HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/06/1994 PC Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting - Dublin Civic Center Tuesday - 7:30 p.m.
100 Civic Plaza, Council Chambers September 6, 1994
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
4. ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA
5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS - August 15, 1994
6. ORAL COMMUNICATION - At this time, members of the audience are permitted
to address the Planning Commission on any item(s) of interest to the public;
however, no ACTION or DISCUSSION shall take place on any item which is NOT on
the Planning Commission Agenda. The Commission may respond briefly to
statements made or questions posed, or may request Staff to report back at a
future meeting concerning the matter. Furthermore, a member of the Planning
Commission may direct Staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.
Any person may arrange with the Planning Director (no later than 11:00 a.m.,
on the Tuesday preceding a regular meeting) to have an item of concern placed
on the agenda for the next regular meeting.
7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.1 PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Annexation/Detachment and Prezone
#1 request for prezoning a 1,538 acre site, annexing the
1,538 acres to the City of Dublin and 4 additional acres to
Dublin San Ramon Services District and detaching 1,029 acres
from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District located
within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan planning area.
9. NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10. OTHER BUSINESS (Commission/Staff Informational Only Reports)
11. ADJOURNMENT
(Over for Procedures Summary)
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: September 6, 1994
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff CAL—
v
PREPARED BY: Carol R. Cirelli, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Annexation/Detachment
and Prezone #1
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT: Prezoning, Annexation and Detachment request for
prezoning a 1,538 acre site, annexing the 1,538 acres
to the City of Dublin and 4 additional acres to Dublin
San Ramon Services District and detaching 1,029 acres
from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District
located within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
planning area.
APPLICANTS: Ted Fairfield Clyde Casterson
5510 Sunol Blvd. c/o Castlewood Prop., Inc.
Pleasanton, CA 94566 239 Main Street, Ste. E
Pleasanton, CA 94566
PROPERTY OWNERS: Jennifer Lin; Pao Lin; Dublin Land Company; Clyde
Casterson; Marjorie Koller; Anne Gygi; East Bay
Regional Park District; City of Pleasanton; May Devany;
William and Jean Maynard; and CalTrans
LOCATION: Generally north of I-580 between Tassajara and Fallon
Roads
ASSESSOR PARCEL: See Attachment 6
PARCEL SIZE: 1,538 acres
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Eastern Dublin Extended Planning Area
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE: Agricultural District; Residential/Agriculture/Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND
USE AND ZONING: North: Agriculture and grazing; Agricultural
District (County)
COPIES TO: Agenda/General File
ITEM NO. 1 Applicants
Property Owners
PAGE L OF-
West: Alameda County Jail, Vacant; Public Lands,
Business Park/Industrial and Business
Park/Industrial: Low Coverage
East: Agriculture and grazing; Agricultural
District (County)
South: I-580 Freeway, Single Family Residences
(Pleasanton)
ZONING HISTORY:
The City of Dublin adopted the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment
and Specific Plan on May 10, 1993, and the Dublin voters approved the
Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan on November 2,
1993.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
Section 8-31.0 Planned Development District Intent states, in part,
that Planned Development Districts are established to encourage the
arrangement of a compatible variety of uses on suitable land in such a
manner that the resulting development will:
a) Be in accord with the policies of the General Plan of the City of
Dublin;
b) Provide efficient use of the land that includes preservation of
significant open areas and natural and topographic landscape
features with minimum alteration of natural land forms;
c) Provide an environment that will encourage the use of common open
areas for neighborhood or community activities and other
amenities;
d) Be compatible with and enhance the development of the general
area; and
e) Create an attractive, efficient and safe environment.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The previously certified Eastern Dublin General
Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) including
the May 4, 1993 Addendum and the August 22, 1994 Addendum to this EIR
adequately covers: 1) the general environmental setting of the project; 2)
significant environmental impacts of the project; and 3) alternatives and
mitigation measures related to each significant effect of this project.
ANALYSIS:
INTRODUCTION
On June 27, 1994, the City Council initiated a zoning ordinance
amendment study request for initially prezoning a portion of the Eastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan planning area, generally
located north of I-580 between Tassajara and Fallon roads, to a Planned
Development (PD) District Overlay Zone (see Attachment 1) . Ted Fairfield,
representing property owner Jennifer Lin, and Clyde Casterson have formally
submitted annexation/detachment and prezoning applications. Property
owners within the project site were informed of this annexation/detachment
and prezoning request. A majority of the property owners that contacted
the city concur with the project. The city has not received responses from
the remaining property owners. However, property owners controlling the
majority of the project site concur with this request.
The proposed annexation and detachment request involves annexing the
1,538 acre site to the City of Dublin, annexing 1,542 acres to the Dublin
- 2 -
^AGE OF6
San Ramon Services District (extra 4 acres includes the federal government
owned land, see Attachment 2), and detaching a 1,029 acre site from the
Livermore Area Recreation and Park District. The prezone request involves
prezoning the project site to a PD District Overlay Zone with underlying
residential and commercial land use designations.
PREZONE
The prezoning request is consistent with the adopted Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan land use policies and land use map (see Draft Resolution,
Exhibit B) . Action Program 4C of the specific plan requires that the
entire Eastern Dublin planning area shall have a PD District overlay zoning
designation. Property owners desiring to develop their land would need to
comply with the city's PD District review process. This will help ensure
that the underlying intent of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan is
implemented.
Section 8-31.16 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the separate processing
of the PD District zoning. The initial PD District zoning, or prezoning (a
PD District zoning without a Land Use and Development Plan) , can be
established with land use provisions sufficiently detailed to be found
consistent with the polices of the Dublin General Plan. The second level
of the PD District zoning, or rezoning, would occur with a Land Use and
Development Plan that contains provisions regulating use, improvement and
maintenance of property within the boundaries of the plan. Property owners
are not able to develop their land without both an approved PD District
rezoning and Land Use and Development Plan.
The draft PD District provisions (Exhibit B) specify the underlying
land use designations, and each land use designation's intent, intensity of
use, permitted uses and conditional uses. These land use designations
include: Rural Residential/Agricultural; Single Family; Medium Density;
Medium High Density; High Density; General Commercial; Neighborhood
Commercial; Campus Office; Open Space; and Future Study Area: Rural
Residential/Agricultural. All proposed provisions are consistent with the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use polices. The proposed provisions are
also similar and generally consistent with the city's existing residential
and commercial zoning district provisions.
Interim Agricultural Designation
The Interim Agricultural land use designation allows the existing
residential and agricultural uses approved under Alameda County's Zoning
Ordinance to remain until such time the affected property owners apply for
a PD District rezoning and a Land Use and Development Plan approval. The
regulations and standards governing this land use designation shall be the
Agricultural Districts (A Districts) provisions of the Alameda County
Zoning Ordinance. Also, following annexation, all City of Dublin zoning
provisions relating to legal non-conforming uses and buildings shall apply
to these properties (see Attachment 5) .
School Facilities Condition
The PD District provisions also include a school facilities impact
mitigation condition. The condition assures that appropriate school
services will be available prior to any development occurring in the
Eastern Dublin planning area and this condition is consistent with the
Specific Plan. For example, prior to City Council approval of a PD
District rezoning and a Land Use and Development Plan, all property
developers shall enter into a written mitigation agreement with the
- 3 -
'VIE 3 OF �y
affected school district and the City of Dublin. This agreement shall
establish the method and manner of financing and/or constructing school
facilities necessary to serve the student population generated by the
development. The city's role is to ensure uniformity among the different
property owners and appropriate land use planning. The Dublin Unified
School District and Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District,
including their legal counsels reviewed and support the condition.
Consistency with the Alameda County Airport Land Use Policy Plan
The Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan received a
Conditional Determination of Consistency from the Airport Land Use
Commission of Alameda County (ALUC) in June, 1993. A condition required
that the residential designations within the Airport Protection Area (APA)
be changed to Future Study Area/Agriculture or other non-residential land
use designation.
Portions of the project site lie within the ALUC's APA boundary. This
prezoning request designates the former residential designation of Medium
Density within the APA as Future Study Area: Rural
Residential/Agricultural. The intent of this land use designation is to
provide a future opportunity for studying other appropriate land use
designations for this site.
On August 26, 1994, the ALUC found this prezoning request to be
consistent with the Alameda County Airport Land Use Policy Plan. This
zoning also complies with the city's adopted Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment and Specific Plan, which states that "if, at the time of
prezoning, the residential designations are inconsistent with the APA, the
residential designations will convert to 'Future Study Area' with an
underlying rural residential/agriculture designation."
ANNEXATION
The project site is currently within the unincorporated portion of
Alameda County. In order for the site to come under the jurisdictions of
the City of Dublin and Dublin San Ramon Services District, the site must be
prezoned and annexed. The Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCo) prefers that a city prezone an area proposed for annexation, with
zoning that is consistent with the adopted general plans and specific plans
for the area. Staff concurs with the LAFCo and recommends that prezoning 4
for this project site be adopted prior to final annexation so that the City
of Dublin zoning is in place at the time the project site becomes part of
the city. The City Council would then adopt a resolution for an
application to the LAFCo for annexation. The LAFCo then determines whether
to approve the annexation. Following this will be a separate annexation
process involving the City Council.
The proposed annexation request is appropriate because it is
contiguous to the existing city limits and would allow the city to provide
the necessary levels of urban services. The affected property owners and
local public service and utility agencies have reviewed the annexation
proposal. Several of the property owners have consented to the annexation.
The local service agencies (i.e., Dougherty Regional Fire Authority,
Dublin San Ramon Services District, Alameda County Flood Control Zone 7,
East Bay Regional Park District, P.G. & E., Viacom and the Livermore Amador
Valley Transit Authority) have indicated that they would be able to provide
services to the project site at a level commensurate to the levels of
service that are currently provided within the existing city limits.
- 4 -
:,^� 1-{ OF by
Goals and policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan require
annexation and new development to be revenue neutral. A fiscal analysis of
the annexation is still being finalized. Prior to the effective date of
the annexation, the proponents of the prezoning and annexation will be
required to enter into an annexation agreement with the City. The
agreement will assure that the financing goals and policies of the Specific
Plan are met.
DETACHMENT
As mentioned previously, 1,029 acres of the total 1,538 acre site is
proposed for detachment from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park
District (LARPD) (see Attachment 1, p. 3) . This is consistent with the
Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan policies that
indicate jurisdictional lines should be revised so that the City of Dublin
Recreation Department and other city departments have jurisdiction over all
park land within the Dublin Sphere of Influence, which includes the project
site. In addition, the city recently adopted the Park and Recreation
Master Plan that addresses the necessary park facilities, including
facility financing and operating methods, for the project site and the rest
of the Eastern Dublin planning area. Unless the jurisdictional boundaries
are revised, LARPD would acquire, develop and maintain new park and
recreation facilities in the Eastern Dublin area. LARPD's goals could
conflict with the Park and Recreation Master Plan policies and programs
related to park planning, financing and operations.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff reviewed the prezoning and annexation through an Initial Study
(Attachment 3) and concluded the previously certified Eastern Dublin
General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
(which includes the May 4, 1993 Addendum) with the Addendum to the EIR
dated August 22, 1994, adequately covers the significant environmental
effects, and alternatives and mitigation measures related to each
significant effect of this project. The August 22, 1994 Addendum (see
Attachment 4) provides an update of the city and Dublin San Ramon Services
District's plans to provide wastewater service to development in the
Eastern Dublin planning area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Commission's role is to make a recommendation to the City
Council regarding the Annexation/Detachment and Prezone request, and the
environmental determination for the project. Staff found the project to be
generally consistent with the amended General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan land use designations and policies. Staff recommends that
the Planning Commission find the prezoning to be consistent with the city's
amended General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and recommend City
Council approval of the prezone request. Staff also recommends that the
Planning Commission support the annexation request and recommend City
Council adoption of a resolution of application to the LAFCo.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear the Staff presentation.
2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public.
3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public.
4) Close public hearing and deliberate.
- 5 -
PAGE . OF '
5) Adopt Draft Resolutions relating to the Final Environmental
Impact Report for Eastern Dublin and Addendum dated August
22, 1994, PD Prezoning and Annexation/Detachment, or give
Staff and Applicant direction and continue the matter.
ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following
resolutions recommending City Council approval of the:
1) Eastern Dublin Final Environmental Impact Report and
Addendum dated August 22, 1994 Draft Resolution, Exhibit A
2) Planned Development Prezoning Draft Resolution, Exhibit B
3) Annexation/Detachment Draft Resolution, Exhibit C
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: Eastern Dublin Final Environmental Impact Report and
Addendum dated August 22, 1994 Resolution
Exhibit B: Planned Development Prezoning Resolution
Exhibit C: Annexation Resolution
Background Attachments:
Attachment 1: Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: Annexation/Detachment Maps (3 pages)
Attachment 3: Initial Study for PA 94-030 dated August 8, 1994
Attachment 4: Eastern Dublin EIR Addendum dated August 22, 1994
Attachment 5: Dublin Zoning Ordinance Sections 8-62.0 through 8-62.9
regarding Legal Non-Conforming Uses and Buildings
Attachment 6: Project Assessor Parcel Numbers
- 6 -
r'AnE 6 or 6Y
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DUBLIN
A RESOLUTION FINDING PA 94-030 EASTERN DUBLIN
ANNEXATION/DETACHMENT AND PREZONE #1
WITHIN SCOPE OF FINAL EIR
Recitals
1. On May 10, 1993, by Resolution No. 51-93, the City Council
certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (together with an addendum
dated May 4, 1993) together referred to as the "FEIR" for the Eastern
Dublin project (including the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, sphere
of influence changes, prezoning, annexation to the City and the Dublin San
Ramon Services District, and detachment from the Livermore Area Recreation
and Park District) as being complete, adequate, and in compliance with CEQA
and the City of Dublin's Environmental Guidelines and as reflecting the
independent judgment of the City Council and the City as the lead agency.
2. On May 10, 1993, by Resolution No. 53-93, the City Council
approved the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan.
3. Jennifer Lin and Clyde Casterson have applied for prezoning and
annexation of 1,538 acres of land within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
area and annexation to the City and 4 additional acres to the Dublin San
Ramon Services District and detachment of a portion of the 1,538 acres
(1,029 acres) from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District (all
referred to herein as the "prezoning and annexation").
4. The Planning Commission has determined that no new effects could
occur and no new mitigation measures would be required for the prezoning
and annexation that were not addressed in the FEIR for the Eastern Dublin
project and that the prezoning and annexation are within the scope of the
FEIR.
