HomeMy WebLinkAbout5-16-1988 PC Agenda CITY OF DUBLIN
Development Services Planning-Zoning 829-4916
P.O. Box 2340 Building & Safety 829-0E22
Dublin, CA 94568 Engineering/Public Works 829-4927
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Agenda for the
Dublin Planning Commission meeting of IA )/ I Cj 8
// 19 , was posted
at the Dublin Library, 7606 Amador Valley Boulevard, Dublin, California, on
the /3`_ of L.( , 198g, by L'OO p.m. .
Executed this /3 day of lq , 14 at Dublin,
California.
Laurence L. Tong
Planning Commission Secretary by
r
_c)/1
Pl/ahn'ng Secretary
. _. ....__.. _ ....,.._ --...+-..n�+m.--..��r..-.--T-.ca..----"a.rn.�r—._..rye..cn.....�....za-.`...r.�.�;wr..�=*-...,,..--,r-`.2:•..,,,,,,,-_. - .-,. ..r.ar_rr--->—s
AGENDA
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting - Dublin Library Monday - 7:00 p.m.
7606 Amador Valley Blvd., Meeting Room May 16, 1988
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
4. ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA
5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING - May 2, 1988
6. ORAL COMMUNICATION - At this time, members of the audience are permitted
to address the Planning Commission on any item which is not on the
Planning Commission agenda. Comments should not exceed 5 minutes. If
any person feels that this is insufficient time to address his or her
concern, that person should arrange with the Planning Director to have
his or her particular concern placed on the agenda for a future meeting.
7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.1 PA 88-018 Moore Tentative Map Tract 5900 Request
for a One Lot Subdivision on the East Side of Dougherty Road
Between Houston Place and Scarlett Court
8.2 88-029 Baxter's Conditional Use Permit Request to Allow a
Commercial Recreation Facility/Dancing at 7300 Amador Plaza
Road
9. NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS
9.1 Proposed Plan Line - New Road Parallel to and Southerly of
Dublin Boulevard (Between Amador Plaza Road and Regional
Street) (continued from meetings of April 4 and May 2, 1988).
10. OTHER BUSINESS
11. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONCERNS
12. ADJOURNMENT
(Over for Procedures Summary)
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 16, 1988
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff -t72__
SUBJECT: PA 88-018 Moore Tentative Map
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT: PA 88-018, Moore Tentative Map, Tract 5900
APPLICANT: John Moore
J. Patrick Land Co.
7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 403
Pleasanton, CA 94566
PROPERTY OWNER: B. J. Dublin Commercial
c/o J. Patrick Land Co.
7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 403
Pleasanton, CA 94566
LOCATION: East Side of Dougherty Road between future
extension of Dublin Blvd. and Sierra Lane
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-550-36, 40-44
PARCEL SIZE: 13.3+ acres
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Business Park/Industrial: Outdoor Storage
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE: Planned Development, 1411th Zoning Unit, Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE
AND ZONING: North: PD - 1411th Zoning Unit, industrial and
commercial
South: M-1 & C-2, industrial and commercial
East: A - Camp Parks RFTA
West: M-1 & C-2, commercial
ZONING SUBDIVISION HISTORY:
1962 - County Rezoned property from A to M-1 (447th Z.U.)
1979 - Parcel Map 2817 approved to create APN 941-550-36.
Conditions included improvements to Extension of
Sierra Lane and dedication for cul-de-sac.
COPIES TO: Applicant
Owner
ITEM NO. 3. 1 File PA 88-018
1979 - County Rezoned property from M-1 to PD 1411th Z.U.
permitting M-1 & C-2 uses with development standards
consistent with the M-1 zone (setbacks, lot size,
etc. )
1981 - Tentative Map, Tract 4978, was approved by County for
APN 941-550-40 to 44 to create 15 lots. Conditions
requires extension of Sierra Lane but allow no
access to 941-550-36 until improvements required by PM
2817 are installed.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
Section 1.2 of the City subdivision regulations states that it is the
intent of the Subdivision Ordinance to:
1) promote the public health, safety and general welfare;
2) assure in the division of land consistent with the policies of
the General Plan and with the intent and provision of the Zoning
Ordinance;
3) coordinate lot design, street patterns, rights-of-way, utilities
and public facilities with community and neighborhood plans;
4) assure that areas dedicated for public purposes will be properly
improved initially so as not to be a future burden upon the
community;
5) preserve natural resources and prevent environmental damage;
6) maintain suitable standards to insure adequate, safe building
sites; and
7) prevent hazard to life and property.
Section 8-2.5 of the Subdivision regulations states that Conditions of
Approval to tentative maps may include dedication and improvement of streets,
alleys including access rights and abutter's rights, drainage, public utility
easements and other public easements.
Section 8-2.6 requires that a tentative map must be in conformance with
the subdivision ordinance, zoning ordinance and any other ordinance of the
City.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Negative Declaration
NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the May 16, 1988, hearing was published in
The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public
buildings.
ANALYSIS:
The Applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Map to consolidate 6
lots created from two different maps (PM 2817 and Tract 4978) into one lot
totalling 13.3+ acres. The property is situated east of Dougherty Road and
north of the future extension of Dublin Boulevard.
All of the property is vacant.
Parcel Map 2817 and Tract 4978 required the dedication and improvement
of the extension of Sierra Lane. Final acceptance of the offer of dedication
is subject to the completion of the improvements. Those improvements have
not been made.
-2-
r, r,
The Applicant is proposing the abandonment of Sierra Lane as a public
right-of-way but is including the future right-of-way for Dublin Boulevard
extension instead. The proposed right-of-way is consistent with the Dublin
Boulevard Extension Plan Line. The amount of land devoted to the Dublin
Boulevard extension is roughly equal to the area for Sierra Lane. City Staff
believes that the elimination of Sierra Lane in favor of Dublin Boulevard is
appropriate. The subject property will have sufficient access from Dublin
Boulevard and will not need the additional access from Sierra Lane. The
property north of Sierra Lane will have reduced street frontage, but will
still have frontage and access from Dougherty Road.
Staff believes that the proposed one-lot subdivision is appropriate. A
single lot will provide an opportunity for coordinated development of the
property. The tentative map assists in accomplishing the goal of extending
Dublin Boulevard to the east.
RECOMMENDATION:
FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation.
2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public.
3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public.
4) Close public hearing and deliberate.
5) Adopt Resolutions approving Negative Declaration and
Tentative Map Tract 5900, or give Staff and Applicant
direction and continue the matter.
ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the
Tentative Map for a one lot subidivsion and adopt the attached
Draft Resolutions.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: Draft resolution approving a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance
Exhibit B: Draft resolution approving Tentative Map Tract 5900,
PA 88-018
Background Attachments
1. Tentative Map
2. Negative Declaration
3. Location/Zoning Map
-3-
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR PA 88-018
TENTATIVE MAP TRACT 5900, 5971 DOUGHERTY ROAD
WHEREAS, John Moore on behalf of J. Patrick Land Company, filed a
Tentative Map application requesting approval of a one lot subdivision of
existing 6 lots located at 5971 Dougherty Road, more specifically APN 941-550-
36, 40-44; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , together
with the State Guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that
certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental
documents be prepared; and
WHEREAS, an initial study was conducted finding that the project,
as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this
application; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the Negative Declaration was given in all
respects as required by State Law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the
Negative Declaration at a Public Hearing on May 16, 1988; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
finds as follows:
1. That the project PA 88-018 Tentative Map Tract 5900 will not have a
significant effect on the environment;
2. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in
accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline
regulations; and
3. That the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission hereby
adopts the Negative Declaration for PA 88-018 Tentative Map Tract 5900
application.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1988.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING PA 88-018 TENTATIVE MAP 5900
WHEREAS, J. Patrick Land Company has requested approval of a
Tentative Map for one lot within the Dublin City limits; and
WHEREAS, the State of California Subdivision Map Act and the
adopted City of Dublin Subdivision Regulations require that no real property
may be divided into two or more parcels for the purposes of sale, lease or
financing unless a Tentative Map is acted upon and a Final Map is approved
consistent with the Subdivision Map Act and City of Dublin Subdivision
Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on said
application on May 16, 1988; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearings was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, and has been found to
be Categorically Exempt; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
finds that:
1. Tentative Map 5900 will not have substantial adverse effects on
health or safety, or be substantially detrimental to the public
welfare, or be injurious to property or public improvements.
2. The proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the City's General
Plan and City Zoning and related ordinances.
3. The Tentative Map is consistent with street patterns, rights-of-
way, utilities and public facilities planned for the area.
4. Areas proposed to be dedicated for public purposes will conform to
minimum improvement standards so as not to be a future burden upon
the community.
5. The Tentative Map will not have a significant environmental impact.
6. The site is physically suitable for the proposed development, in
that a soils investigation report has been prepared and includes
recommendations to insure site will be suitable for commercial
development.
7. This project will not cause serious public health problems in that
all necessary utilities are, or will be, required to be available
and Zoning, Building, and Plumbing Ordinances control the type of
development, and the operation, of the uses to prevent health
problems after development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City of Dublin Planning Commission
approves PA 88-018, Tentative Map 5900, subject to the following conditions:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Unless otherwise specified, the following conditions shall be complied with
prior to the recordation of the Final Map. Each item is subject to review and
approval by the Planning Department unless otherwise specified.
PA88-oi8
n n
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The design and improvements of Tentative Map 5900 shall be in conformance
with the design and improvements indicated on the map labeled Exhibit "A"
on file with the Dublin Planning Department (PA 88-018).
2. Prior to approval of the Final Map, a soils investigation report shall be
prepared, including recommendations to make the building pads suitable
for future development.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the recommendations outlined in
the soils investigation report shall be completed under the constant
inspection of the soils engineer and are certified by the soils engineer
as suitable for foundations.
4. An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any driveways for the lot.
5. Address numbers for all development shall be visible from the street per
DSRSD Fire Department requirement.
6. The Applicant shall provide DSRSD with plans showing the water and sewer
services to the lots.
7. If, during construction, archaeological remains are encountered,
construction in the vicinity shall be halted, an archaeologist consulted,
and the City Planning Department notified. If, in the opinion of the
archaeologist, the remains are significant, measures, as may be required
by the Plananing Director, shall be taken to protect them.
8. Each lot shall be so graded as not to drain on any other lot or adjoining
property prior to being picked up by an approved drainage system.
9. Roof drains shall empty onto paved areas, concrete swales, or other
approved dissipating devices.
10. Under-sidewalk drains shall be provided to allow on-site drainage to be
tied in, and/or a storm drain system shall be provided for this purpose.
DEBRIS
11. Measures shall be taken to contain all trash, construction debris, and
materials on-site until disposal off-site can be arranged. The
subdivider shall be responsible for corrective measures at no expense to
the City of Dublin.
DEDICATIONS AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
12. Any relocation of improvements or public facilities shall be accomplished
at no expense to the City.
13. Right-of-way required on Dougherty Road shall be dedicated to provide a
total right-of-way width of 110 feet.
14. Dougherty Road frontage shall be improved to City standards as required
by the City Engineer. Improvements shall include curb, gutter, sidewalk,
paving, street monuments, drainage, street lights, street trees, and any
other improvements as required.
15. 78.5 feet of right-of-way required along a portion of the south property
line shall be dedicated as shown on the Tentative Map for Dublin
Boulevard extension. This shall include right-of-way across Parcel "A"
of Tract 4978. If the City needs to intervene to secure the right-of-way
across Parcel "A", the subdivider shall reimburse the City for all
expenses incurred.
16. All that portion of Dublin Boulevard extension required to be dedicated,
including Parcel "A", Tract 4978, shall be improved to City standards as
required by the City Engineer. The Applicant will not be required to
improve that portion lying south of the proposed median but may be
required to grade that portion to protect the median. Improvements shall
include curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, street monuments, drainage,
-2-
street lights, street trees, the full median including curbs and
landscaping, storm drain channel crossing, and any other improvements as
required.
17. The median shall be continuous except for one left-turn opening to allow
eastbound traffic to turn north into Tract 5900 and one intersection
opening at the existing storm drain channel. Exact location of openings
to be determined by the City Engineer.
18. Storm drain channel crossing for the Dublin Boulevard extension shall be
constructed to conform to its ultimate configuration. The cost for that
portion south of the median shall be reimbursed when collected.
19. Dublin Boulevard extension is part of a proposed assessment district.
Developer shall cooperate with the City in the formation of the District
and agrees to pay his fair and equitable share. Improvements required
under this Tentative Map and not to be built under the proposed
accessment district shall be coordinated with the proposed accessment
district work.
20. All improvement plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer registered in
the State of California.
DRAINAGE
21. The 24-inch water line has approximately 4 feet of cover. This cover
should not be reduced by any grading activities. Any channel excavation
improvements which reduce this cover over the water line may require the
installation of a protective concrete cap.
22. Adjustments to the Zone 7 pipeline appurtenances and the installation of
a protective concrete cap over the water line require an encroachment
permit from ACFC & WCD, Zone 7.
23. No structures may be placed within the water line nor storm drain
easements.
24. Gates shall be installed at locations where fencing is placed across the
easement to allow for Zone 7 access.
25. The Line G-1 channel should be improved to contain the ultimate Q15 (410
cfs) with a minimum one foot of freeboard and the ultimate nn (584 cfs)
without freeboard. A new hydrology study may be required to16e submitted
to determine if the design flows could be revised to reflect the future
land use under the current General Plan and the Alameda County Flood
Hydrology and Hydraulics criteria summary.
26. The side slopes of the unprotected earth channel shall not be steeper
than 2-1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical.
27. A minimum setback of 20 feet from the top of bank shall be provided. No
buildings or permanent structures should be constructed within this
setback area.
28. No surface runoff shall be allowed to flow over the banks. The site
shall be graded to drain away from the channel and collected in an on-
site storm drain system.
29. Drainage entering the channel shall enter through reinforced concrete
pipes and be protected with outfall structures such as shown on ACFC &
WCD Std. Dwg. SF 604.
30. The channel right-of-way should be fenced with six-foot black vinyl-clad
chain-link fencing.
31. A 15-foot wide access road for flood control maintenance shall be
constructed within the setback area and be connected to the proposed
Dublin Boulevard. The access road shall also be graded to drain away
from the channel at a 5% (minimum) cross-slope into a V-ditch or other
acceptable drainage facility. Cross drains should be constructed at low
points on the road.
-3-
32. When Dublin Boulevard extension is constructed, driveways to the existing
channel shall be provided.
33. If a culvert is proposed for the crossing at the future Dublin Boulevard
extension, such culvert shall be a minimum of 7 feet in height and 8 feet
in width.
34. Channel bends and transitions shall be protected with rock riprap or
concrete slope protection.
35. This channel is designated a proposed Special Drainage Area (SDA 7-1)
facility. Under this program the developer would become eligible for SDA
7-1 reimbursements provided the developer enters into an agreement with
Zone 7 before any work is done. The developer must also grant fee title
to the channel right-of-way including the 20-foot setback area to Zone 7.
36. The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map for the City of Dublin (Panel 060705
0001A) shows the project site to be in a Special Flood Hazard Area. The
finished first floor of buildings must be elevated above the 333 foot
elevation.
DUST
37. Areas undergoing grading, and all other construction activities, shall be
watered, or other dust-pallative measures used to prevent dust, as
conditions warrant.
38. Dust control measures, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be
followed at all times during grading and construction operations.
EASTMENTS
39. Existing and proposed access and utility easements shall be submitted for
review and approval by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval.
These easements shall allow for practical vehicular and utility service
access for all areas.
40. A 10-foot public utility easement shall be shown along all street
frontages.
41. All existing easements shall be shown on the Final Map unless evidence is
furnished to the City showing that all parties having a right, title, or
interest in a specific easement agree to its abandonment.
GRADING
42. The developer shall keep adjoining public streets free and clean of
project dirt, mud, materials, and debris during the construction period,
as is found necessary by the City Engineer.
43. All improvements within the public right-of-way, including curb gutter,
sidewalks, driveways, paving, and utilities, must be constructed in
accordance with approved standards and/or plans.
MISCELLANEOUS
44. Copies of the Final Map and improvement plans, indicating all lots,
streets, and drainage facilities within the subdivision shall be
submitted at 1" ® 400 feet scale and 1" = 200 feet scale for City mapping
purposes, one mylar copy and one blackline copy of the Final Map shall be
delivered to the City after the map has been recorded. Three copies of
the signed improvement plans shall be delivered to the City for
inspection purposes. One reproducible and one blackline print of the
improvement plans shall be delivered after "as-built" conditions have
been incorporated.
45. The subdivider/developer shall be responsible for controlling any rodent,
mosquito, or other pest problem due to construction activities.
46. Comply with all zoning provisions, including Zoning Ordinance and
rezoning Conditions of Approval.
-4-
eN
STREET TREES
47. Street trees, of at least a 15-gallon size, shall be planted at the
minimum ratio of one tree per 45 feet along the street frontages. Trees
shall be planted in accordance with a planting plan, including tree
varieties and locations, approved by the Planning Director. Trees
planted within, or adjacent to, sidewalks shall be provided with root
shields.
Utilities
48. Electrical, gas, telephone, and Cable TV services shall be provided
underground to each lot in accordance with the City policies and existing
ordinances. All utilities shall be located and provided within public
utility easements, sized to meet utility company standards.
49. Prior to the filing of the Final Map, the subdivider shall furnish the
City Engineer with a letter from Dublin San Ramon Services District
stating that the District has agreed to furnish water and sewer service
to the subdivision.
Water
50. Water facilities must be connected to the DSRSD system, and must be
installed at the expense of the developer, in accordance with District
standards and specifications. All material and workmanship for water
mains, and appurtenances thereto, must conform with all of the
requirements of the officially adopted Water Code of the District and
will be subject to field inspection by the District.
51. Zone 7 is responsible for enforcement of the Groundwater Protection
Ordinance. Known water wells without a documented intent of future use,
filed with Zone 7, are to be destroyed prior to any demolition or
construction activity in accordance with a well destruction permit
obtained from Zone 7. Other wells encountered prior to or during
construction are to be treated similarly.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1988.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-5-
PA 88-018 Moore Tentative Map, Tract 5900
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR: Moore Tentative Map, Tract 5900
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.)
LOCATION: 5971 Dougherty Road
PROPONENT: John Moore
J. Patrick Land Company
7901 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 403
Pleasanton, CA 94566
DESCRIPTION: Resubdivision of six lots into one lot with dedication and
improvements of public street.
FINDINGS: The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
INITIAL STUDY: The Initial Study is attached with a brief discussion of the
following environmental components:
Drainage and Channel Form
Archaeology
MITIGATION MEASURES: None required
PREPARATION: This Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Dublin
Planning Staff (415) 829-4916
SIGNATURE: DATE:
Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director
PA-8g-018
r. Mooae.
..... . R Tenlb.tive
Mqp
•
•
CITY OF bUUBLlttl • PA No., gg-;of
ENV RONMENTAL• ASSESSMENT FORM, 1NiE2tM
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.)
Based on the project information submitted in Section 1 General Data, the Planning Staff
will use Section 3, Initial Study, to determine whether a Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report is required.
SECTION 3. INITIAL STUDY - - - to bbe"completed by the PLANNING STAFF
Name of Project or Applicant: M'oo(L° t(�Vlka C I`(&G� 9'00
A. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING- Description of project site before the project, including
information on: topography; soil stability; plants and animals;historical, cultural, and
scenic aspects; existing structures; and use of structures.c(al-) qa ca..vi f area
aQQC:A ? -12) IJ Ll , .,.f G LPW W1
OdY '
etc,'" V L) 0•Lt..cY
• Description of surrounding properties, including information on: plants and animals;
historical, cultural, and scenic aspects; type and intensity of land use; and scale or
development. ✓1c�-ll`��� r-( �,^1°i • '� s ��( t-- t
t
lr t (Sr4UA1,, P2t • '0:+,
cue Jt..Q wy>,LA,1 1-o
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS -Factual explanations of all answers except"no" are re-.
quired on attached sheets.
•
E T DTACZS SCALE OF Ii1ACI
NO QUALIE'TFT) YES UIZZICWV
NO
I Cs] l to
E 1 1 —i
• ollola
I 5
t 1`t
t I
1.0 WATER I I
1.1 Hydrologic Bolance Will conetruction of the project alter the hydro- \ 1 I
logic belonce? 1 1
1.2 Ground Water Will the project affect the quality or quantity of I
ground water supplies? I
1.3 Depth to Water Table Will the rate of seater withdrawal change the depth v
r gradient of the wa r roble7 /s
1.E Drainage and amnnel Form Will construction impede the natural drainage pattern
or e alteration of stream channel form?
1.5 Sedimentation Will construction in an area result in mojor sediment
Influx into adjacent waxer bodies? n
1.6 Flooding Will there be risk of loss of life on properly due v i
_ to fioodino? J�
•
A-5
•
COMPONENT -IMPACTS SCALE OF IMPACT •
-.
NO QU• =ED YES UITKNOWN
. NO / 1
•
t I I
' fl
F• •
• ;?;5
1.7 Water Quality Does drinking water supply fail to meet stare end x
federal standards? !
Will sewage be inadequately accommodated and r 1
treated'? X —
Will receiving waters foil to meet local,st.-•a and X
federal standards? '
Will ground water suffer contamination by pefu,e
• seepagys,intrusion of salt or polluted water from •
•
adjacent water bodies or from another cane..+nieored
Jco niter? ,__
•
• 2.0 AIR •
'2.1 Air Pollution- Will there be generation end dispersion of pollutants
by project related activities or in pea<ir.it'.rn tSr
proles which will corned care or r_.v.a e. �/
•
• quality standards?
•-' /�
2.2 Wind Alteration Will structure and terrein•impede proscilirg wind
flow causing channeling along certain corrid eras or `!
•
obstruction of wind movements? •
n
. 3.0 EARTH - -
•
3.1 Slope Stability Are there potential dangersrelated to:lope foil•vre,? k
-
•
3.2 Foundation Support Will there be risk to life or property i_recro of v I I
excessive deformation of materials? X '
•3.3 Consolidation Will there be risk to life or property hecanse of •I i -
excessive oiidotion of foundation emtn•iels7
3.4 Subsidence Is there risk of major ground subsidence emaciated I
with
ect?
3.5 Seismic Activity Is thereerisklof damage or loss resoQbsa from earth- A 1 I .I
qua activity? n
3.6 Liquefaction Will the project cause or be steposed so liquefaction - I I
• of soils in slopes or under foundoti<ns? X I l L
3.7 Fred ibility Will there be substantial loss of soil Can to con-
struction X 1
practices?
•• 3.8 Permeability Will the permeability of soils associated with the I 1 j
project present odversa conditions relative to do- V I I -
velopment of wells? /S
. 3.9 Unique.Features Will any unique geological features be doma3ed
or destroyed by project activities? /�
3.10 Mineral Resources Are thee geologic deposits of potential commercial
voice close to the project? - X_
•
4.0 PLANTS AND ANIMALS •
• \_
4.1 Plant end Animal Species Are there rare or endangered species present? k
Are there species pre_nr which are pa•ticelnrly
susceptible to impact tram human activity?? s
• Is there vegetation present;the!ow of which will .
_• deny food cc habitat to important wildiise species?
Are there oaience species of plant or noimols for
•
which conditions will be improved by the project? )C '
4.2 Vegetative Community Types Are there any unusual populations of pivots that may x be of scientific interest?
' Are there vegetative community lyres which are `_
particularly susceptible to impact from 4srnan ecrivity? /lf"
Are there major trees or major vegetatioe than will -`!
ha adversely oriented by the prajret?
Ara thorn vagaro:i.-e rammnnity typo r-----r.tin In:.
of which will deny food or hoh ite'to i- act.6idiiin•
\,
spec nr too:i m n•stontial nuh of n• ..c vel �C _ _-
4.3 Diversity Is there subsrevriel diversity in the cot•ee:-+r..-xin:y
as
reflected in the number end typo of Wont er erie-el-
species resent or the three-dimensinnal rrratrT'er.-ni
of plant species present?
•
A-6 •
SIT I'2AC15 SCALE OF IMPACT
No QUALTFI -YES UNKNOWN .
NO - I , i •
j 1 t3
01 joro
•
• 6 j j
5.0 FACILITIES AND SERVICES '
5.1 Educational Facilities Will projected enrollments adversely affect the ex-
. fisting or popased facilities in terms of pacing for
all activities,including classrooms,recreational areas, N�and staffing needs?
' - Will the project impost the psp'd/leacher ratio so
as to impede the learning process? NA I I
Is the school located such that it presents*hardship I 1
for a portion of the enrollment in tarn,of travel time, n1 A f I
distances or safety hazards? IsIPL-
•
7
5.2 Commercial Focilitie, Will there be an inadequate supply of and access to " .
• mercial facilities for the project? �(
5.3 Liquid Waste Disposal Are provisions for sewage capacity inadequate for X I
the needs of the project without exceeding quality. standards?
• Will the project be exposed to nuisances and odors v
doted with wastewater*convent plants? /�
5.4 Solid Waste Disposal Is there inadequate provision for disposal of solid '
wastes generated by the project? - X
5.5 Water Supply Is there iradagsntc quantity or quality of water
supply to meet the needs of the project?
5.6 Storm Water Drainage 'Hill storm water drainage be inadequate to prevent
downstream flooding and to meet Federal Stare and X
local standards?
5.7 Pollee Will the project's additional population,foeilities,
or ether features generate an inc ea se in police services '
or create apolice hazard?
5.8 Fire _ Will the pra ject's additional population,facilities,
or other features generate an increase in firs services X
or cote a fire hazard?
5.9 Recreation Will the project hove inadequate facilities to meet NA- I -the recreational needs of the residents?
•
5.10 Cultural Facilities Will cultural facilities be unavailable to the project _ I 1I
resident,? NA
6.0 TRANSPORTATION
6.1 Transportation Facilities Are the traffic demands on adjacent roads currently
• of or above capacity? If not,will the traffic gen=
roved by the project cause the adjacent reads to
' reach or exceed capacity?
Are the other*onportotion facilities which serve the
•
project inadequate to accommodate the projece's X .
travel demands?
6.2 Circulation Conflicts Will design of the project or conditions in the surround- v
ing area in accident,due to circulation conflicts? A6.3 Road Safety and Design Will project residers and users be exposed to increased .
accident risks dun to roadway and street design or lock 1r -
of traffic.controls? /�
7.0 HEALTH
7.1 Ode, Will the project be exposed to or generate any intense •
odors? /�
7.2 Crowding and Density Will the resident,and users be exposed to crowding or
high density in their physical living environment?
7.3 Nuisances Y/ill the project be exposed to or generate factors that
may be considered as nuisances? X
7.4 Structural Safety Will design end proposed construction techniques fail
' to meet,rare and local building codes?
8.0 NOISE
8.1 Noise Levels Will the project be exposed In or generate adverse ^�
noise levels?
8.2 Vibrations Will the poject be exposed to vibrations annoying to
heron,? ,(,
I
CONTX•I Nr IMPACTS • .SCALE OF IMPACT •
NO QUALIFIED YES UNKNOWN
• NO i , —
jII
j ej H
Et
• s, i i5
L I L
~
9.0 CO"M+IUNITY CHARACTER ;
9.1 Community Organization Will the project disrupt on existing set of j
organizations or groups within the community? , I
9.2 Homogeneity and Diversity -Will the project change the character of the j
community in teens of d' 3ution or concentration `, 1
of income,ethnic,housing,or age group? ,h L
9.3 Community Stability and Will the project be exposed is or generate on •
Phy,;coi Conditions ores of poor stability and physical conditions? •
10.0 VISUAL QUALITY -
10.1 View, Will'residents of the surrounding area be adversely x• affected by views of or from the project?
Will the project residents be adversely affected by `,
views of or front the surrounding or.?' n
10.2 Shadows Will Ilse project be exposed to or generate excessive
• shadow,?
•
11.0 HISTORIC AND CULTLHAL •
RE SOU:CES 11.1 Historic and Cultural . Will the project involve the destruction or otter-
Resources at ion of a historic resource?
Will the project result in isolation of o historic x
• resource m its surrounding environment?
. . Will the project introduce physicol,visual,audible
or spheric elements thnt ore not in d.orocter with X
a historic resource or its setting?
11.2 Aohoeo!ogicoi Sates Will the project involve the destruction or alteration —
and Structures of on archacoloiicoi resource? X
Will the project result in soloiinn of an areh000logical
resource? X
Will the project introduce physicol, svol,audible
or atmoiphoric elements that ore not in character with v
an archaeological resource or its setting?
L
12.0 ENERGY •
j
12.1 Energy Requirements Are there potentiol problems with the supply of k
orgy required for the project?
Will the energy requirements exceed the capacity of the service utility company? )f
Will there be o net increase in energy used for the
project compered to the no project alternative? Y
12.2 Conservation Mtasuve, Does the project planning and design foil to include /�`
ovoiloblo energy conservntion measures?
13.0 LAND USE •
13.1 Site Hazards Do conditions of the site,proposed site development,
or sounding o ee create potentially hazardous situ- k
• oboes? _.)_ ,
13.2 Physical Threat. Will the project or the surrounding urea creole o feeling
of insecurity end physicol threat omen.]the residents
and users?
13.3 Sooilcry Landfill Wil!the project be exposed to structure!dmmnge,
noise, surface and g-ound welt,pollution
or other nv sonces ouociorel with o sanitary landfill? X
13.4 Woterwoys Will the project affect an existing wcterway liverish
filling,dredging,draining,culvorting,waste dis-
charges,less of visual quality or ether lend use— X
practices?
•
A-8
•
COMPONENT ZMPACIS SCALE OF IMPACP
• NO QUALIFIED YES UNIZICX,iii
NO r . /
I to
aIIatF
�l� l�1Iot •
ls
•
I � I
1II
Orhe.Envu n I Co�onener.
C. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE QUALIFIED
NO NO YES UNKNOAN
(1) Does the project hove the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish cr wildlife species, cause a •
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important exarnples of the major periods
or California history cr prehistory?
(2) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental
goals?
(3) Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited but cumulateively considerable? (A project
may impact on two or more separate resources where
the impact on each resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.) X
(4) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human �(
beings, either directly or indirectly? /\
A-9
•
D. MITIGATION MEASURES - Discussion of the ways to mitigate the significant effects
identified, if any:
E. DETERMINATION-On the basis of this initial evaluation:
The City of DUblih Finds that there will not be any significant effect. The par-
ticular characteristics of this project and the mitigation measures incorporated into
the design of the project provide. the Factual basis for the finding. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IS REQUIRED.
•
p The City of PLAN in finds that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect
on the environment. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED**
Signature and date: _ (2, Re
Name and title: • p.EN(J L ,TDI�I(r P An1N(rJ�- Re-GTOP
ems ,ry r , D op► -- of road,
4,144wia, . .
DA/ ' wQ-Q4 '(O v1A Q4- 146 FCD ,
**NOTE: Where a project is revised in response to an Initial Study so that po`e:ttial adverse
effects are mitigated to a point where no significant environmental effects would occur, a •
revised Initial Study will be prepared and a Negative Declaration will be required its`ead of
an EIR.
PA 88-018 Moore Tentative Map, Tract 5900
B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - explanation of answers.
1.4 Drainage and Channel Form
Alameda County Flood Control Channel crosses eastern corner of property.
Dublin Boulevard will need to cross channel. Potential impacts related to
crossing this facility are addressed in Environmental Review of Dublin
Boulevard Extension Plan LIne. Road will be required to be designed to ACFCD
standards.
11.2 Archaeology
No archaeological resources have been identified with the site. As the
Dublin area was home to several Native American groups, a standard condition
requires cessation of construction and notification of city in the event
archaeological resources are discovered.
IF.c.
i 1 .1
tcc .-..... ..„
„:.,,,-. ,; [,..„
v;.- n :: ,•.-7 .
' .--.' .., ...: •
'''.---71;! 1,_ ...a. •!.b
2
.,
°,', •! — I 'z
ft i L
-5. , , .;N: •
,:. 1 . . 1.
li ' / : 7 ) ---'..:
I r
, ?
., . 0 : : s......._ ••I ,,,,, t? 1 4 ill' :I
.‘, .
. . . .
, . .
_1 ___
I1%, .72Y1 4 1 f.' •1':,!•:§1
' • -. , ,,,
..;5,-1, ,,/ •,..--,-;,,f' ; .. 1,/,'f•i7-1-
,
_-...... ..e. c: ,
„ .
r•-•.47-, --)\-- /• s
I 1 ..'
,r'l
;rli•' : i nt,
AN/
--:,•;;;:
..'N-
....,•4:
Ice I t.
: •
'
,
'
PralECZ
f/ LOCAMO 0
rir.,:-•4
Fli.
•Ics.F?
j:...*,.
7 •1
c
LI "
vci
.•,-A,
L 'WI
' ,I
.t.. : \
I/
. '..'."'
/
C;1
I:
:I
I: I
:1 I •
V• A:
-.•,I :i 7
I: , • II T,
t.
\t,.2.
--"- .
APART OF THF
n. ,....w. „! ,,, , CITY OF -It SANT1NA . ::-:—•• ZONING MAP
ii• g o lir DUBLIN .4. TH01.IPSON:.c
TIIE CITY OF
.- .X .:' F.
DUBLIN
itirTik pA2B-0 1 3
cHmENT 3 tio6RE..
, i ti31-117)VS
frIAP
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: May 16, 1988
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff nAA•0
SUBJECT: PA 88-029 Baxter's (Grace Restaurant Company
Conditional Use Permit)
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT: The Applicant is requesting approval of a
Conditional Use Permit to allow dancing at
Baxter's Restaurant, 7300 Amador Plaza Road
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: Grace Restaurant Company
2701 Alton Avenue
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: Kathleen D. Sorenson
LOCATION: 7300 Amador Plaza Road
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-305-27
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Retail/Office
EXISTING ZONING: C-1 Retail Business District
LAND USE: Restaurant Use
SURROUNDING LAND
USE AND ZONING: North: Multi-family: R-S-D-3
West: Vacant Commercial Building: C-1
East: Retail Commercial Center: C-1
South: Restaurant: C-1
ZONING HISTORY:
C-3344 - On March 15, 1978, Alameda County Zoning Administrator approved
a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a drive-thru bank,
theater, racquetball courts, gasoline sales, outdoor plant display and
sale and installation of automotive parts and accessories.
S-646X - On April 7, 1978, Alameda County approved Site Development
Review for Dublin Place Shopping Center
ZA 83-10 - On March 14, 1983, the City Planning Director granted zoning
approval for minor building addition and interior signage for Baxter's
Restaurant.
COPIES TO: Applicant
it. Owner
ITEM NO. File PA 88-029
• r-. n
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
Section 8-48.2 Conditional Uses: C-1 District requires approval of a
Conditional Use Permit for commercial recreation facilities.
Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to
determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2)
whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses,
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the
use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working
in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the
specific intent clauses or peformance standards established for the district
in which it is located.
Section 8-94.4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be
valid only for a specified term, and may be made contingent upon the
acceptance and observance of specified conditions, including but not limited
to the following matters:
a) substantial conformity to approved plans and drawings;
b) limitations on time of day for the conduct of specified activities;
c) time period within which the approval shall be exercised and the proposed
use brought into existence, failing which, the approval shall lapse and be
void;
d) guarantees as to compliance with the terms of the approval, including the
posting of bond;
e) compliance with requirements of other departments of the City/County
Government.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Categorically exempt, Class 1, Section 15301
NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the May 16, 1988, hearing was published in
The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public
buildings.
BACKGROUND:
On December 21, 1987, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 60-87
requiring all businesses or persons conducting or holding a public dance to
obtain a Dance Permit from The City Police Department. Although a police
issued Dance Permit was required in Dublin prior to the City's incorporation,
the adoption of the City's ordinance caused all existing dance permits issued
by the County to become null and void on January 21, 1988, the effective date
of the Ordinance.
In an effort to seek compliance with the City Ordinance, the Police
Department provided written notification to businesses with public dancing in
the City, indicating that a Police Dance Permit and a Conditional Use Permit
is required for dance facilities in the City.
The police department notified Baxter's in December 1987 and in March
1988 of the City's requirements. As recommended by the Police Department,
Baxter's representative contacted the Planning Department in March 1988. The
Applicant's written statement notes that dancing has been provided for several
years. A review of the County and City Records concerning the zoning history
for the site indicated that no Conditional Use Permit was granted authorizing
the dance activity at Baxter's.
The property owner subsequently applied for the Conditional Use Permit.
The Police Department issued a interim Dance Permit valid from April 6, 1988
to May 20, 1988 pending the Planning Commission's action on the Conditional
Use Permit Application.
-2-
/"N r1
Analysis
The Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to
allow dancing at Baxter's. Dancing is considered a commercial recreation use
which requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit in the C-1 district.
The Applicant's request concerns the dance activity only. There is no
new construction (interior or exterior) proposed under this application.
The dance floor contains approximately 180+ square feet of floor area
and is located within the bar/lounge area of Baxter's Restaurant.
The hours of operation for the dance activity are from 9:00 p.m. - 1:30
a.m., Monday through Sunday.
Adequate on-site parking is provided as the project site is located
adjacent to a major retail commercial center (Dublin Place). With over 2000
parking spaces available in the center, the retail store hours typically do
not extend beyond 9:00 p.m., therefore the use does not adversely impact the
availability of on-site parking.
The dance activity use is consistent with the General Plan and Downtown
Specific Plan land use designations. As a commercial recreation facility the
use is compatible with the retail, restaurant and commercial entertainment
uses (movie theater) located within the vicinity.
This application has been reviewed by The Planning, Building,
Engineering, Police and Fire Departments. Conditions are provided within the
Draft Resolution of Approval, including restrictions on hours of operation,
requirements for bouncers, security guards and parking lot lighting.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Applicant's
request for a Conditional Use Permit for dancing subject to the conditions
identified in the Draft Resolution of Approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation.
2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public.
3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public.
4) Close public hearing and deliberate.
5) Adopt Resolution relating to PA 88-029, or give Staff and
Applicant direction and continue the matter.
ACTION: Adopt Resolution Approving PA 88-029 Baxter's (Grace Restaurant
Company) Conditional Use Permit
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: Floor Plan
Exhibit B: Resolution of Approval
Background Attachments:
1. Applicant's Written Statement and Application
2. Ordinance No. 60-87
3. Location Map
-3-
I
n ,
•
-
�R STORAGE ROOM
-
fib[ 411;(b ll
LIQUOR STORAGE
�>+..
DINING ROOM t5 OFFICE
• •
yNow Gass-Thai
Now Windows O RAISED LOUNGE
(Alternate) 1- �OOO -._F�+` _ i_uaM�u'.x.
Z--
•
•
O +- O •PIPe Ralllnp DINING S IISERVIE
` D.J.80OrH • , / •• i'r M
Remove Exist, t - ,4 1. 4 W
i _Soffit �r-..M - f ! _
Match Adf. '_ �►'• C
• Sloped Ceiling I .
•.� '\) ( I ;.r a - DININQ..` - ! t. DINNO_• ROOM+2.'- .. --•-1..!` • .,tit`:• •
r(� ..a � .H►� f- .. I, ��', M I. ' • y' it •.i4�•ti.. ^� :' I..,�f: '.1� �, .v•�'Li' .,-1 r ►, v`?,. l
(t Extend Dance Flo ' Atom .4� r+ • -, , .{. •� '.• �1
7! .{-+ --i• II. ' - i 806f�•l�eQ_:r''>rl'1 is'�►I ••)t':xr:,•7j,�►!: ,1 j 1 ..�.I; . .r.r d'' ; ��.�.•,. ;1• 1 r
High Setee wllb 1,' (' II • j t....'�,� �' fi;i
- . • . . I
•
• StandUPIJef. I-• { I• � µi•.L- • 1).0) u� :,i. •• ••�...••r i'.•„t .ii'J� :t 'U''1•1,,% •• - 1` �, `f''.►.j'.' ,
e.
V. : , �� ;/�'r:-;'�,� 1(�Ifa ; '��.�' '+i� I,I73, t> ;,.:i ,,$,,,,�;;,•lh • r ►� `Ar ,..'i';l;• SERViCE :L; ,
�. ..� .,' (1 r►::'. �.�: �I. Gl';� ,i'i `' ^,�� ' J1t:1 :iA1;41t�,hl 71 ���"r•'� r' htrP�, 1�;'� j�: i.
r Or � l..•�.L'� 1 � 1 h''' 1 •�; , i:( -t- -r �. .1�1 ` . 1�.1f r1 r'�.• ,•• ti
'
C (r; • .1 '1 12. S• %� ;, . .,�',Q� ).. ?. 4. 1 .p'.t3 1 1 is �;'1 - ie .�A'.Y:i j-e: ='i.rt. r • . , '
•n r•r1 U. .1`t ?-,• �.. .1. ,� y• 4 i 4�Q ,.d N' ..t r ."•1:' !,(tl, 1'.•4 <. P.=•• tr'r.S:v • -/ 3:
is APR /� f ' .r.: r ; .+, t f -> :C tia7 •
.r !ll_1� - 11 �..'_•1 (� .}•'�, I� n" :S ',�'Q� � ��f1��t. il! e ' � Z
..lXl-- .� •�:Z...=,•(�lj�i '�`.1s� �,EiY��� N� 8'1 A_.S >!•�:, ,C, / / q 1 'tl�•. s {,a:.• TTr '•,• • �V. � . -
l: ' ' �( , ii 1•ray ..-..-,/, !l ',! .''fJ 11:1 .�,. •1 ..il‘
•>. ..,_
J� ,. rt(-) 7t.•,I�l•r . rff•r Q r,..., ,( i:,) '. --'T 1-4 M-.� t .4.i.4,.� ,; • e • . i I' - V Ji� �i ".it:4 t . A • .r p--.• .1y� , -'1 l.{
;'1 t��i 1,r 44 1' •l J :t' ;i., .h _ r>r 4 • }4 - rucrEtT-ti. ,i. {j 1,• Tit ,'(' ., ,.. ) ' • I
I { _ 1 u• .1 .l �' � v 1.•IJ:ii
: ..1. �' h.i; i f C F 1 • . �' f {�(`t:: � r�+)� T,� �l". • � �y� ri •V�1�...� �
I. Y.1.y:-i ,..;/ ;..'l' ... :'r. • ...i ,Y!lr; :!gi.4..&.4.s•( id•, t,,,v.i� } .,, t.1. 66., n.9 , , ..� 'y a ,4y..�"1 14-1•s* i'..:;ii =M,,-. . 3 1, - y'•
•.�:� 'r tI•I'if.t �•�. i;1. 1:
= oar ),1,'�`�: �,tit ,1: S �' '4 Yi 1 t�' 1� �' s`�'t 1e: ") M,+' • ln,� " 4�� ,:�. p r .., 1 ( 1.•
f .i 1` •'1 1. 1 M.. . i . ,•, 1. . ,). 1�. ' t Obit- '. ,- �. rM Lni-:+sti•'�����•' `4
"- 1 Tii• , ' 1 , i ,i!k:t.it`1' fir '� '.', • ;.i.i �r1�it`T tr.i{ w1 ► �trV 1� -�1. , -4 t" .. .� I.I f3 R. , �.v.,r ;L
/I
6217 r i��r`4,Pi..f -T4.1 •J . !.• ,....0 `/wtiii4
;` 41 i• p.. ,• N1• IN 1i+ f+T1re. ''A t „ • 1. ' �t'Cf i�'s r•� 1 • �,.'.�'t j�
. `�l,i`s tr r> •�) �.�. ,.r:(''�Jr'�.:t .1t.^'J •• ' ) ,^ (.>�j! 14 r� , N`h µ r�. yr'>�r ? -• 1 ;�.tiR r f ••1 *.
II`` . j. r t •r• l' t..•, f. yr•., f tr f. •! � •'. e 1 r1 1 - .t n.
;k4/ r. t13.�5�' .�.7 , �► ..., e A it-.j �� :c / r.` bit'
, .7 r �t r. p 14•,1 ;..
,`•a% �4• x I MIg-1042 •;' ti;• ':". r If'' r '• a. 1 if '• !• 1• i • f •4� %�41:1rvi 11 ; gib �'-' '.5 1' 'x.� P. 6 4 • �irs ..ter..
•1 IfJ: r:f Yl '.J ''�' 1l.t .Tir;=r)�y {. 1.� 1 ii' ,7+rT r• ��'u {v'1 . �. 4,� , > , ..• ; Est..
• 11� , '' 1,1
•� . �, ,�,.•' ���� t/ ! � 1h ' r. �� i �•f• 'r1}„ 'f ^'Yr �'t
.� ^` \4;, ii ,,. .� t1 &•`, • , trt.!,'�li
ii.
�f i•l � •qe4. .' �i.9�it•� *i�(�-111 IltI,n f y� +9 / .,, ir' t �11 'r 'l4 . R[+• �y, ` . 1 '1,.w�.�. R'/1 a�,It �'�,$4 .y(i� •7 . ,jI�k1 •,
,4 ' c ' If.). 1 .'':fP_`i l'i ,.t�1Jf . 01. ,:�1 '1;• . ri, $1 ,,.. . . . + ;9 , 1. 1 1�' t: l M 1 A, L.' ‘ f. . 1 i•. 1 kcf,.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING PA 88-029 BAXTER'S (GRACE RESTAURANT COMPANY)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL FACILITY
(DANCE FLOOR) WITHIN AN EXISTING RESTAURANT AT
7300 AMADOR PLAZA ROAD
WHEREAS, Kathleen D. Sorenson, representing Grace Restaurant
Company filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit to establish a
commercial recreational facility (dance floor) in an existing restaurant bar
(Baxter's) at 7300 Amador Plaza Road; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance requires approval of a
Conditional Ues Permit in the C-1 District for the operation of a commercial
recreational facility (dance floor); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said
application on May 16, 1988; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and has been found to be
categorically exempt; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Conditional Use
Permit will not have a significant environmental impact; and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending approval of
the Conditional Ues Permit application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said
reports, recommendations and testimony herein above setforth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
hereby finds:
A. The use as proposed is required by the public need in that
the use provides a recreational facility (dance floor)
contributing to the diversity of recreational facilities
available within the City.
B. The uses will be properly related to other land uses, and
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity, as the
use is located in a major shopping complex in downtown Dublin
on a Major Arterial Street, the proposed peak hour uses of
the dance floor can be anticipated to be during late evening
hours (9:00 p.m. to 1:30 a.m.) rather than at normal peak
retail business hours, and therefore will not conflict with
existing commercial retail uses in the surrrounding retail
shopping complex.
C. The uses will not materially adversely affect the health or
safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborhood, as all
applicable regulations will be met.
D. The uses will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses
or performance standards established for the District in
which it is located, as the proposed uses will be compatible
with the adjoining uses.
IT g
1 A 88 624 08ity s C U? "Prat
/'1 r1
E. The approval of the Conditional Use Permit will be consistent
with the Dublin General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby
conditionally approve PA 88-029 Baxter's Conditional Use Permit for a
commercial recreation facility (dance floor) subject to the following
conditions:
1. The dance floor area shall be restricted to the area as generally
shown on the floor plan submitted with the application dated
received by the Dublin Planning Department on April 6, 1988
(Exhibit A).
2. The permit shall be valid for a period of three (3) years (May 27,
1991). The approval period for the Conditional Use Permit may be
extended two additional years (Applicant must submit a written
request for the extension prior to the expiration date of the
Conditional Use Permit) by the Planning Director upon the
Director's determination that the Conditions of Approval remain
adequate to assure that the stated Findings will continue to be
met.
3. No loudspeakers or amplified music shall be permitted outside the
enclosed building. All activities associated with the proposed
uses shall be conducted entirely within the subject building.
4. All activities shall be controlled so as not to create a nuisance
to the surrounding businesses.
5. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable DSRSD Fire
Department requirements.
6. The Applicant shall obtain a valid Dance Permit from the Dublin
Police Department and shall submit to the Planning Department
documentation that said permit has been obtained.
7. The Applicant shall submit to the Planning Department documentation
that a Alcoholic Beverage License has been obtained from the State
of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
8. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Police Department
requirements including but not limited to the following:
A. At all times there is dancing occurring, there will be at
least two (2) bouncers on duty.
B. On Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday nights and/or special
events there will be at least three (3) bouncers/doormen on
duty in the bar/dancing area to check I.D.'s and provide
facility security.
C. On Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday nights and/or special
events there will be at least one (1) State registered
uniformed security officer providing security in front of the
establishment and/or adjacent parking lots used by customers.
(The number of security guards may be increased by the Police
Department if necessary.)
D. All bouncers, doormen and security guards, while on duty,
will wear identifiable clothing displaying their names.
E. Applicant recognizes his/her responsibility to comply with
Alcohol Beverage Control regulations, specifically, that
intoxicated persons shall not be served alcoholic beverages.
F. During all business hours the establishment is open to the
public, all permits and licenses shall be posted and
available for viewing by the Dublin Police Department.
G. All live entertainment or other amplified sound must not be
audible outside the structure of the establishment.
-2-
h r
H. The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with
lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily
discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or
about the parking lot.
I. Exterior lighting shall be of a design and placement so as
not to cause glare onto adjacent properties.
J. The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free
of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which he has
control.
K. There shall be no pool tables or coin-operated games
maintained upon the premises at any time.
9. Any modifications to exterior lighting shall be subject to review
and approval of the Planning Department and Police Department.
10. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section
8-90.7 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Noncompliance of any
provisions of the above Conditions shall be cause for the
initiation of hearings before the Planning Commission to determine
whether cause is present to revoke this permit.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1988.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-3-
STATEMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BAXTER' S - DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
The project which is the subject of that certain Conditional Use
Permit Application to which this statement is attached is dancing
within an existing restaurant located at 7300 Amador Plaza Road.
This restaurant has been in existence since July, 1980 and has,
under a valid Dance Permit, provided an area within its lounge
for dancing by its patrons.
This use provides a place for people of all ages, excluding those
under twenty-one, to gather and be entertained by music and
dance. It provides a controlled atmosphere for people to meet
and enjoy one another' s company.
The location of the restaurant is within a shopping center and is
not in close proximity to any residential development. The use,
therefore, does not and will not materially interfere with any
homeowner' s quiet enjoyment of his, her or their property.
There is now a need in the City for a use of this type evidenced
by the sales we have realized from our late night business.
Further, we believe there will be a continuing need for this use
irregardless of future trends . Music may change but people ' s
enjoyment of dance will, we believe, remain a continuing factor.
Our establishment provides an enclosed, supervised area for
people to meet and enjoy their recreational time. It provides a
place for people to go after a movie or dinner without disrupting
their neighborhood.
RECEIVED;'
+rnn
DUBLIN PLANN11{0._
hi 1hCIIMENT 11
$8- 02iXS s�L
. 4
•
CITY OF DUBLIN
P.O. Box 2340
Dublin, CA 945Q E C I V E D. (415) 29 1f,fi(�
Planning Department (415) 829-4916
6500 Dublin Blvd. Suite D APR - G Eff. : 1/84
Dublin CA 94568
DUBLIN pLANNII'
PLANNING APPLICATION FORM pp, g$,pc
Notes to Applicant:
* Please discuss your proposal with Staff prior to completing the Planning Application
form.
* All items related to your specific type of application must be cuwleted.
* Since this is a comprehensive application form, sane of the items might not apply to
your specific application. -/b 19 c35- /30 .D 0
* Please print or type legibly.
* Attach additional sheets if necessary. C '.V �r
prK1'Ktt ,4'Sw..e
I�. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER �''��' `d`^ � ��
l H/ PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal
capacity to, and hereby do,authorize the filing of this application. I understand
that conditions of approval are binding. I agree to be bound by those conditions,
subject only to the right to object at the hearings cr during the appeal period.
Name: Grace Restaurant Company Capacity: Property Owner
Address: 2701 Alton Avenue Daytime Phone: (714) 863-6759
Irvi e , CA 9274 ( )
Signature:
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY C;tiEtt: In signing this application, I, as applicant,
represent to have obtained authorization of the property owner to file this
application. I agree to be bound by conditions of a::roval, subject only to the right
to object at the hearings on the application. If this application has not been signed
by the property oc,,ner, I have attached separate dog•, entation of full legal capacity
to file this application and agreement to conditions of approval,' subject only to the
right to object at the hearings or during the appeal period.
Name: N/A Capacity:
Address Daytime Phone: ( )
( )
Signature: Date:
_rl CERTIFICATION
I certify that I have the authorization of the property owner to file this application.
I further certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: Grace Restaurant Company Capacity: Property Owner
Address: 2701 Alton Avenue Daytime :hone: (7 14) 863-6759
Irvine , CA 9271 % ) // ) _
Signature: e: i'!Jr e8
(OVER)
AcHm
?R8gOVi 4ic�cr'c ?Plica�ior
•
llr. GENERAL DATA REQUIRI ID (—)
OAddress or Location of Property: 7300 Amador Plaza Road, Dublin, California
400►Assessor Parcel Number(s): 941-305-27
C. Site area: 1.4 acres D. Present Zoning:
E. Existing Use of Property: Restaurant w/alcoholic beverage sales
F. Zoning and Existing Use Of Surrounding Property:
Zone Existing Uses
- North: Commercial Retail
- South: Commercial Retail
- East: Commercial •
Retail
- West: Commercial •
Restaurant
oDetailed Description of Proposed Use of Property:
Dancing in designated area of lounge within an existing restaurant
(Continue cn separate sheet if necessary)
Iv. TYPE OF APPLICATION
Check type of planning permit(s) being requested:
❑ Administrative Conditional Use Permit ❑ Rezoning
❑ Boundary Adjustment 0 Sign
X.Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Development Review
❑ General Plan Amendment C Subdivision Map
❑ Planned Development ❑Variance
❑ Other:
v. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Planned Development: (See Planned Development Rezoning Submittal Requirements)
B. Subdivision Map: (See Subdivision Map Submittal Requirements)
C. Any Other Planning Permit: (See General Submittal Retirements)
VI. PROCESSING (See_Planning Application Cover Letter)
vli. REFERENCE PHONE NUMBERS
Most questions related to the Planning Application should be directed to the Dublin
Planning Department, however, some concerns might be addressed directly by another
appropriate department or agency:
1. City of Dublin: 2. Dublin San Ramon Services District:
Building Inspection:(415) 829-0822 Fire: (415) 829-2333
Engineering: (415) 829-4916 Water, Sewer, Garbage: (415) 828-0515
Planning: (415) 829-4916
Police: (415) 829-0566
3. Zone 7 - Alameda County Flood Control: (415) 443-9300
:C 1YED
CITY OF Pu13LIN APR .- G PA No. Oa9
T�n��rng�iNN pLANNlNG
Er VIROrJIVIEIVTAL /X S SSMENT FORM, NNNTER1M
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.)
•
The State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines
require the City to take an active role in preparing environ-
mental documents. This comprehensive Environmental Assessment
Form is designed to assist the City in preparing a complete and
accurate environmental assessment in a timely manner and in
conformance with the State CEQA Guidelines. The form has three
sections : General Data, Exemption, and Initial Study. The
applicant is requested to complete Section 1, General Data. The
Planning Staff will prepare either Section 2, Exemption, or
Section 3 , Initial Study. Please type or print legibly in ink.
SECTION 1. GENERAL DATA - - - to be completed by the APPLICANT
1 . Name (if any) and address of project: Baxter 's . 7300 Am_adnr plaza Road
2. Proposed use of property: Restaurant w/alcoholic beverages and
dance
3. Name, address, and telephone of Applicant: Grace Restaurant Company
2701 Alton Avenue , Irvine ._ CA 92714 (71a ) 5:1ti�-F.�nr) -
with applicant
•4. Name, address, and telephone of contact person rcekdition fo-cppl-itent-cr--
Dins�ead oi•appticdm Kathleen D. Sorensen , 2701 Alton Avenue ,
Irvine CA 92714 (714 ) 863-6759
5. Attached plans are CI preliminary or El fully developed.
6. Building area:13 , 00o/+/-sq.ft.
7. Site area: 1 . 405 D sq.ft. orEJ acres. 8. Current zoning: Commercial
9. Maximum Building Height 20 E1ft. or stories.
10. Describe amount of daily traffic generated by number, type an.d time of day:
Vehicles 50-75/day Vehicles 50-75/day
Lunch/Pedestrians ^ 'r ay day; Di r!Peda_str' an 275/per day
11 : 30a . --2 : 00p . ' / 4 : 00 p. -- 10 : 30 p.
1 i . Number of off-street parking spaces provided: 2 , 430 used in common
12. Number of loading facilities provided: 1 dock
•
A ACh . EN
1'p 88-a2413Pociel syeucetkrae.
•
13. Proposed development schedule: beginning: N/A completion: N/A
•
14.a. IF residential: number of new units ; number of existing units ;number of new
bedrooms ; unit sizes ;range of[] sale price: or D rents ; type of
dwelling CI single familya duplex D multiple.
14.b. If commercial: scope of project❑ neighborhood, 0 city, 0 regional
sales area 5 mile EA sit-, 4Q-c-cre; estimated employment per shift 12 ; hours of
ra i s o
operation 11 : 30 a .m. to 1 : 30 a .m.
14.c. If industrial: materials involved ; estimated employment per shift
hours of operation
14.d. If institutional: major function ; estimated employment per shift
estimated occupancy ;hours of operation
15. Describe City permits required: D Site Deve(o g-evi�"v; eL,Ace_;
Actwlivtis-;YaiiVC. CcM.i ticA41 Cts . F -rr 1; ❑ 2e.cl ss at-iicv\(alwr►iv& ;
(_] PIavv€d p2vctoprnewir; eCv‘cu-h00a.1 use_ f?;rrx'rt; [I $ig G+n
Ef o-t l�eY
•
16. Describe other public approvals required: D unknown;Q local agencies;O regional
agencies;❑ state agencies; 0 federal agencies; for None
•
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the information submitted is true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief. I understand that the findings of this Environmental Assessment apply only to the
project as described above.
Grace R staurant Co9?.an •te: /II8, // �� / J�
Signature: By ,
Name (print or type): Kathleen D . Sorensen
y.�•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 60 -87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN REGULATING
PUBLIC DANCES
The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows:
Section 1: DEFINITIONS .
(a) "Public Dance" means a gathering of persons in or upon
any premises open to the public when the main or
incidental purpose for such gathering is dancing.
(b) "Person" is any person, firm, partnership, association,
corporation, company, or organization of any kind.
Section 2 : PERMIT REQUIRED. It is unlawful for any person to
hold, conduct or allow a public dance on premises open to the
public without first having obtained a permit as required herein.
Permit fees therefor shall be in the amount established by
Resolution.
Section 3 : EXCEPTIONS . No permit shall be required for:
(a) Dances held by bona fide tax exempt patriotic,
religious, service organizations or fraternal
associations or organizations (other than college
fraternities and sororities) or held in connection with
authorized school activities or held by senior citizens'
groups .
Section 4: FLOOR SPACE . No permit shall be issued for the
conduct of any public dance at any establishment having less than
120 square feet of dance floor set aside for dancing, or having a
dance floor within 4-1/2 feet of any counter or bar, or stools in
connection therewith.
Section 5 : APPLICATION . The application for a dance permit
shall contain the following information:
(a) The name and residence of the applicant or applicants,
owner and lessee, if any. If any applicant is a
partnership, the names and residences of the partners.
If any applicant is an association, the names and
residences of the officers; and if any applicant is a
corporation, the names and residences of the officers
and directors.
•
-3 7
(b) The particular place for which the permit is desired, or
at which any dance is to be, or dances are to be held.
(c) The written consent of the owner, if the lessee is the
applicant, of the place or premises in or at which the
dance is to be held.
(d) The number and date of dances to be held under the
permit.
(e) A sketch or outline, with approximate measurements,
showing the location and size of the dance area with
respect to any counter or bar, or stools in connection
therewith, and showing the size of the dance area.
( f) The name and residence of the proprietor, operator, or
other person in charge, .if other than the lessee or '
owner.
(g) The hours during which the dance or dances are to be
held.
Section 6: ISSUANCE OR DENIAL OF PERMIT. The Chief of Police
shall , within thirty (30 ) days after receipt of an application
complying with all the provisions of Section 5 of this ordinance,
issue a non-transferable permit with or without conditions, or
deliver to the applicant, personally or by mail, written notice of
denial of the permit, setting forth the reason or reasons
therefor, in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 .
Section 7 : GROUNDS FOR DENIAL OF PERMIT. The Chief of Police
shall deny the permit if he finds :
(a) That any information contained in or submitted with the
application is not true; or
(b) That the requirements of Section 4 of this ordinance
cannot be complied with; or
(c) That the operation as proposed by the applicant would
not comply with any provision of this Ordinance or any
other ordinance or regulation of the City of Dublin
including, but not limited to, the Zoning Ordinance and
building ordinance, or any statute or regulation of the
State of California; or
(d) That, for any other reason, the operation as proposed
would be detrimental to the public peace, health,
safety, morals or welfare or to neighboring property.
Section 8: REVOCATION OF PERMIT . The Chief of Police shall
revoke a permit issued pursuant to the provisions of this
ordinance if:
3�r gg r A
¢ i { �iyr��fi.t`ft� �, 1..-f f ♦6 a W ;y • r \ v
; _sq' ,� _ i,r-4'iir" 'r s 4 . i�j F..j
.rw✓4"'Iiirwr...r..r�..uia,rsiria.s.....i,.. r......�-.. «...•�.,._.... .,. ...r... �._ .. .... ..e�__,�� ...+.a�w. ..._ •+•s_R
N
l
(a) He subsequently determines that facts exist which, under
the provisions of Section 7, would have required denial
of the permit at the time of application; or
(b) Subsequent occurrences create a situation which, under
the provisions of Section 7, would have required denial
of the permit had the situation existed at the time of
application.
Notice of revocation of the permit'. shall be given in writing to
the permittee by the Chief of Police . The permittee shall cease
all operations under the permit within ninty-six (96) hours of
delivery of said notice, unless a notice of appeal is filed
pursuant to the provisions of Section 10.
Section 9: POWERS OF CHIEF OF POLICE. The Chief of Police
shall have the power to stop any public dance or close any '
premises for which a permit is issued under this ordinance for
disturbing the peace, disorderly conduct or for violation of any
law or ordinance.
Section 10 : APPEAL. The applicant or any aggrieved person shall
have the right to appeal the issuance of the permit or conditions
of issuance or the denial or revocation thereof to the City
Council in accordance with Section 7 of Ordinance No. 21-86.
Filing such appeal shall stay all proceedings in furtherance of
the action appealed.
Section 11 : EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE. This
Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30 ) days from
and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of
Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three
(3 ) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section
36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin
on this 21st day of December , 1987, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Hegarty, Moffatt, Snyder, Vonheeder
and Mayor Jeffery
NOES: None
•
ABSENT: None
ilayor
ATTEST:
I-\:/ €( 1\ P C10/L42it
�t ity erk ' lF
• - ^ -
•
SEE SHEET 1A
t ! 1
4,,,e. \\ _-
C ��)._
• . t ^
� �1"f11 .
$ 11 ^� N
u
c�Iq , `
• . ' ..... m P411
..;.2 rol,::ia.... vp
wow mItz; .0. ------nu ....AR M a r ff#S
:: t, I #0*O•% MIIIVWIIIr-N 0'ZS.liraff ...
f1 W 10 . VAIPAO . 1111111.1.13.401‘-lit all ,ff tit.. .
; 1 A ' 4111, 4 W V$V;it:t 1:iir ailik --010,,.
ce\-. ii. 014 .... .w Emb, -
SI
..d
...3 :'
13-2 - - 0. .-\ • sos co-At 'al, ! • ...,,,.;:- '
4.! 0 ~M 'Nt
O I �.
I :w -
\n S; oin -
1110
-p �p _
a
9 7-
, ,.,,7,, -Ls 0.0 \ \L.\ k., 1p
nN.� t.r. .a z H r
1 _ -' ;DN r 0,.:7.
N„,. ,
..,
,________„,..
__ ___ 0,14.
. -7/"---- I \ % I 1/7 . II\ .....
i .,, , , ;/,,, .. ........„ - ,,,�,..,,,,,___...., , ,, \---7 *el „ 5,
••• , , , Pip'
. '••'• -\''', vf 4 t21(1:44%:. NCI, •
n n Ov
, p, I
. ,i
•
\\,,‘,,,,l,\it\
,t, 149A
n
gyp'n 5�, N ...I
c •"'""" i^""'E'm A PART OF THE
44, CDIUTB
F" Sa
Pq
. ,it1. ATTActigNiszci3,
g WOLIN I)cr n 1300[ALIFORNIA ON
158-029
5 nt
n
CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
Planning Commission Meeting Date: May 16, 1988
SUBJECT: Proposed Plan Line - New Road Parallel to and
Southerly of Dublin Boulevard (Between Amador Plaza
Road and Regional Street)
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibits
A) Resolution Recommending City Council Adoption of
Plan Line
Attachments
1) Plan Line Alternatives Map
2) Description of Proposed Plan Line Alternative 1
3) Description of Proposed Plan Line Alternative 3
RECOMMENDATION �-r- Adopt Resolution Recommending City Council Approval of
�j Plan Line
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: No direct financial impacts would occur from the
recommended action. Costs to the City as a result of
development of the road would depend on the financing
mechanism selected for this project. A separate
action would be required by the City Council to
authorize financing the project.
DESCRIPTION:
Discussion
Public hearings regarding the plan line for a road parallel to and
southerly of Dublin Boulevard were held by the Planning Commission on April 4
and May 2, 1988.
At the May 2, 1988, meeting, the Planning Commission considered three
plan line alternatives (Attachment 1) and closed the public hearing. After
adopting a resolution recommending that the City Council certify the Negative
Declaration, the Commission indicated their preference to recommend
Alternative 3. City Staff had recommended Alternative 1 and had not prepared
a legal description for the other alternatives. The Planning Commission
continued deliberation on the item and directed Staff to prepare the legal
description for Alternative 3.
Staff believes that Alternative 1 is preferable. The preliminary
estimate of costs to acquire land, mitigate impacts, and design and construct
the road per Alternative 1 is $3.0 million. Alternative 3 would be more
costly as it requires the acquisition of additional lands and may require
compensation for the severing of a parcel (i.e., the Enea property). The
right-of-way that has been offered for dedication (adjacent to the Enea Plaza
development) was part of a negotiated settlement for a lawsuit pertaining to
the Conditions of Approval for the Enea Plaza project. The preliminary
estimate for Alternative 3 is $3.3 million. This estimate does not include
possible additional compensation for severing a parcel.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Plan Line
Alternative 1 to the City Council. As the Commission has indicated a
preference for Alternative 3, the legal description for Alternative 3 is also
attached. The draft resolution has a blank which can be filled in with the
Alternative number recommended by the Planning Commission.
ITEM NO. 1. ' COPIES TO: Property Owners
File
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISH A PLAN LINE
FOR PARALLEL ROAD SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM REGIONAL STREET TO
AMADOR PLAZA ROAD
WHEREAS, the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan was adopted by the
City Council of the City of Dublin by Resolution No. 55-87 on July 21, 1987;
and
WHEREAS, the Specific Plan contains an objective in the vehicular
circulation plan to develop a plan line for a new street south of Dublin
Boulevard connecting Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on
April 4, 1988, and continued the hearing to May 2, 1988, and continued the
deliberation to May 16, 1988; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance has been recommended for adoption
(Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-026) for this project, as it will have
no significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Staff report was submitted recommending that the
Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the project
(Alternative 1) ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said
reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth; and
WHEREAS, the plan line is appropriate for the subject property in
terms of being compatible to existing and proposed land uses and conforming to
the underlying land use designation and it will not overburden public
services; and
WHEREAS, the plan line will not have a substantial adverse effect
on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or
be injurious to property or public improvement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission
does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the plan line Alternative
as described on the attached Exhibits A and B dated May 11, 1988.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1988.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
gee ® t
�.g - i
RpegWpY
•
4‘ n
_ v�
II .4 ` „ i
4 �� � e e as
r 1,..
ROAD iP�pzt MP =
Ei 1 =
1 k .. c.,3
lac
01 y Immo
1;•A 1 t
m
e
''''Ellal=1110 -- , I
' j , -73 ' V
B 111 ,:::;
I
•
L.14
......./ 1 N 9" &i
1 1 q _ - i ., )
II 1
-- Li
_ zL
i i it,y,
..,t)c
z o
m
m
m � �
iY Cp
1 1 't . .4.
N
1
J
, 4
O
Q
\ 04 2
133tl19 lb'NOle3tl 4 O
1 Q a W
0 I.
W
m� J /'�
zz
1 W J O
J O W ,V\\
_1Q
LL
Q O E.
W
cc � 3
f1c%.
( --
Proposed Street Right-of-Way
SOUTH Or DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN
AMADOR PLAZA ROAD AND REGIONAL STREET
All that certain real property situated in the City of Dublin,
County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows :
Commencing at a point on the west line of Amador Plaza Road on
the south line of that certain parcel of land described in the
deed to Enea Plaza recorded December 19, 1980 , as Instrument
No. 80-224805, Records of Alameda County ; thence northerly
along said west line of Amador Plaza Road 427 feet, more or
less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence leaving said west
line of Amador Plaza Road along the arc of a non-tangent 30.00
foot radius curve, concave to the northwest, to a point on the
prolongation of the north line of that certain parcel of land
described in the deed to Robert T. . & Betty J. Wolverton
recorded December 20, 1978, as Instrument No. 78-248211 ,
Records of Alameda County ; thence on a course tangent tothe
previous curve westerly along said prolongation of said north
line (78-248211 ) a distance of 285 feet , more or less , to the
northeast corner of said Wolverton Parcel (78-248211); thence
westerly along said north line (78-248211) and its prolongation
430 feet, more or less, to a point on the centerline of Golden
Gate Drive , hereon referred to as Point "A"; thence in a
southwesterly direction 380 feet , more or less , to the
beginning of a tangent curve , concave to the north , having a
radius of 966 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 105
feet, more or less, to a point on the east line of that certain
parcel of land described in the deed to Peter B. Bedford
recorded November 21, 1982 , as Instrument No. 82-193550 ,
Records of Alameda County, said point hereon referred to as
Point "B" , lying South 4 feet, measured at right angles to, the
prolongation of the south line of an existing warehouse lying
on said Bedford parcel (82-193550 ) ; thence westerly on a course
parallel with said south line of the existing warehouse 330
feet , more or less , to the beginning of a tangent curve ,
concave to the southeast , having a radius of 332 feet; thence
along the arc of said curve 125 feet , more or less ; thence on a
course tangent to the previous curve southwesterly 130 feet,
more or less , to the beginning of a tangent curve , concave to
the north, having a radius of 266 feet; thence along the arc of
said curve 120 feet , more or less , to a point on the south line
of said Bedford parcel (82-193550 ); thence on a course tangent
to the previous curve along said south line ( 82-193550 ) a
distance of 165 feet, more or less , to the east line of
Regional Street ; thence leaving said south line (82-193550 )
southerly along said east line of Regional Street to a point 68
feet south , measured at right angles to said south line ( 82-
193550 ); thence in an easterly direction parallel with said
south line (82-193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less , to
the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having
a radius 334 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 90 feet,
more or less ; thence on a course tangent to the previous curve,
ATTACHMENT
A I.T82Ni1'r'NE 1 t,tWN. me-co-mum)
MAY it , vise.
northeasterly 130 feet , more or less , to the ieginning of a
tangent curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 268
feet; thence along the arc of said curve 80 feet, more or less,
to a point 68 feet south of, measured at right angles to , the
prolongation of the south line of said existing warehouse lying
within the Bedford parcel (82-193550 ); thence easterly parallel
with said prolongation 330 feet, more or less, to a point south
64 feet from Point "B" , at the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave to the north , having a radius of 1034 feet; thence
along the arc of said curve 105 feet, more or less; thence on a
course tangent to the previous curve, northeasterly 375 feet,
more or less , to a point on the centerline of Golden Gate
Drive , said point being South 68 feet from Point "A"; thence
easterly on a course parallel with the north line of said
Wolverton parcel (78-248211 ) , and its prolongation 735 feet ,
more or less , to the beginning of a tangent curve , concave to
the southwest, having a radius of 30 feet; thence along the arc
of said curve 40 feet, more or less, to a point on the west
line of Amador Plaza Road; thence northerly along said west
line of Amador Plaza Road 130 feet, more or less, to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
•
Proposed Street Right-of-Way
SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN
AMADOR PLAZA ROAD AND REGIONAL STREET
All that certain real property situated in the City of Dublin,
County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the west line of Amador Plaza Road on
the south line of that certain parcel of land described in the
deed to Enea Plaza recorded December 19, 1980, as Instrument
No. 80-224805, Records of Alameda County; thence northerly
along said west line of Amador Plaza Road 167 feet, more or
less, to a point easterly of the prolongation of the southern
line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to
Robert T. and Betty J. Wolverton recorded December 20, 1978, as
Instrument No. 78-248211, Records of Alameda County, said point
being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING for this description; thence
continuing northerly along said west line of Amador Plaza Road
to a point 68.00 feet north measured at right angles to said
south line (78-248211) and its prolongation; thence westerly
parallel with said south line and its prolongation a distance
of 775 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Golden Gate
Drive; thence leaving said centerline, on a course deflecting
5.6 degrees to the right 180 feet, more or less, to the
beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a
radius of 266.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 145
feet, more or less, to the beginning of a reverse curve, having
a radius of 334.00 feet; thence along the arc of said reverse
curve 180 feet, more or less, to a point on the east line of
that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Peter B.
Bedford recorded November 21, 1982, as Instrument No. 82-
193550, Records of Alameda County, said point hereon referred
to as Point "A", lying South 4 feet, measured at right angles
to, the prolongation of the south line of an existing warehouse
lying on said Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence westerly on a
course parallel with said south line of the existing warehouse
330 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave to the southeast, having a radius of 332.00 feet;
thence along the arc of said curve 125 feet, more or less;
thence southwesterly on a course tangent to the previous curve
130 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve,
concave to the north, having a radius of 266 feet; thence along
the arc of said curve 120 feet, more or less, to a point on the
south line of said Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence on a
course tangent to the previous curve along said south line (82-
193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to the east line
of Regional Street; thence leaving said south line (82-193550)
southerly along said east line of Regional Street to a point
68.00 feet south, measured at right angles to said south line
(82-193550); thence in an easterly direction parallel with said
south line (82-193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to
ATTACHMENT_3
At,1eta nus 3 AESGGPnDo
M*,1 it, tile
the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having
a radius of 334.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 90
feet, more or less; thence northeasterly on a course tangent to
the previous curve, 130 feet, more or less, to the beginning of
a tangent curve, concave to the south, having a radius of
268.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 80 feet, more
or less, to a point 68.00 feet south of, measured at right
angles to, the prolongation of the south line of said existing
warehouse lying within the Bedford parcel (82-193550) ; thence
easterly parallel with said prolongation 330 feet, more or
less, to a point south 64.00 feet from Point "A", at the
beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the south, having a
radius of 266.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 142
feet, more or less, to the beginning of a reverse curve, having
a radius of 334.00; thence along the arc of said reverse curve
175 feet, more or less; thence southeasterly 183 feet, more or
less, to the centerline of Golden Gate Drive, said point lying
west of the prolongation of the southern line of said Wolverton
parcel (78-248211) ; thence easterly along said prolongation of
said southern line (78-248211) a distance of 778 feet, more or
less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
A(,TE1214 AnVE 3