Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-19-1990 PC Agenda AGENDA CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting - Dublin Civic Center Monday - 7: 30 p.m. 100 Civic Plaza, Council Chambers March 19, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER 2 . ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 4. ADDITIONS OR REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA 5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING - March 5, 1990 6. ORAL COMMUNICATION - At this time, members of the audience are permitted to address the Planning Commission on any item which is not on the Planning Commission agenda. Comments should not exceed 5 minutes. If any person feels that this is insufficient time to address his or her concern, that person should arrange with the Planning Director to have his or her particular concern placed on the agenda for a future meeting. 7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8.1 PA 89-143 Valley Dodge Conditional Use Permit request to erect a 26' tall double-faced freestanding sign and Site Development Review request to erect new wall signs and directional signs located at 6015 Scarlett Court 8.2 PA 90-005 Cantori Second Dwelling Unit Conditional Use Permit to allow a second unit consisting of 1,175 square feet of floor area and a Variance request to allow the structure to exceed the 598 square foot maximum permitted under the City' s Zoning Ordinance located at 7859 Ironwood Drive 9 . NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS 10. OTHER BUSINESS 11. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS' CONCERNS 12. ADJOURNMENT (Over for Procedures Summary) CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff lr PREPARED BY: Ralph Kachadourian, Assistant Planner/Zoning Investigator \ SUBJECT: PA 89-143 Valley Dodge Signs CUP/SDR GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit request for Freestanding Sign and Site Development Review request for Wall Signs. APPLICANT: Robert Rogers Barber Sign Company 600 Pennsylvania Avenue Vallejo, CA 94590 PROPERTY OWNER: Valley Dodge 6015 Scarlett Court Dublin, CA 94568 LOCATION: 6015 Scarlett Court ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-550-32-3 PARCEL SIZE: 1.5 + acres GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park/Industrial: Outdoor Storage ITEM NO: g• t COPIES TO: Applicant Owner File PA 89-143 PAGE-L.OF I. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: M-1 Light Industrial (Auto Dealership) SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: M-1, Light Industrial (Ryder Mini Storage) South: Scarlett Court/I-580 (Freeway) East: M-1, Light Industrial (Lumber Sales/Storage) West: M-1, Light Industrial (Scottsman Manufacturing Co.) ZONING HISTORY: March 23, 1982: A Site Development Review application was approved for a 9,800+ square foot office. February 6, 1984: A Conditional Use Permit to establish two car dealerships (Datsun/Nissan and Buick Dealerships) was approved by the Dublin Planning Commission (PA 84-001). August 7, 1984: A Site Development Review for the site improvements proposed under PA 84-001 was approved by the Planning Director (PA 84- 017). September 10, 1985: Planning Director approved PA 85-076 Valley Nissan Administrative Conditional Use Permit for 30-day sales promotion tent. October 4, 1985: Planning Director approved PA 85-084 Valley Nissan Administative Conditional Use Permit for temporary promotional advertising. March 3, 1986: Planning Commission approved PA 86-002 Valley Volvo Auto Dealership Conditional Use Permit/Site Development Review. July 25, 1986: Planning Director approved PA 86-077 Valley Nissan Administrative Conditional Use Permit for temporary promotional advertising. May 1, 1987: Planning Director approved PA 87-061 Valley Nissan Administrative Conditional Use Permit for temporary promotional signs for 3-day time frame. November 21, 1988: Planning Director approved PA 88-131 Valley Nissan/Volvo Administrative Conditional Use Permit for 30-day promotional roof-top balloon. -2- PAGE e1..OFIa. February 13, 1989: Planning Director approved PA 89-018 Valley Mitsubishi Administrative Conditional Use Permit for 30-day promotional roof-top balloon. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8-87.33 Wall Signs and Projecting Signs establishes maximum height, width and area permitted for wall signs and makes provisions for increases in the limitations through the Site Development Review process. Section 8-87.60 (D) of the City's Zoning Ordinance provides an exception to the 20-foot maximum sign height requirement whereby single use parcels one and one-half (1-1/2) acres or greater may utilize a sign up to 35 feet subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district in which it is located. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project has been found to be Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Section 15311, Class 11 (a) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. This use consists of placement of on-premise signs accessory to an existing commercial facility. NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the March 19, 1990, hearing was published in the local newspaper mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. ANALYSIS: The Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to erect a 26 foot tall freestanding sign and Site Development Review for a new wall mounted sign at Valley Dodge, 6015 Scarlett Court. The proposed double-faced freestanding sign is setback approximately 60 feet from the front property line. The proposed sign will be 12 feet x 10 feet with a total of 240 square feet of sign area (120 square feet per face) as indicated on plans marked Exhibit B. The sign ordinance allows a maximum of 300 square feet of sign area (150 square feet per face). The Applicant also proposes a wall-mounted sign on the primary building frontage. The "Dodge" sign (as indicated on Exhibit B) will be similar in size and height to an already existing "Valley" wall sign. Both the existing -3- PAGE-3 OF la "Valley" sign and the proposed additional "Dodge" sign will have a total sign area of 110 square feet. The sign ordinance allows a total of 132 square feet with Site Development Review as per Section 8-87.33(B) of the sign ordinance. The Applicant will be erecting four (4) directory signs on the site as shown on Exhibit C. These signs are permitted as per Section 8-87.50(E) of the sign ordinance and do not require approval of a Conditional Use Permit or Site Development Review. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and the Site Development Review for the proposed freestanding sign and wall mounted sign. RECOMMENDATION: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Resolutions relating to PA 89-143 or give Staff and Applicant direction and continue the item. ACTION: Adopt draft resolutions approving PA 89-143 Valley Dodge Conditional Use Permit (Exhibit D) and Site Development Review (Exhibit E) requests. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Sign Locations Exhibit B: Freestanding Sign and Wall Sign Exhibit C: Directory Signs Exhibit D: Draft Resolution for Conditional Use Permit Exhibit E: Draft Resolution for Site Development Review Background Attachments: Attachment 1: Site Location -4- PAGE L.OF L.- - ; ' • JR 1 a _2- s'-L ) J �II1 - 2�$_L' •• II . Will dV' a. • _ -,rRfC`N4 I. . 1 . III t '` III P s��vrrE/��r trx e • • { S/bA! © I. r ",„s -'.I 4 J 1 ✓aLL �N/SSR,.L .a��� Boo J Inc' : Mil/w:OFFiC£S J a I h1 —. _ I. e �-�CYY � V SA1-E3 LOT! \ ..._._. . ' C' v S�LFIi Lr�T N. viS�mfna oekui� n - '.1' . • . . .„. •._ , �. -• . - GO'-L BARBER SIGH CO. !NC RECEIVED „_ 600 PENNSYLVANIA ST. • _E0I5 .. .A/'[ rT. c«�RT- 40'`-' ._ P.O. VALLEJO1446 OCA 94590 MAR -7 1990 (707) 642.2233 ed% FAX 707 642-6206 J ( ) DUBLIN PLANNING ti • el I' WA/rr.c f'.¢co ov . RED 8� r-4 IL Afn co"' on/ � `. LI�� 2 wroir ,Ci. /2 y a� .� I771-00- -rlr!ack . , , a' \\ ,.,,,, a U /'", %,% .. • „ Z .3 to _, 1 . , ,....,,,.. ,,.. ,,,,, .., 1 yyG-%/ SA/ELE✓ -.A/F. ./0-1 sc«tf- -- /' Ilg c4L/F,.CERr f/EO Fo Y2/ D5rd/L f iD.EA r'oR R/;2,. 28n7- c I , ,'1ED ffIGE PR4Pui7 /,0 5/C,n/ I /c2-02EScEt1T%u/I a/Se r2NNe-<T O SKi/'lCJ-/- u/i.APiDXo✓. .D-P2o✓,LlE , BARBER SIGN CO. INC. RECEIVED '' ' 600 PENNSYLVANIA ST. P.O. BOX 1446 MAR -7 1990 VALLEJO, CA 94590 (707) 642-2233 DUBLIN PLANNING PAX (707) 642-6206 f T.,RT SERVICE;.. r. ___.__ TII/s S!(7N Nor- /it/ 6 - 4 r� EXHIBIT a 4fj2✓/ d ,?4 r5 RA/. Ni53.e l. Pah__OF a. 4,,rsU F/F✓a-f,f /- /"- /;,' !/d/F - - - ......, „....... 40v4P -{ ©T i` — ;•,/11 T 'B" -. - J�O._- t17._ 1 i i - '` 2' 1if/��/T,E o. / L ley I I S �I- I r Q�I� p,�/ 1 - I/[//f/T� 04/ v�N�rE P,G. r Cv ' 1 i1J L .Ca, / ( 10 g . )11., t.4. _ • .. 4 p/QEG r/bmL L S_/C,A./.-s_ C _..7._...D_. � ._. r)- Py___c/6z 4E.�.p /__ _ G- ,zp,� c,.v 1 • - TJo U66 Pal/2T'� PT, f -_- -------------- -----__��_---- .,cis/.. k" Q,G� a), C.o17/ <4 Doz,4,C PA IZL-5__pEt'r . I =A - 1 1 . E NTEr!... d4 1• 1 __ 0 5/bA E /V .....o; off'/ s •4E T= - - 2 ' Y 4 / - /t/4,4/-./LLG/a,- fZ.i-JM/4!, /„F/2ARA6 .T /a .. xisT-t,t' _..._F4�"/4 __ ___ _--- : RECEIVED MAR - 7 1990 BARRPD orn•. ..... __- • DUBLIN PLANNING EXHIBIT C PAGE.,OF.L2. RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 89-143 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A FREESTANDING SIGN AT VALLEY DODGE DEALERSHIP AT 6015 SCARLETT COURT WHEREAS, Barber Sign Co., Inc., representing Valley Dodge filed an application for a Conditional Use Permit to locate a new freestanding sign to exceed the 20 foot height limit on the site at 6015 Scarlett Court; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said application on March 19, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has been found to be categorically exempt under Section 15311, Class 11(a); and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the application be conditionally approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find: 1. The use is required by the public need in that it provides business identification to the general public for a new auto dealership facility in the City of Dublin. 2. The use will be properly related to other land uses and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity, as it will be commensurate with the present use of properties in the industrial zoning district. 3. The use, if permitted under all of the circumstances and conditions of this particular case, will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the area as all applicable regulations will be met. 4. The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district in which it is to be located. The use is consistent with the intent of the zoning district and with the General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby conditionally approve PA 89-143 Valley Dodge freestanding sign as shown on the plans labeled Exhibit B, submitted to the Planning Department on March 7, 1990, and subject to the following conditions of approval: EXHIBIT 12 PAGE 8 ;;F 1L2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 1. PA 89-143 Conditional Use Permit is approved for one double faced freestanding sign which shall generally conform to the following dimensions: a. Maximum Sign Area: 240 square feet (120 square feet per face) b. Maximum Sign Height: 26 feet c. Front Setback: 60 feet The sign shall be located within the landscaped planter area as indicated by Exhibit A. 2. All landscaping within the planter area shall be maintained in a viable and well kept manner at all times. 3. All building permits for the proposed freestanding sign shall be secured and construction commenced within six (6) months of the date of approval of this use permit. The Applicant and/or property owner shall comply with all applicable building code requirements. 4. Any modifications to said freestanding sign shall be subject to review and approval of the Dublin Planning Department. 5. This approval shall become null and void, in the event the approved use ceases to operate for a continuous one-year period. 6. This use shall be subject to Zoning Investigator review and determination as to compliance with the conditions of approval. 7. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8- 90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of March, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -2- PAGE OF L • RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 89-143 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED WALL SIGN AT VALLEY DODGE DEALERSHIP AT 6015 SCARLETT COURT WHEREAS, Barber Sign Co., Inc., representing Valley Dodge filed an application for a Site Development Review to allow a new wall sign on the site, to exceed maximum permitted letter height at 6015 Scarlett Court; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said application on March 19, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has been found to be categorically exempt under Section 15311, Class 11(a); and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending the application be conditionally approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find: 1. The use is required by the public need in that it provides business identification to the general public for a new auto dealership facility in the City of Dublin. 