ; ~ 361 (742) ~"'" r` '~--1,988 (2,269) s ~ ~' -~ 73 (75) 20(71)~~t~ 105 (1.830)- ~~,n 52 (65) ~ ~ ~ ~, `-_M'- O) 7 O Intersection 12 Dougherty Rd./N. Mariposa Dr. Does not exist with project Intersection 3 herty Rd./Sierra Ln. N v~--- ~[T N m ~ 12 (32) Nr F5(6) I~~~~- - 53(113) 41 (113),( 2 (8)i~T~ 51 (106) ~~~ ln~M N cl'~ N Intersection 8 Hacienda Dr./Dublin Blvd. N `~°a v ~ 164 (34) "'~`O (1,654(1,139) I~ ~ ~ - 710 (575) 171 (255) ~ ~I 569 (1,439)-- ~ 293 (492) ~{ ~ m C ~ ~ O ~ O N Intersection 13 Dougherty Rd./S. Mariposa Dr. 0 a~ o~ ;.~ u) Nl ~~ 33 (20)_~ ~ 66 (38)-~ ~ o (`~') N f`7 Project d Relocated Site ~ /camp Parks 1 ~/ Access 11 Intersection 4 erty Rd./Dublin Blvd. c~ ..i~ o `v ~ ~ 102 (72) ~cvm ~-1,650 (1,670) I~ ~ ~ 1324 (780) 175(284) ~i ~ 1,228 (1,450) -- ~ ~ o 394 (58D)~{ a> rn ~~ ~~m N Intersection 9 Hacienda Dr./WB I-580 Off-Ramp 'To r_ o~ ~'i X16904(10.305) =rn N ~ ~~ t~1 O ~ M Intersection 14 v Et° N N ~~ 24 (15)~ N_ M o") Q N O RT H No: tc Scale ~,O ~~6 8TH ST. BRODER BLVD. ~~ ~~P~ 12 0 PO 1$ P~ GLEASON DR. f o~ ° ° o ' 14 ~ _ a 2 0 ? °~ z U w 9~ ••___ _______ --------- _____~ CENTRAL PKWY. ~ ~ j ~, ~ ' `~ O o SIERRALN.•~ a SIER ~~ , 7 ~ DUBLIN BLVD B / kAL 3 . ~~ 4 s ~, 5 CT. JOHNSON DR. ~~~ OWENS DR. 9 10 Figure 13 Intersection 5 )ougherry Rd.lWB I-580 Off-Ra r~ ~` ~ ~~ 6+ ~ m ~ ~ 589(901) ~ ~ ~ 565 (420) v c° ~= r ~i M ~ f7 f ~k Intersection 10 Hacienda Dr./EB I-580 Off-Rs ~~ ~o M N L 1.450 (880) 1,146 (600)- .o ~ ~ ~~ NI '-' M ~ lf) ~ L7 LEGEND Dr. ~ Study Intersection ~ Project Site Driveway XX AM Peal< HourVolume (XX)PM Peak HourVolume ---- Future Roadway ~; Right turn volumes don go through intersection 157-001 T I I S - 4/7/08 • DM -}~; t ~"7FiS;;p ~i:-elOr4 ~~. on: u ita.rn~. Table VI11: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions Long Term Cumulative Conditions Long Term Cumulative + Project Conditions ID Signalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour V/ C LOS V/ C LOS V/ C LOS V/ C LOS I Dougherty Road. / Amador Valley Boulevard 0.91 E 0.95 E 0.91 E 0.96 E 2 Dougherty Road /Scarlett Drive 0.57 A 0.73 C 0.58 A 0.75 C 3 Dougherty Road /Park Sierra 0.7 B 0.52 A 0.71 C 0.53 A 4 Dougherty Road /Dublin Boulevard 0.8 C 0.94 E 0.81 D 0.95 E 'S Dougherty Road /Westbound I-580 off-ramp 0.55 A 0.78 C 0.55 B 0.79 C 6 Hopyard Road /Eastbound I-580 off-ramp 0.87 D 0.88 D 0.87 D 0.88 D 7 Dublin Boulevard /Scarlett Drive 0.78 C 0.81 D 0.78 C 0.81 D 8 Hacienda Drive /Dublin Boulevard 0.87 D 0.82 D 0.87 D 0.82 D 9 Hacienda Drive /Westbound I-580 off-ramp 0.88 D 0.75 C 0.88 D 0.75 C 10 Hacienda Drive /Eastbound 1-580 off-ramp 0.81 D 0.71 C 0.81 D 0.72 C ID Unsignalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS I I Dougherty Road / Ventura Drives 0.3(120+) A(F) 0.0(35.6) A(E) 0.1(27.8) A(D) 0.1(16.8) A(C) 12 Dougherty Road / N. Mariposa Driven 0. I (68.3) A(F) 0. I (31.8) A(D) - _ _ 13 Dougherty Road / S. Mariposa Drives --------------- - -- - With tragic signals as mitigation3 3.1 120+ ------------ - A F ---- - - 0.3 38.4 ----------- - A E ---- - 7.1 120+ _ --- --- 0.6 A F ------ B I.0 38.8 --------- - -- 0.45 A E - -- A 14 N Dougherty Road /Monterey Drive ~ otes: LOS =Level of SP PVI!'P 0. I (30.0) A(D) 0.2(16.8) A(C) 0. I (I 9.2) A(C) 0. I (I 3.8) A(B) V / C =Volume-to-capacity ratio for overall signalized intersection X (X) =Intersection level of service (Level of service for the minor approach) X.X (X.X) =Average delay in seconds per vehicle overall one-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) intersection (Delay in seconds per vehicle to minor approach) Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS conditions ~ Reconfigured driveway under project conditions; intersection limited to right-in/right-out with the project. Zlntersection does not exist with project 3Performance measure is V / C Page 4 I Report - Tro~c Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Jonuory 7, 2009 Ip I a ~~ ~ ~5 "'~ ~u, -~4,r. ~. <...~rr~r-~cio- ~cr~sui~ar~> 0 Alameda County CMP Land Use Analysis Program The recently updated Countywide Transportation Demand Model (CMA Model) was used to forecast traffic volumes for the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) Analysis. Unlike the Dublin Traffic Model (DTM), which is a refinement of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) model (see the Dublin Traffic Model section of this Traffic Report for a detailed description of the model), the CMA model has a more regional focus, larger traffic analysis zones, less elaborate street network, and fewer centroid connectors within the Tri-Valley area. The CMA model volumes were used to analyze the Short Term Cumulative (2015) Conditions and Long Term Cumulative. (2030) Conditions, as indicated below. MTS Arterial impacts Table IX summarizes the results of the analysis of Project impacts on various segments of Dublin ~ Boulevard, Tassajara Road, San Ramon Road, and Dougherty Road in the study area. The analysis .consists of measuring LOS on these roadway segments during the p.m. peak hour under Short Term Cumulative (2015) Conditions and Long Term Cumulative (2030) Conditions with and ~ without the Project. The LOS results are based on the volume-to-capacity ratio for roadway segments. As shown in Table IX, all study roadway segments are expected to operate at acceptable levels of '"' service (LOS E or better) in the p.m. peak hour under 2015 and 2030 conditions with and without ~,,. the Project, except the following roadway segments: Dublin Boulevard • Between Dougherty Road and Hacienda Drive -eastbound direction • Between Dougherty Road and Village Parkway -both eastbound and westbound directions (LOS F) under 2030 conditions San Ramon Road • Between I-580 and Amador Valley Boulevard -northbound direction. As shown in the table, there are virtually no increases in v/c with the addition of Project volumes, which is minimal (i.e. less than one percent) compared with the projected volumes without the project. Therefore, because the project contribution is not more than two percent on these segments, the Project will have no significant impact on the MTS arterial system in the vicinity of the Project under Short Term Cumulative (2015) and Long Term Cumulative (2030) Conditions. r Page 42 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ~~~~ ar,s~;:,s°cacior: ~onsui~ants Table IX: Year 2015 and Year 2030 PM Ppalr 1-L,~~r MTC e.-~e..;~i i e.,e~~ ,s e.._.:__ ~ ~ Year 2015 No Year 2015 plus Year 2030 No Year 2030 plus Location a ~ u o Project Project # of « ~ Project Project c o P.M. P.M. Lanes a P.M. P M ~ U Peak V/C LOS Peak V/C LOS V Peak V/C LOS . . Peak V/C LOS Volume Volume Volume Volume Dublin Boulevard Between Hacienda Drive and Tassajara Road Eastbound --------------- 3 ---- 3.000 --------- 2,269 0.76 C - ------------- 2,271 0.76 C 3 3,000 2,429 0.81 D 2,431 0.81 D Westbound 3 3,000 --------- -- 216 0.07 A ------------------------- 221 0.07 A --- 3 ------- 3,000 ------------------------ 382 0.13 A ------------------------ 387 0.13 A Between Dougherty Road and Hacienda Drive _Eastbound 3 - 3,000 ------- 1,862 0.62 B --------------- 1,864 0.62 B 3 3,000 3,059 1.02 F 3,061 1.02 F Westbound 3 3,000 --- 1,360 0.45 A -------------------- 1,360 0.45 A ------ 3 --- 3,000 --- ---------------- 2,869 0.96 E - 2,869 0.96 E Between Dougherty Road and Village Parkway Eastbound -------------- 3 --- 3.000 --- 2,303 0.77 C ------------------- 2,320 0.77 C 3 3,000 3,045 1.02 F 3,062 1.02 F Westbound 3 3,000 ----- 2,234 0.74 C ---------------- 2,238 0.75 C -------- 3 --------- 3,000 -------------------- 3,039 1.01 F ---------------------- 3,043 1.01 F Tassajara Road Between I-580 and Dublin Boulevard Northbound ------------- 4 ---- 4,000 --------- 975 0.24 A --------------- 977 0.24 A 4 4,000 2,007 0.50 A 2,009 0.50 A Southbound 4 4,000 --- 961 0.24 A ---------------------- 964 0.24 A ----- 4 ------- 4,000 ----------------------- 1,652 0.41 A --------------------------- 1,655 0.41 A Between Dublin Boulevard and Gleason Drive Norchbound 3 3,000 1,022 0.34 A 1,022 0.34 A 3 3,000 1,742 0.58 A 1,742 0.58 A Southbound 3 3,000 701 0.23 A ------------------------ 701 0.23 A ------ 3 ---- 3,000 ----------------- 1,058 0.35 A 1,058 0.35 A North of Gleason Drive _Norchbound 3 -- 3,000 --------- 932 0.31 A --------------------------- 932 0.31 A 3 3,000 1,669 0.56 A 1,669 0.56 A Southbound 3 3,000 471 0.16 A --------------------- ------ - 472 0.16 A ------ 3 -------- 3,000 ------------------------- 729 0.24 A ------------------------ 730 0.24 A San Ramon Road Between 1-580 and Amodor Valley Boulevard Northbound 3 3,000 3,154 1.05 F -------- 3,154 1.05 F 3 3.000 4,409 1.47 F 4,409 1.47 F Southbound 3 3,000 1,763 0.59 A ----------------- 1,763 0.59 A ------ 3 ------- 3,000 ---------------- 2,404 0.80 D --------------- -- - 2,404 0.60 D Dougherty Road Between I-580 and Dublin Boulevard Northbound 4 4,000 2,965 0.74 C 2,986 0.75 C 4 4,000 2,965 0.74 C 2,986 0.75 C Southbound 4 4,000 2,003 0.50 A --- 2,017 0.50 A ------- 4 --------- 4,000 ------------------------ 2,120 0.53 A 2,134 0.53 A Nnta• Rnl rl veL,o o inai.-... .............._-_u _ i ~r --~-- Page 43 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Januory 7, 2009 -~~~ ~" ~ an~:oor;.~~iar: .,..OriSU3iurT:= ~~~ ~ X55 EreewaylState Highway Impacts As required by the 2007 CMP, Project impacts on I-580, I-680, and SR-84 were analyzed based on freeway capacity standards described in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. Tables X and XI summarize the results of the analysis of Project impacts on various segments of I-580, I-680 and SR-84 in the vicinity of the Project. The analysis consists of measuring the levels of service on these freeway and State highway segments during the p.m. peak hour under Short Term Cumulative (20 15) Conditions and .Long Term Cumulative (2030) Conditions with and without the Project. The LOS analysis is based on the volume-to-capacity ratio for basic freeway sections and multilane highways. As shown in Tables X and XI, specific segments of I-580 and I-680 are expected to operate at LOS F in the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour under 2015 and 2030 conditions with and without the Project. ` SR-84 south of I-580 is expected to operate at acceptable LOS C or better in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under 2015 conditions with and without the Project, as shown in Table X. Also, SR-84 south of I-580 is expected to operate at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour under 2030 conditions with and without the Project, as shown in Table XI With the Project trips added to No Project mainline freeway volumes and SR-84; projected LOS on I-580, I-680, and SR-84 would remain unchanged. Therefore, because the project contribution is not more than two percent on these segments, the Project will have no s~nificant impact on freeway and state highway facilities in the vicinity of the Project under 2015 and 2030 conditions. Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Page 44 January 7, 2009 a ~ 15 °-~--~ ~ 5 _~1_~, ;-a~s~ or;,a;i~r: ~ansuwants Table X: Short Term Cumulative (2015) Conditions Freeway Analysis Year 2015 (No Project) Year 2015 plus Project a. o A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Number of Lanes o Peak VIC LOS Peak VIC LOS Peak VIC LOS Volume VIC LO U v_,..~_ Vnlume Volume -580, East of I-680 230 8 03 1 F Eastbound 4 8,000 5,089 0.64 C 8,230 1.03 F 5,089 0.64 C _ _ _ _ _ . Westbound 5 10,000 11,169 1.12 F 5,879 0.59 C 11,185 1.12 F 5,886 0.59 C 1-580, Dougherty Road to Hacienda Drive 856 10 84 0 D Eastbound 6 + aux. 13,000 6,365 0.49 B 10,854 0.83 D 6,373 _ 0.49 _ _B _ _ , _ . Westbound 4 + aux. ---- 9,000 ----- 9,457 ------ 1.05 F ---- 5,974 0.66 C 9,457 1.05 F 5,975 0.66 C -580, Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road 989 10 10 1 F Eastbound 5 10,000 4,253 0.43 B 10,988 1.10 F 4,261 _ 0.43 _ _B _ , _ . _ - Westbound 4 + aux. 9,000 8,391 0.93 E 4,293 0.48 B 8,391 0.93 E 4,295 0.48 B -580, Tassajara Road to Fallon Road 026 I I I F '- Eastbound 4 + aux. 9,000 4,469 0.50 B 10,025 I.I I F 4,476 _ 0.50 _ _B _10, . _ _ _ Westbound 4 + aux. 9,000 10,082 1.12 F 4,594 0.51 B t 0,082 1.12 F 4,597 0.51 B -580, Fallon Road to Airway Boulevard 136 1 13 F Eastbound 4 + aux. 9,000 4, 181 0.46 B 10, 135 I.13 F 4,186 _ 0.47 _ _B _I0, . _ _ _ Westbound 4 + aux. 9,000 11,891 1.32 F 4,320 0.48 B 11,891 1.32 F 4,323 0.48 B 1-680, Alcosta Boulevard to I-580 360 92 0 D Northbound 4 8,000 5,853 0.73 C 7,359 0.92 D 5,853 _ 0.73 _ C _ _ 7, _ . _ Southbound ---- 4 ---- 8,000 ---- 7,213 ------ 0.90 D 5,473 0.68 C 7,213 0.90 D 5,480 0.69 -680, South of 1-580 272 38 1 F Northbound 3 6,000 4,041 0.67 C 8,272 1.38 F 4,041 _ 0.67 _ C _ _ 8_ . _ _ Southbound 3 + aux. 7,000 6,583 0.94 E 4,23 I 0.60 C 6,585 0.94 E 4,232 0.60 C SR 84, South of I-580 Northbound 2 4,000 2,524 0.63 C 1,762 0.44 B 2,524 0.63 C _ 1,762_ _ 0.44 _ B_ Southbound 2 --- 4,000 ----- 2,260 ------ 0.57 C ----- 2,345 0.59 C 2,260 0.57 C 2,345 0.59 C S 1985 H hway C i apacity Manual, Table 3-I, Levels of Service for Basic Freeway Sections g ource: Maximum Service Flow rate for freeway segments=2000 vehicl eslhr/lane , aux. =Auxilia ry Lane If number of lanes on freeway segment= N+aux., capacity of segment= ( N*2000+1000) vehicles/hr For SR-84, Table 7-I, LOS Criteria for Multilane Highways (1985 HCM) was used assuming a capacity of 2,000 vehicles/hr/lane Note: Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS condition s Page 45 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 a~~ ~- a55 t tj\I•i ~.~nsultar3~ Table XI: Long Term GumulativP r~nam r.,.,a:*:,,..~ c ............. ~ __~___:_ Yeor 1030 (No Project) Yeor 2030 plus Project Number of Lones a A.M. P.M. A.M. P M . U Peak V/C LOS Peak V/C LOS Peak V/C LOS . Peak V/C LOS Volume Volume Volume Volume 1-580, East of I-680 Eastbound ----- 4 ---- 8,000 ---- 6,464 ----- 0.81 - D 9,960 1-25 F 6,464 0.81 D 9,960 1.25 F Westbound 5 10,000 15,708 -- 1.57 _ _ F _ _ 6,674 - 0.67 -- C ----- 15,724 --- 1.57 -- F ----- 6,681 --- 0.67 -- C 1-580, Dougherty Road to Hacienda Drive Eastbound ----- 6 + aux. ---- 13,000 ---- 8,016 _ ---- 0.62 C 12,590 0.97 E 8,024 0.62 C 12,592 0.97 E Westbound 4 + aux. 9,000 13,864 _ 1.54 _ _ F _ - 7,066 --- 0.79 -- D 13,864 1.54 F 7,067 0.79 D 1-580, Hacienda Drive to Tassajara Road Eastbound ----- 5 ---- 10,000 ---- 6,520 ----- 0.65 - C 12,027 1.20 F 6,528 0.65 C 12,028 1.20 F Westbound 4 + aux. 9,000 12,73 I -- 1.41 _ _ F _ - 6,351 --- 0.71 -- C 12,731 1.41 F 6,353 0.71 C -580, Tassajara Road to Fallon Road Eastbound ----- 4 + aux. ---- 9,000 ---- 6,344 ----- 0.70 -- C 12,479 1.39 F 6,351 0.71 C 12,480 1.39 F Westbound 4 + aux. 9,000 14,490 - 1.61 _ _ F _ - 6,708 --- 0.75 -- C 14,490 1.61 F 6,71 I 0.75 C -580, Fallon Road to Airway Boulevard Eastbound ---- 4 + aux. ---- 9,000 ---- 6,632 ----- 0.74 --- C 12,972 1.44 F 6,637 0.74 C 12,973 1.44 F Westbound 4 + aux. 9,000 15,720 1.75 _ _ F _ - 6,429 --- 0.71 -- C 15,720 1.75 F 6,432 0.71 C 1-680, Alcosta Boulevard to I-580 Northbound ----- 4 ---- 8,000 ---- 6,646 ----- 0.83 -- D 9,028 1.13 F 6,646 0.83 D 9,029 1.13 F Southbound 4 8,000 9,591 - 1.20 _ -- F - - 5,982 --- 0.75 -- C 9,591 1.20 F 5,989 0.75 C -680, South of I-580 Northbound 3 6,000 3,791 0.63 _ C 10,095 1.68 F 3,791 0.63 C 10,095 1.68 F Southbound 3 + aux. 7,000 8,683 1.24 _ F _ 4,5 I I 0.64 C 8,685 1.24 F 4,512 0.64 C SR 84, South of I-580 Northbound ---- 2 ---- 4,000 ---- 3,753 0.94 -------- E 3,198 0.80 D 3,753 0.94 E 3, 198 0.80 D Southbound 2 4,000 - 3,549 0.89 _ - E _ ---- 2,965 0.74 -- D ---- 3,549 0.89 E 2,965 0.74 D Cnnrro• I ORS LJf.,0. .. . !".. M__.._i T_u _ -i --r--^i ..-.•- • ~~,~ ~- , c.cw v, aci vi~c ivi oas~c rreeWdy J2CLIOnS Maximum Service Flow rate for freeway segments=2000 vehicles/hr/lane, aux. =Auxiliary Lane If number of lanes on freeway segment= N+aux., capacity of segment= (N~`2000+1000) vehicles/hr For SR-84, Table 7-I, LOS Criteria for Multilane Highways (1985 HCM) was used assuming a capacity of 2,000 vehicles/hr/lane Note: Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS conditions Page 46 Report - Tro~c Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 wa -li: `, ~^an~~ ~~tci~r~ yo;~suican_<• Transit System Impacts BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) The potential impacts of the proposed project on BART were evaluated by estimating increased ridership from the project. Future ridership projections developed for the Eastern Dublin EIR were based on the assumption that the existing East Dublin/Pleasanton station would be the only station located in the Tri-Valley area. However, it is expected that the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART station, currently under construction, would also be available in the Tri-Valley area by the time the proposed project is constructed. Riders generated by the residential uses were calculated based on the methodology used in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Dublin Transit Center Quly 2001). For the Transit Center, it is assumed that 32.1 percent of households would use BART since the residential portion of that project is located near the Transit Center area (Draft EIR for Dublin Transit Center, SCH No. 20001 120395 [July 2001], available at the City of Dublin). However, since the proposed project would not be in the immediate vicinity of a BART station, it is assumed that approximately two percent of the project households would commute by BART. This assumption is consistent with current BART ridership estimates within the Tri-Valley area containing the cities of Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, and part of San Ramon. Approximately seven new riders from ': the proposed project are expected to use BART, calculated as follows: Residential: 378 minus 50 senior units= 328 dwelling units x Irider/unit x 2% x 2 trips per day =approximately 14 trips/day (7 riders inbound to BART during the a.m. peak hour/ 7 riders outbound from BART during the p.m. peak hour) Currently, BART runs four 8-car trains to/from the Dublin/Pleasanton Station per hour during peak commute hours. The average number of annual weekday entries/exits at the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station is approximately 6,500. The West Dublin BART station currently under construction is projected to have approximately 6,000 daily entries/exits on its opening day in 2009 (BART.gov). Each BART train has a capacity of 560 seats, which translates into 2,240 seats during the peak hour. At this station, approximately I ,063 riders enter the station and 325 riders exit the station (total of 1,388 riders) during the a.m. peak hour. BART assumes a maximum load capacity of 1.35 persons per seat during the peak commute periods to account for sitting and standing passengers. During the p.m: peak hour, BART ridership at the station is lower, with a total of 1,266 riders (entering and exiting). Adding seven more entering riders during the a.m. peak hour would result in 1,070 riders traveling in the peak commute direction (westbound). With the added ridership from the proposed project, the resulting load capacity would be 0.48 persons per seat (1,070 riders/2,240 seats), which is below BART's maximum load capacity. During the p.m. peak hour, the load capacity would be even lower with the additional eight riders generated by the proposed project. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated for the BART system. This analysis is conservative in that it assumes that all of the potential riders would use BART during the peak hour of the morning and evening commutes. Page 47 Report - 7raf~ic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ~~~~ ~ X55 -ii:i ranapor~cior~ Consuiranr~ LAVTA (Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority) -Wheels TJKM estimated the number of daily riders expected to originate from the proposed project and use Wheels service. Assuming that two percent of project residents use Wheels transit, project ridership is calculated as follows: 328 dwelling units x 2% x 2 trips/day =approximately 13 daily riders. This ridership figure is conservative in that it assumes no discount for riders from the existing Arroyo Vista housing. Several Wheels bus routes currently provide service to East Dublin, including lines 3, 12, 12X, I OA, I A, I B, and 20X, which can be used by residents to connect to BART and ACE services to the South Bay. It is expected that LAVTA would continue to provide services after the site is redeveloped. It is also expected that LAVTA would provide sufficient capacity to accommodate riders as needed. ' ACE (Altamont Commuter Express) Train Providing commuter rail service from Stockton to San Jose, ACE train serves the Tri-Valley with one stop in Livermore and another at Pleasanton. ACE currently operates four round trips per day. Based on available data, ACE annual ridership is approximately 600,000. Ridership peaked in 2001 at approximately 930,000 (2006 MTC Statistical Summary of Bay Area Transit Operations). There are no significant impacts anticipated for the ACE system since the project is expected to marginally contribute riders to ACE train loading and ample capacity exists on the ACE system. On site Bus Circulation Options The proposed site plan was reviewed to determine bus circulation impacts resulting from reconfiguring the driveways connecting to Dougherty Road. Currently, Wheels bus Lines 3 and 202(school days only) provide direct service to the existing Arroyo Vista housing site from Dougherty Road with a counterclockwise loop via North Mariposa Drive that exits from South Mariposa Drive to Dougherty Road. The bus stop is located near the existing basketball court on the west side of South Mariposa Drive across from the tot lot. North Mariposa Drive will be removed with the redevelopment of the Arroyo Vista project site. .~ The removal of this roadway together with the proposed eastbound left-turn restriction at the "~' Dougherty Road / Ventura Drive intersection will impact bus circulation, especially for northbound operations. Additionally, the proposed layout of the site plan will require northbound buses to `~ make various maneuvers to exit the project site. Various options for alternate circulation have been examined. For the southbound direction, the bus can be rerouted to enter the site further north via Ventura Drive and continue via Public Street B to serve the existing bus stop. This routing also allows the addition of another bus stop just south of Ventura Drive on Public Street B to serve residents in "'~ the north end of the development. Alternatively, for the southbound direction the route can stay on Dougherty Road with a bus pullout or stop on Dougherty Road. The northbound routing is more problematic and TJKM has developed and assessed four northbound bus circulation options to address the impact. The benefits and drawbacks of each option are discussed as follows. The bus circulation options are shown in Figure 14. ,~, w, Poge 48 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Bus Circulation Options Site Plan (Northern Portion) ~~ 40 ~ ~ ~~ U \.:.. O U ~~ LEGEND •••••»•• Southbound Route Northbound Route Options -•••• IA (same as IB within the site) --- IB -•- 2 ............. 3 ~~ 4 4 Possible Bus Stop Location Q Existing Bus Stop ~~ ~~ s ~~ >- i; L U O E / J a -~-~ 0 < ~~ r ; ~~ '~Q^~ ~ v:" m ~~~~ ~~ i, ,~ i ~ --. , ~ /,~ r `~~ •~•1 ~ . .~ ~34. ~~ Figure 14 O a a ~' 1 'T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 i 14 I- li 1 1 'I Ii 1 Ii I 1. 'I 1 1 'I 1 I 1 Ii 1 1~ ~- NORTH Not to Scale 157.001 - 4/ 14/08 - DM Sao ~- X55 - li,! t ~"d IZS:7~""47itOi? ....0(tSt3it~TiTa' Option I A: Operate via a northbound left turn from Dougherty Road at South Mariposa Drive, right turn at Public Loop, with a new northbound bus stop at the senior housing building; continue via Public Street B, with an optional additional stop just south of Ventura Drive, then right turn onto Ventura Drive and another right turn to Dougherty Road, into a new southbound left turn pocket to be created, and make a U-turn onto northbound Dougherty Road. Anew traffic signal is required with protected northbound left phasing and a protected southbound U-turn phasing. Analysis: Option IA allows northbound bus service to continue serving the site, with better service via the additional Ventura Drive bus stop. The required distance for merging from Ventura Drive across three lanes of traffic was evaluated and determined to be approximately 295 feet, based on the formula (L = 6o where L =design length, w =width of the road, and s =the speed of the vehicle). The distance from Ventura Drive to South Mariposa Drive is approximately 750 feet, which is adequate for a bus travelling at an average speed of 20 miles per hour (mph) to merge into the southbound left turn lane. However, it requires the bus to make a U-turn which is an uncommon practice for in-service buses and would be very uncomfortable for passengers in full-length (40-foot) bus coaches, particularly when they are standing. Also the existing pavement width of 24 feet for northbound Dougherty Road is inadequate for a standard 40-foot bus coach to make a U-turn. This option is therefore not recommended. Option I B: Operate a northbound left turn from Dougherty Road at South Mariposa Drive, right turn at Public Loop, with a new northbound bus stop across from the senior housing building; continue via Public Street B, with an optional stop just south of Ventura Drive, right turn onto Ventura Drive, and a left turn to Dougherty Road. This option maintains the intersection as a full access intersection, as opposed to Option 4, which is eastbound right-in/right-out and northbound left-in access. Ana~sis: Option I B allows northbound bus service to continue serving the site, with better service via the additional Ventura Drive bus stop, as well as the most direct way back to northbound Dougherty Road without backtracking. However, without a traffic signal, eastbound motorists on Ventura Drive will experience intolerable delay exceeding 50 seconds under the Long Term cumulative traffic conditions. Installing a traffic signal would solve the problem. However, this intersection is approximately 520 feet south of the Amador Valley Boulevard intersection, and does not meet the City of Dublin General Plan's 750 feet minimum spacing criteria for signalized intersections. Therefore, this option would be in non-compliance with the General Plan, and is not recommended. Option 2: Operate via a northbound left turn from Dougherty Road at South Mariposa Drive, right turn at Public Loop, and serve the stop at the senior housing building. Create a clockwise circular one-way bus only lane through the site of the proposed tot lot to connect with South Mariposa Drive to allow a left turn via South Mariposa Drive to continue northbound on Dougherty Road. Anew traffic signal is required with protected northbound left-turn phasing to enter the site. Page 50 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development fonuary 7, 2009 ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~-~= ~~ 55 -~~~~~ . ran,norta;t;sr ~onsulcar3~~ Ana. lysis: This option removes the tot lot which needs to be relocated elsewhere on the property due to safety concerns. It also requires removal of historic redwood trees which may trigger historic preservation issues. These redwood trees provide a pleasing and protective environment for the tot lot, as well as providing nice aesthetic entry to the community. This option is therefore not recommended. Option 3: Operate northbound bus service on Dougherty Road without entering the project site. This would require installing a new bus stop on Dougherty Road north of South Mariposa Drive and paving an area for passenger waiting. A bus turnout needs to be installed in the interim (near term) condition. With the planned future widening of Dougherty Road, the bus turnout would need to be relocated further to the east of the roadway to accommodate three northbound through lanes. Analysis: Although operating the bus service on Dougherty Road without serving the project site offers the fastest travel time for onboard passengers, removing northbound bus service into the site increases the distance passengers need to walk to get to the project. This is particularly undesirable since passengers would need to cross Dougherty Road which is currently a four lane arterial, and will become asix-lane arterial in the buildout condition. Passengers are likely to include many seniors and children in the community. Since this community has an affordable housing component, some residents are likely to have no cars or one car per household. Residents are likely to go grocery shopping by bus which would require walking across six lanes of a wide arterial such as Dougherty Road with groceries with this option. Line 3, which serves the site, operates with 30-minute headways. When bus headways are this low, passengers are prone to run after the bus which creates a safety issue. Option 4 (Consultant recommendation): Operate a northbound left turn from Dougherty Road at Ventura Drive, left turn at Public Street B, (with an optional additional stop just south of Ventura Drive), serve the same bus stop as southbound service at the senior housing building on the west side of Public Loop, and exit the project site via South Mariposa Drive, and make a left turn through a new signalized intersection at South Mariposa Drive/Dougherty Road onto northbound Dougherty Road. This option restricts access at Ventura Drive/Dougherty Road to eastbound right-in/right-out and northbound left-in access. Analysis: Option 4 allows northbound bus service to continue serving the site, with better service via the addition of a Ventura Drive bus stop. It also serves the existing bus stop without the need to install a separate northbound stop, as well as providing an easily maneuverable route by the bus driver. Analysis has been conducted at the intersection of Ventura Drive and Dougherty Road without and with a traffic signal. Results of the analysis show that a partial signal with protected northbound left turn on Dougherty Road to Ventura Drive will operate well. However, the City may accept an unsignalized left-turn ingress at Ventura. Egress would remain as right turn only. Option 4 is recommended. Impact TR-7 The proposed project would remove North Mariposa Road access to Dougherty Road and prohibit left turns from Ventura Drive onto northbound Dougherty Road. Each of these changes would disrupt existing transit service. This impact is significant. Page 5 I Report -Traffic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Januory 7, 2009 ~~ Mitigation Measure TR-7 Provision for alternate bus circulation and transit amenities necessary to accommodate demand is needed to mitigate this impact. Several circulation alternatives were examined. For southbound bus service, two feasible options have been identified. For northbound bus service, two feasible options have been identified. A final determination of bus routing will be made through coordination between the City of Dublin, LAVTA and the project applicant. The project applicant shall provide the necessary bus stops and/or bus pullouts and associated amenities required to .implement the final bus routes to mitigate the impact to aless-than-significant level. Bicycle and Pedestrian Circulation Impacts The site plan of the proposed project was reviewed for consistency with the City's Bikeways Master Plan, to determine any impacts resulting from changes to existing and proposed bikeways. It was determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Bikeway Master Plan and will preserve the existing alignment of the Alamo Creek Trail, which will form the western boundary of the project site. Additionally, the existing Class I bike path located on the east side of Dougherty Road will remain unchanged with the project since the site is located west of Dougherty Road. The site plan includes sidewalks for safe pedestrian circulation within the development. Therefore the project will have no significant impact on bicycle and pedestrian circulation. Report - Tra)~c Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Page 52 January 7, 2009 t~a3 ~ X55 -~~.~: rar?s::~, ~..., ~. ~~r~,suiian:. Project Site Circulation, Parking, and Access Review TJKM conducted a review of project site circulation, parking, and access. Observations and recommendations are outlined below. Parking Review The project sponsor proposes to provide 396 residential garage parking spaces, 272 uncovered surface parking spaces, and 168 covered surface parking spaces. This total of 836 spaces includes 25 spaces for the day care and community center. The residential component of the development has a parking supply ratio of (836-25)/378 = 2.15. According to the City of Dublin Parking Code, `, two parking stalls are needed for each residential unit to meet the peak parking demand that typically occurs between the hours of midnight to 5:00 a.m. Therefore, the proposed 378 residential units would require approximately 756 stalls by code. The proposed project will provide 81 I residential spaces, which exceeds Code requirements by 55 spaces. Additionally, the senior housing component of the development is expected to require less than two parking spaces per residential unit. Based on ITE parking generation rates, 50 senior housing units are expected to require between 17 and 25 parking spaces during peak demand periods that typically occur on weekends. A total of 38 covered stalls are designated for senior housing. Also, a 3,000 square-foot day care facility for 48 children is expected to create demand for approximately I 0 parking spaces during operating hours (7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.). The community center is for project use only, therefore many patrons are likely to walk or bike to the center instead of driving. The parking spaces provided. for the center are provided as courtesy for deliveries, leasing, etc. These spaces can be used for additional guest parking. Since the senior housing building is close to the day care and community center building, guests of senior residents will have opportunities to ` utilize the 25 parking spaces after hours to meet any parking short falls. ' Based on the above discussions, it is reasonable to conclude that the proposed 836 parking spaces will be adequate for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development. Access Review Signalization at Dou$hert~ Road/S Marioosa Drive Intersection According to the City's design policy guidelines, signalized intersections located on arterials should i be spaced at a minimum of 750 feet. The proposed full-access driveway at Dougherty Road / S. Mariposa Drive (primary access) should be signalized to mitigate project impacts and will be spaced more than 750 feet from Dougherty Road/Amador Valley to the north and Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive to the south. Therefore, the location of Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive is expected to meet City design policy guidelines. Although Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive does not meet traffic signal warrants on the basis of peak hour traffic volumes (i.e. slightly less than 100 vehicles per hour on the side street), it is recommended to signalize the intersection for the following reasons: signalization is expected to alleviate northbound left-turn and eastbound queuing, provide quick bus exits from the development, and also provide a crosswalk for safe pedestrian crossing and bike connectivity between the Class I bike trail located on the east side of Dougherty Road and the Iron Horse Trail. Therefore, the installation of traffic signals at the Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive Intersection is justified by considering_the safety and circulation of all four travel modes (i.e. automobile, bus, bicycle, and pedestrians). Providing protected left turn signal phasing for northbound left-turn traffic is expected to improve both automobile and bus access to and from the project site. As Page 53 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ~a~ ~~ ~~~ ,. ~ i;M r ranspo ~acion ~onsuitan?~s noted elsewhere, the lack of a traffic signal at this location is considered a significant project impact. This impact is mitigated by the installation of traffic signals. Access Control at Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive and Dougherty Road/Mariposa Drive Intersections The City design guidelines do not include similar criteria for unsignalized intersections located on arterials. Currently, there are four unsignalized intersections that provide access from Dougherty " Road to the existing Arroyo Vista site. Of these four, the Ventura Drive and Monterey Drive intersections are located less than 520 feet from the nearby Amador Valley Boulevard/Dougherty Road and Scarlett Drive / Dougherty Road intersections, respectively. Based on traffic safety, traffic +~ queuing and expected eastbound left-turn delays at the driveways, it is recommended to restrict Dougherty Road /Monterey Drive as a right-in/right-out driveway with signalization of the primary access driveway at S. Mariposa Drive. As discussed under Bus Circulation Option 4, installing a ^~ "partial" traffic signal at Dougherty Road / Ventura Drive with an eastbound left-turn restriction is ' expected to conveniently serve the northern section of the development, but is not required to ~' mitigate the northbound bus circulation impact. This signal would not affect northbound through ~,, traffic. It would signalize the southbound through movement, northbound left-turn movement and the eastbound right-turn movement. It would be a simple two-phase signal (one phase for southbound traffic and one for northbound left-turn traffic overlapped with eastbound right turn traffic) that could easily be coordinated with the signal at Amador Valley Boulevard with the '~ installation of signal interconnect cable between the two intersections. ~~• Project Site Circulation The current site plan shows a width of 22 feet along the Public Loop roadway. This should be ? increased to at least 24 feet to meet the minimum requirements of the City. The City requires a 40-foot minimum roadway width for atwo-lane residential street that includes parking on both sides. The planned 36-foot width for Public Streets A and B is less than the City's standard. Based on template analysis, the width of Public Street A between the planned bulb-outs ,~ located at the intersection of Public Loop and Public Street A has inadequate turning radii for safe turning movements at the intersection. As a result, the current design may cause congestion at the ~` intersection. Finally, the proposed angled parking spaces on Public Street A for day care patrons appear acceptable. TJKM recommends redesigning the southwestern bulb-out at the intersection of Public Loop and Public Street A. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation The site plan includes five-foot sidewalks along both sides of all internal streets for safe pedestrian '""`° circulation within the development. Sidewalks are also provided along Dougherty Road. The ,~, sidewalks will provide easy pedestrian access throughout the community and from the Dougherty Road and the bike/pedestrian path on the east side of Dougherty Road. The 36-foot width of the internal streets is inadequate for the inclusion of dedicated bicycle lanes and thus cyclists are -; expected to share the streets with autos. Page 54 Report - Tro~c Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ~ ~a5 ~f- ~s5 -ir..±~f °an~[~~; ~a;ior~ ~ansui~ar~s. Supplementary Analysis A supplementary analysis was conducted to assess the impact of relocating the Camp Parks access at Dublin Boulevard to the main project access (Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive) rather than to Amador Valley Boulevard. The Camp Parks driveway would form the fourth leg of the Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive intersection. As previously noted, the proposed main project access will likely be signalized and spaced more than 750 feet from Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard to the north and Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive to the south. Relocating the Camp Parks main access driveway may be necessary if a portion of the RFTA site is redeveloped for mixed-uses. For the purpose of this study, it was assumed that the future Central Parkway extension would connect with Dougherty Road north of where Scarlett Drive intersects Dougherty Road. Figures 15 and 16 shows the turning movement volumes and lane configurations and traffic controls for five study intersections under the alternate RFTA access scenario. Intersection Level of Service Analysis -Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions (Alternate Camp Parks Access) ' Table XII summarizes peak hour levels of service at the intersections of Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive, Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard, Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard and all three project driveway intersections with Dougherty Road. The analysis was conducted only for the Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions. Appendix K contains the level of service worksheets. With the Camp Parks access located at Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard, the majority of westbound Camp Parks motorists heading towards downtown Dublin (approximately 370 vehicles per hour) are expected to use Amador Valley Boulevard to avoid traffic congestion to the south at Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard during the p.m. peak period. Alternatively, with the Camp Parks access located at Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive, fewer westbound Camp Parks motorists (approximately 10 percent compared with approximately 64 percent with the access located at Amador Valley Boulevard) are expected to use Amador Valley Boulevard. Under this alternate access scenario, higher northbound left-turn delays are expected at Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard during both a.m. and p.m. peak periods. As a result, the majority of Camp Parks motorists are expected to head south on Dougherty Road to reach downtown Dublin via Dublin Boulevard, thereby contributing to traffic congestion at Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard, particularly during the p.m. peak period. As shown in Table XII, the intersection of Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard improves in LOS from E to D when the fourth leg for Camp Parks access is excluded. There are no significant differences in the levels of service for Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive and the three project driveway intersections under the two Camp Parks access location scenarios. Therefore, it can be concluded that the proposed Project will not preclude the relocation of the Camp Parks driveway to align with S. Mariposa Drive. Page 55 Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development January 7, 2009 ear ~ X55 "i I: ~'. ra~~sac ~,ci~r ~~nsuitants Based on the above discussions, it is recommended to base the decision to relocate the Camp Parks access to either Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard or Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive on factors such as right-of--way acquisition costs, safety, security, and traffic circulation, rather than based solely on intersection performance measures. Table X11: Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service -Long Term Cumulative plus Project Conditions (Alternate Camn Parks Oc-cPSS1 Access relocated to Dougherty Rd. / Access relocated to Dougherty Rd. I Si li Amador Valley Blvd. S. Mariposa Dr. -D gna zed Intersection A,M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Hour Hour Hour Hour V/ C LOS V/ C LOS V/ C LOS V/ C LOS Dougherty Road / I Amador Valley Boulevard* 0.91 E 0.96 E 0.87 D 0.69 B 2 Dougherty Road / Scarlett Drive 0.58 A 0.75 C 0.59 A 0.75 C 4 Dougherty Road / Dublin Boulevard 0.81. D 0.95 E 0.81 D I.01 F Unsignalized A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A.M. Peak P.M. Peak -D Inter ti Hour Hour Hour Hour sec on Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Dougherty Road / I I Ventura Drives 0.1 27.8 A D ( ) ( ) 0.1 16.8 A C ( ) ( ) 0.1 18.5 A C ( ) ( ) 0. I 12.5 A B ( ) ( ) ~ 2 Dougherty Road / - - N. Mariposa Drivel - - - - - Dougherty Road / S. Mariposa Drives 7 1 120+ A F ~ ) ~) I.0 38.8 A E ~ ) ~ ) 8.1 120+ A F ~ ) ~ ) 120+ 120+ F F ~ ) ~ ) 3 ......_._...._..._..........._ ..................._....._.._...........___.._....._._ _......_........._..._..__......._...................._....._..._.._... ..........._......_.._............. . . With tro~c signals os . . ............__._............_....... ........................_.__...._....................._....._........~_ _..__...._...............__............._....._...._..__................ mitigotion3 0.60 B 0.45 A 0.61 B 0.63 B 14 w~ Dougherty Road / Monterey Drives ____. 0.1(I 9.2) A(C) 0.1(I 3.8) A(B) 0.1(I 9.2) A(C) 0. I (I 3.8) A(B) ......,.. w., - cc~ci ~i acs v~cc V / C =Volume-to-capacity ratio for overall signalized intersection X (X) =Intersection level of service (Level of service for the minor approach) X.X (X.X) =Average delay in seconds per vehicle overall one-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) intersection (Delay in seconds per vehicle to minor approach) Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS conditions Reconfigured driveway zlntersection does not exist with project *Four-leg intersection under "Dougherty Road /Amador Valley Boulevard Access" scenario 3Performance measure is V / C Report - Tro~c Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Page 56 January 7, 2009 ~a~ ~f- ~t55 City of Dublin -Traffic Study for ArroyoYista Housing Development Figure LongTerm Cumulative (2025) Plus Project Conditions - ~ 5 Alternate Camp Parks Access Turning Movement Volumes I57-0OITI IS-4/I5/08-DM lQa~ ~-E '~ ~~~ m~~ City of Dublin -Traffic Study for Arroyo Vista Housing Development Fi ure Long Term Cumulative (2025) Plus Project Conditions - g Alternate Camp Parks Access Lane Configurations and Traffic Controls ' 6 ~M ~~ 4 i~an;RO'"~aLion Consuita.nts Study Participants T)KM Personnel Chris Kinzel, P.E. David Mahama, P.E. Andrew Kluter, P.E. Jia Hao Wu, Ph.D. Frank Yeh Kai Han, E.LT. Geri Foley Margie Pfaff Persons Contacted Jaimee Bourgeois, P.E. Erica Fraser, AICP Principal-In-Charge Project Manager/Project Engineer Senior Transportation Engineer Senior Modeler Transportation Planner Assistant Transportation Engineer Graphic Designer Word Processing City of Dublin City of Dublin References Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Technical Procedures Manual, 2006. Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (ACCMA) Technical and Policy Guidelines, 2007. Tri-Valley Transportation Plan and Action Plan Update, Draft Report, February 26, 2008. Highway Capacity Monuo12000, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2000. Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington DC, 2003. ? Draft EIR for Dublin Transit Center, SCH No. 20001120395 (July 2001], available at the City of Dublin. Mysteries of the PHF, Ransford S. McCourt, Western ITE, November -December, 2002 Edition Report - Tragic Study for the Arroyo Vista Housing Development Page 5 9 Jonuary 7, 2009 ~3~ ~- ~5~ APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE The description and procedures for calculating capacity and level of service (LOS) are found in Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual 2000. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 represents the latest research on capacity and quality of service for transportation facilities. Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. LOS is a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience. Six levels of service are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters designate each level, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each LOS represents a range of operating conditions and the driver's perception of these conditions. Safety is not included in the measures that establish service levels. A general description of service levels for various types of facilities is shown in Table A-I Table A-1: Level of Service Description Uninterrupted Flow Interrupted Flow Facility Type Freeways Multi-lane Highways Two-lane Highways Urban Streets Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections Two-way Stop Control All-way Stop Control LOS A Free-flow Very low delay. B Stable flow. Presence of other users noticeable. Low delay. C Stable flow. Comfort and convenience starts to decline. Acceptable delay. D High-density stable flow. Tolerable delay. E Unstable flow. Limit of acceptable delay. F Forced or breakdown flow. Unacceptable delay Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Urban Streets The term "urban streets" refers to urban arterials and collectors, including those in downtown areas. Arterial streets are roads that primarily serve longer through trips. However, providing access to abutting commercial and residential land uses is also an important function of arterials. Collector streets provide both land access and traffic circulation within residential, commercial and industrial areas. Their access function is more important than that of arterials, and unlike arterials their operation is not always dominated by traffic signals. Downtown streets are signalized facilities that often resemble arterials. They not only move through traffic but also provide access to local businesses for passenger cars, transit buses, and trucks. ~~~a ~ ~~~ Pedestrian conflicts and lane obstructions created by stopping or standing buses, trucks and parking vehicles that cause turbulence in the traffic flow are typical of downtown streets. The speed of vehicles on urban streets is influenced by three main factors, street environment, interaction among vehicles and traffic control. As a result, these factors also affect quality of service. The street environment includes the geometric characteristics of the facility, the character of roadside activity and adjacent land uses. Thus, the environment reflects the number and width of lanes, type of median, driveway density, spacing between signalized intersections, existence of parking, level of pedestrian activity and speed limit. The interaction among vehicles is determined by traffic density, the proportion of trucks and buses, and turning movements. This interaction affects the operation of vehicles at intersections and, to a lesser extent, between signals. Traffic control (including signals and signs) forces a portion of all vehicles to slow or stop. The delays and speed changes caused by traffic control devices reduce vehicle speeds, however, such controls are needed to establish right-of-way. The average travel speed for through vehicles along an urban street is the determinant of the operating LOS. The travel speed along a segment, section or entire length of an urban street is dependent on the running speed between signalized intersections and the amount of control delay incurred at signalized intersections. LOS A describes primarily free-flow operations. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal. LOS B describes reasonably unimpeded operations. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and control delays at signalized intersections are not significant. LOS C describes stable operations, however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock location may be more restricted than at LOS B. Longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower travel speeds. LOS D borders on a range in which in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or a combination of these factors. LOS E is characterized by significant delays and lower travel speeds. Such operations are caused by a combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. LOS F is characterized by urban street flow at extremely low speeds. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays, high volumes, and extensive queuing. The methodology to determine LOS stratifies urban streets into four classifications. The classifications are complex, and are related to functional and design categories. Table A-II describes the functional and design categories, while Table A-III relates these to the urban street classification. ~~: ~~~ ~-~- ~~~5 Once classified, the urban street is divided into segments for analysis. An urban street segment is a one-way section of street encompassing a series of blocks or links terminating at a signalized intersection. Adjacent segments of urban streets may be combined to form larger street sections, provided that the segments have similar demand flows and characteristics. Levels of service are related to the average travel speed of vehicles along the urban street segment or section. Travel times for existing conditions are obtained by field measurements. The maximum-car technique is used. The vehicle is driven at the posted speed limit unless impeded by actual traffic conditions. In the maximum-car technique, a safe level of vehicular operation is maintained by observing proper following distances and by changing speeds at reasonable rates of acceleration and deceleration. The maximum- car technique provides the best base for measuring traffic performance. An observer records the travel time and locations and duration of delay. The beginning and ending points are the centers of intersections. Delays include times waiting in queues at signalized intersections. The travel speed is determined by dividing the length of the segment by the travel time. Once the travel speed on the arterial is determined, the LOS is found by comparing the speed to the criteria in Table A-IV. LOS criteria vary for the different classifications of urban street, reflecting differences in driver expectations. Table A-II: Functional and Design Categories for Urban Streets Functional Category Criterion Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Mobility function Very important Important Access function Very minor Substantial Points connected Freeways, important activity centers, major principal arterials traffic generators Relatively long trips between major points Trips of moderate length within relatively Predominant trips served and through trips entering, leaving, and small geographical areas passing through city Design Category Criterion High-Speed Suburban Intermediate Urban Driveway access density Very low density Low density Moderate density High density Multilane divided; Multilane divided: Multilane divided or Undivided one Arterial type undivided or two- undivided or two- lane with undivided; one way, way; two way, two lane with shoulders shoulders two lane or more lanes Parking No No Some Usually Separate left-turn lanes Yes Yes Usually Some Signals per mile 0.5 to 2 Ito 5 4 to 10 6 to 12 Speed limits 45 to 55 mph 40 to 45 mph 30 to 40 mph 25 to 35 mph Pedestrian activity Very little Little Some Usually Roadside development Low density Low to medium density Medium to moderate density High density Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000 ~3~ ~~ X55 Table A-III: Urban Street Class based on Function and Desion Cateanripc Desi n Cate o Functional Category g g ry Principal Arterial Minor Arterial High-Speed I Not applicable Suburban II I I Intermediate II III or IV Urban III or IV IV .avur~c. nrgnwuy wpuury inanuar wvv Table A-IV: Urban Street Levels of Service by Class Urban Street Class 1 11 111 1V Range of Free Flow Speeds (mph) 45 to 55 35 to 45 30 to 35 25 to 35 Typical Free Flow Speed (mph) 50 40 33 30 LOS Average Travel Speed (mph) A >42 >35 >30 >25 B >34 >28 >24 >19 C >27 >22 >18 >13 D >21 >17 >14 >9 E >16 >13 >10 >7 F 516 513 510 <_7 .awr a.c. nrgnwuy wpuury ntunuur tvvv Interrupted Flow One of the more important elements limiting, and often interrupting the flow of traffic on a highway is the intersection. Flow on an interrupted facility is usually dominated by points of fixed operation such as traffic signals, stop and yield signs. These all operate quite differently and have differing impacts on overall flow. Unsignalized Intersections The current procedures on unsignalized intersections were first introduced in the 1997 update to the Highway Capacity Manual and represent a revision of the methodology published in the 1994 update to the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. The revised procedures use control delay as a measure of effectiveness to determine LOS. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, traffic and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions, i. e., in the absence of traffic control, geometric delay, any incidents, and any other vehicles. Control delay is the increased time of travel for a vehicle approaching and passing through an unsignalized intersection, compared with a free-flow vehicle if it were not required to slow or stop at the intersection. .~ ~. tv35 ° f ~ 55 Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersections Two-way stop controlled intersections in which stop signs are used to assign the right-of-way, are the most prevalent type of intersection in the United States. At two-way stop-controlled intersections the stop-controlled approaches are referred as the minor street approaches and can be either public streets or private driveways. The approaches that are not controlled by stop signs are referred to as the major street approaches. The capacity of movements subject to delay are determined using the "critical gap" method of capacity analysis. Expected average control delay based on movement volume and movement capacity is calculated. A LOS designation is given to the expected control delay for each minor movement. LOS is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Control delay is the increased time of travel for a vehicle approaching and passing through astop-controlled intersection, compared with afree-flow vehicle if it were not required to slow or stop at the intersection. A description of levels of service for two-way stop-controlled intersections is found in Table A-VI. Table A-VI: Description of Level of Service for Two-Way Stop Controlled Intersections LOS Description A Very low control delay less than 10 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. B Low control delay greater than 10 and up to 15 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. C Acceptable control delay greater than 15 and up to 25 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. D Tolerable control delay greater than 25 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. E Limit of tolerable control delay greater than 35 and up to 50 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. F Unacceptable control delay in excess of 50 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000 J:\TJKM AppendiceslLOS-HCM 2000.doc ~3~ ~ X55 0 DESCRIPTION OF INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS CCTA SIGNALIZED METHODOLOGY Background The CCTA intersection capacity analysis methodology is described in detail in the Technical Procedures Manual of the CCTA, January, 1991. It is identical to the Circular 212 Planning methodology except that the lane capacity has been increased from 1500 vph to between 1650 to 1800 vph based on saturation flow measurements taken at four intersections in Contra Costa County. (See following Table 9 from the Technical Procedures Manual.) On average, saturation flow rates for left-turn lanes were over ten percent lower than for through lanes. However, insufficient data was collected to provide statistical accuracy for the averages. Thus, saturation flow rates for through lanes are equal to those for turn lanes. This methodology determines the critical movement for each phase of traffic. It then sums the critical volume-to-capacity ratio by phase to determine the intersection volume-to-capacity ratio. Circular 212, on the other hand, sums the critical movement volumes themselves and compares them to the total capacity of the intersection to determine, in effect, the volume-to-capacity ratio of the intersection as a whole. Levels of Service The volume-to-capacity ratio is related to level of service (LOS). The following level of service for Signalized Intersections depicts the relationship between the volume-to-capacity ratio and level of service. An intersection operating at capacity would operate at LOS E. Level of Service F is not possible for existing conditions, but can be forecasted for future conditions when volume projections exceed existing capacities. Input Data The intersection capacity work sheets use a code to identify different lane configurations. This nomenclature is described on the following Description of Lane Configurations. Right turn on red adjustments are accounted for as well as unequal distribution of turn volumes in double turn lanes. For more information, see Circular 212 and the CCTA Technical Procedures Manual. LEVEL OF SERVICE RANGES VOLUME TO MAXIMUM SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES LOS CAPACITY RATIO 2-Phase 3-Phase 4+-Phase A < 0.60 1,080 1,030 .990 B 0.61 - 0.70 1,260 1,200 1,160 C 0.71 - 0.80 1,440 1,380 1,320 D 0.81 - 0.90 1,620 1,550 1,490 E 0.91 - 1.00 1,800 1,720 1,650 F -------------Not Applicable------------ Source: Contra Costa Growth Management Program, Technical Procedures, Table 9. cctavc.app ~F 131 ~f- ~i55 DESCRIPTION OF LANE CONFIGURATION FORMAT The number of lanes and the use of the lanes is denoted with a special nomenclature described below: Lane Nomenclature X,Y Where X Denotes the total number of lanes available for a particular movement. Y Denotes how the lanes are used. When Y is ... ...The followin a lies: ,.o n A lane used exclusively for a particular movement (i.e., exclusive left-turn lane). O t-' 1.0T ~~ 1AL I' ~- "R A lane which is shared, that is, either of two different movements can be made from a ~' ~. +.oL particular lane (i.e., a lane which is shared by through and right-turn traffic). . -._._ '' n - -- z.z r Denotes two or more through lanes in which two lanes are shared, one with left-turn (: ~~: ,., L traffic, the other with right-turn traffic. Denotes an ex resswa throu h movement. ~, 4 ~ .fan .,,_. ~" Denotes aright-turn movement from a wide outside lane where right-turn vehicles can _. bypass through traffic sharing the lane to make aright-turn on red. 3.tl1 (~ ~ -. ,.s a Denotes aright-turn movement from an exclusive right-turn lane with aright-turn arrow 5 ,''~~- 2.pT and prohibition on the conflicting U-turn movement. ~ '._. ,.oL I' 6 ",~~--''~n Denotes aright-turn movement from a shared lane with aright-turn arrow and prohibition ~=- a"'r on the conflicting U-turn movement. t.QL Denotes a turnin movement which has a se arate lane to turn into, as shown below: ~;a i ~~ Turn lane which is shared with a through lane or left-turn lane and under signal control, 7 ' '- ;~~ ~ and which has its own lane to turn into. There must be at lease two throu h lanes. g f~~~ r,.:. `- , 4R f Exclusive turn lane which is under signal control and which has its own lane to turn into. ~ -- 2.4T 8 i- tAL I•~~. ~~1 ~ ..4 n Exclusive turn lane not under signal control and which has an exclusive lane to turn into, 9 f~- 2.4T often referred to as a "free" turn. Since the volumes in this lane do not conflict with other ,.4 L intersection movements, the V/C ratio of the free right-turn movement is not included in ~'~i! the sum of critical V/C ratios. J:ITechnicallAppendiceslCCTA Signalized Methodology.doc cctavc.app ~~~~ ~ ~~5 lv3~i ~ ~ ~5 _. Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 hLtA://www.fao-consu Iting.com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 22, 2007 INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd and Amador Valley Blvd. START TIME: 7:00 AM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Tuesday END TIME: 9:00 AM COUNT ID: MCB/1 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Rd. Dougherty Rd. Amador Valley Blvd. Amador Valley Blvd. Left Thru R" ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht 7:00 7:15 625 65 108 0 0 313 42 16 0 80 0 0 0 7:15 7:30 664 54 115 0 0 355 49 21 0 71 0 0 0 7:30 7:45 700 64 109 0 0 389 40 20 0 77 0 0 0 7:45 8:00 753 111 116 0 0 334 56 20 0 116 0 0 0 8:00 8:15 688 89 115 0 0 349 57 15 0 63 0 0 0 8:15 8:30 745 93 117 0 0 364 64 39 0 68 0 0 0 8:30 8:45 626 76 100 0 0 302 32 33 0 83 0 0 0 8:45 9:00 568 42 119 0 0 267 35 31 0 74 0 0 0 Total 553 779 0 0 2406 340 165 0 .557 0 0 0 HOURLY 7:00 8:00 2742 295 448 0 0 1391 186 78 0 344 0 0 0 7:15 8:15 2805 318 454 0 0 1427 201 77 0 327 0 0 0 7:30 8:30 2885 358 456 0 0 1437 216 94 0 324 0 0 0 7:45 8:45 2811 370 447 0 0 1350 209 107 0 329 0 0 0 8:00 9:00 2626 300 450 0 0 1283 189 118 0 287 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 7:30 8:30 2885 358 456 0 0 1437 .216 94 0 324 0 0 0 r° cy nnovemen[ 1Z.4%o 1b.S% UA% U.U"/o 4y.tl"/o /.5% By Approach 28.2 % 57.3% M CI ~ fD u) N L 01 Q' 94 Left In 418 Thru ~ Out 574 324 .Right ~ N7 O ~ r M r 7 L f- Southbound c 7 a PHF = 0.96 H A W Northbound r ~ m ~ ~ c W A Vt V7 ao W o IO s.sr° o.or° 111% o.or° o.o% o.o% 14.5% 0.0% ' J Right ~ In N ~ Thru C a OUt Left :(7 00 a I5 Data File: Dougherty_Amador Valley - TMC (AM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 1 ~~p °~ ~~~ ~~COMSUtTt-iG Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto://www.fao-consu Iting.com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 22, 2007 INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Amador Valley Rd. START TIME: 4:OOPM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Tuesday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/1 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Doughtery Road Amador Valley Blvd Amador Valley Blvd. Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 16:00 16:15 625 98 205 0 0 174 28 45 0 76 0 0 0 16:15 16:30 628 89 249 0 0 160 25 53 0 54 0 0 0 16:30 16:45 666 94 234 0 0 181 28 56 0 74 0 0 0 16:45 17:00 728 117 272 0 0 177 41 43 0 78 0 0 0 17:00 17:15 773 109 331 0 0 167 23 79 0 63 0 0 0 17:15 17:30 771 117 286 0 0 174 25 85 0 86 0 0 0 17:30 17:45 855 120 342 0 0 198 49 83 0 63 0 0 0 17:45 18:00 829 123 335 0 0 176 30 84 0 81 0 0 0 Total 867 2253 '0 0 :.1406 248 '526 0 575 0 0 0 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 2646 398 959 0 0 691 121 196 0 282 0 0 0 16:15 17:15 2794 409 1085 0 0 685 116 230 0 269 0 0 0 16:30 17:30 2938 437 1123 0 0 699 116 263 0 301 0 0 0 16:45 17:45 3126 463 1231 0 0 716 137 289 0 290 0 0 0 17:00 18:00 3228 469 1294 0 0 715 126 330 0 294 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 17:00 18:00 3228 469 1294 0 0 715 126 330 0 294 0 0 0 By Movement 14.5% 40.1% D.0 % 0.0% 22.1% 3.9% ey Approach 54.6% 26.1 v a, o cl ~ N ~ n r ~ a r rLn/YI H r Southbound 330 Left In 624 Thru C~ Out 596 294 Right e 0 ~° PHF = 0.94 n m W r A O) (D Northbound c N [O A o IO O S aD 10.2% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.3% 0.0% J Right ~ In H 0 c ~ Thru c °~ Out Left co ~ h A Data File: Dougherty_Amador Valley - TMC (PM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 2 ~~i ~- ass PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Ventura Dr TYPE: Stop Sign ^_. ._ ~~~x~t_~e~~ Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto:l/www.fao-consu Iting.com COUNT DATE: May 22, 2007 START TIME: 7:00 AM LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Tuesday END TIME: 9:00 AM COUNT ID: MCB/2 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Dougherty Road Ventura Drive Ventura Drive Left Thru R' ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht 7:00 7:15 516 0 154 0 0 360 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 7:30 635 0 212 0 0 421 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 7:45 641 0 236 0 0 403 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 7:45 8:00 713 0 260 0 0 450 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 8:15 620 0 220 0 0 396 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 8:30 559 0 191 0 0 366 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 8:45 559 0 143 0 0 413 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 8:45 9:00 518 1 135 0 0 377 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 1415 0 0 213119 3 14 0 2 0 0 0 HOURLY 7:00 8:00 2505 0 863 0 0 1634 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 7:15 8:15 2609 0 928 0 0 1670 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 7:30 8:30 2533 0 906 0 0 1616 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 7:45 8:45 2451 0 813 0 0 1625 3 9 0 1 0 0 0 8:00 9:00 2256 1 688 0 0 1553 3 11 0 1 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 7:15 8:15 2609 0 928 0 0 1670 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 By Movement 0.0% 35.6 % 0.0% 0.0% 64.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0% By Approach 35.6% 64.1 % 0.3% 0.0% M ~ c~ ~ 5I ~ O ~ O N r ~ ~ ~ ~ J Southbound 8 Left ~ ~ Right In ~ ~ In 9 ~ Thru ~ a PHF = 0.92 c ~ Thru Out w °~ Out 2 1 Right ~ ~ Left Northbound W ~ ~p ~ _ N 00 ~ l O ~ j ~ ~~ Data File: Dougherty_Ventura - TMC (AM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 1 ~~a ~ X55 PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Ventura Dr TYPE: Stop Sign +4~-J-. - CDN.t4ULS1M~i Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto://www.fao-consu Itinq.com COUNT DATE: May 22, 2007 START TIME: 4:OOPM LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Tuesday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/2 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Doughtery Road Ventura Drive Ventura Drive Left Thru R' ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht 16:00 16:15 508 1 274 0 0 233 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 16:30 499 0 296 0 0 200 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 16:30 16:45 574 0 330 0 0 241 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 17:00 571 2 336 0 0 229 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 17:15 658 0 441 0 0 214 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 17:30 734 1 456 0 0 275 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 17:45 666 0 421 0 0 244 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 18:00 680 0 430 0 0 248 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 Total 4 2985 0 0 1885 9 6 0 2 0 0 0 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 2153 3 1236 0 0 903 4 4 0 1 0 0 0 16:15 17:15 2303 2 1404 0 0 885 5 5 0 1 0 0 0 16:30 17:30 2537 3 1564 0 0 960 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 17:45 2629 3 1655 0 0 963 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 18:00 2739 1 1749 0 0 981 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 17:00. 18:00 2739 1 1749 0 0 981 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 %ByMOVement o.o% s3.a% o.o% o.o% 35.6% o.z% o.t% o.o% o.o% o.o% o.o% o.o% By Approach 63.9% 36.0% 0.1 % 0.0 c~ ~ pl ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ J (,-JLJnYI JInI~ r V Southbound 2 Left ~ ~ Right In 9 ~ In 3 ~ ~ 0 Thru ~ a PHF = 0.93 c ~ Thru h e m ~ Out w °~ Out 5 1 Right ~ ~ Left Northbound ~ ~ m ~ m ~ c ~' -' A u1 ~ lO ~ 13 W O Data File: Dougherty_Ventura - TMC (PM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 2 I~~I3 ~ q 55 ~~~eo ~tsutrt~~ Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 httpalwww.fao-consu ltinq.com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 22, 2007 INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and N. Mariposa Dr. START TIME: 7:00 AM TYPE: Stop Sign LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Tuesday END TIME: 9:00 AM COUNT ID: MCB/3 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Dougherty Road N. Mariposa N. Mariposa Left Thru R" ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 7:00 7:15 490 1 121 0 0 365 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 7:15 7:30 498 0 121 0 0 374 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 7:30 7:45 620 1 201 0 0 416 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 7:45 8:00 613 0 175 0 0 433 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 8:00 8:15 604 1 190 0 0 413 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 8:30 588 1 190 0 0 394 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 8:45 505 1 122 0 0 381 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 9:00 530 1 160 0 0 366 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 Total 5 1120 0 0 2776 8 3 -0 6 0 0 0 HOURLY 7:00 8:00 2221 2 618 0 0 1588 4 2 0 6 0 0 0 7:15 8:15 2336 2 687 0 0 1635 3 3 0 5 0 0 0 7:30 8:30 2426 3 755 0 0 1655 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 7:45 8:45 2310 3 676 0 0 1621 5 2 0 2 0 0 0 8:00 9:00 2228 4 661 0 0 1555 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 7:30 8:30 2426 3 755 0 0 1655 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 -ro oy movemen[ U.1 %o ;57.7"/o U.U% 0.U"/o 6C.2% U.'L"h U.1% U.0% U.1% 0.U% U.0% 0.0% By Approach 31.3% 68.5% 0.3% 0.0% c~ ~ ° u~y O ~ ~ u5 U) N ~ ~ ~ InFI J V Southbound 3 Left ~ ~ Right In v ~ In 6 o H Thru IJ~ ~° PHF = 0.98 c ~ Thru e w Out °~ ut 9 3 Right ~ ~ Left Northbound r ~ ~ ~ ~ c 3 V W U1 CT V ' (~71 lO ~ ~7 Data File: Dougherty_N.Mariposa -TMC (AM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 1 ~~~{ ~ a55 PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and N. Mariposa TYPE: Stop Sign ,-~~._ GOltAUt't {qG Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 hjt;p:/Iwww.fao-consulting com COUNT DATE: May 22, 2007 START TIME: 4:OOPM LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Tuesday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/3 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Doughtery Road N. Mariposa N. Mariposa Left Thru R' ht Left Thru R" hf Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 16:00 16:15 594 2 334 0 0 256 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 16:15 16:30 609 2 390 0 0 214 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 16:30 16:45 558 0 361 0 0 195 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 16:45 17:00 504 3 295 0 0 204 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 17:00 17:15 604 1 364 0 0 235 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 17:15 17:30 692 4 439 0 0 245 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 17:30 17:45 668 2 430 0 0 231 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 17:45 18:00 698 2 454 0 0 238 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 Total 17 3068 '0 0 1818 3 8 0 12 0 0 0 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 2264 8 1380 0 0 869 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 16:15 17:15 2275 6 1410 0 0 848 1 2 0 8 0 0 0 16:30 17:30 2358 9 1459 0 0 879 1 4 0 6 0 0 0 16:45 17:45 2468 11 1528 0 0 915 1 6 0 6 0 0 0 17:00 18:00 2661 10 1688 0 0 949 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 17:00 18:00 2661 10 1688 0 0 949 2- 6 0 6 0 0 0 By movement o.a% 63.a r° o.o r° o.o r° J5. /% u.t n az i o.uno u.z"/o u.u r u.u r u.un By Approach 63.8 % 35.7% 0.5 % 0.0% v ~l~ o~~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ J Southbound 6 Left ~ ~ Right In 9 ~ In 13 = ~ 0 Thru ~, a PHF = 0.95 ; ~ Thru ~ ~ Out w n Out 12 6 Right ~ ~ Left Northbound ~ ~ m ~' ro ~ c' s rn 0 00 ao m Ip ~ ~+ ~ ~ Is ~ V Data File: Dougherty_N.Mariposa - TMC (PM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 2 ~~^ caµsu~reao Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 httf~://www.fao-consulting_com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 22, 2007 INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and S. Mariposa Dr. START TIME: 7:00 AM TYPE: Stop Sign LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Tuesday END TIME: 9:00 AM COUNT ID: MCB/4 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Dougherty Road S. Mariposa S. Mariposa Left Thru R' ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 7:00 7:15 549 0 125 0 0 422 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 7:30 546 1 137 0 0 407 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7:30 7:45 601 2 184 0 0 408 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 7:45 8:00 709 6 192 0 0 496 4 6 0 4 0 0 0 8:00 8:15 569 3 162 0 0 387 3 8 0 6 0 0 0 8:15 8:30 561 2 160 0 0 391 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 8:30 8:45 602 6 159 0 0 423 2 8 0 4 0 0 0 8:45 .9:00 569 3 160 0 0 401 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 Total 21 1119 0 0 2935 11 33 0 19 0 -0 0 HOURLY 7:00 8:00 2405 10 639 0 0 1734 4 12 0 8 0 0 0 7:15 8:15 2426 13 675 0 0 1698 8 18 0 14 0 0 0 7:30 8:30 2441 14 698 0 0 1682 9 25 0 14 0 0 0 7:45 8:45 2442 18 672 0 0 1697 11 28 0 16 0 0 0 8:00 9:00 2301 15 640 0 0 1602 8 21 0 16 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 7:45 8:45 2442 18 672 0 0 1697 11 28 0 16 0 0 0 r°~symovemem u.ir° zi.or° u.ur° u.ur ea.5r° u.ar i.ir u.or u.ir o.oi° u.un° u.oi° ey Approach 28.3% 69.9% 1.8% 0.0% °O o c 0 OI p r` n .- rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ,'Jn~ ~ J r Southbound 28 Left ~' ~ Right In ~ ~ In 44 ~ ~ Thru ~ a PHF = 0.86 c ~ Thru N C A ~ Out Ul a Oul 29 16 Right ~ ~ Left Northbound ~ ~ N ~ gyp' ~ c ~ m ~ N ~ _ W lO ~ i= Data File: Dougherty_S.Mariposa - TMC (AM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 1 ~~~ ~ a55 Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 h~tp://www.fao-consu Iting.com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 22, 2007 INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and S. Mariposa Dr. START TIME: 4:OOPM TYPE: Stop Sign LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Tuesday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/4 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Doughtery Road S. Mariposa S. Mariposa Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 16:00 16:15 543 3 268 0 0 266 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 16:15 16:30 540 5 294 0 0 236 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 16:30 16:45 650 4 406 0 0 228 5 1 0 5 0 0 0 16:45 17:00 574 4 344 0 0 221 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 17:00 17:15 604 3 393 0 0 199 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 17:15 17:30 644 4 407 0 0 227 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 17:45 669 0 419 0 0 243 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 17:45 18:00 698 4 459 0 0 227 1 2 0 4 0 0 0 Total 29 2989 0 0 1847 16 20 0 20 0 0 0 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 2308 17 1311 0 0 950 10 8 0 12 0 0 0 16:15 17:15 2369 17 1437 0 0 884 10 10 0 12 0 0 0 16:30 17:30 2473 16 1550 0 0 875 11 12 0 9 0 0 0 16:45 17:45 2491 12 1563 0 0 890 6 14 0 5 0 0 0 17:00 18:00 2614 12 1678 0 0 897 6 13 0 9 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 17:00 18:00 2614 12 1678 0 0 897 6 13 0 9 0 0 0 t3y Movement 0.5 % fi4.Z% 0.0% 0.0% 34.3% O.Z% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 By Approach 64.6% 34.5% 0.8 % 0.0 cl p O) (D T 00 ~ ~ ~ A J'ra-Ii Ir~'~~ J V Southbound 13 Left ~ ~ Right In ~ ~ In 21 ~ m 0 Thru ~ ~° PHF = 0.94 g ~ Thru N C ~ ~ Out W a Out 18 9 Right ~~ Left Northbound ~ ~7 m ~ cc ~ C ,~„ N V W (D ol~ X13 ~ O Data File: Dougherty_S.Mariposa -TMC (PM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 2 ~0~~ ~ ~~~ PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Monterey Dr TYPE: Stop Sign -_ ~~~s~r"~eN,J Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 gip:/lwww.fao-consulting com COUNT DATE: May 23, 2007 START TIME: 7:00 AM LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Wednesday END TIME: 9:00 AM COUNT ID: MCB/5 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Dougherty Road Monterey Drive Monterey Drive Left Thru R" ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 7:00 7:15 558 2 170 0 0 383 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7:15 7:30 581 1 144 0 0 435 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7:30 7:45 605 2 176 0 0 426 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7:45 8:00 658 3 190 0 0 463 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 8:00 8:15 548 0 147 0 0 396 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 8:15 8:30 417 0 109 0 0 302 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 8:30 8:45 593 4 145 0 0 438 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 8:45 9:00 501 4 136 0 0 355 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Total 13 1080 0 0 2844 2 0 0 20 0 0 0' HOURLY 7:00 8:00 2402 9 679 0 0 1707 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 7:15 8:15 2391 6 656 0 0 1721 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 7:30 8:30 2228 5 621 0 0 1588 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 7:45 8:45 2215 8 590 0 0 1600 2 0 0 15 0 0 0 8:00 9:00 2058 9 537 0 0 1491 2 0 0 19 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 7:00 8:00 2402 9 679 0 0 1707 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 ey Movement 0.4% 28.3% 0.0% 0.0% 71.1% 0.0% By Approach 28.6% 71.1% t` ~~ o L ~l 0-' Left In 8 Thru ~ 9 8 Right rn o ~ 0 7 L JInF V Southbound e a PHF = 0.91 N A W 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% D.0 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0 N J Right ~ In m g ~ Thru C 4 OUt Left r m x m Northbound c rn cn to A ~' rn ~ 1= Data File: Dougherty_Monterey - TMC (AM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 1 ~~~ ~- X55 PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Monterey Dr TYPE: Stop Sign *~enwaut.rcrao Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 ~(p:/Iwww.fao-consu Itinq.com COUNT DATE: May 23, 2007 START TIME: 4:OOPM LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Wednesday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/5 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Doughtery Road Monterey Drive Monterey Drive Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 16:00 16:15 514 3 301 0 0 208 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 16:15 16:30 509 3 283 0 0 220 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 16:30 16:45 546 3 329 0 0 209 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 16:45 17:00 571 5 330 0 0 229 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 17:00 17:15 621 5 374 0 0 237 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 17:15 17:30 678 6 419 0 0 246 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 17:30 17:45 686 6 437 0 0 239 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 17:45 18:00 691 4 440 0 0 244 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Total 38 2913 0 0 1832 4 0- 0 30 0 0> 0 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 2141 15 1243 0 0 866 1 0 0 16 0 0 0 16:15 17:15 2248 17 1316 0 0 895 1 0 0 19 0 0 0 16:30 17:30 2417 20 1452 0 0 921 2 0 0 21 0 0 0 16:45 17:45 2556 24 1560 0 0 951 3 0 0 18 0 0 0 17:00 18:00 2676 23 1670 0 0 966 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 17:00 18:00 2676 23 1670 0 0 966 3 0 0 14 0 0 t) r nynnovemem u.ar bL.4%° U.U%o UA%o JO.I"/° U.I%o V.V"/° V.u'/o v.oio V.uio u.vi° v.vi° By Approach 63.3% 36.2% 0.5% 0.0% O cl ~ OI ~ rn M r~0 rn h ~ ~ ~ ~ J Southbound Left ~ ~ Right In 9 ~ In 14 ~ $ 0 Thru IJ~ a PHF = 0.97 g ~ Thru ~ ~ W o Out w °~ Out 26 14 Right ~j, , ~ Left Northbound ~ ~ m ~' m ~ ~ N ~ W V O ~lO ~i~ O W Data File: Dougherty_MOnterey - TMC (PM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 2 Co~ ~1 ~ X155 PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Scarlett Dr TYPE: Traffic Signal ~_ ~O1t811 L4"#IG Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto:!/www.fao-consu Iting.com COUNT DATE: May 23, 2007 START TIME: 7:00 AM LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Wednesday END TIME: 9:00 AM COUNT ID: MCB/6 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Rd. Dougherty Rd. Scarlett Dr. Scarlett Dr. Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 7:00 7:15 558 4 164 1 1 359 3 3 0 15 6 0 1 7:15 7:30 581 2 169 1 2 377 1 3 0 18 5 0 1 7:30 7:45 680 3 181 2 2 458 2 3 0 23 3 1 2 7:45 8:00 669 4 177 1 2 453 1 2 0 17 9 0 2 8:00 8:15 599 2 176 3 1 386 2 2 0 16 ~ 9 0 2 8:15 8:30 666 4 167 1 2 454 1 10 0 18 5 0 3 8:30 8:45 566 2 156 2 2 374 4 2 0 15 6 0 1 8:45 9:00 593 8 178 2 1 364 2 3 0 14 18 0 2 Total 23 1190 ' 12 13 2861 15 26 0 122 4d 1 13 HOURLY 7:00 8:00 2488 14 691 5 8 1647 8 12 0 73 24 1 6 7:15 8:15 2529 12 703 8 8 1674 6 11 0 74 26 1 8 7:30 8:30 2614 14 701 8 8 1751 6 17 0 74 26 1 10 7:45 8:45 2500 13 676 8 8 1667 9 16 0 66 29 0 9 8:00 9:00 2424 16 677 9 6 1578 10 17 0 63 39 0 9 PEAK HOUR 7:30 8:30 2614 14 701 8 8 1751 6 17 0 74 26 1 10 r nymovemenc u.b7o zti.rsio 0.3~o u.3io ti/.uio u.zi By Approach 27.6 % 67.5% c~ ~ (D t O~ 17 Left In 91 Thru ~ Out 21 74 Right 5I ro O ~ rn r 7 L H Southbound e .o° PHF = 0.96 N A W Northbound r ~ m ~ ~ c J A ~ ~ IO O U./% U.V% 'L.ti% 1.V% U.U% 0.4% 3.5% 1.4% ao d J Right 10 ~ In H G~ 36 Thru 1 C a OUt 15 Left 26 v N ~ Data File: Dougherty_Scarlett - TMC (AM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 1 1~5° "F" ~t55 PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Scarlett Dr TYPE: Traffic Signal GOKSUi76N6 Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto://www.fao-consulting.com COUNT DATE: May 23, 2007 START TIME: 4:OOPM LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Wednesday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/6 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Dougherty Road Doughtery Road Scarlett Dr. Scarlett Dr. Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 16:00 16:15 601 4 207 1 1 359 3 3 0 15 6 0 1 16:15 16:30 603 2 191 1 2 377 1 3 0 18 5 1 1 16:30 16:45 703 12 415 2 2 255 2 0 0 5 5 0 4 16:45 17:00 618 16 344 1 1 240 2 0 0 9 5 0 0 17:00 17:15 672 14 420 5 0 219 3 1 0 6 3 0 0 17:15 17:30 751 9 431 3 1 284 6 2 0 6 6 1 1 17:30 17:45 761 25 456 3 0 250 8 1 0 15 2 0 1 17:45 18:00 T58 14 447 6 1 271 2 2 0 6 5 0 2 Total 95 2910 24 8 2254 28 13- 0 81 40 2 11 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 2525 34 1156 5 6 1231 9 6 0 47 23 1 6 16:15 17:15 2596 44 1369 10 5 1091 9 4 0 39 19 1 5 16:30 17:30 2744 50 1609 12 4 998 14 3 0 27 20 1 5 16:45 17:45 2802 63 1651 13 2 992 19 4 0 36 17 1 2 17:00 18:00 2941 61 1754 18 2 1023 19 6 0 34 17 1 4 PEAK HOUR 17:00 18:00 2941 61 1754 18 2 1023 19 6 0 34 17 1 4 tly MOVeRIen[ Z.l %o O`J.b%o U.O%o u.l %o Jv.B%o V.~7o v.c io v.u io i.<io u.u-io - ~. i io By Approach 62.3% 35.5% 1.4% 0.8% ~n u~ ~i ~ o~ ;~ N M o ~ ~ ~ J Southbound 6 Left ~ ~ Right 4 In ~ ~ In 41 ~ ~ 22 Thru IJ1 a PHF = 0.97 g ~~ Thru 1 » c w o Out w ° Out 81 20 34 Right ~ ~ Left 17 Northbound ~ ~ m ~ ~c ~ c ~ 0) J -~ N Oo A Icy W ~~ Data File: Dougherty_Scarlett - TMC (PM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 2 ~s ~ ~f- ass --_. _ ~~a~~~~~N~ Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto://www fao-consultinn rnm PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 23, 2007 COUNT DAY: Wednesday INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Sierra Ln. START TIME: 7:00 AM END TIME: 9:00 AM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT ID: MCB/7 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Begin End Total Dou he Rd. Westbound 9 rtY Dougherty Rd. Sierra Ln. Sierra Ln. Left Thru R' ht Leff Thru Ri ht LeR Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 7:00 7:15 510 21 149 0 0 311 15 7:15 7:30 654 24 164 4 0 6 1 2 0 7:30 7:45 650 38 155 6 2 408 19 6 2 8 3 1 0 7:45 8:00 710 33 166 1 6 6 1 0 8:00 8:15 636 44 146 5 3 452 24 6 0 15 5 0 0 8:15 8:30 676 35 151 4 3 390 17 13 1 15 2 0 1 3 1 433 25 5 0 14 4 4 8:30 8:45 533 27 128 3 1 340 16 2 0 8:45 9:00 598 45 154 1 10 4 1 0 0 1 357 16 4 0 14 5 1 0 Total 222 1059 30 13 2763 123 43 5 7d 27 1p ~ 7:00 8:00 2524 116 634 19 HOURLY 7:15 8:15 2651 138 8 1601 65 23 3 35 16 4 0 7:30 8:30 2673 150 618 24 11 1680 68 31 4 44 17 19 10 1683 85 2 1 7:45 8:45 2555 139 590 1B 31 2 50 18 5 1 8:00 9:00 2443 151 579 9 1615 81 27 2 54 16 5 1 11 6 1519 74 25 2 53 16 6 1 7:30 8:30 .2673 PEAK HOUR 150 618 19 1D 1683 85 31 2 By Movement 5.6% 23.1% 50 18 5 1 0.7% 0.4% 63.0% 3.2% 1.2% 0.1% 1.9% 0.7% 0.2% 0.0% By Approach 29.5% 66.5% 3.1% o 0.9 ci ~ ~I `O O ~p M 00 ~ _O ~ L ~ ~ IIrF''I~- J V Southbound 31 Left Right 1 In 84 'c In ~ ~ 2 Thru ~ a PHF = 0.94 c 25 ~~ Thru 5 8 ° Out w e 240 c 50 Right ~ ~ 31 Left 18 Northbound r- ~ ~ c tO ~ ~ o ~ ~ N IS ~ I~ Data File: Dougherty_Sierra - TMC (AM) Printed:8/17!2007 Page:1 Tel: (916) 910-2620lFax: (916) 676-4883 httr•/h"^•^ ~ fao-consultina.com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 23, 2007 COUNT DAY: Wednesday n START TIME: 4:OOPM END TIME: 6:00 PM INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Sierra Ln. w LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT ID: MCBl7 TYPE: Traffic Signal Southbound Eastbound Westbound Northbound Sierra Ln. Begin End Total Dougherty Road Doughtery Road Sierra Ln. Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri 24 Le 3 ThruO Ri h2 16:00 16:15 576 17 259 9 2 237 11 12 1 1 0 12 0 23 4 16:15 16:30 636 13 343 4 3 225 9 2 ~ 16:30 16:45 625 15 302 4 2 238 12 10 1 19 8 2 1 16:45 17:00 610 12 298 5 5 230 13 16 0 1 1 17:00 17:15 692 12 358 1 2 227 16 33 0 35 5 4 1 258 11 24 0 30 3 1 17:15 17:30 769 11 424 2 17:30 17:45 813 4 482 3 2 263 15 14 2 20 4 3 0 wr 1 243 14 16 2 20 6 1 3 17:45 18:00 775 21 438 8 6 204 41 10 14 Total 105 2905 36 19 1921 100 136 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 2447 57 1202 23 13 930 44 49 2 98 21 3 109 24 4 4 16:15 17:15 2563 51 1301 15 13 920 49 71 1 117 23 4 9 3~. 16:30 17:30 2696 49 1382 13 11 954 51 83 2 105 20 8 6 16:45 17:45 2884 39 1562 12 11 978 55 87 4 106 19 6 9 wr 17:00 18:00 3049 48 1703 14 pEAK HOUR 56 87 4 106 19 6 9 17:00 18:00 3049 48 1703 14 6 991 56 87 ByMovement 1.6°/ 55.8% 0.5% 0.2% 32.5% 1.8% 2,6% 0.100 3.5% 0.6% 0.1"~ 0.3% By Approach 57.9% 34.5°/ 6.5 /o ~ ~ c~ ~ OI m rn ~ ~ rn ~ :; x Dl FL-' J ~ ~II~It, V ~ ski Southbound ~, Right 9 g7 Left In In c ~ 34 o 197 4 Thru ~ a PHF = 0.94 c G~ Thru ~ a Out ,,,, Out W 25 110 ~ ,~ Left 19 106 Right ~` Northbound (~ LJ ~~ m s ~ ~ c ~y a°,~ ~ s~ ~Io ~1= rn ~ ~ Printed: 811712007 Page:2 Data File: Dougherty_Sierra - TMC (PM) ~- ir~~$~~~~~,~ Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto:!/wwv,~fao-consulting com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 23, 2007 COUNT DAY: Wednesday INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Dublin Blvd. START TIME: 7:00 AM END TIME: 9:00 AM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT ID: MCB/8 Begin End Total ~~~~ ~~~V~~"' Southbound Eastbound Dou hert Rd. Westbound 9 Y Dougherty Rd. Dublin Blvd. Dublin Blvd. Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht LeR Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht 7:00 7:15 868 77 163 44 79 273 13 7:15 7:30 1059 81 169 42 120 344 14 4 68 48 40 48 11 7:30 7:45 956 86 164 9 61 76 48 53 42 7:45 8:00 1112 87 51 79 275 8 4 54 59 58 73 45 165 49 75 419 15 3 48 74 8:00 8:15 1015 89 170 53 77 318 14 56 79 42 8:15 8:30 1138 91 160 48 78 441 11 12 51 74 53 65 39 8:30 8:45 931 88 116 38 53 309 18 13 55 65 58 87 33 8:45 9:00 956 84 147 39 83 286 18 16 53 75 45 83 29 Total 599 1107 325 561 23$0 92 53 392 475 "362 484 ..249'.. 7:00 8:00 3994 331 661 186 3540UR 1311 4g 7:15 8:15 4141 343 669 195 351 1356 50 20 230 257 201 253 139 7:30 8:30 4220 353 659 28 214 283 214 270 167 7:45 8:45 4196 355 201 310 1454 47 27 209 285 216 297 163 8:00 9:00 4039 351 593 177 290 1354 6$ 35 210 291 216 311 151 48 214 293 206 314 138 7:30 8:30 4220 PEAK HOUR 353 659 201 310 1454 47 By Movement o 27 209 285 216 .297 163 °~ BYAPProach 8'4~ 15.6% 4.8% 7.3% 34.5% 1.1% 28.7% 0.6% 5.0% 6.8% 5.1% 7.0% 3.9% 42.9% 12.3% 16.0% c~ ~ rjI ~ ~ o v .- r~ N rn r ~ lZ' i"_ J Southbound 27 Left i~ Right 163 521 ~° 209 Thru ' ~ In ~ N PHF = 0.93 0 ~ Thru 297 676 Out m ~ w ~ 696 a Out 285 Right ~ ~ 720 Left 216 Northbound r- -.~ ~ m ~ ~ ~' w r. rn w ~ o Ut IO N ~7 W Data File: Dougherty_Dublin - TMC (AM) Printed:8/17/2007 Page:1 ~5`I °fi q55 •.-_. CONSUk.7tNG Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 hit o•/l~ ^^^^~ fao-consumna.com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 23, 2007 COUNT DAY: Wednesday START TIME: 4:OOPM END TIME: 6:00 PM INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and Dublin Blvd. LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT ID: MCB/8 TYPE: Traffic Signal Southbound Eastbound .Westbound Northbound Dublin Blvd. Dou hte Road Dublin Blvd. Begin End Total Dougherty Road 9 rY Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru- Ri ht 16:00 16:15 1302 106 193 51 77 194 15 18 199 117 102 147 83 16:15 16:30 1283 89 244 55 79 156 16 38 120 100 117 184 85 16:30 16:45 1426 85 276 58 100 189 17 14 205 124 96 176 87 16:45 17:00 1341 98 264 60 99 134 15 25 201 139 88 146 74 17:00 17:15 1561 126 276 58 108 192 17 24 272 162 59 151 116 17:15 17:30 1364 130 268 57 87 149 21 43 185 102 69 174 110 17:30 17:45 1379 117 252 60 79 169 19 17:45 18:00 1380 88 250 60 66 161 24 40 183 120 85 181 123 Total 838 2023 459 695. 1344 145 225 1541 966 '674 1332 795' HOURLY 16:00 17:00 5352 377 977 224 355 673 63 94 725 480 403 653 328 100 798 525 360 657 361 16:15 17:15 5611 398 1061 230 386 671 65 16:30 17:30 5693 438 1084 233 393 663 71 87 853 528 302 646 394 16:45 17:45 5645 470 1060 235 373 644 73 116 834 506 274 644 418 17:00 18:00 5684 461 1046 235 PEAK HOUR 81 131 815 486 271 679 467 16:30 17:30 5693 43°8 190 a33 6.93 116.6°3 1.2% 1.87 1eo3 s.3°8 5O°2 1636 fi94 By Movement ° 19.8% 25.8 % 23.6% % By Approach 30.8 /o r ~ 51~ old M ~ r ~ ~ Cn i=- J Southbound Right 394 g7 Left In In c m 1342 1468 853 Thru ~ ~ PHF = 0.91 c ~ Thru 646 ie 'a Out out w 1479 1155 ~ ~ Left 302 52g Right Northbound Q ;tl r ~ cc ~ c ? N A O W W OD W aD A ~ IO ~ h A ~ Printed:8/17!2007 Page:2 Data File: Dougherty_Dublin -TMC (PM) ~~~~ °~' z,. ~~,~rg~~.~t~~ Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto://www fao-con itina om PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 24, 2007 INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and I-580 WB OFF RAMPS START TIME: 7:00 AM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA Begin End Total Dougherty Rd. Leff Thru 7:00 7:15 665 0 163 7:15 7:30 797 0 174 7:30 7:45 932 0 200 7:45 8:00 1009 0 234 8:00 8:15 984 0 170 8:15 8:30 867 0 138 8:30 8:45 850 0 149 8:45 9:00 809 0 132 Total 0 1228 7:00 8:00 3404 0 770 7:15 8:15 3722 0 778 7:30 8:30 3792 0 743 7:45 8:45 3709 0 691 8:00 9:00 3509 0 589 7:30. 8:30 3792 0 743 By Movement 0.0% 19.6% By Approach 25.1% Dougherty R R' ht Leff Thru 42 0 150 33 0 224 44 0 290 53 0 343 65 0 359 47 0 268 51 0 283 58 0 281 335 0 1917 HOURLY 171 0 1007 195 0 1216 209 0 1260 216 0 1253 222 0 1190 PEA K HOUR COUNT DAY: Thursday END TIME: 9:00 AM COUNT ID: MCB/9 eastbound Westbound d• 1-580 WB Off Ramp I-580 WB Off Ramp Ri ht Leff Thru Ri ht Leff Thru Ri ht 136 0 0 0 60 0 115 155 0 0 0 77 0 134 170 0 0 0 103 0 124 149 0 0 0 113 0 119 183 0 0 0 106 0 100 216 0 0 0 105 0 g2 151 0 0 0 100 0 116 149 0 0 0 99 0 91 ..1161 0 0 0 663 0 ""799 611 0 0 0 353 0 492 658 0 0 0 399 0 477 719 0 0 0 426 0 435 700 0 0 0 423 0 426 700 0 0 0 409 0 399 209 0 1260 719 0 0 0 426 0 435 0.0/0 0.0/0 11.2/0 0.0% 11.5% 52.2% 0.0% 22.7% m ~ c~ ~ 5I tn- O rn ~ n ~ F J H Southbound Left -~5' ~ Right 435 In c ~ In ~ m Thru I--"-'~ ~° PHF = 0.94 c 861 G-=-t Thru w ~ 719 n Out Right ~ ~ 209 Left 426 Northbound m ~ ~ ~ c ~ A N W O ~ lO j ~~ Data File: Dougherty_I580 W B Ramps - TMC (AM) Printed:8/17/2007 Page:1 ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ._. cows~trtp~ Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto'//wwwfao-consulting com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 24, 2007 COUNT DAY: Thursday INTERSECTION: Dougherty Rd. and I-580 WB OFF RAMPS START TIME: 4:OOPM END TIME: 6:00 PM TvaF~ Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT ID: MCB/9 rn ~I M r V L 01 Left In Thru ~ Out 514 Right m 5I o O N O 7 L JIH' V Southbound ~° PHF = 0.88 w m Northbound C N Q) A v lO C71 N J Right 445 In 695 c ~ Thru 'a Out 441 Left 251 .~.. A A J '~ O T Printed: 8117/2007 Page:2 Data File: Dougherty_I580 W B Ramps - TMC (PM) By Movement ~.u ~o ~`• "" "'-" - - 0 0.0% ~ ~• ~ By Approach 43.3% 39.1 /o (~5'I ~f 955 ~~~~CBMR$ULTtMG. ,,... Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 httn:/lwwwfao-con ~Itina om PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 24, 2007 COUNT DAY: Thursday INTERSECTION: Hopyard Rd. and I-580 EB Off Ramp START TIME: 7:00 AM END TIME: 9:00 AM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT ID: MCB/10 Begin End Total Northbound Southbound Eastbound Hopyard Rd. Westbound Hopyard Rd. I-580 EB Off Ramp I-580 EB Off Ramp Left Thru R" ht Leff Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 7:00 7:15 765 0 120 36 0 294 42 7:15 7:30 738 0 116 30 0 286 44 123 0 138 p 0 0 7:30 7:45 848 0 120 41 0 275 56 134 0 222 0 0 0 7:45 8:00 956 0 136 49 0 350 7p 0 0 8:00 8:15 908 0 102 46 0 345 70 104 0 241 0 0 0 8:15 8:30 899 0 125 34 0 331 91 115 0 0 8:30 8:45 887 0 123 45 0 344 79 91 0 205 0 0 0 .8:45 9:00 879 0 135 32 0 342 77 100 0 193 0 0 0 Total 0 842 282 0 2225 451 0 0 $27 0 1373 p 0 0 7:00 8:00 3306 HOURLY 0 492 156 0 1205 211 518 0 724 p p 0 7:15 8:15 3449 0 474 166 0 1257 239 486 7:30 8:30 3610 0 483 170 0 827 0 0 0 7:45 8:45 3649 0 1302 286 478 0 890 p p 0 0 486 175 0 1370 310 435 0 873 0 0 0 8:00 9:00 3572 0 485 158 0 1362 317 409 0 841 0 0 0 7:45 8:45 3649 PEAK HOUR 0 486 175 0 1370 310 435 p 873 0 0 0 ey Movement 0.0% 13.3% 4.8% 0.0% 37.6% 8.5% 11.9% o ey Approach 18 1 % ° 0.0% 23.9 /0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.0 /0 35.8% 0.0% 0 ~~~ o~m _o n M ~ ~ L ~ (A-Jr/~'I IIrF-I~~- J r J 4 Southbound 435 Left ~' Right In 1308 ~ In ~ m _ Thru G~ a PHF = 0.95 Q w ; ~ Thru out 310 a Out 873 Right ~ ~ 175 Left Northbound ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A W v W ~ N AI° ~h Data File: Hopyard_I580 EB Ramps - TMC (AM) Printed:8/17/2007 Page:1 ~~~ ~ ~5`~ ~~ -._.. C8liSUF..T#NG .. Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 ~a•/!v^^^w fao-consulting com i~ PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 24, 2007 COUNT DAY: Thursday START TIME: 4:OOPM END TIME: 6:00 PM INTERSECTION: Hopyard Rd. and I-580 EBOff Ramp LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT ID: MCB/10 TYPE: Traffic Signal ~` Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound I-580 EB Off Ramp Hopyard Rd. t-580 EB Off Ramp era+ Begin End Total Hopyard Rd. LeR Thru Ri ht Left Thru R" ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 16:00 16:15 977 0 312 44 0 268 57 166 1 130 0 0 0 16:15 16:30 927 0 295 40 0 278 48 159 0 108 0 0 0 ~ 16:30 16:45 917 0 294 50 0 246 56 130 0 141 0 0 0 16:45 17:00 841 0 258 49 0 248 65 93 0 128 0 0 0 0 144 0 0 0 17:00 17:15 815 0 245 44 0 230 58 94 2 114 0 0 0 17:15 17:30 748 0 222 40 0 230 53 88 160 0 0 0 17:30 17:45 T53 0 210 31 0 208 62 83 0 109 0 0 0 17:45 18:00 671 0 218 34 0 182 53 75 0 Total 0 2053 332 0 1850 451 887 3 1033 0 0 0 HOURLY 0 16:00 17:00 3662 0 1158 183 0 1039 226 548 1 507 0 0 0 16:15 17:15 3500 0 1092 183 0 1002 227 476 0 521 0 0 ~' 16:30 17:30 3321 0 1019 183 0 955 231 405 2 526 0 0 0 16:45 17:45 3158 0 935 164 0 916 238 358 2 544 0 0 0 895 149 0 851 225 340 2 526 0 0 0 ~w 17:00 18:00 2987 0 PEAK HOUR 1158 183 0 1039 226 .548 1 507 0 0 0 16:00 17:00 3662 0 By Movement 0.0% 31.6% 5.0 % 0.0% 28.4% 6.2% 15.0% 0.0°% 13.8% 0.0% 0A% 0.0% 36.6% 34.6% 28.8 /o %, gy Approach ~ ~ ~~N OI~ N ~ N N 7 ~ 01 ~ J ~, ~ r'~ 'I Southbound Right 548 Left , In In ~ 0 c ~ ~y 1055 1 Thru L~ a PHF = 0.94 e ~ Thru a a, Out Out w 184 226 ~ ~ Left 507 Right sep' Northbound A m ~ S x c , cn w w CIS I' rn Printed: 811 712 0 0 7 Page:2 Data File: Hopyard_I580 EB Ramps - TMC (PM) -~_ ~o~au~=,N~ Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto•!/wwwfan ~~~a~~l in9,~,,, PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 24, 2007 COUNT DAY: Thursday INTERSECTION: Dublin Blvd. and Scarlett Dr. START TIME: 7:00 AM END TIME: 9:00 AM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT ID: MCB/11 Begin End Total ~ ~uucnoouna Eastbound Westbound Scarlett Drive Scarlett Drive Dublin Blvd. Dublin Blvd. Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht 7:00 7:15 364 9 0 13 0 0 0 0 197 4 6 135 p 7:15 7:30 373 5 0 9 0 0 0 0 208 2 5 144 0 7:30 7:45 416 14 0 3 0 0 0 7:45 8:00 419 15 1 211 6 0 180 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 206 5 4 183 0 8:00 8:15 410 14 0 4 0 0 0 1 195 8 5 183 0 8:15 8:30 325 15 0 1 0 0 0 8:30 8:45 359 12 2 166 1 5 134 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 182 9 1 152 p 8:45 9:00 386 15 0 9 0 0 0 2 177 3 14 166 0' Total 84 0 35 0 0 0 8 1365 35 28 1111 p' HOURLY 7:00 8:00 1572 43 0 27 0 0 0 4 822 18 16 642 p 7:15 8:15 1618 48 0 18 0 0 0 5 820 21 15 690 0 7:30 8:30 7570 58 0 11 0 0 0 8 778 20 15 680 0 7:45 8:45 1513 56 0 11 0 0 0 6 749 23 16 653 0 8:00 9:00 1480 56 0 17 0 0 0 5 720 20 26 635 0 PEAK HOUR 7:15 8:15 1618 48 0 18 0 0 0 5 820 21 15 690 0 By Movement 3.0 % 0.0 % 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 50.7% 1.3% 0.9% 42.6% 0.0% By Approach 4.1% 0.0% o 52.3 /0 43.6% ~~ =I w 0 ~ F- J v Southbound 5 Left ~J' Right In 846 ~ m In 820 Thru ~~ ~° PHF = 0.97 c 705 y ~~ Thru 690 Out w ~ 738 a Out 21 Right ~ ~ 838 Left 15 Northbound fD 3 ~ ~ C ~ A Oo ~ ~ lO ~ ~~ Data File: Dublin_Scarlett - TMC {AM) Pdnted:8/17/2007 Page:1 ~o~o ~- X55 PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development INTERSECTION: Dublin Blvd. and Scarlett Dr. TYPE: Traffic Signal -- ,.-.. C4M9Ui.T tNG Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 httn•//~ ^^^v fao-consultina.com COUNT DATE: May 24, 2007 START TIME: 4:OOPM LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Thursday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/11 rvorinoounu ~~-° •---~ ~- Scarlett Drive Dublin Blvd. Dublin Blv . Begin End Total Scarlett Drive Leff Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru 0 8 377 4 9 266 16:00 16:15 703 28 0 12 0 0 9 379 5 8 296 16:15 16:30 735 28 0 11 0 0 0 6 347 8 3 283 16:30 16:45 677 24 0 6 0 0 0 4 391 4 8 289 16:45 17:00 722 18 0 8 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 400 1 8 325 17:00 17:15 767 27 0 17:15 17:30 785 42 0 15 0 0 0 2 387 3 3 333 12 0 0 0 2 368 4 6 329 17:30 17:45 739 18 0 3 374 4 3 320 17:45 18:00 733 23 0 5 0 0 0 47 2441 Total 207 0 75 0 0 0 35 3023 34 HOURLY 0 27 1495 21 27 1134 16:00 17:00 2837 98 0 36 0 0 0 20 1517 18 26 1193 16:15 17:15 2901 96 0 31 0 0 14 1525 16 21 1230 16:30 17:30 2952 110 0 35 0 0 0 10 1545 13 25 1276 16:45 17:45 3014 105 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 9 1528 13 20 1307 17:00 18:00 3025 109 0 39 0 PEAK HOUR p g 1528 13 20 1307 17 00 18 00 3025 109 0 39~ 0 0 ~ ~ dz ~ / By Movement 3.6% 0.0 /a 1.3% 0.0 /o u uor " v 51.2% 43.9% By Approach 4.9% 0.0 /o =1 0l ~ ~ J ~ JInI4 V Southbound g Left ~ ~ Right In In ~ ~ ,- 1327 1549 $ PHF = 0.96 $ G~ Thru 1307_ . 1528 Thru ~--~ ~ c w a Out Out 1566 1416 ~ ~ Left 20 13 Right Northbound ~ ~ ~ c w o ~ w IS ~ to Data File: Dublin_Scarlett - TMC (PM) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Printed:8/17/2007 Page:2 (,col ~- Gss ~ ~~~~~~~N~ ~_ Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto :/!v^•^vfao- ons~~l ing om PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housi ng Development COUNT DATE: May 30, 2007 COUNT DAY: Wednesday INTERSECTION: Hacienda Dr. and Dublin Rd . START TIME: 7:00 AM END TIME: 9:00 AM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT I D: MCB/12 Be gin End Total Northbound Hacienda Rd Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Thru R' ht Hacienda Rd Dublin Rd Left Thru Ri ht Dublin Rd 7:00 7:15 432 95 86 12 L 4 46 eft Thru Ri ht Left Thru R i ht 7:15 7:30 494 98 101 13 12 2 72 10 10 19 18 39 86 5 7:30 7:45 576 91 123 19 14 77 14 5 34 21 40 91 g 7:45 8:00 632 7g 144 17 6 101 16 5 36 27 42 115 13 8:00 8:15 519 55 88 18 2 77 20 18 49 35 4g 109 g 8:15 8:30 492 47 98 19 5 65 8 13 66 32 47 89 11 8:30 8:45 542 77 109 31 1 69 9 64 27 58 85 8 8:45 9:00 497 69 106 36 11 3 56 11 9 66 32 47 8g 2 Total 541 748 130 35 507 90 14 fig 55 336 15 193 49 7g g HOURLY 321 662 55 7:00 8:00 2134 362 453 61 27 7:15 8:15 2221 321 455 68 25 7:30 8:30 2219 271 452 74 28 7:45 8:45 2185 257 438 86 15 8:00 9:00 2050 248 401 105 12 PEAK 296 51 327 60 320 58 312 55 267 49 39 42 45 48 44 139 186 216 246 252 102 116 121 126 106 169 401 178 404 196 398 201 371 201 338 34 40 40 29 28 HOUR 7:15 8:1.5 2221 321 455 an 25 327 °/ By Movement ~ 60 42 c~•o% 3.0% 1.1% 14.7% 2.7% 1.9% By Approach 38.0% 18.5% 42 Left In 344 186 Thru ~ Out 785 116 Right Data File: Hacienda_Dublin - TMC (AM) ci 0 L _m d' ~I n O M u'> n M )? L ~fn'I-L V Southbound a PHF = 0.88 w N w N Northbound c A Ctl ~ IO N .c.. O u~ N Z= J 186 116 .178 404 40 8.4% 5.2% 8.0 % 18.2% 1.8% 15.5% 28.0% Right 40 W In :.. 621. o ~~ Thru 404 c a ut Left 178 279 ;U ~' a IS Printed:8/17/2007 Page:1 ~~ .~ PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development INTERSECTION: Hacienda Dr. and Dublin Rd. TYPE: Traffic Signal ~MR~C D6t SU 4T kN6 .. Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 httD'/Iwwwfao-cone~~lting ~r,~, COUNT DATE: May 30, 2007 START TIME: 4:OOPM LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Wednesday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/12 B i Northboun d Southbou nd Eastbound Westboun d eg n End Total Hacienda R d Hacienda Rd Dublin Rd Dublin R d Left Thru R" ht Leff Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht LeR Thru Ri ht 16:00 16:15 932 60 73 76 12 122 17 35 253 83 40 154 8 16:15 16:30 987 44 95 76 14 111 15 35 304 78 53 159 2 16:30 16:45 1008 64 93 90 12 119 15 47 267 95 49 151 5 16:45 17:00 973 92 106 108 8 108 21 42 271 69 23 123 2 17:00 17:15 1126 106 134 108 13 131 25 49 313 77 44 120 6 17:15 17:30 1260 180 171 181 13 108 17 62 274 65 45 141 1 17:30 17:45 1144 118 178 160 11 117 21 71 250 54 36 125 4 17:45 18:00 1104 101 165 140 15 85 19 57 276 68 50 125 2 Total 765 1D16 940 96 901 151 399 2208 588 340 1'099 :. 31 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 3900 260 368 350 45 461 69 160 1095 325 164 587 17 16:15 17:15 4094 306 429 383 46 469 76 174 1155 319 168 553 16 16:30 17:30 4367 443 505 488 45 466 78 200 1125 306 161 536 15 16:45 17:45 4503 496 589 557 44 464 85 224 1108 265 148 510 14 17:00 18:00 4634 505 648 589 51 440 83 239 1113 264 176 512 14 PEAK HOUR 17:00 4634 648 589 51 440 83 239 1113 264 176 512 14 s e 0 05 ' ' ° By Mo em nt 1 By Approach 37.6% _ _._,. ..,,,~ ~.~ ~° cy.v io a. i7o s.tl /0 71.1% 0.3% 12.4% 34.9% 15.1% v CI un'~ OI ~ T O ~ ~ r 2 or t 239 Left Southbound In 1616 v ~ 1113 Thru ~ a° PHF = 0.92 Out w 1099 264 Right Data File: Hacienda_Dublin - TMC (PM) Northbound r- -I m ~ ~ c crr ~ O p ~ ~ CD IO ou 0 .~ (.~ r a~ J Right 14 ~ In ° ~~ Thru 512 702 0 c a ut 1754 Left 176 A ~~ N Printed: 8/17/2007 Page:2 ~~ 3 ~ ~ ~~ r~~Oit'6U 4TiNt a . Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto:!lwww.fao-consultinry com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 30, 2007 INTERSECTION: Hacienda Dr. and I-580 WB Off Ramp START TIME: 7:00 AM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Wednesday END TIME: 9:00 AM COUNT ID: MCB/13 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Hacienda Drive Hacienda Drive I-580 WB Off Ramp I-580 WB Off Ramp Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht 7:00 7:15 524 0 163 28 0 64 80 0 0 0 111 0 77 7:15 7:30 494 0 138 44 0 60 77 0 0 0 116 0 59 7:30 7:45 665 0 207 65 0 91 86 0 0 0 117 0 100 7:45 8:00 620 0 206 50 0 94 80 0 0 0 121 0 69 8:00 8:15 666 0 198 49 0 94 108 0 0 0 151 0 65 8:15 8:30 601 0 193 56 0 116 81 0 0 0 89 0 66 8:30 8:45 602 0 186 49 0 98 79 0 0 0 144 0 46 8:45 9:00 586 0 204 41 0 101 64 0 0 0 117 0 60 Total 0 1291 342 0 617 593 0 0 0 849 0 482 HOURLY 7:00 8:00 2304 0 714 188 0 310 324 0 0 0 465 0 304 7:15 8:15 2446 0 749 209 0 340 351 0 0 0 505 0 293 7:30 8:30 2553 0 804 221 0 395 356 0 0 0 478 0 300 7:45 8:45 2490 0 783 205 0 402 349 0 0 0 505 0 246 8:00 9:00 2456 0 781 195 0 408 333 0 0 0 500 0 238 PEAK HOUR 7:30 8:30 2553 0 804 221 0 395 356 0 0 0 478 0 300 io oy muveinem V.v7o JLD7o tl.0%o U.U%o lD.b%o lJ.`J%o U.U"/o U.U% U.U% 1S./"/o U.U% 11.1% By Approach 40.1 % 29.4 % 0.0 % 30.5 v ci ~ 5 0 r O u'~ rn M M L ~ ~ ~Jn~f n~I J r V Southbound Left ~ ~ Right 300 In ~ ~ In ~ ~ 778 Thru ~ ~ PHF = 0.96 ; ~ Thru N C A Out ul ° Out 356 221 Right ~ - ~ Left 478 Northbound --I :L7 m ~ ~ ~ c OC N O N A ~ OD IO O v N I~ W A Data File: Hacienda_I580 W B Ramps - TMC (AM) Prin[ed: 8/17/2007 Page: 1 . . Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 httP://www.fao-consu Iting.com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE:. May 30, 2007 INTERSECTION: Hacienda Dr. and I-580 WB Off Ramp START TIME: 4:OOPM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Wednesday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/13 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Hacienda Drive Hacienda Drive I-580 WB Off Ramp I-580 WB Off Ramp Left Thru R' ht Left Thru R" ht LeR Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri hf 16:00 16:.15 845 0 314 166 0 129 145 0 0 0 32 0 60 16:15 16:30 805 0 280 149 0 122 150 0 0 0 46 0 58 16:30 16:45 935 0 305 169 0 143 208 0 0 0 50 0 60 16:45 17:00 903 0 272 194 0 144 160 0 0 0 77 0 57 17:00 17:15 .1182 0 463 252 0 155 182 0 0 0 64 0 65 17:15 17:30 1187 0 498 208 0 158 155 0 0 0 69 0 100 17:30 17:45 1123 0 469 175 0 141 132 0 0 0 96 0 109 17:45 18:00 1164 0 498 196 0 138 117 0 0 0 75 0 139 Total 0 3100 1509 -0 1129 '1248 0 0 0 510 0 646 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 3489 0 1171 678 0 537 662 0 0 0 206 0 235 16:15 17:15 3825 0 1320 764 0 564 700 0 0 0 238 0 240 16:30 17:30 4208 0 1539 823 0 599 705 0 0 0 260 0 282 16:45 17:45 4395 0. 1703 828 0 598 629 0 0 0 306 0 331 17:00 18:00 4655 0 1929 830 0 593 586 0 0 0 304 0 414 PEAK HOUR 17:00 18:00 4655 0 1929 830 0 593 586 0 0 0 304 0 414 io oy movernern u.u %0 41.4""/0 l Ltl"/o U.U %0 7Z. / %0 7"L.d% V.U% U.U% U.V% 6.5 % V.V% 8.9% By Approach 59.3% 25.3% 0.0% 15.4% W N cl r 5I ~ O N ~ rn N ~ L t N •`'Jn~ F J r Southbound Left ~ ~ Right 414 In ~ ~ In ~ ~ 718 Thru IJ~ ~ PHF = 0.98 g ~ Thru m ~ Out w a Out 586 830 Right ~ ~ Left 304 Northbound ~ ~ m ~ rD ~ c ~ ~ ~ N (') ~ O ~ N ~ ~~ ~ Is v ~ Data File: Hacienda_1580 W B Ramps - TMC (PM) Printed: 8117/2007 Page: 2 ~~05 ~ X155 ce~Kautreao Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 htto:/Iwww.fao-consultinq.com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 30, 2007 INTERSECTION: Hacienda Dr. and I-580 Off Ramp START TIME: 7:00 AM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Wednesday END TIME: 9:00 AM COUNT ID: MCB/14 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin End Total Hacienda Rd Hacienda Rd I-580 EB Off Ramp I-580 EB Off Ramp Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht 7:00 7:15 645 0 95 24 0 155 27 148 0 196 0 0 0 7:15 7:30 670 0 101 29 0 171 20 158 0 191 0 0 0 7:30 7:45 816 0 106 73 0 164 46 190 0 238 0 0 0 7:45 8:00 883 0 98 86 0 212 43 188 0 257 0 0 0 8:00 8:15 816 0 91 75 0 184 47 158 0 261 0 0 0 8:15 8:30 785 0 96 64 0 177 53 160 0 236 0 0 0 8:30 8:45 663 0 87 25 0 156 13 156 0 226 0 0 0 8:45 9:00 726 0 83 70 0 175 18 161 0 221 0 0 0 Total 0 674 375 0 1220 249 1156 0 1605 0 0 0 HOURLY 7:00 8:00 3014 0 400 211 0 703 136 683 0 882 0 0 0 7:15 8:15 3185 0 395 263 0 732 156 692 0 947 0 0 0 7:30 8:30 3301 0 391 298 0 737 189 694 0 992 0 0 0 7:45 8:45 3148 0 372 250 0 730 155 661 0 980 0 0 0 8:00 9:00 2991 0 357 234 0 692 131 634 0 944 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 7:30 8:30 3301 0 391 298 0 737 189 694 0 992 0 0 0 .o .+~~.~wmncrn v.~io i.o/o Y.V%0 V.U%° GL.J%o J./%0 CI.U%o U.U"/o JU.I% U.U"/o U.U% 0A"/o By Approach 20.9 % 28.0% 51.1 % 0.0 C~ N ~ O of W M L ~ ~ D1 t J (Y I- Southbound 694 Left ~ ~ Right In a ~ In 1686 ~ Thru C~ a PHF = 0.93 c ~ Thru ~ C m Out ul a Out 189 298 992 Right ~ ~ Left Northbound r -I ~ ~ s c W N U] ~ ~ W U7 lO ~ Data File: Hacienda_I580 EB Ramp - TMC (AM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 1 ~~~~55 ... _ ~o~$ut_1.~~~ Tel: (916) 910-2620/Fax: (916) 676-4883 httn •!/www.fao-consufti nq.com PROJECT: Arroyo Vista Housing Development COUNT DATE: May 30, 2007 INTERSECTION: Hacienda Dr. and I-580 Off Ramp START TIME: 4:OOPM TYPE: Traffic Signal LOCATION: Dublin, CA COUNT DAY: Wednesday END TIME: 6:00 PM COUNT ID: MCB/14 Northbound Southbound Eastbound W estbound Begin End Total Hacienda Rd Hacienda Rd I-580 EB Off Ramp I-580 EB Off Ramp Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru R' ht Left Thru Ri ht Left Thru Ri ht 16:00 16:15 988 0 303 165 0 164 74 170 0 111 0 0 0 16:15 16:30 987 0 304 159 0 167 69 189 0 100 0 0 0 16:30 16:45 1025 0 373 162 0 144 65 189 0 93 0 0 0 16:45 17:00 1007 0 359 126 0 154 57 215 0 95 0 0 0 17:00 17:15 1213 0 440 160 0 159 69 281 0 105 0 0 0 17:15 17:30 1254 0 494 140 0 136 73 279 0 132 0 0 0 17:30 17:45 1245 0 471 144 0 165 49 287 0 129 0 0 0 17:45 18:00 1208 0 390 158 0 176 72 296 0 117 0 0 0 Total 0 3135 1213 0 1264 527 1905 0 B$2 0 0 0 HOURLY 16:00 17:00 4007 0 1339 612 0 629 265 763 0 400 0 0 0 16:15 17:15 4232 0 1476 606 0 624 259 873 0 393 0 0 0 16:30 17:30 4499 0 1666 588 0 593 264 963 0 425 0 0 0 16:45 17:45 4719 0 1765 570 0 614 248 1062 0 461 0 0 0 17:00 18:00 4919 0 1796 601 0 635 263 1142 0 482 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR 17:00 18:00 4919 0 1796 601 0 635 263 1142 0 482 0 0 0 ey nnovement u.u"/o JbA %o IL.G %o V.V %o ic.a io o.o is co.c-io io a.v i° ..