5. An Addendum to the FEIR dated August 22, 1994 ("Addendum") (see
attached) has been prepared and considered by the Planning Commission with
the FEIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE
Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that it find based
on the foregoing recitals that no new effects could occur and no new
mitigation measures would be required for the prezoning and annexation that
were not addressed in the FEIR for the Eastern Dublin project and the
prezoning and annexation are within the scope of the FEIR.
IInr�A
'P.AGE L OF_I?
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of September, 1994 .
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
Planning Director
a:caro1\94030re2
n n
AUGUST 22, 1994
ADDENDUM TO THE EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/
SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Update of Plans to Provide Sewer Service
On May 10, 1993, the City Council for the City of Dublin
certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Eastern Dublin
General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan (the Plan). The EIR assesses
the potential environmental effects of implementation of the Plan in
the Eastern Dublin area over the next 20 to 30 years.
This addendum serves as an update of the plans of the City and of
the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) to provide sewer
service to development in Eastern Dublin.
Summary of Information in the EIR on Sewage Treatment and Disposal
Chapter 3.5 of Part 1 of the EIR discusses potential impacts and
mitigation measures relating to sewer service, including collection,
treatment, and disposal. As the EIR explained, DSRSD is actively
planning to provide wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal
service to Eastern Dublin. DSRSD currently collects and treats
wastewater from Dublin, and then pumps it to wastewater export
facilities owned and operated by the Livermore Amador Valley Water
Management Agency (LAVWMA). LAVWMA then pumps the treated wastewater
to a disposal facility operated by the East Bay Dischargers Authority
(EBDA), which in turn discharges the treated wastewater to the San
Francisco Bay.
Impact Nos. 3.5/D and 3.5/E of the EIR, as revised in Response to
Comments Numbers 32-21 through 32-23, identify DSRSD's limited
treatment and disposal capacity as a potentially significant impact.
It is unlikely that the current capacity of DSRSD's treatment plant
will be sufficient to treat substantial wastewater from development
within Eastern Dublin.
Impact No. 3.5/G of the EIR identifies the limited export
capacity of LAVWMA as a potentially significant impact. LAVWMA's
current allocation of export capacity from EBDA would not be
sufficient to serve development within the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan area, which would require an average total daily export capacity
of 4.3 MGD-ADWF (million gallons per day-average dry weather flow).
A key mitigation to the above impacts relied on the efforts of
the Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority (TWA). At the time the EIR was
certified, TWA was in the process of planning construction of a
wastewater disposal system to handle flows in excess of the LAVWMA
system. TWA certified an EIR analyzing three alternatives sufficient
to provide such capacity. The alternative which was then favored by
TWA called for pumping raw (i.e. untreated) wastewater north to
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) for treatment and
disposal. One of the other alternatives involved purchase of
additional capacity from EBDA for discharging treated wastewater to
the San Francisco Bay.
rnrodde
— 1 —
by
PAGE or
n
If the CCCSD alternative were adopted, there would be no need to
expand the DSRSD Treatment Plant, since DSRSD would be allowed to
discharge untreated water. However, if TWA were to adopt an
alternative calling for export of treated water, such as the EBDA
alternative, DSRSD would have to expand its treatment plant. The
schedule for such expansion was set forth in Mitigation Measure No.
3.5/9.0, as revised in Response to Comment No. 32-23.
Mitigation Measure No. 3.5/11.0 called for the City to support
TWA in its efforts to implement a new wastewater export pipeline
system. Mitigation Measures 3.5/4.0 and 3.5/7.1 required "will-serve"
letters of developers from DSRSD as a condition of the issuance of a
grading permit.
Update to Information in the EIR on Sewage Treatment and Disposal
The above information summarized from the EIR should be updated
as follows:
1. As reflected in the attached update letter from DSRSD dated July
19, 1994 (attached), TWA has formally transferred to LAVWMA its
status as "lead agency" for the development of a wastewater
disposal system to handle flows in excess of LAVWMA's current
system. LAVWMA has accepted this transfer and will now take
TWA's place in securing adequate wastewater pipeline capacity.
DSRSD, a member of LAVWMA, is authorized to pursue such
additional capacity, up to 12.7 MGD, with or without the
participation of LAVWMA's other members. (See "Second
Modification to LAVWMA Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement",
attached). Thus, Mitigation Measure 3.5/11.0 should be revised
as follows:
"Support TWA LAVWMA and DSRSD in its their current efforts
to implement a new wastewater export pipeline system, which
would also serve Eastern Dublin."
2. The preferred disposal alternative is now export of treated
wastewater through EBDA, rather than export of untreated
wastewater through CCCSD. Negotiations are underway with EBDA
for the purchase of such capacity. All members of EBDA have
indicated a willingness to approve the 12.7 MGD, once the terms
of payment for such capacity are worked out. Out of this 12.7
MGD, DSRSD is expected t^ have 5.4 MGD. With the implementation
of this alternative, DSRSD will nave to expand its treatment
facilities, as set forth in the EIR.
With these minor technical amendments and additions, the EIR will
continue to adequately address sewage treatment and disposal issues in
Eastern Dublin.
i.Ireddm
- 2 -
PAGE . OF4;)"
ty SAN
DUBLIN 1112 7051 Dublin Boulevard
SAN RAMON �' • Dubin,California 94568
SERVICES N� G FAX 510 829 1180
•
DISTRICT 'P 'r•�s`° cf~ slo 828 0515
'ICES D%5
July 19, 1994
Ms. Carol Cirelli, Senior Planner
City of Dublin
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Subject: Information Related to TWA and LAVWMA
Dear Carol:
As you have requested, I have enclosed copies of information provided by the Tri-Valley
Wastewater Agency (TWA) and the Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency
(LAVWMA) related to the transition of responsibility for implementing a wastewater export
project. With the actions on the part of both of those agencies, it is our opinion that no
further significant environmental issues related to sewage export are now present beyond
those identified in the Eastern Dublin and TWA FEIR's.
I am not sending a copy of the TWA FEIR certified by that agency as I understand you have
that report. As you will see, the TWA FEIR treated all options including the option now
currently favored (export of treated wastewater to the west and discharged through the EBDA
system) equally.
It was our intent in commenting on the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and Environmental
Impact Report that the significant issues related to wastewater were not associated with which
agency implemented the project but rather with the physical facilities which would be needed
to implement a project. With the transition from TWA to LAVWMA, there has been no
change in the nature of the physical facilities contemplated. We, thus, believe there are no
new significant issues.
If you have any further questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to give me a call.
Sincerely,
BERT MICHALCZYK
Technical Services Manager
BLM:sjc
Enclosure
The Dublin San Ramon Sens rs District is a Public Entity
F:\user\conley\wp51\michalcz\letter\cirelli.ltr , y'
PAGE OF
DES:dfr 8/10/93 (001/35)
RESOLUTION TWA NO. 93-1
RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING LEAD AGENCY STATUS FOR
IMPLEMENTING HEREIN DESCRIBED WASTEWATER MANAGE-
MENT PLAN FOR THE LIVERMORE-AMADOR VALLEY AND,
UPON ACCEPTANCE THEREOF, PROVIDING FOR COOPERA-
TIVE EFFORTS PERTAINING THERETO
WHEREAS, the Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority ("TWA") has
carried out the duties and responsibilities of "Lead Agency"
under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code
§21000 et seq.; "CEQA") with respect to a proposed Long-Range
Wastewater Management Plan for the Livermore-Amador Valley
(the "Wastewater Plan"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution TWA No. 92-3, entitled,
"Resolution Certifying the Subsequent Final Environmental Impact
Report for the Long-Range Wastewater Management Plan for the
Livermore-Amador Valley", adopted October 22, 1992, this Board
certified the Subsequent Final Environmental Impact Report
("SEIR") for the Wastewater Plan; and
WHEREAS, the final SEIR consists of (1) the draft SEIR dated
January 31, 1992, (including technical appendices contained in a
separate companion volume); (2) a separate document dated August,
1992, containing (i) all comments received on the draft SEIR
during the public review period, (ii) a list of persons,
organizations and public agencies commenting on the draft SEIR,
(iii) the proposed responses of TWA thereto, and (iv) revisions
to the text, tables and figures of the draft SEIR; and (3) errata
sheet dated October 15, 1992 ("SEIR" as used herein includes all
of said documents); and
L
PAGE 11 0E.
DES:dfi... 8/10/93 (001/35)
WHEREAS, subsequent to the certification of the SEIR, this
Board has assessed the feasibility of proceeding with the various
alternatives described in the SEIR for implementation of the
Wastewater Plan; and
WHEREAS, as a result of said assessment, it has become
apparent to this Board that, at the current time, the most
feasible project alternative is that designated, "Alternative
West 2" in the SEIR, which provides for treatment of wastewater
within the Livermore-Amador Valley area with disposal thereof in
the San Francisco Bay via the existing outfall facilities of the
East Bay Dischargers Authority ("EBDA"); and
WHEREAS, further review of the proposed Wastewater Plan also
indicates that a project providing for not more than 12.7 mgd
(millions of gallons per day) average dry weather flow ("ADWF")
utilizing the EBDA outfall facilities is that which is currently
most feasible; and
WHEREAS, the Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency
("LAVWMA") is a public entity established and existing by joint
exercise of powers agreement entered into by and among the Cities
of Livermore and Pleasanton, California, and the Dublin San Ramon
Services District, which cities and District are also member
agencies of the TWA; and
WHEREAS, LAVWMA currently owns, operates and maintains
wastewater pumping and transmission facilities which transport
treated wastewater from the Livermore-Amador Valley through the
EBDA outfall facilities into San Francisco Bay; and
2 PACE t3 Of ��-
DES:df;., 8/10/93 (001/35)
WHEREAS, for purposes of economy and consistency in
governmental operations, the Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore,
California, and the Dublin San Ramon Services District propose to
implement the Wastewater Plan as a LAVWMA project not to exceed
12.7 mgd ADWF in conjunction with EBDA; and
WHEREAS, in pursuance thereof, TWA desires to transfer Lead
Agency status under CEQA for the Wastewater Plan (as described
above) to LAVWMA in order that that agency shall have the benefit
of prior work performed by TWA as Lead Agency and to authorize
LAVWMA to implement the above-described project independently of
TWA's interests;
NOW, THEREFORE;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TRI-VALLEY
WASTEWATER AUTHORITY, as follows:
1. Lead Agency status for implementation of the Wastewater
Plan consisting of a project not to exceed 12.7 mgd ADWF, is
hereby transferred from TWA to LAVWMA and, upon acceptance
thereof, LAVWMA shall assume said status pursuant to CEQA.
2. Upon acknowledgement by LAVWMA that it has accepted the
Lead Agency status under CEQA for implementation of the
above-described not-to-exceed 12.7 mgd ADWF project in
conjunction with EBDA, the manager of this Authority is hereby
authorized and directed to transmit the SEIR together with a
certified copy of Resolution TWA 92-3 to LAVWMA and, further, to
meet and confer with the Manager of LAVWMA to ascertain what
further documentation and other assistance may be provided by TWA
3
DES:df.. 8/10/93 (001/35)
to assist LAVWMA in carrying out its role as Lead Agency.
3. Upon acceptance by LAVWMA aforesaid, this Board does
hereby offer to provide such other cooperative efforts as may be
necessary or convenient to LAVWMA in carrying out its Lead Agency
role.
ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Tri-Valley
Wastewater Authority, a public entity, at its regular meeting
held on the 18th day of August , 1993, and
passed by the following vote:
DIRECTOR NUMBER OF VOTES
AYES: Cathie Brown 1
Joseph Covello 1
Jeffrey Hansen 1
Dorothy Scribner 1
John Stein 1
Ben Tarver 1
NOS: Edward Campbell 2
ABSENT: None � /i)��
l/l/
CHAI and of Directors
ATTEST:
Secretary
15
4 PACE 0' 6Y
Approved as corrected:9/15/93
TRI-VALLEY WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
MINUTES
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AUGUST 18, 1993
The meeting was held in the City Hall Council Chambers of the City of Pleasanton.
Directors Present: Cathie Brown, Edward Campbell,Joe Covello,Jeffrey Hansen,
Dorothy Scribner, John Stein,Ben Tarver
Directors Absent: None
Staff Present: Robert Whitley, David Schricker,Chris McGill
Others Present: Hank Ackerman, Bill Adams,Bob Anderson, Marian Breitbart,
Deborah Crowe, John Hines,Clarence Hoenig, Garry Lee, Peter
MacDonald, Bob Okamura, Chuck Weir and others
1. CALL TO ORDER
With a quorum present,the regular monthly meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority(TWA)was called to order by Chairperson Covello at
7:45 p.m.
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion to approve the consent calendar was made by Director Brown and seconded
by Director Stein. The consent calendar item for approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting held July 28, 1993, and the Accounts Payable Report were approved
unanimously.
Actions: 1. Approved minutes of the regular meeting held on July 28, 1993.
2. Approved payment of $4,001.53 to individuals, consultants,
contractors and vendors listed on the Accounts Payable Report dated
August 18, 1993. (Please see Item 4,Manager's Report,for related
action.)
Page 1 PAGE 16 0 __�y
TWA Board Minutes
August 18,1993
3. TRANSFER PROJECT LEAD AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES TO LAVWMA
Chairperson Covello suggested that adoption of Resolution 93-1 be referred to the
September meeting. Directors Tarver and Scribner proposed TWA adopt the
resolution on the condition that lead agency status be accepted by LAVWMA.
Director Campbell expressed the opinion that transfer of lead agency was a"back
door method"of destroying TWA,that the resolution as proposed subverted the JPA
and that it was questionable whether it met CEQA requirements. He stated that,if the
proposal passed, it would be contrary to the JPA on investments and contributions by
the Member Agencies. Everyone who put the JPA together was aware of how to pay
into it and how the money would be reimbursed as the project proceeded or capacity
allocations were voted upon. He stated for the record that if the resolution passed,
Alameda County intended to protect its interests. Director Campbell added that, in his
opinion, LAVWMA would not meet the requirements of the City of Hayward's
resolution.
The next point made by Director Campbell was that,if the Board voted to adopt
Resolution 93-1, it was in essence giving notice that they no longer intended to
participate in a project with TWA. Director Covello responded that,from the point of
view of DSRSD,that was not true. The course of action may be to do something
different, but TWA's JPA clearly speaks about a variety of projects.