2. The use will be properly related to other land uses and transportation and service facilities in the vicinity, as it will be commensurate with the present use of properties in the industrial zoning district. 3. The use, if permitted under all of the circumstances and conditions of this particular case, will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity or be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the area as all applicable regulations will be met. 4. The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district in which it is to be located. The use is consistent with the intent of the zoning district and with the General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby approve PA 89-143 Valley Dodge Site Development Review for an additional internally illuminated wall sign as shown on the plans labeled Exhibit B, submitted to the Planning Department on March 7, 1990, and subject to the following conditions of approval. EXHIBIT E. PAGE ur I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits or establishment of use, and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 1. PA 89-143 Site Development Review is approved for one internally illuminated "Dodge" wall sign which shall generally conform to the following: a. Primary Frontage: south elevation b. Maximum letter Height: 30 inches c. Maximum Sign Length: 18 feet d. Maximum Sign Area: 45 square feet The new sign will be part of the existing "Valley" wall sign. 2. All signs are to be well maintained in an attractive manner and in accordance with the approved plans. All indirect light fixtures are to be glare shielded. 3. Any additional signage utilized on this site shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation. All existing banner signs are to be removed. 4. All mounting holes from previous signs shall be repaired and walls repainted prior to mounting the proposed signs. 5. Building Permits for the proposed signs shall be secured and construction commenced within six (6) months after approval of this application or said approval shall be void. 6. This use shall be subject to Zoning Investigator review and determination as to compliance with the conditions of approval. 7. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8- 90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of March, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -2- PAGE.LL..OF 162. •1 i\\\ �—r I -y • .43 / •/ " / //• _� 1 / ,' 1 to I , 1 - , 1 11 1 ; , / I 1;1 ,c• lr I f a 14 it e. . ami t , i . 1 / an i / M i CR 1 i V. CD I I 1 , I� •� I 1, I r• __ t i DOUGHERTY�`` �^ _ 4 i ; I it y !till g , 1 4 G. /4 . , 0 • ?i ( LJ r 3 r+ { F z wilIP ^a•i 1 N n a r---1 z A > lin n��` 1�-. z j m I in 1 m v7i 02 O N ^. ri c > I n �1 ca m 1 e. 0 7 1 m _ OpaI• " y Weft r" 1 N \ 1 ..... pp - 1 \\ n n r \co jL : v c►V> z C \ z _ _ NIQ 1 ♦. N N N 1 LXCI Ip X x . C ----------...--\/......„_)„."___/// r-i TASSAJARA RD. ATTACHMENT 11§.__ 5rTE t a t 3 4 CJVLoCA11 o4 ..(..R[p/p, I•,�..,T°., A PART OF THE _ r` ` K40 SANTINA �w ZONING MAP m i' c -'f:: F. c CITY OFau....1.... - = DUBLIN I THOMPSON INc. THE CITY OF �- li E � c m DUBLIN m e -�- ` , z IW.n..:._a..A C......a c.nw....wf1/ �` �1,RIN (Al IiORYIA PAGE La.OF Z CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff kir }� REPORT PREPARED BY: Charlie Haims, Project Planner C I.' SUBJECT: PA 90-005 Cantori Second Unit Conditional Use Permit and Variance request at 7859 Ironwood Drive GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Variance request to allow a second unit consisting of 1,175 square feet of floor area at 7859 Ironwood Drive. A Variance is required in that the proposal exceeds the 598 square foot maximum permitted under the Zoning Ordinance. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: Carlo Cantori 7859 Ironwood Drive Dublin, CA 94568 LOCATION: 7859 Ironwood Drive ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 941-169-44 PARCEL SIZE: 12,000 + square feet GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential (6.1 to 14.0 units per acre) EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: Zoning: R-1-B-E, Single Family Residential Combining District Land Use: Single Family Residential COPIES TO: Applicant/Owner File PA 90-005 ITEM NO. O•X PAGE OFF SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: R-1-B-E, School site South: R-1-B-E, Single Family Residential East: R-1-B-E, I-680 West: R-1-B-E, Single Family Residential APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: City Ordinance No. 5-84 establishes regulations relating to second units in the R-1 District. The Ordinance adopted in February, 1984 establishes minimum lot size, unit size, location, parking design, coverage, occupancy, and setback (see Attachment 1 for specific regulation). Section 8-26.3 requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the use of a second unit. Section 8-93.0 establishes the procedure for granting Variances and establishes the findings of fact which must be made affirmatively. Section 8-94.0 states that conditional uses must be analyzed to determine: 1) whether or not the use is required by the public need; 2) whether or not the use will be properly related to other land uses, transportation and service facilities in the vicinity; 3) whether or not the use will materially affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity; and 4) whether or not the use will be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the district in which it is located. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This project has been found to be Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Section 15303, Class 3(a) and Section 15305, Class 5 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Guidelines consisting of the conversion of existing small structure (single family residence) which does not exceed the maximum permitted structures on the parcel and consists of minor alteration of land use limitations (Variance). NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the March 19, 1990, hearing was published in the local newspaper, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in public buildings. ANALYSIS: The Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Variance for a second dwelling unit in a single family residential neighborhood. The Applicant has constructed a 1,175+ square foot attached addition to the back of the existing home. This addition contains separate kitchen, sleeping and bathroom facilities, which makes this addition a second unit. Building permits were issued for the construction of this addition on November 17, 1988. Both the building permit and plan