HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.1 Approve 06-25-1990 & 06-26-1990 Minutes REGULAR MEETING - June 25, 1990
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin was held
on Monday, June 25, 1990, in the Council Chambers of the Dublin Civic
Center. The meeting was called to order at 7: 37 p.m. , by Mayor
Moffatt.
* * * *
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Hegarty, Jeffery, Snyder, Vonheeder and Mayor
Moffatt.
ABSENT: None.
* * * *
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in the pledge of
allegiance to the flag.
* * * *
PROCLAMATION
Mayor Moffatt read a proclamation declaring the month of July as
"Parks and Recreation Month" and urged citizens of Dublin to use and
enjoy the City's parks, taking into consideration their beneficial
effect to the well being of all.
* * * *
ALAMEDA COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
City Manager Ambrose introduced Bruce Kern, who made a slide
presentation and gave a report related to the development of an
Alameda County Economic Development Program. The slide presentation
looked at local government's ability to respond to changes. Mr. Kern
highlighted 2 recent events. The passage of Measure A on the June
ballot would have potentially resulted in the close down of the
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. The second issue related to the
important issue of growth management. AB 4242 would remove from local
control, the ability to monitor land use opportunities.
Mr. Kern advised that effective in September his job responsibilities
will be devoted entirely to the economic health of the community. All
of his other relationships with the County will be severed so that he
can work on economic development issues.
Mr. Ambrose advised that he sat on the subcommittee that presented the
report to the Alameda County Mayors' Conference. Mr. Ambrose
presented some background information and advised that in 1989, the
Alameda County Board of Supervisors formed the Alameda County Ad Hoc
Economic Development Committee with its primary focus to study and
make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors regarding how the
County could improve economic development within the County. The
Committee's report was approved in principal by the Board of
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 161
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
COPIES TO:
E' ■
ITEM NO. „ji (!
n.
Supervisors in February, 1990. The plan was then referred to the
Alameda County City Managers' Association and the Alameda County
Mayors' Conference for review and comment. The City Managers had
concerns related to the imbalance of the structure proposed for the
Economic Development Advisory Board and the fact that the County had
major assets to develop, yet the County would be responsible for
coordinating the marketing of various properties on a Countywide
basis.
In April, 1990, the City Managers' Association prepared a report to
the Board of Supervisors requesting that no action be taken on the
plan at this time. Several other recommendations were incorporated
into the final plan which was submitted to the Board of Supervisors in
May, 1990.
Mr. Ambrose stated that Staff believes that the plan provides a number
of opportunities to improve the County's and the Cities' competitive-
ness over the long term in the area of economic development. The plan
proposes a long term objective of convening an Ad Hoc Growth
Management Task Force, but as presently worded,. this Task Force role
is fairly vague and undefined. The cost of the program would require
the City's Planning Department and City Manager's Office to
participate and an annual contribution for the next 4 years. The.
1990-91 maximum contribution is proposed to be $11,471. The City
Managers' Association is reconsidering the cost sharing formula for
the Cities' participation in the program and it is possible that a
revised formula would be developed that may reduce the City's cost to
participate.
Mr. Ambrose advised that Staff also still has some questions regarding
the long term objectives. Staff has not yet seen an agreement. The
County is initially asking for a 4-year commitment.
Cm. Jeffery asked if this would preclude Dublin as a City from doing
its own economic development plan.
Mr. Ambrose stated that it would not.
Cm. Jeffery mentioned that under the section listing utilities, not
all of the utilities are named.
Mr. Kern indicated they were aware of this. All of the utility
companies will even though they are not listed. They did
not intend to leave anyone out.
Cm. Jeffery questioned how the marketing would work.
Mr. Kern advised that they are working on a number of ideas. They
have a marketing committee being formed. Each city will be able to
use the general information. . PG&E and the telephone company will be
paying for the marketing.
Cm. Hegarty felt this appeared to be a step toward -regional planning.
He expressed concern that the largest land owner in Dublin is actually
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 162
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
Alameda County. Dublin has done battle with the County over certain
land issues and he felt Dublin should proceed very cautiously with
this. He stated the outcome of certain legal matters will have an
impact on how he feels about this proposal. Cooperation is needed,
but at the same time, this City Council must look after the best
interest of the City of Dublin. Cm. Hegarty felt the Port of Oakland
has a great deal to do with the economic vitality of this county and
they have a very serious problem.
Mayor Moffatt stated with regard to the first year objectives, he
hoped this will be a mechanism to allow disagreement.
Mr. Kern felt there is a lot of dialogue that needs to happen.
By a. consensus, the Council agreed to the concept of the economic
development plan and authorized Staff to work with Alameda County
toward the development of an agreement.
* * * *
Sound System in Council Chambers.
Mr. Scuitemaker advised that he felt the sound system in the Council
Chambers was not adequate. Several times, he had been unable to hear
comments made by the Council or Staff.
* * * *
CONSENT CALENDAR
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council took the following actions:
Approved Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 11, 1990;
Appropriated 1989-90 unappropriated revenue to each fund's reserves
for authorized projects;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 75 - 90
DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE
OF PROVIDING FINANCING FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS
& AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 32-90
Accepted a gift of $200 from the Women's Club of Dublin designated for
use at the Senior Center and directed Staff to prepare a formal
acknowledgment to the donor;
Adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 76 - 90
AUTHORIZING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO SIGN APPLICATION
FOR STATE-LOCAL PARTNERSHIP FUNDS (SB 300)
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 163
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
Approved Warrant Register in the amount of $727, 695.99;
With regard to 1989-90 budget adjustments, 1) authorized a transfer of
$109,409 from the General Fund contingent Reserve account to satisfy
the budget increases needed in Police, Finance and part of the City
Attorney's budget; 2) appropriated $55,461 from the General Fund
balance to satisfy the remaining amount needed in the City Attorney's
budget; 3) appropriated $1, 087 from the San Ramon Road Assessment
District fund balance for the operating costs incurred that will.
exceed the amount budgeted; and 4) appropriated $8, 643 from the
Internal Service Fund for depreciation charges and maintenance costs
incurred.
Cm. Hegarty felt it should be pointed out to the public that the above
item related to appropriation of additional funds for the City
Attorney's budget was due to the increased frequency of litigation and
the need on the part of the City for legal representation to protect
Dublin's interests. This was not due to any increase in their billing
rates.
Cm. Snyder asked how the price for Police vehicles relates to the
state's bid for CHP vehicles. He questioned if the bids were opened
before or after the state bid was awarded to Ford.
Mr. Molina stated he did not know what the actual bid price was on the
state vehicles, and could not answer Cm. Snyder's questions.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the cars are purchased with money from the
Internal Service Fund. The older cars are breaking down. The bid
price should be good for the next 30 days, so Staff could research
this and answer the questions at the next Council meeting.
The Council agreed to have the item related to purchasing 3 fuel
injected Ford Crown Victorias (including 3 year maintenance) from
Shamrock Ford of Dublin at a total cost of $45, 853 . 02 continued to the
next meeting.
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARING-DONLAN CANYON PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PA 89-125
PREZONING, TENTATIVE MAP & ANNEXATION REQUEST FOR 196+ ACRES
Mayor Moffatt opened the public hearing.
Senior Planner O'Halloran advised that this PD Prezoning, Tentative
Map and Annexation request is for 17 custom single-family lots on 10±
acres, 300 condominium/apartments on 16± acres and 170+ acres of open
space/parkland.
Michael Gleason stated his family had owned the property since the mid
1960's. He gave an overview of the project. A Zone 3 water tank
would serve their project as well as the Hansen Hills Ranch project
and other homes in west Dublin.
@*@*@*@'*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 1.6 4
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
George Thomas with the Paragon Group indicated that everyone had
worked very hard on this project for several years. They are
developing the multi-family units.
Ms. O'Halloran advised that with regard to the Environmental Review,
the Initial Study incorporates by reference the earlier EIR certified
by the City Council on August 14, 1989, and mitigation monitoring
program prepared for the General Plan Amendment and found that there
would not be any significant effects on the environment.
Mr. Gleason stated that the traffic mitigations were outlined in a
Memo from TJKM dated September 27, 1989, which indicates their share
of the mitigation costs. Similar mitigation measures were adopted by
Hansen Hills Ranch project. They worked with the Department of Fish &
Game and also plan a 3 for 1 replacement of trees.
Cm. Hegarty stated he knew. they had worked very hard to do everything
possible, but his biggest concern is that they are trying to fit the
project to the road. What level of traffic will there be on Dublin
Boulevard when the project is completed, as well as when Hansen Hill
Ranch is completed? With regard to the landscaping plan, Cm. Hegarty
expressed concern related to trees that have been lost in the City.
