Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 20, 2019 Agenda PacketAugust 20, 2019 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 1 of 6 REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, August 20, 2019 Council Chamber, 100 Civic Plaza DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL A G E N D A • Agendas and Staff Reports are posted on the City’s Internet Website (www.dublin.ca.gov) • Agendas may be picked up at the City Clerk’s Office for no c harge, or to request information on being placed on the annual subscription list, please call 833-6650. • A complete packet of information containing Staff Reports and exhibits relate to each item is available of public review at least 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting or, in the event that it is delivered to City Council members less than 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting, as soon as it is so delivered. The packet is available in the City Clerk’s Office and also at the Dublin Library. CLOSED SESSION 6:30 P.M. I. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: City Manager II. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN 941-0305-028-00 Agency negotiator: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager Negotiating parties: ASVRF Dublin Place, LP Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 3.1. American Muslim Appreciation and Awareness Month - August 2019 The City Council will consider proclaiming August 2019 as American Mus lim Appreciation and Awareness Month in the City of Dublin to acknowledge and promote awareness of the myriad of invaluable contributions of American Muslims in California and the United States. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Present the proclamation. 3.2. Report on Dublin Multi-Family Real Estate Market The City Council will receive an update on the City’s Multi-Family real estate market. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the presentation. 3.3. Employee Introductions New members of City Staff will be introduced: Michael Cass, Principal Planner, Community Development Department; Kristie Wheeler, Assistant Community Development Director, Community Development Department; David Kloss, Permit Technician, Public Works Department; and Lauren Marriott, Special Events Coordinator, Parks & Community Services Department. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Welcome the new City of Dublin Staff members. August 20, 2019 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 2 of 6 3.4. Public Comment At this time, the public is permitted to address the City Council on non-agendized items. Please step to the podium and clearly state your name for the record. COMMENTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with State Law, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on th e posted agenda. The Council may respond to statements made or questions asked, or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the matter. Any member of the public may contact the City Clerk’s Office related to the proper procedure to place an item on a future City Council agenda. The exceptions under which the City Council MAY discuss and/or take action on items not appearing on the agenda are contained in Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(1)(2)(3). 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the City Council with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the City Council who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor to remove the item. 4.1. Approval of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council meeting. 4.2. State of California Proposition 68 Per Capita Program Grant Funding The City Council will consider Staff’s request to apply for the State of California Proposition 68 Per Capita Program Grant Funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Approving the Filing of Application for Prop 68 Per Capita Grant Funds. 4.3. Batting Cage Facility Policy and Fee Structure The City Council will consider the proposed Cricket Batting Cage Facility Policy and Fee Structure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed Cricket Batting Cage Facility Policy and Fee Structure. 4.4. Avesta Development LLC Public Art The City Council will consider Avesta Development Group LLC's proposal for public art for its new Senior Care Facility, now under construction at 7601 Amador Valley Boulevard. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Avesta Development Group's proposal for public artwork, and adopt the Resolution Approving a Public Art Installation and Maintenance Agreement with Avesta Development Group LLC. for Public Art at 7601 Amador Valley Boulevard. 4.5. Adopt an Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Section 6.76 (Taxicabs) to Comply with State Laws AB 1069 and AB 939 Assembly Bill 1069 (Chapter 753, Statutes of 2017) and Assembly Bill 939 (Chapter 472, Statutes of 2018) amended the state laws regarding local regulation of taxicabs. The changes are intended to create a level playing field with “for-hire” ridesharing companies. Previously, taxicab operators were subject to the local laws of each city in which they operated, requiring licenses and fees for each jurisdiction where they provided services. AB 1069 allows cities to regulate taxicabs only if the taxicab is operated and substantially located within its jurisdiction. AB 1069 also imposes updated requirements for safety, drug and alcohol testing and increased penalties for noncompliance. AB 939 makes technical and clarifying changes to AB 1069. The attached Ordinance conforms the City’s taxicab laws to AB 1069 and AB 939, and makes additional revisions to reflect current City practices. On July 16, 2019, the City council waived the reading and introduced an Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Section 6.76 regarding Taxicabs. August 20, 2019 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 3 of 6 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading and adopt an Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Section 6.76 regarding Taxicabs. 4.6. Acceptance of Office of Traffic Safety Grant for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program The City Council will consider confirming its participation in and accepting a traffic safety grant for Dublin Police Services from the Office of Traffic Safety - Selective Traffic Enforcement Program. This grant program supports best practices and strategies to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary collision factors. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Confirming City of Dublin Participation in the State of California Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Grant Agreement. 4.7. Authorize the Purchase of Concession Products from US Foods, Inc. The City Council will consider authorizing the purchase of concession products for The Wave from US Foods, Inc. Staff desires to purchase concession items such as produce, beverages, and meats. US Foods, Inc. was selected because of the Government Premier Pricing Index, which is a multi-government competitive bidding process securing the best possible prices. The goods and products cost will exceed $45,000, which requires City Council approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Authorizing Purchase of Concession Products for The Wave from US Foods, Inc. 4.8. City Manager’s Employment Agreement The City Council will consider the Fifth Amendment to City Manager’s Employment Agreement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the Fifth Amendment to City Manager’s Employment Agreement and Adopt the Resolution Amending Salary Plan. 4.9. Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 to the Dublin Municipal Code to Ban Expanded Polystyrene for Use as Disposable Food Serviceware The City Council will consider introducing an ordinance adding Chapter 5.34 to the Dublin Municipal Code to ban expanded polystyrene for use as disposable food serviceware in the City of Dublin. The Ordinance will also mandate that food vendors and city facility users use only readily recyclable or compostable disposable food serviceware for prepared food. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading and INTRODUCE an Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to Title 5 (Public Welfare) to the Dublin Municipal Code. 4.10. Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement for 6999 Dublin Boulevard The City Council will consider approving a Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement with Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee (property owner). The property owner has requested participation in the Commercial Facade Improvement Grant Program to assist with the facade improvements to Dublin Plaza commercial center, located at 6999 Dublin Boulevard. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Approving a Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement with Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee for Facade Improvements to Dublin Plaza Commercial Center located at 6999 Dublin Boulevard. August 20, 2019 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 4 of 6 4.11. Award of Contract to Chrisp Company for On-Call Pavement Striping and Marking The City Council will consider awarding an On-Call Striping and Marking Contract to Chrisp Company for the installation and replacement of pavement striping and markings throughout the City on an as-needed basis. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Awarding a Contract for On-Call Striping and Marking to Chrisp Company. 4.12. Amendment to Legal Services Meyers Nave has requested that the City Council consider amending its legal services agreement with the City to increase the hourly rate for general legal services, litigation services, and reimbursable third-party services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement for Legal Services and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. 4.13. City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2019 The City Council will receive an informational report of the City’s investments through the quarter ending June 30, 2019 including a monthly transaction ledger. The City’s investment portfolio for this period totaled $286,533,795 (book value) with an average market yield of 2.13%. As required by the Policy, the City Treasurer (Administrative Services Director) affirms that the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. 4.14. Appointments to the City Council 2019 Ad-Hoc Audit Review Committee The City’s independent auditor, Badawi and Associates, has commenced the field work necessary to complete the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for year ending June 30, 2019. The City Council will consider the establishment of an Ad-Hoc Committee, comprised of two City Councilmembers, who will review the audit process and fi nal report with the auditors. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm the Mayor’s recommendation of Councilmembers Josey and Kumagai as the 2019 Ad-Hoc Audit Review Committee. 4.15. Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from June 1, 2019 - July 31, 2019 totaling $17,435,706.36. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. 4.16. Sponsorship of the Innovation TriValley Leadership Group's 2040 Vision Plan The City Council will consider supporting Innovation TriValley Leadership Group's 2040 Vision Plan in the amount of a $5,000 sponsorship. The 2040 Vision Plan will convene a cross-sector group of stakeholders to compile a vision plan for the Tri-Valley region centered around four economic drivers: transportation and mobility; land use/housing/transit-oriented development; workforce development; and innovation/entrepreneurship. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report and approve a sponsorship of the Innovation TriValley Leadership Group's 2040 Vision Plan in the amount of $5,000. August 20, 2019 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 5 of 6 4.17. Actions Taken During Council Recess, Budget Appropriation, Adopt Resolution Approving the Filing of Application for Specified Grant Funds, and Authorization for Purchase Agreements for Playground Equipment, Safety Surfacing and Pre- Engineered Concession/Restroom Building - Imagine Playground The City Council will receive a report on the administrative actions taken during the City Council recess between July 17, 2019 and August 19, 2019 of awarding a construction contract for the Imagine Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds project (CIP No. PK018); and will consider approving a budget change and authorizing purchase agreements with Specified Play Equipment Company and Romtec, Inc. for the playground equipment, safety surfacing, and a pre-engineered concession/restroom building at Dublin Sports Grounds Project; and will consider adopting the Resolution approving application for Dublin Sports Grounds all - abilities playground specified grant funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report on administrative actions taken during City Council recess, and adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Play Equipment and Safety Surfacing from Specified Play Equipment Company and Pre-Engineered Concession/Restroom from Romtec Inc. and approve the budget change for the Imagine Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds (CIP No. PK018); and adopt the Resolution Approving the Application for Dublin Sports Grounds All-Abilities Playground Specified Grant Funds. 4.18. Mayor's Recommendation for Appointments to Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commissions The City Council will consider the Mayor’s recommendations for appointments to fill unscheduled vacancies on the Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commissions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm the Mayor’s recommendations of Georgean Vonheeder -Leopold and Sawsan Wolski to the Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission; Shweta Agrawal as an alternate to the Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission; Michael McCorriston as an alternate to the Human Services Commission; or provide other appropriate direction. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION - NONE. 6. PUBLIC HEARING 6.1. Dublin Boulevard – North Canyons Parkway Extension Project The City Council will consider approving a General Plan Amendment, East ern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, certifying of the Final Environmental Impact Report, and establishing a Precise Alignment of Dublin Boulevard Right-Of-Way Lines. The City of Dublin, in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation, the City of Livermore, the Alameda County Transportation Commission, and Alameda County, proposes to extend Dublin Boulevard approximately 1.5 miles eastward through Dublin and unincorporated Alameda County, and connect to North Canyons Parkway in Livermore (Project), from its current terminus at Fallon Road. This roadway extension would provide four to six travel lanes and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and take the following actions: 1) Adopt the Resolution Certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report and Adoption of Environmental Findings under CEQA for the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons Parkway Extension Project; 2) Adopt the Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan related to the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons Parkway Extension Project; and, 3) Waive the reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance To Establish Right-Of-Way Lines for Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road and the Eastern City Limit. August 20, 2019 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 6 of 6 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – NONE. 8. NEW BUSINESS 8.1. Discussion on the City of Dublin's Sister City Activities The City Council will consider providing a one-time contribution to the Dublin Sister City Association in support of the Green & White Gala event in 2020, consider the Mayor traveling to Ireland at the invitation of the Wicklow County Council, and receive a report on the City's participation in Sister Cities International. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive a brief presentation from the Dublin Sister City Association ("DSCA" or "Association"); 2) Discuss and consider a one-time only contribution to DSCA of $5,000 towards the Green & White Gala in March, 2020; 3) Discuss and consider the Mayor traveling to Bray, Ireland in 2019 to participate in a planning meeting to discuss a visit by a City of Dublin delegation to Bray, Ireland in 2020; and, 4) Receive a report on the City's participation in Sister Cities International. 9. OTHER BUSINESS Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including comm ittee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234). 10. ADJOURNMENT This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a) If requested, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.2, this agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementa tion thereof. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office (925) 833- 6650 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Mission The City of Dublin promotes and supports a high quality of life, ensures a safe and secure environment, and fosters new opportunities. Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: American Muslim Appreciation and Awareness Month - August 2019 Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider proclaiming August 2019 as American Muslim Appreciation and Awareness Month in the City of Dublin to acknowledge and promote awareness of the myriad of invaluable contributions of American Muslims in California and the United States. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Present the proclamation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A DESCRIPTION: American Muslim Appreciation and Awareness Month acknowledges the rich history, contributions, and guiding virtues of American Muslims; and to commend all Muslim communities in California for the lasting positive impact they have made toward the advancement of our society. The City is asking citizens to acknowledge and promote awareness of the myriad of invaluable contributions of American Muslims in California and across the country and extend to them the respect and camaraderie every American deserves. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: N/A 3.1 Packet Pg. 7 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proclamation - American Muslim Awareness and Appreciation Month - August 2019 3.1 Packet Pg. 8 A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA “American Muslim Appreciation and Awareness Month – August 2019” WHEREAS, Freedom of religion holds distinction as a cherished right and a fundamental value upon which this nation was founded; and WHEREAS, enriched by the unparalleled diversity of its residents, the City of Dublin takes great pride in supporting individual religious freedoms and is strengthened by the many varied religious, political, and cultural traditions and contributions of its diverse population, including those Americans who practice Islam; and WHEREAS, Muslims have been part of U.S. history from the beginning and have contributed to the production of wealth and construction of the nation; they are also part of the rich history of the civil rights movement; and WHEREAS, over 90,000 Muslims reside in Alameda County and make innumerable contributions to the cultural, political, and economic fabric and well-being of California and the United States; and WHEREAS, Americans Muslim are teachers, lawyers, doctors, social workers, tech workers, nurses, and business owners among numerous other valued professions, as well as peace builders, activists, entrepreneurs, and politicians; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to acknowledge and promote awareness of the myriad of invaluable contributions of American Muslims in California and across the country and extend to them the respect and camaraderie every American deserves. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Dublin does hereby proclaim August 2019 as American Muslim Appreciation and Awareness Month to acknowledge the rich history, contributions, and guiding virtues of American Muslims and to commend all Muslim communities in California for the lasting positive impact they have made toward the advancement of our city. Mayor David G. Haubert Vice Mayor Melissa Hernandez Councilmember Arun Goel Councilmember Jean Josey Councilmember Shawn Kumagai 3.1.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 1. Proclamation - American Muslim Awareness and Appreciation Month - August 2019 Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Report on Dublin Multi-Family Real Estate Market Prepared by: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive an update on the City’s Multi-Family real estate market. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the presentation. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. DESCRIPTION: David Stark, Public Affairs Director for the Bay East Association of REALTORS, will share detailed information about the Dublin Multi-Family real estate market and how Dublin compares with other Tri-Valley communities. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: N/A ATTACHMENTS: None. 3.2 Packet Pg. 10 Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Employee Introductions Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: New members of City Staff will be introduced: Michael Cass, Principal Planner, Community Development Department; Kristie Wheeler, Assistant Community Development Director, Community Development Department; David Kloss, Permit Technician, Public Works Department; and Lauren Marriott, Special Events Coordinator, Parks & Community Services Department. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Welcome the new City of Dublin Staff members. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A DESCRIPTION: New members of City Staff will be introduced: Michael Cass, Principal Planner, Community Development Department; Kristie Wheeler, Assistant Community Development Director, Community Development Department; David Kloss, Permit Technician, Public Works Department; and Lauren Marriott, Special Events C oordinator, Parks & Community Services Department. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: N/A 3.3 Packet Pg. 11 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: None. 3.3 Packet Pg. 12 Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A DESCRIPTION: The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council meeting. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting 4.1 Packet Pg. 13 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REGULAR MEETING – JULY 16, 2019 DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1 REGULAR MEETING JULY 16, 2019 Closed Session 5:33 p.m. I. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: City Attorney II. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Vice Mayor Hernandez and Councilmember Kumagai Unrepresented employee: City Attorney III. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: City Manager IV. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Councilmembers Goel and Josey Unrepresented employee: City Manager V. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: APN 941-0305-028-00 Agency negotiator: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager Negotiating parties: ASVRF Dublin Place, LP Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance – The meeting was called to order at 7:15 p.m. by Mayor Haubert. The pledge was led by a member of Dublin Troop 905 and recited by the City Council, Staff, and those present at the meeting. Attendee Name Title Status David Haubert Mayor Present Melissa Hernandez Vice Mayor Present Arun Goel Councilmember Present Jean Josey Councilmember Present Shawn Kumagai Councilmember Present 2. Report on Closed Session – By consensus, the City Council agreed to reconvene to Closed Session after the end of the regular business. 3. Oral Communications 3.1. Presentation on Dublin San Ramon Services District “State of the District” The City Council received the report from Georgean Vonheeder-Leopold, Director of the Dublin San Ramon Services District, on the “State of the District”. 4.1.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 1. Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting (Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular Meeting) DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2 REGULAR MEETING JULY 16, 2019 3.2. Report on Wildfire Safety Efforts by PG&E By consensus, the City Council continued the item to a future date. 3.3. Public Comment Shawn Costello, Dublin resident, provided public comment. Nima Rafibakhsh, Dublin resident, provided public comment. Luke Wu, Dublin resident, provided public comment. 4. Consent Calendar 4.1. Approved the minutes of the June 17, 2019 Special City Council meeting; and the June 18, 2019 Special and Regular City Council meetings. 4.2. Approved the update to the Sports Fields and Stager Gymnasium Reservation Policies. 4.3. Received the notification of the City Engineer's pending approval of the Improvement Agreement Amendment for Tract 8169 Neighborhood 8 at Wallis Ranch (Fielding). 4.4. Presented the National Night Out Proclamation. 4.5. Approved the public art design by Tellart for the Dougherty Hills Dog Park. 4.6. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 75 – 19 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR THE FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN FALLON ROADAND THE EASTERN CITY LIMIT 4.7. Conducted the public hearing, deliberated, waived the reading and introduced an Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Section 6.76 regarding Taxicabs. 4.8. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 76 – 19 APPROVING A COMMERCIAL FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH AMAKARA COMPANY, INC. AND DUBLIN APARTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC 4.1.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 1. Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting (Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular Meeting) DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3 REGULAR MEETING JULY 16, 2019 4.9. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 77 – 19 APPROVING A SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE GRANT AGREEMENT WITH D’AMORE’S OF DUBLIN, LLC (d.b.a. COACH’S GRILLE) AND JJD-HOV DUBLIN LLC 4.10. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 78 – 19 APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICAITONS AND DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTACT FOR IMAGINE PLAYGROUND, CIP NO. PK0518 4.11. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 79 – 19 APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH WESCO GRAPHICS, INC. RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVED BY: Jean Josey, Councilmember SECOND: Melissa Hernandez, Vice Mayor AYES: Haubert, Hernandez, Goel, Josey, Kumagai 5. Written Communication – None. 6. Public Hearing – None. 7. Unfinished Business – None. 8. New Business 8.1. Study Session: Hotel Site Development Review at Corrie Center Site (PLPA- 2019-00019, -20, -21) Jerry Hunt, Applicant, made a presentation and responded to questions posed by the City Council. Jay Kumar, Applicant, responded to questions posed by the City Council. Shilpa Chandrashekar, Dublin resident, provided public comment. Georgean Vonheeder-Leopold, Dublin resident, provided public comment. 4.1.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 1. Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting (Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular Meeting) DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4 REGULAR MEETING JULY 16, 2019 By consensus, the City Council directed Staff to proceed with the proposed development. 8.2. Accessory Dwelling Units Policy Discussion The City Council received the presentation and directed to Staff to proceed with the policy matters as outlined in the report to encourage the production of accessory dwelling units in Dublin including composing a resolution to apply for the grant. 9. Other Business – Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234). By consensus, the City Council directed Staff to bring back an agenda item that would include a presentation to consider a $5,000 donation to Innovation Tri-Valley. By consensus, the City Council directed Staff to bring back an agenda item to discuss a community relationship with Wicklow County, Ireland. By consensus, the City Council directed Staff to bring back an item on the grant programs currently offered by the City in an effort to address requests for one-time support. . 9:34 p.m. The City Council reconvened to Closed Session. 10:37 p.m. Report on Closed Session The Mayor stated there was no reportable action out of Closed Session. 10. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:37 p.m. in honor of Staff Sgt. Sean Diamond and all of our fallen troops. Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________ 4.1.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 1. Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting (Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular Meeting) DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5 REGULAR MEETING JULY 16, 2019 City Clerk 4.1.a Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: 1. Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular City Council Meeting (Draft Minutes of the July 16, 2019 Regular Meeting) Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: State of California Proposition 68 Per Capita Program Grant Funding Prepared by: Lisa McPherson, Recreation Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider Staff’s request to apply for the State of California Proposition 68 Per Capita Program Grant Funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Approving the Filing of Application for Prop 68 Per Capita Grant Funds. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The State of California Proposition 68 Per Capita Program offers cities, counties and special district’s a minimum of $200,000 in grant funding for capital improvement projects. Grant funds can supplement, but not supplant, existing expenditures approved by the City Council. Projects not serving a “severely disadvantaged community” require a 20% match of funds. The City of Dublin median household income does not qualify as severely disadvantaged, so a 20 percent match will be required. Grant funds are allocated based on population and are one -time funds. DESCRIPTION: The City of Dublin is eligible to apply for state grant funding utilizing the Proposition 68 (Prop 68) Per Capita Program. Prop 68 (also known as the Parks and Water Bond Act of 2018), was placed on the ballot via Senate Bill 5 (DeLeon, Chapter 852, statutes of 2017), and was approved by voters on June 5, 2018. Prop 68 funding is available to local governments on a per capita basis for local park rehabilitation, creation, and improvements. Grant recipients are encouraged to utilize awards to rehabilitate existing infrastructure and to address deficiencies in neighborhoods lacking access to the outdoors. Additional funds are available for Per Capita grants to cities and districts in urbanized counties (a county with a population of 500,000 or more) providing park and recreation services within jurisdictions of 200,000 in population. 4.2 Packet Pg. 19 Page 2 of 2 This is not a competitive program; allocations will be calculated based on a questionnaire sent to eligible agencies. The City’s questionnaire was submitted by Staff to the Office of Grants on May 13, 2019. Eligible Projects must be for recreational purposes, either acquisition or development, subject to the following: • Acquisition and development projects cannot be combined. • Up to 5% of the allocation may be used for a Community Access Project. o Costs that occur during the project (public meetings, project management and accounting, interpretive and recreational programming, software, equipment, vehicles, activity supplies, educational and communication materials, and transporting materials or personnel). • Each project requires a separate Application Packet. • Multiple projects may be completed under one contract. • A project can only have one location. o One project that serves several parks is not permitted. • Grantees are encouraged to partner with other grantees on projects. The upcoming revised Parks and Recreation Master Plan will identify projects for consideration of grant funding. The grant funding process is as follows: • September 2019 – The Office of Grants announces grant funding allocations. • November 2019– Deadline for the Office of Grants to receive each agency’s resolution. • January 2020 – Deadline for the Office of Grants to receive grant applications. • March 2020 – Deadline for the City to receive and sign grant funding contracts. • December 2021 – Deadline for project(s) to be completed and open for public use. At the November 5, 2019 Council Meeting, Staff will present a report informing the City Council of the amount of funding the City was allocated, the 20% of matching funds required, and project(s) to which the grant funds will be allocated. Allocations are expected to be announced in late summer 2019. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution to Apply for Prop 68 Per Capita Grant Funds 4.2 Packet Pg. 20 RESOLUTION NO. XX - 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * * * APPROVING THE FILING OF APPLICATION FOR PROP 68 PER CAPITA GRANT FUNDS W HEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of the Per Capita Grant Program, setting up necessary procedures governing application(s); and W HEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the grantee’s Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of project application(s) bef ore submission of said applications to the State; and W HEREAS, the grantee will enter into a contract with the State of California to complete project(s); NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby: 1. Approves the filing of project application(s) for Per Capita program grant project(s); and 2. Certifies that said grantee has or will have available, prior to commencement of project work utilizing Per Capita funding, sufficient funds to complete the project(s); and 3. Certifies that the grantee has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project(s), and 4. Certifies that all projects proposed will be consistent with the park and recreation element of the City of Dublin general or recreation plan (PRC §80063(a)), and 5. Certifies that these funds will be used to supplement, not supplant, local revenues in existence as of June 5, 2018 (PRC §80062(d)), and 6. Certifies that it will comply with the provisions of §1771.5 of the State Labor Code, and 7. (PRC §80001(b)(8)(A-G)) To the extent practicable, as identified in the “Presidential Memorandum --Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in Our National Parks, National Forests, and Other Public Lands and W aters,” dated January 12, 2017, the City of Dublin will consider a range of actions that include, but are not limited to, the following: (A) Conducting active outreach to diverse populations, particularly minority, low- income, and disabled populations and tribal communities, to increase awareness within those communities and the public generally about specific programs and opportunities. (B) Mentoring new environmental, outdoor recreation, and conservation leaders to increase diverse representation across these areas. 4.2.a Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 1. Resolution to Apply for Prop 68 Per Capita Grant Funds (Propostion 68 Grant Resolution) ATTACHMENT 1 (C) Creating new partnerships with state, local, tribal, private, and nonprofit organizations to expand access for diverse populations. (D) Identifying and implementing improvements to existing programs to increase visitation and access by diverse populations, particularly minority, low-income, and disabled populations and tribal communities. (E) Expanding the use of multilingual and culturally appropriate materials in public communications and educational strategies, including through social media strategies, as appropriate, that target diverse populations. (F) Developing or expanding coordinated efforts to promote youth engagement and empowerment, including fostering new partnerships with diversity-serving and youth-serving organizations, urban areas, and programs. (G) Identifying possible staff liaisons to diverse populations. 8. Agrees that to the extent practicable, the project(s) will provide workforce education and training, contractor and job opportunities for disadvantaged communities (PRC §80001(b)(5)). 9. Certifies that the grantee shall not reduce the amount of funding otherwise available to be spent on parks or other projects eligible for funds under this division in its jurisdiction. A one-time allocation of other funding that has been expended for parks or other projects, but wh ich is not available on an ongoing basis, shall not be considered when calculating a recipient’s annual expenditures. (PRC §80062(d)). 10. Certifies that the grantee has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the contract shown in the Procedural Guide; and 11. Delegates the authority to the City Manager, or designee (Parks and Community Services Director) to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary f or the completion of the grant scope(s); and 12. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2019, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ City Clerk 4.2.a Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 1. Resolution to Apply for Prop 68 Per Capita Grant Funds (Propostion 68 Grant Resolution) Page 1 of 4 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Batting Cage Facility Policy and Fee Structure Prepared by: Lisa McPherson, Recreation Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider the proposed Cricket Batting Cage Facility Policy and Fee Structure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed Cricket Batting Cage Facility Policy and Fee Structure. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Projected annual revenue considering current cricket cage use at the Dublin Youth Sports Organization rate of $15.00 per hour is $22,050. The amount collected will likely be reduced based on the planned use for Cricket for Cubs, who have a credit to use against their initial investment in constructing the cages. DESCRIPTION: At the March 5, 2019 City Council meeting, City Council approved termination of an agreement between the City of Dublin and Cricket for Cubs for exclusive use of the Emerald Glen cricket batting cages (effective January 1, 2020). Staff was directed to develop policies and fees for the two (2) cricket batting cages and review the polices and fees at a Parks and Community Services Commission (Commission) meeting and to forward a recommendation for City Council approval. At the June 17, 2019 Commission meeting, the Commissioners reviewed cricket batting cages policies and fee structure. The Commission voted 6-0-0 to recommend the presented policies and fee structure. Staff researched cricket batting cage policies and fees from neighboring cities who utilize cages for cricket (San Ramon and Fremont). The following is a summary of Staff's research: 4.3 Packet Pg. 23 Page 2 of 4 The City of Fremont and the City of San Ramon are two cities who currently operate City multi-use batting cages. Both cities require a completed rental application to rent the cages. The City of San Ramon has two (2) multi-use batting cages which are primarily used by City co-sponsored organizations when they rent the baseball fields (batting cages are included with field rental). When the fields are closed for renovation or not rented by City co-sponsored organizations, the batting cages are unlocked for the public to rent. The City charges the following fees to rent the cages: o Non-profit = $14.65 per hour per cage o Resident = $14.65 per hour per cage o Non-Resident = $28.61 per hour per cage The City of Fremont has five (5) multi-use batting cages which are available for the public to rent on a first come first serve basis, with a 4 8-hour notice prior to the requested rental time. These cages have a locking system (Cell Gate) which are programmed by City staff. The locking system generates an access code needed to unlock the gate, which staff than emails to the renter. Cell Gate software does not have the capability to generate access codes through the departments existing registration software; therefore, this software is an additional one-time cost of $12,000, and $150 per month service fee. The City of Fremont charges the following fees to rent the cages: o Non-profit = $10.00 per hour per cage o Resident = $15.00 per hour per cage o Non-Resident = $20.00 per hour per cage Staff conducted a meeting on May 6, 2019 to discuss and receive feedback on rules, reservation procedures, policies and fee structure with the following cricket organizations: Cricket for Cubs Dublin Cricket Academy East Bay Youth Cricket Association San Ramon Cricket Association Dublin Cricket League (invited though didn’t attend the meeting) Cricket Batting Facility Rules Staff utilized the City of Fremont’s batting cage rules and cricket organization feedback from the May 6, 2019 meeting to establish the f ollowing proposed cricket batting cage facility rules: o Cage facility is permit-only facility o Cage facility is for cricket only o Only molded rubber cleats, synthetic turf shoes, or other athletic shoes are allowed in the cage facility o Only balls and bats, usually associated with cricket are allowed in the cage facility o All batters must wear a helmet at all times while in the cage facility o Only one (1) batter is allowed in each tunnel at any time o Spectators or batters on-deck must stay outside the cage facility o No practice swings or swinging of bats allowed outside the cage facility at 4.3 Packet Pg. 24 Page 3 of 4 any time o No unauthorized persons shall enter the cage facility while it’s rented o Renters are responsible for cage facility while it’s rented o Check that the cage facility is closed and locked after rental Reservation Procedures, Polices and Fee Structure Staff considered both the community and cricket organizations usage when developing the proposed reservation procedures, polices and fees. Staff met with the cricket organizations on May 6, 2019 to discuss rental priority use, the rental process, fee structure and usage requirements. During the meeting Staff received the following feedback from the cricket organizations: Priority usage, process, payment and fee schedule should be consistent as to sports fields: • Dublin Youth Sports Organizations should have first priority • A rental agreement should be submitted to Staff • Dublin Youth Sports Organizations should pay the same fee as renting turf fields ($7.00 per hour per cage) • Minimum of one hour for rental usage and no maximum of rental usage On May 30, 2019, the City received additional comments from Cricket for Cubs after attending the meeting: • For teaching purposes cages should be offered from 3:00 to 7:00 PM for youth organizations to rent and from 7:00 to 8:00 PM (during available daylight) for the Community to rent • For youth and adults to rent the cages at the same time, a steel fence would need to be installed to separate the cages since their skill levels are different • The run up will need to be leveled and watered multiple days througho ut the week • Per cage per hour rate = $7.50 After the feedback received by the user groups, Staff is recommending the following: Rental Information Staff Recommendation Priority Use 1. Dublin Youth Sports Organizations 2. Residents 3. Non-Residents Process Submit a rental agreement application between hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM Monday through Friday; renter will receive a cage access code after agreement has been approved (code will take up to 48 hours) Payment In full upon reservation Usage Requirements Minimum of one (1) hour to rent per day. Maximum of three (3) hours to rent per day Fee Structure Per hour for entire cage facility Dublin Sports Organizations = $15.00 Resident = $18.00 Non-Resident = $22.00 Priority use will be given to Dublin Youth Sports Organizations; however, usage requirements were established to meet the needs for both community and cricket youth 4.3 Packet Pg. 25 Page 4 of 4 sports organization use. Additionally, the cage facility must be rented in its entirety (both cages at the same time) as additional improvements would be required to separate the two cages for single use. The proposed fee does not currently cover the actual cost to administer and maintain cage facility operations, thus the City would be subsidizing the cage rental program by approximately 50 percent. To fully recover costs for administration and maintenance, charges for the cage facility would be as follows: Dublin Sports Organizations = $29.00 Resident = $34.00 Non-Resident = $41.00 Given the feedback from the cricket organizations and to stay in line with the fee structure of neighboring communities, the proposed fee structure was established for the first year. The approved polices and fee structure will be incorporated into the current Tennis Courts rental packet. Staff will return in 2021 with cage facility data and propose to adjust fees accordingly. Staff respectively request that Council approve the Parks and Community Services Commission recommendations for the cricket batting cage facility policies and fee structure. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH A copy of the Staff Report was provided to local cricket organizations. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cage Facility Reservation Policies, Rules and Fees Structure 2. Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cage Facility Rental Agreement 4.3 Packet Pg. 26 City of Dublin Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cage Facility Reservation Policies, Rules and Fees Schedule 1. Rental Categories • Public Agencies: Agencies serving the City of Dublin including Alameda County, Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD), Dublin Unified School District, etc. • Dublin Sports League Organizations: Organized sports league groups with current IRS non-profit status, whose membership is open to the public. The organization’s membership must be as listed below: o Youth Sports League Organizations – at least 75% Dublin residents. o Adult Sports League Organization – at least 51% Dublin residents. • Non-Profit Organizations: Organized non‐profit groups with current 501(c) (3) or 501(c)(4) IRS status. The submission and approval of a “Non-Profit Organization Verification Form” must be on file with the City. o Groups applying under the Non-Profit Organization classification must have an “Organization Verification Form” on file with the following two documents: ▪ 1) Bylaws ▪ 2) Current I.R.S. Tax Exempt Letter o Groups claiming Dublin Sports League Organization must provide a current membership roster. ▪ For Youth Sports League Organizations, 75% of memberships must reside in Dublin and for Adult Sports League Organizations, 51% of memberships must reside in Dublin. Applications will not be accepted without these items. • Resident: Individuals must reside or own property within Dublin City Limits. • Non -Resident: Individuals not residing within Dublin City Limits. • Commercial Uses: Companies or individuals whose events have an admission fee or include the sales of goods or services. 2. Tennis Courts Rental Categories Priority Use: 3. Tennis Courts Rental Process • To reserve a court, a rental agreement must be submitted for approval and is accepted between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday, holidays excepted. • To receive a resident rate, the applicant (i.e. the person responsible for the activity, payment of fees and provision of insurance) must live or own property within Dublin City Limits. Verification of residence address will be required (valid California driver’s license or current utility bill). • Approval can take up to five (5) business days and notification of application status will be e-mailed. • The City reserves the right to book additional events before or after an applicant’s confirmed rental time. 4. Tennis Courts Rental Deposit For rentals that are for league play, a tournament or commercial use, a $100.00 Deposit is due at the time that the application is submitted. The deposit is refundable and will be refunded within 30 days after rental completion, providing there are no violations of the Tennis Courts and/or excessive cleaning or damages to the courts. 5. Tennis Courts Rental Fee Balance Final payment of rental fees must be made no later than 30 days after receipt of an approved rental contract/confirmation. Payments not received by this deadline may result in cancellation of the rental and forfeiture of the deposit. If the application is received less than 30 days prior to the first date of the rental, then payment is due immediately upon receipt of a rental contract/confirmation. Checks should be made payable to: City of Dublin. Cash, VISA, MasterCard, Rental Dates Public Agencies, Dublin Sports Leagues and Residents Non-Residents and Commercial January – March November 15 December 1 April – May February 15 March 1 June – August April 15 May 1 September – December July 15 August 1 4.3.a Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: 1. Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cage Facility Reservation Policies, Rules and Fees Structure (Batting Cage Facility Rentals) Discover and American Express are also accepted. 6. Insurance Certificate For rentals that are for league play, a tournament or commercial uses, all applicants shall provide the City of Dublin with a valid Certificate of Liability including the endorsement page written through carriers acceptable to the City of Dublin. Such certificate shall provide bodily injury and property damage liability protection at a minimum of $1,000,000 per occurrence. The applicant must be specified as the insured. The certificate shall name the “City of Dublin, its officers, employees, agents and volunteers” as an “additional insured” in conformance with the hold harmless agreement and the applicant’s insurance shall be primary to any insurance carried by the City of Dublin and/or the Dublin Unified School District. The certificate shall be properly executed with the original signature of the authorizing agent of the insurance company. Note: Please contact your insurance provider to check if your homeowner’s policy may be extended to cover your facility rental. 7. Cancellations, Changes and Refunds (courts and cage facility) • Cancellation requests must be in writing by the applicant and sent by emailing parksandcommunityservices@dublin.ca.gov. • Refunds and Credits are not issued for unused hours. • Occasionally, it may be necessary to reschedule, relocate or cancel a request previously approved. In this event, the group or individual will be given as much advanced notice as possible. • Refunds per cancellation requests will be handled as follows: 30 days or more 29 days or less Rainouts Security deposit and rental fees refunded less $5 processing fee. Security deposit and 50% of rental fees refunded. Credit will be issued for cancellations due to rain if the office is notified within 48 hours (via phone or email) after scheduled rental date. 8. General Rules (courts and cage facility) • The minimum rental is one (1) hour. • Renters must leave promptly when scheduled time has ended. • Each renter must provide their own equipment. • Rental hours of use must include the amount of time needed for use, including set up and clean up. • Refunds are not given for unused hours. • Rentals must be vacated by the time specified on the Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cages Facility rental receipt. • Storage is not available either before or after use. • Parking is permitted in painted parking stalls only. • Vehicles parked illegally will be cited. • The consumption, serving and/or selling of alcoholic beverages is not permitted in City of Dublin parks. • All garbage or other waste must be properly disposed of prior to vacating courts or cage facility. • Requests for exceptions to the policy must be submitted in writing no less than ten (10) business days prior to the rental date and receive written approval from the Parks and Community Services Director, or designee. • Prohibited: o Use of generators. o SMOKING in City of Dublin parks. o Paste, tack, glue or posting of any sign, placard, advertisement or inscription, or to erect any sign in the park. o Selling, vending, or peddling items. o Use of amplification equipment. o Bikes, skateboards and other uses unrelated to tennis or batting use. o Hitting of balls against the tennis or cage fences inside or outside. Tennis Courts Rules • Courts are for tennis use only. • Only non-marking tennis shoes allowed on courts. • Individual and group rentals are limited to one (1) booking per week, Sunday through Saturday. Cricket Batting Cage Facility Rules • Cage facility is permit-only facility. • Cage facility is for cricket only . 4.3.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: 1. Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cage Facility Reservation Policies, Rules and Fees Structure (Batting Cage Facility Rentals) • Only molded rubber cleats, synthetic turf shoes, or other athletic shoes are allowed in the cage facility. • Only balls and bats, usually associated with cricket are allowed in the cage facility. • All batters must wear a helmet at all times while in the cage facility. • Only one (1) batter is allowed in each tunnel at any time. • Spectators or batters on-deck must stay outside the cage facility. • No practice swings or swinging of bats allowed outside the cage facility at any time. • No unauthorized persons shall enter the cage facility while it’s rented. • Renters are responsible for the cage facility while it’s rented. • Check that the cage facility is closed and locked after rental. 9. Locations • Cricket Batting Cages Facility is located at Emerald Glen Park. • Tennis Courts are located at the following: All lights are self-operated and are programmed to shut-off by 10:00 PM, daily. 10. Tennis Courts Walk-On Use There is a game limit of two-consecutive sets or a maximum of one (1) hour of play when players are waiting. Children and adults have equal priority. Following are time periods at Emerald Glen Park, Fallon Sports Park, Kolb Park, Schaefer Ranch Park, Sean Diamond Park, Dublin High School: • Weekday Use: 7:00 AM – 5:00 PM, Monday – Friday • Weeknight Use: 5:00 PM – 10:00 PM, Monday – Friday • Weekend Use: 7:00 AM – 10:00 PM, Saturday – Sunday 11. Tennis Courts Availability To provide an adequate number of courts available for walk-on use by the community , the courts available for reservation are listed below: Location Courts Available for Reservation Lights *Dublin High School Courts 1 through 5 No Emerald Glen Park Courts 3 and 4 Yes Fallon Sports Park Courts 1 and 2 Yes *Dublin High School Tennis Complex • School not in Session, Daily, 7:00 AM to Sunset. • School in Session, Saturday and Sunday ONLY, 7:00 AM to Sunset. 12. Tennis Courts Group Rental Availability • A maximum of two (2) groups will be allowed to reserve for weekday play per week. • A maximum of two (2) groups will be allowed to reserve for weeknight play per week. • A maximum of one (1) group will be allowed to reserve for weekend play per week. • A maximum of three (3) hours per day will be available for each rental. 13. Tennis Courts Rental Fee Schedule Location Court Quantity Lights* Reservations Days of Operation Dublin High School 8 No Yes Sa & Su, School in Session Su – Sa, School not in Session Emerald Glen Park 4 Yes Yes Daily Fallon Sports Park 4 Yes Yes Daily Kolb Park 2 Yes No Daily Schaefer Ranch Park 1 No No Daily Sean Diamond Park 1 N No n NO Daily Rental Category Hourly Fee per court Public Agencies Non-Profit Organizations $5.00 4.3.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: 1. Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cage Facility Reservation Policies, Rules and Fees Structure (Batting Cage Facility Rentals) 14. Cricket Batting Cage Facility Priority Use • Dublin Sports League Organization-Youth 75% Residents -Reservations accepted in advance of all other group. • Resident-Reservations accepted up to twelve (12) months in advance of requested use. • Non-Residents-Reservations accepted up to ten (10) months in advance of requested use. 15. Cricket Batting Cage Facility Rental Process • Submit a rental agreement application between hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM Monday through Friday; renter will receive an access code after agreement has been approved (code will take up to 48 hours). • Payment in full upon reservation. 16. Cricket Batting Cage Facility Rental Availability • Daily from 7:00 AM to Sunset. o Minimum of 1 hour to rent per day. o Maximum of 3 hours to rent per day. 17. Cricket Batting Cage Facility Rental Fee Schedule The City of Dublin reserves the right to refuse to grant use of the City’s tennis courts and cricket batting cages facility to any person or group if such use is deemed to be contrary to the best interest of the City and/or its residents. Residents $10.00 Non-Residents $12.00 Commercial Residents $15.00 Commercial Non-Residents $18.00 Rental Category Hourly Fee per cage Dublin Sports Organizations $15.00 Residents $18.00 Non-Residents $22.00 4.3.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: 1. Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cage Facility Reservation Policies, Rules and Fees Structure (Batting Cage Facility Rentals) Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cage Facility Rental Agreement Phone: 925-556-4500 Email: parksandcommunityservices@dublin.ca.gov FACILITY INFORMATION TENNIS FACILITY: Emerald Glen Park Fallon Sports Park Dublin High School TENNIS COURTS: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 CRICKET BATTING CAGE FACILITY at Emerald Glen Park: RENTER INFORMATION: CATEGORY: Public Agency Dublin Sports Leagues Non-Profit Resident Non-Resident Commercial Name of Responsible Party: _____________________________________ Email: _____________________________________ Name of Organization/Company: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________City/State___________________________Zip:________________ Phone Number: Home__________________________ Cell__________________________ Work_______________________ RENTAL DATE INFORMATION: USE TYPE: Practice League Game Tournament Game Commercial Use Other: ________________________________________________________________________________ ANTICIPATED TOTAL ATTENDANCE: __________________________ CHILDREN IN ATTENDANCE: _________________________ Rental Date: Day: Start Time: : _ _ AM/PM End Time: _ : _ _ AM/PM Rental Date: Day: Rental Date: Day: Start Time: ___: ____ AM/PM End Time: ___:___ AM/PM Start Time: ___: ___ AM/PM End Time: ___:___ AM/PM Rental Date: Day: Start Time: : _ _ AM/PM End Time: _ : _ __ AM/PM Please circle all that apply: Admission/Donation (Fundraiser): Yes/No Proceeds for: _________________________________________ Open to the public: Yes/No Insurance form submitted Yes/No Deposit Paid Yes/No TENNIS COURTS AND CRICKET BATTING CAGE FACILITY RESERVATION POLICIES AND GENERAL RULES: Initial _________ By submitting a Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cages Facility rental agreement; I have read, agree to and will abide by the Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cages Facility policies and rules. HOLD HARMLESS AND COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT: The undersigned, hereby agrees to be responsible for any damage to the Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cages Facility occurring during and by this use and agrees to be responsible for the conduct of all persons attending this function. Applicant further agrees to be responsible for any accident or injury occurring to anyone during and by this use, and agrees that the City of Dublin, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, shall not be responsible for any such injury or loss, except as arises from the sole willful act, omission or sole negligence of the City of Dublin, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers. The undersigned has received a copy of the Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cages Facility Use Policy and agrees to comply with the rules and regulations listed therein. _________________________________________ ________________ ____________________________________ Signature of Responsible Party Date Organization Reservation Number: Staff: 4.3.b Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: 2. Tennis Courts and Cricket Batting Cage Facility Rental Agreement (Batting Cage Facility Rentals) Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Avesta Development LLC Public Art Prepared by: La Shawn Butler, Parks and Community Services Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider Avesta Development Group LLC's proposal for public art for its new Senior Care Facility, now under construction at 7601 Amador Valley Boulevard. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Avesta Development Group's proposal for public artwork, and adopt the Resolution Approving a Public Art Installation and Maintenance Agreement with Avesta Development Group LLC. for Public Art at 7601 Amador Valley Boulevard. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This is developer-installed artwork. There will be no City Funds expended for the artwork itself. DESCRIPTION: Avesta Development LLC is developing Elegance at Dublin, a four -story, 66,787 square-foot, 80-unit senior care facility, located on the northwest corner of Amador Valley Boulevard and Donohue Drive. (Attachment 1) As part of the Site Development Review approval by the City Council, Avesta opted to install public art versus paying the in-lieu fee. Per the Public Art Master Plan, all private developers are required to present the proposed artwork for review at a Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission (HCAC) meeting. Upon recommendation by the Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission, the developer is also required to seek final approval of the proposed artwork by the City Council. Artist Selection Process The Public Art Master Plan encourages private developers to follow an artist selection process consistent with the City’s policies for selection of artists and artworks. Avesta employed a process similar to the City’s own “invitational” method, in which artists are 4.4 Packet Pg. 32 Page 2 of 3 invited to submit designs, based on past works and demonstrated ability to respond to the project conditions or other non-aesthetic program goals. In this case, the builder's goals included creating a peaceful, calm environment, encouraging outdoor socialization and creating a landmark and wayfinding piece. Artist Matthew Placzek specializes in evidence-based design, in which data and ideas from environmental psychology, architecture, neuroscience and behavioral ec onomics influence the design. He has created artwork for dozens of healthcare and senior living facilities, often featuring calming, nature-inspired images, which have been shown to improve patient recovery times, decrease depression and boo st morale. Mr. Placzek's work is also included in the Ronald Reagan Presidential Collection, the U.S. embassy in Prague, presidential residences in Taiwan and Austria and corporate art collections including Guinness Brewing, BMW Corporation, Caterpillar Worldwide and Dayton Hudson. (Attachment 2) Design Proposal Mr. Placzek's proposed piece consists of three colorful butterflies mounted on the facade of the building and a butterfly screen enclosing a front patio. Three large butterflies with colorful acrylic wings will b e affixed to the side of the building and will serve as a landmark and wayfinding device. A screen of clustered butterflies will enclose a peaceful outdoor patio where residents can interact with each other, as well as staff and guests. (Attachment 3) Staff Review Preliminary designs were reviewed internally by the City’s Planning Division and the Parks and Community Services Department. Staff has no concerns with the safety or design of the proposed artwork. Community Outreach In addition to including City Staff in the review and critique of the artwork, as specified in the Public Art Master Plan, Avesta displayed the proposed work at the Dublin Senior Center on Wednesday, June 12, 2019 10:30 a.m.- noon. This day and time were chosen because it is the busiest time of the week at the Senior Center, just prior to lunch and the weekly Bingo game. As required, Avesta mailed notices to neighbors within 300 feet of their property, inviting them to view and comment on the design. Walk-up visitors at the Dublin Senior Center were also encouraged to view the proposal and comment. Approximately 40 people passed the table and stopped to offer feedback about the art, all overwhelmingly positive. Six comment cards were received, all in favor of the art. One person asked the developer to consider the addition of colorful acrylic on the butterfly screen. However, the artist has advised that adding acrylic in the butterfly screen would require different construction methods that are not feasible within the budget. (Attachment 3) On July 11, 2019 the Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission voted to recommend the Artwork 3-2. The Commissioner’s expressed the design and display of light within the design added value. The Commissioners did want the Artist to ensure the piec es would be dimensionally appropriate for the location of the lattice. The Artist indicated the two 4.4 Packet Pg. 33 Page 3 of 3 Butterfly pieces would take approximately half the space in question and would satisfy the Commissions concerns. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: Strategy 4: Focus efforts on ways to strengthen the City's economic vitality, including the Downtown, through public investment and economic development. This building is located within Downtown Dublin; Public Art is a physical improvement to the property. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: A courtesy notice was provided to Avesta Development LLC. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Avesta Public Art Location 2. Matthew Placzek Artist Background and Resume 3. Avesta Public Art Proposal - Artist Statement and Renderings 4. Avesta Public Art Comments 5. Resolution Approving a Public Art Installation and Maintenance Agreement with Avesta Development Group LLC. for Public Art at 7601 Amador Valley Boulevard 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement 4.4 Packet Pg. 34 UPCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTCOMPACTT GENERAT O R DONOHUE DR IVE PROPERTY LINE, TYP. (E) FIRE STATION 106" X 90" TRANSFORMER CLEARANCE PROPERTY LINE, TYP. 49'-0"5'-0" 14 39 43 22 16 18'-0" 22 22 ALIGN SCORING W/ WALL, TYP. 23 TYP. 18'-0" 21'-3"20'-0 " 1 TYP. 9'-0"4'-0 " 8 8 4 TYP. 1 11 TYP. 5'-0"TYP. 22 6 TYP.EQ.EQ. 41 TYP. 39 31 15 13 TYP. 44 MATCHLINE, SE E S H E E T A 1. 0 2 MATCHLIN E, S E E S H E E T A 1. 0 2 3 7 ALIGN PAVING W/ COL., TYP. ALIGN SCORING W/ MULLION, TYP. EQ.EQ. 1 6'-0"9'-0 " 22 TYP. 8 TYP. 30 TYP.14'- 2 " 10'-9"2'-8" F7 A1.11 STAIRS 3 RISERS @ 6.5" 2 TREADS @ 14" 22 247 19'-8 " 33 ALIGN PAVING W/ WALL, TYP. 1'-6" CLR. TYP. 1'-6" 221 TYP. 12'-2" SCORE EQUALLY 22 50 6'-2" EQ.EQ. 16'-4" 6'-6"26'- 4 " ALIGN 5'-0" 4'-0" CLR. TYP.22 5'-8" 7 ' - 0 " 43 ' -1 " 6 ' - 0 " 49 11' -0 "6'-10"5 TYP. 5 TYP. LIMIT OF W O R K LIMIT OF WORKL IM IT OF WORK 3 20'-0" CLE A R O F W A L L 34'-5" STE P P E D W A L L 6'-7" T.O.W. HEIGHT 4'-9" T.O.W. HEIGHT 7'-0" 22 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 9 F9 A1.12 22 D11 A1.11 12 TYP. 48 H G F E D C B A 6910 5 31112874 2 1 B A H G F E D C 1314 6910 5 31112874 2 11314 NO.ISSUEDATE 01CLIENT REIVEW08.29.06 02CLIENT REIVEW12.07.06 03PRELIMINARY PRICING01.25.07 04DEMOLITION BID02.13.07 05DEMOLITION PERMIT SET02.28.07 06ISSUE FOR PERMIT / BID04.02.07 07ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION05.16.07 08ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 06.20.07 SHEET NO: DATE: PROJECT NO: THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT IS PROPRIETARY TO LPAS, INC. AND IS FURNISHED FOR THE PURPOSES OF REVIEW, BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT LISTED IN THE JOB TITLE BOX ABOVE AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR RELEASED TO ANY OTHER PARTY WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF LPAS, INC. INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF LPAS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED COPYRIGHT © 2009. THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER. ARCHITECT / CONSULTANT APPROVAL Avesta Development Group DUBLIN, CA 7601 AMADOR VALLEY BLVD. DUBLIN, CA 94568 668-0020 Edit the Revision and copy it to the appropriate sheets (Copy up 6") 01.26.2018 1ST PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTAL PARTIAL SITE PLAN A1.01 PARTIAL SITE PLAN H51" = 10'-0" KEYNOTES H1NO SCALENFT 3020010 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" CONCRETE PAVING- NATURAL GRAY W/ LIGHT BROOM FINISH; SCORE AS SHOWN1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 5 11 12 HEAVY REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVING- NATURAL GRAY W/ LIGHT BROOM FINISH; SCORE AS SHOWN ASPHALT PAVING, SEE CIVIL SHEET C3.3 LANDSCAPE AREA, SEE SHEET L1.00 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 (E) FIRE HYDRANT, SEE CIVIL UTILITY SHEET C3.5 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 E EXPANSION JOINT CONSTRUCTION JOINT STRIPING MOVEABLE OUTDOOR LOUNGE FURNITURE, BY OWNER CONTROL JOINT PARKING LOT LIGHT ON 2' CONCRETE BASE, SEE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN, SHEET E3.0.0 TRANSFORMER, SEE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN, SHEET E3.0.0 TABLE AND CHAIRS W/ UMBRELLA, BY OWNER SITE UTILITIES, SEE CIVIL SHEET C3.5 PEDESTRIAN LIGHT, SEE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN, SHEET E3.0.0 18" HIGH POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE SEATWALL BOLLARD LIGHT, SEE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN, SHEET E3.0.0 6' HIGH WOOD FENCE 44 45 46 B1 A1.11 2 C4.0 D1 A1.11 H1 A1.11 D9 A1.11 4" GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE BOLLARD PER PG&E GREENBOOK STDS. F1 A1.12 47 48 49 BIKE RACK, AS AVAILABLE BY MADRAX. MODEL: METRO 2 BIKE RACK, EMBED MOUNT, POWDERCOAT FINISH, COLOR T.B.D. 50 KNOX BOX, FIRE DEPARTMENT TO CONFIRM LOCATION 6' LX42" H SCREEN FENCE, TYPE A REINFORCED STAMPED AND INTEGRALLY COLORED CONCRETE PAVING, PATTERN: RUNNING BOND COLOR: SIERRA 61078 BY DAVIS COLORS CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF DUBLIN STANDARDS, SEE CIVIL SHEET 3.2 FOR MORE INFORMATION (E) STREET TREE, TO PROTECT IN PLACE PLANTER POT, TYPE A BY TOURNESOL SITEWORKS, MODEL: DR481818, T-2 FINISH, COLOR T.B.D. INCLUDE MATCHING IRRIGATION LINER, CWM-R1614-2K (E) PROPERTY LINE WALL TO REMAIN GENERATOR, 112"LX41'WX69" HIGH SEE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN, SHEET E3.0.0 TREE GRATE, 4'X8', BY IRONSMITH, MODEL: MARKET STREET, W/ 18" OPENING NOT USED (E) STREET TREE TO REMAIN NOT USED NOT USED 6' HIGH SCREEN 12'LX42" H SCREEN FENCE, TYPE B (E) ELECTRICAL VAULT TO REMAIN NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED CONCRETE WHEEL STOP NOT USED B1 A1.11 TABLE AND CHAIRS, BY OWNER STORMWATER QUALITY PLANTER, SEE SHEET L1.00 D5 A1.12 F5 A1.12 C1 A1.12 F1 A1.12 NOT USED NOT USED WALK-OFF MAT, PEDISYSTEMS, PEDIGRID G, WITH CARPET INSERTS F3 A1.11 PLANTER POT, TYPE B BY TOURNESOL SITEWORKS, MODEL: DR3600, T-2 FINISH, COLOR T.B.D. INCLUDE MATCHING IRRIGATION LINER, CWM-R2014-2K NOT USED D13 L2.11 SIM. D13 L2.11 D9 A0.30 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT09.27.2017 BUILDING DEPT. SUBMITTAL11.10.2017 1PLAN CHECK 1 RESUBMITTAL01.26.2018 ABID SET REVISIONS01.26.2018 A A A A A A A 1 1 Each Butterfly Screen Section is: 120" Wide x 36" Tall Butterfly 1. 32" x 30" Butterfly 2. 42" x 40" Butterfly 3. 38" x 36" LEVEL 1 0' - 0" LEVEL 213' - 0" LEVEL 324' - 0" LEVEL 434' - 9" ROOF45' - 6" H2 A3.21135 7 9 11 13 152468101214 A8.14 C1 P-2 P-3 ET-1 P-3 P-3 09 05 09 15 09 13 09 06 09 08 09 12 P-2P-3 P-3 P-5 P-3 P-2 P-2 09 06 P-2 P-3 08 0709 08 P-2 P-2 P-3 08 06 P-3 P-3 A8.40 D109 08 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-3 09 09 P-1 P-4 P-3 P-4 P-4 P-3 P-3 P-109 04 09 09 ET-1 P-1 09 08 P-3P-3 09 09 P-3 P-3 P-3P-3 P-3 08 08 08 02 P-1 P-1 P-1 P-1 P-1 P-4 P-3 P-1 09 08 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-4 P-3 P-3 P-1 TYP. P-3 P-3P-1P-3 P-1 P-3 TYP. ET-1 09 08 P-1 P-3P-1 09 03 09 06 P-2 P-3 09 04 P-3 P-3P-3 08 08 P-3P-1 ET-1 P-3 P-1P-3P-5 09 05 P-3 P-2 09 08 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-1 22 02P-3 P-4 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-3 P-1 P-1 P-3 08 08 P-3 P-3 09 08 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-1P-1 P-3 ET-1 P-1 P-3 P-4 09 0309 09 09 09 P-3 P-3 P-5 09 05 P-3 P-3 P-1 P-3 09 08 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-3 09 1509 15 22 02 P-3 P-2 P-3 09 08 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-1 22 02 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-3 08 08 ET-1 09 08 P-1 P-3 08 04 09 09 P-3 P-3 P-2 P-3 ET-1 P-1 P-3 P-3 22 02 09 08 09 09 09 09 08 02 05 01 P-1 P-3P-1 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-5 P-3 P-1 ET-1 P-3 09 08 P-1 P-3 09 09 P-3 P-4 P-1 09 08 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-4 P-4 P-3P-3 P-1 P-3 ET-1 09 09 P-4 P-1 P-3 P-3 09 09 P-3 P-2 09 06 22 02 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-1 22 02 P-1 08 08 09 08 ET-1 P-3 P-1 P-1 P-3 08 04 09 05 P-3 P-4 09 09 P-1 P-3 09 08 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-3 09 09 08 08 ET-1 P-2 P-1 P-3 P-3 P-1P-3 08 04 09 1522 02 P-3 P-3 P-2 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-1 22 02 08 04 09 15 P-1 P-3 P-1 07 07 06 07 11 02 02 07 07 02 02 02 03 02 S-41S-42 S-32 S-31 S-11S-12S-13 07 07 07 11 06 07 07 07 0405 0807 04 07 07 06 11 07 07 07 07 0707 07 0404 07 11 06 07 07 0202 07 07 06 11 0707 0707 07 07 0707 11 06 07 07 0707 07 07 06 11 0707 07 07 1 11 00 08 00 07 A3.32 H1A3.33 H1 A3.34 H1 A3.42 H3 150 3/4"LEVEL 1 0' - 0" LEVEL 213' - 0" LEVEL 324' - 0" LEVEL 434' - 9" ROOF45' - 6" H3 A3.22 CC BB AADDFFGGHHEE 26 03 08 08 09 08 09 09 22 02 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-1 P-1 09 15 09 05 P-5 P-3 P-1 P-3 ET-1 P-3 P-3 09 09 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-3 08 08 ET-1 09 08 P-1 P-5 P-3 P-3 P-1 P-4 P-3 P-1 09 08 09 09 P-1 P-3 P-1 P-4 P-3P-3 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-4 P-1 P-3 ET-1 P-3 P-3 P-5 26 03 P-2 P-3 22 02 09 08 09 08 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-1 P-1 22 02 P-3 P-1 09 06 09 06 P-3 P-1 09 08 ET-1 09 08 P-1 P-2 P-3 P-3 P-2 P-1P-3P-3 ET-1 P-3 P-1 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-5 P-2 09 06 P-3 09 08 P-2 P-3 P-2 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-3 P-2 P-3 P-3 P-2 P-3 P-3 A8.40 D6 P-3 02 02 07 0101 0707 07 07 0702 02 07 0606 07 11 11 07 0707 0707 07 07 04 07 07 07 S-41 S-31 S-11S-12S-13 S-42 S-32 00 07 1 A3.31 H1 A3.41 H13 GENERAL NOTES KEYNOTES EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND & NOTES 1. ALL G.S.M. FLASHING, COPING, DOWNSPOUTS, LOUVERS, WALL CAPS, GUTTERS, SOFFIT VENTS, AND CONDUCTOR HEADS ARE TO BE FIELD PAINTED, U.O.N. THIS APPLIES TO ALL SUCH G.S.M. METAL COMPONENTS, WHETHER EXPOSED TO VIEW OR HIDDEN FROM VIEW. 2. ALL EXTERIOR WALL ACCESSORIES AND ROOF FLASHING ACCESSORIES ARE TO BE G-90 HOT DIP GALVANIZED, U.O.N. 3. ALL STEEL BALCONY RAILS, POSTS, ATTACHMENT BRACKETS, SUPPORTS AND FITTINGS ARE TO BE GALVANIZED AND FIELD PAINTED, U.O.N. 4. PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER SHALL HAVE “INTEGRAL COLOR” AND HAVE AN ACRYLIC FINISH COAT. 5. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, WHERE A WALL, SOFFIT, OR CEILING ELEVATION / VIEW IS NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE CEMENT PLASTER CONTROL JOINTS SO THAT PLASTER AREAS DO NOT EXCEED 144 SF, AND DO NOT EXCEED A LENGTH-TO-WIDTH RATIO OF 2 ½ TO 1. 6. ALL SHEET METAL ROOFS, COPINGS, AND COVERS SHALL RECEIVE 2 LAYERS HIGH-TEMPERATURE RATED, SELF ADHERING FLASHING (BUTYL-BASED SELF ADHERED FLASHING) BELOW SUCH METAL COVERINGS, U.O.N. 7. REFER TO A8.50 FOR TYPICAL EXTERIOR DETAIL CONDITIONS. 8. AT ADHERED PORCELAIN TILE ASSEMBLIES, PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS AT A MAXIMUM OF 8’-0” O.C. VERTICALLY AND HORIZONTALLY, UON. P-1 PAINTED FINISH MFC: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR: SW 6246 NORTH STAR P-2 PAINTED FINISH MFC: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR: SW 7050 USEFUL GRAY P-3 PAINTED FINISH MFC: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR: SW 7073 NETWORK GRAY P-4 PAINTED FINISH MFC: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR: SW 7040 SMOKEHOUSE P-5 PAINTED FINISH MFC: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR: SW 6226 LANGUID BLUE P-6 PAINTED FINISH MFC: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR: SW 7074 SOFTWARE ET-1 EXTERIOR PORCELAIN TILE MFC: EMSER TILECOLOR: SD14 SADDLE BROOK NOTES: 1.GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS: PAINT, COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT PLASTER 2. G.S.M. COPING AND PARAPET CAPS: PAINT, COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT PLASTER 3 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW:TO MATCH OLDCASTLE "PORTLAND STONE" 4. BALCONY RAILINGS: PAINT, COLOR TO MATCH RAL-7047LEVEL 1 0' - 0" LEVEL 213' - 0" LEVEL 324' - 0" LEVEL 434' - 9" ROOF45' - 6" B LEVEL 1 0' - 0" LEVEL 213' - 0" LEVEL 324' - 0" LEVEL 434' - 9" ROOF45' - 6" 202120.4 RENEWALDATE A RCHIT E C TLICEN SE D CA L IF O RNIAS T AT EOF THERESA PAIGEC-25452 SHEET NO: DATE: PROJECT NO: THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION THAT IS PROPRIETARY TO LPAS, INC. AND IS FURNISHED FOR THE PURPOSES OF REVIEW, BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT LISTED IN THE JOB TITLE BOX ABOVE AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR RELEASED TO ANY OTHER PARTY WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF LPAS, INC. INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF LPAS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED COPYRIGHT © 2009. THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER. ARCHITECT / CONSULTANT APPROVAL 6910 5 31112874 2 1 H G F E D C B A B A H G F E D C 6910 5 31314874 2 1 NO. ISSUE DATE 12 11 1314 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 09/27/2017 BUILDING DEPT. SUBMITTAL 11/10/2017 Avesta Development Group DUBLIN, CA 7601 AMADOR VALLEY BLVD.DUBLIN, CA 94568 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.11 01.26.2018 668-0020 1ST PLAN CHECKRESUBMITTAL 1/8" = 1'-0"D4Elevation Amador Valley (South) 1/8" = 1'-0"H5Elevation Donahue (East) 00 07 12" TALL METAL BUILDING ADDRESS NUMERALS 00 08 5" TALL ILLUMINATED BUILDING ADDRESS NUMERALS 05 01 JULIET BALCONY TUBE STEEL RAILING AT 42" 08 02 VINYL WINDOW 08 04 PTAC LOUVER FINISHED TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL 08 06 GLASS GUARDRAIL 08 07 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 08 08 OVERSIZED PTAC LOUVER FINISHED TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL, PROVIDE BLANK OFF PANELS ON THE INSIDE FACE TO REDUCE TO REQUIRED OPENING SIZE 09 03 ONE COAT PLASTER ASSEMBLY OVER 1" THICK RIGID INSULATION 09 04 THINSET TILE OVER ONE COAT PLASTER ASSEMBLY OVER 1" THICK RIGID INSULATION 09 05 6" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING OVER 1/2" FURRINGCHANNELS OVER 1" THICK RIGID INSULATION 09 06 4" FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING OVER 1/2" FURRINGCHANNELS OVER 1" THICK RIGID INSULATION 09 08 WET SEALED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE EYEBROW 09 09 ONE COAT PLASTER ASSEMBLY OVER STYROFOAM TRIM 09 12 9 1/4" WIDTH BY 1" THICK SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT TRIM 09 13 7 1/4" WIDTH BY 1" THICK SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT TRIM 09 15 7/8" CEMENT PLASTER OVER GYP. SHEATHING OVER METAL STUD FURRING 22 02 ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW SCUPPER, TYP. 26 03 WALL MOUNTED EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE 1 PLAN CHECK 1 RESUBMITTAL 01.26.2018 A BID SET REVISIONS 01.26.2018 1/8" = 1'-0"H12Elevation Amador Valley (East) 1/8" = 1'-0"H2Elevation Donahue (South) A A Butterfly 1. 32" x 30" Butterfly 2. 42" x 40" Butterfly 3. 38" x 36" Each Butterfly Screen Section is: 120" Wide x 36" Tall 4.4.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: 1. Avesta Public Art Location (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.b Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: 2. Matthew Placzek Artist Background and Resume (Avesta Public Art) P L A C Z E K S T U D I O S MONUMENTAL SCULPTURES 3716 LEAVENWORTH STREET • OMAHA, NE 68105 • 402-551-1200 • PLACZEKSTUDIOS.COM BIOGRAPHY An artist for more than three decades, Matthew Placzek’s creations range from small pieces to large-scale sculptures that stand 90 feet tall. No matter the size, his work is transformative, moving and unforgettable. Born in 1964 in Columbus, Nebraska, Matthew entered the world of sculpting at age 14, creating figures of wildfowl and nature he observed near the Platte River. Art shows and competitions followed, and as his visibility increased, his unique style was lauded by many in the art world. While attending Hastings College and Creighton University, he was represented by several art galleries around the country. At the age of 22, Matthew was honored by the U.S. Ambassador to Czechoslovakia, who hosted the artist’s one-man show at the American Embassy in Prague. That same year, he had the honor of presenting an original sculpture of an American bald eagle to President Ronald Reagan. Shortly after creating his first large-scale commission in 1991, Matthew found himself catapulted into the world of municipal and private sculptural art projects. Universities, healthcare centers and corporations came calling, and he welcomed the opportunities to transform their open spaces with stunning works of art. Matthew’s fascination with sculptural composition has evolved into an art form that is both meticulous in detail and free-flowing in design. His focus, once on monumental work, now includes large, multi-faceted sculptural installations; his most recent project features eighty bronze sculptures. In many cities, these pieces have become landmarks that have received widespread acclaim in numerous national art and architectural publications. Making a personal connection between his art and the viewer is essential to Matthew. Through his sculptures, he hopes to evoke an emotional reaction – whether reflective or joyful. Each intricately-detailed piece offers an engaging, interactive experience, inviting viewers to walk around it, feel the different textures, and examine how shadows, layers and movement are created. To date, Matthew’s pieces are included in over fifty hospital, university and corporate collections. With exciting projects always in the works, this artist promises many years of adding beauty to the world and dazzling audiences along the way. To learn more about Matthew Placzek and his unique monumental sculptures, please contract him at: Matthew@MatthewPlaczek.com or 402.551.1200. To view more samples of his work, visit: www.PlaczekStudios.com 4.4.b Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: 2. Matthew Placzek Artist Background and Resume (Avesta Public Art) P L A C Z E K S T U D I O S MONUMENTAL SCULPTURES 3716 LEAVENWORTH STREET • OMAHA, NE 68105 • 402-551-1200 • PLACZEKSTUDIOS.COM INSTALLATIONS PUBLIC MONUMENTS “Essence” – 22 foot-tall butterfly spire, Stainless Steel, and Acrylic – The Club at Boynton Beach, Boynton Beach, FL 2019 “Symphony Waterway Butterflies” – 14 foot-tall monarch butterfly spire, Stainless Steel, and Acrylic – The Club at Boynton Beach, Boynton Beach, FL 2019 “River Ridge Butterflies” – 3, 4 foot-wide, 5 foot-wide, 6 foot-wide suspended butterflies, Stainless Steel, and Acrylic – Jefferson Parish Library - River Ridge Library, RiverRidge, LA 2018 “Buffett Cancer Center Benches” – 12 and 16 foor bronze natural wood style benches – The Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center - Omaha, NE 2018 “Pages to Live By” – 45 foot-wide – 10 bronze book pages hung on a wall and 6 free standing pages – Scott Campus at University Nebraska of Omaha, Omaha, NE 2017 “Canyon Reflections” – 45 foot-tall 20 foot-wide – 3 hanging acrylic pieces, 1 hanging piece of aluminum – Kirtland AFB 377th MDG Clinic, Albuquerque, NM 2017 “Polar Bears” – 1.5 time life size – 3 painted Bronze Figures – Omaha Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium, Omaha NE 2017 “Pinwheels” – 16 foot-tall Stainless Steel and Bronze – Dayton Children’s Hospital, Dayton, OH 2017 “Colors of the Prairie” – 28 foot-wide Aluminum and Acrylic with LED lighting – Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, Omaha NE 2017 “Spring Sonata- Iris Garden” – 28 foot-wide Aluminum and Acrylic with LED lighting – Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, Omaha NE 2017 “The Work Continues” – 7 foot-tall Bronze Figure – Boys Town, Omaha NE 2017 “Chukkachvffa” – 12 foot-tall bronze and acrylic medicine wheel, 4 larger than life bronze figures, Acrylic and Bronze – Choctaw Nation Regional Medical Clinic – Durant, Oklahoma 2017 “Dr. Glenn Lewis C.” – 7 foot-tall Bronze Figure – University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE 2017 “Alaskan Adventure” – 18,625 Square-foot Stainless Steel, Bronze, Concrete, Splash Park – Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo, Omaha NE 2016 “Connections” – 16 ft tall by 10 ft wide Stainless Steel Paint, LED Lighting – Bellevue University, Bellevue, NE 2015 “Leaf Arbor” – 18 ft tall by 30 ft wide Stainless Steel and Aluminum – CHI St. Luke’s Health Springwoods Village Hospital, Spring, TX 2015 “Soaring” – 36 ft tall Stainless Steel – Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, San Antonio, TX 2015 “Majestic Flight” – 18 ft tall Stainless Steel and Bronze - Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, San Antonio, TX 2015 “Circling” – 18 ft tall Painted Stainless Steel – Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, San Antonio, TX 2015 “Reflections” Wall Sculpture – 10 ft wide by 6 ft tall – Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort Benning, GA 2014 “Serene” Leaves – 24 ft wide by 16 ft tall – Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort Benning, GA 2014 “Nebraska Secretaries of Agriculture” – 7 ft Bronze Figures – University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 2014 “The Spartan” – 8 ft Bronze – Aurora University, Aurora, IL 2014 “Wolf’s Guenon Primates” – Life-Size Bronze Primates - Henry Doorly Zoo, Omaha, NE 2014 “Te Ata” – Life-size Bronze – 2014 “Synchronicity” – 10 ft Painted Aluminum – Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX 2014 “Cascading Leaves” – 110 ft long by 30 ft wide Painted Aluminum – Methodist Richardson Medical Center, Dallas, TX 2014 “Spirit” – 140 ft long, 40 ft wide, 15 ft high Stainless Steel, Aluminum, Acrylic and LED Lighting – OU Children’s Hospital, Oklahoma City, OK 2014 “Serenity” – 15 ft Bronze and Painted Steel – Alamance Medical Center, Burlington, NC 2014 “Motivation” – 15 ft Acrylic and Stainless Steel – Elkhorn Middle School, Elkhorn, NE 2013 “Bergan Mercy – Water Feature” – 4 ft Bronze cube – Bergan Mercy Medical Center, Omaha, NE 2013 4.4.b Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: 2. Matthew Placzek Artist Background and Resume (Avesta Public Art) P L A C Z E K S T U D I O S MONUMENTAL SCULPTURES 3716 LEAVENWORTH STREET • OMAHA, NE 68105 • 402-551-1200 • PLACZEKSTUDIOS.COM “Harmony Chime” – 14 ft tall Stainless Steel Chime – Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha, NE 2013 “Harmony Screen” – 18 ft long Stainless Steel and Acrylic – Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha, NE 2013 “Reticulated Giraffe” – Life-Size Wood - Henry Doorly Zoo, Omaha, NE 2013 “Chaparral” – 8 ft Bronze – College of DuPage, Glen Ellyn, IL 2013 “Celebration” – 15 ft Bronze and Painted Steel – Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha, NE 2012 “Imagination Takes Flight” – 9 ft Bronze – Council Bluffs Public Library, IA 2012 “Aquatic Rhapsody” – 12 ft Bronze Fountain – Omaha Henry Doorly Zoo, Omaha, NE 2012 “Tranquility” – 14 ft tall Multi-Colored Patina Stainless Steel and Acrylic - 2012 “Transcending” – 9 ft tall Painted Steel and Acrylic - 2012 “Southpaw” – 8 ft Bronze – University of South Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 2012 “Enraptured” Vessel – 7 ft tall Painted Stainless Steel - 2012 “Imagine” – 90 ft Stainless Steel, Bronze, Polycarbonate and LED Lighting – Children’s Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha, NE 2010 “Enrichment Path” – 16 ft Stainless Steel and Acrylic – Metropolitan College, Omaha, NE 2010 “Spellbound” – 12 ft tall Bronze - 2010 “Cherished” – 6 ft tall Bronze - 2010 “Majestic” – 5 ft Bronze – Social Security Administration Building, Roanoke, VI 2009 “Noodles & Doodles” – 20 ft Painted Aluminum– Joslyn Art Museum Sculpture Garden, Omaha, NE 2009 “The Protector” Firefighters Memorial – 8 ft Bronze – Lewis & Clark Landing, Omaha, NE 2009 “Sioux Warrior” – 15 ft Bronze – Joslyn Art Museum Sculpture Garden, Omaha, NE 2008 “Metamorphosis” – 18 ft Steel and Acrylic – Henry Doorly Zoo, Omaha, NE 2008 “Leaves” Water Feature – 15 ft high by 50 ft wide Painted Aluminum – Irvington, NE 2007 “Airborne Monument” - 8 ft Bronze – Heartland of America Park, Omaha, NE 2007 “Illumina” – 35 ft high by 100 ft wide Stainless Steel, Bronze, Aluminum, Acrylic, and LED Lighting – CenturyLink Center Omaha, Omaha, NE 2007 “Unity” – 18 ft Stainless Steel – Department of Homeland Security, Omaha, NE 2006 “Billy Blue Jay” – 6 ft Bronze – Creighton University Soccer Stadium, Omaha, NE 2004 “Time Shadow” – 7 ft Bronze Sundial – Forest Lawn, Omaha, NE 2004 “Labor” - 30 ft high by 40 ft wide Bronze Monument – Omaha Riverfront, Omaha, NE 2003 (This monument is the second largest labor monument in the country.) “Through Currents of Time and Space” – 25 ft Bronze and Stainless Steel – Landmark Center, Omaha, NE 1991 PERMANENT COLLECTIONS Presidential Collection - President Ronald Reagan Presidential Palace - Hofberg, Vienna, Austria U.S. Embassy - Prague, Czechoslovakia Nebraskahaus - Germany Presidential Residence - Taiwan State Capital Building, Lincoln, NE Hastings College Collection Ambassador J.M. Nimczyk, Washington, D.C. US Embassy, Prague UNIVERSITIES AND HOSPITALS Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, Omaha, NEDayon Children’s Hospital, Dayton, OH Choctaw Nation Regional Medical Clinic, Durant, OKLackland Airforce Base Ambulatory Care Center, San Antonio, TXMartin Army Community Hospital, Fort Benning, GAMethodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TXUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NEAurora University, Aurora, ILMethodist Richardson Medical Center, Dallas, TXOU Children’s Hospital, Oklahoma City, OKAlamance Regional Medical Center, Burlington, NCMethodist Medical Center, Dallas, TXBergan Mercy Medical Center, Omaha, NE 4.4.b Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: 2. Matthew Placzek Artist Background and Resume (Avesta Public Art) P L A C Z E K S T U D I O S MONUMENTAL SCULPTURES 3716 LEAVENWORTH STREET • OMAHA, NE 68105 • 402-551-1200 • PLACZEKSTUDIOS.COM Immanuel Medical Center, Omaha, NEParkview Health Center, Fort Wayne, INChildren’s Pediatric Center, Omaha, NEMethodist Medical Center- Richardson, TXUniversity of Nebraska, Lincoln, NEUniversity of South Alabama, Mobile, ALCollege of Dupage, Glen Ellyn, ILAurora University, Chicago, IL Creighton University, Omaha, NE University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE CORPORATE ART COLLECTIONSTakao Building Development, Tokyo, JapanGuinness Brewing, LondonBMW Corporation, GermanyCaterpillar Worldwide, Peoria, IL Dayton Hudson, Minneapolis, MNMartin May Corporation, Beverly Hills, CAOmaha World Herald, Omaha, NEClarkson Hospital, Omaha, NEPeter Kiewit Sons, Omaha, NELevel3 Corporation, Denver, COJoslyn Art Museum, Omaha, NEMeritcare, Pittsburgh, PADupont WorldwideWashington Corporation, MTCJ Cella Thoroughbreds Inc, St. Louis, MOAmerica First Corporation, Omaha, NEGoedel and Co., New York, NYHuntel Communications, Omaha, NE Durham Resources, Omaha, NEStandard Corporation, Omaha, NEBeta West, Omaha, NECreighton University, Omaha, NEHornady Manufacturing Company, Grand Island, NEHenry Doorly Zoo 2001 Bronze MedallionUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE Wayne Newton Collection AWARDS AND EXHIBITS Downtown Omaha Inc. - Cultural Art Award 2009 Midlands Business Journal “40 Under 40” Entrepreneur Award 2003 Gold medal Artist, May Gallery, Scottsdale, AZ 1996 - 2004 One- Man Featured art Show, Naples Fine Art, Naples, FL 1991-1994, 1997, 2001, 2005 Wings Over the Platte Featured Artist 1991 One Man Art Show, Hastings College, 1990 One- Man Retrospective, Stuhr Museum, Grand Island, NE 1990 Best of Show National Wildlife Art Show, 1984, 1985, 1987 One Man Art Exhibit, Nebraska State Capital, 1985 One Man Show – U.S. Embassy, Prague, Czechoslovakia 1982 GALLERY REPRESENTATION Borsheims, Omaha, NE DeBruyne Fine Art, Naples, FL Mainview Gallery, Scottsdale, AZ Mockingbird Gallery, Bend, OR EDUCATION Hastings College, Hastings, NE Creighton University, Omaha, NE REFERENCES MR. MICHAEL YANNEYChairman EmeritusThe Burlington Capital Group LLC One Burlington Place 1004 Farnam St, Suite 400 Omaha, NE 68102800-283-2357402-444-1630 MR. TERRY L. MOOREPresident and CEO of Omaha Federation of Labor6910 Pacific St # 450Omaha, NE 68106402-346-4800 MR. CALVIN R. SISSONExecutive DirectorSuzanne and Walter Scott Foundation11422 Miracle Hills Drive-Suite 408Omaha, NE 68154402-502-1122calvin@swscottfdn.org 4.4.b Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: 2. Matthew Placzek Artist Background and Resume (Avesta Public Art) P L A C Z E K S T U D I O S MONUMENTAL SCULPTURES 3716 LEAVENWORTH STREET • OMAHA, NE 68105 • 402-551-1200 • PLACZEKSTUDIOS.COM ARTIST STATEMENT Around the world, the butterfly is symbolic of representing endurance, change, hope, and life. Which is why I decided to use butterflies as the subject of this sculpture. Each sculpture I create is unique to each location, and becomes a landmark. These colorful and vibrant butterfly sculptures create a joyous atmosphere, promoting positivity and social interaction. The goal for these sculptures is to create a create a joyous atmosphere, promoting positivity and social interaction, for residents and visitors to gather and socialize. Utilizing my 30 years of experience creating monumental sculpture, I use great attention to detail. Each sculpture is created from concept to installation, covering each part of the creative process with the highest industry standards. I work in a wide variety of materials, from bronze to stainless steel, as well as acrylic. Each piece is created unique to each location, and often times becomes a landmark. Backed by a team of professional engineers and installation technicians, I take the time to make sure the process is a seamless experience for each client. Creating a unique piece, custom to each location is my passion. 