Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
6/6/1988 PC Agenda
AGENDA CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting - Dublin Library Monday - 7:00 p.m. 7606 Amador Valley Blvd., Meeting Room June 6, 1988 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 4. ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA 5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING - May 16, 1988 6. ORAL COMMUNICATION - At this time, members of the audience are permitted to address the Planning Commission on any item which is not on the Planning Commission agenda. Comments should not exceed 5 minutes. If any person feels that this is insufficient time to address his or her concern, that person should arrange with the Planning Director to have his or her particular concern placed on the agenda for a future meeting. 7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8.1 Proposed Plan Line - New Road Parallel to and Southerly of Dublin Boulevard (Between Amador Plaza Road and Regional Street) 8.2 PA 88-015 Kaufman & Broad Conditional Use Permit request for a Special Easement Sign at 6379 Clark Avenue 8.3 PA 88-023 Liquor Barn Site Development Review Appeal regarding Conditions of Approval of request to remodel existing building at 6633 Dublin Boulevard 8.4 PA 88-044 Marg-ett Arts & Crafts Show Conditional Use Permit request to operate two shows at Dublin Plaza Shopping Center (between Mervyns and Albertsons) on Regional Street between Dublin Boulevard and Amador Valley Boulevard 8.5 PA 88-050 Love and Care Daycare Conditional Use Permit request to continue operation of a daycare center at 7624 Hillrose Drive 8.6 PA 88-042 Avcar Rental Conditional Use Permit request to operate a vehicle rental office and lot at the Howard Johnson Hotel, 6680 Regional Street 8.7 PA 88-031 The Good Guys Stereo Installation Facility Conditional Use Permit request to allow car stereo installation in the Enea Plaza Retail Complex at 6700 Amador Plaza Road 9. NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9.1 Planning Commission Training Session 10. OTHER BUSINESS 11. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONCERNS 12. ADJOURNMENT (Over for Procedures Summary) ment Services r CITY OF DUBLIN Development Planning,'Zoning 829-4916 P.O. Box 2340 3uilding & Safety 829-0822 Dublin, CA 94568 Engineering/Public Works 829-4927 DECLARATION OF POSTING I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Agenda for the Dublin Planning Commission meeting of , ce , 198X, was posted at the Dublin Library, 7606 Amador Valley (B)oulevard, Dublin, California, on the F ofvut_ , 198�5, by /)ira p.m. . Executed this 3 i day of , 198 at Dublin, California. 9C,t1N-Q-_, Laurence L. Tong Planning Commission Secretary by if7.el a_01.CUIA Pla40 ng Secretary % CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT Planning Commission Meeting Date: June 6, 1988 SUBJECT: Proposed Plan Line - New Road Parallel to and Southerly of Dublin Boulevard (Between Amador Plaza Road and Regional Street) EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibits A) Resolution Recommending City Council Adoption of Negative Declaration B) Resolution Recommending City Council Adoption of Plan Line Attachments 1) Plan Line Alternatives 2) Cross Section in Downtown Specific Plan 3) Proposed Cross Section 4) Description of Plan Line Alternative 1 5) Description of Plan Line Alternative 3 6) Environmental Assessment Initial Study 7) Negative Declaration 8) Existing Parcels 9) Letter from Harvey Levine 5/2/88 10) Letter from John G. Enea 5/9/88 11) Letter from Harvey Levine 5/16/88 RECOMMENDATION: 1) Open Public Hearing 2) Receive Staff presentation and public testimony �p 3) Question Staff and the public d14,/ 4) Close Public Hearing and deliberate 5) Take the following actions a) Adopt Resolution Recommending City Council Adoption of Negative Declaration b) Adopt Resolution Recommending City Council Approval of Plan Line FINANCIAL STATEMENT: No direct financial impacts would occur from the recommended action. Costs to the City as a result of development of the road would depend on the financing mechanism selected for this project. A separate action would be required by the City Council to authorize financing the project. DESCRIPTION: The circulation plan for the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan includes recommended changes to improve downtown circulation. One such improvement is a new street parallel to and southerly of Dublin Boulevard connecting Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road. The Downtown Plan shows the approximate location of this road midway between Dublin Boulevard and I-580. The precise alignment for this new street must be established through the adoption of a plan line. City Staff, including TJKM, the City's traffic engineer, has examined the area and prepared recommendations for the plan line. The Planning Commission previously held public hearings (April 4, 1988, and May 2, 1988) on the plan line for this road. In addition, the Planning Commission further deliberated on the item at the May 16, 1988, meeting. ITEM NO. ILI_ COPIES TO: Property Owners File n At the May 16, 1988, meeting, the Commission considered a motion to approve plan line alignment Alternative 1. That motion received a 2-1-2 vote (2 for, 1 against, 2 absent or abstaining). The Planning Commission needs three votes to approve a motion. Section 4 of the ordinance for establishing plan lines states that before an action is taken by the City Council, the proposal shall be referred to the Planning Commission for a recommendation. The City Attorney has recommended, in light of the Commission's Rules of Procedure and the plan line ordinance Section 4, that the Commission hold a new public hearing on the item to send a specific recommendation to the City Council. Should the Commission not have three votes on a motion to recommend an alignment, the Commission may take a vote on a motion which specifically states that no specific alignment is recommended. If both of these attempts fail to receive a majority vote, the item will then be forwarded to the Council without a recommendation. Need A parallel road south of Dublin Boulevard would offer the following benefits to downtown circulation and traffic flow. 1) Traffic conditions at major intersections along Dublin Boulevard would be equalized. This cross-connection would allow alternative routes out onto Dublin Boulevard and relieve congestion at the Regional Street/Dublin Boulevard intersection. 2) Three long cul-de-sacs would be eliminated, facilitating movement, especially for emergency vehicles. 3) Access from one cul-de-sac to another would be provided without requiring travel on Dublin Boulevard. 4) Internal circulation would be provided in the area south of Dublin Boulevard, which will encourage development of property consistent with the land uses designated in the Downtown Specific Plan and provide additional pedestrian links in the area. 5) Access would be provided to the future BART parking lot from three access points rather than concentrating traffic at Golden Gate Drive. In general, the road would have area-wide (downtown) circulation benefits by providing an alternate route. Size and Capacity The Dublin General Plan contains Policy 5.1.F in the Circulation Element which reads: "Connect existing cul-de-sac streets near proposed BART station south of Dublin Boulevard." A new street is shown on the General Plan Map. Diagram 4 and Diagram 6 of the Downtown Specific Plan show a new street and a street right-of-way section of 65 feet (see Attachment 2), which would provide two traffic lanes and a center two-way left turn lane (44 feet) plus parkways on either side (15 feet and 6 feet). TJKM, the City's traffic engineer, has evaluated the projected traffic for this road and has revised the optimal section to be 68 feet (see Attachment 3), to include two eight-foot sidewalks and two traffic lanes (20 feet each) and a center two-way left turn lane (12 feet). The 20-foot traffic lane could accommodate a 12-foot travel lane and an 8-foot parking lane. The provision of on-street parking would be determined during project design. Final design of the road, given a 68-foot right-of-way, could still take advantage of a wider parkway on one side (e.g., 12 feet on one side and 4 feet on the other). The proposed right-of-way would be able to accommodate about 17,500 average daily trips (ADT). Alternatives Three plan line alternatives were evaluated in detail. Attachment 1 shows all three alternatives. -2- r1 i"1 1) Alternative 1 is the Staff-preferred alternative. This alignment would fall approximately halfway between Dublin Boulevard and the I-580 freeway. The road would be located between the large retail building which houses Orchard Supply, Ross, Levitz, and others, and the warehouse where Unisource is located. The road would proceed across Golden Gate Drive, with the northern edge of the right-of-way falling along the northern property line of the undeveloped parcel owned by the Woolvertons, south of the separate Crown Chevrolet parcel, also owned by the Woolvertons, and connect to the land offered for dedication from the Enea Plaza retail development (see Attachment 1). The Alternative 1 road would leave a 2.35+ acre buildable area on the Enea parcel south of the road. Due to limitations of space between existing buildings, the right-of-way section would need to narrow to 64 feet for approximately 600 feet. This narrower area between the rear of the existing Ross/Orchard Supply building (APN 941-1500-44) and the Unisource building (APN 941-1500-47-2) would provide a minimum 110 feet maneuvering area for trucks at the Unisource warehouse. Issues related to Alternative 1 follow: A) The roadway would necessitate the removal of 191 parking spaces (69 behind Ross/Orchard Supply and 122 from the front of Unisource). Mitigation measures could be included in the project to provide up to 150 additional parking spaces for Unisource (see Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration - Attachments 6 and 7). The reduced parking on the other parcel would not be considered significant due to the low parking occupancy rate in Downtown Dublin. Depending on the final design of the roadway, the street may be able to accommodate on-street parking which would further reduce impacts from the loss of on-site parking. B) The project would also reduce the back-up area for truck loading at Unisource from 121 feet to 110 feet. The 110 feet is considered adequate for 55-foot-long trucks. C) The right-of-way between Golden Gate Drive and Amador Plaza Road would cross undeveloped property. There would not be any significant impacts to existing development. The road would leave a 1.4+ acre buildable area on the undeveloped Woolverton parcel. This size would be sufficient to accommodate a commercial or office use as designated in the Downtown Specific Plan. The location of the road at this location would preclude the contiguous expansion of Crown Chevrolet onto the undeveloped Woolverton parcel to the south. D) This alignment would reduce access to the rear of the Orchard Supply, Ross, Krause's, and Levitz stores. With the exception of the Levitz customer pick-up roll-up door, all the doors along the back of this building are for pedestrian use. They were not designed as truck loading/unloading areas. The location of the roadway adjacent to the rear building sidewalk would preclude the use of these doors for other than pedestrian traffic. Loading for the Ross and Krause's stores would have to be done from the front of the stores. The customer pick-up for Levitz could still be used, although vehicles would not be able to back up to the door in a perpendicular manner. Orchard Supply has a formal truck loading dock on the side of the building which would not be affected by the proposed road. The plan line location in this western portion of the project site was chosen to provide continued use of businesses on both sides of the roadway. The cost for this alignment alternative is estimated to be $3 million. 2) Alternative 2 would place the parallel road adjacent to the freeway (I-580) over the Alameda County Flood Control Channel. Regional Street and Amador Plaza Road would each need to be extended. This alternative would result in approximately 3,200 lineal feet of total roadway. Costs for acquisition, design, and construction would be approximately $6.7 million. The pros and cons of this alignment follow. -3- A) The most significant problem would be that Caltrans has indicated they need 100 to 150 feet of additional right-of-way in this area (See Attachment 1) for the ultimate width of I-580. The remaining comments are made for completeness; however, they would be rendered moot by Caltrans' need for the right-of-way. B) Construction over the Flood Control Channel would be more costly than construction on flat ground. In addition, if the ACFCD were to grant approval to build over their facilities, they would require purchase of the property. Flood Control (Zone 7) would not be favorable to the enclosing of the channel. The long-term costs to replace underground facilities are considerably higher than the costs to maintain an open channel. For this reason, Flood Control would require the City to take over maintenance responsibilities for the underground portion, as well as the upstream portions of the creek. In addition, any alteration to the channel, as it is a part of Dublin Creek, would require review and approval from the Department of Fish and Game and the Corps of Engineers. C) The loss of parking spaces would be less than the preferred alternative (95 vs. 191 spaces). However, there would not be the same opportunity for on-site mitigation of the parking spaces lost. The Willow Tree Restaurant would lose 20 parking spaces, and Howard Johnson's would lose 75 spaces. In addition, the roadway would result in dividing the Howard Johnson's parking lot into two separate parking areas. D) In addition to the loss of parking from the extension of Regional Street, approximately 400 feet of mature landscaping would be removed. However, new landscaping could be planted along the right-of-way edge to replace that which is lost. E) The alignment along the creek would be inconsistent with the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan and would require a General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment before a plan line could be established. F) Location along the freeway lessens the opportunity for a landscaped pedestrian parkway which links the block from Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road. Pedestrians would not be as inclined to use a road adjacent to the freeway due to noise, nor would the location link retail establishments frequented by pedestrians (see (I) below). G) A road at this location would separate the proposed BARTD parking lot from the freeway and the future station. H) This alternative would not provide the incentive for interior circulation, which would lessen the number of vehicles on Dublin Boulevard, because of the greater length and because it moves traffic away from Dublin Boulevard. One of the main objectives of constructing this road is to reduce the traffic on Dublin Boulevard and to ease the congestion at Dublin Boulevard intersections. I) Should the area develop with other uses, there would not be the opportunity for retail business to locate on both sides of the street. Another option for this alternative would be to place the road adjacent to the Flood Control Channel or adjacent to the projected future right-of-way for I-580. Either of these alternatives would put the road through three existing structures: the Unisource warehouse and two offices buildings at the end of Amador Plaza Road. The office buildings would be completely eliminated, but the bulk of the Unisource building could be preserved. The concerns outlined in (C) through (I) above would be similar, however, an additional 26 to 30 parking spaces would be eliminated with no opportunity to replace them. Environmental, fiscal, policy, and regulatory impacts from Alternative 2 would make this alternative undesirable. 3) Alternative 3 would place the road in the middle of the block but it would be located further south than Alternative 1 for the area between Golden Gate Drive and Amador Plaza Road. The length of the road in this area would be only slightly longer than the preferred alternative. This alternative would place the southern edge of the road along the southern property line of the undeveloped parcel owned by the Woolvertons, and it would split the remaining buildable area on the Enea Plaza retail development parcel. The -4- road would leave a 1.4+ acre buildable area on the undeveloped Woolverton parcel, and it would maintain potential for contiguous expansion of Crown Chevrolet onto the adjoining parcel to the south. A) Minor differences in the impact to existing parking would result. Mitigation measures proposed for Alternative 1 could still be implemented with minor modifications. B) This alignment would split the remaining buildable area on the Enea parcel into two (2) areas, 1.06+ acres and 1.29+ acres in size. While both of these areas could develop with commercial uses, it is preferable to have a single larger area (such as the 2.35+ buildable area in Alternative 1) to allow greater design and development flexibility. C) Additional right-of-way would need to be acquired (over the preferred Alternative 1). Right-of-way on the Enea parcel has been offered for dedication as part of a negotiated settlement for a lawsuit pertaining to the Conditions of Approval for the Enea Plaza retail project. Should the road be located further south, the City would have to purchase the right-of-way and perhaps compensate the owner for splitting the 2.35+ acre buildable area. D) This alignment would reduce the BARTD's usable property by about 16,500 square feet. This could mean 40+ fewer parking spaces for the future parking lot. The estimated cost of this alignment is $3.3 million. Discussion In order to evaluate the alternatives, Staff contacted Caltrans, BARTD, and Alameda County Flood Control. From discussion with these three agencies, it appears that Alternative 2 (adjacent to freeway) is the least feasible as all three agencies have serious reservations for that alignment relative to their future plans and current policies. Alternative 3 presents far fewer impacts and reservations than the road adjacent to the freeway. Differences between Alternative 3 and Alternative 1 occur mostly in the eastern area (between Golden Gate Drive and Amador Plaza Road). Alternative 3 would be more costly due to the need to acquire the additional right-of-way from the Eneas. In addition, Alternative 3 results in the creation of two areas smaller than preferred for commercial development on the Enea property. West of Golden Gate Drive, Alternative 3 would require the acquisition of about 16,500 square feet of BARTD property. State Law requires compensation when a parcel is severed because of a public taking. This law may require compensation to the Eneas if Alternative 3 is selected. Timing No precise schedule has been established for constructing the road. The need for the road may become critical when BART develops their property and may be tied into that schedule. Other, more intensive land development in the area could also trigger the need for the road. Costs Preliminary estimated costs for the three alternatives follow. Estimates include acquisition, design, improvement, and environmental mitigation. Alternative 1 - $3 million Alternative 2 - $6.7 million Alternative 3 - $3.3 million Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Resolution recommending adoption of the Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution recommending the City Council approve Plan Line Alternative 1. Should the Commission prefer to recommend Alternative 3, the Commission should adopt the Resolution recommending adoption of the Negative Declaration and then adopt the Resolution recommending Alternative 3. -5- RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CONCERNING A PLAN LINE FOR A NEW ROAD PARALLEL TO AND SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN REGIONAL STREET AND AMADOR PLAZA ROAD, CITY OF DUBLIN WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended together with the State's administrative guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and City environmental regulations, requires that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et. seq., a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared by the Dublin Planning Department with the project specific mitigation measures outlined in Staff's Initial Study of Environmental Significance dated May 25, 1988, regarding: 1) Land Use WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance and considered it at a public hearing on June 6, 1988; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given as legally required; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the project, Parallel Road South of Dublin Boulevard (Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road) Plan Line has been changed by the Applicant and/or the Applicant has agreed to provide mitigation measures resulting in a project that will not result in the potential creation of any significant environmental impacts identified in the Initial Study of Environmental Signficance; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find that the Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been prepared and processed in accordance with State and Local Environmental Law and Guideline Regulations, and that it is adequate and complete. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director RESOLUTION NO. 88- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISH A PLAN LINE FOR PARALLEL ROAD SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD FROM REGIONAL STREET TO AMADOR PLAZA ROAD WHEREAS, the Dublin General Plan, incorporated into the record by reference, was adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin by Resolution No. 12-85 on February 11, 1985; and WHEREAS, the General Plan contains a policy in the circulation element regarding a new street south of Dublin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Dublin Downtown Specific Plan, incorporated into the record by reference, was adopted by the City Council of the City of Dublin by Resolution No. 55-87 on July 21, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan contains an objective in the vehicular circulation plan to develop a plan line for a new street south of Dublin Boulevard connecting Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on June 6, 1988; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has been recommended for adoption (Planning Commission Resolution No. 88- ) for this project, as it will have no significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Staff report was submitted recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the project (Alternative 1); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth; and WHEREAS, the plan line is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing and proposed land uses and conforming to the underlying land use designation and it will not overburden public services; and WHEREAS, the plan line will not have a substantial adverse effect on health or safety or be substantially detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or public improvement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the plan line Alternative as described on the attached Exhibits A and B dated June 1, 1988. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director PA t.Let, R.00.0 . J J i, n DUBLIN BLVD. T L L --- — — rill g i W 9 0 • - ' CROwN ENv-4 71 T. — (1")..." ,j 1 o UNIT BfD o _� I .k.. I " i .lir PREI9WAY o-eeo I DO' , PARALLEL ROAD • •. SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD `' sa 200 FEET BETWEEN REGIONAL STREET AND AMADOR PLAZA ROAD 160 60 '0-_ !. 4A5aria nee �I.IGNM�NT A ,Y.RNAl"I\' ATTACHMENT ,,,..;e_ PAPA LEt.Pail, n n NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL I \\ ✓I/ I 'r• WIDENING OF /� i �:w DUBLIN BOULEVARD v\�\\ u oo if / �• -;`\\ � CD---- " f ' �� \ NEW TRAFFIC I, z. P 1 O �`Q ,\ `\ SIGNAL _ •,..-..,_ . - ,,,,....<,),\.\\ ,,,.._ i 4,, ,,.._,,,„.„,/ a '-' - t z.,..„_.; ,',-; ,:i• • ssl \, ____\ , ..z.,:::*' i--- /, '‘,..:.,\ %el:A „,„ -0000., \AI, ,, - ,,,„,,, ,,‘ III11.,... ) . iiir __, . ;,.. �o� `\ . `. � ` \• \ , ,, \,„, • Si 6 7.1 L--=---'17, -1.:3<-1. , 1.--p , 1-1 =I c*1---"‘— "0_, 'T \T, ------- \ <,'2,\\---:---2 --.. • \. •.0 \, •`. \ ., ---,4,, \\\N„..... . .. ._... ,..., �ctAP-A. . .` " \^ire , / i \,.... .: a �EIS ' �� i „\ / o ' r'o psi '�� F!' ' H __ ,t4 ;--- _ __ ice I , . ,, , I \\ \, '� / NEW STREET \`\1' SAN RAMON ROAD WIDENING SAN RAMON ROADf` a OFF-RAMP IMPROVEMENTS 'wp,'RA 1.Le L rROaD Circulation Improvements DUBLIN DOWNTOWN PLAN t[II] DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA 18 Diagram 4 I - �I PARKWAY j E' f 2 TRAFFIC LANES & TURN LANE 44' r PARKWAY 16' I PROPOSED R.O.W. 65' STREET SOUTH OF DUBLIN BLVD. Proposed Street Sections DUBLIN DOWNTOWN PLAN DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA Diagram 6 ATTACHMENT 2. PiteAu.et, Row .. .. a...w+...,..eo.>,..u..:. ..cvt..:... ..-,.. m...sssa•,..r+..i�ass>>s..... ,.z.s,+..cxs,csr..,ta-.r:rn=Ln4'r.:` :ri�^m�:^Tfic"si7_i;^... :�: a PARALLEL ROAD SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD (REGIONAL STREET TO AMADOR PLAZA ROAD) gi`'" R/w 2 WAY LEFT TURN J_ 8' 20 I ' 20' I g� II OPTIMUM SECTION H[ . P Proposed Street Right-of-Way SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD BETWEEN AMADOR PLAZA ROAD AND REGIONAL STREET All that certain real property situated in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the west line of Amador Plaza Road on the south line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Enea Plaza recorded December 19, 1980, as Instrument No. 80-224805, Records of Alameda County; thence northerly along said west line of Amador Plaza Road 427 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence leaving said west line of Amador Plaza Road along the arc of a non-tangent 30.00 foot radius curve, concave to the northwest, to a point on the prolongation of the north line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Robert T. & Betty J. Wolverton recorded December 20, 1978, as Instrument No. 78-248211, Records of Alameda County; thence on a course tangent tothe previous curve westerly along said prolongation of said north line (7 8-24 8211) a distance of 285 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of said Wolverton Parcel (78-248211); thence westerly along said north line (78-248211) and its prolongation 430 feet, more or less, to a point on the centerline of Golden Gate Drive, hereon referred to as Point "A"; thence in a southwesterly direction 380 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a • radius of 966 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 105 feet, more or less, to a point on the east line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Peter B. Bedford recorded November 21, 1982, as Instrument No. 82-193550, Records of Alameda County, said point hereon referred to as Point "B", lying South 4 feet, measured at right angles to, the prolongation of the south line of an existing warehouse lying on said Bedford parcel (82-193550);thence westerly on a course parallel with said south line of the existing warehouse 330 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the southeast, having a radius of 332 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 125 feet, more or less; thence on a course tangent to the previous curve southwesterly 130 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 266 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 120 feet, more or less, to a point on the south line of said Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence on a course tangent to the previous curve along said south line (82-193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to the east line of Regional Street; thence leaving said south line (82-193550) southerly along said east line of Regional Street to a point 68 feet south, measured at right angles to said south line (82- 193550); thence in an easterly direction parallel with said south line (82-193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius 334 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 90 feet, more or less; thence on a course tangent to the previous curve, ATTACHMENT moues- itoaD A fi t.pG,lP1wN northeasterly 130 teet , more or less , to the eginning of a tangent curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 268 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 80 feet, more or less, to a point 68 feet south of, measured at right angles to , the prolongation of the south line of said existing warehouse lying within the Bedford parcel (82-193550 ); thence easterly parallel with said prolongation 330 feet, more or less, to a point south 64 feet from Point "B" , at the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north , having a radius of 1034 feet ; thence along the arc of said curve 105 feet, more or less; thence on a course tangent to the previous curve, northeasterly 375 feet, more or less , to a point on the centerline of Golden Gate Drive , said point being South 68 feet from Point "A"; thence easterly on a course parallel with the north line of said Wolverton parcel (78-248211) , and its prolongation 735 feet , more or less , to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the southwest, having a radius of 30 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 40 feet, more or less, to a point on the west line of Amador Plaza Road; thence northerly along said west line of Amador Plaza Road 130 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. • ALT. 1 l'414 74 Z Proposed Street Right-of-Way SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD BEZWEEN AMADOR PLAZA ROAD AND REGIONAL STREET All that certain real property situated in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the west line of Amador Plaza Road on the south line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Enea Plaza recorded December 19, 1980, as Instrument No. 80-224805, Records of Alameda County; thence northerly along said west line of Amador Plaza Road 167 feet, more or less, to a point easterly of the prolongation of the southern line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Robert T. and Betty J. Wolverton recorded December 20, 1978, as Instrument No. 78-248211, Records of Alameda County, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING for this description; thence continuing northerly along said west line of Amador Plaza Road to a point 68.00 feet north measured at right angles to said south line (78-248211) and its prolongation; thence westerly parallel with said south line and its prolongation a distance of 775 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Golden Gate Drive; thence leaving said centerline, on a course deflecting 5.6 degrees to the right 180 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 266.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 145 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 334.00 feet; thence along the arc of said reverse curve 180 feet, more or less, to a point on the east line of that certain parcel of land described in the deed to Peter B. Bedford recorded November 21, 1982, as Instrument No. 82- 193550, Records of Alameda County, said point hereon referred to as Point "A", lying South 4 feet, measured at right angles to, the prolongation of the south line of an existing warehouse lying on said Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence westerly on a course parallel with said south line of the existing warehouse 330 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the southeast, having a radius of 332.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 125 feet, more or less; thence southwesterly on a course tangent to the previous curve 130 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 266 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 120 feet, more or less, to a point on the south line of said Bedford parcel (82-193550); thence on a course tangent to the previous curve along said south line (82- 193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to the east line of Regional Street; thence leaving said south line (82-193550) southerly along said east line of Regional Street to a point 68.00 feet south, measured at right angles to said south line (82-193550); thence in an easterly direction parallel with said south line (82-193550) a distance of 165 feet, more or less, to ATTACHMtni FAO(UM. ROAD A f r, 3 LeepAt. DESCC 4?flON the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 334.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 90 feet, more or less; thence northeasterly on a course tangent to the previous curve, 130 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 268.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 80 feet, more or less, to a point 68.00 feet south of, measured at right angles to, the prolongation of the south line of said existing warehouse lying within the Bedford parcel (82-193550) ; thence easterly parallel with said prolongation 330 feet, more or less, to a point south 64.00 feet from Point "A", at the beginning of a tangent curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 266.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 142 feet, more or less, to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of 334.00; thence along the arc of said reverse curve 175 feet, more or less; thence southeasterly 183 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Golden Gate Drive, said point lying west of the prolongation of the southern line of said Wolverton parcel (78-248211) ; thence easterly along said prolongation of said southern line (78-248211) a distance of 778 feet, more or less, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALT. L CITY OF±PUBLIt1 PA Nc, • ENVIRONMENTAL' ASSESSMENT FORM, INZEf iM (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.) . Based on the project information submitted in Section 1 General Data, the Planning Staff • will use Section 3, Initial Study, to determine whether a Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report is required. : • SECTION 3. INITIAL STUDY - - - to be completed by the PLANNING STAFF Name of Project or Applicant: DUBLIN BOULEVARD PARALLEL ROAD . l A.. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING-Description of project site before the project, including information on: topography; soil stability;plants and animals;historical, cultural, and . scenic aspects; existing structures;and use of structures INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL'AREAS. ' 1/2 OF PROJECT SITE IS DEVELOPED AS PARKING & DRIVEWAYS. THE OTHER 1/2 . IS UNIMPROVED LAND. Description of surrounding properties, including information on: plants and animals; • historical, cultural, and scenic aspects; type and intensity of land use;and scale or development. DEVELOPED AREAS WITH COMMERCIAL RETAIL & OFFICE AS WELL AS ' WAREHOUSE. NO SIGNIFICANT NATURAT FEATURES SI1(H AS_PLANTS ANTMALS. TOPO- . GRAPHY, ETC., EXIST IN PROJECT AREA. . B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS-Factual explanations of cl1 answers except"no"are re-. quired on attached sheets. . . • ' �7 IMPACTS SCALE OF DISAC2 1 NO C}.?LI 1ED YES UNJc.NC N NO 1 • , a I t o IE. t lF . oIc, IoI.;7 I` ll2. 1 i—L 1.0 WATER 1.1 Hydrologk goloneo Will construction of the project alter the hydro- X logic balance? 1.2 Ground Water Will the project affect the quality or quantity of X ground water supplies? 1.?Depth to Water Table Will the rare of water withdrawal change the depth X or gradient of the waver table? 1.1 Drainage and Ctiannel Form Will consinicrion impede the natural drainage pattern cause or alteration of scream channel form? X 1.5 Sedimentotion Will construction in on area result in major sediment X Influe into adjacent water bodies? ' 1.6 Flooding Will there be ri.t.of lass of life or property due X tto flooding? I A-5 ATTACNI�E =, • COMPONENT 'vACtS SCE ikOF IMPACT • NO QUALIFIED YES UNKNCJ 7N • NO f ii t . I p I to a1 1 I� H . pi1o1� - L 1 1.7 Water Qaality Does drinking worer supply foil to meet,rote and x I federal standards? Will sewage be inoieg•ntely oecommedated and k • • treated? — Will receiving water fnil to meat local,,t..•o and I federal standard,? X 1 • - Will ground voter suffer contamination by cora:a • seepoys,intrusion of salt or polluted rester from adjaceet water bodies or from another cnnsnrirntcd c. • • ogoifer? ,__— . 2.0 AIR • • 2.1 Air Pollution, Will there be generation and disper of polluranrs . by project relored activities or in prof r.irr to t!:e • • project which will exceed rate ro rat;-...-.a a. - goolity standards? •. 2.2 Wind Alteration Will structure and terrain impede proscilirc wind flow coming channeling along certain corn-s-s or X obstruction of wind movements? • - . 3.0 EARTH V • 3.1 Slope Swbiliry Are there potential danger related to:!ape failcren? X _ 3.2 Foundation Support Will there be risk to life or property',cease of excessive deformation of esoterials? X F • • 3.3 Consolidation Will there be risk to life or property hecmne of • excessive consolidation of foondati-,r mnte•ial,? 3.4 Subsidence Is there risk of major ground subsidence ossoc feted k . with the project? } 3.5 Seismic Activity Is there risk of damage or loss rewriting from earth- k quoke activity? Vt_V 3.6 Liquefaction Will the project cause or be exposed In liquefaction s • of soils in slopes or under foundari.Vns? 3.7 Erodibiliy ' Will there be substantial loss of soil des to vn- X . erection practices? • 3.8 Permeability Will the permeability of soils assoc-at u!with the project present adverse conditions relative to de- X velopment of wells? . 3.7 Unique Fentores Will any unique geological features bo dammed • or destroyed by project ootioiries? k 3,10 Mineral Resources Are there geologic deposits of potential corercinl . voice close to the project?• X S c 4.0 PLANTS AND ANIMALS . • 4.1 Plant and Animal Species Are there rare or endangered species present? )r j Arc there species preent which are particularly • susceptible to impact from human activity? It Is there vegetation present,,the toss of which will "_A . deny food or habitat to important wildlife species? �( 1- Arc there nuisance species of plant or orimals Inc • which conditions will be improved by the project? \ } 4.2 Vegetative Community Types Are there any unusual populations of pivots shot may k be of scientific interest? Are there vegetative community tyre,which .a _ 1 particularly susceptible to Itnpoct fromhu.mw eetivity? vl Are there major trees or major vegrtntico that will 1 1 1 ho ei•venely nffer.ted by thn project? " Are thorn ve3sratfva r.nmmunity types r-e-ers.tun loos • • of which will deny fnpd or habit°•to i- c, 41d16r k, or too seheentint nums.�-or;- .c c°'.mi:�^-- 4.3 Diversity I,there subsrontinl diversity in the n-t••-d,,,,.nil-/ as reflected in the nomSrr and type of plrwt or noise,' species present or the three-dimensinooi orrce,-r.en: of pioot specie,present? • A-6 . , • ' 0.00-. . • . , •_ • compoNENT IMPACTS s ,E OF IMPACF • . NO QUALIFIED YES UNKNOWN NO I . , • I pl 1 I • ,E, 1 r, • 0 • 5.0 FACILITIES AND SERVICES . . 5.1 Educotional Facilities Will projected enrollments adversely effect the ex- . • . fisting or reposed facilities in terms of spacing for oll activities,Including classrooms,recreational areos,end staffing needs? X ' Will the project insect the pupil/teacher ratio so I I as to impede the learning process? is the mho.'located such that it presents a hardship lose portion of the enrollment in terms of hovel time, s, • distance,or safety hazards? A. • 5.2 Commercial Facilities Will there be on inadequate supply of and access to X commercial facilities for the project? . 1 5.3 LiquId Waste Disposal Are provisions for sewage capacity inadequate for the needs of the project without exceeding quality • standards? X _ • Will the project be exposed to nuisances and odors associated with wostewoter treatment plants? X 5.4 Solid Waste Disposal Is there inadequate provision for disposal of solid wastes generated by the project? X 5.5 Water Supply Is there inodequote quantity or quality of water supply to meet the needs of the project? 1 1 5.6 Storm Water Drainage Will stone water drainage be inadequate to prevent downstream flooding and to meet Federal State end x • local standards? 5.7 Police Will the project's additional population,facilities, or other features generate on increase in police services, or create a police Fracard? X. . I' 5.6 Fire Will the project's additional population,facilities, . or othm features generate en increase in fire services X or creole o fire horard? 5.9 Recreation Will the project have inadequate facilities to meet ' the recreational needs of the residents? . MA 5.10 Cultural Facilities Will cultural facilities be onovalloble to the project residents? NA . • 6.0 TRANSPORTATION 6.1 Transportation Facilities Are the troffic demonds on adjacent roads cur'rently • at or above capacity? If net,will the traffic gen- , crated by the project cause the adjacent roads to • reach er exceed capacity? X ?(...." Are the other transportation facilities which serve the I 1 • project inadequate to accommodate the project's x 1 1 .i • I travel demands? 1 sl 6.2 Circulation Conflicts Will design of the project Of conditions in the surround- II, ins oreo increase accidents doe to circulation conflich? X .. 6.3 Rood Sorely end Design Will project residents and users be exposed to increased . • accident risks dun to roadway and street design or lack x, of treffie controls? ... 7.0 HEALTH . ' • 7.1 Odors Will the project be exposed to or generate nay intense X odors? 1 7.2 Crowding and Density Will the residents and users be exposed to crowding or X 1 • high density in their physical living environment? 1 7.3 Nuisances Will the project be exposed to or generate factors that may be considered es nuisances? X 7.4 Structural Sorely Will design and proposed construction techniques foil ' . ' to meet stole and local building codes? X 1 8.0 NOISE 1 1 8.1 Noise Levels Will the project be exposed to er generate adverse X noise levels? 1 0.2 Vibrations Will the project be exposed to vihrotinns annoying to I , 1 ., humans? X t . t , . _ . . A-7. • - • • COMPONENT ---• IMPACIS , '-',SCALE OF IMPACr . • ...._ NO QUALIFIED YES UNKNCWN NO I vl i I 6 p o 1 _. 9.0 COMMUNITY CHARACTER ' • 9.1 Community Organization Will the project disrupt on existing set of . orgonientions or group,within the community? 9.2 WINLyenelty and Diversity Will the project change the character of the . community in terms of distribution or concentration y of income,ethnic,housing,or oge group? L 9.3 Community Stability and Will the project be exposed tn or generote on • • • Physical Conditions area of poor stability and phfsicol conditions? • ' • 10.0 VISUAL QUALITY 10.1 Views Will residents of the surrounding ore"be adversely x • affected by views of or horn the project? i • Will the project residents be adversely affected by — views or or horn the surrounding area?• X d 10.2 Shade, Will the project be exposed to or generate excessive shodows? X • 11.0 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL • • RESOLKCES • . - . • . 11.1 Historic and Cultural Will the project involve the destruction or alter- v Resources alien of o historic resource? /\ . Will the project result in isolation of o historic • ,05040Ce from its surrounding environment? . • Will the project introduce physical,visual,audible or atmospheric elements thnt ore not in character with x • a historic resource or its setting? 11.2 Archaeological Sites Will the project involve the destruction or aileron. , and Structures of on archaeological relource% X ' Will the project result in is-elation of an archaeologicol . resource? X Will the project;nue:dace physical,visual,audible or atmospheric elements that are not in character with an orchoeological resource or its setting? X 12.0 ENERGY 12.1 Energy Requirements Are there potential problems with the supply of , energy required for the project? X ' Will the energy requirements exceed the capacity . • . of the service utility company? X Will there be a net increase in energy coed for the project compered to the no project a Iternetive? X 12.2 Conservation Measures Does the project planning and design fail to include ovollebic energy conserention measures? /X 1.— e i 13.0 LAND USE • .