The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAttachmt 2 DrftResoAppv Amdmts RESOLUTION NO. 05 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN FOR A PORTION (APN 986-0004-005-01) OF THE PROJECT KNOWN AS DUBLIN RANCH WEST P A 02-028 WHEREAS, the Applicant, James Tong representing Chang Su-O (aka Jennifer) Lin, et. aI., submitted applications (P A 02-028) to the City regarding a 184-acre parcel ("Lin Family Property") located in the unincorporated area of Alameda County (APN 986-0004-005-01); and WHEREAS, a 189-acre project area known as Dublin Ranch West (formerly known as Wallis Ranch) is comprised of the 184-acre Lin Family Property and two smaller, individually owned parcels totaling approximately five (5) acres; and WHEREAS, Dublin Ranch West generally is located south of the County boundary, north ofthe existing City limits, east ofthe property owned by United States Government known as Parks Reserve Training Facility (PRTF), and generally west of Tassajara Road; and WHEREAS, all 189 acres of Dublin Ranch West are within the City's Sphere ofInfluence (SOl), the Eastern Extended Planning Area of the General Plan, and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area; and WHEREAS, the applications include: a) Amendments to both the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan for the Lin Family Property only; b) prezoning of the entire Dublin Ranch West project area to Planned Development (PD) and a Stage 1 Development Plan; c) a pre-annexation agreement; and d) a request to initiate annexation of the entire 189-acre Dublin Ranch West project area to the City of Dublin and to the Dublin San Ramon Services District. The applications collectively define this "Project"; and WHEREAS, the Project site currently is undeveloped and used for farming, grazing, storage, and other rural uses; and WHEREAS, the Tassajara Creek corridor is a dominant topographic feature of the Project site; and WHEREAS, the Dublin Unified School District has abandoned plans for locating an elementary school on a site designated within Dublin Ranch West; and WHEREAS, the realignment and location of Tassajara Road right-of-way and its intersection with the extension of Fallon Road affect the configuration of designated land use areas as shown on current land use plans for the Project site; and WHEREAS, the Project would amend the General Plan land use map and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use map for the Lin Family Property only, as shown on Exhibit A, including: ATTACHMENT d- · Removal of Tassajara Village Center; · Increase in Open Space along Tassajara Creek; · Removal all of the Neighborhood Commercial land use designations; · Omission of the Neighborhood Square from the location shown in Dublin Ranch West · Elimination of the Elementary School site; · Relocation and redesignation of Neighborhood Park space; · Inclusion of some Public/Semi-Public land use; · Minor modifications to the proposed road system; and WHEREAS, the Project would amend corresponding text, tables, and figures related to amendments to land use designations of the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, including but not limited to areawide land use diagrams, land use summary tables, figures regarding the location of schools and parks, and environmental resource exhibits related to open space and stream corridors shown in Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, on May 10, 1993, the City Council certified a program Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the Eastern Dublin GP AlSP Project and an addendum thereto, dated May 4, 1993 (SCH 91103064). On August 22, 1994, the City Council approved another addendum to update plans to provide sewer service. The May 10, 1993 program EIR, the May 4, 1993 addendum and the August 22, 1994 addendum are collectively referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR; and WHEREAS, upon approval of the Eastern Dublin GP AlSP Project, the City Council adopted mitigation findings, a statement of overriding considerations, and a mitigation monitoring program as set forth in Resolution 53-93, included in the Eastern Dublin EIR referenced above. All mitigation measures adopted for the GP AlSP Project continue to apply to implementing projects such as the current PD Prezone; and all applicable City development ordinances and standards apply to the Project except as otherwise approved through the Project prezoning and related Stage 1 Development Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Supplemental EIR entitled "Dublin Ranch West Project" (SCH #2004112094) was prepared and circulated; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the staff report and SEIR at a duly noticed public hearing held on February 22,2005 at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, on