Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
6-04-1990 PC Agenda
•- Y n AGENDA CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting - Dublin Civic Center Monday - 7:30 p.m. 100 Civic Plaza, Council Chambers June 4, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 4. ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA 5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING - May 21, 1990 6. ORAL COMMUNICATION - At this time, members of the audience are permitted to address the Planning Commission on any item which is not on the Planning Commission agenda. Comments should not exceed 5 minutes. If any person feels that this is insufficient time to address his or her concern, that person should arrange with the Planning Director to have his or her particular concern placed on the agenda for a future meeting. 7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8.1 PA 90-034 Goodwill Trailer Conditional Use Permit Renewal request to allow the location of a temporary donation trailer at the north end of the Shamrock Village Shopping Center parking lot located at 7767 Amador Valley Boulevard 8.2 PA 90-015 B.P. Oil Co. Site Development Review request for the reconstruction of a service station and signage mounted on a new canopy and Conditional Use Permit request to allow the expansion of the use from a 4-pump station to a 10-pump station with a new rollover car wash located at 6400 Dublin Boulevard 8.3 PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation request to allow 300 multi-family condominiums/apartments on 17+ acres, 17 single family lots (custom home sites) on 10+ acres and 170+ acres of open space/parkland located at the western terminus of Dublin Boulevard 9. NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS 10. OTHER BUSINESS 11. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONCERNS 12. ADJOURNMENT (Over for Procedures Summary) DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEDURES SUMMARY WELCOME to the Dublin Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission is made up of five Dublin residents who have volunteered their services to the community. They were appointed by the Dublin City Council. The Planning Commission encourages and appreciates participation by Dublin residents. Regular meetings of the Planning Commission are held on the first and third Mondays of each month in the Dublin Civic Center Council Chambers, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin. TIME: Planning Commission meetings begin at 7:30 p.m. No new public hearing item will begin after 10:30 p.m., and the meetings will be adjourned by 11:00 p.m., except under unusual circumstances where the Commission votes to hear the item or to extend the meeting for 30-minute increments. ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: No action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda unless: 1) the Planning Commission determines by majority vote that an emergency situation exists, as defined in the Government Code 2) the Planning Commission determines by a two-thirds vote, or by a unanimous vote if only three members are present, that the need to take action arose after the agenda was posted; or 3) the item was included in a posted agenda for a prior meeting held within five (5) calendar days and was continued to the current meeting. ORDER OF PRESENTATION: After the Chairperson opens the public hearing on an item, the order of presentation will be as follows: 1) Summary Presentation by Planning Staff 2) Questions by Planning Commission 3) Comments by Applicant 4) Comments by Others in Favor 5) Comments by Those in Opposition 6) Rebuttal by Applicant if Necessary 7) Additional Comments by Staff as Appropriate The hearing is then closed and the item turned over to the Commission for discussion and action. The audience is not permitted to make any further comments unless invited by the Planning Commission. PUBLIC COMMENTS UNDER ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Any citizen desiring to speak on an item not scheduled on the agenda may do so under Oral Communications at the beginning of the meeting. After receiving recognition from the Chairperson, please state your name and address, then proceed with your comments. When an item not on the agenda is raised by a member of the public, the matter shall be deemed automatically referred to Staff unless the Planning Commission determines to take action as outlined in the section above entitled ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON A HEARING ITEM: On a public hearing or other scheduled item, the Chairperson will ask the audience for its comments, first from those in favor, then from those in opposition. After receiving recognition from the Chairperson, please state your name and address, then proceed with your comments. The Planning Commission wants to hear all citizen concerns. Each new speaker is asked to be brief, add new information, and not repeat points which previous speakers have made. The Planning Commission is particularly interested in the specific reasons why the speaker is for or against an item. Applause and other demonstrations are prohibited during public hearings. Such demonstrations tend to intimidate those in the audience who may have valid but opposing viewpoints. The Chairperson maintains the discretion to request the use of Speaker Slips and to limit comments. Anyone who does not want to speak may write comments on the Speaker Slip and turn it into the Planning Commission while the public hearing is still open. SMOKING CONTROL: Please do not smoke during the Planning Commission meeting. ITEM WITHOUT APPLICANT: If the applicant or representative fails to attend the public hearing concerning their item, the Planning Commission may take action to deny, continue, or approve the item. The item may be considered for continuance upon receipt of written notification of the applicant's inability to attend the hearing. CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 4, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff �/ PREPARED BY: David Choy, Associate Planner wolp SUBJECT: PA 90-034 Goodwill Conditional Use Permit Renewal GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit request to allow the continued operation of a self contained 25' long, 8' wide, 13' tall trailer for use as a donation drop-off station located in the northeast portion of the Shamrock Village Shopping Center parking lot. APPLICANT: Goodwill Industries Art Collins, Donation Services Manager 1301 30th Avenue Oakland, CA 9460 PROPERTY OWNER: Ms. Barbara Cross P. 0. Box 2247 San Rafael, CA 94912 LOCATION: Northeast portion of the Shamrock Village Shopping Center parking lot 7767 Amador Valley Boulevard ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-173-4-5 PARCEL SIZE: .84 acres GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial/Retail/Office COPIES TO: Applicant Owner File PA 90-034 ITEM NO. re PAGE_1._,OF 13 DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: Development Zone 9 Amador Valley Boulevard Commercial EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: C-1 Retail Business District Commercial Retail Shopping Center SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: C-0 Administrative Office/currently undeveloped R-S-D-20/Multi-Family Residential Apartments South: C-1 Retail/Dublin Plaza Shopping Center East: C-1 Medical Office West: C-1 Shamrock Village Retail Shopping Center ZONING HISTORY: PA 86-130: On January 5, 1987, the Dublin Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow a donation trailer in the Mervyns' parking lot at 7117 Regional Street (one-year approval). PA 87-174: On January 18, 1988, the Dublin Planning Commission denied a Conditional Use Permit to allow a donation trailer in the parking lot of Howard Johnson's hotel site. On appeal (February 22, 1988), the City Council upheld the Commission's denial of the requested use permit as it was determined to be inappropriate use on the site with the hotel and nearby restaurants. On October 27, 1988, the Planning Director approved a request for Site Development Review waiver to allow for minor exterior alterations for Goodwill Stores to the existing commercial building within the Shamrock Village Shopping Center in connection with a building permit request. PA 88-118: On November 8, 1988, the Planning Director approved a Site Development Review request to install three new fascia mounted signs for the Goodwill Store located in the Shamrock Village Shopping Center. October 28, 1988 - January, 1989: Interior and minor exterior alterations made on an existing 5679 square foot vacant commercial space within the easterly portion of the Shamrock Village Shopping Center to allow for the operation of a Goodwill Industries Store Retail Outlet. February 6, 1989: The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 89-003 approving PA 88-150, Goodwill Industries Donation Station Conditional Use Permit for a 25 foot long truck trailer located in Shamrock Village Shopping Center parking lot near Goodwill Store, 7767 Amador Valley Boulevard. -2- PAGE OF 13 March 27, 1989: Appeal of Planning Commission action taken on February 6, 1989. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 36-89 modifying the Planning Commission action approving PA 88-150 Goodwill Industries Donation Station Conditional Use Permit for a 25 foot long truck trailer located in the Shamrock Village Shopping Center parking lot along the north side near Goodwill Store, 7767 Amador Valley Boulevard. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: The Downtown Dublin Specific Plan establishes policies and standards to control development within the downtown area. Section 8-48.2(g) Conditional Uses: C-1 Districts allow "recycling centers when operated in conjunction with a permitted use on the same premises" subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district in which it is located. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Categorically Exempt, Class 4(e), Section 15304 - Temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effect on the environment NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the June 4, 1990, hearing was published in the local newspaper, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. ANALYSIS: The Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit renewal to allow the continued operation of a Goodwill Donation Station in the northeast portion of the Shamrock Village Shopping Center. The donation station consists of a self-contained blue and white truck trailer standing 13 feet in height, with a length of 25 feet and a width of 8 feet (see Exhibit A). The City's Zoning Ordinance does not list a specific category for this use; however, the use is considered similar to a recycling center which requires a Conditional Use Permit. The truck trailer is located along the north easterly property line and occupies approximately four parking spaces. Three additional parking spaces were added east of the trailer to compensate for the occupied spaces. However, the loss of one parking space does not create a problem since the property continues to comply with on-site parking requirements as established in the Dublin Zoning Ordinance and the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan. PAGE-3 oF.L .01 The trailer's location does not reduce visibility to the existing businesses as it is located at the rear of the Shamrock Village Shopping Center. The existing Goodwill Store and Medical Office screen views to this portion of the parking lot and businesses. Staff evaluated other locations on this site for potential trailer placement as part of the original application. Other locations were more visible to nearby residential areas or public streets. A location outside of the marked parking spaces, north of the lamp post, would not be possible as the lamp post restricts the required room necessary for the trailer. Placement of the trailer perpendicular to the property line would create traffic safety problems as the trailer would project into the required drive isle area. The hours of operation for the station are 10 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. seven days a week, and will continue to remain the same. A Goodwill employee is required to be present at the trailer during operating hours. During non- business hours the Donation Station trailer doors are to be secured and locked. After hours a truck will continue to make pick ups of any items outside of the trailer during the evening. During the day a pick-up delivery vehicle is available on an on-call basis. When the donation trailer is full it is replaced by an empty one. The purpose of the station is to receive donations of used items and to provide vocational training and employment services for the handicapped. Conditional use permits for temporary uses have historically been approved for a period of one year, after which time, the Planning Commission reconsiders whether or not the use is still appropriate for the site and the community as a whole. This particular use, and the designated location, appear to be appropriate for the property. No complaints have been received by the Police Department or the Zoning Investigator regarding the Goodwill donation trailer. This site contains the Goodwill store as well as other retail activities. These uses coincide with one another in a supportive fashion. Additionally, supervision and monitoring/maintenance of the donation station occurs in a timely and responsive fashion since the Goodwill store is located nearby. For these reasons it is not necessary to require the Applicant to renew the Conditional Use Permit on an annual basis, through a formal application. The annual review of the donation trailer operation would be performed by the Zoning Investigator to ensure compliance with the Conditions of Approval. The inclusion of a Goodwill Donation Station on this site creates an appropriate and compatible mixture of land uses. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit renewal application to allow the continued use of the Goodwill donation trailer. -4- PAGEIOF I3 RECOMMENDATION: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Draft Resolution Exhibit B, regarding Conditional Use Permit PA 90-034, or give Staff and Applicant direction and continue the matter. ACTION: Adopt Resolution Exhibit B approving PA 90-034 Conditional Use Permit renewal for Goodwill Donation Station ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Site Plan and Elevations Exhibit B: Resolution approving PA 90-034 Conditional Use Permit Background Attachments: Attachment 1: Location Map Attachment 2: Applicant's Written Statement Attachment 3: Photographs of Existing Donation Trailer -5- PAGE 5 OF l± • S1Rl�R�p 'p2kJE—� �bri�. :`:3tQ� f . . fie.- �,1�'n • • _.... :. VA _ • �r4 y'Y ./// " / _ 5-t to ZZ`,. . .\: ......s. ,....,.\\:.\\ :\ , .\—"--\— . .:I: 7:::.1114.1.:71•71) •• //"/Z. ..\:-.. ..--:r:-• :74:43-17::: N.::2:O.-\' ' -• i' i. t • t} ���` ,i / 1. //. r gAV 21t1.^.,:! '0j2� 1�• �i �F!L ._— - "�1 �-� • . 1 .c .i!c g: t� Q G ai • 1 •• 4 1 • r-:-:--.4 :, , ,, ,..._..• -2 -- , • a oA. :. . • \ .. .. ?:0:1011,\ • .'..-. 1 ;'..X\\ . .k,_i .' / :i ce��.. >) y� EIVEn • . :\ �' ••�a ' MAY -9 1990 • \\. \ r /:. rugllN PLANNIiw._. • \.,'' APAGE OF ,3 • EXHIBIT . • P6 90-o3y Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay y m DONATION STATION oW 1 7 3) w a, Z as g J w I d w_ U >- ? m 25' I [0.111111 ��> BACK VIEW � -- h 4( SIDE VIEW (FRONT) I (REAR) 116, WWI • LENGTH:25' HEIGTH: 13' WIDTH: 8' RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 90-034 GOODWILL INDUSTRIES DONATION STATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL FOR A 25 FOOT LONG TRUCK TRAILER LOCATED IN THE NORTHEASTERN PORTION OF SHAMROCK VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PARKING LOT NEAR GOODWILL STORE, 7767 AMADOR VALLEY BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Arthur Collins, representing Goodwill Industries, filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit renewal to allow the continued operation of a 25 foot long truck trailer for a Donation Station in the northeastern portion of the Shamrock Village Shopping Center parking lot near the Goodwill store, 7767 Amador Valley Bouleard. WHEREAS, Section 8-48.2 of the adopted City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a Donation Trailer in a C-1 Zone; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the request is categorically exempt in accordance with the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending the application be conditionally approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard and considered all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that: a. The use is required by the public need in that it provides a location for the general public to drop off reuseable items. b. The use would be properly related to other land uses and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity in that the site contains the Goodwill Store, as well as other retail activities, which coincide with one another in a supportive fashion. 1 HIBIT B PAG c. The use, if permitted under all circumstances and conditions of this particular case, will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property or improvements in the area, as all applicable regulations will be met. d. The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clause or performance standards of the General Plan and zoning established for the district in which it is to be located in that conditions have been applied to insure conformance with the zoning regulations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby approve said application as shown on attached Exhibit A subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to issuance of building permits or establishment of proposed land use activity and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 1. PA 90-034 is approved for the Donation Station truck trailer which shall be located in the northeast portion of the Shamrock Village parking lot areas near the Goodwill store and the Medical Center building, as generally depicted in Exhibit A. 2. The Donation Station shall not interfere with or obstruct vehicular access or movement within the parking lot. 3. Hours of operation shall be from 10 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., 7 days a week. After hours, the trailer shall be locked and secured. 4. Parking lot and building lighting shall be maintained and operational during non-daylight hours. 5. The Applicant, Goodwill Industries, shall be responsible for maintaining the Donation Station and parking lot surrounding the truck trailer in a clean and orderly manner. No items shall be left outside the truck trailer for more than 24 hours at a time. 6. The Applicant shall maintain on-site signage indicating hours of operation, drop-off instructions for after hours and a telephone number for use in case of emergency. Said signage shall be limited to two signs, each a maximum of 8 square feet of area. 7. A minimum of three (3) additional parking spaces shall be maintained at the northeast portion of the site to offset that which is occupied by the donation trailer operation. 8. Screening trees shall be maintained in front of the trailer location within the planter area along Starward Drive to soften visual impact. -2- PAGE c, OF 9. The trailer shall remain in close proximity to the street light to screen the bottom of the trailer and contain after hours items discarded on site. 10. The Applicant shall maintain a 6' tall vinyl clad chain link fence to screen the bottom of the trailer and contain after hours items discarded on site. 11. This approval shall become null and void in the event the approved use ceases to operate for a continuous one year period. 12. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms of conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. 13. On an annual basis, these uses shall be subject to Zoning Investigator review and determination as to compliance with the Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -3- 13 PAGE OF.. ^ ; b . ''' --'. ‘ V-'6•triri LI ir 3 ,IV.1_,),:z;i7 • : \:,0 . \ 1 VI 1 \ ..z . \,, <Kcs.._.:7-7-, ,..c, ;:,,,,. T, > • \ tT / •I ,fm _ i; <7.: 2-0 ‘ .. ':-... . 7.4,, I ; C C 1 "' 1 _r't'• \ N9 .d 1 4 � '` _ _- +> niG C ry ,Na 7ci� 1 \ "C Vf _,•( ; • \� n , -----• • .�\\fin `• \ \ �� N _, Ate;._. .,, ,,,, , • % „, : ,, , ...,,, vat.(1) % \ . ,..gt 7. . ,s, . . „ .\ . ri) n • ... .... ,. . _t .,,_______,„._\... „. ‘ .,, ,,, .,:‘,..\ 1 I \ ..1..>I1)•t A PART OF THE' I. LI ;• ' '-1 1 o Sa C(TY OF SANTINA ; ZONING h1AP ; 11 .-----RE C E I ;THC_I -03 i• :�; -9 1990 + MAY --' 1 - ATTACHMENT a 1 DUBLIN PLANNING PAGE„(L of J� Supplement to City of Dublin Conditional Use Permit Application The project entails the continued operation of one, 200 square foot trailer as a Donation Station for Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay. The station has been in operation at its current site, 7445/7667 Amador Valley Blvd., Dublin, California, in the rear of the Shamrock Shopping Center, and in proximity to our existing Goodwill Store since March, 1989. The station provides direct support for the business operations of Goodwill Industries as a collection point for the used goods which we retail in our Goodwill Stores. As a community service, the station provides Dublin residents a convenient method for donating their used goods to Goodwill Industries. From a business perspective, however, the Donation Station is in fact the lifeblood of our nonprofit organization. It is our primary method of collecting our merchandise, i.e, used goods. Sales proceeds from our business (e.g., Goodwill Store) operations provide sole financial support for our on-the-job training and job placement services that serve vocationally handicapped adults in the greater East Bay. The direct benefit to Dublin is related to the extent to which local residents may participate in our human service programs. Otherwise, the Dublin operation helps support the entire business and therefore vocationally handicapped people from throughout Alameda, Contra Costa and Solano counties. As an additional community benefit, the donation of used goods to Goodwill Industries helps to keep those goods out of the waste stream and ultimately out of landfills, or dumps. The person who donates a piece of used clothing or a household item to Goodwill, rather than throwing it away, is helping to protect the environment by "recycling" that item and preventing it from becoming garbage. The community wins, the environment wins, and ultimately, handicapped and disadvantaged people win by benefiting from Goodwill's human services programs. RECEIVED ATTAcHmEN.rz mAy NLA NING PAGE. .OF I3 LVU� ILL ', i T1 ►Ai \ Cti; - ^> ll�LIJJ . r ` • gaodw II DIY ,_.. ..r „.. _..,_ . •w t • . ,. ....._ , . ___ _ i +. ' •a:' MIA r .ice _ ;!" w�" — I r: _ hsisss L y N3}Z.TtA-N,..)V.5, iCI- -) 1:: 311'1 SC'Li itttic!cc eC' % 1—Ru;✓'I\ 1. Wfea -KIV e CYAR"W ,4. rkt 1,k., f i.,• i I ; 1+ S. 0 y J i 3 (�e. ,�{ ;1�=w F;corn �AE���t�G �c; cc1JTk..A .‘,/IC....,AD r--ZO(o, St 44..Q‘.-/ah,. -bp, ATTACHMEN . 3 RECEIVED PAGE 1F; M A. ! 9 1990 ()/Ps" 10 r 057- CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 4, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff �y PREPARED BY: David Choy, Associate Planner K/% +,um SUBJECT: PA 90-015 B.P. Oil Company Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review request for the reconstruction of a service station with a new 1,215 square foot sales building, an automatic car wash, and signage on new canopy. APPLICANT/OWNER: Brian P. Duffy Senior Real Estate Representative B.P. Oil Company 2868 Prospect Park Dr., Suite 360 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6020 LOCATION: 6400 Dublin Boulevard ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-550-9-1 PARCEL SIZE: .67 acres GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Retail/Office and Automotive EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: M-1, Light Industrial District Gas Station Use SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: C-2 Unocal Service Station South: C-2 Dublin Station Shopping Center/ M-1 Rental World East: M-1 Miracle Auto Body West: C-2 Pak-N-Save Center ITEM NO.8,2 COPIES TO: Applicant/Owner File PA 90-015 n ZONING HISTORY: August 4, 1971, the Zoning Administrator adopted Resolution Z-314 approving C2334, Conditional Use Permit for Mobile Oil Company to operate a Type A service station in an M-1 zone. August 4, 1971, the Zoning Administrator adopted Resolution Z-315 approving V5473, Variance to 1) reduce rear yard setback from required 20' to 10' and 2) install one freestanding sign of 64 square feet in an area where no freestanding signs are otherwise permitted. March 10, 1990; Site Development Review approval granted for Sign Program for B.P. Oil Company service station. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-65.1 Service Station Type A states that a) the building site shall not have an area less than 10,000 square feet with an effective lot frontage on at least one street, not less than one hundred twenty (120) feet, and; c) no building shall be less than forty (40) feet from any street line. Section 8-51.3 states that in the M-1 District the following may be considered as conditional uses: j) Service Station Type A & B, and; 1) other uses which are found by the Planning Commission as may meet the intent of the district and the requirements of Section 8-51.8 of this article, such as car washes. Section 8-51.6 Yards: M-1 District. Front - 20 feet, rear - 20 feet, side - 10 feet. Section 8-20.6 Building means any structure erected for the support shelter or enclosure of persons, animals or property. Section 8-60.37 Yards: Exceptions: Projections Permitted Therein a) Eaves, or any other architectural features may project beyond the front, rear, or side wall, a distance not greater than two (2) feet. Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district in which it is located. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The City proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance which finds that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. -2- PAGE£..OF_,._ NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the June 4, 1990, hearing was published in the local newspaper, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. ANALYSIS: British Petroleum Oil Company is requesting Site Development review approval to modify their existing service station located at 6400 Dublin Boulevard. The proposal involves razing the entire existing site which includes: two gasoline islands and two round canopies; an existing 1,419 square foot (33' x 43') two-bay service station building used for office, convenient food sales and auto repair; and the removal of three underground fuel tanks. The Applicant is proposing to reconstruct the site to include: a 43' x 103' canopy, with a 1,215 square foot sales/storage building and five gasoline islands located underneath the canopy; a separate 36' x 20' automatic car wash; the installation of three 10,000 gallon double-walled fiberglass fuel tanks; and the installation of signage on the face of the canopy. A Conditional Use Permit is required to permit the expansion of the service station use at this site, as well as to allow the location of a car wash within the M-1 zone. The General Plan designation for this site is Retail/Office and Automotive. This project is consistent with the intent of the General Plan. The existing service station received approval from the Alameda County Zoning Administrator on August 4, 1971 for Mobile Oil Company. The site layout has remained unchanged, with a change of ownership to BP Oil Company occurring last year. The proposed project is located within an existing M-1, Light Industrial zone. Although car washes are not specifically stated as Conditional Uses within this zone, Section 8-51.3(1) of the Zoning Ordinance gives the Planning Commission the authority to approve uses which are found to meet the intent of the district and the requirements of Section 8-51.8, Performance Standards in the M-1 District. In conformance with Section 8-65.1(a) of the Zoning Ordinance, which requires an effective lot frontage for service stations of 120 feet on at least one street, Staff has determined the east property line, along Dougherty Road, to be the front lot line, the west property as the rear lot line, and the south and north property lines to be side lot lines. Setbacks within the M-1 zone, except as modified by Section 8-65.1(c) of the Zoning Ordinance, are as follows: front yard - 20 feet; rear yard - 20 feet; side yards - 10 feet. Section 8-65.1(c) of the Zoning Ordinance, which establishes design standards for service stations, requires a forty foot building setback from any street line. Both the front, (east) and side (north) property lines abut streets, Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard, respectively. The Zoning Ordinance does not provide a definition for street line. Staff has made the interpretation that street line means face of curb. Under this interpretation, the site plan as proposed, meets this forty foot setback requirement for service stations. -3- PAGE 3 OF The Public Works Department recommends that the easternmost existing driveway on Dublin Boulevard be eliminated. This leaves three driveways for access to the site; one off of Dublin Boulevard and two off of Dougherty Road. This site is similar to the Chevron site which was recently renovated at the northeast corner of San Ramon Road and Dublin Boulevard. At the Chevron site, two of the four existing driveways were closed, those closest to the intersection, to help improve traffic circulation. This site, however, will retain both driveways along Dougherty Road. The adjacent Rental World currently has an access easement across the British Petroleum Oil site. The two driveways on Dougherty Road allow both uses to retain their individual access. Landscaping is proposed along the north property line, replacing the driveway on Dublin Boulevard and connecting the two existing landscape islands. Additional landscaping is also proposed along the south and east property lines. A trash enclosure is being added at the southwest portion of the site. The existing handicap ramp, which provides access from the south side of Dublin Boulevard across Dougherty Road, will be removed and replaced with sidewalk, curb and gutter. This ramp currently has a barrier with a "No Pedestrian X-ing" sign attached to it. Pedestrians wishing to cross Dougherty Road must do so on the north side of Dublin Boulevard because of the signalized right turn lane from Dublin Boulevard onto Dougherty Road. The pay phone proposed along the south property line should be moved closer to the building and to the designated parking spaces. The present location encourages motorists to park within the drive aisle on site, potentially impeding on-site circulation. The final location of the pay phone will be subject to review and approval of the Planning Director. A Sign Program was recently approved for this site, permitting a freestanding monument sign, a legal price sign and wall signage. Included within this Site Development Review application is a request for approval of new wall signage. The monument sign and legal price sign will remain unchanged. Signage is proposed for the face of the new canopy, the carwash, and the new market. Individual, acrylic faced, internally lit, yellow letters, 31" in height are proposed to be mounted on the west and east side of the 42" green canopy face. The maximum letter height permitted by the Sign Ordinance without Site Development Review is 21". Larger letter heights are permitted only through approval of Site Development Review. Staff recommends that a maximum letter height of two feet be approved for the canopy (see Attachments 7 and 8), consistent with the signage approved for both the Chevron Station fascia, located at the northeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and San Ramon Road, and the Shell Station fascia, located at the southeast corner of San Ramon Road and Alcosta Boulevard. The proposed wall sign for the car wash and the market, consisting of 12" letters painted directly onto the wall, are in conformance with the requirements of the Sign Ordinance. The proposed project represents a more efficient use of the property. The installation of the double-walled fiberglass underground tanks will help create a safer environment by reducing the risk of gasoline leakage and ultimate groundwater contamination. This project has been reviewed by other -4- PAGE OF_- city departments and affected agencies (Public Works, Police, Fire, Building, County Health, DSRSD, and TJKM, the traffic consultant) and all applicable conditions of approval are included within the draft resolutions. The project as proposed is in compliance with the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review requests by British Petroleum Oil Company. RECOMMENDATION: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Resolutions relating to PA 90-015 B.P. Oil Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review, or give Staff and Applicant direction and continue the matter. ACTION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the Draft Resolutions approving the 1) Negative Declaration (Exhibit B); 2) Conditional Use Permit (Exhibit C) and 3) Site Development Review (Exhibit D) relating to PA 90-015. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Plans submitted by Applicant Exhibit B: Draft Resolution approving Negative Declaration Exhibit C: Draft Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit Exhibit D: Draft Resolution approving Site Development Review Background Attachments: Attachment 1: Location Map Attachment 2: Applicant's Written Statement Attachment 3: Standard Site Development Review Conditions Attachment 4: Standard City of Dublin Non-residential Security Requirement Attachment 5: Typical Public Works Conditions of Approval for Commercial/ Industrial Site Development Review Attachment 6: City of Dublin Landscape Maintenance Agreement Attachment 7: Canopy signage with 31" letter height Attachment 8: Canopy signage with 24" letter height Attachment 9: Negative Declaration 5 -5- PAGE OF ss \s o1,ror. 45.19 _ _�y4 0 wosrisc ' �\ • •'+�t\\ a Q \ r;= I •S > , ,-_,\ o I oa 01, \:•:3 /e A'c \\ IN ' C) \ \ 11 O. 4:: '''', 4) \ #' el I # -- -.(\s \ — . Z I % fl s P z. \ ..x' \ 9,k, ‘.% .4"DA \ `4 \ \a '8a "2 \ \. A ; r. I ,t \ A.. S's' F i• 6 r' CliP , • ' / ( i 1 i J i . / s,.., /. / —,,,. „ I \\\ \ .� /// U iv b I / /1 / f a8»iY OO a / f / 411-' /U/ // ',' 9,. O i �4) _ 4 01.1 0. Jar C 101.I)_� / / 91 1 // / yG r / ..,L, ,iii,i / / p v--) / . ..„, s., 3 1 /\J / . .,,,...., / ` ,,5 O / t �'7•''" O / • J� / z !2. . 9 plippillaeleik"..... , x g '''' ;Nq _ ,,AECEIVED a coW v mcn zm � oxi� L •7. m Zr - Ir_ �( f ExHIBIT A , I z -D3 ,Ar �s ' v ZK= o s Y n DUBLIN PLANNING X i�09-001-11120 DOUGHERTY AND DUBLIN PAGE ate.. °1 l m 3.-6• 1 7d�iI1, �.K. ,,,T I' r.. _ 1 111IL _]11V 11, Inil ,�ll m.PAST .K O.M 1)< . . 6.7 FRONT ELEVATION Q ROY N.M ra ACN.L LOCAl101.Or CAMay aa.a . rill am F 11 Fr 1 am (NUN — "°' Ille [1' S11 ir P-1 ^� ,—kMIN� 1� 1 4,O.[O. V . FAINT pIWI NM MY MCAI SIDE ELEVATION t r .- _\ �eMwv II Car Wash 1 I r fra IO.—f I I G. li rn \-.,A._ BP OIL CO. r-r r ,... r A, I DERETSIGN M D MARKETING DESIGN ANO ENGINEERING !lit , 1111 SITE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION �� MAIM DOA CO:, I �'�w.DOOM DOUGHERTY AND DUBLIN ENTRANCE ELEVATION 1 DUBLIN, CA. DWG. NO.- 04-001-11120 'REV.:_ N sc.0 if-,- MAoc r rMM e��c��,-11-RI lets. •~ 1 • • O MATERIAL SCHEDULE cc.1'R'A•co...o. rl.