Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 8.9 PA 91-001 Planned Dev rezon to amend cond #54 of CC reso no 32-89TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: CITY OF DUBLIN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT/STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: August 5, 1991 Planning Commission Planning Staff Dennis Carrington, Senior Planner Robert Schubert, Contract Planner SUBJECT: PA 91-001 JL Construction; Dublin Meadows GENERAL INFORMATION: PROJECT: Planned Development Rezoning to amend Condition #54 of City Council Resolution No. 32-89 to allow the option of paying an in -lieu fee rather than providing rental units. APPLICANT/OWNER: JL Construction Company Attn: Ray Young 5966 La Place Court Carlsbad, CA 92008 LOCATION: South of Amador Valley Boulevard South and East of Stagecoach Drive ASSESSOR PARCEL: PARCEL SIZE: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: 941-2765-82 through 296 17.45± acres Medium density residential (6.1 to 14.0 units per acre) and Open Space; Stream Corridor PD (Planned Development) Zoning Unit 1497 for a total of 309 units on this vacant property and the already developed Phase 1 property North: South: East: West: PD, Single -Family and Medium Density PD, Residential PD, Residential & Commercial Southern Pacific right-of-way ITEM NO. 8,l COPIES TO: Agenda/General File Planning/Address File Applicant/Owner PAGE Project Planner OF ZONING HISTORY: Heritage Commons was approved as a Planned Development by Alameda County in November, 1981. At that time, 309 attached residential units were approved. To date, Phase One, originally approved for 79 units was developed with 73 units. The 73 units were developed after a Conditional Use Permit was processed and approved by the Dublin Planning Commission in October, 1983. The 1983 Conditional Use Permit included: changes in the bedroom mix (one -bedroom units were added and the number of 2 and 3 bedroom units was decreased); stacked flats were eliminated in favor of all townhouse units; and the garages and driveways were redesigned to permit parking in the driveway. In 1989 the City Council approved a rezoning of the 17.45 acre undeveloped portion of the site to a Planned Development (PD) District for a residential development of 206 multiple family units (PA 88-009.1). APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 8.12 (Draft Rental Availability Ordinance) contains rental availability requirements for new multi -family residential developments of more than ten (10) units. The draft Ordinance requires that 10% of the total dwelling units within the development be rental units for a period of five (5) years. The obligation to provide rental units may be satisfied by the Applicant's payment of in -lieu rental fees. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact was prepared for General Plan Amendment 91-001 which includes PA 91-001. NOTIFICATION: Public Notice of the July 1, 1991 hearing was published in the local newspaper, mailed to adjacent property owners, and posted in the County Clerk's office and other public buildings. ANALYSIS: This item was continued from the July 1, 1991 Planning Commission hearing to allow revisions to the Planned Development Rezone. The Applicant, JL Construction Company, requests approval to amend Condition #54 of City Council Resolution No. 32-89 (Resolution Approving a PD Rezoning for Heritage Commons, PA 88- 009). Condition #54 currently reads as follows: The developer shall provide guarantees that a minimum of 10% of the multi -family units in the project shall be maintained /hsng-c -2- PAGE Z OF ( ° as rental units for a period of five years. The document providing said agreement shall be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. Developer agrees that until the Condition has been satisfied, there shall be no conversion of condominium units for sale. The Applicant requests that Condition #54 be amended to allow the option of paying an in -lieu fee rather than providing rental units. Condition #54 would be revised to read as follows: "The Developer shall provide guarantees in the form of a deed restriction that a minimum of 10% of the multi- family units in the project shall be maintained as rental units for a period of five years or that an in - lieu rental fee of $10,808 per rental unit be paid in accordance with the Rental Availability Ordinance. that would -be -computed -as -follows : --The-required-number-ef rental -units -shall -be -multiplied -tunes -the -amount neeessarp-to-subsidise-the-rental-of-a-three-bedroom market -rate -apartment -for -five -years -for -a -family -of five-earning-80%-of-the-Alameda-County-median-ineeme; where-no-mere-than-30%-of-ineeme-is-to-be-spent-on rent.