HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 5, 2017 Agenda PacketDecember 5, 2017 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 1 of 5
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
Council Chamber, 100 Civic Plaza DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL
A G E N D A
• Agendas and Staff Reports are posted on the City’s Internet Website (www.dublin.ca.gov)
• Agendas may be picked up at the City Clerk’s Office for no charge, or to request information on being placed on
the annual subscription list, please call 833-6650.
• A complete packet of information containing Staff Reports and exhibits relate to each item is available of public
review at least 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting or, in the event that it is delivered to City Council
members less than 72 hours prior to a City Council Meeting, as soon as it is so delivered. The packet is
available in the City Clerk’s Office and also at the Dublin Library.
CLOSED SESSION 6:30 PM
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: 1 case
REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
3.1. Recognition of Girl Scout Troop 32415
Members of Girl Scout Troop 32415 will be recognized for their achievement in receiving
the Girl Scout Silver Award for community projects.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Present Certificate of Recognition.
3.2. Employee Introductions: Jenny Wiseman and Janet Coles
New City Staff members, Jenny Wiseman, Housing Specialist in Community Development,
and Janet Coles, Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator in Public Works, will be
introduced.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Welcome City of Dublin Staff members.
3.3. Recognition of Dublin Police Services Chief, Dennis Houghtelling
The City Council will recognize outgoing Dublin Police Services Chief, Dennis
Houghtelling.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Present the Certificate of Recognition.
3.4. Public Comment
At this time, the public is permitted to address the City Council on non-agendized items. Please step to the podium and
clearly state your name for the record. COMMENTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with
State Law, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. The Council may
respond to statements made or questions asked, or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the
matter. Any member of the public may contact the City Clerk’s Office related to the proper procedure to place an item on a
future City Council agenda. The exceptions under which the City Council MAY discuss and/or take action on items not
appearing on the agenda are contained in Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(1)(2)(3).
December 5, 2017 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 2 of 5
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the City Council with
one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the City Council who would like an item removed from the Consent
Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor to remove the item.
4.1. November 21, 2017 City Council Special & Regular Meeting Minutes
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the November 21, 2017 Special
and Regular City Council meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the minutes of the November 21, 2017 Special and Regular City Council meetings.
4.2. Agreement with Francisco & Associates for Acquisition, Audit and Administrative
Services for Various City Districts and Property Assessments
The City Council will consider approving an agreement with Francisco & Associates for
acquisition, audit and administrative services for various City districts and property
assessments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving Consulting Services Agreement with Francisco &
Associates, Inc. for Acquisition Audit and Administrative Services, for a not-to-exceed
amount of $200,000 and a term through June 30, 2021.
4.3. Participation in Two Additional Property Assessed Clean Energy Financing Programs
and Approval of the Association of Bay Area Governments' Regional Collaborative
Services Agreement
The City Council will consider joining the Golden State Finance Authority (GSFA) Joint
Powers Authority (JPA) as an Associate Member and permitting City of Dublin property
owners to participate in the GSFA Senate Bill 555 Community Facilities District and
Assembly Bill 811 Authority Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program;
participating in the California Municipal Finance Authority Open PACE Program; and
participating in the Association of Bay Area Governments' member addendum to the PACE
Regional Collaborative Services Agreement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the following Resolutions Consenting to:
1. Inclusion of Properties within the City of Dublin’s Jurisdiction in the Golden State
Finance Authority Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Clean Energy) to Finance
Renewable Energy Improvements, Energy Efficiency, Water Conservation
Improvements, Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure and other Improvements; and
Approving Associate Membership in the Joint Exercise of Powers Authority Related
Thereto;
2. Inclusion of Properties within the City of Dublin’s Jurisdiction in the Golden State
Finance Authority Program to Finance Renewable Energy Generation, Energy and Water
Efficiency Improvements, Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure, and Other
Improvements and Approving Associate Membership in the Joint Exercise of Powers
Authority Related Thereto;
3. Inclusion of Properties within the Territory of the City of Dublin in the California
Municipal Finance Authority Open Property Assessed Clean Energy Programs;
Authorizing the California Municipal Finance Authority to Accept Applications from
Property Owners, Conduct Contractual Assessment Proceedings and Levy Contractual
Assessments within the Territory of the City of Dublin; and Authorizing Related Actions;
4. Approval of Property Assessed Clean Energy Programs in the City of Dublin; and
5. Participation in and Acknowledgement of the Association of Bay Area Governments'
Regional Collaborative Services Agreement, as executed between the Association of Bay
Area Governments and Residential Property Assessed Clean Energy Providers.
December 5, 2017 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 3 of 5
4.4. City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending
September 30, 2017
The City Council will receive an informational report of the City’s investments through the
quarter ending September 30, 2017 including a monthly transaction ledger. The City’s
investment portfolio for this period totaled $218,372,564 (book value) with an average
market yield of 1.51%. As required by the Policy, the City Treasurer (Administrative
Services Director) affirms that the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the
next six months.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
4.5. Authorization to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor
Staff has scheduled six marked Police vehicles for replacement during the current fiscal year
based upon general vehicle condition and history of maintenance and repair expenses. Staff
is recommending the purchase of five 2018 Dodge Chargers for patrol staff and one 2016
Chevrolet Tahoe for the Watch Sergeant vehicle. Comparison pricing has been obtained for
the 2018 Dodge Chargers and Jeep Chrysler Dodge Ram of Salinas presented the lowest cost.
Hubbard Chevrolet was the sole vendor found selling a new 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe. Because
the City Council is waiving the competitive bidding process, the resolution requires a four-
fifths (4/5) vote.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Authorizing Staff to Purchase Five Police Vehicles from Jeep Chrysler
Dodge Ram of Salinas and One Police Vehicle from Hubbard Chevrolet and Declaring
Replaced Vehicles as Surplus Property.
4.6. Authorization to Order Computer Supplies through CDW Government, LLC and MNJ
Technologies
The City Council will consider the use of CDW Government, LLC (CDW-G) and MNJ
Technologies (MNJ) as the City’s primary vendors for computer related software and
supplies for the City’s daily business operations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the City Manager to approve computer related software and supplies purchases
annually through CDW-G and MNJ.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION – NONE.
6. PUBLIC HEARING
6.1. Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3) Planned Development Rezone with a
Related Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review Permit, and Tentative
Map 8437 (PLPA 2017-00036)
The Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing to construct a residential project
comprised of 220 apartment units, and related amenities including a fitness center, pool, roof
top lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parking on an approximately 2.36-acre site located
within the Dublin Transit Center. The proposed mix of residential units includes 122 one-
bedroom units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroom units. The site has a land use
designation of High Density Residential (25.1 or greater units per acre). The application
includes a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2 Development Plan, Site
Development Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437 for condominium purposes. Staff
recommends that the project be found exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code
65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and a take the following actions: a) Waive the reading
and INTRODUCE an Ordinance Approving a Planned Development Rezone District and
December 5, 2017 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 4 of 5
Related Stage 2 Development Plan for the Transit Center Site A-3, APN: 986-0034-009-00,
PLPA 2017-00036; and, b) Adopt the Resolution Approving A Site Development Review
Permit and Tentative Map 8437 for the Transit Center Site A-3 Project, APN: 986-0034-009-
00, PLPA-2017-00036.
6.2. Amendments to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.04 (Encroachments), Chapter 8.92
(Wireless Communication Facilities), Chapter 8.36 (Development Regulations) and
Chapter 8.104 (Site Development Review) Pertaining to Wireless Communication
Facilities Effective Citywide
The City Council will consider amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code related to wireless
communication facilities on private property and within the public right-of-way. This
includes amendments to Chapter 7.04 (Encroachments), Chapter 8.92 (Wireless
Communication Facilities), Chapter 8.36 (Development Regulations) and Chapter 8.104 (Site
Development Review). The proposed amendments are necessary in order to comply with the
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Act), and further clarifies the
regulation of wireless communications facilities located on private property and in the public
right-of-way. The Act restricts local regulation of wireless communication facilities and
provides an expedited permitting process under certain circumstances.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate, waive the reading and INTRODUCE an Ordinance
Amending Chapter 7.04 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Development and
Encroachment Permits for Wireless Communications Facilities, and waive the reading an
INTRODUCE an Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.92, 8.36, and 8.104 of the Dublin
Municipal Code Relating to Development of Wireless Communications Facilities, effective
city-wide.
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – NONE.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8.1. Fallon 55 General Plan Amendment Study Initiation Request (PLPA-2017-00062)
The City Council will a consider a request by William Lyon Homes to initiate a General Plan
Amendment Study for approximately 22 acres primarily located east of the Terrace Ridge
development and west of Fallon Road. The Study would evaluate a proposal to change the
existing General Plan land use designation of the 22 acres from Rural Residential/Agriculture
to 12 acres designated Single Family Residential and 10 acres designated Open Space in
order to accommodate a proposed age-restricted community that would consist of 57 single
family homes.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the Initiation of a General Plan Amendment Study to
Evaluate Changing the Land Use Designation of Approximately 22 Acres from Rural
Residential/Agriculture to 12 acres Designated Single Family Residential and 10 acres
Designated Open Space; OR, adopt the Resolution Denying the Initiation of a General Plan
Amendment Study to Evaluate Changing the Land Use Designation of Approximately 22
acres from Rural Residential/Agriculture to 10 Acres Designated Single Family Residential
and 10 acres Designated Open Space.
8.2. Discussion of Term Limits
At the October 21, 2017 City Council meeting, the City Council agreed to bring back an item
to discuss term limits.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Discuss and provide direction, as needed.
December 5, 2017 Dublin City Council Agenda Page 5 of 5
8.3. Designate Two Councilmembers to Dublin Pride Week Committee
The City Council will consider appointing two of its members to the 2018 Dublin Pride
Week Committee. The Dublin Pride Week Committee plans and prepares the annual spring
event, which seeks to engage individuals and groups in action based activities to help
improve the community.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Appoint two City Councilmembers to the Dublin Pride Week Committee for 2018.
8.4. Selection of Vice Mayor
The City Council’s policy is to select, in December of each year, a member of the City
Council to serve as Vice Mayor for a period of one year. In the absence of the Mayor, the
Vice Mayor would become Mayor Pro Tempore and would assume the temporary
responsibilities of the Mayor.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Determine who shall serve as Vice Mayor for a one-year period.
9. OTHER BUSINESS
Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports
and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234).
10. ADJOURNMENT
This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a)
If requested, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.2, this agenda shall be made available in appropriate
alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. To make
a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office (925) 833-
6650 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Mission
The City of Dublin promotes and supports a high quality of life, ensures a safe and secure environment, and fosters
new opportunities.
Vision
Dublin is a vibrant city committed to its citizens, natural resources and cultural heritage. As Dublin grows, it will
balance history with progress, to sustain an enlightened, economically balanced and diverse community.
Dublin is unified in its belief that an engaged and informed community encourages innovation in all aspects of City
life, including programs to strengthen our economic vitality, and preserve our natural surroundings through
environmental stewardship and sustainability. Dublin is dedicated to promoting an active and healthy lifestyle
through the creation of first-class recreational opportunities, facilities and programs.
2898011.1
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Recognition of Girl Scout Troop 32415
Prepared by: Taryn Gavagan Bozzo, Executive Aide
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Members of Girl Scout Troop 32415 will be recognized for their achievement in
receiving the Girl Scout Silver Award for community projects.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Present Certificate of Recognition.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
Girl Scout Troop 32415 had 11 Girl Scouts working on five separate Silver Award
Projects over the past two years. The Scouts honed their leadership abilities and
project management skills through projects focused on helping others in the community.
Their projects were accepted over the summer and each Scout was awarded the Girl
Scout Silver Award, the highest award available to Girl Scout Cadettes, and the second
highest in all of Girl Scouts.
The following Girl Scouts will be recognized for their achievement: Emilia Withrow,
Christina Herdman, Lauren Han, Amelie Chabot, Ashley Fielding, Aneela Mocherla,
Rachel Wong, Akamai Wong, Juliette Lee, Shivani Naayak, and Snehal Choptra.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
3.1
Packet Pg. 6
Page 2 of 2
3.1
Packet Pg. 7
Page 1 of 1
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Employee Introductions: Jenny Wiseman and Janet Coles
Prepared by: Taryn Gavagan Bozzo, Executive Aide
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
New City Staff members, Jenny Wiseman, Housing Specialist in Community
Development, and Janet Coles, Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator in Public
Works, will be introduced.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Welcome City of Dublin Staff members.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
New City of Dublin Staff members, Jenny Wiseman, Housing Specialist in Community
Development, and Janet Coles, Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator in Public
Works, will be introduced to the City Council.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
3.2
Packet Pg. 8
Page 1 of 1
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Recognition of Dublin Police Services Chief, Dennis Houghtelling
Prepared by: Taryn Gavagan Bo zzo, Executive Aide
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will recognize outgoing Dublin Police Services Chief, Dennis
Houghtelling.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Present the Certificate of Recognition.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council will present a Certificate of Recognition to outgoing Dublin Police
Services Chief, Dennis Houghtelling, for his contributions to the City of Dublin
community.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. None
3.3
Packet Pg. 9
Page 1 of 1
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
November 21, 2017 City Council Special & Regular Meeting Minutes
Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the November 21, 2017
Special and Regular City Council meetings.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the minutes of the November 21, 2017 Special and Regular City Council
meetings.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the November 21, 2017
Special and Regular City Council meetings.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Minutes of the November 21, 2017 Special City Council Meeting
2. Draft Minutes of the November 21, 2017 Regular CIty Council Meeting
4.1
Packet Pg. 11
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
SPECIAL MEETING – NOVEMBER 21, 2017
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1
SPECIAL MEETING
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
Closed Session
A Special Meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, November 21, 2017,
in the City Council Chamber. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM., by Mayor
David Haubert.
1.Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Attendee Name Title Status
David Haubert Mayor Present
Don Biddle Vice Mayor Present
Arun Goel Councilmember Present
Abe Gupta Councilmember Present
Melissa Hernandez Councilmember Present
2.Report on Closed Session
Mayor Haubert stated that there was no reportable action.
3.Public Comment
No public comments were made.
4.Study Session
4.1. Study Session: Saint Patrick Way Residential Development Project (PLPA-
2017-00049)
Eric Morley, Applicant, made a presentation and responded to questions posed
by the City Council.
Dan Cunningham, Dublin Unified School District Trustee, provided public
comment on this item.
Linda Mandolini, President of Eden Housing, provided public comment on this
item.
Mayor Haubert called a recess to the meeting at 6:46 p.m.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 12
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2
SPECIAL MEETING
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
Mayor Haubert reconvened the meeting at 6:58 p.m.
Mayor Haubert called a recess to the meeting at 7:21 p.m.
Mayor Haubert reconvened the meeting at 7:27 p.m.
On motion of Cm. Gupta, seconded by Vm. Biddle, and by a 3-2 vote (Cm. Goel
and Mayor Haubert voting No), the City Council directed Staff to have the St.
Patrick Way Residential Development Project move forward for approval by the
Planning Commission.
5. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:32 p.m.
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 13
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
REGULAR MEETING – NOVEMBER 21, 2017
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
A Regular Meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, November 21, 2017,
in the City Council Chamber. The meeting was called to order at 7:32 PM., by Mayor
David Haubert.
1. Call to Order
Attendee Name Title Status
David Haubert Mayor Present
Don Biddle Vice Mayor Present
Arun Goel Councilmember Present
Abe Gupta Councilmember Present
Melissa Hernandez Councilmember Present
3. Oral Communications
3.1. Recognition of 2017 Inside Dublin Participants.
The City Council recognized the 2017 Inside Dublin participants.
3.2. Receive MTC Awards for Pavement Condition Index Score and Pavement
Management Program
The City Council received the Metropolitan Transportation Commission Award.
3.3. Employee Introduction: Suzanne Iarla
The City Council welcomed the new City of Dublin Staff member.
3.4. The Wave - First Waterpark Season
The City Council received The Wave’s operational season report.
3.5. Public Comment
Mike Grant, Dublin citizen, provided public comment.
4. Consent Calendar
Cm. Goel pulled Item 4.5 for discussion.
4.1. Approved the minutes of the November 7, 2017 Regular City Council meeting.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 14
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
I
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
4.2. Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 140 – 17
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND DUBLIN
UNIIFED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR USE OF THE WAVE OUTDOOR SPORT POOL
4.3. Received the Payment Issuance Report.
4.4. Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 141 – 17
APPROVING A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BADAWI & ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE AUDITING SERVICES
4.6. Approved the Agreement for Legal Services with Meyers Nave and appoint ed Lauren
Quint as Assistant City Attorney.
4.7. Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 143 – 17
AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF DUBLIN TO BECOME A MEMBER OF BUYBOARD AND
PURCHASE A CONCESSION BUILDING FROM THE PUBLIC RESTROOM COMPANY
FOR THE EMERALD GLEN RECREATION AND AQUATIC COMPLEX
(CIP NO. PK0105)
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: Abe Gupta, Councilmember
SECOND: Don Biddle, Vice Mayor
AYES: Haubert, Biddle, Goel, Gupta, Hernandez
4.5 Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 142 – 17
APPROVING A TASK ORDER WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES TO
PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE AT DUBLIN PROJECT
RESULT: ADOPTED [3 TO 2]
MOVED BY: Abe Gupta, Councilmember
SECOND: Don Biddle, Vice Mayor
AYES: Biddle, Gupta, Hernandez
NOES: Haubert, Goel
5. Written Communication – None.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 15
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
I
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
6. Public Hearing
6.1. Schaefer Ranch Lot 70 General Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit to
Amend the Planned Development Zoning, Site Development Review Permit
and Lot Line Adjustment (PLPA-2017-00024)
Mayor Haubert opened the public hearing.
No comments were made on the item.
Mayor Haubert closed the public hearing.
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 144 – 17
APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.35 ACRES
LOCATED WITHIN SCHAEFER RANCH
(APN 941-2834-034 & A PORTION OF APN 941-2832-026) PLPA-2017-00024
RESOLUTION NO. 145 – 17
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT FOR SCHAEFER RANCH
(APN 941-2834-034 & A PORTION OF APN 941-2832-026) PLPA-2017-00024
RESOLUTION NO. 146 – 17
APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR SITE
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN SCHAEFER RANCH
(APN 941-2834-034 & A PORTION OF APN 941-2832-026) PLPA-2017-00024
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: Abe Gupta, Councilmember
SECOND: Don Biddle, Vice Mayor
AYES: Haubert, Biddle, Goel, Gupta, Hernandez
7. Unfinished Business
7.1. Automated License Plate Recognition System Update and Video Technology
Overview
Mike Grant, Dublin resident, provided public comment on this item.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
I
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
The City Council received the Automated License Plate Recognition System
report.
8. New Business
8.1. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Progress Report
Marlene Massetti, Dublin resident, provided public comment.
Cm. Gupta made a motion, seconded by Cm. Hernandez, for Staff to work with
Urban Land Institute (ULI) to look at strategic initiatives to deploy funds for
economic development to achieve the vision of Downtown Dublin.
Mayor Haubert made a substitute motion, seconded by Cm. Goel, to add to Cm.
Gupta’s motion to ask ULI on how to reach out to the public for community input.
The motion failed by a 2-3 vote, with Councilmembers Biddle, Gupta, and
Hernandez voting NO.
The City Council directed Staff to work with Urban Land Institute (ULI) to look at
strategic initiatives to deploy funds for economic development to achieve the vision
of Downtown Dublin.
RESULT: ADOPTED [3 TO 2]
MOVED BY: Abe Gupta, Councilmember
SECOND: Melissa Hernandez, Councilmember
AYES: Don Biddle, Abe Gupta, Melissa Hernandez
NAYS: David Haubert, Arun Goel
8.2. Potential Large Dog Park Discussion
The City Council directed Staff to establish a large dog park at Wallis Ranch.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: Abe Gupta, Councilmember
SECOND: David Haubert, Mayor
AYES: Haubert, Biddle, Goel, Gupta, Hernandez
8.3. Consideration of Communications Protocols with Dublin Unified School
District
Dan Cunningham, Dublin Unified School District Trustee, provided public comment
on this item.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
I
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5
REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 21, 2017
9. Other Business – Brief information only reports were provided by City Council and/or
Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings
attended at City expense (AB1234).
10. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:31 p.m.
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
R
e
g
u
l
a
r
C
I
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
(
D
r
a
f
t
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
1
7
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Agreement with Francisco & Associates for Acquisition, Audit and
Administrative Services for Various City Districts and Property
Assessments
Prepared by: Nancy McDonnell, Management Analyst
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approving an agreement with Francisco & Associates for
acquisition, audit and administrative services for various City districts and property
assessments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving Consulting Services Agreement with Francisco &
Associates, Inc. for Acquisition Audit And Administrative Services, for a not-to-exceed
amount of $200,000 and a term through June 30, 2021.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Approval of the proposed agreement will not impact the General Fund and all services
will be covered by approved operating budgets of the appropriate District. Staff
estimates spending no more than a total of $200,000 over a three-year period for all the
districts and property assessments.
DESCRIPTION:
The City has historically utilized consulting firms for assessment district and fee
administration services. The City’s current consultant, Harris and Associates, has
provided special district services for the last five years. Staff recently issued a Request
for Qualifications (RFQ) for these services, as well as expanded the scope to include
acquisition and audit services for the City's Community Facilities District 2015-1 formed
for the Boulevard project.
Contracts involving the acquisition of specialized services are exempt from the
competitive bidding requirements, pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Section 0253.06.
Instead, selection is based on qualifications, experience and proven expertise. The RFQ
4.2
Packet Pg. 19
Page 2 of 2
process is used to identify consulting firms with the necessary background and
experience to provide services as well as making certain that the cost is competitive.
Three submissions were received, including the City’s current consultant (Harris and
Associates). After reviewing all proposals, Staff determined Francisco & Associates,
Inc. was the most responsive in terms of experience, proximity, and project plan.
Francisco & Associates, Inc. has an extensive client list, including administering
assessment districts for the cities of Brentwood, Concord, Hayward, Sunnyvale and the
Town of Danville. In addition, Francisco & Associates, Inc. has experience providing
audit and acquisition services for CFDs to the cities of Brentwood, Hercules, Lincoln,
Napa, Oakley and San Ramon.
The agreement is termed through June 30, 2021 and is scoped to include services for
the following districts/property assessments:
Community Facilities District 2015-1
Citywide Street Lighting Maintenance District 83-1
Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District 83-2 (Stagecoach Rd)
Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District 86-1 (Dougherty Rd)
Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District 97-1 (Santa Rita Rd)
Dublin Ranch Street Lighting Maintenance District 99-1
EMS (Emergency Medical Services Tax)
Residential Garbage & Recycling Services Fee
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving Consulting Services Agreement with Francisco & Associates,
Inc.
2. Exhibit A to the Resolution, Consulting Services Agreement
4.2
Packet Pg. 20
RESOLUTION NO. XX- 17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
APPROVING CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FRANCISCO &
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ACQUISITION AUDIT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
WHEREAS, Staff prepared and initiated a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for
acquisition audit and administrative services; and
WHEREAS, Staff reviewed and selected the most qualified firm to provide
services; and
WHERAS, City of Dublin wishes to enter into an agreement with Francisco &
Associates, Inc. for a term through June 30, 2021.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Dublin does hereby approve a Consulting Services Agreement with Francisco &
Associates, Inc., as attached hereto as Exhibit “A” to this Resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the
Agreement and make any other minor modifications necessary to carry out the intent of
this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 2017, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
City Clerk
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 21
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
c
o
&
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 22
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 25
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 26
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 28
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 29
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 31
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 32
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 34
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
4.2.b
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
A
u
d
i
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
Page 1 of 6
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Participation in Two Additional Property Assessed Clean Energy Financing
Programs and Approval of the Association of Bay Area Governments'
Regional Collaborative Services Agreement
Prepared by: Shannan Young, Environmental Coordinator
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider joining the Golden State Finance Authority (GSFA) Joint
Powers Authority (JPA) as an Associate Member and permitting City of Dublin property
owners to participate in the GSFA Senate Bill 555 Community Facilities District and
Assembly Bill 811 Authority Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program;
participating in the California Municipal Finance Authority Open PACE Program; and
participating in the Association of Bay Area Governments' member addendum to the
PACE Regional Collaborative Services Agreement.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the following Resolutions Consenting to:
1. Inclusion of Properties within the City of Dublin’s Jurisdiction in the Golden State
Finance Authority Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Clean Energy) to
Finance Renewable Energy Improvements, Energy Efficiency, Water
Conservation Improvements, Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure and other
Improvements; and Approving Associate Membership in the Joint Exercise of
Powers Authority Related Thereto;
2. Inclusion of Properties within the City of Dublin’s Jurisdiction in the Golden State
Finance Authority Program to Finance Renewable Energy Generation, Energy
and Water Efficiency Improvements, Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure, and
Other Improvements and Approving Associate Membership in the Joint Exercise
of Powers Authority Related Thereto;
3. Inclusion of Properties within the Territory of the City of Dublin in the California
Municipal Finance Authority Open Property Assessed Clean Energy Programs;
Authorizing the California Municipal Finance Authority to Accept Applications
from Property Owners, Conduct Contractual Assessment Proceedings and Levy
Contractual Assessments within the Territory of the City of Dublin; and
4.3
Packet Pg. 42
Page 2 of 6
Authorizing Related Actions;
4. Approval of Property Assessed Clean Energy Programs in the City of Dublin; and
5. Participation in and Acknowledgement of the Association of Bay Area
Governments' Regional Collaborative Services Agreement, as executed between
the Association of Bay Area Governments and Residential Property Assessed
Clean Energy Providers.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Adoption of the Resolutions and actions contained herein would not result in any
additional costs to the City. All costs of marketing, financing, and program
administration are borne by the program administrators and with private capital. There
will be no impact to the General Fund.
DESCRIPTION:
There are currently three Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs operating
in the City of Dublin. The first PACE program authorized in the City of Dublin was the
California Enterprise Development Authority California PACE Program which was
approved on March 20, 2012 by Resolution 36-12 (Attachment 1) and on October 21,
2014 by Resolution 179-14 (Attachment 2). The California PACE program is an
economic development incentive program for commercial properties. Subsequently, the
California HERO Program (a residential PACE Program) was authorized on October 6,
2015 by Resolution 157-15 (Attachment 3). Most recently, City Council authorized the
California Statewide Communities Development Authority (CSCDA) Open PACE
Program on January 10, 2017 by Resolution 02-17 (Attachment 4). The CSCDA Open
PACE Program includes five PACE providers, offering a mix of residential and
commercial providers.
Legislation Background
Two pieces of legislation enabled PACE programs in California and then several
additional laws clarified and expanded this legislation:
1. California Assembly Bill (AB) 811 (July 21, 2008) allows renewable energy
sources and energy efficiency upgrades to be financed through an
assessment district. California AB 474 (January 1, 2010) and California Senate
Bill (SB) 1340 (September 30, 2010) expanded AB 811 to include water-
efficiency improvements and the installation of charging stations for electric
vehicles.
2. SB 555 (October 5, 2011) amended the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act
to allow for the creation of Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) for financing
or refinancing the acquisition, installation, and improvement of energy
efficiency, water conservation, renewable energy and electric vehicle charging
infrastructure. Individual properties can be annexed into the district and can be
subject to the special tax that is imposed to repay project financing if a City
Council adopts a resolution consenting to the inclusion of parcels in the
incorporated areas of a City within the CFD and each participating owner
4.3
Packet Pg. 43
Page 3 of 6
provides its unanimous written approval for annexation of its property into the
PACE CFD.
In July 2010, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), along with Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, objected to the first priority lien status of residential PACE financing and
announced they would not purchase mortgages for homes with PACE obligations due to
concerns that PACE loans would be paid first in case of foreclosure. This
announcement slowed the residential PACE market for several years. To address this
issue, in 2013 Governor Brown signed SB 96, which created a $10 million PACE Loan
Loss Reserve to keep mortgage lenders whole during a foreclosure or a forced sale of a
property with a PACE assessment. While the FHFA has not changed its position, the
California PACE market has grown rapidly with the assurance of the State reserve.
PACE Programs
PACE Programs are intended to allow property owners to finance energy and water
efficiency improvements and pay off the debt through annual installments on their
property tax bill. The intent is to provide an additional means of financing to make
environmentally sustainable property improvements and seismic upgrades more
affordable and accessible to property owners.
The potential benefits of PACE financing over other financing options include 100%
financing for eligible improvements, a longer repayment period of up to 20 years, and
the reliability of pre-approved contractors. These programs also differ from traditional
financing in its repayment structure. Debt obligations run with the property rather than
the applicant, because the repayment is generated from the utility savings associated
with the improvements. Terms vary by program, but are generally considered in-line
with market rate options for similar improvements. As with other forms of private
lending, all transactions are voluntary, and no property owner is required to participate
in any program.
Creating a competitive PACE marketplace provides a variety of options for home and
business owners to finance improvement projects based on finance terms, conditions of
approval, and eligible measures offered by the different programs. Additionally,
authorizing multiple providers ensures that financing will remain available if one or more
providers cease to operate in the City of Dublin. Finally, it is anticipated that there will be
increased economic activity because of each new provider operating locally.
Authorizing the two additional PACE providers would not limit City Council’s ability to
consider additional providers in Dublin at a later date. An overview of each of the
proposed PACE programs follows.
Ygrene PACE Program
The Ygrene PACE Program serves residential and commercial projects, and is the only
provider originating in multiple states. In California, over 180 cities and counties have
adopted the program since its launch in 2013, including Alameda County and the cities
of Hayward, Oakland, Union City, San Leandro and Fremont. To date, the program has
approved funding of more than $1.1 billion and has certified over 2,500 contractors in
California.
4.3
Packet Pg. 44
Page 4 of 6
The Ygrene PACE Program requires City Council approval of membership in the
Golden State Finance Authority (GSFA), which administers the program. Membership in
this Joint Powers Authority authorizes the program to provide services in Dublin and is
limited in scope to the PACE program only. Due to the unique nature of the GSFA
Ygrene program, two Resolutions are required for authorization. The first Resolution
(Attachment 5) would make all properties in Dublin eligible to participate in GSFA's
Community Facilities District (CFD) for PACE financing as authorized under SB 555.
The GSFA JPA Agreement is included for reference as Exhibit A to the Resolution
(Attachment 6) as well as Exhibit B to the Resolution, the GSFA new member
acknowledgement page (Attachment 7). The second Resolution (Attachment 8) would
make all properties in Dublin eligible to participate in GSFA's Contractual Assessmen t
program for PACE authorized under AB 811. The GSFA JPA Agreement is included for
reference as Exhibit A to the Resolution (Attachment 9), along with Exhibit B to the
Resolution, the GSFA new member acknowledgement page (Attachment 10).
CMFA Open PACE Program
CMFA Open PACE Program launched in August 2015 and operates under AB 811. It is
sponsored by the California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA), of which Dublin is a
member (Attachment 11). CMFA is utilizing the Open PACE structure with the goal of
creating a platform to evaluate and pre-qualify PACE providers so that local
governments only need to pass a single resolution to authorize multiple programs. The
CMFA along with its current Program Administrators, which includes Energy Efficient
Equity, Inc.; BlueFlame PACE Services LLC; OnPACE Energy Solutions, LLC; Petros
PACE Administrator, LLC; Structured Finance Associates, LLC; and Twain Community
Partners II LLC, are offering PACE financing for residential and commercial property
owners in its member territories. The CMFA is expected to issue limited obligation
bonds, notes or other forms of indebtedness to fund the projects.
Since implementation, over 75 cities and counties have approved the CMFA Open
PACE suite of programs, including Alameda County, Fremont, Hayward and San
Leandro. Since the City of Dublin is already a member of the CMFA JPA, the
Resolution (Attachment 12) authorizing CMFA to operate PACE Programs in Dublin is
all that is required for the City to participate in this Open PACE Program.
Potential Future PACE Programs
Given the numerous PACE choices available to businesses and residents in the City of
Dublin, Staff does not anticipate recommending additional PACE providers for approval
in the near future. However, to streamline the process of PACE approvals in the future,
Staff recommends that City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to approve
new PACE programs as described in the Resolution (Attachment 13).
ABAG Regional Collaborative Services Agreement
Private financing companies entered the PACE market by partnering with joint powers
authorities (JPA) to establish and finance PACE programs. Since the PACE provider’s
primary relationship is with the JPA partner, cities have had little control over local
PACE activities. To safeguard consumer interests and promote program success, the
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Bay Area Regional Energy
4.3
Packet Pg. 45
Page 5 of 6
Network developed the Regional Collaborative Services Agreement (RCSA) which
establishes the terms, conditions and rules each residential PACE provider will follow
when operating in ABAG territory (the RCSA does not apply to commercial PACE
programs). While the Agreement is between ABAG and the PACE provider, the
language of the agreement states that it also applies to actions of the PACE provider in
participating cities/towns.
Features of the RCSA include:
Designates ABAG as the liaison to the Residential PACE Providers (RPP) locally
Requires all RPPs to have clearly visible disclosures regarding the FHFA’s
policies on residential PACE programs
Requires all RPPs to participate in the State’s PACE Loss Reserve program
Limits claims that RPPs (or their designated contractors) can make to applicants
regarding the tax deductibility of PACE assessments
Requires data sharing between the RPPs and participating entities to monitor
program performance locally and report out to local stakeholders
Requires RPPs to accept responsibility for negligence in administering PACE
programs
At this time, the residential PACE providers indicated below have signed on to the
RCSA with ABAG. By authorizing execution of the ABAG acknowledgement forms for
each of these residential PACE providers as outlined in the Resolution (Attachment 14)
and Exhibit A to the Resolution (Attachment 15), City Council would be providing
additional safeguards for Dublin residents that chose to invest in their property using
PACE financing. A compendium of the fully executed RCSA documents for the
participating RPPs listed below is provided in Attachment 16:
CounterPointe Energy Solutions (CA) LLC (AllianceNRG Program)
Energy Efficiency Equity
Figtree Financing (Figtree PACE Program/California PACE Program)
PACE Funding Group LLC
Western Riverside Council of Governments (California HERO Program)
Ygrene Energy Fund California LLC (Ygrene PACE Program)
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 36-12
2. Resolution 179-14
3. Resolution 157-15
4. Resolution 02-17
5. Resolution for Golden State Finance Authority's Community Facilities District for
PACE Financing
6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement
4.3
Packet Pg. 46
Page 6 of 6
7. Exhibit B to the Resolution Golden State Finance Authority Signature Page for New
Associate Members
8. Resolution for Golden State Finance Authority's Contractual Assessment Program
for PACE Authorized Under AB 811
9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement
10. Exhibit B to the Resolution Golden State Finance Authority Signature Page for New
Associate Members
11. California Municipal Finance Authority JPA Agreement
12. Resolution California Municipal Finance Authority Open PACE Program
13. Resolution Authorizing Approval of Property Assessed Clean Energy Programs
14. Resolution Acknowledging the ABAG Regional Collaborative Services Agreement
15. Exhibit A to Resolution Acknowledging the ABAG Regional Collaborative Services
Agreement
16. Compendium of Fully Executed RCSA documents
4.3
Packet Pg. 47
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 48
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
3
6
-
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 49
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
3
6
-
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 50
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
3
6
-
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 51
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
3
6
-
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 52
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
3
6
-
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 53
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
3
6
-
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 54
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
3
6
-
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 55
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
3
6
-
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.a
Packet Pg. 56
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
3
6
-
1
2
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
RESOLUTION NO. 179 - 14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING AN ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CALIFORNIA
ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF DUBLIN
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin, California (the "City"), a municipal corporation, duly
organized and existing under the Constitution and the laws of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the City, upon authorization of the City Council, may pursuantto Chapter 5
of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code ofthe State of California, commencing with
Section6500 (the "JPA Law") enter into a joint exercise of powers agreement with oneor more
publicagenciespursuanttowhich such contractingparties may jointly exercise any power
common to them; and
WHEREAS, theCity and other publicagencies wish to jointly participate in economic
development financingprograms for thebenefit of businesses and nonprofit entities within their
jurisdictions offered by membership in the California Enterprise Development Authority ("CEDA")
pursuant to an associatemembership agreement and Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement
Relating to the CaliforniaEnterprise Development Authority (the "Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, under the JPA Law and the Agreement, CEDA is a public entityseparate
and apart from the parties to the Agreement and the debts, liabilities and other obligations of
CEDA will not be the debts, liabilities or obligations ofthe Cityor other members of the
Authority; and
WHEREAS, the form of Associate Membership Agreement ("Membership Agreement")
between theCity and CEDA is incorporated by this reference as Exhibit 1; and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to become an Associate Memberof CEDAsubject to the
provisions of theMembership Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEDthat the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby
approvesthe Associate Membership Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, titled "Associate
Membership Agreement by and between the CaliforniaEnterprise DevelopmentAuthority and
the City of Dublin, California."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the
Agreement substantially in the formattached hereto and to undertake such further action as
may be necessary and desirable to carryoutthe intent of this Resolution.
Page 1 of 2
4.3.b
Packet Pg. 57
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
9
-
1
4
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
PASSED, APPROVEDANDADOPTED this 21st day ofOctober, 2014 by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Biddle, Gupta, Hart, Haubert, and Mayor Sbranti
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
V e its.a-
Mayor
ATTEST:
C14,40Z' / .:CD4/-*
City Clerk
Reso No. 179-14,Adopted 10-21-14, Item 4.7 Page 2 of 2
4.3.b
Packet Pg. 58
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
9
-
1
4
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIPAGREEMENT
by and betweenthe
CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
and the
CITY OF DUBLIN,CALIFORNIA
THIS ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT (this "Associate Membership
Agreement"), dated as of April 26, 2012 by and between CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(the"Authority")and the CITY OF DUBLIN,CALIFORNIA,
a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California
the"City");
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Cities of Selma, Lancaster and Eureka (individually, a"Member" and
collectively, the "Members"), have entered into a Joint Powers Agreement, dated as of June 1,
2006(the"Agreement"),establishing the Authority and prescribing its purposes and powers;and
WHEREAS, the Agreement designates the Executive Committee of the Board of
Directors and the President of the California Association for Local EconomicDevelopment as
the initial Board of Directors of the Authority;and
WHEREAS, the Authority has been formed for thepurpose, among others,to assist for
profit and nonprofit corporations and other entities to obtain financing for projects and purposes
serving the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the Agreementpermits any otherlocal agency in the State of California to
join the Authority as an associate member(an"Associate Member");and
WHEREAS,the City desires to become an Associate Member of the Authority;
WHEREAS, City Council of the City has adopted a resolution approving the Associate
Membership Agreement and the execution and deliverythereof;
WHEREAS,the Board of Directors of the Authority has determined that the City should
become an Associate Member of the Authority;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises and of the mutual
promises herein contained,the Authority and the City do hereby agree as follows:
4833-7301-9141.1
4.3.b
Packet Pg. 59
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
9
-
1
4
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
Section 1. Associate Member Status. The City is hereby madean Associate Member of
the Authority for all purposes of the Agreement and the Bylaws of the Authority,the provisions
of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. From and after the date of execution and
delivery of this Associate MembershipAgreementby the City and the Authority, the City shall
be and remain an Associate Member of the Authority.
Section 2. Restrictions and Rights of Associate Members. The City shall not have the
right, as an Associate Member of the Authority, to vote on any actiontaken by the Board of
Directors or by the Voting Members of the Authority. In addition, no officer, employee or
representative of the City shall have any right to become an officer or director of the Authority
by virtue of the City being an Associate Member of the Authority.
Section 3. Effect of Prior Authority Actions. The City/County hereby agrees to be
subject to and bound by the A.Agreement and B.Bylaws of the Authority.
Section 4. No Obligations of Associate Members. The debts, liabilities and obligations
of the Authority shall not be the'debts,liabilities and obligations of the City.
Section S. Execution of the Agreement. Execution of this Associate Membership
Agreement and the Agreement shallsatisfy the requirements of the Agreement and Article XII of
the Bylaws of the Authority for participationby the City in all programs and other undertakings
of the Authority.
4833-7301-9141.1 2
4.3.b
Packet Pg. 60
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
9
-
1
4
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Associate Membership
Agreement to be executed andattested by their proper officers thereunto duly authorized, on the
dayand year first set forth above.
CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By: /
Gurbax ahota,'Chair
Attest:
7. /
is
MichhqlleStephens,Asst. )etary
tinCITYOFDub CALIFORNIA
By:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
Attest:
City Clerk
4833-7301-9141.1 3
4.3.b
Packet Pg. 61
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
9
-
1
4
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.c
Packet Pg. 62
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
5
7
-
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.c
Packet Pg. 63
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
5
7
-
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.c
Packet Pg. 64
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
5
7
-
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.c
Packet Pg. 65
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
5
7
-
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.c
Packet Pg. 66
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
5
7
-
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.c
Packet Pg. 67
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
5
7
-
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.c
Packet Pg. 68
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
5
7
-
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.c
Packet Pg. 69
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
5
7
-
1
5
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.d
Packet Pg. 70
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
0
2
-
1
7
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.d
Packet Pg. 71
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
0
2
-
1
7
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.d
Packet Pg. 72
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
0
2
-
1
7
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
RESOLUTION NO. xx-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
***********
CONSENTING TO INCLUSION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF DUBLIN’S
JURISDICTION IN THE GOLDEN STATE FINANCE AUTHORITY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2014-1 (CLEAN ENERGY) TO FINANCE RENEWABLE
ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS, ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND WATER CONSERVATION
IMPROVEMENTS, ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE AND
OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND APPROVING ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN THE
JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY RELATED THERETO
WHEREAS, the Golden State Finance Authority, a California joint powers
authority formerly known as California Home Finance Authority (Authority), has
established the Community Facilities District No. 2014-1(Clean Energy) in accordance
with the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act, set forth in sections 53311 through
53368.3 of the California Government Code (Act) and particularly in accordance with
sections 53313.5(l) and 53328.1(a) (District); and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the District is to finance or refinance (including the
payment of interest) the acquisition, installation, and improvement of energy efficiency,
water conservation, renewable energy and electric vehicle charging infrastructure
improvements permanently affixed to private or publicly-owned real property
(Authorized Improvements); and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin is committed to development of renewable energy
generation and energy efficiency improvements, reduction of greenhouse gases, and
protection of the environment; and
WHEREAS, in the Act, the Legislature has authorized a parcel within the territory
of the District to annex to the District and be subject to the special tax levy of the District
only (i) if the city or county within which the parcel is located has consented, by the
adoption of a resolution by the applicable city council or county board of supervisors, to
the inclusion of parcels within its boundaries in the District and (ii) with the unanimous
written approval of the owner or owners of the parcel when it is annexed (Unanimous
Approval Agreement), which, as provided in section 53329.6 of the Act, shall constitute
the election required by the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide innovative solutions to its property owners
to achieve energy efficiency and water conservation and in doing so cooperate with the
Authority in order to efficiently and economically assist property owners the City in
financing such Authorized Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has established the District, as permitted by the Act,
the Authority JPA, originally made and entered into July 1, 1993, as amended to date,
4.3.e
Packet Pg. 73
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
'
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
f
o
r
P
A
C
E
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
4
]
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
and the City, desires to become an Associate Member of the JPA by acknowledgement
of the JPA Agreement to participate in the programs of the JPA, and to assist property
owners within the incorporated area of the City in financing the cost of installing
Authorized Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City will not be responsible for the conduct of any special tax
proceedings; the levy and collection of special taxes or any required remedial action in
the case of delinquencies in the payment of any special taxes in connection with the
District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. This City Council finds and declares that properties in the City’s
incorporated area will be benefited by the availability of the Authority CFD No. 2014-1
(Clean Energy) to finance the installation of the Authorized Improvements.
2. This City Council consents to inclusion in the Authority CFD No. 2014-1
(Clean Energy) of all of the properties in the incorporated area within the City and to the
Authorized Improvements, upon the request of and execution of the Unanimous
Approval Agreement by the owners of such properties when such properties are
annexed, in compliance with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to such program;
and to the assumption of jurisdiction there over by Authority for the purposes thereof.
3. The consent of this City Council constitutes assent to the assumption of
jurisdiction by Authority for all purposes of the Authority CFD No. 2014-1 (Clean Energy)
and authorizes Authority, upon satisfaction of the conditions imposed in this resolution,
to take each and every step required for or suitable for financing the Authorized
Improvements.
4. City staff is authorized and directed to coordinate with Authority staff to
facilitate operation of the Authority CFD No. 2014-1 (Clean Energy) within the City, and
report back periodically to this City Council on the success of such program.
5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The City
Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the
Authority.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does
hereby approve joining the JPA as an Associate Member, with a copy of the JPA
Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and authorizes the City Manager to execute
the Golden State Finance Authority Signature Page for New Associate Members
attached hereto as Exhibit “B,” and any necessary documents to effectuate such
membership.
4.3.e
Packet Pg. 74
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
'
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
f
o
r
P
A
C
E
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
4
]
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December 2017 by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
City Clerk
Attachments:
1. Exhibit A. GSFA JPA Agreement
2. Exhibit B. Golden State Finance Authority Signature Page for New Associate
Members
4.3.e
Packet Pg. 75
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
'
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
f
o
r
P
A
C
E
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
4
]
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
7
6
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
7
7
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
7
8
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
7
9
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
8
0
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
8
1
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
8
2
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
8
3
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
8
4
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
8
5
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
8
6
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
8
7
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
f
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
8
8
Attachment: 6. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR NEW ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
NAME OF COUNTY OR CITY:
______________________________ Dated:
By:
Name:
Title:
Attest:
By __________________________________
[Clerk of the Board Supervisors or City Clerk]
4.3.f
Packet Pg. 89
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR NEW ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF THE GOLDEN STATE FINANCE AUTHORITY
AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
CITY OF DUBLIN
By: Dated:
Christopher L. Foss,
City Manager
Attest:
By __________________________________
City Clerk
4.3.g
Packet Pg. 90
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
S
i
g
n
a
t
u
r
e
P
a
g
e
f
o
r
N
e
w
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
M
e
m
b
e
r
s
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
]
RESOLUTION NO. xx-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
***********
CONSENTING TO INCLUSION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF DUBLIN’S
JURISDICTION IN THE GOLDEN STATE FINANCE AUTHORITY PROGRAM TO FINANCE
RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY
IMPROVEMENTS, ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE, AND OTHER
IMPROVEMENTS AND APPROVING ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP IN THE JOINT
EXERCISE OF POWERS AUTHORITY RELATED THERETO
WHEREAS, the Golden State Finance Authority (GSFA) is a joint exercise of powers
authority established pursuant to Chapter 5 of Division 7, Title 1 of the Government Code of
the State of California (Section 6500 and following) (Act) and the Joint Power Agreement
entered into on July 1, 1993, as amended from time to time (GSFA JPA); and
WHEREAS, GSFA has established a property assessed clean energy (PACE) Program
(GSFA PACE Program) to provide for the financing of renewable energy generation, energy
and water efficiency improvements, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and other
improvements (Improvements) pursuant to Chapter 29 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1911,
being Division 7 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Chapter 29) within counties and
cities throughout the State of California that elect to participate in such program; and
WHEREAS, City of Dublin (City) is committed to development of renewable energy
generation and energy and water efficiency improvements, reduction of greenhouse gases,
and protection of the environment; and
WHEREAS, in Chapter 29, the Legislature has authorized cities and counties to assist
property owners in financing the cost of installing Improvements through a voluntary
contractual assessment program; and
WHEREAS, installation of such Improvements by property owners within the
jurisdictional boundaries of the counties and cities that are participating in the GSFA PACE
Program would promote the purposes cited above; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide innovative solutions to its property owners to
achieve energy and water efficiency, and in doing so cooperate with GSFA in order to
efficiently and economically assist property owners within the City in financing such
Improvements; and
WHEREAS, GSFA has established the GSFA PACE Program, which is such a
voluntary contractual assessment program, as permitted by the Act, the GSFA JPA, originally
made and entered into July 1, 1993, as amended to date, and the City, desires to become an
Associate Member of the JPA by acknowledgment of the JPA Agreement to participate in the
4.3.h
Packet Pg. 91
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
8
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
'
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
u
a
l
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
f
o
r
P
A
C
E
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
U
n
d
e
r
A
B
8
1
1
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
programs of the JPA, and to assist property owners within the jurisdiction of the City in
financing the cost of installing Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City will not be responsible for the conduct of any assessment
proceedings; the levy and collection of assessments or any required remedial action in the
case of delinquencies in the payment of any assessments or the issuance, sale or
administration of any bonds issued in connection with the GSFA PACE Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. This City Council finds and declares that properties in the City’s incorporated
area will be benefited by the availability of the GSFA PACE Program to finance the installation
of the Improvements.
2. This City Council consents to inclusion in the GSFA PACE Program of all of the
properties in the jurisdictional boundaries of the City and to the Improvements, upon the
request by and voluntary agreement of owners of such properties, in compliance with the laws,
rules and regulations applicable to such program; and to the assumption of jurisdiction there
over by GSFA for the purposes thereof.
3. The consent of this City Council constitutes assent to the assumption of
jurisdiction by GSFA for all purposes of the GSFA PACE Program and authorizes GSFA, upon
satisfaction of the conditions imposed in this resolution, to take each and every step required
for or suitable for financing the Improvements, including the levying, collecting and
enforcement of the contractual assessments to finance the Improvements and the issuance
and enforcement of bonds to represent such contractual assessments.
4. City staff is authorized and directed to coordinate with GSFA Authority staff to
facilitate operation of the GSFA PACE Program within the City.
5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. The City Clerk is
directed to send a certified copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the Authority.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby
approve joining the JPA as an Associate Member, with a copy of the JPA Agreement attached
hereto as Exhibit “A,” and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Golden State Finance
Authority Signature Page for New Associate Members attached hereto as Exhibit “B,” and any
necessary documents to effectuate such membership.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 2017 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
4.3.h
Packet Pg. 92
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
8
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
'
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
u
a
l
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
f
o
r
P
A
C
E
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
U
n
d
e
r
A
B
8
1
1
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
ABSTAIN:
_________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
City Clerk
Attachments:
1. Exhibit A. Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement
2. Exhibit B. Golden State Finance Authority Signature Page for New Associate Members
4.3.h
Packet Pg. 93
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
8
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
'
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
u
a
l
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
f
o
r
P
A
C
E
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
U
n
d
e
r
A
B
8
1
1
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
9
4
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
9
5
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
9
6
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
9
7
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
9
8
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
9
9
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
0
0
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
0
1
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
0
2
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
0
3
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
0
4
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
0
5
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
4.
3
.
i
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
1
0
6
Attachment: 9. Exhibit A to Resolution Golden State Finance Authority JPA Agreement (Consideration of Property Assessed Clean Energy
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR NEW ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
NAME OF COUNTY OR CITY:
______________________________ Dated:
By:
Name:
Title:
Attest:
By __________________________________
[Clerk of the Board Supervisors or City Clerk]
4.3.i
Packet Pg. 107
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR NEW ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF THE GOLDEN STATE FINANCE AUTHORITY
AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
CITY OF DUBLIN
By: Dated:
Christopher L. Foss,
City Manager
Attest:
By __________________________________
City Clerk
4.3.j
Packet Pg. 108
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
t
o
t
h
e
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
G
o
l
d
e
n
S
t
a
t
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
S
i
g
n
a
t
u
r
e
P
a
g
e
f
o
r
N
e
w
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
M
e
m
b
e
r
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 109
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 110
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 111
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 112
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 113
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 114
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 115
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 116
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 117
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 118
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.k
Packet Pg. 119
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
1
.
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
J
P
A
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
OHSUSA:759366422.3
RESOLUTION NO. xx-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
***********
CONSENTING TO THE INCLUSION OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF
THE CITY IN THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY OPEN PACE
PROGRAMS; AUTHORIZING THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL FINANCE AUTHORITY
TO ACCEPT APPLICATIONS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS, CONDUCT
CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS AND LEVY CONTRACTUAL
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE CITY; AND AUTHORIZING
RELATED ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) is a joint exercise
of powers authority, the members of which include numerous cities and counties in the
State of California, including the City of Dublin (City); and
WHEREAS, the CMFA is implementing Property Assessed Clean Energy
(PACE) programs, which it has designated CMFA Open PACE, consisting of CMFA
Open PACE programs each administered by a separate program administrator
(collectively with any successors, assigns, replacements or additions, the Programs), to
allow the financing or refinancing of renewable energy, energy efficiency, water
efficiency and seismic strengthening improvements, electric vehicle charging
infrastructure and such other improvements, infrastructure or other work as may be
authorized by law from time to time (collectively, the Improvements) through the levy of
contractual assessments pursuant to Chapter 29 of Division 7 of the Streets &
Highways Code (Chapter 29) within counties and cities throughout the State of
California that consent to the inclusion of properties within their respective territories in
the Programs and the issuance of bonds from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the program administrators currently active in administering
Programs are Energy Efficient Equity, Inc.; BlueFlame PACE Services LLC; OnPACE
Energy Solutions, LLC; Petros PACE Administrator, LLC; Structured Finance
Associates, LLC; and Twain Community Partners II LLC; and the CMFA will notify the
City in advance of any additions or changes; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 29 provides that assessments may be levied under its
provisions only with the free and willing consent of the owner or owners of each lot or
parcel on which an assessment is levied at the time the assessment is levied; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to allow the owners of property (Participating
Property Owners) within its territory to participate in the Programs and to allow the
Authority to conduct assessment proceedings under Chapter 29 within its territory and
to issue bonds to finance or refinance Improvements; and
4.3.l
Packet Pg. 120
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
O
p
e
n
P
A
C
E
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
2
OHSUSA:759366422.3
WHEREAS, the territory within which assessments may be levied for the
Programs shall include all of the territory within the City’s official boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the CMFA will conduct all assessment proceedings under Chapter
29 for the Programs and issue any bonds issued in connection with the Programs; and
WHEREAS, the City will not be responsible for the conduct of any assessment
proceedings; the levy of assessments; any required remedial action in the case of
delinquencies in such assessment payments; or the issuance, sale, administration
repayment or guarantee of any bonds issued in connection with the Programs;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Dublin
as follows:
1. This City Council hereby finds and declares that properties in the territory
of the City will benefit from the availability of the Programs within the territory of the City
and, pursuant thereto, the conduct of special assessment proceedings by the CMFA
pursuant to Chapter 29 and the issuance of bonds to finance or refinance
Improvements.
2. In connection with the Programs, the City hereby consents to the conduct
of special assessment proceedings by the CMFA pursuant to Chapter 29 on any
property within the territory of the City and the issuance of bonds to finance or refinance
Improvements; provided, that
(a) The Participating Property Owners, who shall be the legal owners
of such property, execute a contract pursuant to Chapter 29 and comply with
other applicable provisions of California law in order to accomplish the valid levy
of assessments; and
(b) The City will not be responsible for the conduct of any assessment
proceedings; the levy of assessments; any required remedial action in the case
of delinquencies in such assessment payments; or the issuance, sale,
administration, repayment or guarantee of any bonds issued in connection with
the Programs.
3. The appropriate officials and staff of the City are hereby authorized and
directed to execute and deliver such certificates, requisitions, agreements and related
documents as are reasonably required by the Authority to implement the Programs.
4. The City may withdraw from the Programs or any Program upon six
months written notice to the CMFA. The City may withdraw its consent and approval for
the conduct of special assessment proceedings by any specific program administrator
under a Program within the jurisdictional limits of the City upon 30 days written notice to
the CMFA without (a) liability to the Authority or any affiliated entity, and (b) withdrawing
its consent and approval for the conduct of special assessment proceedings by any
other program administrators under the other Programs. The City’s withdrawal from any
4.3.l
Packet Pg. 121
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
O
p
e
n
P
A
C
E
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
3
OHSUSA:759366422.3
Program shall not affect the validity of any voluntary assessment contract entered into
prior to the date of such withdrawal or entered into after the date of such withdrawal so
long as the application for such voluntary assessment contract was submitted to and
approved by the CMFA prior to the date of the City’s notice of withdrawal.
5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of
this resolution to the Financial Advisor of the Authority at: California Municipal Finance
Authority, 2111 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 320, Carlsbad, California 92011, Attn:
Travis Cooper.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 2017 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
City Clerk
4.3.l
Packet Pg. 122
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
2
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
O
p
e
n
P
A
C
E
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
RESOLUTION NO. xx-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
***********
AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY
PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, City of Dublin (City) is committed to development of renewable
energy generation and energy and water efficiency improvements, reduction of
greenhouse gases, and protection of the environment; and
WHEREAS, in Chapter 29 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1911, being Division
7 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Chapter 29) the Legislature has
authorized cities and counties to assist property owners in financing the cost of installing
energy and water efficiency improvements (Improvements) through a voluntary
contractual assessment program; and
WHEREAS, property assessed clean energy (PACE) programs offer an
innovative mechanism for financing voluntary energy efficiency, renewable energy
improvements and seismic upgrades on residential and commercial properties; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide innovative solutions to its property owners
to achieve energy and water efficiency and independence; and
WHEREAS, City Council has to date consented to the inclusion of properties
within the City of Dublin in five PACE Programs offered to commercial and residential
property owners; and
WHEREAS, creating a competitive PACE marketplace provides a variety of
options for home and business owners to finance improvement projects based on
finance terms, conditions of approval, and eligible measures offered by the different
programs; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City to streamline the process of PACE
Program approvals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Dublin does hereby:
1) Authorize the City Manager to accept and allow new PACE Programs in the
City of Dublin and execute any agreements related thereto; and
2) Make these authorizations effective as of the date of this Resolution until
rescinded by the City Council.
4.3.m
Packet Pg. 123
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
i
n
g
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 2017 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
City Clerk
4.3.m
Packet Pg. 124
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
i
n
g
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
RESOLUTION NO. xx-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
***********
ACKNOWLEDGING THE ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’
REGIONAL COLLABORATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, in Chapter 29 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1911, being Division
7 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Chapter 29) the Legislature has
authorized cities and counties to assist property owners in financing the cost of installing
energy and water efficiency improvements (Improvements) through a voluntary
contractual assessment program; and
WHEREAS, property assessed clean energy (PACE) programs offer an
innovative mechanism for financing voluntary energy efficiency, renewable energy
improvements and seismic upgrades on residential and commercial properties; and
WHEREAS, City Council has consented to the inclusion of properties within the
City of Dublin in five PACE Programs; and
WHEREAS, private financing companies entered the PACE market by partnering
with joint powers authorities (JPA) to establish and finance PACE programs; and
WHEREAS, the PACE provider’s primary relationship is with the JPA partner,
hence cities have had little control over local PACE activities; and
WHEREAS, to safeguard consumer interests and promote PACE program
success, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Bay Area Regional
Energy Network developed the Regional Collaborative Services Agreement (RCSA)
which establishes the terms, conditions and rules each residential PACE provider will
follow when operating in the nine county ABAG territory.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Dublin does hereby:
1) Authorize execution by the City Manager of the ABAG member
acknowledgement forms (Acknowledgements) for each of the residential
PACE providers operating in the City of Dublin that have signed the RCSA
with ABAG.
2) Authorize the City Manager to execute acknowledgment forms for PACE
providers that sign the RCSA subsequent to the date of this Resolution.
3) Direct the City Clerk to send a copy of the Acknowledgements to ABAG and
the PACE Providers included herein as Exhibit “A.”
4.3.n
Packet Pg. 125
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
4
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
B
A
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
]
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 2017 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
City Clerk
Attachments:
1. Exhibit A – ABAG Member Acknowledgement Forms
4.3.n
Packet Pg. 126
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
4
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
B
A
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
]
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
Exhibit A.
ABAG Member Acknowledgement Forms
4.3.o
Packet Pg. 127
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
B
A
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
TO: CounterPointe Energy Solutions (CA), LLC:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Dublin has executed this Agreement as of December 5, 2017.
City of Dublin:
By: __________________________________
Christopher L. Foss,
City Manager
Method and Place of Giving Notice. All notices to City of Dublin shall be made in writing and
shall be given by personal delivery or by U.S. Mail or courier service. Notices shall be
addressed as follows and as set forth in the signature page for City of Dublin:
Name: Environmental Coordinator
Address: Public Works/Environmental Services Division
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Phone Number: 925-833-6630
E-mail: environmental.services@dublin.ca.gov
4.3.o
Packet Pg. 128
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
B
A
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
TO: Energy Efficient Equity:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Dublin has executed this Agreement as of December 5, 2017.
City of Dublin:
By: __________________________________
Christopher L. Foss,
City Manager
Method and Place of Giving Notice. All notices to City of Dublin shall be made in writing and
shall be given by personal delivery or by U.S. Mail or courier service. Notices shall be
addressed as follows and as set forth in the signature page for City of Dublin:
Name: Environmental Coordinator
Address: Public Works/Environmental Services Division
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Phone Number: 925-833-6630
E-mail: environmental.services@dublin.ca.gov
4.3.o
Packet Pg. 129
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
B
A
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
TO: Figtree Company, Inc.:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Dublin has executed this Agreement as of December 5, 2017.
City of Dublin:
By: __________________________________
Christopher L. Foss,
City Manager
Method and Place of Giving Notice. All notices to City of Dublin shall be made in writing and
shall be given by personal delivery or by U.S. Mail or courier service. Notices shall be
addressed as follows and as set forth in the signature page for City of Dublin:
Name: Environmental Coordinator
Address: Public Works/Environmental Services Division
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Phone Number: 925-833-6630
E-mail: environmental.services@dublin.ca.gov
4.3.o
Packet Pg. 130
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
B
A
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
TO: PACE Funding Group LLC,:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Dublin has executed this Agreement as of December 5, 2017.
City of Dublin:
By: __________________________________
Christopher L. Foss,
City Manager
Method and Place of Giving Notice. All notices to City of Dublin shall be made in writing and
shall be given by personal delivery or by U.S. Mail or courier service. Notices shall be
addressed as follows and as set forth in the signature page for City of Dublin:
Name: Environmental Coordinator
Address: Public Works/Environmental Services Division
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Phone Number: 925-833-6630
E-mail: environmental.services@dublin.ca.gov
4.3.o
Packet Pg. 131
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
B
A
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
TO: Western Riverside Council of Governments:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Dublin has executed this Agreement as of December 5, 2017.
City of Dublin:
By: __________________________________
Christopher L. Foss,
City Manager
Method and Place of Giving Notice. All notices to City of Dublin shall be made in writing and
shall be given by personal delivery or by U.S. Mail or courier service. Notices shall be
addressed as follows and as set forth in the signature page for City of Dublin:
Name: Environmental Coordinator
Address: Public Works/Environmental Services Division
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Phone Number: 925-833-6630
E-mail: environmental.services@dublin.ca.gov
4.3.o
Packet Pg. 132
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
B
A
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
TO: Ygrene Energy Fund California, LLC.:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Dublin has executed this Agreement as of December 5, 2017.
City of Dublin:
By: __________________________________
Christopher L. Foss,
City Manager
Method and Place of Giving Notice. All notices to City of Dublin shall be made in writing and
shall be given by personal delivery or by U.S. Mail or courier service. Notices shall be
addressed as follows and as set forth in the signature page for City of Dublin:
Name: Environmental Coordinator
Address: Public Works/Environmental Services Division
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Phone Number: 925-833-6630
E-mail: environmental.services@dublin.ca.gov
4.3.o
Packet Pg. 133
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
5
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
i
n
g
t
h
e
A
B
A
G
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
Exhibit 16. Compendium of Fully Executed RCSA Documents
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 134
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will provide support and resources to Participating Entity
as requested related to education, outreach and development of the energy upgrade
industry and trades; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will support, align and integrate its efforts with the
community-wide goals for job creation, resource demand reduction, and renewable
energy generation; and
WHEREAS, the~PACEProvider~wllLestablish~OWI+~interestrates, repayment terms, and
fees as state and federal laws and the market defines and allows; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will arrange for the collection of Property Assessed Clean
Energy assessments it has financed directly with the Participating Entity's County Tax
Collector's Office; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement does not include any financial arrangements between the
PACE Provider, ABAG and the Participating Entity that signs this Agreement, nor does it
preclude any separate contracts, contract terms for services or support; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the mutual understandings
between ABAG and the PACE Provider and to establish basic operating procedures for
any PACE provider operating within the ABAG territory.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1 Definitions.
1.1 ((Eligible improvement" is a technology, product or tool officially approved by
the PACE provider. The improvements may include distributed generation
renewable energy sources, energy and water efficiency improvements, and
electric vehicle charging infrastructure improvements that will be permanently
affixed to real property, and any additional improvements deemed eligible in
the future by the California Legislature and/or the California Judiciary.
1.2 IIPACE Provider" is an entity participating in ABAG territory administering a
program providing Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing.
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 136
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 155
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 156
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 157
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 158
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 159
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 160
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 161
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 162
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 163
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 164
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 165
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 166
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 167
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 168
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 169
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 170
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 171
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 172
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 173
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 174
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 175
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
AGREEMENT FOR COLLABORATIVE SERVICES
FOR PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY FINANCING
This Agreement for Collaborative Services ("Agreement"), dated as of April 6, 2016,
("Effective Date") is by and among the Association of Bay Area Governments
(hereinafter "ABAG"), Figtree Company, Inc., (hereinafter "PACE Provider"), as an entity
administering a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing program utilizing
either the California Assembly Bill 811 and/or California Senate Bill 555 model and any
Participating Entity, as defined in Section 1.3 below, that adopts this Agreement.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, ABAG is committed to mitigating and adapting to the causes and impacts of
climate change and supporting energy independence from fossil fuels to safeguard the
environment, human health and the economy; and
WHEREAS, ABAG as Program Administrator for the Bay Area Regional Energy Network
(BayREN), works closely with 101 cities in the nine county Bay Area region (ABAG
territory) to develop and implement innovative energy efficiency programs, including
supporting commercial and residential Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE)
programs; and
WHEREAS, the BayREN offers programs, technical resources and education for energy
upgrades and retrofits; and
WHEREAS, the objective of the BayREN is to help property owners save energy, save
money, and live comfortably; and
WHEREAS, the BayREN seeks to assist local governments to understand all aspects of
partnering with PACE Providers in order to minimize customer confusion, provide access
to education and information to property owners and assist with making informed
decisions on rebates and incentives, contractor programs, and financing options; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider is willing to participate to support community climate
goals and minimize consumer and contractor confusion; and
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 176
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will provide support and resources to any Participating
Entity as requested related to education, outreach and development of the energy
upgrade industry and trades; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will support, align and integrate its efforts with the
community-wide goals for job creation, resource demand reduction, and renewable
energy generation; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will establish its own interest rates, repayment terms, and
fees as state and federal laws and the market defines and allows; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will arrange for the collection of Property Assessed Clean
Energy assessments it has financed directly with the Participating Entity's County Tax
Collector's Office; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement does not include any financial arrangements between the
PACE Provider, ABAG and the Participating Entity adopting this Agreement, nor does it
preclude any separate contracts, contract terms for services or support; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the mutual understandings
between ABAG and the PACE Provider and to establish basic operating procedures for
any PACE provider operating within the ABAG territory, and any Participating Entity that
adopts this agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1 Definitions.
1.1 If Eligible improvement" is a technology, product or tool officially approved by
the PACE provider. The improvements may include distributed generation
renewable energy sources, energy and water efficiency improvements, and
electric vehicle charging infrastructure improvements that will be permanently
affixed to real property, and any additional improvements deemed eligible in
the future by the California Legislature and/or the California Judiciary.
1.2 "PACE Provider" is an entity participating in ABAG territory administering a
program providing Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing.
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 177
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
ii. Dollar amount financed (the amount of the assessment
and/or special tax)
iii. Listing of all energy efficiency and water conservation
eligible improvements installed by virtue of the
financing, including the unit of measure for the
improvement and the quantity installed as captured by
Participating Contractor
iv. Listing of all renewable generation improvements
installed and the solar STC-DC rating in watts or kilowatts
as captured by Participating Contractor
v. Estimated energy and water savings (in appropriate
units) associated with the project
vi.
b. If available (in the aggregate):
i. Amount of rebate or incentive dollars associated with
the project (not financed) and the name of the program
ii. How the customer heard about PACE financing
iii. Why the customer selected PACE over other financing
instruments available
iv. Why the customer selected their final PACE Provider
over the other members
The Participating Entity will:
Maintain the privacy and security of data received from PACE Provider. Participating
Entity shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations and applicable
California Public Utilities Commission regulations. Participating Entity may only provide
reports relating to Section 2.s.3(a)(ii)-(v} for public distribution that aggregate the data
such that individual customer information cannot be identified, unless such customer
has authorized written release of individual customer information. A Participating Entity
shall not share with any third party the data and reports provided by a PACE Provider
pursuant to Section 2.5.3(b) (if any).
2.5.4 Provide the documents required for participation in the PACE Providers'
PACE Financing program to Participating Entity officials.
2.5.5 Provide support to Participating Entity's staff to facilitate adoption of
required participation documents.
2.6 ABAG will encourage Participating Entity to offer staff resources and
support to bring forward to their respective boards or councils the documents
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 181
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
•
•
•
•
•
•
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 192
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications at any time.
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 196
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
AGREEMENT FOR COLLABORATIVE SERVICES
FOR PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY FINANCING
This Agreement for Collaborative Services ("Agreement"), dated as of
, 2016 ("Effective Date") is by and among the Association of Bay Area Governments
(hereinafter "ABAG"), PACE Funding Group LLC, (hereinafter IIPACE Provider"), as an
entity administering a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing program
utilizing either the California Assembly Bill 811 and/or California Senate Bill
and any Participating Entity, as defined in Section 1.3 below, that adopts this
Agreement.
RECITALS
model
WHEREAS, ABAG is committed to mitigating and adapting to the causes and impacts of
climate change and supporting energy independence from fossil fuels to safeguard the
environment, human health and the economy; and
WHEREAS, ABAG as Program Administrator for the Bay Area Regional Energy Network
(BayREN), works closely with 101 cities in the nine county Bay Area region (A BAG
territory) to develop and implement innovative energy efficiency programs, including
supporting commercial and residential Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE)
programs; and
WHEREAS, the BayREN offers programs, technical resources and education for energy
upgrades and retrofits; and
WHEREAS, the objective of the BayREN is to help property owners save energy, save
money, and live comfortably; and
WHEREAS, the BayREN seeks to assist local governments to
partnering with PACE Providers in order to minimize customer
C .. ·C'T-. .... " all ~C"n.,r'lrTC"
provide access
to education and information to property owners and with
decisions on rebates and incentives, contractor programs, and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider is willing to participate to support community climate
goals and minimize consumer and contractor confusion;
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 197
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will provide support and resources to any Participating
Entity as requested related to education, outreach and development of the energy
upgrade industry and trades; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will support, align and integrate its efforts with the
community-wide goals for job creation, resource demand reduction, and renewable
energy generation; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will establish its own interest rates, repayment terms, and
fees as state and federal laws and the market defines and allows; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will arrange for the collection of Property Assessed Clean
Energy assessments it has financed directly with the Participating Entity's County Tax
Collector's Office; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement does not include any financial arrangements between the
PACE Provider, ABAG and the Participating Entity adopting this Agreement, nor does it
preclude any separate contracts, contract terms for services or support; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the mutual understandings
between ABAG and the PACE Provider and to establish basic operating procedures for
any PACE provider operating within the ABAG territory, and any Participating Entity that
adopts this agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1 Definitions.
1.1 "Eligible improvement" is a technology, product or
the PACE provider. The improvements may include
approved by
renewable energy sources, energy and water improvements,
electric vehicle charging infrastructure improvements that will be permanently
affixed to real property, and any additional improvements deemed eligible in
the future by the California Legislature and/or the California Judiciary.
1.2 "PACE Provider" is an entity participating in ABAG a
nl"'rHTI""::l1"'n providing Property I""'\';>';;''';;.;>.,'';;\,.i
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 198
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
2.4
The PACE Provider will:
2.4.1 For programs offering residential PACE financing, an participant
in the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation
Financing Authority (CAEATFA) PACE Loan Loss Reserve or
comparable loan loss reserve program which includes at minimum the
parameters outlined in Attachment 2.
2.4.2 Notify ABAG six months in advance if funding capacity available from the
PACE Provider to prospective PACE customers in the Participating Entity
will fall below the amount dispersed in the previous six months of
operation.
2.4.3 Notify ABAG of any foreclosure action as a result of a default in the
payment of a PACE assessment on property within ABAG's geographical
boundaries, where the PACE assessment was originated by the PACE
Provider.
2.5 Documents, Data, and Information Policies.
The PACE Provider will:
2.5.1 Provide to Participating Entity (for internal evaluation purposes only and
not for distribution to any third party or for marketing purposes, other
than as required by law) by request of Participating Entity, electronic
access to the name, business name, and California State Contractors
license number of participating contractors of the PACE Provider's
program whose business address is located in the requesting
Participating Entity or who conduct business in the requesting
Participating Entity.
2.5.2 Retain completed Residential Disclosure (hardcopy or electronic) on file
for duration of assessment, and furnish to Participating Entity upon
request.
Provide upon request either direct real time access to data or quarterly
reports in an open electronic file format (such as to
Participating Entity by request for internal
not for distribution to any third party, including, without .. ..."...1"""\1'., .........
companies, services providers and equipment manufacturers or for
marketing purposes) that includes the following information for each
assessment:
a. Required data:
Number
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 201
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
ii. Dollar amount financed (the amount the assessment
and/or special tax)
iii. Listing of all energy efficiency and water conservation
eligible improvements installed by virtue of the
financing, including the unit of measure the
improvement and the quantity installed as captured by
Participating Contractor
iv. Listing of all renewable generation improvements
installed and the solar STC-DC rating in watts or kilowatts
as captured by Participating Contractor
v. Estimated energy and water savings (in appropriate
units) associated with the project
vi.
b. If available (in the aggregate):
i. Amount of rebate or incentive dollars associated with
the project (not financed) and the name of the program
ii. How the customer heard about PACE financing
iii. Why the customer selected PACE over other financing
instruments available
iv. Why the customer selected their final PACE Provider
over the other members
The Participating Entity will:
Maintain the privacy and security of data received from PACE Provider. Participating
Entity shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations and applicable
California Public Utilities Commission regulations. Participating Entity may only provide
reports relating to Section 2.S.3(a)(ii)-(v) for public distribution that aggregate the data
such that individual customer information cannot be identified, unless such customer
has authorized written release of individual customer information. A Participating Entity
shall not share with any third party the data and reports by a Provider
pursuant to Section 2.5.3(b) (if
2.5.4 Provide the required in
PACE Financing program to Participating officials.
2.5.5 Provide support to Participating Entity's staff to facilitate adoption of
required participation documents.
2.6 ABAG will encourage Participating Entity to offer resources and
support to bring forward to their "'~I-T"",'.o boards or
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 202
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
•
•
•
•
•
•
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 213
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the Indemnitees; or the PACE Provider
shall satisfy any such deductibles or self-insured retentions. In addition, policies
containing any self-insured retention (SIR) provision shall provide or be endorsed to
provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named Insured or any of the
Indemnitees.
(d) Other Insurance Provisions. The commercial general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(i) The Indemnitees are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability
arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of PACE Provider;
completed operations; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
PACE Provider.
(ii) For any claims related to this project, the PACE Provider's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the Indemnitees.
(iii) Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Indemnitees shall be
excess of PACE Provider's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(iv) Except for General Liability and Automobile Liability, each insurance policy
required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be
canceled by either party, except after thirty(30) days' prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to ABAG. For General
Liability and Automobile Liability, PACE Provider shall provide ABAG with thirty
(30) day's prior notice of cancellation by either the insurer or PACE Provider.
(v) Coverage shall not extend to any defense or indemnity coverage for the
active negligence of the Indemnitees in any case where an agreement to defend
and indemnify the Indemnitees would be invalid under Subdivision (b) of Section
2782 of the Civil Code.
(e) Other Insurance Provisions -Workers Compensation.
Compensation insurance shall endorsed to
Indemnitees,
(f) Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed
A.M. Best's rating of no than A: VII, unless otherwise
a current
to ABAG.
(g) Verification of Coverage. PACE Provider shall furnish the ABAG with original
certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required by this
clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be and approved by ABAG
commences. ABAG reserves to
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 216
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
copies of all required insurance including endorsements the
coverage required by these specifications at any time.
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 217
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
AGREEMENT FOR COLLABORATIVE SERVICES
FOR PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY FINANCING
This Agreement for Collaborative Services ("Agreement"L dated as of
I 2016 ({{Effective Date Jl
) is by and among the Association of Bay Area Governments
(hereinafter "ABAG"L Western Riverside Council of Governments (hereinafter "PACE
Provider")' as an entity administering a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing
program utilizing either the California Assembly Bill 811 and/or California Senate Bill
model and any Participating Entity, as defined in Section 1.3 below, that adopts this
Agreement.
WHEREAS, ABAG is committed to mitigating and adapting to the causes and impacts of
climate change and supporting energy independence from fossil fuels to safeguard the
environment, human health and the economy; and
WHEREAS, ABAG as Program Administrator for the Bay Area Regional Energy Network
(BayREN), works closely with 101 cities in the nine county Bay Area region (ABAG
territory) to develop and implement innovative energy efficiency programs, including
supporting commercial and residential Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE)
programs; and
WHEREAS, the BayREN offers programs, technical resources and education for energy
upgrades and retrofits; and
WHEREAS, the objective of the BayREN is to help property owners save energy, save
money, and live comfortably; and
WHEREAS, the BayREN to assist local governments to understand all aspects of
partnering with PACE Providers in order to minimize customer confusion, provide access
to education and information to property owners and assist with informed
decisions on rebates and incentives, contractor programs, and financing options; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider is willing to participate to support community climate
goals and minimize consumer and contractor confusion; and
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 218
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
WHEREAS, the Provider will provide support and resources to any Participating
Entity as requested related to education, outreach and development of the energy
industry and trades; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will support, align and integrate its efforts with the
community-wide goals for job creation, resource demand reduction, and renewable
energy generation; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will establish its own interest rates, repayment terms, and
fees as state and federal laws and the market defines and allows; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will arrange for the collection of Property Assessed Clean
Energy assessments it has financed directly with the Participating Entity's County Tax
Collector's Office; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement does not include any financial arrangements between the
PACE Provider, ABAG and the Participating Entity adopting this Agreement, nor does it
preclude any separate contracts, contract terms for services or support; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the mutual understandings
between ABAG and the PACE Provider and to establish basic operating procedures for
any PACE provider operating within the ABAG territory, and any Participating Entity that
adopts this agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1 Definitions.
1.1 "Eligible improvement" is a technology, product or tool officially approved by
PACE improvements include distributed
renewable energy sources, energy and water efficiency improvements, and
electric vehicle charging infrastructure improvements that will be permanently
affixed to real property, and any additional improvements deemed eligible in
the future by the California Legislature and/or the California Judiciary.
1.2 "PACE Provider" is an entity participating in ABAG territory administering a
program providing Property Clean (PACE) financing.
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 219
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
discuss with Participating Entity and/or to review the quality of the work and
resolve matters of concern; (b) terminate this Agreement pursuant to the
provisions of . or (c) pursue any and all other remedies
available to ABAG at law or in equity.
The PACE Provider will:
2.3.1 Include a process to receive acknowledgement and confirmation of
satisfaction with work completed from the applicant before project
payment is disbursed and have a published dispute resolution process
available for customers.
2.3.2 Provide summary of financing details (including assessment or special tax
amount and terms, financing installments and estimated administrative
expenses) to the applicant specific to the requested amount of the
financing.
2.3.3 For residential properties, require an applicant's acknowledgment of the
Federal Housing Finance Agency position on PACE by a separate
signature/initial acknowledgement, in a Residential Disclosure Signature
Form that is substantially similar in content to Attachment l(a) or l(b), as
approved by ABAG.
2.3.4 Provide training to contractors and information to property owners on
the availability of rebates (for all utility and generation typesL including
and not limited to city and county rebate programs, BayREN programs,
PG&E programs, and other such offerings. (For information about local
programs, the contractor and/or home owner may be directed to the
BayREN Home Upgrade Advisor at 866-878-6008.)
2.3.5 Require that applicable building permits are obtained for all
improvements in Participating Entities.
2.3.6 Verify that all property taxes for the assessed property are current for the
previous three years or since the current owner acquired the property,
whichever is shorter.
2.3.7 Recommend that property owners consult with a tax professional prior to
claiming any tax deductions associated with the project and not
recommend that homeowners take any particular filing position
regarding their annual or semi-annual PACE assessment payments.
2.3.8 Not represent that the full assessment is tax deductible.
2.3.9 Have a consistent plan for removal of assessments at end of repayment
term, prepayment and/or in the event of program closure.
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 221
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
2.4
The PACE Provider will:
2.4.1 For programs offering residential PACE financing, be an active participant
in the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation
Financing Authority (CAEATFA) PACE loan loss Reserve Program or
comparable loan loss reserve program which includes at minimum the
parameters outlined in Attachment 2.
2.4.2 Notify ABAG six months in advance if funding capacity available from the
PACE Provider to prospective PACE customers in the Participating Entity
will fall below the amount dispersed in the previous six months of
operation.
2.4.3 Notify ABAG of any foreclosure action as a result of a default in the
payment of a PACE assessment on property within ABAG's geographical
boundaries, where the PACE assessment was originated by the PACE
Provider.
2.5 Documents, Data, and Information Policies.
The PACE Provider will:
2.5.1 Provide to Participating Entity (for internal evaluation purposes only and
not for distribution to any third party or for marketing purposes, other
than as required by law) by request of Participating Entity, electronic
access to the name, business name, and California State Contractors
license number of participating contractors of the PACE Provider's
program whose business address is located in the requesting
Participating Entity or who conduct business in the requesting
Participating Entity.
2.5.2 Retain completed Residential Disclosure (hardcopy or electronic) on file
for duration of assessment, and furnish to Participating Entity upon
request.
Provide upon request either direct real time access to data or quarterly
reports in an open electronic file format (such as Microsoft Excel) to
Entity by for internal evaluation purposes only (and
not for distribution to any third party, including, without limitation, utility
companies, services providers and equipment manufacturers or for
marketing purposes) that includes the following information for each
assessment:
a. Required data:
Number (APN)
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 222
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
iL Dollar amount financed (the amount of the assessment
and/or special tax)
iii. of all energy efficiency and water conservation
eligible improvements installed by virtue of the
financing, including the unit of measure for the
improvement and the quantity installed as captured by
Participating Contractor
iv. Listing of all renewable generation improvements
installed and the solar STC-DC rating in watts or kilowatts
as captured by Participating Contractor
v. Estimated energy and water savings (in appropriate
units) associated with the project
vi.
b. If available (in the aggregate):
i. Amount of rebate or incentive dollars associated with
the project (not financed) and the name of the program
ii. How the customer heard about PACE financing
iii. Why the customer selected PACE over other financing
instruments available
iv. Why the customer selected their final PACE Provider
over the other members
The Participating Entity will:
Maintain the privacy and security of data received from PACE Provider. Participating
Entity shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations and applicable
California Public Utilities Commission regulations. Participating Entity may only provide
reports relating to Section 2.S.3{a)(ii}-(v) for public distribution that aggregate the data
such that individual customer information cannot be identified, unless such customer
has authorized written release of individual customer information. A Participating Entity
shall not share with any third party the data and reports provided by a PACE Provider
pursuant to Section 2.S.3(b) (if any).
participation in Providers'
PACE Financing program to Participating Entity officials.
2.S.5 Provide support to Participating Entity's staff to facilitate adoption of
required participation documents.
2.6 ABAG will encourage Participating Entity to offer staff resources and
support to bring forward to their respective boards or councils the documents
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 223
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
provided by the PACE Provider required for participation in the PACE Provider's PACE
financing product.
2.7
The Parties will:
2.7.1 Collaborate on any local and/or regional efforts that may impact PACE
financing participation to achieve the best possible outcome for property
owners.
2.7.2 Represent the role of ABAG as the local neutral third party, not-for-profit,
public service agency supporting the public through the upgrade process,
with the following message to consumers: Among the financing products
available, competition is encouraged to the benefit of the consumer, with
the common goal of successful completion of projects.
The PACE Provider will:
2.7.3 Provide assistance to ABAG and any Participating Entity signing this
Agreement for: (1) coordinating and implementing the integration of the
PACE Provider into applicable BayREN and other relevant energy
efficiency programs; and (2) support of contractor training.
2.7.4 Provide specific training for participating contractors engaged with local
PACE programs using the PACE Provider's financing product, materials,
collateral, tools, and associated software, through training offered
directly from the PACE Provider.
2.7.5 Provide professional services, template documents, and other services
reasonably necessary to staff for integrating the PACE Provider's
financing option into the websites of any Participating Entity requesting
such assistance.
2.7.6 Provide training and resources to any Participating Entity as needed to
build understanding and support for use of the PACE financing product
ABAG will encourage ABAG members to:
2.7.7 products of PACE Providers in
all venues to the public.
2.7.8 Present marketing collateral of all financing products (where applicable)
with impartiality in education and outreach materials and events
2.8 PACE Providers Responsibilities Regarding .:.......;;;;.;~~;...::.:..:.,.~::...=...;...:...;:;.;....;:;..;;;...::..;=-.:..
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 224
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
•
•
•
•
•
•
l012.pdf
l020.pdf
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 234
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
PACE Provider shall maintain insurance as required by this
contract to the fullest amount allowed by law and shall maintain insurance for a period
of five (5) years following the completion of this project. PACE Provider shall provide a
copy of section 21 of this contract and these insurance requirements to its insurance
broker or insurer to confirm compliance. In the event PACE Provider fails to obtain or
maintain completed operations coverage as required by this agreement, ABAG, at its
sole discretion, may purchase the coverage required and the cost will be paid by PACE
Provider. The limits of insurance required in hereunder may be satisfied by a
combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess
insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall
also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Indemnitees (if
agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the any Indemnitee's own
Insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
(a) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence Form CG 0001).
Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering Automobile Liability, Code 1
(any auto}.
Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's
Liability Insurance.
Errors and Omissions Liability insurance appropriate to the PACE Provider's profession.
Architects' and engineers' coverage is to be endorsed to include contractual liability.
(b) Minimum Limits of Insurance. PACE Provider shall maintain limits no less than:
General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and
property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a
general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately
to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required
occurrence limit.
Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
Errors and Omissions Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate.
(c) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions
must to and insurer shall or such
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 236
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the Indemnitees; or the PACE Provider
shall satisfy any such deductibles or self-insured retentions. In addition, policies
containing any self-insured retention (SIR) provision shall provide or be endorsed to
provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named Insured or any of the
Indemnitees.
(d) Other Insurance Provisions. The commercial general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(i) The Indemnitees are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability
arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of PACE Provider;
completed operations; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
PACE Provider.
(ii) For any claims related to this project, the PACE Provider's insurance coverage
shall be primary insurance as respects the Indemnitees.
(iii) Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Indemnitees shall be
excess of PACE Provider's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(iv) Except for General Liability and Automobile Liability, each insurance policy
required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be
canceled by either party, except after thirty(30) days' prior written notice by
certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to ABAG. For General
Liability and Automobile Liability, PACE Provider shall provide ABAG with thirty
(30) day's prior notice of cancellation by either the insurer or PACE Provider.
(v) Coverage shall not extend to any defense or indemnity coverage for the
active negligence of the Indemnitees in any case where an agreement to defend
and indemnify the Indemnitees would be invalid under Subdivision (b) of Section
2782 of the Civil Code.
(e) Other Insurance Provisions -Workers Compensation. The Workers
Compensation insurance shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against the
Indemnitees.
(f) Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best's rating of no less than A: VII, unless otherwise acceptable to ABAG.
(g) Verification of Coverage. PACE Provider shall furnish the ABAG with original
certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required by this
clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by ABAG
before work commences. ABAG reserves the right to require complete, certified
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 237
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the
coverage required by these specifications at any time.
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 238
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
AGREEMENT FOR COLLABORATIVE SERVICES
FOR PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY FINANCING
This Agreement for Collaborative Services ("Agreement"), dated as of March 21L..2016
("Effective Date") is by and among the Association of Bay Area Governments
(hereinafter "ABAG"), Ygrene Energy Fund California LLC, (hereinafter "PACE Provider"),
as an entity administering a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing program
utilizing either the California Assembly Bill 811 and/or California Senate Bill 555 model
and any Participating Entity, as defined in Section 1.3 below, that adopts this
Agreement.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, ABAG is committed to mitigating and adapting to the causes and impacts of
climate change and supporting energy independence from fossil fuels to safeguard the
environment, human health and the economy; and
WHEREAS, ABAG as Program Administrator for the Bay Area Regional Energy Network
(BayREN), works closely with 101 cities in the nine county Bay Area region (A BAG
territory) to develop and implement innovative energy efficiency programs, including
supporting commercial and residential Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE)
programs; and
WHEREAS, the BayREN offers programs, technical resources and education for energy
upgrades and retrofits; and
WHEREAS, the objective of the BayREN is to help property owners save energy, save
money, and live comfortably; and
WHEREAS, the BayREN seeks to assist local governments to understand all aspects of
partnering with PACE Providers in order to minimize customer confusion, provide access
to education and information to property owners and assist with making informed
decisions on rebates and incentives, contractor programs, and financing options; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider is willing to participate to support community climate
goals and minimize consumer and contractor confusion; and
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 239
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will provide support and resources to any Participating
Entity as requested related to education, outreach and development of the energy
upgrade industry and trades; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will support, align and integrate its efforts with the
community-wide goals for job creation, resource demand reduction, and renewable
energy generation; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will establish its own interest rates, repayment terms, and
fees as state and federal laws and the market defines and allows; and
WHEREAS, the PACE Provider will arrange for the collection of Property Assessed Clean
Energy assessments it has financed directly with the Participating Entity's County Tax
Collector's Office; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement does not include any financial arrangements between the
PACE Provider, ABAG and the Participating Entity adopting this Agreement, nor does it
preclude any separate contracts, contract terms for services or support; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the mutual understandings
between ABAG and the PACE Provider and to establish basic operating procedures for
any PACE provider operating within the ABAG territory, and any Participating Entity that
adopts this agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1 Definitions.
1.1 "Eligible improvement" is a technology, product or tool officially approved by
the PACE provider. The improvements may include distributed generation
renewable energy sources, energy and water efficiency improvements, and
electric vehicle charging infrastructure improvements that will be permanently
affixed to real property, and any additional improvements deemed eligible in
the future by the California Legislature and/or the California Judiciary.
1.2 "PACE Provider" is an entity participating in ABAG territory administering a
program providing Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing.
&
20f20
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 240
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
a. Required data:
i. Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) of the property
ii. Dollar amount financed (the amount of the assessment
and/or special tax)
iii. Listing of all energy efficiency and water conservation
eligible improvements installed by virtue of the
financing, including the unit of measure for the
improvement and the quantity installed as captured by
Participating Contractor
iv. Listing of all renewable generation improvements
installed and the solar STC-DC rating in watts or kilowatts
as captured by Participating Contractor
v. Estimated energy and water savings (in appropriate
units) associated with the project
b. If available (in the aggregate):
i. Amount of rebate or incentive dollars associated with
the project (not financed) and the name of the program
ii. How the customer heard about PACE financing
iii. Why the customer selected PACE over other financing
instruments available
iv. Why the customer selected their final PACE Provider
over the other members
The Participating Entity will:
Maintain the privacy and security of data received from PACE Provider. Participating
Entity shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations and applicable
California Public Utilities Commission regulations. Participating Entity may only provide
reports relating to Section 2.5.3(a)(ii}-(v) for public distribution that aggregate the data
such that individual customer information cannot be identified, unless such customer
has authorized written release of individual customer information. A Participating Entity
shall not share with any third party the data and reports provided by a PACE Provider
pursuant to Section 2.5.3(b) (if any).
2.5.4 Provide the documents required for participation in the PACE
Providers' PACE Financing program to Participating Entity officials.
6of20
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 244
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
•
•
•
•
•
•
ABAG&
4.3.p
Packet Pg. 255
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
6
.
C
o
m
p
e
n
d
i
u
m
o
f
F
u
l
l
y
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
R
C
S
A
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
(
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
e
d
C
l
e
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
Page 1 of 5
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter
Ending September 30, 2017
Prepared by: Jay Baksa, Financial Analyst
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive an informational report of the City’s investments through
the quarter ending September 30, 2017 including a monthly transaction ledger. The
City’s investment portfolio for this period totaled $218,372,564 (book value) with an
average market yield of 1.51%. As required by the Policy, the City Treasurer
(Administrative Services Director) affirms that the City is able to meet its expenditure
requirements for the next six months.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Investments are made in accordance with the City Investment Policy and State
Law. Interest earned is apportioned between funds (i.e. General Fund, Gas Tax
Fund, etc.) based upon their proportionate share of the total cash balance. Based
on the financial needs of the City including the timing of receipt of revenues and
payment of expenditures, the quarterly cash balance can vary from quarter to quarter.
On November 7, 2017, the City Council approved as part of the First Quarter Budget
Review, a budget adjustment of $450,000, to account for additional projected interest
revenue. This report does not include an additional adjustment to the budget for interest
revenue.
DESCRIPTION:
The total investment portfolio of $218,372,564 (book value) is comprised of
$158,285,369 managed by Chandler Asset Management (Chandler), and $60,087,195
invested by the City in local government pools. The average market yield of the
Chandler portfolio and the local pools was 1.66% and 1.13% respectively. The total
investment portfolio balance fluctuates throughout the year due to normal cash flow
4.4
Packet Pg. 259
Page 2 of 5
needs and includes both discretionary and restricted funds.
Economic Update Highlights
The following are some highlights from the Economic Update included in the attached
Investment Report prepared by Chandler (Attachment 1).
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) left the fed funds target rate unchanged
at a range of 1.00% - 1.25% at the September meeting. The Federal Reserve’s (Fed)
updated economic projections still indicate one more rate hike before the year end,
however, the Fed lowered its median longer-run fed funds rate projection to 2.8% from
3.0% The Fed’s other economic projections were little changed, although the median
2018 inflation forecast was lowered slightly, suggesting the FOMC now thinks inflation
may remain below the Fed’s 2.0% target until 2019.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew by 3.0% in the third quarter, following growth of
3.1% in the second quarter and 1.2% in the first quarter. The consensus forecast
currently calls for GDP growth of about 2.7% in the current quarter. Tax reform or fiscal
stimulus may ultimately help fuel even stronger economic growth, but the timing and
magnitude of such programs remains uncertain.
The Treasury yield curve steepened in September, partially reversing some of the
curve flattening that has happened year-to-date. The 2-year Treasury yield increased
16 basis points in September to 1.48% and the 10-year Treasury yield increased 22
basis points to 2.33%. On a year-to-date basis, the 2-year Treasury yield increased 29
basis points and the 10-year Treasury yield declined 11 basis points.
City of Dublin Portfolio
The City's portfolio managed by Chandler has maintained a healthy balance of
investment types. As illustrated in Chart 1 below, the City utilized a large portion ($10
million) of funds held in the Local Government Investment Pools to meet cash flow
needs. This leaves overall funding levels with Chandler relatively unchanged, giving the
City the opportunity to earn a higher rate of return on the majority of its funds.
4.4
Packet Pg. 260
Page 3 of 5
Chart 1: Investments by Type, June 30, 2017 - September 30, 2017
The market value of the City's portfolio decreased $12.3 million since June 30, 2017
(see Table 1 below), but increased $10.1 million from the same quarter the prior year.
The quarter-over-quarter decrease in the City’s cash balance was due to large
payments made for two of the City’s Capital Improvement Projects (Dougherty Road
Improvements and Fallon Sports Park Phase II).
Table 1: Portfolio Values and Yield to Maturity
4.4
Packet Pg. 261
Page 4 of 5
Overall market yield-to-maturity (YTM) increased from 1.44% to 1.51%, as shown in
Table 2 below. For detailed monthly transactions, see Attachment 2.
Table 2: Quarterly Holdings (Par Value) by Type, and YTM, 5 Quarters
Funds Managed by the City
The City participates in two local agency investment pools managed by government
finance professionals and treasurers: the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the
California Asset Management Program (CAMP). The City has typically carried close to
the $50 million maximum allowable in LAIF with any excesses resulting from the timing
of large payments deposited into CAMP as a temporary holding place. As shown in
Table 3, the quarterly LAIF yield continues to increase, signifying the relative health of
the current economic climate.
Table 3: Quarterly LAIF Yields, Recent Seven Years and Three Quarters
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending September 2017
2. Transaction Ledger - July - September 2017
4.4
Packet Pg. 262
Page 5 of 5
4.4
Packet Pg. 263
6225 Lusk Blvd | San Diego, CA 92121 | Phone 800.317.4747 | Fax 858.546.3741 | www.chandlerasset.com
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT
Period Ending
September 30, 2017
City of Dublin
Investment Report
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 264
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Table of Contents
SECTION 1 Economic Update
SECTION 2 Account Profile
SECTION 3 Consolidated Information
SECTION 4 Portfolio Holdings
SECTION 5 Transactions
1
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 265
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
SECTION 1
Economic Update
2
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 266
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
GDPgrew by 3.0%in thethirdquarter,followinggrowth of 3.1%in thesecondquarter and 1.2%in thefirstquarter.
TheconsensusforecastcurrentlycallsforGDPgrowth ofabout 2.7%in thecurrentquarter.Taxreform or fiscal
stimulusmayultimatelyhelpfuelevenstrongereconomicgrowth,but thetiming and magnitude of suchprograms
remains uncertain.
Economic Update
TheTreasuryyieldcurvesteepened in September,partiallyreversingsome of thecurveflatteningthat hashappened
year-to-date.The2-yearTreasuryyieldincreased 16 basispoints in September to 1.48%and the10-yearTreasury
yieldincreased about22 basispoints to 2.33%.On ayear-to-datebasis,the2-yearTreasuryyieldincreased 29 basis
points and the10-yearTreasuryyielddeclined 11 basispoints.Sincethebeginning of thisyear,we believemarket
participantshavegrownskepticalthattheTrumpadministrationwilldeliver on many of theirlegislativeobjectives.
However,theadministrationrecentlyoutlinedageneralframeworkfortaxreform,sparkingsomerenewedoptimism
that changes to the tax code may help boost economic growth.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) left the fed funds target rate unchanged at a range of 1.00%-1.25% at
the September 19-20 meeting. As expected, the Committee announced plans to initiate the balance sheet
normalization program in October. The process of unwinding the Fed’s $4.5 trillion balance sheet will begin gradually
by allowing $6 billion per month in Treasury securities and $4 billion per month in mortgage-backed and agency
securities to roll off the balance sheet. Over time, the amounts will slowly increase to $30 billion per month in Treasury
securities and $20 billion per month in mortgage-backed and agency securities. The Fed’s plans to unwind the
balance sheet was widely telegraphed and the policy statement was generally in line with expectations. There were no
dissenting votes among FOMC members in September. The Fed’s updated economic projections still indicate one
more rate hike before year-end is expected. However, the Fed lowered its median longer-run fed funds rate projection
to 2.8% from 3.0%. The Fed’s other economic projections were little changed, although the median 2018 inflation
forecast was lowered slightly, suggesting that the Committee now thinks inflation may remain below the Fed’s 2.0%
target until 2019.
3
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 267
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
U.S.payrollsdeclined33,000 in September,wellbelowthe+80,000consensusestimate.However,Septemberpayrollswerelikely
significantlydistorted by thehurricanes.Theunemploymentratedecreased to 4.2%in Septemberfrom4.4%in August,and thelabor
participationrateincreased to 63.1%from62.9%.Abroadermeasure of unemploymentcalledtheU-6,whichincludesthosewhoare
marginallyattached to thelaborforce and employedparttimeforeconomicreasons,declined to 8.3%from8.6%.Wagesjumped0.5%
in September. On a year-over-year basis wages were up 2.9% in September, versus up 2.7% year-over-year in August.
Employment
Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
M
O
M
C
h
a
n
g
e
I
n
(
0
0
0
'
s
)
Nonfarm Payroll (000's)
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
Unemployment Rate
Underemployment Rate (U6)
Unemployment Rate (U3)
Ra
t
e
(
%
)
4
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 268
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
TheConsumerPriceIndex(CPI)was up 2.2%year-over-year in September,versus up 1.9%year-over-year in August.CoreCPI(CPI
lessfood and energy)was up just1.7%year-over-year in September,unchangedforthepastfiveconsecutivemonths.Theincrease in
headlineCPIinflationwasdriven in part byan increase in energypricesfollowingthehurricanes.ThePersonalConsumption
Expenditures(PCE)indexwas up 1.6%year-over-year in September,versus up 1.4%year-over-year in August.However,CorePCE
(excludingfood and energy)wasunchanged on ayear-over-yearbasis in September,up just1.3%.InflationremainsbelowtheFed's
2.0% target.
Inflation
Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor
-0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
CPI YOY % Change
Core CPI YOY % Change
YO
Y
(
%
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
-0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
Personal Consumption Expenditures
(PCE)
PCE Price Deflator YOY % Change
PCE Core Deflator YOY % Change
YO
Y
(
%
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
5
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 269
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
On ayear-over-yearbasis,retailsaleswere up 4.4%in September,versus up 3.5%year-over-year in August.On amonth-over-month
basis,retailsalesincreased1.6%in September,followinga0.1%decline in August.Theincrease in Septemberretailsaleswas
generally in linewithexpectations,and wasdriven in largepart by asurge in hurricane-relatedreplacementdemandforvehicles as well
as aspike in post-hurricanegasolineprices.However,excludingautos and gas,retailsalesgrew at amoderatepace,up 0.5%in
September,month-over-month.Meanwhile,theconsumerconfidenceindexremainedstrong in September at 119.8versus120.4 in
August, despite weakness in the hurricane states of Texas and Florida.
Consumer
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: Federal Reserve
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
Retail Sales YOY % Change
YO
Y
(
%
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
In
d
e
x
L
e
v
e
l
Consumer Confidence
6
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 270
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
TheIndex of LeadingEconomicIndicators(LEI)declined0.2%in September,followinga0.4%increase in August and a0.3%increase
in July.It wasthefirstmonthlydecline in morethanayear.However,six of thetenindexcomponentsmadepositivecontributions,and
thosethatmadenegativecontributionswerelikelydistorted by thehurricanes.On ayear-over-yearbasis,theLEIwas up 4.0%in
September,versus up 4.4%in August.According to theConferenceBoard,“thetrend in the US LEIremainsconsistentwithcontinuing
solid growth in the US economy for the second half of the year.” Meanwhile, the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) improved in
September to 0.17from-0.37 in August.However,on a3-monthmovingaveragebasis,theindexheld at -0.16 in September.Thethree
monthmovingaverage,whichsmooths out some of themonthlyvolatility,points to subpareconomicgrowth.Overall,we believethe
economy remains on a slow growth trajectory.
Economic Activity
-0.4%
-0.3%
-0.2%
-0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
0.7%
Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)
M
O
M
(
%
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
Chicago Fed National Activity Index
(CFNAI)
3
M
o
n
t
h
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
Source: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
7
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 271
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Totalhousingstartswereweakerthanexpected in September,down4.7%.Single-familystartsdecreased4.6%in September,while
multi-familystartsdeclined5.1%.Permitswerealsoslightlyweakerthanexpected in September,down4.5%,due to weakness in multi-
familypermits.Overall,Septemberhousingstartsweresoft,but activitymayrebound in thefourthquarter as hurricane-related
rebuildingeffortsintensify.According to theCase-Shiller20-Cityhomepriceindex,homepriceswere up 5.8%year-over-year in July,
versus up 5.6% year-over-year in June.
Housing
Source: US Census Bureau Source: S&P
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
M
O
M
C
h
a
n
g
e
(
I
n
T
h
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
o
f
U
n
i
t
s
)
Housing Starts
Multi Family Housing Starts
Single Family Housing Starts
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
6.0%
6.5%
S&P/CaseShiller 20 City Composite Home
Price Index
YO
Y
(
%
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
8
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 272
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
TheInstituteforSupplyManagement(ISM)manufacturingindexincreased to 60.8 in Septemberfrom58.0 in August.Areadingabove
50.0suggeststhemanufacturingsector is expanding.However,IndustrialProductionwas up just1.6%year-over-year in September
versus up 1.2%year-over-year in August.AlthoughtheISMManufacturingindex(which is based on asurveyfromarelativelysmall
sample size of roughly 300 manufacturing firms) has been quite strong, Industrial Production has been lackluster.
Manufacturing
Source: Institute for Supply Management Source: Federal Reserve
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
Institute of Supply Management Purchasing
Manager Index
Expanding
Contracting
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
Industrial Production
YO
Y
(
%
)
C
h
a
n
g
e
9
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 273
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
ThirdquarterGDPgrew at abetterthanexpectedannualizedrate of 3.0%.An increase in inventoriesboostedthirdquartereconomic
growth,whichmayreverse in thefourthquarter.Nevertheless,thethirdquarterGDPreportwassolid,withmuch of thegrowthdriven
by personalconsumptionexpenditures.Spending on durable goods wasparticularlystrong in thequarter,whichmayreflecthurricane-
related demand for replacement vehicles.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce
12/163/176/179/17
2.0%1.3%2.2%1.6%
1.3%-0.2%0.6%1.0%
-1.6%0.2%0.2%0.4%
0.0%-0.2%0.1%0.1%
0.1%0.1%-0.2%-0.1%
1.8%1.2%3.1%3.0%
Federal Government Expenditures
Total
Net Exports and Imports
Personal Consumption Expenditures
Gross Private Domestic Investment
State and Local (Consumption and Gross
Investment)
Components of GDP
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
GDP QOQ % Change
GDP YOY % Change
10
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 274
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Source: Bloomberg
The yield curve has flattened meaningfully this year. The spread between 2-year and 10-year Treasury yields was just 85 basis points at
the endof September,compared to 126at the endof2016.In thethreemonthsending in September,the2-yearTreasuryyield
increased about tenbasispointswhilethe10-yearTreasuryyieldincreasedjustthreebasispoints.Immediatelyfollowingthe US
Presidentialelectionlastfall,theTreasuryyieldcurvesteepenedmeaningfully,driven by heightenedexpectationsfortaxreform,fiscal
stimulus,and above-trendeconomicgrowth under theTrumpadministration.However,marketparticipantsareskepticaltheTrump
administration will deliver on their legislative agenda.
Bond Yields
Source: Bloomberg
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
US Treasury Note Yields
2-Year
5-Year
10-Year
Yi
e
l
d
(
%
)
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
US Treasury Yield Curve
Sep-17
Jun-17
Sep-16
Yi
e
l
d
(
%
)
11
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 275
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
SECTION 2
Account Profile
12
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 276
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Objectives
Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective
The performance objective of the City of Dublin is to earn a return that equals or exceeds the return on of the
Bank of America Merrill Lynch 1-5 Year Treasury and Agency Index.
Investment Objectives
The investment objectives of the City of Dublin are first, to provide safety of principal; second, to provide
adequate liquidity to meet all requirements which might be reasonably anticipated; third, to attain a market
average rate of return on its investments throughout economic cycles; and fourth, to be diversified to avoid
incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual financial
institutions.
Strategy
In order to achieve this objective, the portfolio invests in high quality fixed income instruments consistent with
the City's investment policy and California Government Code.
13
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 277
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Compliance
Category Standard Comment
Treasury Issues No limitations Complies
Agency Issues 35% max per issuer; 25% max callables Complies
Supranationals "AA" rated or equivalent by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per
issuer; USD denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated
obligations issued by: IBRD, IFC, IADB
Complies
Municipal Securities "A" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 5% max per issuer Complies
Medium Term Notes "A" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer;
Issued by corporations organized and operating within the U.S. or by
depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating
within the U.S.
Complies
Banker’s Acceptances "A-1" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 40% maximum; 5% max per issuer;
20% max amount invested in BA with any one financial institution in
combination with any other debt from that financial institution; 180 days
max maturity
Complies
Commercial Paper "A-1" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 25% maximum; 5% max per issuer;
20% max amount invested in CP of any one issuer in combination with
any other debt from that issuer; 270 days max maturity
Complies
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit "A" or better long term debt rating and/or "A-1" or higher short term
rating by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 20% max
amount invested in NCDs with any one financial institution in
combination with any other debt from that financial institution.
Complies
Time Deposits/ Certificates of
Deposit
10% max; Collateralized/FDIC Insured; 1 year max maturity Complies
Asset-Backed and Mortgage-
Backed Securities (ABS/MBS)
"AA" rated or higher by a NRSRO; "A" rated or higher for the issuer's
debt by a NRSRO; 20% maximum; 5% max per issue
Complies
Money Market Mutual Funds and
Mutual Funds
Highest rating or "AAA" rated by two NRSROs; SEC registered
adviser with AUM >$500 million and experience greater than 5 years;
10% per one Mutual Fund; 20% maximum in Money Market Mutual
Funds; 20% maximum combined of total portfolio in these securities
Complies
LAIF Max program limit Complies
CAMP Not used by adviser Complies
Max Per Issuer 5% (except US Government, Agencies and its instrumentalities
including agency backed-mortgage pools, Money Market Mutual Funds)
Complies
Maximum Maturity 5 years Complies
City of Dublin
September 30, 2017
COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTMENT POLICY
Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and with the City's investment policy.
14
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 278
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Portfolio Characteristics
City of Dublin
9/30/2017 6/30/2017
Benchmark* Portfolio Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 2.69 2.57 2.65
Modified Duration 2.58 2.41 2.45
Average Purchase Yield n/a 1.60% 1.54%
Average Market Yield 1.61% 1.66% 1.62%
Average Quality** AAA AA/Aa1 AA/Aa1
Total Market Value 158,631,241 158,015,885
*BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index
**Benchmark is a blended rating of S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively.
15
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 279
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
ABS
5.1%
Agency
36.8%
Commercial
Paper
2.0%
Money Market
Fund FI
0.2%
US Corporate
22.4%
US Treasury
31.8%
Negotiable CD
1.8%
Sector Distribution
City of Dublin
September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017
ABS
6.6%
Agency
37.6%
Commercial
Paper
1.9% Money Market
Fund FI
0.3%
US Corporate
22.4%
US Treasury
31.3%
16
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 280
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Issuers
City of Dublin – Account #10198 As of 9/30/2017
Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio
Government of United States US Treasury 31.77%
Federal National Mortgage Association Agency 15.90%
Federal Home Loan Bank Agency 14.96%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Agency 5.95%
John Deere ABS ABS 2.05%
Bank of Tokyo-Mit UFJ Commercial Paper 1.99%
Bank of Nova Scotia Houston Negotiable CD 1.75%
Pepsico Inc US Corporate 1.75%
ChevronTexaco Corp US Corporate 1.74%
Honda ABS ABS 1.61%
US Bancorp US Corporate 1.28%
Qualcomm Inc US Corporate 1.28%
Chubb Corporation US Corporate 1.28%
Wells Fargo Corp US Corporate 1.22%
Microsoft US Corporate 1.15%
Honda Motor Corporation US Corporate 1.15%
JP Morgan Chase & Co US Corporate 1.15%
Exxon Mobil Corp US Corporate 1.15%
State Street Bank US Corporate 1.14%
Deere & Company US Corporate 1.12%
Bank of New York US Corporate 1.11%
Apple Inc US Corporate 1.11%
Eli Lilly & Co US Corporate 1.00%
HSBC USA Corp US Corporate 0.96%
Cisco Systems US Corporate 0.86%
Oracle Corp US Corporate 0.81%
Nissan ABS ABS 0.73%
Toyota ABS ABS 0.70%
Berkshire Hathaway US Corporate 0.64%
General Electric Co US Corporate 0.48%
17
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 281
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Issuers
City of Dublin – Account #10198 As of 9/30/2017
Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio
First American Govt Oblig Fund Money Market Fund FI 0.23%
Total 100.00%
18
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 282
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
AAA AA A <A NR
09/30/17 2.7% 80.1% 13.4% 0.0% 3.8%
06/30/17 4.3% 78.5% 13.5% 0.0% 3.7%
Source: S&P Ratings
Quality Distribution
September 30, 2017 vs. June 30, 2017
City of Dublin
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
AAA AA A <A NR
9/30/2017 6/30/2017
19
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 283
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+
City of Dublin BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index
Duration Distribution
City of Dublin
Portfolio Compared to the Benchmark as of September 30, 2017
0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+
Portfolio 4.6% 7.8% 10.5% 15.6% 23.2% 23.4% 14.9% 0.0%
Benchmark* 0.1% 0.0% 1.7% 32.7% 28.4% 22.4% 14.8% 0.0%
*BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index
20
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 284
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Investment Performance
-0.20%
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
1.40%
12 months 2 years 3 years 5 years 10 years Since Inception
City of Dublin City of Dublin Custom Index*
City of Dublin
Period Ending
September 30, 2017
Total Rate of Return
Annualized Since Inception
October 31, 2013
Annualized
3 months 12 months 2 years 3 years 5 years 10 years Since
Inception
City of Dublin 0.39% 0.43% 1.11% 1.30% N/A N/A 1.12%
BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index 0.29% -0.04% 0.74% 1.09% N/A N/A 0.94%
*BAML 1-3 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index to 12/31/2014
Total rate of return: A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time. It is the internal rate of return, which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value; it includes
interest earnings, realized and unrealized gains and losses in the portfolio.
21
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 285
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Portfolio Characteristics
City of Dublin Reporting Account
9/30/2017 6/30/2017
Portfolio Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 0.00 0.00
Modified Duration 0.00 0.00
Average Purchase Yield 1.13% 1.05%
Average Market Yield 1.13% 1.05%
Average Quality AAA/NR NR/NR
Total Market Value 60,197,021 73,109,353
22
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 286
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
LAIF
66.9%
Local Gov
Investment Pool
33.1%
Sector Distribution
City of Dublin Reporting Account
September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017
LAIF
55.0%
Local Gov
Investment Pool
45.1%
23
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 287
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Issuers
City of Dublin Reporting Account – Account #10219 As of 9/30/2017
Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio
Local Agency Investment Fund LAIF 66.92%
CAMP Local Gov Investment Pool 33.08%
Total 100.00%
24
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 288
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
SECTION 3
Consolidated Information
25
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 289
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Portfolio Characteristics
City of Dublin Consolidated
9/30/2017 6/30/2017
Portfolio Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 1.87 1.81
Modified Duration 1.74 1.67
Average Purchase Yield 1.47% 1.39%
Average Market Yield 1.51% 1.44%
Average Quality AA+/Aa1 AA/Aa1
Total Market Value 218,828,262 231,125,238
26
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 290
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
ABS
3.7%
Agency
26.7%
Commercial
Paper
1.4%
LAIF
18.4% Local Gov
Investment Pool
9.1%
Money Market
Fund FI
0.2%
US Corporate
16.2%
US Treasury
23.0%
Negotiable CD
1.3%
Sector Distribution
City of Dublin Consolidated
September 30, 2017 June 30, 2017
ABS
4.5%
Agency
25.7%
Commercial
Paper
1.3%
LAIF
17.4%
Local Gov
Investment Pool
14.3%
Money Market
Fund FI
0.2%
US Corporate
15.3%
US Treasury
21.4%
27
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 291
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
SECTION 4
Portfolio Holdings
28
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 292
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Holdings Report
For the Month Ending 9/30/2017
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units
Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
89236WAC2 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2015-A
1.120% Due 02/15/2019
287,924.78 02/24/2015
0.60%
287,881.25
287,919.25
99.94
1.36%
287,759.07
143.32
0.18%
(160.18)
Aaa / AAA
NR
1.38
0.25
47788NAB4 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-B A2
1.090% Due 02/15/2019
704,478.82 07/19/2016
0.91%
704,435.85
704,455.70
99.94
1.40%
704,034.94
341.28
0.44%
(420.76)
Aaa / NR
AAA
1.38
0.20
43813NAC0 Honda Auto Receivables 2015-2 A3
1.040% Due 02/21/2019
491,259.05 05/13/2015
0.36%
491,183.64
491,231.15
99.89
1.45%
490,708.20
141.92
0.31%
(522.95)
NR / AAA
AAA
1.39
0.28
65478WAB1 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A2A
1.070% Due 05/15/2019
520,510.52 08/02/2016
0.83%
520,490.02
520,498.50
99.91
1.37%
520,054.82
247.53
0.33%
(443.68)
Aaa / NR
AAA
1.62
0.30
89231LAB3 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2016-D
1.060% Due 05/15/2019
821,316.81 10/04/2016
0.87%
821,251.10
821,275.72
99.88
1.39%
820,370.50
386.93
0.52%
(905.22)
Aaa / AAA
NR
1.62
0.35
43814TAB8 Honda Auto Receivables 2017-1 A2
1.420% Due 07/22/2019
807,014.91 03/21/2017
1.28%
806,995.63
806,999.89
99.96
1.50%
806,708.20
318.32
0.51%
(291.69)
Aaa / NR
AAA
1.81
0.53
47787XAB3 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-A A2
1.500% Due 10/15/2019
655,000.00 02/22/2017
1.50%
654,997.38
654,997.96
99.96
1.56%
654,757.00
436.67
0.41%
(240.96)
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.04
0.63
654747AB0 Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-A A2A
1.470% Due 01/15/2020
630,000.00 03/21/2017
1.47%
629,996.79
629,997.38
99.97
1.52%
629,830.53
411.60
0.40%
(166.85)
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.29
0.65
43814PAB6 Honda Auto Receivables Owner T 17-3 A2
1.570% Due 01/21/2020
460,000.00 09/25/2017
1.58%
459,959.11
459,959.21
99.99
1.58%
459,969.64
40.12
0.29%
10.43
NR / AAA
AAA
2.31
0.89
47788MAC4 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-A A3
1.360% Due 04/15/2020
1,115,000.00 02/23/2016
1.12%
1,114,824.50
1,114,891.90
99.83
1.60%
1,113,076.63
673.96
0.70%
(1,815.27)
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.54
0.73
43814QAC2 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-2 A3
1.390% Due 04/15/2020
805,000.00 05/24/2016
1.24%
804,984.38
804,989.77
99.81
1.61%
803,479.36
497.31
0.51%
(1,510.41)
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.54
0.87
47788BAB0 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A2A
1.590% Due 04/15/2020
455,000.00 07/11/2017
1.60%
454,960.46
454,963.42
99.94
1.66%
454,740.20
321.53
0.29%
(223.22)
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.54
0.92
47788BAD6 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.820% Due 10/15/2021
320,000.00 07/11/2017
1.83%
319,976.58
319,977.71
99.93
1.86%
319,789.44
258.84
0.20%
(188.27)
Aaa / NR
AAA
4.04
2.12
Total ABS 8,072,504.89 1.16%
8,071,936.69
8,072,157.56
1.52%
8,065,278.53
4,219.33
5.09%
(6,879.03)
Aaa / AAA
Aaa
2.09
0.63
Agency
313381B20 FHLB Note
0.750% Due 12/08/2017
2,000,000.00 12/13/2012
0.75%
1,999,980.00
1,999,999.25
99.94
1.08%
1,998,732.00
4,708.33
1.26%
(1,267.25)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.19
0.19
3135G0TG8 FNMA Note
0.875% Due 02/08/2018
3,000,000.00 01/21/2015
0.97%
2,991,390.00
2,998,994.34
99.87
1.25%
2,996,022.00
3,864.58
1.89%
(2,972.34)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.36
0.35
3137EADP1 FHLMC Note
0.875% Due 03/07/2018
3,000,000.00 01/27/2015
1.01%
2,987,610.00
2,998,284.63
99.86
1.20%
2,995,734.00
1,750.00
1.89%
(2,550.63)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.43
0.43
313378A43 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 03/09/2018
4,000,000.00 Various
0.96%
4,047,840.00
4,007,192.87
100.09
1.18%
4,003,492.00
3,361.12
2.53%
(3,700.87)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.44
0.44
313379DT3 FHLB Note
1.250% Due 06/08/2018
2,000,000.00 08/18/2015
1.12%
2,007,360.00
2,001,796.88
99.97
1.29%
1,999,490.00
7,847.22
1.27%
(2,306.88)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.69
0.68
City of Dublin - Account #10198
29
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 293
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Holdings Report
For the Month Ending 9/30/2017
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units
Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3135G0G72 FNMA Note
1.125% Due 12/14/2018
2,500,000.00 12/18/2015
1.37%
2,481,975.00
2,492,733.72
99.65
1.42%
2,491,312.50
8,359.38
1.58%
(1,421.22)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.21
1.19
3133782M2 FHLB Note
1.500% Due 03/08/2019
2,750,000.00 04/24/2015
1.21%
2,779,892.50
2,761,079.93
100.04
1.47%
2,751,168.75
2,635.42
1.74%
(9,911.18)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.44
1.42
3137EADG1 FHLMC Note
1.750% Due 05/30/2019
1,000,000.00 01/29/2015
1.28%
1,019,690.00
1,007,547.21
100.43
1.48%
1,004,345.00
5,881.94
0.64%
(3,202.21)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.66
1.63
3135G0ZG1 FNMA Note
1.750% Due 09/12/2019
2,500,000.00 10/28/2014
1.68%
2,508,350.00
2,503,337.18
100.42
1.53%
2,510,600.00
2,309.03
1.58%
7,262.82
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.95
1.91
3137EADM8 FHLMC Note
1.250% Due 10/02/2019
2,500,000.00 12/18/2015
1.64%
2,464,700.00
2,481,314.77
99.43
1.54%
2,485,680.00
15,538.19
1.58%
4,365.23
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.01
1.96
3135G0A78 FNMA Note
1.625% Due 01/21/2020
2,000,000.00 04/07/2015
1.44%
2,016,580.00
2,007,981.91
100.13
1.57%
2,002,522.00
6,319.44
1.27%
(5,459.91)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.31
2.25
313383HU8 FHLB Note
1.750% Due 06/12/2020
2,000,000.00 10/08/2015
1.46%
2,026,040.00
2,015,017.21
100.17
1.69%
2,003,316.00
10,597.22
1.27%
(11,701.21)
Aaa / AA+
NR
2.70
2.61
3135G0F73 FNMA Note
1.500% Due 11/30/2020
2,500,000.00 12/04/2015
1.87%
2,455,750.00
2,471,893.96
99.33
1.72%
2,483,242.50
12,604.17
1.57%
11,348.54
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.17
3.06
3130A7CV5 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 02/18/2021
3,470,000.00 Various
1.45%
3,457,221.20
3,461,310.33
98.97
1.69%
3,434,137.55
5,698.99
2.17%
(27,172.78)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.39
3.28
3135G0J20 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 02/26/2021
5,000,000.00 Various
1.29%
5,018,675.00
5,013,826.16
98.77
1.75%
4,938,440.00
6,684.02
3.12%
(75,386.16)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.41
3.31
313379RB7 FHLB Note
1.875% Due 06/11/2021
3,000,000.00 08/30/2017
1.67%
3,022,620.00
3,022,111.87
100.30
1.79%
3,009,039.00
17,187.50
1.91%
(13,072.87)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.70
3.54
3130A8QS5 FHLB Note
1.125% Due 07/14/2021
2,500,000.00 07/25/2016
1.28%
2,481,475.00
2,485,886.69
97.69
1.76%
2,442,170.00
6,015.63
1.54%
(43,716.69)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.79
3.68
3137EAEC9 FHLMC Note
1.125% Due 08/12/2021
3,000,000.00 Various
1.33%
2,971,215.00
2,977,435.43
97.46
1.81%
2,923,752.00
4,593.76
1.85%
(53,683.43)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.87
3.75
3135G0Q89 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 10/07/2021
2,000,000.00 10/06/2016
1.45%
1,992,924.00
1,994,315.17
98.11
1.86%
1,962,250.00
13,291.67
1.25%
(32,065.17)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.02
3.86
3135G0S38 FNMA Note
2.000% Due 01/05/2022
2,500,000.00 01/30/2017
2.04%
2,495,475.00
2,496,085.88
100.25
1.94%
2,506,352.50
11,944.44
1.59%
10,266.62
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.27
4.05
313378CR0 FHLB Note
2.250% Due 03/11/2022
2,000,000.00 06/19/2017
1.86%
2,035,280.00
2,033,173.43
101.31
1.94%
2,026,106.00
2,500.00
1.28%
(7,067.43)
Aaa / AA+
NR
4.45
4.21
3135G0T45 FNMA Note
1.875% Due 04/05/2022
3,250,000.00 05/05/2017
1.99%
3,232,125.00
3,233,580.52
99.77
1.93%
3,242,606.25
28,945.31
2.06%
9,025.73
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.52
4.27
Total Agency 58,470,000.00 1.41%
58,494,167.70
58,464,899.34
1.59%
58,210,510.05
182,637.36
36.81%
(254,389.29)
Aaa / AA+
Aaa
2.49
2.40
City of Dublin - Account #10198
30
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 294
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Holdings Report
For the Month Ending 9/30/2017
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units
Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
Commercial Paper
06538BY80 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi NY Discount CP
1.330% Due 11/08/2017
3,160,000.00 07/07/2017
1.35%
3,145,523.69
3,155,563.71
99.86
1.35%
3,155,563.71
0.00
1.99%
0.00
P-1 / A-1
NR
0.11
0.11
Total Commercial Paper 3,160,000.00 1.35%
3,145,523.69
3,155,563.71
1.35%
3,155,563.71
0.00
1.99%
0.00
P-1 / A-1
NR
0.11
0.11
Money Market Fund FI
31846V203 First American Govt Obligation Fund
367,387.22 Various
0.61%
367,387.22
367,387.22
1.00
0.61%
367,387.22
0.00
0.23%
0.00
Aaa / AAA
AAA
0.00
0.00
Total Money Market Fund FI 367,387.22 0.61%
367,387.22
367,387.22
0.61%
367,387.22
0.00
0.23%
0.00
Aaa / AAA
Aaa
0.00
0.00
Negotiable CD
06417GXH6 Bank of Nova Scotia Yankee CD
1.570% Due 08/09/2018
2,775,000.00 08/08/2017
1.57%
2,775,000.00
2,775,000.00
100.00
1.57%
2,775,000.00
6,414.10
1.75%
0.00
P-1 / A-1
NR
0.86
0.85
Total Negotiable CD 2,775,000.00 1.57%
2,775,000.00
2,775,000.00
1.57%
2,775,000.00
6,414.10
1.75%
0.00
Aaa / AA
NR
0.86
0.85
US Corporate
36962G6K5 General Electric Capital Corp Note
1.600% Due 11/20/2017
750,000.00 10/28/2014
1.31%
756,577.50
750,294.69
100.05
1.22%
750,387.75
4,366.67
0.48%
93.06
A1 / AA-
AA-
0.14
0.14
40428HPH9 HSBC USA Inc Note
1.625% Due 01/16/2018
500,000.00 11/25/2013
1.69%
498,705.00
499,908.30
100.04
1.49%
500,186.50
1,692.71
0.32%
278.20
A2 / A
AA-
0.30
0.29
713448CR7 PepsiCo Inc Note
1.250% Due 04/30/2018
1,430,000.00 Various
1.26%
1,429,428.40
1,429,889.87
99.92
1.39%
1,428,851.71
7,497.57
0.91%
(1,038.16)
A1 / A+
A
0.58
0.58
037833AJ9 Apple Inc Note
1.000% Due 05/03/2018
1,750,000.00 Various
1.34%
1,726,740.00
1,746,578.56
99.77
1.40%
1,745,905.00
7,194.44
1.11%
(673.56)
Aa1 / AA+
NR
0.59
0.59
166764AE0 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 5/24/2018
1.718% Due 06/24/2018
1,750,000.00 Various
1.57%
1,758,299.00
1,751,867.34
100.08
1.59%
1,751,450.75
8,100.85
1.11%
(416.59)
Aa2 / AA-
NR
0.73
0.64
06406HCL1 Bank of New York Callable Note Cont 7/2/2018
2.100% Due 08/01/2018
1,000,000.00 02/05/2014
1.94%
1,006,820.00
1,001,165.74
100.46
1.49%
1,004,570.00
3,500.00
0.64%
3,404.26
A1 / A
AA-
0.84
0.75
084664BY6 Berkshire Hathaway Note
2.000% Due 08/15/2018
1,000,000.00 12/12/2013
1.89%
1,004,960.00
1,000,926.72
100.49
1.43%
1,004,931.00
2,555.56
0.64%
4,004.28
Aa2 / AA
A+
0.87
0.86
17275RAR3 Cisco Systems Note
2.125% Due 03/01/2019
1,350,000.00 11/14/2014
2.05%
1,354,063.50
1,351,341.50
100.75
1.58%
1,360,191.15
2,390.63
0.86%
8,849.65
A1 / AA-
NR
1.42
1.39
532457BF4 Eli Lilly & Co Note
1.950% Due 03/15/2019
1,575,000.00 Various
1.91%
1,577,796.75
1,575,944.76
100.49
1.61%
1,582,692.30
1,365.00
1.00%
6,747.54
A2 / AA-
A
1.45
1.43
94974BFU9 Wells Fargo Corp Note
2.125% Due 04/22/2019
1,900,000.00 Various
2.07%
1,904,120.50
1,901,630.81
100.55
1.77%
1,910,448.10
17,832.28
1.22%
8,817.29
A2 / A
AA-
1.56
1.52
02665WAH4 American Honda Finance Note
2.250% Due 08/15/2019
1,800,000.00 Various
2.08%
1,812,627.00
1,805,553.69
100.79
1.82%
1,814,283.00
5,175.00
1.15%
8,729.31
A1 / A+
NR
1.87
1.83
City of Dublin - Account #10198
31
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 295
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Holdings Report
For the Month Ending 9/30/2017
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units
Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
06406HCW7 Bank of New York Callable Note Cont 8/11/2019
2.300% Due 09/11/2019
750,000.00 04/22/2015
1.82%
764,722.50
756,379.44
100.78
1.87%
755,818.50
958.33
0.48%
(560.94)
A1 / A
AA-
1.95
1.82
68389XAX3 Oracle Corp Note
2.250% Due 10/08/2019
1,250,000.00 Various
1.73%
1,272,172.50
1,262,664.46
101.24
1.62%
1,265,498.75
13,515.63
0.81%
2,834.29
A1 / AA-
A+
2.02
1.95
40428HPN6 HSBC USA Inc Note
2.375% Due 11/13/2019
1,000,000.00 11/07/2014
2.32%
1,002,440.00
1,001,032.92
100.71
2.03%
1,007,119.00
9,104.17
0.64%
6,086.08
A2 / A
AA-
2.12
2.04
46625HKA7 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont 12/23/2019
2.250% Due 01/23/2020
1,800,000.00 Various
2.37%
1,790,172.00
1,795,196.12
100.54
2.00%
1,809,691.20
7,650.00
1.15%
14,495.08
A3 / A-
A+
2.32
2.16
713448CS5 PepsiCo Inc Callable Note Cont 3/30/2020
1.850% Due 04/30/2020
1,330,000.00 04/27/2015
1.86%
1,329,241.90
1,329,609.12
100.08
1.82%
1,331,018.78
10,320.43
0.85%
1,409.66
A1 / A+
A
2.58
2.41
747525AD5 Qualcomm Inc Note
2.250% Due 05/20/2020
2,000,000.00 Various
2.22%
2,001,128.80
2,001,507.35
101.06
1.84%
2,021,180.00
16,375.01
1.28%
19,672.65
A1 / A
NR
2.64
2.53
24422ESY6 John Deere Capital Corp Note
2.375% Due 07/14/2020
1,000,000.00 09/15/2016
1.69%
1,025,153.50
1,018,364.04
100.88
2.05%
1,008,844.00
5,079.86
0.64%
(9,520.04)
A2 / A
A
2.79
2.68
00440EAT4 ACE INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 10/3/2020
2.300% Due 11/03/2020
2,000,000.00 Various
2.25%
2,003,489.00
2,002,946.03
100.73
2.05%
2,014,654.00
18,911.11
1.28%
11,707.97
A3 / A
A
3.10
2.87
24422ETF6 John Deere Capital Corp Note
2.550% Due 01/08/2021
750,000.00 Various
2.42%
753,733.15
753,017.26
101.27
2.14%
759,552.00
4,409.38
0.48%
6,534.74
A2 / A
A
3.28
3.11
30231GAV4 Exxon Mobil Corp Callable Note Cont 2/1/2021
2.222% Due 03/01/2021
1,800,000.00 Various
2.06%
1,813,024.00
1,809,333.87
100.76
1.99%
1,813,597.20
3,333.00
1.15%
4,263.33
Aaa / AA+
NR
3.42
3.27
166764BG4 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 4/15/2021
2.100% Due 05/16/2021
1,000,000.00 04/20/2017
2.09%
1,000,190.00
1,000,169.62
100.05
2.09%
1,000,491.00
7,875.00
0.64%
321.38
Aa2 / AA-
NR
3.63
3.37
857477AV5 State Street Bank Note
1.950% Due 05/19/2021
1,800,000.00 Various
1.91%
1,802,989.00
1,802,419.17
99.33
2.14%
1,787,925.60
12,870.00
1.14%
(14,493.57)
A1 / A
AA-
3.64
3.47
594918BP8 Microsoft Callable Note Cont 7/8/21
1.550% Due 08/08/2021
1,850,000.00 Various
1.59%
1,846,471.85
1,847,244.90
98.23
2.03%
1,817,332.70
4,221.60
1.15%
(29,912.20)
Aaa / AAA
AA+
3.86
3.71
91159HHP8 US Bancorp Note
2.625% Due 01/24/2022
2,000,000.00 05/23/2017
2.36%
2,023,280.00
2,021,531.27
101.39
2.28%
2,027,878.00
9,770.83
1.28%
6,346.73
A1 / A+
AA
4.32
4.05
Total US Corporate 35,135,000.00 1.94%
35,258,345.85
35,216,517.55
1.82%
35,274,497.99
186,065.06
22.35%
57,980.44
A1 / A+
A+
2.23
2.12
US Treasury
912828C24 US Treasury Note
1.500% Due 02/28/2019
1,750,000.00 08/18/2014
1.50%
1,750,347.65
1,750,108.25
100.09
1.43%
1,751,641.50
2,247.93
1.11%
1,533.25
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.41
1.40
912828D80 US Treasury Note
1.625% Due 08/31/2019
3,000,000.00 Various
1.78%
2,977,822.56
2,991,439.68
100.28
1.48%
3,008,436.00
4,174.72
1.90%
16,996.32
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.92
1.88
912828G61 US Treasury Note
1.500% Due 11/30/2019
4,500,000.00 Various
1.45%
4,507,600.72
4,504,291.83
99.98
1.51%
4,499,298.00
22,684.43
2.85%
(4,993.83)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.17
2.11
912828G95 US Treasury Note
1.625% Due 12/31/2019
3,000,000.00 01/08/2015
1.50%
3,017,470.99
3,007,911.57
100.22
1.52%
3,006,681.00
12,319.97
1.90%
(1,230.57)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.25
2.19
912828H52 US Treasury Note
1.250% Due 01/31/2020
4,500,000.00 Various
1.53%
4,440,542.42
4,471,788.99
99.34
1.54%
4,470,471.00
9,476.91
2.82%
(1,317.99)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.34
2.29
City of Dublin - Account #10198
32
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 296
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Holdings Report
For the Month Ending 9/30/2017
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units
Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
912828K58 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 04/30/2020
1,750,000.00 05/06/2015
1.55%
1,735,171.88
1,742,325.23
99.50
1.57%
1,741,250.00
10,069.63
1.10%
(1,075.23)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.58
2.51
912828XE5 US Treasury Note
1.500% Due 05/31/2020
3,000,000.00 Various
1.67%
2,976,025.68
2,986,999.25
99.78
1.58%
2,993,436.00
15,122.95
1.90%
6,436.75
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.67
2.59
912828XM7 US Treasury Note
1.625% Due 07/31/2020
1,500,000.00 09/08/2015
1.52%
1,507,622.21
1,504,410.39
100.05
1.60%
1,500,820.50
4,106.66
0.95%
(3,589.89)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.84
2.75
912828L99 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 10/31/2020
5,000,000.00 Various
1.69%
4,927,376.14
4,954,315.39
99.17
1.65%
4,958,595.00
28,770.38
3.14%
4,279.61
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.09
2.99
912828N89 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 01/31/2021
2,000,000.00 03/15/2016
1.49%
1,988,834.83
1,992,368.59
98.94
1.70%
1,978,828.00
4,633.15
1.25%
(13,540.59)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.34
3.24
912828S76 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 07/31/2021
1,500,000.00 12/12/2016
1.89%
1,449,262.83
1,458,024.07
97.57
1.78%
1,463,496.00
2,843.07
0.92%
5,471.93
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.84
3.72
912828T34 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 09/30/2021
2,750,000.00 Various
1.66%
2,682,431.10
2,694,159.39
97.37
1.81%
2,677,705.25
85.00
1.69%
(16,454.14)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.00
3.89
912828U65 US Treasury Note
1.750% Due 11/30/2021
2,500,000.00 12/28/2016
2.06%
2,464,461.50
2,469,919.83
99.66
1.83%
2,491,505.00
14,702.87
1.58%
21,585.17
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.17
3.98
912828V72 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 01/31/2022
1,500,000.00 02/27/2017
1.84%
1,502,407.37
1,502,119.50
100.05
1.86%
1,500,762.00
4,738.45
0.95%
(1,357.50)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.34
4.13
912828J76 US Treasury Note
1.750% Due 03/31/2022
3,000,000.00 04/25/2017
1.85%
2,985,830.37
2,987,074.15
99.43
1.88%
2,983,008.00
144.23
1.88%
(4,066.15)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.50
4.31
912828WZ9 US Treasury Note
1.750% Due 04/30/2022
2,750,000.00 05/23/2017
1.84%
2,738,944.75
2,739,742.30
99.38
1.89%
2,732,919.75
20,249.32
1.74%
(6,822.55)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.58
4.35
912828XR6 US Treasury Note
1.750% Due 05/31/2022
1,500,000.00 06/28/2017
1.81%
1,496,020.65
1,496,228.81
99.35
1.90%
1,490,215.50
8,821.72
0.94%
(6,013.31)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.67
4.43
912828XW5 US Treasury Note
1.750% Due 06/30/2022
3,000,000.00 07/25/2017
1.86%
2,984,072.55
2,984,665.41
99.27
1.91%
2,978,085.00
13,267.66
1.89%
(6,580.41)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.75
4.52
912828L24 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 08/31/2022
2,000,000.00 09/27/2017
1.92%
1,995,944.20
1,995,950.97
99.74
1.93%
1,994,844.00
3,211.33
1.26%
(1,106.97)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.92
4.67
Total US Treasury 50,500,000.00 1.69%
50,128,190.40
50,233,843.60
1.68%
50,221,997.50
181,670.38
31.77%
(11,846.10)
Aaa / AA+
Aaa
3.27
3.15
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 158,479,892.11 1.60%
158,240,551.55
158,285,368.98 1.66%
158,070,235.00
561,006.23
100.00%
(215,133.98)
Aa1 / AA
Aaa
2.57
2.41
TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 158,631,241.23
City of Dublin - Account #10198
33
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 297
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Holdings Report
For the Month Ending 9/30/2017
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units
Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
LAIF
90LAIF$00 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool
40,171,017.88 Various
1.12%
40,171,017.88
40,171,017.88
1.00
1.12%
40,171,017.88
109,825.92
66.92%
0.00
NR / NR
NR
0.00
0.00
Total LAIF 40,171,017.88 1.12%
40,171,017.88
40,171,017.88
1.12%
40,171,017.88
109,825.92
66.92%
0.00
NR / NR
NR
0.00
0.00
Local Gov Investment Pool
90CAMP$00 Public Financial Management CAMP
19,916,176.73 Various
1.14%
19,916,176.73
19,916,176.73
1.00
1.14%
19,916,176.73
0.00
33.08%
0.00
NR / AAA
NR
0.00
0.00
Total Local Gov Investment Pool 19,916,176.73 1.14%
19,916,176.73
19,916,176.73
1.14%
19,916,176.73
0.00
33.08%
0.00
NR / AAA
NR
0.00
0.00
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 60,087,194.61 1.13%
60,087,194.61
60,087,194.61 1.13%
60,087,194.61
109,825.92
100.00%
0.00
NR / AAA
NR
0.00
0.00
TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 60,197,020.53
City of Dublin Reporting Account - Account #10219
34
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 298
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
SECTION 5
Transactions
35
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 299
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Transaction Ledger
City of Dublin - Account #10198
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/07/2017 06538BY80 3,160,000.00 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi NY Discount CP
1.33% Due: 11/08/2017 99.542 1.35% 3,145,523.69 0.00 3,145,523.69 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2017 47788BAB0 455,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A2A
1.59% Due: 04/15/2020 99.991 1.60% 454,960.46 0.00 454,960.46 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2017 47788BAD6 320,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due: 10/15/2021 99.993 1.83% 319,976.58 0.00 319,976.58 0.00
Purchase 07/26/2017 912828XW5 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.75% Due: 06/30/2022 99.469 1.86% 2,984,072.55 3,709.24 2,987,781.79 0.00
Purchase 08/09/2017 06417GXH6 2,775,000.00 Bank of Nova Scotia Yankee CD
1.57% Due: 08/09/2018 100.000 1.57% 2,775,000.00 0.00 2,775,000.00 0.00
Purchase 08/31/2017 313379RB7 3,000,000.00 FHLB Note
1.875% Due: 06/11/2021 100.754 1.67% 3,022,620.00 12,500.00 3,035,120.00 0.00
Purchase 09/28/2017 912828L24 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due: 08/31/2022 99.797 1.92% 1,995,944.20 2,900.55 1,998,844.75 0.00
Purchase 09/29/2017 43814PAB6 460,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner T 17-3 A2
1.57% Due: 01/21/2020 99.991 1.58% 459,959.11 0.00 459,959.11 0.00
Subtotal 15,170,000.00 15,158,056.59 19,109.79 15,177,166.38 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 15,170,000.00 15,158,056.59 19,109.79 15,177,166.38 0.00
DISPOSITIONS
Sale 07/13/2017 3134G3Y53 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable Note 1X 11/28/14
0.85% Due: 11/28/2017 99.889 1.15% 1,997,780.00 2,125.00 1,999,905.00 -2220.00
Sale 07/26/2017 912828G61 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.5% Due: 11/30/2019 100.164 1.43% 2,003,274.54 4,590.16 2,007,864.70 1205.29
Sale 08/09/2017 313381B20 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note
0.75% Due: 12/08/2017 99.865 1.16% 1,997,300.00 2,541.67 1,999,841.67 -2698.67
Sale 08/31/2017 912828RH5 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due: 09/30/2018 100.136 1.25% 2,002,727.68 11,495.90 2,014,223.58 1495.77
Subtotal 8,000,000.00 8,001,082.22 20,752.73 8,021,834.95 -2,217.61
June 30, 2017 through September 30, 2017
36
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 300
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Transaction Ledger
City of Dublin - Account #10198
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
Maturity 07/07/2017 06538BU76 2,935,000.00 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi NY Discount CP
1.18% Due: 07/07/2017 99.600 2,935,000.00 0.00 2,935,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 2,935,000.00 2,935,000.00 0.00 2,935,000.00 0.00
TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 14,462,266.93 14,463,349.15 52,560.55 14,515,909.70 -2,217.61
June 30, 2017 through September 30, 2017
37
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 301
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Transaction Ledger
City of Dublin Reporting Account - Account #10219
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/15/2017 90LAIF$00 96,835.43 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 1.000 1.01% 96,835.43 0.00 96,835.43 0.00
Purchase 07/31/2017 90CAMP$00 32,077.30 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1.13% 32,077.30 0.00 32,077.30 0.00
Purchase 08/31/2017 90CAMP$00 25,333.69 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1.13% 25,333.69 0.00 25,333.69 0.00
Purchase 09/30/2017 90CAMP$00 20,735.95 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1.14% 20,735.95 0.00 20,735.95 0.00
Subtotal 174,982.37 174,982.37 0.00 174,982.37 0.00
Security
Contribution 07/25/2017 90CAMP$00 4,000,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 4,000,000.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 0.00
Security
Contribution 08/21/2017 90CAMP$00 2,700,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,700,000.00 0.00 2,700,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 6,700,000.00 6,700,000.00 0.00 6,700,000.00 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 6,874,982.37 6,874,982.37 0.00 6,874,982.37 0.00
DISPOSITIONS
Security
Withdrawal 07/31/2017 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 08/04/2017 90CAMP$00 9,000,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 9,000,000.00 0.00 9,000,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 08/16/2017 90CAMP$00 2,000,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 09/06/2017 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 09/13/2017 90CAMP$00 1,300,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1,300,000.00 0.00 1,300,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 09/15/2017 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 19,800,000.00 19,800,000.00 0.00 19,800,000.00 0.00
TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 19,800,000.00 19,800,000.00 0.00 19,800,000.00 0.00
June 30, 2017 through September 30, 2017
38
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 302
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Transaction Ledger
City of Dublin Consolidated - Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/07/2017 06538BY80 3,160,000.00 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi NY Discount CP
1.33% Due: 11/08/2017 99.542 1.35% 3,145,523.69 0.00 3,145,523.69 0.00
Purchase 07/15/2017 90LAIF$00 96,835.43 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 1.000 1.01% 96,835.43 0.00 96,835.43 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2017 47788BAB0 455,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A2A
1.59% Due: 04/15/2020 99.991 1.60% 454,960.46 0.00 454,960.46 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2017 47788BAD6 320,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due: 10/15/2021 99.993 1.83% 319,976.58 0.00 319,976.58 0.00
Purchase 07/26/2017 912828XW5 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.75% Due: 06/30/2022 99.469 1.86% 2,984,072.55 3,709.24 2,987,781.79 0.00
Purchase 07/31/2017 90CAMP$00 32,077.30 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1.13% 32,077.30 0.00 32,077.30 0.00
Purchase 08/09/2017 06417GXH6 2,775,000.00 Bank of Nova Scotia Yankee CD
1.57% Due: 08/09/2018 100.000 1.57% 2,775,000.00 0.00 2,775,000.00 0.00
Purchase 08/31/2017 313379RB7 3,000,000.00 FHLB Note
1.875% Due: 06/11/2021 100.754 1.67% 3,022,620.00 12,500.00 3,035,120.00 0.00
Purchase 08/31/2017 90CAMP$00 25,333.69 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1.13% 25,333.69 0.00 25,333.69 0.00
Purchase 09/28/2017 912828L24 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due: 08/31/2022 99.797 1.92% 1,995,944.20 2,900.55 1,998,844.75 0.00
Purchase 09/29/2017 43814PAB6 460,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner T 17-3 A2
1.57% Due: 01/21/2020 99.991 1.58% 459,959.11 0.00 459,959.11 0.00
Purchase 09/30/2017 90CAMP$00 20,735.95 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1.14% 20,735.95 0.00 20,735.95 0.00
Subtotal 15,344,982.37 15,333,038.96 19,109.79 15,352,148.75 0.00
Security
Contribution 07/25/2017 90CAMP$00 4,000,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 4,000,000.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 0.00
Security
Contribution 08/21/2017 90CAMP$00 2,700,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,700,000.00 0.00 2,700,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 6,700,000.00 6,700,000.00 0.00 6,700,000.00 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 22,044,982.37 22,033,038.96 19,109.79 22,052,148.75 0.00
June 30, 2017 through September 30, 2017
39
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 303
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Transaction Ledger
City of Dublin Consolidated - Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
DISPOSITIONS
Sale 07/13/2017 3134G3Y53 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable Note 1X 11/28/14
0.85% Due: 11/28/2017 99.889 1.15% 1,997,780.00 2,125.00 1,999,905.00 -2220.00
Sale 07/26/2017 912828G61 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.5% Due: 11/30/2019 100.164 1.43% 2,003,274.54 4,590.16 2,007,864.70 1205.29
Sale 08/09/2017 313381B20 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note
0.75% Due: 12/08/2017 99.865 1.16% 1,997,300.00 2,541.67 1,999,841.67 -2698.67
Sale 08/31/2017 912828RH5 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due: 09/30/2018 100.136 1.25% 2,002,727.68 11,495.90 2,014,223.58 1495.77
Subtotal 8,000,000.00 8,001,082.22 20,752.73 8,021,834.95 -2,217.61
Maturity 07/07/2017 06538BU76 2,935,000.00 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi NY Discount CP
1.18% Due: 07/07/2017 99.600 2,935,000.00 0.00 2,935,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 2,935,000.00 2,935,000.00 0.00 2,935,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 07/31/2017 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 08/04/2017 90CAMP$00 9,000,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 9,000,000.00 0.00 9,000,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 08/16/2017 90CAMP$00 2,000,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 09/06/2017 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 09/13/2017 90CAMP$00 1,300,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1,300,000.00 0.00 1,300,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal 09/15/2017 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 19,800,000.00 19,800,000.00 0.00 19,800,000.00 0.00
TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 34,262,266.93 34,263,349.15 52,560.55 34,315,909.70 -2,217.61
June 30, 2017 through September 30, 2017
40
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 304
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Disclosure
Information contained herein is confidential. Prices are provided by IDC, an independent
pricing source. In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not
reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third
party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our
valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.
41
Attachment 1 4.4.a
Packet Pg. 305
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
D
u
b
l
i
n
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
Transaction Ledger
6/30/17 Thru 7/31/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/03/2017 31846V203 1,079.36 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %1,079.36 0.00 1,079.36 0.00
Purchase 07/05/2017 31846V203 24,444.45 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %24,444.45 0.00 24,444.45 0.00
Purchase 07/07/2017 06538BY80 3,160,000.00 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi NY Discount CP
1.33% Due 11/8/2017
99.542 1.35 %3,145,523.69 0.00 3,145,523.69 0.00
Purchase 07/07/2017 31846V203 2,935,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %2,935,000.00 0.00 2,935,000.00 0.00
Purchase 07/08/2017 31846V203 9,562.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %9,562.50 0.00 9,562.50 0.00
Purchase 07/13/2017 31846V203 1,999,905.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %1,999,905.00 0.00 1,999,905.00 0.00
Purchase 07/14/2017 31846V203 25,937.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %25,937.50 0.00 25,937.50 0.00
Purchase 07/15/2017 90LAIF$00 96,835.43 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 1.000 1.01 %96,835.43 0.00 96,835.43 0.00
Purchase 07/16/2017 31846V203 4,062.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %4,062.50 0.00 4,062.50 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 1,660.67 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %1,660.67 0.00 1,660.67 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 932.46 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %932.46 0.00 932.46 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 15,860.04 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %15,860.04 0.00 15,860.04 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 818.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %818.75 0.00 818.75 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 1,263.67 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %1,263.67 0.00 1,263.67 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 102,126.58 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %102,126.58 0.00 102,126.58 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 771.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %771.75 0.00 771.75 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 77,612.37 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %77,612.37 0.00 77,612.37 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 106,931.96 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %106,931.96 0.00 106,931.96 0.00
Purchase 07/17/2017 31846V203 55,902.42 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %55,902.42 0.00 55,902.42 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2017 31846V203 13,528.54 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %13,528.54 0.00 13,528.54 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2017 31846V203 101,353.57 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %101,353.57 0.00 101,353.57 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2017 47788BAB0 455,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A2A
1.59% Due 4/15/2020
99.991 1.60 %454,960.46 0.00 454,960.46 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2017 47788BAD6 320,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
99.993 1.83 %319,976.58 0.00 319,976.58 0.00
Purchase 07/21/2017 31846V203 16,250.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %16,250.00 0.00 16,250.00 0.00
Purchase 07/21/2017 31846V203 93,417.13 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %93,417.13 0.00 93,417.13 0.00
Purchase 07/21/2017 31846V203 1,029.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %1,029.50 0.00 1,029.50 0.00
Purchase 07/23/2017 31846V203 20,250.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %20,250.00 0.00 20,250.00 0.00
Purchase 07/24/2017 31846V203 26,250.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %26,250.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00
Execution Time: 8/23/2017 10:06:34 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 8
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 306
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
6/30/17 Thru 7/31/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/26/2017 912828XW5 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.75% Due 6/30/2022
99.469 1.86 %2,984,072.55 3,709.24 2,987,781.79 0.00
Purchase 07/31/2017 31846V203 76,562.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %76,562.50 0.00 76,562.50 0.00
Purchase 07/31/2017 90CAMP$00 32,077.30 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1.13 %32,077.30 0.00 32,077.30 0.00
Subtotal 12,776,425.95 12,745,959.23 3,709.24 12,749,668.47 0.00
Security
Contribution
07/25/2017 90CAMP$00 4,000,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 4,000,000.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 0.00
Short Sale 07/18/2017 31846V203 -774,937.04 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 -774,937.04 0.00 -774,937.04 0.00
Subtotal -774,937.04 -774,937.04 0.00 -774,937.04 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 16,001,488.91 15,971,022.19 3,709.24 15,974,731.43 0.00
DISPOSITIONS
Closing
Purchase
07/18/2017 31846V203 -774,937.04 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 -774,937.04 0.00 -774,937.04 0.00
Subtotal -774,937.04 -774,937.04 0.00 -774,937.04 0.00
Sale 07/07/2017 31846V203 3,145,523.69 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %3,145,523.69 0.00 3,145,523.69 0.00
Sale 07/13/2017 3134G3Y53 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable Note 1X 11/28/14
0.85% Due 11/28/2017
99.889 1.15 %1,997,780.00 2,125.00 1,999,905.00 -2,220.00
Sale 07/18/2017 31846V203 774,937.04 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %774,937.04 0.00 774,937.04 0.00
Sale 07/26/2017 31846V203 979,917.09 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.57 %979,917.09 0.00 979,917.09 0.00
Sale 07/26/2017 912828G61 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.5% Due 11/30/2019
100.164 1.43 %2,003,274.54 4,590.16 2,007,864.70 1,205.29
Subtotal 8,900,377.82 8,901,432.36 6,715.16 8,908,147.52 -1,014.71
Paydown 07/17/2017 161571HH0 0.00 Chase CHAIT Pool #2016-A7
1.06% Due 9/16/2019
100.000 0.00 1,660.67 1,660.67 0.00
Paydown 07/17/2017 43814QAC2 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-2 A3
1.39% Due 4/15/2020
100.000 0.00 932.46 932.46 0.00
Paydown 07/17/2017 47787VAC5 15,847.89 John Deere Owner Trust 2014-A A3
0.92% Due 4/16/2018
100.000 15,847.89 12.15 15,860.04 0.00
Paydown 07/17/2017 47787XAB3 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-A A2
1.5% Due 10/15/2019
100.000 0.00 818.75 818.75 0.00
Execution Time: 8/23/2017 10:06:34 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 9
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 307
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
6/30/17 Thru 7/31/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
DISPOSITIONS
Paydown 07/17/2017 47788MAC4 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-A A3
1.36% Due 4/15/2020
100.000 0.00 1,263.67 1,263.67 0.00
Paydown 07/17/2017 47788NAB4 101,177.72 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-B A2
1.09% Due 2/15/2019
100.000 101,177.72 948.86 102,126.58 0.00
Paydown 07/17/2017 654747AB0 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-A A2A
1.47% Due 1/15/2020
100.000 0.00 771.75 771.75 0.00
Paydown 07/17/2017 65478WAB1 76,950.57 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C
A2A
1.07% Due 5/15/2019
100.000 76,950.57 661.80 77,612.37 0.00
Paydown 07/17/2017 89231LAB3 105,936.23 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2016-D
1.06% Due 5/15/2019
100.000 105,936.23 995.73 106,931.96 0.00
Paydown 07/17/2017 89236WAC2 55,486.32 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2015-A
1.12% Due 2/15/2019
100.000 55,486.32 416.10 55,902.42 0.00
Paydown 07/18/2017 43814GAC4 13,519.87 Honda Auto Receivables 2014-2 A3
0.77% Due 3/19/2018
100.000 13,519.87 8.67 13,528.54 0.00
Paydown 07/18/2017 43814NAB1 101,128.82 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-1 A2
1.01% Due 6/18/2018
100.000 101,128.82 224.75 101,353.57 0.00
Paydown 07/21/2017 43813NAC0 92,764.12 Honda Auto Receivables 2015-2 A3
1.04% Due 2/21/2019
100.000 92,764.12 653.01 93,417.13 0.00
Paydown 07/21/2017 43814TAB8 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables 2017-1 A2
1.42% Due 7/22/2019
100.000 0.00 1,029.50 1,029.50 0.00
Subtotal 562,811.54 562,811.54 10,397.87 573,209.41 0.00
Maturity 07/07/2017 06538BU76 2,935,000.00 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi NY Discount CP
1.18% Due 7/7/2017
99.600 2,935,000.00 0.00 2,935,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 2,935,000.00 2,935,000.00 0.00 2,935,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
07/25/2017 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
07/31/2017 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 2,500,104.17 2,500,104.17 0.00 2,500,104.17 0.00
TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 14,123,356.49 14,124,411.03 17,113.03 14,141,524.06 -1,014.71
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Interest 07/05/2017 3135G0S38 2,500,000.00 FNMA Note
2% Due 1/5/2022
0.000 24,444.45 0.00 24,444.45 0.00
Execution Time: 8/23/2017 10:06:34 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 308
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
6/30/17 Thru 7/31/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Interest 07/08/2017 24422ETF6 750,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note
2.55% Due 1/8/2021
0.000 9,562.50 0.00 9,562.50 0.00
Interest 07/14/2017 24422ESY6 1,000,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note
2.375% Due 7/14/2020
0.000 11,875.00 0.00 11,875.00 0.00
Interest 07/14/2017 3130A8QS5 2,500,000.00 FHLB Note
1.125% Due 7/14/2021
0.000 14,062.50 0.00 14,062.50 0.00
Interest 07/16/2017 40428HPH9 500,000.00 HSBC USA Inc Note
1.625% Due 1/16/2018
0.000 4,062.50 0.00 4,062.50 0.00
Interest 07/21/2017 3135G0A78 2,000,000.00 FNMA Note
1.625% Due 1/21/2020
0.000 16,250.00 0.00 16,250.00 0.00
Interest 07/23/2017 46625HKA7 1,800,000.00 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont
12/23/2019
2.25% Due 1/23/2020
0.000 20,250.00 0.00 20,250.00 0.00
Interest 07/24/2017 91159HHP8 2,000,000.00 US Bancorp Note
2.625% Due 1/24/2022
0.000 26,250.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00
Interest 07/31/2017 912828H52 4,500,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.25% Due 1/31/2020
0.000 28,125.00 0.00 28,125.00 0.00
Interest 07/31/2017 912828N89 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 1/31/2021
0.000 13,750.00 0.00 13,750.00 0.00
Interest 07/31/2017 912828S76 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 7/31/2021
0.000 8,437.50 0.00 8,437.50 0.00
Interest 07/31/2017 912828V72 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 1/31/2022
0.000 14,062.50 0.00 14,062.50 0.00
Interest 07/31/2017 912828XM7 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.625% Due 7/31/2020
0.000 12,187.50 0.00 12,187.50 0.00
Subtotal 24,050,000.00 203,319.45 0.00 203,319.45 0.00
Dividend 07/03/2017 31846V203 436,922.92 First American Govt Obligation Fund 0.000 1,079.36 0.00 1,079.36 0.00
Dividend 07/15/2017 90LAIF$00 3,825,316,362.2
0
Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 0.000 96,835.43 0.00 96,835.43 0.00
Dividend 07/31/2017 90CAMP$00 32,938,029.79 Public Financial Management CAMP 0.000 32,077.30 0.00 32,077.30 0.00
Subtotal 3,858,691,314.9
1
129,992.09 0.00 129,992.09 0.00
TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 3,882,741,314.9
1
333,311.54 0.00 333,311.54 0.00
Execution Time: 8/23/2017 10:06:34 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 309
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
7/31/17 Thru 8/31/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 08/01/2017 31846V203 10,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %10,500.00 0.00 10,500.00 0.00
Purchase 08/01/2017 31846V203 641.84 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %641.84 0.00 641.84 0.00
Purchase 08/08/2017 31846V203 27,462.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %27,462.50 0.00 27,462.50 0.00
Purchase 08/09/2017 06417GXH6 2,775,000.00 Bank of Nova Scotia Yankee CD
1.57% Due 8/9/2018
100.000 1.57 %2,775,000.00 0.00 2,775,000.00 0.00
Purchase 08/12/2017 31846V203 16,875.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %16,875.00 0.00 16,875.00 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 30,250.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %30,250.00 0.00 30,250.00 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 1,660.67 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %1,660.67 0.00 1,660.67 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 932.46 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %932.46 0.00 932.46 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 818.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %818.75 0.00 818.75 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 1,263.67 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %1,263.67 0.00 1,263.67 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 129,838.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %129,838.50 0.00 129,838.50 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 771.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %771.75 0.00 771.75 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 72,813.93 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %72,813.93 0.00 72,813.93 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 98,266.69 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %98,266.69 0.00 98,266.69 0.00
Purchase 08/15/2017 31846V203 51,448.69 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %51,448.69 0.00 51,448.69 0.00
Purchase 08/18/2017 31846V203 23,856.25 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %23,856.25 0.00 23,856.25 0.00
Purchase 08/18/2017 31846V203 95,262.64 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %95,262.64 0.00 95,262.64 0.00
Purchase 08/21/2017 31846V203 85,583.53 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %85,583.53 0.00 85,583.53 0.00
Purchase 08/21/2017 31846V203 1,029.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %1,029.50 0.00 1,029.50 0.00
Purchase 08/26/2017 31846V203 34,375.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %34,375.00 0.00 34,375.00 0.00
Purchase 08/31/2017 313379RB7 3,000,000.00 FHLB Note
1.875% Due 6/11/2021
100.754 1.67 %3,022,620.00 12,500.00 3,035,120.00 0.00
Purchase 08/31/2017 31846V203 37,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %37,500.00 0.00 37,500.00 0.00
Purchase 08/31/2017 90CAMP$00 25,333.69 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1.13 %25,333.69 0.00 25,333.69 0.00
Subtotal 6,521,485.06 6,544,105.06 12,500.00 6,556,605.06 0.00
Security
Contribution
08/21/2017 90CAMP$00 2,700,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,700,000.00 0.00 2,700,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 2,700,000.00 2,700,000.00 0.00 2,700,000.00 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 9,221,485.06 9,244,105.06 12,500.00 9,256,605.06 0.00
Execution Time: 9/28/2017 10:58:56 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 8
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 310
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
7/31/17 Thru 8/31/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
DISPOSITIONS
Sale 08/09/2017 313381B20 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note
0.75% Due 12/8/2017
99.865 1.16 %1,997,300.00 2,541.67 1,999,841.67 -2,698.67
Sale 08/09/2017 31846V203 775,158.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.60 %775,158.33 0.00 775,158.33 0.00
Sale 08/31/2017 31846V203 1,020,896.42 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %1,020,896.42 0.00 1,020,896.42 0.00
Sale 08/31/2017 912828RH5 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 9/30/2018
100.136 1.25 %2,002,727.68 11,495.90 2,014,223.58 1,495.77
Subtotal 5,796,054.75 5,796,082.43 14,037.57 5,810,120.00 -1,202.90
Paydown 08/15/2017 161571HH0 0.00 Chase CHAIT Pool #2016-A7
1.06% Due 9/16/2019
100.000 0.00 1,660.67 1,660.67 0.00
Paydown 08/15/2017 43814QAC2 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-2 A3
1.39% Due 4/15/2020
100.000 0.00 932.46 932.46 0.00
Paydown 08/15/2017 47787XAB3 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-A A2
1.5% Due 10/15/2019
100.000 0.00 818.75 818.75 0.00
Paydown 08/15/2017 47788MAC4 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-A A3
1.36% Due 4/15/2020
100.000 0.00 1,263.67 1,263.67 0.00
Paydown 08/15/2017 47788NAB4 128,981.54 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-B A2
1.09% Due 2/15/2019
100.000 128,981.54 856.96 129,838.50 0.00
Paydown 08/15/2017 654747AB0 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-A A2A
1.47% Due 1/15/2020
100.000 0.00 771.75 771.75 0.00
Paydown 08/15/2017 65478WAB1 72,220.75 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C
A2A
1.07% Due 5/15/2019
100.000 72,220.75 593.18 72,813.93 0.00
Paydown 08/15/2017 89231LAB3 97,364.54 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2016-D
1.06% Due 5/15/2019
100.000 97,364.54 902.15 98,266.69 0.00
Paydown 08/15/2017 89236WAC2 51,084.37 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2015-A
1.12% Due 2/15/2019
100.000 51,084.37 364.32 51,448.69 0.00
Paydown 08/18/2017 43814NAB1 95,123.00 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-1 A2
1.01% Due 6/18/2018
100.000 95,123.00 139.64 95,262.64 0.00
Paydown 08/21/2017 43813NAC0 85,010.91 Honda Auto Receivables 2015-2 A3
1.04% Due 2/21/2019
100.000 85,010.91 572.62 85,583.53 0.00
Paydown 08/21/2017 43814TAB8 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables 2017-1 A2
1.42% Due 7/22/2019
100.000 0.00 1,029.50 1,029.50 0.00
Subtotal 529,785.11 529,785.11 9,905.67 539,690.78 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
08/04/2017 90CAMP$00 9,000,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 9,000,000.00 0.00 9,000,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
08/16/2017 90CAMP$00 2,000,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Execution Time: 9/28/2017 10:58:56 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 9
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 311
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
7/31/17 Thru 8/31/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
DISPOSITIONS
Security
Withdrawal
08/25/2017 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00
Subtotal 11,000,104.17 11,000,104.17 0.00 11,000,104.17 0.00
TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 17,325,944.03 17,325,971.71 23,943.24 17,349,914.95 -1,202.90
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Interest 08/01/2017 06406HCL1 1,000,000.00 Bank of New York Callable Note Cont
7/2/2018
2.1% Due 8/1/2018
0.000 10,500.00 0.00 10,500.00 0.00
Interest 08/08/2017 3135G0TG8 3,000,000.00 FNMA Note
0.875% Due 2/8/2018
0.000 13,125.00 0.00 13,125.00 0.00
Interest 08/08/2017 594918BP8 1,850,000.00 Microsoft Callable Note Cont 7/8/21
1.55% Due 8/8/2021
0.000 14,337.50 0.00 14,337.50 0.00
Interest 08/12/2017 3137EAEC9 3,000,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.125% Due 8/12/2021
0.000 16,875.00 0.00 16,875.00 0.00
Interest 08/15/2017 02665WAH4 1,800,000.00 American Honda Finance Note
2.25% Due 8/15/2019
0.000 20,250.00 0.00 20,250.00 0.00
Interest 08/15/2017 084664BY6 1,000,000.00 Berkshire Hathaway Note
2% Due 8/15/2018
0.000 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00
Interest 08/18/2017 3130A7CV5 3,470,000.00 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 2/18/2021
0.000 23,856.25 0.00 23,856.25 0.00
Interest 08/26/2017 3135G0J20 5,000,000.00 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 2/26/2021
0.000 34,375.00 0.00 34,375.00 0.00
Interest 08/31/2017 912828C24 1,750,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.5% Due 2/28/2019
0.000 13,125.00 0.00 13,125.00 0.00
Interest 08/31/2017 912828D80 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.625% Due 8/31/2019
0.000 24,375.00 0.00 24,375.00 0.00
Subtotal 24,870,000.00 180,818.75 0.00 180,818.75 0.00
Dividend 08/01/2017 31846V203 1,259,454.15 First American Govt Obligation Fund 0.000 641.84 0.00 641.84 0.00
Execution Time: 9/28/2017 10:58:56 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 312
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
7/31/17 Thru 8/31/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Dividend 08/31/2017 90CAMP$00 26,170,107.09 Public Financial Management CAMP 0.000 25,333.69 0.00 25,333.69 0.00
Subtotal 27,429,561.24 25,975.53 0.00 25,975.53 0.00
TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 52,299,561.24 206,794.28 0.00 206,794.28 0.00
Execution Time: 9/28/2017 10:58:56 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 313
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
8/31/17 Thru 9/30/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 09/01/2017 31846V203 34,341.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %34,341.75 0.00 34,341.75 0.00
Purchase 09/01/2017 31846V203 507.34 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %507.34 0.00 507.34 0.00
Purchase 09/07/2017 31846V203 13,125.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %13,125.00 0.00 13,125.00 0.00
Purchase 09/08/2017 31846V203 20,625.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %20,625.00 0.00 20,625.00 0.00
Purchase 09/09/2017 31846V203 27,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %27,500.00 0.00 27,500.00 0.00
Purchase 09/11/2017 31846V203 31,125.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %31,125.00 0.00 31,125.00 0.00
Purchase 09/12/2017 31846V203 21,875.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %21,875.00 0.00 21,875.00 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 15,356.25 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %15,356.25 0.00 15,356.25 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 1,881,660.67 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %1,881,660.67 0.00 1,881,660.67 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 932.46 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %932.46 0.00 932.46 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 818.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %818.75 0.00 818.75 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 1,145.46 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %1,145.46 0.00 1,145.46 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 922.13 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %922.13 0.00 922.13 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 1,263.67 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %1,263.67 0.00 1,263.67 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 110,721.28 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %110,721.28 0.00 110,721.28 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 771.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %771.75 0.00 771.75 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 73,051.06 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %73,051.06 0.00 73,051.06 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 103,440.48 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %103,440.48 0.00 103,440.48 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2017 31846V203 51,647.55 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %51,647.55 0.00 51,647.55 0.00
Purchase 09/18/2017 31846V203 70,840.86 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %70,840.86 0.00 70,840.86 0.00
Purchase 09/21/2017 31846V203 84,943.85 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %84,943.85 0.00 84,943.85 0.00
Purchase 09/21/2017 31846V203 64,014.59 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %64,014.59 0.00 64,014.59 0.00
Purchase 09/28/2017 912828L24 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2022
99.797 1.92 %1,995,944.20 2,900.55 1,998,844.75 0.00
Purchase 09/29/2017 43814PAB6 460,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner T 17-3 A2
1.57% Due 1/21/2020
99.991 1.58 %459,959.11 0.00 459,959.11 0.00
Purchase 09/30/2017 31846V203 41,718.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %41,718.75 0.00 41,718.75 0.00
Purchase 09/30/2017 90CAMP$00 20,735.95 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1.14 %20,735.95 0.00 20,735.95 0.00
Subtotal 5,133,084.60 5,128,987.91 2,900.55 5,131,888.46 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 5,133,084.60 5,128,987.91 2,900.55 5,131,888.46 0.00
Execution Time: 10/30/2017 10:36:40 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 8
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 314
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
8/31/17 Thru 9/30/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
DISPOSITIONS
Sale 09/28/2017 31846V203 1,998,844.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %1,998,844.75 0.00 1,998,844.75 0.00
Sale 09/29/2017 31846V203 459,959.11 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.61 %459,959.11 0.00 459,959.11 0.00
Subtotal 2,458,803.86 2,458,803.86 0.00 2,458,803.86 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 161571HH0 1,880,000.00 Chase CHAIT Pool #2016-A7
1.06% Due 9/16/2019
100.000 1,880,000.00 1,660.67 1,881,660.67 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 43814QAC2 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-2 A3
1.39% Due 4/15/2020
100.000 0.00 932.46 932.46 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 47787XAB3 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-A A2
1.5% Due 10/15/2019
100.000 0.00 818.75 818.75 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 47788BAB0 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A2A
1.59% Due 4/15/2020
100.000 0.00 1,145.46 1,145.46 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 47788BAD6 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
100.000 0.00 922.13 922.13 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 47788MAC4 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-A A3
1.36% Due 4/15/2020
100.000 0.00 1,263.67 1,263.67 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 47788NAB4 109,981.48 John Deere Owner Trust 2016-B A2
1.09% Due 2/15/2019
100.000 109,981.48 739.80 110,721.28 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 654747AB0 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables 2017-A A2A
1.47% Due 1/15/2020
100.000 0.00 771.75 771.75 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 65478WAB1 72,522.27 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C
A2A
1.07% Due 5/15/2019
100.000 72,522.27 528.79 73,051.06 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 89231LAB3 102,624.33 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2016-D
1.06% Due 5/15/2019
100.000 102,624.33 816.15 103,440.48 0.00
Paydown 09/15/2017 89236WAC2 51,330.91 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2015-A
1.12% Due 2/15/2019
100.000 51,330.91 316.64 51,647.55 0.00
Paydown 09/18/2017 43814NAB1 70,781.29 Honda Auto Receivables 2016-1 A2
1.01% Due 6/18/2018
100.000 70,781.29 59.57 70,840.86 0.00
Paydown 09/21/2017 43813NAC0 84,444.91 Honda Auto Receivables 2015-2 A3
1.04% Due 2/21/2019
100.000 84,444.91 498.94 84,943.85 0.00
Paydown 09/21/2017 43814TAB8 62,985.09 Honda Auto Receivables 2017-1 A2
1.42% Due 7/22/2019
100.000 62,985.09 1,029.50 64,014.59 0.00
Subtotal 2,434,670.28 2,434,670.28 11,504.28 2,446,174.56 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
09/06/2017 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
09/13/2017 90CAMP$00 1,300,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 1,300,000.00 0.00 1,300,000.00 0.00
Execution Time: 10/30/2017 10:36:40 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 9
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 315
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
8/31/17 Thru 9/30/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
DISPOSITIONS
Security
Withdrawal
09/15/2017 90CAMP$00 2,500,000.00 Public Financial Management CAMP 1.000 2,500,000.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
09/25/2017 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00
Subtotal 6,300,104.17 6,300,104.17 0.00 6,300,104.17 0.00
TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 11,193,578.31 11,193,578.31 11,504.28 11,205,082.59 0.00
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Interest 09/01/2017 17275RAR3 1,350,000.00 Cisco Systems Note
2.125% Due 3/1/2019
0.000 14,343.75 0.00 14,343.75 0.00
Interest 09/01/2017 30231GAV4 1,800,000.00 Exxon Mobil Corp Callable Note Cont
2/1/2021
2.222% Due 3/1/2021
0.000 19,998.00 0.00 19,998.00 0.00
Interest 09/07/2017 3137EADP1 3,000,000.00 FHLMC Note
0.875% Due 3/7/2018
0.000 13,125.00 0.00 13,125.00 0.00
Interest 09/08/2017 3133782M2 2,750,000.00 FHLB Note
1.5% Due 3/8/2019
0.000 20,625.00 0.00 20,625.00 0.00
Interest 09/09/2017 313378A43 4,000,000.00 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 3/9/2018
0.000 27,500.00 0.00 27,500.00 0.00
Interest 09/11/2017 06406HCW7 750,000.00 Bank of New York Callable Note Cont
8/11/2019
2.3% Due 9/11/2019
0.000 8,625.00 0.00 8,625.00 0.00
Interest 09/11/2017 313378CR0 2,000,000.00 FHLB Note
2.25% Due 3/11/2022
0.000 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 0.00
Interest 09/12/2017 3135G0ZG1 2,500,000.00 FNMA Note
1.75% Due 9/12/2019
0.000 21,875.00 0.00 21,875.00 0.00
Interest 09/15/2017 532457BF4 1,575,000.00 Eli Lilly & Co Note
1.95% Due 3/15/2019
0.000 15,356.25 0.00 15,356.25 0.00
Interest 09/30/2017 912828J76 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.75% Due 3/31/2022
0.000 26,250.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00
Interest 09/30/2017 912828T34 2,750,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 9/30/2021
0.000 15,468.75 0.00 15,468.75 0.00
Subtotal 25,475,000.00 205,666.75 0.00 205,666.75 0.00
Dividend 09/01/2017 31846V203 208,288.35 First American Govt Obligation Fund 0.000 507.34 0.00 507.34 0.00
Execution Time: 10/30/2017 10:36:40 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 316
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Transaction Ledger
8/31/17 Thru 9/30/17
City of Dublin Consolidated
Account #10221
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price
Acq/Disp
Yield Amount
Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Dividend 09/30/2017 90CAMP$00 19,895,440.78 Public Financial Management CAMP 0.000 20,735.95 0.00 20,735.95 0.00
Subtotal 20,103,729.13 21,243.29 0.00 21,243.29 0.00
TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 45,578,729.13 226,910.04 0.00 226,910.04 0.00
Execution Time: 10/30/2017 10:36:40 AMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11
Attachment 2 4.4.b
Packet Pg. 317
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
T
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
d
g
e
r
-
J
u
l
y
-
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
7
(
Q
1
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
2
0
1
8
)
Page 1 of 3
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Authorization to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor
Prepared by: Nathan Schmidt, Captain Dublin Police Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff has scheduled six marked Police vehicles for replacement during the current fiscal
year based upon general vehicle condition and history of maintenance and repair
expenses. Staff is recommending the purchase of five 2018 Dodge Chargers for patrol
staff and one 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe for the Watch Sergeant vehicle. Comparison
pricing has been obtained for the 2018 Dodge Chargers and Jeep Chrysler Dodge Ram
of Salinas presented the lowest cost. Hubbard Chevrolet was the sole vendor found
selling a new 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Authorizing Staff to Purchase Five Police Vehicles from Jeep
Chrysler Dodge Ram of Salinas and One Police Vehicle from Hubbard Chevrolet and
Declaring Replaced Vehicles as Surplus Property.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The Fiscal Year 2017-18 Internal Service Fund Budget includes funding for the
purchase of six marked vehicles. Any revenue generated from the auction of the retired
vehicles is also deposited into the fund to offset future replacement costs.
DESCRIPTION:
Currently the City has 19 marked police vehicles in the fleet. Marked vehicles are used
by Dublin Police Services patrol, traffic, and crime prevention personnel. In order to
assure reliability and to minimize repair expense, the City reviews replacement of these
vehicles for potential replacement after three years of service and/or 75,000 miles.
Based upon general vehicle condition and the age of units currently in the fleet, Staff
has identified six existing marked vehicles for replacement during Fiscal Year 2017-18:
a 2014 Dodge Charger with over 50,000 miles (#14D01), a 2014 Dodge Charger with
over 70,000 miles (#14D02), a 2014 Dodge Charger with over 60,000 miles (#14D03), a
4.5
Packet Pg. 318
Page 2 of 3
2014 Dodge Charger with over 60,000 miles (#14D10), a 2014 Dodge Charger with
over 56,000 miles (#14D16) and deemed inoperable as a result of being involved in a
traffic collision, and a 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe with over 73,000 miles (14D13).
With the vehicles’ emergency equipment on a six-year replacement schedule, the
current vehicle emergency equipment will be utilized in the new vehicles. To utilize
existing equipment, the replacement vehicles must be the same make and model as the
existing vehicles.
The City Municipal Code establishes the procedures for making purchases and requires
that purchases in excess of $45,000 be awarded by the City Council. The award is to
be made based on formal sealed bids unless one of the allowed exceptions is utilized.
The Municipal Code contains a specific exception to the formal bid process when the
purchase is for vehicles. The exception is shown below:
Section 2.36.100(B)(10) Dublin Municipal Code: When the City Council
specifically waives the competitive bid process and authorizes staff to negotiate
the purchase of vehicles by a four-fifths (4/5) vote. (Ord. 12-12 § 2 (part).
Staff has determined that solicitation of formal bids from car dealerships for the
purchase of Police vehicles is not feasible nor practical and therefore requests the City
Council authorize the purchase through negotiation for the replacement of five marked
vehicles based on negotiated pricing from Jeep Chrysler Dodge Ram of Salinas,
Stoneridge Chrysler Jeep Dodge of Pleasanton, and San Leandro Chrysler Dodge
Jeep. The lowest cost presented for the five Dodge Chargers was by Jeep Chrysler
Dodge Ram of Salinas. The competitive pricing obtained is shown in the table below. It
should be noted that Jeep Chrysler Dodge Ram of Salinas provided a cost to include
the vehicle in the black and white color desired by the department. Stoneridge Chrysler
Jeep Dodge of Pleasanton could not provide the desired color and a quote from an
outside vendor to paint the vehicle was included in the final price listed below.
COMPARISON PRICING 2014 DODGE CHARGER LDDE48 SDN POLICE RWD
(Includes Purchase Price, Sales Tax, Documentation Fee, and Tire Fee)
DEALER COST PER VEHICLE
Jeep Chrysler Dodge Ram of Salinas $26,635.67
Stoneridge Chrysler Jeep Dodge of
Pleasanton
$28,353.67
San Leandro Chrysler Dodge Jeep Refused to Bid
Staff attempted to obtain competitive pricing for the purchase of a new 2016 Chevrolet
Tahoe, however Hubbard Chevrolet was the sole vendor found. Competitive bidding is
not feasible and Staff is seeking the City Council’s approval to purchase the 2016
Chevrolet Tahoe from Hubbard Chevrolet as a sole source of this item. The purchase
price is listed below.
4.5
Packet Pg. 319
Page 3 of 3
PRICING 2016 CHEVROLET TAHOE FROM HUBBARD CHEVROLET
(Includes Purchase Price, Sales Tax, Documentation Fee, and Tire Fee)
COST PER VEHICLE $32,137.52
TAX $2,919.53
PAINT $2,698.48
TOTAL $37,755.53
The current Internal Service Fund Budget contains funding to purchase six vehicles to
replace the 2014 Dodge Charger (Vehicle #14D01), 2014 Dodge Charger (Vehicle
#14D02), 2014 Dodge Charger (Vehicle #14D03), 2014 Dodge Charger (Vehicle
#14D10), 2014 Dodge Charger (Vehicle #14D16), and 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe (Vehicle
#14D13) that are currently in service in the Police fleet.
Upon delivery of the vehicles, Staff will arrange for the emergency equipment to be
removed from the replaced vehicle and installed into the newly purchased vehicles. At
this time, Staff is also requesting City Council authorization to dispose of the replaced
vehicles, by transferring them to a professional auction company for sale.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Authorizing Staff to Purchase Five Police Vehicles from Jeep Chrysler
Dodge Ram of Salinas One Police Vehicle from Hubbard Chevrolet
2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes
3. 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe Quote from Hubbard Chevrolet
4.5
Packet Pg. 320
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. xx - 17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * *
AUTHORIZING STAFF TO PURCHASE FIVE POLICE VEHICLES FROM JEEP CHRYSLER
DODGE RAM OF SALINAS AND ONE POLICE VEHICLE FROM HUBBARD CHEVROLET AND
DECLARING REPLACED VEHICLES AS SURPLUS PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City requires the purchase of marked vehicles for Dublin Police Services
operations; and
WHEREAS, the City follows a process of periodically replacing Police Vehicles based upon
the age of the vehicle and its condition; and
WHEREAS, in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Internal Service Fund Budget funding was included for
the replacement of six marked vehicles; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36.100(B)(10) of the Dublin Municipal Code allows for exceptions to the
typical public bidding process when the City Council specifically waives the competitive bid process
and authorizes Staff to negotiate the purchase of vehicles by a four-fifths vote; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36.100(B)(1) of the Dublin Municipal Code allows for exceptions to the
typical public bidding process when the city’s requirement can be met solely by a single vendor; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.36.150 of the Dublin Municipal Code provides for the Purchasing Agent
to recommend the sale or disposal of all supplies and equipment which cannot be used by the city, or
which have become unsuitable for city use; and
WHEREAS, as presented in a Staff Report on December 5, 2017, Staff has obtained
competitive pricing from three Dodge dealers for comparably equipped vehicles and it is
recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of five vehicles from Jeep Chrysler
Dodge Ram of Salinas at a cost of $26,635.67 per vehicle and one vehicle from Hubbard Chevrolet
identified as a sole source at a cost of $32,137.52 as allowed under Chapter 2.36 of the Dublin
Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby
authorizes the City Manager as Purchasing Agent to procure in Fiscal Year 2017-18 five
replacement marked Police vehicles from Jeep Chrysler Dodge Ram of Salinas and one replacement
marked Police vehicle from Hubbard Chevrolet as described to the City Council on December 5,
2017.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon placing the new vehicles in service, the replaced
vehicles are declared surplus property to be sold at auction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager and/or her designee shall be authorized
to arrange for the auction of surplus City property in accordance with state and local laws and
regulations.
4.5.a
Packet Pg. 321
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
i
n
g
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
F
i
v
e
P
o
l
i
c
e
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
f
r
o
m
J
e
e
p
C
h
r
y
s
l
e
r
D
o
d
g
e
R
a
m
o
f
S
a
l
i
n
a
s
O
n
e
P
o
l
i
c
e
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
ATTACHMENT 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December 2017, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
City Clerk
4.5.a
Packet Pg. 322
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
i
n
g
S
t
a
f
f
t
o
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
F
i
v
e
P
o
l
i
c
e
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
f
r
o
m
J
e
e
p
C
h
r
y
s
l
e
r
D
o
d
g
e
R
a
m
o
f
S
a
l
i
n
a
s
O
n
e
P
o
l
i
c
e
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
3
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
4
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
5
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
6
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
7
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
8
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
2
9
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
3
0
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
3
1
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
3
2
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
3
3
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
b
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
3
4
Attachment: 2. 2018 Dodge Charger Quotes (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
4.
5
.
c
Pa
c
k
e
t
P
g
.
3
3
5
Attachment: 3. 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe Quote from Hubbard Chevrolet (Authorization of Staff to Purchase Police Vehicles Directly from Vendor)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Authorization to Order Computer Supplies through CDW Government,
LLC and MNJ Technologies
Prepared by: Renuka Dhadwal, Administrative Aide
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider the use of CDW Government, LLC (CDW-G) and MNJ
Technologies (MNJ) as the City’s primary vendors for computer related software and
supplies for the City’s daily business operations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the City Manager to approve computer related software and supplies
purchases annually through CDW-G and MNJ.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The funding to purchase computer related supplies is included in the Internal Service
Fund approved by the City Council as part of the annual budget process.
DESCRIPTION:
Over the last several years, the City has been using CDW Government, LLC (CDW-G)
and MNJ Technologies (MNJ) for computer related purchases for its daily business
operations. CDW-G and MNJ have provided competitive pricing for all software and
hardware needs of the City.
The purchases thus far have been under the $45,000 threshold outlined in the Municipal
Code, and have therefore not required City Council approval. The City has typically
utilized Microsoft products for its desktop and server operating systems as well as office
applications.
Staff periodically explores new products and improved solutions for the City's daily
operations by meeting with a variety of vendors and participating in product
demonstrations. CDW-G and MNJ products were well received by Staff and have
competitive pricing through the Riverside County Contract (attached); as such Staff is
4.6
Packet Pg. 336
Page 2 of 2
requesting City Council approval of the use of CDW-G and MNJ as the primary vendors
of software and hardware products.
Section 2.36.100.A.9 of the City's Purchasing Policy provides an exemption to a
competitive bidding process when another public agency has administered a
competitive bidding process and has a current valid agreement for the same or
substantially similar consultant or professional services, general services, supplies or
equipment. In 2011, the Riverside County, in conjunction with California County
Information Services Directors Association (CCISDA) and Municipal Information
Services Association of California (MISAC), conducted a bidding process to offer the
same pricing for software licenses to participating California state and local government
agencies.
Staff is recommending that the City Council authorize the City Manager or designee to
approve such purchases in excess of $45,000 annually through CDW-G and MNJ.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Riverside County Agreement
4.6
Packet Pg. 337
4.6.a
Packet Pg. 338
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
&
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
)
4.6.a
Packet Pg. 339
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
i
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
&
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
)
Page 1 of 4
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3) Planned Development
Rezone with a Related Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development
Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437 (PLPA 2017 -00036)
Prepared by: Martha Battaglia, Associate Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing to construct a residential project
comprised of 220 apartment units, and related amenities including a fitness center, pool,
roof top lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parking on an approximately 2.36-acre
site located within the Dublin Transit Center. The proposed mix of residential units
includes 122 one-bedroom units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroom units.
The site has a land use designation of High Density Residential (25.1 or greater units
per acre). The application includes a Planned Development Rezone with a related
Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437
for condominium purposes. Staff recommends that the project be found exempt from
CEQA pursuant to Government Code 65457 for residential projects that are consistent
with a specific plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and a take the following actions: a) Waive the
reading and INTRODUCE an Ordinance Approving a Planned Development Rezone
District and Related Stage 2 Development Plan for the Transit Center Site A-3, APN:
986-0034-009-00, PLPA 2017-00036; and, b) Adopt the Resolution Approving A Site
Development Review Permit and Tentative Map 8437 for the Transit Center Site A-3
Project, APN: 986-0034-009-00, PLPA-2017-00036.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No financial impact to the City. All costs associated with this request are borne by the
Applicant.
6.1
Packet Pg. 341
Page 2 of 4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Background
The Dublin Transit Center area generally is bounded on the north by Dublin Boulevard,
on the south by Interstate 580 and the existing Dublin/Pleasanton BART station, on the
east by Arnold Road, and on the west by the Iron Horse Trail (Figure 1).
In December 2002, the City Council adopted entitlements establishing the Transit
Center. This included General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments
(Resolution 216-02), a Planned Development Rezone with a Stage 1 Development Plan
(Ordinance 21-02), and subsequently, a Master Development Agreement (Ordinance 5-
03) adopted in 2003. Together, these entitlements allow development of up to 1,500
residential units on Sites A, B and C of the Transit Center. Sites A, B and C have been
developed with the exception of Site A-3, which is the subject of this Staff Report.
Project Site
Site A-3 is the last remaining site with a residential land use designation in the Transit
Center. The 2.36-acre site is located south of a private street, east and north of
Campbell Lane, and west of DeMarcus Boulevard as shown in Figure 1. The site has a
General Plan and EDSP land use designation of High Density Residential and Planned
Development Zoning with a Stage 1 Development Plan.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Current Request
The property owner, Ashton at Dublin Station is requesting approval of a 220-unit
apartment building, with residential amenities including of a fitness center, pool, roof top
lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parking. The proposed mix of residential units
includes 122 one-bedroom units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroom units.
The following is a brief overview of the requested entitlements. Please refer to the
Planning Commission Staff Report (Attachment 1) for a complete analysis of the project.
6.1
Packet Pg. 342
Page 3 of 4
Planned Development Zoning - Planned Development Rezone with a related
Stage 2 Development Plan (Attachment 2).
Site Development Review Permit - To construct a 220-unit apartment project,
with related amenities and structured parking with 331 spaces (Attachment 3 and
4).
Tentative Map 8437 - For condominium purposes (Attachment 3 and 4).
The City Council is being requested to take action on the Ashton at Dublin Station
project because it includes an approval for which the City Council is the decision maker
(i.e. the Planned Development Zoning). Consistent with past practice, the Planning
Commission is the reviewing body and the City Council is the decision making body for
this entire project application.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:
The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on November 14, 2017 to review the
proposed project (Attachment 5). Six members of the public spoke in opposition to the
project. The City also received thirteen comment letters regarding the proposed project
(Attachment 6). After conducting the Public Hearing, the Planning Commission
recommended that the City Council approve the proposed project (Attachments 7, 8 and
9).
PUBLIC NOTICING:
In accordance with State law, a public notice was mailed to all property owners and
occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project to advertise the project and posted at
several locations throughout the City. A copy of this Staff Report has been provided to
the Applicant.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The City has determined that the project qualifies for a statutory exemption from CEQA
under Government Code section 65457. The proposed project is consistent with the
General Plan Land Use Designation for Site A-3 and does not exceed the units allowed
by the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning. An EIR has been
certified for the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning. The CEQA
document in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption finds that no event as specified in
Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code has occurred since the certification of the
Dublin Transit Specific Plan EIR that requires preparation of a supplemental CEQA
document. Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
identify the conditions requiring subsequent environmental review. After a review of
these conditions, the City has determined that no subsequent EIR or Negative
Declaration is required for this project.
The CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption is included as Attachment
10. The 2002 Dublin Transit Center EIR, upon which the exemption relies, is available
for review at the Planning Division in City Hall during normal business hours.
6.1
Packet Pg. 343
Page 4 of 4
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 14, 2017 without attachments
2. Ordinance Rezoning the Dublin Transit Center Site A-3 Project Site to PD-Planned
Development and Approving a Stage 2 Development Plan
3. Resolution Approving a Site Development Review Permit and Tentative Map 8437 for
the Dublin Transit Center Site A-3 Project
4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map
5. Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated November 14, 2017
6. Public Comment Letters
7. Planning Commission Resolution 17-12 Recommending that the City Council Adopt
an Ordinance Rezoning the Dublin Transit Center Site A-3
8. Planning Commission Resolution 17-13 Recommending that the City Council
Approve the Site Development Review for Site A-3
9. Planning Commission Resolution 17-14 Recommending that the City Council
Approve the Tentative Map for Site A-3
10. Ashton at Dublin Station CEQA Analysis Update
6.1
Packet Pg. 344
Page 1 of 11
STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE: November 14, 2017
TO: Planning Commission
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC HEARING: Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A -3)
Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2 Development Plan,
Site Development Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437 (PLPA 2017-
00036)
Prepared by: Martha Battaglia, Associate Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing to construct a residential project
comprised of 220 apartment units, and related amenities including a fitness center, pool,
roof top lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parking on an approximately 2.36-acre
site located within the Dublin Transit Center. The proposed mix of residential units
includes 122 one-bedroom units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroom units.
The site has a land use designation of High Density Residential (25.1 or greater units
per acre). The application includes a Planned Development Rezone with a related
Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437
for condominium purposes. The Planning Commission will review the proposed project
and make a recommendation to the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
Disclose ex-parte contacts, conduct the public hearing, deliberate and adopt the
following Resolutions: a) Recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance
rezoning the Dublin Transit Center Site A-3 project site to PD-Planned Development
and approving a Stage 2 Development Plan; and b) Recommending that the City
Council approve the Site Development Review Permit and Tentative Map 8437 for the
Dublin Transit Center Site A-3 project.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Background
The Dublin Transit Center area generally is bounded on the north by Dublin Boulevard,
on the south by Interstate 580 and the existing Dublin/Pleasanton BART station, on the
east by Arnold Road, and on the west by the Iron Horse Trail (Figure 1).
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 345
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 2 of 11
In December 2002, the City Council adopted entitlements establishing the Transit
Center. This included General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments
(Resolution 216-02) to incorporate this area into the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area
and establishing land uses. The project included Planned Development Zoning with a
Stage 1 Development Plan (Ordinance 21-02) which established the permitted uses;
site areas and proposed densities; maximum number of residential units and non-
residential square footage; and a Master Landscaping Plan. The approval also included
a Master Development Agreement (Ordinance 5-03) approved in May 2003.
The Dublin Transit Center project area allows for the development of 1,500 residential
units on Sites A, B and C; two million square feet of campus office and up to 300
residential units on Sites D and E; and 70,000 square feet of retail uses at street level
on Sites B through E, and a 1-acre Village Green located between Sites B and C. Sites
A, B and C have been developed with the exception of Site A-3, which is the subject of
this Staff Report.
Project Site
Site A-3 is the last remaining site with a residential land use designation in the Transit
Center. The 2.36 acre site is located south of a private street, east and north of
Campbell Lane, and west of DeMarcus Boulevard as shown in Figure 1. The site has a
General Plan and EDSP land use designation of High Density Residential and Planned
Development Zoning with a Stage 1 Development Plan.
Figure 1. Vicinity
Map
The project site is rectangular in shape and has a relatively flat topography. The project
site is paved and has previously been used as a parking lot and a construction staging
area. There are no permanent structures, existing drainage courses, or native
vegetation located on the site. Surrounding street improvements are limited to curb s
and gutters along DeMarcus Boulevard and Campbell Lane. This vacant site is
surrounded by existing developments (Table 1).
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 346
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 3 of 11
Table 1. Surrounding Land Uses
LOCATION ZONING GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE
CURRENT USE OF
PROPERTY Building Height
North PD High Density
Residential
Camellia Place –
112 units
53 feet
3 stories over 1
level of parking
South PD Public/Semi-Public PG&E Substation N/A
East PD High Density
Residential
Elan – 257 multi-
family townhomes &
condominiums
65 feet
5 stories over
parking
West PD Medium-High Density
Residential
Tribeca – 52
townhomes
40 feet
3 stories
Current Request
Ashton at Dublin Station is requesting approval of a 220-unit apartment building, which
includes residential amenities consisting of a fitness center, pool, roof top lounge, and
331 spaces of structured parking. The proposed mix of residential units includes 122
one-bedroom units, 79 two-bedroom units and 19 three-bedroom units.
The current request for the proposed project includes:
Planned Development Zoning - Planned Development Rezone with a related
Stage 2 Development Plan.
Site Development Review Permit - Site Development Review Permit for 220
apartment units, with related amenities and structured parking with 331 spaces.
Subdivision - Tentative Map 8437 for condominium purposes.
ANALYSIS:
Planned Development Zoning
The application includes a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2
Development Plan. The existing Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development
Plan established a maximum building height for high density residential of 5 stories over
parking and a parking standard of 1.5 spaces per unit for residential land uses.
The project site is part of Site A, an 8.29 net acre area delineated as Sites A-1, A-2 and
A-3. The Planned Development Zoning originally anticipated up to 530 units across all
of Site A. The number was later reduced to 430 units when 100 units were transferred
to Site C. The total number of units constructed in the Dublin Transit Center project
area, including the proposed project, would be 1,451 units. This is 46 units less than
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 347
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 4 of 11
anticipated for Site A, and 49 units less than the total allocation of 1,500 units for the
overall Transit Center, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Transit Center Residential Development
Site Project Name Units
Constructed/Proposed
Units
Permitted Difference
A-1 Tribeca (52 Units)
384 430 46 A-2 Camellia Place (112
Units)
A-3 Ashton @ Dublin Station
(220 units)
B-1 Elan (257 Units) 562 565 3 B-2 Eclipse (305 units)
C-1 Avalon (505 units) 505 505 ---
Total 1,451 1,500 49
The proposed Stage 2 Planned Development Zoning is in compliance with the
requirements of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance and will establish the detailed
development plan for the site. This includes a preliminary site plan, development
standards, architectural standards, and a preliminary landscape.
The project is compatible with the land use concept to maximize transit opportunities
presented by the adjacent Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station; conforms to the
development standards adopted for the Dublin Transit Center; and contributes to a
vibrant, pedestrian friendly environment.
A Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance approving the
Planned Development Rezone with related Stage 2 Development Plan for the Dublin
Transit Center Site A-3 is included as Attachment 1, with the draft City Council
Ordinance included as Exhibit A.
Site Development Review
Site Plan
The primary entry lobby is located near the northwest corner of DeMarcus Boulevard
and Campbell Lane. The primary entry lobby that fronts on this corner has a two story
volume and is set back to accommodate a pedestrian plaza. A secondary entry lobby is
located mid-block on the north side of the building along the private street that is shared
with Camellia Place. Similar to the primary entry, the building is set back creating a
smaller pedestrian plaza with landscaping. Vehicle access to the structured parking will
be through a garage entry located on Campbell Lane. The project includes frontage
improvements and landscaping consistent with the improvements throughout the Transit
Center.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 348
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 5 of 11
Residential amenities including a lobby, fitness center and a leasing office
(approximately 6,200 square feet) are proposed along DeMarcus Boulevard. Ground-
floor residential units with front stoops are proposed on the north elevation, which
enhance the residential scale and character established by the Camellia Place
residential project across the street.
Architecture
The project architecture has a contemporary aesthetic with angular lines and includes a
variety of high quality exterior materials and colors. Façade treatments include stucco,
fiber cement and metal accent, metal window surrounds, limited areas of storefront
glazing and metal and translucent entry canopies. Balconies and screening inserts used
within the garage include translucent perforated metal screening.
The proposed project includes unique architectural features and massing elements to
provide visual interest as well as open space for the occupants. The design includes
two opposing yet complementary tilted overhanging roof forms which accentuate the
taller massing elements of the building. The roof design allows the top-level units to
have generous windows and optimized views of the surrounding area. The project’s
design provides visual interest as viewed from Interstate 580 to the south and the
pedestrian pathways along DeMarcus Boulevard and Campbell Lane. The design of the
east podium courtyard allows glimpse in from the surrounding area and also provides a
strong pedestrian visual scale for the project.
The two-story parking podium façades face Campbell Lane to the west and south. The
parking garage has been designed to include architectural elements that provide
functional screening as well as visual interest. The façade of the parking structure is
comprised of framed openings which provide articulation and depth along the ground
floor. Infill surfaces fill the frames and angle inward in varying directions.
The architecture elements described can be seen in the renderings below.
Aerial at SE corner – Campbell Lane & DeMarcus Blvd.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 349
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 6 of 11
The massing of the proposed building is consistent with the scale of the adjacen t
buildings with the tallest massing located at the east side of the project opposite the
adjacent buildings along DeMarcus Boulevard (Elan and Avalon). The lowest massing is
located on the west side opposite the lower height townhouses across Campbell Lan e
(Tribeca). The proposed range of building heights, including 3, 4 and 5 residential
stories, over parking podium gives the project a sense of visual interest and variation in
roof profile, and it enables the building to respond contextually to the preexisting
massing variation within the Transit Center.
A feature of the building projects over a portion of the sidewalk adjacent to Campbell
Lane. The total projection area is approximately 300 square feet as shown in Figure 2
below. The projection into the right-of-way includes living space, balconies and roof
overhang. The projection starts on the third floor at 23 feet above grade so as not to
conflict with use of the sidewalk.
SE corner – Campbell Lane & DeMarcus Blvd. NE corner – DeMarcus Blvd.
SW corner – Campbell Lane NW corner – Campbell Lane
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 350
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 7 of 11
Figure 2. Right Of Way Projection
The City will quitclaim fee title ownership of the area with the proposed building
projection, while reserving a public access easement and a utility easement over the
area. These easements will allow for continued use of this area by the public and utility
companies.
Landscaping
The landscaping has been designed to be consistent with and completes the
streetscape as identified in the Design Guidelines for the overall Dublin Transit Center.
Similar to other higher density residential developments, landscaping and recreational
amenities are used to provide quality open areas and visual relief.
Plantings and hardscape elements are used to create neighborhood identification and
an attractive community entry. Colored concrete unit pavers connect the project site
with the rest of the Dublin Transit Center, while helping to define the main entries and
gathering spaces.
The landscape plan includes trees, along with flowering shrubs and groundcover, which
line and define the project entry. Perimeter areas are proposed to be landscaped with a
variety of drought tolerant plant materials that are low maintenance and encourage
water conservation. Please refer to Sheets L2.00-L5.00 of the attached plans (Exhibit A
to the City Council Resolution) for the proposed plant palette.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 351
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 8 of 11
The project includes two podium level roof courtyards and a swimming pool on the third
floor. Amphitheater stair seating is proposed near the project’s southeast corner within
the pedestrian plaza. Benches and raised planters are located throughout the
landscape public spaces.
There is a 20’ storm drain easement located along the eastern property boundary along
DeMarcus Boulevard. This easement area is planted with a variety of taller flowering
shrubs and succulents that delineate the space without using fences or walls .
In compliance with water quality requirements, flow through planters are located on the
northern portion of the project site and within the open courtyard areas. The plantings
within these areas include grasses and flowering plants.
Private sidewalks with public access are proposed on all four frontages. The project
includes a variety of site lighting, including tree uplight, pool & spa lighting, stake
mounted LED lights along pathways, recessed planter wall lights and decorative string
lights. The conceptual lighting plan is shown on Sheet L6.00 of the attached plans.
Floor Plans
The project includes a mix of studio, one, two and three-bedroom flats that vary in size
and layout. The floor plans are shown on Sheet A21 of the attached plans. Access to
the units would be primarily from interior corridors with exception to the stoop units
along the private street facing Camellia Place to the north. An open-air bridge
comprised primarily of perforated metal screen is visible from the south elevation and
provides a connection across the eastern podium.
Table 3 below details the square footage of the individual units as well as the
percentage of each unit type within the project.
TABLE 3. Floor Plans
Unit Type Square Footage # of Units % of Project
Jr. 1 Bedroom 640 SF 22 10.0%
1 Bedroom 800 SF 92 41.8%
1+ Bedroom 975 SF 8 3.6%
2 Bedroom 1,120 SF 79 35.9%
3 Bedroom 1,280 SF 19 8.6%
Total 100%
Parking
The Development Regulations for the Dublin Transit Center require 1.5 parking spaces
per unit, which includes guest parking. Based on this standard, a total of 330 spaces
would be required. The proposed project provides 331 spaces located within a two–
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 352
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 9 of 11
story podium parking garage. Fifteen percent (15%) of the required parking spaces (50
spaces) are unassigned guest parking spaces. Additionally, surface stalls will be located
on the public streets along the project frontage, which are not included in the parking
requirement for the project.
Bicycle storage parking is provided on the first floor of the parking garage. A total of 130
bicycle parking stalls are provided.
Affordable Housing/Inclusionary Zoning
The Dublin Transit Center requires 15% of the residential units be affordable units. The
Camellia Place apartment project on Site A-2 has been used to satisfy the very low and
low portion of the inclusionary housing requirement for the project. Ten percent (10%) of
the units in the proposed project are required to be affordable to moderate income
household earning between 80% and 120% of the area median income adjusted for
actual household size. The affordable units are required to reflect the range of numbers
of bedrooms provided in the project. The applicant proposes to provide the required
number of moderate income units (22) which will include a range of one, two and three-
bedroom units. A Condition of Approval has been placed on the project that requires the
applicant to enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement.
Public Art Compliance
The project is part of a comprehensive plan to provide public art as part of the Dublin
Transit Center project. The public art requirement has already bene satisfied.
Tentative Map
Although the project is proposed for occupancy as apartments, the Applicant is
requesting approval of a Tentative Map for condominium purposes as is common with
other recent apartment projects.
A Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Site Development
Review Permit and Tentative Map is included as Attachment 2, with the draft City
Council Resolution included as Exhibit A.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE:
The project site has a current General Plan and EDSP land use designation of High
Density Residential and consistent Planned Development Zoning. The proposed project
is consistent with the land use designation and zoning. The project will contribute to
housing opportunities and diversity of product type and complement the surrounding
neighborhoods.
The proposed project has been reviewed for conformance with the Community Design
and Sustainability Element of the General Plan. The project has been designed to be
compatible with adjacent and surrounding development. Pedestrian circulation and
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 353
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 10 of 11
gathering spaces have all been linked together with sidewalks and public and private
streets. In general, the proposed project furthers the goals of the Community Design
and Sustainability Element of the General Plan by providing a high quality of life and
preserving resources and opportunities for future generations.
REVIEW BY APPLICABLE DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES:
The Building Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Public Works Department, and Dublin
San Ramon Services District reviewed the project and provided Conditions of Approval
where appropriate to ensure that the Project is established in compliance with all local
Ordinances and Regulations. Conditions of Approval from these departments and
agencies have been included in the attached Resolution pertaining to the Site
Development Review Permit and Tentative Map (Exhibit A to Attachment 2).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The City has determined that the project qualifies for a statutory exemption from CEQA
under Government Code section 65457. The proposed project is consistent with the
General Plan Land Use Designation for Site A-3 and does not exceed the units allowed
by the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning. An EIR has been
certified for the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning. The CEQA
document in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption finds that no event as specified in
Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code has occurred since the certification of the
Dublin Transit Specific Plan EIR that requires preparation of a supplemental CEQA
document. Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
identify the conditions requiring subsequent environmental review. After a review of
these conditions, the City has determined that no subsequent EIR or Negative
Declaration is required for this project.
The CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption is included as Attachment
3. The 2002 Dublin Transit Center EIR, upon which the exemption relies, is available
for review at the Planning Division in City Hall during normal business hours.
PUBLIC NOTICING:
In accordance with State law, a public notice was mailed to all property owners and
occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project to advertise the project and the and
posted at several locations throughout the City. A copy of this Staff Report has b een
provided to the Applicant.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. PC Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance Rezoning the
Dublin Transit Center Site A-3
1a. Exhibit A to Attachment 1
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 354
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
Page 11 of 11
2. PC Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the SDR & Tentative
Map for site A-3
2a. Exhibit A to Attachment 2
2b. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution approving the SDR & Tentative Map
3. Ashton at Dublin Station_CEQA Analysis
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 355
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
1
ORDINANCE NO. XX – 17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE DISTRICT AND RELATED STAGE 2
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA 2017-00036
The Dublin City Council does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS
A. The Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, proposes to construct a residential project
comprised of 220 apartment units, residential amenities including a fitness center, pool, roof top
lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parking on an approximately 2.36-acre site. The
applications include a Planned Development rezoning with a related Stage 2 Development Plan,
Site Development Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437 for condominium purposes. The
proposed development and applications are collectively known as the “Project”.
B. The project site is approximately 2.36 acres located at the northwest corner of Campbell
Lane and DeMarcus Boulevard (APN 986-0034-009-00).
C. To comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State guidelines and
City environmental regulations, the City prepared a CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan
Exemption.
D. Following a public hearing on November 14, 2017, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution 17-12, recommending approval of the Planned Development Rezone and related
Stage 2 Development Plan, which resolution is incorporated herein by reference and available
for review at City Hall during normal business hours.
E. A Staff Report, dated December 5, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference, described
and analyzed the project, including the Planned Development Rezone and related Stage 2
Development Plan, for the City Council.
F. On December 5, 2017, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the project,
including the proposed Planned Development Rezone and related Stage 2 Development Plan,
at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard.
H. The City Council considered the CEQA Analysis and related prior CEQA documents and all
above referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony prior to taking action on the project.
SECTION 2: FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Section 8.32.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows.
1. The Transit Center Site A-3 Project Planned Development zoning meets the purpose and
intent of Chapter 8.32 in that it provides a comprehensive development plan that creates
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 356
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
i
t
e
t
o
P
D
-
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
t
a
g
e
2
2
a desirable use of land that is sensitive to surrounding land uses by virtue of the layout
and design of the site plan.
2. Development of the project under the Planned Development zoning and the related
Stage 2 Development Plan will be harmonious and compatible with existing and future
development in the surrounding area in that the site will provide residential development
consistent with the surrounding development. The proposed project maintains the urban
character anticipated by the existing approvals for the Transit Center including the
existing Planned Development Zoning and Stage 1 Development Plan. The proposed
project will contribute to housing opportunities and diversity of product type as a
complement to the surrounding neighborhoods.
B. Pursuant to Sections 8.120.050.A and B of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds
as follows.
1. The Planned Development zoning for the project and the related Stage 2 Development
Plan will be harmonious and compatible with existing and potential development in the
surrounding area in that the proposed site plan has taken into account a land use type
and density that is compatible with the adjacent areas and densities. In addition, the
massing of the proposed building is consistent with the scale of the adjacent buildings
with the tallest masses located at the east side opposite the adjacent buildings along
DeMarcus Boulevard (Elan and Avalon), and the lowest masses located on the west side
opposite the lower townhouses across Campbell Lane (Tribeca).
2. The project site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the zoning district being
proposed in that the project site is flat with improved streets on four sides and served by
existing public utilities. The project site conditions are documented in the CEQA Analysis
for this project and prior certified Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), and the project will
implement all adopted mitigation measures, as applicable. There are no site conditions
that were identified in the CEQA Analysis that will present an impediment to development
of the site for the proposed residential development. There are no major physical or
topographic constraints and thus the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of
the residential development approved through the Planned Development zoning.
3. The Planned Development zoning will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or be detrimental to the public health, safety and
welfare in that the project will comply with all applicable development regulations and
standards and will implement all adopted mitigation measures, as applicable. The project
uses are compatible with surrounding uses.
4. The Planned Development zoning is consistent with the Dublin General Plan and the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, in that the proposed residential density and uses are
consistent with the High Density Residential land use designation for the site.
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council finds as follows:
1. The project is found to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code section
65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a Specific Plan. The project is
within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Transit Center
General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 357
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
i
t
e
t
o
P
D
-
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
t
a
g
e
2
3
Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH
2001120395) which was certified by the City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated
November 19, 2002. The CEQA Analysis prepared for the project is incorporated herein
by this reference and determined that no event as specified in Section 21166 of the
Public Recourses Code has occurred since the certification of the Dublin Transit
Specific Plan EIR that requires preparation of a Supplemental CEQA document.
SECTION 3: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code the City of Dublin Zoning
Map is amended to rezone the property described below to a Planned Development Zoning
District:
2.36 acres at the northwest corner of Campbell Lane and DeMarcus Boulevard (APN
986-0034-009-00).) (“Project site”, or “Property”).
A map of the rezoning area is shown below:
SECTION 4. APPROVAL OF STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the project site are
set forth in the following Stage 2 Development Plan for the project area, which is hereby
approved. Any amendments to the Stage 2 Development Plan shall be in accordance with
section 8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal Code or its successors.
Stage 2 Development Plan for the Transit Center Site A-3 Project
This is a Stage 2 Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
This Development Plan meets all the requirements for the Stage 2 Development Plan set forth
in Chapter 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance and is adopted as part of the Planned Development
Rezone for the Transit Center Site A-3 project, PLPA-2017-00036.
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 358
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
i
t
e
t
o
P
D
-
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
t
a
g
e
2
4
The Planned Development District allows flexibility needed to encourage innovative
development while ensuring that the goals, policies and action programs of the General Plan,
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and provisions of Chapter 8.32, Planned Development Zoning
District of the Zoning Ordinance are satisfied.
1. Statement of Compatibility with Stage 1 Development Plan.
The Ashton at Dublin Station Stage 2 Development Plan is consistent with the Stage 1
Development Plan for Site A of the Dublin Transit Center, in that it provides for High Density
Residential uses as approved in Ordinance 21-02.
2. Statement of Uses.
Permitted, Conditional and Accessory Uses shall be as adopted by Ordinance 21-02, the
Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning Development Plan (PA00-013).
3. Stage 2 Site Plan.
The site plan shall generally be as shown in the conceptual site plan below.
4. Site area, proposed densities.
Site Area: 2.36 acres
Density: 25+ dwelling units/acre
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 359
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
i
t
e
t
o
P
D
-
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
t
a
g
e
2
5
5. Development Regulations.
The following development regulations are in addition to those identified in the Planned
Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan (Ordinance 21-02).
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
Maximum Number of Units 220
Maximum Number of 3 Bedroom Units 12%
Maximum Building Height 85 feet
Minimum Common Outdoor Space 15%(1)
(1) Percentage of total site acreage.
6. Preliminary/Master Neighborhood Landscape Plan.
The street level landscape shall be as generally depicted below and shall comply with the
Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan and Design Guidelines and reflect the following
standards:
Create comfortable outdoor spaces for residents and visitors, which include amenities
such as planting areas, seat walls with stone blocks that serve as outdoor seating,
and podium courtyards.
Create a visual buffer and soften the edge between the public realm and the site.
Treat stormwater runoff on the site through the utilization of flow through planters and
mechanical devices.
Utilize plants that provide a year round vegetated landscape with seasonality, color,
and interest for an attractive visual environment.
7. Architectural Standards.
The architectural design of the project shall reflect the following standards:
Utilize a contemporary architecture style.
Employ high quality materials to provide visual interest in the project and to
complement its surroundings.
Incorporate features such as different wall planes, heights, wall textures, roof
elements, light fixtures and landscaping to contribute layers of detail at the
pedestrian level.
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 360
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
i
t
e
t
o
P
D
-
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
t
a
g
e
2
6
Provide functional outdoor plazas where people can gather and socialize, with
landscaping, outdoor seating, enhanced paving treatment, and other features to
provide an appropriate urban scale for the development.
Illustrative examples of architectural style:
8. Aerial Photo.
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 361
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
i
t
e
t
o
P
D
-
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
t
a
g
e
2
7
9. Applicable Requirements of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
Except as specifically provided in the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Planned Development
Zoning Development Plan (Ordinance 21-02) and this Stage 2 Development Plan, the use,
development, improvements and maintenance of the property shall be governed by the
provisions of the closest comparable Zoning District as determined by the Community
Development Director and of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance pursuant to Section 8.32.060.C.
No development shall occur on this property until a Site Development Review Permit has
been approved for the property.
SECTION 5. POSTING OF ORDINANCE
The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3)
public spaces in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of
the State of California.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days following its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this _________
day of _____________ 2017, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036 Parcel A-3 Stage 2 PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\CC Attachments\2. City Council Ordinance rezoning the Dublin Transit Center A-3
project site to PD-Planned Development.DOC
6.1.b
Packet Pg. 362
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
S
i
t
e
t
o
P
D
-
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
t
a
g
e
2
RESOLUTION NO. xx-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
************
APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT AND TENTATIVE MAP 8437 FOR
THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3 PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA-2017-00036 WHEREAS, the Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing to construct a residential project comprised of 220 units, residential amenities including a fitness center, pool, roof top lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parking on an approximately 2.36-acre site located on Site A-3 in the Dublin Transit Center. The proposed development and applications are collectively known as the “Project”; and
WHEREAS, the applications include Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage
2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and Tentative Map 8437; and
WHEREAS, the Project Site is located at the northwest corner of Campbell Lane and
DeMarcus Boulevard within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, and more specifically within
the Dublin Transit Center Village area; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State
guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that certain projects be reviewed for
environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. To comply with CEQA,
the City prepared a CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommends that the project be found exempt from CEQA pursuant to
Government Code 65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan. The
project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Transi t
Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned
Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395)
which was certified by the City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The
CEQA analysis prepared for the project is incorporated herein by this reference and determined
that no event as specified in Section 21166 of the Public Recourses Code has occurred since
the certification of the Dublin Transit Specific Plan EIR that requires preparation of a
Supplemental CEQA document; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated November 14, 2017 was submitted to the Planning
Commission recommending City Council approval of the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on the
project on November 14, 2017, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be
heard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 17-12 recommending the City
Council adopt an Ordinance approving the Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2
Development Pan; and
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 363
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolutions 17-13 and 17-14
recommending the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the Site Development Review
Permit and Tentative Map; and
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2017, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on
the Project at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report dated December 5, 2017 and incorporated herein by
reference, described and analyzed the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use its independent judgement and considered
all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth before approving the
Project; and
WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the City Council adopted Ordinance xx-17
approving the Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2 Development Plan. The
above Ordinance is incorporated herein by reference and is available for review at City Hall
during normal business hours.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the above recitals are true and correct and
made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby makes
the following findings and determinations regarding the proposed Site Development Review
Permit for Site A-3 of the Dublin Transit Center.
A. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 8.104 of the Zoning
Ordinance, with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plans and design
guidelines because: 1) The project is compatible with the architectural character and
scale of development in the immediate area in which the proposed project is to be
located; 2) the project is utilizing contemporary, high-quality materials and finishes; 3)
the project will provide a needed and attractive housing opportunity adjacent to the
East Dublin/Pleasanton BART station; 4) the project is consistent with the General
Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use designation of High Density
Residential; and 5) the project is consistent with the Transit Center Stage 1 Planned
Development Zoning in that it provides additional housing opportunities in close
proximity to the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART station.
B. The proposal is consistent with the provisions of Title 8, Zoning Ordinance because:
1) the project contributes to the orderly, attractive, and harmonious site and
architectural development that is compatible with the architectural style, intensity of
development, and context of surrounding and adjacent properties; and 2) the project
complies with the development standards established in the Planned Development
Ordinance for the project site.
C. The design of the project is appropriate to the City, the vicinity, surrounding
properties, and the lot(s) in which the project is proposed because: 1) the size and
mass of the proposed buildings are consistent with other residential development in
the immediate vicinity and in compliance with the permitted development
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 364
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
3
density/intensity; 2) the project will contribute to housing opportunities as a
complement to the surrounding neighborhoods; and 3) the project includes
landscaping and recreational amenities that provide high quality open areas and
visual relief.
D. The subject site is suitable for the type and intensity of the approved development
because: 1) the project site is flat and contains no physical impediments to the
proposed residential development; 2) the project will implement all applicable prior
adopted mitigation measures; 3) the project site is fully served by public services and
existing roadways; and 4) the project design and intensity complements the major
public investment in transit.
E. Impacts to existing slopes and topographic features are addressed because : 1) the
project site is already urbanized and relatively flat; 2) the roadway and utility
infrastructure to serve the site already exists, and 3) the project site has been
previously graded and is relatively flat.
F. Architectural considerations including the character, scale and quality of the design,
site layout, the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings, screening of
unsightly uses, lighting, building materials and colors and similar elements result in a
project that is harmonious with its surroundings and compatible with other
developments in the vicinity because: 1) the architectural style and materials will be
consistent and compatible with the contemporary architectural style, colors, and
materials being utilized on other multi-family projects in the immediate vicinity; 2) the
project is utilizing contemporary, high-quality materials and finishes; 3) the project’s
design provides visual interest as viewed from Interstate 580 to the south and the
pedestrian pathways along DeMarcus Boulevard and Campbell Lane; and 4) the size
and scale of the development will be similar to multi-family projects already
constructed in the immediate project vicinity.
G. Landscape considerations, including the location, type, size, color, texture and
coverage of plant materials, and similar elements have been incorporated into the
project to ensure visual relief, adequate screening and an attractive environment for
the public because: 1) landscaping is proposed to provide visual relief within an urban
development; 2) the landscaping has been designed to be consistent with the Design
Guidelines for the overall Dublin Transit Center; 3) the project’s landscaping provides
open space and visual relief; and 4) the project will conform to the requirements of the
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
H. The site has been adequately designed to ensure the proper circulation for bicyclist,
pedestrians, and automobiles because: 1) all infrastructure including driveways,
pathways, sidewalks, and street lighting have been reviewed for conformance with
City policies, regulations, and best practices and have been designed with multi-
modal travel in mind; 2) the project site provides opportunities for pedestrian and
bicycle circulation; and 3) the project will provide links to transit oriented systems and
regional trails.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby makes
the following findings and determinations regarding Tentative Map 8437:
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 365
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
4
Tentative Map 8437
A. The proposed Tentative Map 8437 together with the provisions for its design and
improvements is consistent with the intent of applicable subdivision regulations and
related ordinances for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and Dublin Transit Center.
B. The project site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
as it is consistent with the Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning and the adjacent
residential developments.
C. The proposed Tentative Map 8437 is consistent with the intent of applicable
improvements of the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development zoning approved for
Project and therefore consistent with the City of Dublin General Plan and Stage 1
Planned Development Zoning.
D. The proposed Tentative Map 8437 will not result in environmental damage or
substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat or cause public health concerns subject
to existing adopted Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval.
E. The project design will not cause serious public health concerns as it has been
conditioned to comply with all building codes and ordinances in effect at the time of
permit issuance.
F. The design of the project will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large,
or access through or use of property within the proposed project site. The City Engineer
has reviewed the map and title report and has not found any conflicting easements of this
nature
G. The design or improvements of the tentative map are consistent with the City’s General
Plan and the Stage 1 Planned Development Zoning.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council hereby approves the Site
Development Review Permit for Transit Center Site A-3 as shown on plans prepared by BAR
Architects, BKF and Fletcher Studio dated received August 30, 2017, attached as Exhibit A and
subject to the conditions included below.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council hereby approves Tentative
Map 8437 prepared by BKF dated received August 30, 2017, attached as Exhibit A and subject
to the conditions included below.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of
building permits or establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and
approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring
compliance of the conditions of approval. [PL.] Planning, [B] Building, [PO] Police, [PW] Public Works
[P&CS] Parks & Community Services, [ADM] Administration/City Attorney, [FIN] Finance, [F] Alameda
County Fire Department, [DSR] Dublin San Ramon Services District, [CO] Alameda County Department
of Environmental Health, [Z7] Zone 7.
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 366
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
5
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
1. Approval. This Site Development Review and Tentative
Map 8467 approval is for the Transit Center Site A-3 (PLPA-
2017-00036). This approval shall be as generally depicted
and indicated on the project plans prepared by BAR
Architects, BKF, and Fletcher Studio dated received August
30, 2017, attached as Exhibit A, and other plans, text, and
diagrams relating to this Site Development Review, and as
specified as the following Conditions of Approval for this
project. This approval is subject to approval of a companion
Planned Development Zoning (Stage 2).
PL On-going
2. Permit Expiration – Site Development Review. Approval
of this Site Development Review shall be valid until the later
of one (1) year from the effective date, or the term for this
approval established in the Development Agreement, if any,
for the project. This approval shall be null and void in the
event the approved use fails to be established within the
prescribed time. Commencement of the use means the
establishment of use pursuant to the Permit approval or,
demonstrating substantial progress toward commencing such
use. If there is a dispute as to whether the Permit has
expired, the City may hold a noticed public hearing to
determine the matter. Such a determination may be
processed concurrently with revocation proceedings in
appropriate circumstances. If a Permit expires, a new
application must be made and processed according to the
requirements of this Ordinance.
PL One year after
Effective Date
or per terms
outlined in the
DA
3. Permit Expiration – Tentative Map. Approval of the
Tentative Map shall be valid for 36 months from the effective
date as set forth in Section 9.08.130.A of the Dublin
Municipal Code.
PW 36 months after
Effective Date
4. Time Extension. The original approving decision-maker
may, upon the Applicant’s written request for an extension of
approval prior to expiration, upon the determination that all
Conditions of Approval remain adequate and all applicable
findings of approval will continue to be met, grant an
extension of the approval for a period not to exceed six (6)
months. All time extension requests shall be noticed and a
public hearing shall be held before the original hearing body.
PL One Year
Following
Expiration Date
or per terms
outlined in the
DA
5. Compliance. Developer shall comply with the Subdivision
Map Act, the City of Dublin Subdivision and Zoning
Ordinances, City of Dublin Title 7 Public Works Ordinance,
which includes the Grading Ordinance, the City of Dublin
Public Works Standards and Policies, the most current
requirements of the State Code Title 24 and the Americans
with Disabilities Act with regard to accessibility, and all
building and fire codes and ordinances in effect at the time of
building permit issuance. All public improvements
constructed by Developer and to be dedicated to the City are
hereby identified as “public works” under Labor Code section
1771. Accordingly, Developer, in constructing such
improvements, shall comply with the Prevailing Wage Law
(Labor Code. Sects. 1720 and following).
PL, PW On-going
6. Revocation of Permit. The Site Development Review
approval shall be revocable for cause in accordance with
Section 8.96.020.I of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any
PL On-going
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 367
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
6
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
violation of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be
subject to citation.
7. Requirements and Standard Conditions. The Applicant/
Developer shall comply with applicable City of Dublin Fire
Prevention Bureau, Dublin Public Works Department, Dublin
Building Department, Dublin Police Services, Alameda
County Flood Control District Zone 7, Livermore Amador
Valley Transit Authority, Alameda County Public and
Environmental Health, Dublin San Ramon Services District
and the California Department of Health Services
requirements and standard conditions. Prior to issuance of
building permits or the installation of any improvements
related to this project, the Applicant/Developer shall supply
written statements from each such agency or department to
the Planning Department, indicating that all applicable
conditions required have been or will be met.
Various Building Permit
Issuance
8. Required Permits. The Applicant/Developer shall obtain all
permits required by other agencies which may include, but
are not limited to Alameda County Environmental Health,
Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District (Zone 7), California Department of Fish and Wildlife,
Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Caltrans, or other regional/state agencies as required
by law, as applicable. Copies of the permits shall be provided
to the Public Works Department.
PW Building Permit
Issuance
9. Fees. The Applicant/Developer shall pay all applicable fees
in effect at the time of building permit issuance, including, but
not limited to, Planning fees, Building fees, Traffic Impact
Fees, TVTC fees, Dublin San Ramon Services District fees,
Public Facilities fees, Dublin Unified School District School
Impact fees, Fire Facilities Impact fees, Alameda County
Flood and Water Conservation District (Zone 7) Drainage and
Water Connection fees; or any other fee that may be adopted
and applicable, as provided by the Development Agreement,
if any.
Various Building Permit
Issuance
10. Indemnification. The Applicant/Developer shall defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its
agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers,
or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval
of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal board,
Planning Commission, City Council, Community
Development Director, Zoning Administrator, or any other
department, committee, or agency of the City to the extent
such actions are brought within the time period required by
Government Code Section 66499.37 or other applicable law;
provided, however, that the Applicant’s/Developer's duty to
so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless shall be subject to
the City's promptly notifying the Applicant/Developer of any
said claim, action, or proceeding and the City's full
cooperation in the defense of such actions or proceedings.
ADM On-going
11. Clarification of Conditions. In the event that there needs to
be clarification to the Conditions of Approval, the Director of
Community Development and the City Engineer have the
authority to clarify the intent of these Conditions of Approval
PW On-going
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 368
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
7
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
to the Developer without going to a public hearing. The
Director of Community Development and the City Engineer
also have the authority to make minor modifications to these
conditions without going to a public hearing in order for the
Applicant/Developer to fulfill needed improvements or
mitigations resulting from impacts of this project.
12. Clean-up. The Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for
clean-up and disposal of project related trash to maintain a
safe, clean, and litter-free site.
PL On-going
13. Modifications. Modifications or changes to this Site
Development Review approval may be considered by the
Community Development Director in compliance with
Chapter 8.104 of the Zoning Ordinance.
PL On-going
14. Controlling Activities. The Applicant/Developer shall control
all activities on the project site so as not to create a nuisance
to the existing or surrounding businesses and residences.
PL On-going
15. Accessory/Temporary Structures. The use of any
accessory or temporary structures, such as storage sheds or
trailer/containers used for storage or for any other purposes,
shall be subject to review and approval by the Community
Development Director.
PL On-going
PROJECT SPECIFIC
16. Equipment Screening. All electrical, fire risers and/or
mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view.
Any roof-mounted equipment shall be completely screened
from view by materials architecturally compatible with the
building and to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director. The Building Permit plans shall show
the location of all equipment and screening for review and
approval by the Director of Community Development.
PL Building Permit
Issuance
and
Through
Completion/
On-going
17. Colors. The exterior paint colors of the building shall be in
compliance with the Color and Material Board approved with
the project plans. The Applicant shall paint small portions of
the building the approved colors for review and approval by
the Director of Community Development prior to painting the
entire building, whose approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
PL Occupancy
18. Master Sign Program. A Master Sign Program shall be
applied for and approved for all project related signage
including, but not limited to, community identification signage,
address signage, directional signage, parking signage, speed
limit signage, & other signage deemed necessary by the City.
PL Installation of
Signs
19. Development Agreement. To the extent it remains in effect,
the Applicant/Developer shall comply with all applicable
sections of the Master Development Agreement for the
Dublin Transit Center adopted as Ordinance No. 5-03.
PL Building Permit
Issuance
20. Affordable Housing Agreement. The Applicant/Developer
shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the
City to ensure that the affordable units described below
remain affordable for 55 years and that other provisions of
Chapter 8.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code (Inclusionary
Zoning Regulations) are satisfied. The agreement shall also
include provisions to ensure that the units remain affordable
in the event that the affordable units are sold as
ADM, PL Building Permit
Issuance
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 369
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
8
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
condominium units. Such agreement shall be recorded to
ensure it has priority over and is not subordinate to any other
recorded document affecting the property.
21. Inclusionary Zoning Requirements. The
Applicant/Developer shall provide a minimum of 10%
moderate income units. Unit affordability shall be between
80% and 120% of the area median income. Affordable unit
types (i.e. 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, 3 bedroom, etc.) shall be
equally dispersed with the same ratio as the market rate units
in accordance with the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations. Any
changes to the affordable units must first be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Director.
PL Through
Completion &
On-going
22. Mitigation Monitoring Program. The Applicant/Developer
shall comply with the Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation
Monitoring Program including all mitigation measures, action
programs, and implementation measures on file with the
Community Development Department.
PL Dublin Transit
Center EIR
Mitigation
Monitoring
Program
23. Sound Attenuation. The Applicant/Developer shall submit a
site specific acoustic report to be prepared by a qualified
acoustical consultant. The acoustic report shall include
detailed identification of noise exposure levels on the
individual project site and a listing of specific measures to
reduce both interior and exterior noise levels to normally
acceptable levels including but not limited to glazing and
ventilation systems, construction of noise barriers and use of
buildings to shield noise.
PL Building Permit
Issuance
24. Final building and site development plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Community Development
Department staff prior to the issuance of a building permit.
All such plans shall insure:
a. That standard residential security requirements as
established by the Dublin Police Department are
provided.
b. That ramps, special parking spaces, signing, and other
appropriate physical features for the disabled, are
provided throughout the site for all publicly used
facilities.
c. That exterior lighting of the building and site is not
directed onto adjacent properties and the light source is
shielded from direct offsite viewing.
d. That all mechanical equipment, including air conditioning
condensers, electrical and gas meters, are
architecturally screened from view, and that electrical
transformers are either underground or architecturally
screened.
e. That all vents, gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc., are
painted to match the color of adjacent surface.
f. That all materials and colors are to be as approved by
the Dublin Community Development Department. Once
constructed or installed, all improvements are to be
maintained in accordance with the approved plans. Any
PL Building Permit
Issuance
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 370
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
9
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
changes, which affect the exterior character, shall be
resubmitted to the Dublin Community Development
Department for approval.
g. That all exterior architectural elements not detailed on
the plans be finished in a style and in materials in
harmony with the exterior of the building. All materials
shall wrap to the inside corners and terminate at a
perpendicular wall plane.
h. That all other public agencies that require review of the
project are supplied with copies of the final building and
site plans and that compliance is obtained with at least
their minimum Code requirements.
25. Parking Structure. The parking structure shall be secure
and controlled by electronically controlled gates. The parking
structure shall be well lit, with the ceiling painted white to
enhance brightness. Blind corners in the parking structure
shall be provided with shatterproof convex mirrors to improve
visibility for both operators of vehicles and pedestrians.
PL, PO Occupancy &
On-going
LANDSCAPING
26. Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans. Final landscape
plans, irrigation system plans, tree preservation techniques,
and guarantees, shall be reviewed and approved by the
Dublin Planning Division prior to the issuance of the building
permit. All such submittals shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Engineer and the Community Development
Director. Plans shall be generally consistent with the
Preliminary Landscape drawings included in the Project Plan
Set prepared by Fletcher Studio received by the Planning
Division on August 30, 2017, except as modified by the
Conditions listed below or as required by the Community
Development Director to address specific site constraints or
conditions. The Final Landscape Plans shall insure:
a. That plant material is utilized which will be capable of
healthy growth within the given range of soil and climate.
b. That proposed landscape screening is of a height and
density so that it provides a positive visual impact within
three years from the time of planting.
c. That unless unusual circumstances prevail, all trees on
the site shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in size. All
trees that are on the exterior building perimeter shall be
24” box minimum, with at least 30% at 36” box or
greater. All shrubs shall be 5 gallon minimum.
d. That a plan for an automatic irrigation system be
provided which assures that all plants get adequate
water. In unusual circumstances, and if approved by
Staff, a manual or quick coupler system may be used.
e. That concrete curbing is to be used at the edges of all
planters and paving surfaces where applicable.
f. That all cut and fill slopes conform to the conditions
detailed in the Site Development Review packet.
PL Landscape plan
approval and
installation
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 371
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
10
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
g. That a guarantee from the owners or contractors shall be
required guaranteeing all shrubs and ground cover, all
trees, and the irrigation system for one year.
h. That a permanent maintenance agreement on all
landscaping will be required from the owner insuring
regular irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement, if
applicable.
27. Landscaping at Street/Drive Aisle Intersections.
Landscaping shall not obstruct the sight distance of
motorists, pedestrians or bicyclists. Except for trees,
landscaping (and/or landscape structures such as walls) at
drive aisle intersections shall not be taller than 30 inches
above the curb. Landscaping shall be kept at a minimum
height and fullness giving patrol officers and the general
public surveillance capabilities of the area.
PL Ongoing
28. Plant Clearances. All trees planted shall meet the following
clearances:
a. 6’ from the face of building walls or roof eaves.
b. 7’ from fire hydrants, storm drains, sanitary sewers and/or
gas lines.
c. 5’ from top of wing of driveways, mailboxes, water,
telephone and/or electrical mains
d. 15’ from stop signs, street or curb sign returns.
e. 15’ from either side of street lights.
PL Landscape plan
approval and
installation
29. Landscaping. Applicant/Developer shall construct all
landscaping within the site and along the project frontage.
PL, PW Landscape plan
approval and
installation
30. Backflow Prevention Devices. The Landscape Plan shall
show the location of all backflow prevention devises. The
location and screening of the backflow prevention devices
shall be reviewed and approved by City staff.
PL, PW, F Landscape plan
approval and
installation
31. Root Barriers and Tree Staking. The landscape plans shall
provide details showing root barriers and tree staking will be
installed which meet current City specifications.
PL, PW Landscape plan
approval and
installation
32. Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The Applicant/
Developer shall submit written documentation to the Public
Works Department (in the form of a Landscape
Documentation Package and other required documents) that
the development conforms to the City’s Water Efficient
Landscaping Ordinance.
PL Landscape plan
approval and
installation
BUILDING – PROJECT SPECIFIC
33. Building Codes and Ordinances. All project construction
shall conform to all building codes and ordinances in effect at
the time of building permit.
B Through
Completion
34. Phased Occupancy Plan. If occupancy is requested to
occur in phases, then all physical improvements within each
phase shall be required to be completed prior to occupancy
of any unit within that phase except for items specifically
excluded in an approved Phased Occupancy Plan, or minor
handwork items, approved by the Department of Community
Development. The Phased Occupancy Plan shall be
submitted to the Directors of Community Development and
Public Works for review and approval a minimum of 60 days
prior to the request for any occupancy the building. No
B Occupancy of
any affected
building
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 372
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
11
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
individual space shall be occupied until the adjoining area is
finished, safe, accessible, and provided with all reasonable
expected services and amenities, and separated from
remaining additional construction activity. Subject to
approval of the Director of Community Development, the
completion of landscaping may be deferred due to inclement
weather with the posting of a bond for the value of the
deferred landscaping and associated improvements.
35. Building Permits. To apply for building permits,
Applicant/Developer shall submit electronic plans and specs
and the number of hard copies as determined by the Building
Official for plan check. Each set of plans shall have attached
an annotated copy of these Conditions of Approval. The
notations shall clearly indicate how all Conditions of Approval
will be or have been complied with. Construction plans will
not be accepted without the annotated resolutions attached
to each set of plans. Applicant/Developer will be responsible
for obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City
agencies prior to the issuance of building permits.
B Building Permit
Issuance
36. Construction Drawings. Construction plans shall be fully
dimensioned (including building elevations) accurately drawn
(depicting all existing and proposed conditions on site), and
prepared and signed by a California licensed Architect or
Engineer. All structural calculations shall be prepared and
signed by a California licensed Architect or Engineer. The
site plan, landscape plan and details shall be consistent with
each other.
B Building Permit
Issuance
37. Air Conditioning Units. Air conditioning units and
ventilation ducts shall be screened from public view with
materials compatible to the main building. Units shall be
permanently installed on concrete pads or other non-movable
materials approved by the Chief Building Official and Director
of Community Development. Air conditioning units shall be
located in accordance with the PD text.
B Occupancy
38. Temporary Fencing. Temporary Construction fencing shall
be installed along the perimeter of all work under
construction.
B Through
Completion
39. Addressing
a. Provide a site plan with the City of Dublin’s address grid
overlaid on the plans (1” to 30’ scale). Highlight all
exterior door openings on plans (front, rear, garage, etc.).
3 copies on full size sheets and 3 copies reduced sheets.
(Prior to release of addresses)
b. Provide plan for display of addresses. The Building
Official shall approve plan prior to issuance of the building
permit. (Prior to permitting)
c. Provide floor plans detailing each unit for addressing to
the Building Official. The Applicant/Developer has the
option of providing apartment number layout at the time of
submittal. 3 copies on full size sheets and 3 copies
reduced sheets. If the Applicant/Developer provides a
draft of the apartment numbers, the copies shall include
the draft and blank pages. (Prior to permitting)
d. Address signage shall be provided as per the Dublin
B Various
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 373
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
12
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
Residential Security Code. (Occupancy of any Unit)
e. Exterior address numbers shall be backlit and be posted
in such a way that they may be seen from the street.
(Prior to occupancy)
40. Engineer Observation. The Engineer of record shall be
retained to provide observation services for all components of
the lateral and vertical design of the building, including
nailing, hold-downs, straps, shear, roof diaphragm and
structural frame of building. A written report shall be
submitted to the City Inspector prior to scheduling the final
frame inspection.
B Scheduling the
Final Frame
Inspection
41. Foundation. Geotechnical Engineer for the soils report shall
review and approve the foundation design. A letter shall be
submitted to the Building Division on the approval.
B Building Permit
Issuance
42. Green Building.
Green Building measures as detailed in the SDR package
may be adjusted prior to master plan check application
submittal with prior approval from the City’s Green Building
Official provided that the design of the project complies with
the City of Dublin’s Green Building Ordinance and State Law
as applicable. In addition, all changes shall be reflected in
the Master Plans. (Through Completion)
The Green Building checklist shall be included in the master
plans. The checklist shall detail what Green Points are being
obtained and where the information is found within the
master plans. (Prior to first permit).
Prior to final, the project shall submit a completed checklist
with appropriate verification that all Green Points required by
7.94 of the Dublin Municipal Code have been incorporated.
(Through Completion)
Developer may choose self-certification or certification by a
third party as permitted by the Dublin Municipal Code.
Applicant shall inform the Green Building Official of method of
certification prior to release of the first permit in each
subdivision / neighborhood.
B Various
43. Copies of Approved Plans. Applicant shall provide City with
2 reduced (1/2 size) copies of the City of Dublin stamped
approved plan.
B 30 days after
permit & each
revision
issuance
44. Cool Roofs. Flat roof areas shall have their roofing material
coated with light colored gravel or painted with light colored
or reflective material designed for Cool Roofs.
B Through
Completion
45. Solar Zone – CA Energy Code. Show the location of the
Solar Zone on the site plan. Detail the orientation of the
Solar Zone. This information shall be shown in the master
plan check on the overall site plan. This condition of
approval will be waived if the project meets the exceptions
provided in the CA Energy Code.
B Through
Completion
46. Accessible Parking. The required number of parking stalls,
the design and location of the accessible parking stalls shall
be as required by the CA Building Code.
B Through
Completion
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 374
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
13
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
47. Emergency Access
Vehicle Gates. Private roads and parking areas or structures
controlled by unmanned mechanical parking type gates shall
be provided with police emergency access by Opticom LED
Emitter and providing the gate access code for distribution to
Emergency responders.
The control box for the code device shall be mounted on a
control pedestal consisting of a metal post/pipe, which shall
be installed at a height of 36 to 42 inches to the center of the
keypad and a minimum of 15 feet (4.6m) from the entry / exit
gate. It shall be located on the driver’s side of the road or
driveway and accessible in such a manner as to not require a
person to exit their vehicle to reach it, nor to drive on the
wrong side of the road or driveway, not to require any back-
up movements in order to enter / exit the gate.
The gates accesses devices shall be designed and installed
to allow for entry through the vehicular gate under three
different and unique situations:
a. The system in services and under normal operations.
b. A power failure has occurred and battery powered
convenience open systems are employed.
c. A power failure has occurred and the convenience
open system has failed (dead or low charged battery).
B Prior to
Occupancy an d
through the life
of the project
48. 60-Foot No Build Covenant. Pursuant to Dublin Municipal
Code Section 7.32.130, the owner shall file with the Building
Official a Covenant and Agreement Regarding Maintenance
of Yards for an Oversized Building binding such owner, his
heirs, and assignees, to set aside a 60-foot required yard as
unobstructed space having no improvements. After
execution by the owner and Building Official, such covenant
shall be recorded in the Alameda County Recorder’s Office,
and shall continue in effect so long as an oversized building
remains or unless otherwise released by authority of the
Building Official.
B Permitting
49. Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Requirement.
Installation of an emergency responder radio coverage
equipment shall be determined by the Fire Code Official and
the Chief of Police. If installation of equipment is required,
the equipment shall be operation prior to any occupancy.
B, PO, F First Occupancy
FIRE
50. Fire Apparatus Roadways. Fire apparatus roadways shall
have a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet and an
unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6
inches. Roadways under 36 feet wide shall be posted with
signs or shall have red curbs painted with labels on one side;
roadways under 28 feet wide shall be posted with signs or
shall have red curbs painted with labels on both sides of the
street as follows: “NO STOPPING FIRE LANE - CVC
22500.1”.
F Occupancy
51. Gate Approvals. Fencing and gates that cross pedestrian
access and exit paths as well as vehicle entrance and exit
roads need to be approved for fire department access and
F Building Permit
Issuance & On-
going
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 375
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
14
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
egress as well as exiting provisions where such is applicable.
Plans need to be submitted that clearly show the fencing and
gates and details of such. This should be clearly incorporated
as part of the site plan with details provided as necessary.
Automatic Gates. All electrically controlled gates shall be
provided with an emergency gate over-ride key switch for fire
department access.
Provide Public Safety radio repeater in parking garage.
52. b Key Box / Switch Order Information. A Fire Department
Key Box shall be installed at the main entrance to the
Building. Note these locations on the plans. The key box
should be installed approximately 5 1/2 feet above grade.
The box shall be sized to hold the master key to the facility as
well as keys for rooms not accessible by the master key.
Key boxes and switches may be ordered directly from the
Knox Company at www.knoxbox.com
F Occupancy
53. Fire Alarm (detection) System Required. A Fire Alarm-
Detection System shall be installed throughout the building
so as to provide full property protection, including
combustible concealed spaces, as required by NFPA 72. The
system shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 72, CA
Fire, Building, Electrical, and Mechanical Codes.
If the system is intended to serve as an evacuation system,
compliance with the horn/strobe requirements for the entire
building must also be met. All automatic fire extinguishing
systems shall be interconnected to the fire alarm system so
as to activate an alarm if activated and to monitor control
valves. Delayed egress locks shall meet requirements of C.F.
F Occupancy
54. New Fire Sprinkler System & Monitoring Requirements.
In accordance with the Dublin Fire Code, fire sprinklers shall
be installed in the building. The system shall be in
accordance with the NFPA 13, the CA Fire Code and CA
Building Code. Plans and specifications showing detailed
mechanical design, cut sheets, listing sheets and hydraulic
calculations shall be submitted to the Fire Department for
approval and permit prior to installation. Compliance with 2016
CFC section 905 for Standpipe and Section 913 for Fire
Pumps are required.
F Occupancy
55. Fire Extinguishers. Extinguishers shall be visible and
unobstructed. Signage shall be provided to indicate fire
extinguisher locations. The number and location of
extinguishers shall be shown on the plans.
F Building Permit
Issuance &
Occupancy
56. Site Plan. The site plan needs to show sufficient detail to
reflect an accurate and detailed layout of the site for review
and record purposes. The site plan will need a scale that will
allow sufficient details for review purposes and include, but
not be limited to the following:
a. The site parking and circulation layout including
fences, gates, fire lane locations and turnarounds.
F Building Permit
Issuance
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 376
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
15
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
b. Location of all fire appliances including fire hydrants,
fire connections, fire sprinkler risers, and fire control
valves.
c. The location of all building openings including the exit
discharge pathway for building exits. Note the location
of exit lighting for these pathways as well.
d. The location of any overhead obstructions and their
clearances
e. The location of property lines and assumed property
lines between buildings on the same property as well
as any easements.
The site plan will also need to note the location and distance
of fire hydrants that are along the property frontage as well as
the closest hydrants to each side of the property that are
located along the access roads that serves the property. In
addition, the improved face of curb to face of curb or edge of
pavement width of the access road that serves the property
will need to be noted.
57. Fire Access. Fire access is required to be approved all-
weather access. Show on the plans the location of the all-
weather access and a description of the construction. Access
road must be designed to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus.
F Building Permit
Issuance &
Occupancy
58. Hydrants & Fire Flows. Show the location of any on-site fire
hydrants and any fire hydrants that are along the property
frontage as well as the closest hydrants to each side of the
property that are located along the access roads that serves
this property. Provide a letter from the Dublin San Ramon
Services District indicating what the available fire flow is to
this property.
F Building Permit
Issuance
59. Addressing. Addressing shall be illuminated or in an
illuminated area. The address characters shall be contrasting
to their background. If address is placed on glass, the
numbers shall be on the exterior of the glass and a
contrasting background placed behind the numbers.
F Occupancy
60. Building Address. The building shall be provided with all
addresses or the assigned address range so as to be clearly
visible from either direction of travel on the street the address
references. The address characters shall not be less than 5
inches in height by 1-inch stroke. Larger sizes may be
necessary depending on the setbacks and visibility.
F Occupancy &
On-going
61. Fire Service Access Elevator. At least one elevator shall
comply with size and weight requirements in 2016 CBC
Chapter 30 and 2016 CFC section 607.
F Occupancy &
On-going
62. Automatic Shutoffs For Ducts. Air moving systems
supplying air in excess of 2,000 cubic feet per minute to
enclosed spaces within buildings shall be equipped with an
automatic shutoff. Automatic shutoff shall be accomplished
by interrupting the power source of the air moving equipment
upon detection of smoke in the main supply air duct served
by such equipment. Smoke detectors shall be labeled by an
approved agency approved and listed by California State Fire
Marshal for air duct installation and shall be installed in
F Occupancy
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 377
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
16
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
accordance with the manufacturer’s approved installation
instructions.
Duct detectors shall be accessible for cleaning by providing
access doors.
Duct detector location shall be permanently and clearly
identified.
63. Stationary Storage Battery Systems. Stationary storage
battery systems having an electrolyte capacity of more than
50 gallons for flooded lead acid, nickel cadmium and valve-
regulated lead acid, or 1,000 pounds for lithium-ion, used for
facility standby power, emergency power or uninterrupted
power supplies, shall comply with this section.
a. VRLA battery systems shall be provided with a listed
device or other approved method to preclude, detect
and control thermal runaway.
b. An approved method and materials for the control and
neutralization of a spill of electrolyte shall be provided
in areas containing lead acid, nickel-cadmium or other
types of batteries with free-flowing liquid electrolyte.
c. Ventilation of stationary storage battery systems shall
comply with the California Mechanical Code as
cabinet and room rate required per cubic foot per
minute.
d. Equipment room and building signage shall be
provided indicating that the room has energized
battery systems or circuits and that corrosive liquids
are present.
e. Cabinets shall have exterior labels that identify the
manufacturer and model number of the system and
electrical rating of the contained battery system.
f. The battery systems shall be seismically braced in
accordance with the California Building Code.
g. An approved automatic smoke detection system shall
be installed in accordance with CFC section in rooms
containing stationary battery systems.
F Occupancy &
On-going
64. Generators.
a. Stationary generators for emergency and standby
power systems shall be listed in accordance with UL
2200.
b. Generators shall be installed according to Article of
the California Electrical Code.
c. Portable and vehicle mounted generators shall be
bonded and grounded in accord with Article of the
California Electrical Code.
d. Code required Standby Power Systems shall be
according to the California Electrical Code.
e. Non-code required optional standby power systems
shall be according to Article 702 of the California
Electrical Code.
f. Life safety branch circuits shall be in accordance with
F Occupancy &
On-going
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 378
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
17
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
Article of the California Electrical Code.
g. All electrical wiring, devices, appliances and other
equipment shall be in accord with the California
Electrical Code.
65. Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition.
a. Clearance to combustibles from temporary heating
devices shall be maintained. Devices shall be fixed in
place and protected from damage, dislodgement or
overturning in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions.
b. Smoking shall be prohibited except in approved
areas. Signs shall be posted “NO SMOKING” in a
conspicuous location in each structure or location in
which smoking is prohibited.
c. Combustible debris, rubbish and waste material shall
be removed from buildings at the end of each shift of
work.
d. Flammable and combustible liquid storage areas shall
be maintained clear of combustible vegetation and
waste materials.
F During
Construction
PUBLIC WORKS – GENERAL CONDITIONS
66. Conditions of Approval. Developer shall comply with the
City of Dublin Public Works Standard Conditions of Approval
contained below (“Standard Condition”) unless specifically
modified by Project Specific Conditions of Approval below.
PW On-going
67. Zone 7 Impervious Surface Fees. The Applicant shall
complete a “Zone 7 Impervious Surface Fee Application” and
submit an accompanying exhibit for review by the Public
Works Department. Fees generated by this application will
be due at issuance of Building Permit.
PW Building Permit
Issuance
PUBLIC WORKS – AGREEMENTS & BONDS
68. Tract Improvement Agreement. Developer shall enter into
an Improvement Agreement with the City for all public
improvements including any required offsite storm drainage
or roadway improvements that are needed to serve the
development, as determined by the City Engineer.
PW
Final Map
Approval or
Grading Permit
Issuance
69. Security. Developer shall provide faithful performance
security to guarantee the improvements, as determined by
the City Engineer (Note: The performance security shall
remain in effect until one year after final inspection).
PW
Final Map
Approval or
Grading Permit
Issuance
70. O&M Agreement. The requirements of Provision C.3 of the
Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order No.
R2-2015-0049, require the property owner to enter into an
Agreement with the City of Dublin to provide verification and
assurance that all treatment devices will be properly operated
and maintained and to guarantee the owner’s perpetual
maintenance obligation for all storm drain inlet filters installed
as part of the project. The Agreement shall be recorded
against the property and shall run with the land.
PW Final Map
Approval
PUBLIC WORKS - PERMITS
71. Encroachment Permit. Developer shall obtain an
Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for
all construction activity within the public right-of-way of any
PW Start of Work
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 379
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
18
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
street where the City has accepted the street right of way.
The encroachment permit may require surety for slurry seal
and restriping. At the discretion of the City Engineer an
encroachment permit for work specifically included in an
Improvement Agreement may not be required.
72. Grading Permit. Developer shall obtain a Grading Permit
from the Public Works Department for all grading. PW Start of Work
PUBLIC WORKS – SUBMITTALS
73. Plan Submittals. All submittals of plans shall comply with the
requirements of the “City of Dublin Public Works Department
Improvement Plan Submittal Requirements”, the “City of
Dublin Improvement Plan Review Check List,” and current
Public Works and industry standards. A complete submittal
of improvement plans shall include all civil improvements,
joint trench, street lighting and on-site safety lighting,
landscape plans, and all associated documents as required.
The Developer shall not piecemeal the submittal by
submitting various components separately.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
74. Submittals to non-City Agencies. Developer will be
responsible for submittals and reviews to obtain the
approvals of all participating non-City agencies. The Alameda
County Fire Department and the Dublin San Ramon Services
District shall approve and sign the Improvement Plans.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
75. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs). A
Homeowners Association(s) shall be formed by recordation
of a declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions to
govern use and maintenance of common areas and facilities.
Said declaration shall set forth the Association name, bylaws,
rules and regulations. The CC&Rs shall also contain a
provision that prohibits the amendment of those provisions of
the CC&Rs without City’s approval. The CC&Rs shall ensure
that there is adequate provision for maintenance, in good
repair and on a regular basis, the landscaping & irrigation,
decorative pavements, fences, walls, drainage, lighting,
signs, building exteriors, parking areas and other related
improvements. The Developer shall submit a copy of the
CC&R document to the City for review and approval relative
to these conditions of approval.
PL, PW Final Map
Approval
76. Geotechnical Report. Developer shall submit a Design
Level Geotechnical Report, which includes street pavement
sections and grading recommendations.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans, and
Grading Plans
77. Ownership and Maintenance of Improvements. Applicant
shall submit an Ownership and Maintenance Exhibit for
review and approval by Planning Division and Public Works
Department. Maintenance shall include but not be limited to,
street cleaning of parking areas within Campbell Lane along
project frontage. Terms of maintenance are subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer.
PL, PW
Final Map
Approval or
Grading Permit
Issuance
78. Approved Plan Files. Developer shall provide the Public
Works Department a PDF format file of approved site plans,
including grading, improvement, landscaping & irrigation, joint
trench and lighting.
PW Approval of Site
Plans
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 380
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
19
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
79. Master Files. Developer shall provide the Public Works
Department a digital vectorized file of the “master” files for
the project, in a format acceptable to the City Engineer.
Digital raster copies are not acceptable. The digital
vectorized files shall be in AutoCAD 14 or higher drawing
format. All objects and entities in layers shall be colored by
layer and named in English. All submitted drawings shall use
the Global Coordinate System of USA, California, NAD 83
California State Plane, Zone III, and U.S. foot.
PW Acceptance of
Improvements
PUBLIC WORKS – EASEMENTS AND ACCESS RIGHTS
80. Abandonment of Easements. Developer shall obtain
abandonment from all applicable public agencies of existing
easements and rights of way within the development that will
no longer be used.
PW
Final Map
Approval or
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
81. Acquisition of Easements. Developer shall acquire
easements, and/or obtain rights-of-entry from the adjacent
property owners for any improvements not located on their
property. The easements and/or rights-of-entry shall be in
writing and copies furnished to the Public Works Department.
PW
Final Map
Approval or
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
PUBLIC WORKS - GRADING
82. Grading Plan. The Grading Plan shall be in conformance
with the recommendation of the Geotechnical Report, the
approved Tentative Map and Site Development Review, and
the City design standards & ordinances. In case of conflict
between the soil engineer’s recommendation and the City
ordinances, the City Engineer shall determine which shall
apply.
PW Approval of
Grading Plans
83. Erosion Control Plan. A detailed Erosion and Sediment
Control Plan shall be included with the Grading Plan
submittal. The plan shall include detailed design, location,
and maintenance criteria of all erosion and sedimentation
control measures.
PW Issuance of
Grading Permit
84. Retaining Walls. Tiebacks or structural fabric for retaining
walls shall not cross property lines, or shall be located a
minimum of 2’ below the finished grade of the upper lot.
PW Approval of
Grading Plans
PUBLIC WORKS - IMPROVEMENTS
85. Public Improvements. The public improvements shall be
constructed generally as shown on the Tentative Map and
Site Development Review. However, the approval of the
Tentative Map and Site Development Review is not an
approval of the specific design of the drainage, sanitary
sewer, water, traffic circulation, parking, stormwater
treatment, sidewalks and street improvements.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
86. Public Improvement Conformance. All public
improvements shall conform to the City of Dublin Standard
Plans, current practices, and design requirements and as
approved by the City Engineer.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
87. Public Street Slopes. Public streets shall be a minimum 1%
slope with minimum gutter flow of 0.7% around bumpouts.
Private streets and alleys shall be a minimum 0.5% slope.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
88. Curb Returns. Curb Returns on arterial and collector streets
shall be 40-foot radius, all internal public streets curb returns PW Approval of
Improvement
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 381
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
20
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
shall be minimum 30-foot radius (36-foot with bump outs) and
private streets/alleys shall be a minimum 20-foot radius, or as
approved by the City Engineer. Curb ramp locations and
design shall conform to the most current Title 24 and
Americans with Disabilities Act requirements and as
approved by the Public Works Traffic Engineer.
Plans
89. Decorative Pavement. Any decorative pavers/paving
installed within City right-of-way shall be done to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Where decorative paving is
installed at signalized intersections, pre-formed traffic signal
loops shall be put under the decorative pavement. Decorative
pavements shall not interfere with placement of traffic control
devices, including pavement markings. All turn lane stripes,
stop bars & crosswalks shall be delineated with concrete
bands or color pavers to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Maintenance costs of the decorative paving shall be the
responsibility of the developer or future property owner.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
90. Traffic Signing and Striping. Developer shall install all
traffic signage, striping, and pavement markings as required
by the Public Works Department.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
91. Street Lighting. Street light standards and luminaries shall
be designed and installed or relocated as determined by the
City Engineer. The maximum voltage drop for streetlights is
5%.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
92. Water and Sewer Facilities. Developer shall construct all
potable and recycled water and sanitary sewer facilities
required to serve the project in accordance with DSRSD
master plans, standards, specifications and requirements.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
93. Fire Hydrants. Fire hydrant locations shall be approved by
the Alameda County Fire Department. A raised reflector blue
traffic marker shall be installed in the street opposite each
hydrant.
PW
Approval of
Grading/Improv
ement Plans
94. Storm Drain Inlet Markers. All on-site storm drain inlets
must be marked with storm drain markers that read: “No
dumping, drains to creek.” The stencils may be purchased
from the Public Work Department.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
95. Utilities. Developer shall construct gas, electric, telephone,
cable TV, and communication improvements within the
fronting streets and as necessary to serve the project and the
future adjacent parcels as approved by the City Engineer and
the various Public Utility agencies.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
96. Utility Locations. All electric, telephone, cable TV, and
communications utilities, shall be placed underground in
accordance with the City policies and ordinances. All utilities
shall be located and provided within public utility easements
or public services easements and sized to meet utility
company standards.
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
97. Utility Vaults and Boxes. All utility vaults, boxes, and
structures, unless specifically approved otherwise by the City
Engineer, shall be underground and placed in landscaped
areas and screened from public view. Prior to Joint Trench
Plan approval, landscape drawings shall be submitted to the
City showing the location of all utility vaults, boxes, and
PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 382
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
21
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
structures and adjacent landscape features and plantings.
The Joint Trench Plans shall be signed by the City Engineer
prior to construction of the joint trench improvements.
98. Street Signs. Developer shall furnish and install street name
signs, traffic signs and markings for the project as required by
the City Engineer.
PUBLIC WORKS - CONSTRUCTION
99. Erosion Control Implementation. The Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan shall be implemented between
October 1st and April 30th unless otherwise allowed in writing
by the City Engineer. The Developer will be responsible for
maintaining erosion and sediment control measures for one
year following the City’s acceptance of the improvements.
PW On-going as
needed
100. Archaeological Finds. If archaeological materials are
encountered during construction, construction within 100 feet
of these materials shall be halted until a professional
Archaeologist who is certified by the Society of California
Archaeology (SCA) or the Society of Professional
Archaeology (SOPA) has had an opportunity to evaluate the
significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation
measures.
PW On-going as
needed
101. Construction Activities. Construction activities, including
the idling, maintenance, and warming up of equipment, shall
be limited to Monday through Friday, and non-City holidays,
between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. except as
otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Extended hours or
Saturday work will be considered by the City Engineer on a
case-by-case basis. To request Saturday work, Owner shall
submit the request to City Engineer by 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time
Tuesday and receive a response by 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time
on Thursday. Note that the construction hours of operation
within the public right of way are more restrictive.
PW On-going as
needed
102. Temporary Fencing. Temporary Construction fencing shall
be installed along the perimeter of all work under construction
to separate the construction operation from the public. All
construction activities shall be confined within the fenced
area. Construction materials and/or equipment shall not be
operated or stored outside of the fenced area or within the
public right-of-way unless approved in advance by the City
Engineer.
PW
Start of
Construction
and On-going
103. Construction Noise Management Plan. Developer shall
prepare a construction noise management plan that identifies
measures to be taken to minimize construction noise on
surrounding developed properties. The plan shall include
hours of construction operation, use of mufflers on
construction equipment, speed limit for construction traffic,
haul routes and identify a noise monitor. Specific noise
management measures shall be provided prior to project
construction.
PW
Start of
Construction
Implementation,
and On-going
as needed
104. Traffic Control Plan. Closing of any existing pedestrian
pathway and/or sidewalk during construction shall be
implemented through a City approved Traffic Control Plan
and shall be done with the goal of minimizing the impact on
pedestrian circulation.
PW
Start of
Construction
and On-going
as needed
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 383
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
22
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
105. Construction Traffic Interface Plan. Developer shall
prepare a plan for construction traffic interface with public
traffic on any existing public street. Construction traffic and
parking may be subject to specific requirements by the City
Engineer.
PW
Start of
Construction;
Implementation,
and On-going
as needed
106. Pest Control. Developer shall be responsible for controlling
any rodent, mosquito, or other pest problem due to
construction activities.
PW On-going
107. Dust Control Measures. Developer shall be responsible for
watering or other dust-palliative measures to control dust as
conditions warrant or as directed by the City Engineer.
PW
Start of
Construction;
Implementation
On-going as
needed
108. Construction Traffic and Parking. All construction related
parking shall be off street in an area provided by the
Developer and will be in the garage of the structure once the
podium concrete is complete. Construction traffic and
parking shall be provided in a manner approved by the City
Engineer to minimize impact on BART patrons.
PW On-going
PUBLIC WORKS – NPDES
109. Stormwater Treatment. The project qualifies as a Category
C Special Project – Transit-Oriented Development as defined
in the NPDES Municipal Regional Permit (MRP) with a
maximum Low Impact Development (LID) treatment
reduction credit of ninety percent (90%). The project shall
treat a minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total project
impervious area with LID treatment measures as defined in
the MRP. Planting within all bioretention areas or similar LID
landscape-based stormwater treatment measures shall
adhere to the guidelines summarized in the most current
version of Appendix B to the C.3 Stormwater Technical
Guidance Handbook published by the Alameda County Clean
Water Program.
PW
Building Permit
Issuance and
Grading Permit
Issuance
110. Media Filters. All media filters used for stormwater
treatment shall have been certified under the Washington
State Department of Ecology Technical Assessment Protocol
– Ecology (TAPE) General Use Level Designation (GULD) for
Basic Treatment. All media filters shall be hydraulically sized
based on the criteria specified in the Municipal Regional
Permit Provision C.3.d and the design operation rate for
which the product received TAPE GULD certification for
Basic Treatment.
PW
Building Permit
Issuance and
Grading Permit
Issuance
111. NOI and SWPPP. Prior to any clearing or grading,
Developer shall provide the City evidence that a Notice of
Intent (NOI) has been sent to the California State Water
Resources Control Board per the requirements of the NPDES
Permit. A copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) shall be provided to the Public Works Department
and be kept at the construction site.
PW
Start of Any
Construction
Activities
112. SWPPP. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) shall identify the Best Management Practices
(BMPs) appropriate to the project construction activities. The
SWPPP shall include the erosion and sediment control
measures in accordance with the regulations outlined in the
PW
SWPPP to be
Prepared Prior
to Approval of
Improvement
Plans;
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 384
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
23
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
most current version of the ABAG Erosion and Sediment
Control Handbook or State Construction Best Management
Practices Handbook. The Developer is responsible for
ensuring that all contractors implement all storm water
pollution prevention measures in the SWPPP.
Implementation
Prior to Start of
Construction
and On-going
as needed
113. Stormwater Management Plan. Construction Plans shall
include a Stormwater Management Plan subject to review
and approval of the City Engineer.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans and
Building Permit
Issuance
114. Trash Capture. Specific information is required on the
construction plan set demonstrating how MRP Provision C.10
(trash capture) requirements are met. Trash capture devices
to be used shall be listed and details shown on plans.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans and
Building Permit
Issuance
PUBLIC WORKS – SPECIAL CONDITIONS
115. Approval. The Tentative Map approval for Tract 8437, for
Condominium Purposes, PLPA 2017-00036, establishes the
design concepts and expectations for the Tentative Tract
Map. The Tentative Tract Map shall generally conform to the
SDR and Tentative Map plans submitted by BKF Engineers,
submitted August 30, 2017, on file with the Community
Development Department, and other plans, text, and
diagrams relating to this Tentative Tract Map, unless
modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein.
PL, PW
On-going
116. Final Map Recordation. Final Map 8437 shall record prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
PW Building Permit
Issuance
117. Wells or Exploratory Boring. Any water well, cathodic
protection well, or exploratory boring on the project property
must be properly abandoned, backfilled, or maintained in
accordance with applicable groundwater protection
ordinances. For additional information contact Alameda
County Flood Control, Zone 7.
PW Through
Completion
118. Stormwater Requirements Checklist. Applicant shall
submit an updated “Stormwater Requirements Checklist” and
accompanying required documentation.
PW Approval of
Grading Plans
119. Sidewalks. All public sidewalks must be within City right-of-
way or in a pedestrian access easement unless approved by
the City Engineer.
PW Final Map
Approval or
Issuance of
Grading Permit
120. Ownership of Campbell Lane Public Right-of-way.
Applicant shall accept ownership of a portion of Campbell
Lane public right-of-way, as generally shown on the exhibit
submitted to the Community Development Department on
October 2, 2017, to the property owner, reserving a public
access easement and utility easement over the area and
allowing for public and utility agencies to continue their
current use of the street right-of-way. The exact dimensions
and location of this portion of land and the terms of the
quitclaim deed and easement shall be as reasonably agreed
upon by the City and the Applicant. Applicant shall cooperate
in the preparation of all necessary documentation to process
and effectuate the property transfer and easement
PW
Building Permit
Issuance or
Approval of
Grading Plans
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 385
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
24
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
dedication. The Applicant shall construct a physical
improvement at street level delineating the area quitclaimed.
Delineation is subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
121. Parking Structure Access Gates and Security Fencing.
The geometric configuration and circulation for the gated
entrance in the parking structure shall be designed as follows
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Provide details on design and function of the fence
and gates within the parking structure.
Provide a pedestrian access at the security gate
meeting accessibility requirements.
PW
Building Permit
Issuance
122. Guest Parking. The Developer shall operate the parking
structure in a manner that allows guests to obtain access and
park inside.
PW
Building Permit
Issuance
123. Parking Structure. The parking structure shall comply with
the parking structure requirements of the Off-street Parking
Ordinance, unless otherwise specified in these conditions of
approval, and shall meet the following requirements:
Minimum Parking Stall Dimensions shall be as listed
below:
o Standard Stalls: 9’ x 18’
o Compact Stalls: 8.5’ x 17’
o Additional 2.5’ width adjacent to walls or other
obstructions
o Parking space width of 9’ will be measured from
the edge of columns.
o Accessible stalls shall conform to current
accessibility requirements with no reduction
granted
Provide hose bibs as needed for periodic wash down
of within the parking structure.
Inside the parking garage, provide a turnaround
space for vehicles at the interior gate and fence that
restricts through vehicle access. Vehicles
approaching the gate and fence need an area to turn
around if no parking is available.
Indicate guest parking and leasing office parking stalls
within the structure.
PW
Building Permit
Issuance
124. Lighting.
The Applicant/Developer shall prepare a photometric
plan to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Engineer, Director of Community Development, the
City’s Consulting Landscape Architect and Dublin
Police Services.
The photometric plan shall show lighting levels which
take into consideration, poles, low walls and other
obstructions.
Exterior lighting shall be provided within the parking
structure and on the building, and shall be of a design
and placement so as not to cause glare onto adjoining
properties, businesses or to vehicular traffic.
PL, PW,
PO
Building Permit
Issuance
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 386
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
25
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
Lighting used after daylight hours shall be adequate
to provide for security needs.
The plan shall show measurements for the parking
structure, connecting paths, pedestrian bridges,
common areas and outside of residential areas.
Lighting inside of the parking structure shall be of a
level which is high enough to promote safety within
the structure, and at no point should the lighting level
be below 1.0 foot-candle.
The parking lot lights shall also be designed to
eliminate any pockets of high & low illuminated areas.
Prior to Occupancy, the applicant shall request an
inspection of the lighting levels in the structure to
determine if lighting is sufficient. If additional lights
are required to be installed to meet the 1.0 foot-
candle requirement, the Applicant shall do so prior to
Occupancy.
125. Parking Structure Drainage. Construction drawings shall
include information to demonstrate how runoff within the
parking structure will be captured. All runoff from within the
parking structure shall be collected prior to exiting the
structure, and discharged to a connection to the sanitary
sewer system per DSRSD requirements.
PW Building Permit
Issuance or
Approval of
Grading/Improv
ement Plans
126. On-Street Parking Removal. Remove 20 feet of parallel
parking (one space) adjacent to the parking structure
entrance along the north side of Campbell Lane.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
127. Sidewalk and Frontage Grading. Sidewalks within the
public right-of-way shall have a maximum cross slope of
below 2.0%. The cross slope shall be maintained for a
minimum distance of one foot behind the frontage sidewalks
where there is adjacent landscaping, stairs or pathway.
PW
Approval of
Grading/Improv
ement Plans
128. Existing Crosswalk Relocation on Campbell Lane. The
existing marked crosswalk at the curved section of Campbell
Lane (uncontrolled corner) shall be relocated outside the
horizontal curve, subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
129. Common Area Improvements. Common area
improvements owned or maintained by the Homeowners
Association or Property Manager are subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval and
shall be included in the Tract Improvement Agreement. Such
improvements include, but are not limited to: curb & gutter,
pavement areas, sidewalks, access ramps and driveways;
parking spaces; street lights and appurtenances, drainage
facilities, utilities, landscape and irrigation facilities, common
area landscaping, stormwater treatment facilities, striping and
signage, and fire hydrants.
PW
Building Permit
Issuance or
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
130. Signing and Striping Plan. Construction drawings shall
include signing and striping plans, subject to the review and
approval of the City Engineer.
PW Building Permit
Issuance and
Improvement
Plan Approval
131. Curb Ramps. All pedestrian ramps shall be unidirectional
ramps, providing access to a single crosswalk, including the
PW
Improvement
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 387
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
26
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
intersection of Campbell Lane and DeMarcus Boulevard.
The design shown on the submitted Site Plan shall be
revised to meet the unidirectional ramp requirement.
Plan Approval
132. Existing Curb and Gutter. Existing curb and gutter along
the project frontages of the public rights-of-way shall be
evaluated for condition and compliance with current Public
Works standards, and shall be repaired or replaced with the
development of the site, as determined by the City Engineer.
Construction drawings shall show repair or replacement
required.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
133. Existing Pavement at Private Drive. Existing pavement
within the private drive along the north side of the project
shall be evaluated for condition and compliance with current
Public Works standards, and shall be repaired or replaced
with the development of the site, as determined by the City
Engineer. Construction drawings shall show repair or
replacement required.
PW
Approval of
Improvement
Plans
134. Remediation of Adjacent Public Streets. The Applicant
shall be responsible for remediation of the adjacent public
streets, damaged by any construction activity (including utility
trench cuts), as determined by the City Engineer.
Remediation may include pavement treatment such as a
slurry seal or a grind and overlay.
PW
Acceptance of
Improvements
135. Existing Storm Drainage System. The Applicant shall
verify all downstream storm drain facilities are adequately
sized prior to discharging to any off-site storm drainage
system. If the downstream system is not adequately sized,
the Applicant shall be responsible for improving the
downstream system to accommodate the project runoff.
PW
Approval of
Grading/Improv
ement Plans
136. Standard General Notes. Standard General Notes and
project specific notes shall be shown on the construction
drawing set in accordance with current Public Works
standards.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
137. Existing Condition Information. The construction drawing
set shall provide all existing information along project
perimeter and public street frontage, including existing curb
elevations and gutter slopes along adjacent streets.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
138. Proposed Design Information. The construction drawing
set shall provide all proposed information, typical slopes at
walkways and parking structure, overland release from site,
and show how runoff from site will be collected and conveyed
upstream of public sidewalks.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
139. Sections and Details. Construction drawings shall include
necessary sections and details to clarify construction, as
determined by the Public Works Department.
PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans
140. Grading and Drainage. Construction drawings shall include
necessary information to clarify grading, drainage and
overland release of runoff within open air areas such as
plazas, lounges, bridge, and landscape areas.
PW Approval of
Grading/Improv
ement Plans
DUBLIN SAN RAMOM SERVICES DISTRICT
141. d Prior to issuance of any building permit, complete
improvement plans shall be submitted to DSRSD that
conform to the requirements of the Dublin San Ramon
DSRSD Issuance of
Building Permits
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 388
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
27
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
Services District Code, the DSRSD “Standard Procedures,
Specifications and Drawings for Design and Installation of
Water and Wastewater Facilities”, all applicable DSRSD
Master Plans and all DSRSD policies.
142. All mains shall be sized to provide sufficient capacity to
accommodate future flow demands in addition to each
development project’s demand. Layout and sizing of mains
shall be in conformance with DSRSD utility master planning.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
143. Sewers shall be designed to operate by gravity flow to
DSRSD’s existing sanitary sewer system. Pumping of
sewage is discouraged and may only be allowed under
extreme circumstances following a case by case review with
DSRSD staff. Any pumping station will require specific
review and approval by DSRSD of preliminary design reports,
design criteria, and final plans and specifications. The
DSRSD reserves the right to require payment of present
worth 20 year maintenance costs as well as other conditions
within a separate agreement with the applicant for any project
that requires a pumping station.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
144. Domestic and fire protection waterline systems for Tracts or
Commercial Developments shall be designed to be looped or
interconnected to avoid dead end sections in accordance
with requirements of the DSRSD Standard Specifications and
sound engineering practice.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
145. DSRSD policy requires public water and sewer lines to be
located in public streets rather than in off-street locations to
the fullest extent possible. If unavoidable, then public sewer
or water easements must be established over the alignment
of each public sewer or water line in an off-street or private
street location to provide access for future maintenance
and/or replacement.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
146. Prior to approval by the City of a grading permit or a site
development permit, the locations and widths of all proposed
easement dedications for water and sewer lines shall be
submitted to and approved by DSRSD.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
147. All easement dedications for DSRSD facilities shall be by
separate instrument irrevocably offered to DSRSD or by offer
of dedication on the Final Map.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
148. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building Permit or
Construction Permit by the Dublin San Ramon Services
District, whichever comes first, all utility connection fees
including DSRSD and Zone 7, plan checking fees, inspection
fees, connection fees, and fees associated with a wastewater
discharge permit shall be paid to DSRSD in accordance with
the rates and schedules established in the DSRSD Code.
DSRSD Issuance of
Building Permits
149. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building Permit or
Construction Permit by the Dublin San Ramon Services
District, whichever comes first, all improvement plans for
DSRSD facilities shall be signed by the District Engineer.
Each drawing of improvement plans shall contain a signature
block for the District Engineer indicating approval of the
sanitary sewer or water facilities shown. Prior to approval by
the District Engineer, the applicant shall pay all required
DSRSD fees, and provide an engineer’s estimate of
DSRSD Issuance of
Building Permits
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 389
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
28
CONDITION TEXT RESPON.
AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:
construction costs for the sewer and water systems, a
performance bond, a one-year maintenance bond, and a
comprehensive general liability insurance policy in the
amounts and forms that are acceptable to DSRSD. The
applicant shall allow at least 15 working days for final
improvement drawings reviewed by DSRSD before signature
by the District Engineer.
150. No sewer line or waterline construction shall be permitted
unless the proper utility construction permit has been issued
by DSRSD. A construction permit will only be issued after all
of the items in the condition immediately above have been
satisfied.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
151. The applicant shall hold DSRSD, its Board of Directors,
commissions, employees, and agents of DSRSD harmless
and indemnify and defend the same from any litigation,
claims, or fines resulting from the construction and
completion of the project.
DSRSD Issuance of
Building Permits
152. Improvement plans shall include recycled water
improvements as required by DSRSD. Services for
landscape irrigation shall connect to recycled water mains.
Applicant must obtain a copy of the DSRSD Recycled Water
Use Guidelines and conform to the requirements therein.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
153. Above ground backflow prevention devices/double detector
check valves shall be installed on fire protection systems
connected to the DSRSD water main. The applicant shall
collaborate with the Fire Department and with DSRSD to size
and configure its fire system. The applicant shall minimize the
number of backflow prevention devices /double detector
check valves installed on its fire protection system. The
applicant shall minimize the visual impact of the backflow
prevention devices/double detector check valves through
strategic placement and landscaping.
DSRSD Issuance of
Improvement
Plans
154. Development plans will not be approved until landscape
plans are submitted and approved.
DSRSD Issuance of
Building Permits
155. Grading for construction shall be done with recycled water. DSRSD During
Construction
156. Temporary portable irrigation meters in areas with recycled
water service shall be allowed for cross-connection and
coverage testing for a maximum of 14 days.
DSRSD On-going
157. The project is located within the District Recycled Water Use
Zone, which calls for installation of recycled water irrigation
systems to allow for the future use of recycled water for
approved landscape irrigation demands. Recycled water will
be available as described in DSRSD Water System Master
Plan, March 2016. Unless specifically exempted by the
District Engineer, compliance with Ordinance 301, as may be
amended or suspended, is required. The applicant must
submit landscape irrigation plans to DSRSD. All irrigation
facilities shall be in compliance with District’s “Recycled
Water Use Guidelines” and the Department of Health
Services requirements for recycled water irrigation.
DSRSD Issuance of
Building Permits
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 390
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
29
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 5th day of
December 2017, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036 Parcel A-3 Stage 2 PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\CC Attachments\3. City Council Resolution approving a Site
Development Review Permit and Tentative Map 8437 for Site A-3.docx
6.1.c
Packet Pg. 391
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
8
4
3
7
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
c
BA
R
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
8/28/2017 4:25:53
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
A
0
0
-
C
O
V
E
R
S
H
E
E
T
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
EN
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
R
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
SI
T
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
R
E
V
I
E
W
(
S
D
R
)
PL
A
N
N
E
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
Z
O
N
I
N
G
D
I
S
T
RI
C
T
S
T
A
G
E
2
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
AU
G
U
S
T
2
9
T
H
,
2
0
1
7
TE
L
:
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
EM
A
I
L
:
AR
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
:
90
1
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
S
T
R
E
E
T
,
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
0
SA
N
F
R
A
N
C
I
S
C
O
,
C
A
9
4
1
0
5
(4
1
5
)
2
9
3
-
5
7
0
0
DA
V
I
D
I
S
R
A
E
L
di
s
r
a
e
l
@
b
a
r
a
r
c
h
.
c
o
m
BA
R
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
TE
L
:
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
EM
A
I
L
:
CI
V
I
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
46
7
0
W
I
L
L
O
W
R
O
A
D
,
S
U
I
T
E
2
5
0
PL
E
A
S
A
N
T
O
N
,
C
A
9
4
5
8
8
(9
2
5
)
3
9
6
-
7
7
5
1
ER
I
C
G
I
R
O
D
eg
i
r
o
d
@
b
k
f
.
c
o
m
BK
F
TE
L
:
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
EM
A
I
L
:
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
:
23
2
5
3
R
D
S
T
R
E
E
T
SA
N
F
R
A
N
C
I
S
C
O
,
C
A
9
4
1
0
7
(4
1
5
)
4
3
1
-
7
8
7
8
DA
V
I
D
F
L
E
T
C
H
E
R
df
l
e
t
c
h
e
r
@
f
l
e
t
c
h
e
r
s
t
u
d
i
o
.
c
o
m
FL
E
T
C
H
E
R
S
T
U
D
I
O
AS
H
T
O
N
A
T
D
U
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
,
L
L
C
6.1.d Packet Pg. 392Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/29/2017 8:44:04
AM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
PROJECT DATA / SHEET LIST16036 A 01DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARDSHEET LIST VICINITY MAP DUBLIN BLVD IRON HORSE REGIONAL TRAIL DE MARCUS BLVD CAMPBELL LN.SITECAMP PARKS MILITARY BASE CAMPBELL GREENCAMPBELL LN.HAMLET LN.IRON HORSE PKWYIRON HORSE PKWY DUBLIN/PLEASANTON BART STATIONARTHUR H. BREED, JR. FWY
PR
O
J
E
C
T
D
A
T
A
SHT NOENTITLEMENTS05/24/17 ENT RESUB 08/28/17 C6.1EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILSXXC6.0EROSION CONTROL PLANXXC5.1STORMWATER CONTROL DETAILSXC5.0STORMWATER CONTROL PLANXXC4.0UTILITY PLANXXC3.0GRADING PLANXXC2.0CIVIL SITE PLANXXC1.0EXISTING CONDITIONS PLANXXC0.0TITLE SHEETXXCIVIL L6.00CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING PLANXXL5.00CAMPBELL LANE WEST STREETSCAPE PLANXXL4.00CAMPBELL LANE SOUTH STREETSCAPE PLANXXL3.00DEMARCUS BLVD STREETSCAPE PLANXXL2.00SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE STREETSCAPE PLANXXL1.00ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLANXXLANDSCAPE P 01BUILDING MATERIALSXA 25APPENDIXXA 24GREENPOINT CHECKLISTXXA 23GREENPOINT CHECKLISTXXA 22GREENPOINT CHECKLISTXXA 21ENLARGED TYPICAL UNIT PLANSXXA 20BUILDING SECTIONS - EAST/WESTXXA 19BUILDING SECTIONS - NORTH/SOUTHXXA 18ELEVATIONS - NORTH & EASTXXA 17ELEVATIONS - SOUTH & WESTXXA 16FLOOR PLAN - ROOFXXA 15FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 7XXA 14FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 6XXA 13FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 5XXA 12FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 4XXA 11FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3XXA 10FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2XXA 09FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL1XXA 08PERSPECTIVE VIEWXXA 07PERSPECTIVE VIEWXXA 06PERSPECTIVE VIEWXXA 05PERSPECTIVE VIEWXXA 04SITE PLANXXA 03SITE AERIAL DIAGRAMXXA 02EXISTING CONDITIONSXXARCHITECTURAL
Ro
o
f
T
e
r
r
a
c
e
92
8
Po
d
i
u
m
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
:
2
4
,
9
2
0
Le
v
e
l
1
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
1
9
,
0
3
0
Si
t
e
A
r
e
a
:
10
2
,
6
7
0
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
(
R
e
s
R
e
n
t
a
b
l
e
G
S
F
/
R
e
s
T
o
t
a
l
G
S
F
)
75
%
To
t
a
l
21
0
,
0
3
3
2
,
5
0
1
5
8
,
3
4
7
27
8
,
4
1
7
00
0
12
6
,
6
5
7
40
5
,
0
7
4
0
1
6,
7
4
0
2
,
5
0
1
2
,
8
5
9
8
4
4
2
8
0
7
,
5
0
1
20
,
7
2
5
00
0
62
,
8
9
6
83
,
6
2
1
2
9,
6
9
8
0
28
3
8
,
3
0
0
18
,
2
8
1
00
0
63
,
7
6
1
82
,
0
4
2
3
46
,
1
5
3
0
4
6
4
1
,
8
7
8
1
0
,
0
1
2
58
,
5
0
7
00
0
0
58
,
5
0
7
4
48
,
3
6
1
0
1
0
,
2
5
2
58
,
6
1
3
00
0
0
58
,
6
1
3
5
49
,
0
8
5
0
1
0
,
6
9
6
59
,
7
8
1
00
0
0
59
,
7
8
1
6
28
,
3
5
2
0
9
2
8
6
,
5
5
4
35
,
8
3
4
00
0
0
35
,
8
3
4
7
21
,
6
4
4
0
5
,
0
3
2
26
,
6
7
6
00
0
0
26
,
6
7
6
Le
v
e
l
"
R
e
n
t
a
b
l
e
"
S
F
L
o
b
b
y
Fi
t
n
e
s
s
P
o
o
l
L
e
a
s
i
n
g
L
o
u
n
g
e
C
o
n
f
C
l
u
b
R
m
Co
r
e
G
r
o
s
s
"
R
e
n
t
a
b
l
e
"
C
o
r
e
G
r
o
s
s
G
r
o
s
s
G
S
F
To
t
a
l
R
e
s
.
Re
s
.
A
m
e
n
i
t
y
Re
s
.
R
e
s
.
R
e
t
a
i
l
R
e
t
a
i
l
R
e
t
a
i
l
G
a
r
a
g
e
T
O
T
A
L
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
A
R
E
A
T
A
B
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
wt
13
0
C
l
a
s
s
1
b
i
k
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
al
l
s
-
(
1
C
l
a
s
s
I
s
p
a
c
e
s
:
1
D
U
+
1
C
l
a
s
s
I
s
p
a
c
e
:
e
v
e
r
y
4
D
U
o
v
e
r
1
0
0
)
Re
q
u
i
r
e
d
(
T
i
t
l
e
2
4
)
:
1
3
0
11
,
6
6
5
13
0
LE
V
E
L
A
R
E
A
T
O
T
A
L
CO
U
N
T
BI
C
Y
C
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
(
W
A
L
L
M
O
U
N
T
E
D
)
-
3
%
o
f
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
(
3
3
0
s
t
a
l
l
s
)
=
1
1
E
V
c
h
a
r
g
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
(
p
e
r
C
A
G
r
e
e
n
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
4
.
1
0
6
)
:
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
-
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
E
V
c
h
a
r
g
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
EV
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
To
t
a
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
H
C
A
c
c
e
s
i
b
l
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
:
9
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
s
t
a
l
l
s
2%
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
(
2
8
0
st
a
l
l
s
)
;
6
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
s
t
a
l
l
s
5%
o
f
g
u
e
s
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
(
5
0
s
t
al
l
s
)
:
3
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
s
t
a
l
l
s
ii
i
:
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
ii
:
3
3
0
s
t
a
l
l
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
1
5
%
g
u
e
s
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
(
5
0
s
t
a
l
l
s
)
i:
1
.
5
s
p
a
c
e
s
p
e
r
D
U
=
1
.
5
x
2
2
0
=
3
3
0
TA
R
G
E
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
M
I
X
SP
A
C
E
S
P
E
R
1
0
0
0
s
q
f
t
o
f
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
0
.
8
3
SP
A
C
E
S
P
E
R
U
N
I
T
1
.
5
0
%
7.
3
%
2
4
.
2
%
6
2
.
5
%
3
.
3
%
2
.
7
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
To
t
a
l
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
H
C
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
9
TO
T
A
L
24
8
0
2
0
7
1
1
9
33
1
Un
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
A
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
5%
3
Un
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
/
G
u
e
s
t
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
15
%
5
0
115
4
1
8
3
1
1
9
15
9
As
s
i
g
n
e
d
A
c
c
e
s
i
b
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
2%
6
2
9
3
9
1
2
4
0
0
17
2
As
s
i
g
n
e
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
2
8
0
8'
x
1
7
'
9
'
x
1
7
'
9
'
x
1
8
'
9
'
X
1
8
'
LE
V
E
L
C
O
M
P
A
C
T
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
E
V
A
D
A
T
O
T
A
L
CO
U
N
T
PE
R
C
E
N
T
T
O
T
A
L
H
C
S
T
A
L
L
S
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
AC
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
44
.
5
5
%
%
T
w
o
B
e
d
r
o
o
m
s
o
r
L
a
r
g
e
r
%
1
0
.
0
%
4
1
.
8
%
3
.
6
%
3
5
.
9
%
8
.
6
%
1
0
0
.
0
%
TO
T
A
L
22
9
2
8
7
9
1
9
22
0
12
6
-
1
-
9
22
7
-
3
-
12
3
42
0
2
1
8
4
4
8
4
32
0
2
2
0
4
4
9
5
42
1
2
2
0
4
5
1
6
41
2
1
1
0
3
3
0
7
36
1
7
4
2
1
64
0
t
y
p
.
S
F
8
0
0
t
y
p
.
S
F
9
7
5
t
y
p
.
S
F
1
1
2
0
t
y
p
.
S
F
1
2
8
0
t
y
p
.
S
F
LE
V
E
L
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
x
1
B
E
D
1
+
B
E
D
2
x
2
B
E
D
3
x
2
B
E
D
T
O
T
A
L
CO
U
N
T
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
U
N
I
T
M
I
X
G 04EGRESS DIAGRAMSXG 03EGRESS DIAGRAMSXA 01.1CODE ANALYSISXA 01PROJECT DATA / SHEET INDEXXXA 00COVER SHEETXXGENERAL SCARLETT DR.
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
T
A
B
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
TY
P
E
I
I
I
A
O
V
E
R
T
Y
P
E
1
A
4
&
5
S
T
O
R
I
E
S
O
V
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
TY
P
E
V
A
O
V
E
R
T
Y
P
E
1
A
ST
O
R
Y
/
H
E
I
G
H
T
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
3
S
T
O
R
I
E
S
O
V
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
ST
O
R
Y
/
H
E
I
G
H
T
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
5
S
T
O
R
I
E
S
O
V
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
R-
2
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
A-
3
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
A
M
E
N
I
T
I
E
S
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
G
R
O
U
P
S
S
-
2
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
G
A
R
A
G
E
SP
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
F
U
L
L
Y
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
E
D
(
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
Y
S
T
E
M
)
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
T
Y
P
E
S
I
A
,
1
1
1
-
A
,
V
A
SE
T
B
A
C
K
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
20
’
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
A
T
D
E
MA
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
.
MA
X
I
M
U
M
H
E
I
G
H
T
5
S
T
O
R
I
E
S
O
V
E
R
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
DE
N
S
I
T
Y
A
B
O
V
E
2
5
.
1
D
U
/
A
C
SI
T
E
A
R
E
A
1
0
2
,
6
7
0
PR
O
J
E
C
T
U
S
E
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
,
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
S
U
P
P
O
R
T
A
N
D
PR
I
V
A
T
E
A
M
E
N
I
T
Y
,
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
LA
N
D
U
S
E
H
I
G
H
D
E
N
S
I
T
Y
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
SP
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
L
A
N
TR
A
N
S
I
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
D
E
S
I
G
N
A
T
E
D
A
S
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
SU
B
-
A
R
E
A
W
I
T
H
I
N
E
A
S
T
E
R
N
D
U
B
L
I
N
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
PL
A
N
ZO
N
I
N
G
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
DU
B
L
I
N
T
R
A
N
S
I
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
-
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
P
L
A
N
/
SP
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
L
A
N
A
M
E
N
D
M
E
N
T
S
S
T
A
G
E
1
P
L
A
N
N
E
D
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
R
E
Z
O
N
I
N
G
2
0
0
2
AS
S
E
S
S
O
R
S
P
A
R
C
E
L
N
U
M
B
E
R
9
8
6
-
0
0
3
4
-
0
0
9
-
0
0
PR
O
J
E
C
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
CO
R
N
E
R
O
F
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
.
A
N
D
C
A
M
P
B
E
L
L
LA
N
E
,
D
U
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
D
U
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
E
A
S
4
5
,
0
5
9
BI
C
Y
C
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
1
5
0
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
3
3
5
TO
T
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
2
2
0
LO
T
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
+
/
-
8
0
%
PR
O
J
E
C
T
D
E
N
S
I
T
Y
9
3
D
U
/
A
C
R
E
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 393Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:26:16
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
CODE ANALYSIS16036 A 01.1MSCheckerDUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
1.BUILDING DESCRIPTION THE PROJECT IS COMPOSED OF (1) INDEPENDENT BUILDING ON ONE PARCEL. THE SITE IS LOCATED ALONG DUBLIN BLVD BETWEEN DEMARCUS BLVD AND CAMPBELL LANE • COMPOSED OF 2 ABOVE GRADE LEVELS IN TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION, COMPOSED OF A COMBINATION OF S-2 PARKING GARAGE, AMENITIES AND R-2 ACCESSORY SPACES • ABOVE THE PODIUM a. TYPE VA AT LEVELS 3-5 ON THE WEST / SOUTH BUILDING b. TYPE IIIA AT LEVELS 3-7 ON THE EAST AND CENTER TOWERS • BUILDING OCCUPANCIES ARE GROUP R-2, GROUP S-2, GROUP A-3 2.OCCUPANCY AND CONSTRUCTION TYPE (CHAPTER 3)LEVEL 1 & LEVEL 2 – CONSTRUCTION TYPE 1A • PARKING GARAGE (2 STORY)OCCUPANCY: S-2 • RESIDENTIAL AMENITY AND ACCESSORY SPACES OCCUPANCY: R-2, A-3 ACCESSORY LEVEL 3-7 – CONSTRUCTION TYPE IIIA AND VA • RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY: A-3, R-2 3.HORIZONTAL BUILDING SEPARATION ALLOWANCE / SPECIAL PROVISIONS (SECTION 510.2)THE TWO STORIES ABOVE GRADE PLANE (TYPE IA CONSTRUCTION) SHALL BE CONSIDERED A SEPARATE AND DISTINCT BUILDING FROM THE STORIES ABOVE (TYPE IIIA AND VA) FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:• DETERMINING AREA LIMITATIONS • CONTINUITY OF FIRE WALLS • LIMITATION OF NUMBER OF STORIES • TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 4.AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM (SECTION 903)PROJECT TO BE FULLY SPRINKLERED, NFPA 13 SYSTEM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 903 6.MIXED USE AND OCCUPANCY • ACCESSORY OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 302.1. THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CODE SHALL APPLY TO EACH PORTION OF THE BUILDING BASED ON THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION OF THAT SPACE. (SECTION 508.2)• ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT AND NUMBER OF STORIES OF THE BUILDING CONTAINING THE ACCESSORY OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 504 FOR THE MAIN OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING.• THE ALLOWABLE AREA OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE BASED ON THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 506 FOR THE MAIN OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING. AGGREGATE ACCESSORY OCCUPANCIES SHALL NOT OCCUPY MORE THAN 10 PERCENT OF THE FLOOR AREA IF THE STORY IN WHICH THEY ARE LOCATED.7.ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA CALCULATION TYPE lllA CONSTRUCTION: LEVELS 3-7 ON THE EAST AND CENTER TOWERS BUILDING COMPARTMENT 1:FRONTAGE INCREASE CALCULATION:W = (L1 × w1 + L2 × w2 + L3 × w3…)/F W= (128’ x 30’ + 69’-4” x 30)/ 197’-4”W= 30 AMOUNT OF INCREASE:If = [F/P - 0.25]W/30 If = [197’-4”/525’ - 0.25] 30/30 If = 0.13 ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA SINGLE-OCCUPANCY, MULTISTORY BUILDING Aa = [At + (NS × If)] × Sa Aa = [24,000 + (24,000 × 0.13)] × 2 Aa = 54,240 SF = MAX ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA BUILDING COMPARTMENT 2:FRONTAGE INCREASE CALCULATION:W = (L1 × w1 + L2 × w2 + L3 × w3…)/F W = (149’ x 22’ + 75’ x 30’)/224' = 10.218 W= 30 AMOUNT OF INCREASE:If = [F/P - 0.25]W/30 If = [224’/541’’ - 0.25] 30/30 If = 0.16 ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA SINGLE-OCCUPANCY, MULTISTORY BUILDING Aa = [At + (NS × If)] × Sa Aa = [24,000 + (24,000 × 0.16)] × 2 Aa = 55,680 SF = MAX ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
12
.
E
X
I
T
I
N
G
P
R
O
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
OC
C
U
P
A
N
T
L
O
A
D
S
A
B
O
V
E
W
H
I
C
H
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
T
W
O
M
E
A
N
S
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
A
S
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
0
6
.
2
.
1
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
LO
A
D
A-
3
4
9
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
S
R-
2
1
0
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
S
S-
2
2
9
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
S
SE
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
B
E
T
W
E
E
N
S
T
A
I
R
W
A
Y
S
M
U
S
T
B
E
N
O
L
E
S
S
T
H
A
N
1
/
3
RD
T
H
E
L
E
N
G
T
H
O
F
M
A
X
I
M
U
M
D
I
A
G
O
N
A
L
O
F
T
H
E
AR
E
A
S
E
R
V
E
D
P
E
R
1
0
0
7
.
1
.
2
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
2
,
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
DI
N
G
I
S
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
O
R
N
F
P
A
1
3
R
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
CO
M
M
O
N
P
A
T
H
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
(
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
0
6
.
2
.
1
)
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
LE
N
G
T
H
A-
3
7
5
’
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
Y
S
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
0
6
.
2
.
1
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
A
R-
2
1
2
5
’
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
0
6
.
2
.
1
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
A
S-
2
1
0
0
’
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
0
6
.
2
.
1
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
A
EX
I
T
A
C
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
(
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
1
7
)
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
LE
N
G
T
H
A-
3
2
5
0
’
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
1
7
.
2
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
B
R-
2
2
5
0
’
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
1
7
.
2
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
B
S-
2
4
0
0
’
W
I
T
H
N
F
P
A
1
3
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
YS
T
E
M
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
1
0
1
7
.
2
F
O
O
T
N
O
T
E
C
AC
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
M
E
A
N
S
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
AN
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
M
E
A
N
S
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
H
A
L
L
BE
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
I
N
A
T
L
E
A
S
T
T
H
E
S
A
M
E
N
U
MB
E
R
A
S
T
H
O
S
E
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
E
D
I
N
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
10
0
7
.
1
.
1
A
N
D
1
0
0
6
.
1
–
S
E
E
A
B
O
V
E
F
O
R
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
N
U
M
B
E
R
O
F
E
X
I
T
S
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
L
O
A
D
.
A
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
T
A
L
E
X
I
T
W
I
L
L
B
E
PR
O
V
I
D
E
D
I
N
L
I
E
U
O
F
E
L
E
V
A
T
O
R
T
O
M
E
E
T
TH
E
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
M
E
A
N
S
O
F
E
G
R
E
S
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
PE
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
0
9
.
2
.
1
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
1
.
H
O
R
IZ
O
N
T
A
L
E
X
I
T
S
A
R
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
A
T
T
H
E
F
I
R
E
W
A
L
L
S
.
S
E
E
P
L
A
N
S
A
N
D
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
2
FO
R
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
DE
A
D
E
N
D
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
S
PE
R
1
0
2
0
.
4
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
2
,
R
-
2
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
I
E
S
A
R
E
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
5
0
F
T
.
D
E
A
D
E
N
D
S
W
H
E
R
E
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
I
S
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
TH
R
O
U
G
H
O
U
T
W
I
T
H
A
N
A
U
T
O
M
A
T
I
C
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
S
Y
S
T
E
M
.
A
4
8
”
C
L
E
A
R
W
I
D
T
H
A
T
A
S
T
A
I
R
W
A
Y
I
S
N
O
T
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
P
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
0
9
.
3
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
2
AR
E
A
S
O
F
R
E
F
U
G
E
A
R
E
N
O
T
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
P
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
0
9
.
3
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
5
&
8
10
0
9
.
2
–
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
I
T
Y
O
F
E
X
I
T
S
–
C
H
E
C
K
F
O
R
P
O
D
I
U
M
13
.
F
I
R
E
W
A
L
L
S
(
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
7
0
6
)
14
.
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
PR
O
J
E
C
T
I
S
A
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
L
Y
F
U
N
D
E
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
,
T
H
E
R
E
F
O
R
E
;
§
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
I
E
S
I
N
A
L
L
N
E
W
L
Y
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
V
E
R
E
D
M
U
L
T
I
-
F
A
M
I
L
Y
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
S
S
H
A
L
L
M
E
E
T
T
H
E
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
1
1
A
H
O
U
S
I
N
G
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
§
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
U
N
I
T
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
S
:
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
S
I
N
1
-
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
S
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
O
P
T
I
O
N
2
P
E
R
C
B
C
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
1
3
4
A
.
2
.
2N
D
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
S
I
N
2
-
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
S
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
O
P
T
I
O
N
2
P
E
R
C
B
C
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
1
3
4
A
.
2
MA
S
T
E
R
B
A
T
H
R
O
O
M
S
I
N
2
-
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
S
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
I
T
E
M
S
7
-
1
2
O
F
C
B
C
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
1
3
4
A
.
2
O
P
T
I
O
N
2
.
§
C
O
M
M
O
N
U
S
E
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
(
S
U
C
H
A
S
L
O
B
B
I
E
S
,
S
H
A
R
E
D
A
M
E
N
I
T
Y
S
P
A
C
E
S
,
C
O
M
M
O
N
T
O
I
L
E
T
R
O
O
M
S
)
S
H
A
L
L
M
E
E
T
T
H
E
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
1
1
2
7
A
15
.
L
I
G
H
T
A
N
D
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
O
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
C
B
C
S
T
A
N
D
A
R
D
S
F
O
R
L
I
G
H
T
A
N
D
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
A
T
H
A
B
I
T
A
B
L
E
R
O
O
M
S
.
P
E
R
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
2
0
5
.
2
.
1
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
LI
G
H
T
I
N
A
N
Y
R
O
O
M
I
S
P
E
R
M
I
T
T
E
D
T
O
B
E
CO
N
S
I
D
E
R
E
D
A
S
A
P
O
R
T
I
O
N
O
F
A
N
A
D
J
O
I
N
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
W
H
E
R
E
O
N
E
-
H
A
L
F
O
F
T
H
E
A
R
E
A
O
F
TH
E
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
A
L
L
I
S
O
P
E
N
A
N
D
U
N
O
B
S
T
R
U
C
T
E
D
A
N
D
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
S
A
N
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
O
F
N
O
T
L
E
S
S
T
H
A
N
1
/
1
0
TH
O
F
T
H
E
F
L
O
O
R
A
R
E
A
O
F
TH
E
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
R
O
O
M
O
R
2
5
S
Q
F
T
,
W
H
I
C
H
E
V
E
R
I
S
G
R
E
A
T
E
R
.
16
.
P
L
U
M
B
I
N
G
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
C
O
U
N
T
S
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
P
L
U
M
B
I
N
G
C
O
D
E
2
0
1
6
T
A
B
L
E
A
“
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
L
O
A
D
F
A
C
T
O
R
"
A
P
P
L
I
E
S
.
*
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
2
9
0
2
.
1
N
O
T
E
3
;
W
H
E
N
D
E
S
I
G
N
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
T
L
O
A
D
I
S
L
E
S
S
T
H
A
N
1
0
P
E
R
S
O
N
S
,
A
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
Y
U
S
A
B
L
E
B
Y
E
I
T
H
E
R
S
E
X
MA
Y
B
E
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
B
Y
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
.
17
.
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
R
R
A
D
I
O
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
PE
R
2
0
1
6
C
A
F
I
R
E
C
O
D
E
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
5
1
0
,
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
O
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
R
A
D
I
O
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
F
O
R
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
R
S
.
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
O
A
L
L
O
W
F
O
R
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
A
N
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
R
S
R
A
D
I
O
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
Y
S
T
E
M
.
U
P
O
N
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
CO
M
P
L
E
T
I
O
N
,
R
A
D
I
O
T
E
S
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
C
O
N
D
U
C
T
E
D
T
O
D
E
T
E
R
M
I
N
E
I
F
A
N
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
R
E
S
P
O
N
D
E
R
S
R
A
D
I
O
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
H
A
L
L
BE
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
.
18
.
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
E
S
C
A
P
E
A
N
D
R
E
S
C
U
E
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
(
P
E
R
C
B
C
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
0
3
0
)
§
T
Y
P
E
V
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
:
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
I
N
G
R
O
U
P
R
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
S
L
E
E
P
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
S
B
E
L
O
W
T
H
E
F
O
U
R
T
H
S
T
O
R
Y
A
B
O
V
E
GR
A
D
E
P
L
A
N
E
,
S
E
E
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
L
E
G
E
N
D
F
O
R
E
M
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
Y
M
B
O
L
A
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
F
O
R
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
.
§
T
Y
P
E
1
&
I
I
I
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
:
E
M
E
R
G
E
NC
Y
E
S
C
A
P
E
A
N
D
R
E
S
C
U
E
WI
N
D
O
W
S
A
R
E
N
O
T
R
E
Q
U
I
R
ED
I
N
R
-
2
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
SL
E
E
P
I
N
G
R
O
O
M
S
,
P
E
R
1
0
3
0
E
X
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
1
§
S
E
E
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
S
F
O
R
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
I
Z
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
19
.
E
N
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
SE
C
T
I
O
N
3
2
0
2
.
3
.
3
S
T
A
T
E
S
E
N
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
’
O
R
M
O
R
E
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
C
O
M
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
3
:
FR
O
N
T
A
G
E
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
:
W
=
(
L
1
×
w
1
+
L
2
×
w
2
+
L
3
×
w
3
…
)
/
F
W=
(
1
1
8
’
x
3
0
’
)
/
1
1
8
’
W=
3
0
AM
O
U
N
T
O
F
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
:
If =
[
F
/
P
-
0
.
2
5
]
W
/
3
0
If =
[
1
1
8
’
/
3
7
3
’
-
0
.
2
5
]
3
0
/
3
0
If =
0
.
0
6
AL
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
SI
N
G
L
E
-
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
,
M
U
L
T
I
S
T
O
R
Y
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
Aa =
[
A
t
+
(
N
S
×
I
f)]
×
S
a
Aa =
[
2
4
,
0
0
0
+
(
2
4
,
0
0
0
×
0
.
0
6
)
]
×
2
Aa =
5
0
,
8
8
0
=
M
A
X
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
C
O
M
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
4
:
*N
O
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
T
A
K
E
N
AL
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
SI
N
G
L
E
-
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
,
M
U
L
T
I
S
T
O
R
Y
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
Aa =
[
A
t
+
(
N
S
×
I
f)]
×
S
a
Aa =
[
2
4
,
0
0
0
+
(
2
4
,
0
0
0
×
0
)
]
×
2
Aa =
4
8
,
0
0
0
=
M
A
X
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
TY
P
E
V
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
:
L
E
V
E
L
S
3
-
5
O
N
T
H
E
S
O
U
T
H
/
W
E
S
T
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
C
O
M
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
5
:
*N
O
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
T
A
K
E
N
AL
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
SI
N
G
L
E
-
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
,
M
U
L
T
I
S
T
O
R
Y
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
Aa =
[
A
t
+
(
N
S
×
I
f)]
×
S
a
Aa =
[
3
6
,
0
0
0
+
(
1
2
,
0
0
0
×
0
)
]
×
2
Aa =
7
2
,
0
0
0
=
M
A
X
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
8.
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
(
T
A
B
L
E
5
0
8
.
4
)
OC
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
SE
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
R
E
Q
D
SE
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
S-
2
T
O
R
-
2
1
H
R
3
H
R
S-
2
T
O
A
-
3
N
O
N
E
-
R-
2
T
O
A
-
3
1
H
R
1
H
9.
F
I
R
E
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
(
T
A
B
L
E
6
0
1
A
N
D
6
0
2
)
FI
R
E
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
F
O
R
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
(
T
A
B
L
E
S
6
0
1
)
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
TY
P
E
I
A
TY
P
E
I
I
I
A
TY
P
E
V
A
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
F
R
A
M
E
3
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
EX
T
E
R
I
O
R
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
3
H
R
2
H
R
1
H
R
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
3
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
EX
T
E
R
I
O
R
N
O
N
-
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
S
E
E
B
E
L
O
W
F
O
R
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
F
O
R
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
S
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
N
O
N
-
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
0
H
R
0
H
R
0
H
R
FL
O
O
R
2
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
RO
O
F
1
.
5
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
*N
O
T
E
:
AL
L
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
S
I
N
T
H
E
T
Y
P
E
I
I
I
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
T
O
B
E
2
H
R
R
A
T
E
D
AL
L
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
F
R
A
M
I
N
G
A
N
D
P
L
Y
W
O
O
D
S
H
E
A
T
H
I
N
G
I
N
T
H
E
T
Y
P
E
I
I
I
A
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
T
O
B
E
F
I
R
E
R
E
T
A
R
D
A
N
T
T
R
E
A
T
E
D
(F
R
T
)
FI
R
E
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
F
O
R
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
S
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
(
T
A
B
L
E
6
0
2
)
FI
R
E
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
(
F
T
)
T
Y
P
E
I
A
T
Y
P
E
I
I
I
A
T
Y
P
E
V
A
X
<
5
'
1
H
R
*
1
H
R
*
1
H
R
*
5'
T
O
1
0
'
1
H
R
*
1
H
R
1
H
R
10
'
T
O
3
0
'
1
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
30
'
<
X
NO
N
E
N
O
N
E
N
O
N
E
FI
R
E
R
E
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
R
A
T
I
N
G
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
W
A
L
L
T
Y
P
E
S
:
WA
L
L
T
Y
P
E
T
Y
P
E
I
A
T
Y
P
E
I
I
I
A
T
Y
P
E
V
A
SH
A
F
T
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
S
2
H
R
2
H
R
2
H
R
EX
I
T
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
S
2
H
R
2
H
R
2
H
R
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
W
A
L
L
S
,
A
N
D
1
H
R
1
H
R
1
H
R
WA
L
L
S
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
N
G
D
W
E
L
L
I
N
G
U
N
I
T
S
10
.
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
MA
X
I
M
U
M
A
R
E
A
O
F
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
B
A
S
E
D
O
N
F
I
R
E
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
D
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
P
E
R
T
A
B
L
E
7
0
5
.
8
FI
R
E
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
D
I
S
T
.
(
F
T
)
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
A
R
E
A
X
<
3
'
UP
,
S
NO
T
P
E
R
M
I
T
T
E
D
3'
T
O
5
'
UP
,
S
15
%
5'
T
O
1
0
'
UP
,
S
25
%
10
'
T
O
1
5
'
UP
,
S
45
%
15
'
T
O
2
0
'
UP
,
S
75
%
20
'
T
O
2
5
'
UP
,
S
NO
L
I
M
I
T
11
.
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
G
A
R
A
G
E
S-
2
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
(
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
4
0
6
)
PA
R
K
I
N
G
G
A
R
A
G
E
I
S
C
L
A
S
S
I
F
I
E
D
A
S
E
N
C
L
O
S
E
D
(
4
0
6
.
2
)
VE
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
:
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
T
O
B
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
I
N
A
C
C
O
R
D
A
N
C
E
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
C
A
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
C
O
D
E
.
SE
E
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
VE
H
I
C
L
E
B
A
R
R
I
E
R
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
(
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
4
0
6
.
4
.
3
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 394Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
UP
UP
UPDN
DN
UP
DN
DN
EXIT STAIR 1
EX
I
T
S
T
A
I
R
3
EL
E
V
A
T
O
R
S
ELEVATORS
VE
H
I
C
L
E
E
N
T
R
Y
*
**
*
*EXIT STAIR 2
EGRESS SEPERATION 30
0' - 4" > MIN. 141'-0"
MAX. DIAGONAL LEN
GTH 423'-0"
EX
I
T
A
T
G
R
A
D
E
EX
I
T
A
T
G
R
A
D
E
RESIDENTIAL UNITS R-2 238333
3
3
4
3
3
3
1 51
149 2
1 6 6
34 19 17187FITNESS ROOM A-3 LEASING OFFICE B
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S-
2
EGRESS SEPARATION 224' - 9" > MIN. 141'-0"
MAX. DIAGONAL LEN
GTH 423'-0"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
=
1
0
7
'
-
0
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
=
1
0
7
'
-
0
"
EXIT ACESS TRAVEL = 139'-0"RESIDENTIAL UNITS R-2
3
9
PA
R
K
I
N
G
S-
2
3
3
4
3
3
33 3 5 5 3
1 6 2
163
18
1
14 171
7 9 '-1 0 " > 1 /3 OF T HE D I A G.E GR E S S S E P AR A T I ON
1
1
1
'
-
2
"
>
1
/
3
O
F
T
H
E
D
I
A
G
.
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
9 9'-7" > 1 /3 O F T H E D I AG .
E GR E SS S EP A RA T ION
10
3
'
-0"
>
1/
3 O
F TH
E DIAG.
EG
RES
S
S
EP
A
RATI
O
N
> 1/3 OF THE DIAG.
EGRESS SEPERATION
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
=
1
0
7
'
-
0
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
=
1
2
9
'
-
7
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
=
1
2
6
'
-
6
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
=
1
2
8
'
-
0
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
=
1
0
0
'
-
6
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
=
1
4
2
'
-
0
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
=
1
3
8
'
-
0
"
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
R-
2
6
23
AM
E
N
I
T
Y
R-
2
39
38
444 385
6 5 5 4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
3
4
5
5
2
8
AM
E
N
I
T
Y
R-
2
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
4 5 5 5 7
3
6 4 4 4 5
5
4
5
5
6
4
6
3
0
61
11
0
10
4
49
33
H.
E
.
H.
E
.
H.
E
.
H.
E
.
H.
E
.
USED FOR FRONTAGE INCREASE
75' - 0"
US
E
D
F
O
R
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
I
N
C
R
E
A
S
E
14
9
'
-
6
"
12
5
'
-
5
"
1
0
3
'
-
0
"
>
1
/
3
O
F
T
H
E
D
I
A
G
.
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
=
1
0
7
'
-
0
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
=
1
2
9
'
-
7
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
=
1
2
8
'
-
0
"
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
R-
2
23
34
AM
E
N
I
T
Y
R-
2
54445
6 5 5 4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
3
4
5
5
3
5
5
5
7
6
3
54
36
14
3
3
3
23
90
OU
T
D
O
O
R
L
O
U
N
G
E
R-
2
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
=
1
4
7
'
-
0
"
7 9 '-1 0 " > 1 /3 O F T H E D I A G .E G RE S S SE P A RA T IO N
1
1
1
'
-
2
"
>
1
/
3
O
F
T
H
E
D
I
A
G
.
E
G
R
E
S
S
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
9 9'-7" > 1 /3 O F T H E D I AG .
E GR E SS S EP A RA T ION
H.
E
.
H.
E
.
H.
E
.
RO
O
F
A
C
C
E
S
S
2
-
H
R
R
A
T
E
D
ST
A
I
R
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
NO
T
E
:
NO
N
-
S
T
O
R
Y
NO
S
E
C
O
N
D
E
G
R
E
S
S
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
D
RO
O
F
A
T
LE
V
E
L
6
LEGEND 3 HR RATED FIRE BARRIER / FIRE WALL 0 EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE AND COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVELEGRESS ROUTEOCCUPANT LOAD0 COMBINED NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS AT EXIT OCCUPANT LOAD (PER TABLE 1004.1.1)OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR - OCCUPANCY 200 G.S.F. - RESIDENTIAL (R-3)50 G.S.F.- FITNESS (A-3)15 G.S.F.- AMENITY (R-2)100 G.S.F.- LEASING (B)200 G.S.F.- PARKING (S-2)300 G.S.F.- MEP (S-2)HORIZONTAL EXITH.E.BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:30:49
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
As indicatedEGRESS DIAGRAMS16036 G 03AuthorCheckerDUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
1
"
=
4
0
'
-
0
"
G
0
3
1
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L
E
V
E
L
1
1
"
=
4
0
'
-
0
"
G
0
3
2
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L
E
V
E
L
2
1
"
=
4
0
'
-
0
"
G
0
3
3
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L
E
V
E
L
S
3
-
5
1
"
=
4
0
'
-
0
"
G
0
3
4
Le
v
e
l
6
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 395Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
DN
DN
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
T
R
A
V
E
L
=
1
0
6
'
-
0
"
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
=
1
2
8
'
-
0
"
RE
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
U
N
I
T
S
R-2 23 22
29
30
EX
I
T
A
C
E
S
S
TR
A
V
E
L
=
1
4
7
'
-
0
"
54445119
5
3
4
5
5
3
5
5
5
7
6
3
3
3EXIT ACESS TRAVEL = 78'-0"7 0 '-1 0 " > 1 /3 OF T HE D I A G.E GR E S S S E P AR A T I ON
MA X . D I A G O N A L L EN G TH 2 3 4 ' - 6 "
M A X . D I A G O N A L L E N G T H 2 0 8' - 9 "H.E.
H.
E
.
LEGEND 3 HR RATED FIRE BARRIER / FIRE WALL 0 EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE AND COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVELEGRESS ROUTEOCCUPANT LOAD0 COMBINED NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS AT EXIT OCCUPANT LOAD (PER TABLE 1004.1.1)OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR - OCCUPANCY 200 G.S.F. - RESIDENTIAL (R-3)50 G.S.F.- FITNESS (A-3)15 G.S.F.- AMENITY (R-2)100 G.S.F.- LEASING (B)200 G.S.F.- PARKING (S-2)300 G.S.F.- MEP (S-2)HORIZONTAL EXITH.E.
RO
O
F
A
C
C
E
S
S
2
-
H
R
R
A
T
E
D
ST
A
I
R
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
NO
T
E
:
NO
N
-
S
T
O
R
Y
NO
S
E
C
O
N
D
E
G
R
E
S
S
RE
Q
U
I
R
E
D
RO
O
F
A
T
LE
V
E
L
7
ROOFBARarchitects901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:31:10
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
As indicatedEGRESS DIAGRAMS16036 G 04AuthorCheckerDUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
1
"
=
4
0
'
-
0
"
G
0
4
1
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L
E
V
E
L
7
1
"
=
4
0
'
-
0
"
G
0
4
2
EX
I
T
D
I
A
G
R
A
M
R
O
O
F
P
L
A
N
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 396Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
SI
T
E
A
-
3
3/
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
1
0
:
1
8
:
3
0
AM
C:
\
A
u
t
o
d
e
s
k
\
1
6
0
3
6
U
D
R
D
u
b
l
i
n
-
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
_
a
l
i
n
k
.
r
v
t
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
TITLE SHEET
C0.0
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 397
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
NOTES:LEGEND:
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
SI
T
E
A
-
3
3/
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
1
0
:
1
8
:
3
0
AM
C:
\
A
u
t
o
d
e
s
k
\
1
6
0
3
6
U
D
R
D
u
b
l
i
n
-
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
_
a
l
i
n
k
.
r
v
t
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PLAN
C1.0
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 398
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
UP
UP
6%12%
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCC
CCCCCCC
CC CC
8%
3' - 0"3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"0' - 0"
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"
6%
1' - 0"
0' - 0"
8%
CCC
1' - 7"0' - 8"
1' - 0"
0' - 9"
C CCCCCCCCC
CC
C
C
C
C
1' - 10"
1'-6"
1'-6"
CAMPBELL LANE
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
GARAGE
FITNESS
ROOM
LEASING
OFFICE
LOBBY
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
TRASHTRASHFIRE
ROOM
WEST FRONTAGE: CAMPBELL LANE
1"=5'A NORTH FRONTAGE: PRIVATE DRIVE
1"=5'B EAST FRONTAGE: DEMARCUS BLVD
1"=5'C SOUTH FRONTAGE: CAMPBELL LANE
1"=5'D
SITE PLAN LEGEND:
SITE PLAN NOTES:
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
SI
T
E
A
-
3
3/
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
1
0
:
1
8
:
3
0
AM
C:
\
A
u
t
o
d
e
s
k
\
1
6
0
3
6
U
D
R
D
u
b
l
i
n
-
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
_
a
l
i
n
k
.
r
v
t
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
CIVIL SITE PLAN
C2.0
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 399
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
UP
UP
6%12%
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCC
CCCCCCC
CC CC
8%
3' - 0"3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"0' - 0"
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"
6%
1' - 0"
0' - 0"
8%
CCC
1' - 7"0' - 8"
1' - 0"
0' - 9"
C CCCCCCCCC
CC
C
C
C
C
1' - 10"
1'-6"
1'-6"
CAMPBELL LANE
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
LEGEND:GRADING NOTES:
DRIVEWAY DETAIL
1"=10'
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
SI
T
E
A
-
3
3/
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
1
0
:
1
8
:
3
0
AM
C:
\
A
u
t
o
d
e
s
k
\
1
6
0
3
6
U
D
R
D
u
b
l
i
n
-
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
_
a
l
i
n
k
.
r
v
t
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
GRADING PLAN
C3.0
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 400
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
UP
UP
6%12%
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCC
CCCCCCC
CC CC
8%
3' - 0"3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"0' - 0"
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"
6%
1' - 0"
0' - 0"
8%
CCC
1' - 7"0' - 8"
1' - 0"
0' - 9"
C CCCCCCCCC
CC
C
C
C
C
1' - 10"
1'-6"
1'-6"
CAMPBELL LANE
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
LEGEND:
NOTES:
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
SI
T
E
A
-
3
3/
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
1
0
:
1
8
:
3
0
AM
C:
\
A
u
t
o
d
e
s
k
\
1
6
0
3
6
U
D
R
D
u
b
l
i
n
-
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
_
a
l
i
n
k
.
r
v
t
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
UTILITY PLAN
C4.0
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 401
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
S L O P E
S L O P E
S L O P E
S
L
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
S L O P E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
SLOPE
S L O P E
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
S L O P E
SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE SLOPE
S L O P E
S
L
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
CAMPBELL LANE
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
NOTES:LEGEND:
STORMWATER
CONTROL PLAN
C5.0
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
SI
T
E
A
-
3
3/
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
1
0
:
1
8
:
3
0
AM
C:
\
A
u
t
o
d
e
s
k
\
1
6
0
3
6
U
D
R
D
u
b
l
i
n
-
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
_
a
l
i
n
k
.
r
v
t
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 402
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
1 FLOW-THRU PLANTER
NTS
2 STORMWATER FILTER
NTS
STORMWATER
CONTROL DETAILS
C5.1
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
SI
T
E
A
-
3
3/
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
1
0
:
1
8
:
3
0
AM
C:
\
A
u
t
o
d
e
s
k
\
1
6
0
3
6
U
D
R
D
u
b
l
i
n
-
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
_
a
l
i
n
k
.
r
v
t
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 403
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
UP
UP
6%12%
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
CCC
CCCCCCC
CC CC
8%
3' - 0"3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"0' - 0"
3' - 0"
3' - 0"
0' - 0"
0' - 0"
6%
1' - 0"
0' - 0"
8%
CCC
1' - 7"0' - 8"
1' - 0"
0' - 9"
C CCCCCCCCC
CC
C
C
C
C
1' - 10"
1'-6"
1'-6"
CAMPBELL LANE
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
x x
x x x x x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
xx
x
xxxx
xx
xxx
x
xxx
x
xxxxxxxx
xxx
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x x x
x
x
x x x x x x x x x x
GARAGE
FITNESS
ROOM
LEASING
OFFICE
LOBBY
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
TRASHTRASHFIRE
ROOM
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
SI
T
E
A
-
3
3/
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
1
0
:
1
8
:
3
0
AM
C:
\
A
u
t
o
d
e
s
k
\
1
6
0
3
6
U
D
R
D
u
b
l
i
n
-
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
_
a
l
i
n
k
.
r
v
t
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
EROSION CONTROL
PLAN
C6.0
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 404
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
DRAWNBY
C
P
HECKEDBY
ROJECTNO
DATE ISSUE
DRA
C
P
HE
RO
DA
SCALE:AS NOTED
DU
B
L
I
N
,
C
A
SI
T
E
A
-
3
3/
1
6
/
2
0
1
7
1
0
:
1
8
:
3
0
AM
C:
\
A
u
t
o
d
e
s
k
\
1
6
0
3
6
U
D
R
D
u
b
l
i
n
-
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
_
a
l
i
n
k
.
r
v
t
16036
ENTITLEMENTS
DU
B
L
I
N
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
ACM
JCJ
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL
EROSION CONTROL
NOTES AND DETAILS
C6.1
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 405
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
AS SHOWN
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
L1.00
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
PERCENT LANDSCAPING LEGEND
GROUND LEVEL:
69.9% HARDSCAPE, 18,850 SF
25.5% PLANTING AREA, 6,881 SF
3.9% BIORETENTION PLANTER, 1,042 SF
0.7% ARTIFICAL TURF, 185 SF
PODIUM:
52.2% HARDSCAPE, 12,778 SF
25.8% RAISED PLANTER, 6,308 SF
11.5% BIORETENTION PLANTER, 2,809 SF
5.5% ARTIFICIAL TURF, 1,355 SF
5.0% POOL, 1,210 SF
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
EAST
PODIUM
COURTYARD
WEST
PODIUM
COURTYARD
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
W
E
S
T
CAMPBELL LANE SOUTH
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
CAMELLIA PLACE
scale: 1” = 20’N
PL
PL
PLPL
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL IRRIGATION AT SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTINGS TO BE DRIP IRRIGATION. INDIVIDUAL
BUBBLERS WILL BE PROVIDED AT TREE PLANTINGS.
2. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO INCLUDE 3” LAYER OF 3/8” BLACK
MINI-CHIP MULCH
3. SOIL ANALYSIS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH FINAL LANDSCAPE
PLAN WITH BUILDING PERMIT/IMPROVEMENT PLANS
4. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FALLS TO OWNER
FOR SITE AND SIDEWALK DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE
BUILDING. THE CITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STREET
AND ANY MEDIAN ISLANDS
L3.00L5.00
L2.00
L4.00
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTY LINE
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 406
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
STREETSCAPE PLAN
AS SHOWN
L2.00
1111
FA
C
E
O
F
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
15
1
3
’
-
4
”
11’-0”
10’-0”
7’-1”1
4
’
-
6
”
6’
-
0
”
7’
-
9
”
2’
-
8
”
14
’
-
2
”
8’
-
9
”
1
1
’
-
1
0
”
1
0
’
-
6
”
1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Sedum rubrotinctum
Jelly-bean Sedum
Water Usage: L
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
CAMELLIA PLACE
scale: 1” = 10’
scale: 1/4” = 1’
3’-4”5’-0”8’-0”
PARALLEL PARKING
(PLANTED
BULBOUT BEYOND)
6” CURB
30” MAX.
PLANTING HT.
SIDEWALKCONCRETE
PLANTER
3’-4”*PLANTER
DEPTH
VARIES
A
A’
PL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
10’-4” TYP3’-7”5’-8”9’-6”6’-0”15’-6”8’-11”16’-9”6’-0”2’-0”
TYP.37’-2”
26’-0”22’-6”22’-6”
23’-8” TYP.5’-8”4’-0”50’-9”
20’-0” TYP
8’-0” TYP8’-0” TYP
5’-0” TYP
3’-4” TYP
N
STREETSCAPE SECTION AA’
MATERIALS
PLANT PALETTE
Limonium californicum
Elymus glaucus Echeveria
Western Marsh Rosemary
BI
O
R
E
T
E
N
T
I
O
N
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
Blue Wild Rye
Raised Concrete Planter/
Bioretention Planter
Integral Color Concrete,
Color: Southern Blush
Echeveria
SITE FURNISHINGS
4
5 559
1012
12
12
9
9
181818
11
11
A’
A
Faceted Steel Bench Modular Concrete Unit Pavers,
Color: Foundry
Faceted Steel Retaining/
Planter Wall
8 29
29
29
PL PL
1 Gal, 18” O.C.
Water Usage: L
5 Gal, 12” O.C.
Water Usage: L
5 Gal, 1’-0” O.C.
Water Usage: L
Amphitheatre Stair Seating
3 33
42
2
23
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTY LINE
Water Usage: L
1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Festuca rubra
Creeping Red Fescue
Water Usage: L
5 Gal, 4’ O.C.
Lavandula dentata var. candicans
Gray Leaved French Lavender
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
STREET TREES
Arbutus unedo
Strawberry Tree
24” Box
Water Usage: L
19191919
KEY
SIDEWALK,
INTEGRAL COLOR CONC
COLOR: SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
SIDEWALK,
MODULAR CONC
UNIT PAVERS
MANUF: BELGARD
COLOR: FOUNDRY
FINISH: SMOOTH
SIZE: 6X12
SIDEWALK,
CITY STANDARD CONC
PARALLEL PARKING
TOWNHOME STOOP
PUBLIC FLEX SPACE
AMPHITHEATRE STAIR
SEATING, INTEGRAL COLOR
CONCRETE
COLOR: SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
FACETED STEEL BENCH,
HEIGHT: 18”
FLOW THROUGH PLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PLANTING AREA
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
CITY STD. CROSSWALK
(E) RAISED CROSSWALK
(E) BULB-OUT
(E) UTILITY VAULT
UTILITIES (PROPOSED),
SCREENED W/PLANTING
(E) STREET SIGN
(E) LIGHT POLE
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
FACETED STEEL PLANTER
HEIGHT: 18”
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
22
12
(E) PLANTER ISLAND
21
GARAGE ENTRY
ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIAN RAMP
DEPRESSED CURB
WITH BOLLARDS
13
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MODULAR STEEL
RETAINING WALL,
HEIGHT VARIES:
0”-18”
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
TRAFFIC BOLLARD
CITY STD. CURB RAMP
ARTIFICIAL TURF
STOOP PLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
10 STREET TREE:
Platanus acerifolia
‘Bloodgood’
(E) STREET TREE:
Platanus acerifolia
‘Bloodgood’, TBC
STREET TREE:
Pyrus calleryana
‘Aristocrat’
STREET TREE:
Arbutus unedo
(E) STREET TREE:
Pyrus calleryana
‘Aristocrat’
(E) STREET TREE:
Arbutus unedo
PRIVATE REALM TREE:
Lagerstroemia indica
(E) STREET TREE:
Laurus nobilis ‘Saratoga’
FUTURE STREET TREE
(N.I.C.)
INTEGRAL COLOR
CONCRETE SEATWALL
COLOR:
SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 407
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
AS SHOWN
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
DEMARCUS BLVD
STREETSCAPE PLAN
L3.00scale: 1” = 10’N
scale: 1/4” = 1’
20’-0”
2’-6”
PLANTING
6’
11’-0”
10’-0”, VARIES10’-0”, VARIES 5’-0”8’-0”
PARALLEL
PARKING
6” CURB
11’ WALK WITH
5’X5’ SQ TREE WELL
PLANTINGPRIVATE FITNESS AREA
STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
1’-6”, MAX
PL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
STREETSCAPE SECTION BB’
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
20 20
25
16
16
20’-0”
23’-6” O.C.25’-0” O.C., TYP 25’-0” O.C., TYP
FA
C
E
O
F
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
4 4
4
SITE FURNISHINGS
5’-0”
B
22’-6” O.C.22’-6” O.C.22’-6” O.C.24’-0” O.C.12’-6” O.C., TYP 12’-6” O.C., TYP12’-6” O.C., TYP 12’-6” O.C., TYP
5’-0”
TW +0”
TW +18”
TW +18”
TW +18”
TW +6”
TW +0”
TW +6”
TW +6”
TW +6”TW +0”
TW +0”
TW +0”TW +0”
MATCHLINE, SEE L4.00
TW +18”
TW +0”
7’-4”
13’-0”
28’-0”
7’-6”9’-2”
4’-6”
6’-0”
5’-8”
1’-8”
6’-3”
15’-10”20’-0”12’-8”
2’-0”15’-5”
8’-0”
6’-0”
2’-6”
B B’
B’
1 1 11111111
1
2
2
2
2
2222222222
2
3
6
6
8
8
8
8
8
8
1111
11
1111
13
13 13
13 13
13
13
1313
13
11 11 11
23
11 11 1119
19
19
19 11 11 11 11
DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
SH
A
R
E
D
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
PL
PL
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
Water Usage: M
Water Usage: L Water Usage: L
Water Usage: L
1 Gal, 36” O.C.5 Gal, 48” O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Lomandra longifolia ‘Tanika’Salvia leucantha ‘Midnight’Sempervivum ‘Purple Beauty’
Tanika Lomandra Purple Mexican Sage Hen and Chicks
PLANT PALETTE
EA
S
E
M
E
N
T
5 Gal, 24” O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Anigozanthos ‘Bush Tango’Sedum rubrotinctum
Orange Kangaroo Paw Jelly-bean Sedum
Raised Concrete Planter/
Bioretention Planter
Faceted Steel Bench Faceted Steel Retaining/
Planter Wall
Amphitheatre Stair Seating
20’-0”
STORM
DRAIN
EASEMENT
Water Usage: L
30’-0”
VISIBILITY ZONE, S.C.D.
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTY LINE
STREET TREES
30” MAX.
PLANTING HT.
24” Box
Water Usage: M
Pyrus calleryana ‘Aristocrat’
Aristocrat Pear
Echeveria
Echeveria
5 Gal, 1’-0” O.C.
Water Usage: L
MATCHLINE, SEE L3.00
MATERIALS
Integral Color Concrete,
Color: Southern Blush
Modular Concrete Unit Pavers,
Color: Foundry
KEY
SIDEWALK,
INTEGRAL COLOR CONC
COLOR: SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
SIDEWALK,
MODULAR CONC
UNIT PAVERS
MANUF: BELGARD
COLOR: FOUNDRY
FINISH: SMOOTH
SIZE: 6X12
SIDEWALK,
CITY STANDARD CONC
PARALLEL PARKING
TOWNHOME STOOP
PUBLIC FLEX SPACE
AMPHITHEATRE STAIR
SEATING, INTEGRAL COLOR
CONCRETE
COLOR: SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
FACETED STEEL BENCH,
HEIGHT: 18”
FLOW THROUGH PLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PLANTING AREA
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
CITY STD. CROSSWALK
(E) RAISED CROSSWALK
(E) BULB-OUT
(E) UTILITY VAULT
UTILITIES (PROPOSED),
SCREENED W/PLANTING
(E) STREET SIGN
(E) LIGHT POLE
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
FACETED STEEL PLANTER
HEIGHT: 18”
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
22
12
(E) PLANTER ISLAND
21
GARAGE ENTRY
ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIAN RAMP
DEPRESSED CURB
WITH BOLLARDS
13
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MODULAR STEEL
RETAINING WALL,
HEIGHT VARIES:
0”-18”
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
TRAFFIC BOLLARD
CITY STD. CURB RAMP
ARTIFICIAL TURF
STOOP PLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
10 STREET TREE:
Platanus acerifolia
‘Bloodgood’
(E) STREET TREE:
Platanus acerifolia
‘Bloodgood’, TBC
STREET TREE:
Pyrus calleryana
‘Aristocrat’
STREET TREE:
Arbutus unedo
(E) STREET TREE:
Pyrus calleryana
‘Aristocrat’
(E) STREET TREE:
Arbutus unedo
PRIVATE REALM TREE:
Lagerstroemia indica
(E) STREET TREE:
Laurus nobilis ‘Saratoga’
FUTURE STREET TREE
(N.I.C.)
INTEGRAL COLOR
CONCRETE SEATWALL
COLOR:
SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 408
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
CAMPBELL LANE SOUTH
STREETSCAPE PLAN
AS SHOWN
L4.00scale: 1” = 20’N
PL
7 7
4 4 24
19
24
20
20
18
12
CAMPBELL LANE SOUTH
C
C’
C’
C
1
1
3
6
11
2121
14 11
3
11
11
11
5’-0” TYP
6’-0” TYP4’-0”
6’-4”8’-0”
20’-0”
7’-0”TYP11’-5”7’-0”
6’-6”6’-11”
11’-0”7’-7”
10’-8”
6’-0”
5’-11”
1’-0” TYP1’-0” TYP
2’-6” TYP
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
PL
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
Water Usage: M Water Usage: LWater Usage: L
1 Gal, 6’ O.C.5 Gal, 4’ O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Passiflora incarnata Lavandula dentata var. candicans Festuca glauca
Purple Passionflowe Gray Leaved French Lavender Douglas Iris
5 Gal, 24” O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Anigozanthos ‘Bush Tango’Sedum rubrotinctum
Orange Kangaroo Paw Jelly-bean Sedum
Water Usage: L Water Usage: L
Raised Concrete Planter/
Bioretention Planter
Faceted Steel Bench Faceted Steel Retaining/
Planter Wall
Amphitheatre Stair Seating
PLANTER ISLAND
PARALLEL PARKING
(BEYOND)
6” CURB
SIDEWALKAT-GRADE
PLANTING
2’-6”6’-0”4’-0”
8’-0”
1’6”6”
scale: 1/4” = 1’
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
STREETSCAPE SECTION CC’PLANT PALETTE
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
FA
C
E
O
F
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
SITE FURNISHINGS
48’-6”
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTY LINE
STREET TREES
30” MAX.
PLANTING HT.
26
Platanus acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’
London Plane Tree
24” Box
Water Usage: M
Echeveria
Echeveria
5 Gal, 1’-0” O.C.
Water Usage: L
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
,
S
E
E
L
4
.
0
0
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
,
S
E
E
L
3
.
0
0
MATERIALS
Integral Color Concrete,
Color: Southern Blush
Modular Concrete Unit Pavers,
Color: Foundry
KEY
SIDEWALK,
INTEGRAL COLOR CONC
COLOR: SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
SIDEWALK,
MODULAR CONC
UNIT PAVERS
MANUF: BELGARD
COLOR: FOUNDRY
FINISH: SMOOTH
SIZE: 6X12
SIDEWALK,
CITY STANDARD CONC
PARALLEL PARKING
TOWNHOME STOOP
PUBLIC FLEX SPACE
AMPHITHEATRE STAIR
SEATING, INTEGRAL COLOR
CONCRETE
COLOR: SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
FACETED STEEL BENCH,
HEIGHT: 18”
FLOW THROUGH PLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PLANTING AREA
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
CITY STD. CROSSWALK
(E) RAISED CROSSWALK
(E) BULB-OUT
(E) UTILITY VAULT
UTILITIES (PROPOSED),
SCREENED W/PLANTING
(E) STREET SIGN
(E) LIGHT POLE
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
FACETED STEEL PLANTER
HEIGHT: 18”
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
22
12
(E) PLANTER ISLAND
21
GARAGE ENTRY
ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIAN RAMP
DEPRESSED CURB
WITH BOLLARDS
13
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MODULAR STEEL
RETAINING WALL,
HEIGHT VARIES:
0”-18”
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
TRAFFIC BOLLARD
CITY STD. CURB RAMP
ARTIFICIAL TURF
STOOP PLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
10 STREET TREE:
Platanus acerifolia
‘Bloodgood’
(E) STREET TREE:
Platanus acerifolia
‘Bloodgood’, TBC
STREET TREE:
Pyrus calleryana
‘Aristocrat’
STREET TREE:
Arbutus unedo
(E) STREET TREE:
Pyrus calleryana
‘Aristocrat’
(E) STREET TREE:
Arbutus unedo
PRIVATE REALM TREE:
Lagerstroemia indica
(E) STREET TREE:
Laurus nobilis ‘Saratoga’
FUTURE STREET TREE
(N.I.C.)
INTEGRAL COLOR
CONCRETE SEATWALL
COLOR:
SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 409
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
CAMPBELL LANE WEST
STREETSCAPE PLAN
AS SHOWN
L5.00
BI
O
R
E
T
E
N
T
I
O
N
scale: 1” = 20’N
PLANT PALETTE
BI
O
R
E
T
E
N
T
I
O
N
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
4 4
4
8’-0”
20’-0”
23’-7”4’-0”
9’-8”
22’-0”11’-6”14’-10”TYP
14’-5”
2’-0”
6’-0”
6’-0”
2’-0”
6’-0”
2’-0”
4’-11
”
4’-0”6’-10”2’-0”
9’-0”
5’-10”
5’-0”
TYP
TYP
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
D’
D
3
3
19
19
19
19
19
11
2828
29 29
1111
11
11
11
9
9
5
9
3
3
3
21
18
1818
23
27
20
24 24
11 11
3
5’-0” TYP
6’-0” TYP
1’-0” TYP
2’-6” TYP
2’-1”
13
’
-
1
0
”
9’-
7
”
5’-
0
”
21
21
21
CAMPBELL LANE WEST
PL
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
S
O
U
T
H
SH
A
R
E
D
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
5 Gal, 24” O.C.1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Anigozanthos ‘Bush Tango’Sedum rubrotinctum
Orange Kangaroo Paw Jelly-bean Sedum
Water Usage: LWater Usage: L
Limonium californicum
Western Marsh Rosemary
1 Gal, 18” O.C.
Water Usage: L Water Usage: L
5 Gal, 4’ O.C.
Lavandula dentata var. candicans
Gray Leaved French Lavender
Water Usage: L
1 Gal, 12” O.C.
Festuca rubra
Creeping Red Fescue
scale: 1/4” = 1’
STREETSCAPE SECTION DD’
Raised Concrete Planter/
Bioretention Planter
SITE FURNISHINGS
Faceted Steel Bench Faceted Steel Retaining/
Planter Wall
Concrete Amphitheatre Stair
Seating
PLANTER ISLAND
PARALLEL PARKING
(BEYOND)
6” CURB
SIDEWALKAT-GRADE
PLANTING
FA
C
E
O
F
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
D
2’-6”6’-0”4’-0”
8’-0”
1’6”6”
D’
PL
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
26 26
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTY LINE
STREET TREES
30” MAX.
PLANTING HT.
Platanus acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’
London Plane Tree
24” Box
Water Usage: M
Echeveria
Echeveria
5 Gal, 1’-0” O.C.
Water Usage: L
22
TYP
MATERIALS
Integral Color Concrete,
Color: Southern Blush
Modular Concrete Unit Pavers,
Color: Foundry
KEY
SIDEWALK,
INTEGRAL COLOR CONC
COLOR: SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
SIDEWALK,
MODULAR CONC
UNIT PAVERS
MANUF: BELGARD
COLOR: FOUNDRY
FINISH: SMOOTH
SIZE: 6X12
SIDEWALK,
CITY STANDARD CONC
PARALLEL PARKING
TOWNHOME STOOP
PUBLIC FLEX SPACE
AMPHITHEATRE STAIR
SEATING, INTEGRAL COLOR
CONCRETE
COLOR: SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
FACETED STEEL BENCH,
HEIGHT: 18”
FLOW THROUGH PLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PLANTING AREA
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
CITY STD. CROSSWALK
(E) RAISED CROSSWALK
(E) BULB-OUT
(E) UTILITY VAULT
UTILITIES (PROPOSED),
SCREENED W/PLANTING
(E) STREET SIGN
(E) LIGHT POLE
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
FACETED STEEL PLANTER
HEIGHT: 18”
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
22
12
(E) PLANTER ISLAND
21
GARAGE ENTRY
ACCESSIBLE
PEDESTRIAN RAMP
DEPRESSED CURB
WITH BOLLARDS
13
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MODULAR STEEL
RETAINING WALL,
HEIGHT VARIES:
0”-18”
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
TRAFFIC BOLLARD
CITY STD. CURB RAMP
ARTIFICIAL TURF
STOOP PLANTER,
NATURAL CONCRETE,
HEIGHT: 18”
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
- 3/8” BLACK MINI-CHIP
MULCH, 3” DEEP
10 STREET TREE:
Platanus acerifolia
‘Bloodgood’
(E) STREET TREE:
Platanus acerifolia
‘Bloodgood’, TBC
STREET TREE:
Pyrus calleryana
‘Aristocrat’
STREET TREE:
Arbutus unedo
(E) STREET TREE:
Pyrus calleryana
‘Aristocrat’
(E) STREET TREE:
Arbutus unedo
PRIVATE REALM TREE:
Lagerstroemia indica
(E) STREET TREE:
Laurus nobilis ‘Saratoga’
FUTURE STREET TREE
(N.I.C.)
INTEGRAL COLOR
CONCRETE SEATWALL
COLOR:
SOUTHERN BLUSH
FINISH: MED SANDBLAST
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 410
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
AS SHOWN
05.24.17
08.28.17
ENTITLEMENTS
ENT RESUBMITTAL
CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING
PLAN
L6.00
Stake Mounted LED Path LightPool & Spa LightingPlay LightingTree Uplight Recessed Planter Wall Light String Lights
KEY
TREE UPLIGHT
PLAY LIGHTING
POOL & SPA LIGHTING
CITY STANDARD STREET LIGHT (E)
STAKE MOUNTED LED PATH LIGHT
RECESSED PLANTER WALL LIGHT
DECORATIVE STRING LIGHTS (STRUNG
ALONG TOP OF STEEL TRELLIS & POOL
CABANAS)
NOTE: LIGHT LOCATIONS ARE CONCEPTUAL
AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING A
PHOTOMETRIC STUDY. WILL BE SUBMITTED IN
BUILDING/SITEWORK PERMIT PLAN SUBMITTAL
scale: 1” = 20’N
CAMELLIA PLACE
PL
PL
PLPL
SHARED PRIVATE DR
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
NTS
N
KEY PLAN
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
W
E
S
T
CAMPBELL LANE SOUTH
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
LEGEND
LIMIT OF WORK
PROPERTY LINE
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 411
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
t
o
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
-
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
PARCEL 3 PM 8275 280 PM 71 CAMPBELL LN
CAMPBELL LN
DE MARCUS BLVDSHARED PRIVATE DRIVEBARarchitects901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:26:23
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1" = 50'-0"EXISTING CONDITIONS16036 A 02DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
1
- N
O
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
2
- N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
3
- S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
4
- S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
LA
N
E
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
LA
N
E
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
L
V
D
1
"
=
5
0
'
-
0
"
A
0
2
1
SI
T
E
P
L
A
N
-
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
2
1 3
3
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 412Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:26:27
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
SITE AERIAL DIAGRAM16036 A 03DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD CAMPBELL GREEN
DE MARCUS BLVD
DU
B
L
I
N
B
L
V
D
.
IRON HORSE REGI ON AL TR AI L CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
N
CAMPBELL LN
HAMLET LN.ELAN AT DUBLIN STATION 7 STORY MULTI-FAMILY AVALON DUBLIN STATION 5 STORY MULTI-FAMILY
CA
M
E
L
I
A
P
L
A
C
E
4
S
T
O
R
Y
M
U
L
T
I
-FA
M
I
L
Y
DU
B
L
I
N
T
R
A
N
S
I
T
CE
N
T
E
R
S
I
T
E
A
-1
3
S
T
O
R
Y
M
U
L
T
I
-FA
M
I
L
Y
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
DE MARCUS BLVD
DUBLIN BLVD.
SH
A
R
E
D
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 413Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
UP
UP
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
FI
R
E
RO
O
M
TRASH FITNESS YOGA/STRETCH LOBBY
TR
A
S
H
GA
R
A
G
E
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
RO
O
M
BO
I
L
E
R
RO
O
M
BI
K
E
ST
O
R
A
G
E
ID
F
40
0
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
258' - 3"
36
4
'
-
8
"
50'
- 0"
222' - 10 1/2"
PA
R
C
E
L
"
A
"
PM
7
3
9
5
25
4
P
M
2
8
PA
R
C
E
L
2
PM
8
2
7
5
28
0
P
M
7
1
LOT 1 TRACT 7525 279 PM 97
PA
R
C
E
L
1
PM
8
2
7
5
28
0
P
M
7
1
PA
R
C
E
L
3
PM
8
2
7
5
28
0
P
M
7
1
IR ON H OR SE REGIO N AL TR
AIL
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
CAMPBELL LANE
DE MARCUS BLVDRESIDENT LOADING ZONE
VE
H
I
C
U
L
A
R
E
N
T
R
Y
24
'
-
0
"
18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"22' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"
33
5
.
6
5
± 333.7
LO
B
B
Y
ENTRY PLAZA
SH
A
R
E
D
P
R
I
V
A
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
5'
-
1
1
1
/
2
"
2'
-
7
"
5'
-
6
"
20' - 4"6' - 0 1/2"2' - 4 1/2"
15' - 0"
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
L
I
N
E
335.1 ± 333.6± 333.8± 334.0± 334.3 ± 333.5
±
3
3
5
.
0
33
5
.
9
33
5
.
8
33
5
.
7
5
33
5
.
6
33
5
.
4
33
5
.
3
46
'
-
7
"
17
'
-
0
"
24
'
-
0
"
1' - 6"
GA
S
ME
T
E
R
CL
O
S
E
T
1
B
E
D
J
R
PA
C
K
A
G
E
S
1 BED JR 1 BED JR MAIL LEASINGCONFCONF
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
RO
O
M
FI
R
E
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
O
A
D
24' - 2 1/2"16' - 2"
REMOVE EXISTING MEDIAN26' - 0"14' - 3"
FI
R
E
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
O
A
D
STAIR 02ELEVSTAIR 03
ST
A
I
R
ST
A
I
R
0
4
STAIR 01
33
5
.
5
EL
E
V
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:26:47
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1" = 20'-0"SITE PLAN16036 A 04DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 10 204080'600ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 414Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:26:51
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
PERSPECTIVE VIEWS16036 A 05DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
AE
R
I
A
L
S
O
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
- CAMPBELL LANE AND DE MARCUS BOULEVARD05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 415Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:26:56
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
PERSPECTIVE VIEWS16036 A 06DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
- CAMPBELL LANE AND DE MARCUS BOULEVARD05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 416Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:27:01
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
PERSPECTIVE VIEWS16036 A 07DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
- CAMPBELL LANE AND DE MARCUS BOULEVARD05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 417Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:27:10
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
PERSPECTIVE VIEWS16036 A 08DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
NO
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
- DE MARCUS BOULEVARDNORTHWEST CORNER - CAMPBELL LANE
SO
U
T
H
E
A
S
T
C
O
R
N
E
R
- C
A
M
P
B
E
L
L
L
A
N
E
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 418Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
UP
UP
6%
12
%
1
A
2
0
22' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"17' - 0"2' - 6"
21' - 0"
18' - 0"24' - 2"17' - 0"
18
'
-
0
"
24
'
-
0
"
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
FI
R
E
RO
O
M
TRASH 1956 SFFITNESS 284 SF YOGA/STRETCH 2028 SFLOBBY
TR
A
S
H
GA
R
A
G
E
ELECTRICAL ROOM
24
'
-
0
"
BO
I
L
E
R
RO
O
M
BI
K
E
ST
O
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
E
N
T
R
Y
8' - 5"
8'
-
6
"
CL
TYP
2' - 0"
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
CC
CL
TYP
3' - 0"
R
2
2' - 0
"
CL
TYP
3' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 0"
CL TYP
3' - 10"
R 24' - 0"
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
8%
3'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
1' - 6"1' - 6"
1'
-
6
"
3' - 0"
3'
-
0
"
1'
-
6
"
1' - 6"RESIDENT LOADING ZONE
ID
F
6%
1'
-
0
"
1'
-
6
"
9' - 0"14' - 0"
5'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
12
7
7
S
F
LO
B
B
Y
9' - 0"9' - 0"
4' - 4"
5'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
24' - 0"
9'
-
0
"
3'
-
1
1
/
2
"
9'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
9
'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
SH
E
A
R
W
A
L
L
2'
-
6
"
8%
37
1
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
28' - 2"170' - 4"34' - 2"
-0'-4"-0'-5"-0'-3"0'-0"- 0'-6"
GA
R
A
G
E
F
E
N
C
E
,
N
O
TH
R
O
U
G
H
A
C
C
E
S
S
SE
C
U
R
I
T
Y
G
A
T
E
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
VAN
GU
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
GUEST
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
1' - 0"
TYP
2' - 10"
PA
C
K
A
G
E
S
EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
A
R
E
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
U
N
D
E
R
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
3
2
O
F
TH
E
2
0
1
6
C
B
C
20
1
6
C
B
C
3
2
0
2
.
3
.
3
E
N
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
O
R
M
O
R
E
F
E
E
T
AB
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
.
EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
F
E
E
T
(
4
5
7
2
M
M
)
O
R
MO
R
E
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
.
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
N
D
R
O
O
F
A
B
O
V
E
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
CC
C
1'
-
7
"
0' - 8"
1'
-
0
"
0'
-
9
"
C
CC
VA
N
GU
E
S
T
G
U
E
S
T
CC
C
C
C
C
C
GU
E
S
T
826 SFLEASING119 SFCONF135 SFCONF422 SFMAIL1 BED JR 1 BED JR
CCCCCC
REMOVE EXISTING MEDIAN
FH
9'
-
0
"
9
'
-
0
"
9
'
-
0
"
1'
-
1
0
"
0'-0"
8'
-
1
"
73
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
2
0
'
-
4
1
/
2
"
1
0
0
'
-
3
"
1
1
'
-
5
"
3
1
'
-
4
"
6
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
3
2
'
-
1
"
2' - 4 1/2"232' - 8"23' - 2 1/2"
27' - 4 1/2"203' - 2"27' - 8 1/2"
2'
-
7
"
41
'
-
0
"
27
5
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
23' - 6"5' - 1"32' - 1"20' - 4"
1'
-
6
"
1'
-
6
"
1
B
E
D
J
R
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
RO
O
M
GA
S
ME
T
E
R
CL
O
S
E
T
50
G
U
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
P
A
C
E
S
96
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
STAIR 02ELEVSTAIR 03
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
ST
A
I
R
0
4
STAIR 01BARarchitects901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:27:32
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 116036 A 09DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 419Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
UPDN
DN
UP
1
A
2
0
12
%
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1 BED1 BED JR 1 BED JR
ST
O
.
STORAGE 2 BED 2 BED 1 BED STORAGE
TR
A
S
H
ST
O
R
A
G
E
2' - 4 1/2"
OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW
2'
-
7
"
R
2
2' - 0
"
6%
4'
-
4
1
/
2
"
9'
-
0
"
C CCCCC C
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
CC CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
R 24' - 0"
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
TRASH
8'
-
1
"
37
1
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
20' - 4"
2' - 4 1/2"232' - 8"23' - 2 1/2"
9'
-
0
"
5
'
-
4
1
/
2
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
4'
-
4
1
/
2
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
5'
-
4
1
/
2
"
9'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
9
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
4'
-
0
"
24' - 0"18' - 0"4' - 7"
18
'
-
0
"
24
'
-
0
"
18' - 0"24' - 2"17' - 0"22' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"17' - 0"
9' - 0"5' - 0"9' - 0"5' - 0"9' - 0"
9'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9' - 0"
9' - 0"
4' - 4"5'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
CL
TYP
2' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 0"CL
TYP.
3' - 0"CL
TYP
3' - 10"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
2' - 0"
TYP
1' - 0"
TYP
2' - 10"
13
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
5
"
13
'
-
0
"
13
'
-
0
"
34
7
'
-
0
"
13' - 0"13' - 0"
13
'
-
0
"
73
'
-
7
"
20
'
-
4
1
/
2
"
10
0
'
-
3
"
42' - 9 1/2"6' - 0 1/2"32' - 1"27' - 8 1/2"203' - 2"27' - 4 1/2"
2'
-
7
"
41
'
-
0
"
27
5
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
23' - 6"5' - 1"32' - 1"20' - 4"
28' - 2"
96
'
-
6
"
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
ST
A
I
R
0
4
EL
E
V
OV
E
R
S
I
Z
E
D
PA
C
K
A
G
E
S
LO
B
B
Y
LOBBYCONFCONFSTAIR 02ELEVSTAIR 03
ST
A
I
R
STAIRSTAIR 01
CO
R
R
I
D
O
R
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:27:42
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 216036 A 10DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 420Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
DN
1
A
2
0
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1+
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2 BED1 BED 3 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED2 BED2 BED COMMUNITY / CLUB /REC ROOM
TR
A
S
H
TRASH
AM
E
N
I
T
Y
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
5'
-
6
"
96
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
73
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
20
'
-
4
1
/
2
"
14
3
'
-
0
"
5' - 11 1/2"32' - 3"
37
1
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
136' - 3"14' - 3"16' - 1"
3 8 ' - 2 1 /2"
1 1 4 ' - 6 1 /2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
6
6
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
2
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
1 8 ' - 1 1 /2"
17
'
-
1
"
11
9
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
26
'
-
1
1
"
12
0
'
-
1
"
37' - 5"32' - 1 1/2"
20' - 5 1/2"158' - 6"
232' - 6"
6
9
'
-
4
"
13' - 10 1/2"75' - 1"12' - 10 1/2"
14
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
14
'
-
3
"
PO
D
I
U
M
C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D
(S
E
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
)
PO
D
I
U
M
C
O
U
R
T
Y
A
R
D
(S
E
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
)
6
9
'
-
6
"
9
'
-
1
1
/
2
"
BRIDGE ABOVE
9'
-
4
"
CL39' - 11"
C
L
4
0
'
-
0
"
35
9
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
35
9
'
-
0
"
359' - 0"
35
9
'
-
0
"
35
9
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
25
'
-
0
"
8
'
-
9
1
/
2
"
3 ' - 2 1 /2 "
3' - 0"
2'
-
5
"
37
7
'
-
3
1
/
2
"
20' - 4"3 BED1 BED
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
1
B
E
D
J
R
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
STAIR 02ELEVSTAIR 03
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
ST
A
I
R
0
4
STAIR 01BARarchitects901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:28:00
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 316036 A 11DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 421Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
1
A
2
0
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2 BED2 BED2 BED
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
3
B
E
D
3 BED 3 BED1 BED1 BED2 BED
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1 BED
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1 BED
1
B
E
D
J
R
OPEN TO BELOW
TR
A
S
H
TRASH
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
27' - 8"203' - 2"27' - 4 1/2"136' - 3"14' - 3"16' - 1"
3 8 ' - 2 1 /2"
1 1 4 ' - 6 1 /2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
6
6
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
2
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
1 8 ' - 1 1 /2"
6
9
'
-
4
"
13' - 10 1/2"75' - 1"12' - 10 1/2"
14
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
14
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
UN
I
T
A
B
O
V
E
B
R
E
E
Z
E
W
A
Y
9
'
-
1
1
/
2
"
C
L
4
0
'
-
0
"
35
'
-
4
"
35' - 4"
35
'
-
4
"
35
'
-
4
"
49' - 0"10' - 4"
20
'
-
4
1
/
2
"
10
0
'
-
3
"
11' - 5"31' - 4"5' - 11 1/2"32' - 2 1/2"
7'
-
1
1
"
37
1
'
-
9
1
/
2
"
20' - 4"
158' - 6"40' - 2"34' - 2"
2' - 3"34' - 2"198' - 7 1/2"23' - 2 1/2"
2'
-
5
"
41
'
-
0
"
33
6
'
-
3
1
/
2
"
20' - 4"
21
'
-
4
"
1
9
'
-
8
"
11
9
'
-
9
"
27
'
-
0
"
12
0
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
69' - 6"
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
1 BED COMMUNITY / CLUB /REC ROOMSTAIR 02ELEVSTAIR 03
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
ST
A
I
R
0
4
STAIR 01BARarchitects901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:28:13
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 416036 A 12DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 422Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
1
A
2
0
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2 BED2 BED
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
3
B
E
D
3 BED 3 BED1 BED2 BED1 BED1 BED2 BED
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1 BED
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1 BED
1
B
E
D
J
R
TR
A
S
H
TRASH
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
23' - 2 1/2"4' - 5 1/2"203' - 2"27' - 4 1/2"136' - 3"14' - 3"
75
'
-
6
"
16' - 1"
3 8 ' - 2 1 /2"
1 1 4 ' - 6 1 /2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
6
6
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
2
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
1 8 ' - 1 1 /2"
6
9
'
-
4
"
13' - 10 1/2"75' - 1"12' - 10 1/2"
14
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
14
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
3
'
-
1
1
"
9
'
-
0
"
C
L
4
0
'
-
0
"
45' - 8"
94
'
-
4
"
75
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
20
'
-
5
"
10
0
'
-
2
"
11' - 5"31' - 4"5' - 11 1/2"32' - 2 1/2"
7'
-
1
1
"
37
1
'
-
9
1
/
2
"
20' - 4"
23' - 2 1/2"198' - 7 1/2"34' - 2"2' - 3"
158' - 6"40' - 2"34' - 2"
21
'
-
4
"
1
9
'
-
8
"
11
9
'
-
9
"
27
'
-
0
"
12
0
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
69' - 6"
2'
-
5
"
37
7
'
-
3
1
/
2
"
20' - 4"49' - 0"10' - 4"1 BED
ST
O
R
A
G
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
1+
B
E
D
STAIR 02ELEVSTAIR 03
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
ST
A
I
R
0
4
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:28:26
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 516036 A 13DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 423Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
1
A
2
0
RESIDENT LOUNGE
3
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1 BED2 BED2 BED
1
B
E
D
J
R
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
3 BED 2 BED1 BED1 BED2 BED
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1 BED
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1 BED
1
B
E
D
TR
A
S
H
TRASH
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
ID
F
27' - 8"196' - 0"34' - 6 1/2"109' - 8"14' - 3"16' - 1"
3 8 ' - 2 1 /2"
1 1 4 ' - 6 1 /2 "
1 0 ' - 0 "
6
6
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
2
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
6
9
'
-
4
"
OUTDOOR LOUNGE
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
3
'
-
1
1
"
9
'
-
0
"
PR
I
V
A
T
E
R
O
O
F
TE
R
R
A
C
E
56' - 0"56' - 0"
56
'
-
0
"
56' - 0"20' - 4"
20
'
-
4
1
/
2
"
10
0
'
-
3
"
11' - 5"31' - 4"5' - 11 1/2"32' - 3"7' - 2"41' - 10"10' - 0"144' - 2"
18
4
'
-
2
1
/
2
"
25' - 8"
12
0
'
-
0
1
/
2
"
31' - 4"32' - 10 1/2"5' - 4"
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
ELEV STAIR 02STAIR
ST
A
I
R
EL
E
V
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:28:38
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 616036 A 14DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 424Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
1
A
2
0
OPEN TO RESIDENT LOUNGE BELOW1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED1 BED3 BED3 BED
3
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
TR
A
S
H
TRASH
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
DS
DS
ID
F
PR
I
V
A
T
E
R
O
O
F
TE
R
R
A
C
E
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
OPEN TO DECK BELOW
B
R
I
D
G
E
B
E
L
O
W
4
'
-
0
"
6
6
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
2
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
4
'
-
0
"
6
9
'
-
4
"
4
'
-
0
"
6
9
'
-
4
"
4
'
-
0
"
4' - 0"64' - 2"4' - 1"31' - 10"191' - 10"34' - 6 1/2"31' - 4"32' - 10 1/2"64' - 2"26' - 7"
RO
O
F
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
ROOF OVERHANG ROOF OVERHANG
RO
O
F
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
PR
I
V
A
T
E
R
O
O
F
TE
R
R
A
C
E
C
L
4
0
'
-
0
"
66
'
-
4
"
66' - 4"56' - 0"
66
'
-
4
"
2' - 1"2' - 0"8' - 7 1/2"
2 ' - 0"
2 2 5 ' - 1 0 "
2 ' - 0"
18
4
'
-
2
1
/
2
"
25' - 8"1+ BED
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
EL
E
V
S
T
A
I
R
ELEV STAIR 02STAIR 03BARarchitects901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:28:49
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 716036 A 15DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 425Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
DN
SLOPESLOPE SLOPE
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S L O P E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
S L O P E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
SL
O
P
E
S L O P E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
SLOPE
S L O P E
SLOPE
S L O P E
SL
O
P
E
SLOPE SLOPESLOPESLOPESLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE SLOPE
SLOPE
S L O P E
SL
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S
L
O
P
E
S L O P E
1
A
2
0
OPEN TO BELOW
2
A
1
9
1
A
1
9
2
A
2
0
DA
S
H
E
D
L
I
N
E
I
N
D
I
C
A
T
E
S
A
R
E
A
DE
S
I
G
N
A
T
E
D
F
O
R
F
U
T
U
R
E
S
O
L
A
R
PA
N
E
L
S
(
1
0
%
O
F
R
O
O
F
A
R
E
A
M
I
N
.
)
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
M
E
T
A
L
SC
R
E
E
N
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
M
E
T
A
L
SC
R
E
E
N
DS
DS
DS DS DS
DS
DS
DS
B
E
L
O
W
DS
DSDSDSDS
DS
DS
B
E
L
O
W
DSDS
DS
BR
I
D
G
E
B
E
L
O
W
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
M
E
T
A
L
SC
R
E
E
N
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
M
E
T
A
L
SC
R
E
E
N
77' - 8"78' - 0"83' - 4"77' - 1"
DS
DS
DS
DS
DSDSDSDSDS
77
'
-
8
"
84
'
-
5
"
66
'
-
4
"
33
'
-
7
"
6' - 3"
2
9
'
-
7
"
7 ' - 6 "
94
'
-
4
"
6'
-
1
1
/
2
"
72
'
-
9
"
17
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
10
7
'
-
6
1
/
2
"
72' - 4"
7'
-
1
1
"
37
0
'
-
6
1
/
2
"
21' - 7"
2'
-
5
"
37
5
'
-
1
1
1
/
2
"
21' - 8"
41
'
-
0
"
11
9
'
-
9
"
23
'
-
1
0
"
72
'
-
9
1
/
2
"
46
'
-
3
1
/
2
"
72' - 4"21' - 1 1/2"204' - 7 1/2"32' - 5 1/2"
23' - 2 1/2"232' - 9 1/2"2' - 3"
11' - 1 1/2"23' - 0 1/2"40' - 2"158' - 6"
7
7
'
-
5
"
1
9
'
-
6
"
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:29:04
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"FLOOR PLAN - ROOF16036 A 16DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 426Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
LEVEL 1 334' - 0"LEVEL 2 347' - 0"LEVEL 3 359' - 0"LEVEL 4 369' - 4"LEVEL 5 379' - 8"LEVEL 6 390' - 0"LEVEL 7 400' - 4"ROOF 410' - 8"14' - 8"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"12' - 0"13' - 0"
1
6
2
15
13
7
1
7
3
2
PENTHOUSE ROOF 418' - 8"
EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
A
R
E
A
L
L
O
W
E
D
U
N
D
E
R
C
H
A
P
T
E
R
3
2
O
F
TH
E
2
0
1
6
C
B
C
20
1
6
C
B
C
3
2
0
2
.
3
.
3
E
N
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
O
R
M
O
R
E
F
E
E
T
AB
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
.
EN
C
R
O
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
1
5
F
E
E
T
(
4
5
7
2
M
M
)
O
R
MO
R
E
A
B
O
V
E
G
R
A
D
E
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
B
E
L
I
M
I
T
E
D
.
23' - 9"
4' - 4"MEASURED TO THE MIDPOINT OF SLOPED ROOF 56' - 0"25' - 0"81' - 0"
3
8
7156
1
LEVEL 1 334' - 0"LEVEL 2 347' - 0"LEVEL 3 359' - 0"LEVEL 4 369' - 4"LEVEL 5 379' - 8"LEVEL 6 390' - 0"LEVEL 7 400' - 4"ROOF 410' - 8"2
6
1
14' - 8"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"12' - 0"13' - 0"PENTHOUSE ROOF 418' - 8"MEASURED TO THE MIDPOINT OF SLOPED ROOF 56' - 0"25' - 0"81' - 0"
7
8
3
3
1
8
A
2
5
1
1
/
1
6
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
1
7
2
SO
U
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
1
/
1
6
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
1
7
1
WE
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:29:15
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - SOUTH & WEST16036 A 17DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'0
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
L
E
G
E
N
D
NO
.
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
1
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
2F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
A
N
E
L
3
T
I
L
E
O
R
T
H
I
N
S
E
T
M
A
S
O
N
R
Y
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
4
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
A
C
C
E
N
T
P
A
N
E
L
5
M
E
C
H
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
6
P
E
R
F
O
R
A
T
E
D
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
7G
L
A
Z
I
N
G
8
P
E
R
F
O
R
A
T
E
D
M
E
TA
L
B
A
L
U
S
T
R
A
D
E
9
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
10
G
L
A
Z
E
D
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
D
O
O
R
11
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
Y
S
T
E
M
12
M
T
L
P
A
N
E
L
13
D
E
C
O
R
T
I
V
E
M
E
T
A
L
F
I
N
14
C
A
N
O
P
Y
15
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
L
A
P
S
I
D
I
N
G
16
M
E
T
A
L
S
U
N
S
H
A
D
E
17
V
I
N
Y
L
W
I
N
D
O
W
18
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
19
J
U
L
I
E
T
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
20
S
T
E
E
L
B
R
I
D
G
E
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 427Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
LEVEL 1 334' - 0"LEVEL 2 347' - 0"LEVEL 3 359' - 0"LEVEL 4 369' - 4"LEVEL 5 379' - 8"LEVEL 6 390' - 0"LEVEL 7 400' - 4"
15
2
2
8
15
7
2
7
8
6
14' - 8"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"12' - 0"13' - 0"MEASURED TO THE MIDPOINT OF SLOPED ROOF 56' - 0"25' - 0"81' - 0"6 LEVEL 1 334' - 0"LEVEL 2 347' - 0"LEVEL 3 359' - 0"LEVEL 4 369' - 4"LEVEL 5 379' - 8"LEVEL 6 390' - 0"LEVEL 7 400' - 4"ROOF 410' - 8"18
5
3
7
15
2
7
8
7
8
8
7
2
8
15
3
PENTHOUSE ROOF 418' - 8"MEASURED TO THE MIDPOINT OF SLOPED ROOF 13' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"14' - 8"25' - 0"56' - 0"81' - 0"
2
5
5
A
2
5
2
1
/
1
6
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
1
8
2
EA
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
1
/
1
6
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
1
8
1
NO
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:29:24
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - NORTH & EAST16036 A 18DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 8'16'32'64'48'0
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
L
E
G
E
N
D
NO
.
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
1
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
2
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
P
A
N
E
L
3
T
I
L
E
O
R
T
H
I
N
S
E
T
M
A
S
O
N
R
Y
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
4
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
A
C
C
E
N
T
P
A
N
E
L
5
M
E
C
H
A
N
C
I
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
6
P
E
R
F
O
R
A
T
E
D
M
E
T
A
L
S
C
R
E
E
N
7G
L
A
Z
I
N
G
8
P
E
R
F
O
R
A
T
E
D
M
E
T
A
L
B
A
L
U
S
T
R
A
D
E
9
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
10
G
L
A
Z
E
D
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
D
O
O
R
11
S
T
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
Y
S
T
E
M
12
M
T
L
P
A
N
E
L
13
D
E
C
O
R
T
I
V
E
M
E
T
A
L
F
I
N
14
C
A
N
O
P
Y
15
F
I
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
L
A
P
S
I
D
I
N
G
16
M
E
T
A
L
S
U
N
S
H
A
D
E
17
V
I
N
Y
L
W
I
N
D
O
W
18
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
19
J
U
L
I
E
T
B
A
L
C
O
N
Y
20
S
T
E
E
L
B
R
I
D
G
E
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 428Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
LEVEL 1 334' - 0"LEVEL 2 347' - 0"LEVEL 3 359' - 0"LEVEL 4 369' - 4"LEVEL 5 379' - 8"LEVEL 6 390' - 0"LEVEL 7 400' - 4"
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2 BED 2 BED 2 BED
GA
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
14' - 8"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"12' - 0"13' - 0"PROPERTY LINE CAMPBELL LN
PROPERTY LINE
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
MEASURED TO THE MIDPOINT OF SLOPED ROOF 56' - 0"25' - 0"81' - 0"LEVEL 1 334' - 0"LEVEL 2 347' - 0"LEVEL 3 359' - 0"LEVEL 4 369' - 4"LEVEL 5 379' - 8"LEVEL 6 390' - 0"LEVEL 7 400' - 4"
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
GA
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
ME
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
EN
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
PROPERTY LINE CAMPBELL LN
PROPERTY LINE
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
14' - 8"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"12' - 0"13' - 0"MEASURED TO THE MIDPOINT OF SLOPED ROOF 56' - 0"25' - 0"81' - 0"BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:29:31
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"BUILDING SECTIONS -NORTH/SOUTH16036 A 19DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
1
/
1
6
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
1
9
2
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
N
O
R
T
H
/
S
O
U
T
H
1
/
1
6
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
1
9
1
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
N
O
R
T
H
/
S
O
U
T
H
8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 429Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
LEVEL 1 334' - 0"LEVEL 2 347' - 0"LEVEL 3 359' - 0"LEVEL 4 369' - 4"LEVEL 5 379' - 8"LEVEL 6 390' - 0"LEVEL 7 400' - 4"
GA
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
3
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1+
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
14' - 8"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"12' - 0"13' - 0"RESIDENT LOUNGE 3 BED 3 BEDCOMMUNITY / CLUB /REC ROOM LOBBY1 BEDPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
DE MARCUS BVLD
CAMPBELL LN
MEASURED TO THE MIDPOINT OF SLOPED ROOF 56' - 0"25' - 0"81' - 0"3 BED LEVEL 1 334' - 0"LEVEL 2 347' - 0"LEVEL 3 359' - 0"LEVEL 4 369' - 4"LEVEL 5 379' - 8"LEVEL 6 390' - 0"LEVEL 7 400' - 4"
BO
I
L
E
R
RO
O
M
BI
K
E
ST
O
R
A
G
E
GARAGE GARAGE
GA
R
A
G
E
GA
R
A
G
E
ST
O
R
A
G
E
FITNESS2 BED2 BED2 BED2 BED2 BED3 BED1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
1
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
2
B
E
D
14' - 8"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"12' - 0"13' - 0"PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
DE MARCUS BVLD
CAMPBELL LN
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
1
B
E
D
J
R
10' - 4"7' - 10"10"
59' - 0"
56' - 0"25' - 0"81' - 0"MEASURED TO THE MIDPOINT OF SLOPED ROOFBARarchitects901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:29:36
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/16" = 1'-0"BUILDING SECTIONS -EAST/WEST16036 A 20DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
1
/
1
6
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
2
0
2
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
E
A
S
T
/
W
E
S
T
1
/
1
6
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
2
0
1
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
E
A
S
T
/
W
E
S
T
8'16'32'64'48'005.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 430Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
K W/D
WS
DW REF
VL
K
L
K
W/D
WS
DW REF
V
L
L
K
L L
W/
D
V
WS
Q
DW REF
W/D
Q V
DW REF
L
1
B
E
D
70
7
S
F
BEDROOM
LI
V
I
N
G
DI
N
I
N
G
KITCHEN
EN
T
R
Y
BATHROOMCLOSET
2
B
E
D
99
0
S
F
LI
V
I
N
G
DI
N
I
N
G
KITCHEN
EN
T
R
Y
CL
O
S
E
T
BE
D
R
O
O
M
1
MA
S
T
E
R
BE
D
R
O
O
M
CL
O
S
E
T
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
3
B
E
D
11
8
0
S
F
LI
V
I
N
G
KITCHEN
DI
N
I
N
G
DE
N
/
O
F
F
I
C
E
BE
D
R
O
O
M
2
MA
S
T
E
R
BE
D
R
O
O
M
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
BA
T
H
R
O
O
M
CLOSET
CL
O
S
E
T
EN
T
R
Y
CL
O
S
E
T
1
B
E
D
J
R
56
0
S
F
KITCHEN
ENTRY
DI
N
I
N
G
BATHROOMBEDROOMLIVINGBARarchitects901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:29:43
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
1/4" = 1'-0"ENLARGED TYPICAL UNIT PLANS16036 A 21DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
2
1
2
TY
P
.
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
2
1
3
TY
P
.
2
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
2
1
4
TY
P
.
3
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
2'4'8'16'12'0
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
2
1
1
TY
P
.
J
R
.
1
B
E
D
R
O
O
M
U
N
I
T
05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 431Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:29:47
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
GREENPOINT CHECKLIST16036 A 22DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 432Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:29:50
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
GREENPOINT CHECKLIST16036 A 23DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 433Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:29:53
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
GREENPOINT CHECKLIST16036 A 24DUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD 05.24.17ENTITLEMENTS 08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 434Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
F.O.S.
F.O.S.
FD
B
-
c
c
-
0
0
6
ST
U
C
C
O
R
E
T
U
R
N
NA
I
L
F
I
N
W
I
N
D
O
W
WD
.
F
R
A
M
I
N
G
,
S
S
D
.
DR
A
I
N
A
G
E
M
A
T
SE
A
L
A
N
T
&
B
A
C
K
E
R
R
O
D
SI
L
L
B
E
L
O
W
ST
U
C
C
O
LEVEL 1 334' - 0"LEVEL 2 347' - 0"LEVEL 3 359' - 0"LEVEL 4 369' - 4"LEVEL 5 379' - 8"LEVEL 6 390' - 0"4 A 25SIM.THINSET TILE CEMENT PLASTER COLOR O2WIN FRAME COLOR O1 PERFORATED METAL BALUSTRADE PERFORATED METAL SCREEN CEMENT PLASTER COLOR O2
LE
V
E
L
1
33
4
'
-
0
"
LE
V
E
L
2
34
7
'
-
0
"
LE
V
E
L
3
35
9
'
-
0
"
LE
V
E
L
4
36
9
'
-
4
"
LE
V
E
L
5
37
9
'
-
8
"
LE
V
E
L
6
39
0
'
-
0
"
LE
V
E
L
7
40
0
'
-
4
"
FI
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
LA
P
S
I
D
I
N
G
WI
N
F
R
A
M
E
CO
L
O
R
O
2
BARarchitects 901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:30:01
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
As indicatedAPPENDIX16036 A 25AuthorCheckerDUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
3
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
2
5
4
TY
P
I
C
A
L
R
E
C
E
S
S
E
D
W
I
N
D
O
W
J
A
M
B
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
2
5
1
EN
L
A
R
G
E
D
W
E
S
T
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
0
2
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
2
5
2
EN
L
A
R
G
E
D
N
O
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 435Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
COLOR 04
CO
L
O
R
0
2
C
O
L
O
R
0
3
COLOR 05
CO
L
O
R
0
1
W
I
N
C
O
L
O
R
0
1
W
I
N
C
O
L
O
R
0
1
W
I
N
C
O
L
O
R
0
2
WIN COLOR 02 STOREFRONT COLORBARarchitects901 Battery Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94111 415 293 5700 www.bararch.com
cBAR C O P Y R I G H T architects
DRAWNBY C PHECKEDBYROJECTNO DATEISSUEDRACPHERODA SCALE:DUBLIN, CA SITE A-3
8/28/2017 4:31:18
PM
BIM 360://004-17009 Dublin CA/UDR DUBLIN-A.rvt
As indicatedBUILDING MATERIALS16036 P 01RV/MS PCDUBLIN STATION DEMARCUS BOULEVARD
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
CO
L
O
R
S
FIBER CEMENT PANEL
CE
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
FI
B
E
R
C
E
M
E
N
T
S
I
D
I
N
G
08.29.17ENT RESUBMITTAL6.1.d Packet Pg. 436Attachment: 4. Exhibit A to City Council Resolution - Site Development Review and Tentative Map (Ashton at Dublin Station (Transit Center Site A-3))
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Tuesday, November 14, 2017
Planning Commission October 24, 2017
Regular Meeting Page | 1
A Regular Meeting of the Dublin Planning Commission was held on Tuesday,
November 14, 2017, in the City Council Chamber. The meeting was called to order at
7:00 PM., by Commission Chair Mittan.
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
At tendee Name Title Status
Scott Mittan Commission Chair Present
T ara Bhuthim ethee Commission Vice Chair Present
Am it Kothari Planning Comm issioner Present
Sam ir Qureshi Planning Comm issioner Present
Stephen W right Planning Comm issioner Present
2. Oral Communications
2.1. Public Comment
No public comments were made.
3. Consent Calendar
3.1. Approve the Minutes of the October 24, 2017 Planning Commission
Meeting.
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVED BY: Stephen Wright, Planning Commissioner
SECOND: Scott Mittan, Commission Chair
AYES: Bhuthimethee, Kothari, Qureshi
3. Written Communication - None.
4. Public Hearing
5.1. Transit Center Site A-3 Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 2
Development Plan, Site Development Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437
(PLPA 2017-00036)
6.1.e
Packet Pg. 437
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
D
r
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
Planning Commission October 24, 2017
Regular Meeting Page | 2
Martha Battaglia, Associate Planner, made a presentation and responded to
questions posed by the Commission.
Commission Chair Mittan opened the public hearing.
David Israel, Architect with BAR Architects, made a presentation on behalf of the
Applicant and responded to questions posed by the Commission.
David Fletcher, Landscape Architect with Fletcher Studio, made a presentation
on behalf of the Applicant and responded to questions posed by the Commission.
Erik Steiner, Senior Development Associate with UDR, INC., responded to
questions posed by the Commission on behalf of the Applicant.
Stuart Cook, Alameda County Surplus Authority, provided public comment.
Savinder Juneja, Dublin Resident, provided public comment.
Marie Marshall, Dublin Resident, provided public comment.
Marlene Massetti, Dublin Resident, provided public comment.
Yash Kunaraswamy, Dublin Resident, provided public comment.
Anthony Cataldo, Dublin Resident, provided public comment.
Megan Jennings, Attorney for the Applicant, made a presentation and responded
to public comments and questions posed by the Commission.
David Israel, Architect from BAR Architects, responded to Public comments and
questions posed by the Commission.
Martha Battaglia, Associate Planner, responded to questions posed by the
Commission.
Tim Cremin, Assistant City Attorney, responded to questions posed by the
Commission.
The Planning Commission provided comments on the project.
On motion of Commissioner Kothari, seconded by Commissioner Bhuthimethee,
and by unanimous vote, the Commission adopted:
6.1.e
Packet Pg. 438
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
D
r
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
Planning Commission October 24, 2017
Regular Meeting Page | 3
RESOLUTION NO. 17-12
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE
APPROVING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE AND RELATED STAGE 2
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA 2017-00036
On motion of Commissioner Kothari, Seconded by Commissioner Bhuthimethee,
and by unanimous vote, the Commission Adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 17-13
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT FOR THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3
PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
(PLPA-2017-00036)
On Motion of Commissioner Quereshi, Seconded by Commissioner
Bhuthimethee, and by a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Wright voting No), and the
Commission Adopted:
RESOLUTION NO. 17-14
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
TENTATIVE MAP 8437 FOR THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3 PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
(PLPA-2017-00036)
5. Unfinished Business - None.
6. New Business - None.
8. Other Business – Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff,
including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at
City expense (AB1234).
Commissioner Wright and Commission Chair Mittan requested Staff provide
higher quality drawings and three-dimensional drawings on development
projects.
6.1.e
Packet Pg. 439
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
D
r
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
Planning Commission October 24, 2017
Regular Meeting Page | 4
Jeff Baker, Assistant Community Development Director, clarified that the
applicant, not the City, produces the documents. Mr. Baker stated that applicants
are presenting based on industry standard and that could vary depending on the
software programs and various formats utilized by Applicants. Mr. Baker stated
that Staff will work with applicants on the quality of their submittal package to
ensure the best practices, tools and resources are being utilized for future
submissions.
9. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned by Commission Chair Mittan at 9:46 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
Jeff Baker
Assistant Community Development Director
6.1.e
Packet Pg. 440
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
5
.
D
r
a
f
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
d
a
t
e
d
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
4
,
2
0
1
7
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 441
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 442
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 443
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 444
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 445
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 446
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 447
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 448
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 449
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 450
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 451
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 452
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 453
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 454
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 455
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
6.1.f
Packet Pg. 456
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
6
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
1
RESOLUTION NO. 17 - 12
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE AND RELATED STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3
APN: 986-0034-009-00
PLPA 2017-00036
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing to construct a
residential project comprised of 220 units, residential amenities including a fitness center, pool,
roof top lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parking on an approximately 2.36-acre site
located on Site A-3 in the Dublin Transit Center. The proposed development and applications
are collectively known as the “Project”; and
WHEREAS, the applications include Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage
2 Development Plan, Site Development Review Permit, and Tentative Map 8437; and
WHEREAS, the project Site is located at the northwest corner of Campbell Lane and
DeMarcus Boulevard within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, and more specifically within
the Dublin Transit Center; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State
CEQA Guidelines and City environmental regulations require that certain projects be reviewed
for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. To comply with
CEQA, the City prepared a CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommends that the project be found exempt from CEQA pursuant to
Government Code 65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan. The
project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Transit
Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned
Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395)
which was certified by the City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The
CEQA analysis prepared for the project determined that no event as specified in Section 21166
of the Public Recourses Code has occurred since the certification of the Dublin Transit Specific
Plan EIR that requires preparation of a Supplemental CEQA document; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated November 14, 2017 was submitted to the Planning
Commission recommending City Council approval of the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on the
project on November 14, 2017, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be
heard; and
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 457
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
-
1
2
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
d
o
p
t
a
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and use its independent judgement and
considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth prior to
making its recommendation on the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct
and made a part of this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council find the project exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code 65457 and adopt the
Ordinance attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, which Ordinance
Rezones the Transit Center Site A-3 project site to Planned Development and approves a
related Stage 2 Development Plan . The Planning Commission recommendation is based on the
Staff Report analysis and recommendation and on the findings set forth in the attached draft
Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November 2017, by the
following votes:
AYES: Mittan, Bhuthimethee, Kothari, Qureshi, Wright
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Assistant Community Development Director
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036 Parcel A-3 Stage 2 PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\7. PC Reso 17-12 recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance Rezoning
the Dublin Transit Center Site A-3.DOC
6.1.g
Packet Pg. 458
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
-
1
2
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
d
o
p
t
a
n
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
RESOLUTION NO. 17 - 13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A
SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PERMIT FOR THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3 PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
(PLPA-2017-00036)
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing to construct a
residential project comprised of 220 units, residential amenities including a fitness center, pool,
roof top lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parking on an approximately 2.36-acre site
located on Site A-3 in the Dublin Transit Center. The proposed development and applications
are collectively known as the “Project”; and
WHEREAS, the applications include a Planned Development Rezone with a related
Stage 2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and Tentative Map 8437; and
WHEREAS, the project Site is located at the northwest corner of Campbell Lane and
DeMarcus Boulevard within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, and more specifically within
the Dublin Transit Center; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State
guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that certain projects be reviewed for
environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. To comply with CEQA,
the City prepared a CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommends that the project be found exempt from CEQA pursuant to
Government Code 65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan. The
project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Transit
Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned
Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395)
which was certified by the City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The
CEQA analysis prepared for the project determined that no event as specified in Section 21166
of the Public Recourses Code has occurred since the certification of the Dublin Transit Specific
Plan EIR that requires preparation of a Supplemental CEQA document; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report dated November 14, 2017, was submitted to the Planning
Commission recommending City Council approval of the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on
November 14, 2017, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said hearing was given in all respects as required by law;
and
6.1.h
Packet Pg. 459
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
8
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
-
1
3
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
f
o
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and use its independent judgement and
considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth prior to
making its recommendation on the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the foregoing recitals are true and correct
and made a part of this Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of
the City of Dublin, based on the findings in the attached Resolution, recommends that the City
Council find the project exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code 65457 and adopt the
Resolution attached as Exhibit A, which Resolution approves the Site Development Review
Permit.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November 2017 by the following
vote:
AYES: Mittan, Bhuthimethee, Kothari, Qureshi, Wright
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
________
Assistant Community Development Director
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036 Parcel A-3 Stage 2 PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\CC Attachments\8. PC Resolution 17-13 recommending that the
City Council approve the SDR for Site A-3.doc
6.1.h
Packet Pg. 460
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
8
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
-
1
3
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
S
i
t
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
f
o
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
RESOLUTION NO. 17 - 14
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
TENTATIVE MAP 8437 FOR THE TRANSIT CENTER SITE A-3 PROJECT
APN: 986-0034-009-00
(PLPA-2017-00036)
WHEREAS, the Applicant, Ashton at Dublin Station, is proposing to construct a
residential project comprised of 220 units, residential amenities including a fitness center, pool,
roof top lounge, and 331 spaces of structured parking on an approximately 2.36-acre site
located on Site A-3 in the Dublin Transit Center. The proposed development and applications
are collectively known as the “Project”; and
WHEREAS, the applications include Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage
2 Development Plan, Site Development Review, and Tentative Map 8437; and
WHEREAS, the project Site is located at the northwest corner of Campbell Lane and
DeMarcus Boulevard within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, and more specifically within
the Dublin Transit Center; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State
guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that certain projects be reviewed for
environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. To comply with CEQA,
the City prepared a CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommends that the project be found exempt from CEQA pursuant to
Government Code 65457 for residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan. The
project is within the scope of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Dublin Transit
Center General Plan Amendment, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Stage 1 Planned
Development Zoning, Tentative Parcel Map, and Development Agreement (SCH 2001120395)
which was certified by the City Council Resolution No. 215-02 dated November 19, 2002. The
CEQA analysis prepared for the project determined that no event as specified in Section 21166
of the Public Recourses Code has occurred since the certification of the Dublin Transit Specific
Plan EIR that requires preparation of a Supplemental CEQA document; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report dated November 14, 2017, was submitted to the Planning
Commission recommending City Council approval of the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on
November 14, 2017, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said hearing was given in all respects as required by law;
and
6.1.i
Packet Pg. 461
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
-
1
4
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
f
o
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and use its independent judgement and
considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth prior to
making its recommendation on the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the foregoing recitals are true and correct
and made a part of this Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of
the City of Dublin, based on the findings in the attached Resolution, recommends that the City
Council find the project exempt from CEQA pursuant to Government Code 65457 and adopt the
Resolution attached as Exhibit A, which Resolution approves the Tentative Map 8437.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November 2017 by the following
vote:
AYES: Mittan, Bhuthimethee, Kothari, Qureshi,
NOES: Wright
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
________
Assistant Community Development Director
G:\PA\2017\PLPA-2017-00036 Parcel A-3 Stage 2 PD Zoning, SDR, TMAP\CC Hearing 12.5.17\CC Attachments\9. PC Reso 17-17 recommending that the City
Council approve theTentative Map for Site A-3.doc
6.1.i
Packet Pg. 462
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
9
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
1
7
-
1
4
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
T
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
p
f
o
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
Ashton at Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of Specific Plan Exemption
November 8, 2017
Planning Application Number: PLPA-2017-00036
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 463
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton at Dublin Station Addendum
| Page 1
11/8/17
Ashton at Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of Specific Plan Exemption
PLPA-2017-00036
November 8, 2017
The proposed project (Ashton at Dublin Station) includes the construction of a 220-unit multi-
family residential development on a 2.36-acre (net) site located on the northwest of the corner
of DeMarcus Boulevard and Campbell Lane in the City of Dublin (commonly referred to as Site
A-3). At its tallest point, the building is five stories over two levels of parking (seven stories
total). The proposed project meets the parking requirement of 1.5 spaces per unit as it
proposes to provide 331 parking spaces on-site within a parking garage.
The project site is located in the Dublin Transit Center, as well as the Transit Village Center
subarea of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) area. The proposed project is part of the
pre-existing entitlements defined in the 2002 Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Planned
Development (PD) Rezone and General Plan/Specific Plan amendment. The project requires
approval of a Stage 2 Planned Development Zoning, a Tentative Tract Map, and a Site
Development Review Permit.
The Dublin Transit Center requires 15% of the residential units be affordable units. The Camellia
Place apartment project on Site A-2 has been used to satisfy the very low and low portion of
the inclusionary housing requirement for the project. Ten percent (10%) of the units in the
proposed project are required to be affordable to moderate income households earning
between 80% and 120% of the area median income adjusted for actual household size. The
project proposes to set aside 10% of the 220 units (22 units) for moderate income households.
Prior CEQA Analysis
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin Transit Center Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by the City Council
on November 19, 2002, by City Council Resolution No. 215-02. This EIR analyzed amendments
to the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP), a Stage 1 Planned
Development Zoning, a Parcel Map and a Development Agreement.
The EIR contains mitigation measures that will be applied to any development within the project
area, including the proposed project. Specific mitigation measures are noted in the Initial Study
for the proposed project. The EIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts with respect to
project exceedances of Bay Area Air Quality Management District air quality standards on a
project and cumulative level, cumulative traffic impacts , and impacts to mainline freeway
segments.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 464
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton at Dublin Station Addendum
| Page 2
11/8/17
The project qualifies for a statutory exemption from CEQA under Gov’t Code section 65457 for
residential projects that are consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been certified
(Exemption). The Exemption states:
“(a) Any residential development project, including any subdivision, or any zoning change
that is undertaken to implement and is consistent with a specific plan for which an
environmental impact report has been certified after January 1, 1980, is exempt from the
requirements of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources
Code. However, if after adoption of the specific plan, an event as specified in Section
21166 of the Public Resources Code occurs, the exemption provided by this subdivision
does not apply unless and unt il a supplemental environmental impact report for the
specific plan is prepared and certified in accordance with the provisions of Division 13
(commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code. After a supplemental
environmental impact report is certified, the exemption specified in this subdivision
applies to projects undertaken pursuant to the specific plan.”
The City has relied on this Exemption for CEQA compliance for all other residential projects
within the Transit Specific Plan area. This document addresses the component of the
Exemption of whether an event as specified in Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code has
occurred since the certification of the Dublin Transit Center EIR that requires preparation of a
supplemental CEQA document (EIR or MND).
Existing Entitlements
Sites A, B and C comprise the portion of area of the Dublin Transit Center designated as
residential. They all have the GP/EDSP land use designation of High Density Residential except
for Site A-1, which is designated Medium-High Density Residential. A total of 1,500 units are
allocated to sites A, B and C and the proposed project represents the last residential
development project within these sites of the Dublin Transit Center project area.
As shown in Table A-1: Dublin Transit Center Development & Entitlements, the total number of
units constructed in Site A, including the proposed project, would be 384 units, 46 units less
than the 430 units allocated . Per the Dublin Transit Center EIR, the total number of residential
units constructed in Site A, B and C, including the proposed project, would be 1,451 units, 49
units less than the total allocation of 1,500 units.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 465
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton at Dublin Station Addendum
| Page 3
11/8/17
Table A-1: Dublin Transit Center Development & Entitlem ents
Site
Units
Constructed/Proposed
Units Permitted 1
Difference
Site A 2 384 430 (46)
Site B 562 565 (3)
Site C 505 505 0
Total 1,451 1,500 (49)
Notes:
1. Per Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan, as amended.
2. Includes proposed project.
The proposed project would not exceed the allocation of residential units envisioned for Site A,
nor the overall units allocated to Site A, B and C under the Dublin Transit Center project (1500),
and is therefore consistent with the development plans as analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center
EIR.
Proposed CEQA Analysis in this Document
As stated above, the City of Dublin has determined that the project qualifies for a statutory
exemption from CEQA under Gov’t Code section 65457. The proposed project is consistent
with the general plan land use designation for Site A-3 and is similar in unit count to the Dublin
Transit Center Specific Plan. An EIR has been certified for the Dublin Transit Center Specific
Plan. This document finds that no event as specified in Section 21166 of the Public Resources
Code has occurred since the certification of the Dublin Transit Center Specific Plan EIR that
requires preparation of a supplemental CEQA document (EIR or MND).
Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 identify the
conditions requiring subsequent environmental review. After a review of these conditions, the
City has determined that no subsequent EIR or negat ive declaration is required for this project.
This is based on the following analysis:
a) Are there substantial changes to the project requiring major revisions to the EIR due
to new or substantially more severe significant impacts than previously identified?
There are no substantial changes to the project analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center
EIR. As demonstrated in the attached document, the proposed land uses on the project
site are not a substantial change to those previously proposed and analyzed, and will
not result in additional significant impacts, and no additional or different mitigation
measures are required. This is documented in the attached analysis.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 466
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton at Dublin Station Addendum
| Page 4
11/8/17
b) Are there substantial changes in the conditions which the project is undertaken
requiring major revisions to the EIR due to new or substantially more severe
significant impacts than previously identified?
There are no substantial changes in the conditions assumed in previous CEQA analysis
involving new or substantially more severe significant impacts than previously
identified. This is documented in the attached analysis.
c) Is there new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could
not have been known at the time of the previous EIR was complete that shows the
project will have a significant effect not addressed in the previous EIR; or previous
effects are more severe; or, previously infeasible mitigation measures or alternatives
are now feasible but the Applicant declined to adopt them; or mitigation measures or
alternatives considerably different from those in the previous EIR would substantially
reduce significant effects but the Applicant declines to adopt them?
As documented in the attached analysis, there is no new information showing a new or
more severe significant effect beyond those identified in the prior CEQA document .
Similarly, there are no new or different feasible mitigation measures or alternatives to
reduce significant effects of the project which the Applicant declines to adopt. All
previously adopted mitigations continue to apply to the project. The CEQA document
adequately describes the impacts and mitigations associated with the proposed project.
d) Should a subsequent EIR or negative declaration be prepared?
No subsequent EIR, Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is required
because there are no impacts, significant or otherwise, of the project beyond those
identified in the previous CEQA analysis, as documented in the attached analysis.
Conclusion
The attached document determines that the proposed Project and its impacts were previously
analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center Specific Plan EIR and none of the standards for a
subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration under CEQA Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections
15162 and 15163 are met. Therefore, the CEQA exemption under Government Code section
665457 applies to the project.
The attached document, the Dublin Transit Center EIR, and all resolutions cited above are
incorporated herein by reference and are available for public review during normal business
hours in the Community Development Department, Dublin City Hall, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin , CA.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 467
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
Ashton at Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of Specific Plan Exemption
November 8, 2017
Planning Application Number: PLPA-2017-00036
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 468
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page i
Table of Contents
Background & Project Description 1
Environmental Analysis 7
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Vicinity and Location
Figure 2: Dublin Transit Center Land Use Plan
Figure 3: Aerial Perspective
Figure 4a: Level 1 Floor Plan
Figure 4b: Level 3 Floor Plan
Figure 4c: Level 6 Floor Plan
Figure 5a: View From Southeast Corner – Campbell Lane and DeMarcus Boulevard
Figure 5b: View From Southwest Corner – Campbell Lane
Figure 5c: View From Northwest Corner – Campbell Lane
Figure 5d: View From Northeast Corner – DeMarcus Boulevard
Figure 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan
Figure 7: Preliminary Grading Plan
Figure 8: Preliminary Utility Plan
Figure 9: Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan
Figure 10: Preliminary Erosion Control Plan
Figure 11: Fault Trench Locations
Figure 12: Flood Hazard Area
Note: All figures are included at the end of the document.
List of Tables
Table 1: Dublin Transit Center Development & Entitlements
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 469
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 1
Ashton at Dublin Station
Background & Project Description
Project Title
Ashton at Dublin Station
Lead Agency
City of Dublin
Community Development Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Contact
Martha Battaglia
Associate Planner
Phone: 925-452-2152
martha.battaglia@dublin.ca.gov
Project Location & Setting
The project site (APN 986-0034-009-00) is located in eastern Dublin, bounded by Campbell Lane
to the west and south, DeMarcus Boulevard to the east, and a proposed shared private drive to
the north (just south of Dublin Boulevard). See Figure 1: Project Vicinity and Location.
The project site is paved and has previously been used as a parking lot and a construction
staging site.
Project Applicant
Ashton at Dublin Station, LLC
1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200
Highlands Ranch, CO 80129
General Plan Designation
High Density Residential
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 470
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 2
Zoning
PD Planned Development (PA 00-013/ORD. 21-02)
Project Description
The project Applicant has applied for a Planned Development Zoning Stage 2 Development Plan
Site Development Review Permit (SDR), and Tentative Map. Figures illustrating the proposed
project are shown at the end of this document and are referenced therein.
The 2.36-acre project site is bounded by DeMarcus Boulevard to the east, Campbell Lane to the
south and west, and a private through-block drive to the north. The Iron Horse Regional Trail
runs northwest to southeast next to the project site's southwest corner. Currently, the project
site is paved with minimal topographical change other than slight slopes for drainage .
Residential developments surround the project site to the west, north and east. A BART surface
parking lot and a PG&E electrical power substation is located across Campbell Lane to the
south.
As shown in Figure 2: Dublin Transit Center Land Use Plan , the project site is located within the
91-acre district known as the Dublin Transit Center. The Transit Center project includes the
development of a high-density mixed-use, transit and pedestrian-oriented development
adjacent to the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. On-going development has included
removing most of the existing BART surface parking lots. Future construction of new land uses
includes up to two million square feet of office space, a maximum of 1,500 medium-high and
high-density residential dwellings, and up to 70,000 square feet of ancillary retail commercial
uses. A five-story BART parking garage containing 1,700 spaces has been constructed adjacent
to Interstate 580 (I-580).
The proposed project would add a new 220-unit residential development project with
associated streetscape improvements to the Transit Center. The project site is located five
minutes’ walk from BART, with the main entry and entry plaza located at the project site's
southeast corner to encourage direct pedestrian circulation to both public transit and the
nearby Campbell Green park.
As shown in Table 1: Dublin Transit Center Development & Entitlements , the total number of
units constructed in Site A, including the proposed project, would be 384 units, 46 units less
than the 430 units allocated . The total number of units constructed within Sites A, B and C of
the Dublin Transit Center project area, including the proposed project, would be 1,451 units, 49
units less than the total allocation of 1,500 units.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 471
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 3
Table 1: Dublin Transit Center Development & Entitlements
Site
Units
Constructed/Proposed
Units Permitted 1
Difference
Site A 2 384 430 (46)
Site B 562 565 (3)
Site C 505 505 0
Total 1,451 1,500 (49)
Notes:
1. Per Dublin Transit Center Stage 1 Development Plan, as amended.
2. Includes proposed project.
As shown in Table 1, the proposed project would not exceed the allocation of residential units
envisioned for Site A, nor the greater Dublin Transit Center project, and is therefore consistent
with the development plans as analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Building Program and Design
As shown in Figure 3: Aerial Perspective, the proposed gross building area is 404,765 square
feet, with +/- 80% lot coverage. It includes 220 residential units and a two-level podium parking
garage. Residential units will be constructed on five floors over the garage. Residential units
will also be constructed on the north and east sides of the first two levels, surrounding the
internal parking structure.
In addition to residential units and associated support areas, the project includes private
amenity spaces; including two building lobbies, two podium level roof courtyards and a
swimming pool, and a level six private community room and outdoor roof terrace.
Figure 4a, b, and c show the floor plans for levels 1, 3 and 6.
The parking garage will accommodate 331 cars. The parking ratio will equal or exceed the City
required 1.5 parking spaces per residential unit . Fifty spaces are designated as visitor spaces.
Six ADA compliant accessible car spaces and one ADA van space are located on the ground
floor.
The Dublin Transit Center requires 15% of the residential units be affordable units. The Camellia
Place apartment project on Site A-2 has been used to satisfy the very low and low portion of
the inclusionary housing requirement for the project. Ten percent (10%) of the units in the
proposed project are required to be set aside for moderate income households. The project
proposes to set aside 10% of the 220 units (22 units) for moderate income households. A
moderate-income household is defined by the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance as households
earning between 80% and 120% of the area median income.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 472
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 4
As shown in Figure 2: Dublin Transit Center Land Use Plan, the project site is surrounded on
three sides by medium-high and high-density housing projects at a range of heights. These
include:
▪ Site A-1 (Tribeca) – a three-story 52-unit medium-density residential project to the west
of Campbell Lane
▪ Site A-2 (Camellia Place) – a four-story (three-story over one level of parking) 112-unit
high-density residential project to the north .
▪ Site B-1 (Elan at Dublin Station) – a seven story (five-story over two levels of parking)
257- unit high-density residential project located east DeMarcus Boulevard.
▪ Site B-2 (Eclipse at Dublin Station) – a five story 305-unit high-density residential
project located on Dublin Boulevard.
▪ Site C-1 (Avalon Dublin Station) – a five-story 505-unit high-density residential project
located east DeMarcus Boulevard and south of Campbell Green Park.
These residential buildings include a variety of façade materials and colors, and include roof
forms ranging from shallow hipped to flat . The developments to the north and west of the
project site include stoops and direct street entries to some ground floor units.
The proposed project massing is consistent with the scale of the adjacent buildings, with the
tallest masses located at the east side of the project site opposite the adjacent buildings along
the east side of DeMarcus Boulevard (Elan and Avalon projects), and the lowest masses located
on the west side of the project site opposite the lower height townhouses across Campbell
Lane (Tribeca). The proposed building height range from three- to five-stories over a two-story
podium for a maximum of seven stories, and 81-feet in height.
The project's two story parking podium is wrapped on the north and east sides by residential
units and other functional sp aces. To the south, the two parking levels are visually integrated
with three levels of residential units above. To the west, in response to the low-scale
residential buildings west across Campbell Lane, most of the residential mass above parking is
set back five feet. Along the project's north side, there are residential units at the ground level
with unit entries and stoops to enhance the residential scale and character established by the
Camellia Place project across the street.
The project includes a variety of windows, exterior materials, and colors. Facade treatments
include stucco, fiber cement and metal accent and infill panels, painted metal window
surrounds, limited areas of storefront glazing, and metal and translucent glass entry canopies .
Balconies and garage screening inserts include translucent perforated metal screening.
Simulated renderings of the proposed project are shown in Figure 5 from the four corners
surrounding the project site.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 473
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 5
Landscape Design
As shown in Figure 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan, a 20-foot building setback is required at the
project's east side along De Marcus Boulevard due to an existing stormwater easement. This
easement area is planted with a variety of taller flowering shrubs and succulents that delineate
the space while avoiding the use of fences or walls.
Colored concrete unit pavers and integral colored concrete connect the project site with the
rest of the Dublin Transit Center, while helping to define the main entries and pedestrian
promenade along DeMarcus Boulevard.
Benches and raised planters are located throughout the landscape public spaces. Bio-retention
planters are used to define the private entries along the north side.
A three-foot landscape strip separates the garage from the side walk along Campbell Lane. The
landscape strip is planted with a variety of drought tolerant flowering shrubs and succulents
and a variety of aromatic plants. Flowering vines are proposed along the garage facade.
Pedestrian and Vehicular Access
As shown in Figure 4a: Level 1 Floor Plan, to facilitate pedestrian connectivity between the
project and nearby pedestrian destinations to the south and southwest (i.e. the East
Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and Campbell Green Park), the primary entry is located near
the project's southeast corner at the intersection of DeMarcus Boulevard and Campbell Lane.
The primary entry lobby is open to two floors and is setback to accommodate a pedestrian
plaza, which includes landscaped terraces that function as stepped planters and provide public
seating.
A second entry lobby is located mid-block on the north side of the building. Similar to the
primary entry, the building is setback creating a second smaller pedestrian plaza with similar
landscaping.
Vehicular entry to the parking garage is from Campbell Lane on the project's south side, near
the primary entry plaza.
Project Engineering
Grading
The project site is essentially flat. Earthwork would include minimal grading and contouring to
accommodate drainage and elevation requirements. Regrading would result in elevations
contours changing from 334 feet (above mean sea level) along the southern boundary, to 337
feet along the northern boundary. The project will require the cut of 600 cubic yards of soil,
and the fill of 1,700 cubic yards of soil; for a net import of 1,100 cubic yards. See Figure 7:
Preliminary Grading Plan.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 474
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 6
The project site is located within a 500-year flood hazard area, as defined by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
Water and Sewer
Existing domestic water mains available for connection adjacent to the project site include a 12-
inch main in DeMarcus Boulevard, and an eight-inch main on Campbell Lane. As part of the
proposed project, a new domestic water service lateral will connect to the eight-inch main on
Campbell Lane at the northwest corner of the project site .
The proposed project will utilize an existing six-inch recycled water main on Campbell Lane.
The project would use recycled water for landscape irrigation.
A new proposed sanitary sewer lateral would connect with the existing eight-inch sewer main
on Campbell Lane. See Figure 8: Preliminary Utility Plan.
Stormwater
The project site is currently paved with asphalt . Essentially all of the stormwater falling on to
the project site sheet flows untreated into the City’s storm drain system.
As shown in Figure 9: Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan, stormwater from the roof (64,671
square feet) will be collected and passed through several flow-through planter boxes that
contain plants, treatment soil, and gravel. Once treated, this stormwater will flow into the
existing 18-inch storm drain on Campbell Lane. Stormwater from the ground level runoff
(19,870 square feet) will flow into an underground stormwater treatment vault, and then into
the existing 18-inch storm drain on Campbell Lane.
Essentially, the volume of stormwater flowing into the City’s storm drainage system will remain
unchanged; however, the rate of flow will be slower by the use of the flow-through planter
boxes and the stormwater treatment vault.
Erosion Control
During construction, a construction fence and fiber roll will be installed around the entire
perimeter of the project site. Inlet sediment barriers, per City standards, will be installed on all
existing storm drain structures until the project site is stabilized (see Figure 10: Preliminary
Erosion Control Plan).
Project Approvals
The proposed project includes a Stage 2 Planned Development Rezone, a Tentative Tract Map,
and Site Development Review Permit for the construction of a 220-unit residential building.
The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the
approvals required for the proposed project. City Council action will include adoption of the
Exemption for CEQA review and approval of the Stage 2 Planned Development Rezone, the
Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Review Permit.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 475
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 7
Environmental Analysis
The discussion below analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project per
the criteria as described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section
15162. For convenience, this analysis uses the Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines as a
framework for analysis. As such, the check-boxes in the column labeled “No Impact/No New
Impact” in the tables below indicates that no new environmental review is required because
none of the standards under Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section
15162 are met. There are no project changes, new information or change circumstances that
result in a new or substantially increase in severity of a significant impact from those identified
in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. No standards for requiring supplemental environmental
review under CEQA are met.
Aesthetics
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ☒
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not
limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
☒
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
☒
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
☒
Previous CEQA documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
Mitigation Measure 4.1-1 for Impact 4.4-1 encouraged the inclusion of breaks in building
designs and view corridors to provide views of Mt. Diablo to the north, considering the need
for noise control and the intent of the Dublin Transit Center to provide a compact transit-
oriented design.
Mitigation Measure 4.1-2 requires that a condition of Site Development Review for individual
projects, the City of Dublin shall require submittal of lighting plans for all non -residential
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 476
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 8
projects along Iron Horse Parkway to ensure that all exterior light fixtures will either be
oriented downward or equipped with cut-off lenses to ensure that no spill-over of unwanted
light onto adjacent residential areas shall occur.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to applicable mitigation measures related to
aesthetics set forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Scenic vistas, views
No New Impact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR found that the greatest impact to scenic vistas
and views would on existing background views to Mount Diablo and surrounding ridgelines.
Existing views of the project site are surrounded by residential developments to the west,
north, and east. A BART surface parking lot and an electrical power substation is located across
Campbell Lane to the south.
Because obstruction of distant ridgeline views would be similar to the view obstructions caused
by the surrounding developments and analyzed in the EIR, there would be no new or
substantially more severe significant impacts to scenic vistas and views beyond what has been
analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review
are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(b) Scenic resources
No New Impact. The project site is located north of the I- 580 freeway, which is a local scenic
highway, but is located on the northern portion of the Dublin Transit Center and is not highly
visible from the freeway due to intervening buildings between the project site and the
Interstate 580 freeway.
A view corridor would be preserved along the western property line for views from the
Interstate 580 freeway to the northwest, as required by Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation
Measure 4.1-1.
No scenic resources exist on the project site, including but not limited to significant stands of
tree, rock outcroppings or bodies of water, so there would be no impact with respect to
damage to scenic resources.
No public parks, playgrounds or other public gathering places exist on the project site so that
scenic vistas could be viewed.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to scenic res ources beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met . Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 477
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 9
(c) Substantially degrade the visual character of the site or surrounding area
No New Impact. Simulated renderings of the proposed project are shown in Figure 5 from the
four corners surrounding the project site. The proposed land uses and their building height s
and scale, are consistent with those land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed building
heights are also consistent with height limits as identified in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
The proposed project includes constructing a multi-family residential development with
parking, landscaping and other improvements where none now exist.
Because the proposed project is consistent in building height, massing, and scale analyzed in
the EIR, there would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to the visual
character of the project site or surrounding area beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmental review is required.
(d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare
No New Impact. Implementation of the proposed project result in a slight increase in daytime
and nighttime light and glare. The main sources of daytime glare would be from sunlight
reflecting from structures with reflective surfaces, such as windows . The main sources of
nighttime light and glare would be from additional lighting, including, but not limited to,
internal and external building lights from proposed residential uses, street lighting, site lighting,
and lights associated with vehicular travel (i.e., vehicle headlights).
The Dublin Transit Center EIR found that there is a potential for lighting from non -residential
uses to spill over into residential areas, creating a nuisance to Transit Center residents.
Mitigation Measure 4.1-2 requires that a cond ition of Site Development Review for individual
projects, the City of Dublin shall require submittal of lighting plans for all non -residential
projects along Iron Horse Parkway to ensure that all exterior light fixtures will either be
oriented downward or equipped with cut-off lenses to ensure that no spill-over of unwanted
light onto adjacent residential areas shall occur.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to light and glare beyond
what has been analyzed the Dublin Transit Center EIR, and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 478
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 10
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Con servation as an optional model
to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
☒
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
☒
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
of Farmland to non-agricultural use?
☒
Previous CEQA documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
No significant impacts to agricultural or forestry resources were identified in this document.
Project Impacts
(a-c) Convert farmland or conflict with zoning
No New Impact. No significant impacts were identified with respect to agricultural resources in
previous CEQA document listed above. No new conditions have been identified in this
document with respect to conversion of prime farmland to a non•agricultural use. No new or
more severe significant impacts would result than were analyzed in previous CEQA document
for this site.
The City of Dublin has previously zoned the project site for residential uses. No agricultural
zoning or Williamson Act contracts presently exist on the project site nor are any agricultural
operations on-going. Therefore, there would be no new or substantially more severe significant
impacts to farmland beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 479
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 11
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Air Quality
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations .
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
☒
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
☒
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
☒
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
☒
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin Transit Center EIR identified the following significant air quality impacts and
mitigation measures:
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.2-1 reduced impacts related to construction emission from
construction equipment (see Impact 4.2-1) to a less-than-significant level. Specific items
listed in this measure required contractors to water construction area and stockpiled
material and other items based on BAAQMD standards.
▪ Impact 4.2-3 noted that project air emissions of ozone would exceed the BAAQMD
threshold of significance for regional impacts. No mitigation is available to reduce this
impact to a less-than significant level and this impact remained significant and
unavoidable.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 480
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 12
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Consistent with air quality plans
No New Impact. Approval and implementation of the proposed project would represent fewer
dwelling units assumed as the basis for the regional Clean Air Plan. The proposed project would
not conflict with the Clean Air Plan adopted by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District
(BAAQMD), since the proposed amount of development has been included in Dublin's planned
growth as part of the City’s General Plan, which is the basis of the Clean Air Plan.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to air quality plans
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(b, c) Violate air quality standards or cause cumulatively considerable air pollutants
No New Impact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR found that proposed development would result
in a significant and unavoidable emission of air emissions exceeding the applicable BAAQMD
standards. Mitigation Measure 4.2-1 was recommended to reduce construction impacts to a
less than significant level. T he proposed project is a high-density mixed-use, transit and
pedestrian-oriented development. These characteristics provide for much higher internal and
non-auto travel mode percentages compared to suburban residential or commercial
development.
With adherence to previous mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to air quality standards or
cause cumulatively considerable air pollutants beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmental review is required.
(d) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors
No New Impact. The health risk of diesel exhaust from roadway traffic was known in 2002
although it was not analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. The 1999 BAAQMD CBQA
Guidelines (1999 Guidelines) identified diesel engine particulate matter as a toxic air
contaminant based on California Air Resources Board (CARB) findings. There were several
studies published prior to 2002 that demonstrated potential health impacts to residences living
close to freeways. (See, studies cited in CARB's 2005 “Air Quality and Land Use Handbook".)
The 1999 Guidelines encourage Lead Agencies to address impacts to sensitive receptors (such as
residences) to exposure of high levels of diesel exhaust from sources such as a high-volume
freeway (1999 BAAQMD CBQA Guidelines, p. 47).
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 481
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 13
BAAQMD recommends that these impacts should be analyzed based on best available
information. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines in effect in 2002 also listed exposure of
sensitive receptors to substantial levels of toxic air contaminants as a potentially significant
impact. This significance threshold was included in the Dublin Transit Center EIR (p. 48). Since
potential health impacts due to exposure to diesel exhaust was known or could have been
known in 2002, the risks of toxic air contaminants from diesel exhaust is not new information
that requires additional analysis under CEQA.
Similarly, recently updated information from CARB and BAAQMD on health impacts of diesel
exhaust and the BAAQMD CEQA significan ce standards do not trigger the requirement for
supplemental environmental review under CEQA section 21166. These new standards do not
identify Toxic Air Contaminants as a "new significant impact." This adverse health impact was
already known and recent n ew information only refined the type and level of analysis.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to sensitive receptors
from pollutant concentrations or create objectionable odors beyond what has been analyzed in
the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Biological Resources
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
☒
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
☒
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 482
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 14
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede th e use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
☒
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
☒
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
This Dublin Transit Center EIR identified the following significant biological impacts.
▪ Impact 4.3-1 noted an impact with loss of Congdon's spikeweed and potentially four
other special-status plants on the project site. This impact was reduced to a less• than-
significant level by adherence to Mitigation Measure 4.3-1 that requires project
Applicants to avoid populations of spikeweed or, if not feasible, an off-site mitigation
program is to be created. Measures to avoid, preserve or mitigate other special-status
plants identified and required to be implemented.
▪ Impact 4.3-2 found a significant impact with respect to California red-legged frogs (CRLF)
or their habitat. This impact was reduced to a less-than-significant level through
adherence to Mitigation Measure 4.3-2. This mitigation measure required a CRLF
preconstruction survey consultation with the USFWS. If populations of CRLF are
identified appropriate protection plans were required to be prepared with necessary
permits from appropriate regulatory agencies.
▪ Impact 4.3-3 noted an impact regarding burrowing owls. Adherence to Mitigation
Measure 4.3-3 reduced this impact to a less-than-significant level by requiring a
preconstruction survey on a development site no more than 30 days prior to grading. If
owls are found, a biologist shall establish an exclusion zone around occupied burrow
until it is confirmed that the burrow is unoccupied.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 483
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 15
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Substantial adverse effect on candidate, sensitive, or special status species
No New Impact. No changes have occurred to the project site since certification of the Dublin
Transit Center in 2002. Mitigation measures contained in the Dublin Transit Center EIR will
continue to apply to the project site.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to candidate, sensitive, or
special status species beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
(b, c) Substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat , natural community, or wetlands
No New Impact. As described in the Dublin Transit Center EIR, there are no wetlands or
riparian features on or adjacent to the project site. There would therefore be no impacts to
wetlands or riparian habitats. Since there are no streams on the project site, the project site is
not subject to the City's Stream Preservation Plan.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to riparian habitat,
natural community or wetlands beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR
and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
(d) Interfere or impede the movement of migratory fish or wildlife
No New Impact. The project site is located in a substantially urbanized area and surrounded by
paved roads or parcels of land that have been developed that would preclude significant
wildlife migration. There are no creeks or streams on the project site that would allow for
migration of fish species. The Dublin Transit Center EIR identified this impact as less than
significant (Impact 4.3-4).
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to migratory fish or
wildlife beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA
standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is
required.
(e) Conflict with local policies or ordinance include tree preservation or any adopted habitat
conservation or natural community conservation plans.
No New Impact. No trees are present on the project site, and there are no impacts regarding
local tree preservation ordinances or policies.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 484
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 16
The project site lies within the Eastern Alameda County Conservation Strategy (EACCS) planning
area. The City of Dublin utilizes the Conservation Strategy as guidance for environmental
permitting for public projects, and private development proj ects are encouraged to use the
EACCS as a resource as well. The Conservation Strategy embodies a regional approach to
permitting and mitigation for wildlife habitat impacts associated with land development,
infrastructure, and other activities. The Conservation Strategy is neither a Habitat Conservation
Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan, but is a document intended to provide
guidance during the project planning and permitting process to ensure that impacts are offset
in a biologically effective manner.
Because no HCP or NCCP was identified in the prior EIRs and none applies at present, there
would be no new or significantly more severe impacts to tree preservation or any adopted
habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans beyond what has been analyzed
in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Cultural Resources
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
5. CULTURAL R ESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Cause a sub stantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.5?
☒
b) Cause a sub stantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to section 15064.5?
☒
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic featur e?
☒
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of dedicated cemeteries?
☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 485
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 17
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
Impact 4.4-1 contained in the Dublin Transit Center EIR found a potentially significant impact
with respect to historical, archeological and Native American resources on the project site. This
impact was reduced by Mitigation Measure 4.4-1 that required, if archeological, archeological
or Native American artifacts are encountered during construction, work on the project shall
cease until compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 is demonstrated. Work on the
project may commence under the guidance of an approved resource protection plan . The
County Coroner is to be contacted if human remains are uncovered.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to th is applicable mitigation measure as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Historic resources
No New Impact. The site is vacant and contains no built structures. As a result, there would be
no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to historic resources beyond what has
been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental
review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(b, c) Archaeological or paleontological resources
No New Impact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR identified a remote but potentially significant
possibility that construction activities, including site grading, trenching and excavation, may
uncover significant archeological and/or paleontological resources on development sites. None
of these pre-historic sites were identified by the Dublin Transit Center EIR within or near the
project site.
The Dublin Transit Center EIR noted a potentially significant cultural resource impact regarding
unidentified historic, archeological and Native American resources and the project remains
subject to Mitigation Measure 4.4-1.
The Dublin Transit Center EIR identified no known cultural resources for the project site.
However, mitigation for potential but currently un identified resources should they be
discovered during construction is provided in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. The project
remains subject to these prior adopted mitigations.
With adherence to previous mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to archaeological or
paleontological resources beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and
no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 486
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 18
(d) Human remains
No New Impact. The project is subject to existing cultural resource mitigation measures
contained in the Dublin Transit Center EIR regarding potential impacts to human remains.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements , there
would be no new or more severe significant impacts to cultural impacts beyond those
previously analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Geology and Soils
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault?
☒
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ☒
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
☒
iv) Landslides? ☒
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ☒
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
☒
d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 487
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 19
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste
water disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of waste water?
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin Transit Center EIR identified two mitigation measures for the project.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.5-2 reduced the impact related to seismic hazards (Impact 4.5-2)
to a less-than-significant level. This measure required completion of a site-specific
geotechnical investigation prior to development of individual projects. Future projects
are required to be consistent with current building codes.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.5-3 reduced the impact related to expansive soils to a less• than-
significant level (Impact 4.5-3). This measure required site-specific geotechnical reports
to address expansive soils and provide appropriate engineering and construction
techniques to reduce damage from expansive soils.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Seismic hazards
No New Impact. During a major earthquake on a segment of one of the nearby faults,
moderate to strong ground shaking can be expected to occur at the project site. Strong shaking
during an earthquake could result in ground failure such as that associated with soil
liquefaction and differential compaction. Mitigation Measure 4.5-2 will require completion of a
site-specific geotechnical investigation prior to development of individual projects.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to seismic hazards beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 488
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 20
(b) Erosion/topsoil loss
No New Impact. Construction of the proposed project improvements on the project site would
slightly modify the existing ground surface and alter patterns of surface runoff and infiltration
and could result in a short-term increase in erosion and sedimentation caused by grading
activities. The project will also be required to implement the erosion controls from the RWQCB
measures as enforced by the City of Dublin. The City's requirement to implement site-specific
erosion and other controls will reduce erosion from the project site to a less-than-specific level.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to erosion/topsoil loss beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(c-d) Soil stability
No New Impact. Consistent with Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigations Measures 4.5-2 and 4.5-
3, and standard City development procedures, the report contains methods to minimize
impacts from liquefaction and other soil hazards for future site improvements on the project
site.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or more severe significant impacts related to lateral spreading, liquefaction
and other soil hazards beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
(e) Soil capability to support waste water disposal, includ ing septic
No New Impact. As assumed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR, proposed residences on the
project site would be connected to e x i s t i n g sanitary sewers on the adjacent roadways.
Because the project site would be connected to existing sanitary sewers, there would be no
new or substantially more severe significant impacts to soil capability to support waste water
disposal, including septic beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and
no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 489
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 21
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emission s, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
☒
b) Conflict with applicable plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission s of
greenhouse gases?
☒
Since certification of the Dublin Transit Center EIR in 2002, the issue of the contribution of
greenhouse gasses to climate change has become a more prominent issue of concern as
evidenced by passage of AB 32 in 2006.
Because these previous EIRs have been certified, the determination of whether greenhouse
gasses and climate change needs to be analyzed for this proposed project is governed by the
law on supplemental or subsequent EIRs (Public Resources Code section 21166 and CEQA
Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15163). Greenhouse gas and climate change is not required to
be analyzed under those standards unless it constitutes "new information of substantial
importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the previous
EIRs were certified as complete” (CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15162 (a) (3)).
Greenhouse gas and climate change impacts were not analyzed in the prior EIRs; however,
these impacts are not new information that was not known or could not have been known at
the time these previous EIRs were certified. The issue of climate change and greenhouse gasses
was widely known prior to the certification of these EIRs. The United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change was established in 1992. The regulation of greenhouse gas
emissions to reduce climate change impacts was extensively debated and analyzed throughout
the early 1990s. The studies and analyses of this issue resulted in the adoption of the Kyoto
Protocol in 1997.
In the early and mid-2000s, GHGs and climate change were extensively discussed and analyzed
in California. In 2000, SB 1771 established the California Climate Action Registry for the
recordation of greenhouse gas emissions to provide information about potential environmental
impacts. Therefore, the impact of greenhouse gases on climate change was known at the time
of the certification of the Dublin Transit Center EIR in 2002. Under CEQA standards, it is not
new information that requires analysis in a supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration. No
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 490
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 22
supplemental environmental analysis of the project's impacts on this issue is required under
CEQA.
Even if the impact of the project's greenhouse gas emissions was required to be considered
under CEQA, it would be less than significant sin ce the project is consistent with the City's
Climate Action Plan. In October 2010, the City adopted a Climate Action Plan in accordance with
CEQA requirements and BAAQMD's CEQA Guidance. The City’s Climate Action Plan was
subsequently updated in October 2013. The GHG emissions from the Dublin Transit Center
project were included in the Climate Action Plan. The City adopted a Negative Declaration for
the Climate Action Plan finding the impacts of the Climate Action Plan would be less than
significant. The Climate Action Plan serves as the City's qualified GHG Reduction Plan and
programmatic tiering document for the purposes of CEQA for analysis of impacts of greenhouse
gas emissions and climate change.
The City has determined that the reduction target under the Climate Action Plan will reduce the
impact from activities under the Climate Action Plan to less than significant under CEQA (i.e.,
the project will not make a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative
impact). Therefore, CEQA allows the Climate Action Plan to be used for the cumulative impact
analysis for future projects and development in the City covered by the Climate Action Plan. As
such, it satisfies CEQA review requirements for the p roject.
Since the project emissions were included in the Climate Action Plan and the project is
consistent with the applicable emission reduction measures identified in the Specific Plan and
included in the Climate Action Plan, the project would be considered to have a less than
significant impact (i.e. less than cumulatively considerable contribution to significant
cumulative impact) due to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change consistent with Public
Resources Code 21083.3, CEQA Guidelines Sections 15183.5, 15064 and 15130 and BAAQMD
adopted CEQA Guidelines and GHG Significance Thresholds. In fact, the project is exactly the
type of project which reduces greenhouse gas emissions- an infill, transit-oriented, high-density
residential project as part of an overall mixed use development.
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures from the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a, b) Generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or conflict with GHG plans or regulations
As discussed above, no additional environmental analysis is required under CEQA Section 21166
and CEQA Guidelines section 15162.
Source(s)
None.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 491
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 23
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
☒
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
☒
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within
¼ mile of an existing or proposed school?
☒
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant h azard to the public or the
environment?
☒
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
☒
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
☒
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
☒
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 492
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 24
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin Transit Center EIR identified two mitigation measures related to hazards and
hazardous materials.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.6-1 reduced the impact related to release of hazardous materials
on the project site remaining from past military uses (Impact 4.1-1) to a less• than-
significant level. This measure required completion of additional environmental analysis
(Phase I and/or Phase II reports) and completion of any clean-up of recognized
hazardous materials on the project site.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.6-2 reduced the impact related to risk of upset from a nearby
petroleum pipeline adjacent to the Iron Horse Trail to a less-than• significant level
(Impact 4.6-2). This measure required future developers on Sites A and C within the
Dublin Transit Center to identify the presence of the petroleum pipeline to avoid
damage by construction equipment . Future residences on Sites A and C are also
required to maintain a minimum 50-foot setback from the pipeline to the nearest
habitable structure.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials
No New Impact. There would be no impact to the transport, use or disposal of hazardous
materials, since the proposed project involves construction of a residential development on the
project site. Proposed land uses on the project site would not use, store or transport significant
quantities of hazardous materials. To the extent there are potentially hazardous materials used
in construction, the impacts would be less than significant due to compliance with regulatory
requirements.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to transport, use or
disposal of hazardous materials beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR
and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
(b) Potential release of hazardous materials into the environment
No New Impact. The Phase I ESA report prepared for the project prepared pursuant to Dublin
Transit Center EIR Mitigation Measure 4.6-1 did not identify any significant hazards to the
public or the environment as a result of release of hazardous materials . Adherence to
Mitigation Measures 4.6-1 and 4.6-2 contained in the Dublin Transit Center EIR will ensure that
release of hazardous materials would be less than significant.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 493
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 25
Pursuant to the Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation Measure 4.6-2, development on the
project site is required to maintain a minimum 50-foot wide structural setback from the Kinder•
Morgan oil pipeline that runs adjacent to the Iron Horse Trail. This requirement has been met
as shown on Figure 2: Project Aerial Diagram.
The project includes residential development as assumed in the Transit Center EIR and through
the Phase I ESA, project design and conditions of approval, has complied or will comply with t he
adopted mitigation measures.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to the potential release of
hazardous materials beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
(c) Emit hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school
No New Impact. No schools exist or are planned within one quarter mile of the project area .
Because no schools exist or are planned within one quarter mile of the project area, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to emitting hazardous
materials within an existing or proposed school beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmental review is required.
(d) Listed as a hazardous materials site
No New Impact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR examined the potential for hazardous materials
extensively and the project site is not listed on the State of California Department of Toxic
Substances Control as an identified hazardous site as of February 26, 2012 (last update).
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to listed hazardous
materials sites beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other
CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review
is required.
(e-f) Proximity to a public or private airport
No New Impact. The project site lies north of the Airport Influence Area of Livermore Municipal
Airport and is not included in the Airport Influence Area. Because the project site is not within
proximity to a public or private airport, there would be no new or substantially more severe
significant impacts to public or private airports beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no
further environmental review is required.
(g) Impair implementation of an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan
No New Impact. The proposed project would include the construction of a residential project
on private land. No emergency evacuation plan would be affected since no roadways would be
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 494
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 26
blocked. Therefore, there would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(h) Expose people or structures to wildland fires
No New Impact. The project site is in an urbanized area of Eastern Dublin and contains no
flammable structures or vegetation, as identified in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. Properties
east, west, and north are developed and there is no possible exposure from wildland fires. As a
result, there would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to exposing
people or structures to wildland fires beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit
Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no
further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Livermore Municipal Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, 2012.
Hydrology and Water Quality
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
☒
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local ground water table level (for example, the
production rate of pre-existin g nearby wells would drop
to a level which would not support existing land uses or
planned uses for which permits have been granted)?
☒
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site.
☒
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 495
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 27
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off-site.
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed
the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
☒
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ☒
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood-hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
☒
h) Place within a 100-year flood -hazard area structures
which would imped e or redirect flood flows?
☒
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
☒
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ☒
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The following impacts and mitigation measures related to hydrology and water quality were
identified in this EIR.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.7-1 reduced the impact related to non-point source pollution
(Impact 4.7-3) to a less-than-significant level. This measure required future individual
site developers to prepare and implement erosion control plans. If needed, additional
provisions may be required for the proper handling and disposal of hazardous materials .
Associated Mitigation Measure 4.7-2 required each developer to prepare and
implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan to Regional Water Board standards.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.7-3 reduced the construction impact related to short-term
increases of soil erosion from wind and water (Impact 4.7-4) to a less-than• significant
level. This mitigation required individual project Applicants to prepare and implement
erosion control plans for the project construction period, consistent with Regional
Water Board standards. Measures included but were not limited to revegetation of
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 496
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 28
graded areas, protection of stockpiled material, constructing sediment ponds and
related items.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Violate water quality or waste discharge requirements
No New Impact. Approval and construction of the proposed development project would alter
impervious surfaces to the undeveloped site that would decrease the net amount of
stormwater runoff and potentially degrade water quality. The City of Dublin requires new
development proposals to adhere to the most recent surface water quality standards adopted
by the RWQCB. The Municipal Regional Permit Provision C.3.g requires that stormwater
discharges not cause and increase in erosion potential of the receiving stream over the existing
condition.
For this project, the project is proposing to install flow-through planter boxes that contain
plants, treatment soil and gravel. The planters are located in the open courtyard areas and the
perimeter areas at the building. Once treated, this stormwater will flow into the existing 18-
inch storm drain on Campbell Lane. Stormwater from the ground level runoff will flow into an
underground stormwater treatment vault, and then into the existing 18-inch storm drain on
Campbell Lane. These stormwater systems, as required by the RWQCB, will help to ensure that
water quality and waste discharge standards are met .
With adherence to applicable mitigation measures and regulatory requirements, there would
be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to water quality or waste discharge
requirements beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other
CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review
is required.
(b) Substantially deplete or interfere with groundwater supplies
No New Impact.
The existing site provide minimal groundwater recharge. Although the currently vacant site
would be converted to an urban use, a small portion of the project site would remain as open
space, which would allow some recharge of the underground aquifer.
The proposed water source for this project would rely on surf ace water supplies from the
Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) and not local groundwater supplies. The project is
required to support Zone 7’s groundwater recharge program. Zone 7’s policy is to only pump
groundwater it artificially recharges usin g its imported surface water or locally-stored runoff
from Arroyo del Valley. Compliance with this would maintain groundwater at a no net loss for
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 497
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 29
the Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin. As a result, the proposed project would not result in
a net increase in groundwater extraction from Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to groundwater supplies beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(c) Substantially alter existing drainage patterns re: erosion/siltation
No New Impact. New impervious surfaces would be constructed on the project site to
accommodate new dwellings, roadways, driveways and similar surfaces, consistent with the
development assumptions in the prior EIRs.
The project Applicant is subject to comply with the Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation
Measure 4.7-3, which requires project Applicants to implement an erosion control plan to
minimize polluted runoff reduced impacts related to changed drainage patterns to a less -than-
significant level (see Figure 10: Preliminary Erosion Control Plan).
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to erosion/siltation beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(d) Substantially alter existing drainage patterns re: flooding
No New Impact. Construction of the project would not significantly change drainage patterns
and proposed storm drain facilities will be adequately sized for project runoff (see item "e"
below).
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to flooding beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(e) Runoff exceed drainage capacity, or add pollution
No New Impact. The amount of stormwater flowing into the City’s storm drainage system will
remain unchanged; however, the rate of flow will be slower using flow-through planter boxes
and the stormwater treatment vault.
Furthermore, the proposed project is subject to adopted Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation
Measure 4.7-3. This mitigation measure requires individual project Applicants to prepare and
implement erosion control plans. In compliance with existing EIR mitigation measures, the
project Applicant proposes the construction of both bio-retention flow-through planter boxes
and a stormwater treatment vault to comply with both City requirements and previous EIR
mitigation measures. The proposed storm drain facilities are adequately sized for project
runoff and designed to filter out pollutants. In addition, the project Applicant proposes to
install full trash capture devices to meet the MRP Trash Reduction requirements.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 498
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 30
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to drainage capacity, or
additional pollution beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
(g, h, i) 100-year flood hazard, dam/levee failure
No New Impact. The project site is located within a 500-year flood hazard area, but outside of
a 100-year flood hazard area.
Compliance with the City of Dublin's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan will ensure
that hazards to visitors and residents on the project site as a result of dam failure will be
reduced to a less-than• significant level by providing an emergency evacuation plan in the event
of a dam failure.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to 100-year flood hazard and to dam or levee failure beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow
No New Impact. The site is not located near a major body of water that could result in a seiche.
The risk of potential mudflow is considered low since no historic landslides or mudflows have
been identified on the project site. There would be no impact with implementation of the
proposed project.
Since the project site and surrounding properties are relatively flat (less than 2 percent cross
slope), no impacts are anticipated with respect to landslide hazard.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA
standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is
required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Land Use and Planning
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 499
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 31
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? ☒
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
☒
c) Conflict with any applicable Habitat Conservation Plan or
Natural Community Conservation Plan?
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures from the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Physically divide an established community
No New Impact. The project site is located in the Eastern Dublin planning area . The project
reflects the type and location of development assumed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. As
noted in the land use discussion in the Dublin Transit Center EIR (see, e.g., Impact 4.8-2), the
project site is consistent with existing land uses and would not divide an established
community.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to an established
community beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA
standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is
required.
(b) Conflict with general plan
No New Impact. The proposed project would be consistent with environmental goals and
policies contained in the City’s General Plan.
As shown in Table 1: Dublin Transit Center Development & Entitlements (in the Project
Description), the total number of units constructed in Site A, including the proposed project,
would be 384 units, 46 units less than total 430 units allocated . The total number of units
constructed within Site A, B and C of the Dublin Transit Center project area, including the
proposed project, would be 1,451 units, 49 units less than the total allocation of 1,500 units .
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 500
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 32
The proposed project would not exceed the allocation of residential units envisioned for Site A,
nor the greater Dublin Transit Center project, and is therefore consistent with the development
plans as analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts due to conflict with
environmental protection policies in the General Plan beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan o r natural community conservation
plan
No New Impact. The project site lies within the Eastern Alameda County Conservation Strategy
(EACCS) planning area. The City of Dublin utilizes the Conservation Strategy as guidance for
environmental permitting for public projects, and private development projects are encouraged
to use the EACCS as a resource as well. The Conservation Strategy embodies a regional
approach to permitting and mitigation for wildlife habitat impacts associated with land
development, infrastructure, and other activities. The Conservation Strategy is neither a
Habitat Conservation Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), but is a
document intended to provide guidance during the project planning and permitting process to
ensure that impacts are offset in a biologically effective manner.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to an HCP or NCCP
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Mineral Resources
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
☒
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resource reco very site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 501
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 33
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures from the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a-b) Loss of known or identified mineral resource
No New Impact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR indicated that significant deposits of minerals do
not exist on the project site, so there would be no new or substantially more severe significant
impacts to mineral resources that would occur beyond what has been previously analyzed in the
Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplementa l review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Noise
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
12. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other
agencies?
☒
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels?
☒
c) Substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
☒
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
☒
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 502
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 34
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels?
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The Dublin Transit Center EIR identified the following impacts and mitigation measures.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.9-1 reduced short-term construction noise (Impact 4.9-1) to a
less-than-significant level by requiring individual project Applicants to prepare
Construction Noise Management Plans and to have these approved by the Dublin
Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of a
grading permit. Each plan shall identify specific noise reduction measures, including
listing of construction hours, use of mufflers on construction equipment, on-site speed
limits for construction equipment and similar measures.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.9-2 reduced impacts related to permanent noise on residential
uses (Impact 4.9-2) to a less-than-significant level by requiring individual residential
developers to prepare acoustic reports that lists specific measures to be taken to reduce
noise to City exposure limits, including but not limited to window glazing, ventilation
systems and noise barriers.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.9-3 reduced impacts related to helicopter overflights from Camp
Parks RFTA (Impact 4.9-3) to a less-than-significant level by requiring notification of such
overflights to future residents.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Exposure to or generate noise exceeding standards
No New Impact. As analyzed in previous EIR, development of proposed residential land uses on
the project site would increase noise on the project site and future residences would be sub ject
to traffic noise from vehicles surrounding roadway, in particular Dublin Boulevard to the north
and Interstate 580 to the south.
Consistent with the Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation Measure 4.9 -2, the Applicant is
required to complete a site-specific acoustic report prior to issuance of a building permit. The
report will include any specific measures that are necessary to reduce noise to City standards.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 503
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 35
Adherence to these previous noise mitigation measures, noise standards in the Dublin General
Plan, and the City Noise Ordinance, will reduce noise to a less-than-significant level. No new or
more significant noise impacts have been identified beyond what has been previously analyzed.
The Dublin Transit Center EIR found exposure of proposed residential development to noise
from future military training activities at Camp Parks RFTA to be less than significant after
mitigation to the Transit Center project area. The mitigation requires providing written notice
to future residents will be implemented through conditions of approval on the project.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to exposure from noise
exceeding standards beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
(b) Exposure to ground borne vibration or ground borne noise
No New Impact. The proposed project would not include construction or operational elements
that would result in significant groundborne vibration levels to nearby residents.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to ground borne
vibration or ground borne noise beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center
EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
(c) Permanently increasing ambient noise levels
No New Impact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR found that future exposure of housing nearest to
Dublin Boulevard and I-580 would be subject to potentially significant noise levels. Future traffic
generated by the proposed project would contribute to future exposure of housing to future
roadway noise. However, the impacts of the proposed project with respect to increases in
permanent noise levels are within the scope of the impacts associated with the project analyzed
in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. The type and intensity of development proposed as part of the
proposed project, and the noise generated and associated impacts on residential uses, have
been identified and analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. The project Applicant would be
required to comply with Dublin Transit Center EIR Mitigation Measure 4.9 -2, requiring individual
residential developers to prepare acoustic reports to reduce noise to City expos ure limits.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to permanently increasing
ambient noise levels beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no
other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental
review is required.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 504
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 36
(d) Substantial temporary noise increase
No New Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would result in short-term
construction noise. The project Applicant would be required to comply with the Dublin Transit
Center EIR Mitigation Measure 4.9-1, requiring individual project Applicants to prepare
Construction Noise Management Plans that identify specific construction noise reduction
measures to minimize noise to existing and future housing, as well as adhere to construction
hour limitations.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts associated with a substantial
temporary noise increase beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and
no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
(e, f) Excessive noise level near a public or private airport
No New Impact. Based on Exhibit 3-2 contained in the Livermore Municipal Airport Land Use
Compatibility Plan (2012), the project site lies north of the noise compatibility zone for this
airport. The project site would therefore not be subjected to substantial aircraft noise from
this airport. However, the Dublin Transit Center EIR notes that the project site could be subject
to potential noise from helicopter operations from Camp Parks RFTA and the project
Applicant's adherence to Transit Center EIR Mitigation Measure 4.9-3 by requiring notification
of such overflights to future residents.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts from aviation noise beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Livermore Municipal Airport, Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, 2012.
Population and Housing
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 505
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 37
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
☒
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures from the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Population growth
No New Impact. Approval of the proposed project would not induce substantial additional
population growth in the Eastern Dublin area, since development on the affected properties
has long been envisioned in the Dublin General Plan and the Dublin Transit Center Stage 1
Zoning, as described in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. Approval of the proposed project would
result in fewer dwellings being constructed than currently approved in the Dublin Transit Center
project area for Sites A, B and C (1,451 units, 49 units less than the total allocation of 1,500
units).
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to population growth
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(b-c) Housing and resident displacement
No New Impact. Since the project site is vacant, no housing units or people would be displaced
should the project be approved and implemented. No houses were on the project site when
the prior EIRs were certified.
Because the project site is vacant, there would be no new or substantially more severe
significant impacts to housing displacement beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmental review is required.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 506
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 38
Source(s)
City of Dublin Web site. Accessed September 12, 2017. Available at
http://www.ci.dublin.ca.us/238/Community-and-Economic-Profile
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Public Services
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or need for new or physical altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of
the public services:
a) Fire protection ? ☒
b) Police protection ? ☒
c) Schools? ☒
d) Parks? ☒
e) Other public facilities? ☒
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures from the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Fire
No New Impact. Construction of the proposed project would increase demand for fire and
emergency services by increasing the amount of permanent daytime population on the project
site. Features will be incorporated into the project as part of existing City ordinances and
development requirements, which assist in reducing impacts. These features include
installation of on-site fire protection measures such as fire sprinklers, installation of new fire
hydrants that meet the minimum fire flow requirements contained in the Uniform Building
Code and Uniform Fire Code.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 507
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 39
As part of the City’s Development Fee Program, the project Applicant will be required to pay an
impact fee for fire facilities to serve new development in the City. This impact fee relates to
funding new fire facilities in Eastern Dublin, ensuring adequate water supplies and pressure for
fire suppression, and minimizing wildland fire hazards.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to fire services beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmental review is required.
(b) Police
No New Impact. Incremental increases in the demand for police service could be expected
should the project be approved and constructed . This increase in calls for service would be off-
set through adherence to City of Dublin safety requirements from the Dublin Police Services,
including the Non-Residential Security Ordinance.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to police services beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore,
no further environmental review is required.
(c) Schools
No New Impact. No new impacts to school service are anticipated since payment of mandated
statutory impact fees at the time of issuance of building permits will provide mitigation of
educational impacts of the proposed project pursuant to State law. The currently proposed
project would result in fewer school• aged children to be accommodated in DUSD school
facilities than was assumed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR (1,451 units, 49 units less than the
total allocation of 1,500 units) and mitigation of impacts is limited by statute to payment of
impact fees to the School District by the project Applicant.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to schools beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit
Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no
further environmental review is required.
(d, e) Other public facilities
No New Impact. Approval and construction of the project would incrementally increase the
long-term maintenance demand for roads and other public facilities . However, such additional
maintenance demands will be off-set by additional City fees and property tax revenues accruing
to the City of Dublin and therefore impacts would be less-than-significant.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, including payment of fees, there would
be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to other public facilities beyond
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 508
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 40
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. 2017. Fire Services and Prevention. Accessed September 13, 2017. Available at
http://dublinca.gov/22/Fire-Services-Prevention.
City of Dublin. 2017. Police Services. Accessed September 13, 2017. Available at
http://www.ci.dublin.ca.us/91/Police-Services.
City of Dublin. 2017. Schools. Accessed September 13, 2017. Available at
http://www.dublin.ca.gov/401/Schools.
City of Dublin. 2017. Parks and Community Services. Accessed September 13, 2017. Available
at http://www.dublin.ca.gov/90/Parks-Community-Services.
City of Dublin. 2017. Fire Facilities Impact Fee Study Update. Accessed October 23, 2017.
Available at http://dublinca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/16547.
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Recreation
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
☒
b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction
or expansion of recreational facilities which might have
an adverse physical effect on the environment?
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
Impacts to parks and recreational facilities were found to be less• than-significant and no
mitigation measures were contained in this EIR.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 509
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 41
Project Impacts
(a, b) Increase the use of existing recreation facilities causing deterioration or require new
recreation facilities
No New Impact. As envisioned in the Dublin Transit Center EIR for the project site, approval
and construction of the proposed project would increase the use of nearby City or regional
recreational facilities, since it would include increasing the on -site permanent population
currently on the project site. However, there would be fewer residents at build-out as
previously envisioned in the Dublin Transit Center EIR. Consistent with City Zoning
requirements, the Applicant proposes to provide private recreation amenities on the project
site and will be required to pay City of Dublin Community Facility Fees to assist in providing off-
site parks.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to parks beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit
Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no
further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Transportation/Traffic
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy
establishing measures of effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation system taking into
account all modes of transportation including mass
transit and non-motorized travel and relevant
components of the circulation system, including but not
limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways,
pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
☒
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management
program, including, but not limited to level of service
standards and travel demand measures, or other
standards established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 510
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 42
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
☒
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(for example, sharp curves or dangerous intersections)
or incompatible uses (for example, farm equipment)?
☒
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ☒
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities,
or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such
facilities?
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
Transit Center EIR
The Dublin Transit Center EIR identified the following significant supplemental impacts and
mitigation measures related to traffic and transportation:
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.11-1 required roadway improvements for the Scarlett Drive
extension, the Dublin Boulevard / Dougherty Road intersection and the Hacienda
Drive/Interstate 580 westbound off-ramp to reduce impacts related to project traffic on
external roadway intersections to a less-than-significant level (Impact 4.11-1).
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.11-2 reduced the impact of parking on the Transit Center site with
respect to future BART parking (Impact 4.11-4). This measure required the City to post
all on-street parking within the Transit Center for limited parking hours (2-4 hours).
Individual development projects are to be designed to limit BART parking.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.11-3 partially but not fully reduced impacts related to cumulative
traffic (Impact 4.11-5). This mitigation measure required additional roadway
improvements to the Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection which was found
to be infeasible.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.11-4 reduced local roadway segments impacts (Impact 4.11-6) to
a less-than-significant level by requiring the widening of Hacienda Drive between
Central Parkway and Gleason Drive from three to four lanes and the Scarlett Drive
extension should be constructed between Dublin Boulevard and Dougherty Road.
No feasible mitigation was found to reduce impacts to mainline freeway operations in the year
2025 (Impact 4.11-7) and this impact was found to be significant and unavoidable.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 511
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 43
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a-b, f) Conflict with applicable transportation plans standards, including congestion
management plans
No new impact. The Dublin Transit Center EIR considered the development of the project site
with residential land uses on the local and regional roadway and freeway networks and
adopted mitigation measures to address transportation impacts. The total number of units
constructed within Sites A, B and C of the Dublin Transit Center project area, including the
proposed project would be 1,451 units, 49 units less than the total allocation of 1,500 units as
analyzed in the previous CEQA document. Therefore, the proposed project, in context to the
greater Dublin Transit Center project would generate fewer daily and AM and PM peak hour
trips than previously analyzed.
Furthermore, the City of Dublin has adopted a Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program which requires
developers to contribute their 'fair-share' of sub-regional traffic improvements required for
new development within the Eastern Dublin area, which includes the Dublin Transit Center
project area. The project is within the scope and level of development and impacts and is
required to participate in the Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Program.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, including payment of fees, there would
be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to applicable transportation plans
standards, including congestion management plans, beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(c) Change in air traffic patterns
No New Impact. The proposed project would have no impact on air traffic patterns, since it
involves residential development and is located outside of the Livermore Airport general
referral area.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to air traffic patterns
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
No New Impact. Approval of the proposed project would add sidewalks and other vehicular
and pedestrian travel ways where none currently exist . The proposed project would be
required to comply with current City engineering design standards and other safety standards
to ensure that no safety hazards would be created or exacerbated.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to mobility design features beyond what has been analyzed in
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 512
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 44
the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(e) Result in inadequate emergency access
No New Impact. Fire access to the building will be along the southern property boundary
(Campbell Lane). No impacts would result with respect to emergency access.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to emergency access
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(f) Conflict with adopted alternative transportation plans
No New Impact. The proposed project would include on-site bicycle parking and sidewalks
providing connections between proposed buildings and nearby streets. No conflicts to plans,
policies or programs that promote public transit, ped estrian use or similar features were
identified in previous CEQA reviews for the subject property . Furthermore, the project
proposes to implement/construct the following items consistent with the City’s Complete
Streets Policy:
▪ Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant parking spaces
▪ ADA compliant sidewalks and curb ramps
▪ Emergency vehicle access to the project site
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to adopted alternative transportation plans beyond what has
been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental
review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Complete Streets Principals adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin
Resolution No. 199-12, December 4, 2013.
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Tribal Cultural Resources
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 513
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 45
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical
resources a s defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
☒
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c)
of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
There are no applicable mitigation measures from the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources
No New Impact. The site is vacant and contains no historically significant resources . There
would therefore be no impacts to historical resources.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to historical resources
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(b) Significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1
No New Impact. The project is subject to existing cultural resource mitigation measures
contained in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
There are no known significant Tribal Cultural Resources on the Project site. Impact 4.4-1
contained in the Dublin Transit Center EIR found a potentially significant impact with respect to
unknown Native American resources on the project site. This impact was reduced by Mitigation
Measure 4.4-1 that required, if archeological, archeological or Native American artifacts are
encountered during construction, work on the project shall cease until compliance with CEQA
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 514
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 46
Guidelines Section 15064.5 is demonstrated. Work on the project may commence under the
guidance of an approved resource protection plan. The County Coroner is to be contacted if
human remains are uncovered.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to this applicable mitigation measure as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
With adherence to required mitigation measures and applicable regulatory requirements, there
would be no new or more severe significant impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources beyond those
previously analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Utilities and Service Systems
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
18. UTILITIES AN D SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
☒
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction or which could cause
significant environmental effects?
☒
c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? (V.4)
☒
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
☒
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
☒
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 515
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 47
ENVIRONM ENTAL IMPACTS
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Issues
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
/No
New
Impact
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity
to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal
needs?
☒
g) Comply with federal, state, an d local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
☒
Previous CEQA Documents
Dublin Transit Center EIR
The following utility services impacts and mitigation measures were noted in the Dublin Transit
Center EIR.
▪ Mitigation Measure 4.12-4 reduced impacts to provision of electrical service to the
Transit Center site (Impact 4.12-8) to a less-than-significant level by requiring Applicants
for individual projects to submit a will-serve letters to the City prior to issuance of a
building permit.
The proposed project will be required to adhere to these applicable mitigation measures as set
forth in the Dublin Transit Center EIR.
Project Impacts
(a, e) Wastewater treatment requirements and facilities
No New Impact. The total number of units constructed within Sites A, B and C of the Dublin
Transit Center project area, including the proposed project would be 1,451 units, 49 units less
than the total allocation of 1,500 units as analyzed in the previous CEQA document . The
addition of wastewater flows from the proposed project would not cause the plant to exceed
local, state, and federal water quality standards. The proposed project would not change the
urban scale of development anticipated .
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to wastewater
treatment requirements beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and
no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further
environmental review is required.
(b) Require construction of new water and wastewater facilities
No New Impact. Water, recycled water and wastewater extensions to existing mains that
currently exist within the Dublin Transit Center would need to be constructed to serve the
project site. Treatment and disposal facilities from the construction of the proposed project
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 516
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 48
would not result in a new or more severe significant impacts than were analyzed in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR, which assumed residential development on Site A at a higher density than
now proposed.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to water or wastewater
treatment facilities beyond what has been analyzed in previous CEQA documents, and n o
additional analysis is required.
(c) Stormwater drainage
No New Impact. As shown in Figure 9: Preliminary Stormwater Control Plan, new on• site
drainage facilities would be constructed as part of project construction . The proposed project
would require new and or upgraded drainage facilities to support the proposed development.
Consistent with the City requirements, the project Applicant will be required to install new or
upgraded on and off-site (if required) storm drain systems that comply with City of Dublin and
Zone 7 standards. The current project would include flow-through planter boxes and a
stormwater treatment vault to ensure consistency with regional C.3 stormwater treatment and
hydromodification requirements.
With adherence to applicable regulatory requirements, there would be no new or substantially
more severe significant impacts to stormwater drainage beyond what has been analyzed in the
Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.
Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(d) Sufficient water supply
No New Impact. Approval of the proposed project would result in an increased demand for
water for domestic and irrigation purposes, similar to water use projections previously
analyzed, as identified in the previous CEQA document. The increased water demand could be
accommodated by DSRSD and Zone 7 facilities and long-term supplies. Recycled water would
be supplied to the project site for landscape irrigation by DSRSD. The project Applicant would
be required to provide any local extensions and connections to the existing recycled water
lines.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to water supply beyond
what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards for
supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
(f, g) Solid waste disposal and regulatory compliance
No New Impact. Approval of the proposed project would incrementally increase the generation
of solid waste. Over the long term, the amount of solid waste reaching the landfill would
decrease as statewide regulations mandating increased recycling take effect . The Dublin Transit
Center EIR found that there would be adequate capacity within the local landfill to
accommodate increases in the amount of solid waste. Information contained in the Dublin
Transit Center EIR indicates that additional equipment and personnel would be needed to
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 517
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
City of Dublin Ashton Dublin Station CEQA Analysis
| Page 49
collect the increased amount of solid waste. However, increased fees and user charges would
offset any increased capital and/or personnel costs.
There would be no new or substantially more severe significant impacts to solid waste disposal
beyond what has been analyzed in the Dublin Transit Center EIR and no other CEQA standards
for supplemental review are met. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
Source(s)
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. 2017. “Solid Waste Information
System.” Website: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/Default.htm .
Accessed September 7, 2017.
City of Dublin. Dublin Transit Center EIR, 2002.
Dublin San Ramon Services District. 2017. “Fact Sheet.” Website:
http://www.dsrsd.com/home/showdocument?id=811. Accessed September 7, 2017.
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 518
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
i
t
e
A
-
3
)
)
Figure 1: Project Vicinity and Loca�on Dublin Sta�on
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemp�on
Not to scale
LEGEND
Project Site
Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, 2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 519
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure 2: Dublin Transit Center Land Use Plan Dublin Sta�on
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemp�on
Not to scale
De Marcu
s
Bl
vd
Iron
Ho
r
s
e
Pkwy
Arno
l
d
Bl
vd
LEGEND
Project Site
Dublin Transit Center Project Area
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Public/Semi-Public
Campus Office
Dublin Blvd
A-1 A-2
A-3
B-1/2
E-1
E-2
Campbell Ln
C-1
D-1
D-2
East Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station
Interstate 580
Source: Kimley-Horn and Associates, 2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 520
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Ccpect More. Experience 8e11er. CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Source:BAR Architects,2017
Figure 3: Aerial Perspective
Dublin Station Site Kimley>>>Horn
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 521
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure 4a: Level 1 Floor Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect Mora. Expariaooe Battar.
b
=.W-
:Oor =:=-fl"""'l
l. 1'
&II' CD
£NC If'SAJtM.lCJotiiEOlit«JJCfW1! sz --- 04 U6(81;. 8'
---------------------- c:J== --- -- - -- --- -- - - _n_I_M_ft-=c:J== ------------------ c:J ---------------------'
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 522
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure 4b: Level 3 Floor Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect Mora. Expariaooe Battar.
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 523
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Kimley >>>Horn
Expect More. Experience Better.
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
taa ·T II' !r _ -- --. .---- ------
!
------------------- --- - - --..!.
ZD · • Vl' _! ------ - --------- - lr·.r' S ; n t;r ll ·T ,
"' ..
-l I
lifO
A
A20 b i
b '
l
'
t $-\(C·'.:. '-- -,. -, _j
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
I)()' 01/:T
I.M'• lt /2" n· -r
Q)
Figure 4c: Level 6 Floor Plan
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 524
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure Sa: View From Southeast Corner- Campbell Lane and De Marcus Boulevard
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Ccpect More. Experience 8e11er.
Source:BAR Architects,2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 525
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure Sb: View From Southwest Corner- Campbell Lane
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect Mont. Experience Better.
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 526
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure Sc: View From Northwest Corner- Campbell Lane
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect Mont. Experience Better.
Source: BAR Architects, 2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 527
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Kimley>>>Horn
Ccpect More. Experience 8e11er.
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Source:BAR Architects,2017
Figure Sd: View From Northeast Corner- DeMarcus Boulevard
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 528
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
LA
N
E
WE
S
T
DE
M
A
R
C
U
S
B
O
U
L
E
VAR
D
CA
M
P
B
E
L
L
LN
PERCENT LANDSCAPING LEGEND GENERAL NOTES:
GROUND LEVEL:
69.9% HARDSCAPE, 18,850 SF
25.5% PLANTING AREA, 6,881 SF
3.9% BIORETENTION PLANTER, 1,042 SF
0.7% ARTIFICAL TURF, 185 SF
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
PODIUM:
52.2% HARDSCAPE, 12,778 SF
25.8% RAISED PLANTER, 6,308 SF
11.5% BIORETENTION PLANTER, 2,809 SF
5.5% ARTIFICIAL TURF, 1,355 SF
5.0% POOL, 1,210 SF
CAMELLIA PLACE
PROPERTY LINE
LIMIT OF WORK
1. ALL IRRIGATION AT SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER
PLANTINGS TO BE DRIP IRRIGATION. INDIVIDUAL
BUBBLERS WILL BE PROVIDED AT TREE PLANTINGS.
2. ALL PLANTING AREAS TO INCLUDE 3” LAYER OF 3/8” BLACK
MINI-CHIP MULCH
3. SOIL ANALYSIS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH FINAL LANDSCAPE
PLAN WITH BUILDING PERMIT/IMPROVEMENT PLANS
4. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FALLS TO OWNER
FOR SITE AND SIDEWALK DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE
BUILDING. THE CITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STREET
AND ANY MEDIAN ISLANDS
L2.00
SHARED PRIVATE DRIVE
L5.00 PL
L3.00
WEST PL PODIUM
COURTYARD
EAST
PODIUM PL
COURTYARD
KEY PLAN
SHARED PRIVATE
PL
CAMPBELL LANE SOUTH
L4.00
scale: 1” = 20’ N
Source: Fletcher Studio, 2017
Figure 6: Preliminary Landscape Plan
Dublin Sta�on
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 529
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure 7: Preliminary Grading Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect More. Experience Beller,
---- ).m=_,- =mA _,
.----
1 ,.",, r
'C' (J.J
j r 3 ;,0 1
-Ir
w z <( _J
_J _J w aJ (l_ :;;
<( 0
1-,i:'"
r..J, 3.;o
'
•.L------.-
0 0::
_J ::::l
- I ! (f) ::::l 0 0:: <( :;; w 0
,_
}
CAMPBELL LANE
LEGEND: GRADING NOTES:
I .,.!-..3.4.o .JJo -..q I
t - -----21ll ,
POIEN14L I LUW-IHRU f'LAr-.1"
(SEE: Of: T AIL 1 /C.'> D)
1 hl GRffi r,G \'10111. SHALl Bf IN
Cll:;FOR"'ANCE Wl l'1 THE PR O.£Cl lJo ci'iE:},P;s.
0>1' J C VAriUI, RLUUI"'lMlNlS.
Ex CONroUR
DRIVEWAY DETAIL
1M 10' ?0 0
Source: BKF,2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 530
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure 8: Preliminary Utility Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Ana lysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemptio n
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect More.Experience Better.
I
co·11rcr a
f( g• w
_!!:_ _ _
COI II[CT fO
6" PW ·1 ...++--·u7l··.·P...
I'-·++··- ··-··· '-·--
1· ..........."'
:tl5 U" TRENH: o;;;rr ---.., (r · 001 J!l2.5t)
w z <( ---' ---' -w--' m Q_ ::;;;
<( 0
0 cr <( GJ -=->-' g
UJ => 0 cr <( I ::;;; w 0
I·
PR SA fJITAR ( SEWER UfJE
-··· ··· ··· ·- ··· PR Oct t_TIC 'NA fER W•E
-------- PP "PE WATER LINE
fLO ft-.-THPU PLANIEfo' (SEE DETAIL 1/C5 0)
FRE WA.TEP BAC-FLO'N
PRE\'EfHEf> (BFP) W lH fiRE
OEPARfM DH COr<r,LCnON (fDC)
MA fjH()L( (MH)
POST INDICATOR V.I..L VE (PrV)
1 riOSE 8185 J.!Ll!3E PR0v10ED •N CARAGE fOR PlR00 C 'I.'ASH 0001'1
20 -0 -
Source: BKF,2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 531
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect More.Experience Bener.
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in S upport of a Specifi c Plan E x emption
f
1"-:UJ'
It ---,---- ------ - - ; - -- - ------ -
)
w z :5
j
j w CD 0.. ::;: (]
0 0::
CAMPBELL LANE
t
NO TES:
------ - '..,.,
I I I
'I I I 11
I
I I I I I I I
!....
j ::::> 0 CD
(f) ::::> 0 0:: <( ::;: w 0
L I
I
PROPERf'r' UNC l ThiS PRO.f:Cf OOALIFIC::S f 90 TRANSI T- DF'IEIHE:O OE ,.'ELOPMEIH {TOO) . Cf;l(OTS U"IDER THE MCATEG001 C SPECIAL PROJECT CRIT[RIA
f>R STOP r.1 Dfl:ALJIll
- - - - DR >'.IrJtiGE /,REA BOUNDARY POl[N
II AL rLOW ll i RU Pl..ANl[R (<;E_[ (lllA I L 1, SHEET 5.1)
J:ll!LOlllilll5 -.-sor. - LOCATION
..-20)1'; - OENSI TJ
+2tr.":- PA •NG
+91):'; - TOTAl CREDI TS
,.11Tt11N 0.25 IW .£5 OF tX:ST'NG TR.ti.NSIT rlUB j
> 60 DU j.o\.C] [0AT-GRADE PAR II-.:Gl
l
IMPERVIOUS RODr AR£1-. ORMI NG
TO Fl ()W-lRU PI...AIHFR
PIIERVIO,JS PAVEMErJT ORA INI'>JG
TO LANDSCPE \\HH 2:1 RATIO
OR AJW<GE. DIPECTH.X\/ASl LOPE
2 i-LOW TH"'U Pt..A.NTERS f..ND BIORE ilNTI ON A.RE.AS ARE SIZED FOR: ,.; OF IH I I?[RVIOUS AR(A DRAINING TO TH[I f"(R TH[ FLO'N TR(AiM(NT SI;:INC
t_fHOO """"- -0- 20 ,
Source:BKF, 2017
Figure 9: Preliminary Storm Water Control Plan
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 532
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure 10: Preliminary Erosion Control Plan
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley >>>Horn
Expect More. Experience Better.
:;
C AMPBELL LANE
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
0 0::
w -' ::J 0co
({) ::J () 0:: <>: ::2 w 0
......
FIBLRf-<OLLPmCITYSllJ. PLAN
C0-702
INLf_f '>EDI M E>.,JT [jAF<RIEf< PH< PLAN CD-703
1 >'I,UI'O LO IMI'IWVLMLNIS AJ-(L ':iHU Wr>< WITHIN IHl Llf./1 Ul WOi<K_ CUNTI<AC:lUT< ';HALL IN':>TALL AN:J
MUUI ' 'T' EIW::>UN CONHWL Mc_A:::.L-Rl':i M':i NLCLS:::.AI'Y UNTIL l'f<UJLCl CLOSL OUT
CONSrRuCTION FE'NCING WITH PR IVACY
(GREE) SCREEN 3 CONIRAC!OR SIIALL PLACE STABILillO CONSTRUCTION lNlRAr\C[ AS NE.EDED f-'[R
DETAIL 3/C6' UNTIL BUILDING SLAEJ HAS BEEt-. POURED
SIAl:RILIU CUNSIIWCIIU"' LNIIIANCc
f'LR CIIY SIU I'LAN CU-/CJ1 4 ALL NEW ONSITE STOR ORAIN STRuCTURES SHALL BE CAPPED OR PLUGGED UNTIL SITE IS STAB,LIZED OR FITTED W1Trl APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
20 0 !"""..=-
1"=20'
Source: BKF, 2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 533
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Figure 11: Fault Trench Locations
Dublin Station
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
Kimley>>>Horn
Expect More. Experience Better.
EXPLANATION
Pleaoant fauR aoe. c!a'hed where inferred.
[J.Jer1ed \ldlere UlCef1ain
Fault trench a gnment and locations. Bertogar.
S<Mms & Associates, 2013
Note·
Fault 1rench locailons as clepicted on Plato 2
(Berlogar, Slovens & Associates.March 20 13)
and Plate 4 (Berlogar, Stevens & Associates,
March 2012).
Appro>cimate scale
UOR DUBLIN STATION
Dublin, Cali fornia
FAULT TRENCH LOCATIONS BY OTHERS FOR DUBLIN STATION AND VICINITY
Source: Langan, 2017
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 534
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Source: FEMA, 2017
Figure 12: Flood Hazard Area
LEGEND
Project Site
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
(500 Year Flood Hazard)
1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
(100 Year Flood Hazard)
Dublin Sta�on
CEQA Analysis in Support of a Specific Plan Exemption
6.1.j
Packet Pg. 535
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
0
.
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
E
Q
A
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
U
p
d
a
t
e
(
A
s
h
t
o
n
a
t
D
u
b
l
i
n
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Page 1 of 8
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Amendments to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.04 (Encroachments),
Chapter 8.92 (Wireless Communication Facilities), Chapter 8.36
(Development Regulations) and Chapter 8.104 (Site Development
Review) Pertaining to Wireless Communication Facilities Effective
Citywide
Prepared by: Amy Million, Principal Planner and Laurie Sucgang, Senior
Civil Engineer
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code related to
wireless communication facilities on private property and within the public right-of-way.
This includes amendments to Chapter 7.04 (Encroachments), Chapter 8.92 (Wireless
Communication Facilities), Chapter 8.36 (Development Regulations) and Chapter 8.104
(Site Development Review). The proposed amendments are necessary in order to
comply with the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Act), and further
clarifies the regulation of wireless communications facilities located on private property
and in the public right-of-way. The Act restricts local regulation of wireless
communication facilities and provides an expedited permitting process under certain
circumstances.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate, waive the reading and INTRODUCE an
Ordinance Amending Chapter 7.04 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to
Development and Encroachment Permits for Wireless Communications Facilities, and
waive the reading an INTRODUCE an Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.92, 8.36, and
8.104 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to Development of Wireless
Communications Facilities,
effective city-wide.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
Page 2 of 8
DESCRIPTION:
Background
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the “Telecom Act”) was signed into law by
President Clinton in February 1996 and reflected the changes and rapid growth of
telecommunications technologies. Under the Telecom Act, local zoning authorities were
granted the ability to regulate the location and design of wireless communication
facilities within their jurisdictional area through a discretionary permit process.
In response to the Telecom Act, the City of Dublin amended the Dublin Municipal Code
(DMC) to adopt the Wireless Communication Facilities Ordinance (DMC Chapter 8.92)
in October 2000. The purpose and intent of the Ordinance was to provide a uniform and
comprehensive set of standards for the development and installation of wireless
communication facilities and to protect and promote public health, safety, community
welfare and aesthetic qualities in the City.
Since adoption of the Telecom Act and DMC Chapter 8.92, wireless technology has
substantially changed. For example, in recent years, wireless carriers are seeking to
install smaller wireless communication facilities in the public right-of-way. These “small
cell facilities” are integrated into the carrier’s existing wireless network to increase
capacity. Concurrent with the new technology, there have been changes in wireless
facilities law at both the federal and state levels. The DMC does not address these new
technologies or new regulations, most notably Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax
Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012.
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act
The U.S. Congress adopted the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012
(Act) which established additional regulations of wireless facilities and expedited
permitting process for modification of and collocation to existing facilities. Section
6409(a) of the Act established new requirements for modification and collocation of
existing wireless telecommunication towers and base stations.
The Act restricts local land use authority and states that a local government may not
deny, and shall approve, any “eligible facilities request” for a modification of an existing
wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimension
of such tower or base station.
An “eligible facilities request” refers to any request for modification of an existing
wireless tower or base station that involves:
Collocation of new transmission equipment,
Removal of transmission equipment, or
Replacement of transmission equipment.
For the purposes of this Staff Report, the following terms are described and simplified
as follows:
“Collocation” refers to the mounting of a wireless communication facility on the
same tower or structure as an existing wireless communication facility.
6.2
Packet Pg. 537
Page 3 of 8
“Tower” refers to a pole, mast, monopole, lattice tower, etc.
“Base station” refers to any structure that is not a tower.
Section 6409(a) of the Act does not define what constitutes a “substantial change” to an
existing tower or base station. However, the Federal Communication Commission
(FCC) issued rules and clarifications for modification of wireless telecommunication
facilities that defined “substantial change”. According to the FCC, a modification
substantially changes the physical dimension of a wireless tower or base station if it
meets any one of the following criteria:
Type of
Modification:
Type of Facility:
Towers (outside the public right-
of-way)
Towers (inside the public
right-of-way) and all Base
Stations
Height More than 10% or one additional
antenna array with the separation
from the nearest antenna is more
than 20 feet
More than 10% or 10 feet,
whichever is greater
Width More than 20 feet, or more than
the width of the tower, whichever
is greater
More than 6 feet
Equipment
Cabinets
Installation of more than 4
cabinets.
Installation of any equipment
cabinets if there are no pre-
existing ground cabinets, or
ground cabinets that are more
than 10% larger in height or
overall volume than any other
ground cabinets
Excavation/
Deployment
Beyond Site
Excavation or deployment outside
of the current boundaries of the
leased or owned property
surrounding the tower and any
access or utility easements
Excavation or deployment
beyond the area in proximity to
the structure/equipment
Defeat
Concealment
Elements
Defeat the concealment elements of the wireless tower or base
station
Defeat Other
Conditions
Not comply with the condition of approval, unless the non -
compliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width,
addition of cabinets, or new excavation that does not exceed the
‘substantial change’ thresholds.
Regardless of the above, all modifications remain subject to building codes and other
non-discretionary structural and safety codes.
6.2
Packet Pg. 538
Page 4 of 8
Proposals Requiring Expedited Processing Under §6409(a)
Under the Act, the City must act on an application for a Section 6409(a) modification
within 60 days unless the City notifies the applicant within 30 days that the specific
information in the application is incomplete. After the applicant makes a supplemental
filing, the agency has 10 days to notify the applicant if the application remains
incomplete. If no decision on the application is made during the 60-day review period
(approval or denial), the request is “deemed granted.”
Current Request
The DMC regulates wireless communication facilities in the public right-of-way (Title 7
Public Works) and on private property (Title 8 Zoning). Staff is proposing amendments
to both sections of the DMC in order to ensure that the City’s wireless regulations are in
compliance with federal regulations, and to further clarify our local regulations.
ANALYSIS:
The following is an overview of the proposed amendments to Title 7 (Public Works) and
Title 8 (Zoning Ordinance) to address wireless communication facilities in the public
right-of-way and on private property. For the complete Ordinance amendments, please
refer to Attachments 1 and 2.
Encroachments (Chapter 7.04)
A new permit, Personal Wireless Service Facility Permit, is proposed to specifically
address the application, development standards, review process, notification
requirements, and permit issuance for wireless communication facilities within the public
right-of-way, which is intended to be a sub-category or type of encroachment permit.
Modifications to DMC Chapter 7.04 (Encroachments) included added terms and
definitions related to the new permit, clarification of the use of the term “facilities” to
include both above-ground and below-ground facilities, clarification on the potential
denial of proposed street cuts or trenches on newly paved or treated streets,
requirement for obtaining a Personal Wireless Service Facility Permit to construct,
install, or maintain such a facility, and development standards for the size, shape, color,
and height of the facilities.
Please refer to Attachment 1 for the proposed amendments to DMC Title 7.
Wireless Communication Facilities (Chapter 8.92)
Staff completed a comprehensive review of the existing ordinance (Chapter 8.92) and
evaluated ways to clarify the regulations and simplify the implementation of those
regulations. As a result, sections of the existing ordinance were reorganized, relocated,
and/or removed. For example, language was simplified; where there were consistent
themes in the criteria or regulations they were consolidated (i.e. design based
regulations were moved to Design Criteria and location-based criteria were move to
Location Criteria) and duplicative regulations were removed.
6.2
Packet Pg. 539
Page 5 of 8
Definitions (Section 8.92.030)
The City’s existing ordinance has a multitude of definitions for the technical terms
related to wireless communication facilities. The proposed ordinance simplifies these
definitions and eliminates the overly technical terms that have no relationship to the
aesthetics of a facility, which is what the ordinance regulates.
Application Requirements (Section 8.92.060)
Section 6409(a) of the federally adopted Act, limits the application materials that the
City can require for qualified modifications and collocations. The City may require an
application, but may only seek documentation about whether the facility meets Section
6409(a) requirements. The City may not require documentation proving the need for the
proposed modification or collocation. In response, the draft ordinance separates the
application requirements for new facilities and modifications, and the application
requirements for facilities which qualify under Section 6904(a).
Development Regulations (Chapter 8.36)
Staff is also proposing amendments to the Development Regulations Ordinance (DMC
Chapter 8.36) to ensure internal consistency in the Zoning Ordinance to clarify that the
height limit exceptions (Section 8.36.110.C.3.c) do not apply to new wireless
communication facilities. Instead, new wireless communication facilities are solely
regulated by Chapter 8.92 and are limited to the height for the district in which they are
located. However, it should be noted that modifications to existing wireless
communication facilities that qualify under Section 6409(a), may exceed the height
limits established by the Zoning Ordinance.
Site Development Review (Chapter 8.104)
The proposed amendments to Chapter 8.104 clarify the approval authority for wireless
communications facilities (new facilities, collocations, modifications and Section 6409(a)
modifications), and ensure compliance with federal law as well as internal consistency
with the proposed amendments to Chapter 8.92 as described above.
The proposed amendments exempt minor modifications to approved facilities from a
Site Development Review Permit (SDR) if not visible from the public right-of-way.
Otherwise, a Site Development Review Waiver is required for modifications that are
consistent with an approved Site Development Review Permit.
The proposed ordinance amends the review process to provide for expedited
processing under Section 6409(a), by requiring a Site Development Review Waiver for
such applications. The ordinance also requires applicants to demonstrate that their
proposals meet the criteria for streamlined processing under Section 6409(a) as a part
of their application.
All other new or modified facilities would continue to require a Site Development Review
Permit from the Community Development Director.
Please refer to Attachment 2 for the proposed amendments to DMC Title 8.
6.2
Packet Pg. 540
Page 6 of 8
STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH:
On October 17, 2017, the City received a letter from Verizon Wireless that raised a
number of legal and policy issues. As a result, the City Council continued the public
hearing to December 5, 2017 to allow Staff time to meet with the interested wireless
carriers to discuss the draft ordinance.
On November 3, 2017, Staff met with representatives from Verizon Wireless, AT&T
Mobility, and Mobilitie. The focus of the discussion was on the modifications to Title 7
pertaining to wireless facilities in the public right-of-way and more specifically drafting
the ordinance to provide flexibility in the regulations to allow for changes in technology
and the carriers’ individual needs. Staff also evaluated the legal issues presented in
Verizon’s letter. As a result, minor modifications to the draft ordinance are
recommended including clarifications to the permit requirements provided in draft
Section 7.04.430.B and the development standards provided in draft Section 7.04.440.
A final version of the draft ordinance with all recommended changes is attached to this
report (Attachment 1).
In addition to the changes to Title 7, one change to Title 8 was requested to allow
wireless facilities on non-residential parcels in residential zoning districts. The draft
ordinance attached to this Staff Report maintains the City’s current policy that prohibits
wireless facilities on private property in all residential zoning districts and comparable
Planned Development zoning districts. The carriers requested the City’s consideration
of the following two alternatives in an effort to allow for these facilities in residential
zoning districts:
1. Provide for an exception pursuant to the Telecom Act. As previously stated, the
City may not prohibit the installation of wireless facilities and limiting their
placement in the City may effectively do that. The carriers proposed that
wireless communication facilities be prohibited in all residential zoning districts
and comparable Planned Development zoning districts, unless a Telecom Act
exception is approved by the City. The applicant would have the burden of
proving that not allowing wireless facilities on private property in the residential
districts would violate the Telecom Act and that no other viable alternative exists
which would make the approval of a Telecom Act exception unnecessary; OR
2. Allow fully-concealed facilities on non-residential parcels located in all residential
zoning districts and comparable Planned Development zoning districts. This
would allow fully-concealed facilities on non-residential parcels, such as
churches and private schools, through a Site Development Review process.
Should the City Council want to consider one of these alternatives, Staff recommends
that the City Council approve the draft ordinance and direct Staff to prepare a future
amendment to that ordinance to implement this request. The new ordinance reflecting
the requested changes to the Zoning Ordinance would be presented to the Planning
Commission for their consideration and recommendation before returning to City
Council for final action.
6.2
Packet Pg. 541
Page 7 of 8
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:
The Planning Commission considered to amendments to DMC Title 8 Zoning Ordinance
(Chapters 8.36, 8.92 and 8.104) on September 26, 2017. The Planning Commission’s
review excluded the review of the proposed changes to Chapter 7.04 as facilities within
the public rights-of-way are regulated by the Public Works Department and are outside
the purview of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission unanimously
recommended approval of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance with a
minor modification to waive the alternative site analysis for facilities that are fully-
concealed from view. Staff supports the proposed modification (Attachments 3 and 4).
CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, SPECIFIC PLAN AND ZONING
ORDINANCE:
The proposed amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code are consistent with the Dublin
General Plan, all applicable Specific Plans and the Zoning Ordinance in that the
Amendments are consistent with applicable land use designations and general
development policies. The amendments also include minor revisions for internal
consistency within the Dublin Municipal Code.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
In accordance with State law, a public notice of the October 17, 2017 City Council
meeting was published in the East Bay Times and posted at several locations
throughout the City. The Public Notice was provided to all persons who have expressed
an interest in being notified of meetings. At the October 17, 2017 meeting, City Council
continued the item to December 5, 2017. No additional public notice was published. The
Staff Report for this public hearing was also made available on the City’s website.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State Guidelines and
City Environmental Regulations require that certain projects be reviewed for
environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. Pursuant to the
CEQA, Staff is recommending that the project be found exempt in accordance with
CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the
amendments to Title 8 of the Dublin Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) will not have a
significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to the FCC, changes to an existing
telecommunications facility that complies with Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax
Relief and Job Creation Act, are considered minor changes and amending the Zoning
Ordinance to comply with this Federal law would not impact the environment. As such,
the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment is not subject to CEQA.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Ordinance Amending Chapter 7.04 of the Dublin Municipal Code Relating to
Wireless Communications Facilities in the Public Right of Way
2. Draft Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.92, 8.36, and 8.104 of the Dublin Municipal
Code Relating to Wireless Communications Facilities on Private Property
3. Planning Commission Minutes 09.26.17
6.2
Packet Pg. 542
Page 8 of 8
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-10 Recommending Approval of the
Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance
6.2
Packet Pg. 543
ORDINANCE NO. XX-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
AMENDING CHAPTER 7.04 OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS FOR WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
The City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 7.04 (Encroachments) of the Dublin Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Article I. General Provisions
7.04.010 Definitions.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the definitions contained in this section shall govern the
construction of this chapter:
“Antenna” shall have the meaning given that term in Section 8.92.030 of this Code.
“City Engineer” means the City Engineer or his designee.
“Encroach” or “encroachment” means and includes going upon, over, under, or using any street
in such a manner as to prevent, obstruct, or interfere with its normal use, including but not
limited to the performance thereon of any of the following acts:
A. Excavating, filling or disturbing the street;
B. Erecting or maintaining any post, pole, fence, guard rail, wall, loading platform, or
other structure on, over, or under the street;
C. Planting any tree, shrub, or other growing thing within the street;
D. Placing or leaving on the street any rubbish, brush, earth, or other material of any
nature whatever;
E. Constructing, placing, or maintaining on, over, under, or within the street any
pathway, sidewalk, driveway, or other surfacing, any culvert or other surface drainage, or
subsurface drainage facility, any pipe, conduit, wire, or cable;
F. Lighting or building a fire;
G. Constructing, placing, planting, or maintaining any structure, embankment,
excavation, tree, or other object adjacent to the street which causes or will cause an
encroachment; or
H. Placing or causing to be placed any material, machinery, or apparatus on the street
for building, paving, or other purposes for over twenty-four (24) hours.
“Permittee” means any person that proposes to do work or encroach upon a street as herein
defined and has been issued a permit for said encroachment by the City Engineer.
“Person” means any individual, firm, partnership, association, or corporation, including any
public agency or utility, or any agent or representative thereof and includes successors in
interest.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 544
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
"Personal Wireless Service" means commercial mobile telecommunications services provided
by a telephone or telegraph corporation under a certificate of public convenience and necessity
issued by the California Public Utilities Commission.
"Personal Wireless Service Facility" means a facility that transmits and/or receives telephonic
or other wireless signals, including antennas, equipment, related facilities and appurtenances
thereof used to provide or facilitate the provision of Personal Wireless Service.
"Personal Wireless Service Facility Permit” means a permit issued pursuant to this Chapter
authorizing a Permittee to construct, install, and maintain a Personal Wireless Service Facility
within the full width of the right-of-way of any street, as defined in the California Vehicle Code.
“Street” means the full width of the right-of-way of any street, as defined in the California Vehicle
Code, used by the general public, whether or not such street has been accepted as and
declared to be part of the city system of streets including streets forming a part of the state
highway system. “Street” also includes easements where the city is the grantee of the easement
and property owned by the city.
7.04.020 Applicability.
A. This chapter shall not apply to any officer or employee of the city acting in the discharge of
his official duties to any work being performed by any person or persons, firm or corporation
under contract with the city; when permission to encroach has been expressly granted by the
City Council; to a permanent projection from buildings as permitted by Section 7.32.340 and
Section 7.32.370 or to temporary pedestrian protection permitted by Section 7.32.290.
B. This chapter shall not prevent any person from maintaining any pipe or conduit lawfully on
or under the street, or from making excavation, as may be necessary, for the preservation of life
or property when an urgent necessity therefor arises provided that such person shall notify the
City Engineer by telephone the day such work is performed or the day the offices of the city are
again opened. Such person shall then apply on the proper form within five (5) working days
confirming the work performed.
7.04.030 Streets—Right of lawful use.
Any permit granted under this chapter shall be subject to the right of the city or any other person
entitled thereto to use that part of the street for any purpose for which it may be lawfully used,
and no part of the street shall be unduly obstructed at any time. All work or use shall be planned
and executed in a manner that will least interfere with the safe and convenient travel of the
general public.
7.04.040 Prohibited encroachments.
No application will be approved nor permit issued for constructing or maintaining a loading
platform upon or in any street or for erecting or maintaining therein or thereon a post, pole,
column, or structure for support for advertising signs except as provided in Section 7.04.080.
7.04.050 Liability for damages—Insurance required.
A. Permittee shall be responsible for all liability for personal injury or property damage which
may result from work permitted and done by permittee under the permit, or proximately caused
by failure on permittee’s part to perform his obligations under said permit in respect to
maintenance. If any claim of such liability is made against the city, its officers, or employees
permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold them and each of them, harmless from such claim
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 545
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
including any claim based on the active or passive negligence of the city, its officers or
employees, insofar as permitted by law.
B. Permittee shall be required to show evidence of public liability insurance in such form and
amount as may be required by the City Engineer to protect the city, its officials, officers,
directors, employees, and agents from claims which may arise from permittee’s operations
under the permit.
7.04.060 Completion of work by city.
If the work or use authorized by a permit is unsafe, in violation of this chapter, or is unduly
delayed by the permittee, the City Engineer may, upon written notice, revoke the permit and
complete the work or any portion thereof, or make the site safe or return it to the same condition
existing prior thereto. The actual cost of performing such work by the city plus overhead shall be
charged to and paid for by the permittee.
7.04.070 Signs on public property.
A. No person, except a duly authorized public officer or employee, shall paint, mark, or write
on, or post or otherwise affix, any handbill or sign to or upon any public property including, but
not limited to any sidewalk, crosswalk, curb, curbstone, street, hydrant, tree, shrub, tree stake or
guard, railroad trestle, electric light pole, telephone pole, or power pole, traffic signal pole, public
bridge, drinking fountain, street sign, or traffic sign.
B. Any handbill or sign found posted or otherwise affixed upon any public property contrary to
the provisions of this section may be removed by the city. The person responsible for any such
illegal posting shall be liable for the cost incurred in the removal thereof and the City Manager or
his designee is authorized to effect the collection of said cost.
C. Nothing in this section shall apply to the installation of a metal plaque or plate in a sidewalk
commemorating an historical cultural or artistic event location or person for which the City
Manager or his designee has granted approval.
D. Nothing in this section shall apply to the painting of house numbers upon curbs done in
accordance with the provisions of Section 7.04.110.
E. Nothing in this section shall apply to the temporary markings placed by the owners of
subsurface installations pursuant to Government Code Section 4216.
7.04.080 Public service banners.
A. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7.04.070 hereof, public service banners may be
placed within any public street, alley, or other public property upon issuance of an
encroachment permit by the City Engineer. In issuing such an encroachment permit, the City
Engineer shall consider the safety of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, the prevention of damage
to public property, the aesthetic conditions of a particular neighborhood and the public health,
safety, and welfare.
B. As used herein, “public service banner” shall mean temporary banners of nonprofit public
welfare organizations and public service groups which advertise events of community interest.
C. The City Manager may, in his discretion, adopt a policy regulating the installation,
maintenance, and removal of public service banners.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 546
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
7.04.090 Maintenance of records.
All permittees and other persons maintaining permanent facilities within a street shall keep up-
to-date records of the location and description of all such facilities which records shall be
furnished to the City Engineer upon request. As used herein, “facilities” means both above-
ground and below-ground facilities, including, but not be limited to, pipes, wires, and tanks.
7.04.100 Mailbox placement.
All mail boxes shall be placed in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States
Post Office Department, but no box shall be so placed within the street as to endanger the life or
safety of the traveling public.
7.04.110 Markings on streets and curbs.
It is unlawful for any person, without first obtaining a permit under this chapter, to solicit on a
commercial or donation basis, to place or maintain any number, figure, letter, carving, drawing,
design, or other marking upon any street; except that markings for the purpose of identifying
survey, utility, or construction locations shall not be subject to this chapter. A permit for placing
or maintaining numbers, figures, letters, carvings, drawings, designs or other markings under
this chapter may be issued only to nonprofit organizations which have their principal and
permitted meeting place within city limits and have been organized and established within the
city for a minimum of one (1) year continuously preceding application for a permit.
7.04.120 Monuments.
Any monument of granite, concrete, iron, or other lasting material set for the purpose of locating
or preserving the lines and/or elevation of any street, property subdivision, or a precise survey
point or reference point shall not be removed or disturbed or caused to be removed or disturbed
without first obtaining permission from the City Engineer to do so. Replacement of removed or
disturbed monuments will be at the expense of the permittee.
7.04.130 Hedges, fences, shrubbery and lawns.
A. No tree, fence, or similar structure, shall be planted, erected, or maintained in a street
without a permit. No encroachment of any nature will be permitted or maintained which
impedes, obstructs, or denies such pedestrian or other lawful travel, or which impairs adequate
sight distance for safe pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
B. Maintenance. The permittee or property owner shall maintain all hedges, shrubs, walls,
fences, or similar structures erected for landscaping purposes in a neat and orderly condition; if
such structures are not so maintained, the City Engineer may direct that permittee or property
owner to remove the same and restore the street to its former condition, at the expense of the
permittee or property owner.
C. Lawns. Any person otherwise entitled to may maintain a lawn of any grass or type not
prohibited by other law, within the street without a permit. The lawn shall not extend into the
roadway or walkway nor into the drainage ditches, gutter, or other drainage facilities.
7.04.140 Trees.
The applicant for a permit to plant trees in the right-of-way of a public highway shall show in his
application the exact location of and the kind of tree to be planted. If trees are planted within the
public right-of-way and within five (5) feet of a public sidewalk and/or curb, the City Engineer
may require a root barrier to be installed with the tree(s). No change shall be made in either
location of trees or in kinds of trees without the approval of the City Engineer. The trees shall
remain the property of the permittee who shall pay the cost of planting the trees and shall bear
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 547
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
the cost of their maintenance. The City Engineer, at his sole discretion, may require the
permittee to remove the trees at his sole expense if necessary for public safety or convenience.
7.04.150 Storage on street or sidewalk prohibited.
No person shall store any item of business inventory, including vehicles, upon any street or
sidewalk.
Article II. Permit Requirements
7.04.160 Permit—Required.
A. No person shall encroach or cause to be made any encroachment of any nature whatever
within, upon, over, or under the limits of any street in the city, or make or cause to be made any
alteration of any nature within, upon, over, or under such street; or construct, put upon, maintain
or leave thereon, or cause to be constructed, put upon, maintained, or left thereon, any
obstruction or impediment of any nature whatever; or remove, cut or trim trees thereon; or set a
fire thereon; or place on, over or under such street any pipe line, conduit, or other fixture; or
place any structure, wall, culvert, or similar encroachment, or make any excavation or
embankment in such a way as to endanger the normal usage of the street without having first
obtained a permit as required in this chapter.
B. No person shall construct, install, or maintain a Personal Wireless Service Facility within,
upon, over, or under the limits of any street in the city without first obtaining a Personal Wireless
Service Facility Permit. Unless expressly set forth herein, all provisions of this chapter shall
apply to Personal Wireless Service Facility Permits and applications therefor.
7.04.170 Permit—Application—Generally.
The City Engineer shall provide an application form which shall contain such information as in
the judgment of the City Engineer is necessary, including information to establish the exact
location, nature, dimensions, duration, and purpose of the proposed use or encroachment. The
application shall be filed with the City Engineer.
7.04.180 Permit—Application—Required documents.
A. The application shall be accompanied by maps, plats, sketches, diagrams or similar
exhibits to the size and in the quantity as the City Engineer shall prescribe on which shall be
plainly shown any and all information necessary to locate, delineate, illustrate, or identify the
proposed use or encroachment and the right of the applicant to so use or encroach thereon.
B. The applicant shall be accompanied by the written order or consent to any work thereunder
which may be required by law or any other public agency or body.
7.04.190 Action on application.
Applications may be approved, conditionally approved, or denied. The City Engineer shall act on
the application within thirty (30) working days. Where the City Engineer finds that the
requirements of this chapter have been met and the required fees and charges have been paid,
he shall issue a permit for the use or encroachment attaching such conditions as he may deem
necessary for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and for the protection of the city. If the
City Engineer finds the requirements of this chapter have not been met, he shall deny the
permit, giving the reasons therefor in writing. The City Engineer may deny a permit where
trenching or cutting a street is required where the street overlay or preventative maintenance
treatment, such as a slurry seal, or equivalent was completed within five years or three years,
respectively.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 548
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
7.04.200 Permit issuance—Fees and charges.
A. Fees for issuance of the permit and charges shall be established by the City Council from
time to time by resolution upon recommendation of the City Engineer.
B. A public agency which is authorized by law to establish or maintain any works or facilities
in, under, or over any public street shall not be subject to a fee for issuance of a permit but shall
be required to pay all other charges. A public agency or utility may at the option of the City
Engineer arrange to be billed for the required fees and charges.
7.04.210 Bond—Required.
A. Prior to issuance of a permit, unless waived by the City Engineer, the permittee shall
deposit with the city cash, a certified or cashier’s check, or an approved surety bond in a sum to
be fixed by the City Engineer as sufficient to reimburse the city for costs of restoring the street to
its former condition. If the permittee anticipates applying for a number of permits throughout the
year, he may file a cash deposit or approved surety bond in a sum estimated by the City
Engineer as sufficient to cover the permittee’s activities during any twelve (12) month period.
B. The City Engineer may require an additional bond or cash deposit at any time when in his
opinion the amount of the bond or cash deposit previously made is insufficient.
7.04.220 Bond—Condition.
The condition of any bond or cash deposit made pursuant to this Article shall be that the
permittee will diligently and with good faith comply with this chapter and the terms and
conditions of the permit.
7.04.230 Bond—Payable to city—Term.
Any bond or cash deposit required by the City Engineer pursuant to this chapter shall be
payable to the city. Upon satisfactory completion of all work authorized in the permit, and
fulfillment of all conditions of the permit, including the guaranty period set forth in Section
7.04.370 the bond or cash deposit will be released, provided that the City Engineer may, in his
discretion, allow the earlier release of the bond or cash deposit.
7.04.240 Bond—Exclusions.
Cash deposits or bonds will not be required of any public utility holding a franchise with the City
or public agency which is authorized by law to establish or maintain any works or facilities in,
under, or over any street.
7.04.250 Permit—Term.
The permittee shall complete the work or use authorized by a permit issued pursuant to this
chapter within ninety (90) days from date of issuance, unless a different period is stated in the
permit. If the work or use is not completed within ninety (90) days or within the time stated in the
permit, then the permit shall become void, and the City Engineer may restore the street in
accordance with Section 7.04.060. An extension of time for good cause may be granted by the
City Engineer when requested in writing.
7.04.260 Permit—Display required.
The permittee shall keep any permit at the work site, and the permit must be shown to any
authorized representative of the City Engineer or law enforcement officer on demand.
7.04.270 Changes in permit.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 549
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
No changes may be made in the location, dimension, character, or duration of the
encroachment or use as granted by the permit except upon written authorization of the City
Engineer.
7.04.280 Permit—Nontransferable.
No permit issued pursuant to this chapter shall be transferable or assignable to any other
person.
7.04.290 Other permit issuance—Not compliance with this chapter.
Issuance of a building permit, electrical permit, plumbing permit, demolition permit, or any other
permit which may be required by law at the same location and in connection with the same
activity for which a permit would be issued hereunder shall not constitute authorization to
encroach on any street.
Article III. Performance of Work
7.04.300 Standards and specifications.
The City Engineer shall from time to time establish such standards and specifications as he
deems necessary for the proper construction, use, and maintenance of encroachments and for
the safety, protection and convenience of the public, which standards and specifications shall be
applicable to all permittees. Any work or use done under all permits shall conform to the city’s
standard plans and specifications unless otherwise required by the City Engineer. If inadequate
provision is made for the safety, protection and convenience of the public by the permittee, the
City Engineer may take such action as he deems necessary for the protection of the public and
shall charge the permittee therefor.
7.04.310 Safety laws—Compliance required.
The permittee shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations,
including Department of Industrial Relations of the state of California (CAL-OSHA) rules and
regulations.
7.04.320 Inspections.
The permittee shall allow the City Engineer to inspect any or all work done pursuant to the
permit at reasonable times.
7.04.330 Commencement of work—Notification required.
A. The permittee shall notify the City Engineer at least twenty-four (24) hours in advance of
beginning work. If appropriate, the permittee shall give such advance notice as may be required
by the City Engineer to the Police Department and/or Fire Department of the location and nature
of the proposed work.
B. In addition to subsection A, the permittee of Personal Wireless Service Facility Permit shall
comply with the public notification requirements of Section 7.04.450.
7.04.340 Restoration of street.
Upon completion of the work, acts, or things for which the permit was issued, or when required
by the City Engineer, the permittee shall replace, repair, or restore the street at the place of
work to the same condition existing prior there to, unless otherwise provided in the permit. The
permittee shall remove all obstructions, impediments, material or rubbish caused to be or placed
upon the street under the permit, and shall do any other work or perform any act necessary to
restore the street to a safe and usable condition.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 550
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
7.04.350 Drainage requirements.
If the work, use or encroachment authorized in the permit shall interfere with the established
drainage, the permittee shall provide for proper drainage as directed by the City Engineer.
7.04.360 Completion of work—Notification required.
Upon completion of all work authorized in the permit, the permittee shall notify the City Engineer
in writing. No work shall be deemed to be completed until such notification of completion is
given and final inspection has been made by the City Engineer unless such final inspection is
waived by the City Engineer in writing.
7.04.370 Guaranty period.
A. After completion of all work, the permittee shall exercise reasonable care in monitoring and
maintaining the area affected by the encroachment. For a period of two (2) years after final
inspection of the work by the City Engineer or the date of waiver of final inspection, the
permittee shall repair any injury or damage to any portion of the street which occurs as the
result of work done under the permit, including any and all injury or damage to the street which
would not have occurred had such work not been done. Any public utility, public agency,
franchisee, or Personal Wireless Service Facility permittee which is authorized by law or
contract to establish or maintain any works or facilities in, under, or over any street shall
monitor, maintain, and/or repair the street or any portion of it where the public utility, public
agency, permittee, or franchisee has made any excavation for the life of any works or facilities
contained in or under the street.
B. The permittee shall repair any injury or damage in any portion of the street, resulting from
the work done under the permit within the period of time required by the City Engineer. In the
event that the permittee fails to act timely or should repair or replacement be required before the
permittee can be notified or can respond to notification, the city may make or cause to be mad e
the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and the permittee shall
be charged with all the expenses incurred in the performance of said work, including overhead.
7.04.380 Relocation or removal of encroachments.
If any future construction, reconstruction, or maintenance work by the city or required by the city
on a street requires the relocation, removal, or abandonment of installations or encroachments
in, on, over, or under a street, the permittee owning, controlling, or maintaining such installations
or encroachments shall relocate, remove, or abandon the same at his sole expense unless
otherwise required by law. When removal, relocation, or abandonment is required, the City
Engineer shall give such permittee a written demand specifying the place of relocation, or that
the installations or encroachment must be removed or abandoned. If said permittee fails to
comply with said instructions, the city may cause the removal, relocation, or abandonment of the
encroachment at the expense of the permittee.
Article IV. Sidewalks, Driveways, Curbs
7.04.390 Permit—Required.
It is declared to be unlawful for any person to repair or construct, or cause to be repaired or
constructed by private contract in the city any sidewalk, driveway, curb, gutter, or paving, or to
cut any curb for the purpose of constructing a driveway, or to begin excavation for the purpose
of constructing a sidewalk, driveway, curb, gutter, or paving within any street without first
obtaining a permit as required in Article II of this chapter.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 551
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
7.04.400 Removal of driveway.
When a driveway shall permanently cease to be used, the curb cut therefor, and all or a portion
of the driveway, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be removed and standard curb,
gutter, and sidewalk shall be constructed. The property owner shall remove the curb cut and
driveway and construct curb, gutter, and sidewalk, or cause same to be removed or
constructed, within thirty (30) days of receiving written notice from the City Engineer to do so.
Should the property owner fail to perform such work or cause it to be performed within said thirty
(30) days, the City Engineer shall have such work done at the expense of the property owner.
The provisions of this section shall apply to all existing driveways whether or not the use thereof
was heretofore abandoned, as well as to all such driveways which are constructed after the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter.
7.04.405 Closure of hazardous driveways.
When a driveway is determined by the City Council to cause a hazardous condition, the curb cut
therefor, and all or a portion of the driveway as determined by the City Council, shall be
removed and standard curb, gutter and sidewalk shall be constructed. Prior to any action being
taken on closure of a driveway under this section, the following conditions shall be met:
A. The City Council shall conduct a public hearing for the purpose of reviewing the
recommendation for closure and shall determine whether the closure is appropriate.
B. An alternate source of access to the property shall be available or shall be provided by the
city.
C. The city shall bear the expense of closure of the hazardous driveway and of providing any
alternate access that is necessary. The city shall approve any plans, specifications and
estimates prior to work being performed or shall contract for the work according to the terms of
Chapter 2.36 of this code (purchasing regulations).
7.04.410 Denial of building permit while sidewalk incomplete.
No building permit shall be issued under the terms of this code for construction, additions or
remodeling on any lot, tract, or parcel of land on the street frontage of which the sidewalk, curb,
or gutter is not complete, unless said building permit is accompanied by the issuance of a permit
under the terms of this chapter for the completion of such improvements on the street frontage;
except that if the City Engineer determines that it is in the public interest, he may waive all or a
portion of the improvements required by the provisions of this section.
7.04.420 Repair of sidewalks.
A. Definitions.
1. “Maintenance and repair of sidewalk area” includes, but is not limited to,
maintenance and repair of surfaces including grinding; removal and replacement of
sidewalks; repair and maintenance of sidewalks; repair and maintenance of curbs and
gutters; removal of impervious paving materials from street tree planting strips, or other
right-of-way landscape planters; removal of weeds and/or debris; tree root pruning and
installing root barriers; trimming of shrubs and/or groundcover and trimming shrubs
within the area between the property line of the adjacent property and the street
pavement line, including planting strips and curbs.
2. “Sidewalk” shall have the same meaning as in Section 5600 of the California Streets
and Highways Code, as it may hereafter be amended.
B. Maintenance and Repair of Sidewalks.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 552
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
1. Obligation to Repair and Maintain. The owners of lots or portions of lots adjacent to
or fronting on any portion of a sidewalk area between the property line of the lots and the
street line, including landscape planting strips, sidewalks, retaining walls, curbs and
gutters, and persons in possession of such lots by virtue of any permit or right, shall
repair and maintain such sidewalk areas in a condition that is not dangerous to property
or to persons using the sidewalk in a reasonable manner and will not interfere with the
public convenience of said sidewalk area. The owners shall also pay the costs and
expenses therefor. All work performed within the public right-of-way requires an
encroachment permit pursuant to Section 7.04.390 of the Dublin Municipal Code.
When, during the course of a development project’s lifetime, it is necessary to remove or
reconstruct public street improvements (i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk), such improvements shall be
reconstructed to preserve or reestablish any previously existing landscape planter, when certain
landscape improvements have been included in the planned development (PD) properties
subject to PD restrictions shall preserve existing street trees and other landscaping to the extent
possible, or shall install new landscaping subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer.
Subsequent to adoption of the ordinance codified in this article, any unauthorized work
conducted within the public right-of-way landscape areas shall be brought into conformance with
the intent and provisions of this article, and other applicable provisions of the Dublin Municipal
Code pertaining to encroachments on city property. Such unauthorized work shall constitute a
violation of this article and is punishable as an infraction.
C. Recovery of City’s Costs of Sidewalk Maintenance and Repair. Anything in this article to
the contrary notwithstanding, with respect to maintenance and repair of sidewalk areas and the
making, confirming and collecting of assessment for the costs and expenses of said
maintenance and repair, the city may proceed under the provisions of Chapter 22 of Division 7,
Part 3 of the Streets and Highways Code of the state as the same is now in effect or may
hereinafter be amended to recover costs it incurs in maintaining and repairing sidewalks. The
required maintenance and repairs of sidewalk area must commence within thirty (30) days of
notification. Costs recoverable by the city may include a charge for the city’s costs of inspection
and administration whenever the city awards a contract for such maintenance and repair and
including the costs of collection of assessment for the costs of maintenance and repair or the
handling of any lien placed on the property due to the failure of the property owner to promptly
pay such assessments.
While maintenance and repair costs ultimately remain the property owner’s responsibility, a
portion of the city’s annual budget is allocated for sidewalk repair and the city may choose to
permanently repair certain sidewalks with such money.
D. Liability for Injuries to Public. The property owners of lots or portions of lots fronting on or
adjacent to any portion of a street or any portion of a sidewalk area between the property line of
the lots and the street line, and any persons in possession of such lots by virtue of any permit or
right shall owe a duty to members of the public to keep and maintain the sidewalk area in a safe
and nondangerous condition. The failure of any property owner or possessor of property to
maintain the sidewalk areas in a nondangerous condition is negligence. If any person suffers
injury or damage to person or property as a result of the property owner’s or possessor’s failure
to maintain or repair the sidewalk areas as required by this article, the property owner or
possessor of property shall be liable to such person for the resulting damages or injury.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 553
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
E. Notice of Repair. Whenever a portion of the sidewalk needs repair or endangers the
public’s use of such sidewalk, the person whose job it is to maintain streets shall notify the
owner and person in possession that such sidewalk needs repair in the manner provided in
Health and Safety Code Sections 5611 through 5614. If the owner does not fix the sidewalk
within thirty (30) days, the city will fix the property and all costs may become a lien upon the
property, pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code 7.04.470.
Article IV. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities
7.04.430 Permit—Required.
A. No person shall construct, install, modify, or maintain a Personal Wireless Service Facility
within, upon, over, or under the limits of any street in the city without first obtaining a Personal
Wireless Service Facility Permit as required in Article II of this chapter, and Chapter 8.92 of the
Zoning Ordinance as it relates to Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief Act of 2012.
B. In addition to the requirements of Section 7.04.190, a Personal Wireless Service Facility
Permit shall not be issued if the applicant seeks to:
1. Install a new utility, transit, or street light pole on a street where there presently are no
overhead utility facilities, other than street lights, unless it can be demonstrated to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer that utilization of an existing street light pole is not
technically feasible for the applicant’s coverage objective;
2. Install a Personal Wireless Service Facility that fails to comply with applicable
building, structural, electrical, or safety codes or other laws, including, but not limited to,
the Americans with Disabilities Act; or
3. Add a Personal Wireless Service Facility on a city owned street light pole or other
traffic control and safety pole for which the city has not given its permission.
7.04.440 Development Standards.
Due to the potential visual impacts associated with right-of-way installations, the following is
required for all Personal Wireless Service Facility installations within the street:
A. Installations must use all design techniques to minimize visual impacts, as determined by the
City Engineer.
B. New or replacement poles supporting a Personal Wireless Service Facility shall match style,
color and material of the original or adjacent poles.
C. The maximum height of a pole supporting a Personal Wireless Service Facility shall be equal
to the average height of all existing utility or street light poles within 100 feet; provided, however,
that an antenna located within a shroud on top of the pole may extend the height of the pole by
a maximum of 5 feet, or up to 12 feet on a joint pole as may be necessary to comply with the
clearance requirements established by California Public Utilities Commission General Order 95
or other applicable law or regulation. The height of any street light or utility pole shall not be
modified unless approved by the City Engineer.
D. No exposed cables. All cables shall be concealed within a sleeve between the bottom of the
antenna and the mounting bracket. For wooden poles, cables shall be concealed with the use
of shrouds, risers or conduit.
E. Minimum height clearance regulations shall be observed by all components of the
installation.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 554
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
F. No signs, other than those required by government or electrical utility notifications shall be
located on the poles. All signage shall be designed with the lowest visibility, utilize a muted color
and located as close to the antenna as possible. This does not pertain to identification badges,
as may be required by the City Engineer. No facility may include any advertising material.
G. The facility, including the antennas, cabling and related equipment shall be constructed out
of non-reflective materials, painted and/or textured to match the existing support structure, and
shall not produce any noticeable artificial light.
H. The facility must be located so that it does not block the required illumination provided by the
street light.
I. Above-ground cabinets are discouraged. The City Engineer shall not approve an above-
ground cabinet to serve a Personal Wireless Service Facility unless the applicant demonstrates
that placement underground or pole mounting of equipment is not technically feasible or that the
undergrounding or pole mounting will have more significant impacts on the public than the
above-ground cabinet. Where technically feasible, equipment shall be placed underground,
unless it would have more significant impacts on the public than pole mounted equipment.
Aboveground cabinets shall be designed and located in an area with minimal visual impact, as
determined by the City Engineer. Pole mounted equipment is subject to the following:
1. Equipment shall be mounted in a manner to reduce its visibility and not obstruct the
visibility of any road signs.
2. Equipment cabinets may not exceed 7 cubic feet in volume.
3. All equipment shall be limited to a maximum noise level of 45 dB measured at the
nearest property line.
K. All disturbed landscape shall be replaced in-kind and areas of bare or disturbed soil shall be
vegetated or landscaped to prevent erosion to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
L. All new installations shall utilize brackets that allow antennas and associated facilities to be
mounted at a standoff of no more than 4 inches measured horizontally from the pole, unless it
can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that a greater distance is required
for clearance purposes.
7.04.450 Public Notification.
A. Notice Required. Prior to commencement of installation of a Personal Wireless Service
Facility, the permittee shall notify the public of the proposed installation as specified in this
section. The notice shall be mailed and posted at least 10 days prior to installation as specified
below. The permittee shall provide evidence of compliance with this requirement.
B. Types of Notice Required.
1. Notice by Mail. The permittee shall send, via first class U.S. mail, a copy of the notice
to the owner(s) and occupant of each parcel that: (1) fronts the street on which the
proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility is located or fronts a street that intersects
such street and (2) is within 150 linear feet of the proposed Personal Wireless Service
Facility. For example, if the distance from a proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility
to a nearby street corner is 50 feet, the permittee is required to notify owners of parcels
on that intersecting street whose properties are located within 100 feet or less.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 555
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
2. Notice by Posting. The permittee shall post a copy of the notice at the location of the
pole where the Personal Wireless Service Facility is to be installed and in three other
conspicuous locations that are within 100 feet in each direction from the pole.
3. Contents and Form of Notice. The notice shall contain such information, and be in
such form, as the City Engineer reasonably requires in order to inform the general public
as to the nature of the installation of a Personal Wireless Service Facility. At a minimum,
the notice shall:
a. Provide a description and a photo-simulation of the proposed Personal
Wireless Service Facility; and
b. Explain how any interested person may obtain additional information and
documents related to the permit.
Article VI. Enforcement
7.04.460 Permit—Revocation.
Any permit issued hereunder may be revoked by the City Engineer for violation of the provisions
of this chapter or if the permitted activity poses an imminent threat to the public health, safety, or
welfare.
7.04.470 Appeals.
An applicant or permittee may appeal the decision of the City Engineer concerning the denial or
revocation of a permit to the City Manager pursuant to the provisions of Section 1.04.050. The
City Manager may deny the appeal or grant the appeal with terms and conditions necessary to
protect the public health and safety.
7.04.480 Enforcement officer designated.
The City Engineer is designated as the enforcement authority for purposes of enforcing the
provisions of this chapter.
7.04.490 Nuisance summary abatement.
Violation of the provisions of this chapter are declared to constitute a nuisance. The City
Engineer may summarily abate any such nuisance in accordance with California Government
Code Section 38773. The costs of such abatement shall be a personal obligation of the property
owner and may be made a lien against the property in accordance with the provisions of Section
7.04.470.
7.04.500 Lien procedure.
A. Record of Cost. The City Engineer shall keep an account of the cost of performing the
abatement, including reasonable administrative costs, on each separate lot or parcel of land,
and the name of the owner thereof. Such costs shall become, when confirmed, a special
assessment against the property.
B. Council Appeal. Between the first and fifteenth day of July of each year, the City Manager
shall cause to be published a notice to the effect that any owner upon whose property the City
Engineer has performed any work hereunder during the preceding fiscal year may appeal
therefrom to the Council. Such notice shall be published once in accordance with Government
Code Section 6061. Any appeal shall state the grounds for appealing. At the next regular
meeting of the City Council after the first day of August, it shall hold a hearing to confirm the
costs and any appeals, and its determination thereupon shall be final.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 556
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
C. Lien. After confirmation of the costs by the City Council a certified copy of the confirmed
report shall be filed with the County Auditor who shall enter each assessment on the tax roll
against the respective premises. Such assessment shall be collected at the same time in the
manner as ordinary municipal ad valorem taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties and
the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for such taxes. All laws
applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of municipal ad valorem property taxes shall
be applicable to such assessments. The lien created attaches upon recordation of a certified
copy of the confirmed report in the office of the County Recorder and shall continue until the
charges and fees are fully paid.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph,
sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance,
is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any other
person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Dublin hereby declares that it would
have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its
adoption.
Section 4. Posting. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to
be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section
36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of _____, 2017, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 557
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
7
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
ORDINANCE NO. XX-17
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
*********
AMENDING CHAPTER 8.92, 8.36, AND 8.104 OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
The City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 8.92 (Wireless Communications Facilities) of the Dublin
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“8.92.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide a uniform and comprehensive set of standards for the
development and installation of wireless communication facilities and related facilities. These
standards cover the siting, designing and permitting of wireless communication facilities.
8.92.020 Intent.
The intent of the regulations contained herein is to protect and promote public health, safety,
community welfare and to:
A. Protect the visual character of the City from the potential adverse effects of wireless
communication facilities development and wireless communication facility installation;
B. Ensure against the creation of visual blight within or along the City’s scenic corridors and
ridgelines;
C. Ensure that wireless communication facilities, to the maximum extent possible, are located
in areas where the adverse impacts on the community are minimal;
D. Ensure that wireless communication facilities, which include equipment cabinets and
shelters, are configured in a way that minimizes the adverse visual impact of the facilities;
E. Retain local responsibility for management of the use of the public right-of-way;
F. Enhance the ability of the provider of wireless communication services to provide such
services to the community quickly, effectively and efficiently;
G. Ensure that a competitive and broad range of wireless communication services and high
quality wireless communication service infrastructure are provided to serve the business
community;
H. Encourage collocation when it will decrease visual impacts and discourage collocation
when it will increase negative visual impacts, to the extent allowed by state and federal law; and
I. Establish a process for obtaining necessary permits for wireless communication facilities
while at the same time ensuring compliance with applicable zoning, building, and safety
requirements under this code.
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 558
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
8.92.030 Definitions.
For the purposes of this Chapter, unless otherwise apparent from the context, the definitions
below shall apply. Where any of the definitions in this Chapter may conflict with definitions in
Chapter 8.08 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance, the definitions in this Chapter shall prevail for
purposes of this Chapter.
A. Antenna. The term antenna shall mean any system of wires, poles, panels, rods, reflecting
disc, or similar devices used for the transmission or reception of electromagnetic waves (or
radio frequency signals) when such system is either external to or attached to the exterior of a
structure, ground-mounted, or is portable or movable. “Antenna” includes devices having active
elements extending in any direction, and directional beam-type arrays having elements carried
by and disposed from a generally horizontal boom that may be mounted upon and rotated
through a vertical mast or tower interconnecting the boom and antenna support, all of which
elements are deemed to be a part of the antenna.
B. Base Station. The term base station includes any structure other than a tower that supports
or houses equipment in a fixed location that enables Federal Communications Commission
(FCC)-licensed or authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a
communications network. As an illustration and not a limitation, the FCC's definition refer s to
any structure that actually supports wireless equipment even though it was not originally
intended for that purpose. Examples include, but are not limited to, wireless facilities mounted
on buildings, utility poles and transmission towers, light standards or traffic signals. A structure
without wireless equipment replaced with a new structure designed to bear the additional weight
of wireless equipment constitutes a “Base Station”.
C. Collocation. The term collocation shall mean the mounting of a wireless communication
facility on or integrated within the same tower or structure as an existing, authorized wireless
communication facility.
D. Fully- Concealed Facility. The term fully-concealed facility refers to wireless communication
facilities which are designed and constructed to blend in with the surrounding environment so
that the antenna and related equipment are not readily visible. Examples include a cupola on a
building, water tank, artificial tree, rocks and a utility pole where all antenna and related
equipment are internally mounted or underground.
E. Height. The term height shall mean the distance measured from ground level to the highest
point on the wireless communication facility, including an antenna or piece of equipment
attached thereto. In the case of “crank-up” or other similar towers whose height can be adjusted,
the height of the tower shall be the maximum height to which it is capable of being raised.
F. Owner or Operator. The term owner or operator shall mean the person, entity or agency
primarily responsible for installation and maintenance of the wireless communication facility,
which may or may not be the same person or entity which is the owner of the property on which
the facility is located.
G. Public Right-of-Way. The term public right-of-way shall mean and include all public
streets and easements, now and hereafter owned by the City or other public entity, but only to
the extent of the City or public entity’s right, title, interest or authority to grant a license to occupy
and use such streets and easements for wireless communication facilities.
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 559
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
H. Radio Frequency (RF). The term radio frequency (RF) shall mean electromagnetic energy
with wave lengths between the audio range and the light range.
I. Readily Visible. The term readily visible means that an object can be seen from street level
by a person with normal vision, and distinguished as an antenna or related equipment of a
wireless communication facility, due to the fact that it is not fully-concealed, stands out as a
prominent feature of the landscape, protrudes above or out from the structure ridgeline, or is
otherwise not sufficiently camouflaged or designed to be compatible with the appurtenant
architecture or building materials.
J. Related Equipment. The term related equipment shall mean all equipment ancillary to the
transmission and reception of voice and data via radio frequencies. Such equipment may
include, but is not limited to, cable conduit and connectors, equipment pads, equipment
shelters, cabinets, buildings and access ladders.
K. Structure Ridgeline. The term structure ridgeline shall mean the line along the top of an
existing roof or top of a structure, including existing parapets, penthouses, or mechanical
equipment screens.
L. Tower. The term tower shall mean a mast, pole, monopole, lattice tower, or other structure
erected on the ground or on a structure designed and primarily used to support antennas. A
ground or building mounted mast greater than 15 feet tall and 6 inches in diameter supporting
one or more antenna, dishes, arrays, etc., shall be considered a wireless communications
tower.
M. Wireless Communication Facilities. The term wireless communication facilities shall
mean a facility that transmits and/or receives electromagnetic signals, including antennas,
microwave dishes, parabolic antennas, directional antennas and other types of equipment for
the transmission or reception of such signals, towers or similar structures supporting the
equipment, equipment buildings, shelters, cabinets, parking area and other accessory
development.
N. Section 6409(a). The term Section 6409(a) refers to Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class
Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, codified as 47 U.S.C. section 1455(a), as may be
amended or interpreted in judicial or administrative decisions or implementing regulations.
O. Section 6409(a) Modification. The term Section 6409(a) Modification means a collocation,
modification, or replacement of transmission equipment at an existing wireless tower or base
station that does not result in a substantial change in the physical dimensions of the existing
wireless tower or base station pursuant to Section 6409(a).
P. Substantial Change. The term substantial change for the purposes of a Section 6409(a)
Modification shall mean:
1. For wireless towers outside the public right-of-way, a substantial change occurs when
the proposed collocation or modification:
a. Increases the overall height more than ten (10) percent or the height of one
additional antenna array not to exceed twenty (20) feet (whichever is greater); or
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 560
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
b. Increases the width more than twenty feet (20) from the edge of the tower or
the width of the tower at the level of the appurtenance (whichever is greater); or
c. Involves the installation of more than the standard number of equipment
cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four (4); or
d. Involves excavation outside of the current boundaries of the leased or owned
property surrounding the tower, including any access or utility easements
currently related to the site.
2. For wireless towers within the public right-of-way and for all base stations, a
substantial change occurs when the proposed collocation or modification:
a. Increases the overall height more than ten (10) percent or ten (10) feet
(whichever is greater); or
b. Increases the width more than six (6) feet from the edge of the tower or base
station; or
c. Involves the installation of any new ground-mounted equipment cabinets that
are ten percent (10%) larger in height or volume than any existing ground
mounted equipment cabinets; or
d. Involves the installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground when
there are no existing ground-mounted equipment cabinets; or
e. Involves excavation outside the area in proximity to the structure and other
transmission equipment already deployed on the ground.
3. For all proposed collocations and modifications, a substantial change occurs when:
a. The proposed collocation or modification would defeat the concealment
elements of the tower or base station; or
b. The proposed collocation or modification violates a prior condition of approval,
provided however that the collocation need not comply with any prior condition of
approval that is determined to be inconsistent with the thresholds for a
substantial change described in this section.
The thresholds and conditions for a "substantial change" described in this section
are mutually exclusive—the violation of any individual threshold or condition
results in a substantial change. The height and width thresholds for a substantial
change described in this section are cumulative for each individual wireless tower
or base station. The cumulative limit is measured from the physical dimensions of
the original structure for base stations and all sites in the public rights-of-way,
and from the smallest physical dimensions that existed on or after February 22,
2012, for wireless towers on private property.
8.92.040 Exemptions.
The following wireless communication facilities are exempt from the standards of this Chapter,
but shall fully comply with other applicable requirements of the municipal code including, but not
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 561
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
limited to, adopted building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and fire codes:
A. Antennas designed to receive video programming signals from direct broadcast satellite
(DBS) services, multi-channel multipoint distribution providers (MMDS), or television broadcast
stations (TVBS), provided that all of the following conditions are met:
1. The antenna measures 39 inches (one meter) or less in diameter within residential
districts; or 78 inches (two meters) or less in diameter within commercial and industrial
zoning districts;
2. If the antenna is mounted on a mast, the mast must measure less than twelve (12)
feet in height;
3. The antenna does not pose a threat to public safety, including, but not limited to,
minimum separation from power lines, compliance with electrical and fire code
requirements, and secure installation, as determined by the Building Official;
4. The antenna is not located on a site or building with historical significance, as
demonstrated by inclusion on any list of historical sites officially adopted by any local,
state, or federal governmental body;
5. To the extent feasible, the antenna is installed in a location where it is not readily
visible from the public right-of-way.
B. Amateur radio antennas that do not exceed the maximum building height for the zoning
district in which it is located by more than 25 feet. If an antenna is installed on the roof of the
building, the height of the antenna shall be inclusive of the building height.
C. Public communication facilities, including personal wireless services, used and maintained
by the City, or any fire district, school district, hospital, ambulance service, governmental
agency, or similar public use.
D. Minor repair and regular maintenance of an existing wireless telecommunication facility that
does not increase the number, height, size, or appearance of the antennas or ancillary related
equipment as previously approved by the City.
E. All wireless communication facilities in the public right-of-way. Wireless communication
facilities in the public right-of-way shall be subject to a Personal Wireless Facilities Services
Permit as set forth in Chapter 7.04 of the Dublin Municipal Code, which sets forth the particular
terms and provisions under which the approval to occupy and use the public rights-of-way of the
City will be granted if occupancy of the public rights-of-way is desired or required.
F. Any “co-location facility” that meets the requirements of California Government Code Section
65850.6.
8.92.050 Permitting Procedure.
A Site Development Review pursuant to Chapter 8.104 shall be required for all new or modified
wireless communication facilities, unless otherwise noted in this Chapter.
8.92.060 Application Requirements.
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 562
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
A. New Wireless Communication Facilities. The following application materials are
required for new wireless communication facilities:
1. Plans. Complete and accurate plans, fully-dimensioned and drawn to scale, which
include the following items.
a. A depiction of all existing and proposed utility runs and points of contact.
b. A depiction of the leased or licensed area of the site with all rights-of-way and
easements for access and utilities labeled in plan view.
c. Plan view and all elevations of a scaled depiction of the maximum permitted
increase to towers, base stations and other support structures as authorized
by Section 6409(a) of the 2012 Middle Class Tax Relief Act. The proposed
project shall be used as the baseline for new facilities and the existing facility
used as the baseline for modifications.
2. Authorization. A statement from property owner authorizing application.
3. Description of Services. A description of the services that the applicant proposes to
offer or provide in conjunction with the proposed sites.
4. Definition of Service Area. Definition of the service area needed for coverage or
capacity of a wireless communication facility and service area maps and information
showing that the proposed facility would provide the needed coverage or capacity.
5. Alternative Site Analysis. Alternative site analysis and map showing all alternate
sites, including all collocation opportunities within one-half mile, that were analyzed in the
wireless communication service provider’s site selection process and any additional sites
as required by the Community Development Director from which the needed coverage
could also be provided, indicating the zoning for all such sites. The analysis shall address
the potential for collocation at an existing or new site.
An alternative site analysis is not required for facilities which are fully-concealed from
public view.
6. Visual Analysis. Photo simulations of the proposed project including a map depicting
where the photos were taken. The visual impact analysis may require photo overlays,
scaled models, renderings, or mockups as determined appropriate by the Community
Development Director.
7. Noise Analysis. Noise impact analysis information for the proposed wireless
communication facility including, but not limited to, equipment, such as air conditioning
units and back-up generators. A manufacturer’s specification sheet may be provided in
lieu of a noise impact analysis, if determined appropriate by the Community Development
Director.
8. RF Emissions. Written documentation demonstrating that emissions from the
proposed wireless communications facility are within the limits set by the FCC. The
document shall include both the actual levels as they exist currently and the cumulative
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 563
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
levels for the proposed facility and all other facilities in the vicinity.
9. Landscape Plan. Where applicable, the applicant shall submit a plan depicting
existing surrounding landscaping, proposed landscaping, a landscape protection plan for
construction and a maintenance plan (including an irrigation plan).
10. Other Information. The applicant shall submit any other relevant information as
required by the Community Development Director.
B. Modifications to Existing Wireless Communication Facilities. The following application
materials are required for modifications to all existing wireless communication facilities except
Section 6409(a) Modifications:
1. Plans. Complete and accurate plans, full-dimensioned and drawn to scale, which
include the following items.
a. A depiction of all existing and proposed utility runs and points of contact.
b. A depiction of the leased or licensed area of the site with all rights-of-way and
easements for access and utilities labeled in plain view.
2. Prior Permits. True and correct copies of all previously obtained land use approvals,
including all required conditions of approval.
3. Noise Analysis. Noise impact analysis for the proposed wireless communication
facility including, but not limited to, equipment, such as air conditioning units and back-
up generators. A manufacturer’s specification sheet may be provided in lieu of a noise
impact analysis, if determined appropriate by the Community Development Director.
4. RF Emissions. Written documentation demonstrating that emissions from the
proposed wireless communications facility are within the limits set by the FCC. The
document shall include both the actual levels as they exist currently and the cumulative
levels for the proposed facility and all other facilities in the vicinity.
5. Other Information. The applicant shall submit any other relevant information as
required by the Community Development Director.
8.92.070 Section 6409(a) Modification.
Except as expressly modified by this section, an application for a Section 6409(a) Modification
shall be subject to the provisions of this Chapter.
A. Application Materials. Notwithstanding Section 8.92.060 (Application Requirements), the
following application materials are required for Section 6409(a) Modifications:
1. A site plan and elevation drawings for the facility as existing and as proposed with all
height and width measurements explicitly stated. The plans must include plan views and
all four elevations that depict the physical dimensions of the existing facility as it existed
on February 22, 2012 or as approved if constructed after February 22, 2012.
2. A description of all construction that will be performed in connection with the
proposed modification, including, but not limited to, the location of any excavations or
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 564
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
deployments.
3. A written statement that explains in plain factual detail whether and how Section
6409(a) and applicable implementing regulations require approval of the proposed
Section 6409(a) Modification. A complete written narrative analysis shall state the
applicable standard and all facts that would allow the city to conclude the standard has
been met. Bare conclusions without factual support shall not constitute a complete
written analysis. As part of the written statement the applicant shall include: (i) whether
and how the support structure qualifies as an existing tower or existing base station; and
(ii) whether and how the proposed Section 6409(a) Modification does not cause a
substantial change in height, width, excavation, equipment cabinets, concealment, or
permit compliance.
4. True, correct and complete copies of all permits and other regulatory approvals,
including without limitation any conditions of approval, issued in connection with the
tower or base station to be collocated on or modified.
B. Review and Required Findings. Notwithstanding the provisions of 8.92.050
(Permitting Procedures) and 8.92.080 (Development Standards and Regulations), the
Community Development Director shall approve or deny a request for a Section 6409(a)
Modification in accordance with this section and applicable federal law or regulations. The
Community Development Director shall approve an application for a Section 6409(a)
Modification if he or she makes the following findings:
1. The proposed modification does not cause a substantial change in the existing tower
or base station and otherwise fully qualifies as a Section 6409(a) Modification under
applicable law;
2. The existing tower or base station was permitted with all required regulatory
approvals required at the time of construction; and
3. The proposed modification does not violate any legally enforceable standard or permit
condition reasonably related to public health and safety, including, but not limited to,
building, structural, electrical, and safety codes.
A proposed modification to a wireless communication facility that does not qualify as a Section
6409(a) Modification shall be denied and will instead be subject to the requirements set forth in
this Chapter for the specific type of wireless communication facility proposed.
C. Other. Nothing in this section prevents the city from imposing other lawful conditions on
the approval of a Section 6409(a) Modification including, but not limited to, conditions consistent
with obligations imposed on the initial installation. Nothing in this section shall be construed to
waive or limit the city’s proprietary right to control the use of its real or personal property for
telecommunications purposes.
8.92.080 Development Standards and Regulations.
A. Residential Districts. Wireless communication facilities are prohibited on private property in
all residential zoning districts and comparable Planned Development zoning districts except as
indicated in Section 8.92.040.
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 565
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
B. Location Criteria. All wireless communication facilities shall be located so as to minimize
their visibility. The following measures shall be implemented:
1. No wireless communication facilities shall be installed on an exposed ridgeline, or at
a location readily visible from I-580, I-680, or scenic corridor identified in the Eastern
Dublin Scenic Corridor Policy, or on property designated Parks/Recreation, Open Space,
or Stream Corridor on the Dublin General Plan, unless it blends with the surrounding
existing natural and artificial environment in such a manner as to not be readily visible,
and a finding is made that no other location is technically feasible and complies with
those policy documents;
2. No facility may be located within the front setback, along major street frontages where
it will be readily visible or between the face of a building and a public street, bikeway or
park, except for approved facade-mounted equipment or facilities located on existing
structures;
3. No towers shall be installed closer than one half mile from any existing tower unless
technologically required (technical evidence must be submitted to the Community
Development Director showing a clear need for this facility, and the infeasibility of
collocating it on an existing site), or visually preferable (i.e. fully-concealed facility that
blends with the surrounding existing natural and artificial environment;
4. Each facility shall be operated in such a manner so as to minimize any possible
disruption caused by noise. Backup generators shall only be operated during periods of
power outages, and shall not be tested on weekends or holidays, or between the hours
of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekday nights. At no time shall equipment noise from
any source exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB at the property line. If the facility is
located within one hundred (100) feet of a residential use, noise attenuation measures
shall be included to reduce noise levels to a level of 50 dBA measured at the property
line.
5. All towers shall be set back at least twenty percent (20%) of the tower height from all
property lines, and at least one hundred (100) feet from any public trail, park, or outdoor
recreation area, unless it is a fully-concealed facility that blends with the surrounding
existing natural and artificial environment.
C. Design Review Criteria. In addition to all other requirements set forth in this Chapter, all
wireless communication facilities shall meet the following design requirements:
1. Minimizing Visual Impact. All wireless communication facilities shall incorporate
appropriate techniques to camouflage, disguise and/or blend them into the surrounding
environment. Wireless communication facilities shall be in scale and designed to blend
with the existing natural or built surroundings and existing supporting structures. The City
shall have the authority to require special design features for the wireless communication
facilities in areas of particular sensitivity (e.g. proximity to historic or aesthetically
significant structures, views and/or community features).
Based on potential aesthetic impact, the order of preference for facility type is: (1)
Collocation sites, when such siting minimizes adverse effects related to land use
compatibility, visual resources, public safety, and other environmental factors, (2)
building-mounted (façade or roof) facilities, (3) ground-mounted facilities and (4) a new
tower.
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 566
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
2. Paint and Finish Materials. Wireless communication facilities including the
antennas and related equipment shall be constructed out of non-reflective materials,
painted and/or textured to match the existing support structure and painted to blend with
their surroundings.
3. Related Equipment. All equipment shelters or cabinets must be concealed from
public view or made compatible with the architecture of surrounding structures or placed
underground. Support equipment pads, cabinets, shelters and buildings require
architectural, landscape, color, or other camouflage treatment to minimize visual impacts.
4. Lightning Arrestors and Beacon Lights. Lightning arrestors and beacon lights
shall not be included in the design of facilities unless required by the FAA. Lightning
arrestors and beacons shall be included when calculating the height of facilities such as
towers.
5. Height. The maximum height of a wireless communication facility shall be equal to
the height limit for the district in which it is located. An exception to the height limit may be
approved based on a visual analysis demonstrating that views of the facility are
minimized or are substantially screened, and on an engineering analysis justifying the
height of the proposed facility and demonstrating that a lower height is not feasible.
6. Lighting. Wireless communication facilities shall not be artificially lighted, unless
required by the FAA or other applicable authority and designed to ensure the least
disturbance to the surrounding views.
7. Satellite Dish/Parabolic Antennas - Ground-Mounted. Satellite dish or parabolic
antennas that are ground-mounted shall be situated as close to the ground as possible to
reduce visual impact without compromising their function. No such antenna shall be
located in any front yard, nor in a corner side yard unless the antenna is screened from
pedestrian-level view. No such antenna exceeding 39 inches in diameter shall be located
within a required setback unless approved through a Site Development Review
application upon a showing that no reasonable alternative location is available.
8. Roof Setbacks. Roof-mounted antennas shall be constructed at the minimum height
possible to serve the operator’s service area. Roof mounted antennas shall be designed
to minimize their visibility and blend with the surroundings. Placing roof mounted
antennas in direct line with significant view corridors shall be avoided.
8.92.090 Removal of Abandoned Facilities.
Any wireless communication facilities that are not operated for a continuous period of twelve
(12) months shall be considered abandoned, and the owner of such facilities or the owner of the
property upon which the facilities are located shall remove the same within ninety (90) days of
receipt of notice from the Community Development Director notifying the owners of the removal
requirement. If such facilities are not removed within the ninety (90) days, the Community
Development Director may cause the antenna or tower to be removed at the expense of the
owners of the facilities and the property. If there are two (2) or more users of a single tower, the
tower shall not be deemed abandoned and shall not be subject to these provisions until all users
have abandoned the facility.”
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 567
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Section 2. Subsection 8.36.110.C.3.c (Utility and Communication Facilities) of the
Dublin Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“c. Utility and communications facilities. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 8.92,
Wireless Communication Facilities Regulations, individual radio and television receiving
antennas, wireless communication facilities, satellite dishes, transmission and distribution
poles and towers for public utilities. See Chapter 8.92 Wireless Communication Facilities
regarding development regulations and land use approvals for those facilities.”
Section 3. Subsection 8.104.020.I (Site Development Review) of the Dublin
Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows:
“I. Minor modifications to Wireless Communications Facilities. Minor modifications
to existing wireless communication facilities that involve no physical change visible from
the public right-of-way.”
Section 4. Subsections 8.104.030.A.4 and 8.104.030.A.5 (Site Development
Review) of the Dublin Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows:
“4. Modifications to Wireless Communications Facilities. Modifications to existing
wireless communication facilities that involve changes to the appearance where the
change is in substantial conformance with the approved Site Development Review and
Section 6409(a) Modifications as defined in Chapter 8.92. These facilities are also
subject to the provisions of Chapter 8.92, Wireless Communication Facilities.”
5. Other Improvements. All other improvements determined by the Community
Development Director to be minor in nature and requiring review.”
Section 5. Section 8.104.040.A.12 (Site Development Review) of the Dublin
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
“12. Wireless Communications Facilities. All new wireless communication facilities
and modifications to wireless communication facilities that are not in conformance with
an approved Site Development Review. These facilities are also subject to the
provisions of Chapter 8.92, Wireless Communication Facilities.”
Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph,
sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance,
is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any other
person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Dublin hereby declares that it would
have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions,
paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its
adoption.
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 568
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Section 8. Posting. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to
be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section
36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of _____, 2017, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk
6.2.b
Packet Pg. 569
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
D
r
a
f
t
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
8
.
9
2
,
8
.
3
6
,
a
n
d
8
.
1
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
D
u
b
l
i
n
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
6.2.c
Packet Pg. 570
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
0
9
.
2
6
.
1
7
(
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
U
p
d
a
t
e
)
6.2.c
Packet Pg. 571
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
0
9
.
2
6
.
1
7
(
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
U
p
d
a
t
e
)
6.2.d
Packet Pg. 572
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
7
-
1
0
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
6.2.d
Packet Pg. 573
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
4
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
1
7
-
1
0
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
Page 1 of 5
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Fallon 55 General Plan Amendment Study Initiation Request (PLPA-2017-
00062)
Prepared by: Mandy Kang, Senior Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will a consider a request by William Lyon Homes to initiate a General
Plan Amendment Study for approximately 22 acres primarily located east of the Terrace
Ridge development and west of Fallon Road. The Study would evaluate a proposal to
change the existing General Plan land use designation of the 22 acres from Rural
Residential/Agriculture to 12 acres designated Single Family Residential and 10 acres
designated Open Space in order to accommodate a proposed age-restricted community
that would consist of 57 single family homes.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Approving the Initiation of a General Plan Amendment Study to
Evaluate Changing the Land Use Designation of Approximately 22 Acres from Rural
Residential/Agriculture to 12 acres Designated Single Family Residential and 10 acres
Designated Open Space; OR, adopt the Resolution Denying the Initiation of a General
Plan Amendment Study to Evaluate Changing the Land Use Designation of
Approximately 22 acres from Rural Residential/Agriculture to 10 Acres Designated
Single Family Residential and 10 acres Designated Open Space.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There will be no financial impact to the City. All costs associated with preparing the
General Plan Amendment Study, if authorized by the City Council, would be borne by
the Project Proponent.
DESCRIPTION:
Background
The Fallon 55 project is proposed on an undeveloped site currently owned by the
Wildlife Management LLC. The 22-acre project site is located in the northwest corner of
8.1
Packet Pg. 574
Page 2 of 5
a larger 50.73-acre area located west of Fallon Road and east of Tassajara Road, as
shown in Figure 1 below. This 22-acre area has a General Plan Land Use Designation
of Rural Residential/Agriculture and is located in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
(EDSP) area.
The site consists of vacant land and is generally sloping in two directions toward a
stream at the southern portion of the larger area. The site is vegetated with low lying
native and non-native grasses. The northwestern 12 acres of the project site have been
previously graded.
The site is generally surrounded by residential uses and Open Space as shown in
Figure 1 and Table 1 below.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Table 1. Adjacent Uses
Existing Use Land Use Designations
North Silvera Ranch – detached and attached homes Medium Density &
Medium/High Density Residential
South Dublin Ranch Golf Course &
single family detached homes
Open Space &
Single Family Residential
East Fallon Road --
West Terrace Ridge – single family detached homes
& Quarry Lane School
Single Family Residential &
Medium Density Residential
DUBLIN RANCH
Fallon Road
Tassajara Road
SILVERA RANCH
TERRACE RIDGE
QUARRY LANE SCHOOL
8.1
Packet Pg. 575
Page 3 of 5
Figure 2. Fallon 55 Existing Land Uses
It is the City Council’s policy to initiate all General Plan Amendment studies prior to
accepting an application and beginning work on such a request. The City received a
letter from William Lyon Homes requesting that the City Council consider initiating a
General Plan Amendment Study (Attachment 1) to change the Land Use Designation of
22 acres from Rural Residential/Agriculture to 12 acres designated as Single Family
Residential and 10 acres designated as Open Space.
ANALYSIS:
The Applicant proposes to develop an age-restricted community consisting of 57
homes. The existing Rural Residential/Agriculture Land Use Designation allows for one
unit per 100 gross residential acres which would allow for one home on this site. To
accommodate the proposed project, the applicant has proposed a General Plan
Amendment to designate 12 acres of the site to Single Family Residential and 10 acres
to Open Space (Figure 3). The balance of the 50.73 acre area will remain designated as
Open Space and continue to be held in a permanent conservation easement as
mitigation for the Dublin Ranch development.
8.1
Packet Pg. 576
Page 4 of 5
Figure 3. Fallon 55 Proposed Land Uses
At this time, the Applicant is requesting initiation of a General Plan and Specific Plan
Amendment Study. Development of the site would require additional entitlements
including: a) Planned Development Rezone with a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development
Plan, b) Tentative Map, and c) Site Development Review Permit.
If the City Council initiates a General Plan Amendment Study, Staff would then:
1. Determine the associated impacts from the land use change;
2. Complete a fiscal impact analysis of the proposed land use changes;
3. Conduct the appropriate level of environmental review and documentation;
4. Perform any additional studies that may be required; and
5. Prepare an analysis of the project for consideration by the Planning Commission
and the City Council.
Work on the General Plan Amendment Study would be completed concurrently with
processing the other entitlements that are requested by the Applicant. Once the
General Plan Amendment Study is complete, Staff would then bring the application to
the Planning Commission for their recommendation to the City Council. The project
would then move forward to the City Council for their consideration.
Single Family
Residential
Open Space
8.1
Packet Pg. 577
Page 5 of 5
Staff has prepared draft Resolutions approving and denying the initiation of the
proposed General Plan Amendment Study. The draft Resolutions are included in this
report as Attachments 2 and 3.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
Although a public notice is not required to review a request to initiate a General Plan
Amendment, the City mailed a notice to surrounding property owners and tenants within
300 feet of the subject project site. Also, as is practice, notices were sent to the list of
potentially interested parties. A public notice was published in the East Bay Times and
posted in the designated posting places. A copy of this Staff Report was provided to the
applicant and was made available on the City’s website.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Staff recommends that the initiation of the General Plan Amendment be found exempt
from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15306, Class 6 of
the State CEQA Guidelines (Information Collection).
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Request Letter from Applicant
2. City Council Resolution Approving the Initiation of a General Plan Amendment Study
for Fallon 55
3. City Council Resolution Denying the Initiation of a General Plan Amendment Study
for Fallon 55
8.1
Packet Pg. 578
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 579
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
(
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
)
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 580
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
(
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
)
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 581
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
(
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
)
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 582
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
(
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
)
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 583
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
L
e
t
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
(
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
)
RESOLUTION NO. XX – 17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * *
APPROVING THE INITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY TO EVALUATE
CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 22 ACRES FROM
RURAL RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURE TO 12 ACRES DESIGNATED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL AND 10 ACRES DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE (APN: 985-0072-005-00)
(PLPA-2017-00062)
WHEREAS, the City received a letter from William Lyon Homes requesting that the City
Council consider initiating a General Plan Amendment Study to change the existing land use
designation of 22 acres from Rural Residential/Agriculture to 12 acres designated as Single
Family Residential and 10 acres designated as Open Space; and
WHEREAS, the applicant anticipates the future development of up to 57 single family
detached homes as part of an age restricted community; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan Amendment Study initiation request has been reviewed in
accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and was
found to be Categorically Exempt under Section 15306, Class 6 of the State CEQA Guidelines;
and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted outlining the issues surrounding the General
Plan Amendment Study initiation request; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and consider all such reports, recommendations,
and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does hereby
approve the initiation of a General Plan Amendment Study to evaluate changing the land use
designation of the study area from 22 acres designated Rural Residential/Agriculture to 12 acres
designated as Single Family Residential and 10 acres designated as Open Space to
accommodate the future development of an age restricted community consisting of 57 single
family detached homes.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Dublin City Council on this 5th day of
December 2017 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Mayor
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 584
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
f
o
r
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
(
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 585
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
f
o
r
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
(
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
RESOLUTION NO. XX – 17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
* * * * * * * * *
DENYING THE INITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY TO EVALUATE
CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY 22 ACRES FROM
RURAL RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURE TO 12 ACRES DESIGNATED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL AND 10 ACRES DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE (APN: 985-0072-005-00)
(PLPA-2017-00062)
WHEREAS, the City received a letter from William Lyon Homes requesting that the City
Council consider initiating a General Plan Amendment Study to change the existing land use
designation of 22 acres from Rural Residential/Agriculture to 12 acres designated as Single
Family Residential and 10 acres designated as Open Space; and
WHEREAS, the applicant anticipates the future development of up to 57 single family
detached homes as part of an age restricted community; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan Amendment Study initiation request has been reviewed in
accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and was
found to be Categorically Exempt under Section 15306, Class 6 of the State CEQA Guidelines;
and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted outlining the issues surrounding the General
Plan Amendment Study initiation request; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and consider all such reports, recommendations,
and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin City Council does hereby deny
the initiation of a General Plan Amendment Study to evaluate changing the land use designation
of the study area from 22 acres designated Rural Residential/Agriculture to 12 acres designated
as Single Family Residential and 10 acres designated as Open Space to accommodate the
future development of an age restricted community consisting of 57 single family detached
homes.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Dublin City Council on this 5th day of
December 2017 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Mayor
8.1.c
Packet Pg. 586
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
D
e
n
y
i
n
g
t
h
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
f
o
r
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
(
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
8.1.c
Packet Pg. 587
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
3
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
D
e
n
y
i
n
g
t
h
e
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
f
o
r
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
(
F
a
l
l
o
n
5
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
Page 1 of 1
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Discussion of Term Limits
Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
At the October 21, 2017 City Council meeting, the City Council agreed to bring back an
item to discuss term limits.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Discuss and provide direction, as needed.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
On June 21, 2016, the City Council agenda included a discussion item regarding the
potential initiation of a ballot measure amending the City’s current term limits for the
Mayor and Councilmembers (Attachment 1). There was no action taken on that item on
that date.
At the October 21, 2017 City Council meeting, the City Council agreed to bring back an
item to discuss term limits.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. June 21, 2016 Staff Report
8.2
Packet Pg. 588
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 589
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 590
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 591
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 592
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 593
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 594
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 595
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 596
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 597
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 598
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 599
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 600
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 601
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 602
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 603
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 604
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 605
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 606
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 607
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 608
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 609
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 610
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 611
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
8.2.a
Packet Pg. 612
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
J
u
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
1
6
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
T
e
r
m
L
i
m
i
t
s
)
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Designate Two Councilmembers to Dublin Pride Week Committee
Prepared by: Rebecca Parnes, Environmental Technician
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider appointing two of its members to the 2018 Dublin Pride
Week Committee. The Dublin Pride Week Committee plans and prepares the annual
spring event, which seeks to engage individuals and groups in action based activities to
help improve the community.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Appoint two City Councilmembers to the Dublin Pride Week Committee for 2018.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
Dublin Pride Week is an annual event that seeks to promote a positive image for the
City of Dublin. The primary objective for Dublin Pride Week is to seek ways to engage
individuals and groups in action-based activities to help improve the community. At the
forefront of this effort is the Dublin Pride Week Committee. The Committee is made up
of Councilmembers, City Staff and various community members and community
organizations, and comes together to plan and prepare the event. Councilmember
participation is a key component of this committee and the ultimate success of Dublin
Pride Week activities. Dublin Pride Week will begin the last Saturday in April (April 28)
and will continue through the first Saturday in May (May 5).
Traditionally, two City Councilmembers have been appointed to serve on the Dublin
Pride Week Committee. In 2017, Councilmember Arun Goel and Councilmember
Melissa Hernandez served as the City Council’s representatives. Staff requests that the
City Council select two Councilmembers to this committee for 2018.
8.3
Packet Pg. 613
Page 2 of 2
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
8.3
Packet Pg. 614
Page 1 of 1
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
DATE: December 5, 2017
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM:
Christopher L. Foss, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Selection of Vice Mayor
Prepared by: Caroline P. Soto, City Clerk/Records Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council’s policy is to select, in December of each year, a member of the City
Council to serve as Vice Mayor for a period of one year. In the absence of the Mayor,
the Vice Mayor would become Mayor Pro Tempore and would assume the temporary
responsibilities of the Mayor.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Determine who shall serve as Vice Mayor for a one-year period.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
Since 1996, the City Council's policy has been to select, in December of each year, a
member of the City Council to serve as Vice Mayor for a period of one year
(Attachment 1). In the absence of the Mayor, the Vice Mayor would become Mayor Pro
Tempore and would assume the temporary responsibilities of the Mayor.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
Noticing not required.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 5-96 Establishing Rules for the Selection of Vice Mayor and
Repealing Resolution No. 5-87
8.4
Packet Pg. 615
8.4.a
Packet Pg. 616
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
1
.
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
5
-
9
6
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
i
n
g
R
u
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
V
i
c
e
M
a
y
o
r
a
n
d
R
e
p
e
a
l
i
n
g
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
N
o
.
5
-
8
7
(
V
i
c
e
M
a
y
o
r