�{�r1LL• 14'I M O.f0..00r1 f . Iv..Y0..4f A K M11<..1r WWII,rt 1..01 ltiR. 11'.p.rwM IKIl.Ka 0 K .I.Gti rgI{.f Y.0 HI iw.Ywb[M .II f .grvpMl rt .MvY0.K11.0< ' lr 1 # /rnK.lrlf<KRN<"al. cr Ix[mwueoutl w�.rr w[ wva<n 4..1 tou.aa rw..0 vw.a R01 AM 1tw OW MR Ka 11di(i PM) a-11 w.11.r1d.+K. f/r 1ra.nmlxx.wnt 1w..°'G11f/l 1W[-1r to. � NOTES D11 WA■ u.ac .1[nw11q 1le1 u .0 '��0wT.: ) , .0 •lou^ : r/Laop)) .w ILL<1Kw♦ l G< 11 11X w{.M• 11111 anf wet uw.rn WI.. • I f''' aw o.o �u iwm�li:. wrY v.o.ra t1....u .t la 1....va.1+ .ro w1.m 71.:. r. i 1) i 1 Ku i iio� / t. root-c..att K0I)fro.l w.rn.s S000 d 10 IV. ro..ru.it-In 10.n. i 1r 1 F A - --1! 1i! ----,� y 11n1. ME MI 11.1111111.1111 111 [[.R91111 IL j�Xlr ..rf Its W1dail: ) C3 ` <.11 11 FOR:r.aa fc.XOul to IIIt)G..{f.l.In Y...CNII[ BP OIL CO. r ..1.. caa lOXVA. RET�II IWtKE11`IC • DES1CN MD ENGINEERING _Fr '. ♦ IKIl ILF:pe'7...1 rtIID.fwlma nwi<{01..E COK.f )w-C IAl[. AMA.'.O.0.•--• U • M.11ld rartY. w.11\OffJ[f1l.O. ..~W YK.�-<KT. [ w<- BP BULLNOSE CANOPY —.rr.lart.t pw-a-tai) T SICNACE in a_ n-!/r 0 NO.' V-OPJI-C RCV2_ wu__siY__�;r-.s_u — 7'L_iIl'lll ltncs:_r_ _ {o.{ i'.L=.tom ci —C= 1 - RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR PA 90-015 BP OIL COMPANY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 6400 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Brian P. Duffy, on behalf of B.P. Oil Company, filed applications requesting Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review approvals of a new service station with 24-hour mini-market, automatic car wash and signs to replace the existing service station located at 6400 Dublin Boulevard, more specifically APN 941-550-9-1; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was conducted finding that the project, as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the Negative Declaration at a public hearing on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find: 1. That the Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review for the project PA 90-015 will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline regulations. 3. That the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director EXHIBIT 150 ' . RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 90-015 BP OIL COMPANY SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE MART/CAR WASH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AT 6400 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Brian P. Duffy, on behalf of BP Oil Company, requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review of a new service station with a 24 hour mini-market, automatic car wash, and signs to replace the existing service station located at 6400 Dublin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, Section 8-48.2 of the adopted City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a Type A Service Station; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said application on June 4, 1990; and z WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and a Negative Declaration has been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. 90- ) for this project as it will have no significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the application be conditionally approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth; and WHEREAS, the proposed land use, if conditionally approved, is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area and will not overburden public services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that: A. Continued use of the existing Type A service station with the addition of a convenience market and automatic car wash provides for the public need by offering a range of services for the community. B. The uses will be properly related to other land uses, and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity, as the proposed uses are compatible when compared to the type and nature of operations typically found in light industrial district areas and the uses currently in operation in the immediate vicinity. EXHIBIT PAGE 2.42._OF__. C. The use will not materially adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, as all applicable regulations will be met. D. The uses will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the District in which it is to be located in that the use, as proposed, is the remodeling of the existing use for the site, and is consistent with the character of the surrounding area as well as the light industrial district. E. The approval of the Conditional Use Permit will be consistent with the Dublin General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve PA 90-015 Conditional Use Permit application as shown by materials labeled Exhibit A (Site Plan, dated received May 1, 1990, Site Elevations and B.P. Bullnose Canopy Signage dated received February 22, 1990, prepared by B.P. Oil Company Retail Marketing Design and Engineering) on file with the Dublin Planning Department, subject to the approval of the related Site Development Review and to the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building and grading permits and establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 1. This approval is for a 24 hour self service gas station and market, and for an automatic car wash. 2. The Applicant/Property Owner shall be responsible for cleaning up and disposing of the market generated trash to maintain a clean litter free site. 3. No loudspeakers or amplified music shall be permitted outside the enclosed building. All activities associated with the food convenience store shall be conducted entirely within the enclosed building. 4. This approval supersedes all other conditional use permit approvals for the site. 5. This approval shall become null and void, in the event the approved use ceases to operate for a continuous one year period. 6. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8- 90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms of conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. 7. On an annual basis, these uses shall be subject to Zoning Investigator review and determination as to compliance with the Conditions of Approval. -2- PAGE L Or PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -3- PAGE L OF._r._ RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 90-015 BP OIL COMPANY SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE MART/CAR WASH SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW INCLUDING SIGNS AT 6400 DUBLIN BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Brian P. Duffy, on behalf of BP Oil Company, requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review of a new service station with a 24 hour mini-market, automatic car wash, and signs to replace the existing service station located at 6400 Dublin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, Section 8-51.4.1 of the adopted City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance requires Site Development Review approval for structures of 1,000 square feet or more placed in the M-1 District; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said application on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and a Negative Declaration has been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. 90- ) for this project as it will have no significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the application be conditionally approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth; and WHEREAS, the proposed project, if conditionally approved, is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area and will not overburden public services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that: A. All provisions of Section 8-95.0 through 8.95.8, Site Development Review of the Zoning Ordinance, are complied with. B. Consistent with Section 8-95.0, this project will promote orderly, attractive, and harmonious development; recognize environmental limitations on development; stabilize land values and investments; and promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of uses or erection of structures having qualities which would not meet the specific intent clauses or performance standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and which are not consistent with their environmental setting. EXHIBILP. . PAGE.LL OF- C. The approval of the project as conditioned is in the best interest of the public health, safety and general welfare. D. General site considerations, including site layout, orientation, and the location of buildings, vehicular access, circulation and parking, setbacks, height, public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment for the development. E. General architectural considerations, as modified by the conditions of approval, including the character, scale and quality of the design, the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials and colors, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting, and similar elements have been incorporated into the project in order to insure compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of adjacent buildings and uses. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve PA90-015 Site Development Review application as shown by materials labeled Exhibit A (Site Plan, dated received May 1, 1990, Site Elevations and BP Bullnose Canopy Signage, dated received February 22, 1990, prepared by B.P. Oil Company Retail Marketing design and Engineering) on file with the Dublin Planning Department, subject to the approval of the related Conditional Use Permit and to the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building and grading permits and establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 1. The existing freestanding signs on-site (the monument and legal price sign) shall remain as approved by PA 89-071. The proposed wall signs shall be located as shown on Exhibit A, and shall conform to the following: Canopy: Maximum Sign Area, Primary frontage (east): 36 square feet Maximum Sign Area, Secondary frontage (west): 27 square feet Approved Sign Area: 2x(2'x4'): 8 square feet per sign Market: Maximum Sign Area, Primary frontage (north): 14.5 square feet Approved Sign Area (4'x1.5'): 6 square feet Carwash: Maximum Sign Area, Primary frontage (east): 17.5 square feet Approved Sign Area (7'x1.5'): 10.5 square feet Any modifications shall be subject to the provisions of the Sign Ordinance. 2. A minimum of one 40 gallon all weather trash can shall be provided between the two parking spaces located to the west of the car wash. 3. A minimum of four (4) on site parking spaces shall be provided. Continuous concrete curbing is required for all parking stalls. All parking spaces shall be double striped. -2- PAGE.(`_OF._. 4. The Applicant shall eliminate the existing driveway cut on Dublin Boulevard nearest to the Dublin Boulevard/Dougherty Road intersection and construct public improvements along Dublin Boulevard consistent with Exhibit A, as submitted by the Applicant, and is subject to review and approval of the Public Works Director. 5. All driveways shall have 5 foot flat flares. 6. The applicant shall remove the handicap ramp at the middle of the curb return at Dublin Boulevard and Dougherty Road. Replace it with Alameda County Standard Portland Cement Concrete curb and gutter and 8 foot wide sidewalk. The existing "No Pedestrian X-ing" sign shall be replaced one inch from face of curb. 7. The Applicant shall comply with the City of Dublin Site Development Review Standard Conditions (Attachment 3) and the City of Dublin Non- Residential Security Requirements (Attachment 4). 8. The Applicant shall conform to the "Typical Public Works Conditions of Approval for Commercial/Industrial Site Development Review" (Attachment 5) including, but not limited to Conditions 1, 3-7, 10, 15, 20, 22-26, 28, 29-35, 38-40, 42, 45-47. 9. The area at the southerly property line shall be delineated as waiting area for the proposed car wash. The method of delineation (such as pavement marking and directional signs) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 10. The location of the pay phone, which shall be required on site, shall be moved from its position along the southern property line to a location closer to the market and the designated parking spaces. The exact location of the pay phone shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. ARCHITECTURAL 11. Exterior colors and materials, particularly the architectural trimwork, for the new structure shall be subject to final review and approval by the Planning Director. All ducts, meters, air conditioning equipment, and other mechanical equipment on the structure shall be effectively screened from view with materials architecturally compatible with the main structure subject to review and approval of the Planning Director. DRAINAGE 12. A grading, drainage, and improvement plan shall be prepared by the Applicant and shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. 13. Where storm water flows against a curb, a curb with gutter shall be used. The flow line of all asphalt paved areas carrying waters shall be slurry sealed at least three feet on either side of the center of the swale. -3- PAGE L_OF 14. Downspouts shall drain through the curbs of the concrete walks around buildings. No drainage shall flow across property lines. DEBRIS/DUST/CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 15. Measures shall be taken to contain all trash, construction debris, and materials on site until disposal off site can be arranged. The Applicant shall keep adjoining public street free and clean of project dirt, mud, and materials during the construction period. The Applicant shall be responsible for corrective measures at no expense to the City of Dublin. Areas undergoing grading, and all other construction activities, shall be watered, or other dust palliative measures used, to prevent dust, as conditions warrant. POLICE 16. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Police Services requirements, including, but not limited to: a. No racks, placards, banners or merchandise shall be placed so that it obstructs the view through the windows. b. A security program to deter theft and burglary, which may include the use of a drop safe and video camera, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Police Services. 17. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall supply written confirmation that the requirements of the Police Services have been, or will be, met. FIRE PROTECTION 18. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Dougherty Regional Fire Authority (DRFA) requirements, including, but not limited to: a. Prior to the removal of the existing underground storage tanks, the proper permits must be secured from the Fire Department. b. The installation and testing of the new underground tanks must comply with the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code, Article 79, Division 6 and NFPA 30. c. The installation and testing of all piping, valves, and fittings must comply with the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code, Article 79, Division 7 and NFPA 30. d. All other conditions of construction and operation of this facility, including manually operated pump master switch, must comply with Article 79, Division 9 of the 1985 Uniform Fire Code. 19. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall supply written confirmation that the requirements of the DRFA have been, or will be, met. -4- PAGE /17 Of_. DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT (DSRSD) 20. The Applicant shall submit plans to the DSRSD for review of water and sewer facilities. 21. The proposed automatic car wash shall incorporate a water recycling system to reduce overall water consumption. The proposed water recycling system shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Director. 22. Prior to the issuance of building or demolition permits, the Applicant shall supply written confirmation that the requirements of the DSRSD have been, or will be, met. GRADING 23. A comprehensive soils report shall be prepared by a licensed geologist, identifying any geologic or soils hazard zones, appropriate mitigation measures and other recommendations. 24. The area outside the building shall drain outward at a 2% minimum slope for unpaved areas and a 1% minimum in paved areas (with a maximum gradient of 5%). IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AGREEMENTS, AND SECURITIES 25. The parking and driveway surfacing shall be asphalt and concrete paving. The project's Soils Engineer's structural pavement design shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 26. The Applicant shall enter into an Improvement Agreement with the City for any public improvements. Complete improvement plans, specification, and calculations shall be submitted to, and reviewed by, the City Engineer and other affected agencies having jurisdiction over public improvements prior to execution of the Improvement Agreement. All required securities, in an amount equal to 100% of the approved estimates of construction costs of improvements, and a labor and material security, equal to 50% of the construction costs, shall be submitted to and approved by, the City and affected agencies having jurisdiction over public improvements, prior to execution of the Improvement Agreement. 27. The existing concrete gutters at the back of sidewalk, catch basins, and pipes through the curb shall be cleaned, repaired, or replaced as necessary to function properly as required by the City Engineer. LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PLANS 28. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan (at 1 inch — 20 feet or larger), along with a cost estimate of the work and materials proposed, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed landscape architect. 29. Landscape plans shall indicate the general plant pallette with description of plant type, growth rate, and container size at planting. -5- PAGE.LZ OF 30. The Developer/Owner shall sign and submit a copy of the City of Dublin Landscape Maintenance Agreement (Attachment 6). 31. Planting and maintenance specifications shall be prepared and submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. 32. Landscaping at driveways and at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Dougherty Road shall be such that sight distance is not obstructed. Except for trees, landscaping shall not be higher than 30 inches above the curb in these areas. LIGHTING 33. Exterior lighting shall be of a design and placement so as not to cause glare onto Dougherty Road or Dublin Boulevard or onto adjoining properties. Lighting used after daylight hours shall be adequate to provide for security needs. Photometrics and lighting plan for the site shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Dublin Police Services for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. MISCELLANEOUS 34. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable building code requirements, including Title 24 relating to handicapped parking requirements. 35. The detailed design and location of the trash enclosure area shall be subject to review and approval as part of the project landscape and irrigation plans. The design of the trash enclosures shall reflect dimensional criteria deemed acceptable by the Livermore Dublin Disposal Service, and shall incorporate use of a 10' x 10' concrete apron in front of the enclosure to facilitate the District's mechanical pick up service. If wooden doors are utilized, the doors shall be trimmed with a heavy metal lip. Raised concrete curbing shall be provided inside the trash enclosure area to serve as wheel stops for metal trash bins to protect the interior walls of the enclosures. 36. All improvements shall be installed as per the approved landscaping and irrigation plans and the drainage and grading plans prior to the release of occupancy of the new structure. 37. The Applicant shall submit a demolition plan for the existing service station to the Alameda County Health Department for review and approval. Said plan shall include removal of the underground tanks, lab analysis of soils under the tanks, and a plan for correction if the soil under the tanks is found to be contaminated. Plans for installation of any underground fuel tanks shall be reviewed and approved by the Alameda County Health Department prior to installation. 38. Prior to the issuance of building or demolition permits, the Applicant shall supply written confirmation that the requirements of the Alameda County Health Department have been or will be met. -6- PAGEIgOF- 39. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8- 90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms of conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. 40. To apply for building permits, the Applicant shall submit six (6) sets of construction plans to the Building Department for plan check. Each set of plans shall have attached an annotated copy of this Resolution of Approval. The notations shall clearly indicate how all conditions of approval will be complied with. Construction plans will not be accepted without the annotated resolutions attached to each set of plans. The Applicant will be responsible for obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City agencies prior to the issuance of building permits. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -7- PAGE.L .OF.____ Su SIu.r ill l t t % 1 \\.: .14;74„...::::::. tjF4• \ \1 ,\ , \•"y 1 \ ��\ N Vi..'717;. • k ,,,, ',\ ---::,--;--- \ ii5: 11 1 O u St?\-\..cC // t •'.' v r• s s'''..."'v‘ ''''..."....• ....,.. ...' ill ,, , I.t, t ........',..... c AN 4....„ ,,';:,( \ ‘., ' :___--....Sc.--- ",--- - (-1 1167:2ilidr_ „c..-......---_,...-..........--- -----;„ ok 0,..-: iiiiiit'Ainitt P...., 1� ,7; s' 1 ;q / i o=.•I,wI•7' \ 11 ,,` ii:. :i -. 17.1 4, is?.::_ 1 1 , 1 S7/ it. - 11 I 1 .,_:': 1 w tp� C-IC• : ,I . g i,!..2 fi\ a i /.::: 6 2 .. 1;•.;,...; • r- /, ( <I - R+ � ; � N 1 _ - �_ __: -- - 'A PART OF THE-- :__ `�•1__ m 4 ,i1:-F CITY OF---•- ^^ SANTINA . --•ZONING MAP -1 II:-E o _ DUBLIN — ��, THOMPSON c� --TJ_IE_CITY Ot c ..P.:.j-.—_ - - - _ . ._-_-'— -- - - -.. -,:. - --DUBLIN . - I:----. ---I=-' — - — - - I--f - -----_- _ - ,.w�..r -:...-raw...._. BP BP OIL BP Oil Company Aetna Bldg.,Suite 360 • 2868 Prospect Park Dnve Rancho Cordova,California 95670-6020 (916)631-0733 R E C E I V E D February 20, 1990 Planning Department F EB 2 2 1990 City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Blvd. Suite D DUBLIN PLANNING Dublin, CA 94568 rik 90-0j5 RE:6400 Dublin Blvd. BP Oil Co. Dear Sirs: BP Oil Co. proposes to raze its existing service station facility located at the referenced address. That facility currently has an old two (2) bay service station building of 1,419 square feet. The building is used for office, convenient food sales and auto repair. The site has two (2) gasoline islands and two (2) round canopies. Our proposal calls for the retention of all existing driveways and existing street sign. We will raze the existing repair building and islands and canopies. We will construct a 43'x 103' canopy which will have a 1,215 square feet sales building located underneath the canopy. This building will serve as office, retail sales area (672 square feet) , storage and two (2) public restrooms. There will be fueling positions for ten (10) vehicles that can be served simultaneously. The site will also have a roll over car wash located in a 36' x 20' building (720 square feet) . The proposal provides for four (4) parking spaces (9' x 20'). Two (2) are located by the car wash for employees and one (1) on either side of sales building. These two (2) spaces were inadvertently left off the site plan. I have shown their location on attached Exhibit "A". The existing underground fuel tanks will be replaced by three (3) new 10,000 gallon fiberglass tanks. The purpose of this proposal is to replace a nearly 20 year old facility with a new, modern and efficient gasoline marketing facility. We believe that our design is very attractive and that it will improve the aesthetics of this corner, benefitting both our Company and the City of Dublin. Sincerely, ATTACHMENT 1rn P. DufPfy al oF CITY OF DUBLIN SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARD CONDITIONS All projects approved by the City of Dublin shall meet the following standard conditions unless specifically exempted by the Planning Department. 1. Final building and site development plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. All such plans shall insure: a. That standard commercial or residential security requirements as established by the Dublin Police Department are provided. b. That ramps, special parking spaces, signing, and other appropriate physical features for the handicapped, are provided throughout the site for all publicly used facilities. c. That continuous concrete curbing is provided for all parking stalls. d. That exterior lighting of the building and site is not directed onto adjacent properties and the light source is shielded from direct offsite viewing. e. That all mechanical equipment, including electrical and gas meters, is architecturally screened from view, and that electrical transformers are either undergrounded or architecturally screened. f. That all trash enclosures are of a sturdy material (preferably masonry) and in harmony with the architecture of the building(s). g. That all vents, gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc., are painted to match the color of adjacent surface. h. That all materials and colors are to be as approved by the Dublin Planning Department. Once constructed or installed, all improvements are to be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. Any changes which affect the exterior character shall be resubmitted to the Dublin Planning Department for approval. i. That each parking space designated for compact cars be identified with a pavement marking reading "Small Car Only" or its equivalent, and additional signing be provided if necessary. j. That all exterior architectural elements visible from view and not detailed on the plans be finished in a style and in materials in harmony with the exterior of the building. k. That all other public agencies that require review of the project be supplied with copies of the final building and site plans and that compliance be obtained with at least their minimum Code requirements. ATTACHMENT PAGE0a OF- 2. Final landscape plans, irrigation system plans, tree preservation techniques, and guarantees, shall be reviewed and approved by the Dublin Planning Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. All such submittals shall insure: a. That plant material is utilized which will be capable of healthy growth within the given range of soil and climate. b. That proposed landscape screening is of a height and density so that it provides a positive visual impact within three years from the time of planting. c. That unless unusual circumstances prevail, at least 75% of the proposed trees on the site are a minimum of 15 gallons in size, and at least 50% of the proposed shrubs on the site are minimum of 5 gallons in size. d. That a plan for an automatic irrigation system be provided which assures that all plants get adequate water. In unusual circumstances, and if approved by Staff, a manual or quick coupler system may be used. e. That concrete curbing is to be used at the edges of all planters and paving surfaces. f. That all cut and fill slopes in excess of 5 feet in height are rounded both horizontally and vertically. g. That all cut and fill slopes graded and not constructed on by September 1, of any given year, are hydroseeded with perennial or native grasses and flowers, and that stock piles of loose soil existing on that date are hydroseeded in a similar manner. h. That the area under the drip line of all existing oaks, walnuts, etc., which are to be saved are fenced during construction and grading operations and no activity is permitted under them that will cause soil compaction or damage to the tree. i. That a guarantee from the owners or contractors shall be required guaranteeing all schrubs and ground cover, all trees, and the irrigation system for one year. j. That a permanent maintenance agreement on all landscaping will be required from the owner insuring regular irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement. 3. Final inspection or occupancy permits will not be granted until all construction and landscaping is complete in accordance with approved plans and the conditions required by the City. PAGE°?OF___ I�'' ,--1' 1 CITY OF DUBLIN; ;� ��� %� PO. Box 2340, Dublin, California 94568 • City Offices, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin, California 94568 ..j,.it,���,, CITY OF DUBLIN NON-RESIDENTIAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS City Ordinance No. 21-89 1988 Building Code Section 4101 1. Doors. Exterior doors which are located at the rear, or side, or away from the primary entrance shall be solid doors with no glazing and shall be installed in metal frames. Exterior wood doors shall be solid wood construction 1 3/4" thick or hollow metal doors. 2. Locking devices. Exterior swinging doors which are exit doors as setforth in Chapter 33 shall have cylinder dead-bolt locks which shall be openable without the use of key, special effort, or knowledge. In Group B occupancies, a double cylinder dead-bolt lock may be used on the main exit door if there is a readily visible, durable sign on, or adjacent, to the door stating, "this door to remain unlocked during business hours. " The sign shall be in letters not less than 1 inch high on contrasting background. When unlocked the single door and both leaves of a pair of doors shall be free to swing without operation of any latching device. Doors which are not exit doors shall have the inactive leaf secured with flush-bolts at the top and bottoms. The bolts shall be hardened steel 1/4" minimum diameter and shall engage a metal strike plate to, a minimum depth of 3/8 inch. The dead bolts shall be hardened steel and shall have a minimum of a one inch throw. If the cylinder of the lock protrudes from the face of the door it shall be fitted with a cylinder ring geared so that it cannot be griped with pliers or other wrenching devices. Vehicle door, overhead doors, and sliding doors shall be secured with metal to metal locking devices which prevent the door from opening. 3. Strike plates. Strike plates for wood jambs shall be the high security type and shall be secured with a minimum of two wood screws 3" long which shall engage the door studs. 4. Jambs. Inswinging doors with wood jambs shall have rabitted jambs. The jambs on the strike side shall have solid shims above and below the strike plates and the opposite jamb shall have solid shims at the level of the strike plate. Both door studs shall be reinforced with horizontal solid blocking at the approximate height of strike. 5. Hinges. Exterior doors shall have non-removable hinge pins. 6. Sliding glass doors. Sliding glass doors shall comply with Chapter 54. Sliding glass doors shall be fitted with a locking device that shall engage the strike sufficiently to prevent its being disengaged by any possible movement of the door within the space or clearances provided for installation and operation. The bolt and strike shall be reinforced by hardened material so as to prevent their separation by pulling, prying or similar attack. An auxiliary locking device shall be installed on the door which may be a pin, lock, or similar device of not less than 1/4" diameter. The pin shall be of hardened Administration (415) 833-6650 • City Council (415) 833-6605 • Finance (41 8 • i • t i ti '` 20 ... Code Enforcement (415) 833-6620 • Engineering (415) 83 3 • PI i _ • I Police (415) 833-6670 • Public Works (415) 833-6630 R re : . .. PAGE sue,.OF--- n material and engage the metal portion of the sliding door. The primary locking device shall be operable by a keyed or code lock inside. Doors with 2 sliding panels shall be locked at the meeting rails and shall have an auxiliary locking device as described above. 8. Windows. All accessible windows which are not located at the front or main entrance side of a non-residential building shall be made secure as follows: a) Sliding glass windows shall be secured on the inside with a locking device capable of withstanding prying or wrenching. An auxiliary lock shall be installed on each sliding window that prevents movement in the sliding track. b) Louvered windows shall not be used within eight feet of ground level, adjacent structures, or fire escapes. c) Casement type windows shall be secured with a metal to metal locking device contacting both frames of the window at the meeting edge. Auxiliary locks such as a pin that penetrates both frame structures shall be installed on casement and double hung windows. d) Windows shall not be located within 40 inches of the locking device of any door not located on the main entrance side of the non-residential building unless the windows are glazed with 1/4" tempered glass. 9. Openable transoms. All exterior openable transoms exceeding 8 x 12 which are not located on the front or main entrance side of a non-residential building shall be protected with a steel grill and 1/4" minimum bars not more than 2" on center or by a screen with 1/8" diameter wire mesh not more than 2" on center mounted on the inside. 9. Roof openings. All skylights on the roof of a non-residential building shall be protected by: a) Iron bars 1/2 inch minimum diameter not more than 8" on center or; b) A screen with 1/8" diameter wire mesh not more than 2" on center. All roof access hatches of non-residential building shall be protected as follows: a) If the hatchway is of wooden material, it shall be covered on the inside with at least 16 gauge sheet steel or its equivalent attached with screws at 6" o.c.; b) The hatchway shall be secured from the inside with a slide bar or slide bolts; c) Outside hinges on all hatchway openings shall be provided with non-removable pins when using pin-type hinges. All air duct or air vent openings exceeding 8" x 12" on the roof or exterior walls of any building or premise used for business purposes shall be secured by covering the same with eitherof the following: • PAGEa OF a) Iron bars of at least 1/2" round or 1" x 1/4" flat steel material, spaced no more than 8" o.c. apart and securely fastened. 10. Exterior ladders. Exterior ladders to the roof are not permitted. 1/90 PAGE .OF_ n CITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza (415) 833-6630 Dublin CA 94568 In order to assist applicants in the development of commercial/industrial property, the City of Dublin Public Works Department has prepared the following list of Conditions of Approval that have typically been used. This list should not be considered all-inclusive. This list should be used as a guide only. Each application is analyzed separately and only Conditions that apply to a specific application will be recommended as Conditions of Approval for that application. Additional Conditions may be imposed as deemed necessary by the City. Prior to the actual preparation of development plans, it is highly recommended that Applicants meet with City Planning and Engineering Staff members to discuss Zoning and Engineering design requirements, submittal requirements and processing procedures. TYPICAL PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DEVELOPMENT ARCHAEOLOGY: 1. If, during construction, archaeological remains are encountered, construction in the vicinity shall be halted, an archaeologist consulted, and the City Planning Department notified. If, in the opinion of the archaeologist, the remains are significant, measures, as may be required by the Planning Director, shall be taken to protect them. CREEK: 2. Buildings shall be no closer than 20 feet from top of the bank along the Creek, where the top of bank is either the existing break in topography, or a point at the existing ground line which is the intersection of a line on a two- horizontal-to-one-vertical slope begun at the toe of the slope in the Creek (whichever is more restrictive.) DRAINAGE: 3. Roof drains shall empty onto paved areas, concrete swales, or other approved dissipating devices. Concentrated flows will not be allowed to flow over walkways. 