Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-18-2000 Adopted CC MinutesA regular meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, January 18, 2000, in the Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m., by Mayor Houston. ROLL CALL PRESENT: ABSENT: Councilmembers McCormick and Zika, Vice Mayor Lockhart and Mayor Houston. Councilmember Howard. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Houston led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. hi i"r 'i ....... J'i i'J'ii''~'' 'ifi', i ' ~ t i' 'q "i'i 't'""%""~"v'"'l INTRODUCTION OF NEW EMPLOYEES 7:09 p.m. 3.1 (700-10) New employees introduced to the City Council included: Dennis Jew, Information Systems Technician; Anna Hudson, Recreation Coordinator (Senior Center); and Dublin Police Services Deputy Karen Johnson and Sergeant Bill Gordillo. t, ~ ,~ -,,- ii 'ii't ......... ?'"'r',i~ ~ ..... "" ': ........... '" ........... APPOINTMENT OF DUBLIN MEMBER AND ALTERNATE TO LAVTA'S WHEELS ACCESSIBLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE (WAAC) 7:13 p.m. 3.2 (110-30) WAAC Committee members advise the LAVTA Board of Directors on matters relating to WHEELS bus system accessibility and Dial-A-Ride services as they pertain to the elderly and persons with disabilities. Each of the three participating cities appoint two members and one alternate to the WAAC Committee. Paul Moffatt currently serves as one of the City's appointments: · ' ' CITY COUNCIL MINUTEs " .... VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 1 On motion of Mayor Houston, seconded by Vice 'Mayor Lockhart, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Howard absent), the Council confirmed the appointment of Steven Bradley Suoja as member and Paul E. Mature as alternate on the WAAC. CHANGE IN APPOINTMENT TO THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION 7:14 p.m. 3.3 (110~$0) Pursuant to the City's agreement for fire and emergency response services, the City of Dublin is entitled to one City representative on the ACFD Advisory Commission. Mayor Houston stated he has served as the City's representative since April of 1998, and is now requesting that Vice Mayor Lockhart serve on this Commission. On motion of Mayor Houston, seconded by Cm. McCormick, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Howard absent), the Council confirmed the change in appointment and directed Staff to notify the appropriate agencies. PRESENTATION OF TRI-VALLEY VISION PROJECT' 7:14 p.m. $.4 (420~50) Economic Development Director Chris Foss advised that after several years of work, the Tri~Valley Business Council released in October, 1999, its vision for the future of the Tri~ Valley. The publication, entitled "The Golden Valley: A 2010 Vision for the Tri~Valley", defines its 2010 vision in seven broad, yet interdependent goals, including: Economic Vitality; Enhancement of Open Space, Agriculture, and Environmental Quality; Vital Centers and Connected Neighborhoods; Housing Choices; Regional Mobility; Educational Opportunity; and Regional Collaboration. Mr. Foss introduced Executive Director Tom O'Malley. Mr. O'Malley thanked the City for its financial support in getting started on this project. They wanted to make this project as inclusionary as possible. A lot of people volunteered to work on this program. They've received good support wherever they've made their presentations. Their goal is 70% open space and 30% developed urban properties at buildout. They will provide annual reports at the end of each year. ' CITY COUNCIL'MINUTES ' " VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 2 Tim Hunt covered the action plans. He stated they will be looking at a ballot measure in November to do something to ratify the 70%/:30% and creating certainty. They don't yet know what will be in the ballot measure, but stated they would covet the City Council's ideas. They will be looking at development rights and creating a way for everybody to win. They will be looking for endorsements from the cities, towns and Boards of Supervisors. They will work with local planning staffs to help people think a little differently to use our land efficiently. They will be looking at key transportation improvements which are critical. Business infrastructure will also be looked at. They have a very active education committee to identify what's out here. They will utilize an internet based catalog. He summarized that this is a snapshot of what they're looking at this year. Cm. Zika