February 22,2005, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 05-_ recommending that the City Council certify the Supplemental EIR. The resolution is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, a staff report, dated February 22,2005 and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project, including the proposed amendments to the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the following Amendments to the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan based on findings that the amendments are in the public interest and that the General Plan as so amended will remain internally consistent. A. Amend the Land Use Map for both the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan as shown on Exhibit A. B. Amend the corresponding text, tables, and figures related to above amendments to the Land Use Map of the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, including but not limited to areawide land use diagrams, land use summary tables, figures regarding the location of schools and parks, and environmental resource exhibits related to open space and stream corridors, as set forth in Exhibit B. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February 2005 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Community Development Director 3 Exhibit A - Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area, General Plan/Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit [mike: 1 presume that Exhibit A is a map showing the revised land use designations for the Wallis Ranch annexation area] 4 '?-\ \ Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area General Pian/SpeCific Plan Amendment Exhibit January, 2005 G034-40 I[Y!JJ Proposed General Plan / East Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Land Use Plan Existing General Plan / East Dublin Specific Plan Land Use Plan EXHIBIT It RRA MOLLER //~'-'-._" /^" ~, , '", 200' M SHEA HOMES/ MSSH DUBLIN '"''"''"''' u~ NORTH 600' 300' 0' NP 4~Z.± <3r055 AMERICA UNITED STAn:s 0 r/sr Dublin ,373 No EXisting Generai Piall / é;:¡st Specific Flail wnd Use Pian P/5P £;32 West parcel ~ ,01 ,023 LEGEND Open Space Medium High Density Residen Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Rural Residential/Agriculture Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Square Elementary School Public/Semi- Public Note: The GP/SP Amendment only affects the Dubl,n Ranch other changes are proposed to other propertIes. / Plan I East Amendment OS MH M L RRA NP NC NS ES P/SP Land Use Summary T ,able froposcd GcncrGlI Dublin SpeCIfic Plan Land Use Pian Gross MI,jpolrt Acr!':5 Den51~ p" 5, 5pKe 5c~o;)1 o 20.0 G4.1 4,8 11.8 2.8 70.1 97 08 84.1 R.ßnch Wes Kc""Jt:~t31 LJnd U~C ¡^", '", ~, RRA MOLLER /~-'" M SHEA HOMES/ MSSH DUBLIN DEVELOPMENT LLC gp_spoRev8.dwq lis\Annex\ STATES OF AMERICA P/SP wol P:\ 16034-40\plocnic9\7CJCJ UNITED mACKAY & somps CIVil ENGINEERING_LAND PLANNING.LAND SURVEYING Pleasanlon, CA (925) - 225-0690 2CJCJS I ptol 03922 21 rev. \/2\ Dublin General Plan Amendment Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area Project Application P A 02-028 Page 8, Eastern Extended Planning Area (East of Camp Parks-See Figure 1-1a)* (MIKE- I know you said no courtesy changes, the following text section is missing and it applies to the Dublin Ranch West project in terms of identifying and describing the residential land use categories.) Residential categories Residential: Single-family, Residential: Medium Density, Residential: Medium High Density, and Residential: High, and Combination classification: Medium-High Density Residential and Retail/Office are missing. These categories should be copied over from the Primary Planning Area (West of Camp Parks- See Figure l-la) with the exception of Residential: High which is not a category in that section. For Residential: High, insert the following: Residential: High Density (25.1 units and above per gross residential acre). Residential units in this density range will be all attached. Housing types include condominiums, townhouses, apartments, and flats, and can be either for-sale or rental. These projects typically incorporate tuck-under or under-structure parking and may have three or more living levels. Assumed household size is two persons per unit. Figure 1-1a Amend City boundary and revise land use plan per Stage I PD proposal. Figure 1-2 Correct City boundary; and delete Tassajara Creek Regional Park, as is in error. Figure 1-4 Amend City limits Chapter 2 EASTERN DUBLIN EXTENDED PLANNING AREA First paragraph: ... The Eastern Extended Planning Area is projected to build out over the next 30-40 years, adding roughly 13,930 new housing units to the City. Buildout is projected to increase the City's population by approximately}2-;~5{~f)32,9Q~ people and add }R,IOO -L¡~,f)lZnew jobs. P:\] 6014-40\office\Suhm iltals\FDSP-GP .'