-. • 13.1 Site Hozords Do conditions of the site,proposed site development, . or surrounding oreo create potentially hazardous situ- , rions?13.2 Physical Threat. Will the project or the surrounding area create o feelin• • of insecurity and physicol threat amoral the residents and users? 13.3 Sanitary Londfill Will the project be exposed to structurnt chemge, noise,air,or sof..oral wound re,tee pollution ,other nuisnners ounciatel with a sanitary landfill? 13.4 Waterways Will the project effect en existing wCtCr,roy through filling,dredging,dro;rdng,culverting,coste dis- • chore.,loss of visual quality or other land use prectices? • • A-8 • • COMPONENT• ..�ACI'S SCR OF IMPACT • • NO QUALIFIED YES UNENC`AN . I 1 1E • 11 15 LAND USE Will the project affect the X use of property which would - result in impacts to general plans or local • ordinances? • Other.Environmental Camponentr. • C. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE S TFIED NO NO -YrS UN?4\OWN . (1) Does the project have the potential to degrade the . quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish cr wildlife species, cause a X fish or wildlife population to drop below self- - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare cr endangered plant or animal . or eliminate important examples of the major periods - or California history cr prehistory? • (2) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental X goals? . (3) Does the project have impacts which ore individually •limited but cumulateively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where X • the impact on each resource is relatively small, b-it . where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) (4) Does the project have environmental effects which X will cause substantial adverse effects on human - beings, either directly or indirectly? A-9 • • D. MITIGATION MEASURES - Discussion of the ways to mitiga`e the significant effects identified, if any: -Proride o4 . 'N(�-� tTkl -51 k- 2 -r< _ j nAptific hi l',C?NQ.IL SY RyajilrY_ • E. DETERMINATION - On the basis of this initial evaluation: • • rgl The City of Dublih finds that there will not be any significant effect. The par- ticular characteristics of this project and the mitigation measures incorporated into the design of the project provide the roctual basis for the finding. A NEGATIVE . • DECLARATION tS -QUIRED. n The City of Dublin finds that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED** • • Signature and 441(.Aek-e...24- l• • 25_4 Name and title: {Z--rl(,e- Ls. e l,.Icr, DiP-EGTO -- • • • • • • • • **NO Where a project is revised in response to an Initial Study so that po`a: tial adverse effects are mitigated to a point where no_ significant environmental effects would occur, a • revised Initial Study will he prepared and a Negative Declaration will be required i Ns`ead of an EIR. A-1 n . . . ,. -.-. May 25, 1988 PARALLEL ROAD SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD (REGIONAL STREET TO AMADOR PLAZA ROAD) INITIAL STUDY B. Environmental Impacts - Factual Explanations This project is to establish a plan line for a road parallel to and southerly of Dublin Boulevard between Regional Street and Amador Plaza Road. Three alternatives were examined for the project. Alternatives 1 and 3 are assessed in detail in this initial study. Alternative 2 is discussed more generally due to the environmental constraints which would make the project undesirable. The attached exhibit shows all three alternatives. Unless otherwise indicated, discussion of impacts refers to both Alternatives 1 and 3. 2.1 Air Pollution Temporary construction-related air quality impacts will occur by increasing dust, especially if existing paved areas need to be removed. Construction techniques should include watering exposed areas to reduce dust, especially during windy periods. Project will improve traffic circulation in the vicinity which will result in fewer idling vehicles, having a positive benefit to local air quality. 5.2 Commercial Facilities Project will improve access to commercial properties. 6.1 Transportation Facilities Traffic demands on vicinity roads and intersections are projected to approach the design capacity, offering Levels of Service D or E. This project will help alleviate some of that congestion. 11.2 Archaeological Sites and Structures Much of the project site has been disturbed with no evidence of archaeological resources. Occasionally, resources are discovered in previously disturbed areas. Project will include condition that construction will be halted in the event that archaeological resources are discovered in order that a qualified archaeologist can examine the find. 13.5 Land Use The project involves the acquisition of property currently used for parking and driveways. In one case (APN 941-1500-47-2 Unisource), parking will be reduced below the amount that is required per the Variance and Conditional Use Permit for Unisource (PA 85-024) and zoning requirements for - 1 - n a warehouse. Zoning normally would require 300 spaces; however, the Variance/Conditional Use Permit specifies 187 spaces, with annual review to determine if additional spaces should be provided up to 236 spaces. The project would remove 122 existing spaces, leaving 65 spaces. Areas allocated for the additional 49 future parking spaces are not affected by this project. The project will also result in reduced back-up space for the truck loading and parking area for this same parcel. Currently, 121 feet is available. The resulting 110 feet is the minimum back-up required for 55- foot tractor-trailers. The largest trucks currently using the site do not exceed 55 feet in length. The zoning and Site Development Review (PA 83-069) for APN 941-1500-44 (Orchard Supply Hardware and others) requires 619 spaces. This plan line would remove 69 spaces for this property. The Downtown Specific Plan indicates that this area had a peak parking demand for 26% of the spaces provided. Even if all of the 242 parked cars identified in the survey were on this property, the peak demand would be only about 45%. The parking that will be removed is used primarily for employees. Upon construction of the road, they will be displaced to parking at the front of the building. This reduction in available parking is not considered significant. The new road will provide a landscaped walkway, thus meeting one of the goals of the Downtown Plan to provide more landscaped areas among paved surfaces. The project will also limit access to the rear of the building containing Ross, Krause's, Levitz, and others. Three doors on the east side of the rear of this building are for pedestrian use and were not designed as truck loading/unloading areas. The proposed roadway location would limit the use of the doors to pedestrian use only. Loading for the Ross and Krause's stores would have to be from the front of the building. With the project, the Levitz customer pick-up, with a roll-up door, can be used for pick-up and deliveries, although vehicles must park parallel to the building and cannot back into the opening (only smaller trucks can currently back up to the 12+ foot high opening). The changes to access to the rear of the building are not considered significant adverse environmental impacts, no mitigation is required. Alternative 1 This alternative would result in the separation of two properties currently under one ownership (Woolvertons). Crown Chevrolet on the northern parcel would not be able to expand their operation directly to the southern parcel if this project is approved. A resulting parcel of 1.4+ acres would be created. This size is sufficient to accommodate development of a commercial or office use, as designated in the Downtown Specific Plan. The separation of two lots under one ownership because of a public taking may be eligible for severance compensation. The property owner would have to demonstrate the loss in value of the property to receive such - 2 compensation. This potential loss of value is not specifically an environmental impact but should be included in final project land acquisition considerations. Alternative 3 This alternative would result in the splitting of one buildable area into two smaller pieces. The resulting pieces of 1.06+ and 1.29+ acres can develop with commercial and/or office uses; however, it is preferable to have a larger area for greater development flexibility. State Law requires compensation to a property owner when a public taking results in the severing of a property. The need for compensation must be evaluated by the public agency effecting the taking. Alternative 3 would require about 16,500 square feet of BARTD vacant property. This property is planned to be used as a parking lot to support a park-and-ride facility and possibly a future BART station. 16,500 square feet could provide about 40 parking spaces. As the property is currently vacant, there is no impact to existing land use and no mitigation beyond compensation for property acquisition is required. - 3 - i t 1I ^ 1 1 iu 3AIHQ 311/9 N301O ) / Q >- f O n QJ ILI J < J co N I0. ' ' -I e Q -- N CT Q F- -cl N e I ii\.:i:-.: cc Z 1 :i} a Q ' 1.- a cc 02 DO iAi 1 E l -1--}1 i 1 ..1 t N • —"I... I a o o0 O 4 0 w J a 1 —1 0 U a 1 N ¢� o O N = j U p Lti I —I i 1 1 ., i < N N CC 'Vl ; I 7 1 F"''' 11.Mi: 1 . 4.1.16............ :::::ty::: L • [! : ' 133d1S IYNOI031.1 1 /'mot i I I 1 g 4 t-- c4 o � Z 3AIda 9J.V N3a�0!D < J ill 01. d A. ;. ° Q au 3 i 0L.IV.....:.:6-.. .)6.,.... Q x p. OG 2 111 m A J 1 ' ■ I o I I v C 0 W O 0 k a 1 m } o i co 1 coI CC III II I . ,_.-i Ili \ \ .s,s-,.:::,-71,Tre7":17 V/Y./_1. .'I:1i7 :/ .''--s<.s 1�j 1.1 ./sIs/ } i/`I.1.`s',i I I j —,› I,il,`1, / 1 1 Q o 7 • . 1 EE I I—M Lam.. o W s i I V O I 1 1 1331:11S 1VNOIO31:1 . s t ,. -- .....�._...._�_�..w.«.y:.�-...�.�.u,,.�t...wx+e�-..,vmx,,a, aa ::49+�ttCe T..,w:��As+�'�n.:;�f'.;a+�r-.,"3.4#:�._� _.. #'g,. �• F" ',c Development Services ^ CITY OF DUBLIN Planning/Zoning 829-4916 P.O. Box 2340 Building & Safety 829-0822 Dublin, CA 94568 Engineering/Public Works 829-4927 NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR: PARALLEL ROAD SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD (Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road) (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. ) LOCATION: New road located approximately midway between Dublin Boulevard and I-580 between Regional Street and Amador Plaza Road PROPONENT: City of Dublin DESCRIPTION: Plan line for a new road with a 68—foot cross section at the above location. FINDINGS: The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. INITIAL STUDY: The initial study is available with a brief discussion of the following environmental components: Air pollution, transportation facilities, archaeology, and land use. MITIGATION MEASURES: See attachment. PREPARATION: This Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Dublin Planning Staff, (415) 829-4916. 4\ SIGNATURE: I DATE:11,4,,,,,t,i_ Hzs, cgs8 Laurence L. Tong, Plan ,_ Director 'PA 2A u.t"'L.p...olthri PARALLEL ROAD SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD (Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road) Mitigation measures included in project to eliminate impacts or reduce impacts to a level of insignificance. Land Use Additional parking shall be provided on-site for APN 941-1500-47-2. Annual review of the number of employees and parking demand will determine how many spaces are needed, to a maximum indicated below. The additional parking can be accomplished as described below (see also Figure 1). 1. Restripe driveway along west side of building to provide 90° parking and a drive aisle (net gain of 12 spaces). 2. Build new parking area west of building (47 spaces). 3. Restripe front area to preserve 17 standard size spaces and 5 handicapped sized spaces. 4. Provide the parking spaces shown on the variance permit at the rear of the property as expansion parking (49 spaces). 5. Encourage a 7,200+ square foot property exchange between this property and the BART property to the east. The exchange will furnish an area of sufficient dimensions to provide 42 spaces, plus will provide the BART property with direct street frontage on the new road. The total 122 spaces which will be removed as a result of this project can be replaced with 108 spaces, with an additional 42 available if the property exchange is executed (total of 150). The City is currently preparing an ordinance that would provide a conforming status to properties rendered non-conforming due to a City action such as condemnation. If this ordinance is enacted, it should be applied to this project. If a new business wants to locate at the Unisource site, the parking will have to be re-evaluated, considering that the parking may be less than the standard requirement due to the loss of available parking area. Appropriate compensation for splitting property or separating properties shall be made to affected property owners. • • L J ) i 13 DUBLIN tlLVD. e , , =j -y = t i� 0 o a n o __ r1 r -_ 1 1N - a __ -- o)WOoLV'EKToN __ — BEDFoRD , SARTD W 0 L 0 D LII I 1 • a I I ALA.co. rLODD CONT. RRa1a1 WAY 1..1180 . PARALLEL ROAD e ,w aw j SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD, w aoo artr BETWEEN REGIONAL STREET AND AMADOR PLAZA ROAD APRIL nw )( 15TIN6 PA F.C L.S ATTACHMENT_S- Law Offices of 7020 Koll er Parkway,Suite 142 Howell&Hallgrimson Pleasanton,California 94566 Telephone 415 452 2424 A Professional Corporation R r t f l V E D Ssn3OSROt1.0 MO Sor.rn Market Street Suite 500 SA',JOS.CatAornia 95113.2303 File No M AY 0 a 1988 T4xtr ne 4082756300 1ee000 5r 408 275 0315 w213-001 DOWN PLANNING May 2, 1988 Planning Commission S'eien L Radom'nor City of Dublin Cs:nP Hoaeel 6500 Dublin Blvd. .coe op CC'oaco E•c Prong Suite 205 P.oerR Branco Dublin, CA 94566 Ce.CA Marion POeS=S MOP, Proposed Plan Line - New Road Parallel to Lr=,a;A Lyons Re: JareR Re,,ea and Southerly to Dublin Blvd. Loo,00ceL Loparea Agenda of May 2, 1988 Fa,e,ELe"re r.:Fac I Raney Item No. 8.2 De.a C Burgess Gcrra?ec4er Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commissioners: Aa-aLHasCn JC-n S Pasco.Jr =nr.CeR.1w On behalf of Betty Woolverton, Steve Woolverton, and D---eJMaeo Terri Costello, I am again addressing you regarding T--+nas C.Muc-a the proposed plan line south of Dublin Boulevard. .--caAr.ecn .,icy L 9rarc: We have reviewed your staff report dated May 2, Ke,nA Gccc.rn 1988, regarding the issues raised at your last Ee,3 Hare Planning Commission meeting. CapJers`r We would like to first take the opportunity to thank' you for having your staff review the alternatives to c'C---sr ro osed plan line that were raised at our c_.o�ao:.e•s the proposed Y ,eas.eca'Csl:;•a:April 4 hearing. It is unfortunate that alternative two, discussed at some length in the report, is apparently not available due to plans by CalTrans to use the same property. On the other hand, we were pleased to see that alternative three, which would have less impact on the property owners, is roughly the same cost as the proposed plan line. We again reiterate, however, that the roadway should not go through the Woolvertons' property if at all possible. It also seems clear to us that approval of a plan line at this time is premature. The need for the roadway between Golden Gate and Amador Plaza is in large part due to the proposed BART parking lot on Golden Gate Drive and it is not yet finally confirmed that BART will indeed use the property for that purpose. ATTACHMENT9eVAO Dublin Planning Commission May 2, 1988 Page 2 Secondly, the Enea property to the east has not yet had its plan reviewed pursuant to its PD Zoning. It is appropriate for the Planning Commission, in reviewing the Enea plans to decide at what point the road should cross that property and approve the development based on the appropriate placement of the road. it is possible that the Eneas and the Woolvertons could agree to a right-of-way that would have the minimum impact on both property owners in "good neighbor discussions," or that the Planning Commission might find that our proposed route could be consistent with a development on the Enea property. If it turns out, however, that there is no acceptable single roadway between Regional Street and Amador Plaza Road, the staff should go back and look at alternative methods of moving traffic between these cul-de-sacs. Perhaps one street is not the only or even the most effective way of creating the needed traffic flow between those streets. The connection between Golden Gate and Amador Plaza, for instance, need not line up with the front of the BART property. An access from the mid to rear of the BART parking lot could traverse some more southerly route. In summary, it is unnecessary for your commission to make the hard decision now as to a plan line, when the only party truly affected by its placement is the owners of the Woolverton parcel. The Eneas have yet to receive approval for design of their property to the east. BART has yet to finalize its development plans to the west. If your Commission feels strongly, however, that it is now appropriate to establish a plan line, the proposed negative declaration is inadequate. The environmental impacts caused by the establishment of a road from Regional Street to Amador Plaza Road will have significant impacts on the properties on both Golden Gate and Amador Plaza. They include the Dublin Planning Commission May 2, 1988 Page 3 additional traffic from Regional Street and the impact of BART traffic in and around the area. At a minimum a traffic study should be done to measure those impacts so that your recommendation to the City Council can be based on appropriate data. Respectfully submitted, HOWELL & HALLGRIMSON B e4 Y rvey E. evine HEL/alp OD ?� ��c nett Fiaza �'� 7450 DUBLIN BOULEVARD DUBLIN,CALIFORNIA 94566 F��t� 1UJ�4 �\� PHONE(4151 828-4401 May 9, 1988 Planning Commission Members Dublin, California Re: Proposed Plan Line - New Road Parallel to and Southerly of Dublin Boulevard (Between Amador Plaza Road and Regional Street. Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the above referenced Proposed Plan Line location, we would like to go on record opposing any realignment of the proposed road that would alter its current location across our property. Since completing our irrevocable dedication agreement with the City of Dublin, we have spent a significant amount of time and money planning for the second phase of our shopping center. Due to its proximity from Dublin Boulevard, we feel a 3 Acre parcel would lend more flexibility for site development than two separate parcels consisting of a 1 and 2 Acre parcel divided by the proposed road. One larger parcel would allow for a larger development and increase our chances of attracting an anchor tenant which is critical to the successful development of this property because of its location off the Dublin Boulevard thoroughfare. In conclusion, we oppose any realignment of the proposed roadway across our property for the above referenced reasons. nc r ly, ,/) „.„-___ J n G. nea JGE/kh cc: Robert S. Enea ATTACHMENT_IO - PAIM.IEG Soma 74- Law Offices ri t 7020 R inter Parkway,Suite 142 Howell & HallgrirmJn Pleasant, California 94566 Telephone 415 462 2424 A Professional Corporation San Jose Office: 60 South Market Street.Suite 900 San Jose.California 95113-2303 File r•lo Telephone 408 275 6300 W 213-0 O 1 Te!ecopier 408 275 0315 May 16, 1988 Planning Commission City of Dublin 6500 Dublin Blvd. Suite 205 Dublin, CA 94566 Steven L.Hallgnmsor. Dixon R.Howell Joseph P.DiCiuccio Re: Planning Commission Meeting May 16, 1988 ErcWong Item No. 9 . 1 Roger R.Brandon David A.Marion Howard S.Miller Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commissioners: Linda M.Lyons Jane P Relyea On behalf of Betty and Steve Woolverton, and Terri La.vrenceL.Lopardo Costello, ine I am responding to the PlanningStaff's RonaldI Raney P g Ronald I.Ramey report on tonight's agenda. At the May 2 Planning David C.Burgess Commission meeting, Alternative 3 was selected as Donna Becker ch the preferred alternative byeach of the PlanningJohnark S.Psco John S.Pasco.Jr Commissioners. Planning staff was directed to Jo Ann DeRuvo modify the resolution adopting the Plan Line, and to DanielJ.Mash Thomas D.Murtha prepare the appropriate legal description allowing Patricia A.Welch for selection of Alternative 3 for the Plan Line. Nancy L Brandt Staff has redrafted the legal description for Kenn A.Goodwin Jeffrey B.Hare Alternative 3 . Lawrence R Jensen Jar O'Neal In its report, staff continues to argue for Alternative 1, despite your Commission's preference, and your closing of the public hearing. We believe Dfcd H ei Bowers cwers Staff's action is inconsistent with the direction of A Professional Corpera;:- your Planning Commission and unreasonable given the two public hearings already devoted to this subject. We would hope that, without further debate, your Commission will adopt the resolution attached to the Staff Report, inserting the number three (3) in the blank on the last line of the resolution. If, however, additional discussion is to be made a part of the record, you should renotice the public hearing and provide an opportunity for all those who wish to make comments. We would oppose any attempt, this evening, to reopen this matter for any purpose other than adoption of the Alternative 3 Plan Line. Very truly yours, HOWELL & HALLGRIMSON By Harvey . Levine ATTACHMENT J HEL/alp PARAuxrc. Rom) . .......v+.w-.,.......a,nwr.-+w..rro.-.ay.e.a6�:Ra-w.,xvL+.fr•-y..,.a:sa -..:..nCw . f ..3.;..it. 4 .«.IdT.mw " _ ... .:,.- -,ST'.4vx.-3r r.;.-.- .. .i,95'1C^.3.'