HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/20/1990 PC Agenda AGENDA
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting - Dublin Civic Center Tuesday - 7:30 p.m.
100 Civic Plaza, Council Chambers February 20, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
4. ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA
5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING - February 5, 1990
6. ORAL COMMUNICATION - At this time, members of the audience are
permitted to address the Planning Commission on any item which is
not on the Planning Commission agenda. Comments should not
exceed 5 minutes. If any person feels that this is insufficient
time to address his or her concern, that person should arrange
with the Planning Director to have his or her particular concern
placed on the agenda for a future meeting.
7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.1 PA 89-136 Therp Conditional Use Permit request to
continue use of a reconditioned car sales facility and
outdoor vehicle display area located at 6787 Dublin
Boulevard
8.2 PA 90-001 Lew Doty/Cadillac Conditional Use Permit
request to allow a 35 foot tall freestanding sign which
would exceed the 20 foot maximum height limit and a
Variance request to locate a freestanding sign within
the required 10 foot sideyard setback area located at
6301 Scarlett Court
8.3 PA 89-050 First Western Planned Development Rezoning
request to rezone from a C-1 to PD restricting future
new development to the northwestern portion of Parcel A
establishing permitted and conditional uses and
development standards located at 7450 Amador Valley
Boulevard
8.4 PA 88-010 Dublin Boulevard Extension General Plan
Amendment to modify the location of the Dublin
Boulevard Extension located north of Interstate 580,
west of Southern Pacific right-of-way and east of
Tassajara Road (to be continued)
9. NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10. OTHER BUSINESS
11. PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S CONCERNS
12. ADJOURNMENT
(Over for Procedures Summary)
•
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: February 20, 1990
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff 4-
PREPARED BY: Ralph Kachadourian, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: PA 89-136 Therp Collection Conditional Use Permit
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit request to continue use
of reconditioned car sales and outdoor vehicle
display area at 6787 Dublin Boulevard.
APPLICANT: Tom & Rhodie G. Therp
6787 Dublin Boulevard
Dublin, CA 94568
PROPERTY OWNER: Tom Huening
Dublin Business Center
451 Cornell Avenue
San Mateo, CA 94402
LOCATION: 6787 Dublin Boulevard
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-205-4-2
PARCEL SIZE: 1.45 acres
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Retail/Office & Automotive
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE: PD, Planned Development District
Automobile Storage and Display
SURROUNDING LAND USE
AND ZONING: North: M-1, Light Industrial (Wharehouse)
South: M-1, Light Industrial (Dublin Sports
Grounds)
East: C-2, General Commercial (Murco Center)
West: M-1, Light Industrial (Office)
COPIES TO: Applicant
' Owner
File PA 89-136
ITEM NO. '
PAGE_1._OF L
ZONING HISTORY: 2/7/80 - The site was rezoned to a PD, allowing
C-2 and M-1 uses. The PD required any change in
use to be processed as a Site Development Review
modification and/or a Conditional Use Permit.
12/19/83 - A Site Development Review was
approved for remodeling and landscape
improvements.
8/20/84 - A Site Development Review and
Conditional Use Permit was approved for Mike
Waseca to sell tractors at this location.
10/4/84 - Site Development Review was approved.
11/19/84 - A Conditional Use Permit was approved
for Burns European Motors.
5/13/85 - PD Rezoning and Site Development
Review to rezone Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 to PD
with C-2 uses was approved. Site Development
Review for a 4,485 square foot building was
approved.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
Section 8-49.2 states that automobile sales and storage is considered a
conditional use in a C-2 District.
Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to
determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2)whether
or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and
service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially
affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity;
and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific district in
which it is located.
Section 8-94.4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be
valid only for a specified term, and may be made contingent upon the
acceptance and observance of specified conditions, including but not limited
to the following matters:
a) substantial conformity to approved plans and drawings;
b) limitations on time of day for the conduct of specified
activities;
c) time period within which the approval shall be exercised and the
proposed use brought into existence, failing which, the approval
shall lapse and be void;
d) guarantees as to compliance with the terms of the approval,
including the posting of bond; and
-2-
PAGE OF L
e) compliance with requirements of other departments of the
City/County Government.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project has been found to be Categorically Exempt
from CEQA under Section 15301, Class 1 of the
California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. This
use consists of the operation of an existing private
structure involving no expansion of use beyond that
previously existing.
NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the February 20, 1990, hearing was
published in a local newspaper, and mailed to adjacent
property owners, and posted in public buildings.
ANALYSIS:
On November 19, 1984, the Planning Commission approved a request from
Burns European Motors for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale of
reconditioned automobiles at 6787 Dublin Boulevard. This approval expired on
November 19, 1989.
On November 14, 1989, the new Applicant submitted a Conditional Use
Permit application to the Planning Department requesting to continue operation
of the reconditioned automobile sales business and outdoor sales and display
area occupying eight (8) parking spaces along the west side of the building.
The operation of the reconditioned automobile sales and outdoor display
area has not changed from the previously approved Conditional Use Permit. The
Applicant has expanded the showroom display area to 11,826 square feet with
1,730 square feet of wharehouse space. The business is open to the public
Monday through Friday from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
on weekends.
The parking requirements for the center have not changed since approval
of the original Conditional Use Permit, PA 84-068. Adequate on-site parking
is provided to accommodate the auto sales business and the other two
businesses located within the building. A total of 68 parking spaces is still
available to accomodate the entire center with the 8 parking spaces in front
of the business to be used as an automobile display area only.
For the past two years the Therp Collection has operated their business
in compliance with the previous Conditional Use Permit requirements. The
application has been reviewed by the applicable public agencies and City
departments, and is in compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance.
3 L PAGE OF
RECOMMENDATION:
FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation.
2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public.
3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public.
4) Close public hearing and deliberate.
5) Adopt the Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit,
or give Staff and Applicant direction and continue the
matter.
ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached
Resolution (Exhibit B) to approve Conditional Use Permit PA 89-136
for the sale of reconditioned automobiles and outdoor auto sales
display at 6787 Dublin Boulevard.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: Site Plan
Exhibit B: Draft Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit for PA 89-136
Background Attachments:
Attachment 1: Location Map
Attachment 2: Standard Commercial Building Security Recommendations
PAGE_1_OF L
1 •
' I': I I I I I I I i I i [1)
It G
YD,<. I l �� I� 1 I OCT ' _I
1 , •
I I . .. LI ,. - :.w.w -..
,,..: , 4' I i I I I ... I� .r.»rn. _ gull
Lim
I
•
11'411-
.,.- LEASE SPACE MI•
.
•
r.I Cr 1,b•-•.,•. I i I
•
• (44:11 4.
II:
. 1 Ll f n y Lxlcn�c nuu
\ I I� ! 4 a t''.«:�l" Ouse ::PACE
. 7. f :-..-,...:,... el, ,,,, ... . I I i ;
. 1 •
, ..,..:. MW /
C-__.—.._ ,_ 1 LI_ -_ 4. I I il ..I - -__.._ •
•••- uC'LZAN NE AUOVE -
rk• II1 .............•
•
(, AAA I ck
•
i ; I I A'V`j/ • �C
I IX
f CN
TT�TT • V _ •
•4.fli •!,1. 2'.11-at.-'.-t•-•-• •-•.,\3 ,---(1;k\ 0
LI
--ITV w'.1r w. /� CP Oita. 1.N.M .
r.,-srt,.w. .. `•Vjl/p „ y • v�•, . it
{M D.uao .•w.4N
lw1/.N.. ti i-
•
'0'--1 ' ..'-- -._I., 1 TOILET
�I 11-1--. 1 I ---•.
•I•44 n y.%....C.... ..
el AV,.IINNOO_It I
Y.Y. n n(.Mw r 1.EABE BPACE#I '.EASE*PACE�a �°OA '`� I f:
n.z)WOY..w r_wn i f;,:,Ili; 11• AiE OPAC)r 1� 1.EA11E BPACE A6
.w-
• II 17.1
' I-::-..w—.•.""- I :id`•
1,1
1 11 .1 I 11 I IL7J 1 �I,,I 1 . r~ r - "W-{"�--,-/��;F I--- K� �l. 1 • L J' L�J L. T�� �`L
'� '•�•-...D ,ae,,:.a�:.:aY.
N•Y DGv/.l•C ILO. ID w414.YfM
�, _•...in--1 Y,�i,4 Iwi.0 .l.J'-n. /
•
T Y.1\..AY wuw P.O.
•
I . 1.0.• 4411. w.,�..f1Y.,1 w\ H.rIW Y,+l. Y IV.MY
. p r�p �ry w• O -
I �:1� _.1.=.kYccT�'Q I ..s1 l..w[�I.IM.It U t141 11.•Yw,u♦ , y 1•llti•.:In �� .