Director Campbell stated that he didn't know how DSRSD intended to vote on the
resolution, but if DSRSD voted to change the lead agency for a project that was
identified and paid for by the member agencies of TWA,it would appear that it no
longer wished to participate in a project of TWA. Director Covello stated that DSRSD
would be voting only to transfer the lead agency status. Director Tarver added that if
transfer to LAVWMA passed,TWA would still be in existence. Director Stein added
that the JPA specifically speaks of a five-year time period for withdrawal from TWA and
that would require a separate motion.
Director Campbell reiterated that,since there are three agencies that might have a
desire to pursue a project and transfer it to another agency,giving it the lead agency
designation on a project that has been worked on by TWA for eight years,it would
appear that the desire would be to not participate in a project in TWA. Director Covello
reinforced Mr.Tarver's comment that TWA would still exist even if LAVWMA became
the lead agency,that the wording of the resolution was clear and there was nothing
else intended or implied.
Page 2 1r.E 11 Or 62":
TWA Board Minutes
August 18,1993
Motion to adopt Resolution 93-1 was made by Director Scribner,seconded by Director
Brown. Motion carried with two dissenting votes from Director Campbell.
Action: Adopted Resolution 93-1: Resolution Transferring Lead Agency Status
for Implementing Herein Described Wastewater Management Plan for
the Livermore-Amador Valley and, Upon Acceptance Thereof, Providing
for Cooperative Efforts Pertaining Thereto
4. RESCIND REQUEST TO EBDA FOR POSSIBLE DISPOSAL CAPACITY
Chairperson Covello noted that this item related to a letter from the EBDA General
Manager in which EBDA postponed discussions about use of the existing outfall until
TWA and LAVWMA resolved the issue of which agency would proceed with the
request. Director Campbell repeated that this reinforced his conclusion that TWA was
not participating in a project by rescinding the request which laid out very blatantly that
TWA members had no desire to participate in a project with TWA. Director Tarver
responded that the resolution spoke to LAVWMA being the lead agency to clear up
any confusion so EBDA would be willing to discuss a possible project.
Director Campbell responded that the action precluded a member agency of TWA from
pursuing a project by designating a lead agency and then withdrawing a request for
consideration for capacity in a project. Director Covello stated that the motion was a
rescission of a previous letter.
Motion to rescind request to EBDA for possible disposal capacity was made by
Director Tarver, seconded by Director Stein. Motion carried with two dissenting votes
from Director Campbell.
Action: Passed motion to withdraw request to EBDA for possible disposal capacity.
5. MANAGER'S REPORT
Mr.Whitley directed the Board's attention to the memorandum regarding general
liability and errors and omissions insurance[Please note that the memorandum is
incorrectly dated March 4, 1993 and should be dated August 18, 1993]. He explained
that the Authority is required to have liability insurance under the provisions of the
JPA. TWA has historically carried two major policies: general liability and errors and
omissions. These policies run from August to August;the current policy expired on
August 15, 1993. Because of recent state law which requires the signing of
acceptance of the fact that the insurance carrier is not an admitted carrier in the state of
California, Mr.Whitley felt it was inappropriate to bind the renewal of the policies
without the consent of the Board.. The quotes received for both policies were from
Page 3 PAC, I8 Or ��
n n
TWA Board Minutes
August 18,1993
carriers who are not admitted carriers in California. The memo(attached)summarized
the two policies. The carrier for the general liability policy has been Nautilus
Insurance Company. They quoted a premium of$2,552.64. Nautilus is a non-
admitted insurer and Mr.Whitley had been unable to obtain other quotes to submit to
the Board for consideration. The insurer for the errors and omissions policy in prior
years was American Empire Surplus Line,a non-admitted insurer. They provided a
quote of$3,767.25. An alternate quote from International Insurance Co.(a California
admitted insurer)is$3,827.00.
Mr.Whitley's recommendation,which required a special added item to the agenda,
was to authorize the issuance of general liability to Nautilus for the premium amount of
$2,552.64 and to change carriers for E&O to International Insurance at the higher
premium of$3,827.00.
Mr.Schricker recommended addressing the item in two stages: first to add the matter
of consideration of insurance to the agenda(a 5/7ths vote was needed)and second
consider the issue of insurance.
Director Stein moved and Director Hansen seconded that the issue of insurance be
added to the agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr.Schricker explained the distinction between an admitted and non-admitted carrier:
Essentially the difference is that under the California insurance code,the admitted
carriers are licensed in California and participate in the California Insurance
Guarantee Association(CIGA). Consequently,in the event of financial instability or
dissolution or the inability of an admitted carrier to provide coverage,coverage is
provided to the degree available from funds from CIGA. Therefore,the issue is one of
financial backing of an admitted carrier. Generally,admitted carriers are
recommended over non-admitted carriers. In fact,the insurance code requires surplus
line brokers to exhaust all reasonable efforts to place insurance with an admitted
carrier in favor of non-admitted carriers. The insureds under law are placed on notice.
That is why TWA received a notice that the initial proposal was to place insurance with
a non-admitted carrier. Director Hansen added that CIGA will only respond to claims
that were admitted to insurers that are bankrupt. The statutory limit is$500,000 plus a
deductible per claim—$1 million each occurrence and a$1 million aggregate under
the Nautilus policy. Mr.Schricker added that in selecting a non-admitted carrier their
financial rating should be taken into consideration.
Motion to engage Nautilus Insurance Company for general liability insurance and
International Insurance Co.for errors and omissions insurance was made by Director
Page 4 PAGE Iq OF 61'
TWA Board Minutes
August 18,1993
Hansen,seconded by Director Stein. Motion passed with two dissenting votes by
Director Campbell.
Director Hansen expressed the opinion that the insurance agent should be directed to
look into admitted California insurance carriers.
Actions: 1. Approved the addition of the issue of insurance to the TWA Agenda.
2. Approved Nautilus Insurance as the insurance carrier for general
liability insurance and International Insurance Co. as the insurance
carrier for errors and omissions insurance. A Supplemental
Accounts Payable Report for payment of insurance premiums of
$6,379.64 was approved.
6. COMMENTS FROM BOARD MEMBERS
Director Stein asked if there was any input as to whether San Leandro had considered
the EBDA letter and what action ,if any,was taken. Mr.Whitley reported that he had
not yet received a report. Chuck Weir of EBDA added that the letter was scheduled to
be on their agenda on Monday evening, but he had not heard what had happened.
7. ADJOURNMENT TO SEPTEMBER 15, 1993
The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m.to the next regularly scheduled meeting to be held
Wednesday,September 15, 1993,at the City Hall of Pleasanton.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert D.Whitley
•
Page 5 pggr?A 6)-
1 I c.:myna AM)nu UNN i nC UPK,INAL MESSAGE"ro US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA
II HE U.S.POSTAL SERVICErjHANK YOU.
LAVWMA October 13, 1993
Item No. 5
TO: LAVWMA Board
FROM: Craig R. Lawson
SUBJECT: Expansion Planning for 12.7-mgd of ADWF Capacity -
Approve Amendments to JPA, Assume Half Participation in
EBDA Outfall Capacity Study, Status Report of EBDA
Negotiations, and Expansion Schedule
At the last Board meeting of September 15, 1993, the Board
considered the attached letter from DSRSD dated September 15,
1993 as well as the amendments to the JPA which were approved by
each member agency earlier that month. The Board directed that
these attached amendments be placed on the October 20, 1993
LAVWMA agenda for final approval, and also adopted the following
staff recommendations:
1. Accept the lead agency role from TWA for 12.7-mgd of
ADWF expansion in accordance with TWA's proposal and
action of August 18, 1993;
2. Accept CEQA work from TWA for expansion planning in
accordance with TWA's proposal and action of August 18,
1993;
3. Request negotiations with EBDA for use of 12.7-mgd of
ADWF outfall capacity, and authorize Committee and
Staff to execute same;
4. Authorize funding of $30,000 for Whitley, Burchett
Associates to provide engineering services for
expansion planning; and
5. Request cash advances of $50,000 from member agencies
for expansion planning, including $12,205 from
Livermore, $16,535 from Pleasanton and $21,260 from the
District.
Approve Amendments to JPA �I
The attached amendments have been approved by each member agency
and contain all revisions adopted by the Board over the past four611
months. DSRSD requested that the Board consider approval of the
final language of these amendments this month and noted in their
letter of September 15, 1993 a "slight variation" between a
a "WHEREAS" clause and Section XXXIII B3. DSRSD points out that
tho nwumnm2e" el.u.. Pro-+iaoo that zi,.oz erg and r1co=onton will
vote to participate in a project depending on the vote of the
electorate in each"n ity's jurisdiction, but to-at Section XXXIII
B3 could be constr—d to permit a representat, a from Pleasanton
2
PACE - 4)-
Craig R. Lawson. U. N. C. Mon Jul 18 94, 12:27 PAGE 3/13
07/18/94 11,57 YA1 51U 484 8238 jUUY/U1Y
LAVWMA October 13, 1993
Item No. 5 (cont.)
or Livermore voting contrary to the vote of the electorate.
DSRSD further noted that this is not a DSRSD issue but simply
wished to bring this matter to the attention or the Cities should
they view it ac a potential problem. The cities and LAVWMA
Counsel have expressed no such concern, and LAVWMA Counsel
believes that any such problem is very remote and does not
warrant another revision and recirculation for approval of the
subject amendments. It is, therefore, recommended that the Board
give final approval to the attached amendments so they may be
circulated for execution by the parties thereto.
Assume Half Participation is EBDA Outfall Capacity Study
LAVWMA's EBDA Committee met on September 23, 1993 with staff to
proparo for nogotiationo with EDDA'a LAVHMA committaa mot. e
meeting held on September 29, 1993. Possible use of TWA
contractors was discussad to ,,,net efficiently complete the
preliminary planning and CEQA process with no such tasks needed
currently. Wnr4-in-r+'n.Jrocc one nine dicouccod with pa.me boing
only TWA's half participation with EBDA in an outfall capacity
study being prepared by Brown and Caldwell for a fee of S25,000.
Because this is work-in-progress which may benefit LAVWMA, the
Committee recommends that LAVWMA assume this participation from
TWA with a not.-to-exceed cost of $12,500, including $8,368.49 to
be reimbursed to TWA for expenses already paid to EBDA by TWA and
$$4,131.51 payable to EBDA. Attached are related correspondence
between EbDA and TWA.
Status of EBDA Negotiations
LAVWMA'c EBDA Committee (i.e., Chair Stein and Directors Covello
and Tarver) met with EBDA's LAVWMA Committee on September 29,
1993 to discuss EBDA's terms and Conditions as set rortn in the
attached letter dated September 16, 1993. This meeting was very
productive and much was accomplished as set forth in LAVWMA's
response to EBDA dated October 13, 1993 as authorized by LAVWMA's
EBDA Committee. This response is to be considered by the EDDA
Commission on October 21, 1993 and by the City of Wayward City
Council on October 19, 1993 after which it is anticipated that
business negotiations will commence by the end of October.
Expansion Schedule
LAVWMA's EBDA Committee directed that the attached expansion
schedule, now in draft form, be prepared with the goal of
completing all tasks required for advisory elections on June 7,
1994 for the cities of Livermore and Pleasanton. As shown, the
immediate critical tasks are reaching a conceptual memorandum of
understanding with EBDA end for LAVWMA to develop policies for
PAGE 3 3 (i+
RESOLUTION NO. 94 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR ESTABLISHING FINDINGS AND
GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PREZONING #1
CONCERNING PA 94-030 EASTERN DUBLIN
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin adopted the Eastern Dublin General
Plan Amendment and Specific Plan on May 10, 1993 and the Dublin voters
approved the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan
on November 2, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific Plan contains an
implementation measure (Action Program 4C) that requires the planning
area to be placed into a Planned Development (PD) District Overlay
Zone; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 1994, the City Council initiated a Zoning
Ordinance Amendment Study for the initial prezone of a portion of the
Eastern Dublin project area to the PD District Overlay Zone; and
WHEREAS, Ted Fairfield, representing property owner Jennifer Lin,
and Clyde Casterson have submitted a Planned Development (PD)
Prezoning, Annexation and Detachment request for prezoning a 1,538
acre site, annexing the 1,538 acres to the City of Dublin and 4
additional acres to the Dublin San Ramon Services District and
detaching 1,029 acres from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park
District located within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area
generally located northeast of I-580 and Tassajara Road Interchange;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to
consider the request on September 6, 1994; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of this public hearing was given in all
respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS, no new effects could occur and no new mitigation
measures would be required for the prezoning and annexation that were
not addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern
Dublin project, and the prezoning and annexation are within the scope
of the Final Environmental Impact Report.
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the
Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the PD
Prezoning and application for Annexation/Detachment subject to
conditions prepared by Staff; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard and considered all said
reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does
hereby find:
- 1 - EXHIBITS
1. The proposed PD Prezoning , as conditioned, is consistent
with the City General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan; and
2. The prezoning, as conditioned, is appropriate for the
subject property in terms of being compatible to existing
land uses in the area, and will not overburden public
services; and
3. The prezoning will not have substantial adverse effects on
health or safety, or be substantially detrimental to the
public welfare, or be injurious to property or public
improvements.
HE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby
recommends City Council approval of PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin PD
Prezoning #1 subject to the general provisions listed below:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Purpose
This approval is for a Planned Development (PD) Prezoning #1 for
PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin. A PD District Overlay Zone is established
for the 1,538 acre site as shown on Attachment 1 in conformity with
Action Program 4C of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. The PD
District Overlay Zone allows the flexibility needed to encourage
innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies and
action programs of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
are met. More particularly, the PD Overlay Zone is intended to ensure
the following policies:
1. Allow and encourage mixed use residential and commercial
development in order to meet specific housing and employment
needs, reduce vehicular trips, and foster pedestrian access
to shopping and employment areas.
2. Concentrate development on less environmentally and visually
sensitive or constrained portions of the plan area and
preserve significant open space areas and natural and
topographic landscape features with minimum alteration of
land forms.
3. Encourage innovative approaches to site planning, building
design and construction to create housing products for all
segments of the community, including commercial and office
structures.
4. Encourage higher intensity development near transit
corridors.
5. Create an attractive, efficient and safe environment.
6. Develop an environment that encourages social interaction
and the use of common open areas for neighborhood or
community activities and other amenities.
- 2 -
PACE A 5 OF 61
7. Create an environment that decreases dependence on the
private automobile.
