HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/19/1994 PC Agenda a
PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting - Dublin Civic Center Monday - 7:30 p.m.
100 Civic Plaza, Council Chambers December 19, 1994
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
4. ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA
5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS - December 5, 1994
6. ORAL COMMUNICATION - At this time, members of the audience are permitted
to address the Planning Commission on any item(s) of interest to the public;
however, no ACTION or DISCUSSION shall take place on any item which is NOT on
the Planning Commission Agenda. The Commission may respond briefly to
statements made or questions posed, or may request Staff to report back at a
future meeting concerning the matter. Furthermore, a member of the Planning
Commission may direct Staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.
Any person may arrange with the Planning Director (no later than 11:00 a.m.,
on the Tuesday preceding a regular meeting) to have an item of concern placed
on the agenda for the next regular meeting.
6.1 Election of Officers
6.2 Presentation on East Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station
7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.1 PA 94-001 Santa Rita Commercial Center Rezone and proposed
Negative Declaration request to rezone 75± acres from
Planned Development - Business Park/Industrial (low
coverage) to a standard Planned Development. This project
has a Specific Plan Designation of General Commercial. The
proposed Planned Development would allow for an 800,000±
square foot commercial center which may include retail
stores, offices, movie theaters and restaurants among other
uses. The project is located at the southeast corner of the
intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Hacienda Drive.
9. NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10. OTHER BUSINESS (Commission/Staff Informational Only Reports)
11. ADJOURNMENT
(Over for Procedures Summary)
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: December 19, 1994
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff
PREPARED BY: Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director aEr
SUBJECT: Election of Officers
RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Elect Chairperson
2. Elect Vice-Chairperson
3. Appoint Secretary
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None
DESCRIPTION:
The Planning Commission Rules of Procedures provide that officers
should be elected at the first meeting of the Planning Commission in
December of each year. The new terms of office would typically run
until December, 1995, unless a vacancy in an office occurs before that
time. The Planning Commission may appoint a Secretary who may be one
of its members or someone else.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1) elect a
Chairperson; 2) elect a Vice-Chairperson; and 3) appoint the Planning
Director as Secretary. Since Commissioner Burnham's and Chairperson
North's terms are due to expire in December, 1994, the Planning
Commission may wish to continue this item until the Mayor and City
Council have made appointments to fill the expiring seats.
ITEM NO. 10 . 1 COPIES TO: Agenda File
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: December 19, 1994
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff
PREPARED BY: Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Presentation on East Dublin/Pleasanton BART
Station
EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Plans for the East Dublin/Pleasanton Station
Parking Lot
RECOMMENDATION: Receive Presentation
FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None
DESCRIPTION:
The Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) staff and consultants
have previously completed and presented plans for the East
Dublin/Pleasanton Station to the City. The station is under
construction. They have also completed plans for the parking lot
(Exhibit 1) and the contract is out to bid. The contract for the
parking lot is to be awarded in the Spring of 1995.
The plans call for approximately 2,600 parking spaces split
between the north and south sides. The plans for the north parking
lot have recently been revised to include a radio tower with a small
out building. The tower will be approximately 120 feet tall.
The BART staff and consultants will be available at the meeting
to make a brief presentation and to answer any questions about the
parking lot.
ITEM NO. 6 •2 COPIES TO: Agenda/General Files
Chuck Middlebrook, BATC
Mary Dalander, BART
PAGE ► or
1
Is
—DUMAN MVO. 4 _ _ f
(I-
( (
P ( I6
I'
I NORTH PARKING LOT
111 () NORTH ( 1 r STATION PARKING — NE 545
PARKING 1 ;J' STATION PARKING - NC 5fi2
STATION PAItKINC - NW 50
iuiirAnon I'0 V ( II/C PARKING 20
II/C VAN PARKING 3
1 l' '
MID—DAY PARKING 75
lickx - - - �m rt rani t AnPI _ 1 KISS & RIDE 37
�-- -nn I i I I n r I r In I - I EMPLOYEE PARKING 41
•
• \` % `."0/yf - , of C{.�_ :-a TOTAL 1341 I
o �1,OP9( T I/44:f i'r6A � J 6-1 1u_�a'�IP
�p//U 4r kl '' �l$ Js��111� ,
# gyp/ , sown! ►nlzxrnc LOT
•� ���tttyyyll'''U�����JJJJ . A 11�1� 111�9 . I
\ p //#4,71 - - 11$111110.51 • O i TEMPORARYSTATION KING Il4 O
\ ( ' �( (/ 1111-y�)-,,; , II/C PARKING 10
• -tek ) ' (60 83. 10 II/C VAN PARKING 2
— _\ -Q) a• • ^`,a�01w � 11() TOTAL I900
lJ V J\ 1 1
cb
((�._\ CLCC.BUILDING
-- —. \\ a•
Sln I TRACTION ro.CR BUOMATION
�—:- 4, NORTH
-- --•SC
ARES Iy C01117 r.4 11 )� .�
=r.. . _,11 u 1 ❑!. ENTRANCE PLAZA
INTCMBTAT.OM RRRT BOUND
s S
-+ I 17 - .
INTERMIT.000 GMT BOUND
Ys -_ _=_- :-- --=_---- __:� a_-- -- ----
+,Y,.J CX:1-- , • ----- - --_•TiAs�cMA=-ix4a# 1)( w.
IT S+ MAN -� —
E. DUDLIN . �_�—alrnhnttdnmlttQmtnml — rliir _ TRACTION roux
ILSMASAI PLEASANTON °;• \\\�\\\R\\t y
STATION .,° :s+,rEwr(\ irk ,": Y, -�gdp/g ++i a illG �klb pl9'�bp�
iva»� Cw»\�u . ♦ .� pj -• ppl �k ppl p/" l(/ L p
,L� .. l 1\\ „, (S,„,„R„ ,,,, pj p/0/�. ki Q• - Q/�l� )29
`AJ k7QJ _Ss1 �aktl_'vckl 3 kyw\� 0t 1 wuklyijouw I I it 1 tyitauttyi 4y9w1L1 I
ou
Mai FM C - 1 t • • OPENS sow.
C� C� �--- __.----__l 1 p
SOUTH ......a.,,-. —
TDO00000Y �` )` TUTIIRC I1011T RAIL
PARKING ENTRANCE BAR5INC RICHT OF MY
•
LOT PLAZA
•
SITE PLAN ® �- —i
DAY AREA TRANSIT CONSULTANTS SAN FRANCISCO DAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT STONE MARRACCINI PATTERSON
DECHTEL-PARSONS URINCKERIIOFF-TODD-WARREN DUDLIN/ PLEASANTON EXTENSION ARCHITECTS - SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA
E. DUBLIN / PLEASANTON STATION
--__---
T.
�< ze. ir.7.c
Z
�� _-
�i�
J
a. z z
1 f t—
i
l 7
Z
G G
\\y t
-•\ t? :•--
•
-•
�
/.,7 /1 //
," / / / Z 7 :2: I. 1:/ . -..,
Y.
f =
ti I
��ye^��` t rr rr' c'r�•n°1n�7F x. ,5 ,:%I� ... �t Rry �a�,' 'r' i s. :�Y
•
1 i "6're r{ _-. —�..,----= _ - ^S'!sP-- ._,,.,..‘,..,___1...
-�� _ N,w.... -.,r- ..
+� �SS
13;t1�4i4.7 s `Qo ,
d 8
): �F.", k tl` ZoZ o u i o o' of O
4 < ° W H r —<On,w z 'Ps. ,3 Ali^ `:
u� rc zz N u `�'�" I = N; T-1N=,E 8„U
o o.•. s V z
a uZ <L y 9 I . i o� 8 dI I 1
' yY-..i'e di ou uo Q C ztz'z ( I I i N uo - Ztn
:N-ktE',.L. cZ md� �i z uoiu� Ill f�l I ,i -� XZ O
�V2_ y9. i �� o� O `..,”•¢,<'�u3.ul 1 - Wzt Z US
h3{r�}'�Y i �u mo y- Z >Ia:o.!ei x-i'ui i u, ZQ Zd
:i "r'Y u� W d� zlz zlil� I�i`�I N Y
p1 �'f =m uo zi ojo,q lolo>• a ~z La¢ <_,
f v. W o o c <r�,�, o a:�i,ot Q a. C G •
- .,. Glwjwlxlal I .>lzl I N d T w
a.LLa!- O
O� h ��• :cor.i Z} t ?sr'.
Akfvtk',;',';; • 27rm mNF
_ ry _ ne w = ` IC
Cy! .
T' 4" Z 7O - DU
viVar., Ft,. c Oo z .i;A F z
=" : 015 0 _ 1;.� 1 ;u � f«« 7 � -a` W id ne ne _ �< c ; oFmc1 Z� l' J Uu v
�II1+�L\`
•tari N / Tx
,--111.1q". . .4."-- \\- - ,I.q,y
,....isi..
Y F°
I . i ,.. 1- <1
'ram r t co9est\3 f _ ,3' I I' 6 ce9es:9 3 I <`__
I - I
c
-1 i � °� I� I ']
1,1p
f al W .K, \ \ , W Ut--1 s . = ° i3` \ ;
\ \ \\ •' .:.• I 1
•
Q,1
„tc
•
'si ,.. cci.\,:9 3 1 .I`,\ I to\ \ \\ .11'''' , r W b'CJ I�. I Z <^irl
1 I' II - J L t t1 / Oi z .
�i .t.t;. 1 ' 'I o /C =>I IS x pp " ��S ci •,Gj(¢ GJ • /' /tom F
\ I ; - , /
t x I I 1 IL. " I �� L
�+ I•E I E 1
.j
Icc99st9 3 I _ _ 4 N / I I v < y
- w. `St'C t I I I hY f u u' O L J;- ;'3 €_
t I 1 _i_7__r-_' /I�v�j�` '^ 1 S`� Z asl6o °
II "_
1 _ _ `�� _,
I .1 t� ! 13
�. P I I I 8 i I. a� I. / / c <° I I y <r . I W
-_t I I NI m z= j v
_I I _ -
00t99:9 3 / 1 .d9S:9 3 <
I Q 1 1 II
x`'o \\ •I I I i6
I zl I n,'nb I 1 I I I Idl
I81 I i I ,ii l u I;
. I I 1111 II I// 1 d I c
1 II 1 p , / o
000991 3 1 1 It I III
1 0009Gt9 3 I N 1 _ /•
11 - L8'
yye.�yt ✓,/ . r. Imo t ~ �•� W's �;Ti"' �Jy i }I-1A. � •p.�" =4;a �t,1 „ . st. y. ,t"- • _• >` !' ;r
�• "^t11 tl `h.: Ss 1��{:C . .'r iZ „ 4.:, '$1 l., 7.'x; +!.x; � •G.� -r z; y tr
> i - ':;�� - • r'F.f.I' t ?rt �., x :i.� q Tta..,q.�„s. r i. ';� {
rl;ry. - rc. ii i.,,.s r� •4. +'§ �. 57-�.y ,( r s�. q`ite m`.v5.'"kr Pi ""i y4' ti-+,+ :ir.' � •,t -� ({Ilk
i r �:•� t R.4 r°" JM•! v...< y- '',,.t -ve 4.,•.r-S t ,k �,3 `4 ;e -- t,- s. i-4 i .- ♦k ' x
t` r ,,.r • ` • •. ,,;,ate . ' �'
`,1.c_ SoN - . ` + -VFIV-k - s 34i f-11•51 Y t m 3.? T• fs='�w� t,�` '' ,'`� ''*''',.471
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: December 19, 1994
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff t
PREPARED BY: Jeri Ram, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: PA 94-001 Santa Rita Commercial Center
Planned Development Rezoning
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT: A request to rezone 75 ± acres from Planned
Development - Business Park/Industrial (low
coverage) to a standard Planned Development. This
project has a General Plan and Specific Plan
Designation of General Commercial. The proposed
Planned Development would allow for an 800,000±
square foot commercial center which may include
retail shops, offices, movie theaters and
restaurants among other uses.
APPLICANT/ Homart Community Centers\Homart Development Co.
PROPERTY OWNER: 1099 18th Street, #2680
Denver, CO 80202
Alameda County Surplus Property
Authority
399 Elmhurst Street
Hayward, CA 94544
LOCATION: 75 ± acres on the southeast corner of Hacienda
Drive and Dublin Boulevard. This area is known as
the Hacienda Gateway in the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan
ASSESSOR PARCEL: 946-15-1-4 (por)
PARCEL SIZE: 75+ acres
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: General Commercial
EASTERN DUBLIN
SPECIFIC PLAN
DESIGNATION: General Commercial
.I COPIES TO: Applicant
Owner
ITEM NO. Address File
EXISTING ZONING: Planned Development - Business Park/Industrial
(Low Coverage)
EXISTING LAND USE: Primarily vacant with remains of the old Santa
Rita Jail Facility
SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING DISTRICT AND
SPECIFIC PLAN (SP) LAND USE DESIGNATIONS:
NORTH:
a. Land Use: Vacant
b. Zoning District: Business Park/Industrial
c. SP Land Use Designation: Neighborhood Commercial, Single Family,
Medium Density and Medium High Density Residential
SOUTH:
a.-c. 1-580
EAST:
a. Land Use: Vacant
b. Zoning District: Business Park/Industrial: Low Coverage
c. SP Land Use Designation: Campus Office
WEST:
a. Land use: Vacant
b. Zoning District: Business Park/Industrial: Low Coverage
c. SP Land use Designation: Campus Office
ZONING HISTORY:
The site was the location of the old Santa Rita Jail Facility. The
new Jail Facility has been relocated north of Gleason Road.
PA 85-018: The City of Dublin Prezoned this parcel
Business Park Industrial/Low Coverage on
September 23, 1985. The City of Dublin
annexed this land as part of the annexation
of 2713.47 acres of land on December 24,
1986.
Eastern Dublin The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and
Specific Plan & General Plan Amendment were adopted on
General Plan May 10, 1993, and was effective
Amendment: in November, 1993, following the referendum
election. The General Plan and Specific Plan
Land Use Designations were applied to the
subject property at that time.
SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission open the public hearing,
take testimony and continue the public hearing to January 3, 1995, in
order to review the public comments on the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and staff's responses to those comments prior to taking
action on the PD Rezone.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
Section 8-31.0 Planned Development District Intent. Planned
Development Districts, hereinafter designated as PD Districts, are
established to encourage the arrangement of a compatible variety of
uses on suitable lands in such a manner that the resulting development
will:
a) Be in accord with the policies of the General Plan of the
City of Dublin;
b) Provide efficient use of the land that includes preservation
of significant open areas and natural and topographic
landscape features with minimum alteration of natural land
forms;
c) Provide an environment that will encourage the use of common
open areas for neighborhood or community activities and
other amenities;
d) Be compatible with and enhance the development of the
general area;
e) Create an attractive, efficient and safe environment.
Section 8-31-13 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - PURPOSE AND
REQUIREMENTS FOR. The Land Use and Development Plan shall be part of
the Planned Development District zoning process. The Land Use and
Development Plan is intended to provide to the City a comprehensive
plan of the proposed development to insure that the intent and
purposes of the Planned Development District are met. The processing
requirements for a Land Use and Development Plan are as follows:
a) A Land Use and Development Plan may proceed as a single
phased project addressing the entire Planned Development District
area, or as a multiple phased project addressing portions of the
Planned Development District area.
b) Prior to issuance of a Site Development Review permit,
building permit, or other development permit, a Land Use and
Development Plan shall be required for that portion of the Planned
Development District where development is proposed.
c) A Land Use and Development Plan shall be subject to review
by the Planning Commission and adoption by the City Council as an
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ,
State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines.
The project, as mitigated, will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: The public review period is from November 23,
1994 to December 23, 1994.
-3-
"AG J Grit'
NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the November 19, 1994, public hearing
was published in the local newspaper, mailed to adjacent property
owners, and posted in public buildings.
ANALYSIS:
Project Description:
Several steps will be required before the Santa Rita Commercial
Center can proceed to construction as follows:
1. Rezone 75 + acres from Planned Development - Business
Park/Industrial (low coverage) to a General Commercial Planned
Development.
2. A development agreement is required for each project in Eastern
Dublin. At the first meeting in January, staff will bring forward a
Development Agreement between the County, Homart Community Centers and
the City of Dublin for the Planning Commission's review and
recommendation to the City Council.
3. Site Development Review approval will be required prior to
approving building permits for the project.
4. The Applicants have also indicated that they will process a
tentative parcel map. The project would be located on a 75+ acre
portion of the 951 ± acre Santa Rita property owned by Alameda County.
A tentative parcel map would separate this 75± acres from the
remaining County property.
Consistency
The proposed project is consistent with the City of Dublin
General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan
Amendment.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
The environmental document that was prepared for the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment was a "Program
Environmental Impact Report". CEQA Guidelines state that if a Program
Environmental Impact Report is prepared, subsequent environmental
documents need to be prepared only if there were additional
environmental impacts not considered in the preparation of the
original environmental document.
The City has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
Santa Rita Commercial Center Project (Exhibit A) . A Mitigated
Negative Declaration is similar to a Negative Declaration. The major
difference between the two types of environmental documents is that a
Mitigated Negative Declaration requires certain mitigation measures or
conditions of approval be added to the project in order to render
environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. Additionally,
when a Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared, a Mitigation
Monitoring Program must also be adopted.
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment Final
EIR (FEIR) contains more than 250 mitigation and action measures.
These items have been incorporated into a Master Matrix that is being
used to monitor compliance with the Specific Plan. The Master Matrix
is attached to the Santa Rita Commercial Center Mitigated Negative
Declaration (Exhibit A) and has been organized into columns as
follows:
1. It. No.: A numerical listing of the matrix for reference use.
2. Mit Meas. No.: The Mitigation Measure number from the Eastern
Dublin Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. Act. Prog No.: The Action Program number reference from the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
4. Lead: The agency with the lead responsibility to ensure the
mitigation measure or action program is accomplished.
5. What is the Action or Measure: A summary of the Action Program
or Mitigation Measure from the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan or Final
Environmental Impact Report.
6. Start/End: When work towards completing the action or measure
should begin and be completed.
7. NA: The Not Applicable column is checked if the item is not
applicable to the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project.
8. PROJ: The Project column is checked if the item is incorporated
into the project proposal.
9. COND: The Condition column is checked if the item should be made
a condition of approval.
10. ASAP: The As Soon As Possible column is checked if the City
should begin working on the item immediately (sometimes this column is
checked if it is not applicable to the Santa Rita Commercial Center,
but as a reminder for the City to begin work on it because it may be
needed for another Eastern Dublin project).
11. Action Taken: This column contains comments on the progress
taken or reasons why another column was checked.
12. Completed: This column provides an area to make notes if an item
has been completed.
13. Issue: This column was a cross reference area to major topic
areas in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
A legend is attached to the Master Matrix explaining all of the
abbreviations.
-5- 6 /0
Projects that are proposed for Eastern Dublin will be evaluated,
in part, utilizing this Matrix. The Master Matrix has been used for
this project in two ways:
1. It is attached to the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration (as a part of the Initial Study) (Exhibit A) to indicate
that the Action Programs of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and
Mitigation Measures of the FEIR relating to the Rezoning are being
addressed for this project; and
2. It was revised into the "Santa Rita Commercial Center
Project Mitigation Monitoring Program" (Exhibit B). The Master Matrix
was revised to create the Mitigation Monitoring Program by:
A. Removing all the items in the Master Matrix that were
not applicable to the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project;
B. Adding a new column labeled "Condition No.". This
column will be used by staff to monitor what conditions on the project
satisfy what Item on the Matrix.
C. Adding a new column labeled "completed". In this
column, staff will check off and note when the item is completed.
D. Removing the column labeled "Issue" which is no longer
necessary.
Those items in the Matrix that were required to be completed at
the time of Rezoning have been included as conditions of approval of
the PD Rezone for the Santa Rita Commercial Project. This will ensure
compliance with the Mitigation Measures and Action Programs of the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and FEIR.
The Public Review Period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration
will end on December 23, 1994. Staff will bring forward public
comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and staff's Response to
Comments to the Planning Commission at their first meeting in January.
Fiscal Analysis
Policies of the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
require that development in the area pays for its needed
infrastructure and services.
The Applicants have not requested City financing assistance for
their on-site infrastructure needs. Mitigation Measures and
Conditions of Approval of this project require that Applicants enter
into a Development Agreement with the City and pay traffic and public
facilities impact fees. These requirements insure that the Applicants
are paying their fair share of off-site public infrastructure needed
in Eastern Dublin without using General Fund monies.
-6- to ID
This project, like others in Eastern Dublin, will require
provision of public services. Monies for provision of these public
services will come from the City's General Fund. A detailed Fiscal
Impact Analysis was prepared for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
That Analysis examined the impacts of development in Eastern Dublin in
relation to use of General Fund monies for provision of public
services. The Analysis found that after several years of shortfall,
Eastern Dublin would provide more revenues than it would require in
expenditures for public services.
In addition to the original fiscal analysis for the Specific
Plan, an updated fiscal analysis for the Specific Plan area presently
within the City and proposed to be included in the City as part of the
City's first Eastern Dublin Annexation has been prepared. This fiscal
analysis also included the direct fiscal impacts of the Santa Rita
Commercial Center Project.
The updated fiscal analysis (Attachment 1) for both the areas
identifies a small shortfall of $40,917.00 in Fiscal Year 1994-95
attributable to start up fire services. A shortfall of $216,141 is
identified for Fiscal Year 1995-96. However, the City's Annexation
Agreement with the Lin Families would completely eliminate this
shortfall. In those years following Fiscal Year 1995-96, the City
would realize a substantial operating surplus as a result of the Santa
Rita Commercial Center Project.
Therefore, it can be concluded that this project is consistent
with the fiscal policies in relation to provision of infrastructure
and public services of the City's General Plan and the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment.
Planned Development Rezoning
The Applicants are requesting approval of a Planned Development
(PD) Rezoning to establish the General Provisions and Development
Regulations for the 75± acre project area.
A Land Use and Development Plan for the PD Rezone has been
submitted for the project. It consists of:
1. A Planned Development Rezone Application dated September 6,
1994, prepared by Homart Community Centers; and
2. A Conceptual Site Plan prepared by Homart Community Centers
dated September 23, 1994 (which supersedes the conceptual
site plan contained in the Rezone Exhibit dated September 6,
1994) . The September 23, 1994, Conceptual Site Plan will be
displayed at the Planning Commission Meeting; and,
The majority of the Applicant's Rezone Application and proposed
Development Standards (Attachment 2) were found by staff to be
consistent with the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, General Plan
Amendment, the FEIR, and various concerns of local agencies. These
include the Applicant's proposed permitted and conditional uses (with
the exception of hotel/motel discussed below) ; setback and yards;
-7- LGc_.. / .
maximum building heights; parking and loading (with the exception of
parking space size and aisle width noted below) ; bicycle facilities;
and landscaping.
The following revisions to the Rezone Application are recommended
by the Planning Staff. These changes were made to address land use
issues and provide flexibility for parking lot design and layout as
follows:
1. The Applicant's list of uses for consideration as permitted
uses within the new PD District are similar to those permitted in the
C-2 Zone, with some modifications. Staff has worked with the
Applicant and has one recommended modification to their proposed list,
to which they have agreed. The modification is to change hotel/motel
from a permitted to a conditional use.
A hotel/motel type of use is generally evaluated as a Conditional
Use Permit in commercial areas. The City's Zoning Ordinance presently
provides for a hotel/motel use in the C-1 Zoning District with a
Conditional Use Permit. Through the conditional use permit process,
staff can evaluate traffic, circulation and possible land use
conflicts so that the Planning Commission can determine the
suitability of the use at a particular location. The Applicants have
agreed to this change.
This change has been made in the attached Resolution (Exhibit D)
recommending approval of the PD Rezone.
2. The Applicants have also proposed a list of prohibited uses.
Staff is not recommending that this list be included in the approval.
Under the City's Zoning Ordinance, uses are not permitted if they are
not identified as permitted or conditional permitted uses, unless they
meet the intent of the P.D. Zoning District. Therefore, listing
prohibited uses is not necessary and might be confusing because it
would vary from the manner in which the entire Zoning Ordinance is
written.
This change has been made in the attached Resolution (Exhibit D)
recommending approval of the PD Rezone.
3. The maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) should be .25 instead of
25%. This appears to be a typographical error in the Applicant's
submittal.
The proposed FAR is consistent with the present PD Zoning
District, PD Business Park Industrial/Low Coverage of .25. The
proposed FAR is also consistent with the General Plan Land Use
Designation of General Commercial and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Designation of General Commercial in the Hacienda Gateway Area.
This change has been made in the attached Resolution (Exhibit D)
recommending approval of the PD Rezone.
-8-
4. The Applicants have requested a minimum size parking space
of 9' X 18' which varies from the City standard that requires 180
square feet of area, a minimum width of 9 feet and minimum length of
18 feet.
Staff recommends that the development standard in relation to
parking be revised to read as follows:
D. Parking Spaces: Size and Location. A standard
parking stall shall be a minimum of nine (9) feet wide by
nineteen (19) feet in length. Compact stalls shall be a
minimum of eight (8) feet wide by a minimum of seventeen
(17) feet in length. Compact parking spaces may comprise up
to 25% of the required parking spaces. Where parking spaces
abut sidewalks or landscape areas, the length of a parking
stall may be reduced by two feet. Minor adjustments to
parking space size and location may be made through the Site
Development Review process.
This change has been made in the attached Resolution (Exhibit D)
recommending approval of the PD Rezone.
5. The Applicant has requested a 24' aisle width for 90 degree
parking with two way traffic. The City standard is a 25' aisle.
Staff recommends that we maintain the City standard of 25' but add a
new sentence at the end of the development standard to indicate that
minor adjustments to the aisle width standards may be made through
Site Development Review process.
This change has been made in the attached Resolution (Exhibit D)
recommending approval of the PD Rezone.
6. Planning Staff recommends that two clarifications in
relation to internal and perimeter setbacks be made in the Rezone
Application.
b. Under Item 5A, Minimum Setbacks, it is recommended that
this Section be revised to clarify that it relates to perimeter
setbacks; and
a. Under Item 5C, Minimum Yards, it is recommended that
this Section be revised to clarify that it relates to internal
setbacks.
This project has been reviewed by other City Departments and
affected agencies. Their comments have been incorporated into the
Conditions of Approval. Suggested Conditions of Approval relative to
the Site Development Review or Tentative Subdivision Map will be
applied at the time of approval of those applications.
-9- 4
RECOMMENDATIONS:
FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation.
2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public.
3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public.
4) Continue public hearing to January 3, 1995.
ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the
Public Hearing to January 3, 1995, in order to review the
public comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
staff's Response to Comments prior to taking action on the
PD Rezone.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (under
separate cover)
Exhibit B: Mitigation Monitoring Program (under separate cover)
Exhibit C: Resolution recommending City Council certify the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt the Mitigation
Monitoring Program
Exhibit D: Resolution recommending City Council approval of the
Planned Development Rezoning
Background Attachments:
Attachment 1: Letter to Richard C. Ambrose, City Manager, from ERA
dated November 3, 1994, regarding fiscal analysis along
with attached Table 1, "Summary of Revenues and
Expenses, Fiscal Year 1995-96 to 1998-99".
Attachment 2: Rezone Application including applicant's written
statement and preliminary site plan which includes the
project location.
-10- r0 10
AMENDED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(Prepared pursuant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, Section 1.7(c), 5.5)
Description of Project: A request to rezone 75 +/- acres
from Planned Development - Business Park/Industrial (low coverage)to
a standard Planned Development. The project will also include a
Site Development Review and Tentative Parcel Map. This project has a
Specific Plan and General Plan Designation of General Commercial.
The proposed Planned Development would allow for an 800,000 square
foot commercial center which may include retail shops, offices, movie
theatres and restaurants among other uses.
Project Location: 75 +/- acres on the southeast corner of
Hacienda and Dublin Boulevard
Name of Proponent: Homart Community Centers
I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
Attached is a copy of the Initial Study ("Environmental Information
Form" and Environmental Checklist") documenting the reasons to support
the above finding.
Mitigation measures are included in the project to avoid potentially
significant effects on the environment and are included as part of the
Initial Study.
Signature
Dennis H, Carrington
Printed Name
Senior Planner
Title
}4Dvs►-t7362 'l a, ILIA
Date
Attachments
Date Published:
Date Posted:
Date Notice Mailed:
Considered by:
On: _
Action on Negative Declarations'
Approved Disapproved
EXHIBIT
filed:
of Determination filed: /___L
Council Resolution No.
SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER
INTIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Prepared by the City of Dublin
Planning Department
November, 1994
INTRODUCTION
This Initial Study has been prepared by the City of Dublin to assess
the potential environmental effects of the proposed Santa Rita
Commercial Center. The analysis is intended to satisfy the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and
provide the City with adequate information for project review.
The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment Final EIR
(consisting of the DEIR dated August 28, 1992; Responses to Comments
Part I dated December 7, 1992; Responses to Comments Part II dated
December 21, 1992; Revisions to Part I of the Responses to Comments
relating to the Kit Fox; an Addendum to the DEIR dated May 4, 1993;
and a DKS Associates Traffic Study dated December 15, 1992) (SCH
91103064); was adopted by the City Council on May 10, 1993. The FEIR
is available to the Public at the City of Dublin Planning Department
located at 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California. An Addendum to the
FEIR was approved by the City Council on August 22, 1994. The
environmental impact report that was prepared for the Eastern Dublin
General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan was a "Program" environmental
impact report. If a program environmental impact report is prepared,
subsequent environmental documents need to be prepared only if there
were additional environmental impacts not considered in the
preparation of the original environmental document (CEQA Guidelines
Section 15168) . The Santa Rita Commercial Center is proposed to be
located within the boundaries of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
Although the City of Dublin has determined that the project will not
have any additional environmental impacts that are not reduced to
insignificance by mitigation measures and corresponding conditions of
approval, the City wants to ensure that the environmental review
process is set forth in a document and opened for public review.
Therefore, an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been
prepared.
This Initial Study includes a project description, environmental
checklist, and discussion focused upon issues identified in the
checklist. The attachment to the Initial Study is a Matrix which has
incorporated the Mitigation Measures and Action Programs of the
Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan which will
reduce the environmental impacts of the project to a level of
insignificance.
The Matrix has been designed for use in evaluating specific project
proposals in Eastern Dublin for compliance with the Eastern Dublin
Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
Please see the Legend which is the cover page to the Matrix for an
explanation of the headings and abbreviations within the Matrix. The
Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") and the two
approved addenda thereto are referenced throughout this Initial Study.
Please refer to the Matrix to review the Mitigation Measures and/or
Action Programs.
In summary, the Initial Study concludes that the project will not pose
any significant adverse effects that cannot be mitigated through
mitigation measures required through the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan
Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
The project is in conformance with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan Designations and conflicts will not be created with
established land uses on surrounding properties.
This study was prepared based upon the location of the project, staff
office review, field review, comments from City, County and Special
Districts, comments submitted by local agencies; use of City Planning
documents, the CEQA Law and Guidelines, City of Dublin CEQA
Guidelines, and previously certified Environmental Impact Reports.
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Homart Community Centers of Denver, Colorado (the applicant) is
proposing a commercial project consisting of an 800,000 ± square
foot center on approximately 75 acres of land on the southeast
corner of Hacienda Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. The site has
a General Plan Designation of General Commercial; a Specific Plan
Designation of General Commercial; and is in Planned Development
- Business Park/Industrial (low coverage) Zoning District. The
applicants propose as part of the project to rezone the site to
be consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan to a
standard Planned Development. The Planned Development would
allow general commercial type uses. As part of the project, they
will process a Site Development Review approval and a Tentative
Parcel Map. The Applicant plans to process the Rezone to a
Planned Development first, following shortly thereafter with the
Site Development Review and Tentative Parcel Map applications.
3
n
FIGURES
Figure One: Vicinity Map
Figure Two: Preliminary Site Plan
Figure Three: Dublin San Ramon Services District
Proposed Homart Development Water
and Sewer Facilities
4
7
D�z A
SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER
zg� R DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA
z - c.7
0
V I C I N I T Y M A P . ----
.Z . . : :. ' .
SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER yl
/ /l ' ri-
-ti
`` n
/,� �`�` W ' ,� a
..Mw mow"/ .N
,'''',..:,,,... le.,, a ,�\I'% ' 111‘Wr
LIVERMORE
4, PLEASANTON I k _
, . itt. ,,,,...4,..,
, , —.4>10*...5„. . . , •,•••
R.A: 3 `WI
a ?a�i
J �erno 1
ALAMEDA COUNTY SURPLUS PROPERTY AUTHORITY
I
a
Os O
..... . ....... .
....... . ... ....... ..
a
v
a
JDU13 ---------------
U11, I
nn
.. ...................
MIN
Conceptual Site Plan
41JEZZ-11 �11
FTGURE 2
k
DOUGHERTY
RESERVOIR
STORAGE TANK
4.0 MG CAPACITY
w
J
CK
24"
ZONE 7
TRANSMISSION
LINE
LEGEND
EXISTING ROAD
......•••••• ABANDONED ROAD
— — — FUTURE ROAD
EXISTING WATER FACILITIES
PROPOSED WATER FACILITIES
EXISTING SEWER FACILITIES
PROPOSED SEWER
FACILITIES (ALT. 1)
PROPOSED SEWER
FACILITIES (ALT. 2)
--------- PROPOSED SEWER
FACILITIES (ALT. 3)
0 500 1000 FT
0 �
1 "-1000'
G.S. DOpSON & ASSOCIATE-5
C 0 N S U L T 1 14 C E 14 C 1 11 E E R S
JL—_ 8th STREET
111 <t
CAMP PARKS CK
� Cn
O W
n w
6th STREET Y
5th STREET
DUBLIN
0 24"
1-
f-
1�,
c
COURT
4th STREET
3rd STREET
SANTA RITA JAIL
BRODER BLVD
a GLEASON DRIVE CHP
Y o¢cr-
Q GLEASON DRIVE
<v
o II Q
5th STREET
- II
MA111 STREET
`:'.4th STREET::
��..`_::::......::::::......:......:::: .: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::' ANIMAL
o TYRELL CONTROL
......... ..............2".
1...........
2nd STREET SHELTER
BLVD
1st `:STREET:.;;
DUBLIN
BLVD'
II BART
n
o
Q
SANTA RITA z
:::::::::::.:........................................:
..........................................
METER
PARKING
�
TURNOUT
u
HOMART VAULT
LOT
<
¢
DEVELOPMENT
/
Q
30" 30" 16"
30E-
---------
A' I
— FTGi1Rr 3
FIGURE NUMBER
DUBLIN SAN RAMOND HOMART DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
DISTRICT WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES
1
INITIAL STUDY
(ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM)
(Completed pursuant to City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines, Section 1. 6)
APPLICATION NO. : PA 94-001
Io BACKGROUND
1. Name, Address and Phone Number of Proponent: HomartCommunity
Centers
2 . Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Dublin
3 . Name of Proposal, if applicable: Santa Rita Commercial Center
4 . Description of Project: A request to rezone 75 +/- acres
from Planned Development - Business Park/Industrial (low
coverage) to a standard Planned Development. This project has a
Specific Plan Designation of General Commercial. The proposed
Planned Development would allow for an 800, 000 square foot
commercial center which may include retail shops, offices, movie
theatres and restaurants among other uses.
5
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPh_fS (See Part III for discus,ion of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in:
X 1,3,6 a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes of
geologic substructures?
X 1,3,6 b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
over covering of the soil?
X 1,3,6 c. Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
X 1,3,6 d. The destruction, covering or modification of
any unique geologic or physical features?
X 1,3,6 e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site?
X 1,3,6 f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition,
or erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
X 1,3,6 g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
2. AIR. Will the proposal result in:
X 2,6 a. Substantial air emissions of deterioration of
ambient air quality?
X 2,6 b. The creation of objectionable odors?
X 2,6 co Alteration of air movement, moisture or
temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
X 2,6 d. Construction or alteration of a facility
within one-fourth of a mile of a school which
might emit hazardous air emissions? If Yes,
school district must be consulted and must
be given written notification of the project
not less than 30 days prior to approval of
EIR or Negative Declaration (Pub. Res. Code
21151.4) .
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
X 2,6 a. Changes in currents, or the course of
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters?
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA..iS (See Part III for discus-ion of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
X 2,6 b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns or the rate and amount of surface
water runoff?
X 2,6 c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
X 2,6 d. Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
X 2,6 e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
X 2,6 f. Alteration of the direction of rate of flow
of ground waters?
X 2,6 g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
X 2,6 h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public water
supplies?
X 2,6 i. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
waves?
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
X 1,3,6 a. Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants. (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
X 1,3,6 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
X 1,3,6 c. Introduction of new species of plants in a
barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
X 1,3,6 d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop?
5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
X 6 a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA�i'S (See Part III for discussion of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)?
X 6 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
X 6 c. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
X 6 d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
X 1,2,3,6 a. Increases in existing noise levels?
X 1,6 b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
X 1,6 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
X 6 S. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result
in:
X 6 a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
X 6 b. Substantial depletion of any non-renewable
natural resource?
10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
X 6 a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
X 6 b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
X 6 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
Si
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPA..2S (See Part III for discus ion of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
X 6 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing?
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the
proposal result in:
X 1,6 a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
X 1,6 b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
X 6 c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation and traffic systems?
X 1,6 d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
X 1,6 e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic?
X 2,6 f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in any of the
following areas?
X 2,6 a. Fire protection?
X 2,6 b. Police protection?
X 2,6 c. Schools?
X 2,6 d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
X 2,6 e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
X 2,6 f. Other governmental services?
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
X 2,6 a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
X 2,6 b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy or require the development
of new sources of energy?
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
9
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPALAS (See Part III for discussion of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a
need for new systems or substantial alterations to
the following utilities:
X 6 a. Power or natural gas?
X 6 b. Communications systems?
X 6 c. Water?
X 6 d. Sewer or septic tanks?
X 6 e. Storm water drainage?
X 6 f. Solid waste and disposal?
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
X 6 a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
X 6 b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
X 1,3,6 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
X 1,6 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
X 1,2,6 a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of
or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
X 1,2,6 b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric,
historic, or architecturally significant
building, structure, or object?
X 1,2,6 c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
X 1,2,6 d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
10
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAL.TS (See Part III for discussion of environmental
topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
X 1,2,3,6 a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
X 1,2,3,6 b. Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future).
X 1,2,3,6 c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact on two
or more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small, but
where the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is significant).
X 1,2,3,6 d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
X 1,2,3,6 22. EIR REQUIRED BY STATUTE. Does the project
involve construction of any facility which burns
municipal waste or refuse-derived fuel? NOTE: If
the answer is yes, then an EIR must be prepared
and certified under Public Resources Code Section
21151.2(a) unless subsections (b) and (c) make
that section inapplicable.
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
11
II. ENVIRONMENTAL Ir,eACTS (See Part III for discussion of
environmental topics)
YES MAYBE NO SOURCE2
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (See attached statement)
IV. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
X I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on an attached sheet have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that State statute requires that an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT be prepared and certified.
-)L
-c-_____, Senior Planner
ignature Title
Dennis H. Carrington November 22 , 1994
Printed Name Date
(1) Determination based on location of project.
(2) Determination based on staff office review.
(3) Determination based on field review.
(4) Determination based on the City of Dublin General Plan.
(5) Determination based on the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
(6) Determination based on Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (consisting of the
DEIR dated August 28, 1992; Responses to Comments Part I dated
December 7, 1992; Responses to Comments Part II dated December 21,
1992; Revisions to Part I of the Responses to Comments relating to the
Kit Fox; an Addendum to the DEIR dated May 4, 1992; and a DKS
Associates Traffic Study dated December 15, 1992) (SCH91103064), and an
Adendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report dated August 22,
1994.
(7) Not applicable.
(8)
2Refer to appropriate note on page 12
12
ISSUES FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT
The following issues have been found not to be significant as is
indicated by a "No" response on the Environmental Checklist. The
development will not produce significant adverse impacts for the
following reasons:
1. Earth: The topography of the site is relatively level with
minor surface variation; only minor grading, trenching, and
compacting of soils is required to complete the building
foundations, water mains, sewer lines, storm drains, and
pavement. No significant ground alteration will occur to produce
erosion or destruction of any unique features. No geologic
hazards are known or suspected to exist on the site or in
surrounding areas. Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report that will be
applied to this project in relation to this topic include
03.06/01.0; 03.06/02.0; 03.06/06.0; 03.06/07.0; 03.06/08.0;
03.06/11.0; 03.06/12.0; 03.06/14.0 - 03.06/16; 03.06/21;
03.06/25; and, 03.06/27, Inclusion of these mitigation measures
and corresponding conditions of approval will mitigate any
impacts in this topic area to a level of insignificance
2. Air: The Santa Rita Commercial Center project is a
commercial development, dependent upon automobile traffic and
therefore, automobile emissions will be generated. The FEIR
developed mitigation measures to reduce mobile and stationary
source emissions. Certain uses that might include stationary
source emissions or objectionable odors will be required to
obtain a Conditional Use Permit, which would require additional
environmental review. Since the project is a Commercial Center it
will not be creating or causing any climatic changes regionally
or locally. Additionally, uses within the Center will not be
discharging hazardous emissions. Mitigation Measures of the FEIR
that will be applied to this project in relation to this topic
include 03.11/02.0 - 03.11/4.0; 03.11/06.0; 03.11/07.0;
03.11/08.0; 03.11/09.0; and 03.11/13.0. Inclusion of these
mitigation measures and corresponding conditions of approval will
mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level of
insignificance.
3. Water: The project site does not cross over any water ways.
Although the project is adjacent to Tassajara Creek, it is set
back at least 100 feet from the top of the bank. A Master
Drainage Plan for the entire Santa Rita Area is required to be
prepared pursuant to the Specific Plan. Therefore, any changes
in drainage patterns and flooding will be fully evaluated in that
Plan to ensure there are no environmental impacts in this topic
area. DSRSD has indicated that they have water to supply the
project. Additionally, the minor trenching necessary for
improvements and construction of water utilities will not
interrupt or disturb any ground water flow. The FEIR contained
several mitigation measures which will be applied to this project
13
to mitigate any impacts in this area to a level of
insignificance as follows 03.05/44.0 through 03.05/55.0. Action
Programs 9T and 9U of the Specific Plan also mitigate these
impacts.
4. and 5. Plant and Animal Life: The project site is covered
primarily with annual grasses and does not provide unusual or
high quality habitat for any species of rare or endangered
species of plants or animals. According to the FEIR the site is
not in a biologically sensitive area, nor has the area been under
cultivation in the recent past. Although the FEIR did not
identify the site as having any endangered species of plants or
animal life, certain mitigation measures of the FEIR and Action
Programs of the Specific Plan have been included for this
project. These measures and corresponding conditions of approval
have been included to either protect any species that may be
discovered prior to or during construction or to protect
adjoining areas. The mitigation measures are: 3.07/01.0;
3.07/02.0; 03.07/03.03.07/05.0; 03.07/06.0; 3.07/07.0;
03.07/08.0; 03/07/09.0; 3.07/11.0 through 3.07/14.0; 3.07/16.0;
03.07/17.0; 03.07/18.0; 03.07/18.1; 03.07/19.0; 03.07/20.0;
03.07/21.0; 03.07/22.0; 03.07/26.0; 03.07/27.0 and 3.07/28.0.
The Action Programs are: 6A, 6E through 6H, 6N and 60.
Inclusion of these mitigation measures and action programs will
mitigate any impacts to a level of insignificance.
6. Noise: The noise impacts of potential projects in the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area were analyzed in the Eastern
Dublin Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") . The project
would result in increases in existing noise levels but would not
result in the exposure of people to severe noise levels.
Mitigation measures of the Eastern Dublin Specific plan that have
been applied to this project as conditions of approval in
relation to Noise include 3.10/05.0 and 3.10/07.0. These
mitigation measures would reduce any noise impacts of this
project to a level of insignificance.
7. LIGHT AND GLARE: The project will produce new light or
glare. These impacts will be reduced to a level of
insignificance by incorporating signage which conforms to the
Sign Ordinance of the City of Dublin and the design of the
project which will orient the main entrances of structures, and
signage at those entrances, inward toward the parking lot.
Parking and associated lighting will be located in the center of
the project and will not be directly visible off-site due to
screening by buildings and landscaping and by the use of
luminaires which reflect light downward and not off-site. These
measures will reduce the impacts of light and glare of this
project to a level of insignificance.
8. LAND USE. The project does not have an impact to Land Use
because it does not have the following impacts as described in
Guidelines Section 15002(g) :
14
a. The project will not disrupt or divide the physical
arrangement of an established community as there is no
established community and as the project is consistent with
the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan;
b. The project will not conflict with established
recreational, educational, religious, or scientific uses in
an area as there are no established recreational,
educational, religious or scientific uses in the area and as
the project is consistent with the Eastern Dublin General
Plan Amendment and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan;
c. The project will not convert prime agricultural land to
non-agricultural land or impair the productivity of prime
agricultural land as the project is not located on prime
agricultural land; and
d. The project will not conflict with adopted environmental
plans and goals of the community where it is located and, as
a result, cause "substantial change in the physical
conditions which exist in the area affected by the proposed
project" as the impacts of General Commercial land uses in
the project location were addressed in the FEIR and as the
project is consistent with the Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
CEQA Guidelines: Appendix I calls for an evaluation of potential
environmental impacts if a project would result in the
"substantial alteration" of the present or planned land use of an
area. "Substantial land use alteration", however, is not in
itself considered a significant environmental effect by CEQA.
9. NATURAL RESOURCES. The project will not result in an
increase in the rate of use of any natural resources or result in
the substantial depletion of any non-renewable natural resource
because no natural resources or renewable natural resources will
be removed, used or depleted by the project.
10. RISK OF UPSET. The project will not involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances in the event of
an accident or upset conditions because: 1) no hazardous
substances will be stored or handled in the proposed project; 2)
the application of mitigation measures from the FEIR of the
Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan as
conditions of approval, and 3) the application of Action Programs
of the Specific Plan as conditions of approval. The mitigation
measures are 03.04/01.0; 03.04/02.0; 03.04/04.0 through
03.04/13.0; 03.06/15.0; 03.06/16.0; and the action programs are
8D, 8E, 8G, 8H and 8J. The project will not involve the possible
interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan because it does not physically impact either
Dublin Boulevard or Interstate 580 and therefore would not block
those roadways in the event of collapse of the project. These
15
measures would reduce any impacts due to risk of upset of this
project to a level of insignificance.
11. POPULATION. The project will not alter the location,
distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of
an area because no humans inhabit the project site or will
inhabit the project site.
12. HOUSING. The project will not effect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing because no housing exists
on the project site or will exist on the project site and because
sufficient housing exists or will exist in the Dublin area for
employees of businesses within the project. The following
specific plan policies and action programs although not
applicable to this project because it is a commercial project and
not a residential project will encourage affordable housing:
Policies 4-7 through 4-10; and Programs 4F through 4I. The
following specific plan policies and action programs will help
Dublin achieve and maintain a balance of jobs and housing:
Policies 4-26 and 4-27 and Action Program 4K which will be a
condition of approval. These measures would reduce any impacts
to housing of this project to a level of insignificance.
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. The project without mitigation
would result in the generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement; demand for new parking; modifications to
existing transportation and traffic systems and alterations to
present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods. These impacts are mitigated by measures incorporated into
the attached Traffic Impact Analysis for the Regional Discount
Retail Center in Dublin California dated November, 1994, and by
the following Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin General
Plan Amendment and Specific Plan FEIR including an addendum to
the DEIR dated May 4, 1993 and an addendum to the FEIR dated
August 22, 1994; and Action Programs of the Specific Plan:
Mitigation Measures 03.03/01.0; 03.03/02.1 through 03.03/16.1
03.12/07.0; and Action Programs 5A through 5D and 5G which are
incorporated as conditions of approval of the project. In
addition, a traffic Impact Study prepared for this project
addresses the specific impacts of the Santa Rita Commercial
Center, Mitigation measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment and Specific Plan FEIR and of the Traffic Impact Study
are included as conditions of approval of the project and will
reduce impacts of the project to transportation/circulation to a
level of insignificance.
The project will not result in alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic because none of those facilities are near the
project. The project will not result in increases in traffic
hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians due to the
design of the project and incorporation of mitigation measures
which reduces those impacts to a level of insignificance.
16
14. Public Services: The Santa Rita Commercial Center will
require some of the improvements or service increases that were
planned for in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Mitigation
measures of the FEIR required certain studies be performed to
determine service and improvement needs at the time of
development of projects. Therefore, service or improvements
relating to fire and police protection, schools, parks,
government services and facilities will be determined by these
studies. The studies are presently being performed and will be
completed prior to the City and Applicant entering into a
Development Agreement. Prior to any development occurring in the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area, a Development Agreement is
required between the City and Applicant pursuant to the Eastern
Dublin Specific Plan. The Applicant's fair share of improvements
and increased service will be determined and contained in the
Development Agreement. Mitigation measures in the FEIR that will
be implemented as conditions of this project include: 03.12/05.0;
03.12/08.0; 03.04/02.0; 03.04/04.0; 03.04/06.0 through
03.04/13.0; 03.04/16.0; 03.04/17.0; 03.04/18.0; 03.04/20.0;
03.04/21.0; 03.04/22.0; 03.04/23.0; 03.04/24.0; 03.04/28.0;
3.04/29.0; 03.04/34.0 through 03.04/37.0. 03.04/49.0; 03.04/50.0;
and, 03.04/51.0. Action Programs of the Specific Plan that will
be implemented as conditions of this project include 40; 8A
through 8E; 8G; 8H; 8J; 8K; and 8N. Inclusion of these
mitigation measures and actions programs and corresponding
conditions of approval will mitigate any impacts in this topic
area to a level of insignificance.
15. Energy: The development proposed is for a commercial
center and would not use substantial amounts of energy.
Mitigation measures 03.04/45.0 and 03.04/46.0 relate to
demonstration projects of cost effective energy conservation
techniques and the incorporation of energy conservation measures
into the design, construction, and operation of the development.
These mitigation measures and their corresponding conditions of
approval will mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level
of insignificance.
16. Utilities: The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan anticipated and
planned for expansion of major utilities to the site. Although
expansion was planned, as development occurs, the location of the
lines will have to be determined.
The Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) has been
developing plans to serve the Santa Rita Commercial Center with
potable water and wastewater services and has the wastewater
capacity to serve this project. Figure 3 is a copy of the
proposed alternative routes for these services. These routes are
generally consistent with schematic routes shown in the FEIR.
The alternatives would either locate lines within an area already
disturbed by the BART construction project or replace existing
lines within the public right of way. Although some of the
improvements are outside of the Specific Plan Area, they are in
areas that are not environmentally sensitive because they are
17
located in disturbed areas. Additionally, the improvements
located within the Specific Plan Area are not indicated as
biologically sensitive in the FEIR. DSRSD will be required to
adhere to mitigation measures located in the FEIR to ensure that
no significant environmental impacts occur. These Mitigation
Measures are referenced at the end of this section of the Initial
Study and also within other sections of this Study.
The FEIR also considered solid waste, power and natural gas,
water, sewer, septic tanks and storm water drainage and developed
mitigation measures to ensure environmentally sensitive provision
of these services. The City's Site Development Review procedure
coordinates review of the site with the various utilities. At
that time, locations of structures and utilities will be more
clearly defined. Mitigation Measures were included in the FEIR
to ensure that the extension of DSRSD and other services would
not create significant environmental impacts. Inclusion of the
following implementing actions, action programs and mitigation
measures from the FEIR, and corresponding conditions of approval,
will mitigate any impacts to utilities to a level of
insignificance: Specific Plan Implementing Actions 11.2.10 and
11.3.3; Action Programs 6E through 6I; 8H; 8K; 8L; 9A through 9C;
9E through 9X; and Mitigation Measures 03.04/09.0; 03.04/37.0;
03.04/40.0; 03.04/41.0; 03.04/42.0; 03.04/43.0; 03.04/44.0;
03.05/01.0; 03.05/02.0; 03.05/03.0; 03.05/04.0; 03.05/05.0;
03.05/07.0; 03.05/07.1; 03.05/08.0; 03.05/09.0; 03.05/11.0 -
03.05/14; 03.05/20.0 - 03.05/28.0; 03.05/30.0 - 03.05/35.0;
03.05/37.0 - 03.05/39.0; 03.05/44.0 - 49.0; 03.07/09.0 through
03.07/12.0; 03.07/14.0; 03.07/17.0; 03.11/13.0; 03.12/03.0 and,
03.12/08.0.
17. Human Health: The project consists of primarily vacant land
that was previously developed with the Santa Rita Jail Facility.
In the southwest corner of the site, adjacent to Hacienda Drive
are the partial remains of the Madigan Building, which was a
portion of jail facility. A portion of the Madigan Building was
removed during the construction of Hacienda Drive. However,
building surveys have indicated that the remaining portion of the
building contains asbestos. Removal of the building will be
completed prior to construction on the site. Standard building
demolition practices require that removal of asbestos be
undertaken in a manner that will not endanger either the general
public's health nor that of the construction workers.