-..,'s'd'L..]'is2R..A:• .._.. '. - n CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 6, 1988 TO: Planning Commission If FROM: Planning Staffl:1? SUBJECT: PA 88-015 Kaufman and Broad Special Easement Sign Conditional Use Permit GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit request for a Special Easement Sign located to identify Kaufman & Broad's Administrative Offices APPLICANT: Kaufman & Broad of No. California Debra Bernard 6379 Clark Avenue Dublin, CA 94568 PROPERTY OWNER: Sleepy Hollow Investment Company No. 2 Joyce Siason 6374 Clarke Avenue #200 LOCATION: 6379 Clark Avenue ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-1401-18 PARCEL SIZE: 1.42 acres GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial/Industrial - Business Park/Industrial EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: M-1, Light Industrial District, Office Uses SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Office Uses, M-1 South: Alamo Creek and I-580 East: Office Uses, M-1 West: Office Uses, M-1 ZONING HISTORY: C-2419: On May 15, 1972, the Alameda County Zoning Administrator approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of an office building in the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District V-5727: On May 15, 1972, the Alameda County Zoning Administrator approved a Variance allowing the creation of two lots without frontage on an approved street. COPIES TO: Applicant 8.a. Finer ITEM NO. File PA 88-015 n I'N S-635X: On January 27, 1978, the Alameda County Planning Director approved the construction of two office buildings in the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District. PA 88-016: On May 20, 1988, the Planning Director approved a Site Development Review request for an on-site freestanding sign to identify Kaufman & Broad's administrative offices. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-87.10(w) of the Dublin Sign Regulations defines a Special Easement Sign as "a business sign located off-site from the premises. The sign has been designed to advertise where said premises are located on a parcel of land without direct access or frontage on an improved public right- of-way and where the two premises involved are interconnected by a traversable vehicular roadway which is subject to a non-revocable, non-exclusive recorded vehicular access easement." Section 8-87.60 states that special easement signs can be considered through the Conditional Use Permit process. Section 8-94.0 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or peformance standards established for the district in which it is located. Section 8-94.4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be valid only for a specified term, and may be made contingent upon the acceptance and observance of specified conditions, including but not limited to the following matters: a) substantial conformity to approved plans and drawings; b) limitations on time of day for the conduct of specified activities; c) time period within which the approval shall be exercised and the proposed use brought into existence, failing which, the approval shall lapse and be void; d) guarantees as to compliance with the terms of the approval, including the posting of bond; e) compliance with requirements of other departments of the City/County Government. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project has been found to be Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Section 15311, Class 11(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the June 6, 1988, hearing was published in The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. ANALYSIS: This application involves a request from Kaufman & Broad for a Conditional Use Permit for a Special Easement Sign. The sign is presently located off the subject site, on the property located at 6375 Clark Avenue. 6375 Clark Avenue fronts directly on the street, while the Kaufman & Broad -2- _-� n n site is located directly behind (south) of this site (see Attachment 1). This sign was identified through the City's sign survey as an illegal sign. The Applicant is attempting to legalize the sign through this Conditional Use Permit process. Special easement signs are designed to advertise businesses without direct access or frontage on an improved right-of-way. Said sign must be located on a portion of a traversable vehicular roadway which is subject to a non-revocable, non-exclusive recorded access easement. The properties involved must be interconnected by this easement. At this time, Kaufman & Broad has not been able to provide legal evidence of the existence of an easement serving the subject sites. Staff has made Kaufman & Broad aware that they must provide evidence of such easement (by providing either a title report, a property profile, or a recorded deed showing the easement) prior to a decision being made on this application. If there is an easement, Staff may recommend conditional approval of the request. There is one potential issue involved with approving this sign. Kaufman and Broad was recently granted approval of a Site Development Review request for a freestanding sign to be located on the property they occupy. The sign regulations only allow one freestanding sign to identify a site. Kaufman and Broad will have to determine which sign they would like to keep. The other sign would be required to be removed as a condition of approval of this project. If there is no easement, Staff would recommend that this application be denied and the sign be removed from the site located at 6375 Clark Avenue. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this application to the meeting of June 20, 1988, in order to give Kaufman & Broad an opportunity to provide the appropriate documents. These documents should be submitted to Staff no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 10, 1988, in order to make the June 20th hearing date. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this item to the next regularly scheduled meeting of June 20, 1988 in order to give the Applicant the opportunity to provide evidence of the existence of a non- revocable, non-exclusive recorded access easement serving the two sites in question. ATTACHMENTS: Background Attachment: 1. Site Plan showing the location of the subject property, the location of Kaufman & Broad's Administrative Offices and the proposed location of the Special Easement Sign. -3- ....... --, MD POSED SPE•cIAL•EA SE tA.Egr SIGN L.DLATIO N • ;AP 1.110 It .AP,12: i 11111 I gUIV. .1','IpliFitro litp.,,;zi 1 . • • : 4. \V.:.,,,.. .. *_ ii•' I: ' Pt ;mg _,A,,;...:,,/, '.. •.': .. ..,N -,- 1 Ili 1 i illii ililnii•r: -at ocii „lir otirir,11,1 , \ ... ,c-_, -,--•,..,. : • ,1 i, 713 1 t` P' ;Ft 1 ..... A. .... / i. • .:,d 1 I lea- 4 1/1 li.fr' t i 1 4'14 1 • 1 •11\ ' ' \/ '-'---t"-- /4.1•1;‘.., .., --.....„ I) 1 ( I- gqi. ,., s\ • , 7 ../. .' :".•••1/4,...,4•••,,„.. ----ii.....1 '''. ..,•••,," . ----it,./' ., A •1A (0-7'27 5. .r.-',Z,,"' 7212, . .. 4.:/ ^ ,,•,,,,, .- • \ z . • . , \ • r : 1 I 1 I ; . • :t:--r' _.,;?-•.1, I I i 1 I 1 --% - ' .!--,•::--'...-. -'. 1 • r.,-, • .--..--i...-,_-;----:;.--.‹.... 1 + .-<+- .-- •• . ( t.- / A. 4"-'2 5',! • • i 1i-----t r -) -' -'-: — "tk gigio-- -:-----:-'-'1 IrD Ittr'J • , 4.x - .4; ,. I . A . . , ,./,. - •,\..„,, - / \<. ;1., •r-- hi'c 1 i - V ' < # - • r' -, i , -ii ---, • ... .._._ --,.. „, .?;----•./1' --7.-',f 1:1- ti" 4t<,,k • . p: ri 9 r z - s'i.• z -Ille• ' tr'.' I • 1 L..._ 1 :,- \ .x . '. • .•,>. ss.)p: r . r\>;-: •. • „ i 1 .F— I --] ,e—, 4'. ,_._-el '' 4.‘-f;•'' ez,. i _.. - - ,1 F.1 re• la ,•7 11.,;;J - \%0.,_4.., , \ ,N\_ k. 1 .ii , ffe r.p„:1 .I r:ri I '' i — • .. ,. • , ....1 . ...„ - , K.la.. . y 1, I i- 1 I -' "....>s r) , • , ' ; . 1--17-7,1s"IL ,....‘" - - . - ?..,12. . ,. -4- L ",/4- OFFKES / [ :., ' IL5 ----------- '. g .1; - ---., .i .1. I) i ri PI -1 no LI ,. „,..... ... :o : , i , ...4 . ' i --- 6 g .. .1* -7Villi•iit, Ki •; - -I- . -t :,, ,, 4 - — -----••• ••••,-•••• ---• 4 ' -;,Vt.— I 1: • 4, ... .1.1- -,--.. „ _.,/-- -11 ... r . 4--:_st I It.-' • .,C 6 -r 17 4 _it- ; --1 .• T. . .--, , gm ,,,,,, t-qt.;- 1 OFPK.E 1.1.111r' : ' ‘,"- -' - 1 it'' ,/.1 7 /I ) :0"il. sW' ' •1...-P '• -..1 1-'. Z..‘ 1.• 21 NI _ ‘i'!... 1.:''' :11‘L.bi.,.4, . " 1 1'l'_1- c rTE. 1.00 -.- ..'t / it >I rrP; hori;:KAB 1 • " •,L--1,--1-5- .....;' -4, --' ••••%.---• • •, -s- 4.`--lit 7.... 1 ',„1-141 '.. .' ' --.-. 11)1' II '! J • • _.-i r 4 Ii.4. 0 ........--T -itz " \ '- .... • • ...444 :..... L-. ::;,-::.-Lls.,-,_:_"0:,....' ....__..--2,,.....=, IL \ .i.,it . io,•....<. .•..4 ,' .11.7 is ',. ... , -', k i 1 ' --*-r-Ti---21.-- .::::._ \- \ \ " • •.• .- ' . ' •t: -, -.1' 1 "ra!.3÷ • '..'lfi. :S.... 1 ------r- •'••2-: ..-.--q,• . • . c., "--- 1 P . 1 . . . z.- - 1 .7. ii• ,%i Fp... . • 04-W:L-•-,4.,.- -•-•---•-4.2, t__-I, ',.._t _ ..1 : I -t :s,•, . •,-7,.. ,, i : r i--_-.1 ' 4,.„..,:,...-.. :. -E*. 1 -, .. --:4 AT ; ?.: • •-• 40 ,-,--- F -'.— ' \;. .>:/. ••,,...Z.7-- • i .... ; -.•.--,..... ' \ .-...•„, ' •-..... , : \ " ••,.. ' /I . /.I iii 44: . N 3- "; ••,.. • „ 0.- 4: •-;,),1 "-• • • , ..7.--: , ,, 4s 4 1 4 •rf. ' N•.;:.L'•\-•....-..- ••••4°11-,\ It ) ! "--•:._------ 'fil ti°1 •.1 ,iV,`,„4,.4, '..:', , :- 11. . 1'. 4, • .-- i /3 i., .> t.0 , 'A , .••-• _ i • .Z '' ''''''' '''''''..7 -‘--. • _I', 0 -.:' , • ;,11.. I 2/ , ...:,. 1 , ,-- •t.,-,://->•,-,_ 7•1_---i, - ...—\,•••,...........r.....- i • .- i -- -' •,..,._ -------- , i D I. ii" . fg 1 1 . 19 P. +is 1 ,. 1 iii. ! , ,,,, glill . IA k-„.._.,,,,,,i' ,skiii .. :_, •....1 : . -.- .to. .. 1-•:' `I .''•• -• 14—•---7• ' •''• Vil :: .,.- 4:i - i - -....- ••. s; ', ! i '•••:...,,:,) ---:-.;:.,-,\;-...:, II lir---i.-;--,, ••• 1,-.:-:. :',v'T Al -:' •4•.:-', ,;.;: ii ,'.'.•,:.,i'l.ilit'. .--. 1.1,....;,'F;'' :•1:',-i!;'. %.„. ... 2.7,-:=P : ::,-.,-,5,..;.<:'ift-!:'-' ATTAcHmrm .ticA.. , r + . n CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 6, 1988 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff1-413 SUBJECT: PA 88-023 Liquor Barn Site Development Review Appeal GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: Appeal of the Planning Director's action approving a Site Development Review request to remodel portions of the exterior facade of the existing Liquor Barn. APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Charles W. Smith 763 Acorn Court San Ramon, CA 94583 PROPERTY OWNER: Safeway Stores, Incorporated Non-Operating Properties 201 Fourth Street Oakland, CA 94607 Safeway Stores, Incorporated 47400 Kato Road Fremont, CA 94538 LOCATION: 6633 Dublin Boulevard ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-205-9-3 PARCEL SIZE: 13+ acres GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial/Industrial - Retail/Office and Automotive EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: C-2, General Commercial District - Retail Stores SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USE: North: M-1, Light Industrial District, Research Development and Office Uses South: C-2, Retail Commercial and Office Uses East: C-2, Automotive Sales and Service Station West: M-1, Research and Development Uses ZONING HISTORY: S-393: On 9/8/71, the Alameda County Planning Commission approved a Site Development Review request to construct a 109,000+ square foot retail store and garden shop for K-Mart. PA 83-051: On 10/17/83, the Dublin Zoning Administrator approved an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for a one-day pet vaccination clinic. COPIES TO: Applicant 8. Owner ITEM NO. File PA 88-023 /"\ PA 83-077: On 11/16/83, the Dublin Planning Director approved a Site Development Review request for a wall mounted sign for the Liquor Barn PA 83-055: On 12/6/83, the Dublin Planning Commission approved a one-day pet vaccination clinic. PA 85-015: On 3/1/85, the Dublin Planning Director approved a Site Development Review request for a freestanding sign and wall mounted signs for Pak'n Save. PA 86-008: On 1/29/86, the Dublin Planning Director approved an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for a one-day pet vaccination clinic. PA 86-027: On 5/5/86, the Dublin Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a three-day pet vaccination clinic. On 5/15/86, a member of the Dublin City Council appealed the decision of the Planning Commission. On 5/29/86, the Applicant withdrew the Application. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-95.0 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance states that the intent of Site Development Review is to "promote orderly, attractive, and harmonious development; recognize envionmental limitations on development; stabilize land values and investments; and promote the general welfare by preventing establishment of uses or erection of structures having qualities which would not meet the specific intent clauses or performance standards of this Chapter or which are not properly related to their sites, surroundings, traffic circulations, or their environmental setting. Where the use proposed, the adjacent land uses, environmental significance or limitations, topography, or traffic circulation is found to so require, the Planning Director may establish more stringent regulations than those otherwise specified for the District." Section 8-95.3 states that "The Planning Director, upon receipt of an application for Site Development Review, shall make such investigations as are necessary to determine whether or not the proposed Use or Structure conforms or may be conditioned to conform fully to the regulations for the District as herein set forth. The Planning Director may request reports and recommendations from the County Surveyor, Building Official and Health Officer, Public Works Department, other offices of the County of Alameda, or any other interested public agencies regarding matters within their jurisdiction which may be affected by the proposed use or structure." Section 8-95.7 states "Wherever a plan for the development of a Building Site has been the subject of Site Development Review as hereinabove specified and has been given final approval the use of the Building Site thereafter shall be subject to compliance with the plan in conformance to all details specified thereon and subject to all the conditions set forth in the action of approval." ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project has been found to be categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15301 Class 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines. NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the June 6, 1988, hearing was published in The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. -2- n ANALYSIS: On March 15, 1988, the Planning Department received a Site Development Review application from the Liquor Barn (represented by Charles Smith) to remodel portions of their exterior facade. On April 15, 1988, the Planning Director approved the request. On May 2, 1988, the Applicant appealed the decision to the Planning Commission. On May 13, 1988, Staff mailed a letter to the Applicant detailing additional information that would have to be submitted by May 27, 1988 in order to make this application complete and in order for the Planning Commission to consider the request. This included mailing labels to meet the legal advertising requirements, 8 1/2" x 11" transparency reductions of all plans for overhead projection and 8 1/2" x 11" black and white reductions of each plan. To this date, that information has not been submitted. Consequently, Staff recommends that this application be continued to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of June 20, 1988 in order to give the Applicant the opportunity to provide these documents. They should be submitted to Staff no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 10, 1988, in order to make the June 20th hearing date. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this item to the next regularly scheduled meeting of June 20, 1988 in order to give the Applicant the opportunity to provide the additional necessary information requested by Staff. ATTACHMENTS: Background Attachment: 1. Staff's May 13, 1988 letter to the Applicant requesting additional information. -3- CITY OF DUBLIN --� Development Services Planning/Zoning 829-4916 P.O. Box 2340 Building & Safety 829-0822 Dublin, CA 94568 Engineering/Public Works 829-4927 May 13, 1988 Charles W. Smith 763 Acorn Court San Ramon, CA 94583 Dear Mr. Smith: Since you have appealed the decision of the Planning Director regarding PA 88-023, the item must go before the Planning Commission for a decision. At this time it appears that the Planning Commission will consider your appeal at their regularly scheduled meeting of June 6, 1988. When a Public Hearing is carried out, additional information and materials from you must be provided to Staff in order to have a complete application package. Attached you will find an annotated copy of the City's General Submittal Requirements. You must provide the items circled in order to have a complete package that will allow for a Public Hearing. This information should be provided to Staff no later than May 27, 1988, in order to make the June 6th meeting. If you should have any questions please feel free to call me at 829-4916. Sincerely, Rod Barger Senior Planner RB/df cc: File PA 88-023 t-� Planning Department (415) 829-4916 6500 Dublin Blvd. Suite D Eff.: 1/84 Dublin CA 94568 Rev.: 11/87 GENERAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The numbers following each type of planning permit refers to the submittal informa- tion that must accompany each particular application. The submittal information is described in detail below. PLANNING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT Administrative Conditional Use Permit 1, 2, 4, 6, 7*, 8*, 10*, 11*, 16* Boundary Adjustment Permit . . . . 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10*, 17 Conditional Use Permit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11*, 12*, 13*, 15* General Plan Amendment 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 Planned Development - (See Planned Development Rezoning Submittal Requirements.) Rezoning 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 17 Sign 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 16 Site Development Review 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7*, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16*, 17 Subdivision - (See Subdivision Map Submittal Requirements.) Variance 1, 2, 3*, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9*, 10*, 11*, 12*, 13*, 14*, 15* Other - (Check with Planning Staff) (* These requirements may be waived for small projects; check with the Planning Department.) The submittal information shall be provided to the Planning Department. All submittal information shall be presented along with the Planning Application form, related fees, and any additional information required by the Planning Department before the application can be accepted as complete. Size Limit: Plans should be not larger than 30"x 42" trimmed. Please fold all plans into packets with each packet containing one copy of each plan. The packets should not be larger than 9" x 11" in size. • Scale: The scale used on submittal plans shall generally be at a 1/8"= 1'0" for the architectural plans, 1"- 20' for site engineering plans. Include a north arrow, ' the scale and a bar scale on all plans. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS BY NUMBER: * of Copies (Only those items related to the specific type of planning permit are to be completed.) 1. Application Form - completed and signed (1) 2. Fee/Deposit - (Set fees are non-refundable. Deposits are determined by the Planning Department with final amount based on processing time spent by Staff.) Check payable to the City of Dublin. 3. Environment Assessment Form - Section 1 (1) 4. Location Map - indicating the subject parcel(s) (1) and adjacent streets. 5. Title Report - A preliminary title report, prepared (1) within three months prior to filing the application. 6. Written statement - describing the project in detail and (10) what the reasons are for the project including the City's potential benefits and costs. OMailing Labels - A. Provide a reproduced County Assessor's parcel map (1) showing project parcel(s) outlined in red and a 300 ft. • boundary drawn from the perimeter of the project area outlined in blue. From this map, prepare a list and labels for all parcels that lie within the blue line as described below. r 3 No. of Copies tab List: Name and address of all legal owners of (1) property within 300 feet of subject property. QLabels: Complete set of typed mailing labels. (2) 0 Site Slides - Provide 35 MM color slides (transparencies) to clearly show the view of and from the project site, including neighboring development. Include a key map i indicating where the pictures were taken from and in what direction they were taken. Label the slides , accordingly. It is often desirable to take a series of overlapping slides which will show a panoramic view. imoTransparency - An 8 1/2"x 11" clear transparency (1) reduction of all plans for overhead projection. 41) Reduction- An 8-1/2"x 11" black and white reduction (1) of each plan. 11. Site Plans - Site plans of the project shall be fully (10) dimensioned and accurately drawn. The plans shall contain the following basic information unless the Planning Department determines that additional { information is necessary to properly evaluate the project. Use as many sheets as necessary. You may combine information so long as the plans are easy to read. If details are not reviewed during the Site Development Review process, they will be subject to review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. In most cases, the site plan must be prepared and signed by a licensed civil engineer, surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or building designer whose name, address and phone number must appear on the plan. The boundary and topographic survey information (showing the existing topography) must be prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor whose name, seal, and signature must appear on the sheet of plan indicating the boundary and topographic survey. For small projects, this requirement may be waived. Check with the Planning Department. Site plans shall include the following information: a) Legal Boundaries - Boundary lines, easements (with size and type called out) , right-of-ways, trails, paths, utility poles and the like. b) Topography - Topography of the land with 1-foot contour lines for land with a slope of 5% or less, and 2-foot contours for land over 5%. This contour interval may be increased for land with over 20% slope. Show faults, flood zones, and slide areas. c) Grading - Preliminary grading plan clearly showing existing and proposed contours carried a minimum of 50' beyond the project boundaries. Show direction and path of existing proposed drainage channels or facilities. Indicate building pad and finished elevations, retaining walls (with height and materials specified) . d) Streets and Lots - Proposed street layouts and lot design, off-street parking, and loading areas. This should include proposed circulation of vehicles, goods, pedestrians and bicycles. Dimension all parking, roads, and maneuvering areas. (cont. ) -2- No. of Copies e) Public Areas - Areas proposed to be dedicated or reserved for parks, trails, schools, public or quasi-public buildings, and other such uses. f) Land Use - Land uses proposed. Show the type, amount and location. Show also adjacent land use, including their general location and the height of existing structures and trees within 50'+ of the property lines. g) Trees - Species, common name, size, condition, location, and dripline of existing trees of over 12" in circumference, 24" above grade. Any trees proposed to be removed shall be so indicated along with the reason why they are proposed to be removed. • h) Buildings - All existing and proposed buildings and structures. Include their outside dimensions, height (from ground to top of roof) , location and use. Delineate each residential unit or commercial shop, and indicate unit type and size. Show trash enclosures, storage buildings and the like. Indicate setbacks and distance between buildings. i) Features - Building appurtenances and features, including balconies, decks, stairs, roof lines shown. j) Phasing - Potential phasing limits of project should be indicated and a statement provided that sets forth the manner and phasing of the installation and maintenance of parking, lighting, land-scaping, private grounds, streets, utilities and open space. 