C ILIN6 1",AN ....oil I101 1
4G4.C.Vs' 1'.0. ,•I. tYw.it PI.00M1 I, [^-AN' .....u•,r.a...a ro,.,4. •
I :r DU 8 I ! N 8L VD •
.
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING PA 89-136 THERP COLLECTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
TO ALLOW THE CONTINUED SALE OF RECONDITIONED AUTOMOBILES
AND OUTDOOR AUTO SALE DISPLAY AT 6787 DUBLIN BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, Tom & Rhodie G. Therp filed a new Conditional Use Permit
application to allow the continued indoor sale and outdoor sale display of
reconditioned automobiles at 6787 Dublin Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said
application on February 20, 1990; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects
as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has been
found to be categorically exempt under Section 15301, Class 1; and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the application be
conditionally approved; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports,
recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does
hereby find:
1. The use is required by the public need to provide a place where
individuals can purchase reconditioned automobiles.
2. The use will be properly related to other land uses and transportation
and service facilities in the vicinity, as daytime activities will be
commensurate with the present use of properties in the commercial zoning
district.
3. The use, if permitted under all of the circumstances and conditions of
this particular case, will not materially affect adversely the health or
safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or
improvements in the area as all applicable regulations will be met.
4. The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or
performance standards established for the district in which it is to be
located. The use is consistent with the intent of the zoning district
and with the General Plan.
PAGE OF lD
. v s N d d
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby
conditionally approve PA 89-136 Therp Car Collection Conditional Use Permit,
subject to the following conditions of approval. Said conditions shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Dublin Planning Department.
1. This approval is for the operation of a 13,556 square foot indoor
reconditioned automobile sales facility and outdoor display area
occupying 8 parking spaces at 6787 Dublin Boulevard.
2. Outdoor display and sale of automobiles on this site shall be limited to
the eight parking spaces designated exclusively as the outdoor display
area and is appropriately designated to provide a clear distinction
between the auto display area and parking lot.
3. All new and existing signs on the site shall conform to the City of
Dublin Sign Ordinance.
4. No loudspeakers or outside amplification of music or sound shall be
allowed with the auto sales use or with any other special promotions.
5. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements of the
building code, the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority, and the Dublin
Police Services Standard Commercial Building Security Recommendations
(attached).
6. All landscaping on the site shall be maintained in a viable and well
kept manner at all times.
7. This approval shall become null and void, in the event the approved use
ceases to operate for a continuous one-year period.
8. This use shall be subject to Zoning Investigator review and
determination as to compliance with the conditions of approval on an
annual basis.
9. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-
90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or
conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1989.
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-2-
PAGE...OF Lo
�� n •
`, \n;�,,� '
'
1
N
;, ;
1'1;`11`` a .
9N ;:;-_,:::„- %It
i, ',\ ';;;„ ....K`
„;,, v, ‘, ..........„. ...„ „,„„
..... ...... ... , 0 v
. . _ . „
,,,"‘ .,,,,, ‘‘„_-_-_f:::;,..„,
,, � , \ ,` . sh
c; ` <n;j
i i c
rift*
,i ," 441,...."1„.41:-41*.al---111
• I
*4
V\' 3 �t
'1,1 • •is%
III 1.. _ v / .' �' '
; 11 II- - n r , �
f
Ili it _ J'-/ N \`.,�'.".-�
i I. !If ry 1 �• •� r_
Fiiii 1-
1 01
AI1
1 .I � Ni, ,
1 �'
73 .
"0 I; ii :i .„., it
y r
I • n i
.,z i
gho 1 . ( N
N \
L kei 1 / i .i 1 \ .7....., .......... ..
I
2:,
„, , 1 "
ATTACHMENT :
' - A PART OF THE
F*
r CITY OF c� SANTINA ZONING MAP
i4-11
pI"' E o I DUBLIN I c THOMPSON u..
THE CITY OF
_._ - I 1 , .. ,_. ,_..<. . ... DUBLIN ? of 0
CITY OF DUBLIN
POLICE SERVICES
STANDARD COMMERCIAL BUI D= SECURITY RECCMENDATIONS
I. DOORS
All exterior doors are to be constructed as follows:
a) wood doors shall be of solid core construction, no less than 1-3/4
inches thick.
b) Auxiliary locks are to be added to each door and shall be double
cylinder, one inch, throw deadbolt or equivalent burglary resistant
locks where permitted by the Building and Fire Cr Ps. The cylinders
are to be protected by cylinder ring guards so they cannot be gripped
by pliers or other wrenching devices.
c) In-swinging doors shall have rabbited jambs, or alternate means of
strengthening.
d) Exterior hinges shall have non-removable hinge pins.
e) Exterior and interior garage out-swinging doors shall have non-
removable, hidden or non-accessible hinge pins.
f) Doors with glass panels and doors that have glass panels adjacent to
the door frame shall be secured with ironwork or steel grills of at
1Past 1/8th inch material or 2 inch mesh secured on the inside of the
glazing.
g) All exterior doors, excluding front doors, shall have a minimum of
40 watt bulb over the outside of the door. Such bulb shall be
directed onto the door surfaces by reflectors.
h) The strike is to be a wrought box strike, or equivalent.
i) Sliding glass doors: All sliding glass doors shall be equipped with a
locking device that shall engage the strike sufficiently to prevent its
being disengaged by any possible movement of the door within the space
or clearances provided for installation and operation. The bolt and
strike shall be reinforced by hardened material so as to prevent their
separation by pulling, prying or similar attack. The locking device
function may be operable by a keyed or coded lock inside and out as
permitted by the Fire Department or Building Codes.
Double sliding glass doors shall be locked at the meeting rail.
II. WINDOWS
A. All accessible rear and side glass windows shall be secured as follows:
1) Any accessible window shall be secured on the inside with a
locking device capable of withstanding prying or wrenching.
2) Louvered windows shall not be used within eight feet of ground
level, adjacent structures, or fire escapes.
DP 83-012 ATTACH WZ /�
PAGE.�. OF�
/Th
B. Accessible-Transans
All exterior transans exceeding 8" x 12" on the side and rear
of any building or premise used for business purposes shall be
protected by one of the following:
1) Outside iron bars of at least 1/8" material spaced no more than
2" apart.
2) Outside iron or steel grills of at least 1/8" material, but not
more than 2" mesh.
3) The window barrier shall be secured with bolts, the rounded
or flush head on the outside.
4) Wire hung glass with positive locking devices.
III. ROOF OPENINGS
A. All glass skylights on the roof of any building or premises used
for business purposes shall be provided with:
1) Iron bars of at least 1/8" material spaced no more than 2" apart
under the skylight and securely fastened as in B-3.
2) A steel grill of at least 1/8" material of 2" mesh under the
skylight and securely fastened as in B-3.
3) Other skylight protection of approved design.
B. All hatchway openings on the roof of any building or premises used
for business purposes shall be secured as follows:
1) If the hatchway is of wooden material, it shall be covered on
the inside with at least 16 guage sheet steel or its equivalent
attached with screws at 6".
2) The hatchway shall be secured fran the inside with a slideher
or slide bolts. The lice of crossbar or padlock must be
approved by the Fire Marshal.
3) Outside hinges on all hatchway openings shall be provided with
non-removable pins when using pin-type hinges.
C. A11 air duct or air vent openings exceeding 8" x 12" on the roof
or exterior walls of any building or premise used for business
purposes shall be secured by covering the same with either of the
following:
1) Iron bars of at least 1/2" round or 1" x 1/4" flat steel
material, spaced no more than 5" apart and securely fastened
as in TT 13-3.
2) A steel grill of at least 1/8" material of 2" mesh and securely
fastened as in ['I 8-3.
PAGE /D nr /D
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: February 20, 1990
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff
PREPARED BY: Ralph Kachadourian, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: PA 90-001 Lew Doty Cadillac Oldsmobile
Freestanding Sign CUP/VAR
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit to allow a freestanding
sign to exceed the 20 foot maximum height limit,
and Variance request to locate the freestanding
sign within the 10 foot sideyard setback.
APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Wade McClure
1026 San Miguel Road
Concord, CA 94518
PROPERTY OWNER: L & S Commercial Real Estate
6301 Scarlett Court
Dublin, CA 94568
LOCATION: 6301 Scarlett Court
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-550-16-2
PARCEL SIZE: 4.15+ acres
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Business Park/Industrial: Outdoor Storage
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE: M-1 Light Industrial (Auto Dealership)
SURROUNDING LAND USE
AND ZONING: North: PD, Planned Development (vacant lot)
South: Scarlett Ct/I-580 Freeway
East: M-1, Light Industrial (truck
rental/storage)
COPIES TO: Applicant
Owner
2 File PA 90-001
ITEM NO.