The site also had two underground storage tanks that have been
removed. Alameda County Environmental Health monitors the site
for a period of time after the removal of the tanks. At the
present time, the monitoring period has not been completed. As
part of the Site Development Review process, staff routinely
coordinates between the reviewing agencies to ensure that the
monitoring process is completed prior to issuing building permits
over the area. In general, commercial land use does not pose any
significant risk that substances and/or machinery stored will
create or expose people to health hazards. The list of permitted
18
and conditional uses has been designed so that there would not be
any impacts to human health from the development.
Mitigation Measures of the FEIR and Action Programs of the
Specific Plan and corresponding conditions of approval that would
apply to this area are as follows: 03.04/03.0; 03.04/05.0 through
03.04/09.0; 03.05/01.0; 03.05/03.0; 03.06/15.0; 03.06/16.0;
03.10/05.0; 03.10/07.0; 03.11/03.0; 03.11/07.0; 8E; 9P and 9Q.
Inclusion of these mitigation measures will mitigate any impacts
in this topic area to a level of insignificance.
18. Aesthetics: During the Site Development Review process, the
site plan and elevations are reviewed for many items, including
aesthetics. The City of Dublin has in place Site Development
Review Guidelines for use by the Applicant in the design of the
project. Additionally, the project layout has been designed so
that scenic vistas will not be blocked from I-580. Mitigation
Measures of the FEIR and Action Programs of the Specific Plan and
corresponding conditions of approval that will apply in this area
are as follows: 03.04/43.0; 03.07/06.0; 03.07/08.0; 03.08/07.1;
03.08/08.0; 03.08/08.1; 6R and 6Q. Inclusion of these mitigation
measures will mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level
of insignificance.
19. Recreation: Commercial developments are exempt from the
requirements of the Subdivision Map Act related to parkland
dedication or payment of fees in lieu thereof. However, the
improvement of parkland, open space and open space trail systems
is not restricted to residential development. The City is
preparing several studies that will identify community needs and
costs. The studies will examine improvements under this topic
area, among others. Policies in the General Plan and Specific
Plan require that development pay its fair share of costs to
maintain the same levels of service presently in place in the
City. Therefore, after the studies are completed, impact fees
will be ascertained and costs will be included in the Development
Agreement. As noted above, in Section No. 14, a Development
Agreement is required to be entered into between the City and
applicant. This is a requirement of the Specific Plan.
Mitigation Measures of the FEIR and Action Programs of the
Specific Plan and corresponding conditions of approval that would
apply in this area include: 03.04/20.0 - 03.04/24.0; 03.04/28.0;
03.04/29.0; 03.04/34.0; 03.04/35.0; 03.04/36.0; 03.07/13.0; 4P;
6A; 6B; 6G; and 9V. Inclusion of these mitigation measures will
mitigate any impacts in this topic area to a level of
insignificance.
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. The project will not result in the
alteration of or the destruction of a historic or historic
archaeological site. The Project will not result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric, historic, or
architecturally significant building, structure, or object. The
project does not have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values. The project
19
will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area. These impacts will not occur because of
Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment
and Specific Plan FEIR and an Action Program of the Specific Plan
have been incorporated as conditions of approval of this project.
Those Mitigation Measures and Action Program are as follows:
Mitigation Measures 03 . 09/01. 0 through 03 . 09/06. 0 and Action
Programs 6P_ and 7E.
Mandatory Findings of Significance
(a. ) : As discussed throughout the checklist form, but
specifically under the headings "Animal Life", "Plant Life", and
"Cultural Resources" , the project will not substantially degrade
the quality of the environment, reduce the habitat of a plant or
animal species or eliminate important examples of California
history or prehistory.
(b. ) : All potentially significant environmental impacts can
be mitigated to reduce both the long term and the short term
environmental impacts below a level of significance. A
description of the mitigation measures is listed below.
(c. ) : All potentially significant cumulative environmental
impacts have been addressed in the FEIR.
(d. ) : As discussed under the heading of "Risk of
Upset/Human Health", the Commercial land uses that have the
potential for the storage, handling and use of potentially
hazardous substances are subject to the requirements of the
Uniform Fire Code, Uniform Building Code, and the Alameda County
Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Plan. No business
licenses are issued to these business types until all
requirements have been satisfied.
/94001IS
•
20
HOMART PROJECT MATRIX
LEGEND
IT. NO.: (Item Number)
MIT. MEAS. NO.: (Mitigation Measure Number per Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan)
ACT. PROG. NO.: (Action Program Number per Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan)
LEAD: (City Department with primary responsibility)
PW Public Works
PL Planning
REC Recreation and Community Services
CM City Manager
PO Police
DRFA Dublin San Ramon Fire Authority
WHAT IS THE ACTION OR MEASURE: (A capsule summary or a task that
needs to be completed. For a complete description, see the Eastern
Dublin General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Final EIR and Mitigation
Monitoring Program.)
START/END: (When work on the action should begin; end)
PREZ Prezone
ANNE Annexation
REZO Rezone
TMAP Tentative Map
FMAP Final Map
BLDP Building Permit
SDR Site Development Review
CONT Continuous
FI/O Final Inspection/Occupancy
GRAD Grading Permit
TBD To be Determined
NA: (The Action or Measure is not applicable to the Project)
PROJ: (The Action/Measure is part of the Project)
COND: (The Action/Measure is a Condition of Approval)
ASAP: (The Action/Measure needs to be addressed as soon as possible)
ACTION TAKEN: (A capsule summary of the action taken or that needs to
be taken regarding the task)
COMPLETED: (Project Planner to enter 1) date, 2) initials, and 3) any
comments after the task is completed)
ISSUE: (Identifies the general topic of the task)
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
•
11 EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
( 4I f ASIT ACT L WHAT SS SHE; ACTION;aR MEASURE &TART gND N 8 C A ACTION TAICBN COFIkr ISS 4 r
sl�' AS° YROG A P.' ¢ S T,STL� Kg ' ` .
fix, NO - NO 'A O' N A 'Paa a'F•`
'. III J n p m ..
1 11.3 CM The City needs to further analyze potential PREZ BLDP X X The applicant is financing his own 4
.3 public financing techniques such as Assessment ANNE infrastructure and has not asked the
of Mello Roos Districts, Lighting, landscape REZO City for public financing assistance.
and Maintenance Districts or Geologic Hazards The City is analyzing public financing
Abatement Districts. techniques and as development occurs in
• the east area, will work with individual
applicants or groups of applicants, if )
requested, to provide information and
assistance in this area.
2 8C CM Encourage the school district(s) to use best PREZ BLDP X Write letter to school district. IVA8
efforts to qualify for and obtain state funding ANNE
assistance for the construction of new schools. _
3 4K PL Develop housing and employment monitoring TMAP CONT X X The City should set up a monitoring I03
programs. SDR program. A condition will require
provision of employment information by
a. Track residential growth in terms of unit employers.
type and price categories.
b. Track employment generating uses in terms
of number, type, and salary level of
employees in the planning area.
4 PL Prepare summary of implementation programs to CONT CONT X This matrix implements this mitigation VIVA1
assist development applications measure. ,
5 5H PW Work with developers at freeway interchanges FI/o CONT X Park and Ride should be located on west IIF4
1 to provide park and ride lots. Parking lots side of Hacienda per Eastern Dublin
will provide a minimum of 100 parking spaces Specific Plan. j
and will include lighting and landscaping.
6 7E CM Encourage local merchants to participate in TMAP CONT X City Manager needs to send a letter to IC5
programming and marketing special events in SDR the Chamber of Commerce.
public areas, such as open air markets, weekend
or lunch time concerts and seasonal
• celebrations.
1
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
�}}. CT
..: .:::•i::::::v.i. :'.•::•:•.'
•
•
•
7 5B PW Require review and approval of the following as REZO FI/O X Require condition for developers to IIA5
a condition of project approval for applicable TMAP provide.
projects in eastern Dublin: SDR
a) Public transit route and phasing plan, to be
prepared in consultation with LAVTA.
b) Bus turnouts and transit shelters, in
consultation with LAVTA.
c) Pedestrian paths between transit stops and
building entrances.
8 9W PW Require the developer to obtain proper SDR FI/O X See P. 137 of Specific Plan to develop VX7
approvals for storm drainage. condition.
9 4P RE Work with the East Bay Regional Parks District TMAP FMAP X X Begin working with EBRPD re staging area
to provide staging areas in the Specific Plan requirement for this site. Write
area. condition re: cooperation with EBRPD in
this process.
10 5A PW Submit detailed development plans that include TMAP FMAP X X Part of SDR Process. Require condition. IIBl
the standards for arterial streets, collector SDR BLDP
streets, residential streets, and industrial
roads.
•
•
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
T. Z
...:..:::
y.
11 6A PL Require review and approval of the following REZO FMAP X X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this IIIA1
elements as part of the application for TMAP BLDP project. The Development Agreement
proposed developments in eastern Dublin: SDR should provide for agreement with
Alameda County that when development
a. Clear and detailed identification of all occurs to the east all specific plan
potential open space areas. measures relating improvement of
b. Clear and detailed description of the Tassajara Creek should be required.
purpose and/ or function of open space areas City should begin coordinative effort to
and their relationship to other open space ensure that (c) occurs and that open
areas beyond the development of these areas; space plans are reviewed.
proposed treatment (i.e. , restoration,
revegetation, etc. ) of these areas; proposed
maintenance and emergency access provisions;
the proposed ownership of open space areas; and
the responsibility for their management and
maintenance.
c. Negotiated agreements with any public
agencies that are going to acquire, manage,
and/ or maintain open space as a result of the
project, or when private entities will be
responsible for open space management and
maintenance, a detailed set of codes,
covenants, and restrictions (i.e. , CC&R' s) that
set forth maintenance and management standards
and, responsibilities.
d. Review of open space plans by the City PD
and fire departments and other applicable
agencies (e.g. , Dept. of Fish & Game, Zone 7, • )
etc. ) to ensure compatibility with their
standards and practices.
12 6D PW Determine the appropriate funding mechanism(s) REZO FMAP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of the IIIA2
for on going maintenance of open space areas. TMAP BLDP project; therefore, the project does not
SDR _ include any open space.
13 6C PL Require open space lands that occur within REZO FMAP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of the IIIA3
development project be restricted to permanent TMAP BLDP project; therefore, the project does not
open space, with binding agreements established SDR include any open space.
with the City of Dublin to permanently protect
such areas.
3
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
T► :: T ..:.. .: W A
t�S A RF . ... ... . START . . n.... ... N.. .. .. . 7�C , A
tow .. .. :
A <:
: : 13:<
.4 6B PL Explore options for ownership and management of REZO FMAP X ' X Although Tassajara Creek is not a part IIIA6
areas set aside as open space. TMAP BLDP of the project, the City needs to begin
a. Encourage the East Bay Regional Park SDR discussions with the various agencies
Districtto accept ownership of the Tassajara regarding development and ownership.
Creek open space corridor. Additionally, in the development
b. Work with the Park District to develop agreement need to require dedication and
guidelines for management and uses in open development when property to the east
space areas. develops.
5 6I PW Negotiate the level of flood control TMAP FMAP X X Zone 7 is a reviewing agency on the IIIB5
improvements needed with Zone 7 to meet SDR BLDP project. Staff needs to continue
district standards and rightsofway requirements working with them in this area.
and maintenance responsibilities.
6 6J PW Establish a landscape maintenance district or TMAP FMAP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this IIIB6
other equivalent mechanism to cover the SDR BLDP project. The City will begin working on
longterm costs of maintaining public facilities a maintenance financing plan when
(i.e. , trails, benches, etc. ) along the stream improvement of the stream corridors
corridors. _ occurs and maintenance needs are known.
7 8I PL Ensure that an assessment district, homeowners REZO FMAP X Project is not in the foothills - area IVC9
association, or some other mechanism is in TMAP of concern in the Specific Plan.
place that will provide regular longterm
• maintenance of the urban/ open space interface. _
B 9R PW Require developers to obtain proper approvals TMAP FMAP X Write condition consistent with chart on VB2
for wastewater service. SDR BLDP P. 136 of Specific Plan.
.9 9G PW Require the developer to obtain proper approval TMAP FMAP X Write condition consistent with Chart on VR7
for water service. SDR BLDP P. 135 of Specific Plan.
0 9E PL DSRSD Standards. Require that design and TMAP FMAP X Condition that infrastructure conforms )
construction of all water and recycled water SDR GRAD to policies.
system facility improvements be in accordance
with DSRSD policies, standards, and master
plans.
1 11.3 CM Prepare and adopt a Master Development PREZ PREZ X The City has approved a Master VIIIA1
'.1 Agreement as a format for all future ANNE ANNE Development Agreement.
development agreements REZO REZO
2 4C PL Place a planned development district overlay PREZ PREZ X This project includes a rezone to a PD IA2
zone on the entire planning area. and will therefore meet the intent of
4C.
4
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
..m
K .. ..... A CT F W AT � � CTON..OR .M�A5II
R�. LRx � A C CTIp ,. KF _. A PP
. :.:: ..>•»:<:;.>:;.:>:
23 4E PL Review development applications for consistency PREZ PREZ X Project is not in the Livermore Airport IA4
with the Livermore Airport Protection Area. Protection Area.
24 - 7A PL Establish Design Review guidelines and PREZ SDR X The City s Site Development Review Idl
procedures and assign review responsibilities ANNE Guidelines follows procedures identified
for projects proposed in eastern Dublin. REZO in this action when reviewing Planned
Developments and SDR Applications.
25 7B PL Require development applicants to submit, at a PREZ SDR X These requirements are part of the IC2
minimum, the following materials for review: REZO application requirements for Planned
Existing Condition Map(s) , Design Concepts, Developments.
Site-Plans (Preliminary & Final) , Building
Design, and Special Concerns.
26 7C PL Establish a Master Streetscape Plan for the PREZ SDR X This project is located in the Hacienda IC3
Town Center Commercial area to include the REZO Gateway Area.
following elements: street tree planting plan,
paving standards, lighting standards, signage
standards, and amenities standards. _
27 7D PL Establish a working relationship with PREZ SDR X This project 'is located in the Hacienda IC4
developers in the Town Center to encourage REZO Gateway area.
joint development of public parking lots and
garages by area merchants and the City.
28 11.0 PL Require more specific Planned Development (PD) PREZ TMAP X This project includes a PD Rezone and 1
2.07 plans: Designs, sequencing, mitigation REZO SDR the applicant was required to submit
measures, etc. specific information as required for
_ that type of application.
29 11.2 PW Require infrastructure sequencing program as PREZ TMAP X The development agreement and 2
.10 part of Public Improvement Plans to allow ANNE SDR improvement plans will contain the
orderly development throughout Specific Plan REZO sequencing program. )
area. Road, sewer, water, drainage and other
utilities shall be prioritized and in place
prior to specific levels of development.
5
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
X* .... .. :ACC.. . .:�.... .: �.::�5:..: ,-I�. .I�. .: AC��9.N•:� :>::a> �<::>:::::z <>
.....:f..:... ... ...:.. ,.... ... .. ... M�A,S.NR�. .. .... .F. ....� . ...... N... .F!.
4.1WMA. Di...
30 4B PL Revise zoning regulations to meet Eastern PREZ TMAP X A) Not applicable, the project is not in IA1
4J Dublin plans and policies. ANNE SDR the campus office area.
4L REZO
a. Revise zoning regulations to permit B) The Santa Rita area combines many
residential uses in Campus Office designated uses. Although this project is not a
areas when development is consistent with "mixed use" project, it will have nearby
Specific Plan and does not result in adverse residential uses. ),
environmental impacts or service impacts.
b. Develop Commercial Mixed Use zoning that
accommodates a mix of retail office, service,
and residential uses in the Neighborhood and
General Commercial designated areas of eastern
Dublin.
31 4D PL Promote development agreements to ensure that PREZ TMAP X The project includes a development IA3
project is consistent with Specific Plan ANNE SDR agreement
policies and land use program. REZO _
32 4F PL Develop an inclusionary housing program which 1994 TMAP X This is a commercial project, not IB1
requires a minimum percentage of all approved SDR residential.
units to be affordable to very low, low, and
moderate income households. _
33 4G PL Explore possibility of establishing an in lieu 1994 TMAP X This relates to residential projects IB2
fee supporting below market rate housing SDR
development.
34 4I PL Develop a specific numeric goal for percentage 1994 TMAP X This relates to housing and not IB4
of affordable units in eastern Dublin which SDR commercial developments
should be ownership units, as opposed to rental /
units.
35 4A PL Require applicants to demonstrate that proposed PREZ TMAP X The written statement and proposal IF8
developments are in conformance with the ANNE SDR include information that indicates the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan policies and Land REZO project is in conformance with the
Use program. __ Specific Plan
36 5D PW Establish a bicycle circulation system to help PREZ TMAP X X A bike lane will be provided on Dublin IIC1
serve the need for nonmotorized transportation ANNE SDR Boulevard. Adequate setback areas are
and recreation in Dublin. REZO provided along the Creek for a future
trail. A condition will require bicycle
parking facilities at the Project.
6
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
s T1' 4 AGT k I.-,,, WN. T IS THE ACTION OR HEASURPr START^ END N P C A - ACTION TAKEN COHk,x�iISSUI'i s .
115 W glkoG1 L a 0
ff A R b 5 TTsTI# s z
0t. f3 0 3 A•y $ O N t zi &2 Op t
37 5C PW Require applicants to submit a detailed PREZ TMAP X The PD Rezone & SDR will include review IIC4
pedestrian circulation plan. The plan shall ANNE SDR of pedestrian transit facilities along
include the following components: Tassajara REZO Dublin Blvd. The Creek is not a part of
Creek Trail, Staging Area and Trailheads and this project but buildings will be
sidewalks. setback 150' from the Creek to allow for
future trail design.
38 5E PL Revise the City's existing zoning ordinance as PREZ TMAP X The project includes a PD Rezone which IIE1 `
5F needed to allow flexible parking standards in ANNE SDR establishes specific parking standards
eastern Dublin. REZO _ for this project.
39 9S PL Require the siting of wastewater system PREZ TMAP X Write condition of approval. VA7
infrastructure to be consistent with the ANNE SDR
Resource Management Policies of the Specific REZO
Plan.
40 9F PL Require the siting of water system PREZ TMAP X Condition that infrastructure conforms VR6
infrastructure to be consistent with the ANNE SDR to policies.
Resource Management Policies of the Specific REZO
Plan.
41 9v PL Coordinate modifications or enhancements to PREZ TMAP X Any modifications to the Creek will be VX6
creeks or the abutting riparian areas with the ANNE SDR required to go through the appropriate
required permitting agencies as necessary. REZO permitting agencies.
42 9X PL Require the siting of storm drainage PREZ TMAP X Storm drainage infrastructure shall be VX8
infrastructure be consistent with the Resource ANNE SDR designed in conjunction with Zone 7 and
Management policies of the Specific Plan. REZO will be consistent with these policies.
Zone 7 is a reviewing agency.
43 4H PL Develop a monitoring program that will track 1994 TMAP X This relates to housing and not
residential growth in Dublin in terms of unit SDR commerdial developments
type and price categories. Such a program will '
provide City decision-makers with data
necessary to make informed decisions relating
to City housing goals and development.
7
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
L T ...
.. .:::..
14 03.01 CM Resolve potential land use conflicts between CONT CONT X The City is doing all items on a IE1
/01.0 activities at Camp Parks and proposed uses in continuous basis.
the Project area.
a. Establish a liaison committee between
the City and the Army.
b. Establish a schedule for periodic {
meetings to discuss and provide /
updates on planning and development
efforts within the Project site and in •
Camp Parks.
c. Provide the base commander with a copy
of new development applications
adjacent to Camp Parks for review and
comment.
15 03.03 PW Caltrans in cooperation with local TMAP BLDP X Traffic study will examine this issue.
/01.0 jurisdictions could construct auxiliarry lanes SDR Payment of fee will be made a condition
on I-580 between Tassajara Road and Fallon Road of approval.
to provide a total of 10 lanes in that section,
consistent with the Caltrans Route Concept
Report for I-580.
46 03.03 5G PW Establish a Transportation Systems Management FI/0 CONT X The City adopted a TRO which would apply IIF4
/02.0 (TSM) Program. to this project.
47 03.03 PW Assist in the funding of improvements to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IID1
/02.1 regional transportation system. SDR for payment of fee.
48 03.03 PW Assist in funding the construction of auxiliary TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF12
/03.0 lanes on I580 between Tassajara and Airway SDR for payment of fee.
boulevards. )
49 03.03 PW Establish funding for construction of future TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF11
/04.0 I580/ I680 Interchange improvements. SDR for payment of fee.
50 03.03 PW Establish funding for construction of auxiliary TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF10
/05.0 lanes on I-580 east of Airway Blvd. SDR for payment of fee.
51 03.03 PW Ensure the funding and construction of TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF9
/06.0 improvements to the Dougherty Road/ Dublin SDR CONT for payment of fee.
Blvd. intersection as needed.
52 03.03 PW Provide improvements that will prevent TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF8
/07.0 congestion on the eastbound offramps from I580 SDR for payment of fee.
at Hacienda Drive. .
8
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
.. . � .WHO ... . ..�'k3�... CIO ::. > : - - .
._.�... . �. . :: ...:.: ,. ... .. ..: : . ... . . .. ... . .. .... ... : . ..:. ....... .......... 5 .fix.. .E N. .�' C. .A.. ....... .... X�GT�QN: ��KFN.... Fib
4.
D.
.. ..... ......... :..::.
53 03.03 PW Fund and implement improvements necessary to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF7
/08.0 ensure the efficient operation of the SDR for payment of fee.
intersection of Tassajara Road with the I580
westbound ramps.
54 03.03 PW Fund and implement improvements necessary to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF6
/09.0 ensure adequate service levels on Santa Rita SDR for payment of fee.
Road and I580 eastbound ramps.
55 03.03 PW Airway Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. The TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/10.0 City of Dublin shall implement improvements in SDR for payment of fee.
coordination with the City of Livermore to
modify the intersection to provide three
through lanes and a right-turn lane eastbound,
and two left-turn lanes and two through lanes
westbound. The Project shall constribute a
proportionate share of the improvement costs as
determined by a regional transportation study
such as the current study by the Tri-Valley
Transportation Council. These improvements
would provide LOS C conditions.
56 03.03 PW Fund and implement improvements necessary to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF5
/11.0 ensure adequate service levels at the SDR for payment of fee.
intersection of Airway Blvd. and the westbound
ramps.
57 03.03 PW Fund and implement improvements necessary to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF3
/12.0 ensure unimpeded movement of trucks to and from SDR for payment of fee.
the quarries on El Charro Road south of I-580.
•
9
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
•,,.,� ... ,..... ..... . .. . . �� .�c��or�.. t�...�����y sf�77����'t+. .... ...... ..... .............. ....... cmj� : �J*7[�...... .�•, may... ... ... .n. ... ... ... :........::.. ..
�...,i..... ...... :...../.. .:..:..:..... .. .... ............. ..i:llHP !r!.'ti:W.. .............. ................. ......... i.!.f�1�7'�-:.A.....AI h1N... .. F1... F . l'3 .... ..: .:.:::...... ... ..::.:....v...�...:.:. .:. '
.... -..... .. ,. .....; _,.. . :.: ..::. ... .::. : :. .!�. is
58 03.03 PW Cumulative impacts on Dublin Boulevard. The CONT BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement IIF2
/13.0 City of Dublin shall continue to participate in TMAP CONT for payment of fee.
regional studies of future transportation SDR
requirements, improvement alternatives and
funding programs, such as the current study by
the Tri-Valley Transportation Council.
Buildout of development outside of Eastern
Dublin beyond 2010 levels would require the
construction of grade-separated interchanges on
Dublin Boulevard and/or establishment of
alternative routes to redistribute traffic
flow. The project shall participate in the
implementation and funding of regional
transportation improvement programs as
determined by these regional studies. •
59 03.03 PW Reserve sufficient right of way along Tassajara TMAP FMAP X Part of traffic study and requirement to IIF1
/14.0 Road to accommodate cumulative development of SDR BLDP pay fee
projects north of the Project area. _
60 03.03 PW Extend transit service within 1/4 mile of 95% PREZ CONT X The City needs to coordinate and meet IIA1
/15.0 of the Project area population. 1994 ___ with LAVTA.
61 03.03 PW Provide transit service, at a minimum frequency REZO CONT X The City needs to coordinate and meet IIA2
/15. 1 of one bus every 30 minutes during peak hours, SDR with LAVTA.
to employment centers with 100 or more
employees.
62 03.03 PL Provide funding in support of expansion of TMAP FMAP X Staff needs to contact the transit IIA3
/15.2 transit service to the Project area. SDR authority regarding possible
participation by the developer. 1
63 03.03 PW Coordinate provision of feeder bus service to PREZ CONT X The City needs to coordinate and meet IIA4 J
/15.3 the planned BART stations from the Project 1994 with LAVTA.
area.
64 03.03 PL Provide a paved Class I bicycle/ pedestrian TMAP FMAP X To be contained in Development Agreement IIC2
/16.0 path along Tassajara Creek. SDR BLDP for county to provide at the time of
development of east side of Creek.
65 03.03 PW Provide for safe pedestrian/ bicycle crossings TMAP FMAP X Will be required if determined necessary IIC3
/16.1 of major arterial streets. SDR BLDP as part of SDR process.
66 03.04 PO Provide additional personnel, facilities, and PREZ CONT X A fiscal analysis is being prepared and IVB1
/01.0 procedures to PD service standards. its recommendations will be implemented
as conditions of the project. •
10
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
Z .. . .. *T {7
... A V J.4 TT �'�.77([77}�rmam..T ..I}f{ {�. m . �y :. .: ... -' _.' .:. .
. . . TARS ND.. :-. - :: .. :. ;; , ... ... ....
tiCW'OHAS ... .. ,.::...: :.:
. .... .. .. . .........:: .:: . ...
167 03.04 8D PO Provide the PD Dept. information needed to PREZ CONT X The Dublin Police Department is the IVB2
/02.0 adequately plan for expansion of services. ANNE reviewing agency for this project.
Coordinate with the City PD Department Additionally, a fiscal analysis was
regarding the timing of annexation and proposed prepared and its recommendations will be
development, so that the Department can made conditions of the project approval.
adequately plan for the necessary expansion of `
services to the area. )
68 03.04 PO Provide for PD Dept. input into the design of TMAP FMAP . X Police Dept. is a reviewing agency on IVB3 p
/03.0 proposed development. SDR BLDP the project.
69 03.04 PO Prepare a budget strategy to hire the required CONT CONT X A fiscal analysis was prepared and its IVB4
/04.0 additional personnel and implement necessary recommendations will be made conditions
changes in the "beat" system. of project approval.
70 03.04 8E PO Ensure PD Dept. review of proposed development TMAP BLDP X The Police Dept. should review items in IVB5
/05.0 for safety issues. Incorporate into the SDR DEIR and make sure that they comment on
requirements of project approval PD Dept. those specific items as well as their
recommendations on project design that affect usual areas. Need a letter from the
traffic safety and crime prevention. Police specifically saying they are
reviewing items 3.4/5.0
71 03.04 FR Provide for the construction of new fire TMAP FI/0 X X Require condition for provision of fire IVC1
/06.0 facilities coincident with new service demand sDR service to the project. Enter into an
in eastern Dublin. agreement with Alameda County for
interim fire facility on the Santa Rita
Property.
72 03.04 CM Establish appropriate funding mechanisms (e.g. TMAP FI/0 X X The applicant will be financing its own IVC2
/07.0 Mello Roos District, developer financing with SDR infrastructue. They will either
reimbursement agreements,. ect. ) to cover construct the facilities, pay impact
upfront costs of capital ' improvements (i.e. fees, and/or enter into reimbursement )
fire stations and related facilities and agreements.
equipment) .
73 03.04 8G FR Ensure acquisition of sites for construction of TMAP FI/O X X Condition requiring fire service to the IVC3
/08.0 new fire stations. SDR site. Additionally, staff needs to work
with District on provision of station
site.
~
74 03.04 8H FR Ensure DRFA input on project design relating to TMAP SDR X X Part of project review process. IVC4
/09.0 access, water pressure, fire safety and SDR FMAP Condition assuring compliance with DRFA
prevention. _ requirements.
75 03.04 FR Ensure that a mechanism is in place to provide TMAP FMAP X Mechanisms shall be in place to provide IVC5
/10.0 long term maintenance for safe fire conditions SDR BLDP regular long-term maintenance of the •
along the urban/open space interface. urban/open space interface •
11
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
T...l ...TMWACC �p ..O ,;: SU ;;
__.. ._R..MF..1:1 R� ; ..
MW46WWIWggWWgOnmXOMgMmmgmmgnmannmmqPeOvnHM -OIPS'tE*gWMgaWMNWnMWMWnMMMftO'ONWMWMMg='ftn'O:
76 03.04 8J FR Integrate fire trails and fire breaks into the TMAP FMAP X Condition that access road be required IVC6
/11.0 open space trail system. SDR BLDP to DRFA standards. Needs will be
a. Meet fire district standards for access determined during SDR, fire authority is
roads in the open space trail system while part of review process.
minimizing environmental impacts.
77 03.04 FR Prepare a wildfire management plan for the PREZ BLDP X The fire district reviewes at the time IVC7
/12.0 Project area in order to reduce the risk of ANNE of Site Development Review and comments
impact related to wild land fire on each project. At that time a plan is
prepared by the district on a project by
project basis as needed.
78 03.04 FR Determine the number, location and timing of PREZ BLDP X Fire protection for the project area and IVC8
/13.0 additional fire stations for areas within the ANNE other surrounding areas are being
Project area yet outside the Specific Plan area analyzed as part of the project's fiscal
analysis. A condition for provision of
fire service will be required.
79 03.04 PL Reserve school sites within the Project area as TMAP FMAP X No school sites were indicated on this IVA1
/13.1 designated in the Specific Plan and General SDR BLDP site in the Specific Plan.
Plan Amendment (Please note: This mitigation Additionally, the school district is one
measure has been renumbered as 3.4/ 13.1 versus of the reviewing agencies.
3.4/ 13.0 because it is identically numbered as
the mitigation measure regarding Sites for Fire
Facilities for GPA Increment) .
180 03.04 PL Ensure that adequate capacity is provided for TMAP FMAP X No school sites were indicated on this IVA2
1 /14.0 junior high school age students. SDR BLDP site in the Specific Plan.
Additionally, the school district is one
of the reviewing agencies.
81 03.04 PL Ensure that adequate classroom space is TMAP FI/o X No school sites are indicated on this IVA3
/15.0 provided prior to the development of new homes. SDR site in the Specific Plan. The project
does not involve residential
development.
' 82 03.04 BA PL Work with the Dublin Unified School District 1995 FI/0 X X Need documentation for the file that we IVA4
/16.0 and the Livermore Joint Unified School District REZO are doing this. However, this project
to resolve the jurisdictional issue regarding is commercial and the service issues do
which district(s) should serve the eastern not directly apply.
Dublin planning area.
a. Determine the service district arrangement
that best serves the needs of planning area •
students and minimizes the fiscal burden of the
service providers.
12
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
,..:.:..... ._ ...... .. :.:.:........ . . S �:.:; END.::....::. ..: :.: .
•
83 03.04 PL Ensure that adequate school facilities are REZO - CONT X DUSD is a reviewing agency on this IVAS
/17.0 available prior to development in the Project project.They have indicated that the
area to the extent permitted by law. Sterling Fee will adequately mitigate
impacts from this development. Need
condition requiring payment of fees. _
84 03.04 8B PL Ensure that the development of new school TMAP FMAP X Condition of approval to pay Sterling IVA6/18.0 facilities is provided for through the SDR BLDP fees (letter from DUSD indicated those )
dedication of school sites and/ or payment of fees would provide all needed mitigation
development fees by developers, or by any other from this project. )
mean permitted by law.
85 03.04 8F CM Establish appropriate funding mechanisms, such PREZ BLDP X The DUSD indicated by letter that this IVA7
/19.0 as Mello Roos Community Facilities District, ANNE project does not adversely impact the
development impact fees, or a general District and that impacts can be
obligation bond measure, to fund new school mitigated through payment of the
development in eastern Dublin. standard school fee (Sterling Fee) by
letter dated 9/23/94) .
86 03.04 RE Expand park area throughout the Primary and CONT CONT X X The Public Facilities Fee Study will
/20.0 Extended Planning Areas to serve new examine the impacts on parkland and
development. whether this project should participate
in acquiring , improving or maintaining
them. If applicable, these issues will
be negotiated in a development agreement
and this will be made a condition of
approval.
87 03.04 RE Maintain and improve outdoor facilities in CONT CONT X X The Public Facilities Fee Study will
/21.0 conformance with the recommendations of the examine the impacts on parkland and
City's Park and recreation Master Plan 1992. whether this project should participate
)
in acquiring, improving or maintaining
them. If applicable, these issues will
be negotiated in a development agreement
and this will be made a condition of
approval.
88 03.04 RE Provide active parks and facilities which are CONT CONT X X The Public Facilities Fee Study will
/22.0 adequate to meet citywide needs for open space, examine the impacts on parkland and
cultural, and sports facilities, as well as the whether this project should participate
local needs of the Eastern Extended Planning in acquiring, improving or maintaining
Area. them. If applicable, these issues will
be negotiated in a development agreement .
and this will be made a condition of .
approval.
13
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
IT'= lSIT F'AGT. L WNAT X$ THE ACTION OR MEAsURP START ENO N P C A ACTION TAKEN ; COMI— ISSUP
HB 148A5., Pkac E A R a s T.ETED
•
• D € n PI .. o.._
89 03.04 RE Acquire and improve parklands in conformance CONT CONT X X The Public Facilities Fee Study will ID1
/23.0 with the priorities and phasing recommended in examine the impacts on parkland and
the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. whether this project should participate
in acquiring, improving or maintaining
them. If applicable, these issues will
be negotiated in a development agreement ,l
and this will be made a condition of /
approval.
90 03.04 PL Require land dedication and improvements for TMAP FMAP X X No dedication will be required of this ID2
/24.0 the 25 parks s designated in the General Plan applicant, however, improvement needs
Amendment (GPA) and collect in lieu fees per will be addressed thorugh the Public
city standard. Facilities Fee Study which is being
prepared by the City. Idenfitied needs
will be negotiated in the development
agreement and this will be made a
condition of approval.
91 03.04 ' PL Provide an adequate ratio of developed TMAP FMAP X Accomplished in the Specific Plan. This
/25.0 parklands to population. project (commercial) is not required to
dedicate parkland per policies.
_
92 03.04 PL Designate sites for 17 parks in the Specific TMAP FMAP X Accomplished in the Specific Plan. This ID3
/26.0 Plan area and 8 additional sites in the General project (commercial) is not required to
Plan Amendment Extension to ensure maintenance dedicate parkland per policies.
of the City's parks provision standard..
93 03.04 RE Ensure that park development is consistent with TMAP FMAP X Park Master Plan incorporated Eastern ID4
/27.0 the standards and phasing recommended in the Dublin recreation and open apace
City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. concepts.
94 03.04 PL Ensure the provision of open space, access and TMAP FMAP X Include provision in Development ID5
/28.0 areas for public recreation. Agreement regarding dedication of the
stream corridor at the time the eastern
side of creek develops. This will be a
condition of approval.
95 03.04 PL Ensure that each new development reserves the TMAP FMAP X Requirement for development agreement so ID6
/29.0 open space and parkland designated in the Plan. that County will dedicate open space
area at time of development of east
parcel. Also Tassajara Creek is not a
part of the project but adequate
setbacks have been designated to reserve
open space. This will be made a .
condition of approval.
14
•
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MrTfdArION MEASUkEd/ACTItN: PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
. ... _ . .S H .. . .. .,,.. . , ...... . ... . ::... , ENT .,.:. . .: .: CT. ri
2dCtr<s :1A.:
96 03.04 4M RE Develop a Parks Implementation Plan for eastern TMAP FMAP X The Park Master Plan includes this. ID7
/30.0 Dublin that identifies the following: 1995
preferred phasing of land dedication and
improvements, facilities priorities and their
location, and the design and construction of
parks.
97 03.04 4N PL Calculate and assess in lieu park fees based on TMAP FMAP X Not a residential project. ID8 )
/31.0 Dublin's parkland and dedication ordinance.
98 03.04 PL Establish a trail system with connections to TMAP FMAP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this
/32.0 planned regional and subregional system, SDR BLDP project. The City will begin working on
including the north-south corridors such as a maintenance financing plan when
EBRPD' s proposed trail along Tassajara Creek improvment of the stream corridor occurs
• north to Mount Diablo State Park. and the maintenance needs are known.
99 03.04 PL Establish a comprehensive, integrated trail TMAP FMAP X Accomplished by the Specific Plan and IIIA4
/33.0 network that permits safe and convenient SDR BLDP Parks Master Plan.
pedestrian and bicycle access.
100 03.04 PL Establish a continuous open space network that TMAP FMAP X Established in the Specific Plan and IIIA7
/34.0 integrates large natural open space areas, SDR BLDP Parks Master Plan. Need provision in
stream corridors, and developed parks and the development agreement for dedication
recreation areas. of steam corridor. This will be made a
condition of approval.
101 03.04 PL Provide convenient pedestrian connections TMAP FMAP X Contact EBRPD regarding staging areas•. IIIAB
/35.0 between developed areas and designated open SDR BLDP for Tassajara Creek Trail.
space areas and trails. _
102 03.04 40 PL Require developers to dedicate public access TMAP FMAP X Include provisions in the development IIIAS
/36.0 easements along ridge tops and stream corridors SDR BLDP agreement for dedication of stream '`
to accommodate the development of trails and corridor. /
staging areas.
15
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
WH ...5 _. THE A . :9 5 IAii ...:._: ..:.:..:...,.., . •:..::
C�S�ON. _.R...M ..t�R ........ .:,.. . .::.:.... ..::::::::: :
.... .. _. __._... .TAil .......:. ..... .. .. ........... .. .... ........ . ..... � Ti.. .P... ..C. b1:. .:..:.,...::..... .:::..... .. ... CTION A N ;: ;.CO .
PROG ...... :::,
.03 03.04 8K CM Prepare a Solid Waste Management Plan for 1995/ BLDP X X Prepare SWMP update for Eastern Dublin. VAA1
/37.0 Eastern Dublin, meeting the requirements of the 1996 This project will not exceed thresholds
adopted City SRRE, which includes: of current SRRE. Therefore, preparation
1. A requirement for the City to compost all of an update prior to project approval
organic wastes resulting from the ongoing is not necessary. Require condition of
maintenance of public parkis and open space. approval to ensure compliance with
2. extension of Dublin's curbside recycling requirements of the SWMP and SRRE . )
program for recyclable materials.
3. Specific areas designated for the
collection of recyclable materials in multi-
family and commercial areas, with coordination
•
as needed for pick-up.
4. Support for re-use of composted materials
in landscaped areas of all new development. _
.04 03.04 CM Revise waste generation projections of Dublin' s 1995/ BLDP X Current SRRE accomodates Homart. VAA2
/38.0 SRRE/ HHWE as needed to reflect the population 1996
and commercial land use projections of the
adopted Protect.
l05 03.04 CM Ensure that the Solid Waste Management Plan for 1995/ BLDP X City needs to prepare SWMP, however, the VAA3
/39.0 Eastern Dublin addresses and incorporates the 1996 current SRRE includes Homart Project.
goals, objectives, and programs of Dublin' s
SRREE and HHWE.
l06 03.04 CM Ensure that adequate landfill capacity is TMAP FMAP X Require will serve letter VAA4
/40.0 available to accommodate project waste. SDR BLDP
l07 03.04 8L PL Have project applicants provide documentation REZO FMAP X Require will serve letter. IVD1
/41.0 that electric, gas, and telephone service can TMAP BLDP
be provided to all new development.
l08 03.04 PW . Require all utilities be located below grade BLDP FI/O X X Write condition, also City should begin IVD2
/42.0 where feasible and designed to City standards. contacting major utilities regarding
their master plans for the area.
,09 03.04 PW Work with PG&E to plan the undergrounding of SDR FMAP X Staff needs to begin meetings with PG&E IVD3 1
/43.0 all new electric lines and to route BLDP regarding provision of utilities and
infrastructure away from sensitive habitat and their location in relation to this
open space lands to mitigate the effects of mitigation measure.
utilities expansion. •
110 03.04 PI. Require project applicants to submit a FMAP BLDP X Need condition. IVD4
/44.0 utilities service report to the City prior to
Public Improvement Plan approval.
16
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
T.
A ?1GTQtKN . . . o
......
111 03.04 PL Require the installation of a demonstration TMAP FI/O X Require project to use energy IVD5
/45.0 project(s) of cost effective energy SDR conservation techniques as identified in
conservation techniques. building code. Also, encourage other
___ energy saving techniques.
112 03.04 PL Require developers to demonstrate the TMAP BLDP X X Part of project review will be to IVD6
/46.0 incorporation of energy conservation measures SDR analyze these issues and require
into the design, construction, and operation of compliance with current energy
)
proposed development. standards.
113 03.04 PL Encourage and support the efforts of the U.S. TMAP FMAP X This project is not in the Towncenter.
/47.0 Postal Service to establish a post office with SDR BLDP
the eastern Dublin Town Center.
114 03.04 8M PL Coordinate with the U.S. Postal Service to TMAP FMAP___ X Contacting the post office regarding the IVE2
/48.0 identify facility needs and site criteria for a SDR BLDP location in the Town Center should not
new post office in Eastern Dublin, and direct begin until the street layouts are known
the land owner/developer of the in that area.
Public/Semipublic area designated in the Town
Center to explore the potential for a post
office in this location.
115 03.04 RE Encourage and support the efforts of the PREZ FMAP X City needs to write a letter.
/49.0 Alameda County Library System to establish a ANNE BLDP
library(ies) and associated services for REZO
Eastern Dublin as determined to be appropriate
given the size and population of the planning
area.
116 03.04 8N RE Coordinate with Alameda County to provide PREZ FMAP X City needs to write a letter. IVE3
/50.0 library services to Eastern Dublin. ANNE BLDP
REZO ___ )
117 03.04 RE Require the City Library Task Force identify PREZ FMAP X The project is not in a site that was IVE4
/51.0 appropriate location and timing for development ANNE BLDP identified as a possible library
of new library(ies) . REZO location in the Specific Plan. However,
the City need to begin working with the
task force in this area.
118 03.05 9Q PW Require that all development within the TMAP FMAP X Need will serve letter and condition VA2
/01.0 Specific Plan be connected to public sewers. SDR BLDP that the project be connected. DSRSD
Exceptions to this requirement, in particular Code prohibits the use of septic or non-
septic tank systems, will only be allowed on a public sewer systems for any commercial
case by case basis upon receipt of written project (per Letter to The City of
•
approval from Alameda County Environmental Dublin dated November 3, 1994) .
Health Dept. and DSRSD.
17
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
2'. ;�i S
ME R... A_trR�
. . .. . .MOR
.:..: :.... ...........
.::.>.:.::: ..NO. :.NCB. -
.:::..::.:::..:. .
119 03.05 9J PW Have DSRSD update its wastewater collection PREZ TMAP X X DSRSD has already prepared the Eastern VA3
/02.0 system master plan computer model to reflect ANNE SDR Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
the adopted Specific Plan/GPA. Projects must RE'I.O dated December, 1993, (Dodson and
pay for design level wastewater collection Associates) to provide the updated
system master plan computer model. (ARIII, P. computer simulations and master plan
819) analyses for wastewater collection and
potable and recycled water systems.
Alameda County funded the Dodson Study
in part.Applicant shall install required
__ facilities as a condition of approval.
120 03.05 9P PW Discourage the use of onsite package plants and CONT TMAP X Project will be required to hook into VA4
/03.0 septic systems within the Project area in SDR public utilities and water/wastewater
accordance with policies of the San Francisco systems. '
Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board.
121 03.05 9N PW Wastewater. Require a "will serve" letter from TMAP FMAP X Conditions regarding provision of will
/04.0 DSRSD prior to permit approval for grading. SDR GRAD serve letters for wastewater.
122 03.05 90 PW Require design and construction of all BLDP FI/O X Standard condition regarding approval by VA6
/05.0 wastewater systems to be in accordance with DSRSD of wastewater systems.
DSRSD service policies, procedures, design and
construction standards and master plans.
123 03.05 PW Ensure that the planned wastewater collection TMAP FMAP X The Eastern Dublin Facilities Plan VF1
/06.0 system has been sized to accommodate only the SDR prepared by DSRSD provides pipeline
development within the Eastern Dublin General sizing only to accommodate development
Plan and Specific Plan area. within the Specific Plan area and areas
located between the Specific Plan's west
boundary and existing development within )
the City. No oversizing for areas east
or north of the Specific Plan have been
included (per letter to The City of
Dublin from DSRSD dated November 3,
1994) .
124 03.05 9M PW Require project applicants to prepare detailed TMAP FMAP X Need to require from applicant as part VB1
/07.0 wastewater capacity investigations, including SDR of the tentative map conditions of
means to minimize wastewater flows, to approval.
supplement the information in the Specific
Plan.
125 03.05 PW TWA. Require a "will serve" letter from DSRSD TMAP FMAP X Conditions regarding provision of will •
/07.1 prior to permit approval for grading. SDR GRAD serve letters for wastewater service via
TWA.
18
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
' 1E'• # M< .... .I3T T. ' .WH 5 `rkJEi G.x�Q N.<CyREA 5� .... ...M _ URA. ; T.. Nh........ - : ; :. A
OG >L _ ... .
A
126 03.05 PW Ensure that wastewater treatment and disposal PREZ TMAP X Require a will serve letter. VC1
/08.0 facilities are available to meet the needs of ANNE SDR
future development in eastern Dublin. REZO
127 03.05 PW Ensure that proposed development is consistent TMAP FMAP X A will serve letter will be required to VC2
/09.0 with wastewater treatment plant expansion as SDR BLDP ensure this. Additionally, DSRSD is a
set forth in DSRSD's master plan. reviewing agency on the project. No
expansion of the DSRSD wastewater )
treatment plant is necessary to
accommodate this project (per letter to
• The City of Dublin from DSRSD dated
November 3, 1994) .
128 03.05 PW Include energy efficient treatment systems in CONT CONT X Per ARIII, P. 821, No expansion is VD1
/10.0 any wastewater treatment plant expansion and required as a result of this project.
operate the plant to take advantage of offpeak
energy .
129 03.05 9I CM Support LAVWMA and DSRSD in their current CONT TMAP X Need to write letters. VG1
/11.0 efforts to implement a new wastewater export SDR
pipeline system.
130 03.05 PW Require recycled water use or landscape TMAP CONT X J Condition re: recycled water in VG2
/12.0 irrigation in accordance with DSRSD' s Recycled SDR landscaping plan - provide for •
Water Policy per AR III pg. 821. __ infrastructure in improvement plans.
131 03.05 9K PW Require development within this project to fund PREZ TMAP X DSRSD has already prepared the Eastern VG3
/13.0 a recycled water distribution system computer ANNE SDR Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
model to reflect the adopted Specific Plan/ REZO dated December, 1993, (Dodson and
GPA. (ARIII, P. 821) Associates) to provide the updated
computer simulations and master plan
analyses for wastewater collection and )
potable and recycled water systems.
Alameda County funded the Dodson Study
in part. Applicant shall install
required facilities as a condition of •
approval.
132 03.05 9L PW Support the efforts of the Tri Valley Water PREZ CONT X X Condition re: recycled water in project. VG4
/14.0 Recycling Task Force Study through Zone 7, ANNE Also write letter to Zone 7.
encouraging wastewater recycling and reuse for REZO
landscape irrigation. _
133 03.05 PW Encourage LAVWMA to continue its program of PREZ CONT X The City wrote a letter to LAVWMA on VE1
/15.0 offpeak pumping of wastewater to balance ANNE 10/3/94 verifying a phone call verifying •
electric demands in the PG&E system REZO this policy and encouraging them to •
continue it.
19
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
: .A.r,g% . .T . H N;:. -
EU
R... .. . �� ;>.......... .. .. ... TAP. :il..,EN _: ;:..
. D
1, 134 03.05 PW Ensure that the recycled water treatment system PREZ CONT X The City needs to write a letter to VE2
/16.0 is planned, designed and constructed for energy ANNE DSRSD reminding them of the requirement
-..]
efficiency in operation) . REZO of this Mitigation Measure.
I135 03.05 PW Avoid potential failure in the operation of the TBD TBD X Reference TWA DEIR (see page 3.5-10 of VH1
/17.0 pumps in the TWA wastewater collection system. Eastern Dublin DEIR) .
136 03.05 PW Ensure that pump station design minimizes TBD TBD X Reference TWA DEIR (see page 3.5-10 of VI1
/18.0 potential for impacts related to noise and Eastern Dublin DEIR) .
odors. I
137 03.05 PW Ensure that wastewater storage basins are TBD TBD X Reference TWA DEIR (see page 3.5-10 of VJ1
/19.0 designed to control odors and minimize the risk Eastern Dublin DEIR) . DSRSD stated in a
of failure in the event of an earthquake. letter to The City of Dublin dated
November 3, 1994, that the District is
not at this time proposing a TWA
wastewater export project involving
pumping and export of raw wastewater and
thus wastewater storage basins are not
anticipated for tis project. The entire
wastewater collection system needed for
this project will be a gravity system
flowing to the existing District pump
station facilities located south of I-
1 580.
I138 03.05 PW Require that construction of the recycled water TBD TBD X Need to write condition. VK1
/20.0 distribution system be in accordance with all
applicable State and local regulations. _
--
I 139 03.05 PW Ensure that reservoir construction meets all TBD TBD X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of VL1
/21.0 applicable standards of DSRSD and appropriate Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that in
health agencies. accordance with the Policy on Major
•
Infrastructure adopted by the District,
all major facilites are designed and
built by the District and thus will
adhere to all District standards. All
health standard will be required to be
met.
20
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
x M i CT. : ..._ ::WHA :.:1S..7H CT O N0 :.;.:M SUR . ,:.; lAR END- ; Q. A;
:
140 03.05 PW Require the proposed recycled water pump TBD TBD X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of VM1
/22.0 stations meet to meet all applicable standards Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that as
of DSRSD. AR III pg. 823. the owner and operator of all on and oo-
site recycled water facilities needed
for this project, the District will
ensure that all such facilities shll
meet all applicable standards.
141 03.05 PW Ensure that recycled water projects meet any TBD TBD X Staff will work with Zone 7 when they VN1
/23.0 applicable salt mitigation requirements of Zone begin design of any recycled water
)
7. project for this area. Staff should
_ write letter.
142 03.05 PW Expand DSRSD service boundaries to encompass PREZ TMAP X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of Vol
/24.0 the entire eastern Dublin Specific Plan/ GPA ANNE SDR Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that the
area. REZO project site is already located within
the District boundaries.
143 03.05 PW Encourage all development in the Project area TMAP FMAP X Condition for provision of will serve VO2
/25.0 to connect to the DSRSD water system. SDR BLDP letter.
144 03.05 9A PW Require water conservation measures to be TMAP FMAP X Require water conservation methods VP1 •
/26.0 designed into individual projects. SDR BLDP identified in DEIR & FEIR be
incorporated into project per City Water
_ Conservation Ordinance.
145 03.05 PW Require a recycled water distribution system be TMAP FMAP X Write condition regarding DSRSD comment VP2
/27.0 incorporated into individual projects. SDR BLDP letter.
146 03.05 9B PW Ensure that Zone 7 has water supply needed to TMAP FMAP X Require will serve letter. Get copy of VP3
/28.0 meet requirements of the Project. SDR BLDP contract or letter from Zone 7 regarding
contract for file.
147 03.05 9D PW Zone 7 and DSRSD should construct two TMAP CONT X This project will not present a demand - VP4
/29.0 additional turnouts from the Zone 7 Cross SDR which would require the construction of
Valley Pipeline to serve the Eastern Dublin either turnout at this time.
)
area.
148 03.05 PW Provide for increased water source reliability, CONT CONT X Plans submitted by DSRSD indicate design VP5
/30.0 the Project water system should be is in accordance with this mitigation
interconnected with existing adjoining systems. measure. DSRSD will construct
facilities recommended by the Dodson
study. May need a condition regarding
an easement across Homart property along
Tassajara Creek and I-580 per DSRSD
comment letter.
21
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
IT MIT ACT L WHAT IS THE ACTION OR MEASURE START END N P 0 A ACTION TAKEN GOMI' ¢ ISS,Ti 1463 14VAS VROG E
���E yNC �� !? b; h O N A T,T2LU�:13 4'�� ��
w
149 03.05 PW Provide a backup source of water supply to its TBD TBD X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of VP6
/31.0 Zone 7 source. DSRSD will reimburse City of Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that it
Pleasanton for construction and operation of acknowledges that the backup water
new groundwater wells south of the Project area supply source is desireable for ultimate
build-out of the Specific Plan area.
The scope of this project, however, does
not warrant a backup supply source from
outside the District service area. The
District has recently signed a new water J
supply contract with Zone 7 which
specifies the Zone will provide all wter
requested for the Specific Plan Area
within the constraints of its ability to
do so. The Distric does not currently
anticipate obtaining any water supply
from the City of Pleasanton's well
project referenced in the Mitigation
Measure. The District anticipated=s
providing significant amounts of
recycled water to landscaping
improvements to this and future projects
in the area.