•~.o ..... ~~ ~•~ ~~ By Approach 48.7% 18.3% 33.0% 0.0% c~ ~ Q) ao M fD N L o~ Q' 1142 Left In 1624 Thru ~~ Out 263 482 Right c 0 a° w r m ~I M O N M u) 2 t JIFn• I-4 V Southbound PHF = 0.98 Northbound s c J u] ~ IO v J Right ~ In m O c ~ Thru a Out 601 Left .Z1 Q) O N W ~~ v Data File: Hacienda_I580 EB Ramp - TMC (PM) Printed: 8/17/2007 Page: 2 ~tr1 of X55 Appendix C -Level of Service Worksheets: Existing Conditions ~`~ ~ ~~~ ~ Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:22 Page 1-1 ----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- - Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM --------------------------------------------------- -------------------- --------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing Conditions AM Command: Existing AM Volume: Existing AM Geometry: Existing Impact Fee: .Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Default Configuration Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~ ~~~ Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:23 Page 2-1 ------------------------- -------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study -- - - - - -Existing-Condition - AM ---------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ********+,~*+***+***+*********+***+*****+**,r***+,~*+*~~+****~+***~**,r**+****+*+*,r,r Intersection #1 Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard ***********+*****~+***+**~~**+~***~*++***++****+*,r*+**,~*****+********,r***+****** Cycle (sec): 60 Loss Time Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.747 (sec): 9 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Avera e Dela Optimal Cycle: 74 g Y (sec/veh): ~ **,t+,~,r,r+*,r+~,t+.,r,t,t+**~**,r+**~t*,r+,r*,t~*,t+**,tte**O*+**,t+*,re*,tt*,t+*,t**t****t,t,t**+**,t Approach: North Bound South Bound Movement: L _ East Bound West Bound T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ __ ------------ _ _ _ Control: ------ -- I Protected Protected S lit Phase Rights: Include p Split Phase Min. Green: 0 Include Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II--------------- Volume Module: II------------ Base Vol: 358 456 0 0 1348 216 94 p I Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1300 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 358 456 0 0 1348 216 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1300 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 373 475 0 0 1404 225 98 Reduct Vol: p 0 0 0 338 p 0 0 Reduced Vol: 373 475 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1404 225 98 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 338 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 373 475 0 0 0 0 0 338 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1400 1?00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 373 475 0 0 1404 225 98 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II-------------- __I Saturation Flow Module: -II----'-------- Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 0 0 2965 475 1720 0 1720 p 0 0 ------------ _________ --- I---------------II_ Capacity Analysis Module: ----II- --------------I Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 373 Crit Moves: 815 98 0 +~+* +*** **** r*+**,r,r**+*,r+~*,r+***,r,r**+**,r+~,r**+**+****x,r,rx~**,~***,~*,r*~*+~,~***,r***++x~*++**,r+x~*+ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~ p a~ ~~~ Tue A r 8, 2008 11:46:23 Existing Conditions AM P Page 3-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment ,~, Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) *** *************** ************************************************************** IAR Intersection #2 Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive *********************** **************** ***************************************** (X): /Ca l l V 0.584 p. . o Critica Cycle (sec): 80 e Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Avera Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R=4.0 sec) g i A ce: Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Serv ************************* **************** *************************************** Bound West Bound East Approach: North Bound South Bound T - R L - T - R _ T _ R L - T - R L - Movement: L _ ~~ ---------------~ ter ------------~------------- Protected Permitted Permitted Protected Control: Include Include Include ~r Rights: Include p 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 p Min. Green: 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 O Lanes : 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 Volume Module: 74 8 1668 6 17 0 26 1 10 Base Vol: 14 778 8 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 00 1 1 1.26 1.Oi 1.00 ~ . . Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 6 17 0 0 Initial Bse: 14 778 8 8 1668 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 96 0 0 0.27 0'9i 0 . . PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 6 18 0 10 PHF Volume: 15 810 8 8 1738 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 6 18 0 77 27 1 10 g 1738 Reduced Vol: 15 810 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 8 0 18 0 77 27 1 10 8 1738 RTOR Vol: 15 810 0 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1 1 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1~' . . PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1.00 1. 00 1 1 1.20 1.00 1, °~'' 0 18 . . MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 10 I FinalVolume: 15 810 0 8 1738 I______________ Saturation Flow Module: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1.00 0.19 0.00 0.81 00 2 1 1.00 0.09 0.91 . . Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1720 3440 1720 321' 0 1399 1720 156 1564 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 1720 1 Capacity Analysis Module: 00 0.06 0.00 0. 0 0 0.2; 0.01 0.01 95 . 869 Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.00 **** Crit Volume: 15 **** **** Crit Moves: **** *************************************** *************** ate: *********************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~1 I ~ ~~ ~,~~ Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:23 Page 4-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Dougherty Road/Sierra Lane ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.660 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 67 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 150 768 19 10 1673 85 31 2 50 18 5 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 150 768 19 10 1673 85 31 2 50 18 5 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 160 817 20 11 1780 90 33 2 53 19 5 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 160 817 20 11 1780 90 33 2 53 19 5 1 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 19 0 0 33, 0 0 53 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 160 817 1 11 1780 57 33 2 0 19 5 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 160 817 1 11 1780 57 33 2 0 19 5 1 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------I~---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.17 Final Sat.: 1650 3300 1650 1650 3300 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1375 275 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.25 0.00 0.01 0.54 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 160 890 33 6 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~ ~~~ ,:~, Existing Condition s AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:23 Page 5-1 ------------------ ---------------------------------------------- ----- ----------- w~ Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ++ ****************** ********************************************** ***** *********** Intersection #4 Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard ****************** ********************************************** **************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.666 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle r 68 Level Of Service: B ****************** ********************************************** **************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound , Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -----~ ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------II Control: Protected Protected Protected ---------- Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min . Green : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 ------------I----- ----------II---------------II---------------II ---- -----------I 1~^ Volume Module: Base Vol: 542 624 401 310 1454 47 27 209 285 216 297 163 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 542 624 401 310 1454 47 27 209 285 216 297 163 e~ User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 583 671 431 333 1563 51 29 225 306 232 319 175 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 583 671 431 333 1563 51 29 225 306 232 319 175 RTOR Re duct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 306 0 0 175 RTOR Vol: 583 671 431 333 1563 51 29 225 0 232 319 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 583 --- = 671 431 333 1563 51 29 225 0 ----------~~---------------~~---------------~ 232 ~---- 319 0 -----------~ s ------I-- ----- Saturation Flow Module: As Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.91 1.10 1.10 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 , Lanes: 2.00 1.22 0.78 2.00 2.91 0.09 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3000 -----------I---- 2210 1420 3000 4795 155 1650 3300 1650 -----------II---------------II---------------I 3000 I---- 3300 1650 -----------I •!R - Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.08 0.10 0.00 Crit Volume: 291 538 112 116 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** *************************************************************** ***** ************ ..e_ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:23 Page 6-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level. Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Dougherty Road/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.577 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ------------~---------------~I---------------II---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1015 0 0 1260 0 0 0 0 426 0 552 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1015 0 0 1260 0 0 0 0 426 0 552 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 1080 0 0 1340 0 0 0 0 453 0 587 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1080 0 0 1340 0 0 0 0 453 0 587 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1080 0 0 1340 0 0 0 0 453 0 587 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1080 0 0 1340 0 0 0 0 453 0 587 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 3440 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 ------------~---------------I~---------------I~---------------~I---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.19 Crit Volume: 0 670 0 294 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~~ ~5 ~ Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:23 Page 7-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM Level Of Service Computation. Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Hopyard Road/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.720 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------I~---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 790 0 0 1370 0 590 0 1310 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 790 0 0 1370 0 590 0 1310 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 832 0 0 1442 0 621 0 1379 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 832 0 0 1442 0 621 0 1379 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 832 0 0 1442 0 621 0 1379 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 832 0 0 1442 0 621 0 1379 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------I~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 481 689 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA t~15 ~ X55 Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:23 Page 8-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.202 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I---------------~I------------- ~I------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 48 0 18 0 0 0 5 820 21 15 690 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 48 0 18 0 0 0 5 820 21 15 690 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 49 0 19 0 0 0 5 845 22 15 711 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 0 19 0 0 0 5 845 22 15 711 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 49 0 3 0 0 0 5 845 0 15 711 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 0 3 0 0 0 5 845 0 15 711 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 1720 1720 0 1720 5160 1720 1720 5160 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.01 0.14 0.00 Crit Volume: 49 0 282 15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~ ~ ~ ~5~ Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:23 Page 9-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study "°~' Existing Condition - AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) "'° ****************** ********************************************** ***** *********** Intersection #8 Ha cienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard ****************** ********************************************** ***** *********** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.284 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A ~+ ****************** ********************************************** **************** Approach: Nor th Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ~,, Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R w~^ Control: Pr otected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include ~„ Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 3 0 2 0 2 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 2 2 0 2 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 321 455 68 25 327 60 42 186 116 178 404 40 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 321 455 68 25 327 60 42 186 116 178 404 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Volume: 365 517 77 28 372 68 48 211 132 202 459 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 365 517 77 28 372 68 48 211 132 202 459 45 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 77 0 0 26 0 0 132 0 0 0 ' RTOR Vol: 365 517 0 28 372 42 48 211 0 202 459 45 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 365 --- 517 0 28 372 42 48 211 0 ----------~~---------------~~---------------~~ 202 ---- 459 45 -----------I ------------~-- Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 Q,,, Lanes: 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.73 0.27 Final Sat.: 4307 3300 3000 3000 4950 1650 3000 4950 3000 3000 4504 446 ~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/sat: 0.08 0.16 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.07 0.10 0.10 Crit Volume: 259 14 24 168 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************** ************ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:23 Page 10-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Hacienda Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 55 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.339 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------~~---p-----------~~---p----------- Control: Protected Protected S lit Phase S lit Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 0 0 395 0 0 0 0 531 0 300 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 804 0 0 395 0 0 0 0 531 0 300 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 0 838 0 0 411 0 0 0 0 553 0 313 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 838 0 0 411 0 0 0 0 553 0 313 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 838 0 0 411 0 0 0 0 553 0 313 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 838 0 0 411 0 0 0 0 553 0 313 ------------I---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------I~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.10 Crit Volume: 279 0 0 277 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA 1~1~ ~~ ~ 5~ .~ Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:24 Page 11-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 Hacienda Drive/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 55 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.529 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------------- --------------~~---------------I ------------I---------------~~- ~~" Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore WideBypass Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 450 0 0 737 0 694 0 .1092 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 450 0 0 737 0 694 0 1092 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 0 484 0 0 792 0 746 0 1174 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 484 0 0 792 0 746 0 1174 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 484 0 0 792 0 746 0 1174 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 0 484 0 0 792 0 746 0 1174 0 0 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------II---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.15' 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 264 587 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA b~q of X55 Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:24 Page 12-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #11 Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 42.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------~~---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 806 0 .0 1670 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 806 0 0 1670 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92, 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 0 876 0 0 1815 2 9 0 1 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 876 0 0 1815 2 9 0 1 0 0 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2254 2692 909 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 36 22 282 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 36 22 282 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 98 96 xxxxx 164 95 xxxxx volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.09 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 106 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x~x 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 42.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * E * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 42.5 xxxx~ ApproachLOS: * * E * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ***,r*****,t**********,t**********,r***********w*******,r*,r*************************,t Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:24 Page 13-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Dougherty Road/N. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 27.7] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 803 0 0 1666 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 803 0 0 1666 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 3 819 0 0 1700 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 819 0 0 1700 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1705 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2118 2528 853 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 378 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 44 28 307 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 378 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 44 28 307 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 113 108 xxxxx 178 106 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 14.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 165 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 27.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * D * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 27 7 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * D * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA L ~~ ~ ~ ~5s Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:24 Page 14-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 62.8] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------I~---------------II---------------~~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 778 0 0 1658 11 28 0 16 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 18 778 0 0 1658 11 28 0 16 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 PHF Volume: 21 905 0 0 1928 13 33 0 19 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVOlume: 21 905 0 0 1928 13 33 0 19 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1941 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2428 2881 970 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 306 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 27 17 256 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 306 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 26 15 256 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 84 82 xxxxx 131 70 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.39 0.00 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 17.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move r C * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 111 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 2.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 62.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * F * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 62.8 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~a ~ X55 Existing Conditions AM Tue Apr 8, 2008 11:46:24 Page 15-1 ----------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - AM ------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method .(Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Dougherty Road/Monterey Drive Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 18.4] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~ ~ ,v ---------------~~---------------~I---- -----------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~ I---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Vo ume Module: ,~;.. Base Vol: 9 796 0 0 1674 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~"" Initial Bse: 9 796 0 0 1674 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~'" PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 10 875 0 0 1840 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVOlume: 10 875 0 0 1840 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 ~x Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ~ Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------I~------- --------~~---------------I~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1840 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 920 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ~ Potent Cap.: 335 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 277 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 335 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 277 xxxx xxxx xxxxx t Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 95 92 xxxxx 152 87 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: ' 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 16.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 18.4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: C * * * * * * * C * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT `~' Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.4 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA A~ i. e.: 1n83 °f Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:55 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing Conditions PM Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution Paths: Routes: Configuration: Existing PM Existing PM Existing Default Impact Fee Default Trip Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Default Configuration X55 Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~1 ~ X55 - Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 2-1 ---------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------ ------------ *p Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) **************************** ********************************** ****** ************ Intersection #1 Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard **************************** ********************************** ****** ************ ~ Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.741 ;. Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh ): xxxxxx ~, Optimal Cycle: 72 Level Of Service: C **************************** ********************************** ****** ************ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound w est Bound Movement : L - T - R --------- L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---~--------------- Control: Protected ~~---------------~~--------------- Protected Split Phase 11---- Sp -----------~ lit Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I--------------- II---------------II--------------- II---- -----------I 111E Volume Module: Base Vol: 459 1258 0 0 691 126 330 0 294 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 459 1258 0 0 691 126 330 0 294 0 0 0 e1r User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 ~^' PHF Volume: 488 1338 0 0 735 134 351 0 313 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 488 1338 0 0 735 134 351 0 313 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 313 0 0 0 x RTOR Vol: 488 1338 0 0 735 134 351 0 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ FinalVOlume: 488 1338 0 ------------~--------------- 0 735 134 351 0 0 ~~---------------II------- 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: -------- ~~---- -----------~ Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes:. 1..002.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 0.31 1.00 O.AO 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final 8at.: 1720 3440 0 0 2909 531 1720 0 1720 0 0 0 ------------~--------------- II---------------~~--------------- ~~---- -----------~ !111- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.28 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 488 435 351 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ~ ******************************************************************** ************ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA L~XS ~ q55 Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 3-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.551 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 61 1720 18 2 979 19 6 1 34 17 1 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 61 1720 18 2 979 19 6 1 34 17 1 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 63 1773 19 2 1009 20 6 1 35 18 1 16 Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 63 1773 19 2 1009 20 6 1 35 18 1 16 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 18 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 63 1773 1 2 1009 13 6 1 35 16 1 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 63 1773 1 2 1009 13 6 1 35 18 1 16 --------'----~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.15 0.02 0.83 1.00 0.06 0.94 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 1720 1720 3440 1720 252 42 1426 1720 101 1619 ------------I---------------~I---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 Crit Volume: 887 2 42 18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA l~g~e °~ q55 Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 -------------------------------------------- Page 4-1 ------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment ----- ------------ Traffic Impact Study ---------------- Existing Condition - PM - ---------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ----- ------------ r~,,. CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ***************** *************************************************** ************ Intersection #3 Dougherty Road/Sierra Lane ***************** *************************************************** ************ n~« Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.619 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: B Approach: No rth Bound South Bound East Bound W est Bound Movement : L ------------~---- - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -----------I~-- L - T - R `°' Control: P -------------II---------------~~ rotected Protected Protected - P ------I rotected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~` Lanes : 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------~---- -----------~~---------------II---------------II ---- -----------~ !~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 48 1703 14 6 968 56 87 4 106 19 6 9 +~_ Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 48 1703 14 6 968 56 87 4 106 19 6 9 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 51 1812 15 6 1030 60 93 4 113 20 6 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 1812 15 6 1030 60 93 4 113 20 6 10 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 15 0 0 60 0 0 51 0 0 0 ;;, RTOR Vol: 51 1812 0 6 1030 0 93 4 62 20 6 10 , PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 a~ FinalVolume: 51 ------------~---- 1812 0 6 1030 0 93 4 62 -----------~~----- 20 6 10 ----------~~---------------I~ Saturation Flow Module: ---- -----------~ Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.60 `~" Final Sat.: 1650 3300 1650 1650 3300. 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 660 990 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 '~"' Crit Volume: 906 6 93 16 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** **************************************************************** **************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA w~ f~g1 ~f ~I55 Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 5-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.977 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- --------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Control: -I Protected -I Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 569 1166 390 393 663 71 87 853 528 302 646 394 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 569 1166 390 393 663 71 87 853 528 302 646 394 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 605 1240 415 418 705 76 93 907 562 321 687 419 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 605 1240 415 418 705 76 93 907 562 321 687 419 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 0 0 230 RTOR Vol: 605 1240 415 418 705 76 93 907 229 321 687 189 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 605 1240 415 418 705 76 93 907 229 321 687 189 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.91 1.10 1.10 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 1.50 0.50 2.D0 2.71 0.29 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3000 2720 910 3000 4471 479 1650 3300 1650 3000 3300 1650 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.46 0.46 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.27 0.14 0.11 0.21 0.11 Crit Volume: 828 209 454 161 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~ qs5 Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Pa e 6-1 g ------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Dougherty Road/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.555 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: p, Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L.- T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1552 0 0 1049 0 0 0 0 251 0 573 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1552 0 0 1049 0 0 0 0 251 0 573 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Volume: 0 1764 0 0 1192 0 0 0 0 285 0 651 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1764 0 0 1192 0 0 0 0 285 0 651 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1764 0 0 1192 0 0 0 0 285 0 651 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1764 0 0 1192 0 0 0 0 285 0 651 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2:00 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 3440 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.34 0.00 .0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.21 Crit Volume: 0 596 0 326 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~; W ~,Bq ~f- qs5 Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr B, 2008 20:01:56 Page 7-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hopyard Road/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.712 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I---------------I~---------------II---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------II=--------------I~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1811 0 0 1049 0 832 0 995 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1811 0 0 1049 0 832 0 995 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 1927 0 0 1116 0 885 0 1059 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1927 0 0 1116 0 885 0 1059 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1927 0 0 1116 0 885 0 1059 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1927 0 0 1116 0 885 0 1059 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------II---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.22. 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 642 0 529 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~O9o ~- X55 Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 8-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #7 Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.387 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 109 0 39 0 0 0 9 1528 13 20 1307 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 109 0 39 0 0 0 9 1528 13 20 1307 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 114 0 41 0 0 0 9 1592 14 21 1361 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 114 0 41 0 0 0 9 1592 14 21 1361 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 114 0 20 0 0 0 9 1592 0 21 1361 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 114 0 20 0 0 0 9.1592 0 21 1361 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 1720 1720 0 1720 5160 1720 1720 5160 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.31 0.00 0.01 0.26 0.00 Crit Volume: 114 0 531 21 Crit Moves: **** **** **** r******************************************************************************* Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~`-~ bf ass Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 9-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.540 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 3 0 2 0 2 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 2 2 0 2 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 505 648 589 51 440 83 239 1113 488 196 512 14 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 505 648 589 51 440 83 239 1113 488 196 512 14 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 549 704 640 55 478 90 260 1210 530 213 557 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 549 704 640 55 478 90 260 1210 530 213 557 15 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 117 0 0 90 0 0 210 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 549 704 523 55 478 0 260 1210 320 213 557 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 549 704 523 55 478 0 260 1210 320 213 557 15 ------------I---------------~~---------------I~---------------I---------------I Saturation .Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.92 0.08 Final Sat.: 4307 3300 3000 3000 4950 1650 3000 4950 3000 3000 4818 132 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.21 0.17 0.02 0.10 0.00 0.09 0.24 0.11 0.07 0.12 0.12 Crit Volume: 183 159 403 107 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA pia ~ ass - Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 P age 10-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM Level Of Service Computation Report ***************** CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ********************************************* ******* *********** ,~. Intersection #9 Hacienda Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ***************** ********************************************* ******* *********** ~ Cycle (sec): 55 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.444 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh ): xxxxxx , Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A ***************** ********************************************* ******* *********** Approach: No rth Bound South Bound East Bound We st Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---- Control: P -----------~~---------------~~--------------- rotected Protected Split Phase ~I----- Spl ----------~ it Phase Rights: W ideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~' Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ------------~---- -----------I~---------------II--------------- ~I----- ----------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1562 0 0 593 0 0 0 0 304 0 414 `~" Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1562 0 0 593 0 0 0 0 304 0 414 wr User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 1594 0 0 605 0 0 0 0 310 0 422 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~, Reduced Vol: 0 1594 0 0 605 0 0 0 0 310 0 422 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1594 0 0 605 0 0 0 0 310 0 422 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1594 0 0 605 0 0 0 0 310 0 422 Saturation Flow M odule: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 ------------I---- -----------II---------------II--------------- II----- ----------I IRP Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.14 Crit Volume: 531 0 0 211 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ***************** ********************************************* ******* *********** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA (off 3 °~ X15 Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 11-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 Hacienda Drive/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 55 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.550 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore wideBypass Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1796 0 0 635 0 596 0 582 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1796 0 0 635 0 596 0 582 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 1833 0 0 648 0 608 0 594 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1833 0 0 648 0 608 0 594 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1833 0 0 648 0 608 0 594 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1833 0 0 648 0 608 0 594 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 ------------~-------------=-~I---------------~~---------------~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.19 .0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 611 0 - 304 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 12-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 21.6] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 1715 0 0 981 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 1715 0 0 961 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 1 1844 0 0 1055 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVOlume: 1 1844 0 0 1055 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~---------------I~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1059 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1981 2903 530 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 665 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 55 16 499 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 665 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 55 16 499 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 172 87 xxxxx 66 87 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 10.