PAGE_L_OFL
West: M-1, Light Industrial (machine
shops)
ZONING HISTORY: 9/17/84 - PA 84-054 Conditional Use Permit was
approved to establish a Cadillac dealership on
the site.
3/11/85 - PA 85-004, modification of PA 84-054
Conditional Use Permit for completion of Site
Improvements prior to operation of use.
8/15/85 - PA 85-046, Site Development Review for
Cadillac dealership.
6/10/86 - PA 86-023, Site Development Review for
Waterbed Factory for continued occupancy of a
warehouse within a portion of an existing
building.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
Section 8-87.60 (D) states that freestanding signs in excess of twenty
(20) feet in height, located on parcels of four (4) acres or greater in size,
are considered signs requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to
determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need;
2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses,
transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the
use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working
in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the
specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district
in which it is located.
Section 8-94.4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be
valid only for a specified term, and may be made contingent upon the
acceptance and observance of specified conditions.
Section 8-87.67 Variance procedure states that when practical
difficulty, unnecessary hardship, or a result which is inconsistent with the
purpose and intent of this Chapter occurs from the strict application of this
Chapter, the Planning Director may grant a Variance from the strict
application of the standards pertaining to size, height, and/or location of
signs regulated by this Chapter in the manner prescribed by this section. No
Variance may be granted from the number of freestanding signs allowed.
In order to grant a sign Variance, the following findings must be made:
1) that there are special circumstances including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, applicable to the property which deprive
the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under
the identical zoning classification;
-2-
PAGE OF
2) that the granting of the application will not constitute a grant
of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties
in the vicinity and zone; and
3) that the granting of the application will not be detrimental to
persons or property in the neighborhood or to the public welfare.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project has been found to be Categorically Exempt
from CEQA under Section 15311, Class 11 (a) and
Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines. This use consists of
placement of an on-premise sign accessory to an
existing commercial facility and minor alterations in
land use limitations (Variance) which will not result
in changes to land use or density.
NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the February 20, 1990, hearing was
published in a local newspaper, mailed to adjacent property
owners, and posted in public buildings.
ANALYSIS:
The Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to
erect a 35-foot tall freestanding sign on the site. The proposed sign will be
setback 50 feet from the Scarlett Court street frontage, and located
approximately one (1) foot from the east property line. The sign will be
double-faced with a total of 275 square feet of sign area, (137.5 square feet
per face).
The Applicant is also requesting approval of a Variance of the Sign
Ordinance regulating the location of the freestanding sign to be located
within the 10 foot sideyard setback area. The Applicant indicated that this
location would allow motorists traveling eastbound on I-580 to easily locate
the dealership as they pass under the Dougherty Road/Hopyard Road
overcrossing.
In order for the Applicant to erect the freestanding sign within the 10
foot sideyard setback area, a Variance is required.
Staff recommends denial of the Variance request based upon the following
findings:
1. There are no special circumstances including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, applicable to the property which deprive
the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under
the same zoning classification. The property is a generally large, relatively
flat rectangular parcel adjacent to Scarlett Court and Interstate 580.
Visibility of the dealership from the freeway and surrounding areas is not
hindered since the buildings prominant architectural features and overall
size, allows for high public visibility.
-3-
PAGE j OF�
2. The granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the
vicinity in that all properties and businesses must comply with the City's
Sign Ordinance regulating the size, height, and location of all signs within
the city unless all findings of fact are made. Granting a Variance to allow
the freestanding sign to be located within the 10 foot side yard setback area
does constitute a grant of special privilege in that there are other
alternative locations on the site to place the freestanding sign which do not
require granting a Variance and would be consistent with the City's Sign
Ordinance. Additionally, no other freestanding sign along Scarlett Court,
which exceed 20 feet in height, are located within the required front, side or
rear yard setback areas.
3. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to persons or
property in the vicinity or to the public welfare in that if the sign is
approved it will be required to comply with all building code regulations.
The Applicant has two options available with regard to locating a
freestanding sign on the site in conformance with the Sign Ordinance:
1. The Applicant can relocate the proposed freestanding sign
approximately 100 feet west of the east property line within the landscaped
planter (Attachment 1). A Variance would not be required, however, a
Conditional Use Permit to allow the 35 foot height would be required.
2. The Applicant can revise the Conditional Use Permit by reducing the
proposed sign to a 27.5 foot tall double-faced freestanding sign with 205
square feet of sign area, setback 35 feet from the street frontage within the
landscaped planter (Attachment 1).
Both Option #1 and #2 are consistent with the sign ordinance with
regards to area, location and height requirements.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Option #2 since it
appears it will achieve the desired visibility from the freeway, and base the
approval subject to the conditions identified in the resolution of approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation.
2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public.
3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public.
4) Close public hearing and deliberate.
5) Adopt Resolution relating to PA 90-001, or give Staff and
Applicant direction and continue the matter.
ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the draft
resolution (Exhibit B) denying the Variance request and adopt the
draft resolution (Exhibit C) approving the Conditional Use Permit
for PA 90-001.
-4-
PAGE OF
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A: Plans, sign elevations, site plan
Exhibit B: Draft resolution denying the Variance request
Exhibit C: Draft resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit request
Background Attachments:
Attachment 1: Alternate Sign Location
Attachment 2: Location Map
Attachment 3: Written statement from Applicant
Attachment 4: Variance findings from Applicant
Attachment 5: Applicant's proposed plans
-5-
PAGE r' OF‘C6
•
I -r • .---
1 _ _t_ .. .._ \I .i _I 1 i_ I . ._ 1 __ . ._. •
1._
. . 1 1 ! / {
..
�I / „At„At �Sl— I ,I __ �
-'+'. ,I,I,.
Yll(1'1 .A.1---H" _3 7 l''
�._ I �-- - r, '1 I i H
'�' ___ ._•_1!...7,34. .12 FM. ,________41.,
lames r.
. . .! 1 f i i ` 1 ` r swanson •
.e k,1...Jr. /1 ! I T
; 1 I i i �r t I i �, — landscape
•1 'I�. -i4 - �—
��.ry..w,.... - � � architect
ats-sea-esn
d.� 938 Ll ' 1 I ! I I 1 Iiiii.ri--t,.
•WI./
i i . 1 I , I 1 7.,4_,.1, 1 ! 1 t. ]
,(Jl I-
4 / w laNyetto.californle
' --. '7. .1._ 1 AIL(— y._
,` :u, „..T j.. • • :^_._.i=k`\1. <a: • •:.l - •' 'v..._.. ..-.— - - "L, w .•w.
1 vI ;I I w
'� _ J�1 t T- -ter
/ •.' 'vs, .. i._ 1, =ID•— — _—_4 — ,rl= I 1I i I I i —AI
-,1lirm.—
I Ih ,
-F i'�- L I Wt
i Et
v
'(' /i' .' " /
r.ea,Ir.�/ / �, imi —
VAN,I..A•---,.'•' 1 ''''''''.... / • ''.Vili' • 4111 x V,.
I �
/ . / rti1 Z 1.T •1 J
Y, ': ' _ /
..._6 vn„a 'I�'- 1� Ae:►, Vriu4 n�Iw•W
O� S/ N z
_—_— _�L — _ r ..-.
J 1 sETBAcC ECG �jI� �LPch�"1'Ih�G PLP<II /'_ of 3I
`- rl' �cc •4IrrT -> *cr- n..v+rwa LEAD*. I L I
SI . Roctiv4teopeo sae . ' -
RECEIVL ►
JAN031990 co, -
•
DUBLIN PLANNIN(
(..
. .. _ ›
. N
} ':'i { w }
v1 ,\
s
0
i m o
pN w I C3 . M
mil, o
o r—
m T
cn
- v
EW
in
N
I• r "I ilkZ v n
1 In ' /' t. • 7, (`f.
• n L. 1 b . •r 0'1
� m
d m
. ; \ •
L1
CA \ \
il.
m If ��
z ooEXHIBIT A
RECEIVED-
' , K
ri
CIAJAN 0 3 1990
1 DUBLIN PLANNING C
PAGF "7 OF
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
DENYING PA 90-001 LEW DOTY CADILLAC/OLDSMOBILE VARIANCE REQUEST TO
LOCATE A 35 FOOT TALL FREESTANDING SIGN WITHIN THE REQUIRED
10 FOOT SIDEYARD SETBACK AREA AT 6301 SCARLETT COURT
WHEREAS, Wade McClure, representing Lew Doty Cadillac/Oldsmobile filed a
Variance application to allow a 35' tall freestanding sign to be placed within
the required 10' sideyard setback area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said
application on February 20, 1990; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects
as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has been
found to be categorically exempt under Section 15305, Class 5 and Section
15311, Class 11(a).