150 03.05 PW Establish a phasing for water treatment system TBD TOD X Check with Zone 7 re: status of phasing VQ1
/32.0 improvements to meet increasing demands on its plan listed in DEIR. Staff should write
_ water system. letter.
151 03.05 PW Require DSRSD construction of two new TBD TBD X Write status letter on western turnout VQ2
/33.0 chlorination/ fluoridation stations at the two and chlorination/fluoridation station
proposed Zone 7 turnouts to eastern Dublin to status to DSRSD and Zone 7 j
meet increased demand resulting from the \
project. r
22
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
....... . . .._ ::: -WHAT H START END ,.. .
Na.. .PI=0
:.N
1)
152 03.05 PW Provide an adequate water supply system and TMAP GRAD X Require will serve letter. DSRSD is VR1
/34.0 related improvements and storage facilities for SDR BLDP currently completing an engineering
all new development in the Project area. analysis of interim water distribution
qnd storage alternatives to adequately
supply the proposed project while
providing facilities which can be
incorporated successfully into the
ultimate system required to accommodatd 1
build-out of the Santa Rita area and
adjacent properties. The results of
this analysis will indicate any required
storage facilities which will become
requirements of the provision of
service. At this time DSRSD states that
it does not appear that new storage
facilities will be necessary for this
development. The existing Zone 7
turnout to Alameda County will be
utilized (per letter to The City of
Dublin from DSRSD dated November 3,
1994) .
153 03.05 9C PW Ensure that DSRSD updates its water system PREZ TMAP X X DSRSD has already prepared the Eastern VR2
/35.0 master plan computer model to reflect the ANNE SDR Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
adopted Specific Plan/GPA land uses. REZO dated December, 1993, (Dodson and
Development must pay cost. Associates) to provide the updated
computer simulations and master plan
analyses for wastewater collection and
potable and recycled water systems.
Alameda County funded the Dodson Study
in part. Applicant shall install
required facilities as a condition of
approval.
154 03.05 PW Consolidate the Camp Parks and Alameda County CONT CONT X Plans submitted by DSRSD indicate VR3
/36.,0 water systems and turnouts with the DSRSD compliance with this mitigation measure.
system.
155 03.05 PW Require that design and construction of all TMAP FMAP X Write condition regarding approval by VR4
/37.0 water system facility improvements be in SDR BLDP DSRSD regarding water system.
accordance with DSRSD standards.
23
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
4
H � � : E;A�TZONpR:.:: E 5UR� .. _ :...........:........:.... ...: .:....: SFART_ . :
.::::.:....
156 03.05 9H PW Water. Require a "will serve" letter from TMAP FMAP X Conditions regarding provision of will VA5
/38.0 DSRSD prior to permit approval for grading. SDR GRAD serve letters for fresh water.
157 03.05 PW Reduce the growth inducing potential of water PREZ TMAP X X DSRSD has already prepared the Eastern VS1
/39.0 system expansion, the water distribution system ANNE SDR Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
will be sized to accommodate only the estimated REZO dated December, 1993, (Dodson and
water demands from approved land uses within Associates) to provide the updated
the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General computer simulations and master plan
Plan Amendment. analyses for wastewater collection and
potable and recycled water systems.
The report provides for pipeline sizing
only to accomodate development within
the Specific Plan area and areas located
between the Specific Plan's west
boundary and existing development within
the City. No oversizing for areas east
or north of the Specific Plan have been
included. Alameda County funded the
Dodson Study in part. Applicant shall
install required facilities as a
condition of approval. (Per Letter to
The City of Dublin from DSRSD dated
November 3, 1994)
158 03.05 PW Ensure that the water distribution system is CONT CONT X All utility systems designed and built VT1
/40.0 planned, designed and constructed for energy to be owned by DSRSD are and will
efficient operation. continue to be designed and built for
energy efficient operation in
conformance with sound engineering
principles as required by the District
Code (letter to The City of Dublin from
DSRSD dated November 3, 1994) .
159 03.05 PW Require all reservoir construction to meet all TMAP FMAP X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of VU1
/41.0 the applicable standards of DSRSD, to meet SDR BLDP Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that in
current seismic building standards, and to accordance with the Policy on Major
provide adequate site drainage. Infrastructure adopted by the District,
all facilites are designed and built by
the District and thus will adhere to all
District standards.
24
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
C >:.. L :. '::W A ; S>:'; H ::.h ON:.:C! ':: ?;
:.:,: T <: . T H �' Z _.T E CTI E SU ..';:.__....... :. ..::.... TA E D P:>. ' i:. O E.Z ` . M� A:_::.:: __... _. .._ ... .. .. , _... R.H A R� .. ..S R'x'. : N . ... .N .._... C A . . ... °.:h.C.x� N..,�XcK N. >COM3' zSSU�;' ......< ..
.............
160 03.05 PW Require the proposed new water pump stations to TMAP FMAP X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of VW1
/42.0 meet all the applicable standards of DSRSD and SDR BLDP Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that no
include emergency power generators at each pump new potable water pump stations are
station. required or anticipated for this
project. In accordance with the
District's Policy on Major
Infrastructure all pump stations are
designed and built by the District and l
thus will adhrer to all Distric
standards which address factors such as
• _ emergency power and noise attenuation.
161 03.05 PW Include design provisions to pump stations to TMAP FMAP X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of VW2
/43.0 reduce sound levels from operating pump motors SDR BLDP Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that no
and emergency generators. new potable water pump stations are
required or anticipated for this
project. In accordance with the
District's Policy on Major
Infrastructure all pump stations are
designed and built by the District and
thus will adhrer to all Distric
standards which address factors such as
emergency power and noise attenuation.
162 03.05 PW Provide drainage facilities that will minimize TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding compliance as part VX1
/44.0 any increased potential for erosion or SDR BLDP of grading plan.
flooding.
163 03.05 PW Require channel improvements consisting of TMAP FMAP X Condition in the event of alteration to VX2
/45.0 natural creek bottoms and side slopes with SDR BLDP the Creek.
natural vegetation where possible.
164 03.05 9T PW Require the preparation of a Master Drainage TMAP FMAP X County is preparing. VX3
/46.0 Plan for each development. SDR BLDP __
165 03.05 9U PW Require Project area development to provide TMAP FMAP X Part of Master Drainage Plan. VX4
/47.0 facilities to alleviate potential downstream SDR BLDP
flooding due to Project area development. __
166 03.05 PW Require the construction of the backbone TMAP FMAP X Need condition. VX5
/48.0 drainage facilities to be consistent with the SDR BLDP
Storm Drainage Master Plan.
167 03.05 PW Plan facilities and management practices that TMAP FMAP X Zone 7, DSRSD & City Public Works will VV1
/49.0 protect and enhance water quality. SDR IILDP monitor this requirement through project
review.
25
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
:M T'.:: : :WH I sI:T EA :
:x:�. . lx G 1• A�' S TION..b
. A ... .. _ H_ . C .. .R �t-EASiT :: .::.. . .. ,. :. ,: AR ND _
RE...... .... T E <TI A:; ...P . .� .:::-.::a_ :: .AC,��Ot`I :�hKEN ...:. ;'CO . . ;: SU ..
O >W A.:
168 03.05 PW Protect groundwater resources with Zone 7 ' s TMAP FMAP X Write letter to Zone 7 VV2
/50.0 support for an ongoing groundwater recharge SDR BLDP
program for the Central Basin.
169 03.05 PW Water Quality Investigation. Require a TMAP FMAP X X Require applicant to prepare
/51.0 specific water quality investigation be SDR BLDP investigation and submit as soon as
submitted with each development application to possible. Conditons may be required
demonstrate existing water quality and impacts depending on results of the
that urban runoff would have. The water investigation.
quality investigation should address the )
quantity of! runoff- and the Sffectd foim
discharged Pollutants from nurface runoff l.nto
_ • Creeks and detention facilities.
170 03.05 PW beVelop community based programs to educate TMAP CONT X Staff already conducts these programs. VZ1
/52.0 Local residents and businesses on methods to SDR
reduce nonpoint sources of pollution, and
coordinate such programs with current Alameda
County programs.
171 03.05 PW Require all development to meet the requirement TMAP BLDP X Need condition. VZ2
/53.0 of the City of Dublin' s "Best Management SDR
Practices" to mitigate storm water pollution.
172 03.05 PW Require all development to meet the water TMAP BLDP X Need condition. VZ3
/54.0 quality requirements of the City of Dublin' s SDR
NPDES permit.
173 03.05 PW Require all development to meet the water TMAP BLDP X Need condition. VZ4
/55.0 quality requirements of the Alameda County SDR
Urban Runoff Clean Water Program.
174 03.06 • BL Require the use of modern seismic design in TMAP FMAP X Write standard condition VIE1
/01.0 construction of development projects, and build SDR BLDP
in accordance with Uniform Building code and )
applicable county and city code requirements. r
175 03.06 BL Provide setbacks from or modification of TMAP FMAP X Need condition regarding results of VIE2
/02.0 unstable and potentially unstable landforms, SDR BLDP geotechnical report may require revision
and use of appropriate design to ensure seismic to site plan.
safety.
176 03.06 PW Require appropriate grading and design to TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VIE3
/03.0 completely remove unstable and potentially SDR BLDP
unstable materials in hillside areas where
development may require substantial grading.
26
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL. PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
i:' I 0 '.i:
Z�,.. T AC _. SS �� T ;, ..
S R .. D. ;PG::.Pt P,: C x > KF ...,...,..
Maga N A
.............. ..... ............ ....... ..... ............ . ........ ......
::..:. . ....: .,.:..:.:::. ..
177 03.06 PW Engineered retention structures and surface and TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development.
/04.0 subsurface drainage improvements should be used SDR BLDP •
as appropriate to improve the stability of
sidehill fills and potentially unstable
materials, particularly colluvium, not entirely
removed by grading.
178 03.06 PW Reduce seismically-induced fill settlement by TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VIE4
/05.0 requiring properly designed fills with keyways SDR BLDP l
and subsurface drainage, and which are /
adequately compacted (i.e. minimum 90% relative
compaction) .
179 03.06 PW Design roads, structural foundations, and TMAP FMAP X Write condition regarding geotechnical VIE5
/06.0 underground utilities to accommodate estimated SDR BLDP report and stock pond removal.
settlement without failure, especially across
transitions between fills and cuts, and to
remove or reconstruct potentially unstable
stock pond embankments in development areas.
180 03.06 PW Require all development projects in the Project TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding geotechnical report VIE6
/07.0 area to perform design level geotechnical SDR BLDP which is requirement of tentative map
investigations prior to issuing any permits. submittal.
181 03.06 CM Provide for the development of earthquake 1995 FMAP X Responsibility of the City to prepare VIE7
/08.0 preparedness plans and the dissemination of BLDP and distribute per DEIR. Need to
appropriate emergency measures to all Project prepare.
residents and employees. •
182 03.06 PW Reduce alteration to existing landforms through TMAP FMAP X Relates to hillside developments. VIA1
/09.0 the preparation of grading plans that adapt SDR BLDP
improvements to natural landforms and
implementation of such techniques as partial
)
pads and retaining structures.
183 03.06 PW Reduce landform alteration by carefully siting TMAP FMAP X Relates to hillside developments. iVIA2
/10.0 individual improvements to avoid adverse SDR BLDP
conditions and thus the need for remedial
grading.
184 03.06 PW Prepare detailed design level geotechnical TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding geotechnical report VIB1
/11.0 investigations on development sites within the SDR BLDP which is requirement of tentative map
Project area, to locate and characterize submittal.
groundwater conditions and formulate design
criteria and measures to mitigate adverse
conditions.
27
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
M WHA
..........
185 03.06 PW Construct subdrain systems, drainage pipe and TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding findings of VIB2
/12.0 permeable materials to reduce groundwater SDR BLDP geotechnical report, however, subdrains
impacts. are normally used in hillside
developments.
186 03.06 PW Remove stock pond embankment and drain TMAP FMAP X There are no stock ponds on this site. VIB3
/13.0 reservoirs in development areas to reduce SDR BLDP
groundwater impacts.
187 03.06 PW Prepare design level geotechnical TMAP FMAP X Submittal of a geotechnical report VIB4 r
/14.0 investigations for development projects in the SDR BLDP required at Tentative Map application or
Project area to characterize site specific prior to grading and building permit
soils and bedrock conditions, and to formulate approval.
appropriate design criteria.
188 03.06 PW Implement measures to control moisture in the TMAP BLDP X Condition may be required at Tentative VIBS
/15.0 ground to reduce the potential for impact SDR Map after submittal of geotechnical
resulting from expansive soils and rock. report.
189 03.06 BL Reduce the potential effects of expansive soil TMAP FMAP X Condition required at grading and VIB6
/16.0 and rock through appropriate foundation and SDR BLDP building permit approval.
pavement design.
190 03.06 PW Prepare design level geotechnical TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VIC1
/17.0 investigations for development within the SDR BLDP
Project area to characterize site specific
slope stability conditions and to formulate
appropriate design criteria.
191 03.06 PW Avoid impacts from unstable slopes by siting TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VIC2
/18.0 development away from unstable landforms and SDR BLDP
from slopes greater than 30%, and providing
lower density development in steep, unstable
areas.
192 03.06 PW Implement measures such as removing, TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VIC3
/19.0 reconstructing, or repairing unstable areas, or SDR BLDP
structural engineering, when unstable areas
cannot be avoided.
193 03.06 PW Require grading plans for hillside areas, which TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VID1
/20.0 plans minimize grading and required cuts and SDR BLDP
fills by adapting roads to natural landforms
and stepping structures down steeper slopes.
28
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
T2 ,> E
�.... ..W �. ..�5 . � SAC .... ;. :>E < : <>:
194 03.06 PW Require grading plan and mitigation measure TRAP FMAP X Write standard condition. VID2 •
/21.0 compliance with the minimum requirements of the SDR BLDP
Uniform Building Code and applicable County and
City code requirements. ,
195 03.06 BL Require that unretained cut slopes should not TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VID3
/22.0 exceed 3:1 unless detailed, site specific SDR BLDP
geotechnical investigations indicate that
steeper inclinations are appropriate and safe.
196 03.06 PW Require that slopes steeper that 5:1 should be TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VID4
/23.0 keyed and benched into competent material and SDR BLDP
provided with subdrainage, prior to placement
of engineered fill.
197 03.06 PW Require that unreinforced fill elopes should be TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VID5
/24.0 no steeper than 2:1 and provided with benches SDR BLDP •
and subsurface drainage, as appropriate.
198 03.06 PW Require that fill be engineered (compacted) to TMAP FMAP X Requirement of grading permit and soils VIDE
/25.0 at least 90 percent relative compaction. SDR BLDP _ report.
199 03.06 PW Require that development projects prepare plans TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development. VID7
/26.0 for the periodic inspection and maintenance of SDR BLDP
subsurface drainage features, and the removal
and disposal of materials deposited in surface
drains and catch basins.
200 03.06 PW Require that grading activities be timed to FMAP BLDP X This is a requirement of the City's VID8
/27.0 avoid the rainy season as much as possible, and SDR Grading Ordinance. However, also write
that interim control measures be implemented to condition.
control runoff and reduce erosion potential. •
201 03.06 PW Reduce longterm erosion and sedimentation TMAP FMAP X Refers to hillside development and/or VID9
/28.0 impacts through appropriate design, SDR BLDP large undeveloped areas.
construction, and continued maintenance of
surface and subsurface drainage.
202 03.07 PL Ensure that direct disturbance or removal of 'TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding flood control IIIC1
/01.0 trees or native vegetation cover be minimized SDR BLDP improvements to the Creek and
and restricted to those areas actually revegetation.
designated for the construction of
improvements.
29
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
IT.::.::. MI . ACT. , WHAT ;IS. THE' ACTION OR MEASURE E SU
RE > . sSTARW END N <P 4. A s ACTION >TAKE
N. < COMP .;; >.>.I UE.':
b S ; ::hR G E. ;:;:
N .... ..M1;A q _ „
_o r
ij
203 03.07 PL Provide for the preparation of vegetation TMAP FMAP X X Need to prepare plan in coordination IIIC2
/02.0 enhancement/ management plans for all open SDR BLDP with BKF/ALACO study. May require
space areas (whether held publicly or condition for a project to ensure
privately) with the intent to enhance the conformity with study.
biologic potential of the area as wildlife
habitat.
204 03.07 60 PL Require a detailed revegetation/ restoration SUR BLDP X Require fencing on eastern boundary of IIIC3
/03.0 plan be developed for all disturbed areas that FMAP site during construction and grading.
are to remain undeveloped. If area is disturbed also need condition
_ regarding revegetation.
205 03.07 PL Require the City of Dublin to develop and ANNE REZO X The subject site is within the City IIIC4
/04.0 implement grazing management plans to protect TMAP limits and is in a zoning district which
riparian and wetland areas, increase plant does not permit grazing activities.
. diversity, and encourage the recovery of native
plants.
206 03.07 PL Ensure that all areas of disturbance be SDR BLDP X Require fencing on eastern boundary of IIIC5
/05.0 revegetated as quickly as possible to prevent FMAP site during construction and grading.
erosion. If area is disturbed also need condition
regarding revegetation.
207 03.07 PL Require the preservation of natural stream PREZ FMAP X Any modification to Tassajara Creek for IIIC6
/06.0 corridors, ponds, springs, seeps, and wetland ANNE BLDP flood control purposes will be completed
areas wherever possible. REZO in a manner sensitive to its native
state.
208 03.07 PL Require the incorporation of riparian and SDR BLDP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this IIIC7
/07.0 wetland areas into project open space areas, FMAP project. Need to check regarding ,
and ensure that loss of riparian or wetland drainage area adjacent the highway. Any
habitat be mitigated per Dept. of Fish & Game/ alteration or modification to Tassajara
Corps of Engineers. Creek will be approved through
appropriate federal and state agencies.
209 03.07 PL Require all stream corridors be revegetated SDR BLDP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this IIIC.
/08.0 with native plant species to enhance their FMAP project. Should the Creek be modified
natural appearance and improve habitat values. or changed in any way, a revegetation
plan would be required, etc.
210 03.07 PW Ensure storm runoff is carried in natural TMAP FMAP X The project site does not drain to IIIC9
/09.0 stream channels whenever possible, rather than SDR BLDP Tassajara Creek. However, as a
replacing with underground drainage systems preventative measure a condition will be
(Mit. Measure 3.7/9.0) . ARII P. 584 - see for required that any modification to the
additional language re maintenance. Creek as a result of this project will
kick in these mitigation measures - need
conditions.
30
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
Wl A is TH. .. Z'S AC _. h... .. . ..... N. EA5URE:_R..�i ::.: . .: ;:: ART >END ;N
_...... . __ .. _. . .. _.... _ __,.. __.._.... _... ... - ::: ::.,: .-:.. :$x.. . _. p.. .C , _11. ;. . .., . ;:_ -_�ON; TAKEN .;>
211 03.07 PL Establish a stream corridor system that TMAP FMAP X The Specific Plan and Parks Master Plan IIIC10
/10.0 provides multipurpose open space corridors SDR BLDP establishes a trail system. One of the
capable of accommodating wildlife and trails will be along Tassajara Creek.
pedestrian circulation. The project is setback at least 150'
from the Creek.
212 03.07 6E PL Require all project applicants submit TMAP FMAP X Should any alterations be required to IIIC11
/11.0 multiparameter wetlands delineation to the COE SDR BLDP Tassajara Creek, the appropriate
for verification and jurisdictional agencies will be contacted for
establishment, and submit plans for proposed compliance with permitting requirements.
alteration to any watercourse to the DFG for The negative dec. will be circulated
their review and approval. through OPR.
213 03.07 6F PL Provide for the development of a comprehensive PREZ TMAP X X Although Tassajara Creek is not a part IIIC12
/12.0 stream corridor restoration program that ANNE SDR of this project, any modifications for
identifies a detailed set of criteria for REZO flood control will require this type of
grading, stabilization, and revegetation of restoration program. Begin preparation
planning area stream channels. ___ of a program.
214 03.07 6G PL Provide for the dedication of land and TMAP FMAP X The City will require as part of the IIIC13
/13.0 improvements (i.e. , trails, revegetation, etc. ) SDR BLDP development agreement that when the
along both sides of stream corridors as a parcel to the east develops, the County
condition of project approval. will establish a trail system and
dedicate it to the City or agency
_ designated by the City.
215 03.07 6H PW Provide for the enactment of an erosion and PREZ TMAP X Need condition regarding this mitigation IIIC14
/14.0 sedimentation control ordinance establishing ANNE SDR measure. City has ordinance covering
performance standards to ensure maintenance of REZO this issue.
water quality and protection of stream
channels.
216 03.07 6K PL Establish and maintain a liaison between the 1994 CONT X This area is not a biologically IIIC15
/15.0 City of Dublin and resource management agencies sensitive area per the Draft EIR Figure
(i.e. California Dept. of Fish & Game, U.S. 6.2. It is shown on the map (including
Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Corp of the creek area) as "developed" .
Engineers) for the purpose of monitoring However, the Negative Declaration will
compliance with Specific Plan policies. be circulated through the Office of
• Planning and Research, so the city will
_ be maintaining these liaisons.
217 03.07 PL Require sensitive habitat areas be avoided and TMAP FMAP X_ No sensitive habitats have been IIIC16
/16.0 protected wherever feasible. SDR BLDP identified on the project site. Require
fencing along eastern project boundary
during construction to protect Creek.
31
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
?:M IS ..THE. AC N,
_R..ME11 .. kZ�.::. ...:....,..... . 9 R .. END-. , ..: .:N.: : : . .. ..:
*Oa A.,iSW
.. . .... . .. .. ... . s.. .
218 03.07 PW Require construction near drainages take place TMAP FMAP X Modification or construction within 100' IIIC17
/17.0 during the dry season. SDR BLDP of stream bank needs to be in dry
season.
219 03.07 PL Require all development in the Project area TMAP FMAP X The project env. is not associated with IIIC18
/18.0 comply with the Eastern Dublin San Joaquin Kit SDR BLDP Kit Fox dens. No kit foxes were i
Fox Protection Plan. observed on the site during the Specific
Plan biological .survey. Need condition
that should preconstruction survey )
identify foxes, S.J. Kit Fox Protection
Plan will be followed.
220 03.07 PL Provide for the cooperation between the City of 1994 CONT X The project site is flat and is not IIIC19
/18. 1 Dublin and other appropriate agencies in the shown in the DEIR to be in an area where
preparation of a Kit Fox Habitat Management Kit Foxes would locate. Reference page
Plan. 285 and Fig. 6.2 of the Specific Plan -
should preconstruction survey identify
Kit Fox - a plan would need to be
prepared. Should a preconstruction
survey identify the presence of the Kit
Fox a KFHMP would have to be prepared.
221 03.07 6N PW Restrict the use of rodenticides and herbicides TMAP CONT X Require developer to contact County Ag IIIC20
/19.0 within the Project area in order to reduce SDR and prepare and distribute handout to
potential impacts to wildlife. tenants: Also require shopping center
management to comply.
222 03.07 PL Tri-colored Blackbird. Require developers TMAP FMAP X Need condition.
/20.0 conduct a preconstruction survey within 60 days SDR BLDP
prior to habitat modification to verify the
presence of sensitive species.
223 03.07 PL Ensure the protection and enhancement of TMAP FMAP X Need condition re preconstruction survey IIIC22 )
/21.0 sensitive species habitat areas. SDR BLDP and protection if sensitive species
identified. •
224 03.07 PL Require the maintenance of a buffer around FMAP FI/O — X Condition re: if preconstruction survey IIIC23
/22.0 breeding sites of the redlegged frog, BLDP turns up certain species require a
California tiger salamander, and the Western buffer, etc.
pond turtle before commencing construction.
225 03.07 PL Ensure that a natural open space zone (Golden TMAP FMAP X Project is not within or near this area. IIIC24
/23.0 Eagle Protection Zone) is maintained around the SDR BLDP
golden eagle nest located in the northeast
corner of the planning area.
32
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
' MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
T, Mix W RCT:, : l. :WHAT>J5 TH _ ACTIONiOR_MBASuR�.. ,,...:_.:.:... . ... _ ......__ :., : >START 'END, N.. p O. � _ ; ;:ATZOB �A � ' , >:
15 S. pFtRG r<
226 03.07 PL Require an additional temporal buffer be BLDP PI/0 X Site is nowhere near Golden Eagle IIIC25
/24.0 established within 250 feet of the Golden Eagle Protection Zone.
Protection Zone during the golden eagle
reproductive period, prior to construction.227 03.07 PL Require that the Project maintain substantial TMAP FMAP X_ Provided in Specific Plan. IIIC26
/25.0 rural residential/agricultural acreage to SDR BLDP
provide suitable forage for the golden eagles. _
' 228 03.07 6M PW Require the placement of all transmission lines TMAP FMAP X Need condition. IIIC27
/26.0 underground whenever feasible, to avoid the SDR BLDP
potential for raptor electrocutions.
229 03.07 PW Require a minimum buffer (at least 300 feet) be BLDP FI/O X Standard condition regarding IIIC28
/27.0 maintained around nesting sites of the preconstruction survey. No badgers
burrowing owl and breeding sites (either known identified on site during biological
or those identified in preconstruction surveys) survey of DEIR.
of the American badger during the breeding
season to avoid direct loss of individuals. _
230 03.07 6L PL Special Status Invertevrates, Require TMAP FMAP X Need condition. IIIC21
/28.0 developers conduct a preconstruction survey SDR BLDP
within 60 days prior to habitat modification to
verify the presence of sensitive species. _
231 03.08 PL Establish a visually distinctive community PREZ FMAP X The project has been designed with this IIID1
/01.0 which preserves the character of the natural ANNE BLDP mitigation measure in mind. It is
landscape by protecting key visual elements and REZO sensitive to the creek and does not
maintaining views from major travel corridors block views of vistas from I-580. '
and public spaces.
` 232 03.08 PL Ensure implementation of the Specific Plan/ PREZ FMAP X This project has been designed with this IIID2
/02.0 General Plan land use plan, which was developed ANNE BLDP mitigation measure in mind. It is
to retain predominant natural features and a REZO sensitive to the Creek and does not
sense of openness. block vistas from I-580.
233 03.08 6S PL Establish technique(s) for implementing the PREZ FMAP X This project has been designed with this IIID3
/03.0 long term preservation of visually significant ANNE BLDP mitigation measure in mind. It is
portions of hillsides and other important REZO sensitive to the Creek and does not
visual resources. block vistas from I-580.
234 03.08 PL Reduce the visual impact of extensive grading PREZ FMAP X This relates to hillside development. IIID4
/04.0 through sensitive engineering design that uses ANNE BLDP
gradual transitions from graded areas to REZO
natural slopes and revegetation.
33
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
C W A S5::TF E:
; : O .2.1IT: A T H T 3 ..AC .ION ;O EA : :.
�' I:N:. :.:. : ,__. .: _..._R..M SURir.. ... ;. A N .0 . AC. :ZO 'i's. A
�,ESII
MOMMONOV
rr
235 03.08 PL Minimize alterations to existing natural PREZ FMAP X This relates to hillside development. IIIDS
/04. 1 contours. ANNE BLDP
. REZO
236 03.08 PL Avoid extensive areas of flat development. PREZ FMAP X The project site is flat. Varying pad IIID6
/04.2 ANNE BLDP heights would change the natural
REZO contours of the land.
237 03.08 PL Encourage building design to conform to natural PREZ SDR X This relates to hillside development. IIID7
/04.3 land forms as much as possible. ANNE )
REZO
238 03.08 PL Require graded slopes be recontoured to PREZ FMAP X This relates to hillside development. IIIDS
/04.4 resemble existing land forms in the immediate ANNE BLDP
area. REZO
239 03.08 PW Minimize the height of cut and fill slopes as PREZ FMAP X This relates to hillside development IIID9
/04.5 much as possible. ANNE BLDP
REZO
240 03.08 PL Minimize visual impacts by prohibiting PREZ FMAP X This relates to hillside development. IIID10
/05.0 development on the main ridgeline, and ensuring ANNE BLDP
that development on foreground hills meets REZO
certain standards.
241 03.08 PL Locate structures so they do not obstruct PREZ FMAP X The location and design of structures IIID11
/05.1 scenic views or appear to extend above an ANNE BLDP will not block scenic views from I-580.
identified scenic backdrop when viewed from a REZO
designated scenic route.
242 03.08 PL Restrict structures on the hillsides that PREZ FMAP X This relates to hillside development. IIID12
/05.2 appear to project above major ridgelines. ANNE BLDP
REZO
243 03.08 PL Avoid unnecessary alteration or disturbance and PREZ FMAP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this IIID1'
/06.0 maintain access to the stream corridors from ANNE BLDP project. Structures will be set back
)
adjoining development to protect the visual REZO 150 from the top of bank. Any •
character of the stream corridors. alterations to the creek for flood
control purposes will be minimal and
done with consultation with permitting
agencies. Access and views of the creek
• will be maintained.
244 03.08 PL Preserve views of designated open space areas. PREZ FMAP X The location and design of structures IIID14
/07.0 ANNE BLDP will not block views from I-580.
REZO
34
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
• EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
M
X.T.:. __ g :..... A T A SS :::. HE .
R .:. .. AF2T : :�Nn ; ;. .
tgA5. PRO :.. :.: ... _,,...:,.:.... : . . ..:..:., .
o; N
245 03.08 PL Provide for the preparation of a visual survey PREZ TMAP X X Require preparation of a visual survey IIID15
/07.1 of the Project area to identify and map ANNE SDR as part of project Site Development
viewsheds of scenic vistas. REZO Review submittal.
246 03.08 6Q PL Provide for the designation of scenic PREZ ANNE X X Staff is currently working on a scenic IIID16
/08.0 corridors, and the adoption of scenic corridor ANNE corridor policy for the Specific Plan
policies and review procedures for projects Area. The location and design of
within a scenic corridor viewshed. structures will not significantly block
or impact views from I-580 to major t
a. Adopt Tassajara Road, I-580, and Fallon scenic views. A visual survey will be
Road as designated scenic corridors. required as part of site development
__________ review application.
247 03.08 6R PL Require projects with potential impacts on PREZ SDR X The project has been designed to not IIID17
/08.1 scenic corridors submit a detailed visual ANNE FMAP block scenic vistas of either the Creek
analysis with development project applications. REZO or hillside areas.
248 03.09 PL Require mechanical' and/ or hand subsurface TMAP FMAP X Although no prehistoric resources were IIIE1
/01.0 testing on all locations of prehistoric SDR BLDP identified as a result of the DEIR, the
resources to determine the presence or absence standard condition re discovery will be
of midden deposits. included.
249 03.09 PL Require all locations containing either midden TMAP FMAP X Although no prehistoric resources were IIIE2
/02.0 components or concentrations of cultural SDR BLDP identified as a result of the DEIR, the
materials located on the surface be recorded on standard condition re discovery will be
State of California site survey forms. __ included.
250 03.09 PL Require evaluative testing if proposed TMAP FMAP X Although no prehistoric resources were IIIE3
/03.0 development would directly or indirectly impact SDR BLDP identified as a result of the DEIR,'- the
recorded and mapped locations of resources, standard condition re discovery will be
included.
251 03.09 PL Require a qualified archaeologist develop a TMAP FMAP X Although no prehistoric resources were IIIE4
/04.0 protection program for "significant" resources SDR BLDP identified as a result of the DEIR, the
whose condition will be altered by the proposed standard condition re discovery will be
development. _ included.
252 03.09 PW Require grading and construction cease in the BLDP FI/0 X Write standard condition. IIIE5
/05.0 event that historic or prehistoric remains are
discovered during such activities.
35
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
L :: A .... i<:»:::
... ..M ...... C . :. . H I5.. HE.:AQT ON;>:� .:: A5U ;: S RR .;,Nll. .; is ' ':::.. : `. A O
CTZ N .TAKEN :. ;. Cfy �_ .5P„g........s;..>:;.;�:.:.
IT>. T.�. .:: A �::.:. :.:W .. �.:: '�::, L.: .: .R M� �.� . ..:... .::. ... .. T T: :.�-_ N: �' IC: W. ... M .... _.x.S
Nb. t�Alog AS. .. .PRAG.. � . ::.....
. .....:.:...::
.... ... .....
253 03.09 6P PL Require as part of the development application TMAP FMAP X Site not identified as having any IIIE12
/06.0 process that steps be taken to ensure that SDR BLDP prehistoric remains or historic
cultural resources are not impacted. structures. However, standard condition
regarding discovery of prehistoric
a. Determine whether the subject site is remains will be required.
identified as having prehistoric or
historic resources potentially located on it
based on the first stage cultural resource
survey of the area.
b. Determine the level of archaeological or
historical significance in the second level of
detailed research and field reconnaissance for
sites with potential resources.
c. Develop a mitigation plan consistent with
policies in the Specific Plan and current CEQA
Guidelines concerning cultural resources for
sites containing significant resources.
254 03.09 PL Require all properties with historic resources TMAP FMAP X. Site not identified as having any IIIE6
/07.0 which may be impacted by development be subject SDR BLDP historic structures.
to indepth archival research.
255 03.09 PL Encourage the adaptive reuse or restoration of TMAP FMAP X Site not identified as having any IIIE7
/08.0 historic structures whenever feasible. SDR BLDP historic structures.
256 03.09 PL Require an architectural historian to assess TMAP FMAP X Site not identified as having any IIIE9
/09.0 the significance of all standing structures and SDR BLDP historic structures. „
other indicators of historic occupation and/ or
use of the area.
257 03.09 PL Require archival research and oral interviews TMAP FMAP X Site not identified as having any IIIE10
/10.0 to determine the local or regional significance SDR BLDP historic structures.
of structures or locations (identified in the
1988 report) by their association with
important persons or events.
258 03.09 PL Require that all previously noted locations (in TMAP FMAP X Site not identified as having any IIIE8
/11.0 1988 report) be recorded on official State of SDR BLDP historic structures.
California Historical Site Inventory forms.
259 03.09 PL Require the preservation of a preservation TMAP FMAP X Site not identified as having any IIIEll
/12.0 program for historic sites which qualify under SDR BLDP historic structures.
CEQA Guidelines as historically significant.
36
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
Z� kS T ..fix..... . A .::WHA :>:I T_ C +. .. �•.._ . _ x. S ._ HE: ACT: N.C] S :.
_. � U
RE. >.. :•. ::� ;: ;;: RT;: :END :_;. ;.
•
b ; :;:
_. . :: _ . ..: ...: �' _ _: N _F' �._ A T N ICEN ..... .:<.. .: ::.: cpMp. .. ::Yssu� . ....
21 ME ;
N0.
R
260 03.10 PL Require acoustical studies for all residential TMAP FMAP X Not a residential project. IF1
/01.0 development projects within the future CNEL 60 SDR BLDP
contour to show how interior noise levels will
be reduced to 45 dB.
' 261 03.10 PL Require that all development projects in the TMAP FMAP X Not a residential project. IF2
/02.0 Project area provide noise barriers or berms SDR BLDP
• near existing residences to control noise in
outdoor use spaces.
262 03.10 PW Require acoustical studies prior to future TMAP FMAP X No significant noise impacts on existing IF3
. /03.0 residential development in the' Foothill SDR BLDP residences.
Residential, Tassajara Village Center, County
• Center, and Hacienda Gateway subareas to
determine whether future noise impacts from
Camp Parks and the county jail will be within
acceptable limits.
263 03.10 PL Require development projects in the Project TMAP FMAP X No residential development in the IF4
/04.0 area to submit a Construction Noise Management SDR BLDP vicinity of this project.
Program that identifies measures proposed to
minimize construction noise impacts on existing
residents.
264 03.10 PL Require applicants to minimize construction BLDP FI/O X A condition will be required IF5
/05.0 noise impacts. implementing this.
a. Request that all construction operations
comply with local noise standards and be
limited to normal daytime hours, and stationary
equipment be adequately muffled and located
away from sensitive receptors.
265 03.10 PL Require the preparation of noise management TMAP FMAP X No residential development is included IF6
/06.0 plans for all mixed use projects in which SDR BLDP in this project.
residential units would be combined with
commercial, office, or other urban
nonresidential uses.
266 03.10 PL Provide for the establishment of a noise PREZ TMAP X X The ordinance must be prepared and a IF7
/07.0 mitigation monitoring fee to pay for on and ANNE SDR condition applied which ensures that
offsite noise mitigations, including but not REZO developers participate.
limited to, noise barriers, earthen berms, or
retrofitting structures with soundrated
windows. This mitigation measure appears in
the cumulative impacts section of the DEIR.
37
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
T Mix' ACT WHAT IS::THE ACT ON OR MEASURE: STAR
T. > :!END ':? :
C >.
... :.tom _. . ... >.::. _. , :;::; _ .. __._ _N'.. P. ?>
AS.... . .FROG.:, _ . .__.. .. . ... ACTION.
R O .;
S
267 03.11 PW Require development projects to implement dust FMAP FI 0 X
/01.0 control measures to reduce project dust GRAD / Trds is required by the City's Grading VIIA1
deposition to acceptable levels. Ordinance
268 03.11 PW Minimize construction interference with FMAP _
FMAP FI/O X Write condition regarding approval of VIIA2
/02.0regional non-project traffic movement. GRAD construction traffic route.
BLDP
269 03.11 PL Require emissions control from onsite equipment FMAP FI O X/ Need condition regarding construction VIIA3
/03.0through a routine mandatory program of low GRAD equipment at the site.
emissions tuneups. BLDP 1
270 03.11 PL Require preparation of a construction impact SDR FI/0 X Require as condition of tentative map. VIIA4 1
/04.0 reduction plan that incorporates all proposed
air;quality mitigation strategies.
271 03. 11 PW Encourage cooperation to integrate air quality 1994 CONT X The City participates in all regional VIIB1
/05.0 planning efforts on a regional basis.
and subregional efforts that have
272 03. 11 PL Maintaininfluence on air quality.
consistency among specific development TMAP FMAP X Consistency findings need to be made on VIIB2
/06.0 plans and regional transportation and growth SDR BLDP
management plans. project. Conditions may be necessary.
273 03.11 PW Implement transportation demand management TMAP FMAP X Require developer to submit employment VIIB3
/07.0 techniques to reduce mobile source emissions. SDR BLDP
information. Also require compliance
274 03.11 PW Optimize the existing transportation system to CONT CONT with Trip Reduction Ordinance.
/08.0X The City adopted a Trip Reduction VIIB4
reduce congestion and shift travel to nonpeak Ordinance which will implement this
travel periods. mitigation measure. BAAQMD adminsters
275 03.11 PW Coordinate levels of growth with roadwaythe Ordinance.
TMAP FMAP X The traffic study will address these VIIB5
/09.0transportation facilities improvements to SDR BLDP issues. A Traffic Impact Fee will be
accommodate travel demand without inducing developed to fund construction of
demand by providing excess system capacity. transportation improvements as they are
needed. A condition that applicant pay
traffic fee will be required.
276 03. 11 PL Encourage mixed use development that provides PREZ TMAP X Although the project is solely VIIB6
/10.0 housing, jobs, goods and services in close ANNE SDR commercial, the Santa Rita area, of
proximity. REZO which this project is a part has both
residential and commercial and provides
a good balance of jobs and housing.
38
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
'P:'-. 4�1' F1C'T �: WHAT IS: !1i-IE ACTION OR MEAsvR�
ST?�RT END
...,..... .. ... . ; <: ION: �11KE?7; ..
NO. ..... .. CQMp xSSU .:
277 03.11 PL Require linkage between growth of housing and PREZ CONT _ }{
/11.0 job opportunities consistent with a positive ANNE This commercial project, when combined VIIB7
subregional contribution to jobs/ housing ratio REZO with other projects, commercialifa and
balances. residential in the specific plan,
provides a positive linkage between
278 03.11 PL Minimize stationary source emissions associated PREZ TMAP X housing and job ratio balances.
/12.0 with Project development wherever feasible. ANNE SDR Development standards for the project VIIC1
have been designed to satisfy this
279 03.11 PL Incorporate solid waste recycling in all PEES CONT condition.
/13.0 development planning. X Write condition. VIIC2
ANNE
REZO
280 03.12 11.3 PL Prepare development agreements with detailed PREZ TMAP
/01.0 .1 financing plans prior to specific levels of REZO SDR X A development wileeaddt is being 3
development approval to identify necessary prepared that will address issues
capital improvements, including public specific to this project.
facilities, streets and utilities, and assure
their timely financing.
281 03.12 CM Adopt an Area of Benefit Ordinance and form an PREZ TMAP X
/02.0 Area of Benefit for those properties benefiting ANNE SDR The City adopted an Area of Benefit VIIIA2
from construction of public improvements Ordinance.
described in the Specific Plan. •
REZO
282 03.12 CM Create one or more Mello Roos CFD or Special PREZ TMAP
/03.0 Assessment Districts to finance construction of ANNE SDR X The astructur wsul be putting in o VIIIA3
the infrastructure to serve the Area of REZO infarearfbee ftrmaydnee the beoj e or .
Benefit. An area of benefit may need to be formed
283 03.12 CM Have bond counsel evaluate the benefit to the PREZ TMAP Xfor some of the improvements.
/04.0 City, in terms of savings of money and ANNE SDR
This tancecf is not requesting VIIIA4
avoidance of undue risk, of pooling bonds under REZO bondsfinae inom the City in the area of
bond f
the Marks Roos Bond Poolin. Act inancing.
284 03.12 CM Analyze the citywide infrastructure needs to PREZ TMAP )
/05.0 assess the usefulness of implementing an impact ANNE SDR X thehe6E0 terniDs are being prepared Plan. for VIIIA5
fee program, in compliance with AB 1600, that REZO Eastern Dublin Specific mAny
participation in identified
could draw some funding from new development improvements
when Final Map or Building Permits are issued. will be made conditions of approval or
included in the Development Agreement.
285 03.12 CM Coordinate City and School District efforts to PREZ TMAP X
/06.0 fund necessary school facilities and collect ANNE SDR wil DUSD has indicated that this project VIIIA6
payable fees. will not adversely impact the District
REZO and that the impacts can be mitigated by
payment of the standard school impact
fee (Sterling Fee) .
39
TASKS RELATED TO SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 9, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
� WHAT �5 THE AC�'ION OR 1`QEj�SUg�
NO M*rs 1k1 oc N
286
P ,
03.12
PW Coordinate City and Caltrans efforts to fund PREZ TMAP
/07.0 necessary freeway improvements and collect X A traffic study will identify impacts ANNE SDR and develop a fee to mitigateethe VIIIA7
developers' share of costs.
287 03.12 CM Coordinate City and DSRSD efforts to fund REZO project s fair share of these impacts.
PREZ/08.0 utilities services and collect developer's ANNE SDRP X See DSRSD comments letter dated 9/21/94 VIIIA8
share of costs.
REZO
•
•
40
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
REGIONAL DISCOUNT
RETAIL CENTER
Dublin, California
Prepared for
—
Homart Community Centers
Prepared by
— Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc.
November 1994
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
REGIONAL DISCOUNT
RETAIL CENTER
- Dublin, California
Prepared for
Homart Community Centers
Prepared by
_ Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc.
November 1994
Contents
Chapters Page
Executive Summary iii
1 Introduction 1
2 Existing Conditions 4
3 Background(1995)Conditions 10
4 1995 Project Conditions 14
5 Freeway Impacts 22
6 Long-Range Project Impact 26
Appendices
Appendix A:Turning-Movement Volumes
Appendix B:Intersection Lane Geometries
Appendix C:Driveway Analysis Calculations
Appendix D:Ramp Volumes
Appendix E:Level of Service Calculations
Tables
1 Intersection Level of Service Definitions 7
2 Existing Intersection Levels of Service(PM Peak Hour) 7
3 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections 8
4 Existing Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service
(PM Peak Hour) 9
5 Background Conditions Intersection Levels of Service
(PM Peak Hour) 12
6 Background Conditions Unsignalized Intersection
Levels of Service(PM Peak Hour) 13
7 Regional Discount Retail Center—Trip Generation Estimates 15
8 Project Conditions Intersection Levels of Service(PM Peak Hour) 21
9 Volume-to-Capacity Ratios for Freeway Ramps 23
10 Levels of Service for Freeway Sections 24
11 Freeway Segment Levels of Service(PM Peak Hour) 25
Figures
1 Site Location 2
2 Existing PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 6
3 Background PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 11
-- 4 Project Trip Distribution 16
5 Project PM Peak-Hour Trips 17
794-TIA/653905.01000
Executive Summary
This report summarizes the results of the site traffic analysis conducted for the
proposed Regional Discount Retail Center project in Dublin,California.The project
site is located in the southeast corner of the Hacienda Drive and Dublin Boulevard
intersection.The site extends to Tassajara Creek in the east and to I-580 in the south.
The proposed project will consist of 800,000 square feet(s.f.)of retail space with an
expected completion date of 1995.
r This traffic analysis focused on 15 intersections located in the project site vicinity.The
analysis time period was the weekday PM peak-hour period.During that time period,
the proposed project is expected to generate a total of 2,520 trips(1,260 inbound/1,260
outbound).The daily trip generation on a typical weekday will be 27,108 trips.
The analysis of the 15 intersections near the site identified the extent of impacts
expected from project-generated traffic.These impacts were compared against the
recommended mitigation threshold as specified by the Cities of Dublin and Pleasanton.
The results of this traffic analysis indicated that:
1. Under 1995 conditions,signals need to be installed at Hacienda Drive/Dublin
Boulevard and Tassajara Drive/Dublin Boulevard to mitigate off-site project
impacts.
2. Under 1995 conditions,a full-access driveway on Hacienda Drive is recommended
and would be feasible.This driveway should be signalized.Two unsignalized
driveways are recommended on Dublin Boulevard.
3. Under 1995 conditions,the existing two-lane cross-sections for Dublin Boulevard
and Hacienda Drive in the vicinity of the site are adequate.However,turn pockets
should be added for right and left turns at the driveways.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. iii
Executive Summary
4. Under 2010 conditions,three full-access signalized driveways are recommended—
one on Hacienda Drive and two on Dublin Boulevard.
5. This project conforms to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.The off-site road
improvements included in the plan will be needed to accommodate 2010 traffic
levels,and this project should contribute its fair share toward the cost of those
improvements.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. iv
- 1.
Introduction
This report presents the results of the traffic impact analysis conducted for the
proposed Regional Discount Retail Center in Dublin,California.The project site is
located in the southeast corner of the Hacienda Drive and Dublin Boulevard intersec-
tion.The site extends to Tassajara Creek in the east and to I-580 in the south.The
proposed project will include 800,000 s.f.of retail space developed by 1995.The site
location is shown on Figure 1.Access to the site will be provided by driveways on
Hacienda Drive and on Dublin Boulevard.
—
The impacts of the proposed development were evaluated following the guidelines set
forth by the City of Dublin.Fifteen existing key intersections in the vicinity of the site
were selected.Thirteen were evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization
(ICU)level of service methodology.The key signalized intersections are:
— Dougherty Road at Dublin Boulevard
Dougherty Road at I-580 WB Off-Ramp
Dougherty Road at I-580 EB Off-Ramp
Hopyard Road at Owens Drive
Hopyard Road at Stoneridge Drive
Hacienda Drive at I-580 WB Off-Ramp
Hacienda Drive at I-580 EB Off-Ramp
—
Hacienda Drive at Owens Drive
Hacienda Drive at Stoneridge Drive
Tassajara Road at I-580 WB Off-Ramp
Santa Rita Road at I-580 EB Off-Ramp
Santa Rita Road at Las Positas Boulevard
Santa Rita Road at Stoneridge Drive.
—
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 1
I 1 ► r I r I r I ► r I I r r r r 1 r
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
,17
2 (Not to Scale)
go _--
on4 $A ° O os_r_U"u yl/
Nd °p;e
0,'/" /
0- i
o > 4
001 DOB(ryy B[ •
Dublin
40/. t'' -N N -
NW I N V 04.4
STONERID GE DR
'.$� I
,po D
S poSITAS A
W.U N
PP
LEGEND 0 A
O
Site Location 40, Pleasanton o
t: :: = „
10 Figure 1
• = Study Intersection /
SITE LOCATION
Introduction
Two key intersections,Hacienda Drive at Dublin Boulevard and Tassajara Road at
Dublin Boulevard,are currently unsignalized.They were evaluated using the 1985
Highway Capacity Manual method for unsignalized intersections(NOSIGNAL).In
addition,the project driveways were analyzed.
The operating conditions of the key intersections were evaluated for the following
scenarios:
Scenario 1: Existing Conditions—Existing PM peak-hour volumes.
Scenario 2: Background Conditions(1995)—Existing PM peak-hour volumes,
plus projected volumes from approved but not yet completed pro-
- jects which have completion dates no later than 1995.
Scenario 3: Background Plus Project Conditions—Project-generated PM peak-
hour traffic volumes for the proposed project plus the projected
volumes from Scenario 2.
In addition,the site driveway intersections were analyzed for year 2010 conditions to
determine the required turn-lane configurations under buildout of the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan.The project conforms to the specific plan.The off-site impacts of this
project and the remainder of the specific plan under year 2010 conditions were
analyzed in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR.
Chapter 2 describes the Existing Conditions regarding the site as they relate to traffic
volumes,traffic operations of nearby intersections,major thoroughfares,and available
transit services.Chapter 3 describes the intersection operations for Background Condi-
tions.The method used to estimate the project traffic and descriptions of project
impacts are provided in Chapter 4.Chapter 5 describes the operations of the freeway,
freeway ramps,and key roadways in the vicinity of the project site under the various
scenarios.Chapter 6 describes the relationship of the project to the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan and lists the required road improvements that are a part of the specific
plan.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 3
2.
Existing Conditions
The transportation system(roadway network and transit service)serving the site,the
existing traffic volumes,and the operating conditions of the key intersections are de-
scribed in this chapter.
Existing Transportation System
Roadway Network
Regional access to the site is provided by two major freeways,I-580 and I-680.I-580
connects the project site to I-680,Hayward,the East Bay,Livermore,and Tracy.I-680
connects the project site to Fremont,Danville,and Walnut Creek.
Roadways that provide local access to the site are described below:
Dublin Boulevard is a four-lane,east/west route with sidewalks on both sides of the
street and an intermittent raised median west of Dougherty Road.Dublin Boulevard
was extended recently east to Tassajara Road.The extension is two lanes with a plan
to be ultimately six lanes.Land use along Dublin Boulevard is mostly
commercial/retail.
Dougherty Road IHopyard Road is a north/south route which varies in width from four
lanes to six lanes and has an interchange with I-580.North of I-580 Dougherty Road
has a bike path(two-way bike lanes)on the east side of the street.South of I-580
Hopyard Road has bike lanes on both sides of the street.Land use along this route is
mostly business and commercial.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 4
Existing Conditions
Hacienda Drive is a north/south route which varies in width from two to six lanes and
has an interchange with I-580.The land use along Hacienda Drive is mostly business
parks.
Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road is a north/south route which is two lanes between
Camino Tassajara and I-580,and then varies in width from four to six lanes south of
I-580.There is an interchange with I-580.Land use along Tassajara Road is mainly
rural.Land use along Santa Rita Road is a mix of commercial and residential.
Existing Transit Service
Bus service in the Tri-Valley area is provided by Contra Costa Transit Authority
(CCTA)-County Connection,Livermore Area Valley Transit Authority(LAVTA)
Wheels,and Bay Area Rapid Transit(BART)express buses.None of these providers
have routes which access the site.The closest routes run south of I-580 and serve the
business centers of Hacienda Business Park.
Existing Traffic Volumes
Traffic volumes for 13 of the 15 intersections were obtained from the cities of Dublin
and Pleasanton.Manual turning-movement counts were taken at the remaining two
intersections,Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard and Tassajara Road/Dublin Boulevard,
during the PM peak-hour(4:00 PM to 6:00 PM)on Thursday,January 20,1994,and
Tuesday,January 25, 1994 respectively.The turning movements for the PM peak-hour
_ are presented on Figure 2.Summaries of the complete turning-movement counts for
the PM peak period are given in Appendix A.Lane configurations at the study
intersections are given in Appendix B.
Existing Intersection Levels of Service
The operating conditions of the key intersections were evaluated with level of service
(LOS)calculations.Level of service is a qualitative description of an intersection's
operation,ranging from LOS A,or free-flow conditions with little or no delay time at
the intersection,to LOS F,or highly congested conditions with long delays at the
intersection.
A signalized intersection's level of service can be calculated using a number of
methods.For this study,a method based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual,
called the Intersection Capacity Utilization(ICU)method was used.This method is
based on critical,or governing,intersection movements.The volumes of cars(V)on a
critical movement are summed and divided by the total intersection capacity(C).This
V/C ratio of each critical movement at an intersection is used to produce an overall
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 5
Barton-Aschman Associates, In
1
^
ti
oOc
w
0 N� o' t_ 140
l^ 4 - 109
>
0
ov L 629
�,
o
DUBL/N 5�
294 so
0
121 -�OFF-RAMP
130550
Sg
O
\
966 �y Q
,�pP
ON
pO
�L
'dl
b
�o
�a
6
ti5
At,
��� • / �4
DR
C. L 149
0 Nl�_ 605
129
PO
44
11
i 0V✓E<IS
STSTONERIDGE
®� OR
DUBLIN BL
79a—?'
