HomeMy WebLinkAbout*January 9, 2018 Agenda PacketJanuary 9, 2018 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 1 of 5
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, January 9, 2018
Council Chamber, 100 Civic Plaza DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL
A G E N D A
Agendas and Staff Reports are posted on the City’s Internet Website (www.dublin.ca.gov)
Agendas may be picked up at the City Clerk’s Office for no charge, or to request information on being placed on
the annual subscription list, please call 833-6650.
A complete packet of information containing Staff Reports and exhibits relate to each item is available of public
review at least 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting or, in the event that it is delivered to City Council
members less than 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting, as soon as it is so delivered. The packet is
available in the City Clerk’s Office and also at the Dublin Library.
CLOSED SESSION 6:00 P.M.
I. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (d) of
Section 54956.9: 2 cases
II. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 12+/- acre parcel located about 1,000 feet northwest of intersection of Dublin Blvd.
and Arnold Road (portion of the Camp Parks property)
Agency negotiator: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
Negotiating parties: Dublin Unified School District
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
3.1. East Bay Community Energy Status Update
The City Council will receive a report from East Bay Community Energy (EBCE), Alameda
County’s new community-governed power supplier, on the impending launch of EBCE.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
3.2. Public Comment
At this time, the public is permitted to address the City Council on non-agendized items. Please step to the podium and
clearly state your name for the record. COMMENTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with
State Law, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. The Council may
respond to statements made or questions asked, or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the
matter. Any member of the public may contact the City Clerk’s Office related to the proper procedure to place an item on a
future City Council agenda. The exceptions under which the City Council MAY discuss and/or take action on items not
appearing on the agenda are contained in Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(1)(2)(3).
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the City Council with
one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the City Council who would like an item removed from the Consent
Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor to remove the item.
January 9, 2018 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 2 of 5
4.1. Approval of the December 19, 2017 Regular and December 26, 2017 Special City
Council Meetings Minutes
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the December 19, 2017 Regular
and December 26, 2017 Special City Council meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the minutes of the December 19, 2017 Regular and December 26, 2017 Special City
Council meetings.
4.2. Project Acceptance for Dublin Sports Grounds and New Capital Improvement Project
(CIP) Creation for a Master Plan and All-Abilities Playground Design
On May 2, 2017, the City Council awarded a construction contract for the Dublin Sports
Grounds Renovation (CIP No. PK0416). The work is now complete and ready for City
Council acceptance and approval of a budget change. Additionally, the City Council will
consider the authorization of a new CIP (PK0518) to complete the Dublin Sports Grounds
Master Plan, which would include an all-abilities playground.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Accepting the Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation Project (CIP No.
PK0416), approve the creation of the Dublin Sports Grounds Rehabilitation Project (CIP No.
PK0518), and approve the budget change.
4.3. Award of Contract to Bockman and Woody Electric Co. for the Fiber Connection to
The Wave Project
The City Council will consider awarding a contract to Bockman and Woody Electric Co., to
complete the fiber connection portion of the capital project that constructed The Wave at
Emerald Glen Park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Awarding a Contract for
Project No. PK0105 to Bockman and Woody Electric Co. for the Fiber Connection to The
Wave at Emerald Glen Park.
4.4. Approval of Recreational Instructor Agreements
The City Council will consider approval of Contract Instructor Service Agreements for
recreational services for gymnastics, sport activities and camps, soccer and tennis that will
likely exceed the City Manager’s contract authority of $45,000.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving Contract Instructor Services Agreements with Akshay
Arora dba Arora Tennis, Edge Gymnastics, Northern American Youth Activities LLC dba
Kidz Love Soccer and Make Me a Pro Sports (sport activities and camps).
4.5. Military Discount at The Wave
The City Council will consider approval of a military discount for veterans, reservist and
active duty members of the military, as recommended by the Federal and Military
Communities Committee, and approve an associated amendment to the Master Fee Schedule.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Amending the Master Fee Schedule to Include a Military Discount to
The Wave Entrance Fee.
4.6. Request for Waiver of Competitive Bid Process and Authorization to Purchase Fire
Apparatus through Cooperative Purchasing Program Contracts and Sole Source the
Outfitting of the Apparatus Units to the Alameda County Fire Department
The City Council will consider waiving the competitive bid requirement and approving the
purchase of two replacement fire engines through cooperative purchasing agreements, and
the outfitting of the units by the Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD) as a sole source
provider.
January 9, 2018 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 3 of 5
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Waiving the Competitive Bid Process and Approving the Purchase of
Two Fire Engines Through Cooperative Purchasing Contracts, and Approving the Outfitting
of the Fire Engines by the Alameda County Fire Department as a Sole Source Provider; and
approve the budget change.
4.7. Approval of Calendar for Development of Fiscal Years 2018-19 and 2019-20 Budget
The City Council will consider approval of a calendar of key dates to guide the development
of the City’s Fiscal Years 2018-19 and 2019-20 Budget Update.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the budget calendar.
4.8. Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers
The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from December 1, 2017 -
December 31, 2017 totaling $3,212,054.10.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
4.9. Appointment to Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District
The City Council will consider the Mayor’s recommendation to appoint Alan Brown as the
City of Dublin appointee to the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Confirm the Mayor’s recommendation and adopt the Resolution Making an Appointment to
the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District Board of Trustees.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION – NONE.
6. PUBLIC HEARING – NONE.
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
7.1. Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3) Planned Development Rezone with a
related Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review Permit, and Tentative
Map 8437 (PLPA 2017-00036)
On December 5, 2017, the City Council heard the proposed Ashton at Dublin Station project.
The project consists of 220 apartment units, and related amenities including a fitness center,
pool, roof top lounge, and 331 parking structured spaces on a 2.36-acre site located within
the Dublin Transit Center. The proposed mix of residential units includes 122 one-bedroom
units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroom units. Following the public hearing, the
City Council deliberated and directed Staff to prepare a resolution of denial. At its December
19, 2017, the City Council directed Staff to place the item on the January 9, 2018 agenda for
the City Council to provide additional direction prior to Staff’s preparation of the resolution
of denial.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Provide Staff with direction.
7.2. Consideration of Potential Ballot Measures on Council and Mayoral Term Limits an d
Mayoral Term of Office
On December 5, 2017, the City Council reviewed the provisions of the Municipal Code that
establish term limits for the offices of the City Council and Mayor. The City Council
directed Staff to return with the three separate potential measures. Two of the items would
make changes to the existing term limits for the Mayor and City Council. The other would
change the term of office for the Mayor from two years to four years. If the City Council
desires to have the voters consider any of the proposed measures, it can direct Staff to return
with resolutions calling an election on one or more of the proposed measures.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Provide direction to Staff.
January 9, 2018 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 4 of 5
7.3. Utility Box Art 2018 Design Selection
The City Council will consider a recommendation from the Heritage and Cultural Arts
Commission for artwork to be painted on eight utility boxes along Amador Valley Boulevard
and Dublin Boulevard, under the Utility Box Art Program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission's selections for the Utility Box Art
Program.
7.4. Dublin Crossing Community Park Conceptual Plan
The City Council will consider approval of the Final Conceptual Plan for the Dublin
Crossing Community Park, including the pump station site and add alternates for the Valley
Children's Museum location.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Dublin Crossing Community Park Final Conceptual Plan.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1. Edy Coleman Memorial Bench
The City Council will consider a proposal to install a bench at Heritage Park's Pioneer
Cemetery in honor of longtime volunteer Edy Coleman.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the budget change from the General Fund Undesignated Reserve to cover the cost
of purchasing and installing a bench in Ms. Coleman's honor and direct Staff to proceed with
the purchase, installation, and naming ceremony.
8.2. Approval of a Banner Program Honoring Military Personnel
The City Council will consider creating a military banner program to honor active duty
military personnel or military veterans that reside in, or have immediate family in the City of
Dublin.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the Creation of a Military Banner Program.
8.3. Overview of Public Facility Fee Program
The City Council will receive an overview on the City's Public Facility Fee program and
provide Staff with direction on the establishment of a Repayment Policy for loans or
advances from the General Fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report and provide direction on the establishment of a loan repayment policy for
the Public Facility Fee Program.
8.4. Capital Improvement Program - Project Updates and Park Openings
The City Council will receive status updates on current Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
projects and upcoming park openings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
8.5. Volunteer Recognition - Proposed Event and Program Modifications
The City Council will consider proposed changes to the City's annual Volunteer Recognition
Event and the City's process for recognizing volunteers in the community. This item was
originally scheduled to be heard at the December 19, 2017 Regular City Council meeting,
and was moved to this meeting by City Council consensus.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the presentation and provide Staff with direction.
January 9, 2018 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 5 of 5
8.6. Consideration of Use of Rosenberg’s Rules of Order
The City Council will consider replacing Robert’s Rules of Order with Rosenberg’s Rules
of Order as the official parliamentary procedure for City Council and
Commission/Committee meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Review the Staff Report and provide Staff direction.
8.7. Lease and Option to Purchase 12-Acre Site in Dublin Crossing Development for a
School and Park Site
The City Council will consider an agreement with the Dublin Unified School District
(DUSD) that would give the District the right to purchase a City-owned, 12-acre site within
the Dublin Crossing project for $1.00 for use as a school/park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the Agreement for Lease and Property Option Between the
City of Dublin and the Dublin Unified School District for the Dublin Crossing School/Park
Site.
9. OTHER BUSINESS
Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports
and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234).
10. ADJOURNMENT
This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a)
If requested, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.2, this agenda shall be made available in appropriat e
alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. To make
a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office (925) 833-
6650 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Mission
The City of Dublin promotes and supports a high quality of life, ensures a safe and secure environment, and fosters
new opportunities.
Vision
Dublin is a vibrant city committed to its citizens, natural resources and cultural heritage. As Dublin grows, it will
balance history with progress, to sustain an enlightened, economically balanced and diverse community.
Dublin is unified in its belief that an engaged and informed community encourages innovation in all aspects of City
life, including programs to strengthen our economic vitality, and preserve our natural surroundings through
environmental stewardship and sustainability. Dublin is dedicated to promoting an active and healthy lifestyle
through the creation of first-class recreational opportunities, facilities and programs.
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
East Bay Community Energy Status Update
Prepared by: Shannan Young, Environmental Coordinator
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive a report from East Bay Community Energy (EBCE),
Alameda County’s new community-governed power supplier, on the impending launch
of EBCE.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the City of Dublin. This is an informational item.
DESCRIPTION:
East Bay Community Energy (EBCE) is a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA)
program which is committed to providing electricity generated from a high percentage of
renewable sources such as solar, wind and geothermal. Authorized by California law in
2002, CCA enables cities and county governments to pool the electricity demand within
their jurisdictions in order to procure or generate electrical power supplies on behalf of
the residents and businesses in their communities.
The City Council, at their November 15, 2016 meeting, adopted Resolution 168-16
(Attachment 1) approving an agreement to participate in the East Bay Community
Energy Authority Joint Powers Agency for a CCA Program in Alameda County and
approved an Uncodified Ordinance (Attachment 2) authorizing the implementation of a
CCA program in the City of Dublin.
EBCE Staff will provide an update on the CCA program for City Council.
3.1
Packet Pg. 6
Page 2 of 2
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None. EBCE will provide notification to new customers as they are enrolled; two notices
will be provided prior to enrollment, and two notices will be provided subsequent to
enrollment.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 168-16
2. Ordinance 13-16
3.1
Packet Pg. 7
3.1.a
Packet Pg. 8
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
6
8
-
1
6
(
E
a
s
t
B
a
y
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
E
n
e
r
g
y
S
t
a
t
u
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
)
3.1.a
Packet Pg. 9
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
6
8
-
1
6
(
E
a
s
t
B
a
y
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
E
n
e
r
g
y
S
t
a
t
u
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
)
3.1.b
Packet Pg. 10
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
1
3
-
1
6
(
E
a
s
t
B
a
y
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
E
n
e
r
g
y
S
t
a
t
u
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
)
3.1.b
Packet Pg. 11
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
1
3
-
1
6
(
E
a
s
t
B
a
y
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
E
n
e
r
g
y
S
t
a
t
u
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
)
3.1.b
Packet Pg. 12
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
1
3
-
1
6
(
E
a
s
t
B
a
y
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
E
n
e
r
g
y
S
t
a
t
u
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
)
Page 1 of 1
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Approval of the December 19, 2017 Regular and December 26, 2017
Special City Council Meetings Minutes
Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the December 19, 2017
Regular and December 26, 2017 Special City Council meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the minutes of the December 19, 2017 Regular and December 26, 2017
Special City Council meetings.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the December 19, 2017
Regular and December 26, 2017 Special City Council meetings.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Minutes of the December 19, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting
2. Draft Minutes of the December 26, 2017 Special City Council Meeting
4.1
Packet Pg. 13
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
REGULAR MEETING – DECEMBER 19, 2017
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 19, 2017
A Regular Meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, December 19,
2017, in the City Council Chamber. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM., by
Vice Mayor Don Biddle.
1. Call to Order
Attendee Name Title Status
David Haubert Mayor Absent
Don Biddle Vice Mayor Present
Arun Goel Councilmember Present
Abe Gupta Councilmember Present
Melissa Hernandez Councilmember Present
2. Pledge of Allegiance - The pledge of allegiance was recited by the City Council, Staff,
and those present at the meeting.
3. Oral Communications
3.1. Introduction to New Dublin Police Chief, Garrett Holmes
The City Council welcomed Garrett Holmes as the new Dublin Police Chief.
3.2. Public Comment
Bobby Khullar, Dublin resident, provided public comment.
4. Consent Calendar
Cm. Goel recused him from Item. 4.9 to avoid a common law conflict of interest.
4.1. Approved the minutes of the December 5, 2017 Regular City Council meeting.
4.2. Adopted the Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Fund Deposits and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 155 – 17
MAKING FINDINGS REGARDING UNEXPENDED
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-17
4.3. Accepted the Annual Report of Developer Impact Fee Funds Deposits and
adopted
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 14
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 19, 2017
RESOLUTION NO. 155 – 17
MAKING FINDINGS REGARDING UNEXPENDED
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-17
4.4. Received the City Engineer’s notification of the Final Map for Tract 8375.
4.5. Received the Payment Issuance Report.
4.6. Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 156 – 17
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE POOLED LIABILITY
ASSURANCE NETWORK [PLAN] JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
4.7. Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 157 – 17
AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN
RESOLUTION NO. 158 – 17
AMENDING THE SALARY PLAN FOR FULL-TIME PERSONNEL AND
MANAGEMENT POSITIONS EXEMPT FROM COMPETITIVE SERVICE
RESOLUTION NO. 159 – 17
AMENDING THE MANAGEMENT POSITIONS EXEMPT FROM COMPETITIVE
SERVICE RESOLUTION AND PRESCRIBING LEAVE BENEFITS FOR THE
DESIGNATED POSITIONS
4.8. Received the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
4.10. Receive the City’s disaster preparedness report and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 160 – 17
APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH PARKS RESERVE
FORCES TRAINING AREA (PRFTA), CALIFORNIA FOR EMERGENCY TRAINING
(W81WYN-17-301)
RESOLUTION NO. 161 – 17
APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH
THE AMERICAN RED CROSS
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 15
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 19, 2017
4.11. Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 162 – 17
APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR JORDAN
RANCH PARCEL D (NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SITE), ACCEPTING THE JORDAN
RANCH PARK IMPROVEMENTS, AND ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF DEDICATION
OF PARCEL D OF TRACT 8024
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: Abe Gupta, Councilmember
SECOND: Melissa Hernandez, Councilmember
AYES: Don Biddle, Arun Goel, Abe Gupta, Melissa Hernandez
ABSENT: David Haubert
4.9. Waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 10 – 17
AMENDING CHAPTER 7.04 OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS FOR WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
ORDINANCE NO. 11 – 17
AMENDING CHAPTER 8.92, 8.36, AND 8.104 OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES ON
PRIVATE PROPERTY
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: Abe Gupta, Councilmember
SECOND: Melissa Hernandez, Councilmember
AYES: Don Biddle, Abe Gupta, Melissa Hernandez
RECUSED: Arun Goel
ABSENT: David Haubert
5. Written Communication – None.
6. Public Hearing – None.
7. Unfinished Business – None.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 19, 2017
8. New Business
8.1. Volunteer Recognition - Proposed Event and Program Modifications
By consensus, the City Council continued this item to the January 9, 2018
meeting.
8.2. City Council St. Patrick's Day Parade Participation
By consensus, the City Council agreed to walk in the parade with the Historic
Model A Truck where City Council can hand giveaways to parade onlookers.
8.3. Appointment to Board of Directors for the Tri-Valley - San Joaquin Valley
Regional Rail Authority
The City Council appointed Vice Mayor Biddle to the Board.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: Abe Gupta, Councilmember
SECOND: Melissa Hernandez, Councilmember
AYES: Don Biddle, Arun Goel, Abe Gupta, Melissa Hernandez
ABSENT: David Haubert
8.4. Appointment of Delegate to Attend the National League of Cities
Congressional City Conference and Designation of Voting Delegate for the
2018 National League of Cities Annual Conference
By consensus, the City Council agreed to delegate Cm. Gupta to the March
event and Cm. Hernandez to the November event; and delegate Vm. Biddle as
the alternate for both events.
9. Other Business – Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff,
including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at
City expense (AB1234).
By consensus, the City Council agreed to have a Special Meeting related to Dublin
Crossing.
By consensus, the City Council agreed to articulate what was objectionable with the
Transit Center Site A-3 project and combine it with the item that includes the resolution
to deny the project set for the January 9, 2018 meeting.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 19, 2017
10. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:29 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
SPECIAL MEETING – DECEMBER 26, 2017
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1
SPECIAL MEETING
DECEMBER 26, 2017
A Special Meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, December 26,
2017, in the City Council Chamber. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 PM., by
Mayor Pro Tem Biddle.
I. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor David Haubert: Remote
Vice Mayor Don Biddle: Present
Councilmember Arun Goel: Present
Councilmember Abe Gupta: Present
Councilmember Melissa Hernandez: Present
II. Closed Session
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 12+/- acre parcel located about 1,000 feet northwest of intersection of Dublin
Blvd. and Arnold Road (portion of the Camp Parks property)
Agency negotiator: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
Negotiating parties: Dublin Unified School District
Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
III. Report on Closed Session
There was no report out of Closed Session.
IV. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 6:46 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 19
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
6
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Project Acceptance for Dublin Sports Grounds and New Capital
Improvement Project (CIP) Creation for a Master Plan and All-Abilities
Playground Design
Prepared by: Rosemary Alex, Parks and Facilities Devlopment Coordinator
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On May 2, 2017, the City Council awarded a construction contract for the Dublin Sports
Grounds Renovation (CIP No. PK0416). The work is now complete and ready for City
Council acceptance and approval of a budget change. Additionally, the City Council will
consider the authorization of a new CIP (PK0518) to complete the Dublin Sports
Grounds Master Plan, which would include an all-abilities playground.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Accepting the Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation Project (CIP
No. PK0416), approve the creation of the Dublin Sports Grounds Rehabilitation Project
(CIP No. PK0518), and approve the budget change.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
In order to close out the Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation project (CIP No. PK0416), a
budget change in the amount of $10,000 is needed to cover additional Staff time and
inspection services during the course of construction, as shown in the table below.
4.2
Packet Pg. 20
Page 2 of 3
Project Funding Sources
State of California Housing Grants 831,100.00$
General Fund 50,000.00$
Total Funding Sources 881,000.00$
Project Expenditures
Non-Construction Costs:
Miscellaneous (Filling Fees, Printing, Postage, Legal) $ 7,758.00
Staff Time $ 29,900.00
Maintenance Equipment (Groomer, Two Gators, Tractor) $ 114,137.00
Contract Services (Design, Geotech, Inspection) $ 179,959.00
Site Furniture and Structures $ 248,254.00
Original Construction Contract Amount $ 291,160.00
Change Order #1 $ 19,831.83
Total Project Costs 890,999.83$
Additional Budget Needed to Close Project 10,000.00$
In addition, Staff is seeking approval to create the Dublin Sports Grounds Rehabilitation
Project (CIP No. PK0518), funded with an initial $300,000, to complete a master plan for
the overall park. The General Fund Reserve for the Dublin Sports Ground has a
balance of $2.5 million and can cover the total budget increase of $310,000 for the two
actions requested in this report.
DESCRIPTION:
Project Acceptance
On May 2, 2017, the City Council approved a construction contract with Suarez and
Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation Project (CIP No.
PK0416). The primary source of funding for the project was from the State of California
Department of Housing and Community Development the Housing-Related Parks
Program. The scope of work included improvements to baseball fields #4, #5 and #6,
including the installation of six new dugout shade structures and benches, three new
scorekeeper booths, trash and recycling receptacles and concrete accessible paving
and drinking fountain for field #6.
During construction, there were some corrective measures by the contractor in order to
close out the Project resulting in additional Staff time. A budget change in the amount
of $10,000 is requested to cover the additional Staff and inspection costs.
The City presently holds a performance bond in the amount of $291,160 to provide the
necessary security for the performance of the work involved. Since the work is now
complete and ready for acceptance, the performance security requirement can be
reduced in accordance with authority contained in Section 66499.7 of the Government
Code, to an amount necessary to guarantee warranty of the work for a one-year period
following acceptance of the work. The Contractor will provide a new maintenance bond
4.2
Packet Pg. 21
Page 3 of 3
in the amount of $31,991 which is 10% of the final contract amount, and is sufficient to
cover the one-year guarantee period.
New Capital Improvement Project (PK0518) -Dublin Sports Grounds Rehabilitation
With the grant-funded portion of the Project complete, Staff is seeking City Council
authorization to form a new CIP. The proposed project will entail the completion of the
master planning process that was initiated with the community input meeting in
February 2016. The new project will continue the planning process and complete a
master plan and report for the overall park. As part of the overall master plan, Staff will
include the development of detailed plans and specifications to construct an all-abilities
playground. The $300,000 will allow Staff to proceed with the master planning process
and initiate design documents for the playground this Fiscal Year. As part of the
budget process for next Fiscal Year, Staff will seek additional resources for the
construction portion of the project.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A copy of the Staff Report will be sent to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Accepting the Dublin Sports Grounds Renovation Project
2. Budget Change Form
4.2
Packet Pg. 22
ATTACHMENT #1
RESOLUTION NO. XX - 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * * * *
ACCEPTING THE DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS RENOVATION PROJECT (CIP NO.
PK0416)
WHEREAS, on May 2, 2017 the City of Dublin entered into a contract with Suarez
and Munoz Construction, Inc. to construct the Dublin Sports Renovation Project (CIP No.
PK0416); and
WHEREAS, the improvements have been completed in accordance with the plans
and specifications, and any approved modifications thereof, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer of the City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of the contract, Suarez and Munoz Construction Inc. is
required to warranty the improvements for a period of one year following acceptance of the
work by the City of Dublin and maintain a maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the
final contract value; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Dublin does hereby accept the improvements, Dublin Sports Renovation Project (CIP
No. PK0416), and authorize Staff to file a Notice of Completion with Alameda County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby authorize the City Manager or his designee to release the retention, if after 35
days of filing the Notice of Completion there are no subcontractor claims.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 2018, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
c
e
p
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
p
o
r
t
s
G
r
o
u
n
d
s
R
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
N
e
w
C
I
P
)
Budget Change Reference #:
From Un-Appropriated ReservesX Budget Transfer Between Funds
From Designated Reserves Other
Account Amount Account Amount
pk0416.9100.9101 - Salaries & Benefits $5,900
pk0416.9200.9209 - Inspections $4,100
3500.9501.49999 (Transfers In)$10,000
pk0416.1001 (1001.9501.89101) - General Fund - Transfers Out $10,000
pk0518.9100.9101 - Salaries & Benefits $40,000
pk0518.9200.9202 - Design $100,000
pk0518.9200.9206 - Testing $10,000
pk0518.9500.9502 - Processing/Filling Fees $20,000
pk0518.9400.9401- Improvements - Not Bldg $130,000
3500.9501.49999 (Transfers In)$300,000
pk0518.1001 (1001.9501.89101) - General Fund - Transfers Out $300,000
1/9/2018
Posted By:Date:
As Presented at the City Council Meeting
**********Finance Use Only**********
CITY OF DUBLIN
(1) Dublin Sports Ground Renovation budget changes - to cover the additional staff and project inspection time to complete the
construction of recent improvements at Dublin Sports Grounds
REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE
FISCAL YEAR 2017-18
BUDGET CHANGE FORM
DECREASE BUDGET AMOUNT INCREASE BUDGET AMOUNT
City Council's Approval Required
EXP: Dublin Sports Ground Renovation (1)
EXP: Dublin Sports Ground Rehabilitation (2)
(2) Dublin Sports Ground Rehabilitation budget changes - to allow Staff to complete the master plan and to initiate detailed plans
and specifications for the All-Abilities Playground at Dublin Sports Grounds during this current fiscal year
Attachment #2
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
B
u
d
g
e
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
F
o
r
m
(
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
N
e
w
C
I
P
)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Award of Contract to Bockman and Woody Electric Co. for the Fiber
Connection to The Wave Project
Prepared by: Colleen Tribby, Director of Administrative Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider awarding a contract to Bockman and Woody Electric Co.,
to complete the fiber connection portion of the capital project that constructed The Wave
at Emerald Glen Park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Awarding a Contract
for Project No. PK0105 to Bockman and Woody Electric Co. for the Fiber Connection to
The Wave at Emerald Glen Park.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
As part of the capital improvement project to construct The Wave at Emerald Glen Park
(CIP No. PK0105), $150,000 in funding from the Information Technology Fund was
included to provide for a fiber connection to facility. This amount is sufficient to cover the
lowest responsible bid of $106,551.00 submitted by Bockman and Woody Electric Co.
There is no impact to the General Fund.
DESCRIPTION:
This project provides for furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and services to
install a new fiber optic cable connection to The Wave at Emerald Glen Park. The new
cable will be pulled though existing conduit and existing City-owned pull boxes. The
fiber connection will deliver a fast, reliable connection to the City network at The Wave.
The bid was published on October 20, 2017 and closed on November 14, 2017. A total
of four bids were received, summarized as follows:
1. Bockman and Woody Electric Co. - $106,551.00
2. Crosspoint General Engineering - $112,350.00
4.3
Packet Pg. 25
Page 2 of 2
3. MP Nexlevel of California - $132,888.40
4. Itech Solution - $200,950.00
Staff has reviewed the bid results, checked necessary references and licenses, and
recommends that the City Council award the fiber connection project to Bockman and
Woody Electric Co as the lowest bidder. Staff expects this work to be completed by
early May 2018.
The capital improvement project to construct The Wave included $150,000 from the
Information Technology Fund for this work.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A copy of this Staff Report was sent to Bockman and Woody Electric Co.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Awarding a Contract to
Bockman and Woody Electric Co.
4.3
Packet Pg. 26
RESOLUTION NO. XX- 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PK0105 TO BOCKMAN AND WOODY ELECTRIC CO. FOR THE FIBER CONNECTION TO THE WAVE AT EMERALD GLEN PARK
WHEREAS, Staff completed plans and specifications for the Fiber Connection to The Wave at Emerald Glen Park, Project No. PK0105 ("Project"). The work provides for the furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and services to install a new fiber optic cable to T he Wave; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin did, on November 14, 2017, publicly open, examine, and declare all sealed bids for doing the work described in the approved Plans, Specifications, and Modifications for the Project, which Plans, Specifications, and Modifications are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said work and for all particulars relative to the proceedings under the request for bids; and
WHEREAS, said bids were submitted to the Public Works Director, who has recommended that the bid hereinafter is the lowest and best bid for doing said work; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby approves the plans and specifications for the Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby award the Contract for Project No. PK0105, the Fiber Connection to The Wave at Emerald Glen Park, to the lowest responsible bidder therefore, to wit, Bockman and Woody Electric Co., at a bid of $106,551, the particulars of which bid are on file in the Office of the Public Works Director.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager or his designee to approve the project Contract Change Orders based on the appropriated funds designated for Project No. PK0105 up to a contingency amount of $10,655.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the contract with Bockman and Woody Electric Co.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 2018, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTACHMENT 1
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
A
w
a
r
d
i
n
g
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
t
o
B
o
c
k
m
a
n
a
n
d
W
o
o
d
y
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
C
o
.
(
F
i
b
e
r
P
u
l
l
)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Approval of Recreational Instructor Agreements
Prepared by: Andrew Freeman Jr., Business Services Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approval of Contract Instructor Service Agreements for
recreational services for gymnastics, sport activities and camps, soccer and tennis that
will likely exceed the City Manager’s contract authority of $45,000.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving Contract Instructor Services Agreements with Akshay
Arora dba Arora Tennis, Edge Gymnastics, Northern American Youth Activities LLC dba
Kidz Love Soccer and Make Me a Pro Sports (sport activities and camps).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
At the end of the contract period, it is forecasted revenues generated by these activities
will exceed expenditure amounts.
DESCRIPTION:
The City's Parks and Community Services Department contracts for certain recreational
programming to meet the needs of the community. These proposals are reviewed by
Staff to determine if the activity meets the Department’s mission and goals. Accepted
proposals are then reviewed by PCS for facility suitability, availability, costs and fee
structure. Selected instructors set the prices for activities.
In most instances, payments to these contractors do not exceed the City Manager's
signing authority annually. However, there are a handful of contracts where it is
anticipated that the payments to the contractor will be in excess of $45,000. In these
instances, the City Council must approve the contracts.
Following is a summary of those contracts. The term of these agreements shall end on
December 31, 2018. Contract terms for these recreational agreements will support
services scheduled for the Fall, Winter, Spring and Summer. The City and Instructor
will each receive a percentage of revenue based on the terms of the agreement.
4.4
Packet Pg. 28
Page 2 of 2
Contract services from each instructor are described in the attached agreements.
Akshay Arora dba Arora Tennis: provide tennis classes, camps, activities and
private tennis lessons. The City agrees to pay instructor 80% of the resident rate
for each private lesson participant and 60% of the resident rate for each group
lesson participant.
Edge Gymnastics: provide gymnastics classes, camps and activities. The City
agrees to pay instructor 70% of the resident rate for each participant.
Northern American Youth Activities LLC dba Kidz Love Soccer: provide soccer
classes and activities. The City agrees to pay instructor 60% of the resident rate
for each participant.
Make Me a Pro Sports: provide basketball, cheerleading, sport classes and
activities. The City agrees to pay instructor 60% of the resident rate for each
participant.
Three of the four agreements have already been executed by the Parks and Community
Services Director with an effective date of September 1, 2017, while the fourth
agreement (Akshay Arora dba Arora Tennis) has an effective date of January 2018.
However, upon further review of future recreation programming, it is anticipated that
these three already-executed agreements will exceed the City Manager's authority of
$45,000 and require City Council approval to be in compliance with the City's
Purchasing Policy.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The instructor contracts have been shared with the instructors.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving Contract Instructor Services Agreements with Akshay DBA
Arora Tennis, Edge Gymnastics, Kidz Love Soccer and Make Me a Pro Sports
2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Akshay Arora Contractor Instructor Agreement
3. Exhibit B to the Resolution - Edge Gymnastics Contract Instructor Agreement
4. Exhibit C to the Resolution - Make Me a Pro Sports Contract Instructor Agreement
5. Exhibit D to the Resolution - Kidz Love Soccer Contract Instructor Agreement
4.4
Packet Pg. 29
RESOLUTION NO. XX - 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * * * *
APPROVING CONTRACT INSTRUCTOR SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH AKSHAY
ARORA DBA ARORA TENNIS, EDGE GYMNASTICS, KIDZ LOVE SOCCER AND
MAKE ME A PRO SPORTS
WHEREAS, the Parks and Community Services Department receives and approves
proposals from independent contractors who are interested in providing recreational
activities or programs to the Dublin community; and
WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed and accepted proposal to provide recreational
services; and
WHEREAS, the City has accepted proposals from Akshay Arora (tennis), Edge
Gymnastics (gymnastics), Kidz Love Soccer (soccer) and Make Me a Pro Sports (sport
activities and camps); and
WHEREAS, three of the four agreements (Edge Gymnastics, Kidz Love Soccer and
Make Me a Pro Sports) were executed by Parks and Community Services Director on
September 1, 2017; and
WHEREAS, upon further review of the planned upcoming recreation programming, it
is anticipated that the expenditures relating to these agreements will exceed $45,000 per
contract, requiring City Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the contract instructor agreement with Akshay Arora tennis will exceed
the $45,000 authority of the City Manager and has not been executed by the Parks and
Community Services Director.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Dublin hereby approves the agreements with Akshay Arora, Edge Gymnastics, Kidz
Love Soccer, and Make Me a Pro Sports attached as hereto as Exhibits A-D.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or designee is authorized to
execute the agreements.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January 2018, by the
following vote:
AYES:
4.4.a
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
A
k
s
h
a
y
D
B
A
A
r
o
r
a
T
e
n
n
i
s
,
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
,
K
i
d
z
L
o
v
e
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
4.4.a
Packet Pg. 31
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
A
k
s
h
a
y
D
B
A
A
r
o
r
a
T
e
n
n
i
s
,
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
,
K
i
d
z
L
o
v
e
Agreement for Contract Instructor Services
AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT INSTRUCTOR SERVICES
Akshay Arora, Arora Tennis & Fitness
This Agreement for Contract Instructor Services (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of
January ______ 2018 by and between the City of Dublin, a municipal corporation of the State of California
("City") and Akshay Arora Tennis and Fitness (“Instructor”), together (the “Parties”) in Dublin, California. In
consideration of their mutual covenants, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Scope of Work. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Instructor shall provide
tennis classes, camps, activities and private tennis lessons.
2. Location of Work. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Instructor will
provide services and/or class instruction (check one box):
Offsite: At his/her/their own facility, located off-premises from any City-owned facility
located at .
(Street, City, Zip Code)
Onsite: At a City-owned facility.
3. Independent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Instructor, and
any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents shall be independent contractors and not
employees or agents of the City. Instructor and any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents
shall have no authority, express or implied, to bind the City to any obligation whatsoever. Notwithstanding any
other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Instructor and any of its
employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for
or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any and all claims to, any com pensation, benefit, or any
incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees
Retirement System (CalPERS) as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for
employer contributions and/or employee contributions for CalPERS benefits.
4. Term of Performance. Unless earlier terminated, this Agreement will be effective from the date
first above written through Decem ber 31, 2018 subject to City Council appropriation of funds. Upon mutual
agreement the City and Instructor shall have the option to extend the term of this agreement for two (2)
additional terms of one (1) year (“Extension Term”), upon the same terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement, subject to the City Council appropriation of funds. All terms and conditions of this Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect during the Extension Term, except as otherwise agreed through a formal
Amendment as required in Section 25. Nothing in this paragraph shall alter City’s right to terminate Agreement,
as described in Section 17, at any point throughout the Extension Term. This Agreement does not guarantee
that any course, program or activity will be added to the City’s public recreation offerings during the Term of
Performance.
5. Standard of Performance. Instructor shall perform all services required pursuant to this
Agreement.
6. Permission. Instructor grants full permission to the City of Dublin for use of his/her name and
photographs, videos, motion pictures or recordings for any publicity and promotion purposes without obligation
or liability to Instructor.
7. Payment Terms. For the services described in Section 1 above, the City agrees to pay
Instructor 80% of the resident rate for each participant, which amount shall include all expenses. Except as
specifically authorized by City, Instructor shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one
person (reasonable quality control and assurance work as generally recognized as an acceptable practice in this
field is expected). Instructor understands that any time a participant requests a refund or credit, that amount will
be reduced from the gross revenue on which Instructor’s payment is calculated.
4.4.b
Packet Pg. 32
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
A
k
s
h
a
y
A
r
o
r
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Agreement for Contract Instructor Services
Instructor understands and agrees that Instructor will complete and submit a Contract Instructor Course
Proposal Form for each session that courses will be offered. Submitting a proposal does not guarantee that the
course, program or activity will be added to the City’s public recreation offerings. Session dates may be altered
from time to time at the City’s discretion. City, at its sole discretion, will accept or reject Instructor’s proposal and
collaborate with Instructor in finalizing a session schedule. When each session schedule is finalized, the City will
produce a Schedule Summary. Final Schedule Summaries will be incorporated herein by this reference as if set
forth in full.
At the end of each session, the City shall pay Instructor for services rendered. City will issue payment
to Instructor within 30 business days after services are complete. Prior to City processing payment, Instructor
shall submit course attendance sheets, and completed evaluation forms, if applicable, to the Parks and
Community Services Department within five working days upon completion of service.
8. Assignment and Subcontracting. Instructor shall not subcontract, assign or transfer any
portion of the performance contemplated and provided for in this Agreement without the prior written consent of
the City.
9. Indemnification. Instructor will defend and indemnify City and its officers, agents, employees
and volunteers (collectively, "City Parties") against any and all claims, deductibles, self-insured retentions,
demands, liability, judgments, awards, fines, mechanics’ liens, or other liens, labor disputes, losses, damages,
expenses, charges or costs, of any kind or character, including attorneys’ fees and court costs (collectively,
“Claims”), which arise out of or are in any way connected to this Agreement or Instructor’s activities pursuant to
this Agreement, including without limitation, Claims caused by the concurrent negligent act, error, or om ission,
whether active or passive, of City Parties.
10. Insurance. Instructor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance
against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the
performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Instructor, any of its employees,
subcontractors, volunteers, and agents. Instructor will obtain and maintain policies of commercial general liability
insurance, automobile liability insurance and workers’ compensation insurance from an insurance company
authorized to transact the business of insurance in the State of California which has a current rating in the Best’s
Key Rating guide of at least A:VII. The insurance requirements required for instructors are as follows:
1. Commercial General Liability: Insurance plan with an “occurrence” basis, including property damage,
bodily injury, personal & advertising injury, and sexual abuse and molestation with limits no less than
$1,000,000 per occurrence.
2. Automobile Liability: Instructor shall maintain a current and valid Automobile Insurance Policy at or
above the minimum level required by the State of California for any and all vehicles used to transport
Instructor or supplies to or from the City of Dublin and its facilities.
3. Workers’ Compensation: Insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and
Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease. Proof of workers’ compensation insurance is applicable if Instructor has employees other than
self. If Instructor does not have employees other than self, Instructor shall submit a completed “No
Employees Declaration Form” provided by the City.
The insurance will be in force during the life of this Agreement and will not be canceled without thirty (30) days
prior written notice to the City by certified mail. The City of Dublin and its elected officials, officers, employees,
agents, and volunteers must be named as additional insureds on commercial general liability insurance.
Instructor’s insurance coverage will be primary insurance with respect to City and its elected officials, officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers. The insurance policy must include a waiver of all rights of subrogation
against the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents, and employees for losses paid under the
terms of any policy which arise from work performed by the Instructor for the City (including workers’
compensation insurance, if applicable). Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City will be in excess
of Instructor’s insurance and not contributory with it. Instructor will furnish certificates of insurance and
endorsements to City prior to City’s execution of this Agreement. This Agreement is expressly contingent upon
the insurance requirements being met, and this Agreement shall not be complete and no work may commence
until Instructor has provided adequate proof of insurance.
4.4.b
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
A
k
s
h
a
y
A
r
o
r
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Agreement for Contract Instructor Services
The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior
experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
11. Special Risks or Circumstances. City reserves the right to modify these insurance
requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other
special circumstances.
12. Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Instructor will comply with all applicable federal,
state, and local laws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in the
provision or any services that are the subject of this Agreement.
13. Mandated Reporting. Instructor recognizes and acknowledges that persons under the age of
18 may participate in classes/activities to be conducted by Instructor pursuant to this Agreement. Instructor
further recognizes and acknowledges that if any person under the age of 18 does, in fact, participate in said
classes/activities, then Instructor is deemed to be a “Mandated Reporter” pursuant to the California Child Abuse
and Neglect Reporting Act (Penal Code §§ 11164-11174.3) (“CANRA”). Concurrently with the execution of this
Agreement and pursuant to Penal Code section 11166.5, Instructor has been provided with, and has executed,
an Acknowledgement of Mandated Requirements, Receipt of Training, and Receipt of Penal Code Statutes,
which acknowledgement shall be maintained by the City during the term of this Agreement.
If the Instructor has employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents, and those employees, subcontractors,
volunteers, and agents will come into contact with minors on a regular basis, those employees must also follow
the Mandated Reporter requirements. Instructors who have employees will be required to execute an
Acknowledgement and Release of Information, which acknowledgement shall be maintained by the City during
the term of this Agreement.
14. TB Test Requirements. If the Services include contact with minors, Instructor shall produce a
certificate, issued by a licensed physician or other authorized agency, showing that within the last two years the
Instructor has been examined and has been found to be free of communicable tuberculosis (TB). If the
Instructor has employees, those employees must also follow the TB requirements set forth in this Agreement.
Instructors who have employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents will be required to execute an
Acknowledgement and Release of Information, which acknowledgement shall be maintained by the City during
the term of this Agreement.
15. Fingerprint Requirements. If class/program is open to youth under the age of 18 years,
Instructor and any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents of the Instructor agrees to fulfill all
fingerprint/background checks prior to the first class. Instructor and the Instructor’s employees, subcontractors,
volunteers, and agents, if any, are not eligible to work until the clearance is received from the Department of
Justice and Instructor has been notified by a Parks & Community Services Department representative.
16. Transporting Participants. Instructor or any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and
agents shall not transport any participant in his/her own vehicle. Transportation is the responsibility of the
program participant.
17. Termination. City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon written
notification to Instructor. Instructor may cancel this Agreement upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to the other
Parties and shall include in such notice the reasons for cancellation. City will pay Instructor for services
completed per the Agreement up to the time of termination, if the Services have been completed in accordance
with the Agreement.
In addition, if the Instructor is convicted of any crime or offense, fails or refuses to comply with the
written policies or reasonable directive of City, is guilty of serious misconduct in connection with performance
hereunder, or materially breaches provisions of this Agreement, City at any time may terminate the engagement
of the Instructor immediately and without written notice to the Instructor.
4.4.b
Packet Pg. 34
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
A
k
s
h
a
y
A
r
o
r
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Agreement for Contract Instructor Services
By signing this Agreement, Instructor agrees it may be subject to civil penalties for the filing of false
claims as set forth in the California False Claims Act, Government Code sections 12650, et seq.
18. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in
full force and effect.
19. Governing Law . The laws of the State of California will govern this Agreement.
20. Compliance with Applicable Laws. Instructor will comply with all applicable local, state and
federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, those prohibiting discrimination and harassment and
will obtain and maintain a City of Dublin Business License for the term of this Agreement.
21. Licenses. If a license (e.g. franchise names or trademarks) of any kind, which term is intended
to include evidence of registration, is required of Instructor or any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers,
or agents by federal or state law, Instructor warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good
standing, and Instructor shall keep it in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, and that any
applicable bond has been posted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
22. Venue. In the event that either party brings any action against the other under this Agreement,
the parties agree that trial of such action will be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County
of Alameda or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
23. Agreement Administration and Notice. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of
the City by the City Manager or designee. Any written notice between the Parties shall be sent to:
Mailing Address:
City of Dublin
Attn: Parks and Community Services Director
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Phone: (925) 833-6645
Mailing Address:
Arora Tennis & Fitness
Attn: Akshay Arora
3169 Ridgefield Way
Dublin, Ca 94568
Phone: (925) 699-7794
24. Integration. This Agreement, together with Schedule Summaries as described in Section 7
represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and the Instructor and supersedes all prior
negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral.
parties.
25. Amendments. The parties may amend this Agreement only by a writing signed by all the
26. No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of performance or any breach of a specific
provision of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term of
this Agreement.
27. Survival. All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Agreement and all the provisions
of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Instructor will survive the termination of this agreement.
CITY: INSTRUCTOR/BUSINESS:
By:
James M. Rodems,
By:
Parks and Community Services Director Printed Name:
Title:
4.4.b
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
A
k
s
h
a
y
A
r
o
r
a
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTINSTRUCTOR SERVICES
Edge GymnasticsTraining Center
This Agreement for Contract Instructor Services ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the 1st
day ofSeptember, 2017, by and between the CityofDublin, a municipal corporation ofthe State of California
City") and CGS GymnasticServices, Inc., ("Instructor"), together (the "Parties") in Dublin, California. In
consideration of their mutual covenants, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Scope of Work. Subject tothe terms and conditions of this Agreement, Instructor shall provide
gymnastic classes, camps and activities.
2. Location of Work. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Instructor will
provide services and/or classinstruction (check one box):
x Offsite: At his/her/their own facility, located off-premises fromany City-
owned facility located at 6780 SierraCourt in Dublin, CA 94568.
Onsite: At a City-owned facility.
3. Independent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Instructor, and
anyof its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents shall be independentcontractors and not
employees or agents of the City. Instructor and any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents
shall have no authority, express or implied, to bind the City to any obligation whatsoever. Notwithstanding any
other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance tothe contrary, Instructor and any of its
employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agentsproviding servicesunder this Agreement shallnot qualify for
or become entitled to, and hereby agreeto waive any and all claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any
incident of employment by City, including butnot limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees
Retirement System (CaIPERS) as an employeeof City and entitlement to anycontribution to be paid by City for
employercontributions and/or employee contributions for CalPERSbenefits.
4. Term of Performance. Unless earlier terminated, this Agreement will be effective from the date
first above written through December 31, 2018. Upon mutual agreement the City and Instructor shallhave the
option to extend the term of this Agreementfor two (2) additional terms of one (1) year ("Extension Term") upon
the same terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, subject to the City Council appropriationof funds. All
terms and conditionsof this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect during the ExtensionTerm, except as
otherwise agreedthrough a formal Amendment as required in Section 25. Nothing in this paragraphshall alter
City's right to terminate Agreement as described in Section 17, at any point throughout the Extension Term.
This Agreement does not guarantee that any course, program or activity will be addedto the City's public
recreation offerings duringtheTermof Performance.
5. Standard of Performance. Instructor will perform all services requiredpursuant to this
Agreement.
6. Permission. Instructor grants full permission tothe City of Dublin for use of his/her name and
photographs, videos, motion pictures or recordings for any publicity and promotionpurposes without obligation
or liability to Instructor.
7. Payment Terms. Forthe services described in Section 1 above, the City agrees to pay
Instructor 70% of the resident rate for each participant, which amount shall include all expenses. Except as
specifically authorized by City, Instructor shall not bill City for duplicateservices performed by more thanone
person (reasonablequality control and assurancework as generally recognized as an acceptable practice in this
field is expected). Instructorunderstands that any time a participant requests a refund or credit, that amount will
be reduced fromthegross revenue on which Instructor's payment is calculated.
Agreement for Contract Instructor Services
4.4.c
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Instructor understands and agrees thatInstructor will complete and submit a ContractInstructorCourse
Proposal Form for each sessionthatcourses will be offered. Submitting a proposal does not guarantee that the
course, program or activity will be added to the City's publicrecreation offerings. Session datesmay be altered
from time to time at the City's discretion. City, at its sole discretion, will accept or reject Instructor's proposal and
collaborate with Instructor in finalizing a session schedule. When each session schedule is finalized, the City will
produce a Schedule Summary. Final ScheduleSummaries will be incorporated herein by this reference as if set
forth in full.
At the end of each session, the City shall pay Instructor for services rendered. City will issue payment
to Instructor within 30 business days afterservicesarecomplete. All payments will be mailedtothe instructor.
Prior to Cityprocessing payment, Instructor shall submit course attendancesheets, and completed evaluation
forms, if applicable, totheParks and CommunityServices Department within five working days upon completion
of service.
8. Assignment and Subcontracting. instructor shall not subcontract, assign or transfer any
portion of the performance contemplated and provided for in this Agreement without the prior written consent of
the City.
9. Indemnification. Instructor will defend and indemnify City and its officers, agents, employees
and volunteers (collectively, "City Parties") againstany and all claims, deductibles, self-insured retentions,
demands, liability, judgments, awards, fines, mechanics' liens, or other liens, labor disputes, losses, damages,
expenses, charges or costs, ofany kind or character, including attorneys' fees and court costs (collectively,
Claims"), which ariseout of or are in any way connected to this Agreement or Instructor's activities pursuant to
this Agreement, including without limitation, Claimscaused by the concurrent negligent act, error, or omission,
whether active or passive, of CityParties.
10. Insurance. Instructor shall procure and maintain for the durationof the Agreement insurance
against claims for injuries to persons or damages to propertywhich may arisefrom or in connection with the
performance of the workhereunder and the results of that work by the Instructor, any of its employees,
subcontractors, volunteers, and agents. Instructor will obtain and maintain policies of commercial general liability
insurance, automobile liability insurance and workers' compensation insurance from an insurance company
authorized to transact the business of insurance in the State ofCalifornia which has a current rating in the Best's
Key Rating guideof atleast A:VII.The insurance requirements required for instructors are as follows:
1. Commercial General Liability: Insurance plan with an "occurrence" basis, including property damage,
bodily injury, personal & advertisinginjury, and sexual abuse and molestation with limits no less than
1,000,000 per occurrence.
2. Automobile Liability: Instructor shall maintain a current and valid Automobile InsurancePolicy at or
abovetheminimum level requiredby the State of California for any and all vehicles used to transport
Instructor or supplies toor from theCity of Dublin and its facilities.
3. Workers' Compensation: Insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and
Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease. Proof of workers' compensation insurance is applicable if Instructor has employees other than
self. If Instructor does not have employees other than self, Instructor shall submit a completed "No
Employees Declaration Form" provided by the City.
Theinsurance will be in force during the life of this Agreement and will not be canceled withoutthirty (30) days
prior written notice to the City by certified mail. TheCity of Dublinand its elected officials, officers, employees,
agents, and volunteers must be named as additional insureds on commercial generalliability insurance.
Instructor's insurancecoverage will be primary insurance with respect to City and its elected officials, officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers. The insurance policymust include a waiver of all rights of subrogation
against theCity, its elected or appointedofficers, officials, agents, and employees for losses paid under the
terms of any policy which arise fromworkperformedby the Instructor for the City (including workers'
compensationinsurance, if applicable). Any insurance or self-insurancemaintained by the City will be in excess
of Instructor's insurance and not contributory with it. Instructor will furnishcertificates of insurance and
endorsements to City prior to City's execution of this Agreement. This Agreement is expresslycontingent upon
Agreement for Contract Instructor Services
4.4.c
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
the insurancerequirements being met, and this Agreement shall not be complete and no work may commence
until Instructor has provided adequate proof of insurance.
The City reserves theright to modify theserequirements, includinglimits, based on the nature of the risk, prior
experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
11. Special Risks or Circumstances. Cityreserves the right to modifytheseinsurance
requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other
special circumstances.
12. Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Instructor will comply with all applicablefederal,
state, and locallaws, policies, rules, and requirements related to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in the
provision orany services that are the subject of this Agreement.
13. Mandated Reporting. Instructor recognizes and acknowledges that personsunder the age of
18 may participate in classes/activities to be conducted by Instructor pursuant to this Agreement. Instructor
further recognizes and acknowledges that if any personunder theage of 18 does, in fact, participate in said
classes/activities, then Instructor is deemed to be a "Mandated Reporter" pursuant to the California Child Abuse
and Neglect Reporting Act (Penal Code §§ 11164-11174.3) ("CANRA"). Concurrently withthe execution of this
Agreement and pursuant to Penal Codesection 11166.5, Instructor has been provided with, and has executed,
an Acknowledgement of MandatedRequirements, Receiptof Training, and Receipt of Penal CodeStatutes,
which acknowledgement shall be maintained by the City during the term of this Agreement.
If the Instructor has employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents, and those employees, subcontractors,
volunteers, and agents will come into contact with minors on a regular basis, those employees must also follow
the Mandated Reporter requirements. Instructorswho have employees will be required to execute an
Acknowledgement and Release of Information, which acknowledgement shall be maintained by the Cityduring
theterm of this Agreement.
14. TB Test Requirements. If the Services include contact with minors, Instructor shall produce a
certificate, issued by a licensed physician or otherauthorized agency, showing that withinthe lasttwo years the
Instructor has been examined and has been found to be free of communicable tuberculosis (TB). If the
Instructor has employees, those employees mustalso follow the TB requirements set forth in this Agreement.
Instructors who have employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents will be required to execute an
Acknowledgement and Release of Information, which acknowledgement shall be maintained by the City during
the termof this Agreement.
15. Fingerprint Requirements. If class/program is open to youth under the age of 18 years,
Instructor and any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents of the Instructor agrees to fulfill all
fingerprint/background checks prior to the firstclass. Instructor and the Instructor's employees, subcontractors,
volunteers, and agents, if any, arenot eligible to work until the clearance is received from the Department of
Justice and Instructor has been notified by a Parks &Community ServicesDepartment representative.
16. Transporting Participants. Instructor or any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and
agents shall not transport any participant in his/her own vehicle. Transportation is the responsibility of the
program participant.
17. Termination. City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon written
notification to Instructor. Instructor maycancel this Agreement upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other
Parties and shall include in such notice the reasons for cancellation. City will pay Instructorforservices
completed perthe Agreement up to the time of termination, if the Services have been completed in accordance
with the Agreement.
In addition, if the Instructor is convicted of any crime or offense, fails or refuses to comply withthe
written policies or reasonable directiveof City, is guiltyof serious misconduct in connection with performance
hereunder, or materially breachesprovisions of this Agreement, Cityat anytime may terminate the engagement
ofthe Instructor immediately and without writtennotice to the Instructor.
Agreement for Contract Instructor Services
4.4.c
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
By signing this Agreement, Instructor agrees it may be subject tocivil penalties for the filing of false
claims as set forth in the California FalseClaims Act, Government Code sections 12650, et seq.
18. Severability. If any term orportion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise
unenforceable by a court of competentjurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in
full force and effect.
19. Governing Law. The laws of the State of Californiawill govern this Agreement.
20. Compliance with Applicable Laws. Instructor will comply with all applicable local, state and
federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, thoseprohibiting discrimination and harassment and
will obtain and maintain a City of Dublin BusinessLicense for theterm of this Agreement.
21. Licenses. Ifa license (e.g. franchise names or trademarks) of any kind, which term is intended
to include evidence of registration, is required of Instructor orany of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers,
or agents by federal orstate law, Instructorwarrantsthat such license has been obtained, is valid and in good
standing, and Instructor shall keep it in effect at all times duringtheterm of this Agreement, and that any
applicable bond has been posted in accordance withall applicable laws and regulations.
22. Venue. In the event that either party bringsany action against the otherunder this Agreement,
the parties agree that trialof such action will be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County
of Alameda or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
23. Agreement Administration and Notice. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of
theCity by the City Manager or designee. Any written notice between theParties shall be sent to:
Mailing Address: Mailing Address:
City of Dublin Edge Gymnastic Training Center, LLC
Attn: Parks and Community Services Director Attn: Kristin Schrader-Shawler
100 Civic Plaza 6780 SierraCt., Suite K
Dublin, CA 94568 Dublin, Ca 94568
Phone: (925)833-6645 Phone: 1-925-479-9904
24. Integration. This Agreement, together with Schedule Summaries as described in Section 7
represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and the Instructor and supersedes all prior
negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral.
25. Amendments. The parties may amend this Agreement only by a writing signed byall the
parties.
26. No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver ofperformance or any breach of a specific
provisionof this Agreement doesnot constitute a waiverof any other breach of that term or any other term of
this Agreement.
27. Survival. All obligations arisingprior to the terminationof this Agreement and all the provisions
of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Instructor will survive the termination of this agreement.
CITY: INSTRUCTOR/BUSINESS:
By: By:4iiJamesM. Rodems,
Parks and Community Services Director Printed Name:
Title: V44
Agreement for Contract Instructor Services
4.4.c
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
I_MPLI]YER.a
Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability
Insurance Policy
EMPLOYERS PREFERRED INS. CO. Policy Number From
olicy Period
To
A Stock Company EIG 2113816 03 1 06109/2017 06/09/2018
12:01A.M.Sta 9V Time at the address of theInsuredasstatedherein
Transaction
RENEWAL DECLARATIONS
NCCI Carrier # 31283 WCIRB CARRIER# 00920 PRIOR POLICY NUMBER EIG21 1 381 602
1. NamedInsured and Address Agent
EDGE GYMNASTICS TRAINING CENTS NORTH RANCH INS SVCS INC 6860001
6780 SIERRA COURT #K 32110 AGOURA RD
DUBLIN CA 94568 WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361
Telephone: 8008012300
Customer# Carrier At FEIN # Risk ID # Entityof Insured
31283 262712914 LIM LIABILITY CO
Additional Locations:
2.The Policy Period is from 06/09/2017 to 06/09/2018 12:01 a.m. Standard Time at the Insured's mailing address.
3. A. Workers Compensation Insurance: Part ONE of the policy applies to the Workers Compensation Law of the states
listed here: CA
B. Employers Liability Insurance: Part TWO of the policy applies to work in each state listed in Item 3A.
The limits of our liability under Part TWO are:
Bodily Injury by Accident $ 1,000,000 each accident
Bodily Injury by Disease $ 1,000,000 policy limit
Bodily Injury by Disease $ 1,000,000 each employee
C. Other States Insurance: Part THREE of the policy applies to the states, if any, listed here:
Allstates except ND, OH, WA, WY, AK, DE, HI, LA, ME, NH, RI, SD, VT, WV and states listed in item
3.A.
D. This policy includes these endorsements and schedules: See attached schedule.
4. The premium for this policy will be determined by our Manuals of Rules, Classifications, Rates, and Rating Plans.
All information required below is subject to verification and change by audit.
SEE EXTENSION OF INFORMATION PAGE
Minimum Premium 750 Expense Constant $ 220
Premium Discount $
Assessments and Taxes $ Total Estimated AnnualPremium $4,427
This is a Three Year Fixed Rate Policy
Premium Adjustment Period: ® Annual; Semiannual; Quarterly; Monthly
Countersigned this Day of
Issued Date: 05/11/2017 Authorized Representative
Issuing Office EMPLOYERS PREFERRED INS. CO.
7110 NORTH FRESNO STREET, SUITE 250
FRESNO, CA 93720-2999
Issued Date 05/11/2017 INSUREDCOPY
WC990630 (5/98 Ed.)
Page 1 of 2
4.4.c
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
A4CC°R ®CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE
4/19//
22D/
YYYY)
04/19017
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDEDBYTHE POLICIES BELOW.
THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSUREDS), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATEHOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must haveADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on
this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Mass Merchandising
K&K Insurance Group,Inc. ac Na,E t: 1-800-648-6406 FAX
No: 1-260-459-5940
1712 Magnavox Way E-MAIL
Fort Wayne IN 46804 ADDRESS; info @gymnasticsinsurance-kk.com
PRODUCER
CUSTOMER ID:
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC#
INSURED 2000011182 CP#603 INSURER A: Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company 23787
Edge Gymnastics Training Center LLC INSURER B:
DBA:Edge Gymnastics INSURER C:
2240 Camino Ramon INSURER D:
San Ramon,CA 94583 INSURER E:
AMember of the Sports,Leisure&Entertainment RPG INSURER F:
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:2000300122 REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVEBEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM ORCONDITION OF ANYCONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE
ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BYTHE POLICIESDESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALLTHE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF
SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAYHAVEBEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMBSLTRINSDWVDMM/ MM/DD/YYY
A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X 6BMAS0000005930300 12/11/16 12/11/17 EACH OCCURRENCE 1,000,000
12:01 AM 12:01 AM DAMAGE To RENTED 300,000CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES Ea Occurrence
MEDEXP(Any one person) 5,000
PERSONAL&ADV INJURY 1,000,000
GEN'L AGGREGATELIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE 5,000,000
POLICY F—]PROJECT F—]LOC PRODUCTS–COMP/OP AGG 1,000,000
OTHER: PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY 1,000,000
LEGAL LIAB TO PARTICIPANTS 1,000,000
A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 6BMAS0000005930300 12/11/16 12111/17 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT(Ea 1,000,000
12:01 AM 12:01 AM
accident
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person)
OWNED SCHEDULED
AUTOS ONLYAUTOS BODILY INJURY(Per accident)
X HIRED X NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE
AUTOS ONLYAUTOS ONLY Per accident
X Not provided while in Hawaii
UMBRE
LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
EXCESS LIAR CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE
RED RETENTION
WORKERS COMPENSATION N/A PER STATUTE OTHERANDEMPLOYERS'LIABILITY
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/ Y/N E.L.EACH ACCIDENT
EXECUTIVE OFFICERIMEMBER
EXCLUDED?(Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE–EA EMPLOYEE
If yes,describeunder
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSbelow E.L.DISEASE–POLICY LIMIT
A MEDICAL PAYMENTS FOR PARTICIPANTS 12/11/1612/11/17 PRIMARYMEDICAL
68MAS0000005930300
12:01 AM 12:01 AM EXCESSMEDICAL 150,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached if morespace is required)
Location:6780 Sierra Ct.,Dublin,CA 94568
Operations:Adult&Child Instructional Gymnastics Classes(Mommy&Me,Parent-Tot,Me&My Grown-Up,etc.),Competitive/Artistic Gymnastics,Pre-School
Gymnastics,Recreational Gymnastics,Trampolines(instruction/training classes/programsonly),Tumbling(floor activity only),On-site Birthday and/or Social
parties with apparatus use,On-site OpenGym/ParentsNight Out/Special Events,Members+non-members,On-site Camps/Clinics.
Sexual Abuse or Sexual Molestation Liability-$1,000,000 Each Occurrence(included above)/$1,000,000 Aggregate(included above)
The certificate holder is added as an additional insured,but only for liability caused,in wholeor in part,by the acts or omissions of thenamed insured
This certificate voids and replaces certificate#2000283743"
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
City of Dublin and its elected officials,officers,employees,agents and SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBEDPOLICIESBE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
volunteers EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
100 CivicPlaza THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
Dublin,CA94568
Co-promoter
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
C 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
Coverage is only extended to U.S.events and activities.
NOTICE TO TEXASINSUREDS:The Insurer for the purchasing groupmay not be subject to all the insurance laws and regulationsof theState of Texas.
ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
4.4.c
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
POLICY NUMBER: 6BMAS0000005930300 INTERLINE
IL 12 01 11 85
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
POLICY CHANGES
Policy Change
Number 1
POLICY NUMBER POLICY CHANGES EFFECTIVE COMPANY
6BMAS0000005930300 12/11/16 Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
NAMEDINSURED AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE
Edge Gymnastics Training Center LLC K&K InsuranceGroup, Inc.
DBA: Edge Gymnastics
COVERAGE PARTS AFFECTED
COMMERCIAL GENERALLIABILITY COVERAGE
CHANGES
Theattached form CG2026replacesthe previously issued CG2026.
C P#603
AuthorizedRepresentativeSignature
IL 12 01 11 85 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1983 Page 1 of 1
Copyright, ISO Commercial Risk Services, Inc., 1983
4.4.c
Packet Pg. 42
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
POLICY NUMBER: 6BMAS0000005930300 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CG20 2604 13
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - DESIGNATED
PERSON OR ORGANIZATION
This endorsement modifies insurance providedunder the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
SCHEDULE
Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s)
City of Dublin and its electedofficials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers
100 CivicPlaza
Dublin, CA 94568
NamedInsured: Edge Gymnastics TrainingCenter LLC
CP#603
Informationrequired to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, willbe shown in the Declarations.
A. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these
include as an additional insured the person(s) or additionalinsureds, the following is added to Section
organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with III—Limits Of Insurance:
respect to liability for "bodilyinjury", "property If coverage provided to the additional insured is
damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused, required by a contract or agreement, the most we willinwholeorinpart, by your acts or omissions or the payon behalf of the additional insured is the amount
acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf: of insurance:
1. In the performance of your ongoing operations; 1. Required by the contract or agreement; or
or
2. In connection with your premises owned by or
2. Available under the applicable Limits of
Insuranceshown in the Declarations;
rented to you.
However:
whichever is less.
1. The insurance afforded to such additional
This endorsement shall not increase the applicable
insured only applies to the extent permitted by
Limits of Insuranceshown in the Declarations.
law; and
2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is
required by a contract or agreement, the
insurance afforded to such additionalinsured will
not be broader than that which you are required
by the contract or agreement to provide for such
additional insured.
CG 2026 04 13 Insurance Services Office, Inc.,2012 Page 1 of 1
4.4.c
Packet Pg. 43
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
E
d
g
e
G
y
m
n
a
s
t
i
c
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
J
AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT INSTRUCTOR SERVICES
Make Me a Pro Sports
This Agreement for Contract Instructor Services ("Agreement") is made and entered into as ofthe 1st
day of September, 2017, by and between theCity of Dublin, a municipalcorporation ofthe State of California
City") and Make Me a Pro Sports ("Instructor"), together(the"Parties") in Dublin, California. In consideration of
their mutual covenants, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Scope of Work. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Instructor shall provide
basketball and cheerleading sport classes and activities.
2. Location of Work. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Instructor will
provide services and/or class instruction (check one box):
Offsite: At his/her/their own facility, located off-premises from anyCity-owned facility
located at.
9 Onsite:At a City-owned facility.
3.Independent Contractor. At all times duringthe term of this Agreement, Instructor, and
any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents shall be independentcontractors and not
employees or agents of the City. Instructor and any of its employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agents
shall have no authority, express or implied, to bind the Cityto anyobligation whatsoever. Notwithstanding any
other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Instructor and anyof its
employees, subcontractors, volunteers, and agentsproviding services under this Agreement shall not qualify for
or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any and all claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any
incident ofemployment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees
Retirement System (CaIPERS) as an employeeof Cityand entitlement to any contribution tobe paid by City for
employercontributions and/or employee contributions for CalPERSbenefits.
4. Term of Performance. Unless earlier terminated, this Agreement will be effective fromthedate
first above written through December 31, 2018. Upon mutual agreement the City and Instructor shall have the
option to extend the term of this Agreement for two (2) additional terms of one (1) year ("Extension Term") upon
the same terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, subject to the City Council appropriation offunds. All
terms and conditions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect during the Extension Term, except as
otherwise agreed through a formal Amendment as required in Section 25. Nothing in this paragraph shall alter
City's right to terminate Agreement as described in Section 17, at any point throughout the Extension Term.
This Agreement does not guarantee that any course, program or activity will be added to the City's public
recreation offerings duringtheTerm of Performance.
5. Standard of Performance. Instructor will perform all services required pursuant to this
Agreement.
6.Permission. Instructor grants full permission to the Cityof Dublin for use of his/her name and
photographs, videos, motion pictures or recordings for any publicity and promotion purposeswithout obligation
or liability to Instructor.
7. Payment Terms. For the services described in Section 1 above, the City agrees to pay
Instructor 60% of the resident rate for each participant, which amount shall include all expenses. Except as
specifically authorized by City, Instructor shall not bill City forduplicate services performed by more than one
person (reasonable quality control and assurance work as generallyrecognized as an acceptable practice in this
field is expected). Instructor understands that any time a participant requests a refund or credit, that amount will
be reduced from the gross revenue on which Instructor's payment is calculated.
Instructor understands and agreesthat Instructor will complete and submit a Contract Instructor Course
Agreement for Contract Instructor Services
4.4.d
Packet Pg. 44
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
C
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
M
a
k
e
M
e
a
P
r
o
S
p
o
r
t
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
4.4.e
Packet Pg. 45
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
D
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
K
i
d
z
L
o
v
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
4.4.e
Packet Pg. 46
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
D
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
K
i
d
z
L
o
v
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
4.4.e
Packet Pg. 47
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
D
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
K
i
d
z
L
o
v
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
4.4.e
Packet Pg. 48
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
D
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
K
i
d
z
L
o
v
e
S
o
c
c
e
r
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
o
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Military Discount at The Wave
Prepared by: Micki Cronin, Asst. Director of Parks and Community Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approval of a military discount for veterans, reservist and
active duty members of the military, as recommended by the Federal and Military
Communities Committee, and approve an associated amendment to the Master Fee
Schedule.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Amending the Master Fee Schedule to Include a Military
Discount to The Wave Entrance Fee.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
It is currently unknown what visitation will look like and will take a season of offering this
discount in order to provide analysis as to the financial impact of this rate.
DESCRIPTION:
The Federal and Military Communities Committee, comprised of Vice Mayor Biddle and
Councilmember Hernandez, received a report from Staff on military discount options at
The Wave Waterpark. After discussion at its most recent meeting of December 19,
2017, the Committee recommended that the City establish a military discount for
entrance to The Wave at Emerald Glen Park. The non-resident/resident rate charged in
summer 2017 was $17/$13 for a full day and $15/$11 for a half day. The proposal is to
offer a $10 discounted rate for military personnel, effective in May 2018, which would
extend to veterans, reservists, active duty military personnel of all branches of the
military, and up to three of their guests.