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the Variance
application be denied; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports,
recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does
hereby find:
1. There are no special circumstances including size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, applicable to the property which deprive
the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under
the same zoning classification. The property is a generally large (4.15+
acres), relatively flat rectangular parcel adjacent to Scarlett Court and
Interstate 580. Visibility of the dealership from the freeway and surrounding
areas is not hindered since the buildings prominant architectural features and
overall size, allows for high public visibility.
2. The granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistant with the limitations upon other properties in the
vicinity in that all properties and businesses must comply with the City's
Sign Ordinance regulating the size, height, and location of all signs within
the city unless all findings of fact are made. Granting a Variance to allow
the freestanding sign to be located within the 10 foot side yard setback area
does constitute a grant of special privilege in that there are other
alternative locations on the site to place the freestanding sign which do not
EXHIBIL c
require granting a Variance and would be consistent with the City's Sign
Ordinance. Additionally, no other freestanding sign along Scarlett Court,
which exceed 20 feet in height, are located within the required front, side or
rear yard setback areas.
3. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to persons or
property in the vicinity or to the public welfare in that if the sign is
approved it will be required to comply with all building code regulations.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby
deny PA 90-001 Variance request to erect a 35' tall freestanding sign within
the 10' sideyard setback area.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1990.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-2-
PAGE 9 OF.1='_
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING PA 90-001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A FREESTANDING SIGN AT
LEW DOTY CADILLAC/OLDSMOBILE DEALERSHIP AT 6301 SCARLETT COURT
WHEREAS, Wade McClure, representing Lew Doty Cadillac/Oldsmobile filed an
application for a Conditional Use Permit to locate a new freestanding sign on
the site at 6301 Scarlett Court; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said
application on February 20, 1990; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects
as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has been
found to be categorically exempt under Section 15301, Class 1; and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the application be
conditionally approved; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports,
recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does
hereby find:
1. The use is required by the public need in that it provides business
identification to the general public for an auto dealership facility in
the City of Dublin.
2. The use will be properly related to other land uses and transportation
and service facilities in the vicinity, as it will be commensurate with
the present use of properties in the industrial zoning district.
3. The use, if permitted under all of the circumstances and conditions of
this particular case, will not materially affect adversely the health or
safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or
improvements in the area as all applicable regulations will be met.
4. The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or
performance standards established for the district in which it is to be
located. The use is consistent with the intent of the zoning district
and with the General Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby
conditionally approve PA 90-001 Lew Doty Cadillac/Oldsmobile Freestanding sign
as shown on the plans labeled Exhibit A, submitted to the Planning Department
on January 3, 1990, and subject to the following conditions of approval:
EXHIBIT C PAGE LOF
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with
prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use, and shall be
subject to Planning Department review and approval.
1. The double faced freestanding sign shall be limited to the following
dimensions:
a. Maximum Sign Area: 205 square feet (102.5 square feet per face)
b. Maximum Sign Height: 27.5 feet
c. Front Setback: 35 feet
The sign is to be located within the landscaped planter area as indicated
on the site plan and landscaping on the site shall be maintained in a
viable and well kept manner at all times.
2. Within 30 days of the approval of this use permit, the Applicant or
Property Owner shall remove the existing "Cadillac-Oldsmobile" window
signs from the front side of the building. Any new or existing signs on
the site shall conform to the City of Dublin Sign Ordinance.
3. Within 30 days of the approval of this use permit, all building permits
for the proposed freestanding sign shall be secured and construction
commenced within 90 days.
4. This approval shall become null and void, in the event the approved use
ceases to operate for a continuous one-year period.
5. This use shall be subject to Zoning Investigator review and determination
as to compliance with the conditions of approval on an annual basis.
6. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-
90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or
conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1990.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-2-
PAGE L' OF
'
III,
--
I 41,111
! •-,'r'-÷ .4 3 i 1
, I .
Pit-•J-- .
I
11,
.,....• 1111P ----,..
i. .
V Vi'.-114" t -
„.
-I' .-I , .
,
# . *.g.
,, It /, ,i.,.: ,-.:'
k! '- a
Ai,
....v. , - ,‘ 1 .
0-
f ;—
1
ana
-111V —71
1 I
1
.1 '
.
--4.-
4,--
-
4.i I'1 Ik
OD. i •4‘
2 lirlill ' -4--
40
• 1..
...t% • t
c alt,-;,/ri,1 :14 1 -I,
•,4;
, r
, 03 4 , ,7-7" .,, 1 . ,. .
, r
rAtIr
1-••!' ' . c.
Ti' ••.:k ' L.I, '4:Pr =, g ' 1 .1‘•
1-
1-1 -.-- I.
\-....4
_ 1 .
' 1
—rt
:1 (k c% 11 ••• 1 , (s 1 I L ,
...L. :1= . • .--- .
1 1 ss,--, - . o 1 41 -'\ qii • _ •
• \ •,. - ,.•-; , 1 i I _,
•,,, , _,,..4,,mmi .42// I .
VII F- 1 •\-' : 111111111-t I . 1 41.1111WMPB
IQ Ar...
..CP42
111- -;- b- c / -oT i'------ -1: I ,,• 'd 1
. „ , , ,
_
—II
g )'
r• 7-
A
—1, 1
k-
- 71 ,1 ,---iit- i•-",. , .411r1
-----, " 11, N 11.._ —21.1516- -::' .""v -0 r.
V."
r 1•X
— I- , 1.,... --
/. ,
1 ..t_4775-45 ,1* ••••1
(IN
1 i
- q I
F•••3 /> ni
— I
1 -
Z (r) r" ' I •' -- ATTACHMENT 1
co
2 o t.1 •
--P.•
! F-.!
!..co—ca— 1
l 'i5111 I 111111111
I
, i al'''2'1 i cl:rk. IIINENIMB
-
•
•
I _
_ ! , N.\ is�/ ! 3
/�;', ' 11 �;( 1 I','
J - %1 1 i i� I+—
i 1 -...'
- '_ ... I i''' N \SSN ?"
1/1
l
1
1 — ,
I
I
II . /
U1 1;,
V _ mil\'r
I I
5_ „. .
I �
' ,..
/ ..„
C7 ; I ,
„R I •
. rE ; ,.•.
. . i f.‘ V,
I /
C9 1 \GA
1 ----c
DOUGHERTY RD. _y_`f�
- 811 .
�--
�' ' .J-c. /1
1 �� I F '
_ 1 - r n
�` 1 ?% 1 u r
'1 •• r. __ _
7• �: z j a '' -n cn I m to m O �
• j '1 < I c.. L. o, H
MI -I I C- m 1 m , G :
D n o I N 171 D a, Z > 7
�`_ O N . i
I --.. m
• L •1 �` rr C
I ..
• C — n -c n -' r \\
> I \
n > n •n I
r. Q •
r.. N , Ir C I �^
r =
n o � '� I C1 -• 5
r w e Z O \ z D
N N
N Oc as \` z
CN Cs ` Z
q -----------•--......._
n
TASSAJARA RD. - _
ATTAGHMENT 2. _.,
. .
. . .
I e�. /,
'�"'A'°" n PART OF THE
m �I' , o CITY OF SAMINA . ZONING MAP
r." ink c J�" " DUBLIN �_� THOMPSON INc CITY OF
-, _ e a THE
_ DUBLIN
1
r Iw p..G.�...a t—..a[y....• wsl�
m ,• ' l r,u 1IN CAI Iff1RNIA
PAGE OF'
WADE MCCLURE
1026 SAN MIGUEL RD. • CONCORD, CA 94518 • (415) 689-5456
R CEtVLD
JAN U 3 1990
DUBLIN PLANNING
Planning Department P� 10-O0l
City of Dublin
California
Re: Sign Approval for Lew Doty Cadillac, 6301 Scarlett Court
Gentlemen:
This request is for a freestanding sign 35 feet high. The proposed
sign is to be a standard interior-illuminated Cadillac-Oldsmobile
sign as supplied by General Motors throughout the dealer network.
The sign consists of one 11 ft.3 in. x 11 ft.3 in. panel which dis-
1 plays the names of the autos sold at the site with the dealer's
name at the bottom. There is a second panel which is 3 ft.3 in. x
3 ft.3 in. and which displays the GM logo. Colors are as follows:
11 ft.3 in. x 11 ft.3 in. - background white
Cadillac - dark blue
Oldsmobile - burgundy
Dealer's name - dark blue background with white letters
GM logo - dark blue background with white letters
Structure - dark blue with polished stainless steel
We are requesting permission to locate this sign 50 feet back of
the front property line and 1 foot inside the property line on the
east side of the property. The proposed sign is to identify this
site from the freeway. We feel this exposure is necessary due to
this business serving a regional need. The location we are request-
ing is necessary to allow the sign to be seen from the freeway and
to be located within a planter without disrupting the parking lay-
out as approved by the city when the property was developed.