604
659 icy �'
�7
479 —� a u� co m
3 J N
a
�9
O
2
W
7
9
0
Q
i 00
�q b
70
136
O� o N / ry
/ G
OWENS DR y .�' � �3
?0'
O /\SN90
T ��q
2>4 \T 1-580
e i� ON-RAMPQD
34S \�•i� �J� d>
w
Go _p
k /
10
11C
12
t- 5
m m 4-541
K
N+
co into
1
.
STONERIDGE DR
a,
P
,� ao
S30
122
755 —� T
DUBLIN BL
1_580
ON- ;g P
`S8o
o
k I O
�
W
U
N
y
13
14
15 I
Q
~
N °
L 144
309
I ,� 6173
\ �— 44
♦♦♦� STONERIDGE OR
159
53�6 PIMLJCO
B
POE54
SI�
t
137
/7
iZ D j:No
627
O
�
* = Site Location
(Not to Some)
OEM
Existing Conditions
intersection V/C ratio.The overall V/C ratio is then correlated to a level of service(see
Table 1).The results of the level of service analysis for the 13 signalized intersections
are presented in Table 2.
Table 1
Intersection Level of Service Definitions
Level of
Service Interpretation V/C Ratio
A Uncongested operations;all queues clear in a single signal Less Than 0.600
cycle.
B Very light congestion;an occasional approach phase is fully 0.600-0.699
utilized.
C Light congestion;occasional backups on critical approaches. 0.700-0.799
D Significant congestion on critical approaches,but intersection 0.800-0.899
functional.Cars required to wait through more than one cycle
during short peaks.No long-standing queues formed.
E Severe congestion with some long-standing queues on critical 0.900-0.999
approaches.Blockage of intersection may occur if traffic signal
does not provide for protected turning movements.Traffic
queue may block nearby intersections(s)upstream of critical
approach(es).
F Total breakdown,stop-and-go operation. 1.000 and Greater
Table 2
Existing Intersection Levels of Service (PM Peak Hour)
Intersection V/C LOS
Dougherty Road at Dublin Boulevard 0.63 B
Dougherty Road at 1-580 WB Off-Ramp 0.70 B
Hopyard Road at 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0.84 D
Hopyard Road at Owens Drive 0.68 B
Hopyard Road at Stoneridge Drive 0.58 A
Hacienda Drive at 1-580 WB Off-Ramp 0.07 A
Hacienda Drive at 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0.20 A
Hacienda Drive at Owens Drive 0.45 A
Hacienda Drive at Stoneridge Drive 0.32 A
Tassajara Road at 1-580 WB Off-Ramp 0.22 A
Santa Rita Road at 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0.54 A
Santa Rita Road at West Las Positas Boulevard 0.44 A
Santa Rita Road at Stoneridge Drive 0.54 A
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 7
Existing Conditions
All of the signalized intersections operate at LOS D or better.LOS D is generally
considered to be an acceptable operating condition for major intersections.The City of
Dublin's guiding policy on level of service indicates that development and roadway
improvement should be phased so that the operating level of service for major street
intersections in Dublin shall not be worse than LOS D.This policy is a level of service
goal,not a level of service standard.The intersection at Hopyard Road and I-580 EB
Off ramp,which is shown to operate at LOS D,is currently under construction.The
LOS calculated for this intersection was determined for the reduced number of lanes
that are currently operational.
The two key unsignalized intersections were also evaluated with level of service
calculations.For these two intersections,the reserve capacity method for unsignalized
intersections found in Chapter 10 of the Highway Capacity Manual was used.
Unsignalized intersections are evaluated by comparing the volumes of vehicles on
different legs of an intersection to the capacities of the legs of an intersection.The
capacity of the intersection legs is based on roadway characteristics such as lane
geometries,travel speed,and distribution of gaps in which to execute crossing or
turning maneuvers.The level of service definitions for this method are presented in
Table 3.
Table 3
Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections
Level of Reserve Capacity
Service Expected Delay to Minor Street Traffic (PCPH)'
A Little or no delay. Greater than 400
B Short traffic delays. 300 to 399
_ C Average traffic delays. 200 to 299
D Long traffic delays. 100 to 199
E Very long traffic delays. 0 to 99
F Demand exceeds capacity resulting in extreme delays Less than 0
and queuing.
•PCPH—Passenger Cars per Hour
Source:Transportation Research Board,Highway Capacity Manual,Special Report 209
(Washington,D.C.,1985),pp.9-10.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 8
Existing Conditions
The results of the unsignalized level of service evaluation are presented in Table 4.
Each movement at an intersection that has a conflicting movement is assigned a level
of service.By looking at the different movements it can be seen that both intersections
are operating with little or no delay,and with acceptable levels of service.
Table 4
Existing Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service
(PM Peak Hour)
Intersection/Movement PCPH LOS
Hacienda Drive and Dublin Boulevard
Minor Street
Westbound Right 849 A
Westbound Left 435 A
Major Street
Southbound Left 828 A
Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard
Minor Street
Eastbound Right 722 A
Eastbound Left 415 A
Major Street
Northbound Left 908 A
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 9
3.
Background (1995) Conditions
This chapter discusses the impacts of background traffic volumes on the roadway
network for the year 1995.Background traffic volumes are defined as existing traffic
volumes plus growth plus traffic generated by other approved projects.
Background Traffic Estimates
No land development projects have yet been approved in the Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan area.However,the East Dublin/Pleasanton BART station will soon be completed,
and this will add traffic to Dublin Boulevard.The station is located along Dublin
Boulevard between Dougherty Road and Hacienda Drive.The City of Pleasanton has
also approved development that will affect some of the study intersections.Back-
ground traffic estimates were obtained for the nine Pleasanton intersections from the
Traffic Counts for Baseline 1993,prepared by TJKM Traffic Consultants for the City of
Pleasanton,February 1993.In addition to traffic counts for the 1993 period,this
document also contains turning-movement volumes for existing plus approved vol-
-
umes.The approved volumes are determined from a survey of building occupancy and
of residential projects.These approved volumes represent short-term changes in traffic
conditions.It is therefore appropriate to use them directly for background estimates.
Where existing plus approved volumes cause the intersection LOS to decrease to
LOS E or worse,intersection improvements are proposed and funded.These improve-
ments are included for background conditions.For the intersections in the City of
Dublin,some traffic growth is assumed for the intersections based on the BART
station having 1,350 parking spaces.The background traffic volumes are shown on
Figure 3.The background assumed lane configurations are shown in Appendix B.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 10
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.—
1 2
m m n ' _,wr,DO yo L
L14 4_,... v 1 _T34 N 87+50 32,
°UBU BL r r\ r 1-580 (Not to scair)
121_1' 9[��C ti OFF-RAP\
130" _'1/ \\ k ''S6, P ' \„
_ Alpo
4 5 "
Tt �/ee t.&I- L\ 2Z,
9
te,
° S STSTONERIDGE DR
3°8
�5 1.006-4 t.
�S�F �g 611 o m,+ 11
12 kr,
7 8 ) 4
PIMLICO
b$ry 13
L 213 /��
1- 323 �/ ON,
- O I q •p ?Z\�1 I-580 QP
—� \i. JI, ON-RANI 14
e
STONERIDGE DR
10 11 15
— z-w 2 1
�1�► ra -
SrONER10GE DR J Ao
198-• 41 t ro DUBUN BL 1 {'.,I
1.027—B p Hn 22-f I Z
---4. 138—, c
- Y;^y«
— 13 c 14 Pleasanton
Q
L 9,
— O. Sep / i ��/ 4--121
••+os�� �PINIJCO VS PpSR� �'t Figure 3
r 9
-IOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Background 1995 Conditions
Background Intersections Levels of Service
Intersection level of service calculations were performed for the 13 signalized intersec-
tion using background traffic volumes.The V/C ratio and LOS results obtained from
these calculations are shown in Table 5.
Table 5
Background Conditions Intersection Levels of Service
(PM Peak Hour)
1995
Intersection V/C LOS
Dougherty Road at Dublin Boulevard 0.68 B
Dougherty Road at 1-580 WB Off-Ramp 0.79 C
Hopyard Road at 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0.71 C
Hopyard Road at Owens Drive 0.83 D
Hopyard Road at Stoneridge Drive 0.78 C
Hacienda Drive at 1-580 WB Off-Ramp 0.23 A
Hacienda Drive at 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0.32 A
Hacienda Drive at Owens Drive 0.76 C
Hacienda Drive at Stoneridge Drive 0.47 A
_ Tassajara Road at 1-580 WB Off-Ramp 0.31 A
Santa Rita Road at 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0.68 B
Santa Rita Road at West Las Positas Boulevard 0.65 B
Santa Rita Road at Stoneridge Drive 0.86 D
Intersection level of service calculations were performed for the two unsignalized
intersections using background traffic volumes.The reserve capacity and LOS results
obtained from these calculations are shown in Table 6.
As can be seen from Tables 5 and 6,all of the intersections operate under acceptable
conditions under background conditions.
— Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 12
Background 1995 Conditions
Table 6
Background Conditions Unsignalized Intersection
Levels of Service (PM Peak Hour)
Intersection/Movement PCPH LOS
Hacienda Drive and Dublin Boulevard
_ Minor Street
Westbound Right 791 A
Westbound Left 167 D
Major Street
Southbound Left 795 A
Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard
Minor Street
Eastbound Right 722 A
Eastbound Left 415 A
Major Street
Northbound Left 906 A
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 13
4.
1995 Project Conditions
The impacts of the proposed Regional Discount Retail Center are discussed in this
chapter.The project consists of 800,000 s.f.of development with a completion date of
1995.First,the method used to estimate the amount of traffic added to the roadway
system by the project is described.Then,individual intersections are evaluated under
Project Conditions.Project Conditions are defined as Background Conditions plus
additional traffic generated by the project development.
Project Traffic Estimates
The amount of traffic associated with a project is estimated using a three-step process:
(1)trip generation,(2)trip distribution and(3)trip assignment.In the first step,trip
generation,the amount of traffic entering and exiting the site is estimated on a peak-
hour basis.In the second step,trip distribution,the directions the project trips use to
approach and depart the site are estimated.The trips are assigned to specific streets
and intersections in the third step,trip assignment.The use of this process for this
analysis is described in the following sections.
Trip Generation
The amount of traffic generated by the proposed project is estimated based on stan-
dard rates for shopping centers found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE),Trip Generation,Fifth Edition.The ITE's definition of a shopping center is"an
integrated group of commercial establishments which is planned,developed,owned
and managed as a unit."In addition to commercial units,other associated uses such as
office buildings,movie theaters,post offices,banks,health clubs,and recreational
facilities are also included in the definition of shopping center.The shopping center
trip generation rate is an average trip rate.Since the actual distribution of land uses
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 14
1995 Project Conditions
on the site has not been established,the rates associated with the possible land uses
may vary from the shopping center rate since some uses might have higher rates and
some lower.The use of the general shopping center rates however,should conserva-
tively estimate the number of trips generated.Using this rate,the proposed project is
expected to generate 2,520 PM peak-hour trips(1,260 inbound/1,260 outbound).Trip
_ generation rates are shown in Table 7.
Table 7
Regional Discount Retail Center—Trip Generation Estimates
AM PM
Peak-Hour Trips Peak-Hour Trips
Land Use Trip Rates In Out Total Trip Rates In Out Total Daily
Shopping Center
800,000 s.f. 0.69 Trips/ 277 277 554 3.15 Trips/ 1,260 1,260 2,520 27,108
1,000 s.f. 1,000 s.f.
Source:ITE Trip Generation,Land Use Code 820—Shopping Center.
The trip generation rates for the shopping center use are higher in the PM peak hour
than in the AM peak hour.Therefore,a study of the PM peak hour presents the worst-
case scenario for the project during the day.
Trip Distribution
The trip distribution pattern was based on the Year 2000 Tri-Valley Transportation
Model.The Year 2000 Tri-Valley Transportation Model assumes some commercial
development at or near the project location.Directions of approach and departure were
estimated from the model and then trips were distributed based on both existing and
future(year 2000)traffic patterns in the area and the roadway network.Figure 4
shows the major directions of approach and departure.
Trip Assignment
The trips generated by the proposed development are assigned to the roadway system
based on the directions of approach and departure discussed above.All project trips
were assigned to the site driveways based on their respective directional distributions.
Figure 5 shows the project trips.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 15
► 1 1 1 ► I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ► 1 1 1 1 1 1
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
I Ii. n 2
® `y,.pp.4 9� (Not to Seale)
2 t 0 _
O
W O N \t
(2,440) 8 ��
ilk
�r
��►- A ,
DUBLIN0,BL I (6,780)
Dublin (10,83�0difilf, r' 5%
—1.
®.� 44"*".1
PIM(ICO04.2 S 6,
LEGEND
= Site Location (�g00)
_O_ liii.21:7
STONERIDGE DR
(XX) = Daily Traffic $3NLn -J io
4 o O
Pa O J
W. LAS POSITAS BL
l 101O
Pleasanton
A 21, 19% (270
( gg5 0) o4 (5,150) �� Figure 4
- MICRO DISTRIBUTION PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
1
2
3 I
tia
113
r 25
NiP
\
Pp �aOQ
DUBLIiy BL i
y 1-580
OFF -RAMP
� Q
O�
R
10 DtA ooG \�,s
Rgyo \ems
�.,
pC� t� �
�p
P
O
4
5
y
03
p
`O
�r 25
v
176
�OWENS OR
63
STONERIDGE DR
DUBUN BL
S (�
25go
N
u+ �
r-
D tNn
v
w
�
0
U
4y
7
g
9
o
+
n
1
L
i y
O
�O
OWENS DR ,Z3'
214
♦ �•SB
$fig I-580
ON -RAMP
6S
�,o
n
go
10
11
12
c
N
�
N
t'
STONERIDGE 0R
I
I_580 70,
63 -S
DUBUN BL
ON- RAMP ♦ , S
0
13 —S
o 80
Oct.R
10
@0
Z
W
227 �•
n
N
Cq
@U
Z
~
13
14
15
e
CoIT
s8o
Co
n
w
o�
®
®-°
1
♦
STONERIDGE OR
PIMUCO
POSE/
Y1•
18
v
y Cp
�
/
a
v
)RIVEWAY A
W
88
�- 605
N
IM
= Site Location
96
196 —�
� O
a O
N
144
131 —�
N O
(Not to Socae)
1995 Project Conditions
1995 Site Access Analysis
Trip distribution at the driveway level was determined based on the volumes of
vehicles entering and exiting the site and on the physical location of the site and
surrounding intersections.Two different access scenarios were considered.The first,
which is recommended,assumes a full-access driveway on Hacienda Drive and two
full-access driveways on Dublin Boulevard.The second assumes a right-turn-in and
-out driveway on Hacienda Drive and two full-access driveways on Dublin Boulevard.
The project driveway on Hacienda Drive would be located halfway between the
intersections of Hacienda Drive and the I-580 westbound off-ramp and Hacienda Drive
and Dublin Boulevard.The project driveways on Dublin Boulevard should be located a
minimum distance of 660 feet from the Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard intersection.
Any traffic signals installed on Dublin Boulevard should be evenly spaced between the
intersections at Hacienda Drive and Tassajara Road.For both access scenarios,the
existing two-lane cross-section on Hacienda Drive is sufficient;however,left-turn and
right-turn pockets should be added to serve the proposed project driveway.On Dublin
Boulevard the two-lane cross-section is also sufficient.Left-turn pockets should be
added at both project driveways,and a right-turn pocket should be added at the
western driveway.
Recommended Access Scenario
The recommended access scenario,assuming a full-access driveway on Hacienda Drive
and two full-access driveways on Dublin Boulevard,was evaluated for traffic opera-
tions at the project driveways.Evaluation of the full-access driveway as an
unsignalized intersection using the NOSIGNAL software indicates that the intersec-
tion would operate below acceptable standards.Specifically,the left turns out of the
project site would not have enough capacity,resulting in LOS F for that movement.
Installation of a traffic signal at the project driveway would improve the LOS of the
intersection to acceptable standards LOS B(V/C=0.63).
The feasibility of the full-access driveway on Hacienda Drive is dependent on coordina-
- tion with the intersections of Hacienda Drive and Dublin Boulevard and Hacienda
Drive and I-580 westbound off-ramps(approximately 600 feet to the north and south
of the project driveway)and on the operation of the project driveway,including the
turning queues.In order to determine whether the signal at the driveway would
interfere with the intersections to the north or south of it,an evaluation of queue
lengths was undertaken.Using the CAPSSI-11 software,which calculates average
queue length for each approach of the three intersections,an estimation of how much
storage length is required for vehicles at the three intersections was determined using
an average length per vehicle of 25 feet.None of the estimated traffic queues would
interfere with traffic operations at any of the three affected intersections.Appendix C
contains a detailed schematic of calculated queue lengths and driveway LOS
calculations.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 18
1995 Project Conditions
From this preliminary analysis,under current conditions,a signalized full-access
driveway located on Hacienda Drive would operate at acceptable levels of service and
without interference with either adjacent intersection.
For this access scenario,which assumes two driveways on Dublin Boulevard,both
driveways would operate at acceptable levels of service as unsignalized intersections.
Alternate Access Scenario
The second access scenario,assuming a right-turn-in and-out driveway on Hacienda
Drive and two full-access driveways on Dublin Boulevard,was also evaluated for
traffic operations at the project driveways.This alternate scenario differs from the
recommended scenario only in that the Hacienda driveway would operate under
acceptable levels of service as an unsignalized intersection.Unlike the recommended
access scenario,for this scenario neither of the Dublin Boulevard driveways would
operate under acceptable levels of service as unsignalized intersections.If the drive-
way nearest Hacienda Drive was signalized,then the other driveway would operate at
acceptable levels of service as an unsignalized intersection.If the near driveway was
signalized,it is projected to operate at LOS A(V/C=0.57).
On-Site Circulation
No specific site plan has been developed as to circulation on site.Care should be taken
when designing the plan to accommodate the vehicles waiting at the driveway(s)to
enter and exit the site.The site should also be designed in mind for alternative forms
of transportation to encourage transit,carpool,and bicycle usage.Specific design items
might include bus stops,bus shelters,and bike racks.
Project Access Under 2010 Conditions
While short-term conditions show that the Alternate Access Scenario is feasible,
projected future traffic conditions make this alternative undesirable.Due to increased
projected traffic volumes on Hacienda Drive and Dublin Boulevard and to ensure
adequate access to the project site,three signalized full-access driveways should be
provided.One driveway should be located on Hacienda Drive and two driveways on
Dublin Boulevard.These three driveways would serve to spread project traffic across
the site and minimize the impact due to project traffic on the extremely high traffic
volume facilities of Hacienda Drive and Dublin Boulevard.If there are three drive-
ways,as in the recommended access scenario,the Hacienda Drive driveway and both
Dublin Boulevard driveways would operate with acceptable levels of service.If there
was not a full-access driveway on Hacienda Drive,as in the alternate access scenario,
then both Dublin Boulevard driveways and the Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard
intersection would operate at LOS F.
Barton-Aschman Associates,inc. 19
1995 Project Conditions
At the Hacienda Drive driveway,dual inbound left-turn lanes should be provided.
Dual outbound left-turn lanes should also be provided.These will minimize the
interruption to flow on Hacienda Drive and minimize queue lengths.An inbound right-
turn lane of 450 feet should also be provided.With this design,the queue lengths will
not overlap at the three intersections along Hacienda Drive,which are assumed to be
signalized in 2010,provided the signals are synchronized.(See Appendix C for the
queue length calculations.)At the two Dublin Boulevard driveways,provision should
be made in the median width to allow for dual left-turn pockets.A right-turn pocket
should be provided at the western driveway,but none is needed at the eastern
driveway.
Intersection Levels of Service
Intersection level of service calculations were conducted to evaluate the impacts of the
proposed project.Background conditions served as a base from which to evaluate the
impacts of the project.The PM peak-hour trip assignments for the proposed project
were added to the background volumes.The results of the calculations are presented
in Table 8.The intersections of Hacienda/Dublin and Tassajara/Dublin are assumed to
be signalized since they will meet warrants,as described below.
A negative impact is defined as a worsening in level of service from LOS D or better to
LOS E or worse for the City of Dublin.In the case where an intersection is already
operating at an unacceptable level of service(lower than LOS D),a negative impact is
defined as an increase in V/C by 0.02 or greater.This significance threshold is based
upon the point at which a noticeable increase in traffic volume occurs.For the City of
Pleasanton,no intersections may operate below LOS D.
As can be seen from Table 8,all of the key intersections will operate at acceptable
levels of service under project conditions.
Traffic Signal Warrants
An indicator of project impact on unsignalized intersections,in addition to a decrease
in level of service,is the need for a traffic signal.Justification for installation of a
traffic signal can be based on the warrants stated in the State of California Depart-
ment of Transportation Traffic Manual and in the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control
Devices.Both the Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard intersection and the Tassajara
.. Road/Dublin Boulevard intersection will meet the peak-hour warrant under project
conditions.Installation of traffic signals at both of these locations should be consid-
ered.In conjunction with signalization,the turn pockets may need to be lengthened.
The northbound left-turn pocket at Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard should be
300 feet in length.If a single left-turn pocket is not feasible due to roadway width
constraints,a dual left-turn lane of 150 feet in length would also be sufficient.This
should be studied in conjunction with final signal design.Consideration should be
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 20
1995 Project Conditions
given to the location of the signals due to the fact that Dublin Boulevard is planned to
be widened to six lanes in the future.The project will pay for their fair share of the
Eastern Dublin Traffic Impact Fee Program,which is designed to pay for
improvements required by development in Eastern Dublin.This program would cover
cost of installing and/or modifying these traffic signals for the year 2010.
Table 8
Project Conditions Intersection Levels of Service (PM Peak Hour)
Background Project
Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS
Dougherty Road at Dublin Boulevard 0.68 B 0.72 B
—
Dougherty Road at 1-580 WB Off-Ramp 0.79 C 0.79 C
Hopyard Road at 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0.71 C 0.72 C
Hopyard Road at Owens Drive 0.83 D 0.84 D
— Hopyard Road at Stoneridge Drive 0.78 C 0.80 C
Hacienda Drive at 1-580 WB Off-Ramp 0.23 A 0.40 A
Hacienda Drive at 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0.32 A 0.48 A
Hacienda Drive at Owens Drive 0.76 C 0.78 C
Hacienda Drive at Stoneridge Drive 0.47 A 0.51 A
Tassajara Road at 1-580 WB Off-Ramp 0.31 A 0.35 A
Santa Rita Road at 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0.68 B 0.70 B
Santa Rita Road at West Las Positas Boulevard 0.65 B 0.68 B
Santa Rita Road at Stoneridge Drive 0.86 D 0.87 D
Hacienda Drive at Dublin Boulevard — — 0.55 A
— Tassajara Road at Dublin Boulevard — — 0.30 A
Hacienda Drive at Project Driveway — — 0.63 B
Western Driveway at Dublin Boulevard' — — — B
Eastern Driveway at Dublin Boulevard' — — — A
•Unsignalized,LOS listed is for worst movement.
Transit Impacts
The Eastern Dublin area is presently undeveloped and has no transit service.The
—
Livermore-Amador Valley Transit Authority(LAVTA)provides local bus transit service
in Dublin,Pleasanton,and Livermore,as well as unincorporated areas of Alameda
County.This transit service will need to be extended to the project both because the
project will create demand for service and because local and regional policies call for
giving people a choice in modes.In accordance with the policies of the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan,the project developer will need to coordinate with LAVTA and contribute
—
a proportionate amount to the capital and operating costs of transit service extensions.
— Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. P1
5.
Freeway Impacts
This chapter discusses the impacts of project generated trips on the key freeway inter-
changes and freeway segments in the vicinity of the project site.The key freeway
interchanges are:
I-580/I-680
I-580/Dougherty Road/Hopyard Road
I-580/Hacienda Drive
I-580/Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road.
These facilities were evaluated based on a comparison of the PM peak-hour volume to
capacity ratios on each roadway segment and freeway ramp,across the different
scenarios.Existing freeway ramp volumes were obtained from the Caltrans District 4,
Census Unit.The freeway ramp volumes from Caltrans are included in Appendix D.
Existing I-580 counts were based on the 1990 Tri-Valley Transportation Model.Project
trips for all scenarios were added to these volumes to obtain I-580 and freeway ramp
volumes for the 1995 Project scenario.
Freeway Ramps
A direct comparison of volume-to-capacity(V/C)ratios was performed for the key
freeway ramps.For the freeway-to-surface street ramps a capacity of 1,600 vehicles
per hour per lane was used to determine the V/C ratio.For the freeway-to-freeway
ramps located at the I-580 and I-680 interchange,a ramp capacity of 2,000 vehicles
per hour per lane was used to determine the V/C ratio.The results of the V/C compari-
son for the key freeway ramps are shown on Table 9.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 22
Roadway and Freeway Impacts
Table 9
Volume-to-Capacity Ratios for Freeway Ramps
Background
Location Existing Plus Project
Dougherty Road/I-580/Hopyard
WB Off to Dougherty Road 0.27 0.27
NB Hopyard to WB On 0.62 0.62
SB Hopyard to WB On 0.33 0.33
EB Off to Hopyard 0.40 0.40
NB Hopyard to EB On 0.27 0.27
SB Hopyard to EB On 0.47 0.47
Hacienda Drive/I-580
- WB Off to Hacienda Drive 0.07 0.20
NB Hacienda Drive to WB On 0.35 0.35
SB Hacienda Drive to WB On 0.00 0.30
EB Off to Hacienda Drive 0.20 0.50
NB Hacienda Drive to EB On 0.24 0.24
SB Hacienda Drive to EB On 0.00 0.14
- Tassajara Road/I-580/Santa Rita
WB Off to Tassajara Road 0.37 0.44
NB Tassajara Road to WB On 0.44 0.44
SB Tassajara Road to WB On 0.05 0.05
NB Tassajara Road to EB On 0.48 0.48
SB Tassajara Road to EB On 0.05 0.11
EB Off to Tassajara Road 0.68 0.68
1-580/1-680
NB 1-680 to EB 1-580 0.76 0.81
NB 1-680 to WB 1-580 0.57 0.57
EB 1-580 to SB 1-680 0.70 0.70
EB 1-580 to NB 1-680 0.50 0.50
SB 1-680 to WB 1-580 0.23 0.23
SB 1-680 to EB 1-580 0.75 0.78
WB 1-580 to NB 1-680 0.88 0.94
WB 1-580 to SB 1-680 0.22 0.27
All of the ramps at the key intersections operate below capacity during Existing
Conditions,as well as with the project.The project traffic,therefore,can be accommo-
dated by the existing ramps.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 23
— Roadway and Freeway Impacts
Freeway Segments
For the freeway segments,the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual utilizes density of the
freeway traffic stream as the parameter to define the level of service,and has pub-
lished a table relating density to LOS,V/C,speed,and maximum service flow rate per
lane(see Table 10).
Table 10
Levels of Service for Freeway Sections
Level of
Service Description V/C Ratio
A Primarily free-flow operations.Vehicles are almost completely unim- Less than 0.36
peded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream
B Reasonably free-flow conditions.The ability to maneuver within the 0.36-0.54
traffic stream is only slightly restricted.
C Provides for stable operation,however flows approach the range in 0.55-0.77
which small increases will cause a substantial deterioration in service.
Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is noticeably restricted.
D Borders on unstable flow.Small increases in flow cause substantial 0.78-0.93
deterioration in service.Freedom to maneuver within the traffic
stream is severely limited.Minor incidents can be expected to create
substantial queuing,as the traffic stream has little space to absorb
disruptions.
E Operations are extremely unstable.Any incident can be expected to 0.94-1.00
produce a serious breakdown with extensive queuing.Maneuverabili-
ty within the traffic stream is extremely limited.
F Forced or breakdown conditions.Such conditions generally exist Greater than 1.00
within queues forming behind breakdown points.
Source:1985 Highway Capacity Manual for freeway sections with a 70 mph design speed and a
55 mph posted speed limit.
Capacity may vary from location to location,and it is commonly accepted in the state
of California that the freeway capacity is higher than the 2,000 vehicles per hour used
in the"Levels of Service for Basic Freeway Sections"table published in the Highway
Capacity Manual.Since capacity affects density,the level of service of the freeway
sections were estimated by comparison with the V/C ratio in the table rather than
with the density.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 24
Roadway and Freeway Impacts
On the freeway segments,the V/C ratio was determined using a capacity of 2,200
vehicles per hour per lane.The level of service and V/C results for the studied freeway
segments are presented in Table 11.
Under Existing and Project conditions,all of the freeway segments are projected to
operate at an acceptable level of service.
Table 11
Freeway Segment Levels of Service (PM Peak Hour)
Background
Existing Plus Project
Location V/C LOS V/C LOS
EB 1-580 Between 1-680 and Dougherty 0.83 D 0.89 D
WB 1-580 Between 1-680 and Dougherty 0.60 C 0.65 C
EB 1-580 Between Dougherty and Hacienda 0.90 D 0.96 E
WB 1-580 Between Dougherty and Hacienda 0.50 B 0.56 C
EB 1-580 Between Hacienda and Tassajara 0.90 D 0.93 D
WB 1-580 Between Hacienda and Tassajara 0.50 B 0.53 B
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 25
6.
Long-Range Project Impact
Long-range(year 2010)impacts of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan were identified in
the Eastern Dublin EIR.The proposed project is consistent with the Specific Plan,so
its long-range transportation impact is covered by the EIR.This chapter lists the
specific plan transportation assumptions and the EIR mitigation measures for
reference.
According to the EIR,the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan road network and transporta-
tion mitigation measures are to be funded by fees imposed on East Dublin develop-
ment.This project,as part of the development in East Dublin,should pay its fair
share toward the costs of the traffic program fees for the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Road Improvements
The following road improvements are either part of the Eastern Dublin General Plan
Amendment and Specific Plan or are mitigation measures from the EIR.Improvement
finance responsibility is divided into three sections;those for which Eastern Dublin
Development is 100 percent responsible,those for which the entire City of Dublin
(including Eastern Dublin)and possible other jurisdictions are responsible,and
improvments for which all jurisdictions in the Tri-Valley area,including Eastern
Dublin,are responsible.
The transportation improvements for which Eastern Dublin developments are 100
percent responsible are:
1. Dublin Boulevard.Extend and widen to six lanes from the Southern Pacific
Right-of-way to Airway Boulevard.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 26
Long-Range Project Impact
2. Hacienda Drive.Widen to four lanes from Dublin Boulevard to Gleason Drive
and to six lanes from I-580 to Gleason Drive.
3. Hacienda/I-580 Interchange Improvements.
4. Transit Spine.Construct four-lane road from Dublin Boulevard west of Hacien-
da Drive to Fallon Road.
5. Gleason Drive.Construct new four-lane road from west of Hacienda Drive to
east of Fallon Road(Doolan Road).
6. Tassajara Road.Widen to four lanes over a six-lane right-of-way from Dublin
Boulevard to the Contra Costa County Line,and to six lanes over an eight-lane
right-of-way from Dublin Boulevard to I-580.
7. Tassajara I I-580 Interchange.Modify and improve this interchange.
8. Fallon Road.Extend to Tassajara Road,widen to four lanes over a six-lane
right-of-way from I-580 to Tassajara Road.
9. Bicycle Path along Tassajara Creek.
10. TIF Study.
11. Street Alignment Study.
The transportation improvements for which Eastern Dublin developments,City of
Dublin developments and some other jurisdiction developments are responsible are:
1. Dublin Boulevard.Widen Dublin Boulevard to six lanes from Village Parkway
to the Southern Pacific Right-of-Way(entire City of Dublin's new development,
including Eastern Dublin,will be responsible for this segment).
2. Scarlett Drive(Southern Pacific Right-of-Way Connector).Construct a new four-
lane street from Dublin Boulevard to Dougherty Road(entire City of Dublin's
new development,including Eastern Dublin,will be responsible for this
project).
3. Dougherty Road.Widen to six lanes from north of I-580 to Contra Costa County
Limits(costs for this project will be shared by entire City of Dublin's new
development,including Eastern Dublin,and Contra Costa County).
4. I-580/Fallon Interchange Upgrade.Improve the interchange(costs of improving
this interchange will be divided among Eastern Dublin and developments in
the Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton,and Contra Costa County).
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 27
Long-Range Project Impact
5. Airway/I-580.Replace and improve this interchange(the cost should be divided
among the Eastern Dublin,Contra Costa County,and Livermore developers).
The transportation improvements for which all jurisdictions in the Tri-Valley area,
including Eastern Dublin,are responsible are:
1. 1-580 11-680 Interchange. Southbound-to-Eastbound Flyover and Dublin Hook
Ramps.
2. 1-580 Auxiliary Lanes. Tassajara to"East of Airway"assumed to be N.
Livermore Avenue.
3. Route 84. Complete and improve as a four-lane highway from I-680 to I-580,
including the interchange at SR 84/1-680.
4. Improve Transit Services.
Barton-Aschman Associates,Inc. 28
- Appendices
I
I
I
1
Appendix A
1 Turning-Movement Counts
I
1
I
I
1
I
'- ::2;EA22i :CUT :A:_
g.MC 229362..:A:o.:5
- :ASSAJA3A EEC•JIB::S E1270. .Aw :A:A
.3-Min 3ortn East South west
Ending -. :9 .. ET .. :9 :: ET ... _.
14:1ip 3 32 0 0 41 :1 :J
:4:30p 5 :12 11 ) 36 33
04:45p :36 0 : : ) :27 46 . ::
• )5:O0p _: 216 1 0 ) 199 :0 ?9 :3
35:15p 15 276 J 3 ) 269 70 :37 1 :3
„ 15:30p 18 325 ) 0 ) 9 331 34 175
15:45p :9 362 ) 0 : : 395 13 256
:6:00p 22 ;02 1 : 1 139 ::2 220 ..
:t 1catas :_:a arr:r - aact raw :ata.
0. . - TASSAJAEA 32i0381.I9 SLID. :'9TEEIA_ ...�..
15-Min 9orth East South West Int.
Ending ET TB 22 ET T9 3T T9 LT DT TB LT Total
04:15p 3 82 0 0 0 0 41 14 10 06 155
04:30p 3 60 ] 45 :?
04:45p 4 44 0 0 0 0 J 41 13 33 0 1 136
05:00p 1 30 0 0 0 0 72 14 31 0 8 155
05:15p 4 62 0 0 C 0 0 70 10 38 1 0 184
— 05:30p 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 52 14 38 J 7 171
05:45p 1 37 0 O 0 0 65 15 31 0 7 156
36:00p 3 40 1 0 J O 5 43 :3 .. J 5 1:8
Total 22 402 0 0 0 0 0 439 112 220 0 38 1233
t indicates data error -chect raw data.
1 -TASSAJAHA RDIDOBLIN BLVD. HOURLY SUMMARY
Hour Borth Bast South West Int.
lading RI TH LT IT TB LT IT TB LT HI TH LT Total
04:15p 3 82 0 0 41 14 10 0 5 155*
04:30p 6 142 3 0 86 33 35 0 10 3112t
04:45p 10 186 0 0 127 46 68 0 11 448*
.. 05:00p 11 216 0 0 199 60 99 0 19 604
05:15p 12 196 0 0 228 56 127 0 14 633
05:30p 12 183 0 0 245 51 140 0 16 647
05:45p 9 176 0 0 269 53 138 0 22 661
06:00p 11 186 0 0 240 52 121 0 19 629
* indicates partial hour total.
•
:UEl2A4 -;--
:a.K� {_-:3.:AC SON - 3;
06.
185/0.i3
NIS Street:
Hour indin;: 35:45p . 3 TASSAJAnA rD
176 291
0
�
•
62 <---+ 0
V :, 3.00
22 1 ,
1:71i;.-. 0
138 + <---- +---) 3
r V ! ; +
ciW Street:
DUBLIN 3LVD,
Intersection 53
314 269
Total Voi: 561 0
PH Factor: 0.91 ; •
322/0.94
_...'. RETAIL
:2s.C1ZAi
CDMBEIB.DACKSCN :A.
..
1 - HACIENDA DR./DD3LIN BLVD. 9.14 -,-,
▪ ::-Min ;forth East South West
Ending 2T TH ET :H _. _. _8
:4:15p 0 43 23 14 _ : 4 27 3 :
:4:30p J 74 43 23 J 47 3 :
)4:45p J 107 '1 31 0 7 59 C 3 0 :
:5:00p J 136 104 41 0 - 10 94 ) 3 3 :
05:15p 0 172 :46 48 10 140 3 2
5:30p 0 219 :76 65 14 15 186 : 3 0 :
35:45p 0 255 206 75 J15 17 217 3 3 ) :
yi :6:00p 0 271 220 93 0 19 239 0 3 0 :
Indicates data error - check raw data.
- HACIENDA DH.;DC.._:N BLVD. :NTEEVAL
oft :5-Min North East :Data west Int.
• Ending 2 TH 1. ET TH :T _: TH :1 ET 1l a1ita.
04:15p 0 43 20 14 0 2 4 21 0 3 0 0 113
)4:30p 0 31 23 9 0 : : 20 0 ) 0 35
04:45p 0 33 2a 8 0 1 : 22 0 0 0 94
0S:00p 0 29 33 10 0 3 3 25 0 0 3 0 103
05:15p 0 36 42 7 0 5 2 46 0 0 0 J 138
05:30p 0 47 30 17 0 2 3 46 0 J 0 145
05:45p 0 36 30 10 0 1 2 31 0 0 0 0 110
-• J6:00p 0 16 14 18 0 0 2 22 0 0 0 0 '2
Total 0 211 220 93 0 15 19 239 0 3 : ) 560
indicates data error - check raw data.
- HACIENDA DE.IDDELIN SLID. HOURLY SUY..AEi
Hour North East South West Int.
— Ending ET TH IT ET TH LT ET TH IT ET TH LT Total
04:15p 0 43 20 14 0 2 4 27 0 3 0 0 113*
04:30p 0 74 43 23 0 3 5 47 0 3 0 0 198*
04:45p 0 107 71 31 0 4 7 69 0 3 0 0 292*
05:00p 0 136 104 41 0 7 10 94 ) 3 0 395
35:15p 0 129 126 34 0 10 8 113 0 1 0 0 420
05:30p 0 145 133 42 0 11 10 139 0 0 0 0 480
05:45p 0 148 135 44 0 11 10 148 0 0 0 0 496
06:00p 0 135 116 52 0 8 9 145 0 0 0 0 465
indicates partial hour total.
UES. .__AS .CUNT DATE
71
.. 11EN;A .a.,DUSLIN 3LVD. ..,1.NINS ._A:.
283/0.i:
N/S Street:
Hour Ending: 05:45p ; 0 HACIENDA DR.
148 192
+ i i A +
0 (---+ +---> 44
V < 0 15/0, 2
1.
0
0 - c---. ---> 145
- V , +
: E1if Street:
DUBLIN BLVD.
intersection ; 0 ;
; 159 148
Total Vol: 496 10
?H Factor: 0.86
158/0.81
Appendix B
Intersection Lane Geometries
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. --
1 2
L
— 4--
t L
' N
11
B,N B.~ — \ I 4— 1-580
_ �� o �R a0` I�OFF-RAMP (Not to Scale)
o
37 ONE G
13
o PO
4 y 5 L
_ °
���� J/ OWENS DR ,_\ 111,44 iv__
Aidh STONERIDGE?C
Pe
—
6 11 �
- A� 12
7 8 /.>
c-g
0
— L 13 PlMuco
N
— o I r °z se I_s s 0P
w �Ma R /�r�N-R 14
PD
PG\el0
— N
AI STONERIDGE DR
10 11 15
� c,
4— Z
4-1.114
+11 "
STONERIDGE DR A
2v
+I T T� DUBLIN BL
_ T► o I - �T
W
U
2
13 a 14 Pleasanton
ce
°�se°11 z �1,i1 I LA
— �PIMLICO POS�PS 0� � t Figure B-1
/iI,� D G LANE CONFIGURATIONS
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.-
- 2
t— L
f— L L
DUBCry�C�
\�4I 1_580 N
3/4- OFF-RAMF
o �� g0 (Not to Scale)
f^ ---
Z �y Ot,i i.,
t
n T,
II 4 5 t
fl -aP�
_\Cuu WENs DR .1111I44 r
N�y •1' �, ;TO NERIDG
41T1
A
6 11n .
7 8 /� 12
y00
9Q
` , N 8 13 PIMLICO
o��o ryS
nW P /e 2> N 14 /
E'10 PO
41
r,
1 O 1 1 STONERIDGE DR
0
15
<
ii 11 ____5T NE DR .-1 Dc- p 'iT?A DUBLN BL� Aliz►a
e•. W
II 1
713 14 Pleasanton
1 1 g 4-s-
1,/4 ,�1,�144 .-
a �PIMLICO W 'S p05� `''' ^
/� 7 V . h`11 Figure B 2
77A %-i, 1 35 LANE CONFIGURATIONS
1
i
1
1
1
I Appendix C
Driveway Analysis Calculations
1 __
1 Hacienda Driveway
Ioft
a
:ubiln Retail . Inter _
Partial Access Project Or_vewav
BacKgr una F:us rroec . '°M Peak Hour ,
1985 HIGHWAY CAPACIT', MANUAL - JNSIGNAL i 2EJ INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORK SHEET
...a a a x a a as a a s a a s=a a--a.m....
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST —
VARIABLE RT TH LT RT TH PT -H PT TH LT
VOLUMES vpn) 0 940 0 28 0 0 605 3224 3 3 0 0
LANES ' 4 ) 0 0 0 J J 0 0 0
GRADE ': ) 0 0 0 0
HCTCR ' . 10 ' . 10 3.00
VOLUMES J 1034 , _T 225 J
CONTROL TYPE STOP AVERAGE EPEE: CESIPE: 7= MPH —
POPULATION , 1000' S 0 AVERAGE EFEE: .JEED1 35 MPH
==sa=acs s=s=xx=x===aa= ==a== =====a cas=x=asaaa=
Critical Potential Percent :mpecance Actual
MVMT Vc(vph ) Gap Capacity Utilization Factor Capacity
—
MINOR STREET - EAST APPROACH
RT 394 5.7 675 0. 143 0.905 675
LT 1334 6.8 124 0.000 1 .000 124 --
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
SOUTH 999 5. 1 378 0.000 1 .000 378 —
- xa== =aaa==aaa=xaaaaaa=x=aaa========xa====
LEVEL OF SERVICE
MVMT V(pcph ) CM(pcph ) C5h(pcph ) Cr-MVT Cr-SHRO MVT SHRO
MINOR STREET - EAST APPROACH
RT 97 675 578 A
LT 0 124 0 -
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
:a:l _ rater
..J11 Access Protect :Jr!vewav
:accgrcuno Plus Protect ;PM Dealt Fleur)
=85 H::HW'AY C.PACITY vANUAL - _NSIGNALIZZC :NTERSECT:OH CAPACITY .^JRKSAE
__ =i=:2i=`ii===i3==s===
NORTH EAST SOUTH VEST
ARIA6:E RT "„ LT RT
., ;T TH L7 RT TA -
:OLUME S (von) 3 335 ;.3 S.3 3 605 605
394 J 0
_ANES -') 0 4 1 0
:RADE T.) 1 0 0
i0 0 0
10E FACTOR 1.10 1.10
/DUNES (pcan) J 369 ;; :7 1.10 0.00
-- 666 oc6 �33
:CNTRCL TYPE STOP AVERAGE SPEED (DESIRED)
-OPULATICH ('COO'S) 35 MPS
AVERAGE S=EED (USED) 35 rPw
Critical ✓otent:a: ercent :"peaance &ctual
'V11T c(von) 3aD :a0ac.:•: ..:1tizat!cn Fg
ctor _anact:;
+INOR STREET • EAST APPROACH
--
RT 0 5.7 1000 3.097
=T 817 5,8 0.9G2 1000
276 Z.412 :.000 222
— MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
SOUTH 999 5.1 378 3.256 0.804
=___===f=ice==== 378
a=: ==========i===i==i==
LEVEL OF SERVICE
MVMT I(pcph) Ca(Dcpn) Csh(Dcan) Cr-MVT Cr-SHRD MVT SHRD
MINOR STREET - EAST APPROACH
RT 97 1000 903
.-.. LT 666 222
� F
�
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
SOUTH 97 378 281
---_=== iiiiii===:emu:�= C
=�
l
CCTA INTERSEECT:CH LEVEL CF SERVICE = ALYS:S -;8/94
CNDITION : 9acgKrcuna Plus Prc ect :ILE ..95sr.c
INTERSECT:CN : 9999 -URISDICTN :
N-S STREET : r,acienaa Dr:v E-W STREET : Project .rive
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:
CVC:T =0.4326 NODE
RIGHT T:=RU LEFT TOT V/C : =.35
0 744 88 L O S :
NODE I I I * NODE S WARR(U,7 : Y "
CVC:R =0.00001 <--I + I--> I CVC:L =0.1935
LEFT ---I 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 88 RIGHT
THRU ; ---> 0.0 (NO. CF LANES) 0.0 <--- 3 THRU
RIGHT ---I 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 I--- 005 LEFT --
I <--I 1--> I SPLIT?
I I
0 394 605
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE
CVC:T =:.2291 SPLIT? Y PHASE:
1 a
•
The ccnnccrcrcn - :ne intersectlen
a. of Hcciencc arc Dublin Elva. .s
proposes ;o nnange •.n the year 2000.
by extenc:nc C =.va. to the west.
rni This wncnce w��i � cuce construction c
c left t.:rr. Ione Or: will necessitate
a tacer ce;ween
^ IWO COCK to aCCK
:eft turn ores on ncaenaa Drive.
7,4
' =RQIEDT DRIVE
1 1
•
y d
2
.'1
O
O
C O
i1o:
LEGEND
N QA = AVERAGE QUEUE
Q Figure C—t
o FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAY QUEUES
cts
_ L
NOT TO SCALE
' 1
1
1
7.11PREcE ...E nNnLYS1. =:=-13..i1 I
-TR A SI:io-- :::9RLIcw :7iEz:u...,,i •
el3acKorouna otus rrolect
:v"LUMI0N USi',3 ';E;EIERMI9E0 j;i,LE ..
�-i aa
71
iacienea Ur i rnlec: ;,r:ue:wu =." Peas '..., _^ar;p
houenent ;:i _
'base : - - °°Cs .
'tease - :9a .
ase . -
71
"352 -
- ase : - . ---- .
•
71
-riticai Mvnt-« ...,, .... .... 71
:3LUfaucn _n i '^ 290 it
`
ielatiue Cat '`t' ,.co v.E2 3.86 u.2) ).?) -
mi
Effective 6r-sec :3 :,1 -
loue lime _-- - 1 :2 - -
tlin/Ped line-sec :J 10 10 i0 - .•4
Prog factor F:r .;C 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,:3 -
AvDelav,uen -sec ;2 •- -
_evei ilc! - _
iv.'a'i lane yen = pm,
Ueh Stopping d 45 95 % 82 aS -
uo Ueh Clear YES 'iES YES YES -
Uhole intersection - Jeighted dv uelav (sec) = 19 Level of Service = :
Critical Movements - weighted nv belay (sec) = 25 level of Service = -
" - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) = 9.85
Predetermined Cycle Length is 9i seconas (All Minimum tines are satisfied) _
4 CRPSSI (Release 11` - :sea on Oelas t':^oloay rer ' .. P�icn:av a:.a;.;t. _.:..,a:
mimi
ri
wit
; t
P ..
:EAMPREHENSIE 9N8LYSIS PROGRAM
A SINGLE :10hRLIZED INTERSECTION
Sackgrouno oius Protect
ALMON USING PREDETERMINED CiCLE TIlES
-.A:drive
-acienoa urine a Uublin 81 P.M Peak ncur ::enario
•
P.% loyement EBT EEL E:i 521 2LEPA 41 '.:EL - 9 2L !,2R
-'ase I - '9 SECS . . . . . . .
.
c - secs . . ,• A . .
:^ase 6 - 'E secs . . . .
- zecs . . .
.'7ase0 - zecs . . . . . , . . .
•;
mvmt-..
'eak i5 Dal -yen ii5 236 187 2?: '10
Eaturation 1800 1710 :700 1E:0
..oat tine -eec 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.:0 IOC
relative Sat 'X' 0.46 9.6G 0.52 1:7
Effective 6r-sec 70 25 19 :7 'E
love line -sec 70 27 19 43
lin/Ped Iime-sec 20 10 10 10 ::
Prog factor PRI 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02
pft
y0elay/yeh -sec E 23 25 13
Level of Service C- C- E-
Pv.10'1 lane yen 5i ;A.R
Veh Stooping 33 iS 88 SI 7:
Oo Ueh Clear ? YES YES YES YES YES
Uhole Intersection - Ueighted Ay Delay (sec) • 13 Level of Service . 9-
Critical Movements - Ueighted Ay Delay (sec) = 18 level of Service =
" Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) = 0.56
Predetermined Cycle Length is 89 seconds (811 Minimum tines are satisfied)
* CRPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual
1
:APSE.
:IIPREHEA.512E InAiSSIS riuts3!
FoR R 5TH6LE 51giRlI21.1 I41E3.55.....3•
••••••
aackgrouna DiU3 Pro,ect
ELUTION 115IS6 PREDETEEIIIHED C72.:!IOU.
'LA:drive
A:swum Br ft 1-00000 ff P.11 Peak tour Scenario I
1
Moment EBT EEL [Si 5.3I S31. SER 7,1 •i7900
Phase - 5! secs . . . . . .
Phase - :9 secs .
Phase - icocs . . . . .
"ase-- :secs
"isse - :secs
chase - 7 secs
. . . . . . . . .
•
Oirst—• •••••
Peak 15 Uol-eon 859 323 437 72
SattratiCI1 - 0190 7.:00 r..1 55:2
Lost tr.e LOG z.ao zoo z.:a
Relative Sat'X' 0.40 0.19 0.44 200
`.1
Effective Or-sec 37 is 49 57
31 01 51 59
Ilinfied fine-sec 10 10 10 '3
frog factor PRE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.23
fh..0elaviven-sec 19 8 10
Level of Service B. B. 3-
fly.'0'/lane yen P. 5 '
Ueh Stnepon 8 71 S1 60
k deb Clear ? YES YES YES YES
Mole Intersection-()Hoisted fly Delay(sec)• 12 Levei of Service A-
Critical Movenents-'duetted An Delay MC) 13 Level of Service• 9-
" " -Intersection Capacity Utilization(IC113• 0.42
fredetvnined Cycle Length is SO secants(All Ilininizt tines are sausfied)
•OFISI(Release -Based on Belay Methodology Per 1905 Highway Casecitv Mantel
Dublin Driveway(s)
..
Dublin Retail Center 41.4
Dublin Blvd and Project Oriveway(I ) Q4 Ck_y'VP,v=o-H
Background Plus Project (Partial access on Hacienda) ,
1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - UNSIGNALI=ED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
VARIABLE RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH UT RT TH LT
VOLUMES (vph) 0 0 0 0 59 240 240 3 932 415 (53 0 .1
LANES ($) 0 3 3 3 1 I 3 1 I 0
GRADE 'Y.) 0 3 0 0
°CE FACTOR 3.00 1 .10 1.10 ,.:0
VOLUMES (ocpn) 3 3 J =S ZS4 =54 J 102S - 7 '68 3
CONTROL TYPE STOP AVERAGE SPEED (DESIRED) 30 MPH
POPULATION (1000'S) 0 AVERAGE SEED (USED) 30 MPH
Critical Potential Percent Impedance Actual
MVMT Vc(vph) Gap Capacity Utilization Factor Capacity
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 153 5.5 934 0.283 0.777 934
LT 452 6.5 521 1.967 1.000 348 ..
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 568 5.0 654 0.404 0.667 654 .4
LEVEL OF SERVICE
MVMT V(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Cr-MVT Cr-SHRD MVT SHRD
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH ..
