HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-028 Dublin Ranch West
AGENDA STATEMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 22,2005
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: PA 02-028 Dublin Ranch West submitted by
James Tong on behalf of Chang Su-O (aka Jennifer) Lin, et. a1. to consider
Planned Development (PD) Prezone; Annexation Application;
Amendment to the General Plan; Amendment to the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan; Planned Development (PD) Rezone/Stage I Development
Plan; Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Mitigation Monitoring &
Reporting Program; and Pre-Annexation Agreement. }
Report Prepared by: Mike Porto, Planning Consultant W'
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution recommending City Council certify the Dublin
Ranch West Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and adopt
a Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program.
2. Draft Resolution recommending City Council approve
Amendments to the General Plan and to the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan for the Lin Family property only (with proposed
Land Use Plans as existing and proposed for the project area as
Exhibit A and the Tables and Figures to be amended as a result of
the land use amendments as Exhibit B).
3. Draft Resolution recommending City Council approve a Planned
Development (PD) Prezone with Stage 1 Development Plan for
Dublin Ranch West (with proposed Prezoning as Exhibit A-I and
Development Plan as Exhibit A-2).
4. Draft Resolution recommending City Council direct Staff to file
an application with Alameda County Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCo) for annexation.
5. Project area map.
6. Dublin Ranch West Stage 1 Development Plan Submission.
7. Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR).
8. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FEIR).
9. October 5,2004 City Council Report and Minutes.
BACKGROUND ATTACHMENTS (by Reference):
10. Dublin General Plan.
11. Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
12. EIR for Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan
Amendment (including Addendum date May 4, 1993) SCH#
91103064; and Addendum dated August 22, 1994.
COPIES TO: Applicant(s)
Property Owners
PAfIle
ITEM NO. 'ð, ')
13. City Council Resolution Certifying Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
and General Plan Amendment Program EIR (Resolution #51-93).
14. City Council Resolution adopting Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and
General Plan Amendment; adopting findings and approving
overriding considerations; and adopting Mitigation Monitoring
Program ("Matrix") for EDSP EIR (Resolution #53-93).
15. Mitigation Monitoring Program ("Matrix") for EDSP EIR.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Hear Staff Presentation
2. Open Public Hearing
3. Hear Applicant's Presentation
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Deliberate
6. Adopt Resolution (Attachment 1) recommending City Council
certify the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
7. Adopt Resolution recommending City Council approve
Amendments to the General Plan and to the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan for the Lin Family property, only (Attachment 2)
8. Adopt Resolution recommending City Council approve a Planned
Development (PD) Prezone Stage 1 Development Plan for Dublin
Ranch West (Attachment 3 with the Prezoning as Exhibit A-I and
Development Plan as Exhibit A-2), and
9. Adopt Resolution recommending City Council direct Staff to file
an application with Alameda County Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCo) for annexation to the City and to the Dublin
San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) (Attachment 4).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project area, which is the subject of this annexation, contains approximately 189 acres of land. (See
Attachment 5, Project Area Map.) It includes property held by three separate owners as shown in Table
1 below with 184 acres (or 97% of the land) under one ownership. As it is yet to be annexed, the project
area is located within the unincorporated area of Alameda County within the City's Sphere ofInfluence
(SOl) near the northeasterly City limits. The project area generally consists of grasslands from high
hills in the north and west sloping to the south and south-east. Tassajara Creek runs north to south
through the area to its southerly point. The area currently is used for farming/grazing, firewood sales
and storage, several rural homesteads, agricultural outbuildings, and two structure of potentially historic
significance - a schoolhouse and dairy. The Tassajara Creek corridor is vegetated with native oaks and
riparian plant materials.
The project area is bounded: a) to the north by the Alameda County border with the adjoining lands in
Contra Costa County (unincorporated area) being used for agriculture; b) to the west by the Parks
Reserve Training Facility (PRTF) owned by the United States government within the City limits; and c)
to the south by a currently developing area within the incorporated City limits, a staging area for the
East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD), and a portion of the Tassajara Creek corridor designated for
a regional park. To the east, the northerly portion of the project area is separated from Tassajara Road
by unincorporated rural properties with other agricultural properties lying east of Tassajara Road. The
southerly (or "panhandle") portion of the project site abuts the incorporated City limits and right-of-way
for Tassajara Road. Approved development on recently annexed properties, a landscaping business, and
2
a private K-12 school are located across from the project site within the City limits along the east side of
Tassajara Road.