asked about the ballot measure and if this will be advisory. He also asked how it will be enforced. Mr. Hunt stated this is something that is on the table for discussion. They think a lot of the uncertainty around here is because a lot of people don't know what the future is. This will put more certainty to it. Mayor Houston stated he applauded the win/Win situation. With regard to the idea of an irrigation district, people should be told exactly what this means, and how we will accomplish this is very important. Mr. O'Malley stated they are working on coming up with a plan and how to finance it. They'll have the answers by ballot time in August. Mayor Houston stated this is an infrastructure issue that we'll have to work out with the state and a lot of jurisdictions. Mr. O'Malley stated they are looking at plans and how to come up with a model for cooperative agreements. Vice Mayor Lockhart asked about transportation issues and stated we would all like to see BART going to Livermore. She asked if they had received any feedback from Livermore on how they plan to be transit friendly and if BART would even consider them. Mr. O'Malley stated they are looking at a transit hub and Livermore is very strongly behind this. The Council thanked Mr. O'Malley and Mr. Hunt for the very good presentation. ir, ..... ~'"'1'~"i~'-"?""'~"i~'''''''''' ~ fl ~ '~ ......... ," "i'~'i ~',''F',' ........ CITY couNcIL MINUTES ...... VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 3 CONSENT CALENDAR 7:30 p.m. Items 4.1 through 4.11 Mr. Ambrose stated Staff wished to withdraw Item 4.2 related to awarding a contract to CMS Communications for installing a telephone system at the Shannon Community Center (4.2 350~20). Vice Mayor Lockhart pulled Item 4.10. On motion of Cm. Zika, seconded by Vice Mayor Lockhart, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Howard absent), the Council took the following actions: Approved (4.1) Minutes of Regular Meeting of December 21, 1999; Adopted (4.3 600-50) RESOLUTION NO. t - 00 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) FOR MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN STATE'RIGHT-0F.WAY INTERCHANGES OF 1-580 AT DoUGHERTY ROAD, HACIENDA DRIVE, AND TASSAJARA ROAD Adopted (4.4 670~80) RESOLUTION NO. 2 - 00 ESTABLISHING SURPLUS PROPERTY AND DIRECTING STAFF TO NOTIFY APPROPRIATE AGENCIES Adopted (4.5 660-40) RESOLUTION NO. 3- 00 SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 12, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 ' ' 'CITY couNcIL MINUTES ..... VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 4 Accepted (4.6 600-35) improvements constructed under Contract 99-10, Sidewalk Safety Repair (Remove and Replace) and Handicap Ramp Construction Program, and authorized release of $6,129.18 retention to Vanguard Construction after 35 days if there are no subcontractor claims, and approved the Budget Change to increase the Community Development Block Grant funding by $696; Authorized (4.7 600-35) Staff to advertise Contract 2000-03, Swim Center Mechanical Building Renovation, for bids; Accepted (4.8 600-35) improvements constructed under Contract 98-16, Dublin Fool Renovation, and authorized release of $9,598.74 retention to South Coast Pool Plastering, Inc., after 35 days if there are no subcontractor claims, and approved Budget Change of $5,515 from Unallocated General Fund Reserve; Adopted (4.9 600-35) RESOLUTION NO. 4- 00 AWARDING CONTRACT 99-15 DUBLIN SWIM CENTER WATERSLIDE INSTALLATION PROJECT TO TRICON CONSTRUCTION ($184,900) and approved the Budget Change to appropriate $95,890 from reserves to Capital Improvement Project No. 95910; Approved (4.11 300-40) the Warrant Register in the amount of $5,883,404.37. Vice Mayor Lockhart pulled Item 4.10 related to the various consultants for the 1)ow~town Specific Plan areas and asked if these contracts will happen simultaneously or in some land of order. Mr. Peabody stated Staff will do the plans and the $ consultants will do particularparts of all $ of the Specific Plans simultaneously. Vice Mayor LooP. hart referenced page $ of the finalized development program (economics) and asked if the public will be included in this process at this time or after R's put together. Mr. Peabody stated the recommendation is that the Mayor and City Council consider appointing a committee for Village Parkway. People along Village Parkway wanted to participate and our hope is that we will have something from soliciting