contain a note from the Building Inspector dated November 15, 1988, which indicate that the addition was not -2- PAGE s2._OF approved as a second unit and that the sink and freezer were not approved on that plan (Attachment 2). This permit expired on November 17, 1989 and was given a 60 day extension at that time in order to get the Conditional Use Permit approved for the second unit. The Applicant subsequently submitted a Conditional Use Permit Application to the Planning Department on January 16, 1990. During an attempt to renew the building permit, the Building Inspector included a note on the permit and plan dated February 1, 1990 which states that the kitchen must be removed prior to final inspection (Attachment 2). A comparison of the Applicant's proposal with the Ordinance's minimum criteria is as follows: Applicant's Ordinance Standards Proposal Status Lot Size 6,000 sq ft minimum 12,000+ sq ft complies w/Ord. Limitation one second unit per complies w/Ord. any one R-1 lot. Size 35% of existing floor 1,175+ sq ft exceeds max. area, with 275 sq ft permitted in minimum and 1,000 Ord. Modify sq ft maximum. floor plan to 35% x 1,707+ = 598 sq ft comply or Variance req'd. Location Front Yard: 20' min Located in rear complies w/Ord. Side Yard: 6' min portion of lot. Rear Yard: 20' min 25' to east side- yard. 55' to west sideyard. 45' rear yard. Parking 3 off-street parking Applicant proposes complies w/Ord. spaces (2 for the to locate one parking principal dwelling space (for the second unit & 1 for the 2nd unit) in the east side unit. yard in addition to one inside garage and one in driveway. Design Designed to maintain Second Unit situated complies w/Ord. appearance of a in rear of and single family attached to existing dwelling. New unit. Second unit entrances not to be not visible from street. visible from the street. -3- PAGE 3 OFF Coverage A 60% maximum for 24% (2,882+ sq ft) complies w/Ord. principal and second unit. Occupancy Owner of property The Applicant has complies w/Ord. must be an occupant owned and resided in with a min. 6-month the principal unit occupancy of prin- since 1985. cipal residence prior to applying for second unit approval. Setback A detached 2nd unit Not applicable, 2nd N/A must be a min. of 10 unit is attached to feet from principal existing structure. unit. A minimum age limit is not specifically required in the City's Second Unit Ordinance for occupancy of the unit. However, on previous second unit applications (such as PA 87-024 Schwartz), the Planning Commission required recordation of a Deed restriction requiring occupancy of one of the two units by "a person or persons 60 years of age or older or by a handicapped person or persons". The Applicant proposes to have his parents occupy the second unit. The ages of his parents are 65 and 64 years old which complies with this requirement. As the chart indicates, the Applicant's proposal is inconsistent with the criteria established in the Second Unit Ordinance in that the total floor area of the addition is 69% of the existing floor area rather than a maximum of 35%. The main reasons for the 35% maximum were 1) so that the second unit would clearly be subordinate to the principal dwelling unit, as indicated in the definition in the ordinance (see Attachment 1) and 2) to protect the single family character of the neighborhood. In order to use the addition as a second unit, a Variance to the size criteria is required. Prior to granting a Variance, three mandatory findings of fact must be made. These include: 1. That there are special circumstances relating to physical charactistics (such as lot size, shape and topography), which would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by others in the identical zoning district. No special circumstances relating to physical characteristics apply to the property so that strict application of the City Ordinance does not deprive the property of rights enjoyed by other properties. The property is similar in location and topography to other properties in the vicinity. The property is a flat, residential lot located in an R-1-B-E zoning district, which allows the Applicant to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for a second unit within the limitations of the Ordinance. -4- PAGE OF 2. That the granting of the application will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and zone. Authorization of the Variance will constitute a grant of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity in that all properties must comply with the City's Zoning Ordinance regulating the size of second units unless all three mandatory findings of fact are made affirmative. Granting a Variance for the Applicant's second unit, which is 50% larger in area than permitted, constitutes a grant of special privilege as all the findings cannot be made. 3. That the Variance will not be detrimental to persons or property in the neighborhood or to the public welfare. Authorizing the Variance will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. Although the size of the second unit deviates greatly from the Ordinance, it cannot be found that this deviation would affect neighboring persons or property. The Planning and Building Staff have determined that the addition could comply with the 2nd Unit Ordinance if the downstairs addition would be used as part of the existing structure and only the upstairs addition would be used as a second unit. The main dwelling unit would then have approximately 2,250 square foot (1,707 sq.ft. + 546 sq. ft.) and the second unit would have approximately 625 square feet. The applicant would need to remove the kitchen (sink and cook top) from the downstairs, rebuild the stairway, and may need to rearrange the upstairs floor plan. The approximately 625 square foot second unit would comply with the 35% size criteria of the ordinance. Staff has identified two other directions that the Planning Commission could pursue: 1) request the City Council to study increasing the 35% size criteria in the ordinance, or 2) produce facts to support the three mandatory findings. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Conditional Use Permit including a condition that only the upstairs addition may be used as a second unit. The Staff further recommends that the Variance be denied because Staff could not produce facts to support the three mandatory findings. RECOMMENDATION: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Adopt Resolutions relating to PA 90-005, or give Staff and Applicant direction and continue the matter. ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the draft resolution (Exhibit B) denying the Variance request and adopt the draft resolution (Exhibit C) approving the Conditional Use Permit for PA 90-005. -5- PAGE OF ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Floor Plan and Elevations Exhibit B: Draft Resolution Denying Variance request Exhibit C: Draft Resolution Approving the Conditional Use Permit request Background Attachments: Attachment 1: City Ordinance No. 5-84 Attachment 2: Building Permit Attachment 3: Site Photographs Attachment 4: Draft Covenant for Occupancy and Tenant Restrictions Attachment 5: Site Plan Attachment 6: Applicant's Written Statement -6- PAGE L Of 2l'.4" " • • 1 5%4.1 5'.Co" I NOSE GPllrxer, /oNTO 00Na _1"jlty a' t I2o -- brL3H.bLK L_�H C0040 t 120 3o2G 46.pM (m mil. , .55'5 t!4 pil +v/ KA IATOIi r/gI; .<:). 1 p yCNT ;AAA S S� �al� y�P vF---i 1a•11 INeyL N 12-'—' • FAMILY (UNGy 9TAIK) EX-r ALL L:XTCK•WAI Q PLIas HAtebWv. / r,•rr.ex,.t!WALLS (m ��LEA le)WM,H•b s`, bAhE TIaIAA, vrAINT GEILG. F 4 ' I AFIteEt5 WALL5,GLCe.I Intirr tr. Iv KC-1.4CAc rivre1, le I `Cl../ . . 1 I S • - \ 4 le. i4_ F 1 10 r '4 1 I 5'• to" 5'•Co" \ 2'•ti"' • • I1. I-= ;11e3- 1 &AK 0 i �y i 61NK .� ( i DA1¢• UTILI1 ( L is N � N I to l �/ to IN,5AMG A5 vire.fAA-*. 6 n :rD n c7 F, cob?.I12 CIbD 0 i/ / . __ 1/iiizl P, in _ V/ti V 7/77/fi1/7 / n 1 1 T Li ) / \\ ICPr roVG(e) / t 3' " `� VK. fn WINbOW I / -- —�-- ---------- -/ / -,c4! —y-r r4, ,4t 1 / • I I-Ae. PLA6. / ISKYt�o 4E I (E)Ho u sE> 19KYboh I / I I ( 11a I / RECEIVED /,// 1(C)�`xr.EAt�r+ ore,. JAN 1 6 1990 - L 0 W E k ExHian. A DUBLIN PLANNING E le_ L E V E L Pf qo-ooS 1/4 `1,.0 PAGE 2._OF¢ - . 4-Co.0 5a.p-(. • • a/ T . / n 12'. 4 ri'.v^� 2,.g" 5% 4" ,• 9� Go' '1 • IQODF LINE"Z I Como 9D2t 1 1 • i _ L I N• • x44 SMW I STU p10 55 1I, FNSMb Ab MDKi ' 7r A I t .46 I -. � 0 rr ,4-1 .1 (� 2CoCo5 J� • L $ ��F I I J d --, /....1 -k /j� d I O PM �11 roc/ �Il. i (11) �2CoCo8 K d� rat tl*" I =LP / 03 1�, ►� , �I �NSTK._t3ED 1¢M. L I1: 1 -._ •FLKsGnKI'G7 -....... ,.m /_ ,,,,-..,--- 6AE,TIQIM:wri PAINT --(P dr" 22 - _ M wALLS,GLa.: f/2�"GYr..1/0 AT ' TAPD,TGXT) ,Acee5 . `� FLA 0 %sINT -L___41L O 24to8 6G div fn ' - -"'AV./ / m 5 a` I 5 \ 5 T U.tL`( N \\\ M�KGAS oo t0 1- "`_ I Q) lSLbe. f 1,6 I G LO'✓,(FrN.bANG AS MDR) 6ELpw �Cd ,,e r�:—i rA&i `V) 41 V. r NOTE:AI..I&N.4(E)WALL (yM OKIGKGT R•ti Iti&UL.�v15EPo PE- R Tr . t. __K _ _.L E__ V -f; L_ cXTEK.Au./�u s 1/,4" . ('•0a .5 5a.FT. RECEIVED JAN 1 6: 1990 DUBLIN ALANiviNG 1l -oos • . PAGE&OF RESOLUTION NO. 89 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DENYING PA 90-005 CANTORI VARIANCE REQUEST TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA PERMITTED FOR A SECOND UNIT (SECTION 8-60.58.1) AT 7859 IRONWOOD DRIVE WHEREAS, Carlo Cantors filed a Conditional Use Permit and Variance application to allow the use of a second unit and for that second unit to exceed the maximum floor area permitted; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing on said application on March 19, 1990; and WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has been found to be categorically exempt; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the application for a Variance be denied; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find: 1. That no special circumstances relating to physical characteristics apply to the property so that strict application of the City Ordinance does not deprive the property of rights enjoyed by other properties, as the property is similar in location and topography to other properties in the vicinity. The property is a flat, residential lot located in an R-1-B-E zoning district, a situation which allows the Applicant to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for a second unit within the limitations of the Ordinance. 2. That authorization of the Variance will constitute the grant of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity in that all properties must comply with the City's Zoning Ordinance regulating the size of second units unless all three mandatory findings of fact are made affirmative. Granting a Variance for the Applicant's second unit, which is 69% of the existing floor area rather than 35%, constitutes a grant of special privilege as all the findings cannot be made. - 1 - EXHIBIT _._B PAGE..2.OF' 3. That the Variance will not be detrimental to persons or property in the neighborhood or to the public welfare. Authorizing the Variance will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. Although the size of the second unit deviates greatly from the Ordinance, it cannot be found that this deviation would affect neighboring persons or property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby deny PA 90-005 Cantors Variance request to exceed the maximum permitted floor area for second units. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of March, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director • -2- PACE LQ.of RESOLUTION NO. 90 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING PA 90-005 CANTORI SECOND UNIT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND UNIT AT 7859 IRONWOOD DRIVE WHEREAS, Carlo Cantors filed a Conditional Use Permit application to allow the use of a second dwelling unit, at 7859 Ironwood Drive; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance, permits the establishment of second units in R-1 Districts subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit and compliance with minimum development criteria; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said application on March 19, 1990; and WHEREAS, proper notice of said public hearing was given in all respects as required by law; and WHEREAS, the application has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and has been found to be categorically exempt; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Conditional Use Permit request will not have significant environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the Staff Report was submitted recommending that the Conditional Use Permit request be approved; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations and testimony hereinabove set forth; and WHEREAS, the proposed land use, if conditionally approved, is appropriate for the subject property in terms of being compatible to existing land uses in the area and will not overburden public services; and WHEREAS, the proposed land use will not adversely impact area traffic, utility capacity, access and mobility for handicapped or disabled persons, adjacent properties or the neighborhood in general; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby find: FINDINGS OF APPROVAL: a) Approval of the second unit serves