4. A minimum of 12" diameter pipe shall be used for all public storm drains to ease maintenance and reduce potential blockage. 5. Under-sidewalk drains shall be provided to allow on-site drainage to be tied in, should the need arise. Rev: 5/17/89 1 . TTACHMENT511 PAGEa.2.OF DEBRIS: 6. Measures shall be taken to contain all trash, construction debris, and materials on-site until disposal off-site can be arranged. Developer shall be responsible for corrective measures at no expense to City of Dublin. DUST: 7. Areas undergoing grading, and all other construction activities, shall be watered, or other dust-pallative measures may be used, to prevent dust, as conditions warrant or as directed by the Public Works Official. 8. Dust control measures, as approved by the Public Works Director/City Engineer shall be followed at all times during grading and construction operations. EASEMENTS: 9. The developer shall acquire easements, and/or obtain rights-of-entry from the adjacent property owners for improvements required outside of the development site. Copies of the easements and/or rights-of-entry shall be in written form and be furnished to the Public Works Director/City Engineer. 10. Existing and proposed access and utility easements shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Director/City Engineer prior to acceptance of the development. These easements shall allow for practical vehicular and utility service access for all lots. EROSION: 11. Prior to any grading of the site, and in any case prior to issuance of a grading permit, a detailed construction grading/erosion control plan (including phasing); and a drainage, water quality, and erosion and sedimentation control plan for the post-construction period, both prepared by the Project Civil Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist, shall be approved by the Public Works Director/City Engineer. Said plans shall include detailed design, location, and maintenance criteria, of all erosion and sediment control measures. The post-construction plan shall attempt to insure that no increase in sediment or pollutants from the site will occur. The plan shall provide for long-term maintenance of all permanent erosion and sediment control measures such as slope vegetation. The construction grading/erosion control plan shall be implemented in place by October 15th and shall be maintained in place until April 15th unless otherwise allowed in writing by the Public Works Director/City Engineer. It shall be the developer's responsibility to maintain the erosion and sediment control measures for the year following acceptance of the development by the Public Works Director/City Engineer. FEES AND/OR DEPOSITS 12. Fees and/or deposits will be required per the City of Dublin Public Works Fee and Deposit schedules. - 2 - Rev: 5/17/89 PAGE�OF • FIRE: 13. Install fire hydrants at the locations approved by the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority in accordance with the standards in effect at the time of development. A raised blue reflectorized traffic marker shall be epoxied to the center of the paved street opposite each hydrant. 14. All materials and workmanship for fire hydrants, gated connections, and appurtenances thereto, necessary to provide water supply for fire protection, must be installed by the developer and conform to all requirements of the applicable provisions of the Standard Specifications of Dublin San Ramon Services District and Dougherty Regional Fire Authority. All such work will be subject to the joint field inspection of the Public Works Director/City Engineer and Dublin San Ramon Services District. 15. The development plans must be approved by the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority as evidenced by their signature on the Title sheet. FLOOD CONTROL: 16. Comply with Alameda County Flood Control District requirements. 17. In the 100-year Flood Hazard Zone, commercial buildings shall either provide flood-proofing, or have their finished floor elevation above the 100-year flood level. FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS: 18. Dedication of land shall be made to the City of Dublin such that it conveys land sufficient for the approved streets' right-of-way. Improvements shall be made, by the applicant, along all streets within the development and as required off-site, to include curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, drainage, and work on the existing paving, if necessary, from a structural or grade continuity standpoint. FUTURE CONFORMANCE: 19. The design and improvements of the development shall be in conformance with the design and improvements indicated graphically, or as modified by the Conditions of Approval. The improvements and design shall include street locations, grades, alignments, and widths, the design and storm drainage facilities inside and outside the development property, grading of lots, the boundaries of the development property, and shall show compliance with City standards for roadways. GRADING: 20. The minimum uniform street gradient shall be 1.0 percent. Parking lots shall have a minimum gradient of 1.0 percent, and a maximum gradient of 5.0 per cent. No cut or fill slopes shall exceed 2:1, unless approved by the project's Soils Engineer and reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director/City Engineer. Slopes shall be graded so that there is both horizontal and vertical slope variation, where visible from public areas, in order to create or maintain a natural appearance. - 3 - Rev: 5/17/89 PAGE2.2.OF- • 21. Prior to final preparation of the subgrade and placement of base materials, all underground utilities shall be installed and service connections stubbed out behind the sidewalk. Public utilities, Cable TV, sanitary sewers, and water lines, shall be installed in a manner which will not disturb the street pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk, when future service connections or extensions are made. 22. Grading shall be completed in compliance with the construction grading plans and recommendations of the Project Soils Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist, and the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan, and shall be done under the supervision of the Project Soils Engineer and/or Engineering Geologist, who shall, upon its completion, submit a declaration to the Public Works Director/City Engineer that all work was done in accordance with the recommendations contained in the soils and geologic investigation reports and the approved plans and specifications. 23. Any grading on adjacent properties will require written approval of those property owners affected. 24. The developer shall keep adjoining public streets free and clean of project dirt, mud, materials, and debris during the construction period, as is found necessary by the Public Works Official. 25. Where soil or geologic conditions encountered in grading operations are different from that anticipated in the soil and geologic investigation report, or where such conditions warrant changes to the recommendations contained in the original soil investigation, a revised soil or geologic report shall be submitted for approval by the Public Works Director/City Engineer. It shall be accompanied by an engineering and geological opinion as to the safety of the site from hazards of land slippage, erosion, settlement, and seismic activity. HANDICAPPED ACCESS: 26. Handicapped ramps and parking shall be provided as required by State of California Title 24. IMPROVEMENTS: 27. An as-built landscaping plan prepared by the project Landscape Architect and a declaration by the Project Landscape Architect that all work was done under his supervision and in accordance with the recommendations contained in the landscape and soil erosion and sedimentation control plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Director/City Engineer. 28. Grading of the subject property must conform with the approved grading plan and recommendations of the soils engineer to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director/City Engineer. 29. The following shall have been submitted to the Public Works Director/City Engineer : a. An as-built grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, including original ground surface elevations, as-graded ground surface elevations, lot drainage, and locations of all surface and subsurface drainage facilities. - 4 - Rev: 5/17/89 PAGE '�OF_._. b. A complete record, including location and elevation of all field density tests, and a summary of all field and laboratory tests. c. A declaration by the Project Civil Engineer and Project Geologist that all work was done in accordance with the recommendations contained in the soil and geologic investigation reports and the approved plans and specifications. 30. Prior to issuance of the encroachment permit, a cash bond or surety bond shall be provided and approved by the Public Works Director/City Engineer to guarantee the proper installation of public improvements. 31. Prior to release of the bond posted on encroachment permit: a. All improvements shall be installed as per the approved plans. b. All required landscaping shall be installed and established. SITE PLANS AND GRADING PLANS: 32. Obtain copies of and comply with conditions as noted on "City of Dublin General Notes on Improvement Plans" and "City of Dublin Improvement Plan Review Check List." 33. All improvements within the public right-of-way, including curb gutter, sidewalks, driveways, paving, and utilities, must be constructed in accordance with approved standards and/or plans and may be constructed only after an encroachment permit has been issued. 34. Complete site plans and grading plans shall be submitted to, and be approved by, the Public Works Director/City Engineer and other affected agencies having jurisdiction over public improvements, prior to issuance of the grading or encroachment permit. Plans shall show the existing and proposed improvements, both on-site and along adjacent public street(s), and property that relate to the proposed improvements. MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREA: 35. Maintenance of common areas, including ornamental landscaping, graded slopes, erosion control plantings and drainage, erosion and sediment control improvements, shall be the responsibility of the developer during construction stages and until final improvements are accepted by the City Council and the securities are released (one year after improvements are accepted). Thereafter, maintenance shall be the responsibility of a property owners' association or individual property owners, depending upon how maintenance is to be handled. MISCELLANEOUS: 36. Copies of the plans indicating all public improvements shall be submitted at 1"— 400-ft. scale, and 1"— 200-ft. scale for City mapping purposes. 37. The developer shall be responsible for controlling any rodent, mosquito, or other pest problem due to construction activities. - 5 - Rev: 5/17/89 PAGE _I__Of- NOISE: 38. Construction and grading operations shall be limited to weekdays (Monday through Friday) and the hours from 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., except as approved in writing by the Public Works Director/City Engineer. PERMITS: 39. Commercial/industrial property within the City of Dublin generally requires a grading and/or encroachment permit. A grading permit is required to review and inspect onsite improvements, typically involving but not limited to grading, drainage, and public access. An encroachment permit is required for all work done in the public right-of-way. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: 40. Any relocation of improvements or public facilities shall be accomplished at no expense to the City. STREETS: 41. The street surfacing shall be asphalt concrete paving. The Public Works Director/City Engineer shall review the project's Soils Engineer's structural pavement design. The subdivider shall, at his sole expense, make tests of the soil over which the surfacing and base is to be constructed and furnish the test reports to the Public Works Director/City Engineer. The Developer's soils engineer shall determine a preliminary structural design of the road bed. After rough grading has been completed, the developer shall have soil tests performed to determine the final design of the road bed. In lieu of these soil tests, the road may be designed and constructed based on an R-value of 5. 42. An encroachment permit shall be secured from the Public Works Director/City Engineer for any work done within the public right-of-way. STREET LIGHTS: 43. Install street light standards and luminaries of the design, spacing, and locations, approved by the Public Works Director/City Engineer and P.G.& E. STREET TREES: 44. Street trees, of at least a 15-gallon size, shall be planted along the street frontages. Trees shall be planted in accordance with a planting plan, including tree varieties and locations, approved by the Public Works Director/City Engineer. Trees planted within, or adjacent to, sidewalks shall be provided with root shields. WATER: 45. Water facilities must be connected to the DSRSD system, and must be installed at the expense of the developer, in accordance with District standards and specifications. All material and workmanship for water mains, and appurtenances thereto, must conform with all of the requirements of the officially adopted Water Code of the District and will be subject to field inspection by the District. - 6 - Rev: 5/17/89 PAGE 2 OF.... 46. Any water well, cathodic protection well, or exploratory boring shown on the map, that is known to exist, is proposed, or is located during the course of field operations, must be properly destroyed, backfilled, or maintained in accordance with applicable groundwater protection ordinances. Zone 7 should be contacted (at 443-9300) for additional information. ZONING: 47. Comply with all zoning provisions, including Zoning Ordinance and rezoning Conditions of Approval. - 7 - Rev: 5/17/89 PAGES 3 THE CITY OF DUBLIN P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 (415) 829-4600 STANDARD PLANT MATERIAL, IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT I (property owner) do hereby agree that all plants (trees, shrubs and ground cover) will be installed in accordance with the City of Dublin' s approved landscape plan for (name of project) located at • (address) . All plants will be replaced in kind as per the approved plan at such time as they are found to be missing, diseased, damaged, or dead, for at least one (1) year from the date of their installation. I further agree that all plants will henceforth be irrigated, fertilized, weeded and tended on a regular basis such that they will maintain a healthy and weedfree appearance. I further agree that the irrigation system will be installed according to the irrigation plans as approved by the City of Dublin, and that said system will be kept in good working order for at least one ( 1) year from the date of the landscaping installation. This agreement is binding against this and all property owners of record. Signed: Date: ATTACHMENT6 PAGES..OF Form 83-05 1/83 APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL r (_C) in I • 1 I i 11 nTh I 1 W _J w • F- J (r) cn Q F- U Q- 0 U ~ >- J Z z w 0 w a_ o _ a z PAGE OF STAFF STUL MAY 31, 1990 CJ c9 w 00 J (75 a__ J G*] U Z Z W 0 W d 0 • • ATTALIOIECT PAGE__OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION (To be prepared pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines, Section 1 . 7 (c) , 5 . 5 ) ° Description of Project: PA 90-15 BP Oil Conditional Use Permit/Site Development Review Application Project Location: 6400 Dublin Boulevard, Dublin, CA 94568 Name of Proponent: British Petroleum Oil I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Attached is a copy of the Initial Study ( "Environmental Information Form" and Environmental Checklist" ) documenting the reasons to support the above finding. The following mitigation measures are included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects on the environment. ( If no mitigation measures are included, indicate "not applicable" . If mitigation measures are included, a Monitoring/Reporting Plan must be attached) : Not Applicable . The attached Monitoring/Reporting Plan designed to ensure that these mitigation measures are carried out during the project ' s implementation is hereby incorporated and fully made part of this Negative Declaration: Not Applicable. T S ' gnature V- 6 Laurence L. Tong Printed Name Planning Director Title April 27 , 1990 Date ATTACHMENT PAGE OF v. Attachments Date Published: ° Date Posted: Date Notice Mailed: Considered by: on: Action on Negative Declaration: Approved Disapproved Notice of Determination filed: Council Resolution No. PAGE 3g"OF n CITY OF DUBLIN 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 4, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff PREPARED BY: Maureen O'Halloran, Senior Planner (Kip If SUBJECT: PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: Planned Development, Tentative Map and Annexation request to allow 300 multi-family condominiums/apartments on 16+ acres, 17 single family lots (custom home sites) on 10+ acres and 170+ acres of open space/parkland APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: George Thomas Paragon Group Pacific Mutual Building 523 W. Sixth Street, Suite 515 Los Angeles, CA 90014 PROPERTY OWNER: Mike Gleason P. 0. Box 107 Port Costa, CA 94569 LOCATION: Western terminus of Dublin Boulevard ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-18-3 & 941-18-4 PARCEL SIZE: 196+ acres GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Single Family Residential Medium-High Density Residential Open Space/Stream Corridor ITEM NO. 8,3 COPIES TO: Applicant Owner File PA 89-125 EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: A, Agricultural (unicorporated Alameda County) SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Agricultural/Grazing Land, Alameda County, Zoned A South: Caltrans right-of-way East: Valley Christian Center, Zoned A West: Agricultural/Grazing Land, Alameda County, Zoned A ZONING HISTORY: August 14, 1989: City Council approved a General Plan Amendment and certified an Environmental Impact Report for PA 87-012, Donlan Canyon, designating approximately 19.1+ acres Medium-high Density Residential, 13+ acres for Low Density Single Family Residential and 164.9 acres Open Space/Stream Corridor. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-31.0 Planned Development District Intent states, in part, that Planned Development Districts are established to encourage the arrangement of a compatible variety of uses on suitable land in such a manner that the resulting development will: a) Be in accord with the policies of the General Plan of the City of Dublin; b) Provide efficient use of the land that includes preservation of significant open areas and natural and topographic landscape features with minimum alteration of natural land forms; c) Provide an environment that will encourage the use of common open areas for neighborhood or community activities and other amenities; d) Be compatible with and enhance the development of the general area; and e) Create an attractive, efficient and safe environment. Section 8-1.2 of Chapter 1, Title 8 (Subdivision Ordinance Intent) states, in part, that it is the intent of this Chapter to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare; to assure in the division of land consistency with the policies of the General Plan and with the intent and provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; to coordinate lot design, street patterns, right-of-way, utilities and public facilities with community and neighborhood plans; to assure that areas dedicated for public purposes will be properly improved initially so as not to be a future burden upon the community; to preserve natural resources and prevent environmental damage; to maintain suitable standards to insure adequate, safe building sites; and, to prevent hazard to life and property. -2- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The City of Dublin proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance which finds that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the June 4, 1990, hearing was published in the local newspaper, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted a General Plan Amendment and a Final Environmental Impact Report as complete and adequate for the Donlan Canyon site on August 14, 1989. The General Plan Amendment 1) designated the entire site as part of the City's primary planning area, 2) designated 13+ acres as low density single- family residential (.5 to 3.8 DU/AC), 19.1 acres medium-high density residential (14.1 to 25 DU/AC) and 164.9 acres as open space/stream corridor. The Applicant's current application request, PA 89-125, is for 1) Tentative Map approval for 17 single-family lots on approximately 10 acres, one lot for multi-family condominiums/apartments on 16+ and 170+ acres of open space/park land, 2) Planned Development Prezoning approval for 17 single family custom lots, 300 condominiums/apartments and the balance of the site, 170+ acres as open space/parkland and 3) annexation of the site into the City of Dublin city limits. The Planning Commission's role in reviewing these three application requests is to conduct a Public Hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the requests and the environmental review. General Project Description The Applicant is proposing 17 single family custom home lots on approximately 10 acres, 300 condominium/apartments on 16+ acres and 170+ acres open space/parkland. The project is designed with the two cul-de-sacs in the single family portion of the project, obtaining access through the Hansen Hill Ranch site. The multi-family portion of the site gains access from the western end of Dublin Boulevard. The single family lots range in size from 15,000 square feet to 34,800 square feet. The proposed project includes a detention basin, emergency access roads, open space, and contribution of the projects percent share of: 1) the Valley Christian Center Road; 2) improvements to widen Dublin Boulevard between Silvergate Drive and Hansen Drive; 3) additional right turn lane west leg of eastbound Dublin Boulevard at San Ramon Road intersection; 4) construction of 5 foot wide sidewalk along the north side of Dublin Boulevard to Silvergate Drive (this is not a shared cost); and 5) the redesign of the Dublin Boulevard and Silvergate Drive intersection. -3- Environmental Review: Initial Study/Negative Declaration In compliance with State law (CEQA) requirements, an Initial Study for the project (PA 89-125) was completed referencing the prior EIR certified by the City Council on August 14, 1989. The Initial Study found that there would not be any significant effect on the environment. The initial Study for PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation incorporates by reference the earlier EIR prepared for PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment (SCH No. 88100406) and certified by the City Council, pursuant to Section 15153(c) and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines. The mitigation monitoring program approved by the City Council established mitigation which is incorporated into the project. Planned Development Prezoning: The proposed Planned Development allows for development of 17 single family custom homes, and 300 multi-family residential units, and zones 170+ acres for open space/parkland use. The proposed PD District establishes provisions and regulations for the single family portion of the project similar to the City's existing R-1 regulations. The provisions proposed for the multi-family portion are similar to previously approved multi-family Planned Development Districts in the City. Significant provisions of the multi-family development and the single family development include: Single Family 1. 10 foot front yard setback for garages with entrances facing the side property line rather than the 20 foot standard R-1 front yard setback. A similar provision was approved for the Hansen Hill project. 2. Building height restrictions for garages with 10 foot front yard setbacks. The PD District would require the height not to exceed one foot in height for each one foot the building is set back from the back of sidewalk. The PD does allow an exception for architectural features and elements and for gable roof elements. The maximum building height permitted in the R-1 District is 25 feet. A similar provision was approved for Hansen Hill. 3. Maximum building height of 35 foot. The PD establishes that the height measurement is taken at the perimeter of the building from the finished grade to the top of the structure. 25 feet is the maximum building height in the R-1 District and height is taken from an average of the high and low point of the lot. (However, in practice Staff utilizes the building perimeter method for measuring building height). Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 maximum height must generally conform to the building envelopes established for those lots in the visual analysis. 4. 15 foot minimum clear and level provision for rear yards and 5 foot minimum clear and level for sideyards. The existing R-1 District does not include a requirement for clear and level. However, the requirement for clear and level areas is a standard provision included in most single-family -4- residential Planned Development Districts in the City, either specifically in the PD regulations for the District or in the Site Development Review Conditions of Approval. A similar provision was required for Hansen Hill. 5. Requirement for decks when clear and level areas can not be provided due to either the topography or vegetation constraints on the site. A similar provision was included in the Hansen Hill Planned Development. 6. 10 foot rear yard setback for shade structures attached to the unit provided the shade structure is not enclosed. This PD District provision defines "enclosed" as having more than one vertical wall. The Zoning Ordinance currently does not permit structures attached to the main unit to encroach within the required 20 foot rear yard setback unless the property has compensating yards. A similar provision was required on Hansen Hill. 7. A tree preservation study establishing setbacks, drainage, irrigation and on-going maintenance is required on lots 11, 12 and 13 due to the significant oak woodlands located on these lots. 8. Minimum 2 covered parking spaces per unit is required. The R-1 regulations require 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit, however the Zoning Ordinance does not specify that the spaces must be covered. 9. A minimum lot depth of 100 feet, minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet and minimum lot width of 40 feet of street frontage and median lot width of 100 foot are proposed. Multi Family 1. 20 foot minimum front yard setback is required. This is typical front yard setback required in all residential areas in the City. 2. 10 foot minimum setback between building wall and parking area, drive aisle/roadways is required. This is similar to setback requirements for the villages. 3. 40 foot maximum building height with 2-5 foot exception permitted for architectural and gable elements. 4. 35 foot maximum building height is established for the recreational building with a 15 foot exception for architectural features. 5. The visual bulk and massing of buildings 1 and 2 shall be reduced through design modifications subject to Site Development Review approval. 6. Recycling collection containment areas are required subject to Site Development Review approval. The Planning Commission's task is to review the proposed Planned Development including the general provisions and make a recommendation as to the proposals consistency with the City's General Plan. -5- Staff has reviewed the PD Prezoning request for General Plan consistency and has found the proposal to be generally consistent with the General Plan land use designations and policies. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the PD Prezoning is consistent with the City's General Plan and recommend City Council approval. TENTATIVE MAP The Tentative Map provides specific detailed information concerning the physical layout of the project. Issues which are addressed at the Tentative Map stage of the planning process include the location, dimension and number of lots on the site, grading, easements, off-site and on-site improvements, street dedication, width, and location, open space, landscaping, park land dedication, water and utilities, CC&R's and miscellaneous construction activity limitations. In particular, the conditions of approval for the Tentative Map include requirements 1) for an all weather surface access to the existing ranch road located northwest of the multi-family project site, 2) for curb, gutter and 5 foot wide sidewalk on Dublin Boulevard from Silvergate Drive to the western end of Dublin Boulevard, and 3) which allow phased final map provided the Valley Christian Center road contribution occurs with the single family phase and any offers of open space dedication and all other off-site improvements occur with the first phase regardless of whether the first phase is the single family or multi family portion of the project. The required Parkland dedication for the Donlan Canyon project is 2.887 acres (based upon .011 acres per unit per single family portion of the site and .009 for the multi-family portion of the site). In-lieu fees may be paid instead of Parkland dedication or a combination of both may be provided based upon current market value of the developable acreage of the subdivided area. The developer is required to comply with the City's Parkland dedication requirements prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval which ever occurs first. The 170+ acres of open space if offered for dedication would not qualify for Parkland dedication in that it is not an active recreation area such as a playing field or basketball court, and is not designated in the General Plan or Master Plan of Parks as Parkland. As a condition of approval for the Planned Development Prezoning and Tentative Map, the open space area is required to be maintained and owned by the City (if offered and accepted), or an agency/Land Trust acceptable to the City. Currently, a one acre parcel of land situated south of the project site between the improved portion of Dublin Boulevard and the Applicant's property line, is owned by Alameda County as unimproved right-of-way. Once this area is annexed to the City of Dublin the City will own the one acre area. -6- The Applicant is proposing a land trade in order to utilize this one acre parcel within the multi-family portion of the project. The Applicant proposes to trade land adjacent to (west of) the terminus of Dublin Boulevard, which the City could then use or sell for the future extension of Dublin Boulevard to the west or any other use the City deems appropriate. Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Tentative Map subject to conditions of approval and recommend the City Council direct Staff to work with the Applicant to facilitate, for the City's best interest, the Applicant's acquisition of all or part of the one acre parcel (Parcel C). Annexation The project site is currently within the unincorporated portion of Alameda County. In order for the site to come under the jurisdiction of the City of Dublin, the site must be prezoned and annexation approved. The final approval for an annexation comes from the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). The Planning Commission's responsibility is to review the proposed annexation and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council in turn will review the recommendation and give Staff direction concerning the annexation and LAFCO application. Annexation is appropriate for this site as it is contiguous to the existing City limits and would allow the City to provide the necessary level of urban services to the site. The annexation proposal has been reviewed by the applicable public services and utilities who have indicated services can be provided to the area at a level commensurate to the level of service provided within the adjacent City limits. Staff recommends the Planning Commission support the annexation request and adopt the resolution recommending that City Council adopt a resolution of application to LAFCO. RECOMMENDATION: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Draft Resolution relating to Negative Declaration, PD Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation, or give Staff and Applicant direction and continue the matter. ACTION: Staff recommends the Commission adopt the following Resolution recommending City Council approval of the: 1. Draft Resolution regarding Negative Declaration (Exhibit B). 2. Draft Resolution regarding Planned Development Prezoning (Exhibit C). -7- 3. Draft Resolution regarding Tentative Map (Exhibit D). 4. Draft Resolution regarding Annexation (Exhibit E). ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Tentative Map, Site Plan, Floor Plans, Landscape Plans, Building Envelope Exhibit B: Resolution regarding Negative Declaration Exhibit C: Resolution regarding Planned Development Prezoning Exhibit D: Resolution regarding Tentative Map Exhibit E: Resolution regarding Annexation Background Attachments: Attachment 1: Aerial Map Attachment 2: Applicant's letter dated received January 17, 1990 Attachment 3: Applicant's Project Description Attachment 4: Initial Study Attachment 5: Negative Declaration -S- • LEGEND -I' �. "� (7,I ..r -\"4 . �r�_} "re,. yr�a+R�,c+.vG ❑ u[c.r aen CE04eG'C LYPUNAr,av ITE .� i!� r ,L '.[9 r 4Mi•� �5�L PLANNERS IA. mm twa.•ar,bL[/[[/ ` 3 ,J-;,,� l3uaL lk1 CIVIL ENGINEERS jI9 i r .�.�• I O 144vNY (Mll/IAT Of[L[lrn rtp. I I = � - SURVEYORS �••�'� L•r[(nar ys Iw MN DANVILLE BLVD CA7� n��u.�O.+[x1N[ �,.. 2 ,..._" parr tMD'It[C } OJECS}____Cr/14W �'''— _` ALAMO,CA 1450T ..l,-6YmulTo c um Iv wrc1.rorr I AREA I 1 (415)4J4.5544 / IP rt L0R tact Cam)6fleVrUM I I `I ''�-� i` FAX(415)q9-555T PLA 4 •c irNA.L • •u*• taw. }___ } fl-� • _CZ— PRLCT.V Or accoe TYPICAL POW JELT70U ,>�ATT:uv,..uu I I Air! _.—prub[r(INC VICINITY MAP (� Mrs w,, i / W • 2455 AU L o.vOaa cw.•u r.DTu fro n.m PARAGON c.Dln �!cawev a u L91 unID WITT CA Rem>o PACPIC MUTUAL WWII. ::: [ ;. TYPICAL a5aO XCTc "ANN"' NgWT ANOOATY u rJ ALA...CA.A,. SAN NATTIO.a YON •4NO1CAr1•11CNn.C,} CAMP•uur.sscaAT6610 N.MAIN MAuwnC•u CAT+1.. •TOILI..IC,N..e 1NCTO INC r • CONC...CA 4610 ..ATO SUPPLY: 661110 4 N YICTVCM,•CAS ICAO 1 r 14. 6/D1• 10.111 TAW, •MILK/AAA "" FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TOT.LSTIOT•LOT AL"�L 00MINIMUM LOT SIM AC TENTATIVE MAP. IA MULTIFAMILY CONCO UNITI DONLAN CANYON ,.alo[[o:C IA•1••a.AC4 „D a„A„ SUBDIVISION 5962 ITT (LOT 1 IS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) a ACP ou6D 61 a•O.O ACM CONTRA COSTA COUNTY.CALI/OSMA SisolOooLs OCTOBER,1N4 . 1.▪1•14 AC ALM NSTU,•11166-1.11[HOMES/ 4V ALIOUOT ASSOCIATES LOn n GA.NT 1499 DANVILLE BLVD. •c o•m•r•uwc ALAMO,CA 94599(415)959-5544 yK :1ti.c�: RECEIVED I. MAY 31 1990 ' 1 PLANNING fM41t ;or DUBLIN • 10.'N•r✓ I.I. 'aa'"''~ ... r' TENTATIVE MAP _ ♦..•.•I'.+,,," TRACT NO. 5926 ✓..•r•e•., r • was• •... x.w• \j a aa.a,a'.., ,ems, w•.