\rncndmcnt\{ìP A- Wallis.dm: EXHIBIT () Table 2-1 : TABLE 2.1*,:', LAND USE SUMMARY: EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AylENDMENT AREA Classification Acres Intensity**" Units Factor Yield RESIDENTIAL Du's/acre Du's Persons/du Population High Density 69.9 35 2,447 2.0 4,894 Medium-High Density ~149.3' 20 ¥8Q2.986 2.0 ~5,972 Medium-Density ~498S 10 ~4.985 2.0 -W,-l-{tG9. 9 7 0 Single Family -l,~1,001.4'" 4 ~4,005 3.2 ~12.816 Rural Residential 842.5 .01 8 3.2 25 TOTAL ~25,616 ~14,431 ~33,677 Floor Area Square Feet Square Feet COMMERCIAL Acres Ratio (millions) / Employee Jobs (Gross) General Commercial 316.84 .35/.25 3.889 510 7,625 Neighborhood Commercial D9.+{)68.9" .35/.30 .9S().968 490 ~1,977 I Campus Office 189.36 .75/.35 3.052 260 11,739 Industrial Park 125.80 .25 1.370 590 2,322 TOTAL: '7M.-+() 7 00.9 9.l-9-l-9.279 ~23.663 I PARKS AND PUBLIC RECREATION City Park 56.3 1 parks Community Park 140.6 2 parks Neighborhood Park ~59,2' -W9 parks I Neighborhood Square -t-J.-J 1 0.5" +6 parks I TOTAL: ~266.6" W18 parks I 2EN SPACE ~454.4 I PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC Public/Semi-Public -W-I-.{) 1 02.9 .25 -l--.-t)-W 1. 12 0 590 -1,S(i41,899 I ,- Schools Elementary School ---'74.-1-64.4' '1--6 I schools ..'=' Junior High School 25.2 1 school High School 0 o school School Subtotal 99.J89.6 8 schools I TOTAL: ~192.5 I TRANSIT CENTER (Total) 90.7 - Campus Office (including 38.3 ancillary retail) - High-Density Residential 31.5 - Park 12.2 - Public/Semi-Public (Transit- 8.7 Related) GRAND TOTAL 4,266.7 Uuhli!] [{~l11CII Wc',[ i'C\ i:oi\)Jì", lebnl~II'\ 200), pCI ( PLm Spcci Ill' l'bl\m,:ndn;clIll'\02-02R, * Table 2, I appears as Table "2A" in the Eastern Dublin GP A. It was relabeled herein for formatting purposes. "Numbers represent a mid-range considered reasonable given the permitted density range, '"'Partial school sites represent sites that lie partially outside the Specific Plan area, but within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area, P:\ 16034-40\oftìce',Suhmittals\EDSP-G P Amendment\GPA.- \Vallis.doc Section 4.4 Delete last two sentences of first paragraph. 1')·')1) (MIKE- Again, I know "no courtesy changes", however, the following Chapter 5 text classifications are inaccurate based on other City standard and policy documents. These dimensions specifically affect the Dublin Ranch West project, but the entire City development area would be affected by this. Perhaps Melissa should review the following, plus the other standards in the General Plan document for consistency and accuracy,) Section 5.1.1 RESIDENTIAL STREETS Right-of-way ?-2-~ 46 ' Cul-de-sacs Curb to curb- c14'-36 , Right-of-way- j(}'-46' 111 inimLlIl1 The length of cul-de-sacs shall not exceed ()()(}-LJlliQ,feeL Chapter 7 Environmental Resources Management, Conservation Element Page 58, Eastern Extended Planning Area Revise text to state that the majority of the lands are not in Williamson Act contracts. \1ik-º_-=-iSJ h i s_u k t <.,LçI 0, 0 Ul c Ie tc:)~!'.) Appendix A Add this project to list of Amendments and Approvals: Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area, Resolution No., Date Adopted, and GP updated. P:\ 16034-40\officc\Submitt3Is\EDSP-GP Amendment\GP A- Wa! lis.doc h3v.\\~ Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Dublin Ranch Annexation Area Project Application P A 02-028 The following are proposed amendments to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan as part ofP A 02-028: CHAPTER 2: PLANNING AREA DESCRIPTION 2.3 Ownership Patterns Ownership patterns in the planning area are shown in Figure 2.4, There are 4:i:-44 recorded parcels in the planning area, which are owned by :i:-527 different landowners. Landowners' names and size of holdings are listed in Figure 2.4. Ownership holdings range in size from L'1_~ acres to 1,251 acres. This nuure illustrates 0111\/ thS:"QIiuil1:lLlliIL(~l~,priorJiJ~eir h~'í 11g",:,'1bl,li v i~lçd. Figure 2.4 Revise map to update ownership list and add missing property owners (Bragg and S perfs lage ). CHAPTER 3: SUMMARY 3.3.3 Land Use Categories Residential First paragraph: ...a total of ßB-f7L2,42.0. housing units... Commercial First paragraph: ... accommodate approximately 10-:-g"million square feet of new commercial space, 3.4.1 Streets and Highways Second paragraph: -,-,----,-Tassajara Drivo and Fallon Road will be through routes from I 580 to Contra Costa County, Fallon Road will merge with Tassaiara Road and become a single through route into Contra Costa County. 3.6 Community Design Add to end of fifth paragraph: .