input. CITY C0'UNCIL MiNuTEs VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 5 Vice Mayor Loclchart referenced page 4~ work products~ and asked if the Council will be seeing any of their workproduct or if it w~lljust be incorporated into the final product. Mr. Peabody explained we have not asked them to do bound reports. We will use their reports and conclusions and the idea is then to bring a full package to the City Council. Cm. McCormick stated in lookd'ng at the scope of work she couldn ;t find if we are going to be lookd'ng at a combination of retail/housing at all. Mr. Peabody stated at this point we will be lookd'ng at a variety of things. We may ask how to improve the character of the uses we have there now. l~'~ht now there is no set agenda. Vice Mayor Ixsckhart asked if we will be doing any kd'nd ora visioning session with the Council to get questions and concepts orjust go out with a blank slate and then get feedback. Mr. Peabody stated when there are some ideas on the table~ we may do a workshop. We really need to get something on the table first and then look at the different approaches. On motion of Cm. McCormick, Seconded by Vice Mayor Lockhart, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Howard absent), the Council adopted (4.10 600-$0) RESOLUTION NO. 5- 00 SELECTING CONSULTANTS FOR THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC. (ECONOMIC) Not to exceed $35,140 RRM DESIGN GROUP (URBAN DESIGN) Not to exceed $44,870 OMNI-MEANS ENGINEERS & PLANNERS (TRAFFIC ENGINEERING) Not to exceed $40,232 and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute the contracts (not to exceed $120,242 total). " 'CITY coUNcIL MINUTES ........................... VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 6 PUBLIC HEARING NO PARKING ZONE ON VILLAGE PARKWAY AT NEW I~680 ON~RAMP SOUTH OF DUBLIN BOULEVARD Mayor Houston moved this item forward on the agenda to right after consent calendar. 7:39 p.m. 6.4 (570~20) Mayor Houston opened the public hearing. Public Works Director Lee Thompson presented the Staff Report and advised that the new on~ramp from Village Parkway to 1-680 is expected to open within the next several weeks. It will be necessary to prohibit parking adjacent to the ramp for safety purposes and because striping the new left turn lane for the ramp will require shifting the through lanes over into the area that is currently available for parking. Mr. Thompson advised that the cost of installing red curb will be paid through the interchange project. Mr. Thompson stated notification of this proposed no parking area was distributed to adjacent businesses and Staff received at least one telephone call from a person who works in the area objecting to the No Parking zone. Karla Henderlong stated she has been a tenant in the building located at 6400 Village Parkway since 1989, and she was present on behalf of a number of tenants of the building. They are protesting removing the street parking because a number of them work at night and this is a safety issue. Their parking lot is completely blocked from the street. This area is largely deserted and right next to a freeway onramp. She spoke with a friend who is an Attorney and he was really incredulous that the Council was considering removing the only safe parking for people working in this building. Even though the Council can make this decision, they would not be shielded from liability by making this decision. She stated they would support restricted hours of parking. She suggested that perhaps this could be postponed in order for the Council to consider and understand their concerns. Mayor Houston closed the public hearing. Vice Mayor Lockhart asked about parking in front of the building during non-commute hours. CITY'COUNCIL MINUTES ..... VOLUME 10 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 7 Mr. Thompson stated the problem is they would be parking in a through lane. The alternate would be to only have one lane. Staff thinks there will be enough traffic that a left turn lane will be needed there. Cm. Zika asked if this will be a signalized intersection. Mr. Thompson stated not right away, but perhaps at some point in the future. Cm. McCormick asked if lighting in the parking lot would make a difference. Cm. Zika stated he felt we could possibly do nothing now and wait until traffic backs up and then address the situation. Mayor Houston stated he felt it makes sense that the first portion going south will have the most