4.4.c Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: 3. Avesta Public Art Proposal - Artist Statement and Renderings (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.c Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: 3. Avesta Public Art Proposal - Artist Statement and Renderings (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.c Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: 3. Avesta Public Art Proposal - Artist Statement and Renderings (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.c Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: 3. Avesta Public Art Proposal - Artist Statement and Renderings (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.c Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: 3. Avesta Public Art Proposal - Artist Statement and Renderings (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.c Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: 3. Avesta Public Art Proposal - Artist Statement and Renderings (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.d Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: 4. Avesta Public Art Comments (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.d Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: 4. Avesta Public Art Comments (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.d Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: 4. Avesta Public Art Comments (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.d Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: 4. Avesta Public Art Comments (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.d Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: 4. Avesta Public Art Comments (Avesta Public Art) 4.4.d Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 4. Avesta Public Art Comments (Avesta Public Art) ATTACHMENT 1 - 1 - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * APPROVING A PUBLIC ART INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH AVESTA DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC FOR PUBLIC ART AT 7601 AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Avesta Development Group LLC (“Developer”) is building and will operate a Senior Care Facility comprised of apartments, assisted living and memory care units with associated communal eating and living areas at 7601 Amador Valley Boulevard: and WHEREAS, Developer is required under Dublin’s Public Art Ordinance, Municipal Code section 8.58.060(A) to install Council-approved public art with its Senior Care Facility; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2019, City Council approved Developer’s proposed public artwork by artist Matthew Placzek; and WHEREAS, Developer has entered into a contract with artist Matthew Placzek to complete the approved artwork; and WHEREAS, artist Matthew Placzek has completed fabrication of the approved art; and WHEREAS, Developer is installing the completed artwork as required; and WHEREAS, Dublin’s Public Art Ordinance, Municipal Code section 8.58.070(D) requires that developer execute an agreement with the City, prior to occupancy of the first structure in the project, which sets forth the ownership, maintenance responsibilities, and insurance coverage for the public artwork. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does approve A Public Art Installation and Maintenance Agreement with Avesta Development Group LLC For Public Art At 7601 Amador Valley Boulevard, attached hereto as Exhibit A and authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20h day of August 2019. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ________________________________________ 4.4.e Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: 5. Resolution Approving a Public Art Installation and Maintenance Agreement with Avesta Development Group LLC. for Public Art ATTACHMENT 1 - 2 - Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ City Clerk 2842917.1 4.4.e Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 5. Resolution Approving a Public Art Installation and Maintenance Agreement with Avesta Development Group LLC. for Public Art 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 1 PUBLIC ART INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR AVESTA SENIOR CARE FACILITY This PUBLIC ART INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is dated as of ____________ (“Effective Date”), and is entered into between the CITY OF DUBLIN, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and DUBLIN CA REAL ESTATE, LLC (“Owner”). City and Owner may be referred to individually as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.” City and Owner enter into this Agreement with reference to the following recitals of fact (each, a “Recital”): RECITALS A. Owner is the owner of property in the City of Dublin (“City”) generally located on the North side of Amador Valley Boulevard and West of Donohue Dr and known as 7601 Amador Valley Boulevard ((APN): 941-0173-001-09) (“Property”). Owner is currently developing a four-story 66,787 square feet senior care facility in Downtown Dublin, consisting of 35 senior apartments, 13 high-acuity assisted living units, 32 memory care (“Project”). B. On March 22, 2016 the Planning Commission approved SDR Resolution No. 16- 04 Condition of approval number 14 (the “Condition”) requires Owner to acquire and install a public art project in accordance with Chapter 8.58 of the City Municipal Code valued at a minimum of $67,675, to comply with the Project’s public art compliance report submitted by the Owner and on file with the City, and to, prior to first occupancy, (a) secure completion of the public art project in a manner deemed satisfactory to the City and (b) execute an agreement between the City and Owner that sets forth the ownership, maintenance responsibilities and insurance coverage for the public art project. C. Owner entered into a Public Art Agreement with Matthew Placzek, a sole proprietor (“Artist”), on February 11, 2019 (“Artist Agreement”). Under the Artist Agreement, the Artist agreed to design, fabricate and install public art on the Property “Exhibit A”. The Artist Agreement contains maintenance provisions, warranties, standards and releases. D. On July 11, 2019, the Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission reviewed the proposed public art project prepared by the Owner (“Public Art”) and recommended approval of the Public Art to the City Council. The Public Art consists of colorful and vibrant butterfly sculptures made with durable metal and hand etched acrylic. The Public Art will be installed in the locations set forth on “Exhibit B,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. E. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement to memorialize the City’s approval of the Public Art. Further, compliance with this Agreement is intended to fully satisfy the Condition and Owner’s obligation to enter into an agreement setting forth ownership, maintenance responsibilities and insurance coverage for the Public Art. NOW, THEREFORE, FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION AND THE PROMISES AND COVENANTS OF CITY AND OWNER SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, CITY AND OWNER AGREE, AS FOLLOWS: 4.4.f Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 2 TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. PUBLIC ART INSTALLATION, OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE 1.1 Installation and City Manager Determination. Owner shall cause the Public Art to be installed on the Property at the locations set forth on Exhibit B. Within five (5) working days of notice of the installation, the City Manager, or his designee, shall determine if the Public Art has been completed in a satisfactory manner, which determination shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed and shall be made if the Public Art is in compliance with Exhibit C, and if such determination cannot be made, the City Manager shall provide written notice to Name/email specifying the corrective work needed for compliance within this five (5) day time period. In the event that corrective work is required to bring the Public Art into compliance, Owner will notify the City upon completion of the corrective work, and the City Manager will again be permitted five (5) days to inspect the work as provided in this paragraph. If written notice of the City Manager’s approval or corrective work needed is not timely provided to Name/email, the Public Art shall be deemed approved and completed to the City Manager’s satisfaction, and certificates of occupancy shall not be withheld for failure to satisfy the Condition. 1.2 Ownership and Owner’s Maintenance. Following the City’s approval or deemed approval, as set forth in Section 1.1 above, Owner shall accept the Public Art from the Artist. Thereafter, Owner shall own the Public Art and shall maintain the Public Art, at its sole cost and expense, in good repair and condition and in accordance with the general maintenance plan prepared by the Artist under the Artist Agreement. Owner will use reasonable efforts to maintain the Public Art in good repair and condition. If the Public Art suffers deterioration due to any cause other than Owner’s failure to maintain the Art, Owner and City shall meet and confer in good faith to determine whether to replace any portion of the Public Art or translate any component into new media, or whether to restore the Public Art. The anticipated life span of the Public Art varies based on the specific piece of art, as set forth in Exhibit X years from the date of approval or deemed approval by the City, as set forth in Section 1.1 above. After that time, Owner may, in consultation with City, re-evaluate the Public Art to determine if it retains its identity as a work of art and, if not, whether to take appropriate action, including the possibility of destroying the Public Art. In the event that the Owner, in consultation with City, determines that the Public Art does not retain its identity as a work of art and Owner wishes to destroy the Public Art, the Owner must replace the Public Art with art of similar value, adjusted for inflation (“Replacement Art”). Any proposed Replacement Art must be approved by the City prior to the destruction of the Public Art, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. 1.3 City’s Maintenance Option. In the event that Owner fails to maintain the Public Art in accordance with this Agreement, City shall provide written notice of such condition. In the event that Owner fails to cure or commence to cure the condition within thirty (30) days following receipt of such notice, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to perform all acts necessary to cure such condition (or to pursue such other remedy available to the City), 4.4.f Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 3 including without limitation the right to access the Public Art, and to receive from Owner the City’s reasonable out-of-pocket costs for such action. 1.4 Modifications; Relocation. Owner intends to display the Public Art as originally created by Artist at the locations set forth on Exhibit B. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Owner may make minor modifications to the Public Art and/or relocate the Public Art with the consent of the Director of Parks and Community Services, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Visual Barriers. The Parties agree that no structures or visual barriers of any kind that impair or impede the public’s ability to view the Public Art shall be constructed or maintained on or adjacent to the Public Work, nor shall the Parties do anything that shall prevent, impair, or discourage the public’s ability to view the Public Art. 1.5 Insurance. Owner and Artist are required to secure and maintain insurance during the fabrication and installation phases of the Public Art as set forth further in the Artist Agreement. Owner shall provide City with verification of the required insurance under the Artist Agreement. In addition, Owner shall obtain and maintain in effect a combined single limit policy of liability insurance not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) covering the Public Art placed with insurers with a Bests’ rating of no less than A:VII and shall name the City as an additional insured on such policy. An endorsement must state that coverage is primary insurance with respect to the City and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, and that no insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City shall be called upon to contribute to a loss under the coverage. Any failure of Owner to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. Owner shall notify City within 14 days of notification from Owner’s insurer if such coverage is suspended, voided or reduced in coverage or in limits. 1.6 Satisfaction of the Condition. City agrees that compliance with this Agreement shall fully satisfy the Condition. Provided Owner is in substantial compliance with this Agreement and has otherwise fulfilled any non-Public Art-related requirements, the City may not withhold issuance of Project building permits and/or certificates of occupancy, including but not limited to the first certificate of occupancy for the Project, based on the Condition. 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS 2.1 Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and incorporated into this Agreement by reference. 2.2 Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties. 2.2.1 Delivery. Any and all notices submitted by any Party to another Party pursuant to or as required by this Agreement shall be proper if in writing and dispatched by messenger for immediate personal delivery, nationally recognized overnight (one business day) courier (i.e., United Parcel Service, Federal Express, etc.) or by registered or certified United States mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the address of the recipient Party, as designated in this Section. Notices may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as the Parties may from time to time designate by notice in accordance with this Section. Notice shall be deemed received by the addressee, regardless of whether or when any return receipt is 4.4.f Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 4 received by the sender or the date set forth on such return receipt, on the day that it is dispatched by messenger for immediate personal delivery, one business day after delivery to a nationally recognized overnight carrier or two (2) calendar days after it is placed in the United States mail in accordance with this Section 2.2.1. Any attorney representing a Party may give any notice on behalf of such Party. 2.2.2 Addresses. The notice addresses for the Parties, as of the Effective Date, are as follows: To Owner: Dublin CA Real Estate, LLC 1422 Clarkview Road Baltimore, MD 21209 Attn: Mr. Kenneth Assiran Telephone: 410-769-5882 Email: rkoors@capfundinc.com With a copy to: (list development partners) ADG Dublin, LLC 1095 Colby Ave. Menlo Park, CA 94025 Attn: Mohammad Javanbakht Telephone: 925-899-8981 Email: mj@avestadev.com With a copy to: (Owners’ attorney) Barnes Evans & Lohse LLC 102 W. Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 505 Towson, Maryland 21204 Attn: Edward S. (Ted) Evans III Telephone: (410) 937-0396 Email: ted@bel-law.com To City: City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, California 94568 Attn: City Manager Telephone: (925) 833-6650 Email: city.manager@dublin.ca.gov With a copy to: 4.4.f Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 5 Meyers Nave 555 12th Street, Suite 1500 Oakland, CA 94607 Attn: John D. Bakker, Esq. Telephone: (510) 808-2000 Email: jbakker@meyersnave.com 2.3 Relationship of Parties. The Parties each intend and agree that City and Owner are independent contracting entities and do not intend by this Agreement to create any partnership, joint venture, or similar business arrangement, relationship or association between them. 2.4 Legal Actions. Either Party may institute legal action, at law or in equity, to enforce or interpret the rights or obligations of the Parties under this Agreement or recover damages. 2.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties set forth in this Agreement are cumulative and the exercise by a Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by such Party, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or the same rights or remedies for any other default by the other Party or Parties. 2.6 Principles of Interpretation. A word, term or phrase defined in the singular in this Agreement may be used in the plural, and vice versa, all in accordance with ordinary principles of English grammar, which shall govern all language in this Agreement. The words “include” and “including” in this Agreement shall be construed to be followed by the words: “without limitation.” Each collective noun in this Agreement shall be interpreted as if follo wed by the words “(or any part of it),” except where the context clearly requires otherwise. Every reference to any document, including this Agreement, refers to such document, as modified from time to time (excepting any modification that violates this Agreement), and includes all exhibits, schedules, addenda and riders to such document. The word “or” in this Agreement includes the word “and.” Every reference to a law, statute, regulation, order, form or similar governmental requirement refers to each such requirement as amended, modified, renumbered, superseded or succeeded, from time to time. 2.7 Governing Law. The procedural and substantive laws of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement, without application of conflicts or choice of laws principles. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Agreement is entered into, is to be fully performed in and relates to real property located in the County of Alameda, State of California. All legal actions arising from this Agreement shall be filed in the Superior Court of California in and for the County of Alameda or in the United States District Court with jurisdiction in the County. 2.8 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer any rights or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement on any person or entity other than the Parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns, nor is anything 4.4.f Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 6 in this Agreement intended to relieve or discharge any obligation of any third person to any Party or give any third person any right of subrogation or action over or against any Party. 2.9 Time Declared to be of the Essence. As to the performance of any obligation under this Agreement of which time is a component, the performance of such obligation within the time specified is of the essence. 2.10 Legal Costs. In the event that a Party brings an action to enforce this Agreement or otherwise arising out of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action shall be entitled to recover from the other Party its Legal Costs (which shall be defined to include all reasonable costs and expenses such Party incurs in any legal proceeding, or other matter for which such Party is entitled to be reimbursed for its Legal Costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, court costs and expenses and consultant and expert witness fees and expenses). 2.11 Entire Agreement. This Agreement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned in this Agreement or incidental to this Agreement, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the Parties with respect to all or any portion of the Public Art. 2.12 Waivers and Amendments. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement and all amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of the Parties. Failure to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any term, covenant, condition, restriction or agreement contained in this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant, condition, restriction or agreement, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers under this Agreement, at any one time or more times, be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such right or power at any other time or times. 2.13 Assignment. With the City’s written consent, which will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, Owner may assign the rights, interests and obligations of Owner arising under this Agreement to a homeowners’ association formed for the Project or to a successor in interest or assignee of Owner at which point Owner shall have no further liability hereunder. Owner shall notify the City in writing of the assignment at least thirty (30) calendar days following completion of the assignment. 2.14 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of and enforceable by, the respective personal representatives, successors and permitted assigns of the parties hereto. 2.15 Survival of Agreement. All of the provisions of this Agreement shall be applicable to any dispute between the Parties arising from this Agreement, whether prior to or following expiration or termination of this Agreement, until any such dispute is finally and completely resolved between the Parties, either by written settlement, entry of a non-appealable judgment or expiration of all applicable statutory limitations periods and all terms and conditions of this Agreement relating to dispute resolution and limitations on damages or remedies shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. 2.16 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts. All counterparts so executed shall constitute one agreement, binding on all Parties, even though all Parties are not signatory to the same counterpart. The Parties agree to accept signed copies of 4.4.f Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 7 this Agreement transmitted by electronic facsimile copies as original documents. The Parties acknowledge that copies of this Agreement may be transmitted by a Party over the Internet and printed by the recipient and that the printed document may contain different type styles and type sizes, different pagination and different formatting that the original copy of the Agreement in the possession of the Party sending the Agreement. The Parties agree that any such copies of this Agreement shall be accepted by the Parties as true and correct originals of this Agreement so long as the actual text of this Agreement remains the same. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Agreement by and through the signatures of their respective authorized representative(s) as follow: CITY: CITY OF DUBLIN, a California municipal corporation By: Name: Title: City Manager ATTEST: By: Name: Title: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Name: Title: City Attorney OWNER: DUBLIN CA REAL ESTATE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Name: Title: 4.4.f Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 EXHIBIT A 4.4.f Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 4.4.f Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 4.4.f Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 EXHIBIT B 4.4.f Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 4.4.f Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) 5219-116462\1272220.1 9/2/15 4.4.f Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Avesta Installation and Maintenance Agreement (Avesta Public Art) Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Adopt An Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Section 6.76 (Taxicabs) to Comply with State Laws AB 1069 and AB 939 Prepared by: Lauren Quint, Assitant City Attorney EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Assembly Bill 1069 (Chapter 753, Statutes of 2017) and Assembly Bill 939 (Chapter 472, Statutes of 2018) amended the state laws regarding local regulation of t axicabs. The changes are intended to create a level playing field with “for-hire” ridesharing companies. Previously, taxicab operators were subject to the local laws of each city in which they operated, requiring licenses and fees for each jurisdiction wh ere they provided services. AB 1069 allows cities to regulate taxicabs only if the taxicab is operated and substantially located within its jurisdiction. AB 1069 also imposes updated requirements for safety, drug and alcohol testing and increased penaltie s for noncompliance. AB 939 makes technical and clarifying changes to AB 1069. The attached Ordinance conforms the City’s taxicab laws to AB 1069 and AB 939, and makes additional revisions to reflect current City practices. On July 16, 2019, the City council waived the reading and introduced an Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Section 6.76 regarding Taxicabs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading and adopt an Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Section 6.76 regarding Taxicabs. FINANCIAL IMPACT: It is anticipated that the City’s revenue derived from taxicab permitting operations will decline. Revenue from FY 2016/2017 and FY 2017/2018 was insignificant. DESCRIPTION: The State sets minimum regulations for taxicab companies and drivers, wh ich local jurisdictions must adopt into their ordinances. In October 2017, the State of California enacted AB 1069, a bill that redirected regulatory authority for taxicabs from individual cities and towns to counties and regional authorities, establishing a statewide regulatory 4.5 Packet Pg. 68 Page 2 of 3 scheme for driver eligibility and vehicle safety by amending Section 53075.5 of the Government Code, adding sections 53075.51, 53075.52 and 53075.53 of the Government Code, and amending Section 1808.1 of the Vehicle Code. In Septemb er 2018, the State of California enacted AB 939 to clarify portions of AB 1069. These laws took effect on January 1, 2019. Previously, state law required every city or county to adopt a resolution or ordinance regarding taxicab transportation service. Taxicab companies and drivers were subject to the local laws of each city in which they operated, requiring licenses and fees for each jurisdiction where they provided taxicab services. This model created barriers for market entry and made it difficult for taxicab companies to compete with other for-hire modes of transportation. AB 1069 creates a new regional regulatory scheme throughout the state. (Currently, Alameda County does not have an established regional taxicab permitting authority.) In the absence of a regional authority, these new laws will require a taxicab company to obtain a permit only in the jurisdiction(s) in which it is substantially located. A taxicab company is considered substantially located in a city if that company’s primary business address is located within the city, or if the majority of the company’s rides originate within the city. The law will also allow for the assessment of a minimum fine of $5,000 for unpermitted taxicab operations. The attached proposed revisions to Section 6 .76 of the Dublin Municipal Code implement changes required by AB 1069 and AB 939, and make additional changes to reflect current City practices. Key changes include: Adding definitions and modifications to require a taxicab company to only obtain a permit in jurisdictions in which they are “substantially located,” as defined by state law Modernizing communication requirements to allow a driver to use online applications and the Internet to advertise rates and fares Adding additional safeguards to protect the health and safety of the public, including provisions regarding insurance, inspections, revocation or suspension of permits, mandatory drug and alcohol testing of taxicab drivers, and prohibitions on refusal of service for discriminatory purposes Updating the required contents and procedures for permit applications, and the standards and requirements for taximeters Adding administrative fines for operating without a permit or in violation of the City’s regulations On July 16, 2019, the City council waived the reading and introduced an Ordinance Amending Dublin Municipal Code Section 6.76 regarding Taxicabs. The Ordinance is now ready for adoption. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. 4.5 Packet Pg. 69 Page 3 of 3 NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Staff is recommending that the proposed ordinance be found exempt per CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) as this ordinance has no potential for resulting in significant physical change in the environment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs 4.5 Packet Pg. 70 ORDINANCE NO. __ - 19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING SECTION 6.76 OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXICABS The City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1: Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirely and replaced with the following: Chapter 6.76 TAXICABS 6.76.010 Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the words set out in this section shall have the following meanings: “City” shall mean the city of Dublin. “Chief of Police” shall mean the Chief of Police of Dublin or his or her designee. “Company” means a passenger-for-hire business either based in the city or elsewhere whose business activity includes picking up any passengers in the city by on-demand requests, a radio dispatched service, or referral which results in charging the passenger by metered time and/or distance to a destination identified by the hiring passenger for an exclusive ride. Such taxi services are a business that is required to be licensed under this chapter. Taxi services which have picked up passengers outside of the city and delivered the passengers to a location within the city are excluded from the licensing requirements under this chapter. “Exclusive ride” as it is referred to in this section does not preclude a passenger from directing the taxicab driver to pick up additional passengers en-route to a destination and incurring the additional metered time and/or distance that would be required. “Division of Measurement Standards” means the st ate agency charged with and responsible for ensuring the accuracy of commercial weighing and measuring devices. “Driver” means every person in direct and immediate possession of, in charge of, or operating a taxicab. 4.5.a Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An “Owner” means every person, firm, partnership, association or corporation having proprietary use, ownership or control of any taxicab or fleet of taxicabs. “Prearranged trip” means a trip using an online enabled application, dispatch, or Internet web site. A company may provide prearranged trip s anywhere within the county in which it has obtained a permit. “Sole proprietor” means an independent, self -employed driver whose business is substantially located in the city and who obtains a permit from the city without employing additional drivers. “Substantially located” means either the jurisdiction where a company maintains its primary business address, or the jurisdiction where the largest share of prearranged and non - prearranged trips originates, as defined in Government Code Section 53075.5. “Sub stantially located” shall also mean, for companies establishing a new operation after January 1, 2019, the jurisdiction where a company has its primary business address for the first twelve months of operation. A company or driver may be substantially located in more than one jurisdiction. “Taxicab” means and includes all motor vehicles engaged in the business of transporting passengers for hire on the streets of the city, irrespective of whether such operations extend beyond the boundary limits of the city; such vehicles being designed for carrying not more than eight persons, excluding the driver; and not operating on regular schedules and over regularly established routes. Specifically excluded from the definition of “taxicab” are vans or other vehicles providing transportation for the handicapped, operated by nonprofit social service organizations. “Taximeter” means a device attached to or utilized by a taxicab, by means of which device the authorized charge for hire of such vehicle is mechanically calcul ated on the basis of distance traveled, or for waiting time, or a combination of both, which charges shall be indicated upon by means of figures in dollars and cents. 6.76.020 Insurance required. A. It is unlawful for any owner to drive, operate, or cau se or permit to be driven or operated, any taxicab in the city without maintaining ability to respond in damages as required by Section 16500 of the Vehicle Code. B. It is unlawful for an owner or driver to operate a taxicab unless there is in full forc e and effect a commercial automobile insurance policy, executed by an insurance carrier authorized to conduct business in the state of California and with an A.M. Best rating of at least A:VII, 4.5.a Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An whereby the owner and driver of each of the taxicabs operated under the permit are insured against liability for damage to property and for injury to or death of any person as a result of the ownership, operation or other use thereof. The minimum liability limits upon each such vehicle shall not be less than one million dollars combined single limit for bodily injury to or death of any persons and for damages to or destruction of property in any one accident. Such policy of insurance shall contain an endorsement providing that the policy shall not be canceled or materially modified until notice in writing has been given to the city, addressed to the Chief of Police, at least thirty days immediately prior to the time such cancellation becomes effective. Further, such policy of insurance shall name the city, its officers, agents and employees as additional insured by separate endorsement. Any deviations from these requirements must be approved in writing by the city. Additionally, a vehicle owner and driver shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the city, its officers, agents and employees from claims arising from or alleged to arise from the negligence of the vehicle owner or driver. 6.76.030 Taximeter requirements. It is unlawful for any owner or driver to operate any taxicab in the city unless and until such vehicle is equipped with a taximeter. A company may use any device or technology approved by the Division of Measurement Standards to calculate fares, including the use of global positioning system metering, provided that the device or technology complies with Sec tion 12500.5 of the Business and Professions Code and all regulations established pursuant to Section 12107 of the Business and Professions Code. It shall be the duty of every owner operating a taxicab to maintain such taximeter in good serviceable conditi on so that it will at all times correctly indicate the correct charge for the distance traveled and waiting time. Every taximeter shall be equipped so as to register the cost of transportation of passengers in the city, and the taximeter shall be so placed in the taxicab that the reading dial showing the amount to be charged may be readily seen by the passengers in the taxicab. The owner shall cause such taximeter to be inspected annually by the Alameda County Sealer of Weights and Measures, and shall timely submit a report of such inspection to the Chief of Police. The Chief of Police is hereby authorized at his or her instance or upon complaint of any person, to investigate or cause any taximeter to be investigated, and upon discovery of any inaccuracy in such taximeter, to suspend the permit for operation of the taxicab in which it was installed, until the Chief of Police determines such taximeter has been correctly adjusted. 4.5.a Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An 6.76.035 Inspection required. A. Every vehicle operating with a city permit pursuant to this chapter shall be presented by the owner or driver to the Chief of Police for inspection once a year on or before the first day of March to ensure that the vehicle is maintained in a safe operating condition, and in compliance with the Vehicle Code. All vehicles added to the fleet of any permit intended to be operated under the permit shall be brought to the city police department for inspection prior to use in the fleet by the owner or driver. B. It is unlawful for any owner or driver of any taxicab operated in the city to interfere with or prohibit any public safety officer of the city or any person designated by the Chief of Police from at any time inspecting or thoroughly examining any such taxicab or any taximeter used upon any taxicab. 6.76.040 Schedule of rates—Customer receipts. A. Taxicab owners permitted by this chapter shall at all times keep on file with the Chief of Police an up-to-date schedule of rates of fares charged for carrying passengers and it shall be unlawful to charge other than the schedule of rates of fares, surcharges or excess mileage charges filed with the Chief of Police. B. The driver of any taxicab shall give a receipt, upon request of any passenger, for the fare paid by such passenger. 6.76.050 Owner’s identification and rates—Display requirements and Fare Disclosure. A. The company shall notify the passenger of the applicable rate prior to the passenger accepting the ride for walkup rides and street hails. The rate may be provided on the exterior of the vehicle, within an application of a mobile telephone, device, or other Internet -connected device, or it may be clearly visible in either print or electronic form inside the taxicab. B. The company shall disclose fares, fees, or rates to the customer, and may sat isfy this requirement by disclosing fares, fees, or rates on its Internet web site, mobile telephone application, or telephone orders upon request by the customer. 6.76.055 Maintenance of records. Each permit owner shall maintain accurate records relating to the ownership and registration of any of the permit owner’s vehicles which it operates under the permit. If the permit owner adds any vehicles to its operations under the permit other than those which it has listed in its 4.5.a Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An application, pursuant to Section 6.76.070(A)(7), the permit owner shall, prior to placing the vehicle into service in Dublin, inform the Chief of Police in writing of such vehicle’s acquisition or transfer to its operations under the Dublin permit and shall give the date upon which such vehicle will be put into service under the permit, and all other information required under this chapter as well as any other information requested by the Chief of Police related to such vehicle, its ownership, or use in the permit owner’s business operations. The permit owner shall also keep accurate records on any vehicles listed in its application, or later acquired, which it removes from service under the permit, including dates of such removal, disposition of the vehicle and details of any transfer of ownership, together with copies of all documents related to such transfer. Prior to the start of the next calendar year quarter after the removal of a vehicle from service under the permit, the permit owner shall inform the Chief of Police in writing of that fact, and furnish any related information required by the Chief of Police. 6.76.060 Permits—Required. A. It is unlawful for any owner or driver who is substantially located in the city to operate in the city unless the owner thereof applies for, and obtains a permit in writing from the Chief of Police to do so, which permit shall be nonexclusive and shall be applied for, granted, and in effect, all in compliance with the provisions of this chapter. B. All owners and drivers shall collect data to determine in what jurisdictions each owner and driver are substantially located. Beginning January 1, 2019, data for prearranged and non - prearranged trips collected in the previous twelve months shall be provided upon application or date of renewal to the city for any owner or driver that is substantially located in the city. C. Any owner or driver who changes from being substantially located in another jurisdiction to being substantially located in the city shall provide the city with six months' notice prior making that change. D. Any owner or driver who establishes a new taxi operation after January 1, 2019 shall be considered substantially located in the city if the owner or driver maintains its primary business address in Dublin. After the first year of operation, the owner or driver shall submit and the city shall review all data collected in the previous twelve months to determine where the taxicab owner or driver is substantially located. 4.5.a Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An 6.76.070 Owner’s permit—Application. A. The application for such owner’s permit shall be verified under oath by the applicant, and shall set forth: (1) A full identification of the applicant, relevant business information, and all persons to be directly or indirectly interested in the permit, if granted; (2) The residence and business address, including all members of any firm or partnership, or all officers and directors of any corporation applying; (3) The location of the proposed business for which the permit is requested, and the name of the owner and the present use of such premises; (4) The exact nature of the proposed business for which the permit is requested, and the name under which it is to be operated; (5) The past experience of the applicant in the matter to which the requested permit pertains; and the name, address, and past experience of the person to be in charge of the premises or business; (6) Whether or not any prior license or permit to operate a taxicab business has been revoked and if so, the circumstances of such revocation; (7) The number of vehicles proposed to be operated under the permit, and a complete description of the same including the distinguishing color or colors thereof, the model and year, the manufacturer’s name, the license number and the vehicle registration number; the applicant must be the registered owner of at least five taxicabs to be included in the permit at the time of filing of the application and must maintain at least five taxicabs while operating in the city, unless the applicant is a sole proprietor as de fined in this chapter; (8) The make and type of taximeter intended to be installed in each taxicab; (9) A description of the proposed color scheme and insignia or any other distinguishing characteristics to be used to designate the vehicles of the owner; (10) A description of the proposed uniform to be worn by the drivers of applicant’s taxicabs. B. In addition to the items of information required in subsection (A) of this section, the applicant shall, together with the permit application, furnish the following: 4.5.a Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An (1) A statement from a responsible, solvent corporation, authorized to issue public liability and property damage insurance in the state of California, that in the event the application is granted, they will issue a policy of insurance to the applicant in the manner and form required by this chapter; (2) A statement that the applicant is the registered owner of each of the vehicles it proposes to operate; (3) A statement that no taxicab shall be kept garaged, serviced, maintained or repaired on any premises where the zoning ordinance of the city does not permit the same; (4) The city may require evidence of every material statement in the application of the ability of applicant to meet the provisions of this chapter, together with such furthe r information as the city council, or such official of the city to whom the application may be referred, may require; (5) A statement that within the last five years the applicant has not failed to comply with a final court order or administrative action of an investigatory agency finding a violation of applicable federal, state and local wage and hour laws, including, but not limited to, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the California Labor Code, and any local minimum wage ordinance or prevailing wage requirements. For purposes of this subsection, a final court order or administrative action is one as to which there is no pending appeal and the time for filing an appeal has passed. C. Permit fees therefor shall be charged by the Chief of Police in the amount established by resolution of the City Council and shall be non-refundable. 6.76.080 Owner’s permit—Action on application. The Chief of Police shall issue the permit applied for herein if he is satisfied that the requirements of Section 6.76.070 are fully filled; that all persons interested in the operation of the business are of a good moral character; that the equipment to be used is in good mechanical condition and will be operated with due regard for the safety of the public; and that such transporting is necessary to meet the public need. 6.76.085 Owner’s permit—Denial. The Chief of Police may deny a permit to any applicant if it appears to its satisfaction that the applicant has been convicted of a felony or violation of any narcotic law o r of any penal law 4.5.a Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An involving moral turpitude; that the applicant’s proposed color scheme or other insignia will tend to confuse the identification of the vehicles proposed to be operated by such applicant with those of another owner operating in the city; that the applicant has failed to provide the necessary information required in Section 6.76.070 or made a material misstatement or misrepresentation in the application; that the applicant has been in violation of any of the terms of this chapter, or of any other laws or regulations relating to the conduct of a taxicab business; that the applicant has had a taxicab license revoked or suspended in the city or any other jurisdiction within five years prior to the date of the application; that the applicant has previously applied for a taxicab permit in the city and been denied within two years prior to the date of the current application; or that any other reasonable cause exists which, within the Chief of Police’s sound discretion, would render the proposed operations undesirable to the city or pose a public health and safety risk. 6.76.090 Owner’s permit—Revocation or suspension. A. The Chief of Police, or designee, may revoke or suspend the permit granted under this chapter, if any of the following determinat ions are made: (1) If the owner fails to operate taxicabs in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, violates any state law or provisions of this code relating to traffic or use of streets, or violates any narcotic law or any penal law involving m oral turpitude, or is convicted of a felony; (2) If the owner discontinues or suspends service for a period of ten days without first having obtained permission from the Chief of Police; (3) If the owner refuses to accept a request for service anywhere within the corporate limits of the city, having vehicles and drivers available for service; (4) If taxicabs are operated at a rate of fare other than that specified in the permit’s rate schedule then in effect; (5) For any materially false statements in application for the permit or any extensions thereof, or in any information required to be furnished under this chapter, or for the failure to furnish any material or information required to be furnished to city under this chapter; (6) Failure of the owner to pay, when due, any applicable fees imposed by the city; (7) If the applicant has failed to comply with a final court order or administrative action of an investigatory agency finding a violation of applicable federal, state and local wage and 4.5.a Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An hour laws, including, but not limited to, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the California Labor Code, and any local minimum wage ordinance or prevailing wage requirements , or if the applicant has failed to pay any judgment for damages arising from the unlawful or negligent operation of the taxicab for which the permit was issued. For purposes of this subsection, a final court order or administrative action is one as to which there is no pending appeal and the time for filing an appeal has passed. B. The Chief of Police shall initiate revocation or suspension proceedings by giving written notice to the owner that an appeal of the initial decision must be received in writing within fourteen calendar days of being notified of the revocation or suspension. C. Failure to request a hearing within the required time period pursuant to Section 1.04.050 shall be deemed a failure to exhaust administrative remedies. D. Any person whose permit is revoked shall not be eligible to apply for another permit for a period of one year from the date of such revocation. 6.76.095. Owner’s responsibilities for maintenance and compliance with laws. A. It shall be the responsibility of the owner to assure that every taxicab operated under its permit is in safe working order and meets the requirements of the Vehicle Code of the state of California. The interior and exterior of each taxicab shall be clean and well maintained at all times when in operation. B. All accidents, regardless of the jurisdiction of occurrence, arising from or in connection with the operation of taxicabs which result in death or injury to any person, or in damage to any vehicle, or to any property in an amount exceeding the sum of one hundred dollars, shall be reported to the Chief of Police within ten days from the time of occurrence. C. All owners shall ensure all drivers comply with the provisions of this chapter. D. All owners shall comply with all relevant State law provisions regarding the operation of a taxicab, including, but not limited to, Section 53075.5(h) of the California Government Code. 6.76.100 Driver’s permit—Application. A. Applicants for a driver’s permit shall file written applications containing the following information with the Chief of Police : (1) The name and address of the applicant; 4.5.a Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An (2) The name and address of the applicant’s employer; (3) The license number and vehicle identification number of the taxicab to be operated by the applicant; (4) The applicant’s driver’s license number; (5) A statement that the applicant has not been convicted of any crime involving moral turpitude; (6) Such other information as the Chief may require. B. Permit fees therefor shall be charged by the Chief of Police in the amount established by resolution of the City Council and shall be non-refundable. 6.76.110 Driver’s permit—Action on application. A. Upon application for a driver’s permit, and before it shall be issued, the driver, whether the owner or otherwise, must show evidence that he or she has a valid California driver’s license to operate the type of vehicle for which the driver’s permit is sought. Upon satisfying the foregoing requirements, said driver shall be fingerprinted and photographed and his or her record filed in the Police Department. No such driver’s permit shall be granted to any person under the age of eighteen (18) years. B. A driver’s permit may be denied pursuant to the same grounds for suspension or revocation under section 6.76.120 of this chapter. C. No such driver’s permit issued hereunder shall be transferable in any event. 6.76.115 Driver’s permit—Issuance and Termination A. Upon approval of an application for a driver’s permit and upon payment of the fee in an amount to be established by resolution, th e Chief of Police shall issue a non-transferrable permit to the applicant. Such permit shall bear the name and photograph of the applicant, date of expiration of the permit, and the name of the employer for which the driver is authorized to operate a vehicle. The permit holder shall post the permit in the taxicab in view of the passengers therein, during all working hours. The driver’s permit shall become void upon termination of employment. 4.5.a Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An B. Upon the termination of any driver’s employment, the owner by whom such driver has been employed shall immediately give the Chief of Police written notice of such termination, and the reasons therefor, and shall forthwith surrender the driver’s permit to the Chief of Police for cancellation. It is the obligation of t he owner to retrieve the driver’s permit from the terminated driver and to immediately forward the driver’s permit to Chief of Police with the written notice of termination. 6.76.120 Driver’s permit—Revocation or suspension A. Any person issued a driver’s permit who subsequently is convicted of any felony or misdemeanor offense or who ceases to possess a valid state of California driver’s license of the class required by state law for the operation of taxicabs shall immediately so inform his or her employer and the Chief of Police. B. The Chief of Police may deny, revoke or suspend any driver’s permit for repeated violations of this chapter; or if the driver’s state of California Department of Motor Vehicles record includes four or more moving violations within the preceding twelve-month period; or for any felony conviction or misdemeanor conviction of moral turpitude ; or if the Chief of Police determines that the driver is a danger to the public safety ; or upon substantial evidence of facts of either physical or moral deficiencies which would render such person incompetent to operate a taxicab. C. When the Chief of Police intends to revoke or suspend a driver’s permit, he or she shall give the permit holder written notice of intent. The notice shall set fort h the grounds upon which such revocation or suspension is contemplated, and shall inform the permit holder that he or she has ten days from the date of such notice to file a written request for a hearing. The permit may be revoked if a request for a hearing is not received within the ten-day period. If the permit holder files a timely request for hearing, the Chief of Police shall set a time and place for such hearing, and shall consider all relevant evidence and testimony prior to making a decision thereon. The decision of the Chief of Police is final and no appeal may be made therefrom. 6.76.130 Permit renewal. The holder of every owner’s permit and every driver’s permit shall renew such permits annually by application to the Chief of Police and payment o f such renewal fees as may be established by resolution of the City Council. The permit shall be renewed if the applicant meets all the conditions herein for issuance of a permit. Applications for permit renewals must be received by 4.5.a Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An the Chief of Police no later than thirty days before the date of expiration, and the city council may establish late fees for failure to timely submit renewal applications . 6.76.135 Refusal of service. It is unlawful for any driver to refuse, when the vehicle is in service and not otherwise engaged, to transport any person who requests such service in a sober and orderly manner and for a lawful purpose. Taxicab companies shall not prejudice, disadvantage, or require different rates or provide different service to a person because of race, national origin, religion, color, ancestry, physical disability, medical condition, occupation, marital status, or any characteristic listed or defined in Section 11135 of the Government Code. 6.76.140 Testing of taxicab drivers for controlled substances and alcohol. A. Each owner of a taxicab permit or holder of a taxicab driver’s permit shall maintain a mandatory controlled substance and alcohol testing certification program conforming to Part 40 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations and California Government Code Section 53075.5 for all drivers of vehicles operated under the permit. The program shall contain requirements for rehabilitation, return-to-duty, follow up testing and other requirements conforming substantially to Part 382 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. No taxicab owner’s permit or taxicab driver’s permit shall be issued or renewed unless proof of this mandatory program is submitted to the Chief of Police. B. No taxicab owner’s permit shall be issued or renewed unless the holder at the time of issuance or renewal files with the Chief of Police a certification that each driver of vehicles operated under the permit has tested negatively for controlled substances under a mandatory controlled substance testing certification program conforming to Part 40 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations and California Government Code Section 53075.5. C. No taxicab driver’s permit shall be issued or renewed unless the applicant and the permit owner for which the driver is authorized to operate a vehicle both certify that the driver has tested negatively for controlled substances under a mandatory controlled substance and alcohol testing certification program conforming to Part 40 Code of Federal Regulations and California Government Code Section 53075.5. Upon the request of a driver applying for a permit, the city shall provide the driver a list of the consortia certified pursuant to P art 382 (commencing with Section 382.101) of Title 49 of Federal Regulations that offer tests in or near the city . 4.5.a Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An 6.76.150 Administrative fines. The city may impose an administrative fine against any person, firm or corporation that is found to have operated a taxicab in the city without a valid permit pursuant to this chapter. The minimum fine for operating without a permit in violation of this chapter shall be five thousand dollars ($5,000). The city may also impose administrative fines for all other violations pursuant to code section 1.04.030. 6.76.160 Appeal to City Council. If the applicant or permittee is dissatisfied with the action of the Chief of Police in refusing, suspending or revoking the permits provided for herein, such person may appeal to the City Council from such action by the Chief of Police as provided in Section 1.04.050. Section 2: California Environmental Quality Act. This Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) per CEQA Guidelines Section 150 61(b)(3) since it has no potential for resulting in significant physical change in the environment, directly or ultimately. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if any provision, clause, sentence, word or part thereof is held illegal, invalid, unconstitutional, or inapplicable to any person or circumstances, such illegality, invalidity, unconstitutionality, or inapplicability shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, clauses, sentences, sections, wo rds or parts thereof of the ordinance or their applicability to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days following its adoption. Section 5. Posting. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of August, 2019 AYES: 4.5.a Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk 3233609.3 4.5.a Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: 1. An Ordinance of the City of Dublin Amending Section 6.76 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Taxicabs (Adopt An Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Acceptance of Office of Traffic Safety Grant for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Prepared by: Nate Schmidt, Captain Dublin Police Services EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider confirming its participation in and accepting a traffic safety grant for Dublin Police Services from the Office of Traffic Safety - Selective Traffic Enforcement Program. This grant program supports best practices and strategies to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary collision factors. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Confirming City of Dublin Participation in the State of California Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Grant Agreement. FINANCIAL IMPACT: New grant funds awarded after the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019 -20 Budget are detailed in the table below. The eligible expenses are limited to reimbursement of Police Services’ overtime costs which are associated with grant program activities; the City will absorb all Sheriff’s Department indirect charges and other administrative costs in the current year budget. There is no matching fund requirement and no financial impact to the General Fund. FISCAL YEAR Expenditure Period Grant Revenue 2019-20 (10/01/2019 - 06/30/2020) $35,000 2020-21 (07/01/2020 - 09/30/2020) $15,000 TOTAL GRANT AWARD: $50,000 4.6 Packet Pg. 85 Page 2 of 3 DESCRIPTION: The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) is awarding grant funds for its Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP), using best practice strategies shown to reduce traffic collisions and gain favorable media cove rage. OTS funding is based on the federal fiscal year beginning October 1, 2019. Dublin Police Services has been awarded and has administered similar grants in the past. California OTS recently awarded Dublin Police Services $50,000 to cover overtime co sts, supplies and training. All special traffic enforcement events will fall under the STEP grant. Dublin Police Services will use STEP grant funds to reimburse overtime expended strategies such as DUI saturation patrols. This program will also develop a “Hot Sheet” program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with suspended or revoked licenses as a result of DUI convictions. There will also be DUI checkpoint operations, patrols focused on distracted driving enforcement, nighttime seatbelt/child restraint seat violations and traffic safety education operations. Each of these traffic operations will be conducted to make the streets of Dublin safer for all pedestrians and motorists. The STEP grant will seek voluntary compliance of traffic laws by generating publicity throughout the one-year grant period. OTS will cover all costs associated with the overtime for enforcement programs for the full grant period. After conducting an evaluation of avai lable resources and developing a deployment strategy during this period, Dublin Police Services requested and was awarded funding for two DUI checkpoints, 10 DUI saturation patrols, eight Traffic Enforcement operations, including but not limited to, primar y collision factor violations, four Distracted Driving enforcement operations targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting and three Traffic Safety educational presentations with an effort to reach community members. OTS will cover the costs of supplies to conduct two DUI checkpoints as well as additional schooling for one officer to train them in Field Sobriety testing and advanced roadside impaired driving enforcement training. Overtime funding will include supervisor, officer and clerical positions. Staffing varies depending on the enforcement detail being worked. There is no matching fund requirement for this grant. See Exhibit “A” for goals and objectives and budget sections of the Grant Agreement describing agreement of allotted funds. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. 4.6 Packet Pg. 86 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Confirming City of Dublin Participation in the State of California Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement Agreement 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement 4.6 Packet Pg. 87 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. xx - 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * CONFIRMING CITY OF DUBLIN PARTICIPATION IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, injuries and fatalities resulting from traffic collisions are frequently caused by preventable factors such as driver impairment; and WHEREAS, On July 25, 2019, a Grant Agreement with the State of California Office of Traffic Safety was signed to conduct a multi-year Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP); and WHEREAS, the City was advised after the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Budget of the award of $50,000 to be made under the STEP Grant; and WHEREAS, the total award for the STEP Grant will span Fiscal Years 2019-20 and 2020-21 as described in the Staff Report presented to the City Council on August 20, 2019; and WHEREAS, the enforcement grant is dedicated to reducing the number of fatal and injury traffic collisions by funding supplemental satur ation patrols as well as providing for additional public safety awareness activities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin has agreed DUI enforcement , distracted driving enforcement, seat belt enforcement, and awareness are important elements in improving overall public safety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin confirms the Grant Agreement with the State of California Office of Traffic Safety attached hereto as Exhibit A and executed on July 25, 2019. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council accepts the grant award of $50,000. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2019, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ City Clerk 4.6.a Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: 1. Resolution Confirming City of Dublin Participation in the State of California Office of Traffic Safety Selective Traffic Enforcement 4.6.bPacket Pg. 89Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 90Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 91Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 92Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 93Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 94Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 95Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 96Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 97Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 98Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 99Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 100Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) 4.6.bPacket Pg. 101Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution: OTS STEP Grant Agreement (Acceptance of OTS Grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program) Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Authorize the Purchase of Concession Products from US Foods, Inc. Prepared by: Bridget Amaya, Assistant Parks and Community Services Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider authorizing the purchase of concession products for The Wave from US Foods, Inc. Staff desires to purchase concession items such as produce, beverages, and meats. US Foods, Inc. was selected because of the Government Premier Pricing Index, which is a multi-government competitive bidding process securing the best possible prices. The goods and products cost will exceed $45,000, which requires City Council approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Authorizing Purchase of Concession Products for The Wave from US Foods, Inc. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds have been allocated in the Fiscal Year 2019-20 operating budget for year one of this two-year purchase order and will be included in next year’s budget process. The two-year not-to-exceed purchase amount totals $70,000. DESCRIPTION: The Municipal Code requires purchases of general services, supplies, or equipment in excess of $45,000, be subject to competitive bidding. However, the Municipal Code allows City Council to make an exception “When another public agency has administered a competitive bidding process and has a current valid agreement for the same or substantially similar supplies.” Municipal Code Section 2.36.100(B)(9). US Foods was selected because of its affiliation with the Government Premier Pricing Index, which is a multi-government competitive bidding process securing the best possible prices for the purchase of concession items such as produce, beverages, dairy, janitorial supplies, dry grocery and meats. 4.7 Packet Pg. 102 Page 2 of 2 US Foods is a leading foodservice distributor, partnering with approximately 250,000 restaurants and foodservice operators, that provides customers with a broad and innovative food offering and a comprehensive suite of e -commerce, technology and business solutions. They also operate 14 food processing facilities and have previously provided exceptional service and speedy deliveries to The Wave Waterpark. Staff recommends City Council authorize the purchase of concession products from US Foods for The Wave. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Authorizing Purchase of Concession Products for The Wave from US Foods, Inc. 4.7 Packet Pg. 103 RESOLUTION NO. - 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF CONCESSION PRODUCTS FOR THE WAVE FROM US FOODS, INC. WHEREAS, the purchase of concession items such as produce, beverages, dairy, janitorial supplies, dry grocery and meats is necessary in order to effectively operate the concession stand at The Wave; and WHEREAS, US Foods, Inc. is the leading foodservice distributor, partnering with approximately 250,000 restaurants and operating multiple food processing facilities; and has previously provided exceptional service and speedy deliveries to The Wave; and WHEREAS, Staff has selected US Foods, Inc. because of the Government Premier Pricing Index, which is a multi-government competitive bidding process securing the best possible prices, as per the City of Dublin’s Municipal Code Section 2.36.100; and WHEREAS, the vendor will be compensated for the purchase of goods utilizing the operating budget for Fiscal Year 2019-20 and will be included in the budget process for Fiscal Year 2020-21, for a not-to-exceed amount of $70,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the purchase of concession products for The Wave (including goods, such as produce, beverages, dairy, janitorial supplies, dry grocery and meats) from US Foods, Inc. for a not-to-exceed amount of $70,000, using available budgeted funds. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute purchase agreements with US Foods, Inc., as long as the purchase amount individually or collectively is within the not-to-exceed amount and take any other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the intent of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2019, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _____________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ 4.7.a Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: 1. Resolution Authorizing Purchase of Concession Products for The Wave from US Foods, Inc. (Purchase of Concession Products City Clerk 4.7.a Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: 1. Resolution Authorizing Purchase of Concession Products for The Wave from US Foods, Inc. (Purchase of Concession Products Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: City Manager’s Employment Agreement Prepared by: Agency Negotiating Team (City Councilmembers Arun Goel and Jean Josey) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider the Fifth Amendment to City Manager’s Employment Agreement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the Fifth Amendment to City Manager’s Employment Agreement and Adopt the Resolution Amending Salary Plan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Sufficient funding is available in the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Budget. DESCRIPTION: On March 19, 2019, the City Council appointed an Agency Negotiating Team, consisting of Councilmembers Arun Goel and Jean Josey to meet with the City Manager to discuss terms and conditions of employment. Since that time, the Committee has discussed with the City Manager terms and conditions of employment. As a result of those discussions, the City’s Agency Negotiating Team is recommending that the City Council approve an employment agreement with the City Manager that is the same as the current agreement with the exception of the following provisions: 1. Increase the City Manager’s base salary from $25,261 per month to $25,514 per month; The revision in base pay would be effective May 1, 2019; 2. Lump Sum General Leave Advance of 70 hours; 3. Increasing the General Leave Cap from 600 to 700 hours. Salary Plan Amendment Included in the City’s personnel system are Resolutions that address salary ranges for full-time and part-time personnel. The attached Resolution (Attachment 3) is a proposed amendment to the City’s Salary Plan for full-time personnel which would establish a flat 4.8 Packet Pg. 106 Page 2 of 2 monthly salary for the position of City Manager effective May 1, 2019, in conformity with the proposed contract amendment. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fifth Amendment to City Manager's Employment Agreem ent 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) 3. Resolution Amending Salary Plan 4.8 Packet Pg. 107 ATTACHMENT 1 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF DUBLIN AND CHRISTOPHER L. FOSS FOR EMPLOYMENT AS CITY MANAGER This FIFTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into this 1st day of May, 2019, by and between the CITY OF DUBLIN, a Municipal Corporation, and hereinafter referred to as the “CITY”, and CHRISTOPHER L. FOSS, hereinafter referred to as “CITY MANAGER”. Recitals A. CITY and CITY MANAGER are parties to an Employment Agreement, dated February 18, 2014, as amended on June 2, 2015, August 16, 2016, September 5, 2017, and November 20, 2018 (the “AGREEMENT”). B. Following the 2019 Annual Performance Evaluation of CITY MANAGER, the parties desire to amend the AGREEMENT to increase the City Manager’s base salary by one percent (1%). C. The parties also wish to adjust the CITY MANAGER’S leave allowance. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and covenants herein contained, the parties agree to amend The Agreement as follows: 1. Section III.A.1. (a) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: “(a) Commencing on May 1, 2019 the salary for the position of City Manager shall be $25,514 per month. The City agrees to reevaluate the salary following the performance evaluation described in Section II.D.2 (a) above.” 2. Section III.B.2 (a) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: “(a) City Manager shall receive thirty-eight (38) days of general leave on May 1, 2017 and each May 1 thereafter so long as the Agreement remains in effect. Such leave shall be subject to the same rules applicable to the miscellaneous general City employees, except that City Manager maximum general leave accrual limit shall be seven-hundred (700) hours. Annually on April 26 each year, City Manager may elect to be compensated for any unused general leave granted the previous year not to exceed 184 hours.” 4.8.a Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: 1. Fifth Amendment to City Manager's Employment Agreement (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment Agreement) ATTACHMENT 1 3. Section III.B.2 (d) of the Agreement is added to read as follows: “(d) One-Time Grant of Leave “City Manager shall receive seventy (70) hours of general leave on May 1, 2019.” 4. Except as amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, as amended. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT in duplicate at Dublin, California, the day and year first above written. CITY OF DUBLIN By: _________________________ _________________________ Mayor David Haubert Christopher L. Foss ATTEST: ______________________________ Caroline Soto, City Clerk 4.8.a Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: 1. Fifth Amendment to City Manager's Employment Agreement (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment Agreement) 4.8.b Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment 4.8.b Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: 2. City Manager's Employment Agreement (including previous Amendments) (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. -19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * AMENDING THE SALARY PLAN WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Personnel System Rules, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 86-01 and subsequent Resolutions which comprise the Salary Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the position of City Manager shall be covered under Article I, Section A of the Plan: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said position shall be paid a flat monthly rate within the salary plan as follows: City Manager (Contract): $25,514 (flat rate) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this document shall become a part of the official Salary Plan for the City of Dublin; and that the changes contained herein shall be effective May 1, 2019. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2019. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ City Clerk 4.8.c Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: 3. Resolution Amending Salary Plan (Amendment to City Manager’s Employment Agreement) Page 1 of 4 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 to the Dublin Municipal Code to Ban Expanded Polystyrene for Use as Disposable Food Serviceware Prepared by: Shannan Young, Environmental Coordinator EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider introducing an ordinance adding Chapter 5.34 to the Dublin Municipal Code to ban expanded polystyrene for use as dispo sable food serviceware in the City of Dublin. The Ordinance will also mandate that food vendors and city facility users use only readily recyclable or compostable disposable food serviceware for prepared food. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading and INTRODUCE an Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to Title 5 (Public Welfare) to the Dublin Municipal Code. FINANCIAL IMPACT: If City Council decides to move forward with the citywide ban of expanded polystyrene for use as disposable food serviceware, Staff time will be required to conduct outreach and support to food vendors and city facility users during the initial implementation phase of the ban. The current budget would support these efforts. Subsequently, minimal additional Staff time will be required to enforce the ban. Enforcement on food vendors could be completed as part of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit business inspection program for which fee recovery is included in the Master Fee Schedule. There will be no impact to the General Fund. DESCRIPTION: Expanded polystyrene (EPS), commonly known as Styrofoam, is a thermoplastic petrochemical material utilizing the styrene monomer, marked with recycling symbol No. 6. Despite being marked with the recyclin g symbol, there is no easy or economical way to recycle EPS and it is a durable material that does not degrade in the environment. It breaks easily into tiny pieces, making it difficult to clean up. Wildlife commonly mistakes the fragments of EPS for food and eats it, causing sickness or death. The tiny pieces are windblown into storm drains and local creeks where they are difficult to manage. 4.9 Packet Pg. 130 Page 2 of 4 Litter in our local creeks is a significant environmental issue. In 2009, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) required all cities and agencies under the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP), including the City of Dublin, to develop litter reduction plans and take actions to reduce litter from the storm drainage conveyance. The Water Board recognized litter source reduction as an important step towards managing litter and allows a trash load reduction credit for cities that ban EPS. On April 2, 2019, Staff gave a report to the City Council on a potential citywide ban of EPS for use as disposable food serviceware (Attachment 1). The potential citywide ban would prohibit food vendors and city facility users from providing prepared food in single-use disposable cups, plates, bowls, hinged/lidded containers, or other container, made from EPS. Food vendors and city facility users would instead be required to provide prepared food in compostable, reusable, or recyclable food serviceware. After receiving the report, City Council directed Staff to bring a proposed ordinance back to the City Council for consideration after conducting research on: 1) options for buying back existing EPS stock rather than allowing for a phase-out period; 2) alternative products to EPS that are readily compostable or recyclable; 3) options f or creating a grant program to help businesses with the transition; and 4) reach out to the Chamber of Commerce and restaurants in Dublin to notify them of the potential ban and get feedback to facilitate implementation. Potential Buy-back Opportunities Options for buying back existing EPS stock to keep it out of the environment rather than allowing for a phase-out period are limited. Staff reviewed potential recycling locations, (based on feedback from StopWaste) and discovered that the Newby Island Resource Recovery Park in Milpitas accepts clean EPS food serviceware containers at the following rates: $275/ cubic yard for quantities less than 10 cubic yards; $385/ cubic yard for quantities between 10 -20 cubic yards; and $500/ cubic yard for quantities greater than 20 cubic yards. Newby Island compresses the EPS into bricks which are sold to EPS manufacturers. Although it is possible to recycle existing EPS food serviceware stock, Staff does not recommend a buy-back program for logistical and practical reasons. Considerable space would need to be set aside to collect and store the EPS stock over the course of the buy-back period and restaurants need time to determine which readily recyclable or compostable products will replace the disposable EPS food serviceware. In addition, without conducting an analysis of the existing EPS stock on -hand at restaurants and other food vendors in Dublin, it is impossible to know how much the buy-back program would cost the City. If the existing EPS stock were do nated to homeless shelters, the product may end up in the environment once used. For these reasons, Staff does not recommend an EPS buy-back program. Alternative EPS Products Staff worked with the City’s franchised waste hauler, Amador Valley Industries (AVI), to determine which products are readily compostable or recyclable. AVI contacted the composting facility that manages the compostable waste from Dublin and the feedback 4.9 Packet Pg. 131 Page 3 of 4 received is that only fiber products are compostable; rigid compostable plastic food serviceware and fiber food serviceware that is lined with plastic does not decompose in the industrial composting facility under the normal operating time frames of three - to six- months. Also, these products mimic recyclable plastics at the material s recovery facility and contaminate the plastics recycling process. Therefore, based on processes currently available, only products primarily made from natural fibers are readily compostable. Examples of such products include paper, cardboard, wood, bam boo, sugarcane, or wheat stalks. Products that are currently readily recyclable include polyethylene terephthalate (PETE) plastic products (plastic products labeled #1) and aluminum foil and aluminum pans. A vendor list for recyclable and compostable food serviceware is provided in Attachment 2. Potential Grant Program To facilitate the transition from EPS to readily compostable or recyclable food serviceware, the City could offer mini-grants to food vendors to offset the increased cost of purchasing the food serviceware. Staff recommends that if City Council desires to have a mini-grant program that it be administered on a first come, first served basis until funds are exhausted. The mini-grant program could be funded with Measure D funds. Measure D is a voter approved initiative that established the Alameda County Source Reduction and Recycling Board. The funds are generated by tipping fees at the Altamont Landfill and disbursed to cities in Alameda County based on population. Funds can be used to enhance or advance waste prevention/reduction, reuse, recycling and composting. If a mini-grant program were offered, Staff recommends a total of $10,000 be allocated to the program for distribution to food vendors. Outreach to Food Vendors Subsequent to the report given to City Council on April 2, 2019, a letter was sent to all restaurants in Dublin (Attachment 3) notifying owners/operators of the proposed ban. The Public Works Department received one call in response to the letter. The one food vendor that contacted City Staff did not support the ban. This food vendor was not one of the four food vendors surveyed in 2016 that opposed the ban. Outreach to the Chamber of Commerce Staff also reached out to the Chamber of Commerce about the ban. The main concern expressed by the Chamber is that food vendors have enough time to make the transition to EPS alternative products. The Chamber indicated that restaurants generally have approximately 30 to 90 days of stock on -hand and that it takes time for food vendors to determine which packaging will work for their food products. The Chamber referred Staff to a disposable food serviceware distributor that has many food vendor accounts in Alameda County for a recommendation on an appropriate phase out time period. The food serviceware distributor believes that six months is a reasonable phase-out time period. A six months phase -out is the time period that municipalities have generally used when adopting EPS bans. Conclusion Alternative food serviceware has become more affordable and a wider variety of EPS alternatives are available due to the existing EPS bans in place in Alameda County and throughout California. Implementing the disposable food serviceware ordinance would 4.9 Packet Pg. 132 Page 4 of 4 provide effective litter source reduction and Dublin would receive an additional 3% trash load reduction credit under the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit. Adopting an EPS ban and Disposable Food Serviceware Ordinance (Attachment 4) would be a significant step in waste reduction in Dublin and would further Dublin’s environmental policies and goals. Implementation and Grace Period The proposed ordinance, if approved by City Council, would go into effect 30 days after ordinance adoption. Food vendors and city facility users would have six months (180 days) form ordinance adoption to comply with the ordinance. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: Food vendors in Dublin have been notified that the disposable food serviceware Ordinance is on the City Council agenda. If City Council decides to add a new chapter to the municipal code to ban EPS, Staff will provide at least three notifications to food vendors and known city facility users regarding the EPS ban. Noticing would occur at the ordinance effective date, within three-months of the effective date, and prior to initiation of the enforcement period. Staff will also work with AVI and the Chamber of Commerce to distribute outreach information. ATTACHMENTS: 1. April 2, 2019 Staff Report on Potential Citywide Ban of Expanded Polystyrene 2. List of Readily Compostable or Recyclable Food Serviceware Vendors 3. Letter to Restaurants 4. Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to the Dublin Municipal Code 4.9 Packet Pg. 133 Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: April 2, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Potential Citywide Ban of Expanded Polystyrene for Use as Disposable Food Serviceware Prepared by: Shannan Young, Environmental Coordinator EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: At the February 19, 2019 meeting, the City Council requested that Staff provide a report regarding a potential citywide ban of expanded polystyrene for use as disposable food serviceware. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report, discuss and provide further direction. FINANCIAL IMPACT: If City Council decides to move forward with a citywide ban of expanded polystyrene for use as disposable food serviceware, Staff time will be required to conduct outreach and support to food vendors during the initial implementation phase of the ban. The current budget would support these efforts. Subsequently, minimal additional Staff time will be required to enforce the ban. The enforcement efforts could be completed as part of the Municipal Regional NPDES Stormwater Permit business inspection program for which fee recovery is included in the Master Fee Schedule. DESCRIPTION: In response to direction from City Council at the February 19, 2019 meeting, this report on a potential citywide ban of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) for use as disposable food serviceware has been prepared. If an EPS ban were approved, food vendors would be prohibited from providing prepared food in single-use disposable cups, plates, bowls, hinged/lidded containers, or other container, made from EPS. Food vendors would instead be required to provide prepared food in compostable, reusable, or recyclable food serviceware. EPS, commonly known as Styrofoam, is a thermoplastic petrochemical material utilizing the styrene monomer, marked with recycling symbol No. 6. Despite being marked with 4.9.a Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: 1. April 2, 2019 Staff Report on Potential Citywide Ban of Expanded Polystyrene (Disposable Food Serviceware Ordinance) Page 2 of 3 the recycling symbol, there is no easy or economical way to recycle EPS and it is a durable material that does not degrade in the environment. It breaks easily into tiny pieces, making it difficult to clean up. Wildlife commonly mistakes the fragments of EPS for food and eats it, causing sickness or death. The tiny pieces are windblown into storm drains and local creeks where they are difficult to manage. Litter in our local creeks is a significant environmental issue. In 2009, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) required all cities and agencies under the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP), including the City of Dublin, to develop litter reduction plans and take actions to reduce litter from the storm drainage conveyance. The Water Board recognizes litter source reduction as an important step towards managing litter and allows a trash load reduction credit for cities that ban EPS. On September 21, 2010, the City Council approved Resolution 142 -10, establishing a policy that bans the City’s purchase of plastic bottles and Styrofoam products at City sponsored activities. The City Council acknowledged in its Resolution that at the time, polystyrene was the most abundant type of non-cigarette litter and banning use of polystyrene at City-sponsored events would help the City achieve its goal to divert 75% of waste from landfill. Banning EPS for use as disposable food serviceware would also continue to support current Climate Action Plan (CAP) and waste reduction goals. CAP Measure A.3.2, Citywide Diversion Goal of 75%, and CAP Measure A.3.4, Commercial Recycling Program, remain relevant and are supported by the services offered by Dublin’s franchised waste hauler, Amador Valley Industries (AVI). In addition to supporting these goals, Dublin receives a 1% trash load reduction credit towards meeting the MRP mandate to reduce trash loads in creeks by 80% by July 1, 2019 through the adoption and implementation of Resolution 142-10. Cities in Alameda County began banning EPS as early as 1990 (Berkeley) and many more communities initiated bans in the 2000s. According to Californians Against Waste, 120 California cities and counties have now adopted EPS bans, including all cities in Alameda County except Dublin and Newark. In Alameda County, enforcement is done on a complaint basis and/or through regular stormwater business inspections that are completed as part of requirements under the MRP. When initially implementing a ban, communities generally give a grace period so that restaurants can use existing stock. Additionally, hardship exemptions are included in such bans. Outreach is provided to businesses to help with the transition. In 2016, as part of the outreach effort conducted prior to the adoption of the Alameda County Waste Management Authority’s Expanded Reusable Bag Ordinance, Dublin restaurants were visited and surveyed to determine use of single-use plastic bags. During the site visits, restaurants were also asked about EPS use. As seen in the table below, there were approximately 120 restaurants in operation in Dublin in 2016, 46 of which used EPS. The remaining restaurants had either never used EPS or had already made the switch to non-EPS products. Staff also requested that restaurant proprietors complete a short survey during the visit. Twenty-four restaurant proprietors participated in the survey. Of those participating, 14 were using EPS products; all but four of the proprietors who completed the survey supported an EPS ban. 4.9.a Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: 1. April 2, 2019 Staff Report on Potential Citywide Ban of Expanded Polystyrene (Disposable Food Serviceware Ordinance) Page 3 of 3 2016 Restaurant Site Visits Use EPS 46 37% Do not use EPS 78 63% 2016 Expanded Polystyrene Use Short Survey Results Use EPS & support ban 10 41.6% Use EPS & do not support ban 4 16.6% Do not use EPS & support ban 10 41.6% Alternative food serviceware has become more affordable as more cities have adopted EPS bans. The variety of options for alternative food serviceware has also increased, allowing for easier implementation by restaurants and other food vendors. Food vendors may either provide reusable, compostable, or recyclable food serviceware which can be disposed of at a lower rate than trash through AVI. Implementing an EPS ban would provide effective litter source reduction and Dublin would receive an additional 3% trash load reduction credit under the MRP. The 3% trash load reduction credit means Dublin would have to install fewer full-trash capture devices in the storm drain system to meet MRP trash load reduction mandates, saving capital costs and long-term maintenance expenditures. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 142-10 4.9.a Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: 1. April 2, 2019 Staff Report on Potential Citywide Ban of Expanded Polystyrene (Disposable Food Serviceware Ordinance) RESOLUTION NO. 142 - 10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ESTABLISHING A POLICY THAT BANS THE CITY'S PURCHASE AND USE OF SINGLE - USE PLASTIC BOTTLES AND STYROFOAM PRODUCTS AT CITY SPONSORED ACTIVITIES WHEREAS, City of Dublin is a regional leader in promoting environmentally sensitive public policy; and WHEREAS, the bottled water industry has experienced significant growth in recent years; and WHEREAS, the manufacturing of plastic beverage bottles requires a substantial amount or resources which result in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; and WHEREAS, polystyrene (Styrofoam) is the most abundant type of non -cigarette litter; and WHEREAS, in 2006, the State of California enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which requires California to reduce GHG statewide emissions to 1990 levels by 2020; and WHEREAS, reducing and eliminating waste, such as plastic beverage bottles and Styrofoam, that pollute our landfills is a good policy and helps the City reach its goals of achieving 75% diversion and reducing GHG emissions within the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin wishes to set a positive example for the community on environmental matters; and WHEREAS, the Policy sets forth guiding principles for the development and implementation of the City of Dublin's single -use plastic beverage bottle and Styrofoam product ban at City sponsored activities to accomplish the following: 1. Ban the City's purchase and use of single -use plastic beverage bottles at City sponsored activities (City events, City meetings or purchased with City funds for Staff use). 2. Eliminate the purchase and use of Styrofoam products by the City for City functions and activities. Styrofoam cups previously used at water coolers and for hot beverages shall be replaced with plastic and paper cups. 3. Conduct outreach and provide means of educating all City Staff to create awareness about the single -use plastic beverage bottle and Styrofoam product ban and alternatives. 4. Reduce the adverse environmental impacts associated with plastic beverage bottles and Styrofoam. 5. Promote composting of cups at City sponsored activities. Page 1 of 2 4.9.a Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: 1. April 2, 2019 Staff Report on Potential Citywide Ban of Expanded Polystyrene (Disposable Food Serviceware Ordinance) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby adopt the policy attached hereto as Exhibit A entitled "Single -use Plastic Beverage Bottle and Styrofoam Product Ban Policy." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21 st day of September, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Biddle, Hildenbrand, Scholz, and Mayor Sbranti NOES: Councilmember Hart ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 111\1/ I J, j .41 __ Mayor ATTES City Clerk Reso No. 142-10, Adopted 9-21-10, Item 8.2 Page 2 of 2 4.9.a Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: 1. April 2, 2019 Staff Report on Potential Citywide Ban of Expanded Polystyrene (Disposable Food Serviceware Ordinance) EXHIBIT A qq Single -use Plastic Beverage Bottle and Styrofoam Product Ban Policy Purpose This policy sets forth the guiding principles for the development and implementation of the City of Dublin's Single -use Plastic Beverage Bottle and Styrofoam Product Ban at City sponsored activities. Goals The goals of the Single -use Plastic Beverage Bottle and Styrofoam Product ban are to: 1) Eliminate the purchase and use of single -use plastic beverage bottles by the City at City sponsored activities (City events, City meetings or purchased with City funds for Staff use). 