4.5
Packet Pg. 49
Page 2 of 2
Discount Requirements
The veteran, reservist or active duty member must provide a valid military ID at the time
of purchase. Tickets must be purchased in person at the Waterpark. Online purchases
for the discounted rate will not be permitted.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Amending the Master Fee Schedule to Include a Military Discount to The
Wave Entrance Fee
4.5
Packet Pg. 50
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. XX - 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
AMENDING THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE A
MILITARY DISCOUNT TO THE WAVE ENTRANCE FEE
WHEREAS, the California Constitution authorizes local government to recover the reasonable
costs of providing services; and
WHEREAS, the City processes various permits, applications, and licenses, and offers various
recreational program and facility rental opportunities; and
WHEREAS, on September 4, 2012 the City Council approved Resolution 160-12 Establishing
a User Fee Cost Recovery Policy that specifies annual adjustments to fees for services provided by
the City; and
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2017 the City Council approved Resolution 104-17 amending the
Master Fee schedule to include Parks and Community Services fees for FY 2017-18; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to offer a discounted entry fee to The Wave for active military
members, veterans, and reservists, as well as three of their guests.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby
approve amending the Master Fee Schedule to include this item.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the new fee identified in the Master Fee Schedule shall be
effective May 2018.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January 2018, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
4.5.a
Packet Pg. 51
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
M
a
s
t
e
r
F
e
e
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
t
o
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
D
i
s
c
o
u
n
t
t
o
T
h
e
W
a
v
e
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
F
e
e
(
T
h
e
W
a
v
e
W
a
t
e
r
p
a
r
k
-
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Request for Waiver of Competitive Bid Process and Authorization to
Purchase Fire Apparatus through Cooperative Purchasing Program
Contracts and Sole Source the Outfitting of the Apparatus Units to the
Alameda County Fire Department
Prepared by: Lisa Hisatomi, Assistant Administrative Services
Director/Budget
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider waiving the competitive bid requirement and approving
the purchase of two replacement fire engines through cooperative purchasing
agreements, and the outfitting of the units by the Alameda County Fire Department
(ACFD) as a sole source provider.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Waiving the Competitive Bid Process and Approving the
Purchase of Two Fire Engines Through Cooperative Purchasing Contracts, and
Approving the Outfitting of the Fire Engines by the Alameda County Fire Department as
a Sole Source Provider; and approve the budget change.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The replacement and outfitting of the apparatus are included in the Fiscal Year 2017-18
Budget’s Vehicle Internal Service Fund (ISF). However, due to price adjustments by the
apparatus manufacturer and increase in equipment costs, a budget increase of $75,000
is needed to complete the procurement and outfitting of the two apparatus units. There
is no impact on the General Fund as the funds will come from the ISF.
DESCRIPTION:
The City of Dublin owns all the fire apparatus stationed in the City’s three fire stations.
As part of the fire services contract, the Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD)
maintains the City’s fire apparatus fleet. The ACFD routinely reviews the condition of
the City’s fleet to ensure the safety and reliability of the fire apparatus when firefighters
respond to emergency incidents.
4.6
Packet Pg. 52
Page 2 of 3
Based on the ACFD assessment, it is recommended to replace engine #367 in Station
17 and engine #164 in Station 18. The City’s fire apparatus units are custom built to
meet all legal requirements and current National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA)
standards.
Staff recommends that the fire engines requiring replacements be purchased through
cooperative purchasing contracts as follows:
Skeeter Brush Trucks - one Skeeter Dodge Patrol through the HGACBuy
contract (contract #FS12-17.73) to replace engine #367; the contract price for
the unit is $224,947.52 and the contract is valid through November 30, 2019;
Golden State Fire Apparatus (Prime authorized dealer of Pierce Manufacturing)
- one Pierce Arrow XT Pumper through the HGACBuy contract (contract # FS12-
17.65) to replace reserve engine #164; the contractual price for the unit is
$599,680.10 and the contract is valid through November 30, 2019.
Staff also recommends to sole source the outfitting of the fire engines to the ACFD.
This action assures that the units are built and outfitted to the standard specifications of
the other apparatus of the ACFD fleet. The estimated cost for outfitting both apparatus
units is approximately $200,000
Chapter 2.36 of the Dublin Municipal Code establishes the procedures for contract and
purchasing, which requires City Council approval for procurement of goods and services
in excess of $45,000. The City Purchasing Ordinance provides the City Council with
authority to waive the competitive bidding process, as stated in Dublin Municipal Code
Section 2.36.100:
B.9 - “When another public agency has administered a competitive bidding
process and has a current valid agreement for the same or substantially similar
consultant or professional services, general services, supplies or equipment.”
B.4 - “When a contract or purchase involves goods of a technical nature, which it
would be difficult for a vendor to bid on a standard set of specifications.”
The procurement of the fire engines meets the criteria, as HGACBuy has administered
a competitive bidding process and both contracts are valid through November 30, 2019.
In addition, since ACFD performs apparatus repairs and maintenance, the equipment
installation should be done by the ACFD in accordance with their specifications.
The procurement of both units is included in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Budget, however,
a budget adjustment of $75,000 is needed to complete the procurement and outfitting of
the units due to manufacturers’ price adjustments and increases in equipment costs.
When the two new front-line engines are in service, engines #367 and #163 (a reserve
unit) will be retired from the fleet. Unit #164 will be moved to the reserve line.
4.6
Packet Pg. 53
Page 3 of 3
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Waiving the Competitive Bid Process and Approving the Purchase of Two
Fire Engines Through Cooperative Purchasing Contracts
2. Budget Change Form
4.6
Packet Pg. 54
RESOLUTION NO. - 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
***************************
WAIVING THE COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS AND APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF TWO FIRE
ENGINES THROUGH COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROGRAM CONTRACTS, AND
APPROVING THE OUTFITTING OF THE FIRE ENGINES BY THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE
DEPARTMENT AS A SOLE SOURCE PROVIDER
WHEREAS, the City requires the purchase of fire apparatus for fire services operations; and
WHEREAS, the City follows a process of periodically replacing vehicles based upon the age
and condition of the vehicles; and
WHEREAS, appropriations are included in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Vehicle Internal Service
Fund budget for the replacement of fire engines #367 and #163; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36.100(B)(9) of the Dublin Municipal Code allows for an exception to
the competitive bid process when another public agency has administered a competitive bidding
process and has a current valid agreement for the same or substantially similar consultant or
professional services, general services, supplies or equipment; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36.100(B)(4) of the Dublin Municipal Code allows for an exception to
the competitive bid process when a contract or purchase involves goods of a technical nature, which
it would be difficult for a vendor to bid on a standard set of specifications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that significant benefits are possible by authorizing Staff to
replace engine #367 with one fire engine purchased from Skeeter Brush Trucks through the
Cooperative Purchasing Program of the Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments
(HGACBuy), contract #FS12-17.73, and to sole source the outfitting of the apparatus unit to the
Alameda County Fire Department; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that significant benefits are possible by authorizing Staff to
replace reserve engine #164 with one fire engine purchased from Golden State Fire Apparatus, the
prime authorized dealer for Pierce Manufacturing, through the Cooperative Purchasing Program of
the Houston-Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGACBuy), contract # FS12-17.65, and sole
sourcing the outfitting of the apparatus unit to the Alameda County Fire Department; and
WHEREAS, engine #367 (VIN # 1FDAX57P33EB49702) and reserve engine #163 (VIN #
4P1CT02S3WA000331) will be retired from the City’s fleet when the replacement engines are in
service; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby approve the purchase of one fire engine from Skeeter Brush Trucks and one fire engine from
Golden State Fire Apparatus through the cooperative purchasing contracts, the sole source of the
outfitting of the new fire engines to the Alameda County Fire Department, and the surplus of engine
#367 and reserve engine #163.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 2018.
4.6.a
Packet Pg. 55
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
W
a
i
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
B
i
d
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
T
w
o
F
i
r
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
s
T
h
r
o
u
g
h
C
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
City Clerk
4.6.a
Packet Pg. 56
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
W
a
i
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
B
i
d
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
T
w
o
F
i
r
e
E
n
g
i
n
e
s
T
h
r
o
u
g
h
C
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
G:\Budget Changes\10_2017-18\CC\08_Fire Apparatus_010918 08_Fire Apparatus_010918
Budget Change Reference #:
From Un-Appropriated Reserves X Budget Transfer Between Funds
From Designated Reserves Other
Account Amount
6105.1905.72106 $75,000.00
1/9/2018
Posted By:Date:
As Presented at the City Council Meeting
**********Finance Use Only**********
CITY OF DUBLIN
Fire apparatus manufacturer price adjustments and increase in equipment costs for replacements of unit 164 and unit 367
REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE
FISCAL YEAR 2017-18
BUDGET CHANGE FORM
ISF Vehicle Replacement - Non-Dept - Fire Apparatus
City Council's Approval Required
4.6.b
Packet Pg. 57
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
B
u
d
g
e
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
F
o
r
m
(
W
a
i
v
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
B
i
d
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
F
i
r
e
A
p
p
a
r
a
t
u
s
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
)
Page 1 of 1
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Approval of Calendar for Development of Fiscal Years 2018 -19 and 2019-
20 Budget
Prepared by: Colleen Tribby, Director of Administrative Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approval of a calendar of key dates to guide the
development of the City’s Fiscal Years 2018-19 and 2019-20 Budget Update.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the budget calendar.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Approval of the budget calendar does not result in any direct fiscal impact.
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council is required to adopt an annual budget and accompanying documents
before the July 1 start of the new fiscal year. Staff proposes the following schedule of
key dates guiding the Fiscal Years 2018-19 and 2019-20 budget process:
Budget Study Session - March 20, 2018
Budget Adoption - May 15, 2018
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
4.7
Packet Pg. 58
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers
Prepared by: Veronica Briggs, Senior Finance Technician
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from December 1, 2017 -
December 31, 2017 totaling $3,212,054.10.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUMMARY OF PAYMENTS ISSUED
December 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017
Total Number of Payments: 274
Total Amount of Payments: $3,212,054.10
DESCRIPTION:
The Payment Issuance Report (Attachment 1) provides a listing of all payments for the
period beginning December 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. This report is
provided in accordance with the policy adopted November 15, 2011 in Resolution
No.189-11. The listing of payments has been reviewed in accordance with the policies
for processing payments and expenditures.
The City’s practice of reporting payments to the City Council after the payments have
been made is in compliance with California Government Code Sections 37208 (b) and
(c), which allow for an agency to make payments without first being audited by the
legislative body, as long as such payments are: 1) conforming to a budget approved by
ordinance or resolution of the legislative body; and 2) presented to the legislative body
for ratification and approval in the form of an audited comprehensive annual financial
report.
4.8
Packet Pg. 59
Page 2 of 2
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Payment Issuance Report-December 2017
4.8
Packet Pg. 60
Page 1 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
12/01/2017 CAL PERS 72,812.14 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 11/24/17
12/01/2017 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 17,034.51 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 11/24/17
12/01/2017 I C M A 401 PLAN 895.00 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 11/24/17
12/01/2017 I C M A 457 PLAN 24,642.95 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 11/24/17
12/01/2017 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 60,122.16 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 11/24/17
12/01/2017 US BANK - PARS 3,077.91 PARS: PE 11/24/17
12/01/2017 WAGEWORKS, INC. 3,521.90 WAGEWORKS 2017: PE 11/24/17
Payments Issued 12/1/2017 Total: 182,106.57
12/04/2017 4 PAWS GOOSE CONTROL, INC 1,000.00 GEESE CONTROL SERVICES OCT 2017
12/04/2017 4LEAF INC. 134,698.50 INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SERVICES OCT 2017 526.50 INSPECTION SERVICES OCT 2017
Check Total: 135,225.00
12/04/2017 ALEX, ROSEMARY 1,244.99 REIMB LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CONF EXPENSES
12/04/2017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC 9,043.20 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES - 10/22/17 TO 11/4/17 9,008.72 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES - 10/8/17 TO 10/21/17
Check Total: 18,051.92
12/04/2017 AMERICAN VALLEY WASTE OIL 134.75 ELEVATOR WATER WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES
12/04/2017 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 95.18 MAT SERVICE-CIVIC CENTER 56.00 MAT SERVICE-CORP YARD 74.06 MAT SERVICE-SENIOR CENTER 33.78 MAT SERVICE-SHANNON CENTER
Check Total: 259.02
12/04/2017 BAY ALARM COMPANY 95.00 ALARM SERVICES-HERITAGE BARN REPAIR
12/04/2017 BAY ISLAND OFFICIAL ASSOC 684.00 SPORTS OFFICIATING SERVICES
12/04/2017 BIG O TIRES #7 530.26 POLICE VEHICLE TIRE INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE
12/04/2017 BKF ENGINEERS 29,111.41 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY DUBLIN BLVD EXT
12/04/2017 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXICOLOGY 895.00 POLICE LAB TESTING SERVICES OCT 2017
12/04/2017 CHAN, ROSA 290.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/04/2017 CHECKERS CATERING 979.10 INSIDE DUBLIN GRADUATION RECEPTION
12/04/2017 CHEN, CHIH YUN 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
12/04/2017 CINTAS CORP 64.18 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES
12/04/2017 COIT SERVICES, INC. 250.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES-THE WAVE 734.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES-SHANNON CENTER
Check Total: 984.00
12/04/2017 CONNAUGHTON, JUDITH A. 696.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/04/2017 CONSTANT CONTACT, INC. 1,890.00 MARKETING SERVICES FOR EMAIL CONTACTS
12/04/2017 CORWOOD CAR WASH, INC. 1,090.00 CITY CAR WASHES JUL-OCT 2017
12/04/2017 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 115.00 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LICENSE RENEWAL-HUISINGH
12/04/2017 DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 9,311.25 THE WAVE INSPECTION FEE
12/04/2017 DKS ASSOCIATES 4,960.00 SHARED PARKING ANALY SIS FOR SUTTER DEVELOPMENT
12/04/2017 DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL 1,365.00 HOLIDAY TEA EVENT CATERING
12/04/2017 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 10,722.50 PLANNING SERVICES OCT 2017
12/04/2017 FALLON, DEBORAH P. 60.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/04/2017 FIRST CARBON SOLUTIONS 21,385.00 PLANNING SERVICES-IKEA PROJECT EIR OCT 2017
12/04/2017 FLAG COMPANY, THE 1,254.19 U.S. AND CA FLAGS FOR CITY FACILITIES
12/04/2017 GOLDEN STATE FLEET SVCS INC 100.00 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/04/2017 GOODWIN CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 2,487.50 DUBLIN CFD FORMATION SVCS JUL & AUG 2017
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 61
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 2 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
12/04/2017 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 2,359.70 POLICE VEHICLE TIRES & SPARES
12/04/2017 GRADETECH INC. 440,785.08 SHANNON CENTER PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
12/04/2017 HAAG, JERRY P 1,000.00 CEQA DOCS TASSAJARA PRECISE PLAN
12/04/2017 HARPER, CPA & ASSOCIATES, KEVIN W 1,760.00 DOCUMENT FINANCIAL POLICIES OCT 2017
12/04/2017 HAYWARD RUBBER STAMP CO INC 67.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES
12/04/2017 HOME DEPOT USA, INC. 212.40 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEES
12/04/2017 HU, XIN 250.00 CIVIC CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
12/04/2017 ICLEI-LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 1,200.00 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY DUES
12/04/2017 IMAGEX 540.54 STAGE SUPPLIES FOR TREE LIGHTENING
12/04/2017 INDEPENDENT, THE 1,350.00 WELCOME DUBLIN MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
12/04/2017 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 426.08 BUILDING CODE BOOKS
12/04/2017 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 55.00 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP-SHREEVE
12/04/2017 IRON MOUNTAIN 285.05 POLICE RECORDS STORAGE
12/04/2017 JOCHNER, RICH 84.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2017
12/04/2017 KAPADIA, MARIA 399.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/04/2017 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC 3,757.50 FISCAL ANALYSIS ON IKEA RETAIL CENTER PROJECT
12/04/2017 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 14,639.58 CEQA ANALYSIS-CARL ZEISS PROJECT OCT 2017 2,353.10 CEQA ANALYSIS-DUBLIN STATION SITE A-3 OCT 2017
Check Total: 16,992.68
12/04/2017 KING, ARTHUR SCOTT 172.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/04/2017 KLEIST-CORWIN, JULAINA 336.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/04/2017 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS 266.60 DATABASE SEARCHES - OCT 2017
12/04/2017 LI, ZHEN ZHEN 4,074.37 REFUND DEVELOPER DEPOSIT
12/04/2017 LIVERMORE AUTO GROUP 2,750.51 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/04/2017 MAKE ME A PRO SPORTS 2,435.40 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/04/2017 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC. 1,500.00 FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY TASK FORCE COORDINATION
12/04/2017 MINUTEMAN PRESS 339.81 CRIME PREVENTION PROMOTIONAL ITEMS
12/04/2017 OFFICE RELIEF 3,150.42 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
12/04/2017 ONE WORKPLACE L. FERRARI LLC 589.92 OFFICE FURNITURE
12/04/2017 PHOENIX GROUP INFO SYS. 226.55 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING OCT 2017 191.70 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING SEPT 2017
Check Total: 418.25
12/04/2017 PURSUIT NORTH 300.00 POLICE VEHICLE GRAPHICS INSTALLATION 125.04 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
Check Total: 425.04
12/04/2017 RAYNE OF SAN JOSE 144.65 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES F/S #16 163.80 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES F/S #17 121.80 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES F/S #18
Check Total: 430.25
12/04/2017 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP 10,928.09 PLANNING SERVICES OCT 2017
12/04/2017 SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR SVC INC 315.00 ELEVATOR SERVICE NOV 2017
12/04/2017 SAN RAMON VALLEY OFFICIALS AS 728.00 ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIATING SERVICES
12/04/2017 SELECT IMAGING 41.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES
12/04/2017 SHAMROCK OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC 54.77 COPIES OCT 2017 1,727.20 PRINTER OVERAGES 7/22/17 - 10/21/17
Check Total: 1,781.97
12/04/2017 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC 1,870.00 INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SERVICES OCT 2017
12/04/2017 SIMPLER SYSTEMS, INC 1,500.00 SOFTWARE LICENSING NOV 2017
12/04/2017 SKYHAWKS EAST BAY 1,984.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 62
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 3 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
12/04/2017 STONERIDGE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE 4,036.36 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/04/2017 TRB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 8,700.00 INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SERVICES OCT 2017
12/04/2017 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 2,016.50 PARKING CITATIONS COLLECTED OCT 2017 1,858.00 PARKING CITATIONS COLLECTED SEPT 2017
Check Total: 3,874.50
12/04/2017 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 14,172.40 SIGNAL & STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE
12/04/2017 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 599.07 EXTRA JANITORIAL SERVICES-SENIOR CENTER 1,060.57 EXTRA JANITORIAL SERVICES-SHANNON CENTER 800.00 EXTRA JANITORIAL SERVICES-THE WAVE 59.28 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-HERITAGE PARK 408.06 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-LIBRARY LOBBY 164.65 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-LIBRARY MAIN LOBBY 264.78 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-SENIOR CENTER 432.68 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-SHANNON CENTER 177.84 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES-THE WAVE
Check Total: 3,966.93
12/04/2017 TYCO INTEGRATED SECURITY LLC 343.27 FIRE ALARM MONITORING SVCS-CIVIC CENTER 833.64 FIRE ALARM MONITORING SVCS-LIBRARY 699.66 FIRE ALARM MONITORING SVCS-PS COMPLEX
Check Total: 1,876.57
12/04/2017 TYLER BUSINESS FORMS 744.87 TAX FORMS & ENVELOPES
12/04/2017 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 86,739.71 EDEN ANNUAL SOFTWARE SUPPORT
12/04/2017 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 630.85 DISPOSAL SERVICES NOV 2017
12/04/2017 UNIVAR USA INC 522.66 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE
12/04/2017 VALENTIN, M. 85.80 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/04/2017 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATES INC 29,376.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES JUL 2017
12/04/2017 VALLEY WINDOW CLEANING INC 240.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES-THE WAVE
12/04/2017 VALLEYCARE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 90.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL SCREENING
12/04/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS 1,611.77 POLICE CELL PHONE SERVICE TO 11/03/17
12/04/2017 WAGEWORKS, INC. 554.00 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT FEES NOV 2017
12/04/2017 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 9,842.75 FLOOR SCUBBING MACHINES FOR THE WAVE
12/04/2017 WC3-WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANT 22,320.00 INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SERVICES OCT 2017
12/04/2017 WEISS, ROBIN S. 534.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
Payments Issued 12/4/2017 Total: 943,218.55
12/05/2017 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC. 3,200.00 THE WAVE WATER PARK LOOPS
Payments Issued 12/5/2017 Total: 3,200.00
12/07/2017 UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA 11,129.57 LIFE AND AD&D PREMIUM - DECEMBER 2017
Payments Issued 12/7/2017 Total: 11,129.57
12/08/2017 DSRSD 14,130.03 SERVICE TO 11/14/2017
12/08/2017 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 98.79 AFTER SCHOOL REC SUPPLIES 279.04 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN CONF EXPENSES-BAKER
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 63
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 4 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
400.00 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSN CONF REG-4 ATTENDEES 124.00 CLIPPER CARD RELOAD-HAUBERT 1,198.64 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 3,698.48 DIGITAL PLAN CHECK SOFTWARE LICENSES 1,045.73 ENERGY & CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE EXP-PARNES 227.96 FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY TASK FORCE SUPPLIES 633.77 HERITAGE CENTER & MUSEUM SUPPLIES 458.99 HERITAGE CENTER SUPPLIES 400.00 HOUSING CONFERENCE REG-SIMS 849.96 ICMA CONFERENCE REG-TRIBBY 348.75 INFORMATION FAIR SUPPLIES 912.58 INSIDE DUBLIN SUPPLIES 51.00 INTERVIEW PANEL SUPPLIES 1,558.51 LANDSCAPING ASSN CONFERENCE EXP-ALEX 149.33 NAT'L REC & PARK ASSN CONFERENCE EXP-RODEMS 986.41 OFFICE CHAIRS 1,756.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT & STORM DRAIN MARKERS 440.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,155.21 POLICE SUPPLIES 802.63 PRINTING SVCS FOR FALL & WINTER EVENTS 115.43 PUBLIC ART MEETING SUPPLIES 2,176.56 STAFF UNIFORMS, WATERPARK ASSN CONF-SANDHOLM 893.08 RECREATION SUPPLIES -67.98 RETURN ADULT BOCCE SUPPLIES 1,266.36 SAFETY & DISASTER PREPAREDNESS WEEK SUPPLIES 833.73 SAFETY & DISASTER WEEK SUPPLIES 2,328.20 SAFETY WEEK & EOC SUPPLIES 230.00 ICMA CONFERENCE EXPENSE -TRIBBY 257.50 SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 6.76 SENIOR CENTER SUPPLIES 1,885.41 SHANNON CENTER & PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES 139.52 SHANNON CENTER SUPPLIES 238.00 THE WAVE PARTY PACKAGE SUPPLIES 1,090.00 TRANSPORTATION MANUALS 488.00 THE WAVE FIRST AID & OPERATING SUPPLIES 804.04 WORLD WATERPARK ASSN CONFERENCE EXP-CRONIN
Check Total: 30,261.48
Payments Issued 12/8/2017 Total: 44,391.51
12/13/2017 ALLIANT INSURANCE SVCS INC 6,733.00 FACILITY RENTAL INSURANCE APR-JUN 2017
12/13/2017 AMERICAN PAVEMENT SYSTEMS INC. 35,617.31 RETENTION RELEASE-2017 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT
12/13/2017 AMP PRINTING, INC. 167.22 BUSINESS CARDS
12/13/2017 ANANTHAN, STEFANIE 12.04 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2017
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 64
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 5 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
16.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT OCT 2017
Check Total: 28.89
12/13/2017 ARLEN NESS, INC. 500.00 REFUND TEMPORARY USE PERMIT DEPOSIT
12/13/2017 BAST, DIANE 28.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT OCT 2017
12/13/2017 BROOKFIELD HOMES 250,584.80 REFUND CASH COMPLETION BONDS
12/13/2017 BSN SPORTS, INC. 150.74 RECREATION SUPPLIES
12/13/2017 BUGARIN, CORA 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
12/13/2017 BYOG 379.88 RECREATION SUPPLIES
12/13/2017 CALIFORNIA BANK OF COMMERCE 11,078.08 RETENTION DEPOSIT-DOUGHERTY RD IMPROV PROJECT
12/13/2017 CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY SERVICES 225.00 CA EMERGENCY SERVICES ASSN DUES-CARTER
12/13/2017 CHING, ERWIN 48.15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2017
12/13/2017 CHINN, AVA YEE 421.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/13/2017 DESILVA GATES CONSTRUCTION LP 211,383.54 CONSTRUCTION SVCS-DOUGHERTY RD IMPROV PROJECT
12/13/2017 DOCTORS GIVING BACK 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
12/13/2017 DU-ALL SAFETY, LLC 2,175.00 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUSINESS PLANS
12/13/2017 EVENT EQUIPMENT SALES, LLC 16,077.81 SHANNON CENTER DANCE FLOOR
12/13/2017 FLORES, VIRGINIA 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
12/13/2017 HATZIKOKOLAKIS, JACQUI 18.14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2017
12/13/2017 HERITAGE PARK RESIDENTIAL 250.00 HERITAGE PARK RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
12/13/2017 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 112.85 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES NOV 2017
12/13/2017 LUMBANG, SHERWIN 547.50 AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM WITHDRAWAL REFUND
12/13/2017 MCPHERSON, LISA 114.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT-OCT 2017
12/13/2017 MEYERS NAVE 8,546.00 LEGAL SERVICES SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD
12/13/2017 NATIONAL AQUATIC SAFETY CO LLC 3,620.00 LIFEGUARD AUDITING SERVICES
12/13/2017 PARNES, REBECCA 237.32 REIMB ENERGY & CLIMATE CHANGE CONF EXP-PARNES
12/13/2017 PHILLIPS, TYLER 20.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2017
12/13/2017 PROSCH, VALERIE 475.00 SENIOR CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
12/13/2017 SF ART CONSERVATION 6,615.00 PUBLIC ART MAINTENANCE & REPAIR
12/13/2017 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 1,247.50 CUSTOMER SERVICE TRAINING FOR REC STAFF
12/13/2017 SMITH, JENNIFER 31.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2017
12/13/2017 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC. 21,708.45 DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING RULE 20A CONSTRUCTION
12/13/2017 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 55,115.57 POLICE DISPATCH TRUE-UP COSTS
12/13/2017 WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL 500.00 REFUND TEMPORARY USE PERMIT DEPOSIT
12/13/2017 WOLFPACK GEAR, INC. 5,026.94 WATERSLIDE ROPE ACCESS EQUIPMENT
Payments Issued 12/13/2017 Total: 642,034.94
12/15/2017 CAL PERS 72,401.80 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 12/8/17
12/15/2017 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 19,569.28 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 12/8/17
12/15/2017 I C M A 401 PLAN 895.00 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 12/8/17
12/15/2017 I C M A 457 PLAN 28,115.67 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 12/8/17
12/15/2017 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 72,690.17 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 12/8/17
12/15/2017 US BANK - PARS 3,650.32 PARS: PE 12/8/17
12/15/2017 WAGEWORKS, INC. 4,421.90 WAGEWORKS 2017: PE 12/8/17
Payments Issued 12/15/2017 Total: 201,744.14
12/19/2017 3I ADVERTISING, LLC. 1,114.25 ADVERTISING & MARKETING FOR THE WAVE
12/19/2017 4LEAF INC. 540.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017
12/19/2017 ACCOPSA -ALAMEDA COUNTY CHIEFS 900.00 POLICE POST EXECUTIVE SEMINAR 2018-HOLMES
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 65
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 6 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
12/19/2017 ADVANCED INTEGRATED PEST 945.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICES NOV 2017
12/19/2017 AMY'S ENGRAVED SIGNS & AWARDS 158.41 EMPLOYEE NAMPLATES/ADA SIGNS-COLES, WISEMAN 12/19/2017 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 28.00 MAT SERVICE-CORP YARD 16.89 MAT SERVICE-SHANNON CENTER
Check Total: 44.89
12/19/2017 AT&T - CALNET 3 37.33 SERVICE TO 11/1/17 1,186.37 SERVICE TO 11/12/17 484.07 SERVICE TO 11/14/17 44.65 SERVICE TO 11/6/17
Check Total: 1,752.42
12/19/2017 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 256.50 LEGAL NOTICES - NOV 2017
12/19/2017 BPXPRESS 818.78 PRINTING SERVICES-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
12/19/2017 CAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY INC 36,866.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017
12/19/2017 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 8,302.00 MICROSOFT WINDOWS VIRTUAL DESKTOP LICENSES
12/19/2017 COIT SERVICES, INC. 734.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES-SHANNON CENTER
12/19/2017 CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES 16,484.91 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES NOV 2017
12/19/2017 CSG CONSULTANTS INC 20,473.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017
12/19/2017 DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. 274.71 GREASE TRAP SERVICING-SENIOR CENTER
12/19/2017 DENALECT ALARM COMPANY 306.00 QUARTERLY ALARM CHARGE F/S#18
12/19/2017 DIABLO VALLEY COLLEGE FOOD SVC 346.60 TEAM DUBLIN HOLIDAY PIE SALES
12/19/2017 DU-ALL SAFETY, LLC 362.50 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BUSINESS PLAN UPDATE 580.00 SAFETY CONSULTING SERVICES NOV 2017
Check Total: 942.50
12/19/2017 DUBLIN HIGH SCHOOL BAND 3,804.00 BREAKFAST WITH SANTA PAYMENT
12/19/2017 DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 938.89 STAGER GYM DSRSD WATER/SEWER USAGE JUN 2017 938.89 STAGER GYM DSRSD WATER/SEWER USAGE JUL 2017 842.33 STAGER GYM UTILITIES ELECTRIC 07/13/17-08/13/17 1,683.71 STAGER GYM UTILITIES ELECTRIC 08/14/17-09/12/17 1,329.99 STAGER GYM UTILITIES ELECTRIC 09/13/17-10/11/17 1,125.20 STAGER GYM UTILITIES ELECTRIC 10/12/17-11/09/17 8.67 STAGER GYM UTILITIES GAS 06/02/17-06/30/17 23.32 STAGER GYM UTILITIES GAS 07/01/17-08/31/17 93.42 STAGER GYM UTILITIES GAS 09/01/17-10/31/17
Check Total: 6,984.42
12/19/2017 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 708.75 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS OCT 2017
12/19/2017 EAST BAY CHAPTER ICC 270.00 INT'L CODE COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP-SHREEVE
12/19/2017 EAST BAY POOL SERVICE, INC. 10,560.00 POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE WAVE-OCT 2017 6,680.00 POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE WAVE-NOV 2017
Check Total: 17,240.00
12/19/2017 EVERYTHING GROWS INTERIOR 135.00 PLANT SERVICE DEC 2017
12/19/2017 FEDEX 19.84 EXPRESS SHIPPING
12/19/2017 FEHR & PEERS 4,520.25 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
12/19/2017 FLAG COMPANY, THE 1,652.74 CITY FLAG FOR ALL FACILITIES
12/19/2017 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 125.15 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 12/8/17
12/19/2017 FRANKLIN, RHONDA 17.01 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT NOV 2017 2.46 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT OCT 2017
Check Total: 19.47
12/19/2017 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS, INC. 574.74 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE/STORMWTR RESOURCE PLAN
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 66
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 7 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
12/19/2017 GUIDA SURVEYING INC. 1,566.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017
12/19/2017 H. T. HARVEY & ASSOCIATES 2,828.33 CONSULTING SERVICES-DOUGHERTY RD IMPROV PROJ
12/19/2017 HAAG, JERRY P 1,000.00 PLANNING SERVICES NOV 2017 750.00 PLANNING SERVICES OCT 2017
Check Total: 1,750.00
12/19/2017 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 510.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT AQUATIC COMPLEX
12/19/2017 HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & ASSOC 10,297.33 SALES TAX AUDIT CONSULTING SVCS Q4
12/19/2017 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 43.65 BUILDING CODE BOOK
12/19/2017 IRON MOUNTAIN 195.14 ACAP STORAGE RECORDS DEC 2017
12/19/2017 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 3,225.00 DESIGN SVCS-SAN RAMON RD ARTERIAL MGMT PROJ
12/19/2017 LESLIE'S POOLMART, INC. 39.37 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE
12/19/2017 LINCOLN AQUATICS INC 275.31 POOL SUPPLIES FOR THE WAVE
12/19/2017 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC. 333.00 EXECUTIVE COACHING SERVICES
12/19/2017 OMNI-MEANS LTD 684.00 RADAR SPEED SURVEY
12/19/2017 ONE WORKPLACE L. FERRARI LLC 990.22 OFFICE FURNITURE
12/19/2017 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 2,455.99 EASTERN DUBLIN TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE
12/19/2017 PETERSON, DOUG 231.00 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE
12/19/2017 PG&E 21,032.32 SERVICE TO 11/14/17 5,283.79 SERVICE TO 11/21/17 46.49 SERVICE TO 11/22/17 287.87 SERVICE TO 11/28/17 3,992.28 SERVICE TO 11/29/17 1,039.66 SERVICE TO 11/30/17 23.32 SERVICE TO 11/06/17 41.13 SERVICE TO 11/22/17
Check Total: 31,746.86
12/19/2017 QUALITY COUNTS LLC 2,000.00 INTERSECTION TRAFFIC COUNTS
12/19/2017 QUENCH USA, INC. 806.31 WATER FILTER SYSTEM SERVICES
12/19/2017 ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMENT CO 4,906.13 PICNIC TABLES AT BOCCE COURT AREA
12/19/2017 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP 441.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017
12/19/2017 S & C ENGINEERS, INC. 76,078.62 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN-DOUGHERTY RD IMPROV PROJ
12/19/2017 SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR SVC INC 580.00 ELEVATOR SUMP PUMP REPAIR
12/19/2017 SHRED-IT USA 3,086.60 RECORDS DESTRUCTION SERVICES
12/19/2017 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 362.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES NOV 2017
12/19/2017 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 7,251.00 DUBLIN BLVD RULE 20A CONSTR MGMT/INSPECTION 14,935.00 PRE-AWARD SVCS FOR POLICE SERVICES BLDG 1,815.00 PROJECT MGMT DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING IMPROV PROJ 15,197.00 PROJECT MGMT THE WAVE PROJECT CLOSEOUT
Check Total: 39,198.00
12/19/2017 SWRCB 14,230.00 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE
12/19/2017 T-MOBILE USA, INC. 449.99 CELL PHONE SERVICES TO 11/20/17
12/19/2017 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATES INC 28,710.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017 25,974.50 INSPECTION SERVICES OCT 2017
Check Total: 54,684.50
12/19/2017 VALLEY WINDOW CLEANING INC 715.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES-SHANNON CENTER
12/19/2017 WEST CORPORATION 300.00 SOFTWARE INSTALLATION
12/19/2017 WU, PATRICIA 72.00 REIMB SENIOR CENTER VAN DRIVER MEALS AUG-NOV 2017
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 67
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 8 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
12/19/2017 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 25,542.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017
Payments Issued 12/19/2017 Total: 407,939.27
12/21/2017 4 PAWS GOOSE CONTROL, INC 1,000.00 GEESE CONTROL SERVICES NOV 2017
12/21/2017 ALAMEDA CO SHERIFF'S OFFICE 42.00 PRINTING SERVICES NOV 2017
12/21/2017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC 7,234.56 CROSSING GUARD SERVICES - 11/5/17 TO 11/18/17
12/21/2017 ALLIANT INSURANCE SVCS INC 6,147.00 FACILITY RENTAL INSURANCE JUL-SEP 2017
12/21/2017 AMY'S ENGRAVED SIGNS & AWARDS 27.31 EMPLOYEE NAMEPLATE - YIP
12/21/2017 ARAMARK UNIFORM SVC LOCKBOX 47.59 MAT SERVICE-CIVIC CENTER
12/21/2017 ARLEN NESS, INC. 2,008.17 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/21/2017 ARORA, AKSHAY 9,480.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/21/2017 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING 21,504.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES NOV 2017 20,480.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017 17,216.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES SEP 2017
Check Total: 59,200.00
12/21/2017 AT&T 58.73 WAVE PHONE SERVICE TO 12/04/17
12/21/2017 BIG O TIRES #7 752.32 POLICE VEHICLE TIRE INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE
12/21/2017 BROOKFIELD HOMES 19,857.20 REFUND CASH COMPLETION BONDS 48,014.65 REFUND CASH COMPLETION BONDS
Check Total: 67,871.85
12/21/2017 CAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY INC 12,638.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES NOV 2017
12/21/2017 CALTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 746.99 COPIES NOV 2017
12/21/2017 CENTRAL VALLEY TOXICOLOGY 205.00 POLICE LAB TESTING SERVICES NOV 2017
12/21/2017 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 184.25 MUNI CODE CODIFICATION
12/21/2017 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC 2,219.00 CIVIC CENTER INTERNET NOV 2017
12/21/2017 CRITICAL REACH INC 435.00 CRITICAL REACH ANNUAL SUPPORT FEE
12/21/2017 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 610.00 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES NOV 2017
12/21/2017 DINO VOURNAS PHOTOGRAPHY 382.50 EVENT PHOTOGRAPHY CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING
12/21/2017 DIPIETRO & ASSOC. INC 81.15 PATROL VEHICLE AED BATTERIES
12/21/2017 DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
12/21/2017 DUBLIN UNITED SOCCER LEAGUE 750.00 SHANNON CENTER RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
12/21/2017 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 1,303.75 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS NOV 2017
12/21/2017 EDGE GYMNASTICS TRAINING 4,963.70 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
12/21/2017 ELITE AUTO GLASS INC 65.00 POLICE VEHICLE REPAIR
12/21/2017 ENGEO INC 3,768.66 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MANAGEMENT 3,057.27 SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD MANAGEMENT
Check Total: 6,825.93
12/21/2017 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR 1,595.08 SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS VEHICLE RENTAL NOV 2017
12/21/2017 FASTSIGNS 150.22 TAXI PERMIT SUPPLIES
12/21/2017 FEHR & PEERS 4,205.00 BIKE & PED IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN AMADOR PLAZA 4,236.75 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY
Check Total: 8,441.75
12/21/2017 FORMVERSE, INC. 7,980.00 FORMVERSE SOFTWARE
12/21/2017 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 169.26 WAGE ASSIGNMENT: PE 12/22/17
12/21/2017 GOLDEN STATE FLEET SVCS INC 100.00 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/21/2017 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 3,026.52 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/21/2017 GRAFIX SHOPPE 399.43 POLICE VEHICLE DECALS
12/21/2017 GUIDA SURVEYING INC. 2,262.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES NOV 2017
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 68
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 9 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
12/21/2017 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 2,053.00 TRAFFIC INDEX STUDY FOR ROADWAY DESIGN
12/21/2017 IRON MOUNTAIN 285.05 POLICE RECORDS STORAGE DEC 2017
12/21/2017 KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGINEERS 470.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017
12/21/2017 LANLOGIC INC. 3,885.00 NETWORK ENGINEERING SUPPORT NOV 2017 2,200.00 NETWORK MONITORING OF SERVERS 11,589.70 WI-FI REPLACEMENT-CIVIC & SHANNON CENTERS
Check Total: 17,674.70
12/21/2017 LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS 246.05 DATABASE SEARCHES NOV 2017
12/21/2017 LIVERMORE AUTO GROUP 4,047.44 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/21/2017 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 525.00 GIS CONSULTING SERVICES NOV 2017
12/21/2017 MCGUIRE HARLEY DAVIDSON 57.32 POLICE MOTORCYCLE EQUIPMENT
12/21/2017 NASHED, OLIVIA 78.28 REIMBURSE POSTAGE FOR MAILING ZEISS NOTICES
12/21/2017 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 34,967.89 ENGINEERING SERVICES NOV 2017 15,391.43 ENGINEERING SERVICES OCT 2017
Check Total: 50,359.32
12/21/2017 PUBLIC BENEFIT TECHNOLOGY 400.00 CITY COUNCIL MTG VIDEO SERVICES OCT 2017
12/21/2017 QUENCH USA, INC. 89.59 WATER FILTER SYSTEM SERVICES
12/21/2017 RAYNE OF SAN JOSE 144.65 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES F/S #16 163.80 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES F/S #17 121.80 WATER SOFTENER SERVICES F/S #18
Check Total: 430.25
12/21/2017 SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR SVC INC 315.00 ELEVATOR SERVICE DEC 2017
12/21/2017 SIMPLER SYSTEMS, INC 1,500.00 SOFTWARE LICENSING DEC 2017
12/21/2017 STONERIDGE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE 101.43 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
12/21/2017 SWRCB 946.00 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE - DOUGHERTY RD
12/21/2017 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 208.50 POLICE CRIME LAB SERVICES NOV 2017
12/21/2017 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV 47,626.50 OPERATING SUBSIDY FY 17-18 (PMT 2 OF 2) 888.24 RECORD & TELEVISE COUNCIL MTG NOV 2017
Check Total: 48,514.74
12/21/2017 UNITY OF TRI VALLEY 373.10 SPLATTER FESTIVAL CARNIVAL OPERATOR
12/21/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS 1,712.47 POLICE CELL PHONE SERVICE TO 12/03/17
12/21/2017 VSI RISK MGMT & ERGONOMICS INC 410.00 ERGONOMIC SERVICES
12/21/2017 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 4,343.55 FLOOR SCUBBING MACHINES FOR THE WAVE
12/21/2017 WESTERN PACIFIC SIGNAL LLC 373.64 PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON EXTENDERS 1,035.56 POWER SUPPLY TO BIKE DETECTORS 825.53 REPLACE COMMUNICATIONS SWITCH TASSAJARA RD 2,133.65 REPLACE SIGNAL CONTROLLERS SAN RAMON RD
Check Total: 4,368.38
12/21/2017 WISEMAN, JENNY 1,925.00 RELOCATION EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
12/21/2017 WU, PATRICIA 67.50 CERTIFIED TIRE VAN INSPECTION JUL 2017
12/21/2017 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 20,906.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES NOV 2017
Payments Issued 12/21/2017 Total: 372,562.48
12/26/2017 DSRSD 225,691.38 SERVICE TO 11/30/2017
Payments Issued 12/26/2017 Total: 225,691.38
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 69
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 10 of 10 City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
12/28/2017 CAL PERS 69,741.07 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 12/22/17
12/28/2017 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 17,865.76 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 12/22/17
12/28/2017 I C M A 401 PLAN 895.00 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 12/22/17
12/28/2017 I C M A 457 PLAN 20,810.12 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 12/22/17
12/28/2017 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 62,433.28 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 12/22/17
12/28/2017 US BANK - PARS 3,377.65 PARS: PE 12/22/17
12/28/2017 WAGEWORKS, INC. 2,912.81 WAGEWORKS 2017: PE 12/22/17
Payments Issued 12/28/2017 Total: 178,035.69
Grand Total for Payments Dated 12/1/2017 through 12/31/2017: 3,212,054.10 Total Number of Payments Issued: 274
4.8.a
Packet Pg. 70
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
I
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Appointment to Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District
Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider the Mayor’s recommendation to appoint Alan Brown as
the City of Dublin appointee to the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Confirm the Mayor’s recommendation and adopt the Resolution Making an
Appointment to the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District Board of Trustees.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District Board (ACMAD) is a public agency
serving the people of Alameda County. The Alameda County Board of Supervisors, and
each of the elected councils of the 13 cities within the district, appoints one trustee to
represent its constituency on the governing board of the ACMAD.
The members of the Board of Trustees serve two-year terms without compensation and
receive allowances for expenses incurred in attending business meetings of the board.
Due to the pending expiration of Trustee Guarienti’s term, a request to appoint the City’s
representative has been received.
Mayor Haubert requests that the City Council confirm the appointment of Alan Brown as
the City of Dublin’s appointment to the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District
Board for a term ending January 1, 2020. The appointment would be made upon
approval of the proposed resolution (Attachment 1).
4.9
Packet Pg. 71
Page 2 of 2
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A certified copy of adopted Resolution will be sent to Alameda County Mosquito
Abatement District. A copy of Staff Report was sent to Alan Brown.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Making an Appointment to the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement
District Board of Trustees
4.9
Packet Pg. 72
RESOLUTION NO. XX - 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * *
MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE
ALAMEDA COUNTY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin is authorized to appoint one member of the Board of
Trustees of the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District; and
WHEREAS, the term for the current appointee expires on January 1, 2018; and
WHEREAS, the term of this appointment shall be through January 1, 2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council hereby appoints
Alan Brown, as Board of Trustee representing the City of Dublin on the Mosquito Abatement
District.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this
Resolution to the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9thday of January, 2018, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
Reso No. XX -18, Adopted 1/9/18, Item X.X Page 1 of 1
4.9.a
Packet Pg. 73
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
M
a
k
i
n
g
a
n
A
p
p
o
i
n
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
A
l
a
m
e
d
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
M
o
s
q
u
i
t
o
A
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
T
r
u
s
t
e
e
s
(
M
o
s
q
u
i
t
o
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3) Planned Development
Rezone with a related Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development
Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437 (PLPA 2017 -00036)
Prepared by: Martha Battaglia, Associate Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On December 5, 2017, the City Council heard the proposed Ashton at Dublin Station
project. The project consists of 220 apartment units, and related amenities including a
fitness center, pool, roof top lounge, and 331 parking structured spaces on a 2.36-acre
site located within the Dublin Transit Center. The proposed mix of residential units
includes 122 one-bedroom units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroom units.
Following the public hearing, the City Council deliberated and directed Staff to prepare a
resolution of denial. At its December 19, 2017, the City Council directed Staff to place
the item on the January 9, 2018 agenda for the City Council to provide additional
direction prior to Staff’s preparation of the resolution of denial.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Provide Staff with direction.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No financial impact to the City. All costs associated with this request are borne by the
Applicant.
DESCRIPTION:
Background
The proposed Ashton at Dublin Station project is located within the Transit Center
adjacent to the east Dublin BART Station. The project site is located south of a private
street, east and north of Campbell Lane, and west of DeMarcus Boulevard as shown in
Figure 1 below. This 2.36-acre parcel is the last remaining undeveloped site with a
residential land use designation within the Transit Center master planned area. The site
has a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use designation of High
Density Residential (25+ units per acre) and Planned Development Zoning with a Stage
7.1
Packet Pg. 74
Page 2 of 3
1 Development Plan that permits a high density residential development.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 220-unit apartment community and
related amenities which include a fitness center, pool, roof top lounge, and 331
structured parking spaces. The proposed mix of residential units includes 122 one-
bedroom units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroom units.
The following is a brief overview of the requested entitlements. Please refer to the City
Council Staff Report dated December 5, 2017 (Attachment 1) for a complete analysis of
the project.
Planned Development Zoning - Planned Development Rezone with a related
Stage 2 Development Plan.
Site Development Review Permit - To construct a 220 unit apartment project,
with related amenities consisting of a fitness center, pool, roof top lounge and
structured parking with 331 spaces.
Tentative Map 8437 - For condominium purposes.
On December 5, 2017, the City Council held a Public Hearing to consider the proposed
project. The City Council directed Staff to prepare a resolution of denial for
consideration at a future meeting. On December 19, 2017, the applicant had also
provided the City Council with a letter (Attachment 2) requesting that the agenda item
be delayed until February 6, 2018 to give the applicant time to prepare refined design
documents and supplemental information intended to address the concerns expressed
by the City Council at the December 5, 2017 meeting. At the December 19, 2017
regular meeting, the City Council directed Staff to place the project on the January 9,
2018 agenda for further discussion and to provide additional direction to Staff.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
Although not required for this meeting, a public meeting notice was mailed to all
property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project and posted at
several locations throughout the City.
7.1
Packet Pg. 75
Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENTS:
1. City Council Staff Report dated December 5, 2017 with Attachments
2. Letter from Bob McCullough of UDR to City Council, dated December 19, 2017
7.1
Packet Pg. 76
Page 1 of 4
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Christopher L. Foss, CityManager
SUBJECT: Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3) Planned Development
Rezone with a RelatedStage 2 Development Plan, Site Development
ReviewPermit, and TentativeMap8437 (PLPA 2017 -00036)
Prepared by: MarthaBattaglia, AssociatePlanner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
TheApplicant, Ashton at DublinStation, is proposingto construct a residentialproje ct
comprised of 220 apartment units, and related amenities including afitnesscenter, pool,
roof top lounge, and331spacesofstructuredparking on an approximately 2.36 -acre
sitelocatedwithin theDublinTransitCenter. Theproposed mix of residentialunits
includes122one-bedroomunits, 79 two-bedroomunitsand19three-bedroom units.
The sitehas a landusedesignationofHighDensityResidential (25.1 or greater units
per acre). The application includes a PlannedDevelopmentRezone with a related
Stage 2 DevelopmentPlan, SiteDevelopmentReviewPermit, and Tentative Map8437
for condominium purposes. Staff recommends that the project be foundexemptfrom
CEQA pursuanttoGovernmentCode 65457 for residentialprojectsthatareconsistent
with a specificplan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, deliberateand a take the following actions: a) Waive the
reading and INTRODUCE an Ordinance Approving aPlanned Development Rezone
District and Related Stage 2 DevelopmentPlan for the TransitCenterSite A-3, APN:
986-0034-009-00, PLPA2017-00036; and, b) Adoptthe Resolution Approving A Site
Development ReviewPermitandTentativeMap8437for the TransitCenter Site A -3
Project, APN: 986-0034-009-00, PLPA-2017-00036.
FINANCIALIMPACT:
No financialimpact to theCity. Allcostsassociated with this request are borne bythe
Applicant.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 77
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 2 of 4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Background
TheDublinTransitCenterarea generally is bounded onthenorth by Dublin Boulevard,
on the south by Interstate 580and the existingDublin/PleasantonBARTstation, on the
east by ArnoldRoad, andonthewest bythe IronHorse Trail (Figure 1).
InDecember2002, theCityCounciladopted entitlementsestablishing the Transit
Center. This includedGeneralPlanandEasternDublinSpecificPlanAmendments
Resolution 216-02), a PlannedDevelopmentRezonewith a Stage 1 Development Plan
Ordinance21-02), andsubsequently, a Master Development Agreement (Ordinance 5 -
03) adopted in 2003. Together, theseentitlements allowdevelopmentof up to 1,500
residentialunits on Sites A, B and C of the TransitCenter. Sites A, B and C have been
developed withthe exception of Site A-3, which is the subject of this StaffReport.
Project Site
Site A-3 is thelast remaining site with a residentia l landusedesignation in the Transit
Center. The 2.36-acre site is locatedsouth of a private street, east and north of
Campbell Lane, and west of DeMarcusBoulevard as shown in Figure 1. Thesitehas a
GeneralPlan and EDSP landuse designation of High Density Residential and Planned
Development Zoningwitha Stage 1 Development Plan.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Current Request
Thepropertyowner, Ashton at DublinStation is requesting approval of a 220 -unit
apartmentbuilding, with residentialamenitiesincluding of a fitnesscenter, pool, roof top
lounge, and 331spacesofstructuredparking. The proposed mix of residential units
includes 122one-bedroom units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroomunits.
Thefollowing is a briefoverviewoftherequestedentitlements. Please refer to the
PlanningCommissionStaffReport (Attachment 1) for a complete analysis of theproject.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 78
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 3 of 4
Planned Development Zoning - PlannedDevelopmentRezone with a related
Stage 2 DevelopmentPlan (Attachment 2).
SiteDevelopment Review Permit - To construct a 220-unit apartmentproject,
with related amenities and structured parking with 331 spaces (Attachment 3 and
4).
Tentative Map 8437 - For condominium purposes (Attachment 3 and 4).
TheCityCouncil is beingrequested to takeaction on the Ashton at Dublin Station
project because it includes an approval for which the CityCouncil is the decision maker
i.e. the PlannedDevelopment Zoning). Consistentwith past practice, thePlanning
Commission isthe reviewing body andtheCityCouncil isthe decisionmaking body for
this entire project application.
PLANNING COMMISSIONREVIEW:
ThePlanning Commission held a PublicHearing on November14, 2017 to review the
proposed project (Attachment 5). Six members of the public spoke in opposition to the
project. The City also received thirteencommentlettersregarding the proposed project
Attachment 6). Afterconducting thePublicHearing, the PlanningCommission
recommended that theCityCouncilapprove the proposed project (Attachments 7, 8 and
9).
PUBLIC NOTICING:
Inaccordance with Statelaw, a publicnotice was mailed to all propertyowners and
occupantswithin 300feet of the proposed projectto advertise the projectand posted at
severallocationsthroughout the City. Acopy of this StaffReport has beenprovidedto
theApplicant.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
TheCity has determinedthat the projectqualifies for a statutoryexemptionfromCEQA
underGovernmentCodesection65457. The proposed project is consistent with the
GeneralPlanLand Use Designation for Site A-3 anddoes not exceed the units allowed
bythe Dublin TransitCenter Stage 1 PlannedDevelopment Zoning. An EIRhas been
certifiedforthe Dublin TransitCenter Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning. The CEQA
documentin SupportofaSpecificPlanExemption findsthat noevent as specified in
Section21166 of thePublicResourcesCode has occurredsince the certification of the
Dublin TransitSpecificPlan EIRthat requires preparationof a supplementalCEQA
document. PublicResourcesCodeSection21166and CEQA GuidelinesSection 15162
identify the conditions requiring subsequentenvironmentalreview. After a reviewof
theseconditions, theCity has determined that no subsequent EIR or Negative
Declaration is required for this project.
TheCEQAAnalysis in Supportof a SpecificPlanExemption is included as Attachment
10. The 2002 Dublin Transit CenterEIR, upon which the exemptionrelies, is available
forreview at the Planning Division in City Hall during normal businesshours.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 79
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 4 of 4
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning CommissionStaff ReportdatedNovember 14, 2017 withoutattachments
2. Ordinance Rezoning theDublinTransitCenterSite A-3 Project Site to PD-Planned
Development and Approving a Stage 2 Development Plan
3. Resolution Approving a Site Development ReviewPermit and TentativeMap8437for
theDublinTransit Center Site A-3 Project
4. Exhibit A to CityCouncilResolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map
5. Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes datedNovember14, 2017
6. PublicCommentLetters
7. PlanningCommissionResolution 17-12 Recommending that the CityCouncil Adopt
anOrdinance Rezoning the DublinTransitCenterSite A -3
8. PlanningCommissionResolution 17-13 Recommending that the CityCouncil
ApprovetheSiteDevelopmentReview for Site A-3
9. PlanningCommissionResolution 17-14 Recommending that the CityCouncil
Approvethe Tentative Map for Site A-3
10. AshtonatDublin Station CEQA Analysis Update
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 80
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 1 of 11
STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE: November 14, 2017
TO: Planning Commission
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING: Ashton at DublinStation (Transit Center Site A -3)
Planned Development Rezone with a relatedStage2 Development Plan,
Site Development ReviewPermit, and Tentative Map8437 (PLPA 2017-
00036)
Prepared by: MarthaBattaglia, AssociatePlanner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
TheApplicant, Ashton at DublinStation, is proposing to construct a residentialproject
comprised of 220apartmentunits, and related amenitiesincluding a fitnesscenter, pool,
roof toplounge, and331spaces of structuredparkingon an approximately 2.36 -acre
site located within the DublinTransitCenter. The proposed mix of residential units
includes 122one-bedroom units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroomunits.
The sitehas a landusedesignation of HighDensityResidential (25.1 or greaterunits
peracre). The applicationincludes a PlannedDevelopmentRezone with a related
Stage 2 DevelopmentPlan, SiteDevelopmentReviewPermit, and TentativeMap8437
for condominium purposes. The Planning Commission will reviewthe proposed project
andmake a recommendation to the CityCouncil.
RECOMMENDATION:
Disclose ex-partecontacts, conductthepublichearing, deliberate and adoptthe
following Resolutions: a) Recommending that theCityCouncil adopt an Ordinance
rezoning the DublinTransitCenter Site A-3 project site to PD-Planned Development
and approving a Stage 2 Development Plan; and b) Recommending that theCity
Council approve the SiteDevelopment Review Permit and TentativeMap 8437 for the
Dublin TransitCenterSite A-3 project.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Background
TheDublinTransitCenterarea generally is bounded onthenorth by Dublin Boulevard,
on the south by Interstate 580 and the existing Dublin/Pleasanton BART station, onthe
east by Arnold Road, andonthewest bythe Iron HorseTrail (Figure 1).
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 81
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 2 of 11
InDecember2002, theCityCounciladoptedentitlementsestablishing the Transit
Center. This includedGeneralPlanandEasternDublinSpecific Plan Amendments
Resolution 216-02) to incorporate this area into theEastern Dublin Specific Plan area
and establishinglanduses. Theproject includedPlannedDevelopment Zoning with a
Stage 1 Development Plan (Ordinance 21-02) which established the permitteduses;
site areas andproposed densities; maximum number of residential unitsand non -
residential squarefootage; and a Master Landscaping Plan. The approval also included
a Master DevelopmentAgreement (Ordinance 5-03) approved in May 2003.
TheDublinTransitCenterprojectarea allows for the developmentof 1,500 residential
units on Sites A, B and C; two million square feet of campus office and up to 300
residential unitsonSites D and E; and70,000 squarefeetof retail usesatstreet level
onSites B through E, and a 1-acre Village Green locatedbetween Sites B and C. Sites
A, Band C have been developed with the exception of SiteA -3, which is thesubjectof
this Staff Report.
Project Site
Site A-3 is thelast remaining site with a residentialland use designation in theTransit
Center. The 2.36acre site is located south of a private street, eastand northof
CampbellLane, and west ofDeMarcus Boulevard as shown in Figure 1. The sitehas a
GeneralPlan and EDSP land usedesignationof High DensityResidentialandPlanned
Development Zoning with a Stage 1 DevelopmentPlan.
Figure 1. Vicinity
Map
The projectsite is rectangular in shapeand has a relatively flat topography. Theproject
site is pavedand has previously been used as a parking lot and a constructionstaging
area. Therearenopermanent structures, existing drainage courses, or native
vegetation locatedonthe site. Surrounding street improvementsarelimitedtocurb s
andguttersalongDeMarcusBoulevardandCampbellLane. This vacant site is
surrounded by existing developments (Table 1).
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 82
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 3 of 11
Table 1. Surrounding Land Uses
LOCATION ZONING GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE
CURRENTUSE OF
PROPERTY Building Height
North PD HighDensity
Residential
CamelliaPlace –
112 units
53 feet
3 storiesover 1
levelof parking
South PD Public/Semi-Public PG&E Substation N/A
East PD HighDensity
Residential
Elan – 257 multi-
family townhomes &
condominiums
65 feet
5 storiesover
parking
West PD Medium-High Density
Residential
Tribeca – 52
townhomes
40 feet
3 stories
Current Request
Ashton at Dublin Station is requesting approval of a 220 -unit apartment building, which
includesresidentialamenitiesconsisting of a fitnesscenter, pool, roof top lounge, and
331spaces of structuredparking. The proposed mix of residential units includes122
one-bedroom units, 79 two-bedroomunitsand 19 three-bedroomunits.
The current requestfortheproposed project includes:
Planned Development Zoning - PlannedDevelopmentRezone with a related
Stage 2 DevelopmentPlan.
SiteDevelopment Review Permit - SiteDevelopment Review Permitfor220
apartmentunits, with relatedamenitiesandstructuredparking with 331 spaces.
Subdivision - Tentative Map8437for condominium purposes.
ANALYSIS:
PlannedDevelopment Zoning
TheapplicationincludesaPlanned Development Rezone with arelatedStage 2
Development Plan. TheexistingPlannedDevelopmentZoningStage1 Development
Planestablishedamaximumbuildingheight for highdensityresidential of 5storiesover
parking and a parkingstandardof 1.5 spacesper unit for residential land uses.
Theproject site ispart ofSite A, an 8.29net acre areadelineated as Sites A -1, A-2 and
A-3. The Planned Development Zoningoriginallyanticipated up to 530units across all
ofSite A. Thenumberwas later reducedto 430 units when100unitsweretransferred
toSite C. Thetotal number ofunits constructed in the Dublin TransitCenterproject
area, including the proposed project, would be 1,451 units. This is 46 unitslessthan
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 83
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 4 of 11
anticipated for Site A, and 49 units less than the total allocation of 1,500units forthe
overallTransitCenter, as shown in Table 2.
Table2. Transit Center Residential Development
Site Project Name Units
Constructed/Proposed
Units
Permitted Difference
A-1 Tribeca (52 Units)
384 430 46A-2 CamelliaPlace (112
Units)
A-3 Ashton @ Dublin Station
220 units)
B-1 Elan (257 Units)
562 565 3
B-2 Eclipse (305 units)
C-1 Avalon (505 units) 505 505 ---
Total 1,451 1,500 49
Theproposed Stage 2 Planned Development Zoning isin compliancewith the
requirements of theDublin Zoning Ordinanceand will establish the detailed
development plan forthe site. Thisincludes a preliminary site plan, development
standards, architectural standards, and a preliminarylandscape.
Theproject is compatiblewith the land use concept to maximizetransit opp ortunities
presented bythe adjacent Dublin/PleasantonBARTStation; conforms to the
development standardsadopted for the Dublin TransitCenter; andcontributesto a
vibrant, pedestrianfriendlyenvironment.
A Resolution recommending that the CityCoun cil adopt an Ordinance approving the
Planned Development Rezone with related Stage 2 DevelopmentPlan for the Dublin
TransitCenter Site A-3 is included as Attachment 1, with the draft CityCouncil
Ordinance included as Exhibit A.
SiteDevelopment Review
SitePlan
Theprimaryentry lobby is locatednearthenorthwestcorner of DeMarcusBoulevard
andCampbellLane. The primary entrylobby thatfronts on this corner has a two story
volume and is setback to accommodatea pedestrian plaza. A secondary entr y lobby is
located mid-block on thenorthsideof the buildingalong the private streetthat is shared
with CamelliaPlace. Similar to the primary entry, the building is set back creating a
smallerpedestrian plaza with landscaping. Vehicleaccess tothestructuredparkingwill
bethrough a garage entrylocatedonCampbellLane. The project includesfrontage
improvements and landscapingconsistent withthe improvementsthroughout theTransit
Center.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 84
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 5 of 11
Residentialamenitiesincludinga lobby, fitness centerand a leasing office
approximately 6,200 square feet) areproposedalongDeMarcusBoulevard. Ground -
floorresidential units with front stoopsare proposed on the northelevation, which
enhance the residential scale and characterestablished bythe Camelli a Place
residential project across the street.
Architecture
Theproject architecture has a contemporaryaesthetic with angularlines and includes a
variety of high qualityexteriormaterialsandcolors. Façadetreatmentsincludestucco,
fibercementand metal accent, metal windowsurrounds, limitedareasof storefront
glazing andmetal andtranslucententrycanopies. Balconiesandscreeninginsertsused
within the garageincludetranslucentperforated metal screening.
Theproposedprojectincludesunique architectural featuresand massingelements to
provide visualinterest as well as open space for the occupants. The designincludes
two opposing yet complementary tilted overhanging roof forms whichaccentuatethe
tallermassingelements of the building. Theroofdesignallows the top-level units to
havegenerous windows and optimizedviews of the surroundingarea. Theproject’s
designprovides visual interestas viewed from Interstate 580to the southandthe
pedestrianpathwaysalongDeMarcusBoulevard and Campbell Lane. The design ofthe
east podium courtyardallows glimpse in fromthe surrounding areaandalso provides a
strongpedestrian visual scalefortheproject.
The two-story parkingpodiumfaçades face Campbell Lane tothe west and south. The
parking garage has beendesignedtoinclude architecturalelements thatprovide
functionalscreening as well as visualinterest. Thefaçadeof the parkingstructure is
comprised of framed openings which providearticulation and depthalong the ground
floor. Infill surfaces fill the frames and angle inward in varyingdirections.
Thearchitectureelements described can be seen in therenderingsbelow.
Aerial at SE corner – CampbellLane & DeMarcusBlvd.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 85
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 6 of 11
Themassingof the proposedbuilding is consistent with the scaleoftheadjacent
buildings with the tallest massinglocated at theeast side of the projectopposite the
adjacentbuildingsalongDeMarcusBoulevard (Elan andAvalon). Thelowestmassing is
located onthe west side oppositethelowerheighttownhousesacrossCampbellLane
Tribeca). The proposed rangeofbuildingheights, including 3, 4 and5residential
stories, over parking podium gives the project a senseofvisual interest and variation in
roof profile, and it enablesthebuilding to respond contextually to the preexisting
massingvariation within the TransitCenter.
Afeature of the buildingprojectsovera portion of thesidewalkadjacentto Campbell
Lane. The total projection area is approximately 300 square feet as shown inFigure 2
below. The projection into the right-of-way includeslivingspace, balconiesandroof
overhang. Theprojectionstarts on thethird floor at 23 feet abovegradesoas not to
conflict withuse of thesidewalk.
SEcorner – Campbell Lane & DeMarcusBlvd. NE corner – DeMarcus Blvd.
SW corner – Campbell Lane NW corner – Campbell Lane
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 86
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 7 of 11
Figure 2. Right Of Way Projection
TheCitywillquitclaim feetitle ownership of the area with the proposed building
projection, while reserving apublicaccesseasementand a utilityeasementover the
area. These easementswill allow for continued use of this area by the publicand utility
companies.
Landscaping
Thelandscaping has beendesigned to beconsistent with andcompletesthe
streetscape as identified in theDesignGuidelines for the overall Dublin TransitCenter.
Similar to otherhigherdensityresidential developments, landscaping and recreational
amenitiesareused to providequality open areasandvisual relief.
Plantings and hardscape elementsareused to create neighborhood identificationand
anattractive community entry. Colored concrete unit paversconnect the project site
with the rest of the DublinTransitCenter, while helping to definethemainentries and
gathering spaces.
Thelandscape plan includes trees, along with flowering shrubs and groundcover, which
line anddefinetheprojectentry. Perimeterareas are proposed tobelandscaped wit ha
variety of droughttolerant plantmaterials that arelow maintenance and encourage
water conservation. Please refer toSheets L2.00-L5.00of theattached plans (Exhibit A
to the CityCouncilResolution) fortheproposedplantpalette.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 87
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 8 of 11
Theprojectincludes two podium levelroof courtyards and a swimmingpoolonthethird
floor. Amphitheater stairseating is proposednear the project’s southeast cornerwithin
thepedestrianplaza. Benches and raised plantersarelocatedthroughoutthe
landscape public spaces.
There is a 20’ stormdraineasement located alongthe easternproperty boundaryalong
DeMarcus Boulevard. This easement area is planted with a variety of taller flowering
shrubsandsucculents that delineatethespacewithoutusingfences or walls .
Incompliance with waterqualityrequirements, flow through planters are located on the
northernportionofthe projectsite and within the open courtyard areas. Theplantings
within theseareas includegrasses and flowering plants.
Private sidewalks with publicaccessareproposed on all four frontages. Theproject
includes a variety of sitelighting, includingtree uplight, pool & spa lighting, stake
mounted LED lights along pathways, recessedplanterwall lights and decorative string
lights. The conceptual lightingplan is shownonSheet L6.00 of the attached plans.
Floor Plans
Theproject includes a mix of studio, one, two and three -bedroom flatsthatvary in size
andlayout. The floor plansare shown on SheetA21ofthe attached plans. Access to
the units wouldbeprimarily from interiorcorridors with exception to the stoopunits
along the privatestreetfacingCamelliaPlacetothenorth. An open -air bridge
comprised primarily of perforatedmetal screen is visiblefromthesouthelevationand
provides a connectionacrosstheeastern podium.
Table 3 belowdetails the squarefootageoftheindividualunits as well as the
percentageofeachunittypewithin the project.
TABLE 3. Floor Plans
Unit Type Square Footage # of Units % of Project
Jr. 1 Bedroom 640 SF 22 10.0%
1 Bedroom 800 SF 92 41.8%
1+ Bedroom 975 SF 8 3.6%
2 Bedroom 1,120 SF 79 35.9%
3 Bedroom 1,280 SF 19 8.6%
Total 100%
Parking
The DevelopmentRegulations for theDublinTransitCenterrequire 1.5 parkingspaces
per unit, which includesguest parking. Based on this standard, a total of 330 spaces
would be required. Theproposedproject provides 331 spaceslocated within a two –
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 88
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 9 of 11
storypodium parkinggarage. Fifteen percent (15%) of the required parkingspaces (50
spaces) areunassignedguestparkingspaces. Additionally, surfacestallswillbelocated
on the publicstreets along the project frontage, whicharenotincluded inthe parking
requirement for the project.
Bicycle storageparking is provided on the first flooroftheparking garage. Atotal of130
bicycle parkingstallsareprovided.
Affordable Housing/Inclusionary Zoning
TheDublinTransitCenterrequires 15% of theresidential units be affordable units. The
Camellia Place apartment project onSite A-2 has beenusedtosatisfy the very low and
lowportionof the inclusionary housingrequirement for the project. Tenpercent (10%) of
the units in the proposed project are required tobe affordable to moderateincome
household earning between 80% and 120% of thearea median income adjusted for
actual householdsize. The affordableunitsarerequired to reflecttherange of numbers
ofbedrooms provided inthe project. Theapplicantproposes to provide the required
number of moderateincomeunits (22) which willinclude a range of one, two and three -
bedroom units. A Condition of Approval hasbeen placedonthe projectthat requiresthe
applicant to enter into an AffordableHousingAgreement.