12. Landscape Plan - A preliminary landscape plan shall be (10) submitted showing major landscape structures such as Fences, walls, walks, pools, and trellises with dimensions, paving material designations, and a proposed planting plan. Approval of a preliminary landscaping plan will be subject to submittal of a final landscaping and automatic irrigation plan to be checked for conformance prior to issuance of a building permit. The preliminary landscape plan should indicate the general plant pallet that is proposed including a description of the type of plants, their rate of growth, size in 3-5 years, mature size, and container size at time of planting. Include both common and botanical names. Show the location of paths, fences and street furniture. 13. Building Elevations - (10) A. Elevations: Show all elevations with materials, colors, and dimensions specified. The purpose of such drawings is to specify the height, bulk and appearance of proposed buildings and structures. If architectural details are not reviewed during the Site Development Review process, they will be subject to review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. B. Lights: Show the location, height, size and type of exterior lights. (cont. ) -3- No. of Copies C. Features: Indicate the locations of identification signs and features, mailboxes, storage spaces, air conditioning units, transformers, utility meters, and other items that affect the exterior appearance and use of the proposed project and adjacent property. 14. Roof Plan - Roof plan showing roof slope and materials, (10) • the general size and location of all mechanical equipment and vents, ducts and other roof mounted items. 15. Floor Plan - Floor plans showing exterior doors and (10) windws and design with stairways, mechanical rooms and shared hallways indicated, so that parking and coverage calculations can be made. 16. Signs - Sign submittals are as follows: (4) A. Site Plan: Site plan, fully dimensioned showing the location and size of all freestanding, as well as wall, signs. Include the length of building frontage(s) onto a public right of way. (If building has more than one frontage, identify length of each frontage) ; B. Elevations: Fully dimensioned building elevations showing sizes and locations of existing and/or proposed wall signs (minimum scale 1/8"a 1' -0') • C. Details: Detailed drawings of all proposed signs indicating the type of letter, color scheme, cabinet colors, material specifications (minimum scale 1/4" -1' -0") . D. Inventory: A sign inventory of all signs must be submitted for any sign evaluation to include the type, description, size, height and locations of all existing and proposed signs. *The height above finish grade and dimensions of all signs shall be shown on all of the above drawings. *Area of each sign (in square feet) shall be shown on all of the above drawings. Example: Sign #1 TYPE DESCRIPTION SIZE HEIGHT LOCATION 1 Wall Sign "Antiques" 4'x6' 10' West Elevation 17. Additional Information - a) Aerial Photograph b) Perspective Sketches c) Models d) Provide typical building sections showing wall, eave, fascia and roof with roof- mounted mechanical equipment and penthouses shown. e) Other: -4- CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 6, 1988 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff + SUBJECT: PA 88-044 Marg-Ett Art & Craft Fairs - Marietta Lewis (Applicant) Dublin Plaza Shopping Center Merchants Associates (Sponsor) Conditional Use Permit. GENERAL INFORMATION PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit for two Art & Craft Fairs at the Dublin Plaza Shopping Center (July 21-24, 1988, and December 1-4, 1988). APPLICANT AND REPRESENTATIVE: Marg-Ett Art & Craft Show Attn.: Marietta Lewis 1377 Wylie Way San Jose, California Steve Heath Dublin Plaza Shopping Center Merchants Association 7233 Regional Street Dublin, California 94568 PROPERTY OWNER: Regional Street Joint Venture c/o Holvick Deregt & Koe 1230 Oakmead Parkway Sunnyvale, CA 94088 PROPERTY LOCATION AND ZONING: Dublin Plaza Shopping Center C-1; Retail Business District (APN 941-305-16 & 17-2) SURROUNDING LAND USE: The proposed Art & Craft Fairs are proposed to be located along the pedestrian walkway stretching from the Albertson Market to Mervyns Department Store, roughly centered within the Dublin Plaza Community Shopping Center. ZONING HISTORY: November 13, 1984 - Conditional Use Permit approved to operate two Art and Craft Fairs at Dublin Plaza, held November 17-20 1984, and December 13-16, 1984. July 8, 1985 - Administrative Conditional Use Permit to operate two one-day Art and Craft Fairs at Dublin Plaza Shopping Center, held July 20, 1985, and July 21, 1985. September 3, 1985 - Conditional Use Permit to operate two Art and Craft Fairs at Dublin Plaza Shopping Center, held November 2-3, 1985, and December 13-16, 1985. COPIES TO: Applicants (2) 8. t t -1- Owner ITEM NO. -`� File PA 88-044 J. Stagner r'1 r1 April 21, 1986 - Conditional Use Permit to operate two Art & Craft Fairs at Dublin Plaza Shopping Center, held July 17-20, 1986, and December 11-14, 1986. June 6, 1987 - Conditional Use Permit to operate two Art & Craft Fairs at Dublin Plaza Shopping Center held July 23-26, 1987 and December 10-13, 1987. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-61.0 of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended by City Ordinance 18-84, requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained from the Planning Commission for the operation of two seperate arts and crafts fairs, for up to four days each, per twelve month period per lot when sponsored by a Dublin based organization, for the sale of handmade or handcrafted items for sale by the original owner. Section 8-94.0 of the Zoning Ordinance states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district in which it is located. Section 8-94.4 of the Zoning Ordinance states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be valid only for a specified term, and may be made contingent upon the acceptance and observance of specified conditions, including but not limited to the following matters: a) substantial conformity to approved plans and drawings; b) limitations on time of day for the conduct of specified activities; c) time period within which the approval shall be exercised and the proposed use brought into existence, failing which, the approval shall lapse and be void; d) guarantees as to compliance with the terms of the approval, including the posting of bond; e) compliance with requirements of other departments of the City/County Government. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Categorical Exemption, Class 4(e), temporary use of land having negligible or no permanent effect on the environment. NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the June 6, 1988, hearing was published in The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings ANALYSIS: The Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to operate two Art and Craft Fairs at the Dublin Plaza Shopping Center, to be held July 21-24, 1988 and December 1-4, 1988. The Applicant's request complies with the City's adopted Ordinance relating to Arts and Craft Fairs in that the request is for two four-day fairs within a 12-month period as stipulated in the Ordinance. The request, to set up the two fairs along the pedestrian walkway area stretching from the Albertson Market to the Mervyns Department Store, is being coordinated with and sponsored by the Dublin Plaza Shopping Center Merchants Association and is not anticipated to create any special problems for the existing commercial tenants at the shopping center. There have been no zoning violations associated with previous fairs operated by the Applicant. -2- /'N n The fairs will consist of 20 to 25 booths with the individual artists or craft persons exhibiting their wares. The proposed hours of operation for the fair are between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Previously, the City's Chief of Police has recommended that the exhibit hours for the December fair conclude at 4:00 p.m., in order to discourage any incidents of "strong arm" robbery. However, last year the Commission approved the 6:00 p.m. time and no problems resulted. Given this, Staff is supportive of the Applicant's 6:00 p.m. ending. Additionally, during last year's hearing the Applicant requested the Commission to allow exhibitors to sleep over in their Recreational Vehicles. The Commission permitted overnight use of the RV's subject to approval by the Planning Director. No problems were known to have occurred from the sleep overs; therefore, Staff has included this same provision in the Resolution of approval. The Applicant's proposal has been reviewed by the applicable public agencies and conditions of approval have been included in the Resolution of approval. RECOMMENDATION FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take Testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit. ACTION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit Application PA 88-044. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A - Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit PA 88-044 Background Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Written Statements and Site Plan 3. Dublin Plaza Shopping Center - Merchants Association, Letter and Agreement dated March 8, 1988. -3- RESOLUTION NO. 88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 88-044 MARG-ETT ART AND CRAFT FAIRS - MARIETTA LEWIS (APPLICANT) DUBLIN PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION (SPONSOR) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW TWO ART AND CRAFT FAIRS AT THE DUBLIN PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER WHEREAS, Marietta Lewis/Dublin Plaza Shopping Center Merchants Association request approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow two Art and Craft Fairs at the Dublin Plaza Shopping Center (July 21-24, 1988, and December 1-4, 1988); and WHEREAS, the adopted City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance, as amended, provides for the operation of arts and crafts fairs for up to two seperate events of a maximum of four days each, per twelve month period, through the Conditional Use Permit process; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on June 6, 1988; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and has been found to be categorically exempt; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Conditional Use Permit will not have a significant environmental impact; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Conditional Use Permit application be approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony herein above setforth; and WHEREAS, the proposed land use, if conditionally approved, is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area and will not overburden public services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission finds: a) Use of the pedistrian store front areas of this portion of the Dublin Plaza Shopping Center for two short-term arts and crafts fairs serves the public need. b) The use, as conditioned by this Resolution, will be properly related to other land uses, and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity, and will not be in conflict with existing commercial uses in the Dublin Plaza Shopping Center; c) The use will not materially adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detri- mental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, as all applicable regulations will be met; d) The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the District in which it is to be located, as the proposed use will be compatible with adjoining retail uses and will serve to promote additional vehicular and pedestrian traffic through the Dublin Plaza Shopping Center; e) The approval of the Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the Dublin General Plan; PA Z2-O( mR'. its 4 Cra ShauZ — Cu.P f) The proposed dates for the Art and Craft Fairs are consistent with the City Ordinance No. 18-84 in that the proposal will not exceed two four day fairs within a 12-month period. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve said application as shown by materials labeled Exhibit B and stamped approved on file with the Dublin Planning Department, subject to the following conditions: 1. Layout and operation of the two arts and crafts fairs shall be as generally depicted on the partial center site plan submitted with the application and as described by the applicant's written statement (Attachment 2). 2. The Arts and Crafts fairs shall be held on July 21-24, 1988, and December 1-4, 1988, between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. 3. The items sold at the show shall be restricted to handmade or handcrafted items by the original artist. The density of the display setups shall be graphically portrayed on an exhibit prepared by the applicant and submitted for review and approval by the Dublin Planning Department and the D.S.R.S.D. Fire Department. Displays shall be set up in such a manner that pedestrian traffic is not shifted into the adjoining driveway/fire-lane aisle. 4. The display areas shall not obstruct pedestrian movement on the side- walk, block fire protection appliances or fire lanes and shall be kept clear of all store entrances. 5. Signage shall be restricted to a maximium of two 24 square feet signs; all said signs, including A-frame signs, shall not be located offsite or within the public right-of-way. Temporary no-parking/no-stopping signs shall be posted along the curb line. 6. Any trash or litter resulting from the event shall be removed immediately after the show. 7. No arts or crafts shall be left on the premises overnight. 8. A certificate of insurance naming the City of Dublin as additional insured in the amount of one million dollars shall be posted with the City prior to conducting the shows. 9. Assigned recreational vehicle parking for the Art & Craft Show exhibitors shall be provided on the premises with the number and location subject to review and comment by the Dublin Plaza Shopping Center Merchants Association and subject to review and approval by the Dublin Planing Department. Said review shall occur a mininum of two weeks prior to the Art & Craft Fair. 10. All activities shall be controlled so as not to create a nuisance to the existing retail businesses within the Dublin Plaza Shopping Center. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -2- C-1 c, 4 �1....°°.PD ' P,.. . . [�( hi 5 .°j�i.S 11 1 .F C.tFlOrd.Nu 1�1_ fis�'rr D-20 C- 1,SU 4 AIISSA iy C.C.Ord.No. ' [ . °le, M `•11♦ r i� Pnl�% 1; rr. -°_w y 4 = C ca 21.85 . i , X 5°SI II* n 145-DIA C-2 f- i 1 Pn85-035 �.. 'S w d�:1: ' \\ 2,1 r, [4 C-O a✓'',a O ` 0 • ;% 1 < ; f .... f,: ?/1� ,IA�!1a 7,M l� 7511 ' ..a,♦ • .� i Y•\ Q Q __ r i;� �"x iiiir `31 '�•a NCIXN SC11001 r. # g I+_IIII L . 11111 '— ���,�• R-1-84 • 1.1 ,�,'1� •°'''' 4‘.. 1, 1 Mpg i c-i \ 4.6 �I 11111�- �1'i11 *9irk. 7,0000hwsn $,R.R,S.' 0.C) „_•. • 0 PD wri ��� / ',2es v° �t' PA84-08 pp IF'S 0 \ C.C.Ord.No.4•85 �-� . ~'^° ,' `• S.R.R.S.P. C.C.Ctrd.No.14•14 . PABa•076 r /,'... • PA83•42 • P 8 N� ' ''` o •����� ��``+ SCRIR.S.",0 011Ip i C-2 i 10 N: PD '0:...,,ii,ii1l1-'i,1 N11Ml1s1i 13oluSsl.e 00 do s•'wA**.,i,,.i.k.0O,A.0SW, „.AlIaI*cA 0o0%E A E li;t, ., 1 ew li \ trZet:,..2 'd 1- 137 MO VA.*: ''..01.,1% tv%C-0 10,P 0 S i erc* ' • SW i illiV # #Z110. # ...'. Ai . tc.:4,„, ; r...... • / oix v 0 4.1.- s• w ° A.20rd.78•ua i ,-... ),r, .„„„lik- _' ,'1- �rPD 40 1rrrl is .. � i CITY OF DUBIW _ (f )1 \ '`�!. ', Tit 1a • RfbiRdort VA11E S3Lvd. ,'. 1377 d -°� Ac 66Rsl•N "Cs. �,Kr. cc- �a �f T L I 1 ,rifi, RE ii• 3 n a I Z r,) L S,>cc ER 1444/,•17 tr- N 7 �/ - \ LRu .Sy /T A T. t, .' 4. yi3i/IiCIK7/` ac.. Is.Z E /4.7;tfrAphy y -P; 1 N N. a PiiisS14.,Zi IS 111 t1 a piRdP0A,T. en se o a FEr+;Ly fi7,v0ss 4< u � x / r. 77S a /"1 Fiv kk-A, 7EpT e c. ',INPAMKl'4/c A EE A pKbL,N bLVd. PA 88-Oyq Zwesi_e�t}S Npa4s/exo`-Fis MARL —ETT S ART ANO CRAFT SHOWS 1377 WYLIE WAY SAN JOSE, CA. 95130 -474-7 761'" </.61--d z1-44 .Z / • J./ sdiz i G U -y,- C�it.t ;s Li:tL ' �St-s, 1-yr�L C�1. -t_y LrfcCi.�. Gam': Lc.+�i, J G �i LI' • . -"Cl-4-7749> `(--/��-�` ' Ott= e , ,Z,fr7, 9.• gn. ..4 4,p/sT , )i L�L jam{- �.L. 1-G •c--'{-' r1Q •rtS tL t9 z. of A4 MARL-ETT • ART AND CRAFT SHOWS • 1377 WYLIE WAY • SAN JOSE.. CA. 6.5I3O yot-e7,te 07Z0 S if .2 /fd( • L• ,-- j ) I )6d4 , 0,71 ...1-0-0-e ,-.11-•- --/- 1-. .-- 7M ial- . ht-,-/- 6.- 9/.r4 t ,.,-A6L:ce_-4.z -...----)-,--- -7,-., -./-101 ,i .,--.•-e---,. ..,,L,44L 24:222 ty._ EJ. .7i-a .4,_,,./L..7.1404.,,) ..,t _,,i,...../..h. 4. ---- , .,../Z. r)e-e..,, //„.„...:z1- 4 .-e.ez A. ,z_ L- ' C..= ... . j ai (__ _,__: /, - i,2 �'/Th'i' s-,.,Z-., /- _ /fit •,,i i j 4_,,-e:/./_ i-e--,-•1-4-4.-i-A-e-Z z--;-7 --Z 7,.._ _z_,..tze__„.....,:,. i-k- �271 7 ,< -ZL77'-e— e- 7/71--2i4,Z .1—, Lv--4. Let-s--#2,,L -7 ,e.;____e: /, J;) e/_a..,;.._,iZzz__ Z...-c-:,-z-Z> .,._2,,L-- _,.."--ez--,...-2.,_,47, a-77i--1.---,,-z-d...<1-t:o-,- c&1,..- ---/-c__. cfr-/,.. ,4-4-c-/-4_.), __,_..-:.,_„ ‘,---._..---2.4.,,e,_..-rc, 0 - 1" `-2``Yl �.. - - ley/ 77i <LZC l• L_ t Al.g-0LIL A ,,, :r 7 tt t‘ et n-.-!%- n"or-1N 7 v_et.i..e.,r_s : A a C 9 Mang-Ett • • f t s • � o _ . RULES FOR ARTISTS WHO PARTICIPATE IN 7HE Y..RG-ETT ART SHOWS 1. All exhibitors are requested to be at the show center at 8:00 A.M. on the first day of the show for set up and thereafter to be set up before stores Dpen. 2. Exhibitors are not allowed to bring small children or pets while displaying their art. 3. Autos of exhibitors are to be parked in areas as may be provided by the shopping center as soon as you are unloaded. 4. Once the show has ended, no one is to return to the center to disolav 1 their art. . 5. Any art object which is deemed repugnant or offensive by the merchants is not acceptable and must be removed upon request. b. Entry fee, as specified, must be paid before show time and 10% commission paid at the end of the show. 7. Avoid arguments with shopping center merchants. Should a problem arise, contact the show chairperson., 8. Your display must be as neat as possible. 9. Your dress attire must be clean and neat. 10. Keep your area clean at all times. I agree not to hold the M;RG-ETT ART AND CRAFT SHOW, merchants or the shopping center responsible for any theft or damage to the art displayed. SIGNED TELEPHONE NO, DATE 1PA t8-otitt • e'ttss ea 4 o A% tJ�� • • DUBLIN PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER Merchants r3 Association P. 0. B 0 X 2 6 6 1 '/(° D U B L I N , C A L I F O R N I A 9 4 5 6 8 March 8, 1988 Marg-ett Art and Crafts 1377 Wylie Way San Jose, .CA 95130 Approval is hereby given by the Dublin Plaza Merchants Association to Marg-ett Art and Craft Shows for two shows to be held in our shopping center, Dublin Plaza , for the following dates; July 21-24 and December 1-4 1988 . We are looking foward to having you back acain this year. Sincerly, teve Heath Dublin Plaza Merchants Assoc. Prci gg-oily 3 ti eti s • 0 _ AGREEMENT • The parties to this Agreement are JQ j)&,__,//id, /f _,421-andMarg-ettShows. Center is the owner or lessor of the premises known as Ad (- ,..; (L., , (hereinafter referred to as the "Center"). Marg-ett Shows desires to use a portion'of the premises for certain periods of time, for the purposes hereafter specified. The parties agree as follows: 1. The type of activity is as follows: �-� 4 �/ • 2. The date of the activity is pi, -2/- .2f4 / ff ,a-z.•L £-_ /- j/9�T 3. The Center agrees that Marg-ett Shows may use and occupy that portion of _ the premises which is designated on Exhibit A for the purpose of selling arts and crafts on the dates above specified during the hours of 9;•eogrto G:eoPM on said dates. This location shall not be changed without the prior consent of Marg-ett Shows. 4. Marg-ett Shows will maintain location in a clean condition. S. Marg-ett Shows shall obtain any and all permits that may be lawfully required by the appropriate governmental authorities with respect to the activities. 6. Marg-ett Shows shall obtain, or has obtained, the following insurance in connection with the activity: Ojo/co coo J. :„.1,-/r, . / 7. Any party to this agreement may cancel or terminate this agreement by giving notice thereof to the remaining parties so long as said notice is given at least }L (3 J) days prior to the first day the activity is set to take place. / 8. Mcrg-ett Shows shall pay the Center a lump sum in consideration of this agreement, in the amount of , receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement, this , --Iari/ day of /t1 - , 19 •P-3-' enter" �, =�.z.. / Z. \--21?2')Z /[ (_• Al,-,<.,- '- Marietta Lewi� • -1 7 pll L.