2) Eliminate the use of Styrofoam products at City offices. Styrofoam cups previously used at water coolers and for hot beverages shall be replaced with plastic or paper cups. 3) Conduct outreach and provide means of educating all City Staff to create awareness about the single -use plastic beverage bottle and Styrofoam product ban and alternatives. 4) Reduce the adverse environmental impacts associated with plastic beverage bottles and Styrofoam. 5) Promote composting of cups at City sponsored activities. Definitions 1) Single -use plastic beverage bottles — single -use beverage containers, which includes water, sports drink, juice and soda. 2) Styrofoam products — products such as cups or food ware containers made from polystyrene, which is a non -biodegradable substance. 3) City activities — events sponsored and/or hosted by the City of Dublin, including St. Patrick's Day festival, Day on the Glen, National Night Out, seasonal functions as well as business meetings and normal every day activities. 4) Vendor — a person or business that sells goods or services. Page 1 of 2 4.9.a Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: 1. April 2, 2019 Staff Report on Potential Citywide Ban of Expanded Polystyrene (Disposable Food Serviceware Ordinance) t EXHIBIT A Policy The purchase and use of City supplied individual single -use plastic beverage bottlesisdiscontinuedatCitysponsoredactivities. In addition, City Staff will no longer purchase Styrofoam products for use at City facilities. This policy does not apply to any vendors at City sponsored activities. Policy Benefits As stated in the City of Dublin's vision, the City supports environmental stewardshipandsustainability. As such, the City of Dublin is environmentally conscious and strives to reduce its carbon footprint and greenhouse gas emissions. Eliminatingwasteandreductionofnon -biodegradable waste, such as plastic beverage bottles and Styrofoam in landfills, is a good policy. This ban is a step towards achieving theCity's goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the City. Paae 2 of 2 4.9.a Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 1. April 2, 2019 Staff Report on Potential Citywide Ban of Expanded Polystyrene (Disposable Food Serviceware Ordinance) Vendors of Readily Compostable or Recyclable Food Serviceware and BagsCompostable = Wood (W), Molded Fiber (F), and Paper (P)Recyclable = Aluminum (A) and Recyclable Plastic (RP)References to any commercial business, organization, or product does not constitute endorsement.Vendor Phone WebsiteBoxesBowlsCold cups & lidsCutleryHinged & lidded containersHot cups & lidsPaper BagsPlatesStrawsTrays and Cup Holders1 Alliance(312) 666- 6424www.allpfs.comP F, RP P, RPRP A, F, P P, RP P F, P,RPRP P, RP2 American Paper and Plastic Inc *(626) 444-0000www.appinc.comP P, RP CP, RP P, RP P P, RP RP3 Anchor Packaging(314) 822-7800www.reusecontainers.comRP RP4 Arrow Tableware(650) 871-8226www.arrowtableware.comFFFFF5 Bio Smart *(888) 310-2008www.biosmartpackaging.comP F, P F P F F6 Biodegradable Foodservice*(541) 593-2191www.bdfs.netFFPF7 Biodegradable Storewww.biodegradablestore.comF F P, RP F8 Birchware(888) 246-6089www.birchware.comW9 BiRite *(800) 227-5373www.birite.comP F P, RP F, P10Bridge-Gate Alliance(925) 417-0638www.bridge-gate.comFF FF11Cash and Carry *www.smartfoodservice.comF, P P, RP RP F P, RP F, P RP F12Cogent Solutions & Supplies*(800) 237-3103www.cogentsupplies.comF F, RPF P F, P F13Costco(800) 774-2678www.costco.comF, P P,RPRP P, RP P RP14EcNow Tech *(541) 223-3369www.ecnowtech.comF, P F, RP P F15Eco-Gecko Products(510) 220-5393www.eco-gecko.comFW F16Eco Greenwares(510) 656-9440www.ecogreenwares.comFFPFF17Ecoware Inc.(604) 880-1148www.ecowareproducts.comW18Excellent Packaging and Supply *(800) 317-2737www.excellentpackaging.comP F W F F, P F P F19Genpak *(518) 798-9511www.genpak.comFF F F20Green Is Green, Inc.(415) 215-8553www.greenisgreeninc.comFFFFF*Note that these vendors may carry non-compliant products in addition to those listed in the table. 4.9.bPacket Pg. 141Attachment: 2. List of Readily Compostable or Recyclable Food Serviceware Vendors (Disposable Food Vendor Phone WebsiteBoxesBowlsCold cups & lidsCutleryHinged & lidded containersHot cups & lidsPaper & compostable plastic BagsPlatesStrawsTrays and Cup Holders21Green Paper Products(216) 990-5464www.greenpaperproducts.comF, P F P, RP F F22Green Wave(714) 634-8822www.greenwave.us.comFFF23Greeno Products(800) 313-6568www.greenoproducts.comP F P, RP F24InstaWares(800) 892-3692www.instawares.comP P P, RP RP RP P P P RP P, RP, A25Lets Go Green *(678) 344-6834www.letsgogreen.bizF, P W F P, RP P F F26Litin Eco(612) 607-5700www.litineco.comFFFF27Majestic Sales *(877) 377-9023www.majesticsales.netF, RP P, RP F, P F, P RP28Maple Trade Corporation(415) 822-3888www.mapletradecorp.comRP RP RP P29Oliver(800) 253-3893www.oliverquality.comF30P & R Paper Supply(909) 794-1237www.prpaper.comP F, P,RPP RP F, RP P P F, P,RPRP A31Pactiv *(888) 828-2850www.pactiv.comRP RP RP P F A, F, P, RP32Prime Link Solutions(650) 375-1398www.primelinksolution.comF F, P F F33Rainbow Grocery(415) 863-0620www.rainbowgrocery.orgP34Red Pod, Inc *(650) 396-7550www.earthtoearthpack.comP, RP35Restaurant Depot *(714) 666-8211www.restaurantdepot.comP P P RP P, F P, RP P P F36RestockIt(800) 680-0859www.restockit.comP P P, RP RP P P P, RP37Sabert(800) 722-3781www.sabert.comRP RP RP RP, F38Smart and Final(800) 894-0511www.smartandfinal.comPRP P39Stalkmarket(503) 295-4977www.stalkmarketproducts.comFPFP40Sysco Food Services *(510) 226-3000www.syscosf.comP F, P,RPP,RPRP P, RP P, RP P F, P,RPRP, P F, P, RP41The Webstaurant Storewww.webstaurantstore.comP P, RP P A, F, RP42US Foodservice(877) 583-9659www.usfoodservice.comF, P,RPP RP F, P, RP P P F, P,RPRP F, P43Vegware(860) 779-7970www.vegware.usPF F P P F44VerTerra Ltd.(718) 383-3333www.verterra.comFFF45WorldCentric Store(650) 283-3797www.worldcentric.orgF F F F, P F*Note that these vendors may carry non-compliant products in addition to those listed in the table. 4.9.bPacket Pg. 142Attachment: 2. List of Readily Compostable or Recyclable Food Serviceware Vendors (Disposable Food   April [date], 2019    Restaurant  Address  Dublin, CA 94568      REGARDING: Potential Expanded Polystyrene Ban    Dear Restaurant Owner/Manager:    I am writing to inform you that at its April 2, 2019 meeting, City Council heard  a  report  on  a  potential  ban  of  expanded  polystyrene  (EPS)  for  use  as  disposable food serviceware.  A summary of the report findings includes the  following:     EPS is problematic for creeks and wildlife as it is light‐weight and  breaks down readily, causing it to easily enter the environment.    EPS is not easily or economically recyclable.   There are EPS alternatives available.   Many restaurant proprietors in Dublin have made the switch to EPS  alternatives.   An EPS ban would support several of the City of Dublin’s  environmental mandates and goals.    Dublin is one of only two cities in Alameda County that currently do  not have an EPS ban.     After receiving the report, City Council expressed interest in an EPS ban and  tasked Staff to notify the business community about the potential ban.  The  City Council recognizes that the ban will have an impact on the restaurants  that use EPS and asked Staff to facilitate the transition away from EPS to the  extent possible.      At  City  Council  direction,  staff  is  researching  alternative  approaches  to  implementing a potential ban.  When the research effort is complete, Staff  will  bring  a  follow‐up  report  to  City  Council  for  consideration.  Staff  anticipates the follow‐up report will be provided in Summer 2019.  In the  meantime, a video of the April 2, 2019 City Council meeting may be viewed  on‐line  at http://dublin.ca.gov/1604/Meetings‐Agendas‐Minutes‐ Video‐on‐Demand.  If you have any questions or concerns, you may  contact me at Shannan.young@dublin.ca.gov or 925‐833‐6630.    Cordially,          Shannan Young  Environmental Coordinator  Public Works Department  4.9.c Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 3. Letter to Restaurants (Disposable Food Serviceware Ordinance) Dublin Disposable Food Serviceware 1 ORDINANCE NO. __ - 19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ************** ADDING CHAPTER 5.34 (DISPOSABLE FOOD SERVICEWARE) TO TITLE 5 (PUBLIC WELFARE) OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has a duty to protect the natural environment and the health of its citizens; and WHEREAS, expanded polystyrene litters city storm drains, streets, creeks, parks and other public places; and WHEREAS, expanded polystyrene in the environment may become part of the food chain, resulting in negative impacts to wildlife; and WHEREAS, banning expanded polystyrene disposable food serviceware in the City of Dublin will help address pollution by requiring the use of compostable or recyclable alternatives while helping educate business owners and citizens about the positive impact their packaging choices can make; and WHEREAS, there is no currently economically feasible means of recycling expanded polystyrene disposable food serviceware in the City of Dublin ; and WHEREAS, due to these concerns, a number of California cities have banned expanded polystyrene disposable food serviceware, and many local businesses and several national corporations have successfully replaced expanded polystyrene food serviceware; and WHEREAS, the City’s goal is to replace expanded polystyrene disposable food serviceware with alternative products that are compostable and recyclable. 4.9.d Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 4. Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to the Dublin Municipal Code (Disposable Food Serviceware Dublin Disposable Food Serviceware 2 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 5.34 of the Dublin Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows: Chapter 5.34 DISPOSABLE FOOD SERVICEWARE 5.34.010. Purpose A. The purpose of this Chapter shall be to reduce garbage in landfills and assist the City with meeting its recycling goals and Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit requirements. B. The requirements of this Chapter do not replace or supplant the requirements of California or Federal law. 5.34.020. Definitions In addition to the general definitions applicable to this Code, whenever used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below: A. “City facility users” means all persons, societies, associations or organizations or special events promoters that require a permit to use a city facility as defined in Chapter 5.100, Parks and Recreation Areas and Facilities; or that require a special events permit for events which require city services, involve city-owned property such as streets and plazas, closure of public right-of-way or impair emergency vehicle access, and parades, as defined in Chapter 5.12, Parades and Events, and including permits to reserve or rent a city facility, including concession contracts with the city and city-managed concessions, city- sponsored events, and food services provided at city expense. These city facility 4.9.d Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 4. Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to the Dublin Municipal Code (Disposable Food Serviceware Dublin Disposable Food Serviceware 3 permits also include but are not limited to picnic area reservations, park use application permits, field reservations, rental facilities, historic buildings and senior center rentals, and permits for gatherings and meetings in all parks and recreation areas which include group picnics and organized gatherings, educational, entertainment or recreation for 25 or more persons. B. “Compostable” means that all materials in the product or package will biodegrade or otherwise become part of usable compost (e.g., soil conditioning material, mulch) in an appropriate composting program or facility. These products are made primarily from natural fibers such as paper, cardboard, wood, bamboo, sugarcane, or wheat stalks. These products may have very thin (de minimis) polyethylene or polylactic acid coatings only, and uncoated products are preferred. Rigid compostable plastic products are not compliant. C. “Disposable food serviceware” means single-use disposable products used by food vendors or city facility users for serving or transporting prepared and ready- to-consume food or beverages. This includes, but is not limited to, plates, cups, bowls, trays and hinged or lidded containers. This definition does not include single-use disposable straws, utensils, or cup lids. D. “Expanded polystyrene” means a thermoplastic petrochemical material utilizing the styrene monomer, marked with recycling symbol No. 6, p rocessed by any number of techniques including, but not limited to, fusion of polymer spheres (expandable bead polystyrene), injection molding, form molding, and extrusion - blow molding (extruded foam polystyrene), sometimes referred to as Styrofoam™, a Dow Chemical Company trademarked form of polystyrene foam insulation. In food service, expanded polystyrene is generally used to make cups, bowls, plates, trays, and clamshell containers. E. “Food vendor” means any establishment which provides prepared food or beverages for public consumption within the City of Dublin, including, but not 4.9.d Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 4. Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to the Dublin Municipal Code (Disposable Food Serviceware Dublin Disposable Food Serviceware 4 limited to, any store, supermarket, delicatessen, restaurant, retail food vendor, sales outlet, shop, cafeteria (including schools and corporate centers), catering truck or vehicle, sidewalk or other outdoor vendor, or caterer. F. “Prepared food” means any food or beverage prepared for consumption using any cooking, packaging, or food preparation technique by a food vendor or city facility user. “Prepared food” does not include uncooked meat, fish, poultry, or eggs unless provided for consumption without further food preparation. G. “Recyclable” means any material included as part of the commercial recycling program including, but not limited to, paper, glass, metal, cardboard, and plastic. H. “Commercial recycling program” means the city of Dublin’s adopted commercial recycling program. 5.34.030. Use of Expanded Polystyrene Food Serviceware Prohibited. A. A food vendor that offers prepared food shall utilize only disposable food serviceware that is either recyclable or compostable. The use of disposable food serviceware manufactured with expanded polystyrene is prohibited, unless otherwise specified in this chapter. B. All City facility users are prohibited from using disposable food service wares made from expanded polystyrene. All city facility users shall use a suitable recyclable or compostable product for disposable food serviceware. 4.9.d Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 4. Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to the Dublin Municipal Code (Disposable Food Serviceware Dublin Disposable Food Serviceware 5 5.34.040. Exemptions The Public Works Director, or his or her designee, shall have the responsibility to grant waivers or exemptions from the requirements of this chapter. A. Application for Exemption. If a food vendor or city facility user can demonstrate undue hardship resulting from compliance with the provisions of this chapter, or that a container required by the food vendor or city facility user is only available in expanded polystyrene, then the food vendor or city facility user may apply, in writing, for a one-year exemption from compliance. The Public Works Director or his/her designee will review the application for exemption and may meet with the applicant to discuss possible ways of meeting the requirements of this chapter. If the Public Works Director or his/her designee determines that compliance with the provisions of this chapter would cause the food vendor or City facility user to experience undue hardship, or that a non-expanded polystyrene version of a necessary conta iner is not available, then the Public Works Director or his/her designee shall grant the food vendor or city facility user a one-year exemption. At the end of the one-year exemption, the food vendor or city facility user will be required to comply with this chapter or submit another exemption application to be reviewed by the Public Works Director or his/her designee. B. Prepackaged Foods. Prepared food prepackaged outside the limits of the city of Dublin (i.e., commercially packaged foods) are exempt from the provisions of this chapter. This exemption does not apply to food vendors as defined in this chapter, including caterers which provide prepared food for public consumption within the city of Dublin. Purveyors of food prepared or packaged outside the City are encouraged to follow the provisions of this Chapter. C. Emergency Supplies or Services Procurement. Food vendors, city facility users, city franchises, and contractors doing business with the City shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter in a situation deemed by the City Council or City Manager, 4.9.d Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 4. Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to the Dublin Municipal Code (Disposable Food Serviceware Dublin Disposable Food Serviceware 6 or his or her designee, to be an emergency for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, or welfare. 5.34.050. Enforcement and Penalties A. Enforcement. Public Works Director or his/her agent has primary responsibility for the enforcement of this Chapter. The Public Works Director or his/her agent is authorized to promulgate regulations and to take any and all other actions reasonable and necessary to enforce this Chapter, including , but not limited to, investigating violations, issuing fines, and entering the premises of any food vendor during business hours. Other City staff may assist with this enforcement responsibility by entering the premises of a food vendor as part of their regular inspection functions and reporting any alleged violations. B. Written Warning. If a food vendor or city facility user is found to be in violation of this chapter, the Public Works Director or his/her designee shall issue a written warning to the food vendor. C. Penalties for Violation. Any food vendor or city facility user that violates or fails to comply with any of the requirements of this chapter after written notice has been issued for a previous violation shall be guilty of an infraction punishable as specified in section 1.04.030 of this Code. Section 2. Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if any provision, clause, sentence, word or part thereof is held illegal, invalid, unconstitutional, or inapplicable to any person or circumstances, such illegality, invalidity, unconstitutionality, or inapplicability shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, clauses, sentences, sections, words or parts thereof of the ordinance or their applicability to other persons or circumstances. 4.9.d Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 4. Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to the Dublin Municipal Code (Disposable Food Serviceware Dublin Disposable Food Serviceware 7 Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days following its adoption. However, until March 1, 2020, the City will not enforce section 5.34.030(A) prohibiting food vendors from using disposable food service wares made from expanded polystyrene. Section 4. Posting. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be published or posted as required in Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of September 2019, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk 3331282.3 4.9.d Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 4. Ordinance Adding Chapter 5.34 (Disposable Food Serviceware) to the Dublin Municipal Code (Disposable Food Serviceware Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement for 6999 Dublin Boulevard Prepared by: Suzanne Iarla, Management Analyst II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider approving a Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement with Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee (property owner). The property owner has requested participation in the Commercial Facade Improvement Grant Program to assist with the facade improvements to Dublin Plaza commercial center, located at 6999 Dublin Boulevard. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Approving a Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement with Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee for Facade Improvements to Dublin Plaza Commercial Center located at 6999 Dublin Boulevard. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed Agreement provides a $70,000 grant to the applicant. Funding for this grant is available in the General Fund Reserve for Façade Improvement Grants. The Agreement amount is not to exceed $70,000. DESCRIPTION: In December 2011, the City Council adopted the Commercial Facade Improvement Grant Program (Program) as one way to improve the physical appearance of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) area and the segment of Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Dougherty Road (Program Area), and encourage the retention of existing businesses, as well as increase property values, tenant stability, and lease rates in the area. The Program leverages public funds and private investment to enhance the physical appearance and economic vitality of commercial businesses in the Program Area. In June 2016, the City Council adopted changes to the Program t o expand the allowance of architectural assistance, encourage timely results, to prioritize selection of 4.10 Packet Pg. 151 Page 2 of 3 projects which promote downtown activation (such as outside gathering and dining spaces), to promote project competitiveness, to clarify applicant preparedness, to make the requirements of the Program more understandable to applicants. Under the Program, commercial property owners or tenants with long -term leases (five or more years) within the Program Area can apply for one of two facade improvement grants. Applicants have the option between: 1. Mini-Grant - this grant provides reimbursement of up to $5,000 for commercial building facade improvements with no match requirement; or 2. Matching Grant - this grant provides a reimbursable matching grant of two -thirds (67%) of eligible project costs, up to a maximum of $70,000. The total cost of the improvement work must be more than $5,000. Receipt of a matching grant requires the approved applicant to contribute a minimum of one -third of the total cost of the facade improvement costs. In February 2019, Staff received an application for a matching grant from Fred Delanoy, (trustee of the Delanoy Trust), the property owner of Dublin Plaza commercial center. Dublin Plaza is the three-building commercial center located at 6999 Dublin Blvd, which is within the Program Area and home to Athens Burgers. The proposed façade improvements will focus on the Athens Burgers building and will also include painting of the additional buildings in the center. The façade improvements include, but are not limited to: • Replace the old wooden siding • Replace old awnings with modern, metal awnings • Replace signs to conform to City requirements • Replace the building trim, doors, windows and exterior finishes • Painting the building exterior for all three buildings The applicant estimates that the total façade improvements will cost more than $125,000. Of this amount, the owner is seeking reimbursement for $70,000, the maximum amount allowed per the Program's matching grant. The proposed Agre ement (Exhibit A to Attachment 1) provides the property owner with a grant to reimburse up to $70,000 of the total project cost. The Agreement as proposed, meets the criteria established in the Program. This Agreement will result in the improvements to th e façade of the property, thus enhancing the appearance and character of the Program Area, to the benefit of City residents. Staff believes that this facade improvement will achieve the goals of the Program as well as generate new retail interest, thus generating additional interest from other property owners in the area to participate in the Program. On February 19, 2019, the City Council’s Economic Development Committee considered the application and by consensus, the Committee recommended a grant not to exceed $70,000 to help offset improvements related to the façade improvements. This recommendation falls under the Committee's purview to provide policy guidance and direction on economic development activities. The Committee is requesting that the 4.10 Packet Pg. 152 Page 3 of 3 full City Council consider the recommendation to approve a grant not to exceed $70,000 for the improvements. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: Strategy 4: Focus efforts on ways to strengthen the City’s economic vitality, including the Downtown, through public investment and economic development. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Approving a Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement with Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee 4.10 Packet Pg. 153 RESOLUTION NO. __ – 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * APPROVING A COMMERCIAL FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH FRED N. DELANOY, TRUSTEE WHEREAS, for decades, state and local governments have used economic development incentives to attract or retain jobs and/or improve the local tax base; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dublin adopted Resolution No. 216-11 on December 20, 2011, which established a Commercial Facade Improvement Grant Program ("Program") intended to improve the physical appearance of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area and the segment of Dublin Boulevard between Village Parkway and Dougherty Road, encouraging the retention of existing businesses, as well as increase property values, tenant stability, and lease rates for the property; and WHEREAS, the Program authorizes the City of Dublin to enter into agreements with commercial property owners, or tenants with long-term leases (five or more years remaining on the lease at the time a Program application is submitted) to apply for either 1) a mini-grant for reimbursement of up to $5,000; or 2) a matching grant, that provides a reimbursable matching grant of two-thirds (67%) of eligible project costs, up to a maximum of $70,000; and WHEREAS, the applicant owns certain real property located at 6999 Dublin Boulevard (A.P.N. 941-0210-027-01), ("the Property"), located in the Program area within the City; and WHEREAS, the applicant intends to improve the facade of the Athens Burgers building on the Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this agreement serves a public purpose in that it will help improve the physical appearance of Dublin Boulevard in the Program area, encourage the retention of existing businesses, and increase property values and tenant stability, thus benefitting the City and its residents. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve a Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement with Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee not to exceed $70,000 for certain facade improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Resolution, in substantially the form attached. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ City Clerk 4.10.a Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 1. Resolution Approving a Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement with Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee (Façade Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 1 of 12 City Grant Amount: $70,000 Matching Funds: $55,000 Estimated Project Total: $125,000 COMMERCIAL FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND DELANOY PROPERTIES CO. THIS COMMERCIAL FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated as of this 20 day of August, 2019, the date of execution by the City (the “Effective Date”) is entered into by and between the City of Dublin, a public body corporate and politic ("City") and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee (“Owner” and “Applicant”). R E C I T A L S A. The City has adopted a Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program (“Program”) in order to provide grants to certain owners or tenants of eligible buildings who design and construct improvements to the facades of their buildings. B. Applicant owns certain real property located at 6999 Dublin Boulevard (A.P.N. 941-0210-027-01), in Dublin, California (the “Site”), and within the boundaries outlined by the Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Guidelines (“Program Guidelines”). C. Applicant has submitted an application to the City pursuant to the Program Guidelines for a grant for certain improvements to the Site, and City has determined that Applicant and the Site meet the eligibility criteria for the Program. D. City desires to enter into this Agreement because improvement of the Site will enhance the physical appearance and economic vitality of commercial businesses, encourage full occupancy of storefronts, generate additional tax revenue and assist in providing an environment for the social, psychological and economic growth and well-being in the boundaries outlined by the Program Guidelines and the citizens of the City. E. Applicant desires to enter into this Agreement with City to receive assistance in making certain improvements to the Site, and City is willing to do so on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. A G R E E M E N T NOW, THEREFORE, City and Applicant hereby agree as follows: Section 1. GENERAL. 1.1 Term. This Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and expire five (5) years following the Applicant’s approval of contractor’s notice of completion (“Term”). Section 2. IMPROVEMENT OF THE SITE. 2.1 Scope of Work. Applicant shall complete the proposed project in accordance with the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (the “Project”). 4.10.b Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 2 of 12 2.2 Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Funds. The City agrees to reimburse to the Applicant a sum not to exceed seventy thousand dollars ($70,000) (the “Grant Amount”), for certain eligible improvements (the “Eligible Improvements”) as set forth below: a. The Grant Amount may be used only to fund those Eligible Improvements identified in Exhibit 1 attached hereto. b. All services to be performed by a third-party contractor shall be the subject of agreement between Applicant and the third-party contractors. The City shall not assume any liability for such agreements. The Applicant shall submit to the City all invoices from the contractor or contractors for work performed on the Eligible Improvements in order to receive reimbursement. c. A representative of the City shall inspect the completed Project after a notice of completion has been submitted to the City. d. The City will only issue the Grant Amount after the Project has been completed. Upon determination by the City's representative that Project has been completed in conformance with the Scope of Work (Exhibit 1) and the City approvals, the City shall issue a check made payable to the Applicant in an amount equal to the lesser of the Grant Amount or the actual amount of the invoices submitted to the City by the Applicant. The City Manager in his or her sole discretion may issue the Grant Amount at an earlier time than set forth in this Section 2.2(d), if the Applicant can demonstrate good cause. e. Any and all costs of the Project including, but not limited to the Eligible Improvements, which are in excess of the Grant Amount, shall be the sole responsibility of, and be borne by, the Applicant. 2.3 Permits and Approvals. Before commencement of the Project, Applicant shall secure or cause to be secured any and all permits which may be required by the City and any other governmental agency affected by such construction or work. 2.4 Commencement of the Project. Within 60 days after the Effective Date, Applicant shall have selected and authorized one or more contractors to complete the Project, and shall have provided notice to the City of such selection and authorization. In the event the Applicant fails to select and authorize a contractor or contractors to complete the Project within such 60-day period, the City may, at its option, terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the Applicant. In such event, neither party shall have any further rights against or liability to the other in connection to this Agreement. All contractors performing work on the Project must be licensed in the State of California. 2.5 Building Permit. A Building Permit must be obtained within six months of the Effective Date. In the event the Applicant fails to obtain a Building Permit within such six-month period, the City may, at its option, terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the Applicant. In such event, neither party shall have any further rights against or liability to the other in connection to this Agreement. An additional six-month extension may be approved with the City’s prior written consent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no work shall be performed prior to both 1) issuance of the Building Permit and 2) approval of this Agreement by the Dublin City Council. Any work performed prior to both building permit issuance and City Council approval will not be eligible for reimbursement. 2.6 Completion of the Project. Applicant shall complete the Project and satisfy all other obligations and conditions of this Agreement within 120 days of building permit issuance. This completion date is subject to revision from time to time as mutually agreed upon in writing between Applicant and the City Manager, or their designee. Upon completion, Applicant shall require contractors’ completion notice signed by the contractor. When the Project is completed as set forth in this Agreement, a notice of completion shall be delivered to and approved by the Applicant. Notice of completion shall then be delivered to the City as set forth in Section 2.2. 4.10.b Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 3 of 12 Section 3. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Before fully executing this Agreement, Applicant, at its own cost and expense, unless otherwise specified below, shall procure the types and amounts of insurance listed below against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Applicant and its agents, representatives, employees, and subcontractors. Consistent with the following provisions, Applicant shall provide proof satisfactory to City of such insurance that meets the requirements of this section and under forms of insurance satisfactory in all respects, and that such insurance is in effect prior to beginning work. Applicant shall maintain the insurance policies required by this section throughout the term of this Agreement. Applicant shall not allow any contractor to commence work on any subcontract until Contractor has obtained all insurance required herein for the subcontractor(s) and provided evidence to City that such insurance is in effect. VERIFICATION OF THE REQUIRED INSURANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND MADE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT PRIOR TO EXECUTION. Applicant shall maintain all required insurance listed herein for the duration of this Agreement. 3.1 Workers’ Compensation. 3.1.1 General Requirements. Before beginning any work under this Agreement, Applicant’s contractor(s) shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for any and all persons employed directly or indirectly by contractor. The Statutory Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per accident. In the alternative, contractor may rely on a self-insurance program to meet these requirements, but only if the program of self- insurance complies fully with the provisions of the California Labor Code. Determination of whether a self-insurance program meets the standards of the California Labor Code shall be solely in the discretion of the Contract Administrator. The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents, and subcontractors. 3.1.2 Submittal Requirements. To comply with Subsection 3.1, Applicant shall submit the following: a. Certificate of Workers’ Compensation Insurance in the amounts specified in the section for all contractor(s) performing work related to the Project; and b. Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement as required by the section for all contractor(s) performing work related to the Project. 3.2 Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance Requirements. Before beginning any work under this Agreement, Applicant and its contractor(s) shall procure "occurrence coverage" insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Applicant or its contractor and its agents, representatives, employees, and subcontractors. Applicant shall provide proof satisfactory to City of such insurance that meets the requirements of this section and under forms of insurance satisfactory in all respects to the City. Applicant shall maintain the insurance policies required by this section throughout the term of this Agreement. Applicant shall not allow any contractor or subcontractor to commence work on until Applicant has obtained all insurance required herein for the contractor or subcontractor(s) and provided evidence thereof to City. Verification of the required insurance shall be submitted and made part of this Agreement prior to execution. 4.10.b Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 4 of 12 It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to City as an additional insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. The additional insured coverage under the Applicant’s policy shall be “primary and non-contributory” and will not seek contribution from City’s insurance or self- insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 10. In the event Applicant fails to maintain coverage as required by this Agreement, City at its sole discretion may purchase the coverage required and the cost will be paid by Applicant. Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right to exercise later. All insurance required by this section is to be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. 3.2.1 Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance. 3.2.1.1 General requirements. Applicant and all contractors and subcontractors, at their own cost and expense, shall maintain commercial general and automobile liability insurance for the term of this Agreement in an amount not less than TWO MILLION DOLLARS ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence, combined single limit coverage for risks associated with the work contemplated by this Agreement. If a Commercial General Liability Insurance or an Automobile Liability form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit. Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property resulting from activities contemplated under this Agreement, including the use of owned and non-owned automobiles. 3.2.1.2 Minimum scope of coverage. Commercial general coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability occurrence form CG 0001. Automobile coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability form CA 0001 Code 1 (“any auto”). 3.2.1.3 Additional requirements. Each of the following shall be included in the insurance coverage or added as an endorsement to the policy: a. City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to each of the following: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Applicant, including the insured’s general supervision of Applicant; products and completed operations of Applicant; premises owned, occupied, or used by Applicant; and automobiles owned, leased, or used by the Applicant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. b. The insurance shall cover on an occurrence or an accident basis, and not on a claims-made basis. c. An endorsement must state that coverage is primary insurance with respect to the City and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, and that no insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City shall be called upon to contribute to a loss under the coverage. 4.10.b Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 5 of 12 d. Any failure of Applicant to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers. e. An endorsement shall state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. Applicant shall notify City within 14 days of notification from Applicant’s insurer if such coverage is suspended, voided or reduced in coverage or in limits. f. For Applicant’s contractors and subcontractors, an endorsement for completed operations for the construction project, such as the CG 20 37 “Additional Insured—Owners, Lessees or Contractors—Completed Operations” endorsement form, shall be submitted by Applicant to the City no later than 30 days after completion of the Project. 3.2.1.4 Submittal Requirements and Verification of coverage. Applicant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and with original endorsements effecting coverage required herein. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies and endorsements. Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right to exercise later. a. Prior to execution of this Agreement, Applicant shall submit:  Certificate(s) of Commercial General Insurance and Automobile Liability Insurance; and  Additional Insured Endorsement such as CG 20 10 “Designated Person Or Organization Endorsement”. b. Prior to commencement of the Project as described in Section 2.4., Applicant shall furnish City with contractor’s certificates of insurance and with original endorsements effecting coverage required herein. 3.2.1.5 Contractors and Subcontractors. Applicant agrees to include with all contractors or subcontracts the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the Indemnification and Insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of the Subcontractor’s work. Contractors or subcontractors hired by Applicant agree to be bound to Applicant and the City in the same manner and to the same extent as Applicant is bound to the City under the Contract Documents. 3.2.1.6 Variation. The City may approve a variation in the foregoing insurance requirements, upon a determination that the coverages, scope, limits, and forms of such insurance are either not commercially available, or that the City’s interests are otherwise fully protected. 3.2.1.7 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) and/or deductibles must be disclosed to the City for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any self-insured retention provision and/or deductibles shall 4.10.b Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 6 of 12 provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR and/or deductibles may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City. 3.2.1.8 Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect City as a named insured. 3.2.1.9 Notice of Reduction in Coverage. In the event that any coverage required by this section is reduced, limited, or materially affected in any other manner, Applicant shall provide written notice to City at Applicant’s earliest possible opportunity and in no case later than five days after Applicant is notified of the change in coverage. 3.2.2 Term of Coverage. Applicant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain all insurance policies required by this Agreement for the duration of the Agreement’s Term. Applicant shall require that all contractors and subcontractors, at their own cost and expense, maintain the insurance policies required by this Agreement until the Project is complete and the Applicant accepts contractor’s completion notice. 3.2.3. Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Applicant fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option exercise any of the following remedies, which are alternatives to other remedies City may have and are not the exclusive remedy for Applicant’s breach:  Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the Agreement;  Order Applicant to stop work under this Agreement or withhold any payment that becomes due to Applicant hereunder, or both stop work and withhold any payment, until Applicant demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof; and/or  Terminate this Agreement. Section 4. PREVAILING WAGES. Applicant shall require any contractors performing work under this Agreement to pay prevailing wages pursuant to the requirements of the California Labor Code, Section 1771, et seq. For the purpose of this Agreement, prevailing wages are the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute this Agreement as ascertained by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California. The holidays upon which such rates shall be paid shall be all holidays recognized in the collective bargaining agreement applicable to the particular craft, classification, or type of worker employed on the project. The Contractors and each subcontractor shall keep an accurate payroll record showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker or other employee employed by the Contractors or subcontractors in connection with the Project. The payroll records shall be kept in accordance with the provisions of Section 1776 of the California Labor Code, and Contractor and each subcontractor shall otherwise comply with requirements of such Section 1776. 4.10.b Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 7 of 12 Section 5. NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY. Applicant shall not discriminate, on the basis of a person’s race, sex, gender, religion (including religious dress and grooming practices), national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition (including cancer and genetic characteristics), marital status, age, sexual orientation, color, creed, pregnancy, genetic information, gender identity or expression, political affiliation or belief, military/veteran status, or any other classification protected by applicable local, state, or federal laws (each a “Protected Characteristic”), against any employee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, bidder for a subcontract, or participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Applicant under this Agreement. Applicant shall include the provisions of this Subsection in any subcontract approved by the Contract Administrator or this Agreement. Section 6. MAINTENANCE COVENANTS. The Applicant covenants and agrees, for itself, its successors, its assigns and every successor in interest to the Site or any part thereof, that the Applicant will maintain, at Applicant's own cost and expense, the improvements on the Site in a clean and orderly condition, free of graffiti, and in good condition and repair, and will keep the Site free from any accumulation of debris and waste materials. Any damage to the building visible from the street is to be repaired immediately. The Applicant shall promptly touch up painted areas and perform any other repairs needed to maintain an attractive building appearance, including cleaning all awnings, if any, at least once a year. The foregoing covenants shall remain in effect for a period of 60 months from the completion of the Project. During this 60-month period, Applicant agrees, for itself, its successors, its assigns and every successor in interest, that it will not materially alter the improvements made with City funds, without the prior written consent of City which consent may be conditioned by City to preserve those features to the extent necessary to achieve the objectives of City for entering into this Agreement. Any violation of this section not cured within 60 days shall entitle City to reimbursement of the funds granted by City from the person or entity responsible for the violation. 6.1 Improvements Cannot Be Removed by Applicant Without City’s Consent. All Eligible Improvements will become permanent fixtures of the property and cannot be removed by Owner upon expiry or termination of the lease of current tenant at the Site or sale of the property. Exceptions can be made with the prior written consent of the City. Any violation of this section not cured within 60 days shall entitle City to reimbursement of the funds granted by City from the person or entity responsible for the violation. Section 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 7.1 Rights of Access. Representatives of the City shall have the reasonable right to access the Site, without charges or fees, for the purpose of inspecting the Project, including the Eligible Improvements. City (or its representatives) shall, except in emergency situations, give Applicant reasonable advance notice prior to exercising its rights herein. Nothing herein shall be deemed to limit the ability of the City to conduct code enforcement and other administrative inspections of the Site in accordance with applicable law. 7.2 Compliance with Laws. Applicant shall carry out the Project in conformity with all applicable federal, state and local laws, including Labor Code requirements; City zoning and development standards; building, plumbing, mechanical and electrical codes; all other provisions of the City's Municipal Code; and all applicable disabled and handicapped access requirements, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et seq., Government Code Section 4450, et seq., Government Code Section 11135, et seq., and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code Section 51, et seq. 4.10.b Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 8 of 12 7.3 Assignment. Applicant shall have the right to assign all of its rights and obligations under this Agreement, provided however that any such assignment shall be effective only upon receipt by City of written notice of the assignment. 7.4 Notices, Demands and Communications between the Parties. Any approval, disapproval, demand, document or other notice ("Notice") which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and shall be given by certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid, personal delivery, or reputable overnight courier (but not by facsimile or email), to the party to whom the Notice is directed at the address of the party as set forth below, or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. To City: City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 (925) 833-6650 Attention: City Manager To Applicant: Delanoy Properties Company 373 Village Square Orinda CA 94563 Attention: Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Phone: 925-257-7077 Email: FredDelanoy@att.net Any Notice shall be deemed received on the date of delivery if delivered by personal service, on the date of delivery or refused delivery as shown by the return receipt if sent certified mail, and on the date of delivery or refused delivery as shown by the records of the overnight courier if sent via nationally recognized overnight courier. Notices sent by a party's attorney on behalf of such party shall be deemed delivered by such party. 4.10.b Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 9 of 12 7.5 Relationship between City and Applicant. It is hereby acknowledged that the relationship between City and Applicant is not that of a partnership or joint venture and that City and Applicant shall not be deemed or construed for any purpose to be the agent of the other. Accordingly, except as expressly provided herein or in the Attachments hereto, City shall have no rights, powers, duties or obligations with respect to the development, operation, maintenance or management of the Site or the Eligible Improvements. Applicant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City from any claim made against City arising from a claimed relationship of partnership or joint venture between City and Applicant with respect to the development, operation, maintenance or management of the Site or the Eligible Improvements. 7.6 Integration. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged in this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. 7.7 Modifications. Any alteration, change or modification of or to this Agreement, in order to become effective, shall be made in writing and in each instance signed on behalf of each party. 7.8 Conflicts of Interest. No member, official or employee of City shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is directly or indirectly interested. 7.9 Applicant's Indemnity; Waiver. Applicant shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to City), protect and hold City, and its officers, employees, agents and representatives, harmless from, any and all Claims of any kind or nature arising out of the Project or this Agreement or the implementation hereof, including, but not limited to, any damages to property, injuries to persons or accidental death (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs), which may be caused by the work performed under this Agreement or any activities associated with the Project, whether such activities or work is performed by Applicant or by anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by Applicant. Applicant's indemnity obligations under this section shall survive termination of this Agreement. Applicant's indemnity obligations under this section shall not extend to claims, demands, damages, defense costs or liability for property damage, bodily injury or death occasioned by the active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, or its officers, employees, agents or representatives. Applicant hereby waives, releases and discharges forever the City, and its employees, officers, volunteers, agents and representatives, from any and all present and future Claims arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, the performance of the work, or Applicant's obligation to comply with all laws with respect to the work. 7.10 Non-liability of Officials and Employees of City. No member, official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to Applicant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Applicant or its successors, or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. 7.11 Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of laws principles, shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. 7.12 No Third Party Rights. This Agreement is made and entered into solely for the benefit of the City and Applicant and no other third party shall have any right of action under this Agreement. 4.10.b Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, 4.10.b Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 11 of 12 EXHIBIT NO. 1 PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK Rendering of new façade for 6999 Dublin Boulevard (A.P.N. 941-0210-027-01) in Dublin CA: 4.10.b Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement between City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Trustee Page 12 of 12 EXHIBIT NO. 2 ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS Applicant is the property owner of the Dublin Plaza Commercial Center including the certain real property located at 6999 Dublin Boulevard, Dublin CA and shall construct and install the façade improvements (on the building occupied by Athen’s Burgers) including, but not limited to the following:  Replace wood siding with cement plaster  New wainscot added to lower portion of the building  Replace awnings with new metal awnings  Exterior paint  New signage  New doors and windows  New trash enclosure gates 4.10.b Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Commercial Façade Improvement Grant Program Between the City of Dublin and Fred N. Delanoy, Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Award of Contract to Chrisp Company for On-Call Pavement Striping and Marking Prepared by: Sai Midididdi, Associate Civil Engineer (Traffic) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider awarding an On-Call Striping and Marking Contract to Chrisp Company for the installation and replacement of pavement striping and markings throughout the City on an as-needed basis. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Awarding a Contract for On-Call Striping and Marking to Chrisp Company. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The lowest responsive bid for the project was $105,550, which represents the unit costs for pavement striping and markings based on estimated quantities over the three -year duration of the contract. The Fiscal Year 2019 - 20 operating budget for pavement striping and markings is $ 53,295. Staff will request City Council appropriate similar operating budget amounts in future fiscal years. The striping and markings work on City roadways is funded through the State Gas Tax Fund and there will be no impact to the General Fund. A construction contingency of $18,100 is requested for any unforeseen issues on a yearly basis. Sufficient funding is available in the operating budget to cover the contract and contingency costs. DESCRIPTION: Annual operation and maintenance of City streets includes installation or replacement of pavement striping and pavement markings. Pavement striping and marking services are specialized and best provided by a separate contract from the City's maintenance contract with MCE. Although budget for pavement striping and markings is appropriated annually, Staff proposes a three -year contract for these services in order 4.11 Packet Pg. 167 Page 2 of 2 to provide a continuity of service from one contractor and to reduce Staff time spent annually soliciting bids. The scope of work for the contract includes the installation and replacement of pavement striping and m arkings on an as-needed basis throughout the City. Staff solicited bids for an On-Call Striping and Marking Contract on June 24, 2019. The City received one bid from Chrisp Company for $105,550 on July 18, 2019. Chrisp Company is a leading contractor in the Bay Area with expertise in installation of pavement striping and markings. Chrisp Company is often a sub-contractor on street construction and pavement maintenance contracts and has performed satisfactorily on several City projects. This contract establishes unit prices for various striping and marking bid items. Staff has reviewed the bid results, checked references and necessary licenses, and recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution (Attachment 1) awarding the On-Call Striping and Marking Contract to Chrisp Company as the lowest responsive bidder. Individual task orders will be issued by Staff and will be priced based on the unit prices provided in the bid documents. To minimize construction delays and to address any unforeseen work, it is requested that the City Manager be authorized to approve change orders up to the contingency amount of $18,100 per year over a period of three years. This project is exempt under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: A copy of this staff report was sent to Chrisp Company. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution - Awarding a Contract for On-Call Striping and Marking to Chrisp Company 4.11 Packet Pg. 168 RESOLUTION NO. XX- 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR ON-CALL STRIPING AND MARKING TO CHRISP COMPANY WHEREAS the City of Dublin did, on July 18, 2019, publicly open, examine, and declare the sealed bid for doing the work described in the approved Bid Docum ents and Specifications for On-Call Striping and Marking Contract, which Bid Documents and Specifications are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said work and for all particulars relative to the proceedings under the request for bids; and WHEREAS, said bids were submitted to the Public Works Director, who has recommended that the bid hereinafter is the lowest responsive bid for doing said work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby award the On-Call Striping and Marking Contract, to the lowest responsive bidder Chrisp Company at a bid of One Hundred and Five Thousand and Five Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($105,550), the particulars of which bid are on file in the Office of the Public Works Director. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve the Contract Change Orders based on the appropriate funds designated for the Contract up to the contingency amount of Eighteen Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($18,100) per year for a duration of the Contract. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute the Contract Agreement with Chrisp Company which expires on June 30, 2022. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2019, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk 4.11.a Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 1. Resolution - Awarding a Contract for On-Call Striping and Marking to Chrisp Company (Award of Contract - Striping and Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Amendment to Legal Services Prepared by: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Meyers Nave has requested that the City Council consider amending its legal services agreement with the City to increase the hourly rate for general legal services, litigation services, and reimbursable third-party services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement for Legal Services and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed amendment to the agreement for legal services would increase the hourly rates as follows: General Legal Services $265 per hour to $280 per hour Litigation Services $315 per hour to $335 per hour Reimbursable Legal Services Range: $290-$410 per hour to Range: $300-$425 per hour DESCRIPTION: The City of Dublin has contracted with Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson (or its predecessors) for legal services since the City’s incorporation in 1982. The City Council last amended the agreement on November 20, 2018 (Attachment 1). Meyers Nave has requested that the City Council consider the following changes to the Amended and Restated agreement: General Legal Services $265 per hour to $280 per hour Litigation Services $315 per hour to $335 per hour Reimbursable Legal Services Range: $290-$410 per hour to Range: $300-$425 per hour 4.12 Packet Pg. 170 Page 2 of 2 Attachment 2 is the proposed First Amendment to the Agreement for Legal Services. The only changes are those outlined above. The proposed amendment would take effect as of July 1, 2019. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement 2. First Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services 4.12 Packet Pg. 171 4.12.a Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) 4.12.a Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) 4.12.a Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) 4.12.a Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) 4.12.a Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) 4.12.a Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) 4.12.a Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) 4.12.a Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) 4.12.a Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) 4.12.a Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 1. 2018 Meyers Nave Agreement (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES This First Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement for Legal Services is made and entered into as of July 1, 2019, by and between the CITY OF DUBLIN, a Municipal Corporation in the State of California, hereinafter referred to as “CITY,” and MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON, hereinafter referred to as “MNRSW.” WITNESSETH WHEREAS, CITY and MNRSW are parties to an Amended and Restated Agreement for Legal Services, dated and entered into as of September 1, 2018; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties hereto to amend the agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that the Agreement for Legal Services is amended as follows: 1. Existing paragraph 4 is deleted and new paragraph 4 is added, to read as follows: “4. Compensation. City shall compensate ATTORNEY, through MNRSW, in the amount of $280 per hour for all services rendered, whether by ATTORNEY or by other attorneys associated with MNRSW, with the following exceptions: (a) litigation, for which ATTORNEY, through MNRSW, shall be compensated in the amount of $335 per hour for all litigation services rendered whether by ATTORNEY or by other attorneys associated with MNRSW; and (b) work for which the City is reimbursed by third parties, for which ATTORNEY, through MNRSW, shall be compensated at the following rates per hour for all services rendered whether by ATTORNEY or other attorneys associated with MNRSW: Senior Principal $425 Principal $360 Senior Associate and Of Counsel $315 Associate $290 MNRSW will also be reimbursed for customary costs and disbursements, including deposition and witness fees, court costs, telephone, photocopying, facsimile charges, computer research on-line fees and messenger services. ATTORNEY, through MNRSW, shall bill CITY at least on a monthly basis and CITY agrees to pay ATTORNEY within 30 days of such bill or statement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Amendment, the City shall have the right to retain the counsel other than MNRSW in particular matters.” 4.12.b Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 2. First Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement for Legal Services the day and year set forth below. Dated: Dated: CITY OF DUBLIN a Municipal Corporation By David Haubert, Mayor Attest: City Clerk MEYERS NAVE RIBACK SILVER & WILSON By John D. Bakker, Principal 3076860.1 4.12.b Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 2. First Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services (Legal Services Agmt Amendment) Page 1 of 5 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2019 Prepared by: Jay Baksa, Financial Analyst EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive an informational report of the City’s investments thr ough the quarter ending June 30, 2019 including a monthly transaction ledger. The City’s investment portfolio for this period totaled $286,533,795 (book value) with an average market yield of 2.13%. As required by the Policy, the City Treasurer (Administrative Services Director) affirms that the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact resulting from this report. Investments are made in accordance with the City Investment Policy and State Law. Interest earned is apportioned between funds (i.e. General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, etc.) based upon their proportionate share of the total cash balance. Based on the financial needs of the City including the timing of receipt of revenues and payment of expenditures, the quarterly cash balance can vary from quarter to quarter. DESCRIPTION: The total investment portfolio of $286,533,795 (book value) is comprised of $187,533,673 managed by Chandler Asset Management (Chandler), and $99,000,122 invested by the City in local government pools. The average marke t yield of the Chandler portfolio and the local pools was 2.13% and 2.43% respectively. The total investment portfolio balance fluctuates throughout the year due to normal cash flow needs and includes both discretionary and restricted funds. 4.13 Packet Pg. 184 Page 2 of 5 Economic Update Highlights The following are some highlights from the Economic Update included in the attached Investment Report prepared by Chandler (Attachment 1). US domestic economic data remains consistent with a slow growth environment; the US labor market is strong, wages are growing modestly, and inflation remains contained. However, headwinds to the economy have increased. Ongoing global trade disputes, slowing global economic growth, an uncertain outlook for Brexit, and geopolitical tensions have made the outlook uncertain. The trajectory of economic growth is likely to hinge on the outcome of ongoing trade negotiations as well as policy action by the major global central banks. Chandler believes there is a high level of political pressure to make progress toward a trade agreement with China before the election cycle heats up this fall. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) kept the target fed funds rate unchanged in June at a range of 2.25%-2.50% but did cut the target fed funds rate by 25 basis points the last week of July to a range of 2.00%-2.25%. Treasury yields declined further in June. At month-end, the 3-month T-bill yield was down 25 basis points to 2.09%, the 2-year Treasury yield was down 17 basis point to 1.76%, and the 10-year Treasury yield was down 12 basis points to 2.01%. An inversion of the yield curve in which the 10-year Treasury yield is lower than the 3-month T-bill yield is generally viewed as a powerful predictive signal of an upcoming recession. Although Chandlers’ six-month forecast does not call for a recession, they believe downside risks to the economy are building. Notably, sovereign 10 -year bond yields around the world were under pressure in June and the yields on both the 10 -year German Bund and 10-year Japanese Government Bond remained negative at month- end. City of Dublin Portfolio The City's portfolio managed by Chandler has maintained a healthy balance of investment types with minimal change from the prior quarter as shown below in Chart 1. 4.13 Packet Pg. 185 Page 3 of 5 Chart 1: Investments by Type March 31, 2019 - June 30, 2019 The market value of the City's portfolio increased by $5.08 million from the March 31, 2019 quarter, due to the receipt of property tax payments, which is the City’s largest revenue source, partially offset by expenditures on two large-scale Capital Improvement Projects (Dublin Boulevard Widening and the Police Services Building). The City’s portfolio also increased $35.53 million from the same quarter the prior year due to the excess of revenues over expenditures in Fiscal Year 2019-20 and the timing of payments on capital improvement projects (see Table 1 below). Overall market yield-to- maturity (YTM) decreased from 2.46% to 2.13% as shown in Table 2 below, as rates have been in steady decreasing as discussed in the Economic Update Highlights. For detailed monthly transactions, see Attachment 2. 4.13 Packet Pg. 186 Page 4 of 5 Table 1: Portfolio Values and Yield to Maturity Table 2: Quarterly Holdings (Market Value) by Type, and YTM, 5 Quarters Funds Managed by the City The City participates in two local agency investment pools managed by government finance professionals and treasurers: the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the California Asset Management Program (CAMP). The City has typically carried close to the $50 million maximum allowable in LAIF with any excesses deposited into CAMP. LAIF quarterly rates are currently the highest measured since 2011, as shown below. 4.13 Packet Pg. 187 Page 5 of 5 Table 3: Quarterly LAIF Yields, Recent Eight Years and 2 Quarters While the LAIF yield is currently at a high point, Chandler still advocates investing monies not needed for the next 18 months in a longer maturity strategy, as historically, over an investment cycle, the total return of a longer maturity investment strategy will be superior to a shorter maturity mandate. Accordingly, Staff will continue to look to the locally invested funds for short term needs while positioning the bulk of City funds for higher earnings over the long term. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: Strategy 1: Assure the City's long-term financial sustainability. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 4.13 Packet Pg. 188 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. | 800.317.4747 | www.chandlerasset.com INVESTMENT REPORT Period Ending June 30, 2019 City of Dublin 4.13.a Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) SECTION 1 Economic Update SECTION 2 Account Profile SECTION 3 Consolidated Information SECTION 4 Portfolio Holdings SECTION 5 Transactions Table of Contents As of June 30, 2019 1 4.13.a Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) SECTION |Section 1 |Economic Update 2 4.13.a Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) kept the target fed funds rate unchanged in June at a range of 2.25%-2.50%.In the policy statement, the Fed noted that market-based measures of inflation have declined and uncertainties about the economic outlook have increased. With regard to future policy adjustments, the Fed removed the word “patient”from the policy statement, and indicated they are prepared to act as appropriate to incoming data in order to sustain the economic expansion. The Fed did not make any changes to their balance sheet normalization program, and the runoff remains on track to end in September. There was one dissenting vote amongst the FOMC members, James Bullard, who was in favor of lowering the fed funds rate by 25 basis points. Economic Update ▪ ▪ ▪ In ourview,US domesticeconomicdataremains consistent with aslow growth environment; the US labormarket is strong, wages are growing modestly, and inflation remains contained. However, headwinds to the economy have increased. Ongoing global trade disputes, slowing global economic growth,an uncertain outlook for Brexit, and geopolitical tensions have made the outlook uncertain. The trajectory of economic growth is likely to hinge on the outcome of ongoing trade negotiations as well as policy action by the majorglobal central banks.We believe there is ahigh level of political pressure to make progress toward atrade agreement with Chinabefore the election cycle heats up this fall.We also believe adovish collective stance by major global central banks should help to combat the headwinds to global economic growth. Treasury yields declined further in June.At month-end, the 3-month T-bill yield was down 25 basis points to 2.09%, the 2- yearTreasury yield was down 17 basis point to 1.76%, and the 10-year Treasury yield was down 12 basis points to 2.01%.An inversion of the yield curve in which the 10-yearTreasury yield is lowerthan the 3-month T-bill yield is generally viewed as a powerful predictive signal of an upcoming recession. Although our 6-month forecast does not call for a recession,we believe downside risks to the economy are building. Notably, sovereign 10-yearbond yields around the world were under pressure in June and the yields on both the 10-year German Bund and 10-year Japanese Government Bond remained negative at month-end. Source: Bloomberg 3 4.13.a Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) U.S. nonfarm payrolls rose by 224,000 in June, well above the consensus forecast of 165,000. April and May payrolls were revised down by a total of just 11,000.On a trailing 3-month basis payrolls increased an average of 171,000, more than enough to absorb new entrants into the labor market. The unemployment rate ticked up to 3.7%in June from 3.6%in May as the participation rate also increased to 62.9% from 62.8%. A broader measure of unemployment called the U-6, which includes those who are marginally attached to the labor force and employed part time for economic reasons, also edged up to 7.2%in June from 7.1%in May. Wages rose 0.2%in June (slightly below expectations), following and upwardly revised 0.3% increase in May. On a year-over-year basis, wages were up 3.1% in June, versus up 3.2% in May. Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 MOM Change In (000's)Nonfarm Payroll (000's) 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0% 11.0% Unemployment Rate Underemployment Rate (U6) Unemployment Rate (U3)Rate (%)Employment 4 4.13.a Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) The Consumer Price Index (CPI) was up just 1.6% year-over-year in June, versus up 1.8% year-over-year in May. Core CPI (CPI less food and energy) was up 2.1% year-over-year in June, versus up 2.0% year-over-year in May. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index was up 1.5% year-over-year in May, versus up 1.6% year-over-year in April. Core PCE, which is the Fed's primary inflation gauge, was up 1.6% year-over- year in May, unchanged from April, remaining below the Fed’s 2.0% inflation target. Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Commerce 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% Consumer Price Index (CPI) CPI YOY % Change Core CPI YOY % ChangeYOY( %) Change0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) PCE Price Deflator YOY % Change PCE Core Deflator YOY % ChangeYOY( %) ChangeInflation 5 4.13.a Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Retail sales in June were stronger than expected,up 0.4%in the month versus expectations of 0.1%, following an increase of 0.4%in May. Excluding autos and gas, retail sales were even stronger in June, up 0.7% (outpacing expectations of 0.4%). On a year-over-year basis, total retail sales were up 3.4% year-over-year in June, versus 2.9% year-over-year in May. The Consumer Confidence Index declined to 121.5 in June from 131.3 in May, falling below expectations, largely driven by concerns regarding the escalation in trade and tariff tensions. Despite the sharp decline in confidence in June, the index remains strong relative to longer-term historical levels. Source: US Department of Commerce Source: The Conference Board 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% Retail Sales YOY % Change YOY (%) Change100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 Index LevelConsumer Confidence Consumer 6 4.13.a Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) The Leading Economic Index (LEI) declined 0.3%in June,on a month-over-month basis, following a 0.1% increase in May.It was the first monthly contraction since December 2018.On a year-over-year basis, the index was up just 1.6%in June (the slowest pace since December 2016)versus up 2.5%in May. The Conference Board believes that economicgrowth will remain slow in the second half of the year. The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) remained negative in June at -0.02versus -0.03 in May.On a3-month movingaverage basis, the index was little changed at -0.26 in June versus -0.27 in May. The CFNAI suggests that the economy is slowing but is not indicative of a recession. Negative values are generally consistent with below-average growth. Periods of economic contraction have historically been associated with values below -0.70 on a 3-month moving average basis. -0.4% -0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)MOM ( %) Change-0.70 -0.50 -0.30 -0.10 0.10 0.30 0.50 0.70 Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI)3 Month AverageSource: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Activity 7 4.13.a Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Housing starts were nearly in line with expectations in June, down 0.9%to a 1.253 million annualized rate. Multi-family starts fell 9.2%to an annualized rate of 406,000, while single-family starts rose 3.5%to an annualized rate of 847,000. Total housing starts were up 6.2% year-over- year in June, driven by growth in multi-family starts. According to the Case-Shiller20-City home price index, home prices were up just 2.5% year- over-year in April, versus up 2.6% in March. The year-over-year pace of growth is at a 7-year low. Source: US Department of Commerce Source: S&P 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 MOM Change (In Thousands of Units)Housing Starts Multi Family Housing Starts Single Family Housing Starts 1.5% 2.5% 3.5% 4.5% 5.5% 6.5% 7.5% S&P/Case -Shiller 20 City Composite Home Price Index YOY( %) ChangeHousing 8 4.13.a Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) manufacturing index decreased to 51.7 in June from 52.1 in May. The June reading was slightly better than expected but still came in at the lowest level since October 2016.Nevertheless, a reading above 50.0 suggests the manufacturing sector is expanding. The Industrial Production index was up 1.3% year-over-year in June versus up 2.1% year-over-year in May.On amonth-over- month basis, production was flat, just below the consensus forecast of 0.1%. However, the manufacturing component of the index increased 0.4%in June, exceeding expectations of 0.2%, following a 0.2% increase in May. Capacity Utilization decreased to 77.9%in June from 78.1%in May, and remains below the long-run average of 79.8% indicating there is still excess capacity for growth. Source: Institute for Supply Management Source: Federal Reserve 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 Institute of Supply Management Purchasing Manager Index EXPANDING CONTRACTING 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% Industrial Production YOY( %) ChangeManufacturing 9 4.13.a Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) According to the third estimate, first quarterGDP grew at an annualized pace of 3.1%, unchanged from the second estimate and in line with the consensus. Despite the government shutdown and ongoing global trade disputes, GDP growth accelerated in the first quarter from 2.2%in the fourth quarter. Net exports and state and local government spending advanced in the first quarter, while consumer spending and business investment moderated. Residential investment contracted in the quarter. The consensus estimate for second quarter GDP growth is 1.8%. Overall, the consensus view calls for GDP growth of 2.5% this year versus 2.9% last year, which is consistent with moderate economic growth. Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce 6/18 9/18 12/18 3/19 2.6% 2.4% 1.7% 0.6% -0.1% 2.5% 0.7% 1.1% 1.2% -2.0% -0.1% 0.9% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% -0.1% 0.5% 4.2% 3.4% 2.2% 3.1% Net Exports and Imports Personal Consumption Expenditures Gross Private Domestic Investment Federal Government Expenditures State and Local (Consumption and Gross Investment) Components of GDP Total -2.0% -1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% Gross Domestic Product (GDP) GDP QOQ % Change GDP YOY % Change Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 10 4.13.a Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Source: Bloomberg The shape of the Treasury yield curve has changed significantly on ayear-over-yearbasis.As of month-end in June, the 3-month T-bill yield was up nearly 18 basis points, the 2-Year Treasury yield was down 77 basis points, and the 10-Year Treasury yield was down nearly 86 basis points, year-over-year. The current shape of the yield curve implies thatmarket participants are pricing-in multiple rate cuts.We believe the decline in long-term Treasury yields reflects a high level of market participants'nervousness about the outlook for global economic growth and adecline in global inflation expectations. Source: Bloomberg 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% US Treasury Note Yields 2-Year 5-Year 10-YearYield (%)0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% US Treasury Yield Curve Jun-19 Mar-19 Jun-18Yield (%)Bond Yields 11 4.13.a Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Section 2|SECTION |Section 2 |Account Profile 12 4.13.a Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Objectives Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective The performance objective of the City of Dublin is to earn a return that equals or exceeds the return on of the ICE BAML 1-5 Year Treasury and Agency Index. Investment Objectives The investment objectives of the City of Dublin are first,to provide safety of principal;second,to provide adequate liquidity to meet all requirements which might be reasonably anticipated;third,to attain a market average rate of return on its investments throughout economic cycles;and fourth,to be diversified to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual financial institutions. Strategy In order to achieve this objective,the portfolio invests in high quality fixed income instruments consistent with the City's investment policy and California Government Code. As of June 30, 2019 13 4.13.a Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Compliance As of June 30, 2019 Category Standard Comment Treasury Issues No limitations Complies Agency Issues 35% max per issuer; 25% max callables Complies Supranationals "AA" rated or equivalent by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; USD denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued by: IBRD, IFC, IADB Complies Municipal Securities "A" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 5% max per issuer Complies Medium Term Notes "A" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; Issued by corporations organized and operating within the U.S. or by depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating within the U.S.Complies Banker’s Acceptances "A-1" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 40% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 20% max amount invested in BA with any one financial institution in combination with any other debt from that financial institution; 180 days max maturity Complies Commercial Paper "A-1" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 25% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 20% max amount invested in CP of any one issuer in combination with any other debt from that issuer; 270 days max maturity Complies Negotiable Certificates of Deposit "A" or better long term debt rating and/or "A-1" or higher short term rating by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 20% max amount invested in NCDs with any one financial institution in combination with any other debt from that financial institution. Complies Time Deposits/ Certificates of Deposit 10% max; Collateralized/FDIC Insured; 1 year max maturity Complies Asset-Backed and Mortgage-Backed Securities (ABS/MBS) "AA" rated or higher by a NRSRO; "A" rated or higher for the issuer's debt by a NRSRO; 20% maximum; 5% max per issue Complies Money Market Mutual Funds and Mutual Funds Highest rating or "AAA" rated by two NRSROs; SEC registered adviser with AUM >$500 million and experience greater than 5 years; 10% per one Mutual Fund; 20% maximum in Money Market Mutual Funds; 20% maximum combined of total portfolio in these securities Complies LAIF Max program limit Complies CAMP Not used by adviser Complies Max Per Issuer 5% (except US Government, Agencies and its instrumentalities including agency backed-mortgage pools, Money Market Mutual Funds)Complies Maximum Maturity 5 years Complies City of Dublin Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and with the City's investment policy. 