Public Art Compliance
Theproject is partof a comprehensive plan to providepublic artas partof the Dublin
TransitCenter project. Thepublic art requirement has alreadybenesatisfied.
Tentative Map
Although the project is proposed for occupancy as apartments, the Applicant is
requestingapproval of a Tentative Map for condominiumpurposesas is common with
otherrecentapartmentprojects.
A Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Site Development
ReviewPermitand Tentative Map is included as Attachment 2, with thedra ft City
CouncilResolution included as Exhibit A.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE:
Theproject site hasa current General Plan and EDSP landusedesignation of High
DensityResidentialandconsistentPlanned Development Zoning. The proposed project
is consistent with theland use designation and zoning. Theproject will contributeto
housing opportunities anddiversity of product type and complement thesurrounding
neighborhoods.
Theproposedproject has been reviewed for conformance with the Community Design
and Sustainability Element of theGeneralPlan. Theprojecthasbeendesigned to be
compatible with adjacent and surrounding development. Pedestriancirculationand
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 89
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 10of11
gathering spaces have allbeen linkedtogether withsidewal ksand public and private
streets. In general, theproposedprojectfurthersthegoalsoftheCommunityDesign
and Sustainability Element of theGeneralPlan by providing a highquality of life and
preserving resources and opportunities for futuregenerations.
REVIEW BYAPPLICABLE DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES:
TheBuildingDivision, FirePreventionBureau, PublicWorks Department, and Dublin
SanRamon ServicesDistrict reviewed the projectandprovided Conditions of Approval
where appropriatetoensure that the Project is established in compliance withall local
Ordinances andRegulations. ConditionsofApproval from these departments and
agencies havebeen includedin the attachedResolutionpertaining to the Site
Development ReviewPermit and TentativeMap (Exhibit A to Attachment 2).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
TheCity has determinedthat the projectqualifies for a statutoryexemptionfromCEQA
underGovernmentCodesection65457. The proposed project is consistent with the
GeneralPlanLand Use Designation for Site A-3 anddoes not exceed the units allowed
bythe DublinTransitCenterStage 1 PlannedDevelopmentZoning. An EIRhas been
certified forthe Dublin TransitCenter Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning. The CEQA
document in Support of a Specific Plan Exemptionfinds that no event as specified in
Section21166 of thePublicResourcesCode has occurredsince the certification of the
Dublin TransitSpecificPlan EIRthat requires preparationof a supplementalCEQA
document. PublicResourcesCode Section 21166and CEQA GuidelinesSection15162
identify the conditions requiring subsequentenvironmentalreview. After a reviewof
theseconditions, theCity has determined that no subsequent EIR or Negative
Declaration is requiredfor this project.
TheCEQAAnalysis in Support of aSpecific Plan Exemption is included as Attachment
3. The2002 Dublin TransitCenterEIR, upon which theexemptionrelies, is available
forreview at the Planning Division in City Hall duringnormal business hours.
PUBLIC NOTICING:
Inaccordance with State law, a publicnotice was mailedto all propertyowners and
occupantswithin300feetof the proposed projectto advertise theprojectand the and
posted at severallocationsthroughouttheCity. Acopy of this Staff Report has been
provided to the Applicant.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. PC Resolutionrecommending thatthe City CounciladoptanOrdinance Rezoning the
Dublin TransitCenterSite A-3
1a. Exhibit A to Attachment 1
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 90
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Page 11of11
2. PC Resolution recommending that the City Council approve theSDR & Tentative
Map for siteA-3
2a. Exhibit A to Attachment 2
2b. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution approving the SDR & TentativeMap
3. Ashton at DublinStation_CEQA Analysis
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 91
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
1
ORDINANCENO. XX – 17
AN ORDINANCE OF THECITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE DISTRICT ANDRELATED STAGE 2
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FORTHETRANSITCENTERSITE A-3
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA 2017-00036
The DublinCityCouncil does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS
A. The Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, proposes to construct a residential project
comprisedof220apartment units, residentialamenitiesincludingafitnesscenter, pool, rooftop
lounge, and331 spaces of structured parkingonan approximately 2.36-acre site. The
applicationsinclude a Planned Development rezoning with a relatedStage 2 Development Plan,
Site Development ReviewPermit, and Tentative Map8437 for condominium purposes. The
proposed development and applicationsare collecti vely known asthe “Project”.
B. The project site is approximately 2.36 acreslocated at the northwestcorner of Campbell
Lane and DeMarcusBoulevard (APN986-0034-009-00).
C. To comply with theCaliforniaEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Stateguidelines and
Cityenvironmental regulations, theCityprepared a CEQAAnalysis in Support of a Specific Plan
Exemption.
D. Following a public hearing on November 14, 2017, the PlanningCommission adopted
Resolution 17-12, recommendingapproval of the PlannedDevelopmentRezone and related
Stage 2 DevelopmentPlan, whichresolution is incorporated herein by referenceandavailable
for review at City Hallduringnormalbusiness hours.
E. A StaffReport, datedDecember 5, 2017and incorporated herein by reference, described
and analyzed the project, includingthePlannedDevelopment Rezone andrelatedStage 2
DevelopmentPlan, forthe City Council.
F. On December5, 2017, theCity Councilheld a properly noticedpublichearing onthe project,
including the proposed Planned Development Rezoneand related Stage 2 Development Plan,
at which timeall interested parties had the opportunity to be heard .
H. The CityCouncilconsidered the CEQA Analysis and related prior CEQAdocuments andall
above referenced reports, recommendations, andtestimonypriortotakingaction onthe project.
SECTION 2: FINDINGS
A. PursuanttoSection 8.32.070ofthe Dublin MunicipalCode, the CityCouncil finds as follows.
1. The Transit CenterSite A-3 ProjectPlannedDevelopmentzoningmeets the purpose and
intent ofChapter8.32in that it provides a comprehensivedevelopmentplan thatcreates
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 92
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
2
a desirable use of land that is sensitive to surroundingland usesby virtue of the layout
anddesign of the site plan.
2. Development of the project under thePlanned Development zoningand the related
Stage 2 Development Planwill be harmonious and compatible with existing and future
development in thesurrounding area in that the sitewill provideresidential development
consistent with the surroundingdevelopment. The proposed projectmaintainstheurban
character anticipated bythe existing approvals for the TransitCenter includingthe
existing Planned Development Zoning and Stage 1 Development Plan. The proposed
projectwillcontribute to housing opportunities anddiversity of producttype as a
complement to the surroundingneighborhoods.
B. Pursuant to Sections 8.120.050.A and B of the DublinMunicipal Code, theCity Council finds
as follows.
1. ThePlanned Development zoning forthe project and therelated Stage 2 Development
Planwill be harmonious and compatible with existing and potentialdevelopment in the
surroundingarea in that the proposed site plan has takenintoaccount a land usetype
and density that is compatiblewith the adjacent areasand densities. In addition, the
massing of the proposed building is consistent with the scale of theadjacentbuildings
with the tallest masseslocated at the east side opposite the adjacentbuildings along
DeMarcusBoulevard (ElanandAvalon), and the lowest masseslocated on the west side
opposite the lowertownhousesacrossCampbell Lane (Tribeca).
2. Theproject site is physicallysuitable for thetypeandintensity of thezoningdistrict being
proposed in that theproject site is flatwith improved streets on four sidesandserved by
existingpublicutilities. The projectsite conditions are documented in the CEQAAnalysis
for this projectandpriorcertified Environmental ImpactReports (EIR), and theprojectwill
implement all adoptedmitigationmeasures, as applicable. Thereare no site conditions
thatwereidentified in the CEQAAnalysis that will present an impediment to development
of the site for the proposed residential development. Thereare no majorphysical or
topographic constraints and thusthe site is physicallysuitable for the typeandintensity of
the residentialdevelopmentapprovedthrough thePlanned Development zoning.
3. ThePlanned Development zoningwill not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in thevicinity, or bedetrimentaltothepublic health, safetyand
welfare in thatthe project willcomply withall applicable development regulationsand
standards andwillimplement all adopted mitigationmeasures, as applicable. Theproject
uses are compatible with surrounding uses.
4. ThePlanned Development zoning is consistent with the Dublin General Plan and the
Eastern DublinSpecific Plan, in that the proposed residentialdensity anduses are
consistent with the High DensityResidentialland use designationfor the site.
Pursuanttothe California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council finds as follows:
1. Theproject is found to be exemptfrom CEQA pursuanttoGovernmentCodesection
65457 for residentialprojects thatare consistentwith a Specific Plan. Theproject is
within the scopeofthe Final EnvironmentalImpact Report forthe DublinTransit Center
GeneralPlan Amendment, EasternDublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 93
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
3
Development Zoning, Tentative ParcelMap, and Development Agreement (SCH
2001120395) which was certified by theCityCouncilResolution No. 215 -02 dated
November 19, 2002. The CEQA Analysis prepared for the project is incorporatedherein
by this referenceanddetermined that no event asspecified in Section21166of the
PublicRecourses Code has occurred since the certification oftheDublinTransit
SpecificPlanEIRthat requires preparationof a Supplemental CEQA document.
SECTION 3: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
Pursuantto Chapter 8.32, Title 8of the City of DublinMunicipal Code theCityofDublin Zoning
Map is amended torezone the propertydescribed below to a PlannedDevelopment Zoning
District:
2.36 acres at the northwest corner of Campbell Lane and DeMarcus Boulevard (APN
986-0034-009-00).) (“Project site”, or “Property”).
A mapoftherezoningarea is shown below:
SECTION 4. APPROVAL OF STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The regulations forthe use, development, improvement, and maintenance ofthe projectsite are
setforth in the following Stage 2 Development Plan forthe project area, which is hereby
approved. Any amendments to the Stage 2 Development Planshallbe in accordancewith
section 8.32.080 of the DublinMunicipalCode or its successors.
Stage 2 Development Plan for the Transit Center Site A-3 Project
This is a Stage 2 Development PlanpursuanttoChapter 8.32 oftheDublin Zoning Ordinance.
This DevelopmentPlan meets all the require ments for the Stage 2 Development Plan set forth
in Chapter 8.32of the ZoningOrdinanceand is adopted as partofthe PlannedDevelopment
Rezone for the Transit Center Site A-3 project, PLPA-2017-00036.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 94
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
4
The PlannedDevelopment District allows flexibilityneeded to encourageinnovative
development while ensuring that thegoals, policiesandactionprograms of theGeneralPlan,
EasternDublin Specific Plan, and provisions of Chapter 8.32, PlannedDevelopment Zoning
District of the ZoningOrdinance are satisfied.
1. Statement of Compatibility with Stage 1 DevelopmentPlan.
TheAshton at Dublin Station Stage 2 Development Plan is consistent with the Stage 1
Development Plan for Site A of the Dublin TransitCenter, in that it providesfor HighDensity
Residentialuses as approved in Ordinance21-02.
2. Statement of Uses.
Permitted, Conditional and AccessoryUsesshallbe as adopted by Ordinance 21 -02, the
Dublin TransitCenter Stage 1Planned Development Zoning Development Plan (PA00 -013).
3. Stage 2 Site Plan.
The siteplan shall generally be as shown inthe conceptual site planbelow.
4. Site area, proposeddensities.
SiteArea: 2.36 acres
Density: 25+ dwelling units/acre
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 95
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
5
5. Development Regulations.
Thefollowing development regulationsare in addition to thoseidentified in thePlanned
Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan (Ordinance 21-02).
DEVELOPMENTREGULATIONS
MaximumNumber of Units 220
MaximumNumber of 3 BedroomUnits 12%
Maximum Building Height 85feet
MinimumCommonOutdoorSpace 15%(1)
1) Percentage of totalsite acreage.
6. Preliminary/Master Neighborhood LandscapePlan.
The street levellandscape shallbeas generally depictedbelow and shallcomply with the
TransitCenter Stage 1 Development PlanandDesign Guidelines andreflect the following
standards:
Createcomfortableoutdoorspaces for residents and visitors, which include amenities
such as plantingareas, seatwalls with stone blocks that serve as outdoorseating,
andpodium courtyards.
Create a visualbuffer and soften the edge between the public realm andthesite.
Treatstormwater runoffonthe site through the utilization offlowthroughplanters and
mechanicaldevices.
Utilize plantsthatprovidea year round vegetated landscape with seasonality, color,
andinterest foran attractivevisual environment.
7. Architectural Standards.
The architectural design of theprojectshallreflectthe following standards:
Utilize a contemporaryarchitecture style.
Employhigh qualitymaterials to providevisualinterest in the projectandto
complement its surroundings.
Incorporate featuressuch as different wall planes, heights, walltextures, roof
elements, lightfixtures and landscaping to contributelayers of detail at the
pedestrian level.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 96
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
6
Providefunctional outdoor plazas where peoplecangatherand socialize, with
landscaping, outdoor seating, enhancedpaving treatment, and other features to
provide an appropriateurbanscale forthe development.
Illustrative examplesof architectural style:
8. AerialPhoto.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 97
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
7
9. Applicable Requirements of DublinZoning Ordinance.
Except as specifically provided in the Dublin TransitCenter Stage 1Planned Development
ZoningDevelopmentPlan (Ordinance 21-02) and this Stage 2 Development Plan, the use,
development, improvements and maintenance ofthepropertyshallbe governed bythe
provisions of the closest comparableZoningDistrict as determined by the Community
DevelopmentDirector andoftheDublinZoningOrdinancepursuant to Section 8.32.060.C.
No development shall occur on this property until a SiteDevelopmentReviewPermit has
been approved for the property.
SECTION 5. POSTING OF ORDINANCE
The CityClerk of theCity of Dublinshallcause this Ordinance tobe posted inat least three (3)
publicspaces in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section36933oftheGovernmentCodeof
the Stateof California.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shalltake effectthirty (30) days following its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of theCity of Dublin, on this _________
day of _____________ 2017, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
CityClerk
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036Parcel A-3 Stage 2 PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\CC Attachments\2. City CouncilOrdinance rezoning the DublinTransit Center A-3
projectsite to PD-Planned Development.DOC
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 98
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
RESOLUTIONNO. xx-17
A RESOLUTION OF THECITYCOUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING A SITEDEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT AND TENTATIVE MAP 8437 FOR
THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3 PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA-2017-00036
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing to construct a
residentialproject comprised of 220 units, residentialamenitiesincluding a fitnesscenter, pool,
roof top lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parkingon an approximately 2.36 -acre site
located on Site A-3 in the DublinTransitCenter. Theproposed development and applications
are collectivelyknown asthe “Project”; and
WHEREAS, theapplicationsincludePlannedDevelopmentRezone with a related Stage
2 Development Plan, SiteDevelopmentReview, andTentativeMap8437; and
WHEREAS, theProjectSite is located at the northwest corner of Campbell Laneand
DeMarcusBoulevard within the Eastern Dublin SpecificPlanarea, and more specificallywithin
the DublinTransit Center Villagearea; and
WHEREAS, the CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct (CEQA), together with the State
guidelinesandCity environmentalregulations, requirethat certain projects be reviewed for
environmentalimpacts and that environmentaldocuments be prepared. Tocomply with CEQA,
the Cityprepared a CEQA Analysis in Supportof a SpecificPlanExemption; and
WHEREAS, Staffrecommends that theproject be foundexempt from CEQA pursuantto
GovernmentCode65457 for residentialprojects that areconsistent with a specificplan. The
project is within the scopeof the FinalEnvironmental Impact Report for the Dublin Transi t
Center General PlanAmendment, EasternDublinSpecificPlanAmendment, Stage 1 Planned
DevelopmentZoning, Tentative ParcelMap, andDevelopment Agreement (SCH 2001120395)
which was certified bythe CityCouncilResolution No. 215 -02 datedNovember19, 2002. The
CEQA analysis prepared for theproject is incorporatedherein by this reference and determined
that no event as specified in Section 21166ofthePublicRecoursesCode has occurredsince
the certificationoftheDublinTransitSpecificPlan EIR th at requirespreparation of a
SupplementalCEQAdocument; and
WHEREAS, a StaffReport, dated November 14, 2017 was submitted to the Planning
Commission recommending CityCouncilapproval of theproposedproject; and
WHEREAS, thePlanningCommission held aproperlynoticedpublichearing on the
project on November 14, 2017, at which timeall interestedpartieshadthe opportunity to be
heard; and
WHEREAS, the PlanningCommissionadopted Resolutio n 17-12 recommending theCity
Counciladopt anOrdinance approving the PlannedDevelopmentRezone with a related Stage 2
Development Pan; and
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 99
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
2
WHEREAS, thePlanning Commission adopted Resolutions 17 -13 and17-14
recommending the CityCouncil adopt aResolution approving the SiteDevelopment Review
Permit and Tentative Map; and
WHEREAS, onDecember 5, 2017, the CityCouncil held aduly noticedpublic hearing on
the Project at which time all interestedparties had the opportunity to be heard ; and
WHEREAS, a StaffReportdated December 5, 2017 andincorporatedherein by
reference, described and analyzed the Project ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use its independentjudgementand considered
all said reports, recommendations, andtestimonyhereinabove set forthbefore approving the
Project; and
WHEREAS, following the publichearing, theCityCounciladopted Ordinance xx-17
approving the Planned Development Rezone with a relatedStage 2 DevelopmentPlan. The
aboveOrdinance is incorporated herein by reference and is availablefor review at CityHall
during normalbusiness hours.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITRESOLVED that the above recitalsaretrueandcorrectand
made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDthattheCityCounciloftheCity of Dublinhereby makes
the following findings and determinationsregarding the proposed Site Development Review
PermitforSite A-3oftheDublin Transit Center.
A. Theproposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 8.104 of the Zoning
Ordinance, with theGeneralPlanandanyapplicableSpecificPlans and design
guidelinesbecause: 1) Theproject is compatible with the architectural character and
scale of development inthe immediate area in whichtheproposedproject is to be
located; 2) theproject is utilizing contemporary, high-qualitymaterials and finishes; 3)
theproject will provide a needed and attractive housingopportunityadjacent to the
EastDublin/Pleasanton BART station; 4) theproject is consistent with the General
Plan and EasternDublinSpecificPlan landuse designationofHighDensity
Residential; and 5) the project is consistent with theTransitCenterStage 1 Planned
Development Zoning in that it providesadditionalhousingopportunities in close
proximity to the East Dublin/PleasantonBARTstation.
B. Theproposal is consistent with the provisionsof Title 8, Zoning Ordinance because:
1) the projectcontributes to theorderly, attractive, and harmonious site and
architecturaldevelopment that is compatible with the architecturalstyle, intensityof
development, andcontext of surroundingandadjacentproperties; and 2) theproject
complies with the development standardsestablished inthe Planned Development
Ordinance forthe project site.
C. Thedesign of the project is appropriate to the City, the vicinity, surrounding
properties, and thelot(s) in which theproject is proposedbecause: 1) the size and
mass of the proposed buildings are consistentwith other residential development in
the immediatevicinity and incompliancewith thepermitted development
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 100
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
3
density/intensity; 2) theproject will contribute to housing opportunities as a
complement to thesurrounding neighborhoods; and 3) the projectincludes
landscaping and recreational amenitiesthat provide high qualityopen areas and
visual relief.
D. Thesubject site is suitable for thetype and intensity of the approveddevelopment
because: 1) the projectsite is flat andcontains no physicalimpediments to the
proposed residentialdevelopment; 2) the project will implement all applicableprior
adopted mitigation measures; 3) theproject site is fully served by public services and
existing roadways; and 4) the projectdesign and intensitycomplementsthemajor
publicinvestment in transit.
E. Impacts to existingslopes and topographic features are addressed because : 1) the
project site is already urbanizedandrelatively flat; 2) theroadway and utility
infrastructure toserve thesite already exists, and3) the project sitehas been
previously graded and is relatively flat.
F. Architecturalconsiderationsincluding the character, scaleand quality ofthe design,
site layout, the architectural relationship with the site andotherbuildings, screening of
unsightly uses, lighting, building materialsand colors and similarelements result in a
projectthat is harmonious withits surroundings and compatible with other
developments in thevicinity because: 1) the architectural style and materialswill be
consistent and compatiblewith the contemporaryarchitectural style, colors, and
materials being utilized on other multi-familyprojects in the immediate vicinity; 2) the
project is utilizingcontemporary, high-qualitymaterialsandfinishes; 3) the project’s
designprovides visual interest as viewed from Interstate 580 to thesouthand the
pedestrian pathways along DeMarcusBoulevardandCampbellLane; and 4) the size
andscale of the developmentwill be similar to multi-familyprojectsalready
constructed in the immediate projectvicinity.
G. Landscapeconsiderations, including the location, type, size, color, textureand
coverage of plant materials, and similar elements have beenincorporated into the
project to ensure visual relief, adequatescreening and an attractive environment for
thepublicbecause: 1) landscaping is proposedtoprovide visual reliefwithinanurban
development; 2) the landscaping has beendesigned to beconsistent with the Design
Guidelines for theoverallDublinTransitCenter; 3) theproject’s landscapingprovides
openspace and visual relief; and 4) theproject will conform to the requirements ofthe
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
H. The sitehas been adequately designedto ensure thepropercirculationforbicyclist,
pedestrians, and automobiles because: 1) all infrastructureincludingdriveways,
pathways, sidewalks, and streetlightinghave been reviewed for conformance with
City policies, regulations, and best practicesandhavebeen designed withmulti -
modaltravel in mind; 2) the project site provides opportunitiesfor pedestrian and
bicycle circulation; and 3) the projectwill provide linksto transit orientedsystemsand
regionaltrails.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDthattheCityCounciloftheCity of Dublinherebymakes
the following findingsanddeterminations regarding TentativeMap8437:
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 101
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
4
Tentative Map 8437
A. Theproposed Tentative Map8437together with the provisions for its designand
improvements is consistent with the intent of applicable subdivision regulationsand
relatedordinancesfortheEasternDublinSpecificPlanandDublinTransitCenter.
B. Theproject site is physically suitablefor the type and proposed density of development
as it is consistentwith theStage 1 PlannedDevelopmentZoning and the adjacent
residentialdevelopments.
C. The proposedTentative Map 8437 is consistent with the intent ofapplicable
improvements of the Tentative TractMapand PlannedDevelopmentzoningapproved for
Project and thereforeconsistent with the City ofDublin General PlanandStage1
PlannedDevelopment Zoning.
D. Theproposed Tentative Map8437willnotresult in environmentaldamage or
substantiallyinjure fish or wildlife or their habitat or causepublichealthconcernssubject
toexistingadopted MitigationMeasures and Conditionsof Approval.
E. Theproject design will not cause serious publichealth concerns as it has been
conditionedtocomply with all buildingcodesandordinances in effect at the timeof
permit issuance.
F. Thedesignofthe project will not conflictwitheasements, acquired bythe public at large,
or access through or useofproperty within the proposedproject site. TheCityEngineer
has reviewed the map andtitle reportandhas not foundany conflictingeasements of this
nature
G. Thedesign or improvements of the tentative map are consistent with the City’s General
Planand the Stage1Planned Development Zoning.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin CityCouncilherebyapprovestheSite
Development Review Permit for TransitCenterSite A-3 as shown on plansprepared by BAR
Architects, BKFandFletcherStudiodated received August30, 2017, attached as Exhibit A and
subject to theconditionsincludedbelow.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED thatthe Dublin CityCouncil hereby approves Tentative
Map 8437prepared by BKFdated received August 30, 2017, attached as Exhibit A andsubject
to the conditions included below.
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL:
Unlessstated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied withpriortothe issuance of
building permits or establishment of use, and shallbe subject to PlanningDepartmentreviewand
approval. The followingcodes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring
compliance ofthe conditions of approval. [PL.] Planning, [B] Building, [PO] Police, [PW] Public Works
P&CS] Parks & CommunityServices, [ADM] Administration/City Attorney, [FIN] Finance, [F] Alameda
County Fire Department, [DSR] DublinSanRamonServices District, [CO] AlamedaCounty Department
of Environmental Health, [Z7] Zone 7.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 102
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
5
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
1. Approval. This Site Development Review and Tentative
Map8467approval isfor theTransit CenterSite A-3 (PLPA-
2017-00036). Thisapproval shallbe asgenerallydepicted
and indicated on the project plans prepared by BAR
Architects, BKF, and FletcherStudiodatedreceived August
30, 2017, attachedasExhibit A, and other plans, text, and
diagramsrelating to this Site Development Review, and as
specified asthe followingConditions of Approval for this
project. This approval is subject to approval ofa companion
Planned Development Zoning (Stage 2).
PL On-going
2. Permit Expiration – SiteDevelopment Review. Approval
of thisSite Development Reviewshall be valid until the later
ofone (1) year fromthe effective date, or theterm for this
approvalestablishedin the DevelopmentAgreement, if any,
for the project. This approval shall be null and void in the
event the approved use failstobe establishedwithin the
prescribed time. Commencement oftheuse means the
establishment of use pursuant to the Permit approval or,
demonstratingsubstantialprogresstowardcommencing such
use. If there is a disputeas to whether the Permit has
expired, the Citymay hold a noticedpublichearing to
determine the matter. Such a determination maybe
processed concurrently with revocation proceedings in
appropriate circumstances. Ifa Permitexpires, a new
application mustbe madeandprocessedaccording tothe
requirements of this Ordinance.
PLOne year after
Effective Date
or perterms
outlined in the
DA
3. Permit Expiration – Tentative Map. Approval ofthe
Tentative Map shall be valid for 36 monthsfrom theeffective
date assetforth in Section 9.08.130.A ofthe Dublin
Municipal Code.
PW 36 months after
Effective Date
4. Time Extension. Theoriginalapproving decision-maker
may, upon the Applicant’s writtenrequest for an extension of
approval prior to expiration, upon the determination that all
Conditions of Approval remain adequateandallapplicable
findings of approvalwillcontinue to be met, grant an
extension ofthe approval for a period notto exceed six (6)
months. All time extensionrequests shall be noticed and a
public hearing shallbe held before the original hearingbody.
PL One Year
Following
Expiration Date
or perterms
outlined in the
DA
5. Compliance. Developer shallcomply with the Subdivision
MapAct, the City of Dublin Subdivision and Zoning
Ordinances, City of Dublin Title 7 Public Works Ordinance,
whichincludes the GradingOrdinance, the City of Dublin
PublicWorks StandardsandPolicies, the most current
requirements ofthe StateCode Title 24 and the Americans
with Disabilities Act withregard to accessibility, andall
building andfire codesand ordinancesin effect atthe time of
buildingpermitissuance. All public improvements
constructed by Developer andtobe dedicated to the City are
hereby identifiedas “publicworks” underLaborCodesection
1771. Accordingly, Developer, in constructing such
improvements, shall complywith the Prevailing Wage Law
LaborCode. Sects. 1720 and following).
PL, PW On-going
6. Revocation of Permit. The Site Development Review
approvalshall be revocable for cause in accordancewith
Section 8.96.020.I ofthe Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any
PL On-going
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 103
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
6
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
violation of the terms or conditions of thispermitshall be
subject to citation.
7. Requirements and Standard Conditions. The Applicant/
Developer shallcomplywith applicable City of Dublin Fire
PreventionBureau, Dublin Public Works Department, Dublin
BuildingDepartment, Dublin PoliceServices, Alameda
County Flood ControlDistrict Zone7, Livermore Amador
ValleyTransit Authority, AlamedaCountyPublicand
Environmental Health, Dublin San RamonServicesDistrict
andthe California Department of HealthServices
requirementsand standard conditions. Prior to issuance of
buildingpermits or the installation ofany improvements
relatedto thisproject, theApplicant/Developer shallsupply
written statements fromeach such agency or department to
the Planning Department, indicating that all applicable
conditionsrequiredhave been orwill be met.
VariousBuildingPermit
Issuance
8. Required Permits. The Applicant/Developer shallobtain all
permitsrequiredbyother agencieswhich may include, but
are not limited to AlamedaCountyEnvironmental Health,
AlamedaCounty FloodControl andWater Conservation
District (Zone 7), CaliforniaDepartment of Fish and Wildlife,
Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Caltrans, or otherregional/stateagencies as required
by law, as applicable. Copies of the permits shallbe provided
to the PublicWorks Department.
PW Building Permit
Issuance
9. Fees. The Applicant/Developer shallpay all applicablefees
in effect atthe time of buildingpermitissuance, including, but
not limited to, Planningfees, Building fees, Traffic Impact
Fees, TVTC fees, DublinSan Ramon ServicesDistrict fees,
Public Facilities fees, DublinUnified SchoolDistrict School
Impactfees, Fire FacilitiesImpact fees, Alameda County
Flood and Water Conservation District (Zone 7) Drainage and
WaterConnection fees; or any other feethat may be adopted
and applicable, asprovidedby the Development Agreement,
if any.
VariousBuilding Permit
Issuance
10. Indemnification. The Applicant/Developer shall defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Dublin andits
agents, officers, andemployees fromanyclaim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers,
or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval
ofthe City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appealboard,
PlanningCommission, City Council, Community
Development Director, ZoningAdministrator, or any other
department, committee, or agency of the City to the extent
such actions arebrought within the time period required by
Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable law;
provided, however, that the Applicant’s/Developer's duty to
so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be subject to
the City's promptly notifying the Applicant/Developer of any
said claim, action, or proceedingand theCity's full
cooperation in the defense of such actions or proceedings.
ADM On-going
11. Clarification of Conditions. In the event thatthere needs to
be clarification tothe Conditions of Approval, the Director of
Community Development and theCity Engineer have the
authority to clarify the intent of these Conditions of Approval
PW On-going
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 104
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
7
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
to the Developerwithoutgoing to a publichearing. The
Director of CommunityDevelopment and the CityEngineer
alsohave the authority to make minormodifications to these
conditions without going to a public hearing inorder for the
Applicant/Developer to fulfillneeded improvementsor
mitigationsresulting from impacts of this project.
12. Clean-up. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for
clean-up anddisposal of projectrelatedtrash to maintain a
safe, clean, and litter-freesite.
PL On-going
13. Modifications. Modifications or changes to this Site
Development Reviewapproval maybe consideredby the
Community DevelopmentDirector incompliancewith
Chapter 8.104ofthe ZoningOrdinance.
PL On-going
14. Controlling Activities. The Applicant/Developer shallcontrol
all activities onthe project site so as not to create a nuisance
to the existing or surroundingbusinesses and residences.
PL On-going
15. Accessory/Temporary Structures. Theuse of any
accessory or temporarystructures, suchas storage sheds or
trailer/containers usedfor storageor foranyother purposes,
shall be subject to reviewandapproval by the Community
Development Director.
PL On-going
PROJECT SPECIFIC
16. Equipment Screening. Allelectrical, fire risers and/or
mechanicalequipment shallbe screenedfrom public view.
Anyroof-mounted equipment shall be completelyscreened
fromviewby materialsarchitecturallycompatiblewith the
building and to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director. The BuildingPermit plans shallshow
the location ofall equipment and screening for review and
approval by the Director of CommunityDevelopment.
PL Building Permit
Issuance
and
Through
Completion/
On-going
17. Colors. Theexteriorpaint colorsofthe buildingshall be in
compliancewith theColor andMaterialBoardapproved with
the project plans. The Applicant shallpaintsmallportions of
the building the approvedcolors for review and approval by
the Director of CommunityDevelopment priorto paintingthe
entirebuilding, whoseapprovalshall notbe unreasonably
withheld.
PL Occupancy
18. Master Sign Program. A Master Sign Program shallbe
applied for and approved for allprojectrelated signage
including, butnotlimited to, communityidentificationsignage,
addresssignage, directionalsignage, parkingsignage, speed
limitsignage, & othersignagedeemednecessary by theCity.
PL Installation of
Signs
19. Development Agreement. To the extent it remains in effect,
the Applicant/Developer shallcomplywith all applicable
sections of the Master DevelopmentAgreement forthe
Dublin Transit Center adoptedasOrdinance No. 5-03.
PL BuildingPermit
Issuance
20. Affordable Housing Agreement. The Applicant/Developer
shallenter intoan AffordableHousing Agreement withthe
City to ensure that theaffordableunits described below
remain affordable for 55 years andthatother provisions of
Chapter 8.68 ofthe DublinMunicipal Code (Inclusionary
ZoningRegulations) aresatisfied. The agreement shall also
includeprovisions toensurethatthe units remain affordable
in the event that the affordableunitsaresoldas
ADM, PL BuildingPermit
Issuance
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 105
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
8
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
condominiumunits. Such agreementshall be recorded to
ensure it has priorityover and is not subordinate toanyother
recorded document affecting the property.
21. Inclusionary Zoning Requirements. The
Applicant/Developer shallprovide a minimum of10%
moderate income units. Unit affordability shall be between
80% and120% of thearea medianincome. Affordable unit
types (i.e. 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, 3 bedroom, etc.) shall be
equallydispersedwith the same ratioas the marketrateunits
in accordancewith the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations. Any
changes to the affordableunits mustfirstbe reviewed and
approved by the CommunityDevelopmentDirector.
PL Through
Completion &
On-going
22. MitigationMonitoring Program. The Applicant/Developer
shallcomply with the Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation
MonitoringProgramincluding all mitigationmeasures, action
programs, and implementationmeasures on file with the
Community DevelopmentDepartment.
PL Dublin Transit
CenterEIR
Mitigation
Monitoring
Program
23. Sound Attenuation. The Applicant/Developer shall submit a
site specificacousticreport to be prepared by a qualified
acousticalconsultant. Theacousticreport shall include
detailedidentification ofnoise exposure levels on the
individual project siteand a listing ofspecific measures to
reduce bothinteriorandexteriornoiselevels to normally
acceptablelevelsincluding but notlimited to glazingand
ventilation systems, construction of noise barriersand use of
buildings to shield noise.
PL BuildingPermit
Issuance
24. Final building and site development plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Community Development
Department staff prior tothe issuance of a buildingpermit.
All suchplansshallinsure:
a. That standardresidential security requirementsas
establishedby the DublinPoliceDepartmentare
provided.
b. That ramps, specialparkingspaces, signing, and other
appropriate physical features for the disabled, are
providedthroughout the sitefor all publiclyused
facilities.
c. That exterior lighting of the building and siteis not
directedontoadjacentpropertiesand the light source is
shielded from directoffsite viewing.
d. That all mechanicalequipment, includingairconditioning
condensers, electrical and gas meters, are
architecturallyscreened fromview, andthat electrical
transformersare either undergroundorarchitecturally
screened.
e. That all vents, gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc., are
painted to match the color of adjacentsurface.
f. That all materialsandcolorsare to be as approved by
the DublinCommunity Development Department. Once
constructed or installed, all improvementsare tobe
maintained in accordance withthe approved plans. Any
PL BuildingPermit
Issuance
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 106
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
9
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
changes, whichaffect the exteriorcharacter, shall be
resubmitted to the Dublin Community Development
Department for approval.
g. That all exteriorarchitecturalelementsnot detailed on
the plans be finished in a style and inmaterials in
harmony withthe exterior ofthe building. All materials
shallwrap tothe inside corners and terminate ata
perpendicular wall plane.
h. That all other publicagencies that requirereview of the
projectare supplied withcopies ofthe final buildingand
site plansandthat compliance is obtainedwith at least
theirminimumCoderequirements.
25. Parking Structure. Theparkingstructure shall be secure
and controlled by electronicallycontrolledgates. The parking
structure shall be well lit, with the ceilingpainted white to
enhancebrightness. Blindcornersin the parkingstructure
shall be provided with shatterproofconvexmirrors to improve
visibility for both operators of vehicles and pedestrians.
PL, PO Occupancy &
On-going
LANDSCAPING
26. Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans. Finallandscape
plans, irrigation system plans, tree preservation techniques,
and guarantees, shallbe reviewed and approved by the
Dublin PlanningDivision prior tothe issuance ofthe building
permit. All such submittals shall be reviewed and approved
by the CityEngineer andthe CommunityDevelopment
Director. Plans shall be generally consistent withthe
PreliminaryLandscapedrawingsincluded in the Project Plan
Set prepared by FletcherStudio received by the Planning
Division on August 30, 2017, except as modified by the
Conditions listed below oras required by the Community
Development Director to address specific site constraints or
conditions. The FinalLandscape Plansshallinsure:
a. That plant material is utilizedwhichwill be capable of
healthygrowth within the given range of soil and climate.
b. Thatproposed landscapescreening is ofa heightand
density so that it provides a positive visual impactwithin
threeyearsfrom the time of planting.
c. Thatunlessunusual circumstancesprevail, alltreeson
thesiteshall be a minimum of15 gallons in size. All
trees that are onthe exteriorbuildingperimeter shall be
24” box minimum, with at least 30% at 36” box or
greater. All shrubsshall be 5 gallonminimum.
d. That a plan for an automaticirrigationsystem be
provided which assures thatall plants get adequate
water. In unusual circumstances, and ifapproved by
Staff, a manual or quickcouplersystem maybe used.
e. That concrete curbing is tobeusedat the edges of all
plantersand paving surfaceswhereapplicable.
f. That allcut and fill slopes conform to the conditions
detailedin the Site Development Review packet.
PL Landscapeplan
approval and
installation
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 107
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
10
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
g. That a guarantee fromthe owners or contractorsshall be
requiredguaranteeing all shrubs andground cover, all
trees, andthe irrigationsystem for oneyear.
h. That a permanent maintenance agreement on all
landscapingwill be required from the owner insuring
regular irrigation, fertilizationandweedabatement, if
applicable.
27. Landscaping at Street/Drive Aisle Intersections.
Landscapingshall not obstruct the sightdistance of
motorists, pedestrians or bicyclists. Except for trees,
landscaping (and/orlandscapestructuressuchaswalls) at
driveaisleintersectionsshall notbe taller than30 inches
above thecurb. Landscapingshall bekeptat a minimum
height and fullnessgivingpatrol officers and thegeneral
public surveillance capabilities of thearea.
PL Ongoing
28. Plant Clearances. All treesplantedshallmeet the following
clearances:
a. 6’ from the face of buildingwalls or roofeaves.
b. 7’ from fire hydrants, storm drains, sanitarysewersand/or
gas lines.
c. 5’ from topof wing of driveways, mailboxes, water,
telephone and/orelectrical mains
d. 15’ fromstopsigns, street or curbsignreturns.
e. 15’ fromeitherside of streetlights.
PL Landscapeplan
approval and
installation
29. Landscaping. Applicant/Developer shall construct all
landscapingwithin the site and along the project frontage.
PL, PWLandscapeplan
approval and
installation
30. Backflow Prevention Devices. The LandscapePlan shall
show the location ofall backflow preventiondevises. The
locationand screening ofthe backflow preventiondevices
shall be reviewed and approved byCitystaff.
PL, PW, F Landscapeplan
approval and
installation
31. Root Barriers and Tree Staking. The landscape plansshall
providedetailsshowing root barriers and tree stakingwill be
installedwhich meet current City specifications.
PL, PWLandscapeplan
approval and
installation
32. Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The Applicant/
Developer shall submitwrittendocumentation to the Public
Works Department (in the form of a Landscape
Documentation Package and otherrequireddocuments) that
the development conforms to the City’s Water Efficient
LandscapingOrdinance.
PL Landscapeplan
approval and
installation
BUILDING – PROJECT SPECIFIC
33. Building Codes andOrdinances. All projectconstruction
shallconform to all buildingcodesandordinances in effect at
the time of buildingpermit.
B Through
Completion
34. Phased Occupancy Plan. If occupancy is requested to
occurinphases, thenall physicalimprovementswithineach
phaseshall be required tobe completedprior to occupancy
ofanyunit within that phaseexcept for items specifically
excluded inan approvedPhasedOccupancy Plan, or minor
handworkitems, approved by the Department of Community
Development. The PhasedOccupancyPlan shall be
submitted to the Directors of CommunityDevelopmentand
Public Works for reviewandapproval a minimum of60 days
prior to the request forany occupancy the building. No
B Occupancy of
any affected
building
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 108
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
11
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
individual spaceshallbe occupieduntil the adjoining area is
finished, safe, accessible, and provided with all reasonable
expectedservices and amenities, andseparated from
remainingadditional constructionactivity. Subjectto
approval ofthe Director of Community Development, the
completion of landscaping maybe deferreddue to inclement
weatherwith the postingof a bond for the value of the
deferred landscaping andassociatedimprovements.
35. Building Permits. To apply for building permits,
Applicant/Developer shallsubmitelectronic plans andspecs
andthe number ofhard copiesas determined by the Building
Official for plan check. Eachsetof plans shall haveattached
an annotatedcopy of these Conditions of Approval. The
notationsshallclearlyindicatehow all Conditions of Approval
will be or havebeencompliedwith. Constructionplanswill
notbe acceptedwithout the annotated resolutions attached
to eachsetofplans. Applicant/Developer will be responsible
for obtainingthe approvals of all participating non-City
agencies prior to the issuance of building permits.
B BuildingPermit
Issuance
36. Construction Drawings. Construction plansshall be fully
dimensioned (includingbuildingelevations) accuratelydrawn
depicting all existing and proposedconditions onsite), and
prepared and signed by a Californialicensed Architect or
Engineer. All structural calculations shallbe prepared and
signed by a CalifornialicensedArchitectorEngineer. The
site plan, landscape plan and details shallbe consistent with
eachother.
B Building Permit
Issuance
37. Air Conditioning Units. Air conditioning units and
ventilation ductsshall be screened from public viewwith
materialscompatible to the mainbuilding. Units shall be
permanentlyinstalled on concrete pads or other non-movable
materialsapproved by the Chief BuildingOfficial and Director
of Community Development. Air conditioning unitsshall be
located in accordance withthePD text.
B Occupancy
38. Temporary Fencing. TemporaryConstruction fencingshall
be installedalong the perimeter of allworkunder
construction.
B Through
Completion
39. Addressing
a. Provide a site planwith theCityof Dublin’s address grid
overlaid on the plans (1” to 30’ scale). Highlight all
exterior dooropenings on plans (front, rear, garage, etc.).
3 copies on full sizesheetsand 3 copies reduced sheets.
Prior to release of addresses)
b. Provide plan for display of addresses. The Building
Official shallapproveplanprior to issuance of the building
permit. (Prior to permitting)
c. Provide floor plans detailingeach unit for addressing to
the Building Official. The Applicant/Developer has the
option of providingapartmentnumberlayout at the timeof
submittal. 3 copies on full sizesheets and3 copies
reducedsheets. If the Applicant/Developerprovides a
draft ofthe apartment numbers, the copiesshallinclude
the draft andblank pages. (Prior to permitting)
d. Addresssignageshall be provided as per the Dublin
B Various
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 109
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
12
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
Residential Security Code. (Occupancy ofany Unit)
e. Exterior addressnumbersshall be backlit andbe posted
insuch a waythattheymaybe seen fromthe street.
Prior to occupancy)
40. Engineer Observation. The Engineer of record shallbe
retained to provideobservationservices for all components of
the lateral and verticaldesign of the building, including
nailing, hold-downs, straps, shear, roof diaphragm and
structural frameof building. A writtenreportshall be
submitted totheCity Inspector priorto scheduling the final
frame inspection.
B Scheduling the
FinalFrame
Inspection
41. Foundation. GeotechnicalEngineer for the soils reportshall
review and approve the foundationdesign. A lettershall be
submitted tothe Building Division on the approval.
B BuildingPermit
Issuance
42. Green Building.
GreenBuildingmeasuresas detailed in the SDRpackage
maybe adjusted priorto master plan checkapplication
submittalwith prior approval fromtheCity’s GreenBuilding
Officialprovided thatthedesign of the project complies with
theCity of Dublin’s GreenBuildingOrdinanceandState Law
as applicable. In addition, all changesshall be reflected in
the Master Plans. (ThroughCompletion)
The GreenBuilding checklist shallbe included in the master
plans. The checklistshalldetail what GreenPointsarebeing
obtainedandwhere the information is found within the
master plans. (Prior to first permit).
Prior to final, the projectshallsubmit a completed checklist
with appropriateverification that all GreenPointsrequired by
7.94 of the DublinMunicipalCodehave beenincorporated.
ThroughCompletion)
Developer may choose self-certificationor certification by a
third party as permitted by the Dublin Municipal Code.
Applicant shallinformtheGreen Building Official of method of
certification priorto release ofthe first permit in each
subdivision / neighborhood.
B Various
43. Copies of Approved Plans. Applicant shallprovide City with
2 reduced (1/2 size) copies ofthe City of Dublinstamped
approved plan.
B 30 days after
permit & each
revision
issuance
44. Cool Roofs. Flat roofareas shallhavetheirroofingmaterial
coatedwith light coloredgravelorpaintedwithlightcolored
or reflective materialdesignedforCool Roofs.
B Through
Completion
45. Solar Zone – CA Energy Code. Show the location ofthe
Solar Zoneon the site plan. Detail the orientation of the
SolarZone. This information shall be shownin the master
plan check onthe overallsiteplan. This condition of
approvalwill be waived if the project meetstheexceptions
provided in theCA Energy Code.
B Through
Completion
46. Accessible Parking. The required number of parkingstalls,
the design and location ofthe accessibleparkingstallsshall
be as required by theCA Building Code.
B Through
Completion
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 110
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
13
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
47. Emergency Access
VehicleGates. Privateroadsandparkingareas or structures
controlledbyunmannedmechanicalparkingtype gates shall
be providedwith police emergencyaccessby Opticom LED
Emitter and providingthe gate access code for distribution to
Emergency responders.
The control box for the codedeviceshall bemounted on a
controlpedestalconsisting ofa metal post/pipe, whichshall
be installed at a heightof36to42 inches to the center of the
keypadand a minimum of15feet (4.6m) from the entry / exit
gate. It shall be located onthe driver’s side of theroad or
driveway and accessibleinsuch a manneras to notrequirea
person to exit their vehicle to reach it, nor to drive onthe
wrongside oftheroad or driveway, not to require any back-
up movements in order toenter / exit thegate.
The gates accessesdevices shallbe designedandinstalled
to allow for entry through the vehicular gate underthree
different and uniquesituations:
a. The system in servicesand undernormal operations.
b. A power failurehas occurredand battery powered
convenience opensystemsare employed.
c. A power failurehas occurred andthe convenience
open system hasfailed (dead or low charged battery).
B Prior to
Occupancy and
through the life
ofthe project
48. 60-Foot No Build Covenant. Pursuant to Dublin Municipal
Code Section 7.32.130, the owner shall file with the Building
Official a Covenant and Agreement RegardingMaintenance
of Yards for an Oversized Building binding such owner, his
heirs, and assignees, to setasidea60-foot requiredyard as
unobstructedspacehaving no improvements. After
execution by the owner and Building Official, suchcovenant
shall be recorded in the AlamedaCounty Recorder’s Office,
and shallcontinue in effect so long as an oversized building
remains or unless otherwise released by authority of the
BuildingOfficial.
B Permitting
49. EmergencyResponderRadio Coverage Requirement.
Installation of an emergency responder radiocoverage
equipmentshall be determined by theFireCode Officialand
the Chief of Police. If installation of equipment is required,
the equipment shall be operation prior toany occupancy.
B, PO, F First Occupancy
FIRE
50. Fire Apparatus Roadways. Fire apparatus roadways shall
have a minimumunobstructedwidth of 20 feet and an
unobstructedverticalclearance of not less than 13feet6
inches. Roadways under36feet wide shall be postedwith
signs or shallhaveredcurbspaintedwith labels on oneside;
roadwaysunder 28feet wide shallbe posted with signsor
shallhave red curbs paintedwithlabels on bothsides of the
street as follows: “NO STOPPINGFIRELANE - CVC
22500.1”.
F Occupancy
51. Gate Approvals. Fencing andgatesthat crosspedestrian
access and exit paths as well as vehicle entranceand exit
roadsneed to be approved for fire department accessand
F BuildingPermit
Issuance & On-
going
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 111
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
14
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
egressas well as exiting provisionswhere such is applicable.
Plansneed to be submitted that clearlyshow the fencingand
gatesand details of such. This should be clearlyincorporated
as part of the site plan withdetailsprovidedasnecessary.
Automatic Gates. Allelectrically controlledgatesshall be
provided with an emergency gate over-ride key switch for fire
departmentaccess.
Provide Public Safety radiorepeaterinparkinggarage.
52. bKey Box / Switch Order Information. AFire Department
KeyBox shallbe installed atthemain entrance to the
Building. Note these locations ontheplans. The key box
should be installedapproximately 51/2feet above grade.
The box shall be sized to hold the master key to thefacility as
well askeys for rooms not accessible by the master key.
Keyboxes and switches maybe ordereddirectly from the
Knox Company at www.knoxbox.com
F Occupancy
53. FireAlarm (detection) SystemRequired. A FireAlarm-
DetectionSystem shall be installed throughout the building
so as to provide full property protection, including
combustibleconcealed spaces, as required by NFPA 72. The
system shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 72, CA
Fire, Building, Electrical, and Mechanical Codes.
If the system is intended to serve as an evacuation system,
compliancewith the horn/stroberequirements for the entire
buildingmust also bemet. All automatic fire extinguishing
systems shall be interconnected to the fire alarm system so
as to activate an alarm if activated and to monitorcontrol
valves. Delayed egress locks shall meet requirements of C.F.
F Occupancy
54. New Fire Sprinkler System & Monitoring Requirements.
In accordance with the Dublin FireCode, fire sprinklers shall
be installed in the building. The system shall be in
accordance with the NFPA 13, the CA Fire Code andCA
Building Code. Plans and specifications showing detailed
mechanical design, cut sheets, listing sheetsand hydraulic
calculations shall be submitted to the Fire Department for
approval and permit prior to installation. Compliancewith2016
CFCsection 905 for Standpipe and Section 913 for Fire
Pumps are required.
F Occupancy
55. Fire Extinguishers. Extinguishers shall be visible and
unobstructed. Signageshall be provided to indicate fire
extinguisherlocations. The number andlocation of
extinguishers shall be shown onthe plans.
F Building Permit
Issuance &
Occupancy
56. Site Plan. Thesiteplanneeds to show sufficient detail to
reflect an accurate and detailed layout ofthe site for review
and record purposes. Thesite plan willneed a scalethat will
allow sufficientdetails for reviewpurposes and include, but
notbe limited to the following:
a. The siteparkingandcirculationlayout including
fences, gates, fire lanelocationsandturnarounds.
F Building Permit
Issuance
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 112
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
15
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
b. Location of all fire appliances including fire hydrants,
fire connections, fire sprinklerrisers, andfire control
valves.
c. The location of all buildingopeningsincludingtheexit
dischargepathway for building exits. Note the location
of exitlighting for these pathways as well.
d. The location ofany overhead obstructions and their
clearances
e. The location of propertylines and assumedproperty
linesbetweenbuildings on thesame property as well
as any easements.
The site planwill also needtonote the locationanddistance
offire hydrants that are along the propertyfrontage as well as
the closesthydrants to eachside of the propertythat are
locatedalong the access roadsthatserves the property. In
addition, the improved faceof curb to face of curb or edge of
pavementwidth of the access road thatserves the property
willneed to be noted.
57. Fire Access. Fireaccess is required to be approved all-
weatheraccess. Show on the plans the location ofthe all-
weatheraccess and a description ofthe construction. Access
road must be designed to support the imposedloads offire
apparatus.
F BuildingPermit
Issuance &
Occupancy
58. Hydrants & FireFlows. Show the location ofany on-site fire
hydrants andany fire hydrantsthatare along the property
frontage as well as the closest hydrants to each side of the
property that arelocatedalong the accessroadsthat serves
this property. Provide a letter from the Dublin San Ramon
ServicesDistrictindicatingwhat the available fireflow is to
this property.
F BuildingPermit
Issuance
59. Addressing. Addressing shall be illuminatedor in an
illuminated area. The addresscharactersshall be contrasting
to their background. If address is placed on glass, the
numbers shallbe on the exterior oftheglass and a
contrasting backgroundplacedbehind the numbers.
F Occupancy
60. Building Address. The building shall be provided with all
addresses or the assignedaddressrange so as tobe clearly
visible from either direction of travelonthe street the address
references. The addresscharactersshall notbe lessthan 5
inchesinheight by 1-inchstroke. Largersizes maybe
necessarydepending onthe setbacks and visibility.
F Occupancy &
On-going
61. Fire Service AccessElevator. At least one elevator shall
comply with size and weight requirements in 2016 CBC
Chapter 30and 2016CFCsection 607.
F Occupancy &
On-going
62. AutomaticShutoffs For Ducts. Air moving systems
supplying air in excess of 2,000 cubic feet perminute to
enclosedspaceswithinbuildingsshall be equipped with an
automaticshutoff. Automatic shutoffshall be accomplished
by interrupting the powersource oftheair moving equipment
upondetection of smoke in the mainsupply air duct served
by suchequipment. Smokedetectorsshall be labeled by an
approvedagencyapprovedandlistedby California StateFire
Marshal for airduct installation and shall be installed in
F Occupancy
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 113
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
16
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
accordancewith the manufacturer’s approved installation
instructions.
Ductdetectorsshall be accessible for cleaning byproviding
accessdoors.
Duct detector locationshall be permanently and clearly
identified.
63. Stationary Storage Battery Systems. Stationary storage
batterysystemshaving an electrolytecapacity ofmore than
50 gallons for floodedleadacid, nickel cadmium and valve-
regulated lead acid, or 1,000 pounds for lithium-ion, used for
facilitystandbypower, emergency power or uninterrupted
powersupplies, shall comply with this section.
a. VRLA batterysystems shall be providedwith a listed
device or other approved method to preclude, detect
and controlthermalrunaway.
b. An approved methodand materials for the control and
neutralization of a spill of electrolyte shall be provided
in areas containingleadacid, nickel-cadmium or other
types of batterieswithfree-flowingliquid electrolyte.
c. Ventilation of stationarystoragebatterysystems shall
comply with the CaliforniaMechanical Codeas
cabinet androom rate requiredpercubic foot per
minute.
d. Equipment room andbuilding signage shall be
provided indicating thattheroomhas energized
batterysystems or circuitsandthatcorrosiveliquids
are present.
e. Cabinets shall haveexteriorlabels that identify the
manufacturer and model number ofthe system and
electrical rating ofthe contained battery system.
f. The battery systemsshall be seismically bracedin
accordancewith the California Building Code.
g. An approvedautomaticsmokedetection system shall
be installed in accordancewith CFCsection in rooms
containingstationarybatterysystems.
F Occupancy &
On-going
64. Generators.
a. Stationarygenerators for emergency and standby
powersystems shallbe listedin accordancewith UL
2200.
b. Generators shall be installedaccording to Article of
the CaliforniaElectrical Code.
c. Portable and vehiclemounted generators shall be
bonded and groundedinaccordwithArticle of the
CaliforniaElectricalCode.
d. Code requiredStandbyPowerSystemsshall be
according to the California Electrical Code.
e. Non-coderequiredoptionalstandbypowersystems
shall be according to Article 702ofthe California
Electrical Code.
f. Life safetybranch circuits shall be inaccordance with
F Occupancy &
On-going
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 114
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
17
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
Article of the California ElectricalCode.
g. All electrical wiring, devices, appliancesandother
equipmentshall bein accordwith the California
Electrical Code.
65. Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition.
a. Clearance to combustibles from temporary heating
devicesshall be maintained. Devices shall be fixed in
place andprotected from damage, dislodgementor
overturning in accordancewith the manufacturer’s
instructions.
b. Smokingshall be prohibited exceptinapproved
areas. Signs shallbeposted “NOSMOKING” in a
conspicuouslocation in eachstructure or location in
which smoking is prohibited.
c. Combustibledebris, rubbishand waste materialshall
be removedfrom buildings attheend of eachshift of
work.
d. Flammable and combustible liquidstorage areasshall
be maintained clear of combustiblevegetation and
waste materials.
F During
Construction
PUBLIC WORKS – GENERAL CONDITIONS
66. Conditions of Approval. Developershallcomplywith the
Cityof DublinPublic Works Standard Conditions of Approval
containedbelow (“StandardCondition”) unless specifically
modified by Project Specific Conditions of Approvalbelow.
PW On-going
67. Zone 7 Impervious Surface Fees. The Applicant shall
complete a “Zone7 ImperviousSurfaceFee Application” and
submit an accompanyingexhibit for review by the Public
Works Department. Fees generated by thisapplicationwill
bedueat issuance of Building Permit.
PW BuildingPermit
Issuance
PUBLIC WORKS – AGREEMENTS & BONDS
68. TractImprovement Agreement. Developer shall enter into
an ImprovementAgreementwith theCity forall public
improvements including any requiredoffsite stormdrainage
or roadwayimprovements that areneeded to serve the
development, as determined by theCity Engineer.
PW
FinalMap
Approval or
Grading Permit
Issuance
69. Security. Developer shallprovide faithful performance
security to guarantee the improvements, as determined by
theCity Engineer (Note: The performancesecurity shall
remain in effect until one year after final inspection).
PW
FinalMap
Approval or
Grading Permit
Issuance
70. O&M Agreement. The requirements of Provision C.3of the
Municipal RegionalStormwater NPDES Permit, Order No.
R2-2015-0049, require the property owner to enter into an
Agreement with theCityof Dublin to provideverificationand
assurancethat all treatmentdevices willbeproperly operated
and maintained andto guarantee the owner’s perpetual
maintenanceobligation forall stormdraininlet filters installed
as part ofthe project. The Agreement shallbe recorded
against the property and shall run with the land.
PW FinalMap
Approval
PUBLIC WORKS - PERMITS
71. EncroachmentPermit. Developer shallobtain an
EncroachmentPermit fromthe Public Works Department for
all constructionactivitywithin the publicright-of-way of any
PW Start ofWork
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 115
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
18
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
streetwhere the City has accepted the street rightof way.
The encroachment permit mayrequire surety for slurry seal
and restriping. Atthe discretion of the City Engineer an
encroachmentpermit for work specificallyincludedin an
ImprovementAgreement maynotbe required.
72. GradingPermit. Developer shallobtain a GradingPermit
from the Public Works Department for all grading. PW Start ofWork
PUBLIC WORKS – SUBMITTALS
73. Plan Submittals. All submittals of plansshallcomply with the
requirements ofthe “City of DublinPublic Works Department
Improvement Plan Submittal Requirements”, the “City of
DublinImprovement Plan ReviewCheckList,” andcurrent
PublicWorks and industry standards. A completesubmittal
of improvement plansshall includeall civil improvements,
jointtrench, streetlightingand on-site safetylighting,
landscapeplans, andall associateddocumentsas required.
The Developer shall not piecemeal the submittal by
submitting various componentsseparately.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
74. Submittals to non-City Agencies. Developerwill be
responsible for submittals and reviews to obtain the
approvals of allparticipatingnon-Cityagencies. The Alameda
County Fire Department andthe Dublin San Ramon Services
District shallapprove andsignthe Improvement Plans.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
75. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). A
HomeownersAssociation(s) shall be formedby recordation
of a declaration of Covenants, Conditions, andRestrictions to
govern use and maintenance of common areas andfacilities.
Saiddeclarationshall set forththe Association name, bylaws,
rules and regulations. The CC&Rs shallalsocontain a
provisionthatprohibits the amendment of those provisions of
the CC&Rs without City’s approval. The CC&Rsshall ensure
that there is adequate provision for maintenance, ingood
repairand on a regularbasis, the landscaping & irrigation,
decorative pavements, fences, walls, drainage, lighting,
signs, buildingexteriors, parking areas andotherrelated
improvements. The Developer shall submit a copyofthe
CC&R document to the City for review and approval relative
to theseconditions of approval.
PL, PW Final Map
Approval
76. Geotechnical Report. Developer shall submit a Design
LevelGeotechnical Report, whichincludes streetpavement
sections and gradingrecommendations.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans, and
GradingPlans
77. Ownership and Maintenance of Improvements. Applicant
shall submit an OwnershipandMaintenanceExhibit for
review and approval by PlanningDivision and PublicWorks
Department. Maintenance shall include but not be limited to,
street cleaning ofparking areaswithinCampbell Lane along
project frontage. Terms of maintenance are subject to review
and approval by theCity Engineer.
PL, PW
Final Map
Approval or
Grading Permit
Issuance
78. Approved Plan Files. Developer shallprovide the Public
Works Department a PDF format file of approved site plans,
includinggrading, improvement, landscaping & irrigation, joint
trench and lighting.
PW Approval of Site
Plans
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 116
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
19
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
79. Master Files. Developer shallprovide the Public Works
Department a digital vectorized file ofthe “master” files for
the project, in a formatacceptable totheCity Engineer.
Digital raster copies are not acceptable. Thedigital
vectorized filesshallbe in AutoCAD 14 or higher drawing
format. All objectsandentitiesinlayers shallbe coloredby
layer andnamed inEnglish. All submitted drawings shall use
the GlobalCoordinateSystem of USA, California, NAD 83
CaliforniaStatePlane, Zone III, and U.S. foot.
PW Acceptance of
Improvements
PUBLIC WORKS – EASEMENTS AND ACCESS RIGHTS
80. Abandonment of Easements. Developershallobtain
abandonment fromall applicable publicagencies of existing
easements and rights of waywithin the development that will
no longer be used.
PW
FinalMap
Approval or
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
81. Acquisition of Easements. Developer shall acquire
easements, and/orobtain rights-of-entry from the adjacent
property owners for any improvements not located on their
property. The easements and/or rights-of-entryshall be in
writing and copies furnished tothe PublicWorksDepartment.
PW
Final Map
Approval or
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
PUBLIC WORKS - GRADING
82. Grading Plan. The Grading Planshall be in conformance
withthe recommendation ofthe Geotechnical Report, the
approvedTentative Map and Site DevelopmentReview, and
the City designstandards & ordinances. In case of conflict
between thesoil engineer’s recommendationand the City
ordinances, the CityEngineershall determinewhich shall
apply.
PW Approval of
GradingPlans
83. ErosionControl Plan. A detailedErosion and Sediment
ControlPlan shallbe included withthe Grading Plan
submittal. The planshall include detailed design, location,
and maintenance criteria of all erosion andsedimentation
control measures.
PW Issuance of
Grading Permit
84. Retaining Walls. Tiebacks or structuralfabricfor retaining
wallsshall not crosspropertylines, or shall be located a
minimum of2’ below the finished grade of the upper lot.
PW Approval of
GradingPlans
PUBLIC WORKS - IMPROVEMENTS
85. Public Improvements. Thepublic improvements shall be
constructedgenerally as shown onthe TentativeMap and
Site Development Review. However, the approval of the
TentativeMap and Site Development Review is notan
approval ofthe specific designofthe drainage, sanitary
sewer, water, trafficcirculation, parking, stormwater
treatment, sidewalksandstreetimprovements.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
86. Public ImprovementConformance. All public
improvementsshallconform to theCityof Dublin Standard
Plans, currentpractices, anddesign requirements andas
approved by theCity Engineer.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
87. Public Street Slopes. Public streetsshall bea minimum 1%
slope withminimum gutterflowof 0.7% around bumpouts.
Private streetsandalleysshall bea minimum 0.5% slope.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
88. CurbReturns. CurbReturns on arterialand collector streets
shall be40-foot radius, all internal public streets curb returns PW Approval of
Improvement
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 117
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
20
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
shall be minimum 30-footradius (36-footwith bumpouts) and
privatestreets/alleysshall bea minimum 20-foot radius, oras
approved by theCity Engineer. Curbramp locations and
design shallconform tothemost current Title24 and
Americans with DisabilitiesAct requirements andas
approved by the Public WorksTraffic Engineer.
Plans
89. Decorative Pavement. Anydecorative pavers/paving
installed within City right-of-wayshall bedone to the
satisfaction oftheCity Engineer. Where decorative paving is
installed at signalizedintersections, pre-formed traffic signal
loopsshallbe put underthe decorative pavement. Decorative
pavementsshall not interferewithplacement of traffic control
devices, includingpavement markings. All turn lanestripes,
stop bars & crosswalksshall be delineatedwithconcrete
bands or color pavers tothe satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Maintenancecosts of the decorative pavingshall bethe
responsibility of the developer or future property owner.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
90. TrafficSigning and Striping. Developer shall install all
traffic signage, striping, and pavementmarkings as required
by the Public Works Department.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
91. Street Lighting. Street lightstandards andluminaries shall
be designedandinstalled or relocated as determined by the
CityEngineer. The maximum voltagedrop for streetlights is
5%.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
92. Water and Sewer Facilities. Developer shallconstruct all
potable andrecycled water and sanitary sewer facilities
required to serve the project in accordance with DSRSD
master plans, standards, specificationsandrequirements.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
93. FireHydrants. Fire hydrantlocations shall be approved by
the AlamedaCounty Fire Department. Araisedreflector blue
traffic marker shall be installed in the streetoppositeeach
hydrant.
PW
Approval of
Grading/Improv
ementPlans
94. Storm DrainInlet Markers. Allon-sitestormdraininlets
must be markedwithstormdrainmarkers that read: “No
dumping, drains to creek.” The stencils may be purchased
from the Public Work Department.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
95. Utilities. Developer shallconstructgas, electric, telephone,
cable TV, and communicationimprovementswithin the
fronting streets and as necessary to serve the project and the
future adjacent parcelsas approved by the CityEngineer and
the variousPublicUtilityagencies.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
96. Utility Locations. All electric, telephone, cable TV, and
communications utilities, shallbe placedundergroundin
accordancewith the City policies and ordinances. All utilities
shall belocatedand providedwithinpublic utility easements
or public serviceseasements and sized to meetutility
companystandards.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
97. Utility Vaults and Boxes. Allutility vaults, boxes, and
structures, unless specifically approvedotherwise by theCity
Engineer, shall be underground and placed in landscaped
areas and screened from public view. Prior to JointTrench
Plan approval, landscape drawings shallbe submitted tothe
City showing the location of all utility vaults, boxes, and
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 118
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
21
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
structures and adjacentlandscapefeaturesand plantings.
The Joint Trench Plans shall be signed by theCity Engineer
priorto construction ofthe jointtrenchimprovements.
98. Street Signs. Developershallfurnishandinstallstreetname
signs, trafficsigns and markingsfor the project asrequiredby
theCity Engineer.
PUBLIC WORKS - CONSTRUCTION
99. Erosion Control Implementation. The Erosionand
SedimentControl Planshallbe implemented between
October 1standApril 30thunless otherwise allowedinwriting
by theCity Engineer. TheDeveloperwill be responsiblefor
maintainingerosion and sedimentcontrolmeasures for one
year following the City’s acceptance ofthe improvements.
PW On-goingas
needed
100. ArchaeologicalFinds. If archaeologicalmaterials are
encountered during construction, constructionwithin 100feet
of these materials shall be halteduntil a professional
Archaeologist who is certified by the Society of California
Archaeology (SCA) or the Society of Professional
Archaeology (SOPA) has hadan opportunity to evaluate the
significance ofthe find and suggestappropriatemitigation
measures.
PW On-going as
needed
101. Construction Activities. Constructionactivities, including
the idling, maintenance, and warming up of equipment, shall
be limited to Monday throughFriday, andnon-City holidays,
between the hours of7:30 a.m. and 6:00p.m. except as
otherwiseapproved by the CityEngineer. Extendedhoursor
Saturdaywork will be consideredby the CityEngineer ona
case-by-casebasis. To request Saturdaywork, Owner shall
submit the request to City Engineer by 5:00p.m. Pacific Time
Tuesday and receive a response by 5:00p.m. Pacific Time
on Thursday. Note thatthe construction hours of operation
within the publicright ofway are morerestrictive.
PW On-going as
needed
102. Temporary Fencing. TemporaryConstruction fencingshall
be installedalong the perimeter of all work underconstruction
to separate the constructionoperationfrom the public. All
constructionactivities shall be confined within the fenced
area. Constructionmaterials and/or equipment shallnotbe
operated orstored outside ofthe fencedarea or within the
public right-of-way unless approved in advance by theCity
Engineer.
PW
Startof
Construction
and On-going
103. Construction Noise Management Plan. Developer shall
prepare a constructionnoisemanagement plan thatidentifies
measures to be taken to minimizeconstruction noise on
surroundingdevelopedproperties. Theplan shall include
hours of construction operation, use of mufflers on
constructionequipment, speed limit for constructiontraffic,
haulroutes and identify a noise monitor. Specific noise
managementmeasures shall be provided prior to project
construction.
PW
Startof
Construction
Implementation,
and On-going
as needed
104. TrafficControl Plan. Closing ofany existingpedestrian
pathwayand/or sidewalk during construction shall be
implementedthrough a City approvedTraffic ControlPlan
and shall be donewith the goal of minimizing the impact on
pedestriancirculation.
PW
Start of
Construction
andOn-going
as needed
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 119
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
22
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
105. ConstructionTraffic Interface Plan. Developershall
prepare a plan for construction trafficinterface with public
traffic onany existing public street. Construction traffic and
parking maybe subject to specificrequirements by theCity
Engineer.
PW
Start of
Construction;
Implementation,
andOn-going
as needed
106. Pest Control. Developer shall be responsible for controlling
any rodent, mosquito, or otherpest problemdue to
construction activities.
PW On-going
107.
Dust Control Measures. Developershall be responsible for
watering or otherdust-palliative measures tocontroldust as
conditions warrant or as directedby theCity Engineer.
PW
Start of
Construction;
Implementation
On-goingas
needed
108. Construction Traffic and Parking. All constructionrelated
parkingshall beoff streetin an area provided by the
Developerand willbe in the garage ofthe structure oncethe
podium concrete is complete. Construction traffic and
parkingshall be provided in a mannerapproved by the City
Engineer to minimizeimpact on BARTpatrons.