- 0,,:j. ,.,, , „ it,. , 1400._ettm5 co.s, , yq R � ' YY 5zo-Fz, c;uP CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 6, 1988 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff tr- SUBJECT: PA 88-050 Love And Care Daycare Conditional Use Permit GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: A Conditional Use Permit to allow the continued operation of a day-care center for a maximum of 20 children at 7624 Hillrose Road APPLICANT: LaVelda Singleton Love And Care Daycare 1379 Saybrook Road Livermore, CA 94550 Carlene King 936 Lamboren Avenue Livermore, CA 94550 PROPERTY OWNER: Gleera Brewer 173 El Caminito Livermore, CA 94550 PROPERTY LOCATION: 7624 Hillrose Road Dublin, CA 94568 ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-172-88 PARCEL SIZE: 6,500 square feet GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential (.9 - 6.0 units/acre) EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: R-1-B-E (Single Family Combining District) SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: R-1-B-E South: R-1-B-E East: R-1-B-E West: R-1-B-E ZONING HISTORY: July 1982 - Alameda County approved a Conditional Use Permit to operate a day-care center for a maximum of 20 children at 7624 Hillrose Drive COPIES TO: Applicant (2) 8.5 -1- Owner ITEM NO. File PA 88-050 Building Fire Police n August 1985 - Conditional Use Permit approved by the City of Dublin Planning Commission to continue existing operation of day-care for up to 20 children at 7624 Hillrose Drive. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-26.3 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained from the Planning Commission for the establishment of a Community Facility, which includes day-care centers, when proposed within a single family zone. Section 8-63.0, 8-63.4, 8-63.17 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that a single family home have two parking spaces; that spaces cannot occupy a front yard; and that the required parking shall be provided and maintained when a use is established and/or a building is structurally altered. Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or peformance standards established for the district in which it is located. Section 8-94.4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be valid only for a specified term, and may be made contingent upon the acceptance and observance of specified conditions, including but not limited to the following matters: a) substantial conformity to approved plans and drawings; b) limitations on time of day for the conduct of specified activities; c) time period within which the approval shall be exercised and the proposed use brought into existence, failing which, the approval shall lapse and be void; d) guarantees as to compliance with the terms of the approval, including the posting of bond; e) compliance with requirements of other departments of the City/County Government. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Categorically exempt, Class 1, Section 15101 - Minor alteration of an existing private structure involving a negligence expansion of use beyond that previously existing (single family residence used as a day-care facility). NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the June 6, 1988, hearing was published in The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. ANALYSIS: Love and Care Daycare is applying for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the continued operation of a day-care center for a maximum of 20 children at 7624 Hillrose Road. The Applicant's use involves care of 2 to 6 1/2 year olds during weekdays from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Alameda County originally approved this day-care center in July 1982. The City approved the use permit in 1985 with a three-year time limit. The current approval expires August 15, 1988 and no changes in the operation are proposed with the new requested use permit. -2- n n Staff has supported previous Conditional Use Permit applications for day-care centers provided potential problems (noise and traffic) were minimized or eliminated altogether. In this case, the City has not received any complaints regarding the operation of the day-care center. Given this Staff is recommending that the use permit be approved with a three-year time limit and up to a two-year extension by the Planning Director if the appropriate findings can be made. As the Planning Commission is aware from previous applications, there appears to be a tremendous need for day-care facilities in this area. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the application on the basis of the need and the absence of any apparent problems. RECOMMENDATION: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Resolution regarding the Conditional Use Permit. ACTION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution (Exhibit "A") approving Conditional Use Permit Application PA 88-050. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit PA 88-050 Background Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan and Floor Plan 3. Applicant's Statement -3- RESOLUTION NO. 88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 88-050 LOVE AND CARE DAYCARE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION TO ALLOW THE CONTINUED OPERATION OF A DAYCARE CENTER AT 7624 HILLROSE ROAD WHEREAS, LaVelda Singleton filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the continued operation of a day-care for a maximum of 20 children at 7624 Hillrose Road; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance provides for the operation of day-care uses in residential areas through the Conditional Use Permit process. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said application on June 6, 1988; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and has been found to be categorically exempt; and WHEREAS, a Staff Analysis was submitted recommending the application be conditionally approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony and hereinabove set forth; WHEREAS, the proposed land use is conditionally approved, is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area and will not overburden public facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that: a) The use is required by the public need because both single and married parents who work need day-care facilities; b) The use will be properly related to other land uses and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity as daytime activities will be commensurate with present use of properties in the neighborhood; c) The use, if permitted, under all the circumstances and conditions of this particular case, will not materially adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood as all applicable regulations will be met; d) The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the District in which it is to be located, as a day-care is consistent with the character of the residential district; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve said application as shown by materials labeled Exhibit "B", on file with the Dublin Planning Department, subject to the following conditions: -1- t?AB$-050 I. vt.RntCARE t'�ESCNae� Cute n 1) The day-care shall be limited to a maximum of 20 children. 2) The Applicant shall meet all requirements of the Building Inspection Department and the Dublin/San Ramon Services District. 3) No modifications to the site or exterior portion of the structure shall be done prior to the review and approval by Staff. 4) The day-care operator shall on an annual basis, at a minimum, make the necessary arrangements to have thje Dublin Police Services Child Abuse Program, or an equivalent program, presented to the children involved with this day-care and the day-care staff. 5) The permit shall be valid for a period of three (3) years expiring on June 17, 1991). The approval period for the Conditional Use Permit may be extended up to two additional years (Applicant must submit a written request for the extension prior to the expiration date of the Conditional Use Permit) by the Planning Director upon the Director's determination that the Conditions of Approval remain adequate to assure that the stated findings will continue to be met. 6) This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. 7) The existing driveway shall be kept clear to accommodate vehicles dropping off and picking up children attending the facility. 8) School noise shall be controlled so as not to create a nuisance to the adjoining residential neighborhood. 9) Existing non-conforming sign advertising the day care shall be removed. 10) The Applicant shall submit to the Planning Director copies of applicable state licenses and permits and any renewal or extensions of such documents to operate (or continue to operate) a daycare/preschool. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -2- SEE SHEET 2A . -n t#Itpl, 7 '7. 2n f WAS a. . t;,... ' r-1 •••.... a 1:1* ilir 8 74 TO -- ) cn C I I F I I �3 4 �. � ^\'oQ iffr p > ,- . , ...,,.. I � mi... .. w. „. , /-\\ ys. . . . Pr* • �'. / 0 ,... ft %I b , it* g- 1. • /4 i 441,411t# Viiiiiii lilt 41%6 ft 'W‘ 4 isfAtiit4 ' . . New. - li----., • iiv- i*,4.-,,%., , .....,, _ 1 'On 10‘ 04filil ':\ • IIIIIL 4t°%111111 \ 4-12 �' ° 4� tip. I- \ ; •. `• %Al • 17------7-Z-T . .- :---- ' •I'l "Qw.." 1 I '4...0'- .111 1011,4 I V T _!:& 1, .� �A ••• <*T CO 1 n_i__ __:,:.,„v,. ..:::" ' . '�j Y pOwllr \ I' .4 ______,---„„,-;0041,al : ‘. .--. , :u.uurm ■III f I • 1 o\ 1 i /, i .0aM rr 1,C1Rr,� '■ MO callallillow ON . ,• ______. :-"-) 110V11.....a i a 011111%6 TO ii1111_ 1;$ %7'''4111"-",IP -'--' :: • c-l'' 'r..-C'7Z'• w4 ,'.2'.. I" s(.:. N. -- sr.._.) --------1 , ' -,66 . ''''''... \ '.i.g.C: 01 --',-;-.,-' $11141.-- „ dr ; ,"c\-29 1-7` . • $ g 'Zt4.1 ‘, ,--,7-'7---- - ,,,..r>. 7:2:4, -, i„ ° o d - r .$ .. ' Id's: ' 0 4_ ,.... . ,.,..-- ,,, , . -; , , \ ...,,,,, 4,,,,,, • ....._ ..s. \_____ . --;x, _ ,* /. . . • aa ...11,m � Cn �` ,an 1 . r o - - �* ii �-7.•_ � .,off/�� ■ - 'jW �sj : 1 i 1 ��-:' 'I '' ' ,M• L -- -/ \ v- • .-i' r r 1 [..o err -1l sop Z'rill I. Z>:'''''' OM 1.: 0 M[MII[D S1 • _ ,, .�.o.. THE PART OF THE R1 in m ° 't= E _ CITY OF al SANTINA a ZONING MAP DUBLIN I THOMPSON Inc. N .g . c PRINTED THE CITY O" Ne p. OCT 2 1986 CALIFORNIA C.....�C.w.......". DUB L I N -- DIIRLIN PAC -060 l aTtoi l KA-4P 14,24 •tu.l2osE Li (Me--- 4 CA4.t, Q K Sr—hop l Attachmeotj '4° ° r• r. N 4 "' . _ �'3b �� 7< -RR 60 00 ELji r /E A/o r at1 �3y ) 4 �;;t� RECEIVED k 00+ - '� M!-kY 1 u 1S83 PIPE X 1 TuuNEL DUBLIN PLANNING (q Da \ .4',1.5s �x ` CiRl!✓EL; vl 1 , Ad7t o K N •.. o. • . c id r J opaA, —,y p PAT'. -7 WI 4 .V r.a SCF/OcL N X. 1 I z5 ,d 4 . -, ^ L.,HCEL Cf(idg 6# il-d DC; 1. . N - / 1 I I I a aa j 'I el, ARta = sS6gQ' 5rr PLAN 7E25' H///ro,sp i, s a/e /"=ZO' Loy E fl C,9RE Dale`"le 7w93'6 Dn.) GK P$CES c 6,00t_ 45s 04• 96L/-/7Z-88 iec,-a AArliersa•, Ph J,/c 443 0 L.wc.'.+,ar,4.0v--ic,•) P4 Is•osO UWE r Cast •' SChmI .2 eclo — —r.T e • 1� 4 XS 3-w�, �-yfl I • • A 0 0 K/T qpy� Jj A D's x ro i': is'o01 4PEA ,o'x .,•e•• L.11111 L. r. ;-�• I< 'a I obi I ,.. ~ _ _�, - ZI`^ I I 'J 6' SCHOo4 p,PFy :, • +. crag 4 ' ` G`�gAGE�r STORAGE ' �6 3'z''�'� �71 • rak , "c• p;• 3fo.�,` �' CHgC bRE �' s k •'� � • : ,; 7' x Z L' •• BATH p i • ;O 4—',.Ti- 1 . . , . .. .„ .. .. .„ F �, y 1 , �� ` , t{.•x B a"_"' OF /c e- L. . e t g k4 n L:1:3 Z• jTFdj •.. yi th E8.9 YE (� 4 4 n I 1 4 j " m :' s .✓s :.F:F1r t ,,`M+Y ✓"..f ;;s;,,.s t 1 • eyc ' V ''ta , 'dy�.•{a , ;;, - qt s tx ,. r . la l.A.gh 1-�' 4 yf. br ! :'r'. y 4r i /F tR f 11 4 qr :` St a r ,' ; L` s '' 7sr'°8'" a ,s i`i Y , y f,r 'a � y"" "s` ' J '* r k� a y `'f- xX 0 n k4 $ 'a fa/ t14� t 4 Hfi, i . Yj ' � yes %Y yt i k9�. q < f. .ti 4 .'.e >:11' f+X'e� t• � x .�� s� J:y:,• x4sk..F4f4,4 tv„fL-K+r rJ,.•C rn �& S � S ,3�r. r.. . ; '' r ;'„:::a ,x ' z.e:dfLtAj„ �,t tTl' Y {h ✓ y '" a 4;' t:� ' 7 ;.r .x ` � i . •�•s.y Fs xwi-',., r'l r .i: .. 4,,,,.`,...4,- a .."4-4' •r ,x'4`4�an£ 4_ A o ff /o r.. 4 *Y-` ,sA.r ti6n a -:Ac$T . ' . Ywlitir k t . � t „ x. { .,r �c� �� y ',• +' "t;� • 61 ,11'9 giw• ,r i . �^` i �yi ^¢ s a � y: ,,v� �i :,G$A s , x, t t F X'J �` t c , . - f:tis �T+i� t ,4.y0'{ 4 . T qgk c.4-. ., . . ;.:2,' t '", ', ;^.. f ° � � w y `.7. _ S ^" f''Aj. 't4 ' • .-' :i t'�ti ,c" ":w - Yr ,.,„,,a ^. ~;', .IS i e f, i , : : t F ' `Ag 5. ' F �} "rr r ",r; + . S .,,, 0 , ` ..., 7q`.,., ` . 4- ;_ ;i[ i v ' 7 s,y a 4, } ...,7,, g "`4.; " ,A,z�'X i . arY✓>4 ,Tr , A fi �W •, � 1:4� F.< t- aaJ0' .1r " -r " C ,,4, . .4,f � o f1-7.--1 'a' .- *-4, � ai4q � a - - ,wu 4 " •s/ tcit�3 - lrf + .+r:L; ,.- -q, i, M� f •T.," Af'y,!i fkt ;,f C : t1.: ,. *,x ' y �c < ,,�u ,,..,t;( y V , " « gvi r < " ^�:."� � e C ii .4". z'h �c - , 4`. ; 4 t, : i "' 7 .4r` ia ^�' . % �. 1 ' s' ., _ ' �- i.-4j f $70e r hi '' ` A :--gs �s T-� '1QPka .,,nt, Lx." s + {4 ' r ''i 4«i�� 3 `e t' ` s v � l s a • s >`.' :i r; �` � ✓ a ' r ti ` -b , • . a4k tit`„4 �Y ., «.��� `+,,,•t -: :fz !- ,,o aw a• s s s`'f'hs '-' Y tt s� ',., +.t � Pt.tn'a +L T_ wsi�r Ao-$ w r x�Y.� w,Adka3 ic. rih- s,.; ; x Er . / lir� ` :aza-Z5 :i.t" �+ ....,<hb K reu..r r:r.." • '' �, frGt•wr{t .SY ;41,1 RE :CI 1YED Written Statement MAY 12 ics,? DUBLIN PLANNING Love and Care Preschool has already been developed and operating since July 1982 , when Alameda County plans were submitted and school was approved. The school has a home-like atmosphere emphasizing the development of positive self image, basic academic and motor skills and creative enrichment. The program provides the child with a balance of structured and open-ended learning experiences to de- velop cognitive; motor , and effective skills . Skills are presented at a rate..:;' which is developmentally appropriate. The school! s curriculm ' prepares a child for kindergarten. Parents participation is encouraged. We work with parents as guidance is needed in the frustrations of childTrearing. Visitors from the community are_.invited into class room for special programs . Field trips are offered for older children. Our children were in a fire prevention film put together by Dublin fire Dept . during month of Dec . All children have the same basic needs; love , guidance , acceptance , control, -security, dependence and independence, and a sense of trust and of self-respect . The attitudes and relation- ships of parents and teachers , along with the environment, contribute much to achild!'a> learning. We at Love and Care feel this is provided and would like to continue serving the Dublin community. VA s -oso later 4 Ca.K.,p,t,1e.604 Attachment . ..... . Abc(e a ' ^ /*N CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 6, 1988 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff t40V' SUBJECT: PA 88-042 Avcar Rental/Howard Johnson Hotel, Conditional Use Permit, 6680 Regional Street GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: A Conditional Use Permit request to expand the existing hotel use to allow a vehicle rental lot and office at the Howard Johnson Hotel at 6680 Regional Street APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Daniel E. Mara Avcar Rental 440 O'Farrell Street San Francisco, CA 94101 PROPERTY OWNER: Motor Lodge Associates 6680 Regional Street Dublin, CA 94568 Attn: Johnson Clark LOCATION: 6680 Regional Street ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-1500-47-3 PARCEL SIZE: 5.61 acres GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Office/Retail EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: C-1 Retail Business District Hotel/Restaurant/Parking DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: Zone 2: General Commercial The Downtown Specific Plan encourages mix use development of retail, hotel and commercial recreation uses within Zone 2. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: C-1 - Bowling Alley South: Flood Control & Highway I-580 East: C-1 - Restaurant - and M-1 West: Flood Control & Highway I-580 ZONING HISTORY: 1 S-421 and C-2418 - The Alameda County Planning Director approved a Site Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a 93-unit motel and restaurant (Howard Johnson Motor Lodge) and five signs - March 15, 1972. F S-595X and C-3206 - In April, 1977, approval was granted to add 48 units to the Motor Lodge. S-777X and C-3787 - In May, 1980, an additional 22 units were approved for the Motor Lodge. COPIES TO: Applicant g•/ Owner ITEM NO. 1Q File PA 88-042 /'1 S-600 - A Site Development Plan for the Willow Tree Restaurant was approved by the Alameda County Planning Director on June 23, 1977. PA 83-002 - On March 28, 1983, the Dublin City Council approved a request to rezone the subject property from Light Industrial (M-1) and Highway Frontage (H-1) to Retail Business (C-1). PA 83-011 - A Site Development Review approval was granted on May 16, 1983, to allow a 550 square foot addition and remodeling to take place at the main lobby area of the motel. PA 84-026 - On June 18, 1984, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit and Site Development Review for a 77-unit addition to the existing motel. PA 86-081 - On September 15, 1986, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for a 28-foot tall Freestanding Sign on the rear portion of the site. On October 14, 1986, the Zoning Administrator denied without prejudice a Variance request to consider the existing Freestanding Sign as a Directional Sign. On November 3, 1986, the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Administrator's decision denying the Variance request. On November 24, 1986, the City Council continued the Applicant's appeal. On January 22, 1987, the Applicant withdrew the appeal. PA 87-014 - On March 2, 1987, the Planning Commission approved a Variance request (1) to allow a Freestanding Sign which is not located within the middle one-third of the lot, (2) to allow the sign to exceed the maximum permitted sign area based on setback, and (3) to allow the sign to exceed maximum permitted height based upon setback and a Conditional Use Permit for a second Freestanding Sign located at the entrance of the Howard Johnson Hotel site. PA 87-093 - On July 6, 1987 and July 20, 1987, the Planning Commission considered a Conditional Use Permit application to construct a 26-foot-tall Freestanding Sign setback 20 feet from the rear property line (instead of constructing the sign approved under PA 86-081). On July 10, 1987, the Applicant withdrew the application. PA 88-017 - On March 21, 1988, the Planning Commission denied a Conditional Use Permit and Variance request to construct a 26 foot tall freestanding sign which would exceed the height, sign area and setback restrictions. On March 24, 1988, Applicant appealed the Planning Commission's action. On April 11, 1988, the City Council took no action on the appeal thereby upholding the Planning Commission's action denying the Conditional Use Permit and Variance request. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-48.2(j) requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit to operate a hotel in the C-1 District. Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or peformance standards established for the district in which it is located. Section 8-94.4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be valid only for a specified term, and may be made contingent upon the acceptance and observance of specified conditions, including but not limited to the following matters: a) substantial conformity to approved plans and drawings; b) limitations on time of day for the conduct of specified activities; c) time period within which the approval shall be exercised and the proposed use brought into existence, failing which, the approval shall lapse and be void; -2- A d) guarantees as to compliance with the terms of the approval, including the posting of bond; e) compliance with requirements of other departments of the City/County Government. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The City proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance which finds that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the June 6, 1988, hearing was published in The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. ANALYSIS: The Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to operate a vehicle rental facility within the existing Howard Johnson Hotel lobby and parking lot. The proposed vehicle rental facility is considered an ancillary use to the primary use, Howard Johnson Hotel. The City Zoning Ordinance requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit for hotel uses in the C-1 District. The Howard Johnson Hotel received approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the hotel use on March 15, 1972 and subsequently in 1977, 1980 and 1984 for various expansions to the hotel. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit is required to operate the vehicle rental facility, as the proposed ancillary use constitutes an expansion of the existing hotel use. Staff notes that although the Applicant indicates Budget Rental Car had operated a car rental facility at the Howard Johnson Hotel for the past 12 years, a Conditional Use Permit was never granted for the use. The Applicant proposes to occupy approximately 56 square feet of floor area within the existing hotel lobby and 20 parking spaces within the hotel's southeast parking lot. Parking is the primary issue related to the Applicant's proposal to expand the hotel use to allow the rental facility. Required parking for the Howard Johnson Hotel is based upon the number of hotel rooms, square footage or occupancy load (whichever is greater) of the restaurant and bar facilities and the square footage of the banquet facilities. The following represents current parking requirements for the hotel facility: Howard Johnson Hotel Facility Parking Capacity/ Parking Required Use Square Footage Ratio Parking Spaces Hotel Rooms 239* 1 space/room + 2 spaces 241 Restaurant/Bar Facilities 245** 1 space/4 occupants 61 Banquet Facilities 2750 sq.ft. 1 space/100 square feet 28 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 330 *Number of Rooms **Occupancy Capacity Based upon information (square footage and occupancy capacity) obtained from Building Department records 330 parking spaces are required for the Howard Johnson Hotel and facilities. The plans submitted by the Applicant indicate in the "Summary" a total of 372 on-site parking spaces. However, Staff's review of the plans notes that 354 parking spaces were counted. Based upon Staff's count the site contains 24 parking spaces in excess of those required by the Zoning Ordinance. -3- The Applicant's request to utilize 20 parking spaces will not compromise the required parking for the site and is compatible with the existing use of parking on the site. Any future expansion of the hotel or ancillary uses on site will necessitate the Applicant's verification of the number of on-site parking spaces. The Applicant's request has been reviewed by the Planning, Building, Engineering, Police and Fire Departments. Applicable conditions of approval are included in the Draft Resolution. The Applicant indicates the hours of operation for the vehicle rental business will be from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8 a.m. to 12 midnight, Saturday and Sunday. Restrictions on the hours of operation are not included in the Draft Resolution. The proposed use is an appropriate ancillary use for the hotel facility and can be expected to maintain business hours compatible with the hotel's hours of operation. Hours of operation for the hotel facility has not been a problem as the facility is located within the C-1 Retail Business District, surrounded by commercial and light industrial uses. The Applicant's proposal is consistent with the C-1 Retail Business District (as an ancillary use to the existing hotel), the General Plan and the Downtown Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Resolutions relating to PA 88-042, or give Staff and Applicant direction and continue the matter. ACTION: Adopt Resolution adopting Negative Declaration (Exhibit C) and adopt Resolution approving PA 88-042 Avcar Rental/Howard Johnson Hotel Conditional Use Permit (Exhibit B) ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Site Plan dated received April 28, 1988 Exhibit B: Resolution of Approval Conditional Use Permit Exhibit C: Resolution adopting Negative Declaration Background Attachments 1. Applicant's Submittal, Application and Written Statement 2. Location Map -4- .