We must take someone's word that excavating around certain trees will
not harm them. The City should make sure they take every care
possible to preserve the trees. The large oak tree which was lost
last year on San Ramon Road was very unfortunate for the whole City.
Mr. Gleason advised that their development is planned in an, area where
there are no large oak trees. With regard to traffic, he pointed out
that it is the City's consultant that did the plan. The City requires
that it must meet certain levels of acceptance. Dublin Boulevard will
be widened to meet the necessary standards. It allows for substantial
development to occur on west by Eden Development.
Mr. Thompson advised that the EIR report discusses improvements to be
made to the intersection of Dublin Boulevard @ Silvergate Drive.
Dublin Boulevard will be widened by filling in the slope on the Hexcel
side.
Mr. Gleason pointed out that Condition #58 on Page 9 addressed the
roadway widening.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing on this portion of the
discussion.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Snyder, and by unanimous
vote,. the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 77 - 90
ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE
FOR PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*.
CM - VOL 9 - 165
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
Ms. O'Halloran advised that the proposed PD District regulations are
similar to the R-1 District and to existing multi-family PD Districts
in the City. The Prezoning is appropriate for the site in that the
proposed provisions are consistent with the City's General Plan land
use designations and policies.
Cm. Snyder questioned if recycling containers would be given to all
units.
Ms. O'Halloran advised that the actual locations will be determined at
the Site Development Review level.
Mr. Thomas gave a brief description of the multi-family portion of the
project and advised that they have adopted the practice of recycling
container locations at all their other projects. The location would .
most likely be where they can drive by on their way out of the
project. In addition, they have discussed picking up residents
recyclables as an amenity to the residents. There are 300 units and
it is a difficult site plan to get everything to work. They want
everything to be convenient, thus there are . 2 recreation areas. They
recognize that the trees are a major marketing tool for them so they
will be extra precautions to preserve them. The style is
somewhat of a Cape Cod New England style.
Mayor Moffatt asked if there are facilities for the handicapped.
Mr. Thomas advised that there are state guidelines, plus local
ordinances that they must follow.
Cm. Hegarty questioned if the spa would be outdoors.
Mr. Thomas responded that it would be outdoors and this is a major
amenity which is almost a necessity.
Cm. Hegarty felt this should be closely monitored because of a prior
PD incident where the City's Planning Director took a lot of flack
when someone wanted to remove one.
Ms. O'Halloran advised that the PD does not specifically require a spa
at this stage.
Mr. Gleason advised that they had done a computerized visual analysis
of the site as viewed from I-580.
Noel Kennedy and Zack Ryman showed visual computer images. Mr.
Kennedy stated that his company does general consulting using
computers to do thorough computer analyses related to visual impacts.
Cm. Hegarty questioned why Dublin doesn't require the water tanks to
be buried instead of putting them on the hillside.
Mr. Tong advised that he had met with DSRSD and they have indicated
that they will be much more sensitive in •the future regarding
screening of these tanks.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 166
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
Mary Beth Acuff, a Via Zapata resident questioned what guarantees
there were that the open space would remain open space.
Ms. O'Halloran advised that the General Plan has the area designated
as open space. There are also requirements that open space area be
provided for in deed restrictions. In order for this to change, it
would require a General Plan amendment with public hearings before the
Planning Commission as well as the City Council
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing on this portion of the
discussion.
On motion of Cm. Snyder, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 78 - 90
APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING FINDINGS AND
GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PREZONING
CONCERNING PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON
and waived the reading and INTRODUCED an Ordinance amending the Zoning
Ordinance to permit the prezoning of real property located north of
the western terminus of Dublin Boulevard.
Ms. O'Halloran advised that the required parkland dedication is 2 . 887
acres or in-lieu fees or a combination may be provided instead.
Dedication of the 170+ acres of open space would not qualify for
parkland dedication. The area is not considered an active recreation
area and is not designated as parkland on the General Plan or the
Master Plan of Parks. The proposed subdivision is appropriate for the
site in that the proposal is consistent with the General Plan.
Marjorie LaBar, representing the Preserve Area Ridgelands Committee,.
asked that the City take a close look at integrating the open space
from this project with any dedication from the Hansen Hill Ranch
project in order to ensure the highest quality of open space in the
City. There is an opportunity here to appropriately place the access
for the entire region. The open space pieces should be integrated
into a whole.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing for this portion of the
discussion.
On motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm: Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 79 - 90
APPROVING TENTATIVE MAP 5962
CONCERNING PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON
Ms. O'Halloran advised that because the project site is located
outside the City limits, LAFCO must approve the annexation. The site
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 167
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
is contiguous to existing City limits and the City could provide the
necessary level of urban services to the site. The site also requires
annexation to the Dublin San Ramon Services District.
Cm. Hegarty stated that several years ago when an annexation line was
drawn, he asked Staff to take a look at the slopes adjacent to Rampart
Drive. At that time, they said the road was not in the City,, but
rather was a CalTrans road. He questioned if this had been
straightened out.
Ms. O'Halloran stated that CalTrans gave this to the County and it has
been resolved.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the roadway annexation will be considered at
the July LAFCO meeting.
With regard to services addressed in the annexation, Cm. Jeffery
questioned the lack of reference to school district services.
Ms. O'Halloran advised that the issue of schools was addressed in the
EIR. The area is currently in the Dublin School District.
Carolyn Mills, representing DSRSD advised that annexation will be
required to the Dublin San Ramon Services District. They are
supporting a joint annexation, just as they supported for the Hansen
Hill Ranch project.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing on this portion of the
discussion.
On motion of Cm. Snyder, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 80 - 90
ANNEXATION APPLICATION (PA 89-125 DONLAN CANYON REORGANIZATION)
ANNEXATION NO. 9
and
RESOLUTION NO. 81 - 90
RELATING TO EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FOR PA 89-125
DONLAN CANYON REORGANIZATION ANNEXATION NO. 9
* * * *
RECESS.
Mayor Moffatt called for a short recess. All Councilmembers were
present when the meeting was reconvened.
* *. * *
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 168
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
PUBLIC HEARING - LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1986-1 (TRACT 5511)
Mayor Moffatt opened the public hearing.
Public Works Director Thompson advised that this assessment district
maintains certain landscaping improvements within Tract 5511, the
Villages @ Willow Creek development. The County Assessor collects the
money for the City for the maintenance of landscaping and irrigation
systems, right-of-way fencing, and walls and entrance signs. The open
space parcel maintenance was charged to the District for 3 years only.
This year's assessment is proposed to be $120 per single-family lot
and $60 per multi-family unit, which is the same as last year's
assessment.
No comments were made by the public on this issue.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 82 - 90
APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,
AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1986-1
PUBLIC HEARING
ORDINANCE RELATING TO NEWSRACKS
Mayor Moffatt opened the public hearing.
Public Works Director Thompson presented the Staff Report and advised
that on May 14, and June 11, 1990, the Council held public hearings
regarding a proposed Ordinance which would require news agencies and
other publications that use on-street newsracks to obtain a no-charge
permit from the City. The Ordinance contained guidelines for place-
ment of racks, an insurance requirement, a maintenance obligation, and
a procedure for impounding racks that were determined to be hazardous.
Mr. Thompson advised that as a result of public comments modifications
were made to the draft Ordinance. The "permit" form was changed to a
"registration" form, and the news agency or publication is allowed up
to 24 hours following placement to register a rack. The requirement,
for modular racks in the Central Business District was changed to
apply to locations with 4 or more racks only. In cases where multiple
racks are involved, the likelihood is greater of the racks straying
into the street or blocking the sidewalk. The language provided by
counsel for one of the news agencies regarding indemnification has
also been incorporated into the draft Ordinance. In addition, the
specific amount of $1, 000, 000 in liability coverage has been added.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 169
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
No comments were made by the public on this issue.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 9 - 90
RELATING TO NEWSRACKS
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARING
BUSINESS REGISTRATION ORDINANCE
Mayor Moffatt opened the public hearing.
City Manager Ambrose advised that on June 11, 1990, the Council
introduced the Business Registration Ordinance which would: 1) assist
the Police and Fire Departments in 'contacting property owners and/or
business owners in the event of an emergency; 2) facilitate the
identification and location of hazardous materials in order to
determine compliance with Building, Fire and State Laws and to
facilitate better disaster planning and response time; 3) provide
information which would facilitate better traffic planning and
improvement; 4) assist businesses in complying with planning, zoning,
building and other City regulations before a substantial investment is
made; and 5) facilitate a more accurate collection of sales tax.