PW On-going
PUBLIC WORKS – NPDES
109. Stormwater Treatment. The projectqualifies as a Category
C Special Project – Transit-OrientedDevelopment as defined
in the NPDESMunicipalRegional Permit (MRP) with a
maximum LowImpact Development (LID) treatment
reduction credit of ninetypercent (90%). The projectshall
treat a minimum often percent (10%) ofthe total project
impervious area with LID treatment measuresasdefinedin
the MRP. Planting withinallbioretentionareasorsimilar LID
landscape-based stormwater treatmentmeasures shall
adhere to the guidelines summarized inthe most current
version of Appendix B tothe C.3 Stormwater Technical
Guidance Handbookpublished by the Alameda CountyClean
WaterProgram.
PW
Building Permit
Issuance and
Grading Permit
Issuance
110. Media Filters. All media filters used for stormwater
treatment shall have beencertified under the Washington
State Department of EcologyTechnicalAssessment Protocol
Ecology (TAPE) GeneralUse LevelDesignation (GULD) for
Basic Treatment. All media filters shallbe hydraulically sized
based onthe criteria specified in the MunicipalRegional
Permit Provision C.3.d and the designoperation rate for
which the product received TAPE GULDcertification for
Basic Treatment.
PW
Building Permit
Issuance and
Grading Permit
Issuance
111. NOI and SWPPP. Prior to any clearing or grading,
Developer shallprovide the Cityevidence that a Notice of
Intent (NOI) hasbeensent tothe California StateWater
Resources ControlBoard per the requirements of theNPDES
Permit. A copy ofthe Storm Water PollutionPrevention Plan
SWPPP) shall be provided tothe PublicWorks Department
and be keptat the construction site.
PW
Start of Any
Construction
Activities
112. SWPPP. TheStorm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
SWPPP) shallidentify the BestManagementPractices
BMPs) appropriate totheproject constructionactivities. The
SWPPPshallinclude the erosion and sediment control
measures in accordancewith the regulations outlined in the
PW
SWPPPtobe
PreparedPrior
to Approval of
Improvement
Plans;
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 120
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
23
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
most currentversion ofthe ABAGErosionandSediment
ControlHandbookor StateConstructionBest Management
Practices Handbook. The Developer is responsible for
ensuringthat all contractorsimplement all stormwater
pollutionpreventionmeasuresin the SWPPP.
Implementation
Prior to Start of
Construction
andOn-going
as needed
113.
Stormwater Management Plan. Construction Plans shall
include a Stormwater Management Plan subject to review
and approval oftheCity Engineer.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plansand
BuildingPermit
Issuance
114. TrashCapture. Specific information is required on the
construction planset demonstrating how MRP Provision C.10
trash capture) requirements are met. Trash capturedevices
to be usedshall be listed and detailsshown on plans.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans and
Building Permit
Issuance
PUBLIC WORKS – SPECIAL CONDITIONS
115. Approval. The Tentative Map approval for Tract8437, for
Condominium Purposes, PLPA 2017-00036, establishes the
design concepts and expectations for the TentativeTract
Map. The Tentative TractMap shall generallyconform to the
SDR and Tentative Mapplanssubmittedby BKF Engineers,
submittedAugust 30, 2017, onfile with the Community
DevelopmentDepartment, and otherplans, text, and
diagrams relating to this TentativeTract Map, unless
modified by the Conditions of Approvalcontained herein.
PL, PW On-going
116. Final Map Recordation. Final Map8437 shall recordprior
to the issuance of a buildingpermit.
PW Building Permit
Issuance
117. Wells or Exploratory Boring. Anywaterwell, cathodic
protectionwell, or exploratory boring onthe projectproperty
must be properlyabandoned, backfilled, or maintained in
accordance withapplicable groundwaterprotection
ordinances. Foradditionalinformation contact Alameda
County FloodControl, Zone 7.
PW Through
Completion
118. StormwaterRequirements Checklist. Applicant shall
submit an updated “StormwaterRequirementsChecklist” and
accompanyingrequireddocumentation.
PW Approval of
GradingPlans
119. Sidewalks. All publicsidewalksmust be within City right-of-
way or in a pedestrianaccess easement unlessapprovedby
theCity Engineer.
PW FinalMap
Approval or
Issuanceof
Grading Permit
120. Ownership of Campbell Lane Public Right-of-way.
Applicant shall accept ownership of a portion of Campbell
Lanepublicright-of-way, asgenerallyshown onthe exhibit
submitted to the Community Development Department on
October 2, 2017, tothe property owner, reserving a public
access easement and utilityeasementover theareaand
allowing for public andutility agencies to continuetheir
current useofthe streetright-of-way. The exactdimensions
and location of thisportion of land and the terms of the
quitclaim deedand easementshall be as reasonably agreed
upon by theCity and the Applicant. Applicantshallcooperate
in the preparation of all necessarydocumentation to process
and effectuate the propertytransferand easement
PW BuildingPermit
Issuance or
Approval of
Grading Plans
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 121
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
24
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
dedication. The Applicantshallconstruct a physical
improvement at streetleveldelineating the area quitclaimed.
Delineation is subject to reviewandapprovalby the City
Engineer.
121. ParkingStructure Access Gates and Security Fencing.
The geometric configuration and circulation for the gated
entrancein the parkingstructureshall be designedasfollows
to the satisfaction oftheCity Engineer.
Providedetails ondesign and functionofthe fence
andgates within the parkingstructure.
Provide a pedestrianaccess atthe security gate
meeting accessibility requirements.
PW BuildingPermit
Issuance
122. Guest Parking. The Developer shalloperate the parking
structurein a manner that allows guests to obtain access and
park inside.
PW
Building Permit
Issuance
123. ParkingStructure. Theparking structure shall comply with
the parking structure requirements of the Off-streetParking
Ordinance, unless otherwisespecified in these conditions of
approval, and shallmeet the followingrequirements:
MinimumParkingStallDimensionsshall be aslisted
below:
o StandardStalls: 9’ x 18’
o CompactStalls: 8.5’ x 17’
o Additional 2.5’ widthadjacent to walls or other
obstructions
o Parking space width of 9’ will be measured from
the edge of columns.
o Accessiblestalls shall conform to current
accessibility requirements with no reduction
granted
Provide hose bibs as needed for periodic wash down
of within the parking structure.
Insidethe parkinggarage, provide a turnaround
space for vehicles atthe interiorgateandfencethat
restrictsthrough vehicle access. Vehicles
approaching the gate and fenceneed an area to turn
around if no parking is available.
Indicateguest parking andleasing office parkingstalls
within the structure.
PW Building Permit
Issuance
124. Lighting.
The Applicant/Developer shallprepare a photometric
plantothe reasonablesatisfaction of the City
Engineer, Director of Community Development, the
City’s ConsultingLandscape Architect and Dublin
Police Services.
The photometric plan shallshow lightinglevelswhich
takeinto consideration, poles, low walls andother
obstructions.
Exteriorlighting shallbe provided within the parking
structure andonthe building, and shall be of a design
and placement soas notto causeglare onto adjoining
properties, businesses or to vehicular traffic.
PL, PW,
PO
BuildingPermit
Issuance
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 122
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
25
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
Lighting usedafter daylight hours shallbe adequate
to provide for security needs.
The planshallshowmeasurements for theparking
structure, connectingpaths, pedestrianbridges,
common areas and outside of residentialareas.
Lightinginside ofthe parkingstructureshall be ofa
levelwhich is highenoughto promotesafetywithin
the structure, and at nopoint should the lightinglevel
be below 1.0 foot-candle.
The parkinglotlightsshallalso be designed to
eliminate any pockets ofhigh & low illuminated areas.
Prior to Occupancy, theapplicantshallrequest an
inspection ofthe lighting levels in the structure to
determine if lighting is sufficient. If additionallights
are required to be installed to meet the1.0foot-
candlerequirement, the Applicant shall do so prior to
Occupancy.
125. Parking Structure Drainage. Construction drawingsshall
includeinformation to demonstratehow runoff within the
parking structurewill be captured. All runofffrom within the
parking structure shall be collected prior to exitingthe
structure, and discharged to a connection tothe sanitary
sewersystem per DSRSDrequirements.
PW Building Permit
Issuance or
Approval of
Grading/Improv
ementPlans
126. On-Street Parking Removal. Remove 20feetof parallel
parking (one space) adjacent tothe parking structure
entrance along the north side of Campbell Lane.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
127. Sidewalkand Frontage Grading. Sidewalks within the
publicright-of-wayshallhave a maximumcross slopeof
below 2.0%. The crossslopeshall be maintained for a
minimumdistance of one foot behind the frontage sidewalks
where there is adjacentlandscaping, stairs or pathway.
PW Approval of
Grading/Improv
ementPlans
128. Existing Crosswalk Relocation on Campbell Lane. The
existingmarkedcrosswalk at the curvedsection of Campbell
Lane (uncontrolledcorner) shall be relocatedoutside the
horizontalcurve, subject to reviewandapproval oftheCity
Engineer.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
129. Common Area Improvements. Common area
improvementsowned or maintained by the Homeowners
AssociationorPropertyManager are subject to reviewand
approvalby the CityEngineer prior to Final Map approvaland
shall be includedin theTract ImprovementAgreement. Such
improvementsinclude, but are not limited to: curb & gutter,
pavement areas, sidewalks, accessrampsand driveways;
parkingspaces; streetlightsand appurtenances, drainage
facilities, utilities, landscape and irrigationfacilities, common
area landscaping, stormwater treatmentfacilities, striping and
signage, andfire hydrants.
PW BuildingPermit
Issuance or
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
130. Signing and Striping Plan. Constructiondrawings shall
includesigning and striping plans, subject to the review and
approval ofthe City Engineer.
PW BuildingPermit
Issuance and
Improvement
Plan Approval
131. Curb Ramps. All pedestrianramps shallbe unidirectional
ramps, providing access to a single crosswalk, including the PW Improvement
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 123
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
26
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
intersection of Campbell Lane and DeMarcusBoulevard.
The designshown on the submittedSite Plan shall be
revised tomeet the unidirectional ramp requirement.
Plan Approval
132. Existing Curb and Gutter. Existing curbandgutter along
the project frontages of the publicrights-of-wayshall be
evaluated for condition and compliancewithcurrentPublic
Works standards, and shall be repaired or replacedwith the
development of the site, as determined by theCity Engineer.
Constructiondrawings shall showrepair or replacement
required.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
133. Existing Pavement at PrivateDrive. Existingpavement
within the private drivealong thenorth side ofthe project
shall be evaluated for conditionandcompliancewith current
PublicWorksstandards, and shall be repaired or replaced
withthe development of the site, as determined by the City
Engineer. Construction drawingsshallshow repair or
replacement required.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
134. Remediation of Adjacent Public Streets. The Applicant
shall be responsible for remediation of the adjacent public
streets, damaged by any constructionactivity (including utility
trenchcuts), as determined by the CityEngineer.
Remediation mayinclude pavementtreatment suchas a
slurry seal or a grind and overlay.
PW Acceptance of
Improvements
135. Existing Storm Drainage System. The Applicant shall
verify all downstreamstormdrainfacilities are adequately
sizedprior to discharging to any off-site stormdrainage
system. Ifthe downstream system is not adequately sized,
the Applicant shall be responsible for improving the
downstreamsystem to accommodate the projectrunoff.
PW
Approval of
Grading/Improv
ementPlans
136. Standard General Notes. StandardGeneral Notes and
project specificnotes shall be shown onthe construction
drawing set in accordancewith current Public Works
standards.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
137. Existing Condition Information. The constructiondrawing
setshallprovide all existinginformationalongproject
perimeter and public street frontage, includingexisting curb
elevations and gutterslopes alongadjacentstreets.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
138. Proposed Design Information. The constructiondrawing
setshall provide all proposed information, typicalslopes at
walkways and parkingstructure, overland release from site,
and showhowrunofffrom site will be collected and conveyed
upstream of publicsidewalks.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
139. Sections and Details. Constructiondrawings shallinclude
necessarysectionsanddetails toclarify construction, as
determined bythe Public Works Department.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
140. Gradingand Drainage. Constructiondrawingsshallinclude
necessaryinformation toclarify grading, drainage and
overlandrelease of runoffwithinopen air areassuchas
plazas, lounges, bridge, andlandscapeareas.
PW Approval of
Grading/Improv
ementPlans
DUBLINSAN RAMOM SERVICES DISTRICT
141. dPrior to issuance ofany buildingpermit, complete
improvementplansshall be submitted to DSRSD that
conform to the requirements of the Dublin San Ramon
DSRSD Issuanceof
Building Permits
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 124
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
27
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
Services District Code, the DSRSD “StandardProcedures,
Specifications and Drawings for Design and Installation of
Water and WastewaterFacilities”, all applicableDSRSD
Master Plans and all DSRSDpolicies.
142. Allmains shall be sized to providesufficientcapacity to
accommodate futureflow demands in addition to each
developmentproject’s demand. Layoutand sizingof mains
shall be in conformancewithDSRSD utility masterplanning.
DSRSD Issuanceof
Improvement
Plans
143. Sewers shall be designed to operatebygravity flowto
DSRSD’s existing sanitary sewersystem. Pumping of
sewage is discouraged andmay only be allowed under
extreme circumstances following a case by casereviewwith
DSRSD staff. Any pumpingstation will require specific
review and approval by DSRSD of preliminary designreports,
designcriteria, and final plansandspecifications. The
DSRSDreserves the right to requirepayment of present
worth 20 year maintenance costsas well as other conditions
within a separateagreementwith the applicant for anyproject
that requires a pumpingstation.
DSRSD Issuanceof
Improvement
Plans
144. Domestic andfire protectionwaterlinesystems for Tracts or
CommercialDevelopments shall be designed to be looped or
interconnected to avoid dead endsections in accordance
with requirements ofthe DSRSD Standard Specifications and
sound engineeringpractice.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
145. DSRSD policyrequires publicwater and sewer lines to be
located in publicstreets rather than in off-streetlocations to
the fullestextent possible. If unavoidable, then public sewer
or watereasements must be established over the alignment
of each publicsewer or waterline in anoff-streetorprivate
street location to provide accessforfuture maintenance
and/or replacement.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
146. Prior to approval by the City ofa gradingpermit or a site
developmentpermit, the locations and widths of allproposed
easement dedications for water andsewer lines shall be
submitted toand approved by DSRSD.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
147. All easement dedications for DSRSDfacilities shall be by
separate instrumentirrevocably offered to DSRSD or byoffer
of dedication on the Final Map.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
148. Prior to issuance by the City of anyBuilding Permitor
ConstructionPermit by the Dublin San RamonServices
District, whichevercomes first, allutilityconnection fees
includingDSRSDand Zone 7, planchecking fees, inspection
fees, connection fees, and fees associatedwith a wastewater
dischargepermit shall be paid to DSRSD in accordancewith
the rates andschedulesestablished in the DSRSDCode.
DSRSD Issuance of
BuildingPermits
149. Prior to issuance by the Cityofany BuildingPermitor
ConstructionPermitby the Dublin San Ramon Services
District, whichever comes first, all improvementplansfor
DSRSD facilities shallbe signedby the DistrictEngineer.
Each drawing of improvement plans shallcontain a signature
blockfor the District Engineer indicating approval ofthe
sanitary sewer or waterfacilitiesshown. Prior to approvalby
the DistrictEngineer, the applicant shall pay all required
DSRSD fees, and provide an engineer’s estimate of
DSRSD Issuanceof
Building Permits
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 125
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
28
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
constructioncosts for the sewer and watersystems, a
performancebond, a one-yearmaintenancebond, and a
comprehensive general liabilityinsurance policy in the
amountsandforms that are acceptable to DSRSD. The
applicant shallallow at least 15 working days for final
improvement drawingsreviewed by DSRSD before signature
by the District Engineer.
150. No sewerline or waterline constructionshall be permitted
unless the properutilityconstructionpermit has beenissued
by DSRSD. A construction permitwillonly be issued after all
oftheitems in the condition immediatelyabovehavebeen
satisfied.
DSRSD Issuanceof
Improvement
Plans
151. The applicant shall hold DSRSD, its Board of Directors,
commissions, employees, and agents of DSRSDharmless
and indemnify and defend thesame from any litigation,
claims, or fines resulting from the constructionand
completion ofthe project.
DSRSD Issuance of
BuildingPermits
152. Improvementplans shall includerecycled water
improvements as required by DSRSD. Services for
landscapeirrigation shall connect to recycled water mains.
Applicant must obtaina copy ofthe DSRSDRecycledWater
Use Guidelines and conform to the requirementstherein.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
153. Abovegroundbackflow preventiondevices/doubledetector
checkvalves shallbe installed onfire protectionsystems
connected to the DSRSDwatermain. The applicant shall
collaborate with the Fire Department and withDSRSD to size
and configure itsfire system. The applicant shall minimize the
number of backflowprevention devices /doubledetector
checkvalvesinstalled onits fire protectionsystem. The
applicant shall minimize the visualimpact ofthe backflow
preventiondevices/doubledetector check valvesthrough
strategicplacement and landscaping.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
154. Development plans will notbe approved until landscape
plansare submitted and approved.
DSRSD Issuance of
BuildingPermits
155. Grading for construction shall be done withrecycledwater. DSRSDDuring
Construction
156. Temporary portable irrigation meters in areaswithrecycled
water service shallbe allowed for cross-connectionand
coveragetesting for a maximum of 14 days.
DSRSD On-going
157. The project is locatedwithin the District Recycled Water Use
Zone, which calls for installation of recycledwater irrigation
systems to allow for thefutureuse of recycled water for
approvedlandscapeirrigationdemands. Recycled waterwill
be available as described in DSRSD Water System Master
Plan, March2016. Unless specificallyexempted by the
DistrictEngineer, compliance withOrdinance 301, as maybe
amendedor suspended, is required. The applicant must
submitlandscape irrigation plansto DSRSD. All irrigation
facilities shallbe incompliancewith District’s “Recycled
WaterUse Guidelines” and the Department of Health
Servicesrequirements for recycled water irrigation.
DSRSD Issuanceof
Building Permits
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 126
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
29
PASSEDAND ADOPTED BY the City Council of theCity of Dublin, on this 5th day of
December2017, bythe following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
CityClerk
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036 Parcel A-3 Stage 2PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\CC Attachments\3. City Council Resolution approving a Site
DevelopmentReview Permit and Tentative Map 8437 for Site A-3.docx
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 127
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
c
BA
R
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
8/28/20174:25:53
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
A
0
0
C
O
V
E
R
S
H
E
E
T
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
EN
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
R
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
SI
T
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
R
E
V
I
E
W
S
D
R
PL
A
N
N
E
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
Z
O
N
I
N
G
D
I
S
T
RI
C
T
S
T
A
G
E
2
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
AU
G
U
S
T
2
9
T
H
2
0
1
7
TE
L
CO
N
T
A
C
T
EM
A
I
L
AR
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
90
1
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
SA
N
F
R
A
N
C
IS
C
O
C
A
9
4
1
0
5
4
1
5
2
9
3
5
7
0
0
DA
V
I
D
I
S
R
A
E
L
di
s
r
a
e
l
@
b
a
r
a
r
c
h
c
o
m
BA
R
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
TE
L
CO
N
T
A
C
T
EM
A
I
L
CI
V
I
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
46
7
0
W
I
L
L
O
W
R
O
A
D
S
U
I
T
E
2
5
0
PL
E
A
S
A
N
T
O
N
C
A
9
4
5
8
8
9
2
5
3
9
6
7
7
5
1
ER
I
C
G
I
R
O
D
eg
i
r
o
d
@
b
k
f
c
o
m
BK
F
TE
L
CO
N
T
A
C
T
EM
A
I
L
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
23
2
5
3
R
D
S
T
R
E
E
T
SA
N
F
R
A
N
C
I
S
C
O
C
A
9
4
1
0
7
4
1
5
4
3
1
7
8
7
8
DA
V
ID
F
L
E
T
C
H
E
R
df
l
e
t
c
h
e
r
@
f
l
e
t
c
h
e
r
s
t
u
d
i
o
c
o
m
FL
E
T
C
H
E
R
S
T
U
D
I
O
AS
H
T
O
N
A
T
D
U
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
L
L
C
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 128
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/29/20178:44:04
AM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
PR
O
J
E
C
T
D
A
T
A
Ro
o
f
T
e
r
r
a
c
e
9
2
8
Po
d
i
u
m
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
2
4
9
2
0
Le
v
e
l
1
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
1
9
0
3
0
Si
t
e
A
r
e
a
10
2
6
7
0
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
R
e
s
R
e
n
t
a
b
l
e
G
S
F
R
e
s
T
o
t
a
l
G
S
F
75
To
t
a
l
21
0
0
3
3
2
5
0
1
5
8
3
4
7
27
8
4
1
7
00
0
12
6
6
5
7
40
5
0
7
40
1
6,
7
4
0
2
5
0
1
2
8
5
9
8
4
4
2
8
0
7
5
0
1
20
7
2
5
00
0
62
8
9
6
83
6
2
1
2
9,
6
9
8
0
2
8
3
8
3
0
0
18
2
8
1
00
0
63
7
6
1
82
0
4
2
3
46
1
5
3
0
4
6
4
1
8
7
8
1
0
0
1
2
58
5
0
7
00
0
0
58
5
0
7
4
48
3
6
1
0
1
0
2
5
2
58
6
1
3
00
0
0
58
6
1
3
5
49
0
8
5
0
1
0
6
9
6
59
7
8
1
00
0
0
59
7
8
1
6
28
3
5
2
0
9
2
8
6
5
5
4
35
8
3
4
00
0
0
35
8
3
4
7
21
6
4
4
0
5
0
3
2
26
6
7
6
00
0
0
26
6
7
6
Le
v
e
l
R
e
n
t
a
b
l
e
S
F
L
o
b
b
y
Fi
t
n
e
s
s
P
o
o
l
L
e
a
s
i
n
g
L
o
u
n
g
e
C
o
n
f
C
l
u
b
R
m
Co
r
e
G
r
o
s
s
R
e
n
t
a
b
l
e
C
o
r
e
G
r
o
s
s
G
r
o
s
s
G
S
F
To
t
a
l
R
e
s
R
e
s
A
m
e
n
i
t
y
R
e
s
R
e
s
R
e
t
a
i
l
R
e
t
a
i
l
R
e
t
a
i
l
G
a
r
a
g
e
T
O
T
A
L
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
A
R
E
A
T
A
B
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
wt
13
0
C
l
a
s
s
1
b
i
k
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
al
l
s
1
C
l
a
s
s
I
s
p
a
c
e
s
1
D
U
1
C
l
a
s
s
I
s
p
a
c
e
e
v
e
r
y
4
D
U
o
v
e
r
1
0
0
Re
q
u
i
r
e
d
T
i
t
l
e
2
4
1
3
0
11665
13
0
LE
V
E
L
A
R
E
A
T
O
T
A
L
CO
U
N
T
BI
C
Y
C
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
M
O
U
N
T
E
D
3
o
f
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
3
3
0
st
a
l
l
s
1
1
E
V
c
h
a
r
g
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
p
e
r
C
A
G
r
e
e
n
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
4
1
0
6
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
ct
u
r
e
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
E
V
c
h
a
r
g
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
EV
P
A
R
K
I
N
GTo
t
a
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
H
C
A
c
c
e
s
i
b
l
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
9
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
s
t
a
l
l
s
2%
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
2
8
0
st
a
l
l
s
6
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
s
t
a
l
l
s
5%
o
f
g
u
e
s
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
5
0
s
t
al
l
s
3
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
s
t
a
l
l
s
ii
i
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
ii
3
3
0
s
t
a
l
l
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
1
5
g
u
e
s
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
5
0
s
t
a
l
l
s
i:
1
5
s
p
a
c
e
s
p
e
r
D
U
1
5
x
2
2
0
3
3
0
TA
R
G
E
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
M
I
X
SP
A
C
E
S
P
E
R
1
0
0
0
s
q
f
t
o
f
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
0
8
3
SP
A
C
E
S
P
E
R
U
N
I
T
1
5
0
7
3
2
4
2
6
2
5
3
3
2
7
1
0
0
0
To
t
a
l
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
H
C
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
9
TO
T
A
L
24
8
0
2
0
7
1
1
9
33
1
Un
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
5%
3
Un
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
G
u
e
s
t
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
15
5
0
115
41
83
11
9
15
9
As
s
i
g
n
e
d
A
c
c
e
s
i
b
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
2%
6
2
9
3
9
1
2
4
0
0
17
2
As
s
i
g
n
e
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
2
8
0
8'
x
1
7
9
x
1
7
9
x
1
8
9
X
1
8
LE
V
E
L
C
O
M
P
A
C
T
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
E
V
A
D
A
T
O
T
A
L
CO
U
N
T
PE
R
C
E
N
T
T
O
T
A
L
H
C
S
T
A
L
L
S
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
44
5
5
T
w
o
B
e
d
r
o
o
m
s
o
r
L
a
r
g
e
r
1
0
0
4
1
8
3
6
3
5
9
8
6
1
0
0
0
TO
T
A
L
22
9
2
8
7
9
1
9
22
0
12
6
1
9
22
7
3
12
3
420
2
18
4
48
4
320
2
20
4
49
5
421
2
20
4
51
6
412
1
10
3
30
7
36
1
7
4
21
64
0
t
y
p
S
F
8
0
0
t
y
p
S
F
9
7
5
t
y
p
S
F
1
1
2
0
t
y
p
S
F
1
2
8
0
t
y
p
S
F
LE
V
E
L
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
x
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
x
2
B
E
D
3
x
2
B
E
D
T
O
T
A
L
CO
U
N
T
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
U
N
I
T
M
I
X
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
T
A
B
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
TY
P
E
I
I
I
A
O
V
E
R
T
Y
P
E
1
A
4
5
S
T
O
R
I
E
S
O
V
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
TY
P
E
V
A
O
V
E
R
T
Y
P
E
1
A
ST
O
R
Y
H
E
I
G
H
T
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
3
S
T
O
R
I
E
S
O
V
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
ST
O
R
Y
H
E
I
G
H
T
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
5
S
T
O
R
I
E
S
O
V
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
R-
2
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
A-
3
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
A
M
E
N
I
T
I
E
S
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
G
R
O
U
P
S
S
2
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
G
A
R
A
G
E
SP
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
F
U
L
L
Y
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
E
D
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
Y
S
T
E
M
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
T
Y
P
E
S
I
A
1
1
1
A
V
A
SE
T
B
A
C
K
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
20
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
MA
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
MA
X
I
M
U
M
H
E
I
G
H
T
5
S
T
O
R
I
E
S
O
V
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
DE
N
S
I
T
Y
A
B
O
V
E
2
5
1
D
U
A
C
SI
T
E
A
R
E
A
1
0
2
6
7
0
PR
O
J
E
C
T
U
S
E
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
A
N
PR
I
V
A
T
E
A
M
E
N
I
T
Y
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
LA
N
D
U
S
E
H
I
G
H
D
E
N
S
I
T
Y
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
SP
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
L
A
N
TR
A
N
S
I
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
A
T
E
D
A
S
P
L
A
N
N
SU
B
A
R
E
A
W
I
T
H
I
N
E
A
S
T
E
R
N
D
U
B
L
I
N
S
P
E
PL
A
N
ZO
N
I
N
G
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
DU
B
L
I
N
T
R
A
N
S
I
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
P
L
A
SP
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
L
A
N
A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T
S
S
T
A
G
E
1
P
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
R
E
Z
O
N
I
N
G
2
0
0
2
AS
S
E
S
S
O
R
S
P
A
R
C
E
L
N
U
M
B
E
R
9
8
6
0
0
3
4
0
0
9
0
0
PR
O
J
E
C
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
CO
R
N
E
R
O
F
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
A
N
D
C
A
M
LA
N
E
D
U
B
L
I
N
C
A
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
D
U
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
E
A
S
4
5
0
5
9
BI
C
Y
C
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
1
5
0
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
3
3
5
TO
T
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
2
2
0
LO
T
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
8
0
PR
O
J
E
C
T
D
E
N
S
I
T
Y
9
3
D
U
A
C
R
E
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 129
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:26:16
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
I
O
N
S
OC
C
U
P
A
N
T
L
O
A
D
S
A
B
O
V
E
W
H
I
C
H
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
T
W
O
M
E
A
N
S
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
A
S
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
0
6
2
1
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
LO
A
D
A-
3
4
9
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
S
R-
2
1
0
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
S
S-
2
2
9
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
S
SE
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
B
E
T
WE
E
N
S
T
A
I
R
W
A
Y
S
M
U
S
T
B
E
N
O
L
E
S
S
T
H
A
N
1
3
RD
T
H
E
L
E
N
G
T
H
O
F
M
A
X
I
M
U
M
D
I
A
G
O
N
A
L
O
F
T
H
E
AR
E
A
S
E
R
V
E
D
P
E
R
1
0
0
7
1
2
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
2
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
DI
N
G
I
S
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3O
R
N
F
P
A
1
3
R
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
CO
M
M
O
N
P
A
T
H
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
0
6
2
1
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
LE
N
G
T
H
A-
3
7
5
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
Y
S
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
0
6
2
1
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
A
R-
2
1
2
5
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
0
6
2
1
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
A
S-
2
1
0
0
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
0
6
2
1
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
A
EX
I
T
A
C
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
1
7
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
LE
N
G
T
H
A-
3
2
5
0
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
1
7
2
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
B
R-
2
2
5
0
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
1
7
2
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
B
S-
2
4
0
0
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
1
7
2
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
C
AC
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
M
E
A
N
S
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
AN
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
M
E
A
N
S
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
H
A
L
L
BE
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
I
N
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
T
H
E
S
A
M
E
N
U
MB
E
R
A
S
T
H
O
S
E
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
E
D
I
N
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
10
0
71
1
A
N
D
1
0
0
6
1
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
F
O
R
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
N
U
M
B
E
R
O
F
E
X
I
T
S
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
L
O
A
D
A
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
T
A
L
E
X
I
T
W
I
L
L
B
E
PR
O
V
I
D
E
D
I
N
L
I
E
U
O
F
E
L
E
V
A
T
O
R
T
O
M
E
E
T
TH
E
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
M
E
A
N
S
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
PE
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
0
9
2
1
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
1
H
O
R
IZ
O
N
T
A
L
E
X
I
T
S
A
R
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
A
T
T
H
E
F
I
R
E
W
A
L
L
S
S
E
E
P
L
A
N
S
A
N
D
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
2
FO
R
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
DE
A
D
E
N
D
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
S
PE
R
1
0
2
0
4
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
2
R
2
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
I
E
S
A
R
E
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
5
0
F
T
D
E
A
D
E
N
D
S
W
H
E
R
E
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
I
S
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
TH
R
O
U
G
H
O
U
T
W
I
T
H
A
N
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
I
C
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
Y
S
T
E
M
A
4
8
C
L
E
A
R
W
I
D
T
H
A
T
A
S
T
A
I
R
W
A
Y
I
S
N
O
T
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
P
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
0
9
3
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
2
AR
E
A
S
O
F
R
E
F
U
G
E
A
R
E
N
O
T
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
P
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
0
9
3
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
5
8
10
0
9
2
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
I
T
Y
O
F
E
X
I
T
S
C
H
E
C
KF
O
R
P
O
D
I
U
M
13
F
I
R
E
W
A
L
L
S
S
EC
T
I
O
N
7
0
6
14
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
BI
L
I
T
Y
PR
O
J
E
C
T
I
S
A
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
L
Y
F
U
ND
E
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
T
H
E
R
E
F
O
R
E
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
I
E
S
I
N
A
L
L
N
E
W
L
Y
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
V
E
R
E
D
M
U
L
T
I
F
A
M
I
L
Y
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
S
S
H
A
L
L
M
E
E
T
T
H
E
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
1
1
A
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
UN
I
T
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
S
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
S
I
N
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
S
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
M
P
L
Y
WI
T
H
O
P
T
I
O
N
2
P
E
R
C
B
C
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
1
3
4
A
2
2N
D
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
S
I
N
2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
S
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
O
P
T
I
O
N
2
P
E
R
C
B
C
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
1
3
4
A
2
MA
S
T
E
R
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
S
I
N
2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
S
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
I
T
E
M
S
7
1
2
O
F
C
B
C
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
1
3
4
A
2
O
P
T
I
O
N
2
C
O
M
M
O
N
U
S
E
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
S
U
C
H
A
S
L
O
B
B
I
E
S
S
H
A
R
E
D
A
M
E
N
I
T
Y
S
P
A
C
E
S
C
O
M
M
O
N
T
O
I
L
E
T
R
O
O
M
S
S
H
A
L
L
M
E
E
T
T
H
E
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
1
1
2
7
A
15
L
I
G
H
T
A
N
D
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
O
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
C
B
C
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
F
O
R
L
I
G
H
T
A
N
D
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
A
T
H
A
B
I
T
A
B
L
E
R
O
O
M
S
P
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
2
0
5
2
1
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
LI
G
H
T
I
N
A
N
Y
R
O
O
M
I
S
P
E
R
M
I
T
T
E
D
T
O
B
E
CO
N
S
I
D
E
R
E
D
A
S
A
P
O
R
T
I
O
N
O
F
A
N
A
D
J
O
I
N
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
W
H
E
R
E
O
N
E
H
A
L
F
O
F
T
H
E
A
R
E
A
O
F
TH
E
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
A
L
L
I
S
O
P
E
N
A
N
D
U
N
O
B
S
T
R
U
C
T
E
D
A
N
D
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
S
A
N
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
O
F
N
O
T
L
E
S
S
T
H
A
N
1
1
0
TH
O
F
T
H
E
F
L
O
O
R
A
R
E
A
O
F
TH
E
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
R
O
O
M
O
R
2
5
S
Q
F
T
W
H
I
C
H
E
V
E
R
I
S
G
R
E
A
T
E
R
16
P
L
U
M
B
I
N
G
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
C
O
U
N
T
S
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
P
L
U
M
B
I
N
G
C
O
D
E
2
0
1
6
T
A
B
L
E
A
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
L
O
A
D
F
A
C
T
O
R
A
P
P
L
I
E
S
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
2
9
0
2
1
N
O
T
E
3
W
H
E
N
D
E
S
I
G
N
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
L
O
A
DI
S
L
E
S
S
T
H
A
N
1
0
P
E
R
S
O
N
S
A
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
Y
U
S
A
B
L
E
B
Y
E
I
T
HE
R
S
E
X
MA
Y
B
E
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
B
Y
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
17
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
R
R
A
D
I
O
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
PE
R
2
0
1
6
C
A
F
I
R
E
C
O
D
E
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
5
1
0
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
O
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
R
A
D
I
O
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
F
O
R
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
R
S
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
O
A
L
L
O
W
F
O
R
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
A
N
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
R
S
R
A
D
I
O
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
Y
S
T
EM
U
P
O
N
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
CO
M
P
L
E
T
I
O
N
R
A
DI
O
T
E
S
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
C
O
N
D
U
C
T
E
D
T
O
D
E
T
E
R
M
I
N
E
I
F
A
N
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
R
S
R
A
D
I
O
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
H
A
L
L
BE
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
18
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
E
S
C
A
P
E
A
N
D
R
E
S
C
U
E
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
P
E
R
C
B
C
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
3
0
T
Y
P
E
V
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
I
N
G
R
O
U
P
R
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
S
L
E
E
P
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
S
B
E
L
O
W
T
H
E
F
O
U
R
T
H
S
T
O
R
Y
A
B
O
V
E
GR
A
D
E
P
L
A
N
E
S
E
E
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
L
E
G
E
N
D
F
O
R
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
Y
M
B
O
L
A
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
F
O
R
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
T
Y
P
E
1
I
I
I
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
M
E
R
G
E
NC
Y
E
S
C
A
P
E
A
N
D
R
E
S
C
U
E
WI
N
D
O
W
S
A
R
E
N
O
T
R
E
Q
U
I
R
ED
I
N
R
2
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
SL
E
E
P
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
S
P
E
R
1
0
3
0
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
1
S
E
E
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
S
F
O
R
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
I
Z
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
19
E
N
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
SE
C
T
I
O
N
3
2
0
2
3
3
S
T
A
T
E
S
E
N
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
O
R
M
O
R
E
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
C
O
M
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
3
FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
W
L
1
w
1
L
2
w
2
L
3
w
3
F
W=
1
1
8
x
3
0
1
1
8
W=
3
0
AM
O
U
N
T
O
F
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
If =
F
P
0
2
5
W
3
0
If =
1
1
8
3
7
3
0
2
5
3
0
3
0
If =
0
0
6
AL
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
SI
N
G
L
E
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
M
U
L
T
I
S
T
O
R
Y
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
Aa =
A
t
N
S
I
f)]
S
a
Aa =
2
4
0
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
Aa =
5
0
8
8
0
M
A
X
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
C
O
M
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
4
N
O
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
T
A
K
E
N
AL
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
SI
N
G
L
E
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
M
U
L
T
I
S
T
O
R
Y
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
Aa =
A
t
N
S
I
f)]
S
a
Aa =
2
4
0
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
2
Aa =
4
8
0
0
0
M
A
X
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
TY
P
E
V
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
L
E
V
E
L
S
3
5
O
N
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
C
O
M
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
5
N
O
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
T
A
K
E
N
AL
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
SI
N
G
L
E
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
M
U
L
T
I
S
T
O
R
Y
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
Aa =
A
t
N
S
I
f)]
S
a
Aa =
3
6
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
2
Aa =
7
2
0
0
0
M
A
X
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
8.
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
T
A
B
L
E
5
0
8
4
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
SE
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
R
E
Q
D
SE
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
S-
2
T
O
R
2
1
H
R
3
H
R
S-
2
T
O
A
3
N
O
N
E
R-
2
T
O
A
3
1
H
R
1
H
9.
F
I
R
E
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
T
A
B
L
E
6
0
1
A
N
D
6
0
2
FI
R
E
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
F
O
R
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
T
A
B
L
E
S
6
0
1
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
TY
P
E
I
A
TY
P
E
I
I
I
A
TY
P
E
V
A
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
F
R
A
M
E
3
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
EX
T
E
R
I
O
R
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
3
H
R
2
H
R
1
H
R
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
3
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
EX
T
E
R
I
O
R
N
O
N
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
F
O
R
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
F
O
R
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
S
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
N
O
N
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
0
H
R
0
H
R
0
H
R
FL
O
O
R
2
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
RO
O
F
1
5
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
N
O
T
E
AL
L
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
S
I
N
T
H
E
T
Y
P
E
I
I
I
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
T
O
B
E
2
H
R
R
A
T
E
D
AL
L
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
F
R
A
M
I
N
G
A
N
D
P
L
Y
W
O
O
D
S
H
E
A
T
H
I
N
G
I
N
T
H
E
T
Y
P
E
I
I
I
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
T
O
B
E
F
I
R
E
R
E
T
A
R
D
A
N
T
T
R
E
A
T
E
D
F
R
T
FI
R
E
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N T
S
F
O
R
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
LS
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
T
A
B
L
E
6
0
2
FI
R
E
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
F
T
T
Y
P
E
I
A
T
Y
P
E
I
I
I
A
T
Y
P
E
V
A
X
5
1
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
5'
T
O
1
0
1
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
10
T
O
3
0
1
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
30
X
N
O
N
E
N
O
N
E
N
O
N
E
FI
R
E
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
W
A
L
L
T
Y
P
E
S
WA
L
L
T
Y
P
E
T
Y
P
EI
A
T
Y
P
E
I
I
I
A
T
Y
P
E
V
A
SH
A
F
T
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
S
2
H
R
2
H
R
2
H
R
EX
I
T
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
S
2
H
R
2
H
R
2
H
R
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
W
A
L
L
S
A
N
D
1
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
WA
L
L
S
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
N
G
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
S
10
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
MA
X
I
M
U
M
A
R
E
A
O
F
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
F
I
R
E
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
7
0
5
8
FI
R
E
S
E
P
AR
A
T
I
O
N
D
I
S
T
F
T
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
A
R
E
A
X
3
U
P
S
N
O
T
P
E
R
M
I
T
T
E
D
3'
T
O
5
U
P
S
1
5
5'
T
O
1
0
U
P
S
2
5
10
T
O
1
5
U
P
S
4
5
15
T
O
2
0
U
P
S
7
5
20
T
O
2
5
U
P
S
N
O
L
I
M
I
T
11
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
G
A
R
A
G
E
S-
2
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
4
0
6
PA
R
K
I
N
G
G
A
R
A
G
E
I
S
C
L
A
S
S
I
F
I
E
D
A
S
E
N
C
L
O
S
ED
4
0
6
2
VE
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
T
O
B
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
I
N
A
C
C
O
R
D
AN
C
E
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
C
A
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
C
O
D
E
SE
E
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
VE
H
I
C
L
E
B
A
R
R
I
E
R
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
4
0
6
4
3
08.
29.
17ENT
RESUBMITTAL
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 130
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
UPDNUP
DN
DN
EX
I
T
S
T
A
I
R
3
EL
E
V
A
T
O
R
S
VE
H
I
C
L
E
E
N
EGRESS
SEPERATION
300' -
4" >
MAX.
DIAGONAL
LENGTH
423'-
0"
EX
I
T
A
T
G
R
A
D
E
E
X
I
T
A
T
G
R
A
D
E 3
3
4
3
3
3
1 5 1
1 6 6
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S-
2
EGRESS
SEPARATION
224' -
9" >
MAX.
DIAGONAL
LENGTH
423'-
0"
EX
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
1
0
7
0 3
9
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S-
2
3
3
4
3
3
1 6 218
1
7 9 '-1 0 " > 1 /3 O F T H E D I A G .
E G R E S S S E P A R A T I O N
1
1
1
2
1
3
O
F
T
H
E
D
I
A
G
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
9 9 '-7 " > 1 /3 O F T H E D I A G .
E G R E S S S E P A R A T I O N
103'-
0" >
1/
3
OF
THE
DIAG.
EGRESS
SEPARATION
1/3OFTHEDIAG.
EGRESSSEPERATION
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
1
0
7
0
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
1
2
9
7
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
1
2
6
6
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
1
2
8
0
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
1
0
0
6
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
1
4
2
0
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
1
3
8
0
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
R-
2
6
23
AM
E
N
I
T
Y
R-
2
39
38444385
6 5 5 4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
3
4
5
5
2
8
AM
E
N
I
T
Y
R-
2
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
4 55 57
3
6 4 4 4 5
5
4
5
5
6
4
6
3
0
61
11
0
10
4
49
33
H.
E
H.
E
H.
E
H.
E
H.
E
USEDFORFRONTAGEINCREASE
75' - 0"
US
E
D
F
O
R
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
14
9
6
12
5
5
1
0
3
0
1
3
O
F
T
H
E
D
I
A
G
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
1
0
7
0
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
1
2
9
7
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
1
2
8
0
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
R-
2
23
34
AM
E
N
I
T
Y
R-
2
54445
6 5 5 4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
3
4
5
5
3
5
5
5
7
6
3
54
36
14
3
3
3
23
90
OU
T
D
O
O
R
L
O
U
N
G
E
R-
2
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
1
4
7
0
7 9 '-1 0 " > 1 /3 O F T H E D I A G .
E G R E S S S E P A R A T I O N
1
1
1
2
1
3
O
F
T
H
E
D
I
A
G
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
9 9 '-7 " > 1 /3 O F T H E D I A G .
E G R E S S S E P A R A T I O N
H.
E
H.
E
H.
E
RO
O
F
A
C
C
E
S
S
2
H
R
R
A
T
E
D
ST
A
I
R
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
NO
T
E
NO
N
S
T
O
R
Y
NO
S
E
C
O
N
D
E
G
R
E
S
S
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
D
RO
O
F
A
T
LE
V
E
L
6
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:30:49
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
1
4
0
0
G
0
3
1
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L
E
V
E
L
1
1
4
0
0
G
0
3
2
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L
E
V
E
L
2
1
4
0
0
G
0
3
3
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L
E
V
E
L
S
3
5
1
4
0
0
G
0
3
4
Le
v
e
l
6
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 131
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
DN
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
1
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
1
2
RE
S
I
D
E
29
30
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
1
4
7
0
5
3
4
5
5
3
5
5
5
7
6
3
3
M AX . D IA G ON A L L EN G T H 2 3 4 ' - 6 "
H.
E
RO
O
F
A
C
C
E
S
S
2
H
R
R
A
T
E
ST
A
IR
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
NO
T
E
NO
N
S
T
O
R
Y
NO
S
E
C
O
N
D
E
G
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
D
RO
O
F
A
T
LE
V
E
L
7
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:31:10
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
1
4
0
0
G
0
4
1
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L
E
V
E
L
7
1
4
0
0
G
0
4
2
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
R
O
O
F
P
L
A
N
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 132
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DUBLIN,
CA
SITE
A-
3
3/
16/
2017
10:
18:
30
AM
C:\
Autodesk\
16036
UDR
Dublin-
CENTRAL_
alink.
rvt
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DUBLIN
STATION
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
TITLE SHEET
C0.0
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 133
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
NOTES:LEGEND:
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DUBLIN,
CA
SITE
A-
3
3/
16/
2017
10:
18:
30
AM
C:\
Autodesk\
16036
UDR
Dublin-
CENTRAL_
alink.
rvt
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DUBLIN
STATION
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PLAN
C1.0
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 134
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
UP
UP
6%12%
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCC
CCCCCCC
CC
CC
8%
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"0' - 0"
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"
6%
1' - 0"
0' - 0"
8%
CCC
1' - 7"0' - 8"
1' - 0"
0' - 9"
CCCCCCCCCC
CC
C
C
CC
1' - 10"
1'-6"
1'-6"
CAMPBELL LANE
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
CAMPBELL
LANE
GARAGE
FITNESS
ROOM
LEASING
OFFICE
LOBBY
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
TRASHTRASHFIRE
ROOM
WESTFRONTAGE: CAMPBELLLANE
1"=5'A NORTHFRONTAGE: PRIVATEDRIVE
1"=5'B EASTFRONTAGE: DEMARCUSBLVD
1"=5'C SOUTH FRONTAGE: CAMPBELL LANE
1"=5'D
SITE PLAN LEGEND:
SITE PLAN NOTES:
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DUBLIN,
CA
SITE
A-
3
3/
16/
2017
10:
18:
30
AM
C:\
Autodesk\
16036
UDR
Dublin-
CENTRAL_
alink.
rvt
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DUBLIN
STATION
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
CIVIL SITE PLAN
C2.0
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 135
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
UP
UP
6%12%
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCC
CCCCCCC
CC
CC
8%
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"0' - 0"
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"
6%
1' - 0"
0' - 0"
8%
CCC
1' - 7"0' - 8"
1' - 0"
0' - 9"
CCCCCCCCCC
CC
C
C
CC
1' - 10"
1'-6"
1'-6"
CAMPBELL LANE
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
CAMPBELL
LANE
LEGEND:GRADING NOTES:
DRIVEWAY DETAIL
1"=10'
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DUBLIN,
CA
SITE
A-
3
3/
16/
2017
10:
18:
30
AM
C:\
Autodesk\
16036
UDR
Dublin-
CENTRAL_
alink.
rvt
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DUBLIN
STATION
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
GRADING PLAN
C3.0
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 136
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
UP
UP
6%12%
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCC
CCCCCCC
CC
CC
8%
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"0' - 0"
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"
6%
1' - 0"
0' - 0"
8%
CCC
1' - 7"0' - 8"
1' - 0"
0' - 9"
CCCCCCCCCC
CC
C
C
CC
1' - 10"
1'-6"
1'-6"
CAMPBELL LANE
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARDCAMPBELL
LANE
LEGEND:
NOTES:
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DUBLIN,
CA
SITE
A-
3
3/
16/
2017
10:
18:
30
AM
C:\
Autodesk\
16036
UDR
Dublin-
CENTRAL_
alink.
rvt
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DUBLIN
STATION
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
UTILITY PLAN
C4.0
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 137
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
S L O P E
S L O P E
S L O P E
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
S L O P E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
S L O P E
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
S L O P E
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE SLOPE
S L O P E
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
CAMPBELL LANE
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
CAMPBELL
LANE
NOTES:LEGEND:
STORMWATER
CONTROL PLAN
C5.0
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DUBLIN,
CA
SITE
A-
3
3/
16/
2017
10:
18:
30
AM
C:\
Autodesk\
16036
UDR
Dublin-
CENTRAL_
alink.
rvt
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DUBLIN
STATION
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 138
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
1 FLOW-THRU PLANTER
NTS
2 STORMWATER FILTER
NTS
STORMWATER
CONTROL DETAILS
C5.1
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DUBLIN,
CA
SITE
A-
3
3/
16/
2017
10:
18:
30
AM
C:\
Autodesk\
16036
UDR
Dublin-
CENTRAL_
alink.
rvt
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DUBLIN
STATION
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 139
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
UP
UP
6%12%
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCC
CCCCCCC
CC
CC
8%
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"0' - 0"
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"
6%
1' - 0"
0' - 0"
8%
CCC
1' - 7"0' - 8"
1' - 0"
0' - 9"
CCCCCCCCCC
CC
C
C
CC
1' - 10"
1'-6"
1'-6"
CAMPBELL LANE
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
CAMPBELL
LANE
xx
x x x x x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
xx
x
xxxx
xx
xxx
x
xxx
x
xxxxxxxx
xxx
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x x x
x
x
xxxxxxx x xx
GARAGE
FITNESS
ROOM
LEASING
OFFICE
LOBBY
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
TRASHTRASHFIRE
ROOM
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DUBLIN,
CA
SITE
A-
3
3/
16/
2017
10:
18:
30
AM
C:\
Autodesk\
16036
UDR
Dublin-
CENTRAL_
alink.
rvt
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DUBLIN
STATION
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN
C6.0
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 140
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DUBLIN,
CA
SITE
A-
3
3/
16/
2017
10:
18:
30
AM
C:\
Autodesk\
16036
UDR
Dublin-
CENTRAL_
alink.
rvt
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DUBLIN
STATION
DEMARCUS
BOULEVARD
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
EROSION CONTROL
NOTES AND DETAILS
C6.1
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 141
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
AS SHOWN
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
L1.00
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
LANDSCAPESITE PLAN
PERCENT LANDSCAPING LEGEND
GROUNDLEVEL:
69.9% HARDSCAPE, 18,850 SF
25.5% PLANTING AREA, 6,881 SF
3.9% BIORETENTIONPLANTER, 1,042SF
0.7% ARTIFICAL TURF, 185 SF
PODIUM:
52.2% HARDSCAPE, 12,778 SF
25.8% RAISEDPLANTER, 6,308SF
11.5% BIORETENTIONPLANTER, 2,809 SF
5.5% ARTIFICIAL TURF, 1,355 SF
5.0% POOL, 1,210 SF
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
EAST
PODIUM
COURTYARD
WEST
PODIUM
COURTYARD
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
W
E
S
T
CAMPBELLLANESOUTH
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
CAMELLIA PLACE
scale: 1” = 20’N
PL
PL
PLPL
GENERALNOTES:
1. ALL IRRIGATION AT SHRUBANDGROUNDCOVER
PLANTINGS TO BE DRIP IRRIGATION. INDIVIDUAL
BUBBLERS WILLBE PROVIDED AT TREEPLANTINGS.
2. ALL PLANTINGAREASTOINCLUDE 3” LAYER OF 3/8” BLACK
MINI-CHIPMULCH
3. SOIL ANALYSISTO BE SUBMITTEDWITHFINALLANDSCAPE
PLAN WITHBUILDINGPERMIT/IMPROVEMENTPLANS
4. MAINTENANCERESPONSIBILITY FALLS TO OWNER
FOR SITE AND SIDEWALKDIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE
BUILDING. THE CITY IS RESPONSIBLE FORTHE STREET
ANDANY MEDIANISLANDS
L3.00L5.00
L2.00
L4.00
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
LIMITOFWORK
PROPERTYLINE
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 142
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
STREETSCAPE PLAN
AS SHOWN
L2.00
1111
FA
C
E
O
F
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
15
1
3
4
11’-0”
10’-0”
7’-1”1
4
6
6’
0
7’
9
2’
8
14
2
8’
9
1
1
1
0
1
0
6
1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Sedumrubrotinctum
Jelly-beanSedum
Water Usage: L
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
CAMELLIA PLACE
scale: 1” = 10’
scale: 1/4” = 1’
3’-4”5’-0”8’-0”
PARALLELPARKING
PLANTED
BULBOUTBEYOND)
6” CURB
30” MAX.
PLANTINGHT.
SIDEWALKCONCRETE
PLANTER
3’-4”*PLANTER
DEPTH
VARIES
A
A’
PL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
10’-4” TYP3’-7”5’-8”9’-6”6’-0”15’-6”8’-11”16’-9”6’-0”
2’-0”
TYP.37’-2”
26’-0”22’-6”22’-6”
23’-8” TYP.5’-8”4’-0”50’-9”
20’-0” TYP
8’-0” TYP8’-0” TYP
5’-0” TYP
3’-4” TYP
N
STREETSCAPESECTION AA’
MATERIALS
PLANT PALETTE
Limoniumcalifornicum
Elymusglaucus Echeveria
WesternMarshRosemary
BI
O
R
E
T
E
N
T
I
O
N
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
BlueWildRye
RaisedConcretePlanter/
BioretentionPlanter
IntegralColorConcrete,
Color: SouthernBlush
Echeveria
SITE FURNISHINGS
4
5559
1012
12
12
9
9
181818
11
11
A’
A
FacetedSteelBench ModularConcreteUnitPavers,
Color: Foundry
FacetedSteelRetaining/
Planter Wall
8 29
29
29
PL PL
1 Gal, 18” O.C.
Water Usage: L
5 Gal, 12” O.C.
Water Usage: L
5 Gal, 1’-0” O.C.
Water Usage: L
Amphitheatre Stair Seating
333
42
2
23
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTYLINE
Water Usage: L
1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Festucarubra
CreepingRedFescue
Water Usage: L
5 Gal, 4’ O.C.
Lavanduladentatavar. candicans
GrayLeavedFrenchLavender
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
STREETTREES
Arbutus unedo
Strawberry Tree
24” Box
Water Usage: L
19191919
KEY
SIDEWALK,
INTEGRALCOLORCONC
COLOR: SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
SIDEWALK,
MODULARCONC
UNIT PAVERS
MANUF: BELGARD
COLOR: FOUNDRY
FINISH: SMOOTH
SIZE: 6X12
SIDEWALK,
CITY STANDARD CONC
PARALLELPARKING
TOWNHOMESTOOP
PUBLICFLEX SPACE
AMPHITHEATRE STAIR
SEATING, INTEGRALCOLOR
CONCRETE
COLOR: SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
FACETED STEEL BENCH,
HEIGHT: 18”
FLOWTHROUGHPLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PLANTINGAREA
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
CITY STD. CROSSWALK
E) RAISEDCROSSWALK
E) BULB-OUT
E) UTILITY VAULT
UTILITIES (PROPOSED),
SCREENED W/PLANTING
E) STREETSIGN
E) LIGHT POLE
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
FACETED STEELPLANTER
HEIGHT: 18”
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
22
12
E) PLANTERISLAND
21
GARAGEENTRY
ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIANRAMP
DEPRESSEDCURB
WITHBOLLARDS
13
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MODULAR STEEL
RETAININGWALL,
HEIGHT VARIES:
0”-18”
E) FIREHYDRANT
TRAFFICBOLLARD
CITY STD. CURB RAMP
ARTIFICIAL TURF
STOOPPLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MEDSANDBLAST
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
10 STREET TREE:
Platanusacerifolia
Bloodgood’
E) STREETTREE:
Platanusacerifolia
Bloodgood’, TBC
STREET TREE:
Pyruscalleryana
Aristocrat’
STREETTREE:
Arbutusunedo
E) STREET TREE:
Pyruscalleryana
Aristocrat’
E) STREET TREE:
Arbutusunedo
PRIVATE REALM TREE:
Lagerstroemia indica
E) STREET TREE:
Laurusnobilis ‘Saratoga’
FUTURESTREET TREE
N.I.C.)
INTEGRALCOLOR
CONCRETE SEATWALL
COLOR:
SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MEDSANDBLAST
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 143
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
AS SHOWN
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
DEMARCUS BLVD
STREETSCAPE PLAN
L3.00scale:
1” = 10’N
scale: 1/4” = 1’
20’-0”
2’-6”
PLANTING
6’
11’-0”
10’-0”, VARIES10’-0”, VARIES 5’-0”8’-0”
PARALLEL
PARKING
6” CURB
11’ WALK WITH
5’X5’ SQTREEWELL
PLANTINGPRIVATEFITNESSAREA
STORMDRAINEASEMENT
1’-6”, MAX
PL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
STREETSCAPESECTIONBB’
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
20 20
25
16
16
20’-0”
23’-6” O.C.25’-0” O.C., TYP 25’-0” O.C., TYP
FA
C
E
O
F
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
4 4
4
SITE FURNISHINGS
5’-0”
B
22’-6” O.C.22’-6” O.C.22’-6” O.C.24’-0” O.C.12’-6” O.C., TYP 12’-6” O.C., TYP12’-6” O.C., TYP 12’-6” O.C., TYP
5’-0”
TW +0”
TW +18”
TW +18”
TW +18”
TW +6”
TW +0”
TW +6”
TW +6”
TW +6”TW +0”
TW +0”
TW +0”TW +0”
MATCHLINE, SEE L4.00
TW +18”
TW +0”
7’-4”
13’-0”
28’-0”
7’-6”9’-2”
4’-6”
6’-0”
5’-8”
1’-8”
6’-3”
15’-10”20’-0”12’-8”
2’-0”15’-5”
8’-0”
6’-0”
2’-6”
B
B’
B’
1 111111111
1
2
2
2
2
2222222222
2
3
6
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
1111
11
1111
13
13 13
13 13
13
13
13
13
13
11 11 11
23
11 11 1119 19
19
19 11 11 11 11
DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
SH
A
R
E
D
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
PL
PL
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
Water Usage: M
Water Usage: L Water Usage: L
Water Usage: L
1 Gal, 36” O.C.5 Gal, 48” O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Lomandralongifolia ‘Tanika’Salvialeucantha ‘Midnight’Sempervivum ‘Purple Beauty’
Tanika Lomandra PurpleMexican Sage Hen and Chicks
PLANT PALETTE
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
5 Gal, 24” O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Anigozanthos ‘Bush Tango’Sedumrubrotinctum
OrangeKangarooPaw Jelly-beanSedum
RaisedConcretePlanter/
Bioretention Planter
FacetedSteelBench FacetedSteelRetaining/
Planter Wall
Amphitheatre Stair Seating
20’-0”
STORM
DRAIN
EASEMENT
Water Usage: L
30’-0”
VISIBILITYZONE, S.C.D.
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTYLINE
STREETTREES
30” MAX.
PLANTING HT.
24” Box
Water Usage: M
Pyruscalleryana ‘Aristocrat’
AristocratPear
Echeveria
Echeveria
5 Gal, 1’-0” O.C.
Water Usage: L
MATCHLINE, SEE L3.00
MATERIALS
IntegralColorConcrete,
Color: SouthernBlush
ModularConcreteUnitPavers,
Color: Foundry
KEY
SIDEWALK,
INTEGRALCOLORCONC
COLOR: SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
SIDEWALK,
MODULARCONC
UNIT PAVERS
MANUF: BELGARD
COLOR: FOUNDRY
FINISH: SMOOTH
SIZE: 6X12
SIDEWALK,
CITY STANDARD CONC
PARALLELPARKING
TOWNHOMESTOOP
PUBLICFLEX SPACE
AMPHITHEATRE STAIR
SEATING, INTEGRALCOLOR
CONCRETE
COLOR: SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
FACETED STEEL BENCH,
HEIGHT: 18”
FLOWTHROUGHPLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PLANTINGAREA
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
CITY STD. CROSSWALK
E) RAISEDCROSSWALK
E) BULB-OUT
E) UTILITY VAULT
UTILITIES (PROPOSED),
SCREENED W/PLANTING
E) STREETSIGN
E) LIGHT POLE
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
FACETED STEELPLANTER
HEIGHT: 18”
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
22
12
E) PLANTERISLAND
21
GARAGEENTRY
ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIANRAMP
DEPRESSEDCURB
WITHBOLLARDS
13
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MODULAR STEEL
RETAININGWALL,
HEIGHT VARIES:
0”-18”
E) FIREHYDRANT
TRAFFICBOLLARD
CITY STD. CURB RAMP
ARTIFICIAL TURF
STOOPPLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MEDSANDBLAST
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
10 STREET TREE:
Platanusacerifolia
Bloodgood’
E) STREETTREE:
Platanusacerifolia
Bloodgood’, TBC
STREET TREE:
Pyruscalleryana
Aristocrat’
STREETTREE:
Arbutusunedo
E) STREET TREE:
Pyruscalleryana
Aristocrat’
E) STREET TREE:
Arbutusunedo
PRIVATE REALM TREE:
Lagerstroemia indica
E) STREET TREE:
Laurusnobilis ‘Saratoga’
FUTURESTREET TREE
N.I.C.)
INTEGRALCOLOR
CONCRETE SEATWALL
COLOR:
SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MEDSANDBLAST
LANDSCAPESITEPLAN
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 144
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
CAMPBELL LANE SOUTH
STREETSCAPE PLAN
AS SHOWN
L4.00scale:
1” = 20’N
PL
7
7
4 4 24
19
24
20
20
18
12
CAMPBELL LANESOUTH
C
C’
C’
C
1
1
3
6
11
2121
14
11
3
11
11
11
5’-0” TYP
6’-0” TYP4’-0”
6’-4”8’-0”
20’-0”
7’-0”TYP11’-5”7’-0”
6’-6”6’-11”
11’-0”7’-7”
10’-8”
6’-0”
5’-11”
1’-0” TYP1’-0” TYP
2’-6” TYP
LANDSCAPESITEPLAN
PL
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
Water Usage: M Water Usage: LWaterUsage: L
1 Gal, 6’ O.C.5 Gal, 4’ O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Passiflora incarnata Lavanduladentata var. candicansFestuca glauca
Purple Passionflower GrayLeavedFrenchLavenderDouglasIris
5 Gal, 24” O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Anigozanthos ‘Bush Tango’Sedumrubrotinctum
OrangeKangarooPaw Jelly-beanSedum
Water Usage: L Water Usage: L
RaisedConcretePlanter/
BioretentionPlanter
FacetedSteelBench FacetedSteelRetaining/
Planter Wall
AmphitheatreStairSeating
PLANTERISLAND
PARALLELPARKING
BEYOND)
6” CURB
SIDEWALKAT-GRADE
PLANTING
2’-6”6’-0”4’-0”
8’-0”
1’6”6”
scale: 1/4” = 1’
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
STREETSCAPESECTIONCC’PLANT PALETTE
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
FA
C
E
O
F
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
SITE FURNISHINGS
48’-6”
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTYLINE
STREETTREES
30” MAX.
PLANTING HT.
26
Platanusacerifolia ‘Bloodgood’
London Plane Tree
24” Box
Water Usage: M
Echeveria
Echeveria
5 Gal, 1’-0” O.C.
Water Usage: L
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
E
E
L
4
0
0
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
S
E
E
L
3
0
0
MATERIALS
IntegralColorConcrete,
Color: SouthernBlush
ModularConcreteUnitPavers,
Color: Foundry
KEY
SIDEWALK,
INTEGRALCOLORCONC
COLOR: SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
SIDEWALK,
MODULARCONC
UNIT PAVERS
MANUF: BELGARD
COLOR: FOUNDRY
FINISH: SMOOTH
SIZE: 6X12
SIDEWALK,
CITY STANDARD CONC
PARALLELPARKING
TOWNHOMESTOOP
PUBLICFLEX SPACE
AMPHITHEATRE STAIR
SEATING, INTEGRALCOLOR
CONCRETE
COLOR: SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
FACETED STEEL BENCH,
HEIGHT: 18”
FLOWTHROUGHPLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PLANTINGAREA
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
CITY STD. CROSSWALK
E) RAISEDCROSSWALK
E) BULB-OUT
E) UTILITY VAULT
UTILITIES (PROPOSED),
SCREENED W/PLANTING
E) STREETSIGN
E) LIGHT POLE
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
FACETED STEELPLANTER
HEIGHT: 18”
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
22
12
E) PLANTERISLAND
21
GARAGEENTRY
ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIANRAMP
DEPRESSEDCURB
WITHBOLLARDS
13
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MODULAR STEEL
RETAININGWALL,
HEIGHT VARIES:
0”-18”
E) FIREHYDRANT
TRAFFICBOLLARD
CITY STD. CURB RAMP
ARTIFICIAL TURF
STOOPPLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MEDSANDBLAST
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
10 STREET TREE:
Platanusacerifolia
Bloodgood’
E) STREETTREE:
Platanusacerifolia
Bloodgood’, TBC
STREET TREE:
Pyruscalleryana
Aristocrat’
STREETTREE:
Arbutusunedo
E) STREET TREE:
Pyruscalleryana
Aristocrat’
E) STREET TREE:
Arbutusunedo
PRIVATE REALM TREE:
Lagerstroemia indica
E) STREET TREE:
Laurusnobilis ‘Saratoga’
FUTURESTREET TREE
N.I.C.)
INTEGRALCOLOR
CONCRETE SEATWALL
COLOR:
SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MEDSANDBLAST
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 145
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
CAMPBELL LANE WEST
STREETSCAPE PLAN
AS SHOWN
L5.00
BI
O
R
E
T
E
N
T
I
O
N
scale: 1” = 20’N
PLANT PALETTE
BI
O
R
E
T
E
N
T
I
O
N
LANDSCAPESITEPLAN
4 4
4
8’-0”
20’-0”
23’-7”
4’-0”
9’-8”
22’-0”11’-6”14’-10”TYP
14’-5”
2’-0”
6’-0”
6’-0”
2’-0”
6’-0”
2’-0”
4’-11
4’-0”6’-10”2’-0”
9’-0”
5’-10”
5’-0”
TYP
TYP
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
D’
D
3
3
19
19
19
19
19
11
2828
29 29
1111
11
11
11
9
9
5
9
3
3
3
21
18
1818
23
27
20
24 24
11 11
3
5’-0” TYP
6’-0” TYP
1’-0” TYP
2’-6” TYP
2’-1”
13
10
9’-
7
5’-
0
21
21
21
CAMPBELL LANEWEST
PL
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
S
O
U
T
H
SH
A
R
E
D
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
5 Gal, 24” O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Anigozanthos ‘Bush Tango’Sedumrubrotinctum
OrangeKangarooPaw Jelly-beanSedum
Water Usage: LWaterUsage: L
Limoniumcalifornicum
WesternMarshRosemary
1 Gal, 18” O.C.
Water Usage: L Water Usage: L
5 Gal, 4’ O.C.
Lavanduladentatavar. candicans
GrayLeavedFrenchLavender
Water Usage: L
1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Festucarubra
CreepingRedFescue
scale: 1/4” = 1’
STREETSCAPESECTIONDD’
RaisedConcretePlanter/
BioretentionPlanter
SITE FURNISHINGS
FacetedSteelBench FacetedSteelRetaining/
Planter Wall
ConcreteAmphitheatre Stair
Seating
PLANTERISLAND
PARALLEL PARKING
BEYOND)
6” CURB
SIDEWALKAT-GRADE
PLANTING
FA
C
E
O
F
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
D
2’-6”6’-0”4’-0”
8’-0”
1’6”6”
D’
PL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
26 26
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTYLINE
STREETTREES
30” MAX.
PLANTINGHT.
Platanusacerifolia ‘Bloodgood’
London Plane Tree
24” Box
Water Usage: M
Echeveria
Echeveria
5 Gal, 1’-0” O.C.
Water Usage: L
22
TYP
MATERIALS
IntegralColorConcrete,
Color: SouthernBlush
ModularConcreteUnitPavers,
Color: Foundry
KEY
SIDEWALK,
INTEGRALCOLORCONC
COLOR: SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
SIDEWALK,
MODULARCONC
UNIT PAVERS
MANUF: BELGARD
COLOR: FOUNDRY
FINISH: SMOOTH
SIZE: 6X12
SIDEWALK,
CITY STANDARD CONC
PARALLELPARKING
TOWNHOMESTOOP
PUBLICFLEX SPACE
AMPHITHEATRE STAIR
SEATING, INTEGRALCOLOR
CONCRETE
COLOR: SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
FACETED STEEL BENCH,
HEIGHT: 18”
FLOWTHROUGHPLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PLANTINGAREA
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
CITY STD. CROSSWALK
E) RAISEDCROSSWALK
E) BULB-OUT
E) UTILITY VAULT
UTILITIES (PROPOSED),
SCREENED W/PLANTING
E) STREETSIGN
E) LIGHT POLE
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
FACETED STEELPLANTER
HEIGHT: 18”
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
22
12
E) PLANTERISLAND
21
GARAGEENTRY
ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIANRAMP
DEPRESSEDCURB
WITHBOLLARDS
13
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MODULAR STEEL
RETAININGWALL,
HEIGHT VARIES:
0”-18”
E) FIREHYDRANT
TRAFFICBOLLARD
CITY STD. CURB RAMP
ARTIFICIAL TURF
STOOPPLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MEDSANDBLAST
3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
10 STREET TREE:
Platanusacerifolia
Bloodgood’
E) STREETTREE:
Platanusacerifolia
Bloodgood’, TBC
STREET TREE:
Pyruscalleryana
Aristocrat’
STREETTREE:
Arbutusunedo
E) STREET TREE:
Pyruscalleryana
Aristocrat’
E) STREET TREE:
Arbutusunedo
PRIVATE REALM TREE:
Lagerstroemia indica
E) STREET TREE:
Laurusnobilis ‘Saratoga’
FUTURESTREET TREE
N.I.C.)