�„.- --• -- . . - . � � • . • •• + ). »;t •.......7»`.,�''"' ,: !., •,. eura+a i..Id tA., • I,..t - _::'T+W; ,- .1` f. -• - -i • 1:i _ __.. . . v n,.wn+rew. r.L • W++.ae.aoaL - - .I.... a...... •.• • • \•••I .�:%ri,.w, m.....T ...1 ( Y•_r-s, �/INDEX 7O DRAWINGS Z"= 1;. • • • •-_-7-'_- A•• jiwe ...I : ..7, .-V ... _ ...' ... - - � •/ .Nr KA.Wu . nl llt••awr ww "�i c lM f� G O i I 'q a .. • t t"!".�..: �m.o. ; . •.,•a ` I A 1-A"--A I A A ,wa ( _•` -_� .y. i'1 �...•w...rw.. w.... ( . ~ ...•1 1 i A A A A A 1 A I _ w •• y,�i 'a5�.. :.. c\v-v,.1.. I �,1 f r-� , - , 1�1�1.�• ''•� .a/ . al W..w.,..,.•.wafts .•� w�..rw.r Mr RON WA '.. 1• F• I~ Q .:4 '..A,e.•.. °I.Ia• •...�•. A. _l . .• `f ' .� ...{a !µ►�I - R . 1 I • N A I. • E ..,. I' .-. wr.� • c� 46n°s n .,e.�,,,.- -G. ( 'a . til I r !41 i n. • j _1 y .,,,w.,t�I,.„t' .��. "l ../.'-A a1 L. ./, - . � I�,�• ' •.t•.r- m ,:. . -•,---•r'.,,-- 1. • `1 M Di - I I ' 1 In •'"".... ,.,.., ir..aa 11'1..•..r «.►we0i • `., �u ) KrY« � .•• ,...•e � •-r• a- -_Ai..a w�• ....r..n; I I '-( ' .ter/-i 1• d.. • (. I " .y, - 'M� / —• 415 n• •Aaal I \ r•�. f=;' ,-1 - T ' U H H A c Y f Ia..l afT•Yi •�f` • �I•..,C, �°.� A� • -7- T �i..f «--f .�._•- ^'�,• r . I A l ._ ( I -. +c • .71 t•.na.•a.a ..... I. ••a • -1 Q ,. I 1 -•i tQ e I I 1 1 I ri 9:, ® •,; ...D .. .. . • - • 1.:"..pRA.6. • •_ ' 1t F t --- - -- •Alar al.• u) • 1 �4 � .G wI ( 1 ( I I * `\ Mr. rr •RYA b. i - N ? II ` w©....s • _t \, r� _- • wawwr....ww nwne.v . .w+.m `[ ,y _ t. �vMt1 � tM 3) _ i rARwlra Fi e J O \� • • el'<Jkc_ - • ' CT w./w.r' t..rv.w.al ),�Ml.l.f•Afl.1. a -� a•a 11 (�� 11 •I/•: It l,n r.., -.ti , ..• •rr Its i{ 77J1 JI... ° 3 -, r ° ;t� o\.,.•r.want _:AvcM -•' __ _ 1 a• 'ly 4 i ._.L -!-• �. f .��.\ - .• lee ,a-r• 11, I 1 ..M�y'• e. e 1 —. • ••� 1 O.•..ATI. _ • e•a•I.•oral \\ , _ / / II.• , -- {._ , �.4 144t.► Intl ___. •a O. sn•e•. - •I .CC O. ` \ - • - - • - - �.•a ,IrKr— .▪• , -- r-••aw:w.• I..•,. 44•- i 1 In CC •. \ -- _ • � Lett �stt r�-. u O z a..,G 1 .. i ./ rues - ~ J .• 4 (/,�Y/ ( L,'+ l.L.wrr.ar A.Rr r•nr:aw.a R a Q _ _ Li- 1` .J V r.�. '.o rw.cY Rf/•1 .' W '� •r tx ` • r-. _ , f•e-'1.• = ' a! • r,w.r rR oa..us�•w.rr was a fw•w.. A. - -� Z -•f• o _ 1 ••v- : — ► _ • I - erwrwns !r%T.Imp ara.ma •n......St•u.w..+n°. .j dQ O �. T • i 'i 11O .. . ••- i_ I , '- jlf Z c e 1 i - _t• :- —� �M•.A'ya .•LTI •' : �; aq O .1, t 2 ..,_ iii awr .�1.r1». .. - — ' 4"`AVCAR 'PARKING- ... 1 P o • I. .11111 —� y : .1 a y • •...'ems• r l I .� /_�-_ I. ..�. ��. --'' i i h = !Ct q AID n -� •nn^ / ' ! i jI .1 t. I • •CO . .I• - - ' �_ • •- \I • \ \y. -- ,,. ..r ' IN I I'/.t1.`°R• t 14 ,� .J -I,..1-..t1 �` /•� • • 1 • I i(j \� I HL;.1 -._` •_ �_ 1 -+..�_ ,'�--�"�'.\x...•w... �r Mt_�. _�.'Y -_ S~ OCC:�� f- I - \ �,r- I —_. 1'. _yl.a'r.s i•�.w,�pm..ro••i G ..J! •' �coo==a7 tt II j 4' .� •Iv�v �����.��. PLANN IiO /T I /• t 1 - f' ( 1: : ..; :,-:--• , /�1r+•1 - sis - `,�.r✓/ ! / - •/,F.�/ _ y a°0cros;r+ • : ...1........+ w..a• • :C.1''L�S ;.)lFililSy, -• ,, r r-' ° .j..I (• '' +w T %/ /�� .�r./ /1.1/ / c:.i. • )-fin p - } y�, {I 1.421 ' •rrw... ... .. • .. - 1- _ -j• 1 - • —_`�� _._• �� 1 �a M ::, • • .. ' Ry l!,1 'I•'y� Z _ ! �a • -' u..'•. \{11 -1 ►M Y t .;7 -�-C�►5 — ^ • 1. S1� '� rlloa ratter �} .:.--- �is�isr.i ar.•K - ,.i'^'• s e i.\'\'\•\\\ i N -<: 1` • a -. Iwras,elurmr. • 1 • ' ' '_ ••\{ Mx �.:Tvs4•He. •.. _ rt•e 2 •ri •w .......•r.wrs , \ . N'1 re Ira' - - Ya _ • • • /-4.Ic.'9louc►4W.L.• a•rfir4 ! •. ` 1 ` 1- c =. .i .a. • 9:F' .. 1 # iv; :•-+ ` '," I ,.,k--. ,.4.. :r.._ .a., I, a _., ► . • . - ' • . , Af .' -\i« I .4- ' L`.' ' 6:•:'+• z� ► is1 _t. r•w, F r•:sl.11 t_ -i.k ee- ;, _ ri y,.• ,J RESOLUTION NO. 88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 88-042 AVCAR RENTAL/HOWARD JOHNSON HOTEL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION TO OPERATE A VEHICLE RENTAL LOT AND OFFICE AT 6680 REGIONAL STREET WHEREAS, Daniel E. Mara, representing Avcar Rental, filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit (PA 88-042) to allow the operation of a vehicle rental lot and office in the Howard Johnson Hotel lobby and parking lot at 6680 Regional Street; and WHEREAS, this application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Negative Declaration has been adopted (Planning Commission Resolution No. ) for this project as it will not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, notice of Public Hearing was published in The Herald, posted in public buildings, and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project in accordance with California State Law; and WHEREAS, a Staff Analysis was submitted recommending conditional approval of the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on June 6, 1988 to consider all reports, recommendations and testimony. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find that: a) The use is required to serve a public need in that the use provides a vehicle rental service available to the community and guests of the hotel. b) The use will be properly related to other land uses and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity in that daytime activities will be commensurate with present use of properties in the neighborhood, as the use will function as an ancillary use to the existing hotel use. c) The use, under all circumstances and conditions of this particular case, will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, in that all applicable regulations will be met. d) The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district in which it is to be located in that the vehicle rental business is ancillary to the existing hotel use which is consistent with the character of the commercial district. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve PA 88-042 as shown by materials labeled Exhibit A on file with the Dublin Planning Department and subject to the following conditions: 1. PA 88-042 Avcar Rental approval is for the rental of vehicles to include: a. automobiles (cars, station wagons, etc.); b. passenger and cargo vans; and c. pick-up trucks 2. The Avcar Rental office shall be restricted to the lobby or Administrative Office area of the existing Howard Johnson Hotel. -1- 88-o12 MCA R c Re.so 3. Storage and parking of Avcar Rental vehicles shall occupy a maximum of 20 parking spaces located within the southeast parking lot of the Howard Johnson Hotel in conformance with the Site Plan labeled Exhibit A. 4. The Applicant shall provide appropriate pavement marking designating the 20 parking spaces reserved for Avcar Rental vehicles. 5. The Applicant shall provide on-site directional signage within the hotel parking lot including directions to the rental office and rental vehicle parking area in compliance with Section 8-87.50 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 6. This permit shall expire June 17, 1990. The approval period may be extended one (1) additional year (the Applicant must submit a written request for the extension prior to the expiration date of the Conditional Use Permit) by the Planning Director upon the Director's determination that the Conditions of Approval remain adequate to assure that the stated findings will continue to be met. 7. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -2- RESOLUTION NO. 88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PA 88-042 AVCAR RENTAL/HOWARD JOHNSON HOTEL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION TO OPERATE A VEHICLE RENTAL LOT AND OFFICE AT 6680 REGIONAL STREET WHEREAS, Daniel E. Mara, representing Avcar Rental, filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a vehicle rental lot and office at the Howard Johnson Hotel at 6680 Regional Street; and WHEREAS, The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State guidelines and City environmental regulations, require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impact and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, an initial study was conducted finding that the project, as proposed, would not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this application; and WHEREAS, public notice of the Negative Declaration was given in all respects as required by State Law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did review and consider the Negative Declaration at a Public Hearing on June 6, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. That the project PA 88-042 Avcar Rental/Howard Johnson Hotel Conditional Use Permit will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared and processed in accordance with State and local environmental laws and guideline regulations. 3. That the Negative Declaration is complete and adequate. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission hereby adopts the Negative Declaration for PA 88-042 Avcar Rental/Howard Johnson Hotel Conditional Use Permit application. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director 'PA 8B-o42 AYCAK N n Reno. • /• • CITY OF DUBLIN . • I .O. Box 2340) P 4 642_ Dublin, CA 9456'4REt (4I5) 82`)-uhO( Planning Department (415) 829-4916 6500 Dublin Blvd. Suite D2, ^ "^'' Dublin CA 94568 APR :� � 1�=•' Eff.: 1/84 PLANNING APPLICATION FORM puauN ELANNI P Notes to Applicant: * Please discuss your proposal with Staff prior to completing the Planning Application • form. * All items related to your specific type of application must be completed. * Since this is a comprehensive application form, some of the items might not apply to your specific application. * Please print or type legibly. * Attach additional sheets if necessary. i. HORIZATION OF PROPERTY OWNER OW PROPERTY GWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full local capacity to, and hereby do,authorize the filing of this application. I understand . that conditions of approval are binding. I agree to be bound by these conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal period. Name: Johnson Clark Capacity: Property Owner Address: 6680 Regional St. Daytime Phone: (+15 ) 828-7750 Dubli C . 945 ( ) Signature: // 2 L� Date: 4-22-88 B. APPLICANT Op4ER THAN PROPERTY C N R: In signing this application, I, as aopli cant,. represent to have obtained authorization of the prose-tv owner to file this • application. I agree to be bound by conditions of a:preval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file this application and agreement to conditions cf approval, subject only to the right to Object at the hearings or during the appeal period. Name: Capacity: Address Daytime Phone: ( ) ( ) Signature: Date: 0AERTIFICATION I certify that I have the authorization of the property owner to file this application. I further certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Daniel E. Mara Capacity: General Manager Avcar Address: 440 O'Farrell St. Daytime Phone: (+15 ) 441-4779 q= Francisco Ca. 94102 ( 415) 459-2700 Signature: i • u, Date: 4-22-88 (OVER) • T. C- HMENT I f1I-88-o(Z AVC14-R A 1, o n z ,, ti ..i•`,,... . � ✓'..t . L rg♦! . # a?sso ._ M•-' ! ,r aF'yt"_` ♦t i•74rf 5 v afs ; i } a 4 y �4t �l4 .'._*. .S r f?< i•�yi1',y�y wq rf ;-� c { .fi x f r ; �.�" .� �f i- r c� "9 r";• Y - ^,3 i r +z r r., 'an:�.ryii.'R� i � ry '-,k Ffi�•� f � 'tit � et - . r r �f .✓ w, ..f c- N //r,' r. _^, .k �, �.t y - spys x `r F• s.. kr i . l srt` 9 /' 'eft, e."'' i fy i 1,. .a. kFY 4 i 5Y �.py},�'�.� X 3 I 1 !' f . :...__. III. GENERAL DATA REQUIRED 6:9Address or Location of Property: 6680 Regional St. , Dublin B. sessor Parcel Number(s) : 941=1 47-3 C. Site area: 5.6 acres D. Present Zoning: Commercial E. Existing Use of Property: Howard Johnson Hotel, Restaurant and former Budget Car Rental. F. Zoning and Existing Use Of Surrounding Property: Zone Existing Uses - North: C-1 : Bowling Alley - South: Flood Control : Highway I-580 - East: C-1 : Restaurant and M-1 - West: Flood Control : Highway 1-580 4111PDetailed Description of Proposed Use of Property: Vehicle rentals. We would be using approximately 56 sq. ft. (7'x 8' ) of space in Howard Johnson's lobby and 20 parking spaces outside. We would be replacing Budget Car Rental who served from this (Continue cn separate sheet if necessary) location for 12 years. Iv. TYPE OF APPLICATION Check type of planning permit(s) being requested: • ❑ Aclinistrative Conditional Use Permit 0 Rezoning ❑ Boundary Adjustment 0 Sign ] Conditional Use Permit 0 Site Devel F. ant Review ❑ General Plan Amenarrent 0 Subdivision Mao ❑ Planned Development 0 Variance ❑ Other: v. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Planned Development: (See Planned Development Rezcning Submittal Recuirements) B. Subdivision Map: (See Subdivision Map Submittal Recuirements) C. Anv Other Planning Permit: (See General Submittal Recuirements) . vI. PROCESSING (See_Pla razing Application Cover Letter) vii. REFERENCE PHONE NUMBERS Most questions related to the Planning Application should be directed to the Dublin Planning Department, however, some concerns might be addressed directly by another appropriate department or agency: 1. City of Dublin: 2. Dublin San Raman Services District: Building Inspection: (415) 829-0822 Fire: (415) 829-2333 Engineering: (415) 829-4916 Water, Sewer, Garbage: (415) 828-0515 Planning: (415) 829-4916 Police: (415) 829-0566 3. Zone 7 - Alameda County Flood Control: (415) 443-9300 • CITY OF 17U13LIt4 • PA No, • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM, 1h4TER1M (Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sec.) • The State CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines require the City to take an active role in preparing environ- mental documents. This comprehensive Environmental Assessment Form is designed to assist the City in preparing a complete and accurate environmental assessment in a timely manner and in conformance with the State CEQA Guidelines. The form has three sections : General Data, Exemption, and Initial Study. The applicant is requested to complete Section 1, General Data. The Planning Staff will prepare either Section 2, Exemption, or Section 3 , Initial Study. Please type or print legibly in ink. SECTION 1. GENERAL DATA - - - to be completed by the APPLICANT 1 . Name (if any) and address of project: Howard Johnson's 6680 Regional St. Vehicle rentals. Replacing Budget Car Rental who 2. Proposed use of property: served from this location for 12 years. 3. Name, address, and telephone of Applicant: Avcar Rentals 440 O'Farrell St. San Francisco, Ca. 94102 (415) 441-4779 -4. Name, address, and telephone of contact person D, in addition to applicant or D instead of applicant: Dan Mara 440 O'Farrell St. San Francisco. Ca. 94102 (415) 441-4779 5. Attached plans area preliminary or©fully developed. 6. Building area: 504 sq.ft. 7. Site area: 5.6 ❑ sq.ft. or acres. 8. Current zoning: Cc«nmerciai 9. Maximum Building Height 1 ❑Ft. orDstories. 10. Describe amount of daily traffic generated by number, type and time of day: . Traffic will be light and sooradic -from 7am to 7Dm M-F. 8-12 Sat. & Sun. 1 i . Number of off-street parking spaces provided: 20 12. Number of loading facilities provided: None -D g-etk9 - fVED r2 DUBUN PLANN:NG ;10 y ., 4 Ult,w -F.c,-':` f"y ; -e. , r ry y$ •, . 1Z,..rr ypffy.p r % • r, -5 a rt a s,rx , s�. e x4.,...140 "r+d:-.: a �r ro �'1,0; , - 1 +,/ tw � '{� '�P''p!' a nit%�E��..,5 �;; r� y^s '` rtS y, L tF ,. e �"7.�£ .,r'X«•t at. ^s 'Y`�M', r�fy4..eh��:x, '� .': ! T :.. t.,' 1, ,"1 arg G r :,Yt A - C �- ,1? , . 0r„{, l F ' ;k Y"`. P 4 - - i - � 07, i�ft;t 1p.,'gyr f �_�i-.$f�°' f+4f:.,.e �s k �✓*�.� r'r�t� s!' y i dr isW s.� " iP 1 .wl - .6 :.,..�. — ) ys ,1,4,. :,: ' r4-t' .�, " ` , `4�z!A- f 1,�4 ?tom a 3.yp <: t +3 , ..;7 1-a,>,�- : r � it,`,, ,.. ,•� n .r u Fi.`v 2 • aT ' -` ' am. , • E 1 .Xr a �i�F'�7 v' r :F t .{=alr •14, 4".7, �� r�'Sr { =r� r . .�{�. �� 4�� , t> rat rt'X '�x.r �'Y*nr 5 . 1 ,. r ,i .. Pp9 1 4'+ ) a aq ; f F• si l'L' :. '1,+v' y 'f' y,,.N. "'' ,{, 4 y.rk.1 ^it r Y - 4 S',V A 4 _ t w X R *°,u' r 0. c+. b•' rt +ter '' , d .w :. T t z: Ta> r .r'Syr.�}y6 "i. 4.'a R t/.a. t 'I�1.1 3 y •,{¢1 > i�•+,,,.R•w+''Sf+I�Ms ?�� .a�' +'*� j �j -:`f%. - A,.,--4 r� i ✓x, y,,ywar !'�-. ., r �d-,. '':?—'frt ¢4, r .. i,!, r' , € r 's: _ d°t YF X 4 4,4,„a§ T,,,afa ," '�"Fi ter.-i , 5 ` 1 j ,, r Y.. 'w. �. a tiLr , -''. '1V,0,1 i ', f 4.,,,1 -}' ', Fii r '*ttf f•' r1}`�f J - ....wNRS6N+�� r 1.0 r 13. Proposed development schedule: beginning: Now completion: Immediate • 14.a. IF residential: number of heel units N/A ; number of existing units ;number of new bedrooms ; unit sizes ;range of❑ sale prices or ❑resits ; type of dwelling i-lsingle family❑ duplex multiple. . • 14.b. IF commercial: scope of projectE neighborhood, El city, ❑ regional sales area 56 ❑ sq.ft. or❑ acre; estimated employment per shift 3 ; hours of operation 7am to 7pm M-F, 8-12 Sat. & Sun. . 14.c. If industrial: materials involved N/A ; estimated employment per shift hours of operation 14.d. If institutional: major function N/A ; estimated employment per shift estimated occupancy ;hours of operation 15. Describe City permits required:D Site eveloprn -- Keview; �l V�tii�ttince� 0 Adwthrils YtiivE. Ccvtditiovut,t tlse Ferrvt; 0 c(assi Tica�ficy.(fewniv,e3) ; C] P lav\vted oP Mevv;; I] Cc v\d i-t-i o vial use Fait; ❑ 5 5%4 c‘,N t ,- El Ot1tn2Y . LI Ii. 16. Describe other public approvals required: ❑ unknown; local agencies;❑ regional agencies;Elstate agencies; El federal agencies; far CERTIFICATION I 'Hereby certify that the information submitted is true ar.d correct to the best of my knowledge 1 I 1• and belief. I understand that the findings of this EnvircnmerltC Assessment apply only to the project as des ibed cbo'e. Signature: )c,,/ � �/ +� Date: L;/ 2 -�7/gT Name (print or type): ( DI E I E. 170c:4 • ...t} t .I' t,j 1: r� mo. * '':ems Y 1� {4 f. , *- <s< r S.E 3g L Y t r,T Y:-`as �' r:�r :� ' r .�, . .�. . y.x'. .���r ,� s *y ,b.: .k � : ,u xt� r3}'j#�ai�/4 (i .'f, s xR ..tea i t .IXI�a d.� - x' so x 4. . ,trY.414 .,+� � k �.r7 +� -i4 "' ‘ `� 6^♦. r h p wi"_ ty4+ ".•-'"tykt,-; . X r , 1r t-. ` t t1.04t '' y A4r n,V' x� � 1ik k' r 7 ir >e+' Y . • a '�Ha ,+/ �s1 ,4f ,Y ** F * ,• , �.rrL "a.- f D� p, ,,7 A- Ats} ,,,r„ f , ,., , . .... /Y l.T'' r R + > 3 ,_. y rJ R : „ ' 4i r « „, 2rs . 6pp ' '�,Y�€ �d`K� y` l •ri� �'s , ." a`,�s .ir�� ,tom' 1t � .. X4'rf�w �w" a t xt4a t, �r7 �': Yx414; n mo,d " " a,.YftY! 'e w 11.,, 3 r t" fsi-T� -, �� �r�k� ^+7 � :. i= rrW•a , -i � + : r , j �i Serving the Bay Area GP' P.O. Box 11148 �j is San Francisco Lza California 94101 RENTAL (415)441-4779 FEDERAL I.D.442264135 AUTOMOBILES STATION WAGONS PASSENGER VANS PICA-UP TRUCKS PARCEL TRUCKS CARGO VANS SAN FRANCISCO April 22, 1988 �0FaireIStreet ONSaUARE San Francisco.California 94102 (415)441-4779 City of Dublin -'SOUTH OF MARKET Planning Commission San FraSiw c:scoirn Street San F.�ant:sto.CA 94103 6500 Dublin Blvd. , Suite 205 (415)621.8989 S.F.AUTO CENTER/POTRERO Dublin, California 94568 161b a Brfaal S:eels San Francsco.CA 94107 (415)851.7866 To whom it may concern: NORTH BAY SAN RAFAEUMARIN COUNTY We are seeking approval to operate a vehicle rental office s80 Andersen Dr.ve an Rafaei.CA 94901 inside Howard Johnson's at 6680 Regional in Dublin. We would (415)459.2700 CORTE MADERA/MILL VALLEY be replacing Budget Car Rental who operated from this location 2130 RedAoae H.g,,„a, for 12 years. Our intent is to operate in a similar manner. GreeroraeG94 µ15)4614855 NOVATO/PETALUMA Parkingwould beprovided for us upon the Howard Johnson property 7401 Re CA 94-17 P P P Y Nora c:9r9.17 which has excess parking stalls beyond its need. We would (415)898-5600 occupy approximately 56 sq. ft. (7'x 8' ) of space within Howard SDOMAOU TY Johnson's lobby to transact contracts and answer phones. Our 'osa.CA ;e staff would total 5 full and part time with an average of 2-3 (7177)575-1600 people working a given shift. Hours of operation would be 7-7 BENECIIAA/PPII/NOLE weekdays and 8-12 Saturday and Sunday. Staff and hours may vary 1250 orga et ValIe.o.GA4590 some according to business and season. The traffic pattern (7177)6484188 should not verymuch from when Budget occppied this location. —FAOliver DNACAVILLE g PP rzoc Cher Baas Traffic would be light and sporadic. Fairea.C:94533 ' VW)425-2522 Our company can improve the quality of service for vehicle SOUTH LW - S.F.AIRPORTiBURUNGAME/ rental need in the area. Avcar was established in San Francisco SAN MATEO in 1974 and has 14 years of experience in serving the Bay Area, B ,g90 ai GA 94oaY we have taylored ourselves to those needs. We already have (415)148 s9ss many accounts in the Tri-Valley Area with an office in San Ramon SAN A CLARA/SANJ OSE for 4 years. Avcar feels our service will assuredly benefit the 560 Jose,ci 9510 City of Dublin and foresee no costs to the City in this plan. (408)2173536 __SAN JOSE/SO.VALLEY/ ALMADEN VALLEY I hopethis hasprovided the informationyou Should 22w::nC;,,,;dnue needed. San Asa TA 9E125 you need any additional information please call me at (415) (408)978-1555 441-4779. We will be happy to provide any information required I P_ MOUNTAIN ALOASUNNE W YVALE upon request.. 