The potential benefit that the city could receive is that customers
would be able to locate this site with little effort and without
ATTACHMENT 3
PAGE It OF II
emor
Planning Department -2-
City of Dublin
having to drive around the City of Dublin or stopping to ask direc-
tions. We are hopeful that additional sales to out-of-town customers
will result from this freeway exposure, thereby increasing the sales
tax revenue to the city.
Very truly yours,
Wade McClure, Permit Agent
WM:ac
PAGE�r7 OF 1�
WADE McCLURE
1026 SAN MIGUEL RD. • CONCORD, CA 94518 • (415) 689-5456
January 30, 1990 RECEIVED
JAN 3 1 1990
DUBLIN PLANNING
Project: Variance Application for Freestanding Sign at
Lew Doty Cadillac, 6301 Scarlett Court, Dublin
Special Circumstances:
This site is different from other auto agencies along Highway 580 in
that it is close to the Hopyard Road overpass and off ramp.
Scarlett Court curves to the northwest in front of this site, making
the southwest corner of the property approximately 80 feet farther
from the freeway than the southeast corner of the property. This re-
quires the sign to be located as far to the east as possible to allow
it to be seen by potential customers traveling east on Highway 580 as
they pass under the Hopyard Road overpass. By locating the sign on
the easterly property line, we reduce the angle of vision to the motor-
ist traveling Highway 580 as well as locating the sign closer to the
freeway.
Prior to the reconstruction of the Hopyard Road overpass and the re-
alignment of Scarlett Court, a freestanding sign located anyplace along
the front of the property would have been seen from the freeway.
Special Privilege:
We are not requesting any special privilege to allow more or higher
signing than other auto agencies but only to have similar signing that
is located to best serve the dealer and the public. The other auto
agencies do not have any special needs similar to ours as they are
located on sites that are generally parallel to the freeway.
Detrimental to the Neighborhood:
This sign will not be detrimental in that it is similar to other signs
located along the freeway and will appear to the public the same. By
granting the requested variance to the side yard setback, the sign
will have less impact on Scarlett Court than if the height was reduced
and the sign was placed in the front planter.
ATTACHMENT F
PAGES OF
1 -r. - -
; , 1 1 1 . .
. _7]
al
,I'/ II ILIK \3 \�I }_ = L_ III I
1rJ ,'y r I I I I i/� Iyiz i(iii: j_ii r,..
g II
4 CM
" I } — 1 '. , { III Jame r.
1 I f 11 I I —� 1 ,� r swanson
�cu...:r. ail I I Il . 1 1 i I 1 ;l.• 1rw 't ,, ,-`--
•
. iL A.L _I.k landscape
architect
1. N• 415-283-0972
❑.�� 4— 939 a..Np....
1_?H
i I I I I I L I I i I F :'' I I ! ._z WIG
ryan.,aMbmY
T—a
t—� I H
SI KI I 'y )
i I • ,
�`r-t..,...,kI
aC
ii-11-...
i ) -- 11...
.,,, . 1:4.,
_ a
_
, 4 .'... Ar kict/if
Liwo
/ I
/� /'• ',M'I;.t Ir .._
� I IleI FL
1�.� _ .
1 l c�
/% / , r.,, u ,___
— ei� J Y
( uro g
V / r / nr i i ,-I — _
1 i ' V / A
L 0,,,, / ,RoPc,, 00 Sj1N i ,'
r _ _ I
A i s 7, _ i •!1.( p�
, 4Y� 1 1 G_
,s,-i /1 SETBAr E� �LP<I� rl f I G� PL/xt I yo, ��;
C) y
du141t `-.CL 1u;1—C
1--3 fcr- t 11F �,,,,., L L I4 rigipmsep stud . upokirtot4 _
......
RECEIVLD
IJC4IVTS JAN 0 3 1990 crb
DUBLIN PLANNIN
{ 1- ..,.. _...
r
` > Cz
` �
, /\
i 5
r
11 m =
1 o
o r.-
I .__,...„
En T
w
O (�
is
' 4') m
m 0• 4.
1. -I Si Z. `i n
w t.
I n
1 /v
r. 1
1 y
1 + P- re. O
n -i ZRI t
►
b . 1
o
m
4
b\
�1
L1
'))! \
7
\
d i9 �Gl�/�E"'7 y AZ
m \\ I ��
bta
^ ° 4
ME
ATV HMENT 5.0
REtElVLD-
m J A N 0 3 1990
- Q APP111 /..- Moeda sibt4 DUBLIN N PAGE r- /0
CITY OF DUBLIN
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: February 20, 1990
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff IL
PREPARED BY: Maureen O'Halloran, Senior Planner p4 oq4
SUBJECT: PA 89-050 First Western Development, PD Planned
Development Rezoning
GENERAL INFORMATION:
PROJECT: Rezoning request to rezone the site from C-1 to PD
Planned Development. Establishing development
standards, permitted and conditionally permitted
uses.
APPLICANT/
PROPERTY OWNER: First Western Development
3970 Mt. Diablo Boulevard
Lafayette, CA 94549
PROPERTY OWNER: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Western Office
Metropolitan Plaza, 6th Floor
101 Lincoln Center Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
Attn: James Drewry
LOCATION: 7450 Amador Valley Boulevard
ASSESSOR PARCEL: 941-305-8
PARCEL SIZE: 7+ acres
Parcel A: 5.91 acres
Parcel B: 1.09 acres
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Retail/Office
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC
PLAN: Development Zone 8, Restaurant/Specialty Retail
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE: C-1 Retail Business District
Commercial Retail
ITEM NO. COPIES TO: Applicant/Property Owner
[PLNG-07:PC89050] PA 89-050/General File
PAGE_1__OFLt.,
r , /1 �1
SURROUNDING LAND
USE AND ZONING: North: Church/Office - PD
South: Mixed Retail - C-2
East: Flood Control Channel/I-680 - C-1
West: Amador Plaza Road/Restaurant & Mixed
Retail - C-1
ZONING HISTORY:
Fall 1968, S-276: approval was granted for development of the
Handyman Store. Approval for the outdoor nursery was withheld
pending a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to the C-1 District.
November 19, 1969: The Alameda County Planning Commission
approved Conditional Use Permit Application C-2105 allowing
development of the open-air nursery adjoining the Handyman Store.
July 2, 1970: The Alameda County Board of Supervisors approved
the appeal for S-276 and Variance 4852 allowing use of a 36 foot
high, 280 square foot freestanding business identification sign
for the Handyman Store.
June 26, 1972: The Alameda County Planning Director approved
S-440 and Variance Application V-5800 to allow development of the
current sporting goods store. Action on the Variance provided
for a Numerical Parking Variance.
June 20, 1985: The Dublin Planning Commission approved PA 85-026
(Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests)
allowing the enclosure and remodel of a portion of the open-air
nursery at the northeast corner of the Handyman Store.
March 2, 1987: The Dublin Planning Commission approved PA 87-009
(Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests)
allowing Circuit City Stores to refurbish the vacant Handyman
Store (including enclosing a 5,700+ square foot nursery area) and
to construct a freestanding sign with a height in excess of 20
feet located approximately 40 feet from the front property line.
March 16, 1987: The Dublin Planning Commission approved PA 87-
034 (Conditional Use Permit request) for a car stereo
installation facility in conjunction with the proposed Circuit
City Store refurbishment of the vacant Handyman Store.
October 5, 1987 - PA 87-096: The Dublin Planning Commission
denied a subdivision request and denied without prejudice a Site
Development Review request to construct a 10,000+ square foot
commercial building.
June 27, 1988 - PA 87-159.1: The Planning Director approved a
Site Development Review request to construct a 10,000 square foot
commercial retail building.
-2-
PAGE2OFM
November 14, 1988 - PA 89-159.2: The Dublin City Council
approved a Tentative Parcel Map to create two parcels from one
existing lot and Variance for substandard effective lot frontage
on Parcel B.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
Section 8.31 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance establishes the
intent of the PD District and sets forth the procedures for
establishing PD districts.
Condition #1 of Resolution No. 144-88 approving the Variance and
Condition #2 of Resolution No. 145-88 approving the Tentative Parcel
Map required the property owner to apply for a PD Rezoning prior to
final map approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The City proposes to adopt a Negative
Declaration which finds that the proposed project will not have a
significant impact on the environment.
NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the February 20, 1990 hearing was
published in the local newspaper, mailed to adjacent property
owners, and posted in public buildings.