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 221 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 21.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * *_ * C ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 21.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA (,CIS °f X155 Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 13-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Dougherty Road/N. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 19.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- -------------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 10 1710 0 0 980 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 10 1710 0 0 980 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 11 1800 0 0 1032 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 11 1800 0 0 1032 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1034 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1954 2854 517 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 680 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 57 17 509 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 680 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 57 17 509 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 175 89 xxxxx 67 88 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.04 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 10.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : B * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 260 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 19.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 19.5 xxx~x ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~e ~ ~5s Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 14-1 -------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM ------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 22.0] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---- f' -----------~I---------------~~---- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ~ Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~"''! Volume Module: ~ Base Vol: 12 1707 0 0 980 6 13 0 9 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~!t Initial Bse: 12 1707 0 0 980 6 13 0 9 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '~' PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 13 1816 0 0 1043 6 14 0 10 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVOlume: 13 1816 0 0 1043 6 14 0 10 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~-- +a -------------~I---------------~~---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~------------- ,; --I~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1049 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1979 2887 524 xxxx xxxx xxxxx ~ Potent Cap.: 671 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 55 16 503 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 671 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 54 16 503 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 171 87 xxxxx 65 86 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.08 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 10.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ~, LOS by Move : B * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ` Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 235 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 22 0 xx . xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * ,, ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 22 0 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** ~ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane, ~, ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA R!D ~, ~~.< ~~~ ~~ss Existing Conditions PM Tue Apr 8, 2008 20:01:56 Page 15-1 --------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing Condition - PM -------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #14 Dougherty Road/Monterey Drive Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.2] Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R -----p---g----~~------p---5----~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Sto Si n Sto Si n Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------I~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 23 1719 0 0 986 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 1719 0 0 986 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 24 1772 0 0 1016 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 24 1772 0 0 1016 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxxl Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1020 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 510 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 688 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 514 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 688 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 514 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 174 88 xxxxx 66 87 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxxl Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 10.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx~',x xx~cx 12'2 xxacxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : B * * * * * * * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12'2 xxxxxx * * B * ApproachLOS: Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~qg ~ X55 Appendix D -Project Trip Generation Calculation Spreadsheets Land Use Size Und Daily A.M. Peak How P.M. Peak Haw (ITECODEJ Rate Total Trip Rate In :Ora 95 In Out Total Trip Rate kr :Ou( % In ~ Out Total Low Rise artment 221 1 58 d.u. 11.80 684 0.61 21:79 7 28 35 0.72 65:35 27 15 42 Rental Townhouse 224)t 72 d.u. 10.50 756 0.70 33:67 17 34 51 0.72 51:49 26 25 51 SeniorHousin -Attached 252) 50 d.u. 3.48 174 0.08 45:55 2 2 4 0.11 61 :39 3 2 5 Residential Condominium/Townhouse (230)1 198 d.u. 5.79 1,147 0.45 17:63 15 74 89 0.53 67:33 71 35 106 Sub Total Residential Tri s 2,162 41 138 179 127 77 204 Day Care Center 565) 48 stu. 4.48 215 0.80 53:47 20 18 38 0.82 47:53 18 21 39 Internalization of Day Care Center Trips 50%Assumed -106 -10 -9 -19 -9 -10 -19 Net Da Care Tii s 107 10 9 19 9 11 20 oW sect nps 1 Notes: d.u. = Uwemng units ~ r o u.u. sW. =Students/Children 'Rates developed from ITE equaUOns wily equedon for code 221 was used to es tlmate the daily hips far code 224 Existing Counts DoughertyNentura Dougherty/N. Mariposa Dougherty/S. Mariposa Dougherty/Monterey Total Existing Net New Trlps Low Rise Apartment (221) Size: X = 58 Trips Daily: T=5.12(X)+387.53 684 A. M.: Ln(T) = O.82Ln(X)+0.23 35 P.M.:Ln(T) = O.88Ln(X)+0.16 42 Residential CondotTown (230) Size: X = 199 Trips Daily: 0.85Ln(X)+2.55 1147 A. M.: Ln(T) = O.80Ln(X)+0.26 89 P.M.:Ln(T) = O.82Ln(X)+0.32 105 Day Care Internalization (%) 5Q Rental Townhouse (221 assd.) 72 Daily: T=5.12(X)+387.53 756 2 9 6 4 8 6 12 12 29 44 18 22 9 8 26 14 48 67 115 62 52 114 3 80 83 74 36 110 v~ L~ boo ~ qs5 Appendix E -Level of Service Worksheets: Existing plus Project Conditions rti ~ ~ Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:27 Page 1-1 ------------------- ------------------------ Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study ------------- - - -Existing-+-Project Conditions AM ----------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing + Prj. Conditions AM Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: Existing + Project AM E+P AM Capital Improvement Project Default Impact Fee Default Trip Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Existing PHF ~5~ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 200814:26:28 Page 2-1 -------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM ` ----------------------------- 11R ~ ___________ _ Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) *** ********************************************************************** ******* Intersection #1 Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard ****** **************** ~. ********************************************************** 761 0 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): . Cycle (sec): (sec): 9 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Ti ~~ me Loss 78 Level Of Service: C ~' Optimal Cycle: ******************************************************** **************** ******** rth Bound South Bound East Bound N West Bound o Approach: T - R L T R L T R Movement : L - T - R L - Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Control: Include Include Include Include ~#,; Rights: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O ~ Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 I Volume Module: 0 0 1352 216 94 0 330 0 0 0 ~{ Base Vol: 378 460 owth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 G 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 ~ r Initial Bse: 378 460 0 0 1352 216 94 0 330 00 1.00 00 1 00 1 1 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . . User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 96 0.96 0.96 0.96 96 0 96 0 0 0.96 0.96 0.90 . . . PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 98 0 344 0 PHF Volume: 394 479 0 0 1408 225 0 0 0 0 ~!" Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1408 225 98 0 344 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 394 479 0 0 0 344 0 0 0 ~ RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 394 479 0 0 1408 225 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1 00 1 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . . PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . MLF Adj: 1.00 0 0 1408 225 98 0 0 ~ FinalVolume: 394 479 I---------------~~---------------~ ~---------------~ ------------~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 00 0.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 0.00 1.00 00 0 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 . . Lanes: 1.00 0 0 2966 474 1720 0 1720 0 0 O Final Sat.: 1720 3440 I Capacity Analysis Module: 47 0.06 0.00 0.00 47 0 00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 . . . Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.14 0.00 Crit Volume: 394 817 98 **** **** Crit Moves: **** **'A'********'k************tk****************7[****** ~Y *****ilf********'k*******~k********* Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 3-1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM ------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.616 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: g ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----II---------------~~---------------~~---------- Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 14 819 8 8 1772 6 17 0 74 26 1 10 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 14 819 8 8 1772 6 17 0 74 26 1 10 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 15 853 8 8 1846 6 18 0 77 27 1 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 15 853 8 8 1846 6 18 0 77 27 1 10 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 15 853 0 8 1846 0 18 0 77 27 1 10 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 15 853 0 8 1846 0 18 0 77 27 1 10 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.19 0.00 0.81 1.00 0.09 0.91 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 1720 1720 3440 1720 321 0 1399 1720 156 1564 ------------ ----------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.01 Crit Volume: 15 923 95 27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~} ~ X55 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 4-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) *****+,r*+**+**~******,r***********+******+***,r***++**~*~+,r*****+*****+*+~*+**+**,r Intersection #3 Dougherty Road/Sierra Lane Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.677 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 71 Level Of Service: B *+*****+**+**+**~**++*******++**~**+**++*****+**+,+****+*****+*+*+*+*+,r*****+**** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --II---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------~---------------II---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 150 770 19 10 1725 86 31 2 50 18 5 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 150 770 19 10 1725 86 31 2 50 18 5 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 160 819 20 11 1835 91 33 2 53 19 5 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 160 819 20 11 1835 91 33 2 53 19 5 1 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 19 0 0 33 0 0 53 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 160 819 1 11 1835 59 33 2 0 19 5 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 160 819 1 11 1835 59 33 2 0 19 5 1 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.17 Final Sat.: 1650 3300 1650 1650 3300 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1375 275 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.25 0.00 0.01 0.56 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 160 918 33 6 Crit Moves: ***+*****+*,r*************+********+***+***+*+*****~******,r*~**********+**+***+** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA 105 °~- X155 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------Page 5-1 ------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM ----------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.488 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xx Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: *********************+***+*+***********************************************A**** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Movement: L - T _ West Bound R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ -- ---------------~~------Ovl------ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 3 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 542 626 401 311 1496 57 27 209 285 216 297 163 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 542 626 401 311 1496 57 27 209 285 216 297 163 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0..93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 583 673 431 334 1609 61 29 225 306 232 319 175 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 583 673 431 334 1609 61 29 225 306 232 319 175 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 89 0 0 0 0 0 223 0 0 175 RTOR Vol: 583 673. 342 334 1609 61 29 225 83 232 319 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 583 673 342 334 1609 61 29 225 83 232 319 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.10 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.87 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.85 0.15 2.00 3.00 2.00'. 3.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 4307 5445 3300 3000 6358 242 3000 4950 3000 4307 4950 1650 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.01 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.00 Crit Volume: 194 417 75 Crit Moves: **** **** 77 **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA a Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 --------Page 6-1 ----------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Dougherty Road/Westbound I-580 off-ramp 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.585 Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) xxX~ Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L T R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Include Ignore Include Include Rights: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1017 0 0 1286 0 0 0 0 426 0 552 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1017 0 0 1286 0 0 0 0 426 0 552 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 1082 0 0 1368 0 0 0 0 453 0 587 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1082 0 0 1368 0 0 0 0 453 0 587 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1082 0 0 1368 0 0 0 0 453 0 587 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1082 0 0 1368 0 0 0 0 453 0 5871 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 3440 0 0 0 0 3127 0 31271 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0294 Crit Volume: 0 684 **** **** Crit Moves: **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 7-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Hopyard Road/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.724 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 52 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------~~---p-----------~~---p----------- Control: Protected Protected S lit Phase S lit Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 791 0 0 1387 0 591 0 1310 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 791 0 0 1387 0 591 0 1310 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 833 0 0 1460 0 622 0 1379 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 833 0 0 1460 0 622 0 1379 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 833 0 0 1460 0 622 0 1379 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 833 0 0 1460 0 622 0 1379 0 0 0 ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------II---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 487 669 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 8-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment. Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.210 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle• 29 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 48 0 18 8 0 0 5 821 21 15 691 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 48 0 18 8 0 0 5 821 21 15 691 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 49 0 19 8 0 0 5 846 22 15 712 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 0 19 8 0 0 5 846 22 15 712 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 49 0 3 8 0 0 5 846 0 15 712 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 0 3 8 0 0 5 846 0 15 712 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00. 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1650 0 1650 1650 1650 0 1650 4950 1650 1650 4950 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.01 0.14 0.00 Crit Volume: 49 0 282 15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA coq ~ q55 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 ------ --------- Page-9_1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM --------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) +**+***+*+*******+*+*~***+**+~**~*****~*****+*****+***+*+*+**+*+w*~*******+***** Intersection #8 Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.260 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A ***+*********+**,r**+***~*****+***+*******«***+*+******+**+*****+**********+**+** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --I~---------------~~---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 3 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 321 455 68 25 327 60 43 191 119 178 404 40 Growth Adj: 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 321 455 68 25 327 60 43 191 119 178 404 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Volume: 365 517 77 28 372 68 49 217 135 202 459 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 365 517 77 28 372 68 49 217 135 202 459 45 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 16 RTOR Vol: 365 517 0 28 372 68 49 217 0 202 459 30 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 365 517 0 28 372 68 49 217 0 202 459 30 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.87 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.38 0.62 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 4307 4950 3000 3000 5577 1023 3000 4950 3000 4307 4950 1650 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.02 Crit Volume: 122 110 24 153 Crit Moves: **,++******+*,r+******+*,r*+**..+*,r++*,r+*,r*+*****+**+***********,r***~+**++**+**+*+** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~o a~ ~~~ Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 10-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Hacienda Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 55 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.339 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): ~ Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: p, ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 804 0 0 397 0 0 0 0 531 0 300 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 804 0 0 397 0 0 0 0 531 0 300 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume:. 0 838 0 0 414 0 0 0 0 553 0 313 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 838 0 0 414 0 0 0 0 553 0 313 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 838 0 0 414 0 0 0 0 553 0 313 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 838 0 0 414 0 0 0 0 553 0 313 ------------~---------------II---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.10 Crit Volume: 279 0 0 277 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA `~~I ~ ass Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 11-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #10 Hacienda Drive/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 55 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.530 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore WideBypass Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 450 0 0 738 0 694 0 1093 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 450 0 0 738 0 694 0 1093 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 0 484 0 0 794 0 746 0 1175 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 484 0 0 794 0 746 0 1175 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 484 0 0 794 0 746 0 1175 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 484 0 0 794 0 746 0 1175 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0.3127 0 0 0 ------------I---------------~I---------------~I---------------I~--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 265 588 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 12-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 19.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~I---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 838 0 0 1679 3 0 0 24 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 838 0 0 1679 3 0 0 24 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 2 911 0 0 1825 3 0 0 26 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 2 911 0 0 1825 3 0 0 26 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1828 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 914 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 339 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 279 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 339 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 279 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 96 93 xxxxx 149 92 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.09 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 15.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 19.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: C * ~ * * * * * * C Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 19.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 13-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) **********,r****,t**********,t****,t,t***,r***,t,t****,t**,t***,t****,t***************,r***** Intersection #12 Dougherty Road/N. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 0.0] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------~~- ~~- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 840 0 0 1703 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 840 0 0 1703 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 857 0 0 1738 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 857 0 0 1738 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ~~ xxxx xxxx ~~ Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x~x ~~ xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 108 104 xxxxx 210 104 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x~~ ~~ ~cxxx ~~ LOS by MOVe : * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx ~~ xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA -II~+ °f ~~JJ~ Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 14-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM ----------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 91.4] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 39 807 0 0 1698 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 39 807 0 0 1698 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 PHF Volume: 45 938 0 0 1974 6 38 0 77 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 45 938 0 0 1974 6 38 0 77 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1980 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2537 3006 990 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 296 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 23 14 249 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 296 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 20 12 249 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 77 75 xxxxx 87 49 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.15 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.50 0.00 0.31 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x~x Control Del: 19.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe : C * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 143 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 5.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 91.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * ,t * F * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 91.4 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA CIS ~ q55 MITIGB - Existing ----------------- + Prj. Coaled Jun 18, 2008 10:07:46 ---------------------------------------------- ----- Page 1-1 ~. Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment ------------ it Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report ~ CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ***************** *************************************************** ************ m Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive ***************** *************************************************** ************ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.669 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 69 Level Of Service: B Approach: No rth Bound South Bound East Bound W est Bound irr Movement : L ------------I---- - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -----------~~ L - T - R ""'" ---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Split Phase ~---- Sp -----------~ lit Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include °1W1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x.,' Lanes : 1 ---------~---- 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ---------- 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: -~~---------------~~---------------~ ~---- -----------~ ~' Base Vol: 39 807 0 0 1698 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 39 807 0 0 1698 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 wr PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 39 807 0 0 1698 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 .... User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 rr PHF Volume: 45 938 0 0 1974 6 38 0 77 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,,,, Reduced Vol: 45 938 0 0 1974 6 38 0 77 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pw RTOR Vol: 45 938 0 0 1974 6 38 0 77 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 45 938 0 0 1974 6 36 0 77 0 0 0 ------------~----- ----------~~---------------~~---------------~ I---- -----------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 '"' Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.99 0.01 0.33 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 ------------~----- 3440 0 0 3430 10 573 0 1147 --------- 0 0 0 "' Capacity Analysis -I---------------I~---------------~ Module: I---- -----------I Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.07 0.00 0.07 0 00 0 00 0 00 ~ Crit Volume: 45 990 115 . . . 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~f ~5y Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:26:28 Page 15-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Dougherty Road/Monterey Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 20.6] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 846 0 0 1762 2 0 0 24 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 846 0 0 1762 2 0 0 24 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volume: 0 930 0 0 1936 2 0 0 26 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVOlume: 0 930 0 0 1936 2 0 0 26 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 969 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 257 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 257 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 85 84 xxxxx 140 84 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.10 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 20.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe : * * * * * * * * C * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x.xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 20.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ,n ~ ~s5 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:39 Page 1-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing + Prj. Conditions PM Command: Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: Existing + Project PM E+P PM Capital Improvement Project Default Impact Fee Default Trip Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Existing PHF Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~g ~f a55 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:39 -------------------------------------------- Page 2-1 i ------------------ Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment ------ ----- ------- Traffic Impact Study ----------------- Existing + Project Conditions PM ----- ---------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ------ ----- ------- CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ***************** *************************************************** ************ Intersection #1 D ougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard ***************** *************************************************** ************ Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.751 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R=4.O sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : xxxx xx Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: C ***************** *************************************************** ************ Approach: No rth Bound South Bound East Bound W est Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: P rotected Protected Split Phase Sp lit Phase ~ Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Lanes : 1 - 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 -----------~---- Volume Module: -----------~~---------------I~---------------~ ~---- ------ -----~ Base Vol: 471 1266 0 0 701 126 330 0 312 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 471 1266 0 0 701 126 330 0 312 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 471 1266 0 0 701 126 330 0 312 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 501 1347 0 0 746 134 351 0 332 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 501 1347 0 0 746 134 351 0 332 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 332 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 501 1347 0 0 746 134 351 0 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 501 ------------I----- 1347 0 0 746 134 351 0 0 ----------~~------------ 0 0 0 ---~~---------------I Saturation Flow Module: ~---- ------ -----~ Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.30 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 ------------~----- 3440 0 0 2916 524 1720 0 1720 ----------~I----- 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis ----------~~---------------~ Module: ~----- ----- -----~ Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 501 440 351 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** *************************************************************** *********** ****** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~I~ ~f ~i55 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9,-2008-14:38:39----- --- - --- - Page-3=1 ------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.609 Loss Time (sec): 9 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 61 1803 18 2 1032 19 6 1 34 71 1 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 61 1803 18 2 1032 19 6 1 34 71 1 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 61 1803 18 2 1032 19 6 1 34 71 1 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume:. 63 1859 19 2 1064 20 6 1 35 73 1 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 63 1859 19 2 1064 20 6 1 35 73 1 16 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 19 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 63 1859 0 2 1064 13 6 1 35 73 1 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 63 1859 0 2 1064 13 6 1 35 73 1 16 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------II---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.15 0.02 0.83 1.00 0.06 0.94 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 1720 1720 3440 1720 252 42 1426 1720 101 1619 ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0..01 0.01 Crit Volume: 929 2 42 73 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Sao ~~- q5s Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:39 ------------------------------ Page 4-1 --------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment ------ ------------ Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM ------------------ --------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report ------ ------------ CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Dougherty Road/Sierra Lane Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.636 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L ------------I---- - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------- ----~I----- L - T - R ~' ----------~~----------- ----I Control: Protected Protected Protected ~----------- Protected , Rights: Include Include Include Include ~. Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 ------------~---- 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 -----------~~---- 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: -----------~I---------------I ~---- -----------~ ~r+~ Base Vol: 48 1756 14 6 986 56 88 4 106 19 6 9 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 Initial Bse: 48 1756 14 6 986 56 88 4 106 19 . 6 9 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 1756 14 6 986 56 88 4 106 19 6 9 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 . 0.94 0 94 PHF Volume: 51 1868 15 6 1049 60 94 4 113 20 . 6 10 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~a~. Reduced Vol: 51 1868 15 6 1049 60 94 4 113 20 6 10 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 15 0 0 60 0 0 51 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 51 1868 0 6 1049 0 94 4 62 20 6 10 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1 00 1 00 FinalVolume: 51 1868 0 6 1049 0 94 4 62 20 . . 6 ' 10 ~ Saturation Flow Module: ~; Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 ~• Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 . . 0.40 0 60 Final Sat.: 1650 ------------~----- 3300 1650 1650 3300 1650 1650 1650 1650 ----------~~-------- 1650 . 