RT 264 934 670 A
LT 1025 348 -678 F
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 264 654 390 B
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL SERVICE ANALYSIS '/28/94
CONDITION : Dublin Drive (part. access Hacienda) FILE dbdrv2.q -
:NTERSECTICN : 1 JURISDICTN : 3ackgrouna * Proj
N-S STREET : Driveway E-W STREET : Dublin Blvd
COUNT CATE: TIME: PK HR:
CVC:R =0.0000 NODE
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.55
0 0 0 L 0 S : A
NODE NODE S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:T =0.09271 <--1 v I--> 1 CVC:L =0.1455
LEFT 0 ---i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 I--- 0 RIGHT
THRU 153 ---> 1.0 (NO. OF LANES) '.3 <--- 59 THRU
RIGHT 415 -- 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 '.0 H--- 240 LEFT
<--I H--> 1 SPLIT? N
v I
932 D 240
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE
CVC:L =D.3107 SPLIT? N PHASE: 4
MONA
Dublin Retail Center
Dublin eoulevara & Dublin Drive (A)
Backgrouna + Project (Part Access on Nacienaa)
1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET
_==_
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
VARIABLE RT TH LT RT TN LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
VOLUMES (vph) 0 0 0 0 59 96 60 0 699 249 153 0 _
LANES (#) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
GRADE (X) 0 0 0 0
PCE FACTOR 0.00 1.10 1.10 1.10
VOLUMES (pcph) 0 0 0 0 65 106 66 0 769 274 168
CONTROL TYPE STOP AVERAGE SPEED (DESIRED) 30 MPH
POPULATION (1000'S) 0 AVERAGE SPEED (USED) 30 MPH
___=
Critical Potential Percent :rtxaance Actual
MVMT lc(vph) Gap rapacity Utilization Factor Capacity
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 153 5.5 934 0.071 0.958 934
LT 308 6.5 624 1.232 1.000 570
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 402 5.0 793 0.133 0.913 793
LEVEL OF SERVICE
MVMT V(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Cr-MVT Cr-SHRD MVT SHRD -&
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 66 934 868 A
LT 769 570 -199 F
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 106 793 688 A ..%
= =====a=n========s=- ________________====a -a=====__
Dublin Retail Center
Dublin Boulevara ana Project Driveway (B)
BacKgrouna + Project (Part Access on Hacienaa)
1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
VARIABLE RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT iH LT
VOLUMES (vph) 0 0 0 0 59 144 180 0 233 166 153 0
— LANES (#) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
GRADE (X) 0 0 0 0
PCE FACTOR 0.00 1.10 1.10 1.10
VOLUMES (pcpn) 0 0 0 0 65 158 198 0 256 183 168 0
CONTROL TYPE STOP AVERAGE SPEED (DESIRED) 30 MPH
POPULATION (10001S) 0 AVERAGE SPEED (USED) 30 MPH
==ax axaaxxaaxaa=_xa
Critical Potential percent :mbedance Actual
MVMT Vc(vph) Gap Capacity Utilization Factor Cap
acity
pacity
r„ MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 153 5.5 934 0.212 0.848 934
LT 356 6.5 588 0.436 0.641 514
--- MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 319 5.0 868 0.183 0.874 868
xmx a.xaxax---
------xaaxsaxaa— _xx_________•..---_xxxxaxxaaxaaxxaxaxxaaaxx x__
LEVEL OF SERVICE
MVMT V(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Cr-MVT Cr•SHRO MVT SHRD
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 198 934 736 A
— LT 256 514 258 C
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 158 868 710 A
axxaxxasxx- aav
CCTA INTERSECTION LEJEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 7/2S/94
CONDITION : Sackgrouna * project (Dublin Drive A) TILE duccr;ve
INTERSECTION : 3 JURISDICTN : ?FZZ'.i,,_
N-S STREET : Driveway (A) E-W STREET : Dublin Blvd
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:PM PeaK pour
CVC:R =0.0000 NODE
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.57
0 0 0 L 0 S : A
NODE I I ^ NODE S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:T =0.0927I <--I V 1--> I CVC:L =0.0582
LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I--- 0 RIGHT ,..,-
THRU 153 ---> 1.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0 <--- 59 THRU
RIGHT 249 ---I 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 96 LEFT
I <--I " i--> I SPLIT? N
I I I
699 0 60
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE
CVC:L =0.4236 SPLIT? N PHASE: 4
_ Dublin Retail Center
Dublin Blvd and Project Driveway(1) pty rinvewa,•,
Background Plus Project (Full access on Hacienda)
1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET
-. NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
VARIABLE RT TH LT RT TH LT AT TH LT RT TH LT
VOLUMES (vph) 0 0 0 0 59 240 Z40 a 327 227 iS3 0
LANES (1t) 0 0 0 0 I
GRADE (X) 0 I 0
0 0 0 0
.. ACE FACTOR 0.00 1 .i0 ..10 1.10
VOLUMES ipcpn, J a 3 J SS =54 =24 J 3E0 =53 IS8 J
CONTROL TYPE STOP AVERAGE E EED (DESIRED) 0 MPH
POPULATION ;1000'S) 0 AVERAGE _REED (USED) 30 MPH
Critical Potential Percent Impedance Actual
_ MVMT Vc(vph) Gap Capacity Utilization Factor Capacity
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 153 5.5 934 0.283 0.777 934
LT 452 6.5 521 0.690 0.372 366
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
.. WEST 480 5.0 723 0.365 0.701 723
.. LEVEL OF SERVICE
MVMT U(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(peph) Cr-MVT Cr-SHRO MVT SHRD
.. MINOR STREET — SOUTH APPROACH
RT 264 934 670 A
LT 360 366 6 E
m. MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 264 723 459 A
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 7/28/94
.AUDITION Dublin Drive (full access Haclenda) FILE duborive
1.1
INTERSECTION : 1 :URISOICTN : Backgrouno• Proj (M1 "1
N-S STREET : Driveway E-W STREET : Dublin Blvd
COUNT DATE: TINE: PK Na:
CVC:R =0.0000 NODE
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.35
0 0 0 L O S : A .►
NODE I I I " NODE S WARR(U,R): T T
CVC:T =0.09271 <--I v I--> I CVC:L =0.1455
LEFT 0 •--I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1--- 0 RIGHT
0.4
THRU 153•--> 1.0 (NO.OF LANES) 1.0 4--- 59 THRU
RIGHT 327---I 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 240 LEFT
-I " ( I SPLIT? N
I I I V 1
327 0 240
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE ^1
CVC:L =0.1090 SPLIT? N PHASE: 4
.r
00,
r.4
f=1
Dublin Retail Center
Dublin Boulevard d Dublin Drive (A) z
Background + Project (Full Access on Hacienda)
1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - JNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
VARIABLE RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TN LT
VOLUMES (vph) 0 0 0 0 59 96 60 0 245 196 153 0
LANES ($) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
GRADE (X) 0 0 0 0
PCE FACTOR 0.00 1.10 1.10 1.10
VOLUMES (pcph) 0 0 0 0 65 106 66 0 270 216 168 0
CONTROL TYPE STOP AVERAGE SPEED (DESIRED) 30 MPH
POPULATION (1000'S) 0 AVERAGE SPEED (USED) 30 MPH
Critical Potential =ercent impedance ActuaL
MVMT vc(vph) Gap Capacity Utilization Factor Capacity
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 153 5.5 934 0.071 0.958 934
LT 308 6.5 624 0.432 0.644 574
-- MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 349 5.0 841 0.126 0.920 841
��-- ssas=asazsauzz_ sad ==az===t======
szasss:ssss:sass asazzaazssszas szzsssas:zzszs:z
LEVEL OF SERVICE
MVMT V(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Cr-MVT Cr-SHRD MVT SHRD
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 66 934 868 A
LT 270 574 304 B
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 106 841 739 A
a:zza-_ -azsa=zs zss_�_____szsazzzasaazzza szss=»ass
Dublin Retail Center
Dublin Boulevara and Project Driveway (B)
Background + Project (Full Access on Hacienda)
1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
VARIABLE RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT 'H LT
VOLUMES (vph) 0 0 0 0 59 144 180 0 82 131 153 0
LANES (0) 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
GRADE (%) 0 0 0 0
PCE FACTOR 0.00 1.10 1.10 1.10
VOLUMES (pcph) 0 0 0 0 65 158 198 0 90 144 168 0
CONTROL TYPE STOP AVERAGE SPEED (DESIRED) 30 MPH
POPULATION (1000,S) 0 AVERAGE SPEED (USED) 30 MPH
�aaaas=`a xaiaaa==xaaaaa=a==aaia Sl==aaaaa
Critical Potential Percent :impedance Actual
MVMT ic(vph) Gap =aoacity Utilization Factor Capacity
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 153 5.5 934 0.212 0.848 934
LT 356 6.5 588 0.153 0.897 517
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 284 5.0 900 0.176 0.879 900
smss x=as=xaass=aaa aaasassss======saaxssss:ssss=
LEVEL OF SERVICE
MVMT V(pcph) Cr(pcph) Csh(pcph) Cr-MVT Cr-SHRD MVT SHRD
MINOR STREET - SOUTH APPROACH
RT 198 934 736 A
LT 90 517 427 A
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
WEST 158 900 742 A
xxxsx xs-- =a:s==saa as=== ======a=
m.
M.
Appendix D
Ramp Volumes
I I I I I I I ► 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I
o�
60 ZZ CALTRANS - TRAFFIC VOLUMES DIST 04 CNTR STA _ CT INTR 60 MIN USER
.2/92 DETAIL TRAFFIC COUNTS CO ALA DIREC E CT FACT 0.100 BATCH
)7 PRELIMINARY ADT, PEAI< HOUR Y. RTE 380 TYPE RF_____ F'T'ID
C = COMPUTER ESTIMATED COUNT F'OSTMILE-LEG 20.02i - OFF TO HOF'YAR
( ) ® PARTIAL DAY TOTAL
DAILY
DAY 12-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 1.0-11. 1.1.-12 TOTAL
0-92 TUE AM 899 927
PM 920 947 1004 1098 1234 1633 1580 1295 1205 1102 416 197 ( 14,465)
1-92 WED'AM 92 72 57 70 98 241. 736 1447 ±532 1036 956 1046
PM 1032 1017 1099 1117 1285 1284 1198 846 534 490 370 226 17,881
2-92 THU AM 175 81 48 54 97 220 697 1377 1600 1176 963 945
PM 1001 922 1006 1089 1225 1290 1.203 924 581 466 358 263 17,761
3-92 FRI AM 168 120 66 54 96 235 742 1441 1359 999 088 1090
PM 1133 1073 1024 1103 1227 1420 1127 1078 700 533 426 324 18,426
4-92 SAT AM 212 126 114 93 53 129 263 665 757 805 067 920
PM 882 981• 1000 904 922 818 761 627 426 436 403 367 13,61.1
3-92 SUN AM 272 173 145 47 41 65 141. 412 51.3 630 683 750
PM 898 802 717 825 652 648 571 557 343 297 185 139 10,506
5-92 MON AM 74 46 39 40 94 238 749 1433 1460 953 793 090
PM 984 962 945 1138 1147 1220 1143 743 489 419 270 130 16,435
7-92 TUE AM 89 46 52 52 91. 255 7131 1457 1.460 912 820 1029
PM 965 963 1001 1190 1231 1304 1269 803 553 435 371 193 17, 372
3-92 WED AM 111 64 54 51. 09 233 799 1.360 1300 1036C 956C 10460
PM 1032C 1017C 1099C 1117C 1285C 1284C 1198C 046C 534C 490C 370C 226C 17,693
144,150
7-DAY DAILY
TOTAL AVERAGE
iST 7-DAYS 111,992 1.5,999
111,992 15,999 <---- PRELIMINARY-ADT
I I I I I I I I I I I r I I r I 1 I I
i��3ztaz
60 CALTRANS - TRAFFIC VOLUMES DIST 04 CNTR STA CT INTR 60 MIN USER
2/92 DETAIL TRAFFIC COUNTS CO ALA DIREC E CT FACT 0.100 PATCH
7 PRELIMINARY ADT, PEAK HOUR % RTE 580 TYPE RN____,- PTII)
C = COMPUTER ESTIMATED COUNT F'OSTM.ILE-LEG 1.9.741 - ON FR ND HOFYAF
( ) = PARTIAL DAY TOTAL
DAILY
DAY 12-i 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 TOTAL.
8-92 THU AM
PM 310 343 312 365 431 431 348 309 259 21.4 138 77 ( 3,537)
7-92 FRI AM 77 38 31 10 19 42 117 245 209 227 221 274
PM 317 375 401 461 455 429 381 325 280 240 181 115 5,478
3-92 SAT AM 84 6i 48 25 23 32 58 100 1.19 198 259 296
PM 294 276 323 307 316 323 284 218 192 174 128 116 4,254
1-92 SUN AM 109 65 50 37 23 19 36 62 98 170 164 217
PM 281 282 288 252 231 246 275 277 171 i37 79 56 3,625
'.-92 MON AM 46 20 10 11. 18 42 121 225 214 219 218 233
PM 298 319 293 378 424 423 322 243 200 130 92 74 4,573
-92 TUE AM 55 22 21 13 19 40 124 244 208 107 196 264
PM 280 292 313 376 496 411 362 31.3 246 169 125 81. 4,1357
'-92 WED AM 51 26 12 18 18 37 1.30 279 217 197 202 226
PM 273 331 309 374 435 438 348 227 264 203 114 79 4,008
'-92 THU AM 53 22 22 15 20 44 126 297 244 190 193 254
PM 292 316 327 373 463 454 343 262 241. 190 11.0 11.1. 4,962
-92 FRI AM 64 47 38 12 14 43 120 282 210 107 221C 274C
PM 317C 375C 401C 461C 455C 429C 381.1: 3251; 280C 240C 181C 115C 5,477 i
41,571
7-DAY DAILY
TOTAL AVERAGE
1ST 7-DAYS 32,557 4,651
32,557 4,651 <---- FRFI TMTNARY-ADT
\\11)01 iz.
60 CALTRANS — TRAFFIC VOLUMES 07ST 04 CMTR STA __ CT INTR 60 MIN USER
0/92 DETAIL TRAFFIC COUNTS CD ALA DIREC E CT FACT 0.100 6ATC!
3 PRELIMINARY ADT, PEAK HOUR A RTE 590 TYPE RF____ Pilo
C = COMPUTER ESTIMATED COUNT PO;TMILE—LEG 19.051 — EA OFF TO HACIENDA DR
( ) = PARTIAL DAY TOTAL
DAILY
DAY 12-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 3-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 TOTAL
A-92 THU AM 56
PM 249 279 242 240 310 281 224 213 127 100 110 51 ( 2,482
9-92 FRI AM 39 19 9 6 23 88 441 313 493 219 191 194
PM 242 304 257 297 218 174 253 174 98 118 95 88 4,843
0-92 SAT AM 61 38 24 11 13 10 35 66 97 91 92 104
PM 149 147 127 140 176 166 168 106 90 95 92 88 2,194
1-92 SUN AM 72 51 32 10 16 7 16 26 49 66 92 97
PM 100 116 147 125 140 129 156 Lib 110 64 69 32 1,850
2-92 MON AM 23 9 10 11 31 99 448 790 524 216 136 177
PM 234 220 175 228 326 344 226 164 118 109 90 49 4,757
3-92 TUE AM 19 17 11 11 10 120 452 781 552 244 193 209
PM 215 244 228 231 269 374 267 167 135 141 89 68 5,061
.-92 WED AM 32 22 10 18 16 111 468 785 576 232 162 152
PM 225 248 222 224 313 326 282 196 123 135 97 50 5,025
5-92 THU AM 29 12 9 10 20 115 486 833 579 235 147 172
PM 231 266 245 258 240 272 254 188 140 141 110 57 5,049
5-92 FRI AM 27 11 7 9 17 98 477 797 519 204 191C 194C
PM 242C 304C 257C 297C 216C 174C 253C 174C 98C 118C 95C 88C 4,868
36,129
7—DAY DAILY
TOTAL AVERAGE
1ST 7—DAYS 29,779 4,111
23,779 4,111 <---- PRFLIMINARY—ADT
I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1
1 1 I:l 1 l cat ) s - )FF-1 )1_UM I hi I I 11 • }r. :,
1 , F I 1
-/10/'12 of TAIL TRAFFIC COUNTS CO -ALA „IN R
N 1 I:EC f,
E CT FACT 0. 100 9ATI.27:0`• P° L[N1NART ADT, .PEAK MOOR RTE 5H0 TYPE ''N____ PT[D
C - cf1MPUrFR :STI9ATf:0 CI111,iT POSTHTLr-LEG 10.851 - FU Otl FR 59 NAC1
• ( ) = PARTIAL DAT TOTAL
DAILY
')nif n4i -I. 1-7. 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 h-7 7-A J-9 9- 10 10-11 11-12 TOTAL
11-05- )2 TH0 AM
29
PM 1.: 29 • 16 15 7 , 0 0 1 2 0 ( 11 9)
11-06-92 FI:1 AM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 .., . 8 7 14 3
• PM G 12 • . 2 6 5 5 3 2 6 4 1 0 92
11-01-92 SAT Apt ) 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 4 • 9 4 5
PM 4 5 C 9 5 .5. 5- 4 5 2 2 - 2 83
11-01-12 SOH Ai 0 0 0 1 G 1 1 3 3 6 2 6
I'll 7 S 0 S 4 0 3 0 0 2 1 61
11-(11- )i M7NI IA 0 0' ,0 0
1 2 4 3 1 , 6
P'1 ° 2 I 5 12 _ 2 3 4 1 1 3 1 66
11-10-11 TW: AM 1 •
0 • 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 4 1 6
Pit 7 9 6 11 4 4 6 0 2 0 0 67
11-11-32 wrr'0 AM 1 0 ' ) 0 2 0 1 1 1 9 7 7
• PM 4 10 ' y 7 7 6, 1 3 3 1 . 1 . 0 81
11-12-92 T11U AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 8 • 6 5 4
PM 5 12 5 10 6 3 5 0 3 3 0 1 90
' 11-13-92 FRI AM 0 0 0 0 1 2 ' 2 3 9 5 3
PM ) 12 4 20 3 5 3 4 5 1 3 0 76
11-14-92 CAT 4M 0 2 0 1 1 2 1 3 0 5 7 8
PM 'I 5 7 5 12 4 3 1 1 2 0 2 d 0
' 11-15-''' SUN AM 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 4
P;1 9 6 10 7 6 . 0 1 ' 0 2 1 2
63
11-16-•1.7 t14tl AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 4C
PM dC 2C 5C 12C 2C 2C SC 4C 1C 1C OC IC
I
•
)4 7
7-DAY DAILY
TOTAL AVERAGE
1ST 7-0AYS 530 76
530 . 76 <--- P<!l[:LIMINAFY-AOT
1
1 ,
.. . . .. ._ . 7 C, ... .
. c- ... .. ..7.• ::-, _
.: . . .-., . - ,.
--r
-- .--.:- .. ..„ .
•-•.•J ._. -. -- --: --. -
. _ .
_ • .t.- ; 11
• ••-:, , , -t
• .
.,..
•
,--:7. c •:: -: ,7_ C
^..: el-. ,.. --• ,.,-, -, - .....77 ---..- 477 ,7. ..-77 ,:, ...-!: '..-3• .3 - -.. 1
-- C:. •-! •.' - ':-.- <- ;. Z.:, - : ".. -, .... -r-t ::::! --, ::-. ,
..,
. .
-.: -
•, .
-..: .
-7 ,Z -.7
-..:- .7.=
..2.: 17. •7 -=-7: -.7: .7 ..7. .,- ,7 :7 -7 -.7 :7 .- .-- r- •
..z.., . ._
,.•J '. .. '... tsi - -< -1. 71" ,.- 7.- +7 <-7 '.,; --: ::-. ..-i. .
<7. ..7. '7 .7. C ...: -7. ..7. •Z ..'.7 7. st <2 •••-. C_ •7 ....; iligl
. ..
'...7! !:".' -.. r.: •:.: 7. -:, <-:- 7, -...' 7- '.7 '..,-.! .7 "... 7, •_-.
_
-▪ - -
7. z....
..". - -7 •-: .7 -7 -.: _ - .- ,
_ _- •
.. .. .
- .. •.- .. ..,.. :-
.... s'.7: ......- :.". .-; ::', -: •_- ..C; ,... ' ''. ;••• ..r. "•••• .:-. .-: :... ,- ,.. z.- -
!- :: •Z_
..... -r- .",.: *.• 1,- '
C. :7. _•..! -
. I
.- ,17 < :7.• -..' -7 ,- C. C. C •..7 -.:: -- •- - -- -- :•
• '
.7 <-, ..--. •,-: , --. -
....) . ...7.:
. :- .
- OM
-..... _ _ •-• .7 <7. -.7 tr. .:7- .: :,7 t: .7 <7 •:.: <7. <7 fr. -: <: ,-, :-
7 ..., N .... l...., N. ,.. C-.., :-•4 ,.-. ,;,:1 >-
• .- •-.. •V -.^ ..:-. ,...,
.,... -:. :, '< C •••7 ,- ....t., -.- ..7: -- .....7.,. - - :2 .,- ..•.:-
....:
• - . .
,-, 0 - ; •• 4, r- 0
: = f'; Z. •• i _•..; -i a.,.
-.: :: I I. ef: 17 7 < <Z •' '''' C. ,..3 •
.. _
. •:-... !::, ...: ...:. ,-, 7.: C7 - •: CI ::::: CI 7:: f...--; ....I ,-7. ,;1; ,.- ...., _-_-. 1 .
.., ---..
. .... .-
- -: 7::. on ,--: 7' •; -...:
i <7
•
:'I •- 77 •t•-' (7 ;7 ..-7 ..,7 ..,* 4.: .,.,- ..-: .7. ••:, ,7 <7 -7 I 's! -..:
:.; <7 :-.:, "CI ‘: --' ...I '<7 r"-- :'• C, N.. ,n1 0- :, -.,., •--
-,..,- •.-- i- i-J ,.f.: -
,-- •,•:: '7 -
_ ...-:. - -' -, • .! ., 77. 7, = -..-...
• = -.7.. .q...
- •:-.
_ .• -': . • r_r: "L'' C.sz•:.;.. ..._ .....,.. - ‹..-• <7. <2 C. •C 7 C < •,7.• <7. 7 < C: <r. -•-•:. <: .. ,-- LI I.L so"
Z c --. ----- :-!••• ir ,-'! iii C.:: .-, r‘., •G Y:. N. 17.i ...47; C4! I.5-.! .0 •..,2 71 Z •• • n
. L.T.
5•_,) __,--1 u. N' ,... ... 1
-.
."..- ....
. ., :..,
r. -.-. ••,:r.: 1
--!, --, .7...
-, >...
I i_) .cc
I • .
<Z .;'-.G. ;.; . , I LI •
-. ....-:: .1: '':: <F. <Z. < '7 < <i <7 -,1: < <21 <7. C < "-:
-.• !. 7.1 .. ''' ',": C'. N, a.. . 7 .! 0 !7•7 C, c- Le)i N. C,". 7- 7.4 ....
._ ..... :-... C.! :..• •.....
. - `-';
_ „....:.
_.:
. ‘r. •
„:.......„ .., , .
,
•
z „ 1 , . . .
<7 <7 <17 c ,Z; <7 c., 4: CI <7. ••<= <T. C ‘7.: c <7 f......
- ^ ".. r. r-, r.-,- C.-, •;:"; in; L;-; C4' !7•• r..... C... CO •••,, •.41 ^ ' .•
C^' ,-.. <i'. ,. C!) z7.%i C• ,-I 4,. C... ,
•
..
. : ; •-t . .
"I " i ri
.
- . ,
. • ,
, , • ,.r.::- -r ..., i • ; .
• ; . . •'Z 7.7 Z ZZ! ZZ! ZZI ZE: ZZI ZZ
- < - <7 . < -! -.7 -! C 2-. C ...• C Cul; <Z. - C .^- -•
1 i
:::- . --, ,-; i- , 7' ! Z : '•! = i - '
71 ,
--. • .±.. i: (7 - . . -
--
.._ . .
. = .
. i7.77 U. ;74 1 :114 I 1 i-- • 3 i- . !..• ! ! '
•
• ,7.1' C.1 CI !I; Ili r.1 C.I Cl C.1 CI ! !7•1 , i .
••••• ,... !7••• .. • 7:- ' Os
' I .
I
in ..47 0. . -:.,-, I a- ! 4:-..-• I -4 F..-..! i ,-;
-, En r=e ....4 . • ,..! . •.-! I ••-! I -
-
i , 5 • 7
. i ! 1 i
.,
,
I• ,., I e-i
I . I : •
1
f
in
fl
/01
I 1
•
,..„
". C '''' -• • ;%
:-.
•
C,•• I
_ ,...
. ,
'. .
'
.. ....
p.m 5. --,
_ -
, . .. _ . . ..
- ,
..--. ..7.... :.: -
-.1.
:- c...1 1 •
• .7
I
." I •
r V r
i .
• r
•
' ,..! .=... L.,..
• • : . I i
I i
pg.le 1 .•
• I
' .
I I
• i cc cc er ..r <7 <2 C ;7 cc cc ..7 C. •'... T..'
• !
,-.: 77; ..-`, ,.. ..:•:' <.!.. 1,7, -_ .:. 7 7 - r n
, t=.
•
, "...i . :. .-" F-. 74 N r•ii :: .., .....' - -... ,, ,...... -. -; ,•. 4`..i . • '
...: ...,
. . 1 •I : .
7 I
•
....4
. .
cc cc cc cc 'Ir. 'T '.7: C <7. C-.
, •-. ,. V; ., 0••• Y N. N. 7 •"' 7:7 :7 '. '7. 7.; C.7 r r, -4..
. -... - N. I:, "• .--: c'• .: ,.s. :: z.. --: ". .,-. -i .- r••••• 7,. ,) kr; •7 •
•
--; .
•
•
<17 cc cc cc •7. •= cc cc
i.c%
I i
-, -1 r- L-.: 77 ". - .. •7 :!-: ;:: :,. -,.. '-• *, n .
i.--:, ...<2. ‘T 'if; CI -7 7'.. •: 7. : .7:: <7 r; .::: C0 ..:: y •
":-
,
...1
< cc C. C "7. 7: C •I •:7: C cc cc '_' ::..' ••• "..:. 0, ..,-. C.0 N C 1-: -.- ::•• ...- •,.. .1c, -..:, y r-.. :•• ,-.1'
-. :70 r•-. %.- - -7' -: -:C 71 :"": :::.'; ,,"" 7.' .7 '7.
-' 77 7. .•7. -..: --, :• 7
- :. ..:*t. 7, :7T .5 ,..• :: 1 ': ,- ...... . . _
n . •
•• __, _. .. .
i•_: __ .7
i ..LI ..- ..z..I. , <7 <C.; 7. "... - - •I.. 7 -,; -:.... 7:.• .:... y. %7..., 2L' I- C ,<
- :-
I<T :.=. ' •
. , i
.7; .
..-
Lia ,
rl
••• ••7 <7, „. ...- :- .- '7 7 C C-, _ ••••• ......‘. ';:.
•% tr. 0 7... r•••• . .• • ..7•. : .7: -,
- :r. -.. ,- 7• Y ..• ::: ,1 ....- 7 -
.7••• -2 •..: <7 N .7 , 7. (...`
I •,-; :J.;
• ..
• '7 e: 0 -
4...11
..' . -.' '... ‹: cc `7:. ...r. ••: ': ‘7. .: :: .: '.:. <I ,:: ".7.<i --: :'..; ;, _ _ _1' :CI, •".; ,... .7,1 in CC, 0: V; "- ... ".., ..7, C, .7, Y 0. :.3 ,1" 77- >- ...J 0;
•,
,-. if; 43 F'.. 01' n ..-; v C. -3 if; cr ,..-: T!. :•: ‘,7 •r... s cc
ki 7 LL ,-, - ... ,-,C. -. .•-• . .-. .... ,
,,,
,-,
/'s--::-.• C3 ' . ;
' CC,
...I / ! -- '-' • a: .
•
, ;.r., .7"' ,"'; Cr. Y• ,,., N .,-, .".: ;f., Y :- : 0, .....'" ",-, C.: C0 al ,
.,.
<';' '47., •'-' It- :::::; :77 .7i I.:7 '7.7 :7 ,-4 -.... !7I1 ..7 4,2 ‘.7, ,-.! :r. .
'It, ..., '
<T. !
..., . I
.., •t: <7, <T. <17 <T." <7. 11" C" . .--: <7: L:. <1"
p..
'-.• --." . C.-. 0 ,-, zr rs. -,, ..• ,- :.- i ,.. ,,c, e- :.).. •,-: ,..,
, . e•-• __
..:: 1--; r.: -.::- 2.., .
,-..i LI= -
C2 ., N' . ..: :7.2 e.
N c7.• . , ,....
= .7.-.. .
' Z •. . -
-
--.1- _
7-z• rsi -
, ..
-.- -
.- •,'Z' cc cc. cc cc --. C cc < C .: 1.; -
_ ..-.;
PEI
Z < n Z if), r's• Y or. ;7,1 0 •,* ... c... C, CC., ir..k r.,7 r., .c.- IT: Z
LI 7.3 i. 17, M". C,1 03 .0 0 ..3 V N .T. .7.J 1-') r.1 is... v• :72. Z r_r"
<-. 2- NI N N. N N. 7, n - ;--
t
;
. „
-...:
.. :-.
- •
I •...: -
••-: C <17 o'7 < <1 ‹: C 2 1:. C -7. < ...r• e. <7. e. ui
N. i...3 N <-1" C' -7; <7 CO 177 N.; ;•., ',7.; 47 22. I.L.
0 N. IJ1I , ..; ; ' rr!: ^- 7.0 r-. ,:::4 L..
; <r. = -. -.1- N, Z...• NI • 7, 7... N. •:: •:..-- e.
• .
I I-
• LI l-. i-
I ;
I I
cc cc. cc cc cc <17 •C cc cc'
•-_,c r'7 ,i N- 0 ..7, 0 int N. 0 r... C. es O. V.o. .4.1 a, 03 C,2 -.;
.....
0. •:.• is. •.-7...-! -0 ..7 -.0 1. .--.1 C.,•• N. N. 0.4 .
. .
-. , N. ,....2 .." Ca '7 .....% N. -0 1 N.
-
I
I . .
•
, I
• . I I
zz zr zm zz tr.: zz r. z :t :s.-. z- e c- e •:.,.. < o.. e z- c ,-. : ,:-. a... <2 r= <2 a. .c ,-.,_; ...
O.%
. I
I !
•7.: .7 • 6.,
. -,. •-7 •.••=. :7 =l•
"C. .... ....
. --.
,.
r t,. .....% Li•3 . :3 tr•••• ; tit
N N ! N 0.1
L.1‘ C' 0, r..... ! ,-:- e' o- c., .....
.....
n. o•,--! i kl ....,: • N. ,..., c..,. ; ..9. I ,-, ?..:.; , ....., I
.-.
.-.1 'L•! t.' = I r ! I !
77 C%i Cri , C".. ....... r ....,
0 • 0 I •-•7-, 1 0 0 I 0.
' 1'4.•,: ii, -.-i
.,.; .,4 tr, si . ,, I .71 ,i. .
•
I
0. I • I i
1.....1
•
•
•
TRF160 CALTRANS - TRAFFIC VOLUMES DIST 04 CNTR STA ___ CT INTR 60 MIN USER
01/28/93 DETAIL TRAFFIC COUNTS CO ALA DIREC E CT FACT 0.100 BATCH
22:13 PRELIMINARY ADT, PEAK HOUR Y. RTE 500 TYPE RN_--- PTID
C m COMPUTER ESTIMATED COUNT POSTMILE-LEG 17.940 - ED ON FR SB TASSA
( ) - PARTIAL DAY TOTAL
DAILY
DATE DAY 12-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 TOTAL
01-19-93 TUE AM 35
PM 56 48 61 161 148 89 46 42 30 27 32 21 ( 796)
01-20-93 WED AM 11 1 3 4 4 13 27 103 86 65 42 40
PM 56 56 67 121 138 77 45 26 16 24 31 24 1,088
01-21-93 THU AM 9 1 0 6 4 8 25 96 SB 48 42 34
PM 52 56 68 132 135 68 52 44 29 36 32 34 1,099
01-22-93 FRI AM 9 4 0 2 1 10 40 86 82 50 30 46
PM 43 72 73 144 138 98 47 48 31 14 32 32 1,148
01-23-93 SAT AM 27 8 3 2 5 2 20 26 41 53 54 55
PM 54 57 75 80 49 59 44 34 21 21. 20 43 061
01-24-93 SUN AM 17 10 5 4 2 6 13 25 22 34 48 62
PM 45 63 79 78 63 44 35 33 14 17 20 20 759
01-25-93 MON AM 7 3 3 5 3 15 35 06 94 46 42 45
PM 56 73 65 124 155 82 47 37 1.S 17 20 21 1,096
01-26-93 TUE AM 8 2 2 6 3 11. 31. 99 101 48 46 44
PM 39 69 73 133 160 93 51 30 32 27 26 22 1,17
01-27-93 WED AM 10 1 2 3 2 9 20 93 00 56 42C 48C
PM 56C 56C 67C 121C 138C 77C 45C 26C 16C 24C 31C 24C 1,055 1
9,074
7-DAY DAILY
TOTAL AVERAGE
1ST 7-DAYS 7,223 1,032
23 1 1 )32 --- F6•ELIMTNAgY-Anr } _i _J _J .L.7
n
n .
...^.!
' ••• :". s:',
Z.:
. C - ...
- " 71 • . . - .
r 1 • •
; N. 4.: •_. ...: .., N.: -
... • ••. ,.. .....4
v.:.
.....
: t) •
•
L. 7% ,7" N.; 7,-. in 0 73 - :-., L7; <7' -, 0 •,-- ,-.,:, 0 •7' ..:• 73
..7. ,--, ,:,.-; , 0 •:•-• ;'.:-. 0 .,7. L-.• :::: a 3:.. C.-- 0 ...74 0 7: 0 L.--
:.--3 ,. 7 .- z.- ,• 7.; •7--; . 7 : :"., , .7 ,
_ •-• ,.,
. :•-:
mi.
•
••.,
..-
.7 7, V-, -.7: -.7 .."." 7 •: .'74, , CC" , if. V '• ...- •37 -.•
- 7 c•-• .,•:, ..,-• 7 , -.::. 7.• -.-, ": -4%; N. 74 .7 7:, 7. -'
,-• . .•-• ,7',.. (-1 i:',-; 1-1 '''.: ;71 .r.I ,7i 7, :.7: 7. 7 •••-. r.:i .--,
..
- ..
pmm ,
0 :7.- ---: N .,-.4; 7 c- , - , "7 in 73 -".• 7 7 r..1 N
, 7'..: f•-::. N r.4-• if2 (:(:; rs. •.' ..':( 7'. 0 :7 4.::. .:, ...• ::. f...N 71 •Ni !NI ::',4 ....• , :-..1 •,., •,-'' C".3 7! .7:i 7 :-. ::,-,• ,N
'..-^•
eomi,
• •• ..
C... 7 •- 7 CO 7 -", - •:.• N. !..-• - 0 ". •.:3 N. ..--,
- : .•:..
• :: -: c ::-; ::‘. i.-. - :::, c •:-. •:-; ...--; c ....: -.- •:--. c ::-.,
Pm, =
= .
.. - -'7 <7 •::: 7. <7 <T. ,7 <7 <7 :::: '7 5 5 (r. 5 5 :..! 5-, .:- ,..i -
" ;:r.: ,-- ,-...: r, -, 7.7 ---• 4.7: 0 - .:'• J": , " •N: .r. :, C. , •_j "3.7: 0
_ .
a; ... ....1" ., 'D: 7.7 --, r:::: ,.4 ,7 :7. ':,7.; -,!. AT :''..: ...-.., ',, ,, C r, ;-• C ".'•
- 3.:.• 'a •
7' ::-.: %.:- ,r i.: c'i ,-; ....n '-., ...% ,..i.' 71 L7: 7.: '.7 77.• r 7 : • !C. :.= .
••
,.•J
N. , ..--. _3.! -T .:.7 ‘- .- - -•:. -- ;:' .7
(
( ,. --. .r. •:., --, .., ,..1 0 ;S.': CO rr yr (7' .'•i -r (:••,i (:',. 1-4
'-(1, e:.' '......: '.0 •-i CI c- r•.; %.- c...i n r...; n. 1--.: n ci -o
cri
L0 '
, •
-.-
...
I I .-. .... .....
• : ,....:
::.; Ts. .1- tf.I ‘o --; :;-; ir; C.: re: In 0,, tr:: C-4 N. 7 .7-, • <I- < c:
.....
•
-•-• •-• ,
• . .
r ,,... ,:.,...
w .7
• ,' C' ?: ..tr <7 < <r er <1- <7 c e: ‹r e: ....- <T. L) . ;
-.:, c7- C., r.', :'.4 ,•-•:;- C"i cr n n n 7:- --,. 7:7. ..- ,7:77.7. ,:, .7-7.-1
i -..-"r :7; .7-.; ,-; •,-, 0 ,-, 7 N -..1 r< N , 47" , r.?• , 7. c
..-.
• 0.4
e
r..,
7 73 -,-•• C: N N. ;.'..... ir• 7'-4 0 c.`C L".• 0'. tr:. r..... '7, r. 0
..-x - N :r< C.< ,:4 •7: , , , N , .-• "N: , :-.4 , Lij LC -
•
t_ ..,.., C 7. Z.' ',7: --N. 7 •T n r. n n so c 7> = ',-;
- •
. .
rfl --1 a
:q i:- )..c - C C <r C.. C. <7 C <7 <.:• C. C C C <: C cy: (.3 !-- o w
P.,
.,. ,-1 I f-. ..0 ,ti, in. C., C.% a• Fs, 0 In: 7 N.: :,--: r-, r. va Z La '
LI = •:.,j ' ,• N 7) Lr:,' 7.! 0 '..", , -,. .•-• -,-.• - a , N 7-1 LC
, 4, •=3. C.... ;NI a! 7 !,-3 V• er c .r• c-1 -4- ir... c•.; z ).-
•(-..
I 1 . •
0=4
!... ... rsi LL -0 N C7:• 7, 0' :-.7: 7! !7-1 , ;3".• ,0! 7: 01 ::'7. 0 bi 0 Li. i
..L r- . L.-. se; !.-.1 C.+; .1- C.,. n ;7.0 ,..; C:', ...-; i.",:.i ..-: V I ... ,-.t C•i C.,: L. ,
7' 7; :7-•i 7 7. < I
,••7•..e . ,
I I I • . I
I •-•
. i
I I
<t• C. <r <T. C. <T. C: .17 C' <r <3.7 I C ‹ C. C C L.)
ommo
L- .. ,4 ^ -,t. (7,'.. -r! (7; C.1: iri 4:: N. rs.I Tr CI I 7-• .0! ,-: l' ...., r, r
i- C.,:. !ft- .• I N 1 7 0,: 0 V; N. in r'i in I (7) ..-(i N. ,-d cr, r..., c:-., r..., . i
....i =.Z r..i i . er `.1* •;--i •q-I :.7.! 44.I <1-; 1-i 1r' ,.7 7. i
<37 0 0 ,•-• • . !
I . !
! • i
I
•
I ;
• . .
•
• Z Z. Z Z' C.,-- 1.7, Z ".7: Z Z Z. Z 7:I Z
, •"- C- ^ , •..1.- 0- C 0-I <Z 0- C C-I
...
-I
- I •
>. •. -: ,..• I- -4- 71: Li = - •...,•-•
._.
•
, 4- LL Ll F.;::: I -..2 •- 3. I.- 1 L_ ' :
. .
I ,
-' c-.1 r-.1 c..,, .7.1 I N r-.1 r•-.1 c‘l N
o, o. ,:••• 1 o- r.:7••
...
0 N. • i : I i 1 I • 1 I 1 .
• •
in 0 N I ' In -0 N. 0 • 0, 0 ...-1 ri . el •
••-.1 .73 7 I.LU i ! .7 , , •••• I , -.
.-: N N I N I
..j N. -- , : • I ! i 1 • : 1 I I •
- .... ,..... •C ...... 0 0 0 1-Li . : .11 0 C."- 1 0
, •,1 ...i ....
0 •
J
-4-i . .1.
. ,
. • I
omm
I
-
•
Owl
7
r,
r.
_J Z ,C. M I.7 .. - .r -
1.. 1••.
01 .a, 1- I, L• ... . -. P ' ._
._. C. .'L C 6- rl .• ., t t.. f..
I- r
V
C Z 1
I; _ .. ., t .il .7 C - •C ^I •-, , J i• .1 1.../r l..
•. L•. r. ,. 1- t _ r- _
r, 3 r. a f .t .r .t -1
f.
I- 4..1 r- ... r. -+ a _ cr. ti' V �-
4.
- I . r•J .. .. .r. -. .~-. rl .-. -- rJ .t rn r.l C
` a t a . r- .. .t -. 1•
1 . Y
1.4 1...) c'
Q
_, 11
I .. a .. r ... .1 .. r J a ti 4 .. a .. .n .. 1....
i
a 1 . rJ ... a, ...• r+
i i L.. - � u. rn . r-, r- r
I MI6
r- I
V.
v
12
.• .- X' f- 1> •t - -1 .r, n r• .- r\: a
t u
. .... Y ^ rJ 0.. N C-- r, r. r„ _ r.J r- rJ rJ Y
... .-
•r i
.t .
t- .., V - .0 r r
L= I rs. 1C .f rs. Ifl a a r CC .-. lr. r. .,f el ,t ri
, .1. •" .r .t .l _ a a
7 r C.-
C 1-- .t -t
U ft p 1 [, i
V .. rJ 1'.) .L r. r. a C, r, 1- r- r: CI `t a
1 1.s a l+l a r N C r l .r, n L7 .T a .-: .. r•. r.
..' rc = a c t^ L O c . , T r r .t .t .. r
-IO Y
a
? I... -..1 I- .4 f;
I
C .+ r- 111.1 rl .r n r
L H a ,--. .t .t H
I- v. J... N 11r.�
Cr v^ W 4I
•. n C
V
• H u` N f- d .•. w O• ...I z. T O .0 •C O• -. n a r
1 Y J I' ..1 .. 1^ :A r 0 r1 sr r.: ►. -. r, .. rJ . r.
I a Er ► a v a t n a a a a
L C -, .y
MINI
• ••••• r- i I1 I.-
rs
.t -1= O d
r- 'T J 1 r n L^ rl .- rJ T. s N s r- r. a
sr, a. •r. O N .0 rJ T N S r. .Q
.•J H V; I. II N 1 .l rl J t t a
a u.. 1 I•.
MN
a s .r i z a .i a = a .c a C.. a
tr 2 rc a 7.'-' 1- u 0.
]'-';-
rJ rJN rJ r.l nJ rJ N r.
I.1 1' rT p• _
v a r,
• O 1 1 1 f t I 1 1 1
N.-. Is C r rJ IA
...I. .r U... O 0 C .•. .. d
:. .�. \ 1-- 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I
r mg
c CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD
•- .,
7 L.' G >- J T L.
c C ti C
. . tr 1. I- P.. -t r c r- C.
5- r
CC v
CI
^ I T ti .ti P.- r l Y. .- _ l.- r •Cj ... .7' r�
• r I t� .r a .,. .. .T C. .�-. r- .r .n d .r es
I:. r 1a' ry •A
b▪- L., �. f'7 r^ I:l C M T M n _ I..) I.I
IL 1 r r` .T CD r- •-_J f- r- '1.. 1.71 I 7. .- CD r` .77 r I-. N. C
..- I-
v u
C ...1 .0 r... M C In ..• rr r) .1, r^ .:l C l f I-I
1.... I 1 r C. N to .r r ....1 1. r •. .; .1 .r r. r.1
r.
r .f rJ rl r,1
I I - •U _ nJ v• p r +• _ _ U Li
I 1 r i I d N. N. L.,. !I .f
j 1
J
1
ll I,
I- a, f f� U. r. r- f .T 1.- l S, S. J, .,J L' ^ 1 N. •l 1
I
0 N. LJ
1...)
I
•f c C L.
J
77 1 M _ N ',.. .. ., r'. P.' r r, Pr (.1
� • r-• I.- I:, f� .0N er. t N. v, .- CC �^ T �., .t N. r r 1 ,r) ' n
r
u 7- i C: I- C
I CI .
1 LW. ,r ti U •O r` nJ .f ..P .a . IC U �, \.'
In y• Q .j .C. v M .r us N L1 rl A
'..� J ...a _ in - C
-.
i i
;t N
es
r r rV r N. 7r• '+ . C U r,LI O , rI r: -I .r1 w ,r
J
> I.. 4-1 N. al al_ O
_ t
I
C. 1..• is f! `•1 ., .f .-. -. nI ^ . .r rJ 1) 1,-. --. Is C J N
l'. I- t• >
N
n 6. a C)
Is Y t 'N ; _ 1-3
.._ > l J I r1 .`. 'Cl In T N .. rn .1 e .••1 nJ T.J r •-• C7 .n
at IL Is Q .-. ..... '. 11 .r .. Ir .... f '. r , PIS .} r• .r 1-
f..• :.0 PC ' •a J fir. y- ir. `, ^ ;
t, I- 7 n. I-
►, i 4
•i J 7 C c
N u.+
I N
♦•- _tr J — r J r C O c,
II !I r, 1+ • ....... .-. d A V' ,} a'. C N, -} I-
c U.:4' 4.4
.. In ..7 ,n .+ r- ^.J ti
ism L. C) 1- .. S.
i
v _ _ 3' - - _ _ _
G. C _ c 1L 1 L. : C.. N. ... ar a. C •t ').
•' � G •i A
... T .-• 5
. r
0.. I... V`I VI - l: _ CC -1 0
I. 7., I- J.. I, VI
amp
1 N r I Cmr.I rII
N N
13 rw rw 1 Tl C,
I I
I
n
ri .A C. I ,� I I 1 1
-, •a .a l,1 •-• - st I r: •} Y,
e•I Y_ r 1•• CT 1,-... 1 " rJ f•J nP./ N rl '1
\ .-• y eS I I 1 I I I I 1
�tt •.• N -O O- r, O 0 0. 0
.1 .a .y .a •+ H
a
,
C C7 r r_77 r 1---- r-- c I-77- r-_-- C77 r-- r-7 r-- (------ 1"--- Fr- r 17-
10,) ,,, iii 1 i•,,,,, ;•z-:,.2•c•t
•
I : ):-..(,:.'r.r 1-.1
.T.-..o.;.eri..v "viol siloizri,i AVIV t.
AlTvii ,L.V(.1-/ :A.“ kriDT-3Non
1.J. : ••.1.
.. .
id :::10:t 1 :::1111 :in•I 1 Ifik).1(1- ,1j .11114 !:..,I i Inty) :i I: TAVIII. :V.. r 16f: I If);- kiz;i. ...q,;-. kp.,.; 1.:!;,::::: 1..,,,,.;1 V 1:01: V g 9 I: V i.1
I .,.;.".;-,:.1 V,:i.: kicq': kr)0 i.... lk,-1.::; 1,1,1 V9 V6 Virje.: 141J Nns z...6-••,..le.-•-•ot
• .... 1 . 1 ,...;.::::-. km...--; ki.....:!--; y t 0 I.:If:7;9 1.-)02 H.:I
k.P-; 1;..',', !J'.,' .1., 13
I. 1.,,`17. .,,I..c v,;,.: 1.1 h•9 k,:: ) 1.1 ft::I V 0 I I 1.1:2.:.•-',. VC/. k)06 !4,1
1.....,1! ':, . '.". I VZ. Vi',r v67: I,R.' IJI
......___
. .,,, :;• 1 s.:.t:!: 1.4;::,.I v.• ,;1 v:t;-,I. ,...r,,,,..,, Qt.f:1 1.I/c;1 t.m.::t 10/6 VII f VE:Z. '.1.1
V,c;I V%.•: I '•;:::.I VIY! VJ.:.I V6 V Pi!: 1,1'. 111-1.1. ;7.6--F.T,-()r
V()E: V IC V/2 C. v,;(7 V(V 9i:S; VO0 1;4!)0 I VC 1:I. V c..;Et Von Is-,'.?"8
V t-li ";'Z.f., V 1,1':': V,..,! I: VI:ti.r '...'1::9 V()?.. VI V;.r.1 V1T.:T V E) V9Z; WV 1/311 'if,6--I i.....-()T
:,-.: 1 1...-1 0 II ';4.:,'f4 1.'I Z.1, 3.1!!I I V.'':.I ',IT f; kr,,,, V 1.0 I V r r.;I VC()I 1-151/.. ' ICI I.!,1 1
V.,1,..: I,'t•1i'; 1:.'::::: ',.I I I V!)/.I k,',f.9 vo,t--; VII.I II.: ';',..; VE:;'..! II'.' VII. 6-(Yi::-()I
1 V9E: V';i': VI;: kn:c 1:0 Cc; 0;2.a. 1.1::.:1 I Vi,0 I V WI I..W 9 V I.::9 1/.1
V 9 t v .tVt)1:i V,,.... VE:I_I V('L. VI/''. 1,-.1:,'.".I V. V.r..: YE UT WV WOW if:f.)-6 T-.0'1
'(I 111:;I:1,.I :AO I I. :',',):I I t. N(1.:1 71-1M-)-11:Vii.,' I ON S 1141103 '.:1 1::1.:11;03 I < <
1'.. !I':I .'1 . 11 ii. -ol. (ii .,:. . ;• C .." ,:,,...;., :, 1I i*--r I--,'I A.VII :71 1. (I
.'..I i ViI
thz q LI I ),11.; :'I•I in 1 del o: 1 rid 1.1.1,I 0;3'4 ir I d :; ,11101-1 i t-vAd (am I.11 V .V-11.11 HON
II 71 l.:1 III t; P) OD S 1,pi pi:i) :111.1..IVNI ..1,1,jr011 if.'.6/I.I/ I
0 '.0•:";1 9..11 A111,1...11.1 '-'I...: ;!'l I il I V 0 0311.1 '.'.11,41-11.111 aIJJVH.l. - f:.,i,R4.4 I,-1....03 0..;;I 1011
I
. .
t llt) A IIII14t114 ) .....1: `` I i:`t•C' 1:1.
()....';'. t is.I,:::.' 1.1. .1.r,I.
. .
/
--- - -
t.•111.1 ..II 1 1 71-1111 I V," , 11.:0 ::•.1.01-103 DJ :I.:.1Vd I. •
t7If)1: t'-` ',.Y 1 !Pt. t./)'..:• kJ : 1410 trII 9 ''I!:: 1..,qi'; 1,16 t.• V;.;lis 141
1.,"1,...; k:I 1' I,'%.!:: t:,•:' .'I r 1;1.r r t..,,..7 ‘,..r V f.) Vi... 14') 011S Z..:6-- : -0 f
• •,.... I
il . .,,r i••. lI,'•' 1:1'..;'1 1 .:, V 1:-,'
VI: t.:1„. t.:.i..7 VZ. tp; V 0 WV I V S 7,6.-17 :
. .. . . .... .. . ....______. ._.___
,"•1:
''I.;I I Vf.:1.'.1 '.:''`;'.f, ';.'I;:71 ',;'Z II V/.0 T 14,1
c t ';':::t I: , 1.1 I I I tif, 4,.: 1:4 voT Plk,' :I d...I i'''...%-1;i:-4)r
V..,I I '•-"*.I 1 'Mt': P'-:()I: V6';t !-II
: I V. ,.•
t..:: V,(. I; ? ,:'t WV III II. 1."..!-- :1'.;.-()1
I.1 ko"...I t.',.: : 0..,..,..17 Vt:i.)1: 17'.)...)I .';• .' V S';.; V i IT V I 1: 14 T ,1
'.'' 1 1 V I'''. i.'I f.':, k••,'!71 I t:111:t 1t.'t."... V IY k".'.? •,;•t., V i'2 WV fr.:16
... . _
' ......:,:t' I: t,••-.4
1,14.1 ..—.E;) i../:.!., 1-...'.:•,) V e.'.( V/.I. ',...!'.7, f VO I:1: I.//I
V1,':)r V ,:7 f' I:,' ,••!.:: h'j"`).•I. ''c::" i,,: .)t VC: e;7: 1,1a7 IP' if.I.I. 1::tf.-()1',-
y!,; 1,1 C., t:".:.:::: vs..;', V 1 f: ', t7 V .)I '...'1‘./. I. vo„:-) vc: k:,1:C)1: V e•',.7.:I 1.1t1
''().',)I ',.''.:,' k:'1:::.'.7 I ';'4 n • •'......,, V()9 I V'1 F.• yr., VI VIE: V Z. VIF:: WV NOW if 6--6 I-0 I
NT I .....;1•11.1. 1!)..1 '.:Ii01J-11.tmy 11-.)0 !::101111::1 :11. Ilk:Id!. :
. : •
11(11 , i II It OP ..,1 ,... .• I: . ',' !.; '", I/ I : l: ,:. ' I I J.:T. A v 0
ill/.11..P.)11 tll 1.It1 :111 ') 11 1.1 .1.1),I. , :. .I.1.11 :: .4111111 IV'Id ill-It;.' I I'l V A 11111•JOW - - Ors; /0 IV ITI;) '':':.1.1.'.(III"..1 ;:IT..:I.IVI.I.I. A-1811(III
:1- '11 I 1111.11(tt..1 "I—, /Ili/ I I f) I 11 il "...VIII II::)."t ....II:I tIV,.I I • f31.4'...421.1.1k),:1 ()T.I"III'
•
r---.. L_ t_—__: C.... I . 1 t I . (---.7 F__- c ( ( . ---. I . L . t __ ( I : I
7
C ..
:L ,..) O T J ,r .-. r .1 .. _ .-. N C..1,-. _ J .1r' re- J ^• - .1 IN:
✓1 a 1•- .. r: Is .-. - r-
•
G: C. -
al e. b. r J r .-. rn -.. ..+ .• -I
= rl a
1.
v
1
- Z 4. V V_
was 17 -• .-I In .:, r'1 L -J r_ 1 n 1 - N ..l r n. .1 C fv
(7: 1 rl r .. r J r r rJ r
-r C. or
.:t
r
^' h
I- V 1- Cl Cl .. :t: p .- -r nr n U t....:
... .>~ .. I -. .. .. .-. .. -. ... .-.