B. Land Use and Development Plans
Regulations and standards governing the PD District Overlay Zone,
in addition to land use and intensity of use, shall be established in
conjunction with the Land Use and Development Plans which are required
to be submitted in accordance with Title 8, Chapter 2, Section 8-31.0
through 8-31.19 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. No development shall
occur for any property within the prezoned project area until such a
Plan has been adopted by the City. The site development standards
included within a Land Use and Development Plan are intended to ensure
that the Purpose of the PD District Overlay Zone, as detailed in the
introductory section of this ordinance, is met. The Land Use and
Development Plan must conform to the adopted Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan design guidelines.
C. Dublin Zoning Ordinance - Applicable Requirements
Except as specifically modified by the provisions of the PD
District, all applicable and general requirements of the Dublin Zoning
Ordinance shall be applied to this PD District.
D. PD District Overlay Zone - Land Use Designations - General
Provisions
1. PD - Rural Residential/Agricultural
Intent: Rural Residential/Agriculture land use
designations are established to accommodate
agricultural activities and other open space uses,
such as range and watershed management. They are
also established to provide space for and
encourage such uses in places where more intensive
development is not desirable or necessary for the
general welfare.
Intensity of Use: .01 dwelling unit per acre
Permitted Uses:
a. One-family dwellings and farm employee housing for
persons employed on the premises. Not more than
one dwelling unit, other than farm employee
housing, shall be permitted on each site;
b. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the
regulations prescribed in Section 8-60.22 of the
Zoning Ordinance;
c. Crop, vine or tree farm, truck garden, plant
nursery, greenhouse, apiary, aviary, hatchery,
horticulture;
d. Raising or keeping of poultry, fowl, rabbits,
sheep or goats or similar animals;
e. Grazing, breeding or training of horses or cattle;
f. Winery;
- 3 -
.26
�o�
g. Public or private riding or hiking trails;
h. Accessory structures and uses located on the same
site with a permitted use, including barns,
stables, coops, tank houses, storage tanks,
windmills, other farm outbuildings, private
garages and carports, storehouses, garden
structures, greenhouses, recreation rooms and
hobby shops, and storage of petroleum products for
the use of persons residing on the site;
i. Administrative offices for on-site and off-site
agricultural activities which are clearly
ancillary to the agricultural pursuits taking
place on the site;
j. Small family day care homes.
Conditional Uses:
a. Agricultural clustering program;
b. Outdoor recreation facility;
c. Animal hospital, kennel;
d. Killing and dressing of livestock, except when
accessory as specified in Section 25.4;
e. Public or private hunting of wildlife or fishing,
and public or private hunting clubs and accessory
structures;
f. Packing house for fruit or vegetables, but not
including a cannery, or a plant for food
processing or freezing;
g. Flight strip when accessory or incidental to a
permitted or conditional use;
h. Cemetery, crematory, or other facility for the
disposal of the human dead, Pet Cemetery;
i. Hog ranch;
j. Drilling for and removal of oil, gas or other
hydrocarbon substances;
k. Radio and television transmission facilities;
1. Public Utility building or uses, excluding such
uses as a business office, storage garage, repair
shop or corporation yard;
m. Boarding stables and riding academies;
n. Sanitary Land Fill not to include processing
salvaged material;
o. Occupancy of one mobile home by persons directly
related to an on-site agricultural pursuit on a
parcel containing a minimum of 100 acres where
there is no single family dwelling or on a parcel
containing a minimum of 200 acres where it can be
demonstrated that security cannot be obtained by
existing single family dwelling occupancy;
provided, however, that no such conditional use
permit shall be issued for a period to exceed
three (3) years;
p. Privately operated Wind-Electric generators;
q. Community Facility;
r. Large family day care homes.
- 4 -
PAGE_or 6___.
2. PD - Single Family
Intent: Single Family land use designations are
established to: a) reserve appropriately located
areas for family living at reasonable population
densities consistent with sound standards of
public health and safety; b) ensure adequate
light, air, privacy and open space for each
dwelling; c) provide space for semi-public
facilities needed to complement urban residential
areas and for institutions that require a
residential environment; and d) accommodate single
family housing, including a wide range of units
from small-lot and zero-lot line units to large-
lot estate units.
Intensity of Use: .9 - 6.0 dwelling units per acre
Permitted Uses:
a. One-family dwellings;
b. Field crop, orchard, garden;
c. Accessory structures located on the same site with
a permitted use, including private garages and
carports, storehouse, garden structures,
greenhouses, recreation rooms and hobby areas
within an enclosed structure;
d. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the
regulations prescribed in Section 8-60.22 of the
Zoning Ordinance;
e. Small family day care homes.
Conditional Uses:
a. Public and semi-public facilities;
b. Community facilities;
c. Community clubhouse;
d. Parking lot, only when established to fulfill the
residential parking requirements of this chapter
for a use on an abutting lot or lots:
e. Plant nursery or greenhouse used only for the
cultivation and wholesale of plant material
(wholesale only) ;
f. Medical or residential care facility (7 or more
clients).
g. Large family day care homes;
h. Second Units.
3. PD - Medium Density
Intent: Medium Density land use designations are
established to: a) reserve appropriately located
areas for family living in a variety of types of
dwellings at a reasonable range of population
densities consistent with sound standards of
public health and safety; b) preserve as many as
- 5 -
PAGE 28 O
possible of the desirable characteristics of the
one-family residential district while permitting
higher population densities; c) ensure adequate
light, air, privacy and open space for each
dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and
avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing
the construction of buildings of excessive size in
relation to the land around them; e) provide
necessary space for off-street parking of
automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street
loading of trucks; and f) protect residential
properties from the hazards, noise and congestion
created by commercial and industrial traffic.
Intensity: 6.1 - 14.0 dwelling units per acre
Permitted Uses:
a. One-family dwellings;
b. Multi-family dwellings;
c. Combinations of attached or detached dwellings,
zero-lot line units, duplexes, townhouses, multi-
family dwellings;
d. Nursing homes for not more than three patients;
e. Accessory structures and uses located on the same
site as a permitted use.
Conditional Uses:
a. Public and semi-public facilities;
b. Community facilities;
c. Community Clubhouse;
d. Parking Lot, as regulated in Section 8-26.3(c) of
the Zoning Ordinance;
e. Plant nursery or greenhouse used only for the
cultivation of plant materials (wholesale only);
f. Medical or Residential Care Facility (7 or more);
g. Hospital in Districts requiring not more than
fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet of Building
Site area per Dwelling Unit;
h. Accessory structures and uses located on the same
site as a conditional use;
i. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the
regulations prescribed in Section 8-60.22 of the
Zoning Ordinance;
j. Large family day care homes;
k. Bed and Breakfast Inns;
1. Mobilehome Parks, as regulated by Article 5 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
4. PD - Medium High Density
Intent: Medium High Density land use designations are
established to: a) reserve appropriately located
areas for family living in a variety of types of
dwellings at a reasonable range of population
densities consistent with sound standards of
- 6 -
public health and safety; b) preserve as many as
possible of the desirable characteristics of the
one-family residential district while permitting
higher population densities; c) ensure adequate
light, air, privacy and open space for each
dwelling unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and
avoid the overloading of utilities by preventing
the construction of buildings of excessive size in
relation to the land around them; e) provide
necessary space for off-street parking of
automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street
loading of trucks; and f) protect residential
properties from the hazards, noise and congestion
created by commercial and industrial traffic.
Intensity of Use: 14.1 - 25.0 dwelling units per acre
Permitted Uses:
a. Multi-family dwellings;
b. Combination of apartments, condominiums,
townhouses;
c. Nursing homes for not more than three patients;
d. Accessory structures and uses located on the same
site as a permitted use.
Conditional Use:
a. Public and semi-public facilities;
b. Community facilities;
c. Community Clubhouse;
d. Parking Lot, as regulated in Section 8-26.3(c) of
the Zoning Ordinance;
e. Plant nursery or greenhouse used only for the
cultivation of plant materials (wholesale only);
f. Medical or Residential Care Facility (7 or more);
g. Hospital in Districts requiring not more than
fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet of Building
Site area per Dwelling Unit;
h. Accessory structures and uses located on the same
site as a conditional use;
i. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the
regulations prescribed in Section 8-60.22 of the
Zoning Ordinance;
j. Large family day care homes;
k. Bed and Breakfast Inns;
1. Mobilehome Parks, as regulated by Article 5 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
5. PD - High Density
Intent: High Density land use designations are established
to: a) reserve appropriately located areas for
family living in a variety of types of dwellings
at a reasonable range of population densities
consistent with sound standards of public health
and safety; b) preserve as many as possible of the
- 7 -
-Anr 3a or
desirable characteristics of the one-family
residential district while permitting higher
population densities; c) ensure adequate light,
air, privacy and open space for each dwelling
unit; d) minimize traffic congestion and avoid the
overloading of utilities by preventing the
construction of buildings of excessive size in
relation to the land around them; e) provide
necessary space for off-street parking of
automobiles and, where appropriate, for off-street
loading of trucks; and f) protect residential
properties from the hazards, noise and congestion
created by commercial and industrial traffic.
Intensity of Use: 25.1+ dwelling units per acre
Permitted Uses:
a. Multi-family dwellings;
b. Combination of apartments and condominiums;
c. Nursing homes for not more than three patients;
d. Accessory structures and uses located on the same
site as a permitted use.
Conditional Uses:
a. Public and semi-public facilities;
b. Community facilities;
c. Community Clubhouse;
d. Parking Lot, as regulated in Section 8-26.3(c) of
the Zoning Ordinance;
e. Plant nursery or greenhouse used only for the
cultivation of plant materials (wholesale only);
f. Medical or Residential Care Facility (7 or more);
g. Hospital in Districts requiring not more than
fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet of Building
Site area per Dwelling Unit;
h. Accessory structures and uses located on the same
site as a conditional use;
i. Home occupations conducted in accordance with the
regulations prescribed in Section 8-60.22 of the
Zoning Ordinance;
j. Large family day care homes;
k. Bed and Breakfast Inns;
1. Mobilehome Parks, as regulated by Article 5 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
6. PD - General Commercial
Intent: General Commercial land use designations are
established to: a) accommodate a range of
regional-serving and community-serving retail and
mixed use projects incorporating retail, service
and/or office uses with residential uses when
location and design ensure compatibility; b)
provide appropriately located areas for retail
stores, offices, service establishments, amusement
- 8 -
4AGc 3) Oi 6Y
establishments, and wholesale businesses, offering
commodities and services required by residents of
the city and its surrounding market area; c)
provide opportunities for retail stores, offices,
service establishments, amusement establishments,
and wholesale businesses to concentrate for the
convenience of the public and in mutually
beneficial relationship to each other; d) provide
space for community facilities and institutions
that appropriately may be located in commercial
areas; d) provide adequate space to meet the needs
of modern commercial development, including off-
street parking and truck loading areas; and e)
minimize traffic congestion and to avoid
overloading of utilities by preventing the
construction of buildings of excessive size in
relation to the amount of land around them.
Intensity of Use: .20 - .60 Floor Area Ratio
Permitted Uses:
a. Community-serving retail uses including, but not
limited to:
1. General Merchandise Store
2. Discount/Warehouse Retail Store
3. Clothing/Fashion Store
4. Shoe Store
5. Home Furnishing Store
6. Office Supply Store
7. Home Appliance/Electronics Store
8. Home Improvement/Hardware Store
9. Music Store
10. Hobby/Special Interest Store
11. Gifts/Specialty Store
12. Jewelry and Cosmetic Store
13. Drug Store
14. Auto Parts Store
15. Toy Store
16. Book Store
17. Pet Supplies Store
18. Sporting Goods Store
19. Grocery/Food Store
b. Regionally-oriented, high volume, retail uses
including, but not limited to:
1) Discount centers;
2) Promotional centers;
3) Home improvement centers;
4) Factory stores;
5) Furniture outlets.
c. Office and service establishments including, but
not limited to:
- 9 -
PAGE- OF �}
1) Bank/Savings and Loan
2) Real Estate/Title Office
3) Travel Agent
4) Legal
5) Accounting
6) Medical and Dental
7) Optometrist
8) Architect
9) Employment Agency
10) Hair/Beauty Salon
11) Cleaner and Dryer
12) Shoe Repair
13) Key Shop
14) Tailor
15) Athletic Club
16) Formal Wear/Rental
17) Other Administrative and Professional Office
18) Technology Access center
19) Tele-Commuting Center
d) Hotels and Motels;
e) Recreational and Cultural Facilities;
f) Eating, Drinking and Entertainment establishments,
including, but not limited to:
1) Restaurant
2) Delicatessen
3) Specialty Food
4) Bakery
5) Ice Cream Shop
6) Sandwich Shop
7) Video Rentals
Conditional Uses:
a. Attached and detached dwellings at densities
established for the Medium, Medium High and High
density land use designations;
b. Auto Malls;
c. Hospital;
d. Animal Hospital, Kennel;
e. Mortuary;
f. Public and semi-public facilities;
g. Community Facility;
h. Service Station, Type A and Type B;
i. Automobile, camper, boat and trailer sales,
storage or rental lot;
j. Plant nursery including the sale of landscaping
materials, excluding wet-mix concrete sales,
providing all equipment, supplies and merchandise
other than plant materials are kept within a
completely enclosed building;
k. Adult Entertainment Activity, provided however,
that no Adult Entertainment Activity shall be
- 10 -
33 � 61
r
located closer than 1,000 feet to the boundary of
any residential zone or closer than 1,000 feet to
any other Adult Entertainment activity;
1. In-patient and out-patient health facilities as
licensed by the Sate Department of Health
Services;
m. Wine or liquor bar with on-sale liquor license
n. Micro-brewery
o. Nightclub
p. Indoor movie theater
q. Video Arcade
r Drive-thru Facilities, including restaurants
s. Other uses that could possibly meet the intent of
the General Commercial land use designation.
7. PD - Neighborhood Commercial
Intent: Neighborhood Commercial land use designations are
established to: a) provide for the creation of
community-oriented and neighborhood-oriented
commercial centers to serve local retail, service
and entertainment needs; and b) provide for mixed-
use projects incorporating combinations of
commercial, service, office and/or residential
uses.
Intensity of Use: .25 - .60 Floor Area Ratio
Permitted Uses:
a. Office and Service establishments identified as
permitted uses under the General Commercial zoning
designation;
b. Community-Serving retail uses identified as
permitted uses under the General Commercial zoning
designation and typically in shopping centers with
less than 300,000 square feet of gross leasable
area;
c. Eating, drinking and entertainment establishments
identified as permitted uses under the General
Commercial zoning designation;
d. Recreational and cultural facilities.