to provide development of a small rental housing unit specifically designed to meet the special housing needs of the owners of the subject property. l EXHIBIT C PAGE I1._OF-a' b) Approval of the second unit will allow more efficient use of the City's existing housing stock and the subject residential property. c) The proposed floor plan and elevations submitted by the Applicant for the second dwelling unit will provide for quality residential construction prac- tices and will protect property values and the single-family character of the neighborhood. d) The use, as conditioned by this Resolution, will be properly related to other land uses, transportation, and service facilities in the vicinity, and will not be in conflict with existing surrounding residential uses. e) The use will not materially adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, as all applicable regulations will be met. f) The use will not be contrary to the specific intent clauses or performance standards established for the District in which it is to be located, as the proposed use will be compatible with surrounding residential uses. g) The approval of the Conditional Use Permit will be consistent with the Dublin General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby condi- tionally approve said application as shown by materials labeled Exhibit A on file with the Dublin Planning Department and subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to issuance of building permits and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval. 1. Construction of the second dwelling unit shall be generally consistent with the floor plan and elevations submitted with the application and dated received by the Planning Department January 16, 1990 with the exception that only the upstairs addition (approximately 625 square feet) may be used as a second unit. The kitchen (sink, cook top and plumbing and electrical within the walls) in the downstiars addition shall be removed within 30 days of the approval of this use permit. 2. A deed restriction shall be filed by the Owner establishing that the occupancy requirements for the two residences shall be as outlined by Section 8-22.6.2(8) of the Zoning Ordinance and shall be further limited to require occupancy of one of the two units (when both units are occupied) by a person or persons age 55 or older, or by a handicapped person or persons. The deed restriction shall be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney prior to recordation and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit for the second unit. 3. Failure to establish the use within two years of the effective date of the permit will cause the permit to become null and void. -2- PAGELLCIFe22- 4. This approval shall become null and void, in the event the approved use ceases to operate for a continuous one-year period. 5. This use shall be subject to Zoning Investigator review and determination as to compliance with the conditions of approval on an annual basis. 6. This permit shall be revocable for cause in accordance with Section 8-90.3 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Any violation of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be subject to citation. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of March, 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director -3- PAGE L?L OF ORDINANCE NO. 05 - 84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RELATING TO SECOND UNITS IN R-1 DISTRICTS The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: • Section 1. Definition: Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Alameda County Ordinance Code previously adopted by the City of Dublin is amended by the addition of Section 8-22.6.1 to read:' 8-22.6.1 Second Unit: A second unit shall mean a unit with separate kitchen, sleeping, and bathroom facilities which is a part of, or an extension to, a detached single family unit, and which is subordinate to the principal dwelling unit. Section 2. Location: Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Alameda County Ordinance Code previously adopted by the City of Dublin is amended by the addition of subsection (f) to Section 8-26.3 Conditional Uses: R-1 Districts to read: (f) Second unit as governed by Section 8-60.58.1. Section 3. Purpose and Property Development Standards: Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Alameda County Ordinance Code previously adopted by the City of Dublin is amended by the addition of Section 8-60.58.1 to read: • 8-60.58.1 Purpose of Second Units: The purpose of allowing second units in R-1 Districts is to provide the opportunity for the development of small rental housing units designed to meet the special housing needs of individuals and families, particularly those of low and moderate income. It is the further purpose of this Section to: 1) allow the more efficient use of the City's existing housing stock and underdeveloped residential properties; 2) to provide rental housing units for persons who are elderly or disabled; 3) to protect property values and the single family character of the neighborhood; and, 4) to provide adequate public services and traffic flow, by insuring that second units are installed under such additional conditions as may be appropriate to further the purposes of this ordinance. Prior to making a decision on an application, consideration shall be given to traffic impact, utility capacity, access and mobility for handicapped or disabled persons, impact on adjacent neighbors, and impact on the neighborhood. In addition to those conditions deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission to protect the public health, safety and welfare, second units shall meet the following minimum cirteria: ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 1.O ( . l.% Lot - The subject lot shall contain an existing, detached, single family dwelling unit and have a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. 2. Limitation - No more than one second unit shall be permitted on any one lot. ; 3! Size - The total floor area of the second unit shall be --' not less than 275 square feet, nor more than 1,000 1200 square feet. However, in no case shall the second family residential unit exceed 35% of the total floor area of the existing residential structure. (4.' Location - The second unit shall conform to the _i development standards for the zoning district in which it is located, including but not limited to, standards for front, rear, and side yard setbacks, and height, but excluding density standards. 