CD
U u
U V
On - C' P. a .,, r- a r1 r- ., e .f do- .f
.r _ In I•• .1 .r ti to- r: I I tr. rr .J II_
I .. .-I ..... r l r
1 I I .. .1 - ... _ .- .. _ -_ _ 1 } AM
J ..... r1. J Ir 7 r- -^ I-J .1 r r - .7 r
1 -1' Jr. .r ^. _, t r-1 r -^ r r '4 t, a
•- .. r: :J •J ... .. .. r. ..
U. I- ..- .i
O fY
l_LI CZ
♦` IC r 1 r 1 ^ ^ nl 4 M: r 1 .0 r^. r- .I ,r, r.l G
a el. C I'
•t u, r J ..: f- rJ 1-1 rt .. R r'.
In r rl J .f S •1, .f -1 as, 1 r. `/ r, 2
> J r-
I r: .mil r CZ: •-. d r .. .-. C f 1
7
.... 1..:: LI
t: r ..1 r .. r r i ., .. r .�
O 4 1
n e a : to c -J r.
• l- a tr -; to... L' 1_
...... rJ a.. ti .-I nJ re
... C7 I-. h r r J .- .-. -. r 1 r: ,,1 .. I-Ott
L 6- In
l•_ H V1 T r,
- L. - a
-r .r C. C
L tJ
1-- LL lL rJ .- ,.-• rJ O r e In - _ rJ t - .f J.l` r 'G nI O r"'
1. an- 1. J 1 -. ors -� :en .. .. ni J r rr
One
er J a L•
r- I.- •r V C. n: r, n1 •n an .t Ir- .. -0 .r n ti .. •-• d O r'1
r•- -1 J 1 :.1 t'rl .f T .-. Pr. .-. .f ... r.! ... Jr .-• J n: .f rot
I.r t I I II r J r .- r J -1 N r l .•.
a s a s a Z. •S CL Q G C Q. cf Q. .1 C. r_ C. a CI-
,- f--r17 CI t:, C = 1,-, 1,.
._ 7 tt ••• s a
N N rl n1 rJ n: N
T re. de. 1
C \ 1 1 I I I I 1 1 •I 1
.; rJ . r ti :C ^, .1 l.,
nJ rl rJ N I,'L •- 1 I t 1 r11 I t I t I r
rr v.. r a n O 0 O O O .O.I O O Cs
7
1 1 1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l ) ) ) ) ) 1
TRF160 CALTRANS - TRAFFIC VOLUMES DIST 04 CNTR STA CT INTR 60 MIN USER
01/28/93 DETAIL TRAFFIC COUNTS CO ALA DIREC W CT FACT 0.100 BATCH
22:13 PRELIMINARY ADT, PEAK HOUR X RTE 500 TYPE RN__-.- PTID
C = COMPUTER ESTIMATED COUNT POSTMILE-LEG 10.941 -- WD ON FR HAIECEND
< ) m PARTIAL DAY TOTAL
DATE DAY 12-1 1-22-3 3-4 4-5 DAILY
5-6 6-7 7-0 II-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 TOTAL
01-19-93 TUE AM
2
PM 2 5 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 18)
01-20-93 WED All 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 1 4
PH 3 3 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
01-21-93 THU Ail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 2 3
j P11 1 0 0 7 3 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 24
01-22-93 FRI All 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0
PM 4 2 1 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
01-23-93 SAT AM 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
PM 1 2 1 0 4 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1,1
01-24-93 SUN All 0 0 0 5. 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0
PM 0 2 0 0 4 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 17
01-25-93 MON AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 2 1
PM 4 1 1 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 33
01-26-93 TUE All 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 2 1.
P11 2 3 6 7 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 ;56
01-27-93 WED AM 0 0 0 0 o 0 —PM 3C , SC 5C mo0` -<r OC OC Or or O 1---+�* 24
230
7-DAY DAILY
TOTAL AVERAGE
1ST 7-DAYS 1.88 27
180 27 <---- F7uELIMINARY-ADT
71
al
L ^ `
U r S•
- Y -I .•. ..' O r) - 'r t-
�H ...I .2 r7 - 1 r- • .1 : al
••'e `L ._ C• ►- IT J - '. ••. ^ r-. I- r
r' v
1
O .-
c7 ^1 •n •?• e-n •n -1 1'- C., n 1 ^ee 1...) L1
I' C _ = .w
..
I P., I, "A I'•1 .r .r, e 1 ,'1 4' r. ',-) r1 , r. •.., r
T in --1,..
-1 Mit
I z 1 ^I r - _ .• L .7 •7 C•. . - _ T nl T
1 1
1.1` V l!
A. r .r .I - r _, r N _
111
In nl `c J ^ _ 1.1 l_
J C ti r ry
_ _ r C T) l1 1 l 27 ? J - J . CS., P., J
J -T, .n .r - ... .. 4r r- „^
� ,
l) V
1^ J r C n J ,C• 1.-. r., C. ^, r- .1. K Y.
1 fn nl N nl r rl n. -I .- r rl -1 r •r el .-.
J ^ Z.. 1-
•
F- el 1... .r
u, .r I.. .. r- r,. er •❑ .•, , ,., L-1 T .- 1....) 1..) r ,
U 7 1 -' I1 ,.Ir ...I ...... .. ^` .-• "I _ •n r l r, .. O 1-4 IIn ..r. in
.. r- .0 V. .' .. ,.
► n
U. IL.) •
► ~ v1
11 ►- i., Y
G▪ 'T I.1 U
1. 4. r- f- .0 I'C •l 1.1 If. I- .1 .' e7 'C Q, r -. r,
r .0
> J 1• VI fS I. V• nin r. r., .r IT .0 S •(' .f ri •f :r
• I .2 0. 1- ee .. .e C- •1'. . r• . .
V' 1- 7 ] w-
N e. •) C. -• e.. n1 r1 .1 J C' IT .' •r ,-, Ir .S \ . . C) J
.- J I.1 •;� N ti (.1 •••1 r- Li,. .f .•
...I1... :I II r I -. •. ^ N n- -. I.. ti A ... f`
U C . ..
• v - - - r _ - -' - - ' - _ > /►
C r ly •_ p. cT C , f . r 1 C ._ C -_ .1 C
-1 ; .-1 _)
;] II In ✓I . I... na. 1- IL VI Vf
111.114
nl nl N •`1 rV rV r1 rl r: r1
..` T
\ I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1
•n r.1 -•. •0 A .-. T
_ ^1 ll
..1 .a I': -1 N
Cr- I
I
I
I
I
rJ .. r C' O O U y 1=) O
1
_ u n .c a J , u
n• C .T -- - �`. _ .
r r,
.. r r` r
V1
v
• et ..
. O It- r:
•
`C 7 .I. r ..r `r: :-J .•r1 .. .•n ont_- J
I r C.
C. ►-
^r IL I w '1'.. U•r P. P. .. 'I1 .0 r• .., ... C- r
1 L., • r 1 r .••. C •- r r r
u v
C r C) f1 N. r N.
_� SiJ �. Si r n• .� t_ U
^ — n .0 P. : r. N rr r- .• N' C ti
N• .-+ .... r. .r. �. ....
•S ••. ... nl .•+ r` .... rl .r r l .r
I
I Z I nl ^S .r;r - • _ l
I r .. •r .. -. .. ... .5.
r♦ !1
- ._ Y • v rJ r .. sr, . — � ... .. .f r: nr •J r r en
_ r1
V C..)
N. t11 r P" ... r •- >
1 LJ Y• t .4 h Ci ] �, r f J ^� 1!1 r. .w V^, C .1' .
_ 'L` rJ •O - Z
r1 r1 , r. r: r.'. rJ
_ Ir ..
1 N L
C J 1' J
In
I.' r: r. I V r
7 I. .n
1 n
t' r_ n1
Noes
n r r P n
C ... C.
C.) . n. :r. . PD CA In -C.l C• r lc,
J P^
r. N Y t.
> N a C 4 "C
_ ..1. •T V 1- I"' N N .L t, p U U u
:•. ... r) • .t 1 N. r J f- .-. . - C.
•
r•J ' 1,1 •f 7 J U n p 1
U- l": 1-. re V. r. n1 ..1 .r .--• ... n1 .••. -p G. .r rJ P.-
..... ti
Y"� IL V` n: .f J
K r_ > N —
1 V ",
l r. K C:
U. Si r
•
I Q C- I- ramr — 'Z. N h J ;f .-.r('1 .-• r. es/ r. r. r r^, Cyr
M\ v1 C C 1. r. r' r' N
J r K
I- Q .J Cl r r 4- ..) I' pi Cr N. N. T N. r+ C T ,., .r Si_ 1.1
t�- .� '� 11 - r N L. C` r. ... CD I-. rJ r1 C v1 I.1 st C T.
t
r
V1 N `r = U..; CC f
r l I.- ; I.-. N N
C., ^J rJ PA r�
^J
O \ I, r, .. N. N. r^' I
l r l ... I I .I I I I I I ..
Ji CC ..r e`.. V I I I 1 ly - 0 r. N CA 0 0 0
f .r r J \ .or n-i - C .- I O •• 1 I
TRF160 CALTRANS - TRAFFIC VOLUMES DIST 04 CNTR STA ___ CT INTR 60 MIN USER
01/28/93 DETAIL TRAFFIC COUNTS CO ALA DIREC W CT FACT 0.100 8ATCI
22:13 PRELIMINARY ADT, PEAK HOUR % RTE 580 TYPE RN____ PTID
C = COMPUTER ESTIMATED COUNT POSTMII..E-LEG 19.051 - WE. ON FR NB HOPYA1
( ) = PARTIAL DAY TOTAL DAILY
DATE DAY 12-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-0 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 TOTAL
01-19-93 TUE AM 560
PM 589 590 600 594 814 1050 671 455 370 390 197 102 ( 6,982:
01-20-93 WED AM 82 61 55 24 76 180 327 554 514 468 415 495
PM 494 522 551 578 738 983 637 365 301 268 233 111 9,032
01-21-93 THU AM 59 64 47 40 77 150 296 636 536 470 457 490
FM 591 537 567 530 704 977 632 410 335 291 197 108 9,201
01-22-93 FRI AM 79 92 65 35 72 173 200 SOS 500 477 466 553
PM 597 586 594 595 738 953 644 430 333 281 237 104 9,405
01-23-93 SAT AM 146 152 103 54 40 72 99 102 257 343 300 418
PM 520 501 518 450 415 383 370 311 240 241 234 219 6,656
01-24-93 SUN AM 176 149 89 56 20 43 64 98 164 217 325 374
PM 392 419 409 385 368 360 334 251 201 167 100 66 5,235
01-25-93 MON AM 42 42 22 26 70 156 269 525 404 454 420 497
PM 538 494 541 557 665 1028 556 404 357 235 170 98 0,650
01-26-93 TUE AM 62 40 42 28 70 151 305 512 505 444 420 522
22
PM 552 518 493 530 744 1028 666 458 351 346 216 97 '7,108
01-27-93 WED AM 64 50 42 31 50 140 316 595 492 467 415C 495C
PM 494C 522C 551C 578C 738C 983C 637C 365C 301C 268C 233C 111C 0,954
73,303
7-DAY DAILY
TOTAL AVERAGE
1ST 7-DAYS 57,367 0,195
_ 11 I I 1 I . 1 . 1 I '',36 ) I1.95 I---_ --pIN'...)Y-A- 1 1 I _ 1 -_I
I
1
1
1
1
Appendix E
Level of Service Calculations
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1,ANTA RITA REGIONAL OI3000NT RETAIL ENTER
HACIENDA DRIVE c DUBLIN BOULEVARD
— E-ist.r,g Conditions
1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - UNSIGNALI:Eu iNIana=uTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET
=====_=_=====_==__
NORTH EAST SOUTHWEST
VARIABLE AT TH _ , RT TH LT -H LT rT 'H LT
VOLUMES ,ph ) 3 148 1 =5 44 0 1 4 3 , 0
LANES x ) 3
0
— 3RADE 3 ,
PCE FACTOR ; . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 3.00
— VOLUMES pcph ) 3 163 ; 49 48 3
153 3 _ 0 0
CONTROL TYPE STOP -?VERAGE _- ( DESIRED ) C5 MPH
— POPULATION 1000'S ) 0 AVERAGE 'SPEED ( USED ) 35 MPH
Critical Potential Percent :mpeaance Actual
MVMT Vc(vph ) Gap Capacity Utilization Factor Capacity
MINOR STREET - EAST APPROACH
RT 153 5.7 897 0.054 0.968 897
LT 436 6.8 498 0.024 0.985 447
— MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
SOUTH 158 5. 1 977 0. 152 0.898 977
VEL
— MVMT V(pcph) Cm(pcph ) Csh(pcph ) Cr-MUT Cr-SHRD LEMVT OF SHRDICE
MINOR STREET - EAST APPROACH
RT 48 897 849 A
— LT 12 447 435 A
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
SOUTH 149 977 828 A
=as==Q===Q
•.
SANTA RITA REGIONAL DISCOUNT PETAIL :ENTEP
Tassaiara Road & Dublin 3auievard
Existino Conditions ...
1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - •.JNSIGNALIDED I':TERSECTION CA,PACIT'' .:ORKSHEET
NORTH EAST SOUTH -:EST
VARIABLE RT -H LT RT TH LT R7 "H LT RT -H LT
VOLUMES vph ) 9 17S 0 3 3 :SS ' =S J 22
LANES It ) 3 _ _
:F DE .: ) _ -.
Pa FACTOR . i0 0.00 . 10 ' . 10
VOLUMES pcph ) 10 134 0 0 0 0 _ :96 33 0 24
Pig
CONTR3L TYPE STOP nvERAGE :FEE: ,DESIRED ' :G MPH I
POPULATION ( 1000'S ) 0 AVERAGE SPEED (USED ) 35 MPH
—
==== ==
Critical Potential Percent ::.pecence Actual —
MVMT Vc(vph ) Gap Capacity Utilization actor Capacity
MINOR STREET - WEST APPROACH
RT 176 5.7 874 0. 174 0.881 574
LT 498 6.8 a55 0.053 0.968 -39
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS -
NORTH 185 5. 1 967 0.060 0.964 967
LEVEL IF SERVICE
MVMT V(pcph ) Cm(pcph ) Csh( pcph ) Cr-MVT Or-SHRD MVT SHRD
MINOR STREET - WEST APPROACH
RT 162 874 722 A
LT 24 439 415 A
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
NORTH 58 967 908 A
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 2/9/94
CONDITION : a;iStingw FILE 1990sr.g
INTERSECTION : 1573 JURISDICTN Dublin
N-S STREET : Tassajara Rd E-W STREET : Dublin Blvd
COUNT DATE: 1/25/94 TIME:4:00-6:00 PM PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 6693
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 2.20
9 176 0 L 0 S : A
,,ODE 6696 ' I 1 I ^ NOOE 6752 S WARR(U,R): N N
CVC:R =0.04721 <--I v I- > I CVC:L =0.0000
LEFT 22 ---I 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1--- 0 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 138---I 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1--- 0 LEFT
I <--1 I..= 1 SPLIT?N
• I I I
53 269 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 6697
CVC:T =0.1494 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 3975 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : DOUGHERTY RD. E-W STREET : 1-580 WB OFF
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:T =0.5050 NODE 3701
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.70
565 1818 0 LOG : B
NODE 3976 ' 1 1 1 NODE 3974 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.00001 <--I v 1--> 1 CVC:R =0.1922
LEFT 0---1 0.0 1.9 2.0 0.0 2.0 I--- 629 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0 •--1 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 I--- 294 LEFT
I <•'1 ' I.-> 1 SPLIT? N
• I I I
0 1370 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 8669
CVC:L =0.0000 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 3977 JURISDICTN : DUBLIN
N-S STREET : DOUGHERTY RD. E-W STREET : DUBLIN BLVD.
COUNT DATE: 1/24/94 TIME:4:00-6:00 PM PK HR:5:00-6:00 PM
CVC:T =0.2506 NODE 9483
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.63
58 827 92 L 0 S : B
NODE 4119 ^ I I I ^NODE 5323 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.07331 <--I v 1--> 1 CVC:T =0.0330
LEFT 121 ---I 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 140 RIGHT
TRRU 130--->1.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.0<--- 109 THRU
RIGHT 966---I 2.5 2.0 2.1 1.1 2.0 1--- 57 LEFT
<"I ^ I '> 1 SPLIT?N
• I I I V
818 1053 48
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 3701
CVC:L 40.2727 SPLIT?N PHASE: 8
CCTA INTERSECTICN LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 2/9/94
CONDITION : existing FILE 1990sr.g
INTERSECTION : 3981 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET Hopyara Rd E-W STREET Owens Or -
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 ME:3:00-7:00 PH PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:L =0.1390 NODE 3993
RIGHT THOU LEFT TOT V/C 0.68
240 1045 417 L 0 S 3 -
NODE 9681 I 1 I " NODE 5539 S WARRIU,R): Y Y
CVC:TRL=0.2052I <--I v I--> I CVC:TR =0.0743
LEFT 635 ---! 3.1 1.1 3.1 2.0 2.1 I--- 398 RIGHT -
THRU 159 •• > 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1 <--- 54 THRU
RIGHT 89 ---I 1.1 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1--- 74 LEFT
<-'I " I--> I SPLIT? Y
I I I
177 1285 121
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 5538
CVC:T =0.2596 SPLIT? N PHASE: 6
INTERSECTION : 3985 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Santa Rita Rd E-W STREET : W Las Fos:Las
COUNT DATE: 2/6/90 TIME:3:00-7:00 pm PK HR:4:30-5:30 pm
CVC:L =0.0430 NODE 9469
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.44
205 959 129 L 0 S : A
NODE 9009 A I I I ^ NODE 9757 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.1057I <'-I v I--' I CVC:R .0.0552
LEFT 317---I 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.1 I--- 91 RIGHT
THRU 257---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.1 <--- 84 THRU
RIGHT 286---I 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 I--- 173 LEFT
I <--I ^ I' > I SPLIT? N -
I I I
241 1182 260
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 1528
CVC:T =0.2388 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
INTERSECTION : 3988 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON -
N-S STREET : TASSAJARA RD. E-W STREET 1-580 W8 OFF
COUNT DATE: 02/06/90 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 6698
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.22
98 257 0 LDS : A
NODE 3986 A I I I "NODE 4039 S WARR(U,R): N Y
CVC:R =0.0000I <--I v I--> I CVC:L =0.1619 -
LEFT 0 •--I 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 I--- 90 RIGHT
THRU 0 ---a 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0---I 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 I--- 530 LEFT
I <--I ^ I' > I SPLIT? N
I I I V -
0 211 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 5451
CVC:T =0.0586 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 2/9/94
CONDITION : existing FILE 1990sr.g
INTERSECTION : 3990 JURISDICTN Pleasanton
N-S STREET Hopyard Rd E-W STREET Stoneridge Dr
COUNT DATE: 1/5/93 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:T =0.2065 NODE 9646
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.58
95 1022 281 L 0 S : A
NODE 3991 I I I NODE 5537 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:T =0.18301 <--I v I--> CVC:L =0.0430
LEFT 190 ---1 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 I--- 149 RIGHT
THRU 604 -- > 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 3.0 <- - 605 THRU
RIGHT 479 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 --- 129 LEFT
<--1 - I--> SPLIT) N
I I I
457 975 26
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 4099
CVC:L =0.1523 SPLIT) N PHASE: 8
INTERSECTION : 3993 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : HOPYARD RD. E-W STREET : 1-580 EB OFF
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 8669
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.84
01235 0 LDS : D
NODE 3994 I I I -NODE 3992 S UARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:R =0.31171 <--( v I--> 1 CVC:L =0.0000
LEFT 394 ---I 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 I--- 0 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 561 ---1 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 1--- 0 LEFT
<-"I I-"> 1 SPLIT? N
I I I
0 1891 471
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 3981
CVC:T =0.5253 SPLIT'? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 4041 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : SANTA RITA RD E-W STREET : I-580 ES OFF
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:L =0.0788 NODE 5451
RIGHTTHOU LE1FT TOT V/C : 0..•c
T y L OS : .C' ✓)5q .pm✓
NODE 3995 = I I I "NODE 7952 S WRR(U,R): Y Y ,/
CVC:TL=0.13421 <--I V I--> I CVC:R =0.1085 Iq�0 Fr.OM✓
LEFT 117---I 1.1 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 309 RIGHT 1
THRU 326--->2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 530 ---I 1.9 0.0 4.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 159 LEFT
" I--> I SPLIT?Y
_ V I I I
0 Aile FOr
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 7879
CVC:R =0.4739 SPLIT?N PHASE: 5
1,341
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 9/1/94
CONDITION : existing FILE 1990SR.G
INTERSECTION : 4058 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Santa Rita Rd E-W STREET Stoneridge Dr
CWNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:L =0.0723 NODE 1528
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.54
107 1218 217 L 0 S : A
NCOE 9471 " I I I ^ NODE 1095 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:R =0.16471 <--I v I--' I CVC:L =0.0267
LEFT 54 ---I 1.0 1.1 3.1 2.0 1.0 I--- 144 RIGHT -
THRU 137 -- > 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 3.0 <--- 99 THRU
RIGHT 627 ---1 2.0 2.0 3.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 44 LEFT
I ---- - ---- - SPLIT? N
I I I
241 1340 27
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 1532
CVC:TR=0.2762 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
INTERSECTION : 8302 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-W STREET : 1-580 EB ramp
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM -
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 8304
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.20
8 202 0 LDS : A
NODE 9770 ^ I I I ^NODE 9765 S WARR(U,R): N Y
CVC:R =0.08491 <--I v I--> I CVC:L =0.0000
LEFT 4 ---I 1.0 1.9 3.0 0.0 0.0 1--- 0 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 278 ---I 2.0 0.0 3.0 1.9 0.0 1--- 0 LEFT
<--1 1.-' I SPLIT? N
V I I I V
0 634 460
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 8979
CVC:T =0.1174 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 8305 JURISDICTN : Dublin
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-W STREET : I-580 WB ramp
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK NR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 6661
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.07
O 74 0 L 0 S : A
NODE 9771 ^ I I I ^NODE 9764 S WARR(U,R): N N
CVC:R =0.00001 <--I v 1--> I CVC:L =0.0416
LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 1.9 3.0 0.0 1.0 1--- 70 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 I--- 136 LEFT
^ I--' I SPLIT?N -
V I I I V
O 88 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 8304
CVC:T =0.0244 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2 -
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 2/9/94
CONDITION : existing FILE 1990sr.g
INTERSECTION : 8306 JURISDICTN : Dublin
N-S STREET Hacienda Dr E-W STREET : Dublin Blvd
COUNT SATE: 1/20/94 TIME:4:00-6:00 PM PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:L =0.0750 NODE 6660
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C 3.17
0 148 135 LOS : A
NODE 1108 I I I NODE 6662 S WARRIU,R): N N
CVC:R =0.00001 <--I V I--> I CVC:L =0.0061
LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 44 RIGHT
THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 11 LEFT
I <-.I " I--> I SPLIT? N
I I I
0 148 10
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 6680
CVC:TR =0.0878 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 8979 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-W STREET : Owens Dr
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME: PK HR:
CVC:L =0.0753 NODE 8302
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.45
39 128 226 L 0 S : A
NODE 5522 I I I "NODE 7450 S VARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.01931 <--1 v I--> I CVC:R =0.2515
LEFT 58 ---I 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 1--- 539 RIGHT
THRU 305 ---> 3.0 (NO. OF LANES) 3.0 <--- 206 THRU
RIGHT 4 ---1 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 I--- 87 LEFT
1 <--I " 1--> 1 SPLIT? N
I I I V
7 494 60
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 1518
CVC:T =0.0998 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
INTERSECTION : 9470 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-W STREET : Stoneridge Dr
COUNT DATE: 12/9/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:R =0.0503 NODE 9040
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.32
83 65 8 LOS : A
NODE 5535 1 1 1 "NODE 9042 S WARR(U,R): B Y
CVC:TR=0.23211 <--1 V 1--> 1 CVC:L =0.0018
LEFT 122---I 1.0 1.1 3.1 1.0 1.1 1--- 5 RIGHT
THRU 755 --->2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 3.1 <- - 541 THRU
RIGHT 11 ---1 1.1 1.0 3.1 1.1 1.0 1--- 3 LEFT
1 <.-1 " I--> 1 SPLIT? N
1 1 1
54 163 3
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 5542
CVC:L =0.0327 SPLIT?N PHASE: 8
oft
•••
..•
m.•
am
..m
.%
...
...
•••
•..
—
3ANTA RITA REGIONAL DISCOUNT RETAIL CENTER
HACIENDA DRIVE & DUBLIN BOULEVARD
BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
— _985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET
—
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
VARIABLE RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
—VOLUMES (vph) 0 557 135 44 0 43 14 204 0 0 0 0
LANES (#) 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
GRADE 0
0 0 0
— PCE FACTOR 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.00
VOLUMES (pcph) 0 613 149 48 0 47 15 224 0 0 0 0
CONTROL TYPE STOP AVERAGE SPEED (DESIRED) 35 MPH
— POPULATION (1000'S) 0 AVERAGE SPEED (USED) 35 MPH
Critical Potential Percent Impedance Actual
MVMT Vc(vph) Gap Capacity Utilization Factor Capacity
_MINOR STREET - EAST APPROACH
RT 211 5.7 839 0.058 0.965 839
LT 903 6.8 240 0.197 0.862 215
—MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
SOUTH 218 5.1 944 0.157 0.894 944
MVMT V(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh LEVEL OF SERVICE
(pcph) Cr-MVT Cr-SHRD MVT SHRD
MINOR STREET - EAST APPROACH
RT 48 839 791 A
LT 47 215 167 D
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
SOUTH 149 944 795 A
•.
_'nr;in ^ t1F1 irriw' ni _- _-1_U!l! -if_!n;_ _^ „„t
"n-rn.ir,rn mini, ry •li:ni ,Iti niriii 7..V! r
.f;1=1 t1 Illy 1.1)I V I. 1^•iti r•
oft
i •in=t ni1_nwnr 1_nrnr::! ..^rvini - _ivj_I_ivni l:-_ -'i!C.,--_ --ry �nrnr_i i •."1,1. MCC' 1
aft
."2!1.iri _nj! _.1iiri aE j 1
:inn i nni - r i ^i - n 1 iri •_ ri _ wri L i
nI
nWr ' w I •_I11 L
71
inn •r - /I it
- - 71•
_ :Vlvr _
,_,Jr,in lj% •iri_ -.•Iyyr n,/Cnr�rr -- • �ir•r1'er_i nI
r�fri ii 7i .,irj :ynty! _ • •'n ^iiis_nn�C __ _ C_ _ ;rri 1
r
i t. _1 ^ t.
i ^nGr+ ^
l_J. F. -
r- Gn.. _nocumnct riri.1.r r_r1S
ri'iirii sir.1vnry i nn r npCr_- iii i i i:_I ir•In - _,._�.nr _..^_+rli.y
Munn -.nnn n
CH
n T I r 0 n. ! n/Y V I r 1 ^w ,n n 1 ^ I w
n
nn 1
rint�lfr} STREET LEFT i%r.N_+
�V_Hain n'_1 _ : 1 v1:VIn V1 L1:�ir1�L = ;'
i r-vrt _r �r rlV ll•C `
r!Vrii +.i;C}Gv}-! i %}w�^ran i i_nn pGpt+ r Cr-riVi _:r--=nnu ••.Ui -int/
•f,rnn rQ.1. ,MMMONA^11 a
ni �it 874 ir_ n
i♦ -s n
r•i 4 w3B 4j_r n
•n •nn n,nrrT rT n,,rn
nn.avn o!ncc} L Er± !vnwa
nn T1 r rn nnA
ilun!n oo 7n r ^vrp n
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 3/8/94
CONDITION : 1995 Background RILE 1995sr.g
INTERSECTION : 1573 JURISDICTN : Dublin
N-S STREET : Tassajara Rd E-4 STREET : Dublin Blvd
COUNT DATE: 1/25/94 TIME:4:00-6:00 PM PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 6693
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : C.20
9 176 0 LOS : A
NODE 6696 I I I ^ NODE 6752 S WARR(U,R): N M
CVC:R =0.04721 <--I v I--> I CVC:L =0.0000
LEFT 22 ---I 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 I--- 0 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 138 ---I 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 I--- 0 LEFT
<--I I--' I SPLIT? N
I I I
53 269 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 6697
CVC:T =0.1494 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 3975 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : DOUGHERTY RD. E-W STREET : I-580 NB OFF
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:T =0.5633 NODE 3701
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.79
582 2028 0 L 0 S : C
NODE 3976 I I I =NODE 3974 S NARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.00001 <--I v 1--> I CVC:R =0.2243
LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 1.9 2.0 0.0 2.0 I--- 734 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 I--- 321 LEFT
<--I ^ I--' I SPLIT? N
I I I
0 1426 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 8669
CVC:L =0.0000 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 3977 JURISDICTN : DUBLIN
N-S STREET : DOUGHERTY RD. E-N STREET : DUBLIN BLVD.
COUNT DATE: 1/24/94 TIME:4:00-6:00 PM PK HR:5:00-6:00 PM
CVC:T =0.2506 NODE 9483
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.63
58 827 92
L 0 S B
NODE 4119 ^ I I I NODE 5323 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.07331 <--I V I--> I CVC:T =0.0330
LEFT 121 ---I 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 140 RIGHT
THRU 130 ---> 1.0 (N0. OF LANES) 2-0<--- 109 THRU
RIGHT 966---I 2.5 2.0 2.1 1.1 2.0 I--- 57 LEFT
I <--1 ^ I--> 1 SPLIT?N
I I I V
818 1053 48
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 3701
CVC:L =0.2727 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 3/8/94
CONDITION : 1995 Background FILE 1995sr.9
INTERSECTION : 3981 JURISDICTN Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hopyard Rd E-W STREET Ovens Or
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:L =0.2337 NODE 3993
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C 2.83
360 1004 701 L 0 S D
NODE 9681 I1 NODE 5539 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:TRL=0.2867I <--I v I--> I CVC:T =0.0521
LEFT 875 •--; 3.1 1.1 3.1 2.0 2.5 I--- 693 RIGHT
THRU 224 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0 <--- 86 THRU
RIGHT 135 --•I 1.1 1.0 4.1 1.1 0.0 I--- 0 LEFT
<.-1 I--' I SPLIT? Y
I I I
269 1517 180
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 5538
CVC:TR =0.2571 SPLIT? N PHASE: 6
INTERSECTION : 3985 IURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Santa Rita Rd E-W STREET : W Las Positas
COUNT DATE: 2/6/90 TIME:3:00-7:00 pm PK HR:4:30-5:30 pm
CVC:T =0.2828 NODE 9469
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.65
237 1400 140 L 0 S : 8
NODE 9009 A I I I " NODE 9757 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.14471 <--I v I--' I CVC:TR=0.0706
LEFT 434 •--I 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.1 I--- 91 RIGHT
THRU 317---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.1 < - 142 THRU
RIGHT 469 --•I 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 I--- 221 LEFT
1 <--I 1- I SPLIT? N
I I
468 1613 295
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 1528
CVC:L =0.1560 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
INTERSECTION : 3988 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : TASSAJARA RD. E-W STREET : 1-580 W8 OFF
COUNT DATE: 02/06/90 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK KR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 6698
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.31
98 257 0 L O S : A
NODE 3986 I I I =NODE 4039 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:R =0.00001 <--1 v 1--> 1 CVC:L =0.2356
LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 1--- 90 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0---1 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1--- 771 LEFT
I a--1 . 1--> 1 SPLIT?N
I I I V -
0 270 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 5451
CVC:T =0.0750 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 3/8/94
CONDITION : 1995 Background FILE 1995sr.g
INTERSECTION : 3990 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hopyard Rd E-N STREET : Stoneridge Dr
COUNT DATE: 1/5/93 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:T =0.2121 NODE 9646
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C 0.78
187 1050 314 L 0 S : C
NODE 3991 I I I - NODE 5537 S W1RR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:1 =0.30481 <--1 v --> I CVC:L =0.0603
LEFT 308 ---I 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 I--- 221 RIGHT
THRU 1006 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 3.0<--- 1009 THRU
RIGHT 611 ---I 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 I--- 181 LEFT
I.., I SPLIT? N
I I I
598 1011 43
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 4099
CVC:L =0.1993 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
INTERSECTION : 3993 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : HOPYARD RD. E-N STREET : 1-580 EB OFF
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 8669
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.71
0 1388 0 L O S : C
NODE 3994 I I I = NODE 3992 S VARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:R =0.23531 <--I V I--> I CVC:L =0.0000
LEFT 376---I 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 I--- 0 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 770 ---I 2.0 0.0 3.0 1.9 0.0 I--- 0 LEFT
I-'> I SPLIT? N
I I I
0 2586 573
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 3981
CVC:T =0.4789 SPLIT?N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 4041 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : SANTA RITA RD E-V STREET : 1-580 ES OFF
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:L =0.0818 NODE 5451
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.68
0 749 135 LOS : 8
NODE 3995 ^ I I I NODE 7952 S UARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:TL =0.15821 <--I V I--s I CVC:R =0.1248
LEFT 127---I 1.1 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 341 RIGHT
THRU 395 --->2.1 (N0. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 741 ---I 1.9 0.0 4.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 187 LEFT
<"1 ^ I""> I SPLIT?Y
` V I I I v
0 1913 174
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 7879
CVC:TR =0.3162 SPLIT? N PHASE: 5
me
OCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 3/8/94
CONDITION : 1995 Background FILE 1995sr.g
me
INTERSECTION : 4058 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Santa Rita Rd E-6 STREET : Stoneridge Dr +
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK MR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:TR=0.3772 NODE 1528
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C 0.86
163 1704 287 L 0 S : 0
NODE 9471 I I I - NODE 1095 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:R =0.28401 <--1 v I--> I CVC:L =0.0327
LEFT 56---i 1.0 1.1 3.1 2.0 1.5 I--- 247 RIGHT +►
THRU 290 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.0 <--- 170 THRU
RIGHT 1342 ---I 2.5 2.0 3.1 1.1 2.0 1--- 98 LEFT "T
<--1 - I"-> 1 SPLIT? N
I I I
490 1957 125 A►
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 1532
CVC:L =0.1633 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
a
INTERSECTION : 8302 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-V STREET : 1-580 ES rann
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM a
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 8304
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.32
599 324 0 L 0 S : A
NODE 9770 - 1 I I NODE 9765 S 6ARR(U,R): Y Y me
CVC:R =0.12891 <--1 v I--> 1 CVC:L =0.0000
LEFT 4 ---I 1.0 1.9 3.0 0.0 0.0 1--- 0 RIGHT
a
THRU 0 --->0.0 (N0. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 422 ---1 2.0 0.0 3.0 1.9 0.0 1--- 0 LEFT
I <--1 " 1--> 1 SPLIT?N me
I I I
0 1031 846
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 8979
CVC:T =0.1909 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 8305 JURISDICTN : Dublin
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-W STREET 1-580 VB ramp
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK MR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:T =0.1106 NODE 6661
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.23
0 597 0 LOS : A
NODE 9771 I I I " NODE 9764 S WARR(U,R): N Y
CVC:L =0.00001 <--I v I--> 1 CVC:R =0.1183
LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 1.9 3.0 0.0 1.0 I--- 213 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0 ---1 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1--- 323 LEFT
I <--1 - 1--> 1 SPLIT? N
V I I I v -
0 5 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 8304
CVC:L =0.0000 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2 -
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 3/8/94
CONDITION : 1995 Background FILE 1995sr.g
INTERSECTION : 3306 JURISDICTN : Dublin
N-S STREET Hacienda Sr E-6 STREET : C•.:blin Blvd
COUNT DATE: 1/20/94 TIME:4:00-6:00 PM PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:L =0.0750 NODE 6660
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C 0.17
0 148 135 L 0 S : A
NODE 1108 I I NODE 6662 S NARR(U,R): N N
CVC:R =0.00001 <--I v I--> I CVC:L =0.0061
•- LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 44 RIGHT
THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (N0. OF LANES) 0.0 a--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 11 LEFT
I I " I--> I SPLIT? N
I I I
0 148 10
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 6680
CVC:TR =0.0878 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 8979 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-W STREET : Owens Dr
COUNT DATE: 12/1/92 TIME: PK HE:
CVC:L =0.1213 NODE 8302
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.76
116 244 364 L 0 S : C
NODE 5522 " I I I "NODE 7450 S VARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.09531 <--I v I--> I CVC:R =0.3964
LEFT 286 ---I 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 I--- 854 RIGHT
THRU 567---> 3.0 (NO. OF LANES) 3.0 a--- 265 THRU
RIGHT 116 ---I 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 I--- 164 LEFT
<--I " I-'> I SPLIT? N
I I I v
77 735 149
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 1518
CVC:T =0.1485 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
INTERSECTION : 9470 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hacienda Or E-W STREET : Stoneridge Dr
COUNT DATE: 12/9/92 TIME:3:00-7:00 PM PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:R =0.0812 NODE 9040
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.47
134 87 120 L O S : A
NODE 5535 I I I "NODE 9042 S UARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:TR=0.3300I <--I v I--> I CVC:L =0.0055
LEFT 198---I 1.0 1.1 3.1 1.0 1.1 I--- 40 RIGHT
THRU 1067---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 3.1 <--- 791 THRU
RIGHT 22---I 1.1 1.0 3.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 9 LEFT
I <--I " I-'> I SPLIT?N
I I I
88 241 24
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 5542
CVC:L =0.0533 SPLIT?N PHASE: 8
- ANTA RITA REGIONAL DISCOUNT RETAIL CENTER
. ACIENDA IRIVE & DUBLIN BOULEVARD
BACKGROUND + PROJECT CONDITIONS
- 1985 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET
- NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
VARIABLE RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH IT RT TH LT
_ VOLUMES (vph) 0 557 374 195 0 824 190 292 0 0 0 0
LANES (f) 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
GRADE (%) 0 0 0
0
_ PCE FACTOR 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.00
VOLUMES (pcph) 0 613 411 215 0 906 209 321 0 0 0 0
CONTROL TYPE STOP AVERAGE SPEED (DESIRED) 35 MPH
--POPULATION (1000'S) 0 AVERAGE SPEED (USED) 35 MPH
Critical Potential Percent Impedance Actual
RUNT Vc(vph) Gap Capacity Utilization Factor Capacity
MINOR STREET - EAST APPROACH
RT 387 5.7 681 0.315 0.747 681
LT 1318 6.8 127 7.140 1.000 63
--MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
SOUTH 482 5.1 705 0.584 0.498 705
MVMT V(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh LEVEL OF SERVICE
(pcph) Cr-MVT Cr-SHRD MVT SHRD
-MINOR STREET - EAST APPROACH
RT 215 681 467 A
LT 906 63 -843 F
MAJOR STREET LEFT TURNS
SOUTH 411 705 293 C
Amt
•
=n+iin n_!n r+r,j_iJiy'L __-�_Ln.JN! •r?r _riy'r+
inrrn,innn nurlu ty L"'CLir! nrji_'LC;inni+ 1
nrl!,r..gnv iiiL T ^niJ.ir%1 i_'J!L'j!1_irl
i in% r_rjriwn,i _A
nn,
:!,T .niViini - _,,covp' _•_-_TMIT 1w,Cn.7__'liriq r_ni-nt_i ! , wiinjPlnEL 1 Sib
l
n•
,AR 1 nCLL n! , _ TT
In _i n t ri _ . - i 1 L'
!terL jY!/_: •.VnM r __ , ,r1 Y' V' J' V . 4.nn Lt, _ 1 `r-
_ '0
LnWC; * I 5' ��
^C_C fra.!Gn • , i yr ,vrvr ' . ,yr
"VLLir'C' -== -- T' - -,
Tnn, T I r -
,�ur ! rJL !�I .! iiVf nVE7r—' =r'C=L' 'L'Cy1rC:.' 1' 7' MPH r.
n1 _ MT - n�
,-yr uLni lun! . i ovv- . ' v nyrnr,r _.r= - , V7,,-" _ri ryrri
Lr'i41G^.1 r'7SC!'rSlnj, P.,r•rrtrn?. : 'ip _�...__ 7iri;i171
r,vrii siC,,vrr i r.,ow Corre!r.l-.v 1ii.111<n+.ir_+n =TC;:.rr _npnn1iv
♦unn
nIrli n. D !CCT 1 RCC! wCp r rir i-niin%ii
MT
T 1 n
MT nrrT
r!rlovn ,nLL! LCr 1 !UnriQ
y.in', ' 70 j, 1 QOt v',:7Lv_� vr,f'+- OOL
I",rr, r r 1 n r
LLVCL Lir oCflV14C
T 1.119
ri�iri! •
�i‘Cr;pn i !,m1 p'Cpr! ! ..om pGpri , Cr-MV i ,:r-inns, ?'1V! ?r]flV ,
lr'in. O!ri C rr r - WEST nrrrvnL.n
n 1 '!YJL O f, :siL n
-n nn�
aQ LJV. LY'rC C
L!
11 JOR STREET LEFT TURNS
nn T/O -I1n n
r1VR.r n 308 70L nrnw n
1
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 7/14/94
CONDITION Sackgrouna Plus Project FILE 1995sr.g
INTERSECTION : 1573 JURISDICTN Dublin
N-S STREET Tassajara Rd E-W STREET Dublin Slvd
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:T =0.0978 NODE 6693
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.30
22 176 0 L 0 S : A
NODE 6696 I I I ' NODE 6752 S WARR(U,R): 4 Y
CVC:R =0.04721 <--Iv I--> I CVC:L =0.0000
LEFT 35 ---I 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.01--- 0 RIGHT
THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 365 ---I 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 I--- 0 LEFT
I <"'I ^ I--> I SPLIT? N
I I I
280 269 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 6697
CVC:L =0.1556 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 3975 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : D .IGHERTY RD. E-W STREET 1-580 WB OFF
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK NR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:T =0.5703 NODE 3701
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.79
582 2053 0 L 0 S : C
NODE 3976 I I I NODE 3974 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.00001 <--I v I"-> I CVC:R =0.2243
LEFT 0 ---1 0.0 1.9 2.0 0.0 2.0 I--- 734 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1--- 321 LEFT
<--I I--> I SPLIT? N
Y I I I
0 1451 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NOCE 8669
CVC:L =0.0000 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 3977 JURISDICTN : DUBLIN
N-S STREET : DOUGHERTY RD. E-W STREET : DUBLIN BLVD.
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:5:00.6:00 PM
CVC:T =0.2506 NODE 9483
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.70
58 827 193 L 0 S : B
NODE 4119 I I I "NODE 5323 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:T =0.14731 <--I V 1--> I CVC:L =0.0273
LEFT 121 ---I 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 241 RIGHT
THRU 243 ---> 1.0 (N0. OF LANES) 2.0<--- 222 THRU
RIGHT 966---I 2.5 2.0 2.1 1.1 2.0 I--- 82 LEFT
--1 " I '> 1 SPLIT?N
V I I I
818 1053 73
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 3701
CVC:L =0.2727 SPLIT?N PHASE: 8
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 7/14/94 1
CONDITION Background Plus Project FILE 1995sr.g
INTERSECTION : 3981 ;URISDICTH : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hopyard Rd E-W STREET : Owens Jr
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM 1
CVC:L =0.2337 NODE 3993
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.34
360 1029 701 L 0 S :
NODE 9681 I 1 I " NODE 5539 S WARR(U,R): r r
CVC:TRL=0.28671 <--I v 1--> 1 CVC:T =0.0521
LEFT 875 ---I 3.1 1.1 3.1 2.0 2.5 I--- 693 RIGHT
THRU 224 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0 <--- 86 THRU 1
RIGHT 135 ---I 1.1 1.0 4.1 1.1 0.0 I--- 0 LEFT
I <--I A ---> I SPLIT? Y
V I I I V
269 1542 205
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 5538
CVC:TR =0.2647 SPLIT? N PHASE: 6
INTERSECTION : 3985 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton oft
N-S STREET : Santa Rita Rd E-W STREET : W Las Positas
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:4:30-5:30 pm
CVC:T =0.3006 NODE 9469
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.68
275 1488 140 L 0 S : 3
NODE 9009 I I I "NODE 9757 S WARR(U,R): Y
CVC:L =0.1573I <--I v 1--> I CVC:TR =0.0706 ""
LEFT 472 ---1 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.1 I--- 91 RIGHT
THRU 317-- >2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.1 <- - 142 THRU ...
RIGHT 469 ---i 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 I--- 221 LEFT
I <'-I " I."> I SPLIT? N
I I I Ve.
468 1701 295
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 1528
CVC:L =0.1560 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
ft
INTERSECTION : 3988 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : TASSAJARA RD. E-W STREET : 1-580 WB OFF
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 6698
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.35
98 484 0 L O S A
NODE 3986 I I I "NODE 4039 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:R =0.00001 <--I v I--> I CVC:L =0.2356
LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 I--- 191 RIGHT �.
THRU 0--->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU
.►
RIGHT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 I--- 771 LEFT
I <--I " I > I SPLIT?N
I I
0 396 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 5451
CVC:T =0.1100 SPLIT?N PHASE: 2
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 7/15/94
^ :TNDITION Background Plus Project FILE 1995sr.g
INTERSECTION : 3990 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET Hopyard Rd E-W STREET : Stoneridge Dr
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:
CVC:T =0.2172 NODE 9646
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.80
2121075 314 LOS : C
NODE 3991 I I I NODE 5537 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:T =0.32391 <--I v 1--> 1 CVC:L =0.0603
LEFT 333 ---I 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 1--- 221 RIGHT
THRU 1069---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 3.0 <--- 1072 THRU
RIGHT 611 ---I 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 I--- 181 LEFT
1 <--1 I--> 1 SPLIT? N
1 1 1 v
o. 598 1036 43
LEFT THRU RIGHT NOOE 4099
CVC:L =0.1993 SPLIT?N PHASE: 8
INTERSECTION : 3993 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : HOPYARD RD. E-W STREET : 1.580 EB OFF
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:
CVC:L =0.0000 NOOE 8669
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.72
0 1413 0 L 0 S : C
NOOE 3994 1 1 1 "NOOE 3992 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:R =0.23531 <-.I v 1--> 1 CVC:L =0.0000
LEFT 376---1 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1--- 0 RIGHT
THOU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<.-- 0 THRU
RIGHT 770 ---1 2.0 0.0 3.0 1.9 0.0 I--- 0 LEFT
1 <--I " I--> 1 SPLIT?N
1 1 1
0 2611 573
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 3981
CVC:T =0.4835 SPLIT?N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 4041 JURISDICTN : PLEASANTON
N-S STREET : SANTA RITA RD E-W STREET : 1-580 ES OFF
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:
CVC:L =0.0818 NODE 5451
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C 0.70
0 875 135 L 0 S : B
NODE 3995 1 1 I " NODE 7952 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:TL =0.15821 <.-I v I--> 1 CVC:R =0.1248
LEFT 127---I 1.1 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1--- 341 RIGHT
THRU 395 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THOU
RIGHT 741 ---I 1.9 0.0 4.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 187 LEFT
<--I " I--> 1 SPLIT? Y
1 1 1
0 2039 174
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 7879
V
CVC:TR =0.3353 SPLIT? N PHASE: 5
AA
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 7/14/94
CONDITION : Background Plus Project FILE 1995sr.g
1
INTERSECTION 4058 .URISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Santa Rita Rd E-W STREET : Stoneriage Dr
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM "'1
CVC:TR =0.3949 NODE 1528
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.87
163 1792 287 L 0 S : O Ay.
NODE 9471 " I I I "NODE 1095 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:R =0.28401 <-•I V 1--> I CVC:L .0.0327
LEFT 56---I 1.0 1.1 3.1 2.0 1.5 1--- 247 RIGHT
THRU 290 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.0 <--- 170 THRU 1
RIGHT 1342 ---1 2.5 2.0 3.1 1.1 2.0 1--- 98 LEFT
I I 11 SPLIT? N 1
1 I 1 V
490 2045 125
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 1532
CVC:L =0.1633 SPLIT? N PHASE: 8
Aft
INTERSECTION : 8302 ,URISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-W STREET : 1-580 E8 ramo
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:L =0.0000 NODE 8304
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.48
813 412 0 L 0 S : A
NODE 9770 A I I I "NODE 9765 S WARR(U,R): Y Y ,,A
CVC:L =0.26831 <--I V I--> I CVC:R =0.0000
LEFT 483 ---I 1.0 1.9 3.0 0.0 0.0 1--- 0 RIGHT
THRU 0 - >0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <--- 0 THRU AA
RIGHT 422---I 2.0 0.0 3.0 1.9 0.0 I--- 0 LEFT
I I " I" > 1 SPLIT? N AA
V I I I V
0 1119 846
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 8979
CVC:T .0.2072 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 8305 JURISDICTN : Dublin ..
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-W STREET : 1-580 WB ramp
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK NR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:T =0.1665 NODE 6661
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.40
O 899 0 LOS : A
NODE 9771 " I I I =NODE 9764 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.00001 <.-I V 1--> I CVC:R =0.2372
LEFT 0---I 0.0 1.9 3.0 0.0 1.0 I--- 427 RIGHT
THRU 0--->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU
AA
RIGHT 0---1 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 1--- 323 LEFT
I <--I " I--> I SPLIT? N
V I I I V
O 572 0
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 8304
CVC:L =0.0000 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 9/8/94
CONDITION : Background Plus Project FILE 1995sr.g
INTERSECTION : 8306 JURISDICTN : Dublin
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-H STREET : Dublin Blvd
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:4:45-5:45 PM
CVC:L =0.2078 NODE 6660
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.92
0 557 374 L 0 S :
NODE 1108 I I I " NODE 6662 S WARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:R =0.00001 I v I--> I CVC:L =0.4400
LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1--- 195 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0 <• - 0 THRU
RIGHT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 792 LEFT
I <--1 " I--> I SPLIT? N
I I I
0 292 190
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 6680
CVC:TR =0.2678 SPLIT?N PHASE: 2
INTERSECTION : 8979 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-N STREET : Owens Dr
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:
CVC:L =0.1213 NODE 8302
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.78
141 307 364 L 0 S : C
NODE 5522 " I I I " NODE 7450 S NARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:L =0.10371 <•-I v I--> I CVC:R =0.3964
LEFT 311 ---I 2.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 I--- 854 RIGHT
THRU 567--->3.0 (NO. OF LANES) 3.0<--- 265 THRU
RIGHT 116 ---I 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 I--- 164 LEFT
1 <--1 " I--> I SPLIT? N
v I I I
77 798 149
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 1518
CVC:T =0.1612 SPLIT?N PHASE: 8
INTERSECTION : 9470 JURISDICTN : Pleasanton
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-U STREET : Stoneridge Dr
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:4:30-5:30 PM
CVC:R =0.1194 NODE 9040
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.51
197 87 120 L 0 S : A
NODE 5535 " I I I "NODE 9042 S NARR(U,R): Y Y
CVC:TR 0.33001 <--I v I--> I CVC:L =0.0055
LEFT 261 ---I 1.0 1.1 3.1 1.0 1.1 I--- 40 RIGHT
THRU 1067--->2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 3.1 <--- 791 THRU
RIGHT 22---I 1.1 1.0 3.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 9 LEFT
1 <-"I I--> I SPLIT?N
V I I I v
88 241 24
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 5542
CVC:L =0.0533 SPLIT?N PHASE: 8
"9
CCTA INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS 9/8/94
CONDITION : 8acgkrouna Plus Project (Full Acc) FILE 1995sr.g
INTERSECTION : 8306 JURISDICTN : Dublin
N-S STREET : Hacienda Dr E-W STREET : Dublin Blvd
COUNT DATE: TIME: PK HR:
CVC:L =0.1589 NODE 6660
RIGHT THRU LEFT TOT V/C : 0.53
0 645 286 L 0 S : A
y
NODE 1108 ^ I I I NODE 6662 S WARR(U,R): T Y
CVC:R =0.0000I <--I v I--> I CVC:L =0.1039
LEFT 0 ---I 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I--- 195 RIGHT
THRU 0 --->0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU
RIGHT 0 ---i 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 I--- 187 LEFT
I <—I " I--> I SPLIT? N
I I I V
0 292 190
LEFT THRU RIGHT NODE 6680
CVC:TR=0.2678 SPLIT? N PHASE: 2
.1
A.
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
i MY2 ACT. L WHAT is THL g3TAnnIMP E C A ACTION TARENMMEMERNME !POPV iCOMP E
mozmoogfl140001Mgmuommummmumn&MONIMIglmmoutuffiguggEREMOMMOHCCOMMINMIUBRINERNEW3guggnmagmamAPAHMEMIRMON
EMBIAOMINOMAMEREOKEURNMOROMMEIMISEIENEEMBEEINEWEREMEMEWwWEBEEMBRENIMEMBEERMEEEKEENBEEMOOMMERWREBERNO
1 J P F:
2 8C C Encourage the school district(s) to use best PREZ BLDP X Write letter to school district.
M efforts to qualify for and obtain state funding ANNE
assistance for the construction of new schools.