traffic. He felt we could go without not restricting the parking in front of the building and this would solve the problem for right now. He asked about the width of Village Parkway there. Mr. Thompson responded it is about 40 feet. Mayor Houston stated he felt we would take maybe 2 spaces out to improve the line of sight. He doesn't see any reason to take the rest of this parking right now. Vice Mayor Lockhart stated she felt we could just monitor this and if it proves to be a problem, we could revisit it. Mayor Houston indicated he was in favor of leaving spaces in front of the building and just taking the spaces to keep the line of sight open. Cm. Zika stated he thought we might as well leave the spaces on the east side. We should look at monitoring the parking if it gets to be a problem. Mr. Ambrose stated Staff can rewrite the Resolution and put it on the Consent Calendar for the next meeting. On motion of Cm. McCormick, seconded by Mayor Houston, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Howard absent), the Council directed Staff to bring back at the next Council meeting, an appropriate Resolution modified as discussed. c v¥ CoUscm VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 8 PUBLIC HEARING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 8.84 SIGN REGULATIONS OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO VEHICLE SIGNS AND TEMPORARY PROMOTIONAL SIGNAGE RELATED TO BALLOONS, PENNANTS AND STREAMERS PA 98~058 7:57 p.m. 6.1 (400-30) Mayor Houston opened the public hearing. Community Development Director Eddie Peabody presented the Staff Report and advised that on December 21, 1999, the City Council introduced an Ordinance pertaining to vehicle signs and temporary promotional signage related to balloons, pennants and streamers. Subject to a zoning clearance, this Ordinance would: 1) Balloons ~ allow balloons smaller than 15" in diameter in commercial and industrial zones provided that they not be displayed more than 10' above the ground. 2) Allow balloons and inflatable devices over 15" in diameter for promotional events for up to 21 calendar days per year if they are ground mounted with the bottom of the balloon touching the ground. 3) Prohibit streamers and pennants. 4) Change the temporary promotional sign permit time to 15 days of display time with no new permit for a 30~day period. Mr. Peabody stated the City Council also directed that Staff enforce these provisions of the Sign Ordinance without a complaint. Staff prepared a revised enforcement policy Resolution to incorporate the Council's direction. Mayor Houston asked for a review of the penalties. Mr. Peabody stated a first citation will be $100, then $200, then $500, then there can be other civil or criminal actions. No testimony was entered by any member of the public relative to this issue. Mayor Houston closed the public hearing. Cm. McCormick stated she still objects to the small balloons and she saw nothing that would prohibit clustering. Vice Mayor Lockhart agreed that we obviously don't know what the future holds and we don't know how people will get creative. She stated she is also against the small balloons, but wants the Ordinance to move forward. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUMI~ 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 9 Mayor Houston stated he felt abuses will cause another review. We've come a long way and he stated he is happy toget this issue moved forward. On motion of Cm. Zika, seconded by Vice Mayor Lockhart, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Howard absent), the Council waived the reading and adopted ORDINANCE NO. 1 - O0 AMENDING CHAPTER 8.84 SIGN REGULATIONS OF THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE (ZONING ORDINANCE) and adopted RESOLUTION NO. 6- 00 ESTABLISHING THE ENFORCEMENT POLICY FOR THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BUILDING CODE, HOUSING CODE, AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE ORDINANCE; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 234-99 ~1'i .......... 