INTEGRALCOLOR
CONCRETE SEATWALL
COLOR:
SOUTHERNBLUSH
FINISH: MEDSANDBLAST
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 146
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
AS SHOWN
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING
PLAN
L6.00
StakeMountedLED PathLightPool & SpaLightingPlayLightingTreeUplight RecessedPlanter Wall LightStringLights
KEY
TREE UPLIGHT
PLAY LIGHTING
POOL & SPA LIGHTING
CITY STANDARD STREETLIGHT (E)
STAKE MOUNTED LED PATH LIGHT
RECESSEDPLANTER WALL LIGHT
DECORATIVE STRINGLIGHTS (STRUNG
ALONG TOP OF STEELTRELLIS & POOL
CABANAS)
NOTE: LIGHT LOCATIONS ARE CONCEPTUAL
AND SUBJECTTOCHANGEPENDING A
PHOTOMETRICSTUDY. WILLBE SUBMITTED IN
BUILDING/SITEWORKPERMIT PLAN SUBMITTAL
scale: 1” = 20’N
CAMELLIA PLACE
PL
PL
PLPL
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
W
E
S
T
CAMPBELLLANESOUTH
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
LEGEND
LIMITOFWORK
PROPERTYLINE
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 147
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
CAMPBELLLN
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:26:23
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
1
N
O
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
2
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
3
S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
4
S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
LA
N
E
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
LA
N
E
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
1
5
0
0
A
0
2
1
SI
T
E
P
L
A
N
E
X
2 3
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 148
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:26:27
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
DEMARCUSBLVD
DU
B
L
I
N
B
L
V
D
LCA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELLLN
CA
M
E
L
I
A
P
L
A
C
E
4
S
T
O
R
Y
M
U
L
T
I
FA
M
I
L
Y
DU
B
L
I
N
T
R
A
N
S
I
T
CE
N
T
E
R
S
I
T
E
A
1
3
S
T
O
R
Y
M
U
L
T
I
FA
M
I
L
Y
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
DEMARCUSBLVD
SH
A
R
E
D
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 149
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
UP
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
FI
R
E
RO
O
M
TR
A
S
H
GA
R
A
G
E
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
RO
O
M
BO
I
L
E
R
RO
O
M
BI
K
E
ST
O
R
A
G
E
ID
F
40
0
0
1
2
36
4
8
50'
0"
222' - 101/2"
PA
R
C
E
L
A
PM
7
3
9
5
25
4
P
M
2
8
PA
R
C
E
L
2
PM
8
2
7
5
28
0
P
M
7
1
PA
R
C
E
L
1
PM
8
2
7
5
28
0
P
M
7
1
PA
R
C
E
L
3
PM
8
2
7
5
28
0
P
M
7
1
IR O N H O RSE
REGIO
N AL TR AIL
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
CAMPBELLLANE
VE
H
I
C
U
L
A
R
E
N
T
R
Y
24
0
18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"22' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"
33
5
6
5
LO
B
B
Y
SH
A
R
E
D
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
5'
1
1
1
2
2'
7
5'
6
15' - 0"
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
3
3
5
0
33
5
9
33
5
8
33
5
7
5
33
5
6
33
5
4
33
5
3
46
17
0
24
0
GA
S
ME
T
E
R
CL
O
S
E
T
1
B
E
D
J
R
PA
C
K
A
G
E
S
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
RO
O
M
FI
R
E
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
O
A
D
24' - 21/2"16' - 2"
MEDIAN26' - 0"14' - 3"
FI
R
E
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
O
A
D
ST
A
I
R
ST
A
I
R
0
4
33
5
5
EL
E
V
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:26:47
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 150
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:26:51
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
AE
R
I
A
L
S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 151
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:26:56
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 152
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:27:01
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 153
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:27:10
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
NO
R
T
H
E
A
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
C
A
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 154
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
UP
6%
12
1
A
2
0
22' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"17' - 0"2' - 6"18' - 0"24' - 2"17' - 0"
18
0
2
4
0
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
FI
R
E
RO
O
M
TR
A
S
H
GA
R
A
G
E
24
0
BO
I
L
E
R
RO
O
M
BI
K
E
ST
O
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
E
N
T
R
Y
8' - 5"
8'
6
CL
TYP
2' - 0"
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
CC
CL
TYP
3' - 0"
R
2
2' -
0
CL
TYP
3' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 0"
CL
TYP
3' - 10"
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
3'
0
3'
0
1'
6
3'
0
1'
6
ID
F
6%
1'
0
1'
6
5'
0
9'
0
12
7
7
S
F
LO
B
B
Y
9' - 0"9' - 0"
4' - 4"
5'
0
9'
0
9'
03'
1
1
2
9'
0
5'
0
4'
0
9'
0
9'
0
4'
0
5'
0
9
0
9'
0
9'
0
9'
0
5'
0
4'
0
9'
0
9'
0
4'
0
5'
0
9'
0
SH
E
A
R
W
A
L
L
2'
6
37
1
7
1
2
28' - 2"170' - 4"34' - 2"
GA
R
A
G
E
F
E
N
C
E
N
O
TH
R
O
U
G
H
A
C
C
E
S
S
SE
C
U
R
I
T
Y
G
A
T
E
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
1' - 0"
TYP
2' - 10"
PA
C
K
A
G
E
S
EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
A
R
E
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
U
N
D
E
R
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
3
2
O
F
TH
E
2
0
1
6
C
B
C
20
1
6
C
B
C
3
2
0
2
3
3
E
N
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
O
R
M
O
R
E
F
E
E
T
AB
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
F
E
E
T
4
5
7
2
M
M
O
R
MO
R
E
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
N
D
R
O
O
F
A
B
O
V
E
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
CC
C
1'
7
1'
0
0'
9
C
CC
VA
N
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
CC
C
C
C
C
C
GU
E
S
T
CCCCCC
FH
9'
0
9
0
9
0
1'
1
0
8'
1
73
7
1
2
2
0
4
1
2
1
0
0
3
2' - 41/2"232' - 8"23' - 21/2"
2'
7
4
1
0
27
5
5
1
2
1'
61'
6
1
B
E
D
J
R
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
RO
O
M
GA
S
ME
T
E
R
CL
O
S
E
T
50
G
U
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E
S
96
5
1
2
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
ST
A
I
R
0
4
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:27:32
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 155
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
DN
UP
1
A
2
0
12
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
ST
O
TR
A
S
H
ST
O
R
A
G
E
2' - 41/2"
2'
7
R
2
2' -
0
6%
4'
4
1
2
9'
0
CCCCCC C
C
C
CCCC
C
C CC CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
8'
1
37
1
7
1
2
2' - 41/2"232' - 8"23' - 21/2"
9'
0
5
4
1
2
9'
0
9'
0
9'
0
9'
0
4'
4
1
2
9'
0
9'
0
5'
4
1
2
9'
0
5
0
4'
0
9'
0
9'
0 5'
0
4'
0
9'
0
9'
0
4'
0
5'
0
9
0
5'
0
9'
0
9'
0
4'
0
18
0
2
4
0
18' - 0"24' - 2"17' - 0"22' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"17' - 0"
9'
0
9'
0
9' - 0"
9' - 0"
4' - 4"5'
0
9'
0
CL
TYP
2' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 0"CL
TYP.
3' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 10"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
1' - 0"
TYP
2' - 10"
13
0
12
5
13
0
13
0
34
7
0
13
0
73
7
2
0
4
1
2
1
0
0
3
2'
7
4
1
0
27
5
5
1
2
28' - 2"
96
6
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
ST
A
I
R
0
4
EL
E
V
OV
E
R
S
I
Z
E
D
PA
C
K
A
G
E
S
LO
B
B
Y
ST
A
I
R
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:27:42
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 156
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
DN
1
A
2
0
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1+
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
TR
A
S
H
AM
E
N
I
T
Y
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
5'
6
9
6
5
1
2
7
3
7
1
2
2
0
4
1
2
1
4
3
0
37
1
7
1
2
3 8 ' - 2 1 /2 "
1 1 4 ' - 6 1 /2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
6
6
5
1
2
2
1
0
1
2
1 8 ' - 1 1 /2 "
17
1
1
1
9
7
1
2
2
6
1
1
1
2
0
1
20' - 51/2"158' - 6"
232' - 6"
6
9
4
13' - 101/2"75' - 1"12' - 101/2"
14
7
1
2
14
3
PO
D
I
U
M
C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
PO
D
I
U
M
C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D
S
E
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
6
9
6
9
1
1
2
BRIDGE
9'
4
C
L
4
0
0
35
9
0
25
0
35
9
0
35
9
0
35
9
0
25
0
25
0
8
9
1
2
3 ' - 2 1 /2 "
3' - 0"
2'
5
37
7
3
1
2
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
1
B
E
D
J
R
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
ST
A
I
R
0
4
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:28:00
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 157
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
1
A
2
0
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
3
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
TR
A
S
H
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
3 8 ' - 2 1 /2 "
1 1 4 ' - 6 1 /2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
6
6
5
1
2
2
1
0
1
2
1 8 ' - 1 1 /2 "
6
9
4
13' - 101/2"75' - 1"12' - 101/2"
14
7
1
2
14
7
1
2
UN
I
T
A
B
O
V
E
B
R
E
E
Z
E
W
A
Y
9
1
1
2
C
L
4
0
0
35
4
35
35
4
20
4
1
2
1
0
0
3
7'
1
1
37
1
9
1
2
158' - 6"40' - 2"34' - 2"
2' - 3"34' - 2"198' - 71/2"23' - 21/2"
2'
5
4
1
0
33
6
3
1
2
21
4
1
9
8
1
1
9
9
2
7
0
1
2
0
0
1
2
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
ST
A
I
R
0
4
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:28:13
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 158
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
1
A
2
0
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
3
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
TR
A
S
H
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
75
6
3 8 ' - 2 1 /2 "
1 1 4 ' - 6 1 /2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
6
6
5
1
2
2
1
0
1
2
1 8 ' - 1 1 /2 "
6
9
4
13' - 101/2"75' - 1"12' - 101/2"
14
7
1
2
14
7
1
2
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
3
1
1
9
0
C
L
4
0
0
94
4
7
5
1
0
1
2
2
0
5
1
0
0
2
7'
1
1
37
1
9
1
2
23' - 21/2"198' - 71/2"34' - 2"2' - 3"
158' - 6"40' - 2"34' - 2"
21
4
1
9
8
1
1
9
9
2
7
0
1
2
0
0
1
2
2'
5
37
7
3
1
2
ST
O
R
A
G
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
1+
B
E
D
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
ST
A
I
R
0
4
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:28:26
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 159
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
1
A
2
0
3
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
TR
A
S
H
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
3 8 ' - 2 1 /2 "
1 1 4 ' - 6 1 /2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
6
6
5
1
2
2
1
0
1
2
6
9
4
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
3
1
1
9
0
PR
I
V
A
T
E
R
O
O
F
TE
R
R
A
C
E
56
0
20
4
1
2
1
0
0
3
18
4
2
1
2
12
0
0
1
2
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:28:38
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 160
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
1
A
2
0
3
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
TR
A
S
H
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
DS
DS
ID
F
PR
I
V
A
T
E
R
O
O
F
TE
R
R
A
C
E
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
B
R
I
D
G
E
B
E
L
OW
4
0
6
6
5
1
2
2
1
0
1
2
4
0
6
9
4
4
0
6
9
4
4
0
26' - 7"
RO
O
F
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
RO
O
F
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
PR
I
V
A
T
E
R
O
O
F
TE
R
R
A
C
E
C
L
4
0
0
66
4
66
4
2 ' - 0 "
2 2 5 ' - 1 0 "
2 ' - 0 "
18
4
2
1
2
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
EL
E
V
S
T
A
I
R
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:28:49
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 161
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
DN
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S L O P E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
S L O P E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S L O P E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S L O P E
SLOPE
S L O P E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE
S L O P E
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S L O P E
1
A
2
0
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
DA
S
H
E
D
L
IN
E
I
N
D
I
C
A
T
E
S
A
R
E
A
DE
S
I
G
N
A
T
E
D
F
O
R
F
U
T
U
R
E
S
O
L
A
R
PA
N
E
L
S
1
0
O
F
R
O
O
F
A
R
E
A
M
I
N
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
M
E
T
A
L
SC
R
E
E
N
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
M
E
T
A
L
SC
R
E
E
N
DS
DS
DS DS DS
DS
DS
DS
B
E
L
O
W
DS
DSDSDSDS
DS
DS
B
E
L
O
W
DS
BR
I
D
G
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
M
E
T
A
L
SC
R
E
E
N
ME
C
H
A
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
M SC
DS
DS
DS
DS
77
8
84
5
66
4
33
7
6' - 3"
2
9
7
7 ' - 6 "
94
4
6
1
1
2
7
2
9
1
7
5
1
2
1
0
7
6
1
2
7'
1
1
37
0
6
1
2
2'
5
37
5
1
1
1
2
41
0
1
1
9
9
2
3
1
0
7
2
9
1
2
4
6
3
1
23' - 21/2"232' - 91/2"2' - 3"
11' - 11/2"23' - 01/2"40' - 2"158' - 6"
7
7
5
1
9
6
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:29:04
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 162
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
1
6
2
15
13
7
1
7
3
2
EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
A
R
E
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
U
N
D
E
R
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
3
2
O
F
TH
E
2
0
1
6
C
B
C
20
1
6
C
B
C
3
2
0
2
3
3
E
N
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
O
R
M
O
R
E
F
E
E
T
AB
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
F
E
E
T
4
5
7
2
M
M
O
R
MO
R
E
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
23' - 9"
3
8
1
6
1
7
8
3
3
1
8
A
2
5
1
1
1
6
1
0
A
1
7
2
SO
U
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
1
1
6
1
0
A
1
7
1
WE
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:29:15
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
L
E
G
E
N
D
NO
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
1
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
2FIBERCEMENTPANEL
3
T
I
L
E
O
R
T
H
I
N
S
E
T
M
A
S
O
N
R
Y
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
4
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
A
C
C
E
N
T
P
A
N
E
L
5
M
E
C
H
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
6
P
E
R
F
O
R
A
T
E
D
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
7GLAZING
8
P
E
R
F
O
R
A
T
E
D
M
E
TA
L
B
A
L
U
S
T
R
A
D
E
9
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
10
G
L
A
Z
E
D
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
D
O
O
R
11
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
Y
S
T
E
M
12
M
T
L
P
A
N
E
L
13
D
E
C
O
R
T
I
V
E
M
E
T
A
L
F
I
N
14
C
A
N
O
P
Y
15
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
L
A
P
S
I
D
I
N
G
16
M
E
T
A
L
S
U
N
S
H
A
D
E
17
V
I
N
Y
L
W
I
N
D
O
W
18
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
19
J
U
L
I
E
T
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
20
S
T
E
E
L
B
R
I
D
G
E
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 163
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
15
2
8
15
7
2
7
8
6
5
7
15
2
7
8
7
8
8
7
2
8
15
3
2
5
A
2
5
2
1
1
6
1
0
A
1
8
2
EA
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
1
1
6
1
0
A
1
8
1
NO
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:29:24
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
L
E
G
E
N
D
NO
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
1
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
2
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
A
N
E
L
3
T
I
L
E
O
R
T
H
I
N
S
E
T
M
A
S
O
N
R
Y
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
4
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
A
C
C
E
N
T
P
A
N
E
L
5
M
E
C
H
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
6
P
E
R
F
O
R
A
T
E
D
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
7GLAZING
8
P
E
R
F
O
R
A
T
E
D
M
E
T
A
L
B
A
L
U
S
T
R
A
D
E
9
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
10
G
L
A
Z
E
D
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
D
O
O
R
11
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
Y
S
T
E
M
12
M
T
L
P
A
N
E
L
13
D
E
C
O
R
T
I
V
E
M
E
T
A
L
F
I
N
14
C
A
N
O
P
Y
15
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
L
A
P
S
I
D
IN
G
16
M
E
T
A
L
S
U
N
S
H
A
D
E
17
V
I
N
Y
L
W
I
N
D
O
W
18
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
19
J
U
L
I
E
T
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
20
S
T
E
E
L
B
R
I
D
G
E
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 164
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
GA
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
PROPERTYLINE
SHAREDPRIVATEDRIVE
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
GA
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
PROPERTYLINE
SHAREDPRIVATEDRIVE
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:29:31
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
1
1
6
1
0
A
1
9
2
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
N
O
R
T
H
S
O
U
T
H
1
1
6
1
0
A
1
9
1
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
N
O
R
T
H
S
O
U
T
H
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 165
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
GA
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
PROPERTYLINE
CAMPBELLLN
BO
I
L
E
R
RO
O
M
BI
K
E
ST
O
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
PROPERTYLINE
CAMPBELLLN
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
59' - 0"
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:29:36
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
1
1
6
1
0
A
2
0
2
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
E
A
S
T
W
E
S
T
1
1
6
1
0
A
2
0
1
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
E
A
S
T
W
E
S
T
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 166
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
WS
DW REF
K
L
K
W/D
WS
DW REF
V
L
L
K
L L
W/
D
V
WS
Q
DW REF
W/D
DW REF
1
B
E
D
70
7
S
F
LI
V
I
N
G
DI
N
I
N
G
KITCHEN
EN
T
R
2
B
E
D
99
0
S
F
LI
V
I
N
G
DI
N
I
N
G
KITCHEN
EN
T
R
Y
CL
O
S
E
T
BE
D
R
O
O
M
1
MA
S
T
E
R
BE
D
R
O
O
M
CL
O
S
E
T
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
3
B
E
D
11
8
0
S
F
LI
V
I
N
G
KITCHEN
DI
N
I
N
G
DE
N
O
F
F
I
C
E
BE
D
R
O
O
M
2
MA
S
T
E
R
BE
D
R
O
O
M
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
CLOSET
CL
O
S
E
T
EN
T
R
Y
CL
O
S
E
T
1
B 56
KITCHEN
DI
N
I
N
G
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:29:43
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
1
4
1
0
A
2
1
2
TY
P
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
1
4
1
0
A
2
1
3
TY
P
2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
1
4
1
0
A
2
1
4
TY
P
3
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
1
4
1
0
A
2
1
1
TY
P
J
R
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 167
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:29:47
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 168
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:29:50
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 169
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:29:53
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 170
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
F.O.S.
F.O.S.
FD
B
c
c
0
0
6
ST
U
C
C
O
R
E
T
U
R
N
NA
I
L
F
I
N
W
I
N
D
O
W
WD
F
R
A
M
I
N
G
S
S
D
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
M
A
T
SE
A
L
A
N
T
B
A
C
K
E
R
R
O
D
SI
L
L
B
E
L
O
W
ST
U
C
C
O
LE
V
E
L
1
33
4
0
LE
V
E
L
2
34
7
0
LE
V
E
L
3
35
9
0
LE
V
E
L
4
36
9
4
LE
V
E
L
5
37
9
8
LE
V
E
L
6
39
0
0
LE
V
E
L
7
40
0
4
FI
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
LA
P
S
I
D
I
N
G
WI
N
F
R
A
M
E
CO
L
O
R
O
2
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:30:01
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
3
1
0
A
2
5
4
TY
P
I
C
A
L
R
E
C
E
S
S
E
D
W
I
N
D
O
W
J
A
M
B
1
4
1
A
2
5
1
EN
L
A
1
4
1
0
A
2
5
2
EN
L
A
R
G
E
D
N
O
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 171
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
CO
L
O
R
0
2
C
O
L
O
R
0
3
CO
L
O
R
0
1
W
I
N
C
O
L
O
R
0
1
W
I
N
C
O
L
O
R
0
1
W
I
N
C
O
L
O
R
0
2
cBAR COPYRIGHTarchitects 8/28/20174:31:18
PM
BIM360://004-17009DublinCA/UDRDUBLIN-A.rvt
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
CO
L
O
R
S
CE
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
FI
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
I
D
I
N
G
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 172
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
PLANNING COMMISSIONMINUTES
Tuesday, November 14, 2017
Planning Commission October 24, 2017
Regular Meeting Page | 1
A Regular MeetingoftheDublin PlanningCommissionwas held on Tuesday,
November 14, 2017, in theCityCouncilChamber. Themeeting was called to order at
7:00 PM., by CommissionChair Mittan.
1. Call to Orderand Pledge of Allegiance
Attendee Name Title Status
Scott Mittan CommissionChair Present
Tara Bhuthim etheeCommission ViceChair Present
Amit Kothari Planning CommissionerPresent
Samir Qureshi Planning CommissionerPresent
Stephen W right Planning CommissionerPresent
2. Oral Communications
2.1. Public Comment
No publiccommentswere made.
3. Consent Calendar
3.1. Approvethe Minutes of the October 24, 2017 PlanningCommission
Meeting.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: StephenWright, Planning Commissioner
SECOND: ScottMittan, Commission Chair
AYES: Bhuthimethee, Kothari, Qureshi
3. WrittenCommunication - None.
4. Public Hearing
5.1. Transit Center Site A-3 Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage2
DevelopmentPlan, Site Development Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437
PLPA 2017-00036)
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 173
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Planning Commission October 24, 2017
Regular Meeting Page | 2
Martha Battaglia, AssociatePlanner, made a presentation and responded to
questionsposed by theCommission.
CommissionChairMittan opened the publichearing.
David Israel, Architectwith BARArchitects, madeapresentationonbehalfof the
Applicant and responded toquestionsposed bythe Commission.
David Fletcher, LandscapeArchitect withFletcherStudio, made a presentation
onbehalf of theApplicant and respondedtoquestions posed by theCommission.
ErikSteiner, SeniorDevelopment Associatewith UDR, INC., respondedto
questions posed by the Commission on behalfofthe Applicant.
Stuart Cook, Alameda CountySurplus Authority, providedpubliccomment.
SavinderJuneja, Dublin Resident, provided public comment.
Marie Marshall, Dublin Resident, providedpublic comment.
Marlene Massetti, Dublin Resident, provided publiccomment.
Yash Kunaraswamy, DublinResident, provided publiccomment.
AnthonyCataldo, Dublin Resident, providedpubliccomment.
Megan Jennings, Attorney for the Applicant, madeapresentation and responded
topubliccomments and questionsposed bythe Commission.
David Israel, Architect fromBARArchitects, responded to Publiccommentsand
questionsposed bythe Commission.
MarthaBattaglia, AssociatePlanner, responded to questionsposed bythe
Commission.
TimCremin, Assistant CityAttorney, responded to questionsposed bythe
Commission.
ThePlanningCommissionprovidedcomments onthe project.
On motion of Commissioner Kothari, seconded by CommissionerBhuthimethee,
andby unanimous vote, the Commission adopted:
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 174
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Planning Commission October 24, 2017
Regular Meeting Page | 3
RESOLUTIONNO. 17-12
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITYCOUNCILADOPT AN ORDINANCE
APPROVING PLANNED DEVELOPMENTREZONE AND RELATED STAGE 2
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FORTHETRANSITCENTERSITE A-3
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA 2017-00036
On motionof Commissioner Kothari, Seconded by CommissionerBhuthimethee,
and by unanimousvote, theCommissionAdopted:
RESOLUTIONNO. 17-13
RECOMMENDING THAT THECITY COUNCIL APPROVE A
SITEDEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMITFORTHETRANSITCENTERSITE A-3
PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA-2017-00036)
OnMotionof CommissionerQuereshi, Seconded by Commissioner
Bhuthimethee, and by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Wrightvoting No), and the
CommissionAdopted:
RESOLUTIONNO. 17-14
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITYCOUNCILAPPROVE
TENTATIVE MAP 8437 FOR THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3 PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA-2017-00036)
5. UnfinishedBusiness - None.
6. New Business - None.
8. Other Business – Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff,
includingcommittee reports andreports by CityCouncilrelatedtomeetings attended at
City expense (AB1234).
Commissioner Wright andCommissionChairMittanrequestedStaff provide
higherqualitydrawings and three-dimensionaldrawings on development
projects.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 175
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Planning Commission October 24, 2017
Regular Meeting Page | 4
Jeff Baker, AssistantCommunityDevelopmentDirector, clarified thatthe
applicant, not the City, produces the documents. Mr. Bakerstatedthatapplicants
arepresentingbasedon industry standardandthatcouldvarydepending on the
software programsand various formats utilized by Applicants. Mr. Baker stated
thatStaff will work with applicants on the quality of their submittal package to
ensure the best practices, toolsand resources are being utilized for future
submissions.
9. Adjournment
The meetingwas adjourned by Commission Chair Mittanat9:46 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
JeffBaker
Assistant CommunityDevelopment Director
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 176
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaglia
From: g- architect @comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 7:17 PM
To: Martha Battaglia
Subject: Ashton @ Dublin Station publiccomment: please review & forward re tonights Planning
Commission mtg.
Dear Ms Battaglia,
Amwriting you to express concern with variousaspects of the proposed Ashton -at- Dublin- Station
project. I believe Dublin deserves a proposal more suitable to maintaining a desirable quality of
life while enhancing our city. Kindlyshare thesecommentswith theentirePlanning Commission
during tonight's meeting.
1) Placing housing in suchclose proximity to the heavily congested 580 freeway poses a negative
health risk for any future resident, be they adult or child, ..due to the higher levels of air -born exhaust
particulates generated by vehicular traffic on 580. There is information, at the federal level, that
points to high level of pollutants in areas surrounding major roadways being generated by routine
stop & go traffic, particularly that of diesel -fuel trucks (580 in Dublincould be THE poster
child). Poor air quality creates higherinstances of pulmonary- related health issues (ex:bronchial &
sinus irritation, asthma). Therefore in theinterest providing healthy places for living, no housing
proposals should be considered south of Dublin Boulevard.
2) The proposed scale of theproject seemsexcessive given the height (85ft) and massing of adjacent
construction. The proposed project is massive, dark, & looming. The lack of a deeper sidewalk and
pedestrian -scale set - backs, coupled with its looming 85' height is trulyantithetical to creating a
pedestrian friendly presence on Dublin Boulevard. Typically a 20 -25' deep sidewalkpeppered with
seating and landscaping would be employed along the full frontage of a tall structure to helpmask its
largess along a street. The project turns its back on DublinBlvd with a long screened frontage &
token corner plaza. The aerial image is deceptive... masks the issuewith sunlight being prevented
from reachingthe sidewalk due to the project's massing. This will create a dark pedestrian route
along a narrow sidewalk. Much like Trumark's development further west on Dublin Blvd, the
streetscape at Ashton feels uninviting, cold andnot particularly safe. The proposal is clearly
not interested in the pedestrianexperience, nor in enhancingthedesign and feel of Dublin's main
thoroughfare.
3) The addition of the landscaped upper level is a nice amenity for residents, but unless accessible to
the public (& for good reason, like a retail destination), this upper space provides no benefit to the
city. The token corner plaza is, well..a token gesture. Without the connectivity toan inviting
pedestrian experience, no one will ever use the corner plaza. If a developer wants to provide a benefit
to the city, the benefit proposed shouldhave a meaningful impact on improving thequality of life in
our city.
4) Lastly, our city is experiencing a dramatic population growth. Unfortunately infrastructure is not
keeping up. Our roads are jammed and our schools are overcrowded. Adding more housing without
providing a thorough plan to effectively meet the growth- related infrastructure needsof ourcurrent
residents, never mind future ones, is unconscionable. Civic leaders can no longer ignore theperils of
approvingdevelopment willy -nilly withoutensuring Dublin schools canhouse the studentsgenerated
by these developments, as well as resolving theadditional vehicular traffic generated by new
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 177
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
f i
proposals. Ignorance is bliss, put its still ignorance. Until a thorough and well- funded plan for
addressing Dublin's infrastructure woes is enacted, no morehomes should be built.
In summary, theproject is "too big for its britches ", does little to enhance the civic appealof our city,
ignores air - quality issues, and would burden Dublin's already inadequateinfrastructure. So
just because youcanbuild it, doesn't mean youshould. I kindlyask the commission to reconsider this
project in light of theseissues. I ask that the commission putthe health and wellbeing of its residents,
current and future, ahead of enticing eye -wash and promises. Your decisionsmake this city what it is,
and what it can be. Please reject the Ashton @ Dublin Stationproposal.
Sincerely,
GabrielleBlackman
Dublin Resident
2
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 178
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaolia
From: Jegadheesa Murugesan <mjpandian @gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 5:43 PM
To: Martha Battaglia; City Council
Subject: Ashton at DublinStation (Transit Center Site A -3)
Rezoning and adding more homes is notthe need of this town right now.
It needs infrastructure (Roads, Schools, congestion relief)>
Schoolsare overcrowded, traffic is a messand adding more homes doesn't solve this problem.
Please consider not approving this.
Thanks
Jega
1
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 179
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaalia
From: W Liu <I_wf @hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4 :57PM
To: City Council; Martha Battaglia
Subject: Vote NO to this housing project
Dear City Mayor andCouncil members
Please vote NO to this new housing project. Furthermore, I would strongly urge you to vote NO to any new
housing projects in the future, unless DUSD and thecity find a solution to address the school overcrowding
issue.
Best regards,
Dublin resident
Commission Hearing this Tuesdayon 220 MORE Housing Units Proposed Project on
2.36 acres, 7 stories, 85 ft Fligh!
COMMUNITY RESPONSE NEEDED 'fell Commissioners & Council to "VOTE NO on 'Ashton at Dublin Station' Project." E-
mail Commission by 3:00 p.m.Tues. to Planner: martha .battagliaLa)dubiin.ca.govE -mail City Council at:
council (dublin.ca.gov ATTENDPLANNING COMMISSION HEARING: Tuesday, November 14th, 7:00p.m. at CityHall,
100 Civic Plaza, Dublin. Below: "ASHTON ATDUBLIN STATION" PROJECT (TRANSIT CENTER SITE A -3): Staff
Report: http: / /dubIinca.igm2,com /Citizens /FilcOpen.aspx ?Type =1 &ID= 1208 &lnline =Trnue Project Location: Northwest corner
of Campbell Lane & DeMarcus Boulevard
1
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 180
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaglia
From: Betty Hudak <bettboop12 @yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 2:49 PM
To: Martha Battaglia; City Council
Subject: housing
Please vote NO on the "Ashton at Dublin Station" project. As long time residents of
Dublin, we are tired of all the building., housing, traffic, and congestion. It is so sad that
Dublin has lost its small townappeal and charm. We would ask that you reconsider
other housing /building projects as well. Let's leave some open space for the next
generation to enjoy!
Sincerely,
Betty and Norb Hudak
i
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 181
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Ba tta2iia
From: Chris <chris_p2 @earthlink.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 12:38 PM
To: Martha Battaglia
Subject: Transit Center Site A -3 (PLPA -2017- 00036) Project Description: The property owner,
Ashton at Dublin Station
Dear Martha,
Pleaseallow me to present to you some issues regarding the above project which I would request be
taken into account prior to approval to start construction. We would requestthat thisemail be
included in thedocuments /agendaregardingthePlanning Commitee meeting to beheld today.
1) Dust and debris caused by construction that will inevitably effect our complex at Elan. This is a
severe health problem and present during earthmoving and at other stages of a construction. Please
detail the measures that will be applied to minimizethis impact on the adjacent communities City of
Dublin ConstructionApprovalDocuments and verifyimplementation of the mitigations.
2) Noise issues. Restrictionsrequested to limit noise outside normal working hours due to the effects
on the adjacent communitieswheremany children arepresent.
3) Traffic issues. Duringthe construction of the Avalon Ii & III, construction traffic related to
earthworks stopped traffic on DeMarcus Blvd. Please ensure that an adequate Traffic Management.
Flan and severe constructiontrafficrestrictions on DeMarcus Blvd are incorporated into the binding
City of DublinConstruction ApprovalDocuments. We would request that these issues /mitigations be
monitored closely during construction by the City of Dublin building staff..
4) Rodent Issues. With the start of construction in Camp Parks for the BoulevardDevelopment, our
Elan community was invaded by rodents which is verydangerous to health and in the adjacent
communities there are manychildren. Rodents penetrated dwellings in the Elan community and apart
from potentially sufferingbites from rodents we have faeces left by them with the attached risk of
serious illness. Please request that mitigation measures be instigated to stop this occurring. We
would request that these measures be publishedforpublicknowledge and their implementation
monitored prior to and during construction by theCity ofDublinbuilding staff.
Thank you,
Chris Page
5501 DeMarcus Blvd Apt 203
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 182
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaglia
From: Val <gereva @yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 12:55 PM
To: Martha Battaglia
Subject: Nov. 14th town meeting
Martha,
Asone of manyconcerned citizens in the area in direct proximity tothe development under
discussion atthetown meeting on November 14th, I havelisted a numberof issues I and many
others would appreciate attention to; with a plan of action to mitigate the issues that have arisen with
past new developments in the area.
1) Dust and debris causedby construction that will inevitably affect our freshly painted complex at
Elan. It would be greatly appreciated and appropriate to have the developer arrange, coordinate, and
payfor window washing and building pressure washing for Elan once the development is completed.
2) Noseissues: ways to mitigate, and attention in respect to the early hours & weekends
3) Traffic issues: ways to mitigate in consideration to Elan residents
4) Fieldmice /rodent displacement fromconstruction causing them to run to Elan garage spaces. The
most recent nearby development broughtover 350 field mice (counting only the ones caught in
common areatraps) with hundreds of man hours requiredtolay traps, collect, and dispose. In
addition, many individual owners' garageswere infested, requiring cleaning out droppings, urination,
destroyed property, and trapsfull of dozens and dozens more fieldmice. Individual garage cleaning
required removing all items in garage(s) atleast 6 times due to continued and reoccurring
infestations over many months.
5) Dog feces increased on Campbell Green grounds and around thenearby communitiesof Elan
and Avalon: Hundreds of pet owners visitdailythis communalspace for their dogs to utilize for
elimination. However, and unfortunately, numerous dog ownersrefuse to pick up after their dogs. A
company has been hired named "White Magic" to pick up the dog waste which has helpedat some
level, but only covers certainareas for limiteddays per week. There are 3 complexes that pay for
this, but would be widely appropriate for the new development to contribute to thisregular fee, with
anincreaseofterritorywidening, and with increased visits to handle theinevitableincreaseofdog
waste. Clearly, it intensifies in quantity with each new development utilizingthe samesmallareas for
dog elimination.
Possiblesolutions that may be more effective than weekly attempts for dog waste pick up: Some
communities are having greatsuccess withrequiring all dog owners in the community to have their
dog feces sampled and identified for its DNAsequencing. If owners do not pick up their pet waste,
then theyare identified and fined, increasing witheach discovery. Of course all communities in the
areawould have to sign on and cooperate, enforcing samplessubmission by petowners as part of
their lease requirement, for lab analysis and its enforcement of pet owners failure to comply.
These pastnearby new developments have shown a significant increase with theabove mentioned
problems. We would like tonot only bring awareness to these factors, but more importantly, to set a
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 183
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
plan of action in place toprL.ant and at the least, inhibit the
prolI
ns associatedwith these points
as much as possible.
Thank you,
Elan resident
2
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 184
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaalia
From: kerriechabot @comcast.net
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 4:31 PM
To: Martha Battaglia
Subject: upcoming projectTransit center
Hello Martha,
I am writing to you regarding Transit Center Site A -3 (PLPA- 2017 - 00036). Please pass my concerns to the planning
commission.
This project is not good for our city. The height and the layout do not in any way complement the area. This is not what
Dublin needs. Additionally, the schools androads around that area will not hold any moreresidents until better
infrastructure has been planned. Please do what is right for Dublin.
Sincerely,
Kerrie Chabot 18 year resident of Dublin.
1
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 185
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
MarthaBattaglia
From: David Bewley <davidbewley @comcast.net>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 3:38PM
To: Martha Battaglia
Subject: TransitCenter Site A -3 (PLPA -2017- 00036)
Hi Martha,
I am unable to attend the upcoming meeting regarding Transit Center Site A -3 (PLPA- 2017- 00036).
Please forward my comment that Residential Development in this retail area that is 7 stories tall on 2.36acres it too
dense and will notresult in a public benefit for the Dublin Community as a whole. Although I assume it is not designed
as family oriented, it will also impact our congested school system which should be at least mentioned as a possible
adverse impact.
I fully understand that the Planning Commission is not the SchoolBoard. However, to use the procedural differentiation
of "separation" of "powers" or agencies as an excuse to plan for additional development without any consideration of
its impacts on the City of Dublin as a whole which should include a respect for theimpacts of all known areas such as
school crowing, is in my opinion an abuse of process.
There should be a coordination betweenthe different agencies in our local government in order to have effective
planning.
Please forward my commentsto all parties.
Thank you,
David Bewley
11166 Brittany Lane
Dublin, CA
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 186
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaalia
From: Karen <kagonzl @comcast.net>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:25 PM
To: Martha Battaglia
Cc: City Council; Arun Goel
Subject: VOTE NO on 'Ashton at Dublin Station' Project
Martha andDublinCityCouncil — Please vote NOT on theAshton at Dublin Station Project. As a long -time WestDublin
homeowner, I'm appalled at the out of control growth in our area. Also, the city planning's focus appears to be on East
Dublin rather thanrefreshing or paying attention to theWest side (we pay taxes as welll)
Over the weekend, there was strongparticipation on the NextDoorapplication as many of us expressed our concern and
frustration over Dublin's crowded and ugly conditions. We're urging citizens to get involved and vote for council
members that follow- through on their promises.
Thank you.
Karen Gonzales
925 640 -2740
1
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 187
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaalia
From: ingrid register <I.Crackers @hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 5:45 PM
To: Martha Battaglia
Subject: Fw: ashton project
Ingrid Register a.k.a. Crackers the Clown
From: ingrid register
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 5:43 PM
io: council dubiin.ca -gov; marthabattaglia@dublin.ca.gov
Subject: ashton project
DerCouncil members and Martha,
I am asking you to vote NO on the ashton at Dublin project. Our town is so congested, so overcrowded
Please listen to what the residents want as you said you would do when you were elected.
Thank you
Ingrid register
I
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 188
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaalia
From: Susan Rinetti <sue @rinettiandassociates.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 6:24PM
To: Martha Battaglia
Subject: Vote No at Ashton, Dublin Station please
We don't need anymore houses.... have you seenthe traffic? Schools are a mess andwe don't needmore housing here
Please vote no. Dublin used to be a cute little town. Now it looks like Orange County.
have lived here 10 years and can't believe the amount of change ... and not for the good. Just overcrowding ... greedy
developers.
Please!
Sue Rinetti
11422 Winding Trail Lane
Dublin, CA 94568
1
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 189
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Martha Battaglia
From: MikeHeim <mitynerp @yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:08 PM
To: Martha Battaglia
Subject: Ashton at Dublin Station Project
Please vote "no" on 'Ashton atDublin Station' Project. This once quiet and nice town is already becoming severelyovercrowded. It takes 20 min just to drive across town now. Each newresidence adds at least one car (often 2 or more) to our crowdedstreets. Please vote no on this and all future additions.
Thank you,
Michael Helm
Sent from my Wad
1
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 190
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Commissioners Mittan, Bhutimethee, Kothari, Wright & Qureshi:
Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A -3) should summarily be rejected by the PlanningCommissionthiseveningabsentanyrecommendedchanges. The project does not meet the goals
and objectives set forth under the GeneralPlan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) in its
architectural design, quality of materials or compatibility within the Transit Center.
The 220 units proposed are not vested. There is no legal requirement for the Commission (or
Council) to recommend or approvethe construction of the residential project; vesting the project.
ASHTON PROJECT ISN'T COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT STRUCTURES IN THETRANSITCENTER.
The proposedproject: 85' tall, 220 units on 2.36 acres is more denseand taller thanother projects
in the Transit Center. It's height is NOT consistent with surroundingbuildings. ComparingAshtonproject's lowest point roof lines disregardsthe fact that the development (at its center)
reaches a height of 85' towering above the Elan and Avalon projects. The Ashton project is also
NOT similar in "scale and size" to otherresidentialprojects in the TransitCenter with fewer
stories and less density.
If approved, the AshtonProject would be the HIGHEST DENSITY inthe Transit with 93.2 units
per acre! The current zoning allows for a minimum of 25.1 units per acre. The number of units
proposed far exceeds the current, minimum zoning.
The Commission should reject the project. It's height, density and architecturaldesign is NOT
consistent with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
ASHTON PROJECT DOES NOT REFLECT EDSP HIGH QUALITY
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OR MATERIALS:
The Ashton Project does not reflect a "highquality" of materialsorarchitecturaldesign for
Dublin's future. The architectural design does NOT enhance the Transit Center nor does the
building complement the surrounding town homes and condominiums in the Transit Center.
Thedesign with twooverhanging roofs and "access to the units primarily from interior corridors
with theexception of the stoop units along the private street facingCamellia Place..." is an
enclave. The materials of the project are primarily stucco and metal; not reflective of higher
quality material or design in the EDSP andGeneral Plan.
Arguably the "character, scale and quality of the designand architectural relationship with otherbuildings" is not "harmonious" to this site or the surroundingprojects.
ASHTON AT DUBLINSTATION DOES NOT CONTRIBUTE TO APEDESTRIAN
FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT:
The project is an apartment complex, 7 stories high with two story parking on the bottom two
floors. The project's exterior does not contribute to a pedestrian friendly environment with metal
screening on the ground floor.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 191
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
THE PROJECT WILL CONTRIBUTE TO MORE OVERCROWDING & UNITS THAT
ARENOT SUSTAINABLE:
An additional 220units on 2.36 units will further negatively impactour schools, traffic and
quality of life. Higher densities result in more "Community Benefits" (moneyor other benefits
from developers forDublin) but at what cost?
The Planning Commission should rejectAshton at Dublin Station. It does not contribute ANY
units for low income level householdsunder RIINA; allowingonly 22 units for moderate income
levels; for family of four, 80 -117k. It does not meet the level of excellence set forth in our
General Planor Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. It is not compatible with surrounding projects and
will further burden our City's infrastructure.
Marlene Massetti
Dublin Resident
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 192
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
1
RESOLUTIONNO. 17 - 12
A RESOLUTIONOFTHE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THECITY COUNCILADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING
PLANNED DEVELOPMENTREZONE ANDRELATEDSTAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
THE TRANSIT CENTERSITE A-3
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA 2017-00036
WHEREAS, theApplicant, Ashton at DublinStation, is proposing to construct a
residentialproject comprised of 220 units, residentialamenitiesincluding afitnesscenter, pool,
roof top lounge, and 331 spacesofstructuredparking onan approximately 2.36-acre site
located on Site A-3 in the DublinTransitCenter. Theproposed development and applications
are collectively known asthe “Project”; and
WHEREAS, theapplicationsincludePlannedDevelopmentRezone with arelatedStage
2 Development Plan, SiteDevelopmentReview Permit, and Tentative Map8437; and
WHEREAS, the projectSite is located at the northwestcorner of Campbell Laneand
DeMarcusBoulevard within theEastern Dublin SpecificPlan area, and morespecificall y within
the Dublin TransitCenter; and
WHEREAS, the CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct (CEQA), together with the State
CEQAGuidelinesandCityenvironmentalregulations require that certain projectsbe reviewed
for environmentalimpacts and thatenvironmentaldocumentsbeprepared. To comply with
CEQA, the Cityprepared a CEQAAnalysis in Supportof a SpecificPlanExemption; and
WHEREAS, Staffrecommends that theproject be foundexempt from CEQA pursuantto
GovernmentCode65457 for residentialprojects that areconsistent with a specific plan. The
project is within the scopeof the FinalEnvironmental Impact Report for the Dublin Transit
Center General PlanAmendment, EasternDublinSpecificPlanAmendment, Stage 1 Planned
DevelopmentZoning, TentativeParcelMap, and DevelopmentAgreement (SCH 2001120395)
which was certified bythe CityCouncilResolution No. 215 -02 datedNovember19, 2002. The
CEQA analysis prepared forthe projectdetermined that noeventasspecified in Section 21166
of thePublic Recourses Codehas occurred since the certification of the DublinTransitSpecific
Plan EIRthatrequirespreparationof a Supplemental CEQA document; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated November 14, 2017 was submittedto the Planning
CommissionrecommendingCityCouncil approval of the proposedproject; and
WHEREAS, thePlanningCommissionheld a properlynoticedpublichearing on the
project on November 14, 2017, at which time all interestedparties had the opportunity tobe
heard; and
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 193
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
WHEREAS, thePlanning Commission did hearand useits independentjudgement and
considered allsaid reports, recommendations, and testimonyhereinabove set forth prior to
making its recommendation on the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that theforegoing recitals are trueand correct
and madeapartof this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDthat the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council findthe projectexemptfromCEQApursuant to GovernmentCode 65457andadopt the
Ordinance attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, which Ordinance
RezonestheTransitCenter SiteA-3 project site to PlannedDevelopment andapproves a
related Stage 2Development Plan . The Planning Commission recommendation is based onthe
StaffReport analysis and recommendation and on the findings set forth in the attacheddraft
Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November2017, bythe
following votes:
AYES: Mittan, Bhuthimethee, Kothari, Qureshi, Wright
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PlanningCommission Chair
ATTEST:
Assistant CommunityDevelopment Director
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036Parcel A-3 Stage 2 PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\7. PC Reso 17-12 recommending that the CityCouncil adopt an Ordinance Rezoning
the DublinTransit CenterSite A-3.DOC
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 194
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
RESOLUTIONNO. 17 - 13
A RESOLUTIONOFTHE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THECITY COUNCIL APPROVE A
SITEDEVELOPMENTREVIEW PERMIT FORTHE TRANSIT CENTERSITE A-3 PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA-2017-00036)
WHEREAS, theApplicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing toconstruct a
residentialproject comprised of 220 units, residentialamenitiesincluding a fitnesscenter, pool,
roof top lounge, and 331 spacesofstructuredparkingon an approximately 2.36 -acre site
located on Site A-3 in the DublinTransit Center. Theproposed development and applications
are collectively known asthe “Project”; and
WHEREAS, theapplicationsinclude a PlannedDevelopmentRezone with a related
Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and TentativeMap8437; and
WHEREAS, the projectSite is located at the northwestcorner of Campbell Lane and
DeMarcusBoulevard within the Eastern Dublin SpecificPlanarea, and more specifically within
the DublinTransit Center; and
WHEREAS, the CaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA), together with the State
guidelinesandCity environmentalregulations, requirethat certain projects be reviewed for
environmentalimpacts and that environmentaldocuments be prepared. Tocomply withCEQA,
the Cityprepared a CEQA Analysis in Support of aSpecificPlanExemption; and
WHEREAS, Staffrecommends that theproject be foundexempt from CEQA pursuantto
GovernmentCode65457 for residentialprojects that areconsistent with a specificplan. The
project is within the scope of theFinalEnvironmentalImpactReport for theDublinTransit
Center General PlanAmendment, EasternDublinSpecificPlanAmendment, Stage 1 Planned
DevelopmentZoning, Tentative ParcelMap, andDevelopment Agreement (SCH 2001120395)
which was certified bythe CityCouncilResolution No. 215 -02 datedNovember19, 2002. The
CEQA analysis prepared forthe projectdetermined that noeventasspecified in Section 21166
of thePublicRecourses Codehas occurred since the certificationof the Dublin Transit Specific
Plan EIRthatrequirespreparationof a Supplemental CEQA document; and
WHEREAS, a StaffReportdated November 14, 2017, wassubmitted tothe Planning
Commission recommending CityCouncilapprovaloftheproposed project; and
WHEREAS, thePlanningCommissionheld a public hearing on said applicationon
November 14, 2017, at which timeall interested partieshad the opportunity tobeheard; and
WHEREAS, propernotice of said hearing was given in all respects as required by law;
and
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 195
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
2
WHEREAS, thePlanning Commission did hearand useits independentjudgement and
considered allsaid reports, recommendations, and testimonyhereinabove set forth prior to
making its recommendation on the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, thattheforegoing recitals aretrue and correct
and madeapartof this Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthe Planning Commissionof
the City of Dublin, based on thefindings in the attachedResolution, recommend s thattheCity
Councilfind the project exempt fromCEQApursuanttoGovernment Code 65457 and adopt the
Resolutionattached as Exhibit A, which Resolutionapproves the Site DevelopmentReview
Permit.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEDthis 14th day of November 2017 bythe following
vote:
AYES: Mittan, Bhuthimethee, Kothari, Qureshi, Wright
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PlanningCommission Chair
ATTEST:
Assistant CommunityDevelopment Director
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036 Parcel A-3 Stage 2 PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\CC Attachments\8. PC Resolution 17-13 recommending that the
City Council approve the SDR for Site A-3.doc
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 196
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
RESOLUTIONNO. 17 - 14
A RESOLUTIONOFTHE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITYCOUNCIL APPROVE
TENTATIVE MAP 8437 FOR THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3 PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA-2017-00036)
WHEREAS, theApplicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing to construct a
residentialproject comprised of 220 units, residentialamenitiesincluding a fitnesscenter, pool,
roof top lounge, and 331 spacesofstructuredparkingon an approximately 2.36 -acre site
located on Site A-3 in the DublinTransitCenter. The proposeddevelopment and applications
are collectively known asthe “Project”; and
WHEREAS, theapplicationsincludePlannedDevelopmentRezone with a related Stage
2 Development Plan, SiteDevelopmentReview, andTentativeMap8437; and
WHEREAS, the projectSite is located at the northwestcorner of Campbell Lane and
DeMarcusBoulevard within the Eastern Dublin SpecificPlanarea, and more specifically within
the DublinTransit Center; and
WHEREAS, the CaliforniaEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State
guidelinesandCity environmentalregulations, requirethat certain projects be reviewed for
environmentalimpacts and that environmentaldocuments be prepared. Tocomply withCEQA,
the Cityprepared a CEQA Analysis in Support of a SpecificPlanExemption; and
WHEREAS, Staffrecommends that theproject be foundexempt from CEQA pursuantto
GovernmentCode65457 for residentialprojects that areconsistent with a specificplan. The
project is within the scopeof the FinalEnvironmentalImpactReport for the Dublin Transit
Center General PlanAmendment, EasternDublinSpecificPlanAmendment, Stage 1 Planned
DevelopmentZoning, Tentative ParcelMap, andDevelopment Agreement (SCH 2001120395)
which was certified bythe CityCouncilResolution No. 215-02 datedNovember19, 2002. The
CEQA analysis prepared forthe projectdetermined that noeventasspecified in Section 21166
of thePublicRecourses Codehas occurred since the certificationof the DublinTransitSpecific
Plan EIRthatrequirespreparationof a Supplemental CEQA document; and
WHEREAS, a StaffReportdated November 14, 2017, wassubmitted tothe Planning
Commission recommending CityCouncilapprovaloftheproposed project; and
WHEREAS, thePlanningCommissionheld a publichearing on said application on
November 14, 2017, at which timeall interested partieshad the opportunity tobeheard; and
WHEREAS, propernotice of said hearing was given in all respects as required by law;
and
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 197
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
2
WHEREAS, thePlanningCommission did hearand useits independentjudgement and
considered allsaid reports, recommendations, and testimonyhereinabove set forth prior to
making its recommendation on the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, thattheforegoing recitals aretrueandcorrect
and madeapartof this Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthe Planning Commissionof
the City of Dublin, based on thefindings in the attachedResolution, recommend s thattheCity
Councilfind the project exempt fromCEQApursuant to Government Code 65457 and adopt the
Resolutionattached as Exhibit A, whichResolutionapproves the TentativeMap 8437.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November 2017bythe following
vote:
AYES: Mittan, Bhuthimethee, Kothari, Qureshi,
NOES: Wright
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PlanningCommission Chair
ATTEST:
Assistant CommunityDevelopment Director
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036 Parcel A-3 Stage 2 PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\CC Attachments\9. PC Reso 17-17 recommending that the City
Council approve theTentative Map for Site A-3.doc
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 198
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Ashton at Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of Specific Plan Exemption
November 8, 2017
Planning ApplicationNumber: PLPA-2017-00036
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 199
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton at Dublin Station Addendum
Page 1
11/8/17
Ashton at Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of SpecificPlan Exemption
PLPA-2017-00036
November8, 2017
The proposed project (Ashton at Dublin Station) includes the construction of a 220-unitmulti-
family residentialdevelopment on a 2.36-acre (net) site located on the northwest of the corner
of DeMarcusBoulevard and Campbell Lane in the City of Dublin (commonly referred to as Site
A-3). At its tallest point, the building is five stories over two levels of parking (seven stories
total). The proposed project meets the parking requirement of 1.5 spaces per unit as it
proposes to provide 331 parking spaces on-site within a parking garage.
The project site is located in the Dublin Transit Center, as well as the Transit Village Center
subarea of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) area. The proposed project is part of the
pre-existing entitlements defined in the 2002 Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Planned
Development (PD) Rezone and General Plan/Specific Plan amendment. The project requires
approval of a Stage 2 Planned Development Zoning, a Tentative Tract Map, and a Site
Development Review Permit.
The Dublin TransitCenter requires15% of the residential units be affordable units. The Camellia
Place apartmentproject on Site A-2 has been used to satisfy the very low and lowportion of
the inclusionary housing requirement for the project. Ten percent (10%) of the units in the
proposed project are required to be affordable to moderate income households earning
between 80% and 120% ofthe area medianincome adjusted for actual household size. The
project proposes to set aside 10% of the 220 units (22 units) for moderate income households.
Prior CEQA Analysis
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin TransitCenter Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by the City Council
on November 19, 2002, by City Council Resolution No. 215-02. This EIR analyzed amendments
to the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP), a Stage 1 Planned
Development Zoning, a Parcel Map and a DevelopmentAgreement.
The EIR contains mitigation measures that will be applied to any development withinthe project
area, including the proposed project. Specific mitigation measures are notedin the Initial Study
for the proposed project. The EIR identified significantandunavoidableimpacts with respect to
project exceedances of Bay Area Air Quality Management District air quality standards on a
project and cumulative level, cumulative traffic impacts , and impacts to mainline freeway
segments.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 200
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton at Dublin Station Addendum
Page 2
11/8/17
The project qualifies for a statutory exemption from CEQA under Gov’t Code section 65457 for
residentialprojects that areconsistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been certified
Exemption). The Exemptionstates:
a) Any residentialdevelopment project, including any subdivision, or anyzoning change
that is undertaken to implement and is consistent with a specific plan for which an
environmental impact report has been certified after January 1, 1980, is exempt from the
requirements of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources
Code. However, if after adoption of the specific plan, an event as specified in Section
21166 of the Public Resources Code occurs, the exemptionprovidedby this subdivision
does not apply unless and unt il a supplemental environmental impact report for the
specific plan is prepared and certified in accordance with the provisions of Division13
commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code. After a supplemental
environmental impact report is certified, the exemption specified inthis subdivision
applies to projectsundertaken pursuant to the specific plan.”
The City has reliedon this Exemption for CEQA compliance for all other residentialprojects
within the Transit SpecificPlan area. This document addresses the component of the
Exemption of whether an event as specified in Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code has
occurred since the certification of the Dublin TransitCenter EIR that requires preparation of a
supplemental CEQA document (EIR or MND).
Existing Entitlements
Sites A, B and C comprise the portion of area of the Dublin Transit Center designated as
residential. They all have the GP/EDSP land use designation of HighDensityResidential except
for Site A-1, which is designated Medium-HighDensity Residential. A total of 1,500 units are
allocated to sitesA, B and C and the proposed project represents the last residential
development project within these sites of the Dublin Transit Center project area.
As shown in Table A-1: Dublin Transit Center Development & Entitlements, the total number of
units constructed in Site A, including the proposed project, would be 384 units, 46 units less
than the 430 units allocated . Per the Dublin Transit Center EIR, the total number of residential
units constructed in Site A, B and C, including the proposed project, would be 1,451 units, 49
units less than the total allocation of 1,500 units.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 201
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton at Dublin Station Addendum
Page 3
11/8/17
Table A-1: DublinTransit Center Development & Entitlem ents
Site
Units
Constructed/Proposed Units Permitted 1 Difference
Site A 2 384 430 (46)
Site B 562 565 (3)
Site C 505 505 0
Total 1,451 1,500 (49)
Notes:
1. Per Dublin TransitCenter Stage 1 Development Plan, as amended.
2. Includes proposed project.
The proposed projectwould not exceed the allocation of residential units envisioned for Site A,
nor the overall units allocated to Site A, B and C under the Dublin Transit Center project (1500),
and is therefore consistent with the development plans as analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter
EIR.
Proposed CEQA Analysis in this Document
As stated above, the City of Dublin has determined thatthe project qualifies for a statutory
exemption from CEQA under Gov’t Code section65457. The proposed project is consistent
with the general plan land use designation for Site A-3 and is similar in unit count to the Dublin
TransitCenter Specific Plan. An EIR has been certified for the Dublin TransitCenter Specific
Plan. This document finds that no event as specified in Section 21166 of the Public Resources
Codehas occurred since the certification of the Dublin Transit Center Specific Plan EIR that
requires preparation of a supplemental CEQA document (EIR or MND).
Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
Public Resources Code section21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 identify the
conditions requiring subsequent environmental review. After a review of these conditions, the
City has determined that no subsequent EIR or negativedeclaration is required for thisproject.
This isbased on the following analysis:
a) Are there substantial changes to the project requiring major revisions to the EIR due
to new or substantially more severe significant impacts than previously identified?
There are no substantial changes to the project analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center
EIR. As demonstrated in the attached document, the proposedland uses on the project
site are not a substantial change to thosepreviously proposed and analyzed, and will
not result in additional significantimpacts, and no additional or different mitigation
measures are required. This is documented inthe attached analysis.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 202
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton at Dublin Station Addendum
Page 4
11/8/17
b) Are there substantial changes in the conditions which the project is undertaken
requiringmajor revisions to the EIR due to new or substantially more severe
significant impacts than previously identified?
There are no substantial changes in the conditions assumed in previous CEQA analysis
involving new or substantially more severe significant impacts than previously
identified. This is documented in the attached analysis.
c) Is there new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could
not have been known at the time of the previous EIR was complete that shows the
project will havea significant effect not addressed in the previous EIR; or previous
effects are more severe; or, previously infeasible mitigation measures or alternatives
are now feasible but the Applicant declined to adopt them; or mitigation measures or
alternatives considerably different from those in the previous EIR would substantially
reduce significant effects but the Applicant declines to adopt them?
As documented in the attached analysis, there is no new information showing a new or
more severe significant effect beyond those identified in the prior CEQA document .
Similarly, there are no new or different feasible mitigation measures or alternatives to
reducesignificant effects of the project which the Applicant declines to adopt. All
previously adoptedmitigationscontinue to apply to the project. The CEQA document
adequately describes the impacts and mitigations associated with the proposed project.
d) Should a subsequent EIR or negative declaration be prepared?
No subsequent EIR, Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required
because there are no impacts, significant or otherwise, of the project beyond those
identifiedin the previous CEQA analysis, as documented in the attached analysis.
Conclusion
The attached document determines that the proposedProject and its impacts were previously
analyzed inthe Dublin Transit Center Specific Plan EIR and none ofthe standards for a
subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration under CEQA Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections
15162 and15163are met. Therefore, the CEQA exemption under Government Code section
665457 applies to the project.
The attached document, the Dublin Transit Center EIR, and all resolutions cited above are
incorporated hereinby reference and are available for public review during normal business
hours in the CommunityDevelopment Department, Dublin City Hall, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin , CA.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 203
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Ashton at Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of Specific Plan Exemption
November 8, 2017
Planning ApplicationNumber: PLPA-2017-00036
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 204
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
Page i
Table of Contents
Background & Project Description 1
Environmental Analysis 7
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Vicinity and Location
Figure 2: Dublin Transit Center Land Use Plan
Figure 3: Aerial Perspective
Figure4a: Level 1 Floor Plan
Figure 4b: Level 3 Floor Plan
Figure 4c: Level 6Floor Plan
Figure5a: View FromSoutheast Corner – Campbell Lane and DeMarcusBoulevard
Figure 5b: View FromSouthwest Corner – Campbell Lane
Figure 5c: View From Northwest Corner – Campbell Lane
Figure 5d: View From Northeast Corner – DeMarcus Boulevard
Figure 6: Preliminary LandscapePlan
Figure 7: Preliminary Grading Plan
Figure 8: Preliminary Utility Plan
Figure 9: Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan
Figure 10: Preliminary Erosion Control Plan
Figure 11: Fault TrenchLocations
Figure 12: Flood Hazard Area
Note: All figures are included at the end of the document.
List of Tables
Table 1: Dublin Transit Center Development & Entitlements
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 205
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 1
Ashton at Dublin Station
Background & ProjectDescription
Project Title
Ashton at Dublin Station
Lead Agency
City of Dublin
Community Development Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Contact
Martha Battaglia
Associate Planner
Phone: 925-452-2152
martha.battaglia@dublin.ca.gov
Project Location & Setting
The project site (APN 986-0034-009-00) is located in eastern Dublin, boundedby Campbell Lane
to the west and south, DeMarcusBoulevard to the east, and a proposed shared privatedrive to
the north (just south of Dublin Boulevard). See Figure 1: Project Vicinity and Location.
The project site is paved and has previously been used as a parking lot and a construction
staging site.
Project Applicant
Ashton at Dublin Station, LLC
1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200
Highlands Ranch, CO 80129
General Plan Designation
High Density Residential
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 206
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 2
Zoning
PD Planned Development (PA 00-013/ORD. 21-02)
ProjectDescription
The project Applicant has applied for a Planned Development Zoning Stage 2 Development Plan
Site Development Review Permit (SDR), and Tentative Map. Figures illustrating the proposed
project are shown at the end of this document and arereferenced therein.
The 2.36-acre project site is bounded by DeMarcus Boulevard to the east, Campbell Lane to the
south and west, and a private through-block drive to the north. The Iron HorseRegional Trail
runs northwest to southeast next to the project site's southwestcorner. Currently, the project
site is paved with minimal topographical change other than slight slopes for drainage .
Residential developments surround the project site to the west, north and east. A BART surface
parking lot and a PG&E electrical power substation is located across Campbell Lane to the
south.
As shown in Figure 2: Dublin TransitCenter LandUsePlan , the project site is located within the
91-acre district known as the Dublin Transit Center. The Transit Center project includes the
development of a high-density mixed-use, transit and pedestrian-oriented development
adjacent to the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. On-going development has included
removing most of the existing BART surface parking lots. Future construction of new land uses
includes up to two million square feet of office space, a maximum of 1,500 medium-high and
high-densityresidentialdwellings, and up to 70,000 square feet of ancillary retail commercial
uses. A five-story BART parking garage containing 1,700 spaces has been constructed adjacent
to Interstate 580 (I-580).
The proposed projectwould add a new 220-unit residentialdevelopment project with
associated streetscape improvements to the Transit Center. The project site is located five
minutes’ walk from BART, with the main entry and entry plaza located at the project site's
southeast corner to encourage direct pedestrian circulation to both public transit and the
nearby Campbell Green park.
As shown in Table 1: Dublin TransitCenter Development & Entitlements , the total number of
units constructed in Site A, including the proposed project, would be 384 units, 46 units less
than the 430 units allocated . The total number of units constructed within Sites A, B and C of
the Dublin Transit Center project area, including the proposed project, would be1,451 units, 49
units less than the total allocation of 1,500 units.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 207
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 3
Table1: DublinTransit CenterDevelopment & Entitlements
Site
Units
Constructed/Proposed Units Permitted 1 Difference
Site A 2 384 430 (46)
Site B 562 565 (3)
Site C 505 505 0
Total 1,451 1,500 (49)
Notes:
1. Per Dublin TransitCenter Stage 1 Development Plan, as amended.
2. Includes proposed project.
As shown in Table 1, the proposed project would not exceed the allocation of residential units
envisioned for Site A, nor the greaterDublin TransitCenter project, and is therefore consistent
with the development plans as analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Building Program and Design
As shown in Figure 3: Aerial Perspective, the proposed gross building area is 404,765 square
feet, with +/- 80% lot coverage. It includes 220 residential units and a two-level podium parking
garage. Residential units will beconstructed onfivefloorsover the garage. Residential units
will also be constructed on thenorth andeast sides of the first two levels, surrounding the
internal parking structure.
In addition to residential units and associated support areas, the project includes private
amenity spaces; including two building lobbies, two podium level roof courtyardsand a
swimming pool, and a level six private community room and outdoor roof terrace.
Figure4a, b, and c show the floor plans for levels 1, 3and6.
The parking garage will accommodate 331 cars. The parking ratio will equal or exceed the City
required 1.5 parking spaces per residential unit . Fifty spaces are designated as visitor spaces.
Six ADA compliant accessible car spaces and one ADA van space are located on the ground
floor.
The Dublin TransitCenter requires15% of the residential units be affordable units. The Camellia
Place apartment project on Site A-2 has been used to satisfy the very low and low portion of
the inclusionary housing requirement for the project. Ten percent (10%) of the units in the
proposed project are required to be set aside for moderate income households. The project
proposes to set aside 10% of the 220 units (22 units) for moderate income households. A
moderate-income household is defined by the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance as households
earning between 80% and120% of the area median income.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 208
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 4
As shown in Figure 2: Dublin Transit Center Land UsePlan, the project site is surrounded on
three sides by medium-high and high-density housing projects at a range of heights. These
include:
Site A-1 (Tribeca) – a three-story 52-unit medium-density residential project to the west
of Campbell Lane
Site A-2 (Camellia Place) – a four-story (three-storyoverone level of parking) 112-unit
high-densityresidential project to thenorth .
Site B-1 (Elan at Dublin Station) – a seven story (five-story over two levels of parking)
257- unit high-densityresidential project located east DeMarcusBoulevard.
Site B-2 (Eclipse at DublinStation) – a five story 305-unit high-density residential
project located on Dublin Boulevard.
Site C-1 (Avalon DublinStation) – a five-story 505-unit high-densityresidential project
located east DeMarcusBoulevard and south of CampbellGreen Park.
These residential buildings include a variety of façade materialsand colors, andinclude roof
forms ranging from shallow hipped to flat . The developments to thenorth and west of the
project site include stoops and direct street entries to some ground floor units.
The proposed project massing is consistent with the scale of the adjacent buildings, with the
tallest masses located at the east side of the project site opposite the adjacentbuildings along
the eastside of DeMarcus Boulevard (Elan and Avalon projects), and the lowest masses located
on the west side of theproject site opposite the lower height townhouses across Campbell
Lane (Tribeca). The proposed buildingheight range from three- to five-stories over a two-story
podium for a maximum of seven stories, and 81-feet in height.
The project's two story parking podium is wrapped on the north and east sides byresidential
units and other functional sp aces. To the south, the two parking levels are visually integrated
with three levels of residential units above. To the west, in response to the low-scale
residential buildings west across Campbell Lane, most of the residential mass above parking is
set back five feet. Along the project's north side, there are residential units atthe ground level
with unit entries and stoops to enhance the residential scale and character established by the
Camellia Place project across the street.
The project includes a variety of windows, exterior materials, andcolors. Facade treatments
include stucco, fiber cement and metal accentand infill panels, painted metal window
surrounds, limited areas of storefront glazing, and metal and translucent glass entry canopies .
Balconies and garage screening inserts include translucent perforated metal screening.
Simulatedrenderings of the proposed project are shown in Figure 5 from the four corners
surrounding the project site.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 209
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 5
Landscape Design
As shown in Figure 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan, a 20-foot building setback is required atthe
project's eastside along De Marcus Boulevard due to an existing stormwater easement. This
easement area is planted with a variety of taller flowering shrubs and succulents that delineate
the space while avoiding the use of fences or walls.
Colored concrete unit pavers and integral colored concrete connect the project site with the
rest of the Dublin Transit Center, while helping to define the main entries and pedestrian
promenade alongDeMarcusBoulevard.
Benches and raised planters are located throughout the landscape public spaces. Bio-retention
planters are used to define the private entries along the north side.
A three-foot landscape strip separates the garage from the sidewalk along Campbell Lane. The
landscape strip is planted with a variety of drought tolerant flowering shrubs and succulents
and a variety of aromaticplants. Flowering vines areproposedalong the garage facade.
Pedestrian and Vehicular Access
As shown in Figure 4a: Level 1Floor Plan, to facilitate pedestrian connectivity between the
project and nearbypedestrian destinations to the south and southwest (i.e. the East
Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and CampbellGreenPark), the primary entry is locatednear
the project's southeast corner atthe intersection of DeMarcusBoulevard and Campbell Lane.
The primary entry lobby is open to two floors and is setback to accommodate a pedestrian
plaza, which includes landscaped terraces that function as stepped planters and provide public
seating.
Asecond entry lobby is located mid-block on the north side of the building. Similar to the
primary entry, the building is setback creating asecond smallerpedestrian plaza with similar
landscaping.
Vehicular entry to the parking garage is from Campbell Lane on the project's south side, near
the primary entry plaza.