3 4K P Develop housing and employment monitoring TMAP CONT X X The City should set up a monitoring
L programs. SDR program. A condition will require 1.111.11
( provision of employment information by
a. Track residential growth in terms of unit employers.
type and price categories.
b. Track employment generating uses in terms
of number, type, and salary level of
employees in the planning area.
6 7E C Encourage local merchants to participate in TMAP CONT X City Manager needs to send a letter to
M programming and marketing special events in SDR the Chamber of Commerce.
public areas, such as open air markets, weekend
or lunch time concerts and seasonal
celebrations.
7 5B P Require review and approval of the following as REZO FI/O X Require condition for developers to
W a condition of project approval for applicable TMAP provide.
projects in eastern Dublin: SDR
a) Public transit route and phasing plan, to be
prepared in consultation with LAVTA.
b) Bus turnouts and transit shelters, in
consultation with LAVTA.
c) Pedestrian paths between transit stops and
building entrances.
8 9W P Require the developer to obtain proper SDR FI/O X See P. 137 of Specific Plan to develop
W approvals for storm drainage. condition.
9 4P R Work with the East Bay Regional Parks District TMAP FMAP X X Begin working with EBRPD re staging area
E to provide staging areas in the Specific Plan requirement for this site. Write
area. condition re: cooperation with EBRPD in
this process.
10 5A P Submit detailed development plans that include TMAP FMAP X X Part of SDR Process. Require condition.
W the standards for arterial streets, collector SDR BLDP
streets, residential streets, and industrial
roads.
1
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
iT_ 1t3T # 1�C1.:' T WRA i5 1$E 21 XON !t I3P1x5iT START ;i N E C A. AefZON TARLN LON L TEC :`:
Np, MEA PROD N R 0 S
Nv. NO
D S D tx
11 6A P Require review and approval of the following REZO FMAP X X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this
L elements as part of the application for TRAP BLDP project. The Development Agreement
proposed developments in eastern Dublin: SDR should provide for agreement with
Alameda County that when development
a. Clear and detailed identification of all occurs to the east all specific plan
(
potential open space areas. measures relating improvement of
b. Clear and detailed description of the Tassajara Creek should be required.
purpose and/ or function of open space areas City should begin coordinative effort to
and their relationship to other open space ensure that (c) occurs and that open
areas beyond the development of these areas; space plans are reviewed.
proposed treatment (i.e., restoration,
revegetation, etc. ) of these areas; proposed
maintenance and emergency access provisions;
the proposed ownership of open space areas; and
the responsibility for their management and
maintenance.
c. Negotiated agreements with any public
agencies that are going to acquire, manage,
and/ or maintain open space as a result of the
project, or when private entities will be
responsible for open space management and
maintenance, a detailed set of codes,
covenants, and restrictions (i.e., CC&R's) that
set forth maintenance and management standards
and, responsibilities.
d. Review of open space plans by the City PD
and fire departments and other applicable
agencies (e.g., Dept. of Fish & Game, Zone 7,
etc.) to ensure compatibility with their
standards and practices.
14 6B P Explore options for ownership and management of REZO FMAP X X Although Tassajara Creek is not a part
L areas set aside as open space. TRAP BLDP of the project, the City needs to begin
a. Encourage the East Bay Regional Park SDR discussions with the various agencies
Districtto accept ownership of the Tassajara regarding development and ownership.
Creek open space corridor. Additionally, in the development
b. Work with the Park District to develop agreement need to require dedication and
guidelines for management and uses in open development when property to the east
space areas. develops.
2
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
IT. MZT ACT. T: wE IS THE ACf.14N OR MEASgRR STAP1 END P C A ACTION TAKEN 0.0ND 06MFLETEA
Z70. MEAN<: PROG; E N O $... Nf3.
D J D P
15 6I P Negotiate the level of flood control TMAP FMAP X X Zone 7 is a reviewing agency on the
W improvements needed with Zone 7 to meet SDR BLDP project. Staff needs to continue
district standards and rightsofway requirements working with them in this area.
and maintenance responsibilities.
:8 9R P Require developers to obtain proper approvals TMAP FMAP X Write condition consistent with chart on
W for wastewater service. SDR BLDP P. 136 of Specific Plan.
19 9G P Require the developer to obtain proper approval TMAP FMAP X Write condition consistent with Chart on
W for water service. SDR BLDP P.135 of Specific Plan.
20 9E P DSRSD Standards. Require that design and TMAP FMAP X Condition that infrastructure conforms
L construction of all water and recycled water SDR GRAD to policies.
system facility improvements be in accordance
with DSRSD policies, standards, and master
plans.
21 11.3 C Prepare and adopt a Master Development PREZ PREZ X The City has approved a Master
.1 M Agreement as a format for all future ANNE ANNE Development Agreement.
development agreements REZO REZO
22 4C P Place a planned development district overlay PREZ PREZ X This project includes a rezone to a PD
L zone on the entire planning area. and will therefore meet the intent of
4C.
24 7A P Establish Design Review guidelines and PREZ SDR X The City s Site Development Review
L procedures and assign review responsibilities ANNE Guidelines follows procedures identified
for projects proposed in eastern Dublin. REZO in this action when reviewing Planned
_Developments and SDR Applications.
25 7B P Require development applicants to submit, at a PREZ SDR X These requirements are part of the
L minimum, the following materials for review: REZO application requirements for Planned
Existing Condition Map(s), Design Concepts, Developments.
Site Plans (Preliminary & Final), Building
Design, and Special Concerns.
28 11.0 P Require more specific Planned Development (PD) PREZ TMAP X This project includes a PD Rezone and
2.07 L plans: Designs, sequencing, mitigation REZO SDR the applicant was required to submit
measures, etc. specific information as required for
that type of application.
3
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
rtT2' 401 L ;01 28 447TX0. ak MEABORE BTARg ENO + A Ae. ON;TISTCE.0 CaOD CO?fP7,$TAi'13
NO MEM PROG' S R t S tom.
MG NO A T 24
k� T3 A
29 11.2 P Require infrastructure sequencing program as PREZ TRAP X The development agreement and
.10 W part of Public Improvement Plans to allow ANNE SDR improvement plans will contain the
orderly development throughout Specific Plan REZO sequencing program.
area. Road, sewer, water, drainage and other
utilities shall be prioritized and in place
( prior to specific levels of development.
31 4D P Promote development agreements to ensure that PREZ TRAP X The project includes a development
L project is consistent with Specific Plan ANNE SDR agreement
policies and land use program. REZO
35 4A P Require applicants to demonstrate that proposed PREZ TRAP X The written statement and proposal
L developments are in conformance with the ANNE SDR include information that indicates the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan policies and Land REZO project is in conformance with the
Use program. Specific Plan
36 5D P Establish a bicycle circulation system to help PREZ TRAP X X - A bike lane will be provided on Dublin
W serve the need for nonmotorized transportation ANNE SDR Boulevard. Adequate setback areas are
and recreation in Dublin. REZO provided along the Creek for a future
trail. A condition will require bicycle
parking facilities at the Project.
37 5C P Require applicants to submit a detailed PREZ TRAP X The PD Rezone & SDR will include review
W pedestrian circulation plan. The plan shall ANNE SDR of pedestrian transit facilities along
include the following components: Tassajara REZO Dublin Blvd. The Creek is not a part of
Creek Trail, Staging Area and Trailheads and this project but buildings will be
sidewalks. setback 150' from the Creek to allow for
future trail design.
38 5E P Revise the City's existing zoning ordinance as PREZ TRAP X The project includes a PD Rezone which
5F L needed to allow flexible parking standards in ANNE SDR establishes specific parking standards
eastern Dublin. REZO for this project.
39 9S P Require the siting of wastewater system PREZ TRAP X Write condition of approval.
L infrastructure to be consistent with the ANNE SDR
Resource Management Policies of the Specific REZO
Plan.
40 9F P Require the siting of water system PREZ TRAP X Condition that infrastructure conforms
L infrastructure to be consistent with the ANNE SDR to policies.
Resource Management Policies of the Specific REZO
Plan. _
41 9V P Coordinate modifications or enhancements to PREZ TRAP X Any modifications to the Creek will be
L creeks or the abutting riparian areas with the ANNE SDR required to go through the appropriate
• required permitting agencies as necessary. REZO permitting agencies.
4
. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
• FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
` 4I'1` ACT. :;AM WEAT I$ AG'.Pj;ON OR MEA9'CFA$ i STAR$ AND " C i4.i EninnileggliAMMOTWOMINMEMEMMOL'ONj. C0K0a.::Ej3
NW MEM .FROG E g } $.
fiinaZ MO NO 1x N
D 3 j3 Pili
42 9X P Require the siting of storm drainage PREZ TMAP X Storm drainage infrastructure shall be
L infrastructure be consistent with the Resource ANNE SDR designed in conjunction with Zone 7 and
Management policies of the Specific Plan. REZO will be consistent with these policies.
Zone 7 is a reviewing agency.
44 03.01 C Resolve potential land use conflicts between CONT CONT X The City is doing all items on a
/01.0 M activities at Camp Parks and proposed uses in continuous basis.
the Project area.
a. Establish a liaison committee between
the City and the Army.
b. Establish a schedule for periodic
meetings to discuss and provide
updates on planning and development
efforts within the Project site and in
Camp Parks.
c. Provide the base commander with a copy
of new development applications
adjacent to Camp Parks for review and
comment.
45 03.03 P Caltrans in cooperation with local TMAP BLDP X Traffic study will examine this issue.
/01.0 W jurisdictions could construct auxiliarry lanes SDR Payment of fee will be made a condition
on 1-580 between Tassajara Road and Fallon Road of approval.
to provide a total of 10 lanes in that section,
consistent with the Caltrans Route Concept
Report for 1-580.
47 03.03 P Assist in the funding of improvements to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/02.1 W regional transportation system. SDR for payment of fee.
48 03.03 P Assist in funding the construction of auxiliary TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/03.0 W lanes on I580 between Tassajara and Airway ' SDR for payment of fee.
boulevards.
49 03.03 P Establish funding for construction of future TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/04.0 W I580/ I680 Interchange improvements. SDR _for payment of fee.
50 03.03 P Establish funding for construction of auxiliary TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/05.0 W lanes on I-580 east of Airway Blvd. SDR for payment of fee.
51 03.03 P Ensure the funding and construction of TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/06.0 W improvements to the Dougherty Road/ Dublin SDR CONT for payment of fee.
Blvd. intersection as needed.
5
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
T1 lf�� 1SC1.: L N ES T AG XQ OR MEASifRE $TART : RN17 3 A A S oN; AKLN cos CD2 L T 13 is
Np MEAS PRnG $ R 0 S Nis
NO. NQ. A O N A
k D 1 A F:
52 03.03 P Provide improvements that will prevent TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/07.0 W congestion on the eastbound offramps from I580 SDR for payment of fee.
at Hacienda Drive.
53 03.03 P Fund and implement improvements necessary to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/08.0 W ensure the efficient operation of the SDR for payment of fee.
intersection of Tassajara Road with the 1580
westbound ramps.
54 03.03 P Fund and implement improvements necessary to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/09.0 W ensure adequate service levels on Santa Rita SDR for payment of fee.
Road and 1580 eastbound ramps.
55 03.03 P Airway Boulevard and Dublin Boulevard. The TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/10.0 W City of Dublin shall implement improvements in SDR for payment of fee.
coordination with the City of Livermore to
modify the intersection to provide three
through lanes and a right-turn lane eastbound,
and two left-turn lanes and two through lanes
westbound. The Project shall constribute a
proportionate share of the improvement costs as
determined by a regional transportation study
such as the current study by the Tri-Valley
Transportation Council. These improvements
would provide LOS C conditions.
56 03.03 P Fund and implement improvements necessary to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/11.0 W ensure adequate service levels at the SDR for payment of fee.
intersection of Airway Blvd. and the westbound
ramps.
57 03.03 P Fund and implement improvements necessary to TMAP BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/12.0 W ensure unimpeded movement of trucks to and from SDR for payment of fee.
the quarries on El Charro Road south of I-580.
6
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
2 '. NET ! AO1.z L WAA1 f5 $CT oN Alt 14EASTlR6 811iRT 1.50 ? A AcT:!O � i#N12' CDDtPI 11lES3
NO MEAS PROO $
Nb. NO. t o N A
58 03.03 P Cumulative impacts on Dublin Boulevard. The CONT BLDP X Part of traffic study and requirement
/13.0 W City of Dublin shall continue to participate in TRAP CONT for payment of fee.
regional studies of future transportation SDR
requirements, improvement alternatives and
funding programs, such as the current study by
the Tri-Valley Transportation Council.
Buildout of development outside of Eastern
Dublin beyond 2010 levels would require the
construction of grade-separated interchanges on
Dublin Boulevard and/or establishment of
alternative routes to redistribute traffic
flow. The project shall participate in the
implementation and funding of regional
transportation improvement programs as
determined by these regional studies.
59 03.03 P Reserve sufficient right of way along Tassajara TMAP FMAP X Part of traffic study and requirement to
/14.0 W Road to accommodate cumulative development of SDR BLDP pay fee
projects north of the Project area.
60 03.03 P Extend transit service within 1/4 mile of 95% PREZ CONT X The City needs to coordinate and meet
/15.0 W of the Project area population. 1994 with LAVTA.
61 03.03 P Provide transit service, at a minimum frequency REZO CONT X The City needs to coordinate and meet
/15.1 W of one bus every 30 minutes during peak hours, SDR with LAVTA.
to employment centers with 100 or more
employees.
62 03.03 P Provide funding in support of expansion of TMAP FMAP X Staff needs to contact the transit
/15.2 L transit service to the Project area. SDR authority regarding possible
participation by the developer.
63 03.03 P Coordinate provision of feeder bus service to PREZ CONT X The City needs to coordinate and meet
/15.3 W the planned BART stations from the Project 1994 with LAVTA.
area.
64 03.03 P Provide a paved Class I bicycle/ pedestrian TMAP FMAP X To be contained in Development Agreement
/16.0 L path along Tassajara Creek. SDR BLDP for county to provide at the time of
development of east side of Creek.
65 03.03 P Provide for safe pedestrian/ bicycle crossings TRAP FMAP X Will be required if determined necessary
/16.1 W of major arterial streets. SDR BLDP as part of SDR process.
66 03.04 P Provide additional personnel, facilities, and PREZ CONT X A fiscal analysis is being prepared and
/01.0 0 procedures to PD service standards. its recommendations will be implemented
as conditions of the project.
7
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
S MXTf€ ACT.;< i. WHAT S6 THL AC"tx4N Olt l4gAAR$4 BVART; END A; AGTzoN TAREH O CO A4T.AO is
44WHAM*01400404NUMONOMMOMMONROMMUMENEEMENNEOMMEMMENAIWAHAVERNEMEMBEMEMMENNEEMEMMMRENUMMEN
MR NO. J; 0. ANNEMEMBEMBEREMENOWENEEMBEMENENN AR Ai memsommommasammummosomm am amememem
mgmfigmthmimggtoukgmmgmmgnwommg&amzsoomsnudmmammlmgsgIsugammwto3cmmmaEmnmNlgsgg5gggmamgngogmgmmmmmmgwamzottwplm
67 03.04 8D P Provide the PD Dept. information needed to PREZ CONT X The Dublin Police Department is the
/02.0 0 adequately plan for expansion of services. ANNE reviewing agency for this project.
Coordinate with the City PD Department Additionally, a fiscal analysis was
regarding the timing of annexation and proposed prepared and its recommendations will be
development, so that the Department can made conditions of the project approval.
( adequately plan for the necessary expansion of
services to the area.
68 03.04 P Provide for PD Dept. input into the design of TMAP FMAP X Police Dept. is a reviewing agency on
/03.0 0 proposed development. SDR BLDP the project.
69 03.04 P Prepare a budget strategy to hire the required CONT CONT X A fiscal analysis was prepared and its
/04.0 0 additional personnel and implement necessary recommendations will be made conditions
changes in the "beat" system. of project approval.
70 03.04 8E P Ensure PD Dept. review of proposed development TMAP BLDP X The Police Dept. should review items in
/05.0 0 for safety issues. Incorporate into the SDR DEIR and make sure that they comment on
requirements of project approval PD Dept. those specific items as well as their
recommendations on project design that affect usual areas. Need a letter from the
traffic safety and crime prevention. Police specifically saying they are
reviewing items 3.4/5.0
71 03.04 F Provide for the construction of new fire TMAP FI/0 X X Require condition for provision of fire
/06.0 R facilities coincident with new service demand SDR service to the project. Enter into an
in eastern Dublin. agreement with Alameda County for
interim fire facility on the Santa Rita
Property.
73 03.04 8G F Ensure acquisition of sites for construction of TMAP FI/0 X X Condition requiring fire service to the
/08.0 R new fire stations. SDR site. Additionally, staff needs to work
with District on provision of station
site.
74 03.04 8H F Ensure DRFA input on project design relating to TMAP SDR X X Part of project review process.
/09.0 R access, water pressure, fire safety and SDR FMAP Condition assuring compliance with DRFA
prevention. requirements.
75 03.04 F Ensure that a mechanism is in place to provide TMAP FMAP X Mechanisms shall be in place to provide
/10.0 R long term maintenance for safe fire conditions SDR BLDP regular long-term maintenance of the
along the urban/open space interface. urban/open space interface
76 03.04 8J F Integrate fire trails and fire breaks into the TMAP FMAP X Condition that access road be required
/11.0 R open space trail system. SDR BLDP to DRFA standards. Needs will be
a. Meet fire district standards for access determined during SDR, fire authority is
roads in the open space trail system while part of review process.
_ minimizing environmental impacts.
8
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
Y 1TT ACT : L WHAT TS.TIE AG"n(3Pi ctR NA`ASUkE A3`A;IT RNLI C A' ACTION 4A COMP.2,0,
NO. MERS'. PBOG N R I
77 03.04 F Prepare a wildfire management plan for the PREZ BLDP X The fire district reviewes at the time
/12.0 R Project area in order to reduce the risk of ANNE of Site Development Review and comments
impact related to wild land fire on each project. At that time a plan is
prepared by the district on a project by
_ project basis as needed.
'8 03.04 F Determine the number, location and timing of PREZ BLDP X Fire protection for the project area and
/13.0 R additional fire stations for areas within the ANNE other surrounding areas are being
Project area yet outside the Specific Plan area analyzed as part of the project's fiscal
analysis. A condition for provision of
fire service will be required.
83 03.04 P Ensure that adequate school facilities are REZO CONT X DUSD is a reviewing agency on this
/17.0 L available prior to development in the Project project.They have indicated that the
area to the extent permitted by law. Sterling Fee will adequately mitigate
impacts from this development. Need
condition requiring payment of fees.
84 03.04 8B P Ensure that the development of new school TMAP FMAP X Condition of approval to pay Sterling
/18.0 L facilities is provided for through the SDR BLDP fees (letter from DUSD indicated those
dedication of school sites and/ or payment of fees would provide all needed mitigation
development fees by developers, or by any other from this project.)
mean permitted by law.
86 03.04 R Expand park area throughout the Primary and CONT CONT X X The Public Facilities Fee Study will
/20.0 E Extended Planning Areas to serve new examine the impacts on parkland and
development. whether this project should participate
in acquiring , improving or maintaining
them. If applicable, these issues will
be negotiated in a development agreement
and this will be made a condition of
approval.
87 03.04 R Maintain and improve outdoor facilities in CONT CONT X X The Public Facilities Fee Study will
/21.0 E conformance with the recommendations of the examine the impacts on parkland and
City's Park and recreation Master Plan 1992. whether this project should participate
in acquiring, improving or maintaining
them. If applicable, these issues will
be negotiated in a development agreement
and this will be made a condition of
approval.
9
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
1XVRkIT ACT. L vTliA 26 T AC' r3N CN Mk,'1SS2t START AWE P C A ACTT4N:",C;M,N L'OMPl',Z,TV
10.0**1400114ffEWORIRMIERUMOMMERUMEMPRUMMAIIROMIWaRgaREMNEID4HPUOMEgglIMgMINSINEgggONMEggglggnInfigIMMInAOMEMIONMEM
annalfogummoomANAMMUNRIERINgMEUNggMEMWMNIMUtglaggWINOURMUNBIoulWAHONWANUMMIggtNUSIONMMINWIRTRUINBIESOURAERMegaRgME
MMEN ••0•H•g•i))-1
88 03.04 R Provide active parks and facilities which are ICONT CONT X X The Public Facilities Fee Study will
/22.0 E adequate to meet citywide needs for open space, examine the impacts on parkland and
cultural, and sports facilities, as well as the whether this project should participate
local needs of the Eastern Extended Planning in acquiring, improving or maintaining
Area. them. If applicable, these issues will
be negotiated in a development agreement
and this will be made a condition of
approval.
89 03.04 R Acquire and improve parklands in conformance CONT CONT X X The Public Facilities Fee Study will
/23.0 E with the priorities and phasing recommended in examine the impacts on parkland and
the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. whether this project should participate
in acquiring, improving or maintaining
them. If applicable, these issues will
be negotiated in a development agreement
and this will be made a condition of
approval.
90 03.04 P Require land dedication and improvements for 'TMAP FMAP X No dedication will be required of this
/24.0 L the 25 parks s designated in the General Plan applicant, however, improvement needs
Amendment (GPA) and collect in lieu fees per will be addressed thorugh the Public
City standard. Facilities Fee Study which is being
prepared by the City. Idenfitied needs
will be negotiated in the development
agreement and this will be made a
condition of approval.
( 94 03.04 P Ensure the provision of open space, access and TMAP FMAP X Include provision in Development
/28.0 L areas for public recreation. Agreement regarding dedication of the
stream corridor at the time the eastern
side of creek develops. This will be a
condition of approval.
95 03.04 P Ensure that each new development reserves the TMAP FMAP X Requirement for development agreement so
/29.0 L open space and parkland designated in the Plan. that County will dedicate open space
area at time of development of east
parcel. Also Tassajara Creek is not a
part of the project but adequate
setbacks have been designated to reserve
open space. This will be made a
condition of approval.
10
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
I'1 MZT AC'1" i, WtfkT TS T liCt..Ulfi.msA9URik STAIN AND p s A ACTION S'AtCLN OO •Pt$
NO MEI%6 PROCr E x'a S Nt3•
100 03.04 P Establish a continuous open space network that TMAP FMAP X Established in the Specific Plan and
/34.0 L integrates large natural open space areas, SDR BLDP Parks Master Plan. Need provision in
stream corridors, and developed parks and the development agreement for dedication
recreation areas. of steam corridor. This will be made a
condition of approval.
01 03.04 P Provide convenient pedestrian connections TMAP FMAP X Contact EBRPD regarding staging areas
/35.0 L between developed areas and designated open SDR BLDP for Tassajara Creek Trail.
space areas and trails.
102 03.04 40 P Require developers to dedicate public access TMAP FMAP X Include provisions in the development
/36.0 L easements along ridge tops and stream corridors SDR BLDP agreement for dedication of stream
to accommodate the development of trails and corridor.
staging areas.
103 03.04 8K C Prepare a Solid Waste Management Plan for 1995/ BLDP X X Prepare SWMP update for Eastern Dublin.
/37.0 M Eastern Dublin, meeting the requirements of the 1996 This project will not exceed thresholds
adopted City SRRE, which includes: of current SRRE. Therefore, preparation
1. A requirement for the City to compost all of an update prior to project approval
organic wastes resulting from the ongoing is not necessary. Require condition of
maintenance of public parkis and open space. approval to ensure compliance with
2. extension of Dublin's curbside recycling requirements of the SWMP and SRRE .
program for recyclable materials.
3. Specific areas designated for the
collection of recyclable materials in multi-
family and commercial areas, with coordination
as needed for pick-up.
4. Support for re-use of composted materials
in landscaped areas of all new development.
106 03.04 C Ensure that adequate landfill capacity is TMAP FMAP X Require will serve letter
/40.0 M available to accommodate project waste. SDR BLDP _
107 03.04 8L P Have project applicants provide documentation REZO FMAP X Require will serve letter.
/41.0 L that electric, gas, and telephone service can TMAP BLDP
be provided to all new development.
108 03.04 P Require all utilities be located below grade SLOP FI/0 X X Write condition, also City should begin
/42.0 W where feasible and designed to City standards. contacting major utilities regarding
their master plans for the area.
109 03.04 P Work with PG&E to plan the undergrounding of SDR FMAP X Staff needs to begin meetings with PG&E
/43.0 W all new electric lines and to route BLDP regarding provision of utilities and
infrastructure away from sensitive habitat and their location in relation to this
open space lands to mitigate the effects of mitigation measure.
utilities expansion.
11
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
$iirViR il.01Vggni: ACfi L (WBAT IS fi$L AC°I'IDN t. I....:. 5 STAkfi LN1! P C A;� A '1QN r`AREM CONY} OUMP$E'P14`A
)9 MEASi. PROC R 5 S NO.
Nfl ..0. A 5 A
110 03.04 P Require project applicants to submit a FMAP BLDP X Need condition.
/44.0 L utilities service report to the City prior to
Public Improvement Plan approval. -
111 03.04 P Require the installation of a demonstration TMAP FI/0 X Require project to use energy
/45.0 L project(s) of cost effective energy SDR conservation techniques as identified in
conservation techniques. building code. Also, encourage other
_ energy saving techniques.
112 03.04 P Require developers to demonstrate the TMAP BLDP X X Part of project review will be to
/46.0 L incorporation of energy conservation measures SDR analyze these issues and require
into the design, construction, and operation of compliance with current energy
proposed development. _ _ standards.
115 03.04 R Encourage and support the efforts of the PREZ FMAP X City needs to write a letter.
/49.0 E Alameda County Library System to establish a ANNE BLDP
library(ies) and associated services for REZO
Eastern Dublin as determined to be appropriate
given the size and population of the planning
area.
116 03.04 8N R Coordinate with Alameda County to provide PREZ FMAP X City needs to write a letter.
/50.0 E library services to Eastern Dublin. ANNE BLDP
REZO _
117 03.04 R Require the City Library Task Force identify PREZ FMAP X The project is not in a site that was
/51.0 E appropriate location and timing for development ANNE BLDP identified as a possible library
of new library(ies). REZO location in the Specific Plan. However,
the City need to begin working with the
/ task force in this area.
1 118 03.05 9Q P Require that all development within the TMAP FMAP X Need will serve letter and condition
/01.0 W Specific Plan be connected to public sewers. SDR BLDP that the project be connected. DSRSD
Exceptions to this requirement, in particular Code prohibits the use of septic or non-
septic tank systems, will only be allowed on a public sewer systems for any commercial
case by case basis upon receipt of written project (per Letter to The City of
approval from Alameda County Environmental Dublin dated November 3, 1994).
Health Dept. and DSRSD.
12
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
IEO1!!TSMAgtWlaIV444SgWAPTXPWPWMAAPPWMEMIRMggSgUVATAMRAOPMPAMOEMMEIMMIAgTXPWM*WMNMOWN6OEURqNRHVWP4OWRm
.,R.!lltkqAFPITW091!gOROMMWMNONUBMNWMERENEMNUMEMMRMMZMMEMMEIREiginiAinigMnnininBMMMMEMMMMMEMMigilWgEMMMEMg
Imm44;qm*tagNICM MANWOMMORNMEMMOMMONNOMANNEEM MESEENNAlgIC WEREMOMMOMMEREMOMEMMEROMMEMPUMORMONE
119 03.05 9J P Have DSRSD update its wastewater collection PREZ TMAP X X DSRSD has already prepared the Eastern
/02.0 W system master plan computer model to reflect ANNE SDR Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
the adopted Specific Plan/GPA. Projects must REZO dated December, 1993, (Dodson and
Associates) to provide the updated
pay for design level wastewater collection
system master plan computer model. (ARIII, P. computer simulations and master plan
819) analyses for wastewater collection and
potable and recycled water systems.
Alameda County funded the Dodson Study
in part.Applicant shall install required
facilities as a condition of approval.
120 03.05 9P P Discourage the use of onsite package plants and CONT TMAP X Project will be required to hook into
/03.0 W septic systems within the Project area in SDR public utilities and water/wastewater
accordance with policies of the San Francisco systems.
Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board.
121 03.05 9N P Wastewater. Require a "will serve" letter from TMAP FMAP X Conditions regarding provision of will
/04.0 W DSRSD prior to permit approval for grading. SDR GRAD serve letters for wastewater.
122 03.05 90 P Require design and construction of all BLDP FI/0 X Standard condition regarding approval by
/05.0 W wastewater systems to be in accordance with DSRSD of wastewater systems.
DSRSD service policies, procedures, design and
construction standards and master plans. _
124 03.05 9M P Require project applicants to prepare detailed TMAP FMAP X Need to require from applicant as part
/07.0 W wastewater capacity investigations, including SDR of the tentative map conditions of
means to minimize wastewater flows, to approval.
supplement the information in the Specific
Plan.
125 03.05 P TWA. Require a "will serve" letter from DSRSD TMAP FMAP X Conditions regarding provision of will
/07.1 W prior to permit approval for grading. SDR GRAD serve letters for wastewater service via
TWA.
126 03.05 P Ensure that wastewater treatment and disposal PREZ TMAP X Require a will serve letter.
/08.0 W facilities are available to meet the needs of ANNE SDR
future development in eastern Dublin. REZO
13
•
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
f��, M�.T ACS.` L Lf1HAT �S ' ACTION ZlR ME`,1SSURE $TA3i't LND P O (A AGTYON AKEN OMk+,E 13
NO. NCR. A <Ca H A
127 03.05 P Ensure that proposed development is consistent TMAP FMAP X A will serve letter will be required to
/09.0 W with wastewater treatment plant expansion as SDR BLDP ensure this. Additionally, DSRSD is a
set forth in DSRSD's master plan. reviewing agency on the project. No
expansion of the DSRSD wastewater
treatment plant is necessary to
accommodate this project (per letter to
The City of Dublin from DSRSD dated
November 3, 1994).
129 03.05 9I C Support LAVWMA and DSRSD in their current CONT TMAP X Need to write letters.
/11.0 M efforts to implement a new wastewater export SDR
pipeline system.
130 03.05 P Require recycled water use or landscape TMAP CONT X Condition re: recycled water in
/12.0 W irrigation in accordance with DSRSD's Recycled SDR landscaping plan - provide for
Water Policy per AR III pg. 821. infrastructure in improvement plans.
131 03.05 9K P Require development within this project to fund PREZ TMAP X DSRSD has already prepared the Eastern
/13.0 W a recycled water distribution system computer ANNE SDR Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
model to reflect the adopted Specific Plan/ REZO dated December, 1993, (Dodson and
GPA. (ARIII, P. 821) Associates) to provide the updated
computer simulations and master plan
analyses for wastewater collection and
potable and recycled water systems.
Alameda County funded the Dodson Study
in part. Applicant shall install
required facilities as a condition of
approval.
_32 03.05 9L P Support the efforts of the Tri Valley Water PREZ CONT X X Condition re: recycled water in project.
/14.0 W Recycling Task Force Study through Zone 7, ANNE Also write letter to Zone 7.
encouraging wastewater recycling and reuse for REZO
landscape irrigation.
138 03.05 P Require that construction of the recycled water TBD TBD X Need to write condition.
/20.0 W distribution system be in accordance with all
applicable State and local regulations.
14
•
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
T MlT ACT.:. I. WHAx S6 THE ACTTc i“0 ASaR$ . &TART EN37
NU, M$AS, I'12L1Cx: $
NO NO a N A
139 03.05 P Ensure that reservoir construction meets all TBD TBD X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of
/21.0 W applicable standards of DSRSD and appropriate Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that in
health agencies. accordance with the Policy on Major
Infrastructure adopted by the District,
all major facilites are designed and
built by the District and thus will
adhere to all District standards. All
health standard will be required to be
met.
140 03.05 P Require the proposed recycled water pump TBD TBD X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of
/22.0 W stations meet to meet all applicable standards Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that as
of DSRSD. AR III pg. 823. the owner and operator of all on and oo-
site recycled water facilities needed
for this project, the District will
ensure that all such facilities shll
meet all applicable standards.
141 03.05 P Ensure that recycled water projects meet any TBD TBD X Staff will work with Zone 7 when they
/23.0 W applicable salt mitigation requirements of Zone begin design of any recycled water
7. project for this area. Staff should
write letter.
142 03.05 P Expand DSRSD service boundaries to encompass PREZ TMAP X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of
/24.0 W the entire eastern Dublin Specific Plan/ GPA ANNE SDR Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that the
area. REZO project site is already located within
the District boundaries.
f 1.43 03.05 P Encourage all development in the Project area TMAP FMAP X Condition for provision of will serve
/25.0 W to connect to the DSRSD water system. SDR BLDP letter.
144 03.05 9A P Require water conservation measures to be TMAP FMAP X Require water conservation methods
/26.0 W designed into individual projects. SDR BLDP identified in DEIR & FEIR be
incorporated into project per City Water
Conservation Ordinance.
145 03.05 P Require a recycled water distribution system be TMAP FMAP X Write condition regarding DSRSD comment
/27.0 W incorporated into individual projects. SDR BLDP letter.
146 03.05 9B P Ensure that Zone 7 has water supply needed to TMAP FMAP X Require will serve letter. Get copy of
/28.0 W meet requirements of the Project. SDR BLDP contract or letter from Zone 7 regarding
contract for file.
15
•
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
2T: MIT ACT.:.. L WHAT 2S TML 14TX$ 4 NPAORC ATAn f€] :P C A; AGT10bt;1'AM CRSB CDMPS,5 13 _:
Wei*VOCgii00404MMEMENEEEMMEMMEMBEREMEMEEMBEWEEMICW4EMMEMEREMEMEMEMERESIMISEENEWNMEETNETEMBE
anM)WagAOOVNNAaeEEEMEBMagngKBMN9MEgEMMMMEgnWggSMMWWWWNEMMMWgNMMMMEWgmmMagMMgumgmomnummgugom
MUMMEMUMWOMMYMMEMMONMNOMMEMENEMMOIMEMMNEEMMWMMEWwoxiAMMOMMOMMEMOMMOMMOMONm4MMORMOMMERBM.
148 03.05 P Provide for increased water source reliability, CONT CONT X Plans submitted by DSRSD indicate design
/30.0 W the Project water system should be is in accordance with this mitigation
interconnected with existing adjoining systems. measure. DSRSD will construct
facilities recommended by the Dodson
study. May need a condition regarding
an easement across Homart property along
Tassajara Creek and I-580 per DSRSD
comment letter.
149 03.05 P Provide a backup source of water supply to its TBD TBD X DSRSD stated in a letter to The City of
/31.0 W Zone 7 source. DSRSD will reimburse City of Dublin dated November 3, 1994, that it
Pleasanton for construction and operation of acknowledges that the backup water
new groundwater wells south of the Project area supply source is desireable for ultimate
build-out of the Specific Plan area.
The scope of this project, however, does
not warrant a backup supply source from
outside the District service area. The
District has recently signed a new water
supply contract with Zone 7 which
specifies the Zone will provide all wter
requested for the Specific Plan Area
within the constraints of its ability to
do so. The Distric does not currently
anticipate obtaining any water supply
from the City of Pleasanton's well
project referenced in the Mitigation
Measure. The District anticipated=s
providing significant amounts of
recycled water to landscaping
improvements to this and future projects
in the area.
150 03.05 P Establish a phasing for water treatment system TBD TBD X Check with Zone 7 re: status of phasing
/32.0 W improvements to meet increasing demands on its plan listed in DEIR. Staff should write
water system. letter.
151 03.05 P Require DSRSD construction of two new TBD TBD X Write status letter on western turnout
/33.0 W chlorination/ fluoridation stations at the two and chlorination/fluoridation station
proposed Zone 7 turnouts to eastern Dublin to status to DSRSD and Zone 7
meet increased demand resulting from the
project.
16
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
i lf2T ro i' t PiHAx IB ACM ok ME SORE ; 8 AR4 , $PFD P 1 A.k; A tfN;TAKEN cON tAft4%.4 D
NEB N.`A9.+ PRGG; E it' (S S NO
NO. NO : A t? 1'F A
152 03.05 P Provide an adequate water supply system and TMAP GRAD X Require will serve letter. DSRSD is
/34.0 W related improvements and storage facilities for SDR BLDP currently completing an engineering
all new development in the Project area. analysis of interim water distribution
and storage alternatives to adequately
supply the proposed project while
providing facilities which can be
incorporated successfully into the
ultimate system required to accommodatd
build-out of the Santa Rita area and
adjacent properties. The results of
this analysis will indicate any required
storage facilities which will become
requirements of the provision of
service. At this time DSRSD states that
it does not appear that new storage
facilities will be necessary for this
development. The existing Zone 7
turnout to Alameda County will be
utilized (per letter to The City of
Dublin from DSRSD dated November 3,
1994).
153 03.05 9C P Ensure that DSRSD updates its water system PREZ TMAP X X DSRSD has already prepared the Eastern
/35.0 W master plan computer model to reflect the ANNE SDR Dublin Facilities Plan, Final Report,
adopted Specific Plan/GPA land uses. REZO dated December, 1993, (Dodson and
Development must pay cost. Associates) to provide the updated
computer simulations and master plan
analyses for wastewater collection and
potable and recycled water systems.
-Alameda County funded the Dodson Study
in part. Applicant shall install
required facilities as a condition of
approval.
154 03.05 P Consolidate the Camp Parks and Alameda County CONT CONT X Plans submitted by DSRSD indicate
/36.0 W water systems and turnouts with the DSRSD compliance with this mitigation measure.
system.
155 03.05 P Require that design and construction of all TMAP FMAP X Write condition regarding approval by
/37.0 W water system facility improvements be in SDR BLDP DSRSD regarding water system.
accordance with DSRSD standards.
17
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
TT. MYT ACT., L WH SS .AT ACTION UN. .10±At9V$E TAR4` :ENC, P ?c X3.. AGT1ON AI;$1 C 111 4144.4T
NO. MEAS PROG; R 0 S Nj.
H.N.P. A.0 .Ak::. %. :::' .. :. ;: . ONA% '
156 03.05 9H P Water. Require a "will serve" letter from TMAP FMAP X Conditions regarding provision of will
/38.0 W DSRSD prior to permit approval for grading. SDR GRAD serve letters for fresh water.
162 03.05 P Provide drainage facilities that will minimize TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding compliance as part
/44.0 W any increased potential for erosion or SDR BLDP of grading plan.
_flooding.
163 03.05 P Require channel improvements consisting of TMAP FMAP X Condition in the event of alteration to
/45.0 W natural creek bottoms and side slopes with SDR BLDP the Creek.
natural vegetation where possible. _
164 03.05 9T P Require the preparation of a Master Drainage TMAP FMAP X County is preparing.
/46.0 W Plan for each development. SDR BLDP
165 03.05 9U P Require Project area development to provide TMAP FMAP X Part of Master Drainage Plan.
/47.0 W facilities to alleviate potential downstream SDR BLDP
flooding due to Project area development.
166 03.05 P Require the construction of the backbone TMAP FMAP X Need condition.
/48.0 W drainage facilities to be consistent with the SDR BLDP
Storm Drainage Master Plan.
167 03.05 P Plan facilities and management practices that TMAP FMAP X Zone 7, DSRSD & City Public Works will
/49.0 W protect and enhance water quality. SDR BLDP monitor this requirement through project
review.
168 03.05 P Protect groundwater resources with Zone 7's TMAP FMAP X Write letter to Zone 7
/50.0 W support for an ongoing groundwater recharge SDR BLDP
program for the Central Basin.
169 03.05 P Water Quality Investigation. Require a TMAP FMAP X X Require applicant to prepare
( /51.0 W specific water quality investigation be SDR BLDP investigation and submit as soon as
submitted with each development application to possible. Conditons may be required
demonstrate existing water quality and impacts depending on results of the
that urban runoff would have. The water investigation.
quality investigation should address the
quantity of runoff and the effects form
discharged pollutants from surface runoff into
creeks and detention facilities.
170 03.05 P Develop community based programs to educate TMAP CONT X Staff already conducts these programs.
/52.0 W local residents and businesses on methods to SDR
reduce nonpoint sources of pollution, and
coordinate such programs with current Alameda
County programs.
18
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
_ FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
I M12 Aox. L 'WHAx IB THE ACTXPA €11!Mt;A90RN 1 8'1'ART <:Enka + A AGT14N:: A[Et9 edNII 4 S1.1,NTED
N9. $ms.1 RDI¢' R 0 $ Nt3.
Nt7. N0. A 47 N A
D S 7i P
171 03.05 P Require all development to meet the requirement TMAP BLDP X Need condition.
/53.0 W of the City of Dublin's "Best Management SDR
Practices" to mitigate storm water pollution.
172 03.05 P Require all development to meet the water TMAP BLDP X Need condition.
/54.0 W quality requirements of the City of Dublin's SDR
NPDES permit.
.73 03.05 P Require all development to meet the water TMAP BLDP X Need condition.
/55.0 W quality requirements of the Alameda County SDR
Urban Runoff Clean Water Program.
174 03.06 B Require the use of modern seismic design in TMAP FMAP X Write standard condition
/01.0 L construction of development projects, and build SDR BLDP
in accordance with Uniform Building code and
applicable county and city code requirements. _
175 03.06 B Provide setbacks from or modification of TMAP FMAP X Need condition regarding results of
/02.0 L unstable and potentially unstable landforms, SDR BLDP geotechnical report may require revision
and use of appropriate design to ensure seismic to site plan.
safety.
179 03.06 P Design roads, structural foundations, and TMAP FMAP X Write condition regarding geotechnical
/06.0 W underground utilities to accommodate estimated SDR BLDP report and stock pond removal.
settlement without failure, especially across
transitions between fills and cuts, and to
remove or reconstruct potentially unstable
stock pond embankments in development areas. _
180 03.06 P Require all development projects in the Project TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding geotechnical report
/07.0 W area to perform design level geotechnical SDR BLDP which is requirement of tentative map
investigations prior to issuing any permits. submittal.
181 03.06 C Provide for the development of earthquake 1995 FMAP X Responsibility of the City to prepare
/08.0 M preparedness plans and the dissemination of BLDP and distribute per DEIR. Need to
appropriate emergency measures to all Project prepare.
residents and employees. _
184 03.06 P Prepare detailed design level geotechnical TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding geotechnical report
/11.0 W investigations on development sites within the SDR BLDP which is requirement of tentative map
Project area, to locate and characterize submittal.
groundwater conditions and formulate design
criteria and measures to mitigate adverse
conditions.
-
19
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
' FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
% MY1 P.T.` 4 DiHAT I AC"VI{7N CJIA NF'A.52PRE BTAA END P C A; ACTION:TAN CONU Ci3MP E
NQ AS;s 0 +; 12 O 8 s Pal.
44. 10. A 0 N AV.
A A I*I
185 03.06 P Construct subdrain systems, drainage pipe and TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding findings of
/12.0 W permeable materials to reduce groundwater SDR BLDP geotechnical report, however, subdrains
impacts. are normally used in hillside
developments.
187 03.06 P Prepare design level geotechnical TMAP FMAP X Submittal of a geotechnical report
( /14.0 W investigations for development projects in the SDR BLDP required at Tentative Map application or
Project area to characterize site specific prior to grading and building permit
soils and bedrock conditions, and to formulate approval.
appropriate design criteria.
188 03.06 P Implement measures to control moisture in the TMAP BLDP X Condition may be required at Tentative
/15.0 W ground to reduce the potential for impact SDR Map after submittal of geotechnical
resulting from expansive soils and rock. report.
189 03.06 B Reduce the potential effects of expansive soil TMAP FMAP X Condition required at grading and
/16.0 L and rock through appropriate foundation and SDR BLDP building permit approval.
pavement design.
194 03.06 P Require grading plan and mitigation measure TMAP FMAP X Write standard condition.
/21.0 W compliance with the minimum requirements of the SDR SLOP
Uniform Building Code and applicable County and
City code requirements.
198 03.06 P Require that fill be engineered (compacted) to TMAP FMAP X Requirement of grading permit and soils
/25.0 W at least 90 percent relative compaction. SDR BLDP report.
200 03.06 P Require that grading activities be timed to FMAP BLDP X This is a requirement of the City's
/27.0 W avoid the rainy season as much as possible, and SDR Grading Ordinance. However, also write
that interim control measures be implemented to condition.
control runoff and reduce erosion potential.
( 202 03.07 P Ensure that direct disturbance or removal of TMAP FMAP X Condition regarding flood control
/01.0 L trees or native vegetation cover be minimized SDR BLDP improvements to the Creek and
and restricted to those areas actually revegetation.
designated for the construction of
improvements.
203 03.07 P Provide for the preparation of vegetation TMAP FMAP X X Need to prepare plan in coordination
/02.0 L enhancement/ management plans for all open SDR BLDP with BKF/ALACO study. May require
space areas (whether held publicly or condition for a project to ensure
privately) with the intent to enhance the conformity with study.
biologic potential of the area as wildlife
habitat.
i
20
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
. FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
I`:» M1.T ACT L WHAT IS T AG Tt N f;kk 1#'Pt5U1 :START <zNO P 14.; liGTI N WAKEN Y7ND OMti,IkT$O
NO FRS 'RQ E R f3 $ NO
Nt3. NO A 7 N A 1
204 03.07 60 P Require a detailed revegetation/ restoration SDR BLDP X Require fencing on eastern boundary of
/03.0 L plan be developed for all disturbed areas that FMAP site during construction and grading.
are to remain undeveloped. If area is disturbed also need condition
regarding revegetation.
206 03.07 P Ensure that all areas of disturbance be SDR BLDP X Require fencing on eastern boundary of
/ /05.0 L revegetated as quickly as possible to prevent FMAP site during construction and grading.
erosion. If area is disturbed also need condition
regarding revegetation.
207 03.07 P Require the preservation of natural stream PREZ FMAP X Any modification to Tassajara Creek for
/06.0 L corridors, ponds, springs, seeps, and wetland ANNE BLDP flood control purposes will be completed
areas wherever possible. REZO in a manner sensitive to its native
state.
208 03.07 P Require the incorporation of riparian and SDR BLDP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this
/07.0 L wetland areas into project open space areas, FMAP project. Need to check regarding
and ensure that loss of riparian or wetland drainage area adjacent the highway. Any
habitat be mitigated per Dept. of Fish & Game/ alteration or modification to Tassajara
Corps of Engineers. Creek will be approved through
appropriate federal and state agencies.
209 03.07 P Require all stream corridors be revegetated SDR BLDP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this
/08.0 L with native plant species to enhance their FMAP project. Should the Creek be modified
natural appearance and improve habitat values. or changed in any way, a revegetation
plan would be required, etc.
210 03.07 P Ensure storm runoff is carried in natural TMAP FMAP X The project site does not drain to
/09.0 W stream channels whenever possible, rather than SDR BLDP Tassajara Creek. However, as a
replacing with underground drainage systems preventative measure a condition will be
(Mit. Measure 3.7/9.0). ARII P. 584 - see for required that any modification to the
additional language re maintenance. Creek as a result of this project will
kick in these mitigation measures - need
conditions.
212 03.07 6E P Require all project applicants submit TMAP FMAP X Should any alterations be required to
/11.0 L multiparameter wetlands delineation to the COE SDR BLDP Tassajara Creek, the appropriate
for verification and jurisdictional agencies will be contacted for
establishment, and submit plans for proposed compliance with permitting requirements.
alteration to any watercourse to the DFG for The negative dec. will be circulated
their review and approval. through OPR.
•
21
. _ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
' FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
;14XCi :$It. ACT . L WHA't 2$ xHE AC tiYN ztR..... J $11 . EFh t.,!..11 L A 1x YON gAKgH Conks motmgvgimegg
(S9 M£RS: FRQG R t7 s Mt3.
NO NQ A N A
v A 3 3_
213 03.07 6F P Provide for the development of a comprehensive PREZ TMAP X X Although Tassajara Creek is not a part
/12.0 L stream corridor restoration program that ANNE SDR of this project, any modifications for
identifies a detailed set of criteria for REZO flood control will require this type of
grading, stabilization, and revegetation of restoration program. Begin preparation
planning area stream channels. of a program.
14 03.07 6G P Provide for the dedication of land and TMAP FMAP X The City will require as part of the
/13.0 L improvements (i.e., trails, revegetation, etc.) SDR BLDP development agreement that when the
along both sides of stream corridors as a parcel to the east develops, the County
condition of project approval. will establish a trail system and
dedicate it to the City or agency
designated by the City.
215 03.07 6H P Provide for the enactment of an erosion and PREZ TMAP X Need condition regarding this mitigation
/14.0 W sedimentation control ordinance establishing ANNE SDR measure. City has ordinance covering
performance standards to ensure maintenance of REZO this issue.
water quality and protection of stream
channels.
217 03.07 P Require sensitive habitat areas be avoided and TMAP FMAP X No sensitive habitats have been
/16.0 L protected wherever feasible. SDR BLDP identified on the project site. Require
fencing along eastern project boundary
during construction to protect Creek.
218 03.07 P Require construction near drainages take place TMAP FMAP X Modification or construction within 100'
/17.0 W during the dry season. SDR BLDP of stream bank needs to be in dry
season.
219 03.07 P Require all development in the Project area TMAP FMAP X The project env. is not associated with
/18.0 L comply with the Eastern Dublin San Joaquin Kit SDR BLDP Kit Fox dens. No kit foxes were
Fox Protection Plan. observed on the site during the Specific
Plan biological survey. Need condition
that should preconstruction survey
identify foxes, S.J. Kit Fox Protection
Plan will be followed.
220 03.07 P Provide for the cooperation between the City of 1994 CONT X The project site is flat and is not
/18.1 L Dublin and other appropriate agencies in the shown in the DEIR to be in an area where
preparation of a Kit Fox Habitat Management Kit Foxes would locate. Reference page
Plan. 285 and Fig. 6.2 of the Specific Plan -
should preconstruction survey identify
Kit Fox - a plan would need to be
prepared. Should a preconstruction
survey identify the presence of the Kit
Fox a KFHMP would have to be prepared.
22
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
V MTV ACS. ' L WHAT 0 'HE AGTTtSN CR k 4 stTRLk 6 AR3 N0 P C A; ACfloN: AKEN F COND tXl2 f4'CAl3
NO MEM A R o S NNEgV
N[s. NO A a N A
221 03.07 6N P Restrict the use of rodenticides and herbicides TMAP CONT X Require developer to contact County Ag
/19.0 W within the Project area in order to reduce SDR and prepare and distribute handout to
potential impacts to wildlife. tenants. Also require shopping center
management to comply.
222 03.07 P Tri-colored Blackbird. Require developers TMAP FMAP X Need condition.
/20.0 L conduct a preconstruction survey within 60 days SDR BLDP
1 prior to habitat modification to verify the
presence of sensitive species.
223 03.07 P Ensure the protection and enhancement of TMAP FMAP X Need condition re preconstruction survey
/21.0 L sensitive species habitat areas. SDR BLDP and protection if sensitive species
identified.
224 03.07 P Require the maintenance of a buffer around FMAP FI/O X Condition re: if preconstruction survey
/22.0 L breeding sites of the redlegged frog, BLDP turns up certain species require a
California tiger salamander, and the Western buffer, etc.
pond turtle before commencing construction.
228 03.07 6M P Require the placement of all transmission lines TMAP FMAP X Need condition.
/26.0 W underground whenever feasible, to avoid the SDR BLDP
potential for raptor electrocutions.
229 03.07 P Require a minimum buffer (at least 300 feet) be BLDP FI/0 X Standard condition regarding
/27.0 W maintained around nesting sites of the preconstruction survey. No badgers
burrowing owl and breeding sites (either known identified on site during biological
or those identified in preconstruction surveys) survey of DEIR.
of the American badger during the breeding
season to avoid direct loss of individuals. _
230 03.07 6L P Special Status Invertevrates, Require TMAP FMAP X Need condition.
/28.0 L developers conduct a preconstruction survey SDR BLDP
within 60 days prior to habitat modification to
verify the presence of sensitive species.
231 03.08 P Establish a visually distinctive community PREZ FMAP X The project has been designed with this
/01.0 L which preserves the character of the natural ANNE BLDP mitigation measure in mind. It is
landscape by protecting key visual elements and REZO sensitive to the creek and does not
maintaining views from major travel corridors block views of vistas from I-580.
and public spaces.
232 03.08 P Ensure implementation of the Specific Plan/ PREZ FMAP X This project has been designed with this
/02.0 L General Plan land use plan, which was developed ANNE BLDP mitigation measure in mind. It is
to retain predominant natural features and a REZO sensitive to the Creek and does not
sense of openness. block vistas from I-580.
4
23
•
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
• FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
'TT MZV ACT.:: , DZHBT IB I 2lC.TCA1 CaP,f4ElSU $'.CAYi' 1N11 <E' C A ACTZQN T.A1tEN '(7Q$D CO2 .i,ETip
NO MEAS'. BROG; R s S.
15M ONEOMMONMEMMENEOPMMORRNMEEMEM moan=MOWDF
233 03.08 6S P Establish technique(s) for implementing the PREZ FMAP X This project has been designed with this
/03.0 L long term preservation of visually significant ANNE BLDP mitigation measure in mind. It is
portions of hillsides and other important REZO sensitive to the Creek and does not
visual resources. block vistas from I-580.