Mr. Ambrose explained that the Ordinance is regulatory rather than
revenue raising. A $50 annual fee is being proposed with a pro-rata
charged for those businesses registering in the middle of the year. A
$10 per day fee would be charged for temporary or itinerant
businesses. The City can only collect an amount which is reasonable
to administer the Ordinance.
Mayor Moffatt asked if someone obtained a County Peddler's Permit,
would this exempt them from having to register with the City of
Dublin.
Mr. Ambrose advised that he would have to check on this as he did not
know.
Carol Borus asked if the $10 per day for vendors would affect the
Murray School annual flea market.
Cm. Vonheeder felt it would depend on the application.
Mr. Ambrose felt the vendors would have to take out a 1-day permit.
Ms. Borus felt this would shut down their event. She advised that in
other cities, there are conditions that they must appear twice in a 1
year period in order to have to get a business license.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 170
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
Mr. Molina advised that the Committee discussed this. He discussed
possible scenarios if the school were to get one permit vs. each
vendor getting their own permits. As the Ordinance is currently
written, each vendor would have to pay a $10 fee.
Mayor Moffatt asked if the school could take out the permit and be
responsible for the profit making groups.
Cm. Vonheeder felt perhaps the word "vendor" could be redefined.
Typically, the people selling items are mainly just residents cleaning
out their garages.
Cm. Snyder indicated he never wanted to get into this as he had always
felt this was an illegal event.
City Attorney Nave felt this is not a profession, trade or occupation.
He felt they could be exempted. He did not feel the provisions would
apply to individuals who want to sell garage sale type stuff.
Mr. Molina suggested that a section be added to the Ordinance.
Mr. Ambrose clarified that the City Attorney's interpretation is that
if they are not a business, they would be exempt.
Cm. Snyder stated this is no different than the Shamrock Potato
Festival. It is up to the organization to make the distinction as to
who is a business and who is not. The school would need to do its own
enforcing.
Mr. Nave stated that if he were a homeowner and cleaned out his garage
and participated at the Flea Market, he would not need to register
with the City, but if he were selling up and down the state as a
business, he would have to get a 1-day permit to participate at this
event.
Ms. Borus questioned how they would go about getting this information
from all the applicants.
Mr. Ambrose stated the City could develop some kind of special
application form so they could be screened.
Cm. Vonheeder felt the City sponsored garage sale at Shannon Center
would have the same problems.
Don Johnson, President of the Chamber of Commerce indicated that it
was the Chamber members on the committee who recommended that these
types of groups obtain a permit for all the vendors under an umbrella.
The determining factor should be whether or not there is a non-profit
umbrella over them.
Mr. Ambrose stated the key provision is whether the person selling the
goods is selling for profit or not. If they are selling for profit,
they are subject to the Ordinance.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 171
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
Cm. Snyder stated he did not see this as a major thing.
Cm. Hegarty felt they would simply need to screen the people making
application to participate.
Ms. Borus stated it is a lot of work to put on this event and she
resented any additional work put on them. If the City wants this tax,
she questioned why the City didn't collect it.
Mr. Johnson felt her only obligation should be to inform potential
vendors. If they are a business, they need to get a City permit.
Mr. Nave also advised that she only needs to inform businesses that
they must get a business license from the City and pay a 1-day $10
fee.
Mr. Johnson stated that frankly he was surprised that more business
people had not come forward objecting to the Ordinance. There
certainly has been ample publicity. He stated that speaking on behalf
of the Chamber of Commerce, they favor adoption of this Ordinance.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Snyder, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous
vote, the Council waived the reading and adopted
ORDINANCE NO. 10 - 90
REGISTERING BUSINESSES
* *. * *
PUBLIC HEARING
NO PARKING ZONES ON WILDWOOD ROAD AND ON FALL CREEK ROAD
Mayor Moffatt opened the public hearing.
Public Works Director Thompson advised that on June 11, 1990, the City
Council accepted improvements constructed as part of Parcel Map 5353,
including Fall Creek Road. Wildwood Road was accepted some time ago
as part of the improvements for Village II. The developer was
required to install no parking signs on both these loop roads, as the
roads are too narrow to allow on-street parking. No residences of any
kind front on these streets, and the adjacent apartment or condominium
projects provide parking within the respective developments. The
City's Traffic Ordinance requires that no parking zones be adopted by
resolution.
No comments were made by the public on this issue.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 172
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
RESOLUTION NO. 83 - 90
DESIGNATING A NO PARKING ZONE
ON FALL CREEK ROAD AND ON WILDWOOD ROAD
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO ENCROACHMENT FEE
SCHEDULE REGARDING OVERSIZE/OVERWEIGHT VEHICLES
Mayor Moffatt opened the public hearing.
Public Works Director Thompson advised that in July of 1989, the State
Legislature adopted AB 1849, which amended Sections 35781 and 35795 of
the California Vehicle Code to require local jurisdictions to use the
same permit form and charge fees which are no higher than those
charged by the State Department of Transportation for oversize or
overweight vehicle permits.
During the last year, the State has worked with both trucking
associations and local jurisdictions to develop a permit form and a
fee structure that were acceptable to the greatest number of agencies.
Mr. Thompson advised that the resulting fees are lower than those
presently charged by the City of Dublin. The purpose of the fees is
only to cover the cost of administering the permits, not to reimburse
for damage to public streets caused by heavy vehicles. The City
presently charges $35 for a single-trip permit and $100 for an annual
permit. The required fees as of July 1st will be $15 for a single-
trip permit and $75 for an annual permit. Moves requiring Police or
Public Works Staff time for engineering or traffic control may still
be charged at the hourly rate for the service.
No comments were made by the public on this issue.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 84 - 90 ,
ADOPTING FEES FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES (MODIFYING EXHIBIT 4 -
ENCROACHMENT FEES) AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 'S 96-84 AND 51-89
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARING - CITYWIDE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83-1; 1989-90 LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS
Mayor Moffatt opened the public hearing.
Public Works Director Thompson advised that in 1983 , the City Council
formed a Citywide Street Lighting Assessment District to replace the
County of Alameda Lighting Service Area. The District budget for the
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 173
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
first fiscal year was $116,500. The proposed District cost estimate
for Fiscal Year 1990-91 is $287,264 , including an accumulated reserve
for future pole replacement. An estimated $105, 606 will be carried
over from 1989-90 in the form of reserves. The amount to be assessed
to property owners for the 1990-91 street lighting costs will be
$170, 632 . Last year's assessment for a single-family house was
$17. 82 . Staff estimated that the 1990-91 assessment would be about
the same or slightly lower for a single-family house based on the
proposed assessment.
No comments were made by the public on this issue. -
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery-, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, . and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 85 - 90
APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,
AND ORDERING LEVY OF ASSESSMENT FOR CITY OF DUBLIN
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 83-1
* * * *
TRIP TO SISTER CITY, BRAY, IRELAND
Mayor Moffatt presented a conceptual drawing of an imprint proposed to
be engraved on a piece of leather to be presented to the residents of
Dublin's sister City of Bray. The cost of the leather gift will be
approximately $300. Mayor Moffatt advised that it would be about a
10" x 18" piece of irregular leather and the flags and seals would be
stamped into the leather and stained.
The Council felt the flags should be reversed so the corresponding .
Country's flag is above the appropriate seal. -
Cm. Jeffery felt the flags should be deleted and they will look cheap
when painted.
Mayor. Moffatt stated the colors would be stained into the leather.
Mayor Moffatt questioned where the sign from Bray should be displayed.
The sign is currently in his office, as are a lot of other items.
Cm. Snyder indicated he would like to put it up with the collection of
pictures, etc. , in or around the Bray room. The Council discussed the
other items which needed to be displayed such as the proclamations,
the silver platter, the crystal vase, etc.
On motion of Cm. Snyder, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by majority
vote, the Council authorized the Mayor to proceed with the purchase of
the leather gift for Bray with the flags to be switched as discussed.
Cm. Jeffery voted against this motion.
* * * *
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 174 .
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH
STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1990
City .Clerk Kay Keck advised that the next Municipal Election will be
held in the City of Dublin on November 6, 1990. There will be three
City Council positions up for election. The nomination period runs
from July 16th through August 10th. If an incumbent does not file,
the time period is extended five days.