Project Engineering
Grading
The project site is essentially flat. Earthwork would include minimal grading and contouring to
accommodate drainage and elevationrequirements. Regrading would result in elevations
contours changing from 334 feet (above mean sea level) along the southernboundary, to 337
feet along the northern boundary. The project will require the cut of 600cubic yards of soil,
and the fill of 1,700 cubic yards of soil; for a net import of 1,100 cubic yards. See Figure 7:
Preliminary Grading Plan.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 210
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 6
The project site is located within a 500-year flood hazard area, as defined by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
Water and Sewer
Existing domestic water mains available for connection adjacent to the project site include a 12-
inchmain in DeMarcusBoulevard, and an eight-inch main on Campbell Lane. As part ofthe
proposed project, a new domestic water service lateral will connect to the eight-inch mainon
Campbell Lane at the northwest corner of the project site .
The proposed project will utilize an existing six-inch recycled water main on Campbell Lane.
The project would use recycled water for landscape irrigation.
A new proposed sanitary sewer lateralwould connect with the existing eight-inch sewer main
on Campbell Lane. See Figure 8: Preliminary Utility Plan.
Stormwater
The project site is currently paved with asphalt . Essentially all ofthe stormwater falling on to
the project sitesheet flows untreated into the City’s storm drain system.
As shown in Figure 9: Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan, stormwater from the roof (64,671
square feet) will be collected and passed through several flow-throughplanter boxes that
contain plants, treatment soil, and gravel. Once treated, this stormwater will flowinto the
existing 18-inch storm drainon Campbell Lane. Stormwater from the ground level runoff
19,870 square feet) will flowinto an underground stormwater treatment vault, and then into
the existing 18-inch storm drainon Campbell Lane.
Essentially, the volume of stormwaterflowing into the City’s storm drainage system will remain
unchanged; however, therate of flow will be slower by the use ofthe flow-throughplanter
boxes and the stormwater treatment vault.
Erosion Control
During construction, a construction fence and fiber roll will be installedaround the entire
perimeter of the project site. Inlet sedimentbarriers, per Citystandards, will be installed on all
existing storm drain structures until the project site is stabilized (see Figure 10: Preliminary
Erosion Control Plan).
Project Approvals
The proposed project includes a Stage 2 Planned Development Rezone, a Tentative Tract Map,
and Site Development Review Permit for the construction of a 220-unit residential building.
The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the
approvals required for the proposed project. City Council action will include adoption of the
Exemption for CEQA review and approval of the Stage 2 Planned Development Rezone, the
Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Review Permit.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 211
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 7
Environmental Analysis
Thediscussion below analyzes the potential environmental impacts ofthe proposed project per
the criteria as described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section
15162. For convenience, this analysis uses the Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines as a
framework for analysis. As such, the check-boxes in the column labeled “No Impact/NoNew
Impact” in the tables below indicates that no new environmental review is required because
none of the standards under Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section
15162 are met. There are no project changes, new information or change circumstances that
result in a new or substantially increase in severity of a significant impact from those identified
in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. No standards for requiring supplemental environmental
review under CEQA are met.
Aesthetics
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
1. AESTHETICS. Would theproject:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including butnot
limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views inthe
area?
Previous CEQA documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
Mitigation Measure4.1-1 for Impact4.4-1 encouraged the inclusion of breaks in building
designs and view corridors to provide views of Mt. Diablo to the north, considering the need
for noise control and the intentofthe Dublin Transit Center to provide a compact transit-
oriented design.
Mitigation Measure4.1-2 requires that a condition of Site Development Review for individual
projects, the City of Dublin shall requiresubmittal of lighting plans for all non -residential
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 212
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 8
projects along Iron Horse Parkway to ensure that all exterior light fixtures will either be
oriented downward or equipped with cut-off lenses to ensure that no spill-over of unwanted
light onto adjacent residential areas shall occur.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to applicable mitigation measures related to
aestheticsset forth inthe Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Scenic vistas, views
No NewImpact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR found that the greatest impact to scenic vistas
and views would on existingbackgroundviews to Mount Diabloand surrounding ridgelines.
Existing views of the project site are surrounded byresidential developments to the west,
north, and east. A BART surface parking lot and an electrical power substation is located across
Campbell Lane to the south.
Because obstruction of distant ridgeline views would besimilar to the view obstructions caused
by the surroundingdevelopments and analyzed in the EIR, there would be nonew or
substantially more severe significant impacts to scenic vistas andviews beyond what has been
analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review
are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
b) Scenic resources
No NewImpact. The project site is located north of the I- 580 freeway, which is a local scenic
highway, but is located on the northern portion of the Dublin Transit Center and is not highly
visible from the freewaydue to intervening buildings between the project site and the
Interstate 580 freeway.
A view corridor would be preserved along the western property line for views from the
Interstate 580 freeway to the northwest, as required byDublin TransitCenter EIR Mitigation
Measure 4.1-1.
No scenic resources exist on the project site, including but not limited to significant stands of
tree, rock outcroppings or bodies of water, so therewould be no impact with respect to
damage to scenic resources.
No public parks, playgrounds or other public gathering places exist on the project site so that
scenic vistas could be viewed.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to scenic res ources beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met . Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 213
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 9
c) Substantially degrade the visual character of the site or surrounding area
No New Impact. Simulated renderings of the proposed project areshown in Figure 5 from the
four corners surrounding the project site. The proposed land uses and their building heights
and scale, are consistent with those land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed building
heights are also consistent with height limits as identified in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
The proposed project includes constructing a multi-family residential development with
parking, landscaping and other improvements wherenone now exist.
Because the proposed project is consistent in building height, massing, and scale analyzed in
the EIR, therewould be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to the visual
character of the project site or surrounding area beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmentalreview is required.
d) Create a new source of substantial lightor glare
No NewImpact. Implementation ofthe proposed project result in a slight increase in daytime
and nighttimelight and glare. The main sources of daytime glare would be from sunlight
reflecting from structures with reflective surfaces, such as windows . The main sources of
nighttimelight and glare would be from additional lighting, including, butnot limited to,
internal and external building lights from proposed residential uses, street lighting, site lighting,
and lights associated with vehicular travel (i.e., vehicle headlights).
The Dublin TransitCenter EIR found that there is a potential for lighting from non -residential
uses to spill over into residential areas, creating a nuisance to Transit Center residents.
Mitigation Measure4.1-2requires that a conditionof Site Development Review for individual
projects, the City of Dublin shall requiresubmittal of lighting plans for allnon -residential
projects along Iron Horse Parkway to ensure that all exterior light fixtures will either be
oriented downward or equipped with cut-off lenses to ensure that no spill-over of unwanted
lightonto adjacent residential areas shall occur.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to light and glare beyond
what has been analyzed the Dublin Transit Center EIR, and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 214
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 10
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model
to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes inthe existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
of Farmland to non-agricultural use?
Previous CEQA documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
No significantimpacts to agricultural or forestry resources were identified in this document.
Project Impacts
a-c) Convert farmland or conflict with zoning
No NewImpact. No significantimpacts were identified with respect to agricultural resources in
previous CEQA documentlisted above. No new conditions havebeen identified in this
document with respect to conversion of prime farmland to a non•agricultural use. No new or
more severe significantimpacts would result than were analyzed in previous CEQA document
for this site.
The City of Dublin has previously zoned the project site for residential uses. No agricultural
zoning or Williamson Act contracts presently exist on the project site nor areany agricultural
operations on-going. Therefore, there would be no new or substantially more severe significant
impacts to farmland beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 215
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 11
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Air Quality
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
3. AIR QUALITY. Whereavailable, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollutioncontrol district may be reliedupon to make the following determinations .
Would the project:
a) Conflict withor obstruct implementation of the
applicable airquality plan?
b) Violate any airquality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozoneprecursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin TransitCenter EIR identified the following significant air quality impacts and
mitigation measures:
Mitigation Measure4.2-1 reduced impacts related to construction emission from
constructionequipment (see Impact 4.2-1) to a less-than-significant level. Specific items
listed in this measure required contractors to water construction area and stockpiled
material and other items based on BAAQMD standards.
Impact4.2-3 noted that project air emissions of ozone would exceed the BAAQMD
threshold of significance for regionalimpacts. No mitigation is available to reduce this
impact to a less-than significantlevel and this impact remainedsignificant and
unavoidable.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 216
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 12
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Consistent with air quality plans
No NewImpact. Approvaland implementation of the proposed project would represent fewer
dwelling units assumed as the basis for the regional Clean Air Plan. The proposed projectwould
not conflict with the Clean Air Plan adoptedby the Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BAAQMD), since the proposed amount of development has beenincluded in Dublin's planned
growth as part of the City’s General Plan, which is the basis ofthe Clean Air Plan.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to airquality plans
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
b, c) Violate air quality standards or cause cumulatively considerable airpollutants
No NewImpact. The Dublin TransitCenter EIR found that proposed development would result
in a significant and unavoidable emission of air emissions exceeding the applicable BAAQMD
standards. Mitigation Measure4.2-1 was recommended to reduce construction impacts to a
less than significantlevel. Theproposed project is a high-densitymixed-use, transit and
pedestrian-oriented development. These characteristics provide for much higher internal and
non-autotravel mode percentages compared to suburban residential or commercial
development.
With adherence to previous mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to air quality standards or
cause cumulatively considerable air pollutants beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmentalreview is required.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors
No NewImpact. The health risk of dieselexhaust from roadway traffic was known in 2002
although it was not analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR. The 1999 BAAQMD CBQA
Guidelines (1999 Guidelines) identified dieselengine particulate matter as a toxic air
contaminant based on California Air Resources Board (CARB) findings. There were several
studies published prior to 2002 that demonstrated potential health impacts to residences living
close to freeways. (See, studies cited in CARB's 2005 “Air Quality and LandUse Handbook".)
The 1999 Guidelinesencourage Lead Agencies to address impacts to sensitive receptors (such as
residences) to exposure of high levels of dieselexhaust from sources such as a high-volume
freeway (1999 BAAQMD CBQA Guidelines, p. 47).
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 217
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 13
BAAQMD recommends that these impacts should be analyzed based on best available
information. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines in effect in 2002 also listed exposure of
sensitive receptors to substantial levels of toxicair contaminants as a potentially significant
impact. This significance threshold was included in the Dublin Transit Center EIR (p. 48). Since
potential health impacts due to exposure to diesel exhaust was known or could have been
known in 2002, the risks of toxic air contaminants from diesel exhaust is not new information
that requires additional analysis under CEQA.
Similarly, recently updated information from CARB and BAAQMD onhealth impacts of diesel
exhaust and the BAAQMD CEQA significan ce standards do not trigger the requirement for
supplemental environmentalreviewunder CEQA section 21166. These new standards do not
identify Toxic Air Contaminants as a "new significant impact." This adverse health impact was
already known and recent new information only refined the type and level of analysis.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to sensitive receptors
from pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors beyond what has been analyzed in
the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Biological Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
throughhabitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive naturalcommunity identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 218
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 14
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
Act (including, butnot limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species orwith
established nativeresident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservationpolicy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adoptedHabitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
This Dublin Transit Center EIR identified the following significantbiologicalimpacts.
Impact 4.3-1 noted an impact with loss of Congdon's spikeweed and potentially four
other special-status plants on the project site. This impact was reduced to a less• than-
significantlevel by adherence to Mitigation Measure 4.3-1 that requires project
Applicants to avoid populations of spikeweed or, if not feasible, an off-site mitigation
program is to becreated. Measures to avoid, preserve or mitigate other special-status
plants identified and required to beimplemented.
Impact4.3-2 found a significant impact with respect to California red-legged frogs (CRLF)
or their habitat. This impact was reduced to a less-than-significant level through
adherence to Mitigation Measure 4.3-2. This mitigation measure required a CRLF
preconstruction survey consultation with the USFWS. If populations of CRLF are
identified appropriate protection plans were required to be prepared with necessary
permits from appropriateregulatory agencies.
Impact4.3-3 noted an impact regarding burrowing owls. Adherence to Mitigation
Measure 4.3-3 reduced this impact to a less-than-significant levelby requiring a
preconstruction survey on a developmentsite no more than 30 days prior to grading. If
owls are found, a biologist shall establish an exclusion zone around occupied burrow
until it is confirmed thatthe burrow is unoccupied.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 219
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 15
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Substantial adverse effect on candidate, sensitive, or special status species
No New Impact. No changes have occurred to the project site since certification of the Dublin
TransitCenter in 2002. Mitigation measures contained in the Dublin Transit Center EIR will
continue to apply to the project site.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to candidate, sensitive, or
special status species beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
b, c) Substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat , natural community, or wetlands
No NewImpact. As described in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR, there are no wetlands or
riparian features on or adjacent to the project site. There wouldtherefore be no impacts to
wetlands or riparian habitats. Since there are no streams on the project site, the project site is
not subject to the City's StreamPreservation Plan.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to riparian habitat,
natural community or wetlands beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR
and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
d) Interfere or impede the movement of migratory fish orwildlife
No NewImpact. The project site is located in a substantiallyurbanized area and surrounded by
pavedroads or parcels of land that have beendeveloped that would precludesignificant
wildlife migration. There are no creeks or streams on the project site that would allow for
migration of fish species. The Dublin TransitCenter EIR identifiedthis impact as less than
significant (Impact 4.3-4).
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to migratory fish or
wildlife beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA
standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is
required.
e) Conflict with local policies or ordinance include tree preservation or any adopted habitat
conservation or naturalcommunity conservation plans.
No NewImpact. No trees arepresent on the project site, and there are no impacts regarding
local tree preservation ordinances or policies.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 220
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 16
The project site lies within the Eastern Alameda CountyConservation Strategy (EACCS) planning
area. The City of Dublin utilizes the Conservation Strategy as guidance for environmental
permitting for public projects, and private development projects are encouraged to use the
EACCS as a resource as well. The ConservationStrategy embodies a regional approach to
permitting and mitigation for wildlife habitat impacts associated with land development,
infrastructure, and other activities. The ConservationStrategy is neither a Habitat Conservation
Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan, but is a documentintended to provide
guidance during the project planning and permitting process to ensure that impacts are offset
in a biologically effective manner.
Because no HCP or NCCP was identifiedin theprior EIRs and none applies at present, there
would be no new or significantly more severe impacts to tree preservation or any adopted
habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans beyond what has been analyzed
in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Cultural Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adversechange in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adversechange in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to section 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, includingthose interred
outside of dedicatedcemeteries?
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 221
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 17
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
Impact4.4-1contained in the Dublin Transit Center EIR found a potentially significant impact
with respect to historical, archeologicaland Native American resources on the project site. This
impact was reduced by Mitigation Measure4.4-1 that required, if archeological, archeological
or Native American artifacts areencountered during construction, work on the project shall
cease until compliance with CEQA GuidelinesSection 15064.5 is demonstrated. Work on the
project may commence under the guidance of an approved resource protection plan . The
County Coroner is to be contacted if human remains are uncovered.
The proposed project will be required to adhere tothis applicable mitigation measure as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Historic resources
No NewImpact. The site is vacant andcontains no built structures. As a result, there would be
no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to historic resources beyond what has
been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental
review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
b, c) Archaeological or paleontological resources
No New Impact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR identified a remote but potentially significant
possibility that constructionactivities, including site grading, trenching andexcavation, may
uncoversignificant archeological and/or paleontological resources ondevelopment sites. None
of these pre-historic sites were identified by the Dublin Transit Center EIR within or near the
project site.
The Dublin TransitCenter EIR noted a potentially significant cultural resource impact regarding
unidentified historic, archeological and Native American resources and the project remains
subject to Mitigation Measure 4.4-1.
The Dublin TransitCenter EIR identified no known cultural resources for the project site.
However, mitigation for potential but currently unidentified resources should they be
discovered duringconstruction is provided in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. The project
remainssubject to these prior adoptedmitigations.
With adherence to previous mitigation measures and applicable regulatoryrequirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to archaeological or
paleontological resources beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and
no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmentalreview is required.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 222
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 18
d) Human remains
No New Impact. The project is subject to existing cultural resource mitigation measures
contained in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR regarding potential impacts to human remains.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements , there
would be no new or more severe significant impacts to cultural impacts beyondthose
previously analyzed inthe Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Geology and Soils
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault?
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion orthe loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 223
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 19
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
1994), creatingsubstantial risks to life or property?
e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste
water disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of waste water?
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin TransitCenter EIR identified two mitigation measures for the project.
Mitigation Measure4.5-2 reduced the impact related to seismic hazards (Impact 4.5-2)
to a less-than-significant level. This measure requiredcompletion of a site-specific
geotechnical investigation prior to development of individualprojects. Future projects
are required to beconsistent with current building codes.
Mitigation Measure4.5-3 reduced the impact related to expansive soils to a less• than-
significantlevel (Impact 4.5-3). This measure required site-specific geotechnical reports
to address expansive soils and provide appropriate engineeringand construction
techniques to reduce damage from expansive soils.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Seismic hazards
No New Impact. During a major earthquake on a segment of one of the nearby faults,
moderate to strong ground shakingcan be expected to occur at the project site. Strong shaking
during an earthquake could resultin ground failure such as that associated with soil
liquefaction and differential compaction. Mitigation Measure 4.5-2 will requirecompletion of a
site-specific geotechnical investigation prior to development of individualprojects.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to seismic hazards beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 224
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 20
b) Erosion/topsoil loss
No New Impact. Construction of the proposed project improvements on the project site would
slightly modify the existing ground surface and alter patterns of surface runoff and infiltration
and could result in a short-term increase in erosion and sedimentation caused by grading
activities. The project will also be required to implement the erosion controls from the RWQCB
measures as enforced by the City of Dublin. The City's requirement to implement site-specific
erosion and other controls will reduceerosion fromthe project site to a less-than-specific level.
With adherence to applicable regulatoryrequirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significantimpacts to erosion/topsoil loss beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
c-d) Soil stability
No New Impact. Consistent with Dublin TransitCenter EIR Mitigations Measures 4.5-2and 4.5-
3, and standard City development procedures, the report contains methods to minimize
impacts from liquefaction and other soil hazards for future site improvements on the project
site.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or more severe significant impacts related to lateral spreading, liquefaction
and other soil hazards beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
e) Soil capability to support waste water disposal, including septic
No NewImpact. As assumed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR, proposed residences on the
project site would be connected to e x i s t i n g sanitary sewers on the adjacentroadways.
Because the project site would be connected to existing sanitary sewers, there would beno
new or substantially more severe significant impacts to soil capability to support waste water
disposal, including septic beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and
no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 225
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 21
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
a) Generategreenhouse gas emission s, either directly or
indirectly, that may havea significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with applicable plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
Since certification of the Dublin Transit Center EIR in 2002, the issue of the contribution of
greenhouse gasses to climate change has become a moreprominent issue of concern as
evidenced by passage of AB 32 in 2006.
Because theseprevious EIRs have been certified, the determination of whether greenhouse
gasses and climate change needs to be analyzed for this proposed project is governed by the
law on supplemental or subsequent EIRs (Public Resources Code section21166 and CEQA
Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). Greenhouse gas and climate change is not required to
be analyzed under those standards unless it constitutes "new information of substantial
importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous
EIRs were certified as complete” (CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15162 (a) (3)).
Greenhouse gas and climate change impacts were not analyzed in the prior EIRs; however,
these impactsare not new information that was not known or could not have been known at
thetime these previous EIRs were certified. The issue of climate change and greenhouse gasses
was widely known prior to the certification of these EIRs. The United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change was established in 1992. The regulation of greenhouse gas
emissions to reduce climate change impacts was extensively debated and analyzed throughout
the early 1990s. The studies and analyses of this issue resulted in the adoption of the Kyoto
Protocol in 1997.
In the earlyand mid-2000s, GHGs and climate change were extensively discussed and analyzed
in California. In 2000, SB 1771 established the California Climate Action Registry for the
recordation of greenhouse gas emissions to provide information about potential environmental
impacts. Therefore, the impact of greenhouse gases onclimate change was known at thetime
of the certification of the Dublin Transit Center EIR in 2002. Under CEQA standards, it is not
new information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration. No
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 226
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 22
supplemental environmental analysis ofthe project's impacts on this issue is requiredunder
CEQA.
Even if the impact of the project's greenhouse gas emissionswas required to be considered
under CEQA, it would be less than significant since the project is consistent with the City's
Climate Action Plan. In October 2010, the City adopted a Climate Action Plan in accordance with
CEQA requirements and BAAQMD's CEQA Guidance. The City’s Climate Action Plan was
subsequently updated in October 2013. The GHG emissions from the Dublin Transit Center
project were included in the Climate Action Plan. The City adopted a Negative Declaration for
the Climate Action Plan finding the impacts ofthe Climate Action Plan would be less than
significant. The Climate Action Plan serves as the City's qualified GHG Reduction Plan and
programmatic tiering document for the purposes of CEQA for analysis of impacts of greenhouse
gas emissions and climate change.
The City has determined that the reduction target under the Climate Action Plan will reduce the
impact from activities under the Climate Action Plan to less than significant under CEQA (i.e.,
the project willnot make a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significantcumulative
impact). Therefore, CEQA allows the Climate Action Plan to be used for the cumulative impact
analysis for future projects and development in the City covered by the Climate Action Plan. As
such, it satisfies CEQA review requirements for the project.
Since the project emissions were included in the Climate Action Plan and theproject is
consistent with the applicableemission reduction measures identifiedin the Specific Plan and
included in the Climate Action Plan, the project would be considered to have a less than
significant impact (i.e. less than cumulatively considerable contribution to significant
cumulative impact) due to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change consistent with Public
Resources Code 21083.3, CEQA Guidelines Sections 15183.5, 15064 and 15130and BAAQMD
adopted CEQA Guidelines and GHG Significance Thresholds. In fact, the project is exactly the
type of project which reduces greenhouse gas emissions- an infill, transit-oriented, high-density
residential project as part of an overall mixed use development.
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures fromthe Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
a, b) Generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or conflict with GHG plans or regulations
As discussed above, no additional environmental analysisis required under CEQA Section 21166
and CEQA Guidelines section 15162.
Source(s)
None.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 227
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 23
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public orthe
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Createa significant hazard to the public orthe
environment through reasonablyforeseeable upsetand
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardousemissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiledpursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public orthe
environment?
e) Fora project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f) Fora project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlandsare adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 228
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 24
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin TransitCenter EIR identified two mitigation measures related to hazards and
hazardous materials.
Mitigation Measure4.6-1 reduced the impactrelated to release of hazardous materials
on the project siteremaining from past military uses (Impact 4.1-1) to a less• than-
significant level. This measure requiredcompletion of additional environmental analysis
Phase I and/or Phase II reports) and completion of any clean-up of recognized
hazardous materials on the project site.
Mitigation Measure4.6-2 reduced the impact related to risk of upset from a nearby
petroleum pipeline adjacent to the Iron Horse Trail to a less-than• significantlevel
Impact 4.6-2). This measure required future developers on Sites A and C within the
Dublin TransitCenter to identify the presence of the petroleum pipeline to avoid
damage byconstruction equipment . Future residences on Sites A and C are also
required to maintain a minimum 50-foot setback from the pipeline to the nearest
habitable structure.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials
No NewImpact. There would be no impact to the transport, use or disposal of hazardous
materials, since the proposed project involves construction of a residential development on the
project site. Proposed land uses on the project site would not use, store ortransport significant
quantities of hazardous materials. To the extent there are potentially hazardous materials used
in construction, the impacts would be less than significant due to compliance with regulatory
requirements.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to transport, use or
disposal of hazardous materialsbeyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR
and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
b) Potential release of hazardous materials into the environment
No NewImpact. The Phase I ESA report prepared for the project prepared pursuant to Dublin
Transit Center EIR Mitigation Measure4.6-1 did not identify any significant hazards to the
public or the environment as a result of release of hazardous materials . Adherence to
Mitigation Measures 4.6-1 and 4.6-2 contained in the Dublin Transit Center EIR will ensure that
release of hazardous materials would be less than significant.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 229
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 25
Pursuant to the Dublin TransitCenter EIR Mitigation Measure 4.6-2, development on the
project site is required to maintain a minimum 50-foot wide structural setback from the Kinder•
Morgan oil pipeline that runsadjacent to the Iron Horse Trail. This requirement has been met
as shownon Figure 2: ProjectAerial Diagram.
The project includes residentialdevelopment as assumed in the Transit Center EIR and through
the Phase I ESA, project design and conditions of approval, has complied or will comply with the
adopted mitigation measures.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to the potential release of
hazardous materialsbeyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
c) Emit hazardous materials within one-quartermile of an existing or proposed school
No New Impact. No schools exist or are planned within one quartermile of the project area .
Because no schools exist or areplanned within one quartermile ofthe project area, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to emitting hazardous
materials within an existing or proposed school beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmentalreview is required.
d) Listed as a hazardous materials site
No NewImpact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR examined the potential for hazardous materials
extensivelyand the project site is not listed on the State of California Department of Toxic
Substances Control as an identified hazardous site as of February 26, 2012 (last update).
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to listed hazardous
materials sites beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other
CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview
is required.
e-f) Proximity to a public or private airport
No New Impact. The project site lies north of the Airport Influence Area of Livermore Municipal
Airport and is not included in the Airport Influence Area. Because the project site is not within
proximity to a public or private airport, there would be no new or substantially more severe
significantimpacts to public or privateairports beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no
further environmentalreview is required.
g) Impair implementation of an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan
No New Impact. The proposed project would include the construction of a residential project
on private land. No emergency evacuation plan would be affected since no roadways would be
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 230
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 26
blocked. Therefore, therewould be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
h) Expose people or structures to wildland fires
No NewImpact. The project site is in an urbanized area of Eastern Dublin andcontains no
flammable structures or vegetation, as identified in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. Properties
east, west, and north aredevelopedand there is no possible exposure from wildland fires. As a
result, there would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to exposing
people or structures to wildland fires beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit
Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no
further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Livermore Municipal Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, 2012.
Hydrologyand Water Quality
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any waterquality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local ground water table level (for example, the
production rate of pre-existin g nearby wells would drop
to a level which would not support existing land uses or
planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantialerosion or siltationon- or off-site.
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 231
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 27
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off-site.
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed
the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwisesubstantially degrade waterquality?
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood-hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or otherflood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood -hazard area structures
which would imped e or redirectflood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of alevee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The following impacts and mitigation measures related to hydrologyand waterquality were
identifiedinthis EIR.
Mitigation Measure4.7-1 reduced the impactrelated to non-point source pollution
Impact4.7-3) to a less-than-significantlevel. This measure required future individual
site developers to prepare and implement erosion control plans. If needed, additional
provisions may be required for the proper handling and disposal of hazardous materials .
Associated Mitigation Measure 4.7-2 required each developer to prepareand
implement a StormwaterPollution Prevention Plan to Regional Water Board standards.
Mitigation Measure4.7-3 reduced the construction impactrelated to short-term
increases of soil erosion from wind and water (Impact 4.7-4) to a less-than• significant
level. This mitigation required individual project Applicants to prepare and implement
erosion control plans for the project construction period, consistent with Regional
Water Boardstandards. Measures included but were not limited to revegetation of
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 232
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 28
graded areas, protection of stockpiled material, constructingsediment ponds and
related items.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Violate waterquality or waste discharge requirements
No New Impact. Approval and construction of the proposed development project would alter
impervious surfaces to the undeveloped site that would decrease the net amount of
stormwater runoff and potentially degrade water quality. TheCity of Dublin requires new
development proposals to adhere to the most recent surface water quality standards adopted
by the RWQCB. The Municipal Regional Permit Provision C.3.g requires that stormwater
discharges not cause and increase in erosion potential ofthe receiving stream over the existing
condition.
For this project, the project is proposing to install flow-through planter boxes that contain
plants, treatment soil and gravel. The planters are located in the open courtyard areas and the
perimeter areas at the building. Once treated, this stormwater will flow intothe existing 18-
inch storm drainon Campbell Lane. Stormwater from the ground level runoff willflow into an
underground stormwater treatment vault, and then into the existing 18-inch storm drain on
Campbell Lane. These stormwater systems, as required by the RWQCB, will help to ensure that
water quality andwaste discharge standards are met .
With adherence to applicable mitigation measures and regulatoryrequirements, there would
be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to water quality or waste discharge
requirements beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other
CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview
is required.
b) Substantially deplete or interfere with groundwater supplies
No New Impact.
The existing site provide minimal groundwater recharge. Although the currently vacant site
would be converted to an urban use, a small portion of the project site would remain as open
space, which would allow some recharge ofthe underground aquifer.
The proposed water source for this projectwouldrely on surface water supplies from the
Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) and not local groundwater supplies. The project is
required to support Zone 7’s groundwater recharge program. Zone 7’s policy is to only pump
groundwater it artificially recharges using its imported surface water or locally-stored runoff
from Arroyo del Valley. Compliance with this would maintaingroundwater at a no net loss for
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 233
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 29
the Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin. As a result, the proposed project would not result in
a net increase in groundwaterextraction from Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significantimpacts to groundwater supplies beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
c) Substantially alter existing drainage patternsre: erosion/siltation
No New Impact. Newimpervious surfaces would beconstructed on the project site to
accommodate new dwellings, roadways, driveways andsimilar surfaces, consistent with the
development assumptions in theprior EIRs.
The project Applicant is subject to comply with the Dublin TransitCenter EIR Mitigation
Measure 4.7-3, which requires project Applicants to implement an erosion control plan to
minimize polluted runoff reduced impacts related to changed drainage patterns to a less -than-
significant level (see Figure 10: Preliminary Erosion Control Plan).
With adherence to required mitigation measures andapplicable regulatoryrequirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to erosion/siltation beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
d) Substantially alter existing drainage patternsre: flooding
No NewImpact. Construction ofthe project would not significantly change drainage patterns
andproposed storm drain facilities will beadequately sized for project runoff (see item "e"
below).
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to flooding beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
e) Runoff exceed drainagecapacity, or add pollution
No New Impact. The amount of stormwaterflowing into the City’s storm drainage system will
remain unchanged; however, the rate of flow will be slower using flow-throughplanter boxes
and the stormwater treatment vault.
Furthermore, the proposed project is subject to adopted Dublin TransitCenter EIR Mitigation
Measure 4.7-3. This mitigation measure requires individual project Applicants to prepare and
implement erosion control plans. In compliance with existing EIR mitigation measures, the
project Applicant proposes the construction of both bio-retention flow-throughplanter boxes
and a stormwater treatment vault to comply with both City requirements andprevious EIR
mitigation measures. The proposed storm drain facilities are adequately sized for project
runoff and designed to filter out pollutants. In addition, the project Applicant proposes to
install full trash capture devices to meet the MRP Trash Reduction requirements.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 234
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 30
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to drainage capacity, or
additional pollution beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
g, h, i) 100-year flood hazard, dam/levee failure
No NewImpact. The project site is located within a 500-year flood hazard area, but outside of
a 100-year flood hazardarea.
Compliance with the City of Dublin's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan will ensure
that hazards to visitors andresidents on the project site as a result of dam failure will be
reduced to a less-than• significantlevel byproviding anemergency evacuation plan in the event
of a dam failure.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significantimpacts to 100-year flood hazard and to dam or levee failure beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow
No NewImpact. The site is not locatednear a major body of water that could result in a seiche.
The risk of potential mudflow isconsidered low since no historic landslides or mudflows have
been identified on the project site. There would be no impact with implementation of the
proposed project.
Since the project site and surrounding properties are relatively flat (less than 2 percent cross
slope), no impacts are anticipated with respect to landslide hazard.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA
standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is
required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Land Use and Planning
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 235
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 31
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
including, butnot limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
c) Conflict with anyapplicable Habitat Conservation Plan or
Natural Community Conservation Plan?
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures fromthe Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Physically divide anestablished community
No NewImpact. The project site is located inthe Eastern Dublin planning area . The project
reflects the type and location of development assumed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR. As
noted in the land use discussion in the Dublin Transit Center EIR (see, e.g., Impact 4.8-2), the
project site is consistent with existing land uses and would not divide anestablished
community.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to anestablished
community beyond what has been analyzed inthe Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA
standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is
required.
b) Conflict with general plan
No New Impact. The proposed project would be consistent with environmental goals and
policies contained in the City’s General Plan.
As shown in Table 1: Dublin Transit Center Development & Entitlements (in the Project
Description), the total number of units constructed in Site A, including the proposed project,
would be 384 units, 46 units less than total 430 units allocated . The total number of units
constructed within Site A, B and C of the Dublin Transit Center project area, including the
proposed project, would be1,451 units, 49 units less than the total allocation of 1,500 units .
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 236
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 32
The proposed project would not exceed the allocation of residential units envisioned for Site A,
nor the greaterDublin Transit Center project, and is therefore consistent with the development
plans as analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts due to conflict with
environmental protection policies in the General Plan beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation
plan
No New Impact. The project site lies within the Eastern AlamedaCountyConservationStrategy
EACCS) planning area. The City of Dublin utilizes the Conservation Strategy as guidance for
environmental permitting for public projects, and private developmentprojects are encouraged
to use the EACCS as a resource as well. The ConservationStrategy embodies a regional
approach to permitting and mitigation for wildlife habitat impacts associated with land
development, infrastructure, and other activities. The Conservation Strategy is neither a
Habitat Conservation Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), but is a
documentintended to provide guidance during the project planning and permitting process to
ensure that impacts are offsetin a biologically effectivemanner.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to an HCP or NCCP
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Mineral Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resourcerecovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 237
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 33
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures from the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
a-b) Loss of known or identified mineral resource
No New Impact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR indicated that significant deposits of minerals do
not exist on the project site, so there would be nonew or substantially more severe significant
impacts to mineral resources that would occur beyond what has been previously analyzed in the
Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplementa l review are met.
Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Noise
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
12. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noiselevels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels?
c) Substantial permanent increase in ambient noiselevels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noiselevels in the project vicinity abovelevels existing
without the project?
e) Fora project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose peopleresiding or working inthe project
area to excessive noise levels?
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 238
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 34
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
f) For a project withinthe vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noiselevels?
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin TransitCenter EIR identified the following impacts and mitigation measures.
Mitigation Measure4.9-1 reduced short-term construction noise (Impact 4.9-1) to a
less-than-significant level by requiring individual project Applicants to prepare
Construction Noise Management Plans and to have theseapproved by the Dublin
CommunityDevelopment and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of a
grading permit. Each plan shall identify specificnoise reduction measures, including
listing of construction hours, use of mufflers on construction equipment, on-site speed
limits for construction equipment and similar measures.
Mitigation Measure4.9-2 reduced impacts related to permanent noise on residential
uses (Impact 4.9-2) to a less-than-significantlevel by requiringindividual residential
developers to prepare acoustic reports that lists specific measures to betaken to reduce
noise to City exposure limits, including but not limited to window glazing, ventilation
systems and noise barriers.
Mitigation Measure4.9-3 reducedimpacts related to helicopter overflights from Camp
Parks RFTA (Impact 4.9-3) to a less-than-significant level by requiring notification of such
overflights to future residents.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Exposure to or generate noise exceeding standards
No NewImpact. As analyzed in previous EIR, development of proposed residential land uses on
the project site would increase noise on the project site and future residences would be sub ject
to traffic noise from vehicles surrounding roadway, in particular Dublin Boulevard to the north
and Interstate 580 to the south.
Consistent with the Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation Measure 4.9 -2, the Applicant is
required to complete a site-specificacoustic report prior to issuance of a building permit. The
report will include anyspecific measures that are necessary to reduce noise to Citystandards.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 239
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 35
Adherence to these previous noise mitigation measures, noise standards in the Dublin General
Plan, and the City Noise Ordinance, will reduce noise to a less-than-significantlevel. No new or
more significant noise impacts have been identified beyond what has been previously analyzed.
The Dublin TransitCenter EIR found exposure of proposed residentialdevelopment to noise
from future military training activities at Camp Parks RFTA to be less than significant after
mitigation to the Transit Center project area. The mitigation requires providing written notice
to future residents will be implemented through conditions of approval on the project.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to exposure from noise
exceeding standards beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
b) Exposure to ground borne vibration or ground borne noise
No New Impact. The proposed project would not include construction or operational elements
that would result in significant groundborne vibration levels to nearbyresidents.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to ground borne
vibration or ground borne noise beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter
EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
c) Permanently increasing ambient noise levels
No NewImpact. The Dublin TransitCenter EIR found that future exposure of housing nearest to
Dublin Boulevard and I-580 would be subject to potentially significant noise levels. Future traffic
generated by the proposed project would contribute to future exposure of housing to future
roadway noise. However, the impacts of the proposed project with respect to increases in
permanent noise levels are within the scope of the impacts associated with the project analyzed
in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. The type and intensity of development proposed as part of the
proposed project, and the noise generated and associated impacts on residential uses, have
been identified and analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR. The project Applicant would be
required to comply with Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation Measure4.9 -2, requiringindividual
residential developers to prepare acoustic reports to reduce noise to City exposure limits.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to permanently increasing
ambient noise levels beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 240
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 36
d) Substantial temporary noise increase
No New Impact. Implementation of the proposed project wouldresult in short-term
construction noise. The project Applicant would be required to comply with the Dublin Transit
Center EIR Mitigation Measure 4.9-1, requiringindividual project Applicants to prepare
Construction Noise Management Plans that identify specific construction noise reduction
measures to minimize noise to existingand future housing, as well as adhere to construction
hour limitations.
With adherence to required mitigation measures andapplicable regulatoryrequirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts associated with a substantial
temporary noise increase beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and
no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
e, f) Excessive noise level near a public or private airport
No New Impact. Based on Exhibit 3-2contained in the Livermore Municipal Airport Land Use
Compatibility Plan (2012), the project site lies north of the noise compatibility zone for this
airport. The project site would therefore not be subjected to substantial aircraft noise from
this airport. However, the Dublin Transit Center EIR notes that the project site couldbe subject
to potential noise from helicopter operations from Camp Parks RFTA and the project
Applicant's adherence to TransitCenter EIR Mitigation Measure 4.9-3 by requiring notification
of such overflights to future residents.
With adherence to required mitigation measures andapplicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts from aviation noise beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Livermore Municipal Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, 2012.
Population and Housing
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in anarea, either
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 241
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 37
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures fromthe Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Population growth
No NewImpact. Approval of the proposed project would not inducesubstantial additional
population growthinthe Eastern Dublin area, since development on the affected properties
has long beenenvisioned in the Dublin General Plan and the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1
Zoning, as described inthe Dublin TransitCenter EIR. Approval ofthe proposed projectwould
result in fewer dwellingsbeing constructed thancurrently approved in the Dublin Transit Center
project area for Sites A, B and C (1,451 units, 49 units less than the total allocation of 1,500
units).
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to population growth
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
b-c) Housing and resident displacement
No New Impact. Since theproject site is vacant, no housing units or people would be displaced
should the project be approved and implemented. No houses were on the project site when
the prior EIRs were certified.
Because the project site is vacant, there would be nonew or substantially more severe
significant impacts to housing displacementbeyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmentalreview is required.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 242
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 38
Source(s)
City of Dublin Web site. Accessed September 12, 2017. Available at
http://www.ci.dublin.ca.us/238/Community-and-Economic-Profile
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Public Services
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adversephysical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or need for new or physical altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, orother performance objectives for any of
the public services:
a) Fire protection ?
b) Police protection ?
c) Schools?
d) Parks?
e) Otherpublic facilities?
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures fromthe Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Fire
No NewImpact. Construction of the proposed projectwould increase demand for fire and
emergency services by increasing the amount of permanentdaytime population on the project
site. Features will be incorporated into the project as part of existing City ordinances and
developmentrequirements, which assist in reducingimpacts. These featuresinclude
installation of on-site fire protection measures such as fire sprinklers, installation of new fire
hydrants that meet the minimum fire flow requirements contained in the Uniform Building
Code and Uniform Fire Code.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 243
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 39
As part of the City’s Development Fee Program, the project Applicant will be required to payan
impact fee forfire facilities to serve new development in the City. This impactfee relates to
funding new fire facilities in Eastern Dublin, ensuring adequate water supplies and pressure for
fire suppression, and minimizing wildland fire hazards.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be nonew or substantially
more severe significant impacts to fire services beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmentalreview is required.
b) Police
No New Impact. Incremental increases in the demand for police service could be expected
should the project be approved and constructed . This increase in calls for service would be off-
set through adherence to City of Dublin safety requirements fromthe Dublin Police Services,
including the Non-ResidentialSecurity Ordinance.
With adherence to applicable regulatoryrequirements, there would be nonew or substantially
more severe significantimpacts to police services beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmentalreview is required.
c) Schools
No New Impact. No new impacts to school service are anticipated since payment of mandated
statutory impact fees at the time of issuance of building permits will provide mitigation of
educational impacts of the proposed project pursuant to State law. The currently proposed
project would result in fewer school• aged children to be accommodated in DUSD school
facilitiesthan was assumed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR (1,451 units, 49 units less than the
total allocation of 1,500 units) and mitigation of impacts is limited by statute to payment of
impact fees to the School District by the project Applicant.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significantimpacts to schools beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit
Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no
further environmental review is required.
d, e) Other publicfacilities
No New Impact. Approval and construction of theproject would incrementally increase the
long-term maintenance demand for roadsand other publicfacilities . However, such additional
maintenance demands will be off-set by additional City fees and property tax revenues accruing
to the City of Dublin and therefore impacts would be less-than-significant.
With adherence to applicable regulatoryrequirements, including payment of fees, there would
be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to other publicfacilities beyond
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 244
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 40
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. 2017. Fire Services and Prevention. Accessed September 13, 2017. Available at
http://dublinca.gov/22/Fire-Services-Prevention.
City of Dublin. 2017. Police Services. Accessed September 13, 2017. Available at
http://www.ci.dublin.ca.us/91/Police-Services.
City of Dublin. 2017. Schools. Accessed September 13, 2017. Available at
http://www.dublin.ca.gov/401/Schools.
City of Dublin. 2017. Parks and Community Services. Accessed September 13, 2017. Available
at http://www.dublin.ca.gov/90/Parks-Community-Services.
City of Dublin. 2017. Fire Facilities Impact Fee Study Update. Accessed October23, 2017.
Available at http://dublinca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/16547.
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Recreation
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreationalfacilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Include recreationalfacilities or require the construction
or expansion of recreationalfacilitieswhich might have
an adverse physical effecton the environment?
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
Impacts to parks and recreationalfacilities were found to be less• than-significant and no
mitigation measures were contained in this EIR.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 245
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 41
Project Impacts
a, b) Increase the use of existing recreation facilities causing deterioration or require new
recreation facilities
No New Impact. As envisioned in the Dublin Transit Center EIR for the project site, approval
and construction of the proposed project would increase the use of nearby City or regional
recreationalfacilities, since it would include increasing the on -site permanent population
currently on the project site. However, there would be fewer residents at build-out as
previously envisioned in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. Consistent with CityZoning
requirements, the Applicant proposes to provide private recreation amenities on the project
site and will be required to payCity of DublinCommunity Facility Fees to assist in providing off-
site parks.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significantimpacts to parks beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit
Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no
further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Transportation/Traffic
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Conflict with anapplicable plan, ordinance, or policy
establishing measures of effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation system taking into
account all modes of transportation including mass
transit and non-motorized travel and relevant
components of the circulation system, including butnot
limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways,
pedestrianand bicycle paths, and mass transit?
b) Conflict with anapplicablecongestion management
program, including, butnot limited to level of service
standardsand travel demand measures, or other
standardsestablished by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 246
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 42
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
c) Result in achange in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increasehazards due to a design feature
for example, sharp curves or dangerous intersections)
or incompatible uses (for example, farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities,
or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such
facilities?
Previous CEQA Documents
Transit Center EIR
The Dublin TransitCenter EIR identified the following significantsupplementalimpacts and
mitigation measures related to traffic and transportation:
Mitigation Measure4.11-1 required roadway improvements for the Scarlett Drive
extension, the Dublin Boulevard / Dougherty Road intersection and the Hacienda
Drive/Interstate 580 westbound off-ramp to reduce impacts related to project traffic on
external roadwayintersections to a less-than-significantlevel (Impact 4.11-1).
Mitigation Measure4.11-2 reduced the impact of parking on the TransitCenter site with
respect to future BART parking (Impact 4.11-4). This measure required the City to post
all on-street parking withinthe TransitCenter for limited parkinghours (2-4hours).
Individualdevelopmentprojects are to be designed to limit BART parking.
Mitigation Measure4.11-3 partially butnot fully reducedimpacts related to cumulative
traffic (Impact 4.11-5). This mitigation measure requiredadditional roadway
improvements to the Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection which was found
to be infeasible.
Mitigation Measure4.11-4 reduced local roadway segments impacts (Impact 4.11-6) to
a less-than-significantlevel by requiring the widening of Hacienda Drive between
Central Parkway and Gleason Drive from three to four lanes and the Scarlett Drive
extension should be constructed between Dublin Boulevard andDougherty Road.
No feasible mitigation was found to reduce impacts to mainline freewayoperations in the year
2025 (Impact 4.11-7) and this impact was found to be significant and unavoidable.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 247
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 43
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a-b, f) Conflict with applicable transportation plans standards, including congestion
managementplans
No newimpact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR considered the development of the project site
with residential land uses on the localand regional roadway and freeway networks and
adopted mitigation measures to address transportation impacts. The total number of units
constructed within Sites A, B and C ofthe Dublin Transit Center project area, including the
proposed projectwould be1,451 units, 49 units less than the total allocation of 1,500 units as
analyzed inthe previous CEQA document. Therefore, the proposed project, in context to the
greater Dublin Transit Center project would generate fewer daily and AM and PM peak hour
trips than previously analyzed.
Furthermore, the City of Dublin has adopted a Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program which requires
developers to contribute their 'fair-share' of sub-regional traffic improvements required for
new development within the Eastern Dublin area, which includes the Dublin Transit Center
project area. The project is within the scope and level of development and impacts and is
required to participate in the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Program.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, including payment of fees, there would
be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to applicable transportation plans
standards, including congestionmanagement plans, beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
c) Change in air traffic patterns
No NewImpact. The proposed project would have no impacton air traffic patterns, since it
involves residential development and is locatedoutside of the Livermore Airport general
referral area.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to air traffic patterns
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
No NewImpact. Approval of the proposed project would add sidewalks and other vehicular
and pedestrian travel ways where none currently exist . The proposed project would be
required to comply with current City engineering design standards and other safety standards
to ensure that no safety hazards would becreated or exacerbated.
With adherence to applicable regulatoryrequirements, there would be nonew or substantially
more severe significantimpacts to mobility design features beyond what has been analyzed in
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 248
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 44
the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access
No New Impact. Fire access to the building will be along the southern property boundary
Campbell Lane). Noimpacts would result with respect to emergency access.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to emergency access
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
f) Conflict with adopted alternative transportation plans
No New Impact. The proposed project would include on-site bicycle parking and sidewalks
providing connections between proposedbuildings andnearby streets. No conflicts to plans,
policies or programs that promote public transit, pedestrian use or similarfeatures were
identifiedin previous CEQA reviews for the subject property . Furthermore, the project
proposes to implement/construct the following items consistent with the City’s Complete
Streets Policy:
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant parking spaces
ADA compliant sidewalks and curb ramps
Emergency vehicle access to the project site
With adherence to applicable regulatoryrequirements, there would be nonew or substantially
more severe significantimpacts to adopted alternative transportation plans beyond what has
been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental
review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Complete Streets Principals adoptedby the City Council of the City of Dublin
Resolution No. 199-12, December 4, 2013.
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
TribalCultural Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 249
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 45
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
17. TRIBALCULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change inthe
significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public ResourcesCode section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical
resources as defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
b) A resource determinedby the lead agency, inits
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c)
of Public Resources Code Section5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shallconsider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures from the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources
No NewImpact. The site is vacant andcontains no historically significant resources . There
would therefore be no impacts to historical resources.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to historical resources
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
b) Significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public ResourcesCode Section
5024.1
No NewImpact. The project is subject to existing cultural resource mitigation measures
contained in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
There are noknown significant Tribal Cultural Resources on the Project site. Impact 4.4-1
contained in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR found a potentially significant impact with respect to
unknown Native American resources on the project site. This impact was reduced by Mitigation
Measure 4.4-1 that required, if archeological, archeological or Native American artifacts are
encountered during construction, work on the project shall cease until compliance with CEQA
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 250
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 46
Guidelines Section 15064.5 is demonstrated. Work on the project maycommence under the
guidance of an approved resource protection plan. The CountyCoroner is to be contacted if
human remainsareuncovered.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to this applicable mitigation measure as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or more severe significant impacts to TribalCultural Resources beyond those
previously analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Utilities and Service Systems
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction or which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? (V.4)
d) Have sufficient water suppliesavailable to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the projectprojected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 251
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 47
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No
New
Impact
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity
to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal
needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The following utility services impacts and mitigation measures were notedin the Dublin Transit
Center EIR.
Mitigation Measure4.12-4 reduced impacts to provision of electrical service to the
Transit Center site (Impact 4.12-8) to a less-than-significantlevel by requiring Applicants
for individualprojects to submit a will-serve letters to the City prior to issuance of a
building permit.
The proposed project will berequired to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR.
Project Impacts
a, e) Wastewater treatment requirements and facilities
No NewImpact. The total number of units constructed within Sites A, B and C of the Dublin
Transit Center project area, including the proposed projectwould be 1,451 units, 49 units less
than the total allocation of 1,500 units as analyzed in the previous CEQA document . The
addition of wastewaterflows from the proposed project would not cause the plant to exceed
local, state, and federal waterquality standards. The proposed projectwould not change the
urban scale of developmentanticipated .
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to wastewater
treatment requirements beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin TransitCenter EIR and
no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
b) Require construction of new water and wastewaterfacilities
No NewImpact. Water, recycled water and wastewater extensions to existing mains that
currently exist within the Dublin TransitCenter would need to be constructed to serve the
project site. Treatment and disposal facilities from the construction of the proposed project
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 252
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 48
would not result in a new or more severe significantimpacts than were analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR, which assumed residential development on Site A at a higher density than
now proposed.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to water or wastewater
treatment facilities beyond what has been analyzed in previous CEQA documents, and no
additional analysis is required.
c) Stormwater drainage
No New Impact. As shown in Figure 9: Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan, new on• site
drainage facilities would beconstructed as part of project construction . The proposed project
would require new and or upgradeddrainage facilities to support the proposed development.
Consistent with the City requirements, the project Applicant will be required to install new or
upgraded on and off-site (if required) storm drain systems that comply with City of Dublin and
Zone 7 standards. The current projectwould include flow-through planter boxes and a
stormwater treatment vault to ensure consistency with regional C.3 stormwater treatment and
hydromodification requirements.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significantimpacts to stormwater drainage beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin TransitCenter EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
d) Sufficient water supply
No NewImpact. Approval of the proposed project would result in anincreased demand for
water for domestic and irrigation purposes, similar to water use projections previously
analyzed, as identified in the previous CEQA document. The increased water demand could be
accommodated by DSRSD and Zone 7 facilities and long-term supplies. Recycled water would
be supplied to the project site for landscape irrigation by DSRSD. The project Applicant would
be required to provide any local extensions and connections to the existingrecycled water
lines.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to water supply beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmentalreview is required.
f, g) Solid waste disposal and regulatory compliance
No NewImpact. Approval of the proposed project would incrementally increase the generation
of solid waste. Over the long term, the amount of solidwastereaching the landfillwould
decrease as statewide regulationsmandating increased recycling take effect . The Dublin Transit
Center EIR found that there would beadequate capacity within the local landfill to
accommodate increases in the amount of solid waste. Information contained in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR indicates that additional equipment and personnel would beneeded to
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 253
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
City of Dublin Ashton DublinStation CEQA Analysis
Page 49
collect the increased amount of solid waste. However, increasedfeesand user charges would
offset anyincreased capital and/or personnel costs.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significantimpacts to solid waste disposal
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
California Department of ResourcesRecycling and Recovery. 2017. “Solid Waste Information
System.” Website: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/Default.htm .
Accessed September 7, 2017.
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Dublin San Ramon Services District. 2017. “FactSheet.” Website:
http://www.dsrsd.com/home/showdocument?id=811. Accessed September 7, 2017.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 254
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
Figure 1: Project Vicinity and Loca on
Dublin Sta on
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemp on
Not to scale
LEGEND
Project Site
Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, 2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 255
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure 2: Dublin TransitCenter LandUse Plan
Dublin Sta on
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemp on
Not to scale
De
Marcu
s
Bl
vd
Iron
Ho
rs
e
Pkwy
Arno
ld
Bl
vd
LEGEND
ProjectSite
Dublin Transit Center Project Area
MediumDensity Residential
High Density Residential
Public/Semi-Public
CampusOffice
Dublin Blvd
A-1 A-2
A-3
B-1/2 E-1
E-2
Campbell Ln
C-1
D-1
D-2
East Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station
Interstate 580
Source: Kimley-Hornand Associates, 2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 256
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Ccpect More. Experience 8e11er. CEQAAnalysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Source:BAR Architects,2017
Figure 3: Aerial Perspective
Dublin Station Site Kimley>>>Horn
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 257
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure 4a: Level 1 Floor Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect Mora. Expariaooe Battar.
b
W- Oor =:=-fl"""'l
l. 1'
II' CD
NC If'SAJtM.lCJotiiEOlit«JJCfW1! sz ---
04U6(81;. 8'
c:J== --- -- - -- --- -- - - _n_I_M_ft-=c:J== ------------------ c:J ---------------------'
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 258
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure 4b: Level 3 Floor Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect Mora. Expariaooe Battar.
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 259
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Kimley >>>Horn
Expect More. Experience Better.
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
taa ·T II' !r _ -- --. .---- ------ ZD · • Vl' _! ------ - --------- - lr·.r' S ; n t;rll ·T ,lI
lifO
A
A20 b
i
b '
l
t $-\(C·'.:. '-- -,. -, _j
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
I)()' 01/:T
I.M'• lt /2" n· -r
Q)
Figure4c: Level 6 Floor Plan
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 260
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure Sa: View FromSoutheast Corner- Campbell Lane and De Marcus Boulevard
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support ofa Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Ccpect More. Experience 8e11er.
Source:BAR Architects,2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 261
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure Sb: View From SouthwestCorner- Campbell Lane
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support ofa Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect Mont. Experience Better.
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 262
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure Sc: View From Northwest Corner- CampbellLane
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support ofa Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect Mont. Experience Better.
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 263
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Kimley>>>Horn
Ccpect More. Experience 8e11er.
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support ofa Specific Plan Exemption
Source:BAR Architects,2017
Figure Sd: View From Northeast Corner- DeMarcus Boulevard
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 264
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
LA
N
E
WE
S
T
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
VAR
D
CA
M
P
B
ELL
LN
PERCENT LANDSCAPING LEGEND GENERAL NOTES:
GROUND LEVEL:
69.9% HARDSCAPE, 18,850 SF
25.5% PLANTING AREA, 6,881 SF
3.9% BIORETENTION PLANTER, 1,042 SF
0.7% ARTIFICAL TURF, 185 SF
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
PODIUM:
52.2% HARDSCAPE, 12,778 SF
25.8% RAISED PLANTER, 6,308 SF
11.5% BIORETENTIONPLANTER, 2,809 SF
5.5% ARTIFICIAL TURF, 1,355 SF
5.0% POOL, 1,210 SF
CAMELLIA PLACE
PROPERTY LINE
LIMIT OF WORK
1. ALL IRRIGATION AT SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTINGS TO BEDRIP IRRIGATION. INDIVIDUAL
BUBBLERS WILL BE PROVIDED AT TREE PLANTINGS.
2. ALL PLANTINGAREAS TO INCLUDE 3” LAYER OF 3/8” BLACK
MINI-CHIP MULCH
3. SOIL ANALYSIS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH FINAL LANDSCAPE
PLAN WITH BUILDING PERMIT/IMPROVEMENT PLANS
4. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FALLS TO OWNER
FORSITE AND SIDEWALKDIRECTLYADJACENT TO THE
BUILDING. THE CITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STREET
AND ANY MEDIAN ISLANDS
L2.00
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
L5.00 PL L3.00
WEST
PL PODIUM
COURTYARD
EAST
PODIUM PL
COURTYARD
KEY PLAN
SHARED PRIVATE
PL
CAMPBELL LANE SOUTH L4.00
scale: 1” = 20’ N
Source: FletcherStudio, 2017
Figure 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan
Dublin Sta on
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 265
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure 7: Preliminary Grading Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect More. Experience Beller,
m=_,- =mA _,
1 ,.",,
r
C'
J.J
j r 3 ;,0 1
Irwz
J
J
Jw
aJ (
l_ :;;
0
1-,i:'"
r..J, 3.;o
L------.-
0
0::
J ::::
l
I ! (f)
l
0
0:: <( :;;
w
0
CAMPBELL LANE
LEGEND: GRADING NOTES:
I .,.!-..3.4.o .JJo -..q I
t - -----21ll ,
POIEN14L I LUW-IHRU f'LAr-.1"
SEE: Of: T AIL 1 /C.'> D)
1 hl GRffi r,G \'10111. SHALl Bf IN
Cll:;FOR"'ANCE Wl l'1 THE PR O.£Cl
lJo ci'iE:},P;s.
0>1' J C VAriUI, RLUUI"'lMlNlS.
Ex CONroUR
DRIVEWAY DETAIL
1M 10' ?0 0
Source: BKF,2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 266
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure 8: Preliminary Utility Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Ana lysisin Support of a SpecificPlan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect More.Experience Better.
Ico·11rcr a
f( g• w
COI II[CT fO
6" PW ·1 ...++--·u7l··.·P...
I'-·++··- ··-··· '-·--
1· ..........."'
tl5 U" TRENH: o;;;rr ---..,
r · 001 J!l2.5t)
wz <( ---'
w--' m
Q_ ::;;;
0
0cr
GJ
g
UJ =>
0cr
I ::;;; w
0
I·
PR SA fJITAR ( SEWER UfJE
PR Oct t_TIC 'NA fER W•E
PP "PE WATER LINE
fLO ft-.-THPU PLANIEfo' (SEE DETAIL 1/C5 0)
FRE WA.TEP BAC-FLO'N
PRE\'EfHEf> (BFP) W lH fiRE
OEPARfM DH COr<r,LCnON (fDC)
MAfjH()L( (MH)
POST INDICATOR V.I..L VE (PrV)
1 riOSE 8185 J.!Ll!3E PR0v10ED •N CARAGE
fOR PlR00 C 'I.'ASH 0001'1
20 -0 -
Source: BKF,2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 267
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect More.Experience Bener.
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in S upport of a Specifi c Plan E x emption
f
1"-:UJ'
It ---,---- ------ - - ; - -- - ------ -
wz :
5
j
jw
CD
0.. ::;:
0
0::
CAMPBELL LANE
t
NO TES:
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j ::::>
0
CD
f) ::::>
0
0:: <( ::;:
w
0
L
I
I
PROPERf'r' UNC l ThiS PRO.f:Cf OOALIFIC::S f 90 TRANSIT- DF'IEIHE:O OE ,.'ELOPMEIH {TOO)
Cf;l(OTS U"IDER THE MCATEG001 C SPECIAL PROJECT CRIT[RIA
f>R STOP r.1 Dfl:ALJIll
DR >'.IrJtiGE /,REA BOUNDARY POl[N
IIAL rLOW ll i RU Pl..ANl[R
E_[ (lllA IL 1, SHEET 5.1)
J:ll!LOlllilll5 -.-sor. - LOCATION
20)1'; - OENSI TJ
2tr.":- PA •NG
91):'; - TOTAl CREDI TS
11Tt11N 0.25 IW .£5 OF tX:ST'NG TR.ti.NSIT rlUB j
60 DU j.o\.C] [
0AT-GRADE PAR II-.:Gl
lIMPERVIOUSRODrAR£1-. ORMI NG
TO Fl ()W-lRU PI...AIHFR
PIIERVIO,JS PAVEMErJT ORAINI'>JG
TOLANDSCPE \\HH 2:1 RATIO
ORAJW<GE. DIPECTH.X\/ASlLOPE
2 i-LOWTH"'U Pt..A.NTERS f..ND BIORE ilNTI ON A.RE.AS ARESIZED FOR: ,.; OF IH
II?[RVIOUS AR(A DRAINING TO TH[I f"(R TH[ FLO'N TR(AiM(NT SI;:INC
t_fHOO """"- -0- 20 ,
Source:BKF, 2017
Figure 9: Preliminary Storm Water Control Plan
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 268
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure 10: Preliminary Erosion Control Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley >>>Horn
Expect More. Experience Better.
CAMPBELL LANE
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES:
0
0::
w -' ::
J
0co
J ()
0:: <>: ::
2w
0
FIBLRf-<OLLPmCITYSllJ. PLAN
C0-702
INLf_f '>EDIME>.,JT [jAF<RIEf< PH<
PLAN CD-703
1 >'I,UI'O LO IMI'IWVLMLNIS AJ-(L ':iHUWr>< WITHIN IHl Llf./1 Ul WOi<K_ CUNTI<AC:lUT< ';HALL IN':>TALL AN:J
MUUI ' 'T' EIW::>UN CONHWL Mc_A:::.L-Rl':i M':i NLCLS:::.AI'Y UNTIL l'f<UJLCl CLOSL OUT
CONSrRuCTION FE'NCING WITH PRIVACY
GREE) SCREEN 3 CONIRAC!OR SIIALL PLACE STABILillO CONSTRUCTION lNlRAr\C[ AS NE.EDED f-'[R
DETAIL 3/C6' UNTIL BUILDING SLAEJ HASBEEt-. POURED
SIAl:RILIU CUNSIIWCIIU"' LNIIIANCc
f'LR CIIYSIU I'LAN CU-/CJ1 4 ALLNEW ONSITE STOR ORAIN STRuCTURES SHALL BE CAPPED ORPLUGGED UNTIL SITE IS STAB,LIZED
OR FITTED W1Trl APPROPRIATEEROSION CONTROL MEASURES
20 0 !"""..=-
1"=20'
Source: BKF, 2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 269
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Figure 11: FaultTrench Locations
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect More. Experience Better.
EXPLANATION
Pleaoant fauR aoe. c!a'hed where inferred.
J.Jer1ed \ldlere UlCef1ain
Fault trench a gnment and locations. Bertogar.
S<Mms & Associates, 2013
Note·
Fault 1rench locailonsas clepicted on Plato 2
Berlogar, Slovens & Associates.March 2013)
and Plate 4 (Berlogar, Stevens & Associates,
March 2012).
Appro>cimate scale
UOR DUBLIN STATION
Dublin, California
FAULT TRENCH LOCATIONS BY OTHERS
FOR DUBLIN STATION AND VICINITY
Source: Langan, 2017
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 270
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
Source: FEMA, 2017
Figure 12: Flood Hazard Area
LEGEND
Project Site
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
500 Year Flood Hazard)
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
100 Year Flood Hazard)
Dublin Sta on
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 271
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
7.
1
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
7
2
Attachment: 2. Letter from Bob McCullough of UDR to City Council, dated December 19, 2017 (Ashton at Dublin Station Transit Center Site A-3)
Page 1 of 5
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consideration of Potential Ballot Measures on Council and Mayoral Term
Limits and Mayoral Term of Office
Prepared by: John Bakker, City Attorney
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On December 5, 2017, the City Council reviewed the provisions of the Municipal Code
that establish term limits for the offices of the City Council and Mayor. The City Council
directed Staff to return with the three separate potential measures. Two of the items
would make changes to the existing term limits for the Mayor and City Council. The
other would change the term of office for the Mayor from two years to four years. If the
City Council desires to have the voters consider any of the proposed measures, it can
direct Staff to return with resolutions calling an election on one or more of the proposed
measures.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Provide direction to Staff.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
City Staff is working with the Alameda County Registrar of Voters to determine the
estimated cost of placing one or more measures on the ballot, including costs
associated with translation, proofing, and printing and mailing the Voter Information
Guide and Sample Ballot. Since the measure or measures would likely be consolidated
with the June 2018 primary or the November 2018 general election, the costs are
anticipated to be between $107,664 and $161,496.
DESCRIPTION:
On December 5, 2017, the City Council reviewed the term limits of the City Council and
Mayor (Dublin Municipal Code section 2.08.050) and directed staff to return with the
following three separate items for the Council to review and consider placing on a future
ballot:
1. Establishing separate term limits for the office of Mayor and City Council
(allowing an individual to consecutively serve 2 terms as a member of the City
7.2
Packet Pg. 273
Page 2 of 5
Council and 4 terms as Mayor);
2. Increasing the term limits from 2 to 3 terms for the City Council and 4 to 6 terms
for the Mayor; and
3. Increasing the Mayoral term from 2 to 4 years.
Three proposed ordinances are attached that, if approved by the voters, would
accomplish each of these objectives. Each draft ordinance is discussed in more detail
below.
Text of Proposed Measures
1. Separate Term Limits for City Council and Mayor
This proposed ordinance (Attachment 1) would allow a City Councilmember who
has served two consecutive terms to serve as Mayor for four subsequent and
consecutive terms. Under the current Code, a City Councilmember who has
served two consecutive terms cannot serve a subsequent and consecutive term
as Mayor.
Similarly, the proposed ordinance would allow a Mayor who has served four
consecutive terms to serve as a City Councilmember for two subsequent and
consecutive terms. Under the current Code, a Mayor who has served three or
four consecutive terms cannot serve a subsequent and consecutive term as a
City Councilmember.
The following shows a markup of the proposed amendment to Section 2.08.05 0
of the Municipal Code:
A. No person shall serve as Councilmember for more than two (2)
consecutive terms, nor shall any person serve as Mayor for more than four (4)
consecutive terms. In addition: (A) no person who has served as a
Councilmember for one (1) term shall serve more than two (2) terms as Mayor if
the terms as Councilmember and Mayor are consecutive; (B) no person who has
served as Councilmember for two (2) consecutive terms shall serve a
consecutive term as Mayor; (C) no person who has served as Mayor for three (3)
or four (4) consecutive terms shall serve a consecutive term as a
Councilmember; (D) no person who has served as Mayor for two (2) consecutive
terms shall serve more than one (1) succeeding consecutive term as
Councilmember; (E) no person who has served consecutive terms as Mayor and
Councilmember shall serve more than one (1) more consecutive term as Mayor;
and (F) no person who has served consecutive terms as Mayor and
Councilmember shall serve another consecutive term as Councilmember.
B. No person shall serve any combination of consecutive terms as
Councilmember and Mayor that cumulatively exceed sixteen (16) years.
C. As used herein, a person shall be considered to have served a term of
office as a Councilmember if such person has served as a Councilmember for
7.2
Packet Pg. 274
Page 3 of 5
two (2) years plus one (1) day and a person shall be considered to have served a
term of office as Mayor if such person has served as Mayor for one (1) year plus
one (1) day.
Subdivision B is designed to prevent a scenario where an individual extends his or her
consecutive time in office beyond 16 consecutive years. For example, the language in
subdivision A by itself would allow an individual to serve alternate terms as a City
Councilmember and Mayor without a limit, since he or she would not have served more
than either two consecutive council terms or four consecutive mayoral terms.
2. Increase Term Limits for Mayor and City Council
This proposed ordinance (Attachment 2) would increase the term limit for City
Councilmembers from two to three terms and increase the term limit for Mayor
from four to six terms. The following shows a markup of the proposed
amendment to Section 2.08.050 of the Municipal Code:
A. No person shall serve as Councilmember for more than three two (32)
consecutive terms, nor shall any person serve as Mayor for more than six four
(64) consecutive terms. In addition: (A) no person who has served as a
Councilmember for one (1) term shall serve more than two (2) terms as Mayor if
the terms as Councilmember and Mayor are consecutive; (B) no person who has
served as Councilmember for two (2) consecutive terms shall serve a
consecutive term as Mayor; (C) no person who has served as Mayor for three (3)
or four (4) consecutive terms shall serve a consecutive term as a
Councilmember; (D) no person who has served as Mayor for two (2) consecutive
terms shall serve more than one (1) succeeding consecutive term as
Councilmember; (E) no person who has served consecutive terms as Mayor and
Councilmember shall serve more than one (1) more consecutive term as Mayor;
and (F) no person who has served consecutive terms as Mayor and
Councilmember shall serve another consecutive term as Councilmember.
B. No person shall serve any combination of consecutive terms as
Councilmember and Mayor that cumulatively exceed twelve (12) years.
C. As used herein, a person shall be considered to have served a term of
office as a Councilmember if such person has served as a Councilmember for
two (2) years plus one (1) day and a person shall be considered to have served a
term of office as Mayor if such person has served as Mayor for one (1) year plus
one (1) day.
Under the current Code, a City Council term is four years, and a mayoral term is two
years. Increasing the City Council term limit to three terms would allow a
Councilmember to serve terms of up to 12 consecutive years. Similarly, increasing the
mayoral term limit to six two-year terms would allow a Mayor to serve terms of up to 12
years. The second sentence of existing section 2.08.050 limits any combination of
Mayoral and Council consecutive terms to terms that do not exceed eight years, and it
does so by listing every possible combination. Proposed subdivision B accomplishes
the same policy goal with simpler language and increases the cumulative limit from 8 to
12 years, consistent with the increase from 2 to 3 council terms and 4 to 6 mayoral
7.2
Packet Pg. 275
Page 4 of 5
terms.