17'"""1' 'r ' ~1 ii'-~"'~""[' '"i '"i" 5"r'7~ PUBLIC HEARING ~ ESTABLISHMENT OF LOADING ZONE ON AMADOR PLAZA ROAD IN FRONT OF DUBLIN HONDA 8:02 p.m. 6.2 (570-20) Mayor Houston opened the public hearing. Public Works Director Lee Thompson presented the Staff Report and advised that this proposed loading zone would allow transport trucks delivering cars to the dealership to park along the curb rather than in the two-way left turn lane in the middle of Amador Plaza Road. The curb in front of the dealership is currently painted red, but is not an adopted no parking zone. Since this is a safety issue, it is recommended that the proposed Ordinance be adopted on an urgency basis. Cm. Zika asked if this was our suggestion or at his request. Mr. Thompson stated it was our idea. No testimony was entered by any member of the public relative to this issue. CITY cOuNcIL MINUTES .... VOLUME 10 REGULAR MEETING January t8, 2000 PAGE 10 Mayor Houston closed the public hearing. On motion of Vice Mayor Lockhart, seconded by Cm. McCormick, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Howard absent), the Council waived the reading and on an urgency basis, adopted ORDINANCE NO. 2- 00 ESTABLISHING LOADING ZONE ON AMADOR PLAZA ROAD PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENTS TO CITY'S PURCHASE ORDINANCE 8:03 p.m. 6.3 (380-10) Mr. Ambrose advised that Staff wished to withdraw this item and bring it back in the future. . This Ordinance would amend the City's purchasing procedures to update the process used and minimum purchase amounts required for obtaining competitive bids and for contracts to be approved by the City Council. ~ ,' r" '~"' '~ "-~'"'~'~''~ ~l SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR SHAMROCK FORD., AN AUTONATION USA COMPANY PA 99-046 8:04 p.m. 8.1 (410~30) Associate Planner Andy Byde presented the Staff Report and advised that the City has received an application proposing to expand the service and parts storage capacity to the existing AutoNation sales facility and to add a 5~bay quick lube service necessary to accommodate the conversion of the AutoNation used car facility into the Shamrock Ford new car sales facility. AutoNation USA is located adjacent to 1-580, east of the Hacienda Crossings retail/entertainment center and west of Tassajara Creek. Mr. Byde stated City Council approval of the Site Development Review would allow the modifications necessary to complete the relocation of Shamrock Ford's existing business to the existing AutoNation site. The resulting design would result in a well planned CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 11 dealership that would compliment adjacent Hacienda Crossings Commercial Center, located to the west of the property. Mayor Houston referenced the new service bays and asked if these are additional? Mr. Byde stated they have 1 ¢ now so we would be doubling the number. Cm. McCormick asked about the Extended Stay Hotel location. She stated she was concerned that they don't look down on the service bays. An unidentified audience member stated 48 more days and they will be open. They will relocate a portion on March 6th. They will temporarily operate out of 2 facilities. On motion of Cm. McCormick, seconded by Vice Mayor Lockhart, and by unanimous vote, the Council adopted RESOLUTION NO. 7- 00 APPROVING PA 99-046 AUTONATIONISHAMROCK FORD SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT FOR THE PURCHASE OF A MOTORCYCLE FOR TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 8:10 p.m. 8.2 (580-40) Lieutenant John Hardester presented the Staff Report and advised that Dublin Police Services (DPS) is requesting permission to apply for a grant in the amount of approximately $29,000 to be used to purchase a motorcycle for traffic enforcement, as well as related training and equipment. It is anticipated that following the initial cost, the City would be responsible for approximately $5,000 of annual ongoing costs, which include maintenance on the motorcycle, emergency equipment maintenance, transfer fee for the annual trade-in of the motorcycle, and reinstallation costs for the emergency equipment. The request to apply for this grant is being presented prior to budget submission due to the fact that the Office of Traffic Safety has imposed a January 31, 2000 deadline for applications to be submitted. Cm. Zika asked if the Sheriff's Department has any motorcycles now. ' CIT~ COUNCIL MINUTES ' ' ' VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 12 Lt. Hardester stated they do not, but they do plan to have One within the next year. Cm. Zika stated his main concern was the special training. Lt. Hardester advised that their training center offers this. He advised that San Ramon recently purchased a motorcycle and costs were obtained from them. On motion of Vice Mayor Lockhart, seconded by Cm. Zika, and by unanimous vote, the Council authorized Staff to apply