Ms. Keck advised that the Council may determine the allowable length
of the candidate statement (200 or 400 words) to be printed in the
sample ballot and also whether the costs associated with printing the
candidate's statement are paid by the City or each candidate. The
estimated costs will be $75 for a 200 word statement.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council determined that 200 words maximum would be allowed
in the candidate's statement and that costs will be borne by each
candidate.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 86 - 90
CALLING FOR A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE
CITY OF DUBLIN ON NOVEMBER 6, 1990; AND REQUESTING THE ALAMEDA COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO CONSOLIDATE WITH THE STATEWIDE
GENERAL ELECTION; AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN PROCEDURAL ACTIONS THEREFOR
and
RESOLUTION NO. 87 - 90
ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE
PERTAINING TO CANDIDATE'S STATEMENT AND THE COSTS THEREOF
FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE
STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1990
* * * *
OTHER BUSINESS
LAFCO Approval
Mr. Ambrose advised that LAFCO had approved the Hansen Hill Ranch
annexation request. They will be considering the Dublin Boulevard
annexation as well as the Doolan Canyon issue on July 26th. Staff
understands that they will allow a short public comment period. The
meeting will be at 4 : 00 p.m.
Dublin will also be hosting the Tri-Valley Joint City Councils that
evening beginning at 6: 30 p.m.
Cm. Snyder pointed out that the ABAG General Assembly is also being
held that evening.
Cm. Vonheeder suggested that the date of the Tri-Valley Joint Councils
be changed to the following Thursday evening, August 2nd.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 175
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
Mayor Moffatt and Cm. Snyder both indicated they would be out of town
on that date.
By a Council consensus, the date of Dublin hosting the Tri-Valley
Joint City Councils meeting was changed to August 2 , 1990.
Cm. Vonheeder stated that each City's Planning Department should come
prepared to make a presentation.
* * * *
Sound System in Council Chambers
Cm. Snyder stated with regard to the problems with the sound system in
the Council Chambers, we need to seriously consider whether the
existing system is appropriate. Maybe we should switch to a goose
neck system.
Staff was directed to look into this and take the necessary. steps to
solve the problem.
* * * *
Dublin Day at the Alameda County Fair
Mayor Moffatt announced that Tuesday, June 26th is Dublin Day at the
Fair.
* * * *
CLOSED SESSION
At 10:40 p.m. , the Council recessed to a closed executive session to
discuss Personnel matters in accordance with Government Code Section
54957 . 6.
* * * *
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the
meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p.m.
* * * *
Mayor '
ATTEST:
City Clerk
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 176
Regular Meeting June 25, 1990
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - June 26, 1990
An adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dublin
was held on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, in the Regional Meeting Room of
the Dublin Civic Center. The meeting was called to order at 6:50 p.m.
by Mayor Moffatt.
* *
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Hegarty, Jeffery, Snyder, Vonheeder and Mayor
Moffatt.
ABSENT: None.
* * * *
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Mayor led the Council, Staff and those present in- the pledge of
allegiance to the flag.
* * * *
Purchase of Police Cars
On motion of Cm. Snyder, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous
vote, the Council authorized Staff to purchase 3 fuel injected Police
vehicles from Shamrock Ford of Dublin for a total price of $45, 394.49.
* * * *
CONTRACT .REVIEW, FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM & BUDGET
City Manager Ambrose advised that this meeting had been set up so that
following the various contract reviews, the Council will consider the
new Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and then the 1990-91 Budget.
The evening of June 28th was also scheduled in the event of a need to
continue the meeting.
CONTRACT REVIEW
POLICE SERVICES
Police Services for Dublin are performed under contract with the
Alameda County Sheriff's Department. Patrol, criminal investigation,
crime prevention and business office functions are performed in the
City Offices. Dispatch and some data processing functions are handled
at the Alameda County Sheriff's Department Eden Township Substation.
Mr. Rankin advised that the contract arrangement provides distinct
advantages in the provision of personnel. These advantages include:
1) the contract requires the County to provide replacement personnel
when individuals are absent 10 or more days due to illness or injury;
2) the County is able to spread Workers' Compensation costs and other
benefits over a large base; and 3) the contract arrangement provides a
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 177
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
direct relationship with the Alameda County Sheriff's Department which.
provides an opportunity to access the resources of the County
Department in the event that mutual aid is required.
Staff prepared and discussed a detailed review of: Patrol Services;
Traffic Enforcement; Criminal Investigation; Juvenile Investigation/
Crime Prevention; Community Programs (Neighborhood Crime Watch,
Merchant Alert, Community Awareness, Safety Literature, and School
Liaison) ; Business Office Services; Public Information Dissemination;
Department Visibility and Identification; Administration/On-Site
Command;
Mr. Rankin advised that Staff recommended a higher staffing level for
Police Services in the upcoming year which is included in the proposed
budget as Higher Service Level I. This increment will reclassify one
Specialist Clerk to Secretary I and it will also add a Captain's
position as the on-site commander. The additional annual personnel
costs associated with these changes equal $89,964 . The proposed
staffing level will allow Dublin Police Services to meet the goals and
objectives adopted by the City Council.
In conclusion, Mr. Rankin stated that the City has continued to
receive quality municipal police services in a cost effective manner
by contracting with the Alameda County Sheriff's Department.
Undersheriff Garrigan advised that they fully support the Staff
recommendation and are desirous of continuing to provide service to
the City of Dublin. They are very proud of their organization.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Snyder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council approved the Higher Service Level presented for
Police Services and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 88 - 90
AMENDING AGREEMENT WITH ALAMEDA COUNTY FOR ENFORCEMENT
OF STATE LAWS AND CITY ORDINANCES
* * * *
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
Mr. Rankin advised that in June of 1989, the City Council approved a
3-year agreement with Alameda County Animal Control for the provision
of Field Services. Animal Control Services is divided into 2 basic
components, Field Services and Shelter Service. Field Services
includes the patrol and impounding functions. Shelter Service
involves the operation of the Santa Rita Shelter covered under a
continuous agreement which automatically renews- each year.
Field Service statistics were presented and reviewed.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 178
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
Staff advised that Alameda County operates the Santa Rita Shelter. In
addition to serving the unincorporated areas of eastern Alameda
County, the facility is used to impound animals from the Cities of
Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton, with each agency paying a
proportionate share of the operational costs.
Although Alameda County proposes a 27% increase in Dublin's costs for
the next fiscal year, funding the shelter jointly with other public
agencies continues to be the most cost effective method of providing
the service.
Mr. Rankin advised that for several years, Alameda County has been
discussing the possibility of constructing a new shelter. The
existing building is unsuitable for long term needs. The current
location also conflicts with conceptual plans for the former Santa
Rita Jail property. The principal location being considered is on
Alameda County property adjacent to the new jail and proposed
government center. Anticipated costs will be in excess of $3 . 2
million. It is anticipated that each agency will have an option to
finance their contribution over time. Current estimates of Dublin's
share of the construction costs range from $651, 000 to $813 , 750.
Should the City of San Ramon be included in the project, each agency's
cost would be reduced.
With regard to licensing, Mr. Rankin advised that experience has shown
that license compliance is very difficult without expending
significant resources for a door-to-door canvass.
In summary, Mr. Rankin advised that Staff did not recommend any
changes to the agreements for either field services or shelter
services. Staff anticipated that a separate agreement will be
forthcoming on the design and construction of a new shelter facility.
Sergeant Tarnow stated they enjoy working with the City of Dublin and
did not anticipate any problems in the future.
Cm. Hegarty advised that this is the first year he had not received
complaints related to animal control.
Cm. Jeffery felt the locations where you can purchase licenses are
fairly limited and questioned if Staff had considered issuing them at
the Civic Center.
Sergeant Tarnow stated that generally, there will not be much counter
traffic for dog licenses. Most are purchased at the animal shelter or
through the mail.
Mr. Rankin advised that Staff will be looking at other possibilities
in the future.
* * * *
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 179
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES
Ms. Texeira advised that since March, 1988, the City has contracted
with Alameda County on an annual basis for Vector Control Services.
The focus of Vector Control Services is to provide general information
to the public as well as areawide Vector Control Services. The
District responds to citizen requests for service, but does not
provide interior baiting or trapping on private property. Dublin
contracts directly with the County in lieu of participating in the
Countywide Vector Control Services District. The City funds vector
control services through the General Fund and as a result, Dublin
property owners receive the same level of service, but do not pay the
assessment as part of their property tax bill. The current agreement
requires an annual revision to adjust contract costs.
Ms. Texeira advised that the proposed amendment to the agreement
provides for an increase in both the number of Dublin "equivalent
benefit units' , as well as an increase in the "benefit assessment
rate" .
Cm. Snyder questioned what the $820 credit was for.
Ms. Texeira advised that if we were part of the District, this would
cover delinquencies.
Dr. Harvey Scudder questioned if any services for ticks with Lyme
Disease been done in the County.
Harry Scott, District Manager advised that they have done some
research. Two years ago at Del Valle Park, some ticks were picked up.
They plan in November to do some service in this area to see how many
ticks we have. The State doesn't have the money to test the ticks to
see if the ticks are positive. '
Cm. Hegarty questioned what would occur if they tested the ticks and
they were found to be positive.