•a6'I•N I•.ta ♦,w•/•I M on" ~ f••r•o~ ♦rrsr "♦••y•I•"• ow so' r wx (LOT 1 IS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) w♦.•••r .1• DONLAN CANYON r•!b•1 //1 w I/•M ♦r /] 1 DUL♦LN.CA ( w ✓,t•••,7-- PAR B. ♦ /V ewe. � DONLAN CANYON ASSOCIATES [� + ( • 10 SINGLE FAMILY v ( 410f v• ALIQUOT CM I \ • tip`sek �� ��,. ._ \ \ 1 ,,k-_:,-\:. EXPLANATION �f'`�� //_/� .. -y .. ; ( • .,VV i . -;•Gi .� .._. 11 0\ EROSION,SOIL CREEP Q• j•.�►,4'.-e r�s� !�' J EARTHFLOW OR DEBRIS FLOW: 111. !�11\ �� :r�- i `. WITH ARROW SHOWINGp.• $0 ��-•'• t• • DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT • ( VERY OLD LANDSLIDE ;\\ � PARCEL `• `4,0 ���~``........ +�'•`- 0 MULTI FAMILY - No -' .-,,,, =,, ..,...,... --e.1:,,,,,wit_....--.-.41r, -,, ,,---_,...„„;ow "..........L'----..0....,......:7---.. "1.1/... ....ir.J..' :-.11."'..-- ;"71'..:-/S: : / .4 10.51. . \ 'k\ IL* :''';'.'.\\.,‘.:,,,,,z, ._- ../i-1)'/6'1,-...i.;' 1 : a •K,; • -;roc'\' N �� -I \' {f �• • �i•Ir.ls• \),:.\\..',,.':*: . \.,,, \ , ' ,,>.- 111,:r. .1-11:: ., iiit:' .-- .- 45 — s 44. "hi: 'I I \\).-, •:..;;,.‘\., Ilk\11%4 -A 1...... 411°P...‘:; .'5. ..\\)... °e`i)11 iti‘it„,,,,,, ' � • A�� � \�� ` . , ._.....) t •y ) Imo , ,. •,• ..a •i " f / �p^ w _ ij GRADING BALANCE®340,000 CY /J]�f2 -?r. -E.C.E I V E !) Nit DANE1LLE SLED ALAYO.CA NMI I•+.1.A..ESN .AA 1.7Q SE.sut SHEET 2 OF 7 SHEETS MAY 31 1990 DUBLIN PLANNING pig/-ia5 • V / ---- .","- . .- ,, ig :'.... ..• I4 k '. :`,? --__ 7--- . ""1/401.1.0.0m1111.11 • • ,-; - t , 1111010110' ' •V '- - : - '00 .it.0414411.11.111t-.A I I lk- • T 1 • '. Iwiiri •./far,"'., F -- . : j4:0-";•1447,-s, wfe*A • Thiagraar.sarff 44, .,...% ,1-. ,,,i4W •4::". N ' :I" >/ 1.". - re-901... :01);:ilf , ' s , ig • ..L" - \staa..........m . #41•1111110,P# ,,. ow „-:, dilliiihitt, i._i4, 7k iiV, .'..1.: '.."'.:''.`,,,' - ti.s..•01;=/1 *42°41- !'''Sif-_- 411)* ' .4.•:`''"I..' ,ion. 17-1(4. 4,1*N fe. .iii;1.144,•-• l*ww „ Triel4 00004..._, , 4A, 14.1-r7 s40, 4,1,-1...?_,...p,z, fi• ‘ 1,7111117, , P ••• Vt.& . rla . . '117,4 „,ei:Vre, --- , ,, 4. je • . 104111.4".•/..f-,441,---W .10:4-ii-erAto - , ottr_ . • ;',,64- k,.._ :1/4_.....„-..,,..L,„--.., .:,,,,-... .,,. . ,-,..„ *44 „.10\ -.- -•.':----,--=-i77- N-:?.--..47:si;--Aiiii../v..;-?* / ;,..:411_,, ,,--.4:0 ,__ . ...t..- piy,47,0;./.4;zoo.,0,#•eif / \ 1 : 4r-0-4.-trA!ft,••,, •14441.( 1100 tp -e't..7 4 ,..(i ,411,-(4 -*/ vriv,01,0 1 i ,, tti Pit 40. if fid( l'P T*6- Ai 10i 04• '- ' • A 1 4 I s''4.111616 - 1:14kowt#-v I hit 0 4 4 I IIV '' I ID a I•41 .11M137,70170.;00-. --Plvailvelir- , ,iit •$041 -1 fFiliiilitt -,frAw,„,,__.,_*1.1tsivw A ilm" ilrilli. -.Pe;;'4.' - - - -3 -Cl- "j-airsowig -'109i ofilin6"01$444*.& Ao- -.0*-05!"_ 4•1•Vatzz-s- orm*PrAliar-le-10477:4410:141 171/ fI! i, p 1:/ir- . I , 1 if 4 i , s. TA-4,a4,:relg,1/4,7*-Wriri 1 > 1 II I 'i OfitiA191 .11r , I Frtel4./.-f I.-0x fignivolo N.= ....... irIten• do.- I I iron wiPeAlm • ilpW-- 1 li f r EL?,:i oli ritat 1 - , tilr " 1 riligMliwireems____Awsopir, o0,0-0..,••••-lowl a l' 11 4Ottle62=14:1W00 r1-%,.1.7- 1 oi ,i ii §4 ...:"...°12" ligrr°°%01 __, 11 11111 04 t 2M11111101:10•Fkj 1 . P ii P 1/14 k w---..-airgttfly t ‘°Iiii Ih'- ____ ••'- \ Vie& -mil' 11► 111‘ '41%,,N:4, -.. .4.11111.— 1.41111Pr __. _ ,so r f -_ • •• -•. \2- -,---- -- __,: _L' :-i ,_ ' ...-.,__,.,,------"•-..,„...,,. iiiii i•1 I.•.0 0 0.0 0._______._.__To 0.........•••••• PAII% --------.____ -- 40,11111.11W1.11116- � m�1111114e w` R,a �-.1, ►� _ �-v`•=w �� � ✓ � f'f/i ter. 'Y�- a~a�,, -� •10 ��7t � � •air \ , /�•�f= - ��T'I/�j ik �' - ���-.:.`rt. .. r.:..-�..ti''��'«T�1.ti.`4710.: ►pw �/���sia!� T` �.J1ia'"� „.,,,,...,...,..,_,_ 1,4 1 OroratIPtik :.:: :••,•- 77-"-.4/‘ ,41"10:4114 ' •• Ilk .- - t •r11r s ., . . )i , - -• fi• '1 I ,- � *, e'' • .1� 'ii - >ct t T te,,,v . 50.10.- 11„„Aw„ail,t....,, ._ ty?...7- tit, „,.. „1.47.- ,,,doiii..:1 iiih. 1.,,4:,... 4. ,•1-,....d.: • , 1 tr., , .. IL 110F1,1 rsp—Willii! L k'""\ 'II IN, % •. 4i 1 • Sil �' - i � � 4 *,�' `� �N �� jji' Ai ' tilikh irwinouil aw rig c. i.lergaiLa A �e1 I .:�/ii � ''� '��411 .` Adi. _ „....„...,........„, ..__. . ' 1. ... -fir. -� 1. wi�w i ` �I t . . `11,g,411M," Itik .1%.„\iiiiiiiftp, II�' it ,� 7ee.••... wy _ram r i � •.'t' TO BE DEDICATED FOR OPEN SPACE 1 -"z PARCEL A m�c ou. ALIQL,OT M MD:. . I PLANNERS •CALF:I.'�•lilt \ CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 0A7E:Lti/909 PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1199 DANVILLE BLVD DlfIDN: AND ALAMO,CA 94507 .4-.I.TENTATIVE MAP (115)1]e-55{I • C� • ■1 v 1/ DONLAN CANYON FAX(415)616-5557 SUBDIVISON 5962 F. •II.E7_Of_ _ENE. AY 311990 ri - /a-s DUBLIN PLANNING MI / •.. / / /// USW / TO BE OEDIC T gVEN SPACE ._- - _ / �� PARCEL A` - .—' .7. •'; i� ,c��%� _\ / / / - �/ Ica �• s/r. - i•'S r� /�►���11�j�- }._ /'/ / .i .ram T -alma ,®��� - -" �� Il , / / // , _____\._----,, . eallet ns _ions.' o_�_ _ ,�; or, 'Llli �,E ��.�� �i� _.�'� r„s_ D 1_ i ;c. —_ III 0f • 1 fo I k I /01 _I. ___ a 11 � • EP8F6 ,/\ I Y ` .I., . 1-- I 11 + e O �A_Z -\ Ifi , , .,-- ootl•Z-- . ..-•- - - -.2imegliala_..n —-'1.-w--1° Sal A ' Y\ 1 PAD 1 . �• , - � \\`\ _ -3 z,f ', ,"/D ` `t I� 4'S, 11�/ s PAD E` I 9 `•I or - — I �/.. f .----... 24. . 1 Ittil•-,1 t . -) - ' taLs . 04 , .2 0 , _;,„...• _ , , ,, , -,, ,. • . -. ' ,40.. iss ....--......_.:_—..-..-„,„., ..,...._,.;••_..: ..,,„ �� l ,% , +` r� =� fir.'f•tf � _� - e� • �Cam' , /\ \\�/ i : � -�( /\ � _?+3-\ __� , - �� \\ ado. N / • \LZ!� ,_,, ,,,,,.G"^°`- �\\ \ \ , ♦t �. � I � �"° pEDICAT ED FOR OPEN SPACE r. NTO i•I ` \ ' • _-- • // •� _ \ PARCEL A ilkii V� C `�, ,% ,00.* w, 7 9mwomY w. EFCLOStme' ,, 11 J Gig x.LE I` "� v 1. // % / TYPICAL CARPORT_SECTION I Ls.. „�.. •(r�,• i % SECTION A-A' my! I / •/ �� , / 0 —OW AM U. 7 Art-.,..., C JoE AO:8G074/ f; ' / ALIQUOT ECAEUI I / / / ( _�, I i / . j , PNNERSCIVILS( DETAL A SURVEYORS `M RW I �''., / PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN I�DY DANVILLE BLVO ( 1 I -- . -.� / /\/�I, r.n.,•„'• .,.rnr •,41J AND ALAMO,CA MS07 _— }•W I.• I\ / •_� TENTATIVE MAP (�/51 E7B-SSN 5 -- --� "'• • \ / lira a��•-n•.m.c wvnu,•v< DONLAN CANYON F ( 5 7 ,.• SURDIVISON 5962 ET 4_•/7 MAY 31 1990 191F-7- /a-5 DUBLIN PLANNING i tffn \\\ '`,„ --.-------____------__________ :_______ ____,,,, ------ --/-- '---- ii -7\t i'l -- 1 1 \ \N . i d,,\, i hi , ` , , \\ I\V\ ': /1 411W ... °\_ 11\1\4\ 1 ,,. \ . \\ \\V. .' \, ' \ � \ \\ _ i' ' \ '\, N -'- ----------s1-----------, _ \\\\,\ k \A \ \ \ N '---- - ------ 1 I \ ' ' v, \*\\\\ ' , .;',. --_:- - 4, i , , , \ \, \., \ „ ,„ _.__________ . , \\\ , \ \ \\ ,,.- "--. _. 7i \\ \ \ \ \ \ i\ \\\ \ \, . -- ?... Ili \\ \\ , \ \ \, \\\ ' \ \ ' \ \ ' \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ as \ a o 1;1 \ \\ ,_'_t i . :\ ,17.'* \s s ", \ _ N \ \ t *f. \ - * 6 in i l*L N N N 'N.,N litir ' N -›\;1 " ‘ N N iitl - iii -414 „\ xi ,N / - . \ It ' N2 Li II _ \ ;�7��,15 1 l3 ` \ \ :7*./it K /''1 f 1 ""',— ___,...---------,, /II"- .....: .44w._--sifiti • °c s �j Dco � r „,\,10,--- • .,• \ 0 • i A y 7 ,,, • t .\ 7 i / 1 /� .tee. �'/ ���� �� ? v\ �,���v, �\\ y (1 � F� \v Ilig II / 1- -“:, Nc‘ .11:i- %,\\.-.\\ I ! , ‘..,,-, ' \s 'o, 1 1 /fir nn 'At` O I I /�l m �' A i I( : i I O `\ - \. i- \4 § 1 ° tit 1\�'' eye' O 1+II m ___..., .... ..,;.,......z ...--. ',.1 v,, \,,‘,\\ ' t":, \ 1K .''' o • • •, :. \\ 0 A ' : ‘14‘, '.'s \\ ,e' 4 \, 't\-A. lif°111111114sei(e, '% ,\ • \ \ . ‘\.,\ -t ` lk ... \' %. \ , , f A .. , , \\ „. . -:,. \ , • ,,,.., . ,\ ,,, s, . , ‘.,\ _...A.. . ,,,, .-N, .., ‘ x , ..„\\k,,,, , . , Ix .7\_12. s‘ • , itito., ‘,,,,\ \ . , \ \ •..• •,.,. , ,\ .. . ... ,,,.... \.,,, 14 \ ' \ \ A,':,r. — .\'‘‘\, *44S 'IV:,.•••-‘ i ....„ .•....-...,,,,:,',. A.. 4 .•., ,- . ' ': \- ...- ..'8\ , ..,-,k--;:-:\ - -, _ \ , e. 'i., "....::..,_,.....:N_N, .,\:, ,,t\-,,:\\.—\ ,... **.%_,.4,- ,1: .:_- ---_,_—_.7.N---:,-----,,,...1,:i...:„..„. -... ..144\., ss.., <.‘ _,.....,„ • ..,....-- ,:y4:7-5 -- -, :,.. -....,..\; s \ \ ,..,x,„,.. _....‘ fl 1r-. _,z•••z- 1 • ' ..\*\ •,/ ..:1.- ---.--';:- \ e - ,!- \ . i ,..,., _, . , ..4,1,._. . ,m.....v---.,:_ „ ,.. t ( 1 Zo �• '-� a. r:• a-,i u£ F O‘, _... ,.. :iv ?•' S•% - - v. -�• • rO y ia' •J 1 a 41 _m z F s „ I m j ', \ r6 / I 7 . A il01 ', , -z\,, - Ary war/:40' MI , c �+ m- l H PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Niger' syH {��'" (1AND 1 _ ~ J 1 Q v or+rr, 6D TENTATIVE MAP / imC I'''ny °A""�"'�D DONLAN CANYON \ aa " \t ' e.a�RWSUBDIVISON 5962 Ar DM S- nrvi�ro cAAu.w �'�'�^c AT WATrn TANk PATION ; 111110 •� NO.ST DATE RliCtNVED WV17 :;43 *lir 31 ;,, ..., 0. ..1/4 ,,on.:4„.....z,4, 0,,t,...,,,, \iiiier s_i?, rn.. e/#01,0',71'14/1rifi "*.ttfoi,474, ,,,, . ,1,, 4,1.,..iyily it,,,,.. ,44,4ki*PAi, iut.,... 2 I * VONVV /r ; 'fib by. ('`* ��' ,1`�i+ l�r>s `duo �, jti ',,» .,4,44..., A r-- i t . : )1/46.) . ' 0 rekaillp • ' .\ .0 ". irprIalirii .‘!,..,,VP '' 6'0Atig!Oi t 41 411c,t#4400 .':' • ,1 � • � � . 1'�pl+� � - .,, �• r I l,. DLL i,. 11� O Aj.-ilk i4tii • ♦ , / 1� I .� r,1 . A „...� •` y� r .,rv- '�, ant .. ,�0 ,I r,�.1•1 �1 '.I J „.rL.� �.�G°R!5�- c`J 111 J .p , f a .. 'a , a aw.f� 1,;^v ��r �� �rl� ��� /ir -may` ! �rp����� �I��`��Z►�i'f` .:�� �d� l Qtd� :,� Ay� �f �Jj /� ,a *O +P 1 . A,- 11 A4 ith io .ib ;"I r eiC/ g Q i) IPA it �V ��//9 (►0 ®) • *41 e r,r. -, \♦ , .-_' - r .� ,$) ,fit► /. tat -At ,p .. j'l'ar:1 ►w• r: �fn -r 1 ® ¢,°J �� .41it ' 'A j1+ !" Et', 'V'' ,� *I � 0=�' �.l�r al' wpm li 4hn ;" ' �i •.f Ani (/ ` 'Aft / . it • I1l441' A3j . gl-.'!e^IZ"daa-1-) t,s 4.' !, • ..I;A, Q' (-,•� 1 ,'r.'/• ��/i �'— ^' •'� .x�r,i�r 146J��r1` �rl�~�\�` ?1��`•'• .,.� �`!'s Ill o. Q/�•• .�� 7iR 'x �. 4.riik _• a ,1 ►'.,4, : $ ' �\�J�• `'1 • 44• �s�up A04 i sib � ,1sfir`41plm ��is � 3'!�f� rw.nj��"91jv• � I_I Aa�' �i �1=�� ,.11.� � •1i ........ 44, � �.A ��? t r r! r L .;- .'.� 7�41'd• '�• �_ tl i,. it 1��` _�r{ri'. i 'r ® CO.1i,tl. iF fl.1111111, p►ti &4'1,u�:TOO "11� �P'e,74V41"t F,1•3`�'w,,�1,, �4��,o/iltrAt 11 • ►14:�—t �iI5a y VV. O'er �1,► ♦ -er ii ► L - A. .,` \'r�'II;A0 �� 1�•�I '•'v7'� art � s_ •. ii- ► i • \ _d_ IL d o ff . s - / . Tv �,E PLAN V •� \ i9 (HANDAL) • \ ne"^".),, \ J II 1..ITH r.,M.r, MASTER SITE PLAN \ MP©çf\cAMp Ati111A1Ei,lli. _ 171 uso NORTH rw+sl.Son 102 NNW Mk CA9s9Nlunsnn . - - . RECEIVED L.,,,,,N. NOV 171989 aR - :- ` � ',''. :LIN PLANNING 31 �. z. s i • 'A.A $� 0 K �� Cc) Alvah-d _,c rid 9 ie� a► ' *AV& 4 I / {" 1.sr, 41 ii ' IV t- • • wP _. e 14 d� • Ei ... Z/� 4 _A� Ill* , it� 9 P• . 1a''Iitle.�s. A,� irk A t�ll E i� Z i w � , 1, l 1 rf u r ,,;` aim c 1��� T!� � i •���Vi f/i,'o S�R\,yl� ' �5;, �� IDS 1' I�rl �Pr Fag,,,,,,, I�L'� `I i �yl' /A,:\i`L ® 1t.;/� �' uJE ��'��Pital � � 7�'ice"------ =-1.,..-=../....:Ai� � �'�j� a eA ■r 1 . ,_... •���` r�r ,�1�, - �./i►L ® `L1��t111 II I,Wrl,.! $ 's' i�I- ;.all:i1=V'3�,'!� I 41.9 ,, el{y ,,/t _. ,�,. ;RI'. Ali..,,../Y.,,J'•.• c - 'i ������, slN.irpa•' �•�f- ���hl� Ilk Q '�\ �IU �Z�� �! . _ _ • - °hyy,,� Pielloollb:,---'' ._,„Z 1•10...":;frifit ___, %ipt,10",11. ,-- ‘,4,‘ '\o,--- ..,, -.)..1,7;—-,--- ,,,,,,,...—Pr • .�a\.E. `a Q 1 ._ z a •O . I;. '�' t�ir 4 r NATIVE PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN HABITAT AREA ORNAMENTAL PLANT MATERIAL y ^. .�I�Q•�Y i �� s� __SREES TREES IC a • ‘4 ''JL ""' _- -QIIEIICLIS AGRFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK _ ACER RUERUM RED MAPLE MP 0 0 I � c10I '. QUERCUS LORATA VALLEY OAK ACER PALMATUM tAPANSE MAPLE 0 U. •° / .00 QUERCUS WISLIZEM NTERKJR LIVE OAK ARBUTUS UNDO STRAWBERRY TREE 0 k 1 „` SALIX LAEVIGATA RED WELOW EUCALYPTUS NC/1OLLF WILLOW-LEAFED PEPPERMINT �0�\ .F SAUX LASKOLEPIS ARROYO WILLOW FRAXNUS O.RAYWOOD' RAYWOOD ASH ,',• �Y 1�'1{�f' UMBELLUARIA CALFOI NCA CALIFORNIA BAY GLEDITSIA T..SHADKMASTER' SHADEMASTER HONEY LOCUST \ `1���; l/\q� , e-111111\t' a LIQUDAMBAR S.PAIO ALTO' SWEEIOUM 1 1' • , �f' SHRUBS PNUS HALEPENSIS ALEPPO PINE gli ( 1 I __ -/(0� ,er- 4.+T � PS CK STONE PINE >a ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSFLORA SONOMA MANZANTA PRUNUSRI CfRA.SFERA 1(.V: PURPLE-LEAF PLUM�� 1T1. '�. Y\\V ��� % / ATRVLCXLKNTFpMOS BREWER! BREWER'S SAUBRUSH PYRUS C.'ARISTOCRAT' ARISTOCRAT PEAR Gy. a• ,,: � / • ARENARIA CALFORNCA SANDWORT PYRES KUWAKAMR EVERGREEN PEAR _�lA.. / •� BACCHARIS PIEULARIS'CONSAGUNEA' COYOTE BRUSH e �+�,L CEANOTMUS'CONCHA' CONCHA CEANOTMIS SHRUBS _ N a CEANW/RS CLFEATUS BIICKRRUSN / CEANUS SPECKSE TMYSFlO1IIS BLUE BRUSH AZALEATMIS LEXMO PERT$ LlRNU5 LUPINE AZALEA MORAEA NTIOSPORUM MIMLXUS GUTTATUS MONKEY FLOWER COLEONEMA MYOPORUM RAPNOLEPSIS RIIAAINUS CALFORNCA CALIFORNIA CO•TEEBERRY ERICA NANXJA TRACNlOSP[RMUM � •T REFS UCL S CAER LE GOOSEBERRY FECALLONA NRA9M %YIOSMA SAMBUCIS CAERULEA ELDERBERRY FERNS PMOfIN1A / VITS CALIORBCA WED GRAPE �M /k / RI/RU5 VITFOLIUS CALFORNA BLACKBERRY 1/y (P A PAL) .. (PARTIAL) NI9 NORTH ( 10 0 10 BO .„10/13/09 %AI MASTER SITE PLAN /``Ii/'A� CAMP8tIC1 L1TCAEt,ItIvIPC. ""' ► �/ Irelsf+EeA Woo. IDEONREIMVNST.SHIL XLWWUIDILBLG915%RIA9OSEA1 �_� RECEIVED LARGE RECREATION AREA //i% !...i. ��,��� IIIII\' ' 't. ro—Tor - ,��' s . r SCALE:1=1(1' �5 :.,. \\� • , v �v rr R >j �1C ir/ 'G.�U0LI` •' .•iIl•t i) fi- 0 A$ i,N� i i �.,m �_ .is i� `, ��lj;!• c P1 as� 7 + r41j " I��\�\ `xio _�j�/\,`, �\ �+ •'l• 1 �Jam~ ,!r�I` t�'`,J g• od �, • y tl Ill. �/i 4�r �U'�`ii�,ti �� e� gliti : e \. �4 d♦1 � � i�t'1 �`�� ,i� r�`'� i% . �Gh1y1 �Fj=i� s e +n ,. .�� ��� +7�,� �'�i �" e�ice " } 3l .1-'..,k., -,..'t ' 4' --46, .‹. ,,, If Itt .' . 9 +.��•ilik' '�`�'� 11�1• �, M:,.k ice'; •i�:i, ,C ,Cti•-T / �la-IN.�f�. i��` 2 4g ENTRANCE MO' MENT .��I x �'�O' _ �'(CIj• y�'•. `�`"`r, � 1'�I' `fir m D KI: ..,4 4(P°°i `P;t A L f i l L♦1* ;'k. w e f ® .! kph,'n�,+n' ‘440 t. •' /. i FOl1 snq/\ ` td1 s d1 : _ LA R•• 4 ; '• .I q g L,I ti, \,, ,'sp•V•4..42 ae• ' ,44 • ice` 1 1r* o o.. < X. �i \` - /�.• .'•' . Fyn Z u . • ....) '', # 7 �:. < 'AI**. ‘.16:eti* -.1 . .'c-4:44'.. ...,,. , • , iter.7 p CO' n,/7.-4vW:At.J! 4 „ , -...-A. „.1111111: - .V9 44 ii*.' f4wirde ./ - • 144 • b • ���. 40.4r. ,' ` '^' fi •: r.•r ` 44 . :tp::`, �fia:_s • �\ ' y" 'll .7'' -:.-.. , '--- "*."4ii itt," ' 41), r, • � e tt� • �ia :. -,/ .:.. 'c''''4.41; e'li ' ' A1,-..... ‘. ` 41iiti, ._ Aik. ci ' ... dib:a. • .. PROJECT ?n m ... �c� \04• �� ♦ • ?.. a SOUNDWA ►, •,�• m r� 7 ,F•� r ,�� "ti!'"0 `,�.'"1� t � d jam.. �\ _ �` - ,G�� �Y���s..J�1� i�+�7. i- p!.� ' /I I�$. .41, -4. e.4, 'Y' !;f • ..fit c„,,y! IT ,'i --�• ♦ _•"e� i� �00"41iir J,'�� e I d % ;srrEaAETv vAVEikEnli •f" sue" '•� , X' Y i,� '�.`..l t. /♦ fy} I, i��f '� ,• s r' '`;, '1: s l-� •s Oil ,-. • 4.11.1111!. :::,,.. ...• ':..:'.:" ,., 7411, N,. . - :-.4,.:''',...°0,43;.' ,.. . 0;1%4' •r•e wy j ' rdii / _ r01 , ` " � �r o...IV/• • . v .. /_ `�Q L• \ ::=2 , I dh' fir 01y'r RECEIVED NOV 171989 j� '•..: DUBLIN PLANNING • - ..... ,-.-_-_ _ •• . •... 4 • . . .. • .-• ._ 1, --- . y���� p '; • - . .. .. .. •..... ,...' • ...-- .• . .. ,.. • 7 ..AA 1 . • :�_� - �� .. . .... . . • .--.. ' .-. ,... ily . "....../.......-.. ... ........; \ i .//k-..----- -, . ',- -.,- . ... • ..--: ..-. Pi _, ....::!.:'•-'-':N\\l'''._:,.--A.. .,.•• • ....4 4775° '---- - iikk,--...--.-"."----,"-- ....;:/ 11111‘ NN1 / /':::' '. . .' ..'.:.:'..:':'-.•• • .• '.. .: -;? \' '..---. • • •; "e"7,'• ' kz ' .. ' ilAk‘ v.• .. .:•-:_____.\fl,.....:_-_- . . • . .• • .• ... c93 ; /— • • ' • z i '..-.. . .:. Q-'"r-)'' — . r'A r-11*-. r . : . i 1 'h'l - *��I °� '4Sp1ry-;� m> y O _��. 1A. ., n'Y CREE p• ' .I� ti� 1}, rti, � i il,01 \,c1,0Q ,�Q.N �-o^t(` 5(' +Ir .�01� I' Ysrry ,' y i, \Q,,�. A , 1' �y . ,,.. p/ y : �r` � 11 1. ,I.Lin .t. „,:. ,\,a�\ \N",' \\, \fi\,t� c.)o U 1110)Nielliiisi IFIN, IV.. . qi'' ‘,\,k,tsi‘.;",,,''‘':, -, ss,' ":'.6 I itlik„ —*frik ericzer--- / :.... ..-,'V.': ' '0,Nli \k\V's\s,::,W!•' \‘,,,Yi‘\'‘N‘V,‘""\s • '\ ,,\\,' \s,,,,,N,,,, .,,\,::\"\, ‘,‘\,:',\,11\',:\,\‘‘.0,,I.s:A:\'',..,,,'•:_,''' $jbIlist,-,-,,,,.*4; r,/,, /04,4,14.„ ‘.Am —•=2-12-:j,.. I<' , ',;, .\i ,;\� .\ , , '1 � P s ° , o2 � 0.-, , ' �\ / , �4„...21 .� . ,; � vii„, • ,.. .„;„,..,.t..•„.,•'4 '1' i :4',..44 i:4"1..,- •1'..:''''' .. C.): R 11110.. ilL 1r ',,,,,44,', . lilt lt,f41 '''' 4.4]4.t.:::'/.:1 slia:SIA.,•:r it , \ A (4;,:„.:44 ,1,,,, --,... 444Lter,t- • x i !: .v r o i,., it 11. LYI VA ,i11-' iii&.• 0) /(,/y/ 1/6//,77Y-- ----M-Afir a i'aft iir* i skis- _ /s /75, ‘ ,,v( 11:4„ SMALL RECREATION AREA SCALE:1"..10' .'' ...L-4 RECEIVED NOV 171989 RMS.. .. • DUBLIN PLANNING F •• ,,((���.� :��e��r' �• 1 _ f Lcc \♦ i , .1,c i, • • ,Np • a;- ° a"6.V,I,13i • • • ,• t _ • a"A< S. :3,4a ♦4.4 c — 0014 1 � , 1 i•, rr 4b /�lv n" d��. ,�,�,, '�.sip i ''� N ..:-,...:::::11, .A -',''' 171-;--_--!-----:7._. ,' ''--41mUllibilliir i - , 1.16,,,,., , • _ if, , z . 0,, EL4 --, . . if :.� Sil,'1�� �'�r �w� }I)I�'}f �p {� ,�� �fl¢I� Vr� r�til' ¢ (4 r.�rl� �'e ,� r �S� t.'\'i! Yl' ,3aa�} ,„...v: fil•IP. ..-.1.4.--"-.7.-•-171 ---4-1-.—. , 17 silltiOrty g -"---'--. '-'' '-'-' :1 \ AI to cF e•'...' i � 11�111 + '�I r ,r y! � ,� ; Q } r 'r� r', .�Ins{v' ���;�' �'I„d1�14n' . 'k,11' ,11;4, f 1;; 1;, '',:��,} J ' I dr 1�,, ...Ni '�' tl}''+1 ' 1 "1 11111440.3, o .S-' i �1�V,, , , 1 1� I r,,l ,,l{,o',I';i:p;'i ',V l '1Vk., l;,,l,;�1 Il 1�,.fh,'I,,,, ,1, ,fi9�1 -. ,��,��, , o I I; I ,I I BSI '! :'.. tL 1 fys I l r,l,,llr l d11, li {l{;y4 I:; il, I _ - Q� a Ir, l,' Irti 1'I} '; ; $' 'f 1 li'�I' ,, ,, # l l s I o "• i ' ' 6' {;' r ,I L ',I , I 1 I+;li�,lvr1 ;,,y; ,+r} }__ ;. ,I ; ;, 1 r,; r'��y;,l (;+l+l } l�r, ,;# � , ;111 ;4�I';l [;'I r;;4r, ;Ir,, - _ � ,: _< ' �; ( ''2 '• i' •r k ]j••' , 11 •';{{• :I;' .•'011 11 {l ;I•r'I t'}I ' ;'I;;:. `- - 'M#41 :4Q i °',,Nit.;r i ill-Vt 'i • ;,,r 11. S'41::F ,1,,§� ,,M1I',' .0?,. �i, I};"t, :1 .' $ Iv I sl l = ' m 'L `` hr r �1 t� Z 2 yl1'It,11if �rCf,}ty1,1, 1 {1,y� a _ ',lir,l, l ,l ;I' I ,I,,1;,1 r,, I ,l II+ oLL o ,�' *% 1 1 f 'fp,,'1;..,), ,o f„ } r, ; �; ly}l 'r C.;y ,l;,l l\lJ o y 14 I{''''ly ��,4''• �ti y+,'yr, t r �, �1 r��, . ' , �, I,+I, ; ; ; �¢,,,I,,,,;� „ � r O4 ' ��/ Ir I„� ,I I r lil, il 14 J 11„ �,�'{ rl r ■�i I", ,til f+P ld+ ':' :(,,,\i''; 'I r)r 1 ` } A;}.„ i. Q}{ ,1{':,1,\r I •.I I, f� ' 1i/ .:. .`t Ill ii ,�,��Iiff.' � -. r le,'Pe r11y�jy� '1,e,,, -..-;,..-' • • ' rlift'.7- • 44° it' '6 Iv :14,1;104' ;-• : , r Ax:'4.F,0,1".1.4 • - ,_,, .i.,,714,164,-: -,-- ---.-...,,,.. .r:a_ 10 '•* '':41111 "-•likky 117 _ -4'-‘4,--. ___________________ 4ii . . ' 6 i .:',.:;?;:•'''A4111,111j," -". 41 llitAili ... b ...- ..... . low, ,,7„,,m.„:4,,,,,, ilit,,._, . ,z, e% '-‘ ;� �`il' �! • ...10/13/89 TYPICAL BUILDING ENLARGEMENT I a�. • bs SCALC 1"=10' 1 o,.. �— L-5... ( \\ S i .i I MI ►� \„H`HE aisa:r ___ :i I - _� -i/y 0.1 XI I ilid 5 ‘ ;Vir% 2 9 1 �� ,11 ,1 \ 9I9 LSlS'L•-4 1l32L."vfF4 - - 0 .�� 0i.t 'TA04*V-�\- * ' air Y f \ .W' 111. ��'< i ,.//(s I g 1 It. _ : A.1. . 6 : �:fY .A 1 S `Jal ' f MI PEE I Y i d-JIpIIfillll!r!- : A . ` / } _ W : a 1T %`l II11II _ i rim -I I I" i I is: n , \) \\ �. ........_.q J = ate R _ ` � .moo = B1..2.g IE — L M� .k 1 IIIII [1IIlIlIHIl o ._._ - I 7 il v -'11I 1 I f 04 4 tiA4, ��:�1 � 1 it lii um�i I y r .'027.1-. ,V \ '41k, kli.,PiP telitit tea. 4* .141r404., , „,, Ipi.i'i-etr: � fr Q. �� ij 16 i 1•411 tell 1 14'. <A. i N 1 .* � n \-4186 fOlit-Cil' - /( •/-( i.C' / /413r.." Aitilps .NT AI I I I 1.•••..s 4 Str4/le 414,4 Ak„,,'4111.V" # ilk . „ #44,:e qr 04/Flroti„•‘.. // s• * :$1 A16..4. / cppn ppo- �wppg of _ i u vo I :'+ �, '. .. gz Im�g' g: �� 5 0 6/ / .`, � I I ;; , .CSC C i , 1 e - S 1 k f&-a, SUBO group I l e a yyy i 1 i A . •II:I i i . F y / C SNI 1034 G M104(AS 1-a00{ L . URE URBAN PLA KMINO - 1 26 toss., C4fht Yam, A_ A_ H • • 74 _s / Q/1°' . t,4.,,, ..,„0„, v.._ . '- \\ . \ %::Nto ".'0% ver.-14' 7016' / S ik ws s � , "�� o fho,L 1 t\ . --INN* ' \.e.. . 5 11 1..■r . lu / ii 0.;1 ., N eu1 /,v Q 4igi TANAKATSUBO group I s i i I A DONLAN CANYON t00 FASI°a,RUM BLVD.SURF M 1 1 A i z FOR PARAGON GROUP sµ CA w MU RH 015)5n sow 14 t 1 PARAGON .. - '. DUBLIN CALIFORNIA - ARCHITECTURE a URBANSPLANNINC • 21°-0- , 1 O ♦ E i C oai 25'-9' Z I 9 ,- a C D 0 — ; ai : 0` A 1 ■ —l�c91 0 E �° �J � i ` �pi ___.___O 0.0 a �� �O� NSF I, e 1 (1 a 1J- ii �: a O a _� L i go A F E, !ck o ; 1r NI 0 ; N r 0. m vr. o o o Im 1! CCD �r 1.1 •1.14 x b6 c Iv I CI i. I I 14 i I f is'-4 t/2• § , e'-to 1/2- 1 i fi IV 4 it. i P6 3�a r�: I r. A , Pb i : t =O O o to g r o o o Z 7-_ g p 23'-8• ? I -}t ImN • '. CaddI I- co +. - 19 g `, g 7 i. to r4. of . F 1 O v o v d f N rF4 --1-*ia0 —, m o q. 0 ^ o z X. k '' \\ 33'-3 t/2- < f 1 I = 0ITI + 0 o I^.t $ f ha--I Pb Q $� IN T — } COA 0 y= g §: 3?l 1° 9 (0 DONLAN CANYON TANAKATSUBO group , : , ; : 9 FOR PARAGON GROUP 1400 FASHION WICmow'SV11E 210 Ca 2 N W1 NA120,G 94104(415)511-6094 • 4, • IARAYGN - - DUBLIN,CALIFORNIA ARGNITEGTURE • URBAN PLANNING 1 w + g tog 9 O 1 C • F r �� C I I a 110/ 5 OI ao . rdi.L.I.fuli o 1 DI - ; . i" 13€ N g= 1 I ; -- A � a 1E m om m z 8' ] '- - o p t,: Z ' m a IV IIIf r s a 66 i < o T b z • z z z 0 Lt o 'z_ z 111 o O ; / i Y-1' L 25'-0' -II- c- r_, 25'-0' O 1 --- o G , Illrl'' m c = o� o �/ c a OC gi , °o >I i {r O lc 03 1 1 a _0,5 L—-dp u:t.. t 4. N €E t I + Fli ���O s 0 mF I _ m < 0 c 1— " om •! coa ; ,� 6b T $ z 6 IA bp r A v A 3 I 1 1 v l m i E _ --- r. 0 rT HOC ` e o ' �d 7-4' 25'-0' Am N .J —e —IL--' V ,v ITI0 OZ ' 28-C, z CO v 3 i g 6 g = 3 11 DONLAN CANYON ! TANAKATSUBO group i , }' I600 fASRGLA BLVD.SUM 260 FOR PARAGON GROUP SWMATEO,CA Ya64(415)57-l096 DUBLIN,CALIFORNIA ARCHITECTURE a URBAN PLANNING • /'1 O I�(/ III cU� ) ' (i 1h�1 11!( C z F I �I I, 1I s .n ill, \{ I I —, , . ILI:1(. \ I I o •i m IttVr,llttnl,,_', m I I �, z I I, ir I m 1 r / r d:: / f m j1p,,�,-.:.IIIIIII :::1 < IYNONII UWIHII z ,I11 1 (Illy 1 II �',III' I I I 1 q nIn 11 • oT1 IIi 1 111c1a ,I„'1' III!! I�i 7A1 j a � 'T 1:llillS O lumu'rr _ ... c m 03 6 G I o r mum� u� O YI I W Y� 1 �. W D Y/ 11�.���'i "a • U -4 :wwullt m ..N ••• �� s v-a H1 E111111111111111 , — =RISI_S)■� m I 1' ,1, i :- -1Mil __ , .NL L1. ry 1 I, -I -I ( II 1 M I' I '11 11'1 I z • _ b-_ s '�I 1 ',Pi I , _ -1 v lRni r I D N N I it ry illy. 'II O ri IImQIIIOII��i;' I !mmmmi 9 ir• Y h/I ' imin;rfENi!Nll! /111 1111111� to I I R Iul 11 1 1 I m m P I1 III M i I 1■1 H 11dI ] I II :-A la •_� Illllln� IIIIII' .w. WI II.f = t II x ._ —7. —_ o 7Fir.visiltalsolmi , II Il'I1 e l III'i�IiI I''' $F4 °• III\ 1111 ! W . pill s. w < iiiI ��Il 111. v U C p:c ^�—fH� , •III Ill I W Pl / eY �- o m j II;:Y� :... • Z C :tee �+�a ,m,o_ I.,,I Cy s gilll(IllllUIIII, ram- N rn r D c3 - � :,. Z _. < C FIRST FLOOR . SECOND FLOOR C.;,:.`:;• „,--.; : :. Z to rn to z v , ; 6 E ; . 6 a gl DONLAN CANYONTANAKATSUBQ group I »e FOR PARAGON GROUP MO FASHION Iaum BM SATE 260 a : SIN MABA.CA 9M0,(A15)571-6094 N i g- FMAO°" DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA ARCHITECTURE • URBAN PLANNING ........ ........ , 8 G OIL_ -- I -i lilt f minium°, IIP" I', --:,. 03 4 '' 0 , ,E = I I'111111111.11111111 ,, c ___I__r. to I i g F 1 11 ,,,i !__A '.; I = — to = 1. .-1 I• ,P9 1 1 l': -,- — F, V , 0 , , .• ._ ,,, I:::gr. I i II'I. ,.. I I _ z ' z -a - z -a AiNI o m .., i 1. •'0 ' d — _ — ••• iii• 000 , ;•••••%- ,r,,,i, Iliik1:'!.,., . ',, 8 — 1--1 f. 1 1 '— m iiiiki--1 :,=_-'.1. 7.'11 • I ,1 3-i < 1111" r2 , ,Laiih. . .y 2. 2. iiiitti.iiil nmol .1' Il z sti .411' ____ -4 ir.,!...$1.2...:1----. „..;I- le!!'> f 1 1 ' z z" f 4 " 7.li I iipr.:'I 11rat 11,',.1 a hi 1 N " LA t-m o a p,.., ,LF mdiiiiumm 1 Jw-0 .... ___ , , .,:. . I 77TM\ i tr-1 1)11111111 '1 ' .. f'l,, I ll,. -ti '/„ . JP i. z zi ' Ei. LI C IRMUMINI ll I 1 1.1 a _ •I • a , ,, 4I,„....4.1-- ,: ..., , 9••::itr. t:::•.,,.:.. , l 1 ____ ]-- ---E i. .. owl,,, illffil.iiii', l',!!!!: -., 1.:g.,, ii--i 11.1‘ o • 41 - A — .7'.1111WP"- IIili II L > ••• 0 1 , > -, ' 11 I. ,.. n 117-.f.11+,7, ,..liq la:PI, 511-\, . ,1 ' /I" .;1 1111/1111111111111;11MM119P000 ,1-11 ,111 ' i.1 1 !,‘ 1 , ,777( : r. .ma . ,, 1.7. e5iiimiliminini, , .prlicil 17 x. x. vi— ...,,,,„.„. ,....? 11'4: . ik,:.,E,7,:I I . " ; ,I,H 51..:,:r2 r:::: T,1 fl: ;' RP-1G i ''. / L E, , 1 iic _it ,,, _ _ : --7:111101-'ii• ' , , , I ' I i 1,,, ' 17---1- * 41--All LI, 1 1_ rnir 0 infar,kii4::::; ,1 ,'41•IV,!1:, ...i• 1 I 1 MLL:111141 Zit 1I,11111 II ..• imuliponlium. .••• •••. . , L_ Him. ,....... •ill 1, , I, ::: •:::: , '17) , 19 1 • ...mn . . I 7—' • i ... " i • C. ,' .1..1-.r',11- ..• 1 . .-- - cn ermnl -. - - ____._ , .. , .%).,4.„,',A-1,-.-..-•.,-.4._ i r....) pa < aRsT FLOOR ii SECOND FLOOR> -‘NNTT:k Z Er5 Pn..... oc, I v 1 Z CO Cf . 0, . .. 1 1 1 I 1 fg)r, 511 1 'DONLAN CANYON TANA..K ATSUBO group I 20. I a - * ,,R.g FOR PARAGON GROUP • . . sm MATEO.CA_94404(4100-e004 PARAIMON ‘ . • - DUBLIN,CALIFORNIA • ...,2 . AR CHI TECTURE * UREVAN, PLANNING . ... . .- , . .. r1 I • ,_ ?gas'. .,.-.:-% i I ii�iltl O - ' O 11.(I I N'l lla a jIIIIIIIllIIIItIIj 1 1 j II' ft �� m •11• INS m 1,�ix Ili..ii ill I Run I'IL, I'I C C c ... I I l.... ii1 1 1 I I I _ c r M ii C•1 •Ai VI c, p '. IHhIn11111HINIMIIUII�I I 0 r— q �H , Ir► P= �ull� =1 ' ; Il N n Nn n 1i 1 -A. 3 Gl "' -< I 1SI a HI m ' 1E _ _ 0 i ii . 11 1), , I ll� mllllllllllllpll ..� , 1 s I t•i i u um I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�III,I,I�I,I;I�Ilul�l�'iu I I a co z 'V:1 k 1 j � Z 1 + s, u I" n3 E^ "I pIl�r--•-_ �11 I �� 111 gil u N N p 1 I f!,d 11,11 I! 0 L o 33 H111 d ,��oll� "hill !1; ding IIIIIIII I,1 1, I .... I z I . c •1 1• . + s mnn 11 1IIIIE.:Milli, II 1 L II N r I �(1I I20i H t NII r111nmmnnnlxmenlm.I L •PI C r AVM OW III ,, ihr. 1 ' -,^11-1 III I ui: II I ,,1 I 1 �L''�F�/ mu __ -� ! II U�� dill N NH 11IC °I111 I -,I,,I I�pllll,l' III to to A I �j E A . 11 NI I—: II 4y , 11 n Ilho,IIollI h Iil�mm�mamil 1111;111 I " 74 11 b ` ' ' • 1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.I: 111�� I' � 1 I„ u u "I ; I. rit 1,,,I ,,,,, , 1 I♦~ II EII I t1 I A 1' .I, � :�IIn11xx I 1!I III I .� . a 111111iI!Iupuuuumummn111II L. i -. .. liii,1. 1IIIIIN:..aII► 1 •11. ibiII IIIIIIInmimwnnnnnnmmnll'I, ,1 C!'' r __ "7*...11--, FIRST FLOOR 1 SECOND FLOOR�.:_ O Z < Rf Z coo m n7 co 3 ! 5 2I F ee1 ;U 10 DONLAN CANYON TANAKATSUBO group s. 1 I4W FA91QI MAO 6159 9.17E MO. I , i °'x o FOR PARAGON GROUP - SAN 114100 a sua(415)571-0094 i 4- DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA 9- AR CHI TECTURE7 URBAN PLANNING RECEIVED 2 0 1989 DUSLfNNOV, PIgNNING k 5 - a = __ = _ 3 li -- — J_ L= uss b al m W �_ uas � I ss• ee:: nil „ , � ` - = esax as:a 1 1 seas, — — = Ls Mal i s x y Y Liii J _ __ _ 1 OBUILDING TYPE IV - ELEVATION (BUILDINGS 9 &10) ) Z In MO Intim .311M13 Al ill *o g zies is IV OALCONIVII ark IA :: IQ 3 E1 5 •^ tail Ci 3 s IS i J1 B6 CE 1 B5 A2 A2 B5 B6 fL �< g� d 1, _ o 0 )-, -,- °----"C *II F131-441t• ;--—9. 3 LIIIIPL•31616 § @I UTUTP _ iii r_,"LiA _, Ai i 1 7 - ,,, ij B6 85 \ 1 A2 A2 B5 Be \.1 III k A k :. Iv i _; -__ _.�'�, r v PLANBUILDING TYPE IV • -- ---- •• ----�---- -- L O --- ,• BLOCS 9 k IOn� I ) OBUILDING TYPE IV - 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR PLANS (BUILDINGS 9&10) 0' 4' 8' I6' 02. A8 -' ......., ..00%. , --"- • ' _-. , . ® PM 4 ,, L 0 :::„...,.......:7i.,....„„„„„,„„,„„........ ,i!orp: Q,..,.:.i!limmill ,I !,,d i ✓ M4lit ot 1111' ,I,Iiliii' m.... g c r ;'- F 0 rz : liollgal11141.111 — 0 11 I;,,--• liiii '114., 'LillIt: 0 I— 11,7 , \ ,13„1.111014,I -1 -4 Ilil -.]T. \, rn 1,11H; in i lc') 'i-----'1(n [-- 4" . 1---,..0 < ,Hz;,, !:- .::::::•:',...;1 1,-',. ' ' '1'— in Fin) 1 % Hill I- .1.111 I a 1111'; -4 1 , , oft- NW 2 > ,I„11: 1,1 , I . Z V , , • q!I 1)< } c -4 NI II - . ,, ., ,,,, O a . , ,,, to Z I .16 Ss iltltlitillit O I " Ul II,,V,t,, it t4-1,. : 1._ i '..- Ei,: ; — ''I 7---1,ii;- :1 ill'I I- , , a 1 . ';•E tilliA;1 : id,;,:,.1,,,,,i; I,,',• , 0 _ I O 1 .,.......-.• ' A...rL-_ _-A....-0-1,I A•_I.I•16 -- 1111I11 111' 1A-_-_1 1•-11_'1110111 111111.:.1._1. l,ifll14ri,,!1'i11l'1.;i1 1 amirmuridUlfi i.!I111'10d!;1;11,'i1 • A ) II 11il 1 :: diI'' ' ! ,..p. . I iiii 1111111.111111 iii I 111:!1',111 i e-o a 0-I • • „•-•1 \ —11IIII III'1111111111111 MIMI II iii!!!!'1.1,!1','11 — , - (75 I''-' 7! n---- MU . ..;1. -I ;; I I 1;.....i.ig: ,, i-" 1 s 1 L I i i i Iiiii iii I > > 'Fhliii;11:11111:10!lliliii;illi, ii_p,Ii‘,,•,,'I !I !I, . " . L.- ! il = P :4 Milln1111111 iiiiriiwe . s 1111 II i Il 'q,li<1 V 1L1±, 1 11, fimilmilli b 4' U i billow y ,,,,, , 1 ,„...,,w, 11 III " . Iiiii:.liiiiii: 40 ..'111.11 I - ,411,1/4:. ii,,,.1:, , q A'E. it ' ',. iIi.i 1.'..7,i;Iv'',•' 1 I . IN ii ..I._111....1 . ., L_ _, 1 4_3 <.,-i • ,i....„!__' , ,...4,:_•___)„,„I...LI! .t. ::,,,,: _ . I • ,..,,,„„•,,,,,-.1,,i ,i,lin ,Y, _IIII1,6ir,,,i„,„,01 ,.:., :,.., . , ... .._, _-0 *I l• 'ili gen I.11 451111H, 1 i ., I ( II Lek -77-24'...I. I: ,' :il, • / NT AT ✓ I • itlIIiter,.,Leit.,,.. ;It:,OL,P01A.....'*:.,..'"NOW k PSI:..30,6,21,:',7--an , '.1 =4111:11.1”.. L . 1 2 111 '7-7-.7.' iill,. I; ill'l ' „:. ,t ,--- a. . .'. , 1 , .., .._.,...,, ,::::, . .,,,,,„„ ..:, ,,.„,,,„,„..,.,.,,I, ,.„ ,li I Et il • -..=in:1 41 s:i. 1 co 03 1,!' ' ':•: '!` '.1.!,: ! • A A I J.?:.::I..,' .•[ ;ip/:,',;'!,111, • \I • ( I 111111111111111111MMUM1111111"linlY11. i li i 1 A 2 ineviumearm 111111 IN I''''‘Ri.!lei 11111111111111111k 6-7-1,liiii,• I/ ,o, to (r, , ..„, . ... . , 1 L_ li II II II 1 ,. i --> ilia a ; . p.q...„, ....don_Linl I 1 t 1; . • • s I . ' IIIIIIIIIIIIiiIIIIIIMIMME 1 - I 1' Ai . IN3. in , • 11111E :I II-1111111 1' 1 •... I,I,I,_..., 1••••) Ali'il 3> C:) ..1 L_ Als—'s "16.-ellb, • ,, .„.1 .001:% 111, , 2 • -- <, um mil , ,____. „, , to in In!•.. 0.,17.!7,,I.,:,....-:111111 ,i;,,1.! .I 11 Z,, _ - CO Z CO 0 iiirtars_mnoo.... . , . , , - 04 . - --,- ,:• . . \''..4:---4%-7-,-..-- ' ... ..-v_..a. -- . . FIRST FLOOR . SECOND FLOOR - '''', ae-i• • .A . f ' • * @ DONLAN CANYON TANAKATSUBO group - FOR PARAGON GROUP DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA , . ' ARCHITECTURE o URBAN PLANNING 1' 0 4'A'� II IIu14no m!1 y .r �I!II' c �'*' r. .0 °"i ' ��„ T 1111\\ i�C h is iHi. i1 p ii1{{r i,1ll1 II m 'mown m" II ii v Ai ( I m IINI 1I — ',,i II‘-i'l /1 1- 1I x. Iiw1I IIaIIIuI lZ /it � l I I IIim J Et :imlWtillif IA. -** 3 a,n . lilllt,: {!IlAa;::i{11II i 'LlI ' m W tLt�� ® ® I m_ I mitt INii `PI h'h .I II I,. o � i I '\ y� 6 � 1 x PIA .,,. ��' -: it III , I I ,1I 1 _ 0111 ���� A ri 1 s ,11 1.110511.S11,i 1 Ig1` N' m y 'j, i i 1{i+ � 1 IIh I �II -�1�111 ��44 /�I 1I m NtlJ l:::: I nii <a\ m I I it = III ll)I 11 II ! I �• 1 { A ,i{ ullll 111boI �IIIIII m 1 rill NH < 11 1110'1 '13 ''' {�'illll p : j1: .•:1 Ili:: � �� j �I f. • (I III I I MI111111W z . 4,, Citi r t II m 11 101.1I Iuli,i iv G D I ! oQ 1 • L Ih ! r z i 1 ;,. I'll 1 rn �11 II 1 > �I, 1 1 Z I °'Iiiinrn"ilillitf..'4� {i, i i �I e� O o z 1�� 1 II Z c r 7r t A (43 TIT '�`_�i;' Nee`� in f i }' o I � 6 B ' <7 E I gi DONLAN CANYON TANAKATSUBO:group 1 t e S I ; 7A FOR PARAGON GROUPSAN MAIM CA 94404 ON �,yh . PARAGON g t2 DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA A R CHI T EC TARE e URBAN PLANNING ' 17-6• -e 69._6- ' i fl" i'ILi' Efl r- ,'„ PI P lIES 0 •gi idd i sumo . mi T. 4� 9 uu I 1 d � ■_u.� x T 13 �� 1 ,. 2 ES I B a 7 ■ ■ ' 62-0- j mu moon' .mom m � 0 . -- _• ___--•-- In N I Z I 0 I r •_ 0 33 I== Tx m • Z CC ■ ■ I • OI II I tiji • ED = 1.. tub z I 4IP X i\) ny -Cc) in 1 ; TANAKATSUBO t r up �F , ` 1 e o^2 a @ DONLAN CANYON rf r g LL+J6 i . a± • s ; 3 g FOR PARAGON GROUP w yN w q So ?e"' Fg LA WARM DUBLIN. CALIFORNIA 'T 1 #. "` A;, • t ARCHITECTURE ';1 ,ug4Kr .1.0 • Nsfr'."%`=71f,P.yob1 0 ,, III I ,,,, Y JZA 2 Tr. . j m 1 i,i, l [L-..+sue 1. +I_ a 1� (1) I;,; rm III�I 1I I. Ili; I1�jl' ;II ; I II l\ Il,.;l r r1 ' 11, 111 11 i l[ ' ,I ' ' 1 I - l ll 1 ill l Z p �11 1 �1 I 1 .3 I 1 c III, ' ! Z ni i t ,, 11 I a rn 1 ,��y) I I I I 1 II I ; I • 6,6 m ;l I I I l ■:�■/�p�1Ilpmml < I I I .'� Ill II I II..iI NN� �' > I llltil l ' ,# :,;;l' i I,l I IIIII Illil I IIIIiiIIIIIIIiIIIIII III Illy 1 Z I, -Ii rill 11 III; Il, . ll��, 11 I I 11 I I III t I I I ',t � � i III NE 'I I?IL 1, IiIICiFR1Etf'i?tlliil3ilq'Riiiittiitlit,l j,I'' 11 I I I 'I I I I I li I , :Iiiliililiil4;l. �I�` , . , l. , t.,�l 1, � 1 1 J�IIllllll�q..l� i i om 4 1 I1 1 I 111 /,1 _, fi 1 1 'I� 1 ,1-(III 7 lull ,I,I dl H Itil,II I }li l �J1I II lfmt tablii1iiiitliHlP'I III I:II ,I. lissr tt[t hRfitf [fit tt.1 1111 t' v ;I :',.:1."'IL 1 II ',,� ,I! P i1lti i t sll.l.)'i;6 ,ul'`III• i I . •1•1t'il m ,�L,,I 1 I i1,1 i I' 111111 i 1 111f iiiiiili i i1 I' I II'II;'',I j v 03 r— a) m Z el f m • Z C Z CO m Z a cc a • 12,1 s I i : H a a1 DONLAN CANYON TANAKATSUBO group ' �' FOR PARAGON GROUP 1100°"SN0Nsun SATE t60 i ; ! i e SAN IIMEO,CA 94404(415)S71-6W4 a N i Z PARAGON DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA ARCH!TECTURE o URBAN PLANNING A a. 'sy r,,, _.-g ,/, I t t. 1 , 1 ,. : O ZIII,I ,'I 1 O , . � I l. ,, m I ll' I I _, I N > IIII 'I 1 1 _, i Cl, „ I � ni 11 1 I r 11111111w x I' < •; m 'i -I i i, I I 'Ii!l�IT � 11111/ ° , a I I. • - •� z ° lnn ;1 I IIItIY =z II'Ii I 11 IIH 11111 • 1 ..III II: . I i , !•I' '1 III 1 III L,,' ! 'ill 1 IIIII ,.1 I IIltl.ull u 1 I1 1:3ft; '•- l•IUI•:I I - «'-0- ,w11 1' O h� %at er I .I I '` as '. �iI II j II II ' I>co> o O z 1 I ll11l 1 1 D I,I ll 111 p — `. 1 m m z r I !l 1 -1:1> mu .! Ib1 p a g ', Z a `�°; ,, �� III .'L. II Ill) _-� v !IIlIIII f'.I I �. 11 z O II1I;III 0 n ri. O c III II IIi 11'I lljl I. II a 1111 i111I. !) I� � -I 111 .,I iv,1 r 7 I `1 , �, iI I II I� ' I IF CI �. MI w p /may ill 16-8• , ;... Z l ) Tv err ii . 01 . e D O Z C 2_ CO Ptfi Z CC 01 0 4 ° m (g DONLAN CANYON TANAKATSUBO group pp o '�+J i i > FOR PARAGON GROUP 1400 FASHION ISLAND NEw.4nTE 260 i t $AN MATEO,'CA 94404(415)571-6094 A foll A • PARAGON - DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA ARCHITECTURE a URBAN PLANNING �F .ter—aI � --�z�••yam =j:�`� 1 r xp �s v � oZ <-1 z0 s4LLLLL T'-0•MIN TIP. 111111 = A '_ �.- 0 r I- x.. xx _ simmil i. x. 0 0 0 . ax. x. xx s xi d 6 o I 33 a 33 s f d 604 T i = tz z m m m zo zo — m 0 9 P • m m I °z - 9 ° Z _ L L 1 m II I L J a . -I 0 z O traW 0 R7, 2 C o'R ni z us f►f tz Cc) 3 1 kI E : p e DONLAN CANYON TANAKATSUBO group 1 9 - { i IgiFOR PARAGON GROUP 1400 fASIKR Isuxo 0.b.WIE 2Po i SW MATEO.CA 94404(415)3714094 DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA ARCHITECTURE e URBAN PLANNING C A D p COMPUTER APPLICATIONS FOR �aESIeNPRO;6IOssALS 40 9 4° s:El: FEET 2 . ' \(0 1:120 /7i-4\ \\ C-- RECEIVED A1Y \ \\\ j\1li \ _r APR 25 ��o�H PLANNING = \\I\ 1 ic,7L _ -----\ \ / ii II \ , \\ \ //// li \— \ \ \\ I 11 ll KNN \\ ‘ . \\ T v-\\\\M\\\\\ \ ‘A\\ \\ ' \ 4 \ \ \1 \ \\ \\\ 0\\\\\\ '\'\ \\‘‘\\ k\ I \\\ \ \ \ \ \ A ‘4\ \ \ \ A\\\\. '' A \ \ \\ \\ \ IV \ \ / \ \\ \\\ \ 44\\"\ \ \ S4 il �\\4\\\\\ iit lu i � I . )i \\\ 1 Hi - \ \ \ &/. ///,i' // I i /// L \ IN \ /ill \\# ' \ ‘‘ ‘ S /T // 10*/ //// iliffiggan prosissr...16 \ ,411444, 11.11///fr ,. r_ W\WWitt7\• ------_--- -%\Ntr0:244(1 1 1 i /7//r I \tkivt0;:*** 1/1/A ; -,[-\ / 1\/ri - - •. ‘WW:liklk% I/Mc- 't , \ . It-:; V 0) \\\\ i 0-F', \ \ \\ , , -••'--''''' -7 */ . ..':'‘- ('''',„..::::..,..' \N !!i,w- , - _ ‘=____ ikv .:-:. . .-._ -- -.„:40---- — cu,,, , _ , _ :::',:,,po, 13141 N\\ •V‘'‘ ria\ `...-- - EX 1- FT fi N \• • ' \ *.S. XVitk 11\ . SffictQS /Th.d v RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON WHEREAS, the Paragon Group has requested approval of a Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation of 196+ acres to allow 17 single family lots on approximately 10 acres, and 300 multi-family units on 16+ acres, approximately 170+ acres of open space, in unincorporated Alameda County, west of Silvergate Drive, north of the western terminus of Dublin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared pursuant to Section 15153(c) and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines finding that the project, as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment and that the earlier EIR prepared for the Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment, an earlier project, PA 87-012 (SCH No. 88100406), was used to document that finding; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the Negative Declaration at a public hearing on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find: 1. That the PD Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation for the Donlan Canyon project PA 89-125 will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline regulations. 