5. Parking - The second unit shall be provided with .on additional off-street parking space. The parking space may be uncovered and may be in tandem with the required • parking of the principal dwelling unit, if lot configuration or aesthetic considerations preclude placement elsewhere on the parcel. The principal dwelling unit must conform to the parking requirements of Sections 8-63.4 and 8-63.17. 6.' Design - The second unit shall be designed in such a way that the apt r�^^� ^f he new b l�;nc remains that of a sin le family dwelling. Accordingly, any new entrance to the second unit shall not be visible from the street. Coverage - The principal and second unit shall not cover more than 60% of the lot. 8. Occupancy - a) Applications shall be limited to owner occupants who have resided in the principal dwelling for a minimum period of six months. b) No more than one dwelling unit on the parcel shall be rented or leased. c) The owner of the lot may occupy either the principal or second unit. • d) Nothing in this section prohibits one or both dwelling units to remain vacant. • e) The City shall require recordation of a deed restriction setting forth the occupancy requirement. f) No subdivision shall be allowed unless the division meets the applicable regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Setback - If the second unit is detached, it shall be a minimum of ten feet from the principal unit. Section 4. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, '� sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance, or any part �' thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. • PAGE /5 OF -- Section 5. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its final passage and adoption by the City Council. Section 6. Posting of Ordinance: The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three public places in the City of Dublin, in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 27 th day of February , 1984, by the following votes: AYES: Councilmembers Drena, Hegarty, Jeffery, Moffatt and Mayor Snyder NOES: None ABSENT: None Ma r ATTEST: City Cle PAGE L OFF •1 ' - �LIf ION FOR BUILDING AND/OR ELECTRICAL,,aiik.UMBING, MECHANICAL PERMIT City of Dublin-Building Inspection Dept 6500 DUBLIN BLVD.,DUBLIN,CA 9456e THIS APPLICATION,WHEN VALIDATED,IS YOUR PERMIT. Expires " 1 Year: ❑2 Years: " --/`^ INSPECTORS-ORIGINAL PART 1 -APPLICANT TO FILL IN: �Inspectbn Request 829-0822(� Y,� VACIDA1E I. �4551 %I EUOQU m a oJ\1t e'71 • ?4 b' D HERE / BETWEEN CROSS STS ZJ OAO �- AND 1.I��P{'yl"G �`'� ��1i/ WORK l H. APPLICANT: OWNER ^CONTRACTOR DRIVER LIC NO4�_ � _HOMEE e/_ Tr III. OWNER'S NAME:d4 / ) J p /' �/y ADDRESS_SS�C�._i_gj10-F��� . CITY�Ra , PHONE ZIPT', 4.4g- ���f e/..- W. CONTRACTOR'S NAME: _ - PHONE //�7 / -1 ADDRESS / CITY_ ZIP /L/ V. ARCHITECT Y114111 IEUWIIAMjir� �) J� „)iP LFit:,'�^PRONE _ � 3 STATE LIC • -_ __� ADDRESS IO[-ICSF-ty'a _p, v.�'V a__ CITY KA- .. , ZIPv. .-- ._ _ VI. LEGAL DESCRIPTION IFS in one of the Mlowing): A TRACT Ly"/��/ BLOCK r LOT - - - - ' B BOOK--�$J_—BLOCK T(rl f PARCEL Al75/ ELECTRICAL SERVICE 600 van or Less NG FEEIWOC PARCEL MAP _._ _ PARCEL_ L_Over Inc Fee Ea add top Over I Over Fee v Ea.Add KVA 0 100 iI 600 200 KVA NO FEE VII.DESCRIPTION OF,W/O�RK TO BE DONE 81 More than t meter New AaanlOnp_Anmten.__Aeon—_Moved_-_Demohsn _Rennet MOTORS.GENERATORS.HEATERS.FURNACES. C1 ELECT.CIRCUIT AMP.CAP. A DESCRIBE NEW BUILDING Gross Area __ J t rf� Sq Ft WELDERS.TRANSFORMERS,RECTIFIERS,AIR COND'RS OVERINC NO. FEE F SVA OR,W RF v.oa W No Stories_ 1 Edenor Wan Cwenng /(me of _We I NO. FEE ovcR_,Nc NO I FEE 0 20 B DESCRIBE PRESENT BUILDING Gross A'ea /4e`e SO R _0 1 I 15 SO L 21 90 No Stones I ESterior Wail Covering l7i//.Le 2 5O 100 31 40 C DESCRIBE ADDITION /� 2 S I 100 - A( SO Gross Area.__`!iO Sq Fl No Slopes __ ` 5 t5 J SI 70 D 15 BUILDING ADDITION Heated Yes No_ Cooled Yes No FOR MOTOR GENERATOR SETS 71 IN VIII.DESCRIBE ALTERATION OR REPAIR WORK OR ADDITION ADD 50%TO TOTAL to, - • _ ITEM NOj FEE ITEM NO. FEE ITEM NO. FEE �•� 1 Ewe.. w rr More a F:Ze SI Lye Rama. t Elemcr Plune'^e ,y n //�� Avoeze>:irael aeon tN crelrxrr cw Eregirrrp L'W✓ " �] W Pe.N Ea.Mal Own• IX. PROPOSED USE OF UILDING �p r� !` ,,wit e......,1 Dv.Noe'.Syrre Is F.edema Ann Kr Le... 1S cue Moos S.. S Gs Sore Seen donor. ri F.Seen defense.Pn s• Desse X. PRESENT USE OF BUILDING h/ e- e j� ( /eS/(a, , Ir E.wr Fm / ! r 4a Peso SVK•m ,a Fi A.iv..Ur.to a an S1 FvwsmokeSege Ye.e. �+y ^^ lee*1Nn, &tl RI. VALUATION(Include cows of all Labor and Material)""se4( ir{ V F f�V a G+s fArs I Sod Lose Ou e l Dierwp,lmnueee atuden a n•I v tii•Ie I.suss of Can Care r elements I hereby athrm thdl am IKanLsed under.pvlsen5Ab1Chapter 91CTORS Gcommencing with Section 70001 al Duo.sen 13 of the Business and Prolessions Cede.and my license Is in full force and effect. ,LARATION a"d`^ _,, ire Dame.,.1 2 bur Co.. License Class LK Number 11 F. Como ' — naRON A S(Commoros o e Cate__ _— Contractor OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Ia Daiwa Xe Ores Chmrwy Ey,.Pe,uer' I hereby affirm that I am ever.from Ind COMraDE a LICMse Law lei the IollOwnl eeelr W Fee Business and Prolessans Code Any city or county which Howes a 9 reason ISeC'OT e. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY demolish.or repair any structure.poor to I(S Issuance,also r perppd to t for sucl.alter,!morose. signed stateroom that ire s Ieensed pursuant to to •quires the apt actor s for such perms 10 hie a BLDG.ADDRESeC e.uslnes s n the DeesCont .ors License Law Chaplerexempt 9 ,� 7'��, S/ (commencing win Section 11X101 0l()vision 3 of me Business and Professions Cedel a that ire Is exempt RCV'D �i ' /� therefrom and the oasis for the alleged exemption.Any v:.abon of Sermon 7031 5 by any applicant fora D.LS.EXC.PERMIT PERMIT FEE 7 perms suDl«fs the ap.ucanl to a civil penalty or not more than five hundred dollars f550011 angpp!! I.asowns.of(ne property.amy employees wenwagesas herrsole<ompenaaeon.Wll Domeoak. GROUP _ / OVER GO CNEL ENERGY SURCH//�, ina suucure s not intended or offered for sale IS« 7a•.Business and Prolessans Code Tne TYPE 4,4 SPRINKLED PLAN STORAGE(1114 l Contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who x does such worktheim m ishom m hemp!' through or thrgh his own employees.provided oved that such improvernents are not alended or WATER PERMIT PROCESS offered fa sale Iry however. building Or proveent void w one year of coplelan.the n wra owner-budder nave the burden of proving that ire did not build or Improve for the purpose of sale I SEWER SCHOOL ADDL.PROCESS ❑ I.as owner or the property,am excursively Conra.mg won licensed conlracta m 5 to construct e Pownerct(Sect 7044.Business and Protessarls Code TM Contractors License Law does rut anely to an FIRE RECPT• SUB TOTAL ors of whoprogeny bui lds or Improves tnsreon.and ono contracts for such al«n m . Wormed pursuant to the Contractors License Law r pr hi ma[Onlrap131 PA a ❑ I am exempt under Sec .8 OP C for this reason GEOL APT. ' APPROVED _ s.