Mr. Scott indicated that the most important item is education. They
have put together a video on Lyme Disease. They make presentations to
Boy Scouts and other groups of this type. They are working with a
local Veterinarian here in Dublin. The public is very concerned.
Cm. Hegarty asked the solution if dogs get ticks on them.
Mr. Scott indicated that people should examine their dogs and if ticks
are found, they should be removed. November through March is
generally the time when you pick out ticks that carry Lyme Disease.
Unfortunately, you cannot do environmental control for these ticks.
Cm. Hegarty questioned if examinations are possible on cattle, deer,
etc.
Mr. Scott advised that they have been working with Veterinarians on
dogs, but not other animals.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 180
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
✓, `�)
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 89 - 90
AMENDING CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AND ALAMEDA COUNTY FOR THE PROVISION OF
VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES
* * * *
CROSSING GUARDS & TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
Ms. Texeira advised that the City has contracted for crossing guard
services and traffic signal maintenance since incorporation. The
County of Alameda has been providing these services through their
Public Works Agency. The current 3-year agreement terminates on June
30th of this year.
The placement of crossing guards is based on adopted City Council
policy and adult crossing guards are currently provided at:
San Ramon Road and Shannon Avenue (Nielsen School)
Silvergate Drive and Amarillo Road (Nielsen School)
Amador Valley Boulevard and Burton Street (Frederiksen School)
Each location is staffed approximately 5 hours each school day.
During Fiscal Year 1989-90, the City paid an hourly rate of $9 . 00 per
hour for approximately 2 , 500 hours of service. For Fiscal Year 1990-
91, the County projects the cost for service to increase to $9 . 65 per
hour, with approximately 2 , 500 hours of service.
Mr. Thompson advised that traffic signal maintenance is important in
order to assure proper traffic control and to protect the City from
potential liability. The City currently has a total of 20
intersections with traffic signals. The intersections of Alcosta
Boulevard/San Ramon Road and Alcosta Boulevard/Davona Drive are
maintained by the City of San Ramon, which utilizes a private signal
maintenance contractor.
At the present time, the cost per hour for a signal maintenance
technician and truck is $31. 00 per hour for normal working hours and
$33 . 00 per hour for overtime callouts. Alameda County charges Dublin .
a surcharge for insurance coverage under their self-funded program
associated with all contract services. The total insurance surcharge
is $18,223 , with the major portion attributable to Police Services.
Staff advised that other options have been investigated for the
provision of signal maintenance, but given that the level of service
by the County has continued to be high, no complaints received, and
that the County is able to include new intersections as they are
constructed, Staff recommended that the City continue to contract with
the County.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 181
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
•
Ray Burnham stated he was pleased that the City is happy with their
services and they will continue to provide good service.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 90 - 90
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
FOR CROSSING GUARDS AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
* * * *
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES
Mr. Thompson advised that MCE Corporation has provided maintenance
services to the City since July, 1984 . Their services include: spill
cleanup, street repair, drainage maintenance, storm patrol/cleanup,.
curb-gutter-sidewalk temporary or emergency repair, sign installation-
repair and maintenance, striping and marking, guardrail repair, weed
abatement, bike path maintenance, street tree maintenance, street
landscaping maintenance, park maintenance, and limited building
maintenance. The City's current 3-year agreement expires on June 30th
of this year.
Mr. Thompson reported that MCE has developed a performance based
budget in which a very detailed inventory of improvements is
monitored. Their workload measures include a full time maintenance
supervisor who oversees the budget categories of park maintenance,
street tree maintenance, street maintenance, and street landscape
maintenance.
Staff discussed the Service Request Program and advised that MCE's job
evaluation score increased from 4. 54 in FY88-89 to 4 .80 for the first
11 months of FY89-90.
MCE's overall performance has continued to improve. They have
attempted to find different ways to reduce costs to the City and have
exercised consistent initiative in identifying problem areas as well
as keeping the Public Works Director's Office informed of the status
of maintenance activities.
Staff determined that it would not be economically feasible to provide
public works services in-house at this time.
The proposed new agreement with MCE incorporates several revisions
which have come about to clarify legal requirements. A new paragraph
has been added to the agreement which covers "work not subject to this
agreement" .
Mr. Thompson advised that as part of the higher service level
recommendation, Staff has included provision for a Building
Superintendent position which would manage the City's 5 facilities,
perform minor maintenance, and supervise building maintenance
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 182
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
contracts. Staff discussed the table of proposed labor and equipment.
rental rate revisions.
Maynard Crowther stated he looked forward with a great deal of
excitement to another year working with the City of Dublin.
Mr. Rankin passed out a corrected Resolution which included 2 sections
added by the City Attorney's Office. The additions were made to
clarify the materials and supplies issue.
On motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm. , and by unanimous vote,
the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 91 - 90
APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES
WITH MCE CORPORATION
BUILDING LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
Ms. Texeira advised that since 1983 , the City has contracted with the
firm of Taugher & Associates for services including: plan checking;
inspection of building construction; housing code enforcement; zoning
enforcement; and general administrative direction of, the Building &
Safety Department. In FY89-90, the City hired an Assistant Planner/
Zoning Investigator to perform zoning investigation.
Staff advised that overall, Staff is pleased with the caliber of
personnel provided through the contract. Due to the fact that the
building industry can experience fluctuations, a contract arrangement
allows the City to easily adjust to meet the demands. The contract
arrangement has also been beneficial in obtaining services on a less
than full-time basis from highly qualified individuals.
It is anticipated that the Building & Safety Department will ,
experience an increased workload in the upcoming year. To meet the
continuing demands of the Department, Mr. Taugher proposes to provide
4, 000 hours of inspection services. Mr. Taugher's time as Building
Official is estimated to remain consistent with FY89-90 at 1, 100
hours.
Staff advised that the only modification to the agreement being
proposed for FY90-91 is an adjustment to the hourly rates of
approximately 5%. The hourly rates charged include benefits, vehicles
and the contractor's overhead. Staff pointed out that there has been
a significant reduction in Mr. Taugher's insurance surcharge. A
$12 , 000 surcharge has been requested, which represents a $4,000 (or
33%) reduction in insurance costs from the 1989-90 estimate.
In previous Building & Safety Department contract reviews, it was
noted that the certainty of development within the extended planning
areas would warrant consideration of planning for an in-house Building
& Safety function. The study process for the extended planning areas
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 183
Adjourned Regular Meeting _ June 26, 1990
is now underway; however, it is not clear as to when actual
development may occur. The issue is further clouded by policies
adopted by Alameda County; specifically, policies relating to the Open
Space Element of the County General Plan.
Staff advised that because of the timing of development in the
extended planning areas, Staff is not recommending a change to in-
house Building Inspection services at this time. The 1990-91 budget
includes a higher service level of $9, 065 which would fund costs
associated with the implementation of the Earthquake Damage Assessment
Program identified in. the 1990 Goals & Objectives. The Building
Official will be responsible for coordinating the implementation of
this program.
Mr. Taugher thanked the City Council and other departments for all the
support he receives and indicated he was looking forward to next year.
Dr. Scudder stated he understood procedures used on inspections for
newly constructed homes, but questioned what happens when problems
develop afterward. He discussed failures of pressure regulators,
which cause excessive water pressure. This is very unfortunate,
particularly in this time of water shortages. Sometimes, the pressure
valves cannot even be found at some homes.
Mayor Moffatt advised that the City would look into this concern.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council approved the proposed contract amendment and
adjusted the hourly rate schedule effective August 1, 1990, and
authorized the Mayor to execute the amendment.
* * *
STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
Mr. Thompson advised that the City contracts with A-1 Sweeping for
commercial and residential street sweeping and emptying of trash cans
in the downtown area. The term of the existing sweeping contract is 2
years, with the option to renew the contract for 2 additional 1-year
extensions. The second year of the original contract ends on June
30th of this year.
Mr. Thompson advised that fewer service requests have been received
for street sweeping the last 2 years than in previous fiscal years.
A-1's response on emergency callouts has been good, with service
provided within an hour in most cases. They have responded- to service
requests within 24 hours or less in all cases, including personally
contacting the resident to discuss the situation.
During last year's contract review, it was reported that invoices were
submitted with insufficient backup or explanation. Staff is
continuing to work with A-1 to resolve these problems.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 184
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
Mr. Thompson advised that Staff feels that contract sweeping best
serves the City of Dublin. Staff proposed to add twice-monthly
sweeping of the parking lots at Alamo Creek Park, Dublin Sports
Grounds, Shannon Community Center, and the Civic Center to the
contract. In addition, the total City curb miles will increase by
about 11 as a result of new construction. Based on a 4 .9% increase in
curb mile charges and no increase in intersection sweeping, trash
receptacle pick-up and emergency call-outs, the total contract
increase is 4 . 5% for total estimated annual costs of $67, 492 .