14 4.13.a Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Portfolio Characteristics City of Dublin 6/30/2019 3/31/2019 Benchmark*Portfolio Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs)2.65 2.67 2.58 Average Modified Duration 2.53 2.42 2.34 Average Purchase Yield n/a 2.22%2.17% Average Market Yield 1.78%1.98%2.44% Average Quality**AAA AA/Aa1 AA/Aa1 Total Market Value 190,536,677 187,225,366 *ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index **Benchmark is a blended rating of S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively. As of June 30, 2019 15 4.13.a Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) City of Dublin Sector Distribution ABS 6.0% Agency 33.4% Commercial Paper 2.0% Foreign Corporate 2.1% Money Market Fund FI 0.2% Supranational 2.4% US Corporate 23.6% US Treasury 30.4% June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019 ABS 6.5% Agency 32.0% Commercial Paper 2.0% Foreign Corporate 2.0% Money Market Fund FI 0.2% Supranational 2.4% US Corporate 22.5% US Treasury 32.4% As of June 30, 2019 16 4.13.a Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio Government of United States US Treasury 30.43% Federal Home Loan Bank Agency 15.35% Federal National Mortgage Association Agency 12.83% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Agency 5.22% MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Commercial Paper 1.99% Honda ABS ABS 1.91% John Deere ABS ABS 1.89% Honda Motor Corporation US Corporate 1.51% Bank of America Corp US Corporate 1.32% Inter-American Dev Bank Supranational 1.32% Apple Inc US Corporate 1.30% Toronto Dominion Holdings Foreign Corporate 1.26% Boeing Company US Corporate 1.24% JP Morgan Chase & Co US Corporate 1.22% PNC Financial Services Group US Corporate 1.22% Oracle Corp US Corporate 1.18% IBM Corp US Corporate 1.09% Charles Schwab Corp/The US Corporate 1.07% US Bancorp US Corporate 1.07% ChevronTexaco Corp US Corporate 1.07% Intl Bank Recon and Development Supranational 1.06% Bank of New York US Corporate 1.06% Chubb Corporation US Corporate 1.05% Qualcomm Inc US Corporate 1.05% Toyota ABS ABS 1.05% Berkshire Hathaway US Corporate 1.00% Microsoft US Corporate 0.97% Exxon Mobil Corp US Corporate 0.95% State Street Bank US Corporate 0.94% Deere & Company US Corporate 0.93% HSBC Holdings PLC Foreign Corporate 0.80% Wal-Mart Stores US Corporate 0.76% Nissan ABS ABS 0.65% General Dynamics Corp US Corporate 0.61% HSBC Holdings PLC US Corporate 0.53% American Express ABS ABS 0.52% Merck & Company US Corporate 0.40% First American Govt Oblig Fund Money Market Fund FI 0.17% TOTAL 100.00% Issuers City of Dublin –Account #10198 As of June 30, 2019 17 4.13.a Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) AAA AA A <A NR 06/30/19 4.5%72.5%18.0%0.0%5.0% 03/31/19 4.9%71.8%18.2%0.0%5.1% Source: S&P Ratings June 30, 2019 vs. March 31, 2019 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% AAA AA A <A NR 6/30/2019 3/31/2019 Quality Distribution City of Dublin As of June 30, 2019 18 4.13.a Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ City of Dublin ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Portfolio Compared to the Benchmark as of June 30, 2019 0 -0.25 0.25 -0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ Portfolio 5.2% 2.5% 10.6% 23.5% 19.4% 23.9% 14.9% 0.0% Benchmark*0.3% 0.1% 1.8% 33.6% 27.8% 22.1% 14.3% 0.0% *ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Duration Distribution City of Dublin As of June 30, 2019 19 4.13.a Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 12 months 2 years 3 years 5 years 10 years Since Inception City of Dublin ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Total Rate of Return Annualized Since Inception 10/31/2013 Annualized TOTAL RATE OF RETURN 3 months 12 months 2 years 3 years 5 years 10 years Since Inception City of Dublin 1.77%4.86%2.38%1.59%1.64%N/A 1.54% ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index 1.82%4.87%2.24%1.32%1.50%N/A 1.39% *ICE BAML 1-3 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index to 12/31/2014 Total rate of return: A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time.It is the internal rate of return,which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value;it includes interest earnings,realized and unrealized gains and losses in the portfolio. Investment Performance City of Dublin As of June 30, 2019 20 4.13.a Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Portfolio Characteristics City of Dublin Reporting Account 6/30/2019 Portfolio 3/31/2019 Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs)0.00 0.00 Modified Duration 0.00 0.00 Average Purchase Yield 2.43%2.52% Average Market Yield 2.43%2.52% Average Quality*AAA/NR AAA/NR Total Market Value 99,297,122 97,524,685 *Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s, respectively. As of June 30, 2019 21 4.13.a Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) City of Dublin Reporting Account Sector Distribution LAIF 49.4% Local Gov Investment Pool 50.6% June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019 LAIF 50.0% Local Gov Investment Pool 50.0% As of June 30, 2019 22 4.13.a Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio CAMP Local Gov Investment Pool 50.60% Local Agency Investment Fund LAIF 49.40% TOTAL 100.00% Issuers City of Dublin Reporting Account –Account #10219 As of June 30, 2019 23 4.13.a Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) SECTION |Section 3 |Consolidated Information 24 4.13.a Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Portfolio Characteristics City of Dublin Consolidated 6/30/2019 3/31/2019 Portfolio Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs)1.76 1.70 Modified Duration 1.59 1.54 Average Purchase Yield 2.29%2.29% Average Market Yield 2.13%2.47% Average Quality*AA+/Aa1 AA+/Aa1 Total Market Value 289,833,799 284,750,051 * Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively. As of June 30, 2019 25 4.13.a Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) City of Dublin Consolidated Sector Distribution ABS 4.0% Agency 22.0% Commercial Paper 1.3% Foreign Corporate 1.4% LAIF 16.9% Local Gov Investment Pool 17.3% Money Market Fund FI 0.1% Supranational 1.6% US Corporate 15.5% US Treasury 20.0% June 30, 2019 March 31, 2019 ABS 4.3% Agency 21.1% Commercial Paper 1.3% Foreign Corporate 1.3% LAIF 17.1% Local Gov Investment Pool 17.1% Money Market Fund FI 0.1% Supranational 1.6% US Corporate 14.8% US Treasury 21.3% As of June 30, 2019 26 4.13.a Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) SECTION |Section 4 |Portfolio Holdings 27 4.13.a Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration ABS 43814QAC2 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-2 A3 1.390% Due 04/15/2020 3,028.16 05/24/2016 1.09% 3,028.10 3,028.15 99.93 3.41% 3,026.15 1.87 0.00% (2.00) Aaa / NR AAA 0.79 0.03 89238BAB8 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A 2.100% Due 10/15/2020 658,655.63 01/23/2018 1.54% 658,588.31 658,623.47 99.93 2.49% 658,187.24 614.75 0.35% (436.23) Aaa / AAA NR 1.30 0.19 43814WAB1 HAROT 2019-1 A2 2.750% Due 09/20/2021 1,625,000.00 02/19/2019 2.77% 1,624,895.35 1,624,909.21 100.36 2.35% 1,630,863.00 1,613.72 0.86% 5,953.79 NR / AAA AAA 2.23 0.87 47788BAD6 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 1.820% Due 10/15/2021 259,367.81 07/11/2017 1.65% 259,348.83 259,357.56 99.74 2.27% 258,700.93 209.80 0.14% (656.63) Aaa / NR AAA 2.30 0.58 89239AAB9 Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-A A2A 2.830% Due 10/15/2021 1,335,000.00 02/05/2019 2.85% 1,334,878.78 1,334,895.94 100.43 2.26% 1,340,709.80 1,679.13 0.70% 5,813.86 Aaa / AAA NR 2.30 0.72 47789JAB2 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 2.850% Due 12/15/2021 1,205,000.00 03/05/2019 2.87% 1,204,945.05 1,204,951.05 100.59 2.20% 1,212,092.63 1,526.33 0.64% 7,141.58 Aaa / NR AAA 2.46 0.88 47788CAC6 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-B A4 2.660% Due 04/18/2022 515,000.00 02/21/2018 2.68% 514,962.97 514,974.94 100.46 2.21% 517,358.70 608.84 0.27% 2,383.76 Aaa / NR AAA 2.80 0.97 43814UAG4 Honda Auto Receivables 2018-2 A3 3.010% Due 05/18/2022 610,000.00 05/22/2018 2.25% 609,986.70 609,990.34 101.25 2.11% 617,594.50 663.04 0.32% 7,604.16 NR / AAA AAA 2.88 1.34 43815HAC1 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3 2.950% Due 08/22/2022 1,360,000.00 08/21/2018 2.40% 1,359,813.41 1,359,852.78 101.25 2.10% 1,377,005.44 1,114.44 0.72% 17,152.66 Aaa / NR AAA 3.15 1.44 02582JHE3 American Express Credit 2017-3 A 1.770% Due 11/15/2022 1,000,000.00 06/28/2018 2.29% 980,625.00 985,069.14 99.66 2.22% 996,563.00 786.67 0.52% 11,493.86 NR / AAA AAA 3.38 0.77 47788EAC2 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 3.080% Due 11/15/2022 1,585,000.00 07/18/2018 3.10% 1,584,879.86 1,584,905.89 101.35 2.13% 1,606,364.18 2,169.69 0.84% 21,458.29 Aaa / NR AAA 3.38 1.38 65479GAD1 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2018-B A3 3.060% Due 03/15/2023 1,220,000.00 07/17/2018 3.08% 1,219,960.47 1,219,968.43 101.62 2.13% 1,239,728.60 1,659.20 0.65% 19,760.17 Aaa / AAA NR 3.71 1.70 TOTAL ABS 11,376,051.60 2.66% 11,355,912.83 11,360,526.90 2.21% 11,458,194.17 12,647.48 6.02% 97,667.27 Aaa / AAA Aaa 2.80 1.06 Agency 3135G0ZG1 FNMA Note 1.750% Due 09/12/2019 2,500,000.00 10/28/2014 1.68% 2,508,350.00 2,500,342.64 99.90 2.26% 2,497,425.00 13,246.53 1.32% (2,917.64) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.20 0.20 3137EADM8 FHLMC Note 1.250% Due 10/02/2019 2,500,000.00 12/18/2015 1.64% 2,464,700.00 2,497,622.81 99.76 2.20% 2,493,937.50 7,725.69 1.31% (3,685.31) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.26 0.25 3135G0A78 FNMA Note 1.625% Due 01/21/2020 2,000,000.00 04/07/2015 1.44% 2,016,580.00 2,001,933.86 99.74 2.09% 1,994,828.00 14,444.44 1.05% (7,105.86) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.56 0.55 As of June 30, 2019 28 4.13.a Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 313383HU8 FHLB Note 1.750% Due 06/12/2020 2,000,000.00 10/08/2015 1.46% 2,026,040.00 2,005,290.33 99.75 2.02% 1,994,960.00 1,847.22 1.05% (10,330.33) Aaa / AA+ NR 0.95 0.94 3137EAEK1 FHLMC Note 1.875% Due 11/17/2020 2,400,000.00 11/28/2017 1.91% 2,397,336.00 2,398,758.93 99.97 1.90% 2,399,244.00 5,500.00 1.26% 485.07 Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.39 1.35 3135G0F73 FNMA Note 1.500% Due 11/30/2020 2,500,000.00 12/04/2015 1.87% 2,455,750.00 2,487,405.77 99.51 1.85% 2,487,737.50 3,229.17 1.31% 331.73 Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.42 1.39 3130A7CV5 FHLB Note 1.375% Due 02/18/2021 3,470,000.00 Various 1.45% 3,457,221.20 3,465,795.77 99.27 1.83% 3,444,523.26 17,627.12 1.82% (21,272.51) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.64 1.60 3135G0J20 FNMA Note 1.375% Due 02/26/2021 5,000,000.00 Various 1.29% 5,018,675.00 5,006,735.25 99.23 1.85% 4,961,550.00 23,871.52 2.62% (45,185.25) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.66 1.62 313379RB7 FHLB Note 1.875% Due 06/11/2021 3,000,000.00 08/30/2017 1.67% 3,022,620.00 3,011,654.22 100.03 1.86% 3,000,795.00 3,125.00 1.58% (10,859.22) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.95 1.90 3130A8QS5 FHLB Note 1.125% Due 07/14/2021 2,500,000.00 07/25/2016 1.28% 2,481,475.00 2,492,402.09 98.75 1.75% 2,468,845.00 13,046.88 1.30% (23,557.09) Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.04 1.99 3137EAEC9 FHLMC Note 1.125% Due 08/12/2021 3,000,000.00 Various 1.33% 2,971,215.00 2,987,638.26 98.58 1.81% 2,957,352.00 13,031.26 1.56% (30,286.26) Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.12 2.07 3135G0Q89 FNMA Note 1.375% Due 10/07/2021 2,000,000.00 10/06/2016 1.45% 1,992,924.00 1,996,787.51 99.00 1.82% 1,980,098.00 6,416.67 1.04% (16,689.51) Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.27 2.22 3135G0S38 FNMA Note 2.000% Due 01/05/2022 2,500,000.00 01/30/2017 2.04% 2,495,475.00 2,497,689.74 100.52 1.79% 2,513,115.00 24,444.44 1.33% 15,425.26 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.52 2.42 313378CR0 FHLB Note 2.250% Due 03/11/2022 2,000,000.00 06/19/2017 1.86% 2,035,280.00 2,020,124.94 101.23 1.78% 2,024,650.00 13,750.00 1.07% 4,525.06 Aaa / AA+ NR 2.70 2.59 3135G0T45 FNMA Note 1.875% Due 04/05/2022 3,250,000.00 05/05/2017 1.99% 3,232,125.00 3,239,940.95 100.18 1.81% 3,255,824.00 14,557.29 1.72% 15,883.05 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.77 2.67 3135G0T94 FNMA Note 2.375% Due 01/19/2023 2,500,000.00 03/28/2018 2.70% 2,463,675.00 2,473,164.57 101.97 1.80% 2,549,137.50 26,718.75 1.35% 75,972.93 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.56 3.36 313383QR5 FHLB Note 3.250% Due 06/09/2023 1,500,000.00 08/28/2018 2.87% 1,525,005.00 1,520,620.17 105.25 1.86% 1,578,772.50 2,979.17 0.83% 58,152.33 Aaa / AA+ NR 3.95 3.70 3137EAEN5 FHLMC Note 2.750% Due 06/19/2023 2,000,000.00 07/16/2018 2.88% 1,988,360.00 1,990,619.38 103.54 1.82% 2,070,790.00 1,833.33 1.09% 80,170.62 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.97 3.75 313383YJ4 FHLB Note 3.375% Due 09/08/2023 5,000,000.00 Various 2.90% 5,102,615.00 5,091,497.41 106.35 1.79% 5,317,600.00 52,968.76 2.82% 226,102.59 Aaa / AA+ NR 4.19 3.88 3130A0F70 FHLB Note 3.375% Due 12/08/2023 5,000,000.00 Various 2.73% 5,147,870.00 5,133,443.17 106.39 1.87% 5,319,355.00 10,781.25 2.80% 185,911.83 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.44 4.12 3135G0V34 FNMA Note 2.500% Due 02/05/2024 2,000,000.00 02/27/2019 2.58% 1,992,340.00 1,992,862.56 103.00 1.82% 2,060,098.00 19,861.11 1.09% 67,235.44 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.61 4.30 As of June 30, 2019 29 4.13.a Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 3130A1XJ2 FHLB Note 2.875% Due 06/14/2024 3,795,000.00 Various 1.96% 3,958,639.85 3,957,473.08 104.71 1.87% 3,973,869.74 5,152.24 2.09% 16,396.66 Aaa / AA+ NR 4.96 4.61 TOTAL Agency 62,415,000.00 1.98% 62,754,271.05 62,769,803.41 1.88% 63,344,507.00 296,157.84 33.40% 574,703.59 Aaa / AA+ Aaa 2.62 2.49 Commercial Paper 62479MVK6 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Discount CP 2.350% Due 08/19/2019 3,800,000.00 06/20/2019 2.39% 3,785,116.67 3,787,845.28 99.68 2.39% 3,787,845.28 0.00 1.99% 0.00 P-1 / A-1 NR 0.14 0.14 TOTAL Commercial Paper 3,800,000.00 2.39% 3,785,116.67 3,787,845.28 2.39% 3,787,845.28 0.00 1.99% 0.00 P-1 / A-1 NR 0.14 0.14 Foreign Corporate 404280BF5 HSBC Holdings PLC Note 2.650% Due 01/05/2022 1,500,000.00 01/12/2018 2.89% 1,486,320.00 1,491,323.73 100.39 2.49% 1,505,824.50 19,433.33 0.80% 14,500.77 A2 / A AA- 2.52 2.39 89114QCB2 Toronto Dominion Bank Note 3.250% Due 03/11/2024 2,300,000.00 03/26/2019 2.95% 2,331,234.00 2,329,594.65 103.52 2.45% 2,380,989.90 22,840.28 1.26% 51,395.25 Aa3 / A AA- 4.70 4.31 TOTAL Foreign Corporate 3,800,000.00 2.93% 3,817,554.00 3,820,918.38 2.47% 3,886,814.40 42,273.61 2.06% 65,896.02 A1 / A AA- 3.85 3.56 Money Market Fund FI 31846V203 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 317,900.01 Various 1.99% 317,900.01 317,900.01 1.00 1.99% 317,900.01 0.00 0.17% 0.00 Aaa / AAA AAA 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Money Market Fund FI 317,900.01 1.99% 317,900.01 317,900.01 1.99% 317,900.01 0.00 0.17% 0.00 Aaa / AAA Aaa 0.00 0.00 Supranational 459058FY4 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note 2.000% Due 01/26/2022 2,000,000.00 10/26/2017 2.12% 1,990,320.00 1,994,125.76 100.53 1.79% 2,010,630.00 17,222.22 1.06% 16,504.24 Aaa / NR AAA 2.58 2.48 4581X0CZ9 Inter-American Dev Bank Note 1.750% Due 09/14/2022 2,500,000.00 11/28/2017 2.18% 2,451,675.00 2,467,645.18 99.85 1.80% 2,496,305.00 13,003.47 1.32% 28,659.82 NR / NR AAA 3.21 3.09 TOTAL Supranational 4,500,000.00 2.15% 4,441,995.00 4,461,770.94 1.79% 4,506,935.00 30,225.69 2.38% 45,164.06 Aaa / NR Aaa 2.93 2.81 US Corporate 02665WAH4 American Honda Finance Note 2.250% Due 08/15/2019 1,800,000.00 Various 2.08% 1,812,627.00 1,800,365.91 99.93 2.78% 1,798,749.00 15,300.00 0.95% (1,616.91) A2 / A NR 0.13 0.12 As of June 30, 2019 30 4.13.a Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 06406HCW7 Bank of New York Callable Note Cont 8/11/2019 2.300% Due 09/11/2019 750,000.00 04/22/2015 1.82% 764,722.50 750,385.21 100.00 2.27% 750,020.25 5,270.83 0.40% (364.96) A1 / A AA- 0.20 0.11 68389XAX3 Oracle Corp Note 2.250% Due 10/08/2019 1,250,000.00 Various 1.73% 1,272,172.50 1,251,701.19 100.01 2.21% 1,250,086.25 6,484.38 0.66% (1,614.94) A1 / AA- A 0.27 0.27 40428HPN6 HSBC USA Inc Note 2.375% Due 11/13/2019 1,000,000.00 11/07/2014 2.32% 1,002,440.00 1,000,180.39 99.97 2.44% 999,725.00 3,166.67 0.53% (455.39) A2 / A AA- 0.37 0.37 46625HKA7 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont 12/23/2019 2.250% Due 01/23/2020 1,800,000.00 Various 2.37% 1,790,172.00 1,798,827.49 99.97 2.30% 1,799,449.20 17,775.00 0.95% 621.71 A2 / A- AA- 0.57 0.55 747525AD5 Qualcomm Inc Note 2.250% Due 05/20/2020 2,000,000.00 Various 2.22% 2,001,128.80 2,000,507.67 99.97 2.29% 1,999,348.00 5,125.00 1.05% (1,159.67) A2 / A- NR 0.89 0.87 24422ESY6 John Deere Capital Corp Note 2.375% Due 07/14/2020 1,000,000.00 09/15/2016 1.69% 1,025,153.50 1,006,843.63 100.14 2.24% 1,001,390.00 11,017.36 0.53% (5,453.63) A2 / A A 1.04 1.01 00440EAT4 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 10/3/2020 2.300% Due 11/03/2020 2,000,000.00 Various 2.25% 2,003,489.00 2,001,234.22 100.04 2.26% 2,000,856.00 7,411.11 1.05% (378.22) A3 / A A 1.35 1.23 24422ETF6 John Deere Capital Corp Note 2.550% Due 01/08/2021 750,000.00 Various 2.42% 753,733.15 751,406.37 100.59 2.15% 754,446.00 9,190.62 0.40% 3,039.63 A2 / A A 1.53 1.47 30231GAV4 Exxon Mobil Corp Callable Note Cont 2/1/2021 2.222% Due 03/01/2021 1,800,000.00 Various 2.06% 1,813,024.00 1,804,558.40 100.28 2.05% 1,804,987.80 13,332.00 0.95% 429.40 Aaa / AA+ NR 1.67 1.62 369550BE7 General Dynamics Corp Note 3.000% Due 05/11/2021 1,130,000.00 05/08/2018 3.24% 1,122,146.50 1,125,127.39 101.62 2.11% 1,148,296.96 4,708.33 0.61% 23,169.57 A2 / A+ NR 1.87 1.80 166764BG4 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 4/15/2021 2.100% Due 05/16/2021 1,000,000.00 04/20/2017 2.09% 1,000,190.00 1,000,087.82 100.09 2.05% 1,000,876.00 2,625.00 0.53% 788.18 Aa2 / AA NR 1.88 1.75 857477AV5 State Street Bank Note 1.950% Due 05/19/2021 1,800,000.00 Various 1.91% 1,802,989.00 1,801,255.20 99.74 2.09% 1,795,309.20 4,095.01 0.94% (5,946.00) A1 / A AA- 1.89 1.84 594918BP8 Microsoft Callable Note Cont 7/8/2021 1.550% Due 08/08/2021 1,850,000.00 Various 1.59% 1,846,471.85 1,848,494.19 99.15 1.96% 1,834,249.10 11,390.35 0.97% (14,245.09) Aaa / AAA AA+ 2.11 2.05 68389XBK0 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont 8/01/21 1.900% Due 09/15/2021 1,000,000.00 06/28/2018 3.08% 964,080.00 975,308.82 99.49 2.14% 994,938.00 5,594.44 0.53% 19,629.18 A1 / AA- A 2.21 2.14 91159HHP8 US Bancorp Callable Cont 12/23/2021 2.625% Due 01/24/2022 2,000,000.00 05/23/2017 2.35% 2,023,280.00 2,012,614.64 101.07 2.18% 2,021,380.00 22,895.83 1.07% 8,765.36 A1 / A+ AA- 2.57 2.37 808513AT2 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 12/25/2022 2.650% Due 01/25/2023 2,000,000.00 05/21/2019 2.74% 1,993,920.00 1,994,096.56 101.24 2.28% 2,024,878.00 22,966.67 1.07% 30,781.44 A2 / A A 3.58 3.28 44932HAH6 IBM Credit Corp Note 3.000% Due 02/06/2023 2,000,000.00 02/26/2018 3.09% 1,991,340.00 1,993,682.62 102.31 2.33% 2,046,154.00 24,166.67 1.09% 52,471.38 A1 / A A 3.61 3.36 As of June 30, 2019 31 4.13.a Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 084670BR8 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont 1/15/2023 2.750% Due 03/15/2023 1,865,000.00 Various 3.34% 1,818,500.75 1,827,096.36 101.62 2.27% 1,895,130.94 15,101.32 1.00% 68,034.58 Aa2 / AA A+ 3.71 3.34 58933YAF2 Merck & Co Note 2.800% Due 05/18/2023 740,000.00 10/26/2018 3.41% 720,996.80 723,788.36 102.41 2.15% 757,816.24 2,474.89 0.40% 34,027.88 A1 / AA A+ 3.88 3.66 46625HRL6 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont 3/18/2023 2.700% Due 05/18/2023 500,000.00 12/20/2018 3.74% 479,055.00 481,519.88 101.03 2.41% 505,126.00 1,612.50 0.27% 23,606.12 A2 / A- AA- 3.88 3.51 69353RFL7 PNC Bank Callable Note Cont 5/9/2023 3.500% Due 06/08/2023 2,210,000.00 Various 3.53% 2,206,955.80 2,207,598.36 104.55 2.26% 2,310,561.63 4,941.80 1.22% 102,963.27 A2 / A NR 3.94 3.60 097023BQ7 Boeing Co Callable Note Cont 4/15/2023 1.875% Due 06/15/2023 2,400,000.00 02/13/2019 2.98% 2,293,368.00 2,302,540.65 98.16 2.36% 2,355,876.00 2,000.00 1.24% 53,335.35 A2 / A A 3.96 3.78 166764AH3 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 3/24/2023 3.191% Due 06/24/2023 1,000,000.00 11/08/2018 3.59% 983,170.00 985,468.63 103.79 2.13% 1,037,875.00 620.47 0.55% 52,406.37 Aa2 / AA NR 3.99 3.51 931142EK5 Wal-Mart Stores Callable Note Cont 5/26/2023 3.400% Due 06/26/2023 1,380,000.00 Various 3.41% 1,379,641.30 1,379,713.83 105.10 2.03% 1,450,418.64 651.66 0.76% 70,704.81 Aa2 / AA AA 3.99 3.66 02665WCJ8 American Honda Finance Note 3.450% Due 07/14/2023 1,000,000.00 Various 3.54% 996,275.00 996,747.47 104.30 2.33% 1,042,965.00 16,004.17 0.56% 46,217.53 A2 / A NR 4.04 3.71 06406RAJ6 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Note 3.450% Due 08/11/2023 1,200,000.00 08/24/2018 3.42% 1,201,836.00 1,201,524.42 104.28 2.35% 1,251,339.60 16,100.00 0.67% 49,815.18 A1 / A AA- 4.12 3.78 06051GHF9 Bank of America Corp Callable Note 1X 3/5/2023 3.550% Due 03/05/2024 2,400,000.00 Various 3.15% 2,434,650.00 2,432,569.05 103.67 2.50% 2,488,029.60 27,453.33 1.32% 55,460.55 A2 / A- A+ 4.68 3.41 037833CU2 Apple Inc Callable Note Cont 3/11/2024 2.850% Due 05/11/2024 2,400,000.00 05/17/2019 2.72% 2,414,208.00 2,413,876.26 103.01 2.17% 2,472,273.60 9,500.00 1.30% 58,397.34 Aa1 / AA+ NR 4.87 4.37 TOTAL US Corporate 44,025,000.00 2.67% 43,911,736.45 43,869,120.99 2.25% 44,592,551.01 288,975.41 23.56% 723,430.02 A1 / A+ A+ 2.66 2.41 US Treasury 912828H52 US Treasury Note 1.250% Due 01/31/2020 3,500,000.00 Various 1.53% 3,453,755.22 3,494,488.77 99.51 2.10% 3,482,773.01 18,249.30 1.84% (11,715.76) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.59 0.58 912828XE5 US Treasury Note 1.500% Due 05/31/2020 3,000,000.00 Various 1.67% 2,976,025.68 2,995,523.89 99.54 2.01% 2,986,173.00 3,811.47 1.57% (9,350.89) Aaa / AA+ AAA 0.92 0.91 912828XM7 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due 07/31/2020 1,500,000.00 09/08/2015 1.52% 1,507,622.21 1,501,689.09 99.67 1.93% 1,495,020.00 10,167.47 0.79% (6,669.09) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.09 1.06 912828L99 US Treasury Note 1.375% Due 10/31/2020 5,000,000.00 Various 1.69% 4,927,376.14 4,980,200.63 99.35 1.87% 4,967,580.00 11,582.88 2.61% (12,620.63) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.34 1.31 912828N89 US Treasury Note 1.375% Due 01/31/2021 2,000,000.00 03/15/2016 1.49% 1,988,834.83 1,996,365.99 99.30 1.83% 1,985,938.00 11,470.99 1.05% (10,427.99) Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.59 1.55 As of June 30, 2019 32 4.13.a Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Holdings Report City of Dublin -Account #10198 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration 912828P87 US Treasury Note 1.125% Due 02/28/2021 3,000,000.00 12/28/2018 2.54% 2,911,171.88 2,931,636.08 98.87 1.81% 2,966,133.00 11,280.57 1.56% 34,496.92 Aaa / AA+ AAA 1.67 1.64 912828T34 US Treasury Note 1.125% Due 09/30/2021 1,500,000.00 Various 1.66% 1,463,144.24 1,482,851.44 98.68 1.73% 1,480,195.50 4,241.80 0.78% (2,655.94) Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.25 2.20 912828U65 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 11/30/2021 2,500,000.00 12/28/2016 2.06% 2,464,461.50 2,482,537.29 100.03 1.74% 2,500,780.00 3,705.60 1.31% 18,242.71 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.42 2.35 912828V72 US Treasury Note 1.875% Due 01/31/2022 1,500,000.00 02/27/2017 1.84% 1,502,407.37 1,501,265.28 100.35 1.74% 1,505,274.00 11,731.70 0.80% 4,008.72 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.59 2.50 912828J76 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 03/31/2022 3,000,000.00 04/25/2017 1.85% 2,985,830.37 2,992,096.50 100.06 1.73% 3,001,875.00 13,196.72 1.58% 9,778.50 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.75 2.66 912828WZ9 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 04/30/2022 2,750,000.00 05/23/2017 1.84% 2,738,944.75 2,743,656.42 100.09 1.72% 2,752,362.25 8,152.32 1.45% 8,705.83 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.84 2.75 912828XR6 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 05/31/2022 1,500,000.00 06/28/2017 1.81% 1,496,020.65 1,497,641.62 100.07 1.73% 1,500,996.00 2,223.36 0.79% 3,354.38 Aaa / AA+ AAA 2.92 2.83 912828XW5 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 06/30/2022 3,000,000.00 07/25/2017 1.86% 2,984,072.55 2,990,310.80 100.13 1.71% 3,003,750.00 142.66 1.58% 13,439.20 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.00 2.91 912828L24 US Treasury Note 1.875% Due 08/31/2022 2,000,000.00 09/27/2017 1.92% 1,995,944.20 1,997,390.12 100.45 1.73% 2,008,984.00 12,533.97 1.06% 11,593.88 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.17 3.05 912828L57 US Treasury Note 1.750% Due 09/30/2022 3,750,000.00 Various 2.02% 3,702,841.80 3,718,699.70 100.07 1.73% 3,752,636.25 16,495.90 1.98% 33,936.55 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.25 3.13 912828M49 US Treasury Note 1.875% Due 10/31/2022 1,000,000.00 01/30/2018 2.47% 973,359.38 981,287.04 100.48 1.72% 1,004,844.00 3,158.97 0.53% 23,556.96 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.34 3.21 9128284D9 US Treasury Note 2.500% Due 03/31/2023 3,750,000.00 Various 2.75% 3,706,123.05 3,716,687.77 102.79 1.73% 3,854,591.25 23,565.58 2.04% 137,903.48 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.75 3.55 912828R69 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due 05/31/2023 1,500,000.00 05/30/2018 2.67% 1,427,167.97 1,442,962.87 99.61 1.73% 1,494,082.50 2,064.55 0.79% 51,119.63 Aaa / AA+ AAA 3.92 3.77 912828U57 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 11/30/2023 5,000,000.00 Various 2.53% 4,908,242.19 4,916,304.52 101.60 1.75% 5,079,885.00 8,999.32 2.67% 163,580.48 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.42 4.20 912828V80 US Treasury Note 2.250% Due 01/31/2024 5,000,000.00 Various 2.32% 4,983,691.41 4,984,465.92 102.17 1.76% 5,108,400.00 46,926.80 2.71% 123,934.08 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.59 4.31 912828WJ5 US Treasury Note 2.500% Due 05/15/2024 1,750,000.00 06/10/2019 1.91% 1,798,261.72 1,797,725.48 103.43 1.76% 1,810,088.00 5,587.64 0.95% 12,362.52 Aaa / AA+ AAA 4.88 4.57 TOTAL US Treasury 57,500,000.00 2.03% 56,895,299.11 57,145,787.22 1.79% 57,742,360.76 229,289.57 30.43% 596,573.54 Aaa / AA+ Aaa 2.79 2.67 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 187,733,951.61 2.23% 187,279,785.12 187,533,673.13 1.98% 189,637,107.63 899,569.60 100.00% 2,103,434.50 Aa1 / AA Aaa 2.67 2.42 TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 190,536,677.23 As of June 30, 2019 33 4.13.a Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Holdings Report City of Dublin Reporting Account -Account #10219 CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield Cost Value Book Value Mkt Price Mkt YTM Market Value Accrued Int. % of Port. Gain/Loss Moody/S&P Fitch Maturity Duration LAIF 90LAIF$00 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 48,753,717.70 Various 2.41% 48,753,717.70 48,753,717.70 1.00 2.41% 48,753,717.70 297,000.14 49.40% 0.00 NR / NR NR 0.00 0.00 TOTAL LAIF 48,753,717.70 2.41% 48,753,717.70 48,753,717.70 2.41% 48,753,717.70 297,000.14 49.40% 0.00 NR / NR NR 0.00 0.00 Local Gov Investment Pool 90CAMP$00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 50,246,403.91 Various 2.45% 50,246,403.91 50,246,403.91 1.00 2.45% 50,246,403.91 0.00 50.60% 0.00 NR / AAA NR 0.00 0.00 TOTAL Local Gov Investment Pool 50,246,403.91 2.45% 50,246,403.91 50,246,403.91 2.45% 50,246,403.91 0.00 50.60% 0.00 NR / AAA NR 0.00 0.00 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 99,000,121.61 2.43% 99,000,121.61 99,000,121.61 2.43% 99,000,121.61 297,000.14 100.00% 0.00 NR / AAA NR 0.00 0.00 TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 99,297,121.75 As of June 30, 2019 34 4.13.a Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: 1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending June 30, 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of April 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 04/01/2019 31846V203 3,439.83 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%3,439.83 0.00 3,439.83 0.00 Purchase 04/02/2019 31846V203 15,625.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%15,625.00 0.00 15,625.00 0.00 Purchase 04/05/2019 31846V203 211,214.42 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%211,214.42 0.00 211,214.42 0.00 Purchase 04/05/2019 31846V203 30,468.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%30,468.75 0.00 30,468.75 0.00 Purchase 04/05/2019 912828V80 2,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.25% Due 1/31/2024 99.672 2.32%2,491,796.88 9,944.75 2,501,741.63 0.00 Purchase 04/07/2019 31846V203 13,750.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%13,750.00 0.00 13,750.00 0.00 Purchase 04/08/2019 31846V203 14,062.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%14,062.50 0.00 14,062.50 0.00 Purchase 04/12/2019 912828V80 2,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.25% Due 1/31/2024 99.676 2.32%2,491,894.53 11,032.46 2,502,926.99 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 1,475.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%1,475.00 0.00 1,475.00 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 33,976.68 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%33,976.68 0.00 33,976.68 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 23,463.84 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%23,463.84 0.00 23,463.84 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 8,557.22 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%8,557.22 0.00 8,557.22 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 1,141.59 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%1,141.59 0.00 1,141.59 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 4,068.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%4,068.17 0.00 4,068.17 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 42,401.36 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%42,401.36 0.00 42,401.36 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 3,052.66 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%3,052.66 0.00 3,052.66 0.00 Execution Time: 5/2/2019 11:37:02 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11 4.13.b Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of April 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 3,111.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%3,111.00 0.00 3,111.00 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 145,618.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%145,618.75 0.00 145,618.75 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 31846V203 3,148.37 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%3,148.37 0.00 3,148.37 0.00 Purchase 04/15/2019 90LAIF$00 303,924.21 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 1.000 2.44%303,924.21 0.00 303,924.21 0.00 Purchase 04/18/2019 31846V203 33,410.37 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%33,410.37 0.00 33,410.37 0.00 Purchase 04/18/2019 31846V203 1,530.08 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%1,530.08 0.00 1,530.08 0.00 Purchase 04/18/2019 31846V203 3,723.96 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%3,723.96 0.00 3,723.96 0.00 Purchase 04/22/2019 31846V203 20,187.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%20,187.50 0.00 20,187.50 0.00 Purchase 04/22/2019 31846V203 1,900,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%1,900,000.00 0.00 1,900,000.00 0.00 Purchase 04/22/2019 31846V203 3,343.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%3,343.33 0.00 3,343.33 0.00 Purchase 04/24/2019 06051GHF9 1,000,000.00 Bank of America Corp Callable Note 1X 3/5/2023 3.55% Due 3/5/2024 101.078 3.25%1,010,780.00 4,831.94 1,015,611.94 0.00 Purchase 04/30/2019 31846V203 92,146.25 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%92,146.25 0.00 92,146.25 0.00 Purchase 04/30/2019 90CAMP$00 110,342.65 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2.59%110,342.65 0.00 110,342.65 0.00 Subtotal 9,027,183.49 9,021,654.90 25,809.15 9,047,464.05 0.00 Execution Time: 5/2/2019 11:37:02 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12 4.13.b Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of April 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Security Contribution 04/19/2019 90CAMP$00 17,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 17,000,000.00 0.00 17,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 17,000,000.00 17,000,000.00 0.00 17,000,000.00 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 26,027,183.49 26,021,654.90 25,809.15 26,047,464.05 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 04/05/2019 912828G95 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due 12/31/2019 99.422 2.42%1,491,328.13 6,396.75 1,497,724.88 -9,972.80 Sale 04/05/2019 912828T34 1,250,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.125% Due 9/30/2021 97.203 2.29%1,215,039.06 192.11 1,215,231.17 -19,157.98 Sale 04/12/2019 3137EADG1 1,000,000.00 FHLMC Note 1.75% Due 5/30/2019 99.906 2.44%999,060.00 6,416.67 1,005,476.67 -1,537.80 Sale 04/12/2019 31846V203 504,451.78 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%504,451.78 0.00 504,451.78 0.00 Sale 04/12/2019 912828H52 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.25% Due 1/31/2020 99.055 2.44%990,546.88 2,451.66 992,998.54 -7,289.83 Sale 04/24/2019 31846V203 1,015,611.94 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.05%1,015,611.94 0.00 1,015,611.94 0.00 Subtotal 6,270,063.72 6,216,037.79 15,457.19 6,231,494.98 -37,958.41 Paydown 04/15/2019 02582JHE3 0.00 American Express Credit 2017-3 A 1.77% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 1,475.00 1,475.00 0.00 Paydown 04/15/2019 43814QAC2 33,862.82 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-2 A3 1.39% Due 4/15/2020 100.000 33,862.82 113.86 33,976.68 0.00 Paydown 04/15/2019 47788BAB0 23,432.79 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A2A 1.59% Due 4/15/2020 100.000 23,432.79 31.05 23,463.84 0.00 Paydown 04/15/2019 47788BAD6 8,071.89 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 1.82% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 8,071.89 485.33 8,557.22 0.00 Execution Time: 5/2/2019 11:37:02 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13 4.13.b Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of April 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Paydown 04/15/2019 47788CAC6 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-B A4 2.66% Due 4/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,141.59 1,141.59 0.00 Paydown 04/15/2019 47788EAC2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 3.08% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 4,068.17 4,068.17 0.00 Paydown 04/15/2019 47788MAC4 42,348.65 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-A A3 1.36% Due 4/15/2020 100.000 42,348.65 52.71 42,401.36 0.00 Paydown 04/15/2019 47789JAB2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 2.85% Due 12/15/2021 100.000 0.00 3,052.66 3,052.66 0.00 Paydown 04/15/2019 65479GAD1 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2018-B A3 3.06% Due 3/15/2023 100.000 0.00 3,111.00 3,111.00 0.00 Paydown 04/15/2019 89238BAB8 143,717.77 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A 2.1% Due 10/15/2020 100.000 143,717.77 1,900.98 145,618.75 0.00 Paydown 04/15/2019 89239AAB9 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-A A2A 2.83% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 0.00 3,148.37 3,148.37 0.00 Paydown 04/18/2019 43814PAB6 33,362.60 Honda Auto Receivables Owner T 17-3 A2 1.57% Due 1/21/2020 100.000 33,362.60 47.77 33,410.37 0.00 Paydown 04/18/2019 43814UAG4 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables 2018-2 A3 3.01% Due 5/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,530.08 1,530.08 0.00 Paydown 04/18/2019 43814WAB1 0.00 HAROT 2019-1 A2 2.75% Due 9/20/2021 100.000 0.00 3,723.96 3,723.96 0.00 Paydown 04/22/2019 43815HAC1 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3 2.95% Due 8/22/2022 100.000 0.00 3,343.33 3,343.33 0.00 Subtotal 284,796.52 284,796.52 27,225.86 312,022.38 0.00 Maturity 04/22/2019 94974BFU9 1,900,000.00 Wells Fargo Corp Note 2.125% Due 4/22/2019 100.000 1,900,000.00 0.00 1,900,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 1,900,000.00 1,900,000.00 0.00 1,900,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 04/12/2019 90CAMP$00 880,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 880,000.00 0.00 880,000.00 0.00 Execution Time: 5/2/2019 11:37:02 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14 4.13.b Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of April 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Security Withdrawal 04/25/2019 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 Security Withdrawal 04/26/2019 90CAMP$00 4,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 4,000,000.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 4,880,104.17 4,880,104.17 0.00 4,880,104.17 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 13,334,964.41 13,280,938.48 42,683.05 13,323,621.53 -37,958.41 OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 04/02/2019 3137EADM8 2,500,000.00 FHLMC Note 1.25% Due 10/2/2019 0.000 15,625.00 0.00 15,625.00 0.00 Interest 04/05/2019 3135G0T45 3,250,000.00 FNMA Note 1.875% Due 4/5/2022 0.000 30,468.75 0.00 30,468.75 0.00 Interest 04/07/2019 3135G0Q89 2,000,000.00 FNMA Note 1.375% Due 10/7/2021 0.000 13,750.00 0.00 13,750.00 0.00 Interest 04/08/2019 68389XAX3 1,250,000.00 Oracle Corp Note 2.25% Due 10/8/2019 0.000 14,062.50 0.00 14,062.50 0.00 Interest 04/22/2019 94974BFU9 1,900,000.00 Wells Fargo Corp Note 2.125% Due 4/22/2019 0.000 20,187.50 0.00 20,187.50 0.00 Interest 04/30/2019 713448CS5 1,330,000.00 PepsiCo Inc Callable Note Cont 3/30/2020 1.85% Due 4/30/2020 0.000 12,302.50 0.00 12,302.50 0.00 Interest 04/30/2019 912828K58 1,750,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.375% Due 4/30/2020 0.000 12,031.25 0.00 12,031.25 0.00 Interest 04/30/2019 912828L99 5,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.375% Due 10/31/2020 0.000 34,375.00 0.00 34,375.00 0.00 Interest 04/30/2019 912828M49 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.875% Due 10/31/2022 0.000 9,375.00 0.00 9,375.00 0.00 Interest 04/30/2019 912828WZ9 2,750,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due 4/30/2022 0.000 24,062.50 0.00 24,062.50 0.00 Subtotal 22,730,000.00 186,240.00 0.00 186,240.00 0.00 Execution Time: 5/2/2019 11:37:02 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 15 4.13.b Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of April 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss OTHER TRANSACTIONS Dividend 04/01/2019 31846V203 380,177.20 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 0.000 3,439.83 0.00 3,439.83 0.00 Dividend 04/15/2019 90LAIF$00 4,356,510,460.26 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 0.000 303,924.21 0.00 303,924.21 0.00 Dividend 04/30/2019 90CAMP$00 60,908,751.46 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 0.000 110,342.65 0.00 110,342.65 0.00 Subtotal 4,417,799,388.92 417,706.69 0.00 417,706.69 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 4,440,529,388.92 603,946.69 0.00 603,946.69 0.00 Execution Time: 5/2/2019 11:37:02 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 16 4.13.b Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of May 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 05/01/2019 31846V203 1,364.78 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%1,364.78 0.00 1,364.78 0.00 Purchase 05/03/2019 31846V203 23,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%23,000.00 0.00 23,000.00 0.00 Purchase 05/11/2019 31846V203 16,950.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%16,950.00 0.00 16,950.00 0.00 Purchase 05/13/2019 31846V203 11,875.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%11,875.00 0.00 11,875.00 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 1,475.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%1,475.00 0.00 1,475.00 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 31,507.09 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%31,507.09 0.00 31,507.09 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 31,888.63 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%31,888.63 0.00 31,888.63 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 1,141.59 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%1,141.59 0.00 1,141.59 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 4,068.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%4,068.17 0.00 4,068.17 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 4,163.74 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%4,163.74 0.00 4,163.74 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 2,861.88 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%2,861.88 0.00 2,861.88 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 3,111.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%3,111.00 0.00 3,111.00 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 144,506.49 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%144,506.49 0.00 144,506.49 0.00 Purchase 05/15/2019 31846V203 3,148.37 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%3,148.37 0.00 3,148.37 0.00 Purchase 05/16/2019 31846V203 10,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%10,500.00 0.00 10,500.00 0.00 Purchase 05/17/2019 31846V203 22,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Execution Time: 6/12/2019 10:17:46 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10 4.13.b Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of May 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 05/18/2019 31846V203 17,110.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%17,110.00 0.00 17,110.00 0.00 Purchase 05/19/2019 31846V203 17,550.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%17,550.00 0.00 17,550.00 0.00 Purchase 05/20/2019 31846V203 1,502,336.96 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%1,502,336.96 0.00 1,502,336.96 0.00 Purchase 05/20/2019 31846V203 22,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Purchase 05/20/2019 31846V203 3,156.56 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%3,156.56 0.00 3,156.56 0.00 Purchase 05/20/2019 31846V203 1,530.08 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%1,530.08 0.00 1,530.08 0.00 Purchase 05/20/2019 31846V203 3,723.96 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%3,723.96 0.00 3,723.96 0.00 Purchase 05/21/2019 037833CU2 2,400,000.00 Apple Inc Callable Note Cont 3/11/2024 2.85% Due 5/11/2024 100.592 2.72%2,414,208.00 1,900.00 2,416,108.00 0.00 Purchase 05/21/2019 31846V203 3,343.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%3,343.33 0.00 3,343.33 0.00 Purchase 05/23/2019 808513AT2 2,000,000.00 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 12/25/2022 2.65% Due 1/25/2023 99.696 2.74%1,993,920.00 17,372.22 2,011,292.22 0.00 Purchase 05/30/2019 31846V203 18,750.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%18,750.00 0.00 18,750.00 0.00 Purchase 05/31/2019 31846V203 137,812.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%137,812.50 0.00 137,812.50 0.00 Purchase 05/31/2019 90CAMP$00 118,319.68 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2.59%118,319.68 0.00 118,319.68 0.00 Subtotal 6,560,194.81 6,568,322.81 19,272.22 6,587,595.03 0.00 Execution Time: 6/12/2019 10:17:46 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11 4.13.b Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of May 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Security Contribution 05/31/2019 90CAMP$00 3,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 9,560,194.81 9,568,322.81 19,272.22 9,587,595.03 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 05/20/2019 912828G95 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due 12/31/2019 99.527 2.40%1,492,910.16 9,426.80 1,502,336.96 -8,173.95 Sale 05/21/2019 31846V203 2,416,108.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%2,416,108.00 0.00 2,416,108.00 0.00 Sale 05/23/2019 31846V203 688,644.53 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.04%688,644.53 0.00 688,644.53 0.00 Sale 05/23/2019 713448CS5 1,330,000.00 PepsiCo Inc Callable Note Cont 3/30/2020 1.85% Due 4/30/2020 99.329 2.58%1,321,075.70 1,571.99 1,322,647.69 -8,781.97 Subtotal 5,934,752.53 5,918,738.39 10,998.79 5,929,737.18 -16,955.92 Paydown 05/15/2019 02582JHE3 0.00 American Express Credit 2017-3 A 1.77% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 1,475.00 1,475.00 0.00 Paydown 05/15/2019 43814QAC2 31,432.45 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-2 A3 1.39% Due 4/15/2020 100.000 31,432.45 74.64 31,507.09 0.00 Paydown 05/15/2019 47788BAD6 31,415.54 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 1.82% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 31,415.54 473.09 31,888.63 0.00 Paydown 05/15/2019 47788CAC6 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-B A4 2.66% Due 4/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,141.59 1,141.59 0.00 Paydown 05/15/2019 47788EAC2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 3.08% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 4,068.17 4,068.17 0.00 Execution Time: 6/12/2019 10:17:46 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12 4.13.b Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of May 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Paydown 05/15/2019 47788MAC4 4,159.03 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-A A3 1.36% Due 4/15/2020 100.000 4,159.03 4.71 4,163.74 0.00 Paydown 05/15/2019 47789JAB2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 2.85% Due 12/15/2021 100.000 0.00 2,861.88 2,861.88 0.00 Paydown 05/15/2019 65479GAD1 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2018-B A3 3.06% Due 3/15/2023 100.000 0.00 3,111.00 3,111.00 0.00 Paydown 05/15/2019 89238BAB8 142,857.02 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A 2.1% Due 10/15/2020 100.000 142,857.02 1,649.47 144,506.49 0.00 Paydown 05/15/2019 89239AAB9 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-A A2A 2.83% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 0.00 3,148.37 3,148.37 0.00 Paydown 05/20/2019 43814PAB6 3,152.44 Honda Auto Receivables Owner T 17-3 A2 1.57% Due 1/21/2020 100.000 3,152.44 4.12 3,156.56 0.00 Paydown 05/20/2019 43814UAG4 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables 2018-2 A3 3.01% Due 5/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,530.08 1,530.08 0.00 Paydown 05/20/2019 43814WAB1 0.00 HAROT 2019-1 A2 2.75% Due 9/20/2021 100.000 0.00 3,723.96 3,723.96 0.00 Paydown 05/21/2019 43815HAC1 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3 2.95% Due 8/22/2022 100.000 0.00 3,343.33 3,343.33 0.00 Subtotal 213,016.48 213,016.48 26,609.41 239,625.89 0.00 Security Withdrawal 05/03/2019 90CAMP$00 4,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 4,000,000.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 05/13/2019 90CAMP$00 1,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 05/17/2019 90CAMP$00 1,400,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,400,000.00 0.00 1,400,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 05/23/2019 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 Execution Time: 6/12/2019 10:17:46 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13 4.13.b Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of May 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Security Withdrawal 05/24/2019 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 Subtotal 8,900,104.17 8,900,104.17 0.00 8,900,104.17 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 15,047,873.18 15,031,859.04 37,608.20 15,069,467.24 -16,955.92 OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 05/03/2019 00440EAT4 2,000,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 10/3/2020 2.3% Due 11/3/2020 0.000 23,000.00 0.00 23,000.00 0.00 Interest 05/11/2019 369550BE7 1,130,000.00 General Dynamics Corp Note 3% Due 5/11/2021 0.000 16,950.00 0.00 16,950.00 0.00 Interest 05/13/2019 40428HPN6 1,000,000.00 HSBC USA Inc Note 2.375% Due 11/13/2019 0.000 11,875.00 0.00 11,875.00 0.00 Interest 05/16/2019 166764BG4 1,000,000.00 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 4/15/2021 2.1% Due 5/16/2021 0.000 10,500.00 0.00 10,500.00 0.00 Interest 05/17/2019 3137EAEK1 2,400,000.00 FHLMC Note 1.875% Due 11/17/2020 0.000 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Interest 05/18/2019 46625HRL6 500,000.00 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont 3/18/2023 2.7% Due 5/18/2023 0.000 6,750.00 0.00 6,750.00 0.00 Interest 05/18/2019 58933YAF2 740,000.00 Merck & Co Note 2.8% Due 5/18/2023 0.000 10,360.00 0.00 10,360.00 0.00 Interest 05/19/2019 857477AV5 1,800,000.00 State Street Bank Note 1.95% Due 5/19/2021 0.000 17,550.00 0.00 17,550.00 0.00 Interest 05/20/2019 747525AD5 2,000,000.00 Qualcomm Inc Note 2.25% Due 5/20/2020 0.000 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Execution Time: 6/12/2019 10:17:46 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14 4.13.b Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of May 31, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 05/30/2019 3135G0F73 2,500,000.00 FNMA Note 1.5% Due 11/30/2020 0.000 18,750.00 0.00 18,750.00 0.00 Interest 05/31/2019 912828G61 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.5% Due 11/30/2019 0.000 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 Interest 05/31/2019 912828R69 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.625% Due 5/31/2023 0.000 12,187.50 0.00 12,187.50 0.00 Interest 05/31/2019 912828U57 5,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.125% Due 11/30/2023 0.000 53,125.00 0.00 53,125.00 0.00 Interest 05/31/2019 912828U65 2,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due 11/30/2021 0.000 21,875.00 0.00 21,875.00 0.00 Interest 05/31/2019 912828XE5 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.5% Due 5/31/2020 0.000 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Interest 05/31/2019 912828XR6 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due 5/31/2022 0.000 13,125.00 0.00 13,125.00 0.00 Subtotal 30,570,000.00 298,547.50 0.00 298,547.50 0.00 Dividend 05/01/2019 31846V203 1,472,925.94 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 0.000 1,364.78 0.00 1,364.78 0.00 Dividend 05/31/2019 90CAMP$00 52,119,094.11 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 0.000 118,319.68 0.00 118,319.68 0.00 Subtotal 53,592,020.05 119,684.46 0.00 119,684.46 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 84,162,020.05 418,231.96 0.00 418,231.96 0.00 Execution Time: 6/12/2019 10:17:46 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 15 4.13.b Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of June 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 06/03/2019 31846V203 2,074.74 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%2,074.74 0.00 2,074.74 0.00 Purchase 06/08/2019 31846V203 123,050.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%123,050.00 0.00 123,050.00 0.00 Purchase 06/09/2019 31846V203 24,375.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%24,375.00 0.00 24,375.00 0.00 Purchase 06/11/2019 31846V203 28,125.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%28,125.00 0.00 28,125.00 0.00 Purchase 06/11/2019 912828WJ5 1,750,000.00 US Treasury Note 2.5% Due 5/15/2024 102.758 1.91%1,798,261.72 3,209.92 1,801,471.64 0.00 Purchase 06/12/2019 31846V203 17,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 0.00 Purchase 06/15/2019 31846V203 22,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 3130A1XJ2 1,900,000.00 FHLB Note 2.875% Due 6/14/2024 104.301 1.97%1,981,719.00 455.21 1,982,174.21 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 13,437.98 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%13,437.98 0.00 13,437.98 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 1,475.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%1,475.00 0.00 1,475.00 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 30,014.22 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%30,014.22 0.00 30,014.22 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 21,570.20 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%21,570.20 0.00 21,570.20 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 1,141.58 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%1,141.58 0.00 1,141.58 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 4,068.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%4,068.17 0.00 4,068.17 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 2,861.88 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%2,861.88 0.00 2,861.88 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 3,111.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%3,111.00 0.00 3,111.00 0.00 Execution Time: 7/22/2019 12:47:50 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10 4.13.b Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of June 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss ACQUISITIONS Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 142,441.11 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%142,441.11 0.00 142,441.11 0.00 Purchase 06/17/2019 31846V203 3,148.37 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%3,148.37 0.00 3,148.37 0.00 Purchase 06/18/2019 31846V203 1,530.08 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%1,530.08 0.00 1,530.08 0.00 Purchase 06/18/2019 31846V203 3,723.96 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%3,723.96 0.00 3,723.96 0.00 Purchase 06/19/2019 3130A1XJ2 1,895,000.00 FHLB Note 2.875% Due 6/14/2024 104.323 1.96%1,976,920.85 756.68 1,977,677.53 0.00 Purchase 06/19/2019 31846V203 27,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%27,500.00 0.00 27,500.00 0.00 Purchase 06/20/2019 31846V203 3,705,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%3,705,000.00 0.00 3,705,000.00 0.00 Purchase 06/20/2019 62479MVK6 3,800,000.00 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Discount CP 2.35% Due 8/19/2019 99.608 2.39%3,785,116.67 0.00 3,785,116.67 0.00 Purchase 06/21/2019 31846V203 3,343.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%3,343.33 0.00 3,343.33 0.00 Purchase 06/24/2019 31846V203 15,955.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%15,955.00 0.00 15,955.00 0.00 Purchase 06/26/2019 31846V203 23,460.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%23,460.00 0.00 23,460.00 0.00 Purchase 06/30/2019 31846V203 26,250.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 1.99%26,250.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00 Purchase 06/30/2019 90CAMP$00 108,990.12 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2.45%108,990.12 0.00 108,990.12 0.00 Subtotal 13,701,646.74 13,898,664.98 4,421.81 13,903,086.79 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 13,701,646.74 13,898,664.98 4,421.81 13,903,086.79 0.00 Execution Time: 7/22/2019 12:47:50 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11 4.13.b Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of June 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Sale 06/11/2019 31846V203 319,271.19 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%319,271.19 0.00 319,271.19 0.00 Sale 06/11/2019 912828S76 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.125% Due 7/31/2021 98.406 1.89%1,476,093.75 6,106.70 1,482,200.45 -472.94 Sale 06/17/2019 912828G61 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.5% Due 11/30/2019 99.711 2.14%1,994,218.75 1,393.44 1,995,612.19 -6,182.06 Sale 06/19/2019 31846V203 235,208.95 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%235,208.95 0.00 235,208.95 0.00 Sale 06/19/2019 912828K58 1,750,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.375% Due 4/30/2020 99.383 2.10%1,739,199.22 3,269.36 1,742,468.58 -8,226.23 Sale 06/20/2019 31846V203 3,785,116.67 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 2.01%3,785,116.67 0.00 3,785,116.67 0.00 Subtotal 9,589,596.81 9,549,108.53 10,769.50 9,559,878.03 -14,881.23 Paydown 06/17/2019 02582JHE3 0.00 American Express Credit 2017-3 A 1.77% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 1,475.00 1,475.00 0.00 Paydown 06/17/2019 43814QAC2 29,975.99 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-2 A3 1.39% Due 4/15/2020 100.000 29,975.99 38.23 30,014.22 0.00 Paydown 06/17/2019 47788BAD6 21,144.76 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 1.82% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 21,144.76 425.44 21,570.20 0.00 Paydown 06/17/2019 47788CAC6 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-B A4 2.66% Due 4/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,141.58 1,141.58 0.00 Paydown 06/17/2019 47788EAC2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 3.08% Due 11/15/2022 100.000 0.00 4,068.17 4,068.17 0.00 Paydown 06/17/2019 47789JAB2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 2.85% Due 12/15/2021 100.000 0.00 2,861.88 2,861.88 0.00 Paydown 06/17/2019 65479GAD1 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2018-B A3 3.06% Due 3/15/2023 100.000 0.00 3,111.00 3,111.00 0.00 Paydown 06/17/2019 89238BAB8 141,041.64 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A 2.1% Due 10/15/2020 100.000 141,041.64 1,399.47 142,441.11 0.00 Execution Time: 7/22/2019 12:47:50 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12 4.13.b Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of June 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss DISPOSITIONS Paydown 06/17/2019 89239AAB9 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables 2019-A A2A 2.83% Due 10/15/2021 100.000 0.00 3,148.37 3,148.37 0.00 Paydown 06/18/2019 43814UAG4 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables 2018-2 A3 3.01% Due 5/18/2022 100.000 0.00 1,530.08 1,530.08 0.00 Paydown 06/18/2019 43814WAB1 0.00 HAROT 2019-1 A2 2.75% Due 9/20/2021 100.000 0.00 3,723.96 3,723.96 0.00 Paydown 06/21/2019 43815HAC1 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3 2.95% Due 8/22/2022 100.000 0.00 3,343.33 3,343.33 0.00 Subtotal 192,162.39 192,162.39 26,266.51 218,428.90 0.00 Maturity 06/20/2019 62479MTL7 3,705,000.00 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Discount CP 2.6% Due 6/20/2019 99.133 3,705,000.00 0.00 3,705,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 3,705,000.00 3,705,000.00 0.00 3,705,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 06/14/2019 90CAMP$00 600,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 600,000.00 0.00 600,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 06/20/2019 90CAMP$00 4,500,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 4,500,000.00 0.00 4,500,000.00 0.00 Security Withdrawal 06/25/2019 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 Subtotal 5,100,104.17 5,100,104.17 0.00 5,100,104.17 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 18,586,863.37 18,546,375.09 37,036.01 18,583,411.10 -14,881.23 OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 06/08/2019 3130A0F70 5,000,000.00 FHLB Note 3.375% Due 12/8/2023 0.000 84,375.00 0.00 84,375.00 0.00 Interest 06/08/2019 69353RFL7 2,210,000.00 PNC Bank Callable Note Cont 5/9/2023 3.5% Due 6/8/2023 0.000 38,675.00 0.00 38,675.00 0.00 Interest 06/09/2019 313383QR5 1,500,000.00 FHLB Note 3.25% Due 6/9/2023 0.000 24,375.00 0.00 24,375.00 0.00 Interest 06/11/2019 313379RB7 3,000,000.00 FHLB Note 1.875% Due 6/11/2021 0.000 28,125.00 0.00 28,125.00 0.00 Execution Time: 7/22/2019 12:47:50 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13 4.13.b Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Transaction Ledger As of June 30, 2019 City of Dublin Consolidated Account #10221 Transaction Type Settlement Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 06/12/2019 313383HU8 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note 1.75% Due 6/12/2020 0.000 17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 0.00 Interest 06/15/2019 097023BQ7 2,400,000.00 Boeing Co Callable Note Cont 4/15/2023 1.875% Due 6/15/2023 0.000 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00 Interest 06/19/2019 3137EAEN5 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Note 2.75% Due 6/19/2023 0.000 27,500.00 0.00 27,500.00 0.00 Interest 06/24/2019 166764AH3 1,000,000.00 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 3/24/2023 3.191% Due 6/24/2023 0.000 15,955.00 0.00 15,955.00 0.00 Interest 06/26/2019 931142EK5 1,380,000.00 Wal-Mart Stores Callable Note Cont 5/26/2023 3.4% Due 6/26/2023 0.000 23,460.00 0.00 23,460.00 0.00 Interest 06/30/2019 912828XW5 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 1.75% Due 6/30/2022 0.000 26,250.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00 Subtotal 23,490,000.00 308,715.00 0.00 308,715.00 0.00 Dividend 06/03/2019 31846V203 409,944.37 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 0.000 2,074.74 0.00 2,074.74 0.00 Dividend 06/30/2019 90CAMP$00 50,137,413.79 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 0.000 108,990.12 0.00 108,990.12 0.00 Subtotal 50,547,358.16 111,064.86 0.00 111,064.86 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 74,037,358.16 419,779.86 0.00 419,779.86 0.00 Execution Time: 7/22/2019 12:47:50 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14 4.13.b Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: 2. Transaction Ledger - April - June 2019 (Q4 Investment Report) Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Appointments to the City Council 2019 Ad-Hoc Audit Review Committee Prepared by: Colleen Tribby, Director of Administrative Services EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City’s independent auditor, Badawi and Associates, has commenced the field work necessary to complete the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for year ending June 30, 2019. The City Council will consider the establishment of an Ad-Hoc Committee, comprised of two City Councilmembers, who will review the audit process and final report with the auditors. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm the Mayor’s recommendation of Councilmembers Josey and Kuma gai as the 2019 Ad-Hoc Audit Review Committee. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost of the audit was included in the Fiscal Year 2019-20 adopted budget. DESCRIPTION: The independent auditors from the firm of Badawi and Associates are required to follow protocols established by the Governmental Auditing Standards Board and issue their directives in documents referenced as the Statement on Accounting Standards, which are applicable to both private and governmental entities. These standards require that the auditors communicate directly with those charged with governance. The Ad-Hoc Audit Review Committee, comprised of two Councilmembers appointed by the Mayor, is established each year for this purpose. After the Committee has had an opportunity to review and discuss the report with the auditors, at a future City Council meeting, Staff will prepare an agenda item for action by the entire City Council. 4.14 Packet Pg. 241 Page 2 of 2 Last year, the Committee was comprised of Mayor Haubert and Vice Mayor Hernandez. Mayor Haubert has recommended the appointment of Councilmembers Josey and Kumagai to serve as the 2019 Ad-Hoc Audit Review Committee. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. 4.14 Packet Pg. 242 Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers Prepared by: Veronica Briggs, Senior Finance Technician EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from June 1, 2019 - July 31, 2019 totaling $17,435,706.36. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. FINANCIAL IMPACT: SUMMARY OF PAYMENTS ISSUED June 1, 2019 through July 31, 2019 Total Number of Payments: 806 Total Amount of Payments: $17,435,706.36 DESCRIPTION: The Payment Issuance Report (Attachment 1) provides a listing of all payments for the period beginning June 1, 2019 through July 31, 2019. This report is provided in accordance with the policy adopted November 15, 2011 in Resolution No.189 -11. The listing of payments has been reviewed in accordance with the policies for processing payments and expenditures. The City’s practice of reporting payments to the City Council after the payments have been made is in compliance with California Government Code Sections 37208 (b) and (c), which allow for an agency to make payments without first being audited by the legislative body, as long as such payments are: 1) conforming to a budget approved by ordinance or resolution of the legislative body; and 2) presented to the legislative body for ratification and approval in the form of an audited comprehensive annual financial report. 4.15 Packet Pg. 243 Page 2 of 2 STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 4.15 Packet Pg. 244 Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 1 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/03/2019 ACHA, CHRISTINE 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 ACTIVE NETWORKS, LLC 6,827.54 RECREATION SOFTWARE UPGRADE 06/03/2019 ALCO EMA, TREASURER 100.00 ALCO EMERGENCY MANAGERS' ASSN DUES-CARTER 06/03/2019 AMP PRINTING, INC. 457.00 THE WAVE SIGNAGE PRINTING 06/03/2019 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 35.76 MAT SERVICE-SHANNON CENTER MAY 2019 06/03/2019 BAHU, OLGA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 BAIG, SUMAIYA 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 BALDANIYA, KIRIT 63.50 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MGMT DIST 367.00 ANNUAL CIVIC CENTER GENERATOR PERMIT FEE 06/03/2019 BPXPRESS 230.19 PRINTING SERVICES FOR CIP ST0317 AVB 06/03/2019 BRAR, GURPREET 520.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 BRESLAW, AARON 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 CALED 100.00 CALED MEMBERSHIP FY 19/20 - FOSS 570.00 CALED MEMBERSHIP FY 19/20 - SMITH Check Total: 670.00 06/03/2019 CHOW, HOYAN 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 CITIES GROUP, THE 1,573.16 WORKERS COMP/SAFETY COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT 06/03/2019 COIT SERVICES, INC. 250.00 CARPET CLEANING SVCS-THE WAVE 06/03/2019 DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 7,895.00 THE WAVE POOL SLIDE INSPECTION FEES 06/03/2019 DILLON, LISA 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 DUBLIN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 10,000.00 ANNUAL SPONSORSHIP CONTRIBUTION FY 18/19 06/03/2019 EAST BAY POOL SERVICE, INC. 749.46 POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE WAVE 06/03/2019 EISENSTADT, DAVID B. 1,000.00 UTILITY BOX ART PROJECT 06/03/2019 EVAN, ROBERTA 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 FEHR & PEERS 5,827.50 ENGINEERING SVCS APR 2019 2,262.75 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY Check Total: 8,090.25 06/03/2019 FITZPATRICK, SHELLEY 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 FLOYD, CATHERINE 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 417.66 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 5/24/19 06/03/2019 GARTNER, ALESHA 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 GILL, USAMA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 GRANT, IRMA 1,000.00 UTILITY BOX ART PROJECT 06/03/2019 GUO, WINNIE 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 2,867.50 2019 SLURRY SEAL DESIGN APR 2019 06/03/2019 HIEB, MICHAELA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 HOUSHMAND, FARNAZ 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 JACKMAN, SHARI 76.60 REIMBURSE PUBLIC INFO OFFICERS CONF EXPENSES 06/03/2019 JAM SERVICES INC 8,576.13 RAPID FLASHING BEACONS/STREET NAME SIGNS 06/03/2019 JASWAL, SHWETA 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY 396.69 FIRE ALARM MONITORING-CIVIC CENTER 776.20 FIRE ALARM MONITORING-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX Check Total: 1,172.89 06/03/2019 JOSAFAT, MIRANDA 390.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 KARUNANIDHI, SARAVANAN 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC. 356.74 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 06/03/2019 LAROSA, CHERELLE 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 LIU, CHAOYEN 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 LIVINGSTON, MICHAEL 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 4.15.a Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 2 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/03/2019 MARAMBE, NIVANTHIE 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 MCE CORPORATION 498,136.89 BUILDING MAINTENANCE APR 2019 06/03/2019 MOORE MECHANICAL INC. 54.80 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE 06/03/2019 MORRISON, KRISTEN 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 MUSALLAM, FIDA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 PARK, SUHYUN 1,000.00 UTILITY BOX ART PROJECT 06/03/2019 PG&E 222.38 SERVICE TO 05/02/19 57.85 SERVICE TO 05/07/19 27,452.75 SERVICE TO 05/08/19 3,454.92 SERVICE TO 05/09/19 78.60 SERVICE TO 05/10/19 1,628.22 SERVICE TO 05/13/19 625.91 SERVICE TO 05/14/19 Check Total: 33,520.63 06/03/2019 PINGALE, SUJATA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 PIZZA GUYS 324.00 THE WAVE BIRTHDAY PARTY PACKAGE SUPPLIES 06/03/2019 PORCIUNCULA, JESSICA 65.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 PUBLIC BENEFIT TECHNOLOGY 425.00 CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO SERVICES APR 2019 06/03/2019 PURNELL, JENNIFER 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 QUAN, MICHELLE 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 RAUCH, VIRGINIA 500.00 SENIOR CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/03/2019 RHODES, WINSTON 13,000.00 GENERAL RELEASE PER AGREEMENT 06/03/2019 ROSDAHL, MARGARITA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 272.00 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DEPT 06/03/2019 RUSHAN, SHAAHIN 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 SABALVARO, MICHAEL 275.00 PICNIC AREA RENTAL CANCELLATION REFUND 06/03/2019 SAN LEANDRO, CITY OF 1,050.00 LOCAL GOV'T LEADERSHIP ACADEMY REG-JACKMAN 06/03/2019 SENIOR SUPPORT PROGRAM 1,265.99 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT AUG 2018 3,456.98 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT OCT-DEC 2018 982.64 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT SEPT 2018 Check Total: 5,705.61 06/03/2019 SIU, HENRY 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 49,414.77 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX CONSULTANT SERVICES 06/03/2019 TANEJA, RAKESH 416.70 REIMBURSEMENT TRI-VALLEY YOUTH EXPO SUPPLIES 06/03/2019 TESLA ENERGY 8.00 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE 06/03/2019 THANGELLAPALLI, RAJENDRA 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV 1,150.45 RECORD/TELEVISE CITY COUNCIL & PLNG MTGS 06/03/2019 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 5/24/19 06/03/2019 UNIVAR USA INC 882.85 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 06/03/2019 WIENHOLZ, VERONICA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 WILLIAMS, CHRIS 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/03/2019 XIAO, KAIJIA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES Payments Issued 6/3/2019 Total: 667,423.01 06/06/2019 UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA 11,734.26 LIFE AND AD&D PREMIUM - JUN 2019 Payments Issued 6/6/2019 Total: 11,734.26 4.15.a Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 3 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/10/2019 4LEAF INC. 106,003.50 BUILDING INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SVCS APR 2019 2,925.00 BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES CIP APR 2019 Check Total: 108,928.50 06/10/2019 ALEX, ROSEMARY 7.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT APR 2019 06/10/2019 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC 11,306.40 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 5/5/19 - 5/18/19 06/10/2019 AMEER, SYED 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 AMP PRINTING, INC. 1,226.88 CITY EVENTS & ACTIVITY PRINTING 06/10/2019 ARAI, YUKO 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 42.91 MAT SERVICE - CORP YARD MAY 2019 39.03 MAT SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER MAY 2019 69.22 MAT SERVICES-SHANNON CENTER MAY 2019 Check Total: 151.16 06/10/2019 ASSOCIATED RIGHT OF WAY SVCS 7,500.00 RIGHT OF WAY APPRAISAL SERVICES 06/10/2019 AT&T - CALNET 3 115.41 SERVICE TO 05/01/19 1,157.40 SERVICE TO 05/12/19 482.15 SERVICE TO 05/14/19 286.31 SERVICE TO 05/26/19 41.26 SERVICE TO 05/27/19 Check Total: 2,082.53 06/10/2019 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 279.86 LEGAL NOTICES APR 2019 06/10/2019 BELLECCI & ASSOCIATES, INC. 16,125.98 DESIGN SUPPORT DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING FEB 2019 06/10/2019 BENSON, DAWN 171.89 REIMB PLANNING COMMISSIONERS CONF EXPENSES 06/10/2019 BESS, KENNETH 1,325.05 PARKS SIGN DESIGN SERVICES 06/10/2019 BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 27,755.36 CONCEPT DESIGNS/CONSTR DOCS FALLON PARK 06/10/2019 BIG O TIRES #7 375.97 POLICE VEHICLE TIRES & MAINTENANCE 06/10/2019 BKF ENGINEERS 14,340.32 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY DUBLIN BLVD 06/10/2019 BPXPRESS 109.20 PRINTING SVCS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX PROJ 06/10/2019 BUSSE, STEPHANIE 1,301.17 REIMB PROPERTY & EVIDENCE CONF EXPENSES 06/10/2019 CAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY INC 6,095.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES APR 2019 06/10/2019 CHAN, ROSA 346.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/10/2019 CHS CONSULTING GROUP 2,689.68 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SVCS APR 2019 06/10/2019 CINTAS CORP 62.59 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES 06/10/2019 CIVICPLUS 133.56 CITY WEBSITE ANNUAL HOSTING FEE & SUPPORT 06/10/2019 COIT SERVICES, INC. 469.00 CARPET CLEANING SVCS CIVIC CTR MAY 2019 06/10/2019 COSBY, CONRAD 500.00 SENIOR CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/10/2019 COX, CHRISTINA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 DAHLIN GROUP INC 1,310.25 AQUATIC COMPLEX ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SVCS 06/10/2019 DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 1,170.00 THE WAVE POOL SLIDE INSPECTION FEES 06/10/2019 DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 110.00 HISTORICAL VEHICLE ANNUAL REGISTRATION 06/10/2019 DSRSD 90.50 SERVICE TO 5/23/2019 06/10/2019 DUBLIN CHEVROLET 574.25 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 06/10/2019 DUBLIN CROSSING, LLC 2,125.50 PROPERTY ESCROW OVERPAYMENT REFUND 06/10/2019 DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 203.89 STAGER GYM UTILITIES GAS 3/4/19-4/2/19 06/10/2019 ELITE AUTO GLASS INC 409.64 POLICE VEHICLE WINDSHIELD REPLACEMENT 06/10/2019 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR 2,007.41 VEHICLE RENTAL-SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT 06/10/2019 GATES & ASSOCIATES, INC., DAVID L. 21,212.38 DESIGN SERVICES-DSG ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND 06/10/2019 GOLDEN STATE FLEET SVCS INC 785.00 POLICE VEHICLE TOW 06/10/2019 GOMEZ, DESIREE 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 4.15.a Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 4 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/10/2019 GORDON HUETHER + PARTNERS, INC 50,000.00 PUBLIC ART FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 06/10/2019 GRIFFITHS, DIANA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 HERZ, CASSANDRA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 JOCHNER, RICH 22.04 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/10/2019 JONES, SONIA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 JOSHI, KEDAR 48.00 REC ACTIVITY CANCELLATION REFUND 06/10/2019 KAUR, RAJWINDER 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 10,950.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES APR 2019 06/10/2019 KING, YVONNE 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 KOEPLIN, DIANA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 LEHR AUTO 4,202.50 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 06/10/2019 LIANG, SIWEI 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 LIFELOC TECHNOLOGIES INC 188.31 POLICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR 06/10/2019 LIVERMORE AUTO GROUP 2,337.39 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 06/10/2019 LIVERMORE HARLEY DAVIDSON 417.98 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 06/10/2019 MARTINEZ, ALMA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 MASSE, JENNI 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 MEIN, STEPHANIE 45.94 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 MENESES, MELONIE 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 MEYERS NAVE 48,551.10 LEGAL SERVICES APR 2019 06/10/2019 NORM'S TOWING SERVICE, LLC 225.00 POLICE VEHICLE TOW 06/10/2019 NORWOOD, STEPHANIE 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 OH, HAYOUN 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 OLBERDING ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 6,817.50 GHAD SUPPORT CONSULTING SERVICES MAR-APR 2019 06/10/2019 OLIVE, IRENE 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 OPERIO, GLADYS ZARATE 260.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 PGADESIGN INC. 2,099.19 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SUB AREA 3 APR 2019 06/10/2019 PHILLIPS, AMY 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 PHOENIX GROUP INFO SYS. 477.40 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING APR 2019 06/10/2019 RAHIMI, KHALIDA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP 4,020.00 PLANNING SERVICES APR 2019 06/10/2019 RUBIO, RON 500.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/10/2019 SAN RAMON TOW INC 235.00 POLICE EVIDENCE TOW 06/10/2019 SOLAIMAN, FEROZA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 STONERIDGE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE 340.98 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 06/10/2019 SUPARTO, JOSEPHINE 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 86,578.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING PROJ 06/10/2019 TAN, SHIRLENE 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 TJIPTONO, FRANSISCA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 TRAFFICWARE GROUP, INC. 14,954.20 ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM-DOUGHERTY RD 06/10/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 3,512.00 PARKING CITATIONS COLLECTED APR 2019 06/10/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 27,295.00 JAIL ACCESS FEES APR 2019 06/10/2019 TRUONG, NHATHUY 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 TURANOVIC, AIDA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/10/2019 VSI RISK MGMT & ERGONOMICS INC 1,210.00 ERGONOMIC EVALUATIONS 06/10/2019 WARDAK, LEEZA 65.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES Payments Issued 6/10/2019 Total: 502,700.25 06/14/2019 CAL PERS 72,282.37 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 6/7/19 06/14/2019 DSRSD 10,752.39 SERVICE TO 5/14/2019 4.15.a Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 5 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/14/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 16,738.92 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 6/7/19 06/14/2019 I C M A 401 PLAN 4,760.74 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 6/7/19 06/14/2019 I C M A 457 PLAN 25,772.72 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 6/7/19 06/14/2019 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 54,675.14 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 6/7/19 06/14/2019 US BANK - PARS 4,691.65 PARS: PE 6/7/19 06/14/2019 WAGEWORKS, INC. 3,957.79 WAGEWORKS 2019: PE 6/7/19 Payments Issued 6/14/2019 Total: 193,631.72 06/17/2019 4 PAWS GOOSE CONTROL, INC 1,000.00 GEESE CONTROL SERVICES MAY 2019 06/17/2019 4LEAF INC. 180.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES APR 2019 06/17/2019 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERVICES 174.08 THE WAVE CONCESSION CLEANING SUPPLIES 06/17/2019 AMP PRINTING, INC. 124.88 BUSINESS CARDS 06/17/2019 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 62.00 MAT SERVICE-CIVIC CENTER MAR 2019 75.07 MAT SERVICE-CIVIC CENTER MAY 2019 35.36 MAT SERVICE-CORP YARD MAR 2019 37.03 MAT SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER MAR 2019 57.12 MAT SERVICE-SHANNON CENTER MAR 2019 Check Total: 266.58 06/17/2019 AT&T - CALNET 3 81.16 SERVICE TO 05/27/19 06/17/2019 BELLONE, CARLENE 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 BERGER, ROBERT L. 1,407.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 BLAISDELL'S BUSINESS PRODUCTS 3,570.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES - MAY 2019 06/17/2019 BLANCHARD, STEPHANE 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 BPXPRESS 1,244.33 PLANS & SPECS PRINTING-FALLON SPORTS PARK PROJ 06/17/2019 CALIFORNIA SPIRIT ELITE, INC. 201.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 CALTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 691.12 COPIES-MAY 2019 06/17/2019 CASTRO VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS 237.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 7,406.27 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 06/17/2019 CENTENO, CAMILLE 5.45 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/17/2019 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 11,822.65 INVESTMENT CONSULTING SERVICES MAY 2019 06/17/2019 CHING, ERWIN 116.00 REIMB ENGINEERING LICENSE RENEWAL FEES 06/17/2019 CHINTHAGUMPALA, RESHMAN 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 CIVICPLUS 45.08 THE WAVE WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 06/17/2019 COIT SERVICES, INC. 646.00 CARPET CLEANING SVCS-SHANNON CENTER MAY 2019 06/17/2019 COMCAST 3,273.59 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION INTERNET TO 5/31/19 06/17/2019 CONVERGEONE, INC. 22,113.69 CISCO SMARTNET ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 06/17/2019 CRANFORD, ROBIN 1,701.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 CRICKET FOR CUBS 1,421.00 FIELD RENTAL CANCELLATION REFUND 06/17/2019 DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. 862.21 GREASE TRAP SERVICE-SHANNON CENTER MAY 2019 06/17/2019 DHADWAL, RENUKA 91.64 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/17/2019 DIPPIN' DOTS, L.L.C. 1,054.64 ICE CREAM CONCESSION AT THE WAVE 06/17/2019 DUGGANAPALLY, ARUN 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 ECAM SECURE INC 5,820.00 EAGLE CAM ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 06/17/2019 ECESSA CORPORATION 5,495.00 NETWORK LOAD BALANCER SUPPORT MAINTENANCE 06/17/2019 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 25,985.60 VIDEO CAMERAS-DOUGHERTY/DUBLIN INTERSECTIONS 06/17/2019 ELECTRICBABY, INC. 270.00 HOUSING CONSULTING SERVICES APR-MAY 2019 06/17/2019 ELLIOTT, ELIZABETH 43.38 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/17/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 163.00 QUARTERLY CENSUS OF EMPLOYMENT/WAGES REPORT 06/17/2019 EVERYTHING GROWS INTERIOR 192.77 PLANT SERVICE JUN 2019 4.15.a Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 6 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/17/2019 FALLON, DEBORAH P. 96.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 FEDEX 124.10 EXPRESS SHIPPING MAY 2019 06/17/2019 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 626.17 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 6/7/19 06/17/2019 FRANCISCO & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3,535.00 ADMIN & AUDIT SVCS - CFD 2015-1 IMPROV AREA 1 06/17/2019 FRANKLIN, RHONDA 12.06 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/17/2019 GARCIA, ISELA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC. 8,362.25 TRAIL DESIGN & GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES JAN 2019 9,227.75 TRAIL DESIGN & GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES NOV 2018 5,521.25 TRAIL DESIGN & GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES OCT 2018 31,764.25 VILLAGE PRKWY REPAIR GEOTECH INVESTIGATION Check Total: 54,875.50 06/17/2019 HARRELL HARRIS PHOTOGRAPHY 675.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES - HERITAGE FACILITY 375.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES - THE WAVE FACILITY Check Total: 1,050.00 06/17/2019 HOUSTON, KELLY 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 HUM, BRIANNE 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 IMAGE SALES, INC. 2,277.99 NEW ID BADGE PRINTER 06/17/2019 INDIGO/HAMMOND + PLAYLE 14,487.07 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN-POLICE BLDG RENOVATIONS 06/17/2019 JACKMAN, SHARI 40.95 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/17/2019 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 1,379.00 REFUND DEVELOPER DEPOSIT 06/17/2019 KAUR, PARMEET 390.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 KINDERMUSIK W/ MS LINDSAY & 1,596.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 KLUBER ASSOCIATES, INC 4,567.50 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SVCS MAY 2019 06/17/2019 LAN, HAO 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 9.50 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES MAY 2019 06/17/2019 LANLOGIC INC. 425.00 INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONSULTING SVCS MAY 2019 1,050.00 MALWARE SOFTWARE MONITORING MAY 2019 231.25 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG NETWORK SUPPORT MAY 2019 Check Total: 1,706.25 06/17/2019 LAVY, CLARA 500.00 HERITAGE PARK RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/17/2019 LOEWKE PLANNING ASSOCIATES 10,170.00 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES MAY 2019 06/17/2019 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3,525.00 GIS CONSULTING SERVICES MAY 2019 06/17/2019 MAKE ME A PRO SPORTS 2,142.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 MCE CORPORATION 9,497.42 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DSRSD MAY 2019 06/17/2019 M-GROUP 9,425.00 PLANNING SERVICES MAY 2019 06/17/2019 MISRA, VAISHNAVI 1,663.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 NEOPOST USA INC 152.95 POSTAGE MACHINE SUPPLIES 06/17/2019 NGIM, SUSAN 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 NGUYEN, LISA 65.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 NGUYEN, PHUONG 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 NUON, CHANTEL 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 OPENGOV, INC. 1,788.00 OPENGOV ANNUAL HOSTING FEES 06/17/2019 PACIFIC COAST AV 960.00 THE WAVE TV MONITOR INSTALLATION 3,650.43 THE WAVE TV MONITORS Check Total: 4,610.43 06/17/2019 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 3,230.00 2019 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6,460.00 PROJ MGMT DESIGN PHASE-DSG ALL ABILITY PLYGRND Check Total: 9,690.00 06/17/2019 PG&E 39.79 SERVICE TO 05/13/19 4.15.a Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 7 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 60.61 SERVICE TO 05/14/19 24,919.31 SERVICE TO 05/16/19 Check Total: 25,019.71 06/17/2019 PHILLIPS, TYLER 22.04 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/17/2019 PRESERVATION ARTS, LLC 1,500.00 DOG PARK ART PROPOSAL REVIEW 06/17/2019 RAMIREZ, PAULINA 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 RASMUSSEN, ALICIA 42.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/17/2019 ROTARY CLUB OF DUBLIN, CA 562.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/17/2019 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 544.00 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DEPT 06/17/2019 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP 2,087.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES APR 2019 06/17/2019 SALAMANCA, MATTHEW 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 SENIOR SUPPORT PROGRAM 3,060.56 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JAN-MAR 2019 06/17/2019 SHAMROCK OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LLC 10.50 COPIER OVERAGES APR 2019 35.11 COPIER OVERAGES DEC 2018 58.16 COPIER OVERAGES FEB 2019 56.76 COPIER OVERAGES JAN 2019 54.47 COPIER OVERAGES MAR 2019 1,480.09 PRINTER OVERAGES 01/22/19-04/21/19 Check Total: 1,695.09 06/17/2019 SIERRA DISPLAY, INC. 2,295.00 BANNER INSTALLATION & CHANGE-OUT SVCS APR 2019 2,014.50 BANNER INSTALLATION & CHANGE-OUT SVCS MAY 2019 1,975.73 MILITARY BANNER PROGRAM Check Total: 6,285.23 06/17/2019 SIMPLER SYSTEMS, INC 1,500.00 SIMPLER SOFTWARE LICENSING JUN 2019 06/17/2019 SMITH, KEVIN 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 SQUAD ESTATES 2,427.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 STUDIO BLUE REPROGRAPHICS 26.22 PRINTING SERVICES-FALLON PARK PH 3 06/17/2019 T-MOBILE USA, INC. 431.06 CITY CELL PHONE SERVICES MAY 2019 06/17/2019 TRACEY, BOBBI 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 10,060.57 FUEL APR 2019 06/17/2019 TRI-VALLEY HAVEN, INC 1,725.26 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT APR 2019 06/17/2019 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 6/7/19 06/17/2019 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 710.00 BUSINESS REPLY MAIL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FEE 06/17/2019 US FOODS, INC. 3,132.77 THE WAVE CONCESSION SUPPLIES 06/17/2019 VALLEYCARE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 35.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL SCREENING 06/17/2019 VIJAY, JALAKAM 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 VIKING SIGN INSTALLATIONS, INC 75.00 REFUND ZONING CLEARANCE APPLICATION FEE 06/17/2019 WANZENRIED, NICKI 18.44 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FEB 2019 06/17/2019 WARSI, REHANA 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 WEISS, ROBIN S. 636.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/17/2019 WILKINSON, JENNIFER 39.44 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/17/2019 WONG, SHIRLEY 195.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES 06/17/2019 YAM, SREY 130.00 REFUND PRESCHOOL FEES Payments Issued 6/17/2019 Total: 303,111.60 06/18/2019 BAY ISLAND OFFICIAL ASSOC 2,394.00 SPORTS OFFICIATING SERVICES 06/18/2019 SAN RAMON VALLEY OFFICIALS AS 1,429.00 ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIATING SERVICES Payments Issued 6/18/2019 Total: 3,823.00 4.15.a Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 8 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/24/2019 ALAMEDA CO SHERIFF'S OFFICE 96.90 PRINTING SERVICES MAY 2019 06/24/2019 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERVICES 12.00 THE WAVE CONCESSION SUPPLIES 06/24/2019 AMP PRINTING, INC. 420.50 BUSINESS CARDS 129.25 DUBLIN COMMUNITY MEETING SIGNS Check Total: 549.75 06/24/2019 ARORA, AKSHAY 15,645.90 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/24/2019 AZAD, SEANA 55.00 PARKING CITATION REFUND 06/24/2019 BALLARD, MITCH 1,000.00 FARMERS' MARKET CONCERT SOUND TECHNICIAN SVCS 06/24/2019 BIG O TIRES #7 201.38 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 475.96 POLICE VEHICLE TIRES & MAINTENANCE Check Total: 677.34 06/24/2019 BRICKS 4 KIDZ 1,411.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/24/2019 CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE 32,367.55 RETENTION DEPOSIT-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 06/24/2019 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 7,505.14 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 06/24/2019 COMCAST 1,326.87 INTERNET & CABLE SVCS-VARIOUS CITY DEPTS 06/24/2019 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 248.00 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES APR 2019 433.00 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES MAY 2019 Check Total: 681.00 06/24/2019 DUBLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PFC 66.50 REFUND 1/2 FIREWORKS BOOTH APPLICATION 06/24/2019 DUBLIN HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 70.00 PRESERVATION ANNUAL DINNER- MCLANE/PHILLIPS 06/24/2019 DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 28,994.00 REC PROGRAMS CUSTODIAL SERVICES JAN-MAY 2019 1,201.57 STAGER GYM WATER/SEWER USAGE 4/1/19-5/31/19 Check Total: 30,195.57 06/24/2019 DUNBAR ARMORED INC 390.49 ARMORED CAR SERVICE JUN 2019 06/24/2019 EAST BAY DIVISION LCC 50.00 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES MEETING - HERNANDEZ 06/24/2019 EAST BAY DIVISION LCC 25.00 BALLOT MEASURE TRAINING ACADEMY - IARLA Vendor Total: 75.00 06/24/2019 EDEN HOUSING INC. 2,518.39 DEVELOPER DEPOSIT REFUND 06/24/2019 EVERPRO KIDS 2,029.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/24/2019 GOLDEN STATE FLEET SVCS INC 275.00 POLICE VEHICLE TOW 06/24/2019 GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS LLC 1,265.00 JUNIOR WARRIORS BASKETBALL CAMPS 06/24/2019 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO INC. 937,109.90 CONSTRUCTION SVCS-DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING PROJ 06/24/2019 GURUS EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 5,002.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/24/2019 HAWK ANALYTICS 2,497.50 POLICE CELL PHONE ANALYSIS SUBSCRIPTION 06/24/2019 ICMA 1,400.00 ICMA MEMBERSHIP DUES FY19-20 FOSS 1,400.00 ICMA MEMBERSHIP DUES FY19-20 SMITH Check Total: 2,800.00 06/24/2019 IRON MOUNTAIN 195.70 ACAP RECORDS STORAGE JUN 2019 303.11 POLICE RECORDS STORAGE JUN 2019 Check Total: 498.81 06/24/2019 LANLOGIC INC. 10,384.09 INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONSULTING SVCS MAY 2019 3,931.25 PHONE SERVER UPGRADES MAY 2019 Check Total: 14,315.34 06/24/2019 LEHR AUTO 42.50 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 06/24/2019 LESLIE'S POOLMART, INC. 112.16 THE WAVE POOL SUPPLIES 06/24/2019 LIVERMORE AUTO GROUP 11,585.46 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 06/24/2019 LIVERMORE HARLEY DAVIDSON 417.98 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 4.15.a Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 9 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/24/2019 MAILFINANCE INC. 1,066.39 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE PAYMENT APR-JUN 2019 06/24/2019 MCE CORPORATION 573,164.65 BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAY 2019 9,497.42 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DSRSD APR 2019 Check Total: 582,662.07 06/24/2019 MEREDITH FAMILY INC 5,530.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/24/2019 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 11,655.42 POLICE MOTORCYCLE EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT 06/24/2019 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L, INC. 945.00 HOUSING PROGRAM ASSISTANCE MAY 2019 06/24/2019 ORLANDI TRAILER INC. 5,819.97 CUSTOM-BUILT TRAILER FOR CITY EVENTS 06/24/2019 PHANTOM FIREWORKS 66.50 REFUND 1/2 FIREWORKS BOOTH APPLICATION FEE 06/24/2019 PLAN JPA 292.50 INSURANCE CLAIMS EXPENSE MAY 2019 06/24/2019 PYTHON RON'S REPTILE KINGDOM 425.00 GUEST SPEAKER FOR FIELD TRIP 06/24/2019 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 326.40 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DEPT 06/24/2019 S & S WORLDWIDE INC 1,234.36 AFTER SCHOOL REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 1,861.14 RECREATION SUPPLIES Check Total: 3,095.50 06/24/2019 SAN RAMON VALLEY OFFICIALS AS 1,510.00 ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIATING SERVICES 06/24/2019 SAUSAL CORPORATION 616,883.54 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 06/24/2019 SHAMROCK OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LLC 40.27 COPIER OVERAGES APR 2019 44.38 COPIER OVERAGES MAY 2019 48.95 COPIER SUPPLIES Check Total: 133.60 06/24/2019 SPECIAL EVENTS 1,348.97 FARMERS’ MARKET EQUIPMENT RENTAL 06/24/2019 SQUAD ESTATES 2,041.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/24/2019 STONERIDGE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE 1,814.13 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 06/24/2019 TRB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 4,380.00 INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SERVICES MAY 2019 06/24/2019 VERIZON WIRELESS 2,605.64 POLICE CELL PHONE SERVICE TO 06/03/19 786.11 POLICE SITCAM SIM CARD SERVICE TO 06/03/19 Check Total: 3,391.75 06/24/2019 VSI RISK MGMT & ERGONOMICS INC 935.00 ERGONOMIC EVALUATIONS 06/24/2019 WC3-WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANT 9,240.00 INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SERVICES MAY 2019 06/24/2019 WU, PATRICIA 17.75 SENIOR CENTER VAN DRIVER MEAL REIMBURSEMENT Payments Issued 6/24/2019 Total: 2,326,178.34 06/26/2019 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 4,215.04 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE BOOKS 3,909.22 RECREATION & SUMMER STAFF TRAINING SUPPLIES 8.95 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MTG EXP-HAUBERT 145.91 ANNUAL DOMAIN NAME RENEWALS 1,384.35 ASSN OF DEFENSE COMMUNITIES CONF EXP-GERDES 255.25 CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES 250.67 CITY PARKS ART SELECTION COMMITTEE SUPPLIES 405.77 COMPUTER NETWORK EQUIPMENT 525.20 ADA ACCESS TRNG/BLDG OFFICIALS DUES-SHREEVE 711.84 DUBLIN PRIDE & BIKE TO WORK DAY SUPPLIES 4,374.87 EMPLOYMENT ADS, EMPLOYEE PROCESS SUPPLIES 608.14 ERGONOMIC EQUIPMENT 438.75 ERGONOMIC EQUIPMENT 1,312.80 EXECUTIVE TEAM RETREAT DEPOSIT 4.15.a Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 10 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 1,037.92 FLOODPLAIN MGMT CONF REG-PALUCK, OFFICE EQUIP 39.92 FUEL FOR POLICE MOTORCYCLE 534.79 HERITAGE CENTER SUPPLIES 1,400.00 ICMA MEMBERSHIP DUES FY19-20 TRIBBY 55.00 INT'L CODE COUNCIL DUES-RECINOS-SERNA 1,050.00 JUNIOR WARRIORS COACHES TRAINING 291.04 LEGISLATIVE ACTION DAY SEMINAR EXP-HERNANDEZ 1,671.45 TRAFFIC ENGINEERS CONF EXPENSES-KHAN 75.00 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE WEBINAR REG- A. SMITH 1,148.07 LIFEGUARD UNIFORMS & THE WAVE SUPPLIES 550.00 LOCAL HOUSING FINANCE ASSN CITY MEMBERSHIP 1,492.48 OFFICE & CITY COUNCIL SUPPLIES 127.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 487.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES & CIVIL ENGINEERS DUES-BOITNOTT 447.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES, GIFTS- SISTER CITY BRAY IRELAND 3,189.52 POLICE SUPPLIES 3,923.56 PRESCHOOL AND RECREATION SUPPLIES 962.98 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 156.00 PROF ENGINEERS LICENSE RENEWAL-RUSSELL 39.00 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OFFICIALS DUES-DHADWAL 2,017.78 PW OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE 4,965.52 SECURITY SAFE FOR EOC EQUIPMENT 235.79 SENIOR CENTER SUPPLIES & VAN TRIP FEES 228.97 SIGN FOR ADULT BOCCE LEAGUE SPONSORSHIP 40.00 SOUTH BAY ENGINEERS MEETING EXPENSE-SUCGANG 777.30 ST. PATRICK'S FESTIVAL ADS, HERITAGE CTR SUPPLIES 560.22 SUBDIVISION MAP ACT WORKSHOP REG-CHING/SHAFAQ 177.00 TEAM DUBLIN SUPPLIES 3,674.56 THE WAVE & CONCESSION SUPPLIES 205.16 THE WAVE CONCESSION SUPPLIES 1,037.77 THE WAVE SLIDE SIGNS, DISCOVER DUBLIN POSTCARDS 3,070.95 THE WAVE SUPPLIES 318.70 WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP SUMMIT EXPENSE-BUTLER 75.00 WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP SUMMIT REG-BUTLER Check Total: 54,611.23 Payments Issued 6/26/2019 Total: 54,611.23 06/27/2019 CALPERS CERBT 249,047.69 Q4 FY 18-19 OPEB CONTRIBUTION 06/27/2019 DUBLIN CROSSING, LLC 1,368,186.00 ACSPA ACQUISITION LOAN PMT 2 OF 4 Payments Issued 6/27/2019 Total: 1,617,233.69 06/28/2019 4LEAF INC. 111,008.00 BUILDING INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SVCS MAY 2019 06/28/2019 ACCLAIM PRINT & COPY CTR 680.69 SENIOR NEWSLETTER PRINTING & MAILING SERVICES 06/28/2019 ACTIVE NETWORKS, LLC 1,400.00 RECREATION SOFTWARE UPGRADE 06/28/2019 ADVANCED INTEGRATED PEST 945.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES MAY 2019 4.15.a Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 11 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/28/2019 ADVANCED MOBILITY GROUP 10,095.00 DOUGHERTY RD ADAPTIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS 4,005.00 SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS AVB & BURTON ST 7,265.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES Check Total: 21,365.00 06/28/2019 AFGHAN FOOTBALL SUPPORT ORG. 250.00 FALLON PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC 10,175.76 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 5/19/19 - 6/1/19 06/28/2019 AMADOR VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL 250.00 FALLON PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT 06/28/2019 AMADOR VALLEY INDUSTRIES LLC 2,933.08 COMMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM REIMBURSEMENT 06/28/2019 AMP PRINTING, INC. 238.50 CITY EVENTS & ACTIVITY PRINTING-FARMERS' MARKET 347.75 CITY EVENTS & ACTIVITY PRINTING-PICNIC FLIX 238.50 THE WAVE SIGNS PRINTING Check Total: 824.75 06/28/2019 ANGEL HOUSE CLAY ART 1,800.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 75.07 MAT SERVICE CIVIC CENTER JUN 2019 42.91 MAT SERVICE CORP YARD JUN 2019 39.03 MAT SERVICE SENIOR CENTER JUN 2019 112.13 MAT SERVICE SHANNON CENTER JUN 2019 Check Total: 269.14 06/28/2019 ARLEN NESS ENTERPRISE 2,928.35 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 06/28/2019 ARORA, AKSHAY 6,281.40 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICA 250.00 CIVIC CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 ASTEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 250.00 DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 AT&T - CALNET 3 115.51 SERVICE TO 06/01/19 1,157.20 SERVICE TO 06/12/19 401.87 SERVICE TO 06/14/19 Check Total: 1,674.58 06/28/2019 BAY AREA DISC ASSOC/COMMUNITY 250.00 DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 BAY AREA KOREAN BASEBALL ASSOC 250.00 DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 BAY AREA VINTAGE BASEBALL 250.00 FALLON PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 BAY UNITED FOOTBALL CLUB INC. 250.00 FALLON PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 BERMAN, JENNIFER 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 BSK ASSOCIATES INC. 15,770.47 COMPACTION TESTING SERVICES AUG 2018 06/28/2019 BYOG 892.26 PUBLIC WORKS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 596.95 REC STAFF & REC CLASS PARTICIPANT SHIRTS Check Total: 1,489.21 06/28/2019 CAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY INC 1,840.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 06/28/2019 CAL PERS 74,667.20 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 6/21/19 06/28/2019 CALIFORNIA SPIRIT ELITE, INC. 3,402.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 CAVALIERS RUGBY 250.00 EMERALD GLEN FIELDS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 9,735.94 DOCUMENT SCANNERS 06/28/2019 CERRUTI, DAELYN C. 1,000.00 UTILITY BOX ART PROJECT 06/28/2019 CHS CONSULTING GROUP 701.24 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 06/28/2019 CITY SERVE OF THE TRI-VALLEY 500.00 EMERALD GLEN FIELDS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 CIVICPLUS 240.00 CITY WEBSITE ANNUAL HOSTING FEE & SUPPORT 06/28/2019 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC 2,219.00 CIVIC CENTER INTERNET SERVICE JUN 2019 06/28/2019 COIT SERVICES, INC. 1,637.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES-LIBRARY 250.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES-THE WAVE Check Total: 1,887.00 06/28/2019 CONNAUGHTON, JUDITH A. 1,024.32 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 4.15.a Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 12 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/28/2019 CONSILIANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC 5,325.00 PD SITUATIONAL AWARENESS CAMERAS & SOFTWARE 06/28/2019 CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES 12,308.64 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES MAY 2019 06/28/2019 COX, BARTON 3,139.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 CPS HR CONSULTING 210.00 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS TRAINING - WILKINSON 06/28/2019 DEARDORF, MARTIN G. 524.65 VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION LUNCH PAYMENT 06/28/2019 DESAI, DEVANG 250.00 LIBRARY COMMUNITY RM RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 DUBLIN 4-H CLUB 200.00 RECREATION CAMP ENTERTAINMENT 06/28/2019 DUBLIN CRICKET LEAGUE 250.00 EMERALD GLEN FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 DUBLIN DAWGS 250.00 FALLON PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES 8,243.75 PLANNING & PERMITTING FEES-AVB ST0317 06/28/2019 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 157.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 06/28/2019 EAST BAY DIVISION LCC 25.00 BALLOT MEASURE TRAINING ACADEMY - BARGAS 06/28/2019 EAST BAY POOL SERVICE, INC. 596.25 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 8,620.00 POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE WAVE Check Total: 9,216.25 06/28/2019 ECS IMAGING INC. 20,078.75 DOCUMENT SCANNING SERVICES 06/28/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 17,402.22 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 6/21/19 06/28/2019 ENGEO INC 478.59 FALLON CROSSING GHAD MGMT 5/6-6/2/19 5,389.08 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MGMT MAY 2019 Check Total: 5,867.67 06/28/2019 EVERPRO KIDS 2,268.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, 4,100.00 2019 DUBLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY 06/28/2019 FEHR & PEERS 772.50 PARKING ASSESSMENT SERVICES 3,562.13 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY Check Total: 4,334.63 06/28/2019 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS, INC. 3,288.79 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE/STRMWTR RESOURCE PLAN 06/28/2019 GRAF, RUEDI 3,107.40 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 HANCHER, EVAN 199.11 REIMB FOR THE WAVE BADGING SOFTWARE 06/28/2019 HARRELL HARRIS PHOTOGRAPHY 675.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES-REC CAMP 450.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES-FARMERS' MARKET 600.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES-SHANNON CENTER FACILITY Check Total: 1,725.00 06/28/2019 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 4,690.00 2019 SLURRY SEAL DESIGN MAY 2019 06/28/2019 HD SUPPLY CONST & INDUSTRIAL 20.96 PUBLIC WORKS SAFETY GEAR FOR INTERN 06/28/2019 HSI, RON 1,080.