Conditional Uses:
a. Attached and detached dwellings at densities
established for the Medium, Medium High and High
density land use designations;
b. Hotels and Bed and Breakfast Inns;
c. Public and semi-public facilities;
d. Community facilities;
e. Animal Hospital, Kennel;
f. Service Station, Type A, or a facility retailing
automotive parts and supplies which are installed
and serviced on the site but does not include
engine, transmission or differential rebuilding or
body repair;
- 11 -
PAGE 3k or 6y
g. Plant nursery including the sale of landscaping
materials, excluding wet-mix concrete sales
providing all equipment supplies, and merchandise
other than plant materials are kept within a
completely enclosed building;
h. Massage Establishment;
i. Recycling Centers, when operated in conjunction
with a Permitted Use on the same premises;
j. In-patient and out-patient health facilities as
licensed by the State Department of Health
Services;
k. Fortunetelling;
1. Other uses that could possible meet the intent of
the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation.
8. PD - Campus Office
Intent: Campus Office land use designations are
established to provide an attractive, campus-like
setting for office and other non-retail commercial
uses that do not generate nuisances related to
emissions, noise, odors or outdoor storage and
operations. Under certain circumstances, they are
also established to allow residential uses as part
of a master-planned mixed use development where a
mixed-use development would decrease potential
traffic generation and/or contribute to greater
social interaction and more vital live/work
environment.
Intensity of Use: .35 - .60 Floor Area Ratio
Permitted Uses:
a. Professional and Administrative offices;
b. Administrative headquarters;
c. Research and development
d. Business and commercial services;
e. Limited light manufacturing, assembly, warehousing
and distribution activities;
f. Ancillary uses which provide support services to
businesses and employees including, but not
limited to, restaurants, gas stations, convenience
shopping, copying services, blueprinting, printing
and branch banks.
Conditional Uses:
a. Attached and detached dwellings at densities
established for the Medium, Medium High and High
density land use designations. Residential
development shall not be permitted to occupy more
than fifty percent (50%) of the developed area;
b. Public and semi-public facilities;
c. Other uses that could possibly meet the intent of
this campus office land use designation.
- 12 -
PAGE 5 OF 6?
9. PD - Future Study Area: Rural Residential/Agricultural
Intent: The Rural Residential/Agricultural land use
designation is established to accommodate uses
permitted under the Rural Residential/Agricultural
and Open Space land use designations and also
provides for the future study of land use
designations to determine the most appropriate use
for these lands prior to future PD rezoning of the
property.
Intensity of Use: .01 dwelling unit per acre
Permitted Uses: All permitted uses listed under the Rural
Residential/Agricultural land use
designation.
Conditional Uses: All conditionally permitted uses listed
under the Rural Residential/Agricultural
land use designation.
E. Interim Agriculture Designation
Intent: Interim agricultural designations shall be established
for the entire PA 94-030 project area. This interim
land use designation allows the existing residential
and agricultural uses approved under Alameda County's
Zoning Ordinance to remain until such time the
landowners of these parcels apply for a PD rezoning,
accompanied with a Land Use and Development Plan in
accordance with Sections 8-31.0 through 8-31.19 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Regulations and Standards Governing the Interim
Agricultural Zoning Designation:
a. As specifically provided by the Interim
Agricultural Designation, all applicable and
general requirements of the Dublin Zoning
Ordinance shall be applied to this land use
designation.
b. The Agricultural Districts (A Districts)
provisions of the Alameda County Zoning Ordinance
(Attachment 2) shall apply to properties with the
Interim Agricultural land use designation.
c. All properties with the Interim Agriculture land
use designation shall conform to Sections 8-62.0
through 8-62.9 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to
legal non-conforming uses and buildings.
F. School Facilities Impact Mitigation
Because fees authorized under State Law may be inadequate to
mitigate the effects of new development on the Dublin Unified School
District and the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District, the
- 13 -
36 0 0-
City Council intends to require all future development within the
boundaries of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area to mitigate
impacts on affected school districts required to serve student
population generated by new development.
No development shall be approved on any property subject to this
pre-zoning until after legislative review and approval by the City
Council of a Land Use and Development Plan and Planned Development
District rezoning covering that property, in accordance with Section
8-31.16 of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Prior to Council
approval of a Land Use and Development Plan and Planned Development
District rezoning, all developer(s) of property subject to the Land
Use and Development Plan shall enter into a written mitigation
agreement with the affected school district and the City. The
mitigation agreement shall establish the method and manner of
financing and/or constructing school facilities necessary to serve the
student population generated by the development. The mitigation
agreement shall address the level of mitigation necessary, the amount
of any school impact fees, the time of payment of any such fees and
similar matters. The City shall be a party to any such agreement only
for the purposes of assuring uniformity with respect to different
property owners and appropriate land use planning.
G. Fiscal Impacts Related to the Annexation
Goals and policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan require
annexation and new development to be revenue neutral. Prior to the
effective date of the annexation, the proponents of the prezoning and
annexation shall enter into an agreement with the City that will
guarantee that the financing goals and policies of the Specific Plan
are met.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of September, 1994
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
Planning Director
- 14 -
CD-
PAGE 31 r, CD-
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT CITY OF DUBLIN
STAFF TO MAKE AN APPLICATION TO THE ALAMEDA COUNTY
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCo) FOR ANNEXING
1538 ACRES LOCATED WITHIN THE EASTERN DUBLIN PLANNING AREA TO
THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND 4 ADDITIONAL ACRES TO
DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT AND DETACHING 1,029 ACRES FROM
LIVERMORE AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT AND
INVOLVED IN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PREZONING REQUEST
FILED UNDER PA 94-030 EASTERN DUBLIN ANNEXATION/DETACHMENT AND
PREZONE #1
WHEREAS, Ted Fairfield, representing property owner Jennifer Lin
and Clyde Casterson have requested approval of a Planned Development
(PD) Prezoning, Annexation and Detachment of an area generally located
north of I-580 between Tassajara and Fallon Road within the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to
consider the request on September 6, 1994; and
WHEREAS, proper public notice of this public hearing was given in
all respects as required by; and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the
Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Planned
Development Prezoning, and Annexation/Detachment subject to conditions
prepared by Staff; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard and considered all said
reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does
hereby find that:
1. The subject property is located within the adopted Sphere of
Influence for the City of Dublin.
2. The proposed annexation of 1,538 acres to the City will be a
logical extension of the City of Dublin boundaries.
3. The City of Dublin can provide high quality and efficient
services to the site.
4. The proposed annexation will be consistent with the Dublin
General Plan.
DIHIBJIC-
PAGE `l3
5. The proposed annexation of 1,542 acres to the Dublin San
Ramon Services District (DSRSD) is consistent with the
Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
6. The proposed detachment of 1,029 acres from LARPD is
consistent with the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution of application to
LAFCo pursuant to Government Code Section 56800 regarding Annexation/
Detachment No. 10 consisting of annexing 1,538 acres to the City of
Dublin, annexing 1,542 acres to Dublin San Ramon Services District and
detaching 1,029 acres from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park
District, PA 94-030 Eastern Dublin Annexation/Detachment and Prezone
#1.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of September 1994.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
\94030re3
,44 or 0—
Pi 9 .-07o 9Js J2N Dti/L/ti AbiNC /e7x vH r
4149 02E2-o,c- ,/
G/10..-0 O 3 c1 \NE
• p\-pM
-',
yL o DUBUN CITY LIAYTS
A Illi DUBLIN
g� - :SITE`:
LL
.5,�o 1-580
oEe
o f
cc `20P 4�
O 2
x a
co
PLEASANTON .
fN
VICINITY MAP Imp
N.T.S.
Attadenent l
Lk
�-_____r.rC -
�
ZONING DISTRICTS
Legend
..........
Roads
PD
Rural Residential]
.01 D.UJAc.
Agriculture
PD
Single Family
0.9-6.0 D.UJAc.
PD
Medium Density
6.1.14.0 D.UJAc.
® PD
Med-Hi Density
14.1-25.0 D.UJAc.
PD
High Density
25.1+ D.UJAc.
® PD General Commercial
® PD Neighborhood Commercial
® PD Campus Office
PD Open Space
PUBLIC LAND USES*
P Public/Semi-Public
EL Elementary School
JR Junior High School
HS High School
NS Neighborhood Square
NP Neighborhood Park
CP Community Park
• The actual zoning for these sites is as
shown on the zoning map. All uses are
conditionally allowed uses within their
respective zoning districts
RECEIVED
AN 2 9 199lt
�r I N PLANNING
—�� SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY —
1
I PRE -ZONING BOUNDARY
n■IN...
1
1
1
1>
0
1
1
1
O j
Os , C,OU� I
ONSA/, �OUNVV
� 0 0SON
,,—SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY
1
1
PRE -ZONING BOUNDARY
EL\
Moo
1
1
1
1
SUMMARY OF PRE -ZONING DESIGNATIONS
CATEGORY
ACRES
PD Future Study Area: Rural Residential/Agriculture
10.0
PD Rural Residential/Agriculture
203.4"'
PD Single Family
387.9
PD Medium Density
378.7"
PD Medium high Density
35.2'0
PD High Density
36 6rsi
PD General Commercial
146.6
PD Neighborhood Commercial
39.5(6)
PD Campus Office
76.1
PD Open Space
212.7
Undesignaled (Caltrans)
LiA
TOTAL 1,538 Acres
Notes:
1) Includes 32.9 acres of Parks and Recreation land uses.
1) Includes 72.0 acres of School and 5.3 acres of Parks and Recreation land uses.
3) Includes 31.9 acres of School and 87.9 acres of Parks and Recreation land
uses.
4) Includes 10.0 acres of School laud uses.
5) includes 3.0 acres of Parks and Recreation land uses.
6) Includes 7.98 acres of Public/Snni-Public land uses.
1
1
I
1
0 ��1'' SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY
O-- ---�
_
6
o I
J
J
LL
PRE -ZONING BOUNDARY
INTERSTATE 580 INTERSTATE 580
* Future Study Area: Rural Residential/Agriculture
NORTH
r sod Igor 240r
unannc suLc r-sou
Atbomg —
�w. 8/70/94 •1oos4-o
rjp.t114
�ri�
RECEIVED
, C:
f•
• :►, / � .
�i
f1OBERT J. NIELSEN -
SERIES NO. 94.024636
SCOTT& AZEVEDO A
SERIES NO, 90-317195
SERIES NO. 90-215717
MICHAEL KOBOLD
SERIES NO.91-128046,
MICHAEL KOBOLD
SERIES NO. 91.128046
CHANG SU-0 LIN RT. & EILEENSPEAFSLAGE
SERIES NO. 82-234313 BOOK 8192 O.R. PG. 215
SERIES N0.86-234313
SERIES NO. 86-234314 U.S.A (CAMP PARKS)
SERIES NO.
GYGI
SERIES NO.86-270003 ®®
APN 946-500-1-2
EAST BAY REGIONAL
PARK DISTRICT
SERIES NO.77-021354 a
APN 946-500-1.1 '
EAST BAY REGIONAL
PARK DISTRICT
SERIES NO.76-220123 ADAMS,
APN 946-500-2.1 WALKER &
KOLLER
SERIES NOS.
93-392123
r & 92-428142
APN 946-500.2.2
CASTERSON-/ C
SERIES NOS. 91-039684
& 80-229805
APN 946.500-3
0
v
o
a -- o
OO¢
¢ W)
F1'
e .�
"ANNEXATION NO. 2 BOUNDARY OF TERRITORY ¢O
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA" - ai z ¢
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF DUBLIN BY DUBLIN CITY y o 0
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 110-86, A MAP OF WHICH v1p''
TERRITORY WAS FILED DECEMBER 24, 1986 IN �¢�
BOOK 151 OF MAPS, AT PAGE 57 (86-326514).
RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, -T-
ANNEXATION NO. 62 BOUNDARY LINE OF TERRITORY
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF PLEASANTON BY
PLEASANTON CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 646,
ADOPTED NOVEMBER 8, 1971, IN MAP BOOK 73 AT
PAGE 7 (71-162868) RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
LIN
SERIES NC
90-248111
1PN 946-680.,
a
00 C
h ¢
�¢
a4
J cn
¢ rn
N
Oin
F o
3 Q -- N
N
Z_
rn
JO
z
(n =
III a.
Cr
W
(n
SILVERIA, ANN H. TRUST ( REDGWICI( CONSTRUCTION CO.
SERIES NO. 84-248248 SERIES NO. 82.094708
LIN _IN
SERIES NO. 90-248111 SERIES V0. 90-215061
APN 946-680.3 . APN 9t18.3046-2-15 0
\_ BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTITLED-y \
"RECORD OF SURVEY R/S NO. 1005" DATED
OCTOBER 1990, RECORDED IN BOOK 16, PAGE 37.
CITY OF PLEASANTON LIN LIN
SERIES NO. 92-378021 SERIES NCI. SERIES NO.
APN 946-1040-3-3 92-058918 92-058918
APN 99B.3046-2.6 APN 998-3046-2.7
LIN
SERIES NO. 90-215062 LIN LIN
SERIES NO. 81-066863
APN 946-IG40-3.2 SERIES Na. SERIES NO.
92-058918 92-058918
APN 998.3046-2-9 APN 99B-3046-2.8
LIN ` SERIES NO. 92-069219 LIN SERIES NO. 88-079761
APN 946-1040.3.2 APN 99B-3036-7
LIN
SERIES NO.
90-215062
i
t
PN 946-1040.2
TOTAL A
I
NEXATION AREA: 1538 ACRES f
If
LIN II
9
SERIES NO. 88-079761 I I
z
Q fD
APN 99B-3036-8
Q r
it
O w-
U J'
CENTERLINE OF
FALLON ROAD \
0
(ROAD NO. 7872)
m
w i
PAOYEH LIN
PAOYEH LIN
z a:
SERIES NO.
SERIES NO. LIN
N
91-146796
91-146796 SERIES NOS. 88-144753
APN 99B-3026.1
APN 998-3026.2 & 88.144748
Q
APN 99B-3036.1
BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP
ENTITLED "RECORD OF SURVEY R/8
NO. 1005" DATED OCTOBER 1990,
DUBLI
LAND COMPA
RECORDED IN BOOK 16, PAGE 37.