Jim Rashleigh stated he would answer any questions.
Cm. Hegarty advised that people have commented to him that we are not
getting our money's worth from sweeping because we don't post the
streets to get the cars off. People don't seem to pay attention to
the scheduled sweeping day.
Mr. Rashleigh relayed a story about a customer who asked him the
schedule for sweeping of his street. He had 6 cars and stated he
would move them across the street. Mr. Rashleigh stated that sweeping
is a problem if there is even one car on the street.
Cm. Hegarty requested that he work with the City to try and resolve
this so that sweeping will be effective.
Mr. Thompson advised that a number of years ago, we put notices on
cars and got some angry responses. We have also sent notices out with
the City's newsletter and the calendars.
Mr. Rashleigh stated Dublin has a very active vehicle abatement
program which works quite well.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the Council would take action related to the
recommended contract extension for an additional 1-year period; as
well as the amendment to the contract increasing the fee per curb mile
from $14 . 30 to $15. 00 and adding semi-monthly sweeping of the 4
parking lots when they act on the budget.
* * * *
LIBRARY SERVICES
Ms. Lowart advised that the City has funded additional library hours
since October, 1983 . The original contract was for 7 additional hours
of service. The total number of City funded hours is currently 19.
Staff discussed the impact of the new libraries which opened in
Pleasanton and San Ramon.
Ms. Lowart advised that Alameda County does not anticipate additional
funding for library services which would enable them to reduce the
contract cost to the City. Staff recommended that the City continue
to fund the 19 additional hours of library service. Estimated costs
to the City for 1990-91 total $149, 650.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@* .
CM - VOL 9 - 185
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
•
Luanne Gilbert, Acting County Librarian advised that the community's
support for the Dublin Library has been extraordinary. She thanked
the City Council for funding additional hours and advised that they
are doing all they can to increase their support.
On motion of Cm. Hegarty, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 92 - 90
APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
FOR ADDITIONAL LIBRARY SERVICES
DURING FISCAL YEAR 1990-91
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
Mr. Thompson advised that Traffic Engineering services are provided by
the firm of TJKM. Services provided are generally in the areas of
private development review, Capital Improvement design and
construction review. In addition, they perform traffic engineering
studies as a result of citizen or City requests. Approximately 50
studies were done this year. These functions have been performed in a
timely and professional manner. Mr. Kinzel felt that improvement
could be made if a proactive approach were taken in the areas of
signal timing, operation, and special maintenance. He also suggested
that improvement could be made in regard to the standards and
procedures by which traffic signing, striping, and marking are
accomplished.
Staff has discussed and proposes to implement: 1) TJKM will supply a
traffic engineer approximately once a month to review signal timing in
the field and look for defects and enhancements that can be made; 2)
Staff proposes to develop a standard policy for installing and
replacing signs and markings to update some of the existing devices
from older installations; and 3) Staff has ordered extra copies of the
"State of California Manual of Traffic Controls" and "Work Area
Traffic Control Handbook" . A program is proposed to be implemented
for encroachment permittees to include the applicable sections of
these standards as an attachment for permits.
TJKM continues to charge the City at a reduced (80%) hourly rate for
general traffic studies. This reduced rate work amounted to 80% of
TJKM's charges for the 1989 calendar year. The remaining 20% was
expended on capital projects and private development review.
Mr. Thompson advised that Mr. Kinzel has requested hourly rate
increases which average 12 . 5%. The projected number of person hours
is being decreased by 8% for the 1990-91 budget.
Chris Kinzel stated he appreciated the opportunity of being involved
with the City and would love to continue.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 18 6 -
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
On motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 93 - 90
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES
WITH TJKM TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS
* * * *
ENGINEERING SERVICES
Mr. Thompson advised that general professional engineering services
have been provided by the firm of Santina & Thompson, Inc. , since
February, 1983 on a contract basis. In the past, these services have
included City Engineer, private development plan review and
inspection, Capital Improvement Project design and inspection, and
other related duties. During Fiscal Year 1988-89, the City hired its
own Public Works Director and one Public Works Inspector which
replaced the contract City Engineer and one Inspector position.
Santina & Thompson have continued to provide the services of a part-
time Assistant City Engineer under the contract arrangement. Mr.
Thompson advised that in 1990-91 it is proposed to replace the
contract Assistant City Engineer with a full-time City employee.
The firm of Santina & Thompson is a medium sized civil engineering
firm of approximately 60 people specializing in municipal clients and
offering Dublin expertise in many areas.
As proposed in the 1990-91 budget, Santina & Thompson staffing at the
Dublin City Offices anticipates one contract inspector to primarily
inspect private development work and an Assistant City Engineer an
average of 3 days per week for general engineering work (reports,
public contact, working on City goals and objectives, etc. ) , for the
first 4 months until a permanent replacement can be hired, and an
average of one day per week as the FAU project (San Ramon Road Phase
IV) Resident Engineer. This proposed move to a full-time Assistant
City Engineer will allow about 650 more hours at a cost savings of
$5, 900. The new position will take some of the engineering load off
the Public Works Director, whose responsibilities have expanded to
include the park and building maintenance programs.
Mr. Thompson advised that a proposed amendment to the contract would
include an average increase of 10. 12% based on all positions, and a
change to revise the noticing address for both Santina & Thompson and
the City.
Pete Santina thanked the City Council for allowing them to help. They
looked forward to working with the City next year. In the last 2
years, they have seen a 19% direct increase in labor costs. There is
a very high demand for civil engineers.
On motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 187
Adjourned Regular Meeting . June 26, 1990
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 90
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
WITH SANTINA & THOMPSON, INC.
* * * *
RECESS
Mayor Moffatt called a short recess. All Councilmembers were present
when the meeting was reconvened.
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARING
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (1990-95)
Mayor Moffatt opened the public hearing.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the total estimated cost for the Capital
Improvement Program between 1990-91 and 1994-95 is estimated at
$22, 210,213 (1990 dollars) . This amount does not include $2 , 123 ,402
expended on projects which will not be completed by June 30, 1990. Of
the total projects proposed, $215, 000 is identified for General
Improvements; $1, 347, 165 is identified for Community Improvements;
$4,838,844 is identified for Parks; and $15,809, 204 is identified for
Streets.
For this upcoming year, $6,916,913 is proposed for Capital Projects.
As shown, in the "All Program Summary", these costs will be funded by
a variety of sources. The primary funding sources are the General
Fund with $2 , 893 , 075, or 42%; the Dublin Boulevard Extension Fund with
$2,218, 000, or 32%; Federal and State Grants with $1,262, 273 , or 18%;
Reimbursements with $418,565, or 6%; and Measure B with $125, 000, or
2%. Of the $2,893, 075 from the General Fund, $1, 570, 009 comes from
General Fund Reserves, with the balance coming from the difference
between 1990-91 General Fund Revenues and 1990-91 General Fund
Operating Expenditures. The $2,218, 000 identified in the Dublin
Boulevard Extension Fund will be funded from BART loans which resulted
from litigation between the City and BART.
A shortfall in reimbursements could impact the City in Fiscal Year
1991-92 . The Dublin Boulevard widening project in particular, could
be affected. Eight new park projects are included.
Mr. Ambrose felt it was important to note that the City may choose to
participate in funding a Tri-Valley Animal Shelter in Fiscal Year
1990-91, which could cost the City an estimated $813 ,750. No funding
has been included in the CIP or Preliminary Budget, because neither
the amount required of the City for 1990-91, nor the most advantageous
method of financing the Shelter are certain at this time.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the 1990-95 CIP is an aggressive program to
increase the City's economic vitality in the Downtown, enhance our
residents leisure time and improve the City's transportation system
for the future.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 188
Adjourned Regular, Meeting June 26, 1990
Mayor Moffatt discussed the school renovation projects and asked if
money becomes available to the School District, will they contribute
more?
Mr. Ambrose advised that this is being negotiated on a project-by-
project basis.
Mr. Ambrose indicated that 4 new projects have been added to the
Streets category.
Dr. Scudder suggested that this whole process would be much clearer to
the average person if some kind of a denominator were used to put
things into perspective.
Mayor Moffatt stated that all the projects are capital improvements.
The majority of the programs are new which will be done for the most
part from square one. The cooperative school programs are essentially
rebuilding the whole thing.
Mr. Ambrose stated that relating costs to the relevancy of educational
costs is not the responsibility of the City.
