HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes 06-06-1983
~ • ~
Regular Meeting - June 6, 1983
A regular meeting of the City of Dublin Planning Commission was
held on Monday, June 6, 1983, in the Meeting Room, Dublin Library.
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m, by Cm. Tenery,
Chairman.
* * * *
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Commissioners Alexander, Mack, Vonheeder, Tenery and
Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director.
f
ABSENT: Cm. Woy
* * * *
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Cm. Tenery led the Commission, Staff and those present in the
pledge of allegiance to the flag.
* * * *
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The minutes of the regular meeting of May 16, 1983, were approved
as written.
* * * *
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
* * * *
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
l. Minutes Adjourned Regular Meeting of City Council - April 28,
1983
2. Minutes Regular Meeting of City Council - April 25, 1983
3. Appealable Action Letter to Pet Medical Service
Also, distributed to each Commissioner, before the meeting, were
copies of the Bay Area Rapid Transit District Livermore-Pleasanton
Extension Study (Update Analysis), dated May, 1983.
Cm. Mack inquired whether there had been a reply from DSRSD
regarding the Base Maps. Mr. Tong responded that there had been
no response as yet from DSRSD.
. • •
Cm. Alexander suggested that, with regard to a future Pet Medical
Service vaccination clinic, Staff might monitor the area of the
Payless parking lot to determine whether or not there is
sufficient room to accommodate the project.
* * * *
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Cm. Alexander questioned the progress relating to the City Limit
Sign for San Ramon Road at I-580.
Lee Thompson, City Engineer, responded that it may take eight to
ten months before the sign can be replaced.
* * * *
NEW BUSINESS
REVIEW OF FIVE YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
A copy of the City of Dublin Preliminary Capital Improvement
Program was included in the Commissioners' packets for their
review prior to the meeting. Mr. Tong introduced Richard Ambrose,
City Manager and Lee Thompson, City Engineer, explaining that they
were present to discuss the five year plan.
Mr. Ambrose, presented a detailed explanation of each of the items
contained in the Preliminary Capital Improvement Program,
reminding the Commissioners that it is the first budget for the
new City of Dublin and, at this time, "certainly subject to
revisions." The total preliminary five year program totals
approximately $7.2 million, with approximately $2.5 million
earmarked for community improvement projects, and approximately
$4.7 million identified for street projects. He reminded the
Commissioners that such a program is brought to the Planning
Commission, typically, because the programs are approved by the
Commission in terms of conformity of the projects with the General
Plan, while the fiscal aspects of the projects are considered by
the City Council.
Mr. Jerry Fritsch, 6789 Amador Valley Blvd., questioned whether
lighting would be provided between Dougherty Rd. and Stagecoach
Rd. Mr. Thompson answered that some of the proposed lights are
destined for that area.
Mr. Jack Beachamp, 11873 Dublin Green Blvd., queried Staff
regarding notification of the public meeting and access to
information regarding the Capital Improvement Program. It was
ascertained that proper public notice had been given, as well as
the fact that pertinent information is available at the Dublin
City Offices for anyone wishing to obtain it.
. ~ •
Mr. Ted Ebsen, 8846 Beverly Lane, asked why only four bus shelters
had been proposed. Mr. Thompson stated that the first four would
be studied to assure the City of their quality and maintenance
requirements.
On Cm. Alexander's motion, and Cm. Mack's second, and unanimous
vote of the Commissioner's present, the Planning Commission
determined that the projects outlined in the Five Year Capital
Improvement Plan conform with the anticipated General Plan, and
recommended City Council's adoption of the Five Year Capital
Improvement Program, with the following comments:
l. Study and correction of the road swales along Dublin Blvd.
2. Consider utilization of low level landscaping, in the
medians, as opposed to trees.
3. Consideration of abandoned school facilities for future City
Hall site.
4. Study and consideration of the tree "fatality rate", with
regard to the landscape program proposed for the City.
* * * *
A short recess was called, after which all Commissioners were
present (with the exception of Cm. Woy) to continue the meeting.
DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN:
DETAILED WORK PROGRAM
Mr. Tong introduced Mr. John Blayney, Planning Consultant, and
briefly described the Detailed Work Program, in preparation for
formulating the Dublin General Plan. He noted that the joint
meeting between the City Council and Planning Commission has been
tentatively set for June 15, 1983, to consider adoption of the
program. He pointed out that, at this meeting, it was appropriate
for the Planning Commission to review and comment on the Detailed
Work Program and to identify any additional planning issues which
should be addressed.
Cm. Vonheeder was particularly in favor of allowing plenty of time
for citizen participation, in the form of committee workshops.
There was general agreement among the Commissioners.
There was lengthy discussion as to whether meetings regarding the
General Plan should be joint meetings between the City Council and
the Planning Commission, or separate meetings, and which method
would allow maximum time for citizen participation.
Since the City Council has directed that the Consultant must have
an "adoptable general plan prior to April, 1984, the "tight time
frame" was of particular concern with regard to finding the time
for the kinds of ineetings and workshops desired.
_ • .
It was decided that a citizen's meeting (workshop) would be held
(tentatively) on July 19, 1983, in order to encourage citizen
input regarding the issues which must be addressed by the General
Plan. Mr. Tong reminded the Commission that the dates set forth
on the Detailed Work Program are still subject to City Council's
compliance. It was decided that any additional citizen workshops
would be scheduled as the formulation of the General Plan
continued.
* * * *
LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON
BART EXTENSION STUDY
The Commissioners were each given a copy of the Bay Area Rapid
Transit District, Livermore-Pleasanton BART Extension Study. Mr.
Tong explained that, at the Pleasanton/Dublin joint study session,
the Pleasanton Planning Commission indicated that they wished to
realign BART from downtown Pleasanton to an alignment along I-580.
Mr. Tong stated that, if the Commission agreed, it would be
' appropriate for them to express general support of the I-580
alignment with the detailed analysis.
Cm. Vonheeder made the motion, with Cm. Mack's second, to adopt a
recommendation in general support of an I-580 alignment for BART
with detailed analysis of station location, pending the update
analysis. The motion was carried by unanimous vote of the
Commissioners present.
Staff was directed to send notification of the motion to the
Pleasanton Planning Cornmission, Livermore Planning Commission and
BART.
* * * *
OTHER BUSINESS
Cm. Vonheeder questioned whether or not action should be taken
regarding the apparent "overlap" of the Dublin and Pleasanton
spheres of influence. She made the motion that Staff direct a
letter to the City Council, over the signature of the Planning
Commission, expressing the concern of the Pleasanton Planning
Commission regarding Dublin's proposed sphere of influence
"overlapping" the Pleasanton sphere of influence, specifically,
the area west of Foothill Blvd. and south of I-580. The motion
was seconded by Gm. Alexander and passed by unanimous vote of the
Commissioners present.
* * * *
Cm. Alexander and Cm. Tenery indicated that they would be
attending the Seminar for Public Officials, sponsored by the
Community Associations Institute, on June 21, 1983. Mr. Tong
stated he mightalso be in attendance and would arrange the
reservations.
. ~ ~
A
Cm. Mack indicated that she would attend the public meeting
regarding the update analysis of the Livermore-Pleasanton BART
extention study, which is scheduled for June 12, 1983.
* * * *
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at
11:05 p.m.
Respectfull submitted,
~ ~
Laurence L. Tong, ~
Planning Director
` Planning Co ission Chairm
~