Y
SERI
S NO.83-182776
MAY DEVANY
A
N 99B-3005.1-2
SERIES NO. 73-073270
APN 998-302&3-11 /
e INTEFISTATE 580
CITY OF PLEASANTON I
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
SERIES NO. AF-064493
DOOLAN WEST ASSOCIATES
SERIES NO. 86-321121
It w
\ -
PLEASANTON
VICINITY MAP
N
I1 L&
FALLON ENTERPRISES, INC.
SERIES NO. 92-376222
SERIES NO. 91-344396
REEL 2658 IMAGE 332
--- LOWELL A. JORDAN TRUST
- - - - - - - SERIES NO. 74.160635
SERIES NO. 82-061343
LOWELL A. JORDAN TRUST
SERIES NO. 74-160635
SERIES NO. 82-061343
- WM. & JEAN MAYNARD
SERIES NO. 72-174841
DUBLINTOWN LTD.
SERIES NO. 83-245554
jCALTRANS
WM. &JEAN MAYNARD
SERIES NO. 85-100554
APN 999-3036.5
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF CALTRANS PROPERTY
EGEND
EXISTING CITY OF DUBLIII
BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY LINE OF CI1 " OF
DUBLIN ANNEXATION
EXISTING CITY OF PLEASANTON
BOUNDARY
This map comtorms to the requirements of the Local
Agency Formation Commission of Alameda County,
Califomla.
Donald LaBelle - Director of Public Works
Ousama H. Kawar - County Surveyor
R.C.E. 18499, Expires 6/30/97
By:
Reid Penland, Deputy County Survyeor
L.S. 5726, Registration, Expires 12/31/95
This map when filed, was accompanied by a
certificate of completion and certified copy of the
boundary description delineated hereon, as required
by Section 57803 of the Government Code, which
certificate of completion and boundary description are
records in Series No. of Official
Records of Alameda County, Califomia.
Steve Szalay - Executive Officer
Local Agency Formation Commission
of Alameda County, California
By:
Donald K. Graff
Administrative Analyst, LAFCO Staff
Filed at the request of
at _ minutes past _ M, on the day of
, 19_, under Series No.
Records of Alameda County, California.
Patrick O'Connell - County Recorder
By:
Deputy County Recorder
This map was prepared by me or under my direction
By:
Robert Chan
L.S. No. 5412, Exp. 9/30/96
NOTE:
1. THE METHOD USED TO CALCULATE THE AREA WAS BY
SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ASSESSOR PARCEL
MAP AREAS.
2. AS A DRAFTING CONVENTION, THE SMALL SEPARATIONS
BETWEEN PORTIONS OF THE LINEWORK AROUND THE
BOUNDARY OF THIS ANNEXATION WERE PROVIDED TO
ALLOW MULTIPLE DESCRIPTIONS TO BE PLACED ON
WHAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE A SINGLE LINE. THESE
LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED COINCIDENT EXCEPT
WHERE NOTED.
0' Boo, 1600, 2400'
GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 ".800'
EXHIBIT 'A'
7
7
i
U L 2 2 19911
A, 94-030
'IMIIN PLANNWry
ROBERT J. NIELSEN Ili
SERIES NO. 94-024636
SCOTTS AZEVEDO
SERIES NO. 90-317195
I — —
II III
I�
SERIES NO. 90-215717
MICHAEL KOBOLD C III l
SERIES NO. 91.128046
MICHAEL KOBOLD
II
IIL
SERIES NO.91-128046
I LI `
CHANG SU-0 LIN R. & EILEENSPERFSLAGE
SERIES NO.82-234313
FRIES NC
SERIES N0. 86-234313 BOOK 8192 O.R. PG. 215 ��
90-248111
SERIES NO. 86.234314 U.S.A. (CAMP PARKS)— \
APN 946-680-
SERIES NO.
GYGI
'a
SERIES NO.86-270003
3
APN 946 500.1•
p 0
F
EAST BY
a
REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT ®
c4
SERIES NO. 77-021354
APN 946 SM11-1
4 m
EAST BAY ADAMS,
W w in q
REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT WALKER &
XO N"aa
SERIES NO. 76-220123 KOLLER
Z � S
APN 946.500-2-1 SERIES NOS.
'-I Z
93-392123
rn z
& 92-428142
W a
1 APN 946-500.2-2
W
f
U)
/CASTERSON—L
ERIES NOS. 91-039684
LIN
& 80-229805
SERIES NO
APN 946.500-3
a®
90-215062
APN 946-1040-2
BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP
ENTITLED "ANNEXATION OF CAMP
PARK AND ENVIRONS TO DUBLIN
SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT
FOR SEWAGE AND REFUSE
SERVICE ONLY" DATED OCTOBER 7,
1992.
Nw,
I
SILVERIA, ANN H. TRUST REDGWICK CONSTRUCTION CO. DOOLAN WEST ASSOCIATES
SERIES NO. 84-248248 SERIES NO, 8'-094708 I SERIES NO. 86-321121
LLINLIN LIN
SERIES NO. 90-248111 SERIES NO. 90-215061
APN 94MOG-3 APN 998-3046-2.15 @
BOUNDARY AS SHOWNION THE MAP ENTITLED
"RECORD OF SURVEY R/S NO. 1005" DATED
OCTOBER 1990, RECORD D IN BOOK 16, PAGE 37.
CITY OF PLEASANTON LIN LIN SERIES NO. 92-378021 SERIES NO. SERIES No.
APN 946-1040-3-3 92-058918 92-058918
APN 99B-3046.2-6 APN 99B-3046-2-7
LIN
SERIES NO. 90-215062
SERIES NO. 81-066863
APN 946-1040-3-2 LIN L I N
SERIES NO. SERF S NO.
92-058918 102-058918
APN 998-3046-2-9 AP14 998-3046.2-8
LIN ` SER
SERIES NO. 88-079761
APN 998-3036-7
ffimmi'lEA:
EF ;* W'a k 0
of
OO
a
'
¢��
a0
O¢
I
Z fD
m I
M0
W
z¢
�
a n
C z K I
J q
Q
N
00
rn0 I
rm
0'-"
Q O m I
W Q
U W
F¢n I
OF
4 O �
PAOYEH LIN
J 1Aa
SERIES NO.
g
Z w <
91-146796
—I W
APN 99B-3026-1
i015-002
PAOYEH LIN
SERIES NO.
91-146796
APN 998-3026-2
i DUBLIN LAND COMPP�NY
SER ES NO.83-1827
APN 998-3005.1.2
ANNEXATION NO. 62 BOUNDARY LINE OF TERRITORY
ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF PLEASANTON BY '
PLEASANTON CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 646, CITY ®F PLEASANTON I
ADOPTED NOVEMBER 8, 1971, IN MAP BOOK 73 AT
PAGE 7 (71.162868) RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
LIN
SERIES NO. 88-079761
APN 99B-3036-8
U.
O N
LIN
zO�l
I
¢ z a I
SERIES NOS. 8E 144753
& 88-144748
�!o
APN 998-3036.1
6 a 0 j
I
I
BOUNDARY AS SHOWN UN THE MAP I
ENTITLED "RECORD OF PURVEY R/S
NO. 1005" DATED OCTOBER 1990,
RECORDED IN BOOK IS, PAGE 37.
— MAY DEVANY
SERIES NO 73 073"70
FALLON ENTERPRISES, INC.
SERIES NO, 92.376222
SERIES NO. 91.344396
REEL 2658 IMAGE 332
This map comforms to the requirements of the Local
aPcc�A�'1�atE Agency Formation Commission of Alameda County,
Califoi��pkOP c0�t111
®. P Donald LaBelle - Director of Public Works
Ousama H. Kawar - County,Surveyor
R.C.E. 18499, Expires 6/30/97
PLEASANTON
VICINITY MAP N
ILL&
LOWELL A. JORDAN TRUST
— — -- — SERIES NO. 74.160635
SERIES NO. 82.061343
LOWELL A. JORDAN TRUST
SERIES NO. 74-160635
SERIES NO. 82-061343
—WM. & JEAN MAYNARD
SERIES NO. 72-174841
APN 998-3026-3-1 C A L T R A
INTERSTATE 580
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
SERIES NO. AF-064493
DUBLINTOWN. LTD.
SERIES NO. 83-245554
WM. & JEAN MAYNARD
SERIES NO. 85-100554
APN 998-3036.5
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF CALTRANS PROPERTY
LEGEND
f
EXISTING DUBLIN SAN IIAMON
®�®® SERVICES DISTRICT BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY LINE OF DUBLIN SAN
RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT
ANNEXATION
EXISTING CITY OF PLEASANTON
®' ® BOUNDARY
By:
Reid Penland, Deputy County Survyeor
L.S. 5726, Registration, Expires 12/31/95
This map when filed, was accompanied by a
'-- certificate of completion and certified copy of the
boundary description delineated hereon, as required
by Section 57803 of the Government Code, which
certificate of completion and boundary description are
records in Series No. of Official
Records of Alameda County, California.
Steve Szalay - Executive Officer
Local Agency Formation Commission
of Alameda County, California
By:
Donald K. Graft
Administrative Analyst, LAFCO Staff
Filed at the request of
at — minutes past _ M, on the
, 19_, under Series No. _
Records of Alameda County, California.
Patrick O'Connell - County Recorder
By:
Deputy County Recorder
day of
This map was prepared by me or under my direction
By:
Robert Chan
L.S. No. 5412, Exp. 9/30/96
NOTE:
1. THE METHOD USED TO CALCULATE THE AREA WAS BY
SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ASSESSOR PARCEL
MAP AREAS,
2. AS A DRAFTING CONVENTION, THE SMALL SEPARATIONS
BETWEEN PORTIONS OF THE LINEWORK AROUND THE
BOUNDARY OF THIS ANNEXATION WERE PROVIDED TO
ALLOW MULTIPLE DESCRIPTIONS TO BE PLACED ON
WHAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE A SINGLE LINE. THESE
LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED COINCIDENT EXCEPT
WHERE NOTED.
0' 900, 1600' 2400'
III
NORT13 GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=800'
EXHIBIT'A'
RECEIVED
/. t i
f,
MN
v
pA C �%i t%t.
CP OUtR
r . ,� • P.Lp1pE
s'
1� DUBLIN ii
1-580
PLEASANTON
VICINITY MAP N
N.T.S.
BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP
ENTITLED "LIVERMORE AREA
RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT I
DETACHMENT" DATED JULY 30, 1992. s!°
WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF TASSAJARA ROAD-
BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP
ENTITLED "ALAMEDA COUNTY SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, LIVERMORE AREA
RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT," DATED
FEBRUARY 1, 1960 COMPILED UNDER THE
SUPERVISION OF OLAF E. ANDERSON,
COUNTY SURVEYOR.
c
1
TOTAL DE
Z
d W
2C�
ow
-
zoo
Cl)
ZFca
J tU
CD N
LIN
SERIES NO. 90-215061
APPI 998-3046.2-15
/
1
B
LIN LIN
SERIES NO. SERIES NO.
92-058918 92-058918
APN 998-3046.2-6 1 APN 998-3046-2.7
LIN LIN
SERIES NO. SERIES NO.
92-058911,' 92-058918
APN 998.3046.2-9 APN 99B-3046.2.8
LIN SERIES NO.
ACHMENTAREA: 1029 ACRES
L. IN
SERIES NO. 88-079761
APN 99B 3036-8
PAOYEH LIN I PAOYEH LIN
SERIES NO. SERIES NO.
91-146796 91-146796
APN 99B-3026-1 APN 99B-3026.2
DUBLIN LAND COM ANY
S RIES NO. 83-1827 6
APN 998-3005-1.2
®®
BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON THE MAPENTITLED "DETACHMENT NO. 73-1 FROM
�+
LIVERMORE AREA RECREATION AND PARK CITY
OF PLEASANTON I
DISTRICT" DATED AUGUST 15, 1973.
" IN
SERIES NOS- 80-144753
& 81I-144748
APN 11B-3036.1
BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP
ENTITLED "RECORD OF SURVEY R/S
NO. 1005" DATED OCTOBER 1990,
RECORDED IN HOOK 16, PAGE 37--\
--MAY UEVANY
SERIES NO, 73-073270
APN 996-3026.3.1 i
INTERSTATE 580
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
SERIES NO. AF-064493
DOOLAN WEST ASSOCIATES
SERIES NO. 86-321121
FALLON ENTERPRISES, INC.
SERIES NO. 92.376222
SERIES NO. 91-344396
REEL 2658 IMAGE 332
BOUNDARY AS SHOWN ON THE MAP
ENTITLED "RECORD OF SURVEY R/S
NO. 1005" DATED OCTOBER 1990,
RECORDED IN BOOK 16, PAGE 37.
LOWELL A. JORDAN TRUST
— — — — — SERIES NO. 74.160635
SERIES NO. 82-061343
CENTERLINE OF
FALLON ROAD
(ROAD NO. 7872)
LOWELL A. JORDAN TRUST
SERIES NO. 74-160635
SERIES NO. 82-061343
WM. & JEAN MAYNARD
1 SERIES NO. 72-174841
I
1 DUBLINTOWN LTD.
i
I SERIES NO. 83.245554
I
WM. & JEAN MAYNARD
i
SERIES NO. 85-100554
1 APN 99B-3036.E
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF CALTRANS PROPERTY
LEGEND
EXISTING LIVERMORE Art:A
CALTRANS RECREATION AND PARK
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY LINE OF LIVErMORE
AREA RECREATION AND 'ARK
DISTRICT DETACHMENT
^--- EXISTING CITY OF PLEASANTON
BOUNDARY
This map comforms to the requirements of the Local
Agency Formation Commission of Alameda County,
California.
Donald LaBelle - Director of Public Works
ousama H. Kawar - County Surveyor
R.C.E. 18499, Expires 6/30/97
By:
Reid Penland, Deputy County Survyyor
L.S. 5726, Registration, Expires 12/31/95
This map when filed, was accompanied by a
certificate of completion and certified copy of the
boundary description delineated hereon, as required
by Section 57803 of the Government Code, which
certificate of completion and boundary description are
records in Series No. of Official
Records of Alameda County, California.
Steve Szalay - Executive Officer
Local Agency Formation Commission
of Alameda County, California
By:
Donald K. Graff
Administrative Analyst, LAFCO Staff
Filed at the request of
at _ minutes past _ M, on the day of
19_, under Series No.
Records of Alameda County, California.