\l1bc)ugh llll' F&st ili i"-í:~L1LS~;_(~Qr~~L tIle i;J~~i1J DI¿l Y jJI,lgt;L'l'll[t:r, c\i "II rig lCWC).';;l:lDhi\.,,¡I_,:.lU~Ll~1JV¡LUr)Uì ent;¡! \. Il_' ìi'l, Jr: \v/ i ¡ I~¡g~: ~._x :ì>; Ie. P:\] 6034-40\onìce\Submittals\EDSP-GP AmcmJment\EDSPA 1-13-0S.doc 3.7. t ligi:[Ntn-e new schools (five Ð elementary_; 2 intermediate; I senior high) are provided by the Specific Plan. Approximately 1300 acres Mest of the planning area eastern Dublin currently lies within the Livermore Vallev Joint outside the Dublin Unified School District but is expected to be detached from that district and attached to the Dublin Unified School District prior to any development taking place within the area. Questions regarding which jurisdiction sho'cdd serve the planning area should serve the planning area should be resolved through cooperative efforts of the Dublin Unified and Livermore Joint Unified school cldricts, CHAPTER 4: LAND USE 4. t Purpose Second paragraph: ... buildout of the planning area would generate approximately 2--7;Ú,g-~ 2L52{J,new residents, ] 2,34-~,n,]6 7 new dwelling units, and -2Äi-,4t"?429Jd.0jobs. P:\] 6014-40\ilfticc\Suhmittals\EDSP-CìP Amendment\FDSPA 1-1 ]-05.doc Table 4.1 Adjust table to reflect the Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area proposal. TABLE 4.1 EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE SUMMARY Land Use Description LAND AREA DENSITY YIELD COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL General Commercial 325,74 acrcs ,25-.35 FAR 3,783 MSF Neighborhood Commercial 7~2,8* acres ,30-.35 FAR 1.W-t--020 MSF Campus Ot1ìce 192.66 acres ,35-,75 FAR 3.730 MSF Industrial Park 72AO acres .25 FAR ,788 MSF Subtotal 664.43.6 &9-149.32] MSF RESIDENTIAL High Density 68.2 acres 35 du/ac 2,387 du Medium High Density +±h4148.7 acres* 20 du/ac ~2,974 du Medium Density ~464.3 acres* 10 du/ac 4,--H&-4,643 du Single Family 62~2.1 acres* 4 duJac ~2,488 du Rural Residential/Agric, 410,8 acres .0 I dulac 4 du Subtotal ~1 714.1 ~12.496du PUBLIc/SEMI-PUBLIC Public/Semi-Public ~98.2 acres* ,24 FAR +.M-9-1 ,027 MSF SCHOOLS Elementary School 6-9-k59,9 acres* 65.5 schools Junior High School 35,9 acres 1.8 schools Subtotal -WS-Æ95.8 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE City Park 56.3 acres I park Community Park 126.7 aeres 2 parks Neighborhood Park 4á42,2 acres 1-6 Darks Neighborhood Square -±-;h; 10,5 acres 1-6 parks Subtotal 24M235.7 acres -1-'7-15 parks Open Space ~446,7 acres TOT AL LAND AREA 3,254.1 acres J)lLl"!ij 11. g;)}~!_~}ì ,\ \~c'~~LUL\j>_¡í__~LL'::. I ç b.L~!.~1L'Y ~~O~L~_, [<'.1' çJ~n~; l~-,~ì l_I_) L~_]_!J _S pi.,'\:iJls I' ¡ ~r)_ \ n '\:L_ll i -;1\ i ì1 I ¡.\ (ì~:-~ P:\] 60J4-40\{)ITicc\Submittals\EDSP-G P Amendmenl\EDSPA] ¥ I 3-05 ,doc 4.4.1 LOCATION AND DIVERSITY Fžrst paragraph - The Eastern Dublin Specitìc Plan designates acres with a wide range of residentiaL.... Table 4.2- Modify fìgures in this table to reflect the Dublin Ranch West Annexation Area proposal. TABLE 4.2 EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY Land Use Designation Development Sq Ft/Emplovees Persons/d.u. Population Commercžal +m+1,020 General Commercial 3,365 MSF 510 6,598 Neighborhood Commercial 1.021 MSF 490 ~2,081 Campus Office 4.625 MSF 260 17,787 Industrial Park 0.719 MSF 590 1,218 Public/Semi Public 1.049 MSF 590 1,778 TOT AL: 10.77810,767 29,48429,4 MSF 61 Res ždentžal High Density 2,387 2.0 4,774 Medium High Densitv ~2,974 2.0 ¥+45,948 Medium Density 4,8l-J4,643 2.0 9-,-646 9,286 Single Family ~2,488 3.2 -1,9+47,961 Rural Residential! Agric. 4 3.2 13 TOTAL: 12,34312,496 27,b8127,9 82 TABLE 4.3 CITY OF DUBLIN PROJECTED JOBS/HOUSING BALANCE PLANNED Dwelling Jobs Employed Balance2 Ratio3 AREA Units Residents! Existing City of 7,100 12,210 12,000 -210 1.02A: 1.0 Dublin4 Eastern Dublin 12,31312,49 29,1g1~ ] 9,99620,2 -9A&&- 1.45:1.01 , - Specific Plan Area 6 9,461 44 9,217 .46: 1.0 Total 19,44319,59 41,6941 31,99632,2 -9--,698: 1.30: 1.0 6 1,671 44 9,427 I Projections assume a ratio of 1,62 employed residents per household based on ABAG;s Proiections '90, 2 The "balance" refers to the number of employed residents in relation to the number of jobs (i,e., a positive number means there re more employed residents than jobs), 3 Ratio of jobs to employed residents, 4 Taken from ABAG's Proiections '90, P:\J 6034-4O\otlice\Sublllitta!s\FDSP-C}P AmenJment\EDSP A 1-] 1-05.doo..: 4.9 PLANNING SUBAREAS 4.9.5 VILLAGE CENTERS LAND USE CONCEPT At the end of the first paragraph, add: "()ClilL~\!ld.lì Ü\ l' ~L~~,:,~..g~l~ c ,It Ib~ Jjl,?::-;U; 1 fLV i1,1; ig,--'~,( i-'ll: r.~~\i?llllg ll)[il) gJ;ll)llil",IL'llJd l 11\ il '\ 111L11¡': 111 (lLS:J)Il(jjti~)1l s Umillh~L\j;lh i Ill). of lLÜ~ . j)\;[11 c ()lJl'l' J~t .. ,.1 }ì_llçíjJX'<,JL1.t:, ".I,l.iSiÜ-'!)il vlU;lge(';lll cr<l:-;l)ri L':i}illl~L l'll vi? i()lle(Ll~lIJllil"Jt>J,=,: Table 4.8 Revise this table as shown, TABLE 4.8 T ASSAJARA VILLAGE CENTER SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL Designation Acres Density DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL Neighborhood Commercial g~(~7,S ,30 FAR ,++-2-, J 02 msf Medium High Density Residential 2+-,-+22.3 20 du/ac ,5 il2 446 du Medium Density Residential 'i2cØ29,(1 10 du/ac S20 296 du Single Family Residential 17,6 4 du/ac 70 du Residential Subtotal IOS.J 77.3 1,13'2-812 du Open Space P-!2,(J -- -- N-e-fg-I-tBe-F-hBBtJ--,P'HJok ~7~ -- -t---raffi NB~)-F1-l-ftB{J S q'tlftR- h\ -. 