3. That the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate. 1;14t.C. QR 85- 12.s 104,6°-C 3440.4 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend City Council approval of the Negative Declaration for PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -2- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AND ESTABLISHING FINDINGS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PREZONING CONCERNING PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON WHEREAS, the Paragon Group has requested approval of a Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map, and Annexation of 196+ acres to allow 17 single-family lots on approximately 10 acres and 300 multi-family units on 16+ acres with approximately 170+ acres of open space in unincorporated Alameda County, west of Silvergate Drive, north of the western terminus of Dublin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings to consider the request on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper public notice of this request was given in all respects as required by law for the Planning Commission hearings; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Planned Development Prezoning subject to conditions prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard and considered all said reports, recommendations and written and oral testimony submitted at the public hearing as herein above set forth; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State law (CEQA) and regulations, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby find: 1. The proposed prezoning, as conditioned, is consistent with the City General Plan and Policies; and 2. The proposed prezoning will not have a significant environmental impact; and 3. The prezoning, as conditioned, is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area, and will not overburden public services; and 4. The prezoning will not have substantial adverse effects on health or safety, or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare, or be injurious to property or public improvements. PD 9A$y- its Don le., ties. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends City Council approval of PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Prezoning subject to the general provisions listed below: GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Provisions Applicable to Single Family and Multi-Family Development 1. Intent: This approval is for Planned Development Prezoning PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon. This PD District is established to provide for and regulate the development of multi-family dwelling units and custom single-family dwelling units. This approval prezones 10+ acres for PD low-density single family custom lots 17 units, 16+ acres for multi- family condo/apartments 300 units, and 170+ acres open space/parkland. Development shall be generally consistent with the following submittals labeled Exhibit A on file with the Dublin Planning Department: a. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevation Plans prepared by Tanakatsubo Group consisting of 14 sheets dated received May 31, 1990. b. Preliminary Landscape Plans prepared by Camp and Camp Associates consisting of 5 sheets dated received May 31, 1990. c. Tentative Map prepared by Aliquot consisting of 7 sheets dated received May 24, 1990. d. Building envelopes prepared by CADP dated received April 25, 1990. 2. Site Development Review: All structures shall be subject to the Site Development Review procedures established in the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance unless a Site Development Review waiver is approved by the Planning Director and a zoning approval is granted upon the determination that the construction constitutes a minor project and building permit plans are in accord with the intent and objectives of the Site Development Review procedures. 3. Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this PD District, all applicable and general requirements of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall be applied to development within this PD District. 4. The design, location and material of all fencing and retaining walls shall be subject to approval of Site Development Review unless Site Development Review requirement is waived by the Planning Director. 5. All graded cut and fill slope areas shall be revegetated with native trees, shrubs and grasses subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and Public Works Director and Site Development Review approval. 6. All landscape areas within open space and common areas shall be subject to approval of Site Development Review. - 2 - n 7. Appropriate all weather surface vehicular access to open space (to existing ranch road north of multi-family project) shall be provided and maintained on a continuous basis, to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief, Public Works Director and Planning Director. 8. All signs established for identification of this project shall be subject to approval of Site Development Review in regards to location, copy and design. 9. Except as may be specifically provided for within these General Provisions for PA 89-125, development shall comply with City of Dublin Site Development Review Standard Conditions (Attachment 1). 10. Except as may be specifically provided for within this PD, development shall comply with City of Dublin Residential Security Requirements (Attachment 2). 11. CC&R's shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Director prior to recordation of the Final Subdivision Map. 12. The Applicant shall submit an Open Space/Landscape Management Plan subject to review and approval of the Public Works Director and Planning Director in conjunction with Site Development Review. 13. A master trail system plan for the open space area shall be submitted and shall be subject to approval of Site Development Review. 14. Fire buffer zone between development area and open space area shall be provided and maintained by property owners on a continuous basis to the satisfaction of the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority Fire Chief. 15. The fire buffer zone including a list of acceptable plant materials shall be subject to Site Development Review approval. 16. Required parking shall not be located within required setback areas. 17. The developer shall confer with local postal authorities to determine the type of centralized mail receptacles necessary and provide a letter from the Postal Service stating their satisfaction at the time the Site Development Review submittal is made. Specific locations for such units shall be to the satisfaction of the Postal Service and the Dublin Planning Department. If centralized mail units are not required, the developer shall provide written documentation from the Postmaster stating the exemption. 18. Minor modifications in the design, but not the use, may be approved by Staff. Any other change will require Planning Commission approval through the Conditional Use Permit review process or, depending on the magnitude of the modification, submittal of a new Planned Development Rezoning submittal. - 3 - r"N 19. Proposed water tanks shall be sited and appropriately screened to diminish visual impacts. Site specific visual studies shall be reviewed during the Site Development Review application stages. B. Provisions Applicable to Single Family Residential 1. Yards (setbacks): The minimum requirement for yards shall be as follows: a. Depth of Front Yard (setback): 20 foot minimum Exception: 1) 10 foot minimum for units with side vehicular entrance garages (also see Building height exceptions) and 2) Lots 11, 12 and 13 may deviate from the 20 foot minimum setback subject to approval of Site Development Review finding that either the topographic or vegetative constraints (based upon approved Tree Preservation Study) of the site prevent the development from complying with the 20 foot minimum setback. In no event shall the front yard setback for Lots 11, 12 and 13 be less than 5 feet from the garage. b. Rear Yard (setback): 20 foot minimum, 15 foot minimum clear and level zone Exception: 1) Section 8.26.6.1 Alternate Provisions of Rear Yard (compensating yards) of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance shall apply to building additions; 2) 10-foot minimum for shade structures attached to the unit provided the shade structure is not enclosed (enclosed means more than one vertical wall); 3) Lots 11, 12, and 13 required setbacks will be determined by the approved Tree Preservation Study (see provisions # B6, 7, 8, 9 and 10); and 4) deviation or deck alternative to 15 foot minimum clear and level requirement subject to Site Development Review approval if demonstrated that grading will be minimized. In no case shall the required clear and level area be less than 5 feet. c. Side Yard (setbacks): 5 foot minimum with 25 foot total aggregate side yard setback required. 5 foot wide minimum clear and level zone each side yard. Exception: 1) 15 foot minimum side yard setback for street side yard of corner lot; 2) Lots 11, 12 and 13 setbacks subject to Tree Preservation Study (see Provision # B6, 7, 8, 9 and 10); and 3) decks may be provided when 5 foot wide minimum clear and level is not possible due to topography or vegetation subject to Site Development Review approval. d. General Development Provisions: i. Fireplaces, chimneys and air conditioning units shall not encroach within the required clear and level zone. Other encroachments shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval. - 4 - ii. Roof eaves, pop-outs, bays, architectural projections and columns may project 3 feet into required yards subject to compliance with building code requirements. iii. Accessory structures located in required yards shall be subject to the provisions of Section 8-60.20 through 8- 60.32, 8-60.59 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Exception: 1) accessory structures shall maintain 3 foot minimum required setback; and 2) accessory structures located on Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 shall maintain rear yard setback in compliance with site specific visual analysis prepared during Site Development Review. 2. Building Height: 35 foot maximum or two and one half (2-1/2) stories at any one point. Building height shall be measured from the finished grade at the perimeter of the building to the top of the structure. Exception: 1) building height for units with garage 10 foot front yard setbacks, shall not exceed one (1) foot for each one (1) foot the building is setback from the back of sidewalk. However, architectural features and elements may exceed this provision by a 2 foot maximum, and a gable element may exceed this provision by 5 foot maximum; 2) maximum building height on Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 shall generally conform to the building envelopes established in Exhibit A. Specific height limits for these lots shall be subject to Site Development Review approval; and 3) Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may deviate from the established building envelope, subject to approval of Site Development Review and additional site specific visual analysis. 3. Lot Depth: 100 foot minimum. 4. Lot size: 15,000 square foot minimum. 5. Lot width: 40 foot minimum (street frontage), median lot width: 100 foot minimum. 6. Principle structures shall be prohibited within the dripline of the existing woodlands area located on Lots 11, 12 and 13 of the Tentative Map unless tree preservation study approved by the Planning Director determines that principle structures located within the dripline will not adversely impact the woodland area. 7. Prior to issuance of grading permits and/or Site Development Review approval for Lots 11, 12 and 13 a detailed tree survey, horticultural report and tree preservation study shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 8. The tree preservation study shall identify everything necessary to preserve the existing trees on site including setbacks, drainage, irrigation, construction activity, and on going maintenance. - 5 - 9. Landscape features (such as decks, trellis, benches, spas) shall be permitted within the dripline of the woodland area on Lots 11, 12 and 13 subject to approval of tree preservation study. 10. The on-going maintenance of the trees in conformance with approved tree preservation study (see Provision B7 and 8) with the existing woodland area on Lots 11, 12 and 13 shall be the responsibility of the individual property owners of the lots in which the trees are located. Requirement for maintenance of said trees shall be incorporated into the CC&Rs. 11. Parking: minimum 2 covered parking spaces per dwelling unit required. 12. Except as specifically modified by the provisions of this PD (PA 89-125) District, the lots developed in the single family residential portion of this PD District shall be subject to the regulations of the R-1 District regarding land use and minimum/maximum development criteria. C. Provisions Applicable to Multi-Family Residential Setbacks - Multi-Family 1. A 20 foot minimum front yard setback is required. The setback is measured from the property line to the closest point of the building structure. Upon the developer's/applicant's acquisition of all or part of Parcel C, as shown on the tentative map, the setback shall be measured from the new property line created as a result of said acquision. 2. Landscape features such as ponds, fountains, trellises, benches and pedestrian walkways or soundwall (as may be required by an acoustical study) may be permitted within said front yard setback subject to Site Development Review approval. 3. A 10 foot minimum setback between building wall (the exterior side of building walls containing heated space) and parking areas/drive aisle/roadways shall be required. Building Height - Multi-Family 4. The maximum permitted building height for residential buildings is 40 feet. Exception: Architectural features and elements may exceed this provision by a maximum of 2 feet. Gable elements may exceed this provision by 5 feet maximim. 5. The maximum permitted building height for the recreation building is 35 feet. Exception: Architectural features and elements may exceed this provision to a maximum of 15 feet subject to Site Development Review approval. 6. The perceived visual bulk and massing of buildings 1 and 2 shall be reduced through design modification to roof facade blending with background. Design, material, and colors are subject to Site Development Review approval. - 6 - 7. Accessory structures located within private open space areas (patio and deck areas assigned to individual units) shall maintain 3 foot minimum rearyard and sideyard setbacks. 8. The maximum building height for accessory structures within private open space areas shall not exceed 15 feet. 9. Accessory structures shall be subject to zoning approval, regardless of whether building permits are required. 10. Accessory structures within common open space areas shall be subject to Site Development Review and approval. 11. Master Plan for accessory structures identifying acceptable type/size, designs, colors and materials of accessory structures shall be submitted for review subject to Site Development Review approval. Parking - Multi-family 12. A minimum of 2 parking spaces per unit is required. 13. A minimum of 1 parking space per unit shall be covered and assigned to a specific unit. 14. A minimum 15% of the overall number of parking spaces provided shall be reserved and designated on pavement for guest parking only. 15. 35% of uncovered parking spaces may be compact parking spaces. 16. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 17. Required minimum parking dimensions: A) Covered 9' x 20' B) Standard uncovered 9' x 18' C) Compact uncovered 8' x 17' Length reduction exception: A 2 foot overhang is permitted for covered car-port type, standard and compact uncovered parking spaces 18. Private vehicular accessways shall comply with the City of Dublin Preliminary Residential Condominium Development Guidelines (Attachment 3), with the exception that accessways with carport type covered parking may comply with Attachment 4, subject to Site Developement approval. Private Useable Open Space - Multi-Family 19. Private and common open space shall comply with the City of Dublin Preliminary Residential Condominium Development Guidelines. - 7 - eN 20. At-grade patios for the multiple family residential units shall be individually fenced and shall be supplied with soil preparation to accommodate future planting. Individual hose bibs for each ground level unit patio area shall be provided by the developer. The layout of the enclosed patio areas (as regards size and placement of concrete patio pads and the design of the enclosing fencing and retaining walls) shall be subject to review and approval as part of the respective Site Development Review submittal. Storage - Multi-Family 21. Separate individual lockable and waterproof storage space shall be assigned to each unit. Said storage space shall contain a minimum of 120 cubic feet with a minimum dimension of 4 feet. The location is subject to Site Development Review approval. Refuse Collection/Recycling Collection - Multi-Family 22. Refuse collection areas shall be provided within enclosed areas of solid and substantial materials. The design shall be compatible with the architecture of the project and the height shall exceed the refuse container. The size, design, location and number of refuse collection areas shall be subject to Site Development approval. 23. Recycling collection containment areas shall be provided throughout the project. The specific size, location, design and number of containment areas shall be subject to Site Development Review approval. Energy - Multi-Family 24. All multi-family units shall be provided with separately metered gas for hot water. All meters shall be screened from view within an enclosure that is compatible in design, location and materials to that of the building to which it is to be installed. 25. Exterior lighting fixtures in multi-family areas shall be energy efficient, fluorescent or metal vapor lighting. 26. Landscape design shall incorporate use of solar shading for south and west facing walls in multi-family housing areas. 27. Recreation area pools in the multi-family project shall incorporate solar heaters. The developer shall submit documentation that the number, size, location and design of the solar collector panels will suffice to provide adequate pool heating for a reasonable length of time in each calendar year. Heating of the pools may be supplemented by gas heaters. Miscellaneous Multi-family 28. Should the units be initially occupied as apartment units, all appliances shall either be replaced with new units or the initial buyers provided with a one-year's parts and warranty guarantee on all appliances. - 8 - 29. A pedestrian circulation plan shall be submitted as part of the Site Development Review materials. The plan shall include section details of the pathway system and a detailed pedestrian walkway lighting plan. 30. Light standards (freestanding, pedestrian and/or wall mounted) utilized in this project shall be of a design which shields the light sources from view from off-site while providing for adequate security and safety illumination. Light standards shall be subject to review and approval as part of the Site Development Review submittal in regards to design, location, number and illumination intensity. 31. Handicapped ramps and access as required by Title 24, State of California, shall be provided (parking and walkways serving on-site recreational facilities). Handicapped parking stalls, appropriately signed, shall be provided evenly throughout the project with their location and design as part of the Site Development Review submittal and approval. - 9 - CITY OF DUBLIN SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARD CONDITIONS All projects approved by the City of Dublin shall meet the following standard conditions unless specifically exempted by the Planning Department. 1. Final building and site development plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. All such plans shall insure: a. That standard commercial or residential security requirements as established by the Dublin Police Department are provided. b. That ramps, special parking spaces, signing, and other appropriate physical features for the handicapped, are provided throughout the site for all publicly used facilities. c. That continuous concrete curbing is provided for all parking stalls. d. That exterior lighting of the building and site is not directed onto adjacent properties and the light source is shielded from direct offsite viewing. e. That all mechanical equipment, including electrical and gas meters, is architecturally screened from view, and that electrical transformers are either undergrounded or architecturally screened. f. That all trash enclosures are of a sturdy material (preferably masonry) and in harmony with the architecture of the building(s). g. That all vents, gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc., are painted to match the color of adjacent surface. h. That all materials and colors are to be as approved by the Dublin Planning Department. Once constructed or installed, all improvements are to be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. Any changes which affect the exterior character shall be resubmitted to the Dublin Planning Department for approval. i. That each parking space designated for compact cars be identified with a pavement marking reading "Small Car Only" or its equivalent, and additional signing be provided if necessary. j. That all exterior architectural elements visible from view and not detailed on the plans be finished in a style and in materials in harmony with the exterior of the building. k. That all other public agencies that require review of the project be supplied with copies of the final building and site plans and that compliance be obtained with at least their minimum Code requirements. AJTACHMENPTZ eS 2. Final landscape plans, irrigation system plans, tree preservation techniques, and guarantees, shall be reviewed and approved by the Dublin Planning Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. All such submittals shall insure: a. That plant material is utilized which will be capable of healthy growth within the given range of soil and climate. b. That proposed landscape screening is of a height and density so that it provides a positive visual impact within three years from the time of planting. c. That unless unusual circumstances prevail, at least 75% of the proposed trees on the site are a minimum of 15 gallons in size, and at least 50% of the proposed shrubs on the site are minimum of 5 gallons in size. d. That a plan for an automatic irrigation system be provided which assures that all plants get adequate water. In unusual circumstances, and if approved by Staff, a manual or quick coupler system may be used. e. That concrete curbing is to be used at the edges of all planters and paving surfaces. f. That all cut and fill slopes in excess of 5 feet in height are rounded both horizontally and vertically. g. That all cut and fill slopes graded and not constructed on by September 1, of any given year, are hydroseeded with perennial or native grasses and flowers, and that stock piles of loose soil existing on that date are hydroseeded in a similar manner. h. That the area under the drip line of all existing oaks, walnuts, etc., which are to be saved are fenced during construction and grading operations and no activity is permitted under them that will cause soil compaction or damage to the tree. i. That a guarantee from the owners or contractors shall be required guaranteeing all schrubs and ground cover, all trees, and the irrigation system for one year. j. That a permanent maintenance agreement on all landscaping will be required from the owner insuring regular irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement. 3. Final inspection or occupancy permits will not be granted until all construction and landscaping is complete in accordance with approved plans and the conditions required by the City. fl" " "ro�" CITY OF DUBLIN \ � /� P.O.Box 2340,Dublin,California 94568 • City Offices,100 Civic Plaza,Dublin,California 94568 CITY OF DUBLIN RESIDENTIAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS City Ordinance No. 21-89 1988 Building Code Section 4101 1. Exterior doors. All exterior wood doors shall be of solid wood construction, no less than 1 3/4 inches thick or hollow metal doors. Except for sliding glass doors, exterior doors shall not have glazing larger than 2" unless glazing is 1/4" tempered glass. 2. Locking devices. Exterior swinging doors shall have a lock on the latching device and an auxiliary cylinder dead-bolt. The dead-bolt shall be hardened steel and have a 1" throw. If the cylinder of the lock protrudes from the face of the door it shall be fitted with a cylinder ring guard so it cannot be gripped with pliers or other wrenching devices. Double doors shall have the inactive leaf secured with flush bolts at top and bottom. The bolts shall be hardened steel 1/4" minimum in diameter and shall engage a metal strike plate to a minimum depth of 3/8". 3. Strike plates. Strike plates for wood jambs shall be the high security type and shall be secured with a minimum of two wood screws 3" long which shall engage the door studs. 4. Jambs. Inswinging doors with wood jambs shall have rabitted jambs. The jambs on the strike side shall have solid shims above and below the strike plates and the opposite jamb shall have solid shims at the level of the strike plate. Both door studs shall be reinforced with horizontal solid blocking at the approximate height of strike. 5. Hinges. Exterior hinges and hinges of outswinging doors from the garage to the dwelling shall have non-removable pins. 6. Sliding glass doors. Sliding glass doors shall comply with Chapter 54. Sliding glass doors shall be fitted with a locking device that shall engage the strike sufficiently to prevent its being disengaged by any possible movement of the door within the space or clearances provided for installation and operation. The bolt and strike shall be reinforced by hardened material so as to prevent their separation by pulling, prying or similar attack. An auxiliary locking device shall be installed on the door which may be a pin, lock, or similar device of not less than 1/4" diameter. The pin shall be of hardened material and engage the metal portion of the sliding door. The primary locking device shall be operable by a keyed or code lock inside. Doors with 2 sliding panels shall be locked at the meeting rails and shall have an auxiliary locking device as described above. 7. Entry vision. All main or front entry doors shall be fitted with a viewing device having a field of view of not less than 180 degrees. ATTACHMEN12 Administration(415)833-6650•City Council (415)833-660. --- Code Enforcement(415)833-6620 • Engin. Police(415)833-6670 • Public WorksTou,,-wu.-- - -- 8. Windows. All accessible dwelling windows shall be secured as follows: a) Sliding glass windows shall be secured on the inside with a locking device capable of withstanding prying or wrenching. An auxiliary lock shall be installed on each sliding window that prevents movement in the sliding track. b) Louvered windows shall not be used within eight feet of ground level, adjacent structures, or fire escapes. c) Casement type windows shall be secured with a metal to metal locking device contacting both frames of the window at the meeting edge. Auxiliary locks such as a pin that penetrates both frame structures shall be installed on casement and double hung windows. d) Windows fitted with a crank type gear opening device shall be fitted with a positive window lock that engages metal to metal. Windows shall not be located within 40 inches of the locking device of any door unless protected by a steel grill with 1/4" minimum diameter bars not more than 2" on center or by a screen with 1/8" diameter wire mesh more than 2" on center mounted on the inside or glazed with 1/4" tempered glass. 9. Garage doors. Vehicle garage doors shall be secured with a metal to metal locking device that prevents the door from being pulled or pried up from the outside. No electric garage door openers shall be permitted that will automatically activate when the door is forced open. Garage doors fitted with automatic openers shall be permited with an alternative form of locking device activated from the interior of the garage. Other garage doors shall comply with all of the provisions of this section. 10. Storage areas. Any exterior storage area attached to a dwelling, apartment or condominium and enclosed by a door shall comply with this section or have a minimum 3/8" diameter hardened padlock hasp. 1/90 CITY OF DUBLIN PRELIMINARY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Primary Guidelines 1. Parking 2 . Open Space 3 . Private Vehicular Accessways 4 . Storage 5. Refuse Collection 6 . Site Development Review Standard Conditions 7 . Standard Residential Security Requirements Secondary Guidelines 8 . Alameda County Land Use & Development Plan Objectives , Principles and Standards 9 . Guidelines for Authorizing Construction or Conversion of Condominium. . . Projects . ATTACHMENTk-5 - Form: DP 83-02 1/7/83 1. Parking Requirements Two spaces per unit, one of which must be covered and assigned to a specific unit. A minimum of 15% of the parking spaces shall be reserved for guest parking only. No more than 25% of the site can be paved for road or parking purposes. Covered parking stalls shall be 9'x 20'. Uncovered parking stalls for standard cars shall be 9'x 18' and for compact cars 8'x 17'. A 2' overhang is permitted. 35% of the uncovered parking stalls may be for compact cars. 2. Open Space Fifty per cent of the site shall contain useable common open space. An open space area must be at least 15 feet wide to be counted as open space. Decks, patios and balconies must be at least 7' wide to be counted as open space. Each ground level unit shall have at least 200 sq. ft. of private useable open space (e.g. decks, patios and balconies) directly adjacent to the unit. Each above grade unit shall have at least 70 sq. ft. of private useable open space directly adjacent to the unit. This space must have a minimum dimension of 6 feet. 3. Private Vehicular Accessways Without parking on either side 20 feet 90° uncovered on one side only 26 feet 90° covered parking on one side only 30 feet 90° uncovered on both sides 30 feet 90° covered on both sides 32 feet 90° covered on one side and uncovered 32 feet on the other side Sidewalks with handicapped ramps shall be provided to allow resident and visitors to walk through the development without needing to utilize the vehicular accessways. 4. Storage Each unit shall have at least 120 cubic feet of individual lockable and water-proofed storage space assigned it. The space must have a minimum dimension of 4 feet. 5. Refuse Collection Refuse collection areas shall be enclosed by solid and substantial materials; the design of which shall be compatible with the architecture of the project, and the height of which must exceed the height of the refuse containers. 6. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARD CONDITIONS CITY OF DUBLIN All projects approved by the City of Dublin shall meet the following standard conditions unless specifically exempted by the Planning Department. 1. Final building and site development plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. All such plans shall insure: a. That standard cammercial or residential security requirements as established by the Dublin Police Department are provided. b. That ramps, special parking spaces, signing, and other apprupriate physical features for the handicapped, are provided throughout the site for all publicly used facilities. c. That continuous concrete curbing is provided for all parking stalls. d. That exterior lighting of the building and site is not directed onto adjacent properties and the light source is shielded fran direct offsite viewing. e. That all mechanical equipment, including electrical and gas meters, is architecturally screened fran view, and that electrical trans- formers are either undergrounded or architecturally screened. f. That all trash enclosures are of a sturdy material (preferably masonry) and in harmony with the architecture of the building(s). g. That all vents, gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc., are painted to match the color of adjacent surface. h. That all materials and colors are to be as approved by the Dublin Planning Department. Once constructed or installed, all improvements are to be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. Any changes which affect the exterior character shall be resubmitted to the Dublin Planning Department for approval. i. That each parking space designated for compact cars be identified with a pavement marking reading "Small Car Only" or its equivalent, and ailitional signing be provided if necessary. j. That all exterior architectural elements visible fran view and not detailed on the plans be finished in a style and in materials in harmony with the exterior of the building. k. That all other public agencies that require review of the project be supplied with copies of the final building and site plans and that compliance be obtained with at 1Paat their minimum Cade requirements. n n 2. Final Landscape Plans, irrigation system plans, tree preservation tech- niques, and guarantees, shall be reviewed and approved by the Dublin Planning Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. All such submittals shall insure: a. That plant material is utilized which will be capable of healthy growth within the given range of soil and climate. b. That proposed landscape screening is of a height and density so that it provides a positive visual impact within three years fran the time of planting. c. That unless unusual circumstances prevail, at least 75% of the proposed trees on the site are a minimum of 15 gallons in size, and at least 50% of the proposed shrubs on the site are minimum of 5 gallons in size. d. That a plan for an automatic irrigation system be provided which assures that all plants get adequate water. In unusual circumstances, and if approved by Staff, a manual or quick coupler system may be used. e. That concrete curbing is to be used at the edges of all planters and paving surfaces. f. That all cut and fill slopes in excess of 5 feet in height are rounded both horizontally and vertically. g. That all cut and fill slopes graded and not constructed on by September 1, of any given year, are hydroseeded with perennial or native grasses and flowers, and that stock piles of loose soil existing on that date are hydroseeded in a similar manner. h. That the area under the drip line of all existing oaks, walnuts, etc., which are to be saved are fenced during construction and grading operations and no activity is permitted under them that will cause soil compaction or damage to the tree. i. That a guarantee from the owners or contractors shall be required guaranteeing all shrubs and ground cover, all trees, and the irrigation system for one year. j. That a permanent maintenance agreement on all landscaping will be required fran the owner insuring regular irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement. 