660 990 a=~= Capacity Analysis -------I~- ~ -------------- Module: ---- ~- ---------- Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.57 0.00 0.00 0:32 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.01 0 01 Crit Volume: 934 6 94 . Crit Moves: **** **** **** 16 **** ~,,- ****************** *************************************************** *********** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~w ~{~1 ~ ~ ~5 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:39 Page 5-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 150 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.630 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 62 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 3 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 569 1189 391 393 677 75 107 853 528 302 646 404 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 569 1189 391 393 677 75 107 853 528 302 646 404 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 569 1189 391 393 677 75 107 853 528 302 646 404 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 605 1265 416 418 720 80 114 907 562 321 687 430 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 605 1265 416 418 720 80 114 907 562 321 687 430 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 232 0 0 230 RTOR Vol: 605 1265 293 418 720 80 114 907 330 321 687 200 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 605 1265 293 418 720 80 114 907 330 321 687 200 ------------I---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.10 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.87 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.60 0.40 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 4307 5445 3300 3000 5942 658 3000 4950 3000 4307 4950 1650 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.23 0.09 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.18 0.11 0.07 0.14 0.12 Crit Volume: 422 209 302 107 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA -t as ~ X55 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:39. Page 6-1 ------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM ------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Dougherty Road/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.559 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: p, ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -----=------I----------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1570 0 0 1056 0 0 0 0 251 0 579 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .Initial Bse: 0 1570 0 0 1056 0 0 0 0 251 0 579 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1570 0 0 1056 0 0 0 0 251 0 579 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Volume: 0 1784 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 285 0 658 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1784 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 285 0 658 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1784 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 285 0 658 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1784 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 285 0 658 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 3440 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.21 Crit Volume: 0 600 0 329 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA f fi _L..j~ j ~,~-- ~ J Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:39 Page 7-1 -------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM ------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hopyard Road/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.714 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: ~ C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase -II Split Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1822 0 0 1053 0 839 0 995 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1822 0 0 1053 0 839 0 995 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1822 0 0 1053 0 839 0 995 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 0 1938 0 0 1120 0 893 0 1059 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1938 0 0 1120 0 893 0 1059 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1938 0 0 1120 0 893 0 1059 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 0 1938 0 0 1120 0 893 0 1059 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 p 0 --'-~~---------------~I- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 646 0 529 p Crit Moves: **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~ ~~ Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:39 Page 8-1 -------------------------- ----------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) "}` ****+*+*****+**+***+****~*+**t**,t+t,tr**+*++*+,t+*+*~*++***,r*,r*~,t**+*****+*+***~*+ Intersection #7 Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive ********+***+*+*+********++ ~'` ++*+*+*****.*,r************+****..*+«****+**+********** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.404 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): ~~ Optimal Cycle• 38 Level Of Service: nd B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound ou West T R - R L Movement: L- T- R L- T - T R L --- __ I~ ------------ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include 0 ~, Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 O Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: 0 0 10 1528 13 20 1319 0 Base Vol: 110 0 39 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ Initial Bse: 110 0 39 3 0 0 10 1528 13 20 1319 2 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1528 13 20 1319 0 Initial Fut: 110 0 39 3 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 +!~" PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 9 PHF Volume: 115 0 41 3 0 0 10 1592 14 21 1374 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1592 14 0 21 1374 0 ~: Reduced Vol: 115 0 41 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 10 1592 0 21 1374 0 ~- RTOR Vol: 115 0 20 3 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 FinalVOlume: 115 0 20 3 0 0 10 1592 0 21 1374 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 00 ~, Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 00 0 00 3 1 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 . . . 1650 4950 O ~, Final Sat.: 1650 0 1650 1650 1650 0 1650 4950 1650 I Capacity Analysis Module: 0.00 00 0.00 0.01 0 00 0 01 0 0 0.21 0.28 0.00 . . . Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.00 531 Crit Volume: 115 0 Crit Moves : "~` Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA -gas ~f ~5s Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:40 Page 9-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.508 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: I Protected -II Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 3 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 507 648 589 51 440 83 239 1114 489 196 517 14 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 507 648 589 51 440 83 239 1114 489 196 517 14 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 507 648 589 51 440 83 239 1114 489 196 517 14 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume: 551 704 640 55 478 90 260 1211 532 213 562 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 551 704 640 55 478 90 260 1211 532 213 562 15 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 211 0 0 15 RTOR Vol: 551 704 559 55 478 90 260 1211 320 213 562 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 551 704 559 55 478 90 260 1211 320 213 562 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.87 1.00 1.00, Lanes: 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.37 0.63 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 4307 4950 3000 3000 5553 1047 3000 4950 3000 4307 4950 1650 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.14 0.19 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.24 0.11 0.05 0.11 0.00 Crit Volume: 184 142 404 71 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA 1aa ~f a55 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:40 Page 10-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic 2mpact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Hacienda Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 55 Critical Vol./Cap.(X) 0.444 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1564 0 0 593 0 0 0 0 304 0 414 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1564 0 0 593 0 0 0 0 304 0 414 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1564 0 0 593 0 0 0 0 304 0 414 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 1596 0 0 605 0 0 0 0 310 0 422 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1596 0 0 605 0 0 0 0 310 0 422 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1596 0 0 605 0 0 0 0 310 0 422 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1596 0 0 605 0 0 0 0 310 0 422 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: -0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.14 Crit Volume: 532 0 0 211 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA -~-~-~~ off- ~5~ Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:40 ---Page 11-1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM ------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #10 Hacienda Drive/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 55 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.533 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): ~~ Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R --~~---p-----------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected S lit Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore WideBypass Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1797 0 0 636 0 596 0 583 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1797 0 0 636 0 596 0 583 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1797 0 0 636 0 596 0 583 0 0 0 User Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Adj: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 PHF Volume: 0 1779 0 0 630 0 590 0 577 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1779 0 0 630 0 590 0 577 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1779 0 0 630 0 590 0 577 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1779 0 0 630 0 590 0 577 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 593 0 295 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~a~ ~- X55 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:40 Page 12-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.6] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -------~~---------------~I---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 20 1737 0 0 1006 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 20 1737 0 0 1006 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 20 1737 0 0 1006 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 PHF Volume: 22 1868 0 0 1082 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVOlume: 22 1868 0 0 1082 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~I---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------II---------------I~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1089 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 545 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 648 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 488 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 648 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 488 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 160 80 xxxxx 58 78 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 10.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * * * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12 6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ilf. ~+_ ~~ ~aq ~f- X55 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9,-2008-14:38:40--------- -------Page-13=1 ------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Dougherty Road/N. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 0.0] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1757 0 0 1021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1757 0 0 1021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1757 0 0 1021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1849 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 1849 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xx~ xxxx ~~ xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ~~ xxxx ~~ ~~ Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 170 87 xxxxx 92 87 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * "` * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxx~ ~~ xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:40 Page 14-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM ' Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 23.2J *****************;r************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 88 1737 0 0 1007 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 88 1737 0 0 1007 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 88 1737 0 0 1007 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 94 1848 0 0 1071 15 21 0 40 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 94 1848 0 0 1071 15 21 0 40 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1086 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2190 3114 543 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 650 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 40 12 489 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 650 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 35 10 489 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 136 64 xxxxx 43 59 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.14 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.16 0.00 0.08 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx ~~ xxxxx Control Del: 11.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe : B * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 258 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0 9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 23 2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 23 2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA MITIG8 - Existing + Prj. Coaled Jun 18, 2008 10:10:39 Page 1-1 ----------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM ------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.573 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: p, ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ~~---------------~I---P--------- --~~---p----------- Control: Protected Protected S lit Phase S lit Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 88 1737 0 0 1007 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 88 1737 0 0 1007 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 88 1737 0 0 1007 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume: 94 1848 0 0 1071 15 21 0 40 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 94 1848 0 0 1071 15 21 0 40 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 9~ 1848 0 0 1071 15 21 0 40 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1848 0 0 1071 15 21 0 40 0 0 0 ------------~- -----------~I--------------- ~I---------------II---------------~ Saturation Fl- Module: Sat/Lane: ,0 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: _00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 720 3440 0 0 3393 47 593. 0 1127 0 0 0 ------------j---------------~~--------------- ______~ Capacity Anal:-sis Module: Vol/Sat: C.O5 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 924 0 62 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~ ~~ ~~ ~~5 Existing + Prj. Conditions Wed Apr 9, 2008 14:38:40 ------------------------------- ---Page 15-1 - --------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Existing + Project Conditions PM ----------------- ----------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternati ve) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Dougherty Road/Monterey Drive Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.5] **** **************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -~~-- L T R ------------~---------------~I-------------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O Volume Module: 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 1825 0 0 1038 7 0 0 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1825 0 0 1038 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1825 0 0 1038 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1881 0 0 1070 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O FinalVolume: 0 1881 0 0 1070 7 0 0 15 I 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 -------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ xxxxx xxxx xxxxxl ~--------------- ----- Capacity Module: xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 539 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 492 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 492 Total Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 168 84 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 63 84 xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx ~~ ~~ xxxx 12.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * * * * * * B * LOS by Move : * * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx x xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx x~x ~~ ~~ xxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * Shared LOS : * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.5 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B ************************************** ****************** ************************ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************* ****************** ******************************************* Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Appendix F - TrafFic Analysis Zones City of Dublin -Traffic Study forArroyoVista Housing Development Traffic Analvcis Zones Exhibit 50323 6 44 50333 50770 • -50745 50324 50322 50767 0735 50321 50334 -50786 60768 50320 50313 076 50789 50315 50746 50728 ~~ 50332 50773 50772 50788 50312 50188 50301 50314 50316 ~ 50774 50782 50749 50750 0765 50786 5031 50739 ~ 50771 50790 50302 50303 50748 50311 50741 50747 078 50779 077 50317 50743 50755 --. 50753 50791 50310 50740 $ 0776 03 50737 50318 O7 50742 ' ~` 50751 50752 a 07 50760 50778 50775 50789 • 5073 503 • 5079 5030 50308 R 50762 50756 n 0726 • -5073 50732 50331 D3 507 50760 0327 50761 50326 75 n 50336 50796 507 79 50799 50793 50794 50725 50305 073 50307 50330 ~ 50727 060 50759 SD30 729 .~. NORTH Plot to Scale S ...y s 157-001 - 4/ I 1 /OB - DM - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U~ ~~ Appendix F 1 of 3 TABLE 1: YEAR 2015 LAND USE BY TAZ TABLE 1: YEAR 2015 LAND USE BY TAZ J c.T~ .~-`~' ~.S 2of3 Appendix F TABLE 1: YEAR 2015 LAND USE BY TAZ Appendix F i ~).' .~..~ 3 of 3 -- t ,1 ------.._._..... .....y.,.. ~....~.,..~..~~~y vmu MFDU= No. o/Households in Multi family Dwelling Units, TOTEMP=Total Employmen4RETEMP=Retail Employmen4 SEREMP=Service Employment OTHEMP=Other £mp/oymen4 ARGEMP=Agricultural Employmen4 MFGEMP=Manufacturing Employmen4 TRDEMP=Wholesa/e Emp/ayment TABLE 2: YEAR 2025 LAND USE BY TAZ CCTA TAZ 50301 50302 50303 50304 TOTHH 0 292 469 546 HHPOP 0 846 1500 1514 TOTPOP 0 846 1500 1514 SFDU 0 219 469 352 MFDU 0 73 0 194 TOTEMP 0 0 53 136 RETEMP 0 0 7 0 SEREMP 0 0 38 136 279 OTHEMP 0 0 0 0 0 AGREMP 0 0 0 0 0 MFGEMP 0 0 0 0 0 TRDEMP 0 0 8 0 0 50305 455 1019 1019 91 364 509 230 359 0 0 0 0 50306 50307 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 2573 141 1750 534 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 289 0 50308 0 0 0 0 0 1526 1456 104 0 0 0 14 50309 0 0 0 0 0 590 472 1 7 0 0 0 0 50310 211 638 638 180 31 157 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 50311 378 1209 1209 378 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50312 50313 50314 277 637 492 886 2007 1574 886 2007 1574 277 611 492 0 26 0 142 0 48 142 0 43 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50315 11 35 35 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50316 505 1616 1616 505 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 50317 667 2134 2134 667 0 0 0 231 0 0 1322 736 50318 0 0 0 0 0 2618 329 0 0 0 0 0 50319 271 542 542 0 271 7 7 0 0 0 0 50320 728 1663 1663 173 555 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50321 1112 2398 2398 145 967 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50322 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50323 697 2230 2230 697 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50324 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50325 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50326 0 0 0 0 0 1179 1179 0 0 0 0 0 50327 300 600 600 0 300 6685 85 6600 0 0 339 33 50328 0 0 0 0 0 572 200 0 0 0 0 122 50329 0 0 0 0 0 337 215 0 93 0 0 0 0 50330 0 0 0 0 0 594 301 2 483 0 0 0 50331 0 0 0 0 0 593 110 0 0 0 0 0 50332 314 1004 1004 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50333 432 1356 1356 410 22 48 48 0 0 0 0 50334 666 2131 2131 666 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50336 0 0 0 0 0 2825 2825 0 0 0 0 0 50602 304 608 608 0 304 1308 430 878 0 0 0 0 0 50725 466 1491 1491 466 0 74 74 1 of 3 Appendix F L rQ 9 l51 TABLE 2: YEAR 2025 LAND USE BY TAZ CCTA TAZ TOTHH HHPOP TOTPOP SFD _ 50726 370 1184 1184 U MFDU TOTEMP RETEMP SEREMP OTHEMP AGREMP MFGEMP TRDEMP 50727 246 492 492 370 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50728 380 1216 1216 0 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50729 0 0 0 380 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50730 0 0 0 0 0 447 0 329 0 0 118 0 50731 0 0 0 0 0 540 210 330 0 0 0 0 50732 0 0 0 0 419 419 0 0 0 0 0 50733 0 0 0 0 0 0 523 523 0 0 0 0 0 50734 0 0 0 0 0 437 390 47 0 0 0 0 50735 175 560 560 0 0 229 224 5 0 0 0 0 50736 0 0 0 175 0 28 0 28 0 0 0 0 50737 0 0 0 0 0 187 187 0 0 0 0 0 50738 240 480 480 0 0 173 145 28 0 0 0 0 50739 0 0 0 0 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50740 1600 3512 3512 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50741 0 0 0 260 1340 1914 858 1056 0 0 0 0 50742 0 0 0 0 0 3122 0 3122 0 0 0 0 50743 0 0 0 0 0 1430 0 1430 0 0 0 0 50744 356 872 872 0 0 1386 0 1386 0 0 0 0 50745 120 240 2 134 222 168 168 0 0 0 0 0 50746 0 0 40 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50747 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50748 259 828 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50749 0 0 8 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50750 0 0 0 0 0 2210 0 2210 0 0 0 0 50751 277 738 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50752 295 761 738 7 154 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50753 88 224 61 143 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50754 390 780 224 7 40 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50755 368 736 80 0 390 383 383 0 0 0 0 0 50756 324 648 736 0 368 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50757 0 0 648 0 324 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50758 0 0 0 0 0 367 367 0 0 0 0 0 50759 0 0 0 0 0 2140 171 1969 0 0 0 0 50760 1500 3000 0 0 0 271 271 0 0 0 0 0 50761 0 0 3000 0 1500 2185 0 2185 0 0 0 0 50762 0 0 0 0 0 1293 1293 0 0 0 0 0 50763 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1414 303 0 227 1414 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 Appendix F ._.~ W 1 .s L~ ~~ 2of3 TAQI ~ ~. v~eR ~n~~ ~ eNn IISF RY TAZ CCTA TAZ 50764 TOTHH 205 HHPOP 410 TOTPOP 410 SFDU. 0 MFDU 205 TOTEMP 278 RETEMP 77 SEREMP 0 0 OTHEMP 0 0 AGREMP 0 0 MFGEMP 28 0 TRDEMP 173 0 50765 204 652 652 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50766 422 1350 1350 422 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50767 110 352 352 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50768 250 800 800 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50769 363 1161 1161 363 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50770 227 584 584 109 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50771 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50772 202 646 646 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50773 205 656 656 205 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50774 121 387 387 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50775 1202 2730 2730 272 930 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50776 0 0 0 0 0 389 389 0 0 0 0 0 50777 378 1209 1209 378 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50778 907 2902 2902 907 0 289 289 0 0 0 0 0 50779 420 1344 1344 420 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50780 489 978 978 0 489 368 368 0 0 0 0 0 0 50781 252 806 806 252 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50782 117 374 374 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50783 0 0 0 0 0 694 694 0 0 0 0 0 50784 168 537 537 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50785 540 1080 1080 0 540 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50786 111 355 355 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50787 623 1993 1993 623 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50788 371 1187 1187 371 0 0 0 1374 0 0 0 0 50789 263 841 841 263 0 2167 793 0 0 0 0 0 50790 853 2206 2206 417 436 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50791 332 664 664 0 332 239 239 0 0 0 0 0 50792 0 0 0 0 0 538 538 963 0 0 0 0 50793 0 0 0 0 0 1519 556 0 0 0 0 50794 0 0 0 0 0 1417 519 898 4 0 0 0 0 50795 0 0 0 0 0 4294 0 429 39 0 0 0 0 50796 0 0 0 0 0 2839 0 28 0 0 0 0 50797 0 0 0 0 0 1072 1072 0 0 0 0 0 50798 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50799 0 0 0 0 0 1706 1706 0 MFDU=No.o/Households inMulbhamuyuwemngurnrs,w~cmr=r via,G,,,t/,~y,no„M~~-•"•••-•.~•~..~...r.,...~..~_----~-- -- Notes: TOTHH=Total Households, NHPOP=Household Population, TOTPOP=Total Population, SFDU=No. of Households in Single Family Dwelling Units OTHEMP=Other Employment, ARGEMP=Agricultural Employment, MFGEMP=Manufacturing Employmen4 TRDEMP=Who%sale Employment Appendix F 3 of 3 .S_ °~'~' c.1\ -~~ i ~ ~5s Appendix G -Level of Service Worksheets: Short Term Cumulative Conditions ~~la ~' X155 ~9 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:03 Page 1-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ------------------------------ -------------------- ------------------------------ Scenario Report Scenario: Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM Command: Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM Volume: Baseline AM Geometry: 2015 lanes np Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Existing PHF Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJfCM, PLEASANTON, CA ~1~3 ~ ~5~ Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 2-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X); 1.105 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --I~---p-----------~~---------------~ ------------I---------------~~------------- Control: Protected Protected S lit Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 372 750 0 0 1850 390 352 0 502 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 372 750 0 0 1850 390 352 0 502 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 372 750 0 0 1850 390 352 0 502 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 384 773 0 0 1907 402 363 0 518 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 384 773 0 0 1907 402 363 0 518 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 384 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 384 773 0 0 1907 402 363 0 134 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 384 773 0 0 1907 402 363 0 134 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------I~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 0 0 2841 599 1720 0 1720 0 0 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.21 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 384 1155 363 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~ i `~~ Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 3-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.824 Loss .Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 105 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------I~------- Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 24 1081 51 16 2430 6 17 0 84 34 1 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 24 1081 51 16 2430 6 17 0 84 34 1 15 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 24 1081 51 16 2430 6 17 0 84 34 1 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 25 1114 53 16 2505 6 18 0 87 35 1 15 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 25 1114 53 16 2505 6 18 0 87 35 1 15 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 35 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 25 1114 18 16 2505 0 18 0 87 35 1 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 25 1114 18 16 2505 0 18 0 87 35 1 15 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.17 0.00 0.83 1.00 0.06 0.94 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 1720 3127 3440 1720 290 0 1430 1720 108 1612 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.32 0.01 0.01 0.73 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.01 Crit Volume: 25 1253 104 35 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~r -~ y5 ~ X155 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 4-1 ------------------------------------------------------ Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) *+*+****+t****~*.*****,t**t*+r*~******,r**t*,r*****,t****,t*+**,t+**+*+****t****,tt*+t*,t Intersection #3 Dougherty Road/Sierra Lane r***+****~*~****,r**+****,r******,r**+*+**~*~~*+***+******+***+*~***+****+,r**+*+*** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.701 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): ~~ Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of Service: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R Control: I Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 O Volume Module: Base Vol: 256 1105 99 15 2353 90 40 2 51 51 5 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 256 1105 99 15 2353 90 40 2 51 51 5 11 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 256 1105 99 15 2353 90 40 2 51 51 5 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 264 1139 102 15 2426 93 41 2 53 53 5 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 264 1139 102 15 2426 93 41 2 53 53 5 11 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 264 1139 102 15 2426 93 41 2 0 53 5 11 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 264 1139 102 15 2426 93 41 2 0 53 5 11 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.75 0.25 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 0.69 Final Sat.: 1650 4543 407 1650 4768 182 1650 1650 1650 1650 516 11341 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.25 0.25 0.01 0.51 0.51 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.01 Crit Volume: 264 840 0 53 Crit Moves: *****+********.******,r**+*+**+**~*******+++**+*+~*~**+*~+*+*+*********+*~**+**~** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~ ~~s Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): p,7g7 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 107 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --~I---------------~~--------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 3 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 390 1203 937 365 2068 112 164 856 391 278 1427 327 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 390 1203 937 365 2068 112 164 856 391 278 1427 327 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 390 1203 937 365 2068 112 164 856 391 278 1427 327 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 402 1240 966 376 2132 115 169 882 403 287 1471 337 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 402 1240 966 376 2132 115 169 882 403 287 1471 337 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 154 0 0 207 RTOR Vol: 402 1240 856 376 2132 115 169 882 249 287 1471 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 402 1240 856 376 2132 115 169 882 249 287 1471 130 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.87 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.79 0.21 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 4307 4950 3000 3000 6261 339 3000 4950 3000 4307 4950 1650 ------------ -------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.25 0.29 0.13 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.18 0.08 0.07 0.30 0.08 Crit Volume: 134 562 85 490 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 6-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Dougherty Road/Westbound I-580 off-ramp Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.793 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 110 Level Of Service: C ***,r************,t***,r*******************,r***,r*,t*,t***********,t******,t*******,t*w** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1749 0 0 1788 0 0 0 0 552 0 781 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1749 0 0 1788 0 0 0 0 552 0 781 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1749 0 0 1788 0 0 0 0 552 0 781 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 .0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1803 0 0 1843 0 0 0 0 569 0 805 Reduct Vol:, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1803 0 0 1843 0 0 0 0 569 0 805 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1803 0 0 1843 0 0 0 0 569 0 805 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 0 1803 0 0 1843 0 0 0 0 569 0 805 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 3440. 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.26 Crit Volume: 0 922. 0 403 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA -~~~ ~~- ass Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 7-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Hopyard Road/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.855 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 157 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1227 0 0 1678 0 887 0 1575 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1227 0 0 1678 0 887 0 1575 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1227 0 0 1678 0 887 0 1575 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1265 0 0 1730 0 914 0 1624 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1265 0 0 1730 0 914 0 1624 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1265 0 0 1730 0 914 0 1624 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1265 0 0 1730 0 914 0 1624 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/sat: 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.52 .0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 577 812 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA .1~~ ~ X55 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 8-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ----------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.361 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I----------- ----II---------------II----------- ----II---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 ------------I---------------II--------------- Volume Module: II---------------II---------------I Base Vol: 109 0 41 0 0 0 16 1246 49 70 1430 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 109 0 41 0 0 0 16 1246 49 70 1430 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 109 0 41 0 0 0 16 1246 49 70 1430 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 112 0 42 0 0 0 16 1285 51 72 1474 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 112 0 42 0 0 0 16 1285 51 72 1474 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 112 0 0 0 0 0 16 1285 0 72 1474 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 112 0 0 0 0 0 16 1285 0 72 1474 0 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 0 0 0 1720 5160 1720 1720 5160 0 ----------- --------- I - --- ---II---------------II- --------------II--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.25 0.00 0.04 0.29 0.00 Crit Volume: 112 0 16 491 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 9-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact-Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.697 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R ------------I---------------~~------------- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 3 0 2 0 2 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 2 2 0 2 1 0 ------------~---=-----------~~---------------~~---------------~I--------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 568 902 201 53 989 369 161 -445 133 684 1323 118 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 568 902 201 53 989 369 161 445 133 684 1323 118 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 568 902 201 53 989 369 161 445 133 684 1323 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 586 930 207 55 1020 380 166 459 137 .705 1364 122 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 586 930 207 55 1020 380 166 459 137 705 1364 122 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 207 0 0 91 0 0 137 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 586 930 0 55 1020 289 166 459 0 705 1364 122 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 586 930 0 55 1020 289 166 459 0 705 1364 122 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.75 0.25 Final Sat.: 4307 3300 3000 3000 4950 1650 3000 4950 3000 3000 4545 4051 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.28 0.00 0.02 0.21 0.18 0.06 0.09 0.00 0.24 0.30 0.30 Crit Volume: 195 340 83 495 **** **** **** Crit Moves: **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~15 I ~- ~ 55 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 10-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #9 Hacienda Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.992 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: p 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 2189 0 0 1041 0~ 0 0 0 1683 0 314 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 2189 0 0 1041 0 0 0 0 1683 0 314 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 2189 0 0 1041 0 0 0 0 1683 0 314 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2257 0 0 1073 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2257. 