2566'.V E.Car-:.:no P q l,1a:;-:am',en, CA 94040 (415)941-0680 Thank you for your time. EAsrea _OAKLANOiALAMEDA S' ce ely, 1e_--._ CC t 0'and aCAA9 611 v�� , (415)451-6333 BERKELEYlALBANY Fc C X V E D Fain$:roe: ),,/ �,L_ Berke.ev.Ca?710 ,,� n (415)540.6920 DANIEL E. MARA a' t\ i' ``' .2 BERK tELEY/UCWord s:ree:s GENERAL MANAGER Ber'e ey.CA 94703 (415) 441-4779 DUBLIN FLANN:'O (415)845.1306 _CONCORDAVALNUT CREEK 1125 Detrat A-.-nue Concord.0a 9 520 DEM/mh (415)671.3774 DUBUN/PLEASANTON! LIVERMOREISAN RAMON 552 A:cos:a Mad San Raman CA 945M (415)833-8601 T , . , . , , - . __ - P 8S-otiZ AvcAR 1,0 tr6/nENr ,Kt: n<� Q _ __ - ' ''' i 1 es,�i�n,'�s, R= -D-3 C-1 s�..a.._PD r•.. . ,�-S -� c.�or,i.N,,u@I•. 0-20C- c I MIS L . - h - ,Su tj nlUSn 911111014, s' \\ zi',\-. 4 " :14011P,A \ C-2../7 L,..1- : N I Pd 1111#144.< 111 �, • ' r, ii n ° M[;l][N SCHOOL tit \e r ��� ���I�' R,� pup Ity '� R-1-I3-E -S:R-1 - ,�� WI" � v � 111114_ :r •�j'lll {i � < . 7,00041MUSA .R.S.P , t, _ 7 ______5 iai 2 " i. $%tt.. PA84-0U4 PD C-1 .. X, C.C.Ord.No.4.05 , ••'� • ' S.R.R.S•P. C.Or• P .No.'I4- � PA04-076 t � 'nU •42 :11#11111111)1 i rt., 3 R S.R.R.S. < 4. jG �NPD I f Q z __....\ ••:." Tipi � ,/-2 CIi \.R.R.S..P0 k- tea=_..) .� ....... ..�� C- • . . .. v .. _:rjik ., # 10U1110.• :1: 0 S J v. a %VA** 0..,\ ,.. .r;.P''' —--",0 4 : ° , ea?a.) R° nI / C1 , `R11-13- PD. 40 \Nik , +, s -.--1 Oq U1 •: 2 Z.U. ,'- `♦ /�'- _ _ CITY OF DUBLIt1 00'nityv C-0 r No.80-60 A �,___„ +�� '-- - ; ,...•.. ra:i ---------- -, 'tt`= -1 .A CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 6, 1988 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning StaffR5 IT SUBJECT: PA 88-031 The Good Guys Stereo Installation Facility Conditional Use Permit, 6700 Amador Plaza Road GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit request from The Good Guys to allow car stereo installation within the main building of the Enea Plaza Retail Complex on the west side of Amador Plaza Road. APPLICANT: Gregg Steele The Good Guys, Inc. 1649 Adrian Road Burlingame, CA 94131 PROPERTY OWNER: Enea Properties Company 6670 Amador Plaza Road Dublin, CA 94568 LOCATION: 6700 Dublin Boulevard ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-1500-40 PARCEL SIZE: 5+ acres GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial/Industrial-Retail/Office and Automotive SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: The Downtown Dublin Specific Plan designates land uses for this site as retail, office, hotel, restaurant and commercial recreation facilities. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: PD, Planned Development District, Specialty Retail/Office and Service Uses, Enea Plaza Retail Shopping Complex SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Restaurant, C-2, General Commercial District South: PD, Planned Development District, Vacant Lot East: Retail Auto Sales, C-2 West: PD, Planned Development District, Enea Retail Complex, Phase 1 COPIES TO: Applicant 8.1 Owner ITEM NO. File PA 88-031 ZONING HISTORY: 7/29/63: A Conditional Use Permit was issued for a drive-in theater over the entire 22+ acre Enea Plaza holding. 5/1/67 & 4/1/70: Conditional Use Permits were approved for an indoor theater at the northeast corner of the property. 5/3/79: A Parcel Map was approved to subdivide the property into five parcels. 10/22/80: A Site Development Review request was approved by Alameda County for the construction of six office buildings at the end of the Amador Plaza Road (four were constructed). 4/2/81: Approval was granted by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors rezoning the site from C-2, General Commercial District to a PD, Planned Development District allowing C-0, Administrative Office District uses including a racquetball club, gymnasium, restaurant and other C-1 Retail Business District uses that are determined to be compatible with C-0 uses (1464th Zoning Unit). 8/23/84: The Applicant submitted a Site Development Review application to construct a one-story retail building, a two-story retail and office building, and an addition to the existing theater. This application was found to be incomplete and no further action was taken on the application (PA 84-023). 2/25/85: The Dublin City Council denied a PD, Planned Development District Rezoning request to rezone the northerly 16.3 acres of the Enea Plaza holding to a PD, Planning Development District allowing C-1, Retail Business District type uses (PA 84-040). 9/25/86: The Dublin Planning Director approved a Site Development Review application for the construction of a three-building 42,000+ square foot single story retail complex (PA 86-071). 7/27/87: The Dublin City Council approved a rezoning request to rezone approximately 5.0+ acres from a PD, Planning Development District allowing C-0, Administrative Office District uses and a limited range of compatible C-1, Retail Business District uses to a new PD, Planning Development District allowing a range of retail shopper, office, personal service and financial uses, including Parcels A, B and a portion of C of Parcel Map 2922 (PA 87-018). 2/8/88: The Dublin City Council approved a Variance request appeal to establish a wall mounted business sign which is not located on a primary or secondary building frontage of the retail space which it proposed to identify. 3/28/88: The Dublin City Council approved a Planned Development Rezoning request to rezone the southern 3.0+ acres of APN 941-1500-040 (located on the west side of Amador Plaza Road near Dublin Boulevard) from a PD, Planned Development District (Alameda County Ordinance No. 81-26 for the 1464th Zoning Unit) to a new PD, allowing a range of retail, office, personal -2- n service and financial uses, identical to those permitted by City Council Resolution No. 41-87 and Planned Development Application PA 87-018. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: The Planning Department typically considers uses with drive-in activities through the Conditional Use Permit process in the C-1 Zoning District (Section 8-48.2). There is no land use designation for stereo installation facilities in the Planned Development District established for the subject site. The uses allowed in this PD are similar to those allowed in the C-1 zone. Staff has determined it would be appropriate to continue previously established processing procedures for stereo installation facilities by allowing the Planning Commission to consider this application through the Conditional Use Permit process. Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or peformance standards established for the district in which it is located. Section 8-94.4 states the approval of a Conditional Use Permit may be valid only for a specified term, and may be made contingent upon the acceptance and observance of specified conditions, including but not limited to the following matters: a) substantial conformity to approved plans and drawings; b) limitations on time of day for the conduct of specified activities; c) time period within which the approval shall be exercised and the proposed use brought into existence, failing which, the approval shall lapse and be void; d) guarantees as to compliance with the terms of the approval, including the posting of bond; e) compliance with requirements of other departments of the City/County Government. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project has been found to be Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Section 15301, Class 1, of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the June 6, 1988, hearing was published in The Herald, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. ANALYSIS: The Good Guys retail stereo and television sales store proposes to occupy 15,100+ square feet of floor area in Building B of the Enea Plaza Retail Complex (located on the northwest corner of Amador Plaza Road and Dublin Boulevard). As a service to their customers, The Good Guys propose to utilize 1,196+ square feet of floor area for the installation of car stereo equipment. This would occur as an accessory use to the retail sales activities. The automobile stereo installation facility would be located within the building in the back southwest corner of the structure. Installation will occur during store business hours (8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) seven days a week. Patrons would drive their vehicles into the building through a roll-up door -3- located on the southern elevation and be serviced within the confines of the structure. A maximum of three cars would be serviced at one time. No service activities would be allowed to occur outside of the building. Stacking of automobiles in the parking lot, in the driveway, in front of the roll-up door, and in all vehicle access isles would be prohibited. Although the use is not listed as either a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the Planning Development zoning for this site, it is Staff's opinion that it is an appropriate and necessary supplement service to the car stereo sales business. It is typical for businesses that sell car stereos to provide the installation service with the sales activity. This has been proven to be acceptable through the approval of similar conditional use permits for Circuit City and United Car Stereo. It is Staff's opinion that the proposed use supports the intent of the Planned Development District for this site and is in compliance with the goals and policies established in the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan and the Dublin General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take Testimony from the Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Resolution regarding PA 88-031 or give Staff and/or Applicant direction and continue the item to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. ACTION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit for The Good Guys, PA 88-031. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Draft Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit For PA 88-031 Background Attachments: 1. Applicant's Letter to Staff 2. Zoning and Location Map 3. Site Plan 4. Floor Plan 5. Elevations -4- RESOLUTION NO. 88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 88-031 THE GOOD GUYS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW CAR STEREO INSTALLATION WITHIN THE MAIN BUILDING OF THE ENEA PLAZA RETAIL COMPLEX AT 6700 AMADOR PLAZA ROAD WHEREAS, The Applicant, Gregg Steele of The Good Guys, filed an Application for a Conditional Use Permit to establish a car stereo installation facility in conjunction with the proposed Good Guys' store to be located at 6700 Amador Plaza Road. WHEREAS, this Application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and has been found to be categorically exempt; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report was submitted recommending conditional approval of the Application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 1988, to consider all reports, recommendations, and testimony. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find: a) The use serves the public need in that it provides an integral portion of the proposed electronics store operation. b) The use will be properly related to other land uses and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity and will be commensurate with the present use of properties in the neighborhood. c) The use, if permitted, under all circumstances and conditions of this particular case, will not materially adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, as all applicable regulations will be met. d) The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district in which it is to be located, in that conditions have been applied to ensure compliance with the Planned Development Zoning provisions established for this site and to ensure compliance with the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan and Dublin General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve PA 88-031 as shown by materials labelled Background Attachments 1 through 5 in the Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 6, 1988 on file with the Dublin Planning Department and subject to the following conditions: 1. This approval is for the installation of car stereo equipment for The Good Guys located in the Enea Plaza Retail Complex located at 6700 Amador Plaza Road. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be valid until June 16, 1990. If operation of the facility has not commenced by June 16, 1989, this approval shall expire. The approval period for the Conditional Use Permit may be extended up to one (1) additional year (Applicant must submit a written request for the extension prior to the expiration date of the permit) by the Planning Director upon his determination that the Conditions of Approval remain adequate to ensure that items a) through d) listed above as findings will continue to be met. 2. The signs shown on the elevation plans submitted to and dated received by the Planning Department on April 21, 1988 are not a part of this approval. EXHIBILEL 3. No garbage or debris are to be left around The Good Guys store at any time. 4. Car stereos being installed by this business shall not be played in a manner which is disturbing to patrons and businesses within this shopping center as well as within the general vicinity. 5. All stereo installation activities shall occur within the building. No installation activities shall occur outside of the building. 6. A maximum of three cars shall be serviced at one time. Cars shall not be stacked in the driveway in front of the roll-up door, in the parking lot or in any vehicular or pedestrian access isle at any time. 7. The days and operation of the car stereo installation shall be as described in the Applicant's written statement shown as Attachment 1 of the Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 6, 1988. 8. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for The Good Guys, the Applicant shall comply with all of the following Dublin San Ramon Services District Fire Department requirements as listed below: a) a 2A-10B fire extinguisher shall be supplied for every 3,000 square feet of floor area; b) the fire extinguishers shall be placed every 75 feet of travel distance; c) exits shall be maintained and properly marked; d) all automatic fire protection sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the DSRSD Fire Department for review; e) a final inspection will be required from the Fire Department prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for the stereo installation facility. 9. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for The Good Guys, the following security improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Dublin Police Services Department: a) interior security bars or grills shall be installed in all glass windows and doors in the stock room and sales area of The Good Guys tenant space; and b) an alarm system (sonic/listening type) shall be installed to at least cover the stock room and sales area of The Good Guys tenant space. 10. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1988. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -2- n t ,.,ed f$ APK 0^4j,/fIur t�i dt E, v r n E:s r tf�4 1t r ; k �,. N`1,;',.;"--a ra:Y r t r RN1R4'4 , "14 . t ki4p a 1A-4 1 "r cesv. 4 r , r yo .fr.r i .r. sa-� '� h° . ��" r r ,, T t�f Yr ,yy�j i. }e AS' � w • ��;�`�' 7;r��y�k't a A , ifs v-�tF'a�t�.,�t �-r4�. 9+ .:i'�y,•i -1.4,'A:F'��, AIt'k gp?:: A: t d u A ka.. c .A 7 x :4 %c,ri- ,e "f r P? ,,i :4 yr,64' S tl p,, r „ I,- +s R -4s,r.,-- , t� , y 4.?3.. $7, f e�ev; .:i y . ;Jt• . ,- i <4. A ;;r.^"cr3 yr - ...,r K.,, ; t. J the ood u s� OUR NAME IS OUR WAY Of DOING BUSINESS CORPORATE OFFICES • 1649 ADRIAN ROAD •BURLINGAME, CA 94010-2181 " (415) 259-5200 THE GOOD GUYS! ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CAR STEREO INSTALLATION April 20 , 1988 Through its fourteen stores , THE GOOD GUYS! offers an extensive selection of high -quality , brand- name products including televisions , video products , stereo components , personal electronics and car stereos. An integral and necessary service provided for our car stereo customers is the professional and convenient installation of the product on site. To provide this 1 service we design an installation facility within our premises. The following procedures are typical : 1 . All installation is performed inside the premises, not in the parking lot . i 2 . Installation is typically by appointment. Any vehicles waiting their turn are parked in the parking lot. No queuing is necessary. , 3 . The space is designed to accommodate two or three vehicles at one time. 3 4 4. Hours of installation are typically only during our regular 1 store hours , but no earlier than 8 : 00 a.m. nor later than 110 : 00 p.m. , seven days a week . i 1 5 . The facility is used for the installation and repair of new products purchased at THE GOOD GUYS! In order to maintain parity with our competitors, it is essential that we offer our car stereo customers a professional installation service. This service is vital to the selling of 7 car stereos. Because of the procedures we employ, there is no A disruption to the community and no expense to the City of Dublin. `' The community benefits by allowing a convenient installation facility for our customers which of course, aid sales and i consequently results in tax dollars . E� It is our understanding that the current zoning does allow this use and therefore THE GOOD GUYS ! respectfully requests the appropriate Use Permit . Respectfully, RECEIVED i THE GOOD GUYS! t1�R �.r i. I is i) ;I '88 03 1 DUBLIN FLANN?NG I 1 1 - ATTACHMENT I ........__ . . . _ • , , . .„..,,,.,,,,,„,.•....,. ._.„,,,..,„,„,,,,,:,,,_,,,„:„.„..„:„.,„.$ ;.. . .,. . .... ,.„:„.„,. „.„...,:. :,., tom. v u'+e •!{�,I" k,• ! ^`- C P. 4 r°rr`ti* •, `SF r y ". 'a+. ,.4` e�,� : - _ v-+v». ,..:0 .. �`a.i;..i` ,..�.•.•t .: ',,,,,.., 'N' ., a, I f IVI-I{ r PD v PD `\ \ . \ — w,/ • cr WJ 1411 Z.U. ' VX' ' „ \\\ \\\\41010, [ CT '• `�•. .II . •... C.C.Ortl. No. "V .5 A.C.Ord. No. i 9-82 i .q.;t ..a 0 4111 Vitir *ails I..... .\\.\\\\., 0 0.0 . Ay.. ,.„3... ,„,,,,,... I I�trilleililliall �F III "I ' 1��;� I� l► M_1 ��\'' Al. . = + 'C-2 \ \\ \\ AN RAMP. ... I I° % \\ \\\\ EA DRAM ill s. DiSTRiCT IM I it 0, ; \ \ ,,, Immo , \\\ M-1 Ittou::4 5 0 __, C-2 IMMIIM1 , o�° \\ \\ \ CEO � .a,\[r PD C.C. •r(I. (r. 111-8� \ \+\, R \ \ \ SCMOJI ` —'\ \ \ \ M-1 °tr° \ \ PD \\ \\\ 'M-1 PD .e' C-2 >. }—, \\ \ \\ \\\ •1491 Z.U. A.C. City OFFICES �;1. \ ` I4 1.a \ \ \ Ord.Nu. 8'I I WRUN ° s,r `�' d `�--r I a _=� ,4 Z.U. \\ \\\\` \ SPORTS " V \ GROUNDS cr _ \�% c N Or o. 81 '� \ + 2 t, I M_1 C-2 s C. / \� �' \ /j -\ •.��� _ ----_ _-11 •� _—�:�I Ir�J•� cam i - --- ---�� /// 0 Z U Lu ice\ �, 1 L M- 11` \ iI ''' i�_i� � �� \\+ / \ r O C \��\\\\� /�\ \\ \\ \\ i CITY OF DUBLIN e ....... I ....... —___ '`\\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ BASE NAPS % O \� \ \ 1 • WC u,uurw,•�rnwo�. ill§.10 ‘ \ \ \ . , \ \ \ \\ a tod »d _.. IU App \\ \\\% 1\ ,,,;, at , ‘ , , , , , , • , 2 r-- — 1 1 scALE feu '' \ \ \ \. "•".o" CI4FFT ICES -.tip , . L k is li) stir M'...r • .' . P�rBa 11:WR1. I rot i..Mrwr.i:r a .6 .r ASSOCIATES ♦ � NlV/hr \� ,'Nadw"ypU �fswiA werV)I ...,-p, `` 1p \Y WSJ . • LIA•••• 1 I = • 1 I \ /I I / \ I A' I I X I I--I--- IL a04' _—Sci it t�- --a. Woo .ri.r-�.; n.-.+ a.4° _ „i.. h, -�-. �tiL—_ —J V t TMH QOQQ OtJY85 ( , [ I ,.., 1 II 11.101.501.11110111MT• Ca* I 1 f �4.1 . 11 LJ I I ` * OUBLIN wwerw' _� M�,�*ex.., p +,w+ownw. 0 STORE IIIVESSMI ` Prt. .. Lu1.:...,W.Y., C �. _- n..Asa ►i.m�+a. II M�7�r n� r „I,• V - i .0,,,. a Z SZMI I I d I Co.louLTAM: 1 i ll - - --------------- _ L auwnT TM... I „.,/.. perc 104.1* fit., 1-0crilor4 rowfrri 4111, t —/ OP s \\\\\\\\\\\\ ) ( nrYy�r� �"/ • R ii0' ///// / ////////// / � ® oramwra: wSNOW/ //// //////////� I - ' q elle PLAT LOCATION PLAN arATtt:ylg/e! ar r • 1 #` 1 nr GAR, .,,, I:: ',7 •4 STE lkto ,_1' INGrAtLAriog t ___ _ gp r � pA. _. •-. 1 4' i El • • • I. n a a 1 1 \ 0 ,]' . . . .i 11 0 i rif ! tl : • Q -o : 'a 0 to , 00 fIn _ 4 I 1 ` . i I • s+E1111111 wINwat. 2E 1 Q T I © O 5 O Q A -1 TE. - 1...� �.,.. -- MI00■*Lars KN 1 MD --- lit I I � • ♦■7'-1 'ItJ 1111111011 • - WO...IO.MI'a.11LiD- .,I, I , ' • \Alit,* 'rwT�N..LSSJ TILT y co cowl. •.... aMIo - , .IX.R,1L. i Z . = CMI4 ut V4Mr.R GRN■41 .I.M TOR' gfR DIf�GK ��cu�N A-it k +���d ♦.,..N ■i \ _� I _(r^'Sr s! :is-d 1� I ..ID.i' cia tin 1 el '0 I 71dE DOOO al/YB! • rr.wr rwIc«1 --1 — •'�_.d1 ae .Mamma,.�a lama,... / rilin- i IMAI _ v td-d Flu rya. �J .. +o ( / Ou BLIN • • �`ta"Qb°an"La '� �� a�.rmnl ��J STORE MIL.r.Tao4 liggC SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELnVATIp1( . L O O © O O q 4 5 ® �" I riMrn. • PLAT&LaSD r,LMI 1 GILL LIT PI. MN ram• I ! . t` I I — • Oa ..�i L14MI OP • D■NIYD I ��a-n. �. I ... - -_ am .. WV growl 1 I y— • I- . /}1 a — .... 1__—__.____1 .` 1 i 1 1 -( I S E 5r �l��oF• MIaalf DIPS Mir•4 J / j'' Iwo- noibi 44 3 0 v'ar'�8 1 pawl' AI'1 IGO r1 1a. WEST ELEVATION , ( r O -- r _ O O LWMI O. IOOr NMYO CF1 / /I Ir_� wnclK , O I O O ._.OLDSR MI RGMIK rruglN) -nit u.a.o TL. Q OI � 4 I-I !! rcraa a•.-r.aal(r/-r-.) ! Sl 1I w• uW / ® AI ' ►'m i If 4; � • c.i A l.. I T, dal- •�_' 4. -4,r 1 �, ' 8 � lid.{-.t1'M_o�I�E� ..Lpm NI MIll e IlVin' 71' -I�i iimmimaiittimwi 1:satai " 1_110111111a il.t1111W3=2 -01. A .i • KL4.r KwrK.-MISS *LIMY MI :- AI 1.i Oh.• S4LIl rMI,O , M�.SO OMR. T.} MILO S.Y • j`AOT ELEVATION ' Pi "■ w . «Ira I 4'.• • 1 CITY OF DUBLIN AGENDA STATEMENT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: June 6, 1988 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Training Session EXHIBITS ATTACHED: None RECOMMENDATION: II: Determine the appropriate date and time FINANCIAL STATEMENT: None DESCRIPTION: Several Planning Commissioners have suggested that a Planning Commmission Training Session be scheduled. Staff suggests that the Planning Commission determine the most appropriate date and time. Two possible training session dates are Wednesday, June 8th and Wednesday, June 15th. COPIES TO: ITEM NO. Cl. j