3. Final inspection or occupancy permits will not be granted until all construction and landscaping is complete in accordance with approved plans and the conditions required by the City, or a bond has been posted to cover all costs of the unfinished work, plus 25%. CITY OF DUBLIN POLICE SERVI('R 7. STANDARD RESIDENTIAL BUILDING SECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS I. DOORS a) Exterior doors and doors leading from garage areas into private family dwellings shall be of solid core, no less than 1-3/4 inches thick. b) Exterior doors and doors leading from garage areas into private family dwellings shall have auxiliary locks that resist prying or wrenching. These locks may be deadbolt cylinder locks of one inch throw, rim locks, or locks of equivalent burglary resistant construction. The exterior function of the lock may be keyed or ruled. The interior function of the lock shall be by a turn piece. c) Breakable decorative or vision panels in exterior doors or within reach of the inside activating device shall be protected by ironwork or steel grills securely fastened to the inside of the panel or wire hung glass. Ironwork shall be constructed of at least 1/8" material of 2" mesh. d) The front exterior doors shall have an interviewer or peepholes. e) Exterior and interior garage out-swinging doors shall have non- removable, hidden or non-accessible hinge pins. f) In-swinging exterior doors shall have rabbited jambs or alternate means of strengthening. g) The strike shall be attached to the jamb and door framm so as to prevent its being dislodged by the force of prying, blows or similar attack. h) Sliding glass doors: All sliding glass doors shall be equipped with a locking device that shall engage the strike sufficiently to prevent its being disengaged by any possible movement of the door within the space or clearances provided for installation and operation. The bolt and strike shall be reinforced by hardened material so as to prevent their separation by pulling, prying or similar attack. The locking device function may be operable by a keyed lock on the outside and shall be operable by a turn piece on the inside. Double sliding glass doors shall be locked at the meeting rail. II. WINDOWS a) Windows shall be so constructed that when the window is locked it cannot be lifted fran the frame. b) Louvered windows shall not be used within eight feet of ground level, adjacent stairways, or other structures. n III. STREET NUMBERS a) The street numbers shall be 3" high of standard design, black material mounted on an opaque light box which is to be lighted at all times. The street numbers shall be located on the structure at a height and location designated by the enforcing agency. IV. MULTIPLE DWELLINGS a) All multiple residential dwelling units shall comply with all residential security requirements. b) A sign directory displaying the numbers and location of all dwelling units in a diagram manner shall be posted at each vehicular entrance and main pedestrian entrance to the property in a location and of a size easily readable fran entering vehicles. The directory shall incliule annunciation as required by the Fire Department. I � 8 . LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS TO BE UTILIZED IN THE PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT I • • Page I The objectives, principles and standards that follow arc intended to guide tit:: applicant in the preparation of the Land Use and Devc•lopwo: t Plan and they will be used as the basis of the evaluation of the Land U.c and Development Plan by technical agencies, the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. The Objectives may be thought of as the primary social, economic and physical goals of the District to which the Land Use and Development Plan should be aimed. The Principles set forth the manner in which the land should be developed to achieve the objectives The Standards are considered to be measures that will assure realization of the objectives and principles; an alternate standard may be utilized if it is demonstrated that it is as effective as the listed standard. 'OBJECTIVES The Planned Development District and the provisions of this resolution, are established to encourage the arrangement of a variety of residential uses on suitable lands in such a manner that the resulting development will: a. be in accord with the General Plan of the County of Alameda; b. provide efficient use of the land that includes preservation of significant open areas and natural and topographic landscape features; c. provide an environment that will encourage the use of common open areas for community activities and other amenities; d, provide variety in the siting of varied housing types and in the design of access and circulation facilities; • a. be compatible with and enhance the development of the general area. PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS I. COMMON OPEN AREA DESIGN A. Principles: I. Common Open Area (all lands not utilized by Building Sites, the building and its required yards, private outdoor living areas, roads, school sites, and other land areas owned or maintained by a governmental agency) s%ould be: a) Designed as an essential or major element of the development; b) Located to take advantage of and help preserve existing natural amenities such as trees, topographic features, waterways and views; C) Consolidated generally into large useable areas; but used also to buffer incompatible uses and provide corridors of space around and within developed areas to achieve a spacious character and convenient linkage to all parts of the development. 2. Useable Common Doan Areas (that portion of Common Open Areas that meets criteria (1, 8, 1 for outdoor living) should be': a) Conveniently located For use by all the residents, but primarily distributed so that the largest and most useable areas are in closest proximity to highest density - highest intensity portions of the development; b) Adequate in size and configuration to accommodate a wide range of recreational activities whether soecific recreational areas or facilities arc provided initially or in the future. -1 . Page 2 3. Rccrcational Areas should be: a) Designed to provide for a wide range of recreational erpericnc.s, both passive and active. The extent and nature of specific improvements such as pools, play fields, court games, tot areas, sitting areas, and nature trails should be related to the c;uncral recreation needs of the residents, site characteristics and the availability of area-wide recreational facilities; b) Provided most generously where high-density--high intensity levels of development result in the limited availability of private outdoor spaces; c) Conveniently located without impairing the view and privacy of individual dwellings; d) Safe to use, durable, and economical to maintain. 4. The common open area and recreational facilities should be Preserved in perpetuity, and that the residents will share the advantages of using it and the responsibilities of maintaining it, B. Standards: 1. All common open areas and recreational facilities shall be owned by a Homeowners Association capable of desolution by 100% of its membership. 2. Useable common open areas shall be: a) Provided at the ratio of 500 sq. ft, per dwelling unit. This requirement may be reduced by 100 sq. ft. for each 500 sq. ft. of Private Outdoor Living Arca provided a dwelling unit in excess of that otherwise required by this Resolution (1184), b) Consolidated in units of at least 10,000 sq. ft. in area that measure not less than 100 feet in width or depth and shall not exceed a maximum gradient of 10%. . 3. All dwelling units shall be a minimum of 50 feet from the perimeter of all recreation areas and facilities subject to intensive use. II, BUILDING SITE DESIGN A. Principles: I. Dwelling concentrations of differing densities should be arranged that in general the highest density portions of the development are closest to existing and anticipated centers of activity, major transporation routes, commercial areas and other public facilities. 2, Dwelling units should be situated: a) In locations which are not subject to the probability of natural or man-made dangers, annoyances or inconveniences; b) To permit optimum Site utilization commensurate with the conservation of desirable topographic features; c) In compatible groups of similar building types; d) To take advantage of desirable views; e) To provide natural light and ventilation, adequate privacy and convenient access to and around each building; f) To assure their harmonious ,elatinnship with existing and anticipated development along peripheral boundaries. 'Page 3 3. Spaces should vary between building in accordance with the building size and use in order to achieve a desirable visual and social relationship. 4. The distance between buildings and streets should vary according to building size, use and character of street traffic in order to provide well planned streetscepc and to assure protection from traffic noise, congestion and property damage. 5. Private outdoor living areas for each dwelling unit shall be ample in size, useable in shape and adjacent to the dwelling units served. B. Standards: 1. A minimum five (5) foot yard shall be provided adjacent to each exterior building wall. This yard shall be increased: a) Five (5) feet for each story of the building wall over one story; and b) Two (2) feet for the first fifty (50) feet of building wall length, plus one (1) foot for every 10 feet of building wall length over 50''eet; and c) Five (5) feet from a limited access street (less than 300 vehicle trips per day); •d) Ten (10) feet for a minor residential street (300 to 600 vehicle trips per day; e) Twenty (20) feet from a neighborhood collector street (600 to 2,000 vehicle trips per day); f) Thirty (30) feet from an arterial (over 2,000 vehicle trips per day); (No yard required a building shall be used to satisfy the yard requirement of another building.) 2. Peripheral setbacks for a building located along the boundaries of the Planned Development site shall be equal to the required yard for that building but not less than 20 feet; 3. Private outdoor living areas shall be: a) At least 500 useable sq. ft. in area and measure not less than 15' in width or depth for single occupancy, detached buildings located on the ground floor; b) At least 300 useable sq. ft. In area and measure not less than 15' in width or depth for multiple occupancy attached dwellings located on the ground floor; Page 4 ' c. At least 70 useable sq. ft. In area and measure not less than 8' In width or depth for dwellings located above the ground floor. III. DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS FOR RPD ACCESS WAYS A. Purpose: These principles and standards are to be employed In the design, evaluation and approval of access ways in Residential Planned Development District (RPD) Lend Use and Development Plans. B. Definition of Access Way For the purpose of these principles and standards "access way"means those areas in an RPD intended for the circulation and maneuvering of motor vehicles where Design Hourly Volume (DHV) does not exceed 100. "Access way" Includes accesses to open and covered parking spaces, but not the spaces themselves. C. General Principle - Functional Design: Access ways should be designed to meet the specific conditions present in each development and be integrated with all other elements of the site plan. As local conditions and desired residential characteristics vary, so should access way function and design. The major determinants of RPD access way design are: I. Desired speed of movement: Generally there will be no need for fast movement of vehicles within the residential portions of Residential Planned Developments, speed and efficiency of movement being of sore Importance on collector and arterial streets leading to and through the development. Maintaining speeds within a range of from 5-15 mph within the residential portions generally will be desired in the interest of safety and residential compatibility. Exceptions where speeds to 25 mph will be desired may occur In very large or strung out develop- ments where more than 4 minutes travel time (1 mile at 15 mph) on a given access way required to reach the collector or arterial street providing access to and through the development. 2. Volume of traffic: Volume of traffic WV) should determine the number of moving lanes and intersection design, including parking bay access, and in combination with design speeds, the width of travel lanes. j. Type of vehicles served: Travel lane widths should be greater than required for automobiles alone where large service and emergency vehicles must be acconnodated. 4. Accommodation of utilities: Wherever necessary, the roadway area should be designed to accommodate water, sewer, electric, telephone, gas and drainage facilities. 5. Maintenance: The access way should be designed structurally for the base to last the life of the RPD and the surface to last at least ten years without significant repairs. Routine and major maintenance should be provided for either through the incorporation into the County Road System or by the Homes Association. Streets intended to serve traffic needs of an area beyond the RPD and collector or arterial streets within the RPD should be County maintained. 6. Safety and residential compatibility: Access ways should be designed to: a. Provide convenient access while minimizing dangers and annoyance. h. Avoid adverse grading and drainage conditions and conserve existing amenities of the site. .page 5 c. Minimize through traffic. 7. Needs of surrounding areas: Provide for general circulation needs of the surrounding area by providing connections to the existing street system and stub streets to undeveloped lands, which streets should be county maintained. D. Standards: I. Access way width: Access way width is to be determined by adding to the basic travel lane width other elements of the cross section that may be necessary for a given design situation, l.e., areas for parking, side- walks, landscaping, utilities, protective slopes, etc. 2. Travel lane width: Speed Range Traffic Volume Minimum (DHV)1 Lane Width 10 - 15 mph 0 - 50 9'2 15 - 25 mph 50 - 100 10' ZDesign Hourly Volume A minimum 10' width including shoulders is necessary if service and emergency vehicles will use. 3. Grades: Grades should not exceed 12% for portions of access ways likely to be used by school huses. Access ways may have short runs exceeding 127, but not greater than 15% or not greater than 20% if the access way is no more than 300 ft. in length. 4. Horizontal Curves: Speed Range, mph Lane Centerline Radius 10 - 15 mph 30'1 15 - 25 mph 50' 25 - mph NA 1 Where emergency vehicle service necessary 40' minimum; right angle turns 20' minimum 5. Turn around facilities: Maneuvering space for vehicle turnaround should be provided at the ends of dead-end access ways and at 500' intervals along access ways where intersections are non-existent or 1000' or more apart. 6. Parking: Parking spaces as required to service the resident and guest needs of the development may be located in lanes adjacent to access way':, traffic lanes, in bays off the access way, in conventional garage and parking structures or in various combinations as appropriate for the particular RPD design concept. Parking lane parallel to traffic lane: Design Speed Parking Lane Width 0 - 15 mph 8' 15 - 25 mph 9' • Page 6 Parking in bays perpendicular to and adjoining travel lane: Speed Range of DHV Stall Back up Travel Lane Width/Depth (includes travel lane area) 0 - 15 mph 0 - 20 9' - 20' 25' minimum 20 - 50_ 9' - 20' 28' minimum 15 - 25 mph Perpendicular Parking Not Permitted 7. Sidewalks and bicycle ways should be provided at locations within the RPD consistent with the need to service pedestrian and bicycle traffic likely to be generated. These facilities, depending on local conditions, may be a part of the vehicle travel way, located adjacent to it or in an entirely separate area. When associated with the access way, the following standards shall apply: Speed Range Traffic Volume Sidewalks Bicycle Ways (mph) (DHV) 0 - 15 0 - 70 Part of travel way Part of travel way except when high pedestrian volume anticipated 20 - 50 4' wide, adjoining Part of travel way 15 - 25 0 - 50 4' wide, adjoining Part of travel way 50 - 100 4' wide, separated 10' wide adjoining by parkstrip roadway (Park strip is 2' wide except where additional width is required for landscaping. 8. Curbs and gutters, shoulders slope and utility easements: Should he provided and included as part of the access way as warranted by traffic, drainage, topographic, soils and road structural conditions. 9. Access way structural section: Access way structural section should consist of a minimum 0.2' asphalt concrete pavement on a 0.5' aggregate base, or greater if determined necessary by base soil analysis. C. Illustrations of standards: Following examples are of some typical access way cross sections that may occur in RPD's through use of the preceding principles and standards. Ie'TOTAL W IafM 05' f---- -- -- Q5' 9' g' 1 «+ I t a (fig • • . Minimum 10 - 15 mph speed range and traffic volume 0 - 50 DHV . No provision for emergency or service vehicles necessary • Parking and pedestrian movement accommodated elsewhere . Curbs for drainage and protection of street edge and adjoining landscaping Page 7 38.5'1.C7T7,L WIDTH 3 lo' k lo' 9' 25 41 I `< I . 15 - 75 speed and 50 - 100 DHV • Parking one side • Sidewalk one side . (I'.U.E. varies) 46,5'TOT.A_ wIDfm —0.5 I to' lot et 20 Curb III .1111Mkir �— _sk a thL$ • . 0 - 15 mph speed and 20 - 50 DHV traffic • Parking at right angles in bay open to access way b¢'TaTM• WIDTH • _- Id >4 2.5,_pi._�to'-�+` 10' 9' )2,5 4� ,C�arlas 2 31 u I11.II ea 4 . Speed to 25 mph, traffic 50 - I00 DHV Parking both sides . Sidewalks both sides and separated by parkstrip . Bicycle way provided, separated by planter strip • Slope easement one side (varies) Page 8 IV. DESIGN OF PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION SYSTEMS A. Principles: Pedestrian ways should be: 1. Designed to provide for safe and convenient circulation within and beyond the development; special attention should be given to the connections between parking areas, dwelling units and all project facilities; 2. Designed and improved in accordance with their intended use (I.e., nature trails, entry walks, and street.sidewalks or equivalent); 3. Of proper width, alignment and gradient to provide safety, convenience and appearance suitable for pedestrian traffic; 4, Designed, located, and improved to protect privacy of Individual dwellings. B. Standards: The walking distance from a dwelling unit to the required parking space or spaces which serve It shall not exceed 200' as measured along defined walkways; walking distance from dwelling units to guest parking spaces shall not exceed 500' as measured along defined walkways. V. SITE IMPROVEMENTS: GRADING, DRAINAGE. INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES, USE OF PLANT MATERIALS AND OTHER OUTDOOR FACILITIES A. Principles: 1. Grading. Grading shall be designed to assure stable ground forms, adequate surface drainage, safe and convenient access to and around the buildings and to conserve desirable existing vegetation and natural ground forms. Any unusual hazard to pedestrians created by slopes or sudden grade changes shall be minimized by the installation of fences, walls, rails, or planting. 2. Drainage. Installation of adequate facilities for the collection and disposal of storm waters shall be provided to prevent damage to property and to provide for the safety and convenience of occupants. 3. All utility Installations Installed In and for the purpose of supplying service to the development shall be underground. 4. The appeal and character of the site should be preserved and enhanced by retaining and protecting existing trees and other site features to the extent that they enhance the project and additional new plant materials should be added for privacy, shade, erosion control and to screen out objectionable features. 5. Appropriately designed fences, walks, or planting should be Installed along property boundary lines, parking areas, playgrounds, laundry yard, refuse collection points, and other locations where needed for protection or screening purposes. Plant materials should be selected and arranged to produce a harmonious visual effect. 6. Laundry and drying facilities of appropriate size should be provided when necessary at locations readily accessible to the dwelling units. 7. Refuse collection stations should be located convenient to both the residents and collectors and suitably screened. 8. Light fixtures for walks, steps, parking areas, driveway, streets and other facilities should be provided to assure safe and convenient night time use. Fixtures should be designed in keeping with the project and properly shaded to screen dwelling unit windows from the direct rays of light. 9. GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OR CONVERSION OF CONDOMINIUM,COMMUNITY APARTMENT AND STOCK COOPERATIVE RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS Adopted by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors May 15,1979 The following guidelines ore adopted for use in Planning Deportment actions on Tentative Subdivision Maps,Site Development Review and Planned District rezoning applications involving either the new construction of, or conversion of existing dwellings to,condominium community apartment and stock cooperative dwellings. By using these guidelines together with existing General Plan policies and regulatory ordinances it is the Planning Commission's objective to: . Promote the generation of housing of enduring quality and the conservation of existing housing. . Assure residential living environments odequote to the needs of long- term occupancy. . Provide neighborhood stability. . Protect individual housing investments. . Help assure economic and efficient operation of condominium homes associations. . Address in condominium conversions needs of existing residents for alternate housing. GUIDELINES I. Floor area ratio: The ratio of total project residential floor area to project site area should not exceed 1:3. A greater floor area than 1:3, as determined on a case by case basis, may be appropriate for high density projects(normally exceeding 2500 square feet of site area per unit),where units are stocked and other design elements are introduced to increase openness and privacy and where special amenities,such as views,offset site deficiencies resulting from exceeding this ratio. On sites where existing construction takes up a disproportionate share of the site,the site areaffloor area ratio should apply only to the area remaining for development. 2. Parking: One of the two parking spaces per unit required by zoning should be located as close to living units os good design will permit; a separation of more than SO feet should be avoided. Where practical,enclosed parking spaces should have an opron in front capable of providing a tandem space for alternate or additional use. One space per unit should be covered. In addition Condominium Guidelines Page Two to the two spaces required to serve each unit,guest parking should be provided at I space per 2 units for units up to 1,000 square feet -- and I to I for larger units. Available on-street parking may be counted to meet this requirement. Signs should identify guest parking areas and the Covenonts, Conditions and Restrictions should prohibit the use of these areas by homeowner families. Parking may be reduced below this level if the project is in an orea with a public tronsit system considered adequate to serve the needs of the residents or may be reduced to be consistent with a Specific Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors. 3. Private open areas: Each ground floor unit should hove a private open area properly related to the floor plan and at least 300 square feet in area,with a minimum dimension of 15 feet. Units not on the ground floor should have adequate balconies with o minimum dimension of 8 feet. 4. Private entrances: Unit entrances should be designed as a transition to the living areas and should be semi-private,with no more than two together on any floor and not be via balconies post other units. Building walls at entry areas should be separated at least 12 feet from parking and driveways and special attention should be given to the landscaping in the intervening area. 5. Unit orientation: Dwelling units should be sited and screened to provide privacy from adjacent units and uses(including those on adjacent property),from vehicular and service functions and from group activity areas. 6. Landscaping: Project landscaping should be considered a vital part of the overall development and should be designed by a registered Landscape Architect. Special treatment should be required in and around major parking areas for screening and for reducing the visual impact of the paving. 7. Noise: Common walls and ceilings of all units should be constructed using techniques to limit noise transmission as specified by the current Building Code except where Code testsstandards can be performed din each demonstrated eunita Ve been met on the basis of by a Professional Engineer specializing in acoustical engineering. 8. Smoke detectors: Smoke detectors should be Installed in each residential unit and in meeting and recreation rooms owned in common as required by the Current Building Code. 9. Energy conservation: Energy conservation insulation should be •Installed in all project buildings in accordance with hTitl thereof.24rtate of California Administrative Code,or any changes • ' Condominium Guidelines Page Three 10. Physical condition of housing to be converted to condominiums: the project as a whole should be in good repair when offered for sale. Prior to filing a final mop permitting condominium sales, the following reports should be submitted for review and approval - by the Director of Public Works: (a) A report by a licensed roofing contractor certifying that the roofs of all the structures ore in good condition and not likely to be in need of replacement for at least 10 years. (b) A report by a Professional Engineer attesting that the structure of all buildings, pavements, storm drainage facilities and the interior and exterior plumbing,electrical systems and utility and mechanical equipment to be owned in common or as part of individual condominiums are in good and serviceable condition; (c) A report by a licensed painting contractor certifying that pointing throughout the project is in good condition and that the building exteriors should not require repainting for at least five years. (d) A report by a licensed termite and pest control specialist certifying that the structures ore free of infestation and structural damage caused by pests. (e) Deadbolts(flush mounted variety with I""throw"into the jamb)should be installed in entry doors of all units. Deadbolts(flush mounted variety with I""throw"into the jamb) should be installed in entry doors of all units. 11. Domestic facilities: Adequate facilities at appropriate locations should be provided for domestic needs including laundry facilities, screened garbage collection facilities,and special storage areas (100 cubic ft.min.),for each unit. Provision for laundry facilities should be included in each unit,where possible;but,in any cote, at least one washer and one dryer should be provided for every four dwellings. Appliances in converted apartment units should,if not new, be warranted to new values. 12. Utilities: (It is the intent of the following guidelines to secure public maintenance of as much as is feasible of the utility systems installed on project common open areas. In conversions where such systems are privately maintained reconstruction of the system may be necessary to meet requirements of the servicing entity.) On-site sewer and water systems(except laterals to individual • units or buildings, plumbing within buildings, and landscaping irrigation systems)and fire hydrants should be maintained by the Condominium Guidelines • Page Four Systems should be designed to minimize the length of laterals and to locate meters next to the buildings served. A separate water meter should be provided for each residence or at least each building. Master metering of gas and electric service is not permitted. Separate metering of gas and electric service to each individual dwelling unit will be made in occordance with the .serving utilities' tariffs. Water supply systems for fire fighting should meet the requirements of the fire district and be connected to the public water supply system; keys to security gates and doors should be kept in key boxes at locations approved by the Fire Chief. The key box and key should be designed to district specifications. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions should provide that upon sufficient notice to homeowners,the serving utilities be authorized to enter any portions of the units whenever restoration of gas, electric and telephone service is required; that the utilities shall have the right to install,move, remove, or run new lines in or on any portions of the common area, including the interior and exterior of the units(except where undergrounding is required by the Subdivision Ordinance)as is necessary to maintain telephone service within the subdivision, and that this provision may not be amended or terminated without the consent of the uillities. In conversion, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company should be responsible for maintaining the existing underground telephone conduit distribution system serving the buildings. 13. Play areas: Play areas with play equipment should be provided in all projects likely to have children at locations where surveillance is practical and noise con be tolerated. Play area size should be determined on the basis of 40 sq.ft.per child. 14. In considering applications for condominium conversions, preference will be given proposals whereunder: o. Renters over the oge of 65, or who have children under 12 years of age, or who hove serious physical handicaps, or renters who for other reasons are likely to have great difficulty relocating, are to be offered four year leases at current rents with provision for limiting rent increases to not more than 7%annually. b. Apartment buildings over 15 years old will be brought into substantial conformance with present Building Code standards. c. Moving expenses to a maximum of $500 are to be provided to renters displaced by the conversion. • Condominium Guidelines Page Five 15. Rents for tenants residing for at least a full year in a project considered for conversion shall not have been increased more than the increase in the Cans, -r's Price Index for that period. No rent increases shall be permitted during the period in which the application is being processed by the County. 16. Tentative map applications for condominium conversions should be accompanied by a survey of comparable rental housing in the area surrounding the proposed-conversion. This survey is to be used to evaluate the impact of the conversion on tenants who will be displaced. The boundary of the survey area should be determined in consultation with the Planning Department staff. The survey should include identification of all rental housing in structures of two or more units and the following information regarding eoch development: (a) Number of units, categorized by bedroom count and rents charged; (b) Vacancies by unit type; (c) Policy on renting to families with children. The application should also include ony proposals by the subdivider for offering leases to existing renters, for bringing apartment buildings over 15 years old up to current Building Code standards, for paying moving expenses of renters that will be displaced by the conversion, and evidence that rents during the post year conform with the limitations of provision.15. 17. A copy of the proposed application for the Department of Real Estate Public Report should be submitted with the application for tentative map approval. . . KS. • • 46- . • Nv, • • • • 71-0" . . •mir-1, _ • . . . • • _...„. . . . • . . . . • - . • • •••, •••7Z. ••-•4•Ii.,!•!...• : ••• • •• •••.• • ' • -,. • • • • -•• •"•• t• • •• • k_StVirii•110-eLl...4A4-• -2,-.• TTAcHmENT 6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP 5962 CONCERNING PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON WHEREAS, the Paragon Group has requested approval of a Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map, and Annexation of 196+ acres to allow 17 single family lots on approximately 10 acres and 300 multi family units on 16+ acres, approximately 10+ acres of open space, in unincorporated Alameda County, west of Silvergate Drive, north of the western terminus of Dublin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the State of California Subdivision Map Act and the adopted City of Dublin Subdivision Regulations require that no real property may be divided into two or more parcels for purpose of sale, lease or financing unless a tentative map is acted upon, and a final map is approved consistent with the Subdivision Map Act and City of Dublin subdivision regulations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings to consider the request on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper public notice of this request was given in all respects as required by law for the Planning Commission hearings; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Tentative Map subject to conditions prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard and considered all said reports, recommendations and written and oral testimony submitted at the public hearing as herein above set forth; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State law (CEQA) and regulations, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby find that: 1. Tentative Map 5962, as modified, is consistent with the intent of applicable subdivision regulations and City zoning and related ordinances. 2. Tentative Map 5962, as modified, is consistent with the City's General Plan as they apply to the subject property. 3. Tentative Map 5962 will not result in the creation of significant environmental impacts. 4. Tentative Map 5962 will not have substantial adverse effects on health or safety or be substantially T-MA-17 171485-a 5 Dan(.06,4 Gttvieo detrimental to the public welfare, or be injurious to property or public improvements. 5. The site is physically suitable for the proposed development in that the site is indicated to be geologically satisfactory for the type of development proposed in locations as shown, provided the geological consultant's recommendations are followed; and the site is in a good location regarding public services and facilities. 6. The request is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area, will not overburden public services, and will facilitate the provision of housing of a type and cost that is desired, in the City of Dublin. 7. General site considerations, including unit layout, open space, topography, orientation and the location of future buildings, vehicular access, circulation and parking, setbacks and similar elements have been designated to provide a desirable environment for the development. 8. This project will not cause serious public health problems in that all necessary utilities are, or will be, required to be available and Zoning, Building and Subdivision Ordinances control the type of development and the operation of the uses to prevent health problems after development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission hereby recommends City Council approval of Tentative Map 5962 - PA89-125 Donlan Canyon - subject to the conditions listed below. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Unless otherwise specified, the following conditions shall be complied with prior to the recordation of the Final Map. Each item is subject to review and approval by the Planning Department and Public Works Department unless otherwise specified. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. This approval is for Tentative Map 5962, PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon. The Final Map shall generally conform to the Tentative Map prepared by Aliquot dated received May 24, 1990 labeled Exhibit A on file with the Dublin Planning Department. 2. Approval of Tentative Map is subject to the subdivider/developer securing final approval from the Dublin City Council for the Planned Development (PD) Prezoning request covering the subject property. Any modifications to the project design approved by the Planned Development (PD) Prezoning action shall supersede the design on the Tentative Map and shall be considered as an -2- eiN approved modification on the Tentative Map. Site Development Review approval for the project shall be secured prior to the recordation of the Final Map. Site Development Review and Final Map recordation may occur in phases. 3. Comply with the "Typical Public Works Conditions of Approval for Subdivisions" (see Attachment 1). 4. The Developer shall comply with applicable Fire Department, Flood Control District, and Public Works requirements. Written statements from each such agency or department approving the plans over which it has jurisdiction shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits on lots of the subdivision or the installation of any improvements related to this project. 5. Should the developer wish to file a master Tract Map separating or phasing the project, all off-site work shall be guaranteed and constructed as part of the agreement for this tract. In addition, all streets necessary to keep from landlocking any parcel shall be offered for dedication and the construction guaranteed by the Subdivision Agreement. All off-site improvements and contributions to off-site improvements and offer of dedication of open space shall occur in conjunction with phase 1. Except that contribution to improvements of Valley Christian Center Road shall occur in conjunction with the single family phase. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS 6. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be established for this development. The CC&R's shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 7. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City to assure that: a. There is adequate provision for at least the maintenance, in good repair, of all commonly owned facilities, property and landscaping, including but not limited to open space areas, lighting, recreation facilities, landscape and irrigation facilities, fencing, and drainage and erosion control improvements. b. Payment of dues and assessments shall be both a lien against the assessed land and a personal obligation of each property owner. An estimate of these costs shall be provided to each buyer prior to the time of purchase. c. The Association shall keep the City Planning Department informed of the current name, address and phone number of the Association's official representative. d. Payment of the water and street lighting bills (maintenance and energy) and maintenance and repair of storm drain lines, are the obligations of the Homeowner's Association, unless -3- .—• paid for through a Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Assessment District. e. Each buyer is to sign an acknowledgement that he has read the Constitution and Bylaws of the Homeowner's Association and the Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions applying to the development. f. The Homeowner's Association shall contract with, or be advised (as in handling maintenance operations) by, a professional management firm. g. The CC&R's shall include a statement outlining the obligations of the property owner to be responsible for public liability in case of injury in connection with public utility easements, and for maintenance of private vehicle access ways and utility trenches in public utility easements. h. The CC&R's shall contain a list of plant materials acceptable for landscaping subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and Fire Department. GRADING AND DRAINAGE 8. Landslides and erosive areas as outlined in the Geotechnical Investigation Report for Donlan Canyon Ranch project shall be shown on the Grading and Improvement Plans. Proposed repairs shall be outlined on these same plans. 9. Long term maintenance of these landslide repairs landslides within the developed area shall be the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association/property owner and incorporated in the CC&R's. 10. Prior to approval of grading plans, Applicant shall conform to the recommendations outlined in the Geotechnical Investigation Report for Donlan Canyon project as a minimum. Stricter controls, particularly on landslide repairs, retaining structures, subdrains, and surface drainage, may be imposed by the Public Works Director. 11. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the City shall contract for a third party soils engineer to review and provide recommendation of the Applicant's submitted Geotechnical Investigation Report as related to landslide repair. The Applicant/Developer shall pay the City the cost of the third party review. 12. All concentrated storm drain flow shall be discharged into the established drainage channels, not onto the slopes. 13. All inlets and outlets of storm drain flow from or into natural drainage channels shall be constructed with rock slope protection to eliminate erosion and undercutting. -4- /'1 14. A registered civil engineer shall design all retaining walls over three feet in height (or over two feet in height with a surcharge) and a building permit shall be required for their construction. A maintenance/ inspection program shall be implemented by the developer/homeowners' association for the periodic inspection and maintenance of all retaining walls that could possibly affect the public right-of-way. All wood in contact with soil shall be pressure treated. 15. Each lot that drains to the street shall be provided with two 3" drains through the curbs and the roof leaders shall be tied into them. 16. No drainage shall be directed over a slope. 17. All cut and fill slopes shall be contoured to appear natural and blend with the existing natural contours. 18. The soils report for the project shall include recommendations 1) for foundations, decks, and other miscellaneous structures, 2) for design of swimming pools, and 3) for setbacks for structures from top or toes of slopes. Additionally, the soils report shall include a professional opinion as to safety of the site from the hazards of land slippage, erosion, settlement and seismic activity. 19. A declaration by the soils engineer that she/he has supervised grading and that such conformance has occurred shall be submitted to the Public Works Director. 20. Prior to final preparation of the subgrade and placement of base materials, all underground utilities shall be installed and service connections stubbed out behind the sidewalk. Public utilities, Cable TV, sanitary sewers, and water lines will be installed in a manner which will not disturb the street pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk when future service connections or extensions are made. 21. Grading shall be completed in compliance with the construction grading plans and recommendations of the project's soils engineer and/or engineering geologist, and the approved erosion and sedimentation control plan, and shall be done under the supervision of the project's soils engineer and/or engineering geologist, who shall, upon its completion, submit a declaration to the Public Works Director that all work was done in accordance with the recommendations contained in the soils and geologic investigation reports and the approved plans and specifications. Inspections that will satisfy grading plan requirements shall be arranged with the Public Works Director. 22. Any grading on adjacent properties will require written approval of those property owners affected. 23. Where soil or geologic conditions encountered in grading operations are different from that anticipated in the soil and -5- geologic investigation report, or where such conditions warrant changes to the recommendations contained in the original soil investigation, a revised soil or geologic report shall be submitted for review by the Public Works Director. It shall be accompanied by an engineering and geological opinion as to the safety of the site from hazards of land slippage, erosion, settlement and seismic activity. 24. All cut and fill slopes shall be revegetated with native shrubs, trees and grasses subject to review and approval of the Planning Director and Public Works Director. 25. Prior to Tentative Map approval, the Applicant shall submit a drainage plan/hydrology report. This report shall prove adequacy and/or propose necessary improvements to the downstream drainage facilities. These facilities shall be adequate to convey the 100 year storm flow. 26. Landslides and erosive areas as outlined in the Geotechnical Investigation Report for Donlan Canyon shall be shown on the Improvement/Grading Plans. Proposed repairs shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association and incorporated in the CC&R's. 27. The grading shall meet the requirements set forth in the preliminary geotechnical exploration, and ultimately, the final geotechnical exploration. Including all required subdrains, buttress fills, over-excavation and recompaction, keyed and benched engineering fills, and all other specifications. 28. In the past, grading of other hills in this area has activated natural springs. These springs can contain numerous chemicals, including H2S, which discharges a displeasing odor. Moreover, this spring water has been found to leave a hard residue that may plug up subdrains and the storm drain system, rendering them ineffective. It is likely that the proposed grading of this site will cause additional springs to surface. The Applicant shall submit a detailed study of this problem for review and approval of the Public Works Director to determine how these springs should be handled in order to prevent any damage to the environment, as well as to public and private facilities. 29. Show typical lot drainage on the subdivision grading plans. 30. The Applicant shall submit an erosion control plan that conforms to the "ABAG Control and Sedimentation Handbook" as a minimum. 31. The improvement plans shall include construction details for all drainage inlets and manholes that are not Alameda County Standard. 32. No retention basin will be permitted. Detention basin with 100 year spillway tied into underground drain is required subject to Public Works Director approval. All through underground storm -6- n n drain systems will be adequately constructed to collect and convey the 100 year storm flow. 33. Grading plans shall state the quantity of fill that must be on or off hauled. If fill is to be on or off hauled the Applicant shall submit details as to how it will be done and routes of travel for the Public Works Director's approval. 34. The two drainage inlets at the west end of Donlan Canyon shall be constructed with at least two sets of trash racks each. The Applicant shall provide details of the trash racks on the Improvement Plans. 35. The Applicant shall provide trash racks and all weather access where picking up natural drainage meets improved storm drain system, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 36. All storm drain pipes that drain public property or the open space shall be contained within storm drain easements and shall be constructed of reinforced concrete pipe. 37. All slopes 10 feet in height or higher will have a concrete "v' ditch installed at the toe of the slope. These ditches shall discharge into natural drainage channels or adequate storm drain systems. 38. The old undocumented fill in Donlan Canyon shall be removed and recompacted in a controlled and monitored manner. All unsuitable material found in this fill shall be removed and not reused in the fill subject to the Building Official and Public Works Director approval. 39. Subdrains shall be installed in all existing water channels that the Applicant is proposing to fill. Including the existing creek, and swales. In addition a subdrain will be installed along both sides of Donlan Canyon at the existing toe of bank. All subdrains will be 6" minimum in diameter and will have cleanouts at a minimum of every 300 linear feet. No single angles shall exist in the subdrain or cleanout riser grater than 22.5 degrees subject to Public Works Director review and approval. 40. The Developer shall provide an all weather surface access to the existing ranch road located northwest of the multi-family project site subject to Site Development Review and Public Works Director approval. STREETS 41. All public streets shall drain into storm drain systems before being discharged into established drainage channels. 42. An encroachment permit shall be secured from the Public Works Director for any work done within the public right-of-way where this work is not covered under the improvement plans. -7- 43. Street names shall be submitted and processed through the Planning Department and shall be indicated on the Final Map and Improvement Plans. 44. The Developer shall furnish and install street name signs, in accordance with the standards of the City of Dublin, bearing such names as are approved by the Planning Director. The subdivider shall furnish and install traffic safety signs in accordance with the standards of the City of Dublin. 45. The entrance road through Parcel "C" shall have no more than a 6% slope for the first 100 feet to allow for the possible future widening on Dublin Boulevard in this area. 46. Maximum longitudinal slope on any streets shall not exceed 12%. 47. Maximum longitudinal slopes through intersections shall not exceed 6%. 48. Driveway slopes shall not exceed 20%. 49. All concentrated surface flow shall be contained within a improved ditch to eliminate soil erosion. 50. All public streets and cul-de-sacs shall conform to Alameda County Standards. 51. The Applicant shall coordinate with the Applicant of the Hansen Hills project to insure that "A" Street conforms to both projects and the City of Dublin standards. OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS 52. Prior to approval of the improvement plans and Final Map the developer shall submit documents satisfactory to the City of Dublin presenting proof of public access on the proposed road across Parcel "C". 53. Construct 35 foot radius cul-de-sac at the end of Dublin Boulevard. The new curb and gutter shall not be constructed any closer to Interstate 580 than the existing curb. 54. Provide a 2" AC overlay on Dublin Boulevard in front of the Donlan Canyon project. The overlay shall include placing paving fabric between the existing pavement and the overlay. 55. Remove the existing AC berm on the north side of Dublin Boulevard from the proposed turnaround to Silvergate Drive and replace with Alameda County Standard Curb, Gutter and 5 foot wide sidewalk. 56. The Applicant shall obtain Caltrans approval for any work performed within their right-of-way, or affecting their facilities (i.e., tying into their cross-culvert, etc.). -8- 57. Prior to release of occupancy of any units, the developer shall be responsible for contribution towards cost of the design, construction and inspection of an additional right-turn lane including right-of-way and related signal modification in the west leg of eastbound Dublin Boulevard at the San Ramon Road intersection. This cost shall be split between this development and the development of the Hansen Hills property immediately to the east, on a pro rata basis based on the amount of traffic generated by each development. 58. Prior to release of occupancy of any units, the developer shall be responsible for contribution towards cost of the design, construction and inspection of the widening of the existing roadway of Dublin Boulevard approximately 15 feet, all on the south side, between Silvergate Drive and Hansen Drive, to accommodate four 12-foot traffic lanes, and two five-foot bike lanes, and a five-foot sidewalk, as generally shown on the proposed widening plans prepared by TJKM and dated received August of 1988 and described in the study prepared by TJKM in memo dated September 27, 1989. This work shall also involve reconstructing the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Silvergate Drive to form a "T" intersection, with Dublin Boulevard being the through road. This cost shall be split between this development and the development of the Hansen Hills property immediately to the east on a pro rata basis based on the amount of traffic generated by each development. 59. The developer shall be responsible for paying his fair share towards the cost of the design, construction and inspection of the off-site street improvements through the Valley Christian Center based on proportionate traffic generation on that street. 60. Prior to release of building permits, the Applicant shall remove all downed wood and debris the on-site creeks to keep this material from entering the water courses. This pruning and removal shall be done in the area lying between the creeks and 50 feet uphill of the flow line. 61. A 10-foot public utility easement shall be shown on the Final Map along all street frontages, in addition to all other easements required by the utility companies or governmental agencies. 62. All common area landscaping, and landscaped medians, shall be maintained by the homeowners' association/or property owners of the multi-family project. 63. All open space shall be owned and maintained by the City of Dublin, if offered for dedication and accepted by the City, or another agency/land trust acceptable to the City of Dublin Planning Director and Public Works Director, if offered for dedication and accepted by such agency. 64. The Developer shall submit to the Public Works Department for review and approval, a street signing and striping plan. -9- 65. The Developer shall submit an acoustic analysis for the project. The study shall determine Interstate 580 affects on the proposed development and whether sound walls or other sound attenuations are necessary. If the study determines the sound walls are necessary, the Applicant shall submit plans and details subject to Site Development Review approval and construct them as part of their improvements. 66. If the Applicant is planning on selling the multi-family units as condominiums, the Tentative Map must say "For Condominium Purposes". UTILITIES 67. Electrical, gas, telephone, and Cable TV services, shall be provided underground to each lot or building in accordance with the City policies and existing ordinances. All utilities shall be located and provided within public utility easements, sized to meet utility company standards, or in public streets. 68. Prior to filing of the grading and improvement plans, the developer shall furnish the Public Works Director with a letter from Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) stating that DSRSD has agreed to furnish water and sewer service to the development. 69. Secure DSRSD agreement to maintain the on-site sanitary sewer collection system excluding individual laterals. The system shall be designed as acceptable to DSRSD. 70. All utilities along the projects Dublin Boulevard frontage and within the project shall be undergrounded. WATER 71. Water facilities must be connected to the DSRSD system, and must be installed at the expense of the developer, in accordance with District standards and specifications. All material and workmanship for water mains, and appurtenances thereto, must conform with all of the requirements of the officially adopted Water Code of the District, and will be subject to field inspection by the District. 72. Any water well, cathodic protection well, or exploratory boring shown on the map, that is known to exist, is proposed or is located during the course of field operations, must be properly destroyed, backfilled, or maintained in accordance with applicable groundwater protection ordinances. Zone 7 should be contacted for additional information. 73. The Developer/Applicant shall comply with all applicable DSRSD and City of Dublin Public Works requirements, particularly regarding: -10- a. The elevation of the storm drain relative to the sewer lines. b. The location of the sewer man-holes. They shall be in parking or street areas accessible by DSRSD's equipment. c. Dedication of sewer lines. d. Location and design of the water system valves. 74. The Applicant/Developer shall submit plans for all DSRSD facilities within the project to DSRSD for review and approval. 75. The Applicant/Developer shall submit a water system analysis showing pressures and elevations throughout the development, subject to DSRSD review and approval. 76. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant/ Developer shall submit to the City of Dublin Planning Director proof that DSRSD requirements have been met. IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AGREEMENTS AND SECURITY 77. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Dublin and its agents, officers, and employees, from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Dublin or its agents, officers, or employees, to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Dublin or its advisory agency, appeal board, or legislative body concerning a subdivision, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499.37 of the Government Code of the State of California. The City of Dublin shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action, or proceedings and shall cooperate fully in the defense. DEDICATIONS 78. Park land shall be dedicated or in-lieu fees shall be paid, or a combination of both shall be provided prior to issuance of building permits or prior to recordation of the Final Map, whichever occurs first, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance. The park land dedication required is approximately 2.887 acres (.011 acres per dwelling unit for single family portion of the site and .009 acres per dwelling unit for multi- family). OPEN SPACE/COMMON AREAS/LANDSCAPING 79. Maintenance of common areas including ornamental landscaping, graded slopes, erosion control plantings and drainage, erosion and sediment control improvements, retaining walls, and landslide repair improvements shall be the responsibility of the developer during construction stages, and until final improvements are accepted by the City, and the performance guarantee required is released; thereafter, maintenance shall be the responsibility of a Homeowner's Association, which automatically collects -11- maintenance assessments from each owner and makes the assessments a personal obligation of each owner and a lien against the assessed property. 80. Street trees, of at least a 15-gallon size, shall be planted along the street frontages. Trees shall be planted in accordance with a planting plan, including tree varieties and locations, approved by the Planning Director. Trees planted within, or adjacent to, sidewalks or curbs shall be provided with root shields. 81. Prior to issuance of grading permit visually important trees shall be tagged in the field for protection and preservation and appropriately fenced subject to approval of the Public Works Director. DEBRIS/DUST 82. Measures shall be taken to contain all trash, construction debris, and materials on-site until disposal off-site can be arranged. The developer shall be responsible for corrective measures at no expense to the City of Dublin. 83. The developer shall keep adjoining public streets and driveways free and clean of project dirt, mud, materials and debris, and clean-up shall be made during the construction period, as determined by the Public Works Director. 84. Areas undergoing grading and all other construction activities shall be watered or other dust-palliative measures used to prevent dust, as conditions warrant. ARCHAEOLOGY 85. If, during construction, archaeological remains are encountered, construction in the vicinity shall be halted, an archaeologist consulted, and the City Planning Department notified. If, in the opinion of the archaeologist, the remains are significant, measures, as may be required by the Planning Director, shall be taken to protect them. FIRE 86. All materials and workmanship for fire hydrants, gated connections, and appurtenances thereto, necessary to provide water supply for fire protection, must be installed by the developer and conform to all requirements of the applicable provisions specified by the Dougherty Regional Fire Authority (DRFA). All such work will be subject to the joint field inspection of the Public Works Director and DRFA. 87. The developer shall comply with all applicable requirements of DRFA including, but not limited to, those related to the following: -12- n n a. Fire Trail Access, b. Fire Buffer Zone, c. Weed Abatement, d. Fire Sprinklers in Structures outside the 1-1/2 mile distance from the nearest fire station, e. Street Grades, f. Fire Impact Fee, g. Fire Hydrants, and h. Roads MISCELLANEOUS 88. Any relocation of improvements or public facilities shall be accomplished at no expense to the City. 89. Copies of the project plans, indicating all lots, streets and drainage facilities, shall also be submitted at 1" = 400' scale, and 1" = 200' scale for City mapping purposes. 90. This property shall be annexed to the Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. 83-1. 91. All construction traffic may be subject to specific routing as determined by the Public Works Director. 92. The Developer shall provide unit address information to the satisfaction of DRFA, U.S. Postal Services, and City of Dublin Planning Department. 93. All construction/grading activity at the site shall be restricted to the hours between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except as may be approved in advance in writing by the Public Works Director. 94. In submitting subsequent plans for review and approval, each set of plans shall have attached an annotated copy of these conditions of approval. The notations shall clearly indicate how all conditions of approval will be complied with. Construction plans will not be accepted without the annotated conditions attached to each set of plans. The Applicant will be responsible for obtaining the approvals of all participating non-City agencies prior to the issuance of building permits. 95. The Applicant/Developer shall work with the Applicant/Developer of the adjacent property Hansen Hill/Bren Co. project site Tentative Map 5962 to provide adequate access and utility connections, to the satisfaction of Public Works Director. 96. Prior to issuance of grading plan the Applicant shall submit for review and approval a site safety plan for protection of construction worker. The Safety Plan shall establish action levels for personal protection identified through on-site air monitoring in compliance with Alameda County Environmental Health Services requirements. -13- 97 . Any materials escavated during construction and grading of the site which contain chemical compounds shall not be reused on-site unless acceptable remediation measures are complied with subject to Public Works Director approval . 98 . Temporary fencing shall be provided during construction for those areas of riparian or oak/bay woodland habitat not intended to be included in the construction or grading zones . 99 . For any removed trees with a trunk diameter greater than 6 inches at a height of 54 inches above ground, replacement trees should be planted on-site and be of a similar native species on a 3 to 1 basis . 100 . Replacement trees shall be at least a five gallon container stock size. The large trees which will be removed shall be replaced with bay trees at a size of at least ten gallon containers . A maintenance program shall be established for the replacement trees as necessary to provide fertilizer, pruning and protection from browsing by deer and rabbits . 101 . The creation of the new habitat corridor on Lot 1 as approved by the California Department of Fish and Game shall be undertaken prior to or at least concurrently with the project construction, and shall consist of the minimum habitat widths and vegetation types as preliminarily proposed. A contingency plan for replanting of the corridor shall be developed in case the original attempt fails . The new habitat corridor shall be inspected on an annual basis to determine if the original plantings are surviving and providing adequate wildlife habitat. If necessary, new plantings shall be installed and maintained in a manner consistent with the original plans . 102 . Prior to undertaking any fill activities within the channel of Donlan Canyon Creek or in adjacent wetlands, all necessary permits shall be obtained from the California Department of Fish and Game, and the US Army Corps of Engineers . All conditions of these permits shall be implemented including those attached to the Corps permit by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board through its issuance of State water quality certification. The Applicant shall submit verification that necessary permits have been obtained to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. AYES : NOES : ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -14- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECT CITY OF DUBLIN STAFF TO MAKE APPLICATION TO THE ALAMENDA COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) FOR APPROXIMATELY 196+ ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN INVOLVED IN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PREZONING REQUEST FILED UNDER PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON WHEREAS, the Paragon Group has requested approval of a Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map, and Annexation of 196+ acres to allow 17 single-family lots on approximately 10 acres and 300 multi-family units on 16+ acres approximately 170+ acres of open space, in unincorporated Alameda County, west of Silvergate Drive, north of the western terminus of Dublin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings to consider the request on June 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper public notice of this request was given in all respects as required by law for the Planning Commission hearings; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Planned Development Prezoning, Tentative Map and Annexation subject to conditions prepared by Staff; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard and considered all said reports, recommendations and written and oral testimony submitted at the public hearing as herein above set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby find that: 1. The subject property is located within the adopted Sphere of Influence for the City of Dublin. 2. The proposed annexation will be a logical extension of City of Dublin boundaries. 3. The City of Dublin can provide high quality and efficient services to the site. 4. The proposed annexation will be consistent with the Dublin General Plan. 6 A n nqr, (1711 99-Its T, I" n CAw-fir11 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution of appliation to LAFCO pursuant to Government Code Section 56800 regarding Annexation No. 9 consisting of 196+ acres PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director - 2 - January 17, 1990 Maureen O'Halloran Senior Planner City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Blvd. P.O. Box 2340 Dublin, CA 94568 RE: PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon Dear Maureen, Donlan Canyon Ranch, Ltd, a California Limited Partnership, as owner of that certain property consisting of +197 acres known as Donlan Canyon fronting on the 580 freeway located in Alameda County, hereby authorizes the City of Dublin to prezone and annex said property into the City of Dublin. Sincerely, RcCEIVED J Pi 1 9 1990 DUBLIN PLANNING R .CE VED By: ichae Gleason DtCJ P- 1989 General Partner DUSL LANNING ATTACHMENT I, &wt., r .r Pfl s9 ias RECEIVED DONLAN CANYON 0 CT 1 3 1989 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DUBLIN PLANNING Donlan Canyon Ranch is 197 +/- acres adjacent to the City of Dublin at its western boundary, and consisting of two large Oak/Bay woodlands, Donlan Creek and portions of two dominant ridgelines. Based on our site assessment, feasibility and market conditions, we are requesting Prezoning Annexation and approval of a tentative map. It is our intent to dedicate 170 +/- acres to the City, East Bay Regional Park District or to both. This acreage includes both woodland areas and ridgelines that make up two of the most prominent ridgelines in Dublin's sphere. It is our request that if our proposal is acceptable to the City and subsequently approved that we exchange some of our 170 acres for approximately 1 acre adjacent to the frontage road (Parcel C). To produce a natural appearing hillside project which is integrated into existing slopes, the grading will be limited where possible to a 3:1 slope. This gentle slope will increase the area which is graded, however the end result will be a rounded, flowing, rural setting. Benching will be avoided where possible. Geologic restoration will be required for portions of the site that are prone to landslides. Grading to gentler slopes and the use of fill from the graded areas for buttressing the slopes are some means of restoration that will be employed. The illustrative development plan generally depicts filling of the previously disturbed canyon floor to a point where the natural creek conditions exist approximately 2000 feet from the frontage road. Grading on the saddle for the single family lots will allow for generous side and rear yard setbacks that will reduce the visibility of the homes from off site. As another visual consideration the hillside homes will be custom designed to maximize their fitting the site. Revegetation of graded areas will give a more naturalistic appearance to the landscape. S is L g'0 ?Pfr-125 pofIran C/NIYe" The typical landscape character of the region is that of rounded, grassy hills weaving through scattered oaks and woodlands massing at the draws and ravines where water or seasonal run off is available. Native grasses and flora of the Oak woodland and Riparian environment will be reintroduced following the natural pattern of the area. Measures have been established in coordination with the State Department of Fish and Game to mitigate development impacts on the riparian environment. A more intense native riparian planting will be established along this zone with trees being replaced at a ratio of three to one. A natural spring at the head of the draw will be preserved and opened up to provide water to the riparian environment. Access to the project will be made form Dublin Boulevard for the apartments and the Hansen project for the single family. The majority of roads on the site will be at a gradual grade and run nearly parallel to the topographic contours or be integrated into a natural land form. Visual and erosion control measures such as hydroseeding & selective landscaping will be utilized. The loop access road has been provided to maintain good emergency accessibility. In general, utilities will have to be made available to the project. The development proposes the construction of two water tanks and the requisite facilities. Negotiations are on-going with the Dublin San Ramon Service District as to their requirements for this site. The developers have made a request to extend the Districts' upper zone boundary; this will have no effect on the adequacy of service. Sewer disposal will be provided by DSRSD it is our understanding that capacity is available. All other utilities and services are standard and available. Application No. : ?