BACKGROUND:
In November 1988, the City Council approved a Tentative Parcel
Map and Variance application for the First Western Development site.
Approval of the application divided an existing 7+ acre site into two
parcels, one of which had substandard effective lot frontage (created
a flag lot type parcel) for which the Variance was granted. A
condition of approval for both the Variance and Tentative Parcel Map
required the Applicant to submit an application for a Planned
Development Rezoning. This application is in compliance with that
condition of approval.
Site Development Review for the site to allow a 10,000 square
foot retail building was approved in June 1988 and is currently under
construction.
ANALYSIS:
The purpose in rezoning the site to a Planned Development is to
establish provisions/development regulations specific to the project
site, which would not be addressed under an existing zoning district.
The proposed Planned Development Rezoning addresses circumstances
unique to the site including the flag lot, substandard lot frontage
and infill development.
The intent of PD District PA 89-050 is to 1) create an area in
which commercial development on separate adjacent parcels function as
a single shopping complex and 2) to provide an area for specialty
shopping and restaurant uses with pedestrian orientation encouraged.
-3-
PAGE.41.OF_L
The proposed Planned Development uses are consistent with the
City's General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan. The proposed PD
District establishes permitted and conditionally permitted uses
providing a distinction between full service restaurants and fast food
restaurants.
Development standards for the proposed PD District are consistent
with the Downtown Specific Plan establishing maximum building height,
floor area ratio and parking, in addition to the typical types of
development standards found in conventional zoning districts the
proposed PD District establishes a clear zone (see Attachment 1 of the
draft rezoning resolution) in which no building may be constructed.
This prevents future development from occurring directly in front of
the new building currently under construction on parcel B. The
proposed PD District also establishes an area in which development may
occur in the future (see Attachment 1 of the draft rezoning
resolution).
The proposed PD Rezoning establishes sign regulations generally
consistent with the City's Sign Ordinance. However, the rezoning
permits only one freestanding sign on parcel A and prohibits
freestanding signs on parcel B.
There are two provisions addressed in the draft PD District which
Staff and the Applicant disagree:
1. Existing Freestanding Sign: The Applicant proposes to
permit the existing freestanding sign to be relocated or replaced with
a similar sign (size, shape, configuration) at a new location on
parcel A in the event future development in the northwest portion of
the site (corner of Amador Valley Boulevard and Amador Plaza Road)
causes the sign to be relocated. The Applicant proposes that the
relocation be subject to the property owner and City agreement.
Staff's position is that any relocation of the freestanding sign
must comply with the City's Sign Ordinance and General Provisions of
the Planned Development. This ensures that the sign's height and area
will be compatible with the relocation and will be consistent with
other freestanding signs in the City. Staff's position is represented
in the rezoning draft resolution.
2. East Elevation (Parcel B) Wall Signage: The Applicant
proposes to allow wall signage on the east elevation (facing I-680)
the new building currently under construction subject to conditional
use permit approval.
The draft resolution prepared by Staff prohibits signage on the
east elevation, in that the east elevation does not constitute a
frontage under the City's Sign Ordinance definition of primary or
secondary frontage.
Staff recommends approval of the draft resolution prepared by
Staff.
-4-
PAGE OF L2-
RECOMMENDATION:
FORMAT: 1 ) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation.
2 ) Take Testimony from Applicant and the public .
3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public.
4 ) Close public hearing and deliberate.
5) Adopt resolutions relating to PA 89-050 First Western
Development PD Rezoning, or give Staff and Applicant
direction and continue the matter.
ACTION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the
draft resolutions recommending City Council 1) approval
of the Negative Declaration (Exhibit B) and 2 ) approval
of the Planned Development General Provisions and PD
Rezoning (Exhibit C) and recommend the City Council
make findings in compliance with AB1600 (Government
Code 66000) subject to City Attorney review.
ATTACHMENTS :
Exhibit A: Plans
Exhibit B: Resolution Negative Declaration
Exhibit C: Resolution General Provisions/PD Rezoning
Attachment 1 : Negative Declaration
Attachment 2 : Location Map
Attachment 3 : Draft Rezoning Ordinance
-5-
OF 7,
s. ii IP
h r-Y7
r-s 1
_
1 , st ., . ‘.„,.„.._vor.............„.„44r,.___
,
i ' ' I '
. I ,. = - -,
,4 1 '..-:i' '' 1:•'
.0...'. b 17. 4. '0
..v.1„ ;la 01
'1-. .ii% ...,st - 0
f:Iti -1
•-: ,,,i.‘. f., .... i-,A,... .
.\\ z
10
IS*
mx
-nsx s le 549
.rz r i
ri
li 1
.. ,
.‘. F. 1 i, 1.:,-;-__ .. . __ I, .
. .-0. 1 .;;..- =
W . .., •,.,•-
,„ , in! , _ .. ___,__ , . t —1 i : .__,,„! • ...,_ PARCEL A t
..r.,--.
" fia. •- -L.2.*-2-
..77-•
' I 3 , ' 1177•77; :::. - !- - --;-..'- '772,410-r---° .
-7- 0
,...• •
i PARCEL B '.. ;,,,• • !' •-...-,..,:--.4. :k -0
.P- n;..i.—':•;..';.i -! ',..- "4.., - • /I . 1 t,
z..11 •- , :i;1 ;.!'•.' . :
1
" CLEAR.; -
. ! ''':; 1-:"
° '0 . :! a . '.!--,,i..:. :; 1 `... ZONE ••••""
r. .., ,i ,!;.:,.• . , ...---, c..„..
, > ik-' - %-* °
Z ,1
A 11 :
1
:i•—--- • g :,.."-
•:.....-• '.:
as...: ,.....--__.. _ • ,',3 ... 1-... Allilki 1
fl i' tiii; IpiptIli; 11 I!1 f-- , .•. • .....- ...6 ._,
ilik\-\' owi....... tirei_4..
u 1 ';34 g Ela: eiiq ;Rt 0 i ' . , •.....,
..-- ".--,4 ..°I .ii
, r . . , ,,
,...., „_, ri.--,, / DFELIvTELILR0EpmENT ....,
--- L , ....: 's, 3 '--4 '
1 A'arpgF : 2! , grst . :.,,,.:
P:: 1-2LIE pl F
,--- I tiA 5i g'TiRr. li ii .
z- AREA ..--
,
igg 111g11.1 1.'g i2 -4- liv 4; 1 . 4
, 1111:40', pi
tz;
4DOR v 'k;
0(4E1, s="7•- 41 .1
:, r rtrr ri rr-r- ARD 1 - !:
\\\
1 IliNlei Ni N iR Rg 1 i ; ' li i f f OtE 1 i;
',.
41 1 ii I; I' i Ao 3 _Oar _: r 3: IA gr r f 6 1 g a'1 cc:11,!i r4i ir Ai ol r 3 i: 1 " rrr
151 E rrrFtri
j 1111;;;Ip ;Ng 4 'r 1; : g A i - f., ... ,
-In; ------------------\
t1115 l 12 1 11! 1 2 t
Ili i, g i
,D-osria,(21-
a
II Ili; !pi g! ; i ? 1 r ?A 81-050 FIRST TER kw vses Aote ge.. r........4-
nisiq :11 4 i Es E5
• A1111411 Iii i
i i iii t 11i iiii iii 1 PAGEL:F.42
_....V i
.......
1 ;, •
• ;.
ht
s -
i-- 2 -
/ •+ /e -
—Ilr
' - ..
.\,, ,
,
, ,,, ,,, - - , - u, , ,.
i_ , , ,‘ .
, ,M!T, , ,
,),
, . \ i
i O r. r-• ' -
>-
, •.\., • 1
; rill
• ill . (,. . .i,
U.I. s- ..• ; I4
j i i 4 1111) t• ‘
N. I
1 .,
tr ral.11 "4
•-•
1 111 1. 0._1'..,0 ..: , <
v , p.,..4
r..
A T.„ , • 7 •
...,_ , ,
.' s,„.
N
, . :=3
,k-/...i- ti...,
11.
•
--1
' \
. _.•
THIS DESIGN AND DRAWING IS THE kvirres.ke-Ctett-r )
• 4SIEr/J5
AND CANNOT OE USED IN PART OR
A
2.....t,
WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
PA 89s- as 6 i--=‘Rsr
-
IriBITN r_Ly 'll'iii-N4-, -
1PAti 22_OF_Li.
, . /....N .0...k,
E Jo Z 'ONINNSilil Nil%.4
6861 7 lir
_Zi3A11311
I,
I
\3: '
• i
I I
I. 1
i
•ll ::
. .
I ...‘ .
I .
• . r•:-.. 1,,
L.. 1 I
. .