1'--1*1-'* Park/Open Space Subtotal 2-5-.-2- 2 . 0 -- 2 parks -!~-!effiè+lla-fY-,s; l~hHB-1 .1-t-;g - -t-+it.41eB-t -- cl-l-Þ. t 02 msf Total 1-+.2,.379.3 commercial -1---.;-1-32812 du 2 parks 1 elementary school P:\ 160J4-40\oftìce\Suomittals\EDSP-GP Amendment\EDSP ¡\ I-I 3-05 ,dnc Table 4.10 Revise table to reflect the elimination of Dublin Ranch West (Lin property only) from Tassajara Village and its uses included into Foothill Residential. TABLE 4.10 FOOTHILL RESIDENTIAL SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL Designation Acres Density DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL Medium I j i:2h Density Rcsidenli~¡\ /0, I 20 du/ac 402 d u Medium Density Residential ;G6:-+238, I 10 du/ ac 2,26 ~2,3g1 du Single Family Residential 505.8 4 du/ac 2,023 du Rural Residential 410.8 ,Oldu/ac 4 du Residential Subtotal 1,-142-;71, t 74.8 4,~{)4.8 I 0 du Open Space 3-3-1-43 60,2 -- -- Community Park 46.1 -- I park Neighborhood Park ~-;~-~2S .3 -- ~A parks Park/Open Space Subtotal 404.143 I .6 -- 4-5parks Elementary School 16.1 -- 2 schools Junior High School 21.4 -- I school High School 55.3 -- I school School Subtotal 92.8 -- 4 schools -- 4,~1-34.8 I 0 du Total h6~1(};l-1.699.2 4-5 parks 4 schools Figures 4.1 and 4.2 - Maps revised to reflect proposed Dublin Ranch West land uses and related features. CHAPTER 5: TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Program SA Residential Streets LOCAL RESIDENTIAL Add: Right-of-way: 46' or 56' with separated sidewalks (replacing 52') Cul-de-sacs Add: Right-of-way: 46' with monolithic sidewalks Program 5C- Tassajara Creek Trail Revise last sentence as: There should be a butfer with an approximate minimum width of 100 feet between the lFilJ¡nls)Jìi2[þ~[I ~.. and nearby development. P:\I fi034-40\officc\Suomitlals\[])SP-(ìP Amendment\EDSPA I-I J-05.dnc 5.5.2 Bicycle Parking Requirements Action Program: Bicycle Circulation Bike Path: CntlSlrH€tahikep¡¡¡h pitH!' !,~ Bike Lanes: Add to end of sentence: PI\'\ l.' ¡ LLè\J21JrD\alJ~i 1:.. s"ll~'tY.I:gl,',\!IL" :,!)L'l'i Uli cÌ :,11;11'1':'(\ rnulli-usc tl'èlií \\ i[1i ------ ~ ----_.~._._----_._._----- CHAPTER 6: RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 6.2 OPEN SPACE 6.2.4 OWNERSHIP AND lVIAINTENANCE From the standpoint of resource protection, it is preferable that undeveloped Rural Residential lands be assembled into a contiguous whole that can the be managed an maintained by an agency with experience in open space management such as the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD). The land could be dedicated to an agency or remain under private ownership, and management responsibilities contracted to an outside agency ~2E dcccl~d in a conservation casement to ~1Il oruani/,¡Lit2ll-"Ülb C\pericllce mêllJilgill:2 open space for natural resource Qß2t¡,:ctic)1L Program 6B: The City should explore options for ownership and management of areas set aside as open space. l)ÇJ)t'lliÌillli-0J} t h~Jllm20SC()!' the ,open spa~'e, oPwnership of these areas by public agencies, such as the East Bay Regional Park District, is \lSlIiÙlLpreferred, In particular, the City should encourage East Bay Regional Park District to accept ownership of the Tassajara Creek open space lLaiLcorridor. The (t-ity should also work with the Park District to develop guidelines for management and uses in L(,-~credJJ'\)lJlÜ_open space areas, LC tJ1C2,mll]2(Jse _(21J h C-ºQ~11 spa cç is" n atl Ir aJJ~' s \ 1U 1'C_C PJ'DJcc tiQll, ag~ll c i ç.S_QI DJua ni!_,lLÍl2I1S_vÜLb ~)criencc in such preserves, woul d lJl' m:.ç i'crrclL Policy 6-11: All stream corridors, as shown in Figure 6.2, shall be managed to encourage revegetat!QJled with native plant species to enhance their natural appearance and improve habitat values. Active r¡{evegetation must be implemented by a professional revegetation/rcstQr~¡li on specialist. II ab i[ ,I (11),1 I]agÇI11CnJ sh(jld d bc~) VCL"--C~r!