for the grant. LETTER OF SUPPORT TO INCLUDE THE BART EXTENSION TO LIVERMORE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY IN THE ALAMEDA COUNTY EXPENDITURE PLAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE REAUTHORIZATION OF MEASURE B 8:17 p.m. 8.3 (1060-30) Public Works Director Lee Thompson presented the Staff Report and advised that the reauthorization of the Measure B 1/2 cent sales tax would propose to raise approximately $1.4 billion over the next 20 years. The extension of BART to Livermore would reduce traffic on I~580, as well as on Dublin streets near the existing Dublin BART Station. Mr. Thompson stated Staff had prepared a letter to the Alameda County Transportation Authority supporting the inclusion of the BART Extension to Livermore Environmental Study in the revised Expenditure Plan. Vice Mayor Lockhart stated she had hesitations because of the $7 million cost. Her concern is do we have any gesture or information from Livermore stating their GP or SP around the BART station will accommodate tenants of BART related to urbanization and higher densities in a transit area. She asked if the Council felt this would be an interesting agenda item for the Tri~Valley Council meeting in February. She would hate to see the people in this area lay out $7 million for an environmental study if this doesn't go anywhere. Mayor Houston stated in talking with some of the Councilmembers in Livermore, everybody sees what a valuable asset this is for the community. He felt they are very much in favor of it. The environmental work needs to be done to see how this can all work out. This is kind of like the chicken and the egg. Unless we get the environmental CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 13 work done, we will never be in a state of readiness at the state and federal level for funding. Vice Mayor Lockhart stated she is not asking to see their plan right now, but would just like some assurances that they are really serious about listening to what BART is saying. Cm. McCormick stated she also would like to hear their philosophy to see if they've changed to accommodate it. Mayor Houston suggested that this be placed as a topic, for discussion by the Tri-Valley Council and in the interim, this could go forward. They want letters of support for this idea. Supervisor Haggerty called him and stated it would be good for the Valley to be united on this. Cm. McCormick asked if they go ahead and support this tonight, what's the point of discussing it at the TVC meeting? Mayor Houston felt reading what Livermore citizens are saying, that they've been paying this tax all these years, and they recognize the economic benefits and want it to happen. This is a good time for this to happen with the reauthorization of Measure B funds. Vice Mayor Lockhart stated there's all kinds of discussion going on and some people in Livermore want to repeal the BART tax. We should just hear what they have to say about it. Mayor Houston stated this is just to try and.get something on the ballot. Cm. Zika stated he felt it's important to get this process started in order to be in line when the money comes available. He is willing to give Livermore a chance on this and give them the benefit of the doubt. Cm. McCormick stated she is sure they want BART, but her concern is are they going to buy the whole package, transit village retail and the whole package that goes with it. We've never heard this. On motion of Cm. Zika, seconded by Vice Mayor Lockhart, and by unanimous vote (Cm. Howard absent), the Council approved the letter of support and authorized the Mayor to sign the letter. VOLUME 19 REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 14 f Mr. Ambrose stated Staff would request that this topic be added to the TVC agenda; i.e. Criteria by BART to expand. Could Livermore respond to BART's latest criteria for BART Station and how it affects their planning. OTHER BUSINESS 8:28 p.m. Smoking Pollution Control Measure (660~40) Cm. McCormick stated she would like the City Council to receive information on Proposition 28 which would repeal Proposition 10 related to the surcharge on cigarettes. Other councils and school boards are coming out in opposition to this measure and she would like to see it agendized for discussion. ADJOURNMENT 11.1 There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 8:29 p.m. ATFEST: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES VOLUME lO REGULAR MEETING January 18, 2000 PAGE 15