I .—--i :- 4-.. i •
%s• I ,
--.1 .. 0:I
i I ' ' •
•
1 A :- • 1
(u I
. •• ,
•
1 • . • '
11;1 1. , I• •
_
. I •
.. ••.:
t 1 . •
I • . I
j I
I Li , • .
..... t
• . • I.
`-- 1 1 I.
[1! ___'d-- • •
EL ..
1
. .
• ri 1
• Li
. 1
. . . t .
_i LI • !
,
1
, 1 .
........
•ejjki
I7--._ - I i ......
F 11 i r/
-.1
i • -. 14''
.1 - •
i ONIIII
•••••
i 1
1 I I! I P-•1
•IP
1 ---- - -. • [ - .- :1 \l
.._
i 1
r k s-rate% •%e..i.rost...f
! , ri ____1•• ____
T .I A
I I
:I; !
1---- 111 l, , _?R, aciz-Q50 icces1- tatr-ofierrt ) 0L,JeS4,1,0%.__ I
PAGE..sz._OF.L.2.—
t I
INI
.•••••.,
• NI
t.-‘.
• NI
•
*
•
•
• i I
V .
. .
!i •
- --
Ii-
1.
I I 1 1
1-
- ...
C'.
I i
__ ,...
I
II
i.
, .--.
----- IIJ .
• -• 1
? - • - .ri---- El:
--11 I •
1 .
_
11 '
i
1
_--,
In
..
.
......„„o
—1-1 .
. . .
.
;ui,1 •11
• 1 • .
• ..._....
I
-
_L
=II _I
•
!--- il
t--;,,, ;
1 •
,
. 1 . N._ . • , .
.
.
- I: . •1 . • .
•
f 1 '
---0
. .
• ''. .
•-,-,--,-.,-,-
---
H .
. •
. . .
f•
7 . .
—1 I .
•
_ 1 •
e ;. ,
..._._,
1---- Ll • .• •
• .
o
---1[_-] ..
. .
/ ii v3
--io
-----II- -
r - [- -
f r 4 0
1 ,
)
•-•
1 i
t 4,
=In
•N
ii tit
i
.f. r
. .:;
,.;
Ili]
al
+..1.
III .0
ti
- ir I 11,.' • -
1 4,
. 1 . .1 ' •q
11-
1 ,
ii. .
r ,
,i,•,:,,
Mr , .
.
''REPKtYg_Q:
Jilli ma 1
_ .
.19
. k(=-,,----
1.1
A 4. #
IL
cp(48 ..p5-0 Fiez. 3 of
,31&.--Jok
hd-u•
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CONCERNING PA 89-050
FIRST WESTERN DEVELOPMENT REZONING APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the applicant Rick Hess representing the property owners, First
Western Development and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, filed an
application to rezone the 7+ acre site on the southeast corner of Amador Valley
Boulevard and Amador Plaza Road from C-1 to PD, Planned Development; and
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended
together with the State's Administrative Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Regulations, requires that certain projects be
reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documents be prepared;
and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been
prepared for PA 89-050; and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Planning
Commission recommend that the City Council rezone the property to a PD, Planned
Development District, allowing a general range of specialty retail shopping and
restaurant uses, along with site specific development criteria, that would be
consistent with the goals and objects identified in the Dublin General Plan and
the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commision did review the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance and considered it at a public hearing on February
20, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission determined that the project, PA
89-050, will not have any significant environmental impacts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission
recommends that the City Council find that the Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance has been prepared and processed in accordance with
State and Local Environmental Law and Guideline Regulations, and that it is
adequate and complete.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1990.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
t7r.aF'C
�@SO
Planning Director Ne-%.
`TA ffi-OSO r-« rt-,x-sue e 2,....F zoot6_
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE SITE FOR A
PD DISTRICT AND ESTABLISH FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR A PD, PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT REZONING CONCERNING PA 89-050
FIRST WESTERN DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the applicant Rick Hess representing the property owners, First
Western Development and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, filed an
application to rezone the 7+ acre site on the southeast corner of Amador Valley
Boulevard and Amador Plaza Road from C-1 to PD, Planned Development; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on February
20, 1990; and
WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects
as required by law; and
WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Planning
Commission recommended the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration of
Environmental Significance Commission Resolution No for this project,
as it will have no significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Planning
Commission recommend that the City Council rezone the property to a PD, Planned
Development District allowing a general range of specialty retail shopping and
restaurant uses which, along with site specific development criteria, would be
consistent with the goals and objectives identified in the City's General Plan
and the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports,
recommendations and testimony herein above set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does
hereby find that:
1. Rezoning the property to a PD, Planned Development District, will
be appropriate for the subject property in terms of providing a range of
allowable and conditionally allowable uses which will be compatible to existing
and proposed land uses in the immediate vicinity and conforming to the
underlying land use designation; and
2. The rezoning will not have a substantial adverse affect on health
or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious
to property or public improvement; and
3. The rezoning will not overburden public services; and
4. The rezoning is consistent with the Dublin General Plan and
Downtown Specific Plan.
ckC50•.
k•eAku�,,pp
cavisiertt
PAGE1L OF i 9 I?A8R-050 fieerOgrauDa.vtop»w{-
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVES THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby
recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance rezoning the First Western
Development (PA 89-050) site to PD, Planned Development District, and adopt the
following general provisions:
1. PA 89-050 PD, Planned Development District is established to provide
areas for specialty retail shopping and restaurant uses with pedestrian
orientation encouraged. It is the intent of this PD District to create
an area in which commercial development on separate adjacent parcels
function as a single shopping complex. Uses and development of property
within this PD District shall be subject to the provisions of the C-1
District except as modified through the General Provisions for said PD
(PA 89-050).
2. The following principal uses are permitted in PA 89-050 PD District:
a. Retail - including but not limited to: books, clothing, shoes,
jewelry, appliances or specialty stores.
b. Full Service Restaurants - Non Fast Food
(Fast Food Restaurant means a relatively high-volume restaurant
providing seating facilities and serving take-out food such as
hamburgers, tacos, chicken or sandwiches. Fast food restaurants
typically serve prepared or rapidly prepared meals. Food is
typically served in disposable containers.)
c. Office - located above ground floor.
d. Service commercial - uses oriented toward serving the needs of
residents and employees in the area, including but not limited to:
Dry Cleaners
Barber & Beauty Shops
Tailor Shop
Camera, Watch or Shoe Repair
3. The following uses are conditional uses subject to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit:
a. Commercial recreation/entertainment - a public or private use or
development providing amusement, pleasure or sport operated
primarily for financial gain. Uses include but are not limited to:
arcade video games, dance floors, theaters.
b. Residential
4. Development within this PD District (PA 89-050) shall comply with the
following development standards:
-2-
PAGE Ia.OF.LL
a. Maximum permitted building height: 35 feet
b. Maximum permitted floor area ratio: .30*
* Maximum floor area ratio shall be on a district wide basis, not a
per parcel basis.
c. Setbacks - subject to Site Development Review approval. Parcel A
shall maintain a clear zone free of buildings extending from the
west property line of Parcel B westward to Amador Plaza Road (See
Exhibit A, area labeled Clear Zone).
Setbacks may be modified subject to review and approval of a PD
Rezoning.
5. Development within the PD District shall be subject to approval of Site
Development Review.
6. Development of any new buildings may occur within the northwestern
portion of Parcel A (see Exhibit A, area labeled Future Development Area)
subject to Site Development Review approval.
a. Maximum allowable building square footage of said building shall be
determined during Site Development Review subject to compliance
with City of Dublin parking, building height and floor area ratio
(site coverage) Zoning Regulations and General Provisions for PA
89-050.
7. Development in any other portion of the PD District inconsistent with the
general provisions for PA 89-050 shall be subject to Conditional Use
Permit approval upon the Planning Director's determination that the
proposed development will constitute a minor modification to the PD
District. Upon the Planning Director's determination that the proposed
development will constitute a major modification, said modification shall
be subject to Planned Development Rezoning approval.
8. Parking requirements within the PD District shall comply with the parking
requirements established in the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan.
9. All signs within PD District PA 89-050 shall comply with the regulations
established in the City's Sign Ordinance except as specifically modified
through these general provisions. The PD general provisions related to
signage may be modified subject to Site Development Review approval.
All signs shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning
Director prior to installation.
Parcel A
a. Wall Signs - existing wall signs shall continue to comply with
previous sign approvals for existing on-site uses, T.J. Maxx,
Circuit City and Oshman's. Any new signs or modifications
(modification does not include repair) to existing signs shall
-3-
PAGE/ OF
comply with the regulations established in the City's Sign
Ordinance including but not limited to sign area, height and
length.
b. Freestanding Signs - The existing freestanding sign shall continue
to comply with the previous freestanding sign approval for the
site.