(W:e6c(' VZ 5 Part I Submitted On _ (Date) APPENDIX D -- (PART II) INITIAL STUDY - (ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM) (To be completed pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines, S 1.6.) I. BACKGROUND 1. Name, Address and Phone Number of P Sponnent: 6-ce c homAS -1Rr..ern (sro.,{-� S.iMC <._MuRmoL '54 ) 523 -l- 5,,Z14-S( 1 LArG 400lcf 2. Agency Requiring Checklist: // l-'.l (— -o" 3. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 7i onk x. C-A-`LU 'SY) rDrPrezc,,;ny 1-,m R-p 4,-.a.AA 4, . II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all answers is required. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) YESMAYBE NOSOURCE2 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: — 8 a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes of geologic substructures? X -f S b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X -'g c. Change in topography or ground surface ' relief features? X 21 B d. The destruction, covering or — — modification of any unique geologic or physical features? /Ztg e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,either on or off the site? 7oviroq-e- T TUi7 ?q.SR- 125 7)6)4( 4n9cii 2Refers to appropriate note on page 9. Appendix D (Initial Study/Part II) Page 2 YESMAYBE NO SOURCE ef. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X U g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: X e a. Substantial air emissions of deterioration of ambient air quality? X QJ b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Construction or alteration of a facility within one-fourth of a mile of a school which might emit hazardous air emissions? If Yes, school district must be consulted and must be given written notification of the project not less than 30 days prior to approval of EIR or Negative Declaration (Pub. Res. Code 21151.4) . 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: Y U a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of • surface water runoff? — gj c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Appendix D (Initial Study/Part II) Page 3 YESMAYBE NO SOURCE g d. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x $ e. Alteration of the direction of rate of flow of ground waters? ef. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? 5 g. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? x h. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: 6 a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X /J b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? Xc. Introduction of new species of plants in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: the diversity 8 a. Change in of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? X _-a b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? Appendix D (Initial Study/Part II) Page 4 YESMAYBE NO SOURCE ec. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? xg d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? gb. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? )< 0 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce — Ly new light or glare? Xg4 //f 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use or an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 6 b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: X a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 67b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? `I11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? n n Appendix D (Initial Study/Part II) Page 5 YESMAYBE NO SOURCE OO 2,11 HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional — vehicular movement? X g b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X g c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation and traffic systems? X 0 d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or /j goods? x ,Y� e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: !\ a. Fire protection? x 8 b. Police protection? X c. Schools? 8 d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X 8 e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: XA a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or — energy? /'1 /*1 Appendix D (Initial Study/Part II) Page 6 YESMAYBE NO SOURCE b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? 9 c. Water? �( d. Sewer or septic tanks? X (/ e. Storm water drainage? gj f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: Xa. Creation of any health hazard or -- — potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? k b. Exposure of people to potential health — j hazards? �f 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? • 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. X 6/ a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? Appendix D (Initial Study/Part II) Page 7 YESMAYBE NO SOURCE Qj b. Will the proposal result in adverse -- — physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric, historic, or architecturally significant building, structure, or object? Qj c. Does the proposal have the potential to — cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. X8 a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X8j b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future.) x 3 c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is • d. sdiogensifthcantro$ j ect have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Appendix D (Initial Study/Part II) Page 8 YESMAYBE NO SOURCE 22. EIR REQUIRED BY STATUTE. K G a. Does the project involve construction of any facility which burns municipal waste or refuse-derived fuel? NOTE: If the answer is yes, then an EIR must be prepared and certified under Public Resources Code § 21151.2(a) unless subsections (b) and (c) make that section inapplicable. III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Attach Statement) IV. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: A I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// Appendix D (Initial Study/Part II) Page 9 described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that State statute requires that an ENVIRONMENTAL IIMMMPPACT REPORT be prepared and certified. CD (Signature) (Title) ( 4 MI i 6 6 A4-6GQ"-`4A/ (Printed Name) (Date) (1) Determination based on location of project. (2) Determination based on staff office review. (3) Determination based on field review. (4) Determination based on the City of Dublin General Plan. (5) Determination based on the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance. (6) Determination based on Specific Plan. (7) -Not applicable. (8) Other (state data) . RRLIE4 EIR 1Ag7-o12- DorneLn CarneN GPfF k5c-1-( No• Sc ico q-00 PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON PD PREZONING, TENTATIVE MAP AND ANNEXATION INITIAL STUDY III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Pursuant to Section 15153(c) and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, the earlier EIR prepared for Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment, an Earlier project PA 87-012 (SCH No. 88100406) was used to document the finding that the project as proposed would not have a significant effect on the environment. The earlier EIR prepared for PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment addressed the issues and impacts related to earth, air, water, plant life, animal life, noise, light/glare, land use, natural resources, risk of upset, population, transportation/circulation, public services, energy, utilities, health, aesthetics, recreation and cultural resources. The EIR required specific mitigation measures which are incorporated into the project (see attached mitigation summary and mitigation monitoring program for earlier EIR for PA 87- 012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment). The EIR determined that with incorporation of the mitigation measures, the impacts are not significant. [IS-DONLN] I I 3. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS N All impacts that were identified during the course of this environmental analysjs are itemized in the following section. The level of significance of these impacts is presented, both with and without mitigation measures.1 The mitigated impact implies that all mitigations should be implemented, unless otherwise indicated in this summary. Adverse impacts that are unavoidable and which cannot be mitigated to a less than significant 111 level are noted. This summary should be used in conjunction with a thorough reading of the report in order to have the full description of impacts and mitigation measures. The 111 summary is intended as an overview; the report serves as the basis for this summary. Level of Significance Without With Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Geology and Soils Impact Signific,ant Moderate Project Sponsor 01 Construction in areas of known slope instability and known landslide deposits. Mitigation Remove and/or repair landslides located in areas of development. Slides abutting the proposed multi-family unit development area should be repaired through removal of water from wet beds and actual slide mass. Impact Significant Moderate Project Sponsor Grading in areas of slope instability. N N 86184 i-I 3. Summar'-sf Environmental Impacts Level of Significance Without With Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Geology Mitigation All grading activities should be conducted under the supervision of a registered professional in the state of California specializing in the field of soil and geologic engineering. Said soil engineer shall have a full-time repre- sentative on site during grading and certify that the grading was done to their specifications and recommenda- tions. All activities must conform to the requirements of City of Dublin Ordinance 58-87. Impact Significant Moderate Project Sponsor Groundshaking from seismic events along nearby active faults. Mitigation All construction should be completed in accordance with the requirements for Zone 4 of the Uniform Building Code. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Previous land uses or on-site fill Significant material may have affected the shallow groundwater underlying the fill material. Mitigation Install one groundwater monitoring well and sample in accordance with EPA procedures and the samples analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons on a regular basis. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Petroleum hydrocarbons and oil and Significant grease identified in the shallow subsurface in the artificial fill area could affect construction workers. Mitigation All construction activities in the artificial fill area should be undertaken in accordance with a site safety plan. 1 86184 3-2 3. Summary ^3nvironmental Impacts IILevel of Significance. Without With Mitigation IIMitigation Mitigation Responsibility II Soils Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Damage to structures from expansive Significant 1111 soils. Mitigation d Follow recommendations from geotechnical engineers for project site. IIHydrology Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor II Damage to structures and settlement Significant from questionable quality of artificial fill near mouth of canyon. II Mitigation Follow recommendations from geotechnical engineers for project site. III Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Increases in flooding potential at Significant II Interstate 580 culvert from watershed development. Mitigation IIConstruct detention basin(s)on-site upstream from Interstate 580 culvert. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Increases in flooding potential upstream Significant from proposed culverting of Donlan 1 Creek. Mitigation II Establish a maintenance program for the culvert and upstream open creek channel through a homeowners'association, which is agreed upon by the City and the project sponsor. II86184 3 1 I- 3. Summary�f Environmental Impacts Level of Significance Without With Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Hydrology continued Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Increased sedimentation during Significant construction activities to downstream areas, resulting in potential increases in flooding along Dublin Creek. Mitigation Implement erosion and sediment control measures during construction at and near Donlan Creek. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Open upper end of storm drain pipe will Significant allow debris to be wedged into pipe and could be an attractive nuisance for children playing in the area. Mitigation A moveable trash rack should be designed to cover the upstream end of the storm drain pipe. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor The plugging of the upper end of the Significant storm drain pipe could cause flooding of the apartment site. Mitigation Design a floodway through the project that would preclude inundation of habitable structures. Vegetation and Wildlife Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor Grassland, oak/bay woodland, and Significant Significant riparian vegetation will be displaced by proposed buildings,roads, parking and grading. 86184 3-4 ^ 3.Summary o^vironmental Impacts Level of Significance= Without With Mitigation I Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Vegetation and Wildlife continued 1 Mitigation Preservation of remaining 171 acres as parkland. Dedication area use should be I limited to protect the natural resources. Existing unpaved roads which enter this area should be blocked off to prevent I access by motorized vehicles. Grazing should be discontinued,if possible. If grazing is continued,a maximum carrying capacity of the land should be established and enforced to prevent overgrazing and denudation of slopes and woodland understory. IImpact Potentially Not Project Sponsor Careless construction and grading could Significant Significant I disturb vegetation outside of the proposed construction and grading zones. Mitigation Temporary fencing should be provided during construction for those areas of riparian and/or oak/bay woodland habitat I not intended to be included in the construction or grading zones. N Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor Clearing during construction could lead Significant Significant to erosion and siltation,covering downslope vegetation and adversely affecting water quality. Mitigation 0 An erosion and siltation control plan should be incorporated within the grading plan for the project prior to construction of the project. A revegetation effort on all graded slopes should be undertaken as soon as possible after clearing. I 86184 3 I 3. Summary Environmental Impacts Level of Significance. Without With Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Vegetation and Wildlife continued Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor Riparian vegetation will be removed Significant Significant along the lower portion of Donlan Creek. Mitigation The creation of the new habitat corridor on Lot 1, as approved by the California Department of Fish and Game, should be undertaken as soon as possible after construction and should consist of the minimum habitat widths (20 to 40 feet) and vegetation types as preliminarily proposed. Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor Development of Lot 1 will require the Significant Significant removal of 230 trees. Mitigation A tree size and location survey to be undertaken prior to prezoning and tentative map application submittal. A grading study to be undertaken to try and save as many trees as possible especially 24 large ones. Any tree removed with a trunk diameter greater than 6 inches at DBH should be replaced with a similar native species on a 3 to 1 basis. Replacement trees should be at least five gallon container stock size. The 24 large trees removed should be replaced with bay trees at a size of 10 gallons or greater. A maintenance program should be established for these trees to provide water, fertilizer, pruning, and protection from browsing by wildlife and vandalizing. Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor Inappropriate landscape plant proposed Significant Significant in project. I 86184 I I e1 3.Summary i,. Environmental Impacts ILevel of Significance Without With Mitigation IMitigation Mitigation Responsibility IVegetation and Wildlife continued Mitigation I Eucalyptus should be eliminated from the proposed landscaping because it can become invasive in surrounding native IIwoodlands. Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor 111 Culverting of the lower portion of Lot 1 Significant Significant prevents access by wildlife. Mitigationadditional III additioio nal length of new habitat should be established on the west side of Lot 1 between the existing oak/bay I woodland and the northerly end of the habitat proposed near Building 4. Revegetation of this area will provide an III additional link between new habitat and existing wildlife habitat. Similar size and type trees and understory should be planted and maintained as proposed for the remainder of the habitat area. Special care should be taken in designing and planting this area as the slope will be very steep west of proposed fire lane. 1/11 Land Use There are no mitigation measures ! required for Land Use. See Section 4.5 I for a full discussion of issues. 111 Aesthetics and Visual Quality Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor I Grading due to construction would alter Significant the existing appearance of the site, re move site vegetation and expose soil to erosion. I , I lLE f C Py 86184 3 7 ^ 3.Summa of Environmental Impacts Level of Significance Without With Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Aesthetics and Visual Quality continued Mitigation Round and feather graded slopes to achieve a naturally contoured appear- ance. Preserve mature trees determined to be of importance. Revegetate/hydro- seed disturbed slopes as soon as possible. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Grading activity may damage trees to be Significant preserved. Mitigation Temporary fencing should be provided during construction so as not to disturb the area beneath the drip line of the retained trees. No work should be allowed in this area. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Visual character of the site would Significant change from rural to suburban. Mitigation Develop design guidelines which estab- lish building colors, materials and fin- ishes which are compatible with the sur- rounding terrain. Road widths should meet City standards. Rolled curbs and gutters are okay for private streets. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Night lighting and glare would increase Significant with the proposed project. Mitigation Reflective finishes should not be used on site structures. Excessive exterior light- ing should be avoided,focused down or shielded but not to the point of compromising security. Lighting on project access roads should be focused and directed to prevent light spill-over. 1 86184 3-8 4 3.Summary a_ 2,nvironmental Impacts ILevel of Significance Without With Mitigation IMitigation Mitigation Responsibility Aesthetics and Visual Quality continued IImpact Significant Not Project Sponsor Views from 1-580(a designated scenic Significant highway)would be impacted by develop- ment of Lots 2-9 and 16-18, which are within an area of"High"visual con- straints. 111 Mitigation Parcels 2-9 and 16-18 should not be IIdeveloped as proposed. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Construction of single-family homes may Significant 111 interfere with views of the site's ridge- line. II Mitigation Site homes well below ridgelines. 11 Public Services Fire Protection 111 Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Due to undeveloped surrounding land, Significant II there is a higher risk of fire than in subdivisions located in more developed surroundings. 11 Mitigation All roof covering must be of fire retard- ant material. Fire-proof landscaping IIshould be used in public areas. Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor III Project is outside the 1.5 mile limit from Significant the fire station per Building Code. 4 Mitigation All of the project must be equipped with automatic fire suppression system. + Grades are limited to 15% by Fire Code. ii r86184 3-8 3. Summary^environmental Impacts iLevel of Significance Without With Mitigation 11 Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor g Personal security for homes on the site Significant Significant is impact seen by police. Mitigation II List of security measures is contained in Section 3.8. IISchools II Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor/ The project,by itself, would not impact Significant Significant School District the DUSD. Cumulatively there could be overcrowding in the DUSD elementary IIIschools. Mitigation II The District could implement an impact fee and this would be the extent of the mitigation required by law. Parks II Impact Not Not Project Sponsor The City's subdivision ordinance would Significant Significant require about 2 acres of parkland or IIIequivalent in-lieu fee payment. Mitigation The project sponsor would be required to El comply with the City's subdivision • ordinance. 111 Solid Waste III Impact Not Not Project Sponsor The proposed project would generate Significant Significant about 473 tons of solid waste per year. III Mitigation No mitigation measure is required. This is within allowable City limits. 86184 ,-1I 3. Summary of Environmental Impacts11 Level of Significance 11 Without With Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility IL Fire Protection continued Impact Significant Not Project Sponsorill Road serving single family homes ex- Significant ceeds 600-foot length in Fire Code. Mitigation II Road should meet Fire Code. This requires either redesign to shorten road or by allowing two access points into ii project. Impact Potentially Not Project SponsorII Project borders on open space with high Significant Significant fire potential. Mitigation II Design fire break with City required minimum 30 foot width,planted with fire retardant vegetation. Allow open space access every 300 feet required. Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor Dead end road serving single-family Significant Significant units is longer than 150 feet in length. Exceeds Code restrictions. Mitigation Dead end roads exceeding 150 feet must have a turn-around approved by DRFA. A minimum fire flow of 1,500 gpm must be provided. Police Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor I Along with other projects in the area, Significant Significant Donlan Canyon necessitates another patrol unit. Mitigation Another patrol unit should be provided for the area. I 1 86184 3-Id 3. Summary of Environmental Impacts Level of Significance Without With Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Water Impact Not Not Project Sponsor The proposed project would generate a Significant Significant need for about 57,000 gpd. Mitigation Project sponsor would pay required fees to DSRSD and to Zone 7. Sewer Impact Not Not Project Sponsor The proposed project would generate Significant Significant about 51,740 gpd. Mitigation Project sponsor would pay required fees to DSRSD. Fiscal Analysis Impact There would be a positive revenue flow to the City with development of the project. There are no mitigation measures needed. Traffic and Circulation Impact Not Project Sponsor/ Increase in LOS to level F for existing Significant Significant City plus Project plus Cumulative traffic volumes. Increase in LOS to level E for existing plus Project. Mitigation Major geometric improvements would be needed as stated in Section 4.9 I I 86184 3-12 3.Summary.nvironmental Impacts 1 Level of Significance- Without With Mitigation 111 Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Air Quality $ Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor Construction activities would temporar- Significant Significant ily increase TSP and PM10 concentra- 11 tions near project site. Mitigation 11 Watering of exposed earth surfaces during construction activities. Daily clean-up of mud and dust onto street ii surfaces. Tarpaulin haul trucks. Replant and repair disturbed earth to reduce soil, wind erosion. I Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor 4 Traffic-related air pollutant emissions Significant Significant would be generated by the project. Mitigation 11 See mitigation measures proposed by TJKM and Associates. I Impact Potentially Not Project Sponsor Increased CO levels are probable. Significant Significant II Mitigation City of Dublin should institute CO"hot spot"monitoring program under the guidance of the BAAQMD. Noise 11 Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor Temporary high noise levels on and Significant II around site during construction. Mitigation Construction work should be limited to daylight hours and weekdays. High noise potential equipment and operations should be muffled or controlled. p 111 86184 3 13 3. Summary Environmental Impacts Level of Significance Without With Mitigation Mitigation Mitigation Responsibility Noise continued Impact Significant Not Project Sponsor New homes impacted by noise generated Significant by cumulative traffic using local roadways,especially I-580. Mitigation Provision should be made for acoustic analysis of project structures and instal- lation of any additional noise insulation required by condominium/apartment units to meet Title 25 requirements. Historic and Archaeological Resources It is unlikely that there is any prehistoric Significant Not Project Sponsor site/remnants in the project area not Significant previously disturbed. Therefore, mitigation measures are not warranted unless archaeological or historic resources are encountered. lAs defined in Chapter 2.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 21068, "Significant Effect on the Environment means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment." "Insignificant," "Low," "Moderate" and "High" are not defined in Section 21068, but are used in this document as terms to provide a frame of reference for the reader as to the magnitude and importance of the various impacts discussed. Accordingly, the following definitions, as used in the EIR, are provided as follows: Significant - constitutes substantial long- or short-term alterations to existing environmental conditions. High - constitutes less than substantial long- or short-term alterations to existing environmental conditions. Moderate - constitutes less than high or substantial and not excessive apparent long- or short-term alterations to existing environmental conditions(not a high or low impact). Low - constitutes minor or short-term alterations to existing environmental conditions I (not a moderate or insignificant impact). Not Significant - constitutes no apparent alterations to existing environmental I conditions. I 86184 3-14 RESOLUTION NO. 097 - 89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR PA 87-012 DONLAN CANYON WHEREAS, Public Resources Code 21081.6 requires the City to adopt a reporting or monitoring program for changes in a project or conditions imposed to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects in order to ensure compliance during project implementation; and WHEREAS, on July 17, 1989, the Planning Commission recommended City Council certification of the Donlan Canyon EIR as complete and adequate, and recommended City Council adoption of the Donlan Canyon EIR mitigation monitoring program; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 1989, the City Council held a noticed public hearing to consider PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon EIR/GPA; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 1989, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 096-89 certifying the Donlan Canyon EIR (PA 87-012) as complete and adequate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin City Council does adopt the "Donlan Canyon EIR Mitigation Monitoring Program" attached hereto as Attachment B-1 as the monitoring program required by Public Resources Code 21081.6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 1989. AYES: Councilmembers Jeffrey, Snyder, Vonheeder and Mayor Moffatt NOES: Councilmembers Hegarty ABSENT: None at, i91 Mayor ATTEST: —2/mac City Clerk PA 87-012 DONLAN CANYON EIR MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM JULY 5, 1989 The Applicant shall be responsible for any and all costs incurred in monitoring mitigation measures. For detailed information on impacts and mitigation measures refer to Donlan Canyon Environmental Impact Report. RESOURCE IMPACT MONITORING ACTION VERIFICATION Geology/ Slope Instability, 1. The developer submits 1. Planning Dept Soils landslides, expansive grading plans in con- with Public soils, quality of junction with T.Map Works Dept. artificial fill Planning application input (in terms of physical and chemical characteristics) 2. Prior to grading, 2. Public Works developer submits Department & specific soils report/ Building Dept geotechnical report and erosion control/main- tenance plan, with improvement plans. Grading permits will not be issued unless plans reflect recommendation of soils report/geotech- nical report, erosion control and maintenance plan. 3. Prior to grading the 3. Alameda Co. developer submits site Health Care safety plan for protection Services, of construction workers. Dept of (hydrocarbon contamination) Environmental Health with Public Works Dept. input. Hydrology Increased Flooding 1.'Developer submits drainage 1. Public Works Potential plans/hydrology report in Department conjunction with T.Map application. Grading permits will not be issued unless plans reflect recom- mendation in hydrology report. -1- RESOURCE , IMPACT MONITORING ACTION VERIFICATION Hydrology 2. See #2 Monitoring Action 2. Public Works (cont'd) Geology/Soils erosion and Department sediment control plan submitted by Developer. 3. Developer obtains 3. State Dept of necessary permits for Fish & Game, work in creek areas. U.S. Army Corp of Engrs Vegetation/ Oak/Bay Woodland 1. The Developer submits 1. Planning Dept Wildlife riparian vegetation detailed tree survey/ with input wildlife horticultural report, from Public tree preservation study, Works and landscape plan, tree Dept of Fish replacement plan and and Game revised habitat revege- tation in conjunction with T.Map and Prezoning Planning Application. 2. Qualified biologist con- 2. Planning Dept ducts a systematic with input inventory of site to from US Dept determine presence of of Fish and San Joaquin kit fox. Wildlife City hires biologist, developer funds cost. 3. Prior to grading, the 3. Public Works developer submits plan for Dept. with temporary fencing around input from areas not to be graded to Planning Dept protect riparian or oak/bay woodland area not intended for grading or construction. 4. The Developer, in conjunc- 4. Planning Dept tion with T.Map and Prezoning with input application submits specific from Public proposal for dedication and Works Dept maintenance of open space area, or include in CC&R's and dedicate scenic easement. -2- r1 RESOURCE • IMPACT MONITORING ACTION VERIFICATION Vegetation/ 5. Developer submits PD 5. Planning Dept Wildlife Pre-zoning regulations with input (cont'd) restricting development, from Public prohibiting grading, and Works Dept. tree removal within the woodland area located within the proposed low density single-family residential area and/or includes restrictions in CC&R's. Aesthetics/ Unit Visability 1. Developer submits site 1. Planning Dept Visual Quality I-580/I-680 specific visual impact study in conjunction w/T.Map and Prezoning application. 2. Developer submits 2. Public Works revised grading plan with Planning with T.Map application. Dept input 3. Developer submits PD regu- 3. Planning Dept lations restricting with Public development on portions of Works input site having "high" visual constraints. 4. Developer submits prelim- 4. Planning Dept inary landscape plan in conjunction with T.Map and Prezoning application. Public Service Fire, Police 1. Developer submits prelim- 1. Planning Dept Security inary landscape plans incor- with DRFA porating fire resistant input plants in conjunction with T.Map and Prezoning application. 2. Developer submits plans in 2. DRFA, Building compliance with Fire and Dept. Planning Building code regulations in Dept., and conjunction with T.Map and Public Works prior to issuance of building Department permits including fire proof roofing, automatic fire suppression system, and main- tenance and emergency access to open space. -3- • -RESOURCE . IMPACT ^ MONITORING ACTION^ VERIFICATION Public 3. Prior to final inspection 3. Dublin Police Service the Developer complies Dept. and (cont'd) with Police security Building Dept requirements 4. Developer pays fire impact 4. DRFA fee per unit and per square footage of non-dwelling unit buildings as contribu- tion to further fire station needs. Parks • 1. Developer complies with 1. Public Works subdivision ordinance and Planning requirements for parkland Departments dedication or park in-lieu fee prior to Final Map. 2. Developer submits proposal 2. Recreation for public access to open Dept and space and dedication of open Planning space at the subdivision and Department prezoning stage. Traffic/ Dublin Boulevard/ 1. Developer constructs 1. Public Works Circulation San Ramon Road improvements or contri- Department intersection; butes share of cost with input Dublin Boulevard/ of improvement prior to from traffic Silvergate Final Map. consultant intersection Noise Generated by I-580 1. Developer submits site 1. Building Dept specific acoustical with input analysis study in con- from Planning junction with Site Department Development Review application, complies with recommendations during building permit and con- struction stage. Developer 'installs soundwalls and/or sound deading windows and walls, if necessary. -4- NEGATIVE DECLARATION (To be prepared pursuant to City of Dublin Environmental Guidelines , Section 1 . 7 (c) , 5 . 5 ) Description of Project: PA 89-125 Donlan Canyon PD Prezoning, Tentative Map, and Annexation of 197+ acres Project Location: Western terminus of Dublin Boulevard, Alameda County Name of Proponent : George Thomas , Paragon Group, 523 West 6th Street, Suite 515 , Los Angeles , CA 90014 I hereby find that the above project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Attached is a copy of the Initial Study ( "Environmental Information Form" and Environmental Checklist" ) documenting the reasons to support the above finding. Pursuant to Section 15153 (c) and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines , the earlier EIR prepared for PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment, an earlier project, was used to document the finding. The following mitigation measures are included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects on the environment . ( If no mitigation measures are included, indicate "not applicable" . If mitigation measures are included, a Monitoring/Reporting Plan must be attached) : Not Applicable . The earlier EIR Monitoring/Reporting Plan (attached) for PA 87-012 Donlan Canyon General Plan Amendment ( SCH No . 88100406 ) designed to ensure that the mitigation measures are carried out during the project ' s implementation is hereby incorporated and fully made part of this Negative Declaration. Signature Laurence L. Tong Printed Name Planning Director Title May 31 , 1990 Date 5 - (PA-85--is5 Dc;.,tom.. ( /1 n Attachments Date Published: Date Posted: Date Notice Mailed: Considered by: on: Action on Negative Declaration: Approved Disapproved Notice of Determination filed: Council Resolution No.