_ÞY~U:C5l\)I~lWJn cc ~2I.s~i~':,L P:\ 16034A(\offìcc\Suhmitt<ìls\EDSP-(ìP Amendmcnl\EDSP A 1-13-05.dpc 6.3.2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Previously developed and LrcV')_l¡~i>_cultivated ~llìilu~ìLgr:\''c<lands occupy the majority of the planning area. Because of their history of disturbance, these areas generally have few if any remaining native plant species associated with them, and have low habitat value. Annual grassland is by far the Jrt''c+-most dominant habitat type-])i+S-t'ÜtitH+t"2H. However, this habitat is generally degraded by overgrazing and now consists of primarily introduced annual and perennials, and few native species, This habitat, which has been displaced by JlrlQl agricultural activities and ~LllæJILdevelopment in the lower elevations and flat plain areas, is now found primarily on the sides and ridge tops of the areas rolling hills. Program 6N: The use of rodenticides iI-FHJ\'1t-Fbftttles-within the project area should be restricted to avoid impacts on wildlife, The City shall require any poisoning programs to be done in cooperation with and under supervision of the Alameda County Department of Agriculture. l1~LI2.ieídes sho1J..IclJ)~_Jt'.l:<JJ.)nlv :,cLcclLy-º.ly~\~ítJ}il1 lhcprojccl area, should \?~ (,;,UEC fu I ] vU[J12lit:_<Ì.ÌJLug,:l,mJa n (,;,t.:,_\y}llLlhenlJl£U1\ I Ii! CJlI r e '~ills I I'll qjQ1lS, an d II seq--ºlllLfo r ,S-' 0 n t rQl ()Ln()n~nati yc pcst pjallLsI2Ççiçs,. RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES No rare or endangered plant species have been identified in the planning area,:-a-ItftBug+t-one s-j3€-€-i-at--s-1:-atus-plant, Con:zdon 's larnl,II1LK'(~Il/rolll{(di(/ Jhl/T\'i ssp, CO/l'2:do/liiL found in the 12~lI}IliJJl£J!l:Ç(lit-Fe- Ìl>_º-QJh e C aÜl\2IllL,-tl'ja1i~çJ'11m SQL; i ct YiC' \j P S lJjJ ve n!iJ[£!lil? (1 {C' (/l1}j However, ~~ºr1gij"<')tlll.é!rp lanlbI~2"l__kllU\VI1JlU)L'CuL!lli!ILyvi de I V i\!lLjjn greatcrj1bllndance thalJ~é!?__pre\_JQ1i,s,Jy kI1O\\I1:_H-tLnumber of special::.status wildlife species (i,e., species that are LisJ¡;;,cL(\}:J21'í] LlL\ç"cL as _lb rqU~IJl:sLOII,-' n d a I 19\,'IC_LI,_QX,cl rc_illbt.:,l'\ v i,s,e 0 I' C º-lb'i,Ç r v a tiQ1lJ,'S) 11 C l:.ID h€-~tevè-dt{)-n~1€l'lHse-+t-H:tH(-tti-¡~~fngr(4F ¡ i :--t-Î-ng-ac,-Htfi2 ()f--elìtl-ang-e-H'Ü-due to declining populations-ºrtbr~c(ll~l<)_~lIJ'I'CJltP()lìUI;l\í<2ns) are known to occur in the planning area or the immediate vicinity, including the red-legged frog-.Û\.'Jcr,tiìv li"ted as thrcdtcncd), California tigçr~llªmal1clgifcdl:.Ia]I)fJi~'ilccJ aslhrc;)tl,'JlI:d}, western pond turtle, golden eagle, northern harrier, burrowing owl, gf€Ht-b¡uellLTÜt1~gH"Hteg'F1.-'t--;;-H+I{4-AHH:?¡~'-i--anbadh'è-f _ill1d others. Figures 62_(lI~i6.3 shows l1lanLQ[the location~ where such species haye been observed were s-i-ætl4H'ing-tJ1:e-þtHtB-g-ieal-H~n-H*-t+-()-1-"-illthe planning area. Most of the northern portion of the planning area also represents suitable foraging habitat for the federally endangered San JoaquinJ\4-t-kilJox. +o--datHtUOWever, no definitive confirmation of kit fox presence in the planning area has been foundckm,ilc C\lCIL"ivcStJryçys. Figure 6.1 - modify to show Project's change to parks and open space. Figures 6.2 and 6.3 - modify to show current environmental information on the Project site. Section 6.3.4 VISUAL RESOURCES T ASSAJARA CREEK AND ()-/-ilii2.1NTERMITTENT STREAMS In addition to the foothills, the key visual elements in the planning area are Tassajara Creek and the ot-ilerintermittent streams that flow through the area. P:\] 6034-40\office\Submiltals\FDSP-CìP Amelldrnent\EDSP:\ 1-1 J-05.th: CHAPTER 7: COMMUNITY DESIGN Figure 7.28 Tassajara Village Concept Plan- Revise as illustrated. 7.3 FOOTHILL RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS add" or as approved by the Community Development Director" at end of the sentence. BUILDING TYPES .bse-L1lCt)L!Eagcstepped foundations OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC F ACILlTIES · On second bullet, add "or as approved by the Community Development Director." at end of sentence. · Revise third bullet as follows: Avoid lining open space corridors with private yard fences, Use walls or fences less than 4 feet high, slopes, berms, Ii'JdllL9PCIlbic\y r(?JJ~jngand vegetation masses to separate public open space from private yards. Figure 7.33: Add "or as approved by the Community Development Director." at end of sentence. 7.5 CIRCULATION SYSTEM 7.5.2 Streets RESIDENTIAL COLLECTOR · 12' ~H)'Jrom curb line to right-of-way I ine includes 6' sidewalk and 6'::: IJtplanting. · lD-'-~ 15' Jandscape easement outside right-of-way RESIDENTIAL STREET · -1--0-'--2_'Jrom curb line to ROW line includes 5' monolithic sidewalk and 5' p-l-a-H-t-i-R-g !-Mi-¡T-wi-t-I't-€-aHHt7Y--+ rc e :; Figure 7.49A Insert new street section being used for the project and is the City standard- street with monolithic sidewalks. P:\ 16034-40\office\Submittals\[DSP-GP :\mendmcnt\EDSP A I-I }-05.dnc APPENDIX 3 The following tables were revised to remove the atTected lands ofLin (Dublin Ranch West) from the Tassajara Village Center Subarea, and include them into the Foothill Residential Subarea. Tassajara Village Center Neighborhood Commercial 'I.t> 7.:~ ,., 1-1--2_3 xS 1 () I, (J ~ () ,,) Medium High Density Residential ~:;--t-22.3 20 §4-':6446 Medium Density Residential 51"lr::: 9, (¡ 10 5-:6~~2 96 Single Family Residential 17,6 4 70 Subtotal t-OS.,~ 7 7 ..3 ! 