---The-amount-ef-the-in-lieu-rental-fee-is determined -rising -the -following -table Family-of-Rive7--Alameda-County-Median-ineeme-of-$467850 Pereent---Market---Affordable---Di€ferenee---12-Mos---5-prs--The-value-ef --ef Rent Rent the -first Median year's -rent Income plus-4-years at-4%-pearly adjustment -for rent -increases 80% $1,100 $937 $163 $17956---$9,780 $10-594 Twenty-one units shall be maintained as rental units. Developer shall record the Deed Restriction requiring that the twenty-one rental units, which shall be enumerated in said deed restriction, be maintained as rental units for a period of five years. The five year period shall commence with the granting of final occupancy of each rental unit. The Deed Restriction shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director and City Attorney, and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of any project building permit. If elected by the developer, the in -lieu rental fee for twenty-one units is $2227474-f21-x-$10 594700t $226,968.00 (21 x $10,808.00). An amount equal to 1/206th of the total in -lieu rental fee of $2227474:00 /hsng-c PAGE 3 OF a -3- $226,969.00 shall be paid for each unit or $17879:97 $1,101.79. The in -lieu rental fee would be reduced proportionately if at least 10% of the units are rented during the five year period after final occupancy of each rental unit. The in -lieu rental fees shall be paid as follows: 1. No later than 30 days from the date of adoption of the Planned Development Rezoning Ordinance for those units which have already received final inspections, and 2. Prior to final inspection for those units which have not received final inspection." RECOMMENDATIONS: FORMAT: 1) Open public hearing and hear Staff presentation. 2) Take testimony from Applicant and the public. 3) Question Staff, Applicant and the public. 4) Close public hearing and deliberate. 5) Take action regarding the Planned Development Rezoning or give Staff and Applicant direction and continue the matter. ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Planned Development Rezoning to amend Condition #54 of City Council Resolution No. 32-89 to allow the option of paying an in -lieu rental fee rather than providing rental units. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Resolution recommending City Council approve the rezoning to amend Condition #54 of City Council Resolution No. 32-89 to allow the option of paying an in -lieu fee rather than providing rental units. Exhibit B: Page 14 of City Council Resolution No. 32-89. Exhibit C: Draft City Council Ordinance /hsng-c -4- PAGE ,� OF 1v RESOLUTION NO. 91 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING PA 91- 001 TO AMEND CONDITION #54 OF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 32-89 (PA 88-009) TO ALLOW THE OPTION OF PAYING AN IN -LIEU RENTAL FEE RATHER THAN PROVIDING RENTAL UNITS FOR HERITAGE COMMONS - J.L. CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, JL Construction Company has requested approval of a Planned Development Rezoning to amend Condition #54 of City Council Resolution No. 32-89 to allow the option of paying an in -lieu rental fee rather than providing rental units; and WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the local newspaper and posted in the City Clerk's Office and in other public buildings in accordance with California State Law; and WHEREAS, the requested amendment to Condition #54 has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report, SCH #84011002, was prepared for the Dublin General Plan and certified on February 11, 1985; which Environmental Impact Report addressed impacts of the future development of the City of Dublin; and which impact of said development of the General Plan exceed the impacts of General Plan Amendment 91-001, including Planned Development Rezoning PA 91-001; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 1991, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. recommending City Council certification of the Negative Declaration as adequate and complete; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all written and oral testimony submitted at the public hearing. WHEREAS, data indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the housing for which the in -lieu rental fee is levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the housing, including General Fund revenues were made available to the public at least 10 days prior to the