Cm. Snyder advised that on every page of the Capital Improvement
Program there is verbiage which details each project. It makes the
process much clearer. A reference copy was provided to, Dr. Scudder to
review at the meeting.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Snyder, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 95 - 90
ADOPTING THE 1990-95
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
* * * *
PUBLIC HEARING
ADOPTION OF 1990-91 ANNUAL BUDGET & FINANCIAL PLAN
Mayor Moffatt opened the public hearing.
Mr. Ambrose advised that the total recommended appropriations for
Fiscal Year 1990-91 are $22, 963 , 083 and are broken down as follows:
Operating $13 , 275, 156
Debt Service 1,828,239
Capital 6, 916,913
Internal Service 209, 600
Appropriations to Reserves 733,175
Total $22 , 963 , 083
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 189
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
Although the recommended appropriations total $22 , 963 , 083 , the
anticipated net expenditures for the City are $20, 178 , 821. The
difference is the result of the following:
1) The City is required to show the City's Debt Service payment of
$1,719 , 820 in the Dublin Information, Inc. , Fund and the lease payment
of $1, 719 , 820 from the General Fund Operating Budget to the Dublin
Information Inc. , Fund. The City's actual Debt Service payment will
be reduced by $121, 667 in estimated interest earnings on the 1988
Certificate of Participation Reserve Fund.
2) Costs associated with the Internal Service Fund are also included
in the General Fund Operating Budget. These costs are charged to
various departmental users for the operation and replacement of
equipment in the Internal Service Fund.
The Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 1990-91 proposes that the City
Council approve the addition of 2 new City employee positions and 4
net contract employee positions, for a total of 6 new positions.
These additional positions are needed to keep pace with additional
workload, and provide a sufficient level of staffing to maintain the
City's buildings and infrastructure.
Mr. Ambrose also advised that several groups have requested funding
from the City. These include: 1) Tri-Valley Arts Facility Study
Committee; 2) Dublin Historical Preservation Association; 3) Dublin
Substance Abuse Council; 4) Resources for Family Development; and 5)
LAVTA.
Each group was invited to make a presentation to the City Council.
Tri-Valley Arts Facility Study Committee
Staff advised that for the past several months, representatives from
the City of Dublin have participated on the Tri-Valley Arts Facility
Study Committee. The Committee has recommended that a facility needs
assessment study be undertaken in order to evaluate the feasibility of
developing a facility in the Tri-Valley area. The estimated cost for
such a study is approximately $80, 000. The Committee has recommended
that the Cities of Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton and the South County
Community College District fund this study. Dublin has been requested
to fund $20, 000.
Cm. Jeffery advised that the study was felt to be needed as there are
several questions unanswered. Among other things, the study would
deal with whether we really do need a facility in this Valley.
Cm. Hegarty questioned if the facility would be built at the college.
Cm. Jeffery stated there were those who feel that it will, but there
are also those who feel it should not be out there. The study would
determine a number of factors.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 190
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
•
Cm. Snyder questioned if there was really any difference between a
needs assessment and a facility study.
Mr. Ambrose stated that a needs assessment study would actually
determine if there is a need for this type of a facility and the other
portion would be, how would it work.
Cm. Jeffery felt that perhaps what needs to be looked at is how
facilities already in the area can be utilized by everyone.
Cm. Snyder indicated he was a little edgy about investing $80, 000, as
there is a big difference between wants and needs.
Cm. Jeffery felt that it must be something that everyone can buy in to
and a study would determine this.
Cm. Hegarty stated he was uncomfortable with the $80, 000 figure.
Cm. Vonheeder questioned how we could get answers to regional concerns
if it isn't done in this way.
Cm. Hegarty stated he believes in Dublin first rather than regional.
The regional stuff belongs to the Board of Supervisors.
Dr. Scudder advised that there are 4 art associations which represent
the 4 valley cities. It would be a lot cheaper to bring them together
to discuss this.
Mayor Moffatt advised that this would be a performing arts feasibility
study.
Cm. Jeffery advised that it is more even than performing arts. It
could include a hands-on museum. There are all different kinds of
things that a facility could be used for.
Dublin Historical Preservation Association
Staff advised that on May 4, 1990, the City received a letter from the
President of the Dublin Historical Preservation Association requesting
that the City allocate some funding for the Dublin Historical
Preservation Association. In the letter, the Historical Association
indicated their concern regarding their ability to make the yearly
payment of $500 to the Cemetery Association. Staff understood that
since the time letter was sent to the City, the Dublin Historical
Association will be requesting $15, 000 from the City.
Staff advised that a letter was received this afternoon from Marie
Cronin requesting that the City fund $15, 000 for operating expenses
and program development.
Marie Cronin advised that she was just installed as President, but has
been on the Board for a number of years. The Association is 15 years
old. They have struggled to keep the Association alive. They hope to
try for some grants after they get support from the City. City
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 191
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
funding would give them an advantage to obtaining some grant money.
Each generation has a duty to preserve its history to contribute to
future generations. Their estimated budget for 1990-91 is $39,336.
Cm. Jeffery questioned what their budget was last year.
Ms. Cronin advised that it was $10, 000. Seven or eight years ago, .
their budgets were a lot larger. Things have tapered off in the last
few years and nothing much has been accomplished.
Cm. Hegarty stated that the Historical Association means a lot to the
City. He had anticipated this request since 1982 , however, $15, 000
was more than he had anticipated. He felt that they do need some seed
money.
Donna Miller indicated she had been a student at the old Murray
School. Dublin is very fortunate to have the oldest school in the
Valley, which was built in 1956. Membership costs are quite low, and
they do not have a lot of active members: . She expressed concern
related to damage done by leaky roofs and indicated that there are
some prime maintenance things that need to be taken care of soon.
Carolyn Flag indicated she also was a student at the old Murray
School. She conducted 2 third grade tours and the students asked a
lot of questions about the heritage. We should protect what we have
here in the United States as they do in Europe. Money is needed to
keep it up.
Mayor Moffatt felt some of the legal questions over who owns what is
still clouded.
Ms. Cronin explained the ownership of each facility. For a while,
there was a landlord and tenant dispute. They feel they have all the
rough spots worked out now.
Kathy Straub, former President indicated that they have worked hard to
provide a service. She urged the City Council to help the Dublin
Historical Preservation Association continue with all the good things
they have been doing in the past. Members are badly needed.
Dublin Substance Abuse Council
Staff advised that during Fiscal Year 1989-90, the City Council
authorized funding of the Dublin Substance Abuse Council in the amount
of $5, 000. This request at that time was represented to be a one-time
start-up request for funding.
This year, Karen Seals, on behalf of the Dublin Substance Abuse
Council has requested a $7, 000 contribution from the City. The Police
Chief has evaluated the request for funding, and recommends that the
City only contribute a maximum of $4, 000 to be used for expenses
associated with 'Red Ribbon Week' and 'Dry Graduation Night' for high
school students. The City, of course, will continue to support this
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 192
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
•
organization with Police. and Park & Recreation Staff, as well as the
use of City facilities for meetings.
Karen Seals stated she was thankful for the support received. She
felt the funds were spent wisely and cautiously. Next year's budget
is $18, 000. She stated she concurred with Chief Rose's
recommendation.
Cm. Snyder stated he thought the County would now allow operating
expenses to be charged against the County Drug Control program.
Resources for Family Development
Resources for Family Development is a non-profit corporation which
provides a variety of services in the Tri-Valley area. This
organization has requested $12,500 from the City for Fiscal Year 1990-
91 for various childcare activities. For Fiscal Year 1990-91, the
Recreation Department's budget includes a total of $66,535 for after
school and summer playground programs for children. Many of the
parents of these children use the City's playground programs for
childcare purposes. The City has also been participating in a
collaborate effort with the Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore in the
development of a 5-Year Regional Childcare Masterplan. This
Masterplan study has been funded by a state grant. It is anticipated
that the Masterplan will be completed in the summer of 1990 and
subsequently submitted to the three City Councils for their review.
Staff recommended that the Council defer the Resources for Family
Development request until the outcome of the Childcare Masterplan
study can be analyzed by Staff and reviewed by the City Council.
Marion Miller stated they are requesting $12 ,500 which will help
maintain quality services for families that live here. Availability
of the childcare substitute program has been very popular. In
addition, the training programs for new homes have been very effective
in decreasing the level of turnover, which helps to provide more
stable care for the children.
Ms. Lowart advised that they are in the final stages of the master
plan and this will be brought before the City Council in late July.
LAVTA Operating Subsidy
The Livermore/Amador Valley Transit Authority has requested that the
City of Dublin contribute. $1,500 to subsidize the Dial-A-Ride service
provided in the City of Dublin. Prior to Dial-A-Ride service being
provided by LAVTA, the City was a member of a Joint Powers Agreement
with the Cities of Danville and San Ramon for Dial-A-Ride service.