0 ] , (J ~Ot-l-2,-J8S l--,--t-J;!-812 ()pe-n ~pa{'e P;l -N-e-i-g-4-ÞO-f]1i-H-Jfl-!-1i:tÆ ~~1 N-etgh-Bt-'tl'hood-?;t¡ Hit Fe- ;q,; S-u-b-ttttu-~ ~5.-1 bk."tH€-A-t-df-V-c:S-€-RfH'tj ¡l~ Total 1-42.-ð 77.3 I 0 ] .93 ()-l-J-Þ-,-J-SS -l-;--l-J;!- 8 1 2 Foothill Residential Mçd i II IlJ High Detl si t yR csi cl en t ia] 20. ¡ 20 402 Medium Density Residential 2J-(~; 12JS. î 10 J ;2 Ó ¡ "". j ~: ¡ Single Family Residential 505.8 4 ~*B2_Jl23 Rural Residential 410,8 .01 4 Subtotal h-l-....1-.-'71,1 74.8 4,31-1) 4810 Open Space 3-:1+435S.3 Community Park 46.1 Neighborhood Park }' '1 ì':; , ~::í-;-;::-~_,,) Subtotal ..wO.'i'42 9.7 Elementary School 16.1 Junior High School 21.4 High School 55,3 Total l-,f}-3-6-.-J I ,697 . 3 4,JW4,810 I GRAND TOTAL I ~~7-§,-t-9813,564, 743 !12,456Þf-1 II 3,382.5 P:\ 1 h034-40\oftìcc\'Submiltals\EDSP-GP Amcndmenl\FDS P A 1-13-05 ,d·,e APPENDIX 4 Modify the following table to reflect the proposed Dublin Ranch West changes in land use: Owner/Land Use Category Acres Density Sq.Ft. Units #1 CHANG SU-O-LIN General Commercial 49.1 ,25 534,699 Neighborhood Commercial 2,UX ,3 ,;'~};-5-902 b, j; () Campus Office 39,4 .35 600,692 High Density Residential 7.0 35 245 Medium High Density ¡l),93S,,~ 20 ;9-,-'? /04 - Residential Medium Density Residential ~Oì-:I,J ! l).2 A 10 204-W ¡ 224 Single Family Residential 2lì-:j'-:+-+.2 () 5- . 8 4.0 +,-+-&'? L 83 Rural Residential 170.5 .01 1 Community Park 101.5 Neighborhood Park 1 (,:-X ] 3 .8 Neighborhood Square +:j] ,5- Open Space ;g2-.-~2l)2,0 Elementary School ;.x-:+-J28,3 High School 20.6 Pub I iclS..:'1ìì i --- Pu b lie 19 .. - --- I TOTAL I.",'-:"--I-:-U ¡:-l-+-¡;;-~I . I (0 I .52] i,,'?0+4 . ()5 (0 Add the following properties to Appendix 4 Table: Owner/Land Use Category Acres Density Sq.Ft. Units #2() BRAGG Medium High Density Residential 1.0 20 20 Neighborhood Commercial .6 .30 FAR 7,841 , TOTAL 1.6 7,841 Owner/Land Use Category Acres Density Sq .Ft. Units #27 SPERFSLAGE Medium Density Residential 1.0 10 10 Open Space 2.2 TOTAL 3,2 10 I GRAND TOTAL 13,301.7 D -J-IH;9-74,90-3110,964,442 IJ2,-3&~12,593 II P:\16034-4O\oftice\SuÌ1mitlals\r:nsp-(¡p Arnendl1lent\FDSPA 1-! ~-05.d(,c Program SA Residential Streets LOCAL RESIDENTIAL Add: Right-of-way: 46' or 56' with separated sidewalks (replacing 52') Cul-de-sacs Add: Right-of-way: 46' with monolithic sidewalks Program 5C- Tassajara Creek Trail Revise last sentence as: There should be a buffer with an approximate minimum width of 100 feet between the lFH-ilL'ill-Q[bdnJs_and nearby development. 5.5.2 Bicycle Parking Requirements Action Program: Bicycle Circulation Bike Path: ('t1nS-l-Fltt¡-a--17¡~tmlhpa-Fd+-k+-l+Hht'---!-ay.;'a:i-a-Ht---('-tttk R cq u i re l h e t ra i I a ¡ () 11 g I;l'i~Ùillll('LCl.j<",t() lX~'l@¡ti-LIS~.-lEÜI shared hv pedeslrians and hicyç1isls, Bike Lanes: Add to end of sentence: (.JL12ßJ.~!detlQIL"-U':~~1-'2r:liL~,hared mulli-=-!-!~ lraiL~~n,b Ç;llY-'-U2pr(ì_\.:ill--'l)L~C\JL:l:U': e ,I S\lIlo'i. P:\ 16034-40\clffice\Suhmitt<1ls\EDSP-GP ,\mendmclll\FDSP A ¡-13-0S.dnc -o}" -"# :'¥' .,...... /.... ; ::'..... ..,~ ~'>,'~, ,: -~, ,~~.~>< ; j ; .... ~~..".: .../! '~".. "" "~~,', . ; ...._ ,J '. ,,' (..,,_.~ i, r'~"~~~: .:~:,,/,~, " l\ ' ~?, ,.,'~~': , \ ,_-" ," '.' r ,,~O' ",..,.*~ (::!., \:;,-' rf' ( r;-~~' ~..~:J'" <> ,~~>~(' / ) " " "ì ~ ,'/" , .., ' ,\/:~, \ -,:-/~~; ~' . ;<'~'~~'::~~~~.'>:. ...~ .o~ .~ ~ 2 ~' ,'( ,-tOe-'·. "" M." ' : : . 1'-/5· I """'~""" \ '" : ~ \.::.~-," -'''~·;~··-1·~-*'''''··--·tÍI,1 ': , ,', ~., ,;:/ '. ~ ---': ,,-/'-" ,'. . ", __"" - , , :", 6 "" ",'" '--.. c' · ! _y~.,} { 1 .J~~/ (,.>,) '.",/ / ,; ,~.~' :' t, i'_1~~-/1 .. 'Ö" , ___ '" ' :' /~. ....',' - ,I, -" ,.' . \ -."".-" ... --- . '. __ _~ . I '.- -... , , :,--'" " , ' /' 'A/; ,_""". ~" " . ,--: ,; ----..-:-.' ) --. '" ' "'" ... ", -; ;, I"~:':.' ~.: '''''''' ; .' ' .> " . 7 / ,-"'" ,: """ " , .' / ..," / j ~) .~.._" ç'../ .: /' I . ,'. " ,. .-" 7Q'" "8" ' "', ' ",,'" :' " ,'", ,/ ....~~,,' / '-\, .~, ,;.~ , :<,,~oc,/"·<,t,.' ',: ,.r-<;l/..·· ",I·-~:.;.·_.. , ," " ' . ' I, -., " , ---"- --.j " ~~ \ / /"" ,." ..I' . 'o,,·..···-·...._f I~_. ¡",v~"""",' ".'.: > ./ ... 'h/" _~........., J " /--.-. .._ '-""'/"":;"" ."".J '.., :'~,., -:;",,- ---...----~! '--;', 7~j , -- -', /'/ <I" ~ ., / -' '. ' -' r -- --I ' !. ",j' "j . :. I ({5://-"_., /"'~~':' :. ) \:: ,r -': /1' I/J\ j ·',---e~o-·-- '" ;, " " I ' / i ':"" ", i\":~'-:.'~· .>~:.'; (.,.;:,'::' · . ; " ; '1··... .- ' , ./ ~.;' ....".--.,:. ,..-' :'~. :.,,.,: , ;. " ,.,' , ," '--" "0",-, : "_., ) . ~~::' ......... 1; :' ,/6~'::\· ,\'-..-.. _"",: ... 1"-'·' ':~ .: ' ~ #~ '¡', I , , ' . '. ,. :: / . c: 13' : ' , " ,\, ,- _'. ,..,....,. /' 1 \. , . : ~--- :: :;.' \ -; i ... :: -"- _¡o' " /.. ,. ...I.,; ...... ,.... i ......,: I :l(C~ \;~'~\ _" _ 5\ .