Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso 87-070 PA 87-096 Denying Minor Subdivision- PA 87-096, w/o prejudice RESOLUTION NO. 87 - 070 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN 1) DENYING THE MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST OF PA 87-096, A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING 7.002 ACRE SITE INTO TWO SEPARATE SITES (ONE CONTAINING 15,400 SQUARE FEET AND THE OTHER CONTAINING 289,607 SQUARE FEET) AT 7450 AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD; AND 2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST OF PA 87-096 TO CONSTRUCT A 10,000+ SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT 7450 AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD WHEREAS, First Western Development filed an application for a Minor Subdivision request to subdivide an existing 7.002 acre site into two separate sites (one containing 15,400 square feet and the other containing 289,607 square feet), and a Site Development Review request to construct a 10,000 square foot commercial building on the new 15,400 square foot parcel; and WHEREAS, since a portion of this application is in part being recommended for denial (the Subdivision) by Staff, and the other portion of this application (the Site Development Review) is being recommended for denial without prejudice by Staff, the provisions of the Environmental Quality Act need not be fulfilled; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said application on October 5, 1987; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Subdivision request be denied and the Site Development Review request be denied without prejudice; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony as hereinabove set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that the Minor Subdivision request in PA 87-096 is incon- sistent with the intent of the applicable Subdivision Regulations, City Zoning Ordinance and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan in that: 1) The subdivision would result in the creation of a landlocked parcel; 2) The subdivision would result in a parcel that would not have the required effective lot frontage as defined in Section 8-60.13 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; 3) The subdivision would result in a lot that would not have any frontage on a public street; 4) There would not be direct access to the landlocked parcel other than directly through a subservient parcel that completely surrounds this landlocked parcel; 5) The subdivision would not promote the general welfare of the community in that it does not assure that it would not become a future burden upon the community with respect to ingress/egress and parking; 6) The subdivision would not maintain suitable standards to insure an adequate building site in that development on the parcel would be hampered based upon the small size of the parcel and the inability to design an adequate amount of on-site parking to make this a self-sufficient proposal; and -1- The Site Development Review in PA 87-096 does not: 1) Promote attractive and harmonious development in that the design of the structure does not fulfill all the design policies established in the Downtown Specific Plan; 2) Comply with on-site parking requirements established in the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan in that no on-site parking spaces have been provided; 3) Comply with the maximum 30% Floor Area Ratio requirement established in the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan, in that a 65% Floor Area Ratio is proposed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission denies the Minor Subdivision request in PA 87-096 and denies without prejudice the Site Development Review request in PA 87-096. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of October, 1987. AYES: Commissioners Barnes, Burnham, Mack and Zika NOES: None ABSENT: None Planning Commissidh-Chairperson ATTEST: Y > 41161/4161/4.-644:1-C-6\ Planning Director -2-