Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-04-1996 PC Agenda • • 1X f PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting-Dublin Civic Center Tuesday-7:30 p.m. 100 Civic Plaza, Council Chambers June 4, 1996 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 4. ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA 5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS-May 21, 1996 6. ORAL COMMUNICATION-At this time,members of the audience are permitted to address the Planning Commission on any item(s)of interest to the public;however,no ACTION or DISCUSSION shall take place on any item which is NOT on the Planning Commission Agenda. The Commission may respond briefly to statements made or questions posed,or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the matter. Furthermore,a member of the Planning Commission may direct Staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. Any person may arrange with the Community Development Director(no later than 11:00 a.m.,on the Tuesday preceding a regular meeting)to have an item of concern placed on the agenda for the next regular meeting. 7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8.1 PA 96-014 Trumark Homes PD Rezone,Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review A request for a PD Rezone,Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review to allow 92 single family detached residential units on approximately 8.9 acres of land. The project is located along the Southern Pacific Right of Way west of Dougherty Road 8.2 PA 94-028 Schaefer Ranch General Plan Amendment and EIR The Applicants are proposing residential and commercial development for their collective parcels totaling 500±acres. The project is located along the northern side of the I-580 freeway,adjacent to the City's western boundary. The proposed project includes the following: A General Plan Amendment;Planned Development Rezoning,Tentative Subdivision Map,Development Agreement and subsequent Annexation.The project components scheduled for consideration at the June 4, 1996 Planning Commission meeting include the Environmental Impact Report and the General Plan Amendment documents. 9. NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9.1 Eastern Dublin Grazing Management Plan and Wildfire Management Plan As the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan EIR requires,the City has completed a Grazing Management Plan and Wildfire Management Plan that will promote the protection of riparian and wetland areas and reduce the risk of open land wildfire while protecting wildlife habitat and other open space values. LOCATION: Wildfire Management Plan-Citywide Grazing Management Plan-Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area 10. OTHER BUSINESS(Commission/Staff Informational Only Reports) 11. ADJOURNMENT (OVER FOR PROCEDURE SUMMARY) CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 4,1996 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff PREPARED BY: Jeri Ram,Associate Plannej SUBJECT: Trumark Homes PD Rezone,Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review RECOMMENDATION: 1)Open Public Hearing 2)Receive Staff Presentation and Public Testimony 3)Close Public Hearing • 4)Deliberate 5)Make motion to adopt Resolutions(Exhibits B and C) GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a PD Rezone,Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review to allow 92 single family detached residential units on approximately 8.9 acres of land. APPLICANT: Trumark Homes 6375 Clark Avenue Dublin,CA 94568 OWNER: Southern Pacific Railroad One Market Plaza,Suite 912 San Francisco,CA 94105 COPIES TO: Trumark Homes Southern Pacific Railroad • Project Planner Trumark Homes File ITEM NO.7 Admin.File F?.: .. LOCATION: Southern Pacific Right of Way west of Dougherty Road ASSESSOR PARCEL: 941-0205-006-10 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: M-1 (Light Industrial)Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: South: East: West: P.D.(Residential), M-1,developed with Agriculture, M-1,developed with Arroyo Vista light industrial uses Dougherty Road light industrial uses and Camp Parks BACKGROUND: On May 14, 1996,the City Council, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission,approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration,Mitigation Monitoring Program on the entire project and General Plan Amendment for the site. The General Plan Amendment changed the land use designation from"Transportation Corridor"to "Medium Density Residential". ANALYSIS: Environmental: The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program were approved by the City Council on May 14, 1996. A copy of the Mitigation Monitoring Program is attached as Attachment 5. General Plan Consistency: This proposal is consistent with the Medium Density Residential Land Use Designation in the Dublin General Plan. The density range permitted by that designation is 6.1 to 14.0 dwelling units per acre. This project is proposed to have 11 dwelling units per acre. The General Plan Amendment that was approved for this project on May 14, 1996,will become effective on June 14, 1996. The PD Rezone that is part of this project, if recommended for approval by the Planning Commission,will go to the City Council for approval on June 11, 1996,and June 25, 1996(for second reading). The General Plan Amendment will be complete prior to the June 25, 1996,date which would 2 be the adoption date of the PD Rezone. Therefore, at the time of adoption of the PD Rezone, this project will be consistent with the General Plan. Planned Development Rezone: The Applicants are requesting approval of a Planned Development (PD) Rezone to establish the General Provisions and Development Regulations that would implement the Medium Density Residential Land Use Designation of the General Plan for the 8.9+ acre project area. The Land Use and Development Plan includes a vesting tentative subdivision map, elevations and site plan and landscaping plan (Exhibit A). The General Provisions and Development Regulations and Conditions of Approval, are set forth in full in Exhibit B. The proposed permitted uses and conditional uses are generally the same as what is presently permitted or conditionally permitted in the City's R-1 Zoning District with the exception of agricultural uses which have now been made prohibited under the PD. Changes have been made to those development standards relating to building site and setbacks to enable detached housing on smaller than average lots. See the chart below: TYPE OF TRUMARK PD STANDARD R-1 ZONING DISTRICT STANDARD STANDARD Building Site Per Land Use and Median Lot Width of 50 feet Development Plan and area not less than 5,000 sq.ft. Corner lot not less than 6,000 sq.ft. Yards/Setbacks Plan 10 and Plan 11(lots 39 & 20 feet A. Front Yard 43) - 3 feet to back of sidewalk or back of curb if no sidewalk exists; Plans 11&12 (except lots 39 & 43) - 5 feet to back of sidewalk or back of curb if no sidewalk exists. B. Rear Yard 10 feet (except lots 2,3,6,74 & 20 feet 75, average 7.5 feet) C. Side Yard 4 feet (1 foot projection of 5 feet (plus 1 foot for each (interior) fireplace/media niche into additional 10 feet that the setback) median lot width exceeds 50 feet up to a maximum of 10 feet. D. Side Yard 5 feet from back of sidewalk or 10 feet. (corner) back of curb if no sidewalk exists unless adjacent parking bay, then 3 feet from back of sidewalk or back of curb if no sidewalk.exists. Approval of the Site Development Review and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map(in particular consistency findings)depend upon the approval of the Planned Development Rezone by the City Council. Therefore,staff recommends a condition of approval that the approval of the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review be contingent upon approval of the PD Rezone by the City Council. Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map: A vesting tentative subdivision map is generally the same as a tentative subdivision map. The major difference is that with a vesting tentative subdivision map, the subdivider"locks in"the ordinances,policies and standards in effect at the time the application for approval of the vesting tentative subdivision map is complete. Processing and analysis of a vesting tentative subdivision map and a tentative subdivision map are the same. The internal circulation of the subdivision has been refined since the environmental document was approved. Access to Sierra Court has been moved approximately 20 feet to the east,which enables additional parking areas to be created. Additionally the roads have been slightly modified to increase public safety access to the units.These minor modifications are not considered significant in terms of environmental review because they reduce impacts rather than create new ones. The revisions have created a better circulation system and lot configuration.The subdivision is proposed to be gated with primary access off of Dougherty Rd.and secondary access off of Sierra Court. The main entry off of Dougherty Rd.has been aligned to match the future extension of Scarlett Drive across Dougherty Rd. Additionally,in the event a road is put through to the north,the entry area now provides for a future intersection. Conditions of Approval have been added to ensure that all improvements are completed to City standards(Exhibit C). As a condition of approval,the subdivider will be required to pay all applicable fees that have been approved by the City. This includes building permit fees,traffic impact fees,and the public facilities fees. The public facilities fee will be required to be paid at the multifamily rate,which is what would be used for this density of project. Additionally,a provision has been added to the conditions of approval so that should the fee be reduced as a result of a recalculation currently underway,the subdivider pay the lower rate. Should the fee be raised,the subdivider would only be required to pay the currently approved fee of$3,332.00 per unit. Site Development Review: The purpose of the site development review process is to promote orderly, attractive and harmonious site and structural development. It addresses building location,architectural and landscape design and theme,vehicular and pedestrian access,on-site circulation,parking and traffic impacts. Y 4 Architecture/Design: The attached plans illustrate the architecture and design of the units. The architecture of the units combines popular elements of traditional design including columns and arches into an eclectic style. Finish designs are primarily stucco with accents of stone and shale. The applicant has worked hard to create a positive design approach to the project. The architecture of the homes conveys a 360 degree design,where elements of design are carried around the home. The color scheme of the project has been modified slightly from the color copies with your packet(Attachment 4). The applicant has revised the materials and colors to create more options of trim and a well thought out color palette(color and material boards will be on display at the meeting). The roofs are heavily featured in the development and become an integral part of the design and environment created by the project. The proposed house design is a heavy type of style,featuring stucco and stone. Generally this type of house would have a heavier concrete tile roof which would balance the house. The applicant is proposing composition roofs with shadow bands to simulate depth and texture. This type of shingle is available in three grades. The applicant is proposing the middle grade (Shadowband Dimensional/30). A townhome project presently under construction, California Highlands(Donlan Canyon), is presently using the heavier grade of shingle (Shadowband Dimensional/40). Presently,the City does not have a policy that encourages or restricts the use of composition shingles. Staff feels that if composition tile is to be used,it should be the heaviest grade that will create the maximum amount of texture and depth on the house. Therefore,we have added as a condition of approval the requirement that the heavier shingle be.used.Additionally,the CC&Rs would require homeowners in the future to replace roof shingles with those of the same grade. Site Plan: The site plan has been carefully designed to open up the look of the project by strategically locating single story units at corner areas. The Subdivider has also provided a housing plan that would have a second story on only one side of the house (Unit 11 without a loft). This will help to break up the two story roof lines in the development thereby providing a more open look. Single story plans tend to have larger footprints and take up a larger portion of a lot. Therefore,the subdivider is proposing that in those instances where the single story is on a corner adjacent a particular two story(unit 10 backing up to the side yard of a unit 12 in your elevations)a special type of easement be used. This"exclusive access easement"will enable the homeowners in the single story plan to use as a rear yard the other homeowner's side yard(see Exhibit A). Nothing could be built in this area by either homeowner and both homeowners would have the ability to access this area for maintenance of their homes. To ensure privacy for both homeowners, special house design considerations have been taken. In those houses(unit 12)that would not have a side yard adjacent the single story house(unit 10),windows of that home would be high 5 PAGE 5 OF • or glass block. This"exclusive access easement"concept has been used successfully in other cities. Staff has worked extensively with the developer and their architects on the site plan for the development. We believe that the orientation of the homes,window placement,comprensiveness of architectural detail in conjunction with the placement of each home has been carefully crafted for small lots without sacrificing quality of design. Landscaping/Walls: The Site Plan and Preliminary Landscape Plan provides for a wide variety of street trees,shrubs,vines,perennials and ground covers. The twelve foot wall along the western perimeter of the site(required to mitigate noise),will be buffered by a small landscape area so that vines and shrubs can buffer the effect of the wall. The landscaping along Dougherty Road will be an average of 8 feet wide with variations in depth to provide visual variety. ' The walls along the perimeters of the development,at Dougherty and along the western property line,have been designed to integrate into the development. The wall will be stucco finished and painted on both sides. The 12 foot wall along the western perimeter will occasionally be off set two feet to provide visual relief and additional planting area. The wall along Dougherty will have more variety in placement,to correspond with the variety of planting setbacks. Staff feels that the applicant has created a project that shows a consistency of design. This is reflected through the integration of all the components of the project, architecture,site plan design and landscaping. This project has been reviewed by other City Departments and affected agencies. Their comments have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit C). Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Resolution recommending approval of the Planned Development Rezone(Exhibit B)and approving the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review(Exhibit C)for PA 96-014,Trumark Homes. *rt ..... ATTACHMENTS: x Exhibit A: Plans: 1) Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 2) Elevations and Site Plan 3) Conceptual Landscape Plans Exhibit B: Resolution of the Planning Commission Recommending Approval of the Planned Development Rezone to the City Council Exhibit C: Resolution of the Planning Commission Approving the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review Background Attachments: Attachment 1: Letter to the Planning Department from Zone 7 dated May 29, 1996 Attachment 2: City of Dublin Site Development Review Standard Conditions and City of Dublin Residential Security Requirements Attachment 3: City of Dublin Public Works Department Typical Public Works General Conditions of Approval(4/96) Attachment 4: Color design packet of project(available to Planning Commissioners-See Exhibit A,No.2,for black and white copy) Attachment 5: Mitigation Monitoring Program(approved May 14, 1996) G:\PA95014\6-4PCSR • VESTING TENTATIVE* TRACT TRACT 6858 - KENSINGTON PARK DUBLIN, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LEGEND PROPOSED DESCRIPTION EXISTING ----- TRACT L4 OVARY COT LNLE CENTER LNE MA RN LINE RETANNG MAIL EASEMENT LINE .v SYORM DRAIN ---m— -- s SANITARY SEVER---m--- WA1ER---r--- S. WATER INLET (S W.L) � • MANHOLE (MN) O j SLOW RIFF (90) s STREET LIGHT �• FENCE — • • — BARR/CAOIE CURB LINE E COVER LINE N.P. N/OIM POINT T.0 FOP CY CURB F.L FLOW LINEP. U.E PI7BLIC U77UTY EASEMENT W. WATER LINE EASEMENT SSf. SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT E V..AF.. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT P.&D.E. PRIVATE 57ORM DRAIN EASEMENT L FEDERAL PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY AI */JEOA COUNTY PM 2481 LOCATION MAP I' = 60' MAP 040 GENERAL NOTES OWNER SOU7FEAN PACE7C 1RANSPLWTAWN COMPANY I MARKET PLAZA SU17E 917 SO MAAOSCO CA 94105 woo/wER: MUMARK HOMES 6375 CLARK AEM/E SU17E 205 DGBLNC CA 94568 ENGOAlk RU"RI-XNSEN AND ASSYILYA/ES K 6601 OMENS ON1£ SVIIE 155 PLEASAN76N. CA 945M 7OTAL AREA 891 ACRES AAA AV.. 941-0205r006-10 ROW OESGNARDM NOT WRW 7W FEW 100--WAR FLOOD ZONE USING 2LNKNG. M-I (LIGHT NWSIR/AL) PRLPO.4DD 20NIN& MANED DEWLOPMENT PROECT SITE LOT .SIZE 22W 1 SF. —N— V „fI 707AL LOIS. 92 SNaE FAMLY OETAC ED HOMES 11''fVl�l N" N� U7N7E4 MA 7ER SUPPLY... "UN SAN RAMCN SEANCES 0/97R,CT S4MIARY SEWER: DU& N SAN PAWN SLRWaS D/SIRICT SIORM GRAN: CITY OF "LIN . MPOGRAPN.0 IWOPMA I7ON WAS PREPARED BY AERIAL OEOOfX CORPORA7KN IN FEAWARY 1996 VICINITY MAP I (9 1 N. FS. PAC-, E �..Y. 961054 vi ZNr . looa , �� � � \ \ PdI6.9 Rlf4. �A{61 ' - \' � LB OediAO 7b u ' 7 \ \ \\don& , �� �Ii •INL/CI \ \ 1 -e SECTION A -A N. TS (12' • LOTS I4-19 I (12' O LOTS 14-19 AND 0-66) 1 AAV 92-66) LC CL 2 AD.. /.'I/RR i fJ/]iiR /TYP1 SECTION B-B ALT.S SECTION C-C NTS xl ARALCD PAD X SECTION D-D N. T.S 41.w AY SECTION E-E SIDEWALK W t CUTLER (T)F.) A1_ Ci 32 961054 IV \ 1k h- 40 M1 . t ' ,ram r G!e .- / �,� -- ;._ .-i1,`_ • ?_ �3 1145 7, --'L io�ser 3�u APN 94/-Y05-2G-00/ s • .F Y�\� `\ �°-- -� — --� ..9—y, 39' !9' 40' I I /i GorC 1�'. r`;N.t `.sXG \\,L .• a,o 24 D 29 ,27 2G 25 ° • r3fzv � 28 Rip/2F° pi{:. ° fan.° Rlf2./y viftJ eo,, . � k� +. (�. � b � 15 4�a ff6 ,� \\ � � . ,% � 7�� o R34a•3�i R!l9.9 t Q'/// JOu � \ '•- '� r 17p D° 4iA 1 m 7 • � ST/SE � i4 23 PlN.�.:' - 3Yi •/ 3{L D I o i v 6.6 p, 334/ 1 ` P31/3� P•3n.b - _ -L_ s @^ � I d U 3� N \ \ Ass c•ervelrRY y \ \ d'ps— 47' 22 ♦ Plfp.O �l (C. �, 9 F ,,..i� �' '1' �• ` �' �\ 4' FOR �SR\ rri7 i /. 3f0.b it e 3I0.7 �i � / 3,r°.7�I - p• si. - tc•ps!. F M L p sf. I u � s,--P.s.�e. y CI !o�\�'r'"/ \s.. � I l, �.' � I� s �, 97 - nn N19.6 F 1 _ P. d'fs.f t�;,.-9_1-i, APN W1-zut,--?1 sxecr NO. 3 961054 • i 1 :- .A,,,e, a1 6�0\.i te`e ;. ;r 2'i'fil; All' ,■ICirl !ilia �1!�A i�i 1'� � N>: i.4.jiis m_ -li, INK';I� J II PIiIIILLi ss, 111 _ m,tr _. !e;Ih: l�l � r ,,,„.. ... 1.101.ill,r, ,}},, II 1 t �t ;IEi��i��r'�ll,l4�"F �;o i • Flu,.. b a o cf `i v TAN +h N. � 1'4��m 11i1 PI cz, ,N I ij last : ; ry. s , • il 00 . A R , ,900' .I.CC�A e,e g t �� 4fl : i ii Ii '. � � �folii:rli::�= V� fie.,.} 014)41111, , ! it NNW yriIl,It....... ■ , /3) j oao: 0'[or lit tillir-71: 14 7' fil&t.'.. ., tz. kart N • *4 4rietwAtt; AikViii,, 1, ill,e7 -"vallplir:. IP.$, , . t... „,..., ,,,,. .,,T,,,,,.,,, , ..,:,.4. ' 1 .a.b rr i�� 1 �/ 71 4 r Ig L O ` ' L DJ11011 R t/� O �dni uG rtll Q7 � �C v 00 1 �C _ WC O� MN I !1I:—)�i, .I I J I. 1 O C J 00 s. I j ___FE liji 2 oo - - - ma ma I OMAN Ipq � J I11� III ROOF PLAN �ti?I v1ii1, fir% .s2 1 �� \ / a MI AIL 1 . _ .. FLOOR PLAN PLAN 10 .~\ :e I—I n I I 3 BEDROOM,2 BATH 0 1 2 ♦ 2 » 1.280 SF. 0 Trumark Kensington Park THE fTOT GROUP,.. Homes — DubLin, California - F . I ara 11 441 ' J d,r \ ROOF PLAN �FFI " k\'4),.,,fr ta 0 1 4 . MI20 , . , .,C I.O � 1�t j I. ME-17771177, 1, - (� ��i '0l67 i i, L� _ L �I�' 3'hlQtl LIMBO �� I. �i � ' I�CJIII q0 we i • rJ 0214 MG IIiI 'IU�: Itry 1 1 h; HALL 1.. 16 r P - .E> L2 O zo-s•x 0AELM22 Jvvx va vU \ / a. agonosau r ',Tip:. /,, • FLOOR PLAN PLAN 11 11 1 n 3 BEDROOM,2 V2 BATH o i z s e n 1,318 SI. • e Truman: Kensington ton Park .rxe cror aaow... Homes • Dublin, California ._ __, JIr WV 11001.MOO I I Mar NOM I 1 1 aza• I I '1 I I I alit _ J I �viik , t ° Itt. I V L —�—! �i 'c:.. ROOF PLAN AIwww% %.' _-'-.,...j.. o:.n U s w uo.u. - 0 31_ �I�JNuNu1 :IAA U � ri 3'MIN _ 1J1((9� / - 1�@!M CYO oo (lir Elf—-1 j m � 1111 ac I Ly E -- — ffinaittat� AIY V'.7E r-- ' Einnnini e; 'O NI i111111■Y 6 afiai R,y . �sug ■ r ' 2 -0, 111> •Z YC'11 1 ii ikeil • Ni 1, o Ala �F 11,:l ' ''' ' A i FLOOR PLAN PLAN 11 r1U T 3 BEDROOM,2 1/2 BATH u,2 1.—�fl. � WITH LOFT 1,434 S.F. 0 Trumark Kensington Park Homes - Dublin, California _ ^� 6 I 0 1 0 1 I I I 1 Ng „,=5^; I ROOF PLAN , J1I :Q(L1,k ELF-1._1 ALT.POOP PLAN 0 2. $ to 20 .01 warty I I /.A,•,.\� ! Lam' 7•�N, .wBE pm° , tL Li, ., 1 a _m " __ i 1:inr, Iq "�� -±:1 _ I_ I 1 I j ''�MUMm,I 1 uu- '� _ : f V El PIRO II •"°�'.coorromio raui a•t ar.w I IIM :m m ]E06 I - _,/ 11 1 � ' I e® 1 I lui.,....., I wDTFA O morOa NAM 0 AT urAAo ���� EMINI sent MINIM 0 ��, 01 SHE0_j Q i 0 0 CDALT.PLAN 12 ;M. -- LOTS ta.2a,at.aT,SO.SALI I I III 01.ea.Ts s,.ea a ea _. mu. eATM a 1 1 1 n1 F ill 8 _ail mli ill ii o i _ gg .. S 9e8e13e l 0.2 YQ ru 2101:05:6;21L2 U e9213013w 11 •> \ /ILJI 1 A /' Y , GI 7 IM II. J <�FLOOR PLAN '-, h �� PLAN 12 I U _— I sl" + 4 BEDROOM,2 1/2 BATH o t a a a to ., OPTIONAL LOFT/BED 4 . - - - 1880 SF. TCUlnark Kensington Park 0 Homes TNe rrn,aaour_ • Dublin, California _ PAGE . .. ...-.. % HEAVY ARCHITECTURAL GRADE \\• r.Y f I COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING \�\ r I t•� � • ' (SEE COLORBOARD) \,1w —77 < I-I/2^STUCCO RECESS " '-'-- ‘ ,7/, -vii , N..„1 fhikt ,g1Wroultis . "..-- .. ,,,,,,„ _...„_ .. ,...,.._::_,„._,,, 1 y4 2 x 6 FASCIA 4 �gp�/iw ouu�w1� e 0 0 NIA, • r m Ckrw �I1 ;7 for ...4._,,, .....,,I nl► 9/ W— ` i Y ,j STEEL SECTIONAL II 1 11 RAISED PANEL GARAGE DOOR — I 11 II it 11-ograii/ v4 II / 1 z 4 o/2 x8 STUCCO TRIM SIDEYARD FENCING LEFT ELEVATION Trull Color FRONT ELEVATION 1-I/2"STUCCO WAINSCOTIN STUCCO FINISH ALT.STONE VENEER (SEE COLORBOARDI sek...z Color O. t ..... '=` -? METAL LOUVER VENTS WITH '' \ ''' =g: ! f - g I-1/2"STUCCO RECESS3' �+ lx4STUCCO TRIM SURROUND y ,ram - /2 x 6 STUCCO TRIM SILL _ a. 2 x 6 STUCCO TRIM " l '2'z--� '^sue -i I I. I 1 I < .r�,- �i \t��� `) I 't n. •Ns�r�rr�rws '�. \ \9 '` / '' ''... '\� nn• N �wwr�imern aio�uuf na�a�II ' s��sa� � I v (.. , n ssurn �' / - �,EMr- _ a.ow:n� i.1:r,'Ij j ' r�. `lam /. •�' tHt/ V4 ' � I ..fin, 1� '".� o-` • , „.. . APE- l' I . _ y_., 06 -n —, '�-- - �IX42 TRIM -2 x 4 STUCCO TRIM SURROUNDS RIGHT ELEVATION (SEE COLORBOARD) 2 x 4 STUCCO TRIM SURROUNDS REAR ELEVATION WOOD SHUTTERS r m cake (SEE COLORBOARD) (SEE COLORBOARD) Accent cake STUCCO CORBEL u PLAN 10 Trumark Kensington Park O THE[TOY 0201,k... Homes - — Dublin, California 8 HEAVY ARCHITECTURAL GRADE WOOD SHUTTERS t „ COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING (SEE COLORBOARD) IMMINNIllnims �.���.■' • J (SEE COLORBOARD) i.Accent Color i� I! 't 1 i�c "' = 1 'I4 I I (i 2 x 4 STUCCO YN,3 �,,y, , ,�,,,., t .�� 3�\` M1 .� I i• imamti �..r. - 1,I 1 ,m Color TRIM SURROUNDS I-I/2"STUCCO RECESS Ts�c i 5 .,�awe A ....7.i \ 111�1 I t ' Air 2 x FASCIA ti t",...?ir! 1 -Jli Barl � �►/— ' x 1 /.,.mini.. • =� i ,,,.i, �/� / l�/�.��-� • '�` T: � j , a�' '!��_ Y OKAA rt i I - .. ma w ' '� STUCCO FINISH 1-1/2"STUCCO WAINSCOTING R'a' — i'a I 1 II f YA 1 ,. ALT.STONE VENEER __ >� �-,O'� q � 11 �I ,1' (SEE COLORBOARD) --—.—— Srwcxo 2 Coe' STEEL SECTIONAL LEFT ELEVATION RAISED PANEL GARAGE DOOR / FRONT ELEVATION !!! 'o I x 4 o/2 x8 STUCCO TRIM Tons Color �wn�ri METAL LOUVER VENTS WITH II ■��lii.w�.�w■���■r,� \• ..tima, /a.•r, f e®i� i.. // l x 4 STUCCO TRIM SURROUND h 12 '�ss„a,._r ��1i raw n�rarigU■ .:t. )3�• / ¢• 4 iMiM ..„ i Tr" ow , 2„ , ....,,,,z,........._....,.. ,,,,,......„4„,fi..,.4,7 ,, __E._._. , „...,,‘ ......r>,:f/r. _ - A. a %� u k*� '.'"— .1 lit N . 1 h� �'=�ICJ Lys ..41.—.$.441.,,,i 1:: I Je_I :_ 01--11-11 by, 0:1 I xCo/zxs STUCCO TRIM SIDEYARD FENCING STUCCO CORBEL RIGHT ELEVATION 2 x 4 STUCCO TRIM SURROUNDS(SEE COLORBOARD) REAR ELEVATION 2 X IO STUCCO TRIM Torn Colo. Tia.Col I-L7-1 7 PLAN 11 012 a ■ Kensington!Y ensing ton Parr 10O Homes THE KiOT GRi • Dublin, California _ 9 1-1 HEAVY ARCHITECTURAL GRADE i I ' 12 COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING (S (SEE COLORBOARD) r (trr �)1 °R � i �, -I r n y► %/dam ,\� �� 1 Al " ),I S , `, �)�V ,4 "' �- 2 X 6 FASCIA 1. rr.-r_T.wnM•12. ..rr_�.�n w ,%... 2 �ma's / .....��r'r_.. - :�i��_��Sw '�i // / „\ ,�_�� _ I-I/2'STUCCO RECESS ' g c,,- _ % "1 I)•• WOOD SHUTTERS .,.. -- ••.,. �I 1 ,, „;aelr-` El %I T j �1 (SnEEy.COLORBOARD) _,,or - 4. N , ,..,_ [FP no �Milli- W on 1� r `\\e yILjv'ir Thal Color TRIM SURROUNDS 4• i - /_O////O,_r _____ ii., F___, , _*___ sl:',.a A It I . 1, AMMONIUM „ - '11 -0--IIIIII 117-11 IF:— 2e" u ---'1 � .: v STEEL SECTIONAL LEFT ELEVATION -- _ r+�, RAISED PANEL I� emu- R. r _ '` GARAGE DOOR FRONT ELEVATION A �s' (e, ,/ :�. 'rya: `,:. ._ F f 0' r�1' lli ! �rrr�.r�r�rr� �" �' /e_ till ,. ...wru».�.'idwamaar .iiiim. B 3.. x., i .,.,' y _cas�lws>awwi� _s_iwrn-na , It ..,__ - i r. Egt I, r-i.-..;--„,-; �� Iii 1-. s mot IL it 1 { ., ,.„u,,,.,.u......,.w4., x�r�au�Afro' ���.���.��������������. T 8 ,.,7 t --, q, ,A'�• EMI II iI I ,-= rr ''� *1 All' \ I-I/2^STUCCO WAINSCOTING suea r c� I Cj• "!!f `;�t'_ ,�✓ ALT.STONE VENEER(SEE COLORBOARD) Ai :l;i _�6 �fp, ;' %j FRONT ELEVATION B7 `. 1 iI �f / fir^- f �� — `No t�I T�Xc Co/or X 8 STUCCO TRIM _ ! , r,� --------- • � ' STUCCO FINISH III III . 4 I` { I Y111 r ., 2 X 4 STUCCO TRIM SURROUNDS ) -e \\--- SIDEDFENCINGSTUCCO CORBEL 2 X 10 TRIM RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION n,. Color 2 X 6 STUCCO TRIM ,,�n-n—=4 PLAN 11 (WITH LOFT) Trumarl: Kensington Park Homes TM[TOOTGROUP._ Dublin, California � l " I /. m Nromtwom HEAVY ARCHITECTURAL GRADE .I I �.�..��.�•m.�r�...a m�s�.� \, COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOFING �� / �y r• o ',.� �������������.•w����� � : (SEE COLORBOARD) �4,/� i t 1 1 _ "/ `` ' r 1—I/2"STUCCO RECESS 1:iS" i° P x . iii • �1 2m 6 FASCIA .....f_ € k -ill /e/�.��• gran • ' .- '�` :6 "` - , llt r color . `y�II �'j-.,...oi-=A..,. /�/Oii - q0, ,......„. ..„, _,..... ., •- ,,, ‘,..-.- �. r k�",, ] y� /Jsi :r- /t %% �I, \�,.. =�' WOOD S - %1`✓� !� W (SEE COLORBOARD) I' !y� Y. I �� Accent cam \S1V 4 , -- ---- �� 1 1.�� �� ,\,` 2 X 4 STUCCO TRIM — .ara i% i5 L��-I UIJU�I --- 17 I�h tpd-�nmill ly II I EER `` I /////_ a J' ALONE U STUCCO WAINSCOTING �" •1 I II II 11. ._-__ (SEE COLORBOARD) 2 x 4 STUCCO TRIM SURROUNDS /7 sracu 1 Color (SEE COLORBOARD) STEEL SECTIONAL That Color LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION 2 X 6 STUCCO TRIM RAISED PANEL GARAGE DOOR 2 X 10 STUCCO TRIM Mtn Color17 METAL LOUVER VENTS WITH t /, I________________ l x 4 STUCCO TRIM SURROUND �„-•; ,i,'.. `-, I, of ," � �� ) I ly 71 �� ii, i in s i j / , / / ,)$iitiolol II p1PL \ 1:/ YM.r EE .21- � jsl — IIIMI ! ' /17.:ji ALT.PLAN 12 �iI �)�}- I L L STUCCO POT SHELF DETAIL },". \ I fi \\�- \ALT. WINDOWS AT SIDEYARD CONDITION SIDEYARD FENCING TO PLAN/0(SEE PLAM 2 X 10 STUCCO TRIM RIGHT ELEVATION 2 x 4 STUCCO TRIM SURROUNDS REAR ELEVATION STUCCO CORBEL (SEE COLORBOARD) r m color STUCCO FINISH , --n PLAN 12 Trumark Kensington .Park THE[TOT GROUP.� Homes — • Dublin, California _z. ii F'.`.—j 4-.... ....... PROPERTY LINE PALL • 70 M 11 40 S9 SI 11 4.MIN}'}Y NUN 0MIN.SIDEYARD 71 ,1Eri '% r - �" IT ioI I '. kt !Jet 1 �.I WY / ' ti /Ir LINE OF TYPICAL FENCING ��j' 11R 1 r. ow 11 11 I 12 12R imi 12 1.71— ;.. • _ . 11R i f RO1E U "LACE/MEDIA �-r i i344 _S / REAR YARD AREA 11R . 12R • TYPICAL FENCE PLAN WHEN • 11 IC MIN M. ADJACENT TO PARKING STALL . 111111111 S. J �- IY MM.TO BACK OF CURB N L Sl _ �' _ •R a 1, a — F4• Aril& • 12R:0 • _�_ .-�---"—'S'-Y BACK OF CURB TYP. ` 0 11R Rmnu P I — . , D: 12R�__12_ IVINDO `NT F, LLS ;� _ O • = U S✓ .KV,Arir;Y .••'•••'N•-..w. / EHI 11 ILLS f'MIN �. I _, �. M 11 N .__ _.._IS v .-w,..,011 • f'MIN » _. 77 offiiie .. „. . . v - j i� •EXCLUSIVE USE EASEMENT i., . . • I. - uw .c /� % f CROSS HATCHING INDICATES •• 11 12 :%�!I/�� 9/ SINGLE STORY 0.00E AREA Amo \ .S'MM. ,___-__, • •Y MSNAT SINGLE STORY • _..._..._..._..__._... I I / \ I I ® . • • INSET 1 u n « FIRST FLOOR .. _f---= SETBACK PLAN :1. al. . Kensington Park Trumark Homes Dublin, California I I • • MINIMAL GLASS AREA MICA/1 GLASS U'-r SILL IIEIGHT RATIS ONLY, CLERESTORY GLASS _ CLERESTORY GLASS_ _. .. _. VIEW TO PRIVATE YAR+) / _ otLmt W ....,.4_,-- ,r: �pB O if, / •Y-S'MIN TO h0 FLOOR CANTILEVERAFWWWrr II - M r 4c,:: 21 I I o 'y1 ��l�i;•• r. '/,�': CROSS HATCHING INDICATES 3 IC :'Oomc, �• r,;ou;pw; II r all r. f SINGLE STORY ROOF AREA iIII mni r� ri.- I' H t l U X:•.•-�tls Il�y�l cro I ` . II t� HIGH GLASS M•-r SILL NEIGIm ipp I II ' I'£ i��������� / "cti• e 1111 Y-v MIN TO EAVES/MKES -1/1. (r)_j Q 00 -- Y-i•MIN.TO I.E FLOOR CANTILEVER _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RISET t. SECOND FLOOR t SETBACK PLAN f— . FrIlti,\,..1%,_,.. Trumark Kensington Park , murs Homes Dublin, California ........ 1 1 SUMMARY Kensington Park • TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES: 92 Dublin, California • SITE AREA: 8.8 AC • DENSITY 10.5 DU/AC • PARKING: 001 • ENCLOSED GARAGES 92 Trumark I.•,o.�Aa (2 SPACES PER UNIT) Homes I 3 + I —""'•-- • GUEST PARKING 69 K_ Ira• "`::�"""' (.75 PER UNIT) TOTAL: 161 •ALL PLAN IWC 11'M AND 13'M WILL BE PLOTTED AS SHOWN •33%OF THE PLAN I I'M WILL IE PLOTTED WITHOUT LOFTS INCLUDING LOTS I.14.27.II.M.71.73 •GENERAL NOTES REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOE THE LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF PERIMETER WALLS.PRATE INTERIOR WALLS AND FENCING.SPECIAL PAVING.ETC. PROPOSED ROAD _- -- - -- HAMMERHEAD TURN-AROUND—� _. __ __ __ _ PER FIRE DEPT.STD. \\, \ 44 . 'I r— IS'SLUG.SE7IACIC —> PROPOSED TRAIL SYSTEM 4 10 KD'G.SETBACK • i— IS'BLD'O.SETIACIC - -_ _1LI — PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ROAD �IDWN. __ _ _ _ — • \, I•' • C� •rJ- •9 •• _ 8 ; "[, Ili z ~Ir• • • ,� Is .•. • •. __ - .�• OPEN SIMCE �—. 1 HAMMER-HEAD TURN-AROUND SECONDARY ACCESS DRIVE •L•171 • . -'- Y -L•SO.OB' PER FIRE DEPT.STD. 3' BUFFER PLANTER FOR .--•'SIDEWALK-ONE SIDE 1 \� DENSE BUFFER PLANTING �-SOUNSTUDYDPREPA PREPARED IT TO SOUND PACXAIL \ CAR WAS MAINTENANCE ROAD 7---SINGLE STORY PORTION -�- CAR WASH SINGLE-STORY PLAN(CROSSED HATCHED( (PLAN I I r/o LOFT( ASSOCIATES.INC.FOR MALL IIT•i.ETC.RESIDENCE ACCESS TO TRAIL \ ----COLLECTOR STREET-SE PAVING -- -- PARALLEL GUEST PARKING-PxIY(TYP.I CURS-TO-CURB • r7 PLANT PALETTE_- 0�' v_ nA .�� 1,. ..,4,, WM 41i7iiit _ :11kte., 1 1, it ......... BrAmm' 111 I — TUBE STEEL FENCE , ��� WOOD SIDE YARD FENCE a> , .•tALE.IDIT.RD,EDrD.r wili ©� — -.._.. . 1i1V piID it .=�_ ..-_ ... , ` '.—Vill •M•AM A.4 '... ‘air';:... IU •- -•----- 6'•8'TALL SOUNDWALL 12'TALL SCREEN WALL TYPICAL UNIT CLUSTER PROPOSED MASITROAMCI ROAD `r•prp[IDT aaIv!Tlil nfKAL CWJK.PUN SUM OM LAIR 't ;.�. S.TALL Matr TAU.WOOD rte.. St[MICAS GM VITUS -ARCINKSIt .DT WTr.' Mat FWD.WALL —.J I•PALL N.[STILL ILnC[ � 1`,-L}'\ r, rTALL WWII•AIA r TALL MOOD FMCS At ,�.� . �j �, —���� III$ II° "O �• �.�'i'.t 7 �i- l"+r t �\ rROrLTTIp[ � Imo•±mod p � �"141 r4id.._ f, d,„ve'._la`Z_.hga r� ''•4, ,„, r '-G. ►p1iER.' llhl`',� Cs .. callrn.:_ '4211ir .. %L. L11ir r 41,E A ail ray ,: A • - $1 . \ ` CR'r 01:. �t C 2 -L.4, ed iio v nca 11 ��► I iD. Cfil a, ®P *3 ---- \',,_.d.J•.o r �'Oro ��, ME •+� ,a i, i7iiI!" 1'q MM I j��a� ai f t- ,ritA ra�a►:�,. a,. 1 .y:. !� � it \k.` ��d .y i TA It 1G� ta� � 4r --\\+�,y�• =�*t..4„.m l!;U,..:1 rAlit,7'7' , 4„imp C k 'Si'� far .,,,%0,ribl �y.qe a .r _�' filpir iis __"� TYi"W+ -'r - --`- :r--vim REIIDERP ACCLV TO TRAILV TALL WOOL I L PARALLEL CAMP rAARr.c PIT,MP.) IT TAU SCR[tn WALL*TM mKAL `DIME PI.VYTD.4 EtJnGD.G VMS • DMEMAT ACCESS rd141111D CLAD OWN LPR PEACE PwAARR rAvr.f.At TIR[rr r PITMD.G ARIA.IOAR•/O B WILL AHD TREES AT ICMI[n MALL r ME wAL11QII \ -OIR�[ MSTD.°MAARMAIKI ROAD ••r'OnDART ACC[. MOVE K r OIItR II.OM St-At uUCTED ARIAS PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN •••,v '....w-.- Trumark Kensington Park ==`°�= °°�'="=° Homes Dublin, California Z3 5:?4aAliIt.geg. eee-r .lI M ` A +I." ldiwo o _ tine-tim.%,. 1.1 44 4,..-ifiri azdratit err-, .4 0 In a 'am Ilft ...--reirdl 1 pil I I 6-1 i r Ls...sous. !!!!..s.:T. 'I t s•r e 14 e........'''''' ...- -TY 71-1 dliN 111 P 1 u *E, , ,i 11.4C1C1 AMA 4166.1Firril 4 .1 111 ktirm"l• Valn MAL. i ir. OP LIVIIANCILD Ph.ING li7 0 1 dllijSA.1 A431 , 1 1 tm. flit'? tVt:ling ut j TYPICAL CLUSTER PI AN Trumark Kensington Park Homes Dublin, California t ( r • i LIGHT FIXTURE i --A I LIGHT STANDARD AND POLE TYPICAL MIRETANOAN•LOCATION NL%IOt.NT ACCESS TO TN AIL • Cli 41 151.r\.'s\>.. . . *".'2rj • .,;-- 4‘ 1 • ; I 1 i tilti 1___Ii lit I 8 • '.! I b V2\17 N.). -4\ kj , • \Di t t;i1 I • • �0J j,c LI I a cij• a". warI u... r�II _._, . . J1.,A ACCESS TO TRAM TYPICAL LICHT STANDARD LOCATION TSID[TYAIX OM ao1'.(iYFltwU PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Qh AND STREET LIGHTING PLAN Trumark , Site Concepts G npenh Homes """' .... I an^23 ^' RESOLUTION NO.96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AND ESTABLISH FINDINGS,GENERAL PROVISIONS,AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A PD,PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING FOR PA 96-014 TRUMARK HOMES WHEREAS,Trumark Homes has requested approval of a Planned Development Rezoning for a residential development consisting of 92 single family dwellings on approximately 8.9 acres of land(APN:941- 205-006-010);and WHEREAS, a complete application for a Planned Development Rezoning is available and on file in the Planning Department;and WHEREAS,on May 14, 1996,the City Council of the City of Dublin approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for this project;and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on the PD Rezone on June 4, 1996; and WHEREAS,proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law;and WHEREAS,the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission approve the Planned Development;and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission did hear and use their independent judgment and considered all said reports,recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings and determinations regarding said proposed Planned Development Rezone: 1. The Planned Development Rezone,as conditioned,is consistent with the general provisions, intent,and purpose of the PD District Overlay Zone of the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan as amended by action of the City Council on May 14, 1996,effective June 14, 1996,prior to the City Council action on the proposed PD Rezone. The Planned Development Rezone will be appropriate for the subject property in terms of providing General Provisions which set forth the purpose,applicable provisions of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance,range of permitted and conditionally permitted uses,and Development Standards; which will be compatible with existing commercial,industrial and residential uses in the immediate vicinity,and will enhance development of this area;and 2. The Planned Development Rezoning will not have a substantial adverse affect on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or public improvement as all applicable regulations will be met;and 3. The Planned Development Rezoning will not overburden public services as all agencies have commented that public services are available;and 4. The Planned Development Rezoning will be consistent with the policies of the Dublin General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential because the project would create development at within the densities allowed by this designation;and EXHIBIT 5. The Planned Development Rezoning will create an attractive,efficient and safe environment through Conditions of Approval;and 6. The Planned Development Rezoning will benefit the public necessity,convenience and general welfare and is in conformance with Sections 8-31.0 to 8-31.19 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance;and 7. The Planned Development Rezoning will be compatible with and enhance the general development of the area because it will be developed pursuant to Conditions of Approval and site development review;and 8. The Planned Developmen Rezoning will provide an environment that will encourage the efficient use of common areas to create an innovative type of neighborhood. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve a Planned Development Rezoning including the following General Provisions and Development Standards for PA 96-014,Trumark Homes,which constitute regulations for the use and improvements of the 8.9±acre parcel 941-205-006-010. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Purpose This approval is for a Planned Development(PD)District Rezoning for PA 96-014,Trumark Homes. This PD District Rezone includes a Land Use and Development Plan,which is represented by materials labeled Exhibit A,stamped approved and on file with the Dublin Planning Department,which include a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map prepared by Ruggeri-Jensen&Associates dated Received May 7, 1996; Preliminary Landscape Plan prepared by Site Concepts California,dated Received April 30, 1996;and Elevations and Site Plan prepared by KTGY Group, Inc.,dated Received May 15, 1996,and Color and Material Board(5 Schemes)prepared by KTGY Group, Inc.,dated Received May 15, 1996.The PD District Rezone allows the flexibility needed to encourage innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies and action programs of the General Plan are met. B. Dublin Zoning Ordinance-Applicable Requirements Except as specifically modified by the provisions of the PD District Rezone,all applicable and general requirements and procedures of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance R-1 District shall be applied to the PD Single Family Residential designated lands in this.PD District. C. General Provisions and Development Standards 1. Intent. This Planned Development District is to be established to provide for and regulate the development of the Trumark Homes Subdivision. Development shall be generally consistent with the Land Use Development Plan. This approval rezones 8.9 acres currently zoned Light Industrial(M-1)to 8.9 acres zoned PD Single Family Residential District(92 dwelling units at 11 dwelling units pei acre). 2. PD Single Family Residential Permitted Uses: The following principal uses are permitted in the PD Single Family Residential district: 2 A. Residential development limited to: 1. Single Family Detached houses Prohibited Uses: The following uses are prohibited in the PD Single Family Residential district: 1. Field Crops 2. Orchards 3. Plant Nurseries Conditional Uses: All conditional uses in the R-1 District are conditional uses in the PD Single Family Residential district with the exception of prohibited uses listed above. SETBACKS AND YARDS Development Standards: Development standards within the PD Single Family district are as follows. A. Minimum Single Family Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for single family detached houses shall be as follows: TYPE OF TRUMARK PD R-1 ZONING DISTRICT STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD Building Site Per Land Use and Median Lot Width of 50 feet and area Development Plan not less than 5,000 sq.ft. Corner lot not less than 6,000 sq.ft. Yards/Setbacks Plan 10 and Plan 11(lots 39 20 feet A. Front Yard &43)-3 feet to back of sidewalk or back of curb if no sidewalk exists; Plans 11&12(except lots 39 &43)-5 feet to back of sidewalk or back of curb if no sidewalk exists. B. Rear Yard 10 feet(except lots 2,3,6,74 20 feet &75,average 7.5 feet) C. Side Yard 4 feet(1 foot projection of 5 feet(plus 1 foot for each additional 10 (interior) fireplace/media niche into feet that the median lot width exceeds setback) 50 feet up to a maximum of 10 feet. D. Side Yard 5 feet from back of sidewalk 10 feet. (corner) or back of curb if no sidewalk exists unless adjacent parking bay,then 3 feet from back of sidewalk or back of curb if no sidewalk exists. 3 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Unless stated otherwise,all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to final occupancy of any building,and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the Conditions of Approval. [PL] Planning,[B]Building,[PO]Police.[PW]Public Works.[ADM]Administration/City Attorney,[FIN]Finance,[F] Dougherty Regional Fire Authority.[DSR]Dublin San Ramon Services District.[CO]Alameda County Flood Control&Water Conservation District(Zone 7). 1. The Land Use and Development Plan is conceptual in nature. No formal amendment of this PD Rezone will be required as long as the materials submitted for the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review are in substantial conformance with this PD Rezone. The Community Development Director shall determine conformance or non-conformance and appropriate processing procedures for modifying this PD Rezone(i.e.staff approval,Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit,or City Council approval of new PD Rezone). Major modifications,or revisions not found to be in substantial conformance with this PD Rezone shall require a new PD Rezone. A subsequent PD rezone may address all or a portion of the area covered by this PD Rezone. [PL] 2. Additions to residences in this project are prohibited. [PL] PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1996. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ' Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Community Development Director G:\PA96014\peres2 4 RESOLUTION NO.96- • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING THE VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR PA 96-14 TRUMARK HOMES WHEREAS,Trumark Homes has requested approval of a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 6858, and Site Development Review(Exhibit A)for a residential development consisting of 92 single family dwellings on approximately 8.9 acres of land at APN:941-205-006-010;and WHEREAS, a complete application for a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review are available and on file in the Planning Department;and WHEREAS,on May 14,1996,the City Council of the City of Dublin approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for this project;and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review on June 4,1996;and WHEREAS,proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law;and WHEREAS,the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission approve the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Development Review subject to conditions prepared by Staff;and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission did hear and use their independent judgment and considered all said reports,recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings and determinations regarding said proposed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map: 1. The Map is consistent with the intent of applicable subdivision regulations and related ordinances. 2. The design and improvements of the Map are consistent with the City's General Plan policies, as amended by the City Council on May 14,1996,effective on June 14,1996,prior to the effective date of this Map, as they apply to the subject property in that it is a subdivision for implementation of a residential project in an area designated for residential development. 3. The Map is consistent with the Planned Development herein proposed for this project and is therefore consistent with the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. 4. The site is located adjacent major roads on 8.9 acres of relatively flat topography and is, therefore,physically suitable for the type and density of development. 5. With the incorporation of mitigation measures from the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Conditions of Approval listed below,the design of the subdivision will not cause environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat or cause public health concerns. 1 EXHIBIT •.. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements,acquired by the public at large,or access through or use of,property within the proposed subdivision. The City Engineer has reviewed the map and title report and has not found any conflicting easements of this nature. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings and determinations regarding said proposed Site Development Review: 1. The approval of this application(PA 96-14)is consistent with the intent/purpose of Section 8- 95.0(Site Development Review)of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The approval of this application,as conditioned,will comply with the policies of the General Plan as amended by the City Council on May 14,1996,and effective June 14,1996,because it will allow development within the densities allowed under the Medium Density Residential Land Use Designation of the General Plan and will not become effective until after the General Plan Amendment is effective. 3. The approval of this application,as conditioned,will comply with the proposed Planned Development Regulations for the project which will allow for residential development at this location. 4. The approval of this application,as conditioned, is consistent with the design review requirements in City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. 5. The approval of this application,as conditioned,is in conformance with regional transportation and growth management plans. 6. The approval of this application,as conditioned,is in the best interests of the public health. safety and general welfare as the development is consistent with all laws and ordinances of the City of Dublin and implements the General Plan as amended by the City Council on May 14,1996,effective June 14,1996. 7. The proposed site development,including site layout,vehicular access,circulation and parking, setbacks,height,walls,public safety and similar elements,as conditioned,has been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development. 8. Architectural considerations,including the character,scale and quality of the design,the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings have been incorporated into the project and as Conditions of Approval in order to insure compatibility of this development with the development's design concept or theme and the character of adjacent buildings and uses. 9. Landscape considerations,including the locations,type,size,color,texture and coverage of plant materials,provisions and similar elements have been considered to insure visual relief and an attractive environment for the public. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve PA 96-014,Trumark Homes Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map(Tract 6858)and Site Development Review application,as generally depicted by materials labeled Exhibit A,stamped approved and on file with the Dublin Planning Department,which include a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map prepared by Ruggeri- Jensen&Associates dated Received May 7,1996;Preliminary Landscape Plan prepared by Site Concepts California,dated Received April 30,1996;and Elevations and Site Plan prepared by KTGY Group,Inc.,dated Received May 15,1996,and Color and Material Board(5 Schemes)prepared by KTGY Group,Inc.,dated Received May 15,1996 and subject to the Conditions of Approval as follows: 2 Jl CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Unless stated otherwise,all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use,and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval. [PL]Planning.[B]Building.[PO]Police.[PW]Public Works.[ADM] Administration/City Attorney.[FIN]Finance.Parks&Community Services[PCS].[F]Dougherty Regional Fire Authori y,[DSR]Dublin San Ramon Services District.[CO]Alameda County Department of Environmental Health.[Z7]Zone Seven. The following abbreviations apply in the"When Required"Column: BP/Building Permit;IMPROV.. Improvement Plans;FM/Final Map;Ongoing/Throughout project; GRAD/Grading Permit. NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. This Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site PL Ongoing Development Review shall not be effective unless and until the Planned Development Rezone Application is approved by the City Council. 2. The approval of the Trumark Homes Vesting Tentative PL Ongoing Subdivision Map is for a two year period and will expire on June 4, 1998. 3. Approval of this Site Development Review shall be valid PL Ongoing for one year,until June 4, 1996. If construction has not commenced by that time,this approval shall be null and void. The approval period for the Site Development Review may be extended six(6)additional months (Applicant must submit a written request for the extension prior to the expiration date of the permit)by the Planning Director upon the determination that the conditions of approval remain adequate to assure that the above stated findings of approval will continue to be met. 4. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable City of PL BP Dublin Site Development Review Standard Conditions and City of Dublin Residential Security requirements (Attachment B to the Staff Report). The final landscaping plan required by those c onditions shall also include sample front yard landscaping plans for approval. 5. The Applicant/Developer shall sign and submit a copy of PL OCC the City of Dublin Standard Plan,Material, Irrigation System and Maintenance Agreement prior to the occupancy of any units. 6. Transformers,irrigation control boxes,backflow devices, PL BP valves,and the like shall be enclosed in vaults,fencing and/or painted out and landscaped,as determined acceptable to the Community Development Director. 3 NC-. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED Location of these items shall be indicated on the Final Landscape Plans. 7. The Applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring PL Ongoing Program adopted by the City Council on May 14, 1996 (Attachment E to the Staff Report) 8. The project shall be designed under the 1994 Uniform B BP Building,Plumbing and Mechanical Code and the 1993 Electrical Code. 9. The Developer shall comply with applicable Dougherty PL BP Regional Fire Authority, Public Works Department, Dublin Police Service,Alameda County Flood Control District Zone 7 and Dublin San Ramon Services District requirements. Prior to issuance of building permits or the installation of any improvements related to this project,the Developer shall supply written statements from each such agency or department to the Planning Department, indicating that all applicable conditions required have been or will be met. 10. The subdivider shall defend,indemnify,and hold harmless PL Ongoing the City of Dublin and its agents,officers,and employees, from any claim,action,or proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents,officers,or employees,to attack,set aside,void,or annul,an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency,appeal board,Planning Commission, City Council,Community Development Director,Zoning Administrator,or any other department,committee,or agency of the City concerning a subdivision or other development which actions is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37;provided,however,that the subdivider's or permittee's duty to so defend,indemnify,and hold harmless shall be subject to the City's promptly notifying the subdivider or permitee of any said claim,action,or proceeding and the City's full actions,or proceedings. 11. The permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance PL Ongoing with Section 8-90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this Site Development Review approval may be subject to the issuance of a citation. 12. A master plotting plan indicating the setbacks,the fencing PL BP locations,unit numbers,appropriate mix of color and material schemes,the street tree plantings and other appropriate details shall be submitted for staff review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for each phase. Plotting plan should show the required mix of 25 4 NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED percent of unit 11's without lofts for each phase to ensure they are mixed throughout the subdivision. This plotting plan may be amended from time to time,subject to staff review and approval. 13. The developer shall provide all homes with cable TV and PL BP telephone. 14. To apply for building permits,the Applicant shall submit B BP six(6)sets of construction plans to the Building Department for plan check. Each set of plans shall have attached an annotated copy of these Conditions of Approval. The notations shall clearly indicate how all Conditions of Approval will or have been complied with. Construction plans will not be accepted without the annotated resolutions attached to each set of plans. The Applicant will be responsible for obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City agencies prior to the issuance of building permits. 15. If occupancy is requested to occur in phases,then all PL BP physical improvements within each phase shall be required to be completed prior to occupancy of units within that phase except for items specifically excluded in an approved Phased Occupancy Plan,or minor hand work items,approved by the Planning Department. The Phased Occupancy Plan shall be submitted for Community Development Director review and approval a minimum of 45 days prior to the request for occupancy of any unit covered by said Phased Occupancy Plan. Any phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase,and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. No individual unit shall be occupied until the adjoining area is finished,safe,accessible,provided with all reasonably expected services and amenities,and separated from remaining additional construction activity. Subject to approval of the Community Development Director,the completion of landscaping may be deferred due to inclement weather with the posting of a bond for the value of the deferred landscaping and associated improvements. 16. Applicant shall have a special sales disclosure with PL FM wording to be approved by the Planning Department that will be used as required handouts to potential buyers at the sales office. This disclosure statement shall describe: A. Close proximity of industrial uses exist immediate south of the subdivision and loud noises may be 5 PAA!E3`�r: • NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED generated during early morning and late evening hours related to industrial operations; B. Presence of a high pressure subterranean fuel pipeline north of the site; C.Phased development with continued construction activity until project is completed,may cause noise and dust. D. Presence of a water treatment facility east of the site. 17. A final lighting plan shall be submitted to the City for PL,PO,PW BP approval demonstrating that the entire area will be adequately illuminated. (Photometrics and lighting plans for the site shall be submitted to the Planning Department and Dublin Police Services for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits). 18. Street A and the secondary access shall be constructed to PW FM Public Works Director specifications as part of the pubic improvements for Phase I. 19. Final Map shall include an exclusive access easement for PL FM those lots designated on the Site Plan(Exhibit A). The easement shall also contain a provision that will enable each homeowner the right to perform maintenance such as painting of their homes. 20. Roof shingles shall be the equivalent of or better than a PL BP Celotex Dimensional/40 Shake Shadowband Shingles. 21. Developer shall provide a water hook up(for a hose)at PW FM the designated car wash area as part of the public improvements. 22. Prior to occupancy of Lots 80,81 and 66 special PL BP soundwalls shall be erected to mitigate exterior noise to 60db,per the noise study conducted by Edward L.Pack Associates dated May 22, 1996. 23. Construction/installation of common/shared fences for all PL BP side and rear yards shall be the responsibility of the developer. 24. All wall or fence heights shall be a minimum 6 feet high PL BP (except in those locations where Section 8-60.55 of the Zoning Ordinance requires lower fence heights)and shall be designed to insure clear vision at all street intersections to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 6 NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED 25. Prior to final approval allowing occupancy of any new PL,B OCC home the physical condition of the subdivision and the lot where the home is located shall meet minimum health, design and safety standards including,but not limited to the following: a. The streets providing access to the home shall be PW complete to allow for safe traffic movements to and from the home. b. All traffic striping and control signing on streets PW providing access to the home shall be in place. PW c. All street name signs on streets providing access to the homes shall be in place. PW d. All street lights on streets providing access to the homes shall be energized and functioning.[PW] PW e. All repairs to the street curb,gutter and sidewalk which may create a hazard shall be required or any non- hazardous repairs shall be complete and bonded for.[PW] PL f. The homes shall have a back-lighted illuminated house number.[PL] PW g. The lot shall be finish graded and final grading inspection shall have been approved by the Building PW Department.[B] h. All sewer clean-outs water meter boxes and other utility boxes shall be set to grade to the approval of the B Director of Public Works.[PW] I. The homes shall have received all necessary F,PW inspections and have final approval by the Building Department to allow occupancy.[B] PW, F j. All fire hydrants in streets providing access to the homes shall be operable to City and DRFA standards.[DRFA] k. All streets providing access to the homes shall be PL improved to an adequate width and manner to allow for fire engine circulation to the approval of the Director of PL Public Works and DRFA.[PW, DRFA]] PL I. All front yards of single family dwellings shall be landscaped.[FL] 7 NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED PL m. All mail-box units shall be at the back of the curb. PL, PO, B n. Exterior lighting shall be provided for stairwells, and dwelling entrances, and shall be of a design and placement so as not to cause glare onto adjoining properties. [PL] PL, PO, B o. Lighting used after daylight hours shall be adequate to provide for security needs. 26. Automatic garage door openers shall be provided and PL, B BP shall be of a "roll-up type" Garage doors shall not intrude into the public right of way. 27. Subdivider shall prepare and City shall approve PL FM Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the project which include, among other things the following: A. Type/gauge of shingle roof shown on plans shall be required for future repairs and replacements; B. Restriction of parking on driveways that are too short and block rights of way, C. Disclosures regarding industrial area in relation to noise and odors, the subterranean fuel pipeline, and the DSRSD water treatment facility. D. Air conditioning units shall not be located in side yards of the units or roof mounted. Air conditioning units must be screened from the public view. E. Side yard fencing adjacent parking cut outs shall not be within 3 feet of curb. F. Exclusive Use Easements, restrictions on structural alteration of wall adjacent easement, uses, and general information. G. Maintenance of Sierra Court restricted access area. Said CC&Rs shall be recorded and a copy delivered to City prior to approval building permits for production units. FEES: 28. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developers shall comply with and/or pay all applicable connection fees and development fees (plus any annual increase) in effect at the time of the tentative map approval. This includes but is not limited to, traffic impact fees, regional traffic impact 8 NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED fees,public facilities fees,inclusionary housing requirements and building permit fees. 29. The developer shall pay a Public Facilities Fee in the PCS BP,OCC amounts and at the times set forth in the City of Dublin Resolution No.32-96,adopted by the City Council on March 26, 1996,(plus any annual increase)or in the amounts and at the times set forth in any resolution revising the amount of the Public Facilities Fee. Said amount is not anticipated to exceed$3,332.00 per unit. 30 The developer shall pay the fee that was the subject of an B BP agreement between the Dublin Unified School District and Trumark Homes LLC approved by the District on May 10, 1996 to mitigate impacts to the District prior to the issuance of building permits. 31. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building Permit,all utility DSR BP connection fees,plan checking fees,inspection fees,permit fees and fees associated with a wastewater discharge permit shall be paid to DSRSD in accordance with the rates and schedules established in the DSRSD Code. No sewerline or waterline construction shall be permitted unless the proper utility construction permit has been issued by DSRSD. A construction permit will only be issued after all of the items referenced in this condition have been satisfied. ENGINEERING: The Engineering Improvements noted PW below shall be constructed prior to occupancy of any unit, unless an exception is granted by the City Engineer. 32. The developer shall comply with the City of Dublin Public PW Works Department Typical Public Works General Conditions of Approval(revised April, 1996). 33. The developer shall obtain any required permits from the PW FM California Department of Fish&Game prior to discharge of water into Alamo Creek. 34. A twenty foot wide emergency vehicle access to Sierra PW FM Court shall be constructed prior to occupancy of any structures. 35. The entrance road shall be designed to accommodate PW FM joint use with the development to the north of the project. The joint use portion of the entrance road shall be dedicated to the public. The extent of this dedication shall be approved by the City of Dublin Public Works Director. 9 NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED 36. The entrance road sha!!be designed so as to align with PW FM the future Scarlett Drive extension to the east. The developer shall provide a striping plan for the ultimate design of the intersection. 37. The subdivision improvement bonds(Performance and PW FM Labor and Materials)shall include 25%of the estimate for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of the project entrance, Dougherty Road and Scarlett Drive extension. It is currently planned that this signal will be installed by others. However,should this signal not be installed at the time of completion of the subdivision improvements and release of the security,the developer shall provide a cash deposit of 25%of the estimate for the installation of a traffic signal to be used by the City for the future construction of the signal. 38. The developer shall reconstruct the structural section of PW FM Dougherty Road,along the project frontage to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 39. The developer shall construct a roadway shoulder along PW FM the eastern side of Dougherty Road from Houston Place to the Camp Parks. This shoulder shall extend to the existing road right-of-way. In addition,The north bound lanes of Dougherty Road shall be overlaid with asphalt concrete. Credit against Dougherty Road traffic impact fees shall be given for this work. 40. Hammerhead turn-arounds shall be designed to the PW FM satisfaction of City of Dublin Public Works Director. No parking shall be allowed in the turn-around areas. 41. Security gates proposed for this project shall be PW FM constructed on the private section of the entrance road. Adequate storage area for incoming cars shall be provided to prevent queuing onto the public portion of the access portion of the.entrance. 42. The developer shall dedicate to the City of Dublin a 15 PW FM foot wide emergency vehicle access easement along the eastern portion of lot B. The developer shall construct a pedestrian/bicycle path in this easement subject to approval of the City of Dublin Public Works Director. 43. The emergency vehicle access easement within"A"Street PW FM shall be extended to lot"B." 10 NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED 44. The perpendicular parking spaces shall be twenty feet. PW FM These spaces may be reduced 2 feet where there is an adequate overhang for vehicle bumpers. 45. The developer shall obtain the required permits from Zone PW FM 7 to discharge storm water and construct drainage improvements within the creek bank area. 46. The developer must obtain proper easements for work PW FM outside the subdivision boundaries. The proposed swale along the north property line shall be construct in accordance with City Standard Plan Number CD 404. Maintenance of this ditch shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. 47. The ditch along the north property line shall be designed PW FM to prevent flooding in the event an inlet along the ditch is plugged. 48. The developer shall provide a 3 foot minimum area behind PW FM the face of curb where parallel parking is provided along "A"Street. 49. The access driveway for DSRSD along Dougherty Road PW FM shall be constructed to the satisfaction of City of Dublin Public Works Director with input from DSRSD. 50. The developer shall construct a pedestrian railing on both PW FM sides,along the entire length of Alamo Creek bridge. 51. All private courts and streets shall be under common PW FM ownership(fee title). These areas shall be the responsibility of the homeowners association to maintain. 52. Private cross access easements shall be established PW FM along all common driveways. 53. Street shall have two 12 foot minimum travel lanes. PW FM Additional width shall be added to provide parking. "A" street shall be constructed as part of phase I. PUBLIC SAFETY: PW GRAD 54. Applicant shall comply with Dougherty Regional Fire F Ongoing Authority requirements regarding access and fire,life safety issues. 55. For production units the first lift of asphalt concrete will be PL B required by phase on the subdivision streets prior to combustible construction. 56. Subdivider shall provide access to gated areas in a PO,F FM manner acceptable to DRFA and Dublin Police Departments. 11 PAGE C.C. . NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED 57 Any staggering of the wall along Dougherty Road shall be PL, PO FM at no greater than a 45 degree angle, to ensure public safety. 58. Prior to delivery of combustible materials, sufficient water F BP storage and pressure shall be available at the site to the satisfaction of Doughtery Regional Fire Authority (DRFA). Fire hydrants shall be installed at the locations approved by DRFA in accordance with the Standards at the time of development. At the time of construction of the roadway, raised blue reflectorized traffic markers shall be epoxied to the center of the paved street opposite each hydrant. 59. A. Prior to issuance of any building permits, developer PW, PL, B , F, BP shall have an executed agreement with DSRSD agreeing DSR to upgrade the water treatment method of Turnout 1, adjacent the site along Dougherty Road, which will eliminate gaseous chlorine from the site and replace it with a system compatible, from a safety perspective, with adjacent residential uses. PW, PL, B, F, OCC B. Prior to occupancy of residences, all necessary DSR treatment upgrades for Turnout 1 shall be installed. This may include providing adequate truck access from the project site to Turnout 1 for delivery of supplies and/or other improvements. All such improvements shall be done to the satisfaction of the DSRSD, DRFA and Dublin City Engineer. 60. A minimum setback of 50 feet shall be established and PL, B, PW FM maintained from the petroleum pipeline and from any habitable structure on the project site. Said setback shall be shown on the final map. 61. A subsurface investigation, including recovery of soil and PW, PL FM ground water samples, shall be undertaken to address potential impacts from the adjacent petroleum pipeline and former rail transfer facility. 62. The property shall be monitored by an environmental PW GRAD professional during demolition and grading activities to observe areas which may have been obscured by remnant structures, paving or fill material. Recommendations of the environmental professional shall be followed during the site grading and construction. 63. Prior to occupancy of any production unit, the soundwalls PL, B OCC as required by the Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted by the City Council on May 14, 1996, shall be completed. DSRSD: 64. Prior to issuance of any building permit, complete DSR IMPROV. improvement plans shall be submitted to DSRSD that conform to the requirements of the Dublin San Ramon Services District Code, the DSRSD "Standard Procedures, 12 PAGE 1-1) r NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED Specifications and Drawings for Design and Installation of Water and Wastewater Facilities",all DSRSD potable and recycled water and sewer Master Plans and all DSRSD policies. 65. All mains shall be sized to provide sufficient capacity to DSR IMPROV. accommodate future flow demands in addition to each development projects demand. Layout and sizing of mains shall be in conformance with DSRSD utility master planning. 66. Sewers shall be designed to operate by gravity flow to DSR IMPROV. DSRSD's existing sanitary sewer system. Pumping of sewage is discouraged and may only be allowed under extreme circumstances following a case by case review with DSRSD staff. Any pumping station will require specific review and approval by DSRSD of preliminary design reports, design criteria, and final plans and specifications. The DSRSD reserves the right to require payment of present worth 20 year maintenance costs as well as other conditions within a separate agreement with the applicant for any project that requires a pumping station. 67. Domestic and fire protection waterline systems for Tracts or DSR IMPROV. Commercial Developments shall be designed to be looped or interconnected to avoid dead end sections in accordance with requirements of the DSRSD Standard Specifications and sound engineering practice. 68. DSRSD policy requires public potable and recycled water DSR IMPROV. and sewer lines to be located in public streets rather than in off-street locations to the fullest extent possible. If unavoidable, then public sewer or potable and recycled water easements must be established over the alignment of each public sewer or water line in an off-street or private street location to provide access for future maintenance and/or replacement. 69. Prior to approval by the City of a grading permit or a site DSR IMPROV. development permit, the locations and widths of all proposed easement dedications for water and sewer lines shall be submitted to and approved by DSRSD. 70. All easement dedications for DSRSD facilities shall be by DSR FM separate instrument irrevocably offered to DSRSD or by offer of dedication on the Final Map. 71. Prior to approval by the City for Recordation,the Final Map DSR FM shall be submitted to and approved by DSRSD for easement locations,widths,and restrictions. 13 NO. CONDITION TEXT RESPOND. WHEN AGENCY(S) REQUIRED 72. Prior to issuance by the City of any Building Permit, all DSR BP improvement plans for DSRSD facilities shall be signed by the District Engineer. Each drawing of improvement plans shall contain a signature block for the District Engineer indicating approval of the sanitary sewer or water facilities shown. Prior to approval by the District Engineer, the applicant shall pay all required DSRSD fees,and provide an engineer's estimate of construction costs for the sewer and water systems, a performance bond, a one-year maintenance bond, and a comprehensive general liability insurance policy in the amounts and forms that are acceptable to DSRSD. The applicant shall allow at least 15 working days for final improvement drawing review by DSRSD before signature by the District Engineer. 73. The Applicant shall work with DSRSD regarding the DSR FM location of public utility easements for potable and recycled water lines and sewer lines coinciding with the common(HOA)and access road areas along the south side of the project site from Dougherty Road to the western project limit. 74. The applicant shall hold DSRSD,its Board of Directors, DSR Ongoing commissions,employees,and agents of DSRSD harmless and indemnify and defend the same from any litigation, claims,or fines resulting from the construction and completion of the project. ZONE 7: 75. The Applicant shall conform to the requirements of Zone 7 PW,Z7 FM as indicated in their correspondence to the Planning Department dated May 29, 1996,Attachment A, to the staff report. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1996. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Community Development Director G:\PA96-14\peresl 14 MAY-30-96 THU 09:45 ZONE 7 FLOOD CONTROL FAX NO. 5104845840 P.01 �P�E0.RESOv�C� a e ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 7041 Koll Center Parkway,Suite 170,Pleasanton,CA 94566 510/484-5805 'Nq '` Fax 510/484-5840 May 29, 1996 Line F Ms. Jeri Ram, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Dublin P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 RE: Trumark Homes Site Development Review (PA 96-014) Tentative Tract Map No. 6858 - Kensington Park Dear Ms. Ram: With reference to the meeting held on May 29, 1996 between Tim Tucker of City of Dublin, Michael Maples of Trumark Homes, Eddie Sieu of Ruggeri-Jensen and Associate and staff of Zone 7, this letter is written to supersede previous letters dated May 21, 1996 and March 15, 1995. The applicant is considering a development of a 92-unit small lot detached single family residential project. The applicant also proposes to dedicate Lot B of the proposed project to Zone 7. This reach of Alamo Creek (Line F) is unimproved and is currently not owned nor maintained by Zone 7. Listed below are our comments and recommendations for your consideration: 1. Zone 7 recommends that the reach of Alamo Creek between Dublin Meadows and the Confluence with Line J, to the south, have sufficient capacity to convey the 100-year flood flow with maintenance road designed to Zone 7 standards. 2. The storm drain system of the proposed development shall be designed so as to avoid transfer of runoff between adjacent drainage basins. 3. A minimum setback of 20 feet from (a) the top of bank to property line , or (b) a 2.5 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) projection from the toe of the arroyo to the top of ground at property line (whichever is greater), should be provided. No buildings or permanent structures should be constructed within this setback area. 4. In the event that no channel improvement is needed as confirmed by a geotechnical engineer, a 2 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical) slope channel projection from toe of the arroyo will be acceptable for setback purposes, AITACHME?# 1 41/ MAY-30-96 THU 09:46 ZONE 7 FLOOD CONTROL FAX Na 5104845840 P.02 Ms. Jeri Ram, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Dublin May 29, 1996 Page 2 5. An access road for maintaining the arroyo should be constructed at the top of bank within the 20-foot setback area. This access road should have a minimum width of 15 feet and an inside turning radius of at least 35 feet. The access road should also be graded to drain away from the channel at a 2% (minimum) cross-slope into a V-ditch. Cross drains should be constructed at low points on the road and should be spaced at intervals not greater than 400 feet. 6. Areas adjacent to the flood control right-of-way should be graded to drain away from the arroyo and to the on- site storm drain system. 7. Drainage entering the arroyo should be protected with outfall structures such as shown on ACFC&WCD Standard Drawing SF-605 (copy attached). 8. The channel right-of-way should be fenced with six-foot black vinyl-clad chain-link fencing. Other fencing, such as decorative metal fencing, is acceptable to zone 7 provided that the City, or another entity, is responsible for its upkeep and repair. 9. A soils report and/or investigation should address the stability of the existing arroyo banks under the worst case scenario. Any recommended repairs should be implemented. 10. Any proposed landscaping in the arroyo area should conform to the Alameda County Flood Control Revegetation Manual. Landscaping may be established by hand watering or drip irrigation; however, no permanent irrigation system should be installed in the arroyo area. In addition, the setback area adjacent to the top of bank may need to be wider than 20 feet to accommodate revegetation. 11. Improved channel side slopes should not be steeper than 21/2:1 in cut. 12. Arroyo bends of less than 8o0 feet in radius should be protected from erosion. Bank protection may include rock riprap, grouted rock riprap or other acceptable means. Rock riprap covered with earth may be used for a more natural appearance. 13. Special Drainage Area 7-1 was established by the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (ACFC&WCD) Board (Resolution 6922, May 17, 1966) to provide for a program of flood control improvements along r F/ r MAY-30-96 THU 11:23 ZONE 7 FLOOD CONTROL FAX NO. 5104845840 P.01 Ms. Jeri Ram, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Dublin May 29, 1996 Page 3 the major streams and arroyos within Zone 7 of ACFC&WCD. Ordinance No. 53 of the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prescribes fees and charges within SDA 7-1 to be collected at the time of issuance of a building or use permit. The fees and charges so collected are used to finance SDA 7-1 flood control improvements. 14. This arroyo is designated a proposed Special Drainage Area (SDA 7-1) facility. Under this program the developer would become eligible for SDA 7-1 reimbursements provided the developer enters into an agreement with Zone 7 before any work is done. The developer must also grant fee title to the arroyo right- of-way including the 20-foot setback area to Zone 7. 15. Zone 7 is responsible for enforcement of the Groundwater Protection Ordinance (No. 73-68). Known water wells without a documented intent of future use, filed with Zone 7, are to be destroyed prior to any demolition or construction activity in accordance with a well destruction permit obtained from Zone 7. Other wells encountered prior to or during construction are to be treated similarly. 16. Zone 7 owns and maintains a 24-inch Dougherty Pipeline which is located on the northeast and east side of the project. A Zone 7 encroachment permit is required prior to any work or access within the waterline easement. Please contact Jaime Rios at the Water Quality Section at 484-2600, extension 234, before beginning any construction in this waterline easement. Please feel free to give Wayne Huber or the undersigned a call if you have any questions or comments. Very truly yours, Yan Kee ChYr�alln Chief, Flood Control Engineering YKC:as attachment cc: Lee Thompson, City of Dublin Tim Tucker, City of Dublin Wayne Huber, Zone 7 .\6lC10.p.%OI4.yke CITY OF DUBLIN SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARD CONDITIONS All projects approved by the City of Dublin shall meet the following standard conditions unless specifically exempted by the Planning Department. 1. Final buidine and site development plans shall be reviewed and approved rior to the issuance of a building: by the Planni:ho Department staff p Permit. All such plans shall insure: a. That standard commercial or residential security requirements as established by the Dublin Police Department are provided. b. That ramps, special parking spaces , signing, and other appropriate physical features for the handicapped, are provided throughout the site for all publicly used facilities. c. That continuous concrete curbing is provided for all parking stalls . d. That exterior lighting of the building and site is not directed onto adjacent properties and the liEht source is shielded from direct offsite viewing. e. That all mechanical equipment, including electrical and gas architecturally screened from view, and that electrical meters, is a'" transformers are either undergrounded or architecturally screened. f. That all trash enclosures are of a sturdy material (preferably masonry) and in harmony with the architecture of the building(s) . g. That all vents, gutters, downspouts, fleshings, etc. , are painted to match the color of adjacent surface. h. That all materials and colors are to be as approved by the Dublin ri � Planning Department. Once constructed or installed, all improvements are to be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. . Any chances which affect the exterior character shall be �- • resubmitted to the Dublin Planning Department for approval. • i That Each parking ing space designated for compact cars be identified ,� l Car Only" or its with a pavement marking readingSma__ equivalent, and additional signing be provided if necessary. j . That all exterior architectural elements visible from view and no: detailed on the plans be finished in a style and in materials in harmony With the exterior of the building. ; review That all other public agencies that require re iew of the project be supplied with copies of the final building and site plans and i li obtained With at least their minimum Code that compliancebe requirements. • 2. Final landscape plans, irrigation system plans, tree Preservation technioues, and guarantees, shall be reviewed and approved by the Dublin Planning Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. All such submittals shall insure: • • a. That plant material is utilized which will be capable of healthy growth within the given range of soil and climate. b. That proposed landscape screening is of a height and density so that it provides a positive visual impact within three years from the time of planting. c. That unless unusual circumstances prevail, at least 75% of the proposed trees on the site are a minimum of 15 gallons in size, and at least 50% of the proposed shrubs on the site are minimum of 5 gallons in size. d. That a plan for an automatic irrigation system be provided which . assures that all plants get adequate water. In unusual • circumstances, and if approved by Staff, a manual or quick coupler system may be used. e. That concrete curbing is to be used at the edges of all planters and paving surfaces. f. That all cut and fill slopes in excess of 5 feet in height are • rounded both horizontally and vertically. g. That all cut and fill slopes graded and not constructed on by September 1, of any given year, are hydroseeded with perennial or native grasses and flowers, and that stock piles of loose soil existing on that date are hydroseeded in a similar manner. h. That the area under the drip line of all existing oaks, walnuts, etc., which are to be saved are fenced during construction and grading operations and no activity is permitted under them that will cause soil compaction or damage to the tree. i. That a guarantee from the owners or contractors shall be required guaranteeing all schrubs and ground cover, all trees, and the irrigation system for one year. j. That a permanent maintenance agreement on all landscaping will be required from the owner insuring regular irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement. 3. Final inspection or occupancy Permits will not be granted until all construction and landscaping is complete in accordance with approved plans and the conditions required by the City. • �0 CITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza Dublin CA 94568 (510)833-6630 TYPICAL PUBLIC WORKS GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The Developer and it's representatives(engineer,contractor,etc.)must meet and follow all the City's requirements and policies,including the Urban Runoff Program and Water Efficient Landscaped Ordinance. ARCHAEOLOGY: 1. If,during construction,archaeological materials are encountered,construction within 100 feet of these materials,shall be halted until a professional Archaeologist who is certified by the Society of California Archaeology(SCA)or the Society of Professional Archaeology(SOPA)has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation measures,if they are deemed necessary. BONDS: 2. The developed shall provide Performance(100%),labor and material(50%)securities and a cash monumentation bond to guarantee the installation of subdivision improvements,including streets, drainage,grading,utilities and landscaping subject to approval by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to approval of the Final Map. 3. Prior to acceptance of the project as complete and the release of securities by the City: a) All improvements shall be installed as per the approved Improvement Plans and Specifications. b) All required landscaping shall be installed. c) An as-built landscaping plan prepared by the project Landscape Architect and a declaration by the Project Landscape Architect that all work was done under his supervision and in accordance with the recommendations contained in the landscape and soil erosion and sedimentation control plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Director/City Engineer. _ 1 _ ATTACHE 3 Rev: 4/96 • • d) An as-built grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer,including original ground surface elevations,as-graded ground surface elevations,lot drainage,and locations of all surface and subsurface drainage facilities. e) A complete record,including location and elevation of all field density tests,and a summary of all field and laboratory tests. f) A declaration by the Project Civil Engineer and Project Geologist that all work was done in accordance with the recommendations contained in the soil and geologic investigation reports and the approved plans and specifications. 4. Upon acceptance of the improvements and receipt of required submittals,the performance security may be replaced with a maintenance bond that is 25%of the value of the performance security. The maintenance bond is released one year after acceptance of the project and after the repair of deficiencies,if any,are completed. 5. The labor and materials security is released upon acceptance of the improvements,provided no liens are filed against the developer on this project. CRF.FK: 6. Buildings shall be no closer than 20 feet from top of the bank along the Creek,where the top of bank is either the existing break in topography,or a point at the existing ground line which is the intersection of a line on a two-horizontal-to-one-vertical slope begun at the toe of the slope in the Creek,whichever is more restrictive. DRAINAGF: 7. Each lot shall be so graded as not to drain on any other lot or adjoining property prior to being deposited to an approved drainage system. 8. Where possible,roof drains shall empty onto an approved dissipating device and then over lawn or other planted areas to street or approved drainage facility. Concentrated flows will not be allowed to drain across sidewalk areas. 9. An 18"minimum diameter reinforced concrete pipe(RCP)shall be used for all public storm drain main lines and 12"minimum diameter RCP shall be used for laterals connecting inlets to main drain line. 10.Under-sidewalk drains(curb drains)shall be installed on both sides of driveway approaches. 11.Storm drainage detention facilities shall be designed to contain the 100-year storm occurrence including 1 foot of freeboard. • 2 _ Rev: 4/96 12.In case that the detention basin outlet fails and the basin cannot contain the 100-year storm,streets must be designed so that the overflow release shall directed to the subdivision streets and shall be contained in the road right-of-way. 13.Storm drainage facilities shall be designed to meet the following capacity: Drainage area Design Storm less that 1 sq.mile 15 year 1 to 5 sq.miles 25 year over 5 sq.miles 100 year 14.No buildings or other structures shall be constructed within a storm drain easement. 15.Developer shall provide"trash racks"where storm drainage improvements intercept natural drainage channels. An all-weather maintenance road shall be constructed to the trash racks. 16.Concrete V-ditches shall be constructed on slopes 10 feet and higher in accordance with City Ord. 56-86. These V-ditches shall have a 5%minimum slope. 17.A 6"minimum diameter subdrian shall be installed in all swales that are to be filled. 18.All subdrains shall tie into storm drain catch basins or manholes at the downstream end of the subdrain. There shall be a clean-out at the upper end of all subdrains. 19.Downhill cul-de-sacs must provide a storm drain overflow corridor to an approved drainage facilities. This corridor shall be design to prevent flooding of building pads in case the street inlet is obstructed. 20.Streets designed with sump areas shall have a curb inlet at the low spot and two additional inlets within 50 feet of the low area. 21.No drainage shall be directed over slopes. 22.The storm drainage system shall be designed and constructed to the standards of the City of Dublin or as may be modified by the Public Works Director. 23.All slopes 10 feet or higher will have a concrete V-ditch installed at the toe of the slope. These ditches shall discharge into natural drainage channels or an adequate storm drain system. 24.Drainage in all concrete ditches shall be picked up and directed to the bottom of an approved drainage channel.The slope on these ditches shall not be less than 5%. 25.All concentrated storm drain flow shall be discharged into the established drainage channels,not onto the slopes. 65 - 3 - Rev: 4/96 • 26.All public streets shall drain into storm drain systems before being discharged into established drainage channels. DUST: 27.Areas undergoing grading,and all other construction activities,shall be watered,or other dust- palliative measures may be used,to control dust,as conditions warrant or as directed by the Public Works Director. NPDF : General Construction: 28.The applicant shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)for review and approval by the City prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits. The SWPPP shall be implemented by the general contractor and all subcontractors and suppliers of material and equipment. Construction site cleanup and control of construction debris shall also be addressed in the SWPPP. Failure to comply with the approved SWPPP will result in the issuance of correction notices,citations or a project stop work order. 29.Construction access routes shall be limited to those approved by the Public Works Director and shall be shown on the approved grading plan. 30.Gather all construction debris on daily and place them in a covered dumpster or other container which is emptied or removed on a weekly basis. A secondary containment berm shall be constructed around the dumpster. When appropriate,use tarps on the ground to collect fallen debris or splatters that could contribute to storm water pollution. 31.Remove all debris from the sidewalk,street pavement and storm drain system adjoining the project site daily or as required by the City inspector. During wet weather,avoid driving vehicles off paved areas. 32.Broom sweep the sidewalk and public street pavement adjoining the project site on a daily basis. Caked on mud or dirt shall be scraped from these areas before sweeping. 33.Install filter materials(e.g.gravel fillers,filter fabric,etc.)at all on-site storm drain inlets and existing inlets in the vicinity of the project site prior to: 1)start of the rainy season(October 15) 2)site dewatering activities, 3)street washing activities, 4)saw cutting asphalt or concrete Filter materials shall be cleaned or replaced as necessary to maintain effectiveness and prevent street flooding. Dispose of filter particles in an appropriate manner. 34.Create a contained and covered area on the site for the storage of bags of cement,paints,flammable, oils,fertilizers,pesticides or any other materials used on the project site that have the potential for being discharged to the storm drain system. 6,6 4 . — - Rev: 4/96 35.Never clean machinery,tools,brushes,etc.or rinse containers into a street,gutter,storm drain or stream. See`Building Maintenance/Remodeling"flyer for more information. 36.Concrete/gunite supply trucks or concrete/plasters or similar finishing operations shall not discharge wash water into street gutters or drains. 37.Minimize the removal of natural vegetation or ground cover from the site in order to reduce the potential for erosion and sedimentation problems. All cut and fill slopes shall be stabilized as soon as possible after completion of grading. No site grading shall occur between October 15 and April 15 unless detailed erosion control plan approved by the Public Works Director and implemented by the contractor. 38.Fueling and maintenance of vehicles shall be done off-site unless an approved fueling and maintenance area has been approved as part of the SWPPP. Residential. 39.The project plans shall include storm water pollution prevention measures(SWPPP)for the operation and maintenance of the project subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Director. The SWPPP shall identify Best Management Practices(BMPs)appropriate to residential construction activities conducted on-site to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. 40.The SWPPP shall include erosion control measures to prevent soil,dirt and debris from entering the storm drain system,in accordance with the regulations outlined in the most current version of the ABAG Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook or State Construction Best Management Practices Handbook. 41.The applicant is responsible for ensuring that all contractors,subcontractors,and suppliers are aware of,and implement,all storm water quality measures and implement such measures. Failure to comply with the approved construction BMPs will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations and/or a project stop order. 42.Prior to the commencement of any clearing,grading or excavation resulting in a land disturbance greater than five acres,the developer shall provide evidence that a Notice of Intent(NOI)has been submitted to the California State Water Resources Control Board. A copy of the SWPPP shall be kept at the construction site at all times. 43.All on-site storm drain inlets must be labeled"No Dumping-Drains to Bay"using an approved methods. 44.All metal roofs and roof mounted equipment(including galvanized)shall be coated with a rust- inhibitive paint. 45.Trash enclosures and/or recycling area(s)must be completely covered;no other area shall drain onto this area. Drains in any wash or recycling area shall not discharge to the storm drain system. Drains should connect to the sanitary sewer. Sanitary connections are subject to the review,approval and conditions of the DSRSD. _ s Rev: 4/96 4// ��� CITY OF DUBLIN ‘ ..: P.O.Box 2340,Dublin,California 94568 • City Offices,100 Civic Plaza,Dublin,California 94568 CITY OF DUBLIN RESIDENTIAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS City Ordinance No. 21-89 1988 Building Code Section 4101 1. Exterior doors. All exterior wood doors shall be of solid wood construction, no less than 1 3/4 inches thick or hollow metal doors. Except for sliding glass doors, exterior doors shall not have glazing larger than 2" unless glazing is 1/4" tempered glass. 2. Locking devices. Exterior swinging doors shall have a lock on the latching device and an auxiliary cylinder dead-bolt. The dead-bolt shall be hardened steel and have a 1" throw. If the cylinder of the lock protrudes from the face of the door it shall be fitted with a cylinder ring guard so it cannot be gripped with pliers or other wrenching devices. Double doors shall have the inactive leaf secured with flush bolts at top and bottom. The bolts shall be hardened steel 1/4" minimum in diameter and shall engage a metal strike plate to a minimum depth of 3/8". 3. Strike plates. Strike plates for wood jambs shall be the high security type and shall be secured with a minimum of two wood screws 3" long which shall engage the door studs. 4. Jambs. Inswinging doors with wood jambs shall have rabitted jambs. The jambs on the strike side shall have solid shims above and below the strike plates and the opposite jamb shall have solid shims at the level of the strike plate. Both door studs shall be reinforced with horizontal solid blocking at the approximate height of strike. 5. Hinges. Exterior hinges and hinges of outswinging doors from the garage to the dwelling shall have non-removable pins. 6. Sliding glass doors. Sliding glass doors shall comply with Chapter 54. Sliding glass doors shall be fitted with a locking device that shall engage the strike sufficiently to prevent its being disengaged by any possible movement of the door within the space or clearances provided for installation and operation. The bolt and strike shall be reinforced by hardened material so as to prevent their separation by pulling, prying or similar attack. An auxiliary locking device shall be installed on the door which may be a pin, lock, or similar device of not less than 1/4" diameter. The pin shall be of hardened material and engage the metal portion of the sliding door. The primary locking device shall be operable by a keyed or code lock inside. Doors with 2 sliding panels shall be locked at the meeting rails and shall have an auxiliary locking device as described above. 7. Entry vision. All main or front entry doors shall be fitted with a viewing device having a field of view of not less than 180 degrees. Administration(415)833-6650•City Council(415)833-6605•Finance(415)833-6640•Building Inspection(415)833-6620 Code Enforcement(415)833-6620 • Engineering (415)833-6630 • Planning(415)833-6610 Police(415)833-6670 • Public Works(415)833.6630 • Recreation(415)833-6645 8. Windows. All accessible dwelling windows shall be secured as follows: a) Sliding glass windows shall be secured on the inside with a locking device capable of withstanding prying or wrenching. An auxiliary lock shall be installed on each sliding window that prevents movement in the sliding track. b) Louvered windows shall not be used within eight feet of ground level, adjacent structures, or fire escapes. c) Casement type windows shall be secured with a metal to metal locking device contacting both frames of the window at the meeting edge. Auxiliary locks such as a pin that penetrates both frame structures shall be installed on casement and double hung windows. d) Windows fitted with a crank type gear opening device shall be fitted with a positive window lock that engages metal to metal. Windows shall not be located within 40 inches of the locking device of any door unless protected by a steel grill with 1/4" minimum diameter bars not more than 2" on center or by a screen with 1/8" diameter wire mesh more than 2" on center mounted on the inside or glazed with 1/4" tempered glass. 9. Garage doors. Vehicle garage doors shall be secured with a metal to metal locking device that prevents the door from being pulled or pried up from the outside. No electric garage door openers shall be permitted that will automatically activate when the door is forced open. Garage doors fitted with automatic openers shall be permited with an alternative form of locking device activated from the interior of the garage. Other garage doors shall comply with all of the provisions of this section. 10. Storage areas. Any exterior storage area attached to a dwelling, apartment or condominium and enclosed by a door shall comply with this section or have a minimum 3/8" diameter hardened padlock hasp. 1/90 SG C, r' • 46.When a common area car wash is provided,no washwater shall discharge to the storm drain system. The car wash area should drain to the sanitary sewer.The area must be covered and designed to prevent excess rainwater from entering the sanitary sewer. Contact the local permitting authority and POTW for specific connection and discharge requirements. If no common car wash area exists, means should be taken to discourage car washing,e.g.,removing hose bibs and installing signs. 47.The applicant shall record CC&R's at the time of filing the final map which shall create a property owners association for the development. The CC&R's shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. Where not covered by a landscape and lighting district,the homeowner's association shall be responsible for implementing all storm water measures and the maintenance of all private streets,private utilities,and other common areas and facilities on the site,including all landscaping. Landscaping shall be designed with efficient irrigation to reduce runoff and promote surface filtration and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides which can contribute to urban runoff pollution. GENERAL DESIGN 48.The developer is responsible for the construction site and construction safety. 49.The minimum width for the private roads with parking on one side shall be 33 feet or as otherwise approved by Director of Public Works. 50.A cul-de-sac or turnaround at or near the end of all dead-end private roads. 51.All public sidewalks must be within City right-of-way or in a pedestrian easement except as specifically approved by the Public Works Director. 52.No special paving or concrete paving will be allowed in public streets. 53.All of the plans,including Improvement and Grading Plans,and subdivision maps,must be designed to the City of Dublin's standards plans and specifications,policies and requirements using standard City title block and format. The grading plan design must based on the approved soil reports. In addition to the civil engineer,a soils engineer must sign the grading plans. The soils engineer or his technical representative must be present at all times during grading. All engineering plans must be designed and signed by a Registered Civil Engineer. Plans are subject to the review and approval of the Director of Public Works,and after his approval,original mylars or photo mylars with three sets of blue prints must be submitted to the City. 54.The minimum uniform street gradient shall be 1%. The structure design of the road shall be subject to approval of the Director of Public Works. Parking lots shall have a minimum gradient of 1%and a maximum gradient of 5%. 55.No cut and fill slopes shall exceed 2:1 unless recommended by the project soils engineer and approved by the Public Works Director. Slopes shall be graded so that there is both horizontal and vertical slope variation where visible from public areas and the top and bottom of slopes shall be rounded in order to create or maintain a natural appearance. 56.All building pad elevations must be above the 100-year flood level. - 6 - Rev: 4/96 • 57.A registered civil or structural engineer shall design all retaining walls over three feet in height(or over two feet in height with a surcharge)and a building permit shall be required for their construction. A maintenance and inspection program shall be implemented by the developer or homeowners'association for the periodic inspection and maintenance of all retaining walls that could possibly affect the public right-of-way. 58.Minimum sight distance for public streets,including intersection sight distance,shall meet the CALTRANS Highway Design Manual. 59.Prior to filing for building permits,precise plans for street improvements,grading,drainage (including size,type and location of drainage facilities both on and off-site)and erosion and sedimentation control shall be submitted and subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Director. 60.The soils report for the project shall include recommendations 1)for foundations,decks,and other miscellaneous structures,2)for design of swimming pools,and 3)for setbacks for structures from top and toes of slopes. Additionally,the soils report shall include a professional opinion as to safety of the site from the hazards of land slippage,erosion,settlement and seismic activity. 61.The Contractor shall be responsible for acquiring permits required by other agencies.(Fish&Game, Army Corps of Engineers,Zone 7,Etc.) EASEMENTS: 62.The Developer shall acquire easements,and/or obtain rights-of-entry from the adjacent property owners for improvements required outside of the subdivision.The easements and/or rights-of-entry shall be in writing and copies shall be furnished to the Public Works Director. EROSION: • 63.Prior to any grading of the site and filing of the Final Map,a detailed construction grading/erosion control plan(including phasing);and a drainage,water quality,and erosion and sedimentation control plan,for the post-construction period,both prepared by the Project Civil Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist;shall be approved by the Public Works Director. Said plans shall include detailed design,location,and maintenance criteria,of all erosion and sediment control measures. The plans shall provide,to the maximum extent practicable,that no increase in sediment or pollutants from the site will occur. The post-construction plan shall provide for long-term maintenance of all permanent erosion and sediment control measures such as slope vegetation. The construction grading/erosion control plan shall be implemented in place by October 15th and shall be maintained in place until April 15th unless otherwise allowed in writing by the City Engineer. It shall be the developer's responsibility to maintain the erosion and sediment control measures for the year following acceptance of the subdivision improvements by the City Council. FINAL MAP: 64.Prior to filing the Final Map,precise plans and specifications for street improvements,grading, drainage(including size,type,and location of drainage facilities both on-and off-site),and erosion and sedimentation control,shall be approved by the Public Works Director. 69 Rev: 4/96 65.Submit three(3)sets of approved blueprints and approved original mylars or photo mylars of improvement plans,grading plans,and recorded Final Map to the City of Dublin Public Works Department. Upon completion of construction,the City's mylar shall be modified to an"as-built" plan(mylar)prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. A declaration by a Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer that all work was done under his supervision and in accordance with recommendations contained in the soils report shall be submitted to the Public Works Department. 66.For storm drains outside the public right-of-way a"Storm Drain Easement"or"Private Storm Drain Easement"shall be dedicated on the final map. 67.Provide an access road and maintenance easement to storm drainage detention facilities and trash racks. 68.A current title report and copies of the recorded deed of all parties having any recorded title interest in the property to be divided,copies.of the deeds and the Final Maps for adjoining properties and easements shall be submitted at the time of the submittal of the final subdivision maps. 69.Existing and proposed access and public utility easements shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Director prior to approval of the Final Map. These easements shall allow for vehicular and utility service access. 70.A 10-foot public utility easement shall be shown on the Final Map along all street frontages,in addition to all other easements required by the utility companies or governmental agencies. 71.All street dedications shall include working easements for slopes maintenance. 72.The boundary of all lots and the exterior boundary of the Subdivision,as well as the centerline of the streets,shall be survey monumented. At least three(3)permanent benchmarks shall be established. Plats and elevation data shall be provided to the City in a form acceptable to the Public Works Director. EIKE: 73.Install fire hydrants at the locations approved by the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority in accordance with the standards in effect at the time of development. A raised blue reflectorized traffic marker shall be epoxied to the center of the paved street opposite each hydrant. 74.All materials and workmanship for fire hydrants,gated connections,and appurtenances thereto, necessary to provide water supply for fire protection,must be installed by the developer and conform to all requirements of the applicable provisions of the Standard Specifications of Dublin San Ramon Services District and Dougherty Regional Fire Authority. All such work will be subject to the joint field inspection of the Public Works Director and Dublin San Ramon Services District. 75.Fire access roads must be designed,constructed,and gated to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director and to the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority. 76.The improvement plans must be approved by the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority,as indicated by their signature on the title sheet. 10 s Rev: 4/96 FLOOD CONTROL: 77.The developer shall comply with Alameda County Flood Control District requirements. 78.In the 100-year Flood Hazard Zone,all residential units shall have their finished floor elevation a minimum of one foot(1') above the 100-year flood level. Commercial buildings shall either provide flood-proofing,or have their finished floor elevation above the 100-year flood level. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: 79.Dedication of land shall be made to the City of Dublin such that it conveys land sufficient for the approved streets'right-of-way. Improvements shall be made,by the applicant,along all streets within the development and as required off-site including curb,gutter,sidewalk,paving,drainage, and work on the existing paving,if necessary,from a structural or grade continuity standpoint. FUTURE CONFORMANCE: 80.The design and improvements of the Subdivision shall be in conformance with the design and improvements indicated graphically,or as modified by the Conditions of Approval. The improvements and design shall include street locations,grades,alignments,and widths,the design of storm drainage facilities inside and outside the Subdivision,grading of lots,the boundaries of the Tract,and shall show compliance with City standards for roadways. GRADING: 81.Grading shall be designed in conformance with the approved tentative map. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the soil report. The grading plan shall conform with the City specifications and ordinances,City policies and the Uniform Building Code(UBC). In case of conflict between the soil engineer's recommendations and City ordinances the City Engineer shall determine which shall apply. 82.Prior to final preparation of the subgrade and placement of base materials,all underground utilities shall be installed and service connections stubbed out to property lines. Public utilities,Cable TV, sanitary sewers,and water lines,shall be installed in a manner which will not disturb the street pavement,curb,gutter and sidewalk,when future service connections or extensions are made. All public and private utilities shall be undergrounded. 83.Grading shall be completed in compliance with the construction grading plans and recommendations of the Project Soils Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist,and the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan,and shall be done under the supervision of the Project Soils Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist,who shall,upon its completion,submit a declaration to the Public Works Director that all work was done in accordance with the recommendations contained in the soils and geologic investigation reports and the approved plans and specifications. Inspections that will satisfy final subdivision map requirements shall be arranged with the Public Works Director. 84.If grading is commenced prior to filing the Final Map,a surety or guarantee shall be filed with the City of Dublin. The surety shall be equal to the amount approved by the City Public Works Director as necessary to insure restoration of the site to a stable and erosion resistant state if the project is terminated prematurely. 9 F ? G' Rev: 4/96 85.Any grading,stockpiling,storing of equipment or material on adjacent properties will require written approval of those property owners affected.Copies of the rights-of-entry shall be furnished to the Public Works Director prior to the start of work. 86.Street grades shall be designed and built in accordance with the General Plan,unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director. 87.The developer shall keep adjoining public streets free and clean of project dirt,mud,materials,and debris. 88.Where soil or geologic conditions encountered in grading operations are different from that anticipated in the soil and geologic investigation report,or where such conditions warrant changes to the recommendations contained in the original soil investigation,a revised soil or geologic report shall be submitted for approved by the Public Works Director. It shall be accompanied by an engineering and geological opinion as to the safety of the site from hazards of land slippage,erosion, settlement,and seismic activity. 89.Landslide and erosive areas outlined in the geotechnical investigation report shall be shown on the improvement/grading plans or plans which are part of improvement/grading plans. The plans shall show the method for repair of these areas as stated in the geotechnical investigation. 90.Grading plans shall indicate the quantity of soil that must be imported or off-hauled. If soil must be imported or off-hauled,the Applicant shall submit details as to how it will be done and routes of travel for the Public Works Director's approval. 91.All unsuitable material found at the site shall be removed from the site or stockpiled for later use in landscape areas. 92.Grading within a designated open space area shall be limited to that grading which is necessary for construction of the roadways traversing the open space and any approved development. 93.All cut and fill slopes shall be revegetated with native shrubs,trees and grasses subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and Public Works Director. A revegetation plan for replanting graded slopes and replacing the amount of woodlands lost due to grading shall be prepared. Enhanced revegetation techniques shall be employed to ensure the success of the revegetation. Examples of enhancements to the revegetation plan include irrigating the young plants,placing top soil on fill slopes,using special planting techniques such as drilling into fill slopes to allow root penetration,and planting at a density similar to the native woodlands in the riparian corridors. 94.All landslides which effect any structures or roads or other improvements shall be maintain by Geologic Hazards Abatement District(GHAD). The developer or homeowners'association are responsible for financing the GHAD. The administration of the GHAD is to be determined at the Final Map stage. 95.The project civil engineer shall certify that the finished graded building pads are within± 0.1 feet in elevation of those shown on approved plans. -72 - 10 - Rev: 4/96 HANDICAPPED ACCESS: 96. Handicapped ramps and parking shall be provided as specified in the American Disability Act (ADA). IMPROVEMENT PLANS. AGREEMENTS. AND SECURITIES: 97. Obtain copies of and comply with conditions as noted on "City of Dublin General Notes on Improvement Plans" and "City of Dublin Improvement Plan Review Check List." 98. All improvements within the public right-of-way, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, driveways, paving, and utilities, must be constructed prior to occupancy and in accordance with approved City Standards and/or Plans. 99. The Applicant/Developer shall enter into an improvement agreement with the City for all improvements. 100.Complete improvement plans, specifications, and calculations shall be submitted to, and be approved by, the Public Works Director and other affected agencies having jurisdiction over public improvements,prior to execution of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. Improvement plans shall show the existing and proposed improvements along adjacent public street(s) and property that relate to the proposed improvements. 101.All required securities, in an amount equal to 100% of the approved estimates of construction costs of improvements, and a labor and material security, equal to 50% of the construction cost, shall be submitted to, and be approved by,the City and affected agencies having jurisdiction over public improvements, prior to execution of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREA: 102.Maintenance of common areas, including ornamental landscaping, graded slopes, erosion control plantings and drainage, erosion and sediment control improvements, shall be the responsibility of the developer during construction stages and until final improvements are accepted by the City Council and the securities are released (one year after improvements are accepted). Thereafter, maintenance shall be the responsibility of a homeowners' association or individual property owners, in accordance with the project CC & Rs. MISCELLANEOUS: 103.Copies of the Final Map and improvement plans, indicating all lots, streets, and drainage facilities within the subdivision shall be submitted at 1" =400' scale, and 1" =200' scale for City mapping purposes. 104.The Developer shall enter into an Improvement Agreement with the City for all public improvements prior to issuance of improvement permit. Complete improvement plans, specifications and calculations shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Public Works Director and other affected agencies having jurisdiction over public improvements prior to execution of the Improvement Agreement. Improvement plans shall show the existing and proposed improvements along the adjacent public street and property that relate to the proposed improvements. 105.The developer shall be responsible for controlling any rodent, mosquito, or other pest problem due- to construction activities. 73 Rev: 4/96 • • 106.All construction traffic and parking may be subject to specific requirements as determined by the Public Works Director. 107.The developer shall defend,indemnify,and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its agents,officers, and employees,from any claim,action,or proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers,or employees,to attack,set aside,void,or annul,an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency,appeal board,or legislative body concerning a subdivision,which action is brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499.37 of the Government Code of the State of California. The City of Dublin shall promptly notify the developer of any claim,action,or proceedings. 108.In submitting subsequent plans for review and approval,each set of plans shall have attached an annotated copy of these conditions of approval. The notations shall clearly indicate how all conditions of approval will be complied with. Construction plans will not be accepted without the annotated conditions attached to each set of plans. The Applicant will be responsible for obtaining the approval of all participating non-City agencies prior to the issuance of building permits. 109.Labor and materials bond will be released by City's following acceptance of improvements. The Performance bond will be released one year after acceptance of improvements and after all defects have been repaired. The Developer,with the approval of the Director of Public Works, has the option of providing a Maintenance Bond after acceptance of improvements by the City in the amount of 25%of improvements costs. This will serve instead of the Faithful Performance Bond. Prior to release of the Faithful Performance Bond or the Maintenance Bond,all improvements and landscaping shall be installed and established per approved plans. PERMIT: 110.Applicant shall obtain Caltrans'approval and permit for any work performed within their right-of- way or impacting their facilities. 111.An encroachment permit shall be secured from the Public Works Director for any work done within the public right-of-way where this work is not covered under the improvement plans. 112.The developer and/or their representatives shall secure all necessary permits for work including,but not limited to,grading,encroachment,Fish and Game Department,County Flood Control District, Corps.of Engineers and State water quality permits and show proof of it to the City of Dublin, Department of Public Works. 113.Prior to issuance of the grading permit,visually important trees shall be tagged in the field. After the staking of the daylight lines but prior to the start of grading,protective fencing shall be installed around the trees,subject to approval of the Public Works Director. NOISF.: 114.Construction and grading operations,including the maintenance and warming of equipment,shall be limited to weekdays,Monday through Friday,and non-City holidays,between the hours fof 7:30 a.m. � 1r - 12 - Rev: 4/96 and 5:30 p.m. The Director of Public Works may approve days and hours beyond the above mentioned days and hours. The developer is responsible for the additional cost of the Public Works inspectors'overtime. 115.During the construction,noise control and construction traffic mitigation measures within residential neighborhoods or on public streets must be taken to reduce noise and use of public streets by construction traffic as directed by Public Works officials. PARKLAND DEDICATION: 116.Park land shall be dedicated or in-lieu fees shall be paid,or a combination of both shall be provided prior to issuance of building permits or prior to recordation of the Final Map,whichever occurs first, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance. STREETS: 117.The street surfacing shall be asphalt concrete paving. The Public Works Director/City Engineer shall review the project's Soils Engineer's structural pavement design. The developer shall,at his sole expense,make tests of the soil over which the surfacing and base are to be constructed and furnish the test reports to the Public Works Director/City Engineer. The Developer's soils engineer shall determine a preliminary structural design of the road bed. After rough grading has been completed,the developer shall have soil tests performed to determine the final design of the road bed. In lieu of these soil tests,the road may be designed and constructed based on an R-value of 5 STREET LIGHTS: 118.Street light standards and luminaries shall be designed and installed per approval of the Director of Public Works. The maximum voltage drop for street lights is 5%. 119.Properties shall be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District. STREET SIGNS: 120.The developer shall furnish and install street name signs,bearing such names as are approved by the Planning Director,and traffic safety signs in accordance with the standards of the City of Dublin. Addresses shall be assigned by the City Building Official. 121.Street names shall be submitted and processed through the Planning Department and shall be indicated on the Final Map. 122.The Developer shall furnish and install street name signs,in accordance with the standards of the City of Dublin,bearing such names as are approved by the City. The developer shall furnish and install traffic safety signs in accordance with the standards of the City of Dublin. • - 13 Rev, 4/96 • STREET TREES: 123.Street trees,of at least a 15-gallon size,shall be planted along the street frontages. Trees shall be planted in accordance with a planting plan,including tree varieties and locations,approved by the Planning Director and Director of Public Works. Trees planted within,or adjacent to,sidewalks or curbs shall be provided with root shields. TRAFFIC: 124.The City of Dublin is currently studying the adoption and implementation of a regional traffic impact fee for roadway and street improvements in the Tri-Valley area. This fee will provide for Public Works projects to improve traffic circulation for accommodating new development within the City. If a regional traffic impact fee ordinance is approved and enacted prior to issuance of any building permits,the Applicant shall pay its fair share of this regional traffic impact fee. UTILITIES: 125.Electrical,gas,telephone,and Cable TV services,shall be provided underground to each lot in accordance with the City policies and existing ordinances. All utilities shall be located and provided within public utility easements and sized to meet utility company standards. All utilities to and within the project shall be undergrounded. 126.Prior to the filing of the Final Map,the developer shall furnish the Public Works Director/City Engineer with a letter from Dublin San Ramon Services District(DSRSD)stating that the District has agreed to furnish water and sewer service to each of the dwelling units and/or lot included on the Final Map of the subdivision. 127.The Dublin San Ramon Services District shall review and approve the improvement plans as evidenced by their representative's signature on the Title Sheet. 128.Any relocation of improvements or public facilities shall be accomplished by the developer and at no expense to the City. WATER: 129.Water facilities must be connected to the DSRSD system,and must be installed at the expense of the developer,in accordance with District standards and specifications. All material and workmanship for water mains,and appurtenances thereto,must conform with all of the requirements of the officially adopted Water Code of the District and will be subject to field inspection by the District. 130.Any water well,cathodic protection well,or exploratory boring shown on the map,that is know to exist,is proposed,or is located during the course of field operations,must be properly abandoned, backfilled,or maintained in accordance with applicable groundwater protection ordinances. For additional information contact Flood control,Zone 7. 131.Developer shall design,incorporate,and institute water conservation measures for the entire project. Refer to"Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance#18-92." r7e _ 14 _ ... .. _.,..._ Rev: 4/96 132.Developer shall design and provide infrastructure for recycled water use for landscaping in accordance with DSRSD and to the satisfaction of the Public Work Director. 133.Developer shall design and construct the water and sewer system in accordance with the DSRSD requirements. • ZONINCI: 134.Comply with all zoning provisions,including Zoning Ordinance and rezoning Conditions of Approval. TIM/gencoa • i� 15 - Rev: 4/96 Co Co Y c., ',-mac It " Un ® o 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program ' • < = Trumark Homes General Plan Amendment Application PA-95-029 M 0 Revised April 16. 1996 The following mitigation monitoring and reporting program is intended to comply with applicable sections of the California Environmental Quality Act,as amended. Responsible Time Frame Mitigation Measure Agency/Organ for Verification/ ization Completion Date zimlMitigation Measure 1 The project developer shall prepare an Dublin Public Prior to issuance erosion and sedimentation control plan implementation throughout Works of grading project construction.The plan should be prepared in accordance with Department permits City of Dublin and Regional Water Quality Control Board design standards.The Plan,at a minimum,should include the following: a)All disturbed areas should be immediately revegetated or otherwise protected from both wind and water erosion upon completion of grading operations; b)Stormwater run-off should be collected into stable drainage channels from small drainage basins to prevent the build up of large,potentially erosive stormwater flows; c)Runoff should be directed away from all areas disturbed by construction; d)Specific measures to control erosion from stockpiled earth materials; ( e)Sediment ponds or siltation basins should be used to trap eroded v 1 soils prior to discharge into off-site drainage culverts or channels; f)Major site development work involving excavation and earth moving for construction during the dry season,except as may be approved by the City Engineer. Mitigation Measure 2:The project developer shall obtain any Dublin Public Prior to issuance required permits from the California Department of Fish and Game Works of grading prior to discharge of water into Alamo Creek. permits Mitigation Measure 3:The applicant shall obtain an NPDES Dublin Public Prior to issuance general construction permit from the State Water Resources Control Works of grading Board.The terms of this permit require that project development not Department permits cause any increase in sedimentation,turbidity or hazardous materials within downstream receiving waters. I ^, Dublin Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring Plan page 2 Trumark Homes GPA Revised April16,1996 PA-95-029 Mitigation Measure 4.The following measures shall be Dublin Public Prior to issuance incorporated into construction specifications and shall be followed by Works of grading the project grading contractor: Department permits a)All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust.Watering shall occur at least twice per day with complete coverage,preferably in the late morning and at the completion of work for the day; b)All clearing,grading,earthmoving and excavation shall cease during periods of winds greater than 20 mph over one hour; c)All material transported off-site shall either be sufficiently watered or securely fastened to prevent escape of dust and debris; d)All inactive portions of the construction shall be planted and watered,if construction is accomplished in more than one phase; e)On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 mph; f)During rough grading and construction,Dougherty Road and Sierra Court(if used for construction access)shall be swept at least once per day,or as required by the City of Dublin,to remove silt and construction debris; g)Unnecessary idling of construction shall be avoided; h)Equipment engines shall be maintained in proper working condition per manufactures'specifications; i)During periods of heavier air pollution(May through October),the construction period shall be lengthened to minimize the number of equipment operating at one time. Mitigation Measure 5:The project developer shall be responsible Dublin Public Prior to final for installing frontage improvements on Dougherty Road to upgrade Works building permit the pavement condition,provide a north-bound left-turn lane,a Department inspection southbound right-turn deceleration lane and funding a"fair share" portion of the cost of future intersection signalization.Necessary Traffic Improvement Fees shall also be paid to the City. Dublin Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring Plan page 3 Trumark Homes GPA Revised Apri[16,1996 PA-95-029 Mitigation Measure 6:If the relocation of Camp Parks main Dublin Public Prior to final entrance occurs after the construction of the Scarlett Drive extension or Works building this proposed project,left turns from the proposed project and/or Department inspection Camp Parks shall be prohibited. Mitigation Measure 7:The final design of the site access off of Dublin Public As part of public Dougherty Road and the driveway into the project from the access Works improvement road shall be approved by the Dublin City Engineer.The overall Department plans design shall be consistent with City plans for the relocation or extension of Scarlett Drive. Mitigation Measure 8.The final design of the project shall meet all Dublin Public As part of Dublin Public Works Department,Police Department and Fire Works,Police Tentative Tract Authority policies and standards for internal street widths and corner and Fire Map radii. Authority Mitigation Measure 9:If one or both of the site access points are Dublin Public Prior to issuance gated or other vehicular restrictions installed,the project developer Works and of building shall obtain the approval of the Dublin Police Department and Police permits Dougherty Regional Fire Authority to ensure that passage by Departments and emergency vehicles through this access will not be hindered.Gating of Fire Authority any of the access points shall also be approved by the City of Dublin Public Works Department to ensure that adequate vehicular access can be provided in a safe manner in terms of vehicle stacking,blockage of sidewalks and other factors. In addition to providing one main access and one secondary access, the project developer should provide one additional emergency vehicle access point at the westerly end of the project,with the design and location to be approved by the Dublin City Engineer and Zone 7,if the "c3 Zone 7 maintenance road is used for emergency access purposes. Dublin Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring Plan page 4 Trumark Homes GPA Revised April 16,1996 PA-95-029 Mitigation Measure 10:The project developer shall install safety Dublin Public As part of public rails on both sides of the existing pedestrian bridge over Alamo Creek Works works to the satisfaction of the Dublin City Engineer. Department improvements Mitigation Measure 11. The project developer shall: Dublin Public 1)Prior to Works and issuance of (1) Prior to issuance of building permits,have a signed Building building permits; agreement with the DSRSD agreeing to upgrade the water Departments, 2)Prior to treatment method of Turnout 1 which will eliminate gaseous Fire Authority occupancy of chlorine from the site and replace it with a system compatible, and DSRSD dwelling units from a safety perspective,with adjacent residential uses. (2) Prior to occupancy of residences,all necessary treatment upgrades for Turnout 1 shall be installed.This may include providing adequate truck access from the project site to Turnout 1 for delivery of supplies and/or other improvements.All such improvements shall be done to the satisfaction of the DSRSD,Fire Authority and Dublin City Engineer. Mitigation Measure 12:A minimum setback of 50 feet shall be Dublin Planning Site established and maintained from the petroleum pipeline and any Department Development habitable structure on the project site. Review Mitigation Measure 13:A subsurface investigation,including Dublin Building Prior to issuance recovery of soil and ground water samples,should be undertaken to Department of building address potential impacts from the adjacent petroleum pipeline and permits former rail transfer facility. Dublin Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring Plan page 5 Trumark Homes GPA Revised April 16,1996 PA-95-029 Mitigation Measure 14:The property should be monitored by an Dublin Public During environmental professional during demolition and pregrading activities Works construction to observe areas which may have been obscured by remnant Department phases structures,paving or fill material.Recommendations of the environmental professional shall be followed during site grading and construction. Mitigation Measure 15:Permanent irrigation systems and Dublin Planning Prior to final automatic controllers shall be installed within all landscaped planter Department building areas to assist in reducing the danger from grass fires. inspection Mitigation Measure 16:All construction activities on the project Dublin Building During site shall be limited to 7 a.m.to 5 p.m.,Monday through Friday, and Public construction unless alternative arrangements are approved by the Dublin Building Works phases Official for structural construction and the City Engineer for grading Departments activities.Construction equipment,including compressors, generators,and mobile equipment,shall be fitted with heavy duty mufflers designed to reduce noise impact. Dublin Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring Plan page 6 Trumark Homes GPA Revised April 16,1996 PA-95-029 Mitigation Measure 17a:To mitigate exterior noise levels,an Dublin Building Prior to final acoustically-effective barrier shall be constructed generally along the Department building permit property line of the site contiguous with Dougherty Road and along inspection of the southerly property line,as shown on Exhibit 5 in the Initial Study. 1st production Barrier heights shall range from 6 to 12 feet in height with the final unit. heights of the barriers determined by an acoustical engineer based on the final grading plan.The barrier must be air tight,without cracks, gaps or other openings,and may be constructed of concrete,stucco, masonry,earthen berm or equivalent material.The barriers under 10 feet high must have a minimum surface weight of 2.5 pounds per sq. ft.and barriers over 10 feet shall have a minimum surface weight of 3.0 pounds per square foot. Mitigation Measure 17b:Appropriate wording,as approved by Dublin Planning Prior to approval the Dublin Planning Department,shall be submitted to the State Department of final Department of Real Estate to be included on the final white report subdivision map (sales disclosure document)provided to buyers that industrial users exist immediately south of the subdivision and loud noises may be generated during early morning and late evening hours related to industrial operations.Such wording shall also be included with the project Conditions,Covenants,and Restrictions(C,C&R's)to notify future resale buyers of the noise condition. Dublin Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring Plan page 7 Trumark Homes GPA Revised April 16,1996 PA-95-029 Mitigation Measure 18:To mitigate interior noise levels,the Dublin Building Prior to issuance following window controls shall be provided as noted: Department of building permits a)Maintain closed at all times all windows of second floor and unshielded first floor living spaces of dwellings located within 150 feet of the centerline of Dougherty with a direct or side view of the roadway.These windows shall be rated with a minimum Sound Transmission Class(STC)28.Alternatively,such windows may be kept open up to 50%of the time for natural ventilation, however,they must be fitted with window assemblies rated minimum STC 39; b)Maintain closed at all times all windows of second floor and unshielded first floor living spaces of houses located between 160 feet and 225 feet of the south property line and which also have a direct or side view of industrial uses.These windows shall be rated minimum STC 22.Alternatively,these windows may be kept open up to 50%of the time for natural ventilation,however,they must be fitted with window assemblies rated minimum STC 28; c)Uniform Building and Mechanical Codes for ventilation of habitable structures shall be complied with. Mitigation Measure 19:The applicant shall enter into a written Dublin Building Prior to issuance agreement with the Dublin Unified School District which requires the Department of building payment of mitigation fees as prescribed by the Facilities Master Plan permits of$2.66 per square foot of habitable space,to be adjusted to$3.28 per square foot should the District annex additional territory,along with inflation adjustment permitted by law.The agreed upon fee shall be that in effect at time building permits are obtained.Such fees shall be paid no later than the issuance of building permits. t cn Dublin Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring Plan page 8 Trumark Homes GPA Revised April 16,1996 PA-95-029 Mitigation Measure 20:The applicant shall pay a per-unit Public Dublin Building Prior to issuance Facility Fee prior to issuance of building permit,if such fee program is Department of building adopted by the City Council. permits Mitigation Measure 21:The design of the proposed project shall Dublin Planning Site incorporate the following features: Department Development Plan • The 12-foot wall along the southerly property line shall be "softened"with the planting of permanent vines on both sides of the wall and trees on the residential side of the wall. • The 8-foot wall along Dougherty shall be constructed of decorative block material,shall be setback an average distance of eight feet from the property line with a minimum distance of five feet and shall be"softened"by appropriate landscape material,including trees,shrubs and vines and use of turfed berms. • Specific planter widths and planter details for noise barrier walls shall be shown on landscape plans for the project, which will be reviewed and approved by the City at Site Development Plan Review. Mitigation Measure 22:Should archeological artifacts or remains Dublin Public During grading be discovered during construction of the project,work in the vicinity Works activities of the fmd shall stop immediately until a qualified archeologist can Department evaluate the site and determine the significance of the fmd.Project personnel shall not collect or alter cultural resources.Identified cultural resources shall be recorded on forms DPR 422(archeological sites) and/or DPR 523(historic resources).If human remains are found,the County Coroner shall be contacted immediately. • Dublin Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring Plan page 9 Trumark Homes GPA Revised April 16,1996 PA-95-029 Mitigation Measure 23:The applicant shall work with City of Dublin Planning During Site Dublin with input from the East Bay Regional Parks District and and Public Development Alameda County Public Works Department,through the Site Works Review Development Review process,with regard to treatment of the Department proposed project adjacent to the Iron Horse Trail,including number and location of access points,wall treatment and landscaping. The applicant shall also dedicate to the City of Dublin and improve additional right-of-way for recreational purposes,generally located on the northwest corner of the site.This dedication will complete public ownership of the Iron Horse Trail in this portion of the City. Dublin Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring Plan page 10 Trumark Homes GPA Revised April 16,1996 PA-95-029 CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 4, 1996 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff „ 0C/ PREPARED BY: Carol R.Cirelli,Senior Planner SUBJECT: Eastern Dublin Grazing Management Plan and Wildfire Management Plan • RECOMMENDATION: 1) Hear staff presentation 2) Take testimony from the public 3) Question staff and the public 4) Deliberate 51 Adopt draft Resolution Exhibit C recommending City Council adoption of the Grazing Management Plan for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area and City of Dublin Wildfire Management Plan;or give staff direction and continue the matter. GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: As the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan EIR requires,the City has completed a Grazing Management Plan and Wildfire Management Plan that will promote the protection of riparian and wetland areas and reduce the risk of open land wildfire while protecting wildlife habitat and other open space values. LOCATION: Wildfire Management Plan-Citywide Grazing Management Plan-Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area BACKGROUND; The Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan and companion EIR requires the City to prepare and adopt certain implementation plans and programs before Eastern Dublin development occurs. The City has completed two of these plans: the Grazing Management Plan for the Eastern Dublin General !"an Amendment Area(Exhibit A),and the City of Dublin Wildfire Management Plan(Exhibit B(. The City hired the biological consulting firm of Sycamore Associates to prepare the Grazing Management Plan,and the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority prepared the City of Dublin Wildfire Management Plan with biological consulting assistance from Sycamore Associates. Item No. r i Copies To: Project File Admin.File Senior Planner OF01 g:\eastdu bl\stream\6-4pcsr\crc ANALYSIS: GRAZING MANAGEMENT PLAN Mitigation Measure 3.7/4 of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan EIR requires the City to prepare and adopt a Grazing Management Plan that promotes the protection of riparian and wetland areas,increased plant diversity,and the recovery of native plants,in particular,perennial grasses (see Attachment 1). The primary intent of the Grazing Management Plan for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area(GMP)is to ensure that significant riparian and wetland resources of Tassajara Creek and its major tributaries within the Eastern Dublin area are protected and enhanced,while allowing grazing to continue on properties along the creek and tributaries,consistent with the Specific Plan. Cattle and horses grazing along Tassajara Creek and its major tributaries have reduced and degraded native habitat The GMP contains grazing management guidelines and suggested improvements that when implemented, would reduce grazing impacts on native riparian and wetland areas. This GMP complements another Eastern Dublin implementation measure,the Eastern Dublin Comprehensive Stream Restoration Program,which is currently being prepared. The GMP includes grazing management goals that cover the following general areas of resource protection: riparian area protection,protection of sensitive species,recovery of native plant cover,fire hazard management,prevention of soil erosion or degradation of soil resources, water quality protection, and wildlife protection from rodenticide impacts. The GMP also includes the following management measures that can be implemented to achieve these goals: grazing,water source development,fencing, integrated pest management,and/or habitat protection and restoration. The GMP identifies the following selected improvements that would reduce impacts to riparian resources and sensitive resources: 11 The development of alternate watering sources,salt blocks and nutrient dispensers strategically placed in upland,dry locations to greatly reduce the movement of cattle and horses into the riparian corridors along Tassajara Creek, major tributaries and springs and seeps; 2) Limited areas of exclusionary fencing to protect sensitive species around springs and seeps and the arroyo willow riparian woodland area along Fallon Road. The GMP emphasizes that these riparian protection and restoration measures are practical and cost effective while providing the means to protect sensitive environmental resources. Future grazing within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area will be restricted to those areas zoned Open Space and Rural Residential/Agriculture. The City will enforce the GMP as conditions of rezone and tentative map approval for areas zoned Open Space and Rural Residential/Agriculture. In situations where landowners are not applying for a rezone or tentative map,or have received rezone and tentative map approvals but wish to continue grazing their lands until development begins,the City would seek a cooperative and voluntary approach and would ask the land owners and lessees to voluntarily enter into an agreement to adopt measures consistent with the grazing plan. The GMP suggests how landowners/ranchers can either voluntarily join a cooperative watershed management group to devise a strategy or plan for complying with the GMP lthe City would facilitate the formation of this group),or work independently. The document also suggests some technical and funding assistance. 2 The GMP also requires the City to monitor the progress of the grazing plan,i.e.conduct annual site checks to determine whether watering troughs have been developed and are functionally maintained, exclusionary fencing is being adequately maintained,etc. The GMP also suggests that the City develop a working agreement with various agencies and consultants that have sensitive habitat maintenance expertise to monitor the condition of vegetation within the riparian buffer along Tassajara Creek,its tributaries and other wetland areas that are being grazed. WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN • Mitigation Measure 3.4/12.0 of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan EIR requires the City,in consultation with the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority(DRFA)and a qualified wildlife biologist,to prepare a wildfire management plan for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment project area. The'DRFA,in consultation with Sycamore Associates(biology consultants),prepared the draft City of Dublin Wildfire Management Plan(WMP),see Exhibit B. The intent of the WMP is to reduce the public safety risk of open land wildfire within the City of Dublin to the lowest practical level while reasonably protecting wildlife habitat and other open space values. The WMP addresses all eight bullets of Mitigation Measure 3.4/12.0(see Attachment 1.) The WMP shall be applicable to all future developments throughout the City,not just Eastern Dublin. When the WMP is implemented,a fire safety barrier will be established between the areas of human occupancy and open space. This barrier will reduce the risk of open land wildfire with reasonable protection of wildlife habitat and other open space values. Vegetation and habitat will only change as a result of natural forces or other actions,since this WMP does not impose requirements directly into open space. The wildfire mitigation measures are outlined in the construction requirements and vegetation reduction sections. The WMP sets forth the process for determining who will own,use and maintain the open space. The selection or formation of an entity responsible for the maintenance of open lands will be subject to the Fire Chief's approval and the City Council's final approval. Selection of a maintenance entity, financial obligations of the property owners and plan implementation responsibilities are outlined in the "Ownership and Financing of Maintenance for Open Space"section of the WMP. The document includes vegetation establishment and maintenance guidelines for open lands that are to be removed from grazing use. These guidelines promote the removal of combustible materials and landscaping of fire resistant qualities. The document also includes a list of plant species and areas of plant use. Finally,the WMP includes monitoring measures. All areas adjacent to open space or undeveloped lands shall be inspected in accordance with the Fire Department's Nuisance Abatement Program. Also, any new grading,building or other activity that affects open space will be reevaluated. This WMP also satisfies the following requirements of Mitigation Measure 3.4/9.0: 1)use of non- combustible roof materials in all new construction;and 21 establish buffer zone behind homes that are contiguous with the wildland area,which is to be landscaped with irrigated(wet banding)or equivalent fire-resistive vegetation. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Grazing Management Plan and the Wildfire Management Plan,as specified in the Draft Resolution, Exhibit C. Both documents satisfy the requirements of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan and EIR. • 3 PACE 3 OF ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Grazing Management Plan for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area Exhibit B: City of Dublin Wildfire Management Plan Exhibit C: Resolution Recommending City Council Approval of Exhibits A and B Background Attachments: Attachment 1 : Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Final EIR Mitigation Measures g:\eastdubl\stream\pcsr\crc • • GRAZING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AREA CITY OF DUBLIN March 1996 Prepared by: Sycamore Associates LLC 910 Mountain View Drive Lafayette, CA 94549 EXHIBIT A ±'AGE 5 of W GRAZING MANAGEMENT PLAN Summary The preparation of this grazing management plan was required by Mitigation Measure 3.7/4.0 of the EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan,which states,"Grazing management plans shall be developed by the City and implemented soon after approval of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. Management plans shall favor protection of riparian and wetland areas,increased plant diversity,and the recovery of native plants,in particular,perennial grasses." Cattle and horses grazing along Tassajara Creek and major tributaries have reduced and degraded native habitat.Cattle and horse impacts to riparian resources and sensitive resources found at seeps and springs noted on Figures 3.7-A and 3.7-C of the EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan(attached)can be reduced through the implementation of selected improvements.Those improvements include: • The development of alternate watering sources,salt blocks and nutrient dispensers strategically placed in upland,dry locations to greatly reduce the movement of cattle and horses into the riparian corridors along Tassajara Creek,major tributaries and springs and seeps; • Limited areas of exclusionary fencing to protect sensitive species around springs and seeps and the arroyo willow riparian woodland area along Fallon Road. Implementation of these measures will be negotiated through voluntary short-term agreements between the City of Dublin and landowners for those lands which will be rezoned and developed in the future.The provisions of the grazing management plan will be conditions for approval of rezones within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area,excluding the future study area(GPA)and will apply to those lands which will be zoned rural residential/agriculture or open space in the future. Introduction This grazing management plan was prepared concurrent with the Tassajara Creek Comprehensive Stream Restoration Program(Sycamore Associates, 1996)to fulfill the requirements of the EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan.The primary intent of this document is to ensure that significant riparian and wetland resources of Tassajara Creek and major tributaries in the GPA area are protected and enhanced,while allowing grazing to continue on properties along the creek and tributaries,consistent with the Specific Plan.This document is prepared with the understanding that cattle and horses have grazed this region and watered in the Tassajara Creek corridor for many decades,and that any efforts to integrate riparian protection and restoration must be done with the rancher's cooperation and land management expertise. Riparian protection and restoration measures must be practical and cost-effective while providing the means to protect sensitive environmental resources. 1 V( The preparation of this grazing management plan was required by the EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan.Its authority springs from the following element of the EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan and from policies of the Specific Plan that describe the City's intention to protect and enhance riparian resources. Mitigation Measure 3.7/4.0 of the EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment (GPA)and Specific Plan states,"Grazing management plans shall be developed by the City and implemented soon after approval of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan.Management plans shall favor protection of riparian and wetland areas,increased plant diversity,and the recovery of native plants,in particular,perennial grasses." The purpose of this grazing management plan is twofold: • To ensure compliance with the EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan which called for the preparation of grazing management plans; • To provide land management recommendations to protect and enhance riparian and wetland resources,water quality and the habitats of sensitive plant and wildlife species. This grazing management plan is based upon information in the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan and EIR,other documents cited in the references and personal communication with agency representatives and local ranchers. Cattle and horses enter creeks to drink water,therefore development of alternate watering sites are a focus of this grazing management plan.Protection of sensitive biological resources and enhancement of riparian resources along Tassajara Creek,major tributaries and springs and seeps in the GPA area should be accomplished through: • The development of alternate watering sources,salt blocks and nutrient dispensers strategically placed in upland,dry locations to greatly reduce the movement of cattle and horses into the riparian corridors along Tassajara Creek,major tributaries and springs and seeps; • Limited areas of exclusionary fencing to protect sensitive species around springs and seeps and the arroyo willow riparian woodland area along Fallon Road. Cooperative and voluntary protection of riparian and wetland resources are the basis of this grazing management plan.It is viewed as preferable to a regulated approach which would mandate costly protection measures,such as extensive fencing of the entire creek. Landowners and grazing lessees have the greatest familiarity with the lands and resources, the feasibility and the practical consequences of alternative practices.The motivation for this approach is underscored by Program 6H of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan(page 67)which directs the City of Dublin to enact and enforce an erosion and sedimentation control ordinance to protect water quality and protection of stream channels.Successful implementation of the lower cost measures described herein to discourage cattle and horse use of sensitive biological resource areas, Tassajara Creek,and major tributaries would reduce the need for provisions in the soil 2 7 (-IV t control ordinance focusing on cattle and horse impacts to water erosion and sedimen swales devoid of quality and soil erosion. rassy For the purpose s The major tributaries major tributaries are defined as tributaries that support u ose of this document,minor tributaries are define as vegetation,and to ponds,seeps or spring shrub and tree veg roximitY 3.7-A and shrubs and trees or are inmanagement plan are shown C,p tAand Specific Plan.-C oft e addressed inthis gr D b endment( ) EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Am This grazing management plan does not address in detail technical range management issues nsuch capacity focus duals g matterry in stead on thenmeans to protect the creek andtrol of exotic plats,ranglwetlandt or grazing P h' resources. Area Covered by Grazing Plan This grazing plan covers all areas within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area,excluding the future study area(hereinafter referred to as the GPA)that are currently being grazed or will be grazed by domestic livestock in the future.Lands located outside the City limits shall not be subject to this grazing plan. Grazing has been a traditional land use throughout the region for decades.However,as development in the Eastern Dublin GPA area proceeds,lands that currently support cattle and horses will be converted to the land uses described on Figure 2B(Land Use Map, Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan)of the Specific Plan. As described in the Specific Plan,future grazing within the Eastern Dublin GPA area will be restricted to those areas zoned rural residential/agriculture or open space. Rural Residential/agricultural Zone Lands which will ultimately be zoned rural residential/agriculture within the Eastern Dublin GPA area are in two disconnected areas which are not immediately adjacent to Tassajara Creek.The smaller area would generate only a small amount of forage for cattle or horses,supporting only a very limited herd year round,or a larger herd for a short period of time.This small area is surrounded by land zoned medium density and community park and is bounded on the west by Tassajara Road.When the park is developed the boundary between it and the rural residential/agriculture land should be fenced to prevent the movement of cattle or horses into park facilities.Once fenced, livestock will be unable to move out of the area into Tassajara Creek or sensitive resources along tributaries.The larger area that is zoned rural residential/agriculture,while not adjacent to Tassajara Creek is bisected by tributaries to Tassajara Creek,one of which supports red-legged frog at the location mapped on Figures 3.7-A and 3.7-C(Habitat and Sensitive Species,EIR for Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan).Movement of cattle or horses from this area to the creek will be prevented by fencing along Fallon Road and fencing around residential development to the south. 3 g 'I Open Space Zone For the purposes of this grazing plan,all lands to be zoned open space within the Eastern Dublin GPA area in the future are divided into five areas,featured as OS 1 through 5 on the attached Figure 2B.The accessibility of these areas to Tassajara Creek,riparian resources along major tributaries,and seeps and springs is described below.The grazing management guidelines in this grazing plan were developed to reduce impacts of cattle and horses on riparian resources along Tassajara Creek,major tributaries,and sensitive species at seeps and springs within the areas designated as OS 1 through 5. OS 1 Livestock will be contained within OS 1,unable to move to Tassajara Creek if the boundary with Camp Parks to the west is fenced and if fencing or other development barriers occur at the northern boundary of OS 1. OS 2 and 3 These properties occur in narrow bands along Tassajara Creek.If livestock grazing in these areas occurs in the future,livestock would have to be concentrated along the creek because access to upland areas would be blocked by development and fencing along the Camp Parks boundary. OS 4 Movement of livestock from OS 4 into Tassajara Creek will be blocked by fencing along Tassajara Creek Road.Sensitive resources at seeps and springs along the major tributary to Tassajara Creek do not occur within this property. OS 5 Fallon Road crosses a major tributary that occurs within this area.While development will surround this area, arroyo willow riparian woodland does occur along the margins of the tributary. Phased Implementation of the Grazing Management Plan Grazing may continue within the Eastern Dublin GPA until the landowner receives a zone change approval,tentative map approval and grading permit consistent with land uses noted on Figure 2B of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan. Compliance with this grazing management plan will be made a condition of rezone or tentative map approval. After approval of zoning changes,grazing will be restricted to those more limited areas which will be zoned rural residential/agriculture or open space. Implementation of this grazing management plan should begin upon acceptance by the City of Dublin for all areas currently being grazed within the Eastern Dublin GPA area. Discussions with landowners should be held to discuss this grazing management plan and to determine the need or desirability of a cooperative watershed management group to expedite these improvements. The cost of developing alternate watering sources(specified in this management plan)and extensive exclusionary fencing(not specified in this management plan)can be very high, and in the case of landowners who do not anticipate continuing grazing in the future,such improvements may be infeasible.In addition,if grazing is to be phased out with 4 � �� • development,grazing-related impacts will be reduced and implementation of new grazing management measures may not be necessary. The City of Dublin should anticipate negotiating voluntary agreements with individual landowners in these situations to ensure that grazing impacts to riparian resources,and sensitive resources at springs and seeps do not continue beyond an agreed upon period of time.Guidelines 1-2,and 4-9 from the "Grazing Management Guidelines"section below should be implemented as soon as possible.Guideline 3,which will restrict access of open space-zoned lands along Tassajara Creek to cattle,should be implemented concurrent with development of the northern portion of the Eastern Dublin GPA area. Ultimately,the elements of the grazing management plan will be focused on the properties zoned rural residential/agriculture and open space noted on Figure 2B Land Use Map of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan.Alternate watering sources and limited exclusionary fencing to protect Tassajara Creek,major tributaries,and seeps and springs will be required only if cattle or horses are being grazed on those lands. Grazing Management Goals The goals are guided by EIR Mitigation Measure 3.7/4.0 for the protection and enhancement of native biological resources.Goals cover the following general areas of resource protection:riparian area protection,protection of sensitive species,recovery of native plant cover,fire hazard management,prevention of soil erosion or degradation of soil resources,water quality protection,and wildlife protection from rodenticide impacts. Management measures used to achieve these goals can include grazing,water source development,fencing,integrated pest management, and/or habitat protection and restoration. Grazing shall be conducted consistent with the goals described below. Grazing Management Goal 1 :Riparian habitat along Tassajara Creek and major tributaries will be protected from excessive grazing in the future.Livestock impacts on riparian vegetation, water quality and soil erosion will be reduced from current levels.. Grazing Management Goal 2:Adverse impacts from grazing to habitats or populations of sensitive wildlife and plant species including known occurrences and potential habitat for the red-legged frog will be minimized in the future. Grazing Management Goal 3 :Fire hazards may be managed through the appropriately timed rotation of domestic livestock which will consume vegetative material likely to develop into significant fire hazards. Grazing Management Goal 4:Soil erosion within the Tassajara Creek corridor,major tributaries and seeps and springs will not be exacerbated by cattle and horse grazing in the future. Grazing Management Goal 5:Adverse impacts to water quality in the Tassajara Creek corridor,major tributaries,seeps and springs associated with cattle and horse grazing will be reduced in the future. Grazing Management Goal 6:Native plant cover,including perennial grasses and native plant diversity in riparian and wetland areas will be protected from excessive grazing through the development of alternate watering sources in upland locations away from known occurrences of sensitive plant species. Grazing_Management Goal 7:Local wildlife will not suffer adverse impacts from the use of rodenticides used in ranching operations to control ground squirrels. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES City of Dublin Role The City of Dublin will be responsible for enforcing implementation of this grazing plan. Landowners shall be required to comply with this grazing plan as conditions of rezone or tentative map approval.The City has no control over lessees except through the property owners.In cases where property owners are not applying for rezone or tentative map approvals,the City would ask the property owners and lessees to voluntarily enter into an agreement to adopt measures consistent with this grazing plan.The City of Dublin should initiate discussions with landowners and grazing lessees watering cattle or horses along Tassajara Creek or major tributaries to review this grazing plan with the goal of developing alternate watering sources and exclusionary fencing. Should landowners wish to pursue a cooperative watershed management group,the City of Dublin should take a leadership role in the formation and management of the group, working with landowners and grazing lessees,East Bay Regional Parks District,Alameda County Resource Conservation District,and the Farm Services Agency. The City of Dublin will be able to enforce the provisions of this grazing management plan during review of applications for rezone and tentative map applications.Applications could be denied if not in compliance with the grazing management plan. The City of Dublin should work with Camp Parks staff to ensure that the fences along the Camp Parks border that abuts the Eastern Dublin GPA area are maintained to keep livestock within Camp Parks boundaries. Monitoring of this grazing plan by the City of Dublin will be required,and is described below in the section on Monitoring and Evaluation Standards. 6 /1 1`f Landowner Responsibilities:Cooperative Watershed Management Group and/or Individual Landowner Implementation Landowners who graze livestock within the Eastern Dublin GPA area will be responsible as conditions of project approval for implementing the measures described herein to protect riparian resources and seeps and springs.Should landowners wish to secure assistance developing alternate watering sources,a cooperative watershed management group among ranchers,grazing lessees,the City of Dublin,East Bay Regional Parks District,Alameda County Resource Conservation District,and the Farm Services Agency should be instituted.City of Dublin staff would facilitate formation of the group and lead meetings.Alternatively,should landowners who graze cattle and horses on lands adjacent to Tassajara Creek,major tributaries or seeps and springs prefer to independently develop alternate water sources and protect sensitive biological resources without any cost-sharing assistance,there may be no need for such a watershed management group.Cooperation with a watershed management group would be voluntary,but the protections described below in the guidelines will be required whether ranchers work with the group or prefer to work independently. Focus of Cooperative Watershed Management Group If instituted,the focus of the group should be on the development of alternate water and nutrient sources,and their location away from riparian areas along Tassajara Creek,major tributaries and sensitive resources at springs and seeps.Other issues could include pest management,soil conservation,restoration of native plants,and enhancement of native wildlife populations. Technical and Funding Assistance The Natural Resources Conservation Service(formerly known as the Soil Conservation Service)can provide technical assistance,while the Farm Services Agency administers the Agriculture Conservation Program cost-sharing program.Cost-sharing assistance for landowners may be available through the Agricultural Conservation Program(ACP), administered by the Farm Services Agency for developing watering troughs away from springs or seeps,or pumping water from the creek.The Natural Resources Conservation Service can offer technical assistance,and already has extensive contacts with the ranching community.A watershed-based cooperative approach between interested parties would facilitate the acquisition of cost-sharing funds and/or a grant for implementing improvements.Management of such a group is time-consuming however.If a watershed management group is formed,the City of Dublin should anticipate taking a lead in its formation and management.A longer lead time is now required to get cost-sharing grants and a watershed approach with multiple cooperators is preferred by the disbursing agency. GRAZING MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES Grazing generates income,reduces fire hazard,and helps retain the rural ambiance of the area. Recognizing the intensification of use anticipated by the Specific Plan,the adaptations of 7 grazing practices described in this document will be needed to meet the expectations of ranchers,the City of Dublin and future residents of the area. Grazing within the Eastern Dublin GPA area should be consistent with the goals described above and the guidelines developed in this section.This section describes grazing management guidelines that will help ensure the resource protection required by the Specific Plan. Protection of Riparian Areas,Springs and Seeps Cattle and horses need watering sources,but left uncontrolled,can damage riparian and wetland vegetation,cause soil disturbance,degrade water quality,reduce the limited area of this critically important habitat area,and reduce the value of riparian,spring and seep habitats. Tassajara Creek,major tributaries,and the seeps and springs featured on Figure 3.7-A of the EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan are critically important in supporting wildlife and wetland vegetation given the hot,dry,rainless summers of the region. These water sources increase the habitat value of the surrounding area for wildlife, and provide habitat for plant and animal species that require aquatic habitat or a wetland environment for all or part of their life stages.The red-legged frog populations and areas of native vegetation noted on Figures 3.7-A and 3.7-C are largely dependent on the wetland and riparian resources of the area,particularly deep pools that hold water year-round.To protect these resources,cattle and horse watering should be shifted away from the creek,major tributaries,and seeps or springs to troughs in upland locations,if possible.There is evidence in the literature that cattle even prefer drinking from a trough to a stream(Clawson,1993). Supplemental feeding stations in upland locations will also reduce cattle and horse use of the creek,tributaries,seeps and springs.Development of alternate watering sources can only occur if sufficient water is available however.There may be cases where the development of alternate water sources is infeasible because of water scarcity.Landowners and the City of Dublin will have to negotiate solutions in these situations. Guideline 1:Watering troughs and nutrient dispensers should be developed in upland locations above the top of banks of Tassajara Creek and major tributaries throughout the Eastem Dublin GPA area where livestock grazing currently occurs adjacent to the Tassajara Creek,major tributaries,springs or seeps. Watering troughs should be fed by lines regulated by shut-off valves to prevent any overflow of the troughs or excess drainage of the springs or seeps.Gravity flow pipeline systems should be installed,as needed,to transport water from wells,isolated springs or seeps,or pool areas along dry creeks to storage sites outside of the riparian area.In some cases,a pump may be required to fill troughs where large grade differences occur.Sufficient water should remain to protect wetland values when a water source is developed to accommodate grazing animals. Guideline 2:Exclosures should be constructed to protect wetland areas and their ecotones (i.e.the transition between habitats)around the springs,seeps,and spring-fed ponds where grazing occurs.These exclosures should be gated to allow for the option of limited springtime grazing,to keep surrounding vegetation from becoming weedy and rank.Gates shall be closed to cattle and horses during the late springtime to keep wetland vegetation from being grazed heavily when adjacent hillsides begin to dry.Alternate sources of drinking water for grazing animals should be provided outside of the enclosed area.Exclosures must not present barriers to wildlife.Three to five-strand barbed wire fences are compatible with wildlife passage.Hog wire could be used if wild pigs are a problem in the area,but hog wire would impede the passage of native wildlife and is therefore less preferable than barbed wire. Guideline 3:Livestock grazing in open space areas OS 2 and 3(discussed above in"Area Covered by Grazing Plan",and graphically represented on attached Figure 2B)should be discontinued when adjacent development occurs in the future because access to upland forage would be eliminated,and all livestock use would be concentrated within the riparian area. Movement of livestock into OS 2 from lands to the north of the Eastem Dublin GPA area should be prevented through the installation of limited exclusionary fencing.Ownership and management options for these areas are explored in the Eastem Dublin Comprehensive Stream Restoration Plan(Sycamore Associates,1996). Guideline 4:Livestock grazing should be excluded from the arroyo willow riparian woodland along the Fallon Road tributary through the installation of exclusionary fencing. Management of Rare,Threatened,Endangered,and Sensitive Plants No rare or endangered plants were found during field surveys for the EIR.The alkali springs are sufficiently degraded to merit no special protection from grazing,but may be considered as mitigation sites for future development. Wildlife Habitat Protection Plant communities are not static but change in reaction to climate,fire,drought,plant competition,and other events. Wildlife communities change in response to changes in the plant community.Wildlife species native to this region evolved with these plant communities,and developed preferences for various successional stages. Some species are adapted only to certain habitat conditions,and when those conditions disappear,so do dependent wildlife species. Known occurrences of sensitive wildlife species within the areas to be zoned rural residential/agriculture or open space in the Eastem Dublin GPA area include:golden eagle nest on northeastern tributary,raptor nests,red-legged frog populations east of Tassajara Creek, and potential kit fox den sites.Grazing is not incompatible with the protection of the golden eagle or raptor nests,therefore livestock need not be excluded from the areas adjacent to these nests.Kit fox surveys conducted during the preparation of the EIR failed to detect the presence of kit fox but potential den sites were found(see Figure 3.7-C).Because grazing is compatible with kit fox habitat,no exclusionary fencing is needed. Guideline 5:Exclusionary fencing shall be installed around the known locations of red-legged frog populations on tributaries in the northeast portion of the Eastem Dublin GPA area. Exclosures shall be gated to allow the option of limited springtime grazing to keep surrounding 9 (` vegetation from becoming weedy and rank.Exclosures must not present barriers to native wildlife.Three to five-strand barbed wire fences are compatible with wildlife passage and should be used.Gates shall be closed to cattle and horses during the late springtime to keep wetland vegetation from being grazed heavily when adjacent hillsides begin to dry. Fire Hazard Reduction Grazing can be used to significantly reduce the volume and height of fuels in the Eastem Dublin GPA area's non-native grasslands.Fuel loads can be optimally managed through the determination of carrying capacity and close monitoring of stocking numbers,timing and duration of grazing.Fuel levels can be managed,and the goal is to leave the optimal amount to protect soil resources and assure grass stocking for the following year.Stock rotation however, requires the availability and feasibility of alternate range.The most significant sources of ignition lie along Tassajara and Fallon roads.Cattle and horse grazing in the rural residential/agriculture and open space areas adjacent to these roads will reduce fuel loads. Guideline 6:Excessive fuel loads in rural residential/agriculture and open space areas adjacent to Tassajara and Fallon roads can be managed by cattle and horse grazing.Optimal herd sizes, timing and rotation can be determined using the information provided in the Forest Service Range Environmental Analysis Handbook(1984)and the East Bay Regional Parks District Wildland Management Policies and Guidelines(1992). Soil Erosion and Water Quality Protection Cattle and horse use of Tassajara Creek,major tributaries,seeps and springs will be greatly reduced through the development of alternate watering sources,and with exclusionary fencing around springs and seeps.Reducing cattle and horse use of the creek will serve to protect water quality as well as reduce soil erosion along livestock tracks down into the creek.The protection measures described in Guideline 1 above will serve to protect water quality and reduce soil erosion. Native Plant Cover Native plant cover along Tassajara Creek,tributaries,seeps and springs will be protected by the development of alternate watering sources and limited exclusionary fencing.These measures are described in Guideline 1.Restoration plantings are discussed in the Eastern Dublin Comprehensive Stream Restoration Plan(Sycamore Associates,1996). Range Forage Utilization The amount of mulch or residual dry matter(dead plant matter,RDM)remaining in any one year can influence plant productivity and plant composition the following growing season. Low amounts of mulch tend to favor the growth of undesirable plants(Heady 1956,Hooper and Heady 1970). An optimum mixture of desirable plant species results on non-native grassland where 600 to 800 pounds per acre are left(Pitt and Heady 1978,Bartolome et al. 1980). Too much mulch results in a thatch,which inhibits new plant growth(Clawson and McDougald 1982).In general,more mulch is needed in steep areas than on flat land.Plant cover is another important variable that needs consideration. Guideline 7: Forage utilization by grazing animals should be managed by landowners to assure that appropriate amounts of RDM remain on the ground at the end of the season. Various residual mulch guidelines exist for different sites in the California annual grassland type (Clawson and McDougald 1982,U.S.Forest Service 1984). In general,four to six inches of standing vegetation should remain at the end of the grazing season. Individual areas may have special circumstances that require that additional mulch remain. Residue requirements will vary according to the need to promote soil stability, maintain plant productivity,or protect wildlife habitat.Plant cover should be sufficient to minimize bare areas subject to erosion. Supplemental Feeding In fall and early winter domestic livestock are often unable to consume enough forage to meet their nutritional needs. This deficiency may be offset by feeding grains,molasses,or hay. During the late winter and spring,an adequate diet of all the essential nutrients,with the possible exception of salt and certain minerals,can be obtained from the natural forage.Forage quality follows a declining trend as the seasons progress,and further supplementation is often necessary.In order to minimize cattle and horse impacts on riparian and wetland resources, supplemental feeding stations should be located in upland locations away from these areas. Guideline 8: Supplemental feeding of cattle and horses,if needed,should be provided outside of the riparian buffer along Tassajara Creek,major tributaries and away from the wetland areas around springs and seeps. Rodenticide and Herbicide Use Rodenticides are known to harm native wildlife,including carnivores and other non-target species,especially raptors and kit fox.Furthermore,the squirrel populations that are often the target of rodenticide poisoning are beneficial to many native wildlife species of the region, including kit fox,burrowing owl,red legged frog and California tiger salamander.Program 6N of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan stipulates that "The use of rodenticides and herbicides within the project area should be restricted to avoid impacts on wildlife.The City of Dublin shall require any poisoning programs to be done in cooperation with and under supervision of the Alameda County Department of Agriculture." Guideline 9:To protect wildlife populations and habitat,the use of rodenticides within the project area should be restricted.Ground squirrels should be controlled by trapping and shooting or accepted integrated pest management(IPM)procedures and practices consistent with other City of Dublin regulations.Landowners are encouraged to assess the extent of pest infestations and define the actual threat prior to initiating a control program.The use of herbicides to control noxious weeds should be consistent with label precautions. MONITORING Monitoring by the City of Dublin Through discussions with landowners and grazing lessees,the City should negotiate voluntary agreements for the installation of watering troughs,supplemental feeding stations and exclusionary fencing around springs and seeps consistent with this grazing management plan. Compliance with the grazing management plan will be conditions for rezone and tentative map approval. The City of Dublin will conduct annual site checks to determine whether watering troughs have been developed and are functionally maintained,and if exclusionary fencing around springs, seeps and red-legged frog locations has been installed,is being adequately maintained,and if management of limited springtime grazing is protecting the wetland resources.Should any measures agreed upon by the City of Dublin and landowners or the cooperative watershed management group be inadequately implemented,the City of Dublin should send a letter to the responsible landowner,asking that corrective measures be taken to ensure compliance with the grazing management plan and the individual timetable and agreement between the City and the landowner. City staff should also develop a working agreement with the Natural Resources Conservation Service,the Alameda County Resource Conservation District or a private consultant to monitor the condition of the vegetation in the riparian buffer along Tassajara Creek,tributaries and springs and seeps in areas being grazed.Adjustments in the location of supplemental feeding stations or the need for additional exclusionary fencing should be developed with the technical assistance available through these parties. 12 I� L/C- General Plan -Eastern Extended Planning Area LAND USE MAP Legend COMMERCIAL Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial ;- Campus Office —_1 Industrial Park RESIDENTIAL _1 High Densi'y 25- du/ac I MH ii Medium. Hich Density : t-25 du ac Medium Density E-?4 du/.c u ` Lori Density 0-6 di/a,: & Rurai residential/,L',cric.'tore ; du/,CO ac PUBLIC/SEMFPUBLIC/OPEN Public/Semi-Pubiic Facility Elementary School Junior High School +s High School Public/Semi-Public 0 Parks & Recreation U City Park Community Park E? Neighborhocd Park Neighborhood Square Open Space Stream Corrid0r(Will be designated as open space, CIRCULATION --- Arterial Street --- Coi!ector Street ......... Transit Spine SOI Boundary ---- General Plan Amendment Study Area ---- Specific Plan Study Area May 10, 1993 AS T E tul"N DUBLIN W.agace Roberts & Todd acres 0 7 General Commercial may be permitted by a Planned Development Zoning Process (see text for complete discussion ) ** Will convert to Future Study Area/Agriculture where determined inconsistent with APA (see text for complete discussion) Figure 26 0 1000 2000 Feel V 0 vv 1/2 M,le 3!4 C ■ _7�% C& Habitat a 1 800 I-1-80 Wind d r4 •r J L Legend - ----- General Plan Amendment Area 0 n. R_ Specific Plan Area Developed Northern A� _5�rl1. 't. a Riparian forest f -native grassland Non • ...... .. .... -farming Dry M rotational cropland 0 % t -Hermittent streams 7� % 5 Alkalai grassland 5 Arroyo willow riparian woodland _g:: Ruderal field F77-1 Z� 'Aww... S C ante RI Rehabs axj:n ent ........ .A Freshwater marsh .... ........ . . ........ I.'X, A E-1 H . ....... ...... . . . .......... ............. 0 Springs, seeps, s ....... _ck tan� and pond 8fo ............ • ............. ... ............ ..... .................... ............ * 111 .. ........ CO O'V =x .........ti ........... ...... .... ..................... A I V, A-UHUHL� ........... ...... X. .............. 'TERN "UBLIN .............. ............. E A Sw L) .................. . .... . ....... ............... 'PA SP OR ................................... .. . . ....... ........ .................. ............... ... .. . ...................................................... 3.7 A ..................................... ............. ... ... Wallace Roberts & Todd Figure ....... ............ .............. ... . ................. ...... .......... Hacienda Business Park 2� ..4 Livermore Airport Ck Acres 10 0 1000 2000 Feet Mrmm" 40 0 1/4 1/2 Mile 3/4 _.. - Olt Sensitive Species \ii Legend ' � r �• _.. �` .: r is Gene ------- - Amendment Area V. �, ,��� ;' "$s°^- '°°�. °, �' �" `' _�-•, r-. ,- -- -- ..-= ! �-�-,-., General Plan J1 ! Tx. / i \ v su \ •� _ � _— ��>: J', - -. _ :--- - _-_-Specific Plan Area .. r Red tailed hawk .:�/ r nest other raptor EMS '�-- .�. Vi._ e.. � ,.. •-=--=�-�=-- ��--`�.�—> `=�= �>�,�<:>'•�?eagle.Golden nest\<�.} - «... sic .µ .y. 17 A Western pond turtle location , ® - — .,.?.r �, Red leggedjroglocation ME — � ...«. .., . ....:.,........ ...,...: .. ---'- -- fox dens _ .. ..._ ^...::::........r.,.. .v.. .. _ .. ` ----' ---- Potential kit - :w; ✓ . .2F• ^ ..:.... :2.......:,.....T. Approximate area searched •�. o:} 2 r' _ in kit fox dens r....%•.., ,, f.,. .�,. .T...�'..<.- '� _ for San Joaquin wX q �'� _ n^ar` x.;✓... 2 A:o.. .r.:__J / '\ it c:.:}..- �:�,.. H: a - i+\•.v. .r`:"'Y :,:%.':1i:'.'•�^�,\i!�%ji:v��`i�T`tiy.'�nV: ?•:::vn nw:: n:v::: �. r `J . _ ;ice`<:> ``: . 3,>r Y. :7•r,.:;;a.::: ri: , <3 .� _ 1• Santa Rehabili{tin ••/I - `-�� :r T v _ --1 1 .e m \ i r• i Ir ! - - - - - oUVA CD 1 :}: "•'r Wallace Roberts & Todd Figure 3.7 — C Hacienda Business Park � \ - '- \ �— \ j-/'— Acres 0 1000 2000 Feel ' 40 _ Livermore Airport — 0 1/4 112 Mile REFERENCES Bartolome,J.W., M.C.Stroud,and H.F.Heady. 1980.Influence of Natural Mulch on Forage Production on Differing California Annual Range Sites.Journal of Range Management 33:4-8. City of Dublin,Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan and FEIR, December 1992. Clawson,Jeffrey E.1993.The Use of Off-stream Water Developments and Various Water Gap Configurations to Modify the Watering Behavior of Grazing Cattle.Unpublished Masters Thesis.Oregon State University. Clawson,W.J.and N.K.McDougald.1982.Residual Dry Matter as Utilization Standards for California Annual Range.Proceedings,Westem Section,American Society of Animal Science. East Bay Regional Park District 1992.Wildland Management Policies and Guidelines. Adopted August 18,1992. Heady,H.F. 1956.Changes in a California Annual Plant Community Induced by Manipulation of Natural Mulch.Ecology 37:798-812. Hooper,J.F.and H.F.Heady.1970.An Economic Analysis of Optimum Rates of Grazing in the California Annual-type Grassland.Journal of Range Management 23:307-311. Pitt,M.D.and H.F.Heady. 1978.Responses of Annual Vegetation to Temperature and Rainfall Patterns in Northern California.Ecology 59-2:336-350. Sycamore Associates,Balance Hydrologics and dk Associates. 1996.Eastern Dublin Comprehensive Stream Restoration Plan.(draft) U.S.Forest Service 1984.Range Environmental Analysis Handbook. 16 7-I City Of Dublin Wildfire Management Plan Or DU 4e Oti ti4A 1 0 19 ", 82 11=44 %44/101c1**\� Developed by: The City of Dublin in cooperation with the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority Adopted: 1996 Resolution No. EX tt i1 CITY OF DUBLIN WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to reduce the risk of open land wildfire to the lowest practical level consistent with reasonable protection of wildlife habitat and other open space values. AUTHORITY Adopted by the Dublin City Council Resolution Number dated , 1996. REQUIREMENTS SATISFIED This plan,when implemented,will create effects or satisfy requirements as follows: • Implementation of the Wildfire Management Plan is the responsibility of the City of Dublin. • Vegetation and habitat(in open space)will only change as a result of natural forces or other actions,since this plan does not impose requirements into open space. • This plan,when implemented,provides a Fire Buffer Zone between open space/undeveloped lands and developed properties;therefore,no additional brush control measures are required where this plan is utilized. • Vegetation growth within areas affected by this plan will be monitored in two ways. First,all areas will be inspected in accordance with the Fire Department's Nuisance Abatement Program. Second, whenever any building,grading or other activity affects open space or Fire Buffers,it will be reevaluated. • Wildlife habitat will be evaluated by the City when any change is proposed in open space areas. APPLICABILITY This Wildfire Management Plan applies to all new development within the City of Dublin. DEFINITIONS Adjacent to Open Space-This refers to subdivisions,commercial parcels and residential lots which have a point of contact with open space. Adjacent to Undeveloped-This refers to subdivisions,commercial parcels and residential lots which have a point of contact with undeveloped land. City of Dublin Wildlfire Management Plan Page i June 11,1996 Fire Buffer Zone-Areas A,B,C and D of the"Vegetation Establishment and Maintenance Guidelines" contained in this plan. Irrigated-To supply water to the Fire Buffer Zone artificially by means of pipes,pumps,etc. Landscape Plan-This plan specifies the plantings which are to be utilized in areas A,B,C and D of the Fire Buffer Zone. Open Space-For purposes of this plan,open space is defined as those lands which are set aside to be developed. Undeveloped Land-For purposes of this plan,undeveloped land is that land which is available fro development but no Tentative map has been approved. Vicinity Plan-Areas within 300 feet of boundaries or property lines of subdivisions,commercial parcels and residential lots. Vicinity Plans include property lines,structures,slope,vegetation,fuel breaks, water supply systems and access roads. VARIANCES&APPEALS An applicant wishing a variance to this plan shall submit their request to the Fire Chief in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code,Section 103 as amended by the City or its designee. An applicant wishing to appeal a requirement placed upon them by the requirements of this plan shall file their appeal in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code,Section 103 as amended by the City or its designee. OWNERSHIP AND FINANCING OF MAINTENANCE FOR OPEN SPACE The City requires that a responsible entity be selected or formed to be responsible for owning and maintaining open space. The City also requires that the owner of record and maintenance responsibilities to be disclosed to potential purchasers of property. Ownership of Open Lands tract map approval. Once ownership is determined,responsibility for maintenance will be The City will evaluate each proposed project on assigned. a case by case basis to determine ownership of open space affiliated with the project. A Possible Forms of Ownership determination of ownership will be made in the development agreement,or in conjunction with The City will assign one or more forms of ownership to all open space as it is developed. City of Dublin Wildlfire Management Plan Page 2 June 11,1996 City Owned- When the City determines that the open space, all maintenance will be in needs will be best served by City ownership of accordance with City specifications at the the open space, the developer will be required to expense of the Home Owner Association. prepare the land according to all approved specifications and other requirements prior to Other Governmental Agency Provided - When transfer of ownership to the City. the City approves ownership by a Governmental Agency, that Governmental Agency will provide Developer/Home Owner Association Owned - maintenance. All maintenance will be in When the developer retains control of the open accordance with City specifications at the space, the City will require that the developer expense of that Governmental Agency. post a bond adequate to ensure development. The development agreement or site plan Possible Funding Sources for Maintenance approval will specify performance standards for the developer to meet, regarding open space The City will determine which is the most development. appropriate method of funding open space maintenance on a case by case basis. Other Governmental Agency Owned- Only with the City's approval can the ownership of open Methods include: space be transferred to another governmental body. • New Assessment District • Annex to Existing Assessment District Possible Maintenance Sources • Privately Funded by a homeowner's association or similar body Maintenance of the open space will be the • Other Funding Source responsibility of one party. A determination of responsibility for maintenance will be made in Notice to Owners conjunction with tract map approval or in the development agreement. The developer will be responsible for disclosing to all purchasers of property the ownership and City Provided- When the City elects to maintain maintenance responsibilities and funding open space, all associated expenses will be the mechanism for open space which is affiliated with responsibility of the City. the purchaser's property. In addition to any notices required by law, this disclosure will be Home Owner Association Provided - When the recorded on the title at time of sale of the City requires a Home Owner Association to own property. City of Dublin UVldlfire Management Plan Page 3 June 11, 1996 PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Plans will be examined for compliance with the Wildfire Management Plan in accordance with the following schedule: Tentative Mao Building Plan Review Tentative map submittals will address the Building plan submittals will address the following following issues: issues: • Ownership of open space and Fire Buffer • Final Landscape plans Zone • Construction requirements for properties • Maintenance of open space and Fire Buffer adjacent to open space and undeveloped Zone lands • Funding mechanism for maintenance of open space and Fire Buffer Zone. Final Approval of the Completed Proiect Prior to Occupancy Site Development Review All sites,tracts and buildings will be subject to a Plans submitted for site development review will final inspection by each approving department. address the following issues: Departments will give final approval only after all conditions which have been placed on it by that • Design of the Fire Buffer Zone department have been complied with. • Maintenance and Irrigation Plan for the Fire Buffer Zone Fees • Maintenance Plan for Open Space • Maintenance Specifications All fees to all departments must be current before • Budget for the Maintenance Program any of the following actions are taken: • Preliminary Landscape plan for privately owned properties • Tentative Map Approval • Vicinity Plan • Site Development Review • Issuance of a Building Permit • Final inspection of a Completed Project prior to occupancy CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS ON LOTS OR PARCELS ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE AND UNDEVELOPED LAND Roof Covering profile allows a space between the roof covering and roof decking,the space at the Roof covering shall be Class A roof eve ends shall be fire stopped to preclude coverings. For roof coverings where the entry of flames or embers. Roof decking City of Dublin Wildlfre Management Plan Page 4 June 11,1996 �<O 7 shall be solid. Space sheathing shall be buildings with habitable spaces and prohibited. projections,such as decks, shall be of one- hour-rated fire-resistive construction, heavy Protection of Eaves timber construction or constructed with noncombustible materials. Eaves shall be protected on the exposed underside by materials approved for one- When the attached structure is located and hour-rated fire-resistive construction. Fascias constructed so that the structure or any are required and must be protected on the portion thereof projects over a descending backside by materials approved for one-hour- slope surface, the area below the structure rated fire-resistive construction or 2-inch(51 shall have all underfloor areas enclosed to mm)nominal dimension lumber. within 6 inches of the ground, with exterior walls. Gutters and Downspouts Windows Gutters and downspouts shall be constructed of noncombustible material. Exterior windows,window walls and skylights shall be tempered glass or multilayered Exterior Walls glazed panels. Exterior walls of buildings or structures shall Exterior doors be constructed with materials approved for one-hour-rated fire-resistive construction on Exterior doors, other than vehicular access the exterior side or with noncombustible doors to garages,shall be non-combustible or materials. solid core not less than 1-3/4"thick. When windows are within doors, they shall be of Exception: Heavy timber construction. Such tempered glass or multilayered glazed material shall extend from the top of the panels. foundation to the underside of the roof sheathing. Vents Unenclosed Underfloor Protection Attic ventilation openings, foundation or underfloor vents,or other ventilation openings Buildings or structures shall have all in vertical exterior walls and vents through • underfloor areas enclosed to the ground with roofs shall not exceed 144 square inches exterior walls. each. Such vents shall be covered with noncumbustible corrosion-resistant mesh with Exception: Complete enclosures may be openings not to exceed 1/4 inch. omitted where the underside of all exposed floors and all exposed structural columns, Attic ventilation openings shall not be located beams and supporting walls are protected as in soffits,in eave overhangs,between rafters required for exterior one-hour-rated fire- at eaves, or in other overhang areas. resistive construction or heavy timber Underfloor ventilation openings shall be construction. located as close to grade as practical. Aooendages and Projections Unenclosed accessory structures attached to City of Dublin Wildlfire Management Plan Page 5 June 11,1996 Detached Accessory Structures and Fences Fences shall be separated from the perimeter of buildings containing habitable Detached accessory structures located less space by connection to buildings as shown in than 50 feet from a building containing Figure 1 when the fence is made of habitable space shall have exterior walls combustible material. constructed with materials approved for one- hour fire-resistive construction,heavy timber Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems construction or constructed with noncombustible materials on the exterior Automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be side. When the detached structure is located required in all buildings that are adjacent to and constructed so that the structure or any open space or undeveloped land. The portion thereof projects over a descending installation of the automatic fire sprinkler slope surface,the area below the structure systems shall be in accordance with shall have all underfloor areas enclosed to standards approved by the City. within 6 inches of the ground, with exterior walls. EXTERIOR BUILDING LINE 1/2' SPACE 2 Air ���\�\ 4' EXTERIOR MINIMUM I � VENEER 1--24 4 - *5 MINIMUM PLAN I I 16' SQUARE i I OO ETE NCR C PILASTER EXTERIOR VENEER IITr i I TO MATCH EXTERIOR FINISH I I (STUCCO, BRICK, STONE, ETC.) 18' 24'X24'X18' _ -CONCRETE GRADE BEAM MIN.DEPTH DEPTH OR REFER TO PROJECT REI NOTES, REPORT. I. FILL ALL CELLS WITH GROUT. 2. MORTAR SHALL RE GR ADE EE 3. CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6 pSl. 4. REBAR SHALL GRADE 0. 60. 5. NO SPECIAL INSPECTION.24 DIA. ELEVATION MASONRY PILASTER AT FENCE/BUILDING SCALE. 1'41' Figure 1 City of Dublin Wildlfire Management Plan Page 6 June 11,1996 STANDARDS FOR VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE The City requires that all new development utilize the following standards for vegetation establishment and maintenance. VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT GUIDELINES VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT GUIDELINES 0% TO 10% SLOPE 10% to 20% SLOPE C , :. ..•Vfli '',:1/7'1 '.,':,It,'',*:y1:1'.'"'.1 WAOOE - . ,,,Xhr ,' I I i I i I I 4 1 1 1444 A= The First 3 Feet The shaded areas(upslope)of B,C and D remain a constant Maintain an area of non combustible material- distance of 10 feet,20 feet and 70 feet,respectively. The shaded flowers,plants,concrete,gravel,soil,etc. area begins from the midsection of a structure. The unshaded areas(downslope)of B,C and increase with slope as detailed B= 4 thru 13 feet below: Remove all trees and downed woody fuels. A= The First 3 Feet C= 14 thru 34 feet Maintain an area of noncombustible material- Thin trees to 10 feet between crowns. Prune flowers,plants,concrete,gravel,soil,etc. limbs of all remaining trees to 15 feet or one- third the total live crown height,whichever is B= 4 thru 19 feet less. Remove all downed woody fuels. Maintain Remove all trees and downed woody fuels. grasses at 3 inches or less. Remove all downed woody fuels. C= 20 thru 45 feet Thin trees to 10 feet between crowns. Prune D= 35 thru 100 feet limbs of all remaining trees to 15 feet or one- Thin trees to 10 feet between crowns. Prune third the total live crown height,whichever is limbs of remaining trees to 15 feet or one-third less. Maintain grasses at 3 inches or less. the total live crown height,whichever is less. Remove all downed woody fuels. Remove all downed woody fuels more than 3 inches in diameter. D= 46 thru 100 feet Thin trees to 10 feet between crowns. Prune limbs of all remaining trees to 15 feet or one- third the total live crown height,whichever is less. Remove all downed woody fuels more than 3 inches in diameter. City of Dublin Wildfire Management Plan June 11, 1996 Page 7 VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT GUIDELINES VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT 20%to 30%SLOPE GUIDELINES GREATER THAN 30%SLOPE When developed,slopes of greater than 30%shall be evaluated on a case by case basis. VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT UP GUIDELINES IN OTHER OPEN SPACE There are no requirements for vegetation reduction or modification in open space that is not affected by the guidelines for 0%to 10%Slope,10%to 20%Slope, 20%to 30%Slope or Greater than 30%Slope. b I VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT GUIDELINES GENERAL PREMISE Distances outlined in Vegetation Establishment Guidelines for 10%to 20%slopes and 20%to 30% slopes relate to the down slope portion of the property. Portions of the property at 0%grade or up slope rely on the 0%to 10%guideline. The shaded areas(upslope)of B,C and D remain a constant distance of 10 feet,20 feet and 70 feet respectively.The shaded VEGETATION MAINTENANCE area begins from the midsection of a stmcture.The unshaded areas(downslope)of B,C and D increase with slope as detailed below: The city requires that a maintenance program be established for Zones A,B,C and D that will A= The First 3 feet maintain plant species according to city approved Maintain an area of noncombustible material- specifications. Maintenance programs should flowers,plants,concrete,gravel,soil,etc. specifically prevent the introduction of unapproved species and plan for removal of overgrowth and dead B= 4 thru 24 feet foliage. The maintenance program should also plan Remove all trees and downed woody fuels. for the replacement of dead plants and plants which C= 25 thru Si feet are beyond useful life. Thin trees to 10 feet between crowns.Prune IRRIGATION limbs of remaining trees to 15 feet or one-third the total live crown height,whichever is less. Maintain surface vegetation at 3 inches or less. Areas A,B and C in the 0%to 10%guidelines and Remove all downed woody fuels. areas A,B,C and D in all others shall be irrigated in accordance with the requirements of the plant species D= 56 thru 125 feet utilized. Thin trees to 10 feet between crowns.Prune limbs of all remaining trees to 15 feet or one- third the total live crown height,whichever is OPEN SPACE ACCESS less. Remove all downed woody fuels more than 3 inches in diameter. All open space areas shall have two points of access suitable for wildland fire apparatus. Minimum unobstructed width of the access way must be 20 feet. Access points must be no more than 1500" from the furthest point of open space. Gates,when utilized,must meet the key control requirements of the fire department. City of Dublin Wildfire Management Plan June I I,1996 77 Page 8 IN City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table This table outlines plant species appropriate for planting in conjunction with the"Standards for Vegetation Establishment and Maintenance Guidelines." ` Species Name Characteristics Species-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Dead Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Matter Content AREA A This area must contain non-combustible material. Irrigated flowers are the only suitable plant life. AREA B This area is suitable for irrigated lawn,all of the plant species shown for Area A above,and the following irrigated plant species. Aeonium arboreum-Atropurpureum Aeonium suc * * tc tr A 0 yes Aeonium undulatum Saucer Plant suc * * tr tr {'r 0 yes Agapanthus orientalis blue Lily of the Nile peren tr. A- tc A A- 0 yes Agapanthus"Peter Pan" Dwarf Lily of the Nile peren A tr A tc A- 0 yes Agave americana"Alba Picata" Agave suc 0 0 tr A 'c A- no Agave attenuata"Nova" Blue Agave suc 0 0 tr tc it A- yes Aloe arborenscens Tourch Aloe suc A tr tr A is 0 yes Aloe"Johnson's Hybrid" No Common Name suc s r tc tr tr tr 0 yes Aloe nobilis Aloe suc A tr tr tr tr 0 yes Aloe Striata Coral Aloe suc A A tr 'r IN- 0 yes Aloe vera Medicinal Aloe sac A tr ti' tr tr 0 yes Aloe X spinosissima Spider Aloe suc * tr tr tr * 0 yes Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree tree 0 0 * A tc 0 no Arctotheca calendua Capeweed gr cvr tr A. A. tc 0 * no Ameria alliacea Sea Pink gr cvr tc 'r 0 * * 0 no 1 r�Ameria maritma Sea Pink gr cvr tr tr 0 tr A- 0 no Page 9 City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table • Species Name Characteristics Speicies-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Dead Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Matter Content America pseupaemeria Sea Pink gr cvr * A 0 it ' 0 no (formosana) Carissa grandiflora"Tutter" Natal Plum shrub 0 0 A 7 'Or 0 yes Carpobrofus edulis Hottentot Fig sue * 'Or A 0 'A' 0 yes Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud shrub * it ' * * 0 no Coprosoma kirkii"Verde Vista" Prostrate Mirror Plant suc A A * A A 0 yes Cotyledon barbenyii No common name suc ' A ' ' tr 0 yes Cotyledon macrantha No common name suc A A 'Or A 'Cr 0 yes Cotyledon orbiculata No common name suc ' A A A A 0 yes Crassula arborescens Silver Jade Plant suc A 'Or A A A O yes Crassula argentea"Pink Beauty" Pin Jade Plant suc A A A A A 0 no Crassula lactea Crassula suc A ' A A A 0 yes Crassula lactea"Taylor's Patch" Crassula suc A t4 'A' A A 0 yes Crassula multicava Crassula sue * A A A A 0 yes Crassula tetragona Crassula suc A' A A ' A 0 yes Delosperma alba White Trailing Ice Plant suc A A A A t'r 0 no Dietes"Lemon Drop" No Common Name peren A -Cr A A A 0 no Dietes bicolor Yellow Wild Iris peren {'r A A A A 0 no Dietes vegeta White Fortnight Lily peren A A ' A A 0 no ,),,, Drosanthermum Iloribundum rosea Ice Plant peren ' A A 'r {r 0 no Drosanthermum hispidum Ice Pant peren A A A A A 0 no Page 10 City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table Species Name Characteristics Speicies-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Dead Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Matter Content Duchesnea indica Mock Strawberry grd cvr A * t'r A A 0 no Dymondia margaretae No Common Name grd cvr A A A- A A 0 no Echeveria"Blue Wave" Echeveria sue A- A -A- A A 0 no Echeveria"Pinkie" Echeveria suc * - A of A- 0 no Echeveria"Topsy Turvy" Echeveria suc A- A A of A 0 no Erigeron"Moerheimii" Fleabane peren ok ok 0 7 0 0 no Erigeron karvinskianus Santa Barbara Daisy peren ok ok 0 7 0 0 no Fejoa sellowiana Pineapple Guava shrub 0 O -'f of O * no Festuca mba creeping Red Fescue grd cvr A A- 0 A 0 0 no Fragaria chileoensis Wild Strawberry grd cvr * * * A * 0 no Gazania"Mitsuwa Orange" Orange Gazania grd cvr of * 0 A * 0 no Gazania"Mitsuwa Yellow" Yellow Gazania grd cvr At- * 0 A �f O no Hemerocallis(assorted) Day Lily peren * A A A - 0 no Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca suc A- * A A of 0 7 Jasminum ligistifolium Shiny Leaf Jasmine vine A 0 0 it A 0 no Juniperus conferta Shore Juniper shrub A A 0 0 0 oils no Kalanchoe pumila Kalanchoe suc i'f A A A -A- O 7 Kniphofia uvaria Red Hot Poker pem A- A- A 0 A 0 no Lampranthus aurantiacus Bush Gold suc A - Af A A 0 yes Lampranthus spectabilis rosea Trailing Ice Plant suc A A -A- A -A- 0 yes \.IJ Macademea"Dr.Beaumont" Macademea tree 0 0 Af A A- 0 yes Page 11 City of Dublin Plant Species and Arca of Use Table Species Name Characteristics Spcicies-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Dead Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Matter Content Malephora crocea Croceum Ice Plant suc it * A * A 0 yes Myoporum Parvifolium Prostrate Myoporum grd cvr A A 0 A 0 0 yes Nerine masonorum Nerine bulb * * tr A ' O no Nerium oleander"Mrs.Roeding" Dwarf Pink Oleander shrub 0 0 0 A * 0 no Nerium oleander"Petite Salmon" Dwarf Salmon Oleander shrub 0 0 0 * 'Cr 0 no Pelargonium peltatum Ivy Geranium peren 0 A' 'Cr A ' 0 no Phormium tenax"Maori Maiden" New Zealand Flax , peren 0 0 0 A 0 0 no Phomium tenax"Maori Queen" New Zealand Flax peren 0 0 0 ' 0 0 no Phormium tenax"Maori Sunset" New Zealand Flax peren 0 0 0 A 0 0 no Pittosporum c."Compacta" Dwarf Karo shrub 0 0 A ' ' O no Pittosporum tobira"Wheeler's Mock Orange shrub -Or A A tr A 0 no Dwarf' Punica Granatum"Nana" Dwarf Pomegrante shrub 0 A 0 A 0 0 no Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak tree 0 tr O A 0 0 no Ribes viburnifolium Evergreen Currant shrub 0 0 * 0 * 0 no Scaevola"Mauve Clusters" Fan Flower grd cvr .a- A O A A O no Schinus molle California Pepper tree 0 0 0 * 0 0 no Sedum acre Stonecrop suc * * * * A 0 yes Sedum album Stonecrop suc tl tf A * 0 yes Sedum brevifolium Stonecrop suc * * tr * * 0 yes Sedum confusum Stonecrop suc * * A * * 0 yes -� Page 12 City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table Species Name Characteristics Speicies-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Dead Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Matter Content Sedum lineare Stonecrop suc * * tr * At. 0 yes Sedum roses Rose Root sac -A Ar Ar -A- A- 0 yes Sedum rubrotinctum Stonecrop suc A * * *r - 0 yes Sedum spathulifolium"Purpureum" Stonecrop suc A * A- - it O yes Senecio cinerea Dusty Miller peren it - 0 A O -A- no Senecia kleinia"Mandraliscae" No Common Name peren it tr 0 A. * 0 yes Thevetia peruviana neriifolia Yellow Oleander shrub 0 0 0 Ar A. 0 no Trachelospermumjasminoides Star Jasmine vine 0 0 A A- tr 0 no Tulbaghia violacea"Silver Lace" Society Garlic peren A tr 0 0 A 0 no Yucca Whipplei Yucca peren Ar 0 0 -A- -A- 0 no AREA C This area is suitable for irrgated lawn,all of the plant species shown for Areas A and B above,and the following irrigated plant species. Achillea millefolium"Cerise Queen" Pink Yarrow peren * * 0 tir * * no Achillea millefolium"Red Beauty" Red Yarrow peren * - 0 A A -r no Achillea millefolium white White Yarrow peren Ar A. 0 t`r * tY no Achillea taygetea"Moonshine" Yarrow peren -r A. 0 A. A Ar no Achillea tomentosa Wooly Yarrow peren A A 0 Ar A tr no Ajuga reptans Carpet Bugle grd cvr A- -A- Co Ar A 0 no Arctostaphylos"Carmel Sur" Manzanita shrub A. -A- 0 0 0 A no Arctostaphylos"Emerald Carpet" Manzanita shrub * -Cr 0 0 0 0 no Page 13 City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table Species Name Characteristics Speicies-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Dead Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Matter Content Arctostaphylos"Woods Red" Manzanita shrub 7 7 0 0 0 7 no Arctotheca calendula Cape Weed grd cvr * {'c sr * 0 * yes Artemisia"Canyon Gray" Silver Wormwood shrub 0 0 0 0 0 tc no Artemisia Caucasica Caucasian Sagebrush grd cvr * 'A' 0 0 0 * no Artemisia pycnocephala No Common Name shrub 'A' - 0 0 0 'Cr yes Atriplex nuttalli cuneata Saltbrush shrub 7 7 0 A ' * yes Atriplex muttalli gardneri Saltbrush shrub 7 7 0 >"c 'A' * yes Atriplex semibaccata Australian Saltbrush shrub A * 0 A A is yes Centaurea gymnocarpa Dusty Miller peren A A 0 A 0 * no Centranthus ruber Red Valerian peren * 'Or 0 * tic 0 no Centranthus ruber"Albus" White Valerian peren A A 0 * 'Cr 0 no Cheiranthus Erysimum Cheiri Wallflower peren A A 0 * A 0 no Coreopsis Ianceolata"Sun Ray" Coreopsis peren * * 0 'A -Cr 0 no Diplacus longifolius Monkey Flower peren O 0 0 0 0 0 no Deplacus puciceus Red Monkey Flower peren 0 0 0 0 0 0 no Elymus condensatus"Canyon Prince" No Common Name grd cvr it 'Or O 0 0 0 no Eriogonum crocatum Coastal Wild Gum peren A IN' 0 0 0 0 no Eriogonum grandiflora rubesens Island Buckwheat shrub 'A' A 0 0 0 0 no Eschscholzia califomica California Poppy peren tic * * A A 0 no Galvesia speciosa Island Bush Snapdragon shrub 0 0 0 tic A 0 no Gaura Iindheimerii Gaura peren 'A' 0 0 7 * 0 no Page 14 City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table Species Name Characteristics Speicies-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little(lead High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Matter Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Content Ganzania leucoleana hybrids Trailing Yellow Gazania peren * A O A A 0 no Gazania regens leucolaena Trailing Gazania peren ' A 0 A ic 0 no Geranium incanum Stork's Bill Geranium peren * A O O A O no Geranium sanguuineum Geranium peren * Sc * tic A 0 no Helichrysum petiolatum"nana" Curry Plant annual A * 0 0 0 ' yes Heuchera maxima Coral Bells or Island Alum grd cvr tic A A A 0 0 no Root Iris"Pacific Coast Hybrids" California Iris peren � A O A' ' O no Koeleria glauca Blue Hair Grass peren A' A 0 tic 0 0 no Lantana motevidensis Lantana grd cvr A 'Cr 0 0 A 0 no Lavandula dentata French Lavender peren 0 0 0 0 'A it no Lavandula stoechas Spanish Lavender peren 0 0 0 0 'A to no Limonium perezil Statice peren A A A ' A * yes Linaria maroccana Toad-Flax annual A A 0 0 ' 0 no Myoporum parvifollium"Prostratum" No Common Name grd cvr ' A A' ' * 0 no Oenothera berlandieri Mexican Evening Primrose peren A 'Or 0 A A 0 no Osteospermum fruticosum African Daisy grd cvr A ' 0 A ' 0 no Pelargonium peltatum Ivy Geranium peren A * * A A 0 yes Penstemon"Firebird" Red Penstemon peren A 0 A A 0 no Penstemon"Midnight" Beard Tongue peren A A 0 A A 0 no cw �A Penstemon"Skyline" Penstemon peren A Sr O A A 0 no Page 15 City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table Species Name Characteristics Speicies-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Dead Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Matter Content Penstemon heterophyllus Penstemon peren * tr 0 Ili. * 0 no Perovskia atriplicifolia Russian Sage peren 0 0 0 0 0 * no Phyla nodiflora Lippia grd cvr tr tr. O tr * A no Rosmarinus officinalis"Prostrata" Rosemary shrub -Cr tr 0 0 0 oils no Salvia"Allen Chickering" Sage shrub 7 7 7 0 0 t< no Salvia aurea Sage peren 0 0 A 0 0 * no Salvia chamaedryoides Sage shrub A tc 0 0 0 tr no Slavia leucantha Mexican Brush Sage shrub 0 0 0 0 0 tr no Salvia leucopylla Purple Sage shrub 0 0 0 0 0 tr no Salvia sonomensis"Dara's Choice" Sage peren 'Cr A 0 0 0 A no Santolin Chamaecyparissus Grey Lavender Cotton peren 0 ' 0 0 0 A no Santolina vireos Green Lavender Cotton peren 0 tc 0 0 0 A no Senecia"Vira-Vira" Dusty Miller shrub 0 0 0 A 0 * no Silene maritima No Common Name peren A A 0 A A A no Sisyrichium califomicum Yellow-Eyed Grass peren A A 0 A A 0 no Stachysbyzantina Lamb Ears peren ' A 0 tr A 0 no Thyme praecox articus Thyme peren tr A 0 'Or A oils no Thyme pseudolanuginosus Thyme peren A * 0 A A oils no Trichostema lanatum Woody Blue Curls shrub 0 0 0 * 0 oils no W Vinca major Periwinkle grd cvr 'Or * 0 A A 0 no Page 16 City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table Species Name Characteristics Speicies-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Dead Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Matter Content Vinca minor Myrtle shrub 0 0 r tr tr 0 no Yucca whipplei Yucca peren * * * * - 0 7 AREA D This area is suitable for irrigated lawn,all of the plant species shown for Areas A,B and C above,and the following irrigated plant species. Alnus rhombifloira White Alder tree 0 'Cr 0 tr * 0 no Arctostaphylos"Dr.Hurd" Manzanita , shrub A A 0 7 0 0 no Arctostaphylos pajaroenses Pajaro Manzaita shrub 0 0 0 7 0 0 no "Paradise" Carpobrotus edulis lceplant Sea Fig sue ' * * it 0 0 no Cercocarpus betuloides Mt.Mahogany shrub 0 0 0 * 0 0 no Ceanothus"Anchor Bay" Mountain Lilac shrub A 'Or 0 0 * 0 no Ceanothus"Frosty Blue" Mountain Lilac shrub 0 0 0 7 tt 0 no Ceanthothus"Joyce Coulter" Mountain Lilac shrub 0 0 0 0 A 0 no Ceanothus"Ray Hartman" Mountain Lilac shrub 0 0 * 7 * 0 no Ceanothus"Snow Flurry" Mountain Lilac shrub 0 O A 7 * 0 no Ceanothus"Wheeler Canyon" Mountain Lilac shrub 7 7 7 7 A 0 no Ceanothus"Yankee Point" Mountain Lilac shrub is - 0 u ' O no Ceanothus"Point Reyes" Mountian Lilac shrub * - 0 0 * 0 no Ceanothus griseus horizontalis Mountain Lilac shrub A * 0 0 * 0 no Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon shrub 0 0 * t4 A 0 no Prunus lyonil Catalina Cherry shrub 0 0 A A A 0 no Page 17 City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table Species Name Characteristics Speicics-Latin Name Species-Common Name Form Little Form Leaf Little High Mineral Freeze Volume (dense (thick Dead Moisture Content Sensitive or low) or large) Matter Content Quercus agrifolia Coffee Berry shrub 0 0 tir t• tr 0 no Rhamnus crocea Redberry shrub 0 0 Cr tr tr 0 no Romneya coulteri Matilija Poppy peren 0 0 Cr Cr Cr 0 no TREES The following is a list of trees that have a combination of characteristics which make them less flammable and as such are permitted in Areas C and D. Speices-Latin Name Species-Common Name Characteristics Acer(many) Maple • Growth structure which naturally provides for adequate separation between the tree canopy and ground(Citrus and Sequioa trees are exceptions). Aesculus californica Buckeye Citrus(many) Orange,lemon,lime • Leaf shape,and size which make it less likely to ignite. Generally leaves are big or thick. Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Tree Fraxinus(deciduous) Ash • High moisture content of the foliage. Usually deciduous trees have a higher moisture content. Liquidamber Sweet Gum • Little dead wood in the tree canopy. The listed trees generally do not hold onto or accumulate dead wood. Persimmon Persimmon Pistachia chinensis Pistachio Populus Poplar/Cottonwood Prunus(deciduous) Plums/Apples/Peaches Pyrus(deciduous) Pears Robiniana ambigua Locust Hybrids Salix(free form) Willows(tree form) Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood Page 18 City of Dublin Plant Species and Area of Use Table • Legend: 7 Unknown Property * Has the Property 0 Does Not Have the Property peren Perennial grd cvr Ground Cover suc Succulent Page 19 RESOLUTION NO.96- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE GRAZING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AREA AND THE CITY OF DUBLIN WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN WHEREAS,the City of Dublin adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan on May 10, 1993 and the Dublin voters approved the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan on November 2, 1993;and WHEREAS,the Final Environmental Impact Report(FEIR)for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan contains Mitigation Measure 3.7/4.0 and 3.4/12.0 that requires the City to prepare and approve a Grazing Management Plan and Wildfire Management Plan for the Eastern Dublin project area;and WHEREAS,both the Grazing Management Plan for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment Area(GMP)and the City of Dublin Wildfire Management Plan(WMP)implement Mitigation Measures 3.7/4.0 and 3.4/12.0 of the FEIR,respectively,and are consistent with the policies and action programs of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Chapter 6- Resource Management and Chapter 8-Community Services and Facilities of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan to the extent that the guidelines and standards of both documents will promote the protection of riparian and wetland areas and reduction in the risk of open land wildfire to the lowest level consistent with reasonable protection of wildlife habitat and other open space values, within the Eastern Dublin area;and WHEREAS,the WMP shall be applicable to all future developments throughout the City of Dublin. The GMP shall be applicable to the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area and shall be implemented on a voluntary basis until such time that Eastern Dublin land owners receive tentative map approval,or are issued grading permits consistent with the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. Future grazing within the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment area shall be restricted to those areas zoned Open Space and Rural Residential/Agriculture. The GMP shall be enforced as conditions of rezone and tentative map approval for areas zoned Open Space and Rural Residential/Agriculture;and WHEREAS,the City shall initiate any voluntary,cooperative measures with Eastern Dublin land owners for purposes of implementing the GMP,and shall monitor the progress of the GMP implementation;and WHEREAS,the GMP and WMP projects have been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the State CEQA Guidelines, and no new effects could occur and no new mitigation measures would be required for the projects that were not addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report(FEIR)for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan,and the projects are within the scope of the FEIR. The projects implement mitigation measures of the FEIR and an initial study will be conducted for each development application that is required to comply with the GMP and WMP documents;and WHEREAS,the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the GMP and WMP;and EXHIBIT C NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the GMP and WMP as defined in Exhibits A and B,respectively,of the Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 4, 1996. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1996. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Community Development Director eeasldubl\stream\6-4peres\crc EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN/SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL EIR MITIGATION MEASURES GRAZING MANAGEMENT PLAN MM 3.7/4.0 Grazing management plans shall be developed by the City and implemented soon after approval of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. Management plans shall favor protection of riparian and wetland areas,increased plant diversity,and the recovery of native plants,in particular,perennial grasses. WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN MM 3.4/12.0 The City,in consultation with DRFA and a qualified wildfire biologist,shall prepare a wildlife management plan for the project area. • The plan objective should be to reduce the risk of open land wildfire to the lowest practical level consistent with reasonable protection of wildlife habitat and other open space values. • The plan should define how the open lands of the project will be owned,used and maintained(consistent with the open space management plan),what wildfire hazard mitigation measures will be implemented,and how vegetation and wildlife habitat are likely to change over time as a result. • The selection or formation of an entity responsible for maintenance of the open lands should be subject to the Fire Chiefs approval,and any financial obligations of property owners to the maintenance entity should be disclosed to potential purchasers. • Where open lands are to be removed from grazing use,one or a combination of brush control measures,such as mowing,discing,herbicide application or the removal of combustible materials,should be selected to achieve the objectives of the plan. • Any park districts and/or open space agencies with ownership or management responsibilities within the Project area shall be requested to participate in and/or provide input to the preparation of the wildfire management plan for the project area. • Where new landscape planting is proposed,fire-resistant qualities should be a major consideration. New planting near structures should be irrigated. As a basic rule,a minimum of thirty feet shall be provided between new or existing homes and non-irrigated grassland. • The plan should specify who will be responsible for its implementation,and how its implementation will be paid for. • Since the scientific basis for wildland management is still inexact,it is also important that the plan provide for periodic monitoring of vegetation growth,wildlife habitat and fire risk, and for adoption of amendments if necessary to achieve the objectives of the plan on an ongoing basis. ATTACHMENT 1