During the last year of membership in that Joint Powers Agreement, the
City's General Fund contribution was in excess of $14, 000, and the
fare box rate for riders was $ .75.
In 1988, Staff recommended that the City Council approve the City's
withdrawal from the JPA with San Ramon and Danville in order to have
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 193
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26,1990
LAVTA provide the service. At that time, LAVTA represented that the
City's subsidy would be only $2, 000 for Fiscal Year 1988-89 and no
operating subsidies would be required in subsequent fiscal years. The
LAVTA program also proposed a reduction of the $ .75 fare per zone to
$ .50 fare per zone. Based on LAVTA's proposal, the City withdrew
from the existing JPA.
Although the amount of $1,500 is not substantial, Staff expressed some
concerns regarding the reasons for the need for a City subsidy to
LAVTA. Staff is concerned that, at this time, LAVTA cannot guarantee
that this subsidy will not increase in future years.
Staff recommended that the Council consider the request, and if the
Council chooses to fund this amount, request LAVTA to do a more
indepth analysis and project future anticipated shortfalls in their.
farebox which could impact the Cities. Depending upon the extent of
the shortfall, the City may wish to evaluate other alternatives for
providing Dial-A-Ride service within the City of Dublin.
LAVTA Planner Sue Bruestle advised that on May 24th, they took to
their Board a fare increase to raise rates in the Cities of Dublin and
Livermore. At that time, there was quite a bit of, outcry from users.
Ms. Bruestle discussed requirements put on them by the PUC and MTC.
They need additional support. There is a 10% farebox requirement.
They requested $6, 000 last night from Livermore. This is not a one-
time situation, as the requirements will not go away. Rather, there
will be a lot of additional requirements put on them in the future.
Mayor Moffatt asked the reason why Staff did not recommend a fare
increase.
Ms. Bruestle indicated that they did recommend an increase. The
Board, however, heard comments and made the decision.
Cm. Vonheeder stated she was Dublin's representative on the Board at
that meeting. Public outcry was great and the Board give in.
Mayor Moffatt asked if more people could utilize Wheels.
Ms. Bruestle stated their route serves the senior centers. The policy
has always been to make paratransit available to those who really need
it.
Cm. Vonheeder stated that most are severely handicapped riders.
Mayor Moffatt asked if the funding will just. keep growing each year.
Ms. Bruestle stated they will look and estimate what the situation
will be in the future. They do not know what will happen in the
future with the additional requirements put on them.
Mr. Ambrose questioned the ridership statistics since LAVTA assumed
the program. It appears to be relatively consistent.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 194
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
Ms. Bruestle advised that Dublin usage has gone up, particularly with
regard to frequency. About 68 people are registered in the program in
Dublin. Dublin residents are getting a high level of service. A lot
of the funding is based on population.
Mayor Moffatt asked if there were restrictions on the people as to
where they can go.
Ms. Bruestle advised that they prioritize, but don't restrict.
Mayor Moffatt closed this portion of the public hearing.
Tri-Valley Arts Facility Study
Cm. Jeffery made a motion which was seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, to
contribute $20, 000 for the Tri-Valley Arts Facility Study and join
with the other groups that have approved funding. This motion was not
voted upon.
Cm. Snyder stated he was uncomfortable supporting this kind of a
contribution. If there were an RFP process, he would be more
comfortable. He did not feel it should cost $80, 000 to basically ask
people to submit an RFP.
Cm. Jeffery amended her motion.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by majority
vote, the Council agreed that Dublin would contribute 1/4 of the cost
of the study, when the amount is ascertained (up to $20, 000) . Cm.
Snyder and Cm. Hegarty voted against this motion.
Dublin Historical Preservation Association
Cm. Snyder stated that provided they can show they have an agreement
with the Cemetery Association, he would move to allow the Dublin
Historical Preservation Association $500 to include rent appropriation
+ projects at old Murray School to 1) fix the 16 broken windows
($1,200) ; 2) roof repairs ($5, 000) ; 3) exterior painting ($3,500); to
be paid upon presentation of invoices.
Cm. Hegarty felt that a reprint of Virginia Bennett's book was vital
to this City. He indicated he would support Cm. Snyder's motion +
hoped $2, 585 could be added for this purpose.
Cm. Snyder agreed to modify his motion to include the book.
On motion of Cm. Snyder, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous
vote, the Council agreed to provide a total of $12,785 in funding to
the Dublin Historical Preservation Association, with stipulations
discussed above.
Cm. Vonheeder questioned if the estimates for repairs were reasonable
and if the City could do the work.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 195
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
Cm. Snyder advised that the City has no right to go in there as it is
not City property.
Cm. Jeffery suggested that Staff look at the figures to see if there
might be other ways to do this. More definitive figures are needed.
Cm. Snyder stated he hoped there was integrity in the figures
presented.
The Council clarified that before it would expend any money, the
Historical Association needed to provide the City with a copy of an
executed lease agreement with the Cemetery Association. The City will
also require invoices which clearly identify the exact cost of the
work performed for each item, and will only pay the actual cost for
accomplishing the work up to and not to exceed the amount identified
for each item.
Dublin Substance Abuse Council
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, the Council authorized $4, 000 in funding for the Dublin
Substance Abuse Council.
Resources for Family Development
Mayor Moffatt advised that due to a conflict of interest, he would not
participate in the discussion or vote related to funding for Resources
for Family Development.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Snyder (Mayor Moffatt
abstained) , and by majority vote, the Council agreed to hold off on
the request from Resources for Family Development until the report has
been completed.
LAVTA
On motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm. Jeffery, and by unanimous
vote, the Council agreed to provide $1,500 in one-time funding to
LAVTA as a subsidy for the Dial-A-Ride paratransit program.
RECESS
Mayor Moffatt called a short recess. All Councilmembers were present
when the meeting was reconvened.
* * * *
Mr. Ambrose went through the budget page-by-page and explained each
program area.
The City Manager's budget includes a customer service program, costs
related to assuming DRFA administration, deleting the position of
Administrative Assistant and adding position of Assistant to the City
Manager.
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 196
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
A higher service level is proposed for the Finance budget because of
the Business Registration Program.
In the Building Management budget, Staff recommended adding a full-
time contract Building Superintendent. Staff will develop a work
order system. Cm. Snyder questioned if this person would ultimately
be responsible for opening and closing of the Civic Center building.
A higher service level proposed in the Police Department would provide
for the addition of a Captain's position, plus purchase of an
additional unmarked vehicle, plus reclassify one existing Specialist
Clerk to Secretary.
A higher proposed service level in the Public Works Administration
budget would increase the current half-time Clerk Typist/Receptionist
position to full-time.
A proposed higher service level in the Building & Safety Department
budget would provide for the addition of a temporary part-time
Building Intern, additional secretarial overtime, and printing to
implement the Earthquake Damage Assessment Program.
A new budget program was added this year as economic development, to
enhance the City's economic base through various promotional
activities, as well as the development of a community profile brochure
and to participate in the Alameda County Economic Development Program.
Mayor Moffatt closed the public hearing.
On motion of Cm. Jeffery, seconded by Cm. Vonheeder, and by unanimous
vote, with the changed discussed, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 90
ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF DUBLIN
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91
* * * *
1990-91 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Staff advised that each fiscal year, the City Council is required to
adopt an appropriations limit. According to the legislation that
initiated the appropriations limit requirements, the limit changes
each year by the change in Dublin's population plus the lesser of the
change in the U. S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) , or the change in the
State per capita personal income.
The City's appropriations limit base for Fiscal Year 1990-91 is
calculated as follows: $14,436,706 x 1. 1391596 = $16,445,712
This limit only restricts those appropriations which are funded by
proceeds of taxes as defined by Article XIIIB of the State
Constitution. The amount of proceeds of taxes for Fiscal Year 1990-91
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 197
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990
is estimated to be $11, 627,212 . Therefore, the City will be
$4,818, 500 under its appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 1990-91.
Staff discussed the impact of Proposition 111 and advised that the
City Council adopt an appropriations limit which is calculated based
on the provisions of the old law. Once information from the County
Assessor's Office is made available, and guidelines for implementation
are made available by the League of California Cities, Staff will
present . a revised limit calculation for Council consideration.
Cm. Vonheeder advised that the League has indicated that guidelines
should be ready by the end of July, at which time we will be able to
amend the Appropriations Limit.
On motion of Cm. Vonheeder, seconded by Cm. Hegarty, and by unanimous
`vote, the Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 97 - 90
ADOPTING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 ($16,445,712)
* * * *
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the
meeting was adjourned at 11:35 p.m.
* * * *
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
* * * *
@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*
CM - VOL 9 - 198
Adjourned Regular Meeting June 26, 1990