1) Only one freestanding sign shall be permitted on Parcel A.
2) Any modification to sign height, area or location of the
freestanding sign shall be subject to review and approval of
the Planning Director.
3) Sign heights in excess of 20 feet shall be subject to review
and approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
Parcel B
c. Wall Signs - Wall signs on the approved 10,000 square foot building
on Parcel B shall comply with the following provisions:
1) Primary Frontage (West Elevation):*
Maximum Sign Area: 10% of tenant frontage surface area
available for signage not to exceed 335 square feet total
signage for the entire west elevation.
Maximum Letter Height (individual illuminated letters): 30
inches
Maximum Sign Length: 60% of width of tenant business space
2) Secondary Frontage (North and South Elevations):*
Maximum Sign Area: 7.5% of tenant's frontage surface area
available for signage.
Maximum Letter Height (individual illuminated letters): 24
inches (2 feet)
Maximum Sign Length: 10 feet
3) * Exception: Tenant wall signs for "KuppenheimeR" shall
generally comply with the plans dated received July 7, 1989,
prepared by United Sign Corporation on file in the Dublin
Planning Department and labeled Exhibit A.
-4-
PAGE L7 OF.1 r
Primary/Secondary Frontages (West and South Elevations)
Maximum Sign Area: 56 square feet
Maximum Letter Height: 28 inches - the K and R in
"KuppenheimeR" (individual
illuminated letters)
18.5 inches - letters in between K
and R (individual illuminated
letters)
16 inches - sign cabinet "Men's
Clothiers"
Maximum Total Height: 38 inches
Maximum Sign Length: 17 feet, 7 inches
4) Signage shall not be permitted on the east building
elevation.
d. Freestanding Signs - No freestanding signs shall be permitted on
Parcel B.
10. Development of any structure in this PD, Planned Development District,
requiring Site Development Review shall be subject to traffic mitigation
fees as set forth in the City's traffic mitigation fee ordinance or
resolution in effect at the time of development.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of February, 1990.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Director
-5-
PAGE S OF 2
NEGATIVE DECLARATION: PA 89-050 First Western Development PD Rezoning
(Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.)
LOCATION: APN 941-305-8
7450 Amador Valley Boulevard
Southeast Corner of Amador Valley Boulevard and
Amador Plaza Road
PROPONENT: Rick Hess
First Western Development
3470 Mt. Diablo Boulevard #A150
Lafayette, CA 94541
DESCRIPTION: Planned Development Rezoning from C-1 District to PD
District. The PD District establishes development standards
and conditional and permitted uses.
FINDINGS: The project will not have a significant effect on the
environment in that the PD Rezoning is a legislative action
approving the zoning and general provisions for the zoning
district. Subsequent development on the site will require
an environmental determination in compliance with CEQA.
INITIAL STUDY A copy of the Initial Study may be examined at the Dublin
Planning Department.
PREPARATION: This Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Dublin
Planning Staff (415) 833-6610.
SIGNATURE: DATE: February 14, 1990
Laurence L. Tong, Planning Director
PAb9-050 First tOisterhi
SACiatitill
3 I bed A ;
1111"warogill to\\\\\\\\11111411to .... .25
4,0V,°,
• \ \ \\\\ tea. ,• ,.,,_ \ . , T—; ..1',
o,- c_rf-
10
' .••.,AWOw \\ \\A‘ p0k #$141
'' '• ~ J u•.A•• `VM►I j� IIi
NIG
k.
__:_4.
•• 1 Ne # \ 1 KOLB PARK aaa.rp, ��' l_
( r ' FT
I V + , \ \
.Drat . .''. . \\\\\\\ , *Ate s . . .. __4
c. .,,.
° —�' 1 i; [ . (�'�
MI' /
i
� � \ \ \ FALCON SCM•• 't. ' .--_�
,� ! ' \ \\\\ �► tea. _- $.�� �-_ I �z
rill
r.• \ \ i e jçiiEEr
s1 \ \ O.
` :F i s_. _is ----------!
DIN SCM00l \ ti:1:1:1:+b \ - 7
\\ \\\ , ts.inalUiCs Oa
,1 ♦ "A \\\\\\\\ 141/ _ 1 II 11111 _ rr...c
wit
III* ,
\\\\\\ IS LI*
.----/ /, -:'a --- .-.---.-;-:'
. jar \
- 'i‘ *h_ . \\\\‘\\‘ 'Ilk ‘4"eti‘ ' 7---_,/ i ,, 1\-------
0 \__.: • . ,_.\ -----' _
00-` • 10 .7, 17`,,„ );.‘,..-
t -C l \ \ \ , �wrra
IN
i
. " S # -'--)\ \\\‘‘‘‘\ \‘ \V* . C I ..1 i
"\\''>::::.
\ \... \ \`‘\\\\ 41*`‘4A/ - -1':---' 7
, /
\‘ \ ‘\ * --;'-
iT1c \-
may. —� 1/ \.
On n ...,‘\\ \\:::.,„\\\ ,,, \C..,, ,,..i \,,,,,,\:- ...---
f- '-. la .AP . . , ,_..........,---:-- , \
Willi ii , ._ . .7„
w ...„, c.,,oph,... ,‘‘, \\\‘ 543....._i
1,011- ---''' -'. -1 iir: 0.1 OM.. I ' ;$=\ EZOMM‘
4s' �. so0 -- \ Flom ► \\ �\_ 1, \ s.
ii! ate• \ioLiiipp.irillk*e fv ,0 0\\.;v‘.•
/i
v‘La0\IP%.4;-o-o.p..‘;-_V._t',
rn
1.
_'_'_.\..:\11
4,
\/4,0
A\
,\\\\\\\•\c,,‘‘\,,‘
., ‘,s
. -,\'''-<:1,
fib. §-14D \\ \ )
.,.
;. .. cam \
34'1' \
.4 W \ \ \
PARK • LOCATION
11-
,. IM ACP
k , ,ft, ..., ,,, ,,,,,,, .,: :#„. , ,,.. .' ft
02-
.....9 I L i
� re,es.-0o FNCs WeiTt7e.ob• - - P
,ram ` N �;
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE
REZONING OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AMADOR VALLEY
BOULEVARD AND AMADOR PLAZA ROAD, 7450 AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD
The city Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows:
Section 1
Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Dublin Ordinance Code is hereby amended in
the following manner:
Approximately 7+ acres consisting of lands fronting along the southeast
corner of Amador Plaza Road and Amador Valley Boulevard, more specifically
described as Assessor's Parcel Number 941-305-8, to a PD, Planned Development
District, PA 89-050 - First Western Development, as shown on Exhibit B
(Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance), and Exhibit C (Approval,
Findings and General Provisions of the PD, Planned Development Rezoning) on
file with the City of Dublin Planning Department, are hereby adopted as
regulations for the future use, improvement and maintenance of the property
within this District.
A map depicting the rezoning area is outlined below:
f PARK
tZO�ri &
ATTACP,MENT
`IJ
'�,.J�- f2eZ�nctitS Drd#'^ PAGE�.L.L OFs�
Section 2
This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days from
and after its passage. Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its
passage, it shall be published once, with the names of the Councilmembers
voting for and against the same in the local newspaper published in Alameda
County and available in the City of Dublin.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this
day of , 1990, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
- 2 -
PAGE L`L OF 1:Z
CITY OF DUBLIN -m
MEMORANDUM
MEETING DATE : February 20 , 1990
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff
PREPARED BY: John Donahoe, Project Planner MJ)
SUBJECT: PA 88-010 General Plan Amendment - Dublin Boulevard
Extension (Modification of Plan Line) from the Southern
Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way to Tassajara Road
RECOMMENDATION: Continue this item indefinitely. (This item would
then be re-noticed prior to consideration by the
Planning Commission. )
The existing plan line of the extension of Dublin Boulevard from
the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way to Tassajara Road currently
lies approximately 1250 feet north of, and parallel to, Interstate
580 . This alignment was adopted as part of the City' s General Plan in
February 1985 .
Based on the results of previous traffic studies within the City,
as well as reviewing proposed improvements to the Hacienda Drive
interchange, it became apparent that the existing plan line may be too
close to Interstate 580, creating potential traffic problems in the
future.
The Planning Staff has been examining the realignment of the
Dublin Boulevard Extension and is currently reviewing several
potential alignments . These proposed alignments are being reviewed
for consistency with the conceptual land use patterns being addressed
by the East Dublin Extended Planning Area study as well as the future
land use plans of Camp Parks and Alameda County property. The
requested continuance will allow Staff additional time to coordinate
with the various agencies to determine an acceptable alignment.
ITEM NO. 8.41
COPIES TO: Planning Files