0 0 1073 0 0 0 0 .1735 0 324 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2257 0 0 1073 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 2257 0 0 1073 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.003.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.10 Crit Volume: 752 0 0 868 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 11-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) **********************r********************************************************* Intersection #10 Hacienda Drive/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.897 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R --~~---p-----------~~---p-----------~ Control: Protected Protected S lit Phase S lit Phase Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1344 0 0 2528 0 1190 0 1100 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1344 0 0 2528 0 1190 0 1100 0 0 0 Added Vdl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1344 0 0 2528 0 1190 0 1100 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1386 0 0 2606 0 1227 0 1134 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1386 0 0 26.06 0 1227 0 1134 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1386 0 0 2606 0 1227 0 1134 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1386 0 0 2606 0 1227 0 1134 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720. 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 .869 ~ 613 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA 153 ~ q55 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 12-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[563.1] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1114 0 0 2350 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1114 0 0 2350 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1114 0 0 2350 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1148 0 0 2423 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 1148 0 0 2423 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------I---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------~~---------------~I---------------~I---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2998 3572 1212 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 6 177 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 6 177 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.75 0.00 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------~---------------~I---------------~I---------------~I---------------~ Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 12 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 563 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * F ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 563.1 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~5~k ~ X155 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 13-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #12 Dougherty Road/N. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[294.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West .Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 1111 0 0 2436 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 1111 0 0 2436 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 1111 0 0 2436 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 3 1145 0 0 2511 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 1145 0 0 2511 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 ------------~------------------------------~I---------------~~---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 2516 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 3093 3665 1258 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 182 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 9 5 165 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 182 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 9 5 165 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.33 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 25.'1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: D * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 18 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 294 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * F ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 294.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA 155 ~ X 55 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 14-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[1408.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 18 1086 0 0 2338 11 28 0 16 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 18 1086 0 0 2338 11 28 0 16 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 18 1086 0 0 2338 11 28 0 16 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 19 1120 0 0 2410 11 29 0 16 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVOlume: 19 1120 0 0 2410 11 29 0 16 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------{I---------------~~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------~---------------~~---------------~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 2422 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 3013 3573 1211 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 199 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 6 177 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 199 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 10 5 177 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.09 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 2.89 0.00 0.09 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 25.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx.xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: C * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 15 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1408 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * F ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 1408.5 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:04 Page 15-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions AM ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #14 Dougherty Road/Monterey Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 26.4] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~---------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 9 1104 0 0 2354 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 1104 0 0 2354 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 1104 0 0 2354 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 9 1138 0 0 2427 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 9 1138 0 0 2427 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 ------------~---------------I~---------------~I---------------~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict-Vol: 2427 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1213 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 198 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 177 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 198 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 177 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 24.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 26.4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: C * * * * * * * D Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 26.4 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * D ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~ 51 ~` ~ 55 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:57 Page 1-1 ---------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study __ -_-_----Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM Scenario Report Scenario: Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM Command Volume: Geometry: Impact Fee: Trip Generation: Trip Distribution: Paths: Routes: Configuration: Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM Baseline PM 2015 lanes np Default Impact Fee Default Trip Generation Default Trip Distribution Default Path Default Route Existing PHF Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA "15g °~ X155 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 ----Page-2=1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM ------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.001 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxx~cxx Level Of Service: F Optimal Cycle: 180 ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L T R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Include Include Include Include Rights: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O Volume Module: Base Vol: 466 1387 0 0 1198 519 345 0 390 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 466 1387 0 0 1198 519 345 0 390 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 466 1387 0 0 1198 519 345 0 390 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97. 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 480 1430 0 0 1235 535 356 0 402 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 480 1430 0 0 1235 535' 356 0 402 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 402 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 480 1430 0 0 1235 535 356 0 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 480 1430 0 0 1235 535 356 0 0 0 0 OI Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.60 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0;00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 0 0 2400 1040 1720 0 1720 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.28 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 480 885 356 **** **** Crit Moves: **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~15 1 Qf- ~~5 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 1'0, 2008 14:53:58 Page 3-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.609 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: g ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~------ Control:. Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 64 1850 22 12 1561 22 12 1 44 27 1 16 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 64 1850 22 12 1561 22 12 1 44 27 1 16 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 64 1850 22 12 1561 22 12 1 44 27 1 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 66 1907 23 12 1609 23 12 1 45 28 1 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 66 1907 23 12 1609 23 12 1 45 28 1 16 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 23 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 66 1907 0 12 1609 10 12 1 45 28 1 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 66 1907 0 12 1609 10 12 1 45 28 1 16 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane : 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.21 0.02 0.77 1.00 0.06 0.94 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 1720 3127 3440 1720 362 30 1328 1720 101 1619 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 Crit Volume: 954 6 59 28 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 4-1 ~~:, ------------------------------------ ~Ir Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study ~"' Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ~~° Intersection #3 Dougherty Road /Sierra Lane Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.489 ~; Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R= 4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: A * +**+******+*+***+**+****,r,r**** **~**************+*****+*~+**+***+ ,+****,r********* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ~; Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I --~~---------------~I ------------- ---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include ~„ Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 70 1806 70 21 1544 67 100 6 106 20 6 30 ~= Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' Initial Bse: 70 1806 70 21 1544 67 100 6 106 20 6 30 ~ Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '~ PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 70 1806 70 21 1544 67 100 6 106 20 6 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 72 1862 72 22 1592 69 103 6 109 21 6 31 ~+ Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 1862 72 22 1592 69 103 6 109 21 6 31 ~ RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 72 1862 72 22 1592 69 103 6 37 21 6 31 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 72 1862 72 22 1592 69 103 6 37 21 6 31 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 ~ Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 2.88 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 0.83 . Final Sat.: 1650 4765 185 1650 4744 206 1650 1650 1650 1650 275 1375 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.39 0.39 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 Crit Volume: 645 22 103 37 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~1~1 ~ `~55 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 5-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ***+*+*+******+**********+****~*++**++,r*******+****,r**+**++***+,r*w*~****++**+**+ Intersection #4 Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.872 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 178 Level Of Service: D *++~***************,r***,~+********~*~***,r**************+*****************~******* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~I----------- ----II---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 3 0 3 0 1 ------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 633 1647 456 281 1324 133 206 1158 535 650 1735 396 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 633 1647 456 281 1324 133 206 1158 535 650 1735 396 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 633 1647 456 281 1324 133 206 1158 535 650 1735 396 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 .0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 653 1698 470 290 1365 137 212 1194 552 670 1789 408 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 653 1698 470 290 1365 137 212 1194 552 670 1789 408 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 257 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 159 RTOR Vol: 653 1698 213 290 1365 137 212 1194 301. 670 1789 249 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 653 1698 213 290 1365 137 212 1194 301 670 1789 249 ------------~---------------~I---------------I~---------------II---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.87 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.63 0.37 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 4307 4950 3000 3000,5998 602 3000 4950 3000 4307 4950 1650 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.34 0.07 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.24 0.10 0.16 0.36 0.15 Crit Volume: 566 145 106 596 Crit Moves: **** **+.* **** **** *****+****+*********+***~**+**+***~**~***,t,r****,r*+*****+**+~**+*****+***+*~+**** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~ X55 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr. 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 6-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IRAs Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) xF *****,r***++**+*,r*+ ***+,r,r****~* +*+*****,r,r*++**,r+***~***~******+***+*++ *****+***+* Intersection #5 Dougherty Road /Westbound I-580 off-ramp ~, ++**+****+******,r* ***+**,r***** ***,~***********+w**********~***,r******+ *****+***** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.679 ;; Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R= 4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 71 Level Of Service: B Approach: Nor th Bound South Bound East Bound We st Bound ~, Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -----------~~ -------------- -- ----- ----------~ Control: Pr otected P Protected S lit Phase Spl it Phase Rights: Include Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 2131 0 0 1601 0 0 0 0 410 0 605 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 2131 0 0 1601 0 0 0 0 410 0 605 ~" Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` Initial Fut: 0 2131 0 0 1601 0 0 0 0 410 0 605 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0`.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2197 0 0 1651 0 0 0 0 423 0 624 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2197 0 0 1651 0 0 0 0 423 0 624 ~ RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2197 0 0 1651 0 0 0 0 423 0 624 ,~. PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ FinalVolume: 0 2197 0 0 1651 0 0 0 0 423 0 624 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00.0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 3440 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.20 Crit Volume: 0 825 0 312 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~I~3 ~ q55 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 7-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hopyard Road/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.833 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 136 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 2361 0 0 1563 0 875 0 1095 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 2361 0 0 1563 0 875. 0 1095 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 2361 0 0 1563 0 875 0 1095 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2434 0 0 1611 0 902 0 1129 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2434 0 0 1611 0 902 0 1129 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2434 0 0 1611 0 902 0 1129 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 2434 0 0 1611 0 902 0 1129 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 811 0 564 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~1~~ ~ X155 e Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 8-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.593 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 56 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include. Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 120 0 45 0 0 0 15 1720 60 70 2565 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 120 0 45 0 0 0 15 1720 60 70 2565 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 120 0 45 0 0 0 15 1720 60 70 2565 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 124 0 46 0 0 0 15 1773 62 72 2644 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 124 0 46 0 0 0 15 1773 62 72 2644 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 124 0 0 0 0 0 15 1773 0 72 2644 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 124 0 0 0 0 0 15 1773 0 72 2644 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane:. 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00.0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 0 0 0 1720 5160 1720 1720 5160 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.34 0.00 0.04 0.51 0.00 Crit Volume: 124 0 15 861 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 9-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #8 Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard *******,t***,t**,r**,r*,t****,r,t********,t,t********,r*****,t***+r*****,r,t*,t****,r*********** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.683 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 72 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 3 0 2 0 2 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 2 2 0 2 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 509 697 597 276 448 251 250 1287 490 298 852 27 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 509 697 597 276 448 251 250 1287 490 298 852 27 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 509 697 597 276 448 251 250 1287 490 298 852 27 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 525 719 615 285 462 259 258 1327 505 307 878 28 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 525 719 615 285 462 259 258 1327 505 307 878 28 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 169 0 0 .142 0 0 201 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 525 719 446 285 462 117 258 1327 304 307 878 28 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 525 719 446 265 462 117 258 1327 304 307 878 28 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 165D Adjustment:. 0.87 1.00 0.91. 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 2.00 2..00 2.003.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 .2.00 2.91 0.09 Final Sat.: 4307 3300 300b 3000 4950... 1650 3000 4950 3000 3000 4798 152 ------------~---------------I~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.22 0.15 0.09 0.09. 0.07 0.09 0.27 0.10 0.10 0.18. 0.18 Crit Volume: 359 142 442 154 Crit Moves: **** **** *~** **** ***,r**************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 10-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study •' Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM ----------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Meth od (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #9 Ha cienda Drive /Westbound I-580 off-ramp ~ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.822 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R= 4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 128 Level Of Service: D ~**********+***,r** *+**+++**+*,r +******+****************~***++**** *+*** +****++**** Approach: Nor th Bound South Bound East Bound We st Bound ,~, Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - - -- T - R --------- ---- Control: Pr -------- otected ------------ ------------- Protected Split Phase P S l it Phase Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include 6iK:. Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ------------~----- ----------~~ ---------------~~---------------~~ ----- ----------~ s~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1966 0 0 1417 0 0 0 0 1303 0 489 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1966 0 0 1417 0 0 0 0 1303 0 489 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "' Initial Fut: 0 1966 0 0 1417 0 0 0 0 1303 0 489 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2027 0 0 1461 0 0 0 0 1343 0 504 ~d Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2027 0 0 1461 0 0 0 0 1343 0 504 ~,,, RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2027 0 0 1461 0 0 0 0 1343 0 504 ;a;. PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj.: 1.00 1.00 1.00" 1.00 1.00 1.D0. 1.00 1..00, 1.00 1.OQ 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 2027 0 0 1461 0 0 0 0 1343 0. 504 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720. 1720 1720 1720.'1720 Adjustment:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OO T.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 .Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 2.00 0:00 2.00 Final:;~at,: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 0 0 0 ------------~ 3127 ~---- 0 3127 ---------~-I ------------~---- -----------~ ~---------------~~--- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.-00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.16 s~ Crit Volume`. 676 0 0 672 Crit Moves: **,~* **** _ **** ~,; Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA '°l l~`1 ~~ ~ 5 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 11-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #10 Hacienda Drive/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.710 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 79 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 2545 0 0 2179 0 610 0 590 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 2545 0 0 2179 0 610 0 590 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 2545 0 0 2179 0 610 0 590 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.970.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2624 0 0 2246 0 629 0 608 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2624 0 0 2246 0 629 0 608 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2624 0 0 2246 0 629 0 608 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0.2624 0 0 2246 0 629 0 608 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lame:. 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 .1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00. 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0:00' 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 ------------ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.'00 0.00 Crit Volume: 875 0 314 p Crit Moves:„ **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~ a55 Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 12-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level O~f Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ***+**+**+***++******«*+*************,r**,r+***~+***+***,r****++**++**++**+***+***,r Intersection #11 Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive r*****+**~+*****+,t**+***++*++***«++***********+**************w****,r**+***+*«**** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[135.5] Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~--------------=~~---------------~I---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 1851 0 0 1584 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 1851 0 0 1584 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 1851. 0 0 1584 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0_.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 1 1908 0 0.1633 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVOlume: 1 1908 0 0 1633 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------II---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1637 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxac 2591 3545 819. xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 401 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 21 6 323 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.:. 401 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 21 6 323 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.10 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx -----------YI-------r------.-II---------------II---------------.II--------.---- Level Of Service Module: ~£~' "" 2Way95th4: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx~xxxxx, xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 14.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx.xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by i~Eltte : B * ,r * ~ * * * * , Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT -.LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx~x~xx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 31 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared4ueue:xxxxx.xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx=-xx?cxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx .136 xxxxx°xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * F ApproachDeL: xxxxxx xxxxxx 135.5 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F ++***+*****~**********+**,r****«*+,+*+****,~*****++**+.***+****,r*********,r***,r****++ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 13-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 Dougherty Road/N. Mariposa Drive Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: FL139.7] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I---------------~~----:----------~~------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 10 1846 0 0 1583 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 10 1846 0 0 1583 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 10 1846 0 0 1583 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 10 1903 0 0 1632 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 10 1903 0 0 1632 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1634 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2605 3557 817 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 402 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 21 6 324 xxxx xxxx xxxxx"' Move Cap.: 402 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 20 6 324 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.31 0.00 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx_.xxxxx xxxx ,cxxx xxxxX ,txxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 14.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx'xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: B * * * * * + *. * * * * , Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx,:xxxxx xxxx 38 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx"xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 140 xxxxx xrxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * ,r * g, * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 139.7 xxx3acx ApproachLOS: * * F * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~ o ~ ~~ y Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 14-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[246.8] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 12 1843 0 0 1583 6 13 0 9 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 12 1843 0 0 1583 6 13 0 9 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 1843 0 0 1583 6 13 0 9 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 12 1900 0 0 1632 6 13 0 9 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 12 1900 0 0 1632 6 13 0 9 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1638 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2610 3560 819 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 401 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 20 6 323 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 401 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 20 6 323 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.67 0.00 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: O.l xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 14.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ?~~ xx7cx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: B * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR. RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 32 x3cxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 2'•4 '~'{'{ xxxxx ~~ ~~ Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 247 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * F * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 246.8 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative CondiThu Apr 10, 2008 14:53:58 Page 15-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative Conditions PM ----------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)- ******************************'~**************************************++r***,r**+** .Intersection #14 Dougherty Road/Monterey Drive ++****+***********+********w**+*~****+********+***,r**+,r*+********+*~**+********* Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 16.7] *******+*****,t**,r+***x~+,~+**+******+*~**+**+*+*+*****~***+***++***,r***+*****,r*~** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~------------- __ _ ___I --~~---------------~~------p---g----~~----- P 5 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Sto Si n Sto Si n Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 23 1855 0 0 1589 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 1855 0 0 1589 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 23 1855 0 0 1589 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 24 1912 0 0 1638 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 24 1912 0 0 1638 3 0 0 14 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~I--------------- Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1641 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 821 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 400 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx ~xx 322 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: .400 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 322 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 14..6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx~xx xxxxx xxxx 16.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ~OCJ by Move: B * *,, ~. *,.;.~ * _ + ~* .* C Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ~xxx xxxx ~~ xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * t ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * 16.7 xxxxxx "` C ,+ +*,t**+~****~,~+****+***+*****,r~*+,r*,r+**+,r~***x~******+,r ,t**********************,r**~ Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ~**+********w*,~****+*****,r+,~**,r*w+**,~**~****~*x~***x~*,~***,~****+*x~********+*+*~*** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA 1~a °~ ~~~ __~ 13 ~- f-~ ~,~5 Short Term Cumulative + Prj Thu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:29 Page 1-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM ----------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Short Term Cumulative + Prj. Conditions AM Command: Short Term Cumulative + Prj. Conditions AM Volume: Baseline + Prj. AM Geometry: 2015 lanes wp Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Existing PHF Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~ ~ ~~~ Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:29 Page 2-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ***+*++**,r*+*****+**++*****+**+*****+**++*,r***+**+,r*+**~*+*********+,r**+*****,~** Intersection #1 Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard *+****+********+***+++*****++,r~**************************++**+*********~*******+ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.112 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F *+*,r++~***++*+**+**~*~+++**~**+*~*..++**+****+*+,r***++****+****..+*+**++***++*++t* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R -------------~~---------------~~---p-----------~ Control: Protected Protected Split Phase S lit Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O ------------~---------------~~---------------II---------------I~--------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 378 759 0 0 1860 390 352 0 502 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 378 759 0 0 1860 390 352 0 502 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 378 759 0 0 1860 390 352 0 502 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 390 782 0 0 1918 402 363 0 518 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 390 782 0 0 1918 402 363 0 518 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 390 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 390 782 0 0 1918 402 363 0 128 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 39a 7.82 0 0 1918 402 363 0 128 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720. 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: I.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 0.00 1.'00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 0 0 2844 596 1720 0 1720'. 0. 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.21 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 390 1160 363 _ 0 Crit Moves: Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA 7~5 ~ q55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:29 Page 3-1 ---------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study .Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #2 Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.816 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 101 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ----------- __ __ Control: Protected Protected Permitted -II Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min., Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 24 1113 51 16 2405 6 17 0 84 34 1 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 24 1113 51 16 2405 6 17 0 84 34 1 15 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 24 1113 51 16 2405 6 17 0 84 34 1 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 25 1147 53 16 2479 6 18 0 87 35 1 15 Red.uct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 25 1147 53 16 2479 6 18 0 87 35 1 15 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 35 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 25 1147 18 16 2479 0 18 0 87 35 1 15 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 25 1147 18 16 2479 0 18 0 87 35 1 15 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 _1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.17 0.00 0.83 1.00 0.06 0.94 Final Sat.: 1720 344.0 1720 3127 3440 1720 290 0 1430 1720 108 1612 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.33 0.01 0.01 0.72 0.00' 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.01 Crit Volume: 25 1240 104 35 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2006 14:51:29 Page 5-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.796 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 112 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 3 0 3 0 1 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 390 1205 937 366 2110 122 164. 856 391 278 1427 327 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 390 1205 937 366 2110 122 164 856 391 278 1427 327 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 390 1205 937 366 2110 122 164 856 391 278 1427 327 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 402 1242 966 377 2175 126 169 882 403 287 1471 337 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 402 1242 966 377 2175 126 169 882 403 287 1471 337 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 154 0 0 208 RTOR Vol: 402 1242 856 377 2175 126 169 882 249 287 1471 130 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 402 1242 856 377 2175 126 169 882 249 287 1471 130 ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.03 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.87 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.78 0.22 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 4307 5099 3000 3000 6239 361 3000 4950 3000 4307 4950 1650 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.24 0.29 0.13 0.35 0.35 0.06 0.18 0..08 0.07 0.30 0.08 Crit Volume: 134 575 85 490 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA -~~~ ~f a~~ ~' Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:29 Page 6-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) **********w*******,r**********************.