HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.07 Accept Work 89-10 CITY OF DUBLIN
AGENDA STATEMENT
City Council Meeting Date: May 14, 1990
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Work - Contract No. 89-10
Traffic Signal Pre-Emption System
(Report by Public Works Director Lee Thompson)
EXHIBITS ATTACHED:
RECOMMENDATION:
,~ ~[~1! Accept improvements under Contract 89-10.
~/j/O 2) Authorize retention payment in the amount of
\ $9,860 to Steiny & Co., Inc.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Budget for this project:
Prior Years 1989-90 Total
$ 6,978 $ 8,022 $ 15,000
0 0 0
0 100,000 100,000
$ 6,978 $ 108,022 $ 115,000'
Design/Inspection
Legal Notice & Postage
Construction
* The budget for this project was originally $125,000; however, $10,000 was
transferred to the Alamo Creek Park Project.
Actual expenditures:
Prior Years 1989-90 Total
$ 6,978.00 $ 8,613.69 $ 15,591.69
0.00 329.15 329.15
0.00 98,600.00 98,600.00
$ 6,978.00 $107,542.84 $114,520.84
Design/Inspection
Legal Notice & Postage
Construction
DESCRIPTION:
In October of 1989, the City Council awarded Contract 89-10, Traffic Signal
Pre-Emption System, to Steiny & Co., Inc.
This project installed optical receivers and pre-emption equipment at eleven
signalized intersections to allow fire trucks to turn their approach
direction signal to green.
Intersections which received pre-emption devices as part of Contract 89-10
are:
Dublin Boulevard at Regional Street
Dublin Boulevard at Golden Gate Drive
Dublin Boulevard at Amador Plaza Road
Dublin Boulevard at Village Parkway
Amador Valley Blvd. at Regional Street
Amador Valley Blvd. at Village Parkway
Dublin Boulevard at Clark Avenue
Dublin Boulevard at Dublin Court
Dublin Boulevard at Dougherty Road
Amador Valley Blvd. at Donohue Drive
Amador Valley Blvd. at Stagecoach Rd.
The Dougherty Regional Fire Authority previously equipped their trucks with
sending units so that this system is now totally operational.
The City Engineer has reviewed the work on the project and determined that it
is complete and in accordance with the approved plans and specifications.
The project was completed within the time allotted, and there were no change
orders. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the improvements and
authorize payment of retention to Steiny & Co. in the amount of $9,860.00.
ITEM NO.__~~ COPIES TO: Steiny & Co., Inc.