241 03.08 P Locate structures so they do not obstruct PREZ FMAP X The location and design of structures
/05.1 L scenic views or appear to extend above an ANNE BLDP will not block scenic views from I-580.
identified scenic backdrop when viewed from a REZO
designated scenic route.
243 03.08 P Avoid unnecessary alteration or disturbance and PREZ FMAP X Tassajara Creek is not a part of this
/06.0 L maintain access to the stream corridors from ANNE BLDP project. Structures will be set back
adjoining development to protect the visual REZO 150 from the top of bank. Any
character of the stream corridors. alterations to the creek for flood
control purposes will be minimal and
done with consultation with permitting
agencies. Access and views of the creek
will be maintained.
244 03.08 P Preserve views of designated open space areas. PREZ FMAP X The location and design of structures
/07.0 L ANNE BLDP will not block views from I-580.
REZO
245 03.08 P Provide for the preparation of a visual survey PREZ TMAP X X Require preparation of a visual survey
/07.1 L of the Project area to identify and map ANNE SDR as part of project Site Development
viewsheds of scenic vistas. REZO _ Review submittal.
246 03.08 6Q P Provide for the designation of scenic PREZ ANNE X X Staff is currently working on a scenic
/08.0 L corridors, and the adoption of scenic corridor ANNE corridor policy for the Specific Plan
policies and review procedures for projects Area. The location and design of
S within a scenic corridor viewshed. structures will not significantly block
or impact views from I-580 to major
a. Adopt Tassajara Road, I-580, and Fallon scenic views. A visual survey will be
Road as designated scenic corridors. required as part of site development
review application.
247 03.08 6R P Require projects with potential impacts on PREZ SDR X The project has been designed to not
/08.1 L scenic corridors submit a detailed visual ANNE FMAP block scenic vistas of either the Creek
analysis with development project applications. REZO _ or hillside areas.
248 03.09 P Require mechanical and/ or hand subsurface TMAP FMAP X Although no prehistoric resources were
/01.0 L testing on all locations of prehistoric SDR BLDP identified as a result of the DEIR, the
resources to determine the presence or absence standard condition re discovery will be
of midden deposits. _ included.
24
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
IC 4I2 ACT P.liak iB TR ACTION r5R NEAStF. BTART Lil c ri ACTIO TAITAN C0.11 C tETEO
NO r MP RS w FROG E R 7 S N
NA. NO A O N A
F J. D i'
249 03.09 P Require all locations containing either midden TMAP FMAP X Although no prehistoric resources were
/02.0 L components or concentrations of cultural SDR BLDP identified as a result of the DEIR, the
materials located on the surface be recorded on standard condition re discovery will be
State of California site survey forms. included.
250 03.09 P Require evaluative testing if proposed TMAP FMAP X Although no prehistoric resources were
( /03.0 L development would directly or indirectly impact SDR BLDP identified as a result of the DEIR, the
recorded and mapped locations of resources. standard condition re discovery will be
included.
251 03.09 P Require a qualified archaeologist develop a TMAP FMAP X Although no prehistoric resources were
/04.0 L protection program for "significant" resources SDR BLDP identified as a result of the DEIR, the
whose condition will be altered by the proposed standard condition re discovery will be
development. included.
252 03.09 P Require grading and construction cease in the BLDP FI/O X Write standard condition.
/05.0 W event that historic or prehistoric remains are
discovered during such activities.
253 03.09 6P P Require as part of the development application TMAP FMAP X Site not identified as having any
/06.0 L process that steps be taken to ensure that SDR BLDP prehistoric remains or historic
cultural resources are not impacted. structures. However, standard condition
regarding discovery of prehistoric
a. Determine whether the subject site is remains will be required.
identified as having prehistoric or
historic resources potentially located on it
based on the first stage cultural resource
survey of the area.
t b. Determine the level of archaeological or
historical significance in the second level of
detailed research and field reconnaissance for
sites with potential resources.
c. Develop a mitigation plan consistent with
policies in the Specific Plan and current CEQA
Guidelines concerning cultural resources for
sites containing significant resources.
25
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
- FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
TI MiT< G1`. F, 9pH$T P6 T, BKAC# :0:A O M.W. .i gib #S�#'AMtT END $ A AGTX:Wg4U N N17 CIMPAET
NO, t+ AS. PRE.' $ 22 z5 S N,0
aag NO. : NQ. A N A'
E k 11 <J Ii P
264 03.10 P Require applicants to minimize construction BLDP FI/0 X A condition will be required
/05.0 L noise impacts, implementing this.
a. Request that all construction operations
comply with local noise standards and be
limited to normal daytime hours, and stationary
equipment be adequately muffled and located
away from sensitive receptors. _
266 03.10 P Provide for the establishment of a noise PREZ TMAP X X.
The ordinance must be prepared and a
/07.0 L mitigation monitoring fee to pay for on and ANNE SDR condition applied which ensures that
offsite noise mitigations, including but not REZO developers participate.
limited to, noise barriers, earthen berms, or
retrofitting structures with soundrated
windows. This mitigation measure appears in
the cumulative impacts section of the DEIR.
268 03.11 P Minimize construction interference with FMAP FI/0 X Write condition regarding approval of
/02.0 W regional non-project traffic movement. GRAD construction traffic route.
BLDP
269 03.11 P Require emissions control from onsite equipment FMAP FI/O X Need condition regarding construction
/03.0 L through a routine mandatory program of low GRAD equipment at the site.
emissions tuneups. BLDP
270 03.11 P Require preparation of a construction impact SDR FI/O X - Require as condition of tentative map.
/04.0 L reduction plan that incorporates all proposed
air duality mitigation strategies.
( 272 03.11 P Maintain consistency among specific development TMAP FMAP -X Consistency findings need to be made on
/06.0 L plans and regional transportation and growth SDR BLDP project. Conditions may be necessary.
management plans.
273 03.11 P Implement transportation demand management TMAP FMAP X Require developer to submit employment
/07.0 W techniques to reduce mobile source emissions. SDR BLDP information. Also require compliance
with Trip Reduction Ordinance.
274 03.11 P Optimize the existing transportation system to CONT CONT X The City adopted a Trip Reduction
/08.0 W reduce congestion and shift travel to nonpeak Ordinance which will implement this
travel periods. mitigation measure. BAAQMD adminsters
the Ordinance.
-
26
•
• MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
$40W IMMO AC1` ,i 1',« NH'AT i5 T.#3R 1'iC'TTtY.'A4 Ok t4EASUkW ..... T [FD <i+` G AMEREEMESOPTWIAMEINNEMOMMUMMWMOMSZOIMEN
NG. NEAS'. FROG, $ UNNIMBONNOMEMOMBEROMMOMMOMENENMAI MEMO MUNEM it- O S:mounammounagumegEROIREEMum 444WI
AWRE 1NQ. AMNEMBEREMBEEMEMBEEMBEE808 SEERSESS* N A
MMgagangggERAOLEMEMERNMEMMONNAMEMEMENEMBIBEEENSPENMENMWACiONAMMEOMMEMEMENENMEMEMEMOMumnumMENEW
275 03.11 P Coordinate levels of growth with roadway TMAP FMAP X The traffic study will address these
/09.0 W transportation facilities improvements to SDR BLDP issues. A Traffic Impact Fee will be
accommodate travel demand without inducing developed to fund construction of
demand by providing excess system capacity. transportation improvements as they are
needed. A condition that applicant pay
( traffic fee will be required.
276 03.11 P Encourage mixed use development that provides PREZ TMAP X Although the project is solely
/10.0 L housing, jobs, goods and services in close ANNE SDR commercial, the Santa Rita area, of
proximity. REZO which this project is a part has both
residential and commercial and provides
a good balance of jobs and housing.
277 03.11 P Require linkage between growth of housing and PREZ CONT X This commercial project, when combined
/11.0 L job opportunities consistent with a positive ANNE with other projects, commercial and
subregional contribution to jobs/ housing ratio REZO residential in the specific plan,
balances. provides a positive linkage between
housing and job ratio balances.
278 03.11 P Minimize stationary source emissions associated PREZ TMAP X Development standards for the project
/12.0 L with Project development wherever feasible. ANNE SDR have been designed to satisfy this
REZO condition.
279 03.11 P Incorporate solid waste recycling in all PREZ CONT X Write condition.
/13.0 L development planning. ANNE
REZO
280 03.12 11.3 P Prepare development agreements with detailed PREZ TMAP X A development agreement is being
/01.0 .1 L financing plans prior to specific levels of REZO SDR prepared that will address issues
development approval to identify necessary specific to this project.
capital improvements, including public
facilities, streets and utilities, and assure
their timely financing.
282 03.12 C Create one or more Mello Roos CFD or Special PREZ TMAP X The developer will be putting in the
/03.0 M Assessment Districts to finance construction of ANNE SDR infrastructure surrounding the project.
the infrastructure to serve the Area of REZO An area of benefit may need to be formed
Benefit. for some of the improvements.
284 03.12 C Analyze the citywide infrastructure needs to PREZ TMAP X AB1600 studies are being prepared for
/05.0 M assess the usefulness of implementing an impact ANNE SDR the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. Any
fee program, in compliance with AB 1600, that REZO participation in identified improvements
could draw some funding from new development will be made conditions of approval or
when Final Map or Building Permits are issued, included in the Development Agreement.
27
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER SORTED BY MITIGATION MEASURE NUMBER, NOVEMBER 30, 1994
EASTERN DUBLIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MEASURES/ACTION PROGRAMS/IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
IT. MIT ACT. L WHAT IS THE ACTION OR MEASURE ' START END P C A ACTION TAKEN COND COMPLETED
NO. MEAS. PROC E R 0 S NO.
NO. NO. A 0 N A
f D I J D P
286 03.12 P Coordinate City and Caltrans efforts to fund PREZ TMAP X A traffic study will identify impacts
/07.0 W necessary freeway improvements and collect ANNE SDR and develop a fee to mitigate the
developers' share of costs. REZO project s fair share of these impacts.
287 03.12 C Coordinate City and DSRSD efforts to fund PREZ TMAP X See DSRSD comments letter dated 9/21/94
/08.0 M utilities services and collect developer's ANNE SDR
' share of costs. REZO
1
28
n
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND ADOPT THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
FOR PA 94-001, THE SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER PROJECT
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) , State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines require that certain projects be
reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental
documents be prepared; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin prepared a program
environmental impact report (SCH No. 91103064) for the
Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin certified the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Dublin General
Plan Amendment and Specific Plan on May 10, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project will
be located within the boundaries of the Eastern Dublin
Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration was prepared for the Santa Rita Commercial
Center Project; and
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Section 21080.6 requires
the City to adopt a reporting or monitoring program for
changes in a project or conditions imposed to mitigate or
avoid significant environmental effects in order to ensure
compliance during project implementation; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been
prepared for the Santa Rita Commercial Center Project in
accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21080.6; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Dublin
has held two public hearings on the documents entitled the
Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH No.
94113020) and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the proposed
Santa Rita Commercial Center Project on December 19, 1994
and January 3, 1995; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received and reviewed
the City Planning Department's Staff Report, including said
EXHIBIT c
e.1 /'1
Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Program on the environmental effects of the
project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the
documentary and oral evidence submitted at the public
hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission does hereby find that:
1. The Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and
Mitigation Monitoring Program are adequate and have been
prepared in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act, CEQA Guidelines and the City of Dublin
Environmental Guidelines; and
2. That the Planning Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in the Initial Study,
Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation Monitoring
Program; and
3. That based upon a review of the Planned Development
Proposal, consultations with responsible agencies and
analysis of pertinent environmental issues presented in the
Initial Study, the Planning Commission has hereby found and
determined that, although the proposed project may have
potentially significant effects on the environment as
presented in the Initial Study, the mitigation measures and
conditions of approval have reduced any impacts of the
project to a level of insignificance and that the project
will not have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the
Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City
Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt
the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Santa Rita
Commercial Center Project.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of January,
1995.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
n
Planning Commission
Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
94001042
RESOLUTION NO.94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AND ESTABLISH FINDINGS AND GENERAL
PROVISIONS FOR A PD,PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING CONCERNING
PA 94-001 SANTA RITA COMMERCIAL CENTER
WHEREAS,Homart Development Co., a Delaware Corporation, and the Surplus Property Authority of the
County of Alameda(Applicants), are requesting a Planned Development Rezoning to establish General Provisions and
Development Regulations for a 75±acre portion of APN 946-15-1-4 (por) ; and
WHEREAS,Homart Development Co., a Delaware Corporation, and the Surplus Property Authority of the
County of Alameda(Applicants), have submitted a Land Use and Development Plan as required by Section 8.31-13 of
the Zoning Ordinance which meets the requirements of said section; and
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission did hold public hearings on said application on December 19, 1994,and
January 3, 1995; and
WHEREAS,proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and
WHEREAS,the application has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
("CEQA")and a Mitigated Negative Declaration(SCH 94113020)has been prepared; and
WHEREAS,with the inclusion of mitigation measures and conditions of approval, it has been determined that
the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS,the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission recommend City
Council approval of the application subject to conditions prepared by Staff; and
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission did hear and use their independent judgment and considered all said
reports,recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that:
l. The Planned Development Rezone will be appropriate for the subject property in terms of providing a
range of permitted and conditionally permitted uses which will be compatible with existing vacant and
proposed commercial, office and residential uses in the immediate vicinity, and which enhances
development of the Specific Plan area; and
2. The Planned Development Rezoning will not have a substantial adverse affect on health or safety or be
substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or public improvement as all
applicable regulations will be met; and
3. The Planned Development Rezoning will not overburden public services as the Dublin San Ramon
Services District has stated that public services are available; and
4. The Planned Development Rezoning will be consistent with the policies of the Dublin General Plan and
the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan designation of General Commercial; and
5. The Planned Development Rezoning will provide efficient use of the land that includes preservation of
significant open areas and natural and topographic landscape features along Tassajara Creek with
minimum alteration of natural land forms; and
c:\planning\jeri\94001rs1 D
1 °MIMI
6. The Planned Development Rezoning will provide an environment that will encourage the use of common
open areas for neighborhood or community activities and other amenities through conditions of approval;
and
7. The Planned Development Rezoning will create an attractive, efficient and safe environment through
conditions of approval; and
8. The Planned Development Rezoning will benefit the public necessity, convenience and general welfare
and is in conformance with Sections 8-31.0 to 8-31.19 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance; and
9. The Planned Development Rezoning will be compatible with and enhance the general development of
the area because it will be developed pursuant to conditions of approval and site development review;
and
10. The Planned Development Rezoning will create attractive,efficient and safe development because it will
be developed pursuant to conditions of approval and site development review.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the
City Council approve PA 94-001, Santa Rita Commercial Center Planned Development, subject to the following General
Provisions and Development Standards which constitute regulations for the use, improvement and maintenance of the
75±acre parcel 946-15-1-4.
GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1. Intent: This approval is for Planned Development Rezone PA 94-001, Santa Rita Commercial Center.
This Planned Development District is established to provide for and regulate the development of the Santa Rita
Commercial Center. Development shall be generally consistent with the Land Use Development Plan which consists of
the following submittals:
A. Planned Development Rezone Application dated September 6, 1994; and
B. The"Conceptual Site Plan"dated September 23, 1994 which supersedes the document entitled
"Conceptual Site Plan" in the September 6, 1994 application.
2. The following principal uses are permitted in the PD District
A. Retail commercial establishments, including, but not limited to,the following:
1. General Merchandise Store
2. Discount/Warehouse Retail Store
3. Clothing/Fashion Store
4. Shoe Store
5. Home Furnishing Store
6. Office Supply Store
7. Home Appliance/Electronics Store
8. Home Improvement Store
9. Music Store
10. Hobby/Special Interest Store
11. Gifts/Specialty Store
12. Jewelry and Cosmetic Store
13. Drug Store
14. Auto Parts Store
15. Toy Store
16. Book Store
17. Pet Supplies Store(including in-store veterinary clinic)
18. Sporting Goods Store
c:\planning\jeri\94001 rs 1
2
19. Grocery/Food Store
20. Automobile Service
and similar uses that sell goods based on price and quality.
B. Eating, drinking and entertainment establishments, including, but not limited to,the following:
1. Restaurant
2. Wine or liquor bar with on-sale liquor license
3. Micro-brewery
4. Nightclub
5. Indoor movie theater
6. Delicatessen
7. Specialty Food
8. Bakery
9. Ice Cream Shop
10. Sandwich Shop
11. Video Arcade/Rentals
12. Drive-through Facilities, including restaurants
C. Office and service establishments including, but not limited to:
1. Bank/Savings and Loan
2. Real Estate/Title Office
3. Travel Agent
4. Legal
5. Accounting
6. Medical and Dental
7. Optometrist
8. Architect
9. Employment Agency
10. Hair/Beauty Salon
11. Cleaner and Dryer
12. Shoe Repair
13. Key Shop
14. Tailor
15. Athletic Club
16. Formal Wear/Rental
17. Other Administrative and Professional Office
18. Technology Access Center
19. Tele-Commuting Center
3. The following are conditional uses in the PD District and shall be permitted only if approved by the
Planning Commission:
1. Community, religious and charitable institutional facilities
2. Public Facilities and uses
3. Veterinary Office
4. Recycling Center
5. In-patient and out-patient health facilities as licensed by the State Department of Health
Services
6. Gas Station
7. Outdoor food vendors
8. Automobile sales
9. Hotel/Motel
c:\planning\jeri\94001rs1
3
PriN
4. Any structure,circulation,parking, landscaping and signage shall be subject to Site Development
Review(pursuant to Section 8-95 of the Zoning Ordinance)unless zoning approval is granted upon the
determination that the construction constitutes a minor project and that the Building Permit plans are in
accord with the intent and objectives of the Site Development Review procedures.
5. Setbacks and Yards
A. Minimum Setbacks: The minimum perimeter setbacks for buildings, accessory structures,
parking areas, driveways and loading areas shall be as follows:
1. Along Interstate 580: 20 feet from right-of-way.
2. Along Dublin Boulevard: 20 feet from right-of-way.
3. Along Tassajara Creek: A minimum 100 foot setback from the top of bank will be
maintained along Tassajara Creek.
The setback zones shall be fully landscaped with both hardscape(private sidewalks and other hard
surfaced areas)and softscape(trees, shrubs,ground cover,etc.).
B. Exceptions to the above setback requirements are the following:
1. Architectural projections(such as eaves, columns,balconies, arcades, awnings, steps and
decks)which may encroach up to a maximum of 10 feet into a required setback,with a
minimum setback of 10 feet from a street right-of-way.
2. Freestanding signage: As permitted in the Master Sign Program.
C. Minimum Yards: The required setback between all buildings within the project for all yards is 0
feet.
6. Building and other structures will be limited to a maximum height of 75 feet in this District.
7. The overall maximum floor area ratio for this district will be .25 permitting a total of approximately
800,000±square feet of Gross Leasable Area(GLA)on 75 acres.
8. Parking and loading:
A. Parking and Loading Spaces. There shall be provided and maintained in accordance with these
standards,off-street automobile parking and loading spaces for every building and use. No
building or structure shall be erected or use established and no existing building shall be
structurally altered, unless there is already in existence, or unless provision therefore is made
concurrently with such erection or structural alteration or new use,the number of parking spaces
and loading spaces necessary to meet the minimum requirements hereinafter set forth.
B. Continuing Character of Obligation. The maintenance of the parking and loading spaces
required shall be a continuing obligation of the owner of the real property upon which the
building or structure is located as long as the building or structure exists and the use requiring
such space continues. It shall be unlawful for an owner of a building or structure affected by
these requirements to discontinue,change or dispense with or to cause the discontinuance, sale
or transfer of such building or structure,without establishing alternative spaces which conform
to those requirements; or for any person, firm, or corporation to use such building or structure
without providing such required parking or loading spaces, in compliance with these standards.
C. Parking Spaces: Accessibility. These standards are intended to provide off-street spaces for the
parking of the automobiles of tenants of the premises and for clients, customers, employees, and
callers. They are required to be kept accessible for the purposes continuously,and the use of any
c:\planning\jeri\94001 rs 1
4
such required space or spaces other than these specified, shall constitute discontinuance thereof
in violation of Section 8-63.1.
D. Parking Spaces: Size and Location. A standard parking stall shall be a minimum of nine(9)feet
wide by nineteen(19)feet in length. Compact stalls shall be a minimum of eight(8)feet wide
by a minimum of seventeen(17)feet in length. Compact parking spaces may comprise up to
25%of the required parking spaces. Where parking spaces abut sidewalks or landscape areas the
length of a parking stall may be reduced by two feet. Minor adjustments to parking space size
and location may be made through the Site Development Review process.
E. Loading Spaces: Size and Location. Required loading space for buildings with an aggregate
floor area less than forty-thousand(40,000)s.f. shall be not less than ten(10)feet in width and
twenty(20)feet in length. Required loading spaces at buildings with an aggregate floor area
over forty-thousand(40,000) s.f. shall be not less than ten(10)feet in width and sixty(60)feet in
length. Every required loading space shall be clear to a height of not less than fourteen(14)feet.
Every required loading space shall be on the same lot as the structure it serves or on an abutting
lot and shall be continuously accessible from the street. No loading space shall occupy any part
of a required parking space,or any required street side yard of a corner lot.
F. Parking and Loading Spaces: Approval of Plan. A site plan showing the location of the existing
and proposed building or buildings and other improvements,the location of all required parking
and loading spaces, and all provisions for maneuvering space and access thereto from a public
right-of-way including proposed curb cuts, shall be submitted and approved as being convenient
and functional prior to the issuance of Building Permit. No approval of occupancy shall be
issued upon completion of a building or structural alteration of a building or for any land use
when no buildings are erected or altered, unless and until all such spaces as required and as
shown upon approved plans and made a part of the Building Permit are in place and ready for
use.
G. Parking and Loading Spaces: Maintenance. All parking and loading spaces, access driveways,
and maneuvering areas required shall be graded and well drained and shall be maintained with
all weather dust-free surfacing. Lighting of parking and loading spaces shall be so arranged as to
be directed downward and away from any residential area.
H. Collective Action Permitted. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the joint use of
parking or loading space for two(2)or more buildings or uses if the total of such spaces
provided is not less than the sum of the requirements for the individual uses computed separately
in accordance with these standards.
Number of Spaces Required. The number of parking and/or loading spaces required shall be
calculated based on gross floor area for retail and office uses,and customer service area for
restaurant uses. When the calculation results in a fractional number, any fraction up to and
including one-half('/2)shall be disregarded and any fraction over one-half('A)shall be adjusted
to the next higher whole number.
J. Parking Spaces Required: The number of parking spaces required shall be not less than specified
in the following table:
USE Parking Required
Retail 4.5/1000 sq. ft.
Restaurant 7/1000 sq. ft.
Theater 1/5 seats
Office 4/1000 sq. ft.
c:\planning\jeri\94001 rs 1
5
Exception: Where an attested copy of a contract between the parties concerned is filed with the
Application for Building Permit, which contract sets forth a valid agreement for joint use of
parking spaces for the life of the buildings or uses concerned and a parking study has been
approved by the Zoning Administrator demonstrating that a lesser number of parking spaces
would be appropriate for the proposed use, through shared use of parking, then the number of
required parking spaces shall be reduced in accordance with the number indicated in the
approved parking study.
K. Loading Spaces Required: Every allowable use which has an aggregate gross floor area of
fifteen-thousand(15,000) square feet or more, shall provide loading spaces in accordance with
the following:
Aggregate Gross floor Area(sq. ft) Number of Loading Spaces required
15,000- 40,000 1
over 40,000 - 100,000 2
over 100,000 - 160,000 3
over 160,000 3 plus 1 for each full
80,000 square feet in
excess of 160,000
L. Minimum Aisle Widths: Parking aisles with two-way traffic shall have a minimum width of
twenty-two(22)feet for parking angles of 0, 30,45 and 60 degrees. Parking aisles with two-way
traffic shall have a minimum width of twenty-five(25 ) feet for 90 degree parking angle.
Parking aisles with one-way traffic shall have minimum widths as follows:
a) 15 feet for parking angles of 0, 30, and 45 degrees.
b) 18 feet for a parking angle of 60 degrees.
c) 25 feet for a parking angle of 90 degrees.
Minor adjustments to aisle width standards may be made through the Site Development Review
process.
M. Bicycle Facilities: Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided, at the minimum, at a ratio of one
space per 150 required automobile spaces. These facilities,which would provide for convenient
parking and locking of bicycles shall be located adjacent to the fronts of buildings and dispersed
throughout the shopping center.
9. The Master Sign Program will be submitted for review with the Site Development Review package.
10. A minimum ratio of twenty percent(20%)of the gross land area will be provided in open space, which
shall include landscape, entry, plaza and sidewalk areas. The minimum ratio of landscape to gross land
area shall be as follows:
Perimeter site areas: Ten (10%)percent
Parking areas: Five (5%)percent
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the
City Council approve PA 94-001 Planned Development Rezoning subject to the following conditions:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Unless stated otherwise. all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to final occupancy of any building, and
shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies
responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval. [PL] Planning. [B] Building. [PO] Police. [PW]
c:\planning\jeri\94001 rs I
6
Public Works, [ADM] Administration/City Attorney. [FIN] Finance, [F] Dougherty Regional Fire Authority. [DSR]
Dublin San Ramon Services District. [CO] Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District(Zone 7).
11. Developer shall work with LAVTA to establish the need,routes and bus schedule for this project prior to Site
Development Review(SDR). [PW]
12. Developer shall design bus turnouts,transit shelters and pedestrian paths(sidewalks)to match proposed LAVTA
routes and stops and to the City of Dublin's requirements and standards prior to issuance of the building permit.
Construction shall be undertaken as part of the street improvement work. [PW]
13. Alameda County shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Dublin that, in addition to other
provisions,provides that when the property to the east of the Santa Rita Commercial Center project develops,all
the action measures of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and Mitigation Measures of the Eastern Dublin FEIR
pertaining to Tassajara Creek adjacent to this project will be activated and completed or guaranteed for
completion. [PL]
14. Prior to obtaining building permits,the applicant must receive Site Development Review(SDR)approval from
the City of Dublin Planning Department. Said application for SDR approval shall include a visual survey to
insure scenic vistas as identified in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and FEIR are not blocked. [PL]
15. Homart Development Co.,Alameda County and the City of Dublin shall enter into a development agreement
which shall contain provisions for sequencing of infrastructure,any financing plans, payment of traffic,noise
and public facilities impact fees and other provisions deemed appropriate by the parties. [PL]
16. Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at the Santa Rita Commercial Center in accordance with the Planned
Development Rezone general provisions and development standards filed with the Planning Department. [PL]
17. The location and siting of project specific wastewater, storm drain and potable water system infrastructure shall
be consistent with the resource management policies of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan. [PL, PW]
18. Any proposed modifications or alterations to Tassajara Creek shall be approved by the City of Dublin and any
required permitting agencies and shall be consistent with the policies of Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and FEIR..
[PW,PL]
19. Developer shall pay a Traffic Impact Fee(TIF)based on the adopted Eastern Dublin TIF. The TIF must be paid
prior to issuance of any building permit. [B, PW]
20. Developer shall participate in the BAAQMD's Traffic Systems Management Program and provide a funding
mechanism to LAVTA for free bus passes for employees prior to occupancy of any buildings. [PW]
21. Prior to any combustible construction,fire facilities shall be in place to serve the project to the satisfaction of the
Dougherty Regional Fire Authority. [DSR,F,B]
22. Prior to receiving a building permit,applicant shall pay school fees to the satisfaction of the Dublin Unified
School District. [B]
23. The refuse collection areas within the project shall be reviewed by the garbage service provider to ensure that
adequate space is provided to accommodate collection and sorting of petrucible solid waste as well as source-
separated recyclable materials generated by the commercial businesses within the Homart project.
24. Prior to issuance of building permit,applicants shall provide written documentation that adequate electric, gas,
telephone and landfill capacity is available. [PW]
25. Developer shall submit plans for the water and sewer systems to service this development acceptable to DSRSD,
pay fees required by DSRSD and receive DSRSD's approval prior to issuance of any building permit. Developer
shall construct these facilities prior to occupancy. [B, PW]
c:\planning\jeri\94001 rs 1
7
26. Developer shall provide a "will serve" letter from DSRSD prior to issuance of the grading permit which states
that the Homart project can be served by DSRSD for water and sewer prior to occupancy. [B, PW]
27. Developer shall provide a recycled water system for the landscaping per City of Dublin, Zone 7 and DSRSD
requirements. The landscaping areas must meet City of Dublin Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
requirements. [PW]
28. Developer shall provide Public Utility Easements per requirements of the City of Dublin and/or public utility
companies as necessary to serve this area with utility services. [PW]
29 Developer shall participate, along with other Eastern Dublin developers who shall benefit, in financing
construction of needed new chlorination-fluoridation stations at the proposed Zone 7 turnouts in the Eastern
Dublin area. The details of this requirement are to be developed as part of the DSRSD reviews and approvals.
[PW]
30. Developer shall meet City of Dublin requirements for Dublin's Urban Runoff Program and shall apply for and
obtain a permit from the Regional Water Quality Board. All grading shall be performed during the non-rainy
season(April 15th to October 1st), or provide erosion control measures as part of the project to keep mud and silt
out of the storm drain system. [PW]
31. A preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the City that is prepared within 60 days prior to any habitat
modification to verify the presence of sensitive species, especially the San Joaquin Kit Fox, nesting raptors,the
red-legged frog, the Western Pond Turtle,the California Tiger Salamander,the Tri-Colored Blackbird, and other
species of special concern. Said survey shall be prepared by a biologist and shall be subject to Planning
Department review and approval. [PL]
32. Prior to issuance by the City of any building permit, all utility connection fees, plan checking fees, inspection
fees, permit fees and fees associated with a wastewater discharge permit shall be paid to DSRSD in accordance
with the rates and schedules established in the DSRSD Code. [PW, B]
33. All businesses will be required to secure a City of Dublin business license prior to opening for business and
provide the number, type and salary level of employees(on a form established by the City)for each business in
order to implement the housing and employment monitoring system.
34. The Developer shall contact the Alameda County Agricultural Department and develop and distribute a handout
to tenants regarding the safe use of rodenticides and herbicides within the project area. This handout is to be
developed, delivered to the City of Dublin for review, and approved by the City prior to the occupancy of any
buildings.
35. Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this Planned Development(PA 94-001)this project shall be
subject to the regulations of the C-2, General Commercial, District.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of January, 1995 .
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
c:\planning\jeri\94001 rs l
8
n
Economics Research Associates
L Affiliated with Drivers Jonas
RECEIVED
November 3,1994 I�'a e` 1994
CITY OF DUBLIN
Richard C.Ambrose
Dublin City Manager
P.O.Box 2340
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin,CA 94568 Project No.11247
Dear Mr.Ambrose:
Economics Research Associates(ERA)is pleased to present our memorandum report on the
fiscal impacts of the Homart power center. We have also enclosed copies of the revised fiscal analysis
projections of annexing approximately 1,500 acres in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Area to reflect
the most recent estimates of police costs. And finally you will also find enclosed a memorandum
summarizing the combined impacts of both actions.
We have sent two courtesy copies of the first study directly to Homart,but we have not given
them copies of the other documents. We have also not sent anything directly to the Dublin Planning
Department.
It is our sincere hope that this submittal concludes the fiscal analysis of these two projects. We
will, of course, remain receptive to questions and refinements if necessary. We appreciate the
opportunity to help again with Dublin's planning for future growth.
Resp submitted,
teven E.Spickar AICP
Vice President
ATTACHMENT 1
388 Market Street,Suite 1580,San Francisco,California 94111•(415)956-8152 Telex:340890(ECON RES SFO) Fax:(415)956-5274
Los Angeles•San Francisco•San Diego•Chicago•Washington,D.C.•London
Table 1
SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES,FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 TO 1998-99
Eastern Dublin Annexation Area and Homart Retail Project
Revenue/Expense Items FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 97-98 FY 98-99
Property Tax Revenue $ - S 17,434 S 170,539 $ 209,209 S 213,393
State Subventions or Sales Tax Revenue S - S 418,275 $ 956,421 $ 1,184,571 S 1,421,496
Total On-going Revenues S - S 435,709 S 1,126,960 $ 1,393,779 $ 1,634,888
Public Works $ - S 39,092 $ 52,123 $ 52,123 S 52,123
Finance Dept. $ - S 9,300 $ 12,400 $ 12,400 S 12,400
Fire Services S 40,917 S 175,534 $ 197,454 $ 205,248 S 211,515
Police Services S - S 289,634 S 520.951 $ 573,674 S 585.448
Total On-going Expenses S 40,917 S 513,560 S 782,928 S 843,445 S 861,486
Net On-going Revenue(Expense) $ (40,917) S (77,851) S 344,032 $ 550,334 S 773,402
Less One-Time Cost $ - S (138,290) S (15,000) $ - S -
Total Revenue(Expense) $ (40,917) $ (216,141) $ 329,032 $ 550,334 $ 773,402
Source: City of Dublin;ERA
1
I
' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
REZONING APPLICATION
1
For:
1
TRI-VALLEY CROSSINGS
•
Dublin,California
1
1
I
By:
Homart
' RECEIVED cemmmnc, ,,,
SEP b 1994
PLANNING ATTACHMENT Z
I
(11Ej(
REZONING APPLICATION FOR 75 ACRE SANTA RITA RETAIL SITE
GENERAL INFORMATION
_, Project Location: Seventy-five acre site in the northeast quadrant of the I-
580/Hacienda Drive interchange;Bounded by Hacienda
Drive on the west, Dublin Boulevard on the north,
Tassajara Creek on the east, and I-580 on the south.
Project Name: Santa Rita Commercial Center-Tri-Valley Crossings
Project
Description: Stand-alone Planned Development rezoning to permit
General Commercial uses,with subsequent permits to be
processed separately.
— Zoning District: Planned Development
APN: 946-15-1-4(partial)
Co-Applicant Name: Homart Community Centers/
Alameda County Surplus Property Authority
— WRITTEN STATEMENT
Homart Community Centers and Alameda County Surplus Property Authority ("Applicants") are
requesting that the City of Dublin rezone a 75±acre portion of the 951 acre Santa Rita property in
Eastern Dublin to permit general commercial/retail uses.
Presently,the site is zoned"Planned Development-Business Park/Industrial(low coverage)"as defined
in Zoning Ordinance 25-85. Under this ordinance,all projects within this District must be processed as
— a new Planned Development rezoning,complying with the 1985 General Plan designation.
The Dublin General Plan(pages 1-5)states that the existing zoning classification is"intended to provide
— a campus-like setting with open plazas and landscaped pedestrian amenities for the Primary Planning area
(research,limited manufacturing and distribution activities,and administrative offices that do not involve
heavy trucking or generate nuisances)and to allow retail uses to serve business and residents(emphasis
— added). Maximum floor area ratio,to be determined by zoning regulations,should be between.25 and
.37".
— In May, 1993,the Dublin City Council approved the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan,which was upheld by
a citywide referendum in November, 1993. The Eastern Dublin Specific Plan designates this site for
General Commercial(.20 to.60 FAR). According to the Specific Plan,this designation"accommodates
a range of regional and community-serving retail,service, and office uses."
Rezoning Application
Page 2
Consistent with both the 1985 General Plan designation and the newly adopted Eastern Dublin Specific
Plan,and as required by current zoning,the applicants are requesting that this 75 acre site be rezoned
—, to a PD (Planned Development General Commercial) District to provide a dynamic
retail/office/entertainment environment to serve businesses and residents.
- The Alameda County Surplus Property Authority is seeking to sell this 75± acre site to Homart
Community Centers for general commercial uses,while retaining full control over the remaining portion
of the 951 acre Santa Rita property. On May 2, 1994 the Dublin Planning Commission found that this
- proposed sale is consistent with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.
The Authority and Homart Community Centers will seek subsequent Site Development Review from the
— City for commercial projects,following leasing of the site. All structures,circulation,parking,landscaping
and signage is subject to site development review and the development standards set forth herein. A
parcel map is required to be completed in accordance with City of Dublin standards and recorded prior
- to issuance of a building permit.
The Santa Rita Rehabilitation Center,of which this site is a part,is an ASPIS listed site,requiring"low
— priority preliminary endangerment assessment"by the Department of Toxic Substance Control(DTSC)
Office. A Phase I Environmental Assessment Report was completed in January, 1994. Several
.. underground storage tanks have been removed and are currently under review by regulators for closure.
PROJECT BENEFITS
., This rezoning will have the following benefits to the City of Dublin:
1. It will replace an existing unsightly vacant property with a vibrant retail environment to
serve Dublin businesses and residents.
2. It will provide much needed space for existing Dublin retail businesses to expand.while still
remaining within the City of Dublin.
3. It will provide increased tax revenue to the City through increased retail sales tax.
- 4. It will provide job opportunities to City residents.
�- 5. It will provide a source of funds to pay for the recently completed Hacienda Drive/Dublin
Boulevard extension.
Rezoning Application
Page 3
— DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The PD District will have the following standards:
- I. Permitted Uses
The following principal uses are permitted in the PD District.
A. Retail commercial establishments,including,but not limited to,the following:
1. General Merchandise Store
2. Discount/Warehouse Retail Store
3. Clothing/Fashion Store
-� 4. Shoe Store
5. Home Furnishing Store
6. Office Supply Store
7. Home Appliance/Electronics Store
8. Home Improvement Store
9. Music Store
10. Hobby/Special Interest Store
11. Gifts/Specialty Store
12. Jewelry and Cosmetic Store
13. Drug Store
14. Auto Parts Store
.. 15. Toy Store
16. Book Store
17. Pet Supplies Store(including in-store veterinary clinic)
18. Sporting Goods Store
19. Grocery/Food Store
20. Automobile Service
and similar uses that sell goods based on price and quality.
.. B. Eating,drinking and entertainment establishments,including,but not limited
to, the following:
1. Restaurant
2. Wine or liquor bar with on-sale liquor license
3. Micro-brewery
4. Nightclub
Rezoning Application
Page 4
5. Indoor movie theater
6. Delicatessen
_ 7. Specialty Food
8. Bakery
9. Ice Cream Shop
10. Sandwich Shop
11. Video Arcade/Rentals
12. Drive-thru Facilities,including restaurants.
C. Office and service establishments including,but not limited to:
1. Bank/Savings and Loan
2. Real Estate/Title Office
3. Travel Agent
4. Legal
5. Accounting
6. Medical and Dental
7. Optometrist
8. Architect
9. Employment Agency
10. Hair/Beauty Salon
11. Cleaner and Dryer
12. Shoe Repair
13. Key Shop
14. Tailor
15. Athletic Club
16. Formal Wear/Rental
17. Other Administrative and Professional Office
18. Hotel
19. Technology Access Center
20. Tele-Commuting Center
II. Conditional Uses
The following are conditional uses in the PD District and shall be permitted only if
approved by the Planning Commission or the Zoning Administrator pursuant to Section 8-
�. 94.0,"CONDITIONAL USES,"of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.
A. Commercial uses such as:
Rezoning Application
Page 5
1. Community,religious and charitable institutional facilities
2. Public Facilities and uses
3. Veterinary Office
4. Recycling Center
5. In-patient and out-patient health facilities as licensed by the
State Department of Health Services
6. Gas Station
7. Outdoor food vendors
8. Automobile sales
B. Prohibited Uses:
1. Residential uses
2. Drilling for and/or removal of oil, gas, or other hydrocarbon
resources
3. Distillation of bones
4. Dumping,disposal,incineration,or reduction of garbage,sewer,
offal,dead animals or refuse
5. Stockyard or slaughter of animals
6. Cemeteries
7. Migrant or other camps
8. Storage of radioactive materials
III. Site Development Review
Any structure, circulation, parking, landscaping and signage shall be subject to Site
Development Review(pursuant to Section 8-95): unless zoning approval is granted upon
the determination that the construction constitutes a minor project and that the Building
Permit plans are in accord with the intent and objectives of the Site Development Review
procedures.
IV. Setbacks and Yards
A. Minimum Setbacks: The minimum setbacks for buildings, accessory structures,
parking areas,driveways and loading areas shall be as follows:
• Along Interstate 580:20 feet from right-of-way.
• Along Hacienda Drive: 20 feet from right-of-way.
Rezoning Application
Page 6
• Along Dublin Boulevard: 20 feet from right-of-way.
.. • Along Tassajara Creek: A minimum 100 foot setback from the top of bank
will be maintained along Tassajara Creek.
.. The setback zones shall be fully landscaped with both hardscape (private sidewalks and
other hard surfaced areas)and softscape(trees,shrubs,ground cover,etc.).
Exceptions to the above setback requirements are the following:
1. Architectural projections (such as eaves, columns, balconies,
arcades, awnings,steps and decks)which may encroach up to
a maximum of 10 feet into a required setback,with a minimum
setback of 10 feet from a street right-of-way.
2. Freestanding signage: As permitted in the Master Sign
Program.
B. Minimum Yards: The required setback for all yards is 0 feet.
V. Maximum Building Heights
Buildings and other structures will be limited to a maximum height of 75 feet in this
District.
VI. Maximum Floor Area Ratio(FAR)
The overall maximum floor area ratio for this district will be .25% permitting a total of
approximately 800,000 square feet of Gross Leasable Area(GLA)on 75 acres.
VII. Parking and Loading
A. Parking and Loading Spaces. There shall be provided and maintained in
accordance with these standards,off-street automobile parking and loading
., spaces for every building and use. No building or structure shall be erected
or use established and no existing building shall be structurally altered,unless
there be already in existence, or unless provision therefore is made
concurrently with such erection or structural alteration or new use, the
Rezoning Application
Page 7
number of parking spaces and loading spaces necessary to meet the minimum
requirements hereinafter set forth.
B. Continuing Character of Obligation. The maintenance of the parking and
loading spaces required shall be a continuing obligation of the owner of the
real estate upon which the building or structure is located as long as the
building or structure exists and the use requiring such space continues.It shall
be unlawful for an owner of a building or structure affected by these
.. requirements to discontinue, change or dispense with or to cause the
discontinuance, sale or transfer of such building or structure, without
establishing alternative spaces which conform to those requirements;or for
any person, firm, or corporation to use such building or structure without
providing such required parking or loading spaces,in compliance with these
standards.
C. Parking Spaces: Accessibility. These standards are intended to provide off-
street spaces for the parking of the automobiles of tenants of the premises
and for clients,customers,employees, and callers. They are required to be
kept accessible for the purposes continuously, and the use of any such
required space or spaces, uses other than these specified, shall constitute
discontinuance thereof in violation of Section 8-63.1.
.. D. Parking Spaces: Size and Location. A standard parking stall shall be a
minimum of nine(9)feet wide by a minimum of eighteen(18)feet in length.
Compact stalls shall be a minimum of eight(8)feet wide by a minimum of
seventeen(17)feet in length. Compact parking spaces may comprise up to
25%of the required parking spaces. Where parking spaces abut sidewalks or
landscape areas the length of parking stall may be reduced by two feet.
E. Loading Spaces: Size and Location. Required loading space at buildings
aggregate floor area less than forty-thousand(40,000) s.f.shall be not less
than ten(10)feet in width and twenty(20)feet in length. Required loading
spaces at buildings with an aggregate floor area over forty-thousand(40,000)
s.f.shall be not less than ten(10)feet in width and sixty(60)feet in length.
Every required loading space shall be clear to height of not less than fourteen
(14) feet. Every required loading space shall be on the same lot as the
structure it serves or on an abutting lot and shall be continuously accessible
from the street. No loading space shall occupy any part of a required parking
space,or any required street side yard or a corner lot.
Rezoning Application
Page 8
F. Parking and Loading Spaces: Approval of Plan. A site plan showing the
location of the existing and proposed building or buildings and other
improvements,the location of all required parking and loading spaces,and all
provisions for maneuvering space and access thereto from a public right-of-
way including proposed curb cuts,shall be submitted and approved as being
convenient and functional prior to the issuance of Building Permit. No
approval of occupancy shall be issued upon completion of a building or
structural alteration of a building or for any land use when no buildings are
erected or altered,unless and until all such spaces as required and as shown
upon approved plans and made a part of the Building Permit are in place and
ready for use.
G. Parking and Loading Spaces: Maintenance. All parking and loading spaces,
access driveways,and maneuvering areas required shall be graded and well
-- drained and shall be maintained with all weather dust-free surfacing. Lighting
of parking and loading spaces shall be so arranged as to be directed
downward and away from any residential area.
H. Collective Action Permitted. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to
prevent the joint use of parking or loading space for two (2) or more
buildings or uses if the total of such spaces provided is not less than the sum
of the requirements for the individual uses computed separately in accordance
with these standards.
I. Number of Spaces Required. The number of parking and/or loading spaces
required shall be calculated based on gross floor area for retail and office
uses, and customer service area for restaurant uses. When the calculation
results in a fractional number,any fraction up to and including one-half(1/2)
shall be disregarded and any fraction over one-half(1/2)shall be adjusted to
the next higher whole number.
., J. Parking Spaces Required: The number of parking spaces required shall be
not less than specified in the following table:
USE PARKING REOUIRED
Retail 4.5/1000 sq.ft.
., Restaurant 7/1000 sq.ft.
Theater 1/5 seats
Office 4/1000 sq.ft.
Rezoning Application
Page 9
Exception: Where an attested copy of a contract between the parties
concerned is filed with the Application for Building Permit,which contract
sets forth a valid agreement for joint use of parking spaces for the life of the
buildings or uses concerned and a parking study has been approved by the
Zoning Administrator demonstrating that a lesser number of parking spaces
,. would be appropriate for the proposed used,through shared use of parking,
then the number of required parking spaces shall be reduced in accordance
with the number indicated in the approved parking study.
K. Loading Spaces Required: Every allowable use which has an aggregate gross
floor area of fifteen-thousand(15,000) square feet or more, shall provide
loading spaces in accordance with the following:
Aggregate Gross floor Number of Loading
Area(sq.ft) Spaces required
15,000 - 40,000 1
over 40,000- 100,000 2
over 100,000- 160,000 3
over 160,000 3 plus 1 for each
full 80,000 square
feet in excess of 160,000
L. Minimum Aisles Widths: Parking aisles with two-way traffic shall have a
minimum width of twenty-two(22)feet for parking angles of 0,30,45 and 60
degrees. Parking aisles with two-way traffic shall have a minimum width of
24 feet for 90 degree parking angle.
Parking aisles with one-way traffic shall have minimum widths as follows:
a) 15 feet for parking angles of 0,30,and 45 degrees.
b) 18 feet for a parking angle of 60 degrees.
c) 24 feet for a parking angle of 90 degrees.
., M. Bicycle Facilities: Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided, at the
minimum, at a ration of one space per 150 required automobile spaces.
These facilities,which would provide for convenient parking and locking of
-� bicycles shall be located adjacent the fronts of buildings and dispersed
throughout the shopping center.
a
Rezoning Application
Page 10
IX. Signage:
The Master Sign Program will be submitted for review with the Site Development Reveiw
.. package.
X. Landscape:
A minimum ratio of twenty(20%)percent of the gross land area will be provided in open
space,which shall include landscape,entry,plaza and sidewalk areas. The minimum ratio
of landscape to gross land area shall be as follows:
Perimeter site areas: Ten(10%)percent
Parking areas: Five(5%)percent
The landscape/open space concept is illustrated in the sketches following this section.
wp5l\homart\dublin\rezoning.app
J \ _.,.____ ,
c---71:43-47414.4. f - r
o
0212:
_ ref �:_i�.o%---.we
r�i�. + �i 't► j�s
ii, D ' --___
Itil It Ll.la i 1 '
440
'i‘ .'' —
tz...s.--le '414. 4*I. S% WI a '
13 P I r 4 7: / I ,-.4
iilr•ria riar. dor.s.,,./._,.........7...,..... �� 1
o lea a 'glINU/A •` i Ail — ./.
0
•
i * i 'ql ? w:i:, 0 '14., ,b --...,.. :a a
CIO ? 1 i /P T 7
—
z : .z,, (s,„) , ii . .0 , if,;. . . 41- •
i �
►wi 1 ,�� �1 A jl n ,pry b` % •,� ; i •
Li
itow
. %...'V.: r- .
..„„Air, ) i
'''•41.6.....,.. 11421,- ,,,, i
•
4 ,,Ei: If la , 1.
o h' ��r
o ,47 Ak
0 ill
° d'r 117
� l��
-... _ : •
_
a
CIa
a
p
_ ¢+� Cr3i CS0
_ f•'
\ 1
a e !ptual Site Plan
r
Flowering trees in evergreen groundcover
Vehicular lighting
Lighting Trees in groundcover
, , /,0 i - ' ‘...V 1,1k7 ( ,.._':1?..2
/AV`1/it
-� Low berm or shrubs
4
I, __
L,,, I v' '. •I"--"''• ,ct52
,.,I! lit i/ b"�:L r:+ . — ''1!---• ' ' ' ---
, , .., ,
NII
Concave median catches rainwater
TRI-VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Hacienda Drive Section
Homart Community Centers Conceptual Sketch
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I —1 ._A iJ
I
Flowering tree in median Vehicular light pole .w Cluster of street trees
, . (PL Berm or shrubs to reduce view
46 into rear of buildings
7 � 1
a ck
fii9 Sidewalk : I e--w
Evergreen groundcover• —, f% I -t;•i '- �.;
mil
�� ��„t
., ii� .:"jai t L
I
TRI-VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Dublin Boulevard Section
Homart Community Centers Conceptual Sketch
771 =.1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 =
Evergreen groundcover or shrub
Annual color Sign wall
Groundcover Background wall
AlilC�►- :��Nl 7 1 _
gilt•
Light poles t, r, �� r- 1
- - - - - -____ - -.voosAilimem. nimmorgatrAal -roommw.. ..- t> , - ,::
- anoter.- -3 -powitivoicarialimuffirrisoiamerrimarmainimmi
i'l ' 1 * ! '4141 - -.401`4111111111 111107001 • ‘ e 4.1W4_,..1Mar-- , . ,
- ;,--- . -,-----.. ,
... . .____emii,..
-;_,IirW, 0 k 0 it) CLOWN Al 4Ir'4 a I gb I clg ° AreAV o o •
® ® ,- ® �i�r\1 Mr
rirallll Parking
Clump of shade trees
�- 4 Service Area
►a, io4Nor war s _ _
Large columnar 411 CI , pecial entry paving
entry framing tree
® ' ®
l
TRI-VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Dublin Boulevard Entry
Homart Community Centers Conceptual Sketch
► I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I
a
,.►....a to..
`esti i�dq are
/
St �'�1,.:� r; �•
V arm . a A ►i"' V A _., "
Provide landscaped pedestrian promenades through - ,!�' - �l�lim'_. ��
parking areas to link various parts of shopping i ( Elio, ';.► -��
complex p I
r T 741
I t '
.,
1 acIscl f'i
1 1 c) b /
1
G ' Q ° �'
Cluster trees in parking areas to provide l n 0 I 4
views of storefronts ' a
'' -4p, *4 et
i
iti-^".-.0 44 ) ' 4
LI. -4,. .., ..;,,i,.... .. ,
, ..,„ ,...
— if `i
•
. Ob
Utilize landscaping to reinforce circulation hierarchy '�P'' - '
Tall delineating trees & low hedges define auto entry
spines & interior streets r sir 44-�►-4 44—
TRI-VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Parking Landscape Concept
Homart Community Centers Conceptual Sketch
-1 .�] III 1 1 I I I I I I I I —"1 I =3 _7.1 =
Pots @ wall ends -----I- Shade trees
9
- de ��'22 " •Thematic lighting S�7.1
i LI ,
t� c
7 "; � ,,.,... Bollard cc,,
1 � � C
i i •//i
'-- o i' �*.. .ANEW. i ""- - �H /i4.li4+.Lt,Ia.it J. 1_��of l Q
Seating wall —
TRI-VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Typical Pedestrian Section
Homart Community Centers Conceptual Sketch
I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1
Tenant signage
Entrance element
Painted, colored concrete wall panels Parapet cap
w/rustication accent banding
Accent elements or lighting flf \ i
_ _„, iiiro
I al
/ al , _di,
, 0 ..._ - _.
-„.......... ,
. .
. . .
.____
107. "?I. 41....24.14....k.,.........._.,.........,•......_........•
/ _____1'r//4 i i
//// 7/117.,1...:..I._1.1///�.0.0 ;aNl/.mm//%/ 1 r
t• ,,�Y.tjh ,{ �a4 •n t/
• •
• • • • I `` 9k9. 8•. ,
-- - - .
1
Textural finish accent Post and Beam system Storefront window system
1
TRI-VALLEY CROSSINGS, DUBLIN Typical Building Elevation
Homart Community Centers Conceptual Sketch
�� i) 1. ,it w/�: • • IfAwic1. A -
Iii
yp�.� FF•-.�� � ��� r`„�� f 1'.�;�`��ir �+8 �.,ski, !� � ,, �1t' �`�i.1� _. -.---Il� p �
/�, 4 &_.__. r' •, . �+ al'� .i� �� ��•- i10 A i � ;1,� .�U �Y` -Ya#�l�a`-�s�i�i,.- • tnn M.'-h a y _ _
■
w i --- c �av P _
1`
1 t —
w
_N. --' /
i'
•
1 - _
Conceptual Sketch
VIEW OVI,R I-580 TO NORTHWEST