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 I C M A 401 PLAN 2,155.23 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 6/21/19 06/28/2019 I C M A 457 PLAN 25,792.16 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 6/21/19 06/28/2019 ICLEI-LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 1,200.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 06/28/2019 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 57,542.89 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 6/21/19 06/28/2019 JAMES, NATHAN 29.00 LIVE SCAN REIMBURSEMENT 06/28/2019 JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY 470.00 FIRE ALARM PART REPLACEMENT-LIBRARY 06/28/2019 KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGINEERS 2,538.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 06/28/2019 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC. 1,493.39 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 06/28/2019 LACROSSE ASSIST PROJECT 250.00 EMERALD GLEN FIELDS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 LEE & ASSOCIATES RESCUE EQUIP 5,952.00 SAFETY TRAINING & EQUIPMENT INSPECTION 06/28/2019 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION 6,000.00 CIVIC SPARK PROGRAM 2018-2019 195.10 CIVIC SPARK PROGRAM MEETING REIMBURSEMENT Check Total: 6,195.10 06/28/2019 LSA ASSOCIATES INC. 3,702.50 SCHAEFER GHAD WEED ABATEMENT APR 2019 4.15.a Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 13 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/28/2019 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC. 3,400.00 CITY MANAGER EVALUATION 06/28/2019 MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. 6,897.25 IRON HORSE TRAIL CROSSING DESIGN SVCS APR 2019 06/28/2019 MAZE & ASSOCIATES 500.00 ACAP AUDIT SERVICES 2018 06/28/2019 MEIN, STEPHANIE 44.50 STAFF TRAINING SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 06/28/2019 MENDEZ, JENNIFER 58.15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/28/2019 MEREDITH FAMILY INC 6,052.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 MINUTEMAN PRESS 781.94 DUBLIN PRIDE WEEK CARD & BIKEWAY MAP GUIDES 06/28/2019 MIYAMOTO INTERNATIONAL, INC. 4,147.10 DESIGN REVIEW PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX PROJECT 06/28/2019 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 34,977.32 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN-DOUGHERTY RD IMPROV 15,200.00 TASSAJARA RD WIDENING COST ESTIMATE JAN 2019 Check Total: 50,177.32 06/28/2019 NAFSA/CAN-AM 250.00 DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 NGAI, JEFFREY AND TRACY 16.90 REFUND FTHB LOAN INTEREST OVERPAYMENT 06/28/2019 ORIGINAL WATERMEN, INC. 11,508.20 THE WAVE STAFF UNIFORMS 06/28/2019 ORION SAFETY PRODUCTS 748.62 POLICE EMERGENCY FLARES 06/28/2019 PACIFIC COAST FARMERS' MARKET 200.00 BIKE TO WORK EVENT SUPPLIES 06/28/2019 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 10,200.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES APR 2019 25,567.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 300.00 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL IMPROV PROJ MAY 2019 Check Total: 36,067.50 06/28/2019 PANDHER, JIT SINGH 150.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 PARMA 150.00 CITY MEMBERSHIP DUES 06/28/2019 PARNES, REBECCA 179.26 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2019 06/28/2019 PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 1,066.53 THE WAVE CONCESSION BEVERAGES 06/28/2019 PG&E 4,094.04 SERVICE TO 05/27/19 120.91 SERVICE TO 05/28/19 414.21 SERVICE TO 05/30/19 1,498.04 SERVICE TO 05/31/19 1,859.40 SERVICE TO 06/02/19 15,373.74 SERVICE TO 06/03/19 54.70 SERVICE TO 06/06/19 26,834.76 SERVICE TO 06/07/19 Check Total: 50,249.80 06/28/2019 PLAY-WELL TEKNOLOGIES 4,890.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 PLS SURVEYS, INC. 1,100.00 PLOTMAP/DESCRIPTION-EASEMENT-AVB/WILDWOOD 06/28/2019 PLUMBING CARE INC. 93.00 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE 06/28/2019 PSOMAS 870.00 GIS PORTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APR 2019 4,887.50 GIS PORTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MAR 2019 Check Total: 5,757.50 06/28/2019 PUBLIC BENEFIT TECHNOLOGY 465.00 CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO SERVICES MAY 2019 06/28/2019 QUARRY LANE SCHOOL 250.00 FALLON FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 QUETEL CORPORATION 1,574.00 ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT 12/1/18-11/30/19 06/28/2019 RAYNE OF SAN JOSE 156.83 WATER SOFTENER SVCS FIRE STATION 16 JUN 2019 175.95 WATER SOFTENER SVCS FIRE STATION 17 JUN 2019 131.85 WATER SOFTENER SVCS FIRE STATION 18 JUN 2019 Check Total: 464.63 06/28/2019 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB. INC. 2,946.00 FORENSIC DRUG & ALCOHOL EXAMS 06/28/2019 REVEL ENVIRONMENTAL MFG INC. 5,320.00 TRASH CAPTURE DEVICES MAINTENANCE 06/28/2019 SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR SVC INC 331.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE JUN 2019 4.15.a Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 14 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 06/28/2019 SDI PRESENCE, LLC. 3,132.50 ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLNG SELECTION ASSISTANCE 06/28/2019 SEROLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE 6,850.00 POLICE EVIDENCE ANALYSIS 06/28/2019 SERVICE CHAMPIONS 176.60 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE 06/28/2019 SIERRA DISPLAY, INC. 1,479.00 BANNER INSTALLATION & CHANGE-OUT SERVICES 738.50 MILITARY BANNER PROGRAM Check Total: 2,217.50 06/28/2019 SOUTHERN, KATHY 39.09 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT APR 2019 12.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAR 2019 1,816.23 REIMBURSEMENT FOR DUBLIN PRIDE SUPPLIES Check Total: 1,867.44 06/28/2019 SPECIAL EVENTS 1,096.50 TRI-VALLEY YOUTH EXPO EQUIPMENT RENTAL 06/28/2019 SQUAD ESTATES 2,154.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 06/28/2019 SURF TO SNOW ENVIRONMENTAL 8,646.50 SPILL RESPONSE ASSISTANCE & MRP INSPECTION 06/28/2019 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 903.00 MOVIE RENTAL - OUTDOOR MOVIE NIGHT 06/28/2019 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 76,944.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING PROJ 2,141.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT/INSP PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 50,348.00 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX CONSULTANT SERVICES Check Total: 129,433.00 06/28/2019 THE PIN CENTER 795.00 CITY OF DUBLIN LAPEL PINS 06/28/2019 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 2,657.64 INTERNET & PHONE SERVICE TO 07/08/19 06/28/2019 TRAFFICWARE GROUP, INC. 4,320.00 ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM -DOUGHERTY RD 06/28/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 21,670.00 CAL-ID REMOTE ACCESS NETWORK FY18-19 06/28/2019 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV 1,469.85 RECORD/TELEVISE CITY COUNCIL/PLNG MTGS MAY 2019 06/28/2019 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 3,705.07 EXTRA JANITORIAL SERVICES MAY 2019 19,649.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES JUN 2019 3,066.58 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES APR 2019 Check Total: 26,420.65 06/28/2019 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 630.85 DISPOSAL SERVICES JUN 2019 06/28/2019 UNITED SPORTS OF AMERICA 250.00 EMERALD GLEN FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 UNIVAR USA INC 1,047.52 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 06/28/2019 UNLOADED NORTH BAY SOFTBALL 250.00 FALLON PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 06/28/2019 US BANK - PARS 6,071.56 PARS: PE 6/21/19 06/28/2019 US FOODS, INC. 6,718.95 THE WAVE CONCESSION SUPPLIES 06/28/2019 VALLEY WINDOW CLEANING INC 150.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES-CORP YARD 145.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES-LIBRARY Check Total: 295.00 06/28/2019 VSI RISK MGMT & ERGONOMICS INC 235.00 ERGONOMIC EVALUATIONS 06/28/2019 WAGEWORKS, INC. 4,857.79 WAGEWORKS 2019: PE 6/21/19 06/28/2019 WALTER, RILEY 636.44 REIMB DRUG RECOGNITION EVALUATOR COURSE 06/28/2019 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,622.96 FLOOR SCRUBBING MACHINE PARTS 1,637.69 FLOOR SCUBBING MACHINE PARTS Check Total: 3,260.65 06/28/2019 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 577.50 PROJECT MGMT SVCS-DON BIDDLE COMMUNITY PARK Payments Issued 6/28/2019 Total: 929,825.78 07/03/2019 DSRSD 208,689.07 SERVICE TO 5/31/2019 Payments Issued 7/3/2019 Total: 208,689.07 4.15.a Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 15 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 07/09/2019 ALAMEDA COUNTY LAFCO 6,246.00 LAFCO APPORTIONMENT FOR FY19-20 07/09/2019 ALCO EMA, TREASURER 100.00 ALCO EMERGENCY MANAGER'S ASSN-CITY DUES 07/09/2019 ALPHA MEDIA LLC 3,200.00 THE WAVE RADIO ADVERTISEMENTS 07/09/2019 ARCHIVESOCIAL 2,388.00 SOCIAL MEDIA ARCHIVAL SOFTWARE 07/09/2019 ARORA, AKSHAY 27,271.21 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 BERGER, ROBERT L. 230.40 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 BLUEBEAM, INC. 2,970.00 DIGITAL PLAN CHECK REVIEW SOFTWARE MAINT 07/09/2019 BUDGET BLINDS OF PLEASANTON 13,619.64 SHANNON CENTER MOTORIZED WINDOW SHADES 07/09/2019 CAL PERS HEALTH PREMIUM 122,564.32 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM - JUL 2019 07/09/2019 CALED 100.00 CALED MEMBERSHIP DUES FY19-20 IARLA 100.00 CALED MEMBERSHIP DUES FY19-20 WETHERFORD Check Total: 200.00 07/09/2019 CAPIO 225.00 CA ASSN OF PUBLIC INFO OFFICIALS DUES-JACKMAN 07/09/2019 CASTRO VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS 198.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA 11,687.30 DELTA DENTAL PREMIUM - JUL 2019 07/09/2019 DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 390.00 THE WAVE POOL SLIDE INSPECTION FEES 07/09/2019 DIPIETRO & ASSOC. INC 2,965.19 AED PROGRAM ANNUAL FEE FY19-20 111.74 AED SUPPLIES Check Total: 3,076.93 07/09/2019 DIPPIN' DOTS, L.L.C. 1,056.08 ICE CREAM CONCESSION AT THE WAVE 07/09/2019 DSRSD 3,038.68 SERVICE TO 6/20/2019 07/09/2019 EAST BAY EDA 5,665.00 EAST BAY EDA CITY MEMBERSHIP DUES FY19-20 07/09/2019 ECS IMAGING INC. 21,360.00 LASERFICHE SOFTWARE ANNUAL MAINT FY19-20 07/09/2019 EVERPRO KIDS 1,194.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 567.90 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 6/21/19 07/09/2019 GREASE TRAP CLEANERS, LLC 250.00 THE WAVE CONCESSION GREASE CLEANING SERVICE 07/09/2019 GREEN, JILLIAN 1,464.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 HOLMES, SHEILA M. 379.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 HSI, RON 27.30 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 650.00 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL CONF REG-SHREEVE 07/09/2019 KASSAB, ZINA 1,020.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 KLEIST-CORWIN, JULAINA 288.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC. 362.97 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 07/09/2019 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION 1,500.00 GREEN CITIES CA CITY MEMBERSHIP DUES FY19-20 07/09/2019 MEREDITH FAMILY INC 3,576.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 MMANC 40.00 MMANC SUMMER SYMPOSIUM REG-WETHERFORD 07/09/2019 MULEY, THERESA 1,000.00 UTILITY BOX ART PROJECT 07/09/2019 MUMS COOKERY 1,405.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 3,927.39 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES DUES FY19-20 07/09/2019 PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY 209.40 THE WAVE CONCESSION BEVERAGES 07/09/2019 PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION 2,679.89 THE WAVE OPERATING SUPPLIES 07/09/2019 PRESERVATION ARTS, LLC 4,942.17 PUBLIC ART MAINTENANCE SERVICES 07/09/2019 REDDELL, DANIEL E. 426.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 108.80 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DEPT 07/09/2019 SELECT IMAGING 141.15 EMPLOYEE NAME PLATES 07/09/2019 SIERRA DISPLAY, INC. 5,327.21 BANNER INSTALLATION & CHANGE-OUT SVCS 07/09/2019 SQUAD ESTATES 3,742.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 STANFORD HEALTH -VALLEYCARE 175.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS 07/09/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 3,136,126.33 POLICE SERVICES 2/24/19-4/20/19 07/09/2019 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 6/21/19 4.15.a Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 16 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 07/09/2019 UNIVAR USA INC 882.85 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 07/09/2019 UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA 11,361.12 LIFE AND AD&D PREMIUM - JUL 2019 07/09/2019 URBAN FIELD STUDIO 84,354.79 DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SVCS APR 2019 93,740.54 DOWNTOWN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SVCS MAY 2019 Check Total: 178,095.33 07/09/2019 US FOODS, INC. 1,084.44 THE WAVE CONCESSION SUPPLIES 07/09/2019 VASUDEVAN, PRIYA 408.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/09/2019 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) 1,341.69 VISION INSURANCE PREMIUM - JUL 2019 07/09/2019 WAGEWORKS, INC. 501.50 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT FEES JUN 2019 501.50 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT FEES MAY 2019 Check Total: 1,003.00 Payments Issued 7/9/2019 Total: 3,591,643.63 07/10/2019 CHECKERS CATERING 5,316.48 EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION LUNCH CATERING Payments Issued 7/10/2019 Total: 5,316.48 07/12/2019 CAL PERS 80,377.12 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 7/5/19 07/12/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 21,371.85 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 7/5/19 07/12/2019 I C M A 401 PLAN 2,166.44 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 7/5/19 07/12/2019 I C M A 457 PLAN 29,152.01 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 7/5/19 07/12/2019 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 69,879.46 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 7/5/19 07/12/2019 US BANK - PARS 6,407.76 PARS: PE 7/5/19 07/12/2019 WAGEWORKS, INC. 3,857.79 WAGEWORKS 2019: PE 7/5/19 Payments Issued 7/12/2019 Total: 213,212.43 07/15/2019 4LEAF INC. 420.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 07/15/2019 ABTECH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3,597.68 HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENTS/SUPPORT 07/15/2019 ALAMEDA COUNTY WASTE MGMT AUTH 3,338.00 MEDIA CAMPAIGN FOR DISPOSAL OF USED OIL 07/15/2019 ALL 4 DANCE 14,178.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 AMADOR VALLEY INDUSTRIES LLC 2,159.26 COMMERCIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM REIMBURSEMENT 07/15/2019 AMY'S ENGRAVED SIGNS & AWARDS 120.73 EMPLOYEE NAMEPLATE - ADMIN AIDE 87.80 NAMEPLATES - ALTERNATE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Check Total: 208.53 07/15/2019 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 42.91 MAT SERVICES - SHANNON CENTER JUN 2019 07/15/2019 ARORA, AKSHAY 17,153.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 ART OF LIVING 250.00 STAGER GYM SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 AT&T - CALNET 3 80.87 SERVICE TO 06/14/19 286.31 SERVICE TO 06/26/19 122.17 SERVICE TO 06/27/19 115.51 SERVICE TO 07/01/19 Check Total: 604.86 07/15/2019 BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 19,190.68 CONCEPT DESIGNS/CONSTR DOCS FALLON PARK 07/15/2019 BKF ENGINEERS 13,768.51 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY DUBLIN BLVD 07/15/2019 BPXPRESS 830.51 PLAN PRINTING FOR PARKS WAYFINDING SIGNS 07/15/2019 BRICKS 4 KIDZ 1,646.40 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 BSK ASSOCIATES INC. 360.75 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES-CLOVER PARK 07/15/2019 BYOG 3,253.74 REC STAFF & REC CLASS PARTICIPANT SHIRTS 4.15.a Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 17 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 07/15/2019 CALDWELL, LORI 225.00 DUBLIN PRIDE MULCHING EDUCATION 07/15/2019 CALICO CENTER 3,628.16 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JAN-MAR 2019 07/15/2019 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 7,914.12 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 07/15/2019 CHAN, ROSA 390.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 CHANCE, KAREN 250.00 TED FAIRFIELD PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 11,909.92 INVESTMENT CONSULTING SERVICES JUN 2019 07/15/2019 CHASE, WILLIAM 31.08 REIMBURSE POLICE TRAINING EXPENSES 07/15/2019 CITY SERVE OF THE TRI-VALLEY 8,945.75 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT NOV 2018-APR 2019 07/15/2019 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC 2,219.00 CIVIC CENTER INTERNET SERVICE JUL 2019 07/15/2019 CORY PHELAN 250.00 DUBLIN SPORTS GROUND RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 45.00 ASSESSOR MAP UPDATES MAY 2019 07/15/2019 CUPERTINO ELECTRIC 250.00 FALLON SPORTS PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 DEAM, VALERIE 1,419.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 DUBLIN PANTHERS 250.00 STAGER GYM SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 80.88 STAGER GYM UTILITIES GAS 4/3/19-5/2/19 07/15/2019 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 1,931.25 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES MAY 2019 07/15/2019 EASTBURN, JESSICA 1,000.00 UTILITY BOX ART PROJECT 07/15/2019 ELEMISHA VOLLEYBALL 250.00 TED FAIRFIELD PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT 07/15/2019 EVERPRO KIDS 1,910.40 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 FBI BAND 1,200.00 FARMERS' MARKET ENTERTAINMENT 07/15/2019 FLEETWOOD MASK 3,000.00 FARMERS' MARKET ENTERTAINMENT 07/15/2019 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 565.11 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 7/5/19 07/15/2019 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS, INC. 5,624.83 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE/STRMWTR RESOURCE PLAN 07/15/2019 GHULAM, JANJUA 250.00 STAGER GYM SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 GUIDA SURVEYING INC. 696.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 07/15/2019 HAAG, JERRY P 1,875.00 CEQA DOCS TASSAJARA PRECISE PLAN JUN 2019 07/15/2019 HEADFIRST BASEBALL 250.00 FALLON SPORTS PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT 07/15/2019 HSU, MICHAEL 250.00 STAGER GYM RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 INCREDIFLIX, INC 2,739.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 JBMO GROUP BASKETBALL 250.00 STAGER GYM SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 JOHN "BOB" SEBRING 250.00 FALLON SPORTS PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 6,525.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 07/15/2019 KINDERMUSIK W/ MS LINDSAY & 840.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 KING, ARTHUR SCOTT 115.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1,260.00 BIKE IMPROV TREATMENT DUBLIN BLVD/SCARLETT CT 157.50 TRAFFIC IMPACT EVALUATION Check Total: 1,417.50 07/15/2019 KLUBER ASSOCIATES, INC 145.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 07/15/2019 MCE CORPORATION 9,497.42 LANDSCPE MAINTENANCE DSRSD JUN 2019 07/15/2019 MEYERS NAVE 1,107.00 LEGAL SERVICES ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS MAY 2019 07/15/2019 MINUTEMAN PRESS 34.72 CREEK CLEANUP POSTERS 07/15/2019 MOHAWK COMMERCIAL, INC. 16,854.99 CARPET REPLACEMENT-SENIOR CENTER 73,935.67 CARPET REPLACEMENT-SHANNON COMMUNITY CENTER Check Total: 90,790.66 07/15/2019 MVP HUSTLE 100.80 FALLON SPORTS PARK RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 NORCAL LEGACY BASKETBALL 190.00 STAGER GYM SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 OLBERDING ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 1,067.50 GHAD SUPPORT CONSULTING SERVICES MAY 2019 07/15/2019 ONLINE VIDEO PUBLISHING.COM 50.00 PA SYSTEM RENTAL-PRIDE FLAG EVENT 07/15/2019 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 900.00 EASTERN DUBLIN TIF UPDATE MAY 2019 07/15/2019 PEREZ, LORENA 498.00 REC CLASS REFUND 4.15.a Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 18 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 07/15/2019 PG&E 6,964.47 SERVICE TO 06/09/19 3,717.42 SERVICE TO 06/10/19 86.89 SERVICE TO 06/11/19 2,209.89 SERVICE TO 06/12/19 29,985.53 SERVICE TO 06/13/19 25,578.04 SERVICE TO 06/17/19 3,546.63 SERVICE TO 06/25/19 76.68 SERVICE TO 07/01/19 Check Total: 72,165.55 07/15/2019 PGADESIGN INC. 1,051.06 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SVCS-SUBAREA 3 07/15/2019 PHUNG, FINNIE 48.00 RECREATION REFUND 07/15/2019 PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION 1,786.60 THE WAVE OPERATING SUPPLIES 07/15/2019 PSOMAS 725.00 GIS PORTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MAY 2019 07/15/2019 RAPTORS LACROSSE 250.00 FALLON SPORTS PARK FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT 07/15/2019 REDDELL, DANIEL E. 324.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 244.80 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DEPT 07/15/2019 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP 982.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 3,856.25 PLANNING SERVICES MAY 2019 Check Total: 4,838.75 07/15/2019 SAMRA, KIRAN 46.20 RECREATION REFUND 07/15/2019 SANTILLAN, MARTHA 150.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 SHIR MARTIAL ARTS, LLC 76.30 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 SNG & ASSOCIATES INC. 11,619.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES APR 2019 18,013.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 Check Total: 29,632.25 07/15/2019 SOON MOVEMENT 250.00 EMERALD GLEN FIELD RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SVCS INC. 978.04 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT APR 2019 195.12 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT MAY 2019 Check Total: 1,173.16 07/15/2019 SQUAD ESTATES 4,422.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 ST. RAYMOND CHURCH 250.00 STAGER GYM SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 TEAM JUDAH 250.00 DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS FIELD DEPOSIT REFUND 167.25 STAGER GYM SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND Check Total: 417.25 07/15/2019 TECHSPLOSION 6,125.40 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 THUNDER SOX BASEBALL 250.00 DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS FIELD DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 TJ KRISTI CORPORATION 300.00 FUEL TANK INSPECTIONS APR-JUN 2019 07/15/2019 T-MOBILE USA, INC. 431.06 CELL PHONE SERVICES JUN 2019 07/15/2019 TRI-VALLEY HAVEN, INC 1,703.24 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT MAY 2019 07/15/2019 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 7/5/19 07/15/2019 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 3,813.29 POSTAGE FOR 2019-20 FALL/WINTER ACTIVITY GUIDES 07/15/2019 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 235.00 MARKETING MAIL PERMIT ANNUAL RENEWAL Vendor Total: 4,048.29 07/15/2019 WEISS, ROBIN S. 552.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/15/2019 WOLFPACK NORCAL BASKETBALL 250.00 STAGER GYM SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 07/15/2019 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 7,796.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 Payments Issued 7/15/2019 Total: 393,888.82 4.15.a Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 19 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 07/17/2019 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY 40,000.00 FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER LOAN – CHAN #19-01 Payments Issued 7/17/2019 Total: 40,000.00 07/18/2019 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 210.70 720 QUARTERLY FEDERAL EXCISE TAX RETURN Payments Issued 7/18/2019 Total: 210.70 07/22/2019 A SPECIAL TOUCH FUNERAL SVC 250.00 HERITAGE MUSEUM RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/22/2019 ACCOPSA -ALAMEDA COUNTY CHIEFS 500.00 ALAMEDA CO CHIEFS OF POLICE ANNUAL DUES-HOLMES 07/22/2019 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC 323.04 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 6/2/19 TO 6/15/19 07/22/2019 ARORA, AKSHAY 12,463.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/22/2019 BADAWI & ASSOCIATES 21,546.00 FINANCIAL AUDIT SERVICES FOR FY18-19 07/22/2019 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 162.18 LEGAL ADS 07/22/2019 BIG BOARDS ADVERTISING 600.00 DUBLIN NEW NEIGHBOR WELCOME PACKET POSTCARDS 07/22/2019 BIG O TIRES #7 202.47 POLICE VEHICLE TIRES & MAINTENANCE 07/22/2019 CALICO CENTER 1,407.12 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT APR-MAY 2019 07/22/2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS 1,950.00 BLDG OFFICIALS EDUCATION WEEK REG-5 ATTENDEES 07/22/2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS 1,703.70 GREEN BUILDING FEES APR-JUN 2019 07/22/2019 CHABOT-LAS POSITAS COLLEGE 18,725.00 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT FY18-19 07/22/2019 CHEN, CHANG 500.00 SENIOR CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 07/22/2019 CHITTINENI, RENUKA 50.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/22/2019 CINTAS CORP 51.61 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES 07/22/2019 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 172.50 MUNICIPAL CODE CODIFICATION 07/22/2019 COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR 619.94 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT FEB 2019 759.54 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JAN 2019 644.62 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT MAR 2019 Check Total: 2,024.10 07/22/2019 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 832.00 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES JUNE 2019 07/22/2019 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 8,566.18 SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING FEE APR-JUN 2019 07/22/2019 DIV OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 110.00 BUSINESS LICENSE ADMIN CASP FEE APR-JUN 2019 07/22/2019 DU-ALL SAFETY, LLC 362.50 SAFETY CONSULTING & INSPECTION SERVICES JUN 2019 07/22/2019 ELLIOTT, ELIZABETH 62.18 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JUN 2019 07/22/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 560.46 LABOR FORCE COMMUTE PATTERNS REPORT 07/22/2019 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR 950.06 VEHICLE RENTAL-SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT 07/22/2019 FRANKLIN, RHONDA 10.67 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JUN 2019 07/22/2019 GALLS, LLC 491.63 POLICE UNIFORM PATCHES 07/22/2019 GRANICUS, LLC. 23,436.00 AGENDA MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FY19-20 07/22/2019 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & ASSOC 5,128.48 SALES TAX AUDIT CONSULTING APR-JUN 2019 07/22/2019 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 72.05 BUILDING CODE MANUALS 07/22/2019 JOCHNER, RICH 36.71 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JUN 2019 07/22/2019 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 6,182.72 CEQA REVIEW WESTIN HOTEL MAY 2019 07/22/2019 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 44.60 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES JUN 2019 07/22/2019 LATITUDE GEOGRAPHICS GROUP 5,000.00 GEOCORTEX GIS ANNUAL SOFTWARE MAINT RENEWAL 07/22/2019 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 25.00 EAST BAY DIVISION MEETING 6/27/19 - IARLA 50.00 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES EAST BAY DIVISION MTG-JOSEY Check Total: 75.00 07/22/2019 LIVERMORE AUTO GROUP 273.14 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 07/22/2019 MCLANE, TEGAN 58.92 REIMBURSEMENT FOR FAMILY CAMP OUT SUPPLIES 31.38 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - JUN 2019 28.54 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - MAY 2019 4.15.a Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 20 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description Check Total: 118.84 07/22/2019 MEIN, STEPHANIE 66.58 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - MAY 2019 07/22/2019 MENDEZ, JENNIFER 16.41 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - JUN 2019 07/22/2019 MEYERS NAVE 67,608.86 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 2019 07/22/2019 OPEN HEART KITCHEN 5,625.00 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT APR-JUN 2019 07/22/2019 PACIFIC CREDIT SERVICES 49.69 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE COLLECTION FEES 07/22/2019 PARNES, REBECCA 129.67 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT-JUN 2019 07/22/2019 PG&E 112.77 SERVICE TO 06/26/19 156.98 SERVICE TO 06/28/19 244.12 SERVICE TO 06/30/19 19,522.93 SERVICE TO 07/01/19 13,162.54 SERVICE TO 07/02/19 9,551.98 SERVICE TO 07/09/19 Check Total: 42,751.32 07/22/2019 PHANTOM FIREWORKS 800.00 REFUND FIREWORKS BOOTH DEPOSITS 07/22/2019 PHOENIX GROUP INFO SYS. 434.05 PARKING CITATIONS PROCESSING MAY 2019 07/22/2019 PLAN JPA 587,538.00 GENERAL LIABILITY & PROPERTY PREMIUM FY19-20 112.50 INSURANCE CLAIMS EXPENSE JUN 2019 Check Total: 587,650.50 07/22/2019 PLAY-WELL TEKNOLOGIES 2,028.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/22/2019 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB. INC. 1,518.00 FORENSIC DRUG & ALCOHOL EXAMS 07/22/2019 SAFECHECKS 1,183.20 CHECK STOCK 07/22/2019 SAN RAMON VALLEY OFFICIALS AS 1,404.00 ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIATING SERVICES 07/22/2019 SELECT IMAGING 91.33 NAME BADGES FOR PW STAFF 378.33 PERSONNEL ACTION FORM PRINTING Check Total: 469.66 07/22/2019 SGT. PEPPER 1,800.00 FARMERS' MARKET ENTERTAINMENT 07/22/2019 SIERRA DISPLAY, INC. 306.00 BANNER INSTALLATION & CHANGE-OUT SVCS 07/22/2019 SQUAD ESTATES 1,519.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/22/2019 TIREHUB, LLC. 1,401.89 POLICE VEHICLE TIRES & MAINTENANCE 07/22/2019 TNT FIREWORKS, INC. 1,800.00 REFUND FIREWORKS BOOTH DEPOSITS 07/22/2019 TRB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 8,940.00 INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SERVICES JUN 2019 07/22/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 3,046.50 PARKING CITATIONS COLLECTED MAY 2019 07/22/2019 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV 52,447.00 OPERATING SUBSIDY FY19-20 (PMT 1 OF 2) 15,095.77 TRI-VALLEY PEG CONTRIBUTION FY19/20 (PMT 1 OF 2) Check Total: 67,542.77 07/22/2019 TRI-VALLEY HAVEN, INC 1,486.68 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JAN 2019 1,075.28 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT MAY 2019 Check Total: 2,561.96 07/22/2019 U S BANK ST. PAUL 196,434.06 SPECIAL TAX REVENUE COLLECTED CFD 2015-1 07/22/2019 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 3,330.05 RECREATION POSTCARD MAILING POSTAGE 07/22/2019 UNSWORTH, ANDREA 342.00 REC CAMP CANCELLATION REFUND 07/22/2019 US FOODS, INC. 1,653.97 THE WAVE CONCESSION SUPPLIES 07/22/2019 VERIZON WIRELESS 1,642.73 POLICE CELL PHONE SERVICE TO 07/03/19 836.22 POLICE SITCAM SIM CARD SERVICE TO 07/03/19 Check Total: 2,478.95 07/22/2019 VISIT TRI-VALLEY 2,500.00 VISIT TRI-VALLEY ANNUAL DUES FY 19-20 07/22/2019 WC3-WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANT 4,020.00 INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SERVICES JUN 2019 Payments Issued 7/22/2019 Total: 1,126,357.03 4.15.a Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 21 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 07/26/2019 CAL PERS 76,866.15 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 7/19/19 07/26/2019 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 17,083.96 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 7/19/19 07/26/2019 I C M A 401 PLAN 2,177.65 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 7/19/19 07/26/2019 I C M A 457 PLAN 25,475.61 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 7/19/19 07/26/2019 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 57,315.75 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 7/19/19 07/26/2019 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES, L.P. 108.80 TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE- FINANCE DEPT 07/26/2019 US BANK - PARS 6,641.01 PARS: PE 7/19/19 07/26/2019 WAGEWORKS, INC. 3,857.79 WAGEWORKS 2019: PE 7/19/19 Payments Issued 7/26/2019 Total: 189,526.72 07/29/2019 4LEAF INC. 2,574.00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS SERVICES-CIP MAY 2019 07/29/2019 ADVANCED INTEGRATED PEST 945.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS JUN 2019 07/29/2019 ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,174,978.67 FIRE SERVICES JUL 2019 07/29/2019 ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 59,395.05 ZONE 7 FEES COLLECTED APR-JUN 2019 07/29/2019 ALAMEDA COUNTY LIBRARY 144,984.00 DUBLIN LIBRARY SERVICES APR-JUN 2019 07/29/2019 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC 807.34 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 6/16/19 TO 7/5/19 07/29/2019 AMY'S ENGRAVED SIGNS & AWARDS 134.44 EMPLOYEE NAMEPLATE/ADA SIGNS-CASS 120.73 EMPLOYEE NAMEPLATES - N. JAMES/PERMIT TECH Check Total: 255.17 07/29/2019 ANNABATULA, MURALIDHAR 56.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 APEX GRADING 33,102.99 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MAINTENANCE 11,252.00 SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD MAINTENANCE Check Total: 44,354.99 07/29/2019 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 42.91 MAT SERVICE CORP YARD JUN 2019 69.22 MAT SERVICE SHANNON CENTER JUN 2019 Check Total: 112.13 07/29/2019 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING 26,668.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES MAY 2019 07/29/2019 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 204.88 LEGAL ADS MAY 2019 07/29/2019 BHATNAGER, MAYANK 84.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 CAL ATLANTIC HOMES 1,280.00 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEES 07/29/2019 CAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY INC 4,197.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES JUN 2019 07/29/2019 CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE 69,069.28 RETENTION DEPOSIT-PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG CONSTR 07/29/2019 CALIFORNIA SPIRIT ELITE, INC. 2,331.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/29/2019 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 11,469.95 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 07/29/2019 CHALLENGE ISLAND 3,450.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/29/2019 CHANDU, KARTHEEK 126.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 COIT SERVICES, INC. 734.00 CARPET CLEANING-SHANNON CTR JUN 2019 07/29/2019 COMCAST 2,300.00 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION INTERNET TO 6/30/19 07/29/2019 COMCAST 1,328.13 INTERNET/CABLE SVCS VARIOUS CITY DEPTS JUN 2019 07/29/2019 COMMUNICATION ACADEMY 4,053.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/29/2019 COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR 656.75 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT JUN 2019 735.86 COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANT MAY 2019 Check Total: 1,392.61 07/29/2019 CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES 12,308.64 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES JUN 2019 07/29/2019 CONVERGEONE, INC. 1,515.83 PHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE MAY 2019 07/29/2019 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 3.00 ASSESSOR MAP UPDATES JUN 2019 07/29/2019 DELL MARKETING L.P. 46,799.32 COMPUTER AND MONITOR REPLACEMENTS 07/29/2019 DIABLO PUBLICATIONS 6,000.00 "BEST OF THE EAST BAY" OPPORTUNITY ADS 4.15.a Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 22 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 07/29/2019 DIZON, EUNICE 104.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 DUBLIN ICELAND INC. 2,366.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/29/2019 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 2,493.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES JUN 2019 3,800.00 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES JUN 2019 Check Total: 6,293.75 07/29/2019 EAST BAY DIVISION LCC 50.00 LEAGUE OF CA CITIES DIVISION MEETING-KUMAGAI 07/29/2019 ENGEO INC 296.70 FALLON CROSSING GHAD MANAGEMENT JUN 2019 1,802.10 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MANAGEMENT JUN 2019 5,380.75 SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD MANAGEMENT JUN 2019 Check Total: 7,479.55 07/29/2019 FEDEX 74.20 EXPRESS SHIPPING 07/29/2019 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS 384.40 CRIME PREVENTION PROMOTIONAL SUPPLIES 07/29/2019 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 626.02 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 7/19/19 07/29/2019 GATES & ASSOCIATES, INC., DAVID L. 5,000.00 DESIGN SERVICES-DSG ALL ABILITIES PLAYGROUND 07/29/2019 GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC. 1,080.00 VILLAGE PARKWAY REPAIR GEOTECH INVESTIGATION 07/29/2019 GINN, MATT 88.50 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 GOLDEN STATE FLOW MEASUREMENT 1,666.17 WATER METER FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX PROJ 07/29/2019 GPS INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES 480.00 POLICE GPS TRACKER ANNUAL SERVICE FEE 07/29/2019 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC 616.05 EV CHARGING STATION PARTS-SHANNON CENTER 07/29/2019 GREENPLAY, LLC. 17,261.20 PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE 07/29/2019 GUIDA SURVEYING INC. 348.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES JUN 2019 07/29/2019 HD SUPPLY CONST & INDUSTRIAL 20.94 MARKING PAINT-DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS PARKING 07/29/2019 KAUR, SURINDER 26.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGINEERS 3,704.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES JUN 2019 07/29/2019 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 29,581.86 CEQA REVIEW WESTIN HOTEL 07/29/2019 KJC EDWARD LLC DBA TAKE1 SPORT 4,752.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/29/2019 KLUBER ASSOCIATES, INC 2,610.00 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SVCS APR 2019 3,443.75 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SVCS JUN 2019 3,190.00 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SVCS MAY 2019 Check Total: 9,243.75 07/29/2019 KNORR SYSTEMS, INC. 1,107.73 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 07/29/2019 KRISH, KARTHIK 26.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 LANLOGIC INC. 3,940.00 INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONSULTING SVCS JUN 2019 1,050.00 MALWARE SOFTWARE MONITORING JUN 2019 5,613.59 PHONE SERVER UPGRADES 3,937.50 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG NETWORK SUPPORT Check Total: 14,541.09 07/29/2019 LASHKARIAN, NAVID 192.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 500.00 LOCAL ROADS/STREETS NEEDS ASSESSMENT 07/29/2019 LEWIS, VERNA 35.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 LOEWKE PLANNING ASSOCIATES 8,265.00 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SERVICES JUN 2019 07/29/2019 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 6,225.00 GIS CONSULTING SERVICES JUN 2019 07/29/2019 MAK, SIU 144.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 MARTIAL ARTS AMERICA 2,091.60 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/29/2019 MCE CORPORATION 591,491.42 BUILDING MAINTENANCE JUN 2019 07/29/2019 MCPHERSON, SABRINA 72.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 MENGJI, RITESH 67.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 M-GROUP 6,467.50 PLANNING SERVICES JUN 2019 4.15.a Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 23 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 07/29/2019 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L, INC. 8,400.00 HOUSING PROGRAM ASSISTANCE JUN 2019 07/29/2019 MILLENNIUM CONSULTING ASSOC. 540.00 HAZMAT INSPECTION/ MONITORING-PSC PROJECT 07/29/2019 MUTHUKUMAR, AARTHI 1,000.00 UTILITY BOX ART PROJECT 07/29/2019 NARAYANAN, RAMYAA 112.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 OLBERDING ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 310.26 GHAD SUPPORT CONSULTING SERVICES JUN 2019 07/29/2019 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 4,930.00 2019 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT JUN 2019 9,095.00 PROJ MGMT DESIGN PHASE-DSG PLAYGROUND Check Total: 14,025.00 07/29/2019 PAREKH, AMIT 56.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 PG&E 58.94 SERVICE TO 07/08/19 28,795.26 SERVICE TO 07/09/19 3,376.85 SERVICE TO 07/15/19 Check Total: 32,231.05 07/29/2019 PHILLIPS, TYLER 24.94 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JUN 2019 07/29/2019 PIZZA GUYS 722.00 THE WAVE BIRTHDAY PARTY PACKAGE SUPPLIES 07/29/2019 PLEASANTON, CITY OF 14,318.48 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE DEBT PYMT APR-JUN 2019 07/29/2019 PLEASANTON, CITY OF 1,129.16 SUPERVISOR CERTIFICATE PROGRAM-BORJON/MILLION 07/29/2019 POTTS, CARISSA 244.00 REC CAMP CANCELLATION REFUND 07/29/2019 PYTHON RON'S REPTILE KINGDOM 425.00 FAMILY CAMPOUT ENTERTAINMENT 07/29/2019 RHAA 32,500.72 DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE MASTER PLN APR-JUN 2019 07/29/2019 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP 797.50 PLANNING SERVICES JUN 2019 07/29/2019 RUSHING, KATHLEEN F 250.00 FAMILY CAMPOUT ENTERTAINMENT 07/29/2019 RYDELL, SANDRA 165.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 SAUSAL CORPORATION 1,314,216.25 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 07/29/2019 SINGH, SAVINDER 26.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 SITEIMPROVE, INC. 4,800.00 SOFTWARE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FY19-20 07/29/2019 SMITH, ROBERT 12.18 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JUL 2019 07/29/2019 SU, BANG LIANG 108.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 SWAN ENTERTAINMENT CLIENT 3,000.00 FARMERS' MARKET ENTERTAINMENT 07/29/2019 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 72,701.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING 9,908.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 816.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES JUN 2019 15,508.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES SEP 2018 36,790.00 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX CONSULTANT SERVICES Check Total: 135,723.00 07/29/2019 TAMBUWUN, DAVID 173.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 TERRYBERRY 177.32 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS 07/29/2019 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 2,750.28 INTERNET & PHONE SVCS TO 08/08/19 07/29/2019 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 23,612.72 FUEL MAY 2019 07/29/2019 TRI-SIGNAL INTEGRATION INC 1,249.00 REPLACE FIRE ALARM POWER SUPPLY AT LIBRARY 07/29/2019 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 3,753.19 EXTRA JANITORIAL SVCS JUN 2019 4,040.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MAY 2019 Check Total: 7,793.89 07/29/2019 TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORT. COUNCIL 162,714.21 TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION FEES APR-JUN 2019 07/29/2019 TROY GROUP, INC. 340.00 CHECK PRINTER MAINT & SUPPORT FY19-20 07/29/2019 TSE, JERRY 80.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION AWG 449.93 WAGE GARNISHMENT: PE 7/19/19 07/29/2019 VALLEY WINDOW CLEANING INC 3,950.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES-THE WAVE 07/29/2019 WEE HOOP, INC. 1,663.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 4.15.a Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Print Date: 08/02/2019 City of Dublin Page 24 of 24 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019 Date Issued Payee Amount Description 07/29/2019 WEI, XIN 112.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 WHITE, JOHN/PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 507.00 REPLENISH POLICE SERVICES PETTY CASH 07/29/2019 WOMEN LEADING GOVERNMENT 50.00 WOMEN LEADING GOV'T DUES FY19-20-WETHERFORD 07/29/2019 YOUNG REMBRANDTS 1,860.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 07/29/2019 YU, YING 88.50 RECREATION REFUND 07/29/2019 ZHAO, TINA 173.00 REC CLASS REFUND 07/29/2019 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 9,528.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES JUN 2019 1,402.50 PROJECT MGMT SVCS-DON BIDDLE COMMUNITY PARK Check Total: 10,931.25 Payments Issued 7/29/2019 Total: 4,130,062.36 07/30/2019 DSRSD 12,102.37 SERVICE TO 6/30/2019 07/30/2019 ZHENG, XIUHUI 1,702.87 DEVELOPER DEPOSIT REFUND 07/30/2019 CALPERS 912,721.00 CALPERS UNFUNDED LIABILITY PREPAY CLASSIC/PEPRA Payments Issued 7/30/2019 Total: 926,526.24 Grand Total for Payments Dated 6/1/2019 through 7/31/2019: 17,435,706.36 Total Number of Payments Issued: 806 4.15.a Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: 1. Payment Issuance Report for June-July 2019 (Payment Issuance Report for June 2019 and July 2019) Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Sponsorship of the Innovation TriValley Leadership Group's 2040 Vision Plan Prepared by: Hazel L. Wetherford, Economic Development Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider supporting Innovation TriValley Leadership Group's 2040 Vision Plan in the amount of a $5,000 sponsorship. The 2040 Vision Plan will convene a cross-sector group of stakeholders to compile a vision plan for the Tri -Valley region centered around four economic drivers: transportation and mobility; land use/housing/transit-oriented development; workforce development; and innovation/entrepreneurship. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report and approve a sponsorship of the Innovation TriValley Leadership Group's 2040 Vision Plan in the amount of $5,000. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Innovation TriValley Leadership Group is requesting a commitment of $5,000 for the 2040 Vision Plan which is currently not budgeted. If the City Council approves the proposed request, a Budget Change Form has been prepared and attached to this staff report. DESCRIPTION: Innovation TriValley Leadership Group (ITV) is led by a collective of business leaders and influencers committed to connecting the businesses, research labs, educational institutions, and civic leaders in the Tri-Valley region. This collaborative force is generating job growth and economic vitality for the region by advocating f or the Tri- Valley as an innovation hub with an unparalleled quality of life. Its focus is on workforce development, education, transportation, housing, marketing the Tri -Valley and creating an innovation ecosystem which benefits everyone who lives and work s in the region. In 2014, ITV partnered with the Bay Area Council Economic Institute (BACEI) and published the Tri-Valley Rising report which aimed at taking inventory of the Tri-Valley 4.16 Packet Pg. 269 Page 2 of 3 region’s assets and resources, explaining its impressive economic suc cess, identifying challenges that could threaten to impede its future growth, and providing policy recommendations to ensure its continued vitality. In 2018, ITV published an update to the Tri-Valley Rising report which builds upon the findings and information presented in the first report, while also exploring more policy options for local and regional stakeholders to better connect and strengthen the Tri - Valley’s economy as it continues to grow. The City of Dublin was a sponsor to the 2018 Tri-Valley Rising report. In the 2018 update of the Tri-Valley Rising report, the BACEI recommended that ITV convene a cross-sector group of stakeholders to compile a 2040 Vision Plan for the region. The report identified four key areas where coordinated planning in th e Tri-Valley can lead to better economic outcomes: 1. Transportation and Mobility 2. Land Use/Housing/Transit-Oriented Development 3. Workforce Development 4. Innovation/Entrepreneurship ITV in partnership with BACEI proposes to inform, convene, and moderate a serie s of workshops that will act as inputs to a 2040 vision plan. Public officials, business leaders, and other key members of the Tri-Valley economy will be invited to participate in a series of four half-day workshops – each focusing on one of the four key areas for coordinated planning identified in the 2018 Tri-Valley Rising report. After these workshops are completed, BACEI will use their findings as inputs for a small “summit” of elected officials, city planners, national laboratory representatives, and key business stakeholders. From the initial data/case study work, four workshops, and the summit, ITV and BACEI will then create a final report that outlines the consensus recommendations for the future of the Tri-Valley. The recommendations will be broken down into government actions, private/non-profit programs, and advocacy efforts. As part of ITV’s effort to develop a 2040 Vision Plan for the Tri -Valley, they have requested a $5,000 sponsorship to support the funding of the plan. Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the request for sponsorship. If the City Council approves the $5,000 sponsorship, a Budget Change Form has been prepared which is included as an attachment to this staff report. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2018 Tri-Valley Rising Report 4.16 Packet Pg. 270 Page 3 of 3 2. 2040 Innovation TriValley Vision Plan Fact Sheet 3. Budget Change Form 4.16 Packet Pg. 271 PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW FOR Attachment 1 of Item 4.16 4.16.a Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: 1. 2018 Tri-Valley Rising Report (ITV 2040 Vision Plan Sponsorship) 2040 Innovation TRIVALLEY Vision Plan Fact Sheet What Happens When the Public/Private Sector Come together to Create their Future? “The TRIVALLEY is an economic juggernaut, growing faster in jobs and population than any other part of the Bay Area. Our region of Danville, Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton, San Ramon and two counties is a major job center, home to two national labs and 450 technology jobs with a regional GDP of $42 billion. Because of this a long -term plan is required to ensure that the region can continue to be a destination for families and jobs while maintaining its quality of life.” TRIVALLEY Rising 2018 Report With the 2040 Plan the TRIVALLEY Could Create an Optimum Future for the Regions: Transportation Systems Housing, Land Use, Transit Oriented Housing Workforce Development Innovation Ecosystem Youth who will be invited to participate in the process 2040 Innovation TRIVALLEY Vision Plan Process The Bay Area Council Economic Institute (BACEI) proposes to inform, convene, and moderate a series of workshops that will act as inputs to a 2040 vision plan for the region. In collaboration with Innovation TRIVALLEY Leadership Group, they will invite public officials, business leaders, and other key members of the TRIVALLEY economy to participate in a series of half -day workshops—each focusing on one of the four key areas for coordinated planning identified in the 2018 report. The Economic Institute will have three key functions/deliverables for each convening: Pre-convening white papers BACEI will prepare 10-15-page white papers to be distributed in advance of each workshop, focusing on TRIVALLEY data and best practices/case studies from other regions. Creation of workshop agenda In consultation with Innovation TRIVALLEY Leadership Group, BACEI will prepare agendas for each workshop, which will include presentation of data/case studies, organization of an expert panel, and moderation of break-out groups. Collection of workshop findings BACEI will compile summary papers of each session, potentially including graphic recordings, that can be disseminated to workshop participants and other key TRIVALLEY constituents. After these workshops are completed, they will use their findings as inputs for a small “summit” of elected officials, city planners, national laboratory representatives, and key business stakeholders. Within this half - day event, the group will focus on: 1. Creating a shared vision for the TRIVALLEY in 2040 2. Identifying the topic areas in which regional solutions are most effective 3. Finding opportunities for new housing construction 4. Prioritizing potential transportation and other infrastructure projects 5. Uncovering partnership opportunities between jurisdictions or private-public partnerships 6. Leveraging activities already underway to build enhanced workforce development and innovation/entrepreneurship activities 4.16.b Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: 2. 2040 Innovation TriValley Vision Plan Fact Sheet (ITV 2040 Vision Plan Sponsorship) The Bay Area Council Economic Institute has been the leading think tank focused on the economic and policy issues facing the San Francisco/ Silicon Valley Bay Area, one of the most dynamic regions in the United States and the world’s leading center for technology and innovation. A valued forum for stakeholder engagement and a respected source of information and fact-based analysis, the Institute is a trusted partner and adviser to both business leaders and government officials. BACEI will prepare the 2040 Innovation TRIVALLEY Vision Plan for Innovation TRIVALLEY Leadership Group. Through its economic and policy research and its many partnerships, the Institute addresses major factors impacting the competitiveness, economic development and quality of life of the region and the state, including infrastructure, globalization, science and technology, and health policy. It is guided by a Board of Trustees drawn from influential leaders in the corporate, academic, non-profit, and government sectors. The Institute is housed at and supported by the Bay Area Council, a public policy organization that includes hundreds of the region’s largest employers and is committed to keeping the Bay Area the world’s most competitive economy and best place to live. Innovation TRIVALLEY Leadership Group (ITV) is led by business leaders and influencers committed to connecting the businesses, research labs, educational institutions, and civic leaders in the TRIVALLEY region. This collaborative force is generating job growth and economic vi tality for the region by advocating for the TRIVALLEY as an innovation hub with an unparalleled quality of life. Its focus is on workforce development, education, transportation, housing, marketing the TRIVALLEY and creating an innovation ecosystem which benefits everyone who lives and works in the region. ITV Partners benefit from access to top business leaders, state and regional political leaders and stakeholder groups, and personal involvement in essential projects like the recently announced 2040 Innovation TRIVALLEY Vision Plan. We need your investment to deliver the 2040 Vision Plan for our region. Dale Kaye Lynn Naylor Tim Sbranti 818.395.0742 925.989.2373 925.858.5303 Send checks to: Innovation TRIVALLEY Leadership Group 5960 Inglewood Dr. #201 Pleasanton, CA 94588 Or invest online at https://innovationtrivalley.org/partners/join-now 4.16.b Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: 2. 2040 Innovation TriValley Vision Plan Fact Sheet (ITV 2040 Vision Plan Sponsorship) Budget Change Reference #: From Un-Appropriated Reserves X Budget Transfer Between Funds From Designated Reserves Other Account Amount Account Amount 1001.8401.64011 $5,000 8/20/2019 Posted By: Date: As Presented at the City Council Meeting **********Finance Use Only********** CITY OF DUBLIN City's sponsorship of Innovation TRIVALLEY’s 2040 Vision Plan REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 BUDGET CHANGE FORM DECREASE BUDGET AMOUNT INCREASE BUDGET AMOUNT EXP: General Fund - Economic Development - Community Contribution City Council's Approval Required C:\Users\hazelw\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\KHKY2DPU\01_8401 Innovation TriValley_082019 4.16.c Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: 3. Budget Change Form (ITV 2040 Vision Plan Sponsorship) Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Actions Taken During Council Recess, Budget Appropriation, Adopt Resolution Approving the Filing of Application for Specified Grant Funds, and Authorization for Purchase Agreements for Playground Equipment, Safety Surfacing and Pre-Engineered Concession/Restroom Building - Imagine Playground Prepared by: Michael Boitnott, Capital Improvement Program Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive a report on the administrative actions taken during the City Council recess between July 17, 2019 and August 19, 2019 of awarding a construction contract for the Imagine Playground at Dublin Spor ts Grounds project (CIP No. PK018); and will consider approving a budget change and authorizing purchase agreements with Specified Play Equipment Company and Romtec, Inc. for the playground equipment, safety surfacing, and a pre-engineered concession/restroom building at Dublin Sports Grounds Project; and will consider adopting the Resolution approving application for Dublin Sports Grounds all -abilities playground specified grant funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report on administrative actions taken during City Council recess, and adopt the Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Play Equipment and Safety Surfacing from Specified Play Equipment Company and Pre-Engineered Concession/Restroom from Romtec Inc. and approve the budget change for the Imagine Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds (CIP No. PK018); and adopt the Resolution Approving the Application for Dublin Sports Grounds All-Abilities Playground Specified Grant Funds. FINANCIAL IMPACT: As approved in the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program, the total budget for the Imagine Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds project is currently $4,000,000, funded by the General Fund. The low bid for site improvements and demolition, purchase and installation of play equipment, safety surfacing, and restroom structure, plus contingency, is $4,125,000. 4.17 Packet Pg. 276 Page 2 of 3 Project soft costs are estimated at $675,000, which would bring the total project cost to $4,800,000. Additional funds of $800,000 are needed to execute the purchase agreements and cover other project costs, including Staff and construction management expenses. The City has been approved for Local Assistance Specified Grant Funding in the amount of $1,400,000 from the State of California, Natural Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation, a nd the Office of Grants and Local Services for this project. This new funding source will entirely offset the additional $800,000 related to the construction costs and will reduce the General Fund contribution to the project by $600,000. DESCRIPTION: The Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), adopted by City Council, includes the Imagine Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds CIP No. PK0518 (Attachment 1). On July 16, 2019, by Resolution No. 78 -19, the City Council authorized the City Manager or designee to consider, approve, award, and execute the contract and other associated administrative matters needed for the project within existing budgetary appropriations during the City Council’s scheduled recess. The City is using a multi-prime project delivery method due to the specific play equipment for users at all-abilities playground and its safety surfacing and the use of a pre-engineered concession/restroom building. A multi-prime project delivery will have the City contract directly with the contractor for the site demolition and site improvements, and contract directly with a specialty contractor for the playground equipment and safety surfacing and a specialty contractor for the concession/restroom building. From the initial concept design phase, Staff and the design consultants have been working closely with BCI Burke Company and LLC YossoGroup, Inc. dba Specified Play Equipment Company (SPEC) on the playground equipment and safety surfacing and with Romtec, Inc. on the concession/restroom building. Staff believes it is best to use a multi-prime delivery method and to contract directly with SPEC and Romtec, Inc. for their specialties, and contract directly with a site contractor for the site demolition and site improvements. The project’s site improvements and demolition bids were released on July 8, 2019. A total of three (3) sealed bids were received on August 13, 2019, ranging from $1,659,000 to $1,778,000. A summary of the bids is provided as (Attachment 2). The low bid of $1,659,000 was submitted by Suarez & Munoz Construction Inc. Staff reviewed the bid results, checked references, and necessary licenses, and recommended to the City Manager to award the site improvements and demolition to Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc. as the lowest responsive bidder. To facilitate the approval of contract change orders and to avoid construction delay, it is requested that the City Manager be authorized to approve change orders up the contingency amount of $166,000. The resolution will authorize this change as it relates to the project. Play Equipment and Restroom Structure Procurement 4.17 Packet Pg. 277 Page 3 of 3 Staff is requesting authorization to purchase the supply and installation of the play equipment and safety surfacing from SPEC in an amount not to exceed $1,800,000 through OMNIA Partners. Staff is also requesting authorization to purchase the design, supply and installation of the pre-engineered concession/restroom building from Romtec Inc. through BuyBoard for the not to exceed amount of $500,000. Section 2.36.100(B)(9) of the Dublin Municipal Code allows for exceptions to the typical public bidding process when the City is able to procure items from a competitive bid process administered by another public agency. Purchases made in this manner in excess of $45,000 require City Council approval (Section 2.36.090). SPEC has a pricing agreement listed in OMNIA Partners (formally US. Communities) and Romtec Inc. has a pricing agreement listed with BuyBoard, both of which offer local agencies access to a variety of competitively bid agreements for products and services that meets the bidding exception cited above. Staff anticipates the project to begin in September 2019 with the completion of the improvements anticipated in summer 2020. State Grant Funding The City of Dublin was approved to receive Local Assistance Specified Grant Funding in the amount of $1,400,000 from the State of California, Natural Resources Agency, Department of Parks and Recreation, and the Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) for the Dublin Sports Grounds All-abilities Playground. This specified grant is appropriated by the 2019-20 State Budget (Chapter 29, statues of 2019). A resolution approving the filing of applications is required in order to continue with the grant process. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: A copy of this staff report was sent to Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc., Specified Play Equipment Company, and Romtec, Inc. ATTACHMENTS: 1. PK0518 – Imagine Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds 2. Bid Tabulation PK0518 3. Resolution Authorizing the Purchase Agreements with SPEC and Romtec, Inc. for Imagine Playground (CIP No PK0518) 4. Exhibit A to Resolution SPEC Agreement 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement 6. Budget Change Form 7. Resolution Authorizing Application of Dublin Sports Grounds All-Abilities Specified Grant 4.17 Packet Pg. 278 Number PK0518ProgramPARKSPRIOR YEARS 2018-2019 BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 FUTURE YEARS ESTIMATE TOTALS9100 $4,362 $85,762 $48,400$138,5249200$298,000 $76,600$374,6009400$1,576,876 $1,875,000$3,451,8769500$35,000$35,000$4,362 $1,995,638 $2,000,000$4,000,000PRIOR YEARS 2018-2019 BUDGET 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 FUTURE YEARS ESTIMATE TOTALS1001 $4,362 $1,995,638 $2,000,000$4,000,000$4,362 $1,995,638 $2,000,000$4,000,000ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACTTOTALIMAGINE PLAYGROUND AT DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS2018-2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMGeneral FundSalaries & BenefitsContract ServicesImprovementsMiscellaneousESTIMATED COSTSFUNDING SOURCETOTALPROJECT DESCRIPTIONThis project provides for the installation of a new all-abilities playground, replacing the existing playground, and for the replacement of the restroom and picnic facilities at the Dublin Sports Grounds located at Dublin Boulevard and Civic Plaza. City Council approved the concept design on February 19, 2019. Construction will begin in 2019.This project is funded with a General Fund reserve designation.ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT:None.MANAGING DEPARTMENT: Public Works4.17.aPacket Pg. 279Attachment: 1. PK0518 – Imagine Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds (Imagine Playground Award) Project Name: Imagine Playground At Dublin Sports GroundsBid Date: August 13, 2019BASED BIDITEMQty.UNITUnit Cost Extension Unit Cost Extension Unit Cost Extension11 LS $1,659,000.00 $1,659,000.00 $1,674,895.00 $1,674,895.00 $1,778,000.00 $1,778,000.00TOTAL$1,659,000.00$1,674,895.00 $1,778,000.00PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTDESCRIPTIONBase BidRemoving and properly disposing of existing landscaping/irrigation, hardscape, portion of the parking lot, picnic area, associate amenities and constructing new site improvements for an all-abilities playgroundNo AlternatesSuarez & Munoz Construction, Inc.CITY OF DUBLINENGINEERING DIVISIONBID SUMMARYProject No. : PK0518Robert A. Bothman ConstructionGuerra Construction Group14.17.bPacket Pg. 280Attachment: 2. Bid Tabulation PK0518 [Revision 1] (Imagine Playground Award) RESOLUTION NO. - 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * AUTHORIZING PURCHASE AGREEMENTS WITH SPECIFIED PLAY EQUIPMENT COMPANY AND WITH ROMTEC, INC. FOR THE IMAGINE PLAYGROUND AT DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS, CIP NO. PK0518 WHEREAS, Section 2.36.100 (B)(9) of the Dublin Municipal Code allows for exceptions to the typical public bidding process when the City is able to procure items from a competitive bid process administered by another public agency; and WHEREAS, Specified Play Equipment Company has a valid pricing agreement publicly bid by OMNIA Partners, and Romtec, Inc. has a valid pricing agreement public ly bid by BuyBoard, which meets the Municipal Code provision for a publicly bid agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 2.36.090 of the Dublin Municipal Code requires City Council approval of purchased items with a cost greater than or equal to forty-five ($45,000); and WHEREAS, the cost of supplying and installing the play equipment and safety surfacing under the cooperative purchasing agreement with BCI Burke Company, LLC furnished and installed by YossoGroup, Inc. dba. Specified Play Equipment Company will not exceed $1,800,000.00 and the cost of supplying and installing the pre-engineered concession/restroom building under Romtec, Inc. cooperative purchasing agreement will not exceed $500,000.00, for the Imagine Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds , CIP No. PK0518 (“Project”). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby waive the competitive bidding requirement and authorizes the City Manager or his designee as Purchasing Agent to procure the play equipment, safety surfacing and installation from YossoGroup, Inc. dba. Specified Play Equipment Company under a purchasing agreement public bid by OMNIA Partners, at a cost not to exceed $1,800,000.00 attached hereto as Exhibit A and the pre-engineered concession/restroom building and installation from Romtec, Inc. under a purchasing agreement public bid by BuyBoa rd, at a cost not to exceed $500,000.00 attached hereto as Exhibit B. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby receive the report on actions authorized in Resolution No. 78 -19 for the Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the Project Contract Change Orders for the Site Improvements and Demolition Contract with Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc. based on the appropriated funds designated for the Project up to the contingency amount of $166,000. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2019, by the following vote: AYES: 4.17.c Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: 3. Resolution Authorizing the Purchase Agreements with SPEC and Romtec, Inc. for Imagine Playground (CIP No PK0518) NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ________________________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk 4.17.c Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: 3. Resolution Authorizing the Purchase Agreements with SPEC and Romtec, Inc. for Imagine Playground (CIP No PK0518) PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW FOR Attachment 4 of Item 4.17 4.17.d Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to Resolution SPEC Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) Page 1 of 5 18240 North Bank Rd. Date Roseburg, OR 97470 8/9/2019 P: 541‐496‐3541 F: 541‐496‐0803 E: service@romtec.com Customer: Quantity Extended Price 1  $                  200,299.34  8.31%(16,644.87)$                    183,654.46$             9.25% 16,988.04$                         259,620.48$                       10,436.69$                          270,057.17$             3,590.00$                 474,289.67$          *All prices listed above are F.O.B. Roseburg, OR. Freight prepaid and added. Delivery will be in accordance with a mutually agreed upon  timeline as stated in the Romtec Inc. Notice to Proceed document. ROMTEC INC. PURCHASE ORDER TOTAL *This proposal includes the design & engineering by Romtec Inc. to produce a complete plan set that will meet the architectural and  engineering code required in your state. In some cases local code may vary from typical state requirements and may result in a change in  price that could not have been anticipated at time of quote. *This proposal is effective for 90 days from above date; thereafter all prices are subject to change without notice *Non‐Agency orders must be placed on Romtec Inc. purchase order forms. *Shipping price is effective for 30 days from above date; thereafter the shipping price is subject to change without notice. *Quote based on ‐ roof snowload of 25psf, IBC Seismic Design Category: C, Design Wind Speed: 115 MPH, Allowable Soule Bearing: 1500  psf, Occupancy Type: U, Construction: VB. *A payment schedule and terms will be established after the Purchase Order is received. Romtec Inc. will often require a deposit payment  upon receipt of the signed Submittal Approval & Notice to Proceed document. Any deposit amount will be defined with the forthcoming  payment schedule. *Romtec Inc. reserves the right to update its purchase order price if, for any reason, the time frame from received of Purchase Order to  subsequent Scope of Supply and Design Submittal Aproval with Notice to Proceed by Romtec Inc.'s Customer exceeds 90 days. Freight to: Dublin, CA ESTIMATED TAX BASED ON RATE OF: BuyBoard DISCOUNT: Available only to members of the BuyBoard  Cooperative Purchasing Network. INSTALLATION BOND FEE ROMTEC INC. SUPPLY SUBTOTAL ROMTEC INC. SERVICES SUBTOTAL PROPOSAL/PO #512‐16 Imagine Playground City of Dublin Lorin Jensen 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 Building Proposal Description Combined Romtec Model 2086 and Romtec Model 2043 w/ added options See the Romtec Scope of Supply dated: 8‐7‐19 4.17.e Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) Page 2 of 5 Customer/Owner Authorized Signature Date Romtec Inc. Authorized Signature             Date Customer/Owner Printed Name Romtec Inc. Printed Name Customer/Owner Company *The above prices, Terms & Conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. Romtec Inc. is authorized to begin work on the Scope  of Supply and Design Submittal document, which the customer will review prior to approval and Notice to Proceed. Additionally, the  customer will complete the Customer & Project Information request as quickly as possible so that payment terms, and if applicable  bonding requirements, can be established. The customer understands that by acceptiing this proposal they are issueing a Purchase  Order for the project detailed above, but that production will not begin and delivery or installation dates cannot be established until  the customer has granted submittal approval and notice to proceed. *Design Services includes an initial unsealed plan set on 11 x 17 format, and one sealed revision in response to comments. In  any additional revisions, if sealing or changing in plan set size are requested or required, an additional design service will be  charged.   *The pricing defined in this proposal is contingent upon the customer signing this form and agreeing to the Romtec terms and conditions  defined in this proposal.  Any modifications to the terms and conditions defined herein may result in a price increase. *This proposal includes estimated sales or use tax based on the information available at the time of quoting. All sales are assumed subject  to sales and use tax unless the customer provides Romtec with a resale certificate or proof of exemption. The applicable sales tax is  subject to change on final invoice. 4.17.e Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) Page 3 of 5 Deviation from payment Time is of the essence with respect to Buyer’s payment of the purchase price, and timely payment shall not be delayed or  excused for any reason. Payment agreement between Buyer and other parties, or failure by other parties to pay Buyer or  perform any agreement with Buyer shall not result in delay of payment to ROMTEC. ROMTEC does not accept partial  payments, any offsets, and/or retainage against the Purchase Order price. Should Buyer not act according to the terms of  payment for any reason, the terms granted will be revoked and any remaining goods or services not yet delivered are  subject to pre‐payment terms whereby payment, in full, is due 10 days prior to delivery. Any amounts not paid when due  shall bear interest at the rate of 15 percent per annum or the highest lawful rate applicable, if such rate is less than 15  percent, from the date payment was due. The ROMTEC Warranty becomes null and void when payment is more than 5  business days past due. Tax Unless otherwise indicated on the ROMTEC quote or purchase order, any sales, use, consumption, value added or other  goods/services based tax imposed by a state; county/local or other agency with jurisdictional authority is excluded from this  order. Buyer is responsible for remitting any taxes that are applicable. Credit terms Upon execution of the Purchase Order agreement, Customer shall provide a completed credit application (subject to  Romtec’s approval) and evidence of payment bond securing Customer’s obligation to pay the balance of the purchase price  in full. Credit terms are conditional and may be modified subsequent if in the opinion of Romtec management, new  information or conditions warrant such modification. Payment terms To be established by Romtec’s accounting department upon receipt of credit application. Proposal Terms & Conditions Romtec, Inc. (ROMTEC) will provide the scope of supply as listed on the purchase order related hereto in  accordance with the following terms and conditions: Terms of Payment Romtec offers terms upon approved payment bond and credit approval by Romtec’s accounting department (to be  determined at the time the Purchase Order is finalized and executed). Payments may be by check or wire transfer, Visa,  MasterCard, Discover or American Express (a separate fee will be charged for payments exceeding $20,000 made by credit  card and for all COD deliveries). Romtec may agree to accept COD payment by bank certified funds or cashier’s check if a  carrier selected by Romtec ships materials. Change Orders All Change Orders must be signed by the Buyer. Prices stated herein are valid for 90 days from the purchase order date, or  two weeks from the purchase order date if unsigned, at which time ROMTEC may adjust its price if cost factors warrant. A  change order will apply (charges will vary depending on the circumstances) for the following design/engineering events: (i)  incurred costs related to ROMTEC making more than two revisions of plan documents in response to review comments, (ii)  incurred costs of “resealing” plan documents, and (iii) incurred costs of changing plan set sizing from the standard 11” x 17”  format. Additionally, any modifications (for any reason) to ROMTEC’s Scope of Supply & Design Submittal, prior to formal  approval, may result in a price adjustment. Any modification to ROMTEC’s Scope of Supply & Design Submittal, after formal  approval, requested or required by Buyer for any reason shall be performed by ROMTEC at Buyer’s expense, as follows: (i)  Buyer shall submit a written description of the modifications to ROMTEC; (ii) within 14 days of receipt of Buyer’s description,  ROMTEC shall provide to Buyer a written price quote for the modifications requested; (iii) Buyer shall pay the Change Order  Invoice to ROMTEC in accordance with payment terms. 4.17.e Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) Page 4 of 5 Delay of Project Should progress of the project be delayed to where ROMTEC cannot produce and deliver six months from the date the  purchase order is signed, Buyer will reimburse ROMTEC for all design and administrative expenses related to the completion  of the Scope of Supply & Design Submittal as compensation for design services rendered, as well as expenses related to the  authorized purchase or production of items requested. Additionally, Buyer agrees to accept cost increases that may occur  during the time the project is delayed. Terms of Delivery ROMTEC will not be liable for any delay in the performance of orders or contracts, or in the delivery or shipment of goods,  or for any damages suffered by the Buyer by reason of such delay, when such delay is beyond ROMTEC’s control. All goods  are shipped F.O.B. Roseburg, Oregon, which means that the risk of loss or damage to the goods and risk of delays in transit  passes to the Buyer when the goods are duly delivered to the carrier at Roseburg, Oregon. ROMTEC has no control over  arrival time of a shipment, and shall not be responsible for delays in shipments once the goods leave ROMTEC's plant. a. Procedures for Handling Products. ROMTEC's suggested procedures for handling products are as follows: (1) All ROMTEC materials, whether palletized or separated from a pallet, must be handled per the instructions  detailed in the ROMTEC Scope of Supply & Design Submittal with respect to the specified model of ROMTEC  restroom facility or component. (2) All material received from, but not manufactured by ROMTEC must be handled per the specific handling  instructions of the manufacturer of the material. (3) PROPER HANDLING EQUIPMENT, ITS SUPPLY AND OPERATION ARE STRICTLY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE  BUYER. Description of Products and Warranty ROMTEC’s Scope of Supply & Design Submittal document (provided subsequent to this order) contains & defines ROMTEC’s  complete offering of its products and services (as applicable). In addition, Section 4 of the Scope of Supply & Design  Submittal defines ROMTEC’s Limited One Year Warranty. Time of Shipment and Delivery Unless otherwise specified on the purchase order, ROMTEC may ship goods pursuant to an order at any time after the goods  are completed and ready for shipment. Further, unless payment has been made in advance, if a carrier holding a ROMTEC  shipment ordered by a Buyer is ready to deliver the goods to the Buyer, the Buyer agrees to accept the goods at the carrier's  earliest possible delivery date and time. Store & Invoice If Buyer delays shipment, regardless of the reason for delay, ROMTEC is permitted to invoice and the Buyer accepts the  obligation to pay ROMTEC under its agreed upon payment terms, using the date the order was ready for shipment as the  invoice date (if prepayment or COD terms apply, payment is due within 7 days from the time of delay). Once the order is  invoiced, the materials shall become property of the agency/contractor. Further, ROMTEC may at its sole discretion invoice  the Buyer for a minimum of $450 per month for on‐site storage. Deliveries that are delayed by the Buyer may be canceled  by ROMTEC and the goods returned to ROMTEC at its discretion. Any costs or difficulties arising from the Buyer’s act in  delaying receipt of ROMTEC’s shipments are the complete responsibility of the Buyer. The Buyer agrees to pay for the  complete shipping cost if ROMTEC elects to cause the goods to be returned to ROMTEC or delivered to another Buyer. Cancellation Mutual acceptance of the purchase order indicates notice for ROMTEC to proceed with the provision of design services  required in completing its Scope of Supply & Design Submittal. Should Buyer cancel its purchase order prior to granting  Notice to Proceed in producing the building kit package, Buyer shall pay ROMTEC 40% of the project total as compensation  for design services rendered. In addition, Buyer shall reimburse all expenses related to the authorized purchase or  production of items requested prior to approval of the Scope of Supply & Design Submittal. ROMTEC requires that Buyer  indicate approval of its supply offering by executing the signature page of its Scope of Supply & Design Submittal document  and Notice to Proceed. Upon granting ROMTEC approval of its Scope of Supply Design Submittal and Notice to Proceed in  producing the building kit package, the Buyer is waiving any rights to cancel its purchase order. ROMTEC does not accept  returns or exchanges. Contract Documents Together with this Purchase Order, the following constitute the “Contract Documents” and the entire contract between the  parties, either written or oral: (i) ROMTEC’s Scope of Supply & Design Submittal, and (ii) Change Order form (if applicable). 4.17.e Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) Page 5 of 5 This Purchase Order agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall constitute one agreement,  even though all parties do not sign the same counterpart. Waiver Waiver of any party of strict performance of any provision of this Purchase Order agreement shall not be a waiver of or  prejudice any party’s right to require strict performance of the same provision in the future or of any other provision. Counterparts Controlling Provisions The terms and conditions of this Purchase Order shall supersede and control any provisions, terms, and conditions contained on any confirmation order, Purchase Order, or other writing the Buyer may give or receive, and the rights of the parties shall  be governed exclusively by the provisions, terms, and conditions hereof. Binding effect This Purchase Order agreement shall be effective and in force only when signed by Buyer and also signed by ROMTEC.  ROMTEC must consent to any assignment of this Purchase Order agreement in writing. Subject to any restrictions upon  assignment, this Purchase Order agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the heirs, legal representatives,  successors, and assigns of the parties. Notice All notices required by this Purchase Order agreement shall be in writing addressed to the party to whom the notice is  directed at the address of that party set forth in this Purchase Order agreement and shall be deemed to have been given for  all purposes upon receipt when personally delivered; one day after being sent, when sent by recognized overnight courier  service; two days after deposit in United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail; or on the date  transmitted by facsimile. Any party may designate a different mailing address or a different person for all future notices by  notice given in accordance with this paragraph. Modification In any dispute involving the interpretation or enforcement of this agreement or involving issues related to bankruptcy  (whether or not such issues relate to the terms of this agreement), the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the  non‐prevailing party reasonable attorney fees, paralegal fees, costs, disbursements, and other expenses incurred by the  prevailing party in the dispute, including those arising before and at any trial, arbitration, bankruptcy, or other proceeding,  and in any appeal or review thereof. In addition, the amount recoverable by the prevailing party shall include an amount  estimated as the fees, costs, disbursements, and other expenses that will be reasonably incurred in collecting a monetary  judgment or award, or otherwise enforcing any order, judgment, award, or decree entered in the proceeding. Interpretation The paragraph headings are for the convenience of the reader only and are not intended to act as a limitation on the scope  or meaning of the paragraphs themselves. This agreement shall not be construed against the drafting party. Severability The invalidity of any term or provision of this agreement shall not affect the validity of any other provision. Attorney Fees If Buyer fails to pay any amount when due, and ROMTEC incurs any expenses in pursuit of collection, Buyer agrees to pay  the reasonable attorney fees (whether or not litigation is commenced) and other costs of such collection. No modification of this Purchase Order agreement shall be valid unless it is in writing and is signed by all of the parties. This agreement shall be interpreted and enforced according to the laws of the state of Oregon. The parties irrevocably  submit and consent to the jurisdiction of the circuit courts of the State of Oregon for Douglas County, with respect to  litigation regarding any dispute, claim or other matter related to this contract. 4.17.e Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) ROMTEC PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SUPPLY & INSTALLATION SERVICES Romtec Inc. Page 1 of 4 This scope letter will be superseded by the Romtec Scope of Supply, Design and Install Submittal at the time Romtec is directed to proceed with creation of its complete Scope of Supply, Design and Install Submittal package (after Romtec’s receipt of a Purchase Order). Project Name: All-Abilities Playground Location: Dublin, CA Date: 8/7/2019 This scope letter is for the building supply and installation. See section 7 for the owner supplied items that are not supplied by Romtec. Romtec, Inc. has forty years of experience supplying and constructing site built, pre-engineered, packaged building kits. It is our mission to lead our industry as the premier designer, builder, and expert of restrooms and similar park structures for both public and private use. We are the architects, engineers, and manufacturer of all Romtec products. The design for all Romtec buildings and structures are site specific and designed with the customer to fit to each project’s particular needs. The following is a detailed scope of products and services that will be included as part of the Romtec building package and installation services. 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW Combined Romtec Model 2086 and Romtec Model 2043 with added Options to be owned by the City of Dublin for the new Imagine Playground in Dublin, CA. 2. DESIGN Romtec works through the complete design with every customer to provide a structure that best fits each project. Since Romtec is providing a pre-engineered building kit, Romtec has the capability to match any existing park structure or park theme and customers can choose to use any finish, product, and material without limitation. Once a design is complete Romtec assists the customer through the design review, building department submission, and the installation of the building. A. DESIGN SERVICES BY ROMTEC 1. Romtec’s work shall include the design of the architectural, mechanical, structural, and electrical components that will be required for this building. 2. The building will be designed as a complete, packaged building to be delivered to the job site to be constructed on site by the contractor. 3. Romtec will provide complete submittal documentation in the Romtec standard submittal format for review. This will include complete plans on the Romtec pre-engineered building structure, construction drawings, and related data sheets and specifications for everything within the footprint of the building. a. Romtec will provide the building plan view and elevation with the Romtec Scope of Supply and Design Submittal (SSDS) electronically for review and approval. b. Romtec will revise the SSDS per the review comments. c. Once the design is approved, Romtec will provide a sealed plan set stamped by an Engineer licensed in California for building department review. d. Romtec will provide (2) sealed plan sets. Note: Pricing allows for one revision in response to comments. Should additional revisions be requested, Romtec will provide a change order for the additional design work. e. The Romtec plan set standard size is 11” x 17”. Note: If a larger plan set size is required it will result in a price increase. 3. ROMTEC SCOPE OF SUPPLY Once produced, the building package will arrive on organized pallets that are separated into stages for ease of installation. Because of this packaging style, there are no shipping limitations for the building package. A. STRUCTURE The Romtec building package has been quoted with the specific product colors noted below. Changes to these color selections may result in a price increase. Customer to select colors from each manufacturer’s specified color chart for block, roofing, steel finishes, etc. The following items relative to the building structure will be supplied by Romtec. 1. Concrete Masonry Units - CMU 4.17.e Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) ROMTEC PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SUPPLY & INSTALLATION SERVICES Romtec Inc. Page 2 of 4 a. Exterior walls will be constructed of smooth-face, mortar joint, concrete masonry units (concrete blocks). b. Pixelated effect, Gray block on bottom and Tan block on top. (see drawings for block pattern) 2. Rain Guard anti-graffiti coating. 3. Interior wall finish shall be latex epoxy paint. 4. Interior floor finish will be sealed concrete. 5. Sanitary tile cove base on interior walls. 6. Wire weave vents for natural ventilation. a. Vents to be powder coated Dublin Green. Note: Powder coat color to be selected by the owner from the RAL standard color chart. 7. Doors, frames and hardware. a. Doors and frames to be powder coated Dublin Green. Note: Powder coat color to be selected by the owner from the RAL standard color chart. b. Stainless steel, ball bearing hinges. c. Heavy duty door closures. d. Doors to have stainless steel kick plates. e. Doors to have aluminum thresholds and sweeps. f. Interconnected locks with occupancy indicator on restroom doors. g. The City to provide timer locks for the restroom doors. 8. Roll-up concession door with stainless steel counter. 9. Roofing materials a. Glulam beams b. 2x6 tongue and groove decking c. Roofing shall be Fabral, 29 gauge, GrandRib 3 roof panels with exposed fasteners. Note: Roofing color shall be selected by the owner from the manufactures standard color chart. d. Cantilever roof extension in the front and the back of the building. e. Gutters and cast iron down spout boot. B. RESTROOM & PLUMBING FIXTURES The following fixtures will be supplied by Romtec: 1. Wall mount, back supply, stainless steel toilets with concealed, sensor, low flow flush valves. 2. Wall mount, stainless steel sinks with motion sensor, hard wired faucets with transormer. 3. 18” x 36” mirrors. 4. Wall mount, stainless steel 3-roll toilet paper dispensers. 5. Wall mount, stainless steel napkin disposals. 6. Wall mount, stainless steel paper towel dispensers. 7. Wall mount, stainless steel seat cover dispensers. 8. Wall mount, stainless steel soap dispensers. 9. Diaper deck and child protection seat in each family restroom only. 10. Mop sink with faucet in mechanical room. 11. Surface mount, stainless steel, non-refrigerated drinking fountains with freeze protection. 12. All gender restroom signage. C. CONCESSION ROOM FIXTURES The following concession room fixtures will be supplied by Romtec: 1. Wall mount, china hand wash sink with lever handle faucet. 2. Stainless steel, 3-bay utility sink with faucet. D. ELECTRICAL FIXTURES The following electrical fixtures will be supplied by Romtec: 1. Exterior lighting a. Wall mount, vandal resistant LED light fixtures. 2. Interior lighting a. Surface mount, 48” LED light fixtures. 3. Electric tank, 50gallon water heater with 2gallon expansion tank. 4. Wall mount, white, 15 second hand dryers. 5. Main breaker panel sized for the building components. a. 100 amp, single-phase, indoor. 4. FABRICATION & INSTALLATION A. The following are included in the fabrication and installation services provided by Romtec: 1. Permits, fees and special inspections. 4.17.e Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) ROMTEC PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SUPPLY & INSTALLATION SERVICES Romtec Inc. Page 3 of 4 2. Excavation and pouring of footings, foundation and slab 3. Masonry (concrete) grout and rebar 4. Plumbing and electrical rough in 5. Connection to the site plumbing and electrical utilities within 10’ of the building. 6. Typical fasteners such as nails, staples, and screws. 7. Sealing of all exposed wood 8. Painting of interior walls, doors and frames 9. Installation and trim out of the complete Romtec supplied building package 10. Romtec to re-mount the City’s existing rain sensor system to the new building. Note: Romtec will coordinate the running of conduit for the rain system with the owner’s rep or installer. B. The installation quote by Romtec assumes the following: 1. A prevailing wage job. 2. That the jobsite is semi-truck accessible 3. No bonding requirements Note: Should bonding become a requirement, Romtec will supply a bond to cover the installation portion of the job only. Further, the customer will incur additional charges that will be added to the quote. 4. A 6 day work week with available work hours of 7:00 AM – 7:00 PM Note: Reductions in this schedule will result in a price increase. 5. Union workers NOT required. Note: If Romtec is required to hire union workers, a change order will be issued. 6. Romtec is not responsible for assuring specific timelines are met or for liquidated damages incurred if specific timelines are not met. Romtec is an Oregon based crew and will perform the installation of the Romtec pre- engineered packaged building on the earliest available date. 7. Romtec has not been provided or made aware of any geotechnical reports for this project. Romtec is not responsible for any additional costs incurred by the installer if the foundation is increased due to local soil conditions. 8. Romtec’s proposal is based on a 24” deep footing. Any changes to this footing design will result in a price increase. 5. DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Romtec’s freight estimates are based on delivering the product on a 48’ to 53’ flatbed or van truck and trailers, or as close as we can legally get to the site. Overall dimensions of the truck and trailers are the following: 70’ overall length, 102” wide and 168” high. B. Freight quotes are only good for 30 days and are subject to change without notice. 