Patrick O'Connell - County Recorder
By:
Deputy County Recorder
This map was prepared by me or under my direction
By:
Robert Chan
L.S. No. 5412, Exp. 9/30/96
NOTE:
1. THE METHOD USED TO CALCULATE THE AREA WAS BY
SUMMARY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ASSESSOR PARCEL
MAP AREAS.
2. AS A DRAFTING CONVENTION, THE SMALL SEPARATIONS
BETWEEN PORTIONS OF THE LINEWORK AROUND THE
BOUNDARY OF THIS ANNEXATION WERE PROVIDED TO
ALLOW MULTIPLE DESCRIPTIONS TO BE PLACED ON
WHAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE A SINGLE LINE. THESE
LINES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED COINCIDENT EXCEPT
WHERE NOTED.
0' Boo, 1600, 240C'
NOAT GRAPHIC SCALE: 1"=800'
EXHIBIT'A'
NN I NAM
LIVERMORE AREA RECREATION
AND PARK DISTRICT DETACHMENT
CITY
CITY OF DUBLIN
RESOLUTION NO.
DATE OF ADOP PON
DATE
REVISION DATE
SCALE
SHEET NO.
CF
1" - 800,
1
i
AUG 26 '94 0E1:57 PLANNING NORTH
A CAM C1 - (A_Al
R-3 Districts
8-29.0 Four-Family Drelling Districts
8-29.1 Pereitted Uses: R-3 Districts
8-29.2 Conditional Uses: R-3 Districts
S-29.3 Density Liaitations: R-3 Districts
8-29.4 Building Site: R-3 Districts
8-38 5 Yards: R-3 Districts
8-29.8 Height of Buildings: R-3 Districts
5-29.3 Other Regulations: R-3 Districts
R-4 Districts
8-30.0 Multiple Residence or R-4 Districts: Intent
8-30.1 Peru tted Uses: R-4 Districts
8-30.2 Conditional Uses: R-4 Districts
8-30.3 Density Lin tatians: R-4 Districts
8-30.4 Building Site: R-4 Districts
8-30.5 Yarns: R-4 Districts
8-30.o Height of building: R-4 Districts
8-30.7 Lot Coverage: R-4 Districts
8-30.8 Density and Coverage Exception: R-4 Districts
3-30,9 Other Regulations: R-4 Districts
8-30.10 Other Regulations: R-4 Districts
PD Districts
8-31.0 Planned Development Districts: latent
8-31.2 Change in Zoning District Required
8-31.3 Preliainary Plan--Application
9-31.4 Preliainary Plan--Professional Services Required
8-31.5 Preliainary Plan--Information Required
8-31.7 Preliminary Plan--Notice to the Public
8-31.8 Preliainary Plan--Action by the Planning Coutssion
8-31.11 Land Use and Developaent Plan-Persons Authorised to Prepare
8-31.12 Land Use and Developaent Plan-Infnraation Required
8-31.15 Coaaon Areas--Provision, Ownership and Maintenance
8-31.18 Land Use and Developaent Plan-Action iv the Planning Coraission and the Board of
Supervisors
8-31.17 Land Use Shall Confers
8-31.18 Structures Not Indicated on the Land Use art Deveioocent Plan
8-31.14 Deposit to Cover Cost of Inspections: Unner Deposit; Over Deposit
A DISTRICTS
8-25.0 Agricultural Districts: Intent
Agricultural Districts, hereinafter designated as a Districts, are established to primate
itpleaentation of Sentra! Plan land use proposals for agricultural and other non-urban uses, to
conserve and protect existing agricultural uses, and to provide space for and encourage such uses
in places there corn intensive developaent is not desirable or necessary for the general welfare.
_.. !Amended by sec. 1, Ord. 72-291
ALAMEDA COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE-JUNE, 1989 Attained
P
3,1
PAGE CP
AUG 26 '94 08:58 PLANNIN/ RTH ^ P.2/4
8-25.1 Map Designation: A Districts
Every parcel designated on the Zoning Map as being in an A-2 District shall hereafter ae suolect
to those regulations for an A District. All such parcels are hereby declared to be in an A
District and shall be so designated upon any revised Zoning Map.
8-25.2 Permitted Uses; A Districts
The fallowing Principle Uses are permitted in an A District:
a) On a buildino site, one one-fasiiy dwelling or one-family sobileho.e either constructed
after September 15, 1971. and issued an insignia of approval by the California Department
of Rousing and Coasunity Uevelopsent and permanently located on a permanent foundation
systee, or constructed after July 15, 1976, and issued an insignia of approval by the U.S.
Department of Rousing and Urban Development and permanently located on a foundation systee.
di Crap, vine or tree fare, truck garden, plant nursery, greenhouse apiary, aviary, hatchery,
horticulture.
cl Raising or keeping of poultry, fowl, rabbits, sheep or goats or similar animals.
d) Grazing, breeding or training of horses dr cattle.
el pinery.
f) Fish hatcheries and rearing ponds.
gl Public or private riding or hiking trails.
(Amended by sec. I, Ord. 72-29; amended by sec. 1, Ord. 80-102).
8-25.3 Conditional Uses: A Districts
In addition to the uses listed in Section 8-60.60 and 8-61.0, the following are conditional uses
and shall be permitted in an A District only if approved by the inning Administrator, as provided
in Section 8-94.0 and 8-25.0:
a) Additional dwellings for persons employed in the agricultural use of subject property and
the families of those persons, and/or living quarters for farm laborers, when found by the
Zoning Administrator to be necessary to the farming operation.
b) Outdoor Recreation Facility.
c) Animal Hospital, kennel.
dl Killing and dressing of livestock, except when accessory as specified in Section 25.4.
e) Public or private hunting of wildlife or fishing, and public ar private hunting clubs and
accessory structures.
f) Packing house for fruit or vegetables, but not including a cannery, or a plant far food
processing or freezing.
•
ALAMEDA COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE-JUNE, 1989
L;:6y
RUG 26 '94 08:58 PLRNNIN FORTH P.3i4
g) Flight strip when accessory or incidental to a permitted or conditional use.
h) Cemetery, crematory, or other facility for the disposal of the busao dead, Pet Cemetery.
i) Hog Ranch
j) Drilling for and removal of ail, gas or other hydrocarbon substances.
k) Radio and television transmission facilities.
I) Public utility building or uses, excluding such uses as a easiness office, storage garage,
repair shop or corporation yard.
n1 Boarding stables and riding academies.
n) Sanitary land fill not to include processing salvaged material.
of Administrative offices accessory to the Principal use on the praises including activities
by the same occupancy which are not related to the Principal use providing such activities
not so related are accessory to the administrative office activity.
p) Occupancy of one mobile hoes by persons directly related to an on-site agricultural pursuit
on a parcel containing a minimum of 100 acres where there is no single family dwelling or
on a parcel containing a animus of 200 acres ehere it can be demonstrated that security
cannot be obtained by existing single family dwelling occupancy; provided, however, that no
such conditional use permit shall be issued for a period to exceed three t5)•vears.
a; Administrative support and service facilities of a Public Regional Recreation District.
r) Privately owned Mind-Electric generators.
!Punned by sec. 5, Ord. 69-23, amended by sec. 2, Ord. 69-83; amended by sec. 1, Ord. 70-25;
amended by sec. 4, Ord. 70-57; amended by sec. 2, Ord. 70-76; acceded by M. 1 Ord. 72-6; amended
by sec. 1, Ord. 72-29; amended by sec. 1,Ord. 76-22; amended by sec. 1,Ord. 76-46: amended by
sac. 1, Ord. 81-191
8-25.4 Accessory Uses: A Districts
When located in an A District, and subordinate to a lawful Use, the following Accessory Uses, in
addition to those normally accessory to a Dwelling are permitted:
a) Fars buildings, including stable, barn, pen, corral, or coop;
6) Building or rocs far packing or handling products raised on the premises;
c1 Killing and dressing of poultry, rabbits and other small livestoct raised on the preaises,
but not including an abattoir for sheep, cattle or hogs;
dl Stand for the sale at retail 04 items produced or raised an the premises having a ground
coverage not in excess of four hundred 1400) square feet;
e) Accessory Business Signs not exceeding an aggregate area of twenty 201 square feet; haying
no saving parts or illumination;
ALAMEDA COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE-JUNE, 1989
AUG 27 '94 08:59 PLANNIP. IOPTH F'.4.--4
f) Administrative office, maintenance building, when accessary to a Principal Use permitted by
subparagraph (111 of Section 3-25.3.
8-25.5 Building Site: A Districts
Every use in an A District shall be on a Building Site having an area not less than one hundred
1100) acres.
iAsended oy sec. 5, Ord. 70-57; amended by sec. 1, Ord. 72-291
8-25.6 Yards: A Districts
The Yard requiresents in an A District are as follows, subject to the general provisions of
Section 8-60.32:
Depth of front yard - not less than thirty 1301 feet.
Depth of rear yard - not less than ten (101 feet.
:lidth of side yards -not less than ten 1101 feet.
(Amended by sac. I, Ord. 72-29)
8-25.7 Signs: A District
No sign in an A District shall be illuminated. No acre than two (2) Sale or Lease signs.shall be
placed an any Lot, and no such sign shall have an area in excess of twenty-four (24) square feet,
except in conformance with Section 8-60.58 and 8-60.59 (Subdivision). In other respects, Section
8-40.1 shall control.
!Eased on sec, 2, Ord. 72-29)
R-I Districts
8-26.0 Single Fa ly Residence Districts: Intent
Single family Residence ; stricts, hereinafter designated as '-1 Districts, are established to
provide for and protect e--ablished neidnborhbods of one billy Dwellings, and to provide space in
suitable locations for additi. .1 development of this .nd, together with appropriate community
facilities and allowance for wstricted interi cultivation of the soil compatible with such
low-density residential development.
8-26.1 Map Designations: R-1 Distric-
Every parcel designated on the Zoning ap as b.'ng in. the R-E District, as well as every parcel
designated as being in a R-1 Di- riot, shall •e subject to these regulations for a Single Family
Residence District, and shall be .esignated R-1 up. any revised Zoning Map.
8-26.2 Permitted Uses: '-1 Districts
The following Principal 'sea are permitted in an R-i Distric
a) One One-Fasil Dwelling;
ALAMEDA COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE-JUNE, 1989
FACE.(4)-07 6�-
INITIAL STUDY
(ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM)
(Completed pursuant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, Section 1.6)
APPLICATION NO. : PA-W-O 30 ECIIkril 14 I/h ONN°--mo w+/ G4" ``"-e,
Prey #1
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name, Address and Phone Number of Proponent: -kid FCl.1ir .e,/d
o.RoX 11 Lf Peas inn, CA- 9yS66 aca CP,t/d_e Cadtksdu ,
372o %A.rlaiara r j /G4
2. Agency Requiring Checklist: J u(�/i1
3. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 4014-a44v1 be,21-+G4l itf
Pit2.04,ar�
4. Description of Project:
24 /r7,Qj t Gino O'�yzti c � j w g�t�Sid
e2 1, w./< w ,h Qr�G✓ fir f� t JC¢, �
C txi �t 421 dyne. �4-e /r3, 6 Si nt o�eG
ceVicAnGs2 f d4- L,}^Ptivwvi.t GeA1-._ %,iC. / aL•
f fe iZ -<
U04/ / /, aAper. r `o
5— pkelevtln.
0 ege-vei
`�'` ,-6 Attachment 3
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:. (See Part III for discuss), • of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in:
F a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes of
geologic substructures?
c7 b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
over covering of the soil?
v B c. Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
d. The destruction, covering or modification of
/ any unique geologic or physical features?
�/ 3 e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition,
or erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
yg. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in:
va. Substantial air emissions of deterioration of
ambient air quality?
u// b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or
temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
v d. Construction or alteration of a facility
within one-fourth of a mile of a school which
might emit hazardous air emissions? If Yes,
school district must be consulted and must
be given written notification of the project
not less than 30 days prior to approval of
EIR or Negative Declaration (Pub. Res. Code
21151.4).
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
_ v y a. Changes in currents, or the course of
direction of water movements, in either
„marine or fresh waters?
'Refer to appropriate note on page B
-2- ,,ArT 5p o� 6)-
/'1 /1
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACL (See Part III for discuss', - of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO
SOURCE
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns or the rate and amount of surface
water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any
p water body?
4 e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
✓ f. Alteration of the direction of rate of flow
of ground waters?
A g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public water
supplies?
✓ V i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
waves?
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
ga. Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
/ shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
gb. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
✓ c. Introduction of new species of plants in a
barrier to the normal replenishment of
/ existing species?
y 9 d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop?
5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
Refer to appropriate note on page 8
-3-
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAr (See Part III for discuss. . of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE'
land animals including reptiles, fish and
/ p shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
• 0 c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the
/ migration or movement of animals?
/ 6 d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
1 g a. Increases in existing noise levels?
_ _/� b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
V 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new
/ q light or glare?
O 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
p resources?
p b. Substantial depletion of any non-renewable
natural resource?
10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
_ • ' a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
1 b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
b' 8 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population of an area?
• ti0 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing?
'Refer to appropriate note on page 8
-4-
PAGE S}'UT (D1-
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC^ (See Part III for discuss.. of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
_ ✓ F a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation and traffic systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
_ _ 8 e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the following
areas?
6 a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
J0 c. Schools?
✓/ q d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
v g e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
/ a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
`/ R b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy or require the development
of new sources of energy?
'Refer to appropriate note on page 8
-5- r,ITE 53 or 6,-
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:See Part III for discussi ' of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE'
16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems or substantial alterations to the
following utilities:
ea. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
0 c. Water?
1/ 9 d. Sewer or septic tanks?
— I
_ U// 117 e. Storm water drainage?
yf. Solid waste and disposal?
/ 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
V 0 a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
— j health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
— obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
— '9 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
/ n 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
X a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of
or the destruction of a prehistoric or
JQ historic archaeological site?
9 b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric,
historic, or architecturally significant
building, structure, or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
JQ ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
Area?
'Refer to appropriate note on page 8
-6-
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAL__ (See Part III for discust :n of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE'
/ 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
V/ a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
\ b. Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future).
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact on two
or more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is significant).
_ V d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
_ 4 22. EIR REQUIRED BY STATUTE. Does the project involve
construction of any facility which burns municipal
waste or refuse-derived fuel? NOTE: If the
answer is yes, then an EIR must be prepared and
certified under Public Resources Code Section
21151.2(a) unless subsections (b) and (c) make
that section inapplicable.
Refer to appropriate note on page 8
-7- g by
nAp,5 Cr
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (See attached statement)
IV. DETERMINATION
0.122
basis this nitial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on he environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on an attached sheet have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that State statute requires
that an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT be prepared and certified.
gnature 5 /9 �
gna Title
c UL iL. G(,EELG./ v 8- /
Printed Name Date
(1) Determination based on location of project.
(2) Determination based on staff office review.
(3) Determination based on field review.
(4) Determination based on the City of Dublin General Plan.
(5) Determination based on the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
(6) Determination based'-on Specific Plan.
`7) ?At
appliCa 8
s 'k,_ lie
C5) Sn1 aAloa-c1 et-.ceoct4 z/ cG -/A,,
/initial.study
PAGc 56 0� Ca).'
AUGUST 22, 1994
ADDENDUM TO THE EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/
SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Update of Plans to Provide Sewer Service
On May 10, 1993, the City Council for the City of Dublin
certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Eastern Dublin
General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan (the Plan). The EIR assesses
the potential environmental effects of implementation of the Plan in
the Eastern Dublin area over the next 20 to 30 years.
This addendum serves as an update of the plans of the City and of
the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) to provide sewer
service to development in Eastern Dublin.
Summary of Information in the EIR on Sewage Treatment and Disposal
Chapter 3.5 of Part 1 of the EIR discusses potential impacts and
mitigation measures relating to sewer service, including collection,
treatment, and disposal. As the EIR explained, DSRSD is actively
planning to provide wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal
service to Eastern Dublin. DSRSD currently collects and treats
wastewater from Dublin, and then pumps it to wastewater export
facilities owned and operated by the Livermore Amador Valley Water
Management Agency (LAVWMA). LAVWMA then pumps the treated wastewater
to a disposal facility operated by the East Bay Dischargers Authority
(EBDA), which in turn discharges the treated wastewater to the San
Francisco Bay.
Impact Nos. 3.5/D and 3.5/E of the EIR, as revised in Response to
Comments Numbers 32-21 through 32-23, identify DSRSD's limited
treatment and disposal capacity as a potentially significant impact.
It is unlikely that the current capacity of DSRSD's treatment plant
will be sufficient to treat substantial wastewater from development
within Eastern Dublin.
Impact No. 3.5/G of the EIR identifies the limited export
capacity of LAVWMA as a potentially significant impact. LAVWMA's
current allocation of export capacity from EBDA would not be
sufficient to serve development within the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan area, which would require an average total daily export capacity
of 4.3 MGD-ADWF (million gallons per day-average dry weather flow).
A key mitigation to the above impacts relied on the efforts of
the Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority (TWA). At the time the EIR was
certified, TWA was in the process of planning construction of a
wastewater disposal system to handle flows in excess of the LAVWMA
system. TWA certified an EIR analyzing three alternatives sufficient
to provide such capacity. The alternative which was then favored by
TWA called for pumping raw (i.e. untreated) wastewater north to
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) for treatment and
disposal. One of the other alternatives involved purchase of
additional capacity from EBDA for discharging treated wastewater to
the San Francisco Bay.
- 1 - Attachment
4-
5, D, 6}
/e1 /'1
If the CCCSD alternative were adopted, there would be no need to
expand the DSRSD Treatment Plant, since DSRSD would be allowed to
discharge untreated water. However, if TWA were to adopt an
alternative calling for export of treated water, such as the EBDA
alternative, DSRSD would have to expand its treatment plant. The
schedule for such expansion was set forth in Mitigation Measure No.
3.5/9.0, as revised in Response to Comment No. 32-23.
Mitigation Measure No. 3.5/11.0 called for the City to support
TWA in its efforts to implement a new wastewater export pipeline
system. Mitigation Measures 3.5/4.0 and 3.5/7.1 required "will-serve"
letters of developers from DSRSD as a condition of the issuance of a
grading permit.
Update to Information in the EIR on Sewage Treatment and Disposal
The above information summarized from the EIR should be updated
as follows:
1. As reflected in the attached update letter from DSRSD dated July
19, 1994 (attached), TWA has formally transferred to LAVWMA its
status as "lead agency" for the development of a wastewater
disposal system to handle flows in excess of LAVWMA's current
system. LAVWMA has accepted this transfer and will now take
TWA's place in securing adequate wastewater pipeline capacity.
DSRSD, a member of LAVWMA, is authorized to pursue such
additional capacity, up to 12.7 MGD, with or without the
participation of LAVWMA's other members. (See "Second
Modification to LAVWMA Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement",
attached). Thus, Mitigation Measure 3.5/11.0 should be revised
as follows:
"Support TWA LAVWMA and DSRSD in its their current efforts
to implement a new wastewater export pipeline system, which
would also serve Eastern Dublin."
2. The preferred disposal alternative is now export of treated
wastewater through EBDA, rather than export of untreated
•wastewater through CCCSD. Negotiations are underway with EBDA
for the purchase of such capacity. All members of EBDA have
indicated a willingness to approve the 12.7 MGD, once the terms
of payment for such capacity are worked out. Out of this 12.7
MGD, DSRSD is expected tc have 5.4 MGD. With the implementation
of this alternative, DSRSD will nave to expand its treatment
facilities, as set forth in the EIR.
With these minor technical amendments and additions, the EIR will
continue to adequately address sewage treatment and disposal issues in
Eastern Dublin.
ieo-men
— 2 -
PAGE 5S OF
Ens s r'e cum Cory op Duaun. �^Ji 6 0 2Di,u4 CE
sEcnops t-6a.0 - g-6,2•9
§ 8-61.1 SAME: DITIONAL. -A Community dentificat' n Sign shall�e per-
mitted in a zoning di rict only i approved b the Zoning Afe((nistrator
as provid in Sectio 8-94.0 and consisten with State a Federal
Law. C unity Ide ification S :ns are reg ated as foil s:
a) Location: ocated wit-in 1,000' o the centerli intersect n
of hig •ays provid g a major a ess to a c nity or wi in
1,000' of the cor-.ration bou ary of the c nity to ich
the sign refers
b) C••y: Sign c••y shall be imited to:
1. The -...e of the P t Office or fices serv' g the area .
and or communit in which the ign is loc ed.
2. I- ormation r ating to the ervice clu active in a area.
3. ommunity s gans or mott
4 Direction information
c) ',ea: aggreg a sign area all not ex ed 120 squa feet.
d) eight: S n height shal not exceed feet.
e) Lighting and Animation: Illuminati, shall not intermitter
nor sha X the sign cog air moving,�arts.
(Amended by sec. 2, Ord. 68-29; amended by sec. 33, Ord. 70-57; repealed by
sec. 1, Ord. 74-1)
§ 8-62.0 NONCONFORMING USES AND BUILDINGS. Any use lawfully occupying a
building or land which no longer conforms to the regulations of the District
in which it is located due to the adoption of the zoning ordinance or a
subsequent amendment thereto shall be deemed to be a Nonconforming Use,
and may continue except as otherwise provided herein. Any lawfully exist-
ing Building or Structure which is wholly or partially used or designed
for Use contrary to the regulations of the District in which it is located,
or which is by reason of its Height or bulk, or with respect to the Yards
or parking spaces about it or in any other manner deficient with respect
to such regulations, shall be deemed to be a Nonconforming Building, and
may continue except as otherwise provided herein.
§ 8-62.1 SAME: EXCEPTION. A Building lawfully constructed or a Use law-
fully occupying a Building or land in accordance with the terms and condi-
tions of a Variance shall not be thereafter deemed to be nonconforming
solely on the basis of a deficiency authorized by the specific Variance
granted
§ 8-62.2 NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS: COMPLETION. Any Building for which a
valid Building Permit has been issued prior to the time of any amendment
of this Chapter, may be completed and used in accordance with the approved
plans; provided, that construction is diligently prosecuted to completion.
Every such building shall thereafter be deemed to be a lawfully existing
Building and Section 8-62.0 of this Chapter shall apply.
§ ' 8-823 Same:cnong.:No Nohu.nforming Use except as-provided In Section 8-82.4 ....
-- , _ -
shall be enlarged or extended so as to occupy■greater area of land or of a Solidi ng than 0?0.,.17-.'7
that occupied at the time it became,Nonconforming Use.Except as otherwlee tided in ��y1/'!
Section 8-82.4 of this Chapter,no Fit nconforming Bulking shall be enlarged,extended or structurally altered unless the entire bulking and the use thereof Is so char•al site bs EF?, I
conforming In every respect.Except as otherwise provided In Section 8.623,no Nonoon- 3h7
fonning_Use shall,be changed to a different Nonconforming'Use.__.• -w_._,
� i
Attcitt s_.__
U PAGE$9 C�.6?-
•
82 this apter, o Nonc 'formic Building sha bee arge
xte ed or s uctura y alte ed unle'ss the tire ildin and e e
tit eof is o chan as to, a confirming every espe . N of
conformi Use sit 1 be anged td a dif rent N confo ing se.
§ 8-62.4 NONCONFORMING DWELLING: EXCEPTION. A nonconforming Dwelling in
any R or A District, where the nonconformity consists only of deficiency
in yard dimensions or the required parking spaces and where no such de-
ficiency exceeds fifty (50) percent of the requirements of the District,
or any dwelling in an A District which is located on a building site
of at least 5 acres and said parcel was of record prior to May 5, 1972,
may be structurally altered or enlarged; provided, that any addition or
enlargement shall itself be fully_conforming and that the number of
Dwelling Units therein shall not be increased.
(Amended by sec. 1, Ord. 72-29)
.
§ 8-62.5 Nonconforming lulldinge:Escepbon.A Business-conducted entirety within a
Building may change to a different business N the new business:
a)Is-among the"permitted us ea"but does not require a conditional use permit In the _ • „
Zoning District in which it is to be located;or If Ina Residential Zoning District and the /:`-/
existing Nonconforming Use and the new business are both"permitted uses'In the C-N
• (Neighborhood Commercial)Zoning District. [�� ..�:/r f
b)Is to be conducted entirely within the Building: •
c)Does not require a greater number of oft-street parking spaces or loading'paces than
the former business.
§ 8-62.6 NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS: MAINTENANCE. Ordinary maintenance and
minor repair of Nonconforming building is permitted; provided, that the
aggregate cost of the work done in any period of twelve (12) months on
minor alterations or replacement of interior walls, fixtures or plumbing
shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the assessed value of the
building according to the assessment thereof by the Assessor of the County
for the fiscal year in which the work was done, and provided further that
neither the cubical content of the building nor the number of Dwelling
Units therein shall be increased.
E 8-62.7 RESTORATION OF DAMAGED BUILDINGS. The restoration and resumption
of the former use of a Nonconforming building that is damagedor partially
destroyed by fire, explosion, Act of God or of the public enemy to
the extent of seventy-five (75) percent or less shall be permitted,
provided that such restoration is permitted by the Building Code of the
County and is started within one year after such damage and diligently
prosecuted to completion. A Nonconforming building that is completely
destroyed, or damaged or partially destroyed to a greater extent than
above specified; shall not thereafter be restored, except in full conformity
with all the regulations of this Chapter. The proportion of damage or
partial destruction shall be based upon the ratio of the estimated cost
of restoring the building to its prior condition to the estimated cost
of duplicating the entire structure as it existed prior thereto. Estimates
for this purpose shall be made by the Building Official.
PAGE 6� --41 U 1.V.
•
5 8-62.8 ABANDONMENT. Whenever a nonconforming use of land or of a
Building in any District is changed to a conforming Use or abandoned
for a continuous period of six (6) months or more, such use shall
not thereafter be re-established, and any subsequent use of the
premises shall be in conformity with all the regulations for the
District.
(Based on sec. 1, Ord. 68-22)
0 8-62.9 LICENSES FOR NONCONFORMING USES: RENEWAL, ETC.: CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT. In every case in which, under the provisions of any
ordinance of this County in effect at the date Ordinance No. 420
took effect, a license or permit is required for the establishing,
maintaining, or conducting of any business use and the business use
exists as a nonconforming use under this article, then the license
or permit shall not be authorized, issued, renewed, re-issued or ex-
tended for the business use unless and until a conditional use permit
has been secured for the continued maintenance or conducting of the
business use.
(Based on sec. 8, Ord. 68-27)
4-02.10 NONCONFOR*iING-SIGNS. Ada--Signs,--dame-Plan,, and their
ing members that did not comply with all provisions of this Chapte
as of May 10, 1969, shall be brought into compliance with the provi-
sions of this Chapter within the time limits set forth in this,
Section:
Change required to bring sign into compliance Conformance Date:
Ma 10 196 plus
Alteration of lighting or movement one year;
Size or height reduction three years;
Removal of sign painted on wall one year;
Change required to bring sign into c liance Conformance Date:
May 10, 1969, plus
Relocation on same Buildin ite two years;
Removal of a free-standinIBusiness Sign three years;
Removal of an Advertising Sign where not
permitted five years;
I provided, how.; r, that any sign nonconforming in more than one respect
shall be brought into compliance with the time limit of the greatest
duration
(Based on sec. 2, Ord. 69-33) Repealed 7-86
E 8- 2.11 SAME: SIGNS AND NAME_:PLATES RENDERED NONCONFORMING SUBSEQUENT
�-PO-MIRY 207-1.9691---A21'-signs j-end-their auppw/Lluis members i euddci cd '
IRepealed, Ord. 7-86
.0102 6( r- 6�
PLANNING APPLICATION FORM
Assessor Parcel Numbers FOR r PA 0) -030 ERS1v)bu1aI ti Ikinex.t.4'm/,Oetackveri'
946 1040 1 2 Gad F"ezon e /
946-1040-2
946-1040-3-2
946-680-3
946-680-4
99B-3036-1
99B-3036-7
99B-3036-8
99B-3046-2-6
99B-3046-2-7
99B-3046-2-8
99B-3046-2-9
99B-3046-2-15
•*,
61r��6y 49
r
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: August 15, 1994
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff
PREPARED BY: Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director if
SUBJECT: Election of Vice-Chairperson
RECOMMENDATIONS: Elect Vice-Chairperson
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: N/A
DESCRIPTION:
Vice-Chairperson Downey resigned on July 5, 1994. The Planning
Commission Rules of Procedures provide that in case of a vacancy in
the office of Vice-Chairperson, the vacancy should be filled by an
election at the next regular meeting after the vacancy occurred. The
person elected would serve the balance of the term. Staff recommends
that the Planning Commission elect a Vice-Chairperson.
ITEM NO. COPIES TO: Agenda/General File
PAGE!OF r.L..