Approximately 11.6 acres of property within Dublin Ranch West is located across the County line to the
north in an unincorporated portion of Contra Costa County. However, this acreage is not included in the
project or its acreage totals. If this acreage is not already a separate legal parcel from the lands within
Alameda County, a separate parcel map will be required as a Condition of Approval to define and
establish those portions of the property within the two jurisdictions.
All of the property within Alameda County is within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area boundary
and has been included for planning purposes within the City of Dublin General Plan. The property
currently is zoned for agriculture by Alameda County.
The three property owners included within the area proposed for annexation and prezoning are listed in
Table 1, below. The Table shows the Assessor Parcel Number (APN) , name of owners, acreages,
locations, and the property owner's position on the annexation.
Table 1: Properties within the Project Area/Annexation Area
986-0004-005-01 6852 Tassajara Road 184.10ac Yes
986-0003-001 6060 Tassa'ara Road 3.28 ac Unknown
986-0004-003 Tassa'ara Road 1.60ac Unknown
Total: 188.98 ac
The proposed Project includes: 1) Certification of a Supplemental EIR (which includes a Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program); 2) Prezoning the entire area for annexation to the City of Dublin
and approval of a PD-Planned Development Zoning District with related Stage 1 Development Plan as
shown on Attachment 3, Exhibits A-I and A-2; 3) Amendment of the land uses shown the in General
Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan for the Lin Family property only; 4) Application for
Annexation of the entire project area to the City of Dublin and to the Dublin San Ramon Services
District (DSRSD); and 5) Approval of a pre-annexation agreement with the consenting property owner.
Dublin Ranch West, formerly known as the Wallis Ranch, was acquired by the Lin Family and is the
only portion of Dublin Ranch holdings west of Tassajara Road. The Lin Family, the applicant for the
requested action and major property owner, has been phasing out agricultural uses and is actively in
progress on the development of its Dublin Ranch holdings east of Tassajara Road. A preliminary
analysis by the applicant's engineer identified inconsistencies between the buildable area, along with
schematic development concepts, and the geography associated with the Tassajara Creek corridor.
Certain land uses currently shown in the City's General Plan and in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan are
incompatible with the topographic and physical constraints associated with Tassajara Creek and its
tributary creek setback requirements, its affect on vehicular access limitations, and the proposed right-
of-way realignment of Tassajara Road. In addition, the Dublin Unified School District, through an
official action taken in 2003, eliminated the elementary school from its plans as it is shown on the
General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use maps.
The development concept for the area strives to preserve the natural environment and create a
community that is compatible with the natural terrain. Approximately 107 of the 189 acres would be
converted from vacant or agricultural land to urban/suburban use. The number of units within the
3
project area is anticipated to range from 652 to 1,418 based on the density ranges with the mid-point at
1,053 units.
On October 5, 2004, the City Council held a study session on PA 02-028 for the Dublin Ranch West.
The study session was held in response to an application by the largest property owner, James Tong on
behalf of Chang Su-O (aka Jennifer) Lin et. aI., for annexation, zoning, and approval of a development
plan. At that time, City Staff identified a number ofthe issues, presented an analysis, and requested City
Council direction for obtaining consistency between prior planning for this area and planning changes
cumulatively resulting from approvals to date, new or changed policies for areas within the City
boundaries, and current technical studies.
The current proposal reflects the direction given by the City Council for four plan elements in this part
of the City: 1) Implementation of the Village policy, 2) Provision of required park lands, 3) Location
and characteristics of commercial uses and sites, and 4) Need, preference, and location for Public/Semi-
Public land uses.
ANALYSIS
Annexation:
The project site currently is within unincorporated portion of Alameda County, but also within the
Sphere of Influence (SOl) for the City of Dublin as established by the County Local Area Formation
Commission (LAFCo). The LAFCo is a State mandated local agency that oversees boundary changes to
cities and special districts, the formation of new agencies including incorporation of new cities, and the
consolidation of existing agencies. Although currently outside the City limits, the City has planned for
the eventual annexation of this area through the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan,
including most of the number of residential units anticipated and the project population which will
reside in those units. The major land owner has requested annexation prior to proceeding with
development.
Following annexation, the City would have jurisdiction and authority over plan approvals, and the
project will be serviced by the City and the analogous service districts. Also requested is annexation to
the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) which serves that portion of the City with water and
sewer services. The area already is within the SOl of the DSRSD. The application for annexation (or
reorganization, as referenced by LAFCo) includes a list of specific requirements with the most
significant being: I) prezoning by the City, and 2) a municipal services plan. The adopted prezoning
must be consistent with the City's General Plan.
Consent to annex to the City of Dublin has been provided by the owner of the Dublin Ranch West site
(the largest of the three property owners). Several attempts by Staff to contact the other two owners in
the project area regarding annexation have not been successful.
The current action before the Planning Commission is to consider recommending that the City Council
adopt a resolution authorizing Staff to initiate an application to LAFCo for the requested annexations of
the 189-acre project area to the City of Dublin and the DSRSD. The proposed annexations are
consistent with City's planning efforts and would provide for the logical and orderly extension of urban
services to the eastern portion of Dublin. After submittal of the annexation application, but prior to
LAFCo approval, the City will be required to enter into a tax transfer agreement for the area to be
annexed, and the property owners would be required to enter into agreements with DSRSD.
4
Amendments to the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan:
Development of the project area as currently designated in the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan would require substantial modifications to the natural topography created by the Tassajara Creek
corridor. The objective of this requested amendment is to preserve as much of the natural corridor as
possible. When actual topography is taken into consideration, remaining sites may be oddly configured
or too small to develop as designated. Therefore, a revised land use plan has been prepared and is now
proposed based on the preliminary planning studies by the major property owner and direction provided
by the City Council at the Study Session of October 5, 2004.
In general, the proposed land use amendments represent the following:
· More Open Space: Redesignation of land uses within the Tassajara Creek corridor to Open
Space - This action would remove land uses currently designated for Medium and Medium-High
Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial, Neighborhood Square, and Elementary School
generally shown in the Tassajara Village Area. Open Space acreage of hillside area along the
southwest boundary would decrease. However, Open Space along the Tassajara Creek corridor
would substantially increase.
· Tassa;ara Village Center: Reduction and reconfiguration of Tassajara Village Center - The
existing topography due to the Tassajara creekbed does not accommodate the illustrative layout
of Tassajara Village Center as shown in Figure 7.28 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Since
the remnant piece designated for a Neighborhood Square would be too small and isolated for that
use, the Neighborhood Square has been omitted from the location shown.
· Neighborhood Commercial: Removal all of the Neighborhood Commercial land use
designations from the Lin property - The area currently designated for Neighborhood
Commercial use is divided by the Tassajara Creek corridor. Unless redesignated, an isolated
remnant of land designated for this use would remain on the west side of Tassajara Creek
without access to Tassajara Road. In addition the anticipated realignment of Tassajara Road and
intersection with Fallon Road would substantially affect the commercial development potential
along the west side. A new configuration for Tassajara Village may be more appropriate on the
east and northeasterly frontage Tassajara Road near the Fallon Road intersection.
· Elementary School Site: Elimination of the Elementary School site - In 2003, the Dublin Unified
School District determined that an elementary school would not be necessary at the location
shown on the exiting land use plan and that adequate school sites can be provided elsewhere to
serve the Eastern Dublin area. This change allowed for an alternate use of the area designated as
an elementary school site. It also allowed for rethinking the location of the Neighborhood Park
sites which were designed to link with the school. In addition to expanding the Open Space
corridor, the elementary school site generally is proposed to be redesignated for Medium-High
Density Residential (14.1 to 25 units per gross acre). All new development would remain
subject to statutory school mitigation fees.
· Neighborhood Park Sites: Relocation and redesignation of Neighborhood Park space - The
existing plan shows two small Neighborhood Parks. Existing topography limits the development
potential of the area designated for Medium-Density Residential area shown between the
Tassajara creekbed corridor and the anticipated realignment of Tassajara Road in the southern
panhandle of the project area. One neighborhood park is proposed to be relocated to that
Medium-Density Residential site. The other Neighborhood Park site would be shifted
southward from a central location to an area currently designated for Low-Density Residential.
This area, which lies between the westerly side of Tassajara Creek and the southwesterly project
area boundary, functionally is too small for development as a stand-alone, low-density
5
neighborhood. It is more suitable for park land and can be better integrated with the proposed
open space trail system associated with the Tassajara Creek corridor.
As discussed at the October 5, 2004 Study Session, (see Attachment 9) the project would be
required to provide 10.5 acres of park land of which 1.8 acres have been provided in other areas
of Dublin Ranch. The balance required would be 8.7 acres. Under the proposed plan, the overall
acreage for the two Neighborhood parks and Neighborhood square combined would be reduced
from 14.6 acres to 8.8 acres which meet the minimum standard. Additionally, the overall open
space total will have increased by 9.8 acres, and the designation of 1.9 acres for Public/Semi-
Public use would provide flexibility for increasing recreational or special use areas, as needed.
. Public/Semi-Public: Designation of area near the Tassajara Creek corridor along the southerly
boundary of the project area for Public/Semi-Public use - The 1.9 acres are proposed for
redesignation from Medium Density Residential to Public/Semi-Public Use as described above
and at the City Council Study Session of October 2004.
. Bragg and Sperfslage Properties: No change in land use designations are requested or proposed
for the 5± acres within the 1 89-acre project annexation area, but outside the boundaries of the
184± acre Lin Family property.
The redesignation and reconfiguration of land uses will create a development pattern that is more
appropriate and functional for the designated uses with regard to the physical constraints and topography.
The proposed open space configuration would enhance the natural environment by preserving hillsides,
creek corridors and wildlife habitat. The additional open space along the creek corridor system also will
enhance Tassajara Road as a scenic corridor. Park land requirements would remain within the minimum
standard. Proposed land use designations for both the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
are shown as follows:
Table 2: Existing and Proposed Land Uses (in gross acres)
Existin
20.0 ac
64.1 ac
4.8 ac
11 .8 ac
2.8 ac
70.1 ac
9.7 ac
0.8 ac
o ac
184.1 ac
In addition, the proposed amendments would also result in changes to the following sections in each
document:
For both the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan:
City Boundaries - All figures and exhibits showing City boundaries would need to be amended. [The
City's boundaries will only be changed after LAFCO approvaL]
Land Use Plan - The Land Use Plan in both documents would need to be amended.
(Figure 1-1 a of the General Plan and Figure 4.1 of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan)
Land Use Summary - The Land Use Summary for the Eastern Dublin Area would need to be revised in
both Plans to reflect the change in acreage figures for the land uses affected by this amendment.
6
Changes to the land use also would require revisions to the number of units for the respective residential
land use categories and to the total number of units for all residential categories combined. Minor
changes also would need to be made to projected non-residential building area based on a reduction in
Neighborhood Commercial acreage and the addition of Publici Semi-Public use.
(Table 2.1 in the General Plan and Table 4.1 in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan).
Residential Street Sections - References and a diagram for Alternative Residential Street Sections and
cul-de-sacs would need to would need to be added. For the General Plan, amend Chapter 5.1.1, "6.
Residential Streets" and "7. Cul-de-Sacs." For the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, change language
under Program 5A describing acceptable right-of-way widths and other dimensions regarding cul-de-
sacs and in Chapter 7.5.2 Circulation SystemlResidential Streets. Add Figure 7.49A showing a
Residential Street Alternative with a 46-foot right-of-way. These changes represent currently
implemented street plans and improvements.
For the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (in addition to the modifications mentioned above):
Figure 2.4: Ownership Patterns - Amend to reflect the current ownership pattern.
Figure 4.2: Planning Subareas - Reconfigure Planning Area F Tassajara Village Center (corresponding
with Table 4.10) and Planning Area G Foothill Residential (corresponding with Table 4.8) to reflect the
amended Land Use Plan.
Appendix 3 - Amend to reflect the proposed land use changes for these Planning Subareas.
Appendix 4 - Amend to show revised acreage totals by land use for the existing owners.
Chapter 6 regarding Resource Management - Revise language for consistency regarding 6.2 Open
Space, 6.3.2 Biological Resources from information provided with the EIR, and 6.3.4 Visual Resources.
Revise Figures 6.1 through 6.3 to reflect current environmental information and changes to the parks
and open space plans.
Figure 7.28: Tassajara Village Concept Plan - Revise illustration to reflect the amended Land Use Plan
and existing topography.
Planned Development Prezoning/Stage 1 Development Plan:
The proposed Stage 1 Development Plan will serve as the prezoning prerequisite for annexation. The
proposed land uses are consistent with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan as amended by
this proposal. The area would be pre-zoned PD-Planned Development District which specifies the intent,
intensity of use, permitted uses, and conditional uses for each of the land use designations identified in
the General Plan and Specific Plan shown on the Prezoning Exhibit and Development Plan labeled as
Exhibits A-I and A-2 of Attachment 3 to the staff report.
The Stage 1 Development Plans include: the development concept, pennitted uses, conditional uses,
general development standards, project access & circulation plan, phasing plan, conceptual landscape
plan, and master infrastructure plan. The entire 1 89-acre area will be subject to prezoning and the Stage
1 Planned Development. Only the Lin Family will be a party to the Pre-Annexation Agreement.
Upon annexation, the Stage 1 PD would become City zoning. No development would be approved prior
to approval of a Stage 2 Development Plan adopted by the City identifying regulations for the
improvement and maintenance of the property in accordance with Dublin's Zoning Ordinance. Stage 2
Plans would not be approved until after annexation.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental impacts for the "Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment for the Eastern Extended
Planning Area" and the "Eastern Dublin Specific Plan" were analyzed in an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) prepared and reviewed in accordance with CEQA. The EIR was certified by the City of
7
Dublin in 1993 including revisions to Part I of the Responses to Comments relating to the Kit Fox, and
Addendum to the DEIR dated May 4,1993 and a DKS Associates Traffic Study dated December 15,
1992 (SCH#91103064) ("Eastern Dublin EIR"). Since then, a number ofEIRs, EIR addenda,
Supplemental EIRs, and Mitigated Negative Declarations have been prepared, reviewed, and adopted or
certified (as appropriate) for subsequent and specific projects within the greater project area. The City
also adopted a mitigation-monitoring program, which included numerous measures intended to reduce
impacts from the development of the Eastern Dublin area. The timing of these mitigation measures is
indicated in the City's EIR mitigation monitoring matrix (City Council Resolution # 53-93). The EIR
also identified some impacts from implementation of the General Plan/Specific Plan that could not be
mitigated. Upon certification of the EIR, the City adopted a statement of overriding considerations for
such impacts.
For the proposed Dublin Ranch West project area, a Supplemental EIR has been prepared in accordance
with CEQA laws (statutes) and regulations (guidelines). The project assessed in this Supplemental EIR
includes the annexation, amendments to the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
(including revised land uses), prezoning to Planned Development (PD) and the Stage 1 Development
Plan to allow the eventual subdivision and development in accordance with the approved plans. The
proposed project includes similar same land uses and densities as approved in the 1993 Eastern Dublin
General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan analyzed in the prior EIRs.
In accordance with CEQA procedures, the City prepared an Initial Study. The Initial Study concluded
that additional environmental review was required under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163.
A Notice of Preparation was circulated from for the required 30 day period, and the Draft Supplemental
EIR (DSEIR) was circulated for review from November 19, 2004 to January 3, 2005. The Final
Supplemental EIR presented for certification addresses the comments submitted on the DSEIR. Issues
of significance related to this project include: traffic and circulation, air quality, community facilities
(parks and schools) and habitat preservation for wildlife and endangered species. Specific endangered
flora and fauna were identified in the supplemental EIR included Congdon's tarplant, the California red-
legged frog (CRLF), and the California Tiger Salamander. In any case, implementation of development
within the Tassajara Creek area will require a streambed alteration agreement, with conditions, from
California Department of Fish & Game and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. An NPDES permit,
with conditions, also will be required from the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
The Initial Study and Draft Supplemental EIR thoroughly and comprehensively assessed the potential
for the project to cause or contribute to significant impacts beyond those identified in the 1993 EIR.
Where new potentially significant impacts were identified, appropriate mitigation measures have been
proposed to reduce or avoid the impacts. The mitigation measures are recommended for adoption as
part of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. However, even with mitigation, the City
Council will be required to adopt a new Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant
unavoidable impacts identified by the Eastern Dublin EIR as applicable to the proposed project.
PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
The goals and policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan require annexation and new development to
be revenue neutral. A Pre-Annexation Agreement, which is required by the City prior to its agreement
to request LAFCo's approval for annexation.
INCLUSIONARY ZONING/AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The development of the Lin Family property in Dublin Ranch West has been addressed in prior
Development Agreements regarding compliance with the City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance and
affordable housing requirements. The Fairway Ranch project was developed to accommodate the
affordable housing that would be applicable to the new residential development within Dublin Ranch.
8
No agreements currently are in place which would satisfy Inclusionary Zoning requirements for eventual
development of the Sperfslage and Bragg properties. Those properties would be required to comply
with the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance if and when each develops.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use amendments provide a more
practical and efficient land use pattern with the intent of preserving the topography of the Tassajara
Creek corridor, maintaining scenic corridor qualities, and enhancing the natural environment. The
proposed land use amendments are in the public interest protecting sensitive wildlife species in
Tassajara Creek, and the General Plan as amended will remain internally consistent. The Stage 1
Planned Development zoning is consistent with the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan,
as amended. It also serves as prezoning required for the annexation application to LAFCo. The EIR has
undergone a review process established by CEQA and addresses the environmental impacts associated
with the proposed project through mitigation measures or statements of over-riding consideration. The
requested annexation area is within the City's Sphere of Influence (SOl) and represents a logical step
towards incorporation of the SOl area. The proposed pre-annexation agreement ensures that the City's
costs associated with the annexation of the project area and subsequent development will be revenue-
neutral and not a burden or expense to the City's sources of funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission open the Public Hearing, deliberate, and adopt the
following resolutions:
1. Resolution (Attachment 1) recommending City Council certify the Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) and approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
2. Resolution recommending City Council approve Amendments to the General Plan and to the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan (Attachment 2).
3. Resolution recommending City Council approve a Planned Development (PD) Prezone Stage 1
Development Plan for Dublin Ranch West (Attachment 3 with the Prezoning Exhibit attached as
Exhibit A-I and Development Plan attached as Exhibit A-2).
4. Resolution recommending City Council direct Staff to file an application with Alameda County
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) for annexation to the City of Dublin and to the
Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) (Attachment 4).
9
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROPERTY OWNERS:
Chang Su-O (aka Jennifer) Lin, et. a1.
c/o James Tong
4690 Chabot Drive, Suite 100
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Roy & Eileen Sperfslage
6060 Tassajara Road
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Claire Bragg & Elvera Bragg
Bragg & Silva Trusts
P. O. Box 1896
Sonoma, CA 95476
APPLICANT:
Chang Su-O (aka Jennifer) Lin, et. a1.
c/o James Tong
4690 Chabot Drive, Suite 100
Pleasanton, CA 94588
LOCATION:
Unincorporated area of Alameda County bounded by
Contra Costa County line on the north; City of Dublin city
limits on west, south, and southeast; and unincorporated
Alameda County within the Dublin Sphere of Influence on
the northeast.
APN 986-0004-005-01
APN 986-0003-001
APN 986-0004-003
EXISTING ZONING:
Agricultural (Alameda County)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION &
EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN:
Single-Family Residential, Medium Density Residential,
Medium-High Density Residential, Neighborhood Park,
Neighborhood Square, Neighborhood Commercial, Open
Space, Elementary School, and Public/Semi-Public
(See Land Use Map)
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
In accordance with State law, a public notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within
300 feet of the proposed project, to advertise the project and the upcoming public hearing. A public
notice was also published in the Tri-Valley Herald and posted at several locations throughout the City.
10