-./j®� 8Date- • J✓ F✓./rl/WAI PRZ2r/.a i USE ZONE ZeNING APPROVAL ���,�, �_ �� WORKER CO - NSA LNd D CURA ION • -L DUG I hereby affirm that I have a cernhcae of consent t0 seff.insure,or a cen:hcale of Workers Compen - - Insarance.or a cenlnedcopy bhe«r bs«3800.Lao c.1 a INSnnPE.LLCT�IONnR.ECORyyD- ,/ de Pdey No. Company 0 €46/ >,Z: /.•O-/Nk- 9 Goodie.copy a hereby furntsMO. Ex.ratde Dats ,_ a &a Tl•�1S ✓/4oT '� ,,J- •-!//Vu 1-7 Carnned copy Is need wrtn city oohing insp«non aepanment /K G /a l• •-J T ��J T1175 iS A- /NC,L£ Aj lILY/g 5/g7t1Cc=ZIE Date Applicant L V. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' J- COMPENSATION INSURANCE j- J (This sector reed ndl be compteted:f the Porto is for one hundred dollars IS1001 Or les - 1. (7-- /y Vi 1�'L� I candy that r the performance of the work for which this permit:s leaned.I snail not employ y persona [l7! 1F C J �)�F/V/aV any manner so as to become snored a the Workers Compensator,laws.Caktorne /j�/am� JL/ c • ' (� ,e Date Appkcant x�•r'INDI /CO�it14'L-iiiUSG,V.r', f'I-.PA NOTICE TO APPLICANT.H.after making!Ns Certificate of Exempten.you should become so• n)( � Q). yr s Workers Coetpeesaled revoked .Ind Lapp Code,You must hMMvM comply with auto provsions or this 1 �+f /'I // 1 4111111:: porno sell he e neaten provmo r �/] c J1 �-,� • r CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY /,11 j L' / I hereby ahem that there is a cOnrnuCten*none) / S'' ! / ' ng agency I.the pMOrmarYe of the work Ip when IMa i' ' v/ _pence is Issued(Sec 3097.Om.C.I. 1�'I_ �f/p�"_r I y l'. Lender's Name _c.J ! l 1�t f-�(- Fit(C. (1 Lender s Aalr.ss C.-?t•n n- E-I.r••MI T Ill -1-C�rEZ O LTt NI <r I certify mat I nave read this appteaten and state mat the above informs on a correct I agree t0 comply win, `�C:t`CLQ T� - V ;' �n cQ`i 1 ,S[w all ly and county ordinances and stem laws latrng bu 11,11s n,and hereby autronae -L-cc - k NT t:-t�� •TLZ r,N p 1 G�HNs cdu/�n to enter L the ed pur��s. Cal*-r'_j"1!/ rJ , i vr.0 . 2r�►c.cF. 1cL rc at /✓�1 ` C� /Jll/ 01. a'°`fay `aiLc�2 icy f tmat__.- 1-ltl� Qrt�t�+�L13 (...et , Swint. Appkcant or Agent 1k'li1 E 0\1 {.�f�•LU rRlt. T(,D TZri.-tcu c_ ttt TL riX1 APPROVALS APPROVALS REM i�J,ry�'$.pE �� I'OR . :ATE ITEM INSPECTOR DATE ITEM INSPECTOR DATE FOUNDATION PIERS // ' ' SHEARROOF DIAP • FINAL ELEC. UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL 666 ROUGH ELEC. /� / „f' ./FINAL PLUMB. UNDERGROUND PLUMBING ROUGH PLUMB. iq ! Ly._ e ld 3'�FINAL HEAT UNDERFLOOR PLUMBING 1,4 �l t ROUGH HEAT /,•r G 7�L GAS TEST UNDERFLOOR HEATING (FRAMING �j:.ya(a, ' 7/"r FINAL UNDERFLOOR FRAMING / `7 ` - EXT.LATH 7 SIy�G ' UNDERFLOOR INSULATION / �T7 V' E FIREPLACE ! I -J INSULATION R��� DRYWALL ic‘ C 4 '�'pd 4elUfwe�V1 2e.r�. ;` - i• 0 • ,, .:; ' - t, ' - .- ^ ice- 1.t4�r`` , illisi 4�' `� 9n • i�$t ���� cam'4 wE-51-- Cantor' V i cv,./ 7859 Ironwood Dr. Dublin,CA 94568 b • , rf it''', -4. . a � "15 •� S dr t cL St.tL l f- 7u t4t3. ..- ; -4F4e Y xg t :. -v_ 5,0 • i OATI./ Canton 4 �, E.7h :[%� �.f- - ._ .>ti� ,`;i riY i._ ��"`�i. 7859 Ironwood Dr. ` � .. -• Vic W Dublin,CA 94568 — • A V VI ..- • . 6412 1:2N ,,, 3 3i F_ '• PAGE 0 Recording Requested by: Carlo Cantori 7859 Ironwood Drive Dublin, CA 94568 COVENANT Covenant between Carlo Cantori, herinafter referred to as "Covenantor" and the CITY OF DUBLIN, hereinafter referred to as "Covenantee". WHEREAS, Covenantor desires to use an addition as a second unit on the hereinafter described property; and WHEREAS, Covenantee approved Conditional Use Permit request (Planning Aplication PA 90-005) allowing the use of an addition to an existing structure as a second unit, subject to certain conditions, on March 19, 1990; THEREFORE, Covenantor agrees as follows: 1. The real property is located in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California described as follows: Lot 57, Block 1, as said Lot and Block are shown on the Map of "Tract 2164, Pleasanton Township", filed October 3, 1960, Map Book 42, Pages 69, 70, and 71, Alameda County Records. EXCEPTING THEREFROM 1/2 of all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances in and under or that may be produced from a depth below 500 feet of the surface of said land without right of entry upon the surface of said land for the purpose of mining, drilling, exploring or extracting such oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances or other use of or rights in or to any portion of the surface of said land to a depth of 500 feet below the surface thereof. Subject to reservation of water rights referred to in document recorded October 3, 1960, Series No. AR/116429, Alameda County Records. APN 941-169-44 More commonly referred to as: 7859 Ironwood Drive, Dublin, CA 94568. 2. The occupancy requirements of the two residences shall be as outlined by Section 8-60.58.1(8) of the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance, as in effect at the date of this Covenant. ATrwwri PAGE Li_OF 22' 3. The occupancy shall be further limited to require occupancy of one of the two units (when both are occupied) by a person or persons age 60 or older, or by a handicapped person or persons. A handicapped person shall be a person who meets the California Vehicle Code definition of a disabled person (Section 22511.5). Excuted this day of , 1990, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that executed it. NOTARY PUBLIC PAGE Q OF RECEIVED i: 1:1911 N/111111111111.1.11.11.1111.11111.°1111.111.111.111.11.11.1.1111.111.1111.1.1111.1.1.111.1. : . "...."-‘ DULIN G P f+-qo-oos i to — 1.-i- 4' 't6)%44 - . c�+)rp�r 1\ 4�y1 3 / ' II OP' oR It,Le.) it ��'" lC)No'hF. 1 • 1,0 --) toi��� ro'z \ ;; rtw- Itkk-( �w �' NG�w1� ,�vN�oov ,�a.: ATTACu E o �' ' PAGE Of - This project v, , ,ginally a two-story roaster L ,m suite with studio and recreation room. Designed to create an artist studio/drawing room with master bedroom and bath. Later,due to parents retirement and early closing of private school in Pleasanton,this project became needed as living quarters for them. We have five spaces for parking vehicles and two loading zones. Benefits to the community of Dublin: -Increased assessment for property tax purposes -Raise value of adjacent properties -Indirectly raises the quality of homes in the area which in turn attracts more building and property improvements."' ED ATTACHMENT 6 a , 6 ,55O ;.Butt'PLANNING f / F PAGES OF "`