public hearing; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Dublin Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the requested amendment to Condition #54, of City Council Resolution No. 32-89 (PA 88-009) as shown on Attachment 1 attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT amending Condition #54 of Resolution No. 32-89 adopted by the City Council on March 27, 1989, does not cause the remainder of that resolution to be superseded. /hsngrec EXHIBIT A PAGE OF 180 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of August, 1991. AYES: /' NOES: A) ABSENT: Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Director /hsngrec PAGE a OF I° 2 ATTACHMENT 1 54. The developer shall provide guarantees in the form of a deed restriction that a minimum of 10% of the multi -family units in the project shall be maintained as rental units for a period of five years or that an in -lieu rental fee of $10,808 per rental unit be paid in accordance with the draft Rental Availability Ordinance. -that -would-be eamputed-as-fellows:--The-required-number-ef-rental-units-shall-be multiplied-times-the-amount-neeessary-te-subsidize-the-rental-ef-a three-bedroom-market-rate-apartment-for-five-years-for-a-family-ef five-earning-80%-ef-the-Alameda-Ceunty-median-ineeme-,-where-ne-more than-38%-ef-ineeme-is-to-be-spent-en-rent---The-amount-ef-the-in-lieu rental -fee -is -determined -using -the -following -table: Family-ef-Five:--Alameda-Ceunty-Median-ineeme-ef-$4678587 Pereent---Market---Affordable---Differenee---12-Mes---5-yrs--The-value-ef --of Rent Rent the -first -Median years -rent ineeme plus-4-years at-4%-pearly adjustment -for rent-fnereases 80% $1,100 $937 $163 $17956----$97780----$10 594 Twenty-one units shall be maintained as rental units. Developer shall record the Deed Restriction requiring that the twenty-one rental units, which shall be enumerated in said deed restriction, be maintained as rental units for a period of five years. The five year period shall commence with the granting of final occupancy of each rental unit. The Deed Restriction shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director and City Attorney and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of any project building permit. If elected by the developer, the in -lieu rental fee for twenty-one units is $2227474700-f21-x-$10 594-68) $226,968 (21 x $10,808.00). An amount equal to 1/206th of the total in -lieu rental fee of $2227474700 $226,968.00 shall be paid for each unit or $17079797 $1,101.79. The in-lieu-rental-fee-would-be-redueed-prepertienateiy-if-at-least-l8%-of the-units-are-rented-during-the-five-year-period-after-oeeupaney-ef eaeh-rental-unit- The in -lieu rental fees shall be paid as follows: 1. No later than 30 days from the date of adoption of the Planned Development Rezoning Ordinance for those units which have already received final inspections, and 2. Prior to final inspection for those units which have not received final inspection. /hsngrec 3 PAGE OF ComDtzt o,� 54 52. Should the units be initially occupied as apartme _ units, the following reports shall be filed with, and approved by, the City Engineer at the time the units are put up for individual sale. A. A report by a licensed roofing contractor certifying that the roofs of all the structures are in good condition and not likely to be in need of replacement for at least 10 years. A reserve deposit may be established to cover the estimated prorated costs of roof replacement where replacement will be required prior to 10 years. B. A report by a professional Engineer attesting, to the extent reasonably feasible, that the structure of all buildings, pavements, storm draininage facilities, and the interior and exterior plumbing, electrical systems, and utility and mechanical equipment to be owned in common, or as part of the individual condominiums, are in good and serviceable condition. C. A report by a licensed painting contractor that paint throughout the project is in good condition and that the building exteriors should not require repainting for at least five years. A reserve deposit may be established to cover the estimated prorated costs for the repainting of the units where repainting will be required prior to a 5-year period. D. A report by a licensed termite and pest control specialist certifying that the structures are free of infestation and structural damage caused by pests. 