***************,r*****,r*,t*,t*****,r******* Intersection #5 Dougherty Road/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.801 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay .(sec/veh) xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 115 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~---------------I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1751 0 0 1814 0 0 0 0 552 0 781 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1751 0 0 1814 0 0 0 0 552. 0 781 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1751 0 0 1814 0 0 0 0 552 0 781 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1805 0 0 1870 0 0 0 0 569 0 805 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1805 0 0 1870 0 0 0 0 569 0 805 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1805 0 0 1870 0 0 0 0 569 0 805 PCE Adj:_ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1805 0 0 1870 0 0 0 0 569 0 805 Saturation Flow Module: :. Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 2.00 0.00. 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 3440 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.26 Crit Volume: 0 935 0 403 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~`~ ~f X55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:29 Page 7-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hopyard Road/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.858 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 160 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------I---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~---------------~I---------------I~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1228 0 0 1695 0 888 0 1575 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1228 0 0 1695 0 888 0 1575 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1228 0 0 1695 0 888 0 1575 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1266 0 0 1747 0 915 0 1624 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1266 0 0 1747 0 915 0 1624 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1266 0 0 1747 0 915 0 1624 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1266 0 0 1747 0 915 0 1624 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00' 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 582 812 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:29 Page 8-1 Arroyo vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) **********************************************************,r,t******************** Intersection #7 Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical vol./Cap.(X): 0.361 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 109 0 41 0 0 0 16 1247 49 70 1431 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 109 0 41 0 0 0 16 1247 49 70 1431 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 Initial Fut: 109 0 41 0 0 0 16 1247 49 70 1431 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 112 0 42 0 0 0 16 1286 51 72 1475 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 112 0 42 0 0 0 16 1286 51 72 1475 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 112 0 0 0 0 0 16 1286 0 72 1475 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 112 0 0 0 0 0 16 1286 0 72 1475 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 0 0 0 1720 5160 1720 1720 5160 0 ------------~---------------I~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.25 0.00 0.04 0.29 0.00 Crit Volume: 112 0 16 492 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA a !~, ~• -,~~ ~{- X55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:29 Page 9-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.698 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 3 0 2 0 2 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 2 2 0 2 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 568 902 201 53 989 369 162 450 136 684 1323 118 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 568 902 201 53 989 369 162 450 136 684 1323 118 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 568 902 201 53 989 369 162 450 136 684 1323 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 586 930 207 55 1020 380 167 464 140 705 1364 122 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 586 930 207 55 1020 380 167 464 140 705 1364 122 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 207 0 0 92 0 0 140 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 586 930 0 55 1020 289 167 464 0 705 1364 122 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 FinalVolume: 586 930 0 55 1020. 289 167 464 0 705 1364 122 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.75 0.25 Final Sat.: 4307 3300 3000 3000 4950 1650 3000 4950 3000 3000 4545 405 ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.28 0.00 0.02 0.21 0.17 0.06 0.09 0.00 0.24 0.30 0.30 Crit Volume: 195 340 84 495 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:29 Page 10-1 Arroyo, .Vista Housing Redevelopment Traff ic Impact Study Short Term Cumula tive + Project Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report ************* CCTALOS Method ( ********************* Future Volume Alternative) ****************************** **** ************ ., Intersection #9 Hacienda Drive/Wes tbound I-580 off-ramp ************* ********************* ****************************** **** ************ Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.992 ,~ Loss Time (se c): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle : 180 Level Of Service: E ************* ********************* ****************************** **** ************ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound W est Bound ~.: Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I Control: --------------- Protected ~I---- P -----------I~---------------I~ rotected Split Phase ---- Sp -----------~ lit Phase ~"' Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module : Base Vol: 0 2189 0 0 1043 0 0 0 0 1683 0 314 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 2189 0 0 1043 0 0 0 0 1683 0 314 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~. Initial Fut: 0 2189 0 0 1043 0 0 0 0 1683 0 314 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2257 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2257 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 ~,,, RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2257 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 ~~: PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 2257 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 Saturation Fl ow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.10 Crit Volume: 752 0 0 868 ~" Crit Moves: **** **** **** ************* ********************* ****************************** **** ************ eMit Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~a of qss Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:29 Page 10-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo,.Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Hacienda Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): p,992 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 2189 0 0 1043 0 0 0 0 1683 0 314 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 2189 0 0 1043 0 0 0 0 1683 0 314 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 2189 0 0 1043 0 0 0 0 1683 0 314 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2257 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2257 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2257 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 2257 0 0 1075 0 0 0 0 1735 0 324 ---------r--I---------------II---------------II---------------~I---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.10 Crit Volume: 752 0 0 868 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA X83 ~ ~f55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2x08 14:51:30 Page 11-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 Hacienda Drive/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X) 0.898 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1344 0 0 2529 0 1190 0 1101 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1344 0 0 2529 0 1190 0 1101 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1344 0 0 2529 0 1190 0 1101 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1386 0 0 2607 0 1227 0 1135 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1386 0 0 2607 0 1227 0 1135 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 1386 0 0 2607 0 1227 0 1135 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1386 0 0 2607 0 1227 0 1135 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------II---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 0 869 613 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA -~ss~4 °f ~5y 0 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:30 Page 12-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 28.8] Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------I~---------------~ Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1137 0 0 2359 3 0 0 24 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1137 0 0 2359 3 0 0 24 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1137 0 0 2359 3 0 0 24 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1172 0 0 2432 3 0 0 25 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVOlume: 0 1172 0 0 2432 3 0 0 25 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1218 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx x~txxx,.xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 176 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 176 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.14 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~I---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.5 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 28 8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * * * * * * * D * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ~~ SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 28.8 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * D * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA .~_.~ ~ ~. off- ~ /~J Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:30 Page 14-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study. Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM ---------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 57.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[2094.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --~~---------------I~---------- -----I~--------------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 41 1104 0 0 2378 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 41 1104 0 0 2378 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 41 1104 0 0 2378 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97.0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 42 1138 0 0 2452 5 34 0 68 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 42 1138 0 0 2452 5 34 0 68 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------~~---------------~I---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 2457 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 3108 3677 1228 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 193 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 9 5 173 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 193 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 8 4 173 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.22 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 4.44 0.00 0.39 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 28.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move : D * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 21 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 13.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 2094 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * F, * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 2094 2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~1~ ~ °~" `'~ 5 ~ MITIGB - Short Term CumulatThu May 1, 2008 17:42:10 Page 1-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) r*+**+*~******+*+**,++*+**+**+**,r*****+*******,r*********+*******~+*+*,r**+*++*+**+ Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive Cycle (sec) 85 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.798 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 71 Level Of Service: C +*****~**+,r++**+*~**+,r**+~+*******~*~***+*++.+*,r*****+*..+*+**+*,~*+*+*~+****+*~*+* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R ------------I------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Volume Module: Base Vol: 41 1104 0 0 2378 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 41 1104 0 0 2378 5 33 0 66 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 42 1138 0 0 2452 5 34 0 68 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 42 1138 0 0 2452 5 34 0 68 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 42 1138 0 0 2452 5 34 0 68 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 42 1138 0 0 2452 5 34 0 68 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.99 0.01 0.33 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 0 0 3433 7 573 0 1147 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 42 1228 102 0 Crit Moves: - +*****+****+*+*++**,r*~*+*********+****+**+**w**«*+*+**+*,r******************+**~* Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~lS~ ~ °~55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:51:30 Page 15-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions AM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Dougherty Road/Monterey Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 30.7] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~I---- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign -I Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 2 0 0 0 0' 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------~---------------I~---------------~I---------------II---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1145 0 0 2442 2 0 0 24 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1145 0 0 2442 2 0 0 24 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1145 0 0 2442 2 0 0 24 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1180 0 0 2518 2 0 0 25 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 1180 0 0 2518 2 0 0 25 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1260 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 164 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 164 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.15 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.5 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 30.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * D * * * Movement: LT -.LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx x~x ~~ xxxxx xxxx ~~ Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS : * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 30.7 xxxxxx ApproachLO5: * * D * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:54 Page 1-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM Scenario Report Scenario: Short Term Cumulative + Prj. Conditions PM Command: Short Term Cumulative + Prj. Conditions PM Volume: Baseline + Prj. PM Geometry: 2015 lanes wp Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution Paths: Default Path Routes: Default Route Configuration: Future PHF 0.97 Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~Sq af- X55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:54 Page 2-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 Dougherty Road/Amador Valley Boulevard Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.006 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F ****~**w**++*+*+***+***++***+*******+*******+*****,~+************~***++*+++****** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --------- ------------- ------------- --p---------- --------------~ Control: Protected Protected S lit Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 472 1392 0 0 1205 519 345 0 401 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 472 1392 0 0 1205 519 345 0 401 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 472 1392 0 0 1205 519 345 0 401 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 487 1435 0 0 1242 535 356 0 413 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 487 1435 0 0 1242 535 356 0 413 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 413 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 487 1435 0 0 1242 535 356 0 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1'.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 487 1435 0 0 1242 535 356 0 0 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.60 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 0 0 2404 1036 1720 0 1720 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.28 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 487 889 356 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **'`" ***+*,r*+***+*,~**************~***+**~+***~*****+,+*,r++*+**+****~***~***+****+**+*+ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:54 Page 3-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Dougherty Road/Scarlett Drive ************************************************w******************************* Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.441 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------~I---------------~~---------------I~---------------I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 64 1903 22 17 1580 22 12 1 44 27 1 20 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 64 1903 22 17 1580 22 12 1 44 27 1 20 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 64 1903 22 17 1580 22 12 1 44 27 1 20 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 66 1962 23 18 1629 23 12 1 45 28 1 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 66 1962 23 18 1629 23 12 1 45 28 1 21 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 66 1962 23 18 1629 23 12 1 45 28 1 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 66 1962 23 18 1629 23 12 1 45 28 1 21 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.97 0.03 2.00 2.96 0.04 0.21 0.02 0.77 1.00 0.05 0.95 Final Sat.: 1720 5101 59 3127 5089 71 362 30 1328 1720 82 1638 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 Crit Volume: 662 9 59 28 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~i ~ ~s5 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:54 Page 4-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Dougherty Road/Sierra Lane ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.500 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycler 46 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------~---------------I~- Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 ------------~---------------II---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ volume Module: Base Vol: 70 1859 70 21 1562 67 101 6 106 20 6 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 70 1859 70 21 1562 67 101 6 106 20 6 30 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 70 1859 70 21 1562 67 101 6 106 20 6 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97. 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 72 1916 72 22 1610 69 104 6 109 21 6 31 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 72 1916 72 22 1610 69 104 6 109 21 6 31 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 72 1916 72 22 1610 69 104 6 37 21 6 31 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 72 1916 72 22 1610 69 104 6 37 21 6 31 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 2.88 0.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.17 0.83 Final Sat.: 1650 4770 180 1650 4746 204 1650 1650 1650 1650 275 1375 ------------~---------------II---------------I~---------------~I---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.40 0.40 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 Crit Volume: 663 22 104 37 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA -~~a ~ X55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 5-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.873 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R --~~---------------~~---------------I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 3 0 3 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 633 1670 457 281 1338 137 226 1158 535 650 1735 406 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 633 1670 457 281 1338 137 226 1158 535 650 1735 406 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 633 1670 457 281 1338 137 226 1158 535 650 1735 406 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 653 1722 471 290 1379 141 233 1194 552 670 1789 419 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 653 1722 471 290 1379 141 233 1194 552 670 1789 419 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 257 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 159 RTOR Vol: 653 1722 214 290 1379 141 233 1194 301 670 1789 259 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 653 1722 214 290 1379 141 233 1194 301 670 1789 259 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.03 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.87 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.63 0.37 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 4307 5099 3000 3000 5987 613 3000 4950 3000 4307 4950 1650 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~- ~~- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.34 0.07 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.24 0.10 0.16 0.36 0.16 Crit Volume: 574 145 116 596 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~, ~a: ~~13 ~- ~I 55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 6-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Dougherty Road/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.683 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 72 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound .East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -I~---------------II---------------I ------------~---------------II-------------- Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 2149 0 0 1608 0 0 0 0 410 0 611 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 2149 0 0 1608 0 0 0 0 410 0 611 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 2149 0 0 1608 0 0 0 0 410 0 611 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2215 0 0 1658 0 0 0 0 423 0 630 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2215 0 0 1658 0 0 0 0 423 0 630 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2215 0 0 1658 0 0 0 0 423 0 630 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 0 2215 0 0 1658 0 0 0 0 423 0 630 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 3440 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.20 Crit Volume: 0 829 0 315 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~~-( ~{- ~s5 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 7-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hopyard Road/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.835 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 138 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I---------------~~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: WideBypass Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 2372 0 0 1567 0 882 0 1095 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .Initial Bse: 0 2372 0 0 1567 0 882 0 1095 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 2372 0 0 1567 0 882 0 1095 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2445 0 0 1615 0 909 0 1129 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2445 0 0 1615 0 909 0 1129 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2445 0 0 1615 0 909 0 1129 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 2445 0 0 1615 0 909 0 1129 0 0 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 815 0 564 0 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~; ~q5 ~f- X155 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 8-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Dublin Boulevard/Scarlett Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.597 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 121 0 45 0 0 0 16 1720 60 70 2577 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 121 0 45 0 0 0 16 1720 60 70 2577 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 121 0 45 0 0 0 16 1720 60 70 2577 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 125 0 46 0 0 0 16 1773 62 72 2657 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 125 0 46 0 0 0 16 1773 62 72 2657 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 125 0 0 0 0 0 16 1773 0 72 2657 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 125 0 0 0 0 0 16 1773 0 72 2657 0 ------------I---------------I~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 0 1720 0 0 0 1720 5160 1720 1720 5160 0 ---------------------------~~---------------~I---------------I~---------------~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.34 0.00 0.04 0.51 0.00 Crit Volume: 125 0 16 886 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 9-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM --------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.683 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 72 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 3 0 2 0 2 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 2 2 0 2 1 .0 ------------~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 531 697 597 276 448 251 250 1288 491 298 857 27 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 531 697 597 276 448 251 250 1288 491 298 857 27 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 531 697 597 276 448 251 250 1288 491 298 857 27 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 547 719 615 285 462 259 258 1328 506 307 884 28 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 547 719 615 285 462 259 258 1328 506 307 884 28 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 169 0 0 142 0 0 210 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 547 719 446 285 462 117 258 1328 296 307 884 28 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 547 719 446 285 462 117 258 1328 296 307 884 28 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 1650 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.91 0.09 Final Sat.: 4307 3300 3000 3000 4950 1650 3000 4950 3000 3000 4799 151 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.22 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.09 0.27 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.18 Crit Volume: 359 142 443 154 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Wit: -~q~ ~ q55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 10-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM ------------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Hacienda Drive/Westbound I-580 off-ramp ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.823 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): ~~ Optimal Cycle: 129 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ------------~---------------~~---------------II---------------~~---------------~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1968 0 0 1417 0 0 0 0 1303 0 489 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1968 0 0 1417 0 0 0 0 1303 0 489 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1968 0 0 1417 0 0 0 0 1303 0 489 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97. 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2029 0 0 1461 0 0 0 0 1343 0 504 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 2029 0 0 1461 0 0 0 0 1343 0 504 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2029 0 0 1461 0 0 0 0 1343 0 504 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVOlume: 0 2029 0 0 1461 0 0 0 0 1343 0 504 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 5160 0 0 5160 0 0 0 0 3127 0 3127 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.16 Crit Volume: 676 0 0 672 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 11-1 Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term - Cumulative + Project Conditions PM ---------- Level ------------------------ Of Service Computation Report ------ ------------ CCTALOS Method (Future Volume Alternative) **************************** ********************************** ****************** Intersection #10 Hacienda Dr ive/Eastbound I-580 off-ramp **************************** ********************************** ****************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0 710 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+ R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh ): . xxxxxx Optimal Cycle: 79 Level Of Service: C **************************** **************************************** ************ r Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Protected ------~~---p----------- Protected S lit Phase ~~---- Sp --------- lit Phase ~!~ Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 ------------~---- 0 3 0 0 ----------- 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ~I-------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: -------~~---------------~ ~---- -----------~ ~.. Base Vol: 0 2546 0 0 2180 0 610 0 591 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1...00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 Initial Bse: 0 2546 0 0 2180 0 610 0 591 0 . . 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 2546 0 0 2180 0 610 0 591 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 1.00 1 00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 . 0.97 0 97 #~ PHF Volume: 0 2625 0 0 2247 0 629 0 609 0 . 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ Reduced Vol: 0 2625 0 0 2247 0 629 0 609 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 0 2625 0 0 2247 0 629 0 609 0 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1.00 1 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1 00 1 00 FinalVolume: 0 2625 0 0 2247 0 629 0 609 0 . . 0 ` 0 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1 00 w Lanes: 0.00 3.00 ,0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 . 0.00 0 00 Final Sat.: 0 ------------~----- 5160 0 ----------~ 0 5160 0 3127 0 3127 ~---------- 0 . 0 0 '" Capacity Analysis Module: -----~I--------------- I I Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0 00 1~ Crit Volume: 875 0 t.3:~.4 . p Crit Moves: **** **** ,~*** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA :; ~` 1q~ of q55 Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 12-1 ----------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM --------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Dougherty Road/Ventura Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 16.9] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1864 0 0 1599 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1864 0 0 1599 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1864 0 0 1599 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 1922 0 0 1648 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 1922 0 0 1648 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 ------------~---------------~~---------------I~---------------~~---------------~ Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 828 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 319 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 319 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2 xxxX XxxX xxxxX Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 16.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * * * * * * C * * * LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ~~ ~~ xxxx ~~ SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx ~~ xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared"'LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~~ ~ ~5~ Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 14-1 --------------------------- -------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. Mariposa Drive Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[725.2] Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign ` Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~" Volume Module: Base Vol: 108 1844 0 0 1600 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 . Initial Bse: 108 1844 0 0 1600 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 k PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 108 1844 0 0 1600 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~, PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 111 1901 0 0 1649 14 21 0 39 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 111 1901 0 0 1649 14 21 0 39 0 0 0 ~ Critical Gap Module: ~" Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 6.5 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------~--------------- - ~~--- -----------I~---------------~~---------------~ Capacity Module: gin- Cnflict Vol: 1664 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2830 3780 832 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 392 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 14 4 317 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 392 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 11 3 317 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.28 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1.83 0.00 0.12 xxxx xxxx xxxx '~' Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 17.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx ~_ xxx LOS by Move: C * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 31 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 6 9 x~~ xxxxx ~~ xxxxx '~, Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 725 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * F * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 725 2 xxxxxx ~ ApproachLOS: * * F * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. *****1'1k 1F*~k ~k**Yr'k**7t yr**ir*it it**********************it ~t**1t 1r**Yt*********~t ~t************* ~ Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~r, II1R Bol~-~55 MITIGS - Short Term CumulatThu May 1, 2008 17:43:24 Page 1-1 --------------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM ---------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report CCTALOS Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #13 Dougherty Road/S. .Mariposa Drive +**++,t+**t*******,r+**+*,t,t**,r*,ta,t+*+**+*,t**,tt~+*,t*******+****+,r***~t+t*,r****~**** Cycle (sec): 85 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.587 Loss Time (sec): 6 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): ~~ Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T R --~~---------------~~---p-----------~~---------------~ Control: Protected Protected S lit Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 108 1844 0 0 1600 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 108 1844 0 0 1600 14 20 0 38 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 111 1901 0 0 1649 14 21 0 39 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 111 1901 0 0 1649 14 21 0 39 0 0 0 RTOR Reduct: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RTOR Vol: 111 1901 0 0 1649 14 21 0 39 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 111 1901 0 0 1649 14 21 0 39 0 0 0 ------------~---------------II---------------~~---------------~~---------------~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 1720 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.98 0.02 0.34 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1720 3440 0 0 3410 30 593 0 1127 0 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Volume: 951 0 60 0 Crit Moves: *****,t*,+***+**+*«+***++***+*+***~**+*++*+***,r****+**~***+*+********+***+*+*,r+**,r Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA Short Term Cumulative + PrjThu Apr 10, 2008 14:38:55 Page 15-1 ----------------------------------------------------- Arroyo Vista Housing Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Short Term Cumulative + Project Conditions PM ----------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 Dougherty Road/Monterey Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 17.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I------------- I --II------------- --II---------------II------P---g---- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Sto Si n Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II--------------- Volume Module: II---------------II---------------I Base Vol: 0 1952 0 0 1631 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1952 0 0 1631 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1952 0 0 1631 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 PHF Volume: 0 2012 0 0 1681 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 2012 0 0 1681 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 ------------I---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Fo1lowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------I---------------II--------------- II---------------II---------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 844 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 311 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 311 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 17 2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by MOVe: * * * * * * * * C * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ~~ xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx x~x xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 17 2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TJKM, PLEASANTON, CA ~dR ~n: