Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Reso 88-001 PA 87-161 Upholding ZA action denying the Good Guys/ Enea Properties Co. sign RESOLUTION NO. 88 - 001 A RESOLUTION OF THE DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION UPHOLDING THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S ACTION DENYING PA 87-161 THE GOOD GUYS (APPLICANTS)/ENEA PROPERTIES COMPANY (OWNERS) - SIGN LOCATION VARIANCE REQUEST, SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD AND AMADOR PLAZA ROAD WHEREAS, Gregg Steele, on behalf of The Good Guys, Inc., has filed an application for a Sign Location Variance from Sections 8-87.33 and 8-87.10 p) and s) of the City's Zoning Ordinance to allow construction of a Wall- mounted Business Sign which is not located on the Primary or Secondary Building Frontage of the retail space which it is proposed to identify; and WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and has been found to be categorically exempt; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator held a public hearing on said application on December 1, 1987; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending denial of the Variance application; and WHEREAS, after hearing and considering all said reports, recommendations and testimony, the Zoning Administrator denied the Sign Location Variance request; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 1987, Gregg Steele, representing The Good Guys, Inc. (Applicant), filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's action; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said appeal on January 4, 1987; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator's action and deny the Sign Location Variance request; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard and considered all said reports, recommendations and testimony as hereinabove set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby find that: A. There are no special circumstances related to size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of The Good Guys tenant space or Building B of the Enea Plaza Shopping Center which would warrant granting a Sign Location Variance, in that the visibility of the subject tenant space is commensurate with others within the immediate vicinity and zone, given Building B's visual relationship to a major arterial roadway (Dublin Boulevard) and collector street (Amador Plaza Road). B. There is nothing unique or special regarding the size, shape or topo- graphy of the proposed Good Guys Tenant Space or Building B which would preclude the Applicants from maintaining a strict compliance with the locational requirements for Wall Signs. The granting of this Variance would constitute a special privilege and may set an inappropriate precedent for similar, future Variance requests. -1- n n C. The granting of this Sign Location Variance would not be detrimental to persons or property in that establishing The Good Guys proposed Wall Sign would create signage of a uniform design and location of that proposed for the remainder of Building A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby deny Sign Location Variance PA 87-161. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of January, 1988. AYES: Commissioners Barnes, Mack, Tempel and Zika NOES: Commissioner Burnham ABSENT: None Us Planning Con on Chairperson ATT T: �/ Planning Director -2-