53. Should the units be initially occupied as apartment units, all appliances shall either be replaced with new units or the initial buyers provided with a one -year's parts and warranty guarantee on all appliances at the time the units are put up for individual sale. 54. The developer shall provide guarantees that a minimum of 10% of the multi -family units in the project shall be maintained as rental units for a period of five years. The document providing said agreement shall be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. Developer agrees that until the Condition has been satisfied, there shall be no conversion of condominium units for sale. 55. The minimum distances between buildings, building appurtenances and other project improvements shall comply with the chart in Attachment The term "building" shall refer to the exterior side of building walls containing heated space. Exceptions to the standard setbacks are possible thrDugh review and approval by the Planning Director through the Site Development Review process. (PASS-009.1:Reso CC (FD) 3/27/S9) -14- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING PA 91-001 TO AMEND CONDITION #54 OF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 32-89 (PA 88-009) TO ALLOW OPTION OF PAYING AN IN -LIEN RENTAL FEE RATHER THAN PROVIDING RENTAL UNITS FOR HERITAGE COMMONS - J.L. CONSTRUCTION The City Council of the City of Dublin does ordain as follows: "Section 1: Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Dublin Municipal Code, specifically Condition of Approval No. 54 of City Council Resolution No. 32-89 (PA 88-009, the Planned Development approving Heritage Commons) is hereby amended as follows: 54. The developer shall provide guarantees in the form of a deed restriction that a minimum of 10% of the multi -family units in the project shall be maintained as rental units for a period of five years or that an in -lieu rental fee of $10,808 per rental unit be paid in accordance with the draft Rental Availability Ordinance. -that -would-be eomputed-as-follows:--The-required-number-of-rental-units-shall-lie multiplied-times-the-amount-neeessary-te-subsidize-the-rental-ef-a three-bedroom-market-rate-apartment-for-five-years-for-a-family-ef five-earrifng-80%-of-the-Alameda-County-median-ineome;-where-no-mere than-30%-of-ineome-is-to-lie-spent-on-refit---The-amount-ef-the-in-lien rental -fee -is -determined -rising -the -following -table: Family-ef-Five7--Alameda-COUnty-Median-Ineeme-ef-$4678587 Pereent---Market---Affordable---Differenee---12-Mes7--5-yrs--The-value-ef --ef Rent Rent the -first -Median year'-s-rent income plus-4-years at-4%-yearly adjustment -far rent-inereases 80% $1,100 $937 $163 $17956----$9 780----$10 594 Twenty-one units shall be maintained as rental units. Developer shall record the Deed Restriction requiring that the twenty-one rental units, which shall be enumerated in said deed restriction, be maintained as rental units for a period of five years. The five year period shall commence with the granting of final occupancy of each rental unit. The Deed Restriction shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director and EXHIBIT c PAGE q OF ► 0 /hsngordc 1 City Attorney, and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of any project building permit. If elected by the developer, the in -lieu rental fee for twenty- one units is $2227474700-f21-x-$107594700) $226,968.00 (21 x $10,808.00). An amount equal to 1/206th of the total in -lieu rental fee of $2227474700 $226,968.00 shall be paid for each unit or $17079797 $1,101.79. The -in -lieu -rental -fee -would -be -reduced proportionately-if-at—least-10%-of-the-Units-are-rented-dUring the-five-year-perled-a€ter-€lnal-eeeupaney-a€-eaeh-Uf1t7 The in -lieu rental fees shall be paid as follows: 1. No later than 30 days from the date of adoption of the Planned Development Rezoning Ordinance for those units which have already received final inspections, and 2. Prior to final inspection for those units which have not received final inspection." Section 2: This ordinance shall take effect and be in force upon payment by the J.L. Construction Company, or its successor in interest, of the in -lieu rental fees as provided in Section 1 above, but in no event shall this ordinance take effect and be in force earlier than 30 days from and after the date of its passage. Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, it shall be published once, with the names of the council members voting for and against the same, in a local newspaper published in Alameda County and available in the City of Dublin. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this day of , 1991, by the following votes: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk MAYOR /hsngordc 2 PAGE Io OF I a