3. Increase Term of Office for Mayor
This proposed ordinance (Attachment 3) would amend Section 2.08.030 to
increase the term of office for the Mayor from two years to four years:
The following shows a markup of the proposed amendment to Section 2.08.030
of the Municipal Code:
A. The electors shall hereafter elect a Mayor and four (4) City Councilmembers.
B. The term of office of the Mayor shall be four two (42) years.
Next Steps
If the City Council desires to proceed with one or more of the proposed amendments,
the City Council should give direction to Staff to return at a future meeting with
resolutions calling a municipal election on the measure or measures to be considered
by the voters.
If the City Council desires to place more than one of the items on the ballot, it will need
to determine whether the ordinances should be considered as a single ballot measure
or separately. If they are considered as a single item, Staff would need to revise the
proposed text to reflect the City Council’s policy objectives. For example, the City
Council might choose to propose a revision to the term limits section that both increased
the council term limit from 2 to 3 terms and the mayoral limit from 4 to 6 terms and
eliminated the restrictions on separate terms. Staff would need to prepare revised
ordinance text to accomplish both objectives. Similarly, if the City Council wanted to
propose an increase in the Mayoral term and either or both of the proposed changes to
the terms limits, the text would need to be revised to account for the fact that the term
limits applies to terms and an increase in the length of the term would allow a mayor to
serve longer than either 8 or 12 years. In either case, Staff would need to prepare
revised ordinance text to accomplish the City Council’s objective.
If the items were presented to the voters as separate ballot measures, the language of
each measure would need to anticipate the possibility that both or only one might pass.
The increase in the Mayoral term, as noted above, would impact the operation of the
term limits. Staff would propose to anticipate the possibility by drafting an ordinance
that contains two versions of the amendments. One would apply if both measures
passed, and the other would apply if only one of the measures passed.
Election Dates and Costs.
Upcoming election dates include two countywide elections, the June 5, 2018 primary
and the November 6, 2018 general election. To place a measure on the ballot for the
June 2018 election, the City Council would need to adopt a resolution calling the
election by March 9, 2018. To place a measure on the ballot for the November 6, 2018
election is August 10, 2018.
7.2
Packet Pg. 276
Page 5 of 5
Election costs are presently unknown. The Alameda County Registrar of Voters’
website indicates that the costs would be approximately $4-$6 per voter at a countywide
consolidated election such as the two upcoming elections. Based on the 26,916
registered voters in Dublin as of February 10, 2017, that would equate to an estimated
cost of between $107,664 and $161,496. Staff is contacting the Registrar of Voters to
obtain an estimate of the costs that the County would charge the City for an election on
one or more of the measures. Staff will also attempt to determine whether there are
differential costs for multiple ballot measures and for measures that are consolidated
with other City elections, such as the November 6, 2018 election where the mayor and
two city council seats will be elected.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance Amending Combined Consecutive Term Limits for Offices of Mayor and
City Council
2. Ordinance Amending Term Limits for Offices of Mayor and City Council
3. Ordinance Amending Term of Office for Office of Mayor
7.2
Packet Pg. 277
ORDINANCE NO. ____ - ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
AMENDING CITY COUNCIL AND MAYORAL TERM LIMITS TO ESTABLISH
SEPARATE TERM LIMITS FOR THE OFFICE OF COUNCIL MEMBER AND
MAYOR
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Term Limits.
Section 2.08.050 of the Dublin Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
“2.08.050 Term limits.
A. No person shall serve as Councilmember for more than two (2) consecutive terms, nor shall
any person serve as Mayor for more than four (4) consecutive terms.
B. No person shall serve any combination of consecutive terms as Councilmember or Mayor
that cumulatively exceed sixteen (16) consecutive years.
C. As used herein, a person shall be considered to have served a term of office as a
Councilmember if such person has served as a Councilmember for two (2) years plus one (1) day
and a person shall be considered to have served a term of office as Mayor if such person has
served as Mayor for one (1) year plus one (1) day. ”
SECTION 2. Effective Date
If approved by a majority of the voters, this ordinance shall be considered as adopted upon the
date that the vote is declared by the City Council and shall go into effect ten (10) days after that
date as provided in Elections Code section 9217.
SECTION 3. Posting
The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three
public places in the City of Dublin in accordance Government Code section 36933.
APPROVED by the following vote of the people on _____________:
CITY OF DUBLIN MEASURE ___:
Yes Votes = _______ No Votes = ______
ADOPTED by Declaration of the vote by the City Council of the City of Dublin on
_____________.
Effective on _______________.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 278
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
C
o
n
s
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
f
o
r
O
f
f
i
c
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
o
r
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST: ____________________________
City Clerk
2904929.4
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 279
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
C
o
n
s
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
f
o
r
O
f
f
i
c
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
o
r
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
ORDINANCE NO. ____ - ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
INCREASING THE CITY COUNCIL TERM LIMIT FROM 2 TO 3 TERMS AND THE
MAYORAL TERM LIMIT FROM 4 TO 6 TERMS
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Term Limits.
Section 2.08.050 of the Dublin Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
“2.08.050 Term limits.
A. No person shall serve as Councilmember for more than three (3) consecutive terms, nor
shall any person serve as Mayor for more than six (6) consecutive terms.
B. No person shall serve any combination of consecutive terms as Councilmember and
Mayor that cumulatively exceed twelve (12) years.
C. As used herein, a person shall be considered to have served a term of office as a
Councilmember if such person has served as a Councilmember for two (2) years plus one (1) day
and a person shall be considered to have served a term of office as Mayor if such person has
served as Mayor for one (1) year plus one (1) day.”
SECTION 2. Effective Date
If approved by a majority of the voters, this ordinance shall be considered as adopted upon the
date that the vote is declared by the City Council and shall go into effect ten (10) days after that
date as provided in Elections Code section 9217.
SECTION 3. Posting
The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three
public places in the City of Dublin in accordance Government Code section 36933.
APPROVED by the following vote of the people on _____________:
CITY OF DUBLIN MEASURE ___:
Yes Votes = _______ No Votes = ______
ADOPTED by Declaration of the vote by the City Council of the City of Dublin on
_____________.
Effective on _______________.
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 280
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
f
o
r
O
f
f
i
c
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
o
r
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST: ____________________________
City Clerk
2904927.3
7.2.b
Packet Pg. 281
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
f
o
r
O
f
f
i
c
e
s
o
f
M
a
y
o
r
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
ORDINANCE NO. ____ - ____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
AMENDING TERM OF OFFICE FOR THE
OFFICE OF MAYOR FROM 2 TO 4 YEARS
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Election of Mayor and Councilmembers—Term of office
Section 2.08.030 of the Dublin Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
“2.08.030 Election of Mayor and Councilmembers—Term of office.
A. The electors shall hereafter elect a Mayor and four (4) City Councilmembers.
B. The term of office of the Mayor shall be four (4) years.”
SECTION 2. Effective Date
If approved by a majority of the voters, this ordinance shall be considered as adopted upon the
date that the vote is declared by the City Council and shall go into effect ten (10) days after that
date as provided in Elections Code section 9217.
SECTION 3. Posting
The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three
public places in the City of Dublin in accordance Government Code section 36933.
APPROVED by the following vote of the people on _____________:
CITY OF DUBLIN MEASURE ___:
Yes Votes = _______ No Votes = ______
ADOPTED by Declaration of the vote by the City Council of the City of Dublin on
_____________.
Effective on _______________.
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST: ____________________________
City Clerk
2904926.3
7.2.c
Packet Pg. 282
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
T
e
r
m
o
f
O
f
f
i
c
e
f
o
r
O
f
f
i
c
e
o
f
M
a
y
o
r
(
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
Page 1 of 4
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Utility Box Art 2018 Design Selection
Prepared by: Tegan McLane, Cultural Arts & Heritage Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider a recommendation from the Heritage and Cultural Arts
Commission for artwork to be painted on eight utility boxes along Amador Valley
Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard, under the Utility Box Art Program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission's selections for the Utility Box Art
Program.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The cost of the 2018 Utility Box Art Program, including artist payments and Staff time, is
estimated at $9,200. Per the Public Art Ordinance, this project is eligible for funding with
Public Art Fund monies, and the City Council approved $9,200 for the purpose of this
program at its June 6, 2017 meeting.
DESCRIPTION:
At the June 6, 2017 meeting, the City Council approved and funded the Utility Box Art
Program to paint eight boxes in 2018 – three along Amador Valley Boulevard between
Brighton Drive and Stagecoach Road and five along Dublin Boulevard between
Hacienda Drive and Glynnis Rose Drive.
The City Council approved the Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission’s recommended
theme, “New American Backyard,” weaving in the culture, history and natural beauty of
Dublin. This theme was intended to allow for a wide variety of artistic styles and
interpretations throughout the City.
Staff issued a Call for Artists on September 1, 2017, publicizing the opportunity through
normal City channels (website, etc.), as well as via email to local public school art
teachers, private art studios, registrants in the Cultural Arts Database, nearby cities with
7.3
Packet Pg. 283
Page 2 of 4
successful utility box art programs, and the California Cultural Arts Council website. The
deadline to apply was October 31, 2017.
The City of Dublin’s Public Art Master Plan requires all public art projects be produced
by professional artists or under the direction of a professional artist. However, because
there has been interest in making the utility box project available to student artists,
students were encouraged to apply and work under the supervision of an art teacher or
other professional artist.
Three students and 15 professional artists submitted a total of 30 designs for
consideration. One of the student submissions was from an art teacher supervising a
group of 10 high school juniors. Most are local to the Bay Area; one artist from Southern
California withdrew when informed that Dublin would not pay travel costs on this project.
The Cultural Arts Commission recommended the following assignments, and supplied a
ninth choice, should the City Council prefer to remove any of these designs or should
any of the artists decline to paint their assigned box.
Box A – Amador Valley Road at Brighton Drive (residential area)
The Commission recommended a design by Rikki List of Redwood City, titled
“Evolution of Lawn Mower,” featuring lawn mowing raccoons. The raccoons are dressed
in attire from different historical periods and using lawn mowers appropriate to that era .
The Commission noted that this humorous design was appropriate for this typical
suburban residential neighborhood where many homeowners still have traditional lawns
in their front or backyards and the chore of lawn-mowing is very familiar. (Attachment 1)
Box B – Amador Valley Road at Iron Horse Trail (residential and trail)
The Commission recommended a design by Anthony Michael Diaz of San Leandro,
titled “Iron Horse,” featuring a horse made of iron and train tracks. The box is painted to
look like iron with some intentional rusting. Its corners are decorated with a leaf design
adapted from the Alameda County Sheriff’s badges. (Attachment 2)
Box C – Amador Valley Road at Stagecoach Road (residential area)
The Commission recommended a design by Suzanna Gayle of Hayward, titled
“Around the Neighborhood,” featuring “local wildlife neighbors pictured in poses of
curiosity, as they relax and catch up with each other over a fence, just as human
neighbors chat with each other in their backyards.” The Commission noted that this
design was appropriate for residential neighborhood which backs up to open space
where raccoons, deer, squirrels and birds are commonly seen. Ms. Gayle painted two of
the boxes under the pilot program last year – the colorful shamrocks on Village in front
of Dublin High School and the puppy and kitten box at Village Parkway and Tamarack
Drive. (Attachment 3)
Box D – Dublin Boulevard at Hacienda Drive (Hacienda Crossing)
The Commission recommended a second design by Suzanna Gayle of Hayward, titled
“Dublin at Dusk,” represents the community and families gathering to enjoy a
7.3
Packet Pg. 284
Page 3 of 4
neighborhood picnic at sunset. As Ms. Gayle is very experienced in painting utility
boxes, the Commission felt her artwork would be a good choice for this highly visible
corner near a gateway to Dublin. (Attachment 3)
Box E – Dublin Boulevard at Hibernia (Hacienda Crossing)
The Commission recommended a second design by Anthony Michael Diaz of San
Leandro, featuring a popcorn box. The Commission wanted to include this cheerful
homage to our local movie theater at one of the entrances to Hacienda Crossing and
felt this would be a nice landmark for visitors coming to the theater. (Attachment 2)
Box F – Dublin Boulevard at Toyota Drive (Hacienda Crossing)
The Commission recommended a design by Sarah Lee of Dublin, featuring common
house finches, seen and living in the backyards of our homes. “Not only do they bring
vibrancy to our yard, they are highly social birds and are rarely seen alone. Just like in a
community, they flock together. Dublin is very nature-oriented, filled with parks and
many outdoor activities. It serves as a gathering place for both residents and visitors,
who value community and connections, just like the birds in our backyards.”
(Attachment 4)
Box G – Dublin Boulevard at John Monego Court
The Commission recommended a design submitted by Quarry Lane School art
teacher Bora Shin, featuring the collaborative artwork of 10 high school junior art
students: Menghua Dong, Seung Woo Lee, Angelica Morgan, Mianqun Hu, Shang-
Yi Lan, Yun Liu, Mengze Ma, Keya Vijapure, Jiaxi Xu and Xiangyi Xu. The design
features a tree, symbolizing unity, and shamrock-shaped international flags
representing the diversity of Dublin’s residents. Each branch unfolds to symbolize an
activity people enjoy in the New American Backyard, such as hiking, cycling or
barbecuing. The Commission was excited to select this student artwork and pleased
that these students applied with a supervising teacher, according to the rules of the
Public Art program. The Commission did request that the students incorporate a
shamrock with an American flag somewhere on the box. (Attachment 5)
Box H – Dublin Boulevard at Glynnis Rose Drive
The Commission recommended a design by Jennifer Huber of Dublin, titled “Kite
Festival,” which was inspired by Fallon Middle School’s kite festival, as well as the
regular kite flyers in the northeast corner of Emerald Glen Park. “Whether we are from
the East Coast or East Asia, we find simple pleasure in keeping fabric, strings and string
aloft in the nearly constant winds of Dublin. On most weekends, folks of all ages can be
found flying homemade kites, Costco kites, acrobatic kites and even the mammoth
gliders with yards of trailing tails in the green parks or golden hills of Dublin.” The
Commission thought this design was especially appropriate for Glynnis Rose Drive,
which serves as a route to Emerald Glen Park. (Attachment 6)
7.3
Packet Pg. 285
Page 4 of 4
Alternate Design
In case a design is rejected, or an artist withdraws, the Commission recommended a
ninth design by the father-son team, Rob and Chili Corder of Danville. The design
uses “a see-through picket fence symbolic of a friendly, peaceful, approachable
neighborhood that is traditional, picturesque, and strongly supports a wide range of
(fictitiously colored bird) inhabitants that are each unique in their own colorful way.” The
Corders’ design has an eco-friendly worm and three-leaf clover hidden within it to be
discovered by those taking a closer look. (Attachment 7)
The artists’ resumes, designs, and statements are attached.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A courtesy notice of this item was sent to businesses and residents within 300 feet of
the proposed boxes.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. List Utility Box Design Proposal
2. Diaz Utility Box Design Proposal
3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal
4. Lee Utility Box Design Proposal
5. Shin Quarry Lane Team Utility Box Design Proposal
6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal
7. Corder Utility Box Design Proposal
7.3
Packet Pg. 286
7.
3
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
8
7
Attachment: 1. List Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
8
8
Attachment: 1. List Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
8
9
Attachment: 1. List Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
a
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
0
Attachment: 1. List Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
1
Attachment: 2. Diaz Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
2
Attachment: 2. Diaz Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
3
Attachment: 2. Diaz Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
4
Attachment: 2. Diaz Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
5
Attachment: 2. Diaz Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
6
Attachment: 3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
7
Attachment: 3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
8
Attachment: 3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
2
9
9
Attachment: 3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
0
Attachment: 3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
1
Attachment: 3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
2
Attachment: 3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
3
Attachment: 3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
4
Attachment: 3. Gayle Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
5
Attachment: 4. Lee Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
6
Attachment: 4. Lee Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
7
Attachment: 4. Lee Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
8
Attachment: 4. Lee Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
0
9
Attachment: 4. Lee Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
0
Attachment: 4. Lee Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
1
Attachment: 4. Lee Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
d
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
2
Attachment: 4. Lee Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
3
Attachment: 5. Shin Quarry Lane Team Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
4
Attachment: 5. Shin Quarry Lane Team Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
5
Attachment: 5. Shin Quarry Lane Team Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
e
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
6
Attachment: 5. Shin Quarry Lane Team Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
7
Attachment: 6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
8
Attachment: 6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
1
9
Attachment: 6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
0
Attachment: 6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
1
Attachment: 6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
2
Attachment: 6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
3
Attachment: 6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
4
Attachment: 6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
5
Attachment: 6. Huber Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
6
Attachment: 7. Corder Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
7
Attachment: 7. Corder Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
8
Attachment: 7. Corder Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
9
Attachment: 7. Corder Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
7.
3
.
g
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
3
0
Attachment: 7. Corder Utility Box Design Proposal (Utility Box 2018 Art Selection)
Page 1 of 4
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Dublin Crossing Community Park Conceptual Plan
Prepared by: James M. Rodems, Parks and Community Services Director
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approval of the Final Conceptual Plan for the Dublin
Crossing Community Park, including the pump station site and add alternates for the
Valley Children's Museum location.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Dublin Crossing Community Park Final Conceptual Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Based on the Final Conceptual Plan, Dublin Crossing Community Park is estimated at
$21.4 million, excluding the add alternate options for the Valley Children’s Museum site.
Staff will include the final cost estimates and City related expenditures for the Park in
the upcoming Five-Year Capital Improvement Program. As part of the Development
Agreement with Dublin Crossing, LLC, the City is responsible for costs that exceed its
defined contribution of $12.85 million. The City’s funding will come from the Public
Facility Fee Funds.
DESCRIPTION:
On June 17, 2014, the City Council appointed a Task Force comprised of 15 community
members as well as representation from the Parks and Community Services
Commission, Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission, Senior Center Advisory
Committee, Youth Advisory Committee, City Historian, Valley Children’s Museum,
Dublin Little League, Dublin United Soccer, SunCal Development, Alameda County
Surplus Property Authority and Camp Parks Garrison Command. The purpose of the
Task Force was to provide input on the preparation of the 30-acre Dublin Crossing
Community Park Master Plan. The community park will be centrally located in Dublin at
the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and the future Scarlett Drive extension on a portion
of the current Camp Parks property.
7.4
Packet Pg. 331
Page 2 of 4
On November 15, 2016, the City Council approved the Dublin Crossing Park Master
Plan, which was prepared SWA Consultants. The Plan included cost estimates for the
included amenities (detailed in the table below) and estimated those costs to be
approximately $21.6 million, which was in line with the capital budget for the Project. It
should be noted that the capital budget for the Project had approximately $2.5 million of
unidentified funding needs, which would come from Public Facility Fee funds should
cost savings not materialize.
On May 16, 2017, the City Council amended its Development Agreement with Dublin
Crossing, LLC to have the Developer (Brookfield Residential) construct the park
anticipating that the Developer would be able to identify some cost savings to offset the
$2.5 million funding gap. The Developer has spent time working on the construction
pricing for the project and identified that the original SWA budget estimate did not reflect
the current market costs, nor did it capture related costs to execute the Plan as
proposed. The Developer’s estimate to build the park, as originally proposed, would
cost more than $25 million.
Staff worked closely with the Developer to bring the project back in line with the original
capital improvement budget. Doing so meant that certain features or elements of the
Park would need to be changed or scaled back. Staff has provided a list of those
changes (noted in italics) below in relation to what was originally approved in the Dublin
Crossing Master Plan.
Master Plan Conceptual Plan Change
Tennis Courts (X4) Tennis Courts (X2) Decrease by Two
Picnic and BBQ Area Picnic and BBQ Area (X1) Decrease by One
Baseball Fields (60’ X2) Movable Baseball Practice
Backstops (X2)
Feature Change Non-
Permanent
Exercise Trail Station Exercise Trail Station Eliminated
Great Lawn (2 soccer fields
4.2 acres)
Great Lawn (6.9 acres) Increased size (Non-
Permanent Fields)
Riparian Corridor w/Disc
Golf
Riparian Corridor w/Disc
Golf deleted
Eliminated
Civic Plaza and Off the Grid Civic Plaza and Off the Grid
(Open Lawn)
Material Change (Minor)
Tensile Shade Structure
(X2)
Tensile Shade Structure
(X1)
Decrease by One
Basketball Courts Basketball Courts No Change
Neighborhood Playground Neighborhood Playground No Change
Scarlett Promenade Promenade Loop No Change
Pedestrian Bridge Iron Horse Trail Bridge No Change
Large Exercise Trail Station Large Exercise Trail Station No Change
Event Berm Event Berm No Change
Rustic Trails and
Footbridges
Rustic Trails and
Footbridges
No Change
Chabot Pedestrian Bridge Chabot Pedestrian Bridge No Change
Community Garden and Community Garden and No Change
7.4
Packet Pg. 332
Page 3 of 4
Master Plan Conceptual Plan Change
Orchard (39 Garden Beds) Orchard (39 Garden Beds)
Community Garden
Loading Zone
Community Garden
Loading Zone
No Change
Adventure Playground Adventure Playground (Zip
line; Net Play Obstacle
Course; Hammocks;
Climbing Mounds
No Change
Parent Paddock Parent Paddock
(Hammocks; 2 Horseshoes;
1 Bocce; 2 Badminton
Courts
No Change
Event Lawn Event Lawn No Change
California Native
Demonstration Garden
California Native and
Drought-Tolerant
Demonstration Garden
No Change
Parking Entry and Drop-Off Parking Entry and Drop-Off No Change
Parking Lot (282 Parking
Spaces)
Parking Lot (282 Parking
Spaces)
No Change
Restrooms (X2) Restrooms (X2) No Change
Outdoor Classroom Outdoor Classroom No Change
Iron Horse Trailhead Iron Horse Trailhead No Change
On November 27, 2017, the Parks and Community Services Commission reviewed the
Final Conceptual Plan and recommended approval by the City Council.
Addition of the Kinder Morgan Pump Station Site
One future element identified in the Master Plan was the inclusion of the Kinder Morgan
Pump Station site directly adjacent to the western edge of the Park and east of the Iron
Horse Trail. The City owns the pump station parcel and has been working with the
representatives of Kinder Morgan on its removal. Staff has confirmed that Kinder
Morgan plans to remove the pump station this year, creating the opportunity to complete
this edge of the Park. The cost associated with improving this area is estimated at
$365,000. Staff recommends that the City Council include the pump station site in the
Final Conceptual Plan.
Valley Children’s Museum Site Alternative
The City Council entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Valley
Children’s Museum (VCM) and has set aside a location within the Park for its future
location should they raise the funds necessary to construct the facility. However, should
the funding not materialize, the location is currently programmed to include a standard
turf area. Staff has been in discussions with the Developer to evaluate providing a more
durable area for high traffic use. Those alternatives could include reinforced turf with
concrete pads or the use of decomposed granite and concrete. The costs are
estimated at $201,000 and $112,000 respectively. Staff recommends these options be
included as add alternates in the Final Conceptual Plan.
7.4
Packet Pg. 333
Page 4 of 4
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A copy of this Staff Report was provided to the Developer, Brookfield Residential.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Dublin Crossing Community Park Conceptual Plan
7.4
Packet Pg. 334
CO
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
P
L
A
N
DU
B
L
I
N
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
P
A
R
K
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
NO
V
E
M
B
E
R
2
7
,
2
0
1
7
7.4.a
Packet Pg. 335
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
P
l
a
n
(
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
P
l
a
n
)
DU
B
L
I
N
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
CO
N
C
E
P
T
P
L
A
N
7.4.a
Packet Pg. 336
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
P
l
a
n
(
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
P
l
a
n
)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Edy Coleman Memorial Bench
Prepared by: Tegan McLane, Cultural Arts & Heritage Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider a proposal to install a bench at Heritage Park's Pioneer
Cemetery in honor of longtime volunteer Edy Coleman.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the budget change from the General Fund Undesignated Reserve to cover the
cost of purchasing and installing a bench in Ms. Coleman's honor and direct Staff to
proceed with the purchase, installation, and naming ceremony.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Memorial benches are an unplanned expense. Funds would need to be allocated from
the General Fund to cover the cost of purchase and installation. The cost to purchase a
stone or steel park bench and memorial plaque, including shipping to Dublin, could be
as much as $3,500. Cost for installation is approximately $3,000.
DESCRIPTION:
At its December 5, 2017 meeting, Staff was directed to return to the City Council with a
report on installing a bench at Heritage Park and Museums in honor of longtime
volunteer Edy Coleman.
Mrs. Coleman and her husband, Dick Coleman, settled here in Dublin in 1977 and
raised their family here. Mrs. Coleman was very active in many local community
organizations, including the Dublin Historical Preservation Association, and spent
countless hours volunteering at Dublin's Heritage Park and Museums. Mr. Coleman
deserves credit for recruiting and organizing other museum volunteers to help operate
the facility and lead tours for Dublin school children and other visitors.
Mrs. Coleman's daughter, Jamie Gardea, has indicated that the family shares the City
Council's desire to recognize Mrs. Coleman’s contributions.
8.1
Packet Pg. 337
Page 2 of 2
Staff has identified several possible locations for a memorial bench, including sites
along pathways within the Pioneer Cemetery which would offer a quiet location to rest
and reflect, and two options nearer to the Schoolhouse Museum, which offer a nice
location for volunteers or park visitors to meet up before going into the museum or relax
after visiting.
Staff has researched the cost of various memorial bench styles and recommends either
a steel or stone bench as the most durable and attractive option to complement the
surroundings. A stone bench requires the least amount of maintenance. A steel bench
is a more traditional choice. Staff will select the style that is most versatile and useful
within City of Dublin parks.
Staff recommends that Mrs. Coleman's family be invited to choose from among the
proposed locations for a bench in her honor and that a naming ceremony be
coordinated for some time in the spring at the family's convenience.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
Mrs. Coleman's daughter, Jamie Gardea, was provided a copy of this report.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Budget Change Form
8.1
Packet Pg. 338
Budget Change Reference #:
From Un-Appropriated Reserves X Budget Transfer Between Funds
From Designated Reserves Other
Account Amount
1001.7601.73103 (Improvement - Not Bldg)$3,500.00
1001.7601.64102 (MCE Additional Services)$3,000.00
1/9/2018
Posted By:Date:
As Presented at the City Council Meeting
**********Finance Use Only**********
CITY OF DUBLIN
Memorial bench at Heritage Park's Pioneer Cemetery in honor of longtime volunteer Edy Coleman
REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE
FISCAL YEAR 2017-18
BUDGET CHANGE FORM
General Fund - Historic Facility Opes & Rental
City Council's Approval Required
\\cc-uem\users\carolines\appdata\roaming\iqm2\minutetraq\dublinca@dublinca.iqm2.com\work\attachments\2922 2922
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 339
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
B
u
d
g
e
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
F
o
r
m
(
E
d
y
C
o
l
e
m
a
n
M
e
m
o
r
i
a
l
B
e
n
c
h
)
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Approval of a Banner Program Honoring Military Personnel
Prepared by: Suzanne Iarla, Management Analyst II
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider creating a military banner program to honor active duty
military personnel or military veterans that reside in, or have immediate family in the City
of Dublin.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the Creation of a Military Banner Program.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Sufficient funding is available in General Fund Operating Budget to cover the one-time
and ongoing expenses. In Fiscal Year 2017-2018, the total cost would be up to $11,000
for a program of up to 30 banners. Applicants will be charged $230 to sponsor a
banner. The revenue will offset the cost to fabricate and install the custom banners.
In future years, the annual cost would be approximately $2,000.
In Fiscal Year 2017-2018, the estimated one-time costs would be up to $9,000 to
purchase and install hardware to hang the banners on utility poles and to produce some
generic military banners to compliment the banners honoring individual military
personnel. The City would absorb the cost of staff time to administer the program and
design the banners.
DESCRIPTION:
The City currently has a street banner program. The program is managed by the
Economic Development Division and is intended to help create a sense of place and
vibrancy to commercial areas. The City has a number of different banner designs to
promote the Discover Dublin marketing program, annual events (St. Patrick’s Day,
Alameda County Fair, summer fun, winter holidays, etc. as well as Spare the Air and
commute alternative programs.
8.2
Packet Pg. 340
Page 2 of 3
At the October 3, 2017 Federal and Military Communities Committee meeting, the
Committee, comprised of Vice Mayor Biddle and Councilmember Hernandez, discussed
creating a banner program to honor military personnel (active and veteran) within the
City of Dublin.
At the December 19, 2017 Federal and Military Communities Committee meeting, City
Staff presented the Committee with an overview of the proposed program. The
Committee provided feedback to City Staff and is requesting the City Council consider
approving the program.
Following is a summary of the proposed Program's purpose, eligibility, application
Process and schedule to display the banners:
Program Purpose:
The proposed Military/Veterans banner program is intended to honor active duty military
personnel or military veterans that reside in, or have immediate family in the City of
Dublin. The program would allow for an active duty member, veteran or family
members of either, to purchase a banner displaying a photo of the honoree, along with
their name, rank and branch of service. After the display period, the banners could be
presented to the honoree (or applicant).
Eligibility:
The honoree must be an active duty member or military veteran (Honorably
Discharged) of the United States Armed Forces.
The honoree must be a current resident of Dublin or have immediate family
members that reside in the city.
For the purposes of this program, immediate family members include the parent,
spouse, child or grandchild of the honoree.
Application Process:
The application form will be available online (and in hardcopy upon request). For 2018,
the deadline is proposed to be Friday, March 30. Applications would be processed in
the order received and upon space availability. As part of the application process, the
applicant would be responsible to provide:
Verification of military status
Proof of residency
An official military photo of the honoree that meets the City’s standards regarding
size and image quality
Banner Display:
The preferred location for the banners is along Dougherty Road in the vicinity of Parks
Reserve Forces Training Area (a.k.a. Camp Parks).
Sponsored banners would be displayed between Memorial Day and Veterans Day for
one year. After the display period, banners can be presented to the honoree (or
applicant) at a future City Council meeting or other event.
8.2
Packet Pg. 341
Page 3 of 3
In 2018, City Staff will evaluate offering the option to offer to display a banner for a
second year, at a reduced fee, depending on the popularity of the program and level of
interest by applicants.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The proposed program has been discussed at a number of Federal and Military
Communities Committee meetings. No public comments from community members
were received.
AT TACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving the Creation of a Military Banner Program
2. Military Banner Mockup
3. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Military Banner Program Fact Sheet
8.2
Packet Pg. 342
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. XX - 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * * * *
APPROVING A MILITARY BANNER PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to recognize the contributions by local military
service members to our community and nation through the establishment of a Military
Banner Program; and
WHEREAS, the Program is intended to honor active duty military personnel or
military veterans that reside in, or have immediate family in the City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, the City’s street banner program helps to create a sense of place; and
WHEREAS, expanding the banner program along Dougherty Road near
Parks Reserve Forces Training Area (a.k.a. Camp Parks) will help to connect the community
with the military base and the new Dublin Camp Parks Military History Center.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby approve the creation of the Military Banner Program, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January 2018, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 343
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
B
a
n
n
e
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
B
a
n
n
e
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
)
Conceptual Design for Banner Honoring Military Personnel
12/19/17
Custom elements of
Individual Banner:
Honoree’s Name
Official military
photo
Rank
Branch
“Active Duty”
or “Veteran”
8.2.b
Packet Pg. 344
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
B
a
n
n
e
r
M
o
c
k
u
p
(
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
B
a
n
n
e
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
)
Military Banner Program
PURPOSE:
To establish a Military/Veterans banner program to honor active duty military personnel or military
veterans that reside in, or have immediate family in the City of Dublin. The program provides the
opportunity for an active duty member, veteran or family members of either, to purchase a banner
displaying a photo of the honoree, along with their name, rank and branch of service.
BANNER DISPLAY:
The City will display the banners between Memorial Day and Veterans Day. The Military Banners will be
clustered along Dougherty Road in the vicinity of Parks Reserve Forces Training Area (a.k.a. Camp Parks).
After the display period, banners can be presented to the honoree (or applicant) at a future City Council
meeting or other event.
In future years of the program, staff will evaluate offering the option to display the banner for a second
year, at a reduced fee, based on the popularity of the program.
ELIGIBILTY:
The honoree must be an active duty member or military veteran (Honorably Discharged) of the
United States Armed Forces.
The honoree must be a current resident of Dublin or have immediate family members that reside in
the city.
APPLICATION PROCESS:
The application form will be available online (and in hardcopy upon request). For 2018, the deadline will
be Friday, March 30. Applications will be processed in the order received and upon space availability. As
part of the application process, the applicant is responsible to provide:
verification of military status
proof of residency
an official military photo of the honoree that meets the City’s standards regarding size and image
quality
APPLICATION COST:
The cost to sponsor one banner in 2018 is $230. Payment will not be collected until after the application
has been approved.
QUESTIONS:
If you have questions or need help to complete the application form, please contact
Suzanne Iarla, Management Analyst II
925-833-6650
suzanne.iarla@dublin.ca.gov
8.2.c
Packet Pg. 345
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
B
a
n
n
e
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
a
c
t
S
h
e
e
t
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
]
(
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
B
a
n
n
e
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
)
Page 1 of 6
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Overview of Public Facility Fee Program
Prepared by: Linda Smith, Assistant City Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive an overview on the City's Public Facility Fee program
and provide Staff with direction on the establishment of a Repayment Policy for loans or
advances from the General Fund.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report and provide direction on the establishment of a loan repayment
policy for the Public Facility Fee Program.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
Staff has prepared an informational report on the Public Facility Fee Program to help
answer questions about the impact fee, such as what the program is designed to
accomplish, how fees are collected, what expenses are eligible, as well as provide
a discussion of the current fund balance and project priorities. Additionally, Staff is
seeking feedback on a proposed approach to repay the General Fund for advances
made to the Public Facility Fee Program.
What is a Public Facility Fee Program?
The Public Facility Fee (PFF) is one of the City's development impact fees.
Development impact fees are fees charged to developers for the purpose of paying
all or a portion of the cost of public facilities needed to serve future residents of the
development project. Development impact fees are subject to strict requirements. If
a development impact fee does not relate to the impact created by development or
exceeds the reasonable cost of providing the public facility, then the fee may be
declared a special tax and would then be subject to a two-thirds voter approval. In
addition, the revenues generated from a development impact fee may only be used
8.3
Packet Pg. 346
Page 2 of 6
for the purpose for which they were collected. In the case of the PFF, this means
that the revenues can only be used to fund the proposed public facilities that were
used to justify the fee.
In 1996, the City of Dublin adopted a Public Facilities F ee program as one means
of paying for infrastructure needs due to new development. As part of the Program
adoption, the City developed public facilities plans (Parks and Recreation Master Plan,
Civic Center Master Plan, Library Master Plan, etc.) for public improvements that are
necessary through buildout. The objective is to ensure that adequate public facilities
will be available to meet the projected needs of the City as it grows and to further
ensure that the facilities planned are consistent with the adopted General Plan.
What development impact fees does the City collect from new development?
The City can collect impact fees can to fund many types of public facilities. State law
defines public facilities (Government Code section 66000(d)) fairly broadly. For
example, public facilities can include public improvements such as fire stations,
libraries, sewer plants, traffic improvements, and city administrative buildings, but
does not include schools.
The City of Dublin collects various impact fees including the Public Facility Fee, Fire
Impact Fee, Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee, Downtown Traffic Impact Fee, Tri-
Valley Transportation Development Fee, Freeway Interchange Fee, Noise Mitigation
Fee, Affordable Housing In-lieu Fee (residential and nonresidential) and Dublin
Ranch West and East Side Storm Drain Benefit Districts.
This report focuses solely on the City's PFF Program, which collects fees from new
development to build parks, recreational, and administrative facilities within the City of
Dublin.
Currently, the PFF collects funds to support the development of five facility types:
1. Parks
2. Civic Center
3. Library
4. Community Buildings
5. Aquatics
Within the parks category, the City collects a land acquisition fee and an improvement
fee for the following types of parks:
1. Neighborhood Parkland Fee
2. Neighborhood Park Improvement Fee
3. Community Parkland Fee
4. Community Park Improvement Fee
5. Nature Community Parkland Fee
6. Nature Community Park Improvement Fee
As previously mentioned, various studies and plans provide standards for the amount
or size of the facilities the City needs to have available to provide adequate services
to the population within the community. For example, the Parks and Recreation
8.3
Packet Pg. 347
Page 3 of 6
Master Plan established a standard that for every 1,000 residents, the City will
provide five-acres of parkland to provide sufficient recreational and cultural
opportunities. To mitigate the cumulative impact, a public facilities fee is charged
so that the new development, both residential and commercial, bears its fair share
of the increase in service demands on its facilities.
What are eligible expenditures?
As indicated above, different fee categories have been established to mitigate the
impact of new development on the City's public facilities. The City can use the fees
to design and construct the facilities identified in the program. This includes
construction costs, as well as soft-costs such as staff time for project management;
contract services for design, engineering, testing, etc.; furnishings, fixtures and
equipment; as well as miscellaneous costs such as printing, legal noticing, etc.
What has the program funded?
Since the adoption of the Public Facilities Fee Program in 1996, the City has
acquired 175-acres of parkland, improved 118-acres of parks, built the Senior
Center, Library, Shannon Community Center, and constructed The Wave facility.
What facilities still need to be constructed?
The following list includes the public buildings that either needs to be constructed or
improved and the associated costs funded by the PFF. In the case of public buildings,
one building must be constructed (EGRAC Phase II), while three are improvements to
existing buildings (see chart below). In total, the City must expend $36 million on future
public buildings/space. The City must also acquire an additional 21.5 acres of parkland
with approximately $50 million in anticipated PFF revenue, along with improvements to
more than 58 acres of current and future parkland totaling approximately $42 million.
Public Buildings Amount Funded by Fee
Program
Civic Center: Public Safety Complex $13,512,200
Library: Library Improvements (Phase II) $1,660,000
Community Buildings: Emerald Glen
Recreation and Aquatic Complex (Phase II)
$15,330,000
Community Buildings: Cultural Arts Center $5,600,000
Total: $36,102,200
Public Parks
Neighborhood Park Land $13,168,800
Neighborhood Park Improvements $13,020,955
Community Park Land $26,892,000
Community Park Improvements $36,800,359
Nature Park Land $0
Nature Park Improvements $1,710,324
Total: $91,592,438
8.3
Packet Pg. 348
Page 4 of 6
What is the current fund balance in the Program?
Fiscal Year 2016-17 fund balance in the Program is approximately $16.1 Million. At the
end of the current Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, the PFF will have a fund
balance of approximately $2.0 Million. This does not include the Public Safety Complex
Project as the future repayment from the PFF has not been included in this period.
How are project priorities set?
Project priorities are set by the City Council and are adopted as part of the City's
Capital Improvement Program on an annual basis at a noticed Public Hearing. The
CIP includes projects that Staff recommends for funding and shows the timeline for
when certain portions of a project will proceed. Importantly, it is a funding program
that is designed to be self-sustaining and separate from the City's other sources of
revenue.
What are the City’s current spending priorities in the PFF?
The current Five Year CIP includes several improvements:
Sean Diamond Park (to be completed 2018)
Cultural Arts Center at Dublin Civic Center
Fallon Sports Park Phase 2 (to be completed 2018)
Loan repayment to Dublin Crossing for acquisition of 8.7-acre parkland parcel;
Wallis Ranch Community Park (three separate parcels totaling 10 acres); and
The City’s financial contribution to the developer-built Dublin Crossing Community
Park (8.7 acres improved)
What are the future, remaining projects not included in the Five-Year CIP?
Iron Horse Trail Nature Park (12 acres)
Jordan Ranch Neighborhood Square (2 acres)
Two future 5-acre neighborhood parks planned on Croak Property
Fallon Sports Park Final Phase (14 acres)
Future 7-acre community park planned on Chen Property
Future phase of Emerald Glen Recreation and Aquatic Complex - a 21,000 sf
gymnasium and community building
Full buildout of the Library - tenant improvements to approximately 5,000 additional
square feet
Additional parkland acquisition and improvements needed to meet the City’s overall
acreage requirement (approximately 10 acres, including a Downtown Square)
What happens when the City receives the Public Facility Fees?
Funds received under the PFF program are segregated from the General Fund and
used solely, as required by State law, for the purposes of acquiring and developing new
parks and public facilities. When a developer remits PFF fees to the City, the fees
are deposited into the Public Facilities Fund, for which the balance is reported in the
City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). While the fees collected are
held in this one fund, within the City's accounting system, Staff tracks the receipts
and expenditures of fees by fee category (Library, Civic, Neighborhood Park,
Community Park, Community Buildings, etc.). This ensures at build-out the City can
account for how the fees were spent on the intended facilities.
8.3
Packet Pg. 349
Page 5 of 6
Will the General Fund need to loan funds to or subsidize the Program in the
future?
The short answer is yes. The City adopted its first fee program in 2003 and didn’t adopt
another comprehensive fee update until 2015. During that period of time, the City did
not generate sufficient revenues to fully fund facilities to serve new development. With
the most recent 2017 update, it is estimated that, without adjustments to future facility or
park needs and/or creative solutions, the City’s General Fund will need to subsidize the
Program with approximately $6.7 million.
In terms of loaning funds to the Program, the City’s General Fund is currently
contributing $15 million to the Public Safety Complex, of which $13.5 million, as noted
above in the table, will be reimbursed by future PFFs. The City Council received the $15
million as a Community Benefit Payment as part of the negotiated development
agreement with the Dublin Crossing Project. Additionally, in 2014, the City Council
created a reserve and set aside $6 million to provide any bridge funding necessary to
initiate, fund or complete any of the future projects included in the PFF.
How is a loan different than a "gift"?
It should be noted that, in addition to the anticipated loan, the City Council allocated
$4.8 million as a "gift" from the General Fund to two PFF projects to pay for
enhancements to the EGRAC ($3.0 million towards the natatorium) and Fallon Sports
Park ($1.8 million toward synthetic turf and field lighting for the soccer fields) that
were not anticipated in the PFF program. These contributions were characterized as
"gifts" or "grants" because they paid for enhancements to projects in the PFF and,
therefore, are not eligible for repayment from the PFF in the future.
Loan Repayment Policy - Options
When the City Council was presented this overview in 2015, Staff presented a
recommendation to develop a reimbursement policy to ensure that the revenue that
has been loaned or advanced to the PFF is returned to the General Fund in a
responsible manner because at that time, it was anticipated that a loan would be
necessary in the near term. Between 2015 and today, cash flow into the PFF increased
over estimates which make the loan unnecessary. However, with the anticipated start
of the Public Safety Complex this year, Staff believes it is now prudent to develop a
policy on repayment to the General Fund.
Staff is proposing that the City Council establish an annual repayment policy from PFF
collected. Staff would recommend a minimum of $250,000 annually starting with the
next budget cycle to be adopted in May/June 2018. The policy should offer the City
Council the flexibility to accelerate payments from the PFF should it be necessary to
balance the budget or cover certain General Fund operating expenses. Ongoing
repayments out of the PFF to the General Fund will likely result in a timing delay for
future projects.
Upon receipt of direction by the City Council, Staff will prepare a written interfund loan
policy that will be adopted with the next Fiscal Year Budget.
8.3
Packet Pg. 350
Page 6 of 6
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
8.3
Packet Pg. 351
Page 1 of 7
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Capital Improvement Program - Project Updates and Park Openings
Prepared by: Michael Boitnott, Capital Improvement Program Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive status updates on current Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) projects and upcoming park openings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five-year planning instrument used to
identify capital projects and to establish a budget for those projects. Every year, the
City Council adopts or updates the five-year CIP and includes the Capital Budget as
part of the overall City two-year budget. The Capital Budget includes onetime costs for
projects that may span several fiscal years. The CIP identifies capital improvement
priorities and includes budgets for acquisition, construction, repair, and maintenance of
civic facilities, streets, and parks. The program also covers installation, maintenance,
and upgrades of information technology systems, and the commissioning, installation,
and maintenance of public art.
The current City of Dublin Capital Improvement Program 2016-2021 includes projects
for streets, buildings, parks, and related public art. In the coming months, and in
conjunction with the City’s two-year budget process, the City Council will be considering
a new five-year CIP. Staff will include a discussion at the City Council’s February 3rd
Strategic Planning Session to receive feedback on City Council priorities for current
projects, upcoming projects, and any adjustments to existing projects within the current
CIP. Additions and changes can then be incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2018-2023
8.4
Packet Pg. 352
Page 2 of 7
Capital Improvement Program to be considered in May 2018. This report does not
address the forthcoming CIP process or any potential future projects, but instead
provides the status of current CIP projects and provides a timetable for the grand
openings of several new parks, subject to the City Council’s availability.
Facilities Projects
Public Safety Complex – Police Services Building (CIP No. GI0116):
The project provides for the design and construction of a Police Services Building at the
Public Safety Complex. The existing building, which currently is partially occupied by
the Alameda County Fire Department, will be improved to allow for Dublin Police
Services to move from the Civic Center to the Public Safety Complex. Two ancillary
existing buildings will be demolished, and a new building will be constructed behind the
Police Services wing of the Complex.
Status: Out to bid
Next Milestone: February 6, 2018 – City Council consideration of project award.
Shannon Center Parking Lot Improvements (CIP No. PK0316)
This project provides for design and construction of various parking lot improvements at
the Shannon Center. Improvements include new parking lot surfacing, lighting,
landscaping and irrigation, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) modifications.
Status: Construction is substantially complete.
Next Milestone: Spring 2018 – City Council consideration of project acceptance.
Streets Projects
Dougherty Road Improvements (CIP No. ST0911)
This project provides for the widening of Dougherty Road from four lanes to six lanes
between Sierra Lane and the Northern City limits. The work includes installation of a
new class II bike lanes; 1.4 miles of bike/pedestrian pathway; landscaped median
islands; storm drainage improvements; and new curb, gutter, sidewalk, bus stops,
bioretention areas and landscaping along the easterly side of the existing roadway.
Status: The project is more than 50% completed and the current work activity is
construction of the landscape median islands between Scarlett Drive and the northern
City limits.
Next Milestone: The project is anticipated to be completed in July 2018.
Dublin Boulevard Widening (CIP No. ST1012)
This project provides for the widening of Dublin Boulevard to three lanes in each
direction and the addition of bike lanes from Civic Plaza/Sierra Court to Dublin Court. It
will also include undergrounding existing overhead utilities along Dublin Boulevard.
Status: The undergrounding of overhead utilities is nearly complete. The last remaining
utility to be undergrounded will be completed in the first quarter in 2018.
8.4
Packet Pg. 353
Page 3 of 7
Next Milestone: Advertise the street improvements portion of the project, first quarter in
2018 and anticipate the project being completed 12 months after award of the
improvements agreement of the City Council.
Tassajara Road Realignment & Widening (CIP No. ST0116)
The project provides for preliminary engineering and the development of a precise plan
for the completion of Tassajara Road from North Dublin Ranch Drive to the northern city
limit. Environmental analysis (CEQA) is included in the preliminary engineering phase.
Later phases will include detail design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction. The
roadway segment between Fallon Road and the city limit line will be completed in
cooperation with Contra Costa County.
Status: Draft environmental document and draft precise plan in final staff review.
Next Milestone: City Council consideration of the precise plan and environmental
document – Spring 2018.
Dublin Boulevard Extension (CIP No. ST0216)
The project provides for the design and construction of a 1.5-mile extension of Dublin
Boulevard from Fallon Road to North Canyon Parkway in Livermore.
Status: Preliminary engineering and environmental analysis is currently underway.
Next Milestone: City Council consideration of a precise plan and environmental
document – Spring 2019.
Amador Plaza Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements (CIP No. ST0815)
The first phase of the project provided for the design and construction of bicycle and
pedestrian improvements, including two mid-block crosswalks on Amador Plaza Road
between Amador Valley Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. The second phase of the
project will provide for the intersection improvements at Amador Plaza Road and Dublin
Boulevard, including roadway widening to accommodate an exclusive right-turn lane on
Amador Valley Boulevard onto Dublin Boulevard.
Status: The first phase of bicycle and pedestrian improvements is complete. Design of
the next phase is ninety percent complete.
Next Milestone: Acquisition of right-of-way for the needed improvements at the former
Coco’s restaurant frontage along Amador Valley Boulevard.
Storm Drain Trash Capture Project (CIP No. ST1312)
This project provided for the installation of a storm water trash capture device and
modifications to the existing storm drain system to accommodate the unit at Amador
Valley Boulevard east of I-680 and a second unit at the extension of Regional Street
near I-580.
Status: Project closeout and maintenance period.
Next Milestone: None
8.4
Packet Pg. 354
Page 4 of 7
Annual Street Resurfacing (CIP No. ST0117)
This year’s project will provide for an asphalt concrete overlay of San Ramon Road from
the I-580 off-ramp to the City Limits and Dublin Boulevard from San Ramon Road to
Silvergate Drive. The project will provide for the installation of an asphalt rubber overlay
on San Ramon, repair failed segments of the roadway, install new traffic signal
detection loops and pavement markings, and make modifications to comply with
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Status: Preparing plans and specifications for the project.
Next Milestone: Spring 2018 – Construction Bid Opening. Work is expected to begin in
June 2018.
Amador Valley Blvd/Wildwood Rd/Stagecoach Rd Intersection Improvements (CIP No.
ST0317)
Description: The project provides for the design and construction of vehicle, bicycle,
and pedestrian safety improvements at Amador Valley Boulevard intersections with
Wildwood Road and Stagecoach Road.
Status: Preparing plans and specifications for the project.
Next Milestone: Summer 2018 – Construction Bid Opening. Work is expected to begin
in August 2018.
Citywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements (CIP No. ST0517)
The project provides for various pedestrian and bicycle facilities throughout the City and
includes projects to install curb ramps, repair sidewalks, and pedestrian crossing
improvements such as Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons on public streets. The
project includes design and construction of improvements recommended in the City of
Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, a comprehensive update to the ADA
Transition Plan, and an update of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
Status: Request for qualifications issued for consultants to complete an update to the
ADA Transition Plan.
Next Milestone: City Council consideration of an agreement to update the ADA
Transition Plan – Spring 2018.
Parks Projects
The Wave - Emerald Glen Park Concession Building (CIP No. PK0105)
The project consists of the installation and construction of a concession building at The
Wave facility. The concession will primarily serve patrons of The Wave, but can also
serve park visitors through a secondary service window. City Council approved the
acquisition of a prefabricated concession building on November 21, 2017.
Status: Out to bid for site and utility improvements necessary to accommodate
installation and commissioning of the prefabricated building.
Next Milestone: January 17, 2018 – Construction Bid Opening. Work is expected to
begin early March 2018.
8.4
Packet Pg. 355
Page 5 of 7
The Wave - Emerald Glen Recreation and Aquatic Complex (CIP No. PK0105)
The project provides for the design and construction of The Wave aquatic complex at
Emerald Glen Park. The Wave opened for business on May 27, 2017.
Status: Project closeout
Next Milestone: Spring 2018 – City Council consideration of project acceptance.
Dublin Crossing Community Park (CIP No. PK0115)
The City Council approved an amendment to the Dublin Crossing Development
Agreement that requires the developer, Dublin Crossing LLC, to design and construct
the 30-acre park as phases of residential development are completed.
Status: The developer has completed a concept plan and preliminary budget for the 30-
acre park.
Next Milestone: Early 2018 - City Council consideration of the concept plan and budget.
Dublin Heritage Park Cemetery (CIP No. PK0215)
The project provides for the renovation of the existing Pioneer Cemetery, which may
include improved pathways, renovated plaza area near St. Raymond’s church and
renovated landscaping. On August 15, 2017, City Council directed staff to engage the
Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission to review the Dublin Historic Park Master Plan
and the future projects contained within the Master Plan.
Status: Preparing plans and specifications for the project.
Next Milestone: Summer 2018 – City Council and Heritage and Cultural Arts
Commission consideration of renovation plan.
Sean Diamond Park (CIP No. PK0216)
The project constructs a five-acre neighborhood park including a central gathering point
with lighted rose garden and public art, playgrounds for children ages 2-to-5 and 5-to-
12-year olds, a tennis court, picnic area with shade structure, informal lawn area, grass
volleyball court, restroom building, pathways for circulation and exercise
Status: Construction is near substantial completion.
Next Milestone: Summer 2018 – City Council consideration of project acceptance.
Fallon Sports Park – Phase 2 (CIP No. PK0414)
The project provides for the second phase of improvements at the park which include:
parking for 145 vehicles, two synthetic turf soccer fields with conduits stubbed for future
lighting, lighted 90-foot baseball diamond with scorekeepers’ booth and scoreboard,
restrooms and concession building, group picnic area for 100 people, hardscape and
landscaping, and Fallon and Central Parkway landscape and sidewalk
Status: Construction is substantially complete.
Next Milestone: Spring 2018 – City Council consideration of project acceptance.
8.4
Packet Pg. 356
Page 6 of 7
Dublin Sports Ground Renovation (CIP No. PK0416)
This project included improvements to baseball fields #4, #5 and #6, including the
installation of six new dugout shade structures and benches, three new scorekeeper
booths, trash and recycling receptacles and concrete accessible paving and drinking
fountain for field #6.
Status: Project is substantially complete.
Next Milestone: January 2018 – City Council consideration of project acceptance.
Jordan Ranch Neighborhood Park (CIP NO. PK0514)
This project provides for a Neighborhood Park which includes: shaded playground with
areas for tots ages two to five and youth ages five to 12, group picnic area with tables
and barbecues; open space meadow for informal sports, games and passive activities;
a basketball court; a volleyball court; trail access and a restroom.
Status: Project is near substantial completion.
Next Milestone: City Council accepted the park improvements on December 19, 2017
Clover Park and Sunrise Park – Dublin Ranch Subarea 3 (CIP No. PK0117)
The project provides for the design and construction of Sunrise Park, a 10.75-acre
community nature park, and the adjacent Clover Park, a two-acre neighborhood square.
The Clover park design is being completed by the City and funded by the Developer of
Subarea 3. Sunrise Park is being designed and constructed by the Developer.
Status: Clover Park plans and specifications are complete and have been provided to
the Developer. Developer is finalizing plans and specifications for Sunrise Park.
Next Milestone: Developer to finalize plans and specifications and bid project for
construction - Spring 2018.
Moller Ranch Neighborhood Square (CIP No. PK0118)
The City Council approved a Park Improvement Agreement this year to allow the
Developer to design and construct the neighborhood square on a 1.07-acre site within
the Moller Ranch/Tassajara Hills subdivision.
Status: Developer preparing concept design plans.
Next Milestone: Developer to provide concept plans for staff review.
Park Openings
Upon completion of improvements and prior to official opening of new or renovated
parks, the City Council typically holds a dedication cutting ceremony that can be
attended by the general public. Of the parks mentioned, it is anticipated that four park
dedications will be held in early 2018. The City Manager’s Office is currently working to
identify City Council availability in order to finalize these dates. These events typically
occur on Saturdays to allow for the greatest amount of community participation.
8.4
Packet Pg. 357
Page 7 of 7
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
8.4
Packet Pg. 358
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Volunteer Recognition - Proposed Event and Program Modifications
Prepared by: Taryn Gavagan Bozzo, Executive Aide
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider proposed changes to the City's annual Volunteer
Recognition Event and the City's process for recognizing volunteers in the community.
This item was originally scheduled to be heard at the December 19, 2017 Regular City
Council meeting, and was moved to this meeting by City Council consensus.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the presentation and provide Staff with direction.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
Since 1997, the City has held an annual Volunteer Recognition Event in mid-February
to recognize a Citizen, Young Citizen and Organization who have made significant
contributions toward enhancing the quality of life for residents of Dublin during the
previous year.
To prepare for the event, several forms of outreach are used in December and January
to obtain nominations for the Citizens and Organization of the Year awards. Press
releases are issued, and emails are sent to local agencies/organizations including the
Dublin Unified School District, Dublin San Ramon Services District, City of Dublin Staff,
and local non-profit organizations that have worked with the City in the previous year.
This email, sent on behalf of the Mayor, provides information regarding the event and
invites recipients to nominate individuals and/or non-profit organizations they feel
deserving.
Attached to the email are the current Guidelines for nominations (Attachment 1) as well
as a Nomination Form (Attachment 2) which can be filled out electronically, and emailed
8.5
Packet Pg. 359
Page 2 of 3
or mailed in. A link to the City’s Volunteer Recognition website is also included in the
email so individuals may fill out and submit a Nomination Form through the City’s
website. The nomination period typically lasts one month, closing the Friday before
Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.
Once the nomination period has closed, invitations for the event are distributed to local
dignitaries, City of Dublin executive staff, and City of Dublin volunteers who were
registered the previous year to assist in activities provided by the Heritage Park and
Museums, Police Services, and/or the Dublin Senior Center. Additionally, invitations are
sent to each nominee and their respective nominator.
Over the last four years, it has become increasingly difficult to secure nominations,
although various methods of outreach are used and several organizations and
community agencies are notified more than once over a three-month time frame. In an
effort to continue recognizing the dedication of those in the community in a more
efficient manner, Staff recommends that the City Council consider the following
alternatives to the current program and event:
Replace mid-February Volunteer Recognition Event with a City Council,
Commission & Committee Appreciation Reception . The reception would consist
of welcome remarks by the Mayor (or designee), and a hors d’oeuvres/beverage
hour. For convenience, this could be held before a Commission or Council
meeting in the RMR and would be appropriate timing for potential new/incoming
Commissioners/Committee members;
Recognize National Volunteer Week with an annual Proclamation presented at
first City Council meeting each April;
Recognize two Dublin residents (one adult, one youth) for significant
contributions to the Dublin community in the past year:
o This could be done through Staff working with the Dublin Chamber of
Commerce to develop a process for selecting two Dublin residents for
recognition and formally recognizing them at the State of the City typically
held in April; or
o Staff working to develop a process for selecting two Dublin residents for
recognition and formally recognizing them at the first City Council meeting
in April, in conjunction with recognizing National Volunteer Week;
Continue with quarterly Community Spotlight recognition for local non-profit
organizations; and
City of Dublin Heritage Center and Police volunteers added to the annual
Volunteer Luncheon held at the Senior Center every April.
Overall, Staff believes that the proposed modifications would provide multiple
opportunities to recognize those volunteers and organizations who selflessly give of
their time and to improve the Dublin community.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
8.5
Packet Pg. 360
Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Volunteer Recognition Guidelines for Nominations
2. Volunteer Recognition Nomination Form
8.5
Packet Pg. 361
GUIDELINES
Citizen of the Year and
Young Citizen of the Year
CRITERIA | Applications will be judged on the following criteria:
All nominees must be Dublin residents.
Nominees for Citizen of the Year must be 18 years or older.
Nominees for Young Citizen of the Year must be in 1st – 12th grade.
Nominations should respond to each of the five areas listed below to describe the achievement,
contribution and impact made to the community by the nominee.
Nominations must reflect the actual accomplishment(s) achieved through voluntary service during 2016
calendar year (Accomplishments from years prior to 2016 will not be considered by the judges.)
A winning Citizen or Young Citizen of Year cannot be nominated the following year.
NOMINATION PROCEDURE | The following documentation should be submitted:
• Official nomination form or online form at http://www.dublin.ca.gov/vre/nomination, indicating
whether the nomination is for Citizen of the Year OR Young Citizen of the Year.
• A 500-word (maximum) summary that describes the nominee’s accomplishments based on the five
established criteria listed below. Please note: Accomplishments pertaining to years prior to 2016 will
not be considered by the judges.
• One current photograph of nominee for use at the Volunteer Recognition Event. Digital photographs
can be emailed to taryn.bozzo@dublin.ca.gov.
Please call (925) 833-6650 with any questions.
GUIDELINES
Organization of the Year
CRITERIA | Applications will be judged on the following criteria:
Achievement: The nomination must reflect the actual accomplishment(s) achieved through voluntary
service during the 2016 calendar year (information pertaining to prior years outside the past calendar
year of 2016 will not be considered by judges).
Community Needs: The volunteer community service must address unmet human, educational, health,
environmental, quality of life or public safety needs.
Ongoing Involvement: The voluntary community service must be hands-on and ongoing rather than a
one-time activity, with the exception of outstanding service for short-term crisis situations, or special
projects providing ongoing service that may extend beyond the one-year period.
Nominations should respond to each of the five areas listed below to describe the achievement,
contribution and impact made to the community by the nominated organization.
A winning organization cannot be nominated the following year.
Nominated organizations do not have to be based in Dublin, but must provide services which have
substantially benefitted the residents of Dublin.
NOMINATION PROCEDURE | The following documentation should be submitted:
• Official nomination form or online form at http://www.dublin.ca.gov/vre/nomination.
• A 500-word (maximum) summary that describes the nominee’s accomplishments based on the five
established criteria listed below. Please note: Accomplishments pertaining to years prior to 2016 will
not be considered by the judges.
• One current photograph of the members of the nominated organization for use at the Volunteer
Recognition Event. Digital photographs can be emailed to taryn.bozzo@dublin.ca.gov.
Please call (925) 833-6650 with any questions.
8.5.b
Packet Pg. 364
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
V
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
R
e
c
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
N
o
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
F
o
r
m
(
V
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
R
e
c
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Consideration of Use of Rosenberg’s Rules of Order
Prepared by: John Bakker, City Attorney
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider replacing Robert’s Rules of Order with Rosenberg’s
Rules of Order as the official parliamentary procedure for City Council and
Commission/Committee meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Review the Staff Report and provide Staff direction.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
During the City Council’s Workshop in May 2017, the City Council discussed, among
other things, the need for clarification and compliance with City Council meeting
procedures. A discussion ensued about the potential to replace the current Robert’s
Rules of Order as the parliamentary procedure with Rosenberg’s Rules of Order.
Background:
Meetings of the City Council are governed by Rules for the Conduct of Meetings of
the City Council (“Council Rules”). The City Council amends the Council Rules from
time to time by resolution, with the last amendment (Resolution No. 62-17) occurring
in June 2017. (Attachment 1.)
Section 12 of the Council Rules is “Rules of Debate.” The section concludes by
noting that, unless otherwise specified in the Rules, “’Roberts Rules of Order’ shall
govern the conduct of the meetings of the City Council.” Robert’s Rules of Order are
the most commonly referenced parliamentary procedures and are used by public
agencies throughout the United States. While comprehensive, Robert’s Rules-which
8.6
Packet Pg. 365
Page 2 of 2
is designed for large legislative bodies-can prove to be overly complex for five-
member legislative bodies, like the City Council and the City’s commissions.
Over the last decade or more, cities have looked at alternatives to Robert’s Rules.
In 2003, the League of California Cities first published Rosenberg’s Rules of Order:
Simple Rules of Parliamentary Procedure for the 21st Century as a simplified
alternative to Robert’s Rules of Order designed for smaller bodies. The most
recently revised version was published in June 2011. (Attachment 2.) These rules,
developed by Judge Dave Rosenberg, an elected county supervisor representing the
4th District in Yolo County with over 20 years of experience in chairing meetings in
state and local government, retain the core principles of Robert’s Rules but modifies,
simplifies, and tailors the parliamentary procedures to meetings of City Councils and
similar legislative bodies.
The Rosenberg’s Rules of Order are based on four principles:
1. Rules should establish order.
2. Rules should be clear.
3. Rules should be user-friendly.
4. Rules should enforce the will of the majority while protecting the
rights of the minority.
The replacement of Robert’s Rules of Order with Rosenberg’s Rules of Order would not
alter the City of Dublin’s system for holding City Council meetings. The Rosenberg’s
Rules establish a format for agenda item discussion; they set forth rules for motions,
debates and votes; and they ensure that courtesy and decorum are maintained during
meetings.
A recent City Clerks Association of California survey revealed that over 40 California
agencies have adopted Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, including the cities of Belmont,
Calistoga, Fresno, Redwood City, Richmond, San Mateo, Santa Rosa and Sonoma.
If the City Council is interested in changing to Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, Staff would
return at a future meeting with a revision to the Council Rules (Resolution No. 62-17). If
the current framework is maintained, Rosenberg’s Rules would be used in those
situations where the Council Rules do not specifically address a particular situation.
Therefore, the City Council may wish to consider whether it desires to make other
changes to the Council Rules concerning the Rules of Debate.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 62-17 Amending and Restating the Rules for the Conduct of Meetings
of the City Council
8.6
Packet Pg. 366
RESOLUTION NO. 62 — 17
ARESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING ANDRESTATING THE RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF
MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, from time to time the City Council amends and restatesthe Rules of Conduct of
Meetings of the City Council, and the Rules were last restated by Resolution No. 09-16; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to amend and restatethe Rules in order to specify the
length of time for public comment, specify the mannerof producingthe agenda, and make other
changes to ensure compliance with applicable law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thatthe Rules for the Conductof Meetings of the City
Council are amended to read as follows in theirentirety:
1. REGULAR MEETINGS
a. Time Regular meetings of the City Council shall be held on the first and third
Tuesday of eachmonth at the hour of 7:00 p.m., exceptthat Closed Session Itemsshall be
held at 6:30 p.m. Whenever theday fixed for any regular meeting of the City Councilfalls upon
a day designated as a holiday, such meeting will be heldat the same hour on the next
succeeding day not a holiday.
b.Place All regular meetings of the City Council shall be heldat the Civic Center,
as designated by Ordinance.
c.Public All meetings of theCity Council shall be open to the public; provided,
however, the City Councilmay hold closed sessions as provided by the laws of the State of
California.
2. SPECIAL MEETINGS
A special meeting may be ordered at any time by theMayor whenever in his/heropinionthe
publicbusiness may require it or upon the written request of any three members of the City
Council. Whenever a special meeting shall be called, written notice of such meeting shall be
delivered personally or by any other means by theCity Clerk to each member of the City
Council and to eachlocal newspaper ofgeneral circulation and radio/television station
requesting notice in writing. Such noticemust be delivered at least twenty-four (24) hours
beforethe time of such meeting as specified in the notice. The noticeshall specify the time and
place of the special meeting and the business to be transacted or discussed. No other
business shall be considered at such meetings by the City Council.
The agenda for special meetings shall contain the information set forth in Section 3.a. - f.
below. At least twenty-four (24) hours beforeeach special meeting, the City Clerk shall post a
copy of the agenda, including the call and notice of the special meeting at the same location
identified in Section 3 below.
Reso No. 62-17, Adopted 5/16/2017, Item No. 7.1 Page 1 of 8
8.6.a
Packet Pg. 367
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
6
2
-
1
7
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
R
u
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
f
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
R
o
s
e
n
b
e
r
g
'
s
R
u
l
e
s
o
f
3. AGENDA
The City Clerk shall, in consultation with the City Manager, arrange an agenda of matters
according to the order of business and furnish each member of the City Council, the City
Manager, City Attorney, and City Department Heads with a copy of theagenda packet prior to
the City Council meeting at least 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting, and 24 hours in
advance of a special meeting, as time for preparation will permit.
The agendaprepared by the City Clerkshall, at a minimum, include:
a. Thedate of themeeting
b. The time of themeeting
c.Thelocation of themeeting
d. Abrief generaldescriptionof each item of business to be transacted or
discussed at the meeting
e. Specified periodof time formembers of the public to address the City Council on
items of interest to the public that are within the jurisdiction of the City Council,
including a statementthat no person may speaklonger than three (3) minutes,
and including language that the City Council can onlybrieflyrespond with
questions, refer to Staff, or place on a futureagenda.
f.A specified section under whichCity Councilmembers and Staff may present
informational only reports.
At least seventy-two (72) hoursbefore each regular meeting, the City Clerk shall post a copyof
the agenda in the Kiosk in front of the Civic Center located at 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin,
California.
The City Clerk shall execute a declaration of posting which shall be filed in theOffice of the
City Clerk.
The City Clerk shall so mark or denote "ConsentCalendar" items on the agenda to identify
those items on the agenda which can reasonably be expected to generate no discussion by
members of the City Council, City Staff or interestedpersons in theaudience. The City Council
shall consider all of the items on the Consent Calendar portion of the agenda at one time by a
vote after a motion has beenduly made and seconded. If any member of theCity Council, City
Staff or interested person in the audience requests that a consent item be removed from the
list, such item shall be taken up for consideration and disposition in the order listed on the
agenda.
4. PRESIDING OFFICER
TheMayor shall preside at all City Council meetings and perform such other duties consistent
with his/her office as may be imposed by the City Council. TheMayor shall be entitled to vote,
butshall possess no veto power. The Mayor shall be recognized as the official head of the City
for all ceremonial purposes.
The Mayor shall preservestrict order and decorum at all regular and special meetings of the
City Council. TheMayor shall stateevery question coming before the City Council, call for the
vote, announce the decision of the City Council onall subjects and decide all questions of
order, subject however, to an appeal of the City Council, in whichevent a majorityvoteof the
City Council shall govern and conclusivelydetermine such question of order. The Mayor shall
Reso No. 62-17, Adopted 5/16/2017, Item No. 7.1 Page 2 of 8
8.6.a
Packet Pg. 368
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
6
2
-
1
7
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
R
u
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
f
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
R
o
s
e
n
b
e
r
g
'
s
R
u
l
e
s
o
f
sign all Ordinances adopted by the City Council during his/her presence. In theevent of the
absenceof the Mayor, the Mayor Pro Tempore shall sign Ordinances and Resolutions as then
adopted.