~." ~, :\C"" . i. ; ";~>~:"-_.,, ,/ J () ',) I ,\;' " "'/'·'..,,<00--,,----' "., i '''', '000' , '--., , ' : ,) , ):: ,..' \j ''¡.:; I~:\J;(' (~' \.-':;:;. .. , \ , '.'J r '/' § ',. ,," " 10., I '" " ' " '",--,. "Iit,'/ 0"\"""",, .lr j \, " ,.,/ \" :,./ __". "!.,~ \,,,'l, ,:'\,'i , :' / '0 " . 14 "",,- , ,.; '\ ,. ',,, " , \, , ~, " \ / ì ". ¡' LL.~_..~.~/· .- r..-..-..-..-- --.. ...... --5(,C-' -.".' r;-:", ", ,J ,.-.., " ) ; j-- __' I : ' " /',' '-'" I I 15 i '- 1"/" / ' , I: I ,''- ',,,--' I · ,", ,,/,:. . II .."L--, -- ';,:! l! I,J 20 /'/,:/'" I :^, I ,,__ "; > I' -' / I : ) / \, ,/ /. · " . J .- \ f 1 '. I .' '.. / I / I -0 _"'" f r" ,,-oc·-- I r' I "~. '" ~" ('lb: ,; :' , :", : "'--, " '. AI "-'./1.)"/.» ~'\':::' ~J/~'~f:) <:~.- __ , \ /: .. .- / i ' , .. : I:: · It --. . ; .,. I " ~(o,. ,I: Ii ,s()"", / '..,/ 1" /' /,' .:, "" · I I i 21 ..~, 22 I 23 · / · \ Ownership Patterns rev Figure 2.4 s -' - ~ ,,~ / '" ~, r' / /; , / '00- '. ~~'~ ," ~~ , 'J , ACREAGE' 48.78 39.8 8.81 3301.84 251.0 12.5 5.0 7.93 2.10 67.83 160.0 91.0 10.0 10.0 3.75 1.0 306.04 189.12 135.62 48.90 272 71.56 19.19 700.4 4.17 80.14 Su-O-Un Homes 14 Koller 15 Casterson 16 County 01 Alameda 17 United States 01 America 18 Dublin 19 Pao-Lin 20 Jordan Land Company TOTAL: 10 Zimmer 11 Raley 12 Gygi 13 East Bay Regional Park District Vargas Herrera Haight Mission Peak Redgewick Silvera Plato 21 TMI 22 Anderson 23 Righetti 24 Branaugh 25 CarrpbeU Legend Chang Moura OWNER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ,-V / .' " ./ '.-..- ; 500 ~ I~-' ,- / ," " / " " , /',- _../ -, '-. ~'.:/' 5r.~',."J ,',-........ ;, ,-- 7':-': " , ", ~ " .-.-' ," , , ' -, i \ "- ¡ , -- , / -' , 'J ...... ~O, '",_' , ,^ ,....) ,,--- ~... --.......... '>~ , - , , , , ,- '.., ................., ,," ~, .........""'<1;).. /~ '-~ /'-.. ,/ $ , ,i '", "\ -.. ',., ~ " , " /"---' , r' ". --: ,¡./-, "'~ ,.J <;,,0-' , , / " '- ,- " '" ... / ./ ~ ,. , ¡ / ," \_- ~no... \ "- " '- ',-..- .,~' ..-=:;;;";~" ...... " -- ,"' 't~,r:: " , /' -/ ;.......... /If'-C '- / ,/:' , '- ~" " , \....~. / ~"~ '" / ; , , ,- " ~oc- '~'- '" .' ,- '- :",~, \'-'" / " // ..... ;or; /!~. ; /-..... .-- ,.., '0:;____... " -' , " -' ,,;t'~ " , .~. ,,-' \ !...... / " " / /,~ / " ¡ .:..-.... ., "-'" -, ! ",/ : -,-;;; / /-' / 6CC '- ...../. '-600.", '; 'J , , , '. / ~f " " ","ó'O!ì ) ; f, , , '" EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan ", , C' , , _~oo ~: [ '-, '.., / r I I ,19 .. 18 / 16 _,,.,' Revised: January 2005 o 100 1200 ,.~ 114 112 E9 o ... œ ~'""-::;' . /"-- /, .- /' ,./ ,_/ / I I , ) I " 124 'h' I I ", I I Note: Many parcels have been subdivided since this map was originially prepared. This map does not attempt to update the major changes in ownership due to subdivision w "" _I > , I « Ý:i ~ ,',",) 112 (~, . 10 lr~J!L - BRODER BLVD t~ d~ lil[ H I 11M 11 J~~~"= ="= -~ ~ )) iJ· ¡ lHr::}~/ .~.~ ;: ~~~~J ,r~ __1 Il '- _ } ,¡4 T ]1 J :š ~ I~I' - )' U l { H l « Ie: !i 0 II - Ii [, ',.~.. >~~ ~ .=-11. . II) i~l_ r Ii I ~ ~~: ]1 f 1 ~l-----r II ' liB 'ce,- DU~UN~,L,VD .~¿j~~___~-m~g_ I ¡lC~__=-J UJ,[I-_, L II ~__, " _____..,. _~~:r:Ju I ,-~=F- ir --- ~ - ~__-:~ II I II J T, Jilr\- I 1\ - -, ~J" A~~II , -~~ I' H~~' _ _~~:)} -~ " ir~ == ---;'--:c-,-~~~II__~;:;==_-- 2---1 Planning Subareas J K R2 Planning Subareas May 2003 Revised: January 2005 NOTE The Internal system of local streets shown In thIs fIgure is Illustrative only A T assajara Gateway B Town Center - Commercial C Town Center - Residentia OFallon Gateway Hacienda Gateway Transit Center Tassajara Village Center Fallon Village Center ndustrial Park Foothill Residential \VJ d IV, ~~ ,,' ' '00 '-Vliz 6~ ~ ' ~~ <8:~ ~ \' 0 \'?' -11./ roR 'ì" Figure 4.2 Dublin Streets Cl City Boundary County Center Legend r::::J ~ 9 E F G H 1 () ii II i 1'1 ';1 ,I ) J " I '~ \\ ··-··-··_··_·___·_··_··_11_ I i . ! ··-··-··-···;··."-'.-.'''.iI-: ,¡ i" j i f i j I I i f ¡ 1 Ijíi¡¡~1 :1 :. f :. :¡ ¡ '\ > G G ..-..-..-..-..-..-.. i r ;f ~f I' fLfl CJc<~"c'\ l II ~., /~~ ~~~:l,;o~~<i~:,::\ \\\ II,!!} \\1 \, '\ : II[~" II ¡I, -",-"P ';, :, I I' \'-/, :à,''\, I!'=U ;~ß~ . ...-.., I .. ., '.... ._..~. r ! I I i . I I .",........"...""".. .",..--...,...",...--.. .--...",....",.. .....,.........--. .",..'.--- ............... --..."...-- ..,...",...(r--.' I' I; Sf: I3J¿¿r . I?{j 6TH ¡: " 8TH [lsT i .-. ! II " ¡i " i: II " I I: ¡: II Ii II II 1) 'I j¡ lí II 3,600 Feet 0,5 , Miles ,800 0.25 o o F :' ~ .. 1 \ ~-_. =~~~~c~~l~ .._u_~ A I Y'eAJ . Figure 7.28 Tassajara Village Concept Plan (Illustrative only) ---1 , I ) j ( ,J '" L >- --~- /'_-,- "- -1 __---- -1 i'~---Î ____ __ I --.- -,- ---__'--1 EASTERN DUBLIN Specific Plan January 2005 \!b\ (--/ -, J f ¡ 11----------,.; r-=-t------------'~ =r~~-- L__ ,----_~- Key Plan Revised: al Center Fallon Parkway Tassajara Creek Corridor