6. WARRANTY & LIMITATIONS A. The building and all its associated components will be warranted against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of not less than one (1) year from date of final acceptance. Acceptance is defined as the date Romtec Inc.’s Installation Services are completed or one year and six months from delivery of the building and all its associated components or the date that the building and all its associated components are ready to deliver whichever comes first. B. Tiles will crack over time due to multiple factors including building settlement, wall movement, and other factors. Romtec cannot guarantee that the tiles in the building will not eventually crack. Romtec considers the repairing of cracks as a maintenance issue, and not a warranty issue. In other words, the tiles in the building will eventually crack and will not be covered under the building warranty. C. Romtec does not provide a warranty for metal roofing. Metal roofing manufacturers intend for their roofing to be installed immediately upon delivery from the factory. All project circumstances are different and Romtec cannot guarantee that metal roofing is installed within the timeframe allowed from the manufacturer. Therefore, Romtec does not warrant metal roofing. D. All concrete cracks on the surface eventually. This can occur within the first week after the concrete is poured or years after. Surface cracks in concrete are a maintenance issue for the owner to fill over time. Cracks in concrete are not a warranty issue. E. Smooth face block can have a significant variation in the color and texture due to the manufacturing process. Smooth face block should never be used as an architectural finish. It should always be either painted over or have siding covering it. Romtec does not guarantee uniform color or texture of block, or warranty that any aspect of block color or texture will maintain over time. 7. OWNER SCOPE OF SUPPLY AND SERVICES (NOT BY ROMTEC) A. OVERVIEW While Romtec is serving as the installer for this turnkey building package, the owner is responsible for the following items relative to the Romtec building package. B. STRUCTURE 4.17.e Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) ROMTEC PRELIMINARY SCOPE OF SUPPLY & INSTALLATION SERVICES Romtec Inc. Page 4 of 4 The following items relative to the structural components will be supplied by the owner: 1. The building pad must be level and compacted to within 6” of the finish floor elevation before Romtec arrives to begin installation. The pad must be prepared per the requirements of the geotechnical report (if one is available). Note: Any site grading or removal and replacement of fill materials for the building pad must be completed prior to Romtec’s arrival. Romtec’s installation services do not include excavation beyond what is necessary for forming and pouring the concrete footings and slab. 2. All materials, equipment and labor for exterior slabs, walkways and sidewalks beyond those shown on the Romtec plan set. C. UTILITIES The following items relative to the utilities will be supplied by the owner: 1. The plumbing utilities brought to within 10 feet of the building pad. 2. The electrical utilities brought to within 10 feet of the building pad. D. GENERAL EXCLUSIONS 1. Unless otherwise stated, Romtec is not proposing to meet any Buy America standard for materials. 2. The following items will be supplied by the owner: a. Payment & performance bonding b. Rock excavation c. Demolition of existing structures d. Removal of excavated materials e. Site grading or asphalt paving f. Masonry pavers g. Grease traps h. Booster pumps &/or pressure reducing valves i. Backflow check valves j. Fire alarm & fire suppression equipment k. Irrigation Equipment l. Lighting equipment not attached to the building m. Landscaping n. Plumbing freeze protection o. Site plans 3. Site visits by Romtec and/or Romtec’s design professionals are not included in the proposal. Note: If required, Romtec will issue a change order. 4. Romtec’s proposed building design is based on the following standard design loads. The standard design loads are “average” for locations across the Country. Local design loads specific to this project may require changes to the building design, which may result in a price increase due to increased material costs. a. Roof Snow Load: 25 psf b. IBC Seismic Design Category: D2 c. Design Wind Speed: 110 mph d. Allowable Soil Bearing: 1500 psf e. Occupancy Type: U f. Type: VB 5. Romtec does not provide LEED/Green submittals as a standard service. Romtec can assist in providing documentation for products that may meet LEED/Green standards, but Romtec does not provide or fill out LEED credit forms. Unless specifically included in Romtec’s proposal and quote, Romtec does not supply materials with the intent of meeting LEED standards. Any changes due to LEED or Green building requirements will result in a change order and increased lead times.” E. DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING 1. The owner will assume responsibility for adequate protection of materials from weather, damage, and pilferage or all warranties, expressed or implied may be voided. 2. Do not throw away the Operations & Maintenance manuals that are provided by some manufacturers in their packaging. It is the responsibility of the owner to collect and maintain these manuals. 4.17.e Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) 1/24/20191045CALIFORNIA ALL-ABILITIES PLAYGROUND JSDRAWN BY:SHEET NO.PROJECT#:DATE:PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: REV. DATE: BYREVISIONSCUSTOM RESTROOM/CONCESSION/STORAGE BUILDING 2015 ROMTEC, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, ADAPTED OR FURTHER DISTRIBUTED, AND NO BUILDINGS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED FROM THESE PLANS, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ROMTEC, INC. C PRELIMINARYCUSTOMMODEL#:18240 NORTH BANK ROAD - ROSEBURG, OR 97470 (541) 496-3541 FAX (541) 496-0803 GATES & ASSOCIATES 1FLOOR PLANABCD1FLOOR PLANSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"THESE PLAN VIEW AND ELEVATION DRAWINGS ARE APRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL REPRESENTATION OFTHE BUILDING. ALL DIMENSIONS, FEATURES ANDCOMPONENTS SHOWN ON THESE PRELIMINARYDRAWINGS MAY OR MAY NOT BE PART OF THEQUOTE. PLEASE REFER TO THE "SCOPE OF SUPPLYAND SERVICES" LETTER PROVIDED WITH YOUR QUOTEFOR ROMTEC'S PROPOSED SCOPE OF SUPPLY.GABLE VENT6SYMBOLLEGENDDESCRIPTIONAREA/QUANTITYINTERIOR CEILING LIGHTS11EXTERIOR WALL LIGHTS12FLOOR DRAIN8ELECTRICAL OUTLET1HBWALL HYDRANT1HB-1WALL FAUCET1FDFDFDDFCONCESSIONLAVLAV6" WOOD FRAMED WALLWALL TYPE SCHEDULE8" REINFORCED CONCRETE MASONRYBLOCK WALL WITH MORTAR JOINTS,GROUTED SOLID ALL CELLS RUNNINGBOND PATTERN.6" REINFORCED CONCRETE MASONRYBLOCK WALL WITH MORTAR JOINTS,GROUTED SOLID ALL CELLS RUNNINGBOND PATTERN.LAVLAV21'-4"5'-0"SLAB 41'-8"SLAB31'-4" SLAB36'-8"B2A2CONCRETE WALK(SUPPLIED BY INSTALLER)4'-8" x 4'-0" ROLL-UPCONCESSION WINDOWFDWCWCWCROOF LINEHB-1HDWALL MOUNT HAND DRYER7SDSOAP DISPENSER7DIAPER DECK2DIAPER DECKPTDTOWEL DISPENSER7TPTHREE ROLL TP DISPENSER6NDNAPKIN DISPENSER6CHILD SEAT2MIRROR7FDFDFDLAVWCWCWCLAVLAVSTORAGE102/05/2019JS202/11/2019JSEF-11VENTILATION PACKAGEROMTEC 2.1DDDDADAGENDERNEUTRALADAGENDERNEUTRALADAGENDERNEUTRALADAGENDERNEUTRAL303/27/2019JSADAGENDERNEUTRALADAGENDERNEUTRAL707/02/2019JS4.17.ePacket Pg. 293Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) 1/24/20191045CALIFORNIA ALL-ABILITIES PLAYGROUND JSDRAWN BY:SHEET NO.PROJECT#:DATE:PROJECT: SHEET TITLE: REV. DATE: BYREVISIONSCUSTOM RESTROOM/CONCESSION/STORAGE BUILDING 2015 ROMTEC, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THESE PLANS AND DRAWINGS MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, ADAPTED OR FURTHER DISTRIBUTED, AND NO BUILDINGS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED FROM THESE PLANS, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ROMTEC, INC. C PRELIMINARYCUSTOMMODEL#:18240 NORTH BANK ROAD - ROSEBURG, OR 97470 (541) 496-3541 FAX (541) 496-0803 GATES & ASSOCIATES 2FLOOR PLAN THESE PLAN VIEW AND ELEVATION DRAWINGS ARE APRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL REPRESENTATION OFTHE BUILDING. ALL DIMENSIONS, FEATURES ANDCOMPONENTS SHOWN ON THESE PRELIMINARYDRAWINGS MAY OR MAY NOT BE PART OF THEQUOTE. PLEASE REFER TO THE "SCOPE OF SUPPLYAND SERVICES" LETTER PROVIDED WITH YOUR QUOTEFOR ROMTEC'S PROPOSED SCOPE OF SUPPLY.102/05/2019JSFGFG21'-4"BELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"PIXILATED 8" x 16" CMU SMOOTHFACE CONCRETE BLOCKWALL FULLY REINFORCEDRUNNING BOND PATTERN. (GRAYON BOTTOM, TAN ON TOP)METAL ROOF48"O.H.48"O.H.FGFGWALL MOUNT LIGHT, TYP4'-8" x 4'-0" ROLL-UPCONCESSION WINDOWAELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"36'-8"WIRE MESH VENT, TYP.GLULAM BEAMS, TYP.202/11/2019JS122GENDERNEUTRALRESTROOMGENDERNEUTRALRESTROOMHBGUTTERS &DOWNSPOUTSCAST IRONDOWNSPOUT BOOT,TO DOWNSPOUTBEND303/27/2019JSGENDERNEUTRALRESTROOMRAIN SENSOR, JUNCTIONBOX, & LIGHT, BY OTHERSRAIN SENSOR, JUNCTIONBOX, & LIGHT, BY OTHERS707/02/2019JS4.17.ePacket Pg. 294Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) CUSTOM 07/02/191045JSRENDERRENDERTHESE PLAN VIEW AND ELEVATION DRAWINGS ARE APRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL REPRESENTATION OFTHE BUILDING. ALL DIMENSIONS, FEATURES ANDCOMPONENTS SHOWN ON THESE PRELIMINARYDRAWINGS MAY OR MAY NOT BE PART OF THEQUOTE. PLEASE REFER TO THE "SCOPE OF SUPPLYAND SERVICES" LETTER PROVIDED WITH YOUR QUOTEFOR ROMTEC'S PROPOSED SCOPE OF SUPPLY.1SIDE VIEWSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2ISOMETRIC VIEWSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3FRONT VIEWSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"GATES & ASSOCIATES ALL-ABILITIES PLAYGROUND- OPTION 1 CALIFNORNIA 4.17.ePacket Pg. 295Attachment: 5. Exhibit B to Resolution Romtec Inc Agreement (Imagine Playground Award) Budget Change Reference #: From Un-Appropriated Reserves X Budget Transfer Between Funds From Designated Reserves X Other Account Amount Account Amount PK0518.9400.9401 (Improvements - Not Bldg)$800,000 3500.9501.49999 (Transfers In)$800,000 PK0518.2403 (2403.9501.89101) - State Park Grant Transfers Out $1,400,000 PK0518.1001 (1001.9501.89101) - General Fund - Transfers Out ($600,000) 2403.0000.47261 - State Park Grant $1,400,000 8/20/2019 Posted By:Date: As Presented at the City Council Meeting **********Finance Use Only********** CITY OF DUBLIN REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 BUDGET CHANGE FORM DECREASE BUDGET AMOUNT INCREASE BUDGET AMOUNT City Council's Approval Required EXP: Imagine Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds (PK0518) Funding for playground equipment and improvements. The City receives a State park grant in the amount of $1.4M for the project, which reduces the funding need from General Fund by $600,000. \\cc-uem\users\carolines\appdata\roaming\iqm2\minutetraq\dublinca@dublinca.iqm2.com\work\attachments\4961 4.17.f Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: 6. Budget Change Form (Imagine Playground Award) RESOLUTION NO. XX - 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * * * APPROVING APPLICATION FOR DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS ALL-ABILITIES PLAYGROUND SPECIFIED GRANT FUNDS W HEREAS, the State Department of Parks and Recreation has been delegated the responsibility by the Legislature of the State of California for the administration of a grant to the City of Dublin, setting up necessary procedures governing application(s); and W HEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Parks and Recreation require the grantee’s Governing Body to certify by resolution the approval of project application(s) bef ore submission of said applications to the State; and W HEREAS, the applicant will enter into a contract with the State of California to complete project(s); NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby: 1. Approves the filing of project application(s) for specified grant project(s); and 2. Certifies that said applicant has or will have available, prior to commencement of project work utilizing specified grant funds, sufficient funds, including those provided by this grant, to complete the project; and 3. Certifies that the applicant has or will provide sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project(s), and 4. Certifies that the applicant has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the contract shown in this Procedural Guide; and 5. Delegates the authority to the to the City Manager, or designee (Parks and Community Services Director), to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the grant scope(s); and 6. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August 2019, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 4.17.g Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: 7. Resolution Authorizing Application of Dublin Sports Grounds All-Abilities Specified Grant (Imagine Playground Award) ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ City Clerk 4.17.g Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: 7. Resolution Authorizing Application of Dublin Sports Grounds All-Abilities Specified Grant (Imagine Playground Award) Page 1 of 2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Mayor's Recommendation for Appointments to Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commissions Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider the Mayor’s recommendations for appointments to fill unscheduled vacancies on the Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commissions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm the Mayor’s recommendations of Georgean Vonheeder-Leopold and Sawsan Wolski to the Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission; Shweta Agrawal as an alternate to the Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission; Michael McCorriston as an alternate to the Human Services Commission; or provide other appropriate direction. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A DESCRIPTION: There are unscheduled vacancies on the Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission and Human Services Commission. The vacancies were posted and f ive applications were received for the Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission and three applications were received for the Human Services Commission. Mayor Haubert has reviewed the applications and is recommending the appointments of Georgean Vonheeder -Leopold and Sawsan Wolski to the Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission, with the term expiring in December 2020; Shweta Agrawal as an alternate to the Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission; and Michael McCorriston as an alternate to the Human Services Commission. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A 4.18 Packet Pg. 299 Page 2 of 2 NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications 2. Human Services Commission Applications 4.18 Packet Pg. 300 4.18.a Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission 4.18.a Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) 4.18.a Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: 1. Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) From:noreply@civicplus.com To:Caroline Soto; Walfred Solorzano ; Shari Jackman Subject:Online Form Submittal: Human Services Commission Application Date:Wednesday, July 03, 2019 1:29:20 PM Human Services Commission Application Human Services Commission Application Date (mm/dd/yy):07/03/19 Name:Michael McCorriston Street Address: Phone (work):Field not completed. E-mail: Why are you interested in serving on the Human Services Commission? I have a very strong interest in ensuring that our community continues to make available services for our seniors and for our other citizens who might need services assistance (e.g., medical, transportation, housing and financial guidance). As a community leader and a candidate for the commission, I would view this responsibility as an opportunity to help gap the quality of life challenges of others. We can all relate to the personal situations of our relatives or friends, who could truly use the support and flexibility offered by these services. My personal motivation is aging relatives, who would otherwise have had to rely on the schedules (and conveniences) of family. What knowledge do you have of the human services offered in Dublin and the Tri- Valley? Have you or a family member participated in a local program? My knowledge if the programs offered by Dublin and in the Tri- valley is rudimentary. I have had family members, who live within the Bay Area, who have required both health, transportation, and financial support guidance or support, and I do understand the connective need for the community to lead human services initiatives. What do you think are the major The challenges exist on both the side of the user of these services and gaining community support. These services are a 4.18.b Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: 2. Human Services Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) concerns/challenges of Dublin residents regarding human services programs? Please describe. critical bridge to all of our citizens at certain stages of our lives. With regard to the user, while there may be a general understanding of the existence of these programs, I think many people cannot take advantage due to physical/mental challenges or are hesitant due simply to pride. (We live in a rather affluent community.). With regard to community acceptance, I'm sure that there are "not in my backyard" challenges voiced by citizens. But often times these are misunderstood view points that can be resolved through discussion. Briefly summarize your participation in civic or community activities/groups. My participation to date in civic or community activities has been limited to youth activities (e.g., coaching) and occasional volunteer support. This is primarily due to the time constraints that I have had in the past with family and career. (They are both still there, but much more "manageable" at this point in my life.) To become a member of the HS Commission is a terrific opportunity for me to contribute in a meaningful way in an area that is important to me. How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community that may be unpopular with neighbors, residents or organizations? If I support a program that is unpopular with my neighbors, community or other organizations, I will spend the time to improve the level of communication to ensure that the opposition understands the objectives and importance of the initiative. Of course, we listen to opposing view points and consider compromise. What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Human Services Commission? I have a passion for ensuring that we as citizens are not excluded from utilizing services that help us bridge quality of life gaps. With this in mind, I bring to the committee a strong background in finance that will allow me to evaluate services and proposals for services in a respectful and prudent way. In addition, I believe both my passion and professional experience will be helpful in collaboration efforts with the City Manager and staff. What experience do you have in seeking grants or reviewing grant applications? This would be my first exposure to the public sector. I have 35 years of experience in corporate finance and banking. I manage the treasury operations of a large company in Silicon Valley. I have raised capital for large companies and have negotiated many complex financial structures and opportunities in the private sector. I believe my professional experience is directly applicable and a transferable skill set. I look forward to you allowing me to demonstrate my passion for this opportunity. Application must be submitted by no later than Friday, July 12, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. If you select, "Submit," your application will be sent electronically to the City Clerk's office. If you'd like to retain a copy of your application, please choose 4.18.b Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: 2. Human Services Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) Submit and Print." After you click this button, you will be shown a page with your information provided. Please choose "Print" from your file navigation and then select "Continue." Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. 4.18.b Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: 2. Human Services Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) From:noreply@civicplus.com To:Caroline Soto; Walfred Solorzano ; Shari Jackman Subject:Online Form Submittal: Human Services Commission Application Date:Saturday, June 29, 2019 8:29:41 AM Human Services Commission Application Human Services Commission Application Date (mm/dd/yy):06/30/2019 Name:Suresh Puli Street Address: Phone (work):Field not completed. E-mail: Why are you interested in serving on the Human Services Commission? I would just like to serve my community in any capacity. I am hoping that is good enough reason What knowledge do you have of the human services offered in Dublin and the Tri- Valley? Have you or a family member participated in a local program? I have read about the work the city is doing to address the residents needs. I have no prior knowledge and would like to learn more about this program while I serve my city. What do you think are the major concerns/challenges of Dublin residents regarding human services programs? Please describe. From my view, it looks like there is not enough outreach of these good initiatives to Dublin residents. I guess we could try to do more to educate residents of the programs and efforts of these services. 4.18.b Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: 2. Human Services Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) Briefly summarize your participation in civic or community activities/groups. My interest started with a citizen program that I participated the city of Dublin offered. Ever since I am trying to participate in more areas of civic activities. Hence the reason to apply for this position How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community that may be unpopular with neighbors, residents or organizations? It is not possible to please everybody. Any effort that is done to improve overall the community is a good one from my view. What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Human Services Commission? It is very early for answer this question. I hope to do my best. What experience do you have in seeking grants or reviewing grant applications? I review contracts a lot in my day job. I am sure I can learn given an opportunity Application must be submitted by no later than Friday, July 12, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. If you select, "Submit," your application will be sent electronically to the City Clerk's office. If you'd like to retain a copy of your application, please choose Submit and Print." After you click this button, you will be shown a page with your information provided. Please choose "Print" from your file navigation and then select "Continue." Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. 4.18.b Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: 2. Human Services Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) From:noreply@civicplus.com To:Caroline Soto; Walfred Solorzano ; Shari Jackman Subject:Online Form Submittal: Human Services Commission Application Date:Thursday, June 27, 2019 12:14:56 PM Human Services Commission Application Human Services Commission Application Date (mm/dd/yy):06/27/19 Name:percival villanueva Street Address: Why are you interested in serving on the Human Services Commission? It's a great opportunity to serve the community and my co- worker recommended me to apply since she knows that I may fit the job. What knowledge do you have of the human services offered in Dublin and the Tri- Valley? Have you or a family member participated in a local program? I have no knowledge in human services offered in Dublin and the Tri-Valley that does not limit me to review/recommend action plans from a different point of view. What do you think are the major concerns/challenges of Dublin residents regarding human services programs? Please describe. I have not reviewed what issues/opportunities that our resident in Dublin faces in our city. 4.18.b Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: 2. Human Services Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) Briefly summarize your participation in civic or community activities/groups. I used to volunteer in Pleasanton Police department as a patrol volunteer. How do you feel about making a decision for the overall good of the community that may be unpopular with neighbors, residents or organizations? I will be comfortable to make a decision after I had reviewed all possible scenarios that the decision would affect. This can be done by getting the resident's feedback. What is the most important contribution you can make as a member of the Human Services Commission? To make sure that the residents comes first before anyone's agenda. What experience do you have in seeking grants or reviewing grant applications? None. Application must be submitted by no later than Friday, July 12, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. If you select, "Submit," your application will be sent electronically to the City Clerk's office. If you'd like to retain a copy of your application, please choose Submit and Print." After you click this button, you will be shown a page with your information provided. Please choose "Print" from your file navigation and then select "Continue." Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. 4.18.b Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: 2. Human Services Commission Applications (Heritage & Cultural Arts and Human Services Commission Appointments) Page 1 of 11 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Dublin Boulevard – North Canyons Parkway Extension Project Prepared by: Obaid Khan, Transportation and Operations Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider approving a General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, certifying of the Final Environmental Impact Report, and establishing a Precise Alignment of Dublin Boulevard Right-Of-Way Lines. The City of Dublin, in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation, the City of Livermore, the Alameda County Transportation Commission, and Alameda County, proposes to extend Dublin Boulevard approximately 1 .5 miles eastward through Dublin and unincorporated Alameda County, and connect to North Canyons Parkway in Livermore (Project), from its current terminus at Fallon Road. This roadway extension would provide four to six travel lanes and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and take the following actions: a) Adopt the Resolution Certifying a Final Environmental Impact Report and Adoption of Environmental Findings under CEQA for the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons Parkway Extension Project; b) Adopt the Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan related to the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons Parkway Extension Project; and c) Waive the reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance To Establish Right-Of-Way Lines for Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road and the Eastern City Limit. FINANCIAL IMPACT: As approved in the 2018-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the total estimated cost of the Dublin Boulevard Extension – Fallon Road to North Canyons Parkway is approximately $147.4 million, of which $97.1 million is estimated as the City of Dublin share. Funding for Project costs will be shared between the City of Dublin and the City of Livermore. Through Fiscal Year 2019-2020, City Council has appropriated a CIP budget of approximately $7.6 million from Measure BB Grants, Traffic Impact Fees, and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (SB -1) funds. Project funding also includes 6.1 Packet Pg. 324 Page 2 of 11 $123,000 of funds from the City of Livermor e. Current project funding is for the preliminary engineering, environmental impact report, and initial design. After completion of the preliminary engineering and environmental impact report, Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) will take the lead on project design. There is no impact on the General Fund. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Background The extension of Dublin Boulevard to the Doolan Road/North Canyons Parkway intersection has been planned since 1984. The City of Dublin General Plan (GP), the General Plans of Alameda County and the City of Livermore, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP), the Fallon Village Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Plan Bay Area 2040 all include the extension of Dublin Boulevard. The Dublin Boulevard extension area is north of Interstate 580 (I -580) between the existing terminus of Dublin Boulevard to the west and terminus of North Canyons Parkway to the east (Figure 1). The Project site consists of primarily undeveloped grazing ranchland and open space, with intermittent agricultural structures and outbuildings. Improvements to the agricultural lands generally consist of private paved and unpaved roads used to access private property, fences, barns, corrals, wells, water tanks, and various outbuildings. There are developed residential areas north of the site and a commercial landscaping business south of the proposed roadway extension within the City of Dublin. FIGURE 1 The topography of the project site ranges from relatively flat at the southern portion near I-580 to gently rolling hills to the north. The topography slopes up slightly northward, 6.1 Packet Pg. 325 Page 3 of 11 and Cottonwood Creek (located in unincorporated Alameda County) flows from north to southwest across a portion of the Project site. There are a small number of trees within the Project site, some which are planted around existing agricultural development and growing near man-made drainages. Several patches of ornamental trees, primarily eucalyptus, occur near fence lines and buildings. There are also riparian trees along Cottonwood Creek. Tree species include willows and valley oaks. Valley oaks in the Project site along Cottonwood Creek are large, up to 4.8 feet diameter-at-breast-height. GP and EDSP Land Use Designations adjacent to the Dublin Boulevard extension include General Commercial, General Commercial/Campus Office, Industrial Park, and Open Space, as well as resource management and large parcel agricultural uses in the County (Figure 2). FIGURE 2 On May 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and adopted Resolution 19-03 (Attachment 1) recommending that the City Council certify an Environmental Impact Report and adopt required environmental findings for the Dublin Boulevard – North Canyons Parkway Extension Project. At the same meeting, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 19-04 (Attachment 2) recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution amending the GP and EDSP related to the Dublin Boulevard- North Canyons Parkway Project. Planning Commission meeting minutes a re included as Attachment 3. 6.1 Packet Pg. 326 Page 4 of 11 As recommended by the Planning Commission, the City Council is requested to review and approve a GP amendment, EDSP Plan amendment, certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report, and introduce an ordinance to establish a Precise Alignment for Dublin Boulevard Right-Of-Way lines. Alameda County will address necessary entitlements and right-of-way alignment for the segment of the proposed roadway located within unincorporated Alameda County that connects to the city limits with Livermore. Proposed Project The City of Dublin, in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation, City of Livermore, Alameda County Transportation Commission, and Alameda County, propose to extend Dublin Boulevard from its current terminus at Fallon Road, approximately 1.5 miles eastward through unincorporated Alameda County, terminating at the boundary between the County and the City of Livermore at the Doolan Road/North Canyons Parkway intersection as shown in Figure 1. This road way extension would provide four to six travel lanes and bicycle and pedestrian facilities (i.e., pathways, sidewalks and bike lanes). The permanent area required for the Project, including the roadway, sidewalks, intersections, and land acquired for right -of-way is estimated at 29 acres. Future average daily traffic (ADT) along the roadway extension is projected to be 17,000 to 19,000 vehicles per day. Local and Regional Transportation Network Local and regional planning efforts have identified several transportation goals, which the Project directly and indirectly helps to achieve. The transportation goals are: • Increase bicycle and pedestrian access and circulation • Interconnect five Priority Development Areas (PDAs) in Dublin and Livermore • Improve overall mobility, access, connectivity, safety, and efficiency of the multimodal transportation system for all users, including goods movement • Provide approaches and technologies that enhance the existing roadway system’s efficiency and capacity without widening streets • Reduce single-occupancy vehicle trips by providing a transit system along the roadway extension with improved headways during peak periods. The Project provides a needed connection to undeveloped areas within the EDSP area east of Fallon Road and adjacent to the I-580 frontage. The proposed roadway extension also closes a gap in the existing local roadway network connecting Dublin and Livermore. Similarly, the roadway extension provides direct access from PDAs in Livermore (Isabel Avenue/Bay Area Rapid Transit Station) and Dublin (Town Center and Transit Center PDAs) to existing and planned employment and commercial areas in Dublin. Currently, trips between Dublin and Livermore are completed using I -580. The use of I- 580 for local trips adds to congestion on the regional transportation network and indirectly generates additional air pollutants from traffic congestion due to idling vehicles. Additionally, use of I-580 for local trips may result in a longer trip length, 6.1 Packet Pg. 327 Page 5 of 11 requiring motorists to go out of their way to reach their destination. The Project allows local users to shorten their trip distance by using local streets as well as reduce trips on I-580 by providing an alternate route for local travel. The Project includes pedestrian and bicycle facilities such as sidewalks, multi-use pathways, bike lanes, and/or bikeways. The Project also allows for the future extension of bus service, as described in the EDSP, and connects future development areas to regional fixed rail transit (BART). New transit, bicycle, and pedestrian connectivity provides local travelers an alternative to personal motorized vehicles. Design Features Project design features and components include (from west to east): 1. Intersection improvements at Fallon Road (including modification of the signalized intersection); 2. Elimination of the existing intersection of Croak Road and Fallon Road; 3. Abandonment of a north-south (frontage road) portion of Croak Road adjacent and parallel to Fallon Road; 4. The addition of a “T” shaped hammerhead turnaround at the new terminus of Croak Road adjacent to Fallon Road; 5. Grading and earthwork northeast of the Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road intersection, including grading at the base of the hills to the north, and more minor grading throughout the road alignment to meet engineering and safety requirements; 6. Removal of overhead utility lines between Fallon Road and Croak Road; 7. Creation of a new signalized intersection where the Dublin Boulevard extension would cross Croak Road; 8. Construction of a new bridge over Cottonwood Creek in Alameda County; 9. Construction staging and laydown between the extension and Collier Canyon Road, along Doolan Road; 10. Intersection improvements at the Doolan Road/North Canyons parkway intersection, including the creation of a new, signalized eastbound approach to the intersection; 11. The extension of underground utility lines within the Project site; 12. Construction of the new roadway, which includes a median, inside shoulder at some locations, vehicle travel lanes, bicycle facilities , a parkway strip, separated sidewalks and separated Class I bike path and/or a multi-use path, street lighting, and cut/fill embankments; and 13. Retaining walls which may be used in addition to, or as an alternative to, cut/fill embankments associated with roadway grading. If used, retaining walls would be placed outside of the sidewalk and bicycle areas on either side of the roadway cross section, within the construction footprint and within the permanent right-of-way. Retaining walls would measure 3 feet to 10 feet in height and would generally require a smaller area of grading or ground disturbance in comparison to cut/fill slopes. 6.1 Packet Pg. 328 Page 6 of 11 Proposed Precise Alignment Chapter 7.68 – Establishing Right-of-Way Lines of the Dublin Municipal Code (the “Code”) allows for establishment of right-of-way lines for purposes of future roadway extension, widening, or creation of space for future utilities, pedestrian pathways, fire and police emergency access to property, and all public rights -of-way. The Code requires the Planning Commission hold at least one (1) public hearing on any proposed establishment of right-of-way lines. Upon completion of the hearing, the Planning Commission is required to submit its report and recommendation to the City Council. On June 25, 2019, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and adopted Resolution 19-05 (Attachment 4), recommending that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention to establish precise alignment for the future Right -Of-Way Lines for Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road and the eastern City of Dublin limit. ANALYSIS: General Plan / Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments The project is proposing no changes to the land use designations in the General Plan (GP) and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP). T he only proposed change to the GP and EDSP is to modify the planned number of lanes along the proposed Dublin Boulevard extension within the City of Dublin. Currently, the GP and EDSP anticipate a six-lane roadway from Fallon Road to the eastern City Limit. Based on a detailed traffic study prepared as part of the Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR), staff recommends changing the planned number of lanes to a four- to six-lane roadway as defined below: Beginning at Fallon Road, the roadway extension would have six travel lanes (three in each direction). Continuing eastward, the roadway extension would transition to four travel lanes (two in each direction) before or at the intersection with Croak Road. From Croak Road to Doolan Road/North Canyons Parkway intersection, the roadway extension would remain in the four-lane configuration. In addition to this change Staff has recommended some minor amendments to address outdated text in EDSP Chapters 5 and 7, as indicated in the proposed resolution to amend the GP and EDSP (Attachment 5). Establish Precise Alignment The establishment of Right-Of-Way Lines are intended to reserve sufficient right-of-way for future road construction. Adoption of an ordinance to establish the Right -Of-Way Lines will not result in the immediate acquisition of any property but will preclude property owners from constructing structures within the right-of-way area. The Dublin Municipal Code (the “Code”) requires that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention to establish right-of-way lines. The City Council adopted Resolution of Intention 75-19 on July 16, 2019 (Attachment 6). The Resolution of Intention set a public hearing date of August 20, 2019. At the public hearing, the City 6.1 Packet Pg. 329 Page 7 of 11 Council heard the public testimony, reviewed the proposed right-of-way lines, and then considered establishing the right-of-way lines by ordinance. The proposed ordinance to establish the Right-Of-Lines is attached as Attachment 7. The legal descriptions and plats (Exhibit A to Attachment 7) for the proposed Right-Of-Way Lines show the right-of- way that will be required from a total of seven (7) properties. Out of these seven (7) properties, five (5) properties are inside Dublin city limits (Table 1). The other two properties are in unincorporated Alameda County. TABLE 1. – Parcels with Dublin Blvd Extension Right-of-Way Assessor’s Parcel Number Jurisdiction Right-of-Way Acquisition in square feet (sf) 985-0027-002 Dublin 470,000 sf 905-0001-006-03 Dublin 125,000 sf 905-0001-005-02 Dublin 100,000 sf 905-0001-004-04 Dublin 90,000 sf 905-0001-004-03 Dublin 20,000 sf 905-0001-003-02 County 160,000 sf 905-0001-001-02 County 250,000 sf In accordance with State Planning and Zoning Law, a Planning local agency (Planning Commission) must report on the conformity to the GP as to the location, purpose and intent of the future right-of-way prior to the establishment of said right-of way lines. Additionally, prior to creation of the right -of-way lines an environmental analysis as per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) must also be completed for the proposed Right-Of-Way alignment. The consistency with the GP and EDSP; and the environmental analysis for the establishment of the Right -Of-Way Lines is described in the following sections. CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, SPECIFIC PLANS, AND ZONING ORDINANCE: The Project is consistent with the General Plan (GP) and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP), as amended. The GP recommends maintaining Level of Service D (LOS) at signalized intersections. The proposed lane configuration has been analyzed in the DEIR under the Transportation and Traffic Analysis Chapter and was found to maintain LOS D at project intersections consistent with the GP policies. The preliminary design of the Project is also consistent with the GP and EDSP in terms of the Project design features such as sidewalks, vehicle travel lanes, and medians. The Project is also consistent with the City of Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan in that it helps implement the planned bicycle and pedestrian facility improvements envisioned in within the Master Plan and helps to facilitate future bicycle and pedestrian travel. The proposed Right-Of-Way lines for the Project are also consistent with the GP and the EDSP, as amended. Land use designations and density of development surrounding the proposed Dublin Boulevard alignment are not modified through the proposed creation of the Right-Of-Lines. The existing land uses in GP and EDSP will remain as they currently exist and are shown in Figure 2. The proposed roadway extension abuts or crosses Open Space, General Commercial, General Commercial/Campus Office, and Industrial Park land uses. 6.1 Packet Pg. 330 Page 8 of 11 REVIEW BY APPLICABLE DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES: The Community Development Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, Public Works Department, and Dublin San Ramon Services District reviewed the project and provided comments where appropriate to ensure that the Project is established in compliance with all local Ordinances and Regulations. All their comments have been addressed in the proposed Project preliminary design. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Upon preliminary review of the Project and with the determination that an EIR would be required, Staff published a Notice of Preparation (NOP) on May 18, 2017, to inform the public and responsible agencies that a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) was being prepared. The NOP was circulated for a 30-day comment period that concluded on June 19, 2017. A scoping meeting was conducted at Dublin City Hall on May 31, 2017, to inform the public and interested agencies of the Project, solicit comments, and identify areas of concern. The Project Draft EIR was circulated for a 45-day public review period from March 6, 2019 to April 22, 2019, consistent with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations. Copies of the document were distributed to federal, State, regional, and local agencies, as well as organizations and individuals, for their review and comment. The Draft EIR was also made available to the public at City Hall, the Library, and on the City of Dublin Website. The scope of the Draft EIR included the potential environmental impacts identified in the NOP and issues raised by agencies and the public in response to the NOP, which include: • Aesthetics • Hydrology and Water Quality • Air Quality • Land Use and Planning • Biological Resources • Noise and Vibration • Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources • Population and Housing • Geology and Soils • Public Services • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Transportation and Traffic • Utilities and Services Systems The Project would result in significant unavoidable impacts related to traffic. Table 1 -2 of the Draft EIR summarizes all environmental impacts that would result from the Project and the level of significance after mitigation. Except for traffic impacts, all other impacts will be mitigated through the proposed mitigation measures to the less than significant level. Some traffic impacts resulting from the Project have been determined to be significant and unavoidable because mitigation to reduce these impacts would require physical changes to intersections and signal timing changes in areas outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction. Dublin and Livermore are continuing to work together to identify the funding and timing for mitigation to reduce these significant impacts. All other environmental impacts would be less than significant or less than significant with mitigation. An overview of all the topic areas is provided below: 6.1 Packet Pg. 331 Page 9 of 11 Aesthetics To address potential aesthetic impacts associated with the project, simulations from two viewpoints were prepared and compared to existing conditions. The EIR identified potential impacts related to the degradation of 1) the scenic quality of the hills to the north and 2) the visual quality and views of the Project vicinity as a result of Project grading, retaining walls, and the addition of trees and landscaping. The EIR identifies mitigation measures to reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level. Additionally, the EIR identifies potential, temporary nighttime light and glare impacts as a result of construction equipment lighting. The EIR identifies a mitigation measure to reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. With mitigation, all aesthetic impacts would be less than significant. Air Quality The EIR identifies potentially significant impacts to air quality and includes mitigation measures. Construction-period fugitive dust impacts would be reduced to a less -than- significant level with mitigation. Additionally, as a precautionary measure, all off -road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet United States Environmental Protection Agency Tier 4 interim off -road emissions standards to the extent feasible. With mitigation, all air quality impacts would be less than significant. Biological Resources The EIR identifies biological resources such as wetlands, habitat, and special status species (e.g. Congdon Tarplant, California red-legged frog, California tiger salamander, etc.) that would be directly and indirectly impacted by the Project. Mitigation measures are identified to reduce all biological resource impacts to a less-than-significant level. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources The Project site is not listed as a historic site and does not contain known archeological or tribal cultural resources. Nonetheless, there is always the possibility that buried resources exist within the Project site. As such, the EIR identifies mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts related to cultural and tribal cultural resources to a less- than-significant level. Geology and Soils The EIR identifies potential geology and soils impacts associated with the exposure of people and structures to risks associated with slope stability, liquefact ion, and seismically-induced settlement at or near Project site; soil erosion or loss of topsoil during construction; and risks associated with corrosive, expansive, or other unsuitable soils. The EIR identifies mitigation to reduce these risks to a less-than-significant level. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The EIR identifies potential impacts associated with soil contamination from past uses of the Project site and surrounding areas, which could expose construction workers and future users to contaminants. Additionally, Project construction could require transportation of contaminated soils within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, if contaminated soils are found and removed from the construction footprint. The EIR identifies mitigation which would reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level. 6.1 Packet Pg. 332 Page 10 of 11 Hydrology and Water Quality The EIR did not identify any potentially significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality. Therefore, no mitigation measures were identified, and no ne are required. Preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required for the Project. Land Use and Planning The EIR did not identify any potentially significant impacts related to land use and planning. Therefore, no mitigation measures were identified, and none are required. Noise and Vibration The EIR identifies potential construction noise impacts and includes mitigation to reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level. Population and Housing The EIR did not identify any potentially significant impacts related to population and housing. Therefore, no mitigation measures were identified, and none are required. Public Services The EIR identifies potential construction-period impacts related to interference with emergency services access as a result of construction work at the intersections of Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road and Doolan Road/North Canyons Parkway. Mitigation is identified to reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. Transportation and Traffic The Project would result in significant unavoidable impacts related to traffic, specifically LOS/intersection congestion, at two locations: Airway Boulevard/North Canyons Parkway and Isabel Avenue/I-580 Westbound off-ramps. These traffic impacts have been determined to be significant and unavoidable because while feasible mitigation measures have been identified in the EIR, mitigation to reduce these impacts would require physical changes to intersections and signal timing changes in areas outs ide of Dublin’s jurisdiction. Dublin and Livermore are continuing to work together to identify the funding and timing for mitigation to reduce these significant impacts. All other transportation and traffic impacts would be less than significant or less th an significant with mitigation. Utilities and Service Systems The EIR did not identify any potentially significant impacts related to utilities and service systems. Therefore, no mitigation measures were identified, and none are required. CONCLUSION The City received ten letters and emails during the public review period. Responses have been prepared to each of the comments received by the City. The comments and associated responses constitute the Project Final EIR (Attachment 11). The Planning Commission adopted Resolution 19-03 (Attachment 1) on May 28, 2019, recommending to the City Council Certification of the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons Parkway Extension Project Final EIR (Attachment 11). The Draft EIR (Attachment 10) 6.1 Packet Pg. 333 Page 11 of 11 and the Final EIR (Attachment 11) has fully analyzed the proposed Project including its footprint and the proposed permanent Right -Of-Way Lines for Dublin Boulevard extension. In order to approve the project, the City Council will need to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) that identifies all environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level and explain why the benefits of the project outweigh its unavoidable environmental impacts. The SOC is included as Attachment 14 for the City Council’s consideration. The City Council resolution certifying the Final EIR and making all environmental findings required under CEQA for the Project approval is included as Attachment 9. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: A public notice was mailed to adjacent property owners of the Project area. Public agencies and interested parties were also notified. The public notice was published in the East Bay Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. The Project was also included on the City’s transportation projects webpage. As required by the Dublin Municipal Code, Chapter 7.68, the Resolution of Intention to establish Right-Of Way Lines for the Project was published and posted along the proposed precise alignment to give notice to th e interested parties of the proposed Right-Of-Way ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution 19-03 2. Planning Commission Resolution 19-04 3. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 28, 2019 4. Planning Commission Resolution 19-05 5. Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Related to the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons Parkway Extension Project 6. Resolution 75 -19 7. Ordinance to Establish Right-Of-Way Lines for Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road and the Eastern City Limit 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance 9. Resolution Certifying an Environmental Impact Report and Adopting Environmental Findings under CEQA for the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons Parkway Extension Project 10. Exhibit A to Attachment 9 11. Exhibit B to Attachment 9 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 13. Exhibit D to Attachment 9 14. Exhibit E to Attachment 9 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 6.1 Packet Pg. 334 6.1.a Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: 1. Planning Commission Resolution 19-03 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6.1.a Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: 1. Planning Commission Resolution 19-03 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6.1.a Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: 1. Planning Commission Resolution 19-03 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6.1.a Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: 1. Planning Commission Resolution 19-03 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6.1.b Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: 2. Planning Commission Resolution 19-04 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6.1.b Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: 2. Planning Commission Resolution 19-04 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6.1.c Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: 3. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 28, 2019 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6.1.c Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: 3. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - May 28, 2019 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6.1.d Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: 4. Planning Commission Resolution 19-05 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6.1.d Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: 4. Planning Commission Resolution 19-05 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1 RESOLUTION NO. xx-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN _____________________________________________________ AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN RELATED TO THE DUBLIN BOULEVARD – NORTH CANYONS PARKWAY EXTENSION PROJECT (APNS 985-0027-002, 905-0001-006-03, 905-0001-005-02, 905-0001-004-04, 905-0001-004- 03, 905-0001-003-02, AND 905-0001-001-02) WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (Dublin), in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), City of Livermore (Livermore), Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) and Alameda County (County), proposes to extend Dublin Boulevard from its current terminus at Fallon Road, approximately 1.5 miles eastward through unincorporated Alameda County, and connect to North Canyons Parkway at the boundary between the County and Livermore city limits. Requested approvals include a General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, and certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report, among other related actions. These planning and implementing actions are collectively known as the “Dublin Blvd Extension Project” or the “Project”; and WHEREAS, the Project footprint is within the City of Dublin and is approximately 18.5 acres generally bounded by the eastern Dublin jurisdictional limit, Fallon Road, I -580, and Central Parkway (APNs 985-0027-002, 905-0001-006-03, 905-0001-005-02, 905-0001-004- 03, 905-0001-004-04). The remainder of the Project footprint is 10.5 acres and is located inside Alameda County and the City of Livermore (APNs 905-0001-003-02, and 905-0001-001-02); and WHEREAS, the existing General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan designate six lanes along Dublin Boulevard within Dublin jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin proposes to reduce the designated number of lanes for Dublin Boulevard from six lanes to f our lanes from Croak Road to the Dublin jurisdictional limit, while maintaining six lanes designation for the remainder of the street between Fallon Road and Croak Road; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, the City prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Project which reflected the City’s independent judgment and analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Project; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was circulated for 45 days for public comment from March 6, 2019 to April 22, 2019; and 6.1.e Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: 5. Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Related to the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons 2 WHEREAS, comments received on the Draft EIR were reviewed and responded to, and the Final EIR (that contains the Response to Comments) dated May 2019 was prepared; and WHEREAS, consistent with section 65352.3 of the California Government Code, the City obtained a contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage Commission and notified the tribes on the contact list of the opportunity to consult with the City on the proposed General Plan Amendment. None of the contacted tribes requeste d a consultation within the 90-day statutory consultation period and no further action is required under section 65352.3; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2019, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 19 -04 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan amendments and the entirety of the Project, which resolution is incorporated herein by reference and available for review at City Hall during normal business hours; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated August 20, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project, including the General Plan Amendments, and certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report, for the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the Project, including the proposed General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan amendments, on August 20, 2019, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard ; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution xx-19 certifying the Project EIR and adopting CEQA findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Final EIR and all above-referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan amendments, as set forth below, are in the public interest, will promote general health, safety and welfare, and that the General Plan as amended will remain internally consistent. The proposed project is consistent with the guiding and implementing policies of the General Plan in each of the Elements and will allow for the continued implementation of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The General Plan amendments noted below will ensure that the implementation of the proposed project is in compliance with the General Plan and that each Element within the General Plan is internally consistent. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the following amendments to the General Plan: 6.1.e Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: 5. Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Related to the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons 3 Table 5-1 shall be amended to read as follows: ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION Fallon Road Widening Widening of Fallon Road to six lanes from Positano Parkway to Dublin Boulevard. Tassajara Road Widening Widening of Tassajara Road to six lanes between Fallon Road to Dublin Boulevard. Tassajara Road Widening Widening of Tassajara Road to eight lanes between Dublin Boulevard and 1-580 westbound ramps. Dublin Blvd Widening Widening of Dublin Boulevard to six lanes from Brannigan Street to Fallon Road. Dublin Blvd Extension Dublin Boulevard six lane extension, from Fallon Road to Croak Road. Dublin Blvd Extension Dublin Boulevard four lane extension, from Croak Road to North Canyons Parkway Arnold Road Widening Widening Arnold Road to four lanes from Dublin Blvd to Central Parkway. Hacienda Drive Widening Widening Hacienda Drive to six lanes from Dublin Boulevard to Central Parkway. Hacienda Drive Widening Widening Hacienda Drive to four lanes from Central Parkway to Gleason Road. Scarlett Court Extension Extend/Widen Scarlett Drive to four lanes from Dublin Boulevard to Dougherty Road. Grafton Street Completion Completion of Grafton Street between Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard. Fallon Road Widening Widening of Fallon Road to four lanes from Tassajara Road to Silvera Ranch Drive. Central Pkwy Extension Central Parkway two lane extension, from Fallon Road to Croak Road. Dougherty Road Widening Widening Dougherty Road to six lanes from Sierra Court to City limits. St. Patrick Way Extend St. Patrick Way from Regional Street to connect to its current terminus west of Golden Gate Drive. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the following amendments to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan: Section 5.1.1 – DUBLIN BOULEVARD shall be amended to read as follows: Dublin Boulevard is a major east -west arterial in the City of Dublin. Dublin Boulevard is extended to Fallon Road. Dublin Boulevard is a six -lane facility from San Ramon Road to Tassajara Road and from Tassajara Road to Fallon Road it is currently a five to six lane facility. Section 5.1.2 PLANNED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, second paragraph, shall be amended to read as follows: 6.1.e Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: 5. Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Related to the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons 4 The City of Dublin has completed an extension of Dublin Boulevard east of Dougherty Road to Fallon Road. This extension provides three lanes in each direction, except for a short segment between Tassajara Road and Brannigan Street. The Dublin General Plan also designates a future four -lane Scarlett Drive parallel to Iron Horse Trail, connecting Dougherty Road north of Dublin Boulevard with the Dublin Boulevard east of Dougherty Road. Section 5.2.3 EAST-WEST CIRCULATION, second Paragraph, shall be amended to read as follows: The southernmost corridor, located approximately a quarter of a mile north of the freeway, is Dublin Boulevard, providing the principal vehicular connection between eastern Dublin and the wester n Dublin community. Dublin Boulevard is also a major transit route which connects residential and employment users along Dublin Boulevard to BART. Projected to ultimately be a four -lane to six- lane roadway, Dublin Boulevard would ultimately connect with N orth Canyons Parkway in Livermore to provide a reliever route paralleling the freeway. The segment between Croak Road and North Canyons Parkway will be a four -lane roadway. The minimum right-of-way shall be 136 feet. Dublin Boulevard right -of-way shall be widened to 154 feet minimum from Tassajara Creek to the Iron Horse Trail to accommodate a bicycle trail along the north side of the street. Section 5.2.7 ARTERIAL STREETS shall be amended to read as follows: The arterial streets in East Dublin are designed to carry higher traffic volumes with a minimum of interference from connecting traffic. The major arterial streets include Dublin Boulevard, as well as Hacienda Drive, Tassajara Road and Fallon Road. In general, these streets will provide six thro ugh lanes, with up to eight through lanes for short street sections connecting directly to a freeway interchange. Dublin Boulevard between Croak Road and North Canyons Parkway in Livermore will be a four-lane roadway. Access to arterials will be permitted only at signalized intersections with arterial or collector streets, or at selected controlled locations with the approval of the Director of Public Works. Section 7.5.2 STREETS shall be amended to read as follows: DUBLIN BOULEVARD • Four to Six lane arterial street • No on-street parking. • 16' Landscaped median. • 20 'from curbline to ROW line includes 2 large canopy trees and 8' sidewalk or pedestrian/bike path. • 10' landscaped setback outside ROW. 6.1.e Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: 5. Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Related to the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons 5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of August, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ City Clerk 6.1.e Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: 5. Resolution Amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Related to the Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons RESOLUTION NO. 75 — 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ESTABLISH PRECISE ALIGNMENT FOR THE FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY LINES FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN FALLON ROAD AND THE EASTERN CITY LIMIT WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has proposed the establishment of Right-Of-Way lines for Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road and the Eastern City Limit (Project) in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 7.68; and WHEREAS, the Project has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 19-04 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Boulevard — North Canyons Parkway Extension Project; and WHEREAS, a report and recommendation were prepared on behalf of the Public Works Director and submitted to the Planning Commission, as required by Municipal Code Chapter 7.68, recommending that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council adoption of a Resolution of Intention to establish Right-Of-Way lines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after hearing and considering all said reports, recommendations and testimony at a public hearing on June 25, 2019, adopted Resolution 19-05, recommending that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to establish Right-Of-Way lines for Dublin Boulevard as proposed between Fallon Road and the eastern City Limit; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts this Resolution of Intention and calls for a public hearing pursuant to Sections 7.68.080 through 7.68.100 of the Dublin Municipal Code, at 7:00 p.m. on August 20,2019, in the City of Dublin City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, to hear protests and objections to the establishment of the proposed Right-Of-Way lines as depicted on the legal descriptions attached hereto as Exhibit A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is directed to post this Resolution of Intention in accordance with Section 7.68.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code at least 10 days before the public hearing. Reso 75-19, Adopted 7/16/2019, Item 4.6 Page 1 of 2 6.1.f Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Goel, Hernandez, Josey, Kumagai, and Mayor Haubert NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OPYI or ATTEST: 24 , City Clerk Reso 75-19, Adopted 7/16/2019, Item 4.6 Page 2 of 2 6.1.f Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 4670 Willow Road Suite 250 Pleasanton California 94588 phone 925.396.7700 fax 925.396.7799 www.bkf.com May 30, 2019 BKF Job No: 20167083 Page 1 of 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION Real property situate in the partially in the City of Dublin and partially in the unincorporated area of the County Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Being a portion of the lands described in that certain Grad Deed to GH PacVest, LLC, filed on June 15, 2017 as Document No. 2017130933, a portion of the lands described in that certain Grant Deed to GH PacVest, LLC, filed on February 24, 2017 as Document No. 2017049324, a portion of the lands described in that certain Grant Deed to Righetti Partners, LP, filed on March 12, 1992 as Document No. 92075343, a portion of the lands described in that certain Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale to Town and Country H Fund, LLC, filed on January 6, 2011 as Document No. 2011006014, a portion of the lands described in that certain Grant Deed to Robert D. Branaugh, filed on December 29, 2010 as Document No. 2010391422, and a portion of the lands described in that certain Quitclaim Deed to the Sullivan/Crosby Trust, filed on January 23, 2006 as Document No. 2006024088 which is also described in that certain Grant Deed to Livbor-Manning LLC, filed on April 9, 2014 in Document No. 2014087294, all of Official Records of Alameda County, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a City of Dublin standard monument at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard, said monument lying at the northerly terminus of the monument line described as North 0°26’33” East, 1,150.00 feet on that certain Parcel Map 8734, filed on November 22, 2006 in Book 294 of Parcel Maps at Pages 19 and 20, in the Office of the County Recorder of Alameda County; Thence from said city monument South 57°41’21” East, 47.28 feet to the beginning of an Engineer’s Station Line, Station 100+00.00 for the proposed Dublin Boulevard extension; Thence along said Engineer’s Station Line South 89°29’34” East, 93.86 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 1,850.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve through a central angle of 0°46’20”, an arc length of 24.93 feet to the intersection with the easterly line of Fallon Road, said point being at Engineer’s Station 101+18.79, being also the POINT OF BEGNNING of this description; Thence along said easterly line North 2°06'44" East, 110.25 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave South, having a radius of 1,967.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears South 2°12'08" West; Thence leaving said easterly line along said curve, through a central angle of 7°39'15", an arc length of 262.77 feet to the beginning of a compound curve, having a radius of 250.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears South 9°51'22" West; Thence Easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 9°30'46", an arc length of 41.51 feet; Thence South 70°37'52" East, 41.62 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 375.00 feet; 6.1.f Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 4670 Willow Road Suite 250 Pleasanton California 94588 phone 925.396.7700 fax 925.396.7799 www.bkf.com May 30, 2019 BKF Job No: 20167083 Page 2 of 4 Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 5°57'45", an arc length of 39.02 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 1,956.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears South 13°24'23" West; Thence southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 27°03'19", an arc length of 923.63 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 1,918.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears North 40°27'42" East; Thence easterly along said curve lying parallel and 82.00 feet northerly of said Engineer’s Station Line, through a central angle of 40°26'03", an arc length of 1,353.55 feet; Thence South 89°58'21" East, 17.34 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 100.00 feet northerly of said Engineer’s Station Line North 62°23'31" East, 38.81 feet; Thence South 89°58'21" East, 69.84 feet; Thence South 61°48'50" East, 36.02 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 83.00 feet northerly of said Engineer’s Station Line South 89°58'21" East, 238.02 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 275.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 9°13'48", an arc length of 44.30 feet; Thence South 80°44'33" East, 40.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 225.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 9°13'48", an arc length of 36.25 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 70.00 feet northerly of said Engineer’s Station Line South 89°58'21" East, 2,040.71 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 3,070.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 24°23'10", an arc length of 1,306.65 feet; Thence South 65°35'11" East, 360.90 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 2,230.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 23°54'30", an arc length of 930.53 feet; Thence South 89°29'40" East, 259.51 feet; Thence North 58°07'26" East, 34.80 feet to the westerly line of Doolan Road; 6.1.f Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 4670 Willow Road Suite 250 Pleasanton California 94588 phone 925.396.7700 fax 925.396.7799 www.bkf.com May 30, 2019 BKF Job No: 20167083 Page 3 of 4 Thence along said westerly line South 0°25'40" West, 88.64 feet to the intersection with said Engineer’s Station Line at Station 182+15.06, said point being also North 75°43’58” West, 25.75 feet of a City of Livermore monument at the intersection of Doolan Road and N. Canyon Parkway as shown on that certain Parcel Map 7640, filed on June 13, 2001 in Book 256 of Maps at Pages 81 through 84, inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of Alameda County; Thence leaving said point, and continuing along said line South 0°25'40" West, 87.61 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line North 47°57'11" West, 41.63 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 60.00 feet southerly of said Engineer’s Station Line North 89°29'40" West, 257.98 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 2,360.00 feet; Thence westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 23°54'30", an arc length of 984.78 feet; Thence North 65°35'11" West, 360.90 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 2,940.00 feet; Thence westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 24°23'10", an arc length of 1,251.32 feet; Thence North 89°58'21" West, 2,400.18 feet; Thence South 48°02'19" West, 41.66 feet; Thence South 0°21'44" West, 12.13 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 100.00 feet southerly of said Engineer’s Station Line North 89°58'21" West, 74.10 feet; Thence North 53°39'17" West, 47.28 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 72.00 feet southerly of said Engineer’s Station Line North 89°58'21" West, 8.99 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 2,072.00 feet; Thence westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 39°57'41", an arc length of 1,445.13 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 1,778.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears South 39°59'20" West; Thence westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 38°07'45", an arc length of 1,183.23 feet; Thence South 49°17'04" West, 39.49 feet to the easterly line of Fallon Road; Thence along said easterly line North 2°06'44" East, 106.39 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 26.365 acres, more or less. 6.1.f Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 4670 Willow Road Suite 250 Pleasanton California 94588 phone 925.396.7700 fax 925.396.7799 www.bkf.com May 30, 2019 BKF Job No: 20167083 Page 4 of 4 END OF DESCRIPTION As shown on plat attached hereto and by this reference made part hereof as Exhibit B. For: BKF Engineers Davis Thresh, P.L.S. No. 6868 5/30/2019 Dated 6.1.f Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) FALLONROADDOOLANROADI- 580CROAK ROAD2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 S YE VR U RONAEDL CEN SLID AINROFIACFO E TT 6.1.f Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) FALLON ROAD DUBLIN BLVD1"= 6.1.f Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.f Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.f Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) CROAK ROAD 1"=100' 6.1.f Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.f Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.f Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.f Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.f Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.f Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) DOOLAN ROAD N. CANYONS 6.1.f Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: 6. Resolution 75 -19 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) ORDINANCE NO. XX-19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TO ESTABLISH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN FALLON ROAD AND THE EASTERN CITY LIMIT WHEREAS, the City Council Adopted Resolution No. 75-19 on July 16, 2019, calling for a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Sections 7.68.080 through 7.68.100 of the Dublin Municipal Code on August 20, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California, to hear protests and objections to the establishment of right -of- way lines for Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road and the Eastern City Limit; and WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was duly given; and WHEREAS, no written objections were received by the City Clerk prior to the public hearing on August 20, 2019; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.68, the ultimate right-of-way lines are hereby established for Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road and the Eastern City Limit, according to the Legal Descriptions, attached hereto as Exhibit A, said Exhibit herein incorporated . SECTION 2: Section 7.68.150 (Previously established right-of-way lines) shall be amended to include: Dublin Boulevard from Fallon Road to the Eastern City Limit. SECTION 3: The effect of said right-of-way lines shall be governed by the provisions of Dublin Ordinance No. 44-87, as amended. SECTION 4: Effective Date and Posting of Ordinance This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption by the City Council. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. 6.1.g Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: 7. Ordinance to Establish Right-Of-Way Lines for Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road and the Eastern City Limit (Amend GP PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin on this 3rd day of September 2019, by the following votes: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Clerk 6.1.g Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: 7. Ordinance to Establish Right-Of-Way Lines for Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road and the Eastern City Limit (Amend GP 4670 Willow Road Suite 250 Pleasanton California 94588 phone 925.396.7700 fax 925.396.7799 www.bkf.com May 30, 2019 BKF Job No: 20167083 Page 1 of 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION Real property situate in the partially in the City of Dublin and partially in the unincorporated area of the County Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Being a portion of the lands described in that certain Grad Deed to GH PacVest, LLC, filed on June 15, 2017 as Document No. 2017130933, a portion of the lands described in that certain Grant Deed to GH PacVest, LLC, filed on February 24, 2017 as Document No. 2017049324, a portion of the lands described in that certain Grant Deed to Righetti Partners, LP, filed on March 12, 1992 as Document No. 92075343, a portion of the lands described in that certain Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale to Town and Country H Fund, LLC, filed on January 6, 2011 as Document No. 2011006014, a portion of the lands described in that certain Grant Deed to Robert D. Branaugh, filed on December 29, 2010 as Document No. 2010391422, and a portion of the lands described in that certain Quitclaim Deed to the Sullivan/Crosby Trust, filed on January 23, 2006 as Document No. 2006024088 which is also described in that certain Grant Deed to Livbor-Manning LLC, filed on April 9, 2014 in Document No. 2014087294, all of Official Records of Alameda County, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at a City of Dublin standard monument at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard, said monument lying at the northerly terminus of the monument line described as North 0°26’33” East, 1,150.00 feet on that certain Parcel Map 8734, filed on November 22, 2006 in Book 294 of Parcel Maps at Pages 19 and 20, in the Office of the County Recorder of Alameda County; Thence from said city monument South 57°41’21” East, 47.28 feet to the beginning of an Engineer’s Station Line, Station 100+00.00 for the proposed Dublin Boulevard extension; Thence along said Engineer’s Station Line South 89°29’34” East, 93.86 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 1,850.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve through a central angle of 0°46’20”, an arc length of 24.93 feet to the intersection with the easterly line of Fallon Road, said point being at Engineer’s Station 101+18.79, being also the POINT OF BEGNNING of this description; Thence along said easterly line North 2°06'44" East, 110.25 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave South, having a radius of 1,967.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears South 2°12'08" West; Thence leaving said easterly line along said curve, through a central angle of 7°39'15", an arc length of 262.77 feet to the beginning of a compound curve, having a radius of 250.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears South 9°51'22" West; Thence Easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 9°30'46", an arc length of 41.51 feet; Thence South 70°37'52" East, 41.62 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 375.00 feet; 6.1.h Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 4670 Willow Road Suite 250 Pleasanton California 94588 phone 925.396.7700 fax 925.396.7799 www.bkf.com May 30, 2019 BKF Job No: 20167083 Page 2 of 4 Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 5°57'45", an arc length of 39.02 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 1,956.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears South 13°24'23" West; Thence southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 27°03'19", an arc length of 923.63 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 1,918.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears North 40°27'42" East; Thence easterly along said curve lying parallel and 82.00 feet northerly of said Engineer’s Station Line, through a central angle of 40°26'03", an arc length of 1,353.55 feet; Thence South 89°58'21" East, 17.34 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 100.00 feet northerly of said Engineer’s Station Line North 62°23'31" East, 38.81 feet; Thence South 89°58'21" East, 69.84 feet; Thence South 61°48'50" East, 36.02 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 83.00 feet northerly of said Engineer’s Station Line South 89°58'21" East, 238.02 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 275.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 9°13'48", an arc length of 44.30 feet; Thence South 80°44'33" East, 40.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 225.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 9°13'48", an arc length of 36.25 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 70.00 feet northerly of said Engineer’s Station Line South 89°58'21" East, 2,040.71 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 3,070.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 24°23'10", an arc length of 1,306.65 feet; Thence South 65°35'11" East, 360.90 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 2,230.00 feet; Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 23°54'30", an arc length of 930.53 feet; Thence South 89°29'40" East, 259.51 feet; Thence North 58°07'26" East, 34.80 feet to the westerly line of Doolan Road; 6.1.h Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 4670 Willow Road Suite 250 Pleasanton California 94588 phone 925.396.7700 fax 925.396.7799 www.bkf.com May 30, 2019 BKF Job No: 20167083 Page 3 of 4 Thence along said westerly line South 0°25'40" West, 88.64 feet to the intersection with said Engineer’s Station Line at Station 182+15.06, said point being also North 75°43’58” West, 25.75 feet of a City of Livermore monument at the intersection of Doolan Road and N. Canyon Parkway as shown on that certain Parcel Map 7640, filed on June 13, 2001 in Book 256 of Maps at Pages 81 through 84, inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder of Alameda County; Thence leaving said point, and continuing along said line South 0°25'40" West, 87.61 feet; Thence leaving said westerly line North 47°57'11" West, 41.63 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 60.00 feet southerly of said Engineer’s Station Line North 89°29'40" West, 257.98 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 2,360.00 feet; Thence westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 23°54'30", an arc length of 984.78 feet; Thence North 65°35'11" West, 360.90 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 2,940.00 feet; Thence westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 24°23'10", an arc length of 1,251.32 feet; Thence North 89°58'21" West, 2,400.18 feet; Thence South 48°02'19" West, 41.66 feet; Thence South 0°21'44" West, 12.13 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 100.00 feet southerly of said Engineer’s Station Line North 89°58'21" West, 74.10 feet; Thence North 53°39'17" West, 47.28 feet; Thence along a line parallel and 72.00 feet southerly of said Engineer’s Station Line North 89°58'21" West, 8.99 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right, having a radius of 2,072.00 feet; Thence westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 39°57'41", an arc length of 1,445.13 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 1,778.00 feet, from said point a radial line bears South 39°59'20" West; Thence westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 38°07'45", an arc length of 1,183.23 feet; Thence South 49°17'04" West, 39.49 feet to the easterly line of Fallon Road; Thence along said easterly line North 2°06'44" East, 106.39 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing an area of 26.365 acres, more or less. 6.1.h Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 4670 Willow Road Suite 250 Pleasanton California 94588 phone 925.396.7700 fax 925.396.7799 www.bkf.com May 30, 2019 BKF Job No: 20167083 Page 4 of 4 END OF DESCRIPTION As shown on plat attached hereto and by this reference made part hereof as Exhibit B. For: BKF Engineers _________________________ Davis Thresh, P.L.S. No. 6868 5/30/2019 Dated 6.1.h Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) FALLON ROADDOOLAN ROADI-580CROAK ROAD2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 S YE V R U RONAEDL CEN S LID AINROFIACFO E T T A LS 6.1.h Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) FALLON ROAD DUBLIN BLVD1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) CROAK ROAD 1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) DOOLAN ROAD N. CANYONS PKWY1"=100' 6.1.h Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: 8. Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 19 AN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CERTIFYING AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC T REPORT AND ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDINGS, FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE DUBLIN BOULEVARD – NORTH CANYONS PARKWAY EXTENSION PROJECT (APNS 985-0027-002, 905-0001-006-03, 905-0001-005-02, 905-0001-004-04, 905-0001-004- 03, 905-0001-003-02, and 905-0001-001-02) WHEREAS, the City of Dublin (Dublin), in cooperation with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), City of Livermore (Livermore), Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) and Alameda County (County), proposes to extend Dub lin Boulevard from its current terminus at Fallon Road, approximately 1.5 miles eastward through eastern Dublin and an unincorporated portion of the County, terminating at the boundary between the County and Livermore city limits. Requested approvals inclu de a General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, and certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report, among other related actions. These planning and implementing actions are collectively known as the “Dublin Blvd Extension Project” or the “Project”; and WHEREAS, the Project footprint inside Dublin jurisdiction is approximately 18.5 acres generally bounded by the eastern Dublin jurisdictional limit, Fallon Road, I-580, and Central Parkway (APNs 985-0027-002, 905-0001-006-03, 905-0001-005-02, 905-0001-004-03, 905- 0001-004-04). The remainder of the Project footprint is 10.5 acres and is located inside Alameda County and the City of Livermore (APNs 905-0001-003-02, and 905-0001-001-02); and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. It was determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be prepared to analyze the Project; and WHEREAS, the City circulated a Notice of Preparation, dated May 18, 2017, to public agencies and interested parties for consultation on the scope of the EIR. The City also conducted a public scoping meeting on May 31, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City prepared a Draft EIR dated March 2019 for the proposed Project that reflected the City’s independent judgment and analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Project (SCH No. 2017052047). The Draft EIR is attached as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was circulated for a 45-day public review period from March 6, 2019 through April 22, 2019; and WHEREAS, the City received comments in ten (10) letters and emails from State, regional, and local agencies as well as interested individuals and organizations during the public 6.1.i Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: 9. Resolution Certifying an Environmental Impact Report and Adopting Environmental Findings under CEQA for the Dublin 2 review period and 1 additional letter from the Alameda Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) after the close of the comment period. In accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the City prepared written responses to all the comments received during the public comment period, including the letter from the LAFCO. WHEREAS, the City prepared a Final EIR (that includes the Responses to Comments), dated May 2019, for the proposed Project, which included an annotated copy of each comment letter identifying specific comments, responses to each specific comment, and clarifications and minor corrections to information presented in the Draft EIR. The F inal EIR is attached as Exhibit B to this Resolution and is incorporated herein by reference. The complete Project EIR incorporates the Draft EIR and the Final EIR together. The responses to comments provide the City’s good faith, reasoned analysis of the environmental issues raised by the comments. The Final EIR also contain minor clarifications and modifications to the Draft EIR; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR identified potentially significant environmental effects anticipated as a result of the Project such as, aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural and tribal cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards/hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise and vibration, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, utilities, and energy, most of which can be substantially reduced through mitigation measures; therefore, approval of the Project must include impact and mitigation findings as set forth in attached Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, some of the impacts cannot be lessened to a level of less than significant; therefore, approval of the Project must include findings regarding alternatives as set forth in attached Exhibit D, and must include a Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in attached Exhibit E; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the project on May 28, 2019 at which time they reviewed and considered the Draft and Final EIRs, and all reports, recommendations and testimony before them. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission approved Resolution 19-03 recommending that the City Council approve the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Planning Commission minutes and recommendation, a staff report, the Draft and Final EIRs, and all written and oral testimony at a duly noticed public hearing on August 20, 2019; and WHEREAS, Staff Report dated August 20, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project and Draft and Final EIR for the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Draft and Final EIRs reflect the City’s independent judgment and analysis on the potential for environmental impacts and constitute the Environmental Impact Report for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Draft and Final EIRs are separately bound documents, incorporated herein by reference, and are available for review in the City Public Works Department. The custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings for the Project is at the City of Dublin Public Works Department, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin CA 94568; and 6.1.i Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: 9. Resolution Certifying an Environmental Impact Report and Adopting Environmental Findings under CEQA for the Dublin 3 WHEREAS, a Mitigation and Monitoring Program, as required by CEQA, is contained in attached Exhibit F. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council certifies the following. A. The EIR for the Dublin Blvd Extension Project has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines. B. The EIR for the Dublin Blvd Extension Project was presented to and reviewed by the City Council prior to taking action on the Project. C. The EIR reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis as to the potential environmental effects of the Project. The EIR provides information to the decision- makers and the public on the environmental consequences of the Project. D. The EIR adequately describes the Project, its significant environmental impacts, mitigation measures and a reasonable range of alternatives to the Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council certifies the EIR consisting of the Draft EIR as set forth in Exhibit A and the Final EIR as set forth in Exhibit B, adopts the impact and mitigation findings set forth in Exhibit C, the findings regarding alternatives set forth in Exhibit D, the Statement of Overriding Considerations set forth in Exhibit E, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program set forth in Exhibit F, which exhibits A, B, C, D, E and F are incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 20th day of August 2019, by the following votes: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: _____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ City Clerk 6.1.i Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: 9. Resolution Certifying an Environmental Impact Report and Adopting Environmental Findings under CEQA for the Dublin Due to the size of this document, please use link below to view Exhibit A. Dublin Blvd Ext. Draft EIR with Appendices 6.1.j Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: 10. Exhibit A to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) Due to the size of this document, please use link below to view Exhibit B. Dublin Blvd Ext. Final EIR 6.1.k Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: 11. Exhibit B to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1 EXHIBIT C FINDINGS CONCERNING SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines sections 15091, the City Council hereby makes the following findings with respect to the potential for significant environmental impacts from the Dublin Boulevard-North Canyons Parkway Extension Project (“Project”) and means for mitigating those impacts. The impacts and mitigation measures in the following findings are summarized rather than set forth in full. The text of the Draft and Final EIR (EIR) should be consulted for a complete description of the impacts and mitigations. Findings pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21001 relating to Project Alternatives are made in Exhibit E. These findings do not attempt to describe the full analysis of each environmental impact contained in the EIR. Instead, the findings provide a summary description of each impact, describe the applicable mitigation measures identified in the EIR and adopted by the City, and state the findings on the significance of each impact after imposition of the adopted mitigation measures. A full explanation of these environmental findings and conclusions can be found in the EIR, and these findings hereby incorporate by reference the discussion and analysis in those documents supporting the EIR’s determinations regarding mitigation measures and the Project’s impacts and mitigation measures designed to address those impacts. The facts supporting these findings are found in the record as a whole for the Project. In making these findings, the City ratifies, adopts, and incorporates into these findings the analysis and explanation in the EIR, and ratifies, adopts, and incorporates in these findings the determinations and conclusions of the EIR relating to environmental impacts and mitigation measures, except to the extent any such de terminations and conclusions are specifically and expressly modified by these findings. SECTION 5.1 – AESTHETICS Impact AES-1: Implementation of the Project may result in degradation of the visual quality of the scenic hills to the north. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure AES-1: Construction areas disturbed for equipment access and staging will be returned to their pre-Project condition. This may include minor regrading or sweeping and revegetation. Graded areas to the north of the Project site will be vegetated with an erosion control seed mix to minimize the visual change to the hillside and ensure that the graded areas blend with the surrounding natural hillside environment to the extent feasible. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 2 Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Project mitigation requires Project construction access and staging areas be returned to pre-Project conditions, avoiding permanent visual changes, and that permanent areas of grading on the hillside are designed to be as natural-looking as possible. With the implementation of this mitigation, the impact will be less than significant. Impact AES-2: Retaining walls implemented as a part of the Project may disrupt the visual setting, thereby degrading visual quality. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure AES-2: In coordination with Dublin, the County, and Livermore, retaining walls will be designed to include the following components: • To reduce the visual impact of new retaining walls, aesthetic treatments consisting of color, texture and/or patterning will be applied to reduce visual impacts. The aesthetic treatment shall be context sensitive to the location. If concrete drainage ditches are required along the top of and behind the retaining walls, the ditch shall be stained to match the overall color of the wall. Aesthetic treatments will also reduce glare and deter graffiti, and shall be developed during the final design. • Where required, retaining wall cable safety railing should have black or brown vinyl cladding to make them less visually obtrusive and help them blend with the setting. • Concrete safety-shaped barriers should be sand blasted to a medium finish to minimize glare and deter graffiti. Barriers at the bottom of retaining walls are required to be stained or are required to match the overall wall color through techniques such as staining. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Project mitigation would require retaining walls to incorporate a variety of aesthetic treatments and measures to allow the structures to better blend with the natural setting. With the implementation of this mitigation, the impact will be less than significant. Impact AES-3: The Project would include trees along the roadway, introducing new vertical elements that could compromise the eligibility of I -580 as a State Scenic Highway. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 3 Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure AES-3: All landscaping and new plantings along the Dublin Boulevard Extension must be selected and implemented to maintain the eligibility of I-580 as a State Scenic Highway. The final selection of plantings must ensure that new planting would not substantially impede views of the landscape. Landscaping plans will be coordinated with Caltrans to ensure compatibility. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-3, impacts to the eligibility of I-580 as a State Scenic Highway would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure AES-3 would require new plantings to be coordinated with Caltrans and selected to avoid incompatibility with the natural setting and scenic views. With the implementation of this mitigation, the impact will be less than significant. Impact AES-4: Project construction would include new sources of temporary night time lighting and glare, which could affect drivers traveling adjacent to the Project construction area. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure AES-4: Appropriate light and glare screening measures, including the use of downward cast lighting, will be used in construction, staging, and laydown areas. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Project mitigation would require that construction-period light pollution and glare be reduced through the use of appropriate screening measures. With the implementation of this mitigation, the impact will be less than significant. SECTION 5.2 – AIR QUALITY Impact AIR-1: Construction of the Project would result in temporary air quality impacts related to fugitive dust. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 4 Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Implement the most current BAAQMD best management practices at the time of construction to control dust and exhaust. Best management practices issued by BAAQMD change over time, and may include but are not limited to: During any construction period ground disturbance, implement the following best management practices to control dust and exhaust: • All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. • All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. • All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. • All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour. • All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. • Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations CCR). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. • All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certifie d mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would implement BAAQMD- recommended best management practices. With implementation of this mitigation measure, fugitive dust from project construction would be greatly minimized, and would no longer have the potential to result in dust to an extent that it would result in an impact to localized air quality. With Mitigation Measure AQ-1, this impact would be less than significant. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 5 Less than Significant Impact: Construction equipment emissions. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure AQ-2: All off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet United States Environmental Protectio n Agency Tier 4 interim off-road emissions standards to the extent feasible. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: This mitigation measure will reduce construction-period emissions, further minimizing this to less-than-significant impact. SECTION 5.3 – BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Impact BIO-1.1: Project construction would result in 0.45 acres of direct and indirect temporary impacts to Congdon’s tarplant and its seedbanks, and seed banks of San Joaquin spearscale or prostrate vernal pool navarretia, if these are present within the construction footprint. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO-1: The following measures shall be implemented to avoid and minimize impacts to special-status plant species and to the other special-status plants that have seed banks that may overlap the construction footprint: • To the extent feasible, Project construction will avoid all occupied habitat for Congdon’s tarplant (which is also potential seed bank area for San Joaquin spearscale or prostrate vernal pool navarretia) plus a 50-foot buffer. • The mapped areas of Congdon’s tarplant will be clearly shown on all construction plans. • To avoid special-status plants, a buffer of at least 50 feet will be clearly delineated from the active work areas through installation of environmental sensitive area fencing to prevent inadvertent access. The work area for utility line removal will be bound by environmental sensitive area fencing. A qualified plant ecologist shall oversee fencing placement. • Work to remove the existing utility line for relocation within the Project site will proceed using the least impactful equipment necessary to minimize crushing, soil compaction, and erosion. Mitigation Measure BIO-2: The general avoidance and minimization measures detailed in the EACCS and the associated Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) shall be implemented. Implementation of the General Minimization Measures listed in the PBO for the EACCS will further avoid impacts and are required for all EACCS-compliant projects. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6 These avoidance and minimization measures include general measures that apply to all work, activity-specific measures designed to address anticipated effects of certain work activities or particular types of resources, and standard best management practices. Specifically, the Project would implement EACCS Measure GEN-1 through GEN-17, and PBO General Minimization Measure 1 through 19. These measures are listed in Table 5.3-3. Mitigation Measure BIO-3: To track recovery of temporarily impacted special-status plant populations, the actual area of impacts will be mapped and monitored for at least three years by a qualified plant ecologist. Prior to Project construction, an area to the south, outside the construction footprint and of a similar size and similar density of Congdon’s tarplant to the area to be impacted, will be identified and used as a reference area. Objectives during the monitoring will include removing any weed populations that may have become introduced due to disturbance, and to encourage grazing that benefits Congdon’s tarplant. By year three, if the Congdon’s tarplant density within the impacted area is not at least 50 percent of the reference area, or if there is more than 5 percent cover of Cal-Invasive Plant Council (IPC) high or moderate ecological impact invasive plants within the recovery area (not including non-native grasses), the portion of the population impacted by the Project will be considered permanently impacted and the Project will then be required to mitigate for the impacts as per the EACCS, which would require preservation in perpetuity and management per EACCS guidelines of a similar - sized area and number of plants at a 5:1 ratio (number of new plant individuals:number of impacted plant individuals). Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.2: The Project could result in the direct loss and indirect disturbance of California red-legged frogs and their habitat. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO-4: The Project will incorporate the following species-specific avoidance and minimization prescribed by the EACCS Measure AMPH-2: • A qualified biologist will conduct pre-construction surveys prior to activities. If individuals are found, work will not begin until they are moved out of the construction zone to a USFWS/CDFW approved relocation site. • A USFWS/CDFW -approved biologist shall be present for initial ground disturbing activities. • If the work site is within the typical dispersal distance of potential breeding habitat, barrier fencing will be constructed around the worksite to prevent amphibians from 6.1.l Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 7 entering the work area. Contact USFWS/CDFW for latest research on this distance for species of interest. Barrier fencing will be removed within 72 hours of completion of work. The Project site is known to be within dispersal distance of potential breeding habitat for California red -legged frog and California tiger salamander, and therefore barrier fencing consisting of silt f ence and orange construction zone fencing will be installed on the northern and southern boundaries of the Project site where construction activities border grassland habitat. The barrier fencing will be at least 3 feet high and the lower 6 inches of the f ence will be buried in the ground to prevent animals from crawling under. The remaining 2.5 feet will be left above ground to serve as a barrier for animals moving on the ground surface. • No monofilament plastic will be used for erosion control. • Construction personnel will inspect open trenches in the morning and evening for trapped amphibians. • A qualified biologist possessing a valid FESA Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit or USFWS-approved under an active biological opinion, will be contracted to trap and to move amphibians to nearby suitable habitat if amphibians are found inside a fenced area. No trapping, such as the use of upland traplines for California red - legged frogs or California tiger salamanders, is proposed for this Project. However, a biologist approved by the USFWS under the Project’s Biological Opinion and by the CDFW under the Project’s Incidental Take Permit will survey for and relocate any individuals found within the impact area. The applicant will prepare a relocation plan for the Project to be reviewed and approved by the USFWS and CDFW prior to the onset of construction. • Work within suitable habitat will be avoided from 15 October (or the first measurable fall rain of 1 inch or greater) to 1 May. Mitigation Measure BIO-5: Compensatory mitigation for the permanent direct and indirect loss of California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander habitat would be required in accordance with the measures outlined in Tables 3-7 and 3‐8 of the EACCS. Mitigation will take the form of purchase of mitigation credits from a mitigation bank or Project-specific mitigation, or other mitigation plan as approved by the USFWS and CDFW in the Project’s permits. The ratio of mitigation to impact varies with the location of the proposed mitigation, and would be 2.5:1 at minimum, but may be as high as 4:1 (acreage of new habitat:acreage of impacted habitat). Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, t he Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.3: Project construction could result in the direct loss and indirect disturbance of California tiger salamanders and their habitat. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 8 6.1.l Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 9 Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures BIO-2, BIO-4, and BIO-5 (discussed above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.4: The Project would result in permanent and temporary impacts to foraging habitat for tricolored blackbird. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure BIO-6: If dense stands of cattails regenerate within the proposed construction footprint prior to Project construction, the Project shall implement the following measures to avoid impacts to tricolored blackbird nesting colonies: • If work is initiated within the nesting season (i.e., February 1 to August 31), then a preconstruction survey for an active nesting colony of tricolored blackbirds shall be conducted within all perennial marsh and seasonal wetland habitats on and within 250 feet of the construction footprint. • (EACCS Measure BIRD-3): If an active nest colony is identified within 250 feet of the construction footprint, work within 250 feet of the colony will be conducted outside of the nesting season (March 15 to September 1). Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measure, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.5: Project construction may result in mortality to individual western pond turtles and their eggs. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-4 (discussed above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 10 Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.6: Project construction may result in mortality to individual San Joaquin kit foxes, should they be present within the construction footprint. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure BIO-7: A qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for San Joaquin kit fox and their dens prior to the start of construction activities. In the event that the species is detected during the preconstruction survey, avoidance of impacts to occupied kit fox dens will be implemented per the Standardized Recommendations for Protection of The San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior To Or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS 1999) and EACCS Measure MAMM-1 (outlined below): • If potential dens are present, their disturbance and destruction will be avoided. • If potential dens are located within the construction footprint and cannot be avoided during construction, a qualified biologist will determine if the dens are occupied or were recently occupied using methodology coordinated with the USFWS and CDFW. If unoccupied, the qualified biologist will collapse these dens by hand in accordance with USFWS procedures (USFWS 1999). • Exclusion zones will be implemented following USFWS procedures (USFWS 1999) or the latest USFWS procedures available at the time. The radius of these zones will follow current standards or the following standards listed in the PBO for the EACCS: • Potential Den – A total of 4-5 flagged stakes will be placed 50 feet from the den entrance to identify the den location; • Known Den – Orange construction barrier fencing will be installed between the construction work area and the known den site at a minimum distance of 100 feet from the den. The fencing will be maintained until all construction -related disturbances have been terminated. At that time, all fencing will be removed to avoid attracting subsequent attention to the den; • Natal or Pupping Den – The USFWS will be contacted immediately if a natal or pupping den is discovered at or within 200 feet from the boundary of the construction area. • Pipes will be capped and trenches will contain exit ramps to avoid direct mortality while construction areas are active. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 11 Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measure, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.7: Project construction could result in the direct loss and indirect disturbance of burrowing owls and their habitat. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-5 (discussed above) Mitigation Measure BIO-8: A qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting burrowing owls prior to construction. As feasible, all suitable habitat within 0.5 mile of the Project site shall be surveyed for nesting burrowing owls. The survey should be conducted during the burrowing owl’s nesting season, defined by the EACCS as March 15 to September 1. This survey shall consist of two or more site visits, with the biologist examining all potential burrows within 0.5 mile, as access permi ts, for signs of nesting burrowing owls (i.e., owls, pellets, feathers, and/or whitewash). Should these surveys identify burrowing owls on or near the BSA, avoidance of disturbance to the burrow will be conducted per EACCS Measure BIRD-2, outlined below: • If an active burrowing owl nest is identified near a proposed work area, work will be conducted outside of the nesting season (March 15 to September 1). • If an active nest is identified near a proposed work area and work cannot be conducted outside of the nesting season, a qualified biologist will establish a no- activity zone. The no activity zone will be large enough to avoid nest abandonment and will at minimum be 250-foot radius from the nest. • If burrowing owls are present within the construction footprint during the non- breeding period, a qualified biologist will establish a no-activity zone of at least 150 feet. • If an effective no-activity zone cannot be established in either case, an experienced burrowing owl biologist will develop a site-specific plan (i.e., a plan that considers the type and extent of the proposed activity, the duration and timing of the activity, and the sensitivity and habituation of the owls, and the dissimilarity of the proposed activity with background activities) to minimize the potential to affect the reproductive success of the owls. Mitigation Measure BIO-9: The EACCS identifies burrowing owl nesting habitat as suitable habitat within 0.5 mile of a documented nest occurrence during the previous 3 years, and it recommends compensatory mitigation in the event of any impacts to such habitat. In the event that burrowing owls are found to be nesting on or within 0.5 mile of the Project site during preconstruction surveys, or if owls need to be evicted from burrows (which can only occur when they are not actively nesting) to implement the Project, compensatory mitigation will be necessary to mitigate for impacts on occupied burrowing owl habitat. If the California red-legged frog/California tiger salamander habitat mitigation provides suitable habitat for burrowing owls as well, then no additional mitigation for impacts to burrowing owls would be necessary. Otherwise, additional habitat mitigation will be necessary, in the form of purchase of mitigation credits from a mitigation b ank or 6.1.l Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 12 Project-specific mitigation in an area that supports such habitat. The EACCS prescribes mitigation ratios of 3:1 to 3.5:1 (acreage of new habitat:acreage of impacted habitat), depending on the location of the mitigation site. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.8: The Project could result in the direct loss and indirect disturbance of American badgers and their habitat, should they be present within the construction footprint. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO-2 (discussed above) Mitigation Measure BIO-10: A qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys for denning American badgers prior to construction. As feasible, all suitable habitat within 0.5 mile of the Project site shall be surveyed for American badgers. The survey will be conducted for the area in which the qualified biologist can access. This survey can be conducted concurrently with the burrowing owl survey outlined in Mitigation Measure BIO - 8. This survey shall consist of two or more site visits, with the biologist examining all potential burrows within 0.5 mile, as access permits, for American badger dens. Should these surveys identify American badgers on or near the BSA, avoidance of disturbance to the den will be conducted per EACCS Measure MAMM-1 outlined in Mitigation Measure BIO-7. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.9: Project construction would result in the loss of foraging habitat and prey habitat for bats, and could temporarily alter foraging patterns in the immediate vicinity. Additionally, Project construction could indirectly result in mortality of bats and their young, if present within the construction footprint. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 13 Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO-2 (discussed above) Mitigation Measure BIO-11: A qualified bat biologist will conduct a pre-construction/pre- demolition survey for roosting bats within 15 days prior to the commencement of construction activities within 400 feet of trees or buildings providing potential roosting habitat. The survey will focus on detecting bats that may be day -roosting in trees within or immediately adjacent to (i.e., within 100 feet of) the impact areas. If suitable roost sites are found and a visual survey is not adequate to determine presence or absence of bats, acoustical equipment will be used to determine occupancy. If no evidence of bat roosts is found, any buildings or trees that contain potential roosting sites and are proposed for removal will be removed within 15 days following completion of the survey. If a day roost is found during the maternity season (1 April until the young are flying, typically by 31 August) within 400 feet of the impact areas, a qualified bat biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the width of a buffer that will be established around the roost. No construction-related activity shall occur within the buffer during the maternity season. Typical buffers recommended between intense construction activity and pallid bat roosts are: 90 feet for motor vehicles and foot traffic, 120 feet for heavy equipment, 150 feet for trenching, 250 feet for idling equipment or generators, 250 feet for shielded lighting, and 400 feet for unshielded lighting. No tree or structure containing a maternity roost will be removed or otherwise physically disturbed during the maternity season. Outside the maternity season, a day roost may be removed after individual bats are safely evicted under the direction of a qualified bat biologist. Eviction will occur between 1 September and 31 March, but will not occur during long periods of inclement or cold weather (as determined by the bat biologist) when prey are not available or bats are in torpor. If feasible, one-way doors will be used to evict bats. If use of a one -way door is not feasible, or the exact location of the roost entrance is not known, the roosts that need to be removed shall first be disturbed by the bat biologist. Such disturbance will occur at dusk to allow bats to escape during the darker hours. These buildings or trees shall then be removed the following day. All of these activities will be performed under the supervision of the bat biologist. Mitigation Measure BIO-12: Compensatory mitigation for impacts on active bat roosts would not be warranted unless a maternity roost of pallid bats or Townsend’s big -eared bats will be lost. In this instance, the provision of one or more alternate roost structures would be appropriate to reduce impacts on special-status bat species. If a pallid bat or Townsend’s big-eared bat day roost is located within a tree or building to be removed, an alternative bat roost structure will be provided by the City of Dublin and its partners. The design and placement of this structure will be determined by a bat biologist, in consultation with the CDFW, based on the location of the original roost and the habita t conditions in the vicinity. The roost structure will be built to specifications as determined by a bat biologist and CDFW, or it may be purchased from an appropriate vendor. The structure will be placed as close to the impacted roost site as feasible. Th is bat structure will be erected at least one month prior to removal of the original roost structure. A bat biologist 6.1.l Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 14 will monitor this structure during the breeding season for up to two years following completion of the Project, or until it is found to be occupied by bats (whichever occurs first), to provide information for future projects regarding the effectiveness of such structures in minimizing impacts to bats. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.10: Project construction could result in take of a special-status individual bird, egg, or nest, should an individual be foraging or nesting within the construction footprint during construction. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO-2 (discussed above) Mitigation Measure BIO-13: Project implementation shall include the following measures to comply with the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code and avoid death or injury of special-status birds or their active nests, eggs, or young. • Avoidance of the Nesting Bird Season. If feasible, Project activities will be scheduled to avoid the avian nesting season. If such activities are scheduled to take place outside the nesting season, all impacts on nesting birds, including raptors, protected under the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code, would be avoided. The nesting season for most birds in Alameda County typically extends from February 1 through August 31, although in most years, a majority of birds have finished nesting by August 1. • Vegetation Removal during the Non -Nesting Season. If Project activities will not be initiated until after the start of the nesting season, potential nesting substrate (e.g., bushes, trees, grasses, and other vegetation) that is scheduled to be removed may be removed prior to the start of the nesting season (e.g., prior to 1 February) to reduce the potential for initiation of nests. If it is not feasible to schedule vegetation removal during the nonbreeding season, or where vegetation cannot be removed (e.g., in areas immediately adjacent to the site), then pre- construction surveys for nesting birds will be conducted as described below. Sensitive and/or regulated wetland vegetation would not be removed prior to construction, if feasible. • Pre-construction/Pre-disturbance Surveys for Nesting Birds. If it is not possible to schedule Project activities between September 1 and February 1, then a qualified biologist will conduct pre-construction surveys for nesting birds to ensure that no nests will be disturbed during Project implementation. These surveys will be conducted no more than one week prior to the initiation of Project activities. During 6.1.l Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 15 this survey, a qualified biologist will inspect all potential nesting habitats (e.g., trees, shrubs, grasslands, and structures) within 300 feet of impact areas for raptor nests and within 100 feet of impact areas for nests of non -raptors. Surveys for burrowing owls and nesting golden eagles will extend out to 0.5 mile from the Project site (to the extent that such areas are accessible) • Buffers around Active Nests. If an active nest (i.e., a nest with eggs or young, or any completed raptor nest attended by adults) is found sufficiently close to the construction footprint to be disturbed by these activities, the biolo gist, in consultation with CDFW, will determine the extent of a disturbance-free buffer zone to be established around the nest to ensure that no nests of species protected by the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code will be disturbed during Project implementation. Typical buffers are 0.25 mile (or 0.5 -mile line-of-sight) for golden eagles, 250 feet for burrowing owls, 300 feet for other raptors, and 50 -100 feet for non-raptors. Because the majority of the site is already subject to disturbance by vehicles and pedestrians, activities that will be prohibited from occurring within the buffer zone around a nest will be determined on a case-by-case basis by a qualified biologist. In general, activities prohibited within such a buffer while a nest is active will be limited to new construction-related activities (i.e., activities that were not ongoing when the nest was constructed) involving significantly greater noise, human presence, or vibrations than were present prior to nest initiation. • Nest Deterrence. If necessary to avoid impacts to active nests, nest starts may be removed on a regular basis (e.g., every second or third day), starting in late January or early February to prevent active nests from becoming established. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-1.11: Project construction could result in impacts to migratory bird species, their eggs, or nests, should an individual be foraging or nesting within the construction footprint during construction. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-13 (discussed above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 16 Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-2: The Project may adversely affect riparian habitat and other sensitive natural communities at the Project site, through temporary disturbance durin g construction and permanent loss of natural areas through conversion to a multi - modal roadway. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures BIO-5 (discussed above) Mitigation Measure BIO-14: Project implementation shall include the following measures to reduce riparian habitat impacts: • All riparian areas and riparian trees to be preserved will be clearly depicted on final Project plans. Areas to be avoided shall be indicated and protected at the site using orange sensitive area fencing to ensure inadvertent impacts do not occur. • No equipment will be staged or refueled in the riparian areas along Cottonwood Creek. • All appropriate AMMs listed in the EACCS that would apply to and protect these riparian habitats will be enacted. Mitigation Measure BIO-15: The valley oak tree to be avoided during implementation of the Project will be protected with a tree protection zone, developed under the consultation of a qualified, International Society of Arborists-certified arborist. This tree protection zone may be larger than the drip line of the tree, as determined by the qualified arborist, and will be delineated with orange construction fencing. No fill placement, equipment access, or materials stockpiling may occur within the tree protection zone, unless approved by the qualified arborist (for example for crown trimming, if needed). Mitigation Measure BIO-16: The permanent loss of riparian habitat types shall be mitigated as described in the EACCS. Mitigation will be provided via preservation, enhancement, and management as per EACCS guidelines. Because all riparian habitats in the construction footprint provide habitat for focal species, the mitigation ratio for the impacts will be at least 2.5:1 (acreage of new habitat: acreage of impacted habitat). Because the wetland and stream habitats all provide dispersal and foraging habitat for California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander, the final mitigation ratio must be as high as the determined EACCS requirements for focal species. Mitigation ra tios will vary based on the location and quality of the mitigation lands, which have not been selected yet. Mitigation must be in-kind for mixed riparian woodland impacts but riparian grassland impacts may be mitigated with either grassy or wooded riparian habitat. Temporary impacts to riparian habitat shall be restored in place at a 1:1 ratio through re - establishment of original contours along banks, decompaction of compacted soils where necessary, and seeding with a native seed mix developed by a qualifie d restoration ecologist and containing species such as alkali barley (Hordeum depressum), meadow barley (Hordeum brachyantherum), purple needlegrass (Stipa purpurea), and/or other 6.1.l Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 17 native grass and forb species that occur in the Project vicinity. Temporary impact areas will be monitored for 2 years and the criteria for success will be 75 percent vegetation cover or more compared to pre-Project conditions and no more than 5 percent cover of Cal-IPC-rated moderate and high impact weed species (excluding Cal-IPC-rated annual grasses). Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-3: The Project may adversely affect protected wetlands through temporary placement of construction equipment, construction access, grading, placement of Project fill material, and permanent roadway improvements. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure BIO-5 (described above) Mitigation Measure BIO-17: The following measures shall be implemented to reduce aquatic resource impacts: • All wetlands and streams shall be clearly depicted on final Project plans. Areas to be avoided shall be indicated and protected at the site using orange sensitive area fencing to ensure inadvertent impacts do not occur. • Final grading plans shall be developed that minimize grading-related fill and cut in wetlands and streams to the maximum extent feasible to achieve Project goals and improvements. • Work within streams and wetlands would be restricted to the dry season from April 15 to October 15 (or as directed by regulatory permitting agency) to protect water quality. • All appropriate AMMs listed in the EACCS that would apply to and protect these aquatic habitats will be enacted. • No bioswales or other stormwater infrastructure, or non -critical Project elements such as landscaping, will be placed in wetlands or streams. • All temporary fills placed in the Cottonwood Creek low-flow channel for construction access will be clean fills (such as clean rock) of a size that can be fully removed from the low-flow channel and the channel then restored to its former topography. • The Project applicant will implement best management practices (BMPs) as recommended or required by the State or RWQCB to protect water quality. These measures will include, but are not limited to the following: o No debris, soil, silt, sand, bark, slash, sawdust, cement, concrete, washings, petroleum products or other organic or earthen material will be allowed to 6.1.l Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 18 enter into or be placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the US/State or aquatic habitat. o No equipment will be operated in the live stream channel. o Equipment staging and parking areas shall occur within established access areas in upland habitat above the top of bank. o Machinery or vehicle refueling, washing, and maintenance shall occur at least 60 feet from the top-of-bank. Equipment shall be regularly maintained to prevent fluid leaks. Any leaks shall be captured in containers until the equipment is moved to a repair location. A spill prevention and response plan will be prepared prior to construction and will be implemented immediately for cleanup of fluid or hazardous materials spills. o Standard erosion control and slope stabilization measures will be required for work performed in any area where erosion could lead to sedimentation of a waterbody. o The Project will comply with the MRP and General Construction permit to prevent increases in peak flow, erosion, or reduction in water quality for downslope waters. Mitigation Measure BIO-18: The permanent loss of waters and wetlands shall be mitigated per the EACCS. Mitigation will be provided via preservation, enhancement, and management as per EACCS guidelines. This may be purchased as bank credits or managed as a Project-specific mitigation site. Because all wetland and stream habitats in the Project site provide habitat for focal species, the mitigation ratio for the impacts will be at least 2.5:1 (acreage of new habitat:acreage of impacted habitat). Because the wetland and stream habitats all provide dispersal and foraging habitat for California red- legged frog and California tiger salamander, the final mitigation ratio must be as high as the determined EACCS requirements for focal species. The required mitigation ratio will vary based on the location and quality of the mitigation lands, which have not been selected yet. Additionally, compensatory mitigation for wetlands and waters must be provided in-kind (wetlands for wetlands and streams for streams). Temporary impacts to these waters and wetlands will be resto red in place at a 1:1 ratio through re-establishment of original contours in stream channels and wetlands, decompaction of compacted soils where necessary, and seeding with a native wetland seed mix developed by a qualified restoration ecologist containing species such as alkali barley and Mexican rush. Temporary impact areas will be monitored for 2 years and the criteria for success will be 75 percent vegetation cover or more compared to pre -Project conditions and no more than 5 percent cover of Cal-IPC-rated moderate and high impact weed species (excluding Cal-IPC-rated annual grasses). Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 19 Impact BIO-4: The Project may interfere with species migration through segmentation of habitat within the BSA and disruption of nesting birds during Project construction. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures BIO-5 and BIO-13 (described above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. Impact BIO-5: Without proper mitigation implementing the East Alameda County Conservation Strategy, the Project could conflict with the goals, objectives, and mitigation criteria contained in that strategy. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measures BIO-2 through BIO-10, BIO-14, BIO-16, BIO-17, and BIO-18 (described above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With the implementation of the mitigation measures, the impact will be less than significant. SECTION 5.4 – CULTURAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Impact CUL-1: The Project could result in damage to or destruction of the historic- period archeological resource identified within the construction footprint (Corral Site), as a result of grading and excavation during construction. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure CUL-1: The following measures shall be implemented prior to construction of the Project, and during construction of the Project, to ensure known and potential historic-period archeological resources at the Corral Site are properly documented and/or collected: 6.1.l Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 20 • Prior to construction, surface remnants will be documented by a professionally qualified archaeologist with appropriate qualifications in historic-period archaeology. Surface remnants may be collected for further study, at the discretion of the archaeologist. • Prior to construction, recommendations for subsurface investigation outlined in the Archeological Survey Report prepared for the Project shall be implemented. A subsurface testing plan shall be prepared and executed by a professionally qualified archeologist with appropriate qualifications in historic-period archeology. The plan shall allow for, and outline requirements for, the documentation, collection, analysis, and curation of historic artifacts encountered during subsurface testing. • The report shall outline any further recommendations for the site, which may include additional site testing, construction protocols to avoid the destruction of resources on-site through documentation and collection, or other measures. The City of Dublin shall evaluate recommendations of this report and implement measures as feasible to further aid in resource documentation and collection at the site. • In addition to measures provided in the written report, a professionally qualified historic archeologist shall be present on-site when construction activities take place within the resource area. The need for on -site monitoring on a day-to-day basis shall be at the discretion of the historic archeologist. If artifacts or other historic archeological resources associated with the site are encountered during construction, work shall be halted within 25 feet of the discovery until the historic archeologist has evaluated the discovery. The historic archeologist shall determine whether the artifacts and/or resources are significant and warrant documentation and/or recovery, or whether they are not significant and no further action is warranted. • Any significant artifacts or other historic archeological resources encountered during construction shall be documented, collected, analyzed, and/or curated as appropriate so that their informational, research, and/or scientific value may be preserved. The appropriate treatment of artifacts and historic archeological resources encountered shall be determined by the professionally qualified historic archeologist. • The results of surface resource documentation and subsurface testing shall be documented in a written report prepared by the qualified historic archaeologist and submitted to the City of Dublin. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 requires that further investigation of the Corral Site be completed prior to Project construction, including subsurface investigation, to more accurately characterize and evaluate the site’s potential value as a historic-period archeological resource. This mitigation measure further requires 6.1.l Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 21 that a professionally qualified archeologist specializing in historic-period archeology (historic archeologist) evaluate the site after subsurface investigation, and that any further documentation and/or collection of artifacts from the site recommended by the historic archeologist be completed prior to Project construction. This will ensure that the site’s potential informational value is not lost, and the research and/or scientific value of items at the surface or identified during subsurface investigation are preserved through documentation and collection. Further, this mitigation measure requires on -site monitoring during construction in this area, and requires work be halted if additional elements of the site are encountered during construction, so evaluation, documentation, and collection efforts can occur. With implementation of this mitigation measure, the impact would be less than significant. Impact CUL-2: The Project could result in damage to or destruction of unidentified buried archeological resources as a result of grading and excavation during construction. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure CUL-2: If buried archaeological resources are discovered during construction, operations shall stop within 50 feet of the find and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to evaluate the resource in accordance with CEQA Guidelines 15064.5. Archeological resources may include, but are not limited to, glass, metal, ceramics, wood, privies, trash deposits or similar debris. A standard inadvertent discovery clause shall be included in the construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. If after evaluation it is determined the resource does not qualify as a significant resource, then no further protection or study is necessary. If the resource does qualify as a significant resource then the archaeologist shall make recommendations concerning appropriate mitigation measures that shall be implemented to protect the resources, including but not limited to monitoring, excavation, and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2 would require consultation with a qualified archeologist in the event of the discovery of buried archaeological resources, ensuring any discovered resource would be evaluated and, if recommended, collected to allow the resource’s informational value to be investigated. With implementation of this mitigation measure, this impact would be reduced to a less - than-significant level. Impact CUL-3: The Project could result in damage to or destruction of unidentified buried archeological resources as a result of grading and excavation during construction. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 22 Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure CUL-3: The following measures will ensure that any paleontological resources encountered during Project construction would be properly handled, evaluated, and curated to ensure their value to paleontological research is preserved. • A principal paleontologist shall be retained and shall determine when and where monitoring will be required, and who will conduct it. Monitoring shall be required where excavation at depths greater than 2 to 3 fe et is being undertaken. The principal paleontologist shall have the authority to halt work in the event that paleontological specimens are discovered, until assessment and appropriate salvage (if needed) is completed. • The principal paleontologist or anoth er mitigation program staff member shall coordinate with appropriate construction contractor personnel to provide information regarding applicable requirements concerning protecting paleontological resources. Contractor personnel, particularly heavy equipm ent operators, shall also be briefed on procedures to be followed in the event that fossil remains and/or a currently unrecorded fossil site is encountered by earthmoving activities, particularly if a paleontological construction monitor is not present on the site at the time of the discovery. Additional briefing shall be presented to new contractor personnel as necessary. Names and telephone numbers of the monitor and other appropriate mitigation program personnel shall be provided to appropriate contractor personnel. • When required, monitoring shall consist of visually inspecting freshly exposed cuts and spoil piles for the discovery and recovery of larger fossil remains, and periodically dry test screening to allow for the discovery and recovery of smaller fossil remains. If larger vertebrate fossils are noted by construction workers or monitors, excavation there will cease, and the monitor will be notified. • The monitor and recovery staff will salvage all larger vertebrate fossil remains, as soon as practicable and as quickly as possible, following Society of Vertebrate Paleontology protocols. The monitor shall document the location and proper geologic context of any recovered fossil occurrence or rock or sediment samples. Any recovered rock or sediment sample shall be processed to allow for the recovery of smaller fossil remains that normally are too small to be observed by the monitor. • If the principal paleontologist or monitor determines that the fossil site is too unproductive or the fossil remains not worthy of recovery by the monitor, no further action will be taken to preserve the fossil site or remains, and earthmoving activities shall be allowed to proceed through the site immediately. • The monitor shall maintain daily monitoring logs that include the particular tasks accomplished, the earthmoving activity monitored, the location where monitoring was conducted, the rock unit(s) encountered, the fossil specimens recovered, and associated specimen data and corresponding geologic and geographic site data. A final technical report of results and findings shall be prepared by the principal paleontologist in accordance with any local jurisdictional requirements (including those of the City of Dublin, Alameda County, and City of Livermore as appropriate) 6.1.l Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 23 and archived at a repository mutually approved by the jurisdiction and principal paleontologist. • Consistent with Federal and State law, if fossils are discovered during grading, the principal paleontologist must be called to the site to develop a mitigation plan to protect those resources. • All fossil specimens recovered as a result of mitigation, including those recovered as the result of processing rock or sediment samples, will be treated (i.e., prepared, identified, curated, catalogued) in accordance with designated museum repository requirements. Rock or sediment samples will be submitted to commercial laboratories for microfossil, pollen, radiometric dating, or other analysis, as appropriate. The Project site lies in Alameda County. If paleontological specimens are encountered and collected at the site during mitigation, they become property of the County and should be properly curated at an approved facility (local to the Project location or a museum) and preserved for future research. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-3 would involve retention of a principal paleontologist to monitor construction period activities, to ensure that any paleontological resources encountered are evaluated and, if recommended, recovered and appropriately curated to allow those resources to contribute to the body of paleontological research in the Bay Area. With implementation of this mitigation measure, this impact would be reduced to less than significant. Impact CUL-4: The Project could result in damage to or destruction of unidentified buried tribal cultural resources as a result of grading and excavation during construction. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure CUL-4: The following measures shall be implemented to ensure that any tribal cultural objects or items encountered during Project construction are properly identified and evaluated, and avoided or preserved. • A culturally-affiliated Native American with knowledge of cultural resources shall be identified and agreed upon by the City of Dublin and local tribes listed by the NAHC and shall be present to monitor all ground-disturbing activities. • If tribal cultural objects or items are encountered, the treatment of those objects or items shall be considered in coordination with culturally-affiliated Native Americans. If avoidance or preservation in place is preferred, avoidance or preservation in place will be completed where feasible and agre ed upon by culturally-affiliated Native Americans and the local jurisdiction. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 24 • Tribal cultural objects or items encountered during Project construction shall be treated with culturally appropriate dignity, taking into account the tribal cultural values and meaning of the resource. • The disposition of recovered tribal cultural items that are not burial-associated shall be coordinated in consultation with culturally-affiliated Native Americans. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: In the event that a tribal cultural resource is discovered during Project construction, Mitigation Measure CUL-4 would be implemented. This mitigation measure requires a culturally-affiliated Native American with knowledge of tribal cultural resources to be present to monitor all ground disturbing activities. Should any triba l cultural resources be discovered, consultation with culturally-affiliated Native Americans is required to determine how to treat said resource. With the incorporation of Mitigation Measure CUL-4, this impact would be less than significant. SETION 5.5 – GEOLOGY AND SOILS Impact GEO-1: People and structures may be exposed to risks associated with slope stability, liquefaction, and seismically-induced settlement at or near Project site. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure GEO-1: As part of the final design phase, preparation of a design- level geotechnical and geologic report will be required and will include subsurface field work and laboratory testing. Site specific subsurface soil conditions and slope stabilities within the Project site will be verified during the preparation of this report to determine the appropriate final design for the Project. Recommendations from the design -level report will be incorporated into the Project design. Future subsurface exploration will include soil borings at appr oximate 500-foot intervals along the roadway extension. Soil borings will determine the geologic stability of soils underlying the Project site. In addition, borings will specifically be performed for cut slopes over 8 feet, at retaining wall locations, at bridge support locations, and at culvert crossing locations. Additional borings may be necessary for other Project components, at the discretion of the City of Dublin or the Responsible Agency in their jurisdiction and on the recommendation of professionally qualified specialists. The field investigation will consider Project design details to provide design recommendations. Key considerations shall include the following: • Liquefaction. The design-level geotechnical report shall evaluate liquefaction potential at the Cottonwood Creek crossing to determine the need for foundation elements deeper than those required for structural loading purposes. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 25 • Slope Stability. The Project would include cuts and fills throughout the Project site. Cut/fill slopes will be addressed in the design-level geotechnical report to evaluate the need for selective grading provisions to mitigate the potential for clayey materials in fill slopes, which could create slope stability issues. Selective grading provisions, if necessary, will avoid this risk. In addition, the design-level geotechnical report will also evaluate the suitability of existing soils for re -use as fill material. If soils are not suitable to use as fill material, imported fill will be used where needed to ensure stability. • Corrosive Soils. The design-level geotechnical report will investigate for the presence of corrosive soils within the Project site. If corrosive soils are identified at locations where new subsurface facilities are proposed (e.g. bridge foundations, culverts, etc.) specially coated rebar, or alternative pipe culverts will be specified in the contract documents. • Expansive Soils. The design-level geotechnical report will investigate for the presence of expansive soils within the Project site. Depending on the extent of expansive soils and level of expansion potential, supplemental design measures such as lime-treatment, selective grading, or select import fill materials may be necessary. • Erosion Potential. The design-level geotechnical report will characterize the risk of increased erosion as a result of topography, soil characteristics, and Project design. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: The design-level geotechnical report required by Mitigation Measure GEO-1 (described below) would convey the need for selective grading provisions to mitigate the potential for clayey materials in fill slopes. In addition, the design-level geotechnical report will evaluate the suitability of existing soi ls for re-use as fill material based on the soil characteristics. With implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, this impact would be less than significant. Impact GEO-2: The Project may result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil during construction. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure GEO-1 (described above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 26 Rationale for Finding: Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would include the preparation of a design-level geotechnical report as part of the final design phase that would include subsurface field work and laboratory testing of soil samples. Site specific subsurface soil conditions (including erosion potential) and slope stabilities within the Project site will be verified during the preparation of this report to determine the appropriate final design for the Project. The design-level geotechnical report would characterize the risk of increased erosion as a result of topography, soil characteristics, and Pr oject design. Recommendations from the design-level report would be incorporated into the Project design. With implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO -1 and a SWPPP, which would reduce erosion potential, this impact would be less than significant. Impact GEO-3: With implementation of the Project, roadway users and the new Cottonwood Creek bridge may be exposed to risks associated with corrosive, expansive, or other unsuitable soils. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure GEO-1 (described above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: The design-level geotechnical report required by Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would investigate for the presence of expansive and corrosive soils within the Project site. Depending on the extent of expansive soils and level of expansion potential, design recommendations such as lime-treatment, selective grading or select import fill materials may be necessary and would be documented in the design -level geotechnical report. Design recommendations from the design-level geotechnical report would be incorporated into the final Project design. These design recommendations would reduce the potential for risk associated with expansive and/or corrosive soils. Therefore, with application of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, this impact would be less than significant. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 27 SECTION 5.7 – HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Impact HAZ-1: Project construction could expose construction workers and future users to soil contamination from past uses of the Project site and surrounding areas, including pesticides and/or petrochemicals from fuel. Mitigation Measures: Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: If petroleum-impacted soils or USTs are unexpectedly encountered during any construction activities, work in the area shall be temporarily halted and the corresponding jurisdiction (City of Dublin, the County, or Livermore) shall coordinate with the ACDEH to determine appropriate treatment and removal of the UST and contaminated soil. Mitigation Measure HAZ-2: Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permit, a limited soil investigation will be completed within the construction area to identify potential contamination from past petroleum hydrocarbons and any agrichemical contamination from agricultural use. • Soil samples will be collected and tested for residual pesticides by a qualified professional. Concentrations of agricultural contaminants will be compared to applicable State Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels. • Dublin shall prepare and submit a comprehensive report to the ACDEH, signed by a qualified environmental professional, documenting the presence or lack of petroleum hydrocarbons, agrichemicals, or other contaminants on the Project site. • If the soil investigation finds contaminants are present, Dublin, in cooperation with the County if needed, shall create and implement a remediation plan that ensures workers and future users of the Project are not exposed to concentrations in excess of screening levels or other risks associated with soil contamination in accordance with regulatory standards. • Potential safety measures could include soil removal and treatment, or protective work attire requirements for construction workers. • The remediation plan shall also include provisions to outline safe transportation and disposal techniques, and would prevent the handling of hazardous materials1 nearby sensitive educational facilities by delimiting work areas and hauling routes within 0.25 mile of a school. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. 1 In this context, hazardous materials include a hazardous substance (as defined in California Public Resources Code Section 21151.4) or a mixture containing extremely hazardous substances in a quantity equal to or greater than the state threshold specified pursuant to subdivision (j) of Section 25532 of the Health and Safety Code. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 28 Rationale for Finding: Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would be implemented to further protect worker safety. This measure requires a temporary halting of work until coordination with ACDEH is complete to ensure workers are not exposed to hazardous substances. With adherence to these regulations and Mitigation Measure HAZ -1, this impact would be less than significant. Impact HAZ-2: Project construction could require transportation of contaminated soils within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, if contaminated soils are found and removed from the construction footprint. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 (described above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: The remediation plan discussed under Mitigation Measure HAZ - 2 would include provisions to prevent the transportation of hazardous materials within 0.25-mile of educational facilities during hauling activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-2, this impact would be less than significant. SECTION 5.10 – NOISE AND VIBRATION Impact NOI-1: The Project would result in temporary noise increases during construction, which could exceed local standards. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure NOI-1: The following measures will be implemented during Project construction. • The Project contractor shall submit a Construction Noise Management Program that identifies measures proposed to minimize construction noise impacts on existing residents. • All construction equipment will conform to Section 14 -8.02, Noise Control, of the latest Standard Specifications. • In Dublin, all construction operations shall comply with local noise standards a nd be limited to normal daylight hours where feasible. All stationary equipment shall be adequately muffled and located away from sensitive receptors. The construction contractor shall limit all on-site noise-producing construction activities, including deliveries and warming up of equipment, to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., daily, where feasible. If work is necessary outside of these hours, the contractor shall acquire appropriate permits from the local jurisdiction and 6.1.l Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 29 implement a construction noise monitoring program, providing additional mitigation where practical and feasible. • In the County and Livermore, construction activities generating excessive noise will be limited to the hours specified in the appropriate local ordinance, where feasible. If work is necessary outside of these hours, the contractor shall acquire appropriate permits from the local jurisdiction and implement a construction noise monitoring program, providing additional mitigation where practical and feasible. • Pile driving activities in all jurisdictions will be limited to daytime hours only, when feasible. If pile driving outside of typical construction hours specified in this measure is required, the contractor shall acquire appropriate permits from the local jurisdiction and implement a construction noise monitoring program, providing additional mitigation where practical and feasible. • Equip all internal combustion-engine driven equipment with manufacturer recommended intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condit ion and appropriate for the equipment. • Locate stationary noise generating equipment and self -powered lighting systems as far as possible from sensitive receptors when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near the construction footprint • Utilize "quiet" air compressors and other "quiet" equipment where such technology exists. • Prohibit unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines within 100 feet of residences. • Avoid staging of construction equipment within 200 feet of noise -sensitive uses. • The construction contractor shall designate a noise disturbance coordinator who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the disturbance coordinator shall notify Dublin within 24 hours of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem, as deemed acceptable by the City of Dublin Community Development Department. The construction contractor shall conspicuously post the contact name and telephone number for the noise disturbance coordinator at the construction site. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: The incorporation of Best Management Practices required by Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would limit unnecessary noise generation. Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would reduce temporary construction noise impacts by restricting the hours of construction, eliminating unnecessary noise such as idling, requiring the use of quiet equipment where possible, limiting the proximity of construction equipment to sensitive receptors, and establishing a noise management plan and noise disturbance coordinator to respond to any complaints. This impact would be less than significant with Mitigation Measure NOI-1 incorporated. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 30 Impact NOI-2: Project construction activities could result in substantial temporary and periodic noise increases as a result of construction equipment operation and construction activities in the vicinity of sensitive receptors. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure NOI-1 (described above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1, construction work would comply with construction work hours within each jurisdiction, as feasible, and additional noise reduction and prevention measures such as mufflers would ensure temporary construction noise is not substantial. With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1, this impact would be less than significant. SECTION 5.12 – PUBLIC SERVICES Impact SERV-1: Project construction could temporarily result in interference with emergency services access as a result of construction work at the intersections of Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road and Doolan Road/North Canyons Parkway. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 (described below) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identifie d in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: This impact would be addressed through Mitigation Measure TRAF-1, as described in Section 5.14, Transportation and Traffic. This measure requires preparation of a traffic management plan (TMP), which would include press releases to notify and inform emergency services of upcoming road closures and detours, and coordination with emergency service providers to ensure that adequate service to the entire service area would be maintained during construction. For the above reasons, this impact would be less than significant with mitigation. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 31 SECTION 5.14 – TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC Impact TRAF-1.1: Project construction would result in a temporary increase in construction truck trips on local streets designated as truck routes and construction vehicle trips to and from the Project site. Project construction could require temporary closure of the Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road intersection and the Doolan Road/North Canyons Parkway intersection, and temporary closure of Croak Road while a new intersection is constructed, necessitating detours. Construction truck, equipment, and vehicle trips, and intersection closures and detours could result in temporary congestion at local intersections in Dublin and Livermore. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: A TMP shall be prepared during the design phase for the Project, in accordance with all local requirements. The TMP should address traffic impacts from staged construction, detours, and specific traffic handling concerns during construction of the Project, including multi-modal access. The objective of the TMP is to minimize the impacts that construction activities would have on the traveling public. Traffic management strategies that require action by the construction contractor should be presented in detail in the technical specifications of the bid contract, and should be considered part of the Project. In implementing the TMP, each jurisdiction should produce and disseminate press releases and other documents, as necessary, to adequately notify and inform motorists, pedestrians and cyclists, business community groups, local entities, emergency services, and elected officials of upcoming road closures and detours. This responsibility includes advance notification to local newspapers, television and radio stations, and emergency response providers. If agreed upon by Dublin, the County, and Livermore, Dublin as the lead agency may lead preparation and implementation of the TMP. Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 requires preparation of a traffic management plan (TMP) that would be coordinated between all three jurisdictions (Dublin, the County, and Livermore) and Caltrans, as construction and detour traffic may require use of I-580. The TMP would delineate appropriate traffic management during construction to minimize intersection congestion, detour routes, notification plans for the public and emergency service providers, and the continuation of existing pedestrian and bicycle access at detour locations where it would be feasible and safe to do so. With implementation of this mitigation measure, temporary congestion at local intersections would be reduced and the impact would be less than significant. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 32 Impact TRAF-1.2: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard during the AM peak hour over existing conditions. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-2: Dublin is to implement the following geometric and signal timing improvements at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road prior to the opening of the Dublin Boulevard Extension: • Implement the mitigation measures described in the Kaiser Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which includes the construction of an additional left turn lane for both the northbound and eastbound approaches. This improvement is the obligation of Kaiser and the City shall build and seek reimbursement from Kaiser if not built by the time the Dublin Boulevard – North Canyons Parkway Extension Project is built. • In addition to the mitigations proposed for the Kaiser EIR, Dublin shall implement the following improvements: • Northbound – construct at least one northbound right turn lane resulting in the following final lane configuration: 2 left turns, 2 through, and one right turn lane • Eastbound – construct at least one more through lane resulting in the following final lane configuration: 2 left turns, 2 through, and 2 rights • Westbound – construct at least two additional through lanes resulting in the following lane configuration: 1 left turn, 2 through, and a shared through/right • Optimize the signal timing Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 would improve the operation of this intersection to LOS D during the AM peak hour, reducing this impact to less than significant. Impact TRAF-1.3: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Airway Boule vard and North Canyons Parkway in Livermore during the AM peak hour over existing conditions. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-3: The City of Livermore is to implement the following geometric and signal timing improvements at the intersection of Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway prior to Project completion: • Shift the median of Airway Boulevard one lane to the west reducing the southbound lanes from three to two and increasing the northbound lanes from three to four 6.1.l Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 33 • With the extra northbound lane, convert the northbound approach to Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway to have an exclusive left, shared left/through, and two right turn lanes • Add an additional westbound through lane resulting in two left turns, one exclus ive through, and a shared through/right • Optimize the signal timing Resulting Significance: Significant unavoidable impact to Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway. Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would improve the operation of this intersection, reducing the impact to less than significant. However, because the intersection is outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the lead agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefo re, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of the Project. Rationale for Finding: With implementation of the Project, this intersection would experience significant growth to the northbound left turn with the demand exceeding 800 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour. The existing lane configuration of a single shared left and through lane for the northbound approach is insufficient to handle this demand. The Project would cause the LOS at this intersection to degrade from LOS D to LOS F in the AM peak hour due to an increase in northbound left turn traffic volumes. An intersection operation of LOS F would be below the LOS E standard for this intersection. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would improve the operation of this intersection to LOS D during the AM peak hour. However, because the intersection is in Livermore, outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction Dublin as the lead agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Dublin, the County, and Livermore are coordinating on the Project to meet their General Plan’s objectives including the planned extension of Dublin Boulevard. Dublin and Livermore currently have a funding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and are exploring a new cooperative agreement with Alameda County and the Alameda CTC to continue to work together to identify the funding and timing for this mitigation. Impact TRAF-1.4: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard during both the AM and PM peak hours under 2025 conditions. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 34 Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 would improve the operation of this intersection to LOS D during both the AM and PM peak hours. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 would reduce this impact to less than significant. Impact TRAF-1.5: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway during the AM peak hour under 2025 conditions. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Resulting Significance: Significant unavoidable impact to Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway. Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would improve the operation of this intersection, reducing the impact to less than significant. However, because the intersection is outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the lead agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of the Project. Rationale for Finding: With implementation of the Project, this intersection would experience significant growth in the northbound left turn, with the demand exceeding 800 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour. The existing lane configuration of a single shared lane for both left and through movements for the northbound approach is insufficient to handle this demand. The Project would cause the LOS to degrade from LOS D to LOS F in the AM peak hour, which is below the LOS E standard for this intersection. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would improve the operation of this intersection to LOS D during the AM peak hour. However, Dublin as the lead agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure, as it is outside the control and jurisdiction of the City. Therefore, this impact remains significant and unavoidable. Dublin, the County, and Livermore are coordinating on the Project to meet their General Plan’s objectives including the planned extension of Dublin Boulevard. Dublin and Livermore currently have a funding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and are exploring a new cooperative agreement with Alameda County and the Alameda CTC to continue to work together to identify the funding and timing for this mitigation. Impact TRAF-1.6: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Airway Boulevard and 6.1.l Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 35 North Canyons Parkway during the AM and PM peak hours under 2040 (cumulative) conditions. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Resulting Significance: Significant unavoidable impact to Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway. Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would improve the operation of this intersection, reducing the impact to less than significant. However, because the intersection is outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the lead agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of the Project. Rationale for Finding: With implementation of the Project, this intersection would experience significant growth to the northbound left turn and westbound through movements in the cumulative scenario. The existing lane configuration of a single shared lane for both left and through movements for the northbound approach is insufficient to handle this demand. The Project would cause the LOS to degrade from LOS E to LOS F in the AM peak hour, which is below the LOS E standard for this intersection. The PM peak hour is also impacted with the Project causing the delay for this intersection already operating at a substandard LOS to increase the average vehicle delay by 5 seconds or more. Impact TRAF-1.6 would be reduced to a less-than-significant level through the implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3, described above. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would improve the operation of this intersection to LOS C during the AM peak hour and LOS D during the PM peak hour. However, Dublin as the lead agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure, as it is outside the control and jurisdiction of the City. Therefore, this impact remains significant and unavoidable. Dublin, the County, and Livermore are coordinating on the Project to meet their General Plan’s objectives including the planned extension of Dublin Boulevard. Dublin and Livermore currently have a funding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and are exploring a new cooperative agreement with Alameda County and the Alameda CTC to continue to work together to identify the funding and timing for this mitigation. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 36 Impact TRAF-2.1: The Project would result in the northbound left turn queue at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard increasing in length by more than 25 feet (389 feet) during the AM peak hour. This turn queue already exceeds the available storage under existing conditions. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 would reduce the queue to 330 feet during the AM peak hour, allowing it to be contained within the available storage. This would be accomplished through the implementation of two left turn lanes at this approach, and moreover by increasing the capacity of the intersection to allow more vehicles to travel through efficiently. This mitigation measure would reduce this impact to less than significant. Impact TRAF-2.2: The Project would result in the southbound left turn queue at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard exceeding the available turn pocket storage by more than 25 feet (67 feet) during the PM peak hour under 2025 conditions. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Resulting Significance: Less than significant impact. Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant impact identified in the EIR. Rationale for Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 would add additional lanes in the northbound, westbound, and eastbound directions at this intersection, resulting in more capacity at the intersection. This would allow for green lights in these directions to be shorter, as the intersection would allow more vehicles to pass through in a shorter amount of time. Lane modifications included in Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 would in turn allow the southbound left turn signal to have a longer green light, allowing more vehicles time to move through the intersection. This woul d indirectly relieve the queueing impact introduced by the Project by allowing the intersections to have more throughout. The queue would be reduced to 105 feet, allowing it to be contained within the available storage and reducing this impact to less than significant. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 37 Impact TRAF-2.3: The Project would result in the westbound queue at Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway increasing by more than 25 feet (29 feet) during the PM peak hour under 2040 conditions. This turn queue already exceeds the available storage under existing conditions. Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Resulting Significance: Significant unavoidable impact to Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway. Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would improve the operation of this intersection, reducing the impact to less than significant. However, because the intersection is outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the lead agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of the Project. Rationale for Finding: With implementation of the Project, this intersection would experience significant growth in demand. The Project would cause the westbound left turn queue, which already exceeds the available turn pocket storage under existing conditions, to increase by more than 25 feet (29 feet) during the PM peak hour. The existing signal timing and lane configuration is inadequate to provide sufficient capacity to meet the demand for this movement in the 2040 Plus Project (Cumulative) scenario. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would reduce the westbound left turn queue to fit within the available turning storage. This would be accomplished by increasing the capacity of the intersection to allow more vehicles to travel through efficiently. However, Dublin as the lead agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure, as it is outside the control and jurisdiction of the City. Therefore, this impact remains significant and unavoidable. Dublin, the County, and Livermore are coordinating on the Project to meet their General Plan’s objectives including the planned extension of Dublin Boulevard. Dublin and Livermore currently have a funding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and are exploring a new cooperative agreement with Alameda County and the Alameda CTC to continue to work together to identify the funding and timing for this mitigation. Impact TRAF-2.4: The Project would result in the westbound right turn at the intersection of Isabel Avenue and I-580 Westbound off-ramps exceeding the available turn pocket storage by more than 25 feet (58 feet) during the AM peak hour under 2040 conditions. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 38 Mitigation Measure: Mitigation Measure TRAF-4: Caltrans is to optimize the traffic signal timing at Isabel Avenue and I-580 Westbound Ramps by the year 2035 to increase the green time for the westbound right turn movement. Resulting Significance: Significant unavoidable impact to the intersection of Isabel Avenue and I-580 Westbound off-ramps. Finding: Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-4 would improve the operation of this intersection, reducing the impact to less than significant. However, because the intersection is outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the lead agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted upon approval of the Project. Rationale for Finding: With implementation of the Project, increased demand from vehicles exiting the freeway to access the Project would exceed the intersection’s capacity for the westbound right turn movement. This would result in the right turn queue exceeding the available storage by 58 feet during the AM peak hour. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-4 would reduce the queue to 439 feet, allowing it to be contained within the available storage. However, this intersection is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and therefore Dublin cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure, as it is outside the control and jurisdiction of the City. Therefore, this impact remains significant and unavoidable. 6.1.l Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: 12. Exhibit C to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1 EXHIBIT D FINDINGS CONCERNING INFEASIBILITY OF ALTERNATIVES AND POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL MITIGATION MEASURES CEQA provides that decision makers should not approve a project as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures that would substantially lessen the significant impacts of the project (Public Resources Code Section 21002). The Draft EIR identified feasible mitigation measures that would reduce most of the potentially significant impacts to less than significant, as set forth in the Exhibit C Findings. However, the following impacts in the EIR may remained significant because the improvement identified in the mitigation is located outside the City of Dublin or outside of the City’s jurisdiction and the implementation of the mitigation is outside the control of the City of Dublin, the lead agency: Traffic: • Existing (2017) Plus Project Traffic Conditions: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable traffic operations at the intersection of Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway in Livermore (labeled intersection #8 in the traffic analysis) during the AM peak hour when compared to existing conditions. With implementation of the Project, this intersection would experience significant growth to the northbound left turn with the demand exceeding 800 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour. The existing lane configuration of a single shared left and through lane for the northbound approach is insufficient to handle this demand. The Project would cause the level of service (LOS) at this intersection to degrade from LOS D to LOS F in the AM peak hour. An intersection operation of LOS F would be below the LOS E standard for this intersection. This would be a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would improve the operation of this intersection to LOS D during the AM peak hour. However, because the intersection is in Livermore, outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the Lead Agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefore, this impact would be significant and unavoidable. • 2025 Plus Project Traffic Conditions: The Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway (#8) in Livermore during the AM peak hour under 2025 Plus Project conditions. As one of the primary access points for the Project, this intersection would experience significant increased demand in the northbound left turn, with the demand exceeding 800 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour. The existing lane configuration is insufficient to handle this demand. This would be a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF 3 would improve the operation of this intersection to LOS D during the AM peak hour. However, because the intersection is in Livermore, outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the Lead Agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefore, this impact would be significant and unavoidable . • Cumulative (2040 Plus Project) Traffic Conditions: The Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway in Livermore (#8) during the AM and PM peak hours under the 6.1.m Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: 13. Exhibit D to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 2 cumulative (2040 Plus Project) condition. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 would improve the operation of this intersection to LOS C during the AM peak hour and LOS D during the PM peak hour, reducing this impact to less than significant. However, because the intersection is in Livermore, outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the Lead Agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefore, this impact would be significant and unavoidable. • Cumulative (2040 Plus Project) Queuing Impact: The Project would cause the westbound queue at Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway (#8) in Livermore to extend beyond the capacity of the turn pocket by 29 feet during the PM peak hour under the cumulative (2040 Plus Project) condition. The q ueue length modeled at this intersection for 2040 No Project would exceed the available storage, and implementation of the Project would further extend the queue length. This represents a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF - 3 would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. However, because the intersection is in Livermore, outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the Lead Agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure. Therefore, this impact would be significant and unavoidable. • Cumulative (2040 Plus Project) Queuing Impact: The Project would cause the westbound right turn queue at the intersection of Isabel Avenue and I -580 Westbound off-ramps (labeled intersection #11 in the traffic analysis) to exceed the available turn pocket storage by 58 feet during the AM peak hour under cumulative conditions. This represents a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRAF-4 would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. However, this intersection is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans and outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction. Therefore, Dublin as the Lead Agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measure and this impact would be significant and unavoidable. As required by CEQA, the following findings address whether there are any feasible alternatives or any additional feasible mitigation measures available that would reduce any of these impacts to less than significant. FINDINGS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVES CEQA requires that an EIR “describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project…” (CEQA Guidelines section 15126.6(a)). If a project alternative will substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of a proposed project, the decision maker should not approve the proposed project “unless it determines that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations” make the project alternative infeasible (CEQA sections 21002 and 21081(a)(3), and CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(3)). Alternatives are identified and analyzed in Chapter 6 of the Draft EIR and include the required No Project Alternative (Alternative 1) and an Aerial Structure Alternative (Alternative 2). Each of the alternatives was assessed for each resource topic and compared to potential Project impacts. As further set forth below, the City Council 6.1.m Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: 13. Exhibit D to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 3 considered the alternatives identified and analyzed in Chapter 6 of the Draft EIR and finds them to be infeasible for specific economic, social, or other considerations pursuant to CEQA sections 21002 and 21081(a)(3), and CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(3). For CEQA purposes, “feasible” means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, technological, and legal factors. (CEQA section 21061.1, CEQA Guidelines section 15364) In addition to the Project Alternatives described below, the Draft EIR considered and rejected partial and alignment alternatives for the P roject. Partial alternatives included increased roadway capacity and modal alternatives. The Draft EIR found that the partial and alignment alternatives would not meet the objectives of the Project or avoid the Project’s significant unavoidable transportation impacts. In addition, the Draft EIR found that the partial and alignment alternatives would present conflicts with current and planned land uses, conflicts with other major projects, and would result in traffic operations and connectivity impacts. The Project objectives are set forth in Chapter 3 of the Draft EIR. CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(f)(2) states that an EIR must consider off -site alternatives if such alternatives are deemed to be feasible by the Lead Agency. If the lead agency concludes that no feasible alternative locations exist, it must disclose the reasons for this conclusion, and should include the reasons in the EIR. As the basic Project objectives include a local roadway connection between eastern Dublin and Livermore, an off-site alternative would not be feasible. Alternative 1: No Project Alternative As outlined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(3), the discussion of the No Project alternative generally proceeds along one of two lines. When revisions to an existing land use or regulatory plan are proposed, the No Project alternative should describe the continuation of the existing land use plan. For projects that would not include revisions to a land use plan, the No Project alternative would be the circumstance under which the project would not proceed. This is generally used for projects for which the No Project alternative is effectively a “no build” alternative, where disapproval of the project would maintain existing conditions on the project site. An examination of the “no build” type alternative is relevant in this case. It is infor mative to compare the Project to a No Build Alternative under which the Project site would remain as-is; effectively, a no build alternative. This allows a clear comparison between implementation of the Project and a No Project scenario. Accordingly, this section analyzes one “No Project” alternative. No disturbance or new development would occur on the Project site, thereby eliminating the potential for impacts associated with aesthetics, light, and glare; biological resources; cultural resources; geology, soils, and seismicity; hazards and hazardous materials; hydrology and water quality; noise; and public services and utilities. However, this alternative would result in impacts related to the following significance criteria: 1) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan , 2) Conflict with an 6.1.m Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: 13. Exhibit D to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 4 applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, and 3) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Additionally, in the cumulative scenario (2040), No Project Alternative 1 would result in unacceptable LOS at one intersection (Airway Boulevard/North Canyons Parkway in Livermore). Mitigation has been identified which would reduce this impact to a less-than- significant level. However, because this intersection is outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction as the Lead Agency, the timing and implementation of this mitigation measure cannot be guaranteed, and therefore the impact remains significant and unavoidable. In the cumulative scenario, No Project Alternative 1 would result in vehicle queuing impacts at the intersection of Airway Boulevard/North Canyons Parkway in Livermore. Mitigation has been identified that would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. However, for intersections in Livermore outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction as the Lead Agency, the timing and implementation of this mitigation measure cannot be guaranteed, and therefore the impact remains significant and unavoidable. No Project Alternative 1 would impede the implementation of planned transit services in eastern Dublin, and planned transit service connections between Dublin and Livermore. Similarly, No Project Alternative 1 would prevent the im plementation of planned improvements to pedestrian and bicycle connectivity in eastern Dublin and between Dublin and Livermore. Interference with implementation of multimodal and transit access and/or infrastructure results in indirect impacts to the environment through the continued prioritization of vehicle travel. As required by Senate Bill 743, evaluation of transportation impacts under CEQA should consider that in order to meet statewide GHG reduction goals, transportation must “promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses” (Public Resources Code Section 21099(b)(1). Under No Project Alternative 1, the impact related to interference with planned transit service and bicycle and pedestrian facilities would indirectly promote continued vehicle travel. It is conservatively assumed this impact would be significant and unavoidable. Based on the above and the Transportation Impact Analysis completed for the Project, No Project Alternative 1 would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to LOS, vehicle queuing, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle access. Detailed intersection level of service and queuing information can be found in Section 5.14, Transportation an d Traffic, and Appendix D of the Draft EIR. The City finds this alternative infeasible because it would not be consistent with any of the Project’s objectives. Under this alternative, the existing gap in the local roadway network between Dublin and Livermore would remain. Interconnectivity between PDAs in Dublin and Livermore would not be improved. No new transportation facilities or other public infrastructure would be implemented to support planned development in Dublin, or indirectly support implementation of Livermore’s General Plan. Local trips between Dublin and Livermore would continue to be completed via a longer-than-necessary route utilizing 6.1.m Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: 13. Exhibit D to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 5 I-580. This would continue to place demand on this segment of I-580, which is heavily congested. No multimodal access between Dublin and Livermore would be added. Based on the above, No Project Alternative 1 would not fulfill any of the Project objectives, which include: 1. Eliminate a gap in local roadway network connectivity between the cities of Dublin and Livermore, and improve interconnectivity between Dublin and Livermore priority development areas (PDAs) 2. Establish transportation facilities and other public infrastructure to serve planned development in the Dublin and Livermore General Plans, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP), and Plan Bay Area 3. Reduce demand on the local highway system by providing local access to existing and planned land uses, including residential, commercial, industrial, and business uses, and local destinations on an alternate local route that is complementary to Interstate 580 (I-580) 4. Reduce local trip lengths in Dublin and between Dublin and Livermore by diverting localized inter-city trips from I-580 5. Provide complete streets and mutimodal access between Dublin and Livermore, particularly for key public facilities such as Las Positas College, consistent with the requirements of Senate Bill (SB) 375 and regional complete streets policies o n multimodal roadways and sustainable transportation 6. Indirectly relieve congestion on I-580 by providing a completed local route on the north side of I-580 between west of Interstate 680 (I-680) in Dublin to State Route 84 (SR-84) in Livermore Finding: The City Council considered the No Project Alternative and declines to adopt it because it will not achieve any of the Project’s objectives and is infeasible for the specific economic, social, or other considerations described above, as supported by the administrative record for the Project. Alternative 2: Aerial Structure Alternative 2 was been developed to lessen impacts associated with biological resources and cultural resources. Potential impacts to biological and cultural resources would primarily result from large areas of grading required for an at -grade roadway, direct impacts to habitat areas from the permanent at -grade roadway, and indirect impacts to habitat from the placement of an at-grade roadway within a large habitat area (which would restrict the north-south movement of protected wildlife species). Alternative 2 would include an elevated roadway extension generally following the same alignment of the Project. Alternative 2 would use an aerial structure and piers similar to overpasses and roadway bridges to traverse the area between Fallon Road and Doolan Road. Alternative 2 would not connect to Croak Road. Alternative 2 would include pedestrian and bicycle facilities similar to those described for the Project. Proposed utility extensions and hydromodification controls would need to be contained within the aerial structure. 6.1.m Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: 13. Exhibit D to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 6 Alternative 2 would eliminate the gap in the local roadway network between Dublin and Livermore and would improve connectivity to PDAs in Dublin and Livermore. A lternative 2 would provide local access between Dublin and Livermore as an alternative to I -580. This would indirectly reduce demand along this congested segment of the highway. This in turn would allow for a shorter, more direct route between the two muni cipalities. Alternative 2 would provide multimodal access between Dublin and Livermore through the addition of pedestrian and bicycle access, similar to the Project. Therefore, Alternative 2 would fulfill the Project objectives of eliminating a gap in the local roadway network, improving connectivity between PDAs, indirectly reducing demand on the local highway system, reducing local trip lengths, and providing multimodal access between Dublin and Livermore. An aerial structure would provide the access des cribed above but would not provide convenient transportation or utility access to developable areas of eastern Dublin. With an aerial structure, future ground-level development along the roadway would be confronted with engineering feasibility challenges when attempting to connect to the roadway and utility lines. Alternative 2 would indirectly place limitations on how and to what extent future land uses could be accessed in eastern Dublin, as designing and constructing access points from the aerial structu re would require a larger footprint for future projects than connecting to an at-grade roadway. This would affect the amount of developable land in eastern Dublin and could result in some sites being less accessible or require the addition of secondary roadways to access developable areas. In this way, Alternative 2 would not meet the objective of establishing transportation facilities and other public infrastructure to serve planned development in eastern Dublin. Furthermore, an aerial structure unconnected to Croak Road would not support local bicycle, pedestrian, and automobile connectivity along Croak Road. Alternative 2 would result in greater impacts related to aesthetics, land use planning consistency, noise and vibration, and transportation in comparison to the project. Finding: The City Council considered the Aerial Structure Alternative and declines to adopt it because it will not avoid or substantially lessen the Project’s significant impacts, including its significant unavoidable impacts related to transportation, will not obtain most of the basic Project objectives, and is infeasible for the specific economic, social, or other considerations described above, as supported by the administrative record for the P roject. FINDINGS REGARDING INFEASIBILITY OF ADDITIONAL MITIGATION MEASURES In considering specific additional mitigation measures, the City is guided by CEQA’s legal standard to substantially lessen or avoid significant environmental effects to the extent feasible. The mitigation measures recommended in the Project EIR represent the professional judgment and experience of the City’s expert staff and environmental consultants. The City therefore believes that these recommendations should not be modified unless necessary to comply with CEQA legal standards. Thus, in considering changes or additions to the mitigation measures, the City, in determining whether to accept such modifications, either in whole or in part, has considered the following factors, among others: 1) whether the suggestion relates to a significant and unavoidable environmental effect of the Project, or instead relates to an effect that can already be mitigated to less than significant levels by mitigation measures identified in the EIR; 2) 6.1.m Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: 13. Exhibit D to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 7 whether the suggested mitigation represents a clear improvement, from an e nvironmental standpoint, over the EIR mitigation that it would replace; 3) whether the suggested mitigation is sufficiently clear as to be easily understood by those who will implement the mitigation as finally adopted; 4) whether the suggested language mi ght be too inflexible to allow for pragmatic implementation; 5) whether the suggestions are “feasible” as defined under CEQA including being able to be accomplished in a successful manner in a reasonable period of time taking into account economic, environ mental, technical, legal, social or other factors; and 6) whether the proposed mitigation is consistent with the Project objectives. The EIR found two intersections with LOS and queuing impacts that could be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through feasible mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR. However, because these intersections are outside of Dublin’s jurisdiction, Dublin as the Lead Agency cannot guarantee the implementation and timing of the mitigation measures. These impacts have been identified as significant and unavoidable. No additional mitigation measures have been identified for these impacts, as feasible mitigation measures have already been identified in the Draft EIR. These locations include: • Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway • Isabel Avenue and I-580 Westbound off-ramps 6.1.m Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: 13. Exhibit D to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 1 EXHIBIT E STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS 1. General. The Dublin Boulevard – North Canyons Parkway Extension (Project) proposes a roadway extension starting from the current terminus of Dublin Boulevard at the Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road intersection and ending at the Doolan Road/North Canyons Parkway intersection at the boundary of Alameda County (County) and Livermore. This roadway extension is also identified on a conceptual level in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The City prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) and a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Project. The EIR identified impacts that would be reduced to a less-than-significant level through mitigation. However, some traffic-related impacts would require mitigation to be implemented outside of the City’s jurisdiction. Therefore, these impacts are identified as significant and unavoidable. Significant and unavoidable Project impacts identified in the DEIR and FEIR would be reduced to a less-than-significant level through identified and feasible by mitigation measures, however, the City Council recognizes that the City cannot guarantee the implementation or timing of these mitigation measures. Therefore, the City Council recognizes that the implementation of the Project carries with it unavoidable significant environmental impacts. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15093, the City Council specifically finds that to the extent that the identified adverse or potentially adverse significant impacts for the Project have not been mitigated to acceptable levels, there are specific economic, social, environmental, land use, and other considerations that support approval of the project. 2. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts from the Dublin Boulevard – North Canyons Parkway Extension Project. The following significant unavoidable traffic impacts are associated with the Project as identified in the DEIR and FEIR. Transportation Impacts: The Project would contribute vehicle trips to the following intersections that are expected to experience unacceptable operations under Existing Plus Project (2017) Conditions, Opening Year Plus Project (2025) Conditions, and Cumulative Year Plus Project (2040) Conditions. Mitigation is proposed and would fully reduce impacts to a level of less than significant. However, the City cannot guarantee the implementation or timing of this mitigation. Therefore, the residual significance is significant and unavoidable. • Airway Boulevard/North Canyons Parkway (Livermore) • Isabel Avenue/I-580 Westbound off-ramps (Livermore) 3. Overriding Considerations. The City Council balances the Project’s unavoidable impacts identified in the DEIR and FEIR against the Project benefits, and hereby determines that such unavoidable impacts 6.1.n Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: 14. Exhibit E to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 2 are outweighed by the benefits of the Project as further set forth below. The substantial evidence supporting the various benefits can be found in the record as a whole. The project implements a roadway extension identified in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the City’s General Plan. The extension of Dublin Boulevard will ultimately improve accessibility by providing a local connection from Downtown Dublin to eastern Dublin and between Dublin and Livermore. The project would also support implementation of the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan by providing in-street and off-street bikeways, and pedestrian walkways along the extension of Dublin Boulevard. This project will close a 1.5 mile long local street gap in bicycle, pedestrian and transit network between the cities of Dublin and Livermore. It will also provide direct and enhanced connectivity to five (5) designated Priority Development Areas (PDAs) in the cities of Dublin and Livermore. It would also significantly enhance direct connectivity to two (2) BART stations; Camp Parks; Iron Horse Trail; downtowns of Dublin and Livermore; Las Positas College; and various residential and commercial land uses. The Project is included in the Alameda Countywide plans, such as; Multimodal Arterial Master Plan, Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, and Transit Plan. The completion of this project will fulfill several goals and objectives of these plans. This project improves the existing transit system by extending Dublin Boulevard that is currently serviced by LAVTA's high capacity Rapid system. The Rapid system would benefit significantly by the new extension. Therefore, direct transit access will be significantly enhanced to the planned PDAs. For these reasons, this project is included in the LAVTA's transit plan and slated to have LAVTA's Rapid service along this street to avoid the congested travel along I - 580, thus increasing the transit reliability and access. The Project will further the General Plan ’s Implementation Policy 5.2.3.B.1 of providing continuity with existing streets, including sufficient capacity for projected traffic, and allowing convenient access to planned land uses in Eastern Dublin. The project is consistent with Guiding Policy 5.4.3.A.5, which encourages projects to “work with other jurisdictions in partnering to create a truly multi-modal transportation infrastructure within and across the City." This Project provides a much-needed connection, including multi- modal options, between Dublin and Livermore. The project furthers the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan goal to “provide a circulation system for eastern Dublin that is convenient and efficient and encourages the use of alternative modes of transportation as a means of improving community character and reducing environmental impacts” (Section 5.1, p. 65). The project also furthers the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan goal for transportation, to “establish a vehicle circulation system which provides sufficient capacity for projected traffic and allows convenient access to land uses, while maintaining a neighborhood scale to the residential street system." (Section 5.2.6, p. 73). The Project helps the City achieve these goals by providing convenient access to the planned development areas included in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The project also meets Policy 5-17 to “Establish a bicycle circulation system which helps 6.1.n Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: 14. Exhibit E to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) 3 to serve the need for non-motorized transportation and recreation in eastern Dublin that is consistent with the Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan ." For all of the above reasons, the benefits of the Dublin Boulevard-North Canyons Parkway Extension Project outweigh its significant unavoidable environmental impacts. 6.1.n Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: 14. Exhibit E to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-1 Final EIR 4 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)-required component of the EIR process. As part of the CEQA environmental review procedures, Public Resources Code §21081.6 requires a public agency to adopt a monitoring and reporting program to ensure efficacy and enforceability of any mitigation measures applied to the proposed project. The lead agency must adopt an MMRP for mitigation measures incorporated into the project or proposed as conditions of approval. As stated in Public Resources Code §21081.6 (a)(1): “The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation.” Table 4-1 represents the MMRP for the Project. This table lists each of the mitigation measures proposed in the EIR, including mitigation refined or updated in the final EIR in Chapter 3, Changes to the Draft EIR, and specifies the timing and responsible party responsible for each mitigation measure. 6.1.o Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Extension) EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-2 Final EIR Table 4-1 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial Aesthetics Impact AES-1: Implementation of the Project may result in degradation of the visual quality of the scenic hills to the north. Mitigation Measure AES-1: Construction areas disturbed for equipment access and staging will be returned to their pre-Project condition. This may include minor regrading or sweeping and revegetation. Graded areas to the north of the Project site will be vegetated with an erosion control seed mix to minimize the visual change to the hillside and ensure that the graded areas blend with the surrounding natural hillside environment to the extent feasible. Submittal of documentation, site inspection Prior to Project completion City of Dublin Impact AES-2: Retaining walls implemented as a part of the Project may disrupt the visual setting, thereby degrading visual quality. Mitigation Measure AES-2: In coordination with Dublin, the County, and Livermore, retaining walls will be designed to include the following components: ▪ To reduce the visual impact of new retaining walls, aesthetic treatments consisting of color, texture and/or patterning will be applied to reduce visual impacts. The aesthetic treatment shall be context sensitive to the location. If concrete drainage ditches are required along the top of and behind the retaining walls, the ditch shall be stained to match the overall color of the wall. Aesthetic treatments will also reduce glare and deter graffiti, and shall be developed during the final design. ▪ Where required, retaining wall cable safety railing should have black or brown vinyl cladding to make them less visually obtrusive and help them blend with the setting. ▪ Concrete safety-shaped barriers should be sand blasted to a medium finish to minimize glare and Submittal of documentation Project Design City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-3 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial deter graffiti. Barriers at the bottom of retaining walls are required to be stained or are required to match the overall wall color through techniques such as staining. Impact AES-3: The Project would include trees along the roadway, introducing new vertical elements that could compromise the eligibility of I-580 as a State Scenic Highway. Mitigation Measure AES-3: All landscaping and new plantings along the Dublin Boulevard Extension must be selected and implemented to maintain the eligibility of I - 580 as a State Scenic Highway. The final selection of plantings must ensure that new planting would not substantially impede views of the landscape. Landscaping plans will be coordinated with Caltrans to ensure compatibility. Approval of Landscape Plan Prior to Project construction City of Dublin /Caltrans Impact AES-4: Project construction would include new sources of temporary night time lighting and glare, which could affect drivers traveling adjacent to the Project construction area. Mitigation Measure AES-4: Appropriate light and glare screening measures, including the use of downward cast lighting, will be used in construction, staging, and laydown areas. Submittal of documentation, on-site verification Construction City of Dublin Air Quality Impact AIR-1: Construction of the Project would result in temporary air quality impacts Mitigation Measure AQ-1: Implement the most current BAAQMD best management practices at the time of construction to control dust and exhaust. Best management practices issued by BAAQMD change over Notes on construction plans; field inspection During construction City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-4 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial related to fugitive dust. time, and may include but are not limited to: During any construction period ground disturbance, implement the following best management practices to control dust and exhaust: ▪ All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. ▪ All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. ▪ All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. ▪ All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 miles per hour. ▪ All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. ▪ Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations CCR). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. ▪ All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and 6.1.o Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-5 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Less than Significant Impact: Construction equipment emissions Mitigation Measure AQ-2: All off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet United States Environmental Protection Agency Tier 4 interim off-road emissions standards to the extent feasible. Submittal of documentation Construction City of Dublin Biological Resources Impact BIO-1.1: Project construction would result in 0.45 acres of direct and indirect temporary impacts to Congdon’s tarplant and its seedbanks, and seed banks of San Joaquin spearscale or prostrate vernal pool navarretia, if these are present within the construction footprint. Mitigation Measure BIO-1: The following measures shall be implemented to avoid and minimize impacts to special-status plant species and to the other special- status plants that have seed banks that may overlap the construction footprint: ▪ To the extent feasible, Project construction will avoid all occupied habitat for Congdon’s tarplant (which is also potential seed bank area for San Joaquin spearscale or prostrate vernal pool navarretia) plus a 50-foot buffer. ▪ The mapped areas of Congdon’s tarplant will be clearly shown on all construction plans. ▪ To avoid special-status plants, a buffer of at least 50 feet will be clearly delineated from the active work areas through installation of environmental sensitive area fencing to prevent inadvertent access. The work area for utility line removal will be bound by environmental Submittal of documentation, on-site verification by qualified plant ecologist Prior to any vegetation removal or ground- disturbing activities; during construction City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-6 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial sensitive area fencing. A qualified plant ecologist shall oversee fencing placement. ▪ Work to remove the existing utility line for relocation within the Project site will proceed using the least impactful equipment necessary to minimize crushing, soil compaction, and erosion. Mitigation Measure BIO-2: The general avoidance and minimization measures detailed in the EACCS and the associated Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) shall be implemented. Implementation of the General Minimization Measures listed in the PBO for the EACCS will further avoid impacts and are required for all EACCS-compliant projects. These avoidance and minimization measures include general measures that apply to all work, activity-specific measures designed to address anticipated effects of certain work activities or particular types of resources, and standard best management practices. Specifically, the Project would implement EACCS Measure GEN-1 through GEN-17, and PBO General Minimization Measure 1 through 19. These measures are listed in Table 5.3-3. Mitigation Measure BIO-3: To track recovery of temporarily impacted special-status plant populations, the actual area of impacts will be mapped and monitored for at least three years by a qualified plant ecologist. Prior to Project construction, an area to the south, outside the construction footprint and of a similar size and similar density of Congdon’s tarplant to the area to be impacted, will be identified and used as a reference area. Objectives during the monitoring will include removing any weed populations that may have become introduced due to disturbance, and to encourage grazing 6.1.o Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-7 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial that benefits Congdon’s tarplant. By year three, if the Congdon’s tarplant density within the impacted area is not at least 50 percent of the reference area, or if there is more than 5 percent cover of Cal-Invasive Plant Council (IPC) high or moderate ecological impact invasive plants within the recovery area (not including non-native grasses), the portion of the population impacted by the Project will be considered permanently impacted and the Project will then be required to mitigate for the impacts as per the EACCS, which would require preservation in perpetuity and management per EACCS guidelines of a similar-sized area and number of plants at a 5:1 ratio (number of new plant individuals:number of impacted plant individuals). Impact BIO-1.2: The Project could result in the direct loss and indirect disturbance of California red- legged frogs and their habitat. Mitigation Measure BIO-4: The Project will incorporate the following species-specific avoidance and minimization prescribed by the EACCS Measure AMPH-2: ▪ A qualified biologist will conduct pre- construction surveys prior to activities. If individuals are found, work will not begin until they are moved out of the construction zone to a USFWS/CDFW approved relocation site. ▪ A USFWS/CDFW-approved biologist shall be present for initial ground disturbing activities. ▪ If the work site is within the typical dispersal distance of potential breeding habitat, barrier fencing will be constructed around the worksite to prevent amphibians from entering the work area. Contact USFWS/CDFW for latest research on this distance for species of interest. Barrier fencing will be removed within 72 hours of completion of work. The Project site is known to be within dispersal distance of potential breeding habitat for California red-legged frog Submittal of documentation, qualified biologist Prior to any vegetation removal or ground- disturbing activities, during construction City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-8 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial and California tiger salamander, and therefore barrier fencing consisting of silt fence and orange construction zone fencing will be installed on the northern and southern boundaries of the Project site where construction activities border grassland habitat. The barrier fencing will be at least 3 feet high and the lower 6 inches of the fence will be buried in the ground to prevent animals from crawling under. The remaining 2.5 feet will be left above ground to serve as a barrier for animals moving on the ground surface. ▪ No monofilament plastic will be used for erosion control. ▪ Construction personnel will inspect open trenches in the morning and evening for trapped amphibians. ▪ A qualified biologist possessing a valid FESA Section 10(a)(1)(A) permit or USFWS-approved under an active biological opinion, will be contracted to trap and to move amphibians to nearby suitable habitat if amphibians are found inside a fenced area. No trapping, such as the use of upland traplines for California red-legged frogs or California tiger salamanders, is proposed for this Project. However, a biologist approved by the USFWS under the Project’s Biological Opinion and by the CDFW under the Project’s Incidental Take Permit will survey for and relocate any individuals found within the impact area. The applicant will prepare a relocation plan for the Project to be reviewed and approved by the USFWS and CDFW prior to the onset of construction. 6.1.o Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-9 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial ▪ Work within suitable habitat will be avoided from 15 October (or the first measurable fall rain of 1 inch or greater) to 1 May. Mitigation Measure BIO-5: Compensatory mitigation for the permanent direct and indirect loss of California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander habitat would be required in accordance with the measures outlined in Tables 3-7 and 3‐8 of the EACCS. Mitigation will take the form of purchase of mitigation credits from a mitigation bank or Project-specific mitigation, or other mitigation plan as approved by the USFWS and CDFW in the Project’s permits. The ratio of mitigation to impact varies with the location of the proposed mitigation, and would be 2.5:1 at minimum, but may be as high as 4:1 (acreage of new habitat:acreage of impacted habitat). Impact BIO-1.3: Project construction could result in the direct loss and indirect disturbance of California tiger salamanders and their habitat. Mitigation Measures BIO-2, BIO-4, and BIO-5 (discussed above) See Mitigation Measures BIO- 2, BIO-4, and BIO-5 above See Mitigation Measures BIO- 2, BIO-4, and BIO-5 above See Mitigation Measures BIO-2, BIO-4, and BIO-5 above Impact BIO-1.4: The Project would result in permanent and temporary impacts to foraging habitat for Mitigation Measure BIO-6: If dense stands of cattails regenerate within the proposed construction footprint prior to Project construction, the Project shall implement the following measures to avoid impacts to tricolored blackbird nesting colonies: ▪ If work is initiated within the nesting season Submittal of documentation, qualified biologist No more than 14 days prior to initial ground disturbance and vegetation removal during City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-10 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial tricolored blackbird. (i.e., February 1 to August 31), then a preconstruction survey for an active nesting colony of tricolored blackbirds shall be conducted within all perennial marsh and seasonal wetland habitats on and within 250 feet of the construction footprint. ▪ (EACCS Measure BIRD-3): If an active nest colony is identified within 250 feet of the construction footprint, work within 250 feet of the colony will be conducted outside of the nesting season (March 15 to September 1). the nesting season (February 1 to August 31) Impact BIO-1.5: Project construction may result in mortality to individual western pond turtles and their eggs. Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-4 (discussed above) Impact BIO-1.6: Project construction may result in mortality to individual San Joaquin kit foxes, should they be present within the construction footprint. Mitigation Measure BIO-7: A qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for San Joaquin kit fox and their dens prior to the start of construction activities. In the event that the species is detected during the preconstruction survey, avoidance of impacts to occupied kit fox dens will be implemented per the Standardized Recommendations for Protection of The San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior To Or During Ground Disturbance (USFWS 1999) and EACCS Measure MAMM- 1 (outlined below): ▪ If potential dens are present, their disturbance and destruction will be avoided. ▪ If potential dens are located within the construction footprint and cannot be avoided Submittal of documentation, qualified biologist Prior to the first ground- disturbing activities City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-11 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial during construction, a qualified biologist will determine if the dens are occupied or were recently occupied using methodology coordinated with the USFWS and CDFW. If unoccupied, the qualified biologist will collapse these dens by hand in accordance with USFWS procedures (USFWS 1999). ▪ Exclusion zones will be implemented following USFWS procedures (USFWS 1999) or the latest USFWS procedures available at the time. The radius of these zones will follow current standards or the following standards listed in the PBO for the EACCS: ▪ Potential Den – A total of 4-5 flagged stakes will be placed 50 feet from the den entrance to identify the den location; ▪ Known Den – Orange construction barrier fencing will be installed between the construction work area and the known den site at a minimum distance of 100 feet from the den. The fencing will be maintained until all construction-related disturbances have been terminated. At that time, all fencing will be removed to avoid attracting subsequent attention to the den; ▪ Natal or Pupping Den – The USFWS will be contacted immediately if a natal or pupping den is discovered at or within 200 feet from the boundary of the construction area. ▪ Pipes will be capped and trenches will contain exit ramps to avoid direct mortality while construction areas are active. Impact BIO-1.7: Project Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-5 (discussed Submittal of documentation, Prior to the first ground- City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-12 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial construction could result in the direct loss and indirect disturbance of burrowing owls and their habitat. above) Mitigation Measure BIO-8: A qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys for nesting burrowing owls prior to construction. As feasible, all suitable habitat within 0.5 mile of the Project site shall be surveyed for nesting burrowing owls. The survey should be conducted during the burrowing owl’s nesting season, defined by the EACCS as March 15 to September 1. This survey shall consist of two or more site visits, with the biologist examining all potential burrows within 0.5 mile, as access permits, for signs of nesting burrowing owls (i.e., owls, pellets, feathers, and/or whitewash). Should these surveys identify burrowing owls on or near the BSA, avoidance of disturbance to the burrow will be conducted per EACCS Measure BIRD-2, outlined below: ▪ If an active burrowing owl nest is identified near a proposed work area, work will be conducted outside of the nesting season (March 15 to September 1). ▪ If an active nest is identified near a proposed work area and work cannot be conducted outside of the nesting season, a qualified biologist will establish a no-activity zone. The no activity zone will be large enough to avoid nest abandonment and will at minimum be 250-foot radius from the nest. ▪ If burrowing owls are present within the construction footprint during the non-breeding period, a qualified biologist will establish a no- activity zone of at least 150 feet. ▪ If an effective no-activity zone cannot be established in either case, an experienced qualified biologist disturbing activities, during construction 6.1.o Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-13 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial burrowing owl biologist will develop a site- specific plan (i.e., a plan that considers the type and extent of the proposed activity, the duration and timing of the activity, and the sensitivity and habituation of the owls, and the dissimilarity of the proposed activity with background activities) to minimize the potential to affect the reproductive success of the owls. Mitigation Measure BIO-9: The EACCS identifies burrowing owl nesting habitat as suitable habitat within 0.5 mile of a documented nest occurrence during the previous 3 years, and it recommends compensatory mitigation in the event of any impacts to such habitat. In the event that burrowing owls are found to be nesting on or within 0.5 mile of the Project site during preconstruction surveys, or if owls need to be evicted from burrows (which can only occur when they are not actively nesting) to implement the Project, compensatory mitigation will be necessary to mitigate for impacts on occupied burrowing owl habitat. If the California red- legged frog/California tiger salamander habitat mitigation provides suitable habitat for burrowing owls as well, then no additional mitigation for impacts to burrowing owls would be necessary. Otherwise, additional habitat mitigation will be necessary, in the form of purchase of mitigation credits from a mitigation bank or Project-specific mitigation in an area that supports such habitat. The EACCS prescribes mitigation ratios of 3:1 to 3.5:1 (acreage of new habitat:acreage of impacted habitat), depending on the location of the mitigation site. Impact BIO-1.8: Mitigation Measure BIO-2 (discussed above) Submittal of Prior to the City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-14 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial The Project could result in the direct loss and indirect disturbance of American badgers and their habitat, should they be present within the construction footprint. Mitigation Measure BIO-10: A qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys for denning American badgers prior to construction. As feasible, all suitable habitat within 0.5 mile of the Project site shall be surveyed for American badgers. The survey will be conducted for the area in which the qualified biologist can access. This survey can be conducted concurrently with the burrowing owl survey outlined in Mitigation Measure BIO-8. This survey shall consist of two or more site visits, with the biologist examining all potential burrows within 0.5 mile, as access permits, for American badger dens. Should these surveys identify American badgers on or near the BSA, avoidance of disturbance to the den will be conducted per EACCS Measure MAMM-1 outlined in Mitigation Measure BIO-7. documentation, qualified biologist first ground- disturbing activities Impact BIO-1.9: Project construction would result in the loss of foraging habitat and prey habitat for bats, and could temporarily alter foraging patterns in the immediate vicinity. Additionally, Project construction could indirectly result in mortality of bats and their young, if present within the Mitigation Measure BIO-2 (discussed above) Mitigation Measure BIO-11: A qualified bat biologist will conduct a pre-construction/pre-demolition survey for roosting bats within 15 days prior to the commencement of construction activities within 400 feet of trees or buildings providing potential roosting habitat . The survey will focus on detecting bats that may be day- roosting in trees within or immediately adjacent to (i.e., within 100 feet of) the impact areas. If suitable roost sites are found and a visual survey is not adequate to determine presence or absence of bats, acoustical equipment will be used to determine occupancy. If no evidence of bat roosts is found, any buildings or trees that contain potential roosting sites and are proposed for removal will be removed within 15 days following completion of the survey. Submittal of documentation, qualified biologist No more than 15 days prior to commencement of construction activities, during construction City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-15 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial construction footprint. If a day roost is found during the maternity season (1 April until the young are flying, typically by 31 August) within 400 feet of the impact areas, a qualified bat biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the width of a buffer that will be established around the roost. No construction-related activity shall occur within the buffer during the maternity season. Typical buffers recommended between intense construction activity and pallid bat roosts are: 90 feet for motor vehicles and foot traffic, 120 feet for heavy equipment, 150 feet for trenching, 250 feet for idling equipment or generators, 250 feet for shielded lighting, and 400 feet for unshielded lighting. No tree or structure containing a maternity roost will be removed or otherwise physically disturbed during the maternity season. Outside the maternity season, a day roost may be removed after individual bats are safely evicted under the direction of a qualified bat biologist. Eviction will occur between 1 September and 31 March, but will not occur during long periods of inclement or cold weather (as determined by the bat biologist) when prey are not available or bats are in torpor. If feasible, one-way doors will be used to evict bats. If use of a one-way door is not feasible, or the exact location of the roost entrance is not known, the roosts that need to be removed shall first be disturbed by the bat biologist. Such disturbance will occur at dusk to allow bats to escape during the darker hours. These buildings or trees shall then be removed the following day. All of these activities will be performed under the supervision of the bat biologist. Mitigation Measure BIO-12: Compensatory mitigation for impacts on active bat roosts would not be warranted unless a maternity roost of pallid bats or Townsend’s 6.1.o Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-16 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial big-eared bats will be lost. In this instance, the provision of one or more alternate roost structures would be appropriate to reduce impacts on special-status bat species. If a pallid bat or Townsend’s big-eared bat day roost is located within a tree or building to be removed, an alternative bat roost structure will be provided by the City of Dublin and its partners. The design and placement of this structure will be determined by a bat biologist, in consultation with the CDFW, based on the location of the original roost and the habitat conditions in the vicinity. The roost structure will be built to specifications as determined by a bat biologist and CDFW, or it may be purchased from an appropriate vendor. The structure will be placed as close to the impacted roost site as feasible. This bat structure will be erected at least one month prior to removal of the original roost structure. A bat biologist will monitor this structure during the breeding season for up to two years following completion of the Project, or until it is found to be occupied by bats (whichever occurs first), to provide information for future projects regarding the effectiveness of such structures in minimizing impacts to bats. Impact BIO-1.10: Project construction could result in take of a special-status individual bird, egg, or nest, should an individual be foraging or nesting within the construction Mitigation Measure BIO-2 (discussed above) Mitigation Measure BIO-13: Project implementation shall include the following measures to comply with the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code and avoid death or injury of special-status birds or their active nests, eggs, or young. ▪ Avoidance of the Nesting Bird Season. If feasible, Project activities will be scheduled to avoid the avian nesting season. If such activities are Submittal of documentation, qualified biologist No more than 14 days prior to initial ground disturbance and vegetation removal during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31), during City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-17 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial footprint during construction. scheduled to take place outside the nesting season, all impacts on nesting birds, including raptors, protected under the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code, would be avoided. The nesting season for most birds in Alameda County typically extends from February 1 through August 31, although in most years, a majority of birds have finished nesting by August 1. ▪ Vegetation Removal during the Non-Nesting Season. If Project activities will not be initiated until after the start of the nesting season, potential nesting substrate (e.g., bushes, trees, grasses, and other vegetation) that is scheduled to be removed may be removed prior to the start of the nesting season (e.g., prior to 1 February) to reduce the potential for initiation of nests. If it is not feasible to schedule vegetation removal during the nonbreeding season, or where vegetation cannot be removed (e.g., in areas immediately adjacent to the site), then pre- construction surveys for nesting birds will be conducted as described below. Sensitive and/or regulated wetland vegetation would not be removed prior to construction, if feasible. ▪ Pre-construction/Pre-disturbance Surveys for Nesting Birds. If it is not possible to schedule Project activities between September 1 and February 1, then a qualified biologist will conduct pre-construction surveys for nesting birds to ensure that no nests will be disturbed during Project implementation. These surveys will be conducted no more than one week prior to the initiation of Project activities. During this construction 6.1.o Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-18 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial survey, a qualified biologist will inspect all potential nesting habitats (e.g., trees, shrubs, grasslands, and structures) within 300 feet of impact areas for raptor nests and within 100 feet of impact areas for nests of non-raptors. Surveys for burrowing owls and nesting golden eagles will extend out to 0.5 mile from the Project site (to the extent that such areas are accessible) ▪ Buffers around Active Nests. If an active nest (i.e., a nest with eggs or young, or any completed raptor nest attended by adults) is found sufficiently close to the construction footprint to be disturbed by these activities, the biologist, in consultation with CDFW, will determine the extent of a disturbance-free buffer zone to be established around the nest to ensure that no nests of species protected by the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code will be disturbed during Project implementation. Typical buffers are 0.25 mile (or 0.5-mile line-of-sight) for golden eagles, 250 feet for burrowing owls, 300 feet for other raptors, and 50-100 feet for non- raptors. Because the majority of the site is already subject to disturbance by vehicles and pedestrians, activities that will be prohibited from occurring within the buffer zone around a nest will be determined on a case-by-case basis by a qualified biologist. In general, activities prohibited within such a buffer while a nest is active will be limited to new construction- related activities (i.e., activities that were not ongoing when the nest was constructed) involving significantly greater noise, human 6.1.o Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-19 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial presence, or vibrations than were present prior to nest initiation. ▪ Nest Deterrence. If necessary to avoid impacts to active nests, nest starts may be removed on a regular basis (e.g., every second or third day), starting in late January or early February to prevent active nests from becoming established. Impact BIO-1.11: Project construction could result in impacts to migratory bird species, their eggs, or nests, should an individual be foraging or nesting within the construction footprint during construction. Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-13 (discussed above) See Mitigation Measures BIO- 2 and BIO-13 above See Mitigation Measures BIO- 2 and BIO-13 above See Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-13 above Impact BIO-2: The Project may adversely affect riparian habitat and other sensitive natural communities at the Project site, through temporary disturbance during construction and permanent loss of natural areas through conversion Mitigation Measures BIO-5 (discussed above) Mitigation Measure BIO-14: Project implementation shall include the following measures to reduce riparian habitat impacts: ▪ All riparian areas and riparian trees to be preserved will be clearly depicted on final Project plans. Areas to be avoided shall be indicated and protected at the site using orange sensitive area fencing to ensure inadvertent impacts do not occur. ▪ No equipment will be staged or refueled in the riparian areas along Cottonwood Creek. Submittal of documentation, qualified arborist Prior to any ground- disturbing activity on the site, during construction City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-20 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial to a multi-modal roadway. ▪ All appropriate AMMs listed in the EACCS that would apply to and protect these riparian habitats will be enacted. Mitigation Measure BIO-15: The valley oak tree to be avoided during implementation of the Project will be protected with a tree protection zone, developed under the consultation of a qualified, International Society of Arborists-certified arborist. This tree protection zone may be larger than the drip line of the tree, as determined by the qualified arborist, and will be delineated with orange construction fencing. No fill placement, equipment access, or materials stockpiling may occur within the tree protection zone, unless approved by the qualified arborist (for example for crown trimming, if needed). Mitigation Measure BIO-16: The permanent loss of riparian habitat types shall be mitigated consistent with requirements for species mitigation set by the EACCS. Mitigation will be provided via permanent preservation, enhancement or creation, and management as per EACCS guidelines, or through purchase of credits in an approved riparian mitigation bank. Because all riparian habitats in the construction footprint provide habitat for focal species, the mitigation ratio for the impacts will be at least 2.5:1 (acreage of new or enhanced habitat: acreage of impacted habitat). Because the wetland and stream habitats all provide dispersal and foraging habitat for California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander, the final mitigation ratio must be as high as 6.1.o Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-21 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial the determined EACCS requirements for focal species. Mitigation ratios will vary based on the location and quality of the mitigation lands, which have not been selected yet. Mitigation must be in-kind for mixed riparian woodland impacts, but riparian grassland impacts may be mitigated with either grassy or wooded riparian habitat. Prior to impacting these habitats, the Project will prepare a Riparian Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (RMMP) that will describe the mitigation site, enhancement or creation actions that will be enacted, prescribe planting palettes using native species, and provide a monitoring and reporting program and schedule for implementation. The RMMP must also identify success criteria, including less than 5 percent cover of California Invasive Plant Council (Cal - IPC)-rated high impact weeds by year 5, and at least 50 percent canopy cover of native woody riparian species in areas providing compensation for mixed riparian woodland impacts by year 10. Temporary impacts to riparian habitat shall be restored in place at a 1:1 ratio through re-establishment of original contours along banks, decompaction of compacted soils where necessary, and seeding with a native seed mix developed by a qualified restoration ecologist and containing species such as alkali barley (Hordeum depressum), meadow barley (Hordeum brachyantherum), purple needlegrass (Stipa purpurea), and/or other native grass and forb species that occur in the Project vicinity. Temporary impact areas will be monitored for 2 years and the criteria for success will be 75 percent vegetation cover or more compared to pre- Project conditions and no more than 5 percent cover of Cal-IPC-rated moderate and high impact weed species (excluding Cal-IPC-rated annual grasses). 6.1.o Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-22 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial Impact BIO-3: The Project may adversely affect protected wetlands through temporary placement of construction equipment, construction access, grading, placement of Project fill material, and permanent roadway improvements. Mitigation Measure BIO-18: The permanent loss of waters and wetlands shall be mitigated consistent with requirements for species mitigation from the EACCS. Mitigation will be provided via preservation, enhancement, and management as per EACCS guidelines. This may be purchased as bank credits or managed as a Project-specific mitigation site. Because all wetland and stream habitats in the Project site provide habitat for focal species, the mitigation ratio for the impacts will be at least 2.5:1 (acreage of new or enhanced habitat: acreage of impacted habitat). Because the wetland and stream habitats all provide dispersal and foraging habitat for California red-legged frog and California tiger salamander, the final mitigation ratio must be as high as the determined EACCS requirements for focal species. The required mitigation ratio will vary based on the location and quality of the mitigation lands, which have not been selected yet. Additionally, compensatory mitigation for wetlands and waters must be provided in- kind (wetlands for wetlands and streams for streams). Prior to impacting these habitats, if bank credits will not be used to compensate for wetland impacts, the Project will prepare a Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (WMMP, which may be a combined document with the RMMP referenced in Mitigation Measure BIO-16) that will describe the mitigation site, enhancement or creation actions that will be enacted, prescribe planting palettes using native species, and provide a monitoring and reporting program and schedule for implementation. The WMMP must also identify success criteria, including less than 5 percent cover of Cal-IPC-rated high impact weeds in created or enhanced wetlands by year 5, and indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, and indicators and/or direct observation of hydric soil development Submittal of documentation Prior to any ground- disturbing activity on the site City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-23 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial and wetland hydrology in created wetlands by year 5. Temporary impacts to these waters and wetlands will be restored in place at a 1:1 ratio through re-establishment of original contours in stream channels and wetlands, decompaction of compacted soils where necessary, and seeding with a native wetland seed mix developed by a qualified restoration ecologist containing species such as alkali barley and Mexican rush. Temporary impact areas will be monitored for 2 years and the criteria for success will be 75 percent vegetation cover or more compared to pre-Project conditions and no more than 5 percent cover of Cal-IPC-rated moderate and high impact weed species (excluding Cal-IPC-rated annual grasses). Impact BIO-4: The Project may interfere with species migration through segmentation of habitat within the BSA and disruption of nesting birds during Project construction. Mitigation Measures BIO-5 and BIO-13 (described above) Mitigation Measures BIO- 5 and BIO-13 (described above) Mitigation Measures BIO- 5 and BIO-13 (described above) Mitigation Measures BIO-5 and BIO-13 (described above) Impact BIO-5: Without proper mitigation implementing the East Alameda County Conservation Strategy, the Project could conflict with Mitigation Measures BIO-2 through BIO-10, BIO-14, BIO-16, BIO-17, and BIO-18 (described above) Mitigation Measures BIO- 2 through BIO- 10, BIO-14, BIO-16, BIO- 17, and BIO-18 (described above) Mitigation Measures BIO- 2 through BIO- 10, BIO-14, BIO-16, BIO- 17, and BIO-18 (described above) Mitigation Measures BIO-2 through BIO- 10, BIO-14, BIO-16, BIO- 17, and BIO- 18 (described above) 6.1.o Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-24 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial the goals, objectives, and mitigation criteria contained in that strategy. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Impact CUL-1: The Project could result in damage to or destruction of the historic-period archeological resource identified within the construction footprint (Corral Site), as a result of grading and excavation during construction. Mitigation Measure CUL-1: The following measures shall be implemented prior to construction of the Project, and during construction of the Project, to ensure known and potential historic-period archeological resources at the Corral Site are properly documented and/or collected: ▪ Prior to construction, surface remnants will be documented by a professionally qualified archaeologist with appropriate qualifications in historic-period archaeology. Surface remnants may be collected for further study, at the discretion of the archaeologist. ▪ Prior to construction, recommendations for subsurface investigation outlined in the Archeological Survey Report prepared for the Project shall be implemented. A subsurface testing plan shall be prepared and executed by a professionally qualified archeologist with appropriate qualifications in historic-period archeology. The plan shall allow for, and outline requirements for, the documentation, collection, analysis, and curation of historic artifacts encountered during subsurface testing. ▪ The report shall outline any further Submittal of documentation, qualified archeologist Prior to construction City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-25 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial recommendations for the site, which may include additional site testing, construction protocols to avoid the destruction of resources on-site through documentation and collection, or other measures. The City of Dublin shall evaluate recommendations of this report and implement measures as feasible to further aid in resource documentation and collection at the site. ▪ In addition to measures provided in the written report, a professionally qualified historic archeologist shall be present on-site when construction activities take place within the resource area. The need for on-site monitoring on a day-to-day basis shall be at the discretion of the historic archeologist. If artifacts or other historic archeological resources associated with the site are encountered during construction, work shall be halted within 25 feet of the discovery until the historic archeologist has evaluated the discovery. The historic archeologist shall determine whether the artifacts and/or resources are significant and warrant documentation and/or recovery, or whether they are not significant and no further action is warranted. ▪ Any significant artifacts or other historic archeological resources encountered during construction shall be documented, collected, analyzed, and/or curated as appropriate so that their informational, research, and/or scientific value may be preserved. The appropriate treatment of artifacts and historic archeological resources encountered shall be determined by 6.1.o Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-26 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial the professionally qualified historic archeologist. ▪ The results of surface resource documentation and subsurface testing shall be documented in a written report prepared by the qualified historic archaeologist and submitted to the City of Dublin. Impact CUL-2: The Project could result in damage to or destruction of unidentified buried archeological resources as a result of grading and excavation during construction. Mitigation Measure CUL-2: If buried archaeological resources are discovered during construction, operations shall stop within 50 feet of the find and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to evaluate the resource in accordance with CEQA Guidelines 15064.5. Archeological resources may include, but are not limited to, glass, metal, ceramics, wood, privies, trash deposits or similar debris. A standard inadvertent discovery clause shall be included in the construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. If after evaluation it is determined the resource does not qualify as a significant resource, then no further protection or study is necessary. If the resource does qualify as a significant resource then the archaeologist shall make recommendations concerning appropriate mitigation measures that shall be implemented to protect the resources, including but not limited to monitoring, excavation, and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Submittal of documentation, qualified archeologist Prior to construction, continuation after discovery of archaeological resources City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-27 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial Impact CUL-3: The Project could result in damage to or destruction of unidentified buried archeological resources as a result of grading and excavation during construction. Mitigation Measure CUL-3: The following measures will ensure that any paleontological resources encountered during Project construction would be properly handled, evaluated, and curated to ensure their value to paleontological research is preserved. ▪ A principal paleontologist shall be retained and shall determine when and where monitoring will be required, and who will conduct it. Monitoring shall be required where excavation at depths greater than 2 to 3 feet is being undertaken. The principal paleontologist shall have the authority to halt work in the event that paleontological specimens are discovered, until assessment and appropriate salvage (if needed) is completed. ▪ The principal paleontologist or another mitigation program staff member shall coordinate with appropriate construction contractor personnel to provide information regarding applicable requirements concerning protecting paleontological resources. Contractor personnel, particularly heavy equipment operators, shall also be briefed on procedures to be followed in the event that fossil remains and/or a currently unrecorded fossil site is encountered by earthmoving activities, particularly if a paleontological construction monitor is not present on the site at the time of the discovery. Additional briefing shall be presented to new contractor personnel as necessary. Names and telephone numbers of the monitor and other appropriate mitigation program personnel shall be provided to appropriate contractor personnel. Submittal of documentation, qualified paleontologist Prior to construction, continuation after discovery of paleontological resources City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-28 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial ▪ When required, monitoring shall consist of visually inspecting freshly exposed cuts and spoil piles for the discovery and recovery of larger fossil remains, and periodically dry test screening to allow for the discovery and recovery of smaller fossil remains. If larger vertebrate fossils are noted by construction workers or monitors, excavation there will cease, and the monitor will be notified. ▪ The monitor and recovery staff will salvage all larger vertebrate fossil remains, as soon as practicable and as quickly as possible, following Society of Vertebrate Paleontology protocols. The monitor shall document the location and proper geologic context of any recovered fossil occurrence or rock or sediment samples. Any recovered rock or sediment sample shall be processed to allow for the recovery of smaller fossil remains that normally are too small to be observed by the monitor. ▪ If the principal paleontologist or monitor determines that the fossil site is too unproductive or the fossil remains not worthy of recovery by the monitor, no further action will be taken to preserve the fossil site or remains, and earthmoving activities shall be allowed to proceed through the site immediately. ▪ The monitor shall maintain daily monitoring logs that include the particular tasks accomplished, the earthmoving activity monitored, the location where monitoring was conducted, the rock unit(s) encountered, the fossil specimens recovered, and associated specimen data and corresponding geologic and 6.1.o Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-29 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial geographic site data. A final technical report of results and findings shall be prepared by the principal paleontologist in accordance with any local jurisdictional requirements (including those of the City of Dublin, Alameda County, and City of Livermore as appropriate) and archived at a repository mutually approved by the jurisdiction and principal paleontologist. ▪ Consistent with Federal and State law, if fossils are discovered during grading, the principal paleontologist must be called to the site to develop a mitigation plan to protect those resources. ▪ All fossil specimens recovered as a result of mitigation, including those recovered as the result of processing rock or sediment samples, will be treated (i.e., prepared, identified, curated, catalogued) in accordance with designated museum repository requirements. Rock or sediment samples will be submitted to commercial laboratories for microfossil, pollen, radiometric dating, or other analysis, as appropriate. The Project site lies in Alameda County. If paleontological specimens are encountered and collected at the site during mitigation, they become property of the County and should be properly curated at an approved facility (local to the Project location or a museum) and preserved for future research. Impact CUL-4: The Project could result in damage to or destruction of unidentified buried Mitigation Measure CUL-4: The following measures shall be implemented to ensure that any tribal cultural objects or items encountered during Project construction are properly identified and evaluated, and avoided or preserved. Submittal of documentation, culturally- affiliated Native Prior to construction, continuation after discovery of tribal City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-30 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial tribal cultural resources as a result of grading and excavation during construction. ▪ A culturally-affiliated Native American with knowledge of cultural resources shall be identified and agreed upon by the City of Dublin and local tribes listed by the NAHC and shall be present to monitor all ground-disturbing activities. ▪ If tribal cultural objects or items are encountered, the treatment of those objects or items shall be considered in coordination with culturally-affiliated Native Americans. If avoidance or preservation in place is preferred, avoidance or preservation in place will be completed where feasible and agreed upon by culturally-affiliated Native Americans and the local jurisdiction. ▪ Tribal cultural objects or items encountered during Project construction shall be treated with culturally appropriate dignity, taking into account the tribal cultural values and meaning of the resource. ▪ The disposition of recovered tribal cultural items that are not burial-associated shall be coordinated in consultation with culturally- affiliated Native Americans. American with knowledge of cultural resources cultural resources Geology and Soils Impact GEO-1: People and structures may be exposed to risks associated with slope stability, liquefaction, and seismically-induced Mitigation Measure GEO-1: As part of the final design phase, preparation of a design-level geotechnical and geologic report will be required and will include subsurface field work and laboratory testing. Site specific subsurface soil conditions and slope stabilities within the Project site will be verified during the preparation of this report to determine the appropriate final design for the Project. Recommendations from the design-level report Submittal of documentation Final Design Phase City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-31 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial settlement at or near Project site. will be incorporated into the Project design. Future subsurface exploration will include soil borings at approximate 500-foot intervals along the roadway extension. Soil borings will determine the geologic stability of soils underlying the Project site. In addition, borings will specifically be performed for cut slopes over 8 feet, at retaining wall locations, at bridge support locations, and at culvert crossing locations. Additional borings may be necessary for other Project components, at the discretion of the City of Dublin or the Responsible Agency in their jurisdiction and on the recommendation of professionally qualified specialists. The field investigation will consider Project design details to provide design recommendations. Key considerations shall include the following: ▪ Liquefaction. The design-level geotechnical report shall evaluate liquefaction potential at the Cottonwood Creek crossing to determine the need for foundation elements deeper than those required for structural loading purposes. ▪ Slope Stability. The Project would include cuts and fills throughout the Project site. Cut/fill slopes will be addressed in the design-level geotechnical report to evaluate the need for selective grading provisions to mitigate the potential for clayey materials in fill slopes, which could create slope stability issues. Selective grading provisions, if necessary, will avoid this risk. In addition, the design-level geotechnical report will also evaluate the suitability of existing soils for re-use as fill material. If soils are not suitable to use as fill material, imported fill will be used where needed to ensure stability. 6.1.o Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-32 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial ▪ Corrosive Soils. The design-level geotechnical report will investigate for the presence of corrosive soils within the Project site. If corrosive soils are identified at locations where new subsurface facilities are proposed (e.g. bridge foundations, culverts, etc.) specially coated rebar, or alternative pipe culverts will be specified in the contract documents. ▪ Expansive Soils. The design-level geotechnical report will investigate for the presence of expansive soils within the Project site. Depending on the extent of expansive soils and level of expansion potential, supplemental design measures such as lime-treatment, selective grading, or select import fill materials may be necessary. ▪ Erosion Potential. The design-level geotechnical report will characterize the risk of increased erosion as a result of topography, soil characteristics, and Project design. Impact GEO-2: The Project may result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil during construction. Mitigation Measure GEO-1 (described above) Mitigation Measure GEO- 1 (described above) Mitigation Measure GEO- 1 (described above) Mitigation Measure GEO-1 (described above) Impact GEO-3: With implementation of the Project, roadway users and the new Cottonwood Creek Mitigation Measure GEO-1 (described above) Mitigation Measure GEO- 1 (described above) Mitigation Measure GEO- 1 (described above) Mitigation Measure GEO-1 (described above) 6.1.o Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-33 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial bridge may be exposed to risks associated with corrosive, expansive, or other unsuitable soils. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-1: Project construction could expose construction workers and future users to soil contamination from past uses of the Project site and surrounding areas, including pesticides and/or petrochemicals from fuel. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: If petroleum-impacted soils or USTs are unexpectedly encountered during any construction activities, work in the area shall be temporarily halted and the corresponding jurisdiction (City of Dublin, the County, or Livermore) shall coordinate with the ACDEH to determine appropriate treatment and removal of the UST and contaminated soil. Mitigation Measure HAZ-2: Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading, or building permit, a limited soil investigation will be completed within the construction area to identify potential contamination from past petroleum hydrocarbons and any agrichemical contamination from agricultural use. ▪ Soil samples will be collected and tested for residual pesticides by a qualified professional. Concentrations of agricultural contaminants will be compared to applicable State Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels. ▪ Dublin shall prepare and submit a comprehensive report to the ACDEH, signed by a qualified environmental professional, documenting the presence or lack of petroleum hydrocarbons, agrichemicals, or other contaminants on the Project site. Submittal of documentation Prior to construction, during construction City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-34 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial ▪ If the soil investigation finds contaminants are present, Dublin, in cooperation with the County if needed, shall create and implement a remediation plan that ensures workers and future users of the Project are not exposed to concentrations in excess of screening levels or other risks associated with soil contamination in accordance with regulatory standards. ▪ Potential safety measures could include soil removal and treatment, or protective work attire requirements for construction workers. ▪ The remediation plan shall also include provisions to outline safe transportation and disposal techniques, and would prevent the handling of hazardous materials1 nearby sensitive educational facilities by delimiting work areas and hauling routes within 0.25 mile of a school. Impact HAZ-2: Project construction could require transportation of contaminated soils within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, if contaminated soils are found and removed from the Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure HAZ- 2 (described above) Mitigation Measure HAZ- 2 (described above) Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 (described above) 1 In this context, hazardous materials include a hazardous substance (as defined in California Public Resources Code Section 21151.4) or a mixture containing extremely hazardous substances in a quantity equal to or greater than the state threshold specified pursuant to su bdivision (j) of Section 25532 of the Health and Safety Code. 6.1.o Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-35 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial construction footprint. Noise and Vibration Impact NOI-1: The Project would result in temporary noise increases during construction, which could exceed local standards. Mitigation Measure NOI-1: The following measures will be implemented during Project construction. ▪ The Project contractor shall submit a Construction Noise Management Program that identifies measures proposed to minimize construction noise impacts on existing residents. ▪ All construction equipment will conform to Section 14-8.02, Noise Control, of the latest Standard Specifications. ▪ In Dublin, all construction operations shall comply with local noise standards and be limited to normal daylight hours where feasible. All stationary equipment shall be adequately muffled and located away from sensitive receptors. The construction contractor shall limit all on-site noise-producing construction activities, including deliveries and warming up of equipment, to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., daily, where feasible. If work is necessary outside of these hours, the contractor shall acquire appropriate permits from the local jurisdiction and implement a construction noise monitoring program, providing additional mitigation where practical and feasible. ▪ In the County and Livermore, construction activities generating excessive noise will be limited to the hours specified in the appropriate local ordinance, where feasible. If work is necessary outside of these hours, the contractor shall acquire appropriate permits from the local Notes on plans; site inspection During construction City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-36 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial jurisdiction and implement a construction noise monitoring program, providing additional mitigation where practical and feasible. ▪ Pile driving activities in all jurisdictions will be limited to daytime hours only, when feasible. If pile driving outside of typical construction hours specified in this measure is required, the contractor shall acquire appropriate permits from the local jurisdiction and implement a construction noise monitoring program, providing additional mitigation where practical and feasible. ▪ Equip all internal combustion-engine driven equipment with manufacturer recommended intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment. ▪ Locate stationary noise generating equipment and self-powered lighting systems as far as possible from sensitive receptors when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near the construction footprint ▪ Utilize "quiet" air compressors and other "quiet" equipment where such technology exists. ▪ Prohibit unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines within 100 feet of residences. ▪ Avoid staging of construction equipment within 200 feet of noise-sensitive uses. ▪ The construction contractor shall designate a noise disturbance coordinator who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the disturbance coordinator shall notify Dublin within 24 hours 6.1.o Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-37 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial of the complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem, as deemed acceptable by the City of Dublin Community Development Department. The construction contractor shall conspicuously post the contact name and telephone number for the noise disturbance coordinator at the construction site. Impact NOI-2: Project construction activities could result in substantial temporary and periodic noise increases as a result of construction equipment operation and construction activities in the vicinity of sensitive receptors. Mitigation Measure NOI-1 (described above) Mitigation Measure NOI- 1 (described above) Mitigation Measure NOI- 1 (described above) Mitigation Measure NOI-1 (described above) Public Services Impact SERV-1: Project construction could temporarily result in interference with emergency services access as a result of construction work Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 (described below) Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 (described below) Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 (described below) Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 (described below) 6.1.o Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-38 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial at the intersections of Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road and Doolan Road/North Canyons Parkway. Transportation and Traffic Impact TRAF-1.1: Project construction would result in a temporary increase in construction truck trips on local streets designated as truck routes and construction vehicle trips to and from the Project site. Project construction could require temporary closure of the Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road intersection and the Doolan Road/North Canyons Parkway intersection, and temporary closure of Croak Road while a new intersection Mitigation Measure TRAF-1: A TMP shall be prepared during the design phase for the Project, in accordance with all local requirements. The TMP should address traffic impacts from staged construction, detours, and specific traffic handling concerns during construction of the Project, including multi-modal access. The objective of the TMP is to minimize the impacts that construction activities would have on the traveling public. Traffic management strategies that require action by the construction contractor should be presented in detail in the technical specifications of the bid contract, and should be considered part of the Project. In implementing the TMP, each jurisdiction should produce and disseminate press releases and other documents, as necessary, to adequately notify and inform motorists, pedestrians and cyclists, business community groups, local entities, emergency services, and elected officials of upcoming road closures and detours. This responsibility includes advance notification to local newspapers, television and radio stations, and emergency response providers. If agreed upon by Dublin, the County, and Livermore, Dublin as the lead ag ency may lead preparation and implementation of the TMP. Submittal of documentation Prior to completion of Design Phase City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-39 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial is constructed, necessitating detours. Construction truck, equipment, and vehicle trips, and intersection closures and detours could result in temporary congestion at local intersections in Dublin and Livermore. Impact TRAF-1.2: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard during the AM peak hour over existing conditions. Mitigation Measure TRAF-2: Dublin is to implement the following geometric and signal timing improvements at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road prior to the opening of the Dublin Boulevard Extension: ▪ Implement the mitigation measures described in the Kaiser Environmental Impact Report (EIR) which includes the construction of an additional left turn lane for both the northbound and eastbound approaches. This improvement is the obligation of Kaiser and the City shall build and seek reimbursement from Kaiser if not built by the time the Dublin Boulevard – North Canyons Parkway Extension Project is built. ▪ In addition to the mitigations proposed for the Kaiser EIR, Dublin shall implement the following improvements: ▪ Northbound – construct at least one northbound right turn lane resulting in the following final lane configuration: 2 left turns, 2 through, and Submittal of documentation Prior to project completion City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-40 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial one right turn lane ▪ Eastbound – construct at least one more through lane resulting in the following final lane configuration: 2 left turns, 2 through, and 2 rights ▪ Westbound – construct at least two additional through lanes resulting in the following lane configuration: 1 left turn, 2 through, and a shared through/right ▪ Optimize the signal timing Impact TRAF-1.3: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway in Livermore during the AM peak hour over existing conditions. Mitigation Measure TRAF-3: The City of Livermore is to implement the following geometric and signal timing improvements at the intersection of Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway prior to Project completion: ▪ Shift the median of Airway Boulevard one lane to the west reducing the southbound lanes from three to two and increasing the northbound lanes from three to four ▪ With the extra northbound lane, convert the northbound approach to Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway to have an exclusive left, shared left/through, and two right turn lanes ▪ Add an additional westbound through lane resulting in two left turns, one exclusive through, and a shared through/right ▪ Optimize the signal timing Submittal of documentation Prior to project completion City of Dublin Impact TRAF-1.4: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) 6.1.o Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-41 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial unacceptable operations at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard during both the AM and PM peak hours under 2025 conditions. Impact TRAF-1.5: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway during the AM peak hour under 2025 conditions. Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Impact TRAF-1.6: The change in travel patterns resulting from the Project would result in unacceptable operations at the intersection of Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) 6.1.o Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-42 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway during the AM and PM peak hours under 2040 (cumulative) conditions. Impact TRAF-2.1: The Project would result in the northbound left turn queue at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard increasing in length by more than 25 feet (389 feet) during the AM peak hour. This turn queue already exceeds the available storage under existing conditions. Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Impact TRAF-2.2: The Project would result in the southbound left turn queue at the intersection of Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-2 (described above) 6.1.o Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-43 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial exceeding the available turn pocket storage by more than 25 feet (67 feet) during the PM peak hour under 2025 conditions. Impact TRAF-2.3: The Project would result in the westbound queue at Airway Boulevard and North Canyons Parkway increasing by more than 25 feet (29 feet) during the PM peak hour under 2040 conditions. This turn queue already exceeds the available storage under existing conditions. Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Mitigation Measure TRAF-3 (described above) Impact TRAF-2.4: The Project would result in the westbound right turn at the intersection of Isabel Avenue and Mitigation Measure TRAF-4: Caltrans is to optimize the traffic signal timing at Isabel Avenue and I-580 Westbound Ramps by the year 2035 to increase the green time for the westbound right turn movement. Submittal of documentation Prior to project completion City of Dublin 6.1.o Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin EXHIBIT F Chapter 4 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Dublin Boulevard – N. Canyons Parkway Extension Project 4-44 Final EIR Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial I-580 Westbound off-ramps exceeding the available turn pocket storage by more than 25 feet (58 feet) during the AM peak hour under 2040 conditions. 6.1.o Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: 15. Exhibit F to Attachment 9 (Amend GP and EDSP and create precise ROW for Dublin Page 1 of 3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: August 20, 2019 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager SUBJECT: Discussion on the City of Dublin's Sister City Activities Prepared by: Suzanne Iarla, Managemen t Analyst II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider providing a one-time contribution to the Dublin Sister City Association in support of the Green & White Gala event in 2020, consider the Mayor traveling to Ireland at the invitation of the W icklow County Council, and receive a report on the City's participation in Sister Cities International. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1) Receive a brief presentation from the Dublin Sister City Association ("DSCA" or "Association"); 2) Discuss and consider a one-time only contribution to DSCA of $5,000 towards the Green & White Gala in March, 2020 ; 3) Discuss and consider the Mayor traveling to Bray, Ireland in 2019 to participate in a planning meeting to discuss a visit by a City of Dublin delegation to Bray, Ireland in 2020; and, 4) Receive a report on the City's participation in Sister Cities International. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Neither a contribution to support the Green and White Gala, or a trip to Ireland are currently budgeted. If the City Council decides to make a contribution to the Dublin Sister City Association in support of the 2020 Green & White Gala, a mid-year budget adjustment could be prepared. If the City Council decides the Mayor should travel to Ireland for a planning meeting with representatives from Bray and Wicklow County, a mid-year budget adjustment could be prepared. DESCRIPTION: At the June 18, 2019 City Council meeting, Councilmember Josey raised the topic of support for the Dublin Sister Cities Association (DSCA or Association) and the re was 8.1 Packet Pg. 481 Page 2 of 3 agreement to put the item on a future agenda for discussion. Since that time, the Mayor also received an invitation from the Wicklow County Council in Ireland to travel to Bray, Ireland this fall for a planning meeting to discuss a visit by a City o f Dublin delegation in 2020, as well as to discuss a possible new "Twinned Counties" relationship. Dublin Sister City Association DSCA incorporated as an organization in 1987 to foster Dublin’s new sister city relationship with Bray, Ireland. For the pas t three decades, DSCA has annually hosted several representatives from Bray who visit in March to participate in Dublin’s annual St. Patrick’s Day celebrations. The Green and White Gala, an annual formal dinner with live entertainment held on the weekend of the St. Patrick’s Day celebrations, is DSCA’s signature event and is held in honor of the visitors from Bray. The DSCA has a five-seat board and holds general member meetings three times each year. The Association’s primary source of revenue is membership dues. According to DSCA, membership has declined in recent years from more than 80 to approximately 35 people and the Association’s financial status has dwindled. The City is a member of DSCA and pays annual dues of $25 per year. According to DSCA, the cost to put on the Green & White Gala has increased in recent years and revenue for the Gala no longer covers the full expense of the event. DSCA is seeking financial support from the City in order to continue to host the Gala event. Invitation from the Wicklow County Council In June of 2019, Mayor Haubert received an invitation (Attachment 1) from the Wicklow County Council in Ireland to travel this fall to Ireland for a planning meeting to discuss a visit by a City of Dublin delegation in 2020, as well as to discuss a possible new sister or "Twinned Counties" relationship between Alameda County and Wicklow County. Town twinning is a common term used in Europe to describe an official relationship -building effort and means the same as “sister cities” or “sister counties.” Staff has researched the cost for Mayor Haubert to travel to Bray, Ireland in September or October and estimates the cost for a 3-night, 4-day stay not exceed $2,500. Sister Cities International Sister Cities International creates relationships based on cultural, educational, information and trade exchanges creating lifelong friendships that provide prosperity and peace through person-to-person “citizen diplomacy.” The Northern California Chapter of Sister Cities International has more than 40 member cities and assists Sister Cities International members by promoting and developing sister city activities in Northern California. The City was previously a member of Sister Cities International, however, the City’s membership was not renewed in 2017 due to an administrative error. Staff is in the process of renewing the City’s membership (annual dues: $790). STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: N/A 8.1 Packet Pg. 482 Page 3 of 3 NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: Kim Halket, the President of the Dublin Sister City Association has been invited to make a brief presentation at the meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Invitation from Wicklow County Council 8.1 Packet Pg. 483 8.1.aPacket Pg. 484Attachment: 1. Invitation from Wicklow County Council (Sister Cities Activities)