5. CALL TO ORDER
The Mayor, or in his/her absence, theMayor Pro Tempore, shall take the chairprecisely at the
hourappointedfor the meeting, and shall immediately call the City Council to order. In the
absence of the Mayor or Mayor Pro Tempore, the City Clerk shall call the City Council to order,
whereupon a temporarychair shall be elected by the members of theCity Council present.
Upon the arrival of the Mayor orMayor Pro Tempore, the temporary chair shall immediately
relinquish thechair upon the conclusion of the business immediately before the City Council.
6. ATTENDANCE
Before proceeding withthe business of the City Council, the CityClerk shall enter into the
minutes, the names of the memberspresent or absent. No formal roll call need be taken.
7. QUORUM
A majority of the membersof theCityCouncilshall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business, but a lesser number than a quorum may adjourn fromtime to time. TheCityCouncil
may adjourn any regular, adjourned regular, special or adjournedspecial meeting to a time
and place specified in theorder ofadjournment. If all members are absent from any regular or
adjourned regular meeting, theCity Clerk may declare themeeting adjourned to a stated time
and place. If theCity Clerk does, the City Clerk shall cause written notice of the adjournment to
be given in the same manner as provided for special meetings. A copy of the order or notice of
adjournment shall be posted in the Civic Center Kiosk and other places designated by the City
Council within twenty-four (24) hours after the time of adjournment. Whenever a regular or
adjournedregular meeting is adjourned as provided in thissection, the resulting adjourned
regular meeting is a regular meeting for all purposes. When an order ofadjournment of any
meeting fails to state the hour at which the adjournment meeting shall be held, it shall be held
at the hour specified for regular meetings.
8. TELECONFERENCING
In rare cases and exceptionalcircumstances, theCity Council permits teleconferencing by City
Councilmembers at regular and special City Council meetings. Only one (1) Councilmember is
permitted to attend via teleconference per meeting. The first Councilmember who notifies the
CityClerk of his orher intention todo so will be permitted to attend by teleconference. Only
audio teleconferencing is permitted. Videoconference or any other form of non-telephonic
communication are not approvedforms ofteleconferencingof City Council meetings.
9. ORDER OF BUSINESS
Promptly at thehour set on the day of each regular meeting, the members of the City Council,
City Clerk (or Designee) and City Manager (or Designee) shall take their regularstations in the
City Council Chambers and the business of the City Council shall be taken up for consideration
and disposition in the following order exceptthat, with the unanimous consentof the City
Council, matters may be taken up out of order:
Reso No. 62-17, Adopted 5/16/2017, Item No. 7.1 Page 3 of 8
8.6.a
Packet Pg. 369
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
6
2
-
1
7
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
R
u
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
f
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
R
o
s
e
n
b
e
r
g
'
s
R
u
l
e
s
o
f
Call to Order (Closed Session)
Call to Order & Pledge ofAllegiance to the Flag
Report on Closed Session Action
Oral Communications
Consent Calendar
WrittenCommunications
Public Hearings
UnfinishedBusiness
New Business
Other Business (City Council/Staff Informational OnlyReports/MattersToo Late
for the Agenda)
Adjournment
10. MATTERS TOO LATE FOR THE AGENDA
a.No action or discussion shall take place on any item not appearing on the
agenda for a regular meeting as posted, unless one of the three items below, occurs:
1) TheCityCouncil determines by majority vote that an emergency situation
exists, as defined in Government Code Section 54956.5; or
2) The City Council determines by vote of two-thirds of thememberspresent
i.e. four votes if five members are present and three votes if four members are present), or by
a unanimous vote of the members of the City Council if only 3 members are present, that there
is a need to take immediate action and that the need for action came to the City Council's
attention after the agenda wasposted; or
3) The item wasincluded in a posted agenda for a prior meeting heldnot
morethan five (5) calendar days prior to themeeting at which the item is acted upon and at the
prior meeting the item wascontinued to themeeting at whichtheaction is being taken.
b. When an item not on the agenda is raised by a member of thepublic, theCity
Council may briefly respond, may ask questions for clarification, provide a reference to Staff or
other resources, or request Staff to report back at a subsequent meeting. Furthermore, a
member of the City Councilmay request that the City Council, and theCity Council may, direct
staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.
11. READING OF MINUTES
Unless the readingof theminutes of a City Councilmeeting is requested by a member of the
City Council, such minutes may be approved without reading if the City Clerk has previously
furnished each member with a copy thereof.
12. RULES OF DEBATE
a.Presiding Officer may debate The Mayor or such othermember of the City
Council as may be presidingmay move, second and debate from the chair, subject only to
such limitationsof debate as are by these rules imposed upon all members. He/she shall not
be deprived of any of therights and privileges of a City Councilmember by reason of his /her
acting as the Presiding Officer.
b. Getting the floor Every member desiring to speak shall address the Mayor, and
upon recognition by the Mayor, shall confine himself/herself to the question under debate.
c.Interruptions A member, once recognized, shall not be interrupted when
speaking unless it be to call him/her to order, or as herein otherwise provided. If a member,
Reso No. 62-17, Adopted 5/16/2017, Item No. 7.1 Page 4 of 8
8.6.a
Packet Pg. 370
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
6
2
-
1
7
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
R
u
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
f
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
R
o
s
e
n
b
e
r
g
'
s
R
u
l
e
s
o
f
while speaking, be called to order, he/sheshall cease speaking until the question of order is
determined, and if in order, he/sheshall be permitted to proceed.
d.Privilege of closing debate TheCity Councilmember moving the adoption of an
Ordinance orResolutionshall havethe privilege ofclosing the debate.
e.Motion to reconsider Amotion to reconsider any action taken by the CityCouncil
may be made at any time. Such a motionmust be made by one of the prevailing side, but may
be seconded by any member, and may be made at any time and have precedence over all
other motions or while a member has the floor; it shall be debatable. Nothinghereinshall be
construed to prevent any member of the City Council from makingor remaking the same or
other motion at a subsequent meeting of the City Council.
f.Remarks of City Councilmember A City Councilmember may request, through
the Mayor, the privilege of having an abstract of his /her statement on any subject under
consideration by the City Council entered in theminutes. If the City Council consents thereto,
such statement shall be entered in the minutes.
g. Synopsis of Debate The City Clerk may be directed by theMayor, withthe
consent of the City Council, to enter in theminutes a synopsis of the discussion of any
questioncoming regularly before theCity Council.
h.Rules of Order Except as otherwise provided in this Resolution, the current
edition of "Roberts Rules of Order" shall govern the conductof the meetings of the City
Council.
13. ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
Any persondesiring to address theCityCouncil at a meeting shall first secure the permission
of the Mayor to do so; provided, however, thatunder the followingheadings of business,
members of the public shallhavethe right to address the City Council upon obtaining
recognition by the Mayor.
a. Written Communications Interestedpersons or their authorized representative
may request to address the City Council by writtencommunication on any mattersconcerning
the City's business, or any matters over which the City Council has control. Such written
communication shall be delivered to theCity Clerk.
b.Public Comment on Agenda Items TheCity Council shall provide members of
the public an opportunity to address the City Council before orduring its consideration of the
item. Although members of the public may submit comments in writing, the City Council is not
required to read written comments into the record.
c.Oral Communications — Items Not on the Agenda The City Council shall provide
members of the public an opportunity duringthe "Oral Communications" portion of the agenda
to address theCity Council on any item of interest to the public that is within the subjectmatter
jurisdiction of the City Council.
14. MANNER OF ADDRESSING CITY COUNCIL
City Council meetings are business meetings, and persons addressing the City Council are
expected to conduct themselves accordingly. Each person addressing the City Council shall
stand at the podium and should give, in an audible tone of voice for the record, his/her name
and his/her address, although providing one's name and address is not required. Persons
desiring to address theCityCouncil shall submit a speaker slip, thepurpose of which is to
allow the Mayor to managethe meeting and the City Clerk to produce the minutes, although
the person need not provide his or her name in order to speak. The CityCouncil expects that
remarks will be addressed to the City Council as a body and not to individuals orthe public. No
Reso No. 62-17, Adopted 5/16/2017, Item No. 7.1 Page 5 of 8
8.6.a
Packet Pg. 371
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
6
2
-
1
7
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
R
u
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
f
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
R
o
s
e
n
b
e
r
g
'
s
R
u
l
e
s
o
f
person, other than the City Council and theperson having the floor, shall be permitted to enter
into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the City Council, without the
permission of the Mayor. No question shall be asked of a City Councilmember except through
the Mayor.
On each agenda item, each member of the public shall be given a specified amount of time to
address the City Council during the public comment period, and thetime limits shall be
reasonably and uniformly applied to all speakers, so far as is possible, with the exception of
formal applicants for approvals from the City who will be allotted additional time. Thetime limit
shall be three (3) minutes for each speaker.
Any member of the public who wishes to speak shall submit a speaker slip prior to the
conclusion of the oral staff report on the agenda item. TheMayor, Vice Mayor or a member of
Staff will make a statement at the beginning of the meetingremindingthe public of thispolicy.
15. VOTING
a.Members of the City Council shall vote by a "voice vote" on all Ordinances,
Resolutions and othermatters, unless a roll call vote is required by law or is requested by a
City Councilmember. Silence shall be recorded as an affirmative vote. TheMayor shall
announce the result of the vote. As required by Government Code section 54953(c)(2), the
City Clerk shall record in the minutes the vote or abstention of each City Councilmember
present for the action.
b. The vote on any matter being considered by the CityCouncil may be delayed by
the Mayor until all members of the City Council present for a meeting, and not excused as
herein provided, are present at the City Councildais.
c. A member of the City Council who has a conflictof interestregarding any matter
being considered by theCity Council shall declare the conflict and excuse himself/herself from
participating in the City Council's deliberations and decisions regarding thatmatter.
16. ORDER AND DECORUM
a.By City CouncilmembersWhile the City Council is in session, the members must
preserve order and decorum, and a member shall neither by conversation or otherwise, delay
or interrupt the proceedings or thepeace of the City Council nor disturb any member while
speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the City Council or Mayor, except as otherwise herein
provided.
b.By Persons Any person making remarks or engaging in conduct which actually
disrupts, disturbs, orimpedes the proceedings or the peace of the City Council or disturbs any
member while speaking or refuses to obey the orders of the City Council or theMayor shall be
forthwith, by the Mayor, barred from further audience before the City Council, unless
permission to continue is granted by a majorityvote of the City Council. In order to maintain
the appropriate level of civility in the City Council's businessmeetings, persons are expected
to refrain from making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks and from becoming
boisterous.
c.Enforcement of Order and Decorum A law enforcement officer shall be
designated as Sergeant-at-Armsof theCity Councilmeetings when requested by the Mayor.
He/she shall carry out all orders and instructions given at the City Council meeting. Upon
instruction of the Mayor, it shall be the duty of the Sergeant-at-Arms to remove and bar such
Reso No. 62-17, Adopted 5/16/2017, Item No. 7.1 Page 6 of 8
8.6.a
Packet Pg. 372
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
6
2
-
1
7
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
R
u
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
f
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
R
o
s
e
n
b
e
r
g
'
s
R
u
l
e
s
o
f
person fromthe City Councilmeeting who violates the order and decorum of the meeting.
Violationof the order and decorum of a City Council meeting is a misdemeanor.
d. SmokingSmoking is prohibited at all times in all City-owned facilities.
17. PROHIBITION ON POLITICAL ACTIVITIES
Members of theCityCouncil shallnot engage in political activities related to local, state, or
federal elections during Council meetings. For the purposes of this section, the term "political
activity" shallmean an activity directedtoward the success or failure of a political party, a
candidate for electedoffice, a ballot measure, or a political group. Nothing in this section shall
prevent the City Council from considering whether or not to support or oppose a ballot
measureor state or federal legislation.
18. SPECIAL COMMITTEES/TASK FORCES
All special committees/taskforces shall be appointed by the Mayor, subject to approval of the
City Council.
19. CITY COUNCILMEMBER VACANCIES
When a vacancy occurs on the City Council, in the office of City Councilmember or Mayor, and
the City Council determines to consider filling the vacancy by appointment, the CityCouncilwill
make such appointment only at a meeting at which all remaining City Councilmembers
including the Mayor) are present. This rule shall not preclude the City Council fromcalling a
special election to fill the vacancy or from adopting an ordinance tofill the vacancy pursuant to
Government Code Section 36512 at a meeting at which one of the remaining City
Councilmembers (including theMayor) is absent.
20. PROTESTS
Any City Councilmember shall have the right to have the reasons for his/her dissent from, or
protest against, anyaction of the City Councilentered in theminutes.
21. ADJOURNMENT
Amotion to adjourn shall always be in order and decided without debate.
22. RULES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
A copy of these Rulesshall be available at all meetings of theCity Council for review by the
public.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th
day of May 2017, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Biddle, Goel, Gupta, Hernandez and MayorHaubert
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Reso No. 62-17, Adopted 5/16/2017, Item No. 7.1 Page 7 of 8
8.6.a
Packet Pg. 373
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
6
2
-
1
7
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
R
u
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
f
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
R
o
s
e
n
b
e
r
g
'
s
R
u
l
e
s
o
f
Mk....tvc
r
ATTEST:
6t/l/Vt-P-
City Clerk
Reso No. 62-17, Adopted 5/16/2017, Item No. 7.1 Page 8 of 8
8.6.a
Packet Pg. 374
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
6
2
-
1
7
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
R
u
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
o
f
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
R
o
s
e
n
b
e
r
g
'
s
R
u
l
e
s
o
f
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: January 9, 2018
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Lease and Option to Purchase 12-Acre Site in Dublin Crossing
Development for a School and Park Site
Prepared by: Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider an agreement with the Dublin Unified School District
(DUSD) that would give the District the right to purchase a City-owned, 12-acre site
within the Dublin Crossing project for $1.00 for use as a school/park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the Agreement for Lease and Property Option
Between the City of Dublin and the Dublin Unified School District for the Dublin
Crossing School/Park Site.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The proposed agreement specifies that the District will pay the City $100 for the option
to purchase the property. During the option period, the City will receive an annual lease
payment of $1.00 per year for the lease term (up to five years). If the District opts to
purchase the site, the purchase price will be $1.00.
DESCRIPTION:
The City and Dublin Unified School District (District) have been working together since
2015 to deliver a 12-acre site within the Dublin Crossing project to the District for a
future joint use school/park site.
On February 7, 2017, the City Council received an informational report on the history of
the Dublin Crossing School Site (Attachment 1). At that meeting, the City Council
appointed Vice Mayor Biddle and Councilmember Gupta to serve as the City’s
Negotiating Committee to work with the District on a potential agreement. Over the last
several months, the City’s Negotiating Committee met several times with the District
Committee (Trustees Cunningham and Giannini) to discuss the parameters of an
agreement. The efforts of the City’s Negotiating Committee and the District Committee
have led to this item.
8.7
Packet Pg. 375
Page 2 of 3
The following summary of key terms is not inclusive of every term in the proposed
Agreement for Ground Lease and Property Option - Dublin Crossing, but represents the
major terms of the Agreement:
1. City will lease the twelve-acre site in Dublin Crossing to the District for $1.00 per
year for a five-year period, commencing when City obtains title to the site
(anticipated to occur in approximately Spring of 2018).
2. District will pay the City $100 for an option to purchase the Property, which may
be exercised any time during the five-year lease term, upon the following
conditions:
i) District awards a construction contract for a K-8 school on the Property
as reflected in DSA-approved plans, which plans include a gymnasium.
ii) District provides confirmation of the sources and availability of
adequate financing and an estimated schedule for completion of
construction.
3. If District exercises the option, the purchase price is $1.00.
4. The District will use the Property solely for planning, constructing, and operating
K-8 school facilities inclusive of a gymnasium.
5. The District will use best efforts to seek state funding for acquisition of the
Property, and the City will cooperate with such efforts.
6. Upon their completion, the gymnasium and park and playground facilities will be
available for use by the public under the terms of a joint use agreement to be
negotiated by the City and the District.
The proposed Resolution, with the agreement attached as Exhibit A, have been
included as Attachments 2 and 3, respectively.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
A copy of the staff report has been made available to the Dublin Unified School District
Superintendent.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. February 7, 2017 City Council Staff Report - Overview of Dublin Crossing School
Site
2. Resolution Approving the Agreement for Lease and Property Option Between the
City of Dublin and the Dublin Unified School District for the Dublin Crossing School-Park
Site
3. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Dublin Crossing Ground Lease and Option to Purchase
Agreement
8.7
Packet Pg. 376
Page 3 of 3
8.7
Packet Pg. 377
Page 1 of 5
STAFFREPORT
CITYCOUNCIL
DATE: February7, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor andCity Councilmembers
FROM: Christopher L. Foss, CityManager
SUBJECT: Overview of Dublin CrossingSchool Site andRelatedNegotiations with
DublinUnified SchoolDistrict
Prepared by: Linda Smith, Assistant City Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
TheCity Councilwillreceive an informational reportonthehistory of the Dublin
Crossing school site, including theongoingdiscussions with DublinUnified School
District and providedirection to City Staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the reportandprovidedirection to Staff.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
On November 5, 2013, the City Councilapproved the DublinCrossing SpecificPlan
DCSP) and relatedentitlements. The DCSPincluded the construction of up to 1,995
single- and multi-familyresidential units, up to 200,000square feet of retail, office,
and/or commercial uses, a 30-acreCommunity Park, a5-acre Neighborhood Park, and
a 12-acreelementary school site.
TheDublin Crossing project’s 12-acreschool sitewas intended forusebyDublin
UnifiedSchoolDistrict for a future schoolsite to accommodate up to 900students.
After the project’s approval, it becameapparent thattheDistrict, due to the unavailability
of state bond funds and the state’s failure to authorize Level III fees, lackedthe ability to
fundschoolsites to serve new development. It was alsouncertain whether a new local
bondwould pass, andno other solutions had beenproposed by Governor Brown to
bridge the construction funding gapbetweentheresources localschool districts haveto
build newfacilities toserve growth andthe actual costs to buildnew schoolfacilities.
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 378
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
Page 2 of 5
In late2014, City Staff, in an effort to assist the District, approached SunCaltodiscuss
options for the City to obtain the schoolsite free of charge. At that time, the
Superintendent informed City Staffthatboth the JordanRanchSchool Site and the
Dublin Crossing School Site needed to be open to serve studentsby2018-19and 2019-
20respectively.
After muchdiscussion andnegotiation, SunCal and the City reached an agreement that
would allow the dedication of the future school site to theCity at no costin exchange for
modifications toprojectentitlements andmonetary concessions. The modifications
requiredamendments to the GeneralPlan, the DublinCrossingSpecific Plan andthe
Development Agreement (but theydid not increase the currentmaximum number of
housingunits allowedin the Project).
Inexchange for thededication oftheschool site to the City, the City conceded the
following to the DublinCrossingdeveloper:
Concession What it Means Approximate Value
InclusionofChabotCreek in
Community Park
Netloss of 1.5 acres of
Community Park
3.6 million
Elimination of mandatory
commercial squarefootageat
Arnold Rd. and Dublin Blvd.
Loss of 75,000square
feet andrelatedtaxable
revenueproducing lands
2 million (overa 10-
yearperiod,
minimum)
Removeddedication and
improvement funding
requirement for 5-acre
neighborhood park
Loss of 1acre
neighborhood park to
community
4.5 million
ReducedCommunity Benefit
Payment
Lost revenue to General
Fund
1.2 million
Total $10.3 million
MOUNegotiation andExtension
Immediately followingthe City Council’s approvalofamendments tothe GeneralPlan,
Dublin CrossingSpecificPlan, andDevelopment Agreement, the City Council, on May
19, 2015, reviewedandapproved aMemorandum ofUnderstanding betweenthe City
andDistrictwhich set out the generalterms underwhich the City and Districtwould
negotiate a ground lease onthe 12 -acreschool site. The MOU wasset to expire 360
days after execution.
Thedeal termspresented by Staff wereas follows:
Along-term, as-is, groundlease whereby the Districtwill lease theschool site
from the Cityfor a nominal sum to allow for construction of a schooland jointuse
facilities.
Districtconstruction of a school and jointusefacilities on theleased landby
District.
District option topurchasethe sitefrom the City at fair marketvalue.
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 379
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
Page 3 of 5
Districtmaintenance ofparksite area suitable foruseas a parkand for
recreational programs and services.
Inapproving the MOU, the CityCouncilalso directed Staff to negotiate a “purchase
requirement” as a part of the lease. Thevideo excerptofthatmeeting is attached to
this Staff Report. City Councilmembers expressed the view thatthe Districtshould
purchase the site if statefunds ever becameavailable to do so.
Subsequent to thatmeeting, the City Managerimmediately discussed the purchase
requirement with theSuperintendent toensure it was wellunderstood what the City
Council expected. However, becausethe Cityand Districtwerecurrentlynegotiating
theJordanRanchterms and preparing that item for the CityCouncil and Board of
Trustee actioninlate 2015, the discussion oftheDublinCrossingSchool site was
deferred.
On March 29, 2016, the City andthe District held a Liaison Meeting – which is
comprised of twoCity CouncilmembersandtwoDistrict Trustees – todiscussanumber
of items, includinganupdate on theMOU forDublin Crossing. It was at thismeeting
that the Superintendent broachedthe idea of a 10 -yearoption to leasefor the site and
that a requestwouldbecoming to the City shortly.
Following the meeting, the CityManager spokewith the Superintendent to voice
concerns that the City Council may notbe interested in a long andprotracted, 10 -year
period of time that creates uncertainty about theschool use of the site.
OnApril 20, 2016, the City andthe District held anotherLiaisonMeeting andthe subject
of the MOUwasonthatagenda. Citystaff provided the LiaisonCommittee withan
update onthe City’s positionregarding the Ground Lease and specifically re garding the
requirement thattheDistricteventually purchase the site. Citystaff indicated that the
CityCouncilwouldbeacting onthe extension to the MOU at the May 3, 2016meeting
prior to its expiration.
OnMay 3, 2016, the City Councilextended the MOU term to September 30, 2016and
included the abilityfor the City ManagerandSuperintendent to extendfor an additional
90 days (which was subsequently exercised). Thestaff report had recommended that
theMOU be extended by 18 months, andthe Dist rict requested a shorter periodin order
toencourage the parties toreachagreement quickly.
OnMonday, August 29, 2016, the City Manager and Assistant CityManager met with
Superintendent Boozerand Kim McNeely, ExecutiveDirector of Facilities, to discuss the
history of thisMOUandreview the generalparameters regarding the lease termsthat
the City wouldbeseeking, including a requirement topurchase. Most importantly, Staff
wanted to providethe new Superintendent a fuller accountof why the City offered the
site, whatconcessions the City had to make to obtain the site, what discussions
transpired overthepreviousyear, and highlighting those itemsthat are importantto the
City in the lease agreement.
Prior to the September 30, 2016termination of the MOU, theSuperintendent andthe
City Manager extendedtheterm to December 30, 2016.
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 380
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
Page 4 of 5
In October 2016, the City Attorney, acting as the City’s designated negotiator, formally
submitted the City’s response to theDistrict’s proposed optionto leaseand lease
agreement. The responseproposed a two -year option to lease the site (versus the 10
years proposedby the District), a leaseterm of 55 years, sixacresof jointuse facilities
at the school sitefor park/recreation usesoutsideofschool hours, and a requirement
that the Districtpurchasethe sitewithin fiveyears of operation. To date, the Cityhas
received no response from the District.
On November 21, 2016, the City andthe District held anotherLiaison Meeting where
thesubjectofthe Dublin CrossingSchool Site wasontheagenda. The respective
representatives discussed the City’s purchaserequirement request from the Cityin the
context of the Districtapplying for Statefunds to acquire landsand toprovide any
moniesgiven by the State to the Cityas compensation for the land. The District
positionwas thatthis request for compensation was not discussed or included in the
MOU. City representatives advised them that thishas been a transparent request for
more than a year when theCityCouncil tookaction on the originalMOU and that the
Citywould be opentodifferentways of achieving the City’s objectives from the
purchaserequirement.
InDecember 2016, the Cityand the Districtagreed to extendtheMOU term to June
2018.
AnalysisandOptions to Proceed
Asnotedabove, the City and District haveheld numerous discussions related to the
MOU, much of the time withoutconsensus as to thetermsandconditions of a future
agreement. TheCity is still awaiting a formalresponsetothesubmittal to theDistrict in
October2016.
CityStaff believes thatthepurchaserequirement term is major sticking point between
theDistrict andthe City. Thecurrent positionof the City Council is if theDistrict is able
to obtainfundsfrom the State for the acquisition of that land, the City should be
compensated for the monetary and landuse concessions ithad to makein orderto
deliver the school sitefor District use. Recentstatements by Trusteesmade at District
Boardmeetingsand recently at a City Council meeting suggestthat the District is not
interested in compensating the Cityfor the land. Thus, thenegotiations appear to be at
animpasse.
Staffbelieves thereare two options that the City Council can consider at this time, other
thanawaiting the District’s formalresponse:
1. Deferany discussion or negotiation until theDistrict has concluded its decision
on the futurehigh school site. Thehigh schooldecision, whether comprehensive
or satellite, and its locationand form , will help to clarify funding availablethrough
thelocalbond, available of Statebonddollars, or throughthecollection ofthe
Level III fee available. This wouldinformthe City Council ifthe District has the
financialbandwidth tocompensate the Cityfor the value lost.
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 381
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
Page 5 of 5
2. Establish a Negotiating Committee of the City Council. Appointtwomembersto
serve as a Negotiating Committee and to work with StaffandtheDistrict on
termsandconditions thatwould be recommended to the City Council. Should
the City Council considerthisdirection, theCityCouncilwouldrequest that the
BoardofTrusteesappointtwo of its members as aNegotiating Committee.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
Acopy of this StaffReport has beenprovided to Superintendent Boozer.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. March 17, 2015 - City Council Staff Report re: Dublin Crossing Amendments
2. VideoClip of May 19, 2017 CC Meeting, Item 8.3 Memorandum of Understanding
betweenthe City and the Dublin Unified School District for the DublinCrossingProject
School Site
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 382
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
Of D,
i9f
CITYCLERKf882STAFFREPORT
CITY COUNCIL File #420-30
DATE: March 17, 2015
TO:Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
ir
SUBJECT: General PlanandDublin Crossing Specific Plan Amendment Study Initiation
Request
Prepared by Linda Smith, Assistant City ManagerandKristi Bascom, Principal
Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The CityCouncilwill consider directing staff to proceed with a proposed transaction withSunCalthatwouldresultinthedeliveryofa12-acre site to the City free of charge in exchange for
certain land use changes. TheCity would be able touse the siteto assist DublinUnified School
District in theacquisition and development of a schoolsite withinthe Dublin Crossings Project.
If the City Council directs Staff to proceed with the transaction, Staff would commence a
General Plan and Dublin Crossing Specific Plan Amendment Study to: 1) Incorporate the 1.5
acre ChabotCreek into the Community Park and increasetheacreagedevoted to Medium
Density Residential by 1.5 acres; 2) Re-designate the 13 acre "Mixed Use" site to "General
Commercial/DC Medium-High Density Residential"; and 3) Allow use of the site designated
School" for both school and park purposes. The proposal would not increase thetotal number
of residential units in the Dublin Crossings project area. Theproject willalso involve
modifications to the Dublin Crossing Development Agreement and a minortechnical
amendment to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan boundary to be consistent with the Dublin
Crossing Specific Plan boundary.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
All costsassociated with preparing the General Planand Specific Plan Amendment Study, if
authorized by the City Council, would be borne by the Applicant. If the proposalmovesforward
and the Development Agreement Amendments are approved, the City will forego $1.2 million in
Community Benefit Payments and $2.1 million in park construction funding.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Councilprovide its feedback on the negotiated terms with
SunCal and adopt the Resolution Approving theInitiation of a General Plan and Dublin
Crossing Specific Plan Amendment Study to: 1) Incorporate the 1.5 acre Chabot Creek into the
Community Park and increasethe acreage devotedto Medium DensityResidential by 1.5 acres;
2) Re-designate the 13 acre "MixedUse" site to "GeneralCommercial/DC Medium-High Density
Residential"; and 3) Allow use of the site designated "School" for both school and park
purposes.
Page 1 of 4 ITEM NO. 8.1
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 383
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
Submitted By eviewed By
Community Development Director Assistant City Manager
DESCRIPTION:
Background
Staffs fromtheCity of Dublin and the DublinUnified SchoolDistrict (DUSD) maintain an ongoing
dialogue regarding population growth, particularly in theEastern Dublin, where DUSDhas future
school sites identified to accommodate its growing student population. In fall 2015, DUSDwill
open Amador Elementary School in the Positanoneighborhood.
The City's General Plan identifies, and DUSD is planning to utilize, two future schools sites: one
located in the Jordan Ranch subdivision and one located in thefuture Dublin Crossing project.
Despite thebest efforts of former State Assemblywoman JoanBuchanan last year, a state ballot
measure for school construction was notplaced on theNovember 2014ballot, andno solutions
have been proposed by Governor Brown tobridge theconstruction fundinggap that exists
betweenthe resources local districts have to build new facilities and the actual costs tobuild
new schools. The lack of funding supportfromthe Statemeans that localschool districts, like
DUSD, need to find alternative solutions to the now-brokenStatemodel that has fundedschool
construction overthe years.
Realizing the predicament faced byDUSD, City staff has been workingclosely with the DUSD
staff on potential options and ways for the City to assist in bridging the gap between land
acquisition costs, thecurrentdevelopment impact fee structureset bythe State, and theneed to
provideadequatefacilities for existing students and to accommodate future student populations.
In additionto this proposalwhich will be outlined below, Staff has alsoproposed a framework for
the Cityto provide DUSD a site withinthe JordanRanch subdivision, whichwill be considered
on tonight's agenda. This proposal would likely save DUSD approximately $33 million in land
acquisition costs, which is thecurrent land value for the Existing School Site called E-5; and
would free up both current and futuredevelopment impactfee revenue that could then be used
towards the construction of a new school at this location. In addition, Staff has also been
working on a proposal for the other remaining schoolsite at Dublin Crossing.
City Staff's DublinCrossingProposal
The Dublin Crossing project was approved in November 2013. Theproject allows for the
construction of up to 1,995 single- and multi-family residential units; up to200,000 square feetof
retail, office and/or commercial uses; a 30 acre Community Park; a5-acreNeighborhood Park,
and a 12 acre elementary school site to serve approximately 900 students. Due to the nature of
the land exchange agreement between the developer, Dublin Crossing Venture LLC (SunCal),
and theDepartment of theArmy, it is anticipated thatthe multi-phasedproject will take 8-12
years to construct. According to the project Phasing Planand as identified by SunCal, the 12
acre schoolsite is in Phase 3 of the project and shouldbecomeavailable in 2017.
Unfortunately, based on the Governor's statedposition that school construction bond funding
willnot be authorized by theState, it is unlikely that DUSDwillhavethe ability to acquirethe
Page 2 of 4
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 384
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
WINIONMOI
Dublin Crossing school site in the near term, with a current land value of approximately $36
million.
City staff approached SunCalto discussoptions for the Cityto obtainthe 12-acre school site in
an effort to assist DUSD. It should be noted that SunCal did not initiate thesediscussions, and
SunCal has indicated that they aresatisfied with their existing entitlements as approved.
After discussion and negotiation, SunCal and City Staff havereached agreement on tentative
dealterms thatwouldallow the transfer of the future school site to the Cityat no cost in
exchange for modifications to theentitlements for the Dublin Crossing project. To summarize,
thenegotiated termsrequire amendments to theDublin Crossing Specific Planand the Dublin
Crossing Project Development Agreement in thefollowingareas:
Under the proposal agreedto by City Staff and SunCal, the Specific Plan would be amended to:
Incorporate the 1.5 acre Chabot Creek into the Community Park and increase the
acreagedevoted to Medium DensityResidential by 1.5 acres
Re-designate the 13 acre "Mixed Use" site on the corner of Arnold and Dublin Boulevard
to "General Commercial/DC Medium-High Density Residential", thereby removing the
requirement for boththe 5-acre Neighborhood Park site and a minimum of 75,000 square
feet of commercial development on the site; and
Modify the designation of the 12-acre school site to allow both school and parkuses.
Attachment 1 illustrates the affected parcels in theSpecific Plan area.
Underthe proposalagreedto by City Staff and SunCal, theDevelopment Agreement would be
amended to:
Removethe requirement toprovide construction funding for a5-acre Neighborhood Park
2.143 million);
Remove requirement for the final Community Benefit Payment ($1.2 million); and
Include language related to the no-cost transfer of theschool site. Details of the transfer
will be further described in theamendments to theDevelopment Agreement.
Minor amendments to General Plan Section 2.5 (Dublin Crossing PlanningArea) wouldalso be
needed to ensure consistency with the amended Dublin Crossing Specific Plan. Lastly, a
cleanup item to theEasternDublin Specific Plan will update figures to reflectthe adopted Dublin
Crossing Specific Plan boundary.
Theproposed changes to the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan and Development Agreement will
result in the delivery of the 12-acreschool site to the City without increasing the current
maximum number of housing units (1,995) allowed in the project. Staff wouldpropose, if the
City Council concurs, to ground lease the property to theSchoolDistrict at a price to be
negotiated; and similar to the Jordan Ranch project, operatethe facility as a joint School/Park
site. The agreement terms between the City and DUSDremain to be negotiated and would be
presented for City Council consideration at a futuredate.
The City staff proposals, including the Jordan Ranch proposal and acquisition of the Dublin
Crossing site, have a value to the community of nearly $70 million. The City and DUSD have
had a long standing partnership over the years, howeverthis is the first time that theCity
Council has been askedto consider land use and financial term changes to assist DUSD
through thisunprecedented time.
Page 3 of 4
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 385
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
Staff recommends that the CityCouncilprovide feedback on the negotiated deal terms with
SunCal and initiate a General Plan and Dublin Crossing Specific Plan Amendment Study. A
draft Resolution approving theinitiation of the study is included as Attachment 2 tothis Staff
Report.
If the City Councilopts to initiate theGeneral Plan andDublin Crossing Specific Plan
Amendment Study, Staff will:
1. Prepare amendments to the General Plan, Dublin Crossing Specific Plan, Dublin
Crossing Project Development Agreement, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and will
completetheappropriate level of environmental review.
2. Begin negotiations with DUSD regarding the joint use of the Dublin Crossings school site
anddraft a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Dublin and DUSD
to help DUSD obtain the rights to a site to build a school, at minimal cost, while
maintaining theability of the public touse thesite for parks and recreation programs.
The MOUwill detail the agreement terms for the City Council and the School Board's
consideration at a futuredate.
3. Prepare Staff Reports detailingthe.necessary approvals for a recommendation by the
Planning Commission and consideration by the City Council.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
Public noticing is not required to review a request to initiate a General Plan Amendment Study.
Although notrequired, the City mailednoticesto all propertyowners and tenants within 300 feet
ofthesubject property. A noticewas alsopublished in the Valley Times and posted in the
designated posting places. A copy of this Staff Report was distributed to the Applicant and
PropertyOwner.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Staff recommends that the project be found exemptfrom theCalifornia Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) under Section 15306, Class 6 of the State CEQA Guidelines because initiation of a
General Plan Amendment study, in and of itself, will not result in disturbance to an
environmental resource.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Depiction ofProposed Changes to Dublin Crossing Specific Plan
Land Use Map
2. Resolution Approving theInitiation of a General Planand Dublin
Crossing Specific Plan Amendment Study to: 1) Incorporate the 1.5
acre Chabot Creek intothe Community Park and increase the
acreagedevoted to MediumDensity Residential by 1.5 acres; 2) Re-
designate the 13 acre "MixedUse" site to "GeneralCommercial/DC
Medium-High Density Residential"; and 3) Allow use of the site
designated "School" for both school and parkpurposes
Page 4 of 4
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 386
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
Legend Mixed Use
M DC Medium Density Residential School
M DC Medium-High Residential Park
General Commercial/DC Medium-High Density Residential M Open Space
General Commercial/DC High Density Residential Project Area Boundary Allow use of t e site
d es) nakke '” cho 1", 0.r,bath
c tnerl ar ar[t purees ,
G st
h 1.S acre CHaka t
OPre k dintioifrorri
Dpenpe"
and redceorrrrirrrty
T rC nu to e
o a
Gem""11
N
n N
Increase"acFrSage ftir"
Medium-Density„ ,
Residential by 13 acresi.
Dublin stud.
Change"Mixed Use" parcel
to"General Commercial/
CIO Medium-High Density
Residential"
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 387
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
RESOLUTION NO. xx-15
A RESOLUTION OF THECITY COUNCIL
OFTHECITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING THEINITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AND DUBLIN CROSSING
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY TO: 1) INCORPORATE THE 1.5 ACRE CHABOT
CREEK INTO THE COMMUNITY PARK AND INCREASE THE ACREAGE DEVOTED TO
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BY 1.5 ACRES; 2) RE-DESIGNATE THE 13 ACRE
MIXEDUSE" SITE TO "GENERAL COMMERCIAL/DC MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL"; 3) ALLOW USE OF THE SITE DESIGNATED "SCHOOL" FORBOTH
SCHOOLAND PARK PURPOSES.
APNS 986-0001-001-15 (PARTIAL), 986-0034-002-00, AND 986-0034-006-00.)
WHEREAS, theCityCouncil is considering initiating a General Plan andDublin Crossing
Specific Plan Amendment Study to: 1) Incorporate the 1.5 acreChabot Creek intothe
Community Park and increasetheacreagedevoted toMedium Density Residential by 1.5
acres; 2) Re-designate the 13 acre "MixedUse" site to "GeneralCommercial/DCMedium-
High Density Residential"; 3) Allow use of the site designated "School" for both school and
park purposes; and
WHEREAS, theGeneral Plan and Dublin Crossing Specific Plan Amendment Study
wouldalso include amendments to theDublinCrossingProject Development Agreement and
minoramendments to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan ensure that there is consistency on
all figures betweenthe boundaries of the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan area and the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan area; and
WHEREAS, the initiationrequest has beenreviewed in accordance with theprovisions of
theCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and was found to be Categorically Exempt
under Section 15306, Class 6 of the State CEQAGuidelines; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report wassubmitted outliningtheissues surrounding the request;
and
WHEREAS, theCityCouncil did hear and consider all suchreports, recommendations,
and testimony hereinabove setforth, and supports theinitiation of General Plan and Dublin
Crossing Specific Plan Amendment Study; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that theCity Council of theCity of Dublindoes
hereby approve the initiation of a General Plan and Dublin Crossing Specific Plan
Amendment Study to: 1) Incorporate the 1.5 acre ChabotCreek intothe Community Park
and increase the acreage devoted to Medium Density Residential by 1.5 acres; 2) Re-
designate the 13 acre "MixedUse" site to "General Commercial/DC Medium-High Density
Residential"; 3) Allow use of the site designated "School" for both school and park purposes.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of theCity of Dublin on this
17th
day of March 2015 by the following vote:
AYES:
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 388
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 389
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
Attachment 2: Video Clip of May 19, 2015 City Council Meeting, Item 8.3
Memorandum of Understanding between the City andthe Dublin UnifiedSchool
District for the Dublin Crossing ProjectSchool Site
8.7.a
Packet Pg. 390
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
7
,
2
0
1
7
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
RESOLUTION NO. XX — 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING THE AGREEMENT FOR LEASE AND PROPERTY OPTION BETWEEN THE
CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE DUBLIN
CROSSING SCHOOL/PARK SITE
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2015, the City Council unanimously approved a Memorandum of
Understanding ( MOU) that outlined in general terms an agreement to be negotiated between
the City and the Dublin Unified School District relating to the long term ground lease of a 12-
acre school site on which the District will construct a K-8 school, including a gymnasium; and
WHEREAS, since that time, the City and the District have been negotiating the terms of
the agreement; and
WHEREAS, the parties have reached an agreement whereby the City would grant the
District an option to purchase, rather than lease, the site, which would facilitate the District’s
ability to seek state funding for the acquisition of the site; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of the agreement, the City will have the ability to use the
Gymnasium and playground under a to-be-negotiated joint use agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby approve the Agreement for Ground Lease and Property Option Between the City of
Dublin and the Dublin Unified School District.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to execute the Agreement
and the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute amendments and such other
documents, and to take such other and further action, as necessary and appropriate to carry out
the intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January 2018, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________
8.7.b
Packet Pg. 391
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
O
p
t
i
o
n
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
U
n
i
f
i
e
d
S
c
h
o
o
l
City Clerk
8.7.b
Packet Pg. 392
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
O
p
t
i
o
n
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
U
n
i
f
i
e
d
S
c
h
o
o
l
Agreement for Ground Lease and Property Option - Dublin Crossing
This Agreement for Ground Lease and Property Option – Dublin Crossing (“Agreement”) is
entered into this _____ day of ___________________, 2018 (“Effective Date”) between the City
of Dublin, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Dublin Unified School District, a California
public school district (“District”; collectively the City and the District are the “Parties”).
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to a Development Agreement by and between the City of Dublin and
Dublin Crossing Venture LLC Relating to the Dublin Crossing Project effective November 19,
2013, as amended by Amendment No. 1, effective June 16, 2015, and as further amended by
Amendment No. 2, effective February 9, 2016, Dublin Crossing Venture LLC (“Developer”)
committed to dedicate a twelve (12) net acre school site to the City, and City holds contractual
rights to said school site as a condition of Developer being permitted to move forward with
construction of the Dublin Crossing development (“Dublin Crossing”). This twelve (12) net acre
school site is designated Parcel 27 on Vesting Tentative Map 8150 and is bounded by D Street, G
Street, F Street, and Central Parkway (the “Property”). The Property is further identified in
Exhibit A hereto (“Property”), and a legal description of the Property is attached hereto as
Exhibit B. The City is in the process of obtaining the dedication of the Property from Developer
to the City.
B. Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the District,
dated May 19, 2015, as amended by First Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding, dated
May 3, 2016, and as further amended by Second Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding,
dated December 20, 2016 (collectively, the “MOU”), and in recognition of the District’s lack of
funds to purchase a 12-acre Kindergarten through 8th grade (“K-8”) school site valued at
approximately Thirty Six Million Dollars ($36,000,000) to serve Dublin Crossing, the Parties
agreed to make their best reasonable efforts to successfully negotiate an agreement or
agreements that would result in the City’s lease of the Property to the District for the nominal
sum of One Dollar ($1.00) per year.
C. Pursuant to a Development Impact Mitigation Agreement effective April 28, 2015
(“Impact Mitigation Agreement”), Developer and District agreed that Developer would pay
certain mitigation fees to District to support adequate school facilities to house students,
including those from Dublin Crossing. The Developer’s obligations under the Impact Mitigation
Agreement are expressly contingent on Developer’s dedication of a twelve (12) acre school site
to the City for the purpose of the City’s leasing said school site to District. The value of the
twelve (12) acre school site was included when Developer and District calculated the mitigation
fees included in the Impact Mitigation Agreement, so that the total mitigation included both the
fees and the value of the school site, with the site to be provided to the District in lieu of
additional mitigation fees.
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 393
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
2
2920
D. In order to finance, construct and operate a school and joint use facilities,
including a gymnasium and playground and park facilities, the District seeks to lease the
Property.
E. Upon the City’s obtaining fee title to the Property, the Parties desire promptly to
proceed with the lease of the Property to the District.
F. Upon the City’s obtaining fee title to the Property, the Parties further desire that
the District have an option to obtain fee title to the Property (the “Option”), with such Option
exercisable upon the District’s satisfaction of certain conditions as set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as
though fully set forth herein.
2. Leased Premises. Effective upon City’s obtaining fee title to the Property, City
leases to District and District leases from City the Property.
3. Term. The term of the lease under this Agreement shall be five (5) years,
commencing on the date on which City obtains fee title to the Property (“Commencement Date”)
and ending on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Commencement Date (“Lease Term”).
3.1 Commencement Notice. City shall provide notice to District within five
(5) days of the City obtaining fee title confirming that title has transferred to City (the
“Commencement Notice”). The Commencement Notice, if mailed, shall be sent certified mail,
postage pre-paid, to City at the address indicated below, and shall be deemed to have been
delivered as set forth in Section 29 herein.
4. Rent. District shall pay City as rent for the Property the sum of One Dollar
($1.00) per year (“Rent”), payable in advance on an annual basis. District shall pay City the first
year’s Rent within five (5) days of District’s receipt from City of the Commencement Notice.
District shall thereafter pay City Rent annually in advance on or before each anniversary of the
Commencement Date. District may prepay to City up to five (5) years of annual rent payments.
5. Taxes. District recognizes and understands that the lease contained in this
Agreement may create a possessory interest subject to property taxation, and that District may be
subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. District further agrees to pay
any and all property taxes, if any, assessed during the Term of this Agreement pursuant to
Sections 107 and 107.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code against District’s possessory interest
in the Property.
6. Use of Leased Premises. District may use the Property solely for the purposes of
planning, constructing and operating school facilities and a related joint use gymnasium, which
gymnasium shall be suitable for use by students through and including eight grade, as well as
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 394
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
3
2920
park and playground facilities also available for joint use (collectively the “School Facilities”).
The School Facilities shall be designed to serve K-8. The School Facilities may be used for
other purposes for which a public school site may be used pursuant to applicable State and
Federal law, including but not limited to afterschool childcare and other purposes pursuant to the
Civic Center Act, Education Code sections 38130, et seq., and parking related to all such uses.
7. Construction Standards. All improvements on the Property undertaken by District
or District’s agents shall be constructed or installed on the Property in a good and workmanlike
manner without the attachment of any construction, mechanics, or other liens, and District shall
hold City free and harmless from any liability arising from such liens.
8. Permits. District shall comply with all applicable laws related to the construction
of the School Facilities. District shall ensure that the School Facilities and related improvements
are consistent with any and all federal, state and local requirements applicable to such
improvements. District shall make best efforts to obtain all necessary state approvals for use of
the Property for the School Facilities. In the event that District is unable to obtain such
approvals despite its best efforts due to the condition of the Property, the Parties shall meet and
confer regarding means to achieve such approvals.
9. Maintenance and Operation.
9.1 District shall, at its own expense, maintain the Property during the Lease
Term, including the School Facilities and any related improvements, in a safe condition and in
good repair.
9.2 District shall have the sole responsibility for the maintenance, repair, and
security of the School Facilities and any related improvements and personal property on the
Property, and shall keep the same in good repair and condition during the Lease Term.
9.3 District shall keep the Property free of graffiti, debris, and anything of a
dangerous, noxious, or offensive nature, or which creates a hazard or undue vibration, heat,
noise, or interference.
10. Utilities. District shall pay or cause to be paid, and shall hold City and the
Property free and harmless from, all charges for the furnishing of gas, water, electricity, and
telephone service, and other public utilities to the Property, and for removal of garbage and
rubbish from the Property during the Lease Term.
11. Default by District and City’s Remedies.
11.1 If District is in default, City shall provide District written notice of the
default. Within thirty (30) days after such written notice, the Parties shall informally discuss the
manner in which to remedy the matter efficiently. If District has failed to cure such default
within thirty (30) days after the Parties informally meet and confer, City may, at its option,
perform such duty or obligation giving rise to the default on behalf of District, including, but not
limited to, the obtaining of required insurance policies or government licenses, permits, or
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 395
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
4
2920
approvals. The costs and expenses of any such performance by City shall be due and payable by
District within ten (10) business days of receipt of invoice therefor inclusive of sufficient backup
documentation. In the event of a default which District has failed to cure within the applicable
grace period, City may, after further notice or demand, and without limiting City in the exercise
of any right or remedy which City may have by reason of such default, pursue any remedy now
or hereafter available under the laws of the State of California. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
given that the Property will be operated as a public school, City’s remedies in the event of a
default shall not include the right to terminate the Agreement, so long as the Property is actually
being used in accordance with Section 6 herein at the time of the alleged default.
11.2 If suit shall be brought by City because of the breach of any condition or
covenant of this Agreement, District shall pay to City all expenses reasonably incurred therefor,
including reasonable attorney’s fees.
12. Default by City and District’s Remedies.
12.1 If City is in default, District shall provide City written notice of the
default. Within thirty (30) days after such written notice, the Parties shall informally discuss the
manner in which to remedy the matter efficiently. If City has failed to cure such default within
thirty (30) days after the Parties informally meet and confer, District may, at its option, perform
such duty or obligation giving rise to the default on behalf of District, including, but not limited
to, the obtaining of required insurance policies or government licenses, permits, or approvals.
The costs and expenses of any such performance by District shall be due and payable by City
within ten (10) business days of receipt of invoice therefor inclusive of sufficient backup
documentation. In the event of a default which City has failed to cure within the applicable
grace period, District may, after further notice or demand, and without limiting District in the
exercise of any right or remedy which District may have by reason of such default, pursue and
remedy now or hereafter available under the laws of the State of California.
12.2 If suit shall be brought by District because of the breach of any condition
or covenant of this Agreement, City shall pay to District all expenses reasonably incurred
therefore, including reasonable attorney’s fees.
13. Early Termination.
13.1 During the Lease Term, District may terminate this Agreement upon
written notice to City, if District determines that it will no longer be practical to use the Property
for public school purposes.
13.2 If, during the Lease Term, District shall exercise the Option as set forth in
Section 21 herein, the Lease Term and the terms of this Agreement shall terminate upon
District’s obtaining fee title to the Property from the City.
13.3 In the event of termination prior to the end of the Lease Term pursuant to
this Section 13 and its subparts, the indemnification provisions of Section 16 shall survive the
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 396
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
5
2920
termination of the Agreement in relation to acts or omissions committed by District during the
Lease Term.
14. Cooperation of the Parties. The Parties shall cooperate in District’s efforts to
secure any and all funding approvals from state agencies for development of the Property as
anticipated in this Agreement.
15. Condemnation. In the event that, during the Lease Term, all or part of the
Property or any interest of District in the Property is taken by eminent domain by an government
agency, quasi-governmental agency, or other public body other than by the City, thereby making
it physically or financially unfeasible, as determined by District in its sole discretion, for the
Property to be used in the manner it was intended to be used by District under this Agreement,
District shall have the right to terminate this Agreement effective as of the date the condemning
agency takes possession of the Property. District shall be entitled to the portion of the award
paid attributable to 1) the diminution in value of its leasehold interest, 2) the value of any
improvements made by District on the Property and personal property on the Property, and City
shall receive the remainder of such award, and 3) the lost value to District of the Option.
16. Indemnity.
16.1 Indemnity by District. District shall, at its sole cost and expense, defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless City, and its officials, boards, commissions, personnel, employees,
agents, attorneys, and representatives (hereinafter referred to as City’s Indemnitees”), from and
against any and all liability, obligation, damages, penalties, claims, liens, costs, charges, losses,
and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable fees and expenses of attorneys, expert
witnesses, and consultants), which may be imposed upon, incurred by, or asserted against City or
City’s Indemnitees by reason of any act or omission of District, its personnel employees, agents,
or representatives, resulting in personal injury, bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death to any
person, or damage to, loss of, or destruction of tangible or intangible property, which may arise
out of or be in any way connected with the construction, installation, operation, maintenance,
use, or condition of the Property or District’s failure to comply with any federal, state, or local
statute, ordinance, or regulation in relation to the Property, or with District’s failure to comply
with the terms of this Agreement.
16.1.1 District’s obligations to indemnify City or City’s Indemnitees
under this Agreement shall not extend to claims, losses, and other matters covered hereunder to
the extent such claims arise out of the negligence or willful misconduct of City or one or more of
City’s Indemnitees.
16.2 Indemnification by City. City shall, at its sole cost and expense, defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless District, and its officials, boards, commissions, personnel,
employees, agents, attorneys and representatives (hereinafter referred to as “District’s
Indemnitees”) from and against any and all liability, obligations, damages, penalties, claims,
liens, costs, charges, losses, and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable fees and
expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses, and consultants), which may be imposed upon, incurred
by, or asserted against District or District’s Indemnitees by reason of any act or omission of City,
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 397
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
6
2920
its officials, boards, commissions, personnel, employees, agents, attorneys or representatives,
resulting in personal injury, bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death to any person, or damage
to, loss of, or destruction of, tangible or intangible property, which may arise out of or be in any
way connected with City’s ownership or use of the Property or City’s failure to comply with any
federal, state, or local statute, ordinance or regulation, or with City’s failure to comply with the
terms of this Agreement.
16.2.1 City’s obligations to indemnify District or District’s Indemnitees
under this Agreement shall not extend to claims, losses, and other matters covered hereunder to
the extent that such claims arise out of the negligence or willful misconduct of District or one or
more of District’s Indemnitees.
17. Insurance. The Parties shall cause to be maintained, in full force and effect and at
their sole cost and expense during the Lease Term, the following types and limits of insurance:
17.1 District. Throughout the Lease Term, District shall maintain, in full force
and effect, either (a) comprehensive general liability insurance in commercially reasonable
amounts, but in no event in an amount less than $5,000,000 per occurrence, protecting and
insuring against claims for bodily injury, death, property damage, and personal injury occurring
within or resulting from its operations, including its use of the Property, or (b) a general self-
insurance program covering bodily injury, death, property damage, and personal injury occurring
within or resulting from its operations, including its use of the Property. Any policy of insurance
obtained by District must name the City, its officers, agents, and employees as additional
insureds thereunder, be endorsed to provide that the insurance is primary to and non-contributory
to insurance carried by the City with respect to liability imposed on District under this
Agreement, and contain a severability of interest clause.
17.2 City. Throughout the Lease Term, City shall maintain, in full force and
effect, either (a) comprehensive general liability insurance in commercially reasonable amounts,
but in no event in an amount less than $5,000,000 per occurrence, protecting and insuring against
claims for bodily injury, death, property damage, and personal injury occurring within or
resulting from its operations, including its use of any portion of the Property, or (b) a general
self-insurance program covering bodily injury, death, property damage, and personal injury
occurring within or resulting from its operations, including its use of any portion of the Property.
Any policy of insurance obtained by City must name the District, its officers, agents, and
employees as additional insureds thereunder, be endorsed to provide that the insurance is primary
to and non-contributory to insurance carried by the District with respect to liability imposed on
City under this Agreement, and contain a severability of interest clause.
17.3 Property Insurance. Throughout the Lease Term, District shall maintain,
in full force and effect, fire insurance and a standard “all risk” policy covering all structures and
improvements at the Property and any personal property owned by District located at the
Property. This coverage must (a) contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement in favor of City,
(ii) cover loss or damage to the Property and any District-owned personal property thereon in an
amount of the full replacement value, and (c) include a deductible no greater than $5,000.
Covered perils are to include fire, all risk, vandalism, malicious mischief, and sprinkler leakage.
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 398
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
7
2920
Throughout the Lease Term, City shall maintain its own property insurance covering any
personal property owned by City on the Property.
17.4 Workers’ Compensation and Employers Liability. Both Parties shall
maintain, in full force and effect, Workers’ Compensation Insurance or self-insurance, and
Employers’ Liability Insurance or self-insurance with limits that conform to legal requirements.
18. Hazardous Substance Information.
18.1 District represents and warrants that its use of the Property will not
generate any hazardous substance, and it will not store or dispose on the Property, nor transport
to or over the Property any hazardous substance except for reasonable amounts of cleaning,
office, educational, and landscape substances ordinarily used on school sites. District further
agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City and its officials, boards, commissions,
employees, agents, and representatives from, and remediate the Property from, any release of any
such hazardous substance and any damage, loss, expense, or liability resulting from such release,
including all attorneys’ fees, costs, and penalties incurred as a result thereof, except any release
caused by the negligence or intentional act or omission of City and its employees or agents.
18.2 City represents and warrants that its use of the Property herein will not
generate any hazardous substance, and it will not store or dispose on the Property, nor transport
to or over the Property any hazardous substance. City further agrees to defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless District and its officials, boards, commissions, employees, agents, and
representatives from, and remediate the Property from, any release of any such hazardous
substance and any damage, loss, expense, or liability resulting from such release, including all
attorneys’ fees, costs, and penalties incurred as a result thereof, except any release caused by the
negligence or intentional act or omission of District and its employees or agents.
18.3 “Hazardous substance” for purposes of this Agreement shall be interpreted
broadly to mean any substance or material defined or designated as hazardous or toxic waste,
hazardous or toxic material, hazardous, toxic, or radioactive substance, or other similar term by
any federal, state, or local environmental law, regulation, or rule presently in effect or
promulgated in the future, as such laws, regulations, or rules may be amended from time to time;
and it shall be interpreted to include, but not be limited to, any substance which after release into
the environment will or may reasonably be anticipated to cause sickness, death, or disease.
19. Holding Over. Any holding over after the expiration of the Lease Term shall be
construed to be a tenancy from month to month and shall otherwise be for the terms and on the
conditions herein specified, as far as applicable, except that if the holding over is without the
prior consent of the City, the Rent shall be increased prospectively as of the expiration of the
Lease Term to the fair market value of the leasehold interest.
20. Acceptance of Premises. By taking possession of the Property, District accepts
the Property in the condition existing as of the Commencement Date. City makes no
representation or warranty as to the condition of the Property, and City shall not be liable for any
latent or patent defect in the Property, except as otherwise stated herein.
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 399
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
8
2920
21. Option to Purchase. In addition to all other rights that District has under the
Agreement, City grants District an Option to purchase the Property on the following terms and
conditions:
21.1 Option Consideration. In consideration of granting the Option to District,
District shall pay directly to City One Hundred Dollars ($100) at the same time that District
makes its first Rent payment to City.
21.2 Purchase Price. The purchase price to be paid by District (“Purchase
Price”) for the Property upon exercise of the Option shall be One Dollar ($1.00), which shall be
paid directly by District to City.
21.3 Term of Option. Subject to the contingencies set forth herein, District
shall have the right to exercise the Option at any time during the Lease Term. Upon termination
of the Lease Term, if District has not exercised the Option, City shall be released from all
obligations under the Option.
21.4 Exercise of Option. The Option shall be exercised by District by mailing
or delivering a written notice of intent (“Exercise Notice”) to City prior to the end of the Lease
Term in compliance with Section 29 herein. It is a condition to the effectiveness of the exercise
of Option that District not then be in default under this Agreement. If District is in default under
this Agreement at the time District gives the Exercise Notice, the Notice shall be void. It is
acknowledged and agreed that simultaneously with delivering the Exercise Notice, District shall
execute a purchase and sale agreement with City (“Purchase and Sale Agreement”), in a form
mutually acceptable to City and District, under which District shall purchase the Property. The
Purchase and Sale Agreement shall not be effective for any purpose unless District timely and
effectively delivers the Exercise Notice. City shall execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement
and deliver the executed Purchase and Sale Agreement to the Escrow Agent, as defined below,
within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Exercise Notice and the Purchase and Sale Agreement
from District. To the extent of any inconsistencies between the Purchase and Sale Agreement
and the Option, the Option shall prevail.
21.5 Escrow. Promptly after District’s delivery of the Exercise Notice, and in
no event later than seven (7) days after such delivery, the Parties shall open an escrow account
with a mutually agreeable escrow agent (“Escrow Agent”) in order to consummate the Option
and the purchase of the Property by District.
21.6 Exercise Notice. The Exercise Notice, if mailed, shall be sent certified
mail, postage pre-paid, to City at the address indicated below, and shall be deemed to have been
delivered as set forth in Section 29 herein.
21.7 Conveyance by City. If the Option is exercised, City shall convey title to
the Property by grant deed.
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 400
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
9
2920
21.8 State Funding. In the event the District exercises the Option, the District
shall promptly seek state funding for acquisition of the Property, to the extent legally allowed. If
the District determines that it is not legally allowed to obtain state funding for the acquisition of
the Property, its legal counsel shall provide the City with a detailed explanation of the basis for
its determination to the City Attorney. Any such state funding shall be paid to City promptly
following District’s receipt of said funding. The Parties acknowledge that the use of state
funding in connection with the acquisition of the Property may give rise to an audit by the Office
of Public School Construction, State Allocation Board or other state agency (any and all such
entities constitute the “Auditing Agency”) pursuant to Title 2, Section 1859.106 of the California
Code of Regulations or other applicable law (the “Audit”). The Parties shall cooperate in
responding to any such Audit. In the event that the Audit results in District being required to
surrender or reimburse to the state all or any portion of the state funding actually received for
acquisition of the Property, City shall promptly reimburse District for the amount District is
required to surrender or reimburse to the state.
21.9 Conditions Precedent to District’s Exercise of Option. Prior to exercise of
the Option, the District shall provide evidence to the City Manager that indicates District has
satisfied the following requirements:
21.9.1 Award of a contract for commencement of construction of a K-8
school on the Property as reflected in DSA-approved construction plans, with such plans
inclusive of a gymnasium appropriate for use by students through and including 8th grade
(“Gymnasium”). The K-8 school may be constructed in phases; the contract required for
exercise of the Option must include at least the first phase of such construction, inclusive of
classroom space. The Gymnasium and park and playground facilities, following District’s
completion of construction, shall be subject to the Parties’ joint use. The Parties shall negotiate
in good faith an agreement on the terms of such joint use.
21.9.2 Written confirmation, approved by the District Board of Trustees,
of the sources and availability of adequate financing to construct the first phase of the K-8 school
along with the estimated schedule for completion of the work.
21.9.3 In the event the conditions precedent to the exercise of the Option
set forth in this Agreement or any other term of this Agreement would result in the inability to
apply for or obtain state funding for either or both site acquisition and/or construction under then
applicable state law or regulations, the Parties shall meet and confer and shall negotiate any
amendment to this Agreement as necessary to adjust the conditions precedent or other terms of
the Agreement so as to allow for the potential receipt of state funding.
21.10 Disposition of Leased Premises. During the Lease Term, City shall not
dispose of the Property through sale or by any other means to any party other than District.
22. Non-Waiver. No waiver of any default under this Agreement shall constitute or
operate as a waiver of any subsequent default hereunder, and no delay, failure, or omission in
exercising or enforcing any right, privilege, or option under this Agreement shall constitute a
waiver, abandonment, or relinquishment thereof, or prohibit or prevent any election under or
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 401
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
10
2920
enforcement or exercise of any right, privilege, or option hereunder. No waiver of any provision
hereof by City or District shall be deemed to have been made unless and until such waiver shall
have been reduced to writing and signed by City or District, as applicable. The receipt by City of
Rent with knowledge of any default under this Agreement shall not constitute or operate as a
waiver of such default.
23. Covenants Run with Land. Upon City’s obtaining fee title to the Property, the
agreements, covenants, and conditions in this Agreement shall be deemed to be covenants
running with the land, and shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and
their respective successors and assigns.
24. Construction. This Agreement shall not be construed as if it had been prepared by
one of the Parties, but rather as if both Parties had prepared it.
25. Further Assurances. Whenever requested to do so by the other party, each party
shall execute, acknowledge, and deliver any further conveyances, agreements, confirmations,
satisfaction, releases, powers of attorney, instruments of further assurance, approvals, consents,
and any further instruments and documents as may be necessary or property to complete any
conveyances, transfers, sales, or agreements contemplated by this Agreement. Each party also
agrees to do any other acts to execute, acknowledge, and deliver any documents requested to
carry out the intent and purpose of this Agreement.
26. Third-Party Rights. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to
confer upon any person, other than the parties and their respective successors and assigns, any
rights or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement.
27. Integration. This Agreement and the attached exhibits contain the entire
agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter of the Property, and this Agreement
expressly supersedes all previous or contemporaneous agreements, understandings,
representations, or statements between the Parties regarding those matters, including but not
limited to the MOU.
28. Amendment. This Agreement may only be amended or altered, by an instrument
in writing executed by City and District.
28.1 Non-Material Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement which
do not related to (a) the Lease Term; (b) changes in the permitted uses of the Property as
provided in Section 6 that would materially alter the impacts that the use of the Property have on
the community; (c) changes that would cause either party to incur material increases in costs; (d)
material changes in the insurance and indemnity provisions as provided in Sections 16, 17 and
18; or (e) material changes to the Option and related conditions set forth in Section 21 and its
subparts, may be approved by the District’s Superintendent and by the City’s City Manager and
shall not, except to the extent otherwise required by law, approval by City Council or by the
District Board of Education before the parties may execute an amendment hereto. The City
Manager shall determine whether an item is “material” for the City, and the Superintendent shall
determine whether an item is “material” for the District.
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 402
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
11
2920
29. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications hereunder
shall be in writing and shall be deemed give if personally delivered, delivered by overnight
delivery service or mailed, via certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following addresses:
If to City, to: City Manager
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
With a copy to: John Bakker, Esq.
City Attorney
Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson
555 12th Street, Suite 1500
Oakland, CA 94607
If to District, to: Superintendent
Dublin Unified School District
7471 Larkdale Avenue
Dublin, CA 94568
With a copy to: Harold M. Freiman, Esq.
Lozano Smith
2001 N. Main Street, Suite 500
Walnut Creek, CA 94111
Any notice given by personal delivery shall be effective upon receipt. Any notice given by
overnight delivery shall be effective the day after delivery to the overnight delivery service
carrier. Any notice given by mail shall be effective five (5) days after deposit with the U.S.
Postal Service.
30. Relationship to other Development. In addition to serving students generated by
Dublin Crossing, the school to be located on the Property will assist with generating District-
wide capacity for the District to serve K-8 students generated by a 499 unit multifamily housing
development currently proposed by The Morley Bros./Bayview Development Group on an 8.53
acre property at 6700 Golden Gate Drive between St. Patrick Way and I-580 in Dublin.
31. Negotiations with Developers. The District will make its best efforts to negotiate
an agreement as soon as reasonably practicable with the developers of a mixed-use development
project known as “At Dublin,” proposed for 76.1 acres, on the property located at Tassajara Road
between Gleason Drive and I-580 in Dublin, whereby said developers will contribute to the
planning and construction of future school facilities, including but not limited to the School
Facilities on the Property.
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 403
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
12
2920
32. Assignment. Neither party may assign or transfer their rights under this
Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party; however, each party may allow
use by others of the portions of the Property over which it has control during the times it has
control of portions of the Property.
33. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the Parties, their respective successors, personal representatives, and assigns.
34. Authority. The Parties represent that each, respectively, has the full right, power,
and authority to execute this Agreement, and that the individual signatories below are authorized
to execute this Agreement.
35. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of California.
36. Partial Invalidity. If any term of this Agreement is found to be void or invalid,
such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall continue in
full force and effect.
37. Quiet Possession. City hereby warrants and represents that it is aware of no liens,
encumbrances, or exceptions to property title as of the date of this Agreement that would
interfere with District’s rights hereunder once City has obtained fee title to the Property, and that
City has the legal right to enter into this Agreement.
38. Memorandum of Lease and Property Option. Following (a) the execution of this
Agreement and (b) the City’s obtaining fee title to the Property, either party, at its sole expense,
shall be entitled to second a “short form” Memorandum of Agreement in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit C.
39. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same
instrument. A copy, including electronic copy, facsimile, or an original, with all signatures
appended together, shall be deemed a fully executed agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the parties as of the dates set
forth below.
CITY OF DUBLIN DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
By: __________________________________ By: ________________________________
Name: David Haubert Name: Amy Miller
Mayor President
Date: ________________________________ Date: ______________________________
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 404
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
13
2920
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 405
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
14
2920
EXHIBIT A
Property Description/Map
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 406
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
15
2920
EXHIBIT B
Legal Description of the Leased Premises
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 407
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
16
2920
EXHIBIT C
Form of Memorandum of Lease
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 408
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
17
2920
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF DUBLIN
When Recorded Mail To:
City Clerk
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Fee Waived per GC 27383
Space above this line for Recorder’s use
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR GROUND LEASE
AND PROPERTY OPTION – DUBLIN CROSSING BETWEEN
THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND THE DUBLIN UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT
This Agreement for Ground Lease And Property Option – Dublin Crossing between the
City of Dublin, a municipal corporation (“City”) and the Dublin Unified School District, a
California public school district (the “District”) for the school site in Dublin Crossing (this
“Memorandum”) is entered into this ___ day of ___, 20__, by and between the City and
District. City and District are, from time to time, individually referred to in this Memorandum as
a “Party,” and are collectively referred to as “Parties.”
1. Pursuant to the Agreement for Ground Lease and Property Option in Dublin
Crossing as of ______________________, 20__, by and between City and District (the
“Ground Lease and Property Option”), the Parties have set forth their respective obligations
with respect to District’s lease of certain land from the City for the construction and operation of
a school and joint use park and playground facilities and gymnasium, and further, with respect to
District’s option to acquire fee simple title to said land.
2. The option set forth in the Ground Lease and Property Option must be exercised
by District no later than ____________________, 20__, subject to and conditional upon
conditions set forth in the General Lease and Property Option.
3. City and District have executed and recorded this instrument to give notice of the
Ground Lease and Property Option, and the respective rights and obligations of City and District
thereunder. The Ground Lease and Property Option - Dublin Crossing is incorporated by
reference in its entirety in this Memorandum.
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 409
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
18
2920
4. This Memorandum shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their
respective heirs, successors and assigns, subject however to restrictions set forth in the
Agreement regarding assignment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Memorandum as of the date
first set forth above.
CITY OF DUBLIN DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
By: __________________________________ By: ________________________________
Name: _______________________________ Name: _____________________________
City Manager Superintendent
Date: ________________________________ Date: ______________________________
2889681.8
8.7.